alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thos. E. Capps, President and Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2003 and for the period then ended.





|/s/ Thos. E. CappsThos. E. Capps
President and Chief Executive Officer 
May 9, 2003
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Consolidated Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Consolidated Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Eileen C. Tichy LAURITZEN v. Frank X. LAURITZEN.

No. 45366.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 19, 1969.

Watkins, Pyle, Edwards, Ludlam, Winter & Stennis, William A. Pyle, Jackson, for appellant.

O. B. Triplett, Jr., Forest, Rufus Creek-more, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the 10-Q Report), that:



| | (1) | The 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of August 12, 2010.



/s/ Russell D. HallRussell D. HallPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Dennis T. NelsonDennis T. NelsonChief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


A
signed original of this Certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Edward E. BETTIS, Jr., Karen Fandal, Robert Bettis and Rita Tregre, Appellants, v. ESTATE of Edward E. BETTIS, Deceased, Appellee.

No. DD-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 12, 1977.

Nathaniel Dedmond, Pensacola, for appellants.

W. A. Swann, Jr., Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of an order granting final summary judgment on behalf of Malcolm Garrett. Appellants have filed an action contesting the validity of a will executed by one Edward E. Bettis, now deceased, on the ground that at the time of the will’s execution Mr. Bettis was of unsound mind and subject to undue influence on behalf of Garrett. The testimony relied upon by the court in granting the motion for summary judgment was conflicting as to both issues. We cannot agree with the court on the basis of the record before us that there were no disputed issues of any material facts. The testimony is clearly conflicting as to the material issues presented. The final summary judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
## SERVED: March 7, 2016
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS
In The Matter Of: NORTHEASTERN AVIATION CORPORATION Respondent 

### WASHINGTON, DC ) 

### ) ) ) 

### ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2015-0206
CaseNo. 2011EA110045


### ORDERSETTING SECOND PRE-HEARING STATUS CONFERENCE
On June 18, 2015, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures ("Order") was filed. Among otherthings, this Order set a telephone Motion/Pre-Hearing Status Conference for Monday, March 7, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. Easterntime. OnMarch 7, 2016, the parties appearedby.telephone for a Pre-Hearing Status Conference. Duringthis Conference, the parties agreed to privately confer aboutthe case, and then appear for a second Pre-Hearing Status Conference onTuesday, March 22, 2016. This order codifies the parties' March 7, 2016 agreement and the Court's oral rulings. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205, and having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised;


### ITIS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. .The parties shall privately conferby telephone aboutthe status ofthe case and possible settlement onMarch 18, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time. The FAA shall initiate the telephone call. 2. The parties shall appearbytelephone for a Second Pre-Hearing Status Conference on Tuesday, 

### March

### 22,2016, at 

### 2:30p.m. Eastern time. To access the Court's conference line, the parties shall call202-493-2343.3. For clarifications ofthis Order orquestions with regard to the procedures to be followed inthis case, please contact Mrs. Rachel Brown, Judicial StaffAssistant, at the Office ofHearings (202-366-2132).

Attachment: Service List

Page 2 of2

### DocketNo. FAA-2015-0206 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591

.Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Ms. Camille J. Castillo Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3278 FAX: 718-995-5699 

### Mr. Edward J. Longosz, II Ms. Evelyn D. Sahr Respondent's Counsel 

### ONE COPY

Eckert, Seamans, Cherin, & 

### Mellot, LLC 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 1200 Washington, D.C. 20006 TEL: 202-659-6619 

### I 202-659-6622 FAX: 202-659-6699 Judge J.E. Sullivan US. Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Room Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 10.4


 


Cactus Acquisition Corp. 1 Limited


4B Cedar Brook Drive


Cranbury, NJ 08512


 


May 21, 2021


Cactus Healthcare Management LP


4B Cedar Brook Drive


Cranbury, NJ 08512


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing
on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for
the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of Cactus Acquisition Corp.’s (the “Company”) securities and continuing
until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in
each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
Cactus Healthcare Management LP shall, or shall cause its affiliates to, make available to the Company certain office space, utilities,
secretarial support and other administrative support and services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 4B
Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ 08512 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Cactus Healthcare Management
LP the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Cactus Healthcare
Management LP hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set
aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with
the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     

    


 


		Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Cactus Acquisition Corp. 1 Limited
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Ofer Gonen
	 	 	Name: 	Ofer Gonen
	 	 	Title:	 Chief Executive Officer



 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


Cactus Healthcare
Management LP


 


	By: 	Cactus Healthcare Management LLC,	 
	 	its sole General Partner


 


	By: 	/s/ Stephen T. Wills	 
	 	Name: 	 Stephen T. Wills	 
	 	Title: 	Secretary	 


 


[Signature
Page to Administrative Services Agreement]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1190-DR]


Nebraska; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Nebraska, (FEMA-1190-DR), dated November 1 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Nebraska, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of November 1, 1997:

    Dodge County for Category F under the Public Assistance program 
(already designated for Categories A and B under the Public 
Assistance program).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-32781 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Advocacy Filings Tagged with Health Claims
  


  Sobrescribir enlaces de ayuda a la navegación
      Inicio
                                                                        AdvocacyView this page in English Possible Anticompetitive Barriers to E-Commerce: Contact Lenses: A Report from the Staff of the FTC (1  de Mar de 2004
 )
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 19-20846 

Conference Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Kevin Raheem Penn, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:19-CR-377-1 

Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Kevin Raheem Penn has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and supplemental brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Penn has filed responses. We have 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

June 18, 2021 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 19-20846 Document: 00515905890 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2021
No. 19-20846 

2 

reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant parts of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Penn’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment 

that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, Penn’s motions to appoint new counsel and to hold the case in 

abeyance are both DENIED; counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED; counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein; and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 19-20846 Document: 00515905890 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,536
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,252
<INVENTORY>                                     51,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,266
<PP&E>                                          73,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,894
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,363
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,619
<SALES>                                         59,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,338
<CGS>                                           38,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                       453
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                684
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       684
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
#### Alfred Lee BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-385.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 26, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64765-64766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32195]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 900124-0127; I.D. 112897E]


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Surf Clam 
and Ocean Quahog Fishery; Minimum Clam Size for 1998

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Suspension of surf clam minimum size limit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS informs the public that the minimum size limit of 4.75 
inches (12.07 cm) for Atlantic surf clams is suspended for the 1998 
fishing year. The intended effect is to relieve the industry from a 
regulatory burden that is not necessary as the vast majority of surf 
clams harvested are larger than the minimum size limit.

DATES: January 1, 1998, through December 31, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myles Raizin, Fishery Policy Analyst, 
508-281-9104.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 648.72(c) of the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Atlantic Surf Clam and Ocean Quahog Fisheries (FMP) allows 
the Regional Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS, to suspend annually 
by publication of an announcement in the Federal Register, the minimum 
size limit for Atlantic surf clams. This action

[[Page 64766]]

may be taken unless discard, catch, and survey data indicate that 30 
percent of the Atlantic surf clam resource is smaller than 4.75 inches 
(12.07 cm) and the overall reduced size is not attributable to beds 
where growth of the individual clams has been reduced because of 
density-dependent factors.
    At its August 1997 meeting, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council (Council) accepted the recommendations of its Scientific and 
Statistical Committee and Surf Clam/Ocean Quahog Committee and voted to 
recommend that the Regional Administrator suspend the minimum size 
limit for surf clams in 1998. Commercial surf clam shell length data 
for 1997 indicate that only 15.25 percent of the samples were composed 
of surf clams that were less than 4.75 inches (12.07 cm). Based on 
these data, the Regional Administrator adopts the Council's 
recommendation and publishes this announcement to suspend the minimum 
size limit for Atlantic surf clams for the period January 1, 1998, 
through December 31, 1998.
     This action is authorized by 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 3, 1997.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-32195 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXHIBIT      32.0

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 21, 2007                (the                “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of                the                Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                               |   |   |                                                                         |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/                Renato Cataldo                  |   |   | /s/                Gary W. Douglass                                          |   |
| Renato                Cataldo                      |   |   | Gary                W. Douglass                                              |   |
| President              and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Executive                Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |   |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Final Review Criterion for Grants for Primary Care Training 
Programs for Fiscal Year 1998

    Grants for Primary Care Training programs are authorized under 
sections 747(a) and (b), 748, 750 and 751, title VII of the Public 
Health Service Act, as amended by the Health Professions Education 
Extension Amendments of 1992, Pub. L. 102-408, dated October 13, 1992. 
These grant programs include:

Grants for Predoctoral Training in Family Medicine
Grants for Faculty Development in Family Medicine
Grants for Graduate Training in Family Medicine
Grants for Establishment of Departments of Family Medicine
Grants for Residency Training in General Internal Medicine and 
General Pediatrics
Grants for Faculty Development in General Internal Medicine and 
General Pediatrics
Grants for Physician Assistant Training
Grants for Podiatric Primary Care Residency Training

    A notice was published in the Federal Register at 62 FR 46502 on 
September 3, 1997, for a review criterion for the above-referenced 
programs. No comments were received within the 30 day comment period. 
Therefore, the review criterion remains as proposed.

Final Review Criterion

    The following criterion has been added to the existing review 
criteria established in 61 FR 52034 on October 4, 1996:
    5. Project impact/influence in shaping the curriculum, program, 
department, institution and the community.
    The review criterion is finalized in this combined notice, rather 
than individual program announcements, to provide consistent review of 
all primary care medical education grant applications.
    If additional information is needed, please contact: Enrique 
Fernandez, M.D., Division of Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, 
Health Resources and Services Administration, Parklawn Building, Room 
9A-20, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone: (301) 
443-1467, FAX: (301) 443-8890.

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
Claude Earl Fox,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-32280 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P