alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32   Certifications   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of American General Finance, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|      |                                                   |                          |  |  | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ |  |  | 
|      | /s/                                               | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|      |                                                   | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|      | President and Chief Executive Officer             |                         
|      | /s/                                               | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      |                                                   | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |                         
|Date: | August 11, 2010                                   |                          |  | 

81
#### LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sidney T. BOGARDUS et al., Appellees.

No. 77-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1978.

Theodore R. Bayer, Miami, for appellant.

Mahoney, Hadlow & Adams and Paul C. Huck, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

*855PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Merritt v. Unkefer,*223 So.2d 723 (Fla.1969); and *Gancedo Lumber Company, Inc. v. Flagship First National Bank of Miami Beach,*340 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Cf. *Chase Manhattan Bank v. S/D Enterprises, Inc.,*353 So.2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); and *J. G. Plumbing Service, Inc. v. Coastal Mortgage Company,*329 So.2d 393 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

 
 (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 
 
 (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 
 
  Simmons Bank,  Trustee for Hugoton Royalty TrustMarch 12, 2018  By /S/ LEE ANN ANDERSON   Lee Ann Anderson   Senior Vice President**
First Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending 

January 1 – March 31, 2019 

Board 

Approval 

Date 

Country Amount Type U.S. Position Background 

3/11 Ecuador SDR 3.035 billion 

US$ 4.2 billion 

Request for an Extended 

Arrangement Under the 

Extended Fund Facility (EFF) 

Support https://www.imf.org/en/ 

News/Articles/2019/03/1 

1/ecuador-pr1972-imfexecutive-boardapproves-eff-for-ecuador 

3/20 Ghana SDR 132.84 million 

US$ 185.2 million 

Seventh and Eighth Reviews 

Under the Extended Credit 

Facility (ECF) Arrangement 

Abstain https://www.imf.org/en/ 

News/Articles/2019/03/2 

0/pr1983-ghana-imfexecutive-boardcompletes-the-lastreview-of-extendedcredit-facility-for-ghana
Exhibit
4.83


 


Summary
of the Rural Partnership Agreement, entered into on May 12, 2021, in connection with Fazenda Chaparral.


 


Parties:
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, as the current company vested in the possession of the land,
Paulimar Batista Alvarenga, as the natural individual interested in entering into a rural partnership with Brasilagro Companhia Brasileira
de Propriedades Agrícolas economic group, and Imobiliária Cajueiro Ltda., as owner of the land.


 


Purpose: Granting
of the possession, for seventeen months, of a total area equivalent to 1,842.16 arable hectares of Fazenda Chaparral on behalf of Mr.
Paulimar Batista Alvarenga for purposes of the exploitation of the land under a rural partnership regime, by means of the sharing, by
and among the parties, of the earnings received from the crops/harvests arising from the aforementioned partnership. Mr. Paulimar
Batista Alvarenga shall be entitled to approximately 87% of the earnings therefrom (pre-fixed at an average of 7 bags of soybean per
hectare, and Brasilagro Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas shall be entitled to the remaining 13% of the earnings
therefrom.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MARGIE BLOOM, ADMINISTRATOR FOR 

DARON RHASHAWN TROLLINGER,

Petitioner

v.

MORRIS ALAN, EDWARDSVILLE 

ASSOCIATES, EDWARDSVILLE 

APARTMENTS MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

EDWARDSVILLE APARTMENTS, LP, 

AND EAGLE RIDGE APARTMENTS, 

INC.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 254 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 99.7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Bellatrix Exploration Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond G. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of the operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:   March 21, 2013 |                                       | 
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------- | 
|                       |                                       | 
|                       | /s/ Raymond G. Smith                  | 
|                       | Raymond G. Smith                      | 
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer |
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Kirk A. Waldron, Chief Financial Officer of SMTEKInternational, Inc., certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of SMTEK International, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4.               I am responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               I have disclosed,based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

1

----

 

b.              Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 8, 2004 |
|------------------------|
|                   |   |
| By:                    | /s/ Kirk A. Waldron |   |
|                   | Kirk A. Waldron |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                   | SMTEK International, Inc. |

 

2

----
Exhibit 10.7


 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	2	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	3	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	4	 



     


    

 


 


 




    	 	5	 



     


    

 


 

 






    	 	6	 



     


    

 


 

 






    	 	7	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	8	 



     


    

 


 

 


 


 



    	 	9	 



     


    


 

 


 


 


 






    	 	10	 



     


    

 


 

 


 


 


 






    	 	11	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	12	 



     


    

 


 


 



    	 	13
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Edgen Murray II, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), we, Daniel J. OLeary, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and David L. Laxton, III, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge and belief, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 24, 2011/s/ Daniel J. OLearyDaniel J. OLeary
President and Principal Executive Officer/s/ David L. Laxton, IIIDavid L. Laxton, III Principal
Financial Officer
Opinion issued September 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00390-CV

———————————

JOHN T. PRESTON AND C CHANGE INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellants

V.

EMJO INVESTMENTS, LTD. AND H.J. VON DER GOLTZ, Appellees

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2011-44058

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants John T. Preston and C Change Investments, LLC have filed an 

unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we 

grant the motion, remove the appeal from the Court’s submission docket, and 
2

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). We dismiss any other pending 

motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Financial Literacy and Education Commission Public Meeting 

November 18, 2015 9:00 am – 11:30 am

U.S. Department of the Treasury – Cash Room

Agenda

Preparing for Financial Security through Saving and Investing

Opening Remarks

 Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of the Treasury

 Richard Cordray, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

 Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

Presentation: myRA

Richard Ludlow, myRA Director, US Department of the Treasury

Panel: From Savings to Investing – What We Know and Where We Can Go

Moderated by: Lori J. Schock, Director, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, United States 

Securities & Exchange Commission

Leandro Carvalho, Professor of Economics, Pardee RAND Graduate School, University of 

Southern California

Gary Mottola, Research Director, FINRA Investor Education Foundation

Will Tucker, Behavioral and Social Sciences Team, White House Office of Science and 

Technology Policy

Commission Discussion and Announcements 

Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. PR98-2-000]


Magnolia Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Petition for Rate 
Approval

December 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 21, 1997, Magnolia Pipeline 
Corporation (Magnolia), filed a petition for rate approval, pursuant to 
Section 311 of the Natural Gas Act, Section 284.123(b)(2) of the 
Commission's Regulations, and the Commission's March 31, 1995 letter 
order in Docket No. PR95-1-000, requesting that the Commission approve 
the continued use of Magnolia's current maximum rate of $0.1621 per 
Dth, plus reimbursement of actual fuel use up to three percent for 
Section 311 transportation services performed on Magnolia's system.
    Magnolia states that it is an intrastate pipeline within the 
meaning of Section 2(16) of the NGPA and it owns and operates pipeline 
facilities within the State of Alabama. Magnolia states that its 
current maximum transportation unit rate is based on a levelized cost 
of service. Magnolia states that even if it were able to collect its 
current maximum rate, Magnolia would not recover its total cost of 
service. Thus Magnolia only seeks approval to continue to be able to 
charge up to its existing approved maximum rates. Magnolia proposes an 
effective date on and after November 22, 1997.
    Pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2)(ii), if the Commission does not 
act within 150 days of the filing date, the rate will be deemed to be 
fair and equitable and not in excess of an amount which interstate 
pipelines would be permitted to charge for similar transportation 
service. The Commission may, prior to the expiration of the 150-day 
period, extend the time for action or institute a proceeding to afford 
parties an opportunity for written comments and for the oral 
presentation of views, data, and arguments.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 
385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All 
motions must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission on or before 
December 23, 1997. The petition for rate approval is on file with the 
Commission and is available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32502 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE 

Guw rnor 

STATE Of WASHINGTON 

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 

p.o. Box 40002 • Olympia, Washington 98504-0002 • (360) 753-6780 • www.governor.wa.gov 

June 28, 2011 

Mr. Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 

1200 61h Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, Washington 98101-3140 

RE: Placement ofthe Bremerton Gasworks Site on the National Priorities List 

Dear Mr. McLerran: 

Thank you for your letter ofMay 18,2011, to Ted Sturdevant, Director ofthe Washington 

State Department of Ecology (Ecology), regarding inclusion ofthe Bremerton Gasworks 

Site on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). 

After reviewing the facts and communicating with local stakeholders, my staff has 

recommended our concurrence. Therefore, pursuant to Section lOS of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. Section 

9605, this letter serves as official documentation of Washington State' s concurrence with 

placement ofthe Bremerton Gasworks Site on the National Priorities List. 

Placing this site on the National Priorities List is a critical step toward protecting the 

waters of Puget Sound. If you have any questions, please contact Ted Sturdevant at (360) 

407-7001. 

Sincerely, 

~A.(J;" Christine O. Gregoire 

Governor 

cc: Ted Sturdevant, Director, Washington Department of Ecology
#### Patricia S. HAWVER, Appellant, v. John Chancellor HAWVER, Appellee.

No. 73-186.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Jack MONROE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PUBLISHING COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 39885.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          11,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,092
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,711
<PP&E>                                          14,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,174
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,904
<SALES>                                         10,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,159
<CGS>                                            7,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (119)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,455)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,277)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
# Monthly_MDB_Voting_Records_2012

&"Times New Roman,Bold"&14MDB Votes June 2012	

Page &P

# image1.emf
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**I, Kenneth E. Wolf, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       */s/ Kenneth E. Wolf*         *Name: Kenneth E. Wolf*    *Title: Chief Financial Officer*    *Date: May 16, 2065*  A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and willbe retained by Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
32