alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of GLOBAL CONDIMENTS, INC. on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 /s/ CHARLES C. HERLOCHER

Charles C. Herlocher CEO

Dated: March 30, 2011



/s/ CHARLES C. HERLOCHER

Charles C. Herlocher

CFO

Dated: March 30, 2011
  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 1, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   March 17, 2011 | /s/Edward   R. Cameron                  |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                         | Edward   R. Cameron                     |
|                         | President   and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2545 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2545

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the role of doctors of 
podiatric medicine in the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ROLE OF DOCTORS OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE IN DEPARTMENT OF 
VETERANS AFFAIRS.
    (a) Clarification of Role.--Section 7306 of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)--
            (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ``a Director of Podiatric 
        Service,'';
            (B) by redesignating paragraph (10) as paragraph (11); and
            (C) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following new 
        paragraph:
        ``(10) A Podiatric Medical Director, who shall be a qualified 
    doctor of podiatric medicine and who shall be responsible to the 
    Under Secretary for Health for the operation of the Podiatric 
    Service.'';
        (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ``podiatric medicine,'' 
    after ``doctors of medicine,''; and
        (3) in subsection (c), by striking ``and (8)'' and inserting 
    ``(8), and (10)''.
    (b) Clarification of Pay Grade.--Section 7404 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ``, podiatrists,'' after 
    ``physicians''; and
        (2) in subsection (b), in the first heading of the list 
    following the colon, by striking ``PODIATRIST'' and inserting 
    ``PODIATRIST (DPM)''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 21.1

TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

|                                            |  |                              |  |                                                 
|------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Name of Corporation                         |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | % of VotingSecuritiesOwned by itsImmediateParent
|Transatlantic Reinsurance Company           |  | New York, U.S.A.             |  |                                                 
|Putnam Reinsurance Company                  |  | New York, U.S.A.             |  |                                                 
|Trans Re Zurich                             |  | Zurich, Switzerland          |  |                                                 
|Transatlantic Re (Argentina) S.A.           |  | Argentina                    |  |                                                 
|Transatlantic Re (Brasil) Ltda              |  | Brazil                       |  |                                                 
|Transatlantic Polska Sp. z o.o              |  | Warsaw, Poland               |  |                                                 
|TRC (PANAMÁ) S.A.                           |  | Panama                       |  |                                                 
|Professional Risk Management Services, Inc. |  | Delaware, U.S.A.             |  |                                                 





| 
|-
|*



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Consolidated Earnings and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         2,851
<SECURITIES>                                  43,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                 64,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (1,315)
<INVENTORY>                                   43,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             163,265
<PP&E>                                       131,129
<DEPRECIATION>                               (58,390)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               278,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         47,320
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         169
<OTHER-SE>                                   216,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 278,265
<SALES>                                      215,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             215,900
<CGS>                                         82,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 82,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               33,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                  10,429
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           22,696
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  22,696
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.42



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50477 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR BELTRAN-CASARES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-99-CR-686-1

-------------------- December 14, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Oscar Beltran-Casares appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Beltran argues that his prior felony conviction was an element of the offense of the instant conviction that had to be alleged in the indictment. Beltran acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000).No. 00-50477 -2- Beltran's argument is foreclosed by Almendarez- Torres , 523 U.S. at 235.
AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7240

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANDREW R. SPENCE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-437-JFM, CA-97-458-JFM) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 13, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Andrew R. Spence seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spence , Nos. CR-88-437-JFM; CA-97-458-JFM (D. Md. June 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 20, 2015

t0513

Order 

Clerk

May 20, 2015

149717

BRENDA PRICE, Personal Representative of the

Estate of ROGER STANLEY PRICE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149717

COA: 311188

St Clair CC: 10-000738-NH

PORT HURON HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 10, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Terry L. BURGESS, a minor, by and through his next friend and natural father, Luther Burgess, and Luther Burgess and Annie Lee Burgess, his wife, Appellants, v. Frank WYLEY and Jeraline Braker Wyley, and City of Riviera Beach, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 14, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Joseph P. Metzger, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  528,786              20,346,863
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         18,934,681               6,996,472
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,463,467              27,343,335
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     528,786                 767,052
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,934,681              26,576,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,463,467              27,343,335
<TRADING-REVENUE>                          (1,223,878)                   4,836
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           396,925               1,118,910
<COMMISSIONS>                                  662,247               1,936,603
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (979,969)                (58,822)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (979,969)                (58,822)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (979,969)                (58,822)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.19)                  (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.19)                  (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Escalon Medical Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. O’Connor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: September 28, 2015





/s/    Robert M. O’ConnorRobert M. O’ConnorChief Financial Officer
#### Shedrick LANE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 8, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Willie D. FORD, Appellant, v. Inez P. FORD, Appellee.

No. 70-663.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 10, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60856

Cecilia De La Paz Vasquez-De Martinez; Karla Dianara 

Martinez-Vasquez, 

Petitioners,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of the Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA Nos. A208 375 390, A208 375 391

Before Smith, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Cecilia De La Paz Vazquez-De Martinez and her minor daughter, 

Karla Dianara Martinez-Vasquez, are natives and citizens of El Salvador.

Mother applied for asylum, 8 U.S.C. § 1158, and withholding of removal, 

§ 1231(b)(3) for herself and Daughter. The Board of Immigration appeals 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 19, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60856 Document: 00516399760 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2022
No. 21-60856

2

affirmed denial of Mother’s applications, and Mother timely petitioned us to 

review the BIA’s order. During the pendency of that petition, though, 

Mother passed away.

Our jurisdiction is limited by Article III to “Cases” and 

“Controversies.” U.S. CONST. art. III § 2. “Inherent in the case-orcontroversy requirement is the doctrine of mootness; federal courts lack 

jurisdiction ‘when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief 

whatsoever to the prevailing party.” Mendoza-Flores v. Rosen, 983 F.3d 845, 

847 (5th Cir. 2020) (quoting United States v. Vega, 960 F.3d 669, 672 (5th 

Cir. 2020)). Similarly, we lack jurisdiction over unexhausted arguments on 

petition for review from the BIA’s final order of removal. See

8 U.S.C.§ 1252(d)(1); Omari v. Holder, 562 F.3d 314, 320–21 (5th Cir. 2009).

The Government now asks us to dismiss this petition for want of 

jurisdiction. We agree that we must. Mother’s passing means we can no 

longer grant effectual relief to her, mooting her claims for relief. McCallister 

v. Att’y Gen. of United States, 444 F.3d 178, 184 (3d Cir. 2006). Following 

Mother’s passing we ordered Counsel to file an opening brief for Daughter. 

See Vasquez-De Martinez v. Garland, 34 F.4th 412 (5th Cir. 2022) (per 

curiam). Counsel has, but Daughter’s brief now makes plain that she did not 

seek relief independently of Mother’s application. Rather, she sought relief 

in the BIA solely as a derivative beneficiary of Mother’s application. See

§ 1153(d). That means Daughter’s petition is now moot to the extent it relies 

on Mother’s. See McCallister, 444 F.3d at 184–85. To the extent Daughter

now seeks independent relief, the BIA has yet to consider Daughter’s 

unexhausted arguments.

1 See Omari, 562 F.3d at 320–21. Therefore, we 

GRANT the Government’s motion to dismiss and DISMISS this petition.

1 Daughter’s motion to reopen her case with the BIA is now pending.

Case: 21-60856 Document: 00516399760 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/19/2022
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Michael G. LACEY v. Bernard J. BAGERT, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 60753.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Michael G. Lacey, applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ denied; Mandamus application moot. The trial court ruled on the application November 18, 1977, denying it.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RAJ I ND ERSI NG H J OH AL, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 35407 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 0 7 5 - RSL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtS . L a s ni k, C hi e f D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T H O M A S , a n dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it J u d g e s . F ed er al p riso n erR ajin d erS in g h Jo h al ap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 2255. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f irm . 

# FI LED JU N 14 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 35407 2 Johal cont ends thathe i s e nt i t l ed t o a se nt enci ng re du ct i on un der U ni ted State s v . Santos , 5 5 3 U .S . 5 0 7 ( 2 0 0 8 ) , b e c au s e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e n h a n c e dh is se nt ence base d u po n the gross r ec ei pt s r ather than the netprofi t s of hi s m on ey l aunde r i ng of

f e ns e . T hi s c ont e nt i on i s f or e c l os e d be c aus e no m e r ge rpr obl e m of the ki nd pos e d i n Santos e x is ts in th is c a s e . See U ni te d State s v . V

an A l s t y ne , 584 F . 3d 803, 814- 17 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( r e a s oni ng tha t , unde r18 U . S . C . § 1956 a nd the re l evantG ui del i nes, “ ‘ proceeds’ m eans ‘ profi t s’ w here vi ew i ng ‘ proceeds’ as ‘r e c e ip ts ’ w o u ldp r e s e n t a‘m e r g e r ’ p r o b le m o f th e k in dth a t tr o u b le dth e p lu r a lity a nd c onc urr e nc e i n Santos ” ) . J oha l a l s o c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d byr e s ol vi ng hi s s e c t i on 2255 m o tio n w ith o u t h o ld in g a n e v id e n tia ryh e a r in g . T h is c o n te n tio n la c k s m e r it. See U ni te d State s v . J

ohns on , 98 8 F . 2d 94 1, 94 5 (9th C i r. 19 93 ) ( “ M er el y c on cl usory st at em ent s i n a § 2 25 5 m ot i on ar e notenou gh t o requi re a heari ng . ”) (i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks and ci t at i on s om i tt ed). B ec au se w e a ff

irm o n th e m er it s, w e d o n o t ad d re ss th e G o v ern m en t’ s u n t i m el i n ess an dp ro ced u ral b ar arg u m en t s. J oha l ’ s m ot i on f

ore xpe di t e d appe a l i s gr a nt e d. AF F I RME D.