alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Jeffrey S. Burge and Anthony J. Pearl, or any of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Nevada Property 1 LLC for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or
she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or her substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This Power of Attorney shall be effective from the date on which it
is signed until May 31, 2011.



|                      |  |  |  |                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------
|/s/ THOMAS FIATO      |  |  |  | Date: March 21, 2011
|Thomas Fiato          |  |  |  |                     
|                      |  | 
|/s/ JEFF BAER         |  |  |  | Date: March 21, 2011
|Jeff Baer             |  |  |  |                     
|                      |  | 
|/s/ STUART CLARKE     |  |  |  | Date: March 21, 2011
|Stuart Clarke         |  |  |  |                     
|                      |  | 
|/s/ DONNA MILROD      |  |  |  | Date: March 21, 2011
|Donna Milrod          |  |  |  |                     
|                      |  | 
|/s/ FABRIZIO CAMPELLI |  |  |  | Date: March 21, 2011
|Fabrizio Campelli     |  |  |  |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michele Pergolizzi, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 849]

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, plea vacated and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c]). We agree with defendant that her purported waiver of the right to appeal was ineffective. Such a waiver was never mentioned during the plea colloquy and thus was not part of the plea bargain, and at sentencing Supreme Court mentioned only that defendant would be signing a waiver of the right to appeal. Because the court failed to conduct a sufficient inquiry *959concerning defendant’s understanding of the waiver of the right to appeal, this Court is unable to determine whether such waiver was knowing, intelligent or voluntary *(see, People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 283). We further agree with defendant that the court erred in accepting her plea. Assuming, arguendo, that defendant failed to preserve for our review her challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution, we conclude that preservation was not necessary where, as here, defendant’s recitation of the underlying facts negated an essential element of the crime and the court failed to make further inquiry to ensure that the plea was knowing and voluntary *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666). Here, when the prosecutor asked defendant whether she was intoxicated, defendant stated that she believed her ability was impaired. That was an implicit denial of an essential element of the crime, i.e., intoxication. The court thus erred in accepting the plea without conducting further inquiry *(see, People v Lopez, supra,*at 666). We therefore reverse the judgment of conviction, vacate the plea, and remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the indictment. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.
#### ORSI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. CONCRETE FABRICATORS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-420.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 16, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40938

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERONIMO FERNANDO HUEZO-FRANCO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-215-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Geronimo Fernando Huezo-Franco appeals his conviction and

sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. 

Huezo argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony”

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional

in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Huezo’s argument concerning the

constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is, as he concedes,

foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.
No. 04-40938

-2-

224, 235 (1998); United States v. Izaguirre-Flores, 405 F.3d 270,

277-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 253 (2005).

Huezo also contends that his sentence is improper under

Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), and United States

v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). He concedes that the plainerror standard of review applies. Huezo has not shown that the

district court would have imposed a different sentence under an

advisory sentencing scheme. Thus, Huezo has not shown plain

error in connection with his sentence. See United States v.

Martinez-Lugo, 411 F.3d 597, 600-01 (5th Cir. 2005), cert.

denied, ___ S. Ct. ___ (Oct. 11, 2005) (No. 05-6242).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
S:\CHARTS\3Q-REPORT.12.Docx October 2, 2012 (10:37 AM)

Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending 

July 1 – September 30, 2012

Board 

Approval Date Country Amount Type U.S. 

Position

Background

07/06/2012 Tanzania SDR149.175 million

($224.9 million)

SCF Support http://www.imf.org/external/np/

sec/pr/2012/pr12252.htm

07/20/2012 São Tomé and Príncipe SDR2.59 million

($3.9 million)

ECF Support http://www.imf.org/external/np/

sec/pr/2012/pr12272.htm

07/23/2012 Malawi SDR104.1 million

($156.2 million)

ECF Support http://www.imf.org/external/np/

sec/pr/2012/pr12273.htm

08/03/2012 Jordan SDR1.364 billion

($2.06 billion)

SBA Support http://www.imf.org/external/np/

sec/pr/2012/pr12288.htm

09/26/2012 Bosnia and Herzegovina €405.3 million

($520.6 million)

SBA Support http://www.imf.org/external/np/

sec/pr/2012/pr12366.htm
#### William JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 10, 1972.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against, charged with robbery. He was tried by a jury and found and adjudged guilty. On appeal therefrom the appellant argues the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, and specifically that the evidence related to identification of the defendant was insufficient to support the verdict against him. On examination of the record we are impelled to the conclusion that the contention is without merit. Three witnesses who were in close proximity to the defendant at the time of the robbery identified him at trial. No useful purpose would be served by detailing the evidence. We hold the evidence presented was sufficient to support the conviction and judgment.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of iGambit, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Salerno, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By:
/s/ John SalernoJohn SalernoPrincipal Executive Officer




March 31, 2011
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2447 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 

for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student loan 

repayment or forgiveness programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2021 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. SCHRADER, and Mr. 

JOHNSON of South Dakota) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for an exclusion for assistance provided to participants 

in certain veterinary student loan repayment or forgiveness programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterinary Medicine 

5 Loan Repayment Program Enhancement Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2447 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PAR2 TICIPANTS IN CERTAIN VETERINARY STU3 DENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 

4 PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘such Act,’’; 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert9 ing ‘‘, under section 1415A of the National Agricul10 tural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act 

11 of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or under any other State 

12 loan repayment or loan forgiveness program that is 

13 intended to provide for increased access to veteri14 nary services in such State.’’; and 

15 (3) by striking ‘‘STATE’’ in the heading and in16 serting ‘‘OTHER’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to amounts received by an indi19 vidual in taxable years beginning after December 31, 

20 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Treasury approves Indiana’s plan to invest $199.8 million of CPF funding 

in broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-speed internet 

to locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Indiana

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $199.8 million for Broadband Infrastructure (100% of CPF

program allocation)

 Locations to Be Served: 55,349 (estimated)

 Program Description: Indiana’s Next Level Connections

Broadband Grant Program (NLC) is a competitive grant

program designed to provide funding to extend broadband 

infrastructure and service to areas and locations currently

lacking access to at least 25/3 Mbps.

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: Indiana Broadband Office; Office of Community and Rural Affairs

Treasury previously approved CPF funding for NLC on August 30, 2022. On December 20, 2022, Treasury approved 

Indiana’s plan to fund another round of the NLC grant program, increasing the total award amount from $187M 

to $203M. This fact sheet reflects these changes.

Indiana Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Indiana, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~8% of locations still 

lacking high-speed internet 

access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
#### Joseph ARMBRUSTER and Martha Anne Armbruster, Appellants, v. Dorothy B. FLYNN, Appellee.

No. 73-1397.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In the Matter of David Medina, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[735 NYS2d 831]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from making threats. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we find that the misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see, Matter of Crews v O’Keefe,*283 AD2d 692; *Matter of Pryce v Goord,*281 AD2d 665). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### OLD FIRE HOUSE RESTAURANT AND DRIVE-IN, INC., Appellant, v. HYGEIA COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, Appellee.

No. Q-395.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 14, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the annual report of Loncor Resources Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter N. Cowley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)      The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      The information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|               |    
|-------------- | ---
|March 30, 2012 | By:
|               |    





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Loncor Resources Inc. and will be retained by Loncor Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-34; RM-8938]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Saint Paul, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 287A to Saint Paul, Arkansas, as 
that community's first local aural transmission service in response to 
a petition filed on behalf of Saint Paul Broadcasting. See 62 FR 4225, 
January 29, 1997. Coordinates used for Channel 287A at Saint Paul, 
Arkansas, are 35-48-14 and 93-37-00. With this action, the proceeding 
is terminated.

DATES: Effective January 20, 1998. A filing window for Channel 287A at 
Saint Paul, Arkansas, will not be opened at this time. Instead, the 
issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by 
the Commission in a subsequent Order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180. Questions related to the window application filing process 
should be addressed to the Audio Services Division, (202) 418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 97-34, adopted November 5, 1997, and 
released December 5, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arkansas, is 
amended by adding Saint Paul, Channel 287A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-32707 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
#### DIAMOND NOVELTIES, INC., Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, and Ketty Fernandez, Respondents.

No. 69-759.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
IFC Investment in PetroNova Colombia

August 30, 2012

U.S. Position

The United States carefully reviewed this proposed investment in PetroNova for its implications 

for the Colombian economy and environment, the sponsor’s access to finance, and the current 

state of hydrocarbon markets in the region. The United States believes the development impact 

from this investment is not of the highest caliber. Moreover, the United States is not convinced 

about whether the proper level of due diligence has been performed with respect to the 

environmental impact assessment. 

The United States wishes to acknowledge that the Colombian economy and society have made 

great strides in recent years. Colombia has benefited greatly from the improved security 

environment and closer trade ties with larger economies. Important for this proposal, the United 

States recognizes that opening the Colombian hydrocarbons market to private sector investment 

was a huge step forward for the economy and required substantial political capital. For these 

reasons, the United States believes Colombia is moving in all the correct directions. 

That being said, the United States believes that the IFC can be more ambitious in the design of 

its proposals. Colombia has the fifth largest proven oil reserve base in South America. 

Colombia's oil and mining sectors are already attracting significant private investment, even in 

some of the riskiest parts of the country, despite an uptick in pipeline attacks by the 

paramilitaries/guerrillas in recent months. Although it is true that the IFC’s investment applies

the IFC Performance Standards to this project, the United States has difficulty agreeing that from 

a development perspective this is the best use of IFC’s limited resources.

The United States disagrees with the environmental impact categorization as level “B”, or 

limited impact. This project has large potential impacts on biodiversity, protected reserves and 

critical habitats, as well as large potential social impacts. Moreover, it is likely that full scale 

production development will occur as a result of this exploration project; as such, the United 

States believes a cumulative impact assessment should be undertaken to assess reasonably 

foreseeable potential expansion as a result of that likely scale up. Given these considerations, the 

United States believes the environmental impact should have been categorized as “A”. 

Consistent with the legislative mandate pertaining to disclosure of projects that are likely to 

result in significant impacts on the environment, and because the United States disagrees with 

IFC management about the strength of the development impact of this project, the United States 

wishes to be recorded as abstaining on the proposed investment in PetroNova Inc.
254 La. 769

#### Frank Harold LINDSAY v. The LUMMUS COMPANY et al.

No. 49968.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Frank Harold Lindsay applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 222 So.2d 549.

Application denied. The result is correct.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 20, 2023. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 20, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A23A1686. ALLEN SCOTT REEVES v. BUTTS COUNTY.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the annual
period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr., as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of
my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|/s/ Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr. |                                                  | 
|-------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|Name:                      | Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr.                           | 
|Title:                     | Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board | 



Date: March 7, 2017
257 La. 601

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. James B. McPHERSON, Jr.

No. 51091.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 1971.

In re: James B. McPherson, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Madison. 241 So.2d 543.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

DIXON, J., recused.