See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen deny i ng r el i ef , t he co ur t m ayhan d down an opi ni on b uti s not 1 re q u i re d to d o s o .”); T EX . R. A PP . P
. 47
. 4 (di s t i ng ui s hi ng op i ni on s an d m em ora nd um op i ni on s ). 

### NU M BER 13- 08- 0043 7-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I — E DI NBURG IN R E IG N AC IO V IL LA R R EA LC A N T U , F ER N A N D O VI L LA R R EA LC A N T U , C ON SU EL O VI L LA R R EA LC A N T U ,

A ND M A RTHA

GUA DA LUPE VILLA RREA L CA NTU On Peti tion for Wr it of M andamus M EM ORA ND UM OPIN ION Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd Ve la M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam 1 Rel ators, Ig naci o Vi ll ar re al Can tu, Fer nando Vi ll ar re al Can tu, Con suelo Vil lar re al Can tu, and Mar

tha Guadal upe Vil lar re al Ca ntu, file d a peti ti on for w ri t of mandamus and m o ti o n fo r em e rge n cy te m p o ra ry reli e f o n Ju ly 14 , 2 0 0 8 . T h ro u gh t h is o rigin a l p ro ce e d in g, re lat ors s eek to c omp e l th e tr ial co urt t o v acat e v ar iou s o rd ers p ertai nin g to the g uardia nshi p of Ra q uel C antu de Vi ll ar re al, an i ncapa ci tated person.T hi s m ot i on forext ensi on of t i m e w as m i st akenl yf i l ed i n cau se nu m ber13- 08- 00408 , a r el at ed 2 a p p e a l i n th i s C o u rt. See I n the G uardianshi p of R aquel C ant u D e Vi

llar real , an I ncapacitat ed Per son , N o. 1 3 -0 8 -0 0 4 0 8 -C V
. 2 On J uly 15, 2008, thi s Cou rt g ra nted the moti on for emerg ency temporar y re li ef and ordered al l proceed ing s in the tri al cour t stayed. The C our

t furt her req uest ed th at t he real par ti es in int erest file a respon se to t he pet it ion for w ri t of mandamus w it hin ten days. That same day , re al par

ti es in int erest , Raq uel Vi ll ar re al, Ma rc elo Vi ll ar re al, and Carlos Vi ll ar re al, fil ed a moti on for re cons ide ra ti on of the sta y , w hic h was deni ed by the Cou rton J u ly 1 7 , 2 0 0 8
. O n Ju ly 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 , t h e s e sa m e p a rt ie s f il e d a n “E m e rg e n cy Mo t io n fo r L e a ve to D eter mine Mo ti on to D is q ual ify and Remove Gua rd ian and to C o mpel Dep osi t of Mi sappl ied F unds to t he Tr ial C our t’ s o r thi s C our

t’ s R e gist ry”. On J uly

28, 2008, re al partie s also f iled a mo tion for extension o f time to f ile their respon se to th e pe tition for w rit of man dam us. 2 The Co urt, hav ing ex amined and fully co nsi dered th e pet it ion for w ri t of mandamus and furt her

pleadi ng s f il ed herei n, is of the opi nio n tha t rela tors h av e notsh ow n the msel v es ent itled to the re li e f

s o u gh t . Accordingly , the stay previously impo sed b y

this Court is L IF T ED
. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P
. 5 2
. 1 0 ( b )( " U n l e s s v a c a t e d o r m o d i fi e d , a n o rd e r

g ra n t i ng temporar

y reli ef is effect ive unt il the cas e i s fin all y dec ide d.")
. The emerg ency m oti on for leave and the m otion for extension o f time f iled by the real parties in inte rest, are DI SM ISSE D as moot, a s are any othe r pendi ng moti ons. The pe ti ti on for w ri t of mandamus isD EN IED
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8( a)
. P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s 3 0th d ay

of Jul y , 200 8.