alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1





Exhibit 4.1





CONSENT OF ERNST AND YOUNG LLP

 

Dated: January 16, 2018

We refer to the Fairness Opinion (the “Fairness Opinion”) dated December 8, 2017,
which we prepared for the board of directors of Imvescor Restaurant Group Inc.
(the “Company”) in connection with the amalgamation between the Company and MTY
Subco (as defined in the Information Circular). We consent to the inclusion of the
Fairness Opinion in the Information Circular, dated January 12, 2018, which in turn is
included in the Registration Statement on Form F-80 of MTY Food Group Inc. dated the
date hereof (the “Registration Statement”) and filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also consent to the inclusion of our firm
name in the Information Circular. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we come
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the U.S.
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), or the rules and regulations adopted by
the SEC thereunder, nor do we admit that we are experts with respect to any part of the
Registration Statement within the meaning of the term “experts” as used in the Act or
the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder.

(Signed) Ernst & Young LLP

 ERNST AND YOUNG LLP
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2023*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter 28.29

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE^

3-Year Note 4/17 40.00 0.00

10-Year Note (r) 4/17 32.00 0.00

30-Year Bond (r) 4/17 18.00 0.00 74.40 15.60

5-Year TIPS 4/28 22.00 1.00 0.00 22.00

20-Year Bond (r) 5/1 12.00 0.00

2-Year Note 5/1 42.00 0.00

2-Year FRN 5/1 24.00 0.00

5-Year Note 5/1 43.00 0.00

7-Year Note 5/1 35.00 0.00 172.95 -16.95

3-Year Note 5/15 40.00 0.00

10-Year Note 5/15 35.00 0.00

30-Year Bond 5/15 21.00 0.00 75.17 20.83

2-Year FRN (r) 5/26 22.00 0.00 0.00 22.00

10-Year TIPS (r) 5/31 15.00 0.00

20-Year Bond 5/31 15.00 0.00

2-Year Note 5/31 42.00 0.00

5-Year Note 5/31 43.00 0.00

7-Year Note 5/31 35.00 0.00 89.75 60.25

3-Year Note 6/15 40.00 0.00

10-Year Note (r) 6/15 32.00 0.00

30-Year Bond (r) 6/15 18.00 0.00 32.45 57.55

5-Year TIPS (r) 6/30 20.00 1.00

20-Year Bond (r) 6/30 12.00 0.00

2-Year Note 6/30 42.00 0.00

2-Year FRN (r) 6/30 22.00 0.00

5-Year Note 6/30 43.00 0.00

7-Year Note 6/30 35.00 0.00 105.58 68.42

800.00 550.29 249.71

Estimates are italicized. r = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 278

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 01/27/2023 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
#### STATE ex rel. Johnny Lee FORT, Relator, v. Honorable B. J. DRIVER, Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-1019.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

*39Edward D. Foreman, St. Petersburg, for relator.

MANN, Judge.

A Crucial witness in the State’s first degree murder case against Fort testified at a hearing on the State’s motion for extension of time that she was in fear and left the state for her own safety. She is now in protective custody at an undisclosed location. The trial judge found, correctly, that there was no showing that *“the accused*has caused major delay or disruption of preparation of proceedings, as by preventing the attendance of witnesses or otherwise,” CrPR 3.191(f) (vi), 33 F.S.A., but that the delay was justified by exceptional circumstances. CrPR 3.191(f) (iii) permits delay upon a showing “that specific evidence or testimony is not available despite diligent efforts to secure it, but will become available at a later time.”

It was not necessary that the State show that the defendant himself threatened the life of the witness. The important thing is that she fled, for good reason, on account of rumors which came through her relatives and, rightly or wrongly, were attributed to his relatives. The trial judge soundly interpreted the rule.

We might mention that considerable judicial labor could have been saved by a little more diligence on the part of counsel for both sides in bringing to judicial attention the problems involved here. An earlier motion for extension and earlier application for relief in this court would have conduced to the smoother administration of justice.

Prohibition denied and because the trial of this case is imminent, rehearing is dispensed with.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                    CPC INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                 Nine Months Ended September 30, 1996 and 1995


  Earnings per common share for CPC International Inc. is based on net income
available to common stockholders and the average number of common shares
outstanding during each period.  Net income available to common shareholders
has been reduced by the pro rata ESOP preferred stock dividend net of the tax 
benefit. A potentially dilutive effect on earnings per common share results 
from the operation of the 1993 Stock and Performance Plan, the deferred
compensation and stock options arising from a previous executive incentive
compensation plan, and the Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors. 
The effect on earnings per common share resulting from the assumed exercise of
outstanding options and delivery of deferred stock awards under these programs
is not material.  The maximum number of shares of common stock issuable and
deliverable under such assumptions, without giving effect to the assumed
reacquisitions of common stock with the proceeds from options exercised,
amounted to the following percentages of the average number of shares of common
stock outstanding at September 30:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   1996              1995
                                                   ----              ----
                                                    <S>              <C>
                                                    2.6%             2.2%
</TABLE>

  Since the dilution resulting from deferred stock awards and stock options is
less than 3%, these items have not been considered in the computation of shares
outstanding.  Furthermore, the potentially dilutive effect derived from using
the if-converted method in calculating fully diluted earnings per share for the
ESOP would not cause the dilution to exceed 3% even when considered with the
aforementioned programs.





                                       14
#### DIXIE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION v. Leonard KINCHEN et al.

No. 53855.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Leonard Kinchen, et al, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston. 280 So.2d 332, 280 So.2d 342.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

In the MatterofJett Pro Line Maintenance ) Docket No. TBA \ 

### ) 

### ) ) FAA Case No. 2011WP910076 Judge Godwin



# ________________________)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

The undersigned hereby enters his appearance in this matter as counsel for Respondent Jett Pro Line Maintenance. Further communications to Respondent should directed to the undersigned at the address and contact numbers given below.

Dated: March 5, 2014

# ~~) .. ,\ tln 

# 'V**L:/C~<Z--~9-------** John Craig Weller Aerlex Law Group 2800 281h Street Suite 200 Santa Monica, CA 90405 TEL: (530) 205-9884 FAX: (530) 205-9371U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

In the Matter ofJett Pro Line Maintenance ) 

### ) ) ) 

# ________________________) Docket No. TBA FAA Case No. 2011WP910076 Judge Godwin

CERTFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certifythat I served a copy ofthe attached Notice ofAppearance by U.S. First Class Mail on the persons listed below. In addition, in accordance with Paragraph 6 ofthe Procedural Order, I also served a copy byfacsimile on the presidingJudge and FAA counsel.

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20S91 ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000

Sam Nugud, President Jett Pro Line Maintenance 8517 Earhart Road, Suite 210 Oakland, CA 946212

Sam Nugud, President Jett Pro Line Maintenance P.O. Box 3190 Ontario, CA 91761

Autumn Killingham, Esq. Enforcement Division, AGC-600 Office ofthe Chief Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 FAX: 202-267-S769 ONE COPYThe Honorable Richard 

### C. Goodwin Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearing, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey, SE (E11-310) Washington, DC 20S90 

### TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

Dated: March 5, 2014 //\ <

# ·~ 'fl



# ..**~--- ~** 

# aJJ.x..**~1**

John Craig Weller Aerlex Law Group 2800 281h Street Suite 200 Santa Monica, CA 90405 

### TEL: 530-205-9884

FAX: 530-205-9371
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

QUALITY BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
, and JEZERIAH WEBB, Appellant s ,

v.

RUSSELL JACOBS and CHERYL ABER, Appellee s

.

No. 4D2024

- 0008

[ August 22, 2024 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Fabienne Elizabeth Fahnestock , Judge;

L.T. Case No. CACE21

- 001840

.

Harry Malka of Malka & Kravitz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant s

.

Michael L Cotzen of Cotzen Law, Aventura, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS
, D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending

January 1 – March 31, 2015

Board 

Approval Date Country Amount Type U.S. Position Background

1/14/15 Poland 

(Republic of)

SDR 15.5 billion

($23 billion)

FCL Support http://www.imf.org/exter

nal/pubs/cat/longres.asp

x?sk=42605.0

2/2/15 Kenya SDR 488.52 million

($688.3 million)

SBA / SCF Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2015/pr1529.htm

2/23/15 Serbia 

(Republic of)

SDR 935.4 million

($1.3 billion)

SBA Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2015/pr1567.htm

2/23/15 Liberia SDR 32.3 million

($45.6 million)

SDR 25.84 million

($36.5 million)

RCF / 

Catastrophe 

Containment 

Relief Trust 

(CCRT)

Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2015/pr1569.htm

3/11/15 Ukraine SDR 12.348 billion

($17.5 billion)

EFF Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2015/pr15107.htm

3/18/15 Central African 

Republic

SDR 5.57 million

($7.62 million)

RCF Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2015/pr15129.htm
EXHIBIT 23

 

March 25, 2020

Ms. Stacey Hollabaugh

XTO Energy Inc.

210 E. 7th Street

Fort Worth, TX  76102

 

Re:    HGT Consent Letter

Dear Ms. Hollabaugh:

 

This letter is to confirm that Miller and Lents, Ltd. (M&L) authorizes XTO Energy Inc. (XTO) to use our name and report dated March 25, 2020, related to the Hugoton Royalty Trust (HGT) for use in the electronic filing of the HGT Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC.

 

Please provide us with an exact copy of the Annual Report on form 10-K as electronically filed with the SEC.

 

Very truly yours,

 

MILLER AND LENTS

Texas Registered Engineering Firm No. F-1442

 

 

 

By /S/ KATIE M. REINAKER

     Katie M. Reinaker,P. E. 

     Senior Vice President
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 09, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 09, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0253. WILLIAM TODD YANCEY v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16CR018
#### Karen GRAHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-302.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1978.

Norman Francis Haft, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before KEHOE, J., and BOYD, JOSEPH A. JR., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judges.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, brings this appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a jury verdict on the charge of second degree murder.

We have carefully considered each of the points raised by appellant on appeal and find them to be without merit. See *Johnsen v. State,*332 So.2d 69 (Fla.1976); *McDole*v. *State,*283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973); *Williams v. State,*110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); *Redditt v. State,*84 So.2d 317 (Fla.1955); *Louette v. State,*152 Fla. 495, 12 So.2d 168 (1943); *Davis v. State,*349 So.2d 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); *Shapiro v. State,*345 So.2d 361 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); *Frierson v. State,*339 So.2d 312 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *Wilson*v. *State,*305 So.2d 50 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); *Lawson v. State,*304 So.2d 522 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); *Foster v. State,*266 So.2d 97 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); *Rodriquez v. State,*189 So.2d 656 (Fla.3d DCA 1966); Section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1975); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.153(a). Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roy JOHNSON.

No. 61508.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1978.

In re: Roy Johnson, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for stay order. Parish of Caddo.

*1046Writ granted. On the showing made, Roy Johnson is entitled to be released on his own recognizance. La. Code Criminal Procedure, Art. 336.

SANDERS, C. J., dissents from the granting of the writ, being of the opinion that the showing made is insufficient.

SUMMERS, J., dissents.
1

If you have not created a Login.gov 

account, stop here. Return to this 

document after you have completed this 

essential task. 

To create a Login.gov account: 

https://login.gov/create-an-account/
BEFORE completing your Project and Expenditure Report, you must have already: • Logged into Treasury’s Portal using your Login.gov account. If you don’t have one, then create one. • Designated your key roles (Account Administrator, Point of Contact for Reporting, and Authorized 

Representative for Reporting – it is important that you understand the capabilities and 

responsibilities of each role)

2

Who was named as your Authorized Representative when your city certified to accept funding in the 

summer of 2021? 

This person was automatically designated to the role of Account Administrator. They are the only one who 

can access Treasury’s portal and designate roles to others. Once this has been done, then others can step 

into the reporting process.
3

PLEASE NOTE:

The slides that follow represent what you should see on 

your screen for each step. If you are unable to find the 

correct buttons/boxes as noted on the following slides, you 

will need to create a helpdesk ticket with Treasury’s IT 

Department by emailing:

COVIDReliefITSupport@treasury.gov
Treasury Compliance Portal

Designating Roles

Designating Roles

4

Treasury’s Compliance Portal: https://portal.treasury.gov/compliance
5

To designate roles, select the “hamburger” (menu) icon at the top of the page.

Click here
6

After clicking the “hamburger” icon, select “Account” from the sidebar menu.

Click here
7

Your entity should appear under “Account Name.” Select it.

Click here Account Name
8

Select “Certification” from the sidebar menu. 

If you are the Account Administrator, enter your name in the box provided and select “”Submit.”

Click here

Click here
9

After certifying, select “Designation Form” from the sidebar menu. On this page, you will be able to assign the three 

roles: Account Administrator, Authorized Representative for Reporting and Point of Contact for Reporting. A single role can have multiple people assigned to it and a single person can be assigned to multiple roles.

Click here

Click “Complete” 

after each entry
10

Once you have completed designating roles* to all the appropriate people, select “Go Back to the Introduction.”

If you go in and edit yourself, be sure that the “Account Administrator” role also moves over

Click here

* There is system latency in the portal. If you do not immediately see new roles showing, refresh your screen and they should appear.
11

Example of Completed Point of Contact List
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65443-65444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32478]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. 
Kirkwood Gas and Electric Company, (E.O. Cal.) was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on 
November 18, 1997 (CIV-S-97-2164, DFL PAN). The proposed Consent Decree 
resolves the United States' claims against Kirkwood Gas and Electric 
Company (KG&E) pursuant to Section 113(b) of the Clean Air Act for 
KG&E's failure to obtain a Prevention of Significant Deterioration 
permit before construction of its facility. The alleged violation 
occurred at the diesel generator facility at Kirkwood Ski and Summer 
Resort in Alpine County, California. Under the Consent Decree, KG&E 
agrees to install a selective catalytic reduction control system and a 
continuous emission monitor to monitor emissions of oxides of nitrogen, 
to conduct source testing and to practice good air pollution control 
practices. KG&E also agrees to raise the height of its powerhouse 
exhaust stacks. KG&E also agrees to pay a penalty of $13,671.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C. 20044; and 
refer to United States v. Kirkwood Gas and Electric Company, DOJ Ref. # 
90-5-2-1-2123.
    The proposed settlement agreement may be examined at the Office of 
the United States Attorney, Eastern District of California, 650 Capitol 
Mall, Sacramento, California 95814 and at the office of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105; and at the

[[Page 65444]]

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $5.50 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-32478 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
#### Delores Rouse MALLETTE v. SINGING RIVER HOSPITAL SYSTEMS, Dr. Robert D. McBroom and Dr. Robert L. Thompson.

No. 50127.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 5, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1978.

Sekul, Hornsby, Wallace & Teel, Thomas L. Wallace, Biloxi, for appellant.

Bryant & Stennis, Thomas L. Stennis, II, Roger T. Clark, Gulfport, Colingo & Blackwell, Joe R. Colingo, Megehee, Brown & Williams, Roy C. Williams, Pascagoula, for appellees.

SUGG, J.,

for the Court.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and WALKER, BROOM, LEE, BOWLING and COFER, JJ., concur.
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 256 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 256 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI2 TARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 

3 2002. 

4 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

5 Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243; 50 U.S.C. 

6 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS