alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2007 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| *August 8, 2007* |   | By:                     | * * | *s/James F. Conway III* | * * |
|------------------|--------|-------------------------|----------|-------------------------|----------|
| Date             |   | James F. Conway III     |
|             |   | Chairman, President and |
|             |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

----
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09815**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09815\09815_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09815\09815_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09815\09815_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09815\09815_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09815\09815_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09815\09815_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09815\Certification Statement_09815.pdf Plant certification statement x 09815\Follow up\09815 Email.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 09815\Follow up\follow up questions.doc Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_1_AES-Hawaii ICR Transmittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_2_AES Layout_R5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_3_AESHI Operator Handbook.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_4_WB-1 Water Balance - AES Hawaii_Final.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_5_CSP Permit 09.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_6_Ash Handling System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_7_UIC Permit 10-1-07.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_8_WWT System Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_9_EPA_D-1 Block Diagram WWT-1_Revised102510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09815\Supplemental Documents\09815_Part D (2).xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09815\09815_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09815\09815_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
56

m

3 )Tacoma South LSt. PMF ResultsSoil Attribution (Every 6th day)Soil Attribution (30 day ave )45

F 'Soil' ( μ g/ mSoilAttribution(30dayave.)3

outh L PM F12

Tacoma S1/1/2007 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/20110D tae•ThesearemodelresultsusingthePositiveMatrixFactorization(PMF)sourceapportionmentmodelavailableathttp://www.epa.gov/heasd/products/pmf/pmf.html•MonitoringdatausedasinputstothePMFmodelisavailableathttp://views.cira.colostate.edu/web/•TacomaSouthLSt.PMFresultsfor‘Soil’=allfugitivedustthatwouldmostlybemadeupofcrustalcomponents(e.g.,Al,Si,Ca,Ti).Thiswouldpotentiallyincludewindblownsoil,roaddust,constructiondust,coaltrainfugitivedust,andotherindustrialfugitivedust.•Noincreasingtrendfrom2008to~mid2011.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) of OFS Capital
Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Glenn R. Pittson, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Glenn R. PittsonName:

Glenn R. PittsonDate:

March 26, 2013
EXHIBIT 11.1 CPI CORP.
COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED
(Unaudited) Twelve Weeks Ended May 1, 2004 and April 26, 2003 Twelve Weeks EndedMay, 1
  2004
  
  April 26,
  2003Diluted:Net loss applicable to common shares:Net loss
  
  $
  (8,798,212
  )
  $
  (2,729,790
  )Shares:Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding
  
  
  18,366,028
  
  
  18,339,082Shares issuable under employee stock plans
  - weighted average
  
  
  
  *
  
  
  **Diluted effect of exercise of certain stock
  options
  
  
  
  *
  
  
  **Less: 
  Treasury stock - weighted average
  
  
  (10,265,456
  )
  
  (10,238,303
  )Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding
  
  
  8,100,572
  
  
  8,100,779Net loss per
  common and common equivalent shares:Net loss
  
  $
  (1.09
  )
  $
  (0.34
  )  *
  The dilutive
  effect of stock options in the amount of 61,227 shares and 17,449 shares
  issuable under employee stock plans were not considered as the effect is
  antidilutive.**
  The dilutive
  effect of stock options in the amount of 236 shares and 18,415 shares
  issuable under employee stock plans were not considered as the effect is
  antidilutive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                             141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,893<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,641
<PP&E>                                          26,326<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,907
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              643
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,897
<SALES>                                         89,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,011
<CGS>                                           66,184<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (190)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,938
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,567
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.08
<FN>
<F1>NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
<F2>NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND DEPLETION
<F3>EXCLUSIVE OF DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2053 

To amend the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 to extend the provision of 

assistance for critical services with respect to certain disasters, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Ms. PLASKETT (for herself and Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 to extend 

the provision of assistance for critical services with respect to certain disasters, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Resiliency Enhance5 ment Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPAIR, RESTORATION, AND REPLACEMENT OF 

7 DAMAGED FACILITIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 20601 of the Bipartisan 

9 Budget Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–123) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2053 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘, and’’ and inserting a comma; 

2 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and including, for purposes 

3 of this section, solid waste management, stormwater 

4 management, public housing, transportation infra5 structure, and medical care,’’ before ‘‘for the dura6 tion’’; and 

7 (3) by inserting ‘‘, and any subsequent major 

8 disaster (as such term is defined in section 102 of 

9 the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emer10 gency Assistance Act) declared under section 401 of 

11 the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emer12 gency Assistance Act in Puerto Rico or the Virgin 

13 Islands on or before September 30, 2022’’ before 

14 ‘‘to—’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in section 

17 20601 of Public Law 115–123. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-990-1020-01]


Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Resource Advisory Council meeting location and time.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C., the 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) council 
meeting of the Upper Snake River Districts Resource Advisory Council 
will be held as indicated below. The agenda includes a discussion on 
implementation of the healthy rangeland standard and guidelines, 
briefing on the Draft Dairy Syncline EIS and to prepare comments for 
the Upper Columbia Basin--EIS. All meetings are open to the public. The 
public may present written comments to the council. Each formal council 
meeting will have a time allocated for hearing public comments. The 
public comment period for the council meeting is listed below. 
Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment, and time 
available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need further information about the 
meetings, or need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Debra 
Kovar at the Shoshone Resource Area Office, P. O. Box 2-B, Shoshone, 
ID, 83352, (208) 886-7201.

DATE AND TIME: Date is January 22, 1998, starts at 8:30 a.m. at the 
Pocatello Resource Area Office at 1111 N 8th Avenue, Pocatello, Idaho. 
Public comments will be received from 1:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the council is to advise the 
Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning 
and management issues associated with the management of the public 
lands.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Debra Kovar, Shoshone Resource Area 
Office, P. O. Box 2-B, Shoshone, ID 83352, (208) 886-7201.

    Dated: December 5, 1997.
Tom Dyer,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-32534 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
EXHIBIT
32.3



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to theAnnual Report of SQN Alternative Investment
Fund III L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, Jeremiah Silkowski, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and                   
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the SEC or its staff upon request.



|Date:
    April 15, 2019          | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|                                  | 
|/s/
    Jeremiah Silkowski        | 
|Jeremiah
    Silkowski            | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer       | 
|(Principal
    Financial Officer) |
#### HEBREW HOME FOR the AGED OF MIAMI BEACH and R. P. Hewitt & Associates of Florida, Inc., Petitioners, v. Mary Lee BROWN and the Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 42871.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 21, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              89
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,362
<PP&E>                                           3,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,207
<BONDS>                                          1,789
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                         523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,866
<SALES>                                          2,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,208
<CGS>                                            1,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    45
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    262
<INCOME-TAX>                                        88
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       162
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3244]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 11:00 a.m. on 
Tuesday, February 4, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's supervisory activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Joseph H. Neely 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of 
the Currency), Director Nicolas P. Retsinas (Director, Office of Thrift 
Supervision), and Chairman Ricki Helfer, that Corporation business 
required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' 
notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: February 5, 1997.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3244 Filed 2-5-97; 2:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
(4910-13-Pj

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON UMU •• rNC"ES o;rrM;S'-MOOt Federal Aviation Administution 14CFR Part 39 m

# ,/(¥2-"-

RIN 212Q-AA64 (Docket No. FAA-2009-0659; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-060-AD; Amendmen 

## lid'll 

## U,C-(=O·Cl 39-*****; AD  -** -**] 

# '.',n8lo~ Airworthiness Directives; Empresa BrasiJeiradeAeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mod "TlNl.$"'."1 

### ~ -:;,1- 

### 4~t:- EMB-135BJ, -135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR Airplanes; and EMB-145, -!45E -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -145EP Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. 

## Iv MU, ) It

# J:U. -;9' S""RQI /';M - 

# 1--
I'm~L'lSl(o 

# C.C'-irr<- ,~n 1/0'7/(0

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and con"ectan unsafe above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infomlation (MeAl) J'!"/\
- J

## l'-i SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airw-orthiness directive (AD) for the products list



# - K..'~""LPv/'lf'C 

# Ti~-IO
condition 011

an aviation product. The MeAl describes the ul1safecondition as: 

### I~Fn'L.Z '/-1' 

## j "M" Ithas been found occurrences of main landing gear (MLG) trailing ann pins broken due to a fatigue mechanism induced by an excessive torque applied during the assemblage ofauxiliary door support attachment and consequent deformation ofthe MLG trailing arm axle. Abroken pin can lead 10loss ofthe MLG trailing arm axle, disconnecting the trailing aml from the main strut, which affects the airplane controllability on ground . 

# • • * 

# • • • • . { I -,., "" ~Olrl"l.WSy>,,1ll1. 

### )"M- l(

MT'A'.~"'. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these
#### Leslie Grey DAVIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. John LAMBERT, et al., Respondent—Appellee.

No. 01-35291.

D.C. No. CV-00-05069-FVS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Leslie Grey Davis, a Washington State prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failing to exhaust his available state court remedies.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §. 2253. We review de novo the denial of a section 2254 petition, *Forrest v. Vasquez,*75 F.3d 562, 563 (9th Cir.1996), and we affirm.

Davis contends that the Washington Supreme Court’s denial without comment of his petition for review was a ruling on the merits, demonstrating he has exhausted his available state remedies. Having reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that circumstances indicate Davis’ petition was denied on procedural grounds for failing to fairly present the issues for review and answer to the Washington Supreme Court, in accordance with Washington’s Rules of Appellate Procedure. *See Kibler v. Walters,*220 F.3d 1151, 1153 (9th Cir.2000) (as amended), *cert, denied,*531 U.S. 1086, 121 S.Ct. 795, 148 L.Ed.2d 689 (2001). As a result, Davis has not provided the Washington Supreme Court an opportunity to address his claims, and accordingly has failed to ex*798haust his state remedies. *See Forrest,*75 F.3d at 564.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Because we denied Davis' April 2, 2001 motion to expand his certificate of appealability ("COA”), we decline to address Davis' claims that fall outside the scope of the original COA issued by the district court on March 13, 2001. *See Hiivala v. Wood,*195 F.3d 1098, 1103 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).