alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2487 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to implement any COVID–19 vaccine 

passport system, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2021 

Mr. ROSENDALE (for himself, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. ROY, Ms. HERRELL, Mrs. 

MILLER of Illinois, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. GOODEN of 

Texas, Mr. PERRY, Mrs. HINSON, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. BUDD, 

Mr. GOSAR, Mr. CAWTHORN, Mr. STEUBE, Mrs. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. 

POSEY, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. TIFFANY, Ms. MACE, Mr. JACKSON, 

Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. CLYDE, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK, and Mr. FALLON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and in addition 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to implement any 

COVID–19 vaccine passport system, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxpayer Funding 

5 for Vaccine Passports Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2487 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO IM2 PLEMENT ANY COVID–19 VACCINE PASSPORT 

3 SYSTEM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, no funds appropriated under any Act may be 

6 used for purposes of implementing, enforcing, or assisting 

7 in the establishment of a COVID–19 vaccine passport sys8 tem (as defined in subsection (c)). 

9 (b) STATE AND LOCAL USE OF COVID–19 VACCINE

10 PASSPORT SYSTEMS.—Notwithstanding any other provi11 sion of law, in the case of a State or a unit of local govern12 ment that implements, enforces, or assists in the establish13 ment of a COVID–19 vaccine passport system, no funds 

14 appropriated under the Coronavirus Preparedness and Re15 sponse Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public 

16 Law 116–123), the Families First Coronavirus Response 

17 Act (Public Law 116–127), the CARES Act (Public Law 

18 116–136), the Paycheck Protection Program and Health 

19 Care Enhancement Act (Public Law 116–139), division M 

20 or N of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public 

21 Law 116–260), or the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 

22 (Public Law 117–2) may be made available to such State 

23 or unit of local government. 

24 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

25 (1) COVID–19 VACCINE PASSPORT SYSTEM.— 

26 The term ‘‘COVID–19 vaccine passport system’’ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2487 IH

1 means a system that requires proof (whether phys2 ical, electronic, or by any other means) of the vac3 cination status of an individual with respect to 

4 COVID–19 as a condition of performing any action. 

5 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of 

6 the several States, the District of Columbia, and 

7 each territory of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### W. L. McKNIGHT, d/b/a Webster Outdoor Advertising Co. (not Inc.), Appellant, v. HIALEAH RACE COURSE, INC., Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc., Tropical Park, Inc., Florida Thoroughbred Council, Florida Thoroughbred Breeders Association, and Florida State Racing Commission, Appellees.

No. 69-926.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 19, 1970.

*553Taylor, Brion, Buker, Hames, Greene & Whitworth, and Robert Paterno, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Shelby Highsmith, Miami, for Florida State Racing Comm., appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeals a final judgment for defendant Florida State Racing Commission entered pursuant to an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. The only point presented upon appeal urges that appellant should have been granted leave to amend. The order dismissing the complaint is dated May 16, 1969. The final judgment is dated October 3, 1969. The evidence does not reflect a request for leave to amend. Under these circumstances we think that the record does not reflect an abuse of discretion by the trial judge. See Sorkin v. Rovin, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 492.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
R. Riedman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company for the period covered by the Report.


                                            /s/ James R. Riedman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            James R. Riedman
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            August 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by Phoenix
Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                       17
Exhibit 32

March 16,
2015
Via EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of ECA Marcellus Trust I (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., Trustee for ECA Marcellus Trust IBy:

/s/ SARAH NEWELL Sarah Newell Vice President and Trust Officer


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1052000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6900000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (167000)
<INVENTORY>                                    3394000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15963000
<PP&E>                                        22263000
<DEPRECIATION>                                15938000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                28225000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         17855000
<BONDS>                                        5947000
<COMMON>                                        231000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4192000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  28225000
<SALES>                                       21080000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              21080000
<CGS>                                         18561000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 18561000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              582000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1256000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1256000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1256000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        


</TABLE>
AFS-13-409-E

July 24, 2013

 Exemption No. 10830

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0507

Ms. Linda Larach Cohen

Parent of Marco Cohen

28 East 22nd Street, Apt. 6

New York, NY 10010

Dear Ms. Cohen:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received June 6, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Marco Cohen for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Marco to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Marco.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Grant

of Exemption No. 9834.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Marco Cohen an exemption from § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Marco is

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary 

to allow him to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Marco’s parents or 

a caregiver accompanying him. Marco Cohen may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind him. In addition, Marco’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of 

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovick

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2458 

To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify that the definition 

of a debt collector includes, in all cases, a person in a business the 

principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security interests. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2021 

Mr. AUCHINCLOSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify 

that the definition of a debt collector includes, in all 

cases, a person in a business the principal purpose of 

which is the enforcement of security interests. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Non-Judicial Fore5 closure Debt Collection Clarification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTERESTS. 

7 Section 803(6) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices 

8 Act (15 U.S.C. 1692a(6)) is amended by striking ‘‘For 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2458 IH

1 the purpose of section 808(6), such term also includes any 

2 person who uses any instrumentality of interstate com3 merce or the mails in any business the principal purpose 

4 of which is the enforcement of security interests.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”)
for the annual period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Christopher M. Mathieu, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|/s/ Christopher M. Mathieu |                         | 
|-------------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|Name:                      | Christopher M. Mathieu  | 
|Title:                     | Chief Financial Officer | 



Date: March 12, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000025212
<NAME> COURIER CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,607<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,166
<INVENTORY>                                     11,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,702
<PP&E>                                          99,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,822
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,691<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,142
<SALES>                                         35,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,306
<CGS>                                           26,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                       712
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38<F3>
        

<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS.
<F2>OTHER SE INCLUDES TREASURY STOCK.
<F3>PER SHARE AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT A THREE-FOR-TWO STOCK
    SPLIT EFFECTED IN THE FORM OF A 50% STOCK DIVIDEND TO BE DISTRIBUTED ON 
    JUNE 1, 1998 TO STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD ON MAY 15, 1998.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### FIDELITY FACTORS, INC. v. FORTUNE FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

No. 50049.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 1, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1978.

Parker, Averill, Funderburk & Butts, David 0. Butts, Jr., Tupelo, for appellant.

O’Barr, Hurlbert & O’Barr, Walter M. O’Barr, Biloxi, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and LEE, JJ., concurring.
#### Johnnie Lee HAMPTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-828.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 16, 1978.

Johnnie Lee Hampton, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Johnnie Lee Hampton, having appealed the denial without hearing of his motion to vacate judgment filed pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, and this court having examined the record submitted and appellant’s motion filed in the trial court, and the court proceeding pursuant to Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(g) finds that the record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief, whereupon, the order appealed is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014 (the Report) of Full Circle Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael J. Sell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Michael J. SellName: Michael J. SellDate:  September 22, 2014
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31870]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-423]

Northeast Nuclear Energy Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (the licensee) to 
withdraw its May 5, 1997, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License No. NPF-49 for the Millstone Nuclear Power 
Station, Unit 3, located in New London County, Connecticut.
    The proposed amendment to Technical Specifications 3.9.1.2 and 
3.9.1.3 and their Bases would have allowed the crediting of soluble 
boron for maintaining k-effective at less than or equal to 0.95 within 
the spent fuel pool rack matrix following a seismic event of a 
magnitude greater than or equal to an operating basis earthquake.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on July 16, 
1997 (62 FR 38135). However, by letter dated November 11, 1997, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated May 5, 1997, and the licensee's letter 
dated November 11, 1997, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. The above documents are available for public inspection at 
the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at 2 the local public document room 
located at the Learning Resources Center, Three Rivers Community-
Technical College, 574 New London Turnpike, Norwich, Connecticut, and 
the Waterford Library, ATTN: Vince Juliano, 49 Rope Ferry Road, 
Waterford, Connecticut.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of November 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James W. Andersen,
Project Manager, Special Projects Office--Licensing, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-31870 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
General Counsel

Assistant General Counsel,

International Affairs

Assistant General Counsel,

General Law, Ethics, & Regulation

Assistant General Counsel,

Enforcement & Intelligence

Assistant General Counsel,

Banking & Finance

Chief Counsel,

Alcohol & Tobacco

Tax &Trade

Chief Counsel, 

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Chief Counsel, 

Public Debt

Chief Counsel, 

United States Mint

Chief Counsel,

Financial Crimes

Enforcement Network

Chief Counsel, 

Financial Management Service

Principal 

Deputy General Counsel

Deputy Assistant 

General Counsel

Legislative Tax Counsel

International Tax Counsel

Benefits Tax Counsel

Deputy Assistant 

General Counsel, General 

Law & Regulation

Deputy Assistant General Counsel

Legal Counsel,

Executive Office of

Asset Forfeiture

Deputy Assistant General Counsel

Legal Counsel,

Community Development

Financial Institutions Fund

Legal Counsel,

Terrorism Risk

Insurance Program

Counselor to the General Counsel

Senior Advisor to the General Counsel

Senior Advisor to the General Counsel 

(Detailed)

Chief Counsel,

Engraving & Printing

Deputy Assistant 

General Counsel, 

Ethics

Chief Counsel, 

Office of Financial Stability

Office of the General Counsel - Department of the Treasury

Deputy General Counsel

Chief Counsel, IRS
#### WESTERN CONTRACTING CORPORATION v. KIRK.

No. 38220.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. So.2d S03. 216