66600 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 1997 / Notices

effort to reduce paperwork and

respondent burden, invites the general

public and other Federal agencies to

take this opportunity to comment on

proposed and/or continuing information

collections, as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.

3506(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before February 17,

1998.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments

to Linda Engelmeier, Departmental

Clearance Officer, Department of

Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the information collection

instrument(s) and instructions should

be directed to Stephen Baker,

Department of Commerce, 14th &

Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 6877,

Washington, DC, 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Abstract

The information is collected as

supporting documentation for license

applications to export petroleum (crude

oil) and used by licensing officers to

determine the exporter’s compliance

with the 5 statutes governing this

collection.

II. Method of Collection

The information is provided in

written form.

III. Data

OMB Number: 0694–0027.

Form Number: BXA–748P.

Type of Review: Regular submission

for extension of a currently approved

collection.

Affected Public: Individuals,

businesses or other for-profit and notfor-profit institutions.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

24.

Estimated Time Per Response: 4–12

hours per response.

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 192.

Estimated Total Annual Cost: $2,880.

IV. Request for Comments

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the proposed collection of information

is necessary for the proper performance

of the functions of the agency, including

whether the information shall have

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden

(including hours and cost) of the

proposed collection of information; (c)

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the

burden of the collection of information

on respondents, including through the

use of automated collection techniques

or other forms of information

technology.

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of this information collection;

they will also become a matter of public

record.

Dated: December 15, 1997.

Linda Engelmeier,

Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office

of Management and Organization.

[FR Doc. 97–33176 Filed 12–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration

Notification of Commercial Invoices

That Do Not Contain a Destination

Control Statement

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment

request.

SUMMARY: The Department of

Commerce, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork and

respondent burden, invites the general

public and other Federal agencies to

take this opportunity to comment on

proposed and/or continuing information

collections, as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.

3506(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before February 17,

1998.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments

to Linda Engelmeier, Departmental

Clearance Officer, Department of

Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington

DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the information collection

instrument(s) and instructions should

be directed to Stephen Baker,

Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 6877,

Washington, DC, 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Abstract

To insure that U.S. exports go only to

legally authorized destinations, ‘‘a

destination control statement’’ is

required to be entered on all commercial

invoices and bills of lading or air

waybills covering an export from the

United States. The same statement must

appear on all copies of all such shipping

documents that apply to the same

shipment. The exporter has the primary

responsibility for assuring that the

statement is entered on the commercial

invoice, regardless of whether he

prepares this document. If a forwarder,

a carrier acting as a forwarder, or any

other party prepares, presents, and/or

executes a commercial invoice, that

person is also responsible for assuring

that an appropriate statement is entered

on the document. Consequently, when a

forwarding agent finds the

documentation lacks the appropriate

destination control statement, then he/

she is required to notify the exporter of

the problem. The forwarder must obtain

a written assurance from the exporter

that all copies have been corrected.

II. Method of Collection

This collection is a written

requirement between freight forwarders

and exporters.

III. Data

OMB Number: 0694–0038.

Form Number: None.

Type of Review: Regular submission

for extension of a currently approved

collection.

Affected Public: Individuals,

businesses or other for-profit and notfor-profit institutions.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

40.

Estimated Time Per Response: 16

minutes per response.

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 11.

Estimated Total Annual Cost: $420.

IV. Request for Comments

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the proposed collection of information

is necessary for the proper performance

of the functions of the agency, including

whether the information shall have

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden

(including hours and cost) of the

proposed collection of information; (c)

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the

burden of the collection of information

on respondents, including through the

use of automated collection techniques

or other forms of information

technology.

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of this information collection;
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 1997 / Notices 66601

they will also become a matter of public

record.

Dated: December 15, 1997.

Linda Engelmeier,

Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office

of Management and Organization.

[FR Doc. 97–33177 Filed 12–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 936]

Grant of Authority for Subzone Status,

Diesel Technology Company (Inc.)

(Diesel Engine Fuel Injection

Components), Kentwood, Michigan

Pursuant to its authority under the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u),

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, by an Act of Congress

approved June 18, 1934, an Act ‘‘To

provide for the establishment * * * of

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of

the United States, to expedite and

encourage foreign commerce, and for

other purposes,’’ as amended (19 U.S.C.

81a–81u) (the FTZ Act), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) is

authorized to grant to qualified

corporations the privilege of

establishing foreign-trade zones in or

adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15

CFR part 400) provide for the

establishment of special-purpose

subzones when existing zone facilities

cannot serve the specific use involved;

Whereas, an application from the

Kent Ottawa Muskegon Foreign Trade

Zone Authority, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 189, for authority to

establish special-purpose subzone status

for the diesel engine fuel injection

components manufacturing facilities of

the Diesel Technology Company (Inc.),

in Kentwood, Michigan, was filed by the

Board on October 31, 1996, and notice

inviting public comment was given in

the Federal Register (FTZ Docket 80–96,

61 FR 58036, 11–12–96); and,

Whereas, the Board adopts the

findings and recommendations of the

examiner’s report, and finds that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and

that approval of the application is in the

public interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby

grants authority for subzone status at the

Diesel Technology Company (Inc.),

facilities in Kentwood, Michigan

(Subzone 189A), at the locations

described in the application, subject to

the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,

including § 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of

December 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–33239 Filed 12–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–25–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 938]

Approval of Manufacturing Activity

Within Foreign-Trade Zone 38,

Spartanburg, South Carolina; Zeuna

Sta ̈rker USA, Inc. (Automotive Exhaust

Systems)

Pursuant to its authority under the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u)

(the Act), the Foreign-Trade Zones

Board (the Board) adopts the following

Order:

Whereas, § 400.28(a)(2) of the Board’s

regulations, requires approval of the

Board prior to commencement of new

manufacturing/processing activity

within existing zone facilities;

Whereas, the South Carolina State

Ports Authority, grantee of FTZ 38, has

requested authority under § 400.28(a)(2)

of the Board’s regulations on behalf of

Zeuna Sta ̈rker USA, Inc., to manufacture

automotive exhaust systems under zone

procedures within FTZ 38—Site 4,

Spartanburg, South Carolina (filed 2–

18–97; FTZ Doc. 10–97, 62 FR 10022, 3–

5–97);

Whereas, the Board adopts the

findings and recommendation of the

examiner’s report, including a

recommended restriction on stainless

steel pipe, and finds that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and the

Board’s regulations are satisfied and that

the proposal is in the public interest,

subject to restriction;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby

approves the request subject to the Act

and the Board’s regulations, including

§ 400.28, and further subject to a

restriction requiring that privileged

foreign status (19 CFR 146.41) must be

elected on all foreign origin stainless

steel pipe admitted to FTZ 38 for the

Zeuna Sta ̈rker USA, Inc., activity, as

indicated in the application.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of

December 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–33240 Filed 12–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–25–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order NO. 940]

Grant of Authority For Subzone Status

Polaris Industries, Inc. (Small SparkIgnition Engines) Osceola, Wisconsin

Pursuant to its authority under the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u),

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, by an Act of Congress

approved June 18, 1934, an Act ‘‘To

provide for the establishment * * * of

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of

the United States, to expedite and

encourage foreign commerce, and for

other purposes,’’ as amended (19 U.S.C.

81a-81u) (the FTZ Act), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) is

authorized to grant to qualified

corporations the privilege of

establishing foreign-trade zones in or

adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;

WHEREAS, the Board’s regulations (15

CFR Part 400) provide for the

establishment of special-purpose

subzones when existing zone facilities

cannot serve the specific use involved;

WHEREAS, an application from Brown

County, Wisconsin, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 167, for authority to

establish special-purpose subzone status

for the small internal-combustion

engine manufacturing plant of Polaris

Industries, Inc., in Osceola, Wisconsin,

was filed by the Board on December 11,

1996, and notice inviting public

comment was given in the Federal

Register (FTZ Docket 84–96, 61 FR

66652, 12–18–96); and,

Whereas, the Board adopts the

findings and recommendations of the

examiner’s report, and finds that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and

that approval of the application is in the

public interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby

grants authority for subzone status at the

Polaris Industries, Inc., plant in Osceola,

Wisconsin (Subzone 167B), at the

location described in the application,