alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3248]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Public Use Statistics Program Center; Notice of Request for 
Extension of a Currently Approved Information Collection

AGENCY: DOI, National Park Service.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the National Park Service (NPS) intention to request 
an extension for a currently approved information collection in support 
of the Public Use Statistics Program.

DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by April 14, 1997 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Contact Albert A. Galipeau, 
Statistician or Sandra D. Valdez, Program Administrator, U.S. 
Department of Interior, Park Operations and Education, National Park 
Service, Public Use Statistics Program Center, 12795 W. Alameda 
Parkway, Denver, CO, 80225-0287, (303) 987-6950.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: .

    Title: Public Use Reporting.
    OMB Number: 1024-0036.
    Expiration Date of Approval: February 28, 1997.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: The survey is used by NPS for the purpose of collecting 
public interview data which are used to determine conversion factors 
used in converting electro-mechanical visitor counts into recreation 
visits.
    Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
information is estimated to average 3 minutes per response.
    Respondents: Individuals visiting parks.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 18,000.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 7.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 900 hours.
    Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Sandra 
D. Valdez, Program Administer.
    Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate, ways 
to minimize the burden, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, or any 
other aspect of this collection of information to:
    Sandra D. Valdez, Program Administrator, U.S. Department of 
Interior, National Park Service, Park Operations and Education, Public 
Use Statistics Program Center, 12795 W. Alameda Parkway, Denver, CO, 
80225-0287, (303) 987-6950.
    All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the 
request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter of 
public record.

    Dated: February 4, 1997.
Terry N. Tesar,
Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3248 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

December 11, 2017

The Honorable Paul D. Ryan
Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Speaker:

I am writing to notify you, as required under 5 U.S.C. § 8438(1)(2), of my determination that, by
reason of the statutory debt limit, I will be unable to fully invest the portion of the Civil Service
Retirement and Disability Fund (CSRDF) not immediately required to pay beneficiaries and that
a “debt issuance suspension period” will begin on or after Monday, December 11, 2017, and last
until January 31, 2018. With these determinations, the Treasury Department will suspend
additional investments of amounts credited to, and redeem a portion of the investments held by,
the CSRDF, as authorized by law. In addition, because the Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act of 2006 provide that investments in the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits
Fund (PSRHBF) shall be made in the same manner as investments for the CSRDF, the Treasury
Department will suspend additional investments of amounts credited to the PSRHBF.

My predecessors have declared “debt issuance suspension periods” during previous debt limit
impasses. By law, the CSRDF and the PSRHBF will be made whole once the debt limit is
increased. Federal retirees and employees will be unaffected by these actions.

I respectfully urge Congress to protect the full faith and credit of the United States by acting to
increase the statutory debt limit as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

STenen T, Mav cho

Steven T. Mnuchin

Identical letter sent to:
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader
The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader
The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Democratic Leader

cc: The Honorable Kevin Brady, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Richard Neal, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance
The Honorable Ron Wyden, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
All other Members of the 115" Congress
August 1, 2011 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S. Secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of the Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention & Visitors Bureau 

(CVB), please know that our organization is solidly in support of the Small 

Community Air Service Development Program grant request from the City of 

 Naples Airport Authority. This funding request, in the amount of $750,000, will 

be used as part of a multi-million dollar effort to reintroduce commercial airline 

service to Naples Municipal Airport (APF). 

Since 2005, Naples, FL, like many small communities throughout the nation, has 

seen a reduction or elimination of commercial air service. However, Naples is 

unique to many of these communities in possessing the population and 

infrastructure to make commercial air service a success. There is a serious and 

growing air service deficiency throughout the region served by our airport. Your 

support of this application will assist the Naples Airport Authority to meet the 

needs of local businesses, residents and the visitors who enjoy our beautiful 

community each year. 

As the official destination marketing organization for Collier County, we are very 

interested in supporting new air service for the Naples Airport. We are committed 

to assisting the Naples Airport Authority in promoting any new service on our 

website, our annual visitor guide and through our world-wide Public Relations 

efforts. We anticipate that we could commit up to $100,000 through in-kind and 

cash contributions to promote new air service in the coming year. 

We hope you will seriously consider the application from the Naples Airport 

Authority for $750,000 in air service development assistance. 

Sincerely, 

Jack W. Wert, 

Executive Director
Exhibit 13.1

Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Prime Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 28, 2017 |     |                                             
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                     | By: | /s/ William Tsu-Cheng Yu                    
|                     |     | William Tsu-Cheng Yu                        
|                     |     | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                     |     | (Principal Executive Officer)               

|Date: April 28, 2017 |     |                                             
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                     | By: | /s/ Amy Lau                                 
|                     |     | Amy Lau                                     
|                     |     | Interim Chief Financial Officer             
|                     |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 34.1 

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP 

One Towne Sq, Sre 600 

Southfield, MI 48076-3710 

Tel 248 372 7300 

Fax 248 368 8950 

Bakertilly.com 

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors of VW Credit, Inc. and 

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Indenture Trustee: 

We have examined VW Credit, Inc’s (the Company) compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation ABfor the Company’s Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2010-1 asset backed securitization transactions except for the servicing criteria set forth in Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(ii)-(iv), 229.1122(d)(2)(vi), 229.1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii), and229.1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2011 and for the period from January 1, 2011through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”). Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance based on ourexamination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, VW Credit, Inc. complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria for the reporting period ended December 31, 2011. 

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLPs 

/s/ BakerTilly Virchow Krause, LLP 

Southfield, Michigan 

March 27, 2012
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan totaling $2,519,200 to SpinLaunch,

Inc. (the Company), a business critical to maintaining national security with approximately 66

U.S. employees in March 2020.

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(3) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is secured by all the assets of the Company. It has 

an annual interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% and matures on November 13, 2025. The 

Company may draw the loan proceeds in a single draw through November 30, 2020. The loan 

proceeds will be used to provide liquidity to continue the Company’s operations. The transaction 

agreement includes covenants by the Company to comply with certain restrictions on employee 

compensation, stock repurchases, dividends, and reductions in employment levels, as required by 

the CARES Act. The loan constitutes senior indebtedness of the Company, and Treasury will 

receive 3% payment-in-kind annual interest on the loan in accordance with section 4003(d) of the 

CARES Act.
#### UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Jack R. HOOTEN et al., Appellees.

No. 72-519.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 9, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00282-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

233rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 233-655710-19

Before Bassel, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Womack, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE S.Z., Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied for want of a 

reporter’s record and an order. See In re State ex rel. Skurka, 512 S.W.3d 444, 450–51 

(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2016, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s

petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: August 9, 2023
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of OFS Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bilal Rashid, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ Bilal RashidName:Bilal RashidDate:March 13, 2020
### NAVAJO NATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

### SURFACE & 

### GROUND WATER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 339, Window Rock, Arizona 86515

Ben Shelly PRESIDENT

Novem ber 25, 2013 Eugene Bromley (WTR-5) NPDE S Permits Office T el. (928) 871-7701 · Fax (928) 871-7599

U.S. En viron mental Protection Agency

- Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , CA 941 05 

### RE: Clean Water Act Section 

### 401 Certification (Project ID No. 

### 2013-0llSWR) Proposed Mu lti-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Mr. Bromley: Rex Lee Jim VICE-PRESIDENT

Nava jo EPA's Water Quality/NPDES Program has rev i ewed your request for 401 Certification of the proposed modification to the MSGP th at will authorize the disch arge of storm water associated with construction activities. Compliance with the terms and conditions of the MSGP will provide reasonable assurance that the permitted activi ties will be conducted in a manner that will not vio late applicable water quality standards. Navajo EPA hereby issues 401 Certification with the following conditions for the proposed MSGP: 1
. Courtesy copies of N otice of Intents and Stonn Water Pollution Pr eventio n Plans shall be made available to Nava jo EPA for facilities located on Navajo lands. 2. Copies of a ll monitoring report s must be provided to Navajo EPA for facilities located on Navajo lands. 3. Facilities located on Navajo lands and covered under the MSGP will be subject to compliance inspections by Navajo EPA staff with active Federal Insp ector Credent ials under the authority of the Clean Water Act. In order to meet the requirements ofNavajo Nation law, including water quality standards, each of the conditions c ited in the MSGP and this 401 Certification shall not be made less stringent. Please contact Patrick Antonio if you h ave any question s concerning this certification.

onnie Ben , Environmental Dep artment Manager Surface and Groundwater Protection Department Nava jo Nation Environmental Protection Agency
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134443 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. _________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

IN RE ALYSSA ANNE KEAST and 

AMBER MARIE KEAST, 

Minors, 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v 

TIMOTHY ATWOOD and BARBARA ATWOOD, 

Respondents-Appellants, 

v SC: 134443 

 COA: 277354 

and 

Newaygo CC: 05-006388-NA 

NICOLE COPPESS,

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 00-606.

#### Summit Properties, Inc., et al. *v.*Hoechst-Celanese Corp., fka Celanese Corp., et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-41205

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CUAHTEMOC LABASTIDA-SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-96-CR-37-1

- - - - - - - - - -

November 12, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Cuahtemoc Labastida-Salazar appeals from his sentence

following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess

with intent to distribute heroin. He argues that the district

court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3147 and by increasing his offense level by two pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). Because the releasing judge did not comply

with 18 U.S.C. § 3142(h)(2)(A), the sentencing court erred by

enhancing Labastida-Salazar’s sentence pursuant to § 3147. See

United States v. Onick, 889 F.2d 1425, 1433-35 & n.7 (5th Cir.

1989). Accordingly, the thirty-month sentence imposed pursuant to
§ 3147 is VACATED. The remainder of the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000861050
<NAME> UNISTONE, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,001
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,024)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,058)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,088)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
#### Harold CARROLL also known as H. Roy Carroll, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom NEWTON, Warden, Cibola County Correctional Center, Corrections Corporation of America; James Spalding, Director, Idaho Department of Corrections; John Doe I, Chairman, Idaho Board of Corrections; John Doe II through X; Don Russell, Warden, Cibola County Correctional Facility; and Corrections Corporation of America, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-2103.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 29, 2002.

Harold Carroll, ISCI, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Gail Gottlieb, Christopher A. Holland, Sutin, Thayer & Browne, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th *456Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is a pro se state prisoner § 1983 civil rights appeal. Mr. Carroll is an Idaho state prisoner. During the construction of a new prison in Idaho, state prisoners were transferred for one year to a New Mexico county correctional facility. Appellant and two other prisoners sought class certification, injunctive relief, and other claims for alleged unconstitutional prison conditions at the New Mexico prison. Class certification, the claim for in-junctive relief, certain other claims, and two plaintiffs were dismissed by the district court. Subsequently, the magistrate judge recommended that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. After consideration of Appellant’s objections, the district court adopted the recommendation and dismissed the complaint. Mr. Carroll appeals to this court.

We agree with the district court that none of Appellant’s claims have merit. After a thorough review of the briefs and the record and for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s March 25, 2002, Order adopting the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned recommended disposition, we hold that no relief is available to Mr. Carroll pursuant to § 1983.

The decision of the trial court is AFFIRMED. We remind Appellant that because his motion to proceed without prepayment of the appellate filing fee was granted, he must continue making partial payments on court fees and costs previously assessed until such have been paid in fall.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.