alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of Elsinore Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean V. Schauer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: March 11, 2011
By:
/s/ Dean V. SchauerDean V. Schauer, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Electromed, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert D. Hansen, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
September 28, 2010

/s/ Robert D.
Hansen
Robert D. Hansen
Chief Executive Officer



---
#### Wells R. MEEKER, Appellant, v. Jesse F. LYLES and Annie H. Lyles, his wife, Appellees.

No. 71-659.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 27, 1972

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (FileNo. 333-122199, 333-114739 and 333-139179) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-121140, 333-105453 and333-135744) of Cash Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reportsdated March 14, 2007, except as to Notes 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, 15, 16, and 19which are as of May 14, 2007, relating tothe consolidated financial statements, the financial statement schedule, management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears on pages 21, 23, F-2, of this annual report on Form10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006.                   /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP  Minneapolis, Minnesota   May 14, 2007
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 240 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Labor to prioritize the provision of services 

to homeless veterans with dependents in carrying out 

homeless veterans reintegration programs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 240 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Veterans 

3 with Children Reintegration Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PRIORITY UNDER HOMELESS VETERANS RE5 INTEGRATION PROGRAMS FOR HOMELESS 

6 VETERANS WITH DEPENDENTS. 

7 (a) PRIORITY FOR HOMELESS VETERANS WITH DE8 PENDENT CHILDREN.—Subsection (a) of section 2021 of 

9 title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘Subject to’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

11 Subject to’’; 

12 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 

13 (5) as subparagraphs (A) through (E), respectively; 

14 and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(2) In conducting programs under this section, the 

18 Secretary shall prioritize the provision of services to home19 less veterans with dependents.’’. 

20 (b) ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Sub21 section (d) of such section is amended— 

22 (1) by striking ‘‘the report an evaluation of 

23 services’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘each 

24 such report—’’; and 

25 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 240 RFS

1 ‘‘(1) an evaluation of services furnished to vet2 erans under this section and an analysis of the infor3 mation collected under subsection (b); 

4 ‘‘(2) an analysis of any gaps in access to shel5 ter, safety, and services for homeless veterans with 

6 dependent children; and 

7 ‘‘(3) recommendations for improving any gaps 

8 identified under paragraph (2).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
BACTComparison‐Ameren/IPH#/MMBtuEmissions(tons)Emissions(tons)Reduction(tons)#/MMBtuEmissions(tons)Reduction(tons)Cofeen 1 18,5701.5414,33255713,7750.35 3,25011,082Cofeen 2 37,5451.4927999 1,12626,8730.35 6,57021,429Duck Creek 1 22,6350.9711026 67910,3470.35 3,9617,065E D Edwards 1 6,4173.5511399--0.35 1,12310,276E D Edwards 2 17,2221.7014666 51714,1490.35 3,01411,652E D Edwards 3 15,9721.219683 4799,2040.35 2,7956,888Hutsonville 5 3,1614.537163--0 0-7,163Hutsonville 6 3,4434.537791--0 0-7,791Joppa 1 13,5480.513441--0 0.35 2,3711,070Joppa 2 16,2580.514139--0 0.35 2,8451,294Joppa 3 15,3960.513947--0 0.35 2,6941,253Joppa 4 13,4020.523488--0 0.35 2,3451,143Joppa 5 15,0940.523932--0 0.35 2,6411,291Joppa 6 16,0630.524182--0 0.35 2,8111,371Meredosia 1 1,1345.022844--0 0-2,844Meredosia 2 1,3375.023356--0 0-3,356Meredosia 3 1,0695.042694--0 0-2,694Meredosia 4 1,4065.003518--0 0-3,518Meredosia 5 10,8102.3412639--0 0-12,639Newton 1 40,6310.459046--0 0.35 7,1101,936Newton 2 38,5330.468823--0 0.35 6,7432,080Totals 309,646170,10874,34850,275119,833Hutsonvile& Meredosia22,3600.353,913‐54,188115,920Base YearVariance(2017)BACT(0.06# /MMBtu)Facility/Unit MMMBtu03/18/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       41
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,851
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          987,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,360,572
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,343,344)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,851
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (74,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (74,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (74,292)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31303]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--LCX Translational CMOS Logic Development 
Agreement

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 9, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the partners to the 
LCX Translational CMOS Logic Development Agreement (``Agreement'') have 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in their 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Specifically, Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation has joined the 
venture. National Semiconductor Corporation has withdrawn from the 
venture. Both changes in membership became effective June 20, 1997.
    On September 7, 1994, the participants filed their original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on November 17, 1994 (59 FR 59434).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-31303 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0420 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 284

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
Retained Revision/Deactivation/ Removal/Inspection/Re placement from AD 2011

- 23

- 08 33.0 $2,805.0 0 $3,054 $5,859.00 605 $3,544,695.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $3,544,695 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ **On -**  **Condition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

Retained Replacement from AD 2011

- 23

- 08 8.0 $ 680.00 

### $0 $ 680.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

### Special **considerations for Economic Analysis** ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO 

### * Explanation 

### :
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MT98-5-000]


Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

December 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 5, 1997, Midcoast Interstate 
Transmission, Inc. (MIT) tendered for filing in its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become 
effective January 1, 1998:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 148
Third Revised Sheet No. 149
Third Revised Sheet No. 150

    MIT states that the purpose of the filing of the Revised Tariff 
Sheets is to update its tariff to reflect certain recent changes 
related to the offices and personnel of its marketing affiliate.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32712 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 9636.

#### The United States Coal Co. *v.*Graham.

(Decided December 21, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Jefferson County.

*Messrs. Henderson, Quail & Siddall*and *Mr. A. C. Lewis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. E. Erskine; Mr. J. W. Jordan*and *Mr. Dio Rogers,*for defendant in error.

Judgment modified as shown in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this "court, that the judgment of said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, modified so as to allow and permit plaintiff, the United States Coal Company, to erect and maintain upon and across the premises of defendant, or along the line of the premises of the defendant and the adjacent land-owners, such number of service poles as shall be reasonably required for the proper support of the power-transmitting wires of said coal company necessary to be used by said company in the proper and convenient mining by electricity of the coal now owned by it in Smithfield and Wells Townships, Jefferson County, Ohio. And it is ordered and adjudged by this court that this case be, and the same hereby is, remanded to the circuit court of Jefferson county with instructions to that court to hear evidence and determine and establish a line upon or across the premises in the petition described, or along the lines of the premises of the defendant and adjacent land-owners, upon which said poles may be erected and said wires may be strung, at such places and in such manner as will enable the coal company to properly, conveniently and economically carry on its business of mining as aforesaid, and as will not necessarily interfere with or impair *616the convenient use of defendant of his said premises.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Steve SIMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2522.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 25, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
### Informationfound at http://www.epa.gov!airexplorer!

utah Statewide NAAQS Summary

Year PM2.5 Exceedance Days PMIO Exceedance Days Ozone Exceedance Days N02Exceedance Days S02 Exceedance Days 8-hourCO Exceedance Days I-hourCO Exceedance Days Pb Exceedance Days 2005 56 

### 1 30 0 2 2 

### 0 0 2006 14 2 28 1 

### 0 0 

### 0 NotMonitored 2007 28 4 31 1 1 1 1 NotMonitored 2008 21 4 

### 13 0 3 

### 0 0 NotMonitored 2009 33 

### 2 8 1 3 

### 0 0 NotMonitored 

### 2010 19 

### 2 44 1 

### 0 0 0 NotMonitored

Utah Statewide Flagged Exceedance Summary

Year PM2.5 Flagged Exceedance Days PM10 Flagged Exceedance Days Ozone Exceedance Days N02Flagged Exceedance Days S02 Flagged Exceedance Days B-hourCO Flagged Exceedance Days I-hourCO Flagged Exceedance Days Pb Flagged Exceedance Days 2005 1 1 7 0 

### 0 0 0 0 2006 

### 0 2 

### 6 0 0 0 0 NotMonitored 2007 4 3 9 0 

### 0 0 

### 0 NotMonitored 

### 2008 3 4 2 

### 0 0 0 0 NotMonitored 2009 2 2 

### 0 0 

### 0 0 0 NotMonitored 2010 4 

### 2 

### 0 0 

# a 0 0 NotMonitored
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, L.M. (Theo) de Kool, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2008                                                     
|                                                                       
|/s/ L.M. (Theo) de Kool,                                               
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
#### Dennis E. GERMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44218.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 741.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation
(the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brenda C. Barnes, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Dated: February 9, 2006             
|                                    
|/s/ Brenda C. Barnes,               
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### Uriel BLOUNT, Jr., Judge, etc., Petitioner, v. Bill L. BRYANT, Respondent.

No. 42430.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 14, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 847.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
MAINTENANCE LOG DESCRIPTION VERSION

November 5, 2013 Install 5.8Ghz Receiver Firmware 1.0.1.3

April 15, 2014 Installation of DJI Phantom 2 Vision Prop Guards —

June 6, 2014 Replacement (4) DJI Phantom 2 Vision Self Tightening Propellors —

July 17, 2014 Replacement (4) DJI Phantom 2 Vision Self Tightening Propellors —

October 28, 2014 Update Gimbal Firmware 1.0.0.6

November 4, 2014 Update 5.8GHz Remote Controller 1.0.2.30

November 28, 2014 Update Phantom 2 Vision+ Central Board Firmware 1.0.2.10

January 16, 2015 Update DJI Camera 1.3.0

January 30, 2015 Update Mac Assistant Firmware 3.8

February 6, 2015 Update iOS App 1.0.48

February 24, 2015 Replacement (4) DJI Phantom 2 Vision Self Tightening Propellors —

March 3, 2015 Update Phantom 2 Vision+ Autopilot System 3.12

Table 1

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINES SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                           1,365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  631,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    654,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,307,842
<PP&E>                                         505,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 254,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,715,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,142,037
<BONDS>                                        166,051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,274
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,715,180
<SALES>                                      1,030,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,030,205
<CGS>                                          949,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  949,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,053
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (118)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,171
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,171
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1.2

Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Joan S. Freilich, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                        | /s/JOAN S. FREILICHJoan S. Freilich
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------
|Dated: November 7, 2003 |                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks