alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2007

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/29 4/2 4/5 20.00 17.00 14.00 57.00 -6.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 4/5 4/9 4/12 8.00 15.00 13.00 57.00 -21.00

4/12 4/16 4/19 8.00 14.00 12.00 57.00 -23.00

4/19 4/23 4/26 8.00 13.00 12.00 55.00 -22.00

4/26 4/30 5/3 8.00 13.00 12.00 52.00 -19.00

5/3 5/7 5/10 8.00 13.00 12.00 42.00 -9.00

5/10 5/14 5/17 8.00 13.00 12.00 42.00 -9.00

5/17 5/21 5/24 15.00 13.00 12.00 43.00 -3.00

5/24 5/29 5/31 15.00 14.00 13.00 45.00 -3.00

5/31 6/4 6/7 10.00 14.00 13.00 45.00 -8.00

6/7 6/11 6/14 9.00 14.00 13.00 45.00 -9.00

6/14 6/18 6/21 9.00 14.00 13.00 50.00 -14.00

6/21 6/25 6/28 9.00 14.00 13.00 49.00 -13.00

480.00 639.00 -159.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

17-DAY BILL 3/28 3/30 17.00 -17.00

Matures 4/16

13-DAY BILL 4/2 4/3 16.00 16.00 0.00

Matures 4/16

12-DAY BILL 4/4 4/5 16.00 16.00 0.00

Matures 4/17

5-DAY BILL 4/10 4/12 15.00 15.00 0.00

Matures 4/17

5-DAY BILL 4/12 4/13 8.00 8.00 0.00

Matures 4/18

14-DAY BILL Matures 6/15 5/31 6/1 25.00 25.00 0.00

8-DAY BILL Matures 6/15 6/6 6/7 12.00 12.00 0.00

-17.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-Year TIPS ® 4/5 4/12 4/16 6.00 -2.00 6.00

5-Year TIPS 4/19 4/24 4/30 8.00 -2.00

2-Year Note 4/23 4/25 4/30 18.00

5-Year Note 4/23 4/26 4/30 13.00 21.60 17.40

3-Year Note 5/2 5/7 5/15 14.00 -2.00

10-Year Note 5/2 5/8 5/15 13.00

30-Year Bond ® 5/2 5/10 5/15 6.00 -3.00 54.60 -21.60

2-Year Note 5/24 5/29 5/31 18.00

5-year Note 5/24 5/30 5/31 13.00 21.40 9.60

10-Year Note® 6/11 6/14 6/15 8.00 8.00

2-Year Note 6/21 6/26 7/2 * 18.00

5-year Note 6/21 6/27 7/2 * 13.00 19.70 11.30

150.00 121.60 26.40

Estimates are italicized

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: -149.60

R = Reopening

* The June two and five-year note auctions settle on July 2. As a result, that borrowing is counted as part of the July-September 

quarter's net cash raised. The March two and five-year auctions settled in April and thereby are part of this quarter's cash flow.
### E m a ili ng : 2007 . b mp R a l ph D e S i ena to: C l e v e l and Ho ll aday 11 / 10 / 2011 04 : 57PM 1 atta c hment 2007 . b mp

2007 Met
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00052- CR Reginald T im othy P rince, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 264 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 685 43, H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Reg inald Timothy Prince seeks to appea l a judgme nt of conviction for eng ag ing in org anized criminal activity
. The trial court has cer tified that this is a plea barg ain case and Prince has no rig ht to appea l. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a) (2), (d). Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appea l for wa

nt of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Justices Puryear , Pemberton, and H enson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Oc tober 3, 2012 Do Not Publish
#### NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and Microsoft Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and Sun Microsystems, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, and America Online, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. Allan M. KONRAD, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant.

No. 01-1455.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 2, 2002.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A petition for rehearing having been filed by the APPELLANT,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

The mandate of the court will issue on August 9, 2002.
#### John Anthony BARKOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-769.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61557-61558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30403]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of November 17, 24, December 1 and 8, 1997.

PLACE: Comissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of November 17

Friday, November 21

11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting). A. Final Rule--
Deliberate Misconduct by Unlicensed Persons (Tentative) (Contact: Ken 
Hart, 301-415-1659)

Week of November 24--Tentative

    There are no meetings the week of November 24.

Week of December 1--Tentative

    There are no meetings the week of December 1.

Week of December 8--Tentative

Thursday, December 11

2:00 p.m.  Briefing on Investigative Matters (Closed--Ex. 5 & 7)
3:00 p.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

Friday, December 12

9:00 a.m.  Meeting with Northeast Nuclear on Millstone (Public Meeting) 
(Contact: Bill Travers, 301-415-1200)

    The schedule for commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1661).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0d7cdc8e0ced2c38ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7b0aaaf87a9b5a4e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1d5dac6f1dfc3d29fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5a1aeb285abb7a6eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 61558]]


    Dated: November 14, 1997.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
Secy Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30403 Filed 11-14-97; 2:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Marie J. WALKER, Petitioner, v. Rivers M. ANDERSON, Chairman, et al., Respondents.

No. 73-452.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
| 1.     | Such Annual Report of Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Resume In Minutes, Inc. |

| Date: March 31, 2011                                                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                |
| By: /s/ Novaira Haider                                                                              |
| Novaira HaiderChief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)Director |
EXHIBIT 11.2

<TABLE>

CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED
(in thousands of dollars or shares except per share amounts)
Forty Weeks Ended November 13, 1999 and November 14, 1998

<CAPTION>
                                            Forty Weeks Ended
                                         ----------------------
                                           Nov. 13,    Nov. 14,
                                           1999        1998
                                          ---------   ---------
<S>                                       <C>         <C>
Diluted:
  Net earnings (loss) applicable to
    common shares                         $ (4,229)   $  6,932
                                          =========   =========
Shares:
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding               17,777      17,624
  Shares issuable under employee
    stock plans - weighted average               -**        37
  Dilutive effect of exercise of
    certain stock options                        -**       246
  Less: Treasury stock-weighted average     (7,897)     (7,661)
                                          ---------   ---------
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding     9,880      10,246
                                          =========   =========
Net earnings (loss) per common and
    common equivalent shares              $  (0.43)   $   0.68
                                          =========   =========

<FN>
** The dilutive effect of stock options in the amount of
   336,687 shares and 36,853 shares issuable under employee
   stock plans were not considered as the effect is
   antidilutive.
</FN>
</TABLE>




                              42
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28,2009 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| *   May 7, 2009* |   | By:                       | */s/Peter M. Folger* |
|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|----------------------|
| Date                            |   | Peter M. Folger           |
|                            |   | Senior Vice President and |
|                            |   | Chief Financial Officer   |
|                            |   |                      |

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shallit be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
#### In the Matter of DETENTION OF JUVENILES.

No. 74-245.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 25, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Emery J. Newell, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62062-62063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30484]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food And Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97F-0469]

General Electric Co.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that 
General Electric Co. has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to provide for the expanded safe use of 
phosphorous acid, cyclic butylethyl propanediol, 2,4,6-tri-tert-
butylphenyl ester, which may contain up to 1 percent by weight of 
triisopropanolamine, as an antioxidant and/or stabilizer in high 
density polyethylene and high density olefin copolymers intended for 
use in contact with food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vir D. Anand, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-216), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3081.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act

[[Page 62063]]

(sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 8B4567) has been filed by General Electric Co., 
One Lexan Lane, Mt. Vernon, IN 47620-9364. The petition proposes to 
amend the food additive regulations in Sec. 178.2010 Antioxidants and/
or stabilizers for polymers (21 CFR 178.2010) to provide for the 
expanded safe use of phosphorous acid, cyclic butylethyl propanediol, 
2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenyl ester, which may contain up to 1 percent by 
weight of triisopropanolamine, as an antioxidant and/or stabilizer in 
high density polyethylene and high density olefin copolymers intended 
for use in contact with food.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(i) that this action is 
of the type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

    Dated: November 3, 1997.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 97-30484 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Oct - Dec

2019 Actual 313 330 7 337 24 404 0

Jan - Mar

2020 Actual 365 477 (1) 476 111 515 0

Apr - Jun

2020 Actual 1,526 2,753 (20) 2,733 1207 1722 0

Jul - Sep

2020 Actual 401 454 7 461 60 1782 0

Oct - Dec

2020 Actual 648 597 (3) 595 (53) 1729 0

Jan - Mar

2021 Actual 1008 401 1 402 607 1122 0

Apr - Jun

2021 Actual 591 319 2 321 (270) 852 0

Jul - Sep

2021 Actual 751 103 11 115 (637) 215 0

Oct - Dec

2021 Actual 480 689 (18) 670 191 406 0

Jan - Mar

2022 Actual 423 668 1 669 245 652 0

Apr - Jun

2022 Actual (180) 7 (55) (49) 131 782 (30)

Jul - Sep

2022 Actual 453 457 (151) 307 (146) 636 (120)

Oct - Dec

2022 Actual 368 373 (194) 179 (189) 447 (139)

Jan - Mar

2023 Actual 656 657 (270) 387 (269) 178 (221)

Apr - Jun

2023 Actual 181 657 (251) 406 225 402 (180)

Jul - Sep

2023 Actual 520 1010 (235) 775 254 657 (158)

Oct - Dec October 31, 2023 407 776 (276) 500 93 750 (171)

2023 Actual 402 776 (262) 514 112 769 (171)

Forecast Revisions (5) (0) 14 13 19 19 0

Jan - Mar October 31, 2023 548 816 (268) 548 0 750 (172)

2024 January 29, 2024 522 760 (257) 504 (19) 750 (172)

Forecast Revisions (25) (55) 11 (44) (19) 0 0

Apr - Jun

2024 January 29, 2024 (71) 202 (273) (71) (0) 750 (197)

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
Statement of G7 Finance Ministers  

and Central Bank Governors October 3, 2009, Istanbul, Turkey 

We, the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, met today to discuss economic and 

financial developments and policy priorities. We have taken decisive and concerted actions to 

restore financial stability and provide significant economic stimulus. In recent months we have 

started to see signs of a global economic recovery and continued improvement in financial 

market conditions. However, there is no room for complacency since the prospects for growth 

remain fragile and labor market conditions are not yet improving. We will keep in place our 

support measures until recovery is assured.  

We reaffirm our shared interest in a strong and stable international financial system. Excess 

volatility and disorderly movements in exchange rates have adverse implications for economic 

and financial stability. We continue to monitor exchange markets closely, and cooperate as 

appropriate. We welcome China’s continued commitment to move to a more flexible exchange 

rate, which should lead to continued appreciation of the Renminbi in effective terms and help 

promote more balanced growth in China and in the world economy. 

We reviewed the progress made on delivering G7 action plans and our commitments agreed in 

the G20 in Pittsburgh. 

 

 

 


EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>

CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
(in thousands of dollars except per share amounts)
Twelve Weeks Ended July 19, 1997 and July 20, 1996

<CAPTION>
                                          Twelve Weeks Ended    
                                         ---------------------  
                                          July 19,     July 20, 
                                            1997         1996   
                                         ---------    --------- 
<S>                                      <C>          <C>       
Primary:

  Net earnings (loss) applicable
    to common shares                     $  1,385     $   (813)
                                         =========    ========= 

Shares (in thousands of shares): 
  
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding              17,335       17,222  

  Shares issuable under employee
    stock plans - weighted average             31           38  

  Dilutive effect of exercise of
    certain stock options                     128           44  

  Less:  Treasury stock - weighted
    average                                (5,573)      (3,303) 
                                         ---------    --------- 
  Weighted average number of common
    and common equivalent shares
    outstanding                            11,921       14,001  
                                         =========    ========= 
Net earnings (loss) per common and
    common equivalent shares             $   0.12     $  (0.06)
                                         =========    ========= 
</TABLE>





                             29
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of STR Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to my
knowledge:



Date: March 19, 2010

/s/ DENNIS L. JILOTName:

Dennis L. JilotTitle:

Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### Florence MAYSLES, Petitioner, v. Dr. Howard MAY et al., Respondents.

No. 40540.

Supremo Court of Florida.

July 8, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 3, 1971.

L. Barry Keyfetz, of Ser & Keyfetz, Miami, for petitioner.

Summers Warden, Coral Gables, Patrick H. Mears, and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

DEKLE, Justice.

There has been no final hearing in this workmen’s compensation case. The two sides seem to have been “jockeying for position” in the presentation of their cases before the Judge of Industrial Claims. Just five days prior to scheduled final hearing, respondent-employer moved for a second compulsory physical, which was granted, but petitioner-claimant’s attorney says that he never did receive a copy of such order, so that upon appearing at the hearing he was taken by surprise and stated that he was prepared to proceed, although it would be prejudicial to have a subsequent further physical examination of his client prior to the employer putting on his case thereafter. According to the employer’s version, claimant’s counsel refused to go forward at the time of the hearing.

Employer’s motion to dismiss was granted without any testimony or evidence being *252presented. Thereafter the Claims Judge vacated his earlier order requiring the second physical examination by claimant and entered a formal order of dismissal, invoking the appellate process.

Upon this state of the record, the Full Commission denied the review and stated that “the findings of fact of the Judge of Industrial Claims were supported by competent substantial evidence.” This is hardly possible when there had been no hearing upon which “findings” could be based.

The tactical moves outlined apparently precipitated a dismissal of the cause. A new date should have been set under the circumstances and the cause heard.

Certiorari is accordingly granted; the order and decision of the Industrial Relations Commission is quashed; and the cause is remanded to the Judge of Industrial Claims for hearing and entry of his findings and order thereon.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1











INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Shell Company Report of Prime Acquisition Corp. (a
development stage company) on Form 20-F Amendment #3 (file No. 001-35105) of our report dated April 30, 2013, with respect to
our audit of the financial statements of Prime Acquisition Corp. as of December 31, 2012, for the year ended December 31, 2012
and for the cumulative period from February 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2012, the financial statements for the period
from February 4, 2010 (inception) through December 31, 2011 were audited by other auditors, appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Prime Acquisition Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2012. We also consent to the reference to our firm under
the heading "Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers--Auditors" in the report.





/s/Marcum
Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP



Marcum Bernstein
& Pinchuk LLP

New York, New York

February
27, 2014
#### Leslie Isben ROGGE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 01-3377.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 22, 2002.

Filed Aug. 27, 2002.

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Isben Rogge appeals the District Court’s1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which he filed in 2001, more than three years after his conviction became final. On appeal, Rogge argues the District Court erred in finding his § 2255 motion was successive and unauthorized because his prior filing was found to be a mislabeled 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He argues he is entitled to relief on his motion because a defect in the indictment deprived the District Court of federal jurisdiction, and his trial counsel was ineffective.

We need not reach the more complicated issue of successiveness because the record plainly demonstrates that Rogge’s motion was filed well beyond the one-year limitations period, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2255, with no applicable exception, *see United States v. Cotton,*— U.S. -, -, 122 S.Ct. 1781, 1785, 152 L.Ed.2d 860 (2002) (“[Defects in an indictment do not deprive a court of its power to adjudicate a case.”).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment dismissing Rogge’s motion.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.