alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
自我证明表 

 

说明 

本模板允许申请人根据以下任何一项或多项要求的标准,自我证明他们有资格参加STAY DC计划。

 租房义务(例如,在没有租赁/出租/转租协议的情况下,证明居住在符合条件的出租单元内)

 财务影响(例如,失业、收入减少、开支大幅增加或其他财务困难)。

 住房影响(例如,住房不稳定或无家可归的风险)

 收入资格(例如,家庭总收入达到或低于80% AMI)。

仔细阅读每一部分,只填写适用的标准部分,对您无法提供所需的证明文件或适用的第三方的书面证明,则因此需要自我证明。

注意:这是一份可填写的表格,您可以直接点击下面每个适用的方框,直接填写您的信息。

一旦您填写了适用的标准部分,您必须在最后签字证明。

填写完毕并签名的证明可以打印出来,并附在纸质申请中,或与在线申请一起上传,网址是 stay.dc.gov 。

根据美国财政部的指导,STAY DC项目可能会进行额外的测试或审查过程,以帮助尽量减少欺诈的可能性。使用自我证明可能会使您的申请延迟,要

求您提供更多的信息,或导致对您的援助金额的限制。 

 

如果您对文档要求有任何疑问,请访问本计划网站 stay.dc.gov,或 在美国东部时间周一至周五上午7点到下午7点致电联系中心,电话号码为

833-4-STAYDC (833-478-2932)。

 

 

 

 

 
租房义务的自我证明 

如果现在不能提供所需的租房义务文件,请用此表提供关于您的租房信息。[如果您有这些文件并计划作为申请的一部分提供,可以跳到表格的下一节。]

请提供有关您的出租单元和住房提供者的信息

 

租房单元地址 

地址2 

城市 

州 

邮政编码 

房屋提供者的姓名 

住房提供者的电子邮件地址 

房屋提供者的电话号码 

租赁安排开始的日期(可选) 

租房协议预定结束日期(可选) 

月租金是否包括水电费? 是  否 

 

如果是,每月支付给住房提供者的费用中,有多少与水电费有关? 

注意:如果您使用书面证明来证明目前的租房义务,根据STAY DC计划向您提供的援助将被限制在每月最高100%的公平市场租金或申请人居住地区

的区域公平市场租金(以较高者为准),这是由HUD最新确定并在 https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr.html上公示的。

此外,根据书面自我证明的租金支付金额提供的援助,总共限制在三(3)个月。

 
财务影响资格的自我证明 

如果您现在不能提供所需的财务影响文件,请证明您或家庭中的一人或多人如何因COVID-19疫情直接或间接地符合失业福利或经历家庭收入减少、

产生重大费用或经历其他财务困难。/[如果有所需的文件并计划与申请一起提交,可以跳到表格的下一节。]

 

 
关于住房不稳定或无家可归风险的自我证明 

如果您现在不能提供所需的住房不稳定或无家可归风险的文件,请解释您或家庭中的一个或多个人是如何面临住房不稳定或无家可归的风险的。[如

果您有所需的文件并计划与申请一起提交,可以跳到表格的下一节]

请解释您或家庭中的一人或多人目前如何面临无家可归或住房不稳定的风险 (可通过逾期的公用事业或租金通知或驱逐通知或不安全或不健康的生

活条件证明)

 

 
家庭收入资格的自我证明 

如果现在不能提供所需的收入证明文件,或者您认为自己的收入符合以下的分类资格,请使用此表来证明收入情况。[如果有所需的文件并计划作为

申请的一部分提供,可以跳到签名页。]

 

分类资格 

请说明您的家庭收入是否在2020年1月1日或之后因参加了以下一项或多项地区或联邦计划而被认定为符合条件。

 以房客为基础的住房选择凭证

 基于项目的住房选择凭证

 公共住房

 低收入住房税收优惠

 哥伦比亚特区住房生产信托基金

 国家住房信托基金

 住宅投资伙伴计划(HOME)

 包容性区划

 退伍军人事务支持性住房(VASH)凭证

 快速重新安排住房

 基于项目的HCV COV-19住房援助计划(CHAP)

 基于租户的租赁助理(TBRA)。

 住房稳定补助金(HSG)

 华盛顿特区紧急租房援助计划(当地)

 补充营养援助计划(SNAP)

 贫困家庭临时援助(TANF)

 
家庭收入证明 

如果您不能提供所需的文件,并且目前不符合上述任何计划的资格,请使用此表来证明您的收入。\ [如果您有所需的文件并计划作为申请的一部分提

供,您可以跳到签名页。]

请注意,家庭收入自我证明需要每三个月重新证明收入情况,以获得后续资助。

全名(包括自己的名字) 与您的关系(在您的名

字上注明 "自己")。 

有工作吗? 

(是或否) 年总收入 

所有来源的年总收入(所有成员的总收入)。

家庭收入是用以下两种方法之一来确定的。

 2020年的年收入。您所有租房家庭成员在2020日历年的收入总和,使用您的国内税收局(IRS)1040系列表格上注明的调整后总收入

(AGI),用于个人联邦年度所得税;或

 最近的年收入。您所有家庭成员在过去两个月的收入之和,并乘以6。如果使用这种方法来确定收入资格,申请人将需要每3个月重新证明他们

的收入,以获得申请人申请的任何奖励延期。

潜在的收入来源可能包括:工资、薪水、小费、佣金、商业收入、利息、股息、社保福利、年金、保险、社保、年金、保险单、退休基金、养老金、

残疾或死亡福利、失业和残疾赔偿金、工人赔偿金和遣散费以及福利援助金。 
关于缺乏收入证明文件的证明 

请详细说明您无法提供完成收入资格审查所需证明文件的原因。

 

 

 
证明 

我声明(或证明、核实或声明),在认可伪证的惩罚下,上述内容是真实和正确的。

我同意根据要求,向STAY DC项目管理员提供额外的信息或文件。

申请人签名: _________________________________________

日期: _________________________________________

警告:本表所提供的信息将随时接受财政部的核查,美国法典第18章第1001节规定,个人如果故意向美国政府的部门做出虚假或欺诈性

的陈述,将犯有重罪,将终止援助。
Fw: MATS RIA for OMB Distribution 12/09 (Message 2 of 2) 

 RobertJ Wayland 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 12/09/2011 04:15 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell 

Cortney - 

Attached are the remaining chapters. 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Chapter 5_HealthWelfareCobenefits_1209_clean.docx 

Chapter 5_HealthWelfareCobenefits_1209 (REDLINE).docx 

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1209_clean.docx 

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1209 (REDLINE).docx 

Chapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1209_clean.doc 
Chapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1209 (REDLINE).doc 

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBenefits_1209_clean.doc 

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBenefits_1209 (REDLINE).doc
#### CITY OF MIAMI SPRINGS et al., Appellants, v. Gene P. NAPLES et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1192.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM,

Appeal dismissed.
#### Petition of Jan Agnes KLEINMAN for the adoption of three (3) minor children.

No. Q-323.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 10, 1972.

Roderic G. Magie, of Levin, Warfield, Graff, Mabie & Rosenbloum, Pensacola, and Gloria Kleinman, in pro. per., for appellant.

Fletcher Fleming, of Shell, Fleming, Davis & Menge, Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This Court has carefully reviewed all the record we have before us and listened to oral arguments made and, while we sympathize with the appellant, Mrs. Gloria Kleinman, this Court cannot delve into the reasons which culminated in the divorce in 1964; nor can we retry the issues in the adoption proceedings from which this appeal is taken.

We have denied the Motion to Strike the brief of appellant, although the grounds alleged therein appear to be well-grounded, in view of the fact that appellant is not represented by counsel, so that we could give full consideration to appellant’s plea. Nevertheless, after full study, the Motion to Dismiss the appeal must be, and the same is hereby granted, and the appeal dismissed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32790]



[[Page 65694]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), that the January 8, 1998 regular 
meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board) will not be 
held. The FCA Board will hold a special meeting at 9:00 a.m. on 
Tuesday, January 27, 1998. An agenda for this meeting will be published 
at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

    Dated: December 11, 1997.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32790 Filed 12-11-97; 12:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-M
#### John Allen KNOWLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 29, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kit A. KING, Appellant.

No. 01-3509.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 2002.

Filed Aug. 15, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kit A. King appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Mr. King argues, as he did below, that there was no probable cause to stop the car in which he was a passenger. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude, for the reasons explained by the district court, that the officer in question had probable cause under the totality of the circumstances to believe that the driver of the car had committed a traffic violation. *See United States v. Snook,*88 F.3d 605, 607 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Kathleen A. Jaudzemis, United States Magistrate Judge for the District Nebraska.
H. R. 2473 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 275 Penn 

Avenue in Salem, Ohio, as the ‘‘Howard Arthur Tibbs Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. HOWARD ARTHUR TIBBS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 275 Penn Avenue in Salem, Ohio, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Howard Arthur Tibbs Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Howard Arthur Tibbs Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from Continental Information Systems Corporation
     as of and for the six months ended November 30, 2000.
     (In thousands, except per share amounts)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    May-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                         Nov-30-2000
<CASH>                               3,008
<SECURITIES>                         000
<RECEIVABLES>                        3,991
<ALLOWANCES>                         408
<INVENTORY>                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     6,591
<PP&E>                               488
<DEPRECIATION>                       278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       12,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                338
<BONDS>                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                000
<PREFERRED>                          000
<COMMON>                             71
<OTHER-SE>                           35,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         12,900
<SALES>                              550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     921
<CGS>                                541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     97
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (364)
<INCOME-TAX>                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,864)
<DISCONTINUED>                       1,500
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      000
<CHANGES>                            000
<NET-INCOME>                         (364)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.05)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40098 Summary Calendar

WENDELL K. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus R. MILLER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER 3; J. ALFORD, WARDEN; P. ADAMS, PROPERTY OFFICER, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:97-CV-403

- - - - - - - - - - July 6, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Wendell K. Washington, Texas prisoner # 649796, appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failing to exhaust administrative remedies.
See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). He has also filed a motion to supplement the record on appeal. Washington seeks to supplement the record on appeal with all docket entries as of January 23, 1998; all subsequent complaints; all official documentation substantiating his claim; hisNo. 98-40098 -2- witnesses statements; and his original amended and all additional complaints that are part of his statement of facts. To the extent that these documents are already included in the record, Washington’s motion is unnecessary. The only documents that Washington has presented to this court which are not part of the record pertain to disciplinary action taken against Washington at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Eastham Unit. These documents are not relevant to whether Washington has exhausted his administrative remedies, the sole issue before this court. Washington’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED. Washington contends that he was unable to exhaust his administrative remedies because he did not receive notice that his grievances had been denied until the time for filing an administrative appeal had expired. His allegation does not raise a valid excuse for failing to exhaust available administrative remedies. See Wendell v. Asher , 162 F.3d 887, 890-92 (5th Cir. 1998); Underwood v. Wilson , 151 F.3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 1809 (1999). Because Washington is seeking exclusively monetary relief, however, it is possible that he was not required to pursue administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See Whitley v.
Hunt , 158 F.3d 882, 887 (5th Cir. 1998)(clarifying that under 1997e, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a federal prisoner need not exhaust administrative remedies that are not capable of providing redress); see Marsh v. Jones , 53 F.3d 707, 710 (5th Cir. 1995).No. 98-40098 -3- The district court’s dismissal of Washington’s § 1983 complaint for non-exhaustion is VACATED and the cause REMANDED for the district court to address whether monetary relief is available through the Texas Department of Criminal Justice grievance procedure.
VACATED AND REMANDED; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              4,800    
<SECURITIES>                                            0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,678,744    
<ALLOWANCES>                                      164,831    
<INVENTORY>                                     8,684,035    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,049,092    
<PP&E>                                          9,011,061    
<DEPRECIATION>                                  7,342,715    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,588,086    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,641,024    
<BONDS>                                                 0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0    
<PREFERRED>                                             0    
<COMMON>                                       11,290,405    
<OTHER-SE>                                              0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,588,086    
<SALES>                                         5,201,335    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,201,335    
<CGS>                                           4,273,554    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,288,125    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                100,301    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,460,645)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (555,045)   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (905,600)   
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0    
<CHANGES>                                               0    
<NET-INCOME>                                     (905,600)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.53)
                                               


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Continental MaterialsCorporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29,2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesG. Gidwitz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 13, 2003 |   |                                                                 |
|--------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         |   |                                                                 |
|         |   |                                                                 |
|         | By:    | /s/   James G. Gidwitz                                |   |
|         |   | James G. Gidwitz  Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
March 26, 2015

1

Amendment for Exemption No. 11238 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0719 

Registered Owner Name:

San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Registered Owner Address:

8316 Century Park Court

San Diego CA 92123

Attn: Dallas Cormier, CP52E

Aircraft Description:

Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL) 

sUAS

Aircraft Registration/Serial Number:

N55TD/0030200300632

N619FS/0030200300633

N619TD/0030200300634

N858JE/0030200300635

N858DC/0030200300636

N619CV/0030200300637

N554GE/0030200300638

N553GE/0030200300639

Aircraft Builder:

Physical Sciences Inc.

Year Manufactured:

2014

Aircraft Model Designation:

InstantEye Mk-2 Gen3

Engine Model:

Mk-2 Gen Brushless Motor

Propeller Model:

PSI 7 x 5 Pusher

San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) received Exemption No. 11238 on March 26, 

2015 for the InstantEye Mk-2 Gen2. 

SDG&E is requesting to amended that exemption to include the InstantEye Mk-2 Gen3. Because 

it took over 6 months for our exemption request to get approved, the InstantEye Mk-2 Gen2 is 

now obsolete. 

The InstantEye Gen 3 is the same Unmanned Aircraft as the Gen 2 but it’s bigger in size and 

capabilities. The InstantEye is a vertical take off and landing (VTOL) quadrotor small unmanned 

aerial system (sUAS). The aircraft is in a “X” configuration with 4 rotors centered at the tips of 

its carbon fiber arms separated by 22.23 cm on a side for the Gen 3 vs. 20 cm on the Mk-2. The 

aircraft is all-electric with a brushless motor driving each rotor. There is a 4 Amp/Hour Lithium 

polymer rechargeable /replaceable battery at the bottom of the center of the aircraft on the Gen 3 

vs. a 2 Amp/hour on the Gen 2. Maximum gross takeoff weight for the Gen 3 is 725g and the Gen 

2 is 610g. Maximum endurance for the Gen 3 is 30 minutes and 20minutes for the Gen 3.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 11
Consumer Use: No 

SAT (concerns) (03/21/2014):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: Slow to moderate 

PBT rating: P1B1T2 

Health: 1-2 Drinking Water, Inhalation, XB Testing (Testing desired)

Eco: 1 Water (All releases to water with a CC = ppb) 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 11
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 11
#### Clifford H. SEXTON, Appellant, v. PANNING LUMBER COMPANY, etc., and Atlantic Chemicals, Inc., etc., Appellees.

No. 70-86.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 9, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Roger A. Barker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2501 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2501

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To require the National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration and the Federal Communications Commission to update the 
         memorandum of understanding on spectrum coordination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Spectrum Coordination Act''.

SEC. 2. UPDATE OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON SPECTRUM COORDINATION 
              BETWEEN NTIA AND FCC.

    Not later than December 31, 2022, the National Telecommunications 
and Information Administration and the Federal Communications 
Commission shall update the Memorandum of Understanding on Spectrum 
Coordination entered into in January 2003, to--
            (1) improve upon the process for resolving frequency 
        allocation disputes in shared or adjacent allocations between 
        the National Telecommunications and Information Administration 
        and the Federal Communications Commission to ensure that such 
        disputes are definitively resolved in an efficient and timely 
        manner;
            (2) ensure that spectrum is used efficiently; and
            (3) establish reasonable timelines for the exchange of 
        information between the National Telecommunications and 
        Information Administration and the Federal Communications 
        Commission in order to maintain effective spectrum coordination 
        and collaboration.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 5, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2501

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

      To require the National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration and the Federal Communications Commission to update the 
         memorandum of understanding on spectrum coordination.
```
254 La. 752

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eugene J. REDD.

No. 50111.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 29, 1969.

The application is denied. In view of the response made by the district judge, the showing made in the instant case does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. See State v. Paternos-tro, 224 La. 87, 68 So.2d 767 (1963).