alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 (the "Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and I, Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated:  August 5, 2010
DO BUDGET DEFICITS RAISE INTEREST RATES?

January 13, 2003

Policymakers are currently engaged in a heated debate over whether Federal borrowing has a 

large effect on long-term U.S. interest rates. This is nothing new. Two years ago, President Bush’s 

critics feared that the tax relief he sought for the American people would detract from national

saving, significantly boost interest rates and undermine the economy. Those fears were unfounded

for several reasons:

• Although the Federal budget moved from surplus into deficit in FY 2002, the 2001 tax 

cut accounted for less than ten percent of the shift. By comparison, the weak economy

and the sudden drop in taxable capital gains realizations (due to the bursting of the stock

market bubble) accounted for roughly two-thirds of the swing. The remainder of the shift

was due to increased spending for national priorities such as national defense and homeland 

security.

• Long-term interest rates are determined in a global capital market for government

bonds. The outstanding supply of government debt issued by the world’s seven largest

countries is roughly $12 trillion, of which less than a third is debt issued by the U.S.

government. Foreign investors hold more than thirty percent of U.S. government debt.

• In the current world economy, with an integrated market in government bonds (at least

among the G7-G10 countries) and roughly similar inflation rates among countries (with the 

exception of Japan), it is a relatively straightforward matter to compare the real cost of

borrowing across countries. International evidence shows no relationship between

government debt and interest rates.

Treasury Office of Economic Policy

“I do not accept the assumption that it is somehow ‘risky’ to let taxpayers keep 

more of their own money.”

 President George W. Bush

Nominal Long-term Government Bond Yields and Gross 

Central Government Debt as a Share of GDP, 2001

2

3

4

5

6

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Central Gov't Debt as a Percentage of GDP in 2001

Nominal Interest 

Rate, %

US

Italy

Canada

France

Germany UK

Source: OECD, U.S. Treasury 

Department
EXHIBIT 32.02

                          Section 1350 Certification
                          --------------------------

In connection with this annual report of Futures Portfolio Fund Limited
Partnership (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (this "Report"), I, Barbara Rittenhouse, Comptroller of the General
Partner of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2006

/s/ Barbara Rittenhouse
-----------------------
By
Barbara Rittenhouse
Comptroller of the General Partner
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 4.1


 





Alaia Capital, LLC


62 West 45th St.


5th Floor


New York, NY 10036

 


 November 1, 2021 


 


 


 Defined Preservation 100 Fund, m+ funds Trust, Series 8-1 


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee

240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, New York 10286








 


 


		Re:	 m+ funds Trust, Series 8-1 (the “Trust”) 



 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


 We have examined Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement (File No. 333-255080) for the above captioned Trust. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator. 


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this
letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	Alaia Capital, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Ian Shainbrown	 
	 	 	Name: Ian Shainbrown	 
	 	 	Title:  Executive Vice President
#### Cecil EBEY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 3462.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 13, 1971.

C. O. Brown, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Stafford, Pitts & Bolen, by John L. Pitts, Jr., Alexandria, for defendants-ap-pellees.

Before SAVOY, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation suit in which plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the district court which sustained a plea of prescription of one year under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 23:1209.

Plaintiff sued his employer, Dresser Industries Valve and Instrument Division, and its compensation insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, on November 7, 1969, for workmen’s compensation, alleging that his work “caused his heart condition to become progressively worse”, rendering him permanently disabled. Plaintiff also alleged he was granted a leave of absence from Dresser because of a heart condition *540in September of 1968. He also alleged he was paid compensation through November, 1968.

On the trial of defendants’ plea of prescription, it was established that plaintiff’s employment was terminated on September 9, 1968, for the reason that plaintiff had to go to Houston, Texas, for heart surgery. This was due to a congenital condition and was not due to an accident or injury which occurred while in Dresser’s employment. The record also reveals that plaintiff was never paid workmen’s compensation, but was paid certain health and accident benefits under a group policy with Travelers.

In his brief filed in this Court, counsel for appellant contends that the district judge committed error in maintaining the defendants’ plea of one year prescription. As authority for his position, counsel relies on the cases of Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 220 La. 653, 57 So.2d 218; and Anderson v. Marion Plumbing Company, 236 So.2d 299 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1970).

The instant case is distinguishable from the Mottet and Anderson cases, supra, in that in those cases the respective plaintiffs came within the exception provided for in LSA-R.S. 23:1209, which recites:

> “ * * * where the injury does not result at the time of, or develop immediately after the accident, the limitation shall not take effect until the expiration of one year from the time the injury develops, * *

In Mottet and Anderson, supra, the court found the plaintiffs to have come within the exception to LSA-R.S. 23:1209. In the instant case we have no proven accident. Plaintiff was dismissed more than one year prior to the filing of the suit.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32(b)


           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                          (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Mark E. Maddocks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



December 13, 2010         /s/ Mark E. Maddocks
                         _____________________________________
                         Mark E. Maddocks
                         Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Dataram Corporation and will be retained by Dataram
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
#### The STATE of Florida ex rel. TRANSCOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Donald H. Ross, Mrs. Donald H. Ross, Leonard R. Mellon, Mrs. Leonard R. Mellon, Alan P. Salomon, Mrs. Alan P. Salomon, Relators, v. Honorable Harold R. VANN, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit, in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-1064.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
#### Gurney A. CRIBB, Jr., Petitioner, v. Ralph J. ELLISON, Individually, and Port Carriers, Inc., a corporation, Respondents.

No. 43047.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 15, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 174.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ.,'concur.

ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
Document

Exhibit 10.1.1

SUPPLEMENT TO SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY
Reference is hereby made to the Amended and Restated Subsidiary Guaranty (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Guaranty”) made as of January 2, 2020, by each of the Material Domestic Subsidiaries of Arcosa, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”) listed on the signature pages thereto (each, an “Initial Guarantor” and together with any additional Subsidiaries of the Borrower, which become parties thereto and together with the undersigned, the “Guarantors”) in favor of the Administrative Agent, for the ratable benefit of the Holders of Guaranteed Obligations, under the Credit Agreement.  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Guaranty.  By its execution below, the undersigned Arcosa StonePoint, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “New Guarantor”), agrees to become, and does hereby become, a Guarantor under the Guaranty and agrees to be bound by such Guaranty as if originally a party thereto.  By its execution below, the undersigned represents and warrants as to itself that all of the representations and warranties contained in Section 2 of the Guaranty are true and correct in all respects as of the date hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, New Guarantor has executed and delivered this Annex I counterpart to the Guaranty as of this 31st day of August, 2021.
ARCOSA STONEPOINT, LLC


By:      /s/ Gail M. Peck                
Gail M. Peck
Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000027099
<NAME>                         DATATAB, INC.



<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                            1,796
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   161,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                       1,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                164,490
<PP&E>                                                          126,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  125,727
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  165,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           281,183
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           788,955
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (917,154)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    165,584
<SALES>                                                         432,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                452,920
<CGS>                                                           401,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   513,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                112,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (60,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (60,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (60,901)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (.09)




</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 203 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, as the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2021 

Ms. GARCIA of Texas (for herself, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. BABIN, Mr. 

VELA, Ms. JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. ROY, Mr. 

VEASEY, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, and Mr. GREEN of 

Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENNY C. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4020 Broadway Street in Hous6 ton, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Benny 

7 C. Martinez Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 203 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DADE COUNTY, Florida, et al., Acting as Dade County Port Authority, Petitioners, v. PORT AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES LOCAL 1542, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 42451.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 17, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 534.

ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, C. J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31005]



[[Page 63145]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-2-002]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 18, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet:

Second Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 211

    Northern states that the above sheet addresses Northern's meter 
provisions and is being filed in compliance with the Commission's 
Letter Order issued December 22, 1995, in Docket No. RP96-2-001.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file protest with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestant a party to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31005 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2422 

To move the April 15, 2021 estimated tax payment deadline to May 17, 

2021 for individuals and corporations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Mr. MURPHY of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To move the April 15, 2021 estimated tax payment deadline 

to May 17, 2021 for individuals and corporations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELAY OF FIRST SCHEDULED INDIVIDUAL ES4 TIMATED TAX PAYMENT FOR 2021. 

5 In the case of any taxable year beginning in 2021, 

6 the second column of the table in section 6654(c)(2) of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied by 

8 substituting ‘‘May 17’’ for ‘‘April 15’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2422 IH

1 SEC. 2. DELAY OF FIRST SCHEDULED CORPORATE ESTI2 MATED TAX PAYMENT FOR 2021. 

3 In the case of any taxable year beginning in 2021, 

4 the second column of the table in section 6655(c)(2) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied by 

6 substituting ‘‘May 17’’ for ‘‘April 15’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 233 (Thursday, December 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64216-64217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-98-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company; Notice of Application

November 28, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 21, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern), P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas 77251-1642, 
and Koch Gateway Pipeline Company (Koch) (jointly referred to as 
Applicants), filed in Docket No. CP98-98-000, an application pursuant 
to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to 
abandon an exchange service by and between themselves, all as more 
fully set forth in the application on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    Applicants assert that they have agreed to terminate the exchange 
service pursuant to a letter agreement, dated April 12, 1996, which is 
evidenced by Texas Eastern's Rate Schedule X-131 and Koch's Rate 
Schedule X-168.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make protest with reference 
to said application should on or before December 19, 1997, file with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure provided for, unless otherwise advised, it will 
be

[[Page 64217]]

unnecessary for Applicants to appear or be represented at the hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31764 Filed 12-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-122199 and 333-114739) and Form S-8 (File No.
333-121140 and 333-105453) of Cash Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report
dated March 5, 2005, which appears on page F-2 of this annual report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004.


                                             /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 31, 2005