### 59179 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 186 / Monday, September 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules

Declassification Office, DJP5, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6884, Fort George G. Meade, MD
20755–6884.

(17) U.S. Africa Command. U.S. Africa Command, Unit 29951, APO AE 09751–9951.

(18) U.S. Central Command. U.S. Central Command, Attention: CCJ6–RDD, 7115 South Boundary Blvd., MacDill AFB, FL 33621–
5101.

(19) U.S. European Command. U.S. European Command, Attention: ECJ1–AX, Unit 30400, APO AE 09131.

(20) U.S. Joint Forces Command. U.S. Joint Forces Command, Code J024, 1562 Mitscher Ave., Suite 200, Norfolk, VA 23511–2488.

(21) U.S. Northern Command. U.S. Northern Command, HQ USNORTHCOM/ CSM, 250 Vandenberg Street, Suite B016, Peterson AFB, CO 80914–3804.

(22) U.S. Pacific Command. U.S. Pacific Command, Attention: J151 FOIA, Box 64017, Camp Smith, HI 96861–4017.

(23) U.S. Southern Command. U.S. Southern Command, Attention: SCJ1–A (FOIA), 3511 NW 91st Avenue, Miami, FL
33172–1217.

(24) U.S. Special Operations Command. U.S. Special Operations Command, Attention: SOCS–SJS–SI (FOIA), 7701 Tampa Point Blvd., MacDill AFB, FL 33621–5323.

(25) U.S. Strategic Command. U.S. Strategic Command, Attention: CS50, 901 SAC Blvd., STE 1C17, Offutt AFB, NE 68113–
6000.

(26) U.S. Transportation Command. U.S. Transportation Command, Chief, Resources Information, Communications, and Records Management, Attention: TCJ6–RII, 508 Scott Drive, Bldg. 1961, Scott AFB, IL 62225–5357.

Dated: September 20, 2010. Patricia L. Toppings, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010–24094 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0657; FRL–9205–7]**

**Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;**  **Michigan; PSD Regulations**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA proposes to approve revisions to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA). The revisions serve to meet specific requirements of the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) construction permit program in Michigan. Michigan has submitted two SIP revisions pertaining to the ‘‘net emission increase’’ definition and the ‘‘reasonable possibility’’ recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and EPA has found the revisions acceptable.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before October 27, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2010–0657, by one of the following methods:

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

2. E-mail: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The regional office official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to submit
comments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–4447, blakley.pamela@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will withdraw the final rule and will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register

.

Dated: September 11, 2010. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2010–23983 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0484; FRL–9206–1]**

**Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;**  **Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible**  **Packaging Printing**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland. This SIP revision includes amendments to Maryland’s regulation for Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes, and meets the requirement to adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for sources covered by EPA’s Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for flexible packaging printing. These amendments will reduce emissions of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from flexible packaging printing. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received in writing by October 27, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA–