alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65427-65428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32471]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following

[[Page 65428]]

agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
N.W., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.
    Agreement No.: 202-010776-106.
    Title: Asia North America Rate Agreement (``ANERA'').
    Parties:

    American President Lines, Ltd.
    Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie GmbH
    Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.
    Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.
    Nippon Yusen Kaisha Line
    Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.
    P&O Nedlloyd Limited
    P&O Nedlloyd B.V.
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.

    Synopsis: The proposed modification revises Article 8.6 to provide 
that Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd., as 
affiliated companies, will have a single vote on Agreement matters. The 
parties have requested a shortened review period.

    Agreement No.: 224-201042.
    Title: Terminal Agreement between the Philadelphia Regional Port 
Authority and Tioga Fruit Terminal Inc.
    Parties: 
    Philadelphia Regional Port Authority (``Port'')
    Tioga Fruit Terminal, Inc. (``Tioga'').

    Synopsis: The proposed lease agreement authorizes the Port to grant 
Tioga exclusive use of the Tioga III Building, approximately 40,000 
square feet of refrigerated space in the Tioga II Building, certain 
yard space west of the Tioga III Building, and berthing and other 
rights through May 31, 1998.

    Dated: December 8, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Ronald D. Murphy,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32471 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### Joseph Roland CHAILLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44014.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 8, 1973.

Certiorari denied. *277*So.2d 604.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### MARINE OFFICE-APPLETON & COX CORPORATION, Appellant, v. AQUA DYNAMICS, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Alfredo CARRATALA, Petitioner, v. PITTSBUGH TESTING LABORATORY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, et al., Respondents.

No. 42635.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 8, 1972.

Certiorari dismissed.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲

▲ ★

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/03

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
Secretary Chu 

From: WEBMASTER, DOE 

Sent: 

To: 

Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:19 PM 

Secretary C h u 

Subject: Form submission from: Contact Us 

Submitted on Wed, 10/31/2012 - 20:19 

Submitted by anonymous user: [76.217.15.157] Submitted values are: 

Topic or category: Other 

Affiliation: General Public 

Subject: Northern States 90% AFUE furnaces effective 5/1/13 

Message: I understand that there maybe a "waiver system"set up for special circumstances. I 

am the president of a 60 unit condominium building. Our furnaces are located in the hallway 

in each unit. Most of the unit owners are senior citizens and cannot possibly afford to 

replace a furnace that is working fine at this time to beat the 5/1/13 deadline. Installing 

the 90% AFUE would involve major changes in the interior structure of each unit i.e. 

enlarging the current cabinet to accommodate the size of the 90% AFUE furnace, installing a 

soffett or even moving walls to accommodate the exhaust pipes. This building was built in 

1972. Having exhaust pipes sticking outside of the brick walls will certainly affect the 

appearance of the building and here again would be a costly proposition. What is the 

possibility of getting a waiver for our building? Can we be grandfathered? 

Can an exception be made? There are 385 units in the entire complex who are confronted with 

the same problem. I would appreciate whatever help you can give us. Thank you. 

Do you want a reply: Yes 

How should we respond? Email 

Email address: Marlenegreenberg@sbcglobal.net 

The results of this submission may be viewed at: 

http://energy.gov/node/268177/submission/46837 

1
#### John DANE, Jr. v. William M. JUSTICE, Jr., Clerk of Court and Doucet Brothers Construction Co., Inc.

No. 8487.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

May 10, 1978.

Roy L. Price, Metairie, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Samuel S. Dalton, Jefferson, for Doucet Bros. Construction Co., Inc., defendant-appellant.

Before SAMUEL, REDMANN and BOU-TALL, JJ.

SAMUEL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment ordering the Clerk of Court for the Parish of Jefferson to cancel and erase a notice of lis pendens from the mortgage records of his office.1

The facts are not in dispute. By act of sale dated March 5,1976 plaintiff purchased from Tomeny Construction Company, Inc. Lots 13 and 14, Square A, and Lot 30, Square B, in Harahan Oaks, a subdivision in the City of Harahan, Parish of Jefferson. Prior to that time, on January 15, 1976, Doucet Brothers Construction Company, Inc., a defendant herein, recorded the notice of lis pendens in connection with a suit filed by said Doucet Brothers against plaintiff’s vendor, Tomeny Construction, which sought specific performance of an alleged option giving Doucet Brothers the right to purchase from Tomeny Construction certain immovable property including the lots involved in this mandamus suit for cancellation and erasure.

The suit referred to in the notice is entitled *Doucet Brothers Construction Company, Inc.*v. *Tomeny Construction Company, Inc.,*La.App., 359 So.2d 712.2 In that suit we affirmed a trial court judgment dismissing Doucet Brothers’ demand.

As the suit upon which the notice of lis pendens is based has been dismissed, cancellation and erasure of that notice was proper.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. MOB 670, Folio 9; MOB 670, Folio 10.

2

. No. 8319 of our docket, handed down this day.
#### Obbie Lee HOLLIMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-419.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 31, 1972.

Obbie Lee Hollimon, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed a memorandum brief in support of his position, and on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
(see attached scope of accreditation for fields of testing and accredited test methods)

Print Date: 05/10/2011 Page 1 of 3

This is to signify that

TECO

86305 COLLEGE VIEW ROAD

EUGENE, OREGON 97405

Testing Laboratory TL-207

has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Testing Laboratories (AC89), has demonstrated compliance with 

ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005, General criteria for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, and has been 

accredited, commencing April 22, 2011, for the test methods listed in the approved scope of accreditation.

Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.

Vice President President
TECO TL-207

April 22, 2011

Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.

President

Print Date: 05/10/2011 Page 2 of 3

TECO Steven Verhey

86305 College View Rd. Technical Manager

Eugene, OR 97405 (608) 837-2790

FIELDS OF TESTING ACCREDITED TEST METHODS

Wood and wood-based products ASTM Standards C 208, C 209, C 273, C 297, C 393, D 143, D 198, D 1037, D 2395, D 

2718, D 2719, D 2915, D 3043, D 3500, D 3501, D 4442, D 5055, D 5456, D 5516, D 5582, 

D 5764, D 6007, D 6305, D 6815, E 72, E 96; E 564, E 661 and E 1333; Test methods 

referenced ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria AC14 Section 4.0 (except Sections 4.2.3 and 

4.4.2), AC47 Section 3.0 (except Section 3.5.2), AC124 Sections 3.0 and 4.0 and AC202 

Section 3.0; AS/NZS 2098.1, 2098.2, 2098.3, 2098.4, 2098.11; CSA O177; AS/NZS

2269.0 (except Section 1.10), 2269.1 and 2098.7; AITC Standard 200; ANSI Standard 

A208.1 and A208.2; Test methods referenced in ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria AC04 

Section 4.0 (excluding Sections 4.7 through 4.10) and AC182 Section 4.0; US DOC PS 1 

and PS2; CSA O325; ANSI/HPVA Standard HP-1; ANSI/APA PRP 210 and 410

Adhesives ASTM Standards D 905, D 906, D 1101, D 1151, D 1183, D 1583, D 2559, D 3535, D 

4688, D 5266, D 5572, D 5751 and D 7247; CSA Standards O112.0, O112.1 (excluding 

Sections 4.2.2, 4.2.4, 4.2.5 and 4.2.6), O112.2, O112.3, O112.4 (excluding Sections 4.2 

and 4.5.2), O112.5 (excluding Section 4.3), O112.6 (excluding Section 4.3), O112.7

(excluding Section 4.3), O112.8 (excluding Section 5.2), O112.9 (excluding Section 5.1 )

and CSA O112.10; DIN EN 15416-2
TECO TL-207

April 22, 2011

Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.

President

Print Date: 05/10/2011 Page 3 of 3

FIELDS OF TESTING ACCREDITED TEST METHODS

Deck board and guard rail systems ASTM Standards D 6109 and D 7032 (excluding Sections 4.8 and 4.9); Test methods 

referenced in ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria AC174 Sections 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 (excluding 

Sections 3.9 and 3.10)

Fasteners ASTM Standards D 1761 and F 1575
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD INDICATED AS REPORTED
ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  988,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    935,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,075,900
<PP&E>                                       2,319,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,172,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,814,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,321,300
<BONDS>                                      1,098,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       615,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,908,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,814,700
<SALES>                                      4,000,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,000,700
<CGS>                                        2,727,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,727,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                460,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   175,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            285,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   285,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.36
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from United
Investors Growth Properties II 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000862114
<NAME> UNITED INVESTORS GROWTH PROPERTIES II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           8,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,559
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,615
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,754
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (143)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.83)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(voyuer 17$)

yoddng AOU | vont pI Yas Pique oy LO/TZ/ZO
(uonqrn °2¢7$)
yoddng VaS | wort p72 Uds Tu9d L0/97/10
wonIsog
pasoddg ji ‘suosvay ‘sa addy qunoury Axyunog ayeq jeaoiddy

pivog

L007 “Te yore — | Aenuee
Sulpua’y puny Arejou0yy, [euoHEUsaU] UO Sssa1su0Z 0) JA0doy AjAdj1UN?



CNVOET1) 0102 9 dV DOG'LO-LYOUTU-OZ\SLAVHOVS

(women €-211$)

uoddng | wowesueuy Xg-purig | von c1-77 Yas woqey LO/LO/SO

AyyIORy yMorH (uor[T 7'6$)
yoddng pue uoronpey Auoaog | worl 709 AAS ose eubyng, LO/ET/P0

SOURISISSY JOTIFUOD (vor g°97$)
yoddng “80g Aoussiowg | wort s/'0¢ US uoueqoT L0/60/%0

! woNIsog
wonIsod 10 Uoseay ‘SA adky junoury Auyunog ajeq jeaoiddy
pavog

L007 ‘Og eung — | Judy
Sulpua’] pung Arejau0yy Jeuopeusajuy UO ssa1su0, 0) y10day ApA931EN\—



yoy suoneidoiddy sweisoig porepoy pue

“oaoge surerdord oy} Jo Aue 0} Aydde jou pip

‘“Suroueury Wodxg ‘suoneiedg uSto10,4 atp Jo (bp) 109 uoNDas Ul paquosap satorfod ay, *Z

quowosueLty Ag-puels :ygs
Aqyoey YyMorH pue uoyonpey AyoA0d (ADU ‘1

389]0N
wIy"60€L014/L 007d 5987 (worn Z'¢7$sn)
qu/RUD CSO yUrMMA-dHY | — yoddng AOU | vom c6lgy Yas wound | LO0Z/IZ/ZI
Way" LO0EZ01d/2007/Adjo0s7 (worn pyL$sn)
du/pewisyxe/si0 FUT MMO yoddng VaS | YON o¢'¢Lp AAS bey] LO0Z/61/Z1
un F77L01d/ L007 Ad 5087 (vont eT LISSA)
Gu7peuioy xo /si10 FUT MAMTA yoddng SOUd | VON cTy Yas ensereoin | L00Z/S0/01
yuoMIZIUNOUNY AIA 0} Yury | YHISOd “s'A odd, qunoury Ayunoy ajeq jeaoiddy
pavog

L007 ‘T€ A2quiasag ~ | 19q0799
Suypuay] puny Arejou0jq feuoHeusdzn] Uo sso13U0Z 07 x0day Ap1apNd
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000861067
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM IV - SERIES 6, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         16585
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22516
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               40296
<PP&E>                                         2006138
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1835153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          60026
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     151255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211281
<SALES>                                        186757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186757
<CGS>                                          133666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   34038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### Donald O. BEAL and Alice Beal, his wife, Appellants, v. THIRD NATIONAL BANK, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. GG-4.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 20, 1977.

*841Joseph M. Murasko, Fern Park, for appellants.

Alan B. Fields, Jr. of Dowda, Hedstrom & Fields, Palatka, and Carl Bertoch, Lutz, for appellees.

MELVIN, Judge.

Appellants-plaintiffs seek, by interlocutory appeal, reversal of an order dismissing their amended complaint as to defendant Third National Bank. The defendant had filed its motion to dismiss the second amended complaint and for a protective order. Thereafter, defendant filed supplemental motion to dismiss the complaint, alleging entitlement to the provisions of 12 U.S.C. § 94 which provides:

> “Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the United States held within the district in which such association may be established, or in any State, county, or municipal court in the county or city in which said association is located having jurisdiction in similar cases.”

Appellants urge that defendant bank waived its right to claim such venue benefits by first moving to dismiss the complaint on other grounds and moving for a protective order. We hold that the venue motion was filed in season. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.140 and *Vann v. First National Bank in Little Rock,*324 So.2d 94 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Defendant bank asserts that it has no banking facilities outside Davidson County, Tennessee. The bank timely asserted its absolute right to venue privileges pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 94. *Mercantile National Bank v. Langdeau,*371 U.S. 555, 83 S.Ct. 520, 9 L.Ed.2d 523 (1963); and *Michigan National Bank v. Robertson,*372 U.S. 591, 83 S.Ct. 914, 9 L.Ed.2d 961 (1963).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.
#### John ROBERTSON, Judge of the Municipal Court, City of Orlando, Orange County, Florida, Petitioner, v. John Merrill BRADFORD, Respondent.

No. 39235.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1970.

Joseph X. DuMond, Jr., Orlando, for petitioner.

Benjamin T. Shuman of Waterhouse & Shuman, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, to review the decision of that Court certified as passing on a question of great public interest.1 The question certified is whether a person charged in Municipal Court with driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of a municipal ordinance, is entitled to trial by jury.2 This Court has answered the question certified in the negative in Smith v. Davis, opinion filed February 4, 1970.3 We note, however, that the question presented by this case, as well as by the Smith v. Davis and Robertson v. State ex rel. Harty cases,4 deserves the attention of the Florida Legislature.

Accordingly, the decision of the District Court is quashed and the cause remanded for further consideration in the light of this Court’s decision in Smith v. Davis, supra.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., dissents.

1

. 227 So.2d 346 (Fla.App.4th 1969).

2

. See F.S. § 322.262(4) (1967), F.S.A.

3

. Fla., 231 So.2d 517 (Opinion filed February 4, 1970).

4

. Fla., 233 So.2d 633, opinion filed April 1, 1970.