alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, INC. and Communications Patents, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UA-COLUMBIA CABLEVISION OF WESTCHESTER, INC. and Telecommunications, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants.

Nos. 02-1248, 02-1249.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 31, 2002.

Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Intellectual Property Development, Inc. and Communications Patents, Ltd. submit a letter informing this court that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has denied the parties’ joint motion to enter an appealable judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). We sua sponte consider whether these appeals must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

On January 3, 2002, the district court issued an order that construed a claim and held that the patent was infringed and invalid. The district court ordered that case closed, but later acknowledged that it had erred in closing the ease because there was a pending counterclaim regarding inequitable conduct. The district court determined that the counterclaim should be adjudicated and denied the parties’ joint motion to enter an appealable judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), regarding the claims related to infringement and invalidity.

In the recent letter to this court, the appellants state that they believe that the district court’s previous order, closing the case but not disposing of a pending counterclaim regarding inequitable conduct, was appealable. We disagree. Pursuant to the express terms of Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), in the absence of a determination that “there is no just reason for delay and ... an express direction for the entry of judgment,” any order or other form of decision, “however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all of the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties.... ” Thus, because the district court denied the parties’ motion to direct the entry of judgment under this rule, there is no appealable judgment and the appeals filed by the parties must be dismissed, notwithstanding their desire to have their appeals heard. *Spraytex, Inc. v. DJS & T,*96 F.3d 1377 (Fed.Cir. 1996); *W.L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Inter*
      *471
      *national Medical Prosthetics Research*As-socs., 975 F.2d 858 (Fed.Cir.1992). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) These appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 66253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33233]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 243 / Thursday, December 18, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 66253]]


                Presidential Determination No. 98-7 of December 5, 1997

                
Presidential Determination Under Subsections 
                402(a) and 409(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
                Amended--Emigration Policies of Albania, Kazakhstan, 
                Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by subsections 
                402(a) and 409(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
                2432(a) and 2439(a) (the ``Act'')), I determine that 
                Albania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, 
                Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan are not in violation of 
                paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection 402(a) of the 
                Act, or paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection 409(a) 
                of the Act.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 5, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-33233
Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

ACTION: Notice of Approved Amendment to Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988, Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved amendments 
to Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III 
(casino) gaming on Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian 
Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, 
has approved Amendment IV to the Gaming Compact Between the 
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and the State of 
Oregon, which was executed on September 3, 1997.

DATES: This action is effective December 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas H. Hartman, Acting Director, 
Indian Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, 
D.C. 20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
Michael J. Anderson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-31918 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-12-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33019]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,479]

G.E. Medical Systems Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Notice of Negative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated November 3, 1997, the X-Ray Lodge No. 1916 of 
the International Association of Machinists requested administrative 
reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding 
worker eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance. The denial 
notice, applicable to workers of G.E. Medical Systems producing medical 
diagnostic imaging equipment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, was signed on 
October 9, 1997 and published in the Federal Register on November 5, 
1997 (62 FR 59882).
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The petitioners assert that products produced by workers of the 
subject firm are now being produced in foreign countries by their 
suppliers and add that a large percentage of the subject firm sales 
come from the offshore market.
    The TAA petition investigation for workers of the subject firm 
showed that the criterion (2) of the Group Eligibility requirements of 
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was not met. Sales 
and production at the subject firm increased in 1996 compared to 1995 
and in January-April of 1997 compared to the same time period in 1996.
    The petitioner's assertion regarding company sales of imported 
diagnostic imaging equipment was addressed in the negative 
determination applicable to workers of G.E. Medical Systems in 
Milwaukee.
    As specified in the group eligibility requirements of criterion (3) 
of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the Department 
must establish that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles produced at the workers' firm, contributed to 
worker separations.

Conclusion

    After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 11th day of December 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-33019 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
#### Ronald KOHN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1225.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1974.

*49Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proen-za & Richman and Andrew C. Hall, Miami, Bernstein, Robrish & Harrington, Coconut Grove, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J. and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant was charged with possession of cocaine -and possession of cannabis in an amount greater than five grams, both felonies. After plea bargaining negotiations had been conducted with the state, the appellant plead guilty to possession of cocaine, a felony, and possession of cannabis, as a misdemeanor. Following a presen-tence investigation, the trial court sentenced appellant to six months incarceration in the county jail followed by one year on probation.

Thereafter, appellant filed a motion to mitigate the sentence, which the trial judge denied. At the hearing on the motion to mitigate and prior' to appellant’s entry of his guilty plea, the trial judge clearly stated that he would not be bound by the state or police in imposing sentence. Now, appellant argues that the trial court erred by imposing a sentence more severe than contemplated by the state or the appellant. He contends that his guilty plea was induced by promises of the state that in consideration for appellant’s cooperation with the police he would receive a sentence of probation only.

However, the record in this cause reflects that appellant’s guilty plea was made voluntarily. Our Supreme Court in Costello v. State, Fla. 1972, 260 So.2d 198 anticipated situations such as is presented in this case as follows:

> “Defendants who plead guilty and are given a stiffer sentence than they anticipated cannot automatically expect to receive another try at a lighter sentence. It is not enough for a defendant to argue that he was under an impression that a promise of a lesser penalty had been made by the judge or prosecutor. A reasonable basis for such an impression must be shown ...”

We do note, however, that the sentence in this case is not free from error. The point was not raised in the briefs, but *50this court sua sponte, and in the interest of justice, may consider the legality of the sentence. Williams v. State, Fla.App.1973, 280 So.2d, 518; FAR 6.16, 32 F.S.A.

This court has held quite succinctly that a designated sentence to the county jail followed by a period of probation is not. authorized by Fla.Stat. § 948.01(4), F. S.A. See Williams v. State, supra; Hutchins v. State, Fla.App., 286 So.2d 244, opinion filed November 6, 1973; Cleveland v. State, Fla.App., 287 So.2d 347, opinion filed December 4, 1973. Accordingly, the provision in the sentence for probation must be stricken, and the sentence as modified is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 77 (Tuesday, April 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 22492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09137]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9909-84-OA]

Notification of a Correction Regarding a Public Teleconference of 
the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) Ozone Review Panel

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science Advisory 
Board (SAB) Staff Office published a notice in the Federal Register on 
April 9, 2014, concerning a public teleconference of the Clean Air 
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) and the CASAC Ozone Review Panel. 
The notice contained an incorrect date and time of the teleconference.
    In the Federal Register of April 9, 2014, in 79 FR 19613 in the 
second column, correct the DATES caption to read:

DATES: If additional time is needed following the May 28, 2013, 
teleconference, CASAC and the CASAC Panel will hold a teleconference on 
Wednesday, June 4, 2014, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holly Stallworth, Designated Federal 
Officer, 202-564-2073.

    Dated: April 16, 2014.
Thomas H. Brennan,
Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-09137 Filed 4-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### CITY OF MIAMI, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Harry LENCHNER, Appellee.

No. 73-681.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Norma Langhof, wife of/and Ricky David MEEK v. CLEARVIEW DODGE SALES, INC., Credithrift of America # 2, Inc. and Chrysler Corporation.

No. 61457.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

In re: Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc. applying for writs of certiorari, review, prohibition and mandamus. Jefferson Parish.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) of OFS Capital
Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert S. Palmer, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Robert S. PalmerName:

Robert S. PalmerDate:

March 26, 2013
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32857]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 922

[Docket No. 960712192-6192-01]
RIN 0648-AD85

Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Final Regulations

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final regulations 
which were published Thursday, January 30, 1997 (62 FR 4578). The 
regulations pertain to the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and 
made revisions to the national marine sanctuary program regulations at 
15 CFR Part 922.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 17, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Weiss (301) 713-2969, ext. 
216.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Final regulations for the Florida Keys 
National Marine Sanctuary were published on Thursday, January 30, 1997 
(62 FR 4578). These regulations were subsequently amended on June 12, 
1997 (62 FR 32154). The January 30, 1997 Federal Register document made 
revisions to the national marine sanctuary program regulations at 15 
CFR Part 922. The January 30, 1997 Federal Register document that is 
the subject of this correction contains amendatory language for 
Sec. 922.48(b) of the national marine sanctuary program regulations, 
which pertains to national marine sanctuary permits. The amendatory 
instruction for paragraph (b) of section 922.48 was incorrect by 
failing to state that only the introductory language to paragraph (b) 
was amended, thus leaving the remaining subparagraphs to paragraph (b) 
unchanged. Left uncorrected, the amendatory language would erroneously 
result in subparagraphs (1) through (5) of paragraph 922.48(b) being 
deleted from the Code of Federal Regulations.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the Federal Register document published on January 30, 
1997 (62 FR 4578) is corrected by revising amendatory instruction 14 on 
page 4607, third column, to read as follows:
    ``14. Section 922.48 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and the 
introductory text of paragraph (b) as follows:''
Nancy Foster,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management.
[FR Doc. 97-32857 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-P
```
Exhibit 32(b)


               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Mark E. Maddocks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



March 12, 2009            /s/ Mark E. Maddocks
                         _____________________________________
                         Mark E. Maddocks
                         Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Dataram Corporation and will be retained by Dataram
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee (TTAC) 

Public Meeting

December 9, 2020

1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.

via teleconference Call- in Number: 1 888 455-7136 or 

1 773 799 3680

Participant Code 1776915

Conference Number 1865890

 Agenda

Designated Federal Officer Krishna Vallabhaneni

Chairperson Lacey Horn

Call to Order

Roll Call by Chairperson Horn

Tribal Opening

Approval of Minutes from September 16, 2020 Meeting

2020 Year-end Review

TTAC Committee Updates and Action

Subcommittee Updates

• General Welfare Exclusion Act 

• Dual Taxation

• Tribal Pensions 

Public Comments

Recommendations 

Other Items 

▪ Employer Retention Credit Update

▪ Establish 2021 Public Meeting Dates

Closing Business

Adjourn
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of DE Acquisition 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis Nguyen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Dennis Nguyen

Dennis Nguyen

Principal Executive Officer

May 31, 2011
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-170414) pertaining to the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Deferred Compensation Plan Amended and RestatedEffective March 1, 2010 of The Fresh Market, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of The Fresh Market, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010and the one month period ended January 30, 2011. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Greensboro, North Carolina 

March 22, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ROBERTO CALDERON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 358 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Aug. 14, 2012 Report Request ID: 1012178 Report Code: AMP430

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:FMC

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 04 023 0004 88101 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS OZONE EVALUATION AGENCY ROLE MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value SEASONAL-HOURLY REPORTING YES SORT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

EPA_REGION STATE_CODE MONITOR_TYPE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID PARAMETER_CODE POC GLOBAL DATES 2011 Start Date End Date 2011 1 12 Tribal CodeAug. 14, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 1 of 4 MONITORS NOT REPORTINGAug. 14, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 2 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality SLAMS JAN. 01, 2011 DEC. 31, 2011

THRU SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT 04-023-0004 88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions 17 Nogales 300 N MORLEY AVE 143 5 100% 3

60% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 5

100% 6 100% 5 100% 5

100% 5 100% 5 100% 59

97% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Aug. 14, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 3 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality QA COLLOCATED JAN. 01, 2011 DEC. 31, 2011

THRU SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT 04-023-0004 88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions 2 7 Nogales 300 N MORLEY AVE 143 5 100% 5

100% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 5

100% 5

83% 1 20% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 56

92% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Aug. 14, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 4 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: MONITOR TYPE:

Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality SLAMS QA COLLOCATED JAN. 01, 2011 DEC. 31, 2011

THRU

PARAMETER PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS 88101 88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions

PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 1 0 0 1 1 97.0% 92.0% 1 1 0 0 1 1 97.0% 92.0% 2 0 2 94.5% 2 0 2 94.5% 2 0 2 94.5% 2 0 2 94.5% Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality Arizona REGION SUMMARY:(09) SAN FRANCISCO REPORT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY:SLAMS

QA COLLOCATED REPORT SUMMARY STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY: