alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE]                      5
[MULTIPLIER]                   1
[CURRENCY]                     U.S. DOLLARS
<TABLE>       
<S>                             <C> 
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]               JUN-30-1997
[PERIOD-END]                    JUN-30-1997
[EXCHANGE-RATE]                 1  
[CASH]                          36,656
[SECURITIES]                    0 
[RECEIVABLES]                   98,099
[ALLOWANCES]                    0
[INVENTORY]                     14,039
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                148,794
[PP&E]                          810,163
[DEPRECIATION]                  461,362
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                  558,215
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]           701,623
[BONDS]                         0  
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]           0  
[PREFERRED]                     393,770
[COMMON]                        3,815,080
[OTHER-SE]                      (4,352,258)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]    558,215
[SALES]                         0  
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                2,328,729
[CGS]                           0  
[TOTAL-COSTS]                   3,623,986
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                0  
[LOSS-PROVISION]                0  
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]              62,628
[INCOME-PRETAX]                 (1,349,940)
[INCOME-TAX]                    0  
[INCOME-CONTINUING]             (1,349,940)
[DISCONTINUED]                  0  
[EXTRAORDINARY]                 0  
[CHANGES]                       0  
[NET-INCOME]                    (1,349,940)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                   (.38)
[EPS-DILUTED]                   (.38) 

</TABLE>
#### Janies W. HAMMACK and Dade Typewriter Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. Wilfred Lucian VEILLETTE and Charlotte Veillette, his wife, Respondents.

No. 39738.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 28, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 2, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. 233 So.2d 836.

ROBERTS, C. J., CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., and DREW (Retired), J., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### Namon D. PAIGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 7, 1973.

Namon D. Paige, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Namon D. Paige, was convicted by jury for the crime of rape. The majority of the jury recommended mercy. Following the trial the judge sentenced appellant to life imprisonment. He filed notice of appeal and this court affirmed. Paige v. State, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 727.

Subsequently, appellant filed a RCrP 3.-850, 33 F.S.A., motion in an effort to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence. After review and consideration the motion was denied by the Honorable Gun-ter Stephenson, circuit judge, Tenth Judicial Circuit. The present appeal seeks a reversal of the court’s order entered thereon.

We have re-examined the entire record and files in the case of Paige v. State, *supra,*and have carefully read appellant’s brief filed pro se in support of his contention that he is entitled to an eviden-tiary hearing as provided in Rule 3.850, *supra.-*The grounds alleged therein appear to be matters that were, or could have been, raised in appellant’s direct appeal to *193this court. Yanks v. State, Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 401. They are based solely on his mere conclusions, unsupported by allegations of fact and without more, are not sufficient to justify an evidentiary hearing. In addition, there is no showing that appellant’s trial resulted in a denial or violation of his constitutionally guaranteed rights. Swindle v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 132; cert. den. Fla.1968, 211 So.2d 215; Peterson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 223.

In the light of the record presented here we are in agreement with the conclusion reached by the trial court judge that the contentions thus made as grounds for relief from the conviction were refuted in the record; and, we hold that the said motion to vacate and set aside was properly denied without evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, the order appealed is

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and BOARD-MAN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 10.2**

**AMENDMENTTORESTATED 1989 COURIER CORPORATIONDEFERRED INCOME STOCK OPTION PLANFOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS**

# A.            TheRestated 1989 Courier Corporation Deferred Income Stock Option Plan for Non-employeeDirectors (the “Plan”), as amended on November 4, 1993, is hereby amendedpursuant to the authority reserved in Section 9 thereof:

## 1.             Section 4 is herebyamended by deleting the second paragraph thereof and substituting therefor thefollowing:

“In the event that theoutstanding shares of the Stock of the Company are hereafter increased ordecreased or changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind ofshares, or other securities of the Company or of another corporation, by reasonof reorganization, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification,stock split up, combination of shares, or dividends payable in stock, equitableor proportionate adjustments shall be made in the number and kind of sharesunderlying outstanding Options or Stock Units as well as the number of sharesfor which future grants may be made.  TheBoard of Directors shall also make equitable or proportionate adjustments inthe number of shares underlying outstanding Options to take into account cashdividends declared and paid by the Company other than in the ordinarycourse.  Such adjustments in outstandingOptions shall be made without a change in the aggregate total option price ofOptions then outstanding and unexercised, but with a corresponding adjustmentin the option price per share. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no adjustments shall be required if theBoard of Directors determines that such action could cause an Option to fail tosatisfy the conditions of any applicable exception from the requirements ofSection 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Any such adjustment made by the Board of Directors shall be conclusiveand binding upon all affected persons, including the Company and allParticipants.”

# B.            Exceptas amended herein, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.

# C.            Theeffective date of this Amendment is December 7, 2006.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2501 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2501

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2022

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To require the National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration and the Federal Communications Commission to update the 
         memorandum of understanding on spectrum coordination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Spectrum Coordination Act''.

SEC. 2. UPDATE OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON SPECTRUM COORDINATION 
              BETWEEN NTIA AND FCC.

    Not later than December 31, 2022, the National Telecommunications 
and Information Administration and the Federal Communications 
Commission shall update the Memorandum of Understanding on Spectrum 
Coordination entered into in January 2003, to--
            (1) improve upon the process for resolving frequency 
        allocation disputes in shared or adjacent allocations between 
        the National Telecommunications and Information Administration 
        and the Federal Communications Commission to ensure that such 
        disputes are definitively resolved in an efficient and timely 
        manner;
            (2) ensure that spectrum is used efficiently; and
            (3) establish reasonable timelines for the exchange of 
        information between the National Telecommunications and 
        Information Administration and the Federal Communications 
        Commission in order to maintain effective spectrum coordination 
        and collaboration.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 5, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS

I, Cathy B. Taylor, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Cathy B. TaylorName:

Cathy B. TaylorTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

August 14, 2007


A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and will be
retained by Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.2**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated June 14, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NGL Energy Partners LP and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 and the year ended March 31, 2012 and the six month period ended March 31, 2011.  We have also issued our report dated June 29, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NGL Supply, Inc. for the six month period ended September 30, 2010.  Said reports are included in the Amended Annual Report of SemGroup Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of SemGroup Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-170968, effective December 3, 2010).

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Tulsa, Oklahoma

June 21, 2012

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                                   |  |                    
|------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|              |  |  |  | Southwest Bank,                  
|              |  |  |  | Trustee for Hugoton Royalty Trust
|              |  |  | 
|March 6, 2015 |  |  |  | By:                               |  | /S/ NANCY G. WILLIS
|              |  |  |  |                                   |  | Nancy G. Willis    
|              |  |  |  |                                   |  | Vice President
Exhibit 32.1


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


In reference to this amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Stericycle, Inc. we, Charles A. Alutto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and Daniel V. Ginnetti, an Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify as follows, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002):





|    |                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(a) | the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.




Date: June 11, 2015





/s/ CHARLESA. ALUTTOCharles A. AluttoPresident and ChiefExecutive OfficerStericycle, Inc./s/ DANIELV. GINNETTIDaniel V. GinnettiExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerStericycle, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAIN SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TUDOR FUND
FOR EMPLOYEES L.P. 12/31/96 FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,220,395
<SECURITIES>                                 8,773,008
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,145,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,138,706
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,138,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,612,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,526,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,138,706
<SALES>                                      1,417,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,417,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               596,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                820,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   820,752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   272.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Brenda C. Barnes, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2008                  
|                                    
|/s/ Brenda C. Barnes,               
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### MOUSTAKI v. SEVEN CIRCLES, INC.

No. 38390.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 219 So.2d 768.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2625 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to include Wyoming County in 

the region covered by the Northern Border Regional Commission, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2021 

Mr. JACOBS of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to 

the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to include Wyoming 

County in the region covered by the Northern Border 

Regional Commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NORTHERN BORDER REGIONAL COMMISSION 

4 EXPANSION. 

5 Section 15733(3) of title 40, United States Code, is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘Wyoming,’’ after ‘‘Wayne,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 6, 2016

t0829

Order 

Clerk

September 6, 2016

151934 (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151934

COA: 327141

Muskegon CC: 00-045327-FC

WALTER NEAL, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 2, 2016 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Department of the Treasury 

Hugh Gilmore, Director 

Disclosure Services 

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Washington, D.C. 20220 

R~ ! ~ () I ) - 0 L{ - ) b ~ April11, 2013 

To Whom It May Concern: 

DEPT. OF THE TREASUre; 

DISCLOSURE SERVICE~ 

MAY 1 0 2013 

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act. I hereby request the 

following information: 

All records and communications regarding the people-to-people license to travel 

to Cuba issued by the Treasury Department to Shawn Corey Carter (A.K.A.JayZ, J-Hova, Hov,.lceberg Slim, Jigga, and Jiggaman) and Beyonce Giselle 

Knowles-Carter from January 1, 2012 to April 11, 2013. This includes but is not 

limited to communications from the Office of Public Affairs, Office of Legal Affairs, 

Office of Foreign Assets Control, and Office of the Secretary. 

I also request that, if appropriate, fees be waived as I believe this request is in 

the public interest. The requested documents will be made available to the 

general public free of charge as part of the public information service at 

MuckRock.com, processed by a representative of the news media/press and is 

made in the process of news gathering and not for commercial usage. 

In the event that fees cannot be waived, I would be grateful if you would inform 

me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the 

request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not. 

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look 

forward to receiving your response to this request within 20 business days, as 

the statute requires. 

Sincerelv, ~~·~c;L .._ 

CJ Ciaramella tv r 

Filed via MuckR,ock.com 

E-mail (Preferred): 4916-4t)7580 1 O@reguests.rn_uckrock.com 

For mailed responses, please address (see note):