alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(a)


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of Con-way Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas W.
Stotlar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
       and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.


Dated:  August 7, 2006



/s/  Douglas W. Stotlar
-------------------------
Name:  Douglas W. Stotlar
Title:  Chief Executive Officer






                                                                Exhibit 32(b)

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Con-way Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin C.
Schick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
       and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.


Dated:  August 7, 2006



/s/  Kevin C. Schick
----------------------
Name:  Kevin C. Schick
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,493,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  988,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,570,900
<PP&E>                                       5,607,200
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,103,800)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,168,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,491,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,113,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,168,500
<SALES>                                        859,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,307,400
<CGS>                                          433,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  433,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               885,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        







</TABLE>
#### Charles CAMERON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43024.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 26, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 267 So.2d 693.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             340
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,845
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,259
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            20,853
<LOANS>                                        221,101
<ALLOWANCE>                                        618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,809
<DEPOSITS>                                     222,768
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,413
<LONG-TERM>                                     25,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 278,809
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,934
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,675
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   188
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,797
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,593
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,933
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,864
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (9)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,451
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,545
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.03
<LOANS-NON>                                        883
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   616
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       58
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  618
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            618
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Prime Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2014 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date: January 14, 2016 |     |                                             
|---------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                       | By: | /s/ William Tsu-Cheng Yu                    
|                       |     | William Tsu-Cheng Yu                        
|                       |     | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                       |     | (Principal Executive Officer)               



|Date: January 14, 2016 |     |                                             
|---------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                       | By: | /s/ Amy Lau                                 
|                       |     | Amy Lau                                     
|                       |     | Interim Chief Financial Officer             
|                       |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         4049000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10919000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    237000
<INVENTORY>                                    6450000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              28464000
<PP&E>                                        29132000
<DEPRECIATION>                                19843000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40181000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         23217000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         23000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     9707000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40181000
<SALES>                                       15211000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              15211000
<CGS>                                         13378000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 15054000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              252000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (58000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     20000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (78000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  213000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    135000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kenneth E. Wolf, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Kenneth E. WolfName:

Kenneth E. WolfTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 14, 2007


A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and will be
retained by Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Frank Aljanor TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. NEW HAVEN TRUCK RENTAL, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 42455.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 16, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2599 

To provide a duplication of benefits fix for Sandy CDBG-DR recipients, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2021 

Miss RICE of New York (for herself, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. SUOZZI, 

and Mr. GARBARINO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide a duplication of benefits fix for Sandy CDBGDR recipients, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sandy Duplication of 

5 Benefits Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DUPLICATION OF BENEFITS. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 1210(a)(3) of the FAA 

8 Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–254; 132 

9 Stat. 3186) is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2016’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2012’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2599 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a) shall take effect as if included in the enactment 

3 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 

4 115–254; 132 Stat. 3186). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
AfDB’s Lines of Credit (LOCs) to Banque de Kigali and 

Banque Rwandaise de Developpement 

U.S. Position 

November 19, 2010 

The United States strongly support the objective of increasing credit available to private 

enterprises supporting growth of Rwanda’s agriculture and tourism sectors and contributing 

to improved infrastructure. The steps that Banque Rwandaise de Developpement (BRD) and 

Banque de Kigali (BK) have taken to modernize their management and improve their 

financial performance to support these lines of credit are positive. 

However, these LOCs should not be brought to the Board before the IMF and the authorities 

have reached agreement on the exclusion of the debt from these state-owned banks from the 

debt sustainability analysis and non-concessional debt ceiling. Further, the language in the 

proposal indicating this as a condition for loan signature in the appraisal reports is not 

sufficiently binding. In the future, Management should give more priority to debt 

sustainability concerns in situations like these. Otherwise, Board discussion on such projects 

should be postponed until after the IMF has provided its conclusions. 

The United States is also concerned about environmental issues. While AfDB’s assistance to 

the banks on developing environmental and social management systems is welcomed, these 

systems are very rudimentary. Moreover, the LOCs will be supporting projects with 

significant negative environmental impacts (category 1 projects). . 

Therefore, the United States abstains on these two LOCs since: (i) they will support category 

1 projects for which the disclosure period for environmental and social impact assessments is 

not adequate (less than 120 days) and (ii) because of the process and IFI coordination issues 

cited above.
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Columbus Southern Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael
G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris  _


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








May 1,
2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7432

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ZACHARY ADAM CHESSER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cr-00395-LO-1; 1:15-cv-01602-LO)

Submitted: May 14, 2018 Decided: May 22, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zachary Adam Chesser, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Zachary Adam Chesser seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his 

motion to appoint counsel and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district 

court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When 

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chesser has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Chesser’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33385]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 622

[Docket No. 940246-4137; I.D. 121697D]


Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; 
Snapper-Grouper Fishery off the Southern Atlantic States; Snowy 
Grouper; Commercial Trip Limit Reduction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Trip limit reduction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS reduces the commercial trip limit for snowy grouper in 
the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the southern Atlantic states to 
300 lb (136 kg). This trip limit reduction is necessary to protect the 
snowy grouper resource.

DATES: Effective 12:01 a.m., local time, December 20, 1997, through 
December 31, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Eldridge, 813-570-5305.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The snapper-grouper fishery off the southern 
Atlantic states is managed under the Fishery Management Plan for the 
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region (FMP). The FMP was 
prepared by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council and is 
implemented under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act by regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
    The commercial quota for snowy grouper, one of the species in the 
snapper-grouper complex, is 344,508 lb (156,266 kg), gutted weight, 
each fishing year. The fishing year is January 1 through December 31. 
In accordance with 50 CFR 622.44(c)(2), a commercial trip limit of 
2,500 lb (1,134 kg) applies until the quota is reached. When the quota 
is reached, or is projected to be reached, NMFS is required to reduce 
the commercial trip limit to 300 lb (136 kg), through the end of the 
fishing year.
    Based on current statistics, NMFS has projected that the commercial 
quota for snowy grouper will be reached on December 19, 1997. 
Accordingly, the commercial trip limit for snowy grouper in or from the 
EEZ off the southern Atlantic states is reduced to 300 lb (136 kg) 
effective 12:01 a.m., local time, December 20, 1997, through December 
31, 1997. During this period, no more than 300 lb (136 kg), round 
weight or gutted weight, of snowy grouper may be possessed on board or 
landed, purchased, or sold from a vessel that has a valid commercial 
permit for snapper-grouper per day. The possession of a valid 
commercial permit notwithstanding, the bag and possession limits apply 
when a vessel is operating as a charter vessel or headboat.

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 622.43(a) and 622.44(c) and is 
exempt from review under Executive Order 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 16, 1997.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-33385 Filed 12-18-97; 11:43 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F