41264 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Notices 

11See PCAST Report at 71. 

parties would be necessary to effectuate 

the Model City relationships and 

understandings between, for example, 

an industry consortium and the 

participating city? Beyond the FCC’s 

formal role in administering the 

experimental licensing process, NTIA 

and OET seek comment on how it could 

further expedite or streamline the 

process for Model City participants and 

more effectively ensure compliance 

with the rules and any license 

conditions. 

In addition to coordinating 

experimental license applications to use 

bands implicating federal spectrum 

assignments, to what extent should 

NTIA be involved in particular 

initiatives to facilitate federal agency 

participation in a Model City program? 

NTIA and OET seek input from 

commenting parties on whether the 

Model City program should be managed 

by the federal government or whether 

the FCC and NTIA could, on top of their 

existing licensing and coordination 

roles, help initiate and facilitate a 

dialogue between the key stakeholders 

who will directly develop, participate 

in, and benefit from a successful Model 

City program within the scope of 

existing rules or other requirements. 

The new CAC established by NTIA 

and NIST could be a potential vehicle 

to advance the Model City concept. As 

noted above, a core function of the CAC 

is to promote interdisciplinary research, 

development, and testing in radio 

frequency technology and spectrum 

sharing. NTIA and OET seek comment 

on the potential role of the CAC in 

managing the activities within one or 

more Model Cities, such as working 

directly with NTIA and the FCC to 

coordinate the interests of incumbent 

spectrum users to avoid harmful 

interference, while ensuring that 

innovators have access to adequate 

spectrum resources and other facilities 

in cooperation with city officials. While 

we would expect private sector 

stakeholders to drive the design and 

development of innovative wireless 

technologies and business models that 

could be tested in a Model City, NTIA 

and OET seek comment on how the 

CAC could work as an impartial 

facilitator with the federal and nonfederal stakeholders and local 

governments to develop feasible test 

plans, minimize regulatory issues and 

constraints, monitor experimental 

deployments, and evaluate and report 

the test results. 

The FCC’s experimental licensing 

program makes spectrum available to 

any non-federal party interested in 

experimenting with new radio 

technologies, equipment designs, radio 

wave propagation characteristics, and 

innovative service concepts (including 

market trials), especially in new 

innovation zones. NTIA and OET seek 

comment on how this program can be 

effectively used as a platform for the 

establishment of the Model City. For 

example, how can the FCC and NTIA 

facilitate stakeholder deployment of 

innovation zones in one or more Model 

Cities? 

NTIA and OET invite commenters to 

suggest opportunities for collaboration 

among wireless service providers, 

hardware vendors, academia, federal 

agencies, and other researchers and 

developers. How would such 

collaboration in a Model City better 

facilitate more rapid experimentation of 

advanced spectrum sharing techniques 

between new commercial systems and 

incumbent or new federal systems? How 

would such collaborative use within 

Model City innovation zones enhance 

stakeholders’ ability to try various 

sharing concepts? For example, what 

kind of flexibility would stakeholders 

need to make adjustments as needed 

when developing sharing protocols 

under real-world scenarios while 

ensuring protection of other services 

and operations? 

The host community for a Model City 

could play a crucial and collaborative 

role by expediting access to rights-ofway and other facilities (e.g., fiber, 

conduits, poles, towers, buildings, 

rooftops, park spaces, tunnels, etc.) for 

short- and long-term wireless 

infrastructure and monitoring 

deployments. The PCAST Report 

suggests that regional clusters of local 

industry associations, government, and 

academia could develop proposals to 

host the Model City in their particular 

regions to leverage their own innovation 

investments, local suppliers, terrain 

characteristics, nearby federal 

installations, and other unique features 

and benefits.11 NTIA and OET seek 

comment on the most appropriate 

approach for soliciting or identifying 

eligible cities interested in hosting 

Model City deployments. What 

particular factors, accommodations, 

commitments, or benefits would be 

important? For example, how should 

local permitting processes, accessibility 

to city lands and facilities, or incentives 

be considered? What features of a Model 

City would be most attractive for 

candidate cities to participate in the 

program? 

Finally, NTIA and OET seek input on 

the potential funding mechanisms and 

other processes for establishing and 

maintaining one or more Model City 

deployments in a manner that facilitates 

potentially resource-intensive 

collaborative efforts among a wide range 

of stakeholders while minimizing 

expenditure of taxpayer (both federal 

and local) dollars. How should funding 

be addressed in Model City proposals 

and what minimal commitments should 

be required for such proposals to go 

forward? How would existing 

mechanisms, such as federal 

Cooperative Research and Development 

Agreements, be used to expand 

opportunities for private stakeholder 

funding, collaboration, and information 

protection, and what other alternative 

methods could be used to formalize the 

parties’ roles and responsibilities, 

including funding? What incentives 

might be provided, and by whom, to 

increase participation in a Model City 

program? What other factors should be 

considered in a process to solicit 

interest in and successfully initiate 

Model City proposals? 

Dated: July 10, 2014. 

Milton Brown, 

Deputy Chief Counsel, National 

Telecommunications and Information 

Administration. 

Dated: July 10, 2014. 

Julius P. Knapp, 

Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology, 

Federal Communications Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–16529 Filed 7–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–60–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID DoD–2014–OS–0108] 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice to amend a System of 

Records. 

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency 

is amending a system of records notice 

S900.50, entitled ‘‘Labor Hours, Project 

and Workload Records’’ in its existing 

inventory of record systems subject to 

the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. 

The purpose of this system is to track 

contractor employees’ and military 

members’ workload/project activity for 

analysis and reporting purposes, time 

and attendance, and labor distribution 

data against projects for management 

and planning purposes; to maintain 

management records associated with the 

operations of the contract; to evaluate 

and monitor the contractor performance 

and other matters concerning the 

contract. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 15, 2014 / Notices 41265 

DATES: Comments will be accepted on or 

before August 14, 2014. This proposed 

action will be effective on the date 

following the end of the comment 

period unless comments are received 

which result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by any of the following methods: 

* Federal Rulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

* Mail: Federal Docket Management 

System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 

East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, 

Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number for this Federal Register 

document. The general policy for 

comments and other submissions from 

members of the public is to make these 

submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

LaDonne White, DLA FOIA/Privacy Act 

Office, Headquarters, Defense Logistics 

Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. 

Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, 

VA 22060–6221, or by phone at 

(703)767–5045. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Defense Logistics Agency systems of 

records notices subject to the Privacy 

Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 

have been published in the Federal 

Register and are available from the 

address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT or at http://dpclo.defense.gov/. 

The proposed changes to the record 

system being amended are set forth in 

this notice. The proposed amendment is 

not within the purview of subsection (r) 

of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 

552a), as amended, which requires the 

submission of a new or altered system 

report. 

Dated: July 10, 2014. 

Aaron Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

S900.50 

SYSTEM NAME: 

Labor Hours, Project and Workload 

Records (March 4, 2011, 76 FR 12076). 

CHANGES: 

* * * * * 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

Delete ‘‘Suite 6226’’ and replace with 

‘‘Suite 1318.’’ 

* * * * * 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

Delete from entry ‘‘and office 

telephone number.’’ 

* * * * * 

PURPOSE(S): 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘For the 

purpose of tracking contractor 

employees’ and military members’ 

workload/project activity for analysis 

and reporting purposes, time and 

attendance, and labor distribution data 

against projects for management and 

planning purposes; to maintain 

management records associated with the 

operations of the contract; to evaluate 

and monitor the contractor performance 

and other matters concerning the 

contract.’’ 

* * * * * 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Replace ‘‘Project Manager’’ with 

‘‘EAGLE Project Manager.’’ 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘Individuals seeking to determine 

whether information about themselves 

is contained in this system of records 

should address written inquiries to the 

DLA FOIA/Privacy Act Office, 

Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency, 

ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman 

Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, VA 

22060–6221. 

Inquiry should contain the subject 

individual’s full name, User ID or DLA 

email address, return mailing address, 

and organizational location of the 

individual.’’ 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘Individuals seeking access to 

information about themselves contained 

in this system of records should address 

written inquiries to the DLA FOIA/

Privacy Act Office, Headquarters, 

Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DGA, 

8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, 

Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–6221. 

Inquiry should contain the subject 

individual’s full name, User ID or DLA 

email address, return mailing address, 

and organizational location of the 

individual.’’ 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘The 

DLA rules for accessing records, for 

contesting contents, and appealing 

initial agency determinations are 

contained in 32 CFR part 323, or may 

be obtained from the DLA FOIA/Privacy 

Act Office, Headquarters, Defense 

Logistics Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 

John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort 

Belvoir, VA 22060–6221.’’ 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–16516 Filed 7–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID DoD–2014–OS–0109] 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: Defense Health Agency, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice to alter a System of 

Records. 

SUMMARY: The Defense Health Agency 

proposes to alter an existing system of 

records, EDHA 18, entitled ‘‘Research 

Regulatory Oversight Records’’ in its 

inventory of record systems subject to 

the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. 

This system provides information to 

track research protocols to ensure the 

protection of human and animal 

subjects in the conduct of DoDsupported research and to ensure that 

individuals engaged in the performance 

of DoD-supported research are properly 

trained and qualified. 

DATES: Comments will be accepted on or 

before August 14, 2014. This proposed 

action will be effective on the day 

following the end of the comment 

period unless comments are received 

which result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by any of the following methods: 

* Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

* Mail: Federal Docket Management 

System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 

East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, 

Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number for this Federal Register 

document. The general policy for 

comments and other submissions from 

members of the public is to make these 

submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Linda S. Thomas, Chief, Defense Health 

Agency Privacy and Civil Liberties 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES