alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-077-CV

DAVID SCOT LYND	APPELLANT	

	V.

NORTHWOOD MHC, L.P. D/B/A NORTHWOOD	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 158th DISTRICT COURT OF  DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On May 7, 2008, this court issued an order affirming the trial court’s order sustaining a contest to appellant’s affidavit of inability to pay because, after reviewing the record from the trial court’s hearing on the contest, we concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion because the evidence supported the trial court’s order sustaining the contest.  Appellant subsequently filed a motion for rehearing that was denied without opinion on May 22, 2008.  	On June 10, 2008, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid on or before June 20, 2008.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee.2  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,3 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:  June 26, 2008
#### Felix OLMOS, Petitioner, v. CURTIS ROBINSON EXCAVATING, et al., Respondents.

No. 44358.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 21, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors Reinhold Industries, Inc.



We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-39925
on Form S-8 of Reinhold  Industries,  Inc. of our report dated  January 29, 1999
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Reinhold  Industries,  Inc. as of
December  31,  1998  and  1997  and  the  related  consolidated   statements  of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 which reports appears in the December 31,
1998 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Reinhold Industries, Inc..



/S/ KPMG LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 26, 1999
#### CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, etc. v. Carl MURPHY, Jr.

No. 50690.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 23, 1978.

Mitchell, McNutt, Bush, Lagrone & Sams, William C. Murphree, Tupelo, for appellant.

Jimmy D. Shelton, Billy W. Shelton, Tu-pelo, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; Fred Wicker, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 21, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23

- 0586

Lower Tribunal No. F16

- 4938

________________



### Ford Charlier

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from

the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz , Judge.

Ford Charlier

, in proper person.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, an d Richard L. Polin , Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and GORDO , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Public Statements Tagged with Credit Reporting No results found for this tag.
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
#### 

#### **FINANCIAL DISTRESS CERTIFICATION**

*This form is to be used if the applicant, or anyone in the applicant’s household qualified for unemployment benefits, experienced a significant decrease of income or increase in household expenses, or financial hardship, due directly, or indirectly, to the COVID-19 outbreak.*

The applicant(s) certifies that one or more members of the household has either 

· Qualified for unemployment benefits, 

or 

· experienced a reduction of income, or 

· incurred a significant increase of household expenses, or 

· experienced other financial hardships

due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Please provide a statement as to the nature of your household’s financial distress. 

 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________                               

**WARNING: *The information provided on this form is subject to verification at any time, and Title 18, Section 1001 of the U.S. Code states that a person is guilty of a felony and assistance can be terminated for knowingly and willingly making a false or fraudulent statement to a department of the United States Government*.**

Add additional signature sheets if necessary. 

# image1.jpg
### Port/Terminal : Our Reference : Drawn By : Representing : Date Sample Taken : Date Submitted : Date Tested : Sample Designated As : Client Reference :

Test Method Units API Gravity @ 60°F ASTM D4052 Deg. API Sulfur ASTM D4294 % Wt. Corrected Flash Point ASTM D93A Deg. °F Viscosity, Kin @ 104°F ASTM D445 cSt

Heat of Combustion ASTM D240 BTU / Pound Heat of Combustion ASTM D240 BTU / Gallon Sediment & Water ASTM D2709 % Vol. Ash Content ASTM D482 % Wt.

Nitrogen ASTM D5762 % Wt. Vanadium ASTM D5863B PPM

Sodium ASTM D5863B PPM (Ultimate Analysis) Carbon ASTM D5291 % Wt. (Ultimate Analysis) Hydrogen ASTM D5291 % Wt. <0.001

12.82

<2 0.022

<2

87.14



### Syed Naqvi Laboratory Manager 

### Intertek Caleb Brett

T: 203-467-3471 F: 203-467-8083 481A East ShorePkwy New Haven, CT 06512 139330 0 

### April 30, 2009 #2 Fuel Oil

Results

2.67 19381 32.43 0.232

156 

### TBN 

# Report of Analysis Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant, MA 29-000380 Submitted Sample 2 Fuel Oil Tank April 29, 2009 April 29, 2009
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.







|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|/s/ | Leon J. Olivier        
|    | Leon J. Olivier        
|    | Chief Executive Officer







|    |                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                     
|    | David R. McHale                                     
|    | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date:  May 7, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit31-2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

** **

I,Pamela Holdren, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of The Dayton Power and Light Company;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

 

c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:       |   November 5,  2004                              |
|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Signature:  |   /s/ Pamela  Holdren                            |   |
| Print Name: |   Pamela  Holdren                                |
| Title:      |   Treasurer  and Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated January 19, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of K-Swiss Inc.
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
K-Swiss Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36505, effective August 23, 1990, File
No. 33-77258, effective April 4, 1994, File No. 33-95650, effective August 10,
1995 and File No. 333-79641, effective May 28, 1999) and on Form S-3 (File No.
333-37895, effective October 17, 1997 and File No. 333-60043, effective July
28, 1998).


 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Los Angeles, California
January 19, 2001

                                      49
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2161

LAURA LESKINEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UTZ QUALITY FOODS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-3678-CCB) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 10, 1998 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Laura Leskinen, Appellant Pro Se. Joan E. Book, Jay Robert Fries, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Laura Leskinen appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary judgment in Leskinen’s action alleging sexual harassment, retaliatory discrimination and discrimination due to her sex and disability under Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 797 (West 1985 & Supp. 1998), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101 to 12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt’s memorandum and order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Leskinen v. Utz Quality Foods, Inc. No. CA-97-3678-CCB (D. Md. July 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AMHN, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2010 (the Report), I, Robert Cambridge, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert Cambridge                    
|Robert Cambridge Chief
Executive Officer
|April 26, 2010                          

A signed original of
this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 11.2

                          Sylvan Inc. and Subsidiaries

         COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK 
                        (In Thousands Except Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              1996                1995             1994
                                                              ----                ----             ----
<S>                                                       <C>                 <C>              <C>
Net earnings applicable to
   Common shareholders                                     $  7,819            $  6,477         $  6,357
                                                           ========            ========         ========

Weighted average number of
   Common shares outstanding                              6,344,610           6,225,995        6,198,171

Add: Common shares issuable
   for stock options at
   year-end market value
   of $12.38 per share                                     112,094              132,677          102,222
                                                          --------             --------         --------

Number of shares applicable
   to fully diluted earnings
   per Common share calculation                          6,456,704            6,358,672        6,300,393
                                                         =========            =========        =========

Fully diluted earnings per
   Common share                                           $   1.21             $   1.02         $   1.01
                                                          ========             ========         ========
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10870

CURTIS MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(4:99-CV-960)

October 10, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Curtis Moo re seeks a certificate of appealability from the

denial by the district court of federal habeas relief from his

state court conviction for capital mur der and his sentence to

death. Judge McBryde denied Moore relief in a detailed opinion and

order filed July 13, 2000, and his request for certificate of
appealability on August 14, 2000.2

W e deny the request for a certificate of appealability and

affirm the judgment below for essentially the same reasons stated

in Judge McBryde’s carefully written order denying relief.
#### James E. MYERS, Jr., Appellant, v. Virginia Lee MYERS, Appellee.

No. 69-594.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants**

 

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 25, 2004, on the consolidated financialstatements of Cryo-Cell International, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of and for the year then ended November 30, 2003, included in the Company’s Form 10-K dated March 1, 2004, into the following registration statements previously filedby the Company: Form S-8 (File No. 333-92991); Form S-8 (File No. 333-65418). 

 

GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Tampa, Florida 

 

February 25, 2004
EXHIBIT 15.1






Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-172742 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 26, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule of Camelot Information Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011.
 
 
 /s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.
 Beijing, the People’s Republic of China
 April 26, 2012
#### Charles Richard FLEMING, Appellant, v. Audrey Edens FLEMING, Appellee.

No. 73-228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 13, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66042-66043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[TX-27-1-5945, FRL-5935-3]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality State Implementation 
Plans (SIP); Texas; Disapproval of Texas Clean Fuel Fleet Program 
Revision to the State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is extending the public comment period from November 
17, 1997, to January 16, 1998, on the proposed disapproval notice of 
the Texas Clean Fuel Fleet (CFF) SIP revision under the Clean Air Act. 
The proposed disapproval document was published in the Federal Register 
on

[[Page 66043]]

October 17, 1997. The extension to the public comment period is being 
granted by EPA in response to the State's request to have additional 
time to assess the proposal, analyze the alternative options available 
and submit comments reflecting this analysis. A similar request was 
also made by the National Association of Fleet Administrators. For 
additional information please refer to the proposed disapproval 
document published in the Federal Register on October 17, 1997 (62 FR 
53997).

DATES: Comments on the proposed disapproval must be received in writing 
by January 16, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Mr. Thomas H. Diggs, 
Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), at the EPA Regional Office listed 
below. Copies of the documents about this action are available for 
public inspection during normal business hours at the following 
locations. Persons interested in examining these documents should make 
an appointment with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the 
visiting day:

Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 
1200, Dallas, Texas 75202.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, 12100 Park 35 Circle, 
Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Scoggins, Air Planning 
Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas, 75202, telephone (214) 665-7354.

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
W.B. Hathaway,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-32785 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P