alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMISSORY NOTE
$250,000.00                                               July 1, 1997

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Classic Restaurants International, 
Inc. ("Classic") hereby promises to pay to the order of Voyager Select IPO 
Fund, Ltd., a Bermuda corporation, or its assignee ("Payee"), at such place 
as Payee or any holder may from time to time designate, the principal sum of 
TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($250,000.00). The principal hereof 
and any unpaid accrued interest thereon shall be due and payable on July 1, 
1998.  Payment of all amounts due hereunder shall be made at the address of 
the Payee provided for in this Note.  Classic further promises to pay 
interest at the rate of eight per cent (8%) per annum on the outstanding 
principal balance hereof.  The accrued interest shall be payable in cash or 
common stock at the Payee's option. 

     This Note has been issued pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement 
dated as of June 23, 1997 between Classic and the Payee (the "Agreement"), 
which contains representations and warranties and additional covenants of 
Classic with respect to this Note.  THE PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT ARE 
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE.

     Classic and all endorsers, guarantors and sureties hereof hereby 
severally waive diligence, demand, presentment, protect and notice of any 
kind, and assent to extensions of the time of payment, release, surrender or 
substitution of security, or forbearance or other indulgence, without notice.

     Classic may, at its option, at any time and from time to time, prepay 
all or any part of the principal balance of this Note, without penalty or 
premium, provided that concurrently with such prepayment Classic shall pay 
accrued interest, if any, on the principal so prepaid to the date of such 
prepayment.

     This Note may not be changed, modified or terminated orally, but only by 
agreement in writing signed by the party to be charged.

     In the event Payee or any holder hereof shall refer this Note to an 
attorney for collection, Classic agrees to pay, in addition to unpaid 
principal and interest, if any, all the costs and expenses incurred in 
attempting or effecting collection hereunder, including reasonable attorney's 
fees, whether or not suit is instituted.

     In the event of any litigation with respect to this Note, Classic waives 
the right to trial by jury and all rights of set off and rights to interpose 
counterclaims and cross-claims.  Classic hereby irrevocably consents to the 
jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California in connection with any 
action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Note.

     This Note shall be governed by California law, without reference to any 
choice of law principles thereof.


                            CLASSIC RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                            \s\ James R. Shaw
                            By:  James R. Shaw, President

</TEXT
DRAFT February 3, 2015 

Pre-Meeting Materials for the EPA-FLM-RPO-States-Tribes Meeting 

on the Future of the Regional Haze Program

1

DRAFT AGENDA

EPA-FLM-RPO-States-Tribes Meeting on the Future of the Regional Haze 

Program

March 3 – 4, 2015

EPA Campus

Research Triangle Park, NC

Purpose of meeting: For Regional Planning Organizations (RPOs), states, and tribes to provide

EPA feedback on topics related to the planned Regional Haze Rule (RHR) revisions and 

guidance. Feedback will be used to develop options for EPA to consider for planned rule 

revisions and guidance documents. The Federal Land Managers (FLMs) will be present to 

listen to feedback directly.

Day 1

Start Time: 9:00 AM (To be discussed)

Introductions

Review Purpose, Format, Facilitation, and Ground Rules for the Meeting

Discussion of Topics Related to Rulemaking to Revising the RHR

I. Due Date for Second Planning Period SIPs (30 minutes) 1

A. Implications for interstate consultation 

II. Progress Reports (~1.5 hours)

A. Burden on the states if progress reports must be SIP revisions 

B. How many progress reports and when? 

C. Content of progress reports and procedures for developing and submitting them to 

EPA 

D. EPA review of progress reports 

Lunch in Cafeteria

Discussion of Topics Related to New Guidance

III. Uniform Rate of Progress (URP) and Reasonable Progress Goal (RPG) Framework (~1.5 

hours)

A. Addressing the impact of natural events 

B. Non-U.S. anthropogenic emissions

C. Re-estimating natural conditions

 

1

Times indicated will be refined based on pre-meeting discussions. The facilitator will have discretion to subdivide 

time among subtopics and to extend or close off discussion of particular topics, based on the demonstrated level 

of interest and likely utility of further discussion.
DRAFT February 3, 2015 

Pre-Meeting Materials for the EPA-FLM-RPO-States-Tribes Meeting 

on the Future of the Regional Haze Program

2

D. Translating the long term strategy into reasonable progress goals

E. Consistency across the RPG framework 

Day 2

Start Time: 8:30 AM (To be discussed)

Discussion of Topics Related to New Guidance, continued

IV. Reasonable Progress and Long Term Strategy (3.5 hours)

A. Determining cross-state impacts 

B. Linkage between the URP and the determination of whether the long term strategy 

provides reasonable progress 

C. Tiering (or screening out) sources for the four factor analysis 

D. The four factor analysis 

E. Consideration of visibility impacts 

F. Smaller point sources, area sources, and mobile sources 

Lunch in Cafeteria

Discussion of Parking Lot Topics If Any

Wrap Up: Action Items and Next Steps

 Opportunity to submit additional written input

 Identify any immediate information needs of RPOs, states, and tribes

 Next steps, including forums for more in depth discussions of technical issues

Adjourn – 3:00 PM (To be discussed)
No. 01-15-00234-CV

In the Court of Appeals

for the First District of Texas

M&E ENDEAVOURS LLC,

APPELLANT,

VS.

CINTEX WIRELESS LLC,

APPELLEE.

APPELLANT’S NOTICE OF PAYMENT FOR THE COURT REPORTER’S RECORD

Appellant M&E Endeavours LLC provides notice that it paid for the court reporter’s

record on May 28, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

Triantaphyllis Law Firm

/s/ Anastassios Triantaphyllis

By: Anastassios Triantaphyllis

State Bar No. 20213600

The Civil Justice Center

112 E. 4th Street

Houston, Texas 77007

Telephone No. (713) 240-7650

Telecopier No. (713) 520-8991

Email tasso@tasso.us

Attorney for M&E Endeavours LLC

ACCEPTED

2012-06803

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/29/2015 11:57:33 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/29/2015 11:57:33 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above was served upon counsel

for Defendant Cintex Wireless LLC by and through its attorney of record, Nelson S. Ebaugh,

Nelson S. Ebaugh, P.C., 2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 1, Houston, Texas 77019, telecopier

(713) 739-0500, Email nebaugh@ebaughlaw.com, by telecopier, receipted hand delivery or

certified first class mail on May 29, 2015.

/s/ Anastassios Triantaphyllis

Anastassios Triantaphyllis
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04861

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04861\04861_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04861\04861_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04861\04861_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04861\04861_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04861\04861_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04861\04861_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04861\04861_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04861\04861_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04861\04861_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04861\Certification Statement Plant ID 04861.pdf Plant certification statement

04861\Supplemental Documents\04861_A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04861\Supplemental Documents\04861_A5-3 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04861\Supplemental Documents\04861_C2-31.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04861\Supplemental Documents\04861_D-1 Block Diagram Pond-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04861\Supplemental Documents\04861_D-2 Block Diagram Pond-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04861\Supplemental Documents\04861_D-3 Block Diagram WWT-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04861\04861_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04861\04861_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Santo PANEBIANGO v. MAIN INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 6079.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1973.

Monroe & Lemann, New Orleans, Emile E. Martin, III, Belle Chasse, and Peter G. Williams, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appel-lee.

Nelson, Nelson, Garretson, Lombard & Rothschild, Michael A. Dessommes, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before SAMUEL, GULOTTA and FLEMING, JJ.

SAMUEL, Judge.

The only matter before us at this time is a motion to dismiss the appeal taken by the defendant. Plaintiff has filed the motion in this court seeking the dismissal solely on the ground “ . . . that the appeal bond furnished by appellant herein is not a valid bond because there is no power of attorney attached thereto and made part of said bond as is required by law . . . ” The bond in question is signed on behalf of the appellant by a person designated as an attorney-in-fact and on behalf of the bondsman, Northwestern National Insurance Company, also by a person designated as an attorney-in-fact. No power of attorney is attached to the bond, nor is any power of attorney contained in the record.

This court is without authority to initially decide the issue presented. Under the pertinent articles of our Code of Civil Procedure, the motion must be addressed to the trial court which, even after the timely filing of the appeal bond, retains jurisdiction for the purpose of considering objections to the form, substance and sufficiency of the bond and of permitting the curing thereof. LSA-C.C.P. Arts. 2088, 5123, 5124 and 5126.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied and dismissed.

Motion dismissed.
258 La. 565

#### SOUTHERN SAVINGS ASSOCIATION v. ALLEN MORTGAGE & LOAN CORPORATION.

No. 51400.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1971.

In re: Allen Mortgage & Loan Corporation applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus or review.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Earl JOHNSON and Vandella Johnson, his wife, Appellants, v. W. B. TILTON, as Trustee, Appellee.

No. 69-424.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1970.

Carroll Dunscombe, Stuart, for appellants.

Charles N. Tilton, of Scott & Tilton, Jensen Beach, for appellee.

*208PER CURIAM.

The appeal filed in this case from a decision of the Circuit Court for Martin County, Florida, rendered in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction will be treated as a petition for certiorari. See Florida Constitution, Article 5, Sections 5(3) and 6(3), F.S.A. Compare Frazee v. Frazee, Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 484. Our review of the briefs and record and the oral argument fail to reveal any basis for the issuance of the writ. Therefore, certiorari is denied.

Certiorari denied.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
256 La. 373

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Vincent CEFALU et al.

No. 50598.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1970.

In re: OCE Corporation applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 233 So.2d 273.

Writ refused. There is no error of law in the ruling complained of by this applicant.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00094

- CR

LANE WESLEY KELLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1726293

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Lane Wesley Keller has filed a motion to dismiss th is appeal. As authorized by

Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure , we grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.2(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: July 24, 2018

Date Decided: July 25, 2018

Do Not Publish
#### Gerald Francis VANORMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1794.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 12, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence contains the phrase “hard labor” which is improper. *Knight v. State,*349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). We remand the case for correction of sentence. Appellant need not be present at that time.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and OTT, JJ., concur.
EX-10.7





 Exhibit 10.7 

** Document has been translated to English from the original document, which was in Spanish. 

 

	From:	 Enric Asunción Escorsa 



 

	CC:	 Juan Sagalés Cantenys 



 

	To:	 Inversiones Financieras Perseo, S.L. 



Barcelona, October 5, 2021             

This letter (the “Side Letter”) is issued in connection with the transaction agreed to in the Business Combination Agreement signed
on June 9, 2021 by Wall Box Chargers, S.L. (the “Company”), Orion Merger Sub Corp. and Kensington Capital Acquisition Corp II in order to enter into a merger agreement with Kensington Capital Acquisition Corp II and list on the New
York Stock Exchange. In connection with such agreement, the shareholders of the Company will, among other things, contribute their shares to the newly established company in the Netherlands: Wallbox BV (hereinafter the “Holdco”). 

Inversiones Financieras Perseo, S.L. is a shareholder of the Company. 

Enric Asunción Escorsa is CEO of the Company and a shareholder through the company Kariega Ventures, S.L. and will be a significant shareholder of
Holdco. 
 Perseo will be represented on the Board of Directors of Holdco. Perseo has indicated its interest that initially, and until it states otherwise,
Diego Díaz Pilas will be its representative on the Board of Directors. 
 This letter relates to the Board of Directors that will govern Holdco after
the completion of the SPAC transaction and is intended to reinforce the commitments already undertaken between the parties. 
 In relation to the foregoing,
whereas Inversiones Financieras Perseo S.L. (“Perseo”), a 100% owned subsidiary of the Iberdrola Group, is a principal shareholder of the Company and whereas there is an interest in Perseo, or such person as is appointed by Perseo, forming
part of the Board of Directors of Holdco, I Enric Asunción Escorsa, irrevocably agree to take my best efforts while Inversiones Financieras Perseo S.L. or any of the companies of the Iberdrola Group owns shares representing 3% of the
outstanding share capital of Holdco, to support the appointment of the person that Perseus puts forward as a director in the Board of Directors of Holdco. 
  

	
	 Enric Asunción Escorsa

	
	 Kariega Ventures, S.L.

	
	 /s/ Enric Asunción Escorsa
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

ZHENG DONG,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-0407

August 21, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lyann Goudie,

Judge.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alicia Winterkorn, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Daniel J. Fernandez, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Jan - Mar

2015 Actual 268 141 3 144 (123) 100 0

Apr - Jun

2015 Actual (120) 57 (22) 35 154 254 0

Jul - Sep

2015 Actual 163 133 (26) 107 (56) 199 0

Oct - Dec

2015 Actual 212 354 (7) 347 135 333 0

Jan - Mar

2016 Actual 266 244 3 247 (20) 314 0

Apr - Jun

2016 Actual (60) (25) 14 (10) 50 364 0

Jul - Sep

2016 Actual 234 222 2 224 (10) 353 0

Oct - Dec

2016 Actual 201 255 (8) 246 46 399 0

Jan - Mar

2017 Actual 335 40 (12) 28 (307) 92 0

Apr - Jun

2017 Actual (75) 35 (22) 14 89 181 0

Jul - Sep

2017 Actual 192 189 (19) 170 (22) 159 0

Oct - Dec

2017 Actual 204 282 (8) 274 70 229 (12)

Jan - Mar

2018 Actual 374 488 (54) 435 61 290 (30)

Apr - Jun

2018 Actual (43) 72 (72) 0 43 333 (48)

Jul - Sep

2018 Actual 212 353 (89) 264 52 385 (66)

Oct - Dec October 29, 2018 286 425 (114) 311 25 410 (91)

2018 Actual 291 426 (117) 309 17 402 (91)

Forecast Revisions 5 1 (4) (2) (8) (8) (0)

Jan - Mar October 29, 2018 383 356 (63) 293 (90) 320 (46)

2019 January 28, 2019 377 365 (70) 295 (82) 320 (46)

Forecast Revisions (6) 8 (7) 2 8 0 0

Apr - Jun

2019 January 28, 2019 (13) 83 (116) (33) (20) 300 (82)

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
Proposed European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)

Investment in Electroprivreda Bosne i Herzegovine (PBiH) Hydro Power Plants Project

(Bosnia Herzegovina)

September 17, 2013

United States Position

The United States is uncomfortable with the lack of information available to the board 

regarding the current state of the aquatic ecosystem in the Bosna River.

The United States appreciates that there was a requirement in the Environmental and 

Social Action Plan (ESAP) to conduct a study on this and to identify any necessary risk 

mitigants prior to board approval.

The United States believes it was correct to require this in the ESAP, and the United 

States is therefore disappointed that the study has not yet been completed and the Board 

is moving ahead with consideration without being fully informed of the possible impacts.

Therefore the United States will abstain.
#### Leon Frank GLAZER and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a foreign corporation doing business in Florida, Appellants, v. Jill Alison BOURG, etc. et al., Appellees.

No. 70-418.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 24, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roy RINGO.

No. 60910.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: State, thru District Attorney, Os-sie Brown, applying for supervisory writs. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Denied.
#### Henry WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-439.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION

We, Ronald W. Kaplan, President and Chief Executive Officer, and J. L.
Dickinson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Continental Global
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
       quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully
       complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
       Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald W. Kaplan                        /s/ J. L. Dickinson
----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Ronald W. Kaplan, President and             J. L. Dickinson, Vice President and
   Chief Executive Officer                     Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  May 15, 2006


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by Continental Global Group, Inc. for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that Continental Global Group, Inc. specifically
incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 15     November 7, 2008  Northeast Utilities 107 Selden Street Berlin, Connecticut 06037  We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the Company) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, as indicated in our report dated November 7, 2008 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of January 1, 2008); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-141425 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-63144, 333-121364 and 333-142724 on Forms S-8.  We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.   /s/Deloitte & Touche LLPDeloitte & Touche LLP  Hartford, Connecticut