alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Walborg ANDERSON et al., Respondents.

No. 70-2.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 20, 1970.

Richard E. Conner and Gary Kahle, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery & D’Aiuto, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Robert S. Lyons, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.

*640PER CURIAM.

Certorari denied on authority of Shingleton v. Bussey, Fla.1969, 223 So.2d 713; Duran v. McPherson, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 233 So.2d 639, opinion filed March 6, 1970; Shipman v. Kinderman, First District Court of Appeal, 232 So.2d 21, opinion filed February 24, 1970; and Beta Eta House Corporation v. Gregory, Fla.App. 1970, 230 So.2d 495.

McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., and DRIVER, B. J., Associate Judge, concur.
**EXHIBIT 35.1****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**Re:  Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, f/k/a DCFS USA LLC, in its capacity as Servicer (the "Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2010, among Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1, as Issuer, Daimler Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Seller and Servicer (the Servicing Agreement"), for the period from April 21, 2010 to December 31, 2010 (the "Reporting Period") I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: (a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision. (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period except that: *with respect to servicing criterion 1122 (d)(4)(vii), certain loss mitigation or recovery actions were not initiated, conducted and concluded in accordance with the time frames or other requirements established by the transaction agreements. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC believes that distributions to the security holders were not materially impacted as a result of the material noncompliance noted above. Nevertheless, Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC is exploring procedural and policy changes to achieve full compliance with these requirements. Dated:  March 24, 2011 /s/ Brian T. Stevens________________Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: July 7, 2016 D-36-16

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a.
COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STANDARDS, ON MOTION Petitioner; HARALAMPO KASOLAS, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4165536)

Calendar Date: March 14, 2016 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Mulvey, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner. Haralampo Kasolas, Riverdale, New Jersey, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2003, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]). Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of-2- D-36-16

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application. Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>   1
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

1.   Laservision (Europe) Limited
     --  incorporated under the laws of England;

2.   Laser Vision Centres Limited
     -- incorporated under the laws of England;

3.   Laser Vision Limited
     -- incorporated under the laws of England;

4.   Laservision Harley Street Limited
     --  incorporated under the laws of England
     --  doing business under the name Harley Street Laser Vision Centre;

5.   LVCI Management (Quebec) Inc.
     --  incorporated under the Quebec Companies Act in the Province of Quebec,
         Canada;
     --  doing business under the name of Montreal Laser Vision Centre;

6.   LVCI Management (B.C.) Inc.;
     --  incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia;

7.   LVCI Management (Ontario) Inc.;
     --  incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada;
     --  doing business under the name St. Catharines Laser Vision Center;

8.   Laser Vision Centers (Calgary) Inc.;
     --  incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta), in the
         Province of Alberta, Canada
#### Louis Franklin DUTY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-851.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             MEIGUO VENTURES I, INC.
                              A DelawareCorporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Meiguo Ventures I, Inc. ("Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Teresita Rubio,
Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: March 30, 2011                      /s/ Teresita Rubio
                                           ---------------------------------
                                      By:  Teresita Rubio
                                      Its: Chief Executive Officer
#### Roy Lee BAKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 27, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court granted the appellant a delayed appeal, see Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239, upon his allegation that he was prevented by state action from filing his notice of appeal. He appeals the denial of a motion filed pursuant to CrPR 3.850, 33 F.S.A. The ground alleged was that he was not 'properly advised upon his plea of guilty.

A review of the record reveals that the appellant was represented by his personally selected private attorney and the plea of guilty to one count of a three count information was the result of negotiations in which appellant participated. The denial of the motion is affirmed.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33061]



[[Page 66384]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WY-921-41-5700; WYW116753]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

December 10, 1997.
    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188 (d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3 (a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW116753 for lands in Sweetwater County, Wyoming, was timely 
filed and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the 
date of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 
16 \2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW116753 effective September 1, 1997, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 97-33061 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000880416
<NAME>NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  597,234
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 40,533
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      52,354
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   166,767
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             856,888
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  160,999
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         25,900
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             186,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       335,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               70,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             264,988
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              856,888
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  147,492
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         9,393
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 105,302
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 122,714
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     24,778
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          (1,007)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              31,790
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    19,086
<NET-INCOME>                                12,704
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               12,704
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    30,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      93,414
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00





</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Charm Communications Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Wei Zhou, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 3, 2011



By:

/s/ WEI ZHOUName:

Wei ZhouTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



109
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5

<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from the June 30, 1997 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated 
statements of income, reinvested earnings and cash flows for the six-month 
period ended 06/30/97 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>       1,000
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                            16,638
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    136,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       5,767
<INVENTORY>                                                      147,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 335,021
<PP&E>                                                         2,515,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   828,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 2,578,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            179,035
<BONDS>                                                          270,553
<COMMON>                                                          44,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     1,251,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   2,578,326
<SALES>                                                          772,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 772,816
<CGS>                                                            637,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    637,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                16,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   94,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      35,814
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               58,432
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      58,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       1.31
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

RODNEY LAMAR MARSHALL, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

No. 70449 

FILED 

JUL 1 5 2016 

This is a pro se appeal from a purported decision denying a 

postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial 

District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge. 

No decision, oral or written, had been made on the petition 

when appellant filed his appeal on May 19, 2016. Because appellant failed 

to designate an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, 

and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

Rift a Pickering 

CC: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge 

Rodney Lamar Marshall 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

(0) 1947.4 ttE
#### Charles F. COPELAND, Jr., Appellant, v. NEW DEAL CAB COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Appellee.

No. N-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE ex rel. Robert Ellison CRAIG, Relator, v. Honorable Paul BAKER, Judge, Dade County Criminal Court of Record, Respondent.

No. 70-90.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 29, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2594 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2594

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 
 coinsurance requirement for certain colorectal cancer screening tests 
                 furnished under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2021

Mr. Payne (for himself, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. McEachin, Mr. 
 Fitzpatrick, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Casten, Mr. 
   Malinowski, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Morelle, Mr. Rush, Ms. Scanlon, Ms. 
Strickland, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Carbajal, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. 
  Lawson of Florida, Mrs. Axne, Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio, Ms. Williams of 
  Georgia, Mr. Raskin, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Guest, Mr. Van 
      Drew, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, Ms. Clark of 
  Massachusetts, Ms. Porter, Mr. Sires, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Cohen, Mrs. 
McBath, Ms. Norton, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Ruppersberger, Ms. Lee 
  of California, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Trone, Mr. Gallego, Mrs. 
Watson Coleman, Mr. Takano, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Evans, Mr. 
   Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Ms. 
    Plaskett, Mr. Carson, Mr. Kilmer, and Mr. Soto) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 
 coinsurance requirement for certain colorectal cancer screening tests 
                 furnished under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Colorectal Cancer Payment Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE COINSURANCE REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN COLORECTAL 
              CANCER SCREENING TESTS FURNISHED UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1833(dd) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(dd)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and before January 1, 
        2030,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by adding ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``through 
                2026, 85 percent; and'' and inserting ``and each 
                subsequent year, 100 percent.''; and
                    (C) by striking subparagraph (C).
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2020

No. 04-20-00134-CV

H.L. ZUMWALT CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ROAD REPAIR, LLC,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVQ002791D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due on April 7, 2020. On March 25, 2020, court 

reporter Vincente Mendoza filed a notification of late record, notifying this court that the 

reporter’s record has not been filed because: (1) appellant has failed to request the record, and (2) 

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the 

record.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order that appellant has requested the court reporter to prepare the 

reporter’s record, which request must designate the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits 

to be included. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1).

It is further ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) 

days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have 

been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporter’s fee.

The reporter’s record must be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the date appellant’s 

written proofs are filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, 

appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date the clerk’s record is filed, and 

the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a 

reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).
_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court