alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
11.1 CPI
Corp.
Computation of Per Common Share Earnings (Loss) - Diluted(Unaudited) 12 Weeks
  Ended
  
  24 Weeks
  EndedJuly 24,
  2004
  
  July 19,
  2003
  
  July 24,
  2004
  
  July 19,
  2003Diluted:Net loss
  applicable to common shares:From
  continuing operations
  
  $
  (6,519,237
  )
  $
  (16,843
  )
  $
  (14,168,105
  )
  $
  (2,294,116
  )From
  discontinued operations
  
  
  (2,587,783
  )
  
  (808,683
  )
  
  (3,737,129
  )
  
  (1,261,201
  )Net loss
  
  $
  (9,107,020
  )
  $
  (825,526
  )
  $
  (17,905,234
  )
  $
  (3,555,317
  )Shares:Weighted
  average number of common shares outstanding
  
  
  18,413,448
  
  
  18,339,171
  
  
  18,389,738
  
  
  18,339,127Shares issuable under employee stock plans -weighted
  average
  
  
      
  *
  
      
  **
  
      
  ***
  
      
  ****Diluted effect of exercise of certain stock options
  
  
      
  *
  
      
  **
  
      
  ***
  
      
  ****Less:
  Treasury stock - weighted average
  
  
  (10,425,262
  )
  
  (10,238,303
  )
  
  (10,345,359
  )
  
  (10,238,303
  )Weighted
  average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
  
  
  7,988,186
  
  
  8,100,868
  
  
  8,044,379
  
  
  8,100,824Net loss per common and common equivalent shares:From
  continuing operations
  
  $
  (0.82
  )
  $
  
  
  $
  (1.76
  )
  $
  (0.28
  )From
  discontinued operations
  
  
  (0.32
  )
  
  (0.10
  )
  
  (0.46
  )
  
  (0.16
  )Net loss
  
  $
  (1.14
  )
  $
  (0.10
  )
  $
  (2.22
  )
  $
  (0.44
  )  *
  The effect of stock options in the amount of 12,211
  shares and 17,003 shares issuable under employee stock plans were not
  considered as the effect is antidilutive.**
  The effect of stock options in the amount of 22,370 shares
  and 18,415 shares issuable under employee stock plans were not considered as
  the effect is antidilutive.***
  The effect of stock options in the amount of 36,526
  shares and 17,226 shares issuable under employee stock plans were not
  considered as the effect is antidilutive.****
  The effect of stock options in the amount of 11,303
  shares and 18,415 shares issuable under employee stock plans were not
  considered as the effect is antidilutive.
#### TAYLOR TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. WEST FLORIDA SEAFOOD COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

No. U-283.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 24, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date of Meeting: December 5, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 A.M. to adjournment.
    Place of Meeting: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Sean O'Rourke, 6000 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
409, Rockville, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-2861.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The proposal 
and discussions could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the proposal, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; and 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: November 20, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-31833 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2435 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the label 

of a drug that is intended for human use and contains an ingredient 

that is derived directly or indirectly from a gluten-containing grain to 

identify each such ingredient, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Mr. RYAN (for himself and Mr. STIVERS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

require the label of a drug that is intended for human 

use and contains an ingredient that is derived directly 

or indirectly from a gluten-containing grain to identify 

each such ingredient, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gluten in Medicine 

5 Disclosure Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2435 IH

1 SEC. 2. LABELING OF DRUGS WITH AN INGREDIENT MADE 

2 FROM A GLUTEN-CONTAINING GRAIN. 

3 (a) MISBRANDING.—Section 502 of the Federal 

4 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amend5 ed by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(gg) If it is a drug— 

7 ‘‘(1) that is intended for human use; 

8 ‘‘(2) that contains an ingredient that is derived 

9 directly or indirectly from a gluten-containing grain 

10 (including wheat, barley, rye, and their crossbred hy11 brids); and 

12 ‘‘(3) whose label fails— 

13 ‘‘(A) to state that the drug contains such 

14 an ingredient; and 

15 ‘‘(B) to identify each such ingredient and 

16 the type of gluten-containing grain from which 

17 it is derived.’’. 

18 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Section 502(gg) of the Federal 

19 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by subsection 

20 (a) of this section, shall apply beginning on the sooner 

21 of— 

22 (1) a date to be determined by the Secretary of 

23 Health and Human Services; and 

24 (2) the date that is 2 years after the date of the 

25 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. 00-7499.

#### Mitchell *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

New Jersey

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within New Jersey over

$80 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

1st Bergen Federal Credit Union Hackensack CDFI $ 1,330,000 

NMB Financial Corporation Fort Lee MDI $ 79,062,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
FINRA Foundation

Military Financial Readiness Project
Support for Military Financial 

Educators and Counselors

• Continuing Education Modules for PFMs –

developed and delivered in partnership with AFCPE

• myFICO – 260,000 credit scores delivered

• Digital Resources @

www.SaveAndInvest.org

• Speaker Forums 
Support for Military Families

FINRA Foundation Military Spouse Fellowship Program

• 1,428 Fellowships awarded since 2006 to military spouses 

toward earning the Accredited Financial Counselor®

certification 

• 534 graduates to date; another 

157 in the pipeline

• Over 431,000 hours of service to 

military and civilian communities

• 170,000+ SMs/military families served 

• Many FINRA Foundation Military Spouse Fellows now 

serve as military financial educators / coaches
• Money & Mobility – In Partnership with 

NEFE and NMFA

• How to Save and Invest Your Disability 

Benefits 

• TSP Rollovers

Customized Resources
Collaborators and Partners
What We’ve Learned

• DoD and financial educators do a terrific job, often in some 

challenging circumstances 

• Many service members are doing smart things with their 

money, but...

• Some SMs are still plagued by debt and credit issues

• Service members stationed overseas have more 

disposable income, but some don’t recognize that it will go 

away when returned to CONUS
What We’ve Learned

• Basic Training does a good job in enrolling new recruits in 

the TSP, but...

• Many SMs don’t know why they’re in TSP, or what they 

own; some think of TSP as a (tappable) savings account

• SMs and spouses are anxious about the BRS 

• Many are concerned about future of Social Security
#### Rene MCINTYRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-17325.

D.C. No. CV-01-01244-CRB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 16, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

**The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Rene McIntyre appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging breach of contract and discrimination in connection with a delayed Southwest Airlines flight. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim, *TwoRivers v. Lewis,*174 F.3d 987, 991 (9th Cir.1999), and affirm.

The district court properly concluded that McIntyre failed to state a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim because the facts he alleged do not set forth a constitutional deprivation under any cognizable theory. *See Duffy v. Riveland,*98 F.3d 447, 456-57 (9th Cir.1996).

The district court properly concluded that McIntyre failed to state a claim pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132, or the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, because he failed to allege facts demonstrating that he suffered from a qualifying disability, or that defendants discriminated against him on that basis. *See id.*at 453-55.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing McIntyre’s complaint with prejudice because further amendment would have been futile. *See Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The district court properly dismissed McIntyre’s pendent state claims without prejudice. *See Acri v. Varian Assocs., Inc.,*114 F.3d 999, 1001 (9th Cir.1997).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0711

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KERI LYNN DERBY, 

Defendant and Appellant, 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 20, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 16 2021

04/16/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0711
<PAGE>   1

                HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

                                                         Years Ended October 31,
                                                         -----------------------

                                                           1997    1996    1995
                                                         -------  ------  ------
Primary Earnings per Share:
Earnings data:

     Net income                                          $ 2,081   7,291   8,962
                                                         =======  ======  ======

Weighted average shares outstanding
    Average shares of common stock outstanding            17,613  17,166  16,435
    Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the
      treasury stock method using average market price       305   1,295   1,144
                                                         -------  ------  ------
    Weighted average shares outstanding                   17,918  18,461  17,579
                                                         =======  ======  ======
Earnings per common share:
     Net income                                          $  0.12    0.39    0.51
                                                         =======  ======  ======
#### MIAMI BEACH VACATIONS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU OF SOUTH FLORIDA, a Florida corporation not for profit, Appellee.

No. 69-487.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Clarence WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-434.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 10, 1971.

Clarence Williams, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000072741
<NAME> NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,301,035
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    908,455
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,377,839
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     4,153,679
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,741,008
<COMMON>                                       742,731
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,102,278
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            642,092
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,363,999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          119,789
<PREFERRED>                                    136,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,443,989
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             984,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  299,873
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       46,250
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     53,126
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               115,285
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               4,055,395
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               10,741,008
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,382,321
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            54,589
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,184,487
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,246,912
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        135,409
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,348
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 145,593
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        66,248
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,345
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      4,758
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   74,587
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        14,312
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         114,106
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 6, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127813 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127813 

 COA: 250027 

Wayne CC: 02-015179-01 

MACCEO ROZIER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the Court of 

Appeals for further consideration. 

d0929 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 6, 2005
 

Clerk
#### BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Petitioner, v. Jose R. SOTO, et ux. and Antonio Hidalgo, et ux., et al., Respondents.

No. 42250.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 19, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 259 So.2d 196.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
p. 994.le( . rF 

k7~P 4 -NQ-oPPT-a oas 

Bob Boethling /DC/USEPA/US 

~ 08/20/2007 04:41 PM 

00 3 3 

To Greg Schweer/DC/USEPA/US 

.e, 

cc Cathy Fehrenbacher/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, D 

Lynch/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Diana " 

Subject Re: Fw: TFI Submission for Urea Reaction Products 

RAD/EETD review requested by August 17[] p 

Townsend/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tracy 

Will iamson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

LockelDC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mark 

I reviewed TFI's submission on biuret as you requested . With biuret it is not quite so easy because 

despite some considerable searching on my part, I could not find a close analog with biodegradation data. 

Nevertheless, I'm confident that biuret is readily biodegradable as was the case for isopropyl 

methylenediurea . I would describe low-molecular weight methylenediureas as fairly weak structural 

analogs for biuret, but more on the basis of appearance of the molecular structure than on understanding 

of the mechanism of biodegradation . 

I did find one recent article from Appl. Environ. Microbiol ., attached, that speaks obliquely to the issue . 

This article says that a biuret- hydrolyzing enzyme also is central to degradation of cyanuric acid, because 

biuret is an intermediate in triazine degradation . One can infer that the biuret-degrading capability is 

relatively common in microorganisms . This finding seems consistent with the older literature as 

discussed by TFI ; e.g . Nishihare et al . 1965, which I've not tried to find or read . Shapiretal2t0s .pdf Note also 

there seem to be several other works on biodegradability (in pure culture or by purified enzymes) of biuret, 

but you find them in the literature on triazine degradation and one would only know this if one knows a 

little about degradation pathways . 

On the basis of the analog argument (i .e . using isopropyl MDU data); plus the older literature as data 

detailed in TFI's dossier ; plus the assumed commonness of biuret-degrading capability, I suggest that 

biuret be assumed to be readily biodegradable, and the testing requirement dropped . 

Robert Boethling 

Exposure Assessment Branch 

US EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (7406M) 

Washington, DC 20460 

202-564-8533(P) 

202-564-8892(F) 

c.ra 

t rt 

CONTAINS NO CBI
Exhibit
4.74


 


Summary
of the First Amendment to Rural Partnership Agreement, entered into on Febuary 8, 2021, in connection with Fazenda Jatobá. 


 


Parties:
Imobiliária Jaborandi Ltda., as the owner of the land; Jaborandi Agrícola Ltda., as the operating company; and John Kudiess
and Harald Kudiess as the individuals interested in entering a rural partnership with the abovementioned companies.


 


Purpose:  Amend
the Rural Partnership Agreement, entered into on June 30, 2020, in connection with the possession
and exploitation of 3,386 arable hectares of Fazenda Jatobá, in order to (i)
ratify the existence of a reimbursement in the amount of R$666,689.99 that is pending in favor of John Kudiess and Harald Kudiess arising
out of investments performed by John Kudiess and Harald Kudiess under the Rural Partnership Agreement; and (ii) extend the maturity date
concerning such reimbursement to July, 2021.