alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             769
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                        31
<INVENTORY>                                     24,932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,754
<PP&E>                                          23,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,516
<BONDS>                                         20,053
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,033
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,454
<SALES>                                         28,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,724
<CGS>                                           17,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                       829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,194
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
#### STEWART BROADCASTING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Charles A. Stewart, Appellants, v. Kent S. McKINLEY et al., Appellees.

No. 72-725.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 9, 1972.

Appeal quashed.
FOR RELEASE AT 3:00 P.M. 

August 2, 1993 

Contact: Michelle Smith 

(202) 622-2960 

TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET BORROWING ESTIMATES 

The Treasury Department on Monday announced that its net market borrowing for the 

July-September 1993 quarter is estimated to be $58.3 billion, with a $40 billion cash balance 

on September 30. The Treasury also announced that its net market borrowing for the 

October-December 1993 quarter is estimated to be in a range of $95 billion to $100 billion, 

with a $35 billion cash balance at the end of December. 

In the quarterly announcement of its borrowing needs on May 3, 1993, the Treasury 

estimated net market borrowing during the July-September 1993 quarter to be in a range of 

$90 billion to $95 billion, assuming a $40 billion cash balance on September 30. The 

current lower borrowing estimate largely reflects the carry-over of a higher-than-expected 

cash balance at the end of June and lower outlays in the July-September period, particularly 

for the Resolution Trust Corporation. 

Actual market borrowing in the quarter ended June 30, 1993, was $53.5 billion, while 

the end-of-quarter cash balance was $60.6 billion. On May 3, the Treasury had estimated 

market borrowing for the April-June quarter to be $37.0 billion, with a $35 billion cash 

balance on June 30. The increase in market borrowing and a lower cash deficit accounted 

for the increase in the cash balance. 

-30-
#### Billy Ray SMITH, Appellant, v. Clarence Eugene JOHNSON and Publix Super Markets, Inc., Appellees.

No. 72-49.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 14, 1973.

Dan H. Honeywell, of Billings, Frederick, Wooten & Honeywell, Orlando, for appellant.

David J. Williams, of Langston & Massey, Lakeland, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sims v. Apperson Chemicals, Inc., Fla.App. 1st 1966, 185 So.2d 179; Restatement (Second), Torts § 314 (1965); 2 Harper and James, Torts §§ 18.1, 18.2, 18.6, 18.7 (1956). Cf. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Garland, Fla.App.1st 1972, 269 So.2d 708; Lydick v. Chance, Fla.App.2d 1968, 214 So.2d 885; Tuloma Gas Products Company v. Lehmberg, Tex.Civ.App. 1968, 430 S.W.2d 281.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

MANN, Chief Judge.

The petition for rehearing, which looks like a precursor of what we would judge an ill-founded petition to the Supreme Court for conflict certiorari, prompts us to add this simple explanation of the cases with which we are allegedly in conflict.

In Booth v. Mary Carter Paint Co., Fla.App.2d 1966, 182 So.2d 292, there was sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of Mary Carter Paint Company’s driver, who stopped *first*on the pavement, arguably causing to stop the vehicle into which the plaintiff’s decedent crashed. A summary judgment for Mary Carter Paint Company was properly reversed.

In Lydick v. Chance, Fla.App.2d 1968, 214 So.2d 885, a jury verdict was upheld on evidence that a car was left in a dangerous situation when it should have been moved. There we distinguished Sims v. Apperson Chemicals, Inc., Fla.App.1st 1966, 185 So.2d 179, which governs this case. In *Sims*and the case before us there is no evidence of causation. Here, Johnson, driving Publix’ truck, did not have anything to do with the accident. Smith, driving south on U.S. 98, hit a horse in the road which had been struck by a man named Massey, whose truck was stopped in the road when Johnson came along, *179northbound, and necessarily stopped behind Massey. The fact that Smith’s vehicle, after hitting the horse, hit the Pub-lix truck operated by Johnson is purely fortuitous. There is no showing of negligence on Johnson’s part, and no evidence of his conduct as a cause of the injury. Smith’s action properly proceeds against Dykas, who owned the horse, and Massey, who struck it, and Massey’s employer. It was properly terminated against Johnson and his employer.

Rehearing denied.

LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Richard BIRNBAUM, Appellant, v. Elsie AARONS, Appellee.

No. 76-1097.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 29, 1977.

Richard Michael Birnbaum, in pro per.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. *See State v. Taylor,*145 So.2d 751 (Fla.2d DCA 1962). The cause is remanded with directions to transfer the case to the County Court of Broward County for further proceedings.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

MAGER, C. J., concurs in conclusion only.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,953,435              11,625,107
<SECURITIES>                                69,264,966              37,110,776
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,670,771              17,642,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,302,509               2,269,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,295,981              34,364,617
<PP&E>                                     248,714,261             206,159,583
<DEPRECIATION>                             112,059,627             100,260,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             273,097,704             212,596,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,220,488              25,644,073
<BONDS>                                     33,000,000              20,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          112,500                 125,000
<PREFERRED>                                    397,000                 400,400
<COMMON>                                    42,270,297              39,458,340
<OTHER-SE>                                 132,675,784              96,881,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               273,097,704             212,596,619
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,810,155              51,433,818
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,305,854              40,550,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (8,893,488)            (12,401,892)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,405,175               1,335,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,992,614              21,949,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,822,943               8,937,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,169,671              13,012,849
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,169,671              13,012,849
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.54                    0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54                    0.69



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-85173) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-72949) on Form S-8 of CIB Marine
Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December
31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.

                                                                   /s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 2000
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     CPC INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
($ Millions)                            FOR THE SIX
                                        MONTHS ENDED                  FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                        JUNE 30, 1997 *     1996        1995        1994         1993       1992
                                        --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>               <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES                    $  196.5    $  917.1    $  877.0    $  614.7    $  790.3    $  744.5
--------------------------              --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add (subtract):
    Portion of rents representative
         of interest                              17.0        34.3        26.3        25.3        20.9        21.7

    Interest on bonds, mortgages
         & similar debt                           34.6        74.2        55.2        51.9        56.1        64.7
    Other interest                                43.9       131.8        86.5        54.6        53.7        51.0
    Interest expense included in
         cost of plant construction               (1.6)      (12.9)       (6.6)       (6.2)       (6.7)       (6.4)
    Income of unconsolidated
         venture                                  --          --          --           3.9        --           5.4
                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income as adjusted                            $  290.4    $1,144.5    $1,038.4    $  744.2    $  914.3    $  880.9
                                  ================================================================================

FIXED CHARGES:
--------------
    Portion of rents representative
         of interest                          $   17.0     $  34.3    $   26.3    $   25.3    $   20.9    $   21.7

    Interest on bonds, mortgages
         & similar debt                           34.6        74.2        55.2        51.9        56.1        64.7

    Other interest                                43.9       131.8        86.5        54.6        53.7        51.0
                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              $   95.5     $ 240.3    $  168.0    $  131.8    $  130.7    $  137.4
                                  ================================================================================
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
--------------------
    FIXED CHARGES                                  3.0         4.8         6.2         5.6         7.0         6.4
    -------------                ==================================================================================
               
</TABLE>




* Excludes results of discontinued operations.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the “Company”) on Form  10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











May 7, 2010








/s/ Roger S. Marcus


Roger S. Marcus


Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT****TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT****TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December31, 2006 (the “Report”) by Cash Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”), I, Andrew Cashin, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.         By:                                             /s/ Andrew Cashin    Andrew Cashin    Chief Financial Officer   Dated: May 14, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree with ASARCO in United 
States v. Trinity Industries, Inc., et al., No. 97-2598-EEO, was lodged 
on November 24, 1997, with the United States District Court for the 
District of Kansas.
    In this action the United States sought the recovery of response 
costs it incurred at the Kansas City Structural Steel Site in Kansas 
City, Kansas. The Consent Decree provides that ASARCO will pay to the 
United States $318,212 of approximately $450,000 in outstanding costs.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Trinty Industries, Inc., et al., DOJ Ref. #90-11-2-
789B.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 500 State Avenue, Suite 360, Kansas City, 
Kansas 66101; the Region 7 office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101; and at the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy 
refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $4.00 
(25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 97-32907 Filed 12-16-7; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Template for certification accompanying Declaration: 

Pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 802.402(d), I hereby certify that I am [“the Chief Executive Officer” or

“a duly authorized designee, as defined at 31 C.F.R. § 802.202(b),”] of [the submitting 

party], which is submitting the foregoing Declaration, and that, to the best of my knowledge and 

belief subject to the penalties provided in section 1001 of Title 18, United States Code: 

1. The foregoing Declaration fully complies with the requirements of Section 721 of the

Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, 31 C.F.R. Part 802, and [any agreement or

condition entered into with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United

States (the “Committee”) or any member agency of the Committee acting on its

behalf]; and [Note: A submitting party that is not subject to an applicable agreement

or condition may omit the inapplicable term.]

2. The foregoing Declaration, as it relates to the transaction, the real estate, [the submitting 

party], and [the submitting party’s] parents, affiliates, and any other related entities 

described in the Declaration, is accurate and complete in all material respects. [Note: A 

submitting party that does not have parents, affiliates, and/or subsidiaries, may omit 

the inapplicable term(s).]

Signature: 

__________________________ [include printed name of signer] 

Title: 

__________________________ 

Submitter: 

__________________________ [identify the party to the transaction on whose behalf the 

individual above has signed the certification] 

Date: 

__________________________
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2584 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow for twelve associate justices 

of the Supreme Court of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2021 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mr. NADLER, and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow for twelve 

associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Judiciary Act of 

5 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NUMBER OF JUSTICES; QUORUM. 

7 Section 1 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘a Chief Justice of the United States and eight 

9 associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a 

10 quorum’’ and inserting ‘‘a Chief Justice of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2584 IH

1 States and twelve associate justices, any eight of whom 

2 shall constitute a quorum’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
254 La. 767

#### Joseph A. CONINO, Individually and on behalf of his minor son, Joseph A. Conino, Jr. v. Alvin P. LANDRY, Southeastern Fire Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company. DeWitt Clinton McNUTT, II, Individually and on behalf of his minor son, DeWitt Clinton McNutt, 111 v. Alvin P. LANDRY and Southeastern Fire Insurance Company.

No. 49962.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Alvin P. Landry and Southeastern Fire Insurance Company applying for certi-orari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 222 So.2d 525.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
#### Curtis ROUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-534.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 4, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Lynn CRIDER et al., Appellants, v. James R. RAINWATER, County Judge, Appellee.

No. 73-1077.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc., (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 10-Q Report), that:

(1) the 10-Q Report fully complies with
the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the
10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of November 13, 2006.



/s/ James R. RiedmanJames R. RiedmanChief Executive Officer/s/ Kenneth E. WolfKenneth E. WolfChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.