27480 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

later than June 1 of the year in which 

the fee applies; and (4) in establishing 

the amount of fees under this section, 

the Secretary shall consult with 

representatives of the United States 

cotton industry. At pages 313–314, the 

Joint Explanatory Statement of the 

committee of conference for section 

14201 stated the expectation that the 

cotton classification fee would be 

established in the same manner as was 

applied during the 1992 through 2007 

fiscal years. Specifically, it states that 

the classification fee should continue to 

be a basic, uniform fee per bale as 

determined necessary to maintain costeffective cotton classification service. 

Further, in consulting with the cotton 

industry, the Secretary should 

demonstrate the level of fees necessary 

to maintain effective cotton 

classification services and provide the 

Department of Agriculture with an 

adequate operating reserve, while also 

working to limit adjustments in the 

year-to-year fee. 

Under the provisions the Cotton 

Statistics and Estimates Act as amended 

by the section 14201 of the 2008 Farm 

Bill, a user fee (dollar amount per bale 

classed) is established for the 2014 

cotton crop that, when combined with 

other sources of revenue, will result in 

projected revenues sufficient to 

reasonably cover budgeted costs— 

adjusted for inflation—and allow for 

adequate operating reserves to be 

maintained. Costs considered in this 

method include salaries, costs of 

equipment and supplies, and other 

overhead costs, such as facility costs 

and costs for administration and 

supervision. In addition to covering 

expected costs, the user fee is set such 

that projected revenues will generate an 

operating reserve adequate to effectively 

manage uncertainties related to crop 

size and cash-flow timing. Furthermore, 

the operating reserve is expected to 

meet minimum reserve requirements set 

by the Agricultural Marketing Service, 

which require maintenance of a reserve 

fund amount equal to at least four 

months of projected operating costs. 

The user fee charged cotton producers 

for cotton classification in 2014 is $2.20 

per bale, which is the same fee charged 

for the 2013 crop. This fee is based on 

the preseason projection that 13,400,000 

bales will be classed by the United 

States Department of Agriculture during 

the 2014 crop year. 

Accordingly, § 28.909, paragraph (b) 

reflects the continuation of the cotton 

classification fee at $2.20 per bale. 

As provided for in the 1987 Act, a 5 

cent per bale discount continues to be 

applied to voluntary centralized billing 

and collecting agents as specified in 

§ 28.909(c). 

Growers or their designated agents 

receiving classification data continue to 

incur no additional fees if classification 

data is requested only once. The fee for 

each additional retrieval of 

classification data in § 28.910 remains at 

5 cents per bale. The fee in § 28.910 (b) 

for an owner receiving classification 

data from the National Database remains 

at 5 cents per bale, and the minimum 

charge of $5.00 for services provided per 

monthly billing period remains the 

same. The provisions of § 28.910 (c) 

concerning the fee for new classification 

memoranda issued from the National 

Database for the business convenience 

of an owner without reclassification of 

the cotton remains the same at 15 cents 

per bale or a minimum of $5.00 per 

sheet. 

The fee for review classification in 

§ 28.911 is maintained at $2.20 per bale. 

The fee for returning samples after 

classification in § 28.911 remains at 50 

cents per sample. 

Summary of Comments 

A proposed rule was published in the 

Federal Register on April 1, 2014, with 

a comment period of April 1, 2014 

through April 16, 2014 (79 FR 18211). 

AMS received two comments. One 

comment was from a national trade 

organization that represents 

approximately 80 percent of the US 

cotton industry, including cotton 

producers, ginners, warehousemen, 

merchants, cooperatives, cottonseed 

processors, and textile manufacturers 

from Virginia to California. The other 

comment was from a national trade 

organization comprised of eight state 

and regional membership organizations 

that represent approximately 680 

individual cotton ginning operations in 

17 cotton-producing states. Comments 

from both national trade organizations 

expressed support for the decision to 

maintain the fee at the level established 

for the 2013 crop. Comments may be 

viewed at www.regulations.gov. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 28 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Cotton, Reporting and record 

keeping requirements, Warehouses. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 28 is amended as 

follows: 

PART 28—[Amended] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 28, Subpart D, continues to read as 

follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 471–476. 

■ 2. In § 28.909, paragraph (b) is revised 

to read as follows: 

§ 28.909 Costs. 

* * * * * 

(b) The cost of High Volume 

Instrument (HVI) cotton classification 

service to producers is $2.20 per bale. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. In § 28.911, the last sentence of 

paragraph (a) is revised to read as 

follows: 

§ 28.911 Review classification. 

(a) * * * The fee for review 

classification is $2.20 per bale. 

* * * * * 

Dated: May 7, 2014. 

Rex A. Barnes, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10962 Filed 5–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0869; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–063–AD; Amendment 

39–17845; AD 2014–09–10] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 767 

airplanes. This AD was prompted by 

reports of bearing damage at certain 

trailing edge (TE) flap support rib 

assemblies. This AD requires inspecting 

certain TE flap support rib assemblies to 

determine if the bearings have a roller 

retention feature, and performing 

corrective actions if necessary; and 

inspecting for bearing damage of each 

pair of removed bearings, and 

performing related investigative and 

corrective actions if necessary. We are 

issuing this AD to detect and correct 

damage to the TE flap support bearings, 

which could ultimately result in loss of 

controllability of the airplane. 

DATES: This AD is effective June 18, 

2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in this AD 

as of June 18, 2014. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 27481 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0869; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6577; 

fax: 425–917–6590; email: 

Berhane.Alazar@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain The Boeing Company 

Model 767 airplanes. The NPRM 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 7, 2013 (78 FR 66859). The 

NPRM was prompted by reports of 

bearing damage at certain TE flap 

support rib assemblies. The NPRM 

proposed to require inspecting certain 

TE flap support rib assemblies to 

determine if the bearings have a roller 

retention feature, and performing 

corrective actions if necessary; and 

inspecting for bearing damage of each 

pair of removed bearings, and 

performing related investigative and 

corrective actions if necessary. We are 

issuing this AD to detect and correct 

damage to the TE flap support bearings, 

which can result in damage to the TE 

rotary actuators and consequent dual 

flap drive system disconnect in both TE 

flap rotary actuators, and a possible flap 

aerodynamic blowback with loss of 

controllability of the airplane. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the proposal (78 FR 66859, 

November 7, 2013) and the FAA’s 

response to each comment. 

Support for the NPRM (78 FR 66859, 

November 7, 2013) 

Boeing stated that it concurs with the 

contents of the NPRM (78 FR 66859, 

November 7, 2013). 

Statement Regarding the NPRM (78 FR 

66859, November 7, 2013) 

United Airlines stated that it has 

reviewed the NPRM (78 FR 66859, 

November 7, 2013), and has no 

comment to submit. 

Statement Regarding the Installation of 

Winglets 

Aviation Partners Boeing (APB) stated 

that the installation of winglets per APB 

Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) 

ST01920SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/

Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/

rgstc.nsf/0/

59027f43b9a7486e86257b1d006591ee/

$FILE/ST01920SE.pdf) does not affect 

the accomplishment of the 

manufacturer’s service instructions. 

We agree with APB’s statement that 

the installation of winglets as specified 

in APB STC ST01219SE (http://

rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_

Library/rgstc.nsf/0/

59027f43b9a7486e86257b1d006591ee/

$FILE/ST01920SE.pdf) does not affect 

accomplishment of the requirements of 

this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on 

which APB STC ST01920SE is installed, 

a ‘‘change in product’’ alternative 

method of compliance (AMOC) 

approval request is not necessary to 

comply with the requirements of section 

39.17 of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 CFR 39.17). We have 

redesignated paragraph (c) as paragraph 

(c)(1) of this final rule, and added 

paragraph (c)(2) to this final rule to state 

that installation of STC ST01219SE does 

not affect the ability to accomplish the 

actions required by this final rule. 

Request for Clarification of Trailing 

Edge Flap Support Re-Identification 

ANA requested that we clarify 

whether the re-identification of the 

trailing edge flap support, as described 

in Part 3 of the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–27A0227, dated February 

12, 2013, for Groups 1 and 3, 

Configuration 1, airplanes, would be 

required by the NPRM (78 FR 66859, 

November 7, 2013). 

We agree to clarify. This final rule 

does require part re-identification for 

Groups 1 and 3, Configuration 1 

airplanes, as identified in Part 3 of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 767–27A0227, 

dated February 12, 2013. This part reidentification is for parts configuration 

control purposes. We have not changed 

this final rule in this regard. 

Request for Credit for Previous Actions 

All Nippon Airways (ANA) requested 

that we provide credit for the actions 

specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of the 

NPRM (78 FR 66859, November 7, 

2013), if, before the effective date of the 

AD, airplane records were used to verify 

and determine that the bearings have a 

roller retention feature installed using 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

27A0222, dated June 24, 2010. 

We partially agree with the 

commenter’s request. Verifying through 

airplane records and determining that 

the bearings have a roller retention 

feature meets the intent of this final 

rule. Therefore, we have revised 

paragraph (g) of this final rule to allow 

for a review of airplane maintenance 

records in lieu of the roller retention 

feature inspection if it can be 

conclusively determined from that 

review that each affected bearing has a 

roller retention feature. 

However, paragraph (j) of this final 

rule already provides credit for the 

actions specified in paragraphs (g) and 

(h) of this final rule, if those actions 

were performed before the effective date 

of this final rule using Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–27A0222, dated 

June 24, 2010. Therefore, no further 

change to this final rule is necessary in 

this regard. 

Additional Change Made to This Final 

Rule 

We have revised the heading for 

paragraph (j) of this final rule. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

with the changes described and minor 

editorial changes. We have determined 

that these minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 

66859, November 7, 2013) for correcting 

the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
27482 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 66859, 

November 7, 2013). 

We also determined that these 

changes will not increase the economic 

burden on any operator or increase the 

scope of this AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 45 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspection ...................................... Up to 40 work-hours × $85 per 

hour = Up to $3,400.

$0 Up to $3,400 ................................. Up to $153,000. 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary replacements that would 

be required based on the results of the 

inspection. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need these replacements: 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product 

Bearing replacement and functional test Up to 24 work-hours × $85 per hour = 

Up to $2,040.

Up to $5,936 .......................................... Up to $7,976. 

According to the manufacturer, some 

of the costs of this AD may be covered 

under warranty, thereby reducing the 

cost impact on affected individuals. We 

do not control warranty coverage for 

affected individuals. As a result, we 

have included all costs in our cost 

estimate. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2014–09–10 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–17845; Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0869; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–063–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective June 18, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

(1) This AD applies to The Boeing 

Company Model 767–200, –300, –300F, and 

–400ER series airplanes, certificated in any 

category, as identified in Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–27A0227, dated 

February 12, 2013. 

(2) Installation of Aviation Partners Boeing 

(APB) Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) 

ST01920SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_

and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/

59027f43b9a7486e86257b1d006591ee/$FILE/

ST01920SE.pdf) does not affect the ability to 

accomplish the actions required by this AD. 

Therefore, for airplanes on which APB STC 

ST01920SE is installed, a ‘‘change in 

product’’ alternative method of compliance 

(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to 

comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 

39.17. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 27, Flight controls. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports of 

bearing damage at certain trailing edge (TE) 

flap support rib assemblies. We are issuing 

this AD to detect and correct damage to the 

TE flap support bearings, which could result 

in damage to the TE rotary actuators and 

consequent dual flap drive system disconnect 

in both TE flap rotary actuators, and a 

possible flap aerodynamic blowback with 

loss of controllability of the airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 27483 

(g) Inspection of Bearings To Determine 

Roller Retention Feature, and Corrective 

Actions 

Except as provided by paragraph (i) of this 

AD, at the applicable time specified in 

paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 767–27A0227, dated 

February 12, 2013: Do a general visual 

inspection of both bearings at the TE flap 

support rib assembly in flap positions 1, 2, 

7, and 8 to determine if the bearings have a 

roller retention feature; and do all applicable 

corrective actions; in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–27A0227, dated 

February 12, 2013. Do all applicable 

corrective actions before further flight. A 

review of airplane maintenance records is 

acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the 

roller retention feature of each affected 

bearing can be conclusively determined from 

that review. 

(h) Inspection of Bearings for Damage, 

Related Investigative Actions, and 

Corrective Actions 

For each pair of bearings removed as 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD: At the 

applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–27A0227, dated February 12, 

2013, do a general visual inspection for 

damage of the bearings, and do all applicable 

related investigative and corrective actions, 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–27A0227, dated February 12, 2013. Do 

all applicable related investigative and 

corrective actions before further flight. 

(i) Exception to Compliance Time 

Where paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–27A0227, 

dated February 12, 2013, specifies a 

compliance time ‘‘after the original issue date 

of this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires 

compliance within the specified compliance 

time ‘‘after the effective date of this AD.’’ 

(j) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of 

this AD, if those actions were performed 

before the effective date of this AD using 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–27A0222, 

dated June 24, 2010, which is not 

incorporated by reference in this AD. 

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(l) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle 

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–917–6577; fax: 425–917–6590; 

email: Berhane.Alazar@faa.gov. 

(2) Service information identified in this 

AD that is not incorporated by reference may 

be viewed at the addresses specified in 

paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD. 

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

27A0227, dated February 12, 2013. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For Boeing service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & 

Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 

2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 

206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766– 

5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 24, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–09953 Filed 5–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0602; Directorate 

Identifier 2012–CE–010–AD; Amendment 

39–17848; AD 2014–10–01] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Vulcanair 

S.p.A. Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are superseding 

airworthiness directive (AD) 2008–24– 

11 for Vulcanair S.p.A. Model P68 

airplanes. This AD results from 

mandatory continuing airworthiness 

information (MCAI) originated by an 

aviation authority of another country to 

identify and correct an unsafe condition 

on an aviation product. The MCAI 

describes the unsafe condition as 

cracking and/or corrosion of the wing 

spar. We are issuing this AD to require 

actions to address the unsafe condition 

on these products. 

DATES: This AD is effective June 18, 

2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in the AD 

as of June 18, 2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain other publications listed in 

this AD as of January 2, 2009 (73 FR 

72314, November 28, 2008). 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating it in Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0602; or in person at Document 

Management Facility, U.S. Department 

of Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Vulcanair 

Airworthiness Office, Via G Pascoli, 7, 

80026 Casoria, Italy; phone: +39 081 59 

18 135; fax: +39 081 59 18 172; email: 

airworthiness@vulcanair.com; Internet: 

http://www.vulcanair.com/pageview.php?pagename=Service Bulletins. 

You may review copies of the 

referenced service information at the 

FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 

Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call (816) 329– 

4148. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES