alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                            <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-28-1996             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-28-1996             SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                             68,645                 128,085
<SECURITIES>                    0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,258,649               1,108,132
<ALLOWANCES>                       77,050                  84,213
<INVENTORY>                     2,788,654               2,376,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                4,109,348               3,567,003
<PP&E>                          5,332,622               4,067,865
<DEPRECIATION>                  2,235,079               2,193,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,257,623               5,491,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,472,438               1,994,975
<BONDS>                         1,678,728                 851,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0                       0
<PREFERRED>                     0                       0
<COMMON>                        1,186,192               1,064,193
<OTHER-SE>                      1,398,984               1,104,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    7,257,623               5,491,026
<SALES>                        12,498,993              12,115,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               12,666,978              12,240,378
<CGS>                           8,982,259               8,734,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  11,902,279              11,667,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  341,797                 316,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0                            2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                209,124                 184,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   422,902                 388,782
<INCOME-TAX>                      132,673                 132,782
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               422,902                 388,782
<DISCONTINUED>                  0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0                       0
<CHANGES>                       0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                      290,229                 256,588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .06                     .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .06                     .04


</TABLE>
#### Margaret FRYE and Edward L. Frye, her husband, Appellants, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, and Lewis L. Dinius, Appellees.

No. 73-213.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Buford J. COUNTS and Gerald Finney, doing business as Juno Beach Fishing Pier, Appellant, v. John McGILLICK, Appellee.

No. 71-614.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 4, 1972.

Kirk Sullivan, of Sullivan & Robinson, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Evelyn R. Flack and John T. Christian-sen, of Law Offices of Ronald Sales, Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS, J., and JOHNSON, CLARENCE T., Associate Judge, concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting):

I respectfully dissent. Plaintiff was a business invitee and slipped and fell upon defendant’s fishing pier. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. I would reverse and remand for a new trial because the judgment was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.

Plaintiff flatly did not know what caused his fall or how he fell. This must be inferred. In addition the dangerous condition, its origin, responsibility for it, and length of time that same existed were not proven and must be somehow inferred. All in all, plaintiff’s case simply rests upon a series of impermissible pyramided inferences and defendant’s negligence was not established as a matter of law. Suspicion and mere conjecture are not adequate foundations for a tort judgment.

I would reverse for a new trial.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28934]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 62 FR 55644, 
October 27, 1997.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 10:00 A.M. 
Wednesday, October 29, 1997.

CANCELLATION OF THE MEETING: Notice is hereby given of the cancellation 
of the Board of Directors meeting scheduled for October 29, 1997.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.
William W. Ginsberg,
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 97-28934 Filed 10-28-97; 1:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
```
Exhibit 12   SPRINGLEAF FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)    (dollars in thousands)Successor
CompanyPredecessor
CompanyThree Months Ended March 31,20112010Earnings:
Loss before benefit from income taxes$ (87,324)$ (38,623)Interest expense350,633256,993Implicit interest in rents3,4353,708Total earnings$266,744$222,078Fixed charges:
Interest expense$350,633$256,993Implicit interest in rents3,4353,708Total fixed charges$354,068$260,701Ratio of earnings to fixed charges*0.750.85  * Earnings were inadequate to cover total fixed charges by $87.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and $38.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.    74
| DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES            |   | INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES         |   | STATE/JURISDICTION OFINCORPORATION  |
|-------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                                |   |                               |   |                                     |
| CIB      MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.    |   |                               |   | Wisconsin      Corporation               |
| CIBM      Bank                      |   |                               |   | Illinois      Commercial Bank            |
|                                |   | Marine      Investment Corporation |   | Nevada      Subsidiary                   |
| CIB      Construction, LLC          |   |                               |   | Illinois      Limited Liability Company  |
|                                |   | Canron      Corporation (1)        |   | Michigan      Corporation                |
| CIB      Marine Capital Trust I (3) |   |                               |   | Delaware      Business Trust             |
| CIB      Statutory Trust III (3)    |   |                               |   | Connecticut      Statutory Trust         |
| CIB      Statutory Trust IV (3)     |   |                               |   | Connecticut      Statutory Trust         |
| CIB      Statutory Trust V (3)      |   |                               |   | Delaware      Business Trust             |
| CIB      Marine Capital, LLC(2)     |   |                               |   | Wisconsin      Limited Liability Company |

----

| (1) | CIB      Construction owns 84% of the outstanding stock of Canron which filed for      dissolution in December 2006. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | During      2003, CIB Marine ceased to offer new loans through CIB Marine Capital and      began winding down its affairs, including the sale and collection of      outstanding loans. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3) | Inactive      subsidiaries. |
|-----|-----------------------------|

----
#### PERRY PUBLICATIONS, INC., Appellant, v. BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-697.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 7, 1971.

Harrison K. Chauncey, Jr., of Alley, Maass, Rogers, Lindsay & Chauncey, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ronald Sales and John T. Christiansen, Law Offices of Ronald Sales, Palm Beach, for appellee.

McDonald, PARKER LEE, Associate Judge.

Perry Publications, Inc., (hereafter referred to as Perry) appeals from a judgment entered against it in favor of Bankers Life and Casualty Company (hereafter referred to as Bankers).

The case was tried on stipulated facts. Those facts reveal that in consideration of the conveyance of real property by Bankers to Perry, Perry granted Bankers advertising credit of the value of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) to be used in papers owned by Perry. This credit was to be used up or exhausted during a period of thirty-six months. About five months before the expiration of the credit time, and at a time when a substantial portion of the credit had not been used, Bankers requested from Perry an extension of one year from the original expiration date within which to use the credit. Perry agreed in writing to this extension. It was stipulated that Bankers had the ability to consume or use the credit to achieve the benefit of its bargain within the allotted time, but upon receiving the extension of time, did not do so.

Thereafter, Perry sold its newspapers, thereby placing itself in a position where it could not complete the contract of affording advertising to Bankers. Bankers filed this suit to recover the value of the unused portion of the advertising. The trial judge entered judgment in favor of Bankers to that extent.

*605The theory of the Bankers’ case is that of promissory estoppel. This doctrine has not been successfully utilized in Florida thus far in any reported cases, but reference is made to it in two cases (South Inv. Corp. v. Norton (Fla.1952) 57 So.2d 1 and Southeastern Sales & Service Co. v. T. T. Watson, Inc. (Fla.App.1965) 172 So.2d 239). In the latter, the Court stated the “doctrine of ‘promissory estoppel’ broadly stated is that a promise, which the promi-sor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance of a substantial character on the part of promisee and which does produce such action or forbearance is binding if an injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise.”

The facts of this case fall within that definition and the doctrine was properly utilized in this instance.

The Judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and REED, J., concur.
#### Arsenio GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Hon. Murray GOODMAN, one of the Judges of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida and the State of Florida, Respondents.

No. 42945.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 26, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 266 So.2d 706.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1995
<CASH>                                         188
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9472
<ALLOWANCES>                                   242
<INVENTORY>                                    12442
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21884
<PP&E>                                         40883
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 64936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14601
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       76
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10887)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   64936
<SALES>                                        51760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               51760
<CGS>                                          45342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  45342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1140)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .34
        


</TABLE>
Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee (TTAC) 

Public Meeting

June 16, 2021

1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ET

via teleconference Call- in Number: 1 888 455-7136 or 

1 773 799 3680

Participant Code 4200152

Conference Number 1970369

 Agenda

Designated Federal Officer Krishna Vallabhaneni

Chairperson Lacey Horn

Call to Order

Roll Call by Chairperson Horn

Tribal Opening

Welcoming Remarks from Internal Revenue Service 

Commissioner Charles Rettig

Approval of Minutes from March 17, 2021 Meeting

TTAC Committee Updates

Subcommittee Updates

• General Welfare Exclusion Act 

• Dual Taxation

• Tribal Pensions 

Public Comments

Other Items 

Closing Business

Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-124-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

December 16, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 9, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle), P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas 77251-1642, filed in 
Docket No, CP98-124-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to construct, own and operate a 
new delivery point to be located in Pittsboro, Hendriks County Indiana, 
under Panhandle's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-83-000, 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Specifically Panhandle proposes to install two 8-inch hot taps and 
check valves on Panhandle's mainline facilities, approximately 1,200 
feet of 8-inch connecting pipe, and install electronic gas measurement 
equipment on the proposed metering facilities. Panhandle states that 
the proposed interconnection will be utilized to provide transportation 
service to Indiana Gas Company (Indiana Gas) for redelivery to 
Qualitech Corporation, a steel plant near Pittsboro, Indiana. Panhandle 
states that Indiana Gas will also construct facilities to accommodate 
receipt of the gas from Panhandle. The estimated cost of the proposed 
facilities is approximately $85,000, which Panhandle states will be 
reimbursed by Indiana Gas. Panhandle states that the new 
interconnection will be designed to deliver up to 36,000 Dt/d of 
natural gas.
    Panhandle states that the construction of the proposed facilities 
will have no effect on its peak day and annual delivery requirement, 
and that Panhandle has sufficient capacity to accomplish deliveries 
without detriment or disadvantage to its other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33272 Filed 12-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Sanitized – Attachment 017 

Page 1 of 1
#### Johnny Wayne EVANS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-29.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 10, 1972.

Pollack, Yocom & Fath, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was tried, non-jury, and found guilty of robbery and assault with intent to commit murder.

Reversal is sought on the ground that the court erred in admitting the in-court identification of the defendant by one of the victims.

After careful consideration of the record and briefs we have concluded that the point is without merit and that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.
<PAGE> 32

                                                                  Exhibit 12


        AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
          Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (Unaudited)



                                                        Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,
                                                        2004          2003
                                                      (dollars in thousands)

Earnings:
  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                             $503,737      $433,539
  Interest expense                                     445,197       406,452
  Implicit interest in rents                            13,922        13,804

Total earnings                                        $962,856      $853,795


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                    $445,197      $406,452
  Implicit interest in rents                            13,922        13,804

Total fixed charges                                   $459,119      $420,256


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        2.10          2.03
#### Lester V. QUINE, Jr. v. IDEAL CEMENT COMPANY.

No. 61180.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Lester V. Quine, Jr. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of E. Baton Rouge. 351 So.2d 1303.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33085]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Leadership Initiatives Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Leadership Initiatives Panel, Folk & Traditional Arts 
Infrastructure Section, to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held on January 7-8, 1998. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 
p.m. on January 7, and from 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on January 8 in 
Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, D.C., 20506. A portion of this meeting, from 9:00 to 10:00 
a.m. on January 8, will be open to the public for a policy discussion.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 
on January 7, and from 10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on January 8, are for 
the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation 
on applications for financial assistance under the National Foundation 
on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including 
information given in confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of March 31, 1997, 
these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c) 
(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: December 15, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-33085 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M