alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bridgeport Ventures
Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies that
to the best of such officers knowledge:

|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: July 18, 2012

By: /s/ Carmelo
Marrelli       Carmelo
Marrelli       Chief Financial
Officer        (principal financial
officer)

---
Order entered March 1, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00665

- CV

UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellant

V.

PAMELA EVANS, PATRIC E ANDERSON, AS NEXT F RIEND OF PARIS DAVIS , &

LEATHA KATAVI JONES, AS NEXT FRIEND OF D OMINIC JONES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 04449



### O RDER

Befor e the Court is appellant’s February 28, 2019 second unopposed motion to extend

time to file reply brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than

March 20, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officerof Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 25, 2005to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| *August 2, 2005* | * * |                      | By: | */s/Robert P. Story, Jr.* |   |
|-----------------------|----------|---------------------------|-----|---------------------------|--------|
| Date                  |     | Robert P. Story, Jr.      |
|                  |     | Senior Vice President and |
|                  |     | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000315256
<NAME>PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                1,668,405
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 27,454
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                     313,615
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   688,143
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,697,617
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  424,364
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                        231,498
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             655,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       50,000
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       516,485
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          10,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                   25,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                724,318
<LEASES-CURRENT>                           135,255
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             580,696
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>            2,697,617
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  799,143
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                        60,913
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 646,511
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 700,534
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     98,609
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          11,019
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>             102,738
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    34,454
<NET-INCOME>                                68,284
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  7,287
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               60,997
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                     168,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        




</TABLE>
#### AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Patricia Ann JOHNSON, Respondent.

No. 44027.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1973.

Certiorari denied..

ROBERTS, Acting- C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 21: SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES    INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES      STATE/JURISDICTION OF
                                                                                 INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                      <C>                                               <C>
CIB Marine Bancshares,                                                     Wisconsin Corporation
Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Central Illinois Bank                             Illinois Commercial Bank
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Hillside Investors, LTD                           Illinois Corporation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  CIB Bank                 Illinois Commercial Bank
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         CIB Bank                                          Indiana Commercial Bank
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         First Ozaukee Capital                             Wisconsin Corporation
                         Corp.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Marine Bank              Wisconsin Commercial Bank
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Marine Bank                                       Federal Savings Bank
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         C.I.B. Data Processing                            Illinois Corporation
                         Services, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Mortgage Services, Inc.                           Illinois Corporation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Marine Trust and                                  Illinois Corporation
                         Investment Company
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         CIB Marine Capital                                Delaware Business Trust
                         Trust I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DONALD F. SCHWARZ, MD, MPH 

Municipal Services Building Deputy Mayor, Health & Opportunity 

Health Commissioner 1401 JFK Boulevard, Room 600 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 

Tel: (215) 686-9009 

April 9, 2010 

Shawn M. Garvin
 

Regional Administrator
 

United States Environmental Protection Agency
 

Region III
 

Mail Code 3RAOO
 

1650 Arch Street
 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

During the 2009 Ozone Season, the failure of an exhaust fan pump resulted in significant 

downtime for the ozone monitor located at Northeast Airport in Philadelphia County (AQS 

Monitor ill 42-101-0024). The downtime lasted from 9/16/2009 - 10/2612009 (42 days) and 

resulted in 71 % data collection during the ozone season. Section 2.3(b) of Appendix I to 40 

CFR Part 50 requires three consecutive years of data with data availability of at least 90% on 

average, with a minimum data completeness in anyone year of at least 75%. Furthermore, 

this section also states: 

" ... When computing whether the minimum data completeness requirements have 

been met, meteorological or ambient data may bc sufficient to demonstrate that 

meteorological conditions on missing days were not conducive to concentrations 

above the level of the standard. Missing days assumed less than the level ofthe 

standard are counted for the purpose of meeting the data completeness requirement, 

subject to the approval of the appropriate Regional Administrator." 

The City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health, Air Management Services (AMS), is 

therefore submitting a data substitution request to approve the null data code, "BG", for all 

missing days that AMS is proposing to have counted towards meeting the data completeness 

requirements. Based on analysis of meteorological and ambient monitoring data, AMS has 

determined usc of the null data code, "BG", is appropriate for the following 29 days: 
Dates Day Count 

9/16/09 - 9/1 7/09 2 

9/19/09 1 

9/26/09 1 

9/29/09 - 10/2/09 4 

10/4/09 - 10/8/09 5 

10/11/09 - 10/26/09 16 

TOTAL 29 

AMS has contacted Andrew Hass of EPA Region III, who has reviewed and commented on 

the methodology. 

The data substitution analysis and correspondence with Andrew Hass is attached. 

If you have any questions, please contact Thomas Huynh at 215-685-7584 or 

thomas.huynh@phila.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

cc:	 Pauline DeVose, EPA Region III 

David Lutz, Data Certification Contact, US EP (D304-06) 

Walter Wilkie, EPA Region III 

Thomas Huynh, Director, Air Management Services 

Ed Braun, Regulatory Services Manager, Air Management Services 

Henry Kim, Chief, Program Services, Air Management Services 

!<jrit Dalal, PADEP Division of Air Quality Monitoring 

Arleen Shuman, PADEP Division of Resources Management
No. 00-7573.

#### Echevarria *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00289-CV

LEGEND OAKS-SOUTH SAN ANTONIO, LLC d/b/a Legend Oaks Healthcare and 

Rehabilitation Center—South San Antonio,

Appellant

v.

Emma MOLINA on Behalf of the Estate of Adella Rocamontes,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-17554

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s April 24, 2014, 

amended order overruling objections to the expert report and denying the motion to dismiss is 

AFFIRMED. 

We ORDER that appellee Emma Molina on Behalf of the Estate of Adella Rocamontes

recover her costs of this appeal from appellant Legend Oaks—South San Antonio, LLC d/b/a 

Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center—South San Antonio.

SIGNED February 18, 2015.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             689
<SECURITIES>                                       529
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,566
<INVENTORY>                                         38
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                     399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                         3,900
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,346
<SALES>                                            608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,707
<CGS>                                              822
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   927
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (873)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Robert S. Benou Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company and Marc Benou, the Chief Operating Officer, President and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.  

 

 

| Dated: December 15, 2006 | /s/ Robert Benou                                                                                      |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Name:  Robert Benou

Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                     |  

                                                                                         |
| Dated: December 15, 2006 | /s/ Marc Benou                                                                                        |
|                     | Name:  Marc Benou

Title:  Chief Operating Officer, President and Secretary                           |

                

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
#### Doris I. LUNT v. C. Prescott LUNT.

No. 38207.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So.2d 270.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EARL BRADDY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1209

[July 5, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 00-020675-CF-10A (FF).

Earl Braddy, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### M. S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-635.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*884Before PEARSON, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Wilson v. State,*304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974); *Tiller v. State,*330 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *Von Horn v. State,*334 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976); *Brown v. State,*355 So.2d 138 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1978).
#### Roosevelt GREEN, Petitioner, v. BROWARD GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER and Dr. C. L. Reid, Respondents.

No. 78-202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 21, 1978.

Linda Koenigsberg of Cohen & Kokus, Miami, for petitioner.

Carey M. Fischer of Ferrero, Middle-brooks & Strickland, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent-Dr. C. L. Reid.

Ellen Mills Gibbs, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent-Broward General Medical Center.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The issue raised by this Petition for Writ of Certiorari is whether the jurisdiction of a medical mediation panel terminates if a hearing is not held within 120 days from the date the claim was filed with the clerk and if no order extending the time of the hearing has been entered within that same 120 day period.1 Certiorari is granted.

We find it unnecessary to reach this’ issue because the record shows that no hearing on the claim was held within six months of the date the claim was filed as mandated by Section 768.44(3), Florida Statutes (1976 Supp.).2 Since the medical mediation procedure enacted by Part II, Chapter 768 is in derogation of the common law, and is an impediment to the constitutional guarantee of access to the courts of this state, strict compliance with the statutory provisions of Chapter 768 is required. *Carter*v. *Sparkman,*335 So.2d 802 (Fla.1976); *Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Badia,*348 So.2d 631 (Fla. 3 DCA 1977).

*878No hearing on the claim having been held within six months from the date the claim was filed, Petitioner is now entitled to pursue his cause of action in the circuit court without further delay. But see, *State ex rel. Love v. Jacobson,*343 So.2d 1328 (Fla. 3 DCA 1977).

The order extending the jurisdiction of the medical mediation panel to hold a hearing on the claim more than six months after the claim was filed is quashed and the cause remanded to the medical mediation panel with directions to enter a certificate of termination of jurisdiction.

QUASHED AND REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and MOORE, J., concur.

1

. Petitioner filed his claim prior to the effective date of the new Florida Rules of Medical Mediation Procedure.

2

. “The hearing shall be held within 120 days of the date the claim was filed with the clerk unless, for good cause shown upon order of the judicial referee, such time is extended. Such extension shall not exceed 6 months from the date the claim is filed. If no hearing on the merits is held within 10 months of the date the claim is filed, the jurisdiction of the mediation panel on the subject matter shall terminate, and the parties may proceed in accordance with law.” F.S. 768.44(3).
#### HOLIDAY ISLE, INC., Appellant, v. S. D. B. INC., Appellee.

No. 69-864.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MICHAEL CLOWARD,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 883 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,174<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,899
<PP&E>                                          14,694<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,688
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           663
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,181
<SALES>                                         66,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,694
<CGS>                                           50,387<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                       948
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,841
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance for doubtful accounts
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation
<F3>Exclusive of depreciation and depletion
</FN>
        

</TABLE>