alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2010-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by Great Lakes Education Loan Services, Inc., as subservicer, ACS Education Services, Inc., as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 27, 2014



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2013

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 6/27 7/1 7/4 30.00 30.00 25.00 98.00 -13.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 7/3 7/8 7/11 35.00 30.00 25.00 93.00 -3.00

7/11 7/15 7/18 35.00 30.00 25.00 93.00 -3.00

7/18 7/22 7/25 40.00 30.00 25.00 25.00 115.00 5.00

7/25 7/29 8/1 45.00 30.00 25.00 87.00 13.00

8/1 8/5 8/8 45.00 30.00 25.00 92.00 8.00

8/8 8/12 8/15 45.00 30.00 25.00 94.00 6.00

8/15 8/19 8/22 45.00 30.00 25.00 25.00 125.00 0.00

8/22 8/26 8/29 45.00 30.00 25.00 105.00 -5.00

8/29 9/2 9/5 40.00 30.00 25.00 105.00 -10.00

9/5 9/9 9/12 40.00 30.00 25.00 105.00 -10.00

9/12 9/16 9/19 40.00 30.00 25.00 25.00 130.00 -10.00

9/19 9/23 9/26 35.00 30.00 25.00 105.00 -15.00

1310.00 1347.00 -37.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

2-year note 6/20 6/25 7/1 35.00 0.00

5-year note 6/20 6/26 7/1 35.00 0.00

7-year note 6/20 6/27 7/1 29.00 0.00 58.27 40.73

3-year Note 7/3 7/9 7/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 7/3 7/9 7/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 7/3 7/9 7/15 13.00 0.00 55.02 10.98

10-year TIPS 7/11 7/18 7/31 15.00 0.00

2-year note 7/18 7/23 7/31 35.00 0.00

5-year note 7/18 7/24 7/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 7/18 7/25 7/31 29.00 0.00 59.36 54.64

3-year Note 7/31 8/6 8/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note 7/31 8/7 8/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 7/31 8/8 8/15 16.00 0.00 69.56 2.44

5-year TIPS ® 8/15 8/22 9/3 16.00 2.00

2-year note 8/22 8/27 9/3 34.00 -1.00

5-year note 8/22 8/28 9/3 35.00 0.00

7-year note 8/22 8/29 9/3 29.00 0.00 59.91 54.09

3-year Note 9/5 9/10 9/16 31.00 -1.00

10-year Note ® 9/5 9/11 9/16 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 9/5 9/12 9/16 13.00 0.00 33.36 31.64

10-year TIPS ® 9/12 9/19 9/30 13.00 0.00

2-year note 9/19 9/24 9/30 33.00 -1.00

5-year note 9/19 9/25 9/30 35.00 0.00

7-year note 9/19 9/26 9/30 29.00 0.00 62.31 47.69

640.00 397.78 242.22

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 205
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP91-54-013]


Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of Annual Reconciliation Report

February 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 31, 1997, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline) tendered for filing working papers reflecting its fifth 
annual take-or-pay volumetric surcharge reconciliation. Trunkline 
states that the information is submitted pursuant to Article II, 
Section 8 of the Stipulation and Agreement in the above-captioned 
proceeding which requires Trunkline to submit, on an annual basis a 
report of the take-or-pay volumetric surcharge amounts collected from 
its customers.
    Trunkline states that copies of this filing have been served on all 
affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and parties to 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before February 11, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[Fr Doc. 97-3146 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
-·-5 ·'

## RTI,-r**~.** 

### ::fl.
.

## 111ENT OF i"HANSPORTATION 

## .,,'_)(:KET**OPER,~TIONS** 

# Memorandum
U.S.Departmentof Transportation OfficeoftheSecretary ofTransportation 

### ZOIZAPR l g 

### P 12: 05

Subject: Payoutprocedures as a result ofthe temporary closure of Rutland-Southern Vermont Regional Airport 

# ;r.rDOT-OST-200d81)

# -D~~aef~ EAS & Domestic Analysis, X-53
To: Gregory Frazier, Resource Directorate, S-:3.6
Rutland-Southern Vermont Regionai Airport (RUT) Date: April19, 2012
OAA Memo No. 2012-36 Reply to Brian Swanson, X-53 Attn. of: Ext. 65392

TheRutland-Southern VermontRegional Airport provided notiCe to Cape Air that it would close its mainrunway for constructionrelated to an instrument landing system;from April30, 2012, through May 4, 2012. Cape Air currently provides subsidizedEAS at Rutland for a rate of$375 per arrival/departure. Ithas been our policy, on a case-by-casebasis, to pay EAS carriers their usual subsidy rate when airports havebeen closed on the grounds that the circumstances are beyond the carriers' control and there are only minimal cost savings to the carriers while they lose all ofthe revenue. The carriers would only save on fuel and a portion ofmaintenance because they would not be able to tum back aircraft orlay-offpersonnel. Consistent with this precedent, we ask you to compensate Cape Air for flights it did not operate during tlie upcoming construction.
Attachment

cc: Mr. Andrew Bonney, Cape Air Mr. David Carmen, Rutland-Southern Vermont Regional AirportSwanson, Brian (OST) From: Sent: To: Cc: Devany, Dennis (OST) Wednesday, April18, 201211:38 AM Andrew Bonney Swanson, Brian (OST) Subject: RE: RUT Runway Closures for ILS Construction April 30-May 4
Yes. From: Andrew Bonney rmailto:Andrew.Bonney@capeair.coml Sent: Wednesday, April18, 2012 10:47 AM To: Devany, Dennis (OST) Subject: FW: RUT Runway Closures for ILS Construction April 30-May 4 Hi Dennis, FYI, the Rutland Airport is also closing down the main runway for navaid work, April 30- May 4. The remaining crosswind runway is only 3,170 feet, too short even for the Cessna 402. I presume the same guidance applies regarding billing and payment as we are implementing at Augusta, Maine? Andrew Bonney Vice President ofPlanning Cape Air .660 Barnstable Rd. Hyannis, MA 02601 0: 508 862-9719/C: 508 648-5911 IF: 508 957-6919 andrew.bonney@capcair.com

## ~IJ From Rutland Aiq)ort manager David Carman:
Dates are set for the RWY 1/19 shutdown for ILS construction. April30- May4. Please pass this along to those at Cape Air thatneed to be advised ofthe shutdown. Thanks David E. Carman, Airport Manager Rutland-Southern VermontRegional Airport 1002 Airport Road, Terminal Building, North Clarendon, VT 05759 (802) 786-8881 [Office], (802) 282-5432 [Cell] david.carman@state.vt.us 1From: Carman, David Sent: Tuesday, March 27,2012 1:49PM To: Michael Pires Subject: RUT Runway Closures for ILS Construction Hi Michael, Please see attached PDF. DavidE. Carman, Airport Manager Rutland-Southern Vermont Regional Airport 1002 Airport Road, Terminal Building, North Clarendon, VT 05759 (802) 786-8881 [Office], (802) 282-5432 [Cell] david.carman@state.vt.us

2
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-17-00071-CV

____________________

WATERSTONE ON LAKE CONROE, INC. AND STEVE BOWEN,

Appellants

V.

DEE WILLIAMS AND ANDY WILLIAMS, Appellees

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-09-10736-CV 

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

On March 16, 2017, the Court stayed all further trial court proceedings and 

discovery in Cause Number 16-09-10736-CV until our opinion issues in the 

accelerated appeal. The appellees, Dee Williams and Andy Williams, subsequently 

notified the parties and the Court that they are withdrawing their request for 

disclosure to Virgin Homes, Inc. They suggest their withdrawal of the request for 

disclosure will moot a related mandamus proceeding, No. 09-17-00077-CV, In re 
2

Virgin Homes, Inc. In response, the appellees and Virgin Homes, Inc. contend the 

withdrawal of the request for disclosure cannot moot the mandamus proceeding 

while the trial court’s order of February 28, 2017, remains in effect compelling 

Virgin Homes, Inc. to respond to the request for disclosure.

Unless it is amended by this Court, our order of March 16, 2017, prevents the 

trial court from considering the appellees’ request to withdraw their request for 

disclosure and reconsidering its February 28, 2017, order compelling Virgin Homes, 

Inc. to respond to the request for disclosure. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.5. After 

considering the letters filed by the parties, we conclude that our order of March 16, 

2017, should be amended to allow Dee Williams and Andy Williams to withdraw 

their request for disclosure and to allow the trial court to amend or dissolve its order 

of February 28, 2017. See id. 

It is ORDERED that all further trial court proceedings and discovery in Cause 

Number 16-09-10736-CV, other than proceedings to withdraw requests for 

disclosure and to amend or dissolve the trial court’s order compelling responses to 

requests for disclosure, are STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further order 

of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3; see also Tex. R. App. P. 29.5.

ORDER ENTERED March 21, 2017.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS. 1350)

The undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President
of Finance and Assistant Treasurer of Cotton States Life Insurance Company,
certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cotton
States Life Insurance Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. The
foregoing certification is made pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other
person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any other
purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the
foregoing certification except as required by law.



                               /s/   J. Ridley Howard
Date:  08/6/03                 -------------------------------------
                               J. Ridley Howard
                               President and Chief Executive Officer



                               /s/   William J. Barlow
Date: 08/6/03                  -------------------------------------------------
                               William J. Barlow
                               Vice President of Finance and Assistant Treasurer


                                       24
DENY; and Opinion Filed May 6, 2019
.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00480
- CV
IN RE PETRONA DEL CA RMEN VALENCIA
- DE RIV AS , Relator Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 10235 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Molberg In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial co urt’s order denying relator’s motion to disqualify the real party in interest Guadalupe Vielma Ramirez’s trial counsel. “Mandamus is available where a motion to disqualify is inappropriately denied as there is no adequate remedy on appeal.” In re Turner , 542 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Tex. 2017) (quoting In re Columbia Valley Healthcare Sys., L.P. , 320 S.W.3d 819, 824 n.2 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding) )

. We review a trial court’s refusal to disqualify a law firm under an abuse of discretion standard. Id.
Based o n the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.– 2

–

52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines re lator is not entitled to the relief sought).

190480F.P05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MT98-1-001]


Mid Louisiana Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

December 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 12, 1997, Mid Louisiana Gas Company 
(Mid Louisiana) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff, with an effective 
date of November 1, 1997:

    Sixth Revised Sheet No. 131

    Mid Louisiana states that the purpose of the filing of the Revised 
Tariff Sheet is to comply with Commission letter order dated November 
6, 1997 in docket number MT98-1-000 (81 FERC, para. 62,124) in which 
the Commission instructed Mid Louisiana to re-file the referenced sheet 
with a corrected superseded sheet number.
    Pursuant to section 154.7(a)(7) of the Commission's Regulations, 
Mid Louisiana respectfully requests waiver of any requirement of the 
Regulations in order to permit the tendered tariff sheet to become 
effective November 1, 1997, as submitted.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this compliance filing are on file 
with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32236 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
H. R. 203 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4020 Broadway 

Street in Houston, Texas, as the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. BENNY C. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Bernard B. WEKSLER, Appellant, v. CROWN COLONY CLUB, INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 72-1088.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 5, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
338-85173, No. 333-72949 and No. 333-87268) on Form S-8 of CIB Marine
Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated October 28, 2005 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December
31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. Our report
refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill in 2002 for the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 147,
Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions as discussed in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements. In addition, our report refers to the
restatement of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements.

                 /s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
October 28, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2766
HENRY T. SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND; COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-2216-DKC) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry T. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sanders v. Maryland , No. CA-95-2216-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 11, 1995; Sept. 13, 1995; Oct. 11, 19 95). We deny Appellant's motions for sanctions and judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Gary R. ROTH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-1447.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 6, 2002.

Decided Aug. 9, 2002.

Before BAUER, EASTERBROOK, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

Order

In this collateral attack, based on *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Gary Roth contends that a failure to allege drug quantity in an indictment is a “jurisdictional” defect. After Roth filed his brief, the Supreme Court rejected that contention. *3See *United States v. Cotton,*— U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 1781, 152 L.Ed.2d 860 (2002). Moreover, we have held that *Apprendi*does not apply retroactively on collateral review. See *Curtis v. United States,*294 F.3d 841 (7th Cir.2002). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Theundersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2007 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| *May 9, 2007* | * *                | *By:* | *s/James F. Conway III* | * * |
|---------------|-------------------------|-------|-------------------------|----------|
| Date          | James F. Conway III     |
|          | Chairman, President and |
|          | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, norshall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

----