alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66130-66131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    Notice is hereby given that on November 25, 1997, a proposed 
Consent Decree in United States versus M & O Environmental Company, et 
al., Civil No. 1:96-CV-1786, was lodged with the United States District 
Court for the Northern District of Illinois. This Consent Decree 
resolves claims against M & O Environmental Company, Inc. (``M & O''), 
for violations of Sections 112 and 114 of the Clean Air Act (``Act''), 
42 U.S.C. Secs. 7412 and 7414, and various work practice standards and 
notice requirements promulgated as part of the National Emission 
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for asbestos (``asbestos 
NESHAP'').
    The Consent Decree requires M & O (1) pay $100,000 in civil 
penalties; (2) maintain compliance with the asbestos NESHAP and the 
Act; (3) report to EPA on a monthly basis the status of all asbestos 
abatement work undertaken by M & O in the previous month, and (4) 
implement certain managerial and operational measurements to ensure M & 
O's continuous compliance with the asbestos NESHAP and the Act.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General 
of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of 
Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer in United States 
versus M & O Environmental Company, et al., D.J. Ref. 90-5-2-1-1885.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, Northern District of Illinois, Everett McKinley 
Dirksen Building, Fifth Floor, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago 
Illinois 60604, at the Region V Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 200 West Adams Street, Chicago, Illinois, and at the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 
(202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained 
in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, 
N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please 
enclose a check in the amount of $26.75 (25 cents

[[Page 66131]]

per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-32905 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### Henry Bruce BOWEN and Elna Baggett Bowen, Petitioners, v. Judy POLE, the Intervenor and natural mother of Clifton Kelly Brooks, Respondent.

No. 43310.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1973.

Cause dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ„ concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00460-CR

Rodolpho Cipriano Gomez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 

NO. CR2003-159, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

In 2005, a jury convicted appellant Rodolpho Cipriano Gomez of the offense of 

engaging in a criminal activity, see Tex. Penal Code § 71.02(a)(5), and the district court 

sentenced him to sixty years’ imprisonment. This Court affirmed the judgment of conviction on 

appeal. See Gomez v. State, No. 03-05-00842-CR, 2008 WL 4603574, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin 

Oct. 16, 2008, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Earlier this year, Cipriano 

Gomez filed a pro se motion for judgment nunc pro tunc in the trial court. See Blanton v. 

State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 897-98 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (explaining purpose of nunc pro tunc 

judgment is to allow correction of clerical errors when there is discrepancy between judgment

pronounced in court and judgment reflected in record). The trial court denied the motion. 

Cipriano Gomez has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order.

In response, the State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that we 

lack jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order. We agree. “The standard for determining
2

jurisdiction is . . . whether the appeal is authorized by law.” Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 

696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (citing Tex. Const. art. V, § 6(a)). In criminal cases, an appeal is 

authorized only when a trial court “enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.” Tex. R. 

App. Proc. 25.2(a)(2); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02. Cipriano Gomez filed a response to the 

motion to dismiss, relying on the Texas Court of Criminals Appeals’ decision in Blanton to argue 

that a nunc pro tunc judgment is an appealable order. See Blanton, 369 S.W.3d at 903-04. 

However, Cipriano Gomez does not appeal from a nunc pro tunc judgment issued after the trial 

court granted a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc—he appeals from the trial court’s order 

denying his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. An order denying a judgment nunc pro tunc 

does not result in a new judgment and is not an appealable order. See, e.g., Abbott, 271 S.W.3d 

at 697; Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); see also Aleman 

v. State, No. 03-14-00576-CR, 2014 WL 5656540, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 29, 2014, no 

pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal in similar case).

Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 6, 2020

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 26, 2011 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| *May 4,   2011* | * * | By:                                               | */s/James   F. Conway III* |
|----------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Date                 |     | James   F. Conway III                             |
|                 |     | Chairman,   President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
Exhibit 32(b)


               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Mark E. Maddocks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



December 14, 2009            /s/ Mark E. Maddocks
                         _____________________________________
                         Mark E. Maddocks
                         Vice President, Finance and
                         Chief Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Dataram Corporation and will be retained by Dataram
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Review of Conference Grants (R13s) and Conference 
Cooperative Agreements (U13s) Telephone Conference Call.
    Date: January 9, 1998.
    Time: 2:30 p.m.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
North Campus, Building 4401, Room 3446, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carol Shreffler, National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-1445.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Grant 
applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Agents; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation; 93.894, Resource and Manpower Development, National 
Institutes of Health)

    Dated: December 17, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-33491 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-056-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
DEBENTURE EXTENSION - Goldstein

  
 iWallet Corporation | 7394 Trade Street | San Diego, CA 92196-3418 | (800) 508-5042
  
 July 13, 2021
  
 To: iWallet Debenture Holders
  
 Dear Sir/Madam:
  
 We refer to the secured convertible debentures issued by iWallet Corporation (the “Company”), dated April 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 (the “Debenture”) issued to the undersigned debentureholder (the “Debentureholder”). The Company is requesting permission to extend the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture) until April 30, 2022. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Debenture.
  
 The Company and the Debentureholder hereby amends the Debentures as follows:
  
 1. Each reference to the Maturity Date in the Debenture shall be amended to reflect “April 30, 2022”.
  
 All other terms of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect unamended and time shall continue to be of the essence.
  
 If you are in agreement with the terms and conditions of this letter, please sign and return to my attention.
  
 Yours truly,
  
 IWALLET CORPORATION
  
 By: /s/ Steve Cabouli
 “Authorized Signing Officer”
  
 The undersigned hereby acknowledges and consents to the above noted amendment, extending the Maturity Date until April 30, 2022.
  
 	 If Debentureholder is a corporation, trust, partnership or other entity:
	  
	 If Debentureholder is an individual:

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 /s/ Richard Goldstein

	 Name of Entity
	  
	 Signature

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 Richard Goldstein

	 Signature of Person Signing
	  
	 Name of Individual

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  

	 Title of Person Signing
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 239 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for limitations on copayments for contraception furnished by the 

Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 239 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Access to Con3 traception for Veterans Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON COPAYMENTS FOR CONTRACEP5 TION. 

6 Section 1722A(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘to pay’’ and all that follows 

9 through the period and inserting ‘‘to pay—’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraphs: 

12 ‘‘(A) an amount in excess of the cost to the 

13 Secretary for medication described in paragraph (1); 

14 or 

15 ‘‘(B) an amount for any contraceptive item for 

16 which coverage under health insurance coverage is 

17 required without the imposition of any cost-sharing 

18 requirement pursuant to section 2713(a)(4) of the 

19 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg– 

20 13(a)(4)).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99

 

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of A.T. Cross Company, a Rhode Island corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B).
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,583
<SECURITIES>                                    57,136
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,044)
<INVENTORY>                                     33,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,937
<PP&E>                                          90,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                (43,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,146
<SALES>                                        117,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,000
<CGS>                                           41,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,736
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,316
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,316
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<FN> 
<F1>
BASIC EPS AS REQUIRED BY FAS 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.10


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO

PROMISSORY NOTE


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO
PROMISSORY NOTE, entered into on October 8, 2021 (this “Amendment”), is made to the Promissory Note dated
April 16, 2020 (as previously amended as of March 11, 2021, the “Original Note”), executed by ONS Acquisition
Corp., a Cayman Islands exempted company (“Maker”), as maker thereof, payable to the order of ONS Acquisition
Management LLC (“Payee”).


 


Recitals. Payee,
as the current legal and equitable owner and holder, and the payee, of the Original Note, and Maker desire to amend the Original Note
to extend the maturity date of the Note to September 20, 2022.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises, covenants and agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Maker and Payee agree as follows:


 


SECTION 1.Definitions.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings and uses assigned in the Original Note; and the term “Note”
when used in this Amendment means the Original Note, as amended hereby.


 


SECTION 2.Amendment.
The date “September 30, 2020” in sections 1 and 3 of the Original Note which was previously amended to be “September
20, 2021” is hereby further amended and restated to read “September 20, 2022.”


 


SECTION 3.Governing
Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the law of the State of New York.


 


SECTION 4.Confirmation.
Except as expressly set forth herein, the Original Note is ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect
in accordance with its terms.


 


SECTION 5.Successors
and Assigns. This Amendment is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Maker and Payee and their respective successors
and assigns permitted by the Note, except Maker may not assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder other
than as provided in the Note.


 


SECTION 6.Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and by each party hereto on separate counterparts, each of which counterpart
when so executed shall be an original, but all such counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. A counterpart
signature page delivered by fax or internet transmission shall be as effective as delivery of an originally executed counterpart.


 


[Remainder of Page Left Intentionally Blank]


  



     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have caused this Second Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by their respective proper and duly authorized officers on, and effective
as of, the first date set forth above.


 


	 	MAKER:
	 	 
	 	ONS ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Alexander Crutchfield
	 	Name: 	Alexander Crutchfield
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 
	 	PAYEE:
	 	 
	 	ONS ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Frank Bachinsky
	 	Name:	 Frank Bachinsky
	 	Title:	Manager



 


 


Signature Page to Second
Amendment to

Promissory Note
No. 00-7576.

#### Pierce *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Technical Information Service


NTIS Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: National Technical Information Service, Technology 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that the National Technical Information 
Service Advisory Board (the ``Board'') will meet on Tuesday, January 6, 
1998, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. The session will be closed to the 
public.
    The Board was established under the authority of 15 U.S.C. 
3704b(c), and was Chartered on September 15, 1989. The Board is 
composed of five members appointed by the Secretary of Commerce who are 
eminent in such fields as information resources management, information 
technology, and library and information services. The purpose of the 
meeting is to review the draft strategic plan and make recommendations 
regarding general policies and operations of NTIS, including policies 
in connection with fees and charges for its services. The agenda will 
be devoted to a discussion of NTIS' long range plans. The session will 
be closed because premature disclosure of the information to be 
discussed would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of 
NTIS' business plans.

DATES: The meeting will convene on January 6, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. and 
adjourn at 1:00 p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held in Room 2029 Sills Building, National 
Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, 
Virginia 22161.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Lucas, NTIS Advisory Board 
Secretary, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal 
Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Telephone: (703) 605-6400; Fax (703) 
487-4093.

    Dated: December 9, 1997.
Donald R. Johnson,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-32614 Filed 12-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-04-M