alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Lawrence Weisdorn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MEMS USA, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual  report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


February 21, 2005


/s/ Lawrence Weisdorn
-----------------------------------
Lawrence Weisdorn,
Chief Executive Officer


                                       18
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           2000            1999            1998            1997            1996
                                       -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                    <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income .........................   $    21,073     $    13,535     $     8,654     $     5,275     $     3,573
                                       -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
Weighted average shares outstanding:

   Basic ...........................    16,734,204      16,087,237      15,067,664      11,048,685       8,798,997
                                       -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
   Diluted .........................    16,968,871      16,269,312      15,197,264      11,133,239       8,880,150
                                       -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
Earnings per common share - Basic ..          1.26            0.84            0.57            0.48            0.41
Effect of stock options ............         (0.02)          (0.01)             --           (0.01)          (0.01)
                                       -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
Earnings per common share - Diluted    $      1.24     $      0.83     $      0.57     $      0.47     $      0.40
                                       ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
{00034558.DOC}

SF1 1652475v.2

**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 

2.

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5.

All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following 

unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. 

Date:  March 26, 2013 

  /s/ Brian T. Stevens

Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee (TTAC) Public 

Meeting

March 31, 2020

9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.

via teleconference

1 630 395-0498 or 1 888 942-9688

Participant Code 5550316

Agenda

Designated Federal Officer Krishna Vallabhaneni

Chairperson Lacey Horn

Call to Order

Roll Call by Chairperson Horn

Tribal Opening

Approval of Minutes from December 3, 2019 Meeting

TTAC Committee Updates and Action

Subcommittee Updates

 General Welfare Exclusion Act 

 Dual Taxation

 Tribal Pensions 

 Submission of Record(s) from Meetings

 Discussion of Recent Applicant(s) and Action

Priority Issues Matrix Updates and Discussion - tabled

Public Comments

Other Items 

 COVID-19 Response

Next Meeting Procedural Items

Closing Business

Adjourn
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2324 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2800 South Adams Street in Tallahassee, 

Florida, as the ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2324 EH

1 SECTION 1. D. EDWINA STEPHENS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2800 South Adams Street in Tal4 lahassee, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 8, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2324 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postphens Post Office’’. in Tallahassee, Florida, as the ‘‘D. Edwina Ste- al Service located at 2800 South Adams Street
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF BAERAIR, INC. Respondent FAA CASE NO. 2011 S0150234 (Civil Penalty Proceeding) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE NOT YET ASSIGNED Hearing Date: NOT YET ASSIGNED Hearing Location: NOT YET ASSIGNED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PLEASE TAKENOTICE 

### that, Gregory S. Winton, Esq., along with Jared M. Allen, Esq. ofThe Aviation Law Firm, One Research Court, Suite 450, Rockville, Maryland, 20850, hereby appear as co-counsel ofrecord on behalfofRespondent, Baer Air, Inc. inthe abovecaptioned matter. Dated: April15, 2014 Respectfully Submitted, The Aviation Law Firm 

# /:4(67)

# ;Yl

# ~~~i~**/J~d** 

### M. Allen, Esq. j/theAviation Law Firm One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 Tel: (301) 294 8550 Fax: (866) 568 9886 Counsel for RespondentCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that I have this date sent via U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid, an original and one copy ofthe foregoing 

### Respondent'sNotice of Appearance addressed to: ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building--Suite 2Wl000 And, further, that I have this date sent by electronic mail and by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, a copy ofthe foregoing addressed to: ONE COPY Vincent Bennett Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ANE-7 12 NewEngland Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 ATTN: Vincent J. Bennett Tel: (781) 238-8044 Fax: (781) 238-7055 Vincent.bennett@faa.gov ONE COPY (VIA U.S. MAIL ONLY) Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E.**Wash.ing~;y** D.C. 20590 

## lbff_ Dated: Apri!)s, 2014

)ar M. Allen, Esq. yThe Aviation Law Firm One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 Tel: (301) 294-8550 Fax: (866) 568-9886
#### CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC., Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS SOUTHEAST, INC., Appellee.

No. 77-55.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1978.

Harold Rosen and Paul S. Berger, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming and William D. Ricker, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant, Consolidated Electric Supply, Inc., plaintiff below, appeals from an order *854denying its motion for rehearing. The motion for rehearing was filed in response to the trial court’s dismissal of appellant’s amended complaint which sought both in-junctive relief and damages for deceptive trade name infringement against appellee, Consolidated Electrical Distributors Southeast, Inc., defendant below.

After carefully reviewing appellant’s amended complaint and attached exhibits, in light of the applicable case law, it is our opinion that no cause of action for deceptive trade name infringement was established. Firstly, the names Consolidated Electric Supply, Inc., and Consolidated Electrical Distributors Southeast, Inc. are not so similar as to establish the prior registrant with common law trade name protection. See *United Life Ins. Co. v. United Ins. Co.,*70 So.2d 310 (Fla.1954); *Richard Store Co. v. Richard’s Warehouse Sales & Auction Gallery, Inc.,*63 So.2d 502 (Fla.1953). Secondly, in apparent realization of the aforementioned dissimilarity, appellant alleged that both corporations had acquired a secondary trade name, “Consolidated,” which caused confusion among the parties’ suppliers and customers. Assuming such allegation as true, the word “consolidated,” being generic in nature, could not be appropriated for trade name purposes. *Miller Brewing Company v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc.,*561 F.2d 75 (C.A. 7th 1977).

Accordingly, appellant having failed, as a matter of law, in establishing a cause of action for deceptive trade name infringement, the order appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
Treasury approves Puerto Rico’s plan to invest $64.7 million of CPF funding 

in multi-purpose community facilities to improve resources for 

communities that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Puerto Rico

 

▪ Program Summary: $64.7 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (41% of 

CPF allocation)

▪ Program Description: The Multi-Purpose Community

Technology Centers program will provide funding to build

or renovate facilities—Centros Tecnólogicos—to provide

the public with access to high-speed internet and on-site

devices. Centros Tecnólogicos will have long-term backup

power generation and the capacity to support a substantive

influx of patrons when a natural disaster or other event occurs. 

▪ Key State Contact: Puerto Rico’s Office of Management and Budget (PROMB)

Puerto Rico Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Puerto Rico 

estimates this 

program will fund 

8-10 Centros

Tecnólogicos.
----

**Exhibit        32.2**

| (1)    | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |

|   |   /s/  Robert                  Scott Lorimer |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert                  Scott Lorimer,                           |   |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer                         |   |
|   | August                  14, 2007                                 |   |
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr., as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

​

| /s/ Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr. | ​                                                  |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                      | **Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr.**                               | ​ |
| Title:                     | **Chief Executive Officer and****Chairman of the Board** | ​ |

​

Date: March 1, 2022

----
Proposed European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) 

Investment in Crucea North Wind Farm (Romania)

November 26, 2013

United States Position

While the EBRD’s involvement in this project has led to a stronger biodiversity 

monitoring program, the United States must abstain because the EIA was not released 

120 days prior to board approval as required by the Pelosi Amendment. 

In addition, the United States is concerned with the potential reputational risk posed to 

the Bank by a shareholder’s trading relationship with Iran. The United States appreciates 

the team’s transparency in highlighting the issue in the document and in subsequent 

conversations.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08731

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 08731\08731_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08731\08731_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08731\08731_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08731\08731_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08731\08731_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08731\08731_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

08731\Certification Statement_08731.pdf Plant certification statement

08731\Supporting Documentation\08731_A5-2 MAP-1.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08731\Supporting Documentation\08731_A5-2 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>
CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED
(in thousands of dollars or shares except per share amounts)
Twelve Weeks Ended July 22, 2000 and July 24, 1999
<CAPTION>
                                           Twelve Weeks Ended
                                         ----------------------
                                          July 22,     July 24,
                                            2000         1999
                                         ---------    ---------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>
Diluted:
  Net earnings (loss) applicable to
    common shares:
      From continuing operations         $  2,011     $   (321)
      From discontinued operations           (583)        (639)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net earnings (loss)              $  1,428     $   (960)
                                         =========    =========
Shares:
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding              17,824       17,781
  Shares issuable under employee
    stock plans - weighted average             34           --*
  Dilutive effect of exercise of
    certain stock options                     181           --*
  Less: Treasury stock-weighted average    (9,863)      (7,864)
                                         ---------    ---------
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding    8,176        9,917
                                         =========    =========
Net earnings (loss) per common and
    common equivalent shares:
      From continuing operations         $   0.25     $  (0.03)
      From discontinued operations          (0.07)       (0.07)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net earnings (loss)              $   0.18     $  (0.10)
                                         =========    =========
<FN>
* The dilutive effect of stock options in the amount of 402,946
  shares and 34,159 shares issuable under employee stock plans
  were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               5,400  
<SECURITIES>                                             0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,149,620  
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175,760  
<INVENTORY>                                      5,011,161  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,543,484  
<PP&E>                                           4,117,633  
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,254,974  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,900,430  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,316,134  
<BONDS>                                                  0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0  
<PREFERRED>                                              0  
<COMMON>                                         7,477,006  
<OTHER-SE>                                               0  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,900,430  
<SALES>                                          2,887,025  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,887,025  
<CGS>                                            2,423,254  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      960,064  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21,233  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (517,526) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (121,660) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (395,866) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                      (395,866) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.25) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.25) 
                                                            
                                                            

</TABLE>
#### Herbert SEIDEL and Minna Seidel, his wife and Eugene Howard and Elsie S. Howard, his wife, Appellant, v. Harry BURNS, Trustee, Appellee.

No. 70-721.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.