alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000024148
[NAME] CONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LTD
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
[CASH]                                         1215426                 1215426
[SECURITIES]                                         0                       0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0                       0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0                       0
[INVENTORY]                                          0                       0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                294984                  294984
[PP&E]                                        13990040                13990040
[DEPRECIATION]                                11498801                11498801
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 4001649                 4001649
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          2402246                 2402246
[BONDS]                                              0                       0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0                       0
[PREFERRED]                                          0                       0
[COMMON]                                             0                       0
[OTHER-SE]                                     1599403                 1599403
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   4001649                 4001649
[SALES]                                         133594                  402173
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                133594                  402173
[CGS]                                                0                       0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0                       0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                193795                  571077
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0                       0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0                       0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                (60201)                (168904)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0                       0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            (60201)                (168904)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0                       0
[CHANGES]                                            0                       0
[NET-INCOME]                                   (60201)                (168904)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                   (1.91)                  (5.35)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (1.91)                  (5.35)
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Jack Krings,
President, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of CPI
Corp., a Delaware Corporation, certify that: (1)
  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
  of CPI Corp.;(2)
  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
  such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
  by this report;(3)
  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
  other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
  flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)
  The registrants other certifying officers and I are
  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:(a)
  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
  supervisions, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
  those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared;(b)
  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
  procedures, as of the end  of the
  period covered by this report based on such evaluations;(c)
  disclosed in this report any change in the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
  the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
  reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
  over financial reporting; and(5)
  The registrants other certifying officers and I
  have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
  financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
  registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
  functions):(a)
  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
  in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting  which are reasonably likely to adversely
  affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
  financial information; and(b)
  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Jack KringsJack KringsPresident, Acting Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Operating OfficerDate: June 10, 2004
~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~---------------------. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

1 9 20!6 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

d-01 Lo- 4cJ 

In the matter of: 

AERO TECH, LLC. _______ ) 

FAA Docket No. CP-Judge Douglas M. Rawald 

Case No. 2015WA910115 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I. Stephen Doerr, Esq., do hereby certify that on the 141

h day of September, 2016, 

one (1) original and one (1) copy of: 

Aero Tech, LLC's First interrogatories and Request for Production to Federal Aviation 

Administration 

was sent via First-Class Mail, to the following: 

Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Attn. Patricia L. Baysinger 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

222 West 71

h Avenue Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

1 

Steph n r, Esq. 

Respondents Counsel 

Doerr & Knudson, P.A. 

212 W. First Street 

Portales, NM 88130 

(T) 575-359-1289 

(F) 575-359-1898
<Page>

                                                                  Exhibit 99.3.2

   Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Edward J. Rasmussen, the Chief Financial Officer of Orange and Rockland
Utilities, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, which this
statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Edward J. Rasmussen
                                            Edward J. Rasmussen


Dated: August 12, 2002
#### T. O. TOWSON and his wife, Helen E. Towson, Appellants, v. CITY OF LAKELAND, Florida, a Municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 68-630.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

July 1, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
Template for certification accompanying Declaration: 

Pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 800.404(d), I hereby certify that I am [“the Chief Executive Officer” or 

“a duly authorized designee, as defined at 31 C.F.R. § 800.204(b),”] of [the submitting 

entity], which is submitting the foregoing Declaration, and that, to the best of my knowledge and 

belief subject to the penalties provided in section 1001 of Title 18, United States Code: 

1. The foregoing Declaration fully complies with the requirements of Section 721 of the

Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, 31 C.F.R. Part 800, and [any agreement or

condition entered into with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United

States (the “Committee”) or any member agency of the Committee acting on its

behalf]; and [Note: A submitting entity that is not subject to an applicable agreement

or condition may omit the inapplicable term.]

2. The foregoing Declaration, as it relates to the transaction, [the submitting entity], and

[the submitting entity’s] parents, affiliates, and any other related entities described in the

Declaration, is accurate and complete in all material respects. [Note: A submitting entity

that does not have parents, affiliates, and/or subsidiaries, may omit the inapplicable

term(s).]

Signature: 

__________________________ [include printed name of signer] 

Title: 

__________________________ 

Submitter: 

__________________________ [identify the party to the transaction on whose behalf the 

individual above has signed the certification] 

Date: 

__________________________
Treasury approves Guam’s plan to invest $7.1 million of CPF funding in a 

multi-purpose community facility to improve resources for communities 

that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Guam

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $7.1 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (50% of 

CPF allocation)

 Program Description: The construction of the Student

Success Center (SSC) will provide computer access, host

health and wellness fairs, and a variety of educational

and workforce development seminars to benefit the

community. The SSC will replace the former center, which

no longer meets the community’s needs. 

 Key State Contact: Guam’s Bureau of Budget and Management Research

Guam’s Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Guam estimates this 

project will serve over 

3,100 residents 

each year.
254 La. 775

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony Joseph BARLOTTA.

No. 50155.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 3, 1969.

In re: Anthony Joseph Barlotta applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Application denied. We find no merit in relator’s request.
EXHIBIT 99.2 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
               1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
               OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPI Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 26, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary W. Douglass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Subsection 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Subsection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
    Company.



By:  /s/ Gary W. Douglass
     --------------------------
         Gary W. Douglass
         Executive Vice President, Finance
         and Chief Financial Officer
         June 5, 2003







29
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Marvin L. BURTON.

No. 61412.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

In re: Marvin L. Burton, applying for writ of certiorari and review. Parish of Ouachita.

Writ denied.

TATE, DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ.,. would grant the writ.
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2022*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter -358.22

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE^

3-Year Note 4/18 46.00 -2.00

10-Year Note (r) 4/18 34.00 -2.00

30-Year Bond (r) 4/18 20.00 -2.00 65.10 34.90

5-Year TIPS 4/29 20.00 1.00 0.00 20.00

20-Year Bond (r) 5/2 16.00 -4.00

2-Year Note 5/2 48.00 -2.00

2-Year FRN 5/2 24.00 -2.00

5-Year Note 5/2 49.00 -2.00

7-Year Note 5/2 44.00 -3.00 152.21 28.79

3-Year Note 5/16 46.00 0.00

10-Year Note 5/16 36.00 -1.00

30-Year Bond 5/16 22.00 -1.00 47.85 56.15

2-Year FRN (r) 5/27 22.00 0.00 0.00 22.00

20-Year Bond 5/31 17.00 -2.00

10-Year TIPS (r) 5/31 14.00 0.00

2-Year Note 5/31 48.00 0.00

5-Year Note 5/31 49.00 0.00

7-Year Note 5/31 43.00 -1.00 90.45 80.55

3-Year Note 6/15 46.00 0.00

10-Year Note (r) 6/15 33.00 -1.00

30-Year Bond (r) 6/15 19.00 -1.00 23.08 74.92

2-Year FRN (r) 6/24 22.00 0.00 0.00 22.00

20-Year Bond (r) 6/30 14.00 -2.00

5-Year TIPS (r) 6/30 18.00 1.00

2-Year Note 6/30 48.00 0.00

5-Year Note 6/30 49.00 0.00

7-Year Note 6/30 42.00 -1.00 86.09 84.91

889.00 464.78 424.22

Estimates are italicized. r = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 66

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 1/31/2022 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000072741
<NAME> NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,041,548
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    867,294
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,176,682
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     4,179,422
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,264,946
<COMMON>                                       686,188
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      940,405
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            597,505
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,094,436
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          137,289
<PREFERRED>                                    136,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,946,588
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             251,100
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  363,543
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       46,250
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     71,268
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               120,128
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               3,968,482
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               10,264,946
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    3,322,515
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            72,961
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,953,885
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,065,841
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        256,674
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (29,888)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 265,781
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       198,346
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,435
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     17,545
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   49,890
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        13,157
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         610,136
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Kirin International Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2011 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: June 15, 2011
/s/ Longlin HuLonglin HuPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 Date: June 15, 2011
/s/ Xin ZhengXin ZhengChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Kirin International Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Kirin International Holding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
#### SUBARU OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., Appellant, v. RON NORRIS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-564.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 26, 1971.

Jules S. Cohen, Orlando, for appellant.

Richard H. Miller, of Crofton, Holland & Starling, Titusville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed in all respects except the allowance of interest at the rate of eight and three-fourths percent per annum. That feature of the judgment is reversed with directions to allow interest at the statutory rate.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

WALDEN, REED, JJ., and DOWNEY, JAMES C., Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT

|   | CPI CORP. |                                  |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------|
|   |      |                                  |   |
|   | By:       | /s/Renato Cataldo                     |   |
|   |      | Renato Cataldo                        |   |
|   |      | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |      |                                  |   |

|   |   |              |
|--------|--------|-------------------|
|   |   |              |   |
|   |   | /s/David M. Meyer |   |
|   |   | David M. Meyer    |   |
|   |   |              |   |
[737 NYS2d 721]

#### In the Matter of John W. Steinbach, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

December 21, 2001

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Andrea T. Burciaga, Associate Counsel, Seventh Judicial District Grievance Committee,*Rochester, for petitioner.

*John W. Steinbach,*Liverpool, respondent *pro se.*

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 20, 1974, and formerly maintained an office for the practice of law in Cicero. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of professional miscon*82duct including conversion. Respondent filed an answer admitting the allegations of the petition and appeared before this Court to submit matters in mitigation.

Respondent admits that, as counsel for the sellers in a real estate transaction, he accepted a check from which he was to pay the broker’s commission in the amount of $2,800. He deposited the check into his attorney trust account and thereafter issued checks drawn on the trust account for personal purposes, causing the balance in the account to fall below the amount owed to the broker. The broker obtained a judgment against respondent for the amount of the commission, which remains unsatisfied.

We conclude that respondent violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (a) (7) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [7]) — engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer; and

DR 9-102 (a) (22 NYCRR 1200.46 [a]) — misappropriating funds belonging to another person that are in his possession incident to his practice of law.

We have considered the matters submitted by respondent in mitigation, including his expression of remorse. We note, however, that financial difficulty does not justify or excuse conversion. Accordingly, after consideration of all the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended for a period of two years and until further order of the Court. Additionally, we direct respondent to make restitution in accordance with the order entered herewith.

Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Scudder and Burns, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension and restitution entered.
Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund

Split Payments to State Governments

December 16, 2021

Under the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund, Treasury has the authority to split funding 

into two equal payments for States and territories. Specifically: 

The Secretary shall have the authority to withhold payment of up to 50 percent of 

the amount allocated to each State and territory (other than payment of the 

amount allocated under paragraph (3)(B)(ii) to the District of Columbia) for a 

period of up to 12 months from the date on which the State or territory provides 

the certification required under subsection (d)(1). The Secretary shall exercise 

such authority with respect to a State or territory based on the unemployment rate 

in the State or territory as of such date.

Based on this provision, Treasury will split the total amount of state funding into two equal 

payments for all State governments, except for States where the unemployment rate is 2.0 or more 

percentage points above its pre-pandemic level. For further discussion of Treasury’s rationale for 

exercising the authority and setting the threshold, see the Interim Final Rule.1 

The table below lists which State governments have received split payments (for States that 

have already certified).

State Subject to split? State Subject to split? State Subject to split? 

Alabama Yes Kentucky Yes North Dakota No

Alaska Yes Louisiana No Ohio Yes

Arizona Yes Maine Yes Oklahoma Yes

Arkansas Yes Maryland No Oregon No

California No Massachusetts No Pennsylvania No

Colorado No Michigan Yes Rhode Island No

Connecticut No Minnesota Yes South Carolina No

Delaware No Mississippi Yes South Dakota Yes

Dist. of Columbia No Missouri Yes Tennessee Yes

Florida Yes Montana Yes Texas No

Georgia Yes Nebraska Yes Utah Yes

Hawaii No Nevada No Vermont Yes

Idaho Yes New Hampshire Yes Virginia No

Illinois No New Jersey No Washington Yes

Indiana Yes New Mexico No West Virginia Yes

Iowa Yes New York No Wisconsin Yes

Kansas Yes North Carolina Yes Wyoming Yes

1 As discussed in the Interim Final Rule, no territory will receive a split payment.
**Exhibit 32.2.2**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

 

I, Robert N. Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2007, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: August 2, 2007