alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FIRST WISCONSIN NATIONAL BANK OF MILWAUKEE, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK (a/k/a Citibank, N. A.), Palmer First National Bank and Trust Company of Sarasota, and Florasota Development Co., Inc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 77-889, 77-890.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 13, 1978.

Barbara Pankau of Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Schraf & Barkin, Tampa, for appellant.

Jay A. Brett of Sheppard & Woolslair, Fort Myers, for appellee Citibank, N. A.

BOARDMAN, Chief Judge.

Appellate Case No. 77-889 and Case No. 77-890 were consolidated for the purpose of this appeal. Both were mortgage foreclosure actions filed separately by two mortgagees against Seascape Condominium located in Bonita Beach, Florida. Each case was vigorously contested by the parties. Appellant, First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee, was not made a party to either of these proceedings. On June 3, 1975 a receiver was appointed by the trial court to operate and maintain the condominium.

Point Development Corporation of Naples owned a sewage treatment plant located on the premises of Bonita Beach Club which was adjacent to Seascape Condominium. Seascape Condominium was permitted to tap into and use the sewage facilities for a fee which was never paid. On February 24, 1977 Point Development Corporation assigned to appellant its rights and interests in any claim it had against Seascape Condominium for the sewer services.

On March 22 appellant notified the receiver by letter of its interest in Seascape Condominium requesting him to file a claim for $48,750. No response was received by appellant. On April 7 the receiver filed a *961petition for disbursement of funds and discharge. Although not formally notified of the proceedings appellant appeared at the hearing on the petition held April 25. The trial court subsequently entered an order approving the receiver’s final accounting, providing for disbursements of certain funds, discharging the receiver, and refusing to allow appellant to present its claim. It is this order which appellant appeals. We reverse.

Attorneys for the respective parties indicated during oral argument before this court that they were unable to find a case in Florida or other jurisdictions precisely on point. We submit that under these circumstances equitable principles necessitate consideration of appellant’s claim. *See*Am. Jur.2d § 334 (1973). There was no time limit established for filing claims, distribution had not been effected when the claim was filed with the receiver, and appellant timely acted to protect its interest in Seascape Condominium after it arose. Appellant attempted in good faith to file its claim for consideration by the receiver and the court. The door should not have been shut to appellant merely because of impatience or desire to terminate the proceedings. The contention that the period of receivership would be extended by presentation of appellant’s claim is on balance clearly outweighed by principles of fairness and reasonableness.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON and OTT, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                           1,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,047<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,175
<INVENTORY>                                     12,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,084
<PP&E>                                         104,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,750
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,718<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,488
<SALES>                                        120,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,512
<CGS>                                           91,144
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   115
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,645
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCES
<F2>OTHER SE INCLUDES TREASURY STOCK
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
2.3





UNITED
STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT


EASTERN
DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN




In
      re:
              CIB
      MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.
              Reorganized
      Debtor.
            Case
      No. 09-33318
              Chapter
      11





NOTICE
OF OCCURRENCE OF EFFECTIVE DATE


OF
DEBTOR’S PREPACKAGED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION


PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 11 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE





PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on
September 16, 2009, CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. (the “Debtor”) filed the Debtor’s Prepackaged Plan of
Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No.
18] (the “Plan”)1
in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (the
“Bankruptcy Court”).


PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTEthat
on October 28, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law
and Order (i) Approving the Debtor’s (a) Disclosure Statement Pursuant to
Sections 1125 and 1126(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, (b) Solicitation of Votes and
Voting Procedures, and (c) Forms of Ballots and (ii) Confirming Debtor’s
Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code [Docket No. 117] (the “Confirmation Order”).





PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE
that, the Debtor has waived the condition precedent to consummation of the Plan
set forth in Section 10.2(b) relating to the creation of the Creditors’
Trust.





PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE
that, pursuant to Article X of the Plan, all conditions precedent to
consummation of the Plan have been satisfied or waived.





PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE
that the Effective Date of the Plan occurred on December 30, 2009.





Dated:
December 31, 2009


GODFREY
      & KAHN, S.C.By:
              /s/ Carla O. AndresCarla
      O. Andres  (WI Bar No. 1020997)Attorneys
      for the Debtor





GODFREY
& KAHN, S.C.


780 North
Water Street


Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53202


Tel:
(414) 273-3500


Fax:
(414) 273-5198


E-mail:
candres@gklaw.com


1 Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Plan.
U.S. TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3RD QUARTER 2003

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 6/26 6/30 7/3 17.00 17.00 18.00 48.56 3.44

3&6 MONTH BILLS 7/3 7/7 7/10 17.00 17.00 18.00 51.72 0.28

7/10 7/14 7/17 8.00 16.00 18.00 42.72 -0.72

7/17 7/21 7/24 10.00 15.00 17.00 41.13 0.87

7/24 7/28 7/31 20.00 16.00 17.00 47.66 5.34

7/31 8/4 8/7 20.00 16.00 17.00 49.00 4.00

8/7 8/11 8/14 20.00 16.00 17.00 38.00 15.00

8/14 8/18 8/21 25.00 16.00 16.00 42.00 15.00

8/21 8/25 8/28 25.00 16.00 16.00 53.00 4.00

8/28 9/1 9/4 16.00 16.00 16.00 54.00 -6.00

9/4 9/8 9/11 16.00 16.00 15.00 55.00 -8.00

9/11 9/15 9/18 11.00 16.00 15.00 60.00 -18.00

9/18 9/22 9/25 16.00 16.00 15.00 59.00 -12.00

645.00 641.79 3.22

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

12-Day Bill 8/28 9/2 9/3 20.00 20.00 0.00

 Matures 9/15

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-Year TIPS 7/7 7/9 7/15 11.00 +5.00 0.00 11.00

2-Year Note 7/21 7/23 7/31 25.00 11.01 13.99

3-Year Note 7/30 8/5 8/15 25.00 +3.00

5-Year Note 7/30 8/6 8/15 20.00 +2.00

10-Year Note 7/30 8/7 8/15 20.00 +2.00 43.69 21.31

2-Year Note 8/25 8/27 9/2 24.00 -1.00 13.08 10.93

5-Year Note 9/8 9/10 9/15 20.00 

10-Year Note (R) 9/8 9/11 9/15 16.00 -4.00 0.00 36.00

2-Year Note 9/22 9/24 9/30 24.00 16.14 7.86

185.00 83.91 101.09

R = Reopening NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 104.30

A = Announced

A A A

A A

Treasury announced a Q3 

borrowing need of $104 

billion on 7/28/03.

A

A A

A

A

A A A

A

A

A A
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The
undersigned, J. David Pierson, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief
Executive Officer of CPI Corp. (the Company), has executed this certification
in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 8, 2003
(the Report).

The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 18th day of
December, 2003.

|                                                                                                         | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  J. David Pierson                                                                                    | 
|J. David Pierson
       Chairman of the Board of Directors,
       President and Chief Executive Officer | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to CPI Corp. and will be retained by CPI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000024148
[NAME] CONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LTD
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-1998
[CASH]                                         1292723
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                237725
[PP&E]                                        13993648
[DEPRECIATION]                                11703681
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 3820415
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          2355645
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                             0
[OTHER-SE]                                     1464770
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   3820415
[SALES]                                         133948
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                133948
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                186705
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                (52757)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            (52757)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                   (52757)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                   (1.67)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (1.67)
</TABLE>
No. 00-7512.

#### Arnulfo Zuniga *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Thomas N. Chewning, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Natural Gas Company:

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Virginia 

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Virginia over

$67 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Freedom First Federal Credit Union Roanoke CDFI $ 21,000,000 

Peoples Advantage Federal Credit Union Petersburg CDFI $ 10,000,000 

VCC Bank Richmond CDFI $ 36,400,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
#### Robert A. JANSEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-517.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1978.

Shaya Estrumsa, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed based on the following authorities: *Codie*v. *State,*313 So.2d 754 (Fla.1975); Man*ning v. State,*336 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Moore v. State,*299 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); *Askary*v. *State,*294 So.2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

HUBBART, Judge

(concurring).

I concur in the court’s affirmance in this case. As to the appellant’s contention that it was error for the trial court to admit evidence of the defendant’s post-arrest silence, it is my view that (1) this question was not properly preserved for appellate review because the evidence was admitted without objection, and (2) the admission of such evidence was not fundamental error. *Porter v. State,*356 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (Hubbart, J. dissenting); *Gillian v. State*(Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (case no. FF-59, opinion filed August 18, 1977); *Clark v. State,*336 So.2d 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); *Farmer v. State,*326 So.2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

PEARSON, Judge

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. See *Doyle v. Ohio,*426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); *Davis v. State,*342 So.2d 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Smith v. State,*342 So.2d 990 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), and *Thomas v. State,*342 So.2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Document




Summary of Director Compensation Program
(Effective July 1, 2021)


															
	Annual Cash Retainer:		$	60,000 			
	Additional Annual Retainers:				
	Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee Chairperson		$	20,000 			
	Audit Committee Chairperson		$	20,000 			
	Talent, Development, and Compensation Committee Chairperson		$	20,000 			
	Non-Employee Chairman		$	75,000 			
	Initial Equity Grant		$	100,000 			(a)
	Annual Equity Grant		$	175,000 			(b)


(a) Upon election to the Board, each non-employee director receives restricted stock units with a value equal to $100,000, calculated by using the closing price of our common stock on the date of the non-employee director’s election to the Board. The initial restricted stock unit grant vests on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the non-employee director’s continued membership on the Board as of such date.
(b) On the day following the annual meeting of shareholders, each director receives restricted stock units with a value equal to that indicated in the above chart, calculated by using the closing price of our common stock on the day following the annual meeting of shareholders. The annual restricted stock unit grant vests the day prior to the following year’s annual meeting date, subject to a director’s continued membership on the Board as of such date.
#### CARNER BANK OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellant, v. EASTERN HOSIERY MILL, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1179.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 10, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Glenn R. Pittson, Chief Executive Officer of
OFS Capital Corporation certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of OFS Capital Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 26th day of March 2013.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Glenn R. Pittson   
|    |  | Glenn R. Pittson       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer