alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LAKE COUNTY EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE

CERTIFICACIÓN DE INGRESOS

El formulario debe ser completado por el jefe de familia y firmado por todos los miembros adultos 

del hogar si el hogar está verificando ingresos sin documentos.

Jefe(a) de Hogar: Fecha: 

Solicitante: Numero de Aplicacion: 

(sólo para uso de oficina)

* Reconocimiento: Al escribir sus iniciales o su nombre a continuación, reconoce y acepta que 

esto representa su firma y da fe de que toda la información se proporciona en este formulario. 

1. Yo / nosotros, certifico (camos) que recibi (mos) individualmente fuentes de ingresos 

sin documentos: 

Semanal _ o 

Mensual _ o 

Anual _ 

Tipo de ingreso

Iniciales

2. Yo / nosotros tenemos ingresos actualmente y no se espera ningún cambio en mi 

situación financiera o en mi situación laboral durante los próximos 12 meses.

Iniciales

Bajo pena de perjurio, certifico que la información presentada en esta certificación es 

verdadera y precisa a mi leal saber y entender. El abajo firmante comprende además que 

proporcionar declaraciones falsas en este documento constituye un acto de fraude. La 

información falsa, engañosa o incompleta puede resultar en la terminación y el pago requerido 

de todos y cada uno de los beneficios recibidos a través del Programa de Asistencia de 

Emergencia para el Alquiler de Indiana.

___________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ 

Nombre impreso de Solicitante/Inquilino * Firma de Solicitante/Inquilino Fecha

___________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ 

Nombre impreso de Solicitante/Inquilino * Firma de Solicitante/Inquilino Fecha

___________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ 

Nombre impreso de Solicitante/Inquilino * Firma de Solicitante/Inquilino Fecha

___________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ 

Nombre impreso de Solicitante/Inquilino * Firma de Solicitante/Inquilino Fecha
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-77-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Removal of 
Gas Research Institute Funding Unit Rates

December 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff the following revised tariff sheets to become effective 
January 1, 1998:

Second Revised Volume No. 1

Twenty-eighth Revised Sheet No. 15
Thirty-first Revised Sheet No. 16
Twenty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 18
Twenty-fourth Revised Sheet No. 21

Original Volume No. 2

Seventy-second Revised Sheet No. 11B

    Williston Basin states that on September 16, 1997, it gave advance 
notice of its resignation from the Gas Research Institute (GRI), in 
order to give GRI the opportunity to factor such resignation into its 
planning for funding and all other purposes. Williston Basin further 
states its future participation in GRI has become untenable due to the 
uncertainty surrounding GRI's requested and required funding needs both 
now and into the future. Therefore, the revised tariff sheets reflect 
the removal of the GRI Funding Unit rates from all applicable rate 
schedules.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32140 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Joseph DeMARCO d/b/a Trail Truck & Tractor, Appellant, v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 73-1463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State,

v.

DAVID BARRON,

 Appellee.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-12-00245-CR

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D01101)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until August 14, 2013. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. M. Clara Hernandez, the Appellee’s Attorney, 

prepare the Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 14, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of July, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 24, 2021

No. 04-21-00206-CV

CR+ ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS 

Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-NC4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC4,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI19332

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

When we granted Appellee’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief, we set 

the brief due on November 12, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b), (d). Before the once-extended 

due date, Appellee filed an unopposed second motion for a 14-day extension of time to file the 

brief.

Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on November 29, 2021. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### Donald Joseph BARRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1636.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 21, 1978.

Sheldon M. Schapiro, Hollywood, and Raymond M. Windsor, Plantation, of Stone & Schapiro, Hollywood, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty, Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possession of more than five grams of marijuana, which was located in a shed on a ranch owned by A. Douda & Sons. The evidence is entirely circumstantial and it is not inconsistent with appellant’s innocence. Thus, there is insufficient evidence upon which to support the conviction.

Accordingly, the other points raised need not be considered because our determination requires a reversal of the judgment and sentence appealed from and appellant’s discharge.

*877REVERSED AND REMANDED with directions to discharge appellant.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
#### William Earl DODSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 76-2135 and 77-158.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before KEHOE, J., and BOYD, JOSEPH A., JR., Associate Judge and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

By appeal No. 76-2135, the defendant below seeks reversal of his conviction of grand larceny, the theft of a privately-owned automobile. On the trial which was before a jury, the State produced evidence in support of the charge, including testimony of an arresting officer that the defendant had admitted to him the theft of the car. The defendant testified. On direct examination his attorney questioned him regarding a conviction for auto theft twelve years previous, which the defendant admitted. His attorney then asked the defendant if he had been convicted of “other crimes” and of “other felonies”, to which the defendant answered in the affirmative.

*879On cross-examination the prosecutor interrogated the defendant as to such “other crimes”, bringing out that they included another car theft, and thefts of property on breaking and entering.

Appellant contends the allowance of such cross-examination, over objection, deprived the defendant of a fair trial. We cannot agree. No reversible error was thereby committed. Defendant’s attorney opened the door. *Shea v. State,*167 So.2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); *Martin v. United States,*404 F.2d 640, 642-643 (10th Cir. 1968).

By questions on direct examination of the defendant his attorney had created basis for an inference that there was one prior conviction for auto theft and that there were other crimes, i. e., crimes other than theft. The prosecutor, by cross-examination, sought to and did establish that such other crimes included auto theft and theft of other properties. Crimes of that kind, as distinguished from acts of violence, “are universally regarded as conduct which reflects adversely on a man’s honesty and integrity”. *Gordon v. United States,*127 U.S.App.D.C. 343, 383 F.2d 936 (1967). That gave that evidence of other crimes materiality. *Williams v. State,*110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959). Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Appeal No. 77-158 is from an order revoking the defendant’s probation based on his above conviction. The contention on this other appeal is that the revocation order should be reversed if the judgment of conviction above referred to is reversed. That did not occur, and the order revoking probation is affirmed.
Exhibit 13.2


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Annual Report of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Date: March 18, 2016/s/ Brian LeeBrian LeeChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”)hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 24, 2006 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| *July 31, 2006* | * * | By:    |   | */s/ Robert P. Story,  Jr.*     |
|-----------------|----------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
| Date            |     |   |   | Robert P. Story, Jr.                 |
| ** **      |     |   |   | Senior Vice President and            |
|            |     |   |   |    Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shallit be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

----
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Lawrence E. KIBLER, as Executor under the Will of Viola K. Toomey, deceased, Relator, v. Honorable David Seth WALKER, Judge of the County Judge’s Court in and for Pinellas County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-149.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 9, 1971.

Prohibition denied.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 37

 38

 39

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/15

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

★ ●

● ●

●
**Exhibit 10.3**

**AMENDMENTTOCOURIER CORPORATION2005 STOCK EQUITY PLANFOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS**

# A.            TheCourier Corporation 2005 Stock Equity Plan for Non-employee Directors (the “Plan”),effective November 3, 2004, is hereby amended pursuant to the authorityreserved in Section 9 thereof:

## 1.             Section 4 is herebyamended by deleting the second paragraph thereof and substituting therefor thefollowing:

“In the event that theoutstanding shares of the Stock of the Company are hereafter increased ordecreased or changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind ofshares, or other securities of the Company or of another corporation, by reasonof reorganization, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification,stock split up, combination of shares, or dividends payable in stock, equitableor proportionate adjustments shall be made in the number and kind of sharesunderlying outstanding Options or Stock Units as well as the number of sharesfor which future grants may be made.  TheBoard of Directors shall also make equitable or proportionate adjustments inthe number of shares underlying outstanding Options to take into account cashdividends declared and paid by the Company other than in the ordinarycourse.  Such adjustments in outstandingOptions shall be made without a change in the aggregate total option price ofOptions then outstanding and unexercised, but with a corresponding adjustmentin the option price per share. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no adjustments shall be required if theBoard of Directors determines that such action could cause an Option to fail tosatisfy the conditions of any applicable exception from the requirements ofSection 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Any such adjustment made by the Board of Directors shall be conclusiveand binding upon all affected persons, including the Company and allParticipants.”

# B.            Exceptas amended herein, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.

# C.            Theeffective date of this Amendment is December 7, 2006.

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Henry ANDERSON, Jr.

No. 61244.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 5, 1978.

In re: Henry Anderson, Jr., applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Denied; this application is a copy of # 61241, this day denied.
#### Eugene J. CARTER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

No. 02-3250.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 7, 2002.

ORDER

The petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of filing of this order.
EXHIBIT 11.2

| thousands,      except share and per share data                  |   | 12      Weeks Ended |        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|-------------|
|                                                             |   | April      26, 2008 |        |   | April      28, 2007 |   |
| Basic:                                                           |   |                |        |   |   |   |
| Net      (loss) earnings applicable to common shares             |   | $                   | (256        | ) |   | $ | 2,555 |   |
|                                                             |   |                |        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Shares:                                                          |   |                |        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of common and                       |   |                |        |   |   |   |   |   |
| common      equivalent shares outstanding                        |   |                | 17,045,770  |   |   |   | 16,981,744 |   |
| Less:      Treasury stock - weighted average                     |   |                | (10,595,319 | ) |   |   | (10,618,299 | ) |
|                                                             |   |                |        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of common and common                |   |                |        |   |   |   |   |   |
| equivalent      shares outstanding                               |   |                | 6,450,451   |   |   |   | 6,363,445 |   |
|                                                             |   |                |        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      (loss) earnings per common and common equivalent shares |   | $                   | (0.04       | ) |   | $ | 0.40 |   |
|                                                             |   |                |        |   |   |   |   |   |
EXHIBIT
32.02





Section 1350Certification





In
connection with this annual report of Futures Portfolio Fund, Limited
Partnership (the
“Company”)on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof(this “Report”), I, Ahmed S. Hassanein,Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officerof the General Partner of
the Companycertify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.  This
Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;and





2.  The
information contained in this Reportfairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
March 31, 2009





/s/Ahmed
S. Hassanein


By:


Ahmed S.
Hassanein


Chief
Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the General
Partner


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT32**

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in itsindividual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Trust.
|               |   |   |   | Bank of America, N.A.,             |
|---------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------|
|          |   |   |   | Trustee for Hugoton  Royalty Trust |
|          |   |   |   |                               |
|          |   |   |   |                               |
|          |   |   |   |                               |
| March 1, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ NANCY G. WILLIS                |
|          |   |   |   | Nancy G. Willis                    |
|          |   |   |   | Vice President                     |

 

----
#### Eleanor FARACI, Appellant, v. R. L. O’DELL et al., Appellees.

No. 70-530.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
DWS LifeCompass Retirement Fund
DWS LifeCompass 2015 Fund
DWS LifeCompass 2020 Fund
DWS LifeCompass 2030 Fund
DWS LifeCompass 2040 Fund


Supplement to the  currently  effective  Statements  of  Additional  Information
("SAIs") for the above-listed funds.

The following information  supplements  information contained in "The Underlying
DWS Funds" section of the funds' SAIs:

DWS RREEF  Global  Infrastructure  Fund.  The fund seeks total  return from both
capital appreciation and current income through investment in a global portfolio
of securities of infrastructure-related  companies.  Under normal circumstances,
the fund  invests  at least 80% of its net  assets in the  securities  of US and
non-US  infrastructure-related  companies. The fund considers a company to be an
infrastructure-related  company  if at  least  50% of its  non-cash  assets  are
infrastructure  assets or 50% of its gross  income or net profits  are  derived,
directly or indirectly, from the ownership, management, construction, operation,
utilization or financing of infrastructure  assets. Under normal  circumstances,
the fund  invests  principally  in equity  securities,  though  the fun may also
invest in fixed-income  securities  without  limitation.  The fund may invest in
common  and  preferred  stock  (including  convertible  securities),  rights  or
warrants  to  purchase   common  stock,   debt  securities  and  listed  limited
partnership  interests.  Under normal circumstances,  the majority of the fund's
assets are invested in securities of issuers organized or located outside the US
or doing a substantial amount of business outside the US. The fund allocates its
assets  among  various  regions and  countries,  including  exposure to emerging
market countries.

The above fund is also added to the list of  Underlying  DWS Funds  contained in
the SAIs for DWS LifeCompass  Retirement  Fund, DWS  LifeCompass  2015 Fund, DWS
LifeCompass 2020 Fund, DWS LifeCompass 2030 Fund and DWS LifeCompass 2040 Fund.

The following information  supplements  information contained in the "Investment
Policies and Techniques of the Underlying DWS Funds" section of the funds' SAIs:

Non-diversification.  DWS RREEF Global  Infrastructure  Fund is  classified as a
non-diversified  management  investment  company under the 1940 Act, which means
that the fund is not  limited  by the 1940 Act in the  proportion  of its assets
that it may invest in the  obligations of a single  issuer.  The investment of a
large  percentage  of the fund's  assets in the  securities of a small number of
issuers  may cause  the  fund's  share  price to  fluctuate  more than that of a
diversified fund.



               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference



September 29, 2008