alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ricardo MESA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 11, 1970.

Ricardo Mesa, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARK-DULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of *320the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67362-67363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5940-01]


Notice of Open Meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory 
Board on February 10-11, 1998

    The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Environmental Financial 
Advisory Board (EFAB) will hold an open meeting of the full Board on 
February 10-11, 1998. The meeting will be held at the National Press 
Club, 13th Floor in the Holeman Lounge, 14th and F Streets, NW, 
Washington, DC. The February 10 session will run from 9 am to 5 pm, 
while the February 11 session will run from 8:15 am to 11 am.
    EFAB is chartered with providing analysis and advice to the EPA

[[Page 67363]]

Administrator on environmental finance. The purpose of this meeting is 
to discuss work products under EFAB's current strategic action agenda 
and to develop an action agenda to direct the Board's activities over 
the remainder of this year and into 1999. Environmental financing 
topics expected to be discussed include: cost effective environmental 
management, community-based environmental protection, brownfields 
redevelopment, Drinking Water State Revolving Funds, and small business 
access to capital.
    The meeting will be open to the public, but seating is limited. For 
further information, please contact Alecia Crichlow, U.S. EPA on 202-
564-5188, or Joanne Lynch, U.S. EPA on 202-564-4999.

    Dated: December 11, 1997.
Jack Shipley,
Acting Comptroller.
[FR Doc. 97-33610 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7196

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus CALVERNE LYKE, JR., a/k/a Butch, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (2:03-cr-10074; 7:06-cv-00058) Submitted: October 27, 2006 Decided: November 9, 2006 Before WILLIAMS and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calverne Lyke, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Rebecca Bockhorst, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Calverne Lyke, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lyke has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 21****SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**1. Swift Transportation Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation2. Swift Leasing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation3. Common Market Distributing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation4. Sparks Finance Co., Inc., a Nevada corporation5. Cooper Motor Lines, Inc., a South Carolina corporation6. Common Market Equipment Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation7. Swift Transportation Co. of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation8. Swift Logistics Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation9. Swift Transportation Corporation, a Nevada corporation10. Swift Receivables Corporation, a Delaware corporation11. M.S. Carriers, Inc., a Tennessee corporation12. M.S. Carriers Warehousing & Distribution, Inc., a Tennessee corporation13. M.S. Carriers Logistics de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation14 Swift Transportation of Puerto Rico, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation15. TransMex, Inc. S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation16. Mohave Transportation Captive Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation17. Swift Intermodal Ltd., a Nevada corporation18. Swift International S.A. de C.V.19. TMX Administracion S.A. de C.V.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the "Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and I, Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated: December 18, 2008



|/s/ MICHAEL I. GERMAN
|---------------------

Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President







|/s/ FIROUZEH SARHANGI
|---------------------

Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CRYO-CELL International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mercedes Walton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Jill M. Taymans, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mercedes WaltonMercedes WaltonInterim Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2005/s/ Jill M. TaymansJill M. TaymansVice President, Finance (Chief Financial Officer)March 30, 2005
#### Barbara SMITH, Appellant, v. DIAMOND O MEAT PACKING CORPORATION, a corporation, and Travelers Insurance Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. R-129.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Tom C. Meers, of Horner & Meers, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Edna L. Caruso, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0640

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM203AD

BOMBARDIER RB211-NAC-71-018, R1 --- 5/10/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joe GUTIERREZ.

No. 61413.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

In re: Joe Gutierrez, applying for supervisory writs.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy by review in the event of conviction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                1,204
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         8,952
<ALLOWANCES>                            114
<INVENTORY>                             675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     11,539
<PP&E>                                2,944
<DEPRECIATION>                          116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       18,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 4,067
<BONDS>                               4,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  8
<OTHER-SE>                            7,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         18,281
<SALES>                               9,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      9,655
<CGS>                                 2,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         2,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      4,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       2,008
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,008
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .15
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7006 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to waive the application of 

certain conditions of payment and conditions of participation for home 

health services furnished in an emergency area during an emergency 

period, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2020 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Ms. JACKSON LEE, 

Mr. NADLER, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. MCGOVERN, 

Mr. ESPAILLAT, and Ms. MENG) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to waive the 

application of certain conditions of payment and conditions of participation for home health services furnished 

in an emergency area during an emergency period, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Care in 

5 Home Health Agencies Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7006 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN 

2 CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT AND CONDITIONS 

3 OF PARTICIPATION FOR HOME HEALTH 

4 SERVICES FURNISHED IN AN EMERGENCY 

5 AREA DURING AN EMERGENCY PERIOD. 

6 Section 1135(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1320b–5) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (7), by striking at the end 

9 ‘‘and’’; 

10 (2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting the following new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(9) in the case of a home health service (as de14 fined in section 1861(m)) and the home health agen15 cy documents the receipt of verbal orders issued by 

16 the physician, nurse practitioner, physician assist17 ant, or clinical nurse specialist, as appropriate, with 

18 respect to such home health service, conditions of 

19 payment or conditions of participation that would 

20 otherwise require written— 

21 ‘‘(A) signed and dated plan of treatment; 

22 ‘‘(B) orders for care; 

23 ‘‘(C) certification of benefit eligibility; or 

24 ‘‘(D) documentation of a face-to-face en25 counter.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Columbus, Ohio, a corporation, Appellant, v. Charlie Junior SHEPPARD, Appellee.

No. 69-268.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 31, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the annual
period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Christopher M. Mathieu, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|                           |                         |  |  | 
|-------------------------- | ----------------------- |  |  | 
|                           |                         | 
|/s/ Christopher M. Mathieu |                         | 
|Name:                      | Christopher M. Mathieu  |  | 
|Title:                     | Chief Financial Officer |  | 



Date: March 13, 2012
Exhibit 32(b)


            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                          (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Mark E. Maddocks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



March 16, 2010            /s/ Mark E. Maddocks
                         _____________________________________
                         Mark E. Maddocks
                         Vice President, Finance and
                         Chief Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Dataram Corporation and will be retained by Dataram
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
I, Amy Vidrine Samson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 27, 2004 of Crown Crafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date:  August 11, 2004 /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson   Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
V 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2272 

To authorize the Coast Guard to issue a certificate of documentation with 

a coastwise endorsement for the vessel WIDGEON, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2021 

Mr. BERGMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Coast Guard to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for the vessel 

WIDGEON, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COASTWISE ENDORSEMENT. 

4 Notwithstanding sections 12112 of title 46, United 

5 States Code, the Secretary of the department in which the 

6 Coast Guard is operating may issue a certificate of docu7 mentation with a coastwise endorsement for the vessel 

8 WIDGEON (United States official number 1299656). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**964 CA 11-02438** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

KIMBERLY MITCHELL CONVERSE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC., DOLE FRESH FRUIT COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND LEONARD’S EXPRESS, INC., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA LLC, BUFFALO (R. ANTHONY RUPP, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

CANTOR, DOLCE & PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (STEPHEN C. HALPERN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Thomas M. Van Strydonck, J.), entered September 6, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendants Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Fresh Fruit Company for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when the tractor-trailer she was operating was involved in a one-vehicle rollover accident. Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Fresh Fruit Company (collectively, defendants) were negligent in the manner in which they loaded the cargo that she was hauling, i.e., approximately 40,000 pounds of bananas. Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Although defendants established their entitlement to judgment by establishing that the load was less than the maximum allowable weight under federal law and that the contents were secured to prevent shifting during transit, we nevertheless conclude that plaintiff raised an issue of fact based on expert opinion sufficient to defeat the motion ( see generally Zuckerman v City of New York

, 49 NY2d 557, 562).

We reject defendants’ contention that the affidavit of one of plaintiff’s experts, a mechanical engineer, is speculative and conclusory. That expert opined that the static stability level of the tractor-trailer was “unusually low,” thereby creating a high center of gravity and an increased risk of a rollover accident. Although there**-2- 964 CA 11-02438** 

are no industry standards regarding the static stability level, he relied on the results of tilt-table tests conducted at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (Institute), which evaluated the static stability level of the vehicle that plaintiff was operating, and, inter alia, research conducted at the Institute regarding the increased potential for rollover accidents involving vehicles with a static stability level below a certain level ( see Edwards v St. Elizabeth Med. Ctr.

, 72 AD3d 1595, 1596). In light of our determination that plaintiff raised an issue of fact, we need not address defendants’ remaining contentions with respect to the affidavit of plaintiff’s second expert.

Entered: September 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-133224 on Form
S-3 of our report dated March 2, 2007, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph for the change in accounting method in 2004 for long-duration contracts to
conform to Statement of Position 03-1 Accounting and Reporting by
Insurance Enterprises for Certain Non-Traditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate
Accounts) relating to the financial statements of ML Life Insurance Company of New York,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ML Life Insurance Company of New York for
the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 23, 2007