alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
us. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation · 

Mr. Mickey Bowman 

' Vice President Essential Air Service 

Silver Airways Corp. 

1100 Lee Wagener Blvd., Suite 203 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315 

Dear Mr. Bowman: 

JUL 5 2012 

". -· .. :.. ;~ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by the Y o~ngstown-Warren · 

Regional Airport for a grant under the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community 

Air Service Development Program. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year, altbough·no more thanA awards maybe to cornn;mniti~§ in the .same_ State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types of projects that can be funded. 

On May 15, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a 

grant this year file their applications by June 11. As these grant requests are pending.before the 

Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any particular proposal. I assure you that the 

Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our normal practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Sincerely yours, 

*~ Aloha Ley 

Associate Director 

Small Community Program 
' ~ ... •. .. ~ .. 

Aviation Analysis 

rtment of Transportation 

Room WB6-310 

Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington D.C. 20590 

-···.' ' • • ~- • ' • < I ' 

Dear Ms. ley, 

Reference: Docket DOT-OST-2012-0069 

Silver Airways 

1100 lee Wagener Blvd., Suite 203 

Ft lauderdale, Fl 33315 

The Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport has submitted to the Department an application for a 2012 

Small Community Air Service Development (SCASD) Grant. 

The Airport's application-is-for f~.mding to-support· air ser\,ice at the Youngstown-Warren Regional 

. Airport. 

Silver Airways supports the Grant application of Youngstown. We are evaluating growth options for our 

new operations at Washington Dulles Airport and Youngstown is one of those growth options. 

Availability of the SCASO G;and. funding would aid our evalu~tion of that route opportunity. 

We therefore urge the Department to give the Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport Grant application 

all possible favorable consideration. 

Mickey Bow an 

Vice Presiden Essential Air Service 

Silver Airway
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2218 

To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2021 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as 

the Davis-Bacon Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Davis-Bacon Repeal 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of 

8 title 40, United States Code, is repealed. 

9 (b) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law to a 

10 wage requirement of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2218 IH

1 40, United States Code, shall after the date of the enact2 ment of this Act be null and void. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION. 

4 The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 

5 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act but 

6 shall not affect any contract in existence on such date of 

7 enactment or made pursuant to invitation for bids out8 standing on such date of enactment. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### ALL STATES MOVING & STORAGE CO. et al., Petitioners, v. William T. MAYO et al., Respondents.

No. 40351.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 8, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-3118

___________ Roberto Sanchez-Florez, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 24, 2011 Filed: June 29, 2011

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Roberto Sanchez-Florez was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture. See United States v. Sanchez-Florez , 533 F.3d 938 (8th Cir. 2008) (affirming on direct appeal). He now appeals the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, and has been granted by the district court a certificate of appeal ability (COA) on his claims of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate c ounsel. Following careful review, see Covey v. United States , 377 F.3d 903, 906 (8th Cir. 2004) (distr ict court’s denial of ineffective1 The Honorable Donald E. O’Brien, Un ited States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.assistance claim presents mixed question of law and fact; ineffective-assistance issue is reviewed de novo, but findings of underl ying predicate facts are reviewed for clear error), we agree with the district court that Sanchez-Florez did not show that he suffered prejudice as a result of deficient pe rformance by his trial or appellate counsel, most notably with regard to counsel’s efforts to impeach witnesses, seeUnited States v. Orr , 636 F.3d 944, 951-52 (8th Cir. 2011) (failu re to impeach witness constitutes ineffective assistance when there is a re asonable probability that, absent counsel’s failure, jury would have had reasonable doubt of defendant’s guilt); Sinisterra v. United States , 600 F.3d 900, 912 (8th Cir. 2010) (c laim that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise issue on appeal failed without showing of prejudice); see also Sanchez-Florez , 533 F.3d at 941 (noting overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt); Williams v. United States , 452 F.3d 1009, 1013 (8th Cir. 2006) (when determining if prejudicial deficien t performance by counsel exists, court must consider totality of evidence before judge or jury).
We also decline to expand the scope of the COA to reach additional arguments in Sanchez-Florez’s supplemental brief thathe was denied due process by the trial court’s admission of noncredi ble witness testimony, see Winfield v. Roper , 460 F.3d 1026, 1040 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant of COA requires demonstration that reasonable jurist would find district court’s ruling on constitutional claim debatable or wrong), and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
#### SHEEHAN BUICK and Corporate Group Service, Inc., Petitioners, v. Oscar FRANCIS and the Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43934.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Ferne H. WOLFE, Jr., Appellant, v. Barbara L. WOLFE, Appellee.

No. 70-143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 24, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32(b)

                          Section 1350 Certification
                                    of
                             Mark E. Maddocks

     I certify that the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation with
which this Certification is furnished fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the periodic report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Dataram Corporation.



March 9, 2007                       MARK E. MADDOCKS

                                   _______________________

                                   Mark E. Maddocks
                                   Vice President, Finance and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Centura Banks, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms
S-8 (Nos. 33-33773, 33-52160, 33-51470, 33-55926, 33-63496, 33-71198, 33-71244,
33-74706, 33-90568, 33-93404, 33-80989, 333-04949, 333-12357 and 333-08503) and
on Form S-3 (No. 33-33773) of our report dated January 6, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Centura Banks, Inc. and subsidiary (the
"Corporation") as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the
December 31, 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Centura Banks, Inc.






                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 12, 1997
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65261-65262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32375]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC98-14-000]

Southern California Edison Company Notice of Filing

December 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 3, 1997, Southern California Edison 
Company (SoCal Edison), filed an amendment to its application in the 
above-referenced proceeding. The amendment identifies the purchasers of 
SoCal Edison's generating stations at which reliability must-run units 
are located. The purchasers are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Purchaser                       Generating station     
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AES Corporation...........................  Alamitos, Huntington Beach, 
                                             and Redondo.               
Houston Industries, Inc...................  Etiwanda and Mandalay.      
A consortium consisting of: NRG Energy,     El Segundo.                 
 Inc. and Destec Energy, Inc.                                           
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before December 15, 1997. Protests 
filed with the Commission will be considered by it in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make

[[Page 65262]]

the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become 
a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32375 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 10.11

JOINT DIRECTION TO RELEASE PLEDGED INTERESTS FROM ESCROW

July 30, 2010

John Holt Smith, Esq.

Smith & Associates

415 Stunt Rd.

Calabasas, CA 91302

Dear Mr. Smith:

Reference is made to that certain Stock Pledge and Escrow Agreement (the Agreement) dated April 1, 2010, by and between
AMHN, Inc., a Nevada corporation (AMHN), Seatac Digital Resources, Inc. (Seatac) and Smith & Associates, pursuant to which Smith & Associates is holding in escrow a certain certificate representing shares of
stock (the Pledged Interests) of AMHNs subsidiary, Americas Minority Health Network, Inc.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, the undersigned, AMHN and Seatac, hereby give this joint written instruction
to Smith & Associates to deliver, as soon as practicable, from the escrow established pursuant the Agreement, share certificate number 7 representing 1,000 shares of common stock of Americas Minority Health Network, Inc. Upon delivery
of the foregoing, the undersigned hereby release Smith & Associates from any further obligation under the Agreement. The undersigned further agree to indemnify and hold Smith & Associates harmless for any action taken in accordance
with this joint written instruction.

Sincerely,

AMHN, INC.



|    |  |                                          
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------
|    |  | /s/ Robert Cambridge                     
|By: |  |                                          
|    |  | Robert Cambridge, Chief Executive Officer

SEATAC DIGITAL RESOURCES, INC.



|                         |  |                      
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|                         |  | /s/ Robin Tjon       
|By:                      |  |                      
|                         |  | Robin Tjon, President
|                        
|Acknowledged and Agreed:

AMERICAS
MINORITY HEALTH NETWORK, INC.



|    |  |                                        
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------
|    |  | /s/ Shaneeka James                     
|By: |  |                                        
|    |  | Shaneeka James, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash
flows as reported in the form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000023341
<NAME>              Congoleum Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
<CURRENCY>                                   USD
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999  
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999  
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999  
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1
<CASH>                                                  39,217
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           30,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                             3,908
<INVENTORY>                                             52,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       124,094
<PP&E>                                                 184,192
<DEPRECIATION>                                          96,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         238,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   56,552
<BONDS>                                                 99,538
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                    93
<OTHER-SE>                                              36,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           238,448
<SALES>                                                 65,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        66,120
<CGS>                                                   47,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           47,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        15,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       2,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          1,183
<INCOME-TAX>                                               446
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        737
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .08
                                               


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: The OCSE-157 Child Support Enforcement Annual Data Report.
    OMB No.: 0970-0057.
    Description: The information obtained from this form will be used 
to report child Support Enforcement activities to the Congress as 
required by law, to complete performance indicators utilized in the 
program, and to assist the Office of Child Support Enforcement in 
monitoring and evaluation State Child Support Enforcement programs. As 
of October 1, 1988 this information collection will replace the OCSE-
156 and OCSE-158.
    Respondents: State, Local or Tribal Govt.
    Annual Burden Estimates: 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            Number of     Average               
                                                               Number of    responses      burden       Total   
                         Instrument                           respondents      per       hours per      burden  
                                                                            respondent    response      hours   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCSE-157....................................................           54            1            4          216
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 216.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, Division of Information Resource 
Management Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.

OMB Comment

    OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of 
information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document 
in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having 
its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of 
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: December 16, 1997.
Bob Sargis,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-33312 Filed 12-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Exhibit 32





Certifications





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 of American General Finance Corporation as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of, Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|      | /s/                                               | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|      |                                                   | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|      | President and Chief Executive Officer             |                         
|      | /s/                                               | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      |                                                   | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |                         
|Date: | August 2, 2006                                    |                          | 





45
#### Dennis ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-412.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 6, 1972.

Alfred J. Ivie, Jr., of Howell & Ivie, Winter Haven, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and P. A. Pacyna, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled guilty to two informa-tions for robbery and was adjudged guilty and sentenced to serve two terms of twenty years each. Appellant then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and from the subsequent evidentiary hearing *52it was found that appellant’s right of direct appeal had been thwarted by state action and that he should be afforded an opportunity for full review.

Now, appellant seeks review claimingthat the only reason he pled guilty to the original charge was because the public defender stated to him that the most he would receive was five years in prison.

Costello v. State (Fla.1972) 260 So.2d 198 dealt with a similar problem. There defendant pled guilty and from his responses to the judge's inquiry it appeared that it was a free, a voluntary and a knowledgeable plea. Costello later stated that he pled guilty only because he was led to believe that he would not receive the death penalty. Obviously this did not show from the judge’s inquiry but was supported by an affidavit from Costello’s attorney. Consequently, our Supreme Court held that:

> “It is not enough for a defendant to argue that he was under an impression that a promise of a lesser penalty had been made by the judge or prosecutor. A reasonable basis for such an impression must be shown. One was shown here by court-appointed counsel’s affidavit.”

In the instant case not only is appellant’s contention unsupported by 'any affidavit but defendant’s counsel denied ever implying to defendant that he would only receive five years. Further, the record does not support any other reasonable basis for appellant’s charge of being misled. Thus the lower court holding must stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.