alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175
<INVENTORY>                                         14
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,614
<PP&E>                                           3,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,922
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,721
<SALES>                                         30,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,685
<CGS>                                           24,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                       280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,188
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
I, E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endingJune 27, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.        Dated:  August 11, 2004 /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board,   President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000025212
<NAME> COURIER CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                              30
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,474<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,191
<INVENTORY>                                     11,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,552
<PP&E>                                         102,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,750
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,170<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,446
<SALES>                                        111,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,345
<CGS>                                           84,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   133
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,140
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS.
<F2>OTHER SE INCLUDES TREASURY STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### T. NORLEY et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, Florida, Appellee.

No. 43298.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 28, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0641 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GILBERT CAMPA,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 12 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 5 2023

06/05/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0641
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leo Johnson, Also Known as Leo Morris, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 258]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered October 27, 1998, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was punished for exercising his' right to a trial *(see, People v Goolsby,*213 AD2d 722). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit *(see, People v Whalen,*59 NY2d 273; *People v Brown,*48 NY2d 388, 394; *People v Simmons,*213 AD2d 433; *People v Marquez,*188 AD2d 619). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
#### Fannie HOLLINGSHEAD, Appellant, v. FLAGLER SALES CORP., a Florida corporation, and Anthony Vintini, Appellees.

No. 70-340.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 16, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Spiro J. CORNAROS, Petitioner, v. The CARILLON HOTEL, Employers Service Corporation, and Florida Department of Commerce Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 39035.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 13, 1970.

Allen Clements and Sam Bloom, Miami, for petitioner.

Eugene E. Williams, of Williams & Jabara, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

ADKINS, Justice.

This case arose when petitioner Cornaros injured himself in the course of his employment at The Carillon Hotel September 22, 1966.

The Judge of Industrial Claims was presented with-conflicting evidence as to application of Fla.Stat. § 440.02(12), F.S.A., which provides that for purposes of establishing compensation, wages of an employee will include tips or gratuities “only when such gratuities are received with the knowledge of the employer.”

The employer offered business records showing the amount of wages and gratuities upon which it contended benefits should be based. Claimant Cornaros contended the records-did not reflect the true, higher amount of gratuities which he had reported to the employer. The Judge of Industrial Claims resolved the conflict in favor of claimant, and rejected the evidence offered by the employer.

The Industrial Relations Commission reversed, holding that the Judge erred in rejecting the evidence offered by the employer, business records, and accepting the evidence of the claimant, oral testimony, and ordered that compensation be recomputed based on business records. We grant claimant’s petition for writ of certiorari pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 440.27(1), F.S.A., to determine whether the Industrial Relations Commission erred in overturning the decision of the Industrial Claims Judge.

We conclude the Commission substituted its judgment of the evidence for that of the Industrial Claims Judge, whose responsibility it was to weigh the evidence and make findings of fact which, if supported by the evidence, must be accepted by the Commission. The decision of the Industrial Relations Commission is quashed as to this question, and the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims is reinstated. This *479cause is remanded to the Commission for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Petitioner’s attorneys’ fees in this Court are awarded in the amount of $350.00.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67043-67044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33470]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 944]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 143, Sacramento, California Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, an application from the Sacramento-Yolo Port District, 
grantee

[[Page 67044]]

of Foreign-Trade Zone 143, for authority to expand FTZ 143-Site 1 (to 
686 acres) and Site 2 (to 1,280 acres) in the Sacramento, California, 
area, was filed by the Board on March 19, 1997 (FTZ Docket 17-97, 62 FR 
15459, 4/1/97);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in Federal 
Register and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 143 is approved, subject to the Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of December 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33470 Filed 12-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 21****SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**1. Swift Transportation Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 2. Swift Leasing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 3. Common Market Distributing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 4. Sparks Finance Co., Inc., a Nevada corporation 5. Cooper Motor Lines, Inc., a South Carolina corporation 6. Common Market Equipment Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 7. Swift Transportation Co. of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation 8. Swift Logistics Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 9. Swift Transportation Corporation, a Nevada corporation 10. Swift Receivables Corporation, a Delaware corporation 11. M.S. Carriers, Inc., a Tennessee corporation 12. M.S. Carriers Warehousing & Distribution, Inc., a Tennessee corporation 13. M.S. Carriers Logistics de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation 14 Swift Transportation of Puerto Rico, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation 15. TransMex, Inc. S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation 16. Mohave Transportation Captive Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation 17. Swift Intermodal Ltd., a Nevada corporation 18. Swift International S.A. de C.V. 19. TMX Administracion S.A. de C.V.
72
BE
AEROSPACE, INC.


EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
REQUIRED BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of BE Aerospace, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas P.
McCaffrey, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      February 26, 2009
                                        By:
                                        /s/
      Thomas
      P. McCaffreyThomas
      P. McCaffreySenior
      Vice President andChief
      Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
 fiscal year ended December 29, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Tony  Isaac, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



1.        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





| | /s/ Tony  Isaac
        Tony Isaac
        President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 29, 2019



The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report as a separate disclosure
document of the Company or the certifying officers.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

Subsidiaries of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc.

 
| **Name**                       | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of   Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|
| ARCA   California, Inc.   |       | California                               |
| ARCA   Canada Inc              |       | Ontario, Canada                          |
| ARCA   Advanced Processing LLC |       | Minnesota                                |

 

ARCA Advanced Processing LLC is a joint venture between the Company and 4301 Operations LLC.  The Company owns a 50% interest in the entity.

 

All other subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Company.

 

----
05/08/20 11 15 :20 FAX 814 447 3747 CA S CS 1410 03/ 003 

# . Inventory 

# Expert

# Service A division of the American Chemical Society\ Phone: 800-631-1884, 614-447-3870 Fu: 614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@c;as.org Web: www .cai.org/producrs/dlentl INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT IES-ORDER NUMBER: 1 7 1723 REGISTRY 

### NUMBER: 59597 - 38-1 CA INDEX NAME 1 -0ctanesulfonic acid, 3,3,4,4 , 5,5 , 6,6,7,7,8,8,6-tridecafluoro-, potassium salt (1;1)
Please print the above CA Index Name on the

**apprgpria~e pa~e**  of your PMN. 

# 0

CAS If this box is checkeQ, CAS bas made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same correotion(s) to your PMN before submitting it to t4e EPA.

25<40 Ofentan,y River Road P.O. Sox 3343 Columbus, Ohio '1321 0-033'1 USA
#### Arthur MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-412.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 1, 1972.

Judge L. Luckey, Jr., Public Defender, and Andrew Mirabole, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

In this case Arthur Moore was informed against in the Hillsborough County Court *195of Record for the unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, to-wit: heroin, was arraigned on said charge, pleaded guilty, and was thereupon sentenced to serve five years in the State Prison. He thereafter, in his own proper person, filed his notice of appeal from said judgment and sentence.

The local Public Defender, appointed to represent him upon this appeal, has filed brief in this Court stating that “it is clear that the . . . plea of guilty was entered in the presence of counsel and was made voluntarily, without coercion, and with a full understanding of its possible consequences and with approval of appellant’s counsel.” It was further stated that “The trial court asked the Appellant extensive questions at the time of the acceptance of his guilty plea and it was determined after such questioning, that the plea was freely and voluntarily made with knowledge of its consequences. The record confirms the acceptance of the guilty plea by the trial court,” citing numerous cases from this 2nd District Court. The brief further states that “A close examination of the record does not reveal even a hint of jurisdictional or fundamental defects and the Notice of Appeal filed by the Appellant in proper person does not allege any jurisdictional or fundamental defects”, concluding with the observation that “this appeal is wholly frivolous, without merit and cannot be supported by law or logic.” For such reason the Public Defender “requests to be relieved as attorney of record”, citing as authority Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.

Thereafter, on July 10, 1972, this Court, having caused a copy of said brief to be served upon appellant Moore, entered order herein allowing appellant, within 30 days thereafter, if he so desired, to file an additional brief calling this Court’s attention to any matters that he feels should be considered in connection with the appeal in this cause. On August 9, 1972, appellant filed his additional brief.

In justice to appellant, we have carefully examined the entire files and records in this Court upon this appeal, as well as the brief filed by appellant, and find no merit to the points raised therein. Neither do we find anything in the record which would warrant or justify this Court in disturbing the judgment of conviction appealed. It is thereupon ordered that said judgment be—

Affirmed.

LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Leroney HILLS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 11, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARK-DULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against, tried, and found guilty of robbery. The proof of guilt was clear and convincing. On this appeal the only substantial question presented is whether the court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress the evidence relative to a gun found under the steps leading to his mother’s home, where he also lived.

The evidence is clear and undisputed that the mother gave an informed oral consent to the search. No error appears. See Tomlinson v. State, 129 Fla. 658, 176 So. 543 (1937); Rivers v. State, Fla.1969, 226 So.2d 337.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99

 

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of A.T. Cross Company, a Rhode Island corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.