alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) ON PAGES 3 THROUGH 9 OF THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998, AND IS QUALLIFIED IN IT'S ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,965
<SECURITIES>                                     825
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,899
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,022
<PP&E>                                         3,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                   565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            628
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0 
<PREFERRED>                                        5
<COMMON>                                       3,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12,386
<SALES>                                          128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 197
<CGS>                                            194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (9)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (388) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.06) 
        


</TABLE>
#### Ira BLOOM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-791.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 5, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Stephen Rosin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was begun as a petition for habeas corpus and a delayed appeal was granted pursuant to holding in Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239. Appellant alleges, and the record substantiates his allegation, that at the time of the entry of his guilty plea, the prosecuting attorney stated that the maximum sentence under the charge was five years. The court accepted the statement of the assistant state attorney, and in questions directed to the appellant stated that if the guilty plea were accepted, the sentence would in all probability be for the maximum of five years. Appellant was sentenced to fifteen years.

Appellant did not ask in the trial court to have his plea set aside. We therefore hold that this is an appeal from an illegal sentence. A sentence of fifteen years, where the defendant has been led to believe that he will receive only five years if he enters his guilty plea, clearly cannot stand. See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); United States v. Blair, 470 F.2d 331 (5th Cir. 1972), and Fla.Stat. § 810.04, and § *129775.082, F.S.A. Therefore, the sentence this cause is amended to read “. that you be imprisoned by confinement at hard labor in the STATE PENITENTIARY for a term of Five (5) years, credit to be given for time served in the Dade County Jail prior to sentencing, to-wit: One Hundred Forty-Six (146) days”.' The sentence as amended is affirmed. in

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated May 30, 2014 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NGL Energy Partners LP and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2014. Our report is included in the Amended Annual Report of SemGroup Corporation on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2013. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of SemGroup Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-170968 and 333-189905), Form S-3 (File No. 333-185649) and Form S-4 (File No. 333-193005).

 
| /s/   GRANT THORNTON LLP |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| Tulsa,   Oklahoma        |   |
| May   30, 2014           |   |

 

----
#### Larry William HASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-333.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### HART v. NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC.

No. 38393.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 217 So.2d 900.
#### Angelina Scurry MANOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-473.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 6, 1973.

Raymond L. Syfrett, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Hanemann v. State (Fla.App.1969), 221 So.2d 228; Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966).

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jose Gonzalez, * From the 299th District

 Court of Travis County,

 Trial Court No. D-1-DC-07-301684.

Vs. No. 11-12-00027-CR * January 9, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
256 La. 361

#### J. V. BRASWELL et al. v. H. J. HEARTWELL et al.

No. 50606.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1970.

In re: Carl L. Morris and Continental-Emsco Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 234 So.2d 197.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error in the judgment complained of.
---

Exhibit 32.1





Certification pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Edward J. Geletka, President and Chief Executive Officer and L. Joseph Stella, III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Colonial Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and that to the best of their knowledge:





1.
the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










April 28, 2011

/s/ Edward J. GeletkaDate

Edward J. GeletkaPresident and Chief Executive Officer






April 28, 2011

/s/ L. Joseph Stella, IIIDate

L. Joseph Stella, IIIExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer







The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Colonial Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by Colonial Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, John P. Hickey, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. for theyear ended December 31, 2005;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: July 18, 2007 By: /s/ John P. Hickey, Jr.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996    
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1996    
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996    
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1    
<CASH>                                            2,649    
<SECURITIES>                                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,736    
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0    
<INVENTORY>                                       5,455    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11,420    
<PP&E>                                        2,760,088    
<DEPRECIATION>                                  429,318    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,868,920    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           697,431    
<BONDS>                                               0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0    
<PREFERRED>                                           0    
<COMMON>                                      5,463,025    
<OTHER-SE>                                   (5,600,696)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,868,920    
<SALES>                                         614,921    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                614,921    
<CGS>                                            41,156    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   486,345    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              240,380    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (111,804)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (111,804)   
<DISCONTINUED>                                   24,686    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0    
<CHANGES>                                             0    
<NET-INCOME>                                    (87,118)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.01)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.01)   
                                            


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of MEMS USA, INC. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),  I, Lawrence  Weisdorn,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify to
the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and,

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Lawrence Weisdorn
_________________________________
Lawrence Weisdorn
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2004

This  certification  is being  furnished  solely to  accompany  this Form 10-QSB
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  and is not being  filed for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and is not to be
incorporated   by  reference   into  any  filing  of  the  Company  unless  such
incorporation is expressly referenced therein.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Lisa Klinger, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Fresh Market, Inc.;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Lisa Klinger

Lisa Klinger

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: April 25, 2011
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Weikang Bio-Technology Group Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Baolin Sun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: March 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Baolin SunBaolin Sun

Chief Financial Officer
#### Jose A. CABRERA et al., Appellants, v. INDUSTRIAL FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 77-380.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 16, 1978.

Lawrence D. Faye, Coral Gables, and Thomas G. Sherman, Miami, for appellants.

Goodhart & Rosner, Greene & Cooper and Sharon L. Wolfe, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.,*419 U.S. 345, 95 S.Ct. 449, 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974); *Avila South Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kappa Corporation,*347 So.2d 599 (Fla.1976); *Frankel v. City of Miami Beach,*340 So.2d 463 (Fla.1977); *Nichols v. Miami Burglar Alarm Co.,*339 So.2d 175 (Fla.1976); *Canal Authority v. Ocala Manufacturing Ice & Packing Co.,*332 So.2d 321 (Fla.1976); *Thompkins v. Metropolitan Dade County,*345 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. Fuller,*275 So.2d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); *Werley v. State,*271 So.2d 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); and *Curtis Publishing Co. v. Bader,*266 So.2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2425 

To authorize a National Poverty Research Center. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Mr. POCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To authorize a National Poverty Research Center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Poverty Re5 search Center Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL POVERTY RESEARCH CENTER. 

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Health and 

8 Human Services shall award, every 5 years, one or more 

9 5-year grants or cooperative agreements with institutions 

10 of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the 

11 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))) to 

12 operate one or more National Poverty Research Centers. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2425 IH

1 (b) RESEARCH.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—National Poverty Research 

3 Centers shall perform poverty policy research, pov4 erty policy research training, and poverty policy re5 search dissemination. 

6 (2) COLLABORATION.—National Poverty Re7 search Centers shall coordinate formal networks in 

8 order to facilitate a sustainable, nationwide infra9 structure of poverty policy researchers and to better 

10 inform public policies that seek to reduce poverty 

11 and its effects in the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Emailing: 2007.bmp

Ralph DeSiena to: Cleveland Holladay 11/10/2011 04:57 PM

1 attachment

2007.bmp

 

2007 Met
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                            SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) (the
"Report") by Cash Systems, Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Christopher D. Larson, the
Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

               1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

               2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: March 16, 2006                  By: /s/ Christopher D. Larson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Christopher D. Larson
                                       Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### MERCANTILE CREDIT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. W. B. DUNN CO., INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 43724.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 275 So.2d 311.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Walton A. DRAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-81.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 3, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 100 SSM 4 The People &c., Respondent, v. Jeffrey Mercado, Appellant.

Submitted by Claudia Flores, for appellant. Submitted by Allen J. Vickey, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determinations regarding founded suspicion of criminality justifying a request to search the car, and then the trunk, and defendant's consent to a search of the vehicle, all involve mixed questions of law and fact. The determinations are supported by - 1 -- 2 - No. SSM 4 the record, and are beyond further review (see People v Valerio , 95 NY2d 924, 925 [2000]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur. Decided March 26, 2015

- 2 -
#### UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND BONDING CO. v. BUTLER.

No. 38191.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.