From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Gabrielle Stevens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/07/2012 12:41 PM

Subject: Emails in relation to EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

John -- second set of emails for the docket

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/26/2012 09:27 AM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Thanks, Jeb. We'll forward to reviewers. 

On the changes since proposal, it would be great to get something like the 

Excel summary table we got at NPRM. You have something similar in the TSD, 

but if EPA could add the CSAPR final rule budgets for the states in both the 

FR and DFR as well as the NPRM amendment budgets as well for the FR so that 

we can see the incremental changes relative to both CSAPR FR and the NPRM, 

that'd be great. 

Have a great day,

Christine 

-----Original Message-----

From: Jeb Stenhouse [mailto:Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:17 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Richard Haeuber

Subject: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Hi Christine,

Per our discussion at today's meeting, I've attached the comment letters 

related to each of the post-proposal changes explained in the preamble to the 

final revisions rule. For each letter, I've identified the relevant pages of 

the preamble that explain the change.

Pages 14-15 of the preamble (See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4822.pdf)

Page 22 of the preamble (See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4803.pdf)
Pages 29-31 of the preamble (See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4792.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4863.pdf)

Sincerely,

Jeb Stenhouse

Chief, Program Development Branch

Clean Air Markets Division

Environmental Protection Agency

202-343-9781

stenhouse.jeb@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 03:13 PM

Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules

Rick and Jeb,

Attached please find interagency comments for the 2 CSAPR rules. 

Speak with you soon,

Christine 

EO1356312866Interagencycomments1_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc 

EO1356312866Interagencycomments2_CSAPR_Revisions_Part_II_2060-AR35.doc 

EO1356312866Interagencycomments3 Final Revisions Rule Significant Contribution Assessment TSD.doc 

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 02:08 PM

Subject: FW: EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules

Second try

From: Kymn, Christine J. 

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:13 PM

To: Richard Haeuber (Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov); Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules 

Rick and Jeb,

Attached please find interagency comments for the 2 CSAPR rules. 
Speak with you soon,

Christine 

EO1356312866Interagencycomments1_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc 

EO1356312866Interagencycomments2_CSAPR_Revisions_Part_II_2060-AR35.doc 

EO1356312866Interagencycomments3 Final Revisions Rule Significant Contribution Assessment TSD.doc 

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 02:58 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Hi Rick,

Yes still on. For tomorrow's call are your folks at all available before 

1pm? 1:30-230 doesn't work.

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----

From: Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov 

[mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:07 AM

To: Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov

Cc: Kymn, Christine J.; Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Christine -- just wanted to double-check and confirm that we are on for

4 PM today.

Thanks

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/31/2012 05:48 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR

 revisions rule
Christine --- talking with here, 4 PM works best for us. So, the call-in 

number and passcode are:

866-299-3188

202-343-9250

Let me know if anything changes.

Look forward to talking with you

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 03:49 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

OK - the ask was for before 1pm actually

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:10 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Christine -- not sure about 1 PM tomorrow for the relevant folks. They will 

be on the call -- can we poll them at that point and adjust the schedule for 

tomorrow accordingly?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 02/01/2012 06:21 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure 

that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is on. Feel 

bad enough about obliging him to today's call!

Thanks,

Christine

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks here, 

though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188

202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/02/2012 02:01 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Hi Rick 

Just left you a vm. Can't do now ...

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:49 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

In case you all can call in, here's a number
Sorry I didn't include call-in info initially -- we'll use 866-299-3188; 

code 202-343-9193 Richard Haeuber Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services

----- Original Message -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: 02/02/2012 02:23 PM GMT

To: Richard Haeuber

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Rick and Jeb,

Looks like we're on for 11am. Do you have a call-in or shall we get one?

Thx!

Christine

----- Original Message -----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 09:08 AM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Good morning --- any word on whether 11 AM will work?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 06:21 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR

 revisions rule

I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure 

that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is

on. Feel bad enough about obliging him to today's call!

Thanks,

Christine

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks here, 

though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188

202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/02/2012 03:34 PM

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Hi Rick,

Am on a call through 430 or 5. do you want to try to touch base around then?

----- Original Message -----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 01:49 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

In case you all can call in, here's a number

Sorry I didn't include call-in info initially -- we'll use 866-299-3188; 

code 202-343-9193

Richard Haeuber

Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services

----- Original Message -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: 02/02/2012 02:23 PM GMT
To: Richard Haeuber

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Rick and Jeb,

Looks like we're on for 11am. Do you have a call-in or shall we get one?

Thx!

Christine

----- Original Message -----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 09:08 AM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Good morning --- any word on whether 11 AM will work?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 06:21 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR

 revisions rule

I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not

sure that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is

on. Feel bad enough about obliging him to today's call!

Thanks,

Christine

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR

revisions rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks
here, though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188

202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 01:02 PM

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Rick,

We have a few follow up interagency comments. Pretty benign. I will forward 

very shortly.

Thanks,

Christine

----- Original Message -----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 11:50 AM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Christine -- as we discussed, this got lost in the shuffle of the other

conversation. Sorry about that. Attached are the comments you requested.

(See attached file: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4784-A1.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4782-A1.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A1.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A4.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A2.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A3.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A3.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A1.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A2.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4800-A1.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4755-A1.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4822-A1.pdf)
Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 01:32 PM

Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Rick and Jeb,

Some additional comments on the rulemaking. These comments and page 

references are based on the original draft. Please let me know if you have 

any questions.

Thanks,

Christine

BB: 202.631.6551

EO1356312866Interagencycomments4_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc.docx 

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 01:35 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Apologies. Disregard this email. These are for a different rule!

-----Original Message-----

From: Kymn, Christine J. 

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:32 PM

To: 'Richard Haeuber'

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Rick and Jeb,

Some additional comments on the rulemaking. These comments and page 

references are based on the original draft. Please let me know if you have 

any questions.

Thanks,

Christine

BB: 202.631.6551
----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 01:44 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Many apologies. They'll notice as soon as they open the file. Lotta balls 

in the air today. 

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:37 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

already sent them....I'll call off the troops

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 02:18 PM

Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

No additional comments thus far. Just what we have on the plate currently. 

Sorry again for any confusion!

----- Original Message -----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 02:02 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

that's what we figured -- and, yes, folks noticed quickly, resulting in

several quizzical emails

so, does this mean there were no additional comments? Or, should I still

anticipate an email from you?
Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 01:44 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment

 Final Rule

Many apologies. They'll notice as soon as they open the file. Lotta

balls in the air today.

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:37 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final

Rule

already sent them....I'll call off the troops

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 02:56 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Thanks, Rick. I will pass EPA's one pager along.

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:44 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Christine --- thanks for the clarification about the comments you sent 

inadvertently. I've attached a one-pager that provides some helpful detail on 

the changes to the budget for one state. I'll send another email in a little 

bit that provides some information on some of the assumptions we discussed 

recently.

Hope this helps

(See attached file: CSAPR Rev Rule TX SO2 Changes.docx)

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 04:01 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Thanks, Rick. I will forward this info as well. 

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:23 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Christine,

As promised, here is some additional information that, I hope, provides 

helpful detail in regard to our recent discussion on technology.

-- We based our scrubber assumptions in the final CSAPR rule on EIA form

860 which provides information on the capability (i.e., "design"

parameters under normal operating conditions) of scrubbers, as opposed to 

actual historical performance data. At that time, we assumed that 100% of 

flue gas was treated at all scrubbers.

-- We responded to comments in the final rule and defended at that time that 

we should, as we did, use capability rather than actual performance data.

-- In the proposed revisions rule, when we tried to address the concern 

raised by facilities in Texas that due to stack configurations 100% of the 

flue gas was not being treated by the scrubber, we deviated from the approach 

taken in the final CSAPR when we based the proposed revisions for flue gas 

bypass on one historical year's performance from the 2008 EIA form 923 for 

the units in Texas.

-- We received comments from EDF, Sierra Club and NRDC pointing out the 

inconsistency with the approach used in the final CSAPR rule and suggesting 
we use scrubber capability information on flue gas bypass that is included on 

EIA form 860, consistent with what we did in the final rule, for the 

adjustment for those units.

-- In this final revisions rule, we acknowledge the mistake in using the 

performance data from from the 2008 EIA form 923 for Texas in the revisions 

proposal, as opposed to scrubber capability from EIA form 860, and the 

correction of that mistake, which we made by taking into account scrubber 

capability data from EIA form 860 in this final notice.

-- Consistent with this final approach for the units in Texas and with the 

final CSAPR rule, we have also applied this approach in the direct final in 

responding to a comment we received in the CSAPR revisions proposal to 

address flue gas bypass for units in Indiana.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/06/2012 02:44 PM

Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

I haven't heard any requests for additional info but will let you know stat if I do.

I'm told Sarah called about these - is it the same question?

Thx!

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 12:01 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J. 

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov> 

Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule 

No, still waiting here as well. Just to securely close this loop - we got you everything you need other than that final 

discussion, right?

Thanks

Richard Haeuber

Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services

 From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]

 Sent: 02/06/2012 02:51 PM GMT

 To: Richard Haeuber
 Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

 Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Hi Rick,

Sorry I haven’t heard anything yet. Anything from your end? Teleworking again today so feel free to 

give me a ring on the BB (202.631.6551).

Thanks,

Christine

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 7:46 AM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Good morning Christine -- just checking in to see if we've made any progress. I'll be in the 

office shortly and look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

-----"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> wrote: -----

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 02/03/2012 04:01PM

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Thanks, Rick. I will forward this info as well. 

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:23 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment 

Final Rule

Christine,

As promised, here is some additional information that, I hope, 

provides helpful detail in regard to our recent discussion on 

technology.
-- We based our scrubber assumptions in the final CSAPR rule on 

EIA form

860 which provides information on the capability (i.e., "design"

parameters under normal operating conditions) of scrubbers, as 

opposed to actual historical performance data. At that time, we 

assumed that 100% of flue gas was treated at all scrubbers.

-- We responded to comments in the final rule and defended at 

that time that we should, as we did, use capability rather than 

actual performance data.

-- In the proposed revisions rule, when we tried to address the 

concern raised by facilities in Texas that due to stack 

configurations 100% of the flue gas was not being treated by the 

scrubber, we deviated from the approach taken in the final CSAPR 

when we based the proposed revisions for flue gas bypass on one 

historical year's performance from the 2008 EIA form 923 for the 

units in Texas.

-- We received comments from EDF, Sierra Club and NRDC pointing 

out the inconsistency with the approach used in the final CSAPR 

rule and suggesting we use scrubber capability information on 

flue gas bypass that is included on EIA form 860, consistent 

with what we did in the final rule, for the adjustment for those 

units.

-- In this final revisions rule, we acknowledge the mistake in 

using the performance data from from the 2008 EIA form 923 for 

Texas in the revisions proposal, as opposed to scrubber 

capability from EIA form 860, and the correction of that 

mistake, which we made by taking into account scrubber 

capability data from EIA form 860 in this final notice.

-- Consistent with this final approach for the units in Texas 

and with the final CSAPR rule, we have also applied this 

approach in the direct final in responding to a comment we 

received in the CSAPR revisions proposal to address flue gas 

bypass for units in Indiana.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/06/2012 06:01 PM

Subject: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR
Rick,

Could you get in touch with OP and have them upload a clean copy of the DFR 

(part II)? ROCIS is open for amendment. 

Thanks,

Christine

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/06/2012 07:22 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR

Thanks, Jeb. Can you ask them to shoot me an email when it's in? 

Have a great evening,

Christine

-----Original Message-----

From: Jeb Stenhouse [mailto:Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 6:54 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.; Richard Haeuber

Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR

Hello Christine,

Just wanted to send a note that we have notified OP and understand they will 

upload the clean direct final rule into ROCIS first thing tomorrow morning. 

Thanks,

Jeb

----- Original Message -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: 02/06/2012 11:01 PM GMT

To: Richard Haeuber

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR

Rick,

Could you get in touch with OP and have them upload a clean copy of the DFR 

(part II)? ROCIS is open for amendment. 

Thanks,

Christine