alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of World Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary B. Van Norman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 14, 2010 /s/ Gary B. Van NormanName: Gary B. Van NormanTitle: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Trunkbow International Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ye Yuan Jun, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Ye Yuan JunYe Yuan JunChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)




March 31, 2011
#### Julie NEWMAN, Appellant, v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, a public corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-766.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 13, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert J. Krist. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Datum Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
        period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2002


                                       /s/ Robert J. Krist
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Robert J. Krist
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11.2

<TABLE>
CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC
(in thousands of dollars and shares except per share amounts)
Twelve Weeks Ended April 29, 2000 and May 1, 1999
<CAPTION>
                                          Twelve Weeks Ended
                                         ----------------------
                                         April 29,     May 1,
                                            2000        1999
                                         ---------    ---------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>
Basic:
  Net earnings (loss) applicable to
    common shares:
      From continuing operations         $  2,180     $    706
      From discontinued operations              -         (632)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net earnings                     $  2,180     $     74
                                         =========    =========
Shares:
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding              17,820       17,763
  Less:  Treasury stock - weighted
    average                                (9,587)      (7,864)
                                         ---------    ---------
  Weighted average number of common
    and common equivalent shares
    outstanding                             8,233        9,899
                                         =========    =========
Net earnings (loss) per common and
    common equivalent shares:
      From continuing operations         $   0.26     $   0.07
      From discontinued operations              -        (0.06)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net earnings                     $   0.26     $   0.01
                                         =========    =========




</TABLE>



                              24
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-D, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         106,177
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,510
<PP&E>                                         2,142,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,907,494)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 378,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,946
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     372,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   378,883
<SALES>                                        113,358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,578
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  40,509<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                28,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            28,075
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   28,075
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2439 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2439

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on the amount individuals can deduct for certain State and local taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

  Ms. Underwood (for herself and Mr. Casten) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on the amount individuals can deduct for certain State and local taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SALT Fairness for Working Families 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN STATE AND LOCAL 
              TAXES OF INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 164(b)(6)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$10,000 ($5,000 in the case of a 
married individual filing a separate return)'' and inserting ``$15,000 
(twice such amount in the case of a joint return)''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 164(b) of such Code is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning after December 31, 2021, the $15,000 amount in 
        paragraph (6)(B) shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2020' for `calendar year 2016' in 
                subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
        If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence is not a 
        multiple of $100, such amount shall be rounded to the next 
        lowest multiple of $100.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2463 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2463

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the TSA to offer 
    certain secondary screenings of passengers prior to a physical 
inspection if an object of concern is detected, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2021

  Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the TSA to offer 
    certain secondary screenings of passengers prior to a physical 
inspection if an object of concern is detected, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TSA Second Screening Act''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF SECONDARY SCREENING.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 44901(l)(2) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``, including by ensuring passengers undergoing such 
screening are afforded an opportunity to undergo a second such 
screening prior to undergoing a physical inspection if such initial 
screening detects an object of concern''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Nuevo Energy Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-43329) on Form S-8, registration statement (No. 33-70108) on Form S-8,
registration statement (No. 333-21063) on Form S-8, registration statement (No.
333-51211) on Form S-8, registration statement (No. 333-51217) on Form S-8,
registration statement (No. 333-51231) on Form S-8, registration statement (No.
333-70780) on Form S-8, registration statement (No. 333-70774) on Form S-3,
registration statement (No. 333-100924) on Form S-8, registration statement (No.
333-85470) on Form S-8, registration statement (No. 333-46580) on Form S-3/A,
registration statement (No. 333-87899) on Form S-8, registration statement (No.
333-16231) on Form S-3, and registration statement (No. 333-101247) on Form S-3
of Nuevo Energy Company of our report dated March 17, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Nuevo Energy Company and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity, cash flows and comprehensive income for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and all related financial
statement schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report
on Form 10-K of Nuevo Energy Company.

Our report dated March 17, 2003, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that, effective January 1, 2000, the Company changed its method of accounting
for its processed fuel oil and natural gas liquids inventories and that
effective January 1, 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for
derivative instruments.




                                                        KPMG LLP



Houston, Texas
March 28, 2003
#### Clayton B. EDISEN v. Mrs. Adele Elvira USKALI, Wife of Clayton B. EDISEN.

No. 4002.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

June 1, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1970.

*529Montgomery, Barnett, Brown & Read, Walter M. Barnett and Peter H. Beer, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Sydney J. Parlongue, Philip R. Riegel, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before REDMANN, LeSUEUR and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.

LeSUEUR, Judge.

The parties to this action were judicially separated on October 4, 1967, and divorced on October 29, 1968. Each decree vested custody of their three minor children in Mrs. Edisen. On July 15, 1969, the trial court itself, in response to a rule filed by Dr. Edisen, took custody of the minors in loco parentis. A concurrent order was entered awarding *temporary*custody to Dr. Edisen, and Mrs. Edisen has appealed.

Appellant suggests, at the outset, that there is little precedent for a court assumption of custody in loco parentis under circumstances akin to those at bar. This seems true.

*530At the same time, we are reluctant to interfere. Ths court must and will recognize the broad discretion soundly vested in district courts in managing child welfare, just as it respects and recognizes the primacy of child welfare over all secondary considerations in the exercise of that discretion. A unique custody decree demands greater rather than lesser attention to these principles for unique decrees are, in the usual order of things, the product of unique circumstances.

Any number of circumstances may necessitate a greater measure of judicial supervision of child care than that normally enforced. We hold that judicial assumption of custody in loco parentis is reasonably responsive to such circumstances, so long as the principles generally governing child custody are not abused.

Appellant argues, however, that these principles were abused in this case, alleging that the trial court acted arbitrarily without a hearing and without the evidence necessary to support a change of custody. The record will not support these charges.

 Rather, it seems clear that a hearing was held. The fact that the hearing was held in chambers pursuant to LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2595 is irrelevant. What is relevant is that all parties were afforded the opportunity to appear and that the court interrogated those whose to do so. As to the substantive weight of the evidence which prompted the trial judge to order a change of custody, we rely once more upon the scope of his discretion.

Indeed, there is little else that *could*be done, for the record before us contains neither a transcript of the proceedings, nor a fact narrative by the trial court, nor a series of fact stipulations by the parties. These circumstances require dismissal of the appeal. See So-Cam, Inc. v. Atkins, La.App., 189 So.2d 742 (1st Cir. 1966), and Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co., 190 La. 415, 182 So. 556.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Appeal dismissed.
03/22/2022
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedMarch 27, 2004 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| *May 7, 2004* |   | By:                       | *  s/Robert  P. Story, Jr.* |   |
|---------------|--------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Date          |   | Robert P. Story, Jr.      |
|          |   | Senior Vice President and |
|          |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2010

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/25 3/29 4/1 31.00 28.00 29.00 88.00 0.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 4/1 4/5 4/8 34.00 28.00 29.00 26.00 111.00 6.00

4/8 4/12 4/15 26.00 27.00 28.00 85.00 -4.00

4/15 4/19 4/22 18.00 25.00 25.00 84.00 -16.00

4/22 4/26 4/29 15.00 24.00 25.00 84.00 -20.00

4/29 5/3 5/6 23.00 24.00 25.00 26.00 113.00 -15.00

5/6 5/10 5/13 26.00 25.00 26.00 81.00 -4.00

5/13 5/17 5/20 28.00 26.00 27.00 74.00 7.00

5/20 5/24 5/27 26.00 27.00 28.00 72.00 9.00

5/27 6/1 6/3 25.00 27.00 28.00 26.00 106.00 0.00

6/3 6/7 6/10 22.00 27.00 28.00 83.00 -6.00

6/10 6/14 6/17 18.00 26.00 27.00 86.00 -15.00

6/17 6/21 6/24 23.00 26.00 27.00 85.00 -9.00

1085.00 1152.00 -67.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

10-DAY 4/1 4/5 21.00 21.00 0.00

Matured 4/15

18-DAY 3/30 4/1 17.00 17.00 0.00

Matured 4/19

321-DAY Matures 4/1 35.00 -35.00

56-DAY BILL 3/31 4/1 25.00 25.00

Matures 5/27

56-DAY BILL 4/7 4/8 25.00 25.00

Matures 6/3

56-DAY BILL 4/14 4/15 25.00 25.00

Matures 6/10

56-DAY BILL 4/21 4/22 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 6/17

56-DAY BILL 4/28 4/29 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 6/24

56-DAY BILL 5/5 5/6 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 7/1

56-DAY BILL 5/12 5/13 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 7/8

56-DAY BILL 5/19 5/20 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 7/15

56-DAY BILL 5/26 5/27 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 7/22

56-DAY BILL 6/2 6/3 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 7/29 Matures 7/29

56-DAY BILL 6/9 6/10 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 8/5

56-DAY BILL 6/16 6/17 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 8/12

56-DAY BILL 6/23 6/24 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 8/19

339-DAY Matures 6/10 30.00 -30.00

343-DAY 6/8 6/10 30.00 30.00

Matures 5/19/11

33-DAY 5/12 5/13 30.00 30.00 0.00

Matures 6/15

303-DAY Matures 6/17 36.00 -36.00

CMB Funds: 4.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-year TIPS ® 4/1 4/5 4/15 8.00 2.00

3-year Note 4/1 4/6 4/15 40.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 4/1 4/7 4/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 4/1 4/8 4/15 13.00 0.00 40.96 41.04

5-year TIPS 4/22 4/26 4/30 11.00 4.00

2-year Note 4/22 4/27 4/30 44.00 0.00

5-year Note 4/22 4/28 4/30 42.00 0.00

7-year Note 4/22 4/29 4/30 32.00 0.00 30.00 99.00

3-year Note 5/5 5/11 5/17 38.00 -2.00

10-year Note 5/5 5/12 5/17 24.00 -1.00

30-year Bond 5/5 5/13 5/17 15.00 -1.00 30.89 46.11

2-year Note 5/20 5/25 6/1 42.00 -2.00

5-year Note 5/20 5/26 6/1 40.00 -2.00

7-year Note 5/20 5/27 6/1 31.00 -1.00 29.95 83.05

3-year Note 6/3 6/8 6/15 36.00 -2.00

10-year Note ® 6/3 6/9 6/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Note ® 6/3 6/10 6/15 13.00 0.00 13.60 56.40

2-year Note 6/17 6/22 6/30 40.00 -2.00

5-year Note 6/17 6/23 6/30 38.00 -2.00

7-year Note 6/17 6/24 6/30 30.00 -1.00 30.00 78.00

579.00 175.40 403.60

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 340.60
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2472 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2472

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 82422 Cadiz Jewett Road in Cadiz, Ohio, as the ``John Armor Bingham 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2021

   Mr. Johnson of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Chabot, Mr. 
  Davidson, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Joyce of 
Ohio, Mr. Latta, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Turner, and Mr. Wenstrup) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 82422 Cadiz Jewett Road in Cadiz, Ohio, as the ``John Armor Bingham 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN ARMOR BINGHAM POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 82422 Cadiz Jewett Road in Cadiz, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``John Armor Bingham Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Armor 
Bingham Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```