alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Martin. Michael (OST)

Subject: " :I, i ,l.j Martin, Michael (OST)

, ,:,-('., r: >;-"'(:.; Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:58 PM Tim Hite (t36h@aol.com); (ranellfenchak@flyjohnstownairport.com); William Schirf 

## 3 "(~ouncil@altoonapa.gov) Dave Hackett (dhackett@gosunair.com); Daniel Helland (daniel@boutiqueair.com); Jamie Kogutek (Jamie.Kogutek@silverairways.com); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); josh@citylinkair.com EAS proposals at Altoona and Johnstown, PA -community comments due Thursday, June 19 REVISED- Boutique EAS Proposal AOO & JNS May 2014.pdf; REVISED- CityLink EAS Proposal AOO May 2014.pdf; REVISED- CityLink EAS Proposal JNS May 2014.pdf; REVISED- Silver EAS Proposal AOO & JNS May 2014.pdf; REVISED- SunAir EAS Proposal AOO & JNS - May 2014.pdf From: 

### Sent: To: Cc:

Attachments:

Everyone: On May 14, 2014, the Department issued a Notice allowing the air carriers that had submitted proposals in response to the most recent Request for Proposals at Altoona and Johnstown to resubmit a revised proposal, if they wished to do so. All four carriers that had originally submitted proposals re-submitted revised ones. I have attached the revised proposals for your review. The new due date for community comments isThursday, June 19. Please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list. Feel free to contact me if you have questions. Regards, Michael Martin United States Department of Transportation Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) (202) 366-6494

1
#### EASTERN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION v. EGAN.

No. 38384.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 218 So.2d 544.
#### ST. SOPHIA GREEK ORTHODOX COMMUNITY, a Florida corporation, not for profit, et al., Appellants, v. Peter VAMVAKS et al., Appellees.

No. 69-837.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 24, 1970.

*547Cushman & Cushman, Miami, for appellants.

Walters, Moore & Costanzo, Hendricks & Hendricks, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ., and SPECTOR, SAM, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This matter having been considered upon the record, briefs and oral argument and it appearing the appellants have failed to demonstrate any error in the partial summary judgment entered by the trial court, the said judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.0

| (1)   | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 8, 2008      (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                            |   |                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/Renato      Cataldo                          |   | /s/Dale      Heins                                                             |
| Renato      Cataldo                             |   | Dale      Heins                                                                |
| President      and Chief      Executive Officer |   | Senior      Vice President, Finance,Chief Financial Officer and      Treasurer |
#### Jerome SPEARMAN v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46013.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 9, 1970.

Bill Joyner, Batesville, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Timmie Hancock, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
DANIEL JOHN LEVITAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4060

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Summa, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

SEP 13 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL P. PAALAN,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 99-3220

v. (D. Kansas)

COLONEL MICHEAL A. LANSING,

Respondent - Appellee.

(D.C. No. CV-98-3436-RDR)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Michael P. Paalan, a prisoner at the United States Disciplinary Barracks in

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, appeals the district court’s dismissal, without
1Mr. Paalan also seeks a certificate of appealability. However, that

requirement does not apply to § 2441 petitions. Bradshaw v. Story, 86 F.3d 164,

166 (10th Cir. 1996).

-2-

prejudice, of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2441. 1

 The dismissal was based on the fact that Mr. Paalan’s appeal of his trial

by general court-martial and conviction, and, inter alia , for premeditated murder,

is currently pending before the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals. 

Thus, Mr. Paalan has not yet exhausted his available remedies. See Khan v. Hart ,

943 F.2d 1261, 1263 (10th Cir. 1991); Capps v. Sullivan , 13 F.3d 350, 354 n.2

(10th Cir. 1993).

Mr. Paalan does not dispute the fact that his appeals are ongoing in the

military courts. Rather, he argues that federal courts should intervene because, he

asserts, the military courts have, at all relevant times, lacked jurisdiction over

him, and because his case demonstrates both special merit and hardship. He also

contends that the long delay by the military courts in resolving his appeal

warrants immediate federal court intervention. The district court did not err in

declining to do so.

Our habeas jurisdiction to review a military conviction is limited even

when the habeas petition is filed at the appropriate time. See Burns v. Wilson ,

346 U.S. 137, 142-44 (1976); Lips v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks ,
-3-

997 F.2d 808, 811 (10th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1091 (1994); Khan v.

Hart , 943 F.2d 1261, 1262-63 (10th Cir. 1991).

This petition is premature. The military courts must first decide the issues,

including the issue of jurisdiction, raised by Mr. Paalan.

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge
#### Marie W. SHARPE, Petitioner, v. CECO CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 40759.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 21, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 464.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2020*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter 454.33

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE^

3-Year Note 7/15 46.00 2.00

10-Year Note (r) 7/15 29.00 4.00

30-Year Bond (r) 7/15 19.00 2.00 54.37 39.63

2-Year FRN 7/31 24.00 2.00

10-Year TIPS 7/31 14.00 0.00

2-Year Note 7/31 48.00 2.00

5-Year Note 7/31 49.00 2.00

7-Year Note 7/31 44.00 3.00

20-Year Bond (r) 7/31 17.00 17.00 132.79 63.21

3-Year Note 8/17 48.00 2.00

10-Year Note 8/17 36.00 4.00

30-Year Bond 8/17 25.00 3.00 49.52 59.48

2-Year FRN (r) 8/28 22.00 2.00 0.00 22.00

30-Year TIPS (r) 8/31 7.00 0.00

2-Year Note 8/31 50.00 2.00

5-Year Note 8/31 51.00 2.00

7-Year Note 8/31 47.00 3.00

20-Year Bond 8/31 22.00 2.00 86.89 90.11

3-Year Note 9/15 50.00 2.00

10-Year Note (r) 9/15 33.00 4.00

30-Year Bond (r) 9/15 22.00 3.00 19.56 85.44

2-Year FRN (r) 9/25 22.00 2.00 0.00 22.00

10-Year TIPS (r) 9/30 12.00 0.00

2-Year Note 9/30 52.00 2.00

5-Year Note 9/30 53.00 2.00

7-Year Note 9/30 50.00 3.00

20-Year Bond (r) 9/30 19.00 2.00 75.20 110.80

911.00 418.33 492.67

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 947

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 08/03/2020 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2545 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the role 

of doctors of podiatric medicine in the Department of 

Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2545 RFS

1 SECTION 1. ROLE OF DOCTORS OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE 

2 IN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

3 (a) CLARIFICATION OF ROLE.—Section 7306 of title 

4 38, United States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘a Direc7 tor of Podiatric Service,’’; 

8 (B) by redesignating paragraph (10) as 

9 paragraph (11); and 

10 (C) by inserting after paragraph (9) the 

11 following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(10) A Podiatric Medical Director, who shall 

13 be a qualified doctor of podiatric medicine and who 

14 shall be responsible to the Under Secretary for 

15 Health for the operation of the Podiatric Service.’’; 

16 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘podiatric 

17 medicine,’’ after ‘‘doctors of medicine,’’; and 

18 (3) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘and (8)’’ and 

19 inserting ‘‘(8), and (10)’’. 

20 (b) CLARIFICATION OF PAY GRADE.—Section 7404 

21 of title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

22 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ‘‘, podia23 trists,’’ after ‘‘physicians’’ ; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2545 RFS

1 (2) in subsection (b), in the first heading of the 

2 list following the colon, by striking ‘‘PODIATRIST’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘PODIATRIST (DPM)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Fred LITTLE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 28, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J.'Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Thomas M. Carney, Stephen R. Koons and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s original direct appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed upon conviction of breaking and entering a dwelling *125house with intent to commit a felony, to-wit, grand larceny, and grand larceny was frustrated by an untimely filed notice of appeal by court appointed counsel.

We grant petitioner a belated review of the judgment and sentence equivalent to a direct appeal by means of this habeas corpus proceeding. Henninger v. State, 230 So.2d 149 (Fla.1970).

We dispense with oral argument pursuant to F.A.R. 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A. We have examined the briefs and record, and conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed and ha-beas corpus denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

WALDEN, CROSS -and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Docket No. FAA-2013-0330
Exhibit 12   AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)    Three Months EndedNine Months EndedSeptember 30,September 30,(dollars in thousands)2007200620072006Earnings:
Income before provision for income taxes$  70,961$138,503$   138,647$   508,589Interest expense315,990306,420936,049862,155Implicit interest in rents5,5805,18216,50615,388Total earnings$392,531$450,105$1,091,202$1,386,132Fixed charges:
Interest expense$315,990$306,420$   936,049$   862,155Implicit interest in rents5,5805,18216,50615,388Total fixed charges$321,570$311,602$   952,555$   877,543Ratio of earnings to fixed charges1.221.441.151.58    43
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            2742
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (914)
<INVENTORY>                                       1872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 48538
<PP&E>                                          466093
<DEPRECIATION>                                   91453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  456818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            79095
<BONDS>                                         141840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1044
<COMMON>                                          9002
<OTHER-SE>                                      102038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    456818
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 23407
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    16617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (377)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3458
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2159
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
277 treaters filed at least one report

321114 252

321113 12

321212 1

321912 2

321999 7

INVALID 3 (all are 321114)

46 Creosote 102 As or As Compounds

34 Benzo(ghi)perylene 104 Cr or Cr Compounds

57 PACs 216 Cu or Cu Compounds

22 Pentachlorophenol 25 Pb or Pb Compounds

16 Hexachlorobenzene 14 Methanol

28 DDLC 2 Ammonia

3 Anthracene 1 Cumene

3 Dibenzofuran 1 Diisocyanates

4 Naphthalene 1 Mercury Compounds

3 Phenanthrene 1 MIBK

2 Styrene 11 Sodium Nitrite

1 Formaldehyde 1 Xylene

Reporting Facility Breakdown, by NAICS Code

TRI Reporting Summary - CY 2007

Number of Reports Filed, by Chemical
<PAGE>   1



                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-72949) on Form S-8 of Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated
February 23, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Central
Illinois Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statement of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, which report appears in the December 31,
1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.



                                             /s/ STRIEGEL KNOBLOCH & COMPANY LLC


Bloomington, Illinois
April 1, 1999


                                       66
2800 S. Andrews Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 Phone: 954.320.5367 Fax: 305.423.3246 Email: jcanny@amerijet.com April 30 , 2013 Submitted electronically via r egulations. gov U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M

- 30 West Building ground floor

Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington D.C. 20590

Re: Amerijet International, Inc.

- Exemption No. 9469B (FAA

- 2005

- 22192)

Dear Sir or Madam:

The purpose of this letter is to request an extension of Exemption No. 9469B (FAA

- 2005

- 22192), which was last granted to Amerijet International, Inc. ("Amerijet'') on June 20, 2011

.

Amerijet filed its initial Petition for an exemption from § 121.434(c)(l)(ii) of Title 14 on August

18, 2005

, to allow Amerijet to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA
inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) while that PIC is performing prescribed duties
during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing when completing initial or upgrade
training as specified in§ 121.434. Ameri jet's Petition was not opposed by any party and was approved by
the FAA on September 15, 2005. Subsequent two

- year extensions were app roved on September 10,

2007, September 2, 2009 , and June 20, 2011

. The current extension terminates September 30, 2013.

Amerijet has continued to use the exemption and has been able to realize the substantial benefits it
anticipated when it first filed its petition in 2005. Moreover, use of the exemption has not resulted in any
adverse consequences. In short, all of the public interest justifications Amerijet advanced in support of its
Petition have been achieved, and it can reasonably be expected that each will continue to be achieved if
the exemption is extended. In addition, the extension of the exception reasonably c annot be expected to
diminish in any way the ability of the FAA to maintain the same level of safety oversight regarding
Amerijet that it observes right now and under the rule from which the exemption has been granted.

Accordingly, Amerijet contends that i t would be in the public interest , would not adversely affect safety

but would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which Amerijet seeks the exemption

, for the FAA to extend the exemption for another two years, subject to the same conditions previously imposed. Respectfully submitted,

s / Joan M. Canny_________
Joan M. Canny

Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Amerijet International, Inc.

cc : Mr. Jo hn M. Allen
Director, Flight Standards Service
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130758 & (28) (33) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 130758 

 COA: 262516 
 Wayne CC: 98-013443-01

HUBERT MARTIN MARSHALL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motions to remand and to hold in abeyance are DENIED. 

s0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Mailing: 

The News Journal 

PO Box 15505 

Wilmington, DE 19850 

Street 

111e News Joumal 

950 W. Basin Road 

New Castle, DE 19720 

(302l324-2500 

The News Journal 

Sunday News Journal 

l11e News Journal 

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 

STATE OF DELAWARE COUNTY OF NEW CASTLE 

Personally appeared before me this 24th day of August, 2009: 

I, Kristin Segner, of the NEWS JOURNAL COMPANY, a daily newspaper printed and 

published in the County of New Castle County, State of Delaware, who, being duly sworn states 

that the advertisement of SID DNREC Air Ouality Management Section - Legal Notice-Notice 

of Public Hearing 

was published in THE NEWS JOURNAL on 

and/or THE SUNDAY NEWS JOURNAL on 

N/A 

August 23, 2009 

QM~. Legal Coordinator 

ame Title 

Sworn to before me this 24th day of August, 2009 

Notary Public 

Wanda James 

Notary Public 

State of Delaware 

Commission expires 11102/2012
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Estate of F.J. Leonards, Deceased

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00222

- CV

Trial court case number: P03986A

Trial court: County Court of Chambers County

Th e reporter’s record was due on April 13, 2020

. According to the information provided

to the Court by the court reporter, appellant will not be providing a reporter’s record. If appellant

does not request and make financial arrangements for the filing o f th e reporter’s record, this

Court will consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record

for a decision. 

### See T EX



### . R. A PP



### . P. 37.3(c).

If appellant does plan to provide a reporter’s record, appellant must respond t o th e C ourt

within 10 days of the date of this notice with proof of payment to the court reporter or the Court

will order appellant’s brief filed without the benefit of a reporter’s record.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_________ /s/ Russell Lloyd

_______ _____________ Acting individuall y

Date: April 21, 2020
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cotton States Life Insurance Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Ridley Howard, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                             /s/   J. Ridley Howard
Date: 8/12/04                             -------------------------------------
                                          J. Ridley Howard
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer