alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CONTINENTAL INS. CO. and County of Volusia, Appellants, v. J. B. BELFLOWER, Appellee.

No. GG-443.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 22, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 27, 1978.

Robert K. Rouse, Jr. of Smalbein, Eu-bank, Johnson, Rosier & Bussey, P.A., Day-tona Beach, for appellants.

Sylvan A. Wells of Stern, LaRue & Wells, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

Volusia County and its insurer appeal from a money judgment entered on a jury verdict that appellee Belflower was damaged to the extent of $50,000 when he was injured as his car struck a concrete slab off the surface of a narrow dirt road near Edgewater. The judgment was for $10,000, reflecting the jury’s finding that Belflower’s negligence was 80 percent responsible for the accident and the County’s negligence was 20 percent responsible.

The evidence was insufficient to submit to the jury the issue of the County’s asserted negligence in failing to clear obstacles from the grassy area adjoining the road and in failing to post signs warning of such obstacles. There is no evidence of formal dedication of the road. Belflower’s case rests entirely on Section 95.361, Florida Statutes (1975), which presumes dedication from county maintenance and repair “continuously and uninterruptedly for four years.” There was evidence that a county commissioner caused the road to be cut many years ago and that twice since then other commissioners caused shell to be placed on portions of the road for the convenience of hunters. But there was an entire absence of evidence that even these desultory activities occurred within a four year period, or that the county performed any inspection or repair “continuously and uninterruptedly for four years” on what otherwise must be regarded as a private road. The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded for entry of judgment for appellants.

REVERSED.

ERVIN, J., concurs.

BOOTH, J., dissents.

BOOTH, Judge,

dissenting.

A jury question was presented as to whether the road where the accident occurred was a county road under *Florida*
      *841
      *Statute*§ 95.361. The evidence presented here was substantially similar to that in *Pasco County v. Johnson,*67 So.2d 639 (Fla.1953) wherein the court held that the county’s cleaning up of bush, stumps and trees and filling up of holes and ruts in an unpaved rural road satisfies the statutory requirements of a presumed dedication. Accord, *Lovey v. Escambia County,*141 So.2d 761 (1st DCA 1962), findings of trial court and testimony quoted at 141 So.2d 770-771.

A closer question, but still one for the jury, was presented as to the county’s negligence in failing to warn of, or to remove, the hidden concrete abutment, an unexpected and unnatural obstacle, immediately adjacent to the edge of the narrow roadway.

I would affirm the judgment below.
U.S. Position on the World Bank’s 

Interim Strategy Note for Madagascar 

February 21, 2012 

The United States appreciates the role the Bank Group could potentially play in improving 

governance and private sector opportunity and addressing poverty in Madagascar. However, the 

United States continues to view the de facto government in Madagascar as an illegitimate 

regime, and has serious concerns about the steady deterioration in the rule of law, as reflected, 

among other things, in the alarming increase in the problem of human trafficking. Moreover, 

there is a risk that World Bank support could be misconstrued as a signal of support to the de 

facto regime, and could allow the de facto leaders to divert resources away from their intended 

use while continuing to profit from illicit activities. For these reasons, the United States intends 

to oppose new World Bank financing and/or engagement in Madagascar. 

The combination of chronic political instability and declining economic trends is contributing to 

the steady deterioration of key social and economic indicators in Madagascar, dealing a 

significant blow to poverty reduction efforts. The World Bank has an understandable interest in 

ensuring that the performance of its limited existing portfolio in Madagascar stays on track and 

does not degrade to an irreversible level. The United States notes the Bank’s painstaking efforts 

to ring-fence new projects to keep funds from the de facto regime, and appreciates staff’s candor 

in describing the Bank’s ongoing challenges in dealing with the de facto regime, especially as 

dialogue remains constrained among the parties at the senior policy levels. 

However, these factors must be measured against the actions of the illegitimate regime. Most 

notably, the scale and impact of human trafficking in Madagascar have reached alarming 

proportions, and those who victimize women and children appear to operate with impunity. 

These practices are not only morally abhorrent, but also have severe economic consequences. 

They undermine the rule of law, seriously harm the health and welfare of victims, permanently 

damaging their productivity, and fuel the growth of criminal gangs and instability. Yet, 

Madagascar has failed to address this issue, as laws are not enforced and prevention measures 

have been allowed to slip. 

In sum, while the Bank’s rationale for advancing programs that address the dire poverty in 

Madagascar is clear, the United States cannot support and will seek to prevent the Bank’s 

reengagement in Madagascar until and unless there is a legitimate government in place and such 

government takes substantial steps to address the growing problem of human trafficking.
#### Bernard DORFMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-1173.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 18, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliott H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before ' PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on May 25,1976 (333 So.2d 481) affirmed and reversed in part and remanded the judgment and sentence of the circuit court for Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, 351 So.2d 954, by its opinion and judgment filed July 28, 1977 and mandate now lodged in this court affirmed this court’s judgment and sentence except to remand the cause for resentencing.

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on July 14, 1976 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed in this cause on May 25,1976 except as is affirmed by the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida dated July 28, 1977 is vacated and said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment and sentence appealed from herein is reversed in part and affirmed in part and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with the views expressed herein. Costs allowed shall be *968taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16 b Florida Appellate Rules).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: December 17-19, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: Embassy Suites, Chevy Chase, MD.
    Contact Person: Dr. Paul Strudler, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4144, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1716.

    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: December 17, 1997.
    Time: 2:15 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4136, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Gordon Johnson, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4136, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1212.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
above meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the grant review and funding cycle.

    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: December 23, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4112, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Gopal Sharma, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4112, Bethesda, Maryland 
20897, (301) 435-1783.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-32086 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
February 18, 2022

Dear Tribal Leader,

We are emailing to share reminders and opportunities for assistance regarding Treasury’s Coronavirus 

Capital Projects Fund. The Capital Projects Fund makes funds available to recipients that would like to 

make investments in high-quality, affordable broadband infrastructure, devices to facilitate internet 

access, such as laptops or wi-fi equipment, and multi-purpose community facilities. The Capital Projects 

Fund Guidance for Tribal Governments describes in detail how your Tribal government may access and 

use these funds. More information and other resources can be found on the Capital Projects Fund page

for Tribal Governments.

1. All Applications Must Be Submitted by June 1, 2022: Tribal governments must complete a short 

application to verify applicant eligibility and to explain how Capital Projects Fund grant funds will 

be used. Applications will be submitted using the Treasury Application Portal. 

2. The Capital Projects Fund Will Begin Hosting Weekly Office Hours on Thursday, February 24th, 

3-4PM ET: To support Tribal governments to complete and submit applications for the Capital 

Projects Fund, Treasury will host weekly office hours to provide the opportunity to ask questions 

about the application process, eligible uses, and other topics. Capital Projects Fund Office Hours 

for Tribal Governments will be held every Thursday from 3:00-4:00 PM ET, beginning on 

Thursday, February 24th. We invite you to attend to learn more about applying and accessing 

funds to address critical needs in your communities. Office Hours can be accessed by registering 

using this link: 

https://ustreasury.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItcuGqpz4sHXkhnaNUiJUjgAJsA3sOeuY

3. Treasury Is Reviewing and Approving Tribal Projects: Treasury has already approved a number 

of Tribal projects, making funds available for eligible investments. In addition to directly 

notifying Tribal Governments of their awards, Treasury will be posting short descriptions of 

approved projects on the Capital Projects Fund website. These descriptions will be consistent 

with the format used by NTIA when sharing information about Tribal projects, and are intended 

to provide information to other Tribal governments as they apply to the Capital Projects Fund. 

Please do not hesitate to reach out as you prepare your Capital Projects Fund application; please email 

capitalprojectsfund@treasury.gov with any questions. We look forward to seeing you at upcoming 

Capital Projects Fund Office Hours.

Thank you,

The Capital Projects Fund team
#### Gilbert R. MYERS, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 74-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 19, 1974.

Habeas corpus denied.
**Exhibit 32**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Gidwitz, theChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, JosephJ. Sum, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and Section 1350, of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that toour knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.

 

 

November 13, 2007

 
|   | By:    | /s/ James G. Gidwitz      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   | James G. Gidwitz          |
|   |   | Chairman of the Board and |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer   |
|   |   |                      |

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Joseph J. Sum                           |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Joseph J. Sum                               |
|   |   | Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|   |   |                                        |

 

 

 

----
#### Dwinda THOMPSON, Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Neill Ross Manning and Bill Nelson, Appellees.

No. 76-2538.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 31, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 28, 1978.

*814F. Sheilds McManus of McManus & Kennedy, P.A., and Paul A. Gamba of Tooker & Gamba, P.A., Stuart, for appellant.

Robert J. Gorman of Brennan, McAliley, Albury & Hayskar, Fort Pierce, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and LETTS, J., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents with opinion.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The award of the jury was wholly inadequate to cover the loss suffered by appellant as a result of the negligence of the individual appellees. In the record there is evidence that the jury misunderstood at least some of the court’s instructions and it is reasonable to believe they may not have understood all of the instructions. I would reverse judgment and award a new trial for appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-06-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-22-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<CASH>                                 (106)
<SECURITIES>                         24,557
<RECEIVABLES>                        11,435
<ALLOWANCES>                            521
<INVENTORY>                          10,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     57,222
<PP&E>                              231,798
<DEPRECIATION>                      151,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      169,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                46,023
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              7,131
<OTHER-SE>                           51,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        169,714
<SALES>                             127,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    127,746
<CGS>                                15,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       120,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       6,447
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   4,191
<DISCONTINUED>                         (583)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          3,608
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.43






</TABLE>
#### Nat G. KIEFER v. Judge Ernest N. MORIAL et al.

No. 60987.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1977.

In re: Nat G. Kiefer applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. 351 So.2d 1216.

Writ denied. Relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents. I would grant this writ. This Court has too hastily and not adequately considered the important issues presented.
<PAGE>   1
                HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Years Ended October 31,
                                                                      -----------------------
                                                                   1996          1995          1994
                                                                   ----          ----          ----
<S>                                                              <C>             <C>           <C>  
Primary Earnings Per Share:
Earnings data:
   Net income                                                    $ 8,186         9,602         7,724
                                                                 =======        ======        ======

Weighted average shares outstanding
   Average shares of common stock outstanding                     16,994        16,263        15,786
   Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the
     treasury stock method using average market price              1,295         1,144           888
                                                                 -------        ------        ------
   Weighted average shares outstanding                            18,289        17,407        16,674
                                                                 =======        ======        ======
Earnings per common share:
   Net income                                                    $  0.45          0.55          0.46
                                                                 =======        ======        ======
</TABLE>
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2006

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/29 1/3 1/5 8.00 17.00 15.00 47.00 -7.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 1/5 1/9 1/12 8.00 18.00 16.00 47.00 -5.00

1/12 1/17 1/19 8.00 20.00 17.00 45.00 0.00

1/19 1/23 1/26 12.00 20.00 17.00 46.00 3.00

1/26 1/30 2/2 12.00 20.00 17.00 43.00 6.00

2/2 2/6 2/9 18.00 20.00 17.00 43.00 12.00

2/9 2/13 2/16 21.00 20.00 17.00 42.00 16.00

2/16 2/21 2/23 25.00 20.00 17.00 46.00 16.00

2/23 2/27 3/2 25.00 20.00 17.00 45.00 17.00

3/2 3/6 3/9 25.00 20.00 17.00 51.00 11.00

3/9 3/13 3/16 25.00 20.00 17.00 54.00 8.00

3/16 3/20 3/23 25.00 18.00 16.00 58.00 1.00

3/23 3/27 3/30 20.00 18.00 16.00 57.00 -3.00

699.00 624.00 75.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

13-DAY BILL 2/28 3/1 3/2 20.00 20.00 0.00

Matures 3/15

0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

5-Year Note 1/9 1/11 1/16 13.00 13.00

10-Year TIPS (R) 1/9 1/12 1/16 9.00 9.00

20-Year TIPS (R) 1/19 1/24 1/31 10.00 10.00

2-Year Note 1/23 1/25 1/31 22.00 2.00 25.61 -3.61

3-Year Note 2/1 2/7 2/15 20.00 2.00 20.00

10-Year Note 2/1 2/8 2/15 13.00 13.00

30-Year Bond 2/1 2/9 2/15 15.00 15.00 17.28 -2.28

2-Year Note 2/16 2/22 2/28 22.00 22.00

5-Year Note 2/16 2/23 2/28 15.00 2.00 26.00 -11.00

10-Year Note (R) 3/6 3/9 3/15 8.00 8.00

2-Year Note 3/23 3/27 3/31 22.00 22.00

5-Year Note 3/23 3/29 3/31 15.00 26.01 -11.01

184.00 94.88 89.11

Estimates are italicized

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 164.11

R = Reopening
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 5, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Regions Financial Corporation, Birmingham, Alabama; to merge 
with Greenville Financial Corporation, Greenville, South Carolina, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Greenville National Bank, Greenville, South 
Carolina.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Paramount Bancorp, Inc., Bingham Farms, Michigan; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Paramount Bank (in organization), Bingham Farms, Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 5, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32341 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F