alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        97,091,956
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       17,097,218
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         17,651,360
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                    3,822,95
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             131,299,503
<CASH>                                       1,460,600
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           2,223,836
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      31,746,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             172,297,744
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            109,163,608
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,754,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,814,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               172,297,744
<PREMIUMS>                                   9,504,340
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,337,201
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             176,455
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,365,252
<BENEFITS>                                   6,300,420
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,246,116
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         3,413,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,422,721
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,294,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,128,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,128,348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Interest of D. R. B., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-50.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Joseph L. GREENWELL, Appellant, v. Ira B. GORDON, Appellee.

No. 69-1058.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 11, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
FLEC Research & Evaluation 

Committee

Summary
Next Steps

Diploma

&

Financial Literacy

and

Education

Commission

Research Priorities applied to the

2013-2014 Strategic Focus

“Starting Early

for Financial Success”

May 2013
“Starting Early for Financial Success: 

Capability into Action”

Journal articles will:

1. Rigorously explore the connection between financial education 

and capability interventions and measurable changes in financial 

behavior and outcomes. 

2. Advance the knowledge of policy makers that comprise the FLEC, 

and the wider financial education field’s, understanding of what 

type of financial capability interventions can both measurably 

improve an individual’s theoretical ability to make informed 

financial decisions (increasing their knowledge and skills) and 

actually lead to action, or changes in financial behavior that lead 

to improved financial outcomes. 

3. Generate new learnings and insights to fuel innovations in policy 

and practice that will increase financial capability of American 

households. 
The Journal of Consumer Affairs

• The Journal of Consumer Affairs is published by the American 

Council on Consumer Interests. 

– The Journal features analysis of individual, business, and/or 

government decisions and actions that can impact the 

interests of consumers in the marketplace. 

– Research topics that can be addressed from the consumer's 

point of view include communications, consumer education, 

economics, finance, law, nutrition, public policy, psychology 

and marketing. 

– The journal is edited by Sharon Tennyson of Cornell University.

– Journal Website: 

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1745-

6606
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In the Matter of Jett Pro Line Maintenance ) Docket No. TBA \ 

) 

) 

) 

FAA Case No. 2011WP910076 

Judge Godwin 

________________________ ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

The undersigned hereby enters his appearance in this matter as counsel for Respondent 

Jett Pro Line Maintenance. Further communications to Respondent should directed to the 

undersigned at the address and contact numbers given below. 

Dated: March 5, 2014 

~~) .. ,\ tln 

'V L:/C~<Z--~9------- John Craig Weller 

Aerlex Law Group 

2800 281

h Street 

Suite 200 

Santa Monica, CA 90405 

TEL: (530) 205-9884 

FAX: (530) 205-9371 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In the Matter of Jett Pro Line Maintenance ) 

) 

) 

) ________________________) 

Docket No. TBA 

FAA Case No. 2011WP910076 

Judge Godwin 

CERTFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I served a copy of the attached Notice of Appearance by U.S. First Class 

Mail on the persons listed below. In addition, in accordance with Paragraph 6 of the Procedural 

Order, I also served a copy by facsimile on the presiding Judge and FAA counsel. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20S91 

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

Sam Nugud, President 

Jett Pro Line Maintenance 

8517 Earhart Road, Suite 210 

Oakland, CA 946212 

Sam Nugud, President 

Jett Pro Line Maintenance 

P.O. Box 3190 

Ontario, CA 91761 

Autumn Killingham, Esq. 

Enforcement Division, AGC-600 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

FAX: 202-267-S769 

ONE COPY 
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearing, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey, SE (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20S90 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Dated: March 5, 2014 

//\ < ·~ 'fl .. ~--- ~ aJJ.x.. ~1 

John Craig Weller 

Aerlex Law Group 

2800 281

h Street 

Suite 200 

Santa Monica, CA 90405 

TEL: 530-205-9884 

FAX: 530-205-9371
#### Earline WILSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7266.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 31, 2002.

Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to dismiss Earline Wilson’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Wilson opposes.

On September 29, 2000, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals determined that Wilson had not met the requirements for recognition as the veteran’s surviving spouse for purposes of an award of benefits. Wilson appealed the Board’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. The Secretary moved for summary affirmance. Upon review of the record in which Wilson acknowledged that she was divorced from the veteran, and the evidence showed that the veteran was married to someone else at the time of his death, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims determined that the Board’s factual findings “were not clearly erroneous” and *478affirmed the Board’s decision. Wilson appealed.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeals of Veterans Claims. *See Forshey v. Principi,*284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc). Wilson’s appeal does not satisfy any of the grounds for invoking this court’s jurisdiction. The decision from which Wilson appeals does not address or otherwise depend on any issue of validity or interpretation of any statute or regulation, nor did Wilson raise any argument concerning the validity or interpretation of any such provision. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims decision was limited “to review [of] the Board’s application of the law to the facts in this case.” This court “may not review: (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

In her informal brief, Wilson checked “no” when asked if the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims decision involved the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation, or decided any constitutional issues. Instead she states only that: “The Federal Government of the Social Security office are recognizing me as [the veteran’s] widow and I receive benefits” and thus this court should “grant and release all of [the veteran’s] benefit that is due to me as his widow.” Wilson’s appeal only challenges the application of law to the facts and is therefore not within this court’s jurisdiction.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary’s motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) is granted.

(2) The Secretary’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
#### Donald Allen BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-480.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Warren H. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Financial Literacy and Education Commission Public Meeting 

May 29, 2014

9:00 am -11:30 am

U.S. Department of the Treasury – Cash Room

Agenda

Welcome and Opening Remarks

Melissa Koide, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Consumer Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Mary J. Miller, Under Secretary for Domestic Finance, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Richard Cordray, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Retirement Savings and the Young 

Moderator: Judy Mares, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S.

Department of Labor

J. Mark Iwry, Senior Advisor to the Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) 

for Retirement and Health Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Lisa Mensah, Founder and Executive Director, Initiative on Financial Security, the Aspen Institute

Yvonne Cowser Yancy, Commissioner of Human Resources, City of Atlanta 

Research on Starting Early for Financial Success 

Moderator: Max Schmeiser, Senior Economist, Federal Reserve Board 

Louisa Quittman, Director, Financial Education, U.S. Department of the Treasury 

Camille Busette, Assistant Director, Office of Financial Education, Consumer Financial Protection 

Bureau 

Report on the Activities and Plans of the Commission

Melissa Koide, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Consumer Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Commission Announcements

Closing Remarks

Amias Gerety, Acting Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Adjourn
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

|               |  | Bank of America, N.A.,
Trustee for Hugoton Royalty Trust
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|March 11, 2004 |  | By                                                      

QuickLinks
#### Robert H. SPAIN, Appellant, v. Doyle ROGERS, John Douglass and Clinton Courson, Appellees.

No. 69-764.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1970.

Robert M. Sturrup, of Sturrup & Della-Donna, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

C. Robert Burns, of Burns, Middleton, Farrell & Faust, Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Having examined the record and considered the advice and argument of counsel, we are of the opinion that reversible error has not been demonstrated and that the judgment here appealed should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
#### Earl Fred MOSES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

July 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**I, Kenneth E. Wolf, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         */s/ Kenneth E. Wolf*   Name:  *Kenneth E. Wolf*   Title:  *Chief Financial Officer*   Date:  *August 15, 2006*   A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and willbe retained by Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

SET FOR SUBMISSION ON ORAL ARGUMENT WEDNESDAY , SEPTEMBER 2, 2015

AT 9:00 A.M.

(Before Chief Justice Brian Quinn, Justice Mackey K. Hancock, Justice Patrick A. Pirtle)

07

- 14

- 00318

- CR Danny Oltivero v. The State of Texas Deaf Smith County

Frank Jackson , Edgar A. Mason

– Appellant O/A Requested

Chris Strowd , Assistant O/A Requested

District Attorney

– State

07

- 1 4

- 00333

- CR The State of Texas v. Sammy Carl Williams Lynn County

Michael Munk, District Attorney O/A Requested

Jason Bujnosek, Assistant District Attorney

– State

THE LAW OFFICE OF ALLISON CLAYTON O/A Requested

( Allison Clayton )

MARK SNODGRASS LAW OFFICE

( Mark S. Snodgrass )

– Appellee

07

- 14

- 00345

- C R Marc Allen Mason v. The State of Texas Randall County

Eric Coats

– Appellant O/A Requested

Kristy Wright, Assistant District O/A Requested

Attorney

– State
EXHIBIT 13.2




CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Ossen Innovation Co. Ltd. (the "Registrant") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date:  June 23, 2011




/s/ Yilun JinYilun Jin(Principal Financial Officer)
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of
Bridgeport Ventures Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Annual Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby
certifies that to the best of such officers knowledge:

|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: July 18, 2012

By: /s/ Carmelo
Marrelli        Carmelo
Marrelli        Chief Financial
Officer        (principal financial
officer)

---
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. David CARTER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60646.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: David Carter applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and other remedial writs. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ refused. No merit in application.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 9, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40359

Summary Calendar

ALFREDO GARCIA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CV-664

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfredo Garcia, Texas prisoner # 668073, appeals the dismissal

of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the

revocation of his release on mandatory supervision as time-barred.

The district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA)

with respect to the question whether Garcia’s motion to reopen the

revocation proceedings constituted “other collateral review” for

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). We need not decide this

question in this case. Even if it is assumed that Garcia’s motion
2

constituted “other collateral review,” the limitation period

nevertheless expired prior to the filing of the federal habeas

petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(D). Although Garcia contends

that he is entitled to equitable tolling, COA was not granted as to

that question. 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-200-028]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

December 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 26, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be 
effective December 1, 1997:

Second Revised Sheet No. 7M

    NGT states that the purpose of this filing is to report a 
modification to an existing negotiated rate term.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestant parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31982 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Carl D. BUCHANAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF WINTER PARK, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 2556.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 23, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Willie C. HARRIES, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50766.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 11, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 1978.

Banks & Nichols, Fred L. Banks, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Catherine Walker Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.