alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
USG position on the World Bank Group and AfDB investments in the “Private 

Power Generation (Bujagali) project in Uganda: April 26, 2007 

The United States supported the Uganda - Private Power Generation (Bujagali) project at 

the IDA, IFC, and MIGA and at the AfDB (named the “Bujagali Hydroelectric Power 

Project”), because the project is expected to confer significant development benefits for 

the people of Uganda. This expansion of power generation is crucial to help Uganda 

emerge from its current power crisis and create the growth needed to meet Uganda's 

development objectives. In addition, the United States supported the project because of 

the steps being taken by the project sponsor, the World Bank Group, and the Government 

of Uganda to mitigate adverse social and environmental impacts. For example, the 

Government of Uganda designated Kalagala Falls as a biodiversity offset, including the 

preservation of the Mbira forest reserve. In addition, we note the Ugandan authorities' 

intentions to adhere to the Agreed Curve in the management of the levels of Lake 

Victoria in the future, and their assurances that any deviation from the agreed release will 

be done in consultation and agreement with affected countries.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

p0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140589 & (90)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140589 COA: 284245 Wayne CC: 06-014443-FC CAROL ANN POOLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be review ed by this Court.
#### Kenneth GROSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1023.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

As independent registered publicaccountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-157174, 333-44513 and 333-114332) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-54994, 33-80162, 333-31138, 333-54980, and 333-83392) of our report datedSeptember 28, 2011, related to the consolidated financial statements of Escalon Medical Corp. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the years then ended included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedJune 30, 2011. It should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to June 30, 2011, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report. 

/s/ MAYER HOFFMAN McCANN, P.C. 

PlymouthMeeting, Pennsylvania 

September 28, 2011
# Certi

**~** 

# vf Participation certificate is awarded to This 27TH 

# D S:LR p;,; **p~** 

# . aru w u "'-'-''

1 

### ~;&7ke•f/ )'
EXHIBIT
23.2
 
 
 [LETTERHEAD
OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]
 
 February
22, 2010
 
 Hugoton
Royalty Trust
 P.O. Box
830650
 Dallas,
TX 75283-0650
 
 
 Re:
              Hugoton
      Royalty Trust
                2009 Annual Report on Form
      10-K
  
 Gentlemen:
 
 The firm
of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the references to our firm in the form
and context in which they appear and to the use of our report dated February
17, 2010, regarding the Hugoton Royalty Trust Proved Reserves and Future
Net Revenue as of December 31, 2009, in the 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K.  We further consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement No. 333-81849 on Form S-8 of XTO Energy Inc.
 
 The subject
      report was prepared by Miller and Lents, Ltd. for the use of XTO Energy Inc. The
      analysis, conclusions, and methods contained in the report are based upon information that was in
      existence at the time the reports were rendered. While the subject report may be used as a descriptive
      resource, investors are advised that Miller and Lents, Ltd. has not verified information provided by
      others except as specifically noted in the reports, and Miller and Lents, Ltd. makes no representation or
      warranty as to the accuracy of information provided by others. Moreover, the conclusions contained in
      the report are based on assumptions that Miller and Lents, Ltd. believed were reasonable at the time of
their preparation and that are described in the report in reasonable detail. However, there are a wide
range of uncertainties and risks that are outside of the control of Miller and Lents, Ltd. which may
impact these assumptions, including but not limited to unforeseen market changes, actions of
governments or individuals, natural events, economic changes, and changes of laws and regulations or
interpretation of laws and regulations.
 
 Miller
and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in the Hugoton Royalty Trust or in any
affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as
payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise
connected with Hugoton Royalty Trust.  We are not employed by Hugoton
Royalty Trust on a contingent basis.
 
 Yours
very truly,
 
 MILLER
AND LENTS, LTD.
 
 
 By    /s/James
C.
Pearson
 James C.
Pearson
 Chairman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               5
<CIK>                                          0000861502
<NAME>                         THE COEUR D'ALENES Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                            USD

<S>                             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 SEP-25-1999 SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    SEP-26-1999 SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-25-1999 SEP-26-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1           1
<CASH>                                 32,422      39,486
<SECURITIES>                                0           0
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,086,229   1,474,117
<ALLOWANCES>                           67,166      56,848
<INVENTORY>                         2,464,247   2,553,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    3,602,037   4,066,139
<PP&E>                              5,059,408   4,896,087
<DEPRECIATION>                      1,715,242   1,539,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      7,013,980   7,495,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,497,219   1,963,860
<BONDS>                             2,714,640   2,710,884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0           0
<PREFERRED>                                 0           0
<COMMON>                            1,186,192   1,186,192
<OTHER-SE>                          1,908,170   1,768,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        7,013,980   7,495,192
<SALES>                            12,247,613  14,368,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   12,334,238  14,430,428
<CGS>                               8,957,654  10,721,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      11,944,322  13,877,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      308,226     412,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       12,000      12,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    248,006     301,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       202,130     361,511
<INCOME-TAX>                           60,220     110,485
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   202,130     361,511
<DISCONTINUED>                              0           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0           0
<CHANGES>                                   0           0
<NET-INCOME>                          141,910     251,026
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.03        0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.02        0.04


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2582 

To amend the definition of eligible entity in the second draw loan program 

of the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2021 

Mr. HILL (for himself and Ms. HOULAHAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the definition of eligible entity in the second 

draw loan program of the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PPP Revenue Adjust5 ment Calculation To Increase Capital Accessibility Long6 term Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘PRACTICAL Act of 2021’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR PAYCHECK PROTECTION PRO8 GRAM SECOND DRAW LOANS. 

9 Section 7(a)(37)(A)(iv)(I)(bb) of the Small Business 

10 Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(37)(A)(iv)(I)(bb)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2582 IH

1 (1) in subitem (AA), by striking ‘‘during the 

2 first’’ and all that follows through ‘‘in 2019’’ and in3 serting the following: ‘‘during any contiguous 90-day 

4 period in 2020 that demonstrate not less than a 25- 

5 percent reduction from the gross receipts of the enti6 ty during the same period in 2019’’; and 

7 (2) by striking subitems (BB), (CC), and (DD) 

8 and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(BB) if the entity was 

10 not in business during the 

11 entirety of 2019, but was in 

12 business for not fewer than 

13 90 consecutive days begin14 ning in 2019, had gross re15 ceipts during any contiguous 

16 90-day period beginning in 

17 2020 that demonstrate not 

18 less than a 25-percent re19 duction from the gross re20 ceipts of the entity during 

21 the same 90-day period be22 ginning in 2019; and 

23 ‘‘(CC) if the entity was 

24 not in business during 2019, 

25 but was in operation for not 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2582 IH

1 fewer than 90 consecutive 

2 days during 2020, had gross 

3 receipts during any contig4 uous 90-day period in 2020 

5 that demonstrate not less 

6 than a 25-percent reduction 

7 from the gross receipts of 

8 the entity during an earlier 

9 contiguous 90-day period in 

10 2020;’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Alberto GUERRERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Linda C. Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on July 3, 1973 (281 So.2d 557) affirming the judgments of conviction and sentences of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida (formerly Criminal Court1 of Record # 72-984) in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed January 23, 1974 (289 So.2d 396) and mandate now filed in this court reversed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause with directions;

Now, therefore, It is ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on September 11, 1973 is withdrawn, this court’s opinion and judgment filed in this cause on July 3, 1973 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment of conviction and sentence for breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter a judgment of conviction for breaking and entering with intent to commit petit larceny and to resentence appellant accordingly. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.).
#### Samuel ST. CLAIR, Appellant, v. HARBOR STATE BANK and Jacobsen Mobile Home Mfg., Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 42239.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 28, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 1972.

The motion of appellee, Harbor State Bank, to quash appeal is granted and it is ordered that the appeal he and the same is hereby dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Sylvan Inc., a Nevada corporation, has the domestic and international
subsidiaries listed below. All are wholly owned except as noted. Certain
international subsidiaries are not named because they are not significant in the
aggregate. Sylvan Inc. has no parent.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  State/Country of Incorporation
                                                                  ------------------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>
Quincy Corporation                                                          Florida
Somycel S.A.                                                                France
Sylvan Africa (Pty) Ltd.                                                    South Africa
Sylvan America, Inc.                                                        Nevada
Sylvan America, Inc.                                                        Pennsylvania
Sylvan Bioproducts, Inc.                                                    Pennsylvania
Sylvan Communications, Inc.                                                 California
Sylvan Denmark                                                              Denmark
Sylvan Export Corporation                                                   Barbados
Sylvan Foods, Inc.                                                          Pennsylvania
Sylvan Foods (France) S.A.                                                  France
Sylvan Foods (Netherlands) B.V.                                             Netherlands
Sylvan Holdings Pty Ltd. (a)                                                Australia
Sylvan Horst B.V. (b)                                                       the Netherlands
Sylvan Hungaria Kft.                                                        Hungary
Sylvan Hungary Compost Producing and Trading Ltd.                           Hungary
Sylvan Ireland                                                              Ireland
Sylvan Italia S.r.l.                                                        Italy
Sylvan Nederlands B.V.                                                      the Netherlands
Sylvan Pilz AG                                                              Switzerland
Sylvan Polska Sp. z.o.o.                                                    Poland
Sylvan Spawn Canada, Ltd.                                                   Canada
Sylvan Spawn Laboratory Hungary Ltd.                                        Hungary
Sylvan Spawn Limited                                                        England
Sylvan Tarim Urunleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi (c)                 Turkey
Tartarin S.A.                                                               France
White Queen Ltd.                                                            England

</TABLE>

-----------------------
(a)   49% ownership

(b)   75% ownership

(c)   60% ownership




                                       63
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. APPEARS HERE]

                                March 27, 2002

Hugoton Royalty Trust
P.O. Box 830650
Dallas, TX 75283-0650

    Re:   Hugoton Royalty Trust
          2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Gentlemen:

    The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd., consents to the use of its name and
to the use of its report dated March 22, 2002, regarding the Hugoton Royalty
Trust Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of January 1, 2002, in the
2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

    Miller and Lents, Ltd., has no interests in the Hugoton Royalty Trust or
in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such
interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or
employee otherwise connected with Hugoton Royalty Trust. We are not employed
by Hugoton Royalty Trust on a contingent basis.


                                       Yours very truly,

                                       MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

                                       By /s/ James C. Pearson
                                          -----------------------------
                                          James C. Pearson
                                          Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Prospective Grant of Exclusive Patent Licenses

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is issued in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) 
and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(I). The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is 
contemplating the granting of an exclusive license in the United States 
to practice the invention embodied in U.S. Patent Number 5,089,141, 
titled ``Chemical Process for Removing Selenium From Water''. The 
exclusive license is to be granted to Rust Environmental & 
Infrastructure Inc., having a place of business in Salt Lake City, 
Utah. The patent rights in this invention has been assigned to the 
United States of America.
    The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will 
comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 
While the primary purpose of this notice is to announce Reclamation's 
intent to grant an exclusive license to practice the patent listed 
above, it also serves to publish the availability of this patent for 
licensing in accordance with law. The prospective license may be 
granted unless Reclamation receives written evidence and argument which 
establish that the grant of the license would not be consistent with 
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

DATES: Written evidence and arguments against granting the prospective 
license must be received by March 18, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Inquiries, comments, and other materials relating to the 
contemplated license may be submitted to Donald E. Ralston, Bureau of 
Reclamation, Research and Technology Transfer, MS-7621, 1849 C Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240.
    A copy of the above-identified patent may be purchased from the 
NTIS Sales Desk by telephoning 1-800-553-NTIS or by writing NTIS at 
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald E. Ralston by telephone at 
(202) 208-5671.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention relates to removal techniques 
of selenium from water. The patent addresses a chemical process for 
selectively removing organoselenium compounds and selenate from water 
supplies. The process utilizes a combination of transition metal 
selected from the group consisting of nickel and copper and an 
electropositive metal selected from the group consisting of magnesium 
and aluminum to effectively remove selenium whether present in water as 
organic or inorganic compounds or in ionic or non-ionic form.
    Properly filed competing applications received by Reclamation in 
response to this notice will be considered as objections to the grant 
of the contemplated license.

    Dated: December 1, 1997.
Stanley L. Ponce,
Director, Research and Technology Transfer.
[FR Doc. 97-33070 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-M
p.1 

OAR Box 1313 

Prepped by LaTeia Shed 

Document Number: 

82) ll-B-56 

Docket Number: 

A-88-02 

Printed 6/12/2008 9:03:31 AM Sheet 82 of 99 
P.2 

A-88-02 

Information on health or risk assessment was removed from the 

docket. This information was compiled before the Clean Air 

Act Amendments (1990) but was not used in the development of 

the chromium NESHAP. 

16618 \ ^r \V--\. 

Y5 „ ~..:^\ 

Vv.1 

..i. ;' 8