alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,461
<PP&E>                                           3,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,604
<BONDS>                                          1,676
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        185
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,338
<SALES>                                          2,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            1,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    196
<INCOME-TAX>                                        71
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                118
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (9)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<FN>
<F1>The amounts presented for earnings per share data comply with the
requirements of SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share."
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**
**EXHIBIT 23**

March 11, 2022 

Ms. Stacey Hollabaugh 

XTO Energy Inc. 

22777 Springwoods Village Parkway 

Spring, TX 77389-1425 

 
  Re:  HGT Consent Letter
Dear Ms. Hollabaugh: 

This letter is to confirmthat Miller and Lents, Ltd. (M&L) authorizes XTO Energy Inc. (XTO) to use our name and report dated January 21, 2022, related to the Hugoton Royalty Trust (HGT) for use in the electronic filing of the HGT Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC. 

Please provide us with an exact copy of the Annual Report on form 10-Kas electronically filed with the SEC. 

 
Very truly yours,MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.Texas Registered Engineering Firm No. F-1442By 
/S/ JENNIFER A. GODBOLD
 
Jennifer A. Godbold, P. E.
 Senior Vice President**
NUMBER 13-20-00457-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

JAMES BROWN AND 

EARLINE DAVIS-BROWN, Appellants,

v.

JERROD WAYNE PILLANS, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 13th District Court 

of Navarro County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

This matter is before the Court on the appellants’ failure to file a brief or reasonably 

explain the failure to do so.1 On February 17, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified 

1 This case was transferred from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco to this Court pursuant to a 

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
2

appellants that their brief did not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

9.4(i)(3), 38.1(b), (d), (g), and (k), and the brief was therefore marked received rather than 

filed on February 12, 2021. The Clerk requested that appellants submit an amended brief 

within ten days from the date of the notice. Additionally, in consideration of the withdrawal 

of appellants’ attorney, on February 26, 2021, this court ordered appellants’ brief due 

March 1, 2021. The notice warned that if the brief was not timely filed, the appeal was 

subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of the notice, appellants reasonably 

explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants’

failure to timely file a brief. Appellants have not responded to this notice and have failed 

to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time 

to file a brief, or file a brief.

Moreover, on March 3, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants, in 

accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $205.00 filing fee was paid within ten days of the letter. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellants have not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the 

$205.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 38.8(a), 

42.3(b). 

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

25th day of March, 2021.
#### James Thomas CARY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43191.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 5, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 269 So.2d 374.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
OFFI C E O F TH E G OVE RNOR COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS STA TE HOU SE

. B OSTO N, MA 02133 (617) 725-4000
DEVALL. PATRICK GOVERNOR

December 10, 2014 Curt Spalding Regional Administrator EPA New England 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston , MA 021 09-3912 Dear Mr

. Spalding: I write to you to request that the United States Environmental Protection Agency nominate the BJAT LLC Site , located at 300 Fisher Street in Franklin , Massachusetts, for inclusion on the National Priorities List of Superfund sites

. The serious nature of the contamination at th is site warrants its inclusion on the National Priorities List. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has been working with the Town of Franklin and state and federal representatives to help them understand the site and the benefits of adding the BJAT LLC Site to the National Priorities List. The Town of Franklin , which is impacted by contamination from the site, supports this action. We have had close cooperation with US EPA staff in this effort, and look forward to continuing this coordinated effort to clean up this site. Thank you for your consideration of this request.Mr

. Cur t Spalding December 10, 20 14 Page 2 

### cc: James 

### T. Owens Ill, Director Office of Site Remediation and Restoration EPA New England Maeve Vallely Bartlett, Secretary Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs David W

. Cash, Commissioner Department of Environmental Protection Jeffrey D

. Nutting, Administrator Town of Franklin
|    |                                                                                                                         |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 of Escalon Medical Corp. |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |
| Date: October 26, 2018 | /s/    Richard J. DePiano, Jr. |
|                   | Richard J. DePiano, Jr. |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |   |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 24.4


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 10-k
of out report dated February 7, 1995, on our audits of the financial statements
of Health Care microsystems, Inc. as of and for the years ended December 31,
1994 and 1993, included in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No.
333-13513) in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 33-91518 and
333-06769) and in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-65560,
33-76638, 33-76770, 33-95326 and 33-33706) of Health Management Systems, Inc.

/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. 
----------------------------
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. 


Los Angeles, California
January 14, 1997
#### Douglas Franklin WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., HENDRY, J., and DREW, E. HARRIS (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, was charged with and convicted of first degree murder, assault with intent to commit murder, and breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit petit larceny. He appeals his convictions and sentences. We affirm.

Appellant has raised three points on appeal. The first two points claim that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress various statements made by him, both prior to and after his arrest in that said statements were made (1) involuntarily, (2) pursuant to illegal detention by the police and (3) without the benefit of proper *Miranda*warnings. The third point claims error on the part of the trial judge in restricting a psychologist-defense witness from testifying as to certain self-serving facts elicited from appellant during examination which formed a partial basis for the psychologist’s expert opinion as to the vol-untariness of appellant’s statements and confession given to the police during interrogation.

After carefully reviewing the record, briefs and argument of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law, it is our opinion that appellant’s contentions are without merit and that his convictions and sentences must be affirmed.

Affirmed.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    |   /s/ Peng Zhang                                       |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |  Peng Zhang                                                 |   |
|   |   |  Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |   |

----
United States Position

IFC Proposed Financing of 

the STG Cement Project in Myanmar

July 31, 2017

The United States wishes to thank IFC staff for the time they spent answering many questions on 

this project. Myanmar is at a critical stage of its economic and political development. The 

United States recognizes that the IFC has an important role to play to catalyze private sector 

investment in the country, and it strongly supports IFC engagement in Myanmar.

The United States also recognizes that this project offers both financial and development 

additionality. However, the United States has significant concerns about the environmental due 

diligence, which U.S. subject matter experts assessed especially carefully in light of the unique 

characteristics of the ecosystem where the STG cement plant and its limestone quarry and coal 

mine are located and the prevalence of wildlife trafficking and illegal logging in the area. 

Because of the unique biodiversity of these surroundings, this statement focuses primarily on 

biodiversity risks of this project, but this was only one of several factors.

The United States’ review of the environmental and social impact assessment report and 

supporting documents revealed gaps in baseline data for rare and endangered species as well as 

insufficient analysis and mitigation plans to address environmental impacts. In addition, the 

United States believes the plans for addressing impacts to critical and natural habitats (e.g., the 

biodiversity action plan) should have been more robustly developed. The risks associated with 

the use of offsets to mitigate impacts to critical habitat are high and require a commensurately 

high level of data quality, analysis, planning, and commitment. In light of capacity constraints, 

the project should have included designated financing and assistance to improve technical 

capacity and governance in the relevant government institutions. Absent this, the United States 

is not confident that the project ensures against a net loss, or ideally allows for net gains for 

biodiversity. In addition, the United States believes the project should have included emissions 

data for the coal mine and additional air quality data, without which it will be impossible to 

effectively assess the project’s impact.

For these reasons, consistent with provisions of U.S. law pertaining to the review of Multilateral 

Development Bank proposals, the United States requests to be recorded as voting no on the 

project proposal.

The United States would also like to reiterate its support for the economic and political reforms

in Myanmar, as well as its demonstrated commitment to environmentally sustainable 

development. The U.S. position on this project is a reflection of the importance it places on

adequate data collection and project preparation in advance of presentation of proposals for IFC 

Board consideration in all countries. The U.S. commitment to Myanmar’s development, both 

through bilateral assistance and engagement with multilateral resources like the IFC, remains 

steadfast.
S10-I0()S24-()()I 

VIRGINIA 

NATIONAL 

BANK 

c i j •••••! 

August 13,2010 uj ^Q ^ 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New jersey Ave, SP. 

Washington. DC 20590 

RE: U.S. DOT Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport 

Charlotlcsvillc, VA 

Dear Mr. LaHood: 

I am pleased to submit tliis letter of support on behalf of the Charlottesville-Albemarle 

Airport Authority's (CHO) application to the U.S. Department of Tran.sportation's Small 

Community Air Service Development Program (SC.ASDP). The .Airport's grant 

application highlights the need to improve the quality of service and airfares at CHO and 

requests financial assistance to pursue new nonstop service to Chicago-O'Harc 

International Ainx>rt (ORD). The availability of quality, commercial air service has a 

profound impact on the region's economy through improved access for visitors but 

equally important, supports the needs of area businesses, organizations and educational 

institutions. 

1 want to assure you that the "public ~ private" partnership that has been developed 

between CHO and the Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce for the purpose oi' 

supporting new non.stop air service to ORD will have our full support. Where small 

community air service initiatives are concerned, ii is partnerships like this that can make 

a difference. We have every confidence that the program will have the full support of the 

Greater Charlottesville comnuinity. 

Sincerely. 

dlenn Rust 

President and CEO 

iXinamr. 4tU IVopli- Hut. C-i.'ik-dciviiit. \*A 21'iU
#### Paul Timothy SUGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-717.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 17, 1978.

PER CURIAM.

Paul Timothy Suggs takes this appeal from the denial of his *pro se*motion denominated “Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence; Hearing, Appeal Rule 3.850.” Appellant does not challenge the legality of the judgments or sentences against him. Rather, he seeks a reduction in his ten-year sentences for armed robbery and attempted first degree murder on the basis of certain factors which might be construed as mitigating.

Such relief is properly sought under Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.800, and not under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. No appeal lies from the denial of a motion for reduction of a legal sentence filed pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800. *Parker v. State,*214 So.2d 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2433 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take actions 

necessary to ensure that certain individuals may update 

the burn pit registry with a registered individual’s cause 

of death, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2433 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burn Pit Registry En3 hancement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BURN PIT REGISTRY UPDATES. 

5 (a) INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO UPDATE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec8 retary of Veterans Affairs shall take actions nec9 essary to ensure that the burn pit registry may be 

10 updated with the cause of death of a deceased reg11 istered individual by— 

12 (A) an individual designated by such de13 ceased registered individual; or 

14 (B) if no such individual is designated, an 

15 immediate family member of such deceased reg16 istered individual. 

17 (2) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall pro18 vide, with respect to the burn pit registry, a process 

19 by which a registered individual may make a des20 ignation for purposes of paragraph (1)(A). 

21 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

22 (1) The term ‘‘burn pit registry’’ means the 

23 registry established under section 201 of the Dig24 nified Burial and Other Veterans’ Benefits Improve25 ment Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 

26 527 note). 
3 

•HR 2433 EH

1 (2) The term ‘‘immediate family member’’, with 

2 respect to a deceased individual, means— 

3 (A) the spouse, parent, brother, sister, or 

4 adult child of the individual; 

5 (B) an adult person to whom the indi6 vidual stands in loco parentis; or 

7 (C) any other adult person— 

8 (i) living in the household of the indi9 vidual at the time of the death of the indi10 vidual; and 

11 (ii) related to the individual by blood 

12 or marriage. 

13 (3) The term ‘‘registered individual’’ means an 

14 individual registered with the burn pit registry. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2433 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take 

purposes. istered individual’s cause of death, and for other uals may update the burn pit registry with a regactions necessary to ensure that certain individ-
1

G-7 FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OF CYBER EXERCISE PROGRAMMES

The financial sector is increasingly reliant on information technology services and their interdependencies 

to deliver most financial services. Disruption to those services, maliciously, inadvertently or otherwise, 

can cause significant impact on an organization’s ability to deliver critical services. The G-7 Cyber Expert 

Group (‘CEG’) recognizes that in order to better understand these dependencies and the ability of 

organizations to respond to and recover from incidents, it is important that both public and private 

financial sector entities regularly exercise their cyber incident response and recovery plans. To facilitate 

the financial sector’s incident preparedness, the CEG published the Fundamental Elements of Cyber

Exercise Programmes, a set of non-binding elements which encapsulate effective practices for developing 

a cyber exercise program for public and private financial sector entities.

The Fundamental Elements of Cyber Exercise Programmes set out non-binding, high-level building blocks 

that serve as tools to guide the establishment of cyber exercise programmes with internal and external 

stakeholders. They may also serve as a guide for establishing cyber exercise programmes across 

jurisdictions and sectors. Through the publication of the document, the CEG aims to improve upon the G7 jurisdiction’s ability to conduct cyber exercises in the financial sector that test their incident 

management capabilities. Furthermore, the publication is meant to encourage individual financial sector 

organizations and jurisdictions outside of the G-7 to build upon this work to enhance the resilience of the 

international financial sector.

While legally non-binding, the Fundamental Elements of Cyber Exercise Programmes set out a clear, 

effective practices for developing and running an exercise programme, which can be applied by financial 

institutions and authorities alike. The guidance is designed to be tailored to different jurisdictions and to 

firms of different sizes and levels of maturity.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                             CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share



                                                 Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                  2002                  2001
                                                  ----                  ----
Computation of share totals used in
  computing earnings per share:

Weighted average number
 of shares outstanding                         18,759,318            18,857,297

Basic average shares
 a-outstanding                                 18,759,318            18,857,297

Incremental shares arising, from
 outstanding stock options                         53,224                43,282
                                             ------------          ------------
 b-Totals                                      18,812,542            18,900,579
                                             ============          ============
 c-Net Income                                $  2,795,818          $  1,355,749
                                             ============          ============

Net Income Per Share
 Basic - c/a                                 $       0.15          $       0.07
                                             ============          ============

Net Income Per Share
 assuming full dilution c/b                  $       0.15          $       0.07
                                             ============          ============