alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COTTON STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       100,342,477
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       16,086,746
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         16,509,744
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                   3,401,841
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             138,912,765
<CASH>                                         401,482
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,441,505
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      36,230,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             183,065,824
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            116,465,872
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,754,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,079,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               183,065,824
<PREMIUMS>                                   5,356,327
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          2,301,675
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             122,552
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 865,306
<BENEFITS>                                   4,135,441
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    765,859
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,928,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,815,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                   608,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

101) ll-K-(B)-90 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:51 AM Sheet 101 of 325 
P.2 

W P 

II-K-(B)-90 

N0X COMBUSTION MODIFICATION COST ALGORITHM DEVELOPMENT 

Letter from M. Jennings, Radian to L. Jones, EPA:ESED 

August 31, 1982 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-90
Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Massachusetts Electric
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we,
Michael G. Morris, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
John H. Forsgren, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Northeast Utilities Service Company, agent for the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Michael G. Morris
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    (Signature)
    Michael G. Morris
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren (Signature)
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    John H. Forsgren
    Executive Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer of Northeast Utilities Service Company,
    as Agent for the Company


August 7, 2002
#### Anthony WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-558.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1978.

*883Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony White was charged in a two-count information with rape and with breaking and entering a dwelling and unlawfully assaulting a person therein. This appeal is from a judgment of conviction on a jury verdict finding White guilty as charged on both counts of the information and a sentence thereon to two 99 year terms in the state penitentiary. The sole point on appeal concerns a remark by the prosecutor which is alleged to be a comment on the defendant’s failure to testify. On the facts of this case, no error has been demonstrated.

The record reflects that White’s defense at trial was insanity. He advised his attorney that he wished to take the stand and testify in his own behalf. Defense counsel, outside jury presence, announced to the court that the defendant asked to take the stand against advice of counsel. Anthony White was then called to the stand by his attorney, but he remained seated at the counsel table with his head hung low and his hands at his side. The court asked White whether he needed help getting to the stand. White did not answer, and remained seated in the same position. At this time, the prosecutor made the statement now being asserted as error, that “ . it must be obvious that the defendant does not wish to take the stand.” The court inquired as to whether White wished to take the stand. White remained seated and silent for a few seconds and then stood up, pushed the counsel table into the air, removed his shirt and proceeded to scream vituperous remarks. White was subdued as he backed up toward the jury panel with his hands together in the position of one hand carrying an imaginary firearm aimed at the jury, stating that he was going to kill all of them. After he was subdued, the jury was excused to the jury room, and White was handcuffed and removed from the courtroom to the holding cell. It is to be noted that defense counsel failed to make an objection to the prosecutor’s statement and in fact, twice refused an offer by the court to give a curative instruction to the jury. However, he did make a motion for mistrial on the grounds that White was not competent to aid in his defense, which was denied.

The defendant contends that the trial court committed fundamental error in failing to declare a mistrial when the prosecutor made the allegedly improper comment. We do not agree. Under the facts in this case, the remark by the prosecutor was not a comment on the failure of White to take the stand and testify in his own behalf. Rather, it was a remark which was induced, if not invited, by the defendant’s behavior in the courtroom, and it does not warrant reversal.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66129-66130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32906]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act 
(``CAA'')

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United 
States v. Barber & Sons Tobacco Company, d.b.a. Barber & Sons 
Aggregates, Civil Action No. 97-1540-CV-W-2, was lodged on November 25, 
1997, with the United

[[Page 66130]]

States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The 
proposed Consent Decree resolves claims brought by the United States, 
on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency, pursuant to the Clean 
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., arising from Barber & Sons Tobacco 
Company, d.b.a. Barber & Sons Aggregates' (``Barber'') ownership and 
operation of a non-metallic mineral processing plant, specifically a 
limestone quarry, located in Lee's Summit, Missouri.
    The Complaint alleges that Barber is liable for violations of the 
CAA for failure to comply with notice and testing, reporting, and 
permitting requirements. The proposed Consent Decree requires Defendant 
Barber to pay a civil penalty of $300,865. The proposed Consent Decree 
further requires future compliance by Defendant Barber with the CAA, 
regulations promulgated thereunder, and the Missouri State 
Implementation Plan.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree for a period of thirty (30) days from the date 
of this publication. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 
20044, and refer to United States v. Barber & Sons Tobacco Company, 
d.b.a. Barber & Sons Aggregates, DOJ number 90-5-2-1-2119.
    Copies of the proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office 
of the United States Attorney, 1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2300, Kansas 
City, Missouri; and the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 
4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the 
proposed Consent Decree may be obtained by mail or in person from the 
Consent Decree Library. When requesting a copy of the proposed Consent 
Decree, please enclose a check in the amount of $4.00 (25 cents per 
page reproduction costs) payable to the ``Consent Decree Library.''
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-32906 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 44182.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
----

**Exhibit        32.2**

| (1)    | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |

|   | /s/                  Robert Scott Lorimer |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | ROBERT                  SCOTT LORIMER     |   |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer  |   |
|   | March                  31, 2006           |   |
#### COLEMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. Earl GARNER et al., Appellees.

No. 73-977.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 13, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-261-000]


Florida Power Corporation; Notice of Filing

November 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 23, 1997, Florida Power Corporation 
(FPC), tendered for filing three separate service agreement between FPC 
and US Gen Power Services, L.P., Illinois Power Company and NP Energy, 
Inc., for service under FPC's Market-Based Wholesale Power Sales Tariff 
(MR-1), FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume Number 8. This tariff was 
accepted for filing by the Commission on June 26, 1997, in Docket No. 
ER97-2846-000. The service agreement was US Gen Power Services, L.P., 
is proposed to be effective October 8, 1997, the service agreement with 
Illinois Power Company is proposed to be effective October 14, 1997, 
and the service agreement was NP Energy, Inc., is proposed to be 
effective October 17, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before November 28, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30744 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Sylvia G. FIERMAN and Jules Fierman, Appellants, v. Sheldon ZANE, M.D., Appellee.

No. 70-363.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee for the Hugoton Royalty Trust: We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-81849 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2009, with respect to the statements of assets, liabilities, and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Hugoton Royalty Trust. KPMG LLP Fort Worth, Texas February 25, 2009
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

ASSISTANT SECRETARY

For Legislative Affairs

July 28, 2023

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy

Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Speaker:

Title 5 of the United States Code requires the Secretary of the Treasury to report to 

Congress on the operation and status of certain fund accounts during any debt issuance 

suspension period. 

Enclosed is the report covering the operation and status of relevant fund accounts during 

the most recent debt issuance suspension period. As directed by law and explained in the 

report, Treasury has fully restored the federal fund accounts to the condition that they 

would have been in had there not been a debt issuance suspension period.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Davidson

Assistant Secretary

Office of Legislative Affairs

Enclosure

Identical letter sent to:

The Honorable Hakeem Jeffries, House Democratic Leader

The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Majority Leader

The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican Leader

cc: The Honorable Jason Smith, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means

The Honorable Richard E. Neal , Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways

and Means

The Honorable Ron Wyden, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance

The Honorable Mike Crapo, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS • 1500 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. • WASHINGTON, D.C. • 20220 • 

FOR RELEASE AT 3 p.m. Contact: Jon Murchinson

July 31, 1995 (202) 622-2960

TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET BORROWING 

ESTIMATES

The Treasury Department announced on Monday that its net market 

borrowing for the July - September 1995 quarter is estimated to be $26 billion, 

with a cash balance of $30 billion on September 30. The Treasury also announced 

that its net market borrowing for the October - December 1995 quarter is 

estimated to be in the range of $60 billion to $65 billion, with a cash balance of 

$20 billion on December 31. These estimates do not include new cash to be raised 

in the December 2-year and 5-year notes, which will be issued on January 2, 

1996.

In the quarterly announcement of its borrowing needs on May 1, 1995, the 

Treasury estimated net market borrowing for the July - September quarter to 

be $40 billion to $45 billion, assuming a $30 billion cash balance on 

September 30. The decrease in the borrowing estimate is primarily the result of 

a higher cash balance on June 30.

Actual net market borrowing in the April - June quarter was $25.3 billion, while 

the end-of-quarter cash balance was $60.5 billion. On May 1, the Treasury had 

estimated net market borrowing for the April - June quarter to be $25.8 billion, with 

a $45 billion cash balance on June 30. Higher tax receipts and FCC spectrum license 

sales proceeds accounted for the higher end-of-June cash balance.

The regular quarterly Press Conference will be held at 1:00 p. m. on 

Wednesday, August 2, 1995.

RR-496
#### MONTMARTYRE, INC. v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH (2 cases).

Nos. 37955, 37956.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 10, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### Larry R. FORD, Appellant, v. BARNACLE BILL’S SEAFOOD GALLEY, INC., Appellee.

No. EE-6.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Dennis A. Barbarisi, Fort Walton Beach, for appellant.

C. LeDon Anchors of Estergren, Fortune, Anchors & Powell, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ford’s appeal seeks review of a final judgment for damages in favor of Barnacle Bill, appellant’s tenant, resulting from delay caused by Ford in repairing the leased premises following storm damage. Having considered the errors alleged by appellant pertaining to the admission of appellee’s exhibits, denying appellant’s motion for new trial and motion for remittitur, and the admission into evidence of appellant’s exhibit, we find no error.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
#### Gordon Lee LANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 16, 1970.

Gordon Lee Landers, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed. Grainger v. State (Fla.App. 1st, 1970) 237 So.2d 132; Brown v. State, 232 So.2d 55 (Fla.App. 4th, 1970).

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
C 

Interim Decision #1498 

MATTER OF SPARNAliN 

Application for Extension. of Nonimmigrant Stay 

A-14444036 

Decided by Acting District Director August 19, 196'5 

A six-month,extension of stay in order to .complete -his visits to Westinghouse 

facilities on technical and administrative matters is granted a nonimmigrant 

visitor for business who is employed as a thermodynamics engineer in West 

Germany by a firm associated with Westinghouse Metric Corporation, whose 

means of support while in the United States is his salary from his employer, and who has maintained his nonimmigrant status since entry, and is 

holder of a passport valid to a date more than one year hence. 

The subject is a thirty-two-year-old native and citizen of Germany. 

He is employed as a thermodynamics engineer by Siemens-Schuckertwerke A. G., Muelheim, West Germany. He was admitted to the 

United States on February 20, 1965, as a. nonimmigrant -visitor for 

business. His authorized period of stay will expire on August 20, 

1965. 

The subject has requested a six-month extension of temporary stay 

in order that he may continue visiting the offices, shops, and laboratories of the Westinghouse Electric Corporation. this means of support while in the United States is his salary from his employer in 

Germany. A letter in support of the application from the Westinghouse Electric Corporation confirms that the applicant is an emPloyee 

of Siemens-Schuckertwerke A.G.; that he has been visiting WestinghOuse facilities on technical and administrative matters; and that he 

does not receive any remuneration from the Westinghouse Electric 

Corporation. The letter further shows that the applicant's employer 

is associated with Westinghouse, and is licensed to buildoquipment in 

Germany to Westinghouse designs and patents; and that the applicant will require approximately six more months to -complete his visits to the Westinghouse facilities. 

The applicant is the holder of a German passport valid to July 31, 

1967. He ryas admitted as a. nonimmigrant visitor for business, and 

has .continued to maintain his noninunigrant status. He requires 

285 
Interim Decision *1498 

approximately six additional months to accomplish the purpose for 

which he came to this country. All requirements having been met, 

the application will be granted. 

ORDER: It is ordered that the applicant be granted an extension 

of temporary stay as a nonimmigrant visitor for business to February 

19, 1966. 

286