alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the General Counsel

 

 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UPDATED FOIA STATUS REPORT

JULY 2008

1. FOIA Improvement Plan area to which this deficient milestone relates.

Training. The agency was deficient in meeting some of its goals with respect to training

all agency staff.

2. Deficient milestone and the original target date from the FOIA Improvement

Plan.

The agency milestone was to complete training all headquarters staff by April 30, 2007

and all regional office staff by June 15.

3. Steps taken to correct the deficiency and the dates by which the steps were

completed.

Although we did not meet the milestone dates for training all agency staff, we took

several steps to ensure that training materials were provided to all staff. First, the chief FOIA

officer distributed a memo to all staff that detailed staff obligations under the FOIA and provided

detailed instructions about how to respond to FOIA requests. Second, as noted in the agency’s

2007 Annual Report, we provided in-person training to a subset of agency staff, including those

who have the most contact with FOIA requests, and that practice has continued. Third, all new

professionals attend a training seminar; and the Office of General Counsel provides basic FOIA

training at the seminar. Fourth, we created an intranet website with relevant materials available

to all staff that provides guidance on FOIA obligations and procedures. Finally, we have hired

additional employees; and by the end of the year the FOIA office will be fully staffed. In

addition, we have hired a coordinator to review routine FOIA requests and assist in

administrative matters which will allow senior staff to devote time for training. Thus, while the

training objective has not been fully met, we believe that the training and efforts which have

occurred have continued to result in a decrease in agency staff response times for addressing

FOIA requests.

4. Future remedial steps and the dates by which the steps will be completed.

We are currently working with representatives throughout the agency to determine the

best method for providing training to all employees. We anticipate completing this process by

February 1, 2009.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ELBERT L. HATTEN, JR.,

Petitioner

v.

J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 214 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Walter Milton READ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 29, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Russell H. McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 11.0 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED
(in thousands of dollars or shares except per share amounts)
Twelve Weeks Ended April 28, 2001 and April 29, 2000
<CAPTION>
                                             Twelve Weeks Ended
                                             -------------------
                                             April 28, April 29,
                                               2001       2000
                                             --------- ---------
<S>                                           <C>       <C>
Diluted:
  Net earnings applicable to common shares    $    41   $  2,180
                                              ========  =========
Shares:
  Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding                                 17,932     17,820
  Shares issuable under employee stock plans -
   weighted average                                37         31
  Dilutive effect of exercise of certain stock
   options                                        102        206
  Less:  Treasury stock - weighted average    (10,242)    (9,587)
                                              --------    -------
  Weighted average number of common and
   common equivalent shares outstanding         7,829      8,470
                                              ========    =======
Net earnings per common and common equivalent
  shares                                      $  0.01     $ 0.26
                                              ========    =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE-BASIC
(in thousands of dollars and shares except per share amounts)
Twelve Weeks Ended April 28, 2001 and April 29, 2000
<CAPTION>
                                             Twelve Weeks Ended
                                             -------------------
                                             April 28, April 29,
                                               2001       2000
                                             --------- ---------
<S>                                          <C>       <C>
Basic:
  Net earnings applicable to common shares   $    41   $  2,180
                                             ========  =========
Shares:
  Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding                                17,932     17,820
  Less:  Treasury stock - weighted average   (10,242)    (9,587)
                                             --------    -------
  Weighted average number of common and
   common equivalent shares outstanding        7,690      8,233
                                             ========    =======
Net earnings per common and common equivalent
 shares                                      $  0.01     $ 0.26
                                             ========    =======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in this Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31,
2001, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements No. 33-
43329, No. 33-70108, No. 333-21063, No. 333-51211, No. 333-51217,
No. 333-51231, No. 333-87899, No. 333-70774 and No. 333-70780 on Form S-8, and
Registration Statement No. 333-16231 and No. 333-46580 on Form S-3.

/s/ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Houston, Texas
March 29, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33873]



[[Page 67924]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION


OMB Approval of Agency Information Collection Activity; 
Termination of Single Employer Plans; Missing Participants; PBGC Forms 
500-501, 600-602; Payment of Premiums; PBGC Form 1-ES and PBGC Form 1 
(Including Schedule A)

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of OMB approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Office of Management and Budget 
has extended its approval of the collections of information contained 
in the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's regulations on 
Termination of Single Employer Plans, Missing Participants, and Payment 
of Premiums and implementing forms and instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harold J. Ashner, Assistant General 
Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005-4026, 202-326-4024. (For TTY/TDD, call the Federal 
relay service at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-
4024.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB has extended its approval through 
December 31, 2000, under OMB control number 1212-0036, of the 
collection of information requirements contained in (1) the PBGC's new 
regulations on Termination of Single Employer Plans and Missing 
Participants, 29 CFR Parts 4041 and 4050 (62 FR 60424, November 7, 
1997) and implementing forms and instructions (PBGC Forms 500-501 and 
600-602), and (2) the PBGC's existing regulations on Termination of 
Single Employer Plans and Missing Participants and implementing forms 
and instructions.
    OMB also has extended its approval through December 31, 2000, under 
OMB control number 1212-0009, of the collection of information 
requirements contained in the PBGC's regulation on Payment of Premiums, 
29 CFR Part 4007, and implementing forms and instructions (PBGC Form 1-
ES and PBGC Form 1 (including Schedule A).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. this 22nd day of December, 1997.
David M. Strauss,
Executive Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 97-33873 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7708-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Transatlantic
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven S. Skalicky, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ STEVEN S. SKALICKY Steven S. Skalicky Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
February 24, 2010

The
foregoing is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of this
the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-067-7122-6606; CACA-35511]


Environmental Impact Statement; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for the Imperial 
Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Imperial Project 
Proposed Gold Mining/Processing Operation, Imperial County.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the comment period of the joint 
Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Impact Report (DEIS/EIR) prepared 
by the Bureau of Land Management and the County of Imperial for an 
additional 30-days.

DATES: Written comments must be postmarked no later than February 26, 
1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Area Manager, 
Attn: Imperial Project, El Centro Resource Area, 1661 South Fourth St., 
El Centro, California 92243.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Romoli (909) 697-5237.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The end of comment period as noted in the 
Draft EIS/EIR for the Imperial Project DEIS/EIR was January 27, 1998. 
The comment period is now extended to February 26, 1998.

    Dated: December 19, 1997.
Thomas F. Zale,
Acting Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-33669 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 20

                                                             Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
           AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                (Unaudited)


<CAPTION>
                                                    Nine Months Ended  
                                                      September 30,    
                                                   1998          1997  
                                                 (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                              <C>           <C>
Earnings:

  Income before provision for income   
    taxes                                        $226,137      $160,390 
  Interest expense (including $23,221
    for 1997 to fund assets held for
    sale)                                         368,883       358,129
  Implicit interest in rents                        8,543        10,102

Total earnings                                   $603,563      $528,621

Fixed charges:

  Interest expense (including $23,221
    for 1997 to fund assets held for
    sale)                                        $368,883      $358,129
  Implicit interest in rents                        8,543        10,102

Total fixed charges                              $377,426      $368,231


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   1.60          1.44
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerardo LICEA-LUCERO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 00-50491.

D.C. No. CR-00-00556-JNK.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submission Deferred May 22, 2001.

Submitted Aug. 16, 2002 *.

Decided Aug. 16, 2002.

Before D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gerardo Licea-Lucero appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. We have jurisdiction and we affirm.

Licea-Lucero’s contention that *Appren-di v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), renders 21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional is foreclosed by *United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, 563-68 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc).

Licea-Lucero’s argument that *Apprendi*applies to mandatory mínimums is foreclosed by *Harris v. United States,*- U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 2419-20, 2420-21, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002). His argument that the government must prove that he knew the type and quantity of the drug he possessed is foreclosed by *United States v. Carranza,*289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir.2002).

Licea-Lucero argues in his reply brief that his sentence violated *Apprendi*by raising the penalty beyond the prescribed maximum under 18 U.S.C. § 3583. This claim was not raised in his opening brief and has thus been waived. *See Paciulan v. George,*229 F.3d 1226, 1230 (9th Cir. 2000). In any event, his sentence did not violate § 3583. *See United States v. Garcia,*112 F.3d 395, 398 (9th Cir.1997).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000315256
<NAME>PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                1,695,869
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 27,883
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                     385,444
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   757,190
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,866,386
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  424,097
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                        174,385
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             598,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       75,000
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       516,485
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              170,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                   25,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                774,829
<LEASES-CURRENT>                           127,909
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             578,680
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>            2,866,386
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  261,745
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                        18,652
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 227,494
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 242,920
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     18,825
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           4,068
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              19,667
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    12,820
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,847
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  2,650
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                4,197
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      81,476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        




</TABLE>
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2571 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To include Portugal in the list of foreign states whose nationals are eligible for admission into the United States 

as E–1 and E–2 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the Government of Portugal 

and to otherwise modify the eligibility criteria for E 

visas. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2571 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advancing Mutual In5 terests and Growing Our Success Act’’ or the ‘‘AMIGOS 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS. 

8 For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 

9 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

10 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), Portugal shall be considered to 

11 be a foreign state described in such section if the Govern12 ment of Portugal provides similar nonimmigrant status to 

13 nationals of the United States. 

14 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR E 

15 VISAS. 

16 Section 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Na17 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)) is amended— 

18 (1) in the matter preceding clause (i)— 

19 (A) by inserting ‘‘(or, in the case of an 

20 alien who acquired the relevant nationality 

21 through a financial investment and who has not 

22 previously been granted status under this sub23 paragraph, the foreign state of which the alien 

24 is a national and in which the alien has been 

25 domiciled for a continuous period of not less 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2571 RFS

1 than 3 years at any point before applying for 

2 a nonimmigrant visa under this subparagraph)’’ 

3 before ‘‘, and the spouse’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘him’’ and inserting ‘‘such 

5 alien’’; and 

6 (2) by striking ‘‘he’’ each place such term ap7 pears and inserting ‘‘the alien’’. 

8 SEC. 4. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

9 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

10 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

11 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

12 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

13 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

14 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro15 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

16 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

WORKSHOP ON STANDARDS FOR CLOTHES WASHERS 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20585 

(Rm. lE-245) 

December 14 - 15, 1998 

Workshop Purpose: The Department is interested in receiving comments and data to 

improve its preliminary analysis. In particular, the Department is 

interested in seeking responses to the questions and/or concerns that 

were addressed in the Supplemental ANOPR. The Department also 

seeks comments on the methodologies and analyses to be conducted 

for the NOPR. 

Workshop Outcomes: To receive comments on the Supplemental ANOPR and receive 

comments on analyses to be conducted for the NOPR. 

Proposed Agenda 

December 14 

. 1 :00 - 4:00 GRIM Training Session 

December 15 

9:00 - 9: 15 Introduction and Review Agenda 

9: 15 - 9:30 Opening remarks and overview of the clothes washer rulemaking schedule 

Break (as appropriate) 

9:30 - 11 :30 Comments and questions pertaining to the Supplemental ANOPR. Suggested 

topics include the following: 

.,. Proposed product classes for products . 

.,. Information on national level historical, current, and projections of water and 

sewer rates . 

.,. Information relating to the determination of price and operating cost 

elasticities . 

.,. Comments on the proposed DOE approach for determining shipments. 
\ 

11 :30 - 12:00 

12:00 - 1:00 

1:00 - 4:00 

1 :00 - 1:30 

1:30 - 2:00 

2:00 - 2:30 

2:30 - 2:45 

2:45 - 3:30 

3:30 - 4:00 

4:00 - 4:30 

-continuedU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

WORKSHOP ON ST AND ARDS FOR CLOTHES WASHERS 

... Comments on the alternative standard scenarios: 

• The following are examples of possible alternative standards scenarios for 

consideration by the Department: 

• A moderate standard at an early effective date. For example, a level at a 

25 percent improvement, effective three years after the publication of the 

Final Rule. 

• A stringent standard, at a later effective date. For example, a level at 

45 percent improvement effective five years after the publication of the 

Final Rule. 

• A two phase approach. For example, a level at 20 percent effective 

three years after the publication of the Final Rule (projected effective date 

- October, 2002) and a level at 40 percent effective eight years after 

publication of the Final Rule. 

... Other comments ( e.g., savings from detergent, additional information on the 

cost of units at the 40% and 45%, retail markup, tub capacity, quality of data, 

accounting for maintenance, repair and warranty costs in life-cycle-costs, 

"life" of appliance used in life-cycle-cost calculation and the use of the 

AE099 forecast in the analysis) 

Results of Reverse Engineering: Phase II 

Lunch (On Your Own) 

Presentation of NOPR analyses 

... Marginal energy and water rates 

... National Energy Savings - approaches to determine shipment and elasticity 

... Consumer Survey - update 

Break 

... Manufacturer Impact Analysis 

"' Indirect Employment 

Environmental Assessment 

Utility Impact Analysis 

Summary Discussion and Adjournment