alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ignacio F. FRANCIA, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 02-3066.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 31, 2002.

Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The Office of Personnel Management moves to summarily affirm the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board that dismissed Ignacio F. Francia’s appeal as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Francia has not responded.

Francia sought OPM benefits. OPM denied the benefits and Francia appealed to the Board. The Board affirmed in 1998. Francia’s appeal of that Board decision to this court was dismissed. *Francia v. Office of Personnel Management,*no. 98-3381 (Fed.Cir. May 5,1999).

On August 24, 2000, Francia wrote to the Board, seeking to appeal the disallowance of his application for retirement benefits. The Board docketed Francia’s letter as an appeal and directed Francia to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed based on the doctrine of res judica-ta. The Board also noted that there had not been any new OPM decision regarding an application by Francia for benefits. Francia replied to the Board’s orders but did not address why his appeal was not barred by res judicata. On November 27, 2000, the administrative judge in an initial decision dismissed Francia’s appeal as barred by res judicata. Francia’s petition for review by the Board was denied on October 11, 2001, and Francia petitioned this court for review.

OPM argues that the Board’s decision should be summarily affirmed. We agree. Summary disposition of a case “is appropriate, *inter alia,*when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists.” *Joshua*
      *469
      *v. United States,*17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir.1994). In the present case, it is clear that summary disposition is warranted. Res judicata bars any attempt by Francia to obtain review of the denial of his application for OPM benefits.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) OPM’s motion for summary affir-mance is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<PAGE>   1



                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-72949) on Form S-8 of Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated
March 26, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Central Illinois
Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.


                                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
April 29, 1999
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 3 2005

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

STEVEN R. STONE,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-2144

(District of New Mexico)

(D.C. No. CR-04-469-RB)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before EBEL, MURPHY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this court has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Steven R. Stone was found guilty by a magistrate judge of camping longer

than permitted in a National Forest in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.58(a). The

district court affirmed Stone’s conviction and he now appeals pro se. On appeal

Stone argues that the federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over this

matter.

Federal courts have jurisdiction over all cases arising under the

Constitution and laws of the United States. U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. 

Federal district courts have original jurisdiction “of all offenses against the laws

of the United States.” 18 U.S.C. § 3231. Congress has authorized the Secretary

of Agriculture to issue rules and regulations related to the occupancy and use of

National Forests and any person charged with violating such regulations may be

tried by a magistrate judge. 16 U.S.C. § 551; 18 U.S.C. § 3401.

Stone’s jurisdictional challenge is without merit because he was charged

with violating 36 C.F.R. § 261.58(a), a regulation promulgated pursuant to 16

U.S.C. § 551, and his conviction is therefore affirmed .

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge
#### Robert P. HARRINGTON, Executor of the Estate of Rose I. Olson, deceased, Petitioner, v. Joseph B. SIRGANY, Jr., for the use and benefit of OCEAN MILE GALLERIES, INC., etc., Respondent.

No. 41120.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 7, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 248 So.2d 266.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### IMPERIAL CASUALTY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Joyce B. ALLISON, Appellee.

Nos. 69-581, 69-716.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 29, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63737-63738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of December 1, 8, 15, and December 22, 1997.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of December 1

    There are no meetings the week of December 1.

Week of December 8--Tentative

Thursday, December 11
2:00 p.m.--Briefing on Investigative Matters (Closed--Ex. 5 & 7)
3:00 p.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)
Friday, December 12
9:00 a.m.--Meeting with Northeast Nuclear on Millstone (Public Meeting) 
(Contact: Bill Travers, 301-415-1200)

Week of December 15--Tentative

Wednesday, December 17
2:00 p.m.--Briefing on Integration and Evaluation of Results from 
Recent Lessons-Learned Reviews (including 50.59 Process Improvements) 
(Public Meeting) (Contact: Eileen McKenna, 301-415-2189)
3:30 p.m.--Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)
Thursday, December 18
10:00 a.m.--Meeting with Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) 
(Public Meeting) (Contact: John Larkins, 301-415-7360)

Week of December 22--Tentative

    There are no meetings the week of December 22.
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short

[[Page 63738]]

notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at

<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule@htm">http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aad9c9c2cfcedfc6cfeac2dec7">[email protected]</span></a>

    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers: 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1463797c547a66773a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6c1dbdef6d8c4d598d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b4f405c6b455948054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45212e32052b37266b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 26, 1997.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
Secy, Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31729 Filed 11-28-97; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan of up to $725 million to SkyWest 

Airlines, Inc. (the Company). Treasury originally agreed to make a loan of up to $573 million to 

the Company, and on October 28, 2020, Treasury increased the maximum loan amount to $725 

million. The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of SkyWest, Inc., and one of the largest 

domestic airlines in the United States. The Company had approximately 15,000 U.S. employees 

in March 2020 and carried more than 35 million passengers in 2019. 

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(1) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is secured by certain engines, airframes, and rotable 

parts. The loan has an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.0% and matures on September 29, 

2025. The Company elected to draw $60 million at close and may draw the remaining loan funds 

in multiple draws through May 28, 2021. The loan proceeds will be used to provide liquidity to 

continue the Company’s operations. The transaction agreement includes covenants by the 

Company to comply with certain restrictions on employee compensation, stock repurchases, 

dividends, and reductions in employment levels, as required by the CARES Act. Treasury will 

receive warrants to purchase common stock equal to 10% of the total loan amount drawn.
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2021*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter 435.99

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-Year Note 1/15 58.00 2.00

10-Year Note (r) 1/15 37.00 2.00

30-Year Bond (r) 1/15 24.00 1.00 56.34 62.66

10-Year TIPS 1/29 15.00 1.00 0.00 15.00

20-Year Bond (r) 2/1 23.00 1.00

2-Year Note 2/1 60.00 2.00

5-Year Note 2/1 61.00 2.00

2-Year FRN 2/1 26.00 0.00

7-Year Note 2/1 59.00 2.00 129.24 99.76

3-Year Note 2/16 59.00 1.00

10-Year Note 2/16 41.00 1.00

30-Year Bond 2/16 28.00 1.00 63.12 64.88

30-Year TIPS 2/26 9.00 1.00

2-Year FRN (r) 2/26 24.00 0.00 0.00 33.00

20-Year Bond 3/1 27.00 1.00

2-Year Note 3/1 61.00 1.00

5-Year Note 3/1 62.00 1.00

7-Year Note 3/1 60.00 1.00 71.32 138.68

3-Year Note 3/15 60.00 1.00

10-Year Note (r) 3/15 38.00 1.00

30-Year Bond (r) 3/15 25.00 1.00 20.73 102.27

2-Year FRN (r) 3/26 24.00 0.00 0.00 24.00

20-Year Bond (r) 3/31 24.00 1.00

10-Year TIPS (r) 3/31 13.00 1.00

2-Year Note 3/31 62.00 1.00

5-Year Note 3/31 63.00 1.00

7-Year Note 3/31 61.00 1.00 72.24 150.76

1104.00 412.99 691.01

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 1,127

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 11/02/2020 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131576 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131576 COA: 266102 Charlevoix CC: 00-032819-NO FRANCES LADI, LA URA LEE WILSON, SHANNON WILSON, MA RK SOKOLOWSKI, LISA SOKOLOWSKI, CHARLES CRADDUCK, DIANE CRADDUCK, DEBRA A. YAGER, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of MARK R. YAGER, Deceased, MEAGAN YAGER, MARK A. YAGER, KATI YAGER, EMILY YAGER, MARCELLA YAGER TADEUSZ DOBROWOLSKI, JEANETTE DOBROWOLSKI, CHRISTOPHER DOBROWOLSKI, ADAM DOBROWOLSKI, KYLE DOBROWOLSKI, SECOND CHANCE BODY ARMOR, INC., RICHARD DAVIS, MICHAEL J. JAYE, CURTIS GLENN CRAWFORD, and LAWRENCE GRISE, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 13.1



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Prime Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2015 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date: May 2, 2016 |     |                                             
|----------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                  | By: | /s/ William Tsu-Cheng Yu                    
|                  |     | William Tsu-Cheng Yu                        
|                  |     | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                  |     | (Principal Executive Officer)               



|Date: May 2, 2016 |     |                                             
|----------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                  | By: | /s/ Amy Lau                                 
|                  |     | Amy Lau                                     
|                  |     | Interim Chief Financial Officer             
|                  |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 99.6



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of IMRIS Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. David Graves, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:   March 12, 2013 | /s/ H. David Graves    
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|                       | H. David Graves        
|                       | Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 5, 2012 

d0227 

Order 

 

March 5, 2012 

143869 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143869 

 COA: 305326 

St. Clair CC: 10-000207-FC 

HARRY WILLIAM HARPER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### PARKWAY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al., Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 44272.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 9, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
### APPENDIX A

- 2

2011 Point Source Ozone Season Inventory

Provided in Electronic Form Only

Bureau of Air Quality

Department of Environmental Protection[ This page intentionally left blank

. ]
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard N. Feist III,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


August 14, 2006

/s/ Howard N. Feist III
Howard N. Feist III
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,366
<PP&E>                                           3,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,381
<BONDS>                                          1,899
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        153
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                         580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,199
<SALES>                                          4,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,350
<CGS>                                            2,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    521
<INCOME-TAX>                                       180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                341
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       320
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Countrywide Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anne D. McCallion, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ANNE D. MCCALLIONAnne D. McCallion
Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2008


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Countrywide Financial Corporation and will be retained by Countrywide Financial Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION

We, Robert W. Hale, President, and J. L. Dickinson, Vice President, of
Continental Global Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.                    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                      quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully
                      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2.                    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                      in all material respects, the financial condition and
                      results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert W. Hale                       /s/ J. L. Dickinson
-----------------------------------      --------------------------------------
Robert W. Hale, President                J. L. Dickinson, Vice President

Dated:  August 16, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Eugene R. McGrath, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                       |  | /s/EUGENE R. MCGRATHEugene R. McGrath
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2003 |  |                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks