alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jonathan C. Clark, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2010-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.
Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by Great Lakes Education Loan Services,
Inc., as subservicer, ACS Education Services, Inc., as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date:
March 23, 2012



|                                                                      |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Jonathan C. Clark                                                 |  | 
|Jonathan C. Clark                                                     |  | 
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC                                                       |  |
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

OLRILD c. MANN 

?hrch 29, 1939 

. ..- .=*aHonorable R. E. Beasleg 

County Auditor, Collin County 

Fdcl(inney, Texas 

Deer sir: 
Honorable R. $. Beasley, ?&arch 29, 1939, Page 2 

A review of the statutes controlling these matters, 

setting them forth in their chronol.ogloal order, shows that 

the 44th Legislature in 1935 enaoted Article 2746b, same 

being a general statute applylng to school districts, both 

oommon and Independent. The act in question repealed by 

implication both Artioles 2776 and 2746 In so far as they 

conflicted with it. Said aot beoams efieotive 3kroh 22, 

1935, and from that date until the amendment of Artiole 2746 

by the 45th Legislature, effeotive April 29, 1937, all expense 

inourred in connection with or incidental to any school dlstriot eleotion was payable out of the available maintenance 

Suad belonging to such district. 

Arttole 3746, both bef’ore and after axmdaant, partainsdoalytoMwwa 8OhOO1di8tWiOt8, and~rodd8datkr 

w ill 1937 that the bleOtic0 jUdg88 (b OOlrnOIL 8OhOO1 

di8triOt8) 8hall be paid Out or the &YXLera& fund Of th0 

oouaty in whleh 8ald slmotionwae hsld and it re 

the& extent the portion of Artlolls 27Mb.in oo hid lot with 

oalod 00 

it in W far a8 O-11 8OhOO1 di8tridt8 8X0 OOZiO8r~~. 

9-U-8 W&F lffpr? 

ATTo& OERERAL OF TEXAE 

EpS:AAQ’! 

w 

A88i8tcUlt 

-k
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Raymond MATTHEWS v. STATE of Louisiana et al.

No. 51160.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 1971.

In re: Raymond Matthews applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application is denied. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
The Effects of Ultra-Low Sulfur 


Gasoline on Emissions from Tier 2 


Vehicles in the In-Use Fleet 


Final Report
 

Appendix A


 Details of On-Road Mileage 


Accumulation Route
 

Assessment and Standards Division 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

NOTICE 

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or 

positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data that 

are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments. 

EPA-420-R-14-002 

March 2014 
Appendix A. Details of On-Road Mileage Accumulation Route
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4059000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9440000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    151000
<INVENTORY>                                    3104000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              24123000
<PP&E>                                        24541000
<DEPRECIATION>                                17792000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                33976000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         19078000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        341000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     7621000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  33976000
<SALES>                                       14065000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              14065000
<CGS>                                         11783000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 13601000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              242000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 254000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     22000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             254000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    232000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        


</TABLE>
#### Quinton Bederead BASS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40448.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 8, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 90.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



/s/ Charles W. Shivery

(Signature)

Charles W. Shivery

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ David R. McHale

(Signature)

David R. McHale

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



November 4, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Santaro Interactive Entertainment 10-K





Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Santaro Interactive Entertainment Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Dong Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated this 30th day of March, 2011.








/s/ Dong Yan


Dong Yan, Chief Financial Officer
Bair, Sheila

Le ee ac cc nel

From: Combs Ann [combs-ann@dol.gov]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:40 PM
To: ‘Sheila.Bair@do.treas.gov’

Subject: trying to return your phone call
[OUTSIDE SCOPE]

Probably more urgent, Enron. [(b)(5) , (b)(7)]

. We have also been
working on possible legislative options that we will share with the new Task
Force the President named today. I'll be accompanying Sec Chao to the
meeting with Secs O'Neill and Evans tomorrow.

[OUTSIDE SCOPE]

Ann

01200000000854
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2619 

To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the entities will 

not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity that performs, 

an abortion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2021 

Mrs. FISCHBACH (for herself, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. ADERHOLT, 

Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. MANN, Mr. ALLEN, 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. HUDSON, 

Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BABIN, 

Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. WALTZ, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. 

LATURNER, Mr. EMMER, Mrs. MCCLAIN, Mr. ROSE, Mr. HARRIS, Mrs. 

LESKO, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. BUDD, Mr. OWENS, and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify 

the entities will not perform, or provide any funding 

to any other entity that performs, an abortion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Life and 

5 Taxpayers Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2619 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ABORTION. 

2 (a) PROHIBITION.—No Federal funds may be pro3 vided (directly or indirectly, including through contract or 

4 subcontract) to an entity unless the entity certifies that, 

5 during the period for which such funds are provided, the 

6 entity will not perform, and will not provide any funds 

7 to any other entity that performs, an abortion. 

8 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply with 

9 respect to an abortion where— 

10 (1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or in11 cest; or 

12 (2) a physician certifies that the woman suffers 

13 from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical 

14 illness that would place the woman in danger of 

15 death unless an abortion is performed, including a 

16 life-threatening physical condition caused by or aris17 ing from the pregnancy itself. 

18 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the term ‘‘entity’’ 

19 means the entire legal entity, including any entity that 

20 controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with 

21 such entity. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Jay B. KURTZ, Jr., and Kathleen M. Kurtz, Appellants, v. S. M. IRWIN, doing business as Custom Engine Service, Appellee.

No. 70-1098.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 1, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1971.

*483Chandler F. Culver, Miami, for appellants.

Ralph H. Bearden, Jr., and Joseph A. Ruszkowski, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., CHARLES CARROLL, J., and ADAMS, ALTO, Associate Judge.

ADAMS, ALTO, Associate Judge.

This appeal brings for review a summary final judgment.

A suit was brought by the appellee to recover for parts and services expended in the repair of the appellants’ boat. The appellants gave a check for the bill and took the boat and stopped payment on the check. Suit was brought for the services rendered equal to the amount of the check.

Appellants filed a general denial, whereupon motion for summary judgment for the plaintiff was made. Supporting the motion was an affidavit of the plaintiff substantiating the allegations in the complaint. The motion for summary final judgment was filed on June 29, 1970, supported by the affidavit of the plaintiff filed June 24, 1970. On August 3, 1970, the defendants filed an affidavit in support of their defense, reciting and pointing out the defects in the workmanship and justifying their failure to honor the check. On September 1, 1970, the trial court entered a summary final judgment for the plaintiff.

The rule has long been settled in this jurisdiction that summary judgments are improper where there is a showing of an issue to be tried, such as appears in this case. This rule has long since been settled in the case of Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40; Shollenberger v. Baskin, FlaApp.1969, 227 So.2d 79.

Hence, the summary final judgment i¡ reversed with directions to proceed not inconsistent with these views.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Part 255

[Docket No. 96-4 CARP DPRA]


Mechanical and Digital Phonorecord Delivery Rate Adjustment 
Proceeding

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document clarifies the dates for filing comments and 
Notices of Intent to Participate published in the Federal Register 
notice of December 1, 1997, announcing a proposed rulemaking concerning 
the adjustment of the physical phonorecord and digital phonorecord 
delivery royalty rates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya M. Sandros, Attorney Advisor, 
Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP), P.O. Box 70977, Southwest 
Station, Washington, D.C. 20024. Telephone (202) 707-8380. Telefax: 
(202) 707-8366.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of proposed rulemaking concerning 
the adjustment of royalty rates for the making and distribution of a 
physical phonorecord and a digital phonorecord delivery contains two 
dates for filing comments and Notices of Intent to Participate. The 
correct date, December 29, 1997, is announced in the date caption. The 
second date, December 31, 1997, stated in the section entitled, 
Comments and Notices of Intent to Participate, page 63507, third 
column, is incorrect and should also read December 29, 1997.

    Dated: December 11, 1997.
Marilyn J. Kretsinger,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-32791 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-33-P
<PAGE> 37

                                                                  Exhibit 32


                            Certifications


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 of American General Finance, Inc. as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of, Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          f operations of the Company.



                                 /s/  Frederick W. Geissinger
                                      Frederick W. Geissinger
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer


                                 /s/  Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.
                                      Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.
                                 Senior Vice President and
                                   Chief Financial Officer


Date:  August 3, 2004
NUMBER 13-22-00191-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

MISSION CONSOLIDATED 

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Appellant,

v.

FRANCISCO GARCIA SR.

AND MARIA GARCIA, Appellees.

 

On appeal from the 206th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

On May 26, 2021, appellees Francisco Garcia, Sr. and Maria Garcia filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus in the trial court. Appellant Mission Consolidated Independent 

School District filed a plea to the jurisdiction. The trial court denied the plea, and appellant 
2

appealed.

On November 11, 2022, appellees filed a “Motion For Nonsuit Without Prejudice,” 

stating they “no longer desire[] to prosecute their cause of action against [appellant], and 

requested a Non-suit without prejudice.” Appellees requested this Court “enter a nonsuit 

on all claims against” appellant. We requested a response, and on December 5, 2022, 

appellants responded: “These appellees who filed no brief now seek the right to relief. 

They want to nonsuit their entire dispute so endeth the entire beef.”

We construe appellees’ motion for nonsuit as a motion to dismiss the appeal, and 

we construe appellant’s response as unopposed. Having considered the documents on 

file and the unopposed motion, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be 

granted, and the appeal should be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Accordingly, 

we grant the appellees’ unopposed motion to dismiss, and the appeal is hereby 

dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

1

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

8th day of December, 2022.

1 On November 21, 2022, appellees filed a motion for extension of time to file a brief. Because 

we dismiss the appeal, we dismiss appellees’ motion for extension of time as moot.
----

**Exhibit        32.2**

| (1)    | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |

|   | /s/                  Robert Scott Lorimer |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert                  Scott Lorimer,    |   |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer  |   |
|   | May                  15, 2006             |   |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6165
RICHARD A. BRYANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; BUREAU OF PRISONS; KATHLEEN HAWK, Director, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-1049-5-H) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard A. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bryant v. United States Dep't of Justice , No. CA-95-1049-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.4

﻿

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

﻿

I, Douglas L. Martin, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

|  | 1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K of SB/RH Holdings, LLC (the “registrant”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017; |
|--|----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: January 23, 2018 

 

﻿

| ﻿                |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Douglas L. Martin   |
| Douglas L. Martin       |
| Chief Financial Officer |

﻿

----