alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Darrel Lee HARIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOEING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-35960.

D.C. No. CV-00-01685-RSL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 19, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Darrel Lee Harig appeals the district court’s summary judgment in his action alleging wrongfiil termination in violation of the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601-2654 et seq. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Barnett v. Centoni*31 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir. 1994), and we affirm.

It is undisputed that Boeing terminated Harig for unexcused absences, and four days later refused to reinstate him because Boeing learned Harig made death threats against a co-worker.

The district court properly concluded that Boeing had good cause to not reinstate Harig once it learned of the death threats he made against a co-worker. Harig presented no evidence that Boeing discriminated or retaliated against him on the basis of FMLA leave. *See*29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2). Therefore, the district court properly granted summary judgment to defendant on Harig’s 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2) claim.

The district court also properly determined that Harig did not set forth evidence sufficient to recover damages under the FMLA. *See*29 U.S.C. §§ 2615 and 2617.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *852courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.01


                    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications


I, Kenneth E. Steben, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Futures Portfolio Fund Limited
Partnership.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
     to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
     its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
     most recent fiscal quarter ( the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
     the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
     reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and


<PAGE>



     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 29, 2005

/s/ Kenneth E. Steben
-----------------------
By:
Kenneth E. Steben
President of the General Partner
(Principal Executive Officer)



                                      2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 3, 2021

No. 04-20-00146-CV

The Most Reverend Wm. Michael MULVEY, S.T.L., D.D. Bishop of Corpus Christi 

(Appellant/Cross-Appellee),

Appellant

v.

BAY, LTD. (Appellee/Cross-Appellant),

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-09-51494-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Appellee/cross-appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration En Banc is 

pending before the court. The court hereby requests a response to the motion from the 

appellants/cross-appellees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.2. Any response must be filed in this court no 

later than ten days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on November 3, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11



                HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Years ended October 31,
                                                             ---------------------------------------------
                                                                   2000              1999             1998
                                                             ----------           -------          -------
<S>                                                          <C>                  <C>              <C>
Numerator:
  Net income (loss)                                          $  (25,426)          $ 7,483          $ 6,088
                                                             ==========           =======          =======

Denominator:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding                     17,467            17,357           17,366
  Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the
    Treasury stock method using average market price               - (a)               62              467
                                                             ----------           -------          -------
Weighted average common shares and common
  share equivalents                                              17,467            17,419           17,833
                                                             ==========           =======          =======


Basic earnings (loss) per share:                             $    (1.46)          $  0.43          $  0.35
                                                             ==========           =======          =======

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:                           $    (1.46)          $  0.43          $  0.34
                                                             ==========           =======          =======
</TABLE>



(a) Stock options would be anti-dilutive for fiscal year 2000 and are therefore
excluded from the denominator.
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 21

                                                             Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
           AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                (Unaudited)


<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended  
                                                        March 31,      
                                                   1999          1998  
                                                 (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                              <C>           <C>
Earnings:
  Income before provision for income   
    taxes                                        $ 82,730      $ 73,808 
  Interest expense                                135,306       119,304
  Implicit interest in rents                        3,810         2,918

Total earnings                                   $221,846      $196,030


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                               $135,306      $119,304
  Implicit interest in rents                        3,810         2,918

Total fixed charges                              $139,116      $122,222


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   1.59          1.60
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
#### Kitti F. WESTFALL, Appellant, v. NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 70-487.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 24, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00134

- CV

H.L. ZUMWALT CONSTRUCTION, INC.

,

Appellant

v.

ROAD REPAIR, LLC

, Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVQ00279 1D2 Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due on April 7, 2020. On March 25, 2020 , court
reporter Vincente Mendoza filed a notification of late record, notifying this court that the reporter’s record has not been filed because: (1) appellant has failed to request the record, and (2) appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for prepari ng the

record.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that appellant has requested the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record, which request must designate the por tions of the proceedings and the exhibits

to be included. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(b)(1).

It is further ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

The reporter’s record must be filed no later than t hirty ( 3 0) days after the date appellant’s written proofs are filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date the clerk’s record is filed, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c)._________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav e hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
#### Sandsbury LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 70-749, 70-622.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JULY 15, 2014

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD76580 Kevin Williams vs. State of Missouri

WD76904 In the Interest of: A.L.S. vs. Juvenile Officer

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

----------------------------------------------------------------

None
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2617 

AN ACT 

To amend section 1115 of title 31, United States Code, 

to amend the description of how performance goals are 

achieved, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2617 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Performance Enhance3 ment Reform Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

5 Section 1115 of title 31, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by amending subsection (b)(5) to read as 

8 follows: 

9 ‘‘(5) provide a description of how the perform10 ance goals are to be achieved, including— 

11 ‘‘(A) the human capital, training, data and 

12 evidence, information technology, and skill sets 

13 required to meet the performance goals; 

14 ‘‘(B) the technology modernization invest15 ments, system upgrades, staff technology skills 

16 and expertise, stakeholder input and feedback, 

17 and other resources and strategies needed and 

18 required to meet the performance goals; 

19 ‘‘(C) clearly defined milestones; 

20 ‘‘(D) an identification of the organizations, 

21 program activities, regulations, policies, oper22 ational processes, and other activities that con23 tribute to each performance goal, both within 

24 and external to the agency; 

25 ‘‘(E) a description of how the agency is 

26 working with other agencies and the organiza-
3 

•HR 2617 EH

1 tions identified in subparagraph (D) to measure 

2 and achieve its performance goals as well as rel3 evant Federal Government performance goals; 

4 and 

5 ‘‘(F) an identification of the agency offi6 cials responsible for the achievement of each 

7 performance goal, who shall be known as goal 

8 leaders;’’; and 

9 (2) by amending subsection (g) to read as fol10 lows: 

11 ‘‘(g) PREPARATION OF PERFORMANCE PLAN.—The 

12 Chief Performance Improvement Office (or the functional 

13 equivalent) shall collaborate with the Chief Human Cap14 ital Officer (or the functional equivalent), the Chief Infor15 mation Officer (or the functional equivalent), the Chief 

16 Data Officer (or the functional equivalent), and the Chief 

17 Financial Officer (or the functional equivalent) to prepare 

18 that portion of the annual performance plan described 

19 under subsection (b)(5).’’. 

20 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

21 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

22 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, 

23 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

24 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

25 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 
4 

•HR 2617 EH

1 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro2 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

3 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2617 

AN ACT 

To amend section 1115 of title 31, United States 

ance goals are achieved, and for other purposes. Code, to amend the description of how perform-
#### PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-827.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 29, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130756 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROSIA MITCHELL-CRENSHAW, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Successor Personal Representative Justices of the Estate of Floyd L. Mitchell,

Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130756 

 COA: 263057 

Oakland CC: 2004-060421-NH 

LONNIE JOE, JR., M.D., and

PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL AND 

MEDICAL CENTER,

 Defendants, 

and 

BERNARD KOLE, M.D.,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of October 17, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 

2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Braverman v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-6). On order of the Court, the 

case having been decided on April 9, 2008, 480 Mich 1159 (2008), the application is 

again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 13.1



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
Prime Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2012 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







|Date: May 14, 2013 |     |                                     
|------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------
|                   | By: | /s/ Diana Chia-Huei Liu             
|                   |     | Diana Chia-Huei Liu                 
|                   |     | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                   |     | (Principal Executive Officer)       





|Date: May 14, 2013 |     |                                             
|------------------ | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                   | By: | /s/ William Tsu-Cheng Yu                    
|                   |     | William Tsu-Cheng Yu                        
|                   |     | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                   |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Committee Name: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and 
Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: January 6, 1997.
    Place: Natcher Building, Room 6AS-25F, National Institutes of 
Health, 45, Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6600.
    Contact Person: Lakshmanan Sankaran, Ph. D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Natcher Building, Room 6AS-25F, National Institutes 
of Health, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6600; Phone: 
301-594-7799.
    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate a research grant 
application.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Application and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.847-849, 
Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition; and Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, 
National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: December 26, 1996.
Margery G. Grubb,
Senior Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-319 Filed 1-2-97; 4:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66382-66383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration

[[Page 66383]]

(SAMHSA) will publish a list of information collection requests under 
OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA 
Reports Clearance Officer on (301) 443-8005.
    Proposed Project: 1998 Inventory of Mental Health Services in 
Juvenile Justice Facilities--New--This survey will gather information 
for the first time about the availability of mental health services in 
the universe of approximately 3,100 juvenile justice facilities 
nationwide. State and national information will be collected about the 
organization of mental health services, characteristics of youth 
receiving these services, and mental health staffing patterns and 
costs.
    The total annual burden estimate is shown below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            Number of     Average       Total   
                                                               Number of    responses    burden per     annual  
                                                              respondents      per        response      burden  
                                                                            respondent    (hours)      (hours)  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Juvenile Justice Facilities.................................        3,100            1          1.5        4,650
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: 
Daniel J. Chenok, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office 
of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10236, 
Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: December 12, 1997.
Richard Kopanda,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 97-33012 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-U
o/a-/5

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 05-09-01368-CR OFFENSE: MURDER

Hall, John Edward v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY:

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT:

DATE: 04/11/2011 Publish: NO TC CASE #:

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Hall, John Edward v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: OIZ-15

Pf?0 &?_ Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

t£fi>seb JUDGE:

DATE: n^\w9€>l9

JUDGE: A. UvU^-

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD