alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission

December 19, 1997.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Minor License.
    b. Project No.: P-2487-006.
    c. Date Filed: December 10, 1997.
    d. Applicant: John M. Skorupski.
    e. Name of Project: Hoosick Falls Water Power Project.
    f. Location: On the Hoosic River in Rensselaer County, near 
Hoosick, New York.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. Secs. 791(a)-
825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: John M. Skorupski, 71 River Road, Hoosick 
Falls, NY 12090, (518) 686-0062; Douglas C. Clark, PE, Clark 
Engineering & Surveying, P.C., 658 Route 20, P.O. Box 730, New Lebanon, 
NY 12125, (518) 794-8613.
    i. FERC Contact: Richard Takacs (202) 219-2840.
    j. Comment Date: 60 days from the filing date shown in paragraph 
(c).
    k. Description of Project: The proposed project would consist of: 
(1) An existing 16-foot-high and 149.5-foot-long dam; (2) an existing 
16-acre reservoir; (3) a powerhouse containing two generating units for 
a total installed capacity of 830 kW; (4) a 500-foot-long transmission 
line; and (5) appurtenant facilities. The applicant estimates that the 
total average annual generation would be 3,700 MWh, for the project.
    l. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the New 
York State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), as required by 
Sec. 106, National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of 
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.
    m. Pursuant to 18 CFR 4.32(b)(7), if any resource agency, Indian 
Tribe, or person believes that an additional scientific study should be 
conducted in order to form an adequate factual basis for a complete 
analysis of the application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian 
Tribe, or person must file a request for a study with the Commission 
not later than 60 days from the filing date and serve a copy of the 
request on the applicant.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33656 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In re ESTATE OF Harry Paul JOHNSON, Deceased. Rose Marie JOHNSON, Appellant, v. John H. JOHNSON, Diana Johnson Hartenstein, Ruth Ann Johnson Varns, and Paul Emerson Johnson, Appellees.

No. 68-206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

July 9, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Sobrescribir enlaces de ayuda a la navegación
      Inicio
                                                                        Guía para negociosView this page in English

  
      Guía del Comprador (Versión para llenar) Section Submenu
  Consejos para consumidores
              
        Guía para negocios
              
        Reembolsos
              
        Noticias
              
        Acerca de la FTC
              
        BuscarFile
        View PDF
  (153.26 KB)


La Ley de Automóviles Usados de la Comisión Federal de Comercio requiere a los concesionarios a fijar una Guía del Comprador en cada automóvil usado que esté a la venta. Esta versión se puede llenar.


Nov 2016
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-83392, No. 333-54980, No. 333-31138) of Escalon
Medical Corp. of our reports dated August 16, 2002 and September 19, 2003
relating to the financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form
10-K for the years ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2003, respectively.

/s/ Parente Randolph, LLC

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 19, 2003

                                      F-28
This is to signify thatTECO9015 NEWCASTLE DRIVESHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA 71129Testing Laboratory TL-306(Revised February 26, 2010)has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Testing Laboratories (AC89),has demonstrated compliancewith ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005,General criteria for the competenceof testing and calibration laboratories, andhas been accredited, commencing December 3, 2009, for the testmethods listed in the approved scope of accreditation.Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.Vice President President(see attached scope of accreditation for fields of testing and accredited test methods)Print Date: 02/26/2010Page 1 of 2TECO TL-306(Revised February 26, 2010)December 3, 2009Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.PresidentPrint Date: 02/26/2010Page 2 of 2TECOSteven Verhey9015 Newcastle DriveTechnical ManagerShreveport, LA 71129(608) 837-2790FIELDS OF TESTING ACCREDITED TEST METHODSPanel products ASTM Standards E 72 (Sections 14 and 15 only), D 3043 (Methods ‘C’ and ‘D’only), and E 661; CSA O325; US Department of Commerce Voluntary ProductStandards, PS 1 (Section 6, except Section 6.1.3.4), PS 2 (Section 7)Wood and wood based product ASTM Standards D 1037 (Sections 9, 11, 13 and 14 only), and D 4442Fasteners ASTM Standard D 1761 (Section 13 only)
August 6 , 2015

Mr. Robert Miller

135 Regency Square

Lafayette, LA 70508

Dear Mr. Miller :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ xx.xx of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It ex plains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your May 26

, filed in D ocket No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1897 , but we are unable to process

your request any further. Your petition do es no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the

following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, a nd the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exem ption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA
- 2015 - 4817 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM115AD

A300
- 57 - 6028, R06
--- 5/17/2006 A300
- 57 - 6028, R05
--- 1/11/2002 A300
- 57 - 6028, R04
--- 10/25/1999

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### Claire TIRSCH and the Estate of Harry Tirsch, Appellants, v. BEAU R. CORP. et al., Appellees.

No. 72-286.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1973.

Albert L. Weintraub, Miami, for appellants.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner & Hardy, Horton, Schwartz & Perse, West, Goldman & Weisberg, Richard M. Gale, Miami, for ap-pellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In an action by the appellant for damages for personal injuries suffered in a fall on hotel premises, trial of the case before a jury resulted in' a verdict in favor of the defendants, from which the plaintiff appealed.

The appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to give certain requested charges. We have examined the same in respect to the circumstances of the case as revealed in the record, and in light of the briefs and argument, and hold that no reversible error has been demonstrated. In our view the charges given by the court were legally sufficient.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Sooner  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on or about the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, R.C.  Cunningham  III,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  Information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  January 6, 2009

                                     /s/ R.C. Cunningham III

                                     -----------------------
                                     R.C. Cunningham III
                                     Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sooner Holdings,  Inc. and will be retained by Sooner Holdings, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 18

                                                                  Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
            AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
              Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (Unaudited)



<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                        2000          1999
                                                      (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>
Earnings:
  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                             $ 98,393      $ 82,730
  Interest expense                                     160,541       135,306
  Implicit interest in rents                             4,013         3,810

Total earnings                                        $262,947      $221,846


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                    $160,541      $135,306
  Implicit interest in rents                             4,013         3,810

Total fixed charges                                   $164,554      $139,116


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        1.60          1.59
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65687-65688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-106-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

December 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed 
in Docket No. CP98-106-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205 and 157.216) for authorization to abandon a small volume 
measurement station (farm tap) located in Dodge County, Minnesota, 
under Northern's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-401-000 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Northern states that it is in the process of replacing its Dodge 
Center Branchline. Northern states that it has negotiated with the two 
landowners along the route of the original pipeline regarding service 
lines to reconnect farm tap facilities. One of the farm tap users 
elected to reconnect their service line to Northern and will continue 
to receive service from their local distribution company (LDC). The 
other farm tap user (City of Dodge Center) elected to disconnect from 
Northern and has connected their service line directly to the LDC. As a 
result, Northern is requesting authority to abandon the City of Dodge 
Center farm tap facility.
    Northern states that the proposed activity is not prohibited by its 
existing tariff and that it has sufficient capacity to accommodate the 
proposed changes without detriment or disadvantage to Northern's other 
customers.

[[Page 65688]]

    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32595 Filed 12-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Quiet Creek 

Corporation 

5130 N Prairie Clover Trail 

Tucson, AZ 85704 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Dod<et Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Filed with www regulations.gov 

To whom It may concern, 

4 March 2015 

Since filing the 333 exemption on 31 October 2014, the CEO (Robert Davis) of the Qull!t'Qeek 

Corporation graduated with a Masters of Science in Geographic Information Systems 

Technology from the University of Arizona; a degree directly augmenting the proposed 

application of the UAS contained in the 333 exemption (agriculture and mining). 

Furthermore, the CEO, who wou.ld also be the principal fteld operator and 'pilot' of any UAS 

ftight, received his Private Pilot's certlfiCBte (temporary) on 3 March 2015. 

r 

f.dY~ Robert Davis 

CEO, Quiet Creek Corporation.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-31099

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEO LOSTON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:05-CR-50004-ALL

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leo Loston has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Loston has filed a response in which he argues

that the district court erred in denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion because

he is eligible for relief under Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines and

because relief was warranted. Loston also seeks the appointment of new

counsel. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Loston’s

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 23, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 08-31099 Document: 00511302688 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/23/2010
No. 08-31099

response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Loston’s motion for the appointment of new

counsel is DENIED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 08-31099 Document: 00511302688 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/23/2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ML Life Insurance Company of New York
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John T. Mallett, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ JOHN T. MALLETT
John T. Mallett
Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
March 26, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ML Life Insurance Company of New York and will be retained by ML
Life Insurance Company of New York and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0401

FROM: EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality

DATE: May 16, 2014

SUBJECT: Teleconference with DriveGreen

On April 17, 2014, Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) staff held a teleconference 

with staff of DriveGreen. This memorandum provides written documentation and a brief 

summary of this teleconference.

This teleconference discussed DriveGreen’s biogas to electricity and biogas to CNG/LNG 

pathways as relative to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Regulation of Fuels and Fuel 

Additives: RFS Pathways II and Technical Amendments to the RFS 2 Standards (Docket ID

EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0401). OTAQ staff participating included Sharyn Lie, Vincent Camobreco, 

Aaron Levy, and Deborah AdlerReed. 

DriveGreen representatives participating included Robert Cleaves and Gordon Grimes.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.**

 

**Subsidiaries as of January 1, 2005**

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**                                        | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** | ** ** | **Percent Voting  Securities Owned** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
|                                                          |       |                               |       |                                 |       |
| Appliance Recycling Centers of  America-California, Inc. |       |                               | California |                                 |       | 100 | % |
|                                                          |       |                               |       |                                 |       |   |   |
| ARCA of St. Louis, Inc.                                       |       |                               | Missouri   |                                 |       | 100 | % |
|                                                          |       |                               |       |                                 |       |   |   |
| North America Appliance Company                               |       |                               | Texas      |                                 |       | 60 | % |

 

----
#### Thomas R. WORSLEY and Frances I. Worsley, his wife, Appellants, v. Larry H. LOVELAND, Appellee.

No. 73-1193.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.