alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thomas D. PATRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul G. ROSENBLATT, et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-15421.

D.C. No. CV-01-00330-KJD.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2000.*

Decided Aug. 19, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Thomas D. Patrick appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his *Bivens*action against Arizona federal district court judges Paul G. Rosenblatt and Susan R. Bolton. The Nevada district court properly dismissed Patrick’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants, *Doe v. American Nat’l Red Cross,*112 F.3d 1048, 1050-52 (9th Cir.1997), and based upon absolute judicial immunity, *Moore v. Brewster,*96 F.3d 1240, 1243-44 (9th Cir.1996). We reject Patrick’s pending motion as lacking merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Roger HERMANY, as Executor of the Estate of Charles E. Hermany, Deceased, Appellant, v. Josephine Fern HERMANY, Appellee.

No. 72-260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 15, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Osbaldo MONTALVO-DOMINGUEZ, aka El Gordo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50733.

D.C. No. CR-92-00814-GLT-2.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2002.

*792Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Osbaldo Montalvo-Dominguez appeals his 188-month sentence following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to aid and abet the distribution of cocaine and launder money, and money laundering, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1956(a)(1)(B)®. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we affirm.

Montalvo-Dominguez’s challenge to the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 841 is foreclosed by *United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, 562 (9th Cir.) (en banc), *cert, denied,*— U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2314, 152 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2002). Moreover, we find no *Apprendi*error where the sentence actually imposed for each count does not exceed the statutory maximum for each of the crimes of which he was convicted. *See United States v. Gill,*280 F.3d 923, 931 (9th Cir.2002).

Montalvo-Dominguez also challenges the district court’s enhancement of his sentence for his role as a leader or organizer under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a). We review for clear error. *See United States v. Jordan,*291 F.3d 1091, 1097 (9th Cir.2002). In determining the applicability of section 3Bl.l(a), district court should consider the following factors: (1) the exercise of decision making authority, (2) the nature of participation in the commission of the offense, (3) the recruitment of accomplices, (4) the claimed right to a larger share of the fruits of the crime, (5) the degree of participation in planning or organizing the offense, (6) the nature and scope of the illegal activity, and (7) the degree of control and authority exercised over others. *United States v. Berry,*258 F.3d 971, 977-78 (9th Cir.2001); *see United States v. Barnes,*993 F.2d 680, 685 (9th Cir.1993). In reviewing the record, we find no error in the district court’s application of the four-level upward adjustment.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert N. Fitzgerald, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SemGroup Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2011



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert N. Fitzgerald                         
|Robert N. Fitzgerald                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6583

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DONALD TERRELL WASHINGTON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief

District Judge. (3:06-cr-00022-GMG-1)

Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Terrell Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas 

Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald Terrell Washington appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion 

for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Washington, No. 

3:06-cr-00022-GMG-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Agenda 

Financial Literacy and Education Commission Public Meeting 

May 26, 2021 9:00-11:00 AM EDT 

Webcast: www.yorkcast.com/treasury/events/2021/05/26/FLEC. 

Welcome and Opening Remarks 

Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, Chair 

Addressing Racial Equity through Financial Education 

 John Hope Bryant, Founder, Chairman, and CEO, Operation Hope 

 Marc H. Morial, President and CEO, National Urban League 

 Marietta Rodriguez, President and CEO, NeighborWorks 

 John W. Rogers, Jr., Chairman, co-CEO, and Chief Investment Officer, Ariel Investments 

 Justine Zinkin, CEO, Neighborhood Trust Financial Partners 

Moderator: Wally Adeyemo, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury 

FLEC Member Discussion 

Dave Uejio, Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Vice-Chair 

Todd M. Harper, Chairman, National Credit Union Administration 

Wrap up and FLEC Next Steps
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Evidence

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Evidence.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence will hold a two-
day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not 
participation and will be held each day from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

DATES: April 14-15, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, Judicial 
Conference Center, One Columbus Circle, N.E., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, D.C. 20544, telephone (202) 273-1820.

    Dated: February 4, 1997.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 97-3274 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000025757
<NAME> CROMPTON & KNOWLES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                          14,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  199,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,766
<INVENTORY>                                    318,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               615,110
<PP&E>                                         449,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                 433,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,381,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          349,542
<BONDS>                                        668,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,733
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,381,192
<SALES>                                        805,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               805,466
<CGS>                                          495,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  667,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (40,255)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,179
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,426
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             97,172
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,085)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,087
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41


</TABLE>
Docket No. FAA-2014-0006 Dir ID 2013-NM-147-AD

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/5/15

Regional Airline Association 1/5/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/5/15

ATA Joe White 1/5/15
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Executive Committee Meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on 
Women in the Services (DACOWITS)

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Committee on Women in the 
Services.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section10(a), Public Law 92-463, as amended, 
notice is hereby given of a forthcoming Quarterly Executive Committee 
Meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services 
(DACOWITS). The purpose of the Executive Committee Meeting is to 
provide transitional training to the incoming 1998 Executive Committee 
members and an awards ceremony for the 1997 Executive Committee 
members. The Meeting will be open to the public, unless otherwise noted 
below.

DATES: December 8, 1997, 9:15 a.m.-11:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: SECDEF Conference Room 3E869, The Pentagon, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Colonel Kay Troutt, USAF, or CDR Deborah R. Goodwin, USN, 
DACOWITS and Military Women Matters, OASD (Force Management Policy), 
4000 Defense Pentagon, Room 3D749, Washington, DC 20301-4000; telephone 
(703) 697-2122.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meeting agenda:

Monday December, 1997

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Time                                Event             
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7:10-9:00 a.m..........................  DACOWITS member's arrive/      
                                          Breakfast (closed to public). 
9:15-9:30 a.m..........................  Introductions (3E869--SecDef   
                                          Conf Rm, open to public).     
9:30-10:00 a.m.........................  Executive Committee Transition 
                                          (open to public).             
10:00-11:00 a.m........................  Subcommittee Reviews (open to  
                                          public).                      
11:00-11:30 a.m........................  Executive Committee            
                                          Presentations (open to        
                                          public).                      
11:30-1:00 p.m.........................  Lunch (closed to public).      
1:30-4:00 p.m..........................  Transition training for members
                                          (closed to public).           
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Late submission due to scheduling conflict.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-32083 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE, **et al.**

for statements of authorization pursuant to

14 C.F.R. 212 )

)

)

)

)

)

) Docket OST

- 2000

- 6939

NOTIC E OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Laurent Timsi t, Vice President

–

European and Industry Affairs

SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE

45, rue de Paris

F

- 95747, Roissy CDG Cedex

Paris, France Alexander Va n der Bellen

Managing Director

– Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

1212 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 842

- 4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

October 5, 2012BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE, **et al.**

for statements of authorization pursuant to

14 C.F.R. 212 )

)

)

)

)

)

) Dock et OST

- 2000

- 6939

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted to Delta Air Lines,

Inc. (“Delta”), Société Air France (“Air France”), and their respective affiliates, the

carriers hereby notify the Depart ment that, on or after 30 days from today, Air France’s

“AF” designator code will be displayed on flights operated by Delta/Delta Connection on

the following U.S.

- Mexico routes:

Atlanta

– Guadalajara

Atlanta

– Mexico City

Atlanta

- Monterrey

New York

– Me xico City

The initial codeshare routings are provided for illustrat ion purposes. However, as a third

country carrier, Mexico codeshare opportunities for Air France are not subject to any

designation limits. C onsistent with the Department’s handling of 3 0 day notice

requirements in unrestricted designation markets we ask that this be deemed notice for

Air France codesharing to the above named points via any authorized U.S. gateway.Codeshare Notice

Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

/

s/ Laurent Timsi t

______________________ Laurent Timsi t, Vice President

–

European and Industry Affairs SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director, Government Affairs &

Associate General Counsel

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Notice has been served this 5th day of October, 2012 , upon

the following persons via email:

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com ; Francis.Heil@aa.com ; Robert.Wirick@aa.com ;

dan.weiss@united.com ; thomas.bolling@united.com ; howard.kass@usairways.com ; benjamin.slocum@usairways.com ; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov; brian.hed berg @dot.gov ;

info @airlineinfo.com
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2450 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2450

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to except certain 
   individuals from the 80 percent taxable income limitation on net 
                       operating loss carryovers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2021

  Ms. Newman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to except certain 
   individuals from the 80 percent taxable income limitation on net 
                       operating loss carryovers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS NOT SUBJECT TO 80-PERCENT TAXABLE INCOME 
              LIMIT ON NET OPERATING LOSS CARRYOVERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 172(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
``In the case of an individual (other than a trust or estate) whose 
modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year does not exceed 
$400,000, paragraph (2)(B)(ii) shall not apply. For purposes of the 
preceding sentence, the term `modified adjusted gross income' means 
adjusted gross income increased by any amount excluded from gross 
income under section 911, 931, or 933.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
#### Alberico CORRAO, Petitioner, v. 100 LINCOLN ROAD APARTMENT BUILDING et al., Respondents.

No. 43050.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 5, 2019

No. 04-19-00082-CR

Ashleigh Nicole HALL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 580147

Honorable Helen Petry Stowe, Judge Presiding

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal on the docket of this court. This appeal is DISMISSED.

It is so ORDERED on June 5, 2019.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of June, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
#### LOUISIANA FUEL SUPPLY COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Malcolm GUNTER and Malcolm Gunter d. b. a. Gunter Towing Service, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11319.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1970.

Irwin L. Tunis, New Orleans, for appellant.

Hamilton & Carroll, by Orlando N. Hamilton, Jr., Oak Grove, for appellee.

Before AYRES, DIXON and WILLIAMS, JJ.

AYRES, Judge.

This is an action upon an open account. The minutes of the court reflect that a judgment was “rendered” rejecting plaintiff’s demands. However, no signed judgment appears in the record. In fact, the record reflects the judgment was not signed.

The rule is well established that no appeal lies from a final judgment before it is signed. Until signed, the judgment is inchoate and the appeal is premature. Brock v. Police Jury of Rapides Parish, 198 La. 787, 4 So.2d 829 (1941); Succession of Savoie, 195 La. 433, 196 So. 923, 924 (1940) ; Guidry v. Seacoast Products, Inc., 214 So.2d 904 (La.App., 3d Cir. 1968); Forman v. May, 201 So.2d 683, 685 (La.App., 3d Cir. 1967).

The minute entry of the court’s decision does not suffice as satisfaction of the *661requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure (LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1911) that final judgments must be read and signed by the judge in open court. Guidry v. Seacoast Products, Inc., supra; Fontenot v. Lee, 160 So.2d 26 (La.App., 3d Cir. 1964).

In such cases where judgments are prematurely signed, appeals must be dismissed even on the court’s own motion. Forman v. May, supra, and authorities cited therein.

But, as pointed out in *Succession of Savoie,*supra, an order granting an appeal from an unsigned judgment does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction to grant a second order of appeal after judgment is signed, inasmuch as the first order was illegal. The trial judge is justified in curing this irregularity by a subsequent order after the judgment is signed. Greene v. Baynard, 194 La. 409, 193 So. 690 (1940); Forman v. May, supra.

For the reasons assigned, this appeal is dismissed, without prejudice, at the cost of plaintiff-appellant.

Appeal dismissed.