alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,000
<PP&E>                                           5,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          284,447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       687,386
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,096,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,267
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               150,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (150,850)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (153,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (153,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 110,348
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,944)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Reubin R. ALFORD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44242.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 479.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cox Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, James O. Robbins,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jimmy W. Hayes, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ James O. Robbins
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name: James O. Robbins
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                Date: May 5, 2004

                                                /s/ Jimmy W. Hayes
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name: Jimmy W. Hayes
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                                Date: May 5, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other documentation authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to Cox and will be retained
by Cox and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification "accompanies" the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cox under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-30561

Summary Calendar

Kevin Kaigler, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

James M. LeBlanc; Darryl Vannoy; Shirley Coody; 

Joseph Lamartimiere; Butch H. Browning; Jimmy Guidry, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:18-CV-350

Before Jones, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Kevin Kaigler, Louisiana prisoner # 5566932 , seeks leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against various prison and state 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 2, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-30561 Document: 00516078223 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/02/2021
No. 20-30561

2

officials alleging he is being subjected to unsafe and unsanitary conditions of 

confinement, for failure to state a claim. By moving to proceed IFP, Kaigler 

is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal was not taken 

in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our 

inquiry into Kaigler’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves 

legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard 

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and 

citations omitted).

Kaigler challenges only the district court’s conclusion that he failed to 

state that any of the defendants knew of the complained of conditions. He 

failsto address any of the other conclusions reached by the district court and, 

otherwise, makes only conclusional statements in support of his argument 

that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. Thus, the appeal 

lacks arguable merit. See Howard, 707 F.2d at 220. 

Accordingly, Kaigler’s IFP motion is DENIED, and the appeal is 

DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2; Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 

n.24. The district court’s dismissal of Kaigler’s complaint and our dismissal 

of this appeal count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Coleman v. 

Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 537 (2015). Kaigler is CAUTIONED that if he 

accumulates three strikes, he will not be allowed to proceed IFP in any civil 

action or appeal filed while he is detained or incarcerated in any facility unless 

he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

Case: 20-30561 Document: 00516078223 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/02/2021
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 256 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 

of 2002. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2021 

Ms. LEE of California (for herself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. MASSIE, Ms. 

TLAIB, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. TRONE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. 

PRESSLEY, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. BEYER, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. RUSH, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. POCAN, Mr. PANETTA, 

Mr. SARBANES, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. 

TONKO, Mr. JONES, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. 

RASKIN, Mr. RYAN, Mr. WELCH, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. MOULTON, and Ms. 

SPANBERGER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 256 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI2 TARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 

3 2002. 

4 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

5 Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243; 50 U.S.C. 

6 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§ 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CONVERGENCE ETHANOL, INC. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James
      A. Latty and Richard W. York, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      their
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 16 ,
      2007





/s/
      James A. Latty


James
      A.
      Latty,


Chief
      Executive Officer








Date:
      February 16 ,
      2007





/s/
      Richard W. York


Richard
      W. York,


Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Ang, Kahn Han, President of Sooner Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Omitted;





4.           The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and





b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;





5.           The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.






Dated:  June 13, 2011
/s/ Ang Kahn HanAng, Kahn Han,

President


6
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29,2008 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| *   May 8,  2008* |                    | By: | *  /s/James F. Conway III* |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----|--------------------------------------|
| Date                                  | James F. Conway III     |
|                                  | Chairman, President and |
|                                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

**This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for anypurpose, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling, under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934.**

 

----
#### Shelly McCRANEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50643.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 6, 1978.

Louis Fondren, Pascagoula, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen Gil-foy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Merle F. Palmer, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and WALKER, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concurring.
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

Hugoton
Royalty Trust
Dallas, Texas

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-81849 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc. of our report dated March 5,
2004, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hugoton Royalty Trust for the year ended December 31, 2003. The 2001 financial statements were audited by other auditors
who have ceased operations. Those auditors' report, dated March 19, 2002, on those financial statements was unqualified and included an explanatory paragraph that described the trust's method
of accounting as explained in Note 2 to the financial statements.

KPMG
LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 11, 2004

QuickLinks
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1313 Prepped byLaTeiaShed



### Document

Number: 

# 82 ) ll-B-5 6 Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 6/12/20089:03:31 AM

Sheet 82 of 99P. 2 

## A-88-0 2

Informatio n o n healt ho r ris k assessmen t wa s remove d fromth e docket . Thi s informatio nwa s compile d befor e th e Clea nAi r Ac t Amendment s (1990 ) bu t wa s no t use d i nth e developmen t o f th e chromiu

mNESHAP .



### 1661 8 \ ^ r 

### \V--\ . Y5 „ ~..:^\ 

# Vv.1 ..i . ; ' 8
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation
(the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L.M. (Theo) de Kool, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and
Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 9, 2006                                                
|                                                                       
|/s/ L.M. (Theo) de Kool,                                               
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
U.S. Position on the Additional Financing Investment in the 

Kenya Electricity Expansion Project (KEEP)

June 15, 2016

The United States recognizes the critical importance of the Kenya Electricity Expansion Project 

(KEEP) for developing low-carbon and low-cost energy and expanding electricity service in 

Kenya, particularly to low-income households. The United States is committed, both through the 

World Bank, and bilaterally through the U.S. Power Africa initiative, to work with Kenyan 

authorities, other development partners, and the private sector to develop additional generation 

capacity at the Olkaria geothermal fields and other fields, and to improve operational efficiency 

at existing power plants. The United States welcomes that the Additional Financing for KEEP 

will help finance a feasibility study for an additional 140 MW of geothermal power from a new 

proposed project site – Olkaria VII.

That said, the World Bank should have triggered the Indigenous Peoples Policy (OP4.10) for the 

Olkaria VII feasibility study. A recent Inspection Panel investigation of KEEP found that the 

Maasai have collective attachment to the entire Olkaria geothermal concession, including the 

potential Olkaria VII site. Given the Panel’s finding, and given five years of KEEP supervision, 

the United States has difficulty understanding the World Bank’s argument that it chose not to 

trigger OP4.10 now because it has no knowledge of whether or not Maasai are present on, or 

have collective attachment to, the Olkaria VII site. Electing not to trigger OP4.10 now risks 

foreclosing important upstream consultations to an indigenous group that the Board’s own factfinding body has determined has collective attachment to the site. That is a social risk – and a 

reputational risk – that the United States does not think the Bank should take.

For these reasons, the United States wishes to be recorded as abstaining on this Additional 

Financing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         3314000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10795000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    121000
<INVENTORY>                                    3891000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              26009000
<PP&E>                                        27739000
<DEPRECIATION>                                18461000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                38595000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         23188000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        341000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     7615000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  38595000
<SALES>                                       44157000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              44157000
<CGS>                                         37373000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 43180000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              704000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 599000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     80000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             519000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    519000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 18, 2020

No. 04-20-00206-CR

Jacob Charles Smith,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6597

The Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted court reporter Connie S. Calvert’s first motion for an extension of time 

to file the reporter’s records, we set the records due on August 14, 2020. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 35.3(c). Ten days after the due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an extension 

of time to file the reporter’s records until September 14, 2020. In her request, she explained that 

she has been tending to her elderly mother’s life-threatening health issues that have been 

exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. 

On September 14, 2020, Connie S. Calvert filed a status report but did not state when the 

records would be ready. She noted her nonagenarian mother suffered another debilitating 

setback, and she (Connie S. Calvert) would need additional time to complete the records.

We construe the August 24, 2020 motion and the September 14, 2020 report as requests 

for an extension of time to file the reporter’s records. We GRANT the requests for a period of 

THIRTY DAYS.

We ORDER court reporter Connie S. Calvert to file the reporter’s records in these cases 

by October 14, 2020. See id.

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed records by October 14, 2020, any 

further request for additional time to file the records must be accompanied by a signed, written 

status report that provides the information specified below and states why she was unable to 

complete the record either personally or by acquiring outside assistance. 
The status report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page 

counts, and remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the 

number of pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form. 

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any 

problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond 

the requested date. 

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court