alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Schofield, Ashleigh (OST) To: Gertel, Angelica (OST) Subject: FW: Act Now to Preserve US Jobs and Aircraft Safety! Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 2:34:35 PM

-----Original Message----- From: joewieslander@cs.com [ mailto:joewieslander@cs.com ] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 11:51 AM To: Anthony Foxx (OST) Subject: Act Now to Preserve US Jobs and Aircraft Safety!
Joe Wieslander 1620 west moody trl phoenix, AZ 85041-9127
May 26, 2015 Anthony Foxx Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590
Dear Anthony Foxx: Dear Secretary Foxx, I am writing to ask you to deny Norwegian Air International's application for foreign air carrier certification. As a flight attendant at American Airlines, I am concerned about NAI's proposed business model. NAI has made no secret of their intention to operate as a "flag of convenience" carrier in violation of the spirit of the US-EU Open Skies agreement. If its application is approved, NAI will:

* Threaten the labor standards of all carriers operating in the transatlantic market, the busiest aviation market in the world;

* Trigger a race to the bottom among airlines on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean in order to compete with NAI's low-cost outsourced flight crews; and

* Create significant security risks by allowing flight crews without proper screening unfettered access to secure areas our in American airports. Protect the labor standards of airline workers in the United States and Europe. Do not set a precedent for carriers to operate under a flag of convenience. Please deny NAI's application. Sincerely, Sincerely,

Joe Wieslander phoenix
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP






                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Stockholders and the
   Board of Directors of
   JSB Financial, Inc.:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement (Nos.
33-37217,  33-36491  and  33-36490)  on Form S-8 of JSB  Financial,  Inc. of our
report  dated  January 30,  1997,  relating to the  consolidated  statements  of
financial  condition of JSB  Financial,  Inc. and  subsidiary as of December 31,
1996 and 1995,  and the related  consolidated  statements of income,  changes in
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year
period ended December 31, 1996, which report is incorporated by reference to the
December 31, 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K of JSB  Financial,  Inc. Our report
included  an  explanatory  paragraph  that  described  the  adoption  of  a  new
accounting principle as discussed in the notes to those statements.




                              KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Jericho, New York
March 26, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-86-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Section 4 Filing

December 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 10, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (Koch Gateway), tendered for filing a section 4 filing 
pertaining to the termination of gathering services associated with the 
abandonment of South Texas facilities granted in FERC Docket No. CP97-
337-001.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Koch Gateway Pipeline Co., 81 FERC para.61,228 (1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Koch Gateway proposes no changes to its published tariff therefore 
no revised tariff sheets are included in this filing. Koch Gateway 
filed with the Commission a list of gathering customers affected by the 
abandonment.
    Any persons desiring to be heard or to make any protest this filing 
should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedures. All such motions or protests should be 
filed as provided by Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protest will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not served to make protestants 
parties at the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32985 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of The Fresh Market, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Craig Carlock, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Lisa Klinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    LISA
KLINGER    
|Lisa Klinger           
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|March 22, 2011
#### James A. LITTLE and Sammie Finalle Nail, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. O-253, O-254.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 22, 1971.

Fleet & Stone, Hollywood, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments of the lower court are affirmed.

JOHNSON, C J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02784

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 02784\02784_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02784\02784_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

02784\02784_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02784\02784_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02784\02784_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02784\02784_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02784\02784_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02784\02784_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

02784\Certification Statement_02784.pdf Plant certification statement

02784\Supporting Documentation\02784_Final EPA Copy-Bay Shore-Part A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02784\Supporting Documentation\02784_Final EPA Copy-Bay Shore-Part A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02784\Supporting Documentation\02784_Final EPA Copy-Bay Shore-Part D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database .
February 24, 2014

Exemption No. 10945

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-1017

Mr. Rodney M. Cotter

Aircraft Program Director,

St. Philip’s College-Southwest Campus

1800 Quintana Road

San Antonio, TX, 78211

Dear Mr. Cotter:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It 

transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and 

limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 19, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) on behalf of St. Philip’s College (SPC) for an exemption from

§ 65.75(a) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if 

granted, would permit SPC to administer the Aviation Mechanic General (AMG)

written test to students immediately following successful completion of the general

curriculum, prior to meeting the experience requirements of 14 CFR § 65.77.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of 

the petition in the Federal Register. The requested exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to St. 

Phillip’s.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in similar circumstancesto those presented in

your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 6569 (copy enclosed), the FAA agrees that 

testing immediately after learning is a universally accepted instructional principal that 

reinforces learning. Therefore, we grant the petitioner permission to test students

immediately after successfully completing the general curriculum, but before meeting

the requirements of § 65.77.

AFS-14-069-E
Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that –

1. They do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioners of similar 

grants of exemption;

2. The reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemptions also

apply to the situation you present; and

3. A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

 Our Decision

Under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition to administer the AMG written

test to students immediately following successful completion of the general curriculum,

before meeting the experience requirements of § 65.77.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Before exercising the privileges of this exemption, St. Phillip’s must

provide its operations manual to its certificate holding district office

(CHDO) and receive approval of the operations manual from the CHDO.

2. Before retesting after failure, St. Philip’s College must require a student to 

repeat the entire instructional unit associated with the failed test and 

receive authorization from St. Philip’s College to retake the test. St. 

Philip’s College must contain procedures in its manual for documenting

and tracking compliance with all retesting procedures.

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2016, unless sooner superseded

or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
Treasury approves Utah’s plan to invest $9.8 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Utah

 

▪ Program Summary: $9.8 million for Broadband Infrastructure (7% of CPF allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 3,080 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: The Utah Rural Last Mile Broadband 

Grant Program is a competitive grant program designed to

deploy high-speed broadband to households 

and businesses in rural and economically distressed areas 

across the state. The program is an initiative of the Utah 

Broadband Center, which works with many nonprofit and

government agencies, tribal groups, healthcare and educational organizations, and ISPs 

throughout the state to bring service to areas where broadband infrastructure projects would 

not be feasible without assistance.

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

▪ Key State Contact: The Utah Broadband Center

Utah Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Utah, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~5% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000024148
[NAME] CONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LTD
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
[CASH]                                          306127                  306127
[SECURITIES]                                         0                       0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0                       0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0                       0
[INVENTORY]                                          0                       0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                 12366                   12366
[PP&E]                                               0                       0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                  318493                  318493
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           288046                  288046
[BONDS]                                              0                       0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0                       0
[PREFERRED]                                          0                       0
[COMMON]                                             0                       0
[OTHER-SE]                                       30447                   30447
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                    318493                  318493
[SALES]                                        5404347                 5538296
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               5404347                 5538296
[CGS]                                                0                       0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   171037                  357746
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                250000                  250000
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0                       0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0                       0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                4983310                 4930550
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0                       0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            4983310                 4930550
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0                       0
[CHANGES]                                            0                       0
[NET-INCOME]                                   4983310                 4930550
[EPS-BASIC]                                   157.78                  156.11
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   157.78                  156.11
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Sino Agro Food, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee Yip Kun Solomon, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ LEE YIP KUN SOLOMONLee Yip Kun SolomonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 Bank of
America, N.A., as Trustee
 for the
Hugoton Royalty Trust:
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-81849 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc. of our report dated February 22,
2010, with respect to the statements of assets, liabilities, and trust
corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Hugoton Royalty Trust.
 
 
 
 
 KPMG
LLP
 
 Fort
Worth, Texas
 February
22, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-07-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1997
<CASH>                                           1,155
<SECURITIES>                                     8,662
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                       403
<INVENTORY>                                     18,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,331
<PP&E>                                         231,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,866
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         6,913
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,674
<SALES>                                         70,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,174
<CGS>                                           12,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,827)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,416 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,411)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,411)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.20)
        










<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### Aaron T. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-41.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 13, 1972.

W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

In this case appellant Aaron T. Thomas was informed against in the Hillsborough County Court of Record for the offense of robbery. Upon plea of not guilty he was tried before a jury, was convicted, and was sentenced to serve a sentence of 99 years in the State Prison. Notice of Appeal was filed to review said conviction, but thereafter the local Public Defender, appointed by the Court to represent him on the appeal, filed in this Court his brief on behalf of Thomas wherein he states he has “examined the Record for any . . . error which might exist, but has been unable to find any which might arguably support an appeal”, and he therefore requests that he be allowed to withdraw as counsel for appellant “on the grounds that this is a frivolous appeal”, citing Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 and Sears v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 237 So.2d 837.

Thereafter, this Court, on July 26, 1972, entered order herein, reciting that copy of said brief had been served upon Thomas, and giving him 30 days from said date, if he so desired, to file an additional brief calling this Court’s attention to any matters which he feels should be considered in connection with the appeal in this cause. Pursuant to appellant’s request, this Court granted him additional time within which to file an additional brief. Said time has now expired and no such additional brief has been received or filed.

We have, however, in fairness to appellant Thomas, examined the entire record diligently but have been unable to find any error or irregularity in the proceedings of the trial court that would justify or warrant reversal of the judgment appealed.

The judgment of conviction is therefore—

Affirmed.

LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


              [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

                                March 30, 2001


Hugoton Royalty Trust
P.O. Box 830650
Dallas, TX 75283-0650


     Re:  Hugoton Royalty Trust
          2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Gentlemen:

     The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and to
the use of its report dated March 29, 2001, regarding the Hugoton Royalty Trust
Proved Reserves and Future net Revenue as of January 1, 2001, in the 2000 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

     Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in the Hugoton Royalty Trust or in
any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest
as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise
connected with Hugoton Royalty Trust. We are not employed by Hugoton Royalty
Trust on a contingent basis.


                                                  Yours very truly,


                                                  MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


                                                  By /s/JAMES C. PEARSON
                                                     --------------------
                                                     James C. Pearson
                                                     President
# Non-UGLG Distribution Bulk Uplo