alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 8 

Ref: 8P-AR 

Martha Rudolph 

Colorado Department of Public Health 

and Environment 

4300 Cherry Creek Drive South 

Denver, CO 80246-1530 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

DENVER, CO 80202-1129 

Phone 800-227-8917 

~ttp://www.epa.gov/region08 

NOV 012013 .. 

RE: High Wind PM10 Exceedance in Telluride on April 16, 2013 

Dear Ms. Rudolph: 

This letter responds to the October 3, 2013 submittal for approval of a high wind exceptional event 

demonstration for Telluride, Colorado. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 

(CDPHE) determined that this regional high wind event caused an exceedance of the PM10 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) at the monitor in Telluride on April16, 2013. 

EPA has reviewed the documentation provided by CDPHE to demonstrate that this exceedance meets 

the criteria for an exceptional event under the Exceptional Events Rule (EER), 40 CFR 50.14. EPA 

concurs based on the weight of evidence that CDPHE has successfully made the demonstration 

necessary to comply with 40 CFR 50.14. 

In addition, CDPHE has met the schedule and procedural requirements in section 50.14(c) with respect 

to the demonstration. A more detailed assessment ofCDPHE's demonstration is enclosed. My staffhas 

entered "concurrence flags" for the Telluride data into EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). 

Based on this determination, EPA will exclude these data from the following types of calculations and 

activities: 

• EPA's AQS will not count these days as exceedances when generating user reports, or 

include them in design values estimates, unless the AQS user specifically indicates that 

they should be included. 

• EPA will accept the exclusion of these data for the purposes of selecting appropriate 

background concentrations for New Source Review air quality analyses. 1 

• EPA will accept the exclusion of these data for the purposes of selecting appropriate 

background concentrations for transportation conformity hot spot analyses.2 

1 If EPA is the permitting authority, EPA will propose permits on this basis. If EPA is commenting on another permitting 

authority's proposed action, EPA's comments will be consistent with the determinations in this letter. 
The determination conveyed in this letter does not constitute final EPA action regarding any matter on 

which EPA is required to provide an opportunity for public comment. In particular, this applies to 

determinations regarding the attainment status or classification of this area. Final actions will take place 

only after EPA completes notice and comment rulemaking on those determinations. As an additional 

clarification, the determination conveyed in this letter is applicable only to the PM10 NAAQS. 

If you or your staff have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact Carl Daly at 

(303) 312-6416. 

Enclosure 

Shaun L. McGrath 

Regional Administrator 

cc: William Allison, CDPHE Air Pollution Control Division 

Gordon Pierce, CDPHE Air Pollution Control Division, Technical Services Program 

2 Applicable only to PM10 and PM2.5 

2 

@Printed on Recycled Paper
Public Meeting

Wednesday, October 26, 2022

1:00 p.m. EDT – 4:00 p.m. EDT

Cash Room, Treasury Building

Call to Order

Tribal Opening

Remarks by Secretary Janet L. Yellen

Comments by Members of the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee (TTAC)

Remarks by Treasurer Marilynn “Lynn” Malerba

Election of TTAC Officers and Organizing Business

Federal Agency Updates

TTAC Subcommittee Updates

1. General Welfare Exclusion

2. Dual Taxation

3. Tribal Pensions

Public Comments

Other Items

Close of Business 

Adjourn
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          89,686
<SECURITIES>                                42,184,210
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,757,753
<PP&E>                                       1,167,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                 777,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,179,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,054,790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,097
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,072,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,179,990
<SALES>                                        259,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,088,320
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  616,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,191,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             447,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (167,018)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (181,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (181,018)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

y0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

140881 

ROGER SHERR and ANDREA SHERR, 

Petitioners-Appellants, 

v SC: 140881 

 COA: 290386 

Tax Tribunal: 00-327306 

TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD 

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
#### Wesley C. HOLLEY v. VINTAGE HOMES, INC., and Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company.

No. 50577.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 30, 1978.

Caldwell & Lewis, Ben M. Caldwell, Marks, for appellant.

Daniel, Coker, Horton, Bell & Dukes, B. Stevens Hazard, Jackson, for appellees.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coahoma County; J. C. Feduccia, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

July 20, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-16599

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00416-CV-ORL-28-DAB

CHARLIE H. DAVIS, 

LEYDA E. CHEW, 

both individually and on behalf of 

Lequindra Keion Davis (19) and 

Chalise Davis (20), 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

versus 

HON. GEORGE WINSLOW, JR., 

RICHARD S. GRAHAM, 

BARBARA FANCHER JONES, Attorney, 

KATHY A. JIMENEZ, Attorney, 

ERIK K. NEITZKE, Attorney, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(July 20, 2006)
2

Before BLACK, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charlie Davis and Leyda Chew, proceeding pro se, appeal the district court’s

dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Davis and Chew alleged that the

actions of which they complain were taken by the state-actor defendants in their

individual capacities. Davis and Chew asserted a variety of contractual,

constitutional, and civil rights statutory causes of action, including 42 U.S.C. §

1983 and asked for money damages, custody of Chew’s son, reinstatement of

Davis’s driver’s license, annulment of Chew’s divorce agreement with Harry Sperl,

punitive damages, attorney’s fees, and unspecified injunctive relief. Davis and

Chew made it clear in their arguments to the district court that they are challenging

the judgments against them in state court. 

The Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprived the district court of subject-matter

jurisdiction to hear Davis and Chew’s claims. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine

establishes that federal courts, other than the Supreme Court, do not have subjectmatter jurisdiction over actions that effectively seek to appeal state court

judgments. Amos v. Glynn County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 347 F.3d 1249, 1265 n.11

(11th Cir. 2003); D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482, 103 S. Ct.

1303, 1315, 75 L. Ed. 2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413,
3

415-16, 44 S. Ct. 149, 150, 68 L. Ed. 362 (1923). Davis and Chew allege nothing

to indicate that they were in any way deprived of the opportunity to raise their

issues in the state court proceedings. To the extent that Davis and Chew raise

issues that extend beyond a dissatisfaction with the outcome of their state court

cases, those issues were decided by the state courts or inextricably bound up in

those decisions.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33777]



[[Page 67632]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of U.S. Patents for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or 
Partially-Exclusive Licensing

AGENCY: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the 
availability of the following U.S. patents for non-exclusive, partially 
exclusive or exclusive licensing. All of the listed patents have been 
assigned to the United States of America as represented by the 
Secretary of the Army, Washington, D.C.
    These patents cover a wide variety of technical arts including: A 
long-range nonlethal bullet, a device to detect muzzle flash from a 
gun.
    Under the authority of Section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology 
Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, 
United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the 
U.S. Army Research Laboratory wish to license the U.S. patents listed 
below in a non-exclusive, exclusive or partially exclusive manner to 
any party interested in manufacturing, using, and/or selling devices or 
processes covered by these patents.
    Title: Long-Range Nonlethal Bullet.
    Inventor: Raine M. Gilbert.
    Patent Number: 5,691,501.
    Issued Date: November 25, 1997.

    Title: Infrared Sniper Detection Enhancement.
    Inventor: David B. Hillis.
    Patent Number: 5,686,889.
    Issue Date: November 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Norma Vaught, Technology Transfer Office, AMSRL-CS-TT, U.S. Army 
Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland 20832-1197, tel: (301) 394-2952; 
fax: (301) 394-5815 e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d736b7c687a75695d7c6f7133707471"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5bba3b4a0b2bda195b4a7b9fbb8bcb9">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Mary V. Yonts,
Alternate Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-33777 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Joel L. NORRIS, Relator, v. The Honorable Gunter STEPHENSON, Judge, Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Polk County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-701.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 22, 1969.

Prohibition denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2000-010 New York]


Power Authority of the State of New York; Correction to Notice of 
1998 Schedule of Meetings To Discuss Settlement for Relicensing of the 
St. Lawrence-FDR Power Project

December 18, 1997.
    On November 25, 1997, [FR Doc. 97-31481 (62 FR 63702, December 2, 
1997)] a notice of a list of 1998 schedule of meetings for the 
Cooperative Consultation Process Team and Subcommittees to continue 
settlement negotiations for the St. Lawrence-FDR Power Project located 
on the St. Lawrence River, St. Lawrence County, New York, was issued. 
The following revisions should be made.
    (a) Under the Land Management and Recreation Subcommittee, delete 
``January 28, 1998'' and replace with ``January 29, 1998''. (62 FR 
63703, column 1, item 3).
    (b) Under the Socioeconomic Subcommittee, delete ``January 29, 
1998, and replace with ``January 28, 1998''. (62 FR 63703, column 1, 
item 4)
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33514 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Barbara BECKER and Erwin Becker, her husband, Appellants, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, and Sneaky Pete’s Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 73-745.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 12, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements included in the A.T. Cross Company Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended July 3, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-3-1999
<CASH>                                          35,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,506
<INVENTORY>                                     21,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,501
<PP&E>                                         118,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,263
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,334
<SALES>                                         55,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,300
<CGS>                                           33,096
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   103
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,294)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,373)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,496
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,877)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65705-65706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32729]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.


[[Page 65706]]


Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, December 18, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered:

Discussion Agenda

    1. (a) Proposed amendments to Regulations G (Securities Credit by 
Persons Other than Banks, Brokers, or Dealers), T (Credit by Brokers 
and Dealers),U (Credit by Banks for the Purpose of Purchasing or 
Carrying Margin Stock), and X (Borrowers of Securities Credit) to 
reduce regulatory distinctions between broker-dealers, banks, and other 
lenders and to implement changes in the Board's margin authority 
contained in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 
(proposed earlier for public comment; Docket Nos. R-0905, R-0923, and 
R-0944); and (b) publication for comment of an advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking to amend Regulations T, U, and X.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

    Note: This meeting will be recorded for the benefit of those 
unable to attend. Cassettes will be available for listening in the 
Board's Freedom of Information Office, and copies may be ordered for 
$6 per cassette by calling 202-452-3684 or by writing to: Freedom of 
Information Office, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, Washington, DC 20551.

Contact Person for More Information: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 for a recorded 
announcement of this meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site 
at http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement. (The Web 
site also includes procedural and other information about the open 
meeting.)

    Dated: December 11, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32729 Filed 12-11-97; 10:36 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
| 1. | I      have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form      10-K/A of BE Aerospace, Inc.; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 2, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Amin J.      Khoury      |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                   |   | Amin      J. Khoury          |
|                   |   | Chief      Executive Officer |
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-85,898-01 & -02 & -03 & -04 & -05 & -06

EX PARTE VAN DRALAN DIXSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS 

CAUSE NOS. W13-00611-M(A) & W13-60099-M(A) & W13-60100-M(A) & 

W13-60101-M(A) & W13-60766-M(A) & W13-60767-M(A) 

IN THE 194 DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY TH

ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion.

CONCURRING OPINION

Ijoin this Court’s remand order because I agreewith its observation that applicant has alleged

facts that, “if true, might entitle him to relief.” Because applicant has pleaded a colorable

ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, Iwould orderthe habeas court on remand to appoint counsel

for him upon request if he is indigent, regardless of whether the trial court holds a hearing. See Ex

parte Pointer, 492 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016)(per curiam) (Alcala, J., concurring). 

At a minimum, however, in addition to the order’s current admonition that the appointment of

counsel is mandatory for an indigent applicant upon request if the habeas court holds a hearing, I

would include a further admonishment that an indigent applicant is “entitled” to the appointment of

counsel upon request “if the court concludes that the interests of justice require representation.” See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ART. 1.051(d). 

Filed: November 9, 2016
Dixson - 2

Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32987]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Wage Committee, Notice of Meetings

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in accordance with Pub. L. 
92-463, gives notice that meetings of the VA Wage Committee will be 
held on:

Wednesday, January 14, 1998, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, February 18, 1998, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, March 25, 1998, at 2:00 p.m.

    The meetings will be held in Room 246, Department of Veterans 
Affairs Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420.
    The Committee's purpose is to advise the Under Secretary for Health 
on the development and authorization of wage schedules for Federal Wage 
System (blue-collar) employees.
    At these meetings the Committee will consider wage survey 
specifications, wage survey data, local committee reports and 
recommendations, statistical analyses, and proposed wage schedules.
    All portions of the meetings will be closed to the public because 
the matters considered are related solely to the internal personnel 
rules and practices of the Department of Veterans Affairs and because 
the wage survey data considered by the Committee have been obtained 
from officials of private business establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence. Closure of the meetings is in 
accordance with subsection 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended by Pub. 
L. 94-409, and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (4).
    However, members of the public are invited to submit material in 
writing to the Chairperson for the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning these meetings may be obtained 
from the Chairperson, VA Wage Committee (05), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: December 11, 1997.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-32987 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### Zara L. MORRIS, Appellant, v. Harold M. MORRIS, Appellee.

No. 72-762.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 17, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.