TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 

TO: Jodi Howard, US EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/RCG 

FROM: Eastern Research Group, Inc. 

DATE: February 9, 2012 

SUBJECT: Generally Available Control Technology (GACT) Analysis for Area Sources 

in the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source 

Category 

1.0 Introduction 

This memorandum documents the methodology and results of the analysis of generally 

available control technology (GACT) options for the polyvinyl chloride and copolymers (PVC) 

production source category. An analysis of baseline levels of control for the existing area sources 

is presented as well as analyses of additional control options for the existing area sources. Also 

presented is an analysis of generally available levels of control for new area sources. 

2.0 Existing and New Area Source Facilities 

There are two existing non-major (area) sources of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) 

emissions in the PVC source category, CertainTeed Corporation’s Lake Charles, LA facility and 

Occidental Chemical (OxyVinyls) Corporation’s Deer Park, TX facility. Additionally, we do not 

expect any new area sources will be constructed in the next 5 years. 

2.1 Sources of Data

The determination of available technology for the control of emissions from existing area 

sources was based on data and information available from the two operating area source 

facilities, CertainTeed Lake Charles and OxyVinyls Deer Park. Data from major sources were 

also used to determine available control technology for stripped resin subcategories for which no 

area source data existed. These sources of information and data included the following: 

• Facility state operating permits (see Attachment A); 

• The companies’ responses to US EPA’s Clean Air Act Section 114 survey and testing 

requests (section 114) of August 21, 2009 and March 2011; 

• Additional information, data, and comments provided by CertainTeed Lake Charles, or 

its parent corporation, Saint-Gobain, during development of the PVC source category 

NESHAP rulemaking or following publication of the proposed rule; and 

• Additional information, data, and comments provided by OxyVinyls Deer Park, or its 

parent corporation, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, during development of the 

1
proposed NESHAP rule for the PVC source category or following publication of the 

proposed rule. 

2.2 Analysis of Data

2.2.1 General Process Description 

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility produces PVC via the bulk resin process in 2 

production lines and manufactured 447 million pounds of resin in 2008.Vinyl chloride monomer 

(VCM) is piped in from off-site and is polymerized in 9 polymerization reactors. Residual vinyl 

chloride (VC) is removed from the polymerized resin (stripped) in the reactor. Due to the nature 

of the bulk manufacturing process, the polymerized resin leaving the reactors is not dewatered or 

dried, but rather routed to resin hoppers where the resin is then screened and sent to storage silos. 

The resin is loaded into railcars and then shipped off-site. There is a VC recovery system 

(condenser) to recover VC that is vented from the reactors and wastewater stripper. 

Process vents from the reactors are routed to the VC recovery system along with the vent 

stream from the wastewater stripper where VC is recovered and the remaining gas stream is sent 

to a thermal oxidizer equipped with a packed bed scrubber for acid control. 

The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility produces PVC via the suspension resin process in 2 

production lines and has a reported production capacity of 550 million pounds per year. VCM is 

piped in and is polymerized in 8 polymerization reactors. After polymerization, residual VC is 

stripped from the polymerized resin in steam strippers. The stripped resin is dewatered in 

centrifuges and dried in flash dryers. The resin is then pneumatically conveyed, screened, and 

stored in silos. The resin is transported to customers primarily by rail, with the balance 

transported by truck. There is a VC recovery system (condensers) to recover VC that is vented 

from the process. 

Process vents, including vents from the resin stripper and the wastewater stripper, are 

routed to the VCM recovery system and the remaining gas stream is sent to thermal oxidizers 

equipped with spray nozzle scrubbers for acid control located at OxyVinyls LaPorte VCM plant. 

2.2.2 Regulations 

The CertainTeed facility is subject to 40 CFR part 61 subpart F, 40 CFR part 61 subpart 

V, and LA State Air Permit, 0520-00025-05, issued September 29, 2005 (see Attachment A) 

according to CertainTeed’s response to the August 21, 2009 section 114 request. 

In addition to the standards, limits, and requirements of the above, the CertainTeed 

facility must maintain the stripped resin limits as specified in 40 CFR 61.64(e). The methods and 

procedures of 40 CFR 61.67(g)(6) apply, and the facility must measure and record the residual 

VC in each batch of PVC product. Furthermore, the facility is subject to a state-only stripped 

resin permit limit for VC of 10 ppmw (LA specific condition 1). 

2
The CertainTeed facility must maintain continuous monitoring of thermal oxidizer stacks 

for VC emissions; the stack concentration cannot exceed 10 parts per million by volume (ppmv) 

over a 3 hour period. 

In addition, the CertainTeed facility must maintain a leak detection and repair (LDAR) 

program that meets 40 CFR part 61 subparts F and V; except with a leak definition of 1000 ppmv 

(state only permit condition for leak definition). The facility must also operate and maintain an 

ambient air monitoring system for VC in accordance with 40 CFR 61.65(b)(8)(i). 

The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility is subject to 40 CFR part 61 subpart A, 40 CFR part 61 

subpart F, 40 CFR part 61 subpart V, 40 CFR part 63 subpart F, 30 TAC 115, 30 TAC 116, 30 

TAC 106, 30 TAC 111 and TX State Air Permit, 4673B, issued July 13, 2009 (see Attachment 

A). 

In addition to the standards, limits, and requirements of the above, the OxyVinyls facility 

must maintain the stripped resin limits as specified in 40 CFR 61.64(e). The methods and 

procedures of 40 CFR 61.67(g)(3) apply. Furthermore, the OxyVinyls Deer Park is limited to a 

stripped resin VC limit of 8 ppmv on an annual average basis by the State Air Permit. 

2.2.3 Permitted Emissions 

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility has the facility-wide permitted emission rates as 

shown in Table 11. A breakout of those emissions by permitted emission point is shown in 

Table 2. 

Table 1. Facility-Wide Permitted Emissions for CertainTeed Lake Charles 

Pollutant Permitted Emissions

(tons/year) 

Carbon monoxide (CO) 5.7

Volatile organic compounds (VOC) 4.41

Vinyl chloride Monomer (VCM) 3.96

 



1

 See also memorandum titled “Potential to Emit Calculations for CertainTeed – Lake Charles, LA” from Eastern 

Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, dated April 8, 2011 (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037) concerning 

CertainTeed’s potential to emit. 

3
Table 2. Permitted Emissions for CertainTeed Lake Charles by Emission Point

Emission Point No. Emission Point CO

(tons/year) 

VOC

(tons/year) 

VCM

(tons/year)

1-76 Boiler 4.2 0.33 - 

5-76 Initial Classification (Unit 1 Poly) - 0.82 0.82 

6-76 Crusher Conveyor “B” Product - - - 

2-79A Thermal Oxidizer “A” 0.5 0.26 0.22 

2-79B Thermal Oxidizer “B” 0.5 0.26 0.22 

2-79C Thermal Oxidizer “C” 0.5 0.26 0.22 

3-87 Reactor Openings (9 reactors) - 0.04 0.04 

4-87 Fugitives - 0.5 0.5 

1-97 Initial Classification (Unit 2 Poly) - 0.43 0.43 

1-01 Stack (7-76, 8-76, and 9-76) - 1.51 1.51 

1-05 Classification Building #2 Bag-house - - - 

Totals 5.7 4.41 3.96 

CO – Carbon monoxide 

VOC – Volatile organic compounds 

VCM – Vinyl chloride monomer 

The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility has the facility-wide permitted emission rates2 as 

indicated in the attached facility permit, found in Attachment A. 

2.2.4 Section 114 Survey Responses 

As discussed in a separate memorandum1, both CertainTeed Lake Charles and OxyVinyls 

Deer Park facilities were included in the August 21, 2009, section 114 which collected data 

related to facility operations, emissions testing and resin sampling. As noted in the 

memorandum1, CertainTeed Lake Charles did not provide 30-day resin sampling information. As 

also discussed in the memorandum1, during the Deer Park facility emissions testing in response 

to the August 21, 2009 section 114, only the process vents from the PVC production were routed 

to the control system operated by OxyVinls LaPorte facility. OxyVinyls Deer Park provided 

additional emissions testing information in response to the March 16, 2011 section 114. For the 

March 2011 section 114, OxyVinyls performed emissions testing under normal operating 

conditions (i.e., all process vents normally routed to the control device were being controlled). 

The facility responses to the August 21, 2009 and March 2011 section 114 can be found in the 

docket. 

3.0 Determination of Currently Available Level of Control at Existing Area Sources 

 The level of control currently available to the existing area sources was determined for 

process vents, stripped resin, wastewater, equipment leaks, heat exchangers, storage tanks and 

other emission sources. The following section describes how the level of control currently 

available to the existing area sources was determined for each emission point. 



2

 See also memorandum titled “Potential to Emit Calculations for OxyVinyls – Deer Park, TX” from Eastern 

Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, dated January 9, 2012 (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037) concerning 

Deer Park’s potential to emit. 

4
3.1 Process Vents 

 The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility operates a PVC-only process vent, as defined in a 

separate memorandum2. The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility operates a PVC-combined process 

vent, also defined in a separate memorandum2. The level of control currently available was 

determined for each type of process vent. The level of control for both types of process vents was 

determined in a similar fashion to the MACT floors determined for process vents at major 

sources

2

 except that data from only the single area source in each subcategory were analyzed. 

Data variability was incorporated into the level of control currently available using the same 

methodology as described in the memorandum “Revised Maximum Achievable Control 

Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) 

Production Source Category2.” Non-detect (ND) values were also incorporated in the same 

manner as described the aforementioned memorandum. 

3.1.1 PVC-Only Process Vents 

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility submitted emissions testing information in 

response to the August 21, 2009, section 114 for VC, chlorinated dibenzodioxin and chlorinated 

dibenzofurans (CDD/CDF), total organic HAP and total hydrocarbons (THC). The level of 

control currently available for PVC-only process vents was determined using the CertainTeed 

Lake Charles emissions testing data. Tables 3 through 6 present the results of the variability 

analysis for VC, CDD/CDF, total organic HAP and THC for PVC-only process vents at area 

sources. The PVC-only process vent analysis for the level of control currently available at 

existing area sources is presented in Attachment B. 

 

5
Table 3. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Only Area Sources – VC

 Normal Lognormal 

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Non-Detects 0 0

Average (ppmvd) 5.24 1.66

Median (ppmvd) 5.24 1.66

Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 1.00E-02 1.91E-03

Minimum (ppmvd) 5.23 1.65

Maximum (ppmvd) 5.25 1.66

Skewness 0 -2.86E-03

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 5.30 5.30

Detection Limit Analysis 

Average (ppmvd) 5.24

RDL (ppmvd) 1.84E-01

3x RDL(ppmvd) 5.52E-01

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 5.3

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 5.3

ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points) 

3x Max DL – Maximum detection limit less than or equal to average multiplied by 3 

 

6
Table 4. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Only Area Sources – CDD/CDF 

(TEQ)

 Normal Lognormal 

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Average (ng/dscm) 3.11E-02 -3.56

Median (ng/dscm) 2.29E-02 -3.78

Standard Deviation (ng/dscm) 1.73E-02 5.15E-01

Minimum (ng/dscm) 1.94E-02 -3.94

Maximum (ng/dscm) 5.09E-02 -2.98

Skewness 1.65 1.53

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96

99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 1.29E-01 5.30E-01

Detection Limit Analysis 

Average (ng/dscm) 3.11E-02

RDL[1] (ng/dscm) 1.25E-02

3x RDL[1] (ng/dscm) 3.74E-02

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 

99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 1.29E-01

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 

99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 5.30E-01

[1] – Calculated based on data from various industries3

ng/dscm – nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, corrected to 3 percent oxygen, toxic 

equivalency basis 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points) 

RDL – Representative detection limit 

7
Table 5. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Only Area Sources – Total Organic 

HAP

 Normal Lognormal 

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Non-Detects 3.00 3.00

Average (ppmvd) 73.7 4.29

Median (ppmvd) 75.5 4.32

Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 10.7 1.49E-01

Minimum (ppmvd) 62.2 4.13

Maximum (ppmvd) 83.4 4.42

Skewness -7.36E-01 -9.07E-01

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 135 171

Detection Limit Analysis 

Average (ppmvd) 73.7

RDL (ppmvd) 1.81

3x RDL (ppmvd) 5.42

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 135

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 171

ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points) 

RDL – Representative detection limit

 

8
Table 6. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Only Area Sources – THC

 Normal Lognormal 

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Average (ppmvd) 16.6 2.78

Median (ppmvd) 15.3 2.72

Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 5.05 2.96E-01

Minimum (ppmvd) 12.4 2.51

Maximum (ppmvd) 22.2 3.10

Skewness 1.10 78.9E-01

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 45.32 86.912

Detection Limit Analysis 

Average in variability analysis (ppmvd) 16.6

RDL (ppmvd) 8.45E-01

3x RDL (ppmvd) 2.53

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 45.3

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 86.9

ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen as propane 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points) 

RDL – Representative detection limit

3.1.2 PVC-Combined Process Vents 

The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility submitted emissions testing information in response to 

the August 21, 2009, section 114 for VC, CDD/CDF, and total organic HAP; however, testing 

was performed under non-normal operating conditions3. The facility submitted additional testing 

data in response to the March 16, 2011 section 114. The March 2011 section 114 required 

facilities to test only for VC, CDD/CDF and THC; the facilities included in the section 114 were 

not required to test for any other HAP, nor did OxyVinyls Deer Park voluntarily test for any 

other HAP. As a result the level of control currently available for PVC-combined process vents 

at area sources was determined using the OxyVinyls Deer Park 2011 emissions testing data for 

VC, CDD/CDF and THC but not for total organic HAP because OxyVinyls Deer Park did not 

submit total organic HAP emissions data for its PVC combined process vent while operating 



3

 Please refer to the memorandum titled “Revised Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor 

Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category” section 3.1 for a 

description of normal and non-normal operating conditions. 

9
under normal conditions. The level of control currently available for PVC –combined process 

vents at area sources for total organic HAP was determined using data from the least controlled 

major source, the Westlake – Geismar facility. Tables 7 through 10 present the results of the 

variability analysis for VC, CDD/CDF, total organic HAP and THC for PVC-combined process 

vents at area sources. The PVC-combined process vent analysis for the level of control currently 

available at existing area sources is presented in Attachment C. 

Table 7. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Combined Area Sources – VC

 Normal Lognormal 

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Non-Detects 3.00 3.00

Average (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 -1.65

Median (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 -1.65

Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 3.40E-17 0

Minimum (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 -1.65

Maximum (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 -1.65

Skewness NA NA

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 1.93E-01

Detection Limit Analysis 

Average (ppmvd) 1.93E-01

RDL (ppmvd) 1.84E-01

3x RDL(ppmvd) 5.52E-01

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.93E-01

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.93E-01

ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points) 

RDL – Representative detection limit 

 

10
Table 8. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Combined Area Sources – CDD/CDF 

(TEQ)

 Normal Lognormal 

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Average (ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 -4.33

Median (ng/dscm) 1.07E-02 -4.54

Standard Deviation (ng/dscm) 1.06E-02 6.50E-01

Minimum (ng/dscm) 7.89E-03 -4.84

Maximum (ng/dscm) 2.74E-02 -3.60

Skewness 1.60 1.32

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96

99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 7.55E-02 5.34E-01

Detection Limit Analysis 

Average (ng/dscm) 1.53E-02

RDL[1] (ng/dscm) 1.12E-02

3x RDL[1] (ng/dscm) 3.35E-02

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 

99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 7.55E-02

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 

99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 5.34E-01

[1] – Calculated based on data from various industries3

ng/dscm – nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, corrected to 3 percent oxygen, toxic 

equivalency basis 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points) 

RDL – Representative detection limit 

 

11
Table 9. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Combined Area Sources – Total 

Organic HAP[1]

 Normal Lognormal 

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Non-Detects 3.00 3.00

Average (ppmvd) 4.02 1.00

Median (ppmvd) 1.93 6.59E-01

Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 4.28 1.06

Minimum (ppmvd) 1.17 1.58E-01

Maximum (ppmvd) 8.94 2.19

Skewness 1.67 1.31

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 28.4 1,126

Detection Limit Analysis 

Average (ppmvd) 4.02

RDL (ppmvd) 1.81

3x RDL (ppmvd) 5.42

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 28.4

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1,126

[1] – Based on data from least controlled major source for PVC-Combined process vents 

(Westlake Geismar) 

ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points) 

RDL – Representative detection limit 

 

12
Table 10. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Combined Area Sources – THC

 Normal Lognormal 

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Average (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 -2.21

Median (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 -2.21

Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 0 0

Minimum (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 -2.21

Maximum (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 -2.21

Skewness NA NA

SE Skewness NA NA

Skewness Test NA NA

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 1.10E-01

Detection Limit Analysis 

Average (ppmvd) 1.10E-01

RDL (ppmvd) 7.58E-01

3x RDL (ppmvd) 2.27

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.10E-01

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 

99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.10E-01

ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen as propane 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points) 

RDL – Representative detection limit 

Table 11 presents a summary of the level of control currently available at area sources for 

PVC-only and PVC-combined process vents. 

Table 11. Current Level of Control (as Concentration) Available at Existing Area Sources – 

Process Vents

Pollutant PVC-Only[1] PVCCombined[1] 

VC (ppmv) 5.3 5.6E-01[2]

CDD/CDF (TEQ) (ng/dscm) 1.3E-01 7.6E-02

Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 140 29

THC (ppmv as propane) 46 2.3[2]

[1] Current level of control concentrations were rounded up to 2 significant figures (e.g., 

100.1 would be rounded to 110). 

[2] Level of control result of detection limit variability analysis. 

CDD/CDF – Chlorinated dibenzodioxin and Chlorinated dibenzofuran 

13
HAP – Hazardous air pollutants 

THC – Total hydrocarbons 

ppmv – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen 

ng/dscm – nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, corrected to 3 percent oxygen, toxic 

equivalency basis 

3.2 Stripped Resin 

 The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility produces bulk resin. The OxyVinyls Deer Park 

facility produces suspension resin. The level of control currently available was determined for 

both types of resin in a similar fashion to the MACT floors determined for stripped resins at 

major sources except that data from only the single area source in each subcategory were 

analyzed. Data variability was incorporated into the level of control currently available using the 

same methodology as described in the memorandum “ Revised Maximum Achievable Control 

Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) 

Production Source Category2.” ND values were also incorporated in the same manner as 

described in the aforementioned memorandum. The analysis for the level of control currently 

available at existing area sources for stripped resins is presented in Attachment D. 

3.2.1 Stripped Resin - Bulk Resins 

 The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility did not report resin sampling results for the 4 year 

Method 107 data set or the 30 day sampling required by the August 21, 2009 section 114, as 

described in a separate memorandum1. For bulk resins, the level of control currently available at 

existing PVC area sources was determined using the survey data reported through the August 21, 

2009 section 114. Furthermore, statistical and variability analyses could not be performed since 

these types of analyses require multiple data points which were not available. Table 12 presents 

the level of control currently available for bulk resins at existing PVC area sources. 

Table 12. Average VC and Total Non-VC Organic HAP Concentrations in Bulk 

Resin at Existing Area Sources 

Company/Facility 

Average VC

Concentration[1] 

(ppmw) 

Average Total Non-VC Organic HAP

Concentration[1]

(ppmw) 

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 7.1 160 

[1] Average concentrations were rounded up to 2 significant figures (e.g., 100.1 would be rounded to 

110). 

HAP – hazardous air pollutant 

ppmw – parts per million by weight 

3.2.2 Stripped Resin - Suspension Resins 

 The current level of control for VC in suspension resins at existing PVC area sources was 

determined using 4 years of Method 107 concentration data at the OxyVinyls Deer Park facility, 

submitted by the Vinyl Institute. The current level of control for total non-vinyl chloride organic 

HAP (total non-VC organic HAP) was determined using the updated 30-day resin sampling data 

for OxyVinyls Deer Park. Table 13 presents the results of the 99.9 percentile analysis for VC and 

14
Table 14 presents the results of the total non- VC organic HAP variability analysis. The 

methodologies used to perform each analysis are described in a separate memorandum2. 

Table 13. 99.9 Percentile VC Concentration in Suspension Resin at Existing Area 

Sources 

Company/Facility 99.9 Percentile Value 

(ppmw) 

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 35.2 

HAP – hazardous air pollutant 

ppmw – parts per million by weight 

Table 14. Current Level of Control Available at PVC Area Sources – Suspension Resin – 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP

 Normal Log-Normal

Sample Size 27 27

Average (ppmw) 12.1 2.38

Median (ppmw) 8.98 2.20

Standard Deviation (ppmw) 6.25 4.65E-01

Minimum (ppmw) 6.25 1.84

Maximum (ppmw) 24.8 3.21

Skewness 1.01 6.97E-01

SE Skewness 4.71E-01 4.71E-01

Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

Kurtosis -5.92E-01 -1.06

SE Kurtosis 9.43E-01 9.43E-01

Kurtosis Test Normal Normal

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 2.48 2.48

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 27.9 35.0

Detection Limit Analysis

Average in variability analysis (ppmw) 12.1

RDL (ppmw) 4.75

3x RDL (ppmw) 14.3

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 27.9

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 35.0

ppmw – Parts per million by weight basis 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

RDL – Representative detection limit 

3.2.3 Stripped Resin – Dispersion, Suspension Blending, and Copolymer Resins 

15
 No existing area sources produce dispersion resin, suspension blending resin, or 

copolymer resin. However, if an existing PVC major source is able to become a synthetic area 

source (e.g., by taking a federally enforceable limit on its potential to emit) before the first 

compliance date, it would be subject to area source rather than major source requirements. 

Therefore, in order to develop GACT standards for other stripped resin subcategories, the level 

of control currently available to existing area sources for these resin types was determined to be 

equivalent to that of the least controlled existing major source for each resin type. For dispersion 

resins, the least controlled major source was determined to be the Formosa – Delaware City 

facility. The VC and total non-VC organic HAP analyses for dispersion resins are shown in 

Table 15 and Table 16. Since there is only 1 source in the suspension blending and copolymer 

resin types, the level of control currently available to existing area sources was determined to be 

equivalent to the MACT floor determination for suspension blending and copolymer resin types. 

The analyses for suspension blending and copolymer resin types are presented in a separate 

memorandum2. Table 17 presents a summary of the level of control currently available to 

existing PVC area sources for each resin type. 

Table 15. 99.9 Percentile VC Concentration in Dispersion Resin at Existing Area Sources 

Company/Facility 99.9 Percentile Value 

(ppmw) 

Formosa – Delaware 1,432 

HAP – hazardous air pollutant 

ppmw – parts per million by weight 

 

16
Table 16. Current Level of Control Available at PVC Area Sources – Dispersion Resin – 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP

 Normal Log-Normal

Sample Size 28 28

Average (ppmw) 67.6 4.00

Median (ppmw) 55.3 4.01

Standard Deviation (ppmw) 50.0 7.04E-01

Minimum (ppmw) 6.24 1.83

Maximum (ppmw) 267 5.59

Skewness 2.52 -6.73E-01

SE Skewness 4.63E-01 4.63E-01

Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

Kurtosis 8.89 2.56

SE Kurtosis 9.26E-01 9.26E-01

Kurtosis Test Non-normal Non-normal

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 2.47 2.47

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 193 319

Detection Limit Analysis

Average in variability analysis (ppmw) 67.6

RDL (ppmw) 4.75

3x RDL (ppmw) 14.3

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 193

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 319

ppmw – Parts per million by weight basis 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

3x Max DL – Maximum detection limit less than or equal to average multiplied by 3 

 

17
Table 17. Summary of Level of Control Currently Available [1] to Area Sources for Resins at 

Existing Sources 

Resin Type VC[2]

(ppmw) 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP[3]

(ppmw) 

Suspension 36 36[4] 

Dispersion 1,500 320 

Suspension Blending 140 500 

Copolymer 790 1,900 

Bulk 7.1 170[5] 

[1] – Levels of control were rounded up to two significant figures (e.g., 100.1 would be rounded to 110). 

[2] – calculated using 99.9th percentile. 

[3] – calculated using 99% UPL with m=1 

[4] – UPL value calculated as 35.003 ppmw – rounded to 36.0 ppmw. 

[5] – Rounded from 160.2 ppmw to 170 ppmw. 

HAP – Hazardous air pollutant 

Total non-VC organic HAP does not include vinyl chloride.

3.3 Wastewater 

 The level of control currently available at existing PVC area sources was determined for 

VC and total non-VC organic HAP for process wastewater. The CertainTeed Lake Charles 

facility provided wastewater concentration data at the wastewater stripper outlet in response to 

the August 21, 2009 section 114. The Vinyl Institute submitted year 2008 VC concentration data 

at the outlet of the stripper for the OxyVinyls Deer Park facility. For both facilities, the annual 

average VC concentration at the wastewater stripper outlet was determined to be 0.4 ppmw. 

However, a variability analysis was performed on the monthly OxyVinyls Deer Park data and is 

presented in Table 18. A variability analysis could not be performed on the CertainTeed 

concentration data since only 1 data point was submitted. The analysis for the level of control 

currently available at existing area sources for wastewater is presented in Attachment E. 

 

18
Table 18. Wastewater Stripper Outlet Concentration Variability Analysis for Existing Area 

Sources – VC

 Normal Log-Normal

Sample Size 12 12

Average (ppmw) 3.99E-01 -1.19

Median (ppmw) 2.89E-01 -1.24

Standard Deviation (ppmw) 4.16E-01 6.77E-01

Minimum (ppmw) 1.20E-01 -2.12

Maximum (ppmw) 1.67 5.14E-01

Skewness 3.05 1.32

SE Skewness 7.07E-01 7.07E-01

Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

Kurtosis 9.92 3.17

SE Kurtosis 1.41 1.41

Kurtosis Test Non-normal Non-normal

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 2.72 2.72

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 1.58 2.06

Detection Limit Analysis

Average in variability analysis (ppmw) 3.99E-01

RDL (ppmw) 1.00E-02

3x RDL (ppmw) 3.00E-02

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 1.58

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data

99.0% UPL (ppmw) 2.06

ppmw – Parts per million by weight basis 

SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) 

UPL - Upper prediction limit 

DL – Detection limit 

LN – Log normal 

3x Max DL – Maximum detection limit less than or equal to average multiplied by 3 

The level of control currently available to existing area sources at the wastewater stripper 

outlet for total non-VC organic HAP was determined using data submitted by OxyVinyls Deer 

Park in response to the August 21, 2009 section 114, as the CertainTeed facility did not provide 

any total non-VC organic HAP concentration data for the wastewater stripper outlet. OxyVinyls 

Deer Park only submitted 1 concentration value of 0.018 ppmw total non-VC organic HAP 

which was determined to be the level of control currently available to existing area sources at the 

wastewater stripper outlet on a monthly basis. Table 19 summarizes the level of control for 

wastewater at existing area sources. 

 

19
Table 19. Level of Control Currently Available to Existing PVC Area Sources for Process 

Wastewater 

Pollutant Level of Control Currently Available

(ppmw) 

VC (ppmw) 2.1 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP (ppmw) 1.8E-02 

HAP – hazardous air pollutant 

ppmw – parts per million by weight 

3.4 Equipment Leaks 

 Facility submitted survey information was reviewed to determine the level of control 

currently available for equipment leaks. Both facilities currently comply with the LDAR 

program requirements of 40 CFR part 61 subpart F and 40 CFR part 61 subpart V. Therefore; 40 

CFR part 61 subpart F and 40 CFR part 61 subpart V were determined to be the level of control 

currently available to existing area sources for equipment leaks. 

3.5 Heat Exchangers 

 

 Facility submitted survey information was reviewed to determine the level of control 

currently available for heat exchangers. A leak definition of 5,000 parts per billion by weight 

(ppbw) and monthly monitoring were determined to be the level of control currently available at 

existing area sources for equipment leaks. The analysis for the level of control currently 

available at existing area sources for heat exchangers is presented in Attachment F. 

3.6 Other Emission Sources 

Facility submitted survey information was reviewed to determine the level of control 

currently available for other emission sources. Each area source facility currently complies with 

40 CFR part 61 subpart F to limit emissions from reactor openings. Neither facility currently 

controls emissions from gasholders. Therefore, 40 CFR part 61 subpart F was determined to be 

the level of control currently available for other emission sources at existing area sources. 

3.7 Storage Vessels 

Facility submitted survey information was reviewed to determine the level of control 

currently available for storage vessels. Neither facility currently controls emissions from storage 

vessels. Therefore, no level of control currently available for storage vessels at existing area 

sources was determined. 

4.0 Determination of Expected Level of Control at New Area Sources 

New area sources are expected to be controlled as well as, if not better than, existing area 

sources. Therefore, the level of control available to new area sources was determined to be 

equivalent to the level of control currently available to existing area sources. Consideration was 

given to estimating the new area source level of control by using the best controlled existing area 

20
source. However, with data from only two facilities available for this GACT analysis, the 

analysis for PVC-combined process vents, PVC-only process vents, bulk resin, and suspension 

resin is based on data from only one facility. For the other emission points (except dispersion 

resin, suspension blending resin and copolymer resin discussed in section 3.0) both facilities are 

equivalent in terms of their current level of control. For example, for equipment leaks, the 

CertainTeed Lake Charles facility and the OxyVinyls Deer Park facility both comply with 40 

CFR part 61, subpart V; therefore, both facilities represent the best controlled area source. 

Consequently, the current level of control for new area sources was determined to be equivalent 

to the current level of control for existing area sources and, as a result, the remainder of the 

GACT analysis was determined to be equivalent for existing and new area sources. 

5.0 Annual Emissions Estimate 

 The annual emissions from each emission point for each area source facility were 

estimated using the same methodology as described in the technical memorandum titled 

“Revised Baseline Emission Estimates for Major Sources in the Polyvinyl Chloride and 

Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category4.” 

5.1 Process Vents 

 Annual emission estimates for VC, CDD/CDF and total organic HAP were calculated for 

process vents at each area source facility. Table 20 presents the results of the annual emission 

estimate calculation which is provided in Attachment B and Attachment C. 

Table 20. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Sources – Process Vents 

Facility Annual Emission Estimate (Tons/Year)

VC CDD/CDF (TEQ) Total Organic HAP

CertainTeed – Lakes Charles[1] 5.84E-02 1.32E-10 1.07

OxyVinyls – Deer Park[2] 2.79E-01 8.42E-09 4.61

[1] PVC-only process vent 

[2] PVC-combined process vent 

TEQ – Toxic Equivalency 

5.2 Resins 

 Annual emission estimates for VC and total non-VC organic HAP were calculated for 

stripped resin at each area source facility. As discussed in a separate memorandum, it was 

assumed that the total amount of all VC and other HAP in the stripped resin would be emitted 

from process equipment downstream of the resin stripper. For facilities that manufacture a type 

of resin other than a bulk resin, the majority of these emissions would likely occur from the resin 

centrifuge and/or dryer vents as the resin slurry is dried. However, the manufacture of bulk resins 

does not require the use of a resin dryer as the product is a solid and not a slurry after the 

polymerization process. Therefore, emission estimates reported in CertainTeed’s survey response 

were used to calculate annual emissions instead of assuming all residual HAP remaining in the 

resin would be emitted. Although there are no existing area sources that currently produce 

dispersion, suspension blending, or copolymer resins, annual emission estimates for such resin 

types were determined by assuming an annual resin production rate of approximately 4.4 million 

tons per year. A resin production rate of 4.4 million tons per year results in total annual facility 

21
emission estimates of less than 25 tons per year of total HAP for a model facility producing 

dispersion, suspension blending, or copolymer resins. Table 21 presents the results of the annual 

emission estimate calculation for resins which is provided in Attachment D. 

Table 21. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Sources – Resins 

Facility 

Annual Emission Estimate 

(Tons/Year) 

VC Total Non-VC

Organic HAP

CertainTeed – Lakes Charles[1] 9.39E-01 5.58

OxyVinyls – Deer Park[2] 2.38E-01 3.34

Dispersion Resin Facility 1.17 1.48E-01

Suspension Blending Resin 

Facility 3.43E-02 1.40E-01 

Copolymer Resin Facility 7.91E-01 1.95E-01

[1] Facility produces bulk resin. 

[2] Facility produces suspension resin. 

5.3 Wastewater 

 Annual emission estimates for VC and total non-VC organic HAP were calculated for 

process and maintenance wastewater for each area source facility. Table 22 presents the results 

of the annual emission estimate calculation for wastewater which is provided in Attachment E. 

Table 22. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Sources – Wastewater 

Facility 

Annual Emission Estimate 

(Tons/Year) 

VC Total Non-VC

Organic HAP

CertainTeed – Lakes Charles 3.91E-01 3.44

OxyVinyls – Deer Park 5.12E-01 8.81

5.4 Equipment Leaks 

 Annual emission estimates for total organic HAP were calculated for equipment leaks at 

each existing area source facility. As previously stated, the same methodology as described in the 

technical memorandum titled “ Revised Baseline Emission Estimates for Major Sources in the 

Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category4” was used except that 

equipment counts provided by CertainTeed Lake Charles were substituted where applicable; 

otherwise, equipment counts from a simple complexity chemical facility were used. Table 23 

presents the results of the annual emission estimate calculation for equipment leaks which is 

provided in Attachment G. 

 

22
Table 23. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Sources – Equipment Leaks 

Facility 

Annual Emission Estimate 

(Tons/Year) 

Total Organic HAP

CertainTeed – Lakes Charles 10.0

OxyVinyls – Deer Park 10.0

5.5 Heat Exchangers 

 Annual emission estimates for VC and total organic HAP were calculated for heat 

exchange systems at existing area sources. Table 24 presents the results of the annual emission 

estimate calculation for heat exchange systems which is provided in Attachment F. 

Table 24. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Sources – Heat Exchangers 

Facility 

Annual Emission Estimate 

(Tons/Year) 

VC Total Organic HAP

CertainTeed – Lakes Charles 5.31 5.31

OxyVinyls – Deer Park 1.25 1.25

5.6 Other Emission Sources 

 Annual emission estimates for VC and total organic HAP were extracted from 

information submitted in the August 21, 2009 section 114 for other emission sources at existing 

area sources. Table 25 summarizes the annual emission estimate for other emission sources 

provided in the survey. Survey information is presented in Attachment H. 

Table 25. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Sources – Other Emission Sources 

Facility 

Annual Emission Estimate 

(Tons/Year) 

VC Total Organic HAP

CertainTeed – Lakes Charles 3.35E-02 3.35E-02

OxyVinyls – Deer Park 3.04E-01 3.06E-01

5.7 Storage Vessels 

 Annual emission estimates for VC and total organic HAP were extracted from 

information submitted in the August 21, 2009 section 114 for storage vessels at existing area 

sources. Table 26 summarizes the annual emission estimate for storage vessels provided in the 

survey. Survey information is presented in Attachment J. 

 

23
Table 26. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Sources – Storage Vessels 

Facility 

Annual Emission Estimate 

(Tons/Year) 

VC Total Organic HAP

CertainTeed – Lakes Charles - 1.00E-04

OxyVinyls – Deer Park 3.36E-01 4.92E-01

6.0 Control Options Analysis 

For each emission point, multiple control options beyond level of control currently 

available were evaluated on a basis of cost effectiveness (i.e., dollars per ton of total organic 

HAP reduced per year). The following section describes how the costs of such controls and the 

associated emission reductions were calculated. 

6.1 Process Vents 

 Two control options beyond the level of control currently being used were evaluated for 

each type of process vent. The first option was requiring the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping 

and reporting requirements for major sources in addition to the level of control currently being 

used by existing area sources. The same methodology used to calculate testing, monitoring, 

recordkeeping and reporting costs for major sources was used for area sources and is described 

in a separate memorandum5. Table 27 summarizes the costs of requiring major source testing, 

monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting for area source facilities. No emission reductions are 

expected as a result of area sources complying with the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and 

reporting requirements for major sources. The testing and monitoring cost algorithm for PVConly process vents and PVC-combined process vents is presented in Attachment B and C 

respectively. The recordkeeping and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. 

Table 27. Summary of Costs for Major Source Testing, Monitoring, Recordkeeping and 

Reporting for Area Sources – Process Vents 

Facility 

Initial Costs Annual Costs Total Costs

Testing and 

Monitoring 

($) 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

($) 

Testing and 

Monitoring 

($/yr) 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

($/yr) 

Initial 

Cost ($) 

Annual 

Cost 

($/yr) 

CertainTeed - Lake 

Charles 43,198 4,963 8,640 2,250 48,161 10,890 

OxyVinyls - Deer 

Park 43,198 4,963 8,640 2,250 48,161 10,890 

 The second option analyzed for process vents consisted of area sources complying with 

the emission limits for existing major sources in addition to the testing and monitoring 

requirements for existing major sources. As shown in Table 28, the CertainTeed Lake Charles 

facility does not meet the major source emission limits for PVC-only process vents; however, the 

OxyVinyls Deer Park facility meets the major source emission limits for PVC-combined process 

vents. The cost of installing and operating a refrigerated condenser at the CertainTeed Lake 

Charles facility was estimated. Emission reductions as a result of meeting the major source 

emission limits for PVC-only process vents were also calculated. Costs and emission reductions 

24
were estimated using the same methodology presented in the memorandum titled “Revised Costs 

and Emission Reductions for Major Sources in the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) 

Production Source Category5.” The costs of installing and operating a refrigerated condenser are 

presented in Table 29. The cost effectiveness of existing area sources complying with the major 

source emission limits for PVC-only process vents is presented in Table 30. The analysis is 

presented in Attachment B. 

Table 28. Summary of Existing Area Source Performance Compared to Existing Major 

Source Emission Limits – Process Vents 

Facility Pollutant 

Average 

Facility 

Concentration 

Major 

Source 

Emission 

Limit 

Percent 

Reduction 

Required to 

Meet Major 

Source Limit 

Emission Reductions 

as a Result of 

Meeting Major 

Source Limit 

(Tons/Year) 

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 

(PVC-Only) 

VC (ppmv) 5.25 6.0 - 1.40E-02[1]

CDD/CDF (TEQ) (ng/dscm) 3.11E-02 3.8E-02 - 3.17E-011

[1]

Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 73.7 56 24.0 2.57E-01 

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 

(PVC-Combined) 

VC (ppmv) 1.93E-01 1.1 - - 

CDD/CDF (TEQ) (ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 5.1E-02 - - 

Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 4.02 9.8 - - 

[1] Emission reductions are a result of co-control 

TPY – Tons per year 

VC – Vinyl Chloride 

CDD/CDF – Chlorinated dibenzodioxin and chlorinated dibenzofuran 

HAP – Hazardous air pollutants 

ppmv – parts per million on a dry volume basis, corrected to 3 percent oxygen 

ng/dscm – nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, corrected to 3 percent oxygen 

Table 29. Summary of Costs for Existing Area Sources Complying with Existing Major 

Source Emission Limits for PVC-Only Process Vents 

Facility Control Equipment Capital 

Cost ($) 

Control Equipment 

Annualized Capital 

Costs ($/yr) 

Control Equipment 

Annual Costs ($/yr) 

Total Annualized 

Costs ($/yr) 

CertainTeed -

Lake Charles 

(PVC-Only) 

302,550 28,559 140,797 169,355 

$ - Dollars 

$/yr - Dollars per year 

Table 30. Summary of Cost Effectiveness for Existing Area Sources Complying with 

Existing Major Source Emission Limits for PVC-Only Process Vents 

Facility 

Total 

Annualized 

Costs[1] ($/yr) 

Annual Emission 

Reductions (as Total 

Organic HAP) 

(Tons/Year) 

Cost Effectiveness 

(Total Organic HAP Basis) 

 ($/Ton) 

CertainTeed - Lake Charles (PVC-Only) 180,245 2.57E-01 701,814 

[1] Includes annual cost of testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting in addition to annualized control equipment costs 

HAP – Hazardous air pollutants 

$/yr – Dollars per year 

6.1 Stripped Resins 

25
 Two control options beyond the level of control currently being used were evaluated for 

each type of resin that could potentially be produced at existing area sources. The first option 

was requiring the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for major 

sources in addition to the level of control currently available at existing area sources. The same 

methodology used to calculate testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting costs for major 

sources was used for area sources and is described in a separate memorandum5. Table 31 

summarizes the costs of requiring major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting 

for area source facilities. No emission reductions are expected as a result of area sources 

complying with the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for major 

sources. The testing and monitoring cost algorithm for stripped resins is presented in 

Attachment D. The recordkeeping and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. 

Table 31. Summary of Costs for Major Source Testing, Monitoring, Recordkeeping and 

Reporting for Area Sources - Resins 

Facility 

Initial Costs Annual Costs Total Costs

Testing and 

Monitoring 

($) 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

($) 

Testing and 

Monitoring 

($/yr) 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

($/yr) 

Initial 

Cost ($) 

Annual 

Cost 

($/yr) 

CertainTeed - Lake 

Charles 1,803 2,516 7,212 3,403 4,319 10,615 

OxyVinyls - Deer 

Park 1,803 2,516 7,212 3,403 4,319 10,615 

$ - Dollars 

$/yr – Dollars per year 

The second option analyzed for resins consisted of area sources complying with the 

emission limits for existing major sources in addition to the testing and monitoring requirements 

for existing major sources. As shown in Table 32, all the levels of control currently available at 

existing area sources are below the major source resin limits for each resin type; therefore, no 

emission reductions or cost of controls were estimated. 

Table 32. Summary of Existing Area Source Performance Compared to Existing Major 

Source Concentration Limits – Resins 

Facility (Resin Type) Pollutant 

Average Facility 

Concentration 

(ppmw) 

Major Source 

Concentration 

Limit (ppmw) 

Percent Reduction 

Required to Meet 

Major Source Limit 

CertainTeed - Lake 

Charles (Bulk) 

VC 7.1 7.1 - 

Total Non-VC 

Organic HAP 160 170 - 

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 

(Suspension) 

VC 8.64E-01 37 - 

Total Non-VC 

Organic HAP 12.1 670 - 

(Dispersion[1]) 

VC 534 1300 - 

Total Non-VC 

Organic HAP 67.6 240 - 

(Suspension 

Blending[1]) 

VC 15.7 140 - 

Total Non-VC 

Organic HAP 64.2 500 - 

26
Facility (Resin Type) Pollutant 

Average Facility 

Concentration 

(ppmw) 

Major Source 

Concentration 

Limit (ppmw) 

Percent Reduction 

Required to Meet 

Major Source Limit 

(Copolymer[1]) 

VC 361 790 - 

Total Non-VC 

Organic HAP 893 1900 - 

[1] - No existing area sources produce dispersion resin, suspension blending resin, or copolymer resin. The 

average facility concentration from the least controlled major source was used to model the average 

concentration of existing area sources. 

VC – Vinyl chloride 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total non-vinyl chloride organic HAP 

HAP – Hazardous air pollutant 

ppmw – Parts per million by weight 

6.3 Process and Maintenance Wastewater 

 Three control options beyond the level of control currently being used were evaluated for 

process and maintenance wastewater at existing area sources. The first option was requiring the 

testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for major sources in addition to 

the level of control currently available at existing area sources. The same methodology used to 

calculate testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting costs for major sources was used for 

area sources and is described in a separate memorandum5. Table 33 summarizes the costs of 

requiring major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting for area source facilities. 

No emission reductions are expected as a result of area sources complying with the testing, 

monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for major sources. The testing and 

monitoring cost algorithm for wastewater is presented in Attachment E. The recordkeeping and 

reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. 

Table 33. Summary of Costs for Major Source Testing, Monitoring, Recordkeeping and 

Reporting for Area Sources - Wastewater 

Facility 

Initial Costs Annual Costs Total Costs

Testing and 

Monitoring 

($) 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting[1]

($) 

Testing 

and 

Monitorin

g ($/yr) 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

($/yr) 

Initial 

Cost ($) 

Annual 

Cost 

($/yr) 

CertainTeed - Lake 

Charles 981 2,734 6,377 3,512 3,715 9,888 

OxyVinyls - Deer 

Park 981 2,734 6,377 3,512 3,715 9,888 

[1] Costs for recordkeeping and reporting include development of a maintenance wastewater work practice plan 

$ - Dollars 

$/yr – Dollars per year 

 The second option analyzed for wastewater consisted of area sources complying with the 

emission limits for existing major sources in addition to the testing and monitoring requirements 

for existing major sources. As shown in Table 34, the level of control currently available at 

existing area sources is below the major source wastewater concentration limits; therefore, no 

emission reductions or cost of controls were estimated for the second option. 

27
Table 34. Summary of Existing Area Source Performance Compared to Existing Major 

Source Concentration Limits – Process Wastewater 

Facility Pollutant 

Average Facility 

Stripper Outlet 

Concentration 

Average 

Uncontrolled 

Wastewater 

Concentration 

Existing 

Major Source 

Concentration 

Limit 

CertainTeed - Lake 

Charles 

VC (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.50E-03 6.8 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 

(ppmw) 0.018[1] 13.8[3] 110 

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 

VC (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.50E-03[2] 6.8 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 

(ppmw) 0.018 13.8[3] 110 

[1] Estimated based on average concentration of OxyVinyls Deer Park facility 

[2] Estimated based on average concentration of CertainTeed Lake Charles facility 

[3] Estimated based on average concentration of all major source facilities 

VC – Vinyl Chloride 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total non-vinyl chloride organic HAP 

HAP - Hazardous air pollutants 

ppmw – parts per million by weight 

 The third option analyzed for wastewater consisted of area sources complying with the 

concentration limits for new major sources in addition to the testing and monitoring requirements 

for existing major sources. As shown in Table 35, both facilities would be required to collect and 

treat previously uncontrolled wastewater streams in addition to further VC reduction in streams 

currently treated by the wastewater stripper. Using the same methodology described in the 

memorandum titled “Revised Beyond-the-Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and 

Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category6” costs were estimated for both existing area 

source facilities to install and maintain hard piping to convey previously uncontrolled streams to 

the wastewater collection system. The cost of installing and maintaining a wastewater stripper 

sized to accommodate the additional wastewater was also estimated. Emission reductions were 

estimated using the methodology presented in a separate memorandum6. The costs of installing 

and operating hard piping and a new wastewater stripper at both existing area source facilities 

are presented in Table 36. The cost effectiveness of existing area sources complying with the 

major source wastewater concentration limits is presented in Table 37.The wastewater cost and 

emission reduction analysis is presented in Attachment E. 

Table 35. Summary of Existing Area Source Performance Compared to New Major Source 

Concentration Limits – Process Wastewater 

Facility Pollutant 

Average Facility 

Stripper Outlet 

Concentration 

Average 

Uncontrolled 

Wastewater 

Concentration 

New Major 

Source 

Emission 

Limit 

Emission 

Reductions as 

a Result of 

Meeting 

Major Source 

Limit 

(Tons/Year) 

CertainTeed - Lake 

Charles 

VC (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.50E-03 2.8E-01 1.80E-06 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 

(ppmw) 0.018[1] 13.8[3]

1.8E-02 3.42 

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 

VC (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.50E-03[2] 2.8E-01 8.55E-03 

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 

(ppmw) 0.018 13.8[3]

1.8E-02 8.78 

[1] Estimated based on average concentration of OxyVinyls Deer Park facility 

[2] Estimated based on average concentration of CertainTeed Lake Charles facility 

[3] Estimated based on average concentration of all major source facilities 

VC – Vinyl Chloride 

28
Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total non-vinyl chloride organic HAP 

HAP - Hazardous air pollutants 

ppmw – parts per million by weight 

Table 36. Summary of Costs for Existing Area Sources Complying with Major New Source 

Concentration Limits for Process Wastewater 

Facility Control Equipment 

Capital Cost ($) 

Control Equipment 

Annualized Capital 

Costs ($/yr) 

Control Equipment 

Annual Costs ($/yr) 

Total Annualized 

Costs ($/yr) 

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 4,312,496 407,064 588,583 995,647 

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 8,050,612 759,910 1,221,056 1,980,967 

$ - Dollars 

$/yr – Dollars per year 

Table 37. Summary of Cost Effectiveness for Existing Area Sources Complying with New 

Major Source Concentration Limits for Process Wastewater 

Facility 

Total 

Annualized 

Costs[1] ($/yr) 

Annual Emission 

Reductions (as Total 

Organic HAP[2]) 

(Tons/Year) 

Cost Effectiveness 

(Total Organic HAP Basis) 

 ($/Ton) 

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 1,005,535 3.42 294,016 

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 1,990,855 8.79 226,491 

Total 2,966,390 12.2 245,516 

[1] Includes annual cost of testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting in addition to annualized control equipment costs 

[2] Total Organic HAP includes VC 

TPY – Tons per year 

HAP – Hazardous air pollutants 

$ - Dollars 

$ /yr – Dollars per year 

6.4 Equipment Leaks 

 For equipment leaks, the option of requiring area sources to comply with the existing 

major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements was analyzed. The 

cost and emission reductions of area sources complying with the LDAR program in 40 CFR part 

63, subpart UU was estimated using the methodology presented in a separate memorandum6

except that equipment counts provided by CertainTeed Lake Charles were substituted for 

existing area sources, where applicable; otherwise, equipment counts from a simple complexity 

chemical facility were used. The cost of existing area sources installing a wireless electronic 

pressure relief device (PRD) monitoring system was also estimated using the methodology 

presented in a separate memorandum5. Table 38 presents a summary of the costs of existing area 

source facilities complying with 40 CFR part 63, subpart UU and installing wireless electronic 

PRD monitoring systems. The analysis for area sources complying with subpart UU and 

installing a wireless PRD monitoring system is presented in Attachment G. The recordkeeping 

and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. Table 39 presents the emission 

reductions and cost effectiveness associated with existing area sources complying with subpart 

UU and installing a wireless electronic PRD monitoring system. 

29
Table 38. Summary of Costs for Existing Area Sources Complying with Existing Major 

Source Equipment Leak Requirements 

Facility 

Initial Costs ($) Annual Costs ($/yr) Total Costs 

LDAR 

Capital 

Cost of 

PRD 

System 

Initial 

Recordkeeping 

and 

Reporting 

Annualized 

Initial Cost 

of LDAR 

Annualized 

Capital Cost 

of PRD 

System 

Annual 

LDAR 

Cost[1] 

Annual 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

Total 

Initial Cost 

($) 

Annualized 

Cost ($/yr) 

CertainTeed - 

Lake Charles 64,244 113,116 2,625 9,171 16,105 6,496 4,491 179,985 36,263 

OxyVinyls -

Deer Park 64,244 113,116 2,625 9,171 16,105 6,496 4,491 179,985 36,263 

Total 128,488 226,232 5,250 18,341 32,210 12,993 8,982 359,790 72,525 

[1] Incremental cost from subpart V to subpart UU 

$ - Dollars 

$/yr – Dollars per year 

Table 39. Summary of Cost Effectiveness for Existing Area Sources Complying with 

Existing Major Source Equipment Leak Requirements 

Facility 

Total 

Annualized 

Cost ($/yr) 

Annual Emission 

Reductions (as Total 

Organic HAP) 

(Tons/Year) 

Cost Effectiveness 

(Total Organic HAP 

Basis) 

 ($/Ton) 

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 36,263 4.64 7,807 

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 36,263 4.64 7,807 

Total 72,525 9.29 7,807 

$ - Dollars 

$/yr – Dollars per year 

6.5 Heat Exchange Systems 

 For heat exchangers, the option of requiring area sources to comply with the existing 

major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements was analyzed. The 

cost and emission reductions of area sources complying with the existing major source leak 

action level and monitoring interval was estimated using the methodology presented in a separate 

memorandum6. The heat exchanger analysis is presented in Attachment F. The recordkeeping 

and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. Table 40 presents the costs, emission 

reductions, and cost effectiveness of existing area source facilities complying with the existing 

major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for heat exchange 

systems. 

Table 39. Summary of Costs, Emission Reductions and Cost Effectiveness for Existing Area 

Sources Complying with Existing Major Source Heat Exchange System Requirements 

Facility 

Initial 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

Cost ($) 

Annual 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

Cost ($/yr) 

Annual Cost 

of Repair[1]

($/yr) 

Total Annual 

Cost ($/yr) 

Total Organic 

HAP 

Emission 

Reduction 

(TPY) 

Cost 

Effectiveness 

(Total 

Organic HAP 

Basis) ($/Ton) 

CertainTeed 

Lake Charles 3,713 4,164 8,600 12,764 3.67 3,478 

OxyVinyls 

Deer Park 3,713 4,164 8,600 12,764 11.4 1,119 

30
Facility 

Initial 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

Cost ($) 

Annual 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

Cost ($/yr) 

Annual Cost 

of Repair[1]

($/yr) 

Total Annual 

Cost ($/yr) 

Total Organic 

HAP 

Emission 

Reduction 

(TPY) 

Cost 

Effectiveness 

(Total 

Organic HAP 

Basis) ($/Ton) 

Total 7,425 8,328 17,200 25,529 15.1 1,690 

[1] – Cost of repair estimated at $4,300 per cooling tower 

6.6 Other Emission Sources 

 For other emission sources, the option of requiring area sources to comply with the 

existing major source requirements was analyzed. Existing major sources must comply with the 

equipment opening requirements from 40 CFR part 61, subpart F in addition to work practices 

for gasholders (i.e., floating objects on the gasholder water seal). The current level of control for 

existing area sources is equivalent to 40 CFR part 61, subpart F for equipment openings; 

however, neither of the existing area sources use gasholders in the production of PVC. 

Therefore, the costs and emission reductions for major source work practices applied to a 

gasholder at a model area source facility were estimated using the same methodology presented 

in a separate memorandum6. The analysis of requiring major source work practices for 

gasholders at existing area sources is presented in Attachment H. The recordkeeping and 

reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. Table 40 presents the costs, emission 

reductions, and cost effectiveness of existing area source facilities complying with the existing 

major source requirements for other emission sources. 

Table 40. Summary of Costs, Emission Reductions and Cost Effectiveness for Existing Area 

Sources Complying with Existing Major Source Other Emission Sources Requirements 

Facility 

Capital 

Cost of 

Gasholder 

Work 

Practice 

($) 

Initial 

Recordkeeping and 

Reporting 

Cost ($) 

Annualized 

Capital 

Cost ($/yr) 

Annual 

Recordkeeping 

and Reporting 

Cost ($/yr) 

Annual 

Work 

Practice 

Cost 

($/yr) 

Total 

Initial 

Cost 

($) 

Total 

Annual 

Cost 

($/yr) 

Total 

Organic 

HAP 

Emission 

Reduction 

(TPY) 

Cost 

Effectiveness 

(Total 

Organic 

HAP Basis) 

($/Ton) 

CertainTeed 

Lake Charles - 1,102 - 1,554 - 1,102 1,554 

- - 

OxyVinyls 

Deer Park - 1,102 - 1,554 - 1,102 1,554 

- - 

Model Area 

Source[2] 5,000 1,102 928 1,554 550 6,102 3,032 0.62 4,922 

Total[1] - 2,204 - 3,108 - 2,204 3,108 - - 

[1] – Total costs do not include model area source. 

[2] – Model area source included in table for illustrative purposes. 

$ - Dollars 

$/yr – Dollars per year 

6.7 Storage Vessels 

For storage vessels, the option of requiring area sources to comply with the existing 

major source requirements was analyzed. No storage vessels meeting the subpart Kb criteria 

were identified at existing area sources. However, the theoretical analysis of a 40,000 gallon tank 

storing methanol (with a resulting cost effectiveness between $2,000 and $12,000 per ton of 

HAP reduced) described in a separate memorandum6 is applicable to area sources as well. 

Recordkeeping and reporting costs were estimated for existing area sources with a total initial 

cost of $1,102 per facility and a total annual cost of $1,554 per facility. The recordkeeping and 

reporting cost analysis is presented in Attachment I. 

31
7.0 Summary of Results 

Table 41 presents a summary of annual emissions from existing area sources and the 

costs and emission reductions of control options beyond the level of control currently available at 

existing area sources for process vents, wastewater, equipment leaks, heat exchange systems, 

other emission sources, and storage vessels. Table 42 presents a summary of annual emissions 

from existing and model new area sources and the costs and emission reductions of control 

options beyond the level of control currently available at existing and model new area sources 

for resins. Table 43 presents a summary of annual emissions for a model new area source and the 

costs and emission reductions of control options beyond the level of control currently available at 

a model new area source for process vents, wastewater, equipment leaks, heat exchange systems, 

other emission sources and storage vessels. Table 43 indicates on which existing area source 

facility each emission point was based. 

32
Table 41. Existing Source GACT Analysis Summary for Process Vents, Wastewater, Equipment Leak

Systems, Other Emission Sources and Storage Vessels 

Emission Point Control Option[1] Total Initial Cost ($) Total Annual Cost ($/yr) 

Baseline Emission and Reductions[2]

(Tons/yr) 

VC CDD/CDF (g/yr) Total Or

Process Vents 

(PVC-Only) 

Baseline (Current Performance) 5.8E-02 1.20E-04 1

Option 1 (Existing Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - Option 2[5] (Existing Major Source Emission Limits) 350,711 180,245 1.40E-02[6] 2.87E-05 2.57

Process Vents 

(PVC-Combined) 

Baseline (Current Performance) 2.79E-01 7.64E-03 4

Option 1 (Existing Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - Option 2[5] (Existing Major Source Emission Limits) 48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - 

Wastewater 

Baseline (Current Performance) 9.03E-01 - 1

Option 1[7] (Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 7,429 19,777 - - Option 2[7] (Existing Major Source Concentration Limits and Work Practices) 7,429 19,777 - - Option 3[8 (New Major Source Concentration Limits and Work Practices ) 12,370,537 2,996,390 8.55E-03 - 1

Equipment 

Leaks[9]

Baseline (Current Level of Control - Subpart F/V) 2Option 1[10] (Existing Major Source Requirements) 359,970 72,525 - - 9

Heat 

Exchangers[11]

Baseline (LDAR - 5000 ppb and monthly monitoring) 17.8 - 1Option 1 (LDAR - Major Source 50 ppb and quarterly monitoring ) 7,425 25,529 15.1 - 1

Other Emission 

Sources 

Baseline (Current Level of Control - Subpart F) 3.4E-01 - 3.4

Option 1 (Existing Major Source Requirements and Work Practices) 2,204 3,108 - - 

Storage Vessels 

Baseline (Current Level of Control - No Control) 3.4E-01 - 4.9

Option 1 (Existing Major Source Requirements) 2,204 3,108 - - 

[1] –For process vents, option 1 equals the testing and monitoring major source requirements for VC, CDD/CDF, and total organic HAP and option 2 equals the existing major source requireme

the testing and monitoring major source requirements for VC and total non-VC organic HAP, option 2 equals the existing major source major sources, and option 3 equals the new major source 

and reactor openings, option 1 equals the existing major source requirements. 

[2] – Baseline emissions are shown for the level of control currently available at existing area sources. Total Organic HAP baselines and reductions include vinyl chloride. 

[3] – Total capital cost for process vents includes initial record keeping and reporting costs (which include year 1 annual costs) and initial process vent testing.

[4] – Total annual costs for process vents include process vent testing and annual record keeping and reporting (starting in year 2).

33
[5] – Capital costs include 1)a condenser before the thermal oxidizer, 2) initial record keeping and reporting (which include year 1 annual costs), and 3) initial process vent testing. Annual costs 

condenser, 2) annual record keeping and reporting (starting in year 2) and 3) annual process vent testing. 

[6] – Vinyl chloride emission reductions are a co-result of dioxins/furans and Total Organic HAP reductions.[7] – Initial cost consists of initial uncontrolled stream testing for vinyl chloride and Total Non-VC Organic HAP in additional to initial record keeping and reporting costs. Annual cost consists 

vinyl chloride and Total Non-VC Organic HAP in the wastewater stripper outlet flow, annual testing for vinyl chloride and total Non-VC Organic HAP at the uncontrolled streams, and annual r

emission reductions are associated with the testing and monitoring cost. The testing and monitoring requirements also include development of a standard operating procedure for maintenance w

[8] – Capital costs for wastewater include hard piping of previously uncontrolled streams, a new wastewater stripper, and initial testing and monitoring in addition to initial record keeping and re

wastewater include controlling previously uncontrolled streams, annual testing and monitoring costs, and annual record keeping and reporting costs. [9] – Emissions and reductions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)/volatile hazardous air pollutants (VHAPs), and organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) categorized as Total Organic HAP

associated costs referenced from memorandum - Cindy Hancy, RTI, to Jodi Howard, EPA/OAQPS, dated December 21, 2011, subject “Analysis of Emissions Reduction Techniques for Equipm

reductions, and costs are adjusted based on equipment counts provided by CertainTeed. [10] – Capital costs for equipment leaks include capital associated with complying with Subpart UU, the cost of an electronic PRD monitoring system, and the initial record keeping and reportin

operation of the PRD monitoring system, complying with Subpart UU, and annual record keeping and reporting costs. [11] – VOCs and vinyl chloride assumed to be total organic HAP. 

[12] – Emissions reductions and costs were calculated for retrofitting subpart WW controls on model fixed roof tanks meeting Subpart Kb vapor pressure and size parameters. The results of the 

effectiveness ranged from $2,000 to $12,000 per ton of HAP reduced by this option depending on the number of turnovers assumed. Based on information submitted by PVC production facilitie

sources that meet the capacity levels storing materials that meet the vapor pressure levels were identified. Therefore, it was assumed that no storage vessels meeting capacity levels storing mater

levels would be constructed at a new source. CDD/CDF – Dioxins/Furans, toxic equivalency basis (TEQ) 

GACT – Generally Available Control Technology gr/yr – Grams per year ng/dscm – Nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, toxic equivalency basis (TEQ) ppmv – Parts per million, dry volume basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen ppmw – Parts per million by weight Tons/yr – Tons per year Total Organic HAP – Total Organic Hazardous air pollutants. Organic HAP (process vents) does not include hydrogen chloride (HCl). Total Organic HAP includes vinyl chloride, dioxins/furan

Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total organic hazardous air pollutants not including vinyl chloride

VC – Vinyl Chloride

$ - Dollars $/ton – Dollars per ton $/yr – Dollars per year 

34
Table 42. Existing and New Source GACT Analysis Summary for Resins 

Resin Type Control Option[1] Total Initial Cost ($) Total Annual Cost ($/yr) 

Baseline Emission and 

Reductions[2]

(tons/yr) 

VC Total Orga

HAP[3]

Bulk 

Baseline (Current Performance) 9.39E-01 6.51 Option 1[4] (Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 4,319 10,615 - - Option 2[4] (Existing Source Concentration Limits) 4,319 10,615 - - 

Suspension 

Baseline (Current Performance) 2.38E-01 3.57 Option 1[4] (Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 4,319 10,615 - - Option 2[4] (Existing Source Concentration Limits) 4,319 10,615 - - 

Dispersion 

Baseline (Current Performance) 1.17 1.32 Option 1[4] (Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 4,319 10,615 - - Option 2[4] (Existing Source Concentration Limits) 4,319 10,615 - - 

Suspension Blending 

Baseline (Current Performance) 3.43E-02 1.75E-01 Option 1[4] (Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 4,319 10,615 - - Option 2[4] (Existing Source Concentration Limits) 4,319 10,615 - - 

Copolymer 

Baseline (Current Performance) 7.91E-01 2.75 Option 1[4] (Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 4,319 10,615 - - Option 2[4] (Existing Source Concentration Limits) 4,319 10,615 - - 

[1] – For dispersion, suspension blending, and copolymer resins, baseline for existing area sources was determined to be the level of control of the least controlled major resin subcategory. Option 1 is equivalent to baseline with the addition of major source testing and monitoring requirements. Option 2 consists of the existing major concesubcategory. [2] – Emission reductions are presented for Option 2 where applicable. Emissions reductions are not applicable to Option 1 as there are no emission reductions associated only. [3] – Total Organic HAP baseline and reductions include vinyl chloride. [4] – $4,700 consists of the initial testing, record keeping and reporting requirements. $10,615 consists of annual testing and monitoring for Total Non-VC Organic HAP 

keeping and reporting costs. GACT – Generally Available Control Technology ppmw – Parts per million by weight Tons/yr – Tons per year Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total organic hazardous air pollutants not including vinyl 

35
chloride 

VC – Vinyl Chloride $ - Dollars $/ton – Dollars per ton $/yr – Dollars per year 

36
Table 43. New Source GACT Analysis Summary for Process Vents, Wastewater, Equipment Leaks, Heat 

Other Emission Sources and Storage Vessels 

Emission Point Control Option[1] Total Initial Cost ($) Total Annual Cost ($/yr) 

Baseline Emission and Reductions[2]

(Tons/yr) 

VC CDD/CDF (g/yr) Total Or

Process Vents 

(PVC-Only) 

Baseline (Current Performance – CertainTeed Lake Charles) 5.8E-02 1.20E-04 1

Option 1 (Existing Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - Option 2[5] (Existing Major Source Emission Limits) 350,711 180,245 1.40E-02[6] 2.87E-05 2.57

Process Vents 

(PVC-Combined) 

Baseline (Current Performance – OxyVinyls Deer Park) 2.79E-01 7.64E-03 4

Option 1 (Existing Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - Option 2[5] (Existing Major Source Emission Limits) 48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - 

Wastewater 

Baseline (Current Performance - OxyVinyls Deer Park) 6.34E-01 - 9

Option 1[7] (Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 3,715 9,888 - Option 2[7] (Existing Major Source Concentration Limits and Work Practices) 3,715 9,888 - - Option 3[8 (New Major Source Concentration Limits and Work Practices ) 8,054,327 1,988,368 1.31E-01 - 8

Equipment Leaks[9]

Baseline (Current Level of Control - Subpart F/V - OxyVinyls Deer Park) Option 1[10] (Existing Major Source Requirements) 179,985 36,263 - - 4

Heat 

Exchangers[11]

Baseline (LDAR - 5000 ppb and monthly monitoring - OxyVinyls Deer Park) 12.5 - 1Option 1 (LDAR - Major Source 50 ppb and quarterly monitoring ) 3,713 12,764 11.4 - 1

Other Emission 

Sources 

Baseline (Current Level of Control - Subpart F - Model Area Source Presented in Section 6.0) 

1.18 - 1

Option 1 (Existing Major Source Requirements and Work Practices) 6,102 3,032 6.16E-01 - 6.16

Storage Vessels 

Baseline (Current Level of Control - No Control - OxyVinyls Deer Park) 3.36E-01 - 4.92

Option 1 (Existing Major Source Requirements) 1,102 1,554 - - 

[1] –For process vents, option 1 equals the testing and monitoring major source requirements for VC, CDD/CDF, and total organic HAP and option 2 equals the existing major source requireme

the testing and monitoring major source requirements for VC and total non-VC organic HAP, option 2 equals the existing major source major sources, and option 3 equals the new major source 

and reactor openings, option 1 equals the existing major source requirements. The facility basis for emissions and costs estimates for the model area source is provided in the “Baseline” explana

[2] – Baseline emissions are shown for the level of control currently available at existing area sources. Total Organic HAP baselines and reductions include vinyl chloride. 

[3] – Total capital cost for process vents includes initial record keeping and reporting costs (which include year 1 annual costs) and initial process vent testing.

37
[4] – Total annual costs for process vents include process vent testing and annual record keeping and reporting (starting in year 2).

[5] – Capital costs include 1)a condenser before the thermal oxidizer, 2) initial record keeping and reporting (which include year 1 annual costs), and 3) initial process vent testing. Annual costs 

condenser, 2) annual record keeping and reporting (starting in year 2) and 3) annual process vent testing. 

[6] – Vinyl chloride emission reductions are a co-result of dioxins/furans and Total Organic HAP reductions.[7] – Initial cost consists of initial uncontrolled stream testing for vinyl chloride and Total Non-VC Organic HAP in additional to initial record keeping and reporting costs. Annual cost consists 

vinyl chloride and Total Non-VC Organic HAP in the wastewater stripper outlet flow, annual testing for vinyl chloride and total Non-VC Organic HAP at the uncontrolled streams, and annual r

emission reductions are associated with the testing and monitoring cost. The testing and monitoring requirements also include development of a standard operating procedure for maintenance w

[8] – Capital costs for wastewater include hard piping of previously uncontrolled streams, a new wastewater stripper, and initial testing and monitoring in addition to initial record keeping and re

wastewater include controlling previously uncontrolled streams, annual testing and monitoring costs, and annual record keeping and reporting costs. [9] – Emissions and reductions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)/volatile hazardous air pollutants (VHAPs), and organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) categorized as Total Organic HAP

associated costs referenced from memorandum - Cindy Hancy, RTI, to Jodi Howard, EPA/OAQPS, dated December 21, 2011, subject “Analysis of Emissions Reduction Techniques for Equipm

reductions, and costs are adjusted based on equipment counts provided by CertainTeed. [10] – Capital costs for equipment leaks include capital associated with complying with Subpart UU, the cost of an electronic PRD monitoring system, and the initial record keeping and reportin

operation of the PRD monitoring system, complying with Subpart UU, and annual record keeping and reporting costs. [11] – VOCs and vinyl chloride assumed to be total Organic HAP. 

[12] – Emissions reductions and costs were calculated for retrofitting subpart WW controls on model fixed roof tanks meeting Subpart Kb vapor pressure and size parameters. The results of the 

effectiveness ranged from $2,000 to $12,000 per ton of HAP reduced by this option depending on the number of turnovers assumed. Based on information submitted by PVC production facilitie

sources that meet the capacity levels storing materials that meet the vapor pressure levels were identified. Therefore, it was assumed that no storage vessels meeting capacity levels storing mater

levels would be constructed at a new source. CDD/CDF – Dioxins/Furans, toxic equivalency basis (TEQ) 

GACT – Generally Available Control Technology gr/yr – Grams per year ng/dscm – Nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, toxic equivalency basis (TEQ) ppmv – Parts per million, dry volume basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen ppmw – Parts per million by weight Tons/yr – Tons per year Total Organic HAP – Total Organic Hazardous air pollutants. Organic HAP (process vents) does not include hydrogen chloride (HCl). Total Organic HAP includes vinyl chloride, dioxins/furan

Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total organic hazardous air pollutants not including vinyl chloride

VC – Vinyl Chloride

$ - Dollars $/ton – Dollars per ton $/yr – Dollars per year 

38
8.0 References 

1. “Information Collection for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production 

Source Category.” Memorandum from Eastern Research Group, Inc. To Jodi Howard, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 2012. 

2. “Revised Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for the 

Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category.” Memorandum 

from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency. February 2012. 

3. “Data and procedure for handling below detection level data in analyzing various 

pollutant emissions database for MACT and RTR emission limits.” Memorandum from 

Peter Westlin, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, to Sector Policies and Programs 

Division Management and Technical Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 

December 13, 2011. 

4. “Revised Baseline Emission Estimates for Major Sources in the Polyvinyl Chloride and 

Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category.” Memorandum from Eastern Research 

Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 2012. 

5. “Revised Costs and Emission Reductions for Major Sources in the Polyvinyl Chloride 

and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category.” Memorandum from Eastern 

Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 

2012. 

6. “Revised Beyond-the-Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) 

Production Source Category.” Memorandum from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi 

Howard, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 2012.

39
Attachments 

Attachment A. CertainTeed Lake Charles and OxyVinyls Deer Park Operating Permits 

Attachment B. GACT Analysis for PVC-Only Process Vents 

Attachment C. GACT Analysis for PVC-Combined Process Vents 

Attachment D. GACT Analysis for Stripped Resins 

Attachment E. GACT Analysis for Process and Maintenance Wastewater 

Attachment F. GACT Analysis for Heat Exchange Systems

Attachment G. GACT Analysis for Equipment Leaks 

Attachment H. GACT Analysis for Other Emission Sources

Attachment I. Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost Estimation for Area Sources 

Attachment J. Storage Vessel Information Provided in Facility Survey 

40
Attachment A 

CertainTeed Lake Charles and OxyVinyls Deer Park Operating Permits 

41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
Attachment B 

GACT Analysis for PVC-Only Process Vents 

88
ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	






	



Calculated GACT Limits for Process Vents - PVC Only

Calculated Limits

Area Source Current Level of 

Performance (CTLC 

Averages)

Existing Source - Current Level 

of Control Calculted Limits 

(CTLC w/ Variability)

New Source Current Level of 

Performance

New Source

(Least Controlled MACT Source 

w/ Variability)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 5.24E+00 5.30E+00 5.24E+00 5.30E+00Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 3.11E-02 1.30E-01 3.11E-02 1.30E-01Total Organic HAP(ppmv) 7.37E+01 1.40E+02 7.37E+01 1.40E+02

THC (ppmvd as propane) 1.66E+01 4.53E+01 1.66E+01 4.53E+01Existing Source GACT Summary for Process Vents - PVC Only

Pollutant

Area Source Current Level of 

Performance (CTLC 

Averages)

Option 1 Limit 

(Major Source Requirement)

Baseline Emissions - Based on CTLC 

Average Concentration (TPY)

Emission Reductions as a Result 

of Complying w/ Major Source 

Reqs (TPY)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 5.24E+00 6.00E+00 5.84E-02 1.40E-02Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 3.11E-02 3.80E-02 1.32E-10 3.17E-11Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 7.37E+01 5.60E+01 1.07E+00 2.57E-01

New Source GACT Summary for Process Vents - PVC Only

Pollutant

New Area Source Current 

Level of Performance (Model 

new Source Avg. 

Concentrations)

Option 1 Limit 

(Existing Source MACT)

Baseline Emissions - Based on CTLC 

Average Concentration (TPY)

Emission Reductions as a Result 

of Complying w/ Major Source 

Reqs (TPY)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 5.24E+00 6.00E+00 5.84E-02 1.40E-02Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 3.11E-02 3.80E-02 1.32E-10 3.17E-11Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 7.37E+01 5.60E+01 1.07E+00 2.57E-01






 !"#

$%

 &'	

(



	

 


   !

(

 )*+&,-+



"
# $!"
	

 %%"
#&'

 

"
' $!"
 


 &*.-,-+

Compliance with Major Source Requirements Cost Summary

%()*+,-./0*-0	
1("
2&0*-0,
#

89
ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	

	
	

	

New and Existing GACT VC Floor (CertainTeed Lake Charles) New and Existing GACT CDD/CDF on a TEQ Basis (CertainTeed Lake Charl

Facility Run Conc (PPMV @ 3% O2) LN Conc (PPMV @ 3% O2) DL average run value DL for Max Sorting Facility Run TEQ Conc (ng/dscm @ 3% O2) LN(TEQ)

  	
 	
 	
 	
   	 	  	
 	
 	
 	
   	 	  	
 	
 	
 	
   	 	

Normal LN Normal LN

Sample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00 Sample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Non-Detects 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Average 3.11E-02 -3.56E+00Average 5.24E+00 1.66E+00 Median 2.29E-02 -3.78E+00Median 5.24E+00 1.66E+00 Standard Deviation 1.73E-02 5.15E-01Standard Deviation 1.00E-02 1.91E-03 Minimum 1.94E-02 -3.94E+00Minimum 5.23E+00 1.65E+00 Maximum 5.09E-02 -2.98E+00Maximum 5.25E+00 1.66E+00 Skewness 1.65E+00 1.53E+00Skewness 0.00E+00 -2.86E-03 SE Skewness 1.41E+00 1.41E+00

SE Skewness 1.41E+00 1.41E+00 Skewness Test Normal NormalSkewness Test Normal Normal Kurtosis

Kurtosis SE Kurtosis 2.83E+00 2.83E+00

SE Kurtosis 2.83E+00 2.83E+00 Kurtosis Test

Kurtosis Test 99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+00 6.96E+00

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+00 6.96E+00 99.0% UPL 1.29E-01 5.30E-0199.0% UPL 5.30E+00 5.30E+00

average in variability analysis 3.11E-02 ng/dscm @ 3% O2

average in variability analysis 5.24E+00 PPMVD @ 3% O2 RDL 	 ng/dscm @ 3% O2

RDL 1.84E-01 PPMVD @ 3% O2 3 x RDL 	 ng/dscm @ 3% O23 x RDL 5.52E-01 PPMVD @ 3% O2 99.0% UPL 1.29E-01 ng/dscm @ 3% O2

99.0% UPL 5.30E+00 PPMVD @ 3% O2 Area Source w/ Variability 1.30E-01 ng/dscm @ 3% O2

Area Source w/ Variability 5.30E+00 PPMVD @ 3% O2







 
!""
#

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'(
 




 

&&"
&"
' &# 
'
%) %
&"
' "'#
"*+





 
 
#
&"
,
&

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'(
 

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'








 
 
#
&"
,
&

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'






 
!""
#

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'(
 

&&"
&"
' &# 
'
%) %
&"
' "'#
"*+

90
ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	

	
	

	

New and Existing Source GACT Floor for Total Organic HAP (CertainTeed Lake Charles)

Facility Run Conc (PPMV @ 3% O2) LN Conc (PPMV @ 3% O2) DL average run value DL for Max Sorting

    	 	    	 	     	


Normal LN

Sample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Non-Detects 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Average 7.37E+01 4.29E+00Median 7.55E+01 4.32E+00Standard Deviation 1.07E+01 1.49E-01Minimum 6.22E+01 4.13E+00Maximum 8.34E+01 4.42E+00Skewness -7.36E-01 -9.07E-01SE Skewness 1.41E+00 1.41E+00

Skewness Test Normal NormalKurtosisSE Kurtosis 2.83E+00 2.83E+00Kurtosis Test99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+00 6.96E+0099.0% UPL 1.35E+02 1.71E+02

average in variability analysis 7.37E+01 ppmvd @ 3% O2RDL 1.84E-01 ppmvd @ 3% O23 x RDL 5.52E-01 ppmvd @ 3% O2

99.0% UPL 1.35E+02 ppmvd @ 3% O2Area Source w/ Variability 1.40E+02 ppmvd @ 3% O2







 
!""
#

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'(
 




 

&&"
&"
' &# 
'
%) %
&"
' "'#
"*+





 
 
#
&"
,
&

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'(
 

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'


91
ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	

	
	

	

THC - PVC Only - Existing Area Source

Company Facility Compound_Std Method Run Date Value Ln Value

CertainTeed Lake Charles THC EPA Method 25A 1 1/26/2010 15.28 2.726544784CertainTeed Lake Charles THC EPA Method 25A 2 1/26/2010 12.36 2.514465452CertainTeed Lake Charles THC EPA Method 25A 3 1/26/2010 22.19 3.099641737

Average 16.61

Normal LN

Sample Size 3 3Compliance Avg 3 3Average 16.6100 2.7802Median 15.28 2.727Standard Deviation 5.05 0.296Minimum 12.36 2.514Maximum 22.19 3.100Skewness 1.10 0.79SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal NormalKurtosis * *SE Kurtosis 2.83 2.83Kurtosis Test * *99.0% t-statistic for UL 4.54 4.5499.0% UL 39.53 61.89599.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.9699.0% UPL 45.32 86.912RDL 0.85 PPMVD @ 3% O23x RDL 2.535 PPMVD @ 3% O299.0% UL 39.5 PPMVD @ 3% O299.0% UPL 45.3 PPMVD @ 3% O2* Cannot perform Kurtosis test.

THC Variability Analysis - PVC ONLY (Existing)

ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2

Units

92
ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	


		
		
	

Major Source Requirements (Existing PVC Only MACT Floor)	
 
  	
  	
 
  !" 	
 # 

Outlet Max Flow Rate

(DSCMM)

Average O2

(%)

Avg. 

Temp

(C)

Vinyl Chloride

(ppmvd @ 3%O2)

HCl

(ppmvd @ 3%O2)

CDD/CDF

(ng/dscm @ 

3%O2)

TotalHAP

(ppmvd @ 

3%O2)

Inlet Max Flow 

Rate (DSCMM)

Average O2

(%)

Avg. Temp

(C)

Vinyl 

Chloride

(ppmvd @ 

3%O2)

CE Redux 

Effy

Vinyl 

Chloride 

(lbs/hr)

VC 

$ %

&' ()

HCl 

$ %

&' ()

CDD/CDF 

$ %

&' ()

TOHAP 

$ %

&' ()

VC$ %

&!	 *)

HCl 

$ %

&!	 *)

CDD/CDF 

(TEQ) 

$ %

&!	 *)

TOHAP 

$ %

&!	 *)

VC - 

+
,-	

.- 	


/%%-

 HCl0

+
,-	

.-	


/%%-

CDD/CDF0

+
,-	

.-	


/%%-

T

-%!/1( 	
 
2345 5
6345 #
75345 #
234 
5530 7
7345 #
#34 
30 
27345 6
#6342 5
34 
34 5
630 
34 
523055 
##305 #
230 
34 5
305 5
734 

Facility Classification

Outlet Conditions Inlet Conditions 

Baseline Emissions Estimates "-+
-%	 9-	.-

93
ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Refrigerated Condenser Package for PVC-Only Process Vents

Certain Teed Lake Charles

PVC-Only

-- Inlet stream flowrate (DSCMM): 

-- Inlet stream flowrate (scfm): (Qin) =DSCMM/35.31 2.00E+02

-- Inlet stream temperature (oC): 	

-- Inlet stream temperature (oF): (Tin) =oC*1.8+32 1.48E+02

-- VOC to be condensed: Vinyl chloride

-- VOC inlet volume fraction:(Yvoc,in) =ppm/1E6 



-- Required VOC removal (fraction): (n) 	

-- Antoine equation constants for VOC: [4]

A: 6.50E+00

B: 7.83E+02

C: 2.30E+02

-- VOC heat of condensation (BTU/lb-mole): (Hvoc,r) 1.01E+04

-- VOC heat capacity (BTU/lb-mole-oF): (Cp,voc) 1.17E+01

-- Coolant specific heat (BTU/lb-oF): Cp,cool 6.50E-01

-- VOC boiling point (oF): (Tboil) 6.53E+00

-- VOC critical temperature (oR): (Tc) 7.73E+02

-- VOC molecular weight (lb/lb-mole): (MWvoc) 6.25E+01

-- VOC condensate density (lb/gal): 8.15E+00

-- Air heat capacity (BTU/lb-mole-oF): (Cp,air) 6.95E+00

DESIGN PARAMETERS:

-- Outlet VOC partial pressure (mm Hg): (Pvoc) =760*(Yvoc,in*(1-n)/(1-Yvoc,in*n)) 5.67E+01

-- Condensation temperature, Tc (oF): (Tcon) =(B/(A-log10(Pvoc))-C)*1.8+32 -8.48E+01

(oR): =Tcon+460 3.75E+02

-- VOC flowrate in (lb-moles/hr): (Mvoc,in) =Qin*Yvoc,in*60/392 2.93E+00

-- VOC flowrate out (lb-moles/hr): (Mvoc,out) =Mvoc,in*(1-n) 2.23E+00

-- VOC condensed (lb-moles/hr): (Mvoc,con) =Mvoc,in-Mvoc,out 7.03E-01

 (lb/hr): (Lb/hrvoc,con) =Mwvoc*Mvoc,con 4.40E+01

-- VOC heat of condensation @ Tc (BTU/lb-mole): (Hvoc) =(Hvoc,r)*[(1-Tcon/Tc)/(1-Tboil/Tc)]^0.38 1.11E+04

-- Enthalpy change, condensed VOC (BTU/hr): (Hcon) =Mvoc,con[Hvoc+Cp,voc(Tin-Tcon) 9.74E+03

-- Enthalpy change, uncondensed VOC (BTU/hr):(Huncon) =Mvoc,out*Cp,voc*(Tin-Tcon) 6.05E+03

-- Enthalpy change, air (BTU/hr): (Hnoncon) =Cp,air*(Tin-Tcon)*(Qin*60/392-Mvoc,in) 4.48E+04

-- Condenser heat load (BTU/hr): (Hload) =Hcon+huncon+Hnoncon 6.06E+04

-- Heat transfer coefficient, U (BTU/hr-ft2-oF): Estimate from OAQPS Manual 2.00E+01

-- Log-mean temperature difference (oF): Tlm =(Tin-Tcon-25)/ln((Tin-Tcon-10)/15) 7.71E+01

-- Condenser surface area (ft2): (Acon) =Hload/U*Tlm 3.93E+01

-- Coolant flowrate (lb/hr): =Hload/(Cp,cool*(Tcon-15+25)-(Tcon-15)) 3.73E+03

-- Refrigeration capacity (tons): (R) =Hload/1200 5.05E+00

-- Electricity requirement (kW/ton) [6]: (kW) =-9E-06(Tcon)^3 - 0.0004(Tcon)2 - 0.0331(Tcon) + 3.560 8.97E+00

CAPITAL COSTS

Equipment Costs ($):

-- Refrigeration unit/single-stage (< 10 tons): (Rss<10) =exp(9.83-0.014Tcon+0.340lnR) 1.06E+05

-- Refrigeration unit/single-stage (> 10 tons): (Rss>10) =exp(9.26-0.007Tcon+0.627lnR) 0.00E+00

-- Multistage refrigeration unit: (Mru) exp(9.73-0.012Tcon+0.584lnR) 1.20E+05

Total equipment cost ($)--base: (ECp) =1.25*MAX(Rss<10,Rss>10,Mru) 1.50E+05

Cost Index

a. 2010 CE Equip (Feb Final) CE Equipment index (Feb 2010 Final) 6.41E+02

b. 1990 CE Equip (Oct Final) CE Equipment index (Oct 1990 Final) 3.94E+02

 ' ' ' ' --escalated: (ECpe) =(ECp)*(FebFinal/OctFinal) 2.44E+05

Purchased Equipment Cost ($): (PECp) =ECpe*1.08 2.63E+05

Total Capital Investment ($): (TCI) =PECp*1.15 3.03E+05

 INPUT PARAMETERS: Equation

94
ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Refrigerated Condenser Package for PVC-Only Process Vents

ANNUAL COST INPUTS:

Operating factor (hr/yr): (OF) 8.40E+03

Operating labor rate ($/hr): (LR) 3.46E+01

Maintenance labor rate ($/hr): (MR) 3.81E+01

Operating labor factor (hr/sh): (OLF) 1/2 hour per 8 hour shift 5.00E-01

Maintenance labor factor (hr/sh): (MLF) 1/2 hour per 8 hour shift 5.00E-01

Electricity price ($/kWhr): (EP) 7.00E-02

Recovered VOC value ($/lb)[5]: (Rvoc) 0.00E+00

Annual interest rate (fraction): (Int) 7.00E-02

Control system life (years): (EL) 2.00E+01

Capital recovery factor: (CRF) =Int*(1+Int)^EL/((1+Int)^EL-1) 9.44E-02

Taxes, insurance, admin. factor: (TaxF) 4.00E-02

 ANNUAL COSTS:

 Item Cost ($/yr)

Operating labor =OF/8*OLF*LR 1.82E+04

Supervisory labor =.15*Operating Labor 2.72E+03

Maintenance labor =OF/8*MLF*MR 2.00E+04

Maintenance materials 100% of maintenance labor 2.00E+04

Electricity =EP*OF*kW*R/0.85 3.13E+04

Overhead =.60*(Operating Labor+Supervisory Labor+Maint Labor+Maint Materials) 3.65E+04

Taxes, insurance, administrative =TaxF*TCI 1.21E+04

Capital recovery =CRF*TCI 2.86E+04

Total Annual Cost (without credits) (TACwoc) =sum of all annual costs 1.69E+05

Recovery credits (RC) =-Rvoc*OF*Lb/hrvoc,con 0.00E+00

Total Annual Cost (with credits) =TACwoc+RC 1.69E+05






	 !"# $% 	



&" ' (')! *$ *+ ()$ ","- !" '. 


*"$*%-/"

)0)1#223332+2#"2
2+'"#" $2 (#"1. 1	4*+(5
265&	&2".7

-"'"!.!.$."*%-0 "0/"&	0# 

 (".   !8. 1""'1/'9
")$ '!""'$

:(

95
ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Process Vents Emission Testing Costs

Parameters/Costs Equation Values Testing Freq.* Annual Cost of Test Annualized 

T

A. Parameters

1. CE Plant Cost index  a. 2010 (Feb 10 Final CE Index) 539.1

b. 2009 (Annual CE Index) 521.9

 c. 1992 (Annual CE Index) 358.2

B. Testing Costs, $

1. Method 1 or 1A Included as part of M 23 - $  

2. Method 26 (HCl) = $5,000 x (539.1/358.2) 3. Method 23 (CDD/CDF) = $21,000 x (539.1/358.2) - $5,000 $27,000   4. Method 25A (THC) =$6,000x(539.1/521.9) $6,198  	 5. Method 18 (Assumed cost equal to 0031) $10,000  	 

C. CRF (20 yr, 7%): (0.07*(1+0.07)^20)/((1+0.07)^20-1) 0.09439D. Facility Totals

1.TOH, &VC 

2. CDD/CDF 3. Facility Total $ 43,197.74 

* Number of Years Between Tests

Note:

3. E-mail from Jason Dewees, EPA, to Mary Johnson, EPA. August 20, 2008. Re: Monitoring Options for SNCR & Test Cost Questions.4. Conversation with Ray Merrill, ERG - 11/5/2010.5. Email from Peter Westlin, EPA 4/8/2011 to ERG: Method 18 Costs1. Initial testing costs to be annualized over 20 years at 7% interest.2. Testing costs have been rounded to the nearest $1,000 to be consistent with level of rounding in original costs; costs also adjusted based on additional information from EPA.Sources:1. Memorandum from R. Segall, EPA/EMB, to R. Copland, EPA/SDB. October 14, 1992. Medical Waste Incinerator Study: Emission Measurement and Continuous Monitoring. (II-B-89)2. E-mail from Jason Dewees, EPA, to Peter Westlin, EPA. August 20, 2008. Monitoring Options for SNCR & Test Cost Questions.

96
Attachment C 

GACT Analysis for PVC-Combined Process Vents 

97
ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	


Calculated GACT Limits for Process Vents - PVC Combined

Calculated Limits

Area Source Current 

Level of Performance 

(OVDP Averages)

Existing Source - 

Current Level of 

Control Calculted 

Limits (OVDP w/ 

New Source Current 

Level of Performance

New Source

Current Level of Control

Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 1.93E-01 5.60E-01 1.93E-01 5.60E-01

Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 7.60E-02 1.53E-02 7.60E-02

Total Organic HAP (ppmv) - Based on WLG since OVDP 

did not test for TOHAP 2nd round 114)

4.02E+00 2.90E+01 4.02E+00 2.90E+01

THC (ppmvd as propane) 1.10E-01 2.30E+00 1.10E-01 2.30E+00

Existing Source GACT Summary for Process Vents - PVC Combined

Pollutant

Area Source Current 

Level of Performance 

(OVDP Averages)

Option 1 Limit 

(Major Source 

Requirements)

Baseline Emissions - 

Based on OVDP 

Average Concentrations 

(TPY)

Emission Reductions as a 

Result of Complying w/ 

Major Source 

Requirements (TPY)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 1.93E-01 1.10E+00 2.79E-01 -

Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 5.10E-02 8.42E-09 -

Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 4.02E+00 9.80E+00 4.61E+00 -

New Source GACT Summary for Process Vents - PVC Combined

Pollutant

New Area Source 

Current Level of 

Performance (Model 

new Source Avg. 

Concentrations)

Option 1 Limit 

(Major Source 

Requirements)

Baseline Emissions - 

Based on Model New 

Source Average 

Concentrations (TPY)

Emission Reductions as a 

Result of Complying w/ 

Major Source 

Requirements (TPY)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 1.93E-01 1.10E+00 2.79E-01 -

Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 5.10E-02 8.42E-09 -

Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 4.02E+00 9.80E+00 4.61E+00 -

	

	
	 !"#$


	



		 !

"# %&'()*%


+	
 %&,-)*'


	

 

		


	.
		 !

	 !

	.
/		
(

!

		
 0&-%)*'

	
+	
 (&(1)*'


		
 

MACT Floor Cost Summary

 !2	

		$	
344	

(!	5/	44	
	

98
ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	

	
	


	

	
		
	

Facility Run Conc (PPMV @ 3% O2) LN Conc (PPMV @ 3% O2) DL average run value DL for Max Sorting Facility Run TEQ Conc (ng/dscm @ 3% O2) LN(TE

  	

 

 



 	

   
 

  	

 

 



 	

   

  
 	

 

 



 	

  
 	

 

Normal LN Normal LN

Sample Size 3.00 3.00 Sample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Non-Detects 3.00 3.00 Average 1.53E-02 -4.33E+00Average 1.93E-01 -1.65 Median 1.07E-02 -4.54E+00Median 1.93E-01 -1.65 Standard Deviation 1.06E-02 6.50E-01Standard Deviation 3.40E-17 0 Minimum 7.89E-03 -4.84E+00Minimum 1.93E-01 -1.65 Maximum 2.74E-02 -3.60E+00Maximum 1.93E-01 -1.65 Skewness 1.60E+00 1.32E+00Skewness SE Skewness 1.41E+00 1.41E+00SE Skewness 1.41 1.41 Skewness Test Normal NormalSkewness Test Normal Normal KurtosisKurtosis SE Kurtosis 2.83E+00 2.83E+00SE Kurtosis 2.83 2.83 Kurtosis Test Normal NormalKurtosis Test Normal Normal 99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+00 6.96E+0099.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL 7.55E-02 5.34E-0199.0% UPL 1.93E-01 1.93E-01

average in variability analysis 1.53E-02

average in variability analysis 1.93E-01 3x RDL 3.35E-02RDL 1.84E-01 99.0% UPL 7.55E-023 x RDL 5.52E-01 New Source GACT Limit 7.60E-02 ng/dscm @ 3% O2

99.0% UPL 1.93E-01New Source GACT Limit 5.60E-01 PPMVD @ 3% O2


 !" ""#$%&! $' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" ) !
 !"+%%#' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"
 !" $$%$%)""$#" )(,!"($%)"!%)#%- .


 !" ""#$%&! $' '! ( $$%$%)!"' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" ) !
 !"+%%#' '! ( $$%$%)""$#"
 !" $$%$%)""$#" )(,!"($%)"!%)#

	
	 !"#
	

99
ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	

	
	


	

	
	$%
	Facility Run

Conc (PPMV @ 3% 

O2)

LN Conc (PPMV @ 

3% O2)

 DL average 

run value

DL for Max 

Sorting

/0  

 
 

 

/0  	

 	

 	

 	

/0 
 	


 	
 	

 	



Normal LN

Sample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Non-Detects 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Average 4.02E+00 1.00E+00Median 1.93E+00 6.59E-01Standard Deviation 4.28E+00 1.06E+00Minimum 1.17E+00 1.58E-01Maximum 8.94E+00 2.19E+00Skewness 1.67E+00 1.31E+00SE Skewness 1.41E+00 1.41E+00Skewness Test Normal NormalKurtosisSE Kurtosis 2.83E+00 2.83E+00Kurtosis Test Normal Normal99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+00 6.96E+0099.0% UPL 2.84E+01 1.13E+03

average in variability analysis 4.02E+00RDL 1.81E+003 x RDL 5.42E+00

99.0% UPL 2.84E+01

New Source GACT Limit 2.90E+01 ppmvd @ 3% O2


 !" ""#$%&! $' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" ) !
 !"+%%#' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"
 !" $$%$%)""$#" )(,!"($%)"!%)#%- .

100
ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	

	
	


	

THC PVC Combined - Existing Area Source

Company Facility Compound_Std Method Run Date Value Ln Value

OxyVinyls Deer Park THC EPA Method 25A 1 8/31/2011 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00OxyVinyls Deer Park THC EPA Method 25A 2 8/31/2011 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00OxyVinyls Deer Park THC EPA Method 25A 3 8/31/2011 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00

Average 1.10E-01

Note: All Values Reported as ND

Normal LN

Sample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Compliance Avg 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Average 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00Median 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00Standard Deviation 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Minimum 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00Maximum 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00SkewnessSE Skewness 1.41E+00 1.41E+00

Skewness TestKurtosisSE Kurtosis 2.83E+00 2.83E+00Kurtosis Test99.0% t-statistic for UL 4.54E+00 4.54E+0099.0% UL 1.10E-01 1.10E-0199.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+00 6.96E+0099.0% UPL 1.10E-01 1.10E-01

average in variability analysis 1.10E-01RDL 7.58E-013x RDL 2.27E+00

99.0% UPL 1.10E-01

Existing Source Level of Control 2.30E+00 ppmvd @ 3% O2

* Cannot perform Skewness or Kurtosis test.


 !" ""#$%&! $' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" ) !
 !"+%%#' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"
 !" $$%$%)""$#" )(,!"($%)"!%)#%- .

THC Variability Analysis - PVC Combined (Existing)

ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2Units

101
ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	

	
	
	
		
	

Major Source Requirements (Existing PVC Combined MACT Floor)

	
 
 

 	
 

 	
 
  

!" 	
 #
$ 

Total 

Reductions

Outlet Max Flow 

Rate

(DSCMM)

Average O2

(%)

Avg. 

Temp

(C)

Vinyl Chloride

(ppmvd @ 3%O2)

HCl

(ppmvd @ 3%O2)

CDD/CDF

(ng/dscm @ 

3%O2)

TotalHAP

(ppmvd @ 

3%O2)

Inlet Max 

Flow Rate 

(DSCMM)

Average O2

(%)

Avg. Temp

(C)

Vinyl 

Chloride

(ppmvd @ 

3%O2)

CE Redux Effy

Vinyl 

Chloride 

(lbs/hr)

VC 

% &

'( )*

HCl 

% &

'( )*

CDD/CDF 

% &

'( )*

TOHAP 

% &

'( )*

VC 

% &

'!	 +*

HCl 

% &

'!	 +*

CDD/CDF 

(TEQ) 

% &

'!	 +*

TOHAP 

% &

'!	 +*

VC - 

,
-.	

/.

	
0&&.

 HCl1

,
-.	

/.

	
0&&.

CDD/CDF1

,
-.	

/.

	
0&&.

TOHAP - 

,
-.	

/.	


0&&.

VC HCl CDD/CDF TOHAP Tons/yr

" 	
 
23 4
523 
23 
#21 
21 4
23 
23 
423 
$#23 
#234 
23 
623 6
6421 
21# 
23 
5#21 $
421# 4
623 
23 
23 
23 
23 
23


23 7'*

	8"	(&&&.& 

2 .&.(7
.&8.		8!"'!"+*
..	9,.


.
 &:.8	9; 2;	..&	 .&. 

Average of All Facilities

2 .&.(7
.&,
.&	28878	8	"8&.& 7&.		
..	..&	

% 	.	':.	9,.
..	9,.*	8"	(&&&.& 

Facility Classification

Outlet Conditions Inlet Conditions Reductions (Tons/yr) Baseline Emissions Estimates ".,
.&	 <.	/.		 

102
ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	





		

		
	

		

		
 	
!"#$	$

%&
	$'	$()((*+

,

 -.		/	
 $'	$()((*
 
	
		+

 

 ! !"#"" $ %!#""

&'())* (+012304

+	,- *+052300

+	. 1+10230(

/0
1


"# #
 +' $ 
	.
6478/ 29.%$	/ 29.:%!	/

(84*)5;<"$	
=	
 *+0>2308 ;+4;2<0> (+;>2<0; 5+>42<0;

(84*)5;<"$	
=<<?
 *+812308 ;+552<(0 8+012<0> ;+)(2<0>

(84*5;><"$	
=	
 4+(;2308 8+082<0> 4+1*2<0> (+*>2<0;

(84*5;<"?$	
=	
 4+512308 4+852<0> )+5*2<0> 8+;42<0;

(84*5;<"?$	
=<<?
 4+>(2308 8+;12<(0 )+(42<(0 8+1;2<0>

(84)5;<"?$	
=	
 4+512308 8+402<0> *+5*2<0> (+>>2<0;

(84)5;<"?$	
=<<?
 4+>(2308 8+(52<(0 *+))2<(0 (+>)2<0>

(845;><"?$	
=	
 4+512308 5+402<(0 (+1(2<0> )+482<0>

(845;><"?$	
=<<?
 4+>(2308 8+852<(0 *+;>2<(0 8+012<0>

(845;<
$	
=	
 4+*02308 (+*)2<0> 8+542<0> (+(12<0;

(845;<
$	
=<<?
 4+1)2308 (+502<(0 4+482<(0 (+*02<0>

844@**@11@<"$	$
!.,(;>/ 4+>12308 (+0;2<0> 8+4)2<0> >+;>2<0>

844@**@1<"?$	$
!.,(1)/ 4+)(2308 (+>;2<0> 4+>42<0> (+)12<0;

844@**@1@<"?$	$
!.,(15/ 4+)(2308 8+812<0> *+*)2<0> (+;52<0;

844@**@<
$	$
!.,(01/ 4+8)2308 8+;(2<0> 1+0*2<0> 8+(82<0;

84@**@11@<"?$	$
!.,()5/ 4+)(2308 8+0)2<0> *+(02<0> (+582<0;

84**@1<
$	$
!.,((*/ 4+8)2308 4+(12<0> 1+))2<0> 8+4;2<0;

84@**@1<
$	$
!.,((;/ 4+8)2308 (+0)2<0; (+>(2<0; ;+042<0;

84*)5;<"?$	
=	
 4+512308 (+412<0> 8+5>2<0> (+(52<0;

84*5;<
$	
=	
 4+*02308 (+;82<0> 4+*(2<0> (+*42<0;

845;<:	$	
=	
 4+0)2308 1+8>2<(0 ;+>02<(0 4+5*2<0>

845;<:	$	
=<<?
 4+882308 (+>82<(0 4+*02<(0 (+*42<0>

8<'$!
$$
 (+*82308 (+0)2<01 ;+4(2<0) 4+*>2<01

44@**@11@<"?$	$
!.,()>/ 4+)(2308 8+4)2<0> *+)>2<0> (+>52<0;

44@**@1<
$	$
!.,(8)/ 4+8)2308 4+*(2<0> )+(82<0> 8+152<0;

44@**@<:	$	$
!.,55/ 8+>82308 1+(*2<0> ;+812<0> 4+*52<0;

#$! *+*(230( 4+412300 ;+(82<0( 4+*(2300

,
=AB!	
 8+182308 ;+*02<05 (+(52<0) *+>02<0)

,
=A $B	!
 8+5)2308 5+)52<05 (+(52<0) *+>02<0)

2$!$	 )+*1230( )+*82<0* 8+8;2<0* >+1)2<0*

2$!
$	 >+>0230( 1+5)2<08 4+(*2<08 (+482<0(

&	
$
 8+082308 (+012<0) (+(52<0) *+>02<0)

&	$! 4+00230( 8+;>2<0( *+552<08 8+002<0(

'$
 4+80230( 8+;>2<0( 1+0>2<08 8+(*2<0(

'$!$	 1+01230( (+(82<08 4+((2<04 (+4(2<08

'$!
$	 ;+*>230( 1+542<04 8+);2<04 (+(82<08

$$
 (+8;2308 8+4>2<01 (+)>2<01 5+0;2<01

$	
=	
 *+**2308 5+>42<0> (+>*2<0; ;+(42<0;

$	
=<<?
 *+)02308 8+5(2<0> )+;12<0> 8+;;2<0;

	!
 8+182308 ;+*02<05 (+(52<0) *+>02<0)

$

$	
 (+5;2308 (+0*2<01 (+082<01 *+852<01

$
 >+*(230( 8+;>2<0( (+*>2<0( )+8;2<0(

!	
 8+082308 (+012<0) (+(52<0) *+>02<0)

:
 >+8(230( )+502<0* 4+*02<0* (+*42<04


!$	 )+81230( 5+4(2<0* 8+1(2<0* (+0)2<04






103
ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Process Vents Emission Testing CostsParameters/Costs Equation Values Testing Freq.* Annual Cost of Test Annual Co

A. Parameters

1. CE Plant Cost index  a. 2010 (Feb 10 Final CE Index) 539.1

b. 2009 (Annual CE Index) 521.9

 c. 1992 (Annual CE Index) 358.2

B. Testing Costs, $

1. Method 1 or 1A Included as part of M 23 - $   

2. Method 26 (HCl) = $5,000 x (539.1/358.2)  3. Method 23 (CDD/CDF) = $21,000 x (539.1/358.2) - $5,000 $27,000    4. Method 25A (THC) =$6,000x(539.1/521.9) $6,198   	 5. Method 18 (Assumed cost equal to 0031) $10,000   	 

C. CRF (20 yr, 7%): (0.07*(1+0.07)^20)/((1+0.07)^20-1) 0.09439D. Facility Totals

1.TOH, &VC 

2. CDD/CDF 

3. Facility Total $ 43,197.74 

* Number of Years Between Tests

Note:3. E-mail from Jason Dewees, EPA, to Mary Johnson, EPA. August 20, 2008. Re: Monitoring Options for SNCR & Test Cost Questions.4. Conversation with Ray Merrill, ERG - 11/5/2010.5. Email from Peter Westlin, EPA 4/8/2011 to ERG: Method 18 Costs1. Initial testing costs to be annualized over 20 years at 7% interest.2. Testing costs have been rounded to the nearest $1,000 to be consistent with level of rounding in original costs; costs also adjusted based on additional information from EPA.Sources:1. Memorandum from R. Segall, EPA/EMB, to R. Copland, EPA/SDB. October 14, 1992. Medical Waste Incinerator Study: Emission Measurement and Continuous Monitoring. 

(II-B-89)2. E-mail from Jason Dewees, EPA, to Peter Westlin, EPA. August 20, 2008. Monitoring Options for SNCR & Test Cost Questions.

104
Attachment D 

GACT Analysis for Stripped Resins 

105
	






		




 

5.51E+08 

4.38E+06 


		
 !! 

 !
"#$#%&	#&#

Resin Type Pollutant

Area Source Current 

Level of Performance 

(Avg. Concentrations)

Area Source Current 

Level of Performance 

(With Variability)

(ppmw)

Option 1 Concentration 

(Existing Source 

Requirements)

(ppmw)

Current Level of 

Performance 

Emissions 

(Tons/yr)

Existing Source 

Requirements 

Emissions (Tons/yr)

Emissions 

Reduction for 

Option 1 (Tons/yr)

 '( '( '( () () (

&# !
* "( '( '( +(+' +(+' (

 (," -"( -'( () ( (

&# !
* ( -"( "'( -(-) ,)(") (

 +--(+ +( -( (' (,+ (

&# !
* "'(" -( )( (+ (+- (

 +("" )( )( (- (- (

&# !
* ")(" +( +( () ( (

 -"()) '( '( (' ('- (

&# !
* ,('' ( ( (+ )(" (

 &.
/	*.&&.% !& .0&1#!&1..#&% !& .0 %.2&1..3 .2!.45.6&!7( !8 %.2&1..3 .!.45.6&!7(

 &1.%#&.7 .5.#&% !& .0 %.(

&#*	$( (-)9 *

&#*: (-9 *

&#** (),9 *


"##
$$
%&	

Cost Component Bulk Suspension Dispersion Suspension Blending Copolymer

'
"

 !& ;$.!&#$&# & (9 (9 (9 (9 (9


!&#.!.&!7 (,9- (,9- (,9- (,9- (,9-


!&#.% 0<..$!7#!0.$ &!7 & (+9- (+9- (+9- (+9- (+9-


"'
" 
()( 
()( 
()( 
()( 
()(


"

!!#=.0#$&# & (9 (9 (9 (9 (9

!!# !& ;$.!& & (9 (9 (9 (9 (9

!!#=.0
!&#.&!7#!0 !& !7 & (9 (9 (9 (9 (9

!!#.&!7#!0 !& !7 &'(9- '(9- '(9- '(9- '(9-

!!#.% 0<..$!7#!0.$ &!7 & -()9- -()9- -()9- -()9- -()9-


"
" *+
 *+
 *+
 *+
 *+




!&#.&!7 &.&1#!#!!#>&1..3 .2! # &=#& ! 3!&#&.&!7% &

$.! !:.!0!7

 $ .

.&#!..0.!* 0%& !

/	*.!* 0%& !

 0..!* 0%& !


:8

/	*
$.! !

	$. !

106
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

Resin Type Suspension Percentile: 9.99E+01

GACT Limit (ppmw) 3.52E+01 New

Average of Vinyl Chloride Concentration (ppmw)

Facility Date Total Vinyl Chloride (ppmw)

	
	
	
  

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
 


  
  


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  !  !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

   !  !

  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 
 


  
 


  !  !

107
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 ! !

  
  


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


   
  


 ! !

 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
  


  
  


   
  


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

  !  !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


   
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 

  !  !

 

108
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 

 

  

 

 
 


 
 


 

 

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  ! !

 ! !

 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 ! !

 
 


 ! !

  ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
  


 ! !

 ! !

  
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
  


  
  


 ! !

 
 


 
 


   
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
  


109
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
 


  ! !

  ! !

  ! !

  
 


  
 


   ! !

  
 


  
 


  
 


  
 


   
  


  
 


  
 


  ! !

  
 


   
 


  
 


   
  


  
 


  
 


   
  


   !  !

  
 


  
 


   
  


   
 


   
  


   
  


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


   
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


110
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


  
  


 
 


  
  


  
  


  
 


  
  


 
 


 

 

 

 
 


 

  
  


 
 


  
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


  
  


  
  


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


111
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  
  


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  ! !

  !  !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  !  !

 ! !

 ! !

  !  !

 ! !

  ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  

 

 

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


112
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 

 

  

 

 

 

 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


   !  !

  !  !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


  !  !

 
 


 

113
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 

 

  

 
 


 

 
 


 

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

  
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  !  !

  !  !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 ! !

114
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


   
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


   
  


  
  


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


   
  


 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


  
  


  
  


  
  


   !  !

  
  


  
  


 
 


 ! !

  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


  ! !

 ! !

  
  


  
  


 
 


  !  !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  ! !

 ! !

  
  


 
 


  
 


  
 


115
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

   
  


  
 


  
 


  
 


  
 


   
 


  
 


   
  


  
 


  
 


  
 


  
 


  ! !

  
 


  
 


   
 


  
 


  
 


  
 


   
  


  
 


  ! !

  
 


   
  


  
 


   
 


  ! !

  
 


  ! !

 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


   
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  !  !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


116
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


  
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  !  !

 ! !

  ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
  


 
 


 ! !

  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 

 

 
 


 
 


 

  

 

 

 

 

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


  
  


117
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


   
  


 
 


 ! !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 

 

  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


  
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 ! !

 

 ! !

  !  !

 
 


 ! !

 
 


  
  


 
 


  ! !

 

 

 

 

 
 


118
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 ! !

  
  


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  !  !

 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  ! !

 
 


  
  


 
 


 ! !

  
  


 
 


  
  


  ! !

 
 


  !  !

  
  


 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  
 


  !  !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  ! !

 
 


119
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 

 

 

 

 

 
 


 ! !

 ! !

  ! !

 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


  !  !

 ! !

  ! !

 
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
 


 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

120
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


   
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


  
  


 ! !

  
 


  
 


  
 


  
 


   
  


  ! !

   !  !

   
 


  ! !

  
 


  

  

  

  
 


   
  


   !  !

  ! !

   ! !

  ! !

  ! !

   
  


  ! !

  ! !

  ! !

  ! !

  ! !

  ! !

121
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

   
 


  
 


  
 


   
  


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 ! !

 
 


  ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
  


  
  


 

 
 


 
 


 

  
  


 
 


 
 


  ! !

 
 


 
 


  !  !

 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  
  


 
 


 ! !

 
 


  
  


  
 


 
 


 
 


 

122
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  
  


 
 


  
 


 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 ! !

 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


  !  !

   !  !

 ! !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

123
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

  
  


 
 


  
  


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


  
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


 ! !

 
 


  
  


   !  !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
  


 
 


  
  


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  
 


 
 


  
  


124
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


 ! !

 ! !

  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
  


  
  


 
 


  
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 

 

  

 

 

  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


125
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
  


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 ! !

  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


   
  


  
  


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


126
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


  !  !

 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


  
 


  ! !

  
 


  
 


  
 


   
  


   
 


  
 


  
 


  
 


  ! !

  ! !

  ! !

  
 


  
 


  
 


   
 


  
 


   
  


   
  


  ! !

  ! !

  ! !

   !  !

  ! !

  ! !

   ! !

   !  !

  
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

  !  !

 ! !

 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


127
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


   
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


  
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 ! !

  
  


  
  


 
 


 ! !

 ! !

  ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 ! !

  
  


 ! !

  !  !

 ! !

  ! !

  
  


 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


  !  !

 

 
 


 ! !

  
 


 
 


  
  


 ! !

 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


128
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 


 
 


  
 


 ! !

 
 


 
 


  
  


 
 


 
 


 
 


  
  


  
  


  
 


 ! !

 ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 

 

 ! !

 
 


  ! !

 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 
 


 

 

 

  

 

 
 


 

129
	






Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

 

! "!

#$%&% ' 

()*+,-,).)!!).&!!. */ 0

!)+#/* *.!/	* 	$%&% '

&&1


). /!* 2*/  2! 3 /),). ".  //)  /

	2/)

 /

	2/) 4).*/   )5" */  //) /" 6 //)

7 /$8


.)'

98 	#   :; :;

 :<
 =:
 <:
 1:>
 >:
 :1<
 <:
 :<
 :=<
 1:1<; :>
 :1<
 1:=
 :><
 :


*/ :<
 :; =:
 <:
 1:>
 >:
 :1<
 <:
 :<
 :=<
 1:1<; :
 :1<
 1:=
 :><
 :


  :==; <:


 :<
 =:<
 1:
 1:<<
 >:1<
 :1
 1:<
 :
 :
 =:><; :1
 1:
 :<<
 :><


*/ :<
 :==; =:<
 1:
 1:<<
 >:1<
 :1
 1:<
 :
 :
 =:><; <:
 :1
 1:
 :<<
 :><


=  >:>>
 >:=<
 :<;

 :
 :<
 <:<
 1:<
 >:<
 :<
 <:
 :
 :
 =:<; :
 :<
 1:1<
 :=
 >:


=*/ :
 >:>>
 :<
 <:<
 1:<
 >:<
 :<
 <:
 :
 1:=
 =:<; :><
 :<
 1:1<
 :=
 >:


1  :>
 <:>; <:=1
 :
 :=<


 :
 :>
 1:<
 1:<<
 >:=<
 :1
 1:
 :
 :><
 =:=; :<
 :=<
 1:<
 :1<
 :<


1*/ :
 :>
 =:; 1:<
 1:<<
 >:=<
 =:=>
 >:<
 <:
 :><
 =:=; :<
 :=<
 1:<
 :1<
 :<


<  :
 <:; :>
 :>; :>
 :<
 1:1<
 :>=


 :<
 :>
 1:<
 1:<
 >:<
 :1
 1:
 :
 =:<; :
 :<
 =:<
 :
 :=<


<*/ :<
 :
 :1; 1:<
 <:=
 >:<
 :<
 :
 :=
 1:1<
 =:<; =:
 :<
 =:<
 :
 :=<


  <:1>
 1:; :<
 :1
 :
 1:<
 1:


 :
 :>
 1:>
 1:1
 >:
 :<
 <:
 :
 =:<; :
 :=
 1:<
 :
 :<<


*/ :
 <:1>
 :; 1:>
 1:1
 >:
 :1
 >:
 <:=
 1:<
 =:<; :=
 :=
 1:<
 :
 :<<


>  :1
 <:; :<=
 <:=
 <:<
 =:<


 :
 :
 1:>
 1:1
 >:<
 :1
 <:
 :
 =:<; :
 :=
 1:
 :<
 :<


>*/ :
 :1
 :; 1:>
 1:1
 >:<
 :1>
 <:
 =:=
 =:<
 =:<; :
 :=
 1:
 :<
 :<


  :>
 1:=; =:
 :=
 :
 =:>
 >:


 :
 :
 1:><
 1:1<
 >:<
 :<
 <:
 :
 :
 =:<; :=
 :=
 1:
 :<
 :<<


*/ :
 :>
 :1; 1:><
 1:1<
 >:<
 :><
 :<
 <:
 :1
 =:<; 1:1
 :=
 1:
 :<
 :<<


  :<
 1:; =:1
 :<
 =:<1
 =:
 :>;

 :1
 :
 1:1
 1:
 :<
 :=
 1:
 :
 =:<; :
 :
 =:><
 :<
 :


*/ :1
 :<
 :1; 1:1
 1:
 :<
 :=
 <:>=
 :>
 =:
 =:<; <:>
 :
 =:><
 :<
 :


  =:>; =:>
 :


 :
 :=
 :1
 1:1<
 1:<
 :>
 :=
 1:1<
 :
 :<<
 :<; :<
 =:><
 :
 :


*/ :
 :=
 :; 1:1<
 1:<
 :>
 :1
 1:1<
 :
 :<<
 :<; :
 :<
 =:><
 :
 :


  :=; :1
 <:=
 :>
 =:; :; :;

 :<
 :
 :<
 :1
 :>
 :>
 :1
 1:
 :
 :
 =:; <:<
 1:
 :
 :<


*/ :<
 :
 =:; :1
 :>
 :>
 =:
 :
 :
 :
 =:; =:; <:<
 <:
 :
 <:=


  :1; <:=; :1
 :<1
 :;

 :
 :>
 1:=
 1:
 :<<
 :<
 1:=
 :>
 :<
 =:; :<
 =:>
 :1
 <:<


*/ :
 :1; :<; 1:=
 1:
 :<<
 :<
 :>
 :
 :<
 =:; :; :<
 =:>
 :1
 <:<


=  1:=1
 <:; :
 :


 :
 :1
 1:<
 =:<
 :1<
 :<
 1:=
 :>
 :<<
 :; :<
 =:<
 :
 <:<


=*/ :
 1:=1
 :=; 1:<
 =:<
 :1<
 :<
 :>
 :>
 :<<
 :; :
 :<
 =:<
 :
 <:<


1  =:>
 1:<; :=;

 :
 :1
 1:<
 1:=<
 >:<
 :=<
 1:>
 :
 :<<
 :; :>
 :<
 =:<
 :<
 :1


1*/ :
 =:>
 :=; 1:<
 1:=<
 >:<
 :=<
 1:>
 :
 :<<
 :; >:1
 :<
 =:<
 :<
 :1


<  =:
 <:<; 1:
 :>=
 =:
 :;

 :<
 :<
 1:<
 1:=<
 >:<
 :1
 <:
 :
 :>
 =:; :<
 =:<
 :<
 :1


<*/ :<
 =:
 :; 1:<
 1:=<
 >:<
 :>
 :
 :<
 :>
 =:; :; :<
 =:<
 :<
 :1


  =:
 :>; :>1
 :=
 1:
 :>; <:


 :><
 :<
 :
 :
 :
 :1
 :>
 :
 :
 =:; :
 :
 :


*/ :><
 =:
 <:1; :
 :
 :
 :=>
 :<
 =:
 :
 =:; :>; <:
 :
 :
 :


>  <:<
 :1; 1:
 :1=
 :>
 :<1;

 :
 :<
 :><
 :><
 :><
 :<
 =:
 :
 :
 :<; :=
 :><
 :<
 :><


>*/ :
 <:<
 >:=; :><
 :><
 :><
 =:=
 :<
 :
 :
 :<; :<1; :=
 :><
 :<
 :><


  :<
 :>; :>
 :<>
 :>; :


 :<
 :>
 :<
 :<
 :<
 :1
 :
 :
 :<
 =:; :
 :
 :<
 :<


*/ :<
 :<
 <:; :<
 :<
 :<
 :
 :
 :
 :<
 =:; :>; :
 :
 :<
 :<


  <:
 :; =:
 :
 :1
 >:=
 :;

 :<
 :<
 :<
 :
 :; :
 :<
 :<
 :<


*/ :<
 <:
 :; :<
 =:
 :<
 :
 :1
 >:=
 :
 :; :; :
 :<
 :<
 :<


>  :=; :=
 :>=; <:;

 :
 >:>
 :><
 :
 :
 :
 :
 :
 :
 =:=<; :<
 :
 :
 :
 :


>*/ :
 :<; :><
 :
 :
 :
 :=
 :
 :
 :>=; =:=<; :<<; :
 :
 :
 :


  :>
 >:=
 1:<
 :<
= :1
 :; :1
 1:>
=

 :
 :
 :
 :
 :
 :
 :
 =:1<; :
 :
 :
 :
 :


*/ :
 >:=
 :
 :
 :
 :
 1:<
 :
 :<
 :1
 =:1<; :=<
 <:
 :
 :
 :


  :=>
 :<; <:>
 :
 =:
 :; :1


 >:
 :
 :
 :
 :>
 =:; :1
 :
 :


*/ :=>
 >:
 :<; :
 :
 <:>
 :
 :
 =:
 :>
 =:; :; :1
 :
 :
 :1


>  :=
 :<
 :; >:=
 =:
 :=
 :
 :=


 :>
 :>
 :>
 =:; :>
 :
 :>
 :>


>*/ :=
 :<
 :; :>
 :>
 >:=
 =:
 :>
 :=
 :
 =:; :>
 :
 :>
 :>
 :=


  :1=
 :; :1>; :
 :>
 :
 :11;

 :
 :
 :
 =:; :>
 :
 :
 :
 :


*/ :1=
 :; :1>; :
 :
 :
 :>
 :
 :
 :11; =:; :>
 :
 :
 :
 :


=  >:
 :; :<
 >:
= :=1;

 :>
 :>
 :>
 :>
 :>
 =:=; :
 :>
 :>
 :>
 :>


=*/ :>
 >:
 :; :>
 :>
 :<
 :>
 :>
 >:
= :=1; =:=; :
 :>
 :>
 :>
 :>


=  :1
 >:1
 :>=; <:<
 :
 :
 :<1; :; =:
 =:


 =:
 =:
 =:
 =:; =:
 =:


=*/ :1
 >:1
 :>=; =:
 =:
 <:<
 :
 =:
 :
 :<1; =:; :; =:
 =:
 =:
 =:


  :<
 :<; :; 1:>
 :
 :1
 :1; :=;

 :>
 :>
 :>
 :; :>
 :>
 :>
 :>


*/ :<
 :<; :; :>
 :>
 1:>
 :
 :>
 :1
 :1; :; :=; :>
 :>
 :>
 :>


130
	






Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - Total Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

Detection Limit Analysis

Facility HAP Sum Daily HAP 

Sum ln Total HAP

98 	# 1:<; Normal Lognormal

98 	# <:; n 2.70E+01 2.70E+01

98 	# :1; :1; :1; m 1.00E+00 1.00E+00

98 	# :; Average 1.21E+01 2.38E+00

98 	# 1:; Median 8.98E+00 2.19E+00

98 	# >:; >:; :>; Standard Deviation 6.25E+00 4.65E-01

98 	# :>; Minimum 6.26E+00 1.83E+00

98 	# 1:1; Maximum 2.48E+01 3.21E+00

98 	# :1; :1; :>; Skewness 1.01E+00 6.97E-01

98 	# :>; SE Skewness 4.71E-01 4.71E-01

98 	# 1:<<; Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

98 	# >:<; >:<; :; Kurtosis -5.92E-01 -1.06E+00

98 	# :<; SE Kurtosis 9.43E-01 9.43E-01

98 	# 1:; Kurtosis Test Normal Normal

98 	# :; :; :; t-statistic for UPL 2.48E+00 2.48E+00

98 	# <:; UPL 2.79E+01 3.50E+01

98 	# 1:1;

98 	# >:>; >:>; :; Average for variability analysis 1.21E+01

98 	# <:; RDL 4.75E+00

98 	# 1:; 3 x RDL 1.43E+01

98 	# >:; >:; :; UPL 3.50E+01 ppmw

98 	# :>; MACT Floor 3.50E+01 ppmw

98 	# 1:1;

98 	# >:<; >:<; :; 1) if the 3x RDL value is less than or equal to the calculated floor or emissions limit, use the calculated floor or emissions limit value for the rule making. 

98 	# :=; 2) if the 3x RDL value is greater than the calculated floor or emissions limit, use the 3x RDL value as the floor or emissions limit adjusted for measurement variability for the rule making

98 	# 1:<;

98 	# >:=; >:=; :;

98 	# 1:1;

98 	# =:;

98 	# :; :; :;

98 	# :;

98 	# 1:>;

98 	# :=; :=; :<;

98 	# >:>;

98 	# 1:>;

98 	# :; :; :;

98 	# :;

98 	# =:;

98 	# >:; >:; :>;

98 	# :<;

98 	# 1:>;

98 	# >:; >:; :;

98 	# >:>>;

98 	# 1:=;

98 	# :>; :>; :>;

98 	# :=;

98 	# =:;

98 	# :; :; :1;

98 	# :;

98 	# =:;

98 	# :=; :=; :<>;

98 	# :1;

98 	# 1:;

98 	# :; :; :1;

98 	# :<;

98 	# =:=;

98 	# :; :; :<;

98 	# :>;

98 	# 1:;

98 	# :1; :1; :;

98 	# :;

98 	# 1:;

98 	# :; :; :=;

98 	# :;

98 	# =:1;

98 	# :=; :=; =:;

98 	# :;

98 	# =:==;

98 	# :=; :=; =:;

98 	# :><;

98 	# =:<<;

98 	# :; :; =:<;

98 	# :;

98 	# =:>;

98 	# :1; :1; =:;

98 	# :;

98 	# =:;

98 	# :1; :1; =:;

98 	# :;

98 	# :>;

98 	# :; :; =:=;

131
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

GACT Worst Performer Determination GACT Limit Calculation

Resin Type Dispersion Resin Type Dispersion Percentile: 9.99E+01

GACT Limit (ppmw) 1.43E+03 New

Data Average of Vinyl Chloride Concentration (ppmw)

Facility Sum of NR

Count of Vinyl 

Chloride 

Concentration 

(ppmw)

Sum of BDL

Average of Vinyl 

Chloride 

Concentration 

(ppmw)

Rank Facility

Date Total Vinyl Chloride (ppmw)

PolyOne - Pedricktown 3.50E+02 1.46E+03 0.00E+00 1.44E+02 1 Formosa - Delaware City 1/1/2007 #DIV/0!

PolyOne - Henry 2.17E+02 1.46E+03 0.00E+00 3.81E+02 2 1/2/2007 #DIV/0!

Formosa - Delaware City 2.57E+02 1.46E+03 0.00E+00 5.34E+02 3 1/3/2007 6.70E+02 6.70E+02

Grand Total 8.24E+02 4.38E+03 0.00E+00 3.59E+02 1/4/2007 6.31E+02 6.31E+02

1/5/2007 4.87E+02 4.87E+02

1/6/2007 5.16E+02 5.16E+02

1/7/2007 6.90E+02 6.90E+02

1/8/2007 5.50E+02 5.50E+02

1/9/2007 5.69E+02 5.69E+02

1/10/2007 5.88E+02 5.88E+02

1/11/2007 4.91E+02 4.91E+02

1/12/2007 8.01E+02 8.01E+02

1/13/2007 #DIV/0!

1/14/2007 #DIV/0!

1/15/2007 #DIV/0!

1/16/2007 #DIV/0!

1/17/2007 #DIV/0!

1/18/2007 #DIV/0!

1/19/2007 #DIV/0!

1/20/2007 #DIV/0!

1/21/2007 #DIV/0!

1/22/2007 #DIV/0!

1/23/2007 #DIV/0!

1/24/2007 #DIV/0!

1/25/2007 #DIV/0!

1/26/2007 #DIV/0!

1/27/2007 #DIV/0!

1/28/2007 #DIV/0!

1/29/2007 #DIV/0!

1/30/2007 #DIV/0!

1/31/2007 #DIV/0!

2/1/2007 #DIV/0!

2/2/2007 #DIV/0!

2/3/2007 #DIV/0!

2/4/2007 5.58E+02 5.58E+02

2/5/2007 4.18E+02 4.18E+02

2/6/2007 3.93E+02 3.93E+02

2/7/2007 4.01E+02 4.01E+02

2/8/2007 3.94E+02 3.94E+02

2/9/2007 4.42E+02 4.42E+02

2/10/2007 4.03E+02 4.03E+02

2/11/2007 4.89E+02 4.89E+02

2/12/2007 4.54E+02 4.54E+02

2/13/2007 4.51E+02 4.51E+02

2/14/2007 4.20E+02 4.20E+02

2/15/2007 5.34E+02 5.34E+02

2/16/2007 5.20E+02 5.20E+02

2/17/2007 6.15E+02 6.15E+02

2/18/2007 6.73E+02 6.73E+02

2/19/2007 7.46E+02 7.46E+02

2/20/2007 7.93E+02 7.93E+02

2/21/2007 9.31E+02 9.31E+02

2/22/2007 5.16E+02 5.16E+02

2/23/2007 5.80E+02 5.80E+02

2/24/2007 5.89E+02 5.89E+02

2/25/2007 5.68E+02 5.68E+02

2/26/2007 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

2/27/2007 5.73E+02 5.73E+02

2/28/2007 5.24E+02 5.24E+02

3/1/2007 4.91E+02 4.91E+02

3/2/2007 2.84E+02 2.84E+02

3/3/2007 5.34E+02 5.34E+02

3/4/2007 6.87E+02 6.87E+02

3/5/2007 4.75E+02 4.75E+02

3/6/2007 5.85E+02 5.85E+02

3/7/2007 5.58E+02 5.58E+02

3/8/2007 6.97E+02 6.97E+02

3/9/2007 6.52E+02 6.52E+02

3/10/2007 5.22E+02 5.22E+02

3/11/2007 6.19E+02 6.19E+02

3/12/2007 6.60E+02 6.60E+02

3/13/2007 5.87E+02 5.87E+02

3/14/2007 5.60E+02 5.60E+02

3/15/2007 #DIV/0!

3/16/2007 #DIV/0!

3/17/2007 #DIV/0!

3/18/2007 #DIV/0!

3/19/2007 #DIV/0!

3/20/2007 #DIV/0!

3/21/2007 #DIV/0!

3/22/2007 #DIV/0!

3/23/2007 #DIV/0!

3/24/2007 #DIV/0!

3/25/2007 #DIV/0!

3/26/2007 #DIV/0!

3/27/2007 #DIV/0!

3/28/2007 #DIV/0!

3/29/2007 #DIV/0!

3/30/2007 #DIV/0!

3/31/2007 #DIV/0!

4/1/2007 #DIV/0!

4/2/2007 2.73E+02 2.73E+02

4/3/2007 2.32E+02 2.32E+02

4/4/2007 3.45E+02 3.45E+02

4/5/2007 3.26E+02 3.26E+02

4/6/2007 4.40E+02 4.40E+02

4/7/2007 3.37E+02 3.37E+02

4/8/2007 3.07E+02 3.07E+02

4/9/2007 3.56E+02 3.56E+02

4/10/2007 3.85E+02 3.85E+02

4/11/2007 3.28E+02 3.28E+02

4/12/2007 4.34E+02 4.34E+02

4/13/2007 3.28E+02 3.28E+02

4/14/2007 4.44E+02 4.44E+02

4/15/2007 3.82E+02 3.82E+02

4/16/2007 3.16E+02 3.16E+02

4/17/2007 4.93E+02 4.93E+02

4/18/2007 4.04E+02 4.04E+02

4/19/2007 3.41E+02 3.41E+02

4/20/2007 4.94E+02 4.94E+02

4/21/2007 4.49E+02 4.49E+02

4/22/2007 5.60E+02 5.60E+02

4/23/2007 4.25E+02 4.25E+02

4/24/2007 6.95E+02 6.95E+02

4/25/2007 4.83E+02 4.83E+02

4/26/2007 4.40E+02 4.40E+02

4/27/2007 3.50E+02 3.50E+02

4/28/2007 3.73E+02 3.73E+02

132
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

4/29/2007 4.43E+02 4.43E+02

4/30/2007 2.84E+02 2.84E+02

5/1/2007 3.21E+02 3.21E+02

5/2/2007 3.86E+02 3.86E+02

5/3/2007 4.19E+02 4.19E+02

5/4/2007 4.00E+02 4.00E+02

5/5/2007 3.98E+02 3.98E+02

5/6/2007 3.89E+02 3.89E+02

5/7/2007 4.18E+02 4.18E+02

5/8/2007 3.96E+02 3.96E+02

5/9/2007 4.38E+02 4.38E+02

5/10/2007 3.98E+02 3.98E+02

5/11/2007 3.84E+02 3.84E+02

5/12/2007 3.79E+02 3.79E+02

5/13/2007 4.30E+02 4.30E+02

5/14/2007 4.30E+02 4.30E+02

5/15/2007 4.07E+02 4.07E+02

5/16/2007 3.47E+02 3.47E+02

5/17/2007 3.26E+02 3.26E+02

5/18/2007 3.59E+02 3.59E+02

5/19/2007 3.81E+02 3.81E+02

5/20/2007 3.35E+02 3.35E+02

5/21/2007 4.79E+02 4.79E+02

5/22/2007 6.87E+02 6.87E+02

5/23/2007 3.41E+02 3.41E+02

5/24/2007 2.93E+02 2.93E+02

5/25/2007 2.10E+02 2.10E+02

5/26/2007 2.72E+02 2.72E+02

5/27/2007 2.87E+02 2.87E+02

5/28/2007 2.50E+02 2.50E+02

5/29/2007 #DIV/0!

5/30/2007 #DIV/0!

5/31/2007 #DIV/0!

6/1/2007 #DIV/0!

6/2/2007 #DIV/0!

6/3/2007 #DIV/0!

6/4/2007 #DIV/0!

6/5/2007 #DIV/0!

6/6/2007 #DIV/0!

6/7/2007 #DIV/0!

6/8/2007 #DIV/0!

6/9/2007 #DIV/0!

6/10/2007 #DIV/0!

6/11/2007 #DIV/0!

6/12/2007 #DIV/0!

6/13/2007 #DIV/0!

6/14/2007 #DIV/0!

6/15/2007 #DIV/0!

6/16/2007 #DIV/0!

6/17/2007 #DIV/0!

6/18/2007 #DIV/0!

6/19/2007 3.39E+02 3.39E+02

6/20/2007 3.48E+02 3.48E+02

6/21/2007 3.66E+02 3.66E+02

6/22/2007 3.88E+02 3.88E+02

6/23/2007 3.97E+02 3.97E+02

6/24/2007 4.89E+02 4.89E+02

6/25/2007 4.99E+02 4.99E+02

6/26/2007 4.70E+02 4.70E+02

6/27/2007 5.18E+02 5.18E+02

6/28/2007 4.91E+02 4.91E+02

6/29/2007 5.91E+02 5.91E+02

6/30/2007 3.81E+02 3.81E+02

7/1/2007 3.60E+02 3.60E+02

7/2/2007 3.46E+02 3.46E+02

7/3/2007 2.92E+02 2.92E+02

7/4/2007 3.31E+02 3.31E+02

7/5/2007 4.16E+02 4.16E+02

7/6/2007 6.00E+02 6.00E+02

7/7/2007 6.41E+02 6.41E+02

7/8/2007 4.55E+02 4.55E+02

7/9/2007 5.80E+02 5.80E+02

7/10/2007 6.36E+02 6.36E+02

7/11/2007 5.91E+02 5.91E+02

7/12/2007 4.74E+02 4.74E+02

7/13/2007 5.31E+02 5.31E+02

7/14/2007 2.11E+02 2.11E+02

7/15/2007 3.83E+02 3.83E+02

7/16/2007 5.44E+02 5.44E+02

7/17/2007 5.79E+02 5.79E+02

7/18/2007 6.95E+02 6.95E+02

7/19/2007 6.66E+02 6.66E+02

7/20/2007 6.66E+02 6.66E+02

7/21/2007 5.77E+02 5.77E+02

7/22/2007 5.84E+02 5.84E+02

7/23/2007 6.44E+02 6.44E+02

7/24/2007 6.22E+02 6.22E+02

7/25/2007 5.08E+02 5.08E+02

7/26/2007 4.94E+02 4.94E+02

7/27/2007 5.65E+02 5.65E+02

7/28/2007 7.00E+02 7.00E+02

7/29/2007 6.56E+02 6.56E+02

7/30/2007 5.81E+02 5.81E+02

7/31/2007 5.35E+02 5.35E+02

8/1/2007 5.35E+02 5.35E+02

8/2/2007 3.71E+02 3.71E+02

8/3/2007 4.03E+02 4.03E+02

8/4/2007 5.86E+02 5.86E+02

8/5/2007 5.37E+02 5.37E+02

8/6/2007 4.29E+02 4.29E+02

8/7/2007 5.58E+02 5.58E+02

8/8/2007 6.74E+02 6.74E+02

8/9/2007 #DIV/0!

8/10/2007 4.79E+02 4.79E+02

8/11/2007 #DIV/0!

8/12/2007 #DIV/0!

8/13/2007 #DIV/0!

8/14/2007 #DIV/0!

8/15/2007 #DIV/0!

8/16/2007 #DIV/0!

8/17/2007 #DIV/0!

8/18/2007 #DIV/0!

8/19/2007 #DIV/0!

8/20/2007 #DIV/0!

8/21/2007 #DIV/0!

8/22/2007 #DIV/0!

8/23/2007 #DIV/0!

8/24/2007 #DIV/0!

8/25/2007 #DIV/0!

8/26/2007 #DIV/0!

8/27/2007 #DIV/0!

8/28/2007 #DIV/0!

8/29/2007 #DIV/0!

8/30/2007 4.61E+02 4.61E+02

8/31/2007 5.92E+02 5.92E+02

9/1/2007 5.46E+02 5.46E+02

9/2/2007 3.07E+02 3.07E+02

9/3/2007 3.52E+02 3.52E+02

9/4/2007 2.76E+02 2.76E+02

9/5/2007 4.95E+02 4.95E+02

133
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

9/6/2007 2.35E+02 2.35E+02

9/7/2007 3.35E+02 3.35E+02

9/8/2007 4.45E+02 4.45E+02

9/9/2007 4.89E+02 4.89E+02

9/10/2007 4.38E+02 4.38E+02

9/11/2007 3.77E+02 3.77E+02

9/12/2007 3.55E+02 3.55E+02

9/13/2007 4.06E+02 4.06E+02

9/14/2007 3.29E+02 3.29E+02

9/15/2007 3.76E+02 3.76E+02

9/16/2007 3.99E+02 3.99E+02

9/17/2007 3.44E+02 3.44E+02

9/18/2007 3.55E+02 3.55E+02

9/19/2007 2.76E+02 2.76E+02

9/20/2007 3.48E+02 3.48E+02

9/21/2007 3.34E+02 3.34E+02

9/22/2007 3.10E+02 3.10E+02

9/23/2007 3.33E+02 3.33E+02

9/24/2007 4.26E+02 4.26E+02

9/25/2007 4.07E+02 4.07E+02

9/26/2007 3.92E+02 3.92E+02

9/27/2007 3.88E+02 3.88E+02

9/28/2007 4.43E+02 4.43E+02

9/29/2007 4.37E+02 4.37E+02

9/30/2007 3.72E+02 3.72E+02

10/1/2007 4.28E+02 4.28E+02

10/2/2007 3.90E+02 3.90E+02

10/3/2007 4.61E+02 4.61E+02

10/4/2007 2.49E+02 2.49E+02

10/5/2007 #DIV/0!

10/6/2007 #DIV/0!

10/7/2007 #DIV/0!

10/8/2007 #DIV/0!

10/9/2007 #DIV/0!

10/10/2007 #DIV/0!

10/11/2007 #DIV/0!

10/12/2007 #DIV/0!

10/13/2007 #DIV/0!

10/14/2007 #DIV/0!

10/15/2007 #DIV/0!

10/16/2007 #DIV/0!

10/17/2007 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

10/18/2007 5.52E+02 5.52E+02

10/19/2007 4.17E+02 4.17E+02

10/20/2007 4.45E+02 4.45E+02

10/21/2007 3.87E+02 3.87E+02

10/22/2007 3.68E+02 3.68E+02

10/23/2007 4.55E+02 4.55E+02

10/24/2007 3.89E+02 3.89E+02

10/25/2007 3.84E+02 3.84E+02

10/26/2007 5.16E+02 5.16E+02

10/27/2007 7.79E+02 7.79E+02

10/28/2007 4.88E+02 4.88E+02

10/29/2007 3.14E+02 3.14E+02

10/30/2007 4.30E+02 4.30E+02

10/31/2007 #DIV/0!

11/1/2007 1.00E+03 1.00E+03

11/2/2007 8.29E+02 8.29E+02

11/3/2007 #DIV/0!

11/4/2007 1.62E+01 1.62E+01

11/5/2007 6.25E+02 6.25E+02

11/6/2007 5.94E+02 5.94E+02

11/7/2007 6.12E+02 6.12E+02

11/8/2007 6.65E+02 6.65E+02

11/9/2007 8.06E+02 8.06E+02

11/10/2007 #DIV/0!

11/11/2007 #DIV/0!

11/12/2007 4.06E+02 4.06E+02

11/13/2007 3.97E+02 3.97E+02

11/14/2007 3.22E+02 3.22E+02

11/15/2007 1.73E+02 1.73E+02

11/16/2007 3.28E+02 3.28E+02

11/17/2007 #DIV/0!

11/18/2007 6.22E+02 6.22E+02

11/19/2007 5.02E+02 5.02E+02

11/20/2007 3.55E+02 3.55E+02

11/21/2007 3.69E+02 3.69E+02

11/22/2007 2.88E+02 2.88E+02

11/23/2007 1.01E+03 1.01E+03

11/24/2007 #DIV/0!

11/25/2007 #DIV/0!

11/26/2007 #DIV/0!

11/27/2007 #DIV/0!

11/28/2007 6.06E+02 6.06E+02

11/29/2007 3.87E+02 3.87E+02

11/30/2007 4.12E+02 4.12E+02

12/1/2007 4.91E+02 4.91E+02

12/2/2007 4.54E+02 4.54E+02

12/3/2007 3.83E+02 3.83E+02

12/4/2007 4.26E+02 4.26E+02

12/5/2007 4.76E+02 4.76E+02

12/6/2007 4.00E+02 4.00E+02

12/7/2007 4.44E+02 4.44E+02

12/8/2007 4.50E+02 4.50E+02

12/9/2007 4.58E+02 4.58E+02

12/10/2007 6.77E+02 6.77E+02

12/11/2007 8.58E+02 8.58E+02

12/12/2007 5.19E+02 5.19E+02

12/13/2007 7.18E+02 7.18E+02

12/14/2007 6.08E+02 6.08E+02

12/15/2007 1.07E+03 1.07E+03

12/16/2007 8.73E+02 8.73E+02

12/17/2007 6.85E+02 6.85E+02

12/18/2007 7.17E+02 7.17E+02

12/19/2007 6.52E+02 6.52E+02

12/20/2007 7.20E+02 7.20E+02

12/21/2007 8.60E+02 8.60E+02

12/22/2007 7.56E+02 7.56E+02

12/23/2007 9.16E+02 9.16E+02

12/24/2007 6.57E+02 6.57E+02

12/25/2007 5.10E+02 5.10E+02

12/26/2007 5.44E+02 5.44E+02

12/27/2007 5.74E+02 5.74E+02

12/28/2007 6.30E+02 6.30E+02

12/29/2007 6.31E+02 6.31E+02

12/30/2007 5.76E+02 5.76E+02

12/31/2007 4.75E+02 4.75E+02

1/1/2008 4.66E+02 4.66E+02

1/2/2008 5.39E+02 5.39E+02

1/3/2008 4.07E+02 4.07E+02

1/4/2008 4.36E+02 4.36E+02

1/5/2008 #DIV/0!

1/6/2008 #DIV/0!

1/7/2008 2.67E+02 2.67E+02

1/8/2008 4.57E+02 4.57E+02

1/9/2008 3.17E+02 3.17E+02

1/10/2008 2.75E+02 2.75E+02

1/11/2008 3.67E+02 3.67E+02

1/12/2008 3.23E+02 3.23E+02

1/13/2008 #DIV/0!

134
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

1/14/2008 4.08E+02 4.08E+02

1/15/2008 3.64E+02 3.64E+02

1/16/2008 5.49E+02 5.49E+02

1/17/2008 4.66E+02 4.66E+02

1/18/2008 4.56E+02 4.56E+02

1/19/2008 #DIV/0!

1/20/2008 #DIV/0!

1/21/2008 6.23E+02 6.23E+02

1/22/2008 6.88E+02 6.88E+02

1/23/2008 5.64E+02 5.64E+02

1/24/2008 6.79E+02 6.79E+02

1/25/2008 7.29E+02 7.29E+02

1/26/2008 8.28E+02 8.28E+02

1/27/2008 6.69E+02 6.69E+02

1/28/2008 5.02E+02 5.02E+02

1/29/2008 6.17E+02 6.17E+02

1/30/2008 5.88E+02 5.88E+02

1/31/2008 6.10E+02 6.10E+02

2/1/2008 6.35E+02 6.35E+02

2/2/2008 5.92E+02 5.92E+02

2/3/2008 6.51E+02 6.51E+02

2/4/2008 6.16E+02 6.16E+02

2/5/2008 4.67E+02 4.67E+02

2/6/2008 3.28E+02 3.28E+02

2/7/2008 5.55E+02 5.55E+02

2/8/2008 5.20E+02 5.20E+02

2/9/2008 6.24E+02 6.24E+02

2/10/2008 7.19E+02 7.19E+02

2/11/2008 5.05E+02 5.05E+02

2/12/2008 4.84E+02 4.84E+02

2/13/2008 3.95E+02 3.95E+02

2/14/2008 3.08E+02 3.08E+02

2/15/2008 4.00E+02 4.00E+02

2/16/2008 #DIV/0!

2/17/2008 #DIV/0!

2/18/2008 4.56E+02 4.56E+02

2/19/2008 5.54E+02 5.54E+02

2/20/2008 6.66E+02 6.66E+02

2/21/2008 4.70E+02 4.70E+02

2/22/2008 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

2/23/2008 #DIV/0!

2/24/2008 #DIV/0!

2/25/2008 6.40E+02 6.40E+02

2/26/2008 4.12E+02 4.12E+02

2/27/2008 3.97E+02 3.97E+02

2/28/2008 5.43E+02 5.43E+02

2/29/2008 4.89E+02 4.89E+02

3/1/2008 3.92E+02 3.92E+02

3/2/2008 4.22E+02 4.22E+02

3/3/2008 2.82E+02 2.82E+02

3/4/2008 4.19E+02 4.19E+02

3/5/2008 6.21E+02 6.21E+02

3/6/2008 6.22E+02 6.22E+02

3/7/2008 6.31E+02 6.31E+02

3/8/2008 4.81E+02 4.81E+02

3/9/2008 5.19E+02 5.19E+02

3/10/2008 4.71E+02 4.71E+02

3/11/2008 5.14E+02 5.14E+02

3/12/2008 3.97E+02 3.97E+02

3/13/2008 5.17E+02 5.17E+02

3/14/2008 4.34E+02 4.34E+02

3/15/2008 4.71E+02 4.71E+02

3/16/2008 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

3/17/2008 5.28E+02 5.28E+02

3/18/2008 6.81E+02 6.81E+02

3/19/2008 7.02E+02 7.02E+02

3/20/2008 6.97E+02 6.97E+02

3/21/2008 7.60E+02 7.60E+02

3/22/2008 7.71E+02 7.71E+02

3/23/2008 8.87E+02 8.87E+02

3/24/2008 7.28E+02 7.28E+02

3/25/2008 7.37E+02 7.37E+02

3/26/2008 6.82E+02 6.82E+02

3/27/2008 #DIV/0!

3/28/2008 #DIV/0!

3/29/2008 9.96E+02 9.96E+02

3/30/2008 7.82E+02 7.82E+02

3/31/2008 3.62E+02 3.62E+02

4/1/2008 3.78E+02 3.78E+02

4/2/2008 4.37E+02 4.37E+02

4/3/2008 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

4/4/2008 4.27E+02 4.27E+02

4/5/2008 3.90E+02 3.90E+02

4/6/2008 4.46E+02 4.46E+02

4/7/2008 3.75E+02 3.75E+02

4/8/2008 5.03E+02 5.03E+02

4/9/2008 8.66E+02 8.66E+02

4/10/2008 9.46E+02 9.46E+02

4/11/2008 7.41E+02 7.41E+02

4/12/2008 6.15E+02 6.15E+02

4/13/2008 7.37E+02 7.37E+02

4/14/2008 5.94E+02 5.94E+02

4/15/2008 5.38E+02 5.38E+02

4/16/2008 6.52E+02 6.52E+02

4/17/2008 4.14E+02 4.14E+02

4/18/2008 3.60E+02 3.60E+02

4/19/2008 #DIV/0!

4/20/2008 #DIV/0!

4/21/2008 #DIV/0!

4/22/2008 #DIV/0!

4/23/2008 #DIV/0!

4/24/2008 #DIV/0!

4/25/2008 #DIV/0!

4/26/2008 #DIV/0!

4/27/2008 #DIV/0!

4/28/2008 #DIV/0!

4/29/2008 #DIV/0!

4/30/2008 7.73E+02 7.73E+02

5/1/2008 7.23E+02 7.23E+02

5/2/2008 6.92E+02 6.92E+02

5/3/2008 7.42E+02 7.42E+02

5/4/2008 7.68E+02 7.68E+02

5/5/2008 6.47E+02 6.47E+02

5/6/2008 4.05E+02 4.05E+02

5/7/2008 7.62E+02 7.62E+02

5/8/2008 7.30E+02 7.30E+02

5/9/2008 6.64E+02 6.64E+02

5/10/2008 7.71E+02 7.71E+02

5/11/2008 5.91E+02 5.91E+02

5/12/2008 5.07E+02 5.07E+02

5/13/2008 5.71E+02 5.71E+02

5/14/2008 5.09E+02 5.09E+02

5/15/2008 5.52E+02 5.52E+02

5/16/2008 5.59E+02 5.59E+02

5/17/2008 5.93E+02 5.93E+02

5/18/2008 3.06E+02 3.06E+02

5/19/2008 8.33E+02 8.33E+02

5/20/2008 4.01E+02 4.01E+02

5/21/2008 3.39E+02 3.39E+02

5/22/2008 3.68E+02 3.68E+02

135
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

5/23/2008 4.30E+02 4.30E+02

5/24/2008 #DIV/0!

5/25/2008 #DIV/0!

5/26/2008 3.75E+02 3.75E+02

5/27/2008 3.89E+02 3.89E+02

5/28/2008 3.50E+02 3.50E+02

5/29/2008 4.47E+02 4.47E+02

5/30/2008 3.96E+02 3.96E+02

5/31/2008 #DIV/0!

6/1/2008 #DIV/0!

6/2/2008 #DIV/0!

6/3/2008 #DIV/0!

6/4/2008 #DIV/0!

6/5/2008 1.82E+01 1.82E+01

6/6/2008 5.61E+02 5.61E+02

6/7/2008 5.06E+02 5.06E+02

6/8/2008 5.52E+02 5.52E+02

6/9/2008 8.11E+02 8.11E+02

6/10/2008 1.02E+03 1.02E+03

6/11/2008 1.09E+03 1.09E+03

6/12/2008 6.19E+02 6.19E+02

6/13/2008 7.52E+02 7.52E+02

6/14/2008 9.06E+02 9.06E+02

6/15/2008 6.32E+02 6.32E+02

6/16/2008 7.61E+02 7.61E+02

6/17/2008 7.58E+02 7.58E+02

6/18/2008 8.51E+02 8.51E+02

6/19/2008 6.19E+02 6.19E+02

6/20/2008 8.03E+02 8.03E+02

6/21/2008 7.21E+02 7.21E+02

6/22/2008 6.46E+02 6.46E+02

6/23/2008 7.47E+02 7.47E+02

6/24/2008 6.09E+02 6.09E+02

6/25/2008 7.93E+02 7.93E+02

6/26/2008 6.82E+02 6.82E+02

6/27/2008 6.08E+02 6.08E+02

6/28/2008 3.65E+02 3.65E+02

6/29/2008 5.07E+02 5.07E+02

6/30/2008 4.21E+02 4.21E+02

7/1/2008 2.31E+02 2.31E+02

7/2/2008 4.07E+02 4.07E+02

7/3/2008 4.32E+02 4.32E+02

7/4/2008 3.79E+02 3.79E+02

7/5/2008 4.67E+02 4.67E+02

7/6/2008 5.03E+02 5.03E+02

7/7/2008 4.16E+02 4.16E+02

7/8/2008 3.80E+02 3.80E+02

7/9/2008 4.67E+02 4.67E+02

7/10/2008 8.42E+02 8.42E+02

7/11/2008 6.28E+02 6.28E+02

7/12/2008 7.31E+02 7.31E+02

7/13/2008 7.64E+02 7.64E+02

7/14/2008 7.32E+02 7.32E+02

7/15/2008 6.28E+02 6.28E+02

7/16/2008 8.64E+02 8.64E+02

7/17/2008 8.93E+02 8.93E+02

7/18/2008 4.85E+02 4.85E+02

7/19/2008 5.50E+02 5.50E+02

7/20/2008 5.40E+02 5.40E+02

7/21/2008 5.48E+02 5.48E+02

7/22/2008 4.87E+02 4.87E+02

7/23/2008 4.78E+02 4.78E+02

7/24/2008 4.60E+02 4.60E+02

7/25/2008 #DIV/0!

7/26/2008 #DIV/0!

7/27/2008 5.54E+02 5.54E+02

7/28/2008 #DIV/0!

7/29/2008 #DIV/0!

7/30/2008 #DIV/0!

7/31/2008 4.45E+02 4.45E+02

8/1/2008 5.31E+02 5.31E+02

8/2/2008 #DIV/0!

8/3/2008 #DIV/0!

8/4/2008 3.05E+02 3.05E+02

8/5/2008 5.42E+02 5.42E+02

8/6/2008 2.89E+02 2.89E+02

8/7/2008 2.52E+02 2.52E+02

8/8/2008 5.50E+02 5.50E+02

8/9/2008 #DIV/0!

8/10/2008 #DIV/0!

8/11/2008 1.13E+03 1.13E+03

8/12/2008 7.79E+02 7.79E+02

8/13/2008 9.69E+02 9.69E+02

8/14/2008 7.48E+02 7.48E+02

8/15/2008 5.47E+02 5.47E+02

8/16/2008 #DIV/0!

8/17/2008 #DIV/0!

8/18/2008 3.58E+02 3.58E+02

8/19/2008 8.47E+02 8.47E+02

8/20/2008 2.39E+02 2.39E+02

8/21/2008 3.63E+02 3.63E+02

8/22/2008 4.44E+02 4.44E+02

8/23/2008 4.68E+02 4.68E+02

8/24/2008 5.98E+02 5.98E+02

8/25/2008 4.85E+02 4.85E+02

8/26/2008 5.42E+02 5.42E+02

8/27/2008 5.20E+02 5.20E+02

8/28/2008 3.85E+02 3.85E+02

8/29/2008 3.70E+02 3.70E+02

8/30/2008 #DIV/0!

8/31/2008 #DIV/0!

9/1/2008 7.69E+02 7.69E+02

9/2/2008 6.87E+02 6.87E+02

9/3/2008 7.32E+02 7.32E+02

9/4/2008 6.27E+02 6.27E+02

9/5/2008 5.30E+02 5.30E+02

9/6/2008 5.89E+02 5.89E+02

9/7/2008 6.27E+02 6.27E+02

9/8/2008 8.40E+02 8.40E+02

9/9/2008 8.24E+02 8.24E+02

9/10/2008 8.61E+02 8.61E+02

9/11/2008 6.01E+02 6.01E+02

9/12/2008 5.59E+02 5.59E+02

9/13/2008 3.60E+02 3.60E+02

9/14/2008 4.30E+02 4.30E+02

9/15/2008 4.76E+02 4.76E+02

9/16/2008 4.47E+02 4.47E+02

9/17/2008 6.04E+02 6.04E+02

9/18/2008 8.37E+02 8.37E+02

9/19/2008 6.92E+02 6.92E+02

9/20/2008 #DIV/0!

9/21/2008 #DIV/0!

9/22/2008 1.01E+03 1.01E+03

9/23/2008 6.72E+02 6.72E+02

9/24/2008 5.03E+02 5.03E+02

9/25/2008 6.83E+02 6.83E+02

9/26/2008 6.38E+02 6.38E+02

9/27/2008 5.85E+02 5.85E+02

9/28/2008 #DIV/0!

9/29/2008 7.49E+02 7.49E+02

136
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

9/30/2008 4.62E+02 4.62E+02

10/1/2008 6.33E+02 6.33E+02

10/2/2008 6.54E+02 6.54E+02

10/3/2008 5.32E+02 5.32E+02

10/4/2008 #DIV/0!

10/5/2008 #DIV/0!

10/6/2008 6.96E+02 6.96E+02

10/7/2008 4.41E+02 4.41E+02

10/8/2008 8.49E+02 8.49E+02

10/9/2008 7.49E+02 7.49E+02

10/10/2008 7.11E+02 7.11E+02

10/11/2008 6.04E+02 6.04E+02

10/12/2008 6.69E+02 6.69E+02

10/13/2008 7.13E+02 7.13E+02

10/14/2008 6.95E+02 6.95E+02

10/15/2008 6.35E+02 6.35E+02

10/16/2008 5.22E+02 5.22E+02

10/17/2008 4.31E+02 4.31E+02

10/18/2008 5.78E+02 5.78E+02

10/19/2008 6.76E+02 6.76E+02

10/20/2008 5.70E+02 5.70E+02

10/21/2008 4.31E+02 4.31E+02

10/22/2008 7.23E+02 7.23E+02

10/23/2008 5.77E+02 5.77E+02

10/24/2008 8.78E+02 8.78E+02

10/25/2008 6.28E+02 6.28E+02

10/26/2008 8.36E+02 8.36E+02

10/27/2008 6.52E+02 6.52E+02

10/28/2008 6.97E+02 6.97E+02

10/29/2008 1.19E+03 1.19E+03

10/30/2008 8.65E+02 8.65E+02

10/31/2008 7.80E+02 7.80E+02

11/1/2008 6.54E+02 6.54E+02

11/2/2008 6.94E+02 6.94E+02

11/3/2008 9.73E+02 9.73E+02

11/4/2008 8.29E+02 8.29E+02

11/5/2008 6.58E+02 6.58E+02

11/6/2008 5.13E+02 5.13E+02

11/7/2008 5.90E+02 5.90E+02

11/8/2008 4.09E+02 4.09E+02

11/9/2008 4.81E+02 4.81E+02

11/10/2008 4.12E+02 4.12E+02

11/11/2008 4.69E+02 4.69E+02

11/12/2008 5.84E+02 5.84E+02

11/13/2008 5.20E+02 5.20E+02

11/14/2008 5.79E+02 5.79E+02

11/15/2008 6.08E+02 6.08E+02

11/16/2008 4.75E+02 4.75E+02

11/17/2008 6.53E+02 6.53E+02

11/18/2008 5.05E+02 5.05E+02

11/19/2008 #DIV/0!

11/20/2008 #DIV/0!

11/21/2008 #DIV/0!

11/22/2008 #DIV/0!

11/23/2008 #DIV/0!

11/24/2008 #DIV/0!

11/25/2008 #DIV/0!

11/26/2008 #DIV/0!

11/27/2008 #DIV/0!

11/28/2008 #DIV/0!

11/29/2008 #DIV/0!

11/30/2008 #DIV/0!

12/1/2008 #DIV/0!

12/2/2008 #DIV/0!

12/3/2008 #DIV/0!

12/4/2008 #DIV/0!

12/5/2008 #DIV/0!

12/6/2008 #DIV/0!

12/7/2008 #DIV/0!

12/8/2008 7.77E+02 7.77E+02

12/9/2008 8.10E+02 8.10E+02

12/10/2008 5.39E+02 5.39E+02

12/11/2008 4.60E+02 4.60E+02

12/12/2008 6.99E+02 6.99E+02

12/13/2008 6.05E+02 6.05E+02

12/14/2008 5.89E+02 5.89E+02

12/15/2008 5.75E+02 5.75E+02

12/16/2008 5.26E+02 5.26E+02

12/17/2008 4.17E+02 4.17E+02

12/18/2008 4.70E+02 4.70E+02

12/19/2008 #DIV/0!

12/20/2008 #DIV/0!

12/21/2008 #DIV/0!

12/22/2008 #DIV/0!

12/23/2008 #DIV/0!

12/24/2008 #DIV/0!

12/25/2008 #DIV/0!

12/26/2008 #DIV/0!

12/27/2008 #DIV/0!

12/28/2008 #DIV/0!

12/29/2008 #DIV/0!

12/30/2008 #DIV/0!

12/31/2008 #DIV/0!

1/1/2009 #DIV/0!

1/2/2009 #DIV/0!

1/3/2009 #DIV/0!

1/4/2009 #DIV/0!

1/5/2009 #DIV/0!

1/6/2009 4.25E+02 4.25E+02

1/7/2009 3.94E+02 3.94E+02

1/8/2009 4.91E+02 4.91E+02

1/9/2009 5.66E+02 5.66E+02

1/10/2009 4.09E+02 4.09E+02

1/11/2009 3.81E+02 3.81E+02

1/12/2009 2.80E+02 2.80E+02

1/13/2009 #DIV/0!

1/14/2009 #DIV/0!

1/15/2009 #DIV/0!

1/16/2009 #DIV/0!

1/17/2009 #DIV/0!

1/18/2009 #DIV/0!

1/19/2009 #DIV/0!

1/20/2009 #DIV/0!

1/21/2009 #DIV/0!

1/22/2009 #DIV/0!

1/23/2009 #DIV/0!

1/24/2009 #DIV/0!

1/25/2009 #DIV/0!

1/26/2009 #DIV/0!

1/27/2009 #DIV/0!

1/28/2009 3.57E+02 3.57E+02

1/29/2009 5.43E+02 5.43E+02

1/30/2009 6.92E+02 6.92E+02

1/31/2009 6.26E+02 6.26E+02

2/1/2009 8.94E+02 8.94E+02

2/2/2009 1.02E+03 1.02E+03

2/3/2009 7.22E+02 7.22E+02

2/4/2009 #DIV/0!

2/5/2009 #DIV/0!

2/6/2009 7.43E+02 7.43E+02

137
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

2/7/2009 8.54E+02 8.54E+02

2/8/2009 5.36E+02 5.36E+02

2/9/2009 4.76E+02 4.76E+02

2/10/2009 6.44E+02 6.44E+02

2/11/2009 4.04E+02 4.04E+02

2/12/2009 4.45E+02 4.45E+02

2/13/2009 5.79E+02 5.79E+02

2/14/2009 5.75E+02 5.75E+02

2/15/2009 #DIV/0!

2/16/2009 #DIV/0!

2/17/2009 #DIV/0!

2/18/2009 #DIV/0!

2/19/2009 #DIV/0!

2/20/2009 #DIV/0!

2/21/2009 #DIV/0!

2/22/2009 #DIV/0!

2/23/2009 #DIV/0!

2/24/2009 #DIV/0!

2/25/2009 #DIV/0!

2/26/2009 #DIV/0!

2/27/2009 #DIV/0!

2/28/2009 #DIV/0!

3/1/2009 #DIV/0!

3/2/2009 #DIV/0!

3/3/2009 #DIV/0!

3/4/2009 3.25E+02 3.25E+02

3/5/2009 3.62E+02 3.62E+02

3/6/2009 3.12E+02 3.12E+02

3/7/2009 3.98E+02 3.98E+02

3/8/2009 3.69E+02 3.69E+02

3/9/2009 3.48E+02 3.48E+02

3/10/2009 2.68E+02 2.68E+02

3/11/2009 2.90E+02 2.90E+02

3/12/2009 4.70E+02 4.70E+02

3/13/2009 3.13E+02 3.13E+02

3/14/2009 4.99E+02 4.99E+02

3/15/2009 3.99E+02 3.99E+02

3/16/2009 2.78E+02 2.78E+02

3/17/2009 3.95E+02 3.95E+02

3/18/2009 3.72E+02 3.72E+02

3/19/2009 3.54E+02 3.54E+02

3/20/2009 3.47E+02 3.47E+02

3/21/2009 6.26E+02 6.26E+02

3/22/2009 4.17E+02 4.17E+02

3/23/2009 5.32E+02 5.32E+02

3/24/2009 5.01E+02 5.01E+02

3/25/2009 #DIV/0!

3/26/2009 #DIV/0!

3/27/2009 #DIV/0!

3/28/2009 #DIV/0!

3/29/2009 #DIV/0!

3/30/2009 4.20E+02 4.20E+02

3/31/2009 6.08E+02 6.08E+02

4/1/2009 4.93E+02 4.93E+02

4/2/2009 4.14E+02 4.14E+02

4/3/2009 4.45E+02 4.45E+02

4/4/2009 4.86E+02 4.86E+02

4/5/2009 6.26E+02 6.26E+02

4/6/2009 4.82E+02 4.82E+02

4/7/2009 7.67E+02 7.67E+02

4/8/2009 7.65E+02 7.65E+02

4/9/2009 1.02E+03 1.02E+03

4/10/2009 #DIV/0!

4/11/2009 #DIV/0!

4/12/2009 #DIV/0!

4/13/2009 #DIV/0!

4/14/2009 #DIV/0!

4/15/2009 #DIV/0!

4/16/2009 #DIV/0!

4/17/2009 #DIV/0!

4/18/2009 4.80E+02 4.80E+02

4/19/2009 5.47E+02 5.47E+02

4/20/2009 5.25E+02 5.25E+02

4/21/2009 4.37E+02 4.37E+02

4/22/2009 4.79E+02 4.79E+02

4/23/2009 4.86E+02 4.86E+02

4/24/2009 3.28E+02 3.28E+02

4/25/2009 #DIV/0!

4/26/2009 #DIV/0!

4/27/2009 3.05E+02 3.05E+02

4/28/2009 1.44E+02 1.44E+02

4/29/2009 3.90E+02 3.90E+02

4/30/2009 3.87E+02 3.87E+02

5/1/2009 4.74E+02 4.74E+02

5/2/2009 4.85E+02 4.85E+02

5/3/2009 6.30E+02 6.30E+02

5/4/2009 4.03E+02 4.03E+02

5/5/2009 3.24E+02 3.24E+02

5/6/2009 3.35E+02 3.35E+02

5/7/2009 3.56E+02 3.56E+02

5/8/2009 4.84E+02 4.84E+02

5/9/2009 4.88E+02 4.88E+02

5/10/2009 4.21E+02 4.21E+02

5/11/2009 4.97E+02 4.97E+02

5/12/2009 4.79E+02 4.79E+02

5/13/2009 3.15E+02 3.15E+02

5/14/2009 3.71E+02 3.71E+02

5/15/2009 6.07E+02 6.07E+02

5/16/2009 #DIV/0!

5/17/2009 #DIV/0!

5/18/2009 2.98E+02 2.98E+02

5/19/2009 #DIV/0!

5/20/2009 #DIV/0!

5/21/2009 #DIV/0!

5/22/2009 5.55E+02 5.55E+02

5/23/2009 7.19E+02 7.19E+02

5/24/2009 5.98E+02 5.98E+02

5/25/2009 #DIV/0!

5/26/2009 #DIV/0!

5/27/2009 7.52E+02 7.52E+02

5/28/2009 8.06E+02 8.06E+02

5/29/2009 7.20E+02 7.20E+02

5/30/2009 #DIV/0!

5/31/2009 #DIV/0!

6/1/2009 5.70E+02 5.70E+02

6/2/2009 3.88E+02 3.88E+02

6/3/2009 4.18E+02 4.18E+02

6/4/2009 3.24E+02 3.24E+02

6/5/2009 3.26E+02 3.26E+02

6/6/2009 4.63E+02 4.63E+02

6/7/2009 5.40E+02 5.40E+02

6/8/2009 4.66E+02 4.66E+02

6/9/2009 4.75E+02 4.75E+02

6/10/2009 5.40E+02 5.40E+02

6/11/2009 5.21E+02 5.21E+02

6/12/2009 3.75E+02 3.75E+02

6/13/2009 5.04E+02 5.04E+02

6/14/2009 5.00E+02 5.00E+02

6/15/2009 4.17E+02 4.17E+02

6/16/2009 2.68E+02 2.68E+02

138
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

6/17/2009 4.62E+02 4.62E+02

6/18/2009 4.90E+02 4.90E+02

6/19/2009 9.48E+02 9.48E+02

6/20/2009 #DIV/0!

6/21/2009 #DIV/0!

6/22/2009 5.77E+02 5.77E+02

6/23/2009 7.49E+02 7.49E+02

6/24/2009 5.95E+02 5.95E+02

6/25/2009 6.81E+02 6.81E+02

6/26/2009 5.70E+02 5.70E+02

6/27/2009 8.12E+02 8.12E+02

6/28/2009 #DIV/0!

6/29/2009 3.60E+02 3.60E+02

6/30/2009 #DIV/0!

7/1/2009 2.07E+02 2.07E+02

7/2/2009 3.77E+02 3.77E+02

7/3/2009 #DIV/0!

7/4/2009 #DIV/0!

7/5/2009 #DIV/0!

7/6/2009 4.21E+02 4.21E+02

7/7/2009 5.31E+02 5.31E+02

7/8/2009 5.49E+02 5.49E+02

7/9/2009 6.04E+02 6.04E+02

7/10/2009 7.69E+02 7.69E+02

7/11/2009 5.41E+02 5.41E+02

7/12/2009 5.21E+02 5.21E+02

7/13/2009 3.98E+02 3.98E+02

7/14/2009 4.97E+02 4.97E+02

7/15/2009 5.66E+02 5.66E+02

7/16/2009 8.74E+02 8.74E+02

7/17/2009 4.59E+02 4.59E+02

7/18/2009 8.07E+02 8.07E+02

7/19/2009 2.56E+02 2.56E+02

7/20/2009 3.84E+02 3.84E+02

7/21/2009 3.49E+02 3.49E+02

7/22/2009 5.14E+02 5.14E+02

7/23/2009 3.25E+02 3.25E+02

7/24/2009 5.09E+02 5.09E+02

7/25/2009 3.85E+02 3.85E+02

7/26/2009 3.10E+02 3.10E+02

7/27/2009 2.52E+02 2.52E+02

7/28/2009 4.49E+02 4.49E+02

7/29/2009 4.04E+02 4.04E+02

7/30/2009 6.01E+02 6.01E+02

7/31/2009 3.48E+02 3.48E+02

8/1/2009 3.44E+02 3.44E+02

8/2/2009 6.31E+02 6.31E+02

8/3/2009 4.27E+02 4.27E+02

8/4/2009 4.39E+02 4.39E+02

8/5/2009 4.63E+02 4.63E+02

8/6/2009 3.50E+02 3.50E+02

8/7/2009 3.83E+02 3.83E+02

8/8/2009 4.38E+02 4.38E+02

8/9/2009 5.47E+02 5.47E+02

8/10/2009 6.41E+02 6.41E+02

8/11/2009 6.35E+02 6.35E+02

8/12/2009 6.90E+02 6.90E+02

8/13/2009 6.44E+02 6.44E+02

8/14/2009 5.84E+02 5.84E+02

8/15/2009 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

8/16/2009 7.17E+02 7.17E+02

8/17/2009 4.39E+02 4.39E+02

8/18/2009 4.48E+02 4.48E+02

8/19/2009 3.76E+02 3.76E+02

8/20/2009 2.79E+02 2.79E+02

8/21/2009 4.07E+02 4.07E+02

8/22/2009 4.06E+02 4.06E+02

8/23/2009 3.84E+02 3.84E+02

8/24/2009 3.57E+02 3.57E+02

8/25/2009 3.99E+02 3.99E+02

8/26/2009 4.17E+02 4.17E+02

8/27/2009 4.07E+02 4.07E+02

8/28/2009 4.18E+02 4.18E+02

8/29/2009 5.13E+02 5.13E+02

8/30/2009 6.27E+02 6.27E+02

8/31/2009 9.29E+02 9.29E+02

9/1/2009 7.20E+02 7.20E+02

9/2/2009 5.57E+02 5.57E+02

9/3/2009 6.03E+02 6.03E+02

9/4/2009 4.76E+02 4.76E+02

9/5/2009 4.99E+02 4.99E+02

9/6/2009 6.22E+02 6.22E+02

9/7/2009 8.02E+02 8.02E+02

9/8/2009 5.64E+02 5.64E+02

9/9/2009 5.53E+02 5.53E+02

9/10/2009 5.31E+02 5.31E+02

9/11/2009 6.37E+02 6.37E+02

9/12/2009 5.76E+02 5.76E+02

9/13/2009 5.98E+02 5.98E+02

9/14/2009 4.38E+02 4.38E+02

9/15/2009 5.50E+02 5.50E+02

9/16/2009 5.92E+02 5.92E+02

9/17/2009 3.55E+02 3.55E+02

9/18/2009 5.11E+02 5.11E+02

9/19/2009 3.71E+02 3.71E+02

9/20/2009 5.88E+02 5.88E+02

9/21/2009 5.73E+02 5.73E+02

9/22/2009 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

9/23/2009 3.23E+02 3.23E+02

9/24/2009 3.94E+02 3.94E+02

9/25/2009 3.60E+02 3.60E+02

9/26/2009 3.11E+02 3.11E+02

9/27/2009 4.24E+02 4.24E+02

9/28/2009 4.34E+02 4.34E+02

9/29/2009 4.73E+02 4.73E+02

9/30/2009 4.54E+02 4.54E+02

10/1/2009 5.03E+02 5.03E+02

10/2/2009 5.50E+02 5.50E+02

10/3/2009 6.22E+02 6.22E+02

10/4/2009 6.36E+02 6.36E+02

10/5/2009 5.05E+02 5.05E+02

10/6/2009 4.94E+02 4.94E+02

10/7/2009 4.90E+02 4.90E+02

10/8/2009 6.90E+02 6.90E+02

10/9/2009 4.76E+02 4.76E+02

10/10/2009 7.66E+02 7.66E+02

10/11/2009 1.36E+02 1.36E+02

10/12/2009 4.05E+02 4.05E+02

10/13/2009 5.64E+02 5.64E+02

10/14/2009 6.15E+02 6.15E+02

10/15/2009 4.01E+02 4.01E+02

10/16/2009 5.30E+02 5.30E+02

10/17/2009 6.91E+02 6.91E+02

10/18/2009 6.29E+02 6.29E+02

10/19/2009 7.84E+02 7.84E+02

10/20/2009 5.21E+02 5.21E+02

10/21/2009 4.05E+02 4.05E+02

10/22/2009 4.90E+02 4.90E+02

10/23/2009 4.65E+02 4.65E+02

10/24/2009 3.58E+02 3.58E+02

139
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

10/25/2009 6.58E+02 6.58E+02

10/26/2009 5.31E+02 5.31E+02

10/27/2009 5.32E+02 5.32E+02

10/28/2009 3.18E+02 3.18E+02

10/29/2009 8.04E+02 8.04E+02

10/30/2009 7.02E+02 7.02E+02

10/31/2009 1.99E+02 1.99E+02

11/1/2009 5.35E+02 5.35E+02

11/2/2009 5.41E+02 5.41E+02

11/3/2009 3.46E+02 3.46E+02

11/4/2009 6.33E+02 6.33E+02

11/5/2009 4.69E+02 4.69E+02

11/6/2009 4.34E+02 4.34E+02

11/7/2009 5.16E+02 5.16E+02

11/8/2009 5.86E+02 5.86E+02

11/9/2009 4.05E+02 4.05E+02

11/10/2009 4.61E+02 4.61E+02

11/11/2009 5.98E+02 5.98E+02

11/12/2009 1.03E+03 1.03E+03

11/13/2009 5.81E+02 5.81E+02

11/14/2009 4.40E+02 4.40E+02

11/15/2009 5.02E+02 5.02E+02

11/16/2009 3.74E+02 3.74E+02

11/17/2009 4.57E+02 4.57E+02

11/18/2009 4.35E+02 4.35E+02

11/19/2009 2.66E+02 2.66E+02

11/20/2009 7.69E+02 7.69E+02

11/21/2009 8.37E+02 8.37E+02

11/22/2009 1.20E+03 1.20E+03

11/23/2009 7.45E+02 7.45E+02

11/24/2009 8.53E+02 8.53E+02

11/25/2009 6.44E+02 6.44E+02

11/26/2009 1.22E+03 1.22E+03

11/27/2009 8.09E+02 8.09E+02

11/28/2009 2.21E+02 2.21E+02

11/29/2009 3.24E+02 3.24E+02

11/30/2009 3.29E+02 3.29E+02

12/1/2009 3.28E+02 3.28E+02

12/2/2009 2.28E+02 2.28E+02

12/3/2009 5.20E+02 5.20E+02

12/4/2009 5.21E+02 5.21E+02

12/5/2009 4.67E+02 4.67E+02

12/6/2009 7.20E+02 7.20E+02

12/7/2009 6.73E+02 6.73E+02

12/8/2009 5.32E+02 5.32E+02

12/9/2009 6.78E+02 6.78E+02

12/10/2009 4.21E+02 4.21E+02

12/11/2009 5.48E+02 5.48E+02

12/12/2009 4.77E+02 4.77E+02

12/13/2009 4.26E+02 4.26E+02

12/14/2009 5.38E+02 5.38E+02

12/15/2009 5.65E+02 5.65E+02

12/16/2009 4.54E+02 4.54E+02

12/17/2009 5.09E+02 5.09E+02

12/18/2009 4.00E+02 4.00E+02

12/19/2009 8.22E+02 8.22E+02

12/20/2009 6.02E+02 6.02E+02

12/21/2009 1.12E+03 1.12E+03

12/22/2009 #DIV/0!

12/23/2009 1.20E+03 1.20E+03

12/24/2009 5.31E+02 5.31E+02

12/25/2009 1.03E+03 1.03E+03

12/26/2009 1.04E+03 1.04E+03

12/27/2009 6.80E+02 6.80E+02

12/28/2009 5.70E+02 5.70E+02

12/29/2009 8.68E+02 8.68E+02

12/30/2009 8.53E+02 8.53E+02

12/31/2009 6.44E+02 6.44E+02

1/1/2010 3.06E+02 3.06E+02

1/2/2010 3.73E+02 3.73E+02

1/3/2010 6.43E+02 6.43E+02

1/4/2010 3.11E+02 3.11E+02

1/5/2010 2.38E+02 2.38E+02

1/6/2010 2.00E+02 2.00E+02

1/7/2010 4.52E+02 4.52E+02

1/8/2010 3.09E+02 3.09E+02

1/9/2010 5.93E+02 5.93E+02

1/10/2010 7.19E+02 7.19E+02

1/11/2010 3.41E+02 3.41E+02

1/12/2010 3.84E+02 3.84E+02

1/13/2010 5.17E+02 5.17E+02

1/14/2010 3.72E+02 3.72E+02

1/15/2010 3.94E+02 3.94E+02

1/16/2010 6.61E+02 6.61E+02

1/17/2010 7.40E+02 7.40E+02

1/18/2010 5.47E+02 5.47E+02

1/19/2010 1.25E+03 1.25E+03

1/20/2010 9.25E+02 9.25E+02

1/21/2010 8.20E+02 8.20E+02

1/22/2010 1.16E+03 1.16E+03

1/23/2010 7.71E+02 7.71E+02

1/24/2010 7.29E+02 7.29E+02

1/25/2010 4.45E+02 4.45E+02

1/26/2010 7.39E+02 7.39E+02

1/27/2010 5.20E+02 5.20E+02

1/28/2010 8.92E+02 8.92E+02

1/29/2010 5.87E+02 5.87E+02

1/30/2010 9.63E+02 9.63E+02

1/31/2010 8.73E+02 8.73E+02

2/1/2010 5.00E+02 5.00E+02

2/2/2010 5.81E+02 5.81E+02

2/3/2010 8.23E+02 8.23E+02

2/4/2010 5.82E+02 5.82E+02

2/5/2010 6.52E+02 6.52E+02

2/6/2010 5.59E+02 5.59E+02

2/7/2010 5.88E+02 5.88E+02

2/8/2010 6.05E+02 6.05E+02

2/9/2010 8.39E+02 8.39E+02

2/10/2010 5.85E+02 5.85E+02

2/11/2010 6.38E+02 6.38E+02

2/12/2010 6.98E+02 6.98E+02

2/13/2010 2.79E+02 2.79E+02

2/14/2010 3.04E+02 3.04E+02

2/15/2010 7.45E+02 7.45E+02

2/16/2010 4.84E+02 4.84E+02

2/17/2010 5.36E+02 5.36E+02

2/18/2010 3.94E+02 3.94E+02

2/19/2010 5.14E+02 5.14E+02

2/20/2010 3.69E+02 3.69E+02

2/21/2010 1.87E+02 1.87E+02

2/22/2010 2.83E+02 2.83E+02

2/23/2010 3.78E+02 3.78E+02

2/24/2010 1.71E+02 1.71E+02

2/25/2010 2.27E+02 2.27E+02

2/26/2010 3.27E+02 3.27E+02

2/27/2010 2.38E+02 2.38E+02

2/28/2010 2.15E+02 2.15E+02

3/1/2010 6.60E+02 6.60E+02

3/2/2010 6.31E+02 6.31E+02

3/3/2010 6.76E+02 6.76E+02

140
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

3/4/2010 #DIV/0!

3/5/2010 8.09E+02 8.09E+02

3/6/2010 6.53E+02 6.53E+02

3/7/2010 7.38E+02 7.38E+02

3/8/2010 5.90E+02 5.90E+02

3/9/2010 7.42E+02 7.42E+02

3/10/2010 6.28E+02 6.28E+02

3/11/2010 7.31E+02 7.31E+02

3/12/2010 6.39E+02 6.39E+02

3/13/2010 5.68E+02 5.68E+02

3/14/2010 5.89E+02 5.89E+02

3/15/2010 6.98E+02 6.98E+02

3/16/2010 8.18E+02 8.18E+02

3/17/2010 4.74E+02 4.74E+02

3/18/2010 4.72E+02 4.72E+02

3/19/2010 5.76E+02 5.76E+02

3/20/2010 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

3/21/2010 4.25E+02 4.25E+02

3/22/2010 4.43E+02 4.43E+02

3/23/2010 4.15E+02 4.15E+02

3/24/2010 5.52E+02 5.52E+02

3/25/2010 5.52E+02 5.52E+02

3/26/2010 5.67E+02 5.67E+02

3/27/2010 7.52E+02 7.52E+02

3/28/2010 4.65E+02 4.65E+02

3/29/2010 4.09E+02 4.09E+02

3/30/2010 3.08E+02 3.08E+02

3/31/2010 6.06E+02 6.06E+02

4/1/2010 1.02E+03 1.02E+03

4/2/2010 1.56E+02 1.56E+02

4/3/2010 3.49E+02 3.49E+02

4/4/2010 3.48E+02 3.48E+02

4/5/2010 3.18E+02 3.18E+02

4/6/2010 4.50E+02 4.50E+02

4/7/2010 2.59E+02 2.59E+02

4/8/2010 3.18E+02 3.18E+02

4/9/2010 3.10E+02 3.10E+02

4/10/2010 4.20E+02 4.20E+02

4/11/2010 3.73E+02 3.73E+02

4/12/2010 4.58E+02 4.58E+02

4/13/2010 4.02E+02 4.02E+02

4/14/2010 7.34E+02 7.34E+02

4/15/2010 4.74E+02 4.74E+02

4/16/2010 8.19E+02 8.19E+02

4/17/2010 4.81E+02 4.81E+02

4/18/2010 6.83E+02 6.83E+02

4/19/2010 3.27E+02 3.27E+02

4/20/2010 5.94E+02 5.94E+02

4/21/2010 5.57E+02 5.57E+02

4/22/2010 4.97E+02 4.97E+02

4/23/2010 6.07E+02 6.07E+02

4/24/2010 5.49E+02 5.49E+02

4/25/2010 8.99E+02 8.99E+02

4/26/2010 6.72E+02 6.72E+02

4/27/2010 7.47E+02 7.47E+02

4/28/2010 6.60E+02 6.60E+02

4/29/2010 4.61E+02 4.61E+02

4/30/2010 5.16E+02 5.16E+02

5/1/2010 7.37E+02 7.37E+02

5/2/2010 6.32E+02 6.32E+02

5/3/2010 7.05E+02 7.05E+02

5/4/2010 6.66E+02 6.66E+02

5/5/2010 6.50E+02 6.50E+02

5/6/2010 3.50E+02 3.50E+02

5/7/2010 4.16E+02 4.16E+02

5/8/2010 4.51E+02 4.51E+02

5/9/2010 3.92E+02 3.92E+02

5/10/2010 3.83E+02 3.83E+02

5/11/2010 4.16E+02 4.16E+02

5/12/2010 3.16E+02 3.16E+02

5/13/2010 1.92E+02 1.92E+02

5/14/2010 3.98E+02 3.98E+02

5/15/2010 5.77E+02 5.77E+02

5/16/2010 5.33E+02 5.33E+02

5/17/2010 4.74E+02 4.74E+02

5/18/2010 8.19E+02 8.19E+02

5/19/2010 7.77E+02 7.77E+02

5/20/2010 4.49E+02 4.49E+02

5/21/2010 3.36E+02 3.36E+02

5/22/2010 4.18E+02 4.18E+02

5/23/2010 3.81E+02 3.81E+02

5/24/2010 7.21E+02 7.21E+02

5/25/2010 6.85E+02 6.85E+02

5/26/2010 7.63E+02 7.63E+02

5/27/2010 7.58E+02 7.58E+02

5/28/2010 6.87E+02 6.87E+02

5/29/2010 6.35E+02 6.35E+02

5/30/2010 9.25E+02 9.25E+02

5/31/2010 2.16E+02 2.16E+02

6/1/2010 2.49E+02 2.49E+02

6/2/2010 1.00E+02 1.00E+02

6/3/2010 3.47E+02 3.47E+02

6/4/2010 6.84E+02 6.84E+02

6/5/2010 4.64E+02 4.64E+02

6/6/2010 4.54E+02 4.54E+02

6/7/2010 2.88E+02 2.88E+02

6/8/2010 3.48E+02 3.48E+02

6/9/2010 3.05E+02 3.05E+02

6/10/2010 3.40E+02 3.40E+02

6/11/2010 3.40E+02 3.40E+02

6/12/2010 3.30E+02 3.30E+02

6/13/2010 3.50E+02 3.50E+02

6/14/2010 3.65E+02 3.65E+02

6/15/2010 4.14E+02 4.14E+02

6/16/2010 5.84E+02 5.84E+02

6/17/2010 4.72E+02 4.72E+02

6/18/2010 5.38E+02 5.38E+02

6/19/2010 4.95E+02 4.95E+02

6/20/2010 5.28E+02 5.28E+02

6/21/2010 4.41E+02 4.41E+02

6/22/2010 5.04E+02 5.04E+02

6/23/2010 5.23E+02 5.23E+02

6/24/2010 4.16E+02 4.16E+02

6/25/2010 5.15E+02 5.15E+02

6/26/2010 4.66E+02 4.66E+02

6/27/2010 5.11E+02 5.11E+02

6/28/2010 3.54E+02 3.54E+02

6/29/2010 5.11E+02 5.11E+02

6/30/2010 4.22E+02 4.22E+02

7/1/2010 5.62E+02 5.62E+02

7/2/2010 7.45E+02 7.45E+02

7/3/2010 6.61E+02 6.61E+02

7/4/2010 5.99E+02 5.99E+02

7/5/2010 4.99E+02 4.99E+02

7/6/2010 7.77E+02 7.77E+02

7/7/2010 4.05E+02 4.05E+02

7/8/2010 6.28E+02 6.28E+02

7/9/2010 7.22E+02 7.22E+02

7/10/2010 6.44E+02 6.44E+02

7/11/2010 5.27E+02 5.27E+02

141
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

7/12/2010 4.55E+02 4.55E+02

7/13/2010 5.05E+02 5.05E+02

7/14/2010 4.19E+02 4.19E+02

7/15/2010 5.48E+02 5.48E+02

7/16/2010 4.64E+02 4.64E+02

7/17/2010 5.38E+02 5.38E+02

7/18/2010 3.85E+02 3.85E+02

7/19/2010 4.21E+02 4.21E+02

7/20/2010 5.63E+02 5.63E+02

7/21/2010 5.58E+02 5.58E+02

7/22/2010 5.88E+02 5.88E+02

7/23/2010 5.87E+02 5.87E+02

7/24/2010 6.73E+02 6.73E+02

7/25/2010 4.07E+02 4.07E+02

7/26/2010 1.00E+03 1.00E+03

7/27/2010 6.35E+02 6.35E+02

7/28/2010 5.26E+02 5.26E+02

7/29/2010 4.39E+02 4.39E+02

7/30/2010 5.99E+02 5.99E+02

7/31/2010 3.87E+02 3.87E+02

8/1/2010 4.48E+02 4.48E+02

8/2/2010 4.39E+02 4.39E+02

8/3/2010 3.70E+02 3.70E+02

8/4/2010 3.92E+02 3.92E+02

8/5/2010 4.25E+02 4.25E+02

8/6/2010 4.10E+02 4.10E+02

8/7/2010 3.99E+02 3.99E+02

8/8/2010 6.43E+02 6.43E+02

8/9/2010 7.73E+02 7.73E+02

8/10/2010 7.36E+02 7.36E+02

8/11/2010 7.79E+02 7.79E+02

8/12/2010 7.10E+02 7.10E+02

8/13/2010 6.69E+02 6.69E+02

8/14/2010 8.29E+02 8.29E+02

8/15/2010 1.44E+03 1.44E+03

8/16/2010 7.36E+02 7.36E+02

8/17/2010 8.86E+02 8.86E+02

8/18/2010 5.97E+02 5.97E+02

8/19/2010 4.84E+02 4.84E+02

8/20/2010 7.84E+02 7.84E+02

8/21/2010 7.05E+02 7.05E+02

8/22/2010 6.88E+02 6.88E+02

8/23/2010 5.87E+02 5.87E+02

8/24/2010 5.67E+02 5.67E+02

8/25/2010 6.86E+02 6.86E+02

8/26/2010 6.44E+02 6.44E+02

8/27/2010 5.79E+02 5.79E+02

8/28/2010 5.80E+02 5.80E+02

8/29/2010 5.79E+02 5.79E+02

8/30/2010 3.75E+02 3.75E+02

8/31/2010 3.00E+02 3.00E+02

9/1/2010 3.43E+02 3.43E+02

9/2/2010 3.52E+02 3.52E+02

9/3/2010 6.15E+02 6.15E+02

9/4/2010 5.74E+02 5.74E+02

9/5/2010 6.76E+02 6.76E+02

9/6/2010 5.60E+02 5.60E+02

9/7/2010 4.97E+02 4.97E+02

9/8/2010 5.75E+02 5.75E+02

9/9/2010 4.96E+02 4.96E+02

9/10/2010 4.87E+02 4.87E+02

9/11/2010 8.80E+02 8.80E+02

9/12/2010 9.69E+02 9.69E+02

9/13/2010 5.18E+02 5.18E+02

9/14/2010 4.56E+02 4.56E+02

9/15/2010 7.16E+02 7.16E+02

9/16/2010 5.36E+02 5.36E+02

9/17/2010 2.30E+02 2.30E+02

9/18/2010 2.83E+02 2.83E+02

9/19/2010 2.61E+02 2.61E+02

9/20/2010 3.52E+02 3.52E+02

9/21/2010 2.82E+02 2.82E+02

9/22/2010 3.18E+02 3.18E+02

9/23/2010 3.67E+02 3.67E+02

9/24/2010 5.19E+02 5.19E+02

9/25/2010 4.50E+02 4.50E+02

9/26/2010 3.92E+02 3.92E+02

9/27/2010 2.99E+02 2.99E+02

9/28/2010 3.17E+02 3.17E+02

9/29/2010 2.44E+02 2.44E+02

9/30/2010 5.66E+02 5.66E+02

10/1/2010 4.51E+02 4.51E+02

10/2/2010 5.40E+02 5.40E+02

10/3/2010 4.66E+02 4.66E+02

10/4/2010 3.19E+02 3.19E+02

10/5/2010 2.84E+02 2.84E+02

10/6/2010 5.19E+02 5.19E+02

10/7/2010 3.37E+02 3.37E+02

10/8/2010 4.10E+02 4.10E+02

10/9/2010 3.83E+02 3.83E+02

10/10/2010 #DIV/0!

10/11/2010 4.58E+02 4.58E+02

10/12/2010 4.43E+02 4.43E+02

10/13/2010 3.78E+02 3.78E+02

10/14/2010 8.01E+02 8.01E+02

10/15/2010 5.98E+02 5.98E+02

10/16/2010 6.41E+02 6.41E+02

10/17/2010 7.28E+02 7.28E+02

10/18/2010 5.36E+02 5.36E+02

10/19/2010 5.40E+02 5.40E+02

10/20/2010 5.14E+02 5.14E+02

10/21/2010 6.55E+02 6.55E+02

10/22/2010 4.52E+02 4.52E+02

10/23/2010 4.11E+02 4.11E+02

10/24/2010 2.93E+02 2.93E+02

10/25/2010 3.02E+02 3.02E+02

10/26/2010 3.01E+02 3.01E+02

10/27/2010 5.13E+02 5.13E+02

10/28/2010 4.05E+02 4.05E+02

10/29/2010 4.15E+02 4.15E+02

10/30/2010 8.78E+02 8.78E+02

10/31/2010 4.38E+02 4.38E+02

11/1/2010 6.52E+02 6.52E+02

11/2/2010 5.56E+02 5.56E+02

11/3/2010 5.57E+02 5.57E+02

11/4/2010 5.08E+02 5.08E+02

11/5/2010 4.92E+02 4.92E+02

11/6/2010 6.26E+02 6.26E+02

11/7/2010 5.99E+02 5.99E+02

11/8/2010 8.67E+02 8.67E+02

11/9/2010 3.65E+02 3.65E+02

11/10/2010 4.70E+02 4.70E+02

11/11/2010 1.40E+03 1.40E+03

11/12/2010 4.61E+02 4.61E+02

11/13/2010 5.15E+02 5.15E+02

11/14/2010 4.99E+02 4.99E+02

11/15/2010 5.21E+02 5.21E+02

11/16/2010 4.62E+02 4.62E+02

11/17/2010 3.45E+02 3.45E+02

11/18/2010 3.89E+02 3.89E+02

142
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

11/19/2010 2.25E+02 2.25E+02

11/20/2010 3.77E+02 3.77E+02

11/21/2010 4.81E+02 4.81E+02

11/22/2010 5.27E+02 5.27E+02

11/23/2010 5.39E+02 5.39E+02

11/24/2010 3.74E+02 3.74E+02

11/25/2010 4.56E+02 4.56E+02

11/26/2010 5.46E+02 5.46E+02

11/27/2010 5.20E+02 5.20E+02

11/28/2010 5.69E+02 5.69E+02

11/29/2010 6.50E+02 6.50E+02

11/30/2010 4.88E+02 4.88E+02

12/1/2010 5.70E+02 5.70E+02

12/2/2010 6.69E+02 6.69E+02

12/3/2010 6.67E+02 6.67E+02

12/4/2010 6.14E+02 6.14E+02

12/5/2010 5.29E+02 5.29E+02

12/6/2010 9.22E+02 9.22E+02

12/7/2010 1.61E+03 1.61E+03

12/8/2010 4.80E+02 4.80E+02

12/9/2010 5.66E+02 5.66E+02

12/10/2010 5.23E+02 5.23E+02

12/11/2010 5.61E+02 5.61E+02

12/12/2010 4.53E+02 4.53E+02

12/13/2010 5.76E+02 5.76E+02

12/14/2010 6.07E+02 6.07E+02

12/15/2010 5.44E+02 5.44E+02

12/16/2010 3.97E+02 3.97E+02

12/17/2010 3.57E+02 3.57E+02

12/18/2010 4.70E+02 4.70E+02

12/19/2010 5.37E+02 5.37E+02

12/20/2010 4.35E+02 4.35E+02

12/21/2010 4.20E+02 4.20E+02

12/22/2010 3.34E+02 3.34E+02

12/23/2010 3.80E+02 3.80E+02

12/24/2010 9.17E+02 9.17E+02

12/25/2010 8.10E+02 8.10E+02

12/26/2010 7.58E+02 7.58E+02

12/27/2010 5.59E+02 5.59E+02

12/28/2010 7.55E+02 7.55E+02

12/29/2010 8.63E+02 8.63E+02

12/30/2010 1.08E+03 1.08E+03

12/31/2010 #DIV/0!

143
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

GACT Worst Performer Determination

Method Method 8260B

Resin Type Dispersion

HAP (0=no, 1=yes) 1

Wet Resin From Stripper Bottoms Exclude Data (0=no, 1=y 0

Average of Wet Resin from Stripper Bottoms, ppm Analyte_Std

Reporting Plant Sample Date Acetaldehyde Acetophenone Cumene Ethyl 

Chloride

Ethylene 

Dichloride

Ethylidene 

Dichloride Formaldehyde Methanol Methyl Chloride

FPC DE 1/12/2010 1.06E+01 6.25E+00 7.87E-01 2.46E-01 1.10E+01 2.20E-01

1/13/2010 9.29E+00 1.01E+01 1.15E+00 7.09E-01 5.90E+00 3.64E-01

1/14/2010 1.16E+01 5.81E+00 1.03E+00 4.55E-01 1.10E+01 2.13E-01

1/15/2010 6.69E+00 6.10E+00 6.82E-01 1.40E-01 1.20E+01 2.40E-01

1/16/2010 1.29E+01 1.02E+01 6.47E-01 2.13E-01 1.20E-01 1.30E-01

1/17/2010 2.38E+01 1.44E+01 5.69E-01 2.77E-01 1.20E-01 2.50E-01

1/18/2010 1.41E+01 1.24E+01 5.94E-01 1.40E-01 5.90E+00 2.50E-01

1/19/2010 1.69E+01 4.38E+00 3.61E-01 1.40E-01 9.80E+00 1.60E-01

1/20/2010 1.28E+01 1.63E+01 8.86E-01 1.49E-01 9.10E+00 2.20E-01

1/29/2010 4.70E+01 1.96E+01 1.12E+00 3.74E-01 1.00E+01 8.49E-01

1/30/2010 3.62E+01 7.29E+00 4.48E-01 1.50E-01 1.00E+01 2.80E-01

1/31/2010 3.18E+01 4.30E+00 2.72E-01 1.83E-01 1.30E+01 2.30E-01

2/1/2010 1.14E+01 6.36E+00 3.82E-01 1.40E-01 5.80E+00 2.93E-01

2/2/2010 4.00E+00 1.12E+01 1.35E+00 6.90E-01 1.80E-01 2.20E-01

2/3/2010 2.53E+00 1.03E+01 1.35E+00 6.80E-01 1.10E-01 4.20E-01

2/4/2010 2.68E+00 8.99E+00 1.35E+00 6.80E-01 1.10E-01 2.10E-01

2/6/2010 5.32E+00 9.72E+00 1.14E+00 3.90E-01 1.10E+00 2.20E-01

2/7/2010 3.84E+00 9.04E+00 1.20E+00 3.61E-01 1.10E+00 5.80E-01

2/10/2010 1.43E+00 8.09E+00 4.75E-01 3.43E-01 1.20E+00 1.20E-01

2/11/2010 2.26E+00 1.46E+01 7.15E-01 5.44E-01 1.20E+00 2.30E-01

2/13/2010 5.18E-01 6.33E+00 4.44E-01 1.40E-01 1.20E+00 1.20E-01

P1-Henry 12/9/2009 6.60E+00 1.30E+01 6.60E+00 6.60E+00 1.30E+01

12/10/2009 3.70E+00 7.40E+00 3.70E+00 3.70E+00 7.40E+00

12/11/2009 1.40E+00 2.80E+00 1.40E+00 1.40E+00 2.80E+00

12/12/2009 1.80E+00 3.50E+00 1.80E+00 1.80E+00 3.50E+00

12/13/2009 1.80E+00 3.50E+00 1.80E+00 1.80E+00 3.50E+00

12/14/2009 1.70E-01 3.50E-01 1.70E-01 1.70E-01 3.50E-01

12/15/2009 1.80E+00 3.60E+00 1.80E+00 1.80E+00 3.60E+00

12/16/2009 1.60E+00 3.20E+00 1.60E+00 1.60E+00 3.20E+00

12/17/2009 1.90E-01 3.80E-01 1.90E-01 1.90E-01 3.80E-01

12/18/2009 4.40E+00 8.80E+00 4.40E+00 4.40E+00 8.80E+00

12/19/2009 2.70E+00 5.50E+00 2.70E+00 2.70E+00 5.50E+00

12/20/2009 5.20E+00 1.00E+01 5.20E+00 5.20E+00 1.00E+01

1/5/2010 8.10E+00 8.10E+00 8.10E+00 8.10E+00 1.60E+01

1/6/2010 3.40E+00 3.40E+00 3.40E+00 3.40E+00 6.80E+00

1/7/2010 3.60E+00 3.60E+00 3.60E+00 3.60E+00 7.10E+00

1/8/2010 6.40E+00 6.40E+00 6.40E+00 6.40E+00 1.30E+01

1/9/2010 5.40E+00 5.40E+00 5.40E+00 5.40E+00 1.10E+01

1/10/2010 3.70E+00 3.70E+00 3.70E+00 3.70E+00 7.40E+00

1/11/2010 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 8.50E+00

1/12/2010 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 8.30E+00

1/13/2010 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 1.00E+01

1/14/2010 4.90E+00 4.90E+00 4.90E+00 4.90E+00 9.80E+00

1/15/2010 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 1.00E+01

1/16/2010 3.30E+00 3.30E+00 3.30E+00 3.30E+00 6.70E+00

1/17/2010 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 2.20E+01

1/18/2010 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 2.30E+01

1/19/2010 4.60E+00 4.60E+00 4.60E+00 4.60E+00 9.20E+00

1/20/2010 3.80E+00 3.80E+00 3.80E+00 3.80E+00 7.60E+00

1/21/2010 1.70E+00 1.70E+00 1.70E+00 1.70E+00 3.30E+00

1/22/2010 5.30E+00 5.30E+00 5.30E+00 5.30E+00 1.10E+01

P1-Ptown 12/2/2009 6.00E-02 1.10E+00 2.00E-01 6.40E+00 1.42E-01 5.50E-02 4.73E-01 1.57E+01 7.73E-01

12/3/2009 6.00E-02 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 6.30E+00 1.40E-01 5.50E-02 5.23E-01 1.11E+01 6.43E-01

12/4/2009 9.56E-02 1.10E+00 2.10E-01 1.74E+01 2.38E-01 7.54E-02 6.36E-01 1.22E+01 9.66E-01

12/5/2009 4.70E-02 1.80E+00 1.60E-01 3.68E+00 2.07E-01 9.22E-02 1.56E-01 4.80E-02 5.00E-02

12/6/2009 2.67E-01 2.75E+01 6.74E-01 3.68E+01 4.42E-01 1.10E-01 3.95E-01 3.10E+00 4.42E+00

12/7/2009 5.52E-01 2.20E+00 9.32E-01 5.43E+01 7.56E-01 2.13E-01 3.41E-01 2.02E+02 5.55E+00

12/8/2009 2.64E-01 2.30E+00 4.00E-01 2.10E+01 4.72E-01 1.22E-01 6.31E-01 2.85E+01 1.16E+00

12/9/2009 3.42E-01 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 2.84E+01 6.01E-01 1.29E-01 5.10E-01 5.80E+00 3.20E+00

12/10/2009 4.14E-01 2.30E+00 7.70E-01 3.94E+01 5.17E-01 2.00E-01 3.89E-01 6.30E+00 5.45E+00

12/11/2009 4.82E-01 1.59E+01 1.81E+00 5.44E+01 8.29E-01 1.30E-01 3.43E-01 1.20E+01 3.41E+00

12/12/2009

12/13/2009 4.20E-01 2.20E+00 4.00E-01 4.73E+01 5.95E-01 1.10E-01 3.81E-01 1.30E+01 4.10E+00

12/14/2009 1.09E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 4.16E+01 9.54E-01 2.00E-01 1.50E-01 3.10E+00 2.10E+00

12/15/2009 4.34E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 1.55E+01 9.73E-01 2.00E-01 1.72E-01 1.20E+01 2.40E-01

12/16/2009 1.30E+00 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 3.62E+01 5.10E-01 6.91E-02 5.02E-01 1.20E+01 3.58E+00

12/17/2009 2.93E-01 2.20E+00 2.00E-01 1.82E+01 3.60E-01 5.30E-02 3.87E-01 1.30E+01 6.70E-01

12/18/2009 3.62E-01 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 5.17E+01 6.31E-01 1.10E-01 3.21E-01 1.20E+01 5.32E+00

1/4/2010 6.19E-01 2.30E+00 8.60E-01 5.91E+01 9.65E-01 2.30E-01 5.11E-01 2.71E+01 4.71E+00

1/5/2010 8.34E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 3.79E+01 4.90E-01 2.00E-01 6.16E-01 3.75E+01 3.13E+00

1/6/2010 1.09E+00 2.30E+00 2.20E+00 6.57E+01 1.40E+00 5.70E-01 6.32E-01 1.07E+01 5.40E+00

1/7/2010 8.36E-01 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 1.66E+01 3.27E-01 1.10E-01 1.18E+00 8.11E+00 6.95E-01

1/8/2010 1.00E+00 2.20E+00 3.50E-01 3.75E+01 2.30E-01 9.30E-02 3.98E-01 7.84E+00 3.67E+00

1/9/2010 9.37E-01 2.20E+00 8.10E-01 4.47E+01 5.40E-01 2.10E-01 9.03E-01 2.57E+01 4.53E+00

1/10/2010

1/11/2010 1.84E+00 2.30E+00 5.41E-01 8.16E+01 1.21E+00 1.40E-01 7.38E-01 6.10E+00 5.92E+00

1/12/2010 3.51E+00 4.64E+01 8.53E-01 4.53E+01 5.85E-01 2.00E-01 2.71E+00 6.10E+00 1.76E+00

1/13/2010 1.06E+00 2.40E-01 2.20E-01 2.72E+01 3.16E-01 5.90E-02 7.83E-01 6.30E-01 5.89E+00

1/14/2010 7.23E-01 2.30E+00 8.26E-01 1.79E+01 4.36E-01 1.00E-01 6.90E-01 1.20E+01 1.97E+00

1/15/2010 7.49E-01 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 2.64E+01 7.25E-01 1.00E-01 6.11E-01 1.20E+01 2.38E+00

1/16/2010 2.20E-01 1.40E+00 1.12E+02 9.50E-01 3.80E-01 1.20E+01 1.95E+01

144
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

145
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

Facility Average of Total HAP Rank

P1-Henry 2.63E+01 1

FPC DE 2.90E+01 2

P1-Ptown 6.47E+01 3

146
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

147
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

GACT Limit Data

New Sources

Method Method 8260B

Resin Type Dispersion

HAP (0=no, 1=yes) 1

Wet Resin From Stripper Bottoms Exclude Data (0=no, 1=y 0

Average of Wet Resin from Stripper Bottoms, ppm Analyte_Std

Reporting Plant Sample Date BDL (0=no, 

1=yes)

Acetaldehyde Acetophenon

e

Cumene Ethyl 

Chloride

Ethylene 

Dichloride

Ethylidene 

Dichloride

Formaldehy

de Methanol Methyl Chloride

P1-Ptown 12/2/2009 0 6.40E+00 1.42E-01 4.73E-01 1.57E+01 7.73E-01

1 6.00E-02 1.10E+00 2.00E-01 5.50E-02

12/2/2009 Total 6.00E-02 1.10E+00 2.00E-01 6.40E+00 1.42E-01 5.50E-02 4.73E-01 1.57E+01 7.73E-01

12/3/2009 0 6.30E+00 5.23E-01 1.11E+01 6.43E-01

1 6.00E-02 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 1.40E-01 5.50E-02

12/3/2009 Total 6.00E-02 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 6.30E+00 1.40E-01 5.50E-02 5.23E-01 1.11E+01 6.43E-01

12/4/2009 0 9.56E-02 1.74E+01 2.38E-01 7.54E-02 6.36E-01 1.22E+01 9.66E-01

1 1.10E+00 2.10E-01

12/4/2009 Total 9.56E-02 1.10E+00 2.10E-01 1.74E+01 2.38E-01 7.54E-02 6.36E-01 1.22E+01 9.66E-01

12/5/2009 0 3.68E+00 2.07E-01 9.22E-02 1.56E-01

1 4.70E-02 1.80E+00 1.60E-01 4.80E-02 5.00E-02

12/5/2009 Total 4.70E-02 1.80E+00 1.60E-01 3.68E+00 2.07E-01 9.22E-02 1.56E-01 4.80E-02 5.00E-02

12/6/2009 0 2.67E-01 2.75E+01 6.74E-01 3.68E+01 4.42E-01 3.95E-01 4.42E+00

1 1.10E-01 3.10E+00

12/6/2009 Total 2.67E-01 2.75E+01 6.74E-01 3.68E+01 4.42E-01 1.10E-01 3.95E-01 3.10E+00 4.42E+00

12/7/2009 0 5.52E-01 9.32E-01 5.43E+01 7.56E-01 2.13E-01 3.41E-01 2.02E+02 5.55E+00

1 2.20E+00

12/7/2009 Total 5.52E-01 2.20E+00 9.32E-01 5.43E+01 7.56E-01 2.13E-01 3.41E-01 2.02E+02 5.55E+00

12/8/2009 0 2.64E-01 2.10E+01 4.72E-01 1.22E-01 6.31E-01 2.85E+01 1.16E+00

1 2.30E+00 4.00E-01

12/8/2009 Total 2.64E-01 2.30E+00 4.00E-01 2.10E+01 4.72E-01 1.22E-01 6.31E-01 2.85E+01 1.16E+00

12/9/2009 0 3.42E-01 2.84E+01 6.01E-01 1.29E-01 5.10E-01 3.20E+00

1 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 5.80E+00

12/9/2009 Total 3.42E-01 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 2.84E+01 6.01E-01 1.29E-01 5.10E-01 5.80E+00 3.20E+00

12/10/2009 0 4.14E-01 3.94E+01 5.17E-01 3.89E-01 5.45E+00

1 2.30E+00 7.70E-01 2.00E-01 6.30E+00

12/10/2009 Total 4.14E-01 2.30E+00 7.70E-01 3.94E+01 5.17E-01 2.00E-01 3.89E-01 6.30E+00 5.45E+00

12/11/2009 0 4.82E-01 1.59E+01 1.81E+00 5.44E+01 8.29E-01 1.30E-01 3.43E-01 3.41E+00

1 1.20E+01

12/11/2009 Total 4.82E-01 1.59E+01 1.81E+00 5.44E+01 8.29E-01 1.30E-01 3.43E-01 1.20E+01 3.41E+00

12/12/2009 0

12/12/2009 Total

12/13/2009 0 4.20E-01 4.73E+01 5.95E-01 3.81E-01 4.10E+00

1 2.20E+00 4.00E-01 1.10E-01 1.30E+01

12/13/2009 Total 4.20E-01 2.20E+00 4.00E-01 4.73E+01 5.95E-01 1.10E-01 3.81E-01 1.30E+01 4.10E+00

12/14/2009 0 1.09E-01 4.16E+01 9.54E-01 2.10E+00

1 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 2.00E-01 1.50E-01 3.10E+00

12/14/2009 Total 1.09E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 4.16E+01 9.54E-01 2.00E-01 1.50E-01 3.10E+00 2.10E+00

12/15/2009 0 4.34E-01 1.55E+01 9.73E-01 1.72E-01

1 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 2.00E-01 1.20E+01 2.40E-01

12/15/2009 Total 4.34E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 1.55E+01 9.73E-01 2.00E-01 1.72E-01 1.20E+01 2.40E-01

12/16/2009 0 1.30E+00 3.62E+01 5.10E-01 6.91E-02 5.02E-01 3.58E+00

1 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 1.20E+01

12/16/2009 Total 1.30E+00 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 3.62E+01 5.10E-01 6.91E-02 5.02E-01 1.20E+01 3.58E+00

12/17/2009 0 2.93E-01 1.82E+01 3.60E-01 3.87E-01 6.70E-01

1 2.20E+00 2.00E-01 5.30E-02 1.30E+01

12/17/2009 Total 2.93E-01 2.20E+00 2.00E-01 1.82E+01 3.60E-01 5.30E-02 3.87E-01 1.30E+01 6.70E-01

12/18/2009 0 3.62E-01 5.17E+01 6.31E-01 3.21E-01 5.32E+00

1 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 1.10E-01 1.20E+01

12/18/2009 Total 3.62E-01 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 5.17E+01 6.31E-01 1.10E-01 3.21E-01 1.20E+01 5.32E+00

1/4/2010 0 6.19E-01 5.91E+01 9.65E-01 5.11E-01 2.71E+01 4.71E+00

1 2.30E+00 8.60E-01 2.30E-01

1/4/2010 Total 6.19E-01 2.30E+00 8.60E-01 5.91E+01 9.65E-01 2.30E-01 5.11E-01 2.71E+01 4.71E+00

1/5/2010 0 8.34E-01 3.79E+01 6.16E-01 3.75E+01 3.13E+00

1 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 4.90E-01 2.00E-01

1/5/2010 Total 8.34E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 3.79E+01 4.90E-01 2.00E-01 6.16E-01 3.75E+01 3.13E+00

1/6/2010 0 1.09E+00 6.57E+01 6.32E-01 1.07E+01 5.40E+00

1 2.30E+00 2.20E+00 1.40E+00 5.70E-01

1/6/2010 Total 1.09E+00 2.30E+00 2.20E+00 6.57E+01 1.40E+00 5.70E-01 6.32E-01 1.07E+01 5.40E+00

1/7/2010 0 8.36E-01 1.66E+01 3.27E-01 1.18E+00 8.11E+00 6.95E-01

1 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 1.10E-01

1/7/2010 Total 8.36E-01 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 1.66E+01 3.27E-01 1.10E-01 1.18E+00 8.11E+00 6.95E-01

1/8/2010 0 1.00E+00 3.75E+01 3.98E-01 7.84E+00 3.67E+00

1 2.20E+00 3.50E-01 2.30E-01 9.30E-02

1/8/2010 Total 1.00E+00 2.20E+00 3.50E-01 3.75E+01 2.30E-01 9.30E-02 3.98E-01 7.84E+00 3.67E+00

1/9/2010 0 9.37E-01 4.47E+01 9.03E-01 2.57E+01 4.53E+00

1 2.20E+00 8.10E-01 5.40E-01 2.10E-01

1/9/2010 Total 9.37E-01 2.20E+00 8.10E-01 4.47E+01 5.40E-01 2.10E-01 9.03E-01 2.57E+01 4.53E+00

1/10/2010 0

1/10/2010 Total

1/11/2010 0 1.84E+00 5.41E-01 8.16E+01 1.21E+00 7.38E-01 5.92E+00

1 2.30E+00 1.40E-01 6.10E+00

1/11/2010 Total 1.84E+00 2.30E+00 5.41E-01 8.16E+01 1.21E+00 1.40E-01 7.38E-01 6.10E+00 5.92E+00

1/12/2010 0 3.51E+00 4.64E+01 8.53E-01 4.53E+01 5.85E-01 2.71E+00 1.76E+00

1 2.00E-01 6.10E+00

1/12/2010 Total 3.51E+00 4.64E+01 8.53E-01 4.53E+01 5.85E-01 2.00E-01 2.71E+00 6.10E+00 1.76E+00

1/13/2010 0 1.06E+00 2.72E+01 3.16E-01 7.83E-01 5.89E+00

1 2.40E-01 2.20E-01 5.90E-02 6.30E-01

1/13/2010 Total 1.06E+00 2.40E-01 2.20E-01 2.72E+01 3.16E-01 5.90E-02 7.83E-01 6.30E-01 5.89E+00

1/14/2010 0 7.23E-01 8.26E-01 1.79E+01 4.36E-01 6.90E-01 1.97E+00

1 2.30E+00 1.00E-01 1.20E+01

1/14/2010 Total 7.23E-01 2.30E+00 8.26E-01 1.79E+01 4.36E-01 1.00E-01 6.90E-01 1.20E+01 1.97E+00

1/15/2010 0 7.49E-01 2.64E+01 7.25E-01 6.11E-01 2.38E+00

1 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 1.00E-01 1.20E+01

1/15/2010 Total 7.49E-01 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 2.64E+01 7.25E-01 1.00E-01 6.11E-01 1.20E+01 2.38E+00

1/16/2010 0 1.12E+02 1.95E+01

148
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

1 2.20E-01 1.40E+00 9.50E-01 3.80E-01 1.20E+01

1/16/2010 Total 2.20E-01 1.40E+00 1.12E+02 9.50E-01 3.80E-01 1.20E+01 1.95E+01

149
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

Detection Limit Analysis

Facility HAP Sum Daily HAP 

Sum

ln Total 

HAP

P1-Ptown 2.35E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.42E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.49E+01 2.49E+01 3.21E+00

P1-Ptown 1.86E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.77E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.13E+01 2.13E+01 3.06E+00

P1-Ptown 3.16E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.31E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.29E+01 3.29E+01 3.49E+00

P1-Ptown 4.14E+00 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.11E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 6.24E+00 6.24E+00 1.83E+00

P1-Ptown 7.05E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.21E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 7.37E+01 7.37E+01 4.30E+00

P1-Ptown 2.65E+02 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.20E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.67E+02 2.67E+02 5.59E+00

P1-Ptown 5.21E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.70E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 5.48E+01 5.48E+01 4.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.32E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 8.47E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 4.17E+01 4.17E+01 3.73E+00

P1-Ptown 4.62E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 9.57E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 5.57E+01 5.57E+01 4.02E+00

P1-Ptown 7.73E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.20E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 8.93E+01 8.93E+01 4.49E+00

P1-Ptown 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 5.28E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.57E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 6.85E+01 6.85E+01 4.23E+00

P1-Ptown 4.48E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 6.49E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 5.13E+01 5.13E+01 3.94E+00

P1-Ptown 1.71E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.55E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.26E+01 3.26E+01 3.48E+00

P1-Ptown 4.22E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.45E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 5.67E+01 5.67E+01 4.04E+00

P1-Ptown 1.99E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.55E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.54E+01 3.54E+01 3.57E+00

P1-Ptown 5.83E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.48E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 7.32E+01 7.32E+01 4.29E+00

P1-Ptown 9.30E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.39E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 9.64E+01 9.64E+01 4.57E+00

P1-Ptown 8.00E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.73E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 8.37E+01 8.37E+01 4.43E+00

P1-Ptown 8.35E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 6.47E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 9.00E+01 9.00E+01 4.50E+00

P1-Ptown 2.77E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.82E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.06E+01 3.06E+01 3.42E+00

P1-Ptown 5.04E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 2.87E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 5.33E+01 5.33E+01 3.98E+00

P1-Ptown 7.68E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.76E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 8.05E+01 8.05E+01 4.39E+00

P1-Ptown 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 9.18E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 8.54E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.00E+02 1.00E+02 4.61E+00

P1-Ptown 1.01E+02 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 6.30E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.07E+02 1.07E+02 4.68E+00

P1-Ptown 3.52E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.15E+00 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.64E+01 3.64E+01 3.59E+00

P1-Ptown 2.25E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.44E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 3.69E+01 3.69E+01 3.61E+00

P1-Ptown 3.09E+01 0.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.48E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 4.56E+01 4.56E+01 3.82E+00

P1-Ptown 1.32E+02 0.00E+00

150
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

P1-Ptown 1.50E+01 1.00E+00

P1-Ptown 1.46E+02 1.46E+02 4.99E+00

151
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

GACT Limit and Variability Calculation

New Sources

Total Non-VC HAP PL 

Normal Lognormal

n 2.80E+01 2.80E+01

m 1.00E+00 1.00E+00

Average 6.76E+01 3.99E+00

Median 5.53E+01 4.01E+00

Standard Deviation 5.00E+01 7.04E-01

Minimum 6.24E+00 1.83E+00

Maximum 2.67E+02 5.59E+00

Skewness 2.52E+00 -6.73E-01

SE Skewness 4.63E-01 4.63E-01

Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

Kurtosis 8.89E+00 2.56E+00

SE Kurtosis 9.26E-01 9.26E-01

Kurtosis Test Non-normal Non-normal

t-statistic for UPL 2.47E+00 2.47E+00

UPL 1.93E+02 3.19E+02

Average for variability analysis 6.76E+01

Max DL < or = avg 4.75E+00

3x Max DL 1.43E+01

UPL 3.19E+02 ppmw

GACT Floor 3.19E+02 ppmw

1) if the 3x RDL value is less than or equal to the calculated floor or emissions limit, use the calculated floor or emissions limit value for the rule making. 

2) if the 3x RDL value is greater than the calculated floor or emissions limit, use the 3x RDL value as the floor or emissions limit adjusted for measurement variability for the rule making

152
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

153
	






Resin Sampling and Monitoring

Low High Average

Cost of US EPA Method 8260B [1] $201 $400 $301

Initial Compliance 

3 outlet tests x 2 strippers2$1,803.00

Total Compliance Cost $1,803.00

CRF (20 yr, 7%): (0.07*(1+0.07)^20)/((1+0.07)^20-1) 0.09439

Annual Cost of Initial Compliance `= (3 inlet tests*Avg Cost*2 Strippers)*CRF $170.19

Monitoring

1 tests per month for each type of resin x 2 strippers2$601.00

Certain Teed Lake Charles B 1 $7,212.00

Certain Teed Lake Charles B 1 $7,212.00

2. Average number of strippers calculated from facility submitted survey data

1. National Environmental Methods Index Website 

https://www.nemi.gov/apex/f?p=237:38:951365369293524::::P38_METHOD_ID:7041

Company Location Resin Type Number of 

Resin Types

TAC of 

Resin 

Testing

154
ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	







	







 

	


	

!

"




	

!

" #$%&'	




	
	!#$(&



"




 	

 	

 	

 	

 	

 	



      

      





 

	


	

!

"




	

!

" #$%&'	




	
	!#$(&



"




 	

 	

 	

 	

 	

 	



      

      

      

      

 
!"#      

$"      

)*

!" +,%+&-#

)*
.).&
/*
!" 0,012--

155
Attachment E 

GACT Analysis for Process and Maintenance Wastewater 

156
ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

	


Calculated GACT Baseline

Calculated Limits

Existing Area Source Current 

Level of Performance (Least 

Controlled, Avg 

Concentrations)

Existing Area Source 

Current Level of 

Control (Least 

Controlled, Variability 

Included)

New Area Source Current 

level of Performance

New Area Source Current 

level of Control

Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.10E+00 4.00E-01 2.10E+00

Total Non-VC HAP (ppmw) 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 1.80E-02

Existing and New Source GACT Summary for Wastewater (Option 2)

Pollutant

Existing Area Source Current 

Level of Performance (Least 

Controlled, Avg 

Concentrations)

Major Existing Source 

Requirements

Emissions for Current Level 

of Control 

Emissions Reductions as a 

Result of Complaince with 

Major Existing Source 

Requirements (tons/yr)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) 4.00E-01 6.80E+00 9.03E-01 -

Total Non-VC HAP (ppmw) 1.80E-02 1.10E+02 1.31E+01 -

Existing Source GACT Summary for Wastewater (Option 3) 

Pollutant

Existing Area Source Current 

Level of Performance (Least 

Controlled, Avg 

Concentrations)

Major New Source 

Requirement

Emissions for Current Level 

of Control 

Emissions Reductions as a 

Result of Complaince with 

Major New Source 

Requirements (tons/yr)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.80E-01 9.03E-01 8.55E-03

Total Non-VC HAP (ppmw) 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 1.31E+01 1.22E+01

New Source GACT Summary for Wastewater (Option 3) (Based on OxyVinyls Deer Park)

Pollutant

New Area Source Current 

Level of Performance (Least 

Controlled, Avg 

Concentrations)

Major New Source 

Requirement

Emissions for Current Level 

of Control 

Emissions Reductions as a 

Result of Complaince with 

Major New Source 

Requirements (tons/yr)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.80E-01 6.34E-01 1.31E-01

Total Non-VC HAP (ppmw) 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 9.44E+00 8.91E+00

GACT Analysis - Wastewater - Existing and New - Area Source - Costs to Meet NEW MACT Floor

Cost Component CTLC OVDP Model New Facility (Based on 

OxyVinyls Deer Park)

Initial Costs

Control Equipment Capital Cost

Hard Pipe / Pump / Motor for Uncontrolled Stream 150155.34 234074.35 234074.35

New Wastewater Stripper 4162340.18 7816537.83 7816537.83

Initial Wastewater Testing 981.00 981.00 981.00

Initial Record Keeping and Reporting Cost 2733.51 2733.51 2733.51

Total Initial Costs 4316210.02 8054326.70 8054326.70

Annual Costs

Annualized Capital Cost

Hard Pip / Pump / Motor for Uncontrolled Stream 14168.30 22084.61 22084.61

New Wastewater Stripper 392895.47 737825.88 737825.88

Annual Hardpipe/Pump/Motor Equipment Cost 13975.96 16462.59 13975.96

Annual Wastewater Stripper Cost 574607.30 1204593.50 1204593.50

Annualized Initial Testing and Monitoring Cost1

0.00 0.00 0.00

Annual Testing and Monitoring Cost 6376.50 6376.50 6376.50

Annual Record Keeping and Reporting Cost 3511.84 3511.84 3511.84

Total Annual Cost 1005535.37 1990854.91 1988368.29

1 - Initial Testing Cost less than annual; therefore, no amortization of initial testing cost

157
	






Wastewater - New and Existing Area Sources - VC


	

	
	
  

Averages based on Daily Averages

 ! " 		



 #$%  &' & 
 Normal LN

()*+ ,	- ./0	 	.112 Sample Size 1.20E+01 1.20E+01

34	- .-1	 	./2 Compliance Avg Period 1.00E+00 1.00E+00

	- .56	 	.2 Average 3.99E-01 -1.19E+00

$	- 5.-	 	6.15	 Median 2.89E-01 -1.24E+00

%	- .0	 	.2 Standard Deviation 4.16E-01 6.77E-01

,7	- .	 	.02 Minimum 1.20E-01 -2.12E+00

,7	- 1.1-	 	.2 Maximum 1.67E+00 5.14E-01

7	- 1.0	 	./2 Skewness 3.05E+00 1.32E+00

$	- ./62 0.5	 SE Skewness 7.07E-01 7.07E-01

("&	- .	 	.//2 Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

 	- .	 	.2 Kurtosis 9.92E+00 3.17E+00

*"	- 5.0-	 	6.-	 SE Kurtosis 1.41E+00 1.41E+00

Kurtosis Test Non-normal Non-normal

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 2.72E+00 2.72E+00

99.0% UPL 1.57E+00 2.07E+00

average in variability analysis 3.99E-01

Max DL < or = avg 1.00E-02

3x Max DL 3.00E-02

99.0% UPL 2.07E+00 ppm

MACT Floor Limit 2.10E+00 ppm

1) if the 3x RDL value is less than or equal to the calculated floor or 

emissions limit, use the calculated floor or emissions limit value

2) if the 3x RDL value is greater than the calculated floor or emissions 

limit, use the 3x RDL value as the floor or emissions limit adjusted for 

measurement variability

158
	






Wastewater - New and Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

MACT Floor Data Set

Company & Facility Originating Equipment Acetaldehyde EDC MeOH MIBK Total Non-VC HAP Rank

OxyVinyls Deer Park Waste Water Stripper 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 1

Formosa Baton Rouge Wastewater Stripping Columns 3.00E-01 3.00E-01 2

Westlake Calvert City Water Stripper Col Feed Heat Exch 2.26E+00 2.26E+00 3

Shintech Freeport HEAT EXCHANGER 3.90E+01 2.59E-01 3.93E+01 4

Shintech Addis Waste Water Stripper 4.00E+01 2.60E-01 4.03E+01 5

Shintech Plaquemine Waste Water Stripper 4.00E+01 3.00E-01 4.03E+01 6

Note: CTLC did not provide any WW concentration data other than VC for Stripper Outlet

159
	






Wastewater - Existing Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping/Stripper Costs 

Option 2 Analysis for New and Existing Area Sources

Pollutant Existing Source (ppmw) New Source (ppmw)VC 6.80E+00 2.80E-01Total Non_VC HAP 1.10E+02 1.80E-02

Stripper Outlet Wastewater Baseline Estimation 

Company & Facility Resin Type 2008 lbs of Resin 2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Stripper WW (Gal) 2008 Stripper Outlet (Gals)/Lb of Resin 2008 Stripper Outlet (Gals/YR) VC Conc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PPMW) % Reduction of VC Conc Needed to meet New Source MACT floor limit Total Non-VC HAP Conc W/ Avg for Non- Report (PMW) % Reduction of Total Non-VC HAP Conc Needed to meet MACT floor limit Baseline VC (Tons/YR) 

Certain Teed Lake Charles Bulk  No   8.05E-06  	 	 	 	 6.01E-06 

Dow Midland Other  No

Formosa Baton Rouge Other Yes  

Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes Formosa Point Comfort Other Yes OxyVinyls Deer Park Other Yes   	 	 	 	 2.87E-02 

OxyVinyls Pasadena Other Yes  

OxyVinyls Pedricktown Other PolyOne Henry Other/Dispersion  No   6.52E-02

PolyOne Pedricktown Dispersion  No   6.21E-03Shintech Addis Other Yes  

Shintech Freeport Other Yes  Shintech Plaquemine Other Yes  Westlake Calvert City Other  No   2.63E-02

Westlake Geismar Other  No   2.78E-02Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other  

Georgia Gulf Plaquemine Other 

Average* 3.14E-02*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20 

UNCONTROLLED WASTEWATER STREAMS in Bulk process

Wastewater Stripper Outlet Concentration Limits (Monthly Basis)

160
	






Wastewater - Existing Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping/Stripper Costs 

UnControlled Data

Data

FacilityName Sum of Total WW (GAL) Sum of VC2 Sum of Total Non-VC HAP2Formosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge 3.42E+08 1.43E-01Georgia Gulf Chemicals Aberdeen Facility 2.77E+07 0.00E+00Lake Charles Polymer Plant 5.96E+07 6.22E-04OxyVinyls Deer Park 0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena 4.62E+08 0.00E+00 1.44E+00PolyOne Henry 4.13E+07 3.44E-01Shintech Addis 5.11E+07 7.94E-03 2.49E+00Shintech Freeport 2.70E+07 6.76E-04 4.42E+00Shintech Plaquemine 1.00E+07 2.80E-03 6.20E-01Westlake Calvert City 6.46E+07 0.00E+00 6.10E-01Westlake Geismar 1.11E+08 6.67E-03

Company & Facility Total WW (GAL) Tons VC Tons Total Non-VC HAP VC Conc (PPMW) Total Non-VC HAP Conc (PPMW)

Formosa Baton Rouge 3.42E+08 1.43E-01 1.00E-01Georgia Gulf Aberdeen 2.77E+07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Certain Teed Lake Charles 5.96E+07 6.22E-04 2.50E-03OxyVinyls Deer Park 0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena 4.62E+08 0.00E+00 1.44E+00 0.00E+00 7.47E-01PolyOne Henry 4.13E+07 3.44E-01 2.00E+00Shintech Addis 5.11E+07 7.94E-03 2.49E+00 3.72E-02 1.17E+01Shintech Freeport 2.70E+07 6.76E-04 4.42E+00 6.00E-03 3.93E+01Shintech Plaquemine 1.00E+07 2.80E-03 6.20E-01 6.69E-02 1.48E+01Westlake Calvert City 6.46E+07 0.00E+00 6.10E-01 0.00E+00 2.26E+00Westlake Geismar 1.11E+08 6.67E-03 1.45E-02

Average 2.23E-01 1.38E+01

Company & Facility Resin Type 2008 lbs of Resin 2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Uncontrolled WW (Gal) 2008 Uncontrolled Flow (Gals/Lb of Resin 2008 Uncontrolled Flow (Gals/YR) VC Conc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PPMW) Total Non-VC HAP Conc W/ Avg for Non- Report (PMW) Baseline VC (Tons/YR) Baseline Total Non-VC HAP (Tons/YR) 	
 
 

Certain Teed Lake Charles Bulk  No   1.33E-01  2.50E-03 1.38E+01 6.22E-04 3.42E+00 1.50E+05 

Dow Midland Other  No 

Formosa Baton Rouge Other Yes   Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes  Formosa Point Comfort Other Yes  OxyVinyls Deer Park Other Yes   2.50E-03 1.38E+01 1.60E-03 8.79E+00 2.34E+05 

OxyVinyls Pasadena Other Yes   

OxyVinyls Pedricktown Other  PolyOne Henry Other/Dispersion  No   5.43E-01 PolyOne Pedricktown Dispersion  No  Shintech Addis Other Yes   Shintech Freeport Other Yes   Shintech Plaquemine Other Yes   Westlake Calvert City Other  No   5.88E-02 Westlake Geismar Other  No   2.32E-01 Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other   Georgia Gulf Plaquemine Other  

Average* 2.78E-01

*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20 in Bulk process

(see "Hardpipe Co

161
	






Wastewater - Existing Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping/Stripper Costs 

MAINTENANCE WW STREAMS

Company & Facility Total WW (GAL) VC Conc (PPMW) Total Non-VC HAP Conc (PPMW)

PolyOne Henry 2.22E+07 2.00E+00Shintech Freeport 4.30E+05 7.70E-02Westlake Calvert City 1.21E+06Westlake Geismar 8.52E+05 2.25E+00

2.13E+00 7.70E-02

Company & Facility Resin Type 2008 lbs of Resin 2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Main WW (Gal) 2008 Maint Flow (Gals/Lb of Resin 2008 Maint Flow (Gals/YR) VC Conc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PPMW) TOHAP Conc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PMW) Baseline VC (Tons/YR) Baseline TOHAP (Tons/YR)

Certain Teed Lake Charles Bulk  No   2.13E+00 7.70E-02 3.91E-01 1.42E-02

Dow Midland Other  No 

Formosa Baton Rouge Other Yes  Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes  Formosa Point Comfort Other Yes  OxyVinyls Deer Park Other Yes   2.13E+00 7.70E-02 4.81E-01 1.74E-02

OxyVinyls Pasadena Other Yes  

OxyVinyls Pedricktown Other  PolyOne Henry Other/Dispersion  No  2.22E+07 2.93E-01 PolyOne Pedricktown Dispersion  No  Shintech Addis Other Yes  Shintech Freeport Other Yes  4.30E+05 Shintech Plaquemine Other Yes  Westlake Calvert City Other  No  1.21E+06 1.10E-03 Westlake Geismar Other  No  8.52E+05 1.79E-03 Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other  Georgia Gulf Plaquemine Other  

Average* 9.85E-02*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20 in Bulk process

Stripper Outlet, Uncontrolled, and Maint. Wastewater Combined

Company & Facility Resin Type Baseline VC (Tons/YR) Baseline Total Non-VC HAP (Tons/YR) VC Reduction (Tons Per Year) Total Non-VC HAP Reduction (Tons Per Year)

Certain Teed - Lake Charles Bulk 3.91E-01 3.44E+00 1.80E-06 3.42E+00OxyVinyls Deer Park Suspension 5.12E-01 8.81E+00 8.55E-03 8.78E+00

162
ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Wastewater - New Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping Costs 

Option 2 Analysis for New and Existing Area Sources

Pollutant Existing Source (ppmw) New Source (ppmw)VC 6.80E+00 2.80E-01Total Non_VC HAP 110.00 0.018

Stripper Outlet Wastewater Baseline Estimation 

Company & Facility Resin Type 2008 lbs of Resin 2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Stripper WW (Gal) 2008 Stripper Outlet (Gals)/Lb of Resin 2008 Stripper Outlet (Gals/YR) VC Conc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PPMW) % Reduction of VC Conc Needed to meet MACT floor limit Total Non-VC HAP Conc W/ Avg for Non- Report (PMW) % Reduction of Total Non-VC HAP Conc Needed to meet MACT floor limit Baseline VC (Tons/YR) 

Certain Teed Lake Charles Bulk  No  		 8.05E-06

Dow Midland Other 
 No

Formosa Baton Rouge Other Yes  	

Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes 	Formosa Point Comfort Other Yes 
OxyVinyls Deer Park Other Yes 

 	     1.51E-01 

OxyVinyls Pasadena Other Yes  


OxyVinyls Pedricktown Other 	
PolyOne Henry Other/Dispersion  No 
 

 6.52E-02

PolyOne Pedricktown Dispersion 	 No 	 
 6.21E-03Shintech Addis Other Yes 
 

Shintech Freeport Other Yes 	 Shintech Plaquemine Other Yes 	 	
Westlake Calvert City Other  No   2.63E-02

Westlake Geismar Other 
 No 
	 	 2.78E-02Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other  


Georgia Gulf Plaquemine Other 

Average* 3.14E-02*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20 

UNCONTROLLED WASTEWATER STREAMS in Bulk process

Wastewater Stripper Outlet Concentration Limits (Monthly Basis)

163
ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Wastewater - New Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping Costs 

UnControlled Data

Data

FacilityName Sum of Total WW (GAL) Sum of VC2 Sum of Total Non-VC HAP2Formosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge 3.42E+08 1.43E-01Georgia Gulf Chemicals Aberdeen Facility 2.77E+07 0.00E+00Lake Charles Polymer Plant 5.96E+07 6.22E-04OxyVinyls Deer Park 0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena 4.62E+08 0.00E+00 1.44E+00PolyOne Henry 4.13E+07 3.44E-01Shintech Addis 5.11E+07 7.94E-03 2.49E+00Shintech Freeport 2.70E+07 6.76E-04 4.42E+00Shintech Plaquemine 1.00E+07 2.80E-03 6.20E-01Westlake Calvert City 6.46E+07 0.00E+00 6.10E-01Westlake Geismar 1.11E+08 6.67E-03

Company & Facility Total WW (GAL) Tons VC Tons Total Non-VC HAP VC Conc (PPMW) Total Non-VC HAP Conc (PPMW)

Formosa Baton Rouge 3.42E+08 1.43E-01 1.00E-01Georgia Gulf Aberdeen 2.77E+07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Certain Teed Lake Charles 5.96E+07 6.22E-04 2.50E-03OxyVinyls Deer Park 0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena 4.62E+08 0.00E+00 1.44E+00 0.00E+00 7.47E-01PolyOne Henry 4.13E+07 3.44E-01 2.00E+00Shintech Addis 5.11E+07 7.94E-03 2.49E+00 3.72E-02 1.17E+01Shintech Freeport 2.70E+07 6.76E-04 4.42E+00 6.00E-03 3.93E+01Shintech Plaquemine 1.00E+07 2.80E-03 6.20E-01 6.69E-02 1.48E+01Westlake Calvert City 6.46E+07 0.00E+00 6.10E-01 0.00E+00 2.26E+00Westlake Geismar 1.11E+08 6.67E-03 1.45E-02

Average 2.23E-01 1.38E+01

Company & Facility Resin Type 2008 lbs of Resin 2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Uncontrolled WW (Gal) 2008 Uncontrolled Flow (Gals/Lb of Resin 2008 Uncontrolled Flow (Gals/YR) VC Conc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PPMW) Total Non-VC HAP Conc W/ Avg for Non- Report (PMW) Baseline VC (Tons/YR) Baseline Total Non-VC HAP (Tons/YR) 	
 
 

Certain Teed Lake Charles Bulk  No  

 1.33E-01 

Dow Midland Other 
 No 

Formosa Baton Rouge Other Yes  	 	Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes 	 	Formosa Point Comfort Other Yes 
 	
OxyVinyls Deer Park Other Yes 

 
	 2.50E-03 1.38E+01 1.60E-03 8.79E+00 2.34E+05 

OxyVinyls Pasadena Other Yes   

OxyVinyls Pedricktown Other 	
 PolyOne Henry Other/Dispersion  No 
 	 5.43E-01 	PolyOne Pedricktown Dispersion 	 No 	 Shintech Addis Other Yes 
 
 
Shintech Freeport Other Yes 	  Shintech Plaquemine Other Yes 	  Westlake Calvert City Other  No  

 5.88E-02 

Westlake Geismar Other 
 No 
	  2.32E-01 Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other   Georgia Gulf Plaquemine Other  			

Average* 2.78E-01

*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20 in Bulk process

(see "Hardpipe Co

164
ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Wastewater - New Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping Costs 

MAINTENANCE WW STREAMS

Company & Facility Total WW (GAL) VC Conc (PPMW) Total Non-VC HAP Conc (PPMW)

PolyOne Henry 2.22E+07 2.00E+00Shintech Freeport 4.30E+05 7.70E-02Westlake Calvert City 1.21E+06Westlake Geismar 8.52E+05 2.25E+00

2.13E+00 7.70E-02

Company & Facility Resin Type 2008 lbs of Resin 2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Main WW (Gal) 2008 Maint Flow (Gals/Lb of Resin 2008 Maint Flow (Gals/YR) VC Conc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PPMW) TOHAP Conc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PMW) Baseline VC (Tons/YR) Baseline TOHAP (Tons/YR)

Certain Teed Lake Charles Bulk  No  Dow Midland Other 
 No 	
Formosa Baton Rouge Other Yes  	Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes 	 Formosa Point Comfort Other Yes 
 
OxyVinyls Deer Park Other Yes 

 
	 2.13E+00 7.70E-02 4.81E-01 1.74E-02

OxyVinyls Pasadena Other Yes  

OxyVinyls Pedricktown Other 	
 	
PolyOne Henry Other/Dispersion  No 
 2.22E+07 2.93E-01 PolyOne Pedricktown Dispersion 	 No 	 	
Shintech Addis Other Yes 
 

Shintech Freeport Other Yes 	 4.30E+05 	
Shintech Plaquemine Other Yes 	 Westlake Calvert City Other  No  1.21E+06 1.10E-03 
Westlake Geismar Other 
 No 
	 8.52E+05 1.79E-03 

Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other  
Georgia Gulf Plaquemine Other  

Average* 9.85E-02*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20 in Bulk process

Stripper Outlet, Uncontrolled, and Maint. Wastewater Combined

Company & Facility Resin Type Baseline VC (Tons/YR) Baseline Total Non-VC HAP (Tons/YR) VC Reduction (Tons Per Year) Total Non-VC HAP Reduction (Tons Per Year)

OxyVinyls Deer Park Suspension 6.34E-01 8.81E+00 1.31E-01 8.78E+00

165
ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Wastewater - Steam Stripper Costing

Steam Stripper - PVC Resin - Cost Analysis - VC and TOH

Company Westlake Chemical Corporation Certain Teed Lake Charles Certain Teed Lake CharlesFacility Westlake Geismar Process Type Suspension Bulk BulkProcess Type Std Suspension Bulk BulkProcess Unit ID P-1Stripped Resin Stream ID S-1Stripping Type Continuous Continuous ContinuousAnnual Production 476,390,000 447,348,640 551,155,000Inlet Stream Flow, liters/min 1930 0.02704 130 For CTLC and Model - s

A. Parameters (Inputs and Example Calculation)

1. Stripper inlet flow rate, pm (Q) 500 1930 0 1302. Annual operating hours, hr/yr (H) 8400 8400 8400 84003. Steam to Feed Ratio, kg /  (S) 0.096 0.060 0.060 0.0604. Electricity use, kWhr/day (EU) 260 260 260 2605. Operating labor rate, $/hr (LR) [2] $34.60 $34.60 $34.60 $34.606. Electricity cost, $/kWh (EC) [3] $0.07 $0.07 $0.07 $0.077. Water cost, $/1,000 gal (WC) [4] $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.208. Steam cost, $/1,000 lb (SC) [4] $4.65 $4.65 $4.65 $4.659. Capital recovery factor = [i x (1 + i)a] / [(1 + i)a - 1], where i = interest rate, a = equipment life a. Equipment CRF, 20-yr life, 7% interest 0.09439 0.09439 0.09439 0.0943910. Cost index a. 2010 641.1 641.1 641.1 641.1 b. 1989 356.0 356.0 356.0 356.0

B. Total Capital Investment

1. $ = 0.3731 x Q^0.267 x 10^6 $0 estimated total capital p2. $ / pm = $ / Q $0 

C. Direct Annual Operating Costs, $/yr

1. Electricity = EU / (24 hr/day) x H x EC $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 2. Steam = Q x S x (2.2 lb/kg) x (60 min/hr) x H x SC / 1000 $247,484 $596,994 $8 $40,154 3. Water = Q x (5220 liters water-min / liters feed-day) x (1 day / 24 hr) x H x (0.264 gal/liter) x 

WC / 1000

$0 $186,159 $3 $12,521 

4. Operating labor = (1 hr/shift) x (1 shift/8 hr) x H x LR $36,330 $0 $0 $0 5. Supervisory labor = 0.15 x (operating labor) $5,450 $0 $0 $0 6. Maintenance labor = (0.5 hr/shift) x (1 shift/8 hr) x H x (LR x 1.1) $19,982 $0 $0 $0 7. Maintenance materials = 0.02 x TCI $0 $0 $0 $0 

D. Indirect Annual Costs, $/yr

1. Overhead = 0.6 x (labor + maintenance materials) $37,057 $0 $0 $0 2. Property taxes, insurance, and administration

= 0.04 x TCI $0 $0 $0 $0 

3. Capital recovery = Equipment CRF x TCI $0 $0 $0 $0 

F. Include in Annual Cost? yes yes yesF. Total Annual Cost

1. $/yr = Direct Annual Costs + Indirect Annual Costs - Recovery Credit $352,381 $789,232 $6,090 $58,754 

Sources:1. Cost equations: HON BID, Vol 1-b and 1-c, Nov 1992 (EPA-453/D-92-016c)2. Operating labor rate: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics, May 2008 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates3. Electricity cost: Energy Information Administration. Average Industrial Retail Price of Electricity: October 2009.4. Water cost and steam cost: Air Compliance Advisor, version 7.5.5. ICIS, http://www.icis.com/v2/chemicals/9076567/vinyl-chloride/pricing.html, October 20, 2010. (Avg. $690/tonne = $0.313/lb)

Parameters/Costs Equation

166
ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Wastewater - Steam Stripper Costing

Steam Stripper - PVC Resin - Cost Analysis - VC and TOH

Company Westlake Chemical Corporation Certain Teed Lake Charles OxyVinyls Deer ParkFacility Westlake Geismar Process Type Suspension Bulk SuspensionProcess Type Std Suspension Bulk SuspensionProcess Unit ID P-1Stripped Resin Stream ID S-1Stripping Type Continuous Continuous ContinuousAnnual Production 476,390,000 447,348,640 551,155,000Inlet Stream Flow, liters/min 1930 448 1280

A. Parameters (Inputs and Example Calculation)

1. Stripper inlet flow rate, pm (Q) 500 1930 448 12802. Annual operating hours, hr/yr (H) 8400 8400 8400 84003. Steam to Feed Ratio, kg /  (S) 0.096 0.060 0.060 0.0604. Electricity use, kWhr/day (EU) 260 260 260 2605. Operating labor rate, $/hr (LR) [2] $34.60 $34.60 $34.60 $34.606. Electricity cost, $/kWh (EC) [3] $0.07 $0.07 $0.07 $0.077. Water cost, $/1,000 gal (WC) [4] $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.208. Steam cost, $/1,000 lb (SC) [4] $4.65 $4.65 $4.65 $4.659. Capital recovery factor = [i x (1 + i)a] / [(1 + i)a - 1], where i = interest rate, a = equipment life a. Equipment CRF, 20-yr life, 7% interest 0.09439 0.09439 0.09439 0.0943910. Cost index a. 2010 641.1 641.1 641.1 641.1 b. 1989 356.0 356.0 356.0 356.0

B. Total Capital Investment

1. $ = 0.3731 x Q^0.267 x 10^6 $0 $10,000,000 $4,162,340 $7,816,538 2. $ / pm = $ / Q $0 $5,182 $9,295 $6,107 

C. Direct Annual Operating Costs, $/yr

1. Electricity = EU / (24 hr/day) x H x EC $6,079 $0 $0 $0 2. Steam = Q x S x (2.2 lb/kg) x (60 min/hr) x H x SC / 1000 $247,484 $0 $138,518 $355,815 3. Water = Q x (5220 liters water-min / liters feed-day) x (1 day / 24 hr) x H x (0.264 gal/liter) x 

WC / 1000

$0 $0 $43,194 $110,953 

4. Operating labor = (1 hr/shift) x (1 shift/8 hr) x H x LR $36,330 $0 $0 $0 5. Supervisory labor = 0.15 x (operating labor) $5,450 $0 $0 $0 6. Maintenance labor = (0.5 hr/shift) x (1 shift/8 hr) x H x (LR x 1.1) $19,982 $0 $0 $0 7. Maintenance materials = 0.02 x TCI $0 $0 $0 $0 

D. Indirect Annual Costs, $/yr

1. Overhead = 0.6 x (labor + maintenance materials) $37,057 $0 $0 $0 2. Property taxes, insurance, and administration

= 0.04 x TCI $0 $0 $0 $0 

3. Capital recovery = Equipment CRF x TCI $0 $943,929 $392,895 $737,826 

F. Include in Annual Cost? yes yes yesF. Total Annual Cost

1. $/yr = Direct Annual Costs + Indirect Annual Costs - Recovery Credit $352,381 $943,929 $574,607 $1,204,593 

Sources:1. Cost equations: HON BID, Vol 1-b and 1-c, Nov 1992 (EPA-453/D-92-016c)2. Operating labor rate: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics, May 2008 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates3. Electricity cost: Energy Information Administration. Average Industrial Retail Price of Electricity: October 2009.4. Water cost and steam cost: Air Compliance Advisor, version 7.5.5. ICIS, http://www.icis.com/v2/chemicals/9076567/vinyl-chloride/pricing.html, October 20, 2010. (Avg. $690/tonne = $0.313/lb)

Parameters/Costs Equation

Difference in cost due to 

167
	






Cost of Piping Additional Steams to Wastewater Stripper Feed Tank

Wastewater Flow (GPM) 5.00E+01

Wastewater Flow (m^3/sec) 3.15E-03

Fluid Density (kg/m^3) 9.83E+02

Optimum Pipe Diameter (m) 6.66E-02

Optimum Pipe Diameter (inches) 2.62E+00

Caluclated (Rounded) Pipe Diameter (inches) 3.00E+00

Estimated Pipe Cost (304 Stainless)* (Jan. 2002 Dollars) $/linear foot 5.00E+01 <-----

Estimated Pipe Cost (Carbon Steel)* (Jan. 2002 Dollars) $/linear foot 3.30E+00

Pump and Pumping Cost

Pump cost (w/o motor)† 3.00E+03 1000 gpm, 20 ft, general purpose centrifugal 

Power Output (kW) (brake power) 1.13E+01

Pump motor cost§ 2.00E+03 Alternating Current, Explosion proof (~13 kW)

Motor Efficiency‡ 8.70E-01 ~11.25 bkW

Power requirement † (kW) 1.29E+01

Operating hours per year (Hrs) 8.40E+03

Electricity Cost ($/kWh) 7.00E-02

Electricity Cost per year ($/yr) 7.60E+03

Total Capital Investment 

Assumed length of pipe run (ft) 5.00E+02

Purchased cost of pipe (Stainless Steel) 2.50E+04

Purchased cost of pump 3.00E+03

Purchased cost of motor 2.00E+03

Equipment Cost 3.00E+04

Installation Factor** (Ratio of total cost for fittings and installation to the purchase cost for the new pipe) 1.40E+00

Installation Cost (includes pump and moto) 4.20E+04

Tax and Freight Factor†† 8.00E-02

Tax and Freight Cost 2.40E+03

Total Capital Investment (Jan. 2002) 7.44E+04

CE - July 02 (Pipes, Valves, and Fittings) 5.64E+02

CE - Feb 2010 (Pipes, Valves, and Fittings) 7.96E+02

Total Capital Investment (Feb. 2010) 1.05E+05

Annual Cost

Annual interest rate (fraction): 7.00E-02

System life (years): 2.00E+01

Capital recovery factor: 9.44E-02

Taxes, Insurance, Admin Factor 4.00E-02

Electricity 7.60E+03

Taxes Insurance, Administrative 4.20E+03

Capital Recovery 9.92E+03

Total Annual Cost ($/yr) 1.18E+04 does not incl. capital recovery

* From Figure 12-4 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers

** pg. 404 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers

† Estimated from Figure 12-19 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers

§ Estimated from Figure 12-24 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers

‡ Estimated from Figure 12-18 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers

†† - Eqn. 10.39 pg. 10-49 OAQPS Control Cost Manual Fifth Edition Feb. 1996

pg. 10-51 OAQPS Cost Control Manual (Ductwork)

Pipe Cost $/Linear Foot

Diameter 304/L. Stainless (Sch 40) Carbon Steel (Sch 40)

1.00E+00 1.70E+01 9.00E-01

2.00E+00 3.10E+01 2.10E+00

3.00E+00 5.00E+01 3.30E+00

4.00E+00 7.00E+01 5.80E+00

5.00E+00 9.00E+01 7.50E+00

6.00E+00 1.20E+02 1.00E+01

7.00E+00 1.60E+02 1.30E+01

8.00E+00 1.90E+02 1.70E+01

9.00E+00 2.10E+02 1.90E+01

1.00E+01 2.30E+02 2.00E+01

* From Figure 12-4 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers

168
	






Cost of Piping Additional Steams to Wastewater Stripper Feed Tank

Assumptions

Assume Hard pipe wastewater flow to Stripper Feed Tank

Assume all piped flow is turbulent

Assume water temperature of 140F

Optimum Pipe Diameter Calculation Eq. (12-15) Peters, 

Timmerhaus, & West pg. 501

Where:

Di,opt=optimum pipe diameter in meters

mv=volumetric flow rate (m^3/sec)

p=fluid density kg/m^3

Assumed 20 ft of head

GPM TCI TAC CR

1.00E+01 4.73E+04 1.40E+04 4.47E+03 1.84E+04

5.00E+01 1.05E+05 1.18E+04 9.92E+03 2.17E+04

1.00E+02 1.40E+05 1.32E+04 1.32E+04 2.64E+04

5.00E+02 2.98E+05 1.95E+04 2.81E+04 4.76E+04

1.00E+03 4.20E+05 2.44E+04 3.97E+04 6.41E+04





	 



























      







!"#$%&'

!"(&'

!"#$%&'

	 

 

      

169
ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Wastewater Testing and Monitoring Cost Algorithm

Wastewater Sampling and MonitoringCost of US EPA Method 8260B $201 $400 $301 *National Environmental Methods Index Website https://www.nemi.gov/apex/f?p=237:38:95Cost of US EPA Method 305 $190 http://analyticallaboratories.com/page.cfm?pageid=90 (Cost of Volatile Organics)Cost of US EPA Method 107 $0 Assume no cost since facilities are presumably already testing VC (Based on VI submitted 

Number of Initial Test Runs 1.00Number of Strippers 1.00Number of Continuous Test Runs 1.00Number of Continuous Tests per Year Monthly Testing 12.00Number of Uncontrolled Streams (As reported in survey data)

Number of Uncontrolled Streams with average for missing data

Non-VC HAP MeOH VC VC

Total 

Non-VC 

HAP

MeOH VC Total Non

VC HAP 

CTLC/OVDP/Model Facility 1 1 $300.50 $190.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.50 $190.00 $0.00 $3,606.

FacilityName Number of Wastewater streamsFormosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge 1Georgia Gulf Chemicals Aberdeen Facility 1

Lake Charles Polymer Plant 1OxyVinyls Deer Park 1OxyVinyls Pasadena 7PolyOne Henry 6Shintech Addis 3Shintech Freeport 1Shintech Plaquemine 2Union Carbide Texas City 6Westlake Calvert City 1Westlake Geismar 2Average 3

Initial Uncontrolled Stream Testing Stripper Outlet Testing

Initial Continuo

170
ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

P38_METHOD_ID:7041

$6,376.50

Total 

Annualized 

Cost

171
Attachment F 

GACT Analysis for Heat Exchange Systems 

172
ATTACHMENT F- HEAT EXCHANGER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Heat Exchange Systems - Summary of Clarification Data Submitted to EPA Calculated Emissions, Reductions, and Costs

Company Facility CT # Flow Rate (gpm) Pollutant Measured Leak Action Level Units Monitoring Frequency Monitoring Method Note(s) OVP Conc (ppbw) 5.93

1 10,000 Vinyl chloride Weekly Water sampling - GC headspace % of LAL 12%2 5,000 Vinyl chloride Weekly Water sampling - GC headspace Avg LAL (ppbw) 1363 Based on M107 only

Vinyl chloride 10000 ppbw Quarterly Method 415.1 Avg Conc (ppbw) 162

LAL (ppbw) 50 Cost per Repair ($/tower/yr) 

Formosa Baton Rouge 1 48,000 Vinyl chloride 10 ppbw Daily Method 601 DOR LAL (ppbw) 800

1 6,000 [no data]

2 3,000 [no data] DOR Period (days) 120

Formosa Point Comfort 158700 Repairs per yr 1

1 13,500 Vinyl chloride 250 ppbw Quarterly Method 1072 18,000 Vinyl chloride 250 ppbw Quarterly Method 107

REPORTED EMISSIONS 

FROM SURVEY

VC Conc LAL BASELINE EMISSIONS EMISSION REDUCTIO

3 18,000 Vinyl chloride 250 ppbw Quarterly Method 107 VC (tpy) (ppbw) (ppbw) VC (tpy) VC (tpy) 1 40,000 [cw pressure > process pressure] 1.62E+02 1.36E+03 3.54E+00 2.452 22,300 [cw pressure > process pressure] 1.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.77E+00 1.223 1,181 [no heat exchangers] 1.19E+03 1.00E+04 4.29E+01 4.114 11,000 [utility system]

Vinyl chloride 5000 ppbw Monthly Method 107 1.19E+00 1.00E+01 1.25E-01 0.00

1.62E+02 1.36E+03 2.13E+00 1.471.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.06E+00 7.34

Vinyl chloride 5000 ppbw Monthly Method 107 1.62E+02 1.36E+03 5.62E+01 3.88

2.97E+01 2.50E+02 8.78E-01 0.002.97E+01 2.50E+02 1.17E+00 0.00

Vinyl chloride 50 ppbw Monthly Method 107 2.97E+01 2.50E+02 1.17E+00 0.00Vinyl chloride 50 ppbw Monthly Method 107 

5.93E+02 5.00E+03 1.09E+01 1.00

OxyVinyls Pedricktown 1 13,333 Vinyl chloride 1000 ppbv Continuous Similar to M106 and M21 [continuous monitoring of air above cooling tower]PolyOne Henry 39000 5.93E+02 5.00E+03 1.56E+00 1.43

1 1,9002 1,850

Shintech Addis 449 9.40E-02 5.93E+00 5.00E+01 9.40E-02 0.00

Shintech Freeport 360Shintech Plaquemine 433Westlake Calvert City 1 23,000 [no data] 1.81E-01 5.93E+00 5.00E+01 1.81E-01 0.00

Westlake Geismar 1 10,653 Vinyl chloride 50 ppbw Yearly Method 107

1.19E+02 1.00E+03 3.47E+00 2.011.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.38E+01 9.541.62E+02 1.36E+03 6.73E-01 4.651.62E+02 1.36E+03 6.55E-01 4.531.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.59E-01 1.101.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.28E-01 8.811.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.53E-01 1.061.62E+02 1.36E+03 8.15E+00 5.635.93E+00 5.00E+01 1.39E-01 0.00

1.51E+02 1.16

CertainTeed Lake CharlesDow Midland 1 16,500Formosa Delaware CityGeorgia Gulf AberdeenGeorgia Gulf PlaquemineOxyVinyls Deer Park

1

PolyOne Pedricktown

8,400

2 1,200

OxyVinyls Pasadena

1 9,000

173 2 11,600
ATTACHMENT F- HEAT EXCHANGER ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Calculated Emissions, Reductions, and Costs

Total Capital Cost Total Annual C

Control Equip T&M $ $/yr 

Control Equip Capital 

Cost ($)

Testing 

and 

Monitoring 

Equip 

Capital 

Cost ($)

Control Equip 

Annualized 

Capital Cost 

($/yr)

Control Equipmen Annual Cost ($/yr)

Testing and 

Monitoring 

Equip 

Annualized 

Initial Cost 

($/yr)

Testing and 

Monitoring 

Annual Cost 

($/yr)

Total Capital 

Cost ($)

Total Annualiz

Cost ($/yr)

Certain Teed - Lake Charles Area Source Bulk 8.60

PolyOne - Henry PVC - Only Suspension, Dispersion, Suspension Blending 4.30PolyOne - Pedricktown PVC - Only Dispersion 8.60

Formosa - Delaware City PVC - Only Dispersion, Copolymer (VACO-D) 8.60

Dow - Midland PVC - Combined Copolymer (VDCO-S) 4.30

Formosa - Baton Rouge PVC - Combined Suspension 4.30Formosa - Point Comfort PVC - Combined Suspension 4.30

Georgia Gulf - Aberdeen PVC - Only Suspension 1.29

Georgia Gulf - Plaquemine PVC - Combined Suspension 1.72

OxyVinyls - Deer Park PVC - Combined Suspension 8.60

OxyVinyls - Pasadena PVC - Only Suspension 8.60OxyVinyls - Pedricktown PVC - Only Suspension 4.30

Shintech - Addis PVC - Only Suspension 4.30

Shintech - Freeport PVC - Only Suspension 4.30

Shintech - Plaquemine PVC - Combined Suspension 4.30

Westlake - Calvert City PVC - Combined Suspension 4.30Westlake - Geismar PVC - Combined Suspension 4.30

Control Equip T&M

MACT Floor Costs 

MACT Floor Capital Cost ($) MACT Floor - Annual Costs ($/yr) 

174
Attachment G 

GACT Analysis for Equipment Leaks 

175
ATTACHMENT G- EQUIPMENT LEAKS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Equipment Leaks Summary & Costs

RTI Equipment Leaks Options Cost Summary

Capital Costs Annualized Capital Costs Annual Costs Total Annualized Costs

Pumps - Option 1 2.23E+03  	 Valves - Option 1   
 
Connectors - Option 1 	 
 
 Total  
	  	

Cost Summary for PRD Monitoring Systems

CTLC  Cost Summary for Equipment Leaks

Company LDAR Program[1] (A) PRV Monitoring System Capital Cost ($) (B) Capital Cost Increase of LDAR ($) (C) Initial Record Keeping and Reporting (D) TCI ($) C=A+B+C 

 (E) Annualized 

Capital Cost 

Increase of 

LDAR 

 (F) Annual Increase 

in LDAR Cost 

 (G) Total 

Annualized Increase 

LDAR Cost

G=E+F 

 (H) Annualize 

Capital Cost of 

PRV Monitoring 

System ($) 

 (I) Annual 

Record Keeping 

and Reporting 

 (J) TAC ($

J=G+H+I 

Certain Teed - Lake Charles 40CFR61 V 1.13E+05 6.42E+04 2.62E+03 1.80E+05 9.17E+03 6.50E+03 1.57E+04 1.61E+04 4.49E+03 3.63E+OxyVinyls Deer Park 40CFR61 V 1.13E+05 6.42E+04 2.62E+03 1.80E+05 9.17E+03 6.50E+03 1.57E+04 1.61E+04 4.49E+03 3.63E+New Source Model 40CFR61 V 1.13E+05 6.42E+04 2.62E+03 1.80E+05 9.17E+03 6.50E+03 1.57E+04 1.61E+04 4.49E+03 3.63E+

Component

Source Type EPA PRD Monitoring Costs

176
	






Equipment Leaks Emissions

Type of Component Number of Components1 SubpartV Emission Factor (kg/hr/equipment) Subpart UU Emission Factor (kr/hr/equipment) Subpart V Emissions (Tons/yr) Subpart UU Emissions (Tons/yr) Emission Reduction (Tons/yr)

Pump Seals * Light-liquid service 15 2.51E-03 6.95E-04 3.49E-01 9.65E-02 2.52E-01 * Heavy-liquid service 0Valves * Gas/vapor service 762 3.52E-04 2.03E-04 2.48E+00 1.43E+00 1.05E+00 * Light-liquid service 153 3.90E-04 2.32E-04 5.53E-01 3.29E-01 2.24E-01 * Heavy-liquid service 0Connectors * Flanges - gas/vapor 0 3.07E-04 3.07E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * Flanges - light liquid 2,322 3.07E-04 1.62E-04 6.60E+00 3.48E+00 3.12E+00 * Flanges -heavy liquid 0Agitators * Light-liquid service 0 2.51E-03 2.51E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * Heavy-liquid service 0Pressure Relief Devices * Disks 2 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 * Disk holders, valves,etc. 2 NA NAOpen-ended Valves 33 3.33E-05 3.33E-05 1.02E-02 1.02E-02 0.00E+00Sampling Connections 8 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Compressor Vent 0 2.28E-02 2.28E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

Facility Total 1.00E+01 5.35E+00 4.64E+00

Equipment Counts from "Testing-Inspections-Environmental" "Re: Stratified data for 2008 monitoring" Bruce Brocka, Certain Teed Corp. Note that Flanges/Connectors were not Gas/Vapor or Light Liquid Specified - Assumed Light Liquid.

177
ATTACHMENT G- EQUIPMENT LEAKS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Equipment Leaks Subpart V Cost (Based on CTLC Equipment Counts)

Type of Component Number of Components

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

($/comp)

Initial LDAR 

Costs ($/yr) 

(Capital)

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs

Frequency of 

Monitoring 

(times/yr)

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

($/comp) or Charge (%)

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs ($/yr)

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs ($/yr)

Initial Leak Frequency 

(%)

Initial 

Number 

of Leaks

Subsequent 

Leak 

Frequency (%)

Annual 

Number 

of Leaks

Percent 

Repaired 

OnLine

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual 

OnLine Leak 

Repair Cost 

($/yr)

Percent 

Requiring 

Further Repair

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual Offline 

Leak Repair 

Cost ($/yr)

Monit

to V

Repa

Model 2 Pump Seals

 * Light-liquid service 1.50E+01 2.38E+01  1.20E+01 1.50E+00 5.80E+02 1.16E+02 2.42E+00 3.63E-01 2.29E-01 4.11E-01 1.00E+02 ###### ###### 4.36E+02 0.00E+00 ###### 6.62E+01 0.00E+00 6.1 * Heavy-liquid service 0.00E+00 1.10E+00 0.00E+00Valves * Gas/vapor service 7.62E+02 2.38E+01 	
 2.00E+00 1.50E+00 2.29E+03 3.34E-01 2.55E+00 3.34E-01 5.09E+00 7.50E+01 ###### ###### 4.22E+01 2.50E+01 ###### 6.62E+01 3.37E+02 7.64 * Light-liquid service 1.53E+02 2.38E+01 
	
 2.00E+00 1.50E+00 4.59E+02 3.34E-01 5.11E-01 3.34E-01 1.02E+00 7.50E+01 ###### ###### 8.48E+00 2.50E+01 ###### 6.62E+01 6.77E+01 1.53 * Heavy-liquid service 0.00E+00 1.10E+00 0.00E+00Connectors * Flanges - gas/vapor 0.00E+00 1.10E+00 0.00E+00 * Flanges - light liquid 2.32E+03 1.10E+00 2.56E+03 * Flanges -heavy liquid 0.00E+00 1.10E+00 0.00E+00Agitators * Light-liquid service 0.00E+00 2.38E+01 0.00E+00 1.20E+01 1.50E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.42E+00 0.00E+00 2.29E-01 0.00E+00 1.00E+02 ###### ###### 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 ###### 6.62E+01 0.00E+00 0.00 * Heavy-liquid service 0.00E+00 1.10E+00 0.00E+00Pressure Relief Devices * Disks 2.00E+00 1.22E+02 2.44E+02 0.00E+00 2.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.88E+00  * Disk holders, valves,etc. 2.00E+00 6.37E+03 1.27E+04 5.00E+00 6.37E+02 Open-ended Valves 3.30E+01 1.41E+02 4.65E+03 5.00E+00 2.33E+02 Sampling Connections 8.00E+00 6.88E+02 5.50E+03 5.00E+00 2.75E+02 Compressor Vent 0.00E+00 1.05E+04 0.00E+00 5.00E+00 0.00E+00 Replacement Pump Seals 1.50E+01 2.83E+02 1.03E+02Monitoring Instrument 1.00E+00 1.08E+04 1.08E+04Data Collection System 1.00E+00 1.45E+04 1.45E+04

hr/activity $/hr

Administrative and Reports 2.50E+02 9.27E+01 Planning and Training 3.20E+02 9.27E+01 2.97E+04TOTALS 7.39E+04 2.97E+04 3.33E+03 1.27E+03 4.87E+02 4.05E+02 1.77

Capital Costs 103,539

Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks 0.244

Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment 0.142

Annualized Capital Costs 14,738

Annual Expenses 29,700

Annual Fixed Costs ($/yr) 103,049 44,438

Annual Variable Costs ($/yr) 26,861

178
ATTACHMENT G- EQUIPMENT LEAKS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Equipment Leaks Pumps Option 1 Cost (Based on CTLC Equipment Counts)

Type of Component Number of Components

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

($/comp)

Initial LDAR 

Costs ($/yr) 

(Capital)

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs

Frequency of 

Monitoring 

(times/yr)

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

($/comp) or Charge (%)

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs ($/yr)

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs ($/yr)

Initial Leak Frequency 

(%)

Initial 

Number 

of Leaks

Subsequent 

Leak 

Frequency (%)

Annual 

Number 

of Leaks

Percent 

Repaired 

OnLine

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual 

OnLine Leak 

Repair Cost 

($/yr)

Percent 

Requiring 

Further Repair

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual Offline 

Leak Repair 

Cost ($/yr)

M

to 

R

Model 2 Pump Seals

 * Light-liquid service 1.50E+01 0.00E+00  1.20E+01 1.50E+00 1.55E+03 1.30E+02 1.35E+01 2.02E+00 2.56E-01 4.61E-01 1.00E+02 ###### ###### 4.89E+02 0.00E+00 ###### 6.62E+01 0.00E+00  * Heavy-liquid service 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Replacement Pump Seals 4.00E+01 2.83E+02 5.72E+02

hr/activity $/hr

Administrative and Reports 0.00E+00 9.27E+01 Planning and Training 0.00E+00 9.27E+01 0.00E+00TOTALS 2.72E+03 0.00E+00 1.55E+03 1.30E+02 4.89E+02 0.00E+00 1

Capital Costs 2.72E+03

Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks 2.44E-01

Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment 1.42E-01

Annualized Capital Costs 4.44E+02

Annual Expenses 2.27E+03

Baseline Monitoring

Type of Component Number of Components

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

($/comp)

Initial LDAR 

Costs ($/yr) 

(Capital)

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs

Frequency of 

Monitoring 

(times/yr)

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

($/comp) or Charge (%)

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs ($/yr)

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs ($/yr)

Initial Leak Frequency 

(%)

Initial 

Number 

of Leaks

Subsequent 

Leak 

Frequency (%)

Annual 

Number 

of Leaks

Percent 

Repaired 

OnLine

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual 

OnLine Leak 

Repair Cost 

($/yr)

Percent 

Requiring 

Further Repair

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual Offline 

Leak Repair 

Cost ($/yr)

M

to 

R

Model 2 Pump Seals

 * Light-liquid service 1.50E+01 0.00E+00 	 1.20E+01 1.50E+00 1.55E+03 1.16E+02 2.42E+00 3.63E-01 2.29E-01 4.11E-01 1.00E+02 ###### ###### 4.36E+02 0.00E+00 ###### 6.62E+01 0.00E+00  * Heavy-liquid service 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Replacement Pump Seals 4.00E+01 2.83E+02 1.03E+02

hr/activity $/hr

Administrative and Reports 0.00E+00 9.27E+01 Planning and Training 0.00E+00 9.27E+01 0.00E+00TOTALS 4.88E+02 0.00E+00 1.55E+03 1.16E+02 4.36E+02 0.00E+00 1

Monitoring Repair

Capital Costs 4.88E+02 4.88E+02

Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks 2.44E-01

Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment 1.42E-01

Annualized Capital Costs 7.98E+01 7.98E+01

Annual Expenses 2.19E+03 1.55E+03 5.52E+02

Incremental Capital Costs 2.23E+03

Incremental Annual Costs 4.43E+02

179
ATTACHMENT G- EQUIPMENT LEAKS ANALYSIS 

02/09/2012

Equipment Leaks Valves Option 1 Cost (Based on CTLC Equipment Counts)

Type of Component Number of Components

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

($/comp)

Initial LDAR 

Costs ($/yr) 

(Capital)

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs

Frequency of 

Monitoring 

(times/yr)

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

($/comp) or Charge (%)

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs ($/yr)

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs ($/yr)

Initial Leak Frequency 

(%)

Initial 

Number of 

Leaks

Subsequent 

Leak 

Frequency (%)

Annual 

Number of 

Leaks

Percent 

Repaired 

OnLine

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual 

OnLine 

Leak 

Repair 

Cost ($/yr)

Percent 

Requiring 

Further 

Repair

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual Of

Leak Re

Cost ($/

Model 2 Valves

 * Gas/vapor service 7.62E+02 0.00E+00  2.00E+00 1.50E+00 2.29E+03 7.24E+00 5.52E+01 5.06E-01 7.71E+00 7.50E+01 1.67E-01 6.62E+01 6.40E+01 2.50E+01 4.00E+00 6.62E+01 5.11E * Light-liquid service 1.53E+02 0.00E+00 	 2.00E+00 1.50E+00 4.59E+02 4.84E+00 7.41E+00 5.06E-01 1.55E+00 7.50E+01 1.67E-01 6.62E+01 1.28E+01 2.50E+01 4.00E+00 6.62E+01 1.03E * Heavy-liquid service 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

hr/activity $/hr

Administrative and Reports 0.00E+00 9.27E+01 Planning and Training 0.00E+00 9.27E+01 0.00E+00TOTALS 4.76E+03 0.00E+00 2.75E+03 0.00E+00 7.68E+01 6.13E

Capital Costs 4.76E+03

Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks 2.44E-01

Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment 1.42E-01

Annualized Capital Costs 6.76E+02

Annual Expenses 3.45E+03

Baseline Monitoring

Type of Component Number of Components

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

($/comp)

Initial LDAR 

Costs ($/yr) 

(Capital)

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs

Frequency of 

Monitoring 

(times/yr)

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

($/comp) or Charge (%)

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs ($/yr)

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs ($/yr)

Initial Leak Frequency 

(%)

Initial 

Number of 

Leaks

Subsequent 

Leak 

Frequency (%)

Annual 

Number of 

Leaks

Percent 

Repaired 

OnLine

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual 

OnLine 

Leak 

Repair 

Cost ($/yr)

Percent 

Requiring 

Further 

Repair

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual Of

Leak Re

Cost ($/

Model 2 Valves

 * Gas/vapor service 7.62E+02 0.00E+00 
 2.00E+00 1.50E+00 2.29E+03 3.34E-01 2.55E+00 3.34E-01 5.09E+00 7.50E+01 1.67E-01 6.62E+01 4.22E+01 2.50E+01 4.00E+00 6.62E+01 3.37E * Light-liquid service 1.53E+02 0.00E+00 
 2.00E+00 1.50E+00 4.59E+02 3.34E-01 5.11E-01 3.34E-01 1.02E+00 7.50E+01 1.67E-01 6.62E+01 8.48E+00 2.50E+01 4.00E+00 6.62E+01 6.77E * Heavy-liquid service 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

hr/activity $/hr

Administrative and Reports 0.00E+00 9.27E+01 Planning and Training 0.00E+00 9.27E+01 0.00E+00TOTALS 2.32E+02 0.00E+00 2.75E+03 0.00E+00 5.07E+01 4.05E

Capital Costs 2.32E+02

Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks 2.44E-01

Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment 1.42E-01

Annualized Capital Costs 3.30E+01

Annual Expenses 3.21E+03

Incremental Capital Costs 4.53E+03Incremental Annual Costs 8.82E+02

180
	






Equipment Leaks Connectors Option 1 Cost (Based on CTLC Equipment Counts)

Type of Component Number of Components

Initial 

Monitoring Fee 

or Unit Cost 

($/comp)

Initial LDAR 

Costs ($/yr) 

(Capital)

Initial LDAR 

Admin. 

Costs

Frequency of 

Monitoring 

(times/yr)

Subsequent 

Monitoring Fee 

($/comp) or Charge (%)

Annual 

Monitoring 

Costs ($/yr)

Annual 

Maintenance 

Costs ($/yr)

Initial Leak Frequency 

(%)

Initial 

Number of 

Leaks

Subsequent 

Leak 

Frequency (%)

Annual 

Number of 

Leaks

Percent 

Repaired 

OnLine

Repair 

Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annual 

OnLine Leak 

Repair Cost 

($/yr)

Percent 

Requiring 

Further Repair

Repair Time 

(hours)

Labor 

Charge 

($/hr)

Annu

Leak 

Cos

Model 2 Connectors

 * Flanges - gas/vapor 0.00E+00 2.38E+01 0.00E+00 2.00E-01 2.50E+00 0.00E+00 3.60E-01 0.00E+00 3.60E-01 0.00E+00 7.50E+01 1.67E-01 6.62E+01 0.00E+00 2.50E+01 2.00E+00 6.62E+01 0 * Flanges - light liquid 2.32E+03 2.38E+01 5.56E+04 2.50E-01 2.50E+00 1.45E+03 3.60E-01 8.36E+00 3.60E-01 2.09E+00 7.50E+01 1.67E-01 6.62E+01 1.73E+01 2.50E+01 2.00E+00 6.62E+01 6 * Flanges -heavy liquid 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

hr/activity $/hr

Administrative and Reports 5.00E+01 9.27E+01 Planning and Training 2.00E+01 9.27E+01 1.85E+03

1.45E+03 0.00E+00 1.73E+01 6

TOTALS 5.56E+04 1.85E+03 1.45E+03 0.00E+00 1.73E+01 6

Capital Costs 5.75E+04

Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks 2.44E-01

Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment 1.42E-01

Annualized Capital Costs 8.16E+03

Annual Expenses 6.18E+03

181
Attachment H 

GACT Analysis for Other Emission Sources 

182
ATTACHMENT H- OTHER EMISSION SOURCES ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Other Emission Sources

Calculated GACT Baseline

Emission Source Existing Source New Source Notes

Reactor Openings Subpart F Subpart F

Gas Holders No Control No Control No Gas Holders at Existing Area Sources 

Existing and New Source GACT Summary for Other Emission Sources

Emission Source Existing Source 

GACT Limit

Option 1 Limit (Existing 

Source Requirements)

Emissions Reductions as a Result of 

Option 1 Complaince (tons/yr)

Reactor Openings Subpart F Subpart F -

Gas Holders No Control Floating Objects 

	






Cost Component CTLC OVDP Model New Facility





	

	




 

	


	
	

	

   



   ! 





		 



 !"#"

		
	


 "

		

	
	

	

   


 "" ""   

183
	












Other Emission Sources - Reactor Opening Emissions

Total VOC Vinyl Chloride Methanol Total VOC Vinyl Chloride Methanol Total Organic HAP Company 

CertainTeed Lake Charles B Reactor Openings 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 CertainTeed Dow Midland S 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 Dow Dow (Union Carbide) Texas City SL Filter Openings 8.81E-01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 8.81E-01 6.78E+01 Dow (Union Carbide) Formosa Baton Rouge S Filter Openings 1.03E+02 1.03E+02 1.03E+02 1.03E+02 0.00E+00 1.03E+02 Formosa Formosa Baton Rouge S Reactor Openings 8.62E+01 8.62E+01 8.62E+01 8.62E+01 0.00E+00 8.62E+01 Formosa Formosa Baton Rouge S Vessel Openings 1.03E+02 1.03E+02 1.03E+02 1.03E+02 0.00E+00 1.03E+02 Formosa Formosa Deleware City D Reactor Openings 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Formosa Formosa Point Comfort - PVC Unit S Filter Openings 1.60E-01 1.60E-01 1.60E-01 1.60E-01 0.00E+00 1.60E-01 Formosa Formosa Point Comfort - PVC Unit S Reactor Openings 2.13E+02 2.13E+02 2.13E+02 2.13E+02 0.00E+00 2.13E+02 Formosa Formosa Point Comfort - PVC Unit S Stripping Column 1.90E+00 1.90E+00 1.90E+00 1.90E+00 0.00E+00 1.90E+00 Formosa Formosa Point Comfort - PVC Unit S Vessel Openings 9.96E+00 9.96E+00 9.96E+00 9.96E+00 0.00E+00 9.96E+00 Formosa Georgia Gulf Aberdeen S Vessel Openings 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 Georgia Gulf Georgia Gulf Plaquemine S Reactor Openings 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 Georgia Gulf OxyVinyls Deer Park S Filter Openings 5.50E-03 5.50E-03 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Deer Park S Foam Trap 5.70E-02 5.70E-02 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Deer Park S Reactor Openings 3.03E+01 3.03E+01 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Deer Park S Stripping Column 3.04E-01 3.04E-01 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Deer Park S Vessel Openings 1.01E+00 1.01E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Deer Park S Waste Water Stripper 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pasadena S Condensers 1.90E-01 1.90E-01 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pasadena S Filter Openings 4.70E-02 4.70E-02 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pasadena S Reactor Openings 8.23E+00 8.23E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pasadena S Vessel Openings 2.61E+01 1.00E-02 2.61E+01 1.00E-02 0.00E+00 1.00E-02 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pasadena S Wash Columns 8.60E-01 8.60E-01 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pedricktown S Filter Openings 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pedricktown S Reactor Openings 4.89E+00 4.89E+00 4.89E+00 4.89E+00 0.00E+00 4.89E+00 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pedricktown S Recovery Separators 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pedricktown S Stripping Column 4.89E+00 4.89E+00 4.89E+00 4.89E+00 0.00E+00 4.89E+00 OxyVinyls OxyVinyls Pedricktown S Vessel Openings 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 OxyVinyls PolyOne Henry S, D Reactor Openings 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 PolyOne PolyOne Pedricktown D Reactor Openings 7.69E+03 5.49E+05 4.00E-02 4.00E-02 0.00E+00 4.00E-02 PolyOne PolyOne Pedricktown D Vessel Openings 3.58E-02 3.58E-02 3.58E-02 3.58E-02 0.00E+00 3.58E-02 PolyOne Shintech Addis S Reactor Openings 1.33E+01 1.33E+01 1.33E+01 1.33E+01 0.00E+00 1.33E+01 Shintech Shintech Freeport S Reactor Openings 3.90E+02 0.00E+00 3.90E+02 0.00E+00 3.90E+02 Shintech Shintech Freeport S Storage Sphere 5.11E+00 0.00E+00 5.11E+00 0.00E+00 5.11E+00 Shintech Shintech Plaquemine S Reactor Openings 5.00E+02 5.00E+02 5.00E+02 5.00E+02 0.00E+00 5.00E+02 Shintech Westlake Calvert City S Reactor Openings 1.78E+02 1.78E+02 1.78E+02 1.78E+02 0.00E+00 1.78E+02 Westlake Westlake Calvert City S Stripping Column 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 0.00E+00 2.72E+00 Westlake Westlake Calvert City S Vessel Openings 3.00E-03 3.00E-03 3.00E-03 3.00E-03 0.00E+00 3.00E-03 Westlake Westlake Geismar S Reactor Openings 1.05E+02 1.05E+02 1.05E+02 1.05E+02 0.00E+00 1.05E+02 Westlake * Excluded: compressors, pumps, exchangers. Average of Reported Emissions >0 lb/yr** PolyOne included with dispersion. Bulk 0.00E+00 6.69E+01 0.00E+00 Bulk 0.00E+00 3.35E-02 0.00E+00 3.35E-02*** Dow - Midland added; no emissions reported from equipment openings. Dispersion 3.58E-02 3.58E-02 0.00E+00 Dispersion 3.79E-05 3.35E-02 0.00E+00 3.35E-02

All Other 5.57E+01 1.01E+02 8.81E-01 All Other 6.96E-01 1.40E+00 0.00E+00 1.40E+00Reported values from PolyOne - Pedricktown excluded. TOTAL 6.96E-01 1.46E+00 0.00E+00 1.46E+00

Average value applied to PolyOne - Pedricktown

0.6960

Total 2008 Emissions (lbs)

Company Facility Process Equipment

Total 2008 Emissions (lbs)

184
ATTACHMENT H- OTHER EMISSION SOURCES ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Other Emission Sources - Gas Holders

 	


  	 		
 	 


#$
%	
 & '())*)+ ,(-.*)- '(')*)- &(/.*)+ 	



&'23
4&		25
& 
23
6
	25


7
)(..

8$9#3
2
23
	
+(+(5
2:-(), !"

2;<- ='9))) 
23





	

2<- 4)>?@


	"- =+9)))

Option 1 Limit (Existing Source Requirements)

Table B.2 Total Capital Investment and Total Annualized Cost Estimate: Flow Indicator - Gas Phase

Component Equation Cost ($)

Capital and Other Initial CostsTotal Capital Investment ($2011) TCI 5.00E+03

Annualized CostsMaintenance and repairs3 O&M=.07*TCI 3.50E+02Taxes, Insurance3 TI=0.04*TCI 2.00E+02Interest Rate3 i 7.00E-02

Equipment Life3 (years) n 7.00E+00Capital Recovery Factor4 CRF=(i*(1+i)n)/((1+i)n-1) 1.86E-01

Capital Recovery4 CR=CFR*TCI 9.28E+02Total Annualized Costs ($/yr) ($2011) TAC=O&M+TI+CR 1.48E+03

LOW HIGH

Area Source VCM Removed (ton/yr) (ton per gas holder)*(%Reduction) 6.16E-01 2.31E+00

References1 - Comments Of The Vinyl Institute, Inc., PVC Mact Working Group. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-00372 - Krock, Richard P. Memorandum to Ms. Jodi Howard. "Vinyl Institute Response to EPA Request for Additional Information on Work Practices for Gasholders at PVC Resin Manufacturing Facilities." September 22, 20113 - Peters, Timmerhaus, and West. "Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers." Fifth Edition. McGraw Hill. New York, NY. 2003. pg. 2684 - U.S. EPA. "Air Pollution Control Cost Manual." Sixth Edition (EPA/452/B-02-001). January 2002 pg 2-21

185
Attachment I 

Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost Estimation for Area Sources

186
	

	
			



  

 !" #!$!% ! "!&"' "!&"' !(!)*+,- !. #!$!+!%  /!0' /!0' !(!)1#-2#- !./ #!$!% ! .!'". .!'". !(!)3456-7#8 !" #!$!% !" &!&'" &!&'" !(!)!9-*#),: !/ #!%  !.'& !.'& !(!)#-;+9#)<-6 !/ #!$!% 0! &!&'" &!&'" !(!)-9*4+ !/ #!%  !.'& !.'& !(!) 	
 	
 	

 	

# 7#$**7#$**--*=#%%-#%4:346-=%>%%$<.6*5*-$ 	-#:(*6#+-#65:)5*-+ -#$:96-*(*5#-)5##6-#%6*-*)5:#% 5*-55##-*(*-6''?"%>%%$<.6*5*- *%+#65:)--)#%6*-*)@*-#55:+#$:(*5*+>-<#A( ##%+:4%-6''0#%''"%>%%$<.6*5*-) 	<##%!+*%85)-64%/'
#+:4%%9 +:4%#4#::#$*+*-(*
6*-*)<-6

+*%5)#%5*-)B4%B<6**-

6**- 	-#:*- @ A 	-#:*- 4#:*-@ <A 4#:*-

187
Attachment J 

Storage Vessel Information Provided in Facility Survey 

188
ATTACHMENT J- STORAGE VESSELS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Storage - Baseline Emissions

Baseline Emissions Analysis for Storage Tanks

Total VOC Total Organic HAP Vinyl Chloride Total VOC Total Organic HAP Vinyl Chloride 

CertainTeed Lake Charles B 2.00E-01 2.00E-01 2.00E-01 2.00E-01 0.00E+00 Formosa Delaware City D 7.06E+02 7.06E+02 7.06E+02 7.06E+02 0.00E+00 PolyOne Henry D 7.06E+02 7.06E+02 0.00E+00 PolyOne Pedricktown D 7.06E+02 7.06E+02 0.00E+00 Dow Midland S 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Dow (Union Carbide) Texas City SL 7.20E+02 7.20E+02 7.20E+02 7.20E+02 6.72E+02 Formosa Baton Rouge S 2.01E+03 2.44E+03 2.01E+03 2.44E+03 6.72E+02 Formosa Point Comfort - PVC S 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Georgia Gulf Aberdeen S 1.02E+03 9.85E+02 6.72E+02 Georgia Gulf Plaquemine S 1.02E+03 9.85E+02 6.72E+02 OxyVinyls Deer Park S 1.02E+03 9.85E+02 6.72E+02 OxyVinyls Pasadena S 1.02E+03 9.85E+02 6.72E+02 OxyVinyls Pedricktown S 1.02E+03 9.85E+02 6.72E+02 Shintech Addis S 2.58E+03 2.12E+03 1.80E+03 2.58E+03 2.12E+03 1.80E+03 Shintech Freeport S 1.31E+03 4.03E+02 1.31E+03 4.03E+02 6.72E+02 Shintech Plaquemine S 4.20E+02 1.80E+02 1.80E+02 4.20E+02 1.80E+02 1.80E+02 Westlake Calvert City S 9.60E-02 0.00E+00 9.60E-02 0.00E+00 6.72E+02 Westlake Geismar S 7.36E+01 4.65E+01 3.94E+01 7.36E+01 4.65E+01 3.94E+01 

Average of Reported Emissions >0 lb/yr Totals in Tons per YearBulk 2.00E-01 2.00E-01 0.00E+00 Bulk 1.00E-04 1.00E-04 0.00E+00Dispersion 7.06E+02 7.06E+02 0.00E+00 Dispersion 1.06E+00 1.06E+00 0.00E+00All Other 1.02E+03 9.85E+02 6.72E+02 All Other 5.74E+00 5.06E+00 3.70E+00

TOTAL 6.80E+00 6.12E+00 3.70E+00 

* PolyOne - Henry included in dispersion category.

** Average of reported emissions grater than zero for each category applied to facilities in that category that did noreport emissions.*** Certain Teed did not report a value for Vinyl Chloride - Since there are no other bulk facilities, a value of zero was assumed

Company Facility Process Reported Emissions, lb/yr Baseline Emissions, lb/yr

189