alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,712
<INVENTORY>                                     47,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,355
<PP&E>                                         147,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,083
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,460
<SALES>                                         62,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,013
<CGS>                                           39,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    971
<INCOME-TAX>                                       359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                612
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       612
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000
18 12 06 00 06/02 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5326 September Term, 2023

1:22-cv-02375-UNA

Filed On: November 14, 2023

Harry Nie,

Appellant

v.

Rebecca Beach Smith, Judge, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Henderson, Pillard, and Pan, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed October 24,

2022 be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that it lacks jurisdiction to

review the decisions of other federal courts. Smalls v. United States, 471 F.3d 186,

192 (D.C. Cir. 2006). Additionally, appellant is not entitled to the injunctive relief he

seeks, as appellate and post-judgment review of his conviction provided an adequate

remedy at law for his claims. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-44 (1971) (equitable

relief not available if an adequate remedy at law exists); Pugh v. Ashcroft, 116 Fed.

App’x 287, 288 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (holding that “equitable relief is available only in the

absence of adequate remedies at law” and the appellant had “an adequate legal

remedy for any judicial error or misconduct in the form of post-judgment proceedings in

the appropriate courts”) (internal quotation marks omitted). 
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5326 September Term, 2023

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67617-67618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Business-Cooperative Service


Maximum Dollar Amount on Loan and Grant Awards Under the Rural 
Economic Development Loan and Grant Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 1998

AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS) hereby announces 
the maximum dollar amount on loan and grant awards under the Rural 
Economic Development Loan and Grant program for FY 1998. The maximum 
dollar award on zero-interest loans for FY 1998 is $750,000. The 
maximum dollar award on grants for FY 1998 is $330,000. The maximum 
loan and grant awards stated in this notice are effective for loans and 
grants made during the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1997, and 
ending September 30, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Wing, Loan Specialist, Rural

[[Page 67618]]

Business-Cooperative Service, USDA, STOP 1521, Room 5412, 1400 
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250, Telephone: (202) 720-
9558. FAX: 202-720-6561. E-mail: PW<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85ecebe2c5f7f0f6abf0f6e1e4abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f79e9990b7858284d982849396d9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The maximum loan and grant awards are 
calculated as 3.0 percent of the projected program level for zero-
interest loans and grants during the fiscal year. The projected program 
level for zero-interest loans during FY 1998 is $25,000,000, and the 
projected program level for grants is $11,000,000. Applying the 
specified 3.0 percent to these program levels results in the maximum 
loan award of $750,000 and the maximum grant award of $330,000.

    Dated: December 19, 1997.
Dayton J. Watkins,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. 97-33696 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Manuel BUERGO, Appellant, v. J & M OF HIALEAH, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-322.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 13, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32   Certifications   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, of American General Finance Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/Frederick W. GeissingerFrederick W. GeissingerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:May 9, 2008   45
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada 
Test Site

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EMSSAB), Nevada Test Site.

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, January 7, 1998: 5:30 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Support Facility, Great 
Basin Room, 232 Energy Way, North Las Vegas, Nevada.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Rohrer, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Environmental Management, P.O. Box 98518, Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89193-8513, Telephone: 702-295-0197. Please contact Kevin Rohrer 
to confirm the meeting location. It may be subject to change.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to DOE and its 
regulators in the areas of environmental restoration, waste management, 
and related activities.

January Agenda

5:30 p.m.--Call to Order
5:40 p.m.--Presentations
7:00 p.m.--Public Comment/Questions
7:30 p.m.--Break
7:45 p.m.--Review Action Items
8:00 p.m.--Approve Meeting Minutes
8:10 p.m.--Committee Reports
8:45 p.m.--Public Comment
9:00 p.m.--Adjourn

    Copies of the final agenda will be available at the meeting.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Kevin Rohrer, at the telephone number 
listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior to the meeting and 
reasonable provision will be made to include the presentation in the 
agenda. The Designated Federal Official is empowered to conduct the 
meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of 
business.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Kevin Rohrer at 
the address listed above.

    Issued at Washington, DC on December 5, 1997.
Althea T. Vanzego,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-32436 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-61-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 25, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become 
effective January 1, 1998:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 5200

    Koch states that the above referenced tariff sheet is being filed 
to revise its imbalance trading form to be consistent with Section 
20.1(A)(1) of the General Terms and Conditions. Koch states that this 
Section of its tariff provides that each month's imbalance will be 
traded with imbalances incurred for the same month.
    Koch also states that it has served copies of the instant filing 
upon each affected customer, state commissions, and other interested 
parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided by Section 154.210 of the Commission's rules and regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31991 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Harold SALMON, Appellant, v. ROBER BROS., INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 76-2284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1977.

*1106William A. Kledzik, of James P. Pánico & Associates, P. A., Maitland, for appellant.

Richard A. Leigh, of Leonhardt, Trickel, Leigh & Gibson, Orlando, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellant, as Vendee, sued appellee, as Vendor, for breach of a contract to convey realty. Appellant sought to recover the $19,000 deposit which he had delivered to appellee pursuant to the contract. Upon appellee’s motion the trial court entered a summary judgment in its favor.

The breach of contract with which appellee was charged was failure to furnish an abstract of title as required by the contract. However, on motion for summary judgment appellee demonstrated by depositions in the record that appellee had furnished the required abstract of title and that, therefore, there was no genuine issue of material fact involved.

Additionally, appellant contends that the contract provision which allowed appellee to retain the deposit of $19,000 in the event appellant defaulted under the terms of the contract was a forfeiture and thus was unenforceable. We reject this contention upon authority of *Hutchison v. Tompkins,*259 So.2d 129 (Fla.1972) and *Bruce Builders, Inc. v. Goodwin,*317 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

For the foregoing reasons the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.
ST14~TE oF N E\/ADA Brian Sandoval, Governor rvie’,, Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Leo M. Drozdoff. RE., Director

NIVADA DtVlSIONo~

ENVIRON~1ENTAL PROT[CTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ColleenCnpps,Ph.D.,Admjnjstrator

p~vtecting the future fur genenmons

November 20, 2014

Jared Blumenfeld

Regional Administrator

U.S. EPA Region IX, ORA-1

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

RE: Nevada SIP Revisions, Clark County Air Quality Regulations: Amendments to

Sections 26 and 92; Repeal of Sections 29,30,52 and 60

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld:

On behalf of Governor Sandoval, as his appointed designee, this letter transmits to you two hard

copies and five exact duplicates of the hard copies in electronic form ofrevisions to the Clark

County portion of the Nevada applicable state implementation plan (SIP). The revisions regard

Clark County Air Quality Regulations (AQR) and include amendments to sections 26 and 92,

and removal of sections 29, 30, 52 and 60. These regulations are available on the Clark County

Department ofAir Quality (DAQ) web site at

http://www.clarkcountYnv.gov/depts/AirOua1ity/Pa~es/Ru1esCurrentRu1esandRegu1atjonsaspx

The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) requests approval of the enclosed

revisions into the Nevada applicable SIP.

The NDEP has reviewed this submittal and found it complete. Evidence of the adoption or

repeal of each AQR section, appropriate public notice and the participation process is included in

this package. If you should have any questions about this submittal or require additional

clarification, you may contact Russell Roberts of the Clark County Department ofAir Quality at

(702) 455-1611.

Sincerely,

€~‘Colleen Cripps, Ph.D.

Administrator

Enclosures

901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 4001 • Carson City, Nevada 89701 • p: 775.687.4670 • f: 775.687.5856 • ndep.nv.gov

Printed on recycledpaper
Jared Blumenfeid, Regional Administrator

November 19, 2014

Page 2

cc w/o enclosures:

Cory Hunt, Policy Analyst, Office ofthe Governor

Amy Zimpfer, Associate Director (AIR-i), EPA Region IX, Air Division

Gerardo Rios, Chief, Permits Office (AIR-3), EPA Region IX, Air Division

Laura Yannayon, Permits Office (AIR-3), EPA Region IX, Air Division

Rory Mays, Planning Office (AIR-2), EPA Region IX, Air Division

cc wlo enclosures:

Leo Drozdoff, Director,DCNR

Jasmine Mehta, Chief, Bureau ofAir Quality Planning, NDEP

Certified Mail No. 9171 9690 0935 0012 2387 95
# Rupprecht Law P. A. 3 24 Datura Street , Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 P: (561) 222 - 6979 | E : jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com August 10 , 2015 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12 - 140, Washington, DC 20590 RE: Receipt of confidentially submitted documents for Aerialpixels, LLC Dear Sir or Madam: Aerialpixels, LLC ( Docket ID: FAA - 2015 - 3174 ) confidentially submitted to 333exemptions@faa.gov the follow documents: 1 ) Motion Picture & Television Operations Manual 2 ) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Phantom 2 3 ) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Phantom 3 4 ) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Inspire 1 5 ) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI S 900 6 ) Aircraft Flight Manual - Cinestar 6 7 ) Aircraft Flight Manual - Cinestar 8 8 ) Aircraft Flight Manual - AerialPixels FX 8 Pro Elite 9) Aircraft Flight Manual - Mini 250 A receipt was obtained on Tue, August 0 4 , 2015 . If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561)222 - 6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com Sincerely yours,

_____________________ Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq .
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Cases Filed; Week of December 30, 1996 Through January 
3, 1997

    During the Week of December 30, 1996 through January 3, 1997, the 
appeals, applications, petitions or other requests listed in this 
Notice were filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the 
Department of Energy.
    Any person who will be aggrieved by the DOE action sought in any of 
these cases may file written comments on the application within ten 
days of publication of this Notice or the date of receipt of actual 
notice, whichever occurs first. All such comments shall be filed with 
the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy, Washington, 
DC. 20585-0107.

    Dated: February 3, 1997.
George B. Breznay,
Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

                          List of Cases Received by the Office of Hearings and Appeals                          
                               [Week of December 30, 1996 through January 3, 1997]                              
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Name and Location of                                                                 
          Date                   applicant                Case No.                  Type of submission          
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/2/97.................  Eugene Maples,            VFA-0258               Appeal of an Information Request      
                          Alexandria, Virginia.                            Denial. If Granted: The November 25, 
                                                                           1996, Freedom of Information Request 
                                                                           Denial issued by the Assistant       
                                                                           Inspector General for Investigations 
                                                                           would be rescinded, and Eugene Maples
                                                                           would receive access to certain      
                                                                           portions of an investigative report  
                                                                           on the fraudulent use of oil         
                                                                           overcharge funds in South Carolina.  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 97-3312 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Document

Exhibit 10.1


Summary of Directors’ Compensation
The Compensation Committee of NewMarket Corporation (the “Company”) approved directors' compensation, which is effective October 1, 2021. The Company pays the following quarterly fees for non-employee committee membership: 
 
						
	Audit Committee Member	$	1,250 	
	Audit Committee Chairman	5,000 	
	Compensation Committee Chairman	3,750 	
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman	2,500 	


The Company pays each of its non-employee directors a quarterly fee of $23,750. In addition to this amount, the Company pays the Lead Director a quarterly fee of $6,250. The Company does not pay employee members of the Board of Directors separately for their service on the Board of Directors or its committees. 
Any director who was elected to the Board of Directors on or before February 23, 1995 and who retires from the Board of Directors will receive $12,000 per year for life after age 60. The $12,000 is payable in quarterly installments. The retirement payments to former directors may be discontinued under certain circumstances. 
Under the 2014 Incentive Compensation and Stock Plan (the “Plan”), each non-employee director is awarded on each July 1 that number of whole shares of the Company’s common stock that, when multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the immediately preceding business day equals as nearly as possible but does not exceed $90,000. The shares of the Company’s common stock awarded under the Plan are nonforfeitable and the recipient directors immediately and fully vest in shares of the Company’s common stock issued under the Plan. Subject only to such limitations on transfer as may be specified by applicable securities laws, directors may sell their shares under the Plan at any time.