alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
balance sheets and income statement of US WATS, Inc. and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                               1,455,186
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        7,185,957
<ALLOWANCES>                           672,058
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     8,106,410
<PP&E>                               5,905,583
<DEPRECIATION>                       2,305,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      11,992,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                10,320,796
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  300,000
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                15,902
<OTHER-SE>                             846,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        11,992,359
<SALES>                             40,304,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    40,304,442
<CGS>                               26,802,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    12,716,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       479,208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     272,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         95,625
<INCOME-TAX>                             7,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     88,625
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            88,625
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .00
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Mississippi v. William L. McCULLOM.

No. 47168.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 26, 1973.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by T. E. Childs, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellant.

Buchanan & Haltom, Indianola, for ap-pellee.

PATTERSON, Justice:

This is an appeal by the State from a decision of the Circuit Court of Sunflower County wherein a mistrial was ordered by the Circuit Judge in the trial of William L. McCullom for the crime of murder.

The State’s assignment of error is that the court erred *in*directing the mistrial. Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated section 1153 (1956), provides the categories in which the State or a municipality may appeal in criminal cases. Succinctly quoted, they are:

> “1. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to, or a motion to quash an indictment, or an affidavit charging crime; . .

> *“2.*From a judgment actually acquitting the defendant where a question of law has been decided adversely to the state or municipality ;

> “3. From a ruling adverse to the state or municipality in every case in which the defendant is convicted and prosecutes an appeal; . . . ”

The second and third categories above have long been held to authorize an appeal only from a final judgment of acquittal or conviction. State v. McDowell, 72 Miss. 138, 17 So. 213 (1894). An order of mistrial adjudicates nothing relating to guilt or innocence. It is therefore not a final judgment.

The jurisdiction of this Court has not been mentioned by either the State or the appellee, but we raise it on our own motion since, lacking it, we have no authority to decide the issue presented by the abortive appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

RODGERS, P. J., and INZER, ROBERTSON and WALKER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Sooner Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R.C. Cunningham III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  December 23, 2010/s/ R.C. Cunningham IIIR.C. Cunningham IIIChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sooner Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Sooner Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) Guarantee in Support of 

Cambambe Hydropower Plant, Angola

(HSBC Bank plc, Societe Generale SA, BHF-Bank Aktiengesellschaft)

U.S. Position

May 23, 2013

This MIGA-supported hydropower project will help Angola address its significant electricity 

needs. After decades of armed conflicts that severely damaged its energy infrastructure, Angola 

remains one of the most electricity-starved countries in the world despite its vast energy 

resources. With nearly 70% of Angola’s population lacking access to electricity, developing the 

country’s domestic power resources is critical to diversifying economic growth and improving 

the socioeconomic conditions of the Angolan people.

MIGA’s guarantee of the expansion of the Cambambe Hydropower Plant is an important step in 

helping the Government of Angola access private capital to fund its developmental needs. Given 

the country’s considerable oil wealth, the upcoming Country Partnership Strategy anticipates a 

shift in the Bank’s relationship with Angola toward technical assistance and away from 

concessional financing. In the absence of such concessional financing, the role of MIGA, as well 

as the IFC, in mobilizing private capital will grow in importance. In this context, the United 

States believes that MIGA’s guarantee of a private solution to Angola’s energy challenges will 

help improve the country’s investment climate, creating conditions that are conducive to privateled growth.

However, despite the considerable developmental benefits, this project has significant 

environmental and social risks. Furthermore, in light of a U.S. legislative mandate requiring that 

environmental assessments for all Category A projects be posted publicly for at least 120 days 

prior to Board review, the U.S. must abstain on this investment. The U.S. encourages MIGA to 

take every precaution in appropriately mitigating the environmental and social risks associated 

with this project.
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Joseph
Feldschuh, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that: I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Daxor Corporation; Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report; The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have: (a)  Designed
  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
  and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)  Evaluated
  the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
  presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
  this report based on such evaluation; and(c)  Disclosed
  in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
  reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
  (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
  has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting; and The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)  All
  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and(b)  Any
  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
  who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
  financial reporting.  Date:  May
  19, 2006/s/ Joseph
  Feldschuh, M.D.Joseph
  Feldschuh, M.D.President,
  Chief Executive OfficerAnd Chairman
  of the Board
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2020*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter -38.09

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-Year Note 10/15 52.00 2.00

10-Year Note (r) 10/15 35.00 6.00

30-Year Bond (r) 10/15 23.00 4.00 20.92 89.08

5-Year TIPS 10/30 17.00 0.00 0.00 17.00

20-Year Bond (r) 11/2 22.00 5.00

2-Year Note 11/2 54.00 2.00

2-Year FRN 11/2 26.00 2.00

5-Year Note 11/2 55.00 2.00

7-Year Note 11/2 53.00 3.00 136.30 73.70

3-Year Note 11/16 54.00 2.00

10-Year Note 11/16 40.00 2.00

30-Year Bond 11/16 27.00 1.00 60.88 60.12

2-Year FRN (r) 11/27 24.00 2.00 0.00 24.00

20-Year Bond 11/30 26.00 1.00

10-Year TIPS (r) 11/30 12.00 0.00

2-Year Note 11/30 56.00 2.00

5-Year Note 11/30 57.00 2.00

7-Year Note 11/30 55.00 2.00 77.57 128.43

3-Year Note 12/15 56.00 2.00

10-Year Note (r) 12/15 37.00 2.00

30-Year Bond (r) 12/15 24.00 1.00 18.97 98.03

2-Year FRN (r) 12/28 24.00 2.00 0.00 24.00

20-Year Bond (r) 12/31 23.00 1.00

5-Year TIPS (r) 12/31 15.00 0.00

2-Year Note 12/31 58.00 2.00

5-Year Note 12/31 59.00 2.00

7-Year Note 12/31 57.00 2.00 71.28 140.72

1041.00 385.91 655.09

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 617

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 11/02/2020 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1092 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-111-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Lon J. OlejniczakLon J. OlejniczakPresident
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Vernon BRANAUGH.

No. 60882.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Vernon Branaugh applying for writ of certiorari or review. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied.
#### Darwin HIGHSMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 8, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevm, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and P. A. Pacyna, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

Highsmith filed in the trial court an “Appeal for Justice” which the trial judge properly considered as a notice of appeal. In it he asserts that he did not and could not get justice in the court at Tampa because he is black. We have examined the record with care and find this contention groundless.

Highsmith was indicted on two counts of murder in the first degree. He was sixteen, and the charge was based on two instances in which a group of which he was a part committed armed robbery in the course of which the victims were killed. Even an unintentional killing in the course of robbery is murder in the first degree. Fla.Stat. § 782.04(3) (1969), F.S.A. And one who aids and abets the robber who kills is guilty in the same degree. Fla.Stat. § 776.011 (1969), F.S.A. So the fact that another man fired the fatal shots is immaterial.

Highsmith, perhaps because of his age, was allowed to plead guilty to murder in the third degree. His plea was accepted only after patient judges had determined its voluntariness. Highsmith was furnished counsel at public expense. They pursued the case with vigor, discovering the extent of the state’s evidence against Highsmith. The record shows a knowing and intelligent plea to these charges. The state’s willingness to accept conviction of a lesser offense was to Highsmith’s benefit, *295so that he need not face either the electric chair or life imprisonment. This record is free of error, and the convictions are

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2630 

To amend the Temporary Reauthorization and Study of the Emergency 

Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues Act to extend until September 2021, 

a temporary order for fentanyl-related substances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2021 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Temporary Reauthorization and Study of the 

Emergency Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues Act to extend until September 2021, a temporary order for 

fentanyl-related substances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extending Temporary 

5 Emergency Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2630 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY ORDER FOR 

2 FENTANYL-RELATED SUBSTANCES. 

3 Effective as if included in the enactment of the Tem4 porary Reauthorization and Study of the Emergency 

5 Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues Act (Public Law 116– 

6 114), section 2 of such Act (Public Law 116–114) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘May 6, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep8 tember 30, 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE> 1

         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C.  20549

                           FORM 12b-25

                   NOTIFICATION OF LATE FILING

(Check One)
[X] Form 10-K [ ] Form 20-F [ ] Form 11-K [ ] Form 10-Q [ ] Form N-SAR

For Period Ended: December 31, 2003

SEC FILE NUMBER:  0-27019

CUSIP NUMBER: 903644102

PART I - REGISTRANT INFORMATION

Full Name of Registrant: Uintah Mountain Copper Company

Address of Principal Executive Offices:
  2319 North Hillside Drive, Wellington, Utah 84542

PART II - Rules 12b-25(b) and c

If the subject report could not be filed without unreasonable effort or
expense and the registrant seeks relief pursuant to Rule 12b-25(b), the
following should be completed.  (Check box is appropriate)

[x]  The reasons described in reasonable detail in Part III of this form could
not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense

PART III - NARRATIVE

State below with reasonable detail the reasons why the Form 10-K, 11-K, 10-Q,
NSAR, or the transition report or portion thereof, could not be filed within
the prescribed time period.

  Certain aspects of the registrant's review process have not been completed
prior to the filing date.

PART IV - OTHER INFORMATION

(1)  Name and telephone number of person to contact in regard to this
notification:

Pam Kandaris-Cha (435) 820-6460

(2) Have all other periodic reports required under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter) period that
the registrant was required to filed such report(s) been filed?  If answer is
no, identify report(s).  [X] Yes  [ ] No

(3) Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations
from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by
the earnings statement to be included in the subject report or portion
thereof?  [ ] Yes [X] No

<PAGE> 2

If so, attach an explanation of the anticipated significant change, both
narratively and quantitatively, and, if appropriate, state the reasons why a
reasonable estimate of the results cannot be made.


                     Uintah Mountain Copper Company
              --------------------------------------------
              (Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunder duly authorized.

Date: March 30, 2004


By:  /S/ Pam Kandaris-Cha, Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35




May 15, 2002


Employee
Nuevo Energy Company
1021 Main Street, Suite 2100
Houston, TX  77002

Dear _______:

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors recently agreed to extend
the following benefits to you should your employment with the Company ever be
terminated without cause. The benefits should include the following:

         o        Two weeks base salary (excluding bonuses, commissions and any
                  other forms of incentives or overtime pay) for each continuous
                  full year of employment and a pro rata payment for any partial
                  year of employment with the Company as of the date of the
                  covered employee's termination of employment.

         o        One week of base salary (excluding bonuses, commissions and
                  any other forms of incentives or overtime pay) for each
                  $10,000 of annual income (which shall be the sum of base
                  salary and the highest potential award payable to such
                  executive under the Company's bonus program for the year that
                  the employee is terminated).

         o        All options previously awarded to you will, to the extent not
                  already vested, vest immediately and you shall have the lesser
                  of (i) 365 days or (ii) the remaining option term to exercise
                  any and all of your vested options.

You will not be entitled to duplicate payments if payment is due under any other
severance program offered by the Company. However, you will be entitled to
receive this payment in lieu of a severance payment.

A condition of the payment will be the requirement that you sign a general
release. In addition, it is required that you keep the existence of this benefit
confidential.

Please acknowledge receipt of this letter and your agreement to execute a
general release prior to receipt of the above-referenced benefit.

Sincerely,



James L. Payne


Agreed to:

By:
    ----------------------------
       Employee

Date:
     ---------------------------