alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5

<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the March 31, 2000 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements
of income, reinvested earnings and cash flows for the three-month period ended
03/31/00 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                             9,475
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    143,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       5,852
<INVENTORY>                                                      183,402
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 363,639
<PP&E>                                                         3,766,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 1,230,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 3,528,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            331,861
<BONDS>                                                          772,721
<COMMON>                                                          91,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     1,273,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   3,528,953
<SALES>                                                          483,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 483,459
<CGS>                                                            403,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    403,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                20,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   41,428
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      16,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               25,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      25,271
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.28


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008

Commission File Number 000-00643

 

 

CORNING NATURAL GAS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

**New York **16-0397420
(State of incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
**330 West William Street, Corning New York 14830

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
**(607) 936-3755**
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ] Non-accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller Reporting Company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ]No [ X]

Indicate the number of Shares outstanding of each of the issuer's common stock as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $5.00 par value
809,550
Class
Shares outstanding as of May 14, 2008

As used in this Form 10-Q, the terms "Company," "Corning," "Registrant," "we," "us," and "our" mean Corning Natural Gas Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless the context indicates otherwise. Except as otherwise stated, the information contained in this Form 10-Q is as of March 31, 2008.
** 
**PART I. **FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. 
Financial Statements (Unaudited) 
Item 2. 
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Item 4T. 
Controls and Procedures**PART II. **OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. 
Legal Proceedings
Item 1A. 
Risk Factors
Item 2. 
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3. 
Defaults upon Senior Securities
Item 4. 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5.
Other Information
Item 6. 
Exhibits**SIGNATURES
 
**PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. 	Financial Statements.

 

 

 ********************
255 La. 917

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leslie WRIGHT, Jr.

No. 50516.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1970.

In re: Leslie Wright, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Virginia Peters BAIRD and Harry H. Baird, Jr., her husband, Appellants, v. The CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-707.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1970.

J. Russell Hornsby, of Law Offices of J. Russell Hornsby, Orlando, for appellants.

Donald L. Gattis, Jr., of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Although agreeing that the trial court correctly granted the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, as same were then constituted, we feel that the justice of the cause requires that plaintiffs be given an opportunity to amend their complaint so that it might be determined if a proper way exists whereby plaintiffs may avoid the defects revealed in their complaint. See Rule 1.010 and Rule 1.190(e) Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A. and Sea Shore Motel Corporation v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 233 So.2d 651, opinion filed March 16, 1970. We do not suggest, inferentially or otherwise, that their effort will be necessarily successful. We determine only that the rules should not be so finely drawn as to prohibit a second chance to plead an acceptable cause of action under the circumstances of this case where the pro*207cedure used was tantamount to that of a motion to dismiss.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Michael Mathews, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aspen Group, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.





Date: July 17, 2019



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael Mathews                                                  
|Michael Mathews
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. David Lee CAUDELL, Appellee.

No. 73-1229.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 23, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alphonse BAZILE.

No. 60131.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

*1020E. Craig Lundberg, Allspach & Lundberg, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record discloses that the defendant was sentenced on the same day his motion in arrest of judgment was denied and does not indicate that he waived the required twenty-four hour delay. La.C. Cr.P. art. 873. In addition, the minutes reflect that defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment *without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence,*while La. R.S. 40:966 B(1) provides that the appropriate penalty when a defendant has been convicted of distribution of heroin is “life imprisonment at hard labor . . . ” without any qualification as to defendant’s eligibility for parole, probation or suspension of sentence. *Compare*La.R.S. 40:966 C(1). Although defendant did not object to these errors at time of sentencing or urge them on appeal, they are considered by this Court since they are discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence. La. C.Cr.P. art. 920(2); *State v. Young,*337 So.2d 1196 (La.1976).

Defendant’s conviction is affirmed, but the sentence imposed is vacated and set aside, and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to sentence the defendant in accordance with law.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries



|                                       |  |                              
|-------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiaries:                          |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Chongqing Daqo New Energy Co., Ltd.    |  | Peoples Republic of China   
|Daqo Solar Energy North America        |  | United States of America     
|Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co., Ltd.     |  | Peoples Republic of China   
|Dago New Energy Holdings (Canada) Ltd. |  | Ontario, Canada              
|                                       | 
|Variable Interest Entity:              |  |                              
|Daqo New Material Co., Ltd.            |  | Peoples Republic of China
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the "Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and I, Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated:  May 6, 2011

/s/ MICHAEL I. GERMAN                                       
Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ FIROUZEH SARHANGI                                                                                 
Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 240 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Labor 

to prioritize the provision of services to homeless veterans with dependents in carrying out homeless veterans reintegration programs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2021 

Ms. BROWNLEY (for herself, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mrs. 

MCBATH, Ms. CHU, Ms. JACKSON LEE, and Mrs. RADEWAGEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Labor to prioritize the provision of services 

to homeless veterans with dependents in carrying out 

homeless veterans reintegration programs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Veterans 

5 with Children Reintegration Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 240 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRIORITY UNDER HOMELESS VETERANS RE2 INTEGRATION PROGRAMS FOR HOMELESS 

3 VETERANS WITH DEPENDENTS. 

4 (a) PRIORITY FOR HOMELESS VETERANS WITH DE5 PENDENT CHILDREN.—Subsection (a) of section 2021 of 

6 title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Subject to’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

8 Subject to’’; 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 

10 (5) as subparagraphs (A) through (E), respectively; 

11 and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(2) In conducting programs under this section, the 

15 Secretary shall prioritize the provision of services to home16 less veterans with dependents.’’. 

17 (b) ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Sub18 section (d) of such section is amended— 

19 (1) by striking ‘‘the report an evaluation of 

20 services’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘each 

21 such report—’’; and 

22 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(1) an evaluation of services furnished to vet24 erans under this section and an analysis of the infor25 mation collected under subsection (b); 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 240 IH

1 ‘‘(2) an analysis of any gaps in access to shel2 ter, safety, and services for homeless veterans with 

3 dependent children; and 

4 ‘‘(3) recommendations for improving any gaps 

5 identified under paragraph (2).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
RHODE ISLAND 

DEPARTMEN T OF ENVIRONMENTA L MANAGEMEN T 

235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908-5767 TDD 401-222-4462 

21 February 2014 

Mr. David B. Conroy, Chief of Programs Branch 

USEPA, Region 1 

Environmental Protection Agency 

5 Post Office Square - Suite 100 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

The Office of Air Resources (OAR) is hereby submitting the enclosed Air Pollution Control 

Regulation 49, entitled "Transportation Conformity" as a revision to the Rhode Island State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). 

The regulation became effective on 20 October 2011 and addresses the requirement to ensure 

that federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans, programs and projects that 

are consistent with the air quality goals established by Rhode Island's State Implementation Plan. 

A notice of intent to receive public comment concerning this regulation was issued on 15 July 

2011 to afford all interested parties the opportunity to submit comments in writing until 22 

August 2011. The notice of intent also gave the opportunity for a public hearing. A public 

hearing was not requested. Responses to comments received are included in the hearing officer's 

Decision document included as part of this submittal. 

The following support documents are included: 

1. A copy of the Notice of Public Comment Period signed 15 July 2011; 

2. An Affidavit of Publication/Posting from the Office of Secretary of State published 19 

July 2011 and a copy of the mailing list; 

3. A copy of the hearing officer's Decision; and 

4. A copy of the final Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 49. 

If you should have any questions, feel free to contact Frank Stevenson at 401-222-2808, ext 

7021. 

Sincerely, 

^ouglasMcVay, 

Office of Air R 

RIDEM 

Enclosure 

Cc: Anne Arnold, EPA Region 1 

30% post-consumer fiber
#### Edgar Carlton WORTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-764.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1969.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; William Clayton Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Lorenzo E. FLINT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 3, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Committee on Employee Benefits of the 
Federal Reserve System*.

Time and Date: 2:30 p.m., Tuesday, December 16, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Proposals relating to Federal Reserve System benefits.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassign-ments, and salary actions) involving individual Office of 
Employee Benefits employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

    * The Committee on Employee Benefits considers matters relating 
to the Retirement, Thrift, Long-Term Disability Income, and 
Insurance Plans for employees of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Person for More Information: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement of this 
meeting. (The Web site also includes procedural and other information 
about the meeting.)

    Dated: December 9, 1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32585 Filed 12-9-97; 2:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Jessie James GREEN, Appellant, v. Sherman ROSECRANTS et al., Appellees.

No. 73-566.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 12, 1974.

Fowler, White, Humkey, Burnett, Hurley & Banick and Gregor M. Gaebe, Miami, for appellant.

Adams, George, Wood, Schulte & Thompson, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Palmer v. R. S. Evans, Jacksonville, Inc., Fla.1955, 81 So.2d 63.5; Williams v. Davidson, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 387.
#### Arthur Lee MOORE and Willie Jackson v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 39206.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### COLLIER COUNTY PUBLISHING CO., INC., Appellant, v. Benjamin F. CHAPMAN, Appellee.

No. 74-67.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 22, 1974.

J. Dudley Goodlette, of Carroll, Vega, Brown & Nichols, P. A., Naples, for appellant.

Charles R. Holley, Naples, for appellee.

GRIMES, Judge.

The appellee obtained a judgment upon a jury verdict against appellant for $2,500 compensatory damages and $5,000 in punitive damages. The court denied appellant’s motion for judgment in accordance with motion for directed verdict but granted its motion for new trial on the issue of compensatory damages only, unless appellee filed a remittitur in the sum of $1,750. Appellee refused to file a remittitur, whereupon a date for the .new trial on compensatory damages has been set. In the meantime, appellant has appealed from the judgment.

Appellee now moves to quash the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In Zabawczuk v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., Fla.App. 2nd, 1964, 168 So.2d 150, this court held that where a new trial was ordered on the issue of damages only, this has the effect of making the prior judgment an interlocutory order. Since such an interlocutory order at law was not one from which an interlocutory appeal could be taken under FAR 4.2, 32 F.S.A., the appeal was dismissed.

The fact that the order granting a new trial in the instant case relates only to a portion of the damages represents a distinction without a difference. It is evident that matters remain open for determination in the lower court. Since the “final judgment” has become an interlocutory order *136by reason of the order granting a new trial on the issue of compensatory damages, this appeal must be dismissed. The appellant will have an opportunity to raise the points of which it complains in an appeal from a final judgment ultimately entered which is, in fact, final.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7601

CHARLES W. BARLOW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLARD L. HERRON, Sheriff of Randolph County,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 96-7604

CHARLES W. BARLOW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLARD L. HERRON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-56-2, CA-96-79-2)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2
3

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles W. Barlow, Appellant Pro Se. Rory L. Perry, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

This is a consolidated appeal in which the Appellant, a West

Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his two petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the records and the

district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals

on the reasoning of the district court. Barlow v. Herron, No. CA96-56-2 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 24, 1996); Barlow v. Herron, No. CA-96-

79-2 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED