alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2410 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2410

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the 
inclusion of information on prior authorization requirements and other 
 utilization management techniques in the Medicare & You annual notice.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

 Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. O'Halleran) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the 
inclusion of information on prior authorization requirements and other 
 utilization management techniques in the Medicare & You annual notice.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare & You Handbook Improvement 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING THE INCLUSION OF INFORMATION ON PRIOR AUTHORIZATION 
              REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES 
              IN THE MEDICARE & YOU ANNUAL NOTICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1804(c) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395b-2(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) a description of the types of prior authorization 
        requirements and any other utilization management techniques 
        that may apply under this title, including information on how 
        an individual may find out which such requirements and 
        techniques (if any) apply under a Medicare Advantage plan or a 
        prescription drug plan.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to notices distributed on or after January 1, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
#### Howard N. CRAWFORD, Jr. v. O. H. DESHOTELS et al.

No. 61159.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Frankie Boutte McDaniel and 0. H. Deshotels, Jr. applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Vermilion. 351 So.2d 295.

Granted. It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
256 La. 778

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Andrew J. CARIERE.

No. 50875.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1970.

In re: Andrew J. Cariere applying for writs of certiorari.

Writ refused. The application is premature. Applicant has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction. See Article 703, Comment (g) Code Criminal Proc.
No. 00-7171.

#### Lewis *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mario Alberto RENTERIA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50663.

D.C. No. CR-01-00306-NAJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 19, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Mario Renteria appeals his conviction, pursuant to a stipulated facts agreement and trial, and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Renteria’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Renteria did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. *859346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

## NOV 1 0..20f4

Mr. Tim Bilic BombardierAerospace 400 Cote-Vertu Road West Dorval, Quebec, H4S 1 Y9 CANADA Dear Mr. Bilic: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, Washington 98057-3356

We have received yourpetition letter dated October 30, 2014, requesting exemption from § 25.809(a), ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. This exemption, ifgranted, would permit relieffrom the requirement to view the ground contact area under all lighting and landing gear conditions for over-wing passenger exits for Global 7000/8000 airplane models BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13. This request was submitted to the Department ofTransportation's Federal Docket Management System (at Regulations.gov) onNovember 5, 2014, and has been assigned DocketNo. FAA-2014-0932. We are currently reviewing your request and will contact you ifwe need additional information. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition orthe petition process, please contact Mr. Alan Sinclair by telephone at (425) 227-2195, or by e-mail at Alan.Sinclair@faa.gov. Sincerely,

DeanaM. Stedman Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service



## COPY OF ORIGINAL
No. 00-7572.

#### Esquivel-Morelos *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
-78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/06 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.46 N 76.63 WMeters AGL
(AWL0:11) 0107 ‘9 1udy 90C'r0' LYOdaTa-OF\SLAVHO\:S

(wort 'pgssn)
AOA | VOUT 66'rS YAS 080) Jo onqndey r0/90/Z1
(uoyput pss)
aourisissy Aoussiawg | uorINU €6'7 YAS epeualn vO/ST/IL
UOHISOg 10} UOseay addy, qunoury Ayuunop ajeq jeaoiddy

pavog

$007 ‘LE Aoquiesaq — | 19qQ0}99
Sulpua’y pung Arejau0yy [euoHEUII}U] UO ssa.1su0, 0) JA0day A}.19}1eN?


(000000‘s09$)

yoddng VS | 000‘009'I Tr uas ouresyy) 0/67/€0
ssaooy | (000°000'81$)
yoddng payuausny — AOYd | 00000771 Yas Jeosesepe vO/LI/€0
(000°009‘L0I$)
uoddng ADUd | 000007 IZ yas seinpuoy 0/81/Z0
(000°000‘r01$)
upny ArenpyA, | uresqy ADUd | 00000¢'69 uas Ipunng, PO/EZ/T0
WORIsOg
uOHISOg 10} uosvay ‘sn addy, qunoury Ayunog ajeq jeaoiddy
pivog

$007 ‘TE qo4ey — | Arenuer
surpuey pung A1eyaU0y, [euoHvUAI}UT UO ssa.18u0Z 0} j10day Aja9}.18Nd



‘(dSUd) tedeg ASareng uononpsy Auaaog sanbiquezoy, jo
uodar ssaidord ysny ay) Jo MatAar Preog SAHNaxY SyUeE POA ay) SurmoyJoy puny ayy Aq paidope uorstoop sayzry e uodn SAT OajJe otuedaq JUNUASUBLIE OY] +

(000‘002‘€1$)

aaorddy dDud | 000‘0EE'6 Yas yew! — poez/90
(000°009‘91$)

aaoiddy +ADUd | 0000911 Yas anbiquezow | 0/17/90
(000°0Ir‘0zEs)

aaoiddy ADUd | 000‘s60'0zz NAS eiquez! — $0/P1/90
(000°008‘zzr$)

aaoiddy VaS | 000‘00¢‘L8z yas neg] 40/60/90
(000‘000‘rr1$)

saorddy ADAd | 000‘000'86 Yas eI81005 | 0/40/90
(000°000°Zo I$)

aaoiddy VaS | 000‘0rr‘69 UAS uogey | —0/8Z/S0

uOonIsog

‘sa yunoury Ayunog ajeqg jeaoiddy

pievog

$007 ‘O€ Pung — Te youey
Sulpuay puny Aaeyau0j] [euoHeUAI}O] UO ssa1BU0D 03 A0day ApAd}AVNd


CNY 90:11) 0107 ‘9 ud 2040 LUOdAT-O\ 1 ESOXAEN OPM Woy sayy JausorUy Arerodw [\sFunjag [eoo7]\suosiay[oy\ssumeg puy sjwoumsoq\:>

(000‘00¢‘9Er$)
oaoiddy VOda | 000‘001‘L6z Yas bely $0/67/60
(000'000‘9r 1s)
saoiddy Vas | 000°000‘001 was Buesng 40/90/80
(000‘00€' Ir I$)
saoiddy Vas | _000°000°L6 was BABI Jo o1qndoy ¥0/r0/80
(000°00z‘8$) ougqnday
oaoiddy Voda | _000‘0Ls‘s was ueouyy Tenuad PO/ET/LO
OdIH peoueyug
Jopuy] sourjsissy (000‘002‘I$) o8u0g ay] Jo
aaoiddy WILE EUOHIPPW | _OOO‘TET‘T US oiiqndoy oneisoweq y0/Z1/L0
(000‘000‘L9¢$)
saoiddy Vas | 000°000‘0sz uas eruewioy PO/LO/LO
wontsog
WOHIsOg 10; Uoseay ‘sa adcy, qunoury Anunod a3eq Jeaoiddy
pivog

F007 ‘OE tequiaydag ~ { Ajne
Surpusy] pung Arejou0y [euoHeUsazU] Uo ssasBu03 0) roday Ayzaqend
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66069-66070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-114-000]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

December 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 4, 1997, K N Interstate Gas 
Transmission Co. (Applicant), P.O. Box 281304, Lakewood, Colorado 
80228, filed in Docket No. CP98-114-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act for authorization to construct and operate thirteen new 
delivery taps, under blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-140-
000, et al.,\1\ all as more fully set forth in the request for 
authorization on file with the Commission and open for public 
inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See, 22 FERC para. 62,330 (1983).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Applicant proposes to construct thirteen new delivery taps located 
in Adams, Antelope, Buffalo, Custer, Pierce, and Sherman Counties, 
Nebraska and Kearny County, Kansas, which will be added as delivery 
points under an existing transportation agreement between Applicant and 
K N Energy Inc. (KNE). These proposed delivery points will be used by 
KNE to facilitate the delivery of natural gas to direct retail sales 
customers.
    Applicant certifies that (1) the volumes of gas which will be 
delivered at these proposed delivery points will be within the current 
maximum transportation quantities set forth in Applicant's 
transportation service agreement with KNE; (2) the addition of the 
proposed delivery points is not prohibited by Applicant's existing FERC 
Gas Tariff; and (3) the addition of the proposed delivery points will 
not have any adverse impact, on a daily or annual basis, upon 
Applicant's existing customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice

[[Page 66070]]

of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the Regulations 
under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the proposed 
activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the 
time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not 
withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32833 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered November 25 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00938
- CV
IN RE L.C. AKA S.R.M., Relator Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial Dis trict Cou rt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 20
- 07925
- Y

O RDER Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Evans
Before the Court is relator’s October 28, 2020 petition f or writ of mandamus
and request for emergency relief . We GRANT relator’s request to the e xtent t hat

we STAY the trial court from issuing any orders that would resul t in the child ’ s placement with real party in interes t. This stay shall remain in effect pending resolution of this original proceeding. The Court requests real party in interest a nd respo ndent to file a response, if any, to the petition for wri t of mandamus by December 14, 2020
.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                       153
<INVENTORY>                                     22,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,276
<PP&E>                                          29,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,678
<BONDS>                                         16,087
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,385
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,127
<SALES>                                         24,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,552
<CGS>                                           15,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (125)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (191)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (191)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-60445

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

$536,039.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,

 Defendant,

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MANLEY CARGILL,

 Claimant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:90CV226GR

- - - - - - - - - -

May 7, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manley W. Cargill, federal inmate #41436-004 appeals the

district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to set

aside a default judgment in an action for forfeiture in rem. This

court reviews a district court’s decision denying such relief for
No. 96-60445

-2-

abuse of discretion. Matter of Dierschke, 975 F.2d 181, 183 (5th

Cir. 1992). Because Cargill has failed to establish standing to

challenge the forfeiture of the currency, the district court did

not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to set aside the

default judgment. See United States v. $321,470 U.S. Currency, 874

F.2d 298, 303 (5th Cir. 1989).

AFFIRMED.
#### Stanley BAUMANN, Myron J. Singer, and Contract Construction-Siba Properties, a partnership, Appellants, v. Mario SILVESTRI, d/b/a Silvestri Builders, Inc., Appellee.

No. 70-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 12, 1970.

An interlocutory appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Raymond G. Nathan, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 262 

To prohibit the imposition of the death penalty for any violation of Federal 

law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2021 

Ms. PRESSLEY (for herself, Ms. ADAMS, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Ms. BASS, Mrs. 

BEATTY, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. 

BOWMAN, Mr. BROWN, Ms. BUSH, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Ms. CLARK of 

Massachusetts, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. COOPER, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. DEAN, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. EVANS, Mr. GARCI ́A

of Illinois, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. JOHNSON

of Georgia, Mr. JONES, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. 

GOMEZ, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. LIEU, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. MALINOWSKI, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. NORTON, Ms. 

OCASIO-CORTEZ, Ms. OMAR, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. POCAN, 

Mr. RASKIN, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SARBANES, Ms. SCANLON, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mr. THOMPSON

of Mississippi, Ms. TLAIB, Mrs. TRAHAN, Mr. TRONE, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. WELCH, and Ms. WILD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the imposition of the death penalty for any 

violation of Federal law, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 262 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Death Penalty 

3 Prohibition Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF DEATH SEN5 TENCE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, no person may be sentenced to death or put 

8 to death on or after the date of enactment of this Act 

9 for any violation of Federal law. 

10 (b) PERSONS SENTENCED BEFORE DATE OF ENACT11 MENT.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 

12 person sentenced to death before the date of enactment 

13 of this Act for any violation of Federal law shall be resen14 tenced. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                        93
<INVENTORY>                                     30,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,384
<PP&E>                                          27,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,314
<BONDS>                                         17,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,357
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,683
<SALES>                                         51,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,528
<CGS>                                           33,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (502)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (769)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (769)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Supplemental Information
 To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
 OFS Capital Corporation:
 We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities of OFS Capital Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company), including the consolidated schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated March 13, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
 The senior securities information as of December 31, 2019 included in Part II, Item 5 of the Annual Report on Form 10‐K of the Company under the caption “Senior Securities” (the senior securities table) has been subjected to audit procedures performed in conjunction with the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The senior securities table is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our audit procedures included determining whether the senior securities table reconciles to the Company’s consolidated financial statements or the underlying accounting and other records, as applicable, and performing procedures to test the completeness and accuracy of the information presented in the senior securities table. In forming our opinion on the senior securities table, we evaluated whether the senior securities table, including its form and content, is presented in conformity with the instructions to Form N‐2. In our opinion, the senior securities table as of December 31, 2019, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated financial statements as a whole.
 
 /s/KPMG LLP
 Chicago, Illinois
 March 13, 2020