# TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TO: Jodi Howard, US EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/RCG

FROM: Eastern Research Group, Inc.

DATE: February 9, 2012

SUBJECT: Generally Available Control Technology (GACT) Analysis for Area Sources

in the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Sour ce Category

1.0 Introduction

This memorandum documents the methodology and results of the analysis of generally available control technology (GACT) options for the polyvinyl chloride and copolymers (PVC) production source category. An analysis of baseline levels of control for the existing area sources is presented as well as analyses of additional control options for the existing area sources. Also presented is an analysis of generally available levels o f control for new area sources.

2.0 Existing and New Area Source Facilities

There are two existing non-major (area) sources of haza rdous air pollutant (HAP) emissions in the PVC source category, CertainTeed Corpo ration’s Lake Charles, LA facility and Occidental Chemical (OxyVinyls) Corporation’s Deer Park, TX facility. Additionally, we do not expect any new area sources will be constructed in the n ext 5 years.

2.1 Sources of Data

The determination of available technology for the contr ol of emissions from existing area sources was based on data and information available from the two operating area source facilities, CertainTeed Lake Charles and OxyVinyls Deer Park. Data from major sources were also used to determine available control technology for s tripped resin subcategories for which no area source data existed. These sources of information an d data included the following:

• Facility state operating permits (see Attachment A);

• The companies’ responses to US EPA’s Clean Air Act Sect ion 114 survey and testing requests (section 114) of August 21, 2009 and March 2011;

• Additional information, data, and comments provided by Cert ainTeed Lake Charles, or its parent corporation, Saint-Gobain, during development of the PVC source category NESHAP rulemaking or following publication of the proposed rul e; and

• Additional information, data, and comments provided by OxyVi nyls Deer Park, or its parent corporation, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, duri ng development of the

1

# proposed NESHAP rule for the PVC source category or follo wing publication of the

proposed rule.

2.2 Analysis of Data

2.2.1 General Process Description

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility produces PVC via th e bulk resin process in 2 production lines and manufactured 447 million pounds of resin in 2008.Vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) is piped in from off-site and is polymerized in 9 po lymerization reactors. Residual vinyl chloride (VC) is removed from the polymerized resin (stri pped) in the reactor. Due to the nature of the bulk manufacturing process, the polymerized resin leaving the reactors is not dewatered or dried, but rather routed to resin hoppers where the resi n is then screened and sent to storage silos. The resin is loaded into railcars and then shipped off-sit e. There is a VC recovery system (condenser) to recover VC that is vented from the reac tors and wastewater stripper.

Process vents from the reactors are routed to the VC r ecovery system along with the vent stream from the wastewater stripper where VC is recov ered and the remaining gas stream is sent to a thermal oxidizer equipped with a packed bed scrubber for ac id control.

The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility produces PVC via the suspens ion resin process in 2 production lines and has a reported production capacity of 550 million pounds per year. VCM is piped in and is polymerized in 8 polymerization reactors. A fter polymerization, residual VC is stripped from the polymerized resin in steam strippers. Th e stripped resin is dewatered in centrifuges and dried in flash dryers. The resin is then pneumatically conveyed, screened, and stored in silos. The resin is transported to customers pr imarily by rail, with the balance transported by truck. There is a VC recovery system (co ndensers) to recover VC that is vented from the process.

Process vents, including vents from the resin stripper and the wastewater stripper, are routed to the VCM recovery system and the remaining gas stream is sent to thermal oxidizers equipped with spray nozzle scrubbers for acid control loca ted at OxyVinyls LaPorte VCM plant.

2.2.2 Regulations

The CertainTeed facility is subject to 40 CFR part 61 subpart F, 40 CFR part 61 subpart V, and LA State Air Permit, 0520-00025-05, issued September 29, 2005 (s ee Attachment A) according to CertainTeed’s response to the August 21, 2009 sect ion 114 request.

In addition to the standards, limits, and requirements of the above, the CertainTeed facility must maintain the stripped resin limits as spec ified in 40 CFR 61.64(e). The methods and procedures of 40 CFR 61.67(g)(6) apply, and the facility must me asure and record the residual VC in each batch of PVC product. Furthermore, the facili ty is subject to a state-only stripped resin permit limit for VC of 10 ppmw (LA specific condit ion 1).

2

# The CertainTeed facility must maintain continuous monito ring of thermal oxidizer stacks

for VC emissions; the stack concentration cannot excee d 10 parts per million by volume (ppmv) over a 3 hour period.

In addition, the CertainTeed facility must maintain a leak detection and repair (LDAR) program that meets 40 CFR part 61 subparts F and V; except wi th a leak definition of 1000 ppmv (state only permit condition for leak definition). The facility must also operate and maintain an ambient air monitoring system for VC in accordance with 40 CFR 61.65(b)(8)(i).

The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility is subject to 40 CFR part 61 subpart A, 40 CFR part 61 subpart F, 40 CFR part 61 subpart V, 40 CFR part 63 subpart F, 30 T AC 115, 30 TAC 116, 30 TAC 106, 30 TAC 111 and TX State Air Permit, 4673B, issued July 13, 2009 (see Attachment A).

In addition to the standards, limits, and requirements of the above, the OxyVinyls facility must maintain the stripped resin limits as specified in 40 CFR 61.64(e). The methods and procedures of 40 CFR 61.67(g)(3) apply. Furthermore, the OxyVinyls Deer Park is limited to a stripped resin VC limit of 8 ppmv on an annual average basi s by the State Air Permit.

2.2.3 Permitted Emissions

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility has the facility -wide permitted emission rates as shown in Table 1 1 

# . A breakout of those emissions by permitted emission point is shown in Table 2.

Table 1. Facility-Wide Permitted Emissions for CertainTeed Lake Charles

Pollutant Permitted Emissions (tons/year) Carbon monoxide (CO) 5.7 Volatile organic compounds (VOC) 4.41 Vinyl chloride Monomer (VCM) 3.96

#  1 

# See also memorandum titled “Potential to Emit Calcul ations for CertainTeed – Lake Charles, LA” from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, dated April 8, 2011 (Do cket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037) concerning CertainTeed’s potential to emit.

3

# Table 2. Permitted Emissions for CertainTeed Lake Charle s by Emission Point

Emission Point No. Emission Point CO (tons/year) VOC

(tons/year) VCM

(tons/year)
1-76 Boiler 4.2 0.33 - 5-76 Initial Classification (Unit 1 Poly) - 0.82 0.82 6-76 Crusher Conveyor “B” Product - - -

2-79A Thermal Oxidizer “A” 0.5 0.26 0.22

2-79B Thermal Oxidizer “B” 0.5 0.26 0.22

2-79C Thermal Oxidizer “C” 0.5 0.26 0.22 3-87 Reactor Openings (9 reactors) - 0.04 0.04 4-87 Fugitives - 0.5 0.5 1-97 Initial Classification (Unit 2 Poly) - 0.43 0.43 1-01 Stack (7-76, 8-76, and 9-76) - 1.51 1.51 1-05 Classification Building #2 Bag-house - - -

Totals 5.7 4.41 3.96

CO – Carbon monoxide VOC – Volatile organic compounds VCM – Vinyl chloride monomer



# The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility has the facility-wide permitted emission rates 2 

# as indicated in the attached facility permit, found in Attac hment A.

2.2.4 Section 114 Survey Responses

As discussed in a separate memorandum 1 

# , both CertainTeed Lake Charles and OxyVinyls Deer Park facilities were included in the August 21, 2009, sect ion 114 which collected data related to facility operations, emissions testing and resin sampling. As noted in the memorandum 1 

# , CertainTeed Lake Charles did not provide 30-day resin samp ling information. As also discussed in the memorandum 1 

# , during the Deer Park facility emissions testing in res ponse to the August 21, 2009 section 114, only the process vents from the PVC production were routed to the control system operated by OxyVinls LaPorte facili ty. OxyVinyls Deer Park provided additional emissions testing information in response to th e March 16, 2011 section 114. For the March 2011 section 114, OxyVinyls performed emissions testing un der normal operating conditions (i.e., all process vents normally routed to t he control device were being controlled). The facility responses to the August 21, 2009 and March 2011 secti on 114 can be found in the docket.

3.0 Determination of Currently Available Level of Control at Ex isting Area Sources

The level of control currently available to the existi ng area sources was determined for process vents, stripped resin, wastewater, equipment leaks , heat exchangers, storage tanks and other emission sources. The following section describes how the level of control currently available to the existing area sources was determined for each emission point. 2 

# See also memorandum titled “Potential to Emit Calcul ations for OxyVinyls – Deer Park, TX” from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, dated January 9, 2012 (Doc ket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037) concerning Deer Park’s potential to emit.

4

# 3.1 Process Vents

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility operates a PVC- only process vent, as defined in a separate memorandum 2 

# . The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility operates a PVC-combine d process vent, also defined in a separate memorandum 2 

# . The level of control currently available was determined for each type of process vent. The level of co ntrol for both types of process vents was determined in a similar fashion to the MACT floors deter mined for process vents at major

sources 2 

# except that data from only the single area source in ea ch subcategory were analyzed. Data variability was incorporated into the level of con trol currently available using the same methodology as described in the memorandum “Revised Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chlo ride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category 2 

# .” Non-detect (ND) values were also incorporated in the same manner as described the aforementioned memorandum.

3.1.1 PVC-Only Process Vents

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility submitted emissio ns testing information in response to the August 21, 2009, section 114 for VC, chlorinated d ibenzodioxin and chlorinated dibenzofurans (CDD/CDF), total organic HAP and total hydro carbons (THC). The level of control currently available for PVC-only process vents w as determined using the CertainTeed Lake Charles emissions testing data. Tables 3 through 6 presen t the results of the variability analysis for VC, CDD/CDF, total organic HAP and THC for PVC-only process vents at area sources. The PVC-only process vent analysis for the le vel of control currently available at existing area sources is presented in Attachment B.

5

# Table 3. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Only Area S ources – VC

Normal Lognormal Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Non-Detects 0 0 Average (ppmvd) 5.24 1.66 Median (ppmvd) 5.24 1.66 Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 1.00E-02 1.91E-03 Minimum (ppmvd) 5.23 1.65 Maximum (ppmvd) 5.25 1.66

Skewness 0 -2.86E-03

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 5.30 5.30

Detection Limit Analysis Average (ppmvd) 5.24 RDL (ppmvd) 1.84E-01 3x RDL(ppmvd) 5.52E-01

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 5.3

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 5.3 ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points ) 3x Max DL – Maximum detection limit less than or equal to aver age multiplied by 3

6

# Table 4. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Only Area S ources – CDD/CDF (TEQ)

Normal Lognormal Sample Size 3.00 3.00 Average (ng/dscm) 3.11E-02 -3.56 Median (ng/dscm) 2.29E-02 -3.78 Standard Deviation (ng/dscm) 1.73E-02 5.15E-01 Minimum (ng/dscm) 1.94E-02 -3.94 Maximum (ng/dscm) 5.09E-02 -2.98

Skewness 1.65 1.53

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 1.29E-01 5.30E-01

Detection Limit Analysis Average (ng/dscm) 3.11E-02

RDL [1] 

# (ng/dscm) 1.25E-02

3x RDL [1] 

# (ng/dscm) 3.74E-02

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 1.29E-01

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 5.30E-01 [1] – Calculated based on data from various industries 3 

# ng/dscm – nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, correct ed to 3 percent oxygen, toxic equivalency basis SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points ) RDL – Representative detection limit

7

# Table 5. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Only Area S ources – Total Organic

HAP

Normal Lognormal

Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Non-Detects 3.00 3.00 Average (ppmvd) 73.7 4.29 Median (ppmvd) 75.5 4.32 Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 10.7 1.49E-01 Minimum (ppmvd) 62.2 4.13 Maximum (ppmvd) 83.4 4.42

Skewness -7.36E-01 -9.07E-01

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 135 171

Detection Limit Analysis Average (ppmvd) 73.7 RDL (ppmvd) 1.81 3x RDL (ppmvd) 5.42

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 135

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 171 ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points ) RDL – Representative detection limit

8

# Table 6. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Only Area S ources – THC

Normal Lognormal Sample Size 3.00 3.00 Average (ppmvd) 16.6 2.78 Median (ppmvd) 15.3 2.72 Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 5.05 2.96E-01 Minimum (ppmvd) 12.4 2.51 Maximum (ppmvd) 22.2 3.10

Skewness 1.10 78.9E-01

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 45.32 86.912

Detection Limit Analysis Average in variability analysis (ppmvd) 16.6 RDL (ppmvd) 8.45E-01 3x RDL (ppmvd) 2.53

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 45.3

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 86.9 ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen as propane SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points ) RDL – Representative detection limit



# 3.1.2 PVC-Combined Process Vents

The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility submitted emissions tes ting information in response to the August 21, 2009, section 114 for VC, CDD/CDF, and total organic HAP; however, testing was performed under non-normal operating conditions 3 

# . The facility submitted additional testing data in response to the March 16, 2011 section 114. The March 2011 section 114 required facilities to test only for VC, CDD/CDF and THC; the f acilities included in the section 114 were not required to test for any other HAP, nor did OxyVinyls De er Park voluntarily test for any other HAP. As a result the level of control currently available for PVC-combined process vents at area sources was determined using the OxyVinyls Deer Par k 2011 emissions testing data for VC, CDD/CDF and THC but not for total organic HAP because OxyVinyls Deer Park did not submit total organic HAP emissions data for its PVC combine d process vent while operating 3 

# Please refer to the memorandum titled “Revised Maximu m Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category” section 3.1 for a description of normal and non-normal operating conditions

.

9

# under normal conditions. The level of control currently available for PVC –combined process vents at area sources for total organic HAP was determi ned using data from the least controlled major source, the Westlake – Geismar facility. Tables 7 through 10 present the results of the variability analysis for VC, CDD/CDF, total organic HAP and THC for PVC-combined process vents at area sources. The PVC-combined process vent an alysis for the level of control currently available at existing area sources is presented in Attachm ent C.

Table 7. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Combined A rea Sources – VC

Normal Lognormal Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Non-Detects 3.00 3.00 Average (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 -1.65 Median (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 -1.65 Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 3.40E-17 0 Minimum (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 -1.65 Maximum (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 -1.65

Skewness NA NA

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 1.93E-01

Detection Limit Analysis Average (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 RDL (ppmvd) 1.84E-01 3x RDL(ppmvd) 5.52E-01

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.93E-01

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.93E-01 ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points ) RDL – Representative detection limit

10

# Table 8. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Combined A rea Sources – CDD/CDF (TEQ)

Normal Lognormal Sample Size 3.00 3.00 Average (ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 -4.33 Median (ng/dscm) 1.07E-02 -4.54 Standard Deviation (ng/dscm) 1.06E-02 6.50E-01 Minimum (ng/dscm) 7.89E-03 -4.84 Maximum (ng/dscm) 2.74E-02 -3.60

Skewness 1.60 1.32

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 7.55E-02 5.34E-01

Detection Limit Analysis Average (ng/dscm) 1.53E-02

RDL [1] 

# (ng/dscm) 1.12E-02

3x RDL [1] 

# (ng/dscm) 3.35E-02

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 7.55E-02

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ng/dscm) 5.34E-01 [1] – Calculated based on data from various industries 3 

# ng/dscm – nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, correct ed to 3 percent oxygen, toxic equivalency basis SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points ) RDL – Representative detection limit

11

# Table 9. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Combined A rea Sources – Total Organic HAP [1]



# Normal Lognormal Sample Size 3.00 3.00

Non-Detects 3.00 3.00 Average (ppmvd) 4.02 1.00 Median (ppmvd) 1.93 6.59E-01 Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 4.28 1.06 Minimum (ppmvd) 1.17 1.58E-01 Maximum (ppmvd) 8.94 2.19

Skewness 1.67 1.31

SE Skewness 1.41 1.41

Skewness Test Normal Normal

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 28.4 1,126

Detection Limit Analysis Average (ppmvd) 4.02 RDL (ppmvd) 1.81 3x RDL (ppmvd) 5.42

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 28.4

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1,126 [1] – Based on data from least controlled major source f or PVC-Combined process vents (Westlake Geismar) ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points ) RDL – Representative detection limit

12

# Table 10. Current Level of Control Available at PVC-Combined A rea Sources – THC

Normal Lognormal Sample Size 3.00 3.00 Average (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 -2.21 Median (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 -2.21 Standard Deviation (ppmvd) 0 0 Minimum (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 -2.21 Maximum (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 -2.21

Skewness NA NA

SE Skewness NA NA

Skewness Test NA NA

Kurtosis NA NA

SE Kurtosis NA NA

Kurtosis Test NA NA

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.96 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 1.10E-01

Detection Limit Analysis Average (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 RDL (ppmvd) 7.58E-01 3x RDL (ppmvd) 2.27

UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.10E-01

UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmvd) 1.10E-01 ppmvd – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen as propane SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal NA – Analysis not applicable (limited number of data points ) RDL – Representative detection limit



# Table 11 presents a summary of the level of control curre ntly available at area sources for PVC-only and PVC-combined process vents.

Table 11. Current Level of Control (as Concentration) Available at Existing Area Sources – Process Vents

Pollutant PVC-Only [1] 

# PVC

Combined [1]



# VC (ppmv) 5.3 5. 6E

- 01 [2]



# CDD/CDF (TEQ) (ng/dscm) 1.3E

- 01 7.6E

- 02 Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 140 29 THC (ppmv as propane) 46 2.3 [2]



# [1] Current level of control concentrations were rounded up to 2 significant figures (e.g., 100.1 would be rounded to 110). [2] Level of control result of detection limit variabil ity analysis. CDD/CDF – Chlorinated dibenzodioxin and Chlorinated dibenzofura n

13

# HAP – Hazardous air pollutants THC – Total hydrocarbons ppmv – Parts per million by volume dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen ng/dscm – nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, correct ed to 3 percent oxygen, toxic equivalency basis



# 3.2 Stripped Resin

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility produces bulk resin . The OxyVinyls Deer Park facility produces suspension resin. The level of control curr ently available was determined for both types of resin in a similar fashion to the MACT f loors determined for stripped resins at major sources except that data from only the single area source in each subcategory were analyzed. Data variability was incorporated into the lev el of control currently available using the same methodology as described in the memorandum “ Revise d Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chlo ride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category 2 

# .” ND values were also incorporated in the same manner a s described in the aforementioned memorandum. The analysis for the level of control currently available at existing area sources for stripped resins is presented in Attachment D.

3.2.1 Stripped Resin - Bulk Resins

The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility did not report r esin sampling results for the 4 year Method 107 data set or the 30 day sampling required by the August 21 , 2009 section 114, as described in a separate memorandum 1 

# . For bulk resins, the level of control currently availa ble at existing PVC area sources was determined using the survey dat a reported through the August 21, 2009 section 114. Furthermore, statistical and variability anal yses could not be performed since these types of analyses require multiple data points w hich were not available. Table 12 presents the level of control currently available for bulk resi ns at existing PVC area sources.

Table 12. Average VC and Total Non-VC Organic HAP Concentrations i n Bulk

Resin at Existing Area Sources

Company/Facility Average VC Concentration [1] 

# (ppmw) Average Total Non

- VC Organic HAP Concentration [1] 

# (ppmw)
CertainTeed - Lake Charles 7.1 160 [1] Average concentrations were rounded up to 2 significant figures (e.g., 100.1 would be rounded to 110). HAP – hazardous air pollutant ppmw – parts per million by weight



# 3.2.2 Stripped Resin - Suspension Resins

The current level of control for VC in suspension resins at existing PVC area sources was determined using 4 years of Method 107 concentration data at th e OxyVinyls Deer Park facility, submitted by the Vinyl Institute. The current level of con trol for total non-vinyl chloride organic HAP (total non-VC organic HAP) was determined using the update d 30-day resin sampling data for OxyVinyls Deer Park. Table 13 presents the results of the 99.9 percentile analysis for VC and

14

# Table 14 presents the results of the total non- VC organic HAP variability analysis. The

methodologies used to perform each analysis are described i n a separate memorandum 2



# .

Table 13. 99.9 Percentile VC Concentration in Suspension Resi n at Existing Area Sources

Company/Facility 99.9 Percentile Value (ppmw) OxyVinyls - Deer Park 35.2 HAP – hazardous air pollutant ppmw – parts per million by weight



# Table 14. Current Level of Control Available at PVC Area Source s – Suspension Resin – Total Non-VC Organic HAP

Normal Log-Normal Sample Size 27 27 Average (ppmw) 12.1 2.38 Median (ppmw) 8.98 2.20 Standard Deviation (ppmw) 6.25 4.65E-01 Minimum (ppmw) 6.25 1.84 Maximum (ppmw) 24.8 3.21

Skewness 1.01 6.97E-01

SE Skewness 4.71E-01 4.71E-01

Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

Kurtosis -5.92E-01 -1.06

SE Kurtosis 9.43E-01 9.43E-01

Kurtosis Test Normal Normal

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 2.48 2.48 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 27.9 35.0

Detection Limit Analysis Average in variability analysis (ppmw) 12.1 RDL (ppmw) 4.75 3x RDL (ppmw) 14.3 UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 27.9 UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 35.0 ppmw – Parts per million by weight basis SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal RDL – Representative detection limit



# 3.2.3 Stripped Resin – Dispersion, Suspension Blending, and Copolymer Resins

15

# No existing area sources produce dispersion resin, suspensio n blending resin, or

copolymer resin. However, if an existing PVC major sou rce is able to become a synthetic area source (e.g., by taking a federally enforceable limit on it s potential to emit) before the first compliance date, it would be subject to area source rathe r than major source requirements. Therefore, in order to develop GACT standards for other s tripped resin subcategories, the level of control currently available to existing area sources fo r these resin types was determined to be equivalent to that of the least controlled existing majo r source for each resin type. For dispersion resins, the least controlled major source was determined to be the Formosa – Delaware City facility. The VC and total non-VC organic HAP analyses f or dispersion resins are shown in Table 15 and Table 16. Since there is only 1 source in the suspe nsion blending and copolymer resin types, the level of control currently available to existing area sources was determined to be equivalent to the MACT floor determination for suspension blending and copolymer resin types. The analyses for suspension blending and copolymer resin type s are presented in a separate memorandum

2 

# . Table 17 presents a summary of the level of control curr ently available to existing PVC area sources for each resin type.

Table 15. 99.9 Percentile VC Concentration in Dispersion Resi n at Existing Area Sources

Company/Facility 99.9 Percentile Value (ppmw) Formosa – Delaware 1,432 HAP – hazardous air pollutant ppmw – parts per million by weight

16

# Table 16. Current Level of Control Available at PVC Area Source s – Dispersion Resin – Total Non-VC Organic HAP

Normal Log-Normal Sample Size 28 28 Average (ppmw) 67.6 4.00 Median (ppmw) 55.3 4.01 Standard Deviation (ppmw) 50.0 7.04E-01 Minimum (ppmw) 6.24 1.83 Maximum (ppmw) 267 5.59

Skewness 2.52 -6.73E-01

SE Skewness 4.63E-01 4.63E-01

Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

Kurtosis 8.89 2.56

SE Kurtosis 9.26E-01 9.26E-01

Kurtosis Test Non-normal Non-normal

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 2.47 2.47 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 193 319

Detection Limit Analysis Average in variability analysis (ppmw) 67.6 RDL (ppmw) 4.75 3x RDL (ppmw) 14.3 UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 193 UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 319 ppmw – Parts per million by weight basis SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal 3x Max DL – Maximum detection limit less than or equal to aver age multiplied by 3

17

# Table 17. Summary of Level of Control Currently Available [ 

# 1] 

# to 

# Area Sources for Resins at Existing Sources

Resin Type VC [2] 

# (ppmw) Total Non-VC Organic HAP [3] 

# (ppmw) Suspension 36 36 [4]



# Dispersion 1,500 320

Suspension Blending 140 500

Copolymer 790 1,900

Bulk 7.1 170 [5]



# [1] – Levels of control were rounded up to two significant figures (e.g., 100.1 would be rounded to 110). [2] – calculated using 99.9 th 

# percentile. [3] – calculated using 99% UPL with m=1 [4] – UPL value calculated as 35.003 ppmw – rounded to 36.0 ppmw. [5] – Rounded from 160.2 ppmw to 170 ppmw. HAP – Hazardous air pollutant Total non-VC organic HAP does not include vinyl chloride.



# 3.3 Wastewater

The level of control currently available at existing P VC area sources was determined for VC and total non-VC organic HAP for process wastewater. The CertainTeed Lake Charles facility provided wastewater concentration data at the w astewater stripper outlet in response to the August 21, 2009 section 114. The Vinyl Institute submitted year 2008 VC concentration data at the outlet of the stripper for the OxyVinyls Deer Pa rk facility. For both facilities, the annual average VC concentration at the wastewater stripper o utlet was determined to be 0.4 ppmw. However, a variability analysis was performed on the m onthly OxyVinyls Deer Park data and is presented in Table 18. A variability analysis could not be pe rformed on the CertainTeed concentration data since only 1 data point was submitted. The analysis for the level of control currently available at existing area sources for wastewa ter is presented in Attachment E.

18

# Table 18. Wastewater Stripper Outlet Concentration Variability Analysis for Existing Area Sources – VC

Normal Log-Normal Sample Size 12 12 Average (ppmw) 3.99E-01 -1.19 Median (ppmw) 2.89E-01 -1.24 Standard Deviation (ppmw) 4.16E-01 6.77E-01 Minimum (ppmw) 1.20E-01 -2.12 Maximum (ppmw) 1.67 5.14E-01

Skewness 3.05 1.32

SE Skewness 7.07E-01 7.07E-01

Skewness Test Non-normal Normal

Kurtosis 9.92 3.17

SE Kurtosis 1.41 1.41

Kurtosis Test Non-normal Non-normal

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 2.72 2.72 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 1.58 2.06

Detection Limit Analysis Average in variability analysis (ppmw) 3.99E-01 RDL (ppmw) 1.00E-02 3x RDL (ppmw) 3.00E-02 UPL Value Using Normally Distributed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 1.58 UPL Value Using LN Transformed Data 99.0% UPL (ppmw) 2.06 ppmw – Parts per million by weight basis SE – Standard error (applied to skewness or kurtosis) UPL - Upper prediction limit DL – Detection limit LN – Log normal 3x Max DL – Maximum detection limit less than or equal to aver age multiplied by 3



# The level of control currently available to existing are a sources at the wastewater stripper outlet for total non-VC organic HAP was determined using da ta submitted by OxyVinyls Deer Park in response to the August 21, 2009 section 114, as the Certa inTeed facility did not provide any total non-VC organic HAP concentration data for the wastewater stripper outlet. OxyVinyls Deer Park only submitted 1 concentration value of 0.018 ppmw tot al non-VC organic HAP which was determined to be the level of control current ly available to existing area sources at the wastewater stripper outlet on a monthly basis. Table 19 s ummarizes the level of control for wastewater at existing area sources.

19

# Table 19. Level of Control Currently Available to Existing PVC Area Sources for Process Wastewater

Pollutant Level of Control Currently Available (ppmw) VC (ppmw) 2.1 Total Non-VC Organic HAP (ppmw) 1.8E-02 HAP – hazardous air pollutant ppmw – parts per million by weight



# 3.4 Equipment Leaks

Facility submitted survey information was reviewed to det ermine the level of control currently available for equipment leaks. Both facilitie s currently comply with the LDAR program requirements of 40 CFR part 61 subpart F and 40 CFR part 61 subpart V. Therefore; 40 CFR part 61 subpart F and 40 CFR part 61 subpart V were determined to be the level of control currently available to existing area sources for equipment leaks.

3.5 Heat Exchangers

Facility submitted survey information was reviewed to det ermine the level of control currently available for heat exchangers. A leak definiti on of 5,000 parts per billion by weight (ppbw) and monthly monitoring were determined to be the level of control currently available at existing area sources for equipment leaks. The analysis fo r the level of control currently available at existing area sources for heat exchangers i s presented in Attachment F.

3.6 Other Emission Sources

Facility submitted survey information was reviewed to dete rmine the level of control currently available for other emission sources. Each ar ea source facility currently complies with 40 CFR part 61 subpart F to limit emissions from reactor o penings. Neither facility currently controls emissions from gasholders. Therefore, 40 CFR part 61 subpart F was determined to be the level of control currently available for other emi ssion sources at existing area sources.

3.7 Storage Vessels

Facility submitted survey information was reviewed to dete rmine the level of control currently available for storage vessels. Neither facil ity currently controls emissions from storage vessels. Therefore, no level of control currently ava ilable for storage vessels at existing area sources was determined.

4.0 Determination of Expected Level of Control at New Area S ources

New area sources are expected to be controlled as well a s, if not better than, existing area sources. Therefore, the level of control available to new area sources was determined to be equivalent to the level of control currently available to existing area sources. Consideration was given to estimating the new area source level of cont rol by using the best controlled existing area

20

# source. However, with data from only two facilities ava ilable for this GACT analysis, the

analysis for PVC-combined process vents, PVC-only process vents, bulk resin, and suspension resin is based on data from only one facility. For the other emission points (except dispersion resin, suspension blending resin and copolymer resin discusse d in section 3.0) both facilities are equivalent in terms of their current level of control . For example, for equipment leaks, the CertainTeed Lake Charles facility and the OxyVinyls Deer Park facility both comply with 40 CFR part 61, subpart V; therefore, both facilities represe nt the best controlled area source. Consequently, the current level of control for new are a sources was determined to be equivalent to the current level of control for existing area source s and, as a result, the remainder of the GACT analysis was determined to be equivalent for existin g and new area sources.

5.0 Annual Emissions Estimate

The annual emissions from each emission point for ea ch area source facility were estimated using the same methodology as described in the t echnical memorandum titled “Revised Baseline Emission Estimates for Major Sources in the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category 4 

# .”

5.1 Process Vents

Annual emission estimates for VC, CDD/CDF and total o rganic HAP were calculated for process vents at each area source facility. Table 20 pre sents the results of the annual emission estimate calculation which is provided in Attachment B an d Attachment C.

Table 20. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Source s – Process Vents

Facility Annual Emission Estimate ( Tons/Year ) VC CDD/CDF (TEQ) Total Organic HAP CertainTeed

– Lakes Charles [1] 

# 5.84E

- 02 1.32E

- 10 1.07 OxyVinyls

– Deer Park [2] 

# 2.79E

- 01 8.42E

- 09 4.61 [1] PVC-only process vent [2] PVC-combined process vent TEQ – Toxic Equivalency



# 5.2 Resins

Annual emission estimates for VC and total non-VC organic HAP were calculated for stripped resin at each area source facility. As discuss ed in a separate memorandum, it was assumed that the total amount of all VC and other HAP i n the stripped resin would be emitted from process equipment downstream of the resin stripper. For facilities that manufacture a type of resin other than a bulk resin, the majority of th ese emissions would likely occur from the resin centrifuge and/or dryer vents as the resin slurry is dri ed. However, the manufacture of bulk resins does not require the use of a resin dryer as the product is a solid and not a slurry after the polymerization process. Therefore, emission estimates reported in CertainTeed’s survey response were used to calculate annual emissions instead of assum ing all residual HAP remaining in the resin would be emitted. Although there are no existing ar ea sources that currently produce dispersion, suspension blending, or copolymer resins, ann ual emission estimates for such resin types were determined by assuming an annual resin production ra te of approximately 4.4 million tons per year. A resin production rate of 4.4 million ton s per year results in total annual facility

21

# emission estimates of less than 25 tons per year of tot al HAP for a model facility producing

dispersion, suspension blending, or copolymer resins. Ta ble 21 presents the results of the annual emission estimate calculation for resins which is provi ded in Attachment D.

Table 21. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Source s – Resins

Facility Annual Emission Estimate (Tons/Year)

VC Total Non

- VC

Organic HAP CertainTeed

– Lakes Charles [1] 

# 9.39E

- 01 5.58 OxyVinyls

– Deer Park [2] 

# 2.38E

- 01 3.34 Dispersion Resin Facility 1.17 1.48E

- 01 Suspension Blending Resin Facility 3.43E-02 1.40E-01

Copolymer Resin Facility 7.91E

- 01 1.95E

- 01 [1] Facility produces bulk resin. [2] Facility produces suspension resin.



# 5.3 Wastewater

Annual emission estimates for VC and total non-VC organic HAP were calculated for process and maintenance wastewater for each area source facility. Table 22 presents the results of the annual emission estimate calculation for waste water which is provided in Attachment E.

Table 22. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Source s – Wastewater

Facility Annual Emission Estimate (Tons/Year)

VC Total Non

- VC

Organic HAP CertainTeed

– Lakes Charles 3.91E

- 01 3.44 OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 5.12E

- 01 8.81



# 5.4 Equipment Leaks

Annual emission estimates for total organic HAP were ca lculated for equipment leaks at each existing area source facility. As previously stated, the same methodology as described in the technical memorandum titled “ Revised Baseline Emission E stimates for Major Sources in the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category 4 

# ” was used except that equipment counts provided by CertainTeed Lake Charles were s ubstituted where applicable; otherwise, equipment counts from a simple complexity che mical facility were used. Table 23 presents the results of the annual emission estimate c alculation for equipment leaks which is provided in Attachment G.

22

# Table 23. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Source s – Equipment Leaks

Facility Annual Emission Estimate (Tons/Year) Total Organic HAP CertainTeed

– Lakes Charles 10.0 OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 10.0



# 5.5 Heat Exchangers

Annual emission estimates for VC and total organic HAP w ere calculated for heat exchange systems at existing area sources. Table 24 presents the results of the annual emission estimate calculation for heat exchange systems which is provided in Attachment F.

Table 24. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Source s – Heat Exchangers

Facility Annual Emission Estimate (Tons/Year) VC Total Organic HAP CertainTeed

– Lakes Charles 5.31 5.31 OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 1.25 1.25



# 5.6 Other Emission Sources

Annual emission estimates for VC and total organic HAP w ere extracted from information submitted in the August 21, 2009 section 114 for othe r emission sources at existing area sources. Table 25 summarizes the annual emission es timate for other emission sources provided in the survey. Survey information is presented in A ttachment H.

Table 25. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Source s – Other Emission Sources

Facility Annual Emission Estimate (Tons/Year) VC Total Organic HAP CertainTeed

– Lakes Charles 3.35E

- 02 3.35E

- 02 OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 3.04E

- 01 3.06E

- 01



# 5.7 Storage Vessels

Annual emission estimates for VC and total organic HAP w ere extracted from information submitted in the August 21, 2009 section 114 for sto rage vessels at existing area sources. Table 26 summarizes the annual emission estimate for storage vessels provided in the survey. Survey information is presented in Attachment J

.

23

# Table 26. Annual Emission Estimates for Existing Area Source s – Storage Vessels

Facility Annual Emission Estimate (Tons/Year) VC Total Organic HAP CertainTeed

– Lakes Charles

- 1.00E

- 04 OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 3.36E

- 01 4.92E

- 01



# 6.0 Control Options Analysis

For each emission point, multiple control options bey ond level of control currently available were evaluated on a basis of cost effectivene ss (i.e., dollars per ton of total organic HAP reduced per year). The following section describes how the costs of such controls and the associated emission reductions were calculated.

6.1 Process Vents

Two control options beyond the level of control curre ntly being used were evaluated for each type of process vent. The first option was requir ing the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for major sources in addition to the level of control currently being used by existing area sources. The same methodology used to c alculate testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting costs for major sources was used for area sources and is described in a separate memorandum 5 

# . Table 27 summarizes the costs of requiring major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting for area source facil ities. No emission reductions are expected as a result of area sources complying with the t esting, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for major sources. The testing and monitoring cost algorithm for PVConly process vents and PVC-combined process vents is presen ted in Attachment B and C respectively. The recordkeeping and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I.

Table 27. Summary of Costs for Major Source Testing, Monitorin g, Recordkeeping and

Reporting for Area Sources – Process Vents

Facility Initial Costs Annual Costs Total Costs

Testing and Monitoring ($) Recordkeeping

and Reporting ($) Testing and

Monitoring ($/yr) Recordkeeping

and Reporting ($/yr) Initial

Cost ($) Annual

Cost ($/yr) CertainTeed

- Lake Charles 43,198 4,963 8,640 2,250 48,161 10,890

OxyVinyls

- Deer Park 43,198 4,963 8,640 2,250 48,161 10,890



# The second option analyzed for process vents consiste d of area sources complying with the emission limits for existing major sources in addi tion to the testing and monitoring requirements for existing major sources. As shown in Tabl e 28, the CertainTeed Lake Charles facility does not meet the major source emission limi ts for PVC-only process vents; however, the OxyVinyls Deer Park facility meets the major source emi ssion limits for PVC-combined process vents. The cost of installing and operating a refrigerate d condenser at the CertainTeed Lake Charles facility was estimated. Emission reductions as a result of meeting the major source emission limits for PVC-only process vents were also calculated. Costs and emission reductions

24

# were estimated using the same methodology presented in th e memorandum titled “Revised Costs

and Emission Reductions for Major Sources in the Polyvi nyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category 5 

# .” The costs of installing and operating a refrigerated c ondenser are presented in Table 29. The cost effectiveness of existing area sources complying with the major source emission limits for PVC-only process vents is pr esented in Table 30. The analysis is presented in Attachment B.

Table 28. Summary of Existing Area Source Performance Compare d to Existing Major

Source Emission Limits – Process Vents

Facility Pollutant Average Facility Concentration Major

Source Emission Limit Percent

Reduction Required to Meet Major Source Limit Emission Reductions

as a Result of Meeting Major Source Limit (Tons/Year)

CertainTeed - Lake Charles (PVC-Only) VC (ppmv) 5.25 6.0 - 1.40E-02 [1] 

# CDD/CDF (TEQ) (ng/dscm) 3.11E-02 3.8E-02 - 3.17E-01 1 [1] 

# Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 73.7 56 24.0 2.57E-01

OxyVinyls - Deer Park (PVC-Combined) VC (ppmv) 1.93E-01 1.1 - - CDD/CDF (TEQ) (ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 5.1E-02 - - Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 4.02 9.8 - - [1] Emission reductions are a result of co-control TPY – Tons per year VC – Vinyl Chloride

CDD/CDF – Chlorinated dibenzodioxin and chlorinated dibenzofuran HAP – Hazardous air pollutants ppmv – parts per million on a dry volume basis, cor rected to 3 percent oxygen ng/dscm – nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, c orrected to 3 percent oxygen



# Table 29. Summary of Costs for Existing Area Sources Complying with Existing Major

Source Emission Limits for PVC-Only Process Vents

Facility Control Equipment Capital Cost ($) Control Equipment

Annualized Capital Costs ($/yr) Control Equipment

Annual Costs ($/yr) Total Annualized Costs ($/yr)

CertainTeed - Lake Charles (PVC-Only) 302,550 28,559 140,797 169,355

$ - Dollars $/yr - Dollars per year



# Table 30. Summary of Cost Effectiveness for Existing Area Sour ces Complying with Existing Major Source Emission Limits for PVC-Only Proces s Vents

Facility Total Annualized Costs [1] 

# ($/yr) Annual Emission

Reductions (as Total Organic HAP) (Tons/Year) Cost Effectiveness (Total Organic HAP Basis)

($/Ton)

CertainTeed - Lake Charles (PVC-Only) 180,245 2.57E -01 701,814

[1] Includes annual cost of testing, monitoring, re cordkeeping and reporting in addition to annualized control equipment costs HAP – Hazardous air pollutants $/yr – Dollars per year



# 6.1 Stripped Resins

25

# Two control options beyond the level of control curre ntly being used were evaluated for

each type of resin that could potentially be produced at exist ing area sources. The first option was requiring the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and repor ting requirements for major sources in addition to the level of control currently a vailable at existing area sources. The same methodology used to calculate testing, monitoring, recordkee ping and reporting costs for major sources was used for area sources and is described in a se parate memorandum 5 

# . Table 31 summarizes the costs of requiring major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting for area source facilities. No emission reductions are e xpected as a result of area sources complying with the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and repor ting requirements for major sources. The testing and monitoring cost algorithm for str ipped resins is presented in Attachment D. The recordkeeping and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I.

Table 31. Summary of Costs for Major Source Testing, Monitorin g, Recordkeeping and Reporting for Area Sources - Resins

Facility Initial Costs Annual Costs Total Costs

Testing and Monitoring ($) Recordkeeping

and Reporting ($) Testing and

Monitoring ($/yr) Recordkeeping

and Reporting ($/yr) Initial

Cost ($) Annual

Cost ($/yr) CertainTeed

- Lake Charles 1,803 2,516 7,212 3,403 4,319 10,615

OxyVinyls

- Deer Park 1,803 2,516 7,212 3,403 4,319 10,615

$ - Dollars $/yr – Dollars per year



# The second option analyzed for resins consisted of are a sources complying with the emission limits for existing major sources in addition to the testing and monitoring requirements for existing major sources. As shown in Table 32, all the levels of control currently available at existing area sources are below the major source resin limits for each resin type; therefore, no emission reductions or cost of controls were estimate d.

Table 32. Summary of Existing Area Source Performance Compare d to Existing Major Source Concentration Limits – Resins

Facility (Resin Type) Pollutant Average Facility Concentration (ppmw) Major Source

Concentration Limit (ppmw) Percent Reduction

Required to Meet Major Source Limit

CertainTeed - Lake Charles (Bulk) VC 7.1 7.1 -

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 160 170 -

OxyVinyls - Deer Park (Suspension) VC 8.64E-01 37 -

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 12.1 670 -

(Dispersion [1] 

# ) VC 534 1300 -

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 67.6 240 -

(Suspension Blending [1] 

# ) VC 15.7 140 -

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 64.2 500 -



# 26

# Facility (Resin Type) Pollutant Average Facility Concentration (ppmw) Major Source

Concentration Limit (ppmw) Percent Reduction

Required to Meet Major Source Limit

(Copolymer [1] 

# ) VC 361 790 -

Total Non-VC Organic HAP 893 1900 - 

# [1] - No existing area sources produce dispersion resin, sus pension blending resin, or copolymer resin. The average facility concentration from the least control led major source was used to model the average concentration of existing area sources. VC – Vinyl chloride Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total non-vinyl chloride organi c HAP HAP – Hazardous air pollutant ppmw – Parts per million by weight



# 6.3 Process and Maintenance Wastewater

Three control options beyond the level of control c urrently being used were evaluated for process and maintenance wastewater at existing area sourc es. The first option was requiring the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for major sources in addition to the level of control currently available at existing ar ea sources. The same methodology used to calculate testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting co sts for major sources was used for area sources and is described in a separate memorandum 5 

# . Table 33 summarizes the costs of requiring major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping a nd reporting for area source facilities. No emission reductions are expected as a result of area sources complying with the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for majo r sources. The testing and monitoring cost algorithm for wastewater is presented in A ttachment E. The recordkeeping and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I.

Table 33. Summary of Costs for Major Source Testing, Monitorin g, Recordkeeping and

Reporting for Area Sources - Wastewater

Facility Initial Costs Annual Costs Total Costs

Testing and Monitoring ($) Recordkeeping

and Reporting [1] 

# ($) Testing

and Monitorin g ($/yr) Recordkeeping

and Reporting ($/yr) Initial

Cost ($) Annual

Cost ($/yr)

CertainTeed

- Lake Charles 981 2,734 6,377 3,512 3,715 9,888

OxyVinyls

- Deer Park 981 2,734 6,377 3,512 3,715 9,888

[1] Costs for recordkeeping and reporting include development of a maintenance wastewater work practice plan $ - Dollars $/yr – Dollars per year



# The second option analyzed for wastewater consisted o f area sources complying with the emission limits for existing major sources in addition to the testing and monitoring requirements for existing major sources. As shown in Table 34, the lev el of control currently available at existing area sources is below the major source wastewa ter concentration limits; therefore, no emission reductions or cost of controls were estimate d for the second option.

27

# Table 34. Summary of Existing Area Source Performance Compare d to Existing Major

Source Concentration Limits – Process Wastewater

Facility Pollutant Average Facility Stripper Outlet Concentration Average

Uncontrolled Wastewater Concentration Existing

Major Source Concentration Limit

CertainTeed - Lake Charles VC (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.50E-03 6.8 Total Non-VC Organic HAP (ppmw) 0.018 [1] 

# 13.8 [3] 

# 110

OxyVinyls - Deer Park VC (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.50E-03 [2] 

# 6.8 Total Non-VC Organic HAP (ppmw) 0.018 13.8 [3] 

# 110

[1] Estimated based on average concentration of Oxy Vinyls Deer Park facility [2] Estimated based on average concentration of Cer tainTeed Lake Charles facility [3] Estimated based on average concentration of all major source facilities VC – Vinyl Chloride Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total non-vinyl chloride organic HAP HAP - Hazardous air pollutants ppmw – parts per million by weight



# The third option analyzed for wastewater consisted of area sources complying with the concentration limits for new major sources in additio n to the testing and monitoring requirements for existing major sources. As shown in Table 35, both fa cilities would be required to collect and treat previously uncontrolled wastewater streams in addi tion to further VC reduction in streams currently treated by the wastewater stripper. Using the same methodology described in the memorandum titled “Revised Beyond-the-Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category 6 

# ” costs were estimated for both existing area source facilities to install and maintain hard piping to convey previously uncontrolled streams to the wastewater collection system. The cost of insta lling and maintaining a wastewater stripper sized to accommodate the additional wastewater was also estimated. Emission reductions were estimated using the methodology presented in a separate m emorandum 6 

# . The costs of installing and operating hard piping and a new wastewater stripper at b oth existing area source facilities are presented in Table 36. The cost effectiveness of exis ting area sources complying with the major source wastewater concentration limits is prese nted in Table 37.The wastewater cost and emission reduction analysis is presented in Attachment E

.

Table 35. Summary of Existing Area Source Performance Compare d to New Major Source

Concentration Limits – Process Wastewater

Facility Pollutant Average Facility Stripper Outlet Concentration Average

Uncontrolled Wastewater Concentration New Major

Source Emission Limit Emission

Reductions as a Result of Meeting Major Source Limit (Tons/Year)

CertainTeed - Lake Charles VC (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.50E-03 2.8E-01 1.80E-06 Total Non-VC Organic HAP (ppmw) 0.018 [1] 

# 13.8 [3] 

# 1.8E-02 3.42

OxyVinyls - Deer Park VC (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.50E-03 [2] 

# 2.8E-01 8.55E-03 Total Non-VC Organic HAP (ppmw) 0.018 13.8 [3] 

# 1.8E-02 8.78

[1] Estimated based on average concentration of Oxy Vinyls Deer Park facility [2] Estimated based on average concentration of Cer tainTeed Lake Charles facility [3] Estimated based on average concentration of all major source facilities VC – Vinyl Chloride



# 28

# Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total non-vinyl chloride organic HAP HAP - Hazardous air pollutants ppmw – parts per million by weight



# Table 36. Summary of Costs for Existing Area Sources Complying with Major New Source

Concentration Limits for Process Wastewater

Facility Control Equipment

Capital Cost ($) Control Equipment

Annualized Capital Costs ($/yr) Control Equipment

Annual Costs ($/yr) Total Annualized Costs ($/yr)

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 4,312,496 407,064 588,5 83 995,647

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 8,050,612 759,910 1,221,056 1 ,980,967

$ - Dollars $/yr – Dollars per year



# Table 37. Summary of Cost Effectiveness for Existing Area Sour ces Complying with New Major Source Concentration Limits for Process Wastewater

Facility Total Annualized Costs [1] 

# ($/yr) Annual Emission

Reductions (as Total Organic HAP [2] 

# ) (Tons/Year) Cost Effectiveness (Total Organic HAP Basis)

($/Ton)

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 1,005,535 3.42 294,016

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 1,990,855 8.79 226,491

Total 2,966,390 12.2 245,516

[1] Includes annual cost of testing, monitoring, re cordkeeping and reporting in addition to annualized control equipment costs [2] Total Organic HAP includes VC TPY – Tons per year HAP – Hazardous air pollutants $ - Dollars $ /yr – Dollars per year



# 6.4 Equipment Leaks

For equipment leaks, the option of requiring area source s to comply with the existing major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting r equirements was analyzed. The cost and emission reductions of area sources complying wit h the LDAR program in 40 CFR part 63, subpart UU was estimated using the methodology presented in a separate memorandum 6 

# except that equipment counts provided by CertainTeed Lake Cha rles were substituted for existing area sources, where applicable; otherwise, equip ment counts from a simple complexity chemical facility were used. The cost of existing area sources installing a wireless electronic pressure relief device (PRD) monitoring system was also e stimated using the methodology presented in a separate memorandum 5 

# . Table 38 presents a summary of the costs of existing are a source facilities complying with 40 CFR part 63, subpart UU and installing wireless electronic PRD monitoring systems. The analysis for area sources c omplying with subpart UU and installing a wireless PRD monitoring system is presented i n Attachment G. The recordkeeping and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. Table 39 presents the emission reductions and cost effectiveness associated with existi ng area sources complying with subpart UU and installing a wireless electronic PRD monitoring sys tem.

29

# Table 38. Summary of Costs for Existing Area Sources Complying with Existing Major Source Equipment Leak Requirements

Facility Initial Costs ($) Annual Costs ($/yr) Total Costs

LDAR Capital

Cost of PRD System Initial

Recordkeeping and Reporting Annualized

Initial Cost of LDAR Annualized

Capital Cost of PRD System Annual

LDAR Cost [1] 

# Annual

Recordkeeping and Reporting Total

Initial Cost ($) Annualized

Cost ($/yr)

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 64,244 113,116 2,625 9,171 16,105 6,496 4,491 179,9 85 36,263

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 64,244 113,116 2,625 9,171 16,105 6,496 4,491 179,9 85 36,263

Total 128,488 226,232 5,250 18,341 32,210 12,993 8, 982 359,790 72,525



# [1] Incremental cost from subpart V to subpart UU $ - Dollars $/yr – Dollars per year



# Table 39. Summary of Cost Effectiveness for Existing Area Sour ces Complying with

Existing Major Source Equipment Leak Requirements

Facility Total

Annualized Cost ($/yr) Annual Emission

Reductions (as Total Organic HAP) (Tons/Year) Cost Effectiveness (Total Organic HAP Basis) ($/Ton)

CertainTeed - Lake Charles 36,263 4.64 7,807

OxyVinyls - Deer Park 36,263 4.64 7,807

Total 72,525 9.29 7,807

$ - Dollars $/yr – Dollars per year



# 6.5 Heat Exchange Systems

For heat exchangers, the option of requiring area sourc es to comply with the existing major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting r equirements was analyzed. The cost and emission reductions of area sources complying wit h the existing major source leak action level and monitoring interval was estimated using the methodology presented in a separate memorandum

6 

# . The heat exchanger analysis is presented in Attachment F. The recordkeeping and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. Table 40 presents the costs, emission reductions, and cost effectiveness of existing area sourc e facilities complying with the existing major source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting r equirements for heat exchange systems.

Table 39. Summary of Costs, Emission Reductions and Cost Effe ctiveness for Existing Area Sources Complying with Existing Major Source Heat Exchange Syst em Requirements

Facility Initial

Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost ($) Annual

Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost ($/yr) Annual Cost

of Repair [1] 

# ($/yr) Total Annual

Cost ($/yr) Total Organic

HAP Emission Reduction (TPY) Cost

Effectiveness (Total Organic HAP Basis) ($/Ton)

CertainTeed Lake Charles 3,713 4,164 8,600 12,764 3.67 3,478

OxyVinyls Deer Park 3,713 4,164 8,600 12,764 11.4 1,119



# 30

# Facility Initial Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost ($) Annual

Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost ($/yr) Annual Cost

of Repair [1] 

# ($/yr) Total Annual

Cost ($/yr) Total Organic

HAP Emission Reduction (TPY) Cost

Effectiveness (Total Organic HAP Basis) ($/Ton) Total 7,425 8,328 17,200 25,529 15.1 1,690 [1] – Cost of repair estimated at $4,300 per coolin g tower



# 6.6 Other Emission Sources

For other emission sources, the option of requiring ar ea sources to comply with the existing major source requirements was analyzed. Existing m ajor sources must comply with the equipment opening requirements from 40 CFR part 61, subpart F i n addition to work practices for gasholders (i.e., floating objects on the gasholder water seal). The current level of control for existing area sources is equivalent to 40 CFR part 61, subpart F for equipment openings; however, neither of the existing area sources use gashol ders in the production of PVC. Therefore, the costs and emission reductions for major source work practices applied to a gasholder at a model area source facility were estimate d using the same methodology presented in a separate memorandum 6 

# . The analysis of requiring major source work practices f or gasholders at existing area sources is presented in Attachm ent H. The recordkeeping and reporting cost algorithm is presented in Attachment I. Table 40 presents the costs, emission reductions, and cost effectiveness of existing area sourc e facilities complying with the existing major source requirements for other emission sources.

Table 40. Summary of Costs, Emission Reductions and Cost Effe ctiveness for Existing Area Sources Complying with Existing Major Source Other Emission Sources Requirements

Facility Capital

Cost of Gasholder Work Practice ($) Initial

Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost ($) Annualized

Capital Cost ($/yr) Annual

Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost ($/yr) Annual

Work Practice Cost ($/yr) Total

Initial Cost ($) Total Annual Cost ($/yr) Total

Organic HAP Emission Reduction (TPY) Cost

Effectiveness (Total Organic HAP Basis) ($/Ton)

CertainTeed Lake Charles - 1,102 - 1,554 - 1,102 1,554

- - OxyVinyls Deer Park - 1,102 - 1,554 - 1,102 1,554

- -

Model Area Source [2] 

# 5,000 1,102 928 1,554 550 6,102 3,032 0.62 4,922

Total [1] 

# - 2,204 - 3,108 - 2,204 3,108 - - [1] – Total costs do not include model area source. [2] – Model area source included in table for illus trative purposes. $ - Dollars $/yr – Dollars per year



# 6.7 Storage Vessels

For storage vessels, the option of requiring area sources to comply with the existing major source requirements was analyzed. No storage vesse ls meeting the subpart Kb criteria were identified at existing area sources. However, the t heoretical analysis of a 40,000 gallon tank storing methanol (with a resulting cost effectiveness be tween $2,000 and $12,000 per ton of HAP reduced) described in a separate memorandum 6 

# is applicable to area sources as well. Recordkeeping and reporting costs were estimated for existi ng area sources with a total initial cost of $1,102 per facility and a total annual cost of $1,554 per f acility. The recordkeeping and reporting cost analysis is presented in Attachment I.

31

# 7.0 Summary of Results

Table 41 presents a summary of annual emissions from exist ing area sources and the costs and emission reductions of control options beyond t he level of control currently available at existing area sources for process vents, wastewater, e quipment leaks, heat exchange systems, other emission sources, and storage vessels. Table 42 prese nts a summary of annual emissions from existing and model new area sources and the costs an d emission reductions of control options beyond the level of control currently availabl e at existing and model new area sources for resins. Table 43 presents a summary of annual emissio ns for a model new area source and the costs and emission reductions of control options beyond t he level of control currently available at a model new area source for process vents, wastewater, equipment leaks, heat exchange systems, other emission sources and storage vessels. Table 43 indic ates on which existing area source facility each emission point was based.

32Table 41. Existing Source GACT Analysis Summary for Process Vents, Wastewater, Equipment Leaks, Heat ExchangeSystems, Other Emission Sources and Storage VesselsEmission PointControl Option[1]Total Initial Cost($)Total AnnualCost ($/yr)Baseline Emission and Reductions[2](Tons/yr)Cost Effectiveness($/ton, Total OrganicHAP basis)VCCDD/CDF (g/yr)Total Organic HAPProcess Vents(PVC-Only)Baseline(Current Performance)5.8E-02 1.20E-04 1.07Option 1(Existing Major Source Testing andMonitoring)48,161[3]10,890[4]- - - -Option 2[5](Existing Major Source EmissionLimits)350,711 180,245 1.40E-02[6]2.87E-05 2.57E-01 701,814Process Vents(PVC-Combined)Baseline(Current Performance)2.79E-01 7.64E-03 4.61Option 1(Existing Major Source Testing andMonitoring)48,161[3]10,890[4]- - - -Option 2[5](Existing Major Source EmissionLimits)48,161[3]10,890[4]- - - -WastewaterBaseline(Current Performance)9.03E-01 - 13.1Option 1[7](Major Source Testing and Monitoring) 7,429 19,777- - - -Option 2[7](Existing Major Source ConcentrationLimits and Work Practices)7,429 19,777 - - - -Option 3[8(New Major Source ConcentrationLimits and Work Practices )12,370,537 2,996,390 8.55E-03 - 12.2 245,516EquipmentLeaks[9]Baseline(Current Level of Control - Subpart F/V)20.0Option 1[10](Existing Major Source Requirements) 359,970 72,525 - - 9.29 7,807HeatExchangers[11]Baseline(LDAR - 5000 ppb and monthlymonitoring)17.8 - 17.8Option 1(LDAR - Major Source 50 ppb andquarterly monitoring )7,425 25,529 15.1 - 15.1 1,691Other EmissionSourcesBaseline(Current Level of Control - Subpart F)3.4E-01 - 3.4E-01Option 1(Existing Major Source Requirements andWork Practices)2,204 3,108 - - - -Storage VesselsBaseline(Current Level of Control - No Control)3.4E-01 - 4.9E-01Option 1(Existing Major Source Requirements) 2,204 3,108 -- - 2,000-12,000[12][1] –For process vents, option 1 equals the testingand monitoring major source requirements for VC, CDD/CDF, and total organic HAP and option 2 equals the existing major source requirements. For wastewater, option 1 equalsthe testing and monitoring major source requirements for VC and total non-VC organic HAP, option 2 equals the existing major source major sources, and option 3 equals the new major source requirements. For equipment leaksand reactor openings, option 1 equals the existingmajor source requirements.[2] – Baseline emissions are shown for the level ofcontrol currently available at existing area sources. Total Organic HAP baselines and reductions include vinyl chloride.[3] – Total capital cost for process vents includesinitial record keeping and reporting costs (whichinclude year 1 annual costs) and initial process vent testing.[4] – Total annual costs for process vents includeprocess vent testing and annual record keeping andreporting (starting in year 2).



# 33[5] – Capital costs include 1)a condenser before the thermal oxidizer, 2) initial record keeping and reporting (which include year 1 annual costs), and 3) initial process vent testing. Annual costs include 1) the operation of thecondenser, 2) annual record keeping and reporting (starting in year 2) and 3) annual process vent testing.[6] – Vinyl chloride emission reductions are a co-result of dioxins/furans and Total Organic HAP reductions.[7] – Initial cost consists of initial uncontrolledstream testing for vinyl chloride and Total Non-VCOrganic HAP in additional to initial record keeping and reporting costs. Annual cost consists of monthly testing and monitoring forvinyl chloride and Total Non-VC Organic HAP in thewastewater stripper outlet flow, annual testing forvinyl chloride and total Non-VC Organic HAP at theuncontrolled streams, and annual record keeping and reporting costs. Noemission reductions are associated with the testingand monitoring cost. The testing and monitoring requirements also include development of a standard operating procedure for maintenance wastewater.[8] – Capital costs for wastewater include hard piping of previously uncontrolled streams, a new wastewater stripper, and initial testing and monitoringin addition to initial record keeping and reportingcosts. Annual costs forwastewater include controlling previously uncontrolled streams, annual testing and monitoring costs, and annual record keeping and reporting costs.[9] – Emissions and reductions of volatile organiccompounds (VOCs)/volatile hazardous air pollutants(VHAPs), and organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) categorized as Total Organic HAP. Emissions, reductions, andassociated costs referenced from memorandum - CindyHancy, RTI, to Jodi Howard, EPA/OAQPS, dated December 21, 2011, subject “Analysis of Emissions Reduction Techniques for Equipment Leaks.”. Baseline emissions,reductions, and costs are adjusted based on equipment counts provided by CertainTeed.[10] – Capital costs for equipment leaks include capital associated with complying with Subpart UU, the cost of an electronic PRD monitoring system, andthe initial record keeping and reporting requirements. Annual costs includeoperation of the PRD monitoring system, complying with Subpart UU, and annual record keeping and reporting costs.[11] – VOCs and vinyl chloride assumed to be totalorganic HAP.[12] – Emissions reductions and costs were calculated for retrofitting subpart WW controls on model fixed roof tanks meeting Subpart Kb vapor pressure and size parameters. The results of the analysis showed that costeffectiveness ranged from $2,000 to $12,000 per tonof HAP reduced by this option depending on the number of turnovers assumed. Based on information submitted by PVC production facilities, no storage vessels from affectedsources that meet the capacity levels storing materials that meet the vapor pressure levels were identified. Therefore, it was assumed that no storage vessels meeting capacity levels storing materials that meet the vapor pressurelevels would be constructed at a new source.CDD/CDF – Dioxins/Furans, toxic equivalency basis (TEQ)GACT – Generally Available Control Technologygr/yr – Grams per yearng/dscm – Nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, toxic equivalency basis(TEQ)ppmv – Parts per million, dry volume basis corrected to 3 percent oxygenppmw – Parts per million by weightTons/yr – Tons per yearTotal Organic HAP – Total Organic Hazardous air pollutants. Organic HAP (process vents) does not include hydrogen chloride (HCl). Total Organic HAP includes vinyl chloride, dioxins/furans, and all other organic HAP.Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total organic hazardousair pollutants not including vinyl chlorideVC – Vinyl Chloride$ - Dollars$/ton – Dollars per ton$/yr – Dollars per year



# 34Table 42. Existing and New Source GACT Analysis Summary forResinsResin TypeControl Option[1]Total Initial Cost($)Total AnnualCost ($/yr)Baseline Emission andReductions[2](tons/yr)Cost Effectiveness($/ton, Total OrganicHAP basis)VCTotal OrganicHAP[3]BulkBaseline(Current Performance)9.39E-01 6.51Option 1[4](Major Source Testing and Monitoring)4,319 10,615 - - -Option 2[4](Existing Source Concentration Limits)4,319 10,615 - - -SuspensionBaseline(Current Performance)2.38E-01 3.57Option 1[4](Major Source Testing and Monitoring)4,319 10,615 - - -Option 2[4](Existing Source Concentration Limits)4,319 10,615 - - -DispersionBaseline(Current Performance)1.17 1.32Option 1[4](Major Source Testing and Monitoring)4,319 10,615 - - -Option 2[4](Existing Source Concentration Limits)4,319 10,615 - - -Suspension BlendingBaseline(Current Performance)3.43E-02 1.75E-01Option 1[4](Major Source Testing and Monitoring)4,319 10,615 - - -Option 2[4](Existing Source Concentration Limits)4,319 10,615 - - -CopolymerBaseline(Current Performance)7.91E-01 2.75Option 1[4](Major Source Testing and Monitoring)4,319 10,615 - - -Option 2[4](Existing Source Concentration Limits)4,319 10,615 - - -[1] – For dispersion, suspension blending, and copolymer resins, baseline for existing area sources was determined to be the level of control of the least controlled major source in the applicable strippedresin subcategory. Option 1 is equivalent to baseline with the addition of major source testing and monitoring requirements. Option 2 consists of the existing major concentration limits in each resinsubcategory.[2] – Emission reductions are presented for Option2 where applicable. Emissions reductions are not applicable to Option 1 as there are no emission reductions associated with testing and monitoringonly.[3] – Total Organic HAP baseline and reductions include vinyl chloride.[4] – $4,700 consists of the initial testing, record keeping and reporting requirements. $10,615 consists of annual testing and monitoring for Total Non-VC Organic HAP in addition to annual recordkeeping and reporting costs.GACT – Generally Available Control Technologyppmw – Parts per million by weightTons/yr – Tons per yearTotal Non-VC Organic HAP – Total organic hazardousair pollutants not including vinyl



# 35chlorideVC – Vinyl Chloride$ - Dollars$/ton – Dollars per ton$/yr – Dollars per year



# 36Table 43. New Source GACT Analysis Summary for Process Vents, Wastewater, Equipment Leaks, Heat Exchange Systems,Other Emission Sources and Storage VesselsEmission PointControl Option[1]Total Initial Cost($)Total AnnualCost ($/yr)Baseline Emission and Reductions[2](Tons/yr)Cost Effectiveness($/ton, Total OrganicHAP basis)VCCDD/CDF (g/yr)Total Organic HAPProcess Vents(PVC-Only)Baseline(Current Performance – CertainTeedLake Charles)5.8E-02 1.20E-04 1.07Option 1(Existing Major Source Testing andMonitoring)48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - - -Option 2[5](Existing Major Source EmissionLimits)350,711 180,245 1.40E-02[6]2.87E-05 2.57E-01 701,814Process Vents(PVC-Combined)Baseline(Current Performance – OxyVinylsDeer Park)2.79E-01 7.64E-03 4.61Option 1(Existing Major Source Testing andMonitoring)48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - - -Option 2[5](Existing Major Source EmissionLimits)48,161[3] 10,890[4] - - - -WastewaterBaseline(Current Performance - OxyVinylsDeer Park)6.34E-01 - 9.44Option 1[7](Major Source Testing andMonitoring)3,715 9,888- - -Option 2[7](Existing Major SourceConcentration Limits and Work Practices)3,715 9,888 - - - -Option 3[8(New Major Source ConcentrationLimits and Work Practices )8,054,327 1,988,368 1.31E-01 - 8.91 223,169Equipment Leaks[9]Baseline(Current Level of Control - SubpartF/V - OxyVinyls Deer Park)10Option 1[10](Existing Major SourceRequirements)179,985 36,263 - - 4.64 7,807HeatExchangers[11]Baseline(LDAR - 5000 ppb and monthlymonitoring - OxyVinyls Deer Park)12.5 - 12.5Option 1(LDAR - Major Source 50 ppb andquarterly monitoring )3,713 12,764 11.4 - 11.4 1,117Other EmissionSourcesBaseline(Current Level of Control - SubpartF - Model Area Source Presented in Section6.0)1.18 - 1.19Option 1(Existing Major SourceRequirements and Work Practices)6,102 3,032 6.16E-01 - 6.16E-01 4,922Storage VesselsBaseline(Current Level of Control - NoControl - OxyVinyls Deer Park)3.36E-01 - 4.92E-01Option 1(Existing Major SourceRequirements)1,102 1,554 - - - 2,000-12,000[12][1] –For process vents, option 1 equals the testingand monitoring major source requirements for VC, CDD/CDF, and total organic HAP and option 2 equals the existing major source requirements. For wastewater, option 1 equalsthe testing and monitoring major source requirements for VC and total non-VC organic HAP, option 2 equals the existing major source major sources, and option 3 equals the new major source requirements. For equipment leaksand reactor openings, option 1 equals the existingmajor source requirements. The facility basis for emissions and costs estimates for the model area source is provided in the “Baseline” explanation.[2] – Baseline emissions are shown for the level ofcontrol currently available at existing area sources. Total Organic HAP baselines and reductions include vinyl chloride.[3] – Total capital cost for process vents includesinitial record keeping and reporting costs (whichinclude year 1 annual costs) and initial process vent testing.



# 37[4] – Total annual costs for process vents includeprocess vent testing and annual record keeping andreporting (starting in year 2).[5] – Capital costs include 1)a condenser before the thermal oxidizer, 2) initial record keeping and reporting (which include year 1 annual costs), and 3) initial process vent testing. Annual costs include 1) the operation of thecondenser, 2) annual record keeping and reporting (starting in year 2) and 3) annual process vent testing.[6] – Vinyl chloride emission reductions are a co-result of dioxins/furans and Total Organic HAP reductions.[7] – Initial cost consists of initial uncontrolledstream testing for vinyl chloride and Total Non-VCOrganic HAP in additional to initial record keeping and reporting costs. Annual cost consists of monthly testing and monitoring forvinyl chloride and Total Non-VC Organic HAP in thewastewater stripper outlet flow, annual testing forvinyl chloride and total Non-VC Organic HAP at theuncontrolled streams, and annual record keeping and reporting costs. Noemission reductions are associated with the testingand monitoring cost. The testing and monitoring requirements also include development of a standard operating procedure for maintenance wastewater.[8] – Capital costs for wastewater include hard piping of previously uncontrolled streams, a new wastewater stripper, and initial testing and monitoringin addition to initial record keeping and reportingcosts. Annual costs forwastewater include controlling previously uncontrolled streams, annual testing and monitoring costs, and annual record keeping and reporting costs.[9] – Emissions and reductions of volatile organiccompounds (VOCs)/volatile hazardous air pollutants(VHAPs), and organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) categorized as Total Organic HAP. Emissions, reductions, andassociated costs referenced from memorandum - CindyHancy, RTI, to Jodi Howard, EPA/OAQPS, dated December 21, 2011, subject “Analysis of Emissions Reduction Techniques for Equipment Leaks.” Baseline emissions,reductions, and costs are adjusted based on equipment counts provided by CertainTeed.[10] – Capital costs for equipment leaks include capital associated with complying with Subpart UU, the cost of an electronic PRD monitoring system, andthe initial record keeping and reporting requirements. Annual costs includeoperation of the PRD monitoring system, complying with Subpart UU, and annual record keeping and reporting costs.[11] – VOCs and vinyl chloride assumed to be totalOrganic HAP.[12] – Emissions reductions and costs were calculated for retrofitting subpart WW controls on model fixed roof tanks meeting Subpart Kb vapor pressure and size parameters. The results of the analysis showed that costeffectiveness ranged from $2,000 to $12,000 per tonof HAP reduced by this option depending on the number of turnovers assumed. Based on information submitted by PVC production facilities, no storage vessels from affectedsources that meet the capacity levels storing materials that meet the vapor pressure levels were identified. Therefore, it was assumed that no storage vessels meeting capacity levels storing materials that meet the vapor pressurelevels would be constructed at a new source.CDD/CDF – Dioxins/Furans, toxic equivalency basis (TEQ)GACT – Generally Available Control Technologygr/yr – Grams per yearng/dscm – Nanograms per dry standard cubic meter, toxic equivalencybasis (TEQ)ppmv – Parts per million, dry volume basis corrected to 3 percentoxygenppmw – Parts per million by weightTons/yr – Tons per yearTotal Organic HAP – Total Organic Hazardous air pollutants. Organic HAP (process vents) does not include hydrogen chloride (HCl). Total Organic HAP includes vinyl chloride, dioxins/furans, and all other organic HAP.Total Non-VC Organic HAP – Total organic hazardousair pollutants not including vinyl chlorideVC – Vinyl Chloride$ - Dollars$/ton – Dollars per ton$/yr – Dollars per year



# 38

# 8.0 References

1. “Information Collection for the Polyvinyl Chloride and C opolymers (PVC) Production Source Category.” Memorandum from Eastern Research G roup, Inc. To Jodi Howard, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 2012.

2. “Revised Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Flo or Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category.” Memorandum from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 2012.

3. “Data and procedure for handling below detection level data in analyzing various pollutant emissions database for MACT and RTR emission limits.” Memorandum from Peter Westlin, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, to Sector Policies and Programs Division Management and Technical Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. December 13, 2011.

4. “Revised Baseline Emission Estimates for Major Sources in the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category.” Memorandum from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 2012.

5. “Revised Costs and Emission Reductions for Major Sources i n the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category.” Memorandu m from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S. Environmental P rotection Agency. February 2012.

6. “Revised Beyond-the-Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chl oride and Copolymers (PVC) Production Source Category.” Memorandum from Eastern Re search Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 2012.

39

# Attachments

Attachment A. CertainTeed Lake Charles and OxyVinyls Deer P ark Operating Permits

Attachment B. GACT Analysis for PVC-Only Process Vent s

Attachment C. GACT Analysis for PVC-Combined Process Ve nts

Attachment D. GACT Analysis for Stripped Resins

Attachment E. GACT Analysis for Process and Maintenanc e Wastewater

Attachment F. GACT Analysis for Heat Exchange Systems

Attachment G. GACT Analysis for Equipment Leaks

Attachment H. GACT Analysis for Other Emission Sources

Attachment I. Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost Estimation f or Area Sources

Attachment J. Storage Vessel Information Provided in Faci lity Survey

40

# Attachment A

CertainTeed Lake Charles and OxyVinyls Deer Park Operating Permits

41

# 42

# 43

# 44

# 45

# 46

# 47

# 48

# 49

# 50

# 51

# 52

# 53

# 54

# 55

# 56

# 57

# 58

# 59

# 60

# 61

# 62

# 63

# 64

# 65

# 66

# 67

# 68

# 69

# 70

# 71

# 72

# 73

# 74

# 75

# 76

# 77

# 78

# 79

# 80

# 81

# 82

# 83

# 84

# 85

# 86

# 87

# Attachment B

GACT Analysis for PVC-Only Process Vents

88ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012**	





 ** Calculated GACT Limits for Process Vents - PVC OnlyCalculated LimitsArea Source Current Level ofPerformance (CTLCAverages)Existing Source - Current Levelof Control Calculted Limits(CTLC w/ Variability)New Source Current Level ofPerformanceNew Source(Least Controlled MACT Sourcew/ Variability)Vinyl Chloride (ppmv)5.24E+00 5.30E+00 5.24E+00 5.30E+00Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm)3.11E-02 1.30E-01 3.11E-02 1.30E-01Total Organic HAP(ppmv)7.37E+01 1.40E+02 7.37E+01 1.40E+02THC (ppmvd as propane)1.66E+01 4.53E+01 1.66E+01 4.53E+01Existing Source GACT Summary for Process Vents - PVC OnlyPollutantArea Source Current Level ofPerformance (CTLCAverages)Option 1 Limit(Major Source Requirement)Baseline Emissions - Based on CTLCAverage Concentration (TPY)Emission Reductions as a Resultof Complying w/ Major SourceReqs (TPY)Vinyl Chloride (ppmv)5.24E+00 6.00E+00 5.84E-02 1.40E-02Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm)3.11E-02 3.80E-02 1.32E-10 3.17E-11Total Organic HAP(ppmv)7.37E+01 5.60E+01 1.07E+00 2.57E-01New Source GACT Summary for Process Vents - PVC OnlyPollutantNew Area Source CurrentLevel of Performance (Modelnew Source Avg.Concentrations)Option 1 Limit(Existing Source MACT)Baseline Emissions - Based on CTLCAverage Concentration (TPY)Emission Reductions as a Resultof Complying w/ Major SourceReqs (TPY)Vinyl Chloride (ppmv)5.24E+00 6.00E+00 5.84E-02 1.40E-02Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm)3.11E-02 3.80E-02 1.32E-10 3.17E-11Total Organic HAP(ppmv)7.37E+01 5.60E+01 1.07E+00 2.57E-01**




  !"#

$%
** **& '** **(
**	


 !**(

****)*+&,-+****
**"
#$!"
	

%%"
#&'"
'$!"
**
****&*.-,-+**Compliance with Major Source Requirements Cost Summary%()*+,-./0*-0	
1("
2&0*-0,
#



# 89ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012	

	
	

	New and Existing GACT VC Floor (CertainTeed Lake Charles)New and Existing GACT CDD/CDF on a TEQ Basis (CertainTeed Lake Charles)FacilityRunConc(PPMV @ 3% O2)LN Conc (PPMV @ 3%O2)DL averagerun valueDL for MaxSortingFacility RunTEQ Conc (ng/dscm@ 3% O2)LN(TEQ)			Normal LNNormal LNSample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Sample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Non-Detects 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Average 3.11E-02 -3.56E+00Average 5.24E+00 1.66E+00Median 2.29E-02 -3.78E+00Median 5.24E+00 1.66E+00Standard Deviation 1.73E-02 5.15E-01Standard Deviation 1.00E-02 1.91E-03Minimum 1.94E-02 -3.94E+00Minimum 5.23E+00 1.65E+00Maximum 5.09E-02 -2.98E+00Maximum 5.25E+00 1.66E+00Skewness 1.65E+00 1.53E+00Skewness 0.00E+00 -2.86E-03SE Skewness 1.41E+001.41E+00SE Skewness 1.41E+001.41E+00Skewness Test NormalNormalSkewness Test NormalNormalKurtosisKurtosisSE Kurtosis 2.83E+002.83E+00SE Kurtosis 2.83E+002.83E+00Kurtosis TestKurtosis Test99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+006.96E+0099.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+006.96E+0099.0% UPL 1.29E-015.30E-0199.0% UPL 5.30E+005.30E+00average in variability analysis 3.11E-02ng/dscm @ 3% O2average in variability analysis 5.24E+00PPMVD @ 3% O2RDL	ng/dscm @ 3% O2RDL1.84E-01PPMVD @ 3% O23 x RDL	ng/dscm @ 3% O23 x RDL5.52E-01PPMVD @ 3% O299.0% UPL1.29E-01ng/dscm @ 3% O299.0% UPL5.30E+00PPMVD @ 3% O2Area Source w/ Variability1.30E-01ng/dscm @ 3% O2Area Source w/ Variability5.30E+00PPMVD @ 3% O2





 
!""
#

$$%
&&"
&"' &# 
'(
 




 
&&"
&"
' &# 
'
%) %
&"
' "'#
"*+





 
 
#
&"
,
&

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'(
 

$$%&&"
&"
' &# 
'






 
 
#
&"
,
&

$$%
&&"
&"' &# 
'(
 
$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'






 
!""
#

$$%
&&"
&"
'&# 
'(
 





&&"
&"
' &# 
'
%) %
&"
' "'#
"*+



# 90ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012	

	
	

	New and Existing Source GACT Floor for Total Organic HAP (CertainTeed Lake Charles)Facility RunConc (PPMV @ 3% O2)LN Conc (PPMV @ 3%O2)DL averagerun valueDL for MaxSorting				Normal LNSample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Non-Detects 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Average 7.37E+01 4.29E+00Median 7.55E+01 4.32E+00Standard Deviation 1.07E+01 1.49E-01Minimum 6.22E+01 4.13E+00Maximum 8.34E+01 4.42E+00Skewness -7.36E-01 -9.07E-01SE Skewness 1.41E+001.41E+00Skewness Test NormalNormalKurtosisSE Kurtosis 2.83E+002.83E+00Kurtosis Test99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+006.96E+0099.0% UPL 1.35E+021.71E+02average in variability analysis 7.37E+01ppmvd @ 3% O2RDL1.84E-01ppmvd @ 3% O23 x RDL5.52E-01ppmvd @ 3% O299.0% UPL1.35E+02ppmvd @ 3% O2Area Source w/ Variability1.40E+02ppmvd @ 3% O2





 
!""
#

$$%
&&"
&"' &# 
'(
 




 
&&"
&"
' &# 
'
%) %
&"
' "'#
"*+





 
 
#
&"
,
&

$$%
&&"
&"
' &# 
'(
 

$$%&&"
&"
' &# 
'




# 91ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012	

	
	

	THC - PVC Only - Existing Area SourceCompany Facility Compound_Std Method Run Date Value Ln ValueCertainTeed Lake Charles THC EPA Method 25A 1 1/26/2010 15.28 2.726544784CertainTeed Lake Charles THC EPA Method 25A 2 1/26/2010 12.36 2.514465452CertainTeed Lake Charles THC EPA Method 25A 3 1/26/2010 22.19 3.099641737Average16.61Normal LNSample Size 3 3Compliance Avg 3 3Average 16.6100 2.7802Median15.28 2.727Standard Deviation 5.05 0.296Minimum 12.36 2.514Maximum 22.19 3.100Skewness 1.10 0.79SE Skewness 1.411.41Skewness Test NormalNormalKurtosis* *SE Kurtosis 2.832.83Kurtosis Test **99.0% t-statistic for UL 4.544.5499.0% UL 39.5361.89599.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.966.9699.0% UPL 45.3286.912RDL0.85 PPMVD @ 3% O23x RDL2.535 PPMVD @ 3% O299.0% UL 39.5 PPMVD @ 3% O299.0% UPL 45.3 PPMVD @ 3% O2* Cannot perform Kurtosis test.THC Variability Analysis - PVC ONLY (Existing)ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2Units



# 92ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012	


		
			Major Source Requirements (Existing PVC Only MACT Floor)	
 
  	
  	
 
  !" 	
 # TotalReductionsOutlet Max Flow Rate(DSCMM)Average O2(%)Avg.Temp(C)Vinyl Chloride(ppmvd @ 3%O2)HCl(ppmvd @ 3%O2)CDD/CDF(ng/dscm @3%O2)TotalHAP(ppmvd @3%O2)Inlet Max FlowRate (DSCMM)Average O2(%)Avg. Temp(C)VinylChloride(ppmvd @3%O2)CE ReduxEffyVinylChloride(lbs/hr)VC$ %&' ()HCl$ %&' ()CDD/CDF$ %&' ()TOHAP$ %&' ()VC$ %&!	 *)HCl$ %&!	 *)CDD/CDF(TEQ)$ %&!	 *)TOHAP$ %&!	 *)VC -+
,-	.-	
/%%-HCl0+
,-	.-	
/%%-CDD/CDF0+
,-	.-	
/%%-TOHAP -+
,-	.-	
/%%-VC HCl CDD/CDF TOHAP Tons/yr-%!/1( 	
 
2345 5
6345 #
75345 #
234 
5530 7
7345 #
#34 
30 
27345 6
#6342 5
34 
34 5
630 
34 
523055 
##305 #
230 34 5
305 5
734
2345 5
230 
34 
573055 
#7305 
#7305
730# 8&)Facility ClassificationOutlet ConditionsInlet ConditionsReductions (Tons/yr)Baseline Emissions Estimates"-+
-%	 9-	.-		



# 93

# ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Refrigerated Condenser Package for PVC-Only Process Vents

Certain Teed Lake Charles PVC-Only

-- Inlet stream flowrate (DSCMM): 

### 

-- Inlet stream flowrate (scfm): (Qin) =DSCMM/35.31 

### 2.00E+02

-- Inlet stream temperature (oC): 

### 

-- Inlet stream temperature (oF): (Tin) =oC*1.8+32 

### 1.48E+02

-- VOC to be condensed: 

### Vinyl chloride

-- VOC inlet volume fraction:(Yvoc,in) =ppm/1E6 

### 


-- Required VOC removal (fraction): (n) 

### 

-- Antoine equation constants for VOC: [4]

A: 

### 6.50E+00

B: 

### 7.83E+02

C: 

### 2.30E+02

-- VOC heat of condensation (BTU/lb-mole): ( **** Hvoc,r) 

### 1.01E+04

-- VOC heat capacity (BTU/lb-mole-oF): (Cp,voc) 

### 1.17E+01

-- Coolant specific heat (BTU/lb-oF): Cp,cool 

### 6.50E-01

-- VOC boiling point (oF): (Tboil) 

### 6.53E+00

-- VOC critical temperature (oR): (Tc) 

### 7.73E+02

-- VOC molecular weight (lb/lb-mole): (MWvoc) 

### 6.25E+01

-- VOC condensate density (lb/gal): 

### 8.15E+00

-- Air heat capacity (BTU/lb-mole-oF): (Cp,air) 

### 6.95E+00

DESIGN PARAMETERS:

-- Outlet VOC partial pressure (mm Hg): (Pvoc) =760*(Yvoc,in*(1-n)/(1-Yvoc,in*n)) 

### 5.67E+01

-- Condensation temperature, Tc (oF): (Tcon) =(B/(A-log10(Pvoc))-C)*1.8+32 

### -8.48E+01

(oR): =Tcon+460 

### 3.75E+02

-- VOC flowrate in (lb-moles/hr): (Mvoc,in) =Qin*Yvoc,in*60/392 

### 2.93E+00

-- VOC flowrate out (lb-moles/hr): (Mvoc,out) =Mvoc,in*(1-n) 

### 2.23E+00

-- VOC condensed (lb-moles/hr): (Mvoc,con) =Mvoc,in-Mvoc,out 

### 7.03E-01

(lb/hr): (Lb/hrvoc,con) =Mwvoc*Mvoc,con 

### 4.40E+01

-- VOC heat of condensation @ Tc (BTU/lb-mole): ( **** Hvoc) =( **** Hvoc,r)*[(1-Tcon/Tc)/(1-Tboil/Tc)]^0.38 

### 1.11E+04

-- Enthalpy change, condensed VOC (BTU/hr): ( **** Hcon) =Mvoc,con[ **** Hvoc+Cp,voc(Tin-Tcon) 

### 9.74E+03

-- Enthalpy change, uncondensed VOC (BTU/hr):( **** Huncon) =Mvoc,out*Cp,voc*(Tin-Tcon) 

### 6.05E+03

-- Enthalpy change, air (BTU/hr): ( **** Hnoncon) =Cp,air*(Tin-Tcon)*(Qin*60/392-Mvoc,in) 

### 4.48E+04

-- Condenser heat load (BTU/hr): (Hload) = **** Hcon+ **** huncon+ **** Hnoncon 

### 6.06E+04

-- Heat transfer coefficient, U (BTU/hr-ft2-oF): Estimate from OAQPS Manual 

### 2.00E+01

-- Log-mean temperature difference (oF): Tlm =(Tin-Tcon-25)/ln((Tin-Tcon-10)/15) 

### 7.71E+01

-- Condenser surface area (ft2): (Acon) =Hload/U*Tlm 

### 3.93E+01

-- Coolant flowrate (lb/hr): =Hload/(Cp,cool*(Tcon-15+25)-(Tcon-15)) 

### 3.73E+03

-- Refrigeration capacity (tons): (R) =Hload/1200 

### 5.05E+00

-- Electricity requirement (kW/ton) [6]: (kW) =-9E-06(Tco n)^3 - 0.0004(Tcon)2 - 0.0331(Tcon) + 3.560 

### 8.97E+00

CAPITAL COSTS

Equipment Costs ($):

-- Refrigeration unit/single-stage (< 10 tons): (Rs s<10) =exp(9.83-0.014Tcon+0.340lnR) 

### 1.06E+05

-- Refrigeration unit/single-stage (> 10 tons): (Rs s>10) =exp(9.26-0.007Tcon+0.627lnR) 

### 0.00E+00

-- Multistage refrigeration unit: (Mru) exp(9.73-0.012Tcon+0.584lnR) 

### 1.20E+05

Total equipment cost ($)--base: (ECp) =1.25*MAX(Rss<10,Rss>10,Mru) 

### 1.50E+05

Cost Index

a. 2010 CE Equip (Feb Final) CE Equipment index (Feb 2010 Final) 

### 6.41E+02

b. 1990 CE Equip (Oct Final) CE Equipment index (Oct 1990 Final) 

### 3.94E+02

' ' ' ' --escalated: (ECpe) =(ECp)*(FebFinal/OctFinal) 

### 2.44E+05

Purchased Equipment Cost ($): (PECp) =ECpe*1.08 

### 2.63E+05

Total Capital Investment ($): (TCI) =PECp*1.15 

### 3.03E+05 INPUT PARAMETERS: Equation



# 94

# ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Refrigerated Condenser Package for PVC-Only Process Vents

ANNUAL COST INPUTS:

Operating factor (hr/yr): (OF) 

### 8.40E+03

Operating labor rate ($/hr): (LR) 

### 3.46E+01

Maintenance labor rate ($/hr): (MR) 

### 3.81E+01

Operating labor factor (hr/sh): (OLF) 1/2 hour per 8 hour shift 

### 5.00E-01

Maintenance labor factor (hr/sh): (MLF) 1/2 hour per 8 hour shift 

### 5.00E-01

Electricity price ($/kWhr): (EP) 

### 7.00E-02

Recovered VOC value ($/lb)[5]: (Rvoc) 

### 0.00E+00

Annual interest rate (fraction): (Int) 

### 7.00E-02

Control system life (years): (EL) 

### 2.00E+01

Capital recovery factor: (CRF) =Int*(1+Int)^EL/((1+Int)^EL-1) 

### 9.44E-02

Taxes, insurance, admin. factor: (TaxF) 

### 4.00E-02

ANNUAL COSTS:

Item 

### Cost ($/yr)

Operating labor =OF/8*OLF*LR 

### 1.82E+04

Supervisory labor =.15*Operating Labor 

### 2.72E+03

Maintenance labor =OF/8*MLF*MR 

### 2.00E+04

Maintenance materials 100% of maintenance labor 

### 2.00E+04

Electricity =EP*OF*kW*R/0.85 

### 3.13E+04

Overhead =.60*(Operating Labor+Supervisory Labor+Maint Labor +Maint Materials) 

### 3.65E+04

Taxes, insurance, administrative =TaxF*TCI 

### 1.21E+04

Capital recovery =CRF*TCI 

### 2.86E+04

Total Annual Cost (without credits) (TACwoc) =sum of all annual costs 

### 1.69E+05

Recovery credits (RC) =-Rvoc*OF*Lb/hrvoc,con 

### 0.00E+00

Total Annual Cost (with credits) =TACwoc+RC 

### 1.69E+05



# 

 !"# $% 	



&" ' (')! *$ *+ ()$ ","- !" '. 
*"$*%-/")0)1#223332+2#"2
2+'" #" $2 (#"1. 1	4*+(5
2 65&	&2".7-"'"!.!.$."*%-0 "0 /"&	0#  (".   !8. 1" "'1/'9
")$ '! ""'$ :(



# 95ATTACHMENT B - PVC ONLY PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012Process Vents Emission Testing CostsParameters/CostsEquation Values Testing Freq.* Annual Cost of TestAnnualized Cost of InitialTestTAC of TestingA. Parameters1. CE Plant Cost indexa. 2010 (Feb 10 Final CE Index)539.1b. 2009 (Annual CE Index)521.9c. 1992 (Annual CE Index)358.2B. Testing Costs, $1. Method 1 or 1A Included as part of M 23 -$2. Method 26 (HCl) = $5,000 x (539.1/358.2)3. Method 23 (CDD/CDF) = $21,000 x (539.1/358.2) - $5,000 $27,0004. Method 25A (THC) =$6,000x(539.1/521.9) $6,198		5. Method 18 (Assumed cost equal to 0031)$10,000C.CRF (20 yr, 7%): (0.07*(1+0.07)^20)/((1+0.07)^20-1)0.09439D. Facility Totals1.TOH, &VC3,240$2. CDD/CDF5,400$3. Facility Total$ 43,197.748,640$* Number of Years Between TestsNote:3. E-mail from Jason Dewees, EPA, to Mary Johnson, EPA. August 20, 2008. Re: Monitoring Options for SNCR & Test Cost Questions.4. Conversation with Ray Merrill, ERG - 11/5/2010.5. Email from Peter Westlin, EPA 4/8/2011 to ERG: Method 18 Costs1. Initial testing costs to be annualized over 20 years at 7% interest.2. Testing costs have been rounded to the nearest $1,000 to be consistent with level of rounding in original costs; costs also adjusted based on additionalinformation from EPA.Sources:1. Memorandum from R. Segall, EPA/EMB, to R. Copland, EPA/SDB. October 14, 1992. Medical Waste Incinerator Study: Emission Measurement and Continuous Monitoring. (II-B-89)2. E-mail from Jason Dewees, EPA, to Peter Westlin,EPA. August 20, 2008. Monitoring Options for SNCR& Test Cost Questions.



# 96

# Attachment C

GACT Analysis for PVC-Combined Process Vents

97

# ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

# 

Calculated GACT Limits for Process Vents - PVC Comb ined

Calculated Limits Area Source Current

Level of Performance (OVDP Averages) Existing Source -

Current Level of

Control Calculted Limits (OVDP w/ New Source Current

Level of Performance New Source

Current Level of Control

Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 1.93E-01 5.60E-01 1.93E-01 5.60E-01 Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 7.60E-02 1.53E-02 7.60E-02 Total Organic HAP (ppmv) - Based on WLG since OVDP 

# did not test for TOHAP 2nd round 114) 4.02E+00 2.90E+01 4.02E+00 2.90E+01

THC (ppmvd as propane) 1.10E-01 2.30E+00 1.10E-01 2.30E+00



# Existing Source GACT Summary for Process Vents - PV C Combined

Pollutant Area Source Current

Level of Performance (OVDP Averages) Option 1 Limit (Major Source Requirements) Baseline Emissions -

Based on OVDP 

# Average Concentrations (TPY) Emission Reductions as a

Result of Complying w/ Major Source Requirements (TPY) Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 1.93E-01 1.10E+00 2.79E-01 - Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 5.10E-02 8.42E-09 - Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 4.02E+00 9.80E+00 4.61E+00 -



# New Source GACT Summary for Process Vents - PVC Com bined

Pollutant New Area Source

Current Level of Performance (Model new Source Avg. 

# Concentrations) Option 1 Limit (Major Source Requirements) Baseline Emissions -

Based on Model New Source Average Concentrations (TPY) Emission Reductions as a Result of Complying w/ Major Source Requirements (TPY)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmv) 1.93E-01 1.10E+00 2.79E-01 - Dioxins/Furans (TEQ - ng/dscm) 1.53E-02 5.10E-02 8.42E-09 - Total Organic HAP (ppmv) 4.02E+00 9.80E+00 4.61E+00 -



# 	

	
   

# !"#$



 		

! "# %&'()*% 
+	
 %&,-)*'


	

 

		
 	.
		

! 	

! 	.
/		
 (



# ! 		
 0&-%)*' 	
+	
 (&(1)*'


		  MACT Floor Cost Summary



# !2	

		$	
 344	 (!	5/	44 
	



# 98ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012	

	
	


		
		
	Facility RunConc (PPMV @3% O2)LN Conc (PPMV@ 3% O2)DLaveragerun valueDL for MaxSortingFacility RunTEQ Conc(ng/dscm @3% O2)LN(TEQ)	



	



	



	



	



	

Normal LNNormal LNSample Size 3.00 3.00Sample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Non-Detects 3.00 3.00Average 1.53E-02 -4.33E+00Average 1.93E-01 -1.65Median 1.07E-02 -4.54E+00Median 1.93E-01 -1.65Standard Deviation 1.06E-02 6.50E-01Standard Deviation 3.40E-17 0Minimum 7.89E-03 -4.84E+00Minimum 1.93E-01 -1.65Maximum 2.74E-02 -3.60E+00Maximum 1.93E-01 -1.65Skewness 1.60E+00 1.32E+00SkewnessSE Skewness 1.41E+001.41E+00SE Skewness 1.41 1.41Skewness Test NormalNormalSkewness Test Normal NormalKurtosisKurtosisSE Kurtosis 2.83E+002.83E+00SE Kurtosis 2.83 2.83Kurtosis Test NormalNormalKurtosis Test Normal Normal99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+006.96E+0099.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96 6.9699.0% UPL 7.55E-025.34E-0199.0% UPL 1.93E-01 1.93E-01average in variability analysis1.53E-02average in variability analysis1.93E-013x RDL3.35E-02RDL1.84E-0199.0% UPL7.55E-023 x RDL5.52E-01New Source GACT Limit7.60E-02ng/dscm @ 3% O299.0% UPL1.93E-01New Source GACT Limit 5.60E-01 PPMVD @ 3% O2
 !" ""#$%&! $' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" ) !
 !"+%%#' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"
 !" $$%$%)""$#" )(,!"($%)"!%)#%- .
 !" ""#$%&! $' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" ) !
 !"+%%#' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!" !" $$%$%)""$#" )(,!"($%)"!%)#%- .	
	 !"#
	



# 99ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012	

	
	


		
	$%
	Facility RunConc (PPMV @ 3%O2)LN Conc (PPMV @3% O2)DL averagerun valueDL for MaxSorting/0
/0				/0	
	
		Normal LNSample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Non-Detects 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Average 4.02E+00 1.00E+00Median 1.93E+00 6.59E-01Standard Deviation 4.28E+00 1.06E+00Minimum 1.17E+00 1.58E-01Maximum 8.94E+00 2.19E+00Skewness 1.67E+00 1.31E+00SE Skewness 1.41E+001.41E+00Skewness Test NormalNormalKurtosisSE Kurtosis 2.83E+002.83E+00Kurtosis Test NormalNormal99.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+006.96E+0099.0% UPL 2.84E+011.13E+03average in variability analysis 4.02E+00RDL1.81E+003 x RDL5.42E+0099.0% UPL2.84E+01New Source GACT Limit2.90E+01ppmvd @ 3% O2
 !" ""#$%&! $' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" ) !
 !"+%%#' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"
 !" $$%$%)""$#" )(,!"($%)"!%)#%- .



# 100ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012	

	
	


	THC PVC Combined - Existing Area SourceCompany Facility Compound_Std Method Run Date Value Ln ValueOxyVinyls Deer Park THC EPA Method 25A 1 8/31/2011 1.10E-01-2.21E+00OxyVinyls Deer Park THC EPA Method 25A 2 8/31/2011 1.10E-01-2.21E+00OxyVinyls Deer Park THC EPA Method 25A 3 8/31/2011 1.10E-01-2.21E+00Average1.10E-01Note: All Values Reported as NDNormal LNSample Size 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Compliance Avg 3.00E+00 3.00E+00Average 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00Median 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00Standard Deviation 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Minimum 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00Maximum 1.10E-01 -2.21E+00SkewnessSE Skewness 1.41E+001.41E+00Skewness TestKurtosisSE Kurtosis 2.83E+002.83E+00Kurtosis Test99.0% t-statistic for UL 4.54E+004.54E+0099.0% UL 1.10E-011.10E-0199.0% t-statistic for UPL 6.96E+006.96E+0099.0% UPL 1.10E-011.10E-01average in variability analysis 1.10E-01RDL7.58E-013x RDL2.27E+0099.0% UPL1.10E-01Existing Source Level of Control2.30E+00ppmvd @ 3% O2* Cannot perform Skewness or Kurtosis test.
 !" ""#$%&! $' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" ) !
 !"+%%#' '! ( $$%$%)""$#" )*!"
 !" $$%$%)""$#" )(,!"($%)"!%)#%- .THC Variability Analysis - PVC Combined (Existing)ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2ppmvd @ 3% O2Units



# 101

# ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

	

	
	
	
		 
	

Major Source Requirements (Existing PVC Combined MA CT Floor)	
 
  	
  	
 
   !" 	
 #
$ 

Total

Reductions

Outlet Max Flow

Rate (DSCMM) Average O2 (%) Avg.

Temp (C) Vinyl Chloride (ppmvd @ 3%O2) HCl

(ppmvd @ 3%O2) CDD/CDF

(ng/dscm @ 3%O2) TotalHAP

(ppmvd @ 3%O2) Inlet Max

Flow Rate (DSCMM) Average O2

(%) Avg. Temp

(C) Vinyl

Chloride (ppmvd @ 3%O2) CE Redux Effy Vinyl Chloride (lbs/hr) VC

% & '( )* HCl

% & '( )* CDD/CDF

% & '( )* TOHAP

% & '( )* VC

% & '!	 +* HCl

% & '!	 +* CDD/CDF

(TEQ)

% & '!	 +* TOHAP

% & '!	 +* VC - 

,
-.	

/.

	
0&&. HCl 1

,
-.	

/.

	
0&&. CDD/CDF 1

,
-.	

/.

	
0&&. TOHAP - 

,
-.	

/.	


0&&. VC HCl CDD/CDF TOHAP Tons/yr

" 	
 
23 4
523 
23 
#21 
21 4
23 
23 
423 
$#23 
#234 
23 
623 6
6421  21# 
23 
5#21 $
421# 4
623 
23 
23 
23 
23 
23


23 7'*

	8"	(&&&.&

2 .&.(7
.&8.		8!"'!"+*
..	9,.
.
 &:.8	9; 2 ;	..&	 .&.

Average of All Facilities2 .&.(7
.&,
.&	28878	8	"8&.& 7&. 	
..	..&	

% 	.	':.	9,.
..	9,.*	8"	(&&&.& Facility Classification Outlet Conditions Inlet Conditions Reductions (Tons/yr) Baseline Emissions Estimates ".,
.&	 <.	/.		



# 102

# ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

	



		

		
	
 
		

		
 	
!"#$	$

 %&
	$'	$()((*+

,

 -. 		/	
 $'	$()((*
 
 
		+

 

 ! !"#"" $ %!#""

&'())* (+012304 +	,- *+052300 +	. 1+10230(

/0
1
"# #
 +' $ 
	.
6478/29.%$	/ 29.:%!	/(84*)5;<"$	
=	 *+0>2308 ;+4;2<0> (+;>2<0; 5+>42<0;(84*)5;<"$	
=<<? *+812308 ;+552<(0 8+012<0> ;+)(2<0>(84*5;><"$	
=	 4+(;2308 8+082<0> 4+1*2<0> (+*>2<0;(84*5;<"?$	
=	 4+512308 4+852<0> )+5*2<0> 8+;42<0;(84*5;<"?$	
=<<? 4+>(2308 8+;12<(0 )+(42<(0 8+1;2<0>(84)5;<"?$	
=	 4+512308 8+402<0> *+5*2<0> (+>>2<0;(84)5;<"?$	
=<<? 4+>(2308 8+(52<(0 *+))2<(0 (+>)2<0>(845;><"?$	
=	 4+512308 5+402<(0 (+1(2<0> )+482<0>(845;><"?$	
=<<? 4+>(2308 8+852<(0 *+;>2<(0 8+012<0>(845;<
$	
=	 4+*02308 (+*)2<0> 8+542<0> (+(12<0;(845;<
$	
=<<? 4+1)2308 (+502<(0 4+482<(0 (+*02<0>844@**@11@<"$	$
!.,(;>/ 4+>12308 (+0;2<0> 8+4)2<0> >+;>2<0>844@**@1<"?$	$
!.,(1)/ 4+)(2308 (+>;2<0> 4+>42<0> (+)12<0;844@**@1@<"?$	$
!.,(15/ 4+)(2308 8+812<0> *+*)2<0> (+;52<0;844@**@<
$	$
!.,(01/ 4+8)2308 8+;(2<0> 1+0*2<0> 8+(82<0;84@**@11@<"?$	$
!.,()5/ 4+)(2308 8+0)2<0> *+(02<0> (+582<0;84**@1<
$	$
!.,((*/ 4+8)2308 4+(12<0> 1+))2<0> 8+4;2<0;84@**@1<
$	$
!.,((;/ 4+8)2308 (+0)2<0; (+>(2<0; ;+042<0;84*)5;<"?$	
=	 4+512308 (+412<0> 8+5>2<0> (+(52<0;84*5;<
$	
=	 4+*02308 (+;82<0> 4+*(2<0> (+*42<0;845;<:	$	
=	 4+0)2308 1+8>2<(0 ;+>02<(0 4+5*2<0>845;<:	$	
=<<? 4+882308 (+>82<(0 4+*02<(0 (+*42<0> 8<'$!
$$
 (+*82308 (+0)2<01 ;+4(2<0) 4+*>2<0144@**@11@<"?$	$
!.,()>/ 4+)(2308 8+4)2<0> *+)>2<0> (+>52<0;44@**@1<
$	$
!.,(8)/ 4+8)2308 4+*(2<0> )+(82<0> 8+152<0;44@**@<:	$	$
!.,55/ 8+>82308 1+(*2<0> ;+812<0> 4+*52<0; #$! *+*(230( 4+412300 ;+(82<0( 4+*(2300,
=AB!	
 8+182308 ;+*02<05 (+(52<0) *+>02<0),
=A $B	!
 8+5)2308 5+)52<05 (+(52<0) *+>02<0)2$!$	 )+*1230( )+*82<0* 8+8;2<0* >+1)2<0*2$!
$	 >+>0230( 1+5)2<08 4+(*2<08 (+482<0(

&	
$
 8+082308 (+012<0) (+(52<0) *+>02<0)&	$! 4+00230( 8+;>2<0( *+552<08 8+002<0(

'$
4+80230( 8+;>2<0( 1+0>2<08 8+(*2<0('$!$	 1+01230( (+(82<08 4+((2<04 (+4(2<08'$!
$	 ;+*>230( 1+542<04 8+);2<04 (+(82<08 $$
 (+8;2308 8+4>2<01 (+)>2<01 5+0;2<01

$	
=	 *+**2308 5+>42<0> (+>*2<0; ;+(42<0;$	
=<<? *+)02308 8+5(2<0> )+;12<0> 8+;;2<0; 	!
 8+182308 ;+*02<05 (+(52<0) *+>02<0)

$

$	
 (+5;2308 (+0*2<01 (+082<01 *+852<01

$
>+*(230( 8+;>2<0( (+*>2<0( )+8;2<0( !	
 8+082308 (+012<0) (+(52<0) *+>02<0)

:
 >+8(230( )+502<0* 4+*02<0* (+*42<04
!$	 )+81230( 5+4(2<0* 8+1(2<0* (+0)2<04






# 103ATTACHMENT C - PVC Combined PROCESS VENTS ANALYSIS02/09/2012Process Vents Emission Testing CostsParameters/CostsEquation Values Testing Freq.* Annual Cost of Test Annual Cost of Initial Test TAC of TestingA. Parameters1. CE Plant Cost indexa. 2010 (Feb 10 Final CE Index)539.1b. 2009 (Annual CE Index)521.9c. 1992 (Annual CE Index)358.2B. Testing Costs, $1. Method 1 or 1A Included as part of M 23 -$2. Method 26 (HCl) = $5,000 x (539.1/358.2)3. Method 23 (CDD/CDF) = $21,000 x (539.1/358.2) - $5,000 $27,0004. Method 25A (THC) =$6,000x(539.1/521.9) $6,198		5. Method 18 (Assumed cost equal to 0031)$10,000C.CRF (20 yr, 7%): (0.07*(1+0.07)^20)/((1+0.07)^20-1)0.09439D. Facility Totals1.TOH, &VC3,240$2. CDD/CDF5,400$3. Facility Total$ 43,197.748,640$* Number of Years Between TestsNote:3. E-mail from Jason Dewees, EPA, to Mary Johnson,EPA. August 20, 2008. Re: Monitoring Options forSNCR & Test Cost Questions.4. Conversation with Ray Merrill, ERG - 11/5/2010.5. Email from Peter Westlin, EPA 4/8/2011 to ERG: Method 18 Costs1. Initial testing costs to be annualized over 20 years at 7% interest.2. Testing costs have been rounded to the nearest$1,000 to be consistent with level of rounding inoriginal costs; costs also adjusted based on additional information fromEPA.Sources:1. Memorandum from R. Segall, EPA/EMB, to R. Copland, EPA/SDB. October 14, 1992. Medical Waste Incinerator Study: Emission Measurement and ContinuousMonitoring.(II-B-89)2. E-mail from Jason Dewees, EPA, to Peter Westlin, EPA. August 20, 2008. Monitoring Options for SNCR & Test Cost Questions.



# 104

# Attachment D

GACT Analysis for Stripped Resins

105

# 	








# 

**
** 

5.51E+08 

## 

4.38E+06 

## 

# 
		
 !! 

 !
"#$#%&	#&#

Resin Type Pollutant Area Source Current

Level of Performance (Avg. Concentrations) Area Source Current

Level of Performance (With Variability) (ppmw) Option 1 Concentration

(Existing Source Requirements) (ppmw) Current Level of

Performance

Emissions (Tons/yr) Existing Source

Requirements Emissions (Tons/yr) Emissions

Reduction for Option 1 (Tons/yr)



##  '( '( '( () () (



# &# !
* "( '( '( +(+' +(+' (

 (," -"( -'( () ( (



# &# !
* ( -"( "'( -(-) ,)(") (

 +--(+ +( -( (' (,+ (



# &# !
* "'(" -( )( (+ (+- (

 +("" )( )( (- (- (



# &# !
* ")(" +( +( () ( (

 -"()) '( '( (' ('- (



# &# !
* ,('' ( ( (+ )(" (

 &.
/	*.&&.% !& .0&1#!&1..#&% !& .0 % .2&1..3 .2!.45.6&!7( !8 %.2&1..3  .!.45.6&!7( &1.%#&.7 .5.#&% !& .0 %.( &#*	$( (-)9 *

&#*: (-9 *

&#** (),9 *

**
"##
$ $
%&	** 

Cost Component Bulk Suspension Dispersion Suspension B lending Copolymer



## '
" 

#  !& ;$.!&#$&# & (9 (9 (9 (9 (9!&#.!.&!7 (,9- (,9- (,9- (,9- (,9- 

# !&#.% 0<..$!7#!0.$ &!7 & (+9- (+9- (+9- (+9- (+9-

**
"'
" 
()( 
()( 
()( 
()( 
() (** 

**
"** 

# !!#=.0#$&# & (9 (9 (9 (9 (9 

# !!# !& ;$.!& & (9 (9 (9 (9 (9

# !!#=.0
!&#.&!7#!0 !& !7 & (9 (9 (9 (9 (9

# !!#.&!7#!0 !& !7 & '(9- '(9- '(9- '(9- '(9- 

# !!#.% 0<..$!7#!0.$ &!7 & -()9- -()9- -()9- -()9- -()9-

**
"
" *+
 *+
 *+
 *+
 *+**

!&#.&!7 &.&1#!#!!#>&1..3 .2! # &=#& ! 3! &#&.&!7% & $.! !:.!0!7

 $ . .&#!..0.!* 0%& !

/	*.!* 0%& ! 



##  0..!* 0%& !


:8

/	*
$.! !

$. !



# 106

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

Resin Type Suspension Percentile: 9.99E+01 GACT Limit (ppmw) 3.52E+01 New Average of Vinyl Chloride Concentration (ppmw)

Facility Date Total Vinyl Chloride (ppmw)

# 	
	
	
    
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !   !  !  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !    !  !   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  ! !  ! !  
 
   
 
   !  !



# 107

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 ! !   
  
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
    
  
  ! !  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
    ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
  
   
  
    
  
  
 
  ! !  ! !   !  !  ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
    
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
     !  !  



# 108

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

          
 
  
 
      
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !   ! !  ! !  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  ! !  
 
  ! !   ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
   
  
  ! !  ! !   
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
  
   
  
  ! !  
 
  
 
    
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
  




# 109

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
   ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
   
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
   !  !  
 
  
 
   
  
   
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
    
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  




# 110

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
   
  
  
 
   
  
   
  
   
 
   
  
  
 
        
 
     
  
  
 
   
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
                       
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
   
  
   
  
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  




# 111

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !   
  
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !   ! !   !  !  ! !  ! !  ! !   !  !  ! !  ! !   !  !  ! !   ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
         
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 




# 112

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !               
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
    !  !   !  !  ! !  ! !  
 
   !  !  
 
  



# 113

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

        
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !   
 
                           
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !   !  !   !  !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  ! !



# 114

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
    
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
  
   
  
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
  
  ! !  
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
   
  
   
  
   
  
    !  !   
  
   
  
  
 
  ! !   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
   ! !  ! !   
  
   
  
  
 
   !  !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   ! !  ! !   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 




# 115

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

  
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  ! !  
 
   
  
  
 
   
 
  ! !  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
    
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
                 
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !   !  !  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 




# 116

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !   !  !  ! !   ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
  
  
 
  ! !   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
      
 
  
 
               ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
  




# 117

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
  
  
 
  ! !                   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
       
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
   
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  ! !    ! !   !  !  
 
  ! !  
 
   
  
  
 
   ! !          
 




# 118

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 ! !   
  
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   !  !  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !   ! !  
 
   
  
  
 
  ! !   
  
  
 
   
  
   ! !  
 
   !  !   
  
  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
  ! !   
 
   !  !  ! !  
 
  
 
                       
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !   ! !  
 




# 119

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

           
 
  ! !  ! !   ! !  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
   !  !  ! !   ! !  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
                 



# 120

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

   
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
    
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
  
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  ! !   !  !   
 
  ! !  
 
        
 
   
  
   !  !  ! !   ! !  ! !  ! !   
  
  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !



# 121

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  
 
  ! !  
 
   ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
  
   
  
    
 
  
 
     
  
  
 
  
 
   ! !  
 
  
 
   !  !  
 
  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !   
  
  
 
  ! !  
 
   
  
   
 
  
 
  
 
  



# 122

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

                                
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !   
  
  
 
   
 
  ! !  ! !  
 
  ! !  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
   !  !    !  !  ! !                                 



# 123

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

  
  
  
 
   
  
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
   
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
  ! !  
 
   
  
    !  !  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
   
  
  ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !   
 
  
 
   
  




# 124

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
  ! !  ! !   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
  
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !              
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 




# 125

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  ! !   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
    
  
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 




# 126

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

  
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
   !  !  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
  ! !  ! !  ! !   !  !  ! !  ! !   ! !   !  !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !   ! !  ! !  ! !  ! !   !  !  ! !  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 




# 127

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  ! !   
  
   
  
  
 
  ! !  ! !   ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  ! !   
  
  ! !   !  !  ! !   ! !   
  
  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
   !  !    
 
  ! !   
 
  
 
   
  
  ! !  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 




# 128

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - VC

 
 
  
 
   
 
  ! !  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
   
  
   
 
  ! !  ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
      ! !  
 
   ! !  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
             
 
  



# 129

# 	






Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

 ! "! #$%&% ' 

()*+,-,).)!!).&!!. */ 0

!)+#/* *.!/	* 	$%&% ' &&1). /!* 2*/  2! 3 /),). ".  //)   /

2/)  /

2/) 4).*/   )5" */  //) /" 6 /

/) 7 /$8

.)' 98 	#   :; :;

 :<
 =:
 <:
 1:>
 >:
 :1<
 <: 
 :<
 :=<
 1:1<; :>
 :1<
 1:=  :><
 :
*/ :<
 :; =:
 <:
 1:>
 >:
 :1<
 <:
 :<
 :=<
 1:1<; : 
 :1<
 1:=
 :><
 :
   :==; <:


 :<
 =:<
 1:
 1:<<
 >:1<
 :1
 1: <
 :
 :
 =:><; :1
 1:
 :<<  :><
*/ :<
 :==; =:<
 1:
 1:<<
 >:1<
 :1
 1:<
 :
 :
 =:><; <: 
 :1
 1:
 :<<
 :><
 =  >:>>
 >:=<
 :<;

 :
 :<
 <:<
 1:<
 >:<
 :<
 <: 
 :
 :
 =:<; :
 :<
 1:1<  :=
 >:
=*/ :
 >:>>
 :<
 <:<
 1:<
  >:<
 :<
 <:
 :
 1:=
 =:<; :> <
 :<
 1:1<
 :=
 >:
 1  :>
 <:>; <:=1
 :
 :=<


 :
 :>
 1:<
 1:<<
 >:=<
 :1
 1: 
 :
 :><
 =:=; :<
 :=<
 1:<  :1<
 :<
1*/ :
 :>
 =:; 1:<
 1:<<
 >:=<
 =:=>
 >:<
 <:
 :><
 =:=; :< 
 :=<
 1:<
 :1<
 :<
 <  :
 <:; :>
 :>; :>
 :< 
 1:1<
 :>=


 :<
 :>
 1:<
 1:<
 >:<
 :1
 1: 
 :
 =:<; :
 :<
 =:<
 :  :=<
<*/ :<
 :
 :1; 1:<
 <:=
 >:<
 :<
 :
 :=
 1:1<
 =:<; =: 
 :<
 =:<
 :
 :=<
   <:1>
 1:; :<
 :1
 :
 1:<
 1:


 :
 :>
 1:>
 1:1
 >:
 :<
 <: 
 :
 =:<; :
 :=
 1:<
 :  :<<
*/ :
 <:1>
 :; 1:>
 1:1
 >:
 :1
 >:
 <:=
 1:<
 =:<; := 
 :=
 1:<
 :
 :<<
 >  :1
 <:; :<=
 <:=
 <:<
 =:<


 :
 :
 1:>
 1:1
 >:<
 :1
 <: 
 :
 =:<; :
 :=
 1:
 :<  :<
>*/ :
 :1
 :; 1:>
 1:1
 >:<
 :1>
 <:
 =:=
 =:<
 =:<; : 
 :=
 1:
 :<
 :<
   :>
 1:=; =:
 :=
 :
 =:>
 >:


 :
 :
 1:><
 1:1<
 >:<
 :<
 <: 
 :
 :
 =:<; :=
 :=
 1:  :<
 :<<
*/ :
 :>
 :1; 1:><
 1:1<
 >:<
 :><
 :<
 <:
 :1
 =:<; 1:1
 :=
 1:
 :<
 :<<
   :<
 1:; =:1
 :<
 =:<1
 =:
 :>;  :1
 :
 1:1
 1:
 :<
 :=
 1:
 :
 =:<; :
 :
 =:><
 :<
 :
*/ :1
 :<
 :1; 1:1
 1:
 :<
 :=
 <:>=
 :>
 =:
 =:<; <:> 
 :
 =:><
 :<
 :
   =:>; =:>
 :


 :
 :=
 :1
 1:1<
 1:<
 :>
 : =
 1:1<
 :
 :<<
 :<; :<
 =:><  :
 :
*/ :
 :=
 :; 1:1<
 1:<
  :>
 :1
 1:1<
 :
 :<<
 :<; : 
 :<
 =:><
 :
 :
   :=; :1
 <:=
 :>
 =:; :; :;

 :<
 :
 :<
 :1
 :>
 :>
 : 1
 1:
 :
 :
 =:; <:<
 1:  :
 :<
*/ :<
 :
 =:; :1
 :>
  :>
 =:
 :
 :
 :
 =:; =: ; <:<
 <:
 :
 <:=
   :1; <:=; :1
 :<1
 :;

 :
 :>
 1:=
 1:
 :<<
 :<
 1: =
 :>
 :<
 =:; :<
 =:>
 :1  <:<
*/ :
 :1; :<; 1:=
 1:
 :<<
 :<
 :>
 :
 :<
 =:; : ; :<
 =:>
 :1
 <:<
 =  1:=1
 <:; :
 :


 :
 :1
 1:<
 =:<
 :1<
 :<
 1: =
 :>
 :<<
 :; :<
 =:<
 :  <:<
=*/ :
 1:=1
 :=; 1:<
 =:<
  :1<
 :<
 :>
 :>
 :<<
 :; : 
 :<
 =:<
 :
 <:<
 1  =:>
 1:<; :=;

 :
 :1
 1:<
 1:=<
 >:<
 :=<
 1: >
 :
 :<<
 :; :>
 :<
 =:<  :<
 :1
1*/ :
 =:>
 :=; 1:<
 1:=<
  >:<
 :=<
 1:>
 :
 :<<
 :; >: 1
 :<
 =:<
 :<
 :1
 <  =:
 <:<; 1:
 :>=
 =:
 :;

 :<
 :<
 1:<
 1:=<
 >:<
 :1
 <: 
 :
 :>
 =:; :<
 =:<
 :<  :1
<*/ :<
 =:
 :; 1:<
 1:=<
  >:<
 :>
 :
 :<
 :>
 =:; : ; :<
 =:<
 :<
 :1
   =:
 :>; :>1
 :=
 1:
 :>; <:


 :><
 :<
 :
 :
 :
 :1
 : >
 :
 :
 =:; :
 :
 : */ :><
 =:
 <:1; :
 :
  :
 :=>
 :<
 =:
 :
 =:; :> ; <:
 :
 :
 :
 >  <:<
 :1; 1:
 :1=
 :>
 :<1;

 :
 :<
 :><
 :><
 :><
 :<
 =: 
 :
 :
 :<; :=
 :><
 :<  :><
>*/ :
 <:<
 >:=; :><
 :><
  :><
 =:=
 :<
 :
 :
 :<; :< 1; :=
 :><
 :<
 :><
   :<
 :>; :>
 :<>
 :>; :


 :<
 :>
 :<
 :<
 :<
 :1
 : 
 :
 :<
 =:; :
 :
 :<  :<
*/ :<
 :<
 <:; :<
 :<
  :<
 :
 :
 :
 :<
 =:; :> ; :
 :
 :<
 :<
   <:
 :; =:
 :
 :1
 > :=
 :;

 :<
 :<
 :<
 :
 :; :
 :<
 :<
 :<
*/ :<
 <:
 :; :<
 =:
  :<
 :
 :1
 >:=
 :
 :; : ; :
 :<
 :<
 :<
 >  :=; :=
 :>=; <:;

 :
 >:>
 :><
 :
 :
 :
 : 
 :
 :
 =:=<; :<
 :
 :  :
 :
>*/ :
 :<; :><
 :
 :
  :
 :=
 :
 :
 :>=; =:=<; :<<;  :
 :
 :
 :
   :>
 >:=
 1:<
 :<
= :1
 :; :1
 1:>
=

 :
 :
 :
 :
 :
 :
 : 
 =:1<; :
 :
 :
 :
 : */ :
 >:=
 :
 :
 :
 :
 1:<
 :
 :<
 :1
 =:1<; :=< 
 <:
 :
 :
 :
   :=>
 :<; <:>
 :
 =:
 : ; :1


 >:
 :
 :
 :
 :>
 =:; :1 
 :
 :
*/ :=>
 >:
 :<; :
 :
 <:>
 :
 :
 =:
 :>
 =:; : ; :1
 :
 :
 :1
 >  :=
 :<
 :; >:=
 =:
 : =
 :
 :=


 :>
 :>
 :>
 =:; :>
 :
 :> 
 :>
>*/ :=
 :<
 :; :>
 :>
 >:=
 =:
 :>
 :=
 :
 =:; :> 
 :
 :>
 :>
 :=
   :1=
 :; :1>; :
 :>
 : 
 :11;

 :
 :
 :
 =:; :>
 :
 : 
 :
 :
*/ :1=
 :; :1>; :
 :
  :
 :>
 :
 :
 :11; =:; :>  :
 :
 :
 :
 =  >:
 :; :<
 >:
= :=1;

 :>
 :>
 :>
 :>
 :>
 =:=; : 
 :>
 :>
 :>
 :>
=*/ :>
 >:
 :; :>
 :>
 :<
 :>
 :>
 >:
= :=1; =:=; :  :>
 :>
 :>
 :>
 =  :1
 >:1
 :>=; <:<
 :
 : 
 :<1; :; =:
 =:


 =:
 =:
 =:
 =:; =:
 =:
=*/ :1
 >:1
 :>=; =:
 =:
 <:<
 :
 =:
 :
 :<1; =:; : ; =:
 =:
 =:
 =:
   :<
 :<; :; 1:>
 :
 :1 
 :1; :=;

 :>
 :>
 :>
 :; :>
 :>
 :> 
 :>
*/ :<
 :<; :; :>
 :>
 1: >
 :
 :>
 :1
 :1; :; :=; :>
 :>
 :>
 :>




# 130

# 	






Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - Total Resins - Suspension - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

Detection Limit Analysis

Facility HAP Sum Daily HAP Sum ln Total HAP

98 	# 1:<; Normal Lognormal 98 	# <:; n 2.70E+01 2.70E+01 98 	# :1; :1; :1; m 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 98 	# :; Average 1.21E+01 2.38E+00 98 	# 1:; Median 8.98E+00 2.19E+00 98 	# >:; >:; :>; Standard Deviation 6.25E+00 4.65E-01 98 	# :>; Minimum 6.26E+00 1.83E+00 98 	# 1:1; Maximum 2.48E+01 3.21E+00 98 	# :1; :1; :>; Skewness 1.01E+00 6.97E-01 98 	# :>; SE Skewness 4.71E-01 4.71E-01 98 	# 1:<<; Skewness Test Non-normal Normal 98 	# >:<; >:<; :; Kurtosis -5.92E-01 -1.06E+00 98 	# :<; SE Kurtosis 9.43E-01 9.43E-01 98 	# 1:; Kurtosis Test Normal Normal 98 	# :; :; :; t-statistic for UPL 2.48E+00 2.48E+00 98 	# <:; UPL 2.79E+01 3.50E+01 98 	# 1:1; 98 	# >:>; >:>; :; Average for variability analysis 1.21E+01 98 	# <:; RDL 4.75E+00 98 	# 1:; 3 x RDL 1.43E+01 98 	# >:; >:; :; UPL 3.50E+01 ppmw 98 	# :>; MACT Floor 3.50E+01 ppmw 98 	# 1:1; 98 	# >:<; >:<; :; 1) if the 3x RDL value is less than or equal to the calculated floor or emissions limit, use the calcu lated floor or emissions limit value for the rule m aking. 98 	# :=; 2) if the 3x RDL value is greater than the calculat ed floor or emissions limit, use the 3x RDL value a s the floor or emissions limit adjusted for measure ment variability for the rule making 98 	# 1:<; 98 	# >:=; >:=; :; 98 	# 1:1; 98 	# =:; 98 	# :; :; :; 98 	# :; 98 	# 1:>; 98 	# :=; :=; :<; 98 	# >:>; 98 	# 1:>; 98 	# :; :; :; 98 	# :; 98 	# =:; 98 	# >:; >:; :>; 98 	# :<; 98 	# 1:>; 98 	# >:; >:; :; 98 	# >:>>; 98 	# 1:=; 98 	# :>; :>; :>; 98 	# :=; 98 	# =:; 98 	# :; :; :1; 98 	# :; 98 	# =:; 98 	# :=; :=; :<>; 98 	# :1; 98 	# 1:; 98 	# :; :; :1; 98 	# :<; 98 	# =:=; 98 	# :; :; :<; 98 	# :>; 98 	# 1:; 98 	# :1; :1; :; 98 	# :; 98 	# 1:; 98 	# :; :; :=; 98 	# :; 98 	# =:1; 98 	# :=; :=; =:; 98 	# :; 98 	# =:==; 98 	# :=; :=; =:; 98 	# :><; 98 	# =:<<; 98 	# :; :; =:<; 98 	# :; 98 	# =:>; 98 	# :1; :1; =:; 98 	# :; 98 	# =:; 98 	# :1; :1; =:; 98 	# :; 98 	# :>; 98 	# :; :; =:=;



# 131

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

GACT Worst Performer Determination GACT Limit Calculation

Resin Type Dispersion Resin Type Dispersion Percentile: 9.99E+01 GACT Limit (ppmw) 1.43E+03 New Data Average of Vinyl Chloride Concentration (ppmw)

Facility Sum of NR Count of Vinyl Chloride Concentration (ppmw) Sum of BDL Average of Vinyl Chloride Concentration (ppmw) Rank Facility

Date Total Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) PolyOne - Pedricktown 3.50E+02 1.46E+03 0.00E+00 1.44E+02 1 Formosa - Delaware City 1/1/2007 #DIV/0! PolyOne - Henry 2.17E+02 1.46E+03 0.00E+00 3.81E+02 2 1/2/2007 #DIV/0! Formosa - Delaware City 2.57E+02 1.46E+03 0.00E+00 5.34E+02 3 1/3/2007 6.70E+02 6.70E+02 Grand Total 8.24E+02 4.38E+03 0.00E+00 3.59E+02 1/4/2007 6.31E+02 6.31E+02 1/5/2007 4.87E+02 4.87E+02 1/6/2007 5.16E+02 5.16E+02 1/7/2007 6.90E+02 6.90E+02 1/8/2007 5.50E+02 5.50E+02 1/9/2007 5.69E+02 5.69E+02 1/10/2007 5.88E+02 5.88E+02 1/11/2007 4.91E+02 4.91E+02 1/12/2007 8.01E+02 8.01E+02 1/13/2007 #DIV/0! 1/14/2007 #DIV/0! 1/15/2007 #DIV/0! 1/16/2007 #DIV/0! 1/17/2007 #DIV/0! 1/18/2007 #DIV/0! 1/19/2007 #DIV/0! 1/20/2007 #DIV/0! 1/21/2007 #DIV/0! 1/22/2007 #DIV/0! 1/23/2007 #DIV/0! 1/24/2007 #DIV/0! 1/25/2007 #DIV/0! 1/26/2007 #DIV/0! 1/27/2007 #DIV/0! 1/28/2007 #DIV/0! 1/29/2007 #DIV/0! 1/30/2007 #DIV/0! 1/31/2007 #DIV/0! 2/1/2007 #DIV/0! 2/2/2007 #DIV/0! 2/3/2007 #DIV/0! 2/4/2007 5.58E+02 5.58E+02 2/5/2007 4.18E+02 4.18E+02 2/6/2007 3.93E+02 3.93E+02 2/7/2007 4.01E+02 4.01E+02 2/8/2007 3.94E+02 3.94E+02 2/9/2007 4.42E+02 4.42E+02 2/10/2007 4.03E+02 4.03E+02 2/11/2007 4.89E+02 4.89E+02 2/12/2007 4.54E+02 4.54E+02 2/13/2007 4.51E+02 4.51E+02 2/14/2007 4.20E+02 4.20E+02 2/15/2007 5.34E+02 5.34E+02 2/16/2007 5.20E+02 5.20E+02 2/17/2007 6.15E+02 6.15E+02 2/18/2007 6.73E+02 6.73E+02 2/19/2007 7.46E+02 7.46E+02 2/20/2007 7.93E+02 7.93E+02 2/21/2007 9.31E+02 9.31E+02 2/22/2007 5.16E+02 5.16E+02 2/23/2007 5.80E+02 5.80E+02 2/24/2007 5.89E+02 5.89E+02 2/25/2007 5.68E+02 5.68E+02 2/26/2007 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 2/27/2007 5.73E+02 5.73E+02 2/28/2007 5.24E+02 5.24E+02 3/1/2007 4.91E+02 4.91E+02 3/2/2007 2.84E+02 2.84E+02 3/3/2007 5.34E+02 5.34E+02 3/4/2007 6.87E+02 6.87E+02 3/5/2007 4.75E+02 4.75E+02 3/6/2007 5.85E+02 5.85E+02 3/7/2007 5.58E+02 5.58E+02 3/8/2007 6.97E+02 6.97E+02 3/9/2007 6.52E+02 6.52E+02 3/10/2007 5.22E+02 5.22E+02 3/11/2007 6.19E+02 6.19E+02 3/12/2007 6.60E+02 6.60E+02 3/13/2007 5.87E+02 5.87E+02 3/14/2007 5.60E+02 5.60E+02 3/15/2007 #DIV/0! 3/16/2007 #DIV/0! 3/17/2007 #DIV/0! 3/18/2007 #DIV/0! 3/19/2007 #DIV/0! 3/20/2007 #DIV/0! 3/21/2007 #DIV/0! 3/22/2007 #DIV/0! 3/23/2007 #DIV/0! 3/24/2007 #DIV/0! 3/25/2007 #DIV/0! 3/26/2007 #DIV/0! 3/27/2007 #DIV/0! 3/28/2007 #DIV/0! 3/29/2007 #DIV/0! 3/30/2007 #DIV/0! 3/31/2007 #DIV/0! 4/1/2007 #DIV/0! 4/2/2007 2.73E+02 2.73E+02 4/3/2007 2.32E+02 2.32E+02 4/4/2007 3.45E+02 3.45E+02 4/5/2007 3.26E+02 3.26E+02 4/6/2007 4.40E+02 4.40E+02 4/7/2007 3.37E+02 3.37E+02 4/8/2007 3.07E+02 3.07E+02 4/9/2007 3.56E+02 3.56E+02 4/10/2007 3.85E+02 3.85E+02 4/11/2007 3.28E+02 3.28E+02 4/12/2007 4.34E+02 4.34E+02 4/13/2007 3.28E+02 3.28E+02 4/14/2007 4.44E+02 4.44E+02 4/15/2007 3.82E+02 3.82E+02 4/16/2007 3.16E+02 3.16E+02 4/17/2007 4.93E+02 4.93E+02 4/18/2007 4.04E+02 4.04E+02 4/19/2007 3.41E+02 3.41E+02 4/20/2007 4.94E+02 4.94E+02 4/21/2007 4.49E+02 4.49E+02 4/22/2007 5.60E+02 5.60E+02 4/23/2007 4.25E+02 4.25E+02 4/24/2007 6.95E+02 6.95E+02 4/25/2007 4.83E+02 4.83E+02 4/26/2007 4.40E+02 4.40E+02 4/27/2007 3.50E+02 3.50E+02 4/28/2007 3.73E+02 3.73E+02



# 132

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

4/29/2007 4.43E+02 4.43E+02 4/30/2007 2.84E+02 2.84E+02 5/1/2007 3.21E+02 3.21E+02 5/2/2007 3.86E+02 3.86E+02 5/3/2007 4.19E+02 4.19E+02 5/4/2007 4.00E+02 4.00E+02 5/5/2007 3.98E+02 3.98E+02 5/6/2007 3.89E+02 3.89E+02 5/7/2007 4.18E+02 4.18E+02 5/8/2007 3.96E+02 3.96E+02 5/9/2007 4.38E+02 4.38E+02 5/10/2007 3.98E+02 3.98E+02 5/11/2007 3.84E+02 3.84E+02 5/12/2007 3.79E+02 3.79E+02 5/13/2007 4.30E+02 4.30E+02 5/14/2007 4.30E+02 4.30E+02 5/15/2007 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 5/16/2007 3.47E+02 3.47E+02 5/17/2007 3.26E+02 3.26E+02 5/18/2007 3.59E+02 3.59E+02 5/19/2007 3.81E+02 3.81E+02 5/20/2007 3.35E+02 3.35E+02 5/21/2007 4.79E+02 4.79E+02 5/22/2007 6.87E+02 6.87E+02 5/23/2007 3.41E+02 3.41E+02 5/24/2007 2.93E+02 2.93E+02 5/25/2007 2.10E+02 2.10E+02 5/26/2007 2.72E+02 2.72E+02 5/27/2007 2.87E+02 2.87E+02 5/28/2007 2.50E+02 2.50E+02 5/29/2007 #DIV/0! 5/30/2007 #DIV/0! 5/31/2007 #DIV/0! 6/1/2007 #DIV/0! 6/2/2007 #DIV/0! 6/3/2007 #DIV/0! 6/4/2007 #DIV/0! 6/5/2007 #DIV/0! 6/6/2007 #DIV/0! 6/7/2007 #DIV/0! 6/8/2007 #DIV/0! 6/9/2007 #DIV/0! 6/10/2007 #DIV/0! 6/11/2007 #DIV/0! 6/12/2007 #DIV/0! 6/13/2007 #DIV/0! 6/14/2007 #DIV/0! 6/15/2007 #DIV/0! 6/16/2007 #DIV/0! 6/17/2007 #DIV/0! 6/18/2007 #DIV/0! 6/19/2007 3.39E+02 3.39E+02 6/20/2007 3.48E+02 3.48E+02 6/21/2007 3.66E+02 3.66E+02 6/22/2007 3.88E+02 3.88E+02 6/23/2007 3.97E+02 3.97E+02 6/24/2007 4.89E+02 4.89E+02 6/25/2007 4.99E+02 4.99E+02 6/26/2007 4.70E+02 4.70E+02 6/27/2007 5.18E+02 5.18E+02 6/28/2007 4.91E+02 4.91E+02 6/29/2007 5.91E+02 5.91E+02 6/30/2007 3.81E+02 3.81E+02 7/1/2007 3.60E+02 3.60E+02 7/2/2007 3.46E+02 3.46E+02 7/3/2007 2.92E+02 2.92E+02 7/4/2007 3.31E+02 3.31E+02 7/5/2007 4.16E+02 4.16E+02 7/6/2007 6.00E+02 6.00E+02 7/7/2007 6.41E+02 6.41E+02 7/8/2007 4.55E+02 4.55E+02 7/9/2007 5.80E+02 5.80E+02 7/10/2007 6.36E+02 6.36E+02 7/11/2007 5.91E+02 5.91E+02 7/12/2007 4.74E+02 4.74E+02 7/13/2007 5.31E+02 5.31E+02 7/14/2007 2.11E+02 2.11E+02 7/15/2007 3.83E+02 3.83E+02 7/16/2007 5.44E+02 5.44E+02 7/17/2007 5.79E+02 5.79E+02 7/18/2007 6.95E+02 6.95E+02 7/19/2007 6.66E+02 6.66E+02 7/20/2007 6.66E+02 6.66E+02 7/21/2007 5.77E+02 5.77E+02 7/22/2007 5.84E+02 5.84E+02 7/23/2007 6.44E+02 6.44E+02 7/24/2007 6.22E+02 6.22E+02 7/25/2007 5.08E+02 5.08E+02 7/26/2007 4.94E+02 4.94E+02 7/27/2007 5.65E+02 5.65E+02 7/28/2007 7.00E+02 7.00E+02 7/29/2007 6.56E+02 6.56E+02 7/30/2007 5.81E+02 5.81E+02 7/31/2007 5.35E+02 5.35E+02 8/1/2007 5.35E+02 5.35E+02 8/2/2007 3.71E+02 3.71E+02 8/3/2007 4.03E+02 4.03E+02 8/4/2007 5.86E+02 5.86E+02 8/5/2007 5.37E+02 5.37E+02 8/6/2007 4.29E+02 4.29E+02 8/7/2007 5.58E+02 5.58E+02 8/8/2007 6.74E+02 6.74E+02 8/9/2007 #DIV/0! 8/10/2007 4.79E+02 4.79E+02 8/11/2007 #DIV/0! 8/12/2007 #DIV/0! 8/13/2007 #DIV/0! 8/14/2007 #DIV/0! 8/15/2007 #DIV/0! 8/16/2007 #DIV/0! 8/17/2007 #DIV/0! 8/18/2007 #DIV/0! 8/19/2007 #DIV/0! 8/20/2007 #DIV/0! 8/21/2007 #DIV/0! 8/22/2007 #DIV/0! 8/23/2007 #DIV/0! 8/24/2007 #DIV/0! 8/25/2007 #DIV/0! 8/26/2007 #DIV/0! 8/27/2007 #DIV/0! 8/28/2007 #DIV/0! 8/29/2007 #DIV/0! 8/30/2007 4.61E+02 4.61E+02 8/31/2007 5.92E+02 5.92E+02 9/1/2007 5.46E+02 5.46E+02 9/2/2007 3.07E+02 3.07E+02 9/3/2007 3.52E+02 3.52E+02 9/4/2007 2.76E+02 2.76E+02 9/5/2007 4.95E+02 4.95E+02



# 133

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

9/6/2007 2.35E+02 2.35E+02 9/7/2007 3.35E+02 3.35E+02 9/8/2007 4.45E+02 4.45E+02 9/9/2007 4.89E+02 4.89E+02 9/10/2007 4.38E+02 4.38E+02 9/11/2007 3.77E+02 3.77E+02 9/12/2007 3.55E+02 3.55E+02 9/13/2007 4.06E+02 4.06E+02 9/14/2007 3.29E+02 3.29E+02 9/15/2007 3.76E+02 3.76E+02 9/16/2007 3.99E+02 3.99E+02 9/17/2007 3.44E+02 3.44E+02 9/18/2007 3.55E+02 3.55E+02 9/19/2007 2.76E+02 2.76E+02 9/20/2007 3.48E+02 3.48E+02 9/21/2007 3.34E+02 3.34E+02 9/22/2007 3.10E+02 3.10E+02 9/23/2007 3.33E+02 3.33E+02 9/24/2007 4.26E+02 4.26E+02 9/25/2007 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 9/26/2007 3.92E+02 3.92E+02 9/27/2007 3.88E+02 3.88E+02 9/28/2007 4.43E+02 4.43E+02 9/29/2007 4.37E+02 4.37E+02 9/30/2007 3.72E+02 3.72E+02 10/1/2007 4.28E+02 4.28E+02 10/2/2007 3.90E+02 3.90E+02 10/3/2007 4.61E+02 4.61E+02 10/4/2007 2.49E+02 2.49E+02 10/5/2007 #DIV/0! 10/6/2007 #DIV/0! 10/7/2007 #DIV/0! 10/8/2007 #DIV/0! 10/9/2007 #DIV/0! 10/10/2007 #DIV/0! 10/11/2007 #DIV/0! 10/12/2007 #DIV/0! 10/13/2007 #DIV/0! 10/14/2007 #DIV/0! 10/15/2007 #DIV/0! 10/16/2007 #DIV/0! 10/17/2007 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 10/18/2007 5.52E+02 5.52E+02 10/19/2007 4.17E+02 4.17E+02 10/20/2007 4.45E+02 4.45E+02 10/21/2007 3.87E+02 3.87E+02 10/22/2007 3.68E+02 3.68E+02 10/23/2007 4.55E+02 4.55E+02 10/24/2007 3.89E+02 3.89E+02 10/25/2007 3.84E+02 3.84E+02 10/26/2007 5.16E+02 5.16E+02 10/27/2007 7.79E+02 7.79E+02 10/28/2007 4.88E+02 4.88E+02 10/29/2007 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 10/30/2007 4.30E+02 4.30E+02 10/31/2007 #DIV/0! 11/1/2007 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 11/2/2007 8.29E+02 8.29E+02 11/3/2007 #DIV/0! 11/4/2007 1.62E+01 1.62E+01 11/5/2007 6.25E+02 6.25E+02 11/6/2007 5.94E+02 5.94E+02 11/7/2007 6.12E+02 6.12E+02 11/8/2007 6.65E+02 6.65E+02 11/9/2007 8.06E+02 8.06E+02 11/10/2007 #DIV/0! 11/11/2007 #DIV/0! 11/12/2007 4.06E+02 4.06E+02 11/13/2007 3.97E+02 3.97E+02 11/14/2007 3.22E+02 3.22E+02 11/15/2007 1.73E+02 1.73E+02 11/16/2007 3.28E+02 3.28E+02 11/17/2007 #DIV/0! 11/18/2007 6.22E+02 6.22E+02 11/19/2007 5.02E+02 5.02E+02 11/20/2007 3.55E+02 3.55E+02 11/21/2007 3.69E+02 3.69E+02 11/22/2007 2.88E+02 2.88E+02 11/23/2007 1.01E+03 1.01E+03 11/24/2007 #DIV/0! 11/25/2007 #DIV/0! 11/26/2007 #DIV/0! 11/27/2007 #DIV/0! 11/28/2007 6.06E+02 6.06E+02 11/29/2007 3.87E+02 3.87E+02 11/30/2007 4.12E+02 4.12E+02 12/1/2007 4.91E+02 4.91E+02 12/2/2007 4.54E+02 4.54E+02 12/3/2007 3.83E+02 3.83E+02 12/4/2007 4.26E+02 4.26E+02 12/5/2007 4.76E+02 4.76E+02 12/6/2007 4.00E+02 4.00E+02 12/7/2007 4.44E+02 4.44E+02 12/8/2007 4.50E+02 4.50E+02 12/9/2007 4.58E+02 4.58E+02 12/10/2007 6.77E+02 6.77E+02 12/11/2007 8.58E+02 8.58E+02 12/12/2007 5.19E+02 5.19E+02 12/13/2007 7.18E+02 7.18E+02 12/14/2007 6.08E+02 6.08E+02 12/15/2007 1.07E+03 1.07E+03 12/16/2007 8.73E+02 8.73E+02 12/17/2007 6.85E+02 6.85E+02 12/18/2007 7.17E+02 7.17E+02 12/19/2007 6.52E+02 6.52E+02 12/20/2007 7.20E+02 7.20E+02 12/21/2007 8.60E+02 8.60E+02 12/22/2007 7.56E+02 7.56E+02 12/23/2007 9.16E+02 9.16E+02 12/24/2007 6.57E+02 6.57E+02 12/25/2007 5.10E+02 5.10E+02 12/26/2007 5.44E+02 5.44E+02 12/27/2007 5.74E+02 5.74E+02 12/28/2007 6.30E+02 6.30E+02 12/29/2007 6.31E+02 6.31E+02 12/30/2007 5.76E+02 5.76E+02 12/31/2007 4.75E+02 4.75E+02 1/1/2008 4.66E+02 4.66E+02 1/2/2008 5.39E+02 5.39E+02 1/3/2008 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 1/4/2008 4.36E+02 4.36E+02 1/5/2008 #DIV/0! 1/6/2008 #DIV/0! 1/7/2008 2.67E+02 2.67E+02 1/8/2008 4.57E+02 4.57E+02 1/9/2008 3.17E+02 3.17E+02 1/10/2008 2.75E+02 2.75E+02 1/11/2008 3.67E+02 3.67E+02 1/12/2008 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 1/13/2008 #DIV/0!



# 134

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

1/14/2008 4.08E+02 4.08E+02 1/15/2008 3.64E+02 3.64E+02 1/16/2008 5.49E+02 5.49E+02 1/17/2008 4.66E+02 4.66E+02 1/18/2008 4.56E+02 4.56E+02 1/19/2008 #DIV/0! 1/20/2008 #DIV/0! 1/21/2008 6.23E+02 6.23E+02 1/22/2008 6.88E+02 6.88E+02 1/23/2008 5.64E+02 5.64E+02 1/24/2008 6.79E+02 6.79E+02 1/25/2008 7.29E+02 7.29E+02 1/26/2008 8.28E+02 8.28E+02 1/27/2008 6.69E+02 6.69E+02 1/28/2008 5.02E+02 5.02E+02 1/29/2008 6.17E+02 6.17E+02 1/30/2008 5.88E+02 5.88E+02 1/31/2008 6.10E+02 6.10E+02 2/1/2008 6.35E+02 6.35E+02 2/2/2008 5.92E+02 5.92E+02 2/3/2008 6.51E+02 6.51E+02 2/4/2008 6.16E+02 6.16E+02 2/5/2008 4.67E+02 4.67E+02 2/6/2008 3.28E+02 3.28E+02 2/7/2008 5.55E+02 5.55E+02 2/8/2008 5.20E+02 5.20E+02 2/9/2008 6.24E+02 6.24E+02 2/10/2008 7.19E+02 7.19E+02 2/11/2008 5.05E+02 5.05E+02 2/12/2008 4.84E+02 4.84E+02 2/13/2008 3.95E+02 3.95E+02 2/14/2008 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 2/15/2008 4.00E+02 4.00E+02 2/16/2008 #DIV/0! 2/17/2008 #DIV/0! 2/18/2008 4.56E+02 4.56E+02 2/19/2008 5.54E+02 5.54E+02 2/20/2008 6.66E+02 6.66E+02 2/21/2008 4.70E+02 4.70E+02 2/22/2008 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 2/23/2008 #DIV/0! 2/24/2008 #DIV/0! 2/25/2008 6.40E+02 6.40E+02 2/26/2008 4.12E+02 4.12E+02 2/27/2008 3.97E+02 3.97E+02 2/28/2008 5.43E+02 5.43E+02 2/29/2008 4.89E+02 4.89E+02 3/1/2008 3.92E+02 3.92E+02 3/2/2008 4.22E+02 4.22E+02 3/3/2008 2.82E+02 2.82E+02 3/4/2008 4.19E+02 4.19E+02 3/5/2008 6.21E+02 6.21E+02 3/6/2008 6.22E+02 6.22E+02 3/7/2008 6.31E+02 6.31E+02 3/8/2008 4.81E+02 4.81E+02 3/9/2008 5.19E+02 5.19E+02 3/10/2008 4.71E+02 4.71E+02 3/11/2008 5.14E+02 5.14E+02 3/12/2008 3.97E+02 3.97E+02 3/13/2008 5.17E+02 5.17E+02 3/14/2008 4.34E+02 4.34E+02 3/15/2008 4.71E+02 4.71E+02 3/16/2008 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 3/17/2008 5.28E+02 5.28E+02 3/18/2008 6.81E+02 6.81E+02 3/19/2008 7.02E+02 7.02E+02 3/20/2008 6.97E+02 6.97E+02 3/21/2008 7.60E+02 7.60E+02 3/22/2008 7.71E+02 7.71E+02 3/23/2008 8.87E+02 8.87E+02 3/24/2008 7.28E+02 7.28E+02 3/25/2008 7.37E+02 7.37E+02 3/26/2008 6.82E+02 6.82E+02 3/27/2008 #DIV/0! 3/28/2008 #DIV/0! 3/29/2008 9.96E+02 9.96E+02 3/30/2008 7.82E+02 7.82E+02 3/31/2008 3.62E+02 3.62E+02 4/1/2008 3.78E+02 3.78E+02 4/2/2008 4.37E+02 4.37E+02 4/3/2008 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 4/4/2008 4.27E+02 4.27E+02 4/5/2008 3.90E+02 3.90E+02 4/6/2008 4.46E+02 4.46E+02 4/7/2008 3.75E+02 3.75E+02 4/8/2008 5.03E+02 5.03E+02 4/9/2008 8.66E+02 8.66E+02 4/10/2008 9.46E+02 9.46E+02 4/11/2008 7.41E+02 7.41E+02 4/12/2008 6.15E+02 6.15E+02 4/13/2008 7.37E+02 7.37E+02 4/14/2008 5.94E+02 5.94E+02 4/15/2008 5.38E+02 5.38E+02 4/16/2008 6.52E+02 6.52E+02 4/17/2008 4.14E+02 4.14E+02 4/18/2008 3.60E+02 3.60E+02 4/19/2008 #DIV/0! 4/20/2008 #DIV/0! 4/21/2008 #DIV/0! 4/22/2008 #DIV/0! 4/23/2008 #DIV/0! 4/24/2008 #DIV/0! 4/25/2008 #DIV/0! 4/26/2008 #DIV/0! 4/27/2008 #DIV/0! 4/28/2008 #DIV/0! 4/29/2008 #DIV/0! 4/30/2008 7.73E+02 7.73E+02 5/1/2008 7.23E+02 7.23E+02 5/2/2008 6.92E+02 6.92E+02 5/3/2008 7.42E+02 7.42E+02 5/4/2008 7.68E+02 7.68E+02 5/5/2008 6.47E+02 6.47E+02 5/6/2008 4.05E+02 4.05E+02 5/7/2008 7.62E+02 7.62E+02 5/8/2008 7.30E+02 7.30E+02 5/9/2008 6.64E+02 6.64E+02 5/10/2008 7.71E+02 7.71E+02 5/11/2008 5.91E+02 5.91E+02 5/12/2008 5.07E+02 5.07E+02 5/13/2008 5.71E+02 5.71E+02 5/14/2008 5.09E+02 5.09E+02 5/15/2008 5.52E+02 5.52E+02 5/16/2008 5.59E+02 5.59E+02 5/17/2008 5.93E+02 5.93E+02 5/18/2008 3.06E+02 3.06E+02 5/19/2008 8.33E+02 8.33E+02 5/20/2008 4.01E+02 4.01E+02 5/21/2008 3.39E+02 3.39E+02 5/22/2008 3.68E+02 3.68E+02



# 135

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

5/23/2008 4.30E+02 4.30E+02 5/24/2008 #DIV/0! 5/25/2008 #DIV/0! 5/26/2008 3.75E+02 3.75E+02 5/27/2008 3.89E+02 3.89E+02 5/28/2008 3.50E+02 3.50E+02 5/29/2008 4.47E+02 4.47E+02 5/30/2008 3.96E+02 3.96E+02 5/31/2008 #DIV/0! 6/1/2008 #DIV/0! 6/2/2008 #DIV/0! 6/3/2008 #DIV/0! 6/4/2008 #DIV/0! 6/5/2008 1.82E+01 1.82E+01 6/6/2008 5.61E+02 5.61E+02 6/7/2008 5.06E+02 5.06E+02 6/8/2008 5.52E+02 5.52E+02 6/9/2008 8.11E+02 8.11E+02 6/10/2008 1.02E+03 1.02E+03 6/11/2008 1.09E+03 1.09E+03 6/12/2008 6.19E+02 6.19E+02 6/13/2008 7.52E+02 7.52E+02 6/14/2008 9.06E+02 9.06E+02 6/15/2008 6.32E+02 6.32E+02 6/16/2008 7.61E+02 7.61E+02 6/17/2008 7.58E+02 7.58E+02 6/18/2008 8.51E+02 8.51E+02 6/19/2008 6.19E+02 6.19E+02 6/20/2008 8.03E+02 8.03E+02 6/21/2008 7.21E+02 7.21E+02 6/22/2008 6.46E+02 6.46E+02 6/23/2008 7.47E+02 7.47E+02 6/24/2008 6.09E+02 6.09E+02 6/25/2008 7.93E+02 7.93E+02 6/26/2008 6.82E+02 6.82E+02 6/27/2008 6.08E+02 6.08E+02 6/28/2008 3.65E+02 3.65E+02 6/29/2008 5.07E+02 5.07E+02 6/30/2008 4.21E+02 4.21E+02 7/1/2008 2.31E+02 2.31E+02 7/2/2008 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 7/3/2008 4.32E+02 4.32E+02 7/4/2008 3.79E+02 3.79E+02 7/5/2008 4.67E+02 4.67E+02 7/6/2008 5.03E+02 5.03E+02 7/7/2008 4.16E+02 4.16E+02 7/8/2008 3.80E+02 3.80E+02 7/9/2008 4.67E+02 4.67E+02 7/10/2008 8.42E+02 8.42E+02 7/11/2008 6.28E+02 6.28E+02 7/12/2008 7.31E+02 7.31E+02 7/13/2008 7.64E+02 7.64E+02 7/14/2008 7.32E+02 7.32E+02 7/15/2008 6.28E+02 6.28E+02 7/16/2008 8.64E+02 8.64E+02 7/17/2008 8.93E+02 8.93E+02 7/18/2008 4.85E+02 4.85E+02 7/19/2008 5.50E+02 5.50E+02 7/20/2008 5.40E+02 5.40E+02 7/21/2008 5.48E+02 5.48E+02 7/22/2008 4.87E+02 4.87E+02 7/23/2008 4.78E+02 4.78E+02 7/24/2008 4.60E+02 4.60E+02 7/25/2008 #DIV/0! 7/26/2008 #DIV/0! 7/27/2008 5.54E+02 5.54E+02 7/28/2008 #DIV/0! 7/29/2008 #DIV/0! 7/30/2008 #DIV/0! 7/31/2008 4.45E+02 4.45E+02 8/1/2008 5.31E+02 5.31E+02 8/2/2008 #DIV/0! 8/3/2008 #DIV/0! 8/4/2008 3.05E+02 3.05E+02 8/5/2008 5.42E+02 5.42E+02 8/6/2008 2.89E+02 2.89E+02 8/7/2008 2.52E+02 2.52E+02 8/8/2008 5.50E+02 5.50E+02 8/9/2008 #DIV/0! 8/10/2008 #DIV/0! 8/11/2008 1.13E+03 1.13E+03 8/12/2008 7.79E+02 7.79E+02 8/13/2008 9.69E+02 9.69E+02 8/14/2008 7.48E+02 7.48E+02 8/15/2008 5.47E+02 5.47E+02 8/16/2008 #DIV/0! 8/17/2008 #DIV/0! 8/18/2008 3.58E+02 3.58E+02 8/19/2008 8.47E+02 8.47E+02 8/20/2008 2.39E+02 2.39E+02 8/21/2008 3.63E+02 3.63E+02 8/22/2008 4.44E+02 4.44E+02 8/23/2008 4.68E+02 4.68E+02 8/24/2008 5.98E+02 5.98E+02 8/25/2008 4.85E+02 4.85E+02 8/26/2008 5.42E+02 5.42E+02 8/27/2008 5.20E+02 5.20E+02 8/28/2008 3.85E+02 3.85E+02 8/29/2008 3.70E+02 3.70E+02 8/30/2008 #DIV/0! 8/31/2008 #DIV/0! 9/1/2008 7.69E+02 7.69E+02 9/2/2008 6.87E+02 6.87E+02 9/3/2008 7.32E+02 7.32E+02 9/4/2008 6.27E+02 6.27E+02 9/5/2008 5.30E+02 5.30E+02 9/6/2008 5.89E+02 5.89E+02 9/7/2008 6.27E+02 6.27E+02 9/8/2008 8.40E+02 8.40E+02 9/9/2008 8.24E+02 8.24E+02 9/10/2008 8.61E+02 8.61E+02 9/11/2008 6.01E+02 6.01E+02 9/12/2008 5.59E+02 5.59E+02 9/13/2008 3.60E+02 3.60E+02 9/14/2008 4.30E+02 4.30E+02 9/15/2008 4.76E+02 4.76E+02 9/16/2008 4.47E+02 4.47E+02 9/17/2008 6.04E+02 6.04E+02 9/18/2008 8.37E+02 8.37E+02 9/19/2008 6.92E+02 6.92E+02 9/20/2008 #DIV/0! 9/21/2008 #DIV/0! 9/22/2008 1.01E+03 1.01E+03 9/23/2008 6.72E+02 6.72E+02 9/24/2008 5.03E+02 5.03E+02 9/25/2008 6.83E+02 6.83E+02 9/26/2008 6.38E+02 6.38E+02 9/27/2008 5.85E+02 5.85E+02 9/28/2008 #DIV/0! 9/29/2008 7.49E+02 7.49E+02



# 136

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

9/30/2008 4.62E+02 4.62E+02 10/1/2008 6.33E+02 6.33E+02 10/2/2008 6.54E+02 6.54E+02 10/3/2008 5.32E+02 5.32E+02 10/4/2008 #DIV/0! 10/5/2008 #DIV/0! 10/6/2008 6.96E+02 6.96E+02 10/7/2008 4.41E+02 4.41E+02 10/8/2008 8.49E+02 8.49E+02 10/9/2008 7.49E+02 7.49E+02 10/10/2008 7.11E+02 7.11E+02 10/11/2008 6.04E+02 6.04E+02 10/12/2008 6.69E+02 6.69E+02 10/13/2008 7.13E+02 7.13E+02 10/14/2008 6.95E+02 6.95E+02 10/15/2008 6.35E+02 6.35E+02 10/16/2008 5.22E+02 5.22E+02 10/17/2008 4.31E+02 4.31E+02 10/18/2008 5.78E+02 5.78E+02 10/19/2008 6.76E+02 6.76E+02 10/20/2008 5.70E+02 5.70E+02 10/21/2008 4.31E+02 4.31E+02 10/22/2008 7.23E+02 7.23E+02 10/23/2008 5.77E+02 5.77E+02 10/24/2008 8.78E+02 8.78E+02 10/25/2008 6.28E+02 6.28E+02 10/26/2008 8.36E+02 8.36E+02 10/27/2008 6.52E+02 6.52E+02 10/28/2008 6.97E+02 6.97E+02 10/29/2008 1.19E+03 1.19E+03 10/30/2008 8.65E+02 8.65E+02 10/31/2008 7.80E+02 7.80E+02 11/1/2008 6.54E+02 6.54E+02 11/2/2008 6.94E+02 6.94E+02 11/3/2008 9.73E+02 9.73E+02 11/4/2008 8.29E+02 8.29E+02 11/5/2008 6.58E+02 6.58E+02 11/6/2008 5.13E+02 5.13E+02 11/7/2008 5.90E+02 5.90E+02 11/8/2008 4.09E+02 4.09E+02 11/9/2008 4.81E+02 4.81E+02 11/10/2008 4.12E+02 4.12E+02 11/11/2008 4.69E+02 4.69E+02 11/12/2008 5.84E+02 5.84E+02 11/13/2008 5.20E+02 5.20E+02 11/14/2008 5.79E+02 5.79E+02 11/15/2008 6.08E+02 6.08E+02 11/16/2008 4.75E+02 4.75E+02 11/17/2008 6.53E+02 6.53E+02 11/18/2008 5.05E+02 5.05E+02 11/19/2008 #DIV/0! 11/20/2008 #DIV/0! 11/21/2008 #DIV/0! 11/22/2008 #DIV/0! 11/23/2008 #DIV/0! 11/24/2008 #DIV/0! 11/25/2008 #DIV/0! 11/26/2008 #DIV/0! 11/27/2008 #DIV/0! 11/28/2008 #DIV/0! 11/29/2008 #DIV/0! 11/30/2008 #DIV/0! 12/1/2008 #DIV/0! 12/2/2008 #DIV/0! 12/3/2008 #DIV/0! 12/4/2008 #DIV/0! 12/5/2008 #DIV/0! 12/6/2008 #DIV/0! 12/7/2008 #DIV/0! 12/8/2008 7.77E+02 7.77E+02 12/9/2008 8.10E+02 8.10E+02 12/10/2008 5.39E+02 5.39E+02 12/11/2008 4.60E+02 4.60E+02 12/12/2008 6.99E+02 6.99E+02 12/13/2008 6.05E+02 6.05E+02 12/14/2008 5.89E+02 5.89E+02 12/15/2008 5.75E+02 5.75E+02 12/16/2008 5.26E+02 5.26E+02 12/17/2008 4.17E+02 4.17E+02 12/18/2008 4.70E+02 4.70E+02 12/19/2008 #DIV/0! 12/20/2008 #DIV/0! 12/21/2008 #DIV/0! 12/22/2008 #DIV/0! 12/23/2008 #DIV/0! 12/24/2008 #DIV/0! 12/25/2008 #DIV/0! 12/26/2008 #DIV/0! 12/27/2008 #DIV/0! 12/28/2008 #DIV/0! 12/29/2008 #DIV/0! 12/30/2008 #DIV/0! 12/31/2008 #DIV/0! 1/1/2009 #DIV/0! 1/2/2009 #DIV/0! 1/3/2009 #DIV/0! 1/4/2009 #DIV/0! 1/5/2009 #DIV/0! 1/6/2009 4.25E+02 4.25E+02 1/7/2009 3.94E+02 3.94E+02 1/8/2009 4.91E+02 4.91E+02 1/9/2009 5.66E+02 5.66E+02 1/10/2009 4.09E+02 4.09E+02 1/11/2009 3.81E+02 3.81E+02 1/12/2009 2.80E+02 2.80E+02 1/13/2009 #DIV/0! 1/14/2009 #DIV/0! 1/15/2009 #DIV/0! 1/16/2009 #DIV/0! 1/17/2009 #DIV/0! 1/18/2009 #DIV/0! 1/19/2009 #DIV/0! 1/20/2009 #DIV/0! 1/21/2009 #DIV/0! 1/22/2009 #DIV/0! 1/23/2009 #DIV/0! 1/24/2009 #DIV/0! 1/25/2009 #DIV/0! 1/26/2009 #DIV/0! 1/27/2009 #DIV/0! 1/28/2009 3.57E+02 3.57E+02 1/29/2009 5.43E+02 5.43E+02 1/30/2009 6.92E+02 6.92E+02 1/31/2009 6.26E+02 6.26E+02 2/1/2009 8.94E+02 8.94E+02 2/2/2009 1.02E+03 1.02E+03 2/3/2009 7.22E+02 7.22E+02 2/4/2009 #DIV/0! 2/5/2009 #DIV/0! 2/6/2009 7.43E+02 7.43E+02



# 137

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

2/7/2009 8.54E+02 8.54E+02 2/8/2009 5.36E+02 5.36E+02 2/9/2009 4.76E+02 4.76E+02 2/10/2009 6.44E+02 6.44E+02 2/11/2009 4.04E+02 4.04E+02 2/12/2009 4.45E+02 4.45E+02 2/13/2009 5.79E+02 5.79E+02 2/14/2009 5.75E+02 5.75E+02 2/15/2009 #DIV/0! 2/16/2009 #DIV/0! 2/17/2009 #DIV/0! 2/18/2009 #DIV/0! 2/19/2009 #DIV/0! 2/20/2009 #DIV/0! 2/21/2009 #DIV/0! 2/22/2009 #DIV/0! 2/23/2009 #DIV/0! 2/24/2009 #DIV/0! 2/25/2009 #DIV/0! 2/26/2009 #DIV/0! 2/27/2009 #DIV/0! 2/28/2009 #DIV/0! 3/1/2009 #DIV/0! 3/2/2009 #DIV/0! 3/3/2009 #DIV/0! 3/4/2009 3.25E+02 3.25E+02 3/5/2009 3.62E+02 3.62E+02 3/6/2009 3.12E+02 3.12E+02 3/7/2009 3.98E+02 3.98E+02 3/8/2009 3.69E+02 3.69E+02 3/9/2009 3.48E+02 3.48E+02 3/10/2009 2.68E+02 2.68E+02 3/11/2009 2.90E+02 2.90E+02 3/12/2009 4.70E+02 4.70E+02 3/13/2009 3.13E+02 3.13E+02 3/14/2009 4.99E+02 4.99E+02 3/15/2009 3.99E+02 3.99E+02 3/16/2009 2.78E+02 2.78E+02 3/17/2009 3.95E+02 3.95E+02 3/18/2009 3.72E+02 3.72E+02 3/19/2009 3.54E+02 3.54E+02 3/20/2009 3.47E+02 3.47E+02 3/21/2009 6.26E+02 6.26E+02 3/22/2009 4.17E+02 4.17E+02 3/23/2009 5.32E+02 5.32E+02 3/24/2009 5.01E+02 5.01E+02 3/25/2009 #DIV/0! 3/26/2009 #DIV/0! 3/27/2009 #DIV/0! 3/28/2009 #DIV/0! 3/29/2009 #DIV/0! 3/30/2009 4.20E+02 4.20E+02 3/31/2009 6.08E+02 6.08E+02 4/1/2009 4.93E+02 4.93E+02 4/2/2009 4.14E+02 4.14E+02 4/3/2009 4.45E+02 4.45E+02 4/4/2009 4.86E+02 4.86E+02 4/5/2009 6.26E+02 6.26E+02 4/6/2009 4.82E+02 4.82E+02 4/7/2009 7.67E+02 7.67E+02 4/8/2009 7.65E+02 7.65E+02 4/9/2009 1.02E+03 1.02E+03 4/10/2009 #DIV/0! 4/11/2009 #DIV/0! 4/12/2009 #DIV/0! 4/13/2009 #DIV/0! 4/14/2009 #DIV/0! 4/15/2009 #DIV/0! 4/16/2009 #DIV/0! 4/17/2009 #DIV/0! 4/18/2009 4.80E+02 4.80E+02 4/19/2009 5.47E+02 5.47E+02 4/20/2009 5.25E+02 5.25E+02 4/21/2009 4.37E+02 4.37E+02 4/22/2009 4.79E+02 4.79E+02 4/23/2009 4.86E+02 4.86E+02 4/24/2009 3.28E+02 3.28E+02 4/25/2009 #DIV/0! 4/26/2009 #DIV/0! 4/27/2009 3.05E+02 3.05E+02 4/28/2009 1.44E+02 1.44E+02 4/29/2009 3.90E+02 3.90E+02 4/30/2009 3.87E+02 3.87E+02 5/1/2009 4.74E+02 4.74E+02 5/2/2009 4.85E+02 4.85E+02 5/3/2009 6.30E+02 6.30E+02 5/4/2009 4.03E+02 4.03E+02 5/5/2009 3.24E+02 3.24E+02 5/6/2009 3.35E+02 3.35E+02 5/7/2009 3.56E+02 3.56E+02 5/8/2009 4.84E+02 4.84E+02 5/9/2009 4.88E+02 4.88E+02 5/10/2009 4.21E+02 4.21E+02 5/11/2009 4.97E+02 4.97E+02 5/12/2009 4.79E+02 4.79E+02 5/13/2009 3.15E+02 3.15E+02 5/14/2009 3.71E+02 3.71E+02 5/15/2009 6.07E+02 6.07E+02 5/16/2009 #DIV/0! 5/17/2009 #DIV/0! 5/18/2009 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 5/19/2009 #DIV/0! 5/20/2009 #DIV/0! 5/21/2009 #DIV/0! 5/22/2009 5.55E+02 5.55E+02 5/23/2009 7.19E+02 7.19E+02 5/24/2009 5.98E+02 5.98E+02 5/25/2009 #DIV/0! 5/26/2009 #DIV/0! 5/27/2009 7.52E+02 7.52E+02 5/28/2009 8.06E+02 8.06E+02 5/29/2009 7.20E+02 7.20E+02 5/30/2009 #DIV/0! 5/31/2009 #DIV/0! 6/1/2009 5.70E+02 5.70E+02 6/2/2009 3.88E+02 3.88E+02 6/3/2009 4.18E+02 4.18E+02 6/4/2009 3.24E+02 3.24E+02 6/5/2009 3.26E+02 3.26E+02 6/6/2009 4.63E+02 4.63E+02 6/7/2009 5.40E+02 5.40E+02 6/8/2009 4.66E+02 4.66E+02 6/9/2009 4.75E+02 4.75E+02 6/10/2009 5.40E+02 5.40E+02 6/11/2009 5.21E+02 5.21E+02 6/12/2009 3.75E+02 3.75E+02 6/13/2009 5.04E+02 5.04E+02 6/14/2009 5.00E+02 5.00E+02 6/15/2009 4.17E+02 4.17E+02 6/16/2009 2.68E+02 2.68E+02



# 138

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

6/17/2009 4.62E+02 4.62E+02 6/18/2009 4.90E+02 4.90E+02 6/19/2009 9.48E+02 9.48E+02 6/20/2009 #DIV/0! 6/21/2009 #DIV/0! 6/22/2009 5.77E+02 5.77E+02 6/23/2009 7.49E+02 7.49E+02 6/24/2009 5.95E+02 5.95E+02 6/25/2009 6.81E+02 6.81E+02 6/26/2009 5.70E+02 5.70E+02 6/27/2009 8.12E+02 8.12E+02 6/28/2009 #DIV/0! 6/29/2009 3.60E+02 3.60E+02 6/30/2009 #DIV/0! 7/1/2009 2.07E+02 2.07E+02 7/2/2009 3.77E+02 3.77E+02 7/3/2009 #DIV/0! 7/4/2009 #DIV/0! 7/5/2009 #DIV/0! 7/6/2009 4.21E+02 4.21E+02 7/7/2009 5.31E+02 5.31E+02 7/8/2009 5.49E+02 5.49E+02 7/9/2009 6.04E+02 6.04E+02 7/10/2009 7.69E+02 7.69E+02 7/11/2009 5.41E+02 5.41E+02 7/12/2009 5.21E+02 5.21E+02 7/13/2009 3.98E+02 3.98E+02 7/14/2009 4.97E+02 4.97E+02 7/15/2009 5.66E+02 5.66E+02 7/16/2009 8.74E+02 8.74E+02 7/17/2009 4.59E+02 4.59E+02 7/18/2009 8.07E+02 8.07E+02 7/19/2009 2.56E+02 2.56E+02 7/20/2009 3.84E+02 3.84E+02 7/21/2009 3.49E+02 3.49E+02 7/22/2009 5.14E+02 5.14E+02 7/23/2009 3.25E+02 3.25E+02 7/24/2009 5.09E+02 5.09E+02 7/25/2009 3.85E+02 3.85E+02 7/26/2009 3.10E+02 3.10E+02 7/27/2009 2.52E+02 2.52E+02 7/28/2009 4.49E+02 4.49E+02 7/29/2009 4.04E+02 4.04E+02 7/30/2009 6.01E+02 6.01E+02 7/31/2009 3.48E+02 3.48E+02 8/1/2009 3.44E+02 3.44E+02 8/2/2009 6.31E+02 6.31E+02 8/3/2009 4.27E+02 4.27E+02 8/4/2009 4.39E+02 4.39E+02 8/5/2009 4.63E+02 4.63E+02 8/6/2009 3.50E+02 3.50E+02 8/7/2009 3.83E+02 3.83E+02 8/8/2009 4.38E+02 4.38E+02 8/9/2009 5.47E+02 5.47E+02 8/10/2009 6.41E+02 6.41E+02 8/11/2009 6.35E+02 6.35E+02 8/12/2009 6.90E+02 6.90E+02 8/13/2009 6.44E+02 6.44E+02 8/14/2009 5.84E+02 5.84E+02 8/15/2009 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 8/16/2009 7.17E+02 7.17E+02 8/17/2009 4.39E+02 4.39E+02 8/18/2009 4.48E+02 4.48E+02 8/19/2009 3.76E+02 3.76E+02 8/20/2009 2.79E+02 2.79E+02 8/21/2009 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 8/22/2009 4.06E+02 4.06E+02 8/23/2009 3.84E+02 3.84E+02 8/24/2009 3.57E+02 3.57E+02 8/25/2009 3.99E+02 3.99E+02 8/26/2009 4.17E+02 4.17E+02 8/27/2009 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 8/28/2009 4.18E+02 4.18E+02 8/29/2009 5.13E+02 5.13E+02 8/30/2009 6.27E+02 6.27E+02 8/31/2009 9.29E+02 9.29E+02 9/1/2009 7.20E+02 7.20E+02 9/2/2009 5.57E+02 5.57E+02 9/3/2009 6.03E+02 6.03E+02 9/4/2009 4.76E+02 4.76E+02 9/5/2009 4.99E+02 4.99E+02 9/6/2009 6.22E+02 6.22E+02 9/7/2009 8.02E+02 8.02E+02 9/8/2009 5.64E+02 5.64E+02 9/9/2009 5.53E+02 5.53E+02 9/10/2009 5.31E+02 5.31E+02 9/11/2009 6.37E+02 6.37E+02 9/12/2009 5.76E+02 5.76E+02 9/13/2009 5.98E+02 5.98E+02 9/14/2009 4.38E+02 4.38E+02 9/15/2009 5.50E+02 5.50E+02 9/16/2009 5.92E+02 5.92E+02 9/17/2009 3.55E+02 3.55E+02 9/18/2009 5.11E+02 5.11E+02 9/19/2009 3.71E+02 3.71E+02 9/20/2009 5.88E+02 5.88E+02 9/21/2009 5.73E+02 5.73E+02 9/22/2009 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 9/23/2009 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 9/24/2009 3.94E+02 3.94E+02 9/25/2009 3.60E+02 3.60E+02 9/26/2009 3.11E+02 3.11E+02 9/27/2009 4.24E+02 4.24E+02 9/28/2009 4.34E+02 4.34E+02 9/29/2009 4.73E+02 4.73E+02 9/30/2009 4.54E+02 4.54E+02 10/1/2009 5.03E+02 5.03E+02 10/2/2009 5.50E+02 5.50E+02 10/3/2009 6.22E+02 6.22E+02 10/4/2009 6.36E+02 6.36E+02 10/5/2009 5.05E+02 5.05E+02 10/6/2009 4.94E+02 4.94E+02 10/7/2009 4.90E+02 4.90E+02 10/8/2009 6.90E+02 6.90E+02 10/9/2009 4.76E+02 4.76E+02 10/10/2009 7.66E+02 7.66E+02 10/11/2009 1.36E+02 1.36E+02 10/12/2009 4.05E+02 4.05E+02 10/13/2009 5.64E+02 5.64E+02 10/14/2009 6.15E+02 6.15E+02 10/15/2009 4.01E+02 4.01E+02 10/16/2009 5.30E+02 5.30E+02 10/17/2009 6.91E+02 6.91E+02 10/18/2009 6.29E+02 6.29E+02 10/19/2009 7.84E+02 7.84E+02 10/20/2009 5.21E+02 5.21E+02 10/21/2009 4.05E+02 4.05E+02 10/22/2009 4.90E+02 4.90E+02 10/23/2009 4.65E+02 4.65E+02 10/24/2009 3.58E+02 3.58E+02



# 139

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

10/25/2009 6.58E+02 6.58E+02 10/26/2009 5.31E+02 5.31E+02 10/27/2009 5.32E+02 5.32E+02 10/28/2009 3.18E+02 3.18E+02 10/29/2009 8.04E+02 8.04E+02 10/30/2009 7.02E+02 7.02E+02 10/31/2009 1.99E+02 1.99E+02 11/1/2009 5.35E+02 5.35E+02 11/2/2009 5.41E+02 5.41E+02 11/3/2009 3.46E+02 3.46E+02 11/4/2009 6.33E+02 6.33E+02 11/5/2009 4.69E+02 4.69E+02 11/6/2009 4.34E+02 4.34E+02 11/7/2009 5.16E+02 5.16E+02 11/8/2009 5.86E+02 5.86E+02 11/9/2009 4.05E+02 4.05E+02 11/10/2009 4.61E+02 4.61E+02 11/11/2009 5.98E+02 5.98E+02 11/12/2009 1.03E+03 1.03E+03 11/13/2009 5.81E+02 5.81E+02 11/14/2009 4.40E+02 4.40E+02 11/15/2009 5.02E+02 5.02E+02 11/16/2009 3.74E+02 3.74E+02 11/17/2009 4.57E+02 4.57E+02 11/18/2009 4.35E+02 4.35E+02 11/19/2009 2.66E+02 2.66E+02 11/20/2009 7.69E+02 7.69E+02 11/21/2009 8.37E+02 8.37E+02 11/22/2009 1.20E+03 1.20E+03 11/23/2009 7.45E+02 7.45E+02 11/24/2009 8.53E+02 8.53E+02 11/25/2009 6.44E+02 6.44E+02 11/26/2009 1.22E+03 1.22E+03 11/27/2009 8.09E+02 8.09E+02 11/28/2009 2.21E+02 2.21E+02 11/29/2009 3.24E+02 3.24E+02 11/30/2009 3.29E+02 3.29E+02 12/1/2009 3.28E+02 3.28E+02 12/2/2009 2.28E+02 2.28E+02 12/3/2009 5.20E+02 5.20E+02 12/4/2009 5.21E+02 5.21E+02 12/5/2009 4.67E+02 4.67E+02 12/6/2009 7.20E+02 7.20E+02 12/7/2009 6.73E+02 6.73E+02 12/8/2009 5.32E+02 5.32E+02 12/9/2009 6.78E+02 6.78E+02 12/10/2009 4.21E+02 4.21E+02 12/11/2009 5.48E+02 5.48E+02 12/12/2009 4.77E+02 4.77E+02 12/13/2009 4.26E+02 4.26E+02 12/14/2009 5.38E+02 5.38E+02 12/15/2009 5.65E+02 5.65E+02 12/16/2009 4.54E+02 4.54E+02 12/17/2009 5.09E+02 5.09E+02 12/18/2009 4.00E+02 4.00E+02 12/19/2009 8.22E+02 8.22E+02 12/20/2009 6.02E+02 6.02E+02 12/21/2009 1.12E+03 1.12E+03 12/22/2009 #DIV/0! 12/23/2009 1.20E+03 1.20E+03 12/24/2009 5.31E+02 5.31E+02 12/25/2009 1.03E+03 1.03E+03 12/26/2009 1.04E+03 1.04E+03 12/27/2009 6.80E+02 6.80E+02 12/28/2009 5.70E+02 5.70E+02 12/29/2009 8.68E+02 8.68E+02 12/30/2009 8.53E+02 8.53E+02 12/31/2009 6.44E+02 6.44E+02 1/1/2010 3.06E+02 3.06E+02 1/2/2010 3.73E+02 3.73E+02 1/3/2010 6.43E+02 6.43E+02 1/4/2010 3.11E+02 3.11E+02 1/5/2010 2.38E+02 2.38E+02 1/6/2010 2.00E+02 2.00E+02 1/7/2010 4.52E+02 4.52E+02 1/8/2010 3.09E+02 3.09E+02 1/9/2010 5.93E+02 5.93E+02 1/10/2010 7.19E+02 7.19E+02 1/11/2010 3.41E+02 3.41E+02 1/12/2010 3.84E+02 3.84E+02 1/13/2010 5.17E+02 5.17E+02 1/14/2010 3.72E+02 3.72E+02 1/15/2010 3.94E+02 3.94E+02 1/16/2010 6.61E+02 6.61E+02 1/17/2010 7.40E+02 7.40E+02 1/18/2010 5.47E+02 5.47E+02 1/19/2010 1.25E+03 1.25E+03 1/20/2010 9.25E+02 9.25E+02 1/21/2010 8.20E+02 8.20E+02 1/22/2010 1.16E+03 1.16E+03 1/23/2010 7.71E+02 7.71E+02 1/24/2010 7.29E+02 7.29E+02 1/25/2010 4.45E+02 4.45E+02 1/26/2010 7.39E+02 7.39E+02 1/27/2010 5.20E+02 5.20E+02 1/28/2010 8.92E+02 8.92E+02 1/29/2010 5.87E+02 5.87E+02 1/30/2010 9.63E+02 9.63E+02 1/31/2010 8.73E+02 8.73E+02 2/1/2010 5.00E+02 5.00E+02 2/2/2010 5.81E+02 5.81E+02 2/3/2010 8.23E+02 8.23E+02 2/4/2010 5.82E+02 5.82E+02 2/5/2010 6.52E+02 6.52E+02 2/6/2010 5.59E+02 5.59E+02 2/7/2010 5.88E+02 5.88E+02 2/8/2010 6.05E+02 6.05E+02 2/9/2010 8.39E+02 8.39E+02 2/10/2010 5.85E+02 5.85E+02 2/11/2010 6.38E+02 6.38E+02 2/12/2010 6.98E+02 6.98E+02 2/13/2010 2.79E+02 2.79E+02 2/14/2010 3.04E+02 3.04E+02 2/15/2010 7.45E+02 7.45E+02 2/16/2010 4.84E+02 4.84E+02 2/17/2010 5.36E+02 5.36E+02 2/18/2010 3.94E+02 3.94E+02 2/19/2010 5.14E+02 5.14E+02 2/20/2010 3.69E+02 3.69E+02 2/21/2010 1.87E+02 1.87E+02 2/22/2010 2.83E+02 2.83E+02 2/23/2010 3.78E+02 3.78E+02 2/24/2010 1.71E+02 1.71E+02 2/25/2010 2.27E+02 2.27E+02 2/26/2010 3.27E+02 3.27E+02 2/27/2010 2.38E+02 2.38E+02 2/28/2010 2.15E+02 2.15E+02 3/1/2010 6.60E+02 6.60E+02 3/2/2010 6.31E+02 6.31E+02 3/3/2010 6.76E+02 6.76E+02



# 140

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

3/4/2010 #DIV/0! 3/5/2010 8.09E+02 8.09E+02 3/6/2010 6.53E+02 6.53E+02 3/7/2010 7.38E+02 7.38E+02 3/8/2010 5.90E+02 5.90E+02 3/9/2010 7.42E+02 7.42E+02 3/10/2010 6.28E+02 6.28E+02 3/11/2010 7.31E+02 7.31E+02 3/12/2010 6.39E+02 6.39E+02 3/13/2010 5.68E+02 5.68E+02 3/14/2010 5.89E+02 5.89E+02 3/15/2010 6.98E+02 6.98E+02 3/16/2010 8.18E+02 8.18E+02 3/17/2010 4.74E+02 4.74E+02 3/18/2010 4.72E+02 4.72E+02 3/19/2010 5.76E+02 5.76E+02 3/20/2010 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 3/21/2010 4.25E+02 4.25E+02 3/22/2010 4.43E+02 4.43E+02 3/23/2010 4.15E+02 4.15E+02 3/24/2010 5.52E+02 5.52E+02 3/25/2010 5.52E+02 5.52E+02 3/26/2010 5.67E+02 5.67E+02 3/27/2010 7.52E+02 7.52E+02 3/28/2010 4.65E+02 4.65E+02 3/29/2010 4.09E+02 4.09E+02 3/30/2010 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3/31/2010 6.06E+02 6.06E+02 4/1/2010 1.02E+03 1.02E+03 4/2/2010 1.56E+02 1.56E+02 4/3/2010 3.49E+02 3.49E+02 4/4/2010 3.48E+02 3.48E+02 4/5/2010 3.18E+02 3.18E+02 4/6/2010 4.50E+02 4.50E+02 4/7/2010 2.59E+02 2.59E+02 4/8/2010 3.18E+02 3.18E+02 4/9/2010 3.10E+02 3.10E+02 4/10/2010 4.20E+02 4.20E+02 4/11/2010 3.73E+02 3.73E+02 4/12/2010 4.58E+02 4.58E+02 4/13/2010 4.02E+02 4.02E+02 4/14/2010 7.34E+02 7.34E+02 4/15/2010 4.74E+02 4.74E+02 4/16/2010 8.19E+02 8.19E+02 4/17/2010 4.81E+02 4.81E+02 4/18/2010 6.83E+02 6.83E+02 4/19/2010 3.27E+02 3.27E+02 4/20/2010 5.94E+02 5.94E+02 4/21/2010 5.57E+02 5.57E+02 4/22/2010 4.97E+02 4.97E+02 4/23/2010 6.07E+02 6.07E+02 4/24/2010 5.49E+02 5.49E+02 4/25/2010 8.99E+02 8.99E+02 4/26/2010 6.72E+02 6.72E+02 4/27/2010 7.47E+02 7.47E+02 4/28/2010 6.60E+02 6.60E+02 4/29/2010 4.61E+02 4.61E+02 4/30/2010 5.16E+02 5.16E+02 5/1/2010 7.37E+02 7.37E+02 5/2/2010 6.32E+02 6.32E+02 5/3/2010 7.05E+02 7.05E+02 5/4/2010 6.66E+02 6.66E+02 5/5/2010 6.50E+02 6.50E+02 5/6/2010 3.50E+02 3.50E+02 5/7/2010 4.16E+02 4.16E+02 5/8/2010 4.51E+02 4.51E+02 5/9/2010 3.92E+02 3.92E+02 5/10/2010 3.83E+02 3.83E+02 5/11/2010 4.16E+02 4.16E+02 5/12/2010 3.16E+02 3.16E+02 5/13/2010 1.92E+02 1.92E+02 5/14/2010 3.98E+02 3.98E+02 5/15/2010 5.77E+02 5.77E+02 5/16/2010 5.33E+02 5.33E+02 5/17/2010 4.74E+02 4.74E+02 5/18/2010 8.19E+02 8.19E+02 5/19/2010 7.77E+02 7.77E+02 5/20/2010 4.49E+02 4.49E+02 5/21/2010 3.36E+02 3.36E+02 5/22/2010 4.18E+02 4.18E+02 5/23/2010 3.81E+02 3.81E+02 5/24/2010 7.21E+02 7.21E+02 5/25/2010 6.85E+02 6.85E+02 5/26/2010 7.63E+02 7.63E+02 5/27/2010 7.58E+02 7.58E+02 5/28/2010 6.87E+02 6.87E+02 5/29/2010 6.35E+02 6.35E+02 5/30/2010 9.25E+02 9.25E+02 5/31/2010 2.16E+02 2.16E+02 6/1/2010 2.49E+02 2.49E+02 6/2/2010 1.00E+02 1.00E+02 6/3/2010 3.47E+02 3.47E+02 6/4/2010 6.84E+02 6.84E+02 6/5/2010 4.64E+02 4.64E+02 6/6/2010 4.54E+02 4.54E+02 6/7/2010 2.88E+02 2.88E+02 6/8/2010 3.48E+02 3.48E+02 6/9/2010 3.05E+02 3.05E+02 6/10/2010 3.40E+02 3.40E+02 6/11/2010 3.40E+02 3.40E+02 6/12/2010 3.30E+02 3.30E+02 6/13/2010 3.50E+02 3.50E+02 6/14/2010 3.65E+02 3.65E+02 6/15/2010 4.14E+02 4.14E+02 6/16/2010 5.84E+02 5.84E+02 6/17/2010 4.72E+02 4.72E+02 6/18/2010 5.38E+02 5.38E+02 6/19/2010 4.95E+02 4.95E+02 6/20/2010 5.28E+02 5.28E+02 6/21/2010 4.41E+02 4.41E+02 6/22/2010 5.04E+02 5.04E+02 6/23/2010 5.23E+02 5.23E+02 6/24/2010 4.16E+02 4.16E+02 6/25/2010 5.15E+02 5.15E+02 6/26/2010 4.66E+02 4.66E+02 6/27/2010 5.11E+02 5.11E+02 6/28/2010 3.54E+02 3.54E+02 6/29/2010 5.11E+02 5.11E+02 6/30/2010 4.22E+02 4.22E+02 7/1/2010 5.62E+02 5.62E+02 7/2/2010 7.45E+02 7.45E+02 7/3/2010 6.61E+02 6.61E+02 7/4/2010 5.99E+02 5.99E+02 7/5/2010 4.99E+02 4.99E+02 7/6/2010 7.77E+02 7.77E+02 7/7/2010 4.05E+02 4.05E+02 7/8/2010 6.28E+02 6.28E+02 7/9/2010 7.22E+02 7.22E+02 7/10/2010 6.44E+02 6.44E+02 7/11/2010 5.27E+02 5.27E+02



# 141

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

7/12/2010 4.55E+02 4.55E+02 7/13/2010 5.05E+02 5.05E+02 7/14/2010 4.19E+02 4.19E+02 7/15/2010 5.48E+02 5.48E+02 7/16/2010 4.64E+02 4.64E+02 7/17/2010 5.38E+02 5.38E+02 7/18/2010 3.85E+02 3.85E+02 7/19/2010 4.21E+02 4.21E+02 7/20/2010 5.63E+02 5.63E+02 7/21/2010 5.58E+02 5.58E+02 7/22/2010 5.88E+02 5.88E+02 7/23/2010 5.87E+02 5.87E+02 7/24/2010 6.73E+02 6.73E+02 7/25/2010 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 7/26/2010 1.00E+03 1.00E+03 7/27/2010 6.35E+02 6.35E+02 7/28/2010 5.26E+02 5.26E+02 7/29/2010 4.39E+02 4.39E+02 7/30/2010 5.99E+02 5.99E+02 7/31/2010 3.87E+02 3.87E+02 8/1/2010 4.48E+02 4.48E+02 8/2/2010 4.39E+02 4.39E+02 8/3/2010 3.70E+02 3.70E+02 8/4/2010 3.92E+02 3.92E+02 8/5/2010 4.25E+02 4.25E+02 8/6/2010 4.10E+02 4.10E+02 8/7/2010 3.99E+02 3.99E+02 8/8/2010 6.43E+02 6.43E+02 8/9/2010 7.73E+02 7.73E+02 8/10/2010 7.36E+02 7.36E+02 8/11/2010 7.79E+02 7.79E+02 8/12/2010 7.10E+02 7.10E+02 8/13/2010 6.69E+02 6.69E+02 8/14/2010 8.29E+02 8.29E+02 8/15/2010 1.44E+03 1.44E+03 8/16/2010 7.36E+02 7.36E+02 8/17/2010 8.86E+02 8.86E+02 8/18/2010 5.97E+02 5.97E+02 8/19/2010 4.84E+02 4.84E+02 8/20/2010 7.84E+02 7.84E+02 8/21/2010 7.05E+02 7.05E+02 8/22/2010 6.88E+02 6.88E+02 8/23/2010 5.87E+02 5.87E+02 8/24/2010 5.67E+02 5.67E+02 8/25/2010 6.86E+02 6.86E+02 8/26/2010 6.44E+02 6.44E+02 8/27/2010 5.79E+02 5.79E+02 8/28/2010 5.80E+02 5.80E+02 8/29/2010 5.79E+02 5.79E+02 8/30/2010 3.75E+02 3.75E+02 8/31/2010 3.00E+02 3.00E+02 9/1/2010 3.43E+02 3.43E+02 9/2/2010 3.52E+02 3.52E+02 9/3/2010 6.15E+02 6.15E+02 9/4/2010 5.74E+02 5.74E+02 9/5/2010 6.76E+02 6.76E+02 9/6/2010 5.60E+02 5.60E+02 9/7/2010 4.97E+02 4.97E+02 9/8/2010 5.75E+02 5.75E+02 9/9/2010 4.96E+02 4.96E+02 9/10/2010 4.87E+02 4.87E+02 9/11/2010 8.80E+02 8.80E+02 9/12/2010 9.69E+02 9.69E+02 9/13/2010 5.18E+02 5.18E+02 9/14/2010 4.56E+02 4.56E+02 9/15/2010 7.16E+02 7.16E+02 9/16/2010 5.36E+02 5.36E+02 9/17/2010 2.30E+02 2.30E+02 9/18/2010 2.83E+02 2.83E+02 9/19/2010 2.61E+02 2.61E+02 9/20/2010 3.52E+02 3.52E+02 9/21/2010 2.82E+02 2.82E+02 9/22/2010 3.18E+02 3.18E+02 9/23/2010 3.67E+02 3.67E+02 9/24/2010 5.19E+02 5.19E+02 9/25/2010 4.50E+02 4.50E+02 9/26/2010 3.92E+02 3.92E+02 9/27/2010 2.99E+02 2.99E+02 9/28/2010 3.17E+02 3.17E+02 9/29/2010 2.44E+02 2.44E+02 9/30/2010 5.66E+02 5.66E+02 10/1/2010 4.51E+02 4.51E+02 10/2/2010 5.40E+02 5.40E+02 10/3/2010 4.66E+02 4.66E+02 10/4/2010 3.19E+02 3.19E+02 10/5/2010 2.84E+02 2.84E+02 10/6/2010 5.19E+02 5.19E+02 10/7/2010 3.37E+02 3.37E+02 10/8/2010 4.10E+02 4.10E+02 10/9/2010 3.83E+02 3.83E+02 10/10/2010 #DIV/0! 10/11/2010 4.58E+02 4.58E+02 10/12/2010 4.43E+02 4.43E+02 10/13/2010 3.78E+02 3.78E+02 10/14/2010 8.01E+02 8.01E+02 10/15/2010 5.98E+02 5.98E+02 10/16/2010 6.41E+02 6.41E+02 10/17/2010 7.28E+02 7.28E+02 10/18/2010 5.36E+02 5.36E+02 10/19/2010 5.40E+02 5.40E+02 10/20/2010 5.14E+02 5.14E+02 10/21/2010 6.55E+02 6.55E+02 10/22/2010 4.52E+02 4.52E+02 10/23/2010 4.11E+02 4.11E+02 10/24/2010 2.93E+02 2.93E+02 10/25/2010 3.02E+02 3.02E+02 10/26/2010 3.01E+02 3.01E+02 10/27/2010 5.13E+02 5.13E+02 10/28/2010 4.05E+02 4.05E+02 10/29/2010 4.15E+02 4.15E+02 10/30/2010 8.78E+02 8.78E+02 10/31/2010 4.38E+02 4.38E+02 11/1/2010 6.52E+02 6.52E+02 11/2/2010 5.56E+02 5.56E+02 11/3/2010 5.57E+02 5.57E+02 11/4/2010 5.08E+02 5.08E+02 11/5/2010 4.92E+02 4.92E+02 11/6/2010 6.26E+02 6.26E+02 11/7/2010 5.99E+02 5.99E+02 11/8/2010 8.67E+02 8.67E+02 11/9/2010 3.65E+02 3.65E+02 11/10/2010 4.70E+02 4.70E+02 11/11/2010 1.40E+03 1.40E+03 11/12/2010 4.61E+02 4.61E+02 11/13/2010 5.15E+02 5.15E+02 11/14/2010 4.99E+02 4.99E+02 11/15/2010 5.21E+02 5.21E+02 11/16/2010 4.62E+02 4.62E+02 11/17/2010 3.45E+02 3.45E+02 11/18/2010 3.89E+02 3.89E+02



# 142

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - VC

11/19/2010 2.25E+02 2.25E+02 11/20/2010 3.77E+02 3.77E+02 11/21/2010 4.81E+02 4.81E+02 11/22/2010 5.27E+02 5.27E+02 11/23/2010 5.39E+02 5.39E+02 11/24/2010 3.74E+02 3.74E+02 11/25/2010 4.56E+02 4.56E+02 11/26/2010 5.46E+02 5.46E+02 11/27/2010 5.20E+02 5.20E+02 11/28/2010 5.69E+02 5.69E+02 11/29/2010 6.50E+02 6.50E+02 11/30/2010 4.88E+02 4.88E+02 12/1/2010 5.70E+02 5.70E+02 12/2/2010 6.69E+02 6.69E+02 12/3/2010 6.67E+02 6.67E+02 12/4/2010 6.14E+02 6.14E+02 12/5/2010 5.29E+02 5.29E+02 12/6/2010 9.22E+02 9.22E+02 12/7/2010 1.61E+03 1.61E+03 12/8/2010 4.80E+02 4.80E+02 12/9/2010 5.66E+02 5.66E+02 12/10/2010 5.23E+02 5.23E+02 12/11/2010 5.61E+02 5.61E+02 12/12/2010 4.53E+02 4.53E+02 12/13/2010 5.76E+02 5.76E+02 12/14/2010 6.07E+02 6.07E+02 12/15/2010 5.44E+02 5.44E+02 12/16/2010 3.97E+02 3.97E+02 12/17/2010 3.57E+02 3.57E+02 12/18/2010 4.70E+02 4.70E+02 12/19/2010 5.37E+02 5.37E+02 12/20/2010 4.35E+02 4.35E+02 12/21/2010 4.20E+02 4.20E+02 12/22/2010 3.34E+02 3.34E+02 12/23/2010 3.80E+02 3.80E+02 12/24/2010 9.17E+02 9.17E+02 12/25/2010 8.10E+02 8.10E+02 12/26/2010 7.58E+02 7.58E+02 12/27/2010 5.59E+02 5.59E+02 12/28/2010 7.55E+02 7.55E+02 12/29/2010 8.63E+02 8.63E+02 12/30/2010 1.08E+03 1.08E+03 12/31/2010 #DIV/0!



# 143

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

GACT Worst Performer Determination

Method Method 8260B Resin Type Dispersion HAP (0=no, 1=yes) 1 Wet Resin From Stripper Bottoms Exclude Data (0=no, 1=y 0

Average of Wet Resin from Stripper Bottoms, ppm Analyte_Std

Reporting Plant Sample Date Acetaldehyde Acetophenone Cumene Ethyl Chloride Ethylene

Dichloride Ethylidene

Dichloride Formaldehyde Methanol Methyl Chloride

FPC DE 1/12/2010 1.06E+01 6.25E+00 7.87E-01 2.46E-01 1.10E+01 2. 20E-01 1/13/2010 9.29E+00 1.01E+01 1.15E+00 7.09E-01 5.90E+00 3. 64E-01 1/14/2010 1.16E+01 5.81E+00 1.03E+00 4.55E-01 1.10E+01 2. 13E-01 1/15/2010 6.69E+00 6.10E+00 6.82E-01 1.40E-01 1.20E+01 2. 40E-01 1/16/2010 1.29E+01 1.02E+01 6.47E-01 2.13E-01 1.20E-01 1. 30E-01 1/17/2010 2.38E+01 1.44E+01 5.69E-01 2.77E-01 1.20E-01 2. 50E-01 1/18/2010 1.41E+01 1.24E+01 5.94E-01 1.40E-01 5.90E+00 2. 50E-01 1/19/2010 1.69E+01 4.38E+00 3.61E-01 1.40E-01 9.80E+00 1. 60E-01 1/20/2010 1.28E+01 1.63E+01 8.86E-01 1.49E-01 9.10E+00 2. 20E-01 1/29/2010 4.70E+01 1.96E+01 1.12E+00 3.74E-01 1.00E+01 8. 49E-01 1/30/2010 3.62E+01 7.29E+00 4.48E-01 1.50E-01 1.00E+01 2. 80E-01 1/31/2010 3.18E+01 4.30E+00 2.72E-01 1.83E-01 1.30E+01 2. 30E-01 2/1/2010 1.14E+01 6.36E+00 3.82E-01 1.40E-01 5.80E+00 2.9 3E-01 2/2/2010 4.00E+00 1.12E+01 1.35E+00 6.90E-01 1.80E-01 2.2 0E-01 2/3/2010 2.53E+00 1.03E+01 1.35E+00 6.80E-01 1.10E-01 4.2 0E-01 2/4/2010 2.68E+00 8.99E+00 1.35E+00 6.80E-01 1.10E-01 2.1 0E-01 2/6/2010 5.32E+00 9.72E+00 1.14E+00 3.90E-01 1.10E+00 2.2 0E-01 2/7/2010 3.84E+00 9.04E+00 1.20E+00 3.61E-01 1.10E+00 5.8 0E-01 2/10/2010 1.43E+00 8.09E+00 4.75E-01 3.43E-01 1.20E+00 1. 20E-01 2/11/2010 2.26E+00 1.46E+01 7.15E-01 5.44E-01 1.20E+00 2. 30E-01 2/13/2010 5.18E-01 6.33E+00 4.44E-01 1.40E-01 1.20E+00 1.20E-01 P1-Henry 12/9/2009 6.60E+00 1.30E+01 6.60E+00 6.60E+00 1.30E+01 12/10/2009 3.70E+00 7.40E+00 3.70E+00 3.70E+00 7.40E+00 12/11/2009 1.40E+00 2.80E+00 1.40E+00 1.40E+00 2.80E+00 12/12/2009 1.80E+00 3.50E+00 1.80E+00 1.80E+00 3.50E+00 12/13/2009 1.80E+00 3.50E+00 1.80E+00 1.80E+00 3.50E+00 12/14/2009 1.70E-01 3.50E-01 1.70E-01 1.70E-01 3.50E-01 12/15/2009 1.80E+00 3.60E+00 1.80E+00 1.80E+00 3.60E+00 12/16/2009 1.60E+00 3.20E+00 1.60E+00 1.60E+00 3.20E+00 12/17/2009 1.90E-01 3.80E-01 1.90E-01 1.90E-01 3.80E-01 12/18/2009 4.40E+00 8.80E+00 4.40E+00 4.40E+00 8.80E+00 12/19/2009 2.70E+00 5.50E+00 2.70E+00 2.70E+00 5.50E+00 12/20/2009 5.20E+00 1.00E+01 5.20E+00 5.20E+00 1.00E+01 1/5/2010 8.10E+00 8.10E+00 8.10E+00 8.10E+00 1.60E+01 1/6/2010 3.40E+00 3.40E+00 3.40E+00 3.40E+00 6.80E+00 1/7/2010 3.60E+00 3.60E+00 3.60E+00 3.60E+00 7.10E+00 1/8/2010 6.40E+00 6.40E+00 6.40E+00 6.40E+00 1.30E+01 1/9/2010 5.40E+00 5.40E+00 5.40E+00 5.40E+00 1.10E+01 1/10/2010 3.70E+00 3.70E+00 3.70E+00 3.70E+00 7.40E+00 1/11/2010 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 8.50E+00 1/12/2010 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 8.30E+00 1/13/2010 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 1.00E+01 1/14/2010 4.90E+00 4.90E+00 4.90E+00 4.90E+00 9.80E+00 1/15/2010 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 5.10E+00 1.00E+01 1/16/2010 3.30E+00 3.30E+00 3.30E+00 3.30E+00 6.70E+00 1/17/2010 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 2.20E+01 1/18/2010 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 1.10E+01 2.30E+01 1/19/2010 4.60E+00 4.60E+00 4.60E+00 4.60E+00 9.20E+00 1/20/2010 3.80E+00 3.80E+00 3.80E+00 3.80E+00 7.60E+00 1/21/2010 1.70E+00 1.70E+00 1.70E+00 1.70E+00 3.30E+00 1/22/2010 5.30E+00 5.30E+00 5.30E+00 5.30E+00 1.10E+01 P1-Ptown 12/2/2009 6.00E-02 1.10E+00 2.00E-01 6.40E+00 1.42E-01 5. 50E-02 4.73E-01 1.57E+01 7.73E-01 12/3/2009 6.00E-02 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 6.30E+00 1.40E-01 5. 50E-02 5.23E-01 1.11E+01 6.43E-01 12/4/2009 9.56E-02 1.10E+00 2.10E-01 1.74E+01 2.38E-01 7. 54E-02 6.36E-01 1.22E+01 9.66E-01 12/5/2009 4.70E-02 1.80E+00 1.60E-01 3.68E+00 2.07E-01 9. 22E-02 1.56E-01 4.80E-02 5.00E-02 12/6/2009 2.67E-01 2.75E+01 6.74E-01 3.68E+01 4.42E-01 1. 10E-01 3.95E-01 3.10E+00 4.42E+00 12/7/2009 5.52E-01 2.20E+00 9.32E-01 5.43E+01 7.56E-01 2. 13E-01 3.41E-01 2.02E+02 5.55E+00 12/8/2009 2.64E-01 2.30E+00 4.00E-01 2.10E+01 4.72E-01 1. 22E-01 6.31E-01 2.85E+01 1.16E+00 12/9/2009 3.42E-01 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 2.84E+01 6.01E-01 1. 29E-01 5.10E-01 5.80E+00 3.20E+00 12/10/2009 4.14E-01 2.30E+00 7.70E-01 3.94E+01 5.17E-01 2 .00E-01 3.89E-01 6.30E+00 5.45E+00 12/11/2009 4.82E-01 1.59E+01 1.81E+00 5.44E+01 8.29E-01 1 .30E-01 3.43E-01 1.20E+01 3.41E+00 12/12/2009 12/13/2009 4.20E-01 2.20E+00 4.00E-01 4.73E+01 5.95E-01 1 .10E-01 3.81E-01 1.30E+01 4.10E+00 12/14/2009 1.09E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 4.16E+01 9.54E-01 2 .00E-01 1.50E-01 3.10E+00 2.10E+00 12/15/2009 4.34E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 1.55E+01 9.73E-01 2 .00E-01 1.72E-01 1.20E+01 2.40E-01 12/16/2009 1.30E+00 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 3.62E+01 5.10E-01 6 .91E-02 5.02E-01 1.20E+01 3.58E+00 12/17/2009 2.93E-01 2.20E+00 2.00E-01 1.82E+01 3.60E-01 5 .30E-02 3.87E-01 1.30E+01 6.70E-01 12/18/2009 3.62E-01 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 5.17E+01 6.31E-01 1 .10E-01 3.21E-01 1.20E+01 5.32E+00 1/4/2010 6.19E-01 2.30E+00 8.60E-01 5.91E+01 9.65E-01 2.3 0E-01 5.11E-01 2.71E+01 4.71E+00 1/5/2010 8.34E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 3.79E+01 4.90E-01 2.0 0E-01 6.16E-01 3.75E+01 3.13E+00 1/6/2010 1.09E+00 2.30E+00 2.20E+00 6.57E+01 1.40E+00 5.7 0E-01 6.32E-01 1.07E+01 5.40E+00 1/7/2010 8.36E-01 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 1.66E+01 3.27E-01 1.1 0E-01 1.18E+00 8.11E+00 6.95E-01 1/8/2010 1.00E+00 2.20E+00 3.50E-01 3.75E+01 2.30E-01 9.3 0E-02 3.98E-01 7.84E+00 3.67E+00 1/9/2010 9.37E-01 2.20E+00 8.10E-01 4.47E+01 5.40E-01 2.1 0E-01 9.03E-01 2.57E+01 4.53E+00 1/10/2010 1/11/2010 1.84E+00 2.30E+00 5.41E-01 8.16E+01 1.21E+00 1. 40E-01 7.38E-01 6.10E+00 5.92E+00 1/12/2010 3.51E+00 4.64E+01 8.53E-01 4.53E+01 5.85E-01 2. 00E-01 2.71E+00 6.10E+00 1.76E+00 1/13/2010 1.06E+00 2.40E-01 2.20E-01 2.72E+01 3.16E-01 5. 90E-02 7.83E-01 6.30E-01 5.89E+00 1/14/2010 7.23E-01 2.30E+00 8.26E-01 1.79E+01 4.36E-01 1. 00E-01 6.90E-01 1.20E+01 1.97E+00 1/15/2010 7.49E-01 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 2.64E+01 7.25E-01 1. 00E-01 6.11E-01 1.20E+01 2.38E+00 1/16/2010 2.20E-01 1.40E+00 1.12E+02 9.50E-01 3.80E-01 1. 20E+01 1.95E+01



# 144

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

145

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

Facility Average of Total HAP Rank

P1-Henry 2.63E+01 1 FPC DE 2.90E+01 2 P1-Ptown 6.47E+01 3



# 146

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

147

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

GACT Limit Data New Sources

Method Method 8260B Resin Type Dispersion HAP (0=no, 1=yes) 1 Wet Resin From Stripper Bottoms Exclude Data (0=no, 1=y 0

Average of Wet Resin from Stripper Bottoms, ppm Analyte_Std

Reporting Plant Sample Date BDL (0=no, 1=yes) Acetaldehyde Acetophenon

e Cumene Ethyl Chloride Ethylene

Dichloride Ethylidene

Dichloride Formaldehy

de Methanol Methyl Chloride

P1-Ptown 12/2/2009 0 6.40E+00 1.42E-01 4.73E-01 1.57E+01 7.73E-01 1 6.00E-02 1.10E+00 2.00E-01 5.50E-02 12/2/2009 Total 6.00E-02 1.10E+00 2.00E-01 6.40E+00 1.42 E-01 5.50E-02 4.73E-01 1.57E+01 7.73E-01

12/3/2009 0 6.30E+00 5.23E-01 1.11E+01 6.43E-01

1 6.00E-02 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 1.40E-01 5.50E-02 12/3/2009 Total 6.00E-02 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 6.30E+00 1.40 E-01 5.50E-02 5.23E-01 1.11E+01 6.43E-01

12/4/2009 0 9.56E-02 1.74E+01 2.38E-01 7.54E-02 6.36E-01 1 .22E+01 9.66E-01

1 1.10E+00 2.10E-01 12/4/2009 Total 9.56E-02 1.10E+00 2.10E-01 1.74E+01 2.38 E-01 7.54E-02 6.36E-01 1.22E+01 9.66E-01

12/5/2009 0 3.68E+00 2.07E-01 9.22E-02 1.56E-01

1 4.70E-02 1.80E+00 1.60E-01 4.80E-02 5.00E-02 12/5/2009 Total 4.70E-02 1.80E+00 1.60E-01 3.68E+00 2.07 E-01 9.22E-02 1.56E-01 4.80E-02 5.00E-02

12/6/2009 0 2.67E-01 2.75E+01 6.74E-01 3.68E+01 4.42E-01 3 .95E-01 4.42E+00

1 1.10E-01 3.10E+00 12/6/2009 Total 2.67E-01 2.75E+01 6.74E-01 3.68E+01 4.42 E-01 1.10E-01 3.95E-01 3.10E+00 4.42E+00

12/7/2009 0 5.52E-01 9.32E-01 5.43E+01 7.56E-01 2.13E-01 3 .41E-01 2.02E+02 5.55E+00

1 2.20E+00 12/7/2009 Total 5.52E-01 2.20E+00 9.32E-01 5.43E+01 7.56 E-01 2.13E-01 3.41E-01 2.02E+02 5.55E+00

12/8/2009 0 2.64E-01 2.10E+01 4.72E-01 1.22E-01 6.31E-01 2 .85E+01 1.16E+00

1 2.30E+00 4.00E-01 12/8/2009 Total 2.64E-01 2.30E+00 4.00E-01 2.10E+01 4.72E-01 1.22E-01 6.31E-01 2.85E+01 1.16E+00

12/9/2009 0 3.42E-01 2.84E+01 6.01E-01 1.29E-01 5.10E-01 3 .20E+00

1 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 5.80E+00 12/9/2009 Total 3.42E-01 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 2.84E+01 6.01 E-01 1.29E-01 5.10E-01 5.80E+00 3.20E+00 12/10/2009 0 4.14E-01 3.94E+01 5.17E-01 3.89E-01 5.45E+00 1 2.30E+00 7.70E-01 2.00E-01 6.30E+00 12/10/2009 Total 4.14E-01 2.30E+00 7.70E-01 3.94E+01 5.1 7E-01 2.00E-01 3.89E-01 6.30E+00 5.45E+00 12/11/2009 0 4.82E-01 1.59E+01 1.81E+00 5.44E+01 8.29E-01 1.30E-01 3.43E-01 3.41E+00 1 1.20E+01 12/11/2009 Total 4.82E-01 1.59E+01 1.81E+00 5.44E+01 8.2 9E-01 1.30E-01 3.43E-01 1.20E+01 3.41E+00 12/12/2009 0 12/12/2009 Total 12/13/2009 0 4.20E-01 4.73E+01 5.95E-01 3.81E-01 4.10E+00 1 2.20E+00 4.00E-01 1.10E-01 1.30E+01 12/13/2009 Total 4.20E-01 2.20E+00 4.00E-01 4.73E+01 5.9 5E-01 1.10E-01 3.81E-01 1.30E+01 4.10E+00 12/14/2009 0 1.09E-01 4.16E+01 9.54E-01 2.10E+00 1 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 2.00E-01 1.50E-01 3.10E+00 12/14/2009 Total 1.09E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 4.16E+01 9.5 4E-01 2.00E-01 1.50E-01 3.10E+00 2.10E+00 12/15/2009 0 4.34E-01 1.55E+01 9.73E-01 1.72E-01 1 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 2.00E-01 1.20E+01 2.40E-01 12/15/2009 Total 4.34E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 1.55E+01 9.7 3E-01 2.00E-01 1.72E-01 1.20E+01 2.40E-01 12/16/2009 0 1.30E+00 3.62E+01 5.10E-01 6.91E-02 5.02E-01 3.58E+00 1 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 1.20E+01 12/16/2009 Total 1.30E+00 2.30E+00 2.10E-01 3.62E+01 5.1 0E-01 6.91E-02 5.02E-01 1.20E+01 3.58E+00 12/17/2009 0 2.93E-01 1.82E+01 3.60E-01 3.87E-01 6.70E-01 1 2.20E+00 2.00E-01 5.30E-02 1.30E+01 12/17/2009 Total 2.93E-01 2.20E+00 2.00E-01 1.82E+01 3.6 0E-01 5.30E-02 3.87E-01 1.30E+01 6.70E-01 12/18/2009 0 3.62E-01 5.17E+01 6.31E-01 3.21E-01 5.32E+00 1 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 1.10E-01 1.20E+01 12/18/2009 Total 3.62E-01 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 5.17E+01 6.3 1E-01 1.10E-01 3.21E-01 1.20E+01 5.32E+00

1/4/2010 0 6.19E-01 5.91E+01 9.65E-01 5.11E-01 2.71E+01 4. 71E+00

1 2.30E+00 8.60E-01 2.30E-01 1/4/2010 Total 6.19E-01 2.30E+00 8.60E-01 5.91E+01 9.65E -01 2.30E-01 5.11E-01 2.71E+01 4.71E+00

1/5/2010 0 8.34E-01 3.79E+01 6.16E-01 3.75E+01 3.13E+00

1 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 4.90E-01 2.00E-01 1/5/2010 Total 8.34E-01 2.30E+00 7.40E-01 3.79E+01 4.90E -01 2.00E-01 6.16E-01 3.75E+01 3.13E+00

1/6/2010 0 1.09E+00 6.57E+01 6.32E-01 1.07E+01 5.40E+00

1 2.30E+00 2.20E+00 1.40E+00 5.70E-01 1/6/2010 Total 1.09E+00 2.30E+00 2.20E+00 6.57E+01 1.40E +00 5.70E-01 6.32E-01 1.07E+01 5.40E+00

1/7/2010 0 8.36E-01 1.66E+01 3.27E-01 1.18E+00 8.11E+00 6. 95E-01

1 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 1.10E-01 1/7/2010 Total 8.36E-01 2.30E+00 4.10E-01 1.66E+01 3.27E -01 1.10E-01 1.18E+00 8.11E+00 6.95E-01

1/8/2010 0 1.00E+00 3.75E+01 3.98E-01 7.84E+00 3.67E+00

1 2.20E+00 3.50E-01 2.30E-01 9.30E-02 1/8/2010 Total 1.00E+00 2.20E+00 3.50E-01 3.75E+01 2.30E -01 9.30E-02 3.98E-01 7.84E+00 3.67E+00

1/9/2010 0 9.37E-01 4.47E+01 9.03E-01 2.57E+01 4.53E+00

1 2.20E+00 8.10E-01 5.40E-01 2.10E-01 1/9/2010 Total 9.37E-01 2.20E+00 8.10E-01 4.47E+01 5.40E -01 2.10E-01 9.03E-01 2.57E+01 4.53E+00

1/10/2010 0 1/10/2010 Total

1/11/2010 0 1.84E+00 5.41E-01 8.16E+01 1.21E+00 7.38E-01 5 .92E+00

1 2.30E+00 1.40E-01 6.10E+00 1/11/2010 Total 1.84E+00 2.30E+00 5.41E-01 8.16E+01 1.21 E+00 1.40E-01 7.38E-01 6.10E+00 5.92E+00

1/12/2010 0 3.51E+00 4.64E+01 8.53E-01 4.53E+01 5.85E-01 2 .71E+00 1.76E+00

1 2.00E-01 6.10E+00 1/12/2010 Total 3.51E+00 4.64E+01 8.53E-01 4.53E+01 5.85 E-01 2.00E-01 2.71E+00 6.10E+00 1.76E+00

1/13/2010 0 1.06E+00 2.72E+01 3.16E-01 7.83E-01 5.89E+00

1 2.40E-01 2.20E-01 5.90E-02 6.30E-01 1/13/2010 Total 1.06E+00 2.40E-01 2.20E-01 2.72E+01 3.16 E-01 5.90E-02 7.83E-01 6.30E-01 5.89E+00

1/14/2010 0 7.23E-01 8.26E-01 1.79E+01 4.36E-01 6.90E-01 1 .97E+00

1 2.30E+00 1.00E-01 1.20E+01 1/14/2010 Total 7.23E-01 2.30E+00 8.26E-01 1.79E+01 4.36 E-01 1.00E-01 6.90E-01 1.20E+01 1.97E+00

1/15/2010 0 7.49E-01 2.64E+01 7.25E-01 6.11E-01 2.38E+00

1 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 1.00E-01 1.20E+01 1/15/2010 Total 7.49E-01 2.30E+00 3.70E-01 2.64E+01 7.25 E-01 1.00E-01 6.11E-01 1.20E+01 2.38E+00

1/16/2010 0 1.12E+02 1.95E+01



# 148

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

1 2.20E-01 1.40E+00 9.50E-01 3.80E-01 1.20E+01 1/16/2010 Total 2.20E-01 1.40E+00 1.12E+02 9.50E-01 3.80E-01 1.20E+01 1.9 5E+01



# 149

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

Detection Limit Analysis

Facility HAP Sum Daily HAP Sum ln Total

HAP

P1-Ptown 2.35E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.42E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.49E+01 2.49E+01 3.21E+00 P1-Ptown 1.86E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.77E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.13E+01 2.13E+01 3.06E+00 P1-Ptown 3.16E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.31E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.29E+01 3.29E+01 3.49E+00 P1-Ptown 4.14E+00 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.11E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 6.24E+00 6.24E+00 1.83E+00 P1-Ptown 7.05E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.21E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 7.37E+01 7.37E+01 4.30E+00 P1-Ptown 2.65E+02 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.20E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.67E+02 2.67E+02 5.59E+00 P1-Ptown 5.21E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.70E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 5.48E+01 5.48E+01 4.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.32E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 8.47E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 4.17E+01 4.17E+01 3.73E+00 P1-Ptown 4.62E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 9.57E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 5.57E+01 5.57E+01 4.02E+00 P1-Ptown 7.73E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.20E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 8.93E+01 8.93E+01 4.49E+00 P1-Ptown 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 5.28E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.57E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 6.85E+01 6.85E+01 4.23E+00 P1-Ptown 4.48E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 6.49E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 5.13E+01 5.13E+01 3.94E+00 P1-Ptown 1.71E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.55E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.26E+01 3.26E+01 3.48E+00 P1-Ptown 4.22E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.45E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 5.67E+01 5.67E+01 4.04E+00 P1-Ptown 1.99E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.55E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.54E+01 3.54E+01 3.57E+00 P1-Ptown 5.83E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.48E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 7.32E+01 7.32E+01 4.29E+00 P1-Ptown 9.30E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.39E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 9.64E+01 9.64E+01 4.57E+00 P1-Ptown 8.00E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.73E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 8.37E+01 8.37E+01 4.43E+00 P1-Ptown 8.35E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 6.47E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 9.00E+01 9.00E+01 4.50E+00 P1-Ptown 2.77E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.82E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.06E+01 3.06E+01 3.42E+00 P1-Ptown 5.04E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 2.87E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 5.33E+01 5.33E+01 3.98E+00 P1-Ptown 7.68E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.76E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 8.05E+01 8.05E+01 4.39E+00 P1-Ptown 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 9.18E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 8.54E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.00E+02 1.00E+02 4.61E+00 P1-Ptown 1.01E+02 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 6.30E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.07E+02 1.07E+02 4.68E+00 P1-Ptown 3.52E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.15E+00 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.64E+01 3.64E+01 3.59E+00 P1-Ptown 2.25E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.44E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 3.69E+01 3.69E+01 3.61E+00 P1-Ptown 3.09E+01 0.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.48E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 4.56E+01 4.56E+01 3.82E+00 P1-Ptown 1.32E+02 0.00E+00



# 150

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

P1-Ptown 1.50E+01 1.00E+00 P1-Ptown 1.46E+02 1.46E+02 4.99E+00



# 151

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Resins - Dispersion - Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

GACT Limit and Variability Calculation New Sources

Total Non-VC HAP PL 

## 

Normal Lognormal

n 2.80E+01 2.80E+01

m 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 Average 6.76E+01 3.99E+00 Median 5.53E+01 4.01E+00 Standard Deviation 5.00E+01 7.04E-01 Minimum 6.24E+00 1.83E+00 Maximum 2.67E+02 5.59E+00 Skewness 2.52E+00 -6.73E-01 SE Skewness 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 Skewness Test Non-normal Normal Kurtosis 8.89E+00 2.56E+00 SE Kurtosis 9.26E-01 9.26E-01 Kurtosis Test Non-normal Non-normal t-statistic for UPL 2.47E+00 2.47E+00 UPL 1.93E+02 3.19E+02

Average for variability analysis 6.76E+01 Max DL < or = avg 4.75E+00 3x Max DL 1.43E+01 UPL 3.19E+02 ppmw GACT Floor 3.19E+02 ppmw

1) if the 3x RDL value is less than or equal to the calcu lated floor or emissions limit, use the calculated floor or emissions limit value for the rule making. 2) if the 3x RDL value is greater than the calculated f loor or emissions limit, use the 3x RDL value as the floo r or emissions limit adjusted for measurement variabilit y for the rule making



# 152

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

153

# 	






Resin Sampling and Monitoring

Low High Average Cost of US EPA Method 8260B [1] $201 $400 $301

Initial Compliance

3 outlet tests x 2 strippers 2 

# $1,803.00

Total Compliance Cost $1,803.00

CRF (20 yr, 7%): (0.07*(1+0.07)^20)/((1+0.07)^20-1) 0.09439



# Annual Cost of Initial Compliance `= (3 inlet tests*Avg Cost*2 Strippers)*CRF $170.19

Monitoring

1 tests per month for each type of resin x 2 strippers 2 

# $601.00

Certain Teed Lake Charles B 1 $7,212.00 Certain Teed Lake Charles B 1 $7,212.00

2. Average number of strippers calculated from facility su bmitted survey data 1. National Environmental Methods Index Website https://www.nemi.gov/apex/f?p=237:38:951365369293524: :::P38_METHOD_ID:7041

Company Location Resin Type Number of Resin Types TAC of

Resin Testing

154

# ATTACHMENT D- RESINS ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# 	




**
	

**



**

 

	 


	** **!

" 


	** 

**!

" #$%&'	**  **
 
	!#$(&** **

" 
** 

 	

 	

 	

 	

 	

 	



      

      



**

 

	 


	** **!

" 


	** 

**!

" #$%&'	**  **
 
	!#$(&** **

" 
** 

 	

 	

 	

 	

 	

 	



      

      

      

      

 
!"#       $"      

**)*

!"** **+,%+&-#** **)*
.).&
/*
!"** **0,012--**

155

# Attachment E

GACT Analysis for Process and Maintenance Wastewater

156

# ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS

02/09/2012



# 	


Calculated GACT Baseline

Calculated Limits Existing Area Source Current Level of Performance (Least Controlled, Avg Concentrations) Existing Area Source

Current Level of Control (Least Controlled, Variability Included) New Area Source Current

level of Performance New Area Source Current

level of Control

Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.10E+00 4.00E-01 2.10E+00 Total Non-VC HAP (ppmw) 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 1.80E-02



# Existing and New Source GACT Summary for Wastewater (Option 2)

Pollutant Existing Area Source Current Level of Performance (Least Controlled, Avg Concentrations) Major Existing Source Requirements Emissions for Current Level

of Control Emissions Reductions as a

Result of Complaince with Major Existing Source Requirements (tons/yr)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) 4.00E-01 6.80E+00 9.03E-01 - Total Non-VC HAP (ppmw) 1.80E-02 1.10E+02 1.31E+01



# -

Existing Source GACT Summary for Wastewater (Option 3)

Pollutant Existing Area Source Current Level of Performance (Least Controlled, Avg Concentrations) Major New Source Requirement Emissions for Current Level

of Control Emissions Reductions as a

Result of Complaince with Major New Source Requirements (tons/yr)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.80E-01 9.03E-01 8.55E-03 Total Non-VC HAP (ppmw) 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 1.31E+01 1.22E+01



# New Source GACT Summary for Wastewater (Option 3) (Based on OxyVinyls Dee r Park)

Pollutant New Area Source Current Level of Performance (Least Controlled, Avg Concentrations) Major New Source Requirement Emissions for Current Level

of Control Emissions Reductions as a

Result of Complaince with Major New Source Requirements (tons/yr)

Vinyl Chloride (ppmw) 4.00E-01 2.80E-01 6.34E-01 1.31E-01 Total Non-VC HAP (ppmw) 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 9.44E+00 8.91E+00



# GACT Analysis - Wastewater - Existing and New - Area Source - Costs to Meet N EW MACT Floor

Cost Component CTLC OVDP Model New Facility (Based on OxyVinyls Deer Park)



# Initial Costs Control Equipment Capital Cost Hard Pipe / Pump / Motor for Uncontrolled Stream 150155.34 234074.35 234074.35 New Wastewater Stripper 4162340.18 7816537.83 7816537.83 Initial Wastewater Testing 981.00 981.00 981.00 Initial Record Keeping and Reporting Cost 2733.51 2733.51 2733.51

Total Initial Costs 4316210.02 8054326.70 8054326.70

Annual Costs Annualized Capital Cost Hard Pip / Pump / Motor for Uncontrolled Stream 14168.30 22084.61 22084.61 New Wastewater Stripper 392895.47 737825.88 737825.88 Annual Hardpipe/Pump/Motor Equipment Cost 13975.96 16462.59 13975.96 Annual Wastewater Stripper Cost 574607.30 1204593.50 1204593.50 Annualized Initial Testing and Monitoring Cost 1 

# 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual Testing and Monitoring Cost 6376.50 6376.50 6376.50 Annual Record Keeping and Reporting Cost 3511.84 3511.84 3511.84

Total Annual Cost 1005535.37 1990854.91 1988368.29 1 - Initial Testing Cost less than annual; therefore, no amortization of initial te sting cost



# 157

# 	






Wastewater - New and Existing Area Sources - VC


	

**	
	
 **  ****

Averages based on Daily Averages 

##  ! " **		

**  #$%  &' &  Normal LN



## ()*+ ,	- ./0	 .112 Sample Size 1.20E+01 1.20E+01



## 34	- .-1	 ./2 Compliance Avg Period 1.00E+00 1.00E+00



## 	- .56	 .2 Average 3.99E-01 -1.19E+00 

## $	- 5.-	 6.15	 Median 2.89E-01 -1.24E+00 

## %	- .0	 .2 Standard Deviation 4.16E-01 6.77E-01



## ,7	- .	 .02 Minimum 1.20E-01 -2.12E+00



## ,7	- 1.1-	 .2 Maximum 1.67E+00 5.14E-01 

## 7	- 1.0	 ./2 Skewness 3.05E+00 1.32E+00 

## $	- ./62 0.5	 SE Skewness 7.07E-01 7.07E-01



## ("&	- .	 .//2 Skewness Test Non-normal Normal



##  	- .	 .2 Kurtosis 9.92E+00 3.17E+00



## *"	- 5.0-	 6.-	 SE Kurtosis 1.41E+00 1.41E+00

Kurtosis Test Non-normal Non-normal

99.0% t-statistic for UPL 2.72E+00 2.72E+00

99.0% UPL 1.57E+00 2.07E+00

average in variability analysis 3.99E-01 Max DL < or = avg 1.00E-02

3x Max DL 3.00E-02

99.0% UPL 2.07E+00 ppm

MACT Floor Limit 2.10E+00 

### ppm 1) if the 3x RDL value is less than or equal to the calculated floor or emissions limit, use the calculated floor or emissi ons limit value

2) if the 3x RDL value is greater than the calculat ed floor or emissions limit, use the 3x RDL value as the floor or emissio ns limit adjusted for measurement variability



# 158

# 	






Wastewater - New and Existing Area Sources - Total Non-VC HAP

MACT Floor Data Set Company & Facility Originating Equipment Acetaldehyd e EDC MeOH MIBK Total Non-VC HAP Rank OxyVinyls Deer Park Waste Water Stripper 1.80E-02 1.80E-02 1 Formosa Baton Rouge Wastewater Stripping Columns 3.00 E-01 3.00E-01 2 Westlake Calvert City Water Stripper Col Feed Heat E xch 2.26E+00 2.26E+00 3 Shintech Freeport HEAT EXCHANGER 3.90E+01 2.59E-01 3.93E+01 4 Shintech Addis Waste Water Stripper 4.00E+01 2.60E-01 4.03E+01 5 Shintech Plaquemine Waste Water Stripper 4.00E+01 3.00E-01 4.03E+01 6 Note: CTLC did not provide any WW concentration dat a other than VC for Stripper Outlet



# 159	


Wastewater - Existing Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping/Stripper CostsOption 2 Analysis for New and Existing Area SourcesPollutantExisting Source (ppmw)New Source (ppmw)VC6.80E+002.80E-01Total Non_VC HAP1.10E+021.80E-02Stripper Outlet Wastewater Baseline EstimationCompany & Facility Resin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Stripper WW(Gal)2008 Stripper Outlet(Gals)/Lb of Resin2008 Stripper Outlet(Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)% Reduction of VCConc Needed to meetNew Source MACTfloor limitTotal Non-VCHAP Conc W/Avg for Non-Report (PMW)% Reduction ofTotal Non-VCHAP ConcNeeded to meetMACT floor limitBaseline VC(Tons/YR)BaselineTotal Non-VCHAP(Tons/YR)VC Reduction(Tons PerYear)Total Non-VC HAPReduction(Tons/yr)Certain Teed Lake Charles BulkNo 8.05E-06 	 	 	6.01E-06 2.70E-07 1.80E-06 0.00E+00Dow Midland OtherNoFormosa Baton Rouge OtherYes Formosa Delaware Dispersion YesFormosa Point Comfort OtherYesOxyVinyls Deer Park OtherYes 	 	 	2.87E-02 1.30E-03 8.55E-03 0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena OtherYes OxyVinyls Pedricktown OtherPolyOne Henry Other/DispersionNo 6.52E-02PolyOne Pedricktown DispersionNo 6.21E-03Shintech Addis OtherYes Shintech Freeport OtherYes Shintech Plaquemine OtherYes Westlake Calvert City OtherNo 2.63E-02Westlake Geismar OtherNo 2.78E-02Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other Georgia Gulf Plaquemine OtherAverage*3.14E-02*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20UNCONTROLLED WASTEWATER STREAMSin Bulk processWastewater Stripper Outlet Concentration Limits (Monthly Basis)



# 160	


Wastewater - Existing Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping/Stripper CostsUnControlled DataDataFacilityName Sum of Total WW (GAL) Sum of VC2 Sum of Total Non-VC HAP2Formosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge3.42E+081.43E-01Georgia Gulf Chemicals Aberdeen Facility2.77E+070.00E+00Lake Charles Polymer Plant5.96E+076.22E-04OxyVinyls Deer Park0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena4.62E+080.00E+001.44E+00PolyOne Henry4.13E+073.44E-01Shintech Addis5.11E+077.94E-032.49E+00Shintech Freeport2.70E+076.76E-044.42E+00Shintech Plaquemine1.00E+072.80E-036.20E-01Westlake Calvert City6.46E+070.00E+006.10E-01Westlake Geismar1.11E+086.67E-03Company & FacilityTotal WW (GAL)Tons VCTons Total Non-VC HAPVC Conc (PPMW)Total Non-VC HAP Conc (PPMW)Formosa Baton Rouge3.42E+081.43E-011.00E-01Georgia Gulf Aberdeen2.77E+070.00E+000.00E+00Certain Teed Lake Charles5.96E+076.22E-042.50E-03OxyVinyls Deer Park0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena4.62E+080.00E+001.44E+000.00E+007.47E-01PolyOne Henry4.13E+073.44E-012.00E+00Shintech Addis5.11E+077.94E-032.49E+003.72E-021.17E+01Shintech Freeport2.70E+076.76E-044.42E+006.00E-033.93E+01Shintech Plaquemine1.00E+072.80E-036.20E-016.69E-021.48E+01Westlake Calvert City6.46E+070.00E+006.10E-010.00E+002.26E+00Westlake Geismar1.11E+086.67E-031.45E-02Average2.23E-011.38E+01Company & Facility Resin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 UncontrolledWW (Gal)2008 UncontrolledFlow (Gals/Lb ofResin2008 UncontrolledFlow (Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)Total Non-VC HAPConc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PMW)Baseline VC(Tons/YR)Baseline TotalNon-VC HAP(Tons/YR)	



VCReductions(tpy)Non-VCHAPReductions(tpy)Certain Teed Lake Charles BulkNo 1.33E-012.50E-03 1.38E+01 6.22E-04 3.42E+00 1.50E+05 1.40E+04 1.42E+04 0.00E+00 3.42E+00Dow Midland OtherNoFormosa Baton Rouge OtherYes  Formosa Delaware Dispersion YesFormosa Point Comfort OtherYesOxyVinyls Deer Park OtherYes2.50E-03 1.38E+01 1.60E-03 8.79E+00 2.34E+05 1.65E+04 2.21E+04 0.00E+00 8.78E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena OtherYes  OxyVinyls Pedricktown OtherPolyOne Henry Other/DispersionNo 5.43E-01PolyOne Pedricktown DispersionNoShintech Addis OtherYes  Shintech Freeport OtherYes  Shintech Plaquemine OtherYes  Westlake Calvert City OtherNo 5.88E-02Westlake Geismar OtherNo 2.32E-01Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other  Georgia Gulf Plaquemine OtherAverage*2.78E-01*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20in Bulk process(see "Hardpipe Costing" sheet)



# 161	


Wastewater - Existing Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping/Stripper CostsMAINTENANCE WW STREAMSCompany & Facility Total WW (GAL)VC Conc(PPMW)Total Non-VC HAP Conc(PPMW)PolyOne Henry2.22E+072.00E+00Shintech Freeport4.30E+057.70E-02Westlake Calvert City1.21E+06Westlake Geismar8.52E+052.25E+002.13E+007.70E-02Company & Facility Resin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Main WW (Gal)2008 Maint Flow(Gals/Lb of Resin2008 Maint Flow(Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)TOHAP Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report (PMW)Baseline VC(Tons/YR)BaselineTOHAP(Tons/YR)Certain Teed Lake Charles BulkNo2.13E+00 7.70E-02 3.91E-01 1.42E-02Dow Midland OtherNoFormosa Baton Rouge OtherYesFormosa Delaware Dispersion YesFormosa Point Comfort OtherYesOxyVinyls Deer Park OtherYes2.13E+00 7.70E-02 4.81E-01 1.74E-02OxyVinyls Pasadena OtherYesOxyVinyls Pedricktown OtherPolyOne Henry Other/DispersionNo2.22E+072.93E-01PolyOne Pedricktown DispersionNoShintech Addis OtherYesShintech Freeport OtherYes4.30E+05Shintech Plaquemine OtherYesWestlake Calvert City OtherNo1.21E+061.10E-03Westlake Geismar OtherNo8.52E+051.79E-03Georgia Gulf Aberdeen OtherGeorgia Gulf Plaquemine OtherAverage*9.85E-02*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20in Bulk processStripper Outlet, Uncontrolled, and Maint. Wastewater CombinedCompany & Facility Resin TypeBaseline VC(Tons/YR)Baseline Total Non-VC HAP(Tons/YR)VC Reduction (TonsPer Year)Total Non-VC HAP Reduction(Tons Per Year)Certain Teed - Lake CharlesBulk3.91E-013.44E+001.80E-063.42E+00OxyVinyls Deer ParkSuspension5.12E-018.81E+008.55E-038.78E+00



# 162ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS02/09/2012Wastewater - New Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping CostsOption 2 Analysis for New and Existing Area SourcesPollutantExisting Source (ppmw)New Source (ppmw)VC6.80E+002.80E-01Total Non_VC HAP110.000.018Stripper Outlet Wastewater Baseline EstimationCompany & Facility Resin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Stripper WW(Gal)2008 Stripper Outlet(Gals)/Lb of Resin2008 Stripper Outlet(Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)% Reduction of VCConc Needed to meetMACT floor limitTotal Non-VCHAP Conc W/Avg for Non-Report (PMW)% Reduction ofTotal Non-VCHAP ConcNeeded to meetMACT floor limitBaseline VC(Tons/YR)BaselineTotal Non-VCHAP(Tons/YR)VC Reduction(Tons PerYear)Total Non-VC HAPReduction(Tons/yr)Certain Teed Lake Charles BulkNo 	8.05E-06Dow Midland Other
NoFormosa Baton Rouge OtherYes 	Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes	Formosa Point Comfort OtherYes
OxyVinyls Deer Park OtherYes
	    1.51E-01 1.30E-03 1.31E-01 0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena OtherYes 
OxyVinyls Pedricktown Other
PolyOne Henry Other/DispersionNo
 
6.52E-02PolyOne Pedricktown DispersionNo	 6.21E-03Shintech Addis OtherYes Shintech Freeport OtherYes Shintech Plaquemine OtherYes	 	Westlake Calvert City OtherNo 2.63E-02Westlake Geismar Other
No	 	2.78E-02Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other 
Georgia Gulf Plaquemine OtherAverage*3.14E-02*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20UNCONTROLLED WASTEWATER STREAMSin Bulk processWastewater Stripper Outlet Concentration Limits (Monthly Basis)



# 163ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS02/09/2012Wastewater - New Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping CostsUnControlled DataDataFacilityName Sum of Total WW (GAL) Sum of VC2 Sum of Total Non-VC HAP2Formosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge3.42E+081.43E-01Georgia Gulf Chemicals Aberdeen Facility2.77E+070.00E+00Lake Charles Polymer Plant5.96E+076.22E-04OxyVinyls Deer Park0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena4.62E+080.00E+001.44E+00PolyOne Henry4.13E+073.44E-01Shintech Addis5.11E+077.94E-032.49E+00Shintech Freeport2.70E+076.76E-044.42E+00Shintech Plaquemine1.00E+072.80E-036.20E-01Westlake Calvert City6.46E+070.00E+006.10E-01Westlake Geismar1.11E+086.67E-03Company & FacilityTotal WW (GAL)Tons VCTons Total Non-VC HAPVC Conc (PPMW)Total Non-VC HAP Conc (PPMW)Formosa Baton Rouge3.42E+081.43E-011.00E-01Georgia Gulf Aberdeen2.77E+070.00E+000.00E+00Certain Teed Lake Charles5.96E+076.22E-042.50E-03OxyVinyls Deer Park0.00E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena4.62E+080.00E+001.44E+000.00E+007.47E-01PolyOne Henry4.13E+073.44E-012.00E+00Shintech Addis5.11E+077.94E-032.49E+003.72E-021.17E+01Shintech Freeport2.70E+076.76E-044.42E+006.00E-033.93E+01Shintech Plaquemine1.00E+072.80E-036.20E-016.69E-021.48E+01Westlake Calvert City6.46E+070.00E+006.10E-010.00E+002.26E+00Westlake Geismar1.11E+086.67E-031.45E-02Average2.23E-011.38E+01Company & Facility Resin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 UncontrolledWW (Gal)2008 UncontrolledFlow (Gals/Lb ofResin2008 UncontrolledFlow (Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)Total Non-VC HAPConc W/ Avg for Non-Report (PMW)Baseline VC(Tons/YR)Baseline TotalNon-VC HAP(Tons/YR)	



VCReductions(tpy)Non-VCHAPReductions(tpy)Certain Teed Lake Charles BulkNo 

1.33E-01
Dow Midland Other
NoFormosa Baton Rouge OtherYes 	 	Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes	Formosa Point Comfort OtherYes
	
OxyVinyls Deer Park OtherYes

	2.50E-03 1.38E+01 1.60E-03 8.79E+00 2.34E+05 1.65E+04 2.21E+04 0.00E+00 8.78E+00OxyVinyls Pasadena OtherYes  OxyVinyls Pedricktown Other
PolyOne Henry Other/DispersionNo
 	5.43E-01	PolyOne Pedricktown DispersionNo	Shintech Addis OtherYes 
 
Shintech Freeport OtherYes  Shintech Plaquemine OtherYes	  Westlake Calvert City OtherNo 

5.88E-02
Westlake Geismar Other
No	 2.32E-01Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other  Georgia Gulf Plaquemine Other		Average*2.78E-01*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20in Bulk process(see "Hardpipe Costing" sheet)



# 164ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS02/09/2012Wastewater - New Area Sources - Baseline & Reductions & Hardpiping CostsMAINTENANCE WW STREAMSCompany & Facility Total WW (GAL)VC Conc(PPMW)Total Non-VC HAP Conc(PPMW)PolyOne Henry2.22E+072.00E+00Shintech Freeport4.30E+057.70E-02Westlake Calvert City1.21E+06Westlake Geismar8.52E+052.25E+002.13E+007.70E-02Company & Facility Resin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Main WW (Gal)2008 Maint Flow(Gals/Lb of Resin2008 Maint Flow(Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)TOHAP Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report (PMW)Baseline VC(Tons/YR)BaselineTOHAP(Tons/YR)Certain Teed Lake Charles BulkNoDow Midland Other
No	Formosa Baton Rouge OtherYes	Formosa Delaware Dispersion Yes	Formosa Point Comfort OtherYes

OxyVinyls Deer Park OtherYes
	2.13E+00 7.70E-02 4.81E-01 1.74E-02OxyVinyls Pasadena OtherYesOxyVinyls Pedricktown Other

PolyOne Henry Other/DispersionNo
2.22E+072.93E-01PolyOne Pedricktown DispersionNo	Shintech Addis OtherYes
Shintech Freeport OtherYes4.30E+05	Shintech Plaquemine OtherYes	Westlake Calvert City OtherNo1.21E+061.10E-03Westlake Geismar Other
No	8.52E+051.79E-03
Georgia Gulf Aberdeen Other
Georgia Gulf Plaquemine OtherAverage*9.85E-02*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20in Bulk processStripper Outlet, Uncontrolled, and Maint. Wastewater CombinedCompany & Facility Resin TypeBaseline VC(Tons/YR)Baseline Total Non-VC HAP(Tons/YR)VC Reduction (TonsPer Year)Total Non-VC HAP Reduction(Tons Per Year)OxyVinyls Deer ParkSuspension6.34E-018.81E+001.31E-018.78E+00



# 165ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS02/09/2012Wastewater - Steam Stripper CostingSteam Stripper - PVC Resin - Cost Analysis - VC andTOHCompanyWestlake ChemicalCorporationCertain TeedLake CharlesCertain TeedLake CharlesFacilityWestlake GeismarProcess TypeSuspensionBulkBulkProcess Type StdSuspensionBulkBulkProcess Unit IDP-1Stripped Resin Stream IDS-1Stripping TypeContinuousContinuousContinuousAnnual Production476,390,000447,348,640551,155,000Inlet Stream Flow, liters/min19300.02704130For CTLC and Model - sum of stripper outlet and uncontrolled streamsA. Parameters(Inputs and Example Calculation)1. Stripper inlet flow rate,pm (Q)500193001302. Annual operating hours, hr/yr (H)84008400840084003. Steam to Feed Ratio, kg /(S)0.0960.0600.0600.0604. Electricity use, kWhr/day (EU)2602602602605. Operating labor rate, $/hr (LR) [2]$34.60$34.60$34.60$34.606. Electricity cost, $/kWh (EC) [3]$0.07$0.07$0.07$0.077. Water cost, $/1,000 gal (WC) [4]$0.20$0.20$0.20$0.208. Steam cost, $/1,000 lb (SC) [4]$4.65$4.65$4.65$4.659. Capital recovery factor= [i x (1 + i)a] / [(1 + i)a- 1], where i = interest rate, a = equipment lifea. Equipment CRF, 20-yr life, 7% interest0.094390.09439 0.09439 0.0943910. Cost indexa. 2010641.1641.1641.1641.1b. 1989356.0356.0356.0356.0B. Total Capital Investment1. $= 0.3731 x Q^0.267 x 10^6$0estimated total capital provided by facility2. $ /pm= $ / Q$0C. Direct Annual Operating Costs, $/yr1. Electricity= EU / (24 hr/day) x H x EC$6,079$6,079$6,079$6,0792. Steam= Q x S x (2.2 lb/kg) x (60 min/hr) x H x SC / 1000$247,484$596,994$8$40,1543. Water = Q x (5220 liters water-min / liters feed-day) x (1 day / 24 hr) x H x (0.264 gal/liter) xWC / 1000$0$186,159 $3 $12,5214. Operating labor= (1 hr/shift) x (1 shift/8 hr) x H x LR$36,330$0$0$05. Supervisory labor= 0.15 x (operating labor)$5,450$0$0$06. Maintenance labor= (0.5 hr/shift) x (1 shift/8 hr) x H x (LR x 1.1)$19,982$0$0$07. Maintenance materials= 0.02 x TCI$0$0$0$0D. Indirect Annual Costs, $/yr1. Overhead= 0.6 x (labor + maintenance materials)$37,057$0$0$02. Property taxes, insurance, andadministration= 0.04 x TCI$0$0 $0 $03. Capital recovery= Equipment CRF x TCI$0$0$0$0F. Include in Annual Cost?yesyesyesF. Total Annual Cost1. $/yr= Direct Annual Costs + Indirect Annual Costs - Recovery Credit$352,381$789,232$6,090$58,754Sources:1. Cost equations: HON BID, Vol 1-b and 1-c, Nov 1992 (EPA-453/D-92-016c)2. Operating labor rate: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics, May 2008 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment andWage Estimates3. Electricity cost: Energy Information Administration. Average Industrial Retail Price of Electricity: October 2009.4. Water cost and steam cost: Air Compliance Advisor,version 7.5.5. ICIS, http://www.icis.com/v2/chemicals/9076567/vinyl-chloride/pricing.html, October 20, 2010. (Avg. $690/tonne = $0.313/lb)Parameters/CostsEquation



# 166ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS02/09/2012Wastewater - Steam Stripper CostingSteam Stripper - PVC Resin - Cost Analysis - VC andTOHCompanyWestlake ChemicalCorporationCertain TeedLake CharlesOxyVinyls DeerParkFacilityWestlake GeismarProcess TypeSuspensionBulkSuspensionProcess Type StdSuspensionBulkSuspensionProcess Unit IDP-1Stripped Resin Stream IDS-1Stripping TypeContinuousContinuousContinuousAnnual Production476,390,000447,348,640551,155,000Inlet Stream Flow, liters/min19304481280A. Parameters(Inputs and Example Calculation)1. Stripper inlet flow rate,pm (Q)500193044812802. Annual operating hours, hr/yr (H)84008400840084003. Steam to Feed Ratio, kg /(S)0.0960.0600.0600.0604. Electricity use, kWhr/day (EU)2602602602605. Operating labor rate, $/hr (LR) [2]$34.60$34.60$34.60$34.606. Electricity cost, $/kWh (EC) [3]$0.07$0.07$0.07$0.077. Water cost, $/1,000 gal (WC) [4]$0.20$0.20$0.20$0.208. Steam cost, $/1,000 lb (SC) [4]$4.65$4.65$4.65$4.659. Capital recovery factor= [i x (1 + i)a] / [(1 + i)a- 1], where i = interest rate, a = equipment lifea. Equipment CRF, 20-yr life, 7% interest0.094390.09439 0.09439 0.0943910. Cost indexa. 2010641.1641.1641.1641.1b. 1989356.0356.0356.0356.0B. Total Capital Investment1. $= 0.3731 x Q^0.267 x 10^6$0$10,000,000$4,162,340$7,816,5382. $ /pm= $ / Q$0$5,182$9,295$6,107C. Direct Annual Operating Costs, $/yr1. Electricity= EU / (24 hr/day) x H x EC$6,079$0$0$02. Steam= Q x S x (2.2 lb/kg) x (60 min/hr) x H x SC / 1000$247,484$0$138,518$355,8153. Water = Q x (5220 liters water-min / liters feed-day) x (1 day / 24 hr) x H x (0.264 gal/liter) xWC / 1000$0$0 $43,194 $110,9534. Operating labor= (1 hr/shift) x (1 shift/8 hr) x H x LR$36,330$0$0$05. Supervisory labor= 0.15 x (operating labor)$5,450$0$0$06. Maintenance labor= (0.5 hr/shift) x (1 shift/8 hr) x H x (LR x 1.1)$19,982$0$0$07. Maintenance materials= 0.02 x TCI$0$0$0$0D. Indirect Annual Costs, $/yr1. Overhead= 0.6 x (labor + maintenance materials)$37,057$0$0$02. Property taxes, insurance, andadministration= 0.04 x TCI$0$0 $0 $03. Capital recovery= Equipment CRF x TCI$0$943,929$392,895$737,826F. Include in Annual Cost?yesyesyesF. Total Annual Cost1. $/yr= Direct Annual Costs + Indirect Annual Costs - Recovery Credit$352,381$943,929$574,607$1,204,593Sources:1. Cost equations: HON BID, Vol 1-b and 1-c, Nov 1992 (EPA-453/D-92-016c)2. Operating labor rate: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics, May 2008 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment andWage Estimates3. Electricity cost: Energy Information Administration. Average Industrial Retail Price of Electricity: October 2009.4. Water cost and steam cost: Air Compliance Advisor,version 7.5.5. ICIS, http://www.icis.com/v2/chemicals/9076567/vinyl-chloride/pricing.html, October 20, 2010. (Avg. $690/tonne = $0.313/lb)Parameters/CostsEquationDifference in cost due to controlling previously uncontrolled streams



# 167

# 	






Cost of Piping Additional Steams to Wastewater Stri pper Feed Tank

Wastewater Flow (GPM) 5.00E+01 Wastewater Flow (m^3/sec) 3.15E-03 Fluid Density (kg/m^3) 9.83E+02

Optimum Pipe Diameter (m) 6.66E-02 Optimum Pipe Diameter (inches) 2.62E+00 Caluclated (Rounded) Pipe Diameter (inches) 3.00E+00 Estimated Pipe Cost (304 Stainless)* (Jan. 2002 Dol lars) $/linear foot 5.00E+01 <----- Estimated Pipe Cost (Carbon Steel)* (Jan. 2002 Doll ars) $/linear foot 3.30E+00 Pump and Pumping Cost Pump cost (w/o motor)† 3.00E+03 1000 gpm, 20 ft, general purpose centrifugal Power Output (kW) (brake power) 1.13E+01 Pump motor cost§ 2.00E+03 Alternating Current, Explosion proof (~13 kW) Motor Efficiency‡ 8.70E-01 ~11.25 bkW Power requirement † (kW) 1.29E+01 Operating hours per year (Hrs) 8.40E+03 Electricity Cost ($/kWh) 7.00E-02 Electricity Cost per year ($/yr) 7.60E+03 Total Capital Investment Assumed length of pipe run (ft) 5.00E+02 Purchased cost of pipe (Stainless Steel) 2.50E+04 Purchased cost of pump 3.00E+03 Purchased cost of motor 2.00E+03 Equipment Cost 3.00E+04 Installation Factor** (Ratio of total cost for fittin gs and installation to the purchase cost for the new pipe) 1.40E+00 Installation Cost (includes pump and moto) 4.20E+04 Tax and Freight Factor†† 8.00E-02 Tax and Freight Cost 2.40E+03 Total Capital Investment (Jan. 2002) 7.44E+04 CE - July 02 (Pipes, Valves, and Fittings) 5.64E+02 CE - Feb 2010 (Pipes, Valves, and Fittings) 7.96E+02 Total Capital Investment (Feb. 2010) 1.05E+05 Annual Cost Annual interest rate (fraction): 7.00E-02 System life (years): 2.00E+01 Capital recovery factor: 9.44E-02 Taxes, Insurance, Admin Factor 4.00E-02 Electricity 7.60E+03 Taxes Insurance, Administrative 4.20E+03 Capital Recovery 9.92E+03 Total Annual Cost ($/yr) 1.18E+04 does not incl. capital recovery

* From Figure 12-4 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plan t Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers ** pg. 404 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers † Estimated from Figure 12-19 Peters, Timmerhaus, & W est. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers § Estimated from Figure 12-24 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Enginee rs ‡ Estimated from Figure 12-18 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Enginee rs †† - Eqn. 10.39 pg. 10-49 OAQPS Control Cost Manual Fifth Edition Feb. 1996 pg. 10-51 OAQPS Cost Control Manual (Ductwork)

Pipe Cost $/Linear Foot

Diameter 304/L. Stainless (Sch 40) Carbon Steel (Sch 40) 1.00E+00 1.70E+01 9.00E-01 2.00E+00 3.10E+01 2.10E+00 3.00E+00 5.00E+01 3.30E+00 4.00E+00 7.00E+01 5.80E+00 5.00E+00 9.00E+01 7.50E+00 6.00E+00 1.20E+02 1.00E+01 7.00E+00 1.60E+02 1.30E+01 8.00E+00 1.90E+02 1.70E+01 9.00E+00 2.10E+02 1.90E+01 1.00E+01 2.30E+02 2.00E+01 * From Figure 12-4 Peters, Timmerhaus, & West. Plan t Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers



# 168

# 	






Cost of Piping Additional Steams to Wastewater Stri pper Feed Tank Assumptions Assume Hard pipe wastewater flow to Stripper Feed T ank Assume all piped flow is turbulent Assume water temperature of 140F Optimum Pipe Diameter Calculation Eq. (12-15) Peter s, Timmerhaus, & West pg. 501

Where: Di,opt=optimum pipe diameter in meters

m v 

### =volumetric flow rate (m^3/sec)

p=fluid density kg/m^3

Assumed 20 ft of head

GPM TCI TAC CR 1.00E+01 4.73E+04 1.40E+04 4.47E+03 1.84E+04 5.00E+01 1.05E+05 1.18E+04 9.92E+03 2.17E+04 1.00E+02 1.40E+05 1.32E+04 1.32E+04 2.64E+04 5.00E+02 2.98E+05 1.95E+04 2.81E+04 4.76E+04 1.00E+03 4.20E+05 2.44E+04 3.97E+04 6.41E+04

  

### 

	  

###     

### 

         

        





!"#$%&'

!"(&'

!"#$%&'

	  

### 

 

       



# 169ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS02/09/2012Wastewater Testing and Monitoring Cost AlgorithmWastewater Sampling and MonitoringCost of US EPA Method 8260B$201 $400 $301*National Environmental Methods Index Website https://www.nemi.gov/apex/f?p=237:38:951365369293524::::P38_METHOD_ID:7041Cost of US EPA Method 305$190 http://analyticallaboratories.com/page.cfm?pageid=90 (Cost of Volatile Organics)Cost of US EPA Method 107$0 Assume no cost since facilities are presumably already testing VC (Based on VI submitted data).Number of Initial Test Runs1.00Number of Strippers1.00Number of Continuous Test Runs1.00Number of Continuous Tests per Year Monthly Testing12.00Number of Uncontrolled Streams (Asreported in survey data)Number of UncontrolledStreams with average formissing dataNon-VC HAP MeOH VC VCTotalNon-VCHAPMeOH VCTotal Non-VC HAPMeOHCTLC/OVDP/Model Facility1 1 $300.50 $190.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.50 $190.00 $0.00 $3,606.00 $2,280.00 $981.00FacilityNameNumber of Wastewater streamsFormosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge1Georgia Gulf Chemicals Aberdeen Facility1Lake Charles Polymer Plant1OxyVinyls Deer Park1OxyVinyls Pasadena7PolyOne Henry6Shintech Addis3Shintech Freeport1Shintech Plaquemine2Union Carbide Texas City6Westlake Calvert City1Westlake Geismar2Average3Initial Uncontrolled Stream TestingStripper Outlet TestingTotal InitialCost ($)Initial Continuous



# 170ATTACHMENT E- WASTEWATER ANALYSIS02/09/2012P38_METHOD_ID:7041$6,376.50TotalAnnualizedCost



# 171

# Attachment F

GACT Analysis for Heat Exchange Systems

172ATTACHMENT F- HEAT EXCHANGER ANALYSIS02/09/2012Heat Exchange Systems - Summary of Clarification Data Submitted to EPACalculated Emissions, Reductions, and CostsCompany Facility CT # Flow Rate (gpm) Pollutant Measured Leak Action Level Units Monitoring Frequency Monitoring Method Note(s)OVP Conc (ppbw) 5.931 10,000 Vinyl chlorideWeekly Water sampling - GC headspace% of LAL 12%2 5,000 Vinyl chlorideWeekly Water sampling - GC headspaceAvg LAL (ppbw) 1363 Based on M107 onlyVinyl chloride 10000 ppbw Quarterly Method 415.1Avg Conc (ppbw) 162LAL (ppbw) 50Cost per Repair ($/tower/yr) 4300Formosa Baton Rouge 1 48,000 Vinyl chloride 10 ppbw Daily Method 601DOR LAL (ppbw) 8001 6,000[no data]2 3,000[no data]DOR Period (days)120Formosa Point Comfort158700Repairs per yr 11 13,500 Vinyl chloride 250 ppbw Quarterly Method 1072 18,000 Vinyl chloride 250 ppbw Quarterly Method 107REPORTEDEMISSIONSFROM SURVEYVC Conc LAL BASELINE EMISSIONSEMISSIONREDUCTIONSREPAIR COSTS3 18,000 Vinyl chloride 250 ppbw Quarterly Method 107VC (tpy) (ppbw) (ppbw) VC (tpy) VC (tpy) ($/yr)1 40,000[cw pressure > process pressure]1.62E+02 1.36E+03 3.54E+00 2.45E+00 4.30E+032 22,300[cw pressure > process pressure]1.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.77E+00 1.22E+00 4.30E+033 1,181[no heat exchangers]1.19E+03 1.00E+04 4.29E+01 4.11E+01 4.30E+034 11,000[utility system]Vinyl chloride 5000 ppbw Monthly Method 1071.19E+00 1.00E+01 1.25E-01 0.00E+00 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 2.13E+00 1.47E+00 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.06E+00 7.34E-01 4.30E+03Vinyl chloride 5000 ppbw Monthly Method 1071.62E+02 1.36E+03 5.62E+01 3.88E+01 4.30E+032.97E+01 2.50E+02 8.78E-01 0.00E+00 4.30E+032.97E+01 2.50E+02 1.17E+00 0.00E+00 4.30E+03Vinyl chloride 50 ppbw Monthly Method 1072.97E+01 2.50E+02 1.17E+00 0.00E+00 4.30E+034.30E+034.30E+03Vinyl chloride 50 ppbw Monthly Method 1074.30E+034.30E+035.93E+02 5.00E+03 1.09E+01 1.00E+01 4.30E+03OxyVinyls Pedricktown 1 13,333 Vinyl chloride 1000 ppbv Continuous Similar to M106 and M21 [continuous monitoring of air above cooling tower]PolyOne Henry390005.93E+02 5.00E+03 1.56E+00 1.43E+00 4.30E+031 1,9002 1,850Shintech Addis4499.40E-025.93E+00 5.00E+01 9.40E-02 0.00E+00 4.30E+03Shintech Freeport360Shintech Plaquemine433Westlake Calvert City 1 23,000[no data]1.81E-015.93E+00 5.00E+01 1.81E-01 0.00E+00 4.30E+03Westlake Geismar 1 10,653 Vinyl chloride 50 ppbw Yearly Method 1071.19E+02 1.00E+03 3.47E+00 2.01E+00 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.38E+01 9.54E+00 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 6.73E-01 4.65E-01 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 6.55E-01 4.53E-01 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.59E-01 1.10E-01 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.28E-01 8.81E-02 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 1.53E-01 1.06E-01 4.30E+031.62E+02 1.36E+03 8.15E+00 5.63E+00 4.30E+035.93E+00 5.00E+01 1.39E-01 0.00E+00 4.30E+031.51E+02 1.16E+02 1.16E+05CertainTeed Lake CharlesDow Midland 1 16,500Formosa Delaware CityGeorgia Gulf AberdeenGeorgia Gulf PlaquemineOxyVinyls Deer Park1PolyOne Pedricktown8,4002 1,200OxyVinyls Pasadena1 9,0002 11,600



# 173ATTACHMENT F- HEAT EXCHANGER ANALYSIS02/09/2012Calculated Emissions, Reductions, and CostsTotal Capital CostTotal Annual CostControl Equip T&M$ $/yr VCM HCl D/F TOH VCM HCl D/F TOHControl Equip CapitalCost ($)TestingandMonitoringEquipCapitalCost ($)Control EquipAnnualizedCapital Cost($/yr)Control Equipmen Annual Cost ($/yr)Testing andMonitoringEquipAnnualizedInitial Cost($/yr)Testing andMonitoringAnnual Cost($/yr)Total CapitalCost ($)Total AnnualizedCost ($/yr)Baseline - VCM(TPY)Baseline - HCl(TPY)Baseline - D/F(TPY)Baseline - TOH(TPY)Reduction - VCM -(TPY)Reduction - HCl(TPY)Reduction - D/F(TPY)Reduction - TOH(TPY)Certain Teed - Lake Charles Area Source Bulk8.60E+03 5.31E+005.31E+00 3.67E+003.67E+00PolyOne - Henry PVC - Only Suspension, Dispersion, Suspension Blending4.30E+03 1.38E+011.38E+01 9.54E+009.54E+00PolyOne - Pedricktown PVC - Only Dispersion8.60E+03 1.33E+001.33E+00 9.18E-019.18E-01Formosa - Delaware City PVC - Only Dispersion, Copolymer (VACO-D)8.60E+03 3.19E+003.19E+00 2.20E+002.20E+00Dow - Midland PVC - Combined Copolymer (VDCO-S)4.30E+03 4.29E+014.29E+01 4.11E+014.11E+01Formosa - Baton Rouge PVC - Combined Suspension4.30E+03 1.25E-011.25E-01 0.00E+000.00E+00Formosa - Point Comfort PVC - Combined Suspension4.30E+03 5.62E+015.62E+01 3.88E+013.88E+01Georgia Gulf - Aberdeen PVC - Only Suspension1.29E+04 3.22E+003.22E+00 0.00E+000.00E+00Georgia Gulf - Plaquemine PVC - Combined Suspension1.72E+04 0.00E+000.00E+00 0.00E+000.00E+00OxyVinyls - Deer Park PVC - Combined Suspension8.60E+03 1.25E+011.25E+01 1.14E+011.14E+01OxyVinyls - Pasadena PVC - Only Suspension8.60E+03 2.75E-012.75E-01 0.00E+000.00E+00OxyVinyls - Pedricktown PVC - Only Suspension4.30E+03 3.47E+003.47E+00 2.01E+002.01E+00Shintech - Addis PVC - Only Suspension4.30E+03 1.59E-011.59E-01 1.10E-011.10E-01Shintech - Freeport PVC - Only Suspension4.30E+03 1.28E-011.28E-01 8.81E-028.81E-02Shintech - Plaquemine PVC - Combined Suspension4.30E+03 1.53E-011.53E-01 1.06E-011.06E-01Westlake - Calvert City PVC - Combined Suspension4.30E+03 8.15E+008.15E+00 5.63E+005.63E+00Westlake - Geismar PVC - Combined Suspension4.30E+03 1.39E-011.39E-01 0.00E+000.00E+00Control EquipT&MMACT Floor CostsBaseline Emissions and MACT Floor Emissions ReductionsMACT Floor Capital Cost ($)MACT Floor - Annual Costs ($/yr)Baseline Emissions (TPY)MACT Floor Emissions Reductions (TPY)



# 174

# Attachment G

GACT Analysis for Equipment Leaks

175ATTACHMENT G- EQUIPMENT LEAKS ANALYSIS02/09/2012Equipment Leaks Summary & CostsRTI Equipment Leaks Options Cost SummaryCapital CostsAnnualized Capital CostsAnnual Costs Total Annualized CostsPumps - Option 1 2.23E+03 	 Valves - Option 1  
 
Connectors - Option 1	 
 
 Total 
	  	Cost Summary for PRD Monitoring SystemsCTLCCost Summary for Equipment LeaksCompanyLDAR Program[1](A) PRV MonitoringSystem Capital Cost ($)(B) Capital CostIncrease of LDAR ($)(C) Initial Record Keepingand Reporting(D) TCI ($)C=A+B+C(E) AnnualizedCapital CostIncrease ofLDAR(F) Annual Increasein LDAR Cost(G) TotalAnnualized IncreaseLDAR CostG=E+F(H) AnnualizeCapital Cost ofPRV MonitoringSystem ($)(I) AnnualRecord Keepingand Reporting(J) TAC ($)J=G+H+IBaselineEmission[2](Tons/yr)Estimated EmissionReductions (Tons/yr)Certain Teed - Lake Charles40CFR61 V1.13E+056.42E+042.62E+031.80E+059.17E+036.50E+031.57E+041.61E+044.49E+033.63E+041.00E+014.64E+00OxyVinyls Deer Park40CFR61 V1.13E+056.42E+042.62E+031.80E+059.17E+036.50E+031.57E+041.61E+044.49E+033.63E+041.00E+014.64E+00New Source Model40CFR61 V1.13E+056.42E+042.62E+031.80E+059.17E+036.50E+031.57E+041.61E+044.49E+033.63E+041.00E+014.64E+00ComponentSource TypeEPAPRD Monitoring Costs



# 176	


Equipment Leaks EmissionsType of ComponentNumber ofComponents1SubpartV EmissionFactor(kg/hr/equipment)Subpart UU EmissionFactor(kr/hr/equipment)Subpart VEmissions(Tons/yr)Subpart UUEmissions(Tons/yr)EmissionReduction(Tons/yr)Pump Seals* Light-liquid service152.51E-036.95E-043.49E-019.65E-022.52E-01* Heavy-liquid service0Valves* Gas/vapor service7623.52E-042.03E-042.48E+001.43E+001.05E+00* Light-liquid service1533.90E-042.32E-045.53E-013.29E-012.24E-01* Heavy-liquid service0Connectors* Flanges - gas/vapor03.07E-043.07E-040.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00* Flanges - light liquid2,3223.07E-041.62E-046.60E+003.48E+003.12E+00* Flanges -heavy liquid0Agitators* Light-liquid service02.51E-032.51E-030.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00* Heavy-liquid service0Pressure Relief Devices* Disks20.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00* Disk holders, valves,etc.2NANAOpen-ended Valves333.33E-053.33E-051.02E-021.02E-020.00E+00Sampling Connections80.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00Compressor Vent02.28E-022.28E-020.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00Facility Total1.00E+015.35E+004.64E+00Equipment Counts from "Testing-Inspections-Environmental" "Re: Stratified data for 2008 monitoring" Bruce Brocka, Certain Teed Corp. Note that Flanges/Connectors were not Gas/Vapor or Light Liquid Specified -Assumed Light Liquid.



# 177ATTACHMENT G- EQUIPMENT LEAKS ANALYSIS02/09/2012Equipment Leaks Subpart V Cost (Based on CTLC Equipment Counts)Type of ComponentNumber ofComponentsInitialMonitoring Feeor Unit Cost($/comp)Initial LDARCosts ($/yr)(Capital)Initial LDARAdmin.CostsFrequency ofMonitoring(times/yr)SubsequentMonitoring Fee($/comp) orCharge (%)AnnualMonitoringCosts ($/yr)AnnualMaintenanceCosts ($/yr)Initial LeakFrequency(%)InitialNumberof LeaksSubsequentLeakFrequency (%)AnnualNumberof LeaksPercentRepairedOnLineRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)AnnualOnLine LeakRepair Cost($/yr)PercentRequiringFurther RepairRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)Annual OfflineLeak RepairCost ($/yr)Monitoringto VerifyRepair ($)Annual Admin.Cost ($/yr)AnnualMisc.Charges($/yr)Model 2Pump Seals* Light-liquid service1.50E+012.38E+011.20E+011.50E+005.80E+021.16E+022.42E+003.63E-012.29E-014.11E-011.00E+02############4.36E+020.00E+00######6.62E+010.00E+006.17E-019.31E+01* Heavy-liquid service0.00E+001.10E+000.00E+00Valves* Gas/vapor service7.62E+022.38E+01	
2.00E+001.50E+002.29E+033.34E-012.55E+003.34E-015.09E+007.50E+01############4.22E+012.50E+01######6.62E+013.37E+027.64E+00* Light-liquid service1.53E+022.38E+01	2.00E+001.50E+004.59E+023.34E-015.11E-013.34E-011.02E+007.50E+01############8.48E+002.50E+01######6.62E+016.77E+011.53E+00* Heavy-liquid service0.00E+001.10E+000.00E+00Connectors* Flanges - gas/vapor0.00E+001.10E+000.00E+00* Flanges - light liquid2.32E+031.10E+002.56E+03* Flanges -heavy liquid0.00E+001.10E+000.00E+00Agitators* Light-liquid service0.00E+002.38E+010.00E+001.20E+011.50E+000.00E+000.00E+002.42E+000.00E+002.29E-010.00E+001.00E+02############0.00E+000.00E+00######6.62E+010.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00* Heavy-liquid service0.00E+001.10E+000.00E+00Pressure Relief Devices* Disks2.00E+001.22E+022.44E+020.00E+002.00E+000.00E+004.88E+009.77E+00* Disk holders, valves,etc.2.00E+006.37E+031.27E+045.00E+006.37E+025.10E+02Open-ended Valves3.30E+011.41E+024.65E+035.00E+002.33E+021.86E+02Sampling Connections8.00E+006.88E+025.50E+035.00E+002.75E+022.20E+02Compressor Vent0.00E+001.05E+040.00E+005.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00Replacement Pump Seals1.50E+012.83E+021.03E+02Monitoring Instrument1.00E+001.08E+041.08E+04Data Collection System1.00E+001.45E+041.45E+04hr/activity$/hrAdministrative and Reports2.50E+029.27E+012.32E+04Planning and Training3.20E+029.27E+012.97E+04TOTALS7.39E+042.97E+043.33E+031.27E+034.87E+024.05E+021.77E+012.32E+041.02E+03Capital Costs103,539Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks0.244Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment0.142Annualized Capital Costs14,738Annual Expenses29,700Annual Fixed Costs ($/yr)103,04944,438Annual Variable Costs ($/yr)26,861



# 178ATTACHMENT G- EQUIPMENT LEAKS ANALYSIS02/09/2012Equipment Leaks Pumps Option 1 Cost (Based on CTLCEquipment Counts)Type of ComponentNumber ofComponentsInitialMonitoring Feeor Unit Cost($/comp)Initial LDARCosts ($/yr)(Capital)Initial LDARAdmin.CostsFrequency ofMonitoring(times/yr)SubsequentMonitoring Fee($/comp) orCharge (%)AnnualMonitoringCosts ($/yr)AnnualMaintenanceCosts ($/yr)Initial LeakFrequency(%)InitialNumberof LeaksSubsequentLeakFrequency (%)AnnualNumberof LeaksPercentRepairedOnLineRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)AnnualOnLine LeakRepair Cost($/yr)PercentRequiringFurther RepairRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)Annual OfflineLeak RepairCost ($/yr)Monitoringto VerifyRepair ($)Annual Admin.Cost ($/yr)AnnualMisc.Charges($/yr)Model 2Pump Seals* Light-liquid service1.50E+010.00E+001.20E+011.50E+001.55E+031.30E+021.35E+012.02E+002.56E-014.61E-011.00E+02############4.89E+020.00E+00######6.62E+010.00E+006.92E-011.04E+02* Heavy-liquid service0.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00Replacement Pump Seals4.00E+012.83E+025.72E+02hr/activity$/hrAdministrative and Reports0.00E+009.27E+010.00E+00Planning and Training0.00E+009.27E+010.00E+00TOTALS2.72E+030.00E+001.55E+031.30E+024.89E+020.00E+001.85E+000.00E+001.04E+02Capital Costs2.72E+03Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks2.44E-01Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment1.42E-01Annualized Capital Costs4.44E+02Annual Expenses2.27E+03Baseline MonitoringType of ComponentNumber ofComponentsInitialMonitoring Feeor Unit Cost($/comp)Initial LDARCosts ($/yr)(Capital)Initial LDARAdmin.CostsFrequency ofMonitoring(times/yr)SubsequentMonitoring Fee($/comp) orCharge (%)AnnualMonitoringCosts ($/yr)AnnualMaintenanceCosts ($/yr)Initial LeakFrequency(%)InitialNumberof LeaksSubsequentLeakFrequency (%)AnnualNumberof LeaksPercentRepairedOnLineRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)AnnualOnLine LeakRepair Cost($/yr)PercentRequiringFurther RepairRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)Annual OfflineLeak RepairCost ($/yr)Monitoringto VerifyRepair ($)Annual Admin.Cost ($/yr)AnnualMisc.Charges($/yr)Model 2Pump Seals* Light-liquid service1.50E+010.00E+00	1.20E+011.50E+001.55E+031.16E+022.42E+003.63E-012.29E-014.11E-011.00E+02############4.36E+020.00E+00######6.62E+010.00E+006.17E-019.31E+01* Heavy-liquid service0.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00Replacement Pump Seals4.00E+012.83E+021.03E+02hr/activity$/hrAdministrative and Reports0.00E+009.27E+010.00E+00Planning and Training0.00E+009.27E+010.00E+00TOTALS4.88E+020.00E+001.55E+031.16E+024.36E+020.00E+001.85E+000.00E+009.31E+01MonitoringRepairCapital Costs4.88E+024.88E+02Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks2.44E-01Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment1.42E-01Annualized Capital Costs7.98E+017.98E+01Annual Expenses2.19E+031.55E+035.52E+02Incremental Capital Costs2.23E+03Incremental Annual Costs4.43E+02



# 179ATTACHMENT G- EQUIPMENT LEAKS ANALYSIS02/09/2012Equipment Leaks Valves Option 1 Cost (Based on CTLCEquipment Counts)Type of ComponentNumber ofComponentsInitialMonitoring Feeor Unit Cost($/comp)Initial LDARCosts ($/yr)(Capital)Initial LDARAdmin.CostsFrequency ofMonitoring(times/yr)SubsequentMonitoring Fee($/comp) orCharge (%)AnnualMonitoringCosts ($/yr)AnnualMaintenanceCosts ($/yr)Initial LeakFrequency(%)InitialNumber ofLeaksSubsequentLeakFrequency (%)AnnualNumber ofLeaksPercentRepairedOnLineRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)AnnualOnLineLeakRepairCost ($/yr)PercentRequiringFurtherRepairRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)Annual OfflineLeak RepairCost ($/yr)Monitoringto VerifyRepair ($)Annual Admin.Cost ($/yr)AnnualMisc.Charges($/yr)Model 2Valves* Gas/vapor service7.62E+020.00E+002.00E+001.50E+002.29E+037.24E+005.52E+015.06E-017.71E+007.50E+011.67E-016.62E+016.40E+012.50E+014.00E+006.62E+015.11E+021.16E+01* Light-liquid service1.53E+020.00E+00	2.00E+001.50E+004.59E+024.84E+007.41E+005.06E-011.55E+007.50E+011.67E-016.62E+011.28E+012.50E+014.00E+006.62E+011.03E+022.32E+00* Heavy-liquid service0.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00hr/activity$/hrAdministrative and Reports0.00E+009.27E+010.00E+00Planning and Training0.00E+009.27E+010.00E+00TOTALS4.76E+030.00E+002.75E+030.00E+007.68E+016.13E+021.39E+010.00E+000.00E+00Capital Costs4.76E+03Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks2.44E-01Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment1.42E-01Annualized Capital Costs6.76E+02Annual Expenses3.45E+03Baseline MonitoringType of ComponentNumber ofComponentsInitialMonitoring Feeor Unit Cost($/comp)Initial LDARCosts ($/yr)(Capital)Initial LDARAdmin.CostsFrequency ofMonitoring(times/yr)SubsequentMonitoring Fee($/comp) orCharge (%)AnnualMonitoringCosts ($/yr)AnnualMaintenanceCosts ($/yr)Initial LeakFrequency(%)InitialNumber ofLeaksSubsequentLeakFrequency (%)AnnualNumber ofLeaksPercentRepairedOnLineRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)AnnualOnLineLeakRepairCost ($/yr)PercentRequiringFurtherRepairRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)Annual OfflineLeak RepairCost ($/yr)Monitoringto VerifyRepair ($)Annual Admin.Cost ($/yr)AnnualMisc.Charges($/yr)Model 2Valves* Gas/vapor service7.62E+020.00E+002.00E+001.50E+002.29E+033.34E-012.55E+003.34E-015.09E+007.50E+011.67E-016.62E+014.22E+012.50E+014.00E+006.62E+013.37E+027.64E+00* Light-liquid service1.53E+020.00E+002.00E+001.50E+004.59E+023.34E-015.11E-013.34E-011.02E+007.50E+011.67E-016.62E+018.48E+002.50E+014.00E+006.62E+016.77E+011.53E+00* Heavy-liquid service0.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00hr/activity$/hrAdministrative and Reports0.00E+009.27E+010.00E+00Planning and Training0.00E+009.27E+010.00E+00TOTALS2.32E+020.00E+002.75E+030.00E+005.07E+014.05E+029.17E+000.00E+000.00E+00Capital Costs2.32E+02Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks2.44E-01Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment1.42E-01Annualized Capital Costs3.30E+01Annual Expenses3.21E+03Incremental Capital Costs4.53E+03Incremental Annual Costs8.82E+02



# 180	


Equipment Leaks Connectors Option 1 Cost (Based onCTLC Equipment Counts)Type of ComponentNumber ofComponentsInitialMonitoring Feeor Unit Cost($/comp)Initial LDARCosts ($/yr)(Capital)Initial LDARAdmin.CostsFrequency ofMonitoring(times/yr)SubsequentMonitoring Fee($/comp) orCharge (%)AnnualMonitoringCosts ($/yr)AnnualMaintenanceCosts ($/yr)Initial LeakFrequency(%)InitialNumber ofLeaksSubsequentLeakFrequency (%)AnnualNumber ofLeaksPercentRepairedOnLineRepairTime(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)AnnualOnLine LeakRepair Cost($/yr)PercentRequiringFurther RepairRepair Time(hours)LaborCharge($/hr)Annual OfflineLeak RepairCost ($/yr)Monitoringto VerifyRepair ($)Annual Admin.Cost ($/yr)AnnualMisc.Charges($/yr)Model 2Connectors* Flanges - gas/vapor0.00E+002.38E+010.00E+002.00E-012.50E+000.00E+003.60E-010.00E+003.60E-010.00E+007.50E+011.67E-016.62E+010.00E+002.50E+012.00E+006.62E+010.00E+000.00E+00* Flanges - light liquid2.32E+032.38E+015.56E+042.50E-012.50E+001.45E+033.60E-018.36E+003.60E-012.09E+007.50E+011.67E-016.62E+011.73E+012.50E+012.00E+006.62E+016.92E+015.22E+00* Flanges -heavy liquid0.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00hr/activity$/hrAdministrative and Reports5.00E+019.27E+014.64E+03Planning and Training2.00E+019.27E+011.85E+031.45E+030.00E+001.73E+016.92E+015.22E+000.00E+000.00E+00TOTALS5.56E+041.85E+031.45E+030.00E+001.73E+016.92E+015.22E+004.64E+030.00E+00Capital Costs5.75E+04Capital Rec. Fac for Pump Seals and Rupture Disks2.44E-01Capital Rec. Fac for All other Equipment1.42E-01Annualized Capital Costs8.16E+03Annual Expenses6.18E+03



# 181

# Attachment H

GACT Analysis for Other Emission Sources

182

# ATTACHMENT H- OTHER EMISSION SOURCES ANALYSIS

02/09/2012

Other Emission Sources

Calculated GACT Baseline Emission Source Existing Source New Source Notes Reactor Openings Subpart F Subpart F

Gas Holders No Control No Control No Gas Holders at Existing Area Sources



## Existing and New Source GACT Summary for Other Emission Sources

Emission Source Existing Source

GACT Limit Option 1 Limit (Existing

Source Requirements) Emissions Reductions as a Result of Option 1 Complaince (tons/yr) Reactor Openings Subpart F Subpart F

- Gas Holders No Control Floating Objects 

## 

	



 Cost Component CTLC OVDP Model New Facility


## 
 	

	



  	


	
	

	
  



   !


 		 


 !"#" 		
	

 " 		

	
	

	
  


 "" ""  



# 183	






Other Emission Sources - Reactor Opening EmissionsTotal VOC Vinyl Chloride MethanolTotal VOC Vinyl Chloride MethanolTotal OrganicHAPCompany Facility Process VC (tpy) TOH (TPY)CertainTeedLake CharlesBReactor Openings6.69E+010.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01CertainTeedLake CharlesB3.35E-023.35E-02DowMidlandS0.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01DowMidlandS3.35E-023.35E-02Dow (Union Carbide)Texas CitySLFilter Openings8.81E-010.00E+006.69E+018.81E-016.78E+01Dow (Union Carbide)Texas CitySL3.35E-023.39E-02FormosaBaton RougeSFilter Openings1.03E+021.03E+021.03E+021.03E+020.00E+001.03E+02FormosaBaton RougeS5.13E-025.13E-02FormosaBaton RougeSReactor Openings8.62E+018.62E+018.62E+018.62E+010.00E+008.62E+01FormosaBaton RougeS4.31E-024.31E-02FormosaBaton RougeSVessel Openings1.03E+021.03E+021.03E+021.03E+020.00E+001.03E+02FormosaBaton RougeS5.13E-025.13E-02FormosaDeleware CityDReactor Openings0.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00FormosaDeleware CityD0.00E+000.00E+00FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitSFilter Openings1.60E-011.60E-011.60E-011.60E-010.00E+001.60E-01FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitS8.00E-058.00E-05FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitSReactor Openings2.13E+022.13E+022.13E+022.13E+020.00E+002.13E+02FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitS1.07E-011.07E-01FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitSStripping Column1.90E+001.90E+001.90E+001.90E+000.00E+001.90E+00FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitS9.50E-049.50E-04FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitSVessel Openings9.96E+009.96E+009.96E+009.96E+000.00E+009.96E+00FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitS4.98E-034.98E-03Georgia GulfAberdeenSVessel Openings0.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01Georgia GulfAberdeenS3.35E-023.35E-02Georgia GulfPlaquemineSReactor Openings0.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01Georgia GulfPlaquemineS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsDeer ParkSFilter Openings5.50E-035.50E-036.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsDeer ParkS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsDeer ParkSFoam Trap5.70E-025.70E-026.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsDeer ParkS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsDeer ParkSReactor Openings3.03E+013.03E+016.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsDeer ParkS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsDeer ParkSStripping Column3.04E-013.04E-016.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsDeer ParkS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsDeer ParkSVessel Openings1.01E+001.01E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsDeer ParkS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsDeer ParkSWaste Water Stripper0.00E+000.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsDeer ParkS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsPasadenaSCondensers1.90E-011.90E-016.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsPasadenaS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsPasadenaSFilter Openings4.70E-024.70E-026.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsPasadenaS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsPasadenaSReactor Openings8.23E+008.23E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsPasadenaS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsPasadenaSVessel Openings2.61E+011.00E-022.61E+011.00E-020.00E+001.00E-02OxyVinylsPasadenaS5.00E-065.00E-06OxyVinylsPasadenaSWash Columns8.60E-018.60E-016.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsPasadenaS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsPedricktownSFilter Openings0.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsPedricktownS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsPedricktownSReactor Openings4.89E+004.89E+004.89E+004.89E+000.00E+004.89E+00OxyVinylsPedricktownS2.45E-032.45E-03OxyVinylsPedricktownSRecovery Separators0.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsPedricktownS3.35E-023.35E-02OxyVinylsPedricktownSStripping Column4.89E+004.89E+004.89E+004.89E+000.00E+004.89E+00OxyVinylsPedricktownS2.45E-032.45E-03OxyVinylsPedricktownSVessel Openings0.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01OxyVinylsPedricktownS3.35E-023.35E-02PolyOneHenryS, DReactor Openings0.00E+006.69E+010.00E+006.69E+01PolyOneHenryS, D3.35E-023.35E-02PolyOnePedricktownDReactor Openings7.69E+035.49E+054.00E-024.00E-020.00E+004.00E-02PolyOnePedricktownD2.00E-052.00E-05PolyOnePedricktownDVessel Openings3.58E-023.58E-023.58E-023.58E-020.00E+003.58E-02PolyOnePedricktownD1.79E-051.79E-05ShintechAddisSReactor Openings1.33E+011.33E+011.33E+011.33E+010.00E+001.33E+01ShintechAddisS6.65E-036.65E-03ShintechFreeportSReactor Openings3.90E+020.00E+003.90E+020.00E+003.90E+02ShintechFreeportS1.95E-011.95E-01ShintechFreeportSStorage Sphere5.11E+000.00E+005.11E+000.00E+005.11E+00ShintechFreeportS2.56E-032.56E-03ShintechPlaquemineSReactor Openings5.00E+025.00E+025.00E+025.00E+020.00E+005.00E+02ShintechPlaquemineS2.50E-012.50E-01WestlakeCalvert CitySReactor Openings1.78E+021.78E+021.78E+021.78E+020.00E+001.78E+02WestlakeCalvert CityS8.88E-028.88E-02WestlakeCalvert CitySStripping Column2.72E+002.72E+002.72E+002.72E+000.00E+002.72E+00WestlakeCalvert CityS1.36E-031.36E-03WestlakeCalvert CitySVessel Openings3.00E-033.00E-033.00E-033.00E-030.00E+003.00E-03WestlakeCalvert CityS1.50E-061.50E-06WestlakeGeismarSReactor Openings1.05E+021.05E+021.05E+021.05E+020.00E+001.05E+02WestlakeGeismarS5.25E-025.25E-02* Excluded: compressors, pumps, exchangers.Average of Reported Emissions >0 lb/yr** PolyOne included with dispersion.Bulk0.00E+006.69E+010.00E+00Bulk0.00E+003.35E-020.00E+003.35E-02*** Dow - Midland added; no emissions reported fromequipment openings.Dispersion3.58E-023.58E-020.00E+00Dispersion3.79E-053.35E-020.00E+003.35E-02All Other5.57E+011.01E+028.81E-01All Other6.96E-011.40E+000.00E+001.40E+00Reported values from PolyOne - Pedricktown excluded.TOTAL6.96E-011.46E+000.00E+001.46E+00Average value applied to PolyOne - Pedricktown0.6960Total 2008 Emissions (lbs)Company Facility Process EquipmentTotal 2008 Emissions (lbs)



# 184ATTACHMENT H- OTHER EMISSION SOURCES ANALYSIS02/09/2012Other Emission Sources - Gas Holders	


			
	
	 !"#$
%	
&'())*)+,(-.*)-'(')*)-&(/.*)+0(&01)&	



&'23
4&		25
&
23
6
	25


7
)(..

8$9#3
2
23
	
+(+(5
2:-(), !"2;<-='9))) 
23


	

2<-4)>?@


	"-=+9)))Option 1 Limit (Existing Source Requirements)Table B.2 Total Capital Investment and Total Annualized Cost Estimate: Flow Indicator - Gas PhaseComponentEquation Cost ($)Capital and Other Initial CostsTotal Capital Investment ($2011)TCI5.00E+03Annualized CostsMaintenance and repairs3O&M=.07*TCI3.50E+02Taxes, Insurance3TI=0.04*TCI2.00E+02Interest Rate3i7.00E-02Equipment Life3(years)n7.00E+00Capital Recovery Factor4CRF=(i*(1+i)n)/((1+i)n-1)1.86E-01Capital Recovery4CR=CFR*TCI9.28E+02Total Annualized Costs ($/yr) ($2011)TAC=O&M+TI+CR1.48E+03LOWHIGHArea Source VCM Removed (ton/yr)(ton per gas holder)*(%Reduction)6.16E-01 2.31E+00References1 - Comments Of The Vinyl Institute, Inc., PVC Mact Working Group. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-00372 - Krock, Richard P. Memorandum to Ms. Jodi Howard. "Vinyl Institute Response to EPA Request for Additional Information on Work Practices for Gasholders at PVC ResinManufacturing Facilities." September 22, 20113 - Peters, Timmerhaus, and West. "Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers." Fifth Edition. McGrawHill. New York, NY. 2003. pg. 2684 - U.S. EPA. "Air Pollution Control Cost Manual." Sixth Edition (EPA/452/B-02-001). January 2002 pg 2-21



# 185

# Attachment I

Recordkeeping and Reporting Cost Estimation for Area Sources

186	

	
			  !"#!$!%!"!&"'"!&"'!(!)*+,-!.#!$!+!%/!0'/!0'!(!)1#-2#-!./#!$!%!.!'"..!'".!(!)3456-7#8!"#!$!%!"&!&'"&!&'"!(!)!9-*#),:!/#!%!.'&!.'&!(!)#-;+9#)<-6!/#!$!%0!&!&'"&!&'"!(!)-9*4+!/#!%!.'&!.'&!(!)	
	
	

	

#7#$**7#$**--*=#%%-#%4:346-=%>%%$<.6*5*-$-#:(*6#+-#65:)5*-+-#$:96-*(*5#-)5##6-#%6*-*)5:#%5*-55##-*(*-6''?"%>%%$<.6*5*-*%+#65:)--)#%6*-*)@*-#55:+#$:(*5*+>-<#A(##%+:4%-6''0#%''"%>%%$<.6*5*-)<##%!+*%85)-64%/'
#+:4%%9+:4%#4#::#$*+*-(*
6*-*)<-6+*%5)#%5*-)B4%B<6**-6**--#:*-@ A-#:*-4#:*-@ <A4#:*-



# 187

# Attachment J

Storage Vessel Information Provided in Facility Survey

188ATTACHMENT J- STORAGE VESSELS ANALYSIS02/09/2012Storage - Baseline EmissionsBaseline Emissions Analysis for Storage TanksTotal VOCTotal Organic HAPVinyl ChlorideTotal VOCTotal Organic HAPVinyl ChlorideTotal VOCTotal Organic HAPVinyl ChlorideCertainTeedLake CharlesB2.00E-012.00E-012.00E-012.00E-010.00E+001.00E-040.00E+00FormosaDelaware CityD7.06E+027.06E+027.06E+027.06E+020.00E+003.53E-010.00E+00PolyOneHenryD7.06E+027.06E+020.00E+003.53E-010.00E+00PolyOnePedricktownD7.06E+027.06E+020.00E+003.53E-010.00E+00DowMidlandS0.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00Dow (Union Carbide)Texas CitySL7.20E+027.20E+027.20E+027.20E+026.72E+023.60E-013.36E-01FormosaBaton RougeS2.01E+032.44E+032.01E+032.44E+036.72E+021.22E+003.36E-01FormosaPoint Comfort - PVCS0.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+000.00E+00Georgia GulfAberdeenS1.02E+039.85E+026.72E+024.92E-013.36E-01Georgia GulfPlaquemineS1.02E+039.85E+026.72E+024.92E-013.36E-01OxyVinylsDeer ParkS1.02E+039.85E+026.72E+024.92E-013.36E-01OxyVinylsPasadenaS1.02E+039.85E+026.72E+024.92E-013.36E-01OxyVinylsPedricktownS1.02E+039.85E+026.72E+024.92E-013.36E-01ShintechAddisS2.58E+032.12E+031.80E+032.58E+032.12E+031.80E+031.06E+008.99E-01ShintechFreeportS1.31E+034.03E+021.31E+034.03E+026.72E+022.02E-013.36E-01ShintechPlaquemineS4.20E+021.80E+021.80E+024.20E+021.80E+021.80E+029.02E-029.02E-02WestlakeCalvert CityS9.60E-020.00E+009.60E-020.00E+006.72E+020.00E+003.36E-01WestlakeGeismarS7.36E+014.65E+013.94E+017.36E+014.65E+013.94E+012.32E-021.97E-02Average of Reported Emissions >0 lb/yrTotals in Tons per YearBulk2.00E-012.00E-010.00E+00Bulk1.00E-041.00E-040.00E+00Dispersion7.06E+027.06E+020.00E+00Dispersion1.06E+001.06E+000.00E+00All Other1.02E+039.85E+026.72E+02All Other5.74E+005.06E+003.70E+00TOTAL6.80E+006.12E+003.70E+006.12E+003.70E+00* PolyOne - Henry included in dispersion category.Baseline Emissions, tons/yr** Average of reported emissions grater than zero for each category applied to facilities in that category that did notreport emissions.*** Certain Teed did not report a value for Vinyl Chloride - Since there are no other bulk facilities,a value of zerowas assumedCompany Facility ProcessReported Emissions, lb/yrBaseline Emissions, lb/yr



# 189