alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  John Ask / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6 th Floor        | 100 White Clay Center, Suite 102 |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Newark, DE  19711 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets, LLC |
| Attn:  John Ask                       | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 12 th Floor, MC 482-B12-C24 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
#### Norman WRIGHT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-842.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 27, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was tried without a jury on the charge of robbery. He was convicted of such crime and sentenced to a term of seven years in the state penitentiary.

He seeks reversal of the judgment of conviction on the grounds that the identification of appellant should have been suppressed and that the evidence was not sufficient to prove his guilt beyond and to the exclusion of a reasonable doubt.

*36The grounds relied on by the appellant for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we have found no reversible error. The record discloses that the case was fairly tried and that the judgment is supported by the evidence. No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.
258 La. 573

#### Jack P. F. GREMILLION, Attorney General of the State of Louisiana for the Use and Benefit of Dale Patricia Pendergast STONE, et al. v. J. B. LANCASTER, Legislative Auditor of the State of Louisiana.

No. 51330.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1971.

In re: Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of the State of Louisiana and for the use and benefit of Dale Patricia Pen-dergast Stone, et al. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 244 So.2d 862.

Writ refused. There is no error of law in the judgment under the facts found by the Court of Appeal.
OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS • 1500 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. • WASHINGTON, D.C. • 20220 • 

FOR RELEASE AT 3 p.m. Contact: Jon Murchinson

January 30, 1995 (202) 622-2960

TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET BORROWING 

ESTIMATES

The Treasury Department on Monday announced that its net market 

borrowing for the January-March 1995 quarter is estimated to be $93.7 billion, with 

a $20 billion cash balance on March 31. The Treasury also announced that a 

paydown of $5 billion to $10 billion of marketable securities is estimated for the 

April-June 1995 quarter, with a $35 billion cash balance at the end of June.

Market borrowing in the January-March quarter in part reflects paydowns 

of about $10-1/4 billion of nonmarketable Treasury securities, the settlement of 

December 2- and 5year notes and payment of December 31 interest totaling about 

$10 billion on January 3, and the shift of payments totaling about $7 billion from 

Saturday, April 1, to Friday, March 31. In the quarterly announcement of its 

borrowing needs on October 31, 1994, the Treasury estimated net market borrowing 

during the January-March 1995 quarter to be in a range of $65 billion to $70 billion, 

assuming a $20 billion cash balance on March 31. The increase in the current 

borrowing estimate, compared with the prior estimate, is attributable to lower 

receipts and higher outlays.

Actual net market borrowing in the quarter ended December 31, 1994, was $61.2 

billion, while the end-of-quarter cash balance was $26.6 billion. On October 31, the 

Treasury had estimated net market borrowing for the October-December quarter to be 

$59.6 billion, with a $30 billion cash balance on December 31. The lower-than-expected 

end-of-December cash balance reflected a reduction in receipts, while actual market 

borrowing was little changed from the October 31 estimate.

RR-41
#### Hendrik W. VIETOR, Appellant, v. Margaret A. SILL and George M. Crandall, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-245.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1973.

G. H. Martin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The primary law of this case was established via interlocutory appeal in our opinion reported as Vietor v. Sill, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 198, when it was stated at page 199:

> “There is no requirement of a binding contract between the apartment seller *174and a third party to activate the other apartment owners’ preemptive rights under the agreement. When the defendant notified the other owners of her 'intention’ to sell and the terms and conditions demanded, the other apartment owners then became entitled to buy on those terms. And when one of them agreed to the stated terms and conditions and tendered performance, the defendant became obligated to sell.”

An examination of the record and particularly the terms of the appealed final judgment reveals that the able trial judge misapprehended the effect of this holding and thereafter imposed a larger and different burden upon plaintiff. All circumstances considered, it is our opinion that the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded with respectful instructions to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff as prayed.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

WALDEN, OWEN, and MAGER, JJ„ concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                STATE OF
        SUBSIDIARY                                            INCORPORATION
        ----------                                            -------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Accelerated Claims Processing, Inc.                               Delaware
401 Park Avenue South
New York, NY  10016


Quality Medi-Cal Adjudication, Incorporated                       California
10381 Old Placerville Road
Sacramento, CA  95827


Health Care Microsystems, Inc.                                    California
200 North Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 600
El Segundo, CA 90245


CDR Associates, Inc.                                              Maryland
9642 Deereco Road
Timonium, MD  21093


Health Receivables Management, Inc.                               Delaware
820 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 725
Chicago, IL  60607


HSA Managed Care Systems, Inc.                                    Delaware
234 Spring Lake Drive
Itasca, IL 60143 - 3203
</TABLE>
Exhibit
4.84


 


Summary
of the Private Instrument of Commitment to Purchase and Sale of Real Property, entered into on September 1, 2021, in connection with
Fazenda Rio do Meio.


 


Parties:
Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuáiria Ltda., as Seller; Francisco Ferreira Camacho, as Buyer; and Brasilagro Companhia Brasileira
de Propriedades Agrícolas and Agrifirma Agro Ltda. as intervening-consenting parties.


 


Purpose: The
commitment to sell a total area of 3,230.34 hectares, of which 2,859.34 hectares are arable and 371 hectares which still do not
have a vegetation clearance license, to be originated from Fazenda Rio do Meio, for the total price, in Brazilian national currency (Reais),
equivalent to 714,835 bags of soybeans, to be paid as follows: (i) the first installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent
to 107,224.55 bags of soybeans shall be paid 33% on September 20, 2021, 33% on November 15, 2021 and 33% on December 30, 2021; (ii) the
second installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 21,445.84 bags of soybeans shall be paid on June 10, 2022;
(iii) the third installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 14,296.61 bags of soybeans shall be paid on October
10, 2022; (iv) the fourth installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 57,187.36 bags of soybeans shall be paid
on June 10, 2023; (v) the fifth installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 40,039.05 bags of soybeans shall
be paid on October 10, 2023; (vi) the sixth installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 85.779.64 bags of soybeans
shall be paid on June 10, 2024; (vii) the seventh installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 78,631.34 bags
of soybeans shall be paid on October 10, 2024; (viii) the eight installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 85,779.64
bags of soybeans shall be paid on June 10, 2025; (ix) the ninth installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 78,631.34
bags of soybeans shall be paid on October 10, 2025; (x) the tenth installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to
50,038.13 bags of soybeans shall be paid on June 10, 2026; (xi) the eleventh installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent
to 42,889.82 bags of soybeans shall be paid on October 10, 2026; (xii) the twelfth installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais,
equivalent to 21,445.84 bags of soybeans shall be paid on June 10, 2027; and (xiii) the thirteenth installment in the amount, in Brazilian
Reais, equivalent to 21,445.84 bags of soybeans shall be paid on October 10, 2027. In the event the vegetation clearance license
corresponding to 371 hectares is granted, an additional price, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 37,100 bags of soybeans shall
be added to the terms and conditions of the transaction.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2435 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2435

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the label 
  of a drug that is intended for human use and contains an ingredient 
 that is derived directly or indirectly from a gluten-containing grain 
       to identify each such ingredient, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

 Mr. Ryan (for himself and Mr. Stivers) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the label 
  of a drug that is intended for human use and contains an ingredient 
 that is derived directly or indirectly from a gluten-containing grain 
       to identify each such ingredient, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gluten in Medicine Disclosure Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. LABELING OF DRUGS WITH AN INGREDIENT MADE FROM A GLUTEN-
              CONTAINING GRAIN.

    (a) Misbranding.--Section 502 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(gg) If it is a drug--
            ``(1) that is intended for human use;
            ``(2) that contains an ingredient that is derived directly 
        or indirectly from a gluten-containing grain (including wheat, 
        barley, rye, and their crossbred hybrids); and
            ``(3) whose label fails--
                    ``(A) to state that the drug contains such an 
                ingredient; and
                    ``(B) to identify each such ingredient and the type 
                of gluten-containing grain from which it is derived.''.
    (b) Applicability.--Section 502(gg) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act, as added by subsection (a) of this section, shall apply 
beginning on the sooner of--
            (1) a date to be determined by the Secretary of Health and 
        Human Services; and
            (2) the date that is 2 years after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with thequarterly report of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended April 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Gidwitz, theChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, JosephJ. Sum, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350, of Chapter 63 of Title 18 ofthe United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periodspresented in the Report.
| July 14,  2006 |   |                                       |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                       |
|                |   |                                       |
|                | By:    | /s/ James G. Gidwitz                  |
|                |   | James G. Gidwitz                           |
|                |   | Chairman of the Board and                  |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer                    |
|                |   |                                       |
|                |   |                                       |
|                | By:    | /s/ Joseph J. Sum                     |
|                |   | Joseph J. Sum                              |
|                |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY v. SINGER LUMBER COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 9314 Consolidated with No. 9315.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

July 26, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 12, 1978.

Schafer & Schafer, Timothy G. Schafer, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Young, McMahon & Levert, Robert Young, New Orleans, for defendants-appel-lees.

Before GULOTTA, STOULIG and BEER, JJ.

STOULIG, Judge.

Plaintiff, Aetna Insurance Company, has appealed a judgment dismissing its suit against Singer Lumber Company, Inc., doing business as Singer Lumber Mart; and Croft Metal Products, Inc., and its liability insurer, Prestige Casualty Company, in which it claims indemnification for past and future workmen’s compensation benefits it has paid and must pay in the future to one Neuville J. Richard, Jr.

For the reasons assigned in *Neuville J. Richard, Jr.*v. *Singer Lumber Company, Inc., et al.,*rendered this day, La.App., 361 So.2d 955 (1978), which was consolidated for trial and has been appealed as a companion case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Erwin WILLIS and Rebecca Willis.

No. 60865.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Erwin Willis and Rebecca Willis applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus. Parish of Calcasieu.

Writ denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement  
No. 33-54994 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991 and 1992 Stock
Option Plans of Escalon Medical Corp., the Registration Statement No. 33-80162
on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan of Escalon Medical Corp.
and the Registration Statement No. 333-4382 on Form S-3 of Escalon Medical 
Corp. and the related Prospectus of our report dated August 21, 1998, with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Escalon Medical Corp. and 
Subsidiary included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 
30, 1998.




                                         /s/ Parente, Randolph, Orlando, Carey &
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                                 Associates, LLC


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 24, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,252
<INVENTORY>                                     52,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,113
<PP&E>                                          75,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        21,330
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,575
<SALES>                                         53,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,975
<CGS>                                           36,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,992<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,944)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,944)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT IS COMPRISED OF SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES OF
$18,386,000, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSE OF $943,000 AND UNUSUAL
ITEMS OF $16,663,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Raynerd B. Carson, President and Chief Executive Officer of World Ventures Inc., certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual report on Form 20-F for the period ended October 31, 2004 of World Ventures Inc. that:



(1)

The Annual report on Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Annual report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of World Ventures Inc.



/s/ Raynerd B. Carson

Raynerd B. Carson

President (Chief Executive Officer)

April 26, 2005



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO WORLD VENTURES INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY WORLD VENTURES INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SMTEK International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kirk A. Waldron, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

	(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


/s/ Kirk A. Waldron
KIRK A. WALDRON
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
SMTEK International, Inc.

November 7, 2002
Date


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SMTEK International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edward J. Smith, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


/s/ Edward J. Smith
EDWARD J. SMITH
Chief Executive Officer
President
SMTEK International, Inc.

November 7, 2002
Date



20


20