Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 1997 / Notices 64367

Commission. The project goal is to

retain existing fish and wildlife

resources and, to the extent feasible, the

enhancement thereof. Further, the

ecosystem resulting from

implementation of the plan should be

naturalistic, biologically diverse,

productive, and estuarine in nature.

That is, it shall be predominately salt

water influenced, but incorporate

biologically beneficial freshwater

influences. In addition, the acreage of

waters and wetlands in the lowland

should not be diminished. The

proposed Concept Plan for restoration

would consists of: (1) Acquisition of

approximately 880 acres in the Bolsa

Chica lowlands; (2) restoration of

wetlands and habitat areas in Bolsa

Chica Lowlands, including

approximately 384 acres of full tidal and

220 acres of managed tidal; (3)

monitoring activities to determine the

condition of the restored habitats on a

regular basis and the necessary

operation, maintenance and

management of the project feature and

its associated physical features, both

during and after construction of those

physical features, and (4) necessary

maintenance/management of the

restored wetland. The Concept Plan

involves the dredging of approximately

1.5 million cubic yards of material from

the interior of the wetland, the

construction of a new stabilized tidal

inlet through the existing beach, and

associated bridges as required to

maintain traffic flows through the area.

2. Alternatives

A series of informal public workshops

were held to solicit public input into the

development of preliminary project

alternatives. These preliminary

alternatives conceptually include the

‘‘No Action’’ Scenario; water

management measures; the Concept

Plan, as described above; alternate

scenarios for routing floodwaters from

the existing Garden Grove-Wintersburg

flood control channel through the

project area; alternate locations for a

new tidal inlet; and alternate ways to

restore tidal influence to the wetland

(such as culverts or a non-jettied inlet).

These preliminary project alternatives,

along with the proposed action and the

No Action scenarios, will be screened

down into a series of final alternatives.

These final alternatives will be carried

forward into detailed analyses pursuant

to the National Environmental Policy

Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, as

amended) and the California

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of

1970 (Public Resources Code, Sections

21000–21177).

3. Scoping Process

The Corps, Service and CSLC, on

behalf of all 8 Project Steering

Committee agencies, are preparing a

joint Environmental Impact Statement/

Report (EIS/R) to address potential

impacts associated with implementing

their respective discretionary actions

associated with the proposed project.

The Corps and the Service are the Lead

Federal Agencies for compliance with

NEPA for the project, and the CSLC is

the Lead State Agency for compliance

with the CEQA for the non-Federal

aspects of the project. The Draft EIS/R

(DEIS/R) document will incorporate

public concerns in the analysis of

impacts associated with the Proposed

Action and associated project

alternatives. The DEIS/R will be sent out

for a 45-day public review period,

during which time both written and

verbal comments will be solicited on the

adequacy of the document. The Final

EIS/R (FEIS/R) will address the

comments received on the DEIS/R

during public review, and will be

furnished to all who commented on the

DEIS/R, and is made available to anyone

that requests a copy during the 30-day

public comment period. The final step

involves, for the federal EIS, preparing

a Record of Decision (ROD) and, for the

state EIR, certifying the EIR and

adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and

Reporting Plan. The ROD is a concise

summary of the decisions made by the

Corps and the Service from among the

alternatives presented in the FEIS/R.

The ROD can be published immediately

after the FEIS public comment period

ends. A certified EIR indicates that the

environmental document adequately

assesses the environmental impacts of

the proposed project with respect to

CEQA. A formal scoping meeting to

solicit public comment on the proposed

action and alternatives will be held on

December 11, 1997 at 7:00 P.M., in the

Huntington Beach City Council

Chambers, Huntington Beach,

California.

Dated: November 26, 1997.

Robert L. Davis,

Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Engineer.

[FR Doc. 97–31941 Filed 12–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–KF–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Privacy Act of 1974; System of

Records

AGENCY: Department of the Navy

ACTION: Notice of a System of Records

SUMMARY: An administrative oversight

occurred when a listed change to a

system of records notice published on

November 20, 1997, at 62 FR 62020 was

not incorporated into the notice, as

amended. Therefore, the notice is being

republished in its entirety.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the

Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA

Policy Branch, Chief of Naval

Operations (N09B30), 2000 Navy

Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350–2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.

Doris Lama at (202) 685–6545 or DSN

325–6545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

complete inventory of the Department of

the Navy’s record system notices for

records systems subject to the Privacy

Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended,

have been published in the Federal

Register and are available from the

address above.

An administrative oversight occurred

when a listed change to a system of

records notice published on November

20, 1997, at 62 FR 62020 was not

incorporated into the notice, as

amended. Therefore, the notice is being

republished in its entirety.

Dated: November 28, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

N01752–1

SYSTEM NAME:

Family Advocacy Program System.

SYSTEM LOCATION:

Navy Case Files: Family Service

Center, Family Advocacy Center, and/or

Medical Treatment Facilities at the local

naval activity that services the local

beneficiaries. Official mailing addresses

for naval activities are published as an

appendix to the Department of the

Navy’s compilation of systems of

records notices.

Marine Corps Family Advocacy

Program Records: Marine Corps

installations with a Family Service

Center. Official mailing addresses are

published as an appendix to the

Department of the Navy’s compilation of

records notices.

Navy Central Registry: Commanding

Officer, Naval Medical Management

Information Center, 8901 Wisconsin

Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889–5066.

Marine Corps Central Registry:

Commandant of the Marine Corps;

Head, Family Advocacy Program (MHF25), Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, 2

Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20380–

1775.
64368 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 1997 / Notices

Navy Centralized Child Sexual Abuse

Case Files: Chief of Naval Personnel

(Pers-661), 2 Navy Annex, Washington,

DC 20370–6610.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM:

All beneficiaries entitled to care at

Navy medical and dental facilities

whose abuse or neglect is brought to the

attention of appropriate authorities.

All beneficiaries reported for abusing

or neglecting such victims.

Victims/offenders not associated with

the Department of the Navy and who are

not generally entitled to care at Navy

medical and dental facilities.

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

Navy Family Advocacy Case Files:

(a) Victim’s file consists of risk

assessment which includes the

following forms: incident report,

eligibility decision, demographics,

safety assessment, safety response, risk

focused assessment reports (DOMAINS

I, II, IV, V, VI, VII), risk assessment

matrix, risk assessment summary, risk

assessment findings, intervention plan,

and Case Review Committee

presentation; video/audio tapes of

contact with victim; case notes about

victim; Family Advocacy Program

generated correspondence regarding

abuse or neglect of victim; Original copy

of DD Form 2486; Privacy Act Statement

signed by victim; contacts with children

who are not victims of abuse or neglect,

and other supporting data assembled

relevant to the abuse or neglect and

generated by FAP staff that are specific

to the victim.

(b) Offender’s file consists of

assessment with offender;

demographics; video-audio tapes of

contacts with offender; case notes on

contacts with offender; case notes about

offender; risk focused assessment report

DOMAIN III (alleged offender

characteristics); Family Advocacy

Program (FAP) generated

correspondence regarding offender;

Privacy Act Statement signed by

offender; and other supporting data

assembled relevant to the abuse or

neglect and generated by the FAP staff

that are specific to the offender.

(c) Documentation generated outside

of the Family Advocacy Program (Naval

Criminal Investigative Service reports;

local police reports; Base Security

Incident Complaint Reports; psychiatric

and substance abuse evaluations;

treatment reports; copies of pertinent

medical entries; Child Protective

Service reports; shelter reports;

photographs; correspondence generated

outside the Family Advocacy Program;

and other supporting data assembled

relevant to the abuse or neglect and

generated outside the FAP that are

specific to either the victim(s) or

offender(s) (e.g., Military Protective

Orders, barring letters, and civilian

temporary restraining orders) are

maintained in a separate folder and are

retrieved by case number.

Marine Corps Program Family

Advocacy Program Files:

(a) Victim’s file consists of client’s

fact sheet (demographics); Privacy Act

Statement signed by victim; Limits of

Privacy Statement signed by victim;

initial assessment; CRC Case

Assessment with risk assessment;

audio/video tapes of contact with

victim; safety plan; notes on collateral

contacts about victim; case notes; CRC

case status determination; CRC

generated correspondence; Command’s

Case disposition and recommendation

approval letter; original copy of DD

Form 2486 and other relevant

supporting data generated by the FAP

staff that is specific to the victim.

(b) Offender’s file consists of client’s

fact sheet (demographics); Privacy Act

Statement signed by offender; Limits of

Privacy Statement signed by offender;

initial assessment; CRC Case

Assessment; audio/video tapes of

contacts with offender; case notes on

collateral contacts regarding offender;

case notes; CRC case status

determination; CRC generated

correspondence; Command’s Case

disposition and recommendation

approval letter; copy of DD Form 2486

and other relevant supporting data

generated by the FAP staff that is

specific to the offender.

(c) Documentation generated outside

of the Family Advocacy Program (Naval

Criminal Investigative Service reports;

local police reports; Base Security

Incident Complaint Reports; psychiatric

and substance abuse evaluations;

treatment reports; copies of pertinent

medical entries; Child Protective

Service reports; shelter reports;

photographs; correspondence generated

outside the Family Advocacy Program;

and other supporting data assembled

relevant to the abuse or neglect and

generated outside the FAP that are

specific to either the victim(s) or

offender(s) (e.g., Military Protective

Orders, barring letters, and civilian

temporary restraining orders) are

maintained in a separate folder and are

retrieved by case number.

Both the Navy and Marine Corps

Central Registries contain data elements

extracted from DD 2486, Child/Spouse

Abuse Incident Report.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

5 U.S.C. 301, Departmental

Regulations; DoD Directive 6400.1,

6400.1-M, 6400.2; Secretary of the Navy

Instruction 1752.3A; OPNAVINST

1752.2A; BUMEDINST 6320.22; and

MCO 1752.3B (FAP SOP); and E.O. 9397

(SSN).

PURPOSE(S):

To collect information pertaining to

the identification, prevention,

evaluation, intervention, treatment and

rehabilitation of beneficiaries involved

in abuse or neglect.

To provide headquarters centralized

case management of child sexual abuse

incidents (for Navy only).

To provide pertinent case-related

information to DoD and DON officials,

other than Commanding Officers,

responsible for specific case

interventions in abuse and/or neglect

incidents (e.g., clinical counselors

providing counseling/treatment to

victims and/or offenders, medical

personnel providing medical treatment

to victims and/or offenders).

To provide specific data on assessed

risk, safety needs, case status, and

recommended actions to commanding

officers of FAP involved service

members.

To provide case specific information

to headquarters personnel for necessary

review and oversight.

Purposes of the Central Registries: To

support local FAP case management to

include tracking of individuals,

identification of prior FAP involvement,

and monitoring of caseloads.

To support FAP budget and staffing

requirements and policy changes.

To support the BUPERS flagging and

assignment control process for FAP

involved service members.

To provide information in support of

the ’Installation Records Check (IRC)’

required by OPNAVINST 1700.9D for

screening applicants for any position

which involves the care and/or

supervision of children.

To provide the Defense Manpower

Data Center (DMDC) with nonidentifying data from the Navy Central

Registry data tapes.

To support FAP research efforts.

To respond to public and/or other

government agencies’ requests for

aggregate data.

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

In addition to those disclosures

generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.

552a(b) of the Privacy Act, these records

or information contained therein may

specifically be disclosed outside the
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 1997 / Notices 64369

DoD as a routine use pursuant to 5

U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows:

To the Executive Branch of

government in the performance of their

official duties relating to the

coordination of family advocacy

programs, medical care, and research

concerning family member abuse or

neglect.

To federal, state or local government

agencies when it is deemed

appropriated to utilize civilian

resources in the counseling and

treatment of individuals or families

involved in abuse or neglect or when it

is deemed appropriate or necessary to

refer a case to civilian authorities for

civil or criminal law enforcement.

To contractors, private and public

individuals/organizations for authorized

health research in the interest of the

federal government and the public.

When not considered necessary, client

identification data shall be eliminated

from records used for research studies.

To officials and employees of federal,

state, and local governments and

agencies when required by law and/or

regulation in furtherance of local

communicable disease control, family

abuse prevention programs, preventive

medicine and safety programs, and

other public health and welfare

programs.

To officials and employees of local

and state governments and agencies in

the performance of their official duties

relating to professional certification,

licensing, and accreditation of health

care providers.

To law enforcement officials to

protect the life and welfare of third

parties. This release will be limited to

necessary information. Consultation

with the hospital or regional judge

advocate is advised.

The ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ that

appear at the beginning of the Navy’s

compilation of systems notices also

apply to this system.

NOTE: Records of identity, diagnosis,

prognosis or treatment of any patient

which are maintained in connection

with the performance of any program or

activity relating to substance abuse

education, prevention, training,

treatment, rehabilitation, or research,

which is conducted, regulated, or

directly or indirectly assisted by any

department or agency of the United

States shall, except as provided in 42

U.S.C. 290dd-2, be confidential and be

disclosed only for the purposes and

under the circumstances expressly

authorized in 42 U.S.C. 290dd-2. These

statutes take precedence over the

Privacy Act of 1974 in regard to

accessibility of such records except to

the individual to whom the record

pertains. The ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ do

not apply to these types of records.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

STORAGE:

Records may be stored in file folders,

microfilm, magnetic tape, machine lists,

discs, and other computerized or

machine readable media.

RETRIEVABILITY:

Victim’s file is retrieved by name of

victim, case number, their Social

Security Number, and/or year of

incident.

Alleged offender’s file is retrieved by

alleged offender’s name, case number,

their Social Security Number and/or

year of incident.

Central registry data is retrieved by

any identifying data element on the DD

Form 2486.

SAFEGUARDS:

These files are highly sensitive and

must be protected from unauthorized

disclosure. While records may be

maintained in various kinds of filing

equipment, specific emphasis is given to

ensuring that the equipment areas are

monitored or have controlled access.

Access to records or information or the

central registry is limited to those

officials who have been properly

screened and trained and/or have a need

to know consistent with the purpose for

which the information was collected.

The threshold for ’need to know’ is

strictly limited to those officials who are

responsible for the identification,

prevention, evaluation, intervention,

treatment and rehabilitation of

beneficiaries involved in abuse or

neglect. Also pertinent information is

limited to DoD and DON officials

responsible for intervening in abuse

and/or neglect incidents.

Information maintained on a

computer requires password protection.

Computer terminals are located in

supervised areas with access controlled

system.

Family Advocacy Program Staff will

ensure that the in-take assessment and

clinical notes are not duplicated and

placed in both the victim and alleged

offender’s files.

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

Family Advocacy Program case

records are maintained at the activity 4

years after the last entry in the file. If

there is no subsequent activity 4 years

after closure, the records are transferred

to the National Personnel Records

Center, 9600 Page Boulevard, St. Louis,

MO 63132–5100, where they are

retained for 50 years and then

destroyed.

Navy Central Registry data base is

retained permanently at the Naval

Medical Information Management

Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue,

Bethesda, MD 20889–5066.

Marine Corps Central Registry data is

retained permanently by the

Commandant of the Marine Corps

(MHF-20), Headquarters. U.S. Marine

Corps, 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC

20380–1775.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:

Navy Central Registry: Commanding

Officer, Naval Medical Management

Information Center, 8901 Wisconsin

Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889–

5066.Marine Corps Central Registry:

Commandant of the Marine Corps;

Head, Family Advocacy Program (MHF25), Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, 2

Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20380–

1775.

Navy Centralized Child Sexual Abuse

Case Files: Chief of Naval Personnel

(Pers-661), 2 Navy Annex, Washington,

DC 20370–6610.

Case Files: Commanding officers of

installations with Family Service

Centers, Medical Treatment Facilities,

or Family Advocacy Centers at naval

and marine corps activities. Official

mailing addresses are published as an

appendix to the Department of the

Navy’s compilation of systems of

records notices.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:

Individuals seeking to determine

whether this system of records contains

information in the case files about

themselves should address written

inquiries to the commanding officer of

the naval activity from which they

received treatment. Official mailing

addresses are published as an appendix

to the Navy’s compilation of systems of

records.

Request should contain the full name

and Social Security Number of the

individual, and/or year of the incident.

Individuals seeking to determine

whether this system of records contains

information in the Navy Central Registry

about themselves shall address written

inquiries for Navy case to the Chief,

Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, 2300

E Street NW, Washington, DC 20372–

5120.

For the Marine Corps Central Registry

address written inquiries to the

Commandant of the Marine Corps

(MHF-25) Headquarters, U.S. Marine

Corps, 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC

20380–1775.
64370 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 1997 / Notices

Requests should contain the full name

and Social Security Number of the

individual.

Individuals seeking to determine

whether this system of records contains

information in the centralized Child

Sexual Abuse files about themselves

should address written inquiries to the

Chief of Naval Personnel (Pers-661) 2

Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370–

6610.

Requests should contain the full name

and Social Security Number of the

individual.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

Individuals seeking to access records

about themselves in the case files

should address written inquiries to the

commanding officer of the naval activity

from which they received treatment.

Official mailing addresses are published

as an appendix to the Navy’s

compilation of systems of records.

Request should contain the full name

and Social Security Number of the

individual, and/or year of the incident.

Individuals seeking to access

information from the Navy Central

Registry about themselves shall address

written inquiries for the Navy Central

Registry to the Chief, Bureau of

Medicine and Surgery, 2300 E Street

NW, Washington, DC 20372–5120;

For the Marine Corps Central Registry

address written inquiries to the

Commandant of the Marine Corps

(MHF-25) Headquarters, U.S. Marine

Corps, 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC

20380–1775.

Request should contain the full name

and Social Security Number of the

individual.

Individuals seeking to access records

about themselves contained in the

centralized Child Sexual Abuse files

about themselves should address

written inquiries to the Chief of Naval

Personnel (Pers-661) 2 Navy Annex,

Washington, DC 20370–6610.

Requests should contain the full name

and Social Security Number of the

individual.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

The Navy’s rules for accessing

records, and for contesting contents and

appealing initial agency determinations

are published in Secretary of the Navy

Instruction 5211.5; 32 CFR part 701; or

may be obtained from the system

manager.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

Victim; offender; other DoD

component Central Registries; medical

and dental records; educational

institutions; medical facilities; private

practitioners; law enforcement agencies;

public and private health and welfare

agencies, and witnesses.

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:

Investigatory material compiled for

law enforcement purposes may be

exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).

However, if an individual is denied any

right, privilege, or benefit for which he

would otherwise be entitled by Federal

law or for which he would otherwise be

eligible, as a result of the maintenance

of the information, the individual will

be provided access to the information

except to the extent that disclosure

would reveal the identity of a

confidential source.

Investigatory material compiled solely

for the purpose of determining

suitability, eligibility, or qualifications

for federal civilian employment,

military service, federal contracts, or

access to classified information may be

exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5),

but only to the extent that such material

would reveal the identity of a

confidential source.

An exemption rule for this system has

been promulgated in accordance with

requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(1), (2),

and 3, (c) and (e) and published in 32

CFR part 701, subpart G. For additional

information contact the system manager.

[FR Doc. 97–31865 Filed 12–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–F

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection Requests

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment

request.

SUMMARY: The Deputy Chief Information

Officer, Office of the Chief Information

Officer, invites comments on the

proposed information collection

requests as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to

submit comments on or before February

3, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and

requests for copies of the proposed

information collection requests should

be addressed to Patrick J. Sherrill,

Department of Education, 600

Independence Avenue, SW., Room

5624, Regional Office Building 3,

Washington, DC 20202–4651.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patrick J. Sherrill, (202) 708–8196.

Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf

(TDD) may call the Federal Information

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–

8339, between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,

Eastern time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires

that the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) provide interested

Federal agencies and the public an early

opportunity to comment on information

collection requests. OMB may amend or

waive the requirement for public

consultation to the extent that public

participation in the approval process

would defeat the purpose of the

information collection, violate State or

Federal law, or substantially interfere

with any agency’s ability to perform its

statutory obligations. The Deputy Chief

Information Officer, Office of the Chief

Information Officer, publishes this

notice containing proposed information

collection requests prior to submission

of these requests to OMB. Each

proposed information collection,

grouped by office, contains the

following: (1) Type of review requested,

e.g., new, revision, extension, existing

or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary

of the collection; (4) Description of the

need for, and proposed use of, the

information; (5) Respondents and

frequency of collection; and (6)

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping

burden. OMB invites public comment at

the address specified above. Copies of

the requests are available from Patrick J.

Sherrill at the address specified above.

The Department of Education is

especially interested in public comment

addressing the following issues: (1) Is

this collection necessary to the proper

functions of the Department, (2) will

this information be processed and used

in a timely manner, (3) is the estimate

of burden accurate, (4) how might the

Department enhance the quality, utility,

and clarity of the information to be

collected, and (5) how might the

Department minimize the burden of this

collection on the respondents, including

through the use of information

technology.

Dated: December 1, 1997.

Gloria Parker,

Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of

the Chief Information Officer.

Office of Educational Research and

Improvement

Type of Review: New.

Title: Research on Charter Schools

and Student with Disabilities.

Frequency: On occasion.

Affected Public: Individuals or

households; State, local or Tribal Gov’t

SEAs or LEAs.

Reporting Burden and Recordkeeping:

Responses: 832.