### 46948 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 149 / Friday, August 2, 2013 / Notices

On May 6, 2013, TCEQ submitted as a SIP revision updated MVEBs for the HGB area. The MVEBs updated the March 2010 HGB 1997 8-hour ozone RFP and AD SIP revisions to replace the on-road mobile source emissions inventories for NO X and VOCs based on EPA’s MOBILE model with those based on EPA’s MOVES model. This submittal established MVEBs for the HGB area for the years 2008, 2011, 2014, 2017 and 2018. The MVEB is the amount of emissions allowed in the state implementation plan for on-road motor vehicles; it establishes an emissions ceiling for the regional transportation network. The MVEBs are provided in Tables 1 and 2:



### TABLE 

### 1—H OUSTON 

### -G ALVESTON 

### -B RAZORIA 

### 1997 8-H OUR 

### OZONE 

### R EASONABLE 

### F URTHER 

### P ROGRESS 

### NOX AND 

### VOC MVEB S

Pollutant 2008 2011 2014 2017 2018

NO X .............................................................................................................................. 2 61.95 234.92 171.63 130.00 120.99 VOC ............................................................................................................................ . 102.50 93.56 71.56 59.76 57.02



### TABLE 

### 2—H OUSTON 

### -G ALVESTON 

### B RAZORIA 

### 1997 8-H OUR 

### OZONE 

### ATTAINMENT 

### D EMONSTRATION 

### NO X AND 

### VOC MVEB S [Summer season tons per day]

Pollutant 2018

NO X .............................................. 103.34 VOC .............................................. 50.13

On May 14, 2013, EPA posted the availability of the HGB area MVEBs on EPA’s Web site for the purpose of soliciting public comments, as part of the adequacy process. The comment period closed on June 13, 2013, and we received no comments.

Today’s notice is simply an announcement of a finding that EPA has already made. EPA Region 6 sent a letter to TCEQ on July 17, 2013, finding that the MVEBs in the HGB 1997 8-hour ozone RFP and AD SIPs, submitted on May 6, 2013 are adequate and must be used for transportation conformity determinations in the HGB area. This finding has also been announced on EPA’s conformity Web site: http:// www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/ transconf/adequacy.htm.

Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. EPA’s conformity rule, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 93, requires that transportation plans, programs and projects conform to state air quality implementation plans and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do so. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.

The criteria by which EPA determines whether a SIP’s MVEB is adequate for transportation conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We have also described the process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004, final rulemaking entitled, ‘‘Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments for the New 8-hour Ozone and PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Miscellaneous Revisions for Existing Areas; Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments: Response to Court Decision and Additional Rule Changes’’ (69 FR 40004). Please note that an adequacy review is separate from EPA’s completeness review, and it should not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval of the HGB 1997 8-hour ozone RFP and AD SIP revision submittals. Even if EPA finds the budgets adequate, the HGB RFP and AD SIP revision submittals could later be disapproved.

Within 24 months from the effective date of this notice, the HGB-area transportation partners, such as the Houston-Galveston Area Council, will need to demonstrate conformity to the new MVEBs if the demonstration has not already been made, pursuant to 40 CFR 93.104(e). See 73 FR 4419 (January 24, 2008).

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: July 19, 2013. Ron Curry, Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2013–18545 Filed 8–1–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9841–5]**

**Proposed Agreement Regarding Site Costs and Covenants Not To Sue for**  **American Lead and Zinc Mill Site, Ouray County, Colorado** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice; request for public
comment.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of the proposed administrative settlement agreement (Settlement Agreement) under section 122(h) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(h) between the EPA and The Blue Tee Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘the Settling Party’’). The Settlement Agreement provides for Settling Party’s payment of certain response costs incurred at the American Lead and Zinc Mill Superfund Site near Ouray, Colorado.

The Settling Party will pay within 30 days after the effective date of this Settlement Agreement ($1,630,764), plus an additional sum for interest on that amount calculated from April 1, 2012 through the date of payment.

In accordance with Section 122(i) of CERCLA, this notice is being published to inform the public of the proposed Settlement Agreement and of the opportunity to comment. For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the proposed Settlement Agreement. EPA will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received by September 3, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments should be sent Michael Rudy, Senior Enforcement Specialist (Mail Code ENF–RC), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6332 or via electric mail at rudy.mike@epa.gov and should reference the American Lead and Zinc Mill Site, the EPA Docket No. CERCLA– 08–2013–0004. The Agency’s response to any comments, the proposed agreement and additional background information relating to the agreement is available for public inspection at the


### 46949 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 149 / Friday, August 2, 2013 / Notices

EPA Superfund Record Center, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, during normal business hours.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Richard Sisk, Senior Enforcement Attorney, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mail Code 8ENF– LEP, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6638 or via electric mail at sisk.richard@epa.gov.

Dated: July 23, 2013. Andrew M. Gaydosh, Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of Enforcement, Compliance and Environmental Justice, EPA, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013–18549 Filed 8–1–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION** 

**FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking; Notice of Charter**  **Renewal**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

**ACTION :**  Notice of renewal of the FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking.

**SUMMARY :**  Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (‘‘FACA’’), 5 U.S.C. App. 2, and after consultation with the General Services Administration, the Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has determined that renewal of the FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking (‘‘the Committee’’) is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the FDIC by law. The Committee has been a successful undertaking by the FDIC and has provided valuable feedback to the agency on a broad range of policy issues that have particular impact on small community banks throughout the United States and the local communities they serve, with a focus on rural areas. The Committee will continue to review various issues that may include, but not be limited to, the latest examination policies and procedures, credit and lending practices, deposit insurance assessments, insurance coverage issues, and regulatory compliance matters, as well as any obstacles to the continued growth and ability of community banks to extend financial services in their local markets in the current market environment. The structure and responsibilities of the Committee are unchanged from when it was originally established in July 2009. The Committee will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Committee Management Officer of the FDIC, at (202) 898–7043.

Dated: July 29, 2013. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Robert E. Feldman, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–18578 Filed 8–1–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6714–01–P**

**FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION**

**[File No. 122 3130]**

**Essentia Natural Memory Foam Company, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed**  **Consent Order to Aid Public Comment**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Trade Commission.

**ACTION :**  Proposed Consent Agreement.

**SUMMARY :**  The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint and the terms of the consent order—embodied in the consent agreement—that would settle these allegations.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before August 26, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Interested parties may file a
comment at https:// ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ essentianmfoamconsent online or on paper, by following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section below. Write ‘‘Essentia, File No. 122 3130’’ on your comment and file your comment online at https:// ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ essentianmfoamconsent by following the instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H–113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Robin Moore (202–326–2167), FTC, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page (for July 25, 2013), on the World Wide Web, at http://www.ftc.gov/ os/actions.shtm . A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room 130–H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326–
2222.

You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to consider your comment, we must receive it on or before August 26, 2013. Write ‘‘Essentia, File No. 122 3130’’ on your comment. Your comment—including your name and your state—will be placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable, on the public Commission Web site, at http://www.ftc.gov/os/ publiccomments.shtm . As a matter of discretion, the Commission tries to remove individuals’ home contact information from comments before placing them on the Commission Web site.

Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive personal information, like anyone’s Social Security number, date of birth, driver’s license number or other state identification number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive health information, like medical records or other individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not include any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information which . . . is privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer

names.

If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for confidential treatment, and