alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,361<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,751
<PP&E>                                          22,694<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,336
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           663
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,305
<SALES>                                         24,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,332
<CGS>                                           18,375<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (105)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,130
<INCOME-TAX>                                       396
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                734
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $ .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $ .68
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation and depletion.
<F3>Exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

Pallarino, Bob

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 6:13 AM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov;

joanna.seto@doh.hawaii.gov; Linder, Steven; Pallarino, Bob; Shimabuku, June T. CIV 

NAVFAC HI, EV4; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV 

NAVFAC HI, EV4; Mizuno, Arleen M CIV NAVFAC HI, PRJ412; Whitehouse, Brian P CIV 

NAVFAC HI, OPHEV3; Lovgren, Andrew C LCDR, NAVSUP FLCPH C700

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - January 13, 2015

Hi Richard/Roxanne: 

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic 

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of January 13, 2015. In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be 

annotated. 

1. Preliminary Work Plan 

Action complete. 

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable) 

a. Action 1 - Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation 

of release point(s) within Tank 5. 

Action complete. 

b. Action 2 - The rate of vertical migration for the released JP-8 free product is unknown. Information from the 

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP-8 releases of 10,000, 

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5. 

No change. Based on discussions/meetings with EPA and DOH, the need for vertical migration modeling for the JP-8 

release is being re-evaluated. 

c. Action 3 - Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of 

the released JP-8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased 

monitoring are required to address this plume. 

Based on discussions during AOC/SOW negotiations in December 2014, the Navy is awaiting written recommendation 

from EPA/DOH on the Tank 5 Characterization Work Plan/ Sampling Plan for release investigation under the tank. 

d. Action 4 - Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future 

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete. 

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical. 

d.(1) Sentinel Wells 

Final analytical results for baseline groundwater samples from the two new wells, RHMW06 and RHMW07, was 

submitted to the DOH on December 19, 2014. 
2

d.(2) Site Characterization 

No change. See update for 2.c Action 3, above. 

d.(3) AOC/SOW 

A negotiation meeting was held on January 8, 2015. Discussions are ongoing. 

d.(4) Request for Additional Information 

No change. 

d.(5) BWS/USGS Groundwater Flow Study 

No change. 

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. 

v/r, 

Aaron
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of MEMS USA, Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  James A.  Latty and
Richard W. York,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  respectively,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that to  their
knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/
--------------------------------
James A. Latty,
Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 14, 2006

/s/
--------------------------------
Richard W. York,
Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Florida, ex rel. George CRIDLAND, Relator, v. J. F. McCRACKEN, Clerk Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-606.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Mandamus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-05-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-06-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-24-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<CASH>                                2,103
<SECURITIES>                         66,397
<RECEIVABLES>                        12,459
<ALLOWANCES>                            435
<INVENTORY>                          17,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    113,010
<PP&E>                              263,331
<DEPRECIATION>                     (154,687)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      231,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                35,514
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              7,113
<OTHER-SE>                          106,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        231,425
<SALES>                             148,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    148,891
<CGS>                                23,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       151,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                           (477)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (886)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           (886)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.09)








<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-5204.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 28, 2002.

Allen J. Litchfield, John D. Russell, Robert T. Raley, Office of the United States Attorney, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jeffrey Williams U.S.P Beaumont, Beaumont, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HENRY, and HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judges, and BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant Jeffrey Williams seeks to appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. To proceed on appeal before this court, appellant must obtain a certificate of appealability (COA), *see id.*§ 2253(c)(1)(B). Appellant sought a COA from the district court, which request was denied. Appellant reurges that motion here. A COA will not issue unless appellant makes “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” *Id.*§ 2253(c)(2). He can make this showing by demonstrating that the issues he seeks to raise are debatable among jurists of reason or deserving of further proceedings. *See Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

*444Appellant seeks to raise six issues on appeal, all based on claims of ineffective assistance of both retained and appointed counsel in representing him on federal drug-related charges. Construing appellant’s pro se pleadings liberally, see *Cummings v. Evans,*161 F.3d 610, 613 (10th Cir.1998), and after careful consideration of the proposed issues in light of applicable law, we conclude appellant has not met the standards for issuance of a COA.

Appellant’s motion for a COA is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
#### Guy Gordon McMECHEN, Appellant, v. Dorene Mae McMECHEN, Appellee.

No. 69-598.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2545 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2545

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the role of doctors 
 of podiatric medicine in the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2021

Mr. Wenstrup (for himself and Mr. Mrvan) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the role of doctors 
 of podiatric medicine in the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROLE OF DOCTORS OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE IN DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Clarification of Role.--Section 7306 of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ``a Director of 
                Podiatric Service,'';
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (10) as paragraph 
                (11); and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following 
                new paragraph:
            ``(10) A Podiatric Medical Director, who shall be a 
        qualified doctor of podiatric medicine and who shall be 
        responsible to the Under Secretary for Health for the operation 
        of the Podiatric Service.'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ``podiatric 
        medicine,'' after ``doctors of medicine,''; and
            (3) in subsection (c), by striking ``and (8)'' and 
        inserting ``(8), and (10)''.
    (b) Clarification of Pay Grade.--Section 7404 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ``, podiatrists,'' 
        after ``physicians'' ; and
            (2) in subsection (b), in the first heading of the list 
        following the colon, by striking ``PODIATRIST'' and inserting 
        ``PODIATRIST (DPM)''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.0

| (1)   | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 14, 2009      (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                           |   |   |                                                                      |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/Renato      Cataldo                         |   |   | /s/Dale      Heins                                                        |   |
| Renato      Cataldo                            |   |   | Dale      Heins                                                           |   |
| President      andChief      Executive Officer |   |   | Senior      Vice President, Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
#### William SNOW, Appellant, v. Mr. Cloyd STANDAFER and Evelyn Standafer, his wife, Appellees.

No. 74-281.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 25, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Lewis Kapner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Paul S. MILLSAP, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Larry SMALL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-56269.

D.C. No. CV-99-9821-MMM (BQR).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 20, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, and TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Paul S. Millsap appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition as time-barred. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). We reverse and remand.

Millsap was entitled to statutory tolling while his first state habeas petition was pending. *See Carey v. Saffold,*— U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2134, 2137-41, — L.Ed.2d- (2002). Tolling also applied while his second set of petitions was pending in the state courts. *See Smith v. Duncan,*297 F.3d 809, 814-15 (9th Cir. 2002). Further, it is apparent that the approximate thirty-day delays between the trial-appellate and appellate-Supreme court filings during the second set of state habeas petitions were not unreasonable. *Cf. Carey,*— U.S. at-, 122 S.Ct. at 2139-42 (remanding to Ninth Circuit for consideration of whether four and one-half month delay in filing for habeas relief in the California Supreme Court was unreasonable). Because with tolling, less than one year elapsed from the date that Mill-sap’s conviction became final to the date when he ultimately filed his federal habeas petition, the district court erred by dismissing it as untimely.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

TRACEY ELIZABETH BURKETT 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 192 DB 2015 (No. 8 RST 2016) 

Attorney Registration No. 70232 

(Montgomery County) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 15, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that TRACEY ELIZABETH BURKETT, who has been on Inactive Status, has never 

been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral 

qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 241 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 47
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 241

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2021

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 
                                 1998.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tropical Forest and Coral Reef 
Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 806(d) of the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation 
Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d(d)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraphs:
            ``(9) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2022.
            ``(10) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2023.
            ``(11) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2024.
            ``(12) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.
            ``(13) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2021.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                        Calendar No. 47

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 241

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act of 
                                 1998.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 20, 2021

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          563000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7708000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    181000
<INVENTORY>                                    3502000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15798000
<PP&E>                                        22590000
<DEPRECIATION>                                16092000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                26651000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         13192000
<BONDS>                                        8427000
<COMMON>                                        246000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5606000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  26651000
<SALES>                                       12605000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12605000
<CGS>                                         10777000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 12406000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              226000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (21000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    107000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (128000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0      
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (128000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)
        



</TABLE>