alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,716<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,154
<INVENTORY>                                     12,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,498
<PP&E>                                         103,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,785
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,750
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,075<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,100
<SALES>                                         79,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,781
<CGS>                                           60,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    77
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,784
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,287
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES ARE NET OF ALLOWANCES
<F2>OTHER SE INCLUDES TREASURY STOCK
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                       975
<INVENTORY>                                     40,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,976
<PP&E>                                          12,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,775
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,050
<SALES>                                        241,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,558
<CGS>                                          158,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   338
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,441
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .910
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .898
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

d0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137930

AMANDA E. MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137930 COA: 288148 Washtenaw CC: 08-000115-PP NATHANIEL LIVINGSTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 16, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2007

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 6/28 7/2 7/5 13.00 15.00 14.00 41.00 1.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 7/5 7/9 7/12 11.00 15.00 15.00 37.00 4.00

7/12 7/16 7/19 11.00 16.00 16.00 36.00 7.00

7/19 7/23 7/26 18.00 17.00 16.00 38.00 13.00

7/26 7/30 8/2 26.00 20.00 17.00 40.00 23.00

8/2 8/6 8/9 26.00 20.00 17.00 39.00 24.00

8/9 8/13 8/16 30.00 20.00 17.00 40.00 27.00

8/16 8/20 8/23 26.00 18.00 17.00 49.00 12.00

8/23 8/27 8/30 16.00 17.00 16.00 58.00 -9.00

8/30 9/4 9/6 12.00 16.00 15.00 58.00 -15.00

9/6 9/10 9/13 8.00 16.00 15.00 61.00 -22.00

9/13 9/17 9/20 8.00 16.00 15.00 56.00 -17.00

9/20 9/24 9/27 8.00 16.00 15.00 45.00 -6.00

640.00 598.00 42.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

17-DAY BILL 8/30 8/31 30.00 30.00 0.00

Matures 9/17

11-DAY BILL 9/5 9/6 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 9/17

4-DAY BILL 9/12 9/13 10.00 10.00 0.00

Matures 9/17

0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-Year TIPS 7/9 7/12 7/16 8.00 8.00

20-Year TIPS ® 7/19 7/24 7/31 6.00

2-Year Note 7/23 7/25 7/31 18.00

5-Year Note 7/23 7/26 7/31 13.00 17.90 19.10

10-Year Note 8/1 8/8 8/15 13.00

30-Year Bond ® 8/1 8/9 8/15 9.00 62.60 -40.60

2-Year Note 8/27 8/29 8/31 18.00

5-year Note 8/27 8/30 8/31 13.00 19.30 11.70

10-Year Note® 9/11 9/13 9/17 8.00 8.00

2-Year Note 9/24 9/26 10/1 * 18.00

5-year Note 9/24 9/27 10/1 * 13.00 19.70 11.30

137.00 119.50 17.50

Estimates are italicized

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 59.50

R = Reopening

* The September two and five-year note auctions settle on October 1. As a result, that borrowing is counted as part of the October-December 

quarter's net cash raised. The June two and five-year auctions settled in July and thereby are part of this quarter's cash flow.
#### Victor A. SPATOLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 40589.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 9, 1971.

Appeal dismissed. 242 So.2d 223.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66124-66125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32862]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WY-921-41-5700; WYW136450]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188 (d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3 (a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW136450 for lands in Natrona County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 
16-\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to

[[Page 66125]]

reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. 
The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease 
as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act 
of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing 
to reinstate lease WYW136450 effective September 1, 1997, subject to 
the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental 
and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 97-32862 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 12/1 /14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with Small Business Majority Roundtable – North

Carolina
**SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to a group of sma ll businessme n at a roundtable hosted by Small Business Majority in Durham, NC , on June 4 , 2014. The Clean Power Plan f or Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Heather McTeer Toney /EPA R4 Allison Wise /EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Approximately 10 Durham Chamber of Commerce Members
ABIE WOLF,

Appellant,

v.

GARRY AND BONNIE STARR,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00236

- CV

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

( TC# 2012DCV5225)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that

part of the judgment as to the issue of future mental anguish and loss of use damages. We therefore

reverse that part of the judgment of the court below and render judgment in the amount of zero.

W e further fin d that the re was error in the part of the judgment as to the award of actual

damages. We therefore order that the judgment be reformed to reflect the award of actual damages

of $54,565.15. The remainder of the judgment , as reformed, is a ffirmed.

It is the f urther order that Appell ant and Appell ees each pay one

- h alf (1/2) the costs of this

appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED T HIS 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J , and Yanez, Ret. Sen ior Justice

Yanez, Ret. Senior Justice (Sitting by Assignment )
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>             5
<CIK>        0000027099
<NAME>       DATATAB, INC.


<S>                                  <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                30,473
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        234,901
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                            1,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     266,639
<PP&E>                               126,680
<DEPRECIATION>                       124,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       269,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                191,173
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                             788,955
<OTHER-SE>                          (725,314)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         269,414
<SALES>                              354,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     365,017
<CGS>                                266,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        347,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      81,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       17,464
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   17,464
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          17,464
<EPS-BASIC>                            .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .02



</TABLE>
#### Johnny WINSLOW, Sr. v. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. et al.

No. 12046.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 1, 1978.

Alfred S. Landry, New Iberia, for appellant.

R. Scott Ramsey, Berwick, for appellees.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

LOTTINGER, Judge.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

From a judgment compelling inspection of one of the defendants’ premises plus awarding attorney’s fees and expenses, the defendant, Heldenbrand, Inc., has appealed.

Prior to oral argument, plaintiff-appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal arguing that there is no right of appeal from an interlocutory judgment absence the showing of irreparable injury.

Defendant-appellant very forcefully argues that whereas a money judgment has been rendered and signed against it, and same can be executed, that irreparable injury will result if an appeal is not allowed.

The jurisprudence is clear that a judgment from an order compelling discovery is an interlocutory judgment which is non-appealable, absent a showing that irreparable injury will result. LSA-C.C.P. arts. 1841 and 2083, *Roy v. Moity,*225 So.2d 315 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1969).

We fail to see where irreparable injury will result since this matter can be raised on appeal following a trial on the merits or by application to this court for the exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction including the issuance of necessary orders staying the execution of this judgment. The purpose of discovery devices is to facilitate proceedings at the trial level, and this court will not interfere with the orderly proceedings in the trial court and entertain appeals from interlocutory decrees absent a clear showing of irreparable injury.

*700Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted and appellant is to pay all costs.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PONDER, J., dissents.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David WESTPHAL.

No. 61472.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 9, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Exhibit 32

 

FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2007 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

David G. Whalen, the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin F. Mahoney, the Chief Financial Officer of A.T. Cross Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
#### Roberta Lee DEXTER, Appellant, v. Leonard DEXTER, Appellee.

No. 69-564.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 

Embargoed Until 9 a.m. EDT Contact: Brookly McLaughlin 

September 16, 2005 (202) 622-1996 

TREASURY INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL DATA FOR JULY

Treasury International Capital (TIC) data for July are released today and posted on the U.S. 

Treasury web site (www.treas.gov/tic). The next release date, which will report on data for August, 

is scheduled for October 18, 2005. 

Net foreign purchases of long-term securities were $87.4 billion. 

• Net foreign purchases of long-term domestic securities were $101.4 billion, $10.4 billion of 

which were net purchases by foreign official institutions and $91.0 billion of which were net 

purchases by private foreign investors. 

• U.S. residents purchased a net $14.0 billion in foreign securities. 

Foreigners’ Transactions in Long-Term Securities with U.S. Residents 

(Billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted) 

12 Months Through

2003 2004 July-04 July-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05

1 Gross Purchases of Domestic Securities 13,535.4 15,288.2 14,537.1 16,263.0 1,396.1 1,488.3 1,514.6 1,279.0

2 Gross Sales of Domestic Securities 12,813.6 14,371.6 13,716.8 15,330.6 1,341.6 1,417.2 1,420.7 1,177.7

3 Domestic Securities Purchased, net (line 1 less line 2) /1 721.9 916.7 820.3 932.4 54.5 71.1 93.9 101.4

4 Private, net /2 587.0 681.1 599.4 768.6 43.0 57.9 71.0 91.0

5 Treasury Bonds & Notes, net 161.7 150.9 169.3 174.3 10.8 20.8 -0.9 24.9

6 Gov't Agency Bonds, net 129.9 205.6 144.2 206.5 8.3 18.1 17.1 32.1

7 Corporate Bonds, net 260.4 298.9 251.6 332.9 18.3 18.9 52.1 23.6

8 Equities, net 35.0 25.6 34.3 54.9 5.6 0.2 2.7 10.4

9 Official, net 134.9 235.6 221.0 163.7 11.5 13.2 23.0 10.4

10 Treasury Bonds & Notes, net 103.8 201.1 188.5 115.0 13.9 6.8 16.7 3.6

11 Gov't Agency Bonds, net 25.9 20.8 24.1 32.8 -1.7 4.6 3.2 5.7

12 Corporate Bonds, net 5.4 11.5 8.0 15.4 -0.1 1.8 2.6 1.4

13 Equities, net -0.3 2.2 0.4 0.5 -0.7 -0.1 0.6 -0.3

14 Gross Purchases of Foreign Securities 2,764.9 3,120.6 3,063.7 3,267.7 286.5 287.7 307.9 273.1

15 Gross Sales of Foreign Securities 2,834.4 3,233.2 3,159.3 3,419.1 293.7 302.5 321.0 287.1

16 Foreign Securities Purchased, net (line 14 less line 15) /3 -69.4 -112.6 -95.6 -151.5 -7.1 -14.8 -13.1 -14.0

17 Foreign Bonds Purchased, net 19.2 -29.0 0.3 -52.4 -4.6 -10.0 -1.2 -5.1

18 Foreign Equities Purchased, net -88.6 -83.6 -95.9 -99.1 -2.5 -4.8 -11.8 -8.9

19 Net Long-Term Flows (line 3 plus line 16) 652.4 804.1 724.7 780.9 47.3 56.3 80.9 87.4

/1 Net foreign purchases of U.S. securities (+)

/2 Includes International and Regional Organizations

/3 Net U.S. acquisitions of foreign securities (-)
#### Larry COMBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1984.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Chief, Appellate Division, and James K. Green, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation. The appellant, Larry Combs, was charged with violating his probation by participating in a burglary. Combs argues and the State concedes that the *only*evidence of Combs’ participation in the burglary was hearsay testimony by a police officer that another participant in the burglary had implicated Combs. There was no other evidence connecting Combs to the burglary.

While hearsay evidence is admissible in probation revocation proceedings, a defendant’s probation cannot be revoked *solely*on the basis of hearsay evidence. *Demchak v. State,*351 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA opinion filed April 7, 1977); *Robbins v. State,*318 So.2d 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Brown v. State,*305 So.2d 309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

The State attempts to avoid this rule by pointing out that other evidence was offered at the hearing concerning the burglary. But *none*of this evidence in any way connected Combs to the burglary. The rule requiring more than hearsay to establish a violation of probation requires other evidence of the defendant’s misconduct, not just other evidence.

Since the only evidence that was offered to prove Combs violated his probation was the hearsay testimony of the police officer, the order revoking probation should be reversed.

REVERSED.

CROSS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Order entered November 25, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00938-CV

IN RE L.C. AKA S.R.M., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-20-07925-Y

ORDER

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Evans

Before the Court is relator’s October 28, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus 

and request for emergency relief. We GRANT relator’s request to the extent that

we STAY the trial court from issuing any orders that would result in the child’s 

placement with real party in interest. This stay shall remain in effect pending 

resolution of this original proceeding.

The Court requests real party in interest and respondent to file a response, if 

any, to the petition for writ of mandamus by December 14, 2020.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### Charles A. MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-817.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 27, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
Financial Literacy and Education Commission Public Meeting 

September 27, 2011 - 2:30 PM – 4:30 PM

U.S. Department of the Treasury – Cash Room

 Welcome and Opening Remarks

Mary Miller, Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets, U.S. Department of the Treasury 

 President’s Advisory Council on Financial Capability Update

Richard Ketchum, Chairman and CEO, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) 

 

 Financial Literacy and Education Commission Updates

General Updates: Joshua Wright, Acting Director, Office of Financial Education and 

Financial Access, U.S. Department of the Treasury (Meeting Chair) 

 National Strategy: Karen Bellesi, Special Advisor for Community Affairs

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

 Research and Evaluation: Barbara Smith, Office of Retirement Policy

Social Security Administration

 Financial Access: Luke Reynolds, Chief, Outreach & Program Development Section 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

 Financial Education and Financial Access Approaches

Lynda Perez, Director, Division of Community Discretionary Programs

Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services 

Discussing integration of financial capability into social services (Federal level perspective)

Jonathan Mintz, Commissioner, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs

Discussing integration of financial capability into social services (local government perspective)

Timothy Flacke, Executive Director, Doorways to Dreams (D2D) Fund, Inc.

Discussing saving bond campaign at tax time season

Michael A. McBride, Acting Director, SPEC Headquarters Operations, Wage and Investment Division

Internal Revenue Service

Discussing government touch points for access

 Conclusion and Announcement

The next Commission meeting will be held on January 25, 2012.