alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32444]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Open Meeting, Technical Mapping Advisory Council

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 App. 1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency gives 
notice that the following meeting will be held:

NAME: Technical Mapping Advisory Council.

DATES OF MEETING: December 11 and 12, 1997.

PLACES: The meeting will be held at the Thunderbird Motel, 2201 E. 78th 
St., Bloomington, MN.

TIMES: 8 a.m. to 6. p.m. on Thursday and 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Friday.

PPROPOSED AGENDA: Discussion of 1997 Annual Report.

STATUS: This meeting is open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael K. Buckley, P.E., Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 
Street SW., room 421, Washington, DC 20472; telephone (202) 646-2756 or 
by fax (202) 646-4596.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Publication of this notice does not give a 
15 day advance notice of the meeting as required by General Services 
Administration regulations. This shorter notice period resulted from 
reassignment of Agency staff.

    Dated: December 8, 1997.
Michael J. Armstrong,
Associate Director for Mitigation.
[FR Doc. 97-32444 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-04-M
```
----

----

FedFirst Financial Corporation 10-K

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: March 18, 2011 |                                                                                       |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | /s/ Patrick G. O’Brien                                                               |
|                            | Patrick G. O’BrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
|                            |                                                                                       |
|                            |                                                                                       |
|                            |                                                                                       |
|                            | /s/ Robert C. Barry, Jr.                                                                   |
|                            | Robert C. Barry, Jr.Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer                    |
#### Jack PINES and Shirlee Pines, his wife, Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF CYPRESS GARDENS, N. A., et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 9, 1977.

*802Thomas F. Icard, Jr. of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellants.

Roy C. Summerlin of Summerlin, Connor & Casey, Winter Haven, for Barnett Bank of Cypress Gardens.

Clinton A. Curtis of Peterson, Myers, Curtis, Craig & Crews, Lake Wales, for Irbys and Life Ins. Co. of Georgia.

PER CURIAM.

This case involved complicated factual and legal issues and at first gave us considerable pause. However, upon a careful review of the record and briefs, we have concluded that the appellants failed to show any reversible error on the part of the trial judge.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court should be and is hereby affirmed.

McNULTY, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                       224
<INVENTORY>                                     22,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,515
<PP&E>                                          30,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,335
<BONDS>                                         14,644
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,456
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,511
<SALES>                                         74,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,334
<CGS>                                           44,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (228)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (589)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)


</TABLE>
.<^LAa1€uJJ.^A^J

cCogV »V\ C^iXir^t^

'£> ttt^-r- no- /frTT^T

Xjum&JU

Ct &\ (6sJuO&&i f3

t

2^^

r (jaaoIX /lo&h^J . oJc

UjElX^^

l?.0.fc, Uv jCcui^^-

M. _d6ii^£CivrX U/\j C^vIa^ 'tVkM^

ImJ^SZ^^^ G^h&CXfl^cfi

-REIVED ^s£

iOUHT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JAN 05 21)15

Abei Acosta, Clerk 3JZHSSH-
The following outline covers new requirements that are under consideration for 

new and revised SAE J Standards. 

DRAFT June 9, 2009 

Recommendations for the routing and circuit connections in the engine 

compartment of the vehicle

09 Jun. 09 1 

The SAE International Interior Climate Control Standards Committee is currently revising existing 

J Standards and developing new J Standards for Mobile Air Conditioning Systems. 

R1234yf refrigerant

1. Refrigerant Fittings shall be located such that in the case of failure, they will not directly 

spray refrigerant and oil on hot [temperatures exceeding 750oC] surfaces in the engine 

compartment area (underhood). . All systems components shall be designed to prevent 

direct impingement of leaking refrigerant and oil on surfaces hot enough to cause ignition 

of either the refrigerant or oil. 

2. R1234yf refrigeration circuit connections ( both single and multiple Evaporator systems) 

shall be located outside the vehicle passenger compartment and outside the cabin MAC 

system air distribution system paths 

or 

designed such that design-intent leak refrigerant circuit components tightness is ensured 

if inside the passenger cabin or air distribution flow path 

3. If the refrigerant circuit has a pressure relief device, it shall be located such that 

refrigerant and oil does not spray directly on hot [temperatures exceeding 750oC] 

surfaces in the engine compartment area 

4. If hoses and hose couplings are located near hot surfaces in the engine compartment 

area (underhood), shields shall be placed on the hot surfaces to assure that surface 

temperature of the shield shall not exceed 750oC under all vehicle operating conditions. 

It is recommended that the heat shield be placed on the lines. 

5. The refrigerant circuit components must be routed in such a way that every part of the 

system is protected by the body structure from objects lying on the ground or from direct 

contact with the ground itself. The pipe and hoses should be carefully designed to avoid 

any contact or friction to other parts of the vehicle. The circuit components should have 

sufficient clearance (and/or restraint) to stationary and moving parts in the underhood 

compartment to avoid uncontrolled components leakage. 

6. MAC system Service fittings shall be located for ease of attachment of service hoses and 

shall not be pointed such that any failures may result in direct impingement of refrigerant 

on the service technician. Piping shall be of robust design to avoid damage or permanent 

deformation while connecting / disconnecting the service hose coupling(s) from factory 

charging and service equipment.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

D.J.F., the father

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
, and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM

,

Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 1120

[ June 21, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; James Martz , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016

- DP

- 000799

- JO

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel,

West Palm Bea ch, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Children & Families.

Laura J. Lee, Sanford, for appellee Guardian Ad Litem Program

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, L EVINE and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 23.2

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a
security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement.

On
June 25, 2002, the trust announced the termination of its engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent auditors upon the trustee's appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as
the trust's independent auditors for fiscal 2002. For more information, see the trust's current report on Form 8-K dated June 25, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 28, 2002.

After
reasonable efforts, the trust has been unable to obtain the consent of Arthur Andersen, the trust's former independent auditors, as to the incorporation by reference of their
report for the year ended December 31, 2001 into XTO Energy Inc.'s previously filed registration statement (No. 333-81849) under the Securities Act, and the trust has
not filed that consent with this Annual Report on Form 10-K in reliance on Rule 437a of the Securities Act of 1933. Because the trust has not been able to obtain Arthur
Andersen's consent, you will not be able to recover against Arthur Andersen under Section 11 of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the trust's
financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions to state a material fact required to be stated therein.

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated February 20, 2006,accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Cryo-Cell International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said report in the Registration Statements of the Company on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-92991, effective December 17, 1999 and File No. 333-65418, effective July 19, 2001). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Tampa, FL

February 20, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2320 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2320

To provide for the continuation of paid parental leave for a member of 
        the Armed Forces in the event of the death of the child.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2021

Mr. Jackson (for himself and Mr. Golden) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the continuation of paid parental leave for a member of 
        the Armed Forces in the event of the death of the child.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Elaine M. Checketts Military 
Families Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE FOR A MEMBER OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES UPON DEATH OF CHILD.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall amend the regulations prescribed 
pursuant to subsections (i) and (j) of section 701 of title 10, United 
States Code, to ensure that paid parental leave that has already been 
approved for a member of the Armed Forces who is a primary or secondary 
caregiver (as defined under such regulations) may not be terminated 
upon the death of the child for whom such leave is taken.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cotton States Life Insurance Company
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, J. Ridley Howard, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ J. Ridley HowardDate: November 11, 2004
    
    J. Ridley HowardPresident and Chief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133706 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133706 

 COA: 266081

 Wayne CC: 05-004588-01 

EDWARD LEE ROWLAND, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
#### Harvey Bruce ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-268.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 9, 1973.

Harvey B. Roberts, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### Clarence WHITFIELD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-296.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 13, 1970.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K. Acting C. J., WIGGINTON, J. and McLANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65813-65814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part F, of the Statement of Organization, Functions and Delegations 
of Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services, Health 
Care Financing Administration (HCFA), (49 Federal Register 34247, dated 
September 6, 1984) is amended to include the following delegation of 
authority from the Secretary to the Administrator for Title XXI of the 
Social Security Act.
    The specific amendments to Part F are described below:
    I. Section F.30., Delegations of Authority is amended by adding the 
following paragraph: SS. The authority vested in the Secretary under 
Title XXI of the Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397aa et seq.).
    Limitation: No State plan or amendment shall be finally disapproved 
without consultation and discussion by the Administrator with the 
Secretary.
    II. Section F.30., Delegations of Authority, paragraph RR is 
revised to include title XXI, the revised paragraph reads as follows:

[[Page 65814]]

    RR. The authority vested in the Secretary or that may become vested 
in the Secretary, and not otherwise delegated, limited, or reserved, to 
conduct studies and demonstration projects, as directed by Congress, 
that relate to the programs established by Title XI of the Social 
Security Act (Act), insofar as they relate to the mission of the Health 
Care Financing Administration (HCFA), and Titles XVIII, XIX, and XXI. 
This delegation encompasses the authority to approve related program 
activities required by the studies and demonstration projects if such 
authority is or becomes vested in the Secretary and is not otherwise 
delegated, limited, or reserved. These activities include, but are not 
limited to, direct performance, entering into contracts or cooperative 
agreements, making grants, approving payments for contracts, 
cooperative agreements, and grants and approving authorized waivers of 
compliance with certain requirements of titles XI, XVIII, and XIX and 
XXI of the Act when such actions are for the purpose of conducting 
studies and demonstration projects.
    This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's existing 
delegation of authority and policy on regulations. In addition, I 
hereby ratify and affirm any actions taken by the Administrator or 
other HCFA officials which, in effect, involved the exercise of this 
authority prior to the effective date of this delegation. This 
delegation is effective immediately.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
Donna E. Shalala,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32747 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2609 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2609

     To amend title 10, United States Code, to make permanent the 
  requirement for an annual report on the material readiness of Navy 
                     ships, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2021

 Mr. Wittman (for himself and Mr. Garamendi) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 10, United States Code, to make permanent the 
  requirement for an annual report on the material readiness of Navy 
                     ships, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANNUAL REPORT ON MATERIAL READINESS OF NAVY SHIPS.

    Section 8674(d) of title 10, United States Code is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``submit to the'' inserting 
                ``provide to the'';
                    (B) by inserting ``a briefing and submit to such 
                committees'' after ``congressional defense 
                committees''; and
                    (C) by striking ``setting forth'' and inserting 
                ``regarding'';
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``in an unclassified form that is 
                releasable to the public without further redaction.'' 
                and inserting ``in--''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraphs:
            ``(A) a classified form that shall be available only to the 
        congressional defense committees; and
            ``(B) an unclassified form that is releasable to the public 
        without further redaction''; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (3).
                                 <all>
```