alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 250 (Thursday, December 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 81918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33476]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2011-HA-0033]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
30, 2012.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: ACAM2000[reg] Myopericarditis 
Registry; OMB Control Number 0720-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 20.
    Responses per Respondent: 2.
    Annual Responses: 40.
    Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 20 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The Food and Drug Administration required the 
establishment of several Phase IV post licensure studies to evaluate 
the long term safety of ACAM2000[reg] smallpox vaccine. Among the 
required post licensure studies is the establishment of a 
myopericarditis registry. The ACAM2000[reg] Myopericarditis Registry is 
designed to study the natural history of myopericarditis following 
receipt of the ACAM2000[reg] vaccine, including evaluating factors that 
may influence disease prognosis, thus addressing the FDA post-licensure 
requirement and ensuring the continued licensing of this vaccine.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: Semi-annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09, 
Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: December 23, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-33476 Filed 12-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
TREASURY NEWS

Department of the Treasury Washington, D.C. Telephone 202-622-2960

FOR RELEASE AT 3:00 p.m. Contact: Michelle Smith

May 3, 1993 (202) 622-2960

TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET BORROWING ESTIMATES

The Treasury Department today announced that its net 

market borrowing for the April-June 1993 quarter is estimated 

to be $37 billion, with a $35 billion cash balance on June 30. 

The Treasury also announced that its net market borrowing for 

the July-September 1993 quarter is estimated to be in a range 

of $90 billion to $95 billion, with a $40 billion cash balance 

at the end of September. Beginning with the July-September 

quarter, the borrowing estimates include significant outlays --

primarily for working capital -- for the Resolution Trust 

Corporation, based on both the freeing up of unallocated loss 

reserves for resolution purposes and the outlook for RTC 

funding legislation.

In the quarterly announcement of its borrowing needs on 

February 3, 1993, the Treasury estimated net market borrowing 

during the April-June 1993 quarter to be in a range of $25 

billion to $30 billion, assuming a $35 billion cash balance 

on June 30. The current higher borrowing estimate reflects a 

lower estimate of individual income tax receipts during the 

April-June period.

Actual market borrowing in the quarter ended March 31, 

1993, was $53.0 billion, while the end-of-quarter cash balance 

was $21.6 billion. On February 3, the Treasury had estimated 

market borrowing for the January-March quarter to be $67 

billion, with a $20 billion cash balance on March 31. A 

reduction in the cash deficit as a result of higher receipts 

and lower outlays accounted for the reduction in market 

borrowing.

LB-155
#### Louvenia M. SHELFER, Appellant, v. Bennett H. SHELFER, Appellee.

No. 71-354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 15, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1971.

Wilson, Burns & Browd, Miami, for appellant.

James O. Nelson, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of rule stated in Mehaffey v. Mehaffey, 143 Fla. 157, 196 So. 416 (1940).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
E. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant
to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company for the period covered by the Report.


                                           /s/ Kenneth E. Wolf
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kenneth E. Wolf
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                           August 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by Phoenix
Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                       18
Taylor Blom

Front Door Photo

4717 West Terry circle

Holland, MI. 49424

I was going to attach the Manual for the DJI Inspire 1 and the DJI Phantom 2 Vision but the file size was 

too large to send so I am send a link for both sUAV and hope that this will be acceptable. The Flight 

Manual for each is listed under downloads.

DJI Inspire 1:

http://www.dji.com/product/inspire-1

DJI Phantom 2 Vision:

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2-vision-plus

Sincerely:

Taylor Blom
#### CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, etc., Petitioner, v. NEW PRODUCTS CORP., etc., Respondent.

No. 40676.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 9, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 241 So.2d 451.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Franklyn LEVENSON, Respondent.

No. 42995.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 13, 1972.

Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar.

J. Ben Watkins, of Watkins & Hill, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CUÍIIAM.

Respondent Franklyn Levenson petitions us for reinstatement to the practice of law, from which he was suspended in 1968 by order of this Court reported in Florida Bar v. Levenson, Fla., 211 So.2d 173.

Thereafter in 1971 Respondent petitioned us for reinstatement to the practice of law after his conviction of a Federal offense was reversed by the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. We declined to reinstate but acceded to The Florida Bar’s suggestion that a referee be appointed to determine from an evidentiary hearing Respondent’s fitness to practice law.

See The Florida Bar v. Levenson, Fla., 252 So.2d 794.

Pursuant to our action reported in 252 So.2d 794, The Florida Bar appointed a referee to hold the evidentiary hearing.

Such hearing has been held. The Referee’s report narrates the gist of the evidence adduced before him. Based on the pleadings, exhibits and evidence as reflected in his report, the Referee makes the following findings and recommendations:

> “1. The respondent’s explanation of the charges against him and his non-complicity is plausible and worthy of belief. The preponderance of evidence is in favor of the respondent.

> *128
>       *“2.*Respondent failed to testify in the Federal trial wherein he was one of many defendants charged with conspiracy. The explanation offered was that his refusal to testify was on advice of counsel in the face of threats by other defendants of retaliation.

> “3. There is no evidence that respondent personally profited in any way from the fraud visited upon the Five Points Bank. The evidence is to the contrary. It appears that respondent was himself the victim of fraud by his alleged conspirators.

> “RECOMMENDATION OF GUILT

> “It is recommended that respondent be found not guilty of the violations charged in the complaint and specifically not guilty of violating Rule 11.02 of Article XI of the Integration Rule and Code of Professional Responsibility, Canon 1, Disciplinary Rules 1-102[A] (4) and (6), 32 F.S.A.

> “RECOMMENDATION OF DISCIPLINE

> “It is recommended that the respondent be reinstated to the Bar of Florida and permitted to practice law in the State of Florida.”

Counsel for The Florida Bar has filed with us the following statement:

> “THE FLORIDA BAR joins in recommending approval of the [Respondent’s] foregoing Petition for Reinstatement.”

The foregoing having been duly considered, it is ordered that Franklyn Levenson be and he is reinstated to the practice of law.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Robert Earl JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 13, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender-, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., WIGGINTON, J. and McLANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.
# UNITED TACONITE FLOW SHEET No. 7: Rev 1 (EXTERNAL)

DRYING 'w'ASTE GAS

- EXHAUST STACK 

# 1

GAS FANSI 

## PELLET PLANT INDURATION AREA LINE #2

PREHEAT

I PREHEAT FANS I COOLER 'w'ASTE GAS STACK

BURNER 

### I**oooooooooooooooooooo~88ooooooo ~**  

### ggggggggggggg ggggggggggggggggg 8o§88go FINAL " -.--:: --.....

### ~ oo 0 o PRODUCT 

# t I I COOLER I
---- 

# t 0 VIERA TING**~** c_FEEDER 

## ( r-0 .,.**~~~SIDE** 

### ("-_____,.--f)**_.,..,o~A ~rR~**  SIDE 

## _/**~/** ,--------------, I CODLING FAN 2 TD PELLET LOADOUT SEE SHEET 8 CODLING FAN 1
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2531 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 

of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide transportation to and 

from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in connection with vocational rehabilitation or counseling. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2021 

Mr. PANETTA (for himself, Mr. LIEU, Mr. FITZPATRICK, and Mr. TAYLOR) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent 

the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 

provide transportation to and from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in connection with vocational rehabilitation or counseling. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Earned 

5 Transportation Act’’ or the ‘‘Vets ETA’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2531 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF VET2 ERANS AFFAIRS TO PROVIDE TRANSPOR3 TATION TO AND FROM DEPARTMENT OF VET4 ERANS AFFAIRS FACILITIES IN CONNECTION 

5 WITH VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OR 

6 COUNSELING. 

7 Section 111A(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘(1) The Secretary’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

11 (2) by striking paragraph (2). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
USING FINANCIAL EDUCATION TO 

EMPOWER STUDENTS FACING 

DANGEROUS FINANCIAL 

DECISIONS

Jeff Webster, Director of Research, TG

FINANCIAL LITERACY AND EDUCATION COMMISSION

FEBRUARY 4, 2016
Life altering decisions are being made

with minimal understanding at a time of maximum distraction.
• Mandated at beginning and end of college

– Timing issues

• While a school responsibility, most steer students 

to U.S. Department of Education’s online tool

– Free, scalable and provides an audit trail

• How well does it work?

BACKGROUND ON STUDENT LOAN 

COUNSELING
• Legislative history 

• Review of research literature

• Observations of borrowers using online tool

• Schools with promising practices

• Policy focused report

TG SERIES OF REPORTS ON LOAN 

COUNSELING
• Rigid statute requires too many topics in too short 

of a time

– About 20 topics covered in 30 minutes

– Well intentioned, gradual accumulation of topics 

actually undermines goal of counseling

• Loan counseling is text-heavy and lacks 

customization

• U.S. Department of Education is making positive 

change

TOP FINDINGS ABOUT BORROWERS’ 

EXPERIENCE
• Prepare students for the online tool so they can:

– Understand the purpose

– Navigate easily

– Get most out of budget tools

• Reframe the income driven repayment option

• Advise based on your expertise

HOW CAN SCHOOLS IMPROVE STUDENTS’ 

EXPERIENCE OF THE ONLINE TOOL?
• Cross train both within team and across 

departments

• Take holistic approach to student’s finances

– Homegrown and third party programs

– Integrate into college experience classes

• Target efforts

– Those most in need of counseling

– Pilot test methods of teaching and reaching

SCHOOLS GOING ABOVE AND BEYOND 

MINIMUM LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
• Market financial education

– Many points of contact, attention grabbers and 

convenient location

• Provide in-person counseling

– Large groups, small groups and individual

• Use peer-to-peer model for advising

– Helps student and the near-peer

• Let the data show you the way

MORE PROMISING PRACTICES EMPLOYED 

BY COLLEGES
Financially vulnerable college students 

can be reached through concerted 

efforts highlighted in a series of 

studies conducted by TG in 

consultation with NASFAA.
Loan counseling reports: 

http://www.tgslc.org/research/counseling.cfm

Jeff Webster

Director of Research, TG

jeff.webster@tgslc.org

(800) 252-9743, ext. 4504

PO Box 83100, Round Rock, TX 78683-3100

www.TG.org

QUESTIONS?
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. Bank of America, N.A., Trustee for Hugoton Royalty Trust February 26, 2008

          By:/s/ Nancy G. WillisNancy G. Willis Vice President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.5.2


          INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO THE AGREEMENT, DATED JANUARY 14, 2000,
    BY AND BETWEEN C AND C CARRIAGE MUSHROOM COMPANY AND QUINCY CORPORATION


1.       Schedules 1(d), 5(a)(i), 5(a)(iii), 5(a)(vi), 5(c), 5(d) and 6.1

2.       Collective Bargaining Agreement between Quincy Corporation and United
         Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO, dated July 20, 1999

3.       Labor Resolution Agreement, dated January 14, 2000, by and among Quincy
         Corporation, and C And C Carriage Mushroom Company

4.       Schedules 7(e)(i), 7(e)(i)(A), 7(e)(i)(B), 7(e)(iii), 7(f)(ii),
         7(f)(v), 7(f)(vi), 7(f)(vii), 8(c), 14, 14(f) and 15(a)

5.       Packaging and Marketing Proposal by C And C Carriage Mushroom Company,
         dated October 13, 1999, to Bob Weatherford, CFO, Quincy Corporation

6.       Bill of Sale, dated January 14, 2000, with respect to the Assets as
         such term is defined in the Agreement

7.       Certificate of President of C And C Carriage Mushroom Company, dated as
         of January 14, 2000, with respect to preambles and resolutions adopted
         by the Board of Directors of C And C Carriage Mushroom Company

8.       Sylvan Foods, Inc. Certified Resolution of the Board of Directors,
         dated as of January 13, 2000

9.       Agreement of Lease, dated as of January 14, 2000, by and between Quincy
         Corporation and C And C Carriage Mushroom Company

10.      Labor Resolution Agreement, dated January 14, 2000, by and between
         Quincy Corporation and C And C Carriage Mushroom Company

11.      Certificate of President of C And C Carriage Mushroom Company, dated
         January 14, 2000, with respect to buyer's compliance with obligations
         and conditions under the Agreement

12.      First refusal letter from C And C Carriage Mushroom Company to Quincy
         Corporation and Sylvan Inc.

13.      Landlord's Release and Waiver Agreement, dated January 27, 2000, by
         Quincy Corporation in favor of Wilmington Trust Company


                                      E-69
Document

Exhibit 10.1

 HYSTER-YALE MATERIALS HANDLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Director Fee Policy (Amended Effective as of July 1, 2021)
			
	




This Director fee policy shall apply to each Director of Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.  (Hyster-Yale) or one of its subsidiaries, other than (i) Directors who are full-time employees of Hyster-Yale or one of its subsidiaries or (ii) Directors who have entered into separate written fee agreements authorized by the Board of Directors and executed by an authorized officer of Hyster-Yale or one of its subsidiaries.

Each Director of Hyster-Yale will receive an annual retainer, of $192,000, payable quarterly in arrears. Each quarterly payment shall consist of $15,500 in cash and $32,500 worth of Hyster-Yale Class A Common Stock, transfer of which is restricted pursuant to the terms of the Hyster-Yale Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation Plan.  


Each Director of Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. who is not a Director of Hyster-Yale will receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $5,000.


Each Chairman of a Committee of the Hyster-Yale Board of Directors will receive an additional annual Committee Chairman’s fee of $10,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $2,500; provided, however, that the Chairman of the Audit Review Committee will receive an annual Committee Chairman’s fee of $15,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $3,750.  100% of all fees paid for service as Chairman of a Committee is attributable to services for Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Each member of a Committee (other than the Executive Committee) of the Hyster-Yale Board of Directors, including Committee Chairmen, will receive an additional annual Committee member’s fee of $7,000 for each Committee on which such Director serves, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $1,750.  100% of all fees paid for service as a member of a Committee is attributable to services for Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Each Director of Hyster-Yale or a Hyster-Yale subsidiary will be paid a meeting fee of (a) $1,000 for each Hyster-Yale or subsidiary Board meeting attended, provided that no Director shall be paid for attendance at more than one Board meeting on any single day, and (b) $1,000 for each Committee meeting attended.  In the case of either joint meeting or joint committee meetings, the fees associated with that meeting will be allocated among the companies that actually met. 


This amended policy is effective as of July 1, 2021. 






Director Fee Policy
 (Effective As of July 1, 2021)
#### J. E. DOVELL v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE.

No. 38392.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 218 So.2d 464.
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-89145, 333-30578, 333-14037, 333-71442, 333-49806, 333-67825, 333-35527,
333-104129, 333-110422, 333-120183, 333-130675 and 33-82894 on Form S-8; No.
333-66934 on Form S-4; and No. 333-112493 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March
6, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule
of BE Aerospace, Inc. and management's report of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of BE Aerospace, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 15, 2006