### 52894 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations

demonstrate attainment of the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for Lake and Marion Counties for an additional ten years. [FR Doc. E9–24695 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**
**[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0473; FRL–8956–8]**

**Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin**  **Valley Air Pollution Control District**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on July 13, 2009 and concern volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from graphic arts printing operations, digital printing operations, adhesives, cleaning solvents, transfer of organic liquids, and facilities engaged in coating of wood products, flat paneling, paper, film, foil, and fabric. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
**DATES :**  Effective Date: This rule is effective on November 16, 2009.

**ADDRESSES :**  EPA has established docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0473 for this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at http:// www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location ( e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location ( e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**  section.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 4126, law.nicole@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action

On July 13, 2009 (74 FR 33399), EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP.

Local agency Rule # Rule title Adopted Submitted

SJVAPCD .................... 4606 Wood Products and Flat Wood Paneling Product Coating Operations. 10/16/08 12/23/08

SJVAPCD .................... 4607 Graphic Arts and Paper, Film, Foil, and Fabric Coatings ................. 12/18/08 03/17/09 SJVAPCD .................... 4624 Transfer of Organic Liquid ................................................................. 09/2 0/07 03/07/08 SJVAPCD .................... 4653 Adhesives ...................................................................................... .... 12/20/07 03/07/08

We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

EPA’s proposed action provided a 30- day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments.

III. EPA Action

No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving these rules into the California SIP. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. );

• Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. );

• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);

• Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

• Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

• Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and

• Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the


### 52895 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations

Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register . A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register

. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 14, 2009. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

Dated: August 26, 2009. Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

■ Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
**PART 52—[AMENDED]**

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
**Subpart F—California**

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(354)(i)(E)( 3) and ( 4), (363)(i)(A)(2) and (364) to read as follows:

**§ 52.220 Identification of plan.** * * * * *

(c) * * * (354) * * * (i) * * * (E) * * * ( 3) Rule 4624, ‘‘Transfer of Organic Liquid,’’ adopted on December 20, 2007.

( 4) Rule 4653, ‘‘Adhesives,’’ adopted on September 20, 2007.
* * * * * (363) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * ( 2) Rule 4607, ‘‘Graphic Arts and Paper, Film, Foil, and Fabric Coatings,’’ adopted on December 18, 2008.

■ (364) New and amended regulations were submitted on December 23, 2008 by the Governor’s designee.

(i) Incorporation by Reference. (A) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.

( 1) Rule 4606, ‘‘Wood Products and Flat Wood Paneling Product Coating Operations,’’ adopted on October 16, 2008. * * * * * [FR Doc. E9–24687 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**
**Defense Acquisition Regulations System** 

**48 CFR Parts 204, 205, 209, 225, 241, and 244** 
**Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS);**  **Technical Amendments**

**AGENCY :**  Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to specify the debarring and suspending official for the Defense Intelligence Agency and update other references within the DFARS text.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: October 15, 2009

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Amy Williams, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), IMD 3D139, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3062. Telephone 703–602–0328; facsimile 703–602–7887.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  A. Background

This final rule amends DFARS text as follows:

204.7107. Adds a pointer to the procedures on agency accounting identifiers in the DFARS companion resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information.

205.301. Corrects the cross-reference to the exception for acquisitions of chemical warfare protective clothing from the restrictions on food, clothing, fabrics, and hand or measuring tools at 225.7002 and revises the cross-reference to the definition of ‘‘qualifying country.’’

209.403. Specifies the debarring and suspending official for the Defense Intelligence Agency.

225.7002–2. Revises the crossreference to the definition of ‘‘qualifying country.’’

241.103. Correct the statutory reference to 10 U.S.C. 2688(d)(2).

244.403. Correct the reference to the current specialty metals clause, 252.225.7009, Restriction on Acquisition of Certain Articles Containing Specialty Metals. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204, 205, 209, 225, 241, and 244

Government procurement.
Amy G. Williams, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

■ Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204, 205, 209, 225, 241, and 244 are amended as follows:

■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 204, 205, 209, 225, 241, and 244 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

**PART 204—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS** 

■ 2. Section 204.7107 is revised to read as follows:
**204.7107 Contract accounting classification reference number (ACRN) and**  **agency accounting identifier (AAI).**

Traceability of funds from accounting systems to contract actions is accomplished using ACRNs and AAIs. Follow the procedures at PGI 204.7107 for use of ACRNs and AAIs.

**PART 205—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS** 

■ 3. In section 205.301, paragraph (a)(iii)(b) is revised to read as follows:

**205.301 General.**

(a) * * * (iii) * * * (B) ‘‘The exception at DFARS 225.7002–2(n) applies to this acquisition, because the contracting officer has determined that this acquisition of chemical warfare protective clothing furthers an agreement with a qualifying country identified in DFARS 225.003(10).’’

**PART 209—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS** 

■ 4. Section 209.403 is amended by revising paragraph (1) of the definition