alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           160,437
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      16,992
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 265,594
<CASH>                                          34,195
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 153
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          29,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,428,694
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  3,762
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   1,195
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          248,016
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,200
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,428,694
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             19,400
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (3,100)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  17,307
<BENEFITS>                                         632
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      4,845
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             4,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,839
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,589
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0




</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 22

- 395

_____________________________ A.M.S

- B., Mother o f R.S

- B., M.S

B., Jr ., Minor Children , Appellant,

v.
D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appellee.

_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennifer J. Frydrychowicz , Judge

. September 9, 2022

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. O STERHAUS , B ILBREY , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________2 A.M.S

- B., Mother of R.S

- B., M.S

- B., Jr., Minor Children, pro se , Appellant.
Sarah J. Rumph, Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee; Sara Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee , for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7470

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JULIO CESAR PEREZ, a/k/a Jose Luis Villarreal,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-96-305, CA-98-1494-3-17)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lionel Aron Pena, Sr., Edinburg, Texas, for Appellant. Beth Drake,

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Julio Cesar Perez seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Perez, Nos. CR-96-305;

CA-98-1494-3-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            4404
<SECURITIES>                                     63600
<RECEIVABLES>                                    48380
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1317)
<INVENTORY>                                      40933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                162095
<PP&E>                                           80191
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (35307)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  226096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            36047
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                      179300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    226096
<SALES>                                          98200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 98200
<CGS>                                            33720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    33720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22455
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6642
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              15813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     15813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
        

</TABLE>
Quarterly Report on International Monetary Fund Lending

January 1 – March 31, 2017

Board 

Approval 

Date

Country Amount Type U.S. Position Background

1/13 Republic of 

Poland

SDR13 Billion

(previously SDR 15.5 

billion)

Arrangement Under the 

Flexible Credit Line and 

Cancellation of the Current 

Arrangement

Support http://www.imf.org/en/N

ews/Articles/2017/01/13

/PR1711-Poland-IMFExecutive-BoardApproves-New-TwoYear-Billion-FlexibleCredit-LineArrangement

1/23 Niger SDR 98.7 million Extended Credit Facility Support http://www.imf.org/en/N

ews/Articles/2017/01/24

/PR1718-Niger-IMFExecutive-BoardApproves-US-134-04-

Million-under-ECFArrangement
#### TOWN OF LAKE CLARKE SHORES, Florida, a municipal corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Howard GREENFIELD and Marian Greenfield, Appellees.

No. 73-1244.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 1998, and the consolidated statement
of income for the year ended August 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000861880
<NAME>                        ILM II SENIOR LIVING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      496
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,392
<PP&E>                                          37,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              220
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,383
<SALES>                                          4,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,907
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,907
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        


</TABLE>
#### W. Charles BECKER, Appellant, v. Joseph KODEL, Appellee.

No. 77-54.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1978.

*853A. John Goshgarian and Howard J. Hoch-man, Miami, for appellant.

Reginald M. Hayden, Jr. and Ira M. Wit-lin and Myra F. Bennett, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Third Party Plaintiff, seeks review of a final summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee, Third Party Defendant. Appellant’s Third Party claim against appellee arises out of a financial transaction between the parties.

The burden of proving the absence of a genuine issue of material fact was upon the appellee, movant. The record does not support a finding that he has successfully met his burden. Absent such showing, appellant was under no obligation to show that issues remain. *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). Therefore the judgment appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

s0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148941

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148941

COA: 319691

Macomb CC: 2012-004269-FC

ALONTEZ DEREECE WILLIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7792

BARRY ALLEN BOYD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-00-882-7)

Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Allen Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Barry Allen Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Baskerville, No. CA-00-882-7

(W.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2000). We deny Boyd’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc.  (the“Company”) for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Edward R.Cameron, as Chief Executive Officer and Peter P. Hausback, as Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | March 18, 2010                                   |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                  |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
| By:    | /s/ Edward R. Cameron                                 |   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer                |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
| By:    | /s/ Peter P. Hausback                                 |   |
|   | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### JONES v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA.

No. 38163.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 889.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6583** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DONALD TERRELL WASHINGTON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg
. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 00022

- GMG

- 1 )

Submitted : August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THA CKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Donald Terrell Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donald Terrell Washington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Washington , No. 3:06

- cr - 00022

- GM G

- 1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 7, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befo re this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Elaine AUGUST, Appellant, v. Fred AUGUST, Appellee.

No. 77-732.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 20, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 1977.

*795Shevin, Shapo & Shevin and David A. Freedman, Miami, for appellant.

Fine, Jacobson, Black, Goldberg & Semet and Mitchell R. Bloomberg, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

HUBBART, Judge.

By this interlocutory appeal, we are asked to review a trial court order dismissing one count of a post-judgment petition to set aside a final judgment of divorce. In such count, the appellant-wife (Elaine August) alleged that the final judgment should be set aside because of certain misconduct committed by the appellee-husband (Fred August) which led to a property settlement agreement later incorporated into the final judgment. The alleged misconduct consisted of undue influence, duress, and fraudulent concealment of assets. We affirm.

The law is clear that a post-judgment petition to set aside a final judgment on the grounds of fraud (intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party must be brought not more than one year after the final judgment is entered. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b). Since the instant petition was brought approximately eighteen months after the entry of the divorce judgment, the petition was untimely and the trial court properly dismissed it. See *Wilder v. Wilder,*251 So.2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

*Scales v. Scales,*237 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), does not compel a contrary result. In that case, this court held that the proper venue for an action to modify a divorce judgment was in the court which originally entered the judgment. In obiter dicta, the court quite properly rejected a contention made by one of the parties that an attack on the divorce decree was forever precluded because one year had elapsed from the date of the entry of the decree. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b) specifically provides that an independent action may be filed at any time to relieve a party from a judgment for fraud upon the court. No such independent action has been filed in this case, and, in any event, the alleged fraud herein does not constitute a fraud upon the court. *Alexander v. First National Bank of Titusville,*275 So.2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

For the above reasons, the order appealed from is in all respects affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### George W. ADAMS, Appellant, v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION, an agency of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-37.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 17, 1974.

Michael C. Bergen, Bergen & Roberts, Lake City, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the conduct complained of by appellant was properly held to be a discretionary function by the trial court, the waiver of sovereign immunity provided *264for by Section 768.15, Florida Statutes, F. S.A., does not obtain inasmuch as appellee was at the time of the conduct complained of performing a discretionary function which is made an exception to the said statutory waiver of immunity. Accordingly, the judgment dismissing the complaint for damages, which is the subject matter of review herein, is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,263,967
<SECURITIES>                                   330,016
<RECEIVABLES>                                  944,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,519
<INVENTORY>                                    462,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,150,491
<PP&E>                                         224,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,734,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          685,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    747,321
<COMMON>                                    45,253,597
<OTHER-SE>                                (39,952,266)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,734,128
<SALES>                                      5,942,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,942,004
<CGS>                                        2,588,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,588,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,300,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                171,472
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            171,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   171,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles L. GARNER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Florida Division of Corrections, etc., Respondent.

No. 43410.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 826.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.