alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT      11.1

**CPI      Corp.**

**Computation      of Per Common Share Earnings - Diluted**

|                                                                                                                             |   | 12                Weeks Ended |        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|-------------|
| * thousands,                except share and per share data*                                                                |   | April                28, 2007 |        |   | April                29, 2006 |   |
|                                                                                                                             |   |                          |        |   |   |   |
| Diluted:                                                                                                                         |   |                          |        |   |   |   |
|     Net                earnings applicable to common shares                                                  |   | $                             | 2,555       |   |   | $ | 1,844 |   |
|                                                                                                                             |   |                          |        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Shares:                                                                                                                          |   |                          |        |   |   |   |   |   |
|     Weighted                average number of common shares outstanding                                      |   |                          | 16,981,744  |   |   |   | 16,981,047 |   |
|     Dilutive                effect                of exercise of certain stock options                       |   |                          | 24,724      |   |   |   | 13,586 |   |
|     Less:                Treasury stock - weighted average                                                   |   |                          | (10,618,299 | ) |   |   | (10,616,198 | ) |
|                                                                                                                             |   |                          |        |   |   |   |   |   |
|     Weighted                average number of common and common equivalent shares                outstanding |   |                          | 6,388,169   |   |   |   | 6,378,435 |   |
|                                                                                                                             |   |                          |        |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net                earnings per common and common equivalent shares                                                              |   | $                             | 0.40        |   |   | $ | 0.29 |   |
|                                                                                                                             |   |                          |        |   |   |   |   |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2104 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2104

    To prohibit the Administrator of General Services from setting 
Continental United States (CONUS) per diem-reimbursements rates below a 
                 certain level, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2021

 Mr. Posey (for himself and Mr. Crist) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the Administrator of General Services from setting 
Continental United States (CONUS) per diem-reimbursements rates below a 
                 certain level, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restored, Equitable, Coronavirus 
Adjusted Lodging Act of 2021'' or the ``RECAL Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES (CONUS) PER DIEM-REIMBURSEMENT RATES.

    Notwithstanding in any other provision of law, in setting the per 
diem rates for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 pursuant to sections 5702 and 
5707 of title 5, United States Code, the Administrator of General 
Services may not set a lodging allowance rate for any location within 
the Continental United States at a level that is less than the rate set 
by GSA Per Diem Bulletin FTR 20-01, dated August 8, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS, INC. on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 /s/ CHARLES BARTLETT

Charles Bartlett CEO

Dated: April 11, 2011



/s/ CHARLES BARTLETT

Charles Bartlett

CFO

Dated: April 11, 2011
  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1202EA

_____________ Arkansas ACORN Fair Housing, Inc., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Southwest Nursing Homes, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: September 24, 1998

Filed: September 30, 1998

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas Acorn Fai r Housing, Inc. (AAFH) appeals the district court's grant of Southwest Nursing Homes, Inc .'s (SNH) motion for judgment as a matter of law. The district court ruled there was insufficient evidence to establish AAFH's Fair Housing Act c laim that its investigator/tester was the object of a misrepresentation abou t housing opportunities for minority residents at SNH's residential care facility mad e unlawful under 42 U.S.C. § 3604(c) (1994). We review the distr ict court's ruling under awell-established standard. Based on the record before us, we conclude the district court's ruling on the mer

its was correct and that an extended opinion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IFC Investment in Power Grid Corporation of India

U.S. Position

Thursday, May 3, 2012

The United States appreciates IFC staff’s frank discussion of risks found in the due diligence process, 

including the company’s relationship with a company temporarily debarred by the Bank, and the 

decision to categorize this project as a Category A. The United States recognizes the strong alignment of 

this proposed investment with portions of the Bank’s Country Assistance Strategy for India such as 

addressing the country’s power infrastructure needs. The United States acknowledges that the 

proposed investment is consistent with IFC’s strategy for South Asia.

Nonetheless, the United States has questions about the proposed investment and would welcome staff 

comment on several issues:

First, at what point should the Bank Group conclude its relationship with Power Grid? We appreciate 

that the IFC’s engagement represents a new phase in Power Grid’s relationship with the Bank Group. 

After a nineteen-year engagement with the World Bank, however, the United States would generally 

expect at least a discussion about considerations for eventual disengagement. 

Second, should the IFC be supporting the entry of a state-owned enterprise into other emerging markets? 

The investment document assumes that this is an appropriate medium-term objective for the IFC’s 

proposed programmatic engagement. The United States is less convinced that the IFC should be playing 

an active role in assisting state-owned enterprises with no plans for privatization to gain market access 

in third countries.

Third, this operation underscores broad questions about whether there is a need for a more consistent 

approach across Bank Group institutions on issues such as procurement policy and environmental and 

social safeguards in cases where the IFC and IBRD/IDA both make investments in the same institution 

(such as under the Bank Group’s subnational program). While in the case of Power Grid, the Bank’s 

prior engagement with the company and strengthening of its procurement procedures as well as 

environmental and social policies have facilitated IFC’s investment and mitigated risks, in other cases the 

United States wonders if differences and gaps between the two institutions’ policies and procedures 

could lead to confusion or manipulation.

Finally, given the date of the publication of the Environment and Social Review Summary (less than 120 

days prior to the Board discussion), the United States wishes to be recorded as abstaining on this 

proposed investment for legislatively mandated reasons.
**EXHIBIT10.144**

**SIXTHAMENDMENT****TO THE****GLOBAL STOCK PLAN****OF****COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

**WHEREAS**, the CompensationCommittee of the Board of Directors of Countrywide Financial Corporation (the “**Company**”) has determined that it is in thebest interest of the Company to amend the Countrywide Financial CorporationGlobal Stock Plan (the “**Global Stock Plan**”)to amend the definition of “Fair Market Value” to conform to certain revisedrules of the Securities and Exchange Commission;

**NOW THEREFORE**, the Global StockPlan is amended effective as of January 1, 2007, in the following particulars:

# 1.             Section 2.11 is hereby deleted in its entirety and newSection 2.11 is inserted in its place as follows (with the revised languagereflected below in italics):

### “2.11       “**Fair Market Value**”on any date means the***officially-quoted closing selling price of the shares of Common Stock*on such date on the principal nationalsecurities exchange or other stock market on which such shares are listed oradmitted to trading *(including the New YorkStock Exchange, Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. or such other market or exchange inwhich such prices are regularly quoted)*or, if there have been no *sales* withrespect to shares on such date, the Fair Market Value shall be the valueestablished by the Board in good faith and in accordance with Section *422* of the Code.”

**INWITNESS WHEREOF,** the Company has caused this Sixth Amendmentto be executed by its duly authorized officer this 30th day of November, 2006.
|        |   | Countrywide Financial Corporation |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |   |                              |   |   |
|   |   |                              |   |   |
|   |   | By:                               |   | /s/ Marshall M. Gates |
|   |   |                              |   | Marshall Gates |
|   |   |                              |   | Senior Managing Director, |
|   |   |                              |   | Chief Administrative Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6577
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH WILLIE KENNEDY, a/k/a Snake, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-116-JFM) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Willie Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motions for enlargement of time and for "unsealing of the record." We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kennedy , No. CR-92-116-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Lillian ROMERO and her husband Milton D. Romero, Appellants, v. LUBY LEASING, INC., a Florida corporation, Burger King Corp., a Florida corporation, and Lonnie Foster, Appellees.

No. 70-341.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 21, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/27/2011 02:52 PM

Subject: Re: A couple small suggested edits soon

Suggested edits in the attachment. Let me know what you think -

H
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.    /s/Charles W. ShiveryCharles W. ShiveryChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  May 9, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Management Committee


BMW Financial Services NA, LLC




We have examined BMW Financial Services NA, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for Asset-Backed Notes, BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2010- A (except for the servicing criteria described in the following paragraph), which the Company has determined as being applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset—backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2010 and for the period from April 21, 2010 to December 31, 2010. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria based on our examination.




The Company has determined that the servicing criteria in Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x)(A)-(C), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset—backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2010 and for the period from April 21, 2010 to December 31, 2010.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph of this report and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph.




In our opinion, BMW Financial Services NA, LLC complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of December 31, 2010 and for the period from April 21, 2010 to December 31, 2010.




/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP




Roseland, New Jersey


March 18, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65283-65284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-930-1430-01; COC-12610]


Public Land Order No. 7302; Withdrawal of Public Lands for 
Addition to the Arapaho National Wildlife Refuge; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order withdraws from surface entry and mining 1,720 acres 
of public lands and transfers administrative jurisdiction to the Fish 
and Wildlife Service for a 50-year period. This action will allow the 
Fish and Wildlife Service to administer the lands as a part of the 
Arapaho National Wildlife Refuge. The lands have been and remain open 
to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State 
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7076, 303-239-
3706.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the following described public 
lands are hereby withdrawn from settlement, sale, location, or entry 
under the general land laws, including the United States mining laws 
(30 U.S.C. Ch. 2 (1994)),

[[Page 65284]]

but not from leasing under the mineral leasing laws, and administrative 
jurisdiction transferred to the Fish and Wildlife Service as an 
addition to the Arapaho National Wildlife Refuge:

Sixth Principal Meridian

T. 7 N., R. 79 W.,
    sec. 19, SE\1/4\NE\1/4\.
T. 7 N., R. 80 W.,
    sec. 10, NE\1/4\NE\1/4\;
    sec. 11, N\1/2\NW\1/4\;
    sec. 13, SW\1/4\SW\1/4\ and W\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    sec. 14, NW\1/4\NW\1/4\;
    sec. 15, NE\1/4\NE\1/4\.
T. 8 N., R. 79 W.,
    sec. 8, S\1/2\;
    sec. 9, S\1/2\;
    sec. 17.
T. 8 N., R. 80 W.,
    sec. 12, S\1/2\NE\1/4\.

    The areas described aggregate 1,720 acres in Jackson County.

    2. This withdrawal and transfer of administrative jurisdiction 
places these lands under the management of the Fish and Wildlife 
Service pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 668dd (1994).
    3. This withdrawal will expire 50 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1994), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: November 26, 1997.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 97-32421 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000023426
<NAME> THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            1,706,089
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                            636,162
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 558,400
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             1,883,722
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,784,373
<COMMON>                                                75,849
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                              412,993
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                    208,816
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                         698,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                            116,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                 1,069,615
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                     110,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                          160,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                    0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                             42,459
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        90,023
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       2,498,418
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                        4,784,373
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                            2,179,704
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                    88,194
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           1,901,854
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           2,009,016
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                170,688
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                     (18,549)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                         171,107
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                74,370
<NET-INCOME>                                            96,737
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                              6,012
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                           90,725
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                35,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                    0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 176,499
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.00

</TABLE>