alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# OAR Box 1168 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 126 ) ll-C-4 1 Docket Number: 

# A-89-1 0

Printed 4/29/2008 11:23:21 AM Sheet 126 of 131 p. 1

# A-89-1 0 P. 2 II-C-4 1
AP RI2 199 1

Mr . Nei lSager s Thioko l Corporatio n P . 0 . BOX 689M/S30 1 Brigha mCity , Uta h84302-068 9 Dea r Mr . Sagers : Confirming you r recen t request , w e ar e enclosing a cop yo f th e Marc h6 , 199 1 Federa l Registe r notic e concernin g th e negotiate d regulatio n fo r equipmen t leaks . Pleas e contac t u s i f w e ma yb e o f furthe r assistance . Sincerely , Ja n Meye r Standard s Developmen t Branc h Enclosur e bcc : /Ua n Meye r

ESD:SDB:JMeyer:Stevens:FT S 629-5254:MD-13(NCMutual):04-12-9 1P. 3

Vol . 56 , No . 44 , Marc h6 , 1991 , Nationa l Emissio nStandard s fo r Hazardous . Ai r Pollutants ; Announcemen t o f Negotiate d Regulatio nfo r Equipmen t Leaks .



# THI S DOCUMEN TI S IDENTICA L T O DOCKETITEM : 

# tf-ry/r> 3zr

-j- //

.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



/s/ Cheryl W. Grisé

(Signature)

Cheryl W. Grisé

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ David R. McHale

(Signature)

David R. McHale

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



August 8, 2005





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                             CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three Months Ended June 30        Six Months Ended June 30
                                             2001             2000             2001             2000
                                             ----             ----             ----             ----
<S>                                       <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Computation of share totals used in
 computing earnings per share:

Weighted average number
 of shares outstanding                    18,848,149       18,839,766       18,852,698       18,813,244

Basic average shares
 a-Outstanding                            18,848,149       18,839,766       18,852,698       18,813,244

Incremental shares
 arising, from out-
 standing stock
 options                                      41,216          132,536           42,579          127,387
                                         -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------

 b-Totals                                 18,889,365       18,972,302       18,895,297       18,940,631
                                         ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

c-Net Income                             $ 3,754,576      $ 4,862,278      $ 5,104,089      $10,156,899
                                         ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

Net Income Per Share
 Basic - c/a                             $      0.20      $      0.26      $      0.27      $      0.54
                                         ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

Net Income Per Share
assuming full dilution c/b               $      0.20      $      0.26      $      0.27      $      0.54
                                         ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.10**

**SemGroup Corporation**

**Equity Incentive Plan**

**AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT**

This Amendment No. 2 (this “**Amendment**”) to that certain Restricted Stock Award Agreement (the “**Agreement**”) dated                    , 2010, by and between SemGroup Corporation, a Delaware corporation (with any successor, the “**Company**”),and                      (the “**Participant**”) is adopted and approved by the Company to be effective as of                    , 2011. 

RECITAL: 

WHEREAS, theCompany has determined that it is in its best interest and that of the Participant to accelerate the vesting of a portion of the Restricted Shares granted pursuant to the Agreement upon the occurrence of certain events; 

NOW THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Agreement as follows: 

1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement unlessotherwise defined herein. 

2. Authority of Company to Amend. This Amendment is adopted and approved by the Companywithout the consent of the Participant under the authority granted pursuant to Section 18 of the Agreement. 

3.Vesting of Restricted Stock. Section 3(d) of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following revised Section 3(d) and the new Section 3(e) as set forth below: 

(d) Involuntary Termination of Service. If the Participant’s Service is involuntarily terminated by theCompany without Cause or terminated by the Company without Cause as the result of a divestiture, then any Restricted Shares scheduled to vest on the first vesting date next following such termination of Service shall instead become fully vested uponsuch termination of Service. 

(e) Other Termination of Service. If the Participant’s Service isterminated for any reason, other than as described in Section 3(b),Section 3(c)or Section 3(d) above, the Restricted Shares, to the extent then unvested, shall be forfeited by the Participant without anyconsideration. 

4. Continuation of Agreement. Except as specifically stated herein, this Amendmentdoes not change the terms and conditions of the Agreement which remains in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theCompany has executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date first written above. 

 
**SemGroup Corporation**
By:
 
 

Name:
 
Title:
 
 
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,470
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,560
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,140,119
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,111,675
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,230,234)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,560
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    30
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,903)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (50,903)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,903)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS • 1500 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. • WASHINGTON, D.C. • 20220 • 

FOR RELEASE AT 3 p. m. October 30, 1995 Contact: Jon Murchinson (202) 622-2960

TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET BORROWING ESTIMATES

The Treasury Department announced today that its net market borrowing for 

the October - December 1995 quarter is estimated to be $61.5 billion, with a cash 

balance of $20 billion on December 31. The Treasury also announced that its net 

market borrowing for the January

- March 1996 quarter is estimated to be in the range of $70 billion to $75 billion, with 

a cash balance of $20 billion on March 31. These estimates do not include new cash 

to be raised in the March 2-year and 5-year notes, which will settle on April l, 1996.

In the quarterly announcement of its borrowing needs on July 31, 1995, the 

Treasury estimated net market borrowing for the October - December quarter to 

be $60 billion to $65 billion, assuming a $20 billion cash balance on December 31. 

The current estimates incorporate a higher end-of-September cash balance, offset 

by heavier outlays.

Actual net market borrowing in the July - September quarter was $25.7 billion, 

while the end-of-quarter cash balance was $37.9 billion. On July 31, the Treasury 

estimated net market borrowing for the July - September quarter to be $26.0 billion, 

with a $30.0 billion cash balance on September 30. Lower outlays, offset by slightly 

lower receipts, accounted for the higher end-of-September cash balance.

The regular quarterly press conference will be held at 1 p. m. on Wednesday, 

November 1, 1995.

RR-676
#### Georgia Mae PEYTON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50649.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 23, 1978.

James B. Everett, Decatur, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Calvin Coolidge Williams, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

Appeal from- Circuit Court, Newton County; Thomas L. Goldman, Special Judge.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and WALKER, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
#### In re ESTATE of James Clarence JUMPER, Deceased. OUTLET STORE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Reverend Harry FULLILOVE, Administrator, C. T. A., of the Estate of James Clarence Jumper, Deceased, and Maude Prescott, Appellees.

No. 73-944.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 26, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.
Template for certification to accompany notice 

Pursuant to subsection (n) of Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, I hereby

certify that I am [“the Chief Executive Officer” or “a duly authorized designee, as 

defined at 31 C.F.R. § 800.204 (2020),”] of [the submitting entity], which is submitting 

the foregoing Notice, and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief subject to the 

penalties provided in section 1001 of Title 18, United States Code:

1. The foregoing Notice fully complies with the requirements of Section 721 of the

Defense Production Act of 1950, 31 C.F.R. Part 800 (2020), and any agreement or

condition entered into with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United

States or any member of the Committee; and

2. The foregoing Notice, as it relates to the transaction, [the submitting entity], and

[the submitting entity’s] parents, subsidiaries, and any other related entities

described in the Notice, is accurate and complete in all material respects. [Note: a

submitting entity that doesn’t have parents, affiliates, and/or subsidiaries

may omit the inapplicable term(s)]

Signature: __________________________

[include printed name of signer] 

Title: __________________________

Submitter: __________________________ 

[identify the party to the transaction on whose behalf the individual above 

has signed the certification] 

Date: __________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,512
<PP&E>                                           3,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,533
<BONDS>                                          1,963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        155
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                         683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,522
<SALES>                                          2,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,187
<CGS>                                            1,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    239
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       144
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
# Instructions

# Tool

# Aggregate Method Ex with NICRA

# Aggregate Method Ex with MTDC

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png
#### Robert Lee VALENTINE, Appellant, v. David C. BROWN, Prosecutor Attorney; Robert Bozovsky, Chief Detective Brooklyn Park; Nathaniel J. Pearlson, Forensic Scientist; Jack Denzel Davis, ASC-Supervisor; John Doe, Unknown Agents, Appellees.

No. 02-2556.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 20, 2002.

Filed Aug. 27, 2002.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota inmate Robert Lee Valentine appeals the district court’s preservice dis*56missal of Valentine’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons relied on by the district court, but we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. We thus affirm the judgment as modified. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.
EXHIBIT 10.10

2010 Discretionary Cash Compensation Plan

The Nevada Property 1 LLC 2010 Discretionary
Cash Compensation Plan (the 2010 Plan) is designed to reward the executive officers as well as certain other officers and employees (the executives and employees) within the Companys project development and operations
departments for a successful opening of the Property and completion of the Project within budget. The 2010 Plan covers the performance period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010 and applies to executives and employees hired
prior to October 1, 2010. The executives and employees will be eligible to receive performance-based compensation upon the attainment of certain target performance metrics. The performance metrics comprise of the following goals:



| |  |  | completion of the project on time and within budget (50% weighting); and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a successful launch of the project measured in the period from opening on December 15, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (50% weighting).
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Various performance levels will be approved by the Board with a payout level (as a percentage of a target award pool)
associated with each level of performance as follows: (i) does not meet, 0%, (ii) partially meets, 50% (iii) meets, 100%; and (iv) exceeds, 125%. Management will submit an evaluation of performance to the Board for its review and
approval. The Board may, in its sole discretion, increase the target award pool amount.
#### Rose SANTO and Carmine Santo, her husband, Petitioners, v. Jack NEWLANDS et al., Respondents.

No. 73-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 5, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.
#### Richard A. PAUL, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-652.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 13, 1972.

Habeas Corpus denied.
#### Terry Alan ELY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-658.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 3, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Document

Exhibit 10.3

OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE ANNUAL BONUS PLAN


AMENDMENT NO. 1


The Otis Worldwide Corporation Executive Annual Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective April 27, 2021 as follows:


1.The Plan is renamed as the “Otis Worldwide Corporation Short-Term Incentive Plan.”


2.The reference to “annual bonus” in the first sentence of Section 6 is replaced with “short-term incentive” and the last sentence of Section 6 is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


The short-term incentive target shall be expressed as a percentage of the Eligible Employee’s annual salary in effect at the end of the Performance Period (or, for purposes of Section 9, the first day of the month immediately preceding the month in which a Change in Control occurs), unless otherwise specified in the Award.


3.The second and third sentences of Section 7 are revised to read as follows:




Cash payments made in respect of Awards will be paid as soon as administratively practicable following the end of the applicable Performance Period and the Committee’s determination of the achievement of the underlying performance goals, and, for Eligible Employees on a United States-based payroll, no later than the 15th day of the third month following the end of the Performance Period (or such later date that would not cause such Awards to fail to qualify as short-term deferrals under Section 409A). In order to be eligible to receive an Award, an Eligible Employee must be employed on the date the Award is paid, subject to Section 9 hereof and any rules established under the Plan from time to time.


4.The reference to “target bonus” in Section 9 is replaced with “short-term incentive target.”








June 16, 2021                   /s/ Nora E. LaFreniere                                    
                                                Nora E. LaFreniere
                                                General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alejandro Quiñones MEDINA AKA Alejandro Quiñonez AKA Andres Reyes Quiñonez, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 99-10332.

D.C. No. CR-99-00033-VRW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 9, 2002.

Decided Aug. 6, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Alejandro Quiñones Medina appeals from the mandatory minimum sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute heroin, one count of distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and two counts of distribution and possession with intent to distribute heroin. 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1).

The district court correctly rejected Medina’s claim of sentencing entrapment, a defense intended to ensure that defendants are not prosecuted for a drug offense of greater magnitude than the defendant was predisposed to commit. *See United States v. Staufer,*38 F.3d 1103, 1107 (9th Cir.1994). The defendant bears the burden of showing sentencing entrapment by a preponderance of the evidence. *United States v. Naranjo,*52 F.3d 245, 250 *&*n. 13 (9th Cir.1995). Here there was no evidence of entrapment beyond the defendant’s conclusory declaration. The specific transcripts produced involving two of the three drug deals indicate defendant’s predisposition to commit the crimes and fail to reflect any unwillingness whatsoever. *Cf. id.*at 251 (noting agents had to persuade defendant to go through with drug transaction).

The defendant also claims that the district court’s imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence of imprisonment and supervised release based on the quantity of the drugs involved in the offense violated the principles of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We have recently held that the mandatory minimum provision under which he was sentenced does not implicate *Apprendi. See United States v. Hitchcock,*286 F.3d 1064, 1073 (9th Cir.2002). *See also Harris v. United*States,-U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 2420, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002). Defendant’s supervised release claim is foreclosed by *United States v. Barragan,*263 F.3d 919, 925-26 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

*

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### R. D. JEFFRIES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Willie JACKSON et al., Respondents.

No. 40586.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.