alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending October 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Gidwitz, the Chairmanof the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph J. Sum,the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and Section 1350, of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that to our knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiods presented in the Report.

 

 

November 11, 2005

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/    James  G. Gidwitz |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | James G. Gidwitz                             |
|   |   | Chairman of the  Board and                   |
|   |   | Chief Executive  Officer                     |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   | By:    | /s/    Joseph  J. Sum    |   |
|   |   | Joseph J. Sum                                |
|   |   | Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer  |
|        |        |                                              |        |  |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Joseph J. Sum,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Continental Materials Corporation;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  July 30, 2003 |   |
|----------------------|--------|
|                 |   |
|                 | By:    | /s/  Joseph J. Sum |   |
|                 |   | Joseph  J. Sum |
|                 |   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65083-65084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Advisory Committee; Science Board to the Food and Drug 
Administration; Formation of a Subcommittee

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
formation of a subcommittee of the Science Board to the Food and Drug 
Administration (Science Board). The subcommittee entitled ``Board of 
Scientific Counselors'' has been established to address scientific 
issues related to the research programs conducted by the Food and Drug 
Administration. The subcommittee's findings will be presented to the 
Science Board for full public discussion at future meetings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan K. Meadows, Office of Science

[[Page 65084]]

(HF-32), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, 
MD, 20857, 301-827-3340.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the formation of a 
subcommittee of the Science Board. The subcommittee has been 
established to address issues related to the scientific quality, 
mission relevance, and scientific management and leadership of research 
programs conducted by FDA. The subcommittee will meet several times 
over the next 2 years to collect and review information on FDA's 
scientific research programs and to discuss a validated process for a 
coordinated, external, scientific peer review of the agency's research 
programs. The subcommittee's findings will be presented to the Science 
Board for full public discussion at future meetings that will be 
announced in the Federal Register prior to the meetings. This notice is 
issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 1972 
(Pub. L. 92-463 (5 U.S.C. app.2)).

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-32276 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
256 La. 773

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Richard CHOAT and Walter A. Pedan v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50744.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 30, 1970.

In re: Richard Choat and Walter A. Pedan applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32306]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,050 and 050H]

Ithaca Industries, Incorporated, Thomasville, Georgia, Ithaca 
Industries, Incorporated, Quitman, Georgia; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 14, 1997, applicable 
to all workers of Ithaca Industries, Inc., Thomasville, Georgia. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on April 29, 1997 (62 
23273).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows 
that worker separations will occur at the subject firms' Quitman, 
Georgia facility when it closes in December, 1997. Workers at the 
Quitman, Georgia facility are engaged in the production of men's and 
boys' undergarments. Based on these new findings, the Department is 
amending the certification to cover workers at the Quitman, Georgia 
facility.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Ithaca Industries, Inc. adversely affected by increased 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,050 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Ithaca Industries, Inc., Thomasville, Georgia 
(TA-W-33,050), and Quitman, Georgia (TA-W-33,050H) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 
4, 1995 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 1st day of December, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-32306 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
#### Ethel KURZWEIL and William Schwartz, Appellants, v. Herbert E. KAUFMAN and Leonard J. Kalish, Appellees.

No. 69-609.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 26, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Harvey DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 26, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Dominick A. BRETTI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40421.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 8, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 527.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

FRANCISCO SOTO VEGA, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0437 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2001-004633

The Honorable Christopher A. Coury, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Francisco Soto Vega, Buckeye

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen, Judge Kent E. Cattani and Judge 

Jennifer M. Perkins delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 2-13-2018
STATE v. SOTO VEGA

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner Francisco Soto Vega seeks review of the superior 

court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's second

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
#### DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Morris FOX and Jean Fox, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-1152.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Persistent Poverty Counties
#### STANDARD SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Leada A. WEGMANN, a widow, Appellee.

No. 69-162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

July 16, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                           7,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  545,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    561,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,135,586
<PP&E>                                         502,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                 252,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,563,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          910,772
<BONDS>                                        311,108
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,034
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,563,642
<SALES>                                      3,452,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,452,496
<CGS>                                        3,246,326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,246,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               154,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,366
<INCOME-TAX>                                       298
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (6,484)
<NET-INCOME>                                     (416)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Richard John FRAKES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43979.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 277 So.2d 552.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Rosenberg Diamond Development Corp. et al., Respondents, v Heather Appel et al., Appellants.

[735 NYS2d 528]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, continued a prior temporary restraining order prohibiting defendants from disseminating any false, slanderous and libelous material in conjunction with previously enjoined acts of vandalism or trespassing at any buildings owned or managed by plaintiffs and at plaintiffs’ main offices, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and that part of the restraining order vacated.

Prior restraints on speech are strongly disfavored *(see, Ramos v Madison Sq. Garden Corp.,*257 AD2d 492). Free speech is protected from censorship “unless shown likely to produce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest” *(Terminiello v City of Chicago,*337 US 1, 4, *reh denied,*337 US 934; *accord, Edwards v South Carolina,*372 US 229, 237). Prior restraints are not permissible, as here, merely to enjoin the publication of libel *(see, Marlin Firearms Co. v Shields,*171 NY 384; *Ramos v Madison Sq. Garden, supra).*

With respect to the aspects of the prohibition at bar which enjoin any type of verbal communication or the dissemination of materials in connection with other prohibited acts of vandalism and trespass, plaintiffs have failed to meet the heavy burden imposed upon the party seeking the infringement *(see, Nebraska Press Assn. v Stuart,*427 US 539, 570). Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, the objectionable speech as set forth in the complaint cannot in any way be considered “part and parcel of a course of conduct deliberately carried on to further a fraudulent or unlawful purpose” *(Trojan Elec. & Mach. Co. v Heusinger,*162 AD2d 859, 860). Thus, *Trojan*is inapplicable to *240the instant facts. Accordingly, the prohibition against defendants disseminating any false, slanderous and libelous material in conjunction with any prohibited acts of vandalism or trespass is vacated. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32495]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AZ070-1990-00-241A; AZA 23217-A]


Arizona: Reconveyed Mineral Estate Opened to Entry (Mohave 
County)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The mineral estate in the following-described land was 
reconveyed to the U.S. in an exchange under the provisions of sec. 206 
of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, on October 10, 
1988. This order will open the lands to entry under the mining laws and 
the mineral leasing laws.

Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona

T. 14 N., R. 19 W.,
    Sec. 7, lots 1 to 4 inclusive, E\1/2\, E\1/2\W\1/2\.

    Containing 636.52 acres.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At 9 a.m. on January 12, 1998 the land will 
be opened to entry under the mining laws and the mineral leasing laws, 
subject to valid existing rights and requirements of applicable laws. 
Opening this land to mineral entry is in conformance with the Yuma 
District Resource Management Plan, as amended and approved February 
1987. Appropriation of the above-described land under the mining laws 
or mineral leasing laws prior to the date and time of restoration is 
unauthorized. Any such attempted appropriation, including attempted 
adverse possession under 30 U.S.C. 38 shall vest no rights against the 
United States. Acts required to establish a location and to initiate a 
right of possession are governed by state law where not in conflict 
with Federal laws. The Bureau of Land Management will not intervene in 
disputes between rival locators over possessory rights since Congress 
has provided for such determinations in local courts. All applications 
and offers received prior to 9 a.m. on January 12, 1998 will be 
considered as simultaneously filed as of that time and date. Those 
applications and offers received thereafter shall be considered in the 
order of filing. A drawing will be held in accordance with 43 CFR 
1821.2-3 if necessary.
    The above-described land will remain closed to all other forms of 
appropriation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Taylor, Lake Havasu Field Office, 
2610 Sweetwater Avenue, Lake Havasu City, Arizona 86406-9071, (520) 
505-1200.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
Mary Jo Yoas,
Supervisor, Lands and Minerals Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-32495 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                            SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004) (the
"Report") by Cash Systems, Inc. ("Registrant"), I, Michael D. Rumbolz, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

               1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

               2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: March 16, 2006                  By:   /s/ Michael D. Rumbolz
                                             -----------------------------------
                                       Michael D. Rumbolz
                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### IN RE WILL and Estate OF Bonnie Bishop ARNOLD, Deceased. MISSISSIPPI STATE HOSPITAL v. Willie Lois Bishop BENTON.

No. 50608.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 6, 1978.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by R. Hugo Newcomb, Sr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellant.

King & Spencer, Robert W. King, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; J. C. Stennett, Chancellor.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the  accompanying  Annual Report of Sooner Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003
(the "Report"),  I, R.C. Cunningham III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  July 25, 2007
                                                      /s/ R.C. Cunningham III
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     R.C. Cunningham III Chief
                                                     Financial Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.

















                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
256 La. 799

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Raymond E. CARBIN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50855.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1970.

In re: Raymond E. Carbin applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The only contention of relator is that Boykin should be applied retroactively. Since Boykin is not retroactive we refuse the writ. See Halliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831, 89 S.Ct. 1498, 23 L.Ed.2d 16; Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274.