alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COTTON STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       103,834,307
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       16,083,509
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         16,289,490
<EQUITIES>                                   1,503,233
<MORTGAGE>                                   3,009,382
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             137,178,748
<CASH>                                         535,669
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,439,414
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      37,853,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             182,959,952
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            118,650,592
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,754,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,543,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               182,959,952
<PREMIUMS>                                  10,988,809
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,504,356
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             207,616
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,655,984
<BENEFITS>                                   8,159,390
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,543,585
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         3,443,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,210,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,321,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COTTON STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       114,042,982
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       15,059,596
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         15,027,269
<EQUITIES>                                   3,708,419
<MORTGAGE>                                   2,275,746
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             147,094,563
<CASH>                                       1,248,678
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           4,945,346
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      45,870,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             204,780,346
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            131,231,149
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,754,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,287,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               204,780,346
<PREMIUMS>                                  19,282,311
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          7,425,283
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             237,485
<OTHER-INCOME>                               2,927,534
<BENEFITS>                                  13,905,360
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,165,874
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         5,466,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,335,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,625,679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,709,690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,709,690
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### HARRIS & JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Ralph D. WARD.

No. 45370.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 12, 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1969.

Greaves & Terry, Gulfport, for appellant.

Barnett & Barnett, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000106170
<NAME>WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                         PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                             355,408
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                           165,234
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                103,507
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                              450,903
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,075,052
<COMMON>                                               14,752
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                              93,816
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                    49,041
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                        157,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  15,000
<PREFERRED>                                            20,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                  197,349
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                    123,400
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                               0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                               1,500
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                             6,767
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                       21,077
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                        532,350
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                       1,075,052
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                             129,410
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                    1,802
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                            109,166
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                            114,628
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                14,782
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                        186
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                         18,628
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7,575
<NET-INCOME>                                           11,053
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                               700
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                          10,353
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                   0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 14,346
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64846-64847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32191]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing on December 18.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 64847]]

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a 
public hearing of the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board will 
be held on Thursday, December 18, 1997 from 1:00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. in 
room 7C13 of the General Accounting Office, 441 G St., N.W., 
Washington, D.C.
    The purpose of the hearing is to hear testimony from interested 
parties on Accounting for Internal Use Software. Those interested in 
testifying should contact Wendy Comes, Executive Director, no later 
than one week prior to the hearing. Also, they should at the same time 
provide a short biography and written copies of their testimony.
    Any interested person may attend the hearing as an observer. Board 
discussions and reviews are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy M. Comes, Executive Staff 
Director, 441 G St., N.W., Room 3B18, Washington, D.C. 20548, or call 
(202) 512-7357. E-Mail to: ComesW.<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e3e4f6e4e7c5e2e4eaabe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b5d5a485a597b5c5a54155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>. Fax: 202-512-7366.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86 Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 
U.S.C. app. section 10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

    Dated: December 3, 1997.
Wendy M. Comes,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-32191 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Joseph J. Sum, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Continental MaterialsCorporation;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and materials weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: November 11, 2005

 
|   | By:    | /s/  Joseph J. Sum                          |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Joseph  J. Sum                              |
|   |   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-31-2012

In Re: Keith Manfredi

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 12-2829

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Keith Manfredi " (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 629.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/629
1

ALD-232 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-2829

___________

IN RE: KEITH MANFREDI, Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

(Related to D.N.J. 12-cv-01905)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

July 19, 2012

Before: SLOVITER, FISHER and WEIS, Circuit

(Opinion filed: July 31, 2012)

Judges

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM.

Keith Manfredi petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the United 

States District Court for the District of New Jersey to rule on a motion for summary 

judgment. We will deny the petition as moot.

In March of 2012, Manfredi filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. §2241, challenging a prison disciplinary decision that resulted in the loss of 

good time credit. On May 14 2012, Manfredi filed a motion for summary judgment. On 

July 5, 2012, Manfredi filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting that we compel 
2

the District Court to grant him summary judgment. Meanwhile, the District Court 

ordered the United States to file an answer within thirty days on July 12, 2012, and 

denied Manfredi’s motion without prejudice on July 13, 2012 because it was filed 

prematurely. 

In light of the District Court decision, to the extent Manfredi is asking us to 

compel a ruling on his motion, the petition is denied as moot. See In re Orthopedic Bone 

Screw Prod. Liab. Litig., 94 F.3d 110 (3d Cir. 1996). To the extent that Manfredi seeks 

relief relating to the merits of the claims raised in his habeas petition, mandamus is not an 

alternative to an appeal. In re Chambers Dev. Co., Inc.

We will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. 

, 148 F.3d 214. (“A writ of 

mandamus should not be issued where relief may be obtained through an ordinary 

appeal”). Besides, the District Court has yet to rule on his §2241 petition.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Meeting: AIDS Research Advisory Committee, NIAID

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the AIDS Research Advisory Committee, National Institute of 
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, on January 28, 1998 in Conference Room 
1A1 in the Solar Building located at 6003 Executive Blvd, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. until 
adjournment. The AIDS Research Advisory Committee (ARAC) advises and 
makes recommendations to the Director, National Institute of Allergy 
and Infectious Diseases, on all aspects of research on HIV and AIDS 
related to the mission of the Division of AIDS (DAIDS).
    The Committee will provide advice on scientific priorities, policy, 
and program balance at the Division level. The Committee will review 
the progress and productivity of ongoing efforts, and identify critical 
gaps/obstacles to progress. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available.
    Ms. Rona L. Siskind, Executive Secretary , AIDS Research Advisory 
Committee, DAIDS, NIAID, NIH, Solar Building, Room 2A21, telephone 301-
435-3732, will provide a summary of the meeting and a roster of 
committee members upon request. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Siskind in advance of the 
meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health).

    Dated: December 10, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-32743 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00701-CR

Johnny Ferris aka Johnny Wayne Ferris, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. A-13-0162-SB, THE HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant Johnny Ferris, aka Johnny Wayne Ferris, of the felony

offense of evading detention with a vehicle, see Tex. Penal Code § 38.04(a), (b)(2), and, pursuant

to the habitual offender punishment provision of the Penal Code, assessed his punishment at 99 years

in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, see id. § 12.42(d).

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements

of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988).
The record reflects that appellant’s counsel provided a copy of the brief to appellant

along with a letter advising appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se

brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766. This Court also gave appellant an

additional 30 days to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief or other written response has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record and find no reversible error. 

See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious

grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial

court’s judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Affirmed

Filed: June 24, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Section 302
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer I, William J. Barlow, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cotton States Life
Insurance Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and;  5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board
of directors;  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: November 11, 2004 /s/ William J. BarlowWilliam J. BarlowVice President of Finance and Assistant Treasurer