alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**I, James R. Riedman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         */s/ James R. Riedman*   Name:  *James R. Riedman*   Title:  *Chief Executive Officer*   Date:  *August 15, 2006*   A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and willbe retained by Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 21.0**

 

**Subsidiaries**

 
|                               | ** ** | **Percentage********Ownership** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction or********State of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| **Registrant**                     |       |                            |       |                                                             |       |
| ** **                         |       |                            |       |                                                             |       |
| Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.       |       |                            |       | Maryland                                                         |       |
|                               |       |                            |       |                                                             |       |
| **Subsidiaries**                   |       |                            |       |                                                             |       |
|                               |       |                            |       |                                                             |       |
| Fox Chase Bank                     |       | 100                             | %          | United States                                               |       |
|                               |       |                            |       |                                                             |       |
| Fox Chase Financial, Inc. (1) |       | 100                             | %          | Delaware                                                         |       |
|                               |       |                            |       |                                                             |       |
| Fox Chase Service Corporation (1)  |       | 100                             | %          | Pennsylvania                                                     |       |

 

----

(1)                   Wholly owned subsidiary of Fox Chase Bank.

 

----
#### Michael MCNEILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF PARADISE VALLEY, an Arizona town; et al, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-17003.

D.C. No. CV-99-00332-RCB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 19, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants in his action alleging civil rights and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”) violations stemming from the issuance of a traffic citation on the basis of a photo radar. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815, 816 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and RICO claims against Johnson and Lynch on grounds of judicial immunity, and Kennedy on grounds of prosecutorial immunity. *See Ashelman v. Pope,*793 F.2d 1072, 1075 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc).

A municipal entity cannot constitute a RICO enterprise; therefore, the RICO claim fails. *See Lancaster Comm. Hosp. v. Antelope Valley Hosp.,*940 F.2d 397, 404 (9th Cir.1991).

Summary judgment for Paradise Valley was proper because sending a traffic citation to the registered owner of a vehicle based on the photo radar system does not constitute a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. *See Brower v. County of Inyo,*489 U.S. 593, 596,109 S.Ct. 1378,103 L.Ed.2d 628 (1989) (A “seizure” under the Fourth Amendment “requires an intentional acquisition of physical control”). Additionally, because McNeill successfully challenged the citation in municipal court, he received all the process he was due. *cf. Brady v. Gebbie,*859 F.2d 1543, 1554 (9th Cir.1988).

The district court properly denied McNeill’s motion for a temporary restraining order. *See City of Los Angeles, v. Lyons,*461 U.S. 95, 111-112, 103 S.Ct. 1660, 75 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983).

We have considered McNeill’s remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 15

- 00519

- CV

EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC. and Laredo Marine, L.L.C.,

Appellants

v.

COUNTY OF LA SALLE

, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 04

- 00108

- CVL

Honorable Russel l Wilson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 25, 2015

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellants filed a motion to dismiss this accelerated appeal. We grant the motion. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellants. See id. R. 42.1( d)

(absent agreement of parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
;p "ty£2arf 

### ££i£i£0L3A mrnHJ- -miLtwiA 

## hj®JkJ$4d*t : -rf-+—-^
'xiutmmF&xuiwi

— jffl&£u$£ujS-4* 

### tfrnutdh-j/kufy 

## oqubueom&S^ M&-£WduM*£19a0- SEP 1i 7,?;; ^^msmrk 

### $&}W»,Jj-3y££3L
No. 72-5950.

#### Buford *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.1     Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of Metrospaces, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the****Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Metrospaces, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Carlos Daniel Silva, Principal Executive Officer of Metrospaces, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 22, 2015

By: /s/ Carlos Daniel Silva                                Principal executive officer; Director;                Acting principal accounting officer;                Acting principal financial officer
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (FileNo. 333-122199, 333- 114739 and 333-139179) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-121140, 333-105453 and333-135744) of Cash Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated March 14, 2007, relating tothe consolidated financial statements, the financial statement schedule, management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears on pages 20, 23, F-2, of this annual report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLPMinneapolis, Minnesota
#### Robert Ray STROUP, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-899.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 13, 1972.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner alleges in his petition that he is presently confined in the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas. He further alleges that in 1958 he was convicted of robbery in the Criminal Court of Hillsborough County, Florida and upon conviction was adjudged guilty and sentenced to three (3) years in prison. He further alleges that during the entire proceedings in Florida he was without benefit of counsel, never informed of his right to counsel, was without funds to obtain counsel and at no time did he waive counsel.

Petitioner filed a motion for post-conviction relief under the provisions of Rule 3.850 FRCrP, 33 F.S.A. in the Criminal Court of Hillsborough County, Florida in March 1972. This motion was denied in May 1972 on the grounds that the sentence had expired. Petitioner did not appeal the denial of his motion.

We must deny the present petition; however, such denial is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to file another motion under Rule 3.850 FRCrP in view of the recent case of Wilcox v. State, 267 So.2d 15 (Fla.App.1972) and the cases cited therein.

Petition denied without prejudice.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JT., concur.
Served: January 7, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

----------------------------------------------------------------

MESABA AVIATION, INC.

D/B/A MESABA AIRLINES

D/B/A NORTHWEST AIRLINK

D/B/A DELTA CONNECTION

----------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On December 17, 2010, Mesaba Aviation, Inc. (“Mesaba”), requested that the Department register 

the trade name “US Airways Express.”

1

As required by Part 215 (14 CFR 215) of the Department’s regulations, any air carrier wishing to use 

an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states 

that the Department may register such trade name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly 

named air carriers of the proposed use of the trade name. Mesaba states that it recently entered into 

a code share agreement with US Airways, under which it will conduct certain operations using the 

US Airways Express trade name on behalf of US Airways. Further, Mesaba states that US Airways 

is aware of and concurs with its request to register the trade name. Moreover, other than the US 

Airways’ code-share partners previously authorized to use the trade name “US Airways Express,” 

we identified no other air carriers using a similar name. Since Mesaba complied with the 

requirements of Part 215, we orally approved registration of the US Airways Express trade name for 

use in its operations on December 17, 2010.

Dated at Washington, D.C., January 7, 2011.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov

 

1 See Order 98-7-6, as reissued on July 8, 1998.
Served: January 7, 2011

Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR MESABA AVIATION, INC.

MS MEGAN RAE ROSIA

VICE PRESIDENT GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

PINNACLE AIRLINES CORP

1689 NONCONNAH BLVD

MEMPHIS TN 38132

MR PETER LYNCH (AGC-300)

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

MR JOHN LYONS

POI FOR MESABA AVIATION INC

FAA/MINNEAPOLIS FSDO

6020 28TH AVENUE SOUTH

ROOM 201

MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450-2700

MR CLAY MORITZ (RTS-42)

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR WILLIAM J WEBER (AFS-900)

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166 

BERNARD STANKUS, RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
#### Henry COOPER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Robert E. Metzker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Attys. Gen., fo.r appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239; and Powe v. State, Fla.1968, 216 So.2d 446.
TS- ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #3 Pt. 1, Sec. B CA S Inventory Expert Service Report s and Chemical Structure s of the New Chemical Substance s The following pag es give the CAS Inventory Expert Service (IES) Report s on the new chemical substance s . The chemical structure s of the compounds are also provided.,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU &$,QGH[1DPH,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU &$,QGH[1DPH,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU &$,QGH[1DPH,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU &$,QGH[1DPH,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU &$,QGH[1DPH
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130756 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ROSIA MITCHELL-CRENSHAW, Stephen J. Markman, Successor Personal Representative Justices of the Estate of Floyd L. Mitchell, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130756 COA: 263057 Oakland CC: 2004-060421-NH LONNIE JOE, JR., M.D., and PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendants,

and

BERNARD KOLE, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 17, 2 007, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in
Braverman v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-6). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on April 9, 2008, 480 Mich 1159 (2008), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be review ed by this Court.

l0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
#### Glenda V. TEUTON, Individually, and as the next friend and natural guardian and parent of Susan Elizabeth Teuton, and Susan Elizabeth Teuton, Individually, Appellants, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF MANATEE COUNTY, Florida, and William H. Bashaw as Superintendent of Schools for Manatee County, Florida, Appellees.

No. 72-660.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 11.1 CPI Corp.
Computation of Per Common Share Earnings (Loss) - Diluted(Unaudited) thousands, except share and per share data16 Weeks
  Ended
  
  40 Weeks
  EndedNovember
  13,
  2004
  
  November
  8,
  2003
  
  November
  13,
  2004
  
  November
  8,
  2003Diluted:Net loss applicable to
  common shares:From continuing operations
  
  $
  (13,438
  )
  $
  (2,421
  )
  $
  (27,607
  )
  $
  (4,715
  )From discontinued
  operations
  
  
  (7
  )
  
  (1,956
  )
  
  (3,744
  )
  
  (3,217
  )Net loss
  
  $
  (13,445
  )
  $
  (4,377
  )
  $
  (31,351
  )
  $
  (7,932
  )Shares:Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding
  
  
  18,423,933
  
  
  18,339,623
  
  
  18,403,416
  
  
  18,339,325Shares issuable under
  employee stock plans -weighted average
  
  
  
  *
  
  
  **
  
  
  ***
  
  
  ****Diluted effect of exercise
  of certain stock options
  
  
  
  *
  
  
  **
  
  
  ***
  
  
  ****Less: Treasury stock -
  weighted average
  
  
  (10,672,236
  )
  
  (10,267,793
  )
  
  (10,476,110
  )
  
  (10,250,099
  )Weighted average number of
  common and common equivalent shares outstanding
  
  
  7,751,697
  
  
  8,071,830
  
  
  7,927,306
  
  
  8,089,226Net loss per common and
  common equivalent shares:From continuing operations
  
  $
  (1.73
  )
  $
  (0.30
  )
  $
  (3.48
  )
  $
  (0.58
  )From discontinued
  operations
  
  
  
  
  
  (0.24
  )
  
  (0.47
  )
  
  (0.40
  )Net loss
  
  $
  (1.73
  )
  $
  (0.54
  )
  $
  (3.95
  )
  $
  (0.98
  )  *
  The effect of 17,003 shares
  issuable under employee stock plans was not considered as the effect is
  antidilutive.**
  The effect of stock options
  in the amount of 53,900 shares and 18,415 shares issuable under employee
  stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.***
  The effect of stock options
  in the amount of 21,916 shares and 17,137 shares issuable under employee
  stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.****
  The effect of stock options
  in the amount of 28,342 shares and 18,415 shares issuable under employee
  stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.
EXHIBIT 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DE ACQUISITION 6, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periods ending February 28, 2011 and 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Ruth Shepley
Ruth Shepley, President
May 17, 2011
FORM 10-K/A

                        SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20549

       [X]      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                     THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

           For the Fiscal Year Ended        July 31, 1996

                                      OR

       [ ]    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                           SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           For the transition period from              to

                           COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-8147

                               CONOLOG CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

                                   Delaware
                            (State of Incorporation)

                                  52-0853566
                    (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

                        5 Columbia Road, Somerville, N.J.
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                                     08876
                                   (Zip Code)

                                 (908) 722-8081
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

                                 NOT APPLICABLE
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year if changed since last
report)


Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all annual,
quarterly and other reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding  12  months  (or
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports);
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


                          YES      X               NO











                             CONOLOG CORPORATION


                                   INDEX


                                                                PAGE NUMBER

     Signature                                                       3
     Exhibit Index                                                   3




















































                                   SIGNATURE


     Pursuant  to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934,
     the  Registrant  has duly caused this Form 10K/A to be  signed  on  its
     behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

     Dated: November 26, 1996


     CONOLOG CORPORATION



     By:/s/ Robert S. Benou





                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

     Exhibit             Description              Page No.

       27               Financial Data               4
                          Schedule