alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15







November 5, 2004



Northeast Utilities

107 Selden Street

Berlin, CT 06037

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated November 5, 2004; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-34622, 33-40156, 333-108712, 333-116725 and 333-118276 on Forms S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-63023, 333-52413, 333-63144 and 333-106008 on Forms S-8 of Northeast Utilities.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP





Hartford, Connecticut
#### Samuel Alfred RUSSELL and Floyd Jameson, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42883.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 7, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 266 So.2d 92.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2016-5044

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM166AD

8-24-92 --- 9/25/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Nuevo Energy Company:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-43329, 33-70108, 333-21063, 333-51211, 333-51217, 333-51231,
333-70780, 333-100924, 333-85470, and 333-87899)
on Form S-8, registration statements
(Nos. 333-70774, 333-16231, and 333-101247) on Form S-3,
and registration statement (No. 333-46580) on Form
S-3/A, of Nuevo Energy Company of our report dated March 5, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Nuevo Energy Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity, cash flows and comprehensive income
for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2003, and the related financial statement schedule,
which
reports appear in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Nuevo
Energy Company.

Our
report dated March 5, 2004, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company changed its method of accounting
for derivative instruments effective January 1, 2001, its method
of accounting for asset retirement obligations effective January 1,
2003, and its method of accounting for certain convertible
subordinated debentures effective December 31, 2003.



| | KPMG LLP
| | --------

Houston, Texas
March 5, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.1
 
 OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE





This Officer’s Certificate is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2010, among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as Seller, Servicer, Administrator and Custodian, Citibank, NA, as Indenture Trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as Depositor, and the BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2010-A, as Issuer (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) (all capitalized terms used herein without definition have the respective meanings specified in the Sale and Servicing Agreement).




THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:
 
 1.           I am a duly authorized officer of the Servicer;
 
 2.           I have reviewed the terms of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a detailed review of the transactions and conditions of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations there under during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011;
 
 3.           To my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, except as set forth below.


Described below are the exceptions, if any, to paragraph 3 by listing, in detail, the nature of the condition or event, the period during which it has existed and the action which the Servicer has taken, is taking, or proposes to take with respect to each such condition or event:  NONE




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereunto set my hand this 28th day of March, 2012.
 By:           BMW Financial Services NA, LLC



By:          /s/ Joachim Hensel

Name:     Joachim Hensel

Title:       Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TQ98-2-35-000]


West Texas Gas, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

December 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1997, West Texas Gas, Inc. (WTG) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective January 1, 
1998:

1st Rev Twenty-Fifth Revised Sheet No. 4

    WTG states that the tariff sheet and the accompanying explanatory 
schedules constitute its quarterly PGA filing submitted pursuant to the 
purchased gas adjustment provisions of Section 19 of the General Terms 
and Conditions of its tariff. WTG states that copies of the filing were 
served upon its customers and affected state commissions.
    Any persons desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32146 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
October 28, 2015 

Dear Mr. Abzach: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3536). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types ( i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manuals. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/12/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Charles WILCHER, Appellee.

No. 73-247.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### PAN AMERICAN BANK OF DADE COUNTY, f/k/a Bank of Dade County, Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and Advance Industrial Security, Inc., Appellees.

Nos. 76-1639, 76-1855.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 30, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 30, 1977.

John A. Murray, Miami, for appellant.

Rentz, McClellan & Haggard; Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *State v. Williams,*222 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1969); *Curry Corporation v. Greenfield,*235 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1970); *Nicholson v. Eli Lilly and Company,*285 So.2d 648 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1973); *Van Gorder v. Blank (R) Construction Corporation,*341 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1976).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, L.M. (Theo) de Kool, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

Dated: February 4, 2009



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ L.M. (Theo) de Kool,                                               
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the annual report of AJ ACQUISITION CORP. II, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bondy Ho Bong Lau, President (principal executive officer) and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: May 17, 2011
/s/ Bondy Ho Bong LauBondy Ho Bong LauPresident (principal executive officer) Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)
#### Sherwood WARREN, Sr., and Grace A. Warren, his wife, Appellants, v. Andrew DOMANICK et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 29, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; J. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2473 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2473

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 275 Penn Avenue in Salem, Ohio, as the ``Howard Arthur Tibbs Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOWARD ARTHUR TIBBS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 275 Penn Avenue in Salem, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Howard Arthur Tibbs Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Howard 
Arthur Tibbs Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2591 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2591

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that certain 
medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs have physical 
    locations for the disposal of controlled substances medications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2021

Mrs. Miller-Meeks (for herself and Mr. Trone) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that certain 
medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs have physical 
    locations for the disposal of controlled substances medications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dispose Unused Medications and 
Prescription Opioids Act'' or the ``DUMP Opioids Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 
              FACILITIES TO HAVE PHYSICAL LOCATION FOR THE DISPOSAL OF 
              CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES MEDICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure 
that each covered Department medical facility has a physical location 
where any individual may dispose of controlled substances medications.
    (b) Covered Department Medical Facility Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``covered Department medical facility'' means a medical 
facility of the Department of Veterans Affairs with an onsite pharmacy 
or a physical location dedicated for law enforcement purposes.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on January 1, 
2022.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 18

                                                             Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
              AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                (Unaudited)


<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended   
                                                        March 31,      
                                                   1997          1996  
                                                 (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                              <C>           <C>
Earnings:

  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                        $ 61,697      $ 44,235
  Interest expense (including $12,447 
    for 1997 to fund assets held for
    sale)                                         125,278       125,980 
  Implicit interest in rents                        2,822         3,092

Total earnings                                   $189,797      $173,307

Fixed charges:

  Interest expense (including $12,447 
    for 1997 to fund assets held for
    sale)                                        $125,278      $125,980 
  Implicit interest in rents                        2,822         3,092

Total fixed charges                              $128,100      $129,072


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   1.48          1.34
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
#### Paul Henry KIDD, in his capacity as Attorney for Cheryl Qualls v. Honorable David T. CALDWELL, Judge, Second Judicial District for Jackson Parish.

No. 63007.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 8, 1978.

In re: Paul Henry Kidd, applying for remedial writs and stay order. Parish of Jackson.

Granted. Further proceedings stayed pending action by this Court.
Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0006 Dir ID 2013

- NM

- 147

- AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/5/15

Regional Airline Ass ociation 1/5/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/5/15

ATA Joe White 1/5/15
Exhibit 32   Certifications   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, of American General Finance, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/Frederick W. GeissingerFrederick W. GeissingerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:May 9, 2008   45
#### John Henry DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 10, 1972.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Michael Lee Von Zamft and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of the crime of robbery. He appeals the adjudication and argues for reversal of the nine-year sentence entered pursuant to the judgment. An examination of the record demonstrates that the proof of ap*86pellant’s guilt is full and clear. On this appeal, two points are raised for our review. The first point urges an alleged error in limiting the scope of cross-examination of a witness. The second point contends that a comment upon the evidence by the prosecutor was prejudicial. It is unnecessary to discuss these points in detail because our examination of the record demonstrates that in each instance the action claimed to be error was not prejudicial, and even if found to be error would not result in a reversal. See Mankowski v. State, Fla. 1955, 83 So.2d 597.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHRISTOPHER CRAIG,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 419, 2019

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 1206022379 (N)

§ 

§ 

§

§

 Submitted: May 8, 2020

 Decided: July 29, 2020

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record below, we 

conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its August 29, 2019 order denying the 

appellant’s first motion for postconviction relief filed under Superior Court Criminal 

Rule 61 (“Rule 61”).

1 The motion was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the 

pleading requirements of Rule 61(i)(5).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. 

Justice

 

1

State v. Craig, 2019 WL 4131121 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 29, 2019).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32208]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 30, 1997, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of permit 
applications received. A permit was issued on December 3, 1997 to the 
following applicant:

Charles R. Stearns, Permit No. 98-017
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-32208 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT

| in thousands, except share and per share data                              |   | 12 Weeks Ended |       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|------------|
|                                                                       |   | May 1, 2010    |       |   | May 2, 2009 |   |
| Basic:                                                                     |   |           |       |   |   |   |
| Net income applicable to common shares                                     |   | $              | 6,540      |   |   | $ | 2,329 |   |
|                                                                       |   |           |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Shares:                                                                    |   |           |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding |   |           | 9,302,882  |   |   |   | 9,600,580 |   |
| Less: Treasury stock - weighted average                                    |   |           | (2,133,566 | ) |   |   | (2,651,781 | ) |
|                                                                       |   |           |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding |   |           | 7,169,316  |   |   |   | 6,948,799 |   |
|                                                                       |   |           |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income per common and common equivalent shares                         |   | $              | 0.91       |   |   | $ | 0.34 |   |
|                                                                       |   |           |       |   |   |   |   |   |