alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-24-2000
<CASH>                                             334
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,068<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     14,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,305
<PP&E>                                         115,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,207
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,750
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,814<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,907
<SALES>                                        136,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,847
<CGS>                                          102,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,061
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,628
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,806
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,037
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,037
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCES
<F2>OTHER SE INCLUDES TREASURY STOCK
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
     EXHIBIT 21.1 - LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                                                   STATE OF INCORPORATION
----------                                                                   ----------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>
Accelerated Claims Processing, Inc.                                          Delaware
401 Park Avenue South
New York, NY  10016


Quality Medi-Cal Adjudication, Incorporated                                  California
2897 Kilgore Road
Rancho Cordova, CA  95670


Health Care microsystems, Inc.                                               California
3655 Torrance Boulevard
Torrance, CA  90503


CDR Associates, Inc.                                                         Maryland
9642 Deereco Road
Timonium, MD  90503


Quality Standards in Medicine, Inc.                                          Delaware
581 Boylston Street
Boston, MA  02116
</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 25, 2012 

p0118 

Order 

 

January 25, 2012 

143693 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143693 

 COA: 298172 

Oakland CC: 09-227243-FH 

BARRETT RAY SCHWARZLOSE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 11, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
PART I.  ITEM 6(a) EXHIBITS                       EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>

CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                             12 Weeks Ended     
                                          --------------------- 
                                        (in thousands of dollars)
                                          April 26,    April 27,
                                             1997         1996  
                                          ---------    ---------
<S>                                       <C>          <C>      
Primary:

  Net loss applicable to common shares:   $ (2,411)    $ (2,120)
                                          =========    =========
Shares (in thousands of shares): 
  
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding               17,283       17,217 

  Shares issuable under employee
    stock plans - weighted average              31           38 

  Dilutive effect of exercise of
    certain stock options                       78           11 

  Less:  Treasury stock - weighted
    average                                 (5,557)      (3,303)
                                          ---------    ---------

  Weighted average number of common
    and common equivalent shares
    outstanding                             11,835       13,963 
                                          =========    =========

Net loss per common and common 
    equivalent shares                     $  (0.20)    $  (0.15)
                                          =========    =========
</TABLE>








                             20
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Petitioner, v. LIFLANS CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 42335.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 19, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 259 So.2d 515.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Booker T. Washington BARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-67.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, Brad-enton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Kaminski v. State, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 400; Champlin v. State, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 412.

LILES, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
Docke t Managemen t Facilit y! •'I\i'^U-' ^ U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n - ^ LJ . iv > Docl<et No . FAA-2012-008 9

. • 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S E Wes t Buildin g Gran d Floor , Roo m W-12014 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 T o who m i t ma yconcern : I a m writin g i n respons e t o Docke tNo . FAA-2012-0089 , whic h concern s th e petitio n fo r exemptio n fo rSu n Countr yAirlines . Th e servic e o fSu n CountryAirline s fro m Washington , D C t o Lansing , M l i s essentia l t o th e economi cgrowt h o fth e mid-Michiga n region . Currently , Su n Country provide s th e onl ylarg e aircraf t servic e fro m Reaga n Nationa l Airpor tt o Michigan , outsid e o fDetroit . Th e los s o fthi s servic e wil l hav e a n enormous , long-ter m detrimen tt o th e region . Th e Su n Countr yServic e fro m Ronal d Reaga n Airpor tt o Lansing , M l ha s bee n ver ysuccessful . Further , th e servic e ha s save d million s o fdollar s i n airfar e fo rpassengers travellin g betwee n Mid Michiga n an d Washington , DC . Prio rt o Su n Country , th e Lansin g communit yha d trie d unsuccessfull yt o obtai n th e sam e servic e fro m othe rcarriers , withou tsuccess . Shoul d thi s exemptio n no tb e granted , i ti s probabl e tha t th e Lansin g are a wil l no t b e able t o obtai n thi s servic e a tall . Th e grantin g o fthi s exemptio n wil l no tadversel yaffec tsafety . Su n Countryha s bee n operatin g safel you t o fReaga n Nationa l Airport , an d thi s exemptio n wil l merel yallo wthe m t o continu e th e existin g saf e service . Sincerely ,

Eri cSherma n
(4910-13-Pj

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON UMU •• rNC"ES

o;rrM;S'-MOOt

Federal Aviation Administution

14 CFR Part 39

m

,/(¥2-"-

RIN 212Q-AA64

(Docket No. FAA-2009-0659; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-060-AD; Amendmen

lid'll U,C-(=O·Cl

39-*****; AD  -** -**]

'.',n8lo~

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa BrasiJeira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mod "TlNl.$"'."1

~ -:; ,1- 4~t:-

EMB-135BJ, -135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR Airplanes; and EMB-145, -!45E

-145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

Iv

MU, )

ItJ:U. -;9'

S""RQI

/';M - 1--

I'm~L'lSl(o

C. C'-irr<-

,~n

1/0'7/(0

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and con"ect an unsafe

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infomlation (MeAl)

J'!"/\ - J l'-i

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airw-orthiness directive (AD) for the products list

- K..'~"" LPv/'lf'C

Ti~-IO

condition 011an aviation product. The MeAl describes the ul1safe condition as: I~Fn'L.Z

'/-1' j

"M"

It has been found occurrences of main landing gear (MLG) trailing ann

pins broken due to a fatigue mechanism induced by an excessive torque

applied during the assemblage of auxiliary door support attachment and

consequent deformation of the MLG trailing arm axle. A broken pin can

lead 10 loss of the MLG trailing arm axle, disconnecting the trailing aml

from the main strut, which affects the airplane controllability on ground .

• • * • • • •

. {

I -,., ""

~Olrl"l.WSy>,,1ll1.

)"M- l(

MT'A'.~"'.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.   /s/Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   Date:  November 8, 2007   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### John INGRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-539.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to vacate under Rule 3.850 F.R.Cr.P., 33 F.S.A. In his motion appellant alleged that he had not been advised of the maximum sentence which could be imposed upon him and therefore could not have freely, voluntarily and understandingly entered his plea of guilty.

The learned trial judge, who should be commended for the manner in which he *45pursues his duties, held an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s motion to vacate. The transcript of the evidentiary hearing shows that appellant was advised of the possible maximum sentence through his attorney and that his guilty plea had been entered freely, voluntarily and with complete understanding of the consequences. Therefore, the order appealed is

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, David Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hidden Ladder, Inc.;  2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.          The small business issuers sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.          The small business issuers sole officer, I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 12, 2011  /s/ David Johnson David Johnson Chief Executive Officer
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS

0

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND NATURAL RESOURCES

8100 Lindberg Bay, Suite # 61

Cyril E. King Airport, Terminal Bldg., 2nd Floor

St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands 00802

Telephone: (340) 714-9504

Fax: (340) 775-5706

Office of the Commissioner

February 3, 2014

Richard Ruvo, Chief

Air Programs Branch

Region 2

United States Environmental Protection Agency

290 Broadway

New York, NY 10007-1886

Re: Designations under the new PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Dear Mr. Ruvo:

The Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources ("DPNR" or "Department")

hereby acknowledges receipt of your January 30, 2014, email concerning a designation

recommendation from the Virgin Islands for the 2012 Revised Primary Annual Fine Particulate

National Ambient Air Quality Standard.

The Department concurs with your preliminary thought from your email and proposes that the

entire Territory should be designated as an unclassifiable area based on insufficient monitoring

data from the Virgin Islands' PM2.5 monitoring network. The Department looks forward to

working with the Environmental Protection Agency concerning the PM2.5 designation process.

Should you have any questions, concerns, or require additional information, please contact

Magdalene Morancie, Esq., Acting Director of the Division of Environmental Protection at (340)

774-3320 or maqdalene.morancie@dpnr.vi.gov.

cc: Magdalene Morancie, Esq., Acting Director, Division of Environmental Protection
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Ossen Innovation Co. Ltd. (the "Registrant") on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 25, 2013

| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| |
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedMarch 27, 2004 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| *May 7, 2004* |   | By:                     | *  s/James  F. Conway III* |   |
|---------------|--------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Date          |   | James F. Conway III     |
|          |   | Chairman, President and |
|          |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, norshall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000861063
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM IV - SERIES 5, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         23238
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  82108
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107662
<PP&E>                                         2230063
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1965644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          58749
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     313332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   372081
<SALES>                                        390300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               390300
<CGS>                                          257403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   108911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>