64354 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 1997 / Notices

both antidumping and countervailing

duty reviews, the interested party must

specify for which individual producers

or exporters covered by an antidumping

finding or an antidumping or

countervailing duty order it is

requesting a review, and the requesting

party must state why it desires the

Secretary to review those particular

producers or exporters. If the interested

party intends for the Secretary to review

sales of merchandise by an exporter (or

a producer if that producer also exports

merchandise from other suppliers)

which were produced in more than one

country of origin and each country of

origin is subject to a separate order, then

the interested party must state

specifically, on an order-by-order basis,

which exporter(s) the request is

intended to cover.

Seven copies of the request should be

submitted to the Assistant Secretary for

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S.

Department of Commerce, 14th Street &

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230. The

Department also asks parties to serve a

copy of their request to the Office of

Antidumping/Countervailing

Enforcement, Attention: Sheila Forbes,

in room 3065 of the main Commerce

Building. Further, in accordance with

section 351.303(f)(1)(i) of the

regulations, a copy of each request must

be served on every party on the

Department’s service list.

The Department will publish in the

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation

of Administrative Review of

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty

Order, Finding, or Suspended

Investigation’’ for requests received by

the last day of December 1997. If the

Department does not receive, by the last

day of December 1997, a request for

review of entries covered by an order,

finding, or suspended investigation

listed in this notice and for the period

identified above, the Department will

instruct the Customs Service to assess

antidumping or countervailing duties on

those entries at a rate equal to the cash

deposit of (or bond for) estimated

antidumping or countervailing duties

required on those entries at the time of

entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,

for consumption and to continue to

collect the cash deposit previously

ordered.

This notice is not required by statute

but is published as a service to the

international trading community.

Dated: November 28, 1997.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Group II,

Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–31936 Filed 12–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–421–804]

Cold-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat

Products From the Netherlands;

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review; Extension of Time Limit

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time

limit.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is extending the time

limit of the final results of the

antidumping duty administrative review

of Cold-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat

Products from the Netherlands. This

review covers the period August 1, 1995

through July 31, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen Kramer or Linda Ludwig, Office

of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0405 or

482–3833, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to the

complexity of issues involved in this

case, it is not practicable to complete

this review within the original time

limit. The Department is extending the

time limit for completion of the final

results until March 8, 1998, in

accordance with Section 751(a)(3)(A) of

the Trade and Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act of 1994. See

memorandum to Robert S. La Russa

from Joseph A. Spetrini regarding the

extension of case deadline, dated

November xx, 1997.

This extension is in accordance with

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of

1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.

1675(a)(3)(A)).

Dated: November 24, 1997.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement

Group III.

[FR Doc. 97–31937 Filed 12–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–580–811]

Steel Wire Rope from the Republic of

Korea: Preliminary Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review and Intent To Revoke

Antidumping Duty Order in Part

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of

antidumping duty administrative review

and intent to revoke antidumping duty

order in part.

SUMMARY: In response to requests by the

petitioner, the Committee of Domestic

Steel Wire Rope & Specialty Cable

Manufacturers, and by six

manufacturers/exporters of subject

merchandise, the Department of

Commerce is conducting an

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on steel wire

rope from Korea. The review covers 15

manufacturers/exporters of the subject

merchandise. The period of review is

March 1, 1996, through February 28,

1997.

We have preliminarily found that, for

certain exporters, sales of subject

merchandise have been made below

normal value. If these preliminary

results are adopted in our final results

of this administrative review, we will

instruct the Customs Service to assess

antidumping duties based on the

difference between the export price and

the normal value. Also, if these

preliminary results are adopted in our

final results of this administrative

review, we intend to revoke the

antidumping duty order with respect to

Chung Woo Rope Co., Ltd., Ssang Yong

Cable Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Sung

Jin Company, based on three years of

sales at not less than NV. See Intent to

Revoke section of this notice.

Interested parties are invited to

comment on these preliminary results.

Parties who submit case briefs in this

proceeding should provide a summary

of the arguments not to exceed five

pages and a table of statutes,

regulations, and cases cited.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sunkyu Kim, at (202) 482–2613, or John

Brinkmann, at (202) 482–5288; Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20230.