alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[ES-930-07-1310-00-241A; LAES 46792]


Mississippi: Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Lease

    Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease LAES 46792, Wayne County, 
Mississippi, was timely filed and accompanied by all required rentals 
and royalties accruing from June 1, 1996, the date of termination.
    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has 
agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per 
acre and 16\2/3\ percent. Payment of $500 in administrative fees and a 
$125 publication fee has been made.
    The Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate the lease 
effective June 1, 1996, subject to the original terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. This 
is in accordance with section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act 
of 1920, as amended (30 U.S.C. 188 (d) and (e)).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina Goodwin at (703) 440-1534.

    Dated: January 31, 1997.
Marilyn H. Johnson,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 97-3368 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-M
#### Gilbert Paul WEISS, Appellant, v. Shelly B. WEISS, Appellee.

No. 73-1177.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6052** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ALLAH BURMAN, a/k/a A , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. James K. Bredar , District Judge. ( 1:01

- cr - 00115

- JKB

- 5; 1:13

- cv - 02980

- JKB )

Submitted : March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Allah Burman, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Schenning, Lisa M. Turner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bindin g precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Allah Burman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion , and he has filed a motion for release from custody
. Because
Burman’s § 2255 motion was a successive a nd unauthorized § 2255 motion , see 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h); In re Vial , 115 F.3d 1192, 1194 (4th Cir. 1997) , the district court was obligated to dismiss the motion, s ee United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 205 (4th Cir. 2003) , and t he order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) ( 2012 ) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial s howing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) ( 2012 )
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessme nt of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both th at the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S.3 at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burman has not made the requis ite showing. Accordingly, we deny Burman’s motion for release from custody, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appea l. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befor e th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000025757
<NAME> CROMPTON & KNOWLES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                           18238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   207942
<ALLOWANCES>                                     10111
<INVENTORY>                                     323779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                632268
<PP&E>                                          445171
<DEPRECIATION>                                  424524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1396803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           368577
<BONDS>                                         686700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7733
<OTHER-SE>                                       42847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1396803
<SALES>                                         396292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                396292
<CGS>                                           247295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   330975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (40706)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1218
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  92869
<INCOME-TAX>                                     33666
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              59203
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     59203
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Datascope Corp.
(the "Company") for the Quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         o the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         o the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


May 15, 2003
                              /s/ Lawrence Saper
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Lawrence Saper
                              Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



                              /s/ Murray Pitkowsky
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Murray Pitkowsky
                              Senior V.P., Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer