RECEIVED 

FEB 0 6 2017 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS HEARING DOCKET 

WASHINGTON, DC 

***************************** 

In the Matter of: * 

Airpac Enterprises, Inc. * Docket No. FAA-2016-8494 

* Case No. 2016WP910042 

* ALJ-RAWALD 

* 

***************************** 

TO: Honorable Douglas M. Rawald and Respondent 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR DECISION 

COMES NOW, Complainant, by counsel, pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.218(±)(5), files this 

Motion for Decision. This motion is made on the basis that the pleadings, and matters that the 

administrative law judge has officially noticed show that there is no genuine issue of material 

fact and that the Complainant is entitled to a decision as a matter of law. 

FNPCP and Respondent's written request for a hearing to the Hearing Docket Clerk. 

On August 12, 2016, Complainant issued a Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty 

("FNPCP") against Respondent, and advised Respondent to either submit the proposed civil 

penalty or mail or personally deliver a written request for a hearing to the Hearing Docket Clerk. 

On August 26, 2016, by electronic transmission to the undersigned, Respondent copied 

its written request for a hearing. In response, on August 26, 2016, by electronic transmission, the 

undersigned acknowledged receipt of the appeal and noticed Respondent that the undersigned 

would be filing the complaint. See attached, Exhibit A, Respondent's August 26, 2016, 

electronic transmission with attached letter requesting a hearing and subsequent exchange of 

electronic transmissions between Complainant and Respondent. 
August 30, 2016, complaint (Respondent received on September 1, 2016). 

On August 30, 2016, pursuant to 14 C.P.R. 13.208, Complainant filed, by certified mail, 

return-receipt requested, the complaint. Counsel for Respondent received the complaint on 

September I, 2016. (Respondent received the complaint on September 2, 2016.) See attached 

Exhibit B, the complaint and referenced certified mail receipts and corresponding return-receipts. 

Respondent advised of the need to file an answer within 30 days of service of the 

complaint. 

Although, within the complaint, Complainant did not advise Respondent of the need to 

file an answer within 3 0 days of service of the complaint, Complainant advised Respondent by 

electronic transmissions on September 27, 2016, and again, on September 29, 2016, of the need 

to file an answer within 30 days of service of the complaint in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 

13.209(a). See attached Exhibit C, the September 27, 2016, email, and see attached Exhibit D, 

the September 29, 2016, email with its referenced attachments (Hearing Docket Clerk letter of 

September 8, 2016, and 14 C.F.R. 13.209). 

Respondent failed to file an answer in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 13.209. 

Respondent, on October 7, 2016, by electronic transmission to the undersigned, attached 

its answer to the complaint. See attached Exhibit E, the October 7, 2016, email with attached 

answer to the complaint. 

Respondent failed to file an answer in accordance with 14 C.P.R. § 13.209. Respondent's 

answer is a "General Denial" and was filed after the required deadline for filing an answer. Even 

if timely, Respondent's "General Denial" on October 7, 2016, does not qualifY as an answer. "A 

general denial of the complaint is deemed a failure to file an answer." 14 C.P.R.§ 13.209(c). 

2 
Show Cause Order. 

On October 17,2016, your Honor issued an Order to Show Cause and Provide Answer 

("Show Cause Order"). The Show Cause Order required the Respondent, by November 16, 

2016, to file a written statement explaining the cause of Respondent's failure to timely file its 

written answer to the complaint (or a written motion to dismiss the complaint). Further, the 

Show Cause Order advised Respondent that if it fails to file a written statement explaining the 

cause of its failure to timely file its written answer to the complaint, your Honor may issue a 

subsequent order finding the Respondent has "constructively withdrawn the request for hearing 

and, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 13.215, dismiss the case with prejudice." Order at 3. To date, 

Respondent has failed to respond to the Show Cause Order. 

Order Setting Prehearing Conference for January 5, 2017. 

On November 22, 2016, your Honor issued an Order Setting Prehearing Conference. The 

order required the parties to appear by telephone for a prehearing conference with your Honor on 

January 5, 2017, at 2:00pm Eastern time. The order advised Respondent that if Respondent fails 

to attend the prehearing conference, your Honor may issue a subsequent order fmding the 

Respondent has constructively withdrawn its request for a hearing and, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 

13.215, dismiss the case with prejudice. 

January 5, 2017 Prehearing Conference. 

On January 5, 2017, your Honor held the prehearing conference. The undersigned 

cotmsel for Complainant attended the conference telephonically. Counsel for the Respondent 

failed to appear and therefore Respondent waived the right to participate in the discussion of 

matters, including Respondent's answer and schedule for motion for decision. 

3 
Argument. 

Respondent failed to file a written answer to the complaint (or a written motion to 

dismiss the complaint) within 30 days of service of the complaint. 14 C.P.R.§ 13.209(a). 

Failure to file a written answer within 30 days without good cause shall be deemed an admission 

of the truth of each allegation contained in the complaint. 14 C.P.R.§ l3.209(f). Thus, under 

the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.201-13.235, a showing of 

good cause is mandatory. Without it, failure to file an answer by the deadline may not be 

excused. Atlantic World Airways, FAA Order No. 1995-28 (Dec. 19, 1995). 

In its answer Respondent provided no reasons for its delay in filing it. Respondent failed 

to respond to the Show Cause Order, which ordered Respondent to file a written statement 

explaining the cause of its failure to file its written answer. Respondent filed a late answer and 

failed to present good cause for the delay. 

Even if Respondent's answer was timely, Respondent failed to specifically admit or deny 

each numbered paragraph of the complaint. 14 C.F.R. § 13.209(e). Respondent's "General 

Denial" does not qualifY as an answer. A general denial of the complaint is deemed a failure to 

file an answer. 14 C.F.R. § 13.209(e). 

The Show Cause Order advised Respondent that if it fails to file a written statement 

explaining the cause of its failure to timely file its written answer to the complaint, your Honor 

may issue a subsequent order finding the Respondent has constructively withdrawn the request 

for hearing and, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 13.215, dismiss the case with prejudice. Counsel for the 

Respondent failed to file a written statement explaining the cause of its failure to timely file its 

written answer to the complaint. 

4 
The Order Setting Prehearing Conference advised Respondent that if Respondent fails to 

attend the prehearing conference, your Honor may issue a subsequent order fmding the 

Respondent has constructively withdrawn its request for a hearing and, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 

13.215, dismiss the case with prejudice. Counsel for the Respondent failed to appear at the 

Prehearing Conference. 

Accordingly, Respondent is in default in this case. Respondent's request for hearing must 

be dismissed and an order assessing civil penalty in this matter must be issued. 

WHEREFORE, the Complainant respectfully requests this Court grant Complainant's 

Motion for Decision. There is no genuine issue of material fact and Complainant is entitled to a 

decision as a matter of law. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Naomi Tsuda 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

For Enforcement 

By: 

Lis 

~r{~ Toscano, Attorney 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

email: Lis a.M. Toscanolalfaa.gov 

Telephone: (310) 725-7100 (main) 

(310) 725-7110 (direct) 

(31 0) 725-6816 (fax) 

5 
DOCKETNO. FAA-2016-8494 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this date I have sent by United States First-Class mail, the 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR DECISION, with Exhibits A- E, addressed as follows: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl 000 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Courtesy Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

Reza Sina, Esq. 

Courtesy email: 

Counsel for Airpac Enterprises, Inc. 

1 07 West Valencia Avenue 

Burbank, CA 91502 

reza@sinalawgroup.com 

Dated: January 31, 2017 

/"~! J ~ / ... . 

~'YU~-.&+~ Antonia Garcia, Program Analyst 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

Lawndale, CA 

6 
Toscano, lisa M (FAA) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Dear Ms. Toscano: 

Reza Sina <reza@sinalawgroup.com> 

Friday, August 26, 2016 1:26PM 

Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

L to FAA re Airpac ·Request for Hearing.pdf 

Please see attached request for hearing. 

Thank you and have a wonderful weekend. 

Reza 

Reza Sina 

S!NA LAW GROUP 

107 West Valencia Ave. 

Burbank, CA 91502 

001untow11 Office 

888 West 6th Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Tel: (310) 957-2057 

reza'(i:sinala '-Vgro up .corn 

I.Y\Y\Y .sinala vvgrou p .con1 

This transmittal may contain privileged and confidential information, and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed 

above. If you are neither the intended recipient(s)_ nor a person responsible for the delivery of his transmittal to the 

intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited. If you have 

received this transmittal in error, please notify Sina Law Group immediately. 

Exhibit A 

1 
SINA LAW GROUP 

107WEST VALENCIA AVENUE 

BURBANK, CALIFORNIA 91502 

Telephone: 310.957.2057 

E-mail: rp;t~l~nsindldwc,wur.rnm 

August 26, 2016 

Via US Mail and Email 

fLisa.M. Toscano@faa.gov) 

LisaM. Toscano, AWP-7.13 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

POBox 92007 

L.A., CA 90009-2007 

Re: REQUEST FOR HEARING 

Via US Mail 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Bldg- Suite 2W1 000 

Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

Dear Ms. Toscano: 

Please allow me to introduce myself as counsel for Airpac Enterprises, Inc. 

Please direct all future inquiries regarding this matter to my firm. 

We are requesting a hearing on the civil penalty accessed. This letter shall 

constitute our request for hearing. 

Please call me if you have any questions. I look forward to working with 

you to resolve this matter. 

Exhibit A 

2 
Toscano, lisa M (FAA) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Lisa 1';;_ Tosca;-i,J 

i-J.-\;'\ Enfor·cenl2i1l ,:,ttorne'-1 

;310) 725-71L) 

Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Friday, August 26, 2016 2:33 PM 

'Reza Sina' 

RE: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

From: Reza Sina [mailto:reza©sina!awqroiJQ.com] 

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 2:31 PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Re: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

Thanks, Lisa. 

I will be out of town for the next 2 weeks and would like to speak with you about the matter when I get back. 

Reza 

Sent from my iPhone 

:\lr Sina 

;-: 

;3101 "7.2S·'il_iC) 

From: Reza Sin a [mailto: rezarrusinalaworoup.cqm] 

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 1:26PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

Dear Ms. Toscano: 

Please see attached request for hearing. 

Thank you and have a wonderhrl weekend. 

Exhibit A 

3 
Reza 

Reza Sina 

SINA LAW GROUP 

107 West Valencia Ave. 

Burbank, CA 91502 

Oowlltown Office 

888 West 6th Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Tel: (310) 957-2057 

reza;6Jsi nala. vvgrou p .(()l1l 

\\"\V\V .sinalavvgrott p.con1 

This transmittal may contain privileged and confidential information, and is intended only for the 

reclpient(s) listed above. If you are neither the intended recipient(s), nor a person responsible for the 

delivery of his transmittal to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any distribution or 

copying of this transmittal is prohibited. If you have received this trnnsmittal in error, please notify Sina 

Law Group immediately. 

2 Exhibit A 

4 
U.S. DE\portrnent 

o.i Transpo1otion 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL. RETUR.t'\1-RECEIPT REQUESTED 

August 30,2016 

Hearing Docket 

federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington. DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

RE: ln the matter of Airpac Enterprises, Inc. 

Enforcement Otvision 

Western Team. Mail Stop AWP-7.13 

PO Box 92007 

LA, CA 90009-2007 

FAA Docket No. CP-Not Assigned: Case No. 20 16WP91 0042 

Enclosed are the original and one copy of the complaint in the above-referenced case. The 

Complainant requests that the hearing be held in Los Angeles, California and expects that the 

hearing in this case will last one (I) day. All cmTespondence to the Complainant in this matter 

should be directed to Lisa M. Toscano at: 

Enforcement Division. Western Team. A WP-7. 13 

PO Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

email: Lisa.M.Toscanolalfaa.gov 

Telephone: (31 0) 725-7100 (main) 

(3 10) 7:25-7110 (direct) 

(31 0) 725-6816 (fax) 

Respectfully, 

Lis~Jtr:J:~- Enforcement Division. Western Team 

Enclosure 

cc: Reza Sina. Esq .. Sin a Law Group 

AAM-850 

Exhibit B 

1 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDER>\L AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In the matter of: 

AIRP AC ENTERPRISES, INC. 

JUDGE NOT ASSIGNED 

FAA Docket No. CP- Not Assigned 

Case No. 2016WP910042 

COMPLAINT 

The Complainant hereby files its Complaint. pursuant to Rule 208 of the Rules of 

Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions (14 C.F.R. § 13.208), and states as follows: 

I. 

Respondent Airpac Enterprises, Inc., was advised through a Notice of Proposed Civil 

Penalty dated June 14, 2016 and by a Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty dated August 12. 

2016, that the FAA proposed to assess a civil penalty in the amount of$10,075.00. By a letter 

dated August 26, 2016, Respondent requested a hearing. The Enforcement Division, 

Western Team received Respondent's written request for a hearing on August 26. 2016. 

II. 

1. Aiq)ac Enterj)rises, Inc. (Airpac) is now. and at all times relevant herein was. the 

holder of Air Agency Certificate No. Xl3R 131 Y. authorized to operate as an 

approved Repair Station under 14 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) part 145 of 

rbe Federal Aviation Regulations. 

') At all times rclev·ant herein, Airpac held appropriate Operations Specifications 

(OpSpecs) certifying it would complv with the requirements of 14 Code of 

Exhibit B 

2 
2 

Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) part 120 ancl49 C.F.R part 40 for its drug and 

alcohol testing program. 

3. Random selections were made fi·om Airpac·s Department of Transportation 

(DOT) random drug and alcohol testing pools on the first clay of every month for 

the year 2015. 

4. Airpac did not add Lisa Rajic to Airpac·s DOT random drug and alcohol testing 

pool until January 2016. 

5. Ms. Rajic performed safety-sensitive work on behalf of Airpac on October 5, 

2015, by signing on block 14b. of an 8130-3, Airworthiness Release Certificate, 

related to work order# W0214562, for Horizon Air (Certificate No. QXEA002A) 

authorizing a Return to Service of Seat Assembly SN 48-1407. 

Ill. 

1. By reason of the foregoing, Respondent violated: 

a. 14 C.F.R. ~ 120.105. which states: Each employ~e. including any assistant. 

helper. or individual in a training status. who performs a safety-sensitive 

function listed in this section directly or by contract (including by subcontract 

at am tier) for an em plover as de tined in this subpart must be subject to drug 

Exhibit B 

3 
testing under a drug testing program implemented in accordance with this 

subpart. This includes fi.lll-time, part-time, temporary. and intermittent 

employees regardless ofthe degree of supervision: and 

b. 14 C.F.R. § 120.215(a), which states: Each employee. including any 

assistant. helper, or individual in a training status, who performs a safetysensitive function listed in this section directly or by contract (including by 

subcontract at any tier) for an employer as defined in this subpart must be 

subject to alcohol testing under an alcohol testing program implemented in 

accordance with this subpart. This includes fi_rll-time. part-time. temporary, 

and intermittent employees regardless of the degree of supervision. 

2. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 46301(a)(5)(A), Respondent is subject to a civil penalty 

not to exceed $11,000.00 for each violation of the Federal Aviation Regulations. 

3. Under the facts and circumstances of this case and in accordance with the 

Administrator's Sanction Guidance in FAA Order 2150.38, Appendix B, a civil penalty of 

$10.075.00 is appropriate for the violation(s) in this case. 

Exhibit 8 

4 

·' 
4 

WHEREFORE. the Complainant respectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge 

enter an order that Respondent be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $10.07 5 .00. 

Respectfully submitted. 

Naomi Tsuda 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By dvH.. ffl':J~ Lisa M. Toscano 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

PO Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

email: Lisa.!vl.Toscano@faa.E:ov 

Telephone: (310) 725-7100 (main) 

(310) 725-7110 (direct) 

(31 0) 725-6816 (fax) 

Date: August 30,2016 

Exhibit B 

5 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this date, I have sent by U.S. Cer1ilied Mail- return receipt 

requested. a copy of the foregoing complaint in the matter of Airpac Enterprises. Inc., FAA 

Docket No. CP- not assigned, Case No. 2016WP910042 to: 

Lisa Rajic. President/CEO 

Airpac Enterprises, Inc. 

12611 Encinitas Ave 

Sylmar, CA 91342 

And 

Reza S ina, Esq. 

Sina Law Group 

107 West Valencia Avenue 

Burbank, CA 91502 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date, I have sent by U.S. Certified Mail- return 

receipt requested. the original and one copy of the foregoing document to: 

Hearing Docket 

Pederal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue. SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

/. 

/ ! < 1/t' Lcj. jl..f .. - I ·· .. 

! .· .~>11 j'?t.(/ v ./iL.p:.,;..c..,; 

Antonia Garcia. Paralegal 

Enforcement Division. Western Team 

Lawndale. C A 90261 

Date: August 30. 2016 

Exhibit B 

6 

5 
Com-plete Items 1, 2, and complete 

item 4 if Restricted Delivery ls desired. 

!Ill Print your name and address on the reverse 

so that we can return the card to you. 

Iii Attach this card to the back of the mai!piece, 

or on the front if space permits. 

D. Is delivery address different from item 

i. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 

Lisa Rajie/l'resident/CEO 

Airpac Em€rprises, Inc. 

12611 Encinitas Ave 

Sylmar, CA 91342 

2. Article Number 

(Transferfrom service tal 

PS Form 3811, July 2013 

7015 0920 0001 5090 8993 

Domestic Return Receipt 

Po·>:HJf: ~ S 

;--··---i 

r-"1 CC>:11f1~Cl Fe:= ,! --------: 

~ ~~;;:~~~~::,~:~~ 1------"·-----1 ~ i 

:'; r""' P'tisa Rajic, President/CEO 

Ul :-sz.:-TrcA.irpac Enterprises, Inc. 

~ :.!o'lr~o:y,r;c·,J·2611 Encinitas Ave 

"- ,""05."$ylmar; CA 91342 i Ci';.'. SW!e, 

I 

Exhibit B 

7 

I _____ ] 

' i .... I 

I 
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION 

m Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also comrlete 

item 4 lf Restricted Delivery iS desired. 

l!ll Print your name and address on the reverse 

so that we can return the card to you. 

Iii Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 

or on the front if space permits. 

1. Article Addressed to: 

Reza Sina, Esq. 

s-ma Law Group 

11'l7 West Valencia Avenue 

Burbank, CA 91502 

·~-------! 

COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ) 

' ll 

I ' . 1 B.t?/fl-J of Dehver 

I I I I 

A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) 

I 

D Agent 

D Addresse• 

D. Is delivery address different from item 1? DYes 

If YES. enter delivery address belov,.: 0 ~Jo 

0 Registered 

0 Insured Mail 

0 Return Receipt !or Merchandis< 

0 C.O.D. 

Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 

2. Article Number (Copy from servt 

~~~~~~~~~-7_0_1_5~0920 0001 5090 9006 

PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 

Exhibit B 

8 
Toscano, Usa M (FAA) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:21 PM 

'Reza Sina' 

Subject: RE: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042; FDMS No. FAA-2016-8494 

!jjJ r-.-;. TosC2'l0 

310.' 715~7110 

•, 

From: Reza Sina [mai)to:reza@sinalawaroup.com] 

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 2:31 PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Re: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

Thanks, Lisa. 

I will be out oftown for the next 2 weeks and would like to speak with you about the matter when I get back. 

Reza 

Sent from my iPhone 

On Aug 26. 2016. at 1 :48 PM. <Li"\.1\ !.Toscano" Lu. ~c11> <L isc].l\1. lcbcano it Ln~lll:> wrote: 

From: Reza Sina [mailto:rezij@sinalaworouo.com] 

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 1:26 PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

Dear iVfs. Toscano: 

Please sec attached request for hearing. 

Thank you and hal'e a 1\0mkrful weekend. 

Exhibit C 

1 
Reza 

Reza Sina 

SINA LAW GROUP 

107 West Valencia Ave. 

Burbank, CA 91502 

DolPiltown Office 

888 West 6th Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Tel: (310) 957-2057 

reza·~_l:si11alJ. vv group .co n1 

\V\\'\V .si nala ~.-vgroup .con1 

This transmittal may contain privileged and confidential information, and is intended only for the 

recipient(s) listed above. If you are neither the intended recipicnt(s), nor a person responsible for the 

delivery of his transmittal to the i~tended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any distribution or 

copying of this transmittal is prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify Sina 

Law Group immediately. 

2 Exhibit C 

2 
Toscano, lisa M (FAA) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Thursday, September 29, 2016 3:00 PM 

'Reza Sina' 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

RE: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042; FDMS No. FAA-2016-8494 

scan_2016_09_29_17 _34_56_067.pdf; 14 CFR 13.209.pdf 

th~ i:F.12JCS cf 

lisa :\'!. TosC?.iD 

(310) 725-7110 

From: Reza Sina [mailto:reza(cilsinalawgroup.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 2.7, 2016 5:20 PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Re: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042; FDMS No. FAA-2016-8494 

Hi Lisa: 

I'm in trial in federal court in Downtown all week. Can I gel an additional 1 0 days? 

Reza 

Sent from my iPhone 

On Sep 27,2016. at3:21 PM. <Lisa.i'd. J'o:-~cano·(j-l~l~t.on\-> <Lisa.lvl.Tnscan(HI !~l<:l.!lO\"> wrote: 

:::,: \:0, 

'.- '-' r 

.. ~:~--~,_~.;-. ·--~, 

:I. 

From: Reza Sina [mailto:reza:il•sinalawqroup.com] 

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 2:31 PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Re: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 20 16WP910042 

Exhibit D 

1 
Thanks. Lisa. 

I will be out of town for the next 2 weeks and would like to speak with you about the matter 

when I get back. 

Reza 

Sent fi·om my iPhone 

On Aug 26, 2016. at 1 :48 PM. <Lisa.iVI.Toscanc1 ,; Lw. ~ov> <Lisa.~ I. ruscano•,/ LliL~ov> wrote: 

\I; Sin;J, 

From: Reza Sina [mailto:reza\a!sinalawgroup.com] 

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 1:26PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

Dear Ms. Toscano: 

Please see attached request for hearing. 

Thank you and have a wonderful weekend. 

Reza 

Reza Sina 

S!NA LAW GROUP 

107 West Valencia Ave. 

Burbank, CA 91502 

Oown/muJI Olji'ce 

888 West 6th Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Tel: (310) 957-2057 

rez;:-1 ·rtsi na L:-t \\'g:rou p .cu 111 

\ \'\ \'\ \' .S i !l<:l la \\'£l'()U p .Cl )111 

This transmiltdlmay contain privileged and confidential information, and is intended 

only for the recipient(s) listed above. If you arc neither the intended r('Cipient(s), nor a 

person responsible for the delivery of his transmittal to the intended recipient(s), you arc 

hereby notified thc1l any' distribution or copying of this transmittal is ~1rohibited. If _vou 

2 Exhibit 0 

2 
have received this transmittal in error, please notify Sina Law Group immedintely. 

J Exhibit D 

3 
Federal A•Jiation Administration 

Office of Adjudication 

11.1\S\1.\II 

l.i-:':1 \!. l'tl::-;Cilllll. E.-;q_ 

h .'Lk:·;!) :\\ i:Hi1111 .·\dministratinn 

t:n!lwccnh:nt J)i,·i:-;i\•1\. \\"cs!l'rn l'c<Ull. :\ \\'P- :.l::; 

P.U. !{,n 9:::0il-:-

!.zls .-\n_l2<.:k·s. C.-\ l)()OtJl)-:::uo: 

R.:1.a S ina. Lsq 

Sin:1 l_a,, (jr,_,up 

10-:' \\"est Vakncia .\\L'!ltl\.' 

Burbanl-.. C.-\ l) i ~U~ 

\\c il<t\C :tssign~.:d the abu\c-ro.:l"cr<..'I1Ccd l:cd~...·ral ]),li..:Lct \\anagcmcnt S~st~...·m (FD\-IS) numb'-'!" tu thi'=' 

nutter. Pk·~tSI...' includt..· this FD\lS number ~.)tlall ctltTcspnndl..'th.:c and t•n L'ach dtlCUtlh:nttll:!t ~ LHI !ilc \\·ith 

thl.' llc~ning 1\H.:L~..:t ir1 thi-; pru~.;L'cding.. \tll)lht..·r dlh.·h·t nllmhcr \\ill be ;Js:->ig.nl..'d. 

1·:\.\ ~.:i \ il pt..•nalt~ a...:tilm_-..; :Jt"t..' g1)\ l'I"I1t..'d h,;. the Rules ,,r Practic~...·. 1-l C.F.It <) 13.16 <nH.I I J.:::n l-!3.23:". 

l'ht..· l~uk:~ ,)r Pr:\ctJcc. ;1-.; ''ell <h nthLT thcful inl"mlllaliun ~th1ut L'i\ il pt..·twlt:· pr,l<..:t..'i...'dillgs and inlk.\cs c,r 

dc-:i-;i\llb issllt..'d b; the .'\dmini.~tratt11'. m~t~ bt..' flntnd at: 

hup:_· \\ \\ \\ ._Lt:t.gu\ ·~Jlh 1l!l '1!li...:c-_l.•t:gJl_','_<Ld_q~l-~_lflCI)_'.IIft....:t..'_-,__<]_g_,_;j1t_l l_:i\lj ud i<..::tli!il1 ':tg_~_:l il!J._s;_j_~i)_pt;.tl<i_l_t) 

!k <llh i:-it..'d that dlxlltllt..'lll:i riled\\ ith !hi.'! karin~ Dt)t..'hct \\ill he :1Y:1ilabk puhlic!: thr,lll~h th.__· !d\,1\\ in~ 

\\L'b->itc· i)_llp: \\_\\_\~J.:_~gltl<tL[0_1l_-;_g,)~ I!" )Lili lllc a ducutnl..'llt (\_ rH:tinin~ inl.lll"l11i\li(1Jl th:11 •dJt'luld tlt'l ht..· 

nwdc publici) :1\·ail:thk. :uu ;-;l1l1\Jld lik <1 rlltllion undL'r 1-·l C.F.R. ~ 13.2~(1, 

'-;h;!ric_:,__- .ld·fl-r.-,1111 

I k::ri:12! [) ... ,.:Ll'l C'k·rL_ \Cr!.·--tt 

Exhibit D 

4 
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

dg('I\C,\' ,lll<llll<'\ j;,',\l<'rl il llUiiC<" UJ jll'll 

rm<,Pd ci\'il P''li.dt\· 111 tlw n''>jliJIHh•nl 

(II .-\11 ;gfitlilli'-11'<11i\<' II\\ Judgt' 111<1\ 

Jl<JI ~1"<1111 till' 111<~fi<~:l ;ttHI cli'>lllh" illl' 

t'Oiltj~Ltirtl <ll' p:tll t.d tlH· C(ltllplairlt if 

1!11· :tdlltilthll'<tfi\<' !:1\\ _juclg1' find:-, rll.p111<' <lg<'ll<'\ lid'-, <.,)111\\'1\ !}.<lOll C<l\1'>(' lin 

dll\ d1·ld_\ i11 h~uill,C! iiH· 11()1 in• ol" j.li'<J 

pu-,vd civil jll'!l<lil_\ 

I~) 11" tlw ~~-~<'lltY 1";\iJ.., ro '>110\\ gcmd 

r•;_ill'<' fOI' :111\' lit']~\\ ;t!l ild!llil\hl!''-\l[\\ 

J;m _jttdgr· nt.t\ di__:tni--,._, till' ('<lltlpldiiH. 

1a· l'l1;~r Jlill't ,,J' 1lw ,·ln!lpl;.Jilll cdlv;..;irt_c; 

~~ \'i•>l<tr itnt rh;~r 111 curn·d 1non· t·hdll ~ 

\('ill"'> JwrO!'<• ill\ :tc_;l'IIC\ 'Ill 01"!\l"_\· i.-.,Sil<'d 

IIH• 1\0li<'l' ot prnpt)';f'd d\·il j)l'tl<tll\ Ill 

I !tr• 1'1'.'-;jlUild<•lll. 

(:\) .\ jl~H'!\ 111;1\ iljljl\",\1 d\1' illllllil\1'; 

11-dliU· )~1\\ jtH)_c;<··-., I'U)illg ()Jl r-]1,. 11111 

tiun l<t dhnli---;c; 1iw curnp!aint or iltl\ 

p<trt of rill' <'1\illpLiinl in iiCCilrd;uwl' 

~~- 11 11 !;; u.~ I'HhJ <)r , hi.,_ '-lthp<lt·r _ 

[.\tln1t u-n -,_J 1·- k :'Ill.! Juh :; 1!1~111, 

,JIII<'!Hi<·d IJ\ \dill! : ; .. ~~- _-,_) J-'1\ :1Jiilj, -\<1:: 

1'1'111) 

~ 1:t2n9 Answer•. 

(;\) \\'r·itill~ tt•quill'd . .-\ l"t·~pu1Hivllt 

·,iJ.J)I filt· <~ 1\t·it·tf·n dlh\'<'t· to tlw cuJtl 

pl:tinr Ill 11\il\ fij,• <I \\l'illt'fl lll<Hi<ll\ 

pur;;u.Jnl tu ~U.LWHd) c!l <jl:l.2!XIfJ(\ -ll 

ll)- I]Ji..., -...11iJpcH I ill'>il';tl] ,)j· !"iJiw~ ill I ill\ 

'>\1'1'1 !lUI L-11<"1" tltill\ :w dil\;; ,JI'tl'!' :c-.t'l'\ 

i1 r· oi' tll1• C•lltipLtiiJI rlw <lll'>l\'t'l nl;J\ 

IJ, ill tilt' J'<ll-111 or·;; [,•tilT Inti 11\T_J';( l;p 

ddio•d ;Hid -.,j_'-.\JI<'d !J\ till' pt'l"'-,(0!\ II' 

';jl011ili11g Ito tf\l" 1 <lll'!Ji,lilll. --\11 :lll'-,1\i'l 

JILl\ lw 1\jll'\\lill;'ll <II l!tl\ IH· l•·gi\Jh 

lldl!d\\ l'ill<'ll 

till hlirrg :.II H.) ~1ddr''"~ --\ pt'I':>!Jit I il i11.~2 

<Ill ;\11'>\1'1'1- .._))~!!] jH'I'-IHI<I]]\ tiv)i\'l'l Ill 

IIUiJ I]H' Ill i;J;iltid <llld Iilii' ("<I)!\ l!f' 1)\t' 

,\\1..,'-l•'t I'< II I ili11~ I\ it lr TIP• lw;lr'illg 

d<ICb·t t'll"t'k lllol ];Ill'! th,tll :lll d,!\'-., 

dflt'l --,1'1'\iCt· 1!1 tilt· l"<JIItjll.drlt", !11 liJ,• 

1-lvdlilt_~ l)<lt kt:l [-,•tl••l,i! .-\\"i,tlillll \d 

111i1ti---t r;11 i•1:1. sno lltdt·p•·JJd('lln· .\\'<'1\IH· 

'-.\\ h:•H\11\ )~-L\. \\;1-.,ilitt,'..;l.tlll. L)( :!(]_'i\1\ 

\llt'Hli<lli )]t•;Hill.~ ))fll_')-;t•[ l'il't-h_ !l!t' 

l''·r-...J!It li!ing <111 dll..,\\<'1- ~liuuld -..;u'-'-.'-'-''"r 

1<1< :r< i•JII l1n' 1 i:•· )t,.,~, in~ \'.lli'll fi li11c.> 

f! I< d!h\'.• 'I 

'1 1 '1,•( \ i1 I 

-.,IJ;J!i ';<'I 

\ 1wr ...,, 111 n 1 lit C.: :ur :t\1';\'-''' 

' up·, td d ltl· dlh\l<·r· f>ll ill<' 

.111 <)I I 11 ,, ,,_I !l) IiI' ·d I ill (-,I ill 

jd.1i1H 

«' ( t<lil<·i II'> \it .llh' .\'1 '- t.rli '>jh'l il i 

'-, l[! ', -.,1 .II< • '' ,. ,l) f ii 11\.11 \ (· d< ·f t'! I'-< 

:)/ 

§ 13.211 

dl ril<' li•.-dl"i!t:-; .. \ pt·I'<,Otl 1"\Jitlg dll dll 

'>l'.'<·r lttd\' in··ludr· d ht·it·l '>l<tl'l'llll'llf ":· 

:111\· rt·lit•l n•qtt('';\('tl i11 till· dll..,\\'1'1 

i<'l Sj!l'!'i!k ri<'lli;ll <II <tlk_~<.JtiO!I\ ,.,, 

qtlitt•d ,\ pt'!"'>t'll J'ilitl.!--', <ill dtl..,\\l'l '>IJctll 

;:d1nit d,•rn·. 11r c,t:trt· ril<~r r-lJ,. jli'I'>IJil h 

\\'ili!tl!ll ';ltf'J'i,_-j,'l\( !:.lllll'.']t•d'.!,(' 111' ill~-.,1. 

lltilf i<HI 1 <J cidJIIi I l)] dt•ll\" I'Cll"il lilllil 

lh·rt--d p-tl'd~l-~I)Jil 11f rh•• <'(JJltjJI;Hill. ·.-\11\ 

---r~lfl.'ll\<'111 or <~llvg.ttiort nHtl':litH·t) irt 

tfl,. t"UIIljiLdtll. 1)\,i! h Jt<ll' ':>jWtifi<,d!\ 

dl'llit·d ill rlil' ,\JIS\\"\'l" I lid_\- IH· dt't'lll•'d <.ill 

;tdmio.,'>illll <lf 1.111· (Tlllli \d. r!J.11 ;i)h·!-'-d 

1 irn1 \ g•·lll'r<tl dt•IJi<d nr rll\' co1npl~ti111 

h dt'\'llH·d :1 i'i.iiltil'l' ro filv .111 ;ltt;;\\',·r. 

II'J 1-'ctilur•• ftJ l"i!t• dll~I\'Pr .\ pt•rc,olt·-, 

!':tilur<• 111 filt· .tit ~Hl'>\\'t·t· ll[l'illnlr gur1d 

l';_)ll;-,1' ... )l:lll h·· ,j,.,.lll<'d .ill .tdltli-.,':>illll ,J! 

lltt· [1-LHil ot' i'ill'll ;l]]t•g;llit!ll ('(JI)f.titl<'d 

i I 1 till' o_'(Jilljl] dIll!'. 

~ I:t:!lO Filinl:{ of documents. 

loll Add\'!''>'> and llWihlld tll' filitt.l2, . .-\ )11'1 

';UII l'1'11dt•J'ill_:._: il diJClllll<'llt i'tlf' ii!i11~ 

-.,lt:tll jll'l'';lllldll\ dt•li\'('1" <)\' llldil lllt· 

-.,lglll'd origi11~:l iiiHl Dlh' C:Ojl_\- <II <':tCII 

duCUlllt'Ill (IJ 1lw I lt'i.ll-ill~ Ll()<.·kct. l·i·tl 

I'I'Cd .-\\-iilr i<JI\ :\dmilthl PII io11. XI){! lnd,• 

jH'llliL-Il<T ,\\\'lltll' S\\. J.:.:uolll ~)~-L\ 

\\ii'>ilin~IUIL IX. :!lh!ll .. \IU'Jtliun: l-11';\r 

iti,C: lltH_.kt<t Cl1•rk. \ jli'l''•llt '>ilc~ll ;-,i'l'\<" 

<I i'llj.l.\- ol t·<J(_ II dl:t"lltl\•'111 <lll t>;rr It p.lrl \ 

i11 ,1('\"IJI"d<tll<C' \1\I!J ~I:\.~] I <JJ" ([lj.., ~\!~~ 

p.n·t 

(IJI [l,til' of lili11g .\ d<l• llilll'lll _c,l1~1!1 iJ•· 

tlllhidt•n·d 111 IJo rilt•d till 1111' !bit· nl 

1'('1-'>tnl:i! di•[i\·1'1'\ · ur il tn:lilt-d 1lw 

tlliiiliti_C: dctt1· -.,ilut\ 11 <Ill rlw ,.,,1·1 ili.-:111' 

II( ',('1\ i«· til<' d.tl_t• ';iJ<l\\"1\ <))1 I ill' j!t•'>J 

[[l;trk if' tiH'tl j.., tlU n•ni!'ir<JII' ,d-'>1"1"\ 

ii'••. 111 Ill llt•J 111; li I i 11_c; d.ttt· '>II< l\\ II h'. 

,tlh·r •·1it!<·t1n· if' !hl'lt' h 11<1 <"t·rtiiit-<11< 

,,j ..,,.t 1 in· 111 P' I'> I llli.tl'k 

II') [--'ul Ill ) :;II"] 1 t h 11 t:ll I<' III --,ju i I In· 

t\"jlV\Ititi\·IJ <JI 1,·!-!iiJl\ l:;t;Hl'.'.ritl<'ll 

id: {iillll'lil.., llli<'"'- ••111<'1\'.h<· 'JH'< i 

ii.·d Ill 1 jjj_.., ';\!hp.i! I "It <ill• Ll!\lt'lll 

111\1'-l t I !It I ,'I i 11 .[ '-I!"!" I j':, II I 1 ._,!; ili'l 1 i<·tll 

ll( till' 1'.1< I'- <>11 \l·]:i,)l lilo• j!<'l"'>lll\-~ I'd',(· 

1<·-...IC, dill: hi• :· -,l,il<'ll~<'tll ol til•' .1< 

ll''llll."'i'l''"!'dl- ilwdti•!lllll\ll 

\1 «II 

~'I.:' I.; f ' 1 ' i ~ ~ '!'II' I 

\.(']<l'i':ll \ !I' l'Elil .... ll<il! "'I' 

o(Jp\· i\1 <til\ I:<HIIIIlt'lll JjJ,•d \'.ii:l 

I L- 'l \! i'.C: ! I,_,-:. ' ·''· !: I!· ll'l \ '1: 

Exhibit 0 

5 
Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Reza Sina <reza@sina!awgroup.com> 

Friday, October 07, 2016 3:08 PM 

Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

RE: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042; FDMS No. FAA-2016-8494 

Answer of Airpac.pdf 

Hi Lisa; 

Attached is the Answer to the Complaint. l reviewed the docket and the code and based the response on the 

September 8, 20 l6 letter ti·om FAA. 

Thank you for your assistance. 

Reza 

Reza Sina 

SINA LAW GROUP 

107 West Valencia Ave. 

Burbank, CA 91502 

Downtown Office 

888 West 6th Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Tel: (310) 957-2057 

rcZt.l'C:~~sina.la \Ygrou p .cun1 

vvwvv .sinZtla v\·grou p.n)nl 

This transmittal may contain privileged and confidential information, and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed 

above. If you arc neither the intended recipient(s), nor a person responsible for the delivery of his transmittal to the 

intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited. If you have 

received this transmittal in error, pleas(' notify Sina Law Group immediately 

--------- Originnl Message ---------

Subject: RE: Airpac Enterprises. lnc .. Case No. 20 l6WP9l0042: FDMS 1'\o. FAA-20 l6-8494 

From: LiscL~·l.lusc:.mo uJa~l.\.!.0\" 

Date; 9/29/16 2:)9 pm 

To: rcza ·u sinabt\Y!2rOU[).com 

.) 

Exhibit E 

1 
' ' ~ C, 'I·)·';: :: ') ',' -. -, '·'. 

From: Reza Sina [mailto:reza\alsinalawgroup.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 5:20 PM 

To: Toscano, Usa M (FAA) 

-.- ~- '·· .• t;_,._, ,._. 

~ ~ -' ' 

Subject: Re: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042; FDMS No. FAA-2016-8494 

Hi Lisa: 

I'm in trial in federal court in Downtown all week. Can I get an additional 10 days" 

Reza 

Sent ti·om my iPhone 

,. ' ~ 

2 Exhibit E 

2 
From: Reza Sina [mailto:rezacmsinalawgroup.com] 

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 2:31 PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Re: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

Thanks. Lisa. 

I will be out of town tor the next 2 weeks and wou1cl1ike to speak with you about the 

matter when 1 get back. 

Reza 

Sent [rom my iPhone 

On Aug 26. 2016. at 1:48 PM, <L.isa.\l.Toscarw'u iCHL~O\> <Lisa.i\L llbCano u rcn~m > 

wrote: 

i (: .-::' ,-·).I 

- -· _. 

3 Exhibit E 

3 
From: Reza Sina [mailto:reza@sinalawgroup.com] 

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 1:26 PM 

To: Toscano, Lisa M (FAA) 

Subject: Airpac Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2016WP910042 

Dear Ms. Toscano: 

Please see attached request for hearing. 

Thank you and have a wonderful weekend. 

Reza 

Reza Sina 

SIN A LAW GROUP 

107 West Valencia Ave. 

Burbank, CA 91502 

Oowutowu Office 

888 West 6th Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Tel: (310) 957-2057 

rcza,u:s i nab iYgrou p .corn 

\\'\ \' \ \' .sin;;1la \Yg-rou p.co tll 

This transmittal may contain privileged and confidential information, and is 

intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. If you are neither the intended 

rccipicnt(s), nor a person responsible for the delivery of his transmittal to the 

,intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any distribution or copying of 

this transmittal is prohibited. If you hove received this transmittal in error, 

please notify Sind Lnv Group immediately. 

4 Exhibit E 

4 
3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Reza Sina (SBN 250428) 

.SINA LAW GROUP 

107 Airpac Valencia Avenue 

Burbank. California 9 I 502 

Tel: (3 10) 957-2057 

reza@sinalawgroup.com 

Attorneys for Respondent, 

AIRPAC ENTERPRISES, INC. 

fEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF ADJUDICATION 

In the Malter of Airpac Enterprises, 

Inc., FDMS No. F AA-20 16-8494 

Case No. 20 16WP91 0042 

ANSWER Of AIRPAC 

ENTERPRISES, INC. 

- I -

A "SWER Exhibit E 

5 
Defendant Airpac Enterprises, Inc. ("Airpac'') submits his answer to the 

2 Complaint (''Complaint") of Federal Aviation Administration: 

3 GENERAL DENIAL 

4 By virtue of the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30, Airpac 

5 denies each and every allegation contained in the Complaint and each purported 

6 cause of action contained therein, and further denies that Plaintiff sustained c!amage 

7 in the sums alleged, or in any sum, or at all, by reason of any act, breach, or omission 

8 on the part of Airpac or on the part of any agent, servant, representative, employee, 

9 predecessor, or successor of Airpac. 

10 Airpac raises the following affirmative defenses 111 connection with his 

11 Answer: 

12 FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 

13 (Failure to State a Cause of Action) 

14 1. The Complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of 

15 action upon which relief can be granted against Airpac. The Complaint also seeks 

16 relief against Airpac that is not properly recoverable by Plaintiff. and Plaintiff is 

17 therefore barred from any recovery against Airpac. 

18 SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 

19 (Compliance) 

20 2. Plaintiffs Complaint and the allegations contained therein is barred or 

21 

22 

?" --' 

24 

26 

27 

28 

diminished, in whole or in part, by Airpac's compliance with the C.F.R. 

THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 

(Reasonable Belie1) 

At all times. Airpac operated with a reasonable belief that directors and 

officers were not required to be a part of the mandatory drug testing. 

- 2-

,\'\SWER Exhibit E 

6 
PRAYER 

2 WHEREFORE. Airpac respectfully prays for entry of judgment in its favor 

3 and against Plaintiff as follows: 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

1 1 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

24 

26 

27 

28 

I. 

7 

4. 

That Plaintifftake nothing by way of his Complaint; 

That the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice; 

For the costs of suit, including reasonable attorneys· fees; and 

For any other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 

Dated: October 7, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

SIN A LAW GROUP 

By: /s/ Reza Sina 

Reza Sina 

Attorneys for Airpac Enterprises, Inc. 

- 3 -

------------------~~-

A~SWER Exhibit E 

7 
PROOF OF SERVICE 

2 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles. State of California in the oftlce of a member of the 

bar of this Court at whose direction the service \Vas made. I am ovet· the age of 18, and not pat1y to 

3 the within action. My business address is I 07 West Valencia Ave. Burbank. C A 91502. 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

1 1 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

)' --' 

24 

25 

26 

28 

On 10/7/16.! served a copy of the following document(s) described as ANSWER TO 

COMPLAINT on the interested patty(ies) in this action as follows: 

Lisa M. Toscano, AWP-7.13 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

PO Box 92007 

L.A., CA 90009-2007 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearino- Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wrigj';t Bldg- Suite 2Wl 000 

X By Mail: By placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelopc(s) addressed as 

above. and placing each for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business 

practices. I am .. readily familiar .. with this business's practices tor collecting and processing 

correspondence for mailing. 

By Overnight Delivery: I enclosed the documents in an envelope or package provided by 

an overnight delivery carrier and addressed as above. I placed the envelope or package for 

collection and overnight delivery at an ofllce or a regularly utilized drop box of' the overnight 

delivery carrier. 

By Facsimile: Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service by t:1x transmission. I 

t'axed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed above. 

_X_ By E-Mail or Electronic Transmission: I caused the documents to be sent to the persons 

at the e-mail addresses listed above. I did not receive. within a reasonable time after the 

transmission. any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. 

X State: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on the above date at Los Angeles. California. 

/S/ Reza Sina 

Reza Sina 

~~------~------------------~4_-____________________________ _ 

,-\'\SWER Exhibit E 

8