alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.    /s/
Charles W. ShiveryCharles W. ShiveryChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer    /s/
David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  May 8, 2009    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50542

Conference Calendar

 

LISTON RANDOLPH POSEY, II,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WALTER S. SMITH, Judge; UNNAMED U.S. ATTORNEY,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-99-CV-135-JN

--------------------

February 18, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Liston Randolph Posey, II, federal prisoner # 02528-095,

appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action filed

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Posey argues that John Phinizy, the

Assistant United States Attorney named as a defendant, acted

without jurisdiction and in violation of Posey’s due process

rights by filing a motion to dispose of Posey’s property seized

when he was arrested. Posey argues that Judge Smith acted in the
No. 99-50542 

-2-

complete absence of jurisdiction in granting the Government’s

motion to dispose of his property and awarding it to the

Limestone County, Texas, Sheriff’s Department. Because Phinizy

moved to dispose of Posey’s property pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3665

and the district court acted pursuant to § 3665, Phinizy and

Judge Smith are entitled to immunity for their actions taken in

their official capacity. See Boyd v. Biggers, 31 F.3ed 279, 285

(5th Cir. 1994)(prosecutorial immunity); Graves v. Hampton, 1

F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993)(judicial immunity). Judge Smith

did not act in the complete absence of authority. Mireles v.

Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991). Further, Judge Smith is not

deprived of immunity even if the action is ultimately found to be

in error. Id. at 12-13. Posey has not shown that the district

court abused its discretion in dismissing his Bivens action for

monetary damages against Judge Smith and Phinizy as frivolous

pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

Posey’s appeal is without arguable merit and it thus

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Accordingly, Posey’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Posey is advised that the district court’s dismissal of his

Bivens action as frivolous counts as a “strike” pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g) after this court dismisses this appeal and that

the dismissal of this appeal also counts as a “strike” pursuant

to § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th

Cir. 1996). Posey is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates a third

“strike,” he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action
No. 99-50542 

-3-

or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any

facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See § 1915(g). The motion to supplement is GRANTED.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         119,598
<SECURITIES>                                 1,550,365
<RECEIVABLES>                                  856,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,844
<INVENTORY>                                     52,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,931,780
<PP&E>                                      18,452,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                 850,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,463,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,109,108
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,319,897
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,202,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,463,830
<SALES>                                      2,233,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,233,441
<CGS>                                        1,187,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,607,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (349,046)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (349,046)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (349,046)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2162 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2162

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit fleeing law 
    enforcement officers enforcing immigration laws, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2021

 Mr. Rosendale (for himself, Mr. Steube, Ms. Herrell, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. 
 Brooks, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Budd, Mr. Hice of Georgia, 
  and Mr. Good of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit fleeing law 
    enforcement officers enforcing immigration laws, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminalize Fleeing from Immigration 
Enforcement Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. FLEEING ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS.

    (a) In General.--Section 758 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 758. Fleeing enforcement of immigration laws
    ``Whoever--
            ``(1) flees or evades a Federal, State, or local law 
        enforcement officer, which officer has identified himself as 
        such an officer, enforcing section 274(a)(1)(A)(i) or (ii), 
        section 274(a)(2), section 275, section 276, or section 277 of 
        the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324, 1325, 1326, 
        1327); or
            ``(2) flees or evades a checkpoint operated by the 
        Immigration and Naturalization Service, or any other Federal 
        law enforcement agency, and flees Federal, State, or local law 
        enforcement agents,
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than five years, 
or both, or, in the case of flight or evasion in motor vehicle in 
excess of the legal speed limit, shall be fined under this title, 
imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 35 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the item related 
to section 758 and inserting the following:

``758. Fleeing enforcement of immigration laws.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>
CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED
(in thousands of dollars or shares except per share amounts)
Sixteen Weeks Ended Nov. 11, 2000 and Nov. 13, 1999
<CAPTION>
                                           Sixteen Weeks Ended
                                         ----------------------
                                          Nov. 11,     Nov. 13,
                                            2000         1999
                                         ---------    ---------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>
Diluted:
  Net earnings (loss) applicable to
    common shares:
      From continuing operations         $  2,955     $ (2,663)
      From discontinued operations         (3,297)        (680)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net loss                         $   (342)    $ (3,343)
                                         =========    =========
Shares:
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding              17,828       17,784
  Shares issuable under employee
    stock plans - weighted average             38           --*
  Dilutive effect of exercise of
    certain stock options                     183           --*
  Less: Treasury stock-weighted average   (10,126)      (7,946)
                                         ---------    ---------
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding    7,923        9,838
                                         =========    =========
Net earnings (loss) per common and
    common equivalent shares:
      From continuing operations         $   0.37     $  (0.27)
      From discontinued operations          (0.41)       (0.07)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net loss                         $  (0.04)    $  (0.34)
                                         =========    =========
<FN>
* The dilutive effect of stock options in the amount of 368,912
  shares and 40,967 shares issuable under employee stock plans
  were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.
</FN>
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6267

ELVIS WAYNE JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE VIRGINIA ACA; QUINN MICHAEL, The Virginia Attorney; THE 

AMERICAN CORRECTION ASSOCIATION; UNITED STATES COURT OF 

APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00158-RAJ-RJK)

Submitted: April 22, 2021 Decided: April 26, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elvis Wayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Elvis Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice 

his civil action for failure to comply with the district court’s prior order to submit an 

amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and statutory filing fee or in forma pauperis 

application within the allotted time. Before this appeal was filed, Jones submitted to the 

district court an amended § 1983 complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis. Because Jones now has complied with the district court’s prior order and the 

district court will obtain jurisdiction to review the filings upon disposition of this appeal, 

we conclude there is no relief Jones could obtain by way of this appeal, and we dismiss the 

appeal as moot. See CVLR Performance Horses, Inc. v. Wynne, 792 F.3d 469, 474 (4th 

Cir. 2015) (“Litigation may become moot during the pendency of an appeal when an 

intervening event makes it impossible for the court to grant effective relief to the prevailing 

party.”). We further deny Jones’ motions for federal transit extension, summary judgment, 

default judgment, and injunctive relief pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2024*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter 467.60

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE^

20-Year Bond (r) 1/2 13.00 0.00

2-Year Note 1/2 57.00 3.00

5-Year Note 1/2 58.00 3.00

7-Year Note 1/2 40.00 1.00 104.80 63.20

3-Year Note 1/16 52.00 2.00

10-Year Note (r) 1/16 38.00 3.00

30-Year Bond (r) 1/16 22.00 2.00 91.82 20.18

20-Year Bond (r) 1/31 13.00 0.00

10-Year TIPS 1/31 18.00 1.00

2-Year Note 1/31 60.00 3.00

2-Year FRN 1/31 28.00 2.00

5-Year Note 1/31 61.00 3.00

7-Year Note 1/31 41.00 1.00 179.24 41.76

3-Year Note 2/15 54.00 2.00

10-Year Note 2/15 44.00 3.00

30-Year Bond 2/15 27.00 2.00 105.13 19.87

2-Year FRN (r) 2/23 26.00 2.00 0.00 26.00

20-Year Bond 2/29 16.00 0.00

30-Year TIPS 2/29 10.00 2.00

2-Year Note 2/29 63.00 3.00

5-Year Note 2/29 64.00 3.00

7-Year Note 2/29 42.00 1.00 98.33 96.67

3-Year Note 3/15 56.00 2.00

10-Year Note (r) 3/15 41.00 3.00

30-Year Bond (r) 3/15 24.00 2.00 56.28 64.72

10-Year TIPS (r) 3/28 16.00 1.00 0.00 16.00

984.00 635.60 348.40

Estimates are italicized. r = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 816

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 10/31/2023 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
print | close



# Recycling Keeps Railroad Ties Off The Landfill Track
Waste Age WORLD WASTES STAFF Fri, 1995-09-01 12:00 St. Louis - The railroads have been working hard to transport waste across the country. But what happens to the waste generated by the railroads? Currently, 13 million wooden crossties are removed fr om railroad service each year. More than half are reused in landscaping, fencing, construction, retainin g walls and as fuel for utilities and other plants; the rest are landfilled. To conserve landfill space while turning a profit, se veral companies have developed innovative uses for the crossties. For example, Wood Waste Energy Inc. (WWE), St. Louis, in cooperation with Norfolk Southern Railroad, Richmond, Va., and Chicago and Northw estern Railroad, grinds the ties to sell as fuel to an electric utility near St. Louis. One advantage to burning cross-ties is their low mois ture content. In addition, because the crossties are creosote-treated, the chips reportedly allow the boiler fire to burn at a higher temperature than for untreated wood chips. For example, the treated wood fire reportedly generates power of approximately 7,000 Btu, compared to 4,000 to 6,000 Btu for untreated wood. Further, the treated wood chips reportedly leave behind less resi due compared to untreated chips. In Provo, Utah, another company is disassemblin g and reusing a 100-year old, 12-mile-long wooden railroad trestle submerged in the Great Salt Lake. "The wood is chock full of salt, which has essentially preserved [it]," said John Cannon, president of Trestlewood. The wood en trestles, composed of Douglas fir and redwood timbers, have been sold for use as pilings, telephone poles, retaining walls, house logs, siding, architectural elements and crib blocks for underground coal mines.

Source URL: http://waste360.com/mag/wast e_recycling_keeps_railroad 

### Pa g e 1 of 1 Rec y clin g Keeps Railroad Ties Off The Landfill Trac k

8/8/2013 htt p ://waste360.com/ p rint/ma g /waste

_ rec y clin g_ kee p s

_ railroa d
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31605]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Section 211.273, Substitutions for 
Military or Federal Specifications and Standards, and related clause in 
DFARS 252.211-7005; OMB Number 0704-0398.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 257.
    Responses Per Respondent: 3.
    Annual Responses: 771.
    Average Burden Per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 771.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection permits offerors to 
propose Single Process Initiative (SPI) processes in lieu of military 
or Federal specifications and standards cited in DoD solicitations for 
previously developed items. The information will be used by the 
Government to identify and verify Government acceptance of an SPI 
process as a valid replacement for a military or Federal specification 
or standard cited in a solicitation. Respondents are offerors 
responding to DoD solicitations for previously developed items that 
cite military or Federal specifications or standards when the offeror 
has a management or manufacturing process that has been previously 
accepted by DoD, under SPI, as a valid replacement for a military or 
Federal specification or standard.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Peter N. Weiss.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Weiss at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: November 26, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-31605 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32588]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Service Regulations Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter Service) will 
conduct an open meeting on January 29, 1998, to identify and discuss 
preliminary issues concerning the 1998-99 migratory bird hunting 
regulations.

DATES: January 29, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The Service Regulations Committee will meet at the U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, Arlington Square Building, Room 200 A/B, 
Arlington, Virginia.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul R. Schmidt, Chief, Office of 
Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department 
of the Interior, ms 634--ARLSQ, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20240, (703) 358-1714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Representatives from the Service, the 
Service's Migratory Bird Regulations Committee, and Flyway Council 
Consultants will meet on January 29, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. to identify 
preliminary issues concerning the 1998-99 migratory bird hunting 
regulations for discussion and review by the Flyway Councils at their 
March meetings.
    In accordance with Departmental policy regarding meetings of the 
Service Regulations Committee attended by any person outside the 
Department, these meetings are open to public observation. Members of 
the public may submit written comments on the matters discussed to the 
Director.

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
Jamie Rappaport Clark,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 97-32588 Filed 12-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-F