Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 16, 1997 / Notices 65809

and adjoining property are no longer

used by Duke as a lake maintenance

facility. Duke requests that we reclassify

the shoreline to ‘‘Future Commercial/

Residential’’.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C1,

D2.

B. Comments, Protests, or Motions to

Intervene—Anyone may submit

comments, a protest, or a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

requirements of Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214.

In determining the appropriate action to

take, the Commission will consider all

protests or other comments filed, but

only those who file a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any comments,

protests, or motions to intervene must

be received on or before the specified

comment date for the particular

application.

C1. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—Any filings must bear in

all capital letters the title

‘‘COMMENTS’’,

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS

AND CONDITIONS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, or

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’, as

applicable, and the Project Number of

the particular application to which the

filing refers. Any of the above-named

documents must be filed by providing

the original and the number of copies

provided by the Commission’s

regulations to: The Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

A copy of any motion to intervene must

also be served upon each representative

of the Applicant specified in the

particular application.

D2. Agency Comments—Federal,

state, and local agencies are invited to

file comments on the described

application. A copy of the application

may be obtained by agencies directly

from the Applicant. If an agency does

not file comments within the time

specified for filing comments, it will be

presumed to have no comments. One

copy of an agency’s comments must also

be sent to the Applicant’s

representatives.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–32714 Filed 12–15–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Project No. 2188–030]

Montana Power Company; Notice of

Intent To Hold Technical Modeling

Workshop at Oak Ridge National

Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee to

Discuss the Modeling of Thermal

Impacts Associated With the Madison

Development Part of the MissouriMadison Hydroelectric Project

Proposed for Relicensing

December 10, 1997.

On January 22 and 23, 1998, a

technical modeling workshop at Oak

Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in

Oak Ridge, Tennessee will be conducted

to discuss the modeling of thermal

impacts associated with the Madison

Development. The model was used to

evaluate alternatives considered in Draft

Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)

considering issuance of a new license

for the Missouri Madison Project. The

Notice of Availability of the DEIS

appeared in the Federal Register on

October 3, 1997 (62 FR 51855).

The workshop is scheduled as

follows:

8:30 am–4:30 pm, January 22, Bldg.

1503, ORNL

8:30 am–12:00 pm, January 23, Bldg.

1503, ORNL

Workshop attendees should contact:

Mark Bevelhimer ((423) 576–0266 or

mbs@ornl.gov) to confirm attendance

and obtain lodging options and local

directions to the workshop.

Anyone wishing to submit questions

or comments regarding the model of

thermal impacts to discuss at the

workshop should address them to: Lois

D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

Written correspondence should

clearly show the following caption on

the first page: Missouri-Madison

Hydroelectric Project No. 2188–030.

For further information, please

contact Mr. R. Feller at (202) 219–2796.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–32713 Filed 12–15–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–5935–5]

Office of Research and Development;

Met One Instruments, Inc.: Application

for Equivalent Method; Determination

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of application.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) is announcing that Met

One Instruments, Inc. has submitted an

application for equivalent method

determinations on their PM10 Beta

Attenuation Ambient Particle Monitors,

Models BAM 1020 and GBAM 1020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frank F. McElroy, Human Exposure and

Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–

46), National Exposure Research

Laboratory, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Research Triangle

Park, North Carolina 27711, (919) 541–

2622.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notification is given that an application

has been received to determine if a new

PM10 monitoring method should be

designated by the Administrator of the

EPA as an equivalent method under 40

CFR part 53. The application was

received on September 12, 1997 from

Met One Instruments, Inc., 1600

Washington Blvd., Grants Pass, Oregon

97526 proposing that their PM10 Beta

Attenuation Ambient Particle Monitors,

Models BAM 1020, BAM 1020–1,

GBAM 1020, and GBAM 1020–1 be

designated as an equivalent method. If,

after appropriate technical study, the

Administrator determines that this

method should be so designated, a

document thereof will be published in

a subsequent issue of the Federal

Register.

Henry L. Longest II,

Acting Assistant Administrator for Research

and Development.

[FR Doc. 97–32787 Filed 12–15–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of

Proposed New Routine Uses

AGENCY: Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

ACTION: Amendment of system of

records to include new routine uses.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(11), the