alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
06/30/96.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        06/30/96
<PERIOD-END>                             06/30/96
<CASH>                                      87614
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            87614
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30211
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                304257
<COMMON>                                   109429
<OTHER-SE>                                (356283)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87614
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3003
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (13865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (13865)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        

</TABLE>
#### In re ESTATE of Albert WEBER, Deceased.

No. 76-2354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1977.

*1109James L. S. Bowdish of Crary, Buchanan & Meginniss, Stuart, for appellant.

John B. McCracken of Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the interpretation of the following clause in a will:

> All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, whether real, personal or mixed, and wheresoever situate and of whatsoever nature, I give, devise and bequeath to EDWARD BROWN, as Trustee for the minors, BRUCE BROWN and PAUL BROWN, all of Route 2, Blackburn Road, Quarryville, Pennsylvania, share and share alike, and to BARBARA HINKLE, 917 North Flagler Drive, # 403, West Palm Beach, Florida, respectively, share and share alike.

The trial court construed this provision to mean that Barbara Hinkle would receive one-half of the residuary estate and Edward Brown, as trustee, would receive one-half. We believe that the trial court’s construction was correct, and the order on appeal is hereby affirmed.

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.
#### In the Interest of Dirk Allen ELFERDINK, a child.

Nos. 69-46, 69-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 17, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 20, 1969.

Richard M. Gale, Miami, and Prebish & Masin, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed for further proceedings consistent with Machwart v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 222 So.2d 38.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66030-66031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-240; RM-8946, RM-9019]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Lockport and Amherst, NY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Kevin O'Kane, allots Channel

[[Page 66031]]

221A to Amherst, NY, as the community's first local FM service. See 61 
FR 65509, December 13, 1996. The request of Culver Communications Corp. 
to allot Channel 221A to Lockport, NY, is denied. Channel 221A can be 
allotted to Amherst in compliance with the Commission's minimum mileage 
separation requirements with respect to all domestic allotments without 
the imposition of a site restriction, at coordinates 42-58-42 North 
Latitude and 78-48-00 West Longitude. The allotment is short-spaced to 
Channel 219C1, St. Catharines, Ontario, Channels 221C1/221B, Brantford, 
Ontario, and Channel 222B, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada. However, 
concurrence by the Canadian government has been received in the Amherst 
allotment as a specially negotiated sort-spaced allotment. With this 
action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective January 20, 1998. A filing window for Channel 221A at 
Amherst, New York, will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue 
of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the 
Commission in a subsequent order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 96-240, adopted November 19, 1997, and 
released December 5, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under New York, is 
amended by adding Amherst, Channel 221A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-32890 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN SANDERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:13-cr-00449-LMB-1; 1:15-cv-00246-LMB)

Submitted: November 30, 2015 Decided: December 30, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Ledbetter Taylor, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer Anne Clarke, Sean 

Phillip Tonolli, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Demetrio Sanders seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Sanders has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny Sanders’ motion to 

appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |

|   | /s/                Robert Scott Lorimer |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | ROBERT                SCOTT LORIMER     |   |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer  |   |
|   | November                11, 2005        |   |

Index
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We have issued our report dated July 14, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Global Investor Services, Inc. on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No.1, for the year ended March 31, 2011. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Global Investor Services, Inc.   on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-153918, effective October 9, 2008, File No. 333-168582, effective August 6, 2010).








/s/  RBSM LLP


New York, New York


July 19, 2011
#### BOLDUC v. BUSSER.

No. 38340.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So.2d 765.
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 10.31

                      FIFTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

     This Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement (this "Amendment") is entered into
as of December 11, 1998, between Bank of America National Trust and Savings
Association ("Bank") and K-Swiss, Inc. ("Borrower"), with reference to the
following:

                                    Recitals
                                    --------

     A.   Bank and Borrower are parties to that certain Credit Agreement dated
as of March 25, 1994, as modified by  amendments dated as of June 29, 1995,
August 12, 1996, July 29, 1997, and September 9, 1998 (as amended, the "Credit
Agreement").

     B.   Bank and Borrower now desire to further amend the Credit Agreement on
the terms and conditions set forth below.

                                   Agreement
                                   ---------

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.   Definitions.  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this
Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Credit Agreement.

     2.   Amendments.  The Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows:

          (a) Paragraph 2.5(a) is amended in full to read as follows:

               "(a) The total of the undrawn and the drawn and unreimbursed
     amount (other than any amount added to the outstanding advances pursuant to
     Paragraph 2.5(e)) of standby letters of credit outstanding at any one time
     under the Revolving Facility may not exceed (i) Thirty Million Dollars
     ($30,000,000) for letters of credit issued to support the Borrower's
     performance of obligations in connection with purchases of inventory and
     (ii) Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) for all other letters of credit."

         (b) Except as hereby amended, all of the terms and conditions of the
Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     3.   Representations and Warranties.  Borrower represents and warrants to
Bank that:  (a) no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing under the
Credit Agreement, (b) the representations and warranties in the Credit Agreement
are true as of the date of this Amendment, (c) this Amendment is within
Borrower's powers, has been duly authorized, and does not conflict with
Borrower's organizational papers, and (d) this Amendment does not conflict with
any law, agreement, or obligation by which Borrower is bound.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written.


BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST           K-SWISS, INC.
AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION


By: /S/ Richard J. Pankow                By: /S/ George Powlick
    ------------------------------           -----------------------------------
        Richard J. Pankow                        George Powlick
        Vice President                           Vice President-Finance
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Reports Tagged with Advertising and Marketing The Mobile Wireless Web, Data Services and Beyond: Emerging Technologies and Consumer Issues (Feb 2002
 )
          Marketing Violent Entertainment to Children: A One-Year Follow-Up Review of Industry Practices in the Motion Picture, Music Recording & Electronic Game Industries (Dic 2001
 )
          Marketing Violent Entertainment to Children: A Six-Month Follow-Up Review of Industry Practices in the Motion Picture, Music Recording & Electronic Game Industries (Ago 2001
 )
          Report to Congress On The Electronic Signatures In Global And National Commerce Act: The Consumer Consent Provision in Section 101(c)(1)(C)(ii) (Jun 2001
 )
          Consumer Protection in the Global Electronic Marketplace: Looking Ahead (Sep 2000
 )
          Marketing Violent Entertainment To Children: A Review of Self-Regulation and Industry Practices in the Motion Picture, Music Recording & Electronic Game Industries (Sep 2000
 )
          Self-Regulation in the Alcohol Industry: A Federal Trade Commission Report to Congress (Sep 1999
 )
        
        
                  Paginación
    Primera página
            « First
                          Página anterior
            ‹‹
                                      Página1
              Página2
              Página3
              Página4
              Página actual5
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
#### James A. TURNER v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50522.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 30, 1978.

Leon E. Provine, Grenada, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Grenada County; Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., BROOM and LEE, JJ., and DAN M. LEE, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-15167 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-23720-JAL

MATTIE LOMAX, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(July 17, 2012)

Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 11-15167 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
Mattie Lomax, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of

her notice of removal of her criminal case and her attempt to initiate a § 1983

claim. Lomax asserts that the district court erred in finding that her claim, which

she contends to have filed in Florida state court, was frivolous and intended to

harass the arresting officers associated with a state battery proceeding against her.

In her notice of removal, Lomax contended that 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1) gave

her grounds for removal to federal court. Section 1443(1) allows for removal of

“criminal prosecutions, commenced in a State court . . . [a]gainst any person who

is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of such State a right under any law

providing for the equal civil rights of citizens of the United States, or of all

persons within the jurisdiction thereof[.]” 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1). To qualify under

§ 1443(1), Lomax “must show both that the right upon which [she] rel[ies] is a

right under any law providing for equal civil rights, and that [she is] denied or

cannot enforce that right in the courts of” Florida. Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S.

780, 788, 86 S. Ct. 1783, 1788 (1966) (alteration and quotations omitted). It is

clear that Lomax’s notice of removal failed to explain how she meets this

standard, especially the requirement that she be denied or unable to enforce her

rights in state court. Accordingly, there was no basis for Lomax to remove her

criminal case to federal court. In any action removed from state court, “[i]f at any

2

Case: 11-15167 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter

jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (emphasis added). 

Thus, to the extent that Lomax removed her state criminal proceeding to district

court, the district court should have remanded that portion of her case to state

court, rather than dismissing it. Id.

The district court construed Lomax’s notice of removal as also trying to

institute a § 1983 claim. The district court dismissed that claim as frivolous and

harassing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We discern no abuse of discretion in

that decision. See Bilal v. Driver, 251 F.3d 1346, 1349 (11th Cir. 2001). 

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.1

Lomax’s request for oral argument is DENIED. 1

3

Case: 11-15167 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We have issued our report dated February 4, 2003, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of K•Swiss Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements ofK•Swiss Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36505, effective August 23, 1990, File No. 33-77258, effective April 4, 1994, File No. 33-95650, effective August 10, 1995, File No. 333-79641, effective May 28, 1999, and File No. 333-91864, effective July7, 2002) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-37895, effective October 17, 1997 and File No. 333-60043, effective August 5, 1998). 

 

/s/    GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

February 4, 2003
<PAGE> 20

                                                                  Exhibit 12


           AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                (Unaudited)




                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                        2001          2000
                                                      (dollars in thousands)

Earnings:
  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                             $106,736      $ 98,393
  Interest expense                                     167,238       160,541
  Implicit interest in rents                             4,277         4,013

Total earnings                                        $278,251      $262,947


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                    $167,238      $160,541
  Implicit interest in rents                             4,277         4,013

Total fixed charges                                   $171,515      $164,554


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        1.62          1.60