alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30977]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 111497B]


Marine Mammals; Permit No. 1004 (P595)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service, (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Scientific research permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a request for amendment of 
scientific research no. 1004 submitted by the Whale Conservation 
Institute, 191 Weston Road, Lincoln, MA 01773, has been granted.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment, in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); and
    Director, Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, 
MA 01930-2298 (508/281-9250).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 16, 1997, notice was published 
in the Federal Register (62 FR 48611) that an amendment of permit no. 
1004, issued June 21, 1997 (61 FR 33906) had been requested by the 
above-named organization. The requested amendment has been granted 
under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (MMPA) 
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the regulations governing the 
taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216), the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
seq.), and the regulations governing endangered species permits (50 CFR 
parts 217-227).
    Permit No. 1004 has been amended to: (1) extend the expiration date 
of the permit from June 30, 1998 to November 30, 1998; (2) increase the 
number of imported southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) tissue 
samples taken at Peninsula Valdez, Argentina from 20 to 340; and (3) 
redefine these ``tissue samples'' from southern right whales to include 
baleen, blood and bone, skin/blubber and organ tissues (from dead/
stranded whales), and sloughed skin (from live free-ranging whales).
    Issuance of this amendment as required by the ESA of 1973 was based 
on a finding that the permit: (1) was applied for in good faith; (2) 
will not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is 
the subject of this permit; and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in Section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: November 19, 1997.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-30977 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,988-01
EX P ARTE JULIO ZUNIGA, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2014CR0936-W1 IN THE 187 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM BEXAR COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s co n v i cted of murder and sentenc ed to fiftee n year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends that he was denied the right to appea l. The trial court has deter mined that trial counsel was allowed to withdraw and appellate counsel was not appointed. The State and trial court a greethat Applicant is entitled to an out-of- time appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to th e o pportunity to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 2014CR0936 from the 187 District Court of Be x ar County
. t h2

Applicant is ordered returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningf ul appea l. Within ten day s of the issuanceof this opinion, the trial cour t shall de termine whether Applicant is indig ent. I f Applicant is indig ent and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an at t o rn ey to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues
. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s afte r the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant’s rema ining claims are dismiss ed. Ex Parte Torres , 943 S.W .2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Copies of this o pinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: April 1, 2015 Do not publish
Exhibit 32   Certifications   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of American General Finance Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|      |                                                   |                          |  |  | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ |  |  | 
|      | /s/                                               | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|      |                                                   | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|      | President and Chief Executive Officer             |                         
|      | /s/                                               | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      |                                                   | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |                         
|Date: | May 11, 2010                                      |                          |  | 

72
City of Sacramento, California 

Recovery Plan 

State and Local Fiscal Recovery 

Funds: 2021 Report (08/31/2021)

Draft Plan: 

At this time nothing has been formally approved by our legislative body. The City 

Council for the City of Sacramento had an initial discussion on a Proposed American 

Rescue Plan framework and funding priorities document on Tuesday, August 24, 2021, 

(https://sacramento.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=22&clip_id=5030&meta_id=642121). 

However, we have completed our revenue replacement calculations and based on this 

may be reporting our entire ARP allocation of $112 million under the revenue 

replacement category (6.1) and with the intention of using these resources for general 

governmental purposes.
This is to signify that

TECO

9015 NEWCASTLE DRIVE 

SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA 71129 

Testing Laboratory TL-306 

(Revised February 26, 2010) 

has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Testing Laboratories (AC89), has demonstrwith ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005, General criteria for the competence of testing and calibration l

has been accredited, commencing December 3, 2009, for the test methods listed in the approved scope of a Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.  Vice President President 

(see attached scope of accreditation for fields of testing and accredited test methods)

Print Date: 02/26/2010 
TECO TL-306 

(Revised February 26, 2010) 

December 3, 2009 

 Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E. 

President 

Print Date: 02/26/2010 

TECO 9015 Newcastle Drive TeShreveport, LA 71129 

FIELDS OF TESTING ACCREDITED TEST METHODS 

Panel products ASTM Standards E 72 (Sections 14 and 15 only), D 3043 (Meth

only), and E 661; CSA O325; US Department of Commerce VoluStandards, PS 1 (Section 6, except Section 6.1.3.4), PS 2 (Sect

Wood and wood based product ASTM Standards D 1037 (Sections 9, 11, 13 and 14 only), and D Fasteners ASTM Standard D 1761 (Section 13 only)
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 12136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04027]

[[Page 12136]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8193]

Preparations for the International Telecommunication Union World 
Telecommunication Development Conference (ITU WTDC 2014)

SUMMARY: This notice announces meetings of an ad hoc group of the 
Department of State's International Telecommunication Advisory 
Committee (ITAC) to begin preparations for the ITU World 
Telecommunication Development Conference (WTDC 2014). The meetings are 
announced to the ITAC committee and referred to the ITAC-D ad hoc for 
action. The process for joining the ITAC-D ad hoc is described.
    The Department of State announces the beginning of the preparatory 
process for the ITU WTDC to be held in 2014. The preparatory meetings 
will be held by the ITAC-D ad hoc of the ITAC on Tuesdays March 12 and 
19, April 2, 16, and 30, 2013 at 1300 Eye Street NW., Washington, DC 
fourth floor West Tower, all at 2-4 p.m. Eastern Time.
    Attendance at these meetings is open to the public as seating 
capacity allows. The public will have an opportunity to provide 
comments at these meetings. A conference bridge will be provided to 
those people outside the Washington Metro area who request it from the 
secretariat.
    Initial details on these meetings will be announced on the 
Department of State's email list, ITAC@lmlist.state.gov. Subsequent 
emails will be posted on the Department of State's email list, ITAC-D@lmlist.state.gov.
    People desiring further information on these preparatory meetings, 
including those wishing to request reasonable accommodation to attend 
the meeting and those who wish to participate in the ITAC or ITAC-D 
lists, should contact the Secretariat at both minardje@state.gov and 
jminard@artelinc.com, by March 1, 2013.

    Dated: February 14, 2013.
Doreen McGirr,
Foreign Affairs Officer, International Communications & Information 
Policy, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-04027 Filed 2-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,561
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                       213
<INVENTORY>                                     23,135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,555
<PP&E>                                          29,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,895
<BONDS>                                         16,115
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,397
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,846
<SALES>                                         49,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,317
<CGS>                                           29,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     51
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 31
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        31
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
#### In the Interest of K. W. N., a Child.

No. 73-205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Lewis Kapner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
### Docket No. 61313 In his motion filed on June 4, 2012, appellant sought presentence credit in case C254735. Appellant's claim for presentence credit is a challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction and sentence and such a claim must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and is subject to the procedural time bar set forth in NRS 34.726(1). 

### Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169-70 (2006). Appellant's motion was untimely as it was filed more than two years after entry of the judgment of conviction on January 14, 2010. Appellant did not attempt to demonstrate cause for the delay. Therefore, we affirm the order of the district court denying the motion in this case. 

### Docket No. 61314

In his motion filed on June 4, 2012, appellant sought 405 days of presentence credit in case C261607. Appellant's claim for presentence credit should have been filed in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Id. However, the motion was timely as it was filed within one-year from entry of the judgment of conviction on July 21, 2011, in C261607. NRS 34.726(1). The motion, nevertheless, lacked merit as appellant sought credit for time served in other cases. 2See NRS

2 Appellant's reliance upon 

### Johnson v. State, 120 Nev. 296, 89 P.3d 669 (2004) is misplaced as 

### Johnson relates to concurrent sentences within a single judgment of conviction and not concurrent sentences between separate judgments of conviction. Id. at 298, 89 P.3d at 670.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2Hardesty



# pc, Parraguirre 176.055(1). Therefore, we affirm the order of the district court denying the motion in this case. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgments of the district court AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge Ronald Eugene Midby Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

3
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2017

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/28 10/3 10/5 10.00 28.00 18.00 102.00 -46.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 10/5 10/10 10/12 10.00 28.00 18.00 122.00 -66.00

10/12 10/17 10/19 50.00 31.00 22.00 102.00 1.00

10/19 10/24 10/26 55.00 36.00 24.00 20.00 97.00 38.00

10/26 10/31 11/2 60.00 41.00 26.00 81.00 46.00

11/2 11/7 11/9 60.00 41.00 33.00 101.00 33.00

11/9 11/14 11/16 65.00 43.00 36.00 121.00 23.00

11/16 11/21 11/23 65.00 45.00 41.00 30.00 126.00 55.00

11/23 11/28 11/30 65.00 45.00 41.00 131.00 20.00

11/30 12/5 12/7 65.00 48.00 44.00 151.00 6.00

12/7 12/12 12/14 65.00 48.00 44.00 136.00 21.00

12/14 12/19 12/21 65.00 48.00 44.00 30.00 136.00 51.00

12/21 12/26 12/28 65.00 48.00 44.00 136.00 21.00

1745.00 1542.00 203.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

69-DAY BILL 10/26 10/27 45.00 0.00 45.00

Matures 1/4/18

72-DAY BILL 11/6 11/7 55.00 0.00 55.00

Matures 1/18/18

72-DAY BILL 12/4 12/5 55.00 0.00 55.00

Matures 2/15/18

CMB Funds: 155.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

2-year note 9/21 9/26 10/2 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 9/21 9/27 10/2 13.00 0.00

5-year note 9/21 9/27 10/2 34.00 0.00

7-year note 9/21 9/28 10/2 28.00 0.00 79.97 21.03

3-year Note 10/5 10/10 10/16 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 10/5 10/11 10/16 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 10/5 10/12 10/16 12.00 0.00 27.00 29.00

30-year TIPS (r) 10/12 10/19 10/31 5.00 0.00 0.00 5.00

2-year note 10/19 10/24 10/31 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 10/19 10/25 10/31 15.00 0.00

5-year note 10/19 10/25 10/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 10/19 10/26 10/31 28.00 0.00 122.89 -19.89

3-year Note 11/1 11/7 11/15 26.00 2.00

10-year Note 11/1 11/8 11/15 24.00 1.00

30-year Bond 11/1 11/9 11/15 16.00 1.00 42.67 23.33

2-year FRN (r) 11/16 11/21 11/24 15.00 2.00 0.00 13.00

10-year TIPS (r) 11/9 11/16 11/30 12.00 1.00

2-year note 11/16 11/20 11/30 28.00 2.00

5-year note 11/16 11/21 11/30 35.00 1.00

7-year note 11/16 11/22 11/30 29.00 1.00 83.27 20.73

3-year Note 12/7 12/11 12/15 27.00 1.00

10-year Note (r) 12/7 12/12 12/15 21.00 1.00

30-year Bond (r) 12/7 12/13 12/15 13.00 1.00 25.00 36.00

5-year TIPS (r) 12/14 12/21 12/29 15.00 1.00 0.00 15.00

425.00 380.79 143.21

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 501
#### Larry P. SUMMERLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1903.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 14, 1978.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

OTT, Judge.

On June 28, 1977 an information charged that appellant and a co-defendant committed a robbery on April 3, 1977, during the course of which “the said (co-defendant and appellant) did carry a deadly weapon, to wit: A FIREARM.”

Appellant entered a plea of not guilty. On August 15, 1977 another plea hearing was held with an assistant state attorney and counsel for the appellant present. Appellant’s plea was changed to nolo conten-dere. Sentence was deferred pending receipt and review of a pre-sentence investigation.

On October 7, 1977 the co-defendant and appellant came before the court for sentencing. The court announced its intention to withhold adjudication and place the co-defendant and appellant on probation. The assistant state attorney objected on the grounds that a mandatory three year sentence was required pursuant to Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1976). After considerable colloquy between the court, the assistant state attorney and appellant’s counsel the hearing was continued for several hours and then resumed later the same *806day. The court and appellant’s counsel were clearly of the impression that appellant was pleading to the lesser offense of robbery and that the state either had abandoned or was unable to prove the firearm violation. The state insisted that the plea of nolo contendere having been accepted there was no alternative for the court but to enter the mandatory three year sentence. At the conclusion of the hearing the court, over the state’s objection, announced that it was either striking or dismissing that portion of the information dealing with a firearm violation. The trial court entered its order withholding adjudication and placing appellant on probation for a period of two years.

Thereafter, the state filed a motion for correction of the sentence pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.800. After a hearing on this motion the court granted the state’s motion and imposed the mandatory three year sentence. Under the prevailing confusion we hold that the appellant’s change of plea was not voluntarily entered and we, therefore, set aside the judgment and sentence and remand with directions that the court afford the appellant the opportunity to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and DAN-AHY, J., concur.
#### Rufus TOLBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-429.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 10, 1972.

Rufus Tolbert, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

*90PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent-defendant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. State v. Silva, Fla. 1972, 259 So.2d 153. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jasper LYNCH v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, State Penitentiary, Judge, Section “I”, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana.

No. 60894.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Jasper Lynch applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Denied. Trial court acted December 20, 1976.
#### Earl RUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-2274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 11, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction and sentence relating to aggravated assault are herewith affirmed.

The conviction and sentence relating to carrying a pistol without a permit is hereby reversed upon the authority of *Jenkins v. State of Florida,*opinion issued August 2, 1977 (4th DCA), 349 So.2d 1191, wherein the Court stated:

> Jenkins was also charged with carrying a concealed weapon. He claims error by the trial court in instructing the jury that *812manual possession of a pistol without a license was a lesser included offense. We agree. Manual possession of a firearm without a license is not a necessarily included lesser offense of carrying a concealed weapon.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

CROSS, J., concurs only in conclusion.