[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64587-64588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders by the Office of 
Hearings and Appeals; Week of September 1 Through September 5, 1997

    During the week of September 1 through September 5, 1997, the 
decisions and orders summarized below were issued with respect to 
appeals, applications, petitions, or other requests filed with the 
Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. The 
following summary also contains a list of submissions that were 
dismissed by the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
    Copies of the full text of these decisions and orders are available 
in the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, 
Room 1E-234, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, 
Washington, D.C. 20585-0107, Monday through Friday, between the hours 
of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except federal holidays. They are also 
available in Energy Management: Federal Energy Guidelines, a 
commercially published loose leaf reporter system. Some decisions and 
orders are available on the Office of Hearings and Appeals World Wide 
Web site at http://www.oha.doe.gov.

    Dated: November 26, 1997.
George B. Breznay,
Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Decision List No. 49, Week of September 1 Through September 5, 1997

Appeal

Hanford Advisory Board, 9/2/97, VFA-0323

    The Hanford Advisory Board filed an Appeal of a Determination 
issued to it in response to a request under the Freedom of Information 
Act (FOIA). The Appellant had asked for portions of a proposal made by 
Fluor Daniel Hanford (FDH). In its Determination, the

[[Page 64588]]

Richland Operations Office (ROO) denied the request pursuant to 
Exemption 3 of the FOIA and the National Defense Authorization Act of 
1997 (NDAA), which generally prohibits the release of proposals. The 
DOE found that the NDAA applied to a proposal that was issued prior to 
the effective date of the statute. The DOE also found that the 
requested proposal did not meet the requirements of the NDAA's 
exception to non-disclosure for proposals set forth or incorporated by 
reference into the final contract. However, because it appeared that 
the DOE had released information from the proposal in news conferences 
and press releases, the agency had waived Exemption 3 protection as to 
that information. Accordingly, the Appeal was granted and the case was 
remanded to the ROO for further action.

Refund Application

Pillsbury Company, RC272-97810; Seneca Foods Corporation, 9/5/97, 
RK272-4055

    The DOE rescinded a refund to one company and denied a Supplemental 
Refund to a another company in the crude oil refund proceeding. 
Pillsbury Company (Pillsbury) had received a crude oil refund based on 
the purchases by its affiliate, the Green Giant Co. (Green Giant). 
Later, the DOE found that another affiliate of Pillsbury, Burger King 
Corporation (BK), had received a refund from the Surface Transporters 
Escrow in the Stripper Well refund proceedings. By filing the Stripper 
Well proceeding, BK waived Pillsbury's right to receive any refund in 
the crude oil refund proceeding. Accordingly, Pillsbury's crude oil 
refund was rescinded. The DOE rejected Pillsbury's argument that 
because Seneca Foods Corporation had assumed the liabilities of Green 
Giant when it purchased its assets, Seneca should be required to repay 
the refund.

Refund Applications

    The Office of Hearings and Appeals issued the following Decisions 
and Orders concerning refund applications, which are not summarized. 
Copies of the full texts of the Decisions and Orders are available in 
the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Name                          Case No.             Date 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rollings Farms et al...............  RK272-02995                  9/5/97
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dismissals

    The following submissions were dismissed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Name                               Case No.           
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buesing Corporation....................  RK272-03411                    
Towle Manufacturing Company............  RK272-4144                     
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 97-32052 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P