alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.3







Scorpio Tankers Inc.

9, Boulevard Charles III

Monaco 98000



March 31, 2014



Dear Sir/Madam:



Reference is made to the
annual report on Form 20-F of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the
“Annual Report”) and the registration statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-186815) (the
“Registration Statement”) and any related prospectus thereto. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement and any related prospectus of all references to our name in the Annual Report and to the use of
the statistical information supplied by us set forth in the Annual Report. We further advise the Company that our role has
been limited to the provision of such statistical data supplied by us. With respect to such statistical data, we advise you
that:



(1) we have accurately described
the information and data of the oil tanker shipping industry, subject to the availability and reliability of the data supporting
the statistical and graphical information presented; and



(2) our methodologies for collecting
information and data may differ from those of other sources and does not reflect all or even necessarily a comprehensive set of
the actual transactions occurring in the oil tanker shipping industry.



We hereby consent to the filing
of this letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement and any related
prospectus.



Yours faithfully,







Nigel Gardiner

Group Managing Director

Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd.





LONDON | DELHI
| SINGAPORE

Drewry Shipping Consultants, 15-17
Christopher Street, London EC2A 2BS, United Kingdom

t: +44 (0) 20 7538 0191 f: +44 (0) 20
7987 9396 e: enquiries@drewry.co.uk

Registered in England No. 3289135 Registered VAT No.
830 3017 77

www.drewry.co.uk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32315]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Determination of Quarterly Rate of Excise Tax for Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Annuity Program

    In accordance with directions in Section 3221(c) of the Railroad 
Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C., Section 3221(c)), the Railroad 
Retirement Board has determined that the excise tax imposed by such 
Section 3321(c) on every employer, with respect to having individuals 
in his employ, for each work-hour for which compensation is paid by 
such employer for services rendered to him during the quarter beginning 
January 1, 1998, shall be at the rate of 35 cents.
    In accordance with directions in Section 15(a) of the Railroad 
Retirement Act of 1974, the Railroad Retirement Board has determined 
that for the quarter beginning January 1, 1998, 31.6 percent of the 
taxes collected under Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) of the Railroad 
Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad Retirement Account 
and 68.4 percent of the taxes collected under such Sections 3211(b) and 
3221(c) plus 100 percent of the taxes collected under Section 3221(d) 
of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Account.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.

    By Authority of the Board.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32315 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65257-65258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32384]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-82-000]


Gas Transport, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

December 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1997, Gas Transport, Inc. (GTI) 
tendered for filing revised tariff sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, with a proposed effective date of January 
1, 1998.
    GTI states that the purpose of this filing is to conform GTI's 
tariff to the requirements set forth in Subpart C of Part 154 of the 
Commission's Regulations and Order No. 582.

[[Page 65258]]

Specifically, GTI is: (1) Submitting a title page; (2) revising the 
Table of Contents to include a brief description of each service; (3) 
updating the preliminary statement; (4) adding a new General Terms and 
Conditions (``GT&C'') Section 25 entitled ``Order of Discounts''; (5) 
adding a new GT&C Section 26 entitled ``Policy With Respect to Fees and 
Construction of New Facilities''; (6) eliminating the index of 
customers; and (7) removing the ``Qualification for Service'' section 
from the EFT, FT, and IT Rate Schedules and placing it in the GT&C as 
Section 24 thereof.
    GTI states that copies of this filing were served upon its firm 
customers and interested state commissions. Copies were also served on 
all interruptible customers as of the date of the filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32384 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     UT

<LEGEND>                      The schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from Consolidated
                              Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Statement of
                              Cash Flows for Orange and Rockland Utilities,
                              Inc. and is qualified in its entirety
                              by reference to such financial statements
                              and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000074778
<NAME> Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                        Jun-30-2000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                        Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           703,097

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>         3,412

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              199,888

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            182,437

<OTHER-ASSETS>                        0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1,088,834

<COMMON>                            5

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           194,499

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 135,080

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      329,584

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0

<PREFERRED>                            0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                335,601

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                     0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>              0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>         0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>       20,000

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>              0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>            0

<LEASES-CURRENT>                       0

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      403,649

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>       1,088,834

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           325,835

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                7,801

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          292,176

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          299,977

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             25,858

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                  2,907

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      28,765

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>            12,721

<NET-INCOME>                        16,044

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            0

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       16,044

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>               0

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>           11,670

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              16,971

<EPS-BASIC>                            0

<EPS-DILUTED>                          0


</TABLE>
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                               Twelve Months Ended
                             (Thousands of Dollars)


                                                    JUNE                 JUNE
                                                    1999                 1998
                                               ----------           ---------


Earnings
 Net Income                                      $756,826             $744,955
 Federal Income Tax                               726,998              462,018
 Federal Income Tax Deferred                     (279,314)             (60,780)
 Investment Tax Credits Deferred                   (8,594)              (8,770)
                                               ----------           ----------

    Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax    1,195,916            1,137,423

Fixed Charges*                                    338,556              355,319
                                               ----------           ----------

    Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax
      and Fixed Charges                        $1,534,472           $1,492,742
                                               ==========           ==========



* Fixed Charges

 Interest on Long-Term Debt                      $290,520             $303,379
 Amort. of Debt Discount, Premium & Expense        13,771               12,878
 Interest on Component of Rentals                  18,283               18,367
 Other Interest                                    15,982               20,695
                                               ----------           ----------

    Total Fixed Charges                          $338,556             $355,319
                                               ==========           ==========



    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges               4.53                 4.20
#### Harvey H. WITCHER v. HANCOCK TEXTILE CO. et al.

No. 46935.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 18, 1972.

Parker, Randle & Winston, P. A., Tupelo, for appellant.

Mitchell, McNutt & Bush, Wade H. Lagrone, Tupelo, for appellees.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and RODGERS, INZER, ROBERTSON and BROOM, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; L. T. Senter, Jr., Judge.

Affirmed.
#### William Beason MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-663.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 14, 1973.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, Bradenton, and William Beason Morrison, in pro. per. for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PIERCE, Judge (Ret.).

Appellant William Beason Morrison was tried and convicted in the Polk County Criminal Court of Record of the offense of second degree murder, and was thereupon sentenced to serve a term in the state prison. Almost three years later he filed in the trial court a motion to vacate said judgment and sentence, which motion was denied. He has appealed such denial to this court, and the public defender, appointed to represent Morrison on this appeal, has filed brief in this court in his behalf.

Motion for post-conviction relief raised generally two points, (1) that he was denied a “speedy trial,” and (2) he had the ineffective assistance of counsel.

As to the “speedy trial” contention, such matter could have been raised on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction, and having failed so to do, the contention may not now be urged.

As to the other point, that his counsel was ineffective, there is no allegation as to what the ineffectiveness consisted of. A “conflicting interest” was mentioned, but the Court is not advised as to what that conflict was. He complains that his counsel failed to call some “extremely valuable” witnesses and failed to ask certain “pertinent questions” of the witnesses at the trial, but as to who the valuable witnesses were is not stated; likewise the pertinent questions that could have been asked. It is settled law in this state that a post-conviction motion for relief must allege factual matters and not conclusions.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel. As this court stated in Bankston v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 326:

> “Success is not the measure of counsel’s effectiveness, and mere errors of judgment as disclosed by subsequent events are not sufficient to establish in*138effective assistance of counsel; United States v. Hammonds, (1970), 138 U.S.App.D.C. 166, 425 F.2d 597; United States v. Rosebar, 1972, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 164, 463 F.2d 1255. The appropriate standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is whether gross incompetence blotted out the essence of a substantial defense; Bruce v. United States, 1967, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 336, 379 F.2d 113; Scott v. United States, 1970, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 339, 427 F.2d 609.”

For the foregoing reasons, among others, the order denying post-conviction relief was without error, and the same is hereby

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to
the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Lauren P. Silvernail,
Chief Financial Officer of Revance Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the Annual Report), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2,fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 28th day of March, 2014.



| |  |                         
| |  | ------------------------
| |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail
| |  | Lauren P. Silvernail    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Revance Therapeutics, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Sup reme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Cle rk February 24, 20 09

d0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

136498(26)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 136498

COA: 283134

Macomb CC: 2002

- 003704

- FC

DAVID ALAN BUTLER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of th e Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 27,

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors


Citibank, N.A.:




We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 is fairly stated, in all material respects.









/s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois


February 26, 2010
```

[Federal Register: May 19, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 96)]
[Notices]               
[Page 28021-28022]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19my10-58]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

 
Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $400 million long-
term

[[Page 28022]]

guarantee to support the export of approximately $450 million worth of 
mining equipment and services to Mexico. The U.S. exports will enable 
the Mexican company to produce, on average, 50,900 metric tons of 
copper, 1,500 metric tons of cobalt, and 25,200 metric tons of zinc 
sulfate monohydrate (ZSM) per year during the 12-year repayment term of 
the guarantee. Available information indicates that new Mexican 
production of copper and cobalt will be sold in South Korea and 
international markets. New Mexican production of ZSM will be sold in 
the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. Interested parties may submit 
comments on this transaction by e-mail to economic.impact@exim.gov or 
by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Room 947, Washington, DC 20571, 
within 14 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Jonathan J. Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-11954 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 234 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 234

To amend title 38, United States Code, to treat certain individuals who 
 served in Vietnam as a member of the armed forces of the Republic of 
    Korea as a veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States for 
purposes of the provision of health care by the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2021

  Mr. Takano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to treat certain individuals who 
 served in Vietnam as a member of the armed forces of the Republic of 
    Korea as a veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States for 
purposes of the provision of health care by the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Korean American Vietnam Allies Long 
Overdue for Relief Act'' or the ``Korean American VALOR Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS WHO 
              SERVED IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA.

    Section 109 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d)(1) Any person described in paragraph (2) shall be entitled to 
hospital and domiciliary care and medical services within the United 
States under chapter 17 of this title to the same extent as if the 
service described in such paragraph had been performed in the Armed 
Forces of the United States.
    ``(2) A person described in this paragraph is a person whom the 
Secretary determines meets the following criteria:
            ``(A) The person served in Vietnam as a member of the armed 
        forces of the Republic of Korea at any time during the period 
        beginning on January 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975, or 
        such other period as determined appropriate by the Secretary 
        for purposes of this subsection.
            ``(B) The person became a citizen of the United States on 
        or after the date on which such service in the armed forces of 
        the Republic of Korea ended.''.
                                 <all>
```