alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 21, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00734

- CV

Luan Duy Nguyen, Individually and as Trustee for the Luan Duy Nguyen Revocable Management Trust and as Trustee for the Doan

- Nghiem Thi Nguyen Re vocable Management Trust , Appellant

v.

Rufina Hemmasi, and David Hemmasi, as Executor for the Estate of Majid Hemmasi, Deceased, d/b/a DRFM Investment , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court o n September 28, 2023 . Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that appellant has not prosecut ed his appeal and did not

comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for

want of prosecution. The appellan t shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court

and in the court b elow.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000025212
<NAME> COURIER CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,949<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       934
<INVENTORY>                                     10,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,679
<PP&E>                                          96,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,824<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,156
<SALES>                                         32,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,011
<CGS>                                           25,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    41
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,178
<INCOME-TAX>                                       350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                828
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE NET OF ALLOWANCES FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS
<F2>OTHER SE INCLUDES TREASURY STOCK
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.69

SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO
LICENSE AGREEMENTFinite #195-020Vendor #000-404-285

THIS
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT (Seventh Amendment) is made as of July
1, 2003 by and between SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., a New York corporation (Sears),
and CONSUMER PROGRAMS INCORPORATED, a Missouri corporation (Licensee).

REFERENCE
is made to the License Agreement made and entered into as of January 1, 1999, as
previously amended (the License Agreement) by and between Sears and Licensee
for the sale of products and services (the Licensed Business) at On Premises
locations.

WHEREAS,
Licensee desires to be released from certain obligations under the License Agreement that
restrict its opportunities to operate portrait studios in locations that are not owned or
controlled by Sears; and

WHEREAS,
Sears and Licensee desire to revise the commission structure set forth in the License
Agreement;

NOW,
THEREFORE, Sears and Licensee agree as follows:

1.       
          Any and all terms and definitions used herein shall have the same meaning as set
          forth in the License Agreement unless otherwise indicated herein.

2.       
          Section 5.18, as set forth in Section 2 of the Second Amendment to the License
          Agreement, dated as of November 10, 1999 (the Second Amendment), as
          amended by Section 1 of the Fifth Amendment to the License Agreement, dated as
          of November 20, 2002 (the Fifth Amendment) and as further amended by
          Section 1 of the Sixth Amendment to the License Agreement, dated as of November
          20, 2002 (the Sixth Amendment), is hereby deleted in its entirety.

3.       
          Section 14.7, as set forth in Section 6 of the Second Amendment, as amended by
          Section 2 of the Fifth Amendment, is hereby deleted in its entirety.

4.       
          Exhibit C is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by Exhibit C/A,
          attached hereto.

5.       
          The Fifth Amendment shall be deleted in its entirety.

Except as expressly modified by this
Seventh Amendment, all other provisions of the License Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect. To the extent that the terms of this Seventh Amendment are inconsistent
with any of the terms of the License Agreement, the terms of this Seventh Amendment shall
supercede and govern.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Sears and Licensee have signed this Seventh Amendment as of the date set
forth above by their duly authorized officers and agents.

| |      | SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
| | ---- | ----------------------
| |      |                       
| | By:  | /s/ John Pigott       
| |      | John Pigott           
| | Its: | Vice President        

| |      | CONSUMER PROGRAMS INCORPORATED
| | ---- | ------------------------------
| |      |                               
| | By:  | /s/ Jack Krings               
| |      | Jack Krings                   
| | Its: | Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
CONTINENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           5,897
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (76)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,916
<PP&E>                                          18,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,194)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,077
<BONDS>                                          2,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                                                       
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,951
<SALES>                                         11,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,416
<CGS>                                            9,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (82)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (135)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (135)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Corning Natural Gas Corporation Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act-filed as part of the 10-Q for Quarter Ended March 31, 2006.

Presented on signature page of 10-Q

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated: May 15, 2006
United States Position

IFC Proposed Investment - Pacific Infrastructure Ventures, Inc. (Colombia)

May 8, 2013

The United States welcomes the discussion of IFC’s proposed investment in Pacific 

Infrastructure Ventures, Inc. (PI). The United States notes the strategic importance of this 

investment which should help to address supply bottlenecks in Colombia's petroleum 

infrastructure, a sector which is of vital importance to the country's economy. 

The United States agrees that because of the potentially significant environmental and social 

impacts of this investment, the project's Category A rating is appropriate. The United States 

welcomes the frank discussion of risks in the project document, including environmental and 

social risks connected with the construction of the terminal and pipeline, as well as the steps 

taken and proposed to mitigate these risks. In particular, the United States notes the steps taken 

by PI to ensure consent from the communities located near the terminal, consistent with IFC

Performance Standard 7. The United States is also pleased to see the measures required by the 

IFC to strengthen PI’s environmental and social risk management systems, PI’s hiring of an 

Environmental and Social Advisory Consulting firm to monitor company compliance with the 

IFC Performance Standards, and the inclusion of a put option for IFC’s investment in case PI 

fails to comply with its obligations under the investment. 

Despite these mitigating measures, however, the United States remains concerned about the 

substantial risks which are magnified because of the lack of an Environmental and Social Impact 

Assessment (ESIA) for the pipeline project, the importance of the pipeline to deliver crude to the 

terminal, and the pipeline’s routing across a key biodiversity area. While the United States

understands that an alternative analysis for the pipeline’s route has been completed and 

disclosed, that the drafting of the ESIA is underway, and that preliminary consultations with 

affected communities have been conducted, there still appears to be a significant amount of 

uncertainty around the environmental and social risks involved with the pipeline and the work 

needed to properly address those risks. Given these risks and pressures, the United States

believes the IFC should have considered awaiting completion of the ESIA to ascertain a more 

complete understanding of risks prior to investment. The United States strongly agrees that it 

will be critical that IFC staff closely monitor the development of the pipeline to ensure 

compliance with IFC’s Performance Standards going forward. The United States is particularly 

interested in seeing a robust, and timely, process for engaging the communities affected by the 

pipeline. 

Finally, the United States understands that the ESIA for the pipeline will be posted to the IFC 

website when it is completed. 

With these comments, the United States wishes to be recorded as abstaining on the project for 

legislative mandated reasons and other environmental and social concerns stated above.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A (the "Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and I, Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated:  May 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6152
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SYLVESTER CLIFFORD PHILLIPS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-93-6, CA-95-278-1) Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylvester Clifford Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Phillips , Nos. CR-93-6; CA-95-278-1 (S.D.W. Va. Jan 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,359
<PP&E>                                           3,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        182
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,154
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,278
<CGS>                                            3,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    433
<INCOME-TAX>                                       156
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
254 La. 756

#### Elsie M. BRADFORD v. DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALS, State of Louisiana.

No. 49949.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Harold E. Forbes, Director of Personnel of the State Department of Civil Service applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. 222 So.2d 891.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 11
                     Computation of Per Share Earnings
For the three and nine months ended September 27, 1997 and September 28, 1996
                                (Unaudited)
                  (000's omitted except per share data)
                                
                                
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                             September    September   September    September
                             27, 1997     28, 1996    27, 1997     28, 1996

<S>                          <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>     
Primary Earnings Per Share:                                                
                                                                           
Net Income                   $   1,153    $  1,050    $  2,131     $  1,841
                                                                           
Weighted Average                                                           
 Shares Outstanding:                                                      
Common Shares                    1,103       1,103       1,103        1,106
Common Stock Equivalents            31          16          30           10
  Total                          1,134       1,119       1,133        1,116
                                                                           
Primary Earnings Per Share   $    1.02    $    .94     $  1.88     $   1.65
                                                                           
                                                                           
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:                                          
                                                                           
Net Income                   $   1,153    $  1,050     $ 2,131     $  1,841
                                                                           
Weighted Average                                                          
 Shares Outstanding:                                                      
Common Shares                    1,103       1,103       1,103        1,106
Common Stock Equivalents            33          18          33           18
  Total                          1,136       1,121       1,136        1,124
                                                                           
Fully Diluted Income                                                       
 Per Share                   $    1.01    $    .94     $  1.88     $   1.64
                                
                       
Notes:
Primary and fully diluted amounts are not reflected on the face of the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Retained Earnings because they 
differ from basic earnings per share by less than 3%.  Therefore, basic
earnings per share are presented on the face of the statements.
</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 20, 

2017.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-16-00943-CV

JOHN DUNN AND MILBY DUNN, II, Appellants 

V.

FARMASSURE LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 295th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-23040 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from an order signed October 31, 2016. On July 14, 2017, 

appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion 

is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Donovan, and Jewell.
#### Vincent MAZZULA, Appellant, v. Sylvia MAZZULA, Appellee.

No. 71-952.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 1973.

Johnie A. McLeod, Apopka, for appellant.

Johnson & Pánico, Maitland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our review of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed, except as hereinafter modified. The defendant shall be given credit for one-half of any amount derived from the proceeds of the sale of the automobile transferred to the plaintiff, such credit being applied to the judgment for arrearage previously entered against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff.

Affirmed, as modified.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MAG-ER, JJ., concur.