alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-33374, 333-126236, 333-163804) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-166604) of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. of our report’s dated March 17, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and Subsidiaries, which appear on pages 4 and 28, respectively, of this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended January 2, 2010.

 
| /s/   BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE, LLP |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| Minneapolis,   Minnesota              |   |
| January 28,   2011               |   |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50542 Conference Calendar

LISTON RANDOLPH POSEY, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WALTER S. SMITH, Judge; UNNAMED U.S. ATTORNEY, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CV-135-JN

-------------------- February 18, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Liston Randolph Posey, II, federal prisoner # 02528-095, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Posey argues that John Phinizy, the Assistant United States Attorney named as a defendant, acted without jurisdiction and in violation of Posey’s due process rights by filing a motion to dispose of Posey’s property seized when he was arrested. Posey argues that Judge Smith acted in theNo. 99-50542 -2- complete absence of jurisdiction in granting the Government’s motion to dispose of his property and awarding it to the Limestone County, Texas, Sheriff’s Department. Because Phinizy moved to dispose of Posey’s property pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3665 and the district court acted pursuant to § 3665, Phinizy and Judge Smith are entitled to immunity for their actions taken in their official capacity. See Boyd v. Biggers , 31 F.3ed 279, 285 (5th Cir. 1994)(prosecutorial immunity); Graves v. Hampton , 1 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993)(judicial immunity). Judge Smith did not act in the complete absence of authority. Mireles v.

Waco , 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991). Further, Judge Smith is not deprived of immunity even if the action is ultimately found to be in error. Id. at 12-13. Posey has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his Bivens action for monetary damages against Judge Smith and Phinizy as frivolous pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Posey’s appeal is without arguable merit and it thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, Posey’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Posey is advised that the district court’s dismissal of his Bivens action as frivolous counts as a “strike” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) after this court dismisses this appeal and that the dismissal of this appeal also counts as a “strike” pursuant to § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Posey is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates a third “strike,” he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil actionNo. 99-50542 -3- or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). The motion to supplement is GRANTED.
APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        793
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      1,710
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 1,051
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      8,846
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        8,825
<LOANS>                                   139,419
<ALLOWANCE>                                 1,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            153,682
<DEPOSITS>                                111,586
<SHORT-TERM>                                8,111
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         3,870
<LONG-TERM>                                14,476
<COMMON>                                        9
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 15,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            153,682
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            11,016
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             198
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               94
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           11,308
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          5,106
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          5,914
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       5,394
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 (25)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             3,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,370
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  3,370
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,142
<EPS-BASIC>                                2.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                2.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               3.87
<LOANS-NON>                                   140
<LOANS-PAST>                                  256
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               72
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            1,473
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 186
<RECOVERIES>                                    6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           1,269
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        1,251
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        18


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONI, E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of CrownCrafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending July 2, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 16, 2006         /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board,   President and Chief Executive Officer   436552
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

# RECEIVED OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## JUL - 82013

WASIDNGTON,D.C. 

## HEARIN

# --------------------~ GDOCKET IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKETNO. FAA-2012-0910 CLELIA AYALA FAA CASE NO. 2010S0290061 Respondent Judge J.E. Sullivan

COMPLAINANT'S (ADMINISTRATOR'S) MOTION TO STRIKE TO RESPONDENT'S 'RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION OF COMPLAINANT' AS UNTIMELY
Pursuant to Judge Sullivan's June 12, 2013, Order Setting Motion Deadlines Regarding Respondent's Motion for Non-Disclosure and Granting/Denying Other Relief, the Complainant hereby files this motionbased on the reasons set forth below: 1. On June 11, 2013, the Respondent orally moved to seal the record in the abovereferenced case based on the following grounds: (1) her address is online for people to see; (2) her friends can see the record online; and (3) the publication ofthe record may impacther ability to secure ajob. 2. On June 12, 2013, Judge Sullivan issued the above-referenced Order, which established a June 21, 2013, deadline for the Complainant to file a reply (to the Complainant'sresponse to the Respondent's oral motionto seal the record). 3. On June 13, 2013, the Complainant timely filed his written response to the Complainant's oral motion. 4. However, the Respondent failed to submit a reply by the June 21, 2013, deadline; rather, the Respondent submittedher reply on June 28, 2013.5. As the Respondent has filed an untimely reply, the Complainant motions this Court to strike the Respondent's reply. 

# -r /j Respectfullyfsubmitted this

# L day of 

## /j

## ~(/) / ,2013. ! ,i 'i )/ 

# I i
__./ .'// I ;/ 1**~**

# ./v**'"~** WilliamVines Counsel for Complainant Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7 FAA P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, Georgia 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Settlement was sent by certified mail, facsimile, and/or email as follows:
The Honorable J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 CleliaAyala 11175 Georgia Avenue Apt. 603 Wheaton, MD 20902 Email: ayalaclelia@gmail.com ; ,", (by certified**----~-_j** (by facsimile _l'.<: c;_!,

i' ''-'--'--'-c_l

,_)c.:[

__ (email only
_______ _}

':! ij i ·>(i"::·:· Federal Aviation Administration (by certified mail only
_____ c_! 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000

c. 

### ' i\ (\ 

## WuviJYll\)

## ~ 

## 1 Donna Stanley 

# (J Legal Assistant Office ofthe Regional Counsel

Dated

3
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002



In
connection with the Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report of Yangtze River Development Limited (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”), Xiangyao Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Annual Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The
    information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
    of operations of the Company.



|By: | /s/
    Xiangyao Liu                | 
|--- | ----------------------------------- | 
|    | Xiangyao
    Liu                    | 
|    | Principal
        Executive Officer



Dated:
April 28, 2017
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1734
WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:06-cv-02177-DCN) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Francis Blanchard, III, Alice F. Paylor, ROSEN, ROSEN & HAGOOD, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wesley Edward Smith, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Charleston County School District , No. 2:06-cv-02177-DCN (D.S.C. May 8, 2008). We deny Smith’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as moot, as in forma pauperis status has already been granted. We also deny Smith’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
The Community Financial Center of 

Prince George’s Community College

March 11, 2010

Betty Habershon, Director Betty Habershon, Director

February 4, 2016

Asset Building 

at Prince George’s Community College
The economic situation that we have 

experienced has highlighted the necessity of 

empowering all members of our communities 

with financial education, financial strategies 

to encourage appropriate financial decision 

making and supporting the development of 

economic resources within communities.
 Poverty in Prince George’s County 

• Over 68,000 residents live below the poverty 

level

• Over 24,000 children live in poverty 

• More than 39% of families are headed by 

single women

 

(US 2010 Census)

The Community Financial Center of Prince 

George's Community College
 Prince George’s Community College 

• Enrolls over 14, 000 credit students

• Enrolls over 26,000 non-credit students

• 44% of students are over 25 years of age

• 49% of students receive financial aid

• Significant number of our students are parents 

with children

The Community Financial Center of Prince 

George's Community College
The mission of the Community Financial 

Center of Prince George’s Community College 

is to support and encourage financial literacy 

and asset building for students and residents 

of Prince George’s County. (Developed in 2009)
The Community Financial Center of Prince 

George’s Community College addresses this 

need through:

– Financial Literacy Program

– Financial Coaching

– Small Business Coaching (spring 2016)

– Free Tax Preparation (VITA Program)
The Community Financial Center of Prince 

George’s Community College provides 

services through

– Student volunteers and interns

– Community volunteers

– Financial professionals 

– Volunteers of financial institutions and related 

non-profit organizations
Prince George’s CASH Campaign

 In 2013, the Community Financial Center 

launched Prince George’s CASH Campaign 

(Creating Assets, Savings and Hope), a 

coalition of asset building organizations, 

developed to increase wealth building 

opportunities for low and moderate income 

residents in Prince George’s County
• FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT CENTER opened in Fall 

2015 as a one-stop shop providing financial services 

to the Prince George’s County residents.

• Located on the Prince George’s Community College Campus 

• In partnership with United Way of National Capital Area.

• Provides expanded year-round tax preparation, financial coaching, 

financial education, small business support and benefit connection.
Contact:

Betty Habershon, Director

The Community Financial Center of

Prince George’s Community College

301-546-0713

bhab@pgcc.edu
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATE
OF CROFF ENTERPRISES, INC.


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350


OF
CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE





I, Gregory R. Woodhill, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Croff Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 that, to my
knowledge:





(1)      the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: October 29,
      2008
              /s/
      GREGORY R. WOODHILLGregory R. Woodhill,
      President andChief Financial
      Officer
FINANCIAL WELLNESS 

AND EDUCATION 

Bryan Ashton

The Ohio State University 
Emotional 

Career 

Social 

Spiritual 

Physical 

Financial 

Intellectual 

Creative 

Environmental 

STUDENT 

WELLNESS 

CENTER
3

STRUCTURE 

OF OUR 

RESPONSE
4

- Develop financial capability

- Address financial stress

- Anticipate and offer just-in-time education

- Support students in financial crisis

Comprehensive Support
5

1:1 Financial Coaching Appointments 

• Proactive 

• Reactive 

• Help Seeking

Group Workshops

• Classes, Student Organizations, Residence Halls, 

Student Athletes etc.

Online Interventions 

• Knowledge Modules

• ITunes U

• Course Interventions
Our Growth

2012-2013

225 1:1 Coaching Appointments

89 Group Presentations

2013-2014

986 1:1 Coaching Appointments

113 Group Presentations

2014-2015

1200 1:1 Coaching Appointments

Over 90 Group Presentations

Fall 2015

740 1:1 Coaching Appointments

60+ Group Presentations
Outcomes:

• Participants were more likely to have a plan to pay back debt than their 

peers who had not yet completed the intervention (p<.05)

• A mandatory one-on-one coaching session contributes to a significant 

decrease in financial stress for participants (p<.05)

• Overall themes (preliminary): 

Increase in efficacy (significant),

Increase in awareness

Increase in knowledge 

Small increase in behavior change 

• More work is needed to establish metrics and effectiveness 

 
• Over 32 Partner Offices

• Financial Aid

• Bursar’s / Service Center 

• Academic Advisors

• Faculty 

• Student Affairs 

• Our Office = Convener 

• Different Offices Bring 

Different Strengths 

Campus Based Approach
National Student Financial Wellness Study:

• 52 participating institutions 

• Sample of just under 19,000 college students

• Key findings: 

• High levels of student financial stress

• Financial concerns are trickling into academic progress

• Financial education levels (both knowledge and exposure) are very 

low

• Finances are interconnected to other areas of students lives

• Will be administered in Spring 2017 

• Results available: http://cssl.osu.edu/national-student-financialwellness-study/results/
National Summit on Collegiate Financial Wellness

• Exists to unite individuals on college campuses that are facilitating this 

work

• 2014 = 200 people, from 120 institutions and 39 states

• Has showcased great momentum in the financial education space on 

college campuses 

• Brings together practitioners, researchers and policy makers

• Will be held June 15th – 17th at The Ohio State University
11

Bryan Ashton

ashton.53@osu.edu

614-292-4527

@bryanashton

National Listserv: go.osu.edu/natfinwell

National Summit: nscfw.org

The 2016 National Summit on Collegiate Financial Wellness will be 

held June 15th – 17th

at The Ohio State University.
EXHIBIT 32.2

UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLC

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of United Maritime Group, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason Grant, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLCBy:

/s/ Jason GrantJason GrantChief Financial Officer
(duly authorized signatory, principal financial officer of the Company)Date: March 30, 2011
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50244

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISIDRO SALAS-FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-2137-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Isidro SalasFlores raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

SMALL DUCT, HIGH VELOCITY (SDHV) STANDARDS (EE-RM/STD-02-330) and CENTRAL AIR-CONDITIONER TEST PROCEDURE (EE-RM/TP-02-002) PUBLIC WORKSHOP Forrestal Building, Room 1 E-245 Friday, December 13, 2002 9:00 a.m . - 4:00 p.m. Agenda Purpose of Workshop: To discuss and receive comments on: 1) the Engineering and Life-Cycle-Cost analyses proposed for use in a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking to set efficiency standards for small duct high velocity central air conditioners and heat pumps, and 2) several central air conditioner and heat pump test procedure issues 9:00 a.m. Introduction and Welcome 9:15 a.m. SDHV Standards ( EE-RM / STD-02-330)

o Engineering Analysis o Life-Cycle Cost Analysis 10:30 a.m. BREAK 10:45 a.m. Discussion of Comments /Issues 11:45 a.m. Wrap- up and Workshop Conclusion for SDHV Standards

12:00 a.m. Break for Lunch

1:00 P.M. Introduction and Welcome 1:15 p.m. Central Air-Conditioner Test Procedure (EE-RM /TP-02-002) 2:45 p. m. Discussion of Comments / Issues 3:45 p. m. Wrap-up and Workshop Conclusion 4:00 p. m. Adjourn
11/01/2011 14:58 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS iaoOI/001 

BRIAN A WALLAESA 

In the matter of: 

Federal Aviation 

Administration, 

V. 

BRIAN WALLAESA 

Complainant ) 

Respondent. ) 

RECEIVED 

NOV ~ I 201t 

HEARING DOCKET 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-0628 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPIOWPOOIO 

Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder 

NOTICE OF INABILITY TO SETTLE NOVEMBER L 2011 ^s' 

1 

Pursuant to instructions from the Administrative Law Jud&c in the U 

ORDER OF TIIE CHIEF ADMDSUSTRATIVE LAW JUDGE FOLLOWING en 

PREHEARING CONFERENCE Dated October 20, 2011: 

1. Both parties will pursue action as set forth by the Administrative Law 

Judge in said document. The Respondent will expect documentation from 

Complainant by November 15, 2011. 

2. The Respondent will provide all parties copy of reply brief no later than 

November 22,2011. 

Respectfully Submitted,. .••-'"• 

Brian A. Wailaesa 

Respondent 

11272 Wortham Crest Circle 

Manassas, VA 20109 

(570) 778-1335 

Dated November 1,2011