alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Brenda C. Barnes, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Dated: February 7, 2007             
|                                    
|/s/ Brenda C. Barnes,               
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1




SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF eMONEco INC.




In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mascot Ventures Inc. for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2013, the undersigned, Don Latson, President and Chief Executive Officer, principal accounting officer and principal financial officer, of eMONEco Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2013 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eMONEco Inc.









Date:  February 13, 2014







/s/ Don LatsonDon LatsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer, principal accounting officer andprincipal financial officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8

Ref: 8P-AR
Martha Rudolph Colorado Department ofPublic Health

and Environment 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 1595Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917**~ttp://www.epa.gov/region08** 

# NOV 012013..

RE: High Wind PM 10 Exceedance in Telluride onApril 16, 2013 Dear Ms. Rudolph: This letterresponds to the October 3, 2013 submittal for approval ofa high wind exceptional event demonstration for Telluride, Colorado. The Colorado Department ofPublic Health and Environment (CDPHE) determined that this regional high wind event caused an exceedance ofthe PM10National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) at the monitor in Telluride onApril16, 2013. EPA has reviewed the documentation provided by CDPHE to demonstrate that this exceedance meets the criteria for an exceptional event underthe Exceptional Events Rule (EER), 40 CFR 50.14. EPA concurs based onthe weight ofevidence that CDPHE has successfully made the demonstration necessary to comply with 40 CFR 50.14. In addition, CDPHE has metthe schedule and procedural requirements in section 50.14(c) withrespect to the demonstration. A more detailed assessment ofCDPHE's demonstration is enclosed. My staffhas entered "concurrence flags" for the Telluride data into EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). Based onthis determination, EPA will exclude these data from the following types ofcalculations and activities:
• EPA's AQS will not countthese days as exceedances when generating user reports, or include them in design values estimates, unless the AQS user specifically indicates that they should be included. • EPA will acceptthe exclusion ofthese data for the purposes ofselecting appropriate background concentrations for New Source Review air quality analyses. 1 • EPA will acceptthe exclusion ofthese data for the purposes ofselecting appropriate background concentrations for transportation conformity hot spot analyses.2

1IfEPA is the permitting authority, EPA will propose permits on this basis. IfEPA is commenting on anotherpermitting authority's proposed action, EPA's comments will be consistent with the determinations in this letter.The determination conveyed inthis letter does not constitute final EPA action regarding any matter on which EPA is required to provide an opportunity for public comment. In particular, this applies to determinations regarding the attainment status or classification ofthis area. Final actions will take place only after EPA completes notice and commentrulemaking on those determinations. As an additional clarification, the determination conveyed in this letter is applicable only to the PM10NAAQS. Ifyou or your staffhave any questions orwishto discuss this matter further, please contact Carl Daly at (303) 312-6416.

Enclosure Shaun L. McGrath Regional Administrator

cc: William Allison, CDPHE Air Pollution Control Division Gordon Pierce, CDPHE Air Pollution Control Division, Technical ServicesProgram

2Applicable only to PM 10 and PM2.5 2 

### @Printedon RecycledPaper
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2021*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter 8.80

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE^

3-Year Note 7/15 58.00 0.00

10-Year Note (r) 7/15 38.00 0.00

30-Year Bond (r) 7/15 24.00 0.00 55.98 64.02

10-Year TIPS 7/30 16.00 1.00 0.00 16.00

20-Year Bond (r) 8/2 24.00 0.00

2-Year Note 8/2 60.00 0.00

2-Year FRN 8/2 28.00 0.00

5-Year Note 8/2 61.00 0.00

7-Year Note 8/2 62.00 0.00 141.25 93.75

3-Year Note 8/16 58.00 0.00

10-Year Note 8/16 41.00 0.00

30-Year Bond 8/16 27.00 0.00 58.60 67.40

2-Year FRN (r) 8/27 26.00 0.00 0.00 26.00

30-Year TIPS (r) 8/31 8.00 1.00

20-Year Bond 8/31 27.00 0.00

2-Year Note 8/31 60.00 0.00

5-Year Note 8/31 61.00 0.00

7-Year Note 8/31 62.00 0.00 83.13 134.87

3-Year Note 9/15 58.00 0.00

10-Year Note (r) 9/15 38.00 0.00

30-Year Bond (r) 9/15 24.00 0.00 22.22 97.78

2-Year FRN (r) 9/24 26.00 0.00 0.00 26.00

20-Year Bond (r) 9/30 24.00 0.00

10-Year TIPS (r) 9/30 14.00 1.00

2-Year Note 9/30 60.00 0.00

5-Year Note 9/30 61.00 0.00

7-Year Note 9/30 62.00 0.00 82.61 138.39

1108.00 443.80 664.20

Estimates are italicized. r = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 673

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 08/02/2021 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2502 

To direct the Secretaries concerned to take certain actions to reduce genderrelated inequities in costs of uniforms to members of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2021 

Ms. BROWNLEY (for herself, Ms. SPEIER, and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretaries concerned to take certain actions 

to reduce gender-related inequities in costs of uniforms 

to members of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Pay for Service5 women Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF GENDER-RELATED INEQUITIES IN 

7 COSTS OF UNIFORMS TO MEMBERS OF THE 

8 ARMED FORCES. 

9 (a) IMPLEMENTATION OF GAO RECOMMENDA10 TIONS.—Not later than September 30, 2022, the SecVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:02 Jun 07, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2502.IH H2502

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2502 IH

1 retary of Defense shall implement the four recommenda2 tions of the Government Accountability Office in the re3 port titled ‘‘Military Service Uniforms DOD Could Better 

4 Identify and Address Out-of-Pocket Cost Inequities’’ 

5 (GAO–21–120). 

6 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than September 30, 

7 2022, each Secretary concerned (as that term is defined 

8 in section 101 of title 10, United States Code) shall pre9 scribe regulations that ensure the following: 

10 (1) The out-of-pocket cost to an officer or en11 listed member of an Armed Force for a uniform (or 

12 part of such uniform) may not exceed such cost to 

13 another officer or enlisted member of that Armed 

14 Force for such uniform (or part, or equivalent part, 

15 of such uniform) solely based on gender. 

16 (2) If a change to a uniform of an Armed Force 

17 affects only officers or enlisted members of one gen18 der, an officer or enlisted member of such gender in 

19 such Armed Force shall be entitled to an allowance 

20 equal to the out-of-pocket cost to the officer or en21 listed member relating to such change. 

22 (c) ONE-TIME ALLOWANCE.—Not later than Sep23 tember 30, 2022, each Secretary concerned shall provide 

24 a one-time allowance to each female officer and female enVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:02 Jun 07, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2502.IH H2502

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2502 IH

1 listed member under the jurisdiction of the Secretary con2 cerned. The amount of such an allowance shall be— 

3 (1) based on gender disparities in out-of-pocket 

4 costs relating to uniforms (including the costs of 

5 changes to uniforms that affected only one gender) 

6 during the 10 years preceding the date of the enact7 ment of this Act; and 

8 (2) proportional to the length of service of the 

9 officer or enlisted member in the Armed Forces. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,048,707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,381,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,523,307
<PP&E>                                       9,540,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,064,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,782,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,563,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,064,078
<SALES>                                        204,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,052
<CGS>                                           78,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  523,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (319,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (319,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (319,727)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT

| a)   | Employee acknowledges that his waiver of rights or claims arising under the ADEA is in writing, written in a manner calculated to be understood, and is understood by him; |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b)   | Employee expressly understands that this waiver refers to rights or claims arising under the ADEA; |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| c)   | Employee expressly understands that by execution of this Agreement, he does not waive any ADEA rights or claims that may arise after the date this Agreement is executed; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| d)   | Employee acknowledges that the waiver of his rights on claims arising under the ADEA is in exchange for the consideration outlined in paragraph 2 above, which is above and beyond that to which he is otherwise entitled to receive from CPI; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| e)   | Employee acknowledges that CPI expressly advised him by this Agreement to consult with an attorney of his choosing prior to executing this Agreement. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| JAMES MILLS   /s/James Mills   ________________________________                                                          James Mills | CONSUMER PROGRAMS INCORPORATEDA Missouri corporation  By:/s/Renato Cataldo_______________________________________Renato CataldoPresident and Chief Executive Officer  |     |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
Exhibit 12   AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)    Three Months EndedNine Months EndedSeptember 30,September 30,(dollars in thousands)2010200920102009Earnings:
Loss before benefit from income taxes$(117,569)$(129,404)$(177,313)$(609,297)Interest expense281,020283,988816,827822,678Implicit interest in rents3,6073,93511,35314,796Total earnings$ 167,058$ 158,519$ 650,867$ 228,177Fixed charges:
Interest expense$ 281,020$ 283,988$ 816,827$ 822,678Implicit interest in rents3,6073,93511,35314,796Total fixed charges$ 284,627$ 287,923$ 828,180$ 837,474Ratio of earnings to fixed charges*0.590.550.790.27  * Earnings were insufficient to cover total fixed charges by $117.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and $177.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Earnings were insufficient to cover total fixed charges by $129.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $609.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.    80
#### Woodrow Wilson JACKSON, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Charles Jackson WILES et al., Respondents.

No. 43855.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 23, 1973.

Petition denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
United States Position

Proposed MIGA Guarantees to EVN AG for an investment in Energji Ashta Shpk

January 31, 2012

The United States thanks management for its proposed $159 million guarantee to support the 

construction by EVN AG of a run-of-river hydropower project (HPP) on the Drini River in 

Albania. This HPP will add approximately 53 MW of new generation capacity to Albania’s 

under-supplied national electricity system.

By growing Albania’s renewable energy capacity, the project will help reduce the country’s peak 

load shedding and electricity imports that were caused by insufficient investment in electricity 

generation and maintenance of the system.

The United States is pleased with many of the elements of the proposed guarantee and supports

the development of renewable resources in Albania. The United States would like to draw 

particular attention to the project’s environmental mitigation measures, which include a fish 

ladder and provisions for ecological water releases.

Nevertheless, because the environmental impact assessment for this Category A project was not 

posted on MIGA’s website 120 days prior to board consideration, the United States must abstain 

for legislatively mandated reasons.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32448]



[[Page 65265]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Performance Review Board

    As required by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-
454), Chairman William E. Kennard appointed the following executives to 
the Performance Review Board: Ruth Milkman, Michelle Oppenheimer, Mary 
Beth Richards, Gerald Vaughan, Douglas Webbink.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32448 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 17

- 00784

- CV ESTATE OF Estella Q. CAMPOS , Deceased From the Probate Court No

. 2 , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014PC3884 Honorable Tom Rickhoff , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: January 24, 2018
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION In the case underlying this appeal, the trial court signed a n appealable order on September
22 , 2017. The deadline to f ile a motion for new trial was Octo ber 23 , 2017. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 329b(a). Because no motion for new trial or other timely postjudgment motion that would extend the deadline to file a notice of appeal was filed, the notice of appeal was due thirty days aft er the judgment wa s signed , on October 23, 2017

. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1. A motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due not later than November 7 , 2017. See id. R. 26.3. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on November 22 , 2017, fifteen days after the last day to timely file the notice

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26. 3

. Because Appellant’s notice of appeal appeared to be untimely, we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing not later than January 3, 2018, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. S ee T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a);04

- 17

- 00784

- CV

- 2

- Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[O] nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate
court ’ s jurisdiction .”). We warned Appellant that if s he failed to respond as ordered within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(c). On December 28, 2017, Appellant filed a partiall y completed docketing statement . B ut t o date, Appellant has not filed a response to our December 1 3 , 2017 order requiring her to show how this court has jurisdiction in this appeal

. Contra id. R. 42.3(c). We conclude Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, and Appellant did not invoke this court’s jurisdiction. See Verburgt , 959 S.W.2d at 617 . We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).
PER CURIAM
#### Charles A. CHAMBERS, Petitioner, v. Walter R. RUSHIN et al., Respondents.

No. 40525.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 5, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                  SUMMARY OF CORPORATE EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN

      Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. (the "COMPANY") has established a corporate
executive incentive plan. This plan provides non-discretionary bonus incentives
for the Company's executive officers based on profitability targets and
individual goals and objectives.

      The amount of the bonus depends on whether the executive meets or exceeds
one of three target levels: threshold, target or superior. The profitability
target is based upon the Company achieving a certain level of earnings per share
for the fiscal year. The individual goals and objectives for each executive are
based upon his areas of responsibility, including efforts to integrate and
consolidate the Company's acquired brands. The bonuses paid are determined each
year by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors as a
percentage of each corporate executive's annual compensation.

      James R. Riedman, Chairman, Richard E. White, Chief Executive Officer, and
Kenneth E. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer, are eligible to receive bonuses under
this plan in fiscal 2005.
#### Norman ENGLISH v. AMERICAN PUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50113.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 1, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1978.

William S. Lawson, Tupelo, for appellant.

Shell, Buford, Bufkin, Callicutt & Perry, Kenneth G. Perry, Robert M. Allen, Jr., Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
23.1





Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board
of Directors


CIB
Marine Bancshares, Inc.:





We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
338-85173, No. 333-72949 and No. 333-87268) on Form S-8 of CIB Marine
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 15, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which report appears in
the December 31, 2008, annual report on Form 10-K of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.
and subsidiaries.





Our
report dated April 15, 2009 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that
the Company's
inability to meet its obligations with regard to the trust preferred securities,
in addition to itscontinued net losses, and in consideration of existing
regulatory matters, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
that uncertainty.





/s/ KPMG LLP





April 15,
2009