alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                               Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Escalon Medical Corp. (the "Company"), that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: September 24, 2002                         /s/  Harry M. Rimmer
      ------------------                         --------------------
                                                 Harry M. Rimmer
                                                 Senior Vice President - Finance
                                                 (Principal Financial and
                                                 Accounting Officer)
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2535 

To prohibit Federal funds from being used to violate the terms of the 

Flores settlement agreement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2021 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. MEEKS, 

Ms. CHU, and Mr. SUOZZI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being used to violate the 

terms of the Flores settlement agreement, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Flores 

5 Agreement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLORES SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. 

7 No Federal funds may be used to violate the terms 

8 of the stipulated settlement agreement filed on January 

9 17, 1997, in the United States District Court for the CenVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:01 Jun 07, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2535.IH H2535

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2535 IH

1 tral District of California in Flores v. Reno, CV 85–4544– 

2 RJK (commonly known as the ‘‘Flores settlement agree3 ment’’). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                            COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Nine Months Ended
                                         September 30,                         Year Ended December 31,
                                     ---------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------
                                       1997        1996        1996         1995        1994        1993        1992
                                     ---------   ---------   ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
 <S>                                 <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
 Interest Expense                    $  70,300   $ 109,800   $ 142,100    $ 151,000   $  73,300   $  80,900   $  92,500
 Estimated Interest Portion
   of Rent Expense                      14,398      13,668      17,362       16,865      19,289      20,701      16,178
                                     ---------   ---------   ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
 Fixed Charges                       $  84,698   $ 123,468   $ 159,462    $ 167,865   $  92,589   $ 101,601   $ 108,678
                                     =========   =========   =========    =========   =========   =========   =========

 Income From Continuing
   Operations Before Income Taxes    $ 460,900   $ 408,700   $ 558,000    $ 478,000   $ 504,700   $ 506,000   $ 392,100

 Add:     Fixed Charges                 84,698     123,468     159,462      167,865      92,589     101,601     108,678

          Dividends From Less Than  
          50% Owned Companies                          237         359          968         835       2,395       2,278

 Less:    Equity in Earnings
          of Less Than 50% Owned
          Companies                       (202)     (1,004)     (1,281)      (1,000)     (1,900)     (1,200)     (1,900)
                                     ---------   ---------   ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
 Earnings Before Fixed Charges       $ 545,396   $ 531,401   $ 716,540    $ 645,833   $ 596,224   $ 608,796   $ 501,156
                                     =========   =========   =========    =========   =========   =========   =========
 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges       6.4x        4.3x        4.5x         3.8x        6.4x        6.0x        4.6x
</TABLE>
Summary of the 

Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018

The Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) expands the 

jurisdiction of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to address 

growing national security concerns over foreign exploitation of certain investment structures 

which traditionally have fallen outside of CFIUS jurisdiction. Additionally, FIRRMA 

modernizes CFIUS’s processes to better enable timely and effective reviews of covered 

transactions.

Key Provisions of FIRRMA:

• Expands the scope of covered transactions—FIRRMA broadens the purview of CFIUS 

by explicitly adding four new types of covered transactions: (1) a purchase, lease, or 

concession by or to a foreign person of real estate located in proximity to sensitive 

government facilities; (2) “other investments” in certain U.S. businesses that afford a 

foreign person access to material nonpublic technical information in the possession of the 

U.S. business, membership on the board of directors, or other decision-making rights, 

other than through voting of shares; (3) any change in a foreign investor’s rights resulting 

in foreign control of a U.S. business or an “other investment” in certain U.S. businesses; 

and (4) any other transaction, transfer, agreement, or arrangement designed to circumvent 

CFIUS jurisdiction.

• Declarations—Provides for an abbreviated filing or “light filing” process through a new 

“declarations” procedure that could result in shorter review timelines. It also allows 

CFIUS some discretion to require parties to file with CFIUS before closing a transaction.

• Expands CFIUS’s timelines—Expands CFIUS’s review period from 30 to 45 days and 

allows an investigation to be extended for an additional 15-day period under 

extraordinary circumstances. 

• Mitigation—Strengthens requirements on the use of mitigation agreements, including the 

addition of compliance plans to inform the use of such agreements.

• Special hiring authority and funding—Grants special hiring authority for CFIUS and 

establishes a fund for collection of new CFIUS filing fees. 

• Delayed effective date and pilot programs—Delays the applicability of some of the 

bill’s most significant provisions until 18 months following enactment of FIRRMA or 30 

days after the Secretary of the Treasury publishes in the Federal Register a determination 

that the necessary regulations, organizational structure, personnel, and other resources are 

in place to administer those provisions, whichever is sooner. This section also authorizes 

CFIUS to conduct pilot programs to implement any authority provided under this bill.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6028
NEIL FRANCIS COHEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LLOYD WATERS, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-143-HAR) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Neil Francis Cohen, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gary Eugene Bair, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cohen v. Waters , No. CA-94-143-HAR (D. Md. Nov. 29, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0641

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

GILBERT CAMPA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 5 2023

06/05/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0641
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2009

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/24 12/29 1/2 25.00 28.00 28.00 73.00 8.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 12/31 1/5 1/8 25.00 28.00 28.00 69.00 12.00

1/8 1/12 1/15 20.00 28.00 28.00 63.00 13.00

1/15 1/20 1/22 12.00 28.00 28.00 25.00 63.00 30.00

1/22 1/26 1/29 12.00 28.00 28.00 73.00 -5.00

1/29 2/2 2/5 20.00 30.00 29.00 76.00 3.00

2/5 2/9 2/12 30.00 30.00 29.00 72.00 17.00

2/12 2/16 2/19 30.00 30.00 29.00 25.00 66.00 48.00

2/19 2/24 2/26 30.00 30.00 29.00 66.00 23.00

2/26 3/2 3/5 30.00 30.00 29.00 73.00 16.00

3/5 3/9 3/12 20.00 30.00 29.00 82.00 -3.00

3/12 3/16 3/19 15.00 30.00 29.00 25.00 84.00 15.00

3/19 3/23 3/26 15.00 30.00 29.00 84.00 -10.00

1036.00 944.00 167.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

13-DAY BILL 12/31 1/2 50.00 50.00 0.00

Matures 1/15

7-DAY BILL 1/7 1/8 15.00 15.00 0.00

Matures 1/15

64-DAY BILL 2/11 2/12 35.00 35.00 0.00

Matures 4/17

56-DAY BILL 2/17 2/18 35.00 35.00 0.00

Matures 4/15

18-DAY BILL 2/25 2/26 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 3/16

14-DAY BILL 3/2 3/3 20.00 20.00 0.00

Matures 3/17

OTHER CMBs TO OFFSET MATURING DEBT OF FED'S SFP PROGRAM 286.00 286.00 0.00

CMB Funds excluding SFP Program: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

3-Year Note 1/5 1/7 1/15 30.00

10-Year Note® 1/5 1/7 1/15 10.00

10-Year TIPS 1/5 1/8 1/15 8.00 33.00 -15.00

20-Year TIPS 1/22 1/27 2/2 10.00

2-Year Note 1/26 1/28 2/2 42.00 2.00

5-Year Note 1/26 1/29 2/2 30.00 2.00 20.00 62.00

3-Year Note 2/4 2/9 2/16 30.00

10-Year Note 2/4 2/10 2/16 20.00

30-Year Bond 2/4 2/11 2/16 15.00 7.00 55.00 10.00

2-Year Note 2/19 2/24 3/2 42.00

5-year Note 2/19 2/25 3/2 30.00 20.00 52.00

3-Year Note 3/9 3/11 3/16 30.00 30.00

10-Year Note® 3/9 3/11 3/16 15.00 14.50 0.50

30-Year Bond® 3/9 3/11 3/16 10.00

2-Year Note 3/23 3/25 3/31 42.00

5-year Note 3/23 3/26 3/31 30.00 20.00 52.00

394.00 162.50 161.50

Estimates are italicized. Shaded regions in Cash Management Section denote funds raised for Supplementary Financing Program

SFP funds are not technically marketable Treasury borrowing NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 328.50

R = Reopening
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50317 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALICIA CHAVEZ-CAMPOS, also known as Sandra Maria Hernandez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-2288

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alicia ChavezCampos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Vanessa.

I don’t mean to be a pest, but I think I’ve found 2 other items which I believe were inadvertent error s in the proposed Montana visibility FIP. I assume they can be corrected with minimum effort. Here are my thoughts:

1. PM Emission Limit for Ash Grove

– Formula. The particulate emission limit proposed for Ash Gro ve [ § 52.1396(c)(2) – page 296] was taken from Montana’s ‘process weight’ rule (ARM 17.8.310) . The formula for cases in which the process weight is greater than 30 tons/hour was lis ted as:
E = 55.0p 0.11

The formula should read:
E = 55.0p 0.11 – 40

The formula appears (incorrectly) on pages 76, 284 and 296.

The formula for cases in which the process feed to the kiln is less than 30 tons per hour is listed
correctly as: E=4.10p 0.67

.

2. NOx and SO 2 Emission Limit for Holcim

– Inconsistent numbers.

The NOx and SO 2 emission limits for Holcim are shown in § 52.1396(c)(2) (page 296) as:

NOx = 5.5 lb/ton clinker A couple of other inadvertent items regarding Monta na proposed visibility FIP

Hal Robbins

to:
Vanessa Hinkle

03/22/2012 09:22 AM

Hide Details From: Hal Robbins <hrobbins@bison-eng.com>

To: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been replied to and forwa rded. Page 1 of 2

7/17/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\vhinkle\Local Sett ings\Temp\notes7A42A6\~web6058.htmSO 2 = 1.3 lb/ton clinker.

These numbers are consistent with the values in the discussion of BART. The SO 2 limit is

discussed on page 93 (1.3 lb/ton) while the NOx lim it is discussed on page 84 (5.5 lb/ton).

However, the discussion found in “Proposed Action” (Section VI.B, page 285) shows different

values. It lists NOx as 7.0 and SO 2 as 0.63 lb/ton of clinker. I assume these values w ere inadvertently placed in this section. The 5.5 and 1 .3 values appear, to me, to be the correct

values.

Give me a call or email if you have any questions o r if I’m out in left field.

Hal Robbins

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Harold W Robbins,
President Bison Engineering Inc.
1400 11th Ave Helena, MT 59601

406 442-5768
406 449-6653 - FAX
406 431-0249 - Cell Page 2 of 2

7/17/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\vhinkle\Local Sett ings\Temp\notes7A42A6\~web6058.htm
No. 00-5458.

#### Clarke *v.*United States,

*ante,*p. 905. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
#### PIRANHA BOAT CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Baldwin L. SYMONETTE, Appellee.

No. 72-1300.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 14, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Draft Department of the Interior and Department of Health and 
Human Services Internal Agency Procedures Manual for Contracting Under 
Title I of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The congress has declared that each provision of the Indian 
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Act) and each 
provision of contracts entered into thereunder shall be liberally 
construed for the benefit of the Indian tribes or tribal organizations 
(T/TO). To carry out this policy, the Department of the Interior and 
Department of Health and Human Services Internal Agency Procedures 
Manual for Contracting Under Title I of the Indian Self-Determination 
and Education Assistance Act (Manual) was drafted to facilitate and 
enhance contracting with T/TOs under Title I of the Act, as amended, 25 
U.S.C. 450 et seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 25 CFR 
part 900 (published in the Federal Register on June 24, 1996, and 
effective on August 23, 1996). The public is invited to review and 
comment on the draft Manual.

DATES: All written comments on the Manual should be submitted by 
January 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments must be addressed to: Merry L. Elrod, 
Office of Tribal Programs, Indian Health Service, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Room 6A-05, Rockville, Maryland 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information and/or to 
receive copies of the manual and letter dated October 30, 1997, to 
tribal leaders and other interested parties inviting comments on the 
draft Manual, the public may contact either: James Thomas, Division of 
Self-Determination Services, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1949 C Street, 
NW. , MS 4603-MIB, Washington, D.C., 20240, telephone 202/208-5727, or 
Merry Elrod, Office of Tribal Programs, Indian Health Service, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Parklawn Building, Room 6A-05, Rockville, MD, 20857, 
telephone 301/443-1044.

    Dated: December 9, 1997.
Hilda A. Manuel,
Deputy Commissioner of Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-32696 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
#### Curtis BENTON, Jr., M.D., Petitioner, v. Zulamita WICKUM, Respondent. The EMPLOYERS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner, v. Zulamita WICKUM, Respondent.

Nos. 69-636, 69-760.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 20, 1970.

James E. Tribble, of Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, for petitioners.

Robert Orseck of Podhurst & Orseck, Miami, and Ferrero & Middlebrooks, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied on authority of Shingleton v. Bussey, Fla.1969, 223 So.2d 713; Duran v. McPherson, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 233 So.2d 639, opinion filed March 6, 1970; Shipman v. Kinderman, First District Court of Appeal, 232 So.2d *64121, opinion filed February 24, 1970; and Beta Eta House Corporation v. Gregory, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 495.

McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., and DRIVER, B. J., Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of OFS Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Glenn R. Pittson, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





|      | /s/ Glenn R. Pittson
|----- | --------------------
|Name: | Glenn R. Pittson    
|Date: | March 17, 2014
Exhibit 32



FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 
10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2009 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

David G. Whalen, the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin F. Mahoney, the Chief Financial Officer of A.T. Cross Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and                                                         
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                            
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of A.T. Cross Company.

|Date:  November 10, 2009 | DAVID G. WHALEN        
|------------------------ | -----------------------
|                         | David G. Whalen        
|                         | Chief Executive Officer
|                         |                        
|                         |                        
|                         | Kevin F. Mahoney       
|                         | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                      858,256
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                             2,639,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                 66,558
<INVENTORY>                              47,891,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         53,628,043
<PP&E>                                   31,283,189
<DEPRECIATION>                           16,220,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           73,512,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    54,974,147
<BONDS>                                   4,750,000
<COMMON>                                  1,552,462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0 
<OTHER-SE>                                3,415,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             73,512,295
<SALES>                                  81,722,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         81,644,969
<CGS>                                    55,319,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         30,890,194  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        1,976,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (6,541,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (6,541,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (4.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (4.23) 


</TABLE>