65808 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 16, 1997 / Notices

Comment date: December 22, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

44. Pacific Gas and Electric Company,

San Diego Gas and Electric Co.;

Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER98–899–000]

Take notice that on December 2, 1997,

the California Independent System

Operator (ISO) tendered for filing three

executed Utility Distribution Company

Operating Agreements (Agreement or

UDC agreements) with Pacific Gas &

Electric Company, San Diego Gas and

Electric Company, and Southern

California Edison Company (UDCs). ISO

requests that this filing be made

effective no later than January 1, 1998,

to enable the California Independent

System Operator to coordinate facilities,

procedures, and practices with the

utility distribution companies that will

be connected to the ISO and which plan

to participate in the market for energy

and ancillary services through the ISO.

These Agreements govern the

facilities at the interface between the

ISO and the UDCs and establish

maintenance coordination standards,

load shedding, emergency electrical

planning, and information sharing and

gathering procedures between the ISO

and the UDCs. The Agreement also

includes Schedules outlining for each

utility the facilities that comprise the

interface as well as the specific

responsibilities that will be delegated by

the ISO to each UDC.

Copies of this filing have been served

upon all parties in these proceedings.

However, because the Schedules for

each agreement are so voluminous,

copies of the Schedules are being filed

only with the Commission. Parties

wishing to see the Schedules may do so

at the ISO Office, 151 Blue Ravine Road,

Folsom, CA or at the office of Cameron

McKenna LLP, 2000 Pennsylvania

Avenue, Washington, DC, or may

request copies of the Schedules.

Comment date: January 5, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

45. Nevada Power Company

[Docket No. OA96–188–004]

Take notice that on November 12,

1997, Nevada Power Company (Nevada

Power) tendered for filing, in Docket

OA96–188–000, revised tariff sheets

which specify the on-peak and off-peak

hours of non-firm point-to-point

transmission service compliance with

the Commission’s order dated October

17, 1997. Nevada Power requests a

waiver of the 60 day notice requirement

and requests that the revised tariff

sheets be effective as of the date of the

filing.

Comment date: December 23, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

46. Commonwealth Edison Company;

Commonwealth Edison Company of

Indiana, Inc.

[Docket No. OA97–459–000]

Take notice that on November 21,

1997, Commonwealth Edison Company

and Commonwealth Edison Company of

Indiana, Inc. (collectively ComEd),

tendered for filing with the Commission

proposed revisions to ComEd’s written

procedures implementing the Standards

of Conduct set forth at 18 CFR 37.4.

A copy of this filing has been served

on the persons on the official service list

in this docket.

Comment date: December 23, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

47. Public Service Company of

Colorado

[Docket No. TX98–2–000]

On November 21, 1997, Public

Service Company of Colorado (PS

Colorado), 1225 17th Street, Denver,

Colorado 80202, filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application requesting that the

Commission order the Missouri Basin

Power Project, including its Project

Manager, Basin Electric Power

Cooperative, Tri-State Generation &

Transmission Association, Western Area

Power Administration—Rocky

Mountain Region, and the Rocky

Mountain Generation Cooperative to

provide transmission services pursuant

to Section 211 of the Federal Power Act.

PS Colorado requests 140 MW of firm

point-to-point transmission capacity in

1999, 360 MW in 2000, 330 MW in

2001, and 305 MW in 2002, increased to

account for transmission losses. PS

Colorado requests service from points in

Wyoming, Nebraska, New Mexico, Utah

and western Colorado to points in

eastern Colorado.

Comment date: January 2, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–32769 Filed 12–15–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

Notice of Non-Project Use of Project

Lands and Waters

December 10, 1997.

Take notice that the following

hydroelectric application has been filed

with the Commission and is available

for public inspection:

a. Type of Application: Non-Project

Use of Project Lands and Waters.

b. Project Name: Catawba-Wateree

Project.

c. Project No.: FERC Project No. 2232–

353.

d. Date Filed: October 17, 1997.

e. Applicant: Duke Energy

Corporation.

f. Location: Catawba County, North

Carolina, Greenwood Subdivision, Lake

Norman in Mountain Creek Township.

g. Filed pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Mr. E.M.

Oakley, Duke Energy Corporation, P.O.

Box 1006 (EC12Y), Charlotte, NC

28201–1006, (704) 382–5778.

i. FERC Contact: Brian Romanek,

(202) 219–3076.

j. Comment Date: January 21, 1998.

k. Description of the filing: Duke

Energy Corporation (Duke) proposes to

grant an easement of 0.79 acre of project

land to Mr. W.C. Edwards for a private

residential marina to serve a proposed

residential development to be known as

Greenwood subdivision. The marina

would consist of one access ramp and

24 floating boat slips. All slips would be

constructed of treated wood with

encapsulated styrofoam used for

floatation. The wood decking would be

supported by stationary wood pilings.

Also, as a part of this proposal, Duke

requests reclassification of shoreline

needed to build the above-mentioned

marina. The subject shoreline is

presently classified in the Commission

approved Shoreline Management Plan

as ‘‘Project Operations.’’ The shoreline
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 16, 1997 / Notices 65809

and adjoining property are no longer

used by Duke as a lake maintenance

facility. Duke requests that we reclassify

the shoreline to ‘‘Future Commercial/

Residential’’.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C1,

D2.

B. Comments, Protests, or Motions to

Intervene—Anyone may submit

comments, a protest, or a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

requirements of Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214.

In determining the appropriate action to

take, the Commission will consider all

protests or other comments filed, but

only those who file a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any comments,

protests, or motions to intervene must

be received on or before the specified

comment date for the particular

application.

C1. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—Any filings must bear in

all capital letters the title

‘‘COMMENTS’’,

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS

AND CONDITIONS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, or

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’, as

applicable, and the Project Number of

the particular application to which the

filing refers. Any of the above-named

documents must be filed by providing

the original and the number of copies

provided by the Commission’s

regulations to: The Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

A copy of any motion to intervene must

also be served upon each representative

of the Applicant specified in the

particular application.

D2. Agency Comments—Federal,

state, and local agencies are invited to

file comments on the described

application. A copy of the application

may be obtained by agencies directly

from the Applicant. If an agency does

not file comments within the time

specified for filing comments, it will be

presumed to have no comments. One

copy of an agency’s comments must also

be sent to the Applicant’s

representatives.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–32714 Filed 12–15–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Project No. 2188–030]

Montana Power Company; Notice of

Intent To Hold Technical Modeling

Workshop at Oak Ridge National

Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee to

Discuss the Modeling of Thermal

Impacts Associated With the Madison

Development Part of the MissouriMadison Hydroelectric Project

Proposed for Relicensing

December 10, 1997.

On January 22 and 23, 1998, a

technical modeling workshop at Oak

Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in

Oak Ridge, Tennessee will be conducted

to discuss the modeling of thermal

impacts associated with the Madison

Development. The model was used to

evaluate alternatives considered in Draft

Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)

considering issuance of a new license

for the Missouri Madison Project. The

Notice of Availability of the DEIS

appeared in the Federal Register on

October 3, 1997 (62 FR 51855).

The workshop is scheduled as

follows:

8:30 am–4:30 pm, January 22, Bldg.

1503, ORNL

8:30 am–12:00 pm, January 23, Bldg.

1503, ORNL

Workshop attendees should contact:

Mark Bevelhimer ((423) 576–0266 or

mbs@ornl.gov) to confirm attendance

and obtain lodging options and local

directions to the workshop.

Anyone wishing to submit questions

or comments regarding the model of

thermal impacts to discuss at the

workshop should address them to: Lois

D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

Written correspondence should

clearly show the following caption on

the first page: Missouri-Madison

Hydroelectric Project No. 2188–030.

For further information, please

contact Mr. R. Feller at (202) 219–2796.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–32713 Filed 12–15–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–5935–5]

Office of Research and Development;

Met One Instruments, Inc.: Application

for Equivalent Method; Determination

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of application.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) is announcing that Met

One Instruments, Inc. has submitted an

application for equivalent method

determinations on their PM10 Beta

Attenuation Ambient Particle Monitors,

Models BAM 1020 and GBAM 1020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frank F. McElroy, Human Exposure and

Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–

46), National Exposure Research

Laboratory, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Research Triangle

Park, North Carolina 27711, (919) 541–

2622.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notification is given that an application

has been received to determine if a new

PM10 monitoring method should be

designated by the Administrator of the

EPA as an equivalent method under 40

CFR part 53. The application was

received on September 12, 1997 from

Met One Instruments, Inc., 1600

Washington Blvd., Grants Pass, Oregon

97526 proposing that their PM10 Beta

Attenuation Ambient Particle Monitors,

Models BAM 1020, BAM 1020–1,

GBAM 1020, and GBAM 1020–1 be

designated as an equivalent method. If,

after appropriate technical study, the

Administrator determines that this

method should be so designated, a

document thereof will be published in

a subsequent issue of the Federal

Register.

Henry L. Longest II,

Acting Assistant Administrator for Research

and Development.

[FR Doc. 97–32787 Filed 12–15–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of

Proposed New Routine Uses

AGENCY: Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

ACTION: Amendment of system of

records to include new routine uses.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(11), the