alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

ONYX SERVICE & SOLUTIONS, INC. 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the period  ended November 30 , 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary Passalaqua, Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mary Passalaqua and will be retained by Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 Dated: February 17, 2011

 

By: /s/ Mary Passalaqua

Mary Passalaqua

President, CEO

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

ONYX SERVICE & SOLUTIONS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Onyx Service& Solutions, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the period  ended November 30 , 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret Burton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Margaret Burton and will be retained by Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

  

 Dated: February 17, 2011

 

By: /s/ Margaret Burton

Margaret Burton

Secretary; Director; Chief Financial Officer
#### Roy Duane CARLSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, Respondent.

No. 40477.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 866,

CARLTON, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of DE Acquisition 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis Nguyen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Dennis Nguyen

Dennis Nguyen

Principal Executive Officer

May 31, 2011
#### Thomas L. CASOLA, Appellant, v. Salvatore CASOLA and Brenda Casola, his wife, Appellees.

No. 68-1063.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 23, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
LAKE COUNTY EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE

INCOME CERTIFICATION 

Form to be completed by Head of Household and signed by all adult household members if the 

household is verifying undocumented income.

Head of Household: _____________________________ Date: ___________________ 

Applicant: ______________________________ Application Number: __________ 

(for Office Use Only)

*Acknowledgement: By typing your initials or name below, you acknowledge and agree that this 

represents your signature and you are attesting to all information being provided on this form. 

1. I/ we hereby certify that I/ we individually receive income from undocumented sources:

Weekly ____________ or

Monthly ____________ or

Annually ____________ 

Source of Income

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

__________

Initials

2. I/we currently have income and there is no imminent change expected in my financial

status or employment status during the next 12 months.

__________

Initials

Under penalty of perjury, I certify that the information presented in this certification is true and accurate 

to the best of my knowledge. The undersigned further understand(s) that providing false representations 

herein constitutes an act of fraud. False, misleading, or incomplete information may result in the 

termination of and the required repayment of any and all benefits received through the Indiana 

Emergency Rental Assistance Program.

_____________________________ _____________________________ ________________

Printed Name of Applicant/Tenant *Signature of Applicant/Tenant Date 

_____________________________ _____________________________ ________________ 

Printed Name of Applicant/Tenant *Signature of Applicant/Tenant Date 

_____________________________ _____________________________ ________________ 

Printed Name of Applicant/Tenant *Signature of Applicant/Tenant Date 

_____________________________ _____________________________ ________________ 

Printed Name of Applicant/Tenant *Signature of Applicant/Tenant Date
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32016]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE: December 15, 1997.

PLACE: National Archives at College Park, MD.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Review of Assassination Records
2. Other Business

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen Sullivan, Press Officer, 
600 E Street, NW, Second Floor, Washington, DC 20530. Telephone: (202) 
724-0088; Fax: (202) 724-0457.
T. Jeremy Gunn,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-32016 Filed 12-3-97; 10:50 am]
BILLING CODE 6118-01-P
### -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.5 39.0 39.5 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/28 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
<PAGE>   1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Health Management Systems, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 15,
1996 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Health
Information Systems Corporation and Subsidiary included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K)  of Health Management Systems, Inc. for the year ended October 31,
1996 in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-13513) and Registration
Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 33-91518 and 333-06769 and  Form S-8 Nos. 33-65560,
33-33706, 33-76770, 33-76638 and 33-95326) of Health Management Systems, Inc.



New York, New York                                 Ernst & Young LLP 
January 15, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 233 (Thursday, December 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This collection has been submitted under 
the emergency Paperwork Reduction Act procedures.
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Archival Tag Recovery.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: None.
    Type of Request: New Collection--Emergency Review.
    Burden: 7 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 13
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: To investigate the migratory patterns of Atlantic 
bluefin tuna, a program has been undertaken to implant archival tags. 
In the event a fish with an archival tag is captured, applicable 
regulations could require its immediate release under certain 
conditions. In order to provide for maximum likelihood of data 
recovery, a regulation will be issued to exempt the harvest of fish 
with archival tags from other applicable requirements. Persons that 
harvest a tuna containing a tag are requested to provide certain 
information about the tuna (size, weight, location, etc.).
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20503. A clearance has been requested by December 19, 
1997.

    Dated: November 26, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 97-31778; Filed 12-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-22-P
#### STATE of Florida et al., Appellants, v. SARASOTA COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

No. 40729.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 9, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Rick Martin HEIDELBACH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 01-16750.

D.C. No. CV-00-01170-MHM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rick Martin Heidelbach appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his Arizona conviction and sentence for aggravated assault. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of a habeas corpus petition on procedural grounds, *see La Crosse v. Kernan,*244 F.3d 702, 704 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

This court granted a certificate of ap-pealability (“COA”) on the sole issue of whether certain of Heidelbach’s claims which were never presented to the Arizona state court are procedurally defaulted.1 Heidelbach fails to demonstrate cause for his default and actual prejudice, or that failure to consider the claims will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice. *See Coleman v. Thompson,*501 U.S. 722, 750, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991). Although Heidelbach also claims to be actually innocent of a felony, his petition does not meet the requirements of *Schlup v. Delo,*513 U.S. 298, 115 S.Ct. 851, 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995).

Accordingly, we conclude that the district court properly ruled that Heidel-bach’s claims are procedurally defaulted. *Id.*We decline to consider other issues raised by Heidelbach that are outside the *252scope of the COA. *See Hiivala v. Wood,*195 F.3d 1098, 1103 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. We note that *Smith v. Stewart,*241 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir.2001), the opinion specifically mentioned in the COA, was vacated by *Stewart v. Smith,*-U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2578, 153 L.Ed.2d 762 (2002), and the Supreme Court opinion makes clear that *Smith*is distinguishable from this case.
EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>

CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED
(in thousands of dollars or shares except per share amounts)
Twelve Weeks Ended July 25, 1998 and July 19, 1997

<CAPTION>
                                            Twelve Weeks Ended  
                                          ----------------------
                                           July 25,    July 19, 
                                             1998        1997   
                                          ---------    ---------
<S>                                       <C>          <C>
Diluted:
  Net earnings (loss) applicable to common
    shares                                $  1,387     $  1,385 
                                          =========    =========
Shares: 
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding               17,639       17,335 
  Shares issuable under employee
    stock plans - weighted average              31           31 
  Dilutive effect of exercise of
    certain stock options                      277          128 
  Less: Treasury stock-weighted average     (7,624)      (5,573)
                                          ---------    ---------
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding    10,323       11,921 
                                          =========    =========
Net earnings (loss) per common and
    common equivalent shares              $   0.13     $   0.12 
                                          =========    =========
</TABLE>












                              28
#### John Edward GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler and Marc E. Kirk, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

CROSS, Judge.

Appellant, John Edward Gray, was charged by information under count one with the criminal offense of burglary of a structure with the intent to commit larceny, and under count two thereof with displaying a weapon while committing or attempting to commit a felony. Appellant was convicted, adjudged guilty, and sentenced under count one for attempted burglary of a structure and under count two for dis*849playing a weapon. This appeal then followed.

Several points on appeal are raised by appellant. However, only one merits discussion, and that is needed in order to clarify dicta appearing in *Bownes v. State,*345 So.2d 787 (Fla.4th DCA 1977). In *Bownes,*the ease was reversed and remanded to the trial court for resentencing on the basis of an unnecessary restriction imposed under terms of probation. The appellant in *Bownes*was convicted of attempted burglary, and therein attempted burglary was characterized as a first degree misdemean- or. The great weight of authority, as expressed by our sister courts, recognizes that attempted burglary is a third degree felony, a view which we herein adopt. *State v. Wilcox,*351 So.2d 89 (Fla.2d DCA, Opinion filed November 2, 1977); *State ex rel. Washington v. Rivkind,*350 So.2d 575 (Fla.3d DCA, Opinion filed October 11, 1977); Massey *v. State,*348 So.2d 1244 (Fla.1st DCA 1977); Opin.Atty.Gen. 077-112 (1977).

We have considered the remaining points raised on appeal and determined them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DURANT, N. JOSEPH, JR., Associate Judge, concur.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Mabel Frances THOMPSON, Respondent.

No. 43774.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 5, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 218.

CARLTON, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ„ dissent.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of SemGroup Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman J. Szydlowski, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: June 21, 2012

 

 
|   | By:                                   | /s/ Norman J. Szydlowski |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|   | Norman J. Szydlowski                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
Health Management Systems, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (File No. 33-91518) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-65560, 33-76638, 33-76770,
33-95326, 333-33706 and 333-77121) of Health Management Systems, Inc. of our
report dated December 1, 1999, except for paragraph 1 of footnote 17 which is as
of December 20, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Health
Management Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1999 and 1998, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended October 31, 1999 and related schedule, which report appears in the
October 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of the Health Management Systems,
Inc.

                                             /s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
January 25, 2000
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-60445 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus $536,039.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant,

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MANLEY CARGILL, Claimant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:90CV226GR

- - - - - - - - - - May 7, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Manley W. Cargill, feder a l inmate #41436-004 appeals the district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to set aside a default judgment in an action for forfeiture in rem . This court reviews a district court’s decision denying such relief forNo. 96-60445 -2- abuse of discretion. Matter of Dierschke , 975 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir. 1992). Because Cargill has failed to establish standing to challenge the forfeiture of the currency, the district court did
not abuse its disc retion in denying his motion to set aside the default judgment. S ee United States v. $321,470 U.S. Currency , 874 F.2d 298, 303 (5th Cir. 1989).
AFFIRMED.
# o/a-/5 ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA # 05-09-01368-CR OFFENSE: MURDER Hall, John Edward v. TheState of 

### STYLE: Texas COUNTY: COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: DATE: 04/11/2011 Publish: NO TC CASE #:



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Hall, John Edward v. The State of STYLE: Texas CCA#: 

# OIZ-15 Pf?0 &?_ Petition 

### CCADisposition: DATE: FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# t£fi>seb JUDGE: 

# DATE: n^\w9€>l9 JUDGE: A. UvU^- SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TODD ALLEN, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 592 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 17th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      442
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,355
<PP&E>                                          37,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              746
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        134
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,376
<SALES>                                          5,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,321
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,697
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,697
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32


</TABLE>
Order entered September 29, 2021

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00333

- CR

JOSHUA RAY ARMSTRONG

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

On Appeal from the 1 5th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 071639

O RDER

Before the Court is appellant ’ s September 27 , 2021 second motion to extend

time to file his brie f. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant ’ s brief filed

no later than Oc tober 27 , 2021. If appellant ’ s brief is not filed by that date, this

appeal may be abated for th e trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of

appellate proc edure 38.8. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8( b)(2).

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE