alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
800 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20591

AFS-11-320-P

March 20, 2014

Mr. Craig P. J. Wheel

205 Catalina Drive

Newark, DE 19711

Dear Mr. Wheel:

This is in response to your May 12, 2011, petition to the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA), for revision to § 61.51(f)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

Your petition requested that the FAA revise § 61.51 (f)(2) to allow for a pilot to log 

second in command (SIC) flight time when performing SIC functions as an “assigned 

flight crewmember” in part 91 operations.

When the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 

14 CFR part 11, particularly those guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking 

found in § 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when 

making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition 

for rulemaking: 

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises;

2) the priority of other FAA issues; and

3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

While your petition does not meet the criteria for consideration at this time, we offer the 

following as background on this issue. The FAA has consistently denied exemption 

requests that would allow airmen to log SIC flight time in an aircraft that do not require 

an SIC by either the aircraft type certificate or by an operating rule. The FAA continues 

to support this position in order to maintain the integrity of the higher level airman 

certification and rating requirements. Specifically, airline transport pilot (ATP) 

applicants can credit SIC time toward the pilot in command (PIC) flight time 

requirements found in the applicable sections of part 61, subpart G. The FAA maintains 

the determination that serving as a second pilot in operations conducted under part 91, 

when an SIC is not required by the regulations, would not provide an equivalent quality 

of aeronautical experience that is allowed to be logged under § 61.51(f). 
2

The FAA notes, however, that it is acceptable for the second pilot to log PIC flight time 

for any time that the pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls and is appropriately rated 

in the aircraft; reference § 61.51(e)(1)(i). 

For the reasons stated earlier and in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73, we will take no 

further action on your petition for rulemaking. Accordingly, Docket No. 

FAA-2011-0526 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3024711-SEP-201208:32 AM
DRAFT 

Financial Literacy and Education Commission Public Meeting

AGENDA

March 8, 2022, 3:00 – 4:30 p.m. ET

Via Webcast: www.yorkcast.com/treasury/events/2022/03/08/flec

Welcome and Overview – Department of the Treasury

• Graham Steele, Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions, U.S. Department of the 

Treasury, Designee of Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen, Chair

• Adair Morse, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Capital Access, U.S. Department of the 

Treasury

Vice Chair Remarks

• Rohit Chopra, Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, Vice Chair

Member Remarks

• Michael Hsu, Acting Comptroller of the Currency, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

• Richard Cordray, Chief Operating Officer, Federal Student Aid, U.S. Department of 

Education

Environmental Justice and Energy Justice

• Tony Reames, Senior Advisor on Energy Justice, Office of Economic Impact and Diversity, 

U.S. Department of Energy

Digital Assets Consumer Education 

• Dan Rutherford, Associate Director, Customer Outreach, Office of Customer Education and 

Outreach, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

• Samuel Levine, Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission

Conclusion
Exhibit 32





Certifications





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of American General Finance, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of, Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|      | /s/                                               | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|      |                                                   | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|      | President and Chief Executive Officer             |                         
|      | /s/                                               | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      |                                                   | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |                         
|Date: | August 2, 2005                                    |                          | 





36
Approvals and Promulgations of State Implementation Plans: New Mexico; Regional Haze Rule

Requirements for Mandatory Class I Areas. The docket for EPA’s previous action on New Mexico’s Regional Haze SIP revisions is found at : EPA - R06 - OAR - 2009 - 0050 Links for some key documents from that action can be found below. Proposed Rule (6/15/2012) :  NM031.001 Approvals and Promulgations of State Implementation Plans: New M exico; Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Mandatory Class I Areas. 41 pages s6f Document ID : EPA - R06 - OAR - 2009 - 0050 - 0001 Technical Support Document:

 NM031.002 New Mexico Regional Haze Technical Support Document --- Attachments Document ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2009 - 0050 - 0002 Final Rule (11/27/2012) :  NM031.030 Approvals and Pro mulgations of State Implementation Plans: New Mexico; Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Mandatory Class I Areas. 15 pages syt Document ID : EPA - R06 - OAR - 2009 - 0050 - 0030
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterlyreport of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending April 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Gidwitz, the Chairman of theBoard and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph J. Sum, theVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and Section 1350, of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to ourknowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periodspresented in the Report.

 

 

May 17, 2005

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/    James  G. Gidwitz |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | James G. Gidwitz                             |
|   |   | Chairman of the Board  and                   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer                      |
|   |   |                                         |
|   |   |                                         |
|   | By:    | /s/    Joseph  J. Sum    |   |
|   |   | Joseph J. Sum                                |
|   |   | Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer  |
|        |        |                                              |        |  |

 

----
#### Willard D. DARBY, Appellant, v. Ella Mae DARBY, Appellee.

No. 77-1376.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 22, 1978.

Marie Alice Crano, Lake Wales, for appellant.

Ella Mae Darby, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Willard D. Darby, appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage awarding appellee, Ella Mae Darby, alimony. His sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in fixing an alimony award. We agree and reverse.

Appellee filed a petition for dissolution of the marriage alleging that the marriage was irretrievably broken. She did not request alimony or any relief other than dissolution. Appellant filed a counterpetition for dissolution requesting, among other things, “other and further relief as may be just. . . . ” The parties subsequently entered into a written stipulation providing in pertinent part that the “[hjusband agrees that the marital home of the parties is the separate property of wife and he makes no claim to it or any part of it.” The stipulation did not provide for the payment of alimony.

*899Neither appellant nor his attorney of record was present at the final hearing.

The final judgment provided that:

> The Court has considered the stipulation of the parties and the same is not approved insofar as it is silent as to permanent alimony. This has been a long term marriage and wife is unemployed and without funds while husband’s income is approximately $150.00 per week, and the Court is somewhat troubled by these facts and therefore awards to wife temporary alimony of $36.00 per week, the first payment to be due on July 8, 1977 and on each Friday thereafter continuing through October 28,1977, and the Court further awards wife permanent alimony of $21.00 per week, the first payment to be due November 4, 1977 and subsequent payments to be due on each Friday thereafter until wife remarries or dies.

There is no question that the trial court had the authority to make an award of alimony even though it was not specified in the stipulation. However, such an award should not have been made without first affording appellant the opportunity to an adversary hearing at which evidence would be introduced as to the ability of appellant to pay and the needs of appellee.

Accordingly, the award of alimony is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings on that issue. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and' OTT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.5




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE


ACT OF 1934





I, Kelly McNeill certify that:




1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of IMRIS Inc.;


2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e))  and have:





a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Intentionally omitted pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)





c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures; as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: February 28, 2011Kelly McNeillChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32858]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service
[T.D. 97-99]


Customs Approval of V.I.P Cargo Surveys Incorporated as a 
Commercial Gauger and Accredited Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of approval and accreditation of V.I.P Cargo Survey, 
Inc. as a commercial gauger and accredited laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: V.I.P Cargo Surveys, Inc. of Aransas Pass, Texas, has applied 
to U.S. Customs to extend its approval to gauge petroleum and petroleum 
products and accreditation to perform petroleum analysis methods under 
Part 151.13 of the Customs Regulations (19 CAR 151.13) to their Texas 
City, Texas facility. Customs has determined that this office meets all 
of the requirements for approval as a commercial gauger. Additionally, 
Customs has determined that this facility meets all requirements for 
accreditation as a Commercial Laboratory to perform (1) API Gravity, 
(2) Water by Distillation, (3) Sediment by Extraction, (4) Saybolt 
Universal Viscosity, (5) Sediment and Water and (6) Distillation. 
Therefore, in accordance with Part 151.13(f) of the Customs 
Regulations, V.I.P Cargo Surveys, Inc., Texas City, Texas, is approved 
to gauge the products named above and to perform the analysis methods 
listed above in all Customs ports.

LOCATION: V.I.P Cargo Surveys Inc. approved and accredited site is 
located at: 1442 Texas Avenue, Texas City, Texas 77590.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ira S. Reese, Senior Science Officer, 
Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 5.5-B, Washington, D.C. 20229 at (202) 
927-1060.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
George D. Heavey,
Director, Laboratories and Scientific Service.
[FR Doc. 97-32858 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2210 

To ensure that a fair percentage of Federal cancer research funds are 

dedicated to pediatric cancer research. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2021 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Ms. STEFANIK, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Ms. 

HERRERA BEUTLER, and Mr. EVANS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To ensure that a fair percentage of Federal cancer research 

funds are dedicated to pediatric cancer research. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness to Kids with 

5 Cancer Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2210 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERCENTAGE OF FEDERAL CANCER RESEARCH 

2 FUNDS REQUIRED TO BE USED FOR PEDI3 ATRIC CANCER RESEARCH. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—For fiscal year 2022 and each 

5 subsequent fiscal year, the President shall ensure that, of 

6 the total amount of Federal funds obligated for cancer re7 search, the percentage obligated for pediatric cancer re8 search is equal to the percentage described in subsection 

9 (b). 

10 (b) PERCENTAGE.—The percentage described in this 

11 subsection is the percentage constituted by the ratio of 

12 the number of individuals who are under the age of 18 

13 residing in the United States at the end of the fiscal year 

14 preceding the fiscal year to which subsection (a) is being 

15 applied, to the total number of individuals residing in the 

16 United States at such time, as determined by the Bureau 

17 of the Census. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0524

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM042AD

84-26-15 --- 6/7/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th & Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 97-063. Applicant: University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801. Instrument: (2) Gas Composition Analyzers, 
Model Epison III. Manufacturer: Thomas Swan & Co., Ltd., United 
Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 62 FR 42237, August 6, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, was being manufactured in the 
United States at the time the foreign instrument was ordered (April 2, 
1997). Reasons: The foreign instrument provides non-invasive testing of 
thin film surfaces in feedback control mode.
    The National Science Foundation, Center for Interfacial Engineering 
advised on October 4, 1996 that (1) this capability is pertinent to the 
applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument 
or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument 
for the applicant's intended use (comparable case).
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which was being manufactured 
in the United States at the time of order.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-32463 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66385-66386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Glen Canyon Technical Work Group

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, DOI.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glen Canyon Technical Work Group (TWG) was formed as an 
official subcommittee of the Glen Canyon Adaptive Management Work Group 
(AMWG) on September 10, 1997. The TWG members were named by the members 
of the AMWG and will provide advice and information to the AMWG. The 
AMWG will use this information to form recommendations to the Secretary 
of the Interior for guidance of the Grand Canyon Monitoring and 
Research Center science program and other direction as requested by the 
Secretary. All meetings are open to the public; however, seating is 
limited and is available on a first come, first served basis. The 
agenda for the meeting will discuss beach/habitat building flow 
monitoring and research and program cost estimates.

DATE AND LOCATION: The TWG public meeting will be held at the following 
time and location:
    Phoenix, Arizona--January 14, 1997. The meeting will begin at 12:00 
p.m. and conclude at 5:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the LaQuinta 
Inn, 2510 W. Greenway Road, Phoenix, Arizona.
    Time will be allowed on the agenda for any organization or 
individual wishing to make formal oral comments (limited to 10 minutes) 
at the meeting, but written notice must be provided to Mr. Bruce Moore, 
Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Regional Office, 125 South State 
Street, Room 6107, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138-1102, telephone (801) 
524-3702, faxogram (801) 524-5499, E-mail at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0929d9f9f8295b08593de85839282de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dab8b7b5b5a8bf9aafb9f4afa9b8a8f4bdb5ac">[email protected]</span></a> at 
least FIVE (5) days prior to the meeting. Any written comments received 
will be provided to the TWG members at the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

[[Page 66386]]

Bruce Moore, telephone (801) 524-3702, faxorgram (801) 524-5499, E-mail 
at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b09060404190e2b1e08451e180919450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0466696b6b76614471672a717766762a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 12, 1997.
R. Steve Richardson,
Acting Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 97-33010 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>