Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices 57081 

perform its intended function without 

unreasonable adverse effects on the 

environment; that is, without any 

unreasonable risk to man or the 

environment, or a human dietary risk 

from residues that result from the use of 

a pesticide in or on food. 

III. Registration Reviews 

A. What action is the Agency taking? 

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), 

EPA is reviewing the pesticide 

registrations for 2–EEEBC (debacarb) 

and isoxaben, to ensure that they 

continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard 

for registration—that is, that these 

pesticides can still be used without 

unreasonable adverse effects on human 

health or the environment. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is 

providing an opportunity, through this 

notice of availability, for interested 

parties to provide comments and input 

concerning the Agency’s draft human 

health and ecological risk assessments 

for 2–EEEBC (debacarb) and isoxaben. 

Such comments and input could 

address, among other things, the 

Agency’s risk assessment methodologies 

and assumptions, as applied to these 

draft risk assessments. The Agency will 

consider all comments received during 

the public comment period and make 

changes, as appropriate, to the draft 

human health and ecological risk 

assessments. EPA will then issue 

revised risk assessments, explain any 

changes to the draft risk assessments, 

and respond to comments. In the 

Federal Register notice announcing the 

availability of the revised risk 

assessments, if the revised risk 

assessments indicate risks of concern, 

the Agency may provide a comment 

period for the public to submit 

suggestions for mitigating the risk 

identified in the revised risk 

assessments. At present, EPA is 

releasing registration review draft risk 

assessments for the pesticide cases 

identified in the following table and 

further described after the table. 

TABLE 1—REGISTRATION REVIEW DRAFT RISK ASSESSMENTS

Registration review case name and 

No. Pesticide docket ID No. Chemical review manager, telephone No., and email address 

2–EEEBC (Debacarb) (Case 4031) EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0802 ........... Roy Johnson (703) 347–0492, johnson.roy@epa.gov. 

Isoxaben (Case 7219) ..................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1038 ........... Christina Scheltema, (703) 308–2201, scheltema.christina@epa.gov. 

1. 2–EEEBC (debacarb). Debacarb is a 

fungicide registered for use to control 

certain diseases in ornamental trees. 

The fungicide is applied to mature trees 

by injection through the trunk. EPA has 

completed a draft ecological risk 

assessment, including a screening-level 

listed species assessment. A human 

health risk assessment is not needed 

because the method of application 

limits the possibility for applicator or 

other human exposure. EPA 

acknowledges that further refinements 

to the listed species assessment will be 

completed in future revisions and 

requests public comment on any aspect 

of the ecological risk assessment, 

particularly any information on the 

disposition of the fungicide within the 

plant after application, the extent of use 

of the registered products, or any data 

available on adverse effects to 

potentially exposed non-target species. 

2. Isoxaben. Isoxaben is a broad 

spectrum pre-emergent herbicide used 

to control broadleaf weeds, grasses, and 

vines. Isoxaben is used around nonbearing food crops, ornamental trees, 

and shrubs in agriculture nurseries, 

rights-of-way, and urban areas. It is also 

used on bearing nut trees and grape 

vineyards. EPA has completed draft 

human health and ecological risk 

assessments, including a screening-level 

listed species assessment, for all 

isoxaben uses. EPA acknowledges that 

further refinements to the listed species 

assessment will be completed in future 

revisions and requests public comment 

on specific areas that will reduce the 

uncertainties associated with the 

characterization of risk to listed species 

identified in the current assessment. 

3. Other related information. 

Additional information on chemicals 2– 

EEEBC (debacarb) and isoxaben, is 

available for each pesticide, at http://

www.epa.gov/pesticides/chemicalsearch 

and in each chemical’s individual 

docket listed in the table in Unit III.A. 

Information on the Agency’s registration 

review program and its implementing 

regulation is available at http://

www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. 

4. Information submission 

requirements. Anyone may submit data 

or information in response to this 

document. To be considered during a 

pesticide’s registration review, the 

submitted data or information must 

meet the following requirements: 

• To ensure that EPA will consider 

data or information submitted, 

interested persons must submit the data 

or information during the comment 

period. The Agency may, at its 

discretion, consider data or information 

submitted at a later date. 

• The data or information submitted 

must be presented in a legible and 

useable form. For example, an English 

translation must accompany any 

material that is not in English and a 

written transcript must accompany any 

information submitted as an 

audiographic or videographic record. 

Written material may be submitted in 

paper or electronic form. 

• Submitters must clearly identify the 

source of any submitted data or 

information. 

• Submitters may request the Agency 

to reconsider data or information that 

the Agency rejected in a previous 

review. However, submitters must 

explain why they believe the Agency 

should reconsider the data or 

information in the pesticide’s 

registration review. 

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the 

registration review docket for each 

pesticide case will remain publicly 

accessible through the duration of the 

registration review process; that is, until 

all actions required in the final decision 

on the registration review case have 

been completed. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: September 12, 2014. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–22584 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0335; FRL–9916–40] 

Pesticide Emergency Exemptions; 

Agency Decisions and State and 

Federal Agency Crisis Declarations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: EPA has granted emergency 

exemptions under the Federal 

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 

Act (FIFRA) for use of pesticides as 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
57082 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices 

listed in this notice. The exemptions 

were granted during the period April 1, 

2014 to June 30, 2014 to control 

unforeseen pest outbreaks. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois 

Rossi, Registration Division (7505P), 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get copies of this document 

and other related information? 

The docket for this action, identified 

by docket identification (ID) number 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0335, is available 

at http://www.regulations.gov or at the 

Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 

Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Background 

EPA has granted emergency 

exemptions to the following State and 

Federal agencies. The emergency 

exemptions may take the following 

form: Crisis, public health, quarantine, 

or specific. 

Under FIFRA section 18, EPA can 

authorize the use of a pesticide when 

emergency conditions exist. 

Authorizations (commonly called 

emergency exemptions) are granted to 

State and Federal agencies and are of 

four types: 

1. A ‘‘specific exemption’’ authorizes 

use of a pesticide against specific pests 

on a limited acreage in a particular 

State. Most emergency exemptions are 

specific exemptions. 

2. ‘‘Quarantine’’ and ‘‘public health’’ 

exemptions are emergency exemptions 

issued for quarantine or public health 

purposes. These are rarely requested. 

3. A ‘‘crisis exemption’’ is initiated by 

a State or Federal agency (and is 

confirmed by EPA) when there is 

insufficient time to request and obtain 

EPA permission for use of a pesticide in 

an emergency. 

EPA may deny an emergency 

exemption: If the State or Federal 

agency cannot demonstrate that an 

emergency exists, if the use poses 

unacceptable risks to the environment, 

or if EPA cannot reach a conclusion that 

the proposed pesticide use is likely to 

result in ‘‘a reasonable certainty of no 

harm’’ to human health, including 

exposure of residues of the pesticide to 

infants and children. 

If the emergency use of the pesticide 

on a food or feed commodity would 

result in pesticide chemical residues, 

EPA establishes a time-limited tolerance 

meeting the ‘‘reasonable certainty of no 

harm standard’’ of the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

In this document: EPA identifies the 

State or Federal agency granted the 

exemption, the type of exemption, the 

pesticide authorized and the pests, the 

crop or use for which authorized, and 

the duration of the exemption. 

III. Emergency Exemptions 

A. U.S. States and Territories 

Arkansas 

State Plant Board 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 17, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Arizona 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of flutriafol on cotton to control 

cotton root rot; April 14, 2014 to June 

15, 2014. 

Delaware 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of dinotefuran on pome fruit and 

stone fruit to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; April 29, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of bifenthrin on apple, peach, 

and nectarine to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; June 20, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Florida 

Department of Agriculture and 

Consumer Services 

Crisis Exemption: On April 8, 2014, 

for use of clothianidin on young citrus 

trees to control transmission of 

Huanglongbing disease caused by Asian 

Citrus Psyllid. Florida Department of 

Agriculture and Consumer Services has 

also submitted a specific exemption 

request which allows the use to 

continue beyond the 15 days allowed 

under a crisis exemption, because the 

use is needed until November 1, 2014. 

EPA is currently evaluating that request. 

Since this use is for a neonicotinoid, 

EPA published a notice of receipt for the 

specific exemption request in the 

Federal Register on May 21, 2014 (79 

FR 29185) (FRL–9909–94) with the 

public comment period closing on May 

28, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

May 16, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of streptomycin on grapefruit to 

control citrus canker; June 12, 2014 to 

June 12, 2015. EPA authorized the use 

because available alternative controls 

are not adequate to effectively control 

this disease, since they cause phytotoxic 

effects to the citrus when used during 

higher temperatures. Significant 

economic losses are occurring without 

control of this pathogen, which has 

become a serious threat to the freshmarket grapefruit industry in Florida. 

Since this request proposed the use of 

a material also used in humans and 

animals as an antibiotic drug, a notice 

of receipt published in the Federal 

Register on May 21, 2014 (79 FR 29185) 

(FRL–9909–94) with the public 

comment period closing on May 28, 

2014. 

Georgia 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of terbufos on cotton to control 

southern root knot nematodes; May 20, 

2014 to July 1, 2014. EPA authorized the 

use because the loss of the industry 

standard tool resulted in a critical and 

urgent emergency situation and 

alternative controls were not adequate 

to effectively control this disease. Since 

this request proposed the use of an 

active ingredient which belongs to the 

organophosphate class of pesticides, a 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices 57083 

notice of receipt published in the 

Federal Register on May 21, 2014 (79 

FR 29185) (FRL–9909–94) with the 

public comment period closing on May 

28, 2014. 

Kentucky 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

May 22, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Louisiana 

Department of Agriculture and Forestry 

Quarantine Exemption: EPA 

authorized the use of fipronil as an 

expansion of the registered use, to 

control an invasive crazy ant species 

(commonly referred to as the tawny 

crazy ant) around the outside of 

manmade structures in counties where 

the ant has been confirmed; April 23, 

2014 to November 1, 2015. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 18, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of sulfoxaflor on sorghum to 

control sugarcane aphid; April 30, 2014 

to October 31, 2014. 

Maine 

Department of Agriculture, 

Conservation and Forestry 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 23, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Maryland 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 23, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of dinotefuran on pome fruit and 

stone fruit to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; April 29, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of bifenthrin on apple, peach, 

and nectarine to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; June 20, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Massachusetts 

Department of Agricultural Resources 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 17, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Michigan 

Department of Agriculture and Rural 

Development 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of dinotefuran on pome fruit and 

stone fruit to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; April 29, 2014 to 

November 30, 2014. 

Mississippi 

Department of Agriculture and 

Commerce 

Quarantine Exemption: EPA 

authorized the use of fipronil as an 

expansion of the registered use, to 

control an invasive crazy ant species 

(commonly referred to as the tawny 

crazy ant) around the outside of 

manmade structures in counties where 

the ant has been confirmed; May 22, 

2014 to November 1, 2015. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 29, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of sulfoxaflor on sorghum to 

control sugarcane aphid; June 12, 2014 

to October 31, 2014. 

Missouri 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 18, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Nebraska 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

May 16, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Nevada 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 17, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

New York 

Department of Environmental 

Conservation 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of bifenthrin on apple, peach, 

and nectarine to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; June 20, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

North Carolina 

Department of Agriculture and 

Consumer Services 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of dinotefuran on pome fruit and 

stone fruit to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; May 28, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of bifenthrin on apple, peach, 

and nectarine to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; June 20, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

North Dakota 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 17, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Ohio 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 18, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Oklahoma 

Department of Agriculture, Food, and 

Forestry 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of flutriafol on cotton to control 

cotton root rot; April 14, 2014 to June 

30, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 17, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of sulfoxaflor on sorghum to 

control sugarcane aphid; April 30, 2014 

to October 31, 2014. 

Pennsylvania 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of dinotefuran on pome fruit and 

stone fruit to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; May 28, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of bifenthrin on apple, peach, 

and nectarine to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; June 20, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

South Carolina 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of terbufos on cotton to control 

southern root knot nematodes; May 30, 

2014 to July 1, 2014. 

South Dakota 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

May 16, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
57084 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices 

Texas 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of sulfoxaflor on sorghum to 

control sugarcane aphid; April 24, 2014 

to October 31, 2014. 

Virginia 

Department of Agriculture and 

Consumer Services 

Specific Exemptions: EPA authorized 

the use of dinotefuran on pome fruit and 

stone fruit to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; April 29, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of bifenthrin on apple, peach, 

and nectarine to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; June 20, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Washington State 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of lambda-cyhalothrin on 

asparagus to control European asparagus 

aphid; May 22, 2014 to September 30, 

2014. 

West Virginia 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of potassium salt of hop beta 

acids in beehives to control varroa mite; 

April 23, 2014 to December 31, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of dinotefuran on pome fruit and 

stone fruit to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; April 29, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of bifenthrin on apple, peach, 

and nectarine to control the brown 

marmorated stinkbug; June 20, 2014 to 

October 15, 2014. 

Wyoming 

Department of Agriculture 

Specific Exemption: EPA authorized 

the use of diflubenzuron on alfalfa to 

control the Mormon cricket and 

grasshoppers; June 6, 2014 to October 

31, 2014. EPA authorized the use 

because projected levels of grasshoppers 

are very high for 2014 and the available 

alternatives are not expected to avert 

significant economic losses under 

outbreak conditions. Since this use has 

been requested for more than 5 years 

and an application for registration has 

not yet been received by EPA, a Notice 

of Receipt with opportunity for public 

comment published in the Federal 

Register, as required by 40 CFR 166.24, 

on April 30, 2014 (79 FR 24418) (FRL– 

9908–39) with public comment period 

closing on May 15, 2014. 

B. Federal Departments and Agencies 

Agriculture Department 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service 

Quarantine Exemption: EPA 

authorized a quarantine exemption to 

permit cotton growers to plant up to 

100% of cotton acreage to transgenic 

(Bt) cotton, in conjunction with sterile 

insect release, as a Pink Bollworm 

(PBW) eradication strategy, in the PBW 

eradication area in California; April 23, 

2014 to April 23, 2017. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: September 17, 2014. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–22746 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0628; FRL–9916–39] 

Registration Review Proposed Interim 

Decision; Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s proposed interim 

registration review decisions for public 

comment. Registration review is EPA’s 

periodic review of pesticide 

registrations to ensure that each 

pesticide continues to satisfy the 

statutory standard for registration, that 

is, that the pesticide can perform its 

intended function without unreasonable 

adverse effects on human health or the 

environment. Through this program, 

EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s 

registration is based on current 

scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 24, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in the table in Unit 

II.A., by one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For pesticide specific information, 

contact: The Chemical Review Manager 

for the pesticide of interest identified in 

the table in Unit II.A. 

For general information on the 

registration review program, contact: 

Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–8015; email address: 

dumas.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

worker, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

Chemical Review Manager for the 

pesticide of interest identified in the 

table in Unit II.A. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES