alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000861063
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM IV - SERIES 5, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         21685
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  51558
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               76035
<PP&E>                                         2205847
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1914024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 367858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          66478
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     301379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   367858
<SALES>                                        315919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315919
<CGS>                                          262851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  287418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               24567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   28501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
4.86


 


Summary
of the Private Instrument of First Amendment to Commitment to Purchase and Sale of Real Property, entered into on May 6, 2021, in connection
with Fazenda Jatobá.


 


Parties:
Imobiliária Jaborandi Ltda., as Seller; John Kudiess and Harald Kudiess, as Buyers; and Jaborandi Agrícola Ltda. as
intervening-consenting party.


 


Purpose: Amend
the Private Instrument of Commitment to Purchase and Sale of Real Property, entered into on May 6, 2021, in connection with the sale
of 1,250 arable hectares of Fazenda Jatobá, in order to (i) formalize the composition of the area under such transaction
of 1,654.20 hectares; (ii) formalize that the purchase price, in Brazilian national currency (Reais), is equivalent to 376,060
bags of soybeans; and (iii) state that John Kudiess and Harald Kudiess will be vested in the property after the payment of 50% of the
first installment of the purchase price.
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications

I, David F. Pope, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 24, 2010

/s/ DAVID F. POPE David F. Pope President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 246 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 246

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 180 West Main Street in Abingdon, Virginia, as the ``H. Emory 
     Widener, Jr., Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2021

 Mr. Griffith introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 180 West Main Street in Abingdon, Virginia, as the ``H. Emory 
     Widener, Jr., Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 180 
West Main Street in Abingdon, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``H. Emory Widener, Jr., Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``H. Emory Widener, Jr., Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
TALKING POINTS 

FOR THE 

FINANCING PRESS CONFERENCE 

JANUARY 30, 1991 

Today we are announcing the terms of our regular February 

quarterly refunding. I will also discuss the Treasury's 

financing requirements for the balance of the current calendar 

quarter and our estimated cash needs for the April-June 1991 

quarter. 

1. We are offering $34.5 billion of notes and bonds to 

refund $17.3 billion of privately-held notes maturing on February 

15 and to raise approximately $17.2 billion of cash. The three 

securities are: 

--First, a 3-year note in the amount of $12.5 billion, 

maturing on February 15, 1994. This note is scheduled to 

be auctioned on a yield basis on Tuesday, February 5. 

The minimum denomination will be $5,000. 

--Second, a lo-year note in the amount of $11.0 billion, 

maturing on February 15, 2001. This note is scheduled to 

be auctioned on a yield basis on Wednesday, February 6. 

The minimum denomination will be $1,000. 

--Third, a 30-year bond in the amount of $11.0 billion, 

maturing February 15, 2021. This bond is scheduled to be 

auctioned on a yield basis on Thursday, February 7. The 

minimum denomination will be $1,000. 
-2- 

2. We will accept noncompetitive tenders up to $1,000,000 

for each of the note and bond auctions. 

3. For the current January-March quarter, we estimate a net 

market borrowing need of $64 billion, which includes Treasury 

borrowing to finance Resolution Trust Corporation operations. 

The estimate assumes a $20 billion cash balance at the end of 

March. We may want to have a higher balance, depending upon our 

assessment of cash needs at the time. 

Including this refunding we will have raised $43.7 billion 

of the $64 billion in net market borrowing needed this JanuaryMarch quarter. This net borrowing was accomplished as follows: 

-- $3.6 billion of cash from the 7-year note that settled 

January 15; 

-- $12.3 billion of cash from the 2- and 5-year notes which 

settle tomorrow; 

-- $8.4 billion of cash in regular weekly bills, including 

the bills announced yesterday; 

-- $2.2 billion of cash in 52-week bills; 

-- $17.2 billion of cash from the refunding issues announced 

today t 

The $20.3 billion to be raised in the rest of the JanuaryMarch quarter could be accomplished through sales of regular 

13-,260, and 52-week bills, and 2-year and 5-year notes at the 

end of February. Since March 31 is a Sunday, the 2-year and 5- 

year notes to be auctioned at the end of March will settle April 

1 and do not affect our borrowing for this quarter. 
-3- 

4. We estimate Treasury net market borrowing needs to be in 

the range of $30 to $35 billion for the April-June 1991 quarter, 

assuming a $30 billion cash balance on June 30. The Treasury's 

April-June borrowing estimate includes an allowance for 

Resolution Trust Corporation activities. 

5. The 10-year notes and 30-year bonds announced today will 

be eligible for conversion to STRIPS (Separate Trading of 

Registered Interest and Principal of Securities) and, 

accordingly, may be divided into separate interest and principal 

components.
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Oct - Dec

2015 Actual 212 354 (7) 347 135 333 0

Jan - Mar

2016 Actual 266 244 3 247 (20) 314 0

Apr - Jun

2016 Actual (60) (25) 14 (10) 50 364 0

Jul - Sep

2016 Actual 234 222 2 224 (10) 353 0

Oct - Dec

2016 Actual 201 255 (8) 246 46 399 0

Jan - Mar

2017 Actual 335 40 (12) 28 (307) 92 0

Apr - Jun

2017 Actual (75) 35 (22) 14 89 181 0

Jul - Sep

2017 Actual 192 189 (19) 170 (22) 159 0

Oct - Dec

2017 Actual 204 282 (8) 274 70 229 (12)

Jan - Mar

2018 Actual 374 488 (54) 435 61 290 (30)

Apr - Jun

2018 Actual (43) 72 (72) 0 43 333 (48)

Jul - Sep

2018 Actual 212 353 (89) 264 52 385 (66)

Oct - Dec

2018 Actual 291 426 (117) 309 17 402 (91)

Jan - Mar

2019 Actual 375 374 (67) 306 (68) 334 (46)

Apr - Jun April 29, 2019 (8) 30 (102) (72) (64) 270 (67)

2019 Actual 13 40 (97) (57) (70) 264 (67)

Forecast Revisions 21 10 5 15 (6) (6) 0

Jul - Sep April 29, 2019 259 160 (86) 74 (185) 85 (58)

2019 July 29, 2019 272 433 (75) 358 86 350 (58)

Forecast Revisions 13 274 10 284 271 265 (0)

Oct - Dec

2019 July 29, 2019 310 381 (10) 370 60 410 0

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
Exhibit
4.81


 


Summary
of the Private Instrument of Fiduciary Transfer of Real State Property, entered into on March 3, 2021, in connection with Fazenda Rio
do Meio.


 


Parties:
Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuária Ltda., as the owner of the land; CIBRASEC Companhia Brasileira de Securitização,
as beneficiaries; and Brasilagro Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas as intervening-consenting party.


 


Purpose: 
The granting of a Fiduciary Transfer of Real State Property of 264,1624 hectares of Fazenda Rio
do Meio, which were given as collateral in order to secure, jointly with other assets previously designated as collateral, the fulfillment
of obligations under the agribusiness receivables certificates (Certificados de Recebíveis do Agronegócio) issued
in May 2018 in the aggregate amount of R$142,200,000.00, of which R$85,200,00.00 in the first series and R$57,000,000.00 in the second
series. The first series will mature on August 1, 2022, subject to interest corresponding to 106.5% of the DI Rate, and the second series
will mature on July 31, 2023, subject to interest corresponding to 110.0% of the DI Rate.
Document

Exhibit 10(iii)A(83)



AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into as of October 25, 2021, by and between ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”) and Dianne S. Mills (“Executive”);


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into a Severance Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2020 (the “Severance Agreement”), providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Severance Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:


1.Section 4.2 is hereby amended by deleting “75%” from clause (i) and substituting “100%” in lieu thereof.


2.This Amendment to the Severance Agreement shall be effective as of the date of this Amendment.  Except as hereby modified, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
            
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date(s) written below.






												
	EXECUTIVE		COMPANY
			
			ACUITY BRANDS, INC.
	/s/ DIANNE S. MILLS		By:	/s/ NEIL M. ASHE
	DIANNE S. MILLS			NEIL M. ASHE
				Chairman, President and
				Chief Executive Officer
				


1
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                               SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Sylvan Inc., a Nevada corporation, has the domestic and international
subsidiaries listed below. All are wholly owned except as noted. Certain
international subsidiaries are not named because they are not significant in the
aggregate. Sylvan Inc. has no parent.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       State/Country of Incorporation
<S>                                                    <C>
Quincy Corporation                                               Florida
Somycel S.A.                                                     France
Sylvan Africa (Pty) Ltd.                                         South Africa
Sylvan America, Inc.                                             Nevada
Sylvan America, Inc.                                             Pennsylvania
Sylvan Bioproducts, Inc.                                         Pennsylvania
Sylvan Communications, Inc.                                      California
Sylvan Denmark                                                   Denmark
Sylvan Export Corporation                                        Barbados
Sylvan Foods, Inc.                                               Pennsylvania
Sylvan Foods (France) S.A.                                       France
Sylvan Foods (Netherlands) B.V.                                  the Netherlands
Sylvan Holdings Pty Ltd. (a)                                     Australia
Sylvan Horst B.V. (b)                                            the Netherlands
Sylvan Hungaria Kft.                                             Hungary
Sylvan Hungary Compost Producing and Trading Ltd.                Hungary
Sylvan Ireland                                                   Ireland
Sylvan Italia S.r.l.                                             Italy
Sylvan Nederlands B.V.                                           the Netherlands
Sylvan Pilz AG                                                   Switzerland
Sylvan Spawn Canada, Ltd.                                        Canada
Sylvan Polska Sp. z.o.o.                                         Poland
Sylvan Spawn Laboratory Hungary Ltd.                             Hungary
Sylvan Spawn Limited                                             England
Sylvan Tarim Urunleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi (c)      Turkey
Tartarin S.A.                                                    France
White Queen Ltd.                                                 England
</TABLE>


---------------------------
(a)    49% ownership
(b)    75% ownership
(c)    60% ownership


                                       61
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
June 30, 1999 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statements of
income, reinvested earnings and cash flows for the six-month period ended
06/30/99 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                             3,254
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    152,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       6,750
<INVENTORY>                                                      189,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 373,587
<PP&E>                                                         3,694,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 1,110,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 3,581,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            237,242
<BONDS>                                                          993,000
<COMMON>                                                          90,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     1,256,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   3,581,373
<SALES>                                                          894,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 894,352
<CGS>                                                            776,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    776,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                41,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   40,084
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      16,034
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               24,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      24,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.27


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-20280

Summary Calendar

_____________________

SHIRLEY J. LEWIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

THE CITY OF HOUSTON; THE CITY

OF HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellees, 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No.CA-H-96-4240

October 27, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shirley J. Lewis, pro se, appeals the summary judgment granted

the City of Houston, dismissing her claims under the Americans with

Disabilities Act (ADA). We AFFIRM.

Lewis, who was employed by the City as a senior data entry

operator, was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus in the

early 1990s; her last day at work was 27 February 1994. She
-2-

applied for long term disability benefits (LTD) on 15 August 1994.

On 3 November 1995, Lewis filed a charge of discrimination under

the ADA with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The City

terminated Lewis’s employee benefits on 1 October 1996.

The City moved for summary judgment, asserting that Lewis’s

claims of harassment and refusal to accommodate were time barred;

and that Lewis was estopped from claiming she was a “qualified

individual” under the ADA, because of her representations on

applications for LTD and Social Security Disability that she is

totally disabled. Summary judgment was granted for the City. 

Lewis maintains that the district court erred in finding that

her claims were time barred because there was continuing

discrimination; and that material fact issues exist.

Of course, we review a summary judgment de novo, applying the

same standard as the district court. E.g., Freeman v. County of

Bexar, 142 F.3d 848, 850 (5th Cir. 1998). Summary judgment is

proper where there is no material fact issue and the movant is

entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id.; see FED. R. CIV. P.

56(c).

Having reviewed the record and the briefs, we AFFIRM the

summary judgment for essentially the reasons stated by the district

court. See Lewis v. City of Houston, No. 4:96-CV-04240, slip op.

at 3-6 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 19, 1997).

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41361 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE DE LA CRUZ-CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-819-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose De La Cruz-Camacho appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. De La Cruz-Camacho complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. De La Cruz-Camacho thus contends that hisNo. 02-41361 -2- sentence should not exceed the maximum terms of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. De La Cruz-Camacho acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.