66850 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 1997 / Notices

requesting postponement in this case as

well so that all of the antidumping cases

will remain on the same schedule and,

thus, permit the International Trade

Commission to cumulate the cases if it

deems appropriate to do so. For these

same reasons, petitioners also ask the

Department to postpone all of the abovereferenced cases by the same number of

days in order to ensure that they remain

on identical time schedules.

For the reasons identified by

petitioners, we are postponing the

preliminary determinations under

Section 733(c)(1) of the Act. We will

make our preliminary determinations no

later than February 25, 1998.

This notice is published pursuant

section 733(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR

351.205(f).

Dated: December 16, 1997.

Holly Kuga,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary.AD/CVD

Enforcement, Group II.

[FR Doc. 97–33350 Filed 12–19–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

Proposed Collection: Comment

Request

AGENCY: Air Force Junior Reserve

Officer Training Corps, Operations

Section.

ACTION: Notice.

In compliance with Section 3506 (c)

(2) (A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act

of 1995, the Air Force Junior Reserve

Officer Training Corps, Operations

Section, announces the proposed

reinstatement of a public information

collection and seeks public comment on

the provisions thereof. Comments are

invited on: (a) Whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information shall have

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed information collection; (c)

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the

burden of the information collection on

respondents, including through the use

of automated collection techniques or

other forms of information technology.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all

comments received by February 20,

1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and

recommendations on the proposed

information collection should be sent to

AFROTC/DOJ, 551 East Maxwell Blvd,

Maxwell Air Force Base, AL 36112–

6106.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To

request more information on this

proposed information collection or to

obtain a copy of the proposal and

associated collection instruments,

please write to the above address or call

AFROTC/DOJO at (334) 953–5116.

Title, Associated Form, and OMB

Number: Application for Establishment

of Air Force Junior ROTC Unit,

AFROTC Form 59, OMB Number 0701–

0114.

Needs and Uses: The information

collection requirement is necessary to

obtain information about schools which

would like to host an Air Force Junior

ROTC unit.

Affected Public: Schools which desire

to establish an Air Force Junior ROTC

unit.

Annual Burden Hours: 20.

Number of Respondents: 40.

Average Burden Per Respondent: 30

minutes.

Frequency: One time.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Summary of Information Collection

Respondents are high school officials

who provide information about their

school which is interested in hosting an

Air Force JROTC unit. The completed

form is used to determine the eligibility

of the school to host an Air Force JROTC

unit. If the form is not included in the

file, a school cannot be offered the

opportunity to host an AFJROTC unit.

Barbara A. Carmichael,

Alternate Air Force, Federal Register Liaison

Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–33347 Filed 12–19–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3910–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Public Hearing for the Draft

Environmental Impact; Statement/

Environmental Impact Report (DEIS/

EIR) for the Disposal of the Long

Beach Naval Station (NAVSTA) and the

Long Beach Naval Shipyard (NSY)

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Announcement of public

hearing.

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy

and the City of Long Beach have

prepared and filed with the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency a

Draft Environmental Impact Statement/

Environmental Impact Report (DEIS/

EIR) for the disposal of NAVSTA and

NSY and the subsequent reuse of those

properties and other adjacent properties.

A public hearing will be held for the

purpose to receive oral and written

comments on the DEIS/EIR. Federal,

state and local agencies, and interested

individuals are invited to be present or

represented at the hearing.

DATES: Hearing date is as follows:

1. January 14, 1998, 7:00 p.m., Long

Beach, CA.

ADDRESSES: Hearing location is:

1. Long Beach—the City of Long

Beach Council Chambers, 333 West

Ocean Boulevard, Long Beach,

California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

Melanie Ault, (619) 532–4744.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to the Council on Environmental

Quality regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–

1508) implementing the procedural

provisions of National Environmental

Policy Act (NEPA), California Public

Resources Code 21000 et seq., and 14

California Code of Regulation 15000 et

seq., implementing the procedural

provisions of the California

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the

Department of the Navy and the City of

Long Beach have prepared and filed

with the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency a DEIS/EIR for the disposal of

NAVSTA and NSY and the subsequent

reuse of those properties and other

adjacent properties. The DEIS/EIR has

also been prepared in accordance with

the Defense Base Closure and

Realignment Act of 1990 (DBCRA) (10

U.S.C. 2687 note) and the

recommendations of the Defense Base

Closure and Realignment Commission

approved by the President and accepted

by Congress in 1991 and 1995.

The purpose of the proposed federal

action is to dispose of NAVSTA and

NSY for reuse in accordance with

DBCRA established procedures for

closing and realigning military

installations. The portion of NAVSTA

addressed in this action includes the

main station, the Navy Mole, and Site

6A–LB. The Navy Fuel Depot, located

on the Navy Mole, was not declared to

be surplus to the needs of the federal

government and will remain the

property of the Navy. Of the 250 acres

NSY site, 84 acres are subject to

reversion under the terms of the final

judgment in United States of America v.

1039 Acres of Land etc. et. al. The Navy

has no discretion regarding the

reversion of this property. There are also

602 acres of submerged land that will

revert to the City under the terms of that

judgment. The remaining land at NSY

will be disposed of by the Navy under