alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(f) 

_J 

<( 

Lu 

~;-

0 

-;;-- ...:.l 

"'= 

0' 

N ~ 

"" cc 

L..L1 ! 

::£: r l ...:: ·-

f'--.: CAUSE NO. 12-00021 (Y') ,---

~::IN THE INTEREST OF ""' <J 

=.-:_· ,:-.r 

~ ALEXIA ANBTBU TRAN 

ACIIILD 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

255tJa JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

After due consideration, the Court finds that the summary judgment signed on 

March 5, 2013, was erroneous in that it did not comport with the applicable statute of 

limitations. The Court finds as such in accordance with a writ of mandamus to that effect 

issued by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas on August 2, 2013. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the Court that the motion of Respondent to 

vacate the judgment is granted and that the judgment that was signed on March 5, 2013, 

is hereby vacated in its entirety. 

Signed this---""''-~~---- day of_ .......... ""kf/~-F--=-------J' 2oL$ 

DF-1!-000!1 

OVACJ 

ORDER - VACATE JUDGMENT 

!81138 

.1111111111111111111111111
ABIE WOLF,

Appellant, 

v.

GARRY AND BONNIE STARR,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00236-CV

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012DCV5225)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that 

part of the judgment as to the issue of future mental anguish and loss of use damages. We therefore 

reverse that part of the judgment of the court below and render judgment in the amount of zero.

We further find that there was error in the part of the judgment as to the award of actual 

damages. We therefore order that the judgment be reformed to reflect the award of actual damages 

of $54,565.15. The remainder of the judgment, as reformed, is affirmed.

It is the further order that Appellant and Appellees each pay one-half (1/2) the costs of this 

appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J, and Yanez, Ret. Senior Justice

Yanez, Ret. Senior Justice (Sitting by Assignment)
#### Betty L. HOWARD, Appellant, v. Keith J. HOWARD, Appellee.

No. 71-731.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 10, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2269 

To modify the presumption of service connection for veterans who were 

exposed to herbicide agents while serving in the Armed Forces in Thailand during the Vietnam era, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2021 

Mr. WESTERMAN (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mrs. 

HARSHBARGER, Mrs. AXNE, Mr. MCCAUL, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. VEASEY, 

Mr. RYAN, Mr. STANTON, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. TURNER, Mr. BERGMAN, 

Mr. MOULTON, Mr. HILL, Mr. RUSH, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Ms. OMAR, Mr. COHEN, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. VELA, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. GONZALEZ of Ohio, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mrs. DEMINGS, Mrs. RODGERS

of Washington, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. HARDER of California, Mr. JOHNSON

of Louisiana, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. POSEY, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. KIND, and Mrs. KIRKPATRICK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To modify the presumption of service connection for veterans 

who were exposed to herbicide agents while serving in 

the Armed Forces in Thailand during the Vietnam era, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2269 IH

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE 

2 CONNECTION FOR VETERANS WHO WERE EX3 POSED TO HERBICIDE AGENTS WHILE SERV4 ING IN THE ARMED FORCES IN THAILAND 

5 DURING THE VIETNAM ERA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

7 shall ensure that if the Secretary creates a presumption 

8 of service connection between the occurrence of a disease 

9 and exposure to a herbicide agent while serving in the 

10 Armed Forces during the covered period at a military base 

11 in Thailand, such presumption also applies to exposure to 

12 a herbicide agent while serving in the Armed Forces dur13 ing the covered period at any military base located in 

14 Thailand without regard to where on the base the veteran 

15 was located or what military job specialty the veteran per16 formed. 

17 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

18 (1) COVERED PERIOD.—The term ‘‘covered pe19 riod’’ means the period beginning on January 9, 

20 1962, and ending on June 30, 1976. 

21 (2) HERBICIDE AGENT.—The term ‘‘herbicide 

22 agent’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

23 1116(a) of title 38, United States Code. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2269 IH

1 (3) VETERAN.—The term ‘‘veteran’’ has the 

2 meaning given such term in section 101 of title 38, 

3 United States Code. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 213 

To modify the minimum allocation requirement for the emergency solutions 

grants program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2021 

Mr. SIRES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To modify the minimum allocation requirement for the 

emergency solutions grants program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Solutions to End 

5 Homelessness Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM ALLOCATION REQUIREMENT FOR EMER7 GENCY SOLUTIONS GRANTS PROGRAM. 

8 Section 414(b) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless As9 sistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11373(b)) is amended to read as 

10 follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 213 IH

1 ‘‘(b) MINIMUM ALLOCATION REQUIREMENT.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If, under the allocation 

3 provisions applicable under this subtitle, a metropoli4 tan city or an urban county would receive a grant 

5 of less than .05 percent of the amounts appropriated 

6 under section 408 and made available to carry out 

7 this subtitle for any fiscal year, such amount shall 

8 be reallocated to the State in which the metropolitan 

9 city or urban county, as applicable, is located, except 

10 that— 

11 ‘‘(A) in the case of the metropolitan city, 

12 such amount shall be reallocated to the urban 

13 county in which the metropolitan city is located, 

14 if the urban county— 

15 ‘‘(i) has previously received and ad16 ministered assistance under this section; 

17 and 

18 ‘‘(ii) agrees to receive such amount; 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(B) in the case of the urban county, such 

21 amount shall be provided to the urban county 

22 if the urban county has previously received and 

23 administered assistance under this section. 

24 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding paragraph 

25 (1), a metropolitan city shall receive the grant 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 213 IH

1 amount described such paragraph if the metropoli2 tan city— 

3 ‘‘(A) is located in a State that does not 

4 have counties as local governments; 

5 ‘‘(B) has a population greater than 40,000 

6 but less than 50,000 as used in determining the 

7 fiscal year 1987 community development block 

8 grant program allocation; and 

9 ‘‘(C) was allocated in excess of $1,000,000 

10 in community development block grant funds in 

11 fiscal year 1987. 

12 ‘‘(3) AMOUNTS REALLOCATED TO URBAN COUN13 TIES.—An urban county that receives amounts re14 allocated under paragraph (1)(A) shall expend those 

15 amounts for the benefit of metropolitan cities lo16 cated in the urban county.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Arkansas

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Arkansas over 

$362 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Commercial Bancshares, Inc. Texarkana MDI $ 6,000,000 

Helena Bancshares, Inc. Helena CDFI $ 54,338,000 

Southeast Arkansas Bank Corporation Lake Village CDFI $ 32,599,000 

Southeast Financial Bankstock Corporation McGehee CDFI $ 20,000,000 

Southern Bancorp, Inc. Arkadelphia CDFI $ 250,000,000

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
Exhibit 32.1

                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned is the CEO and President of Earn-A-Car, Inc. This Certification
is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Earn-ACar, Inc. for
the year ended February 29, 2012.

The undersigned certifies that such report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Earn-A-Car, Inc. as of
February 29, 2012.

This Certification is executed as of June 13, 2012.


                                           /s/ John Storey
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           John Storey
                                           CEO and President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2094
USMV RIGHTS OF MAN, Thales Biddle Davidson, Master, Plaintiff - Appellant, and PETER M. DAVIDSON, Mate; JOHN D. WILLARD, the Vessel’s Owners; ALBERT B. HOUSE; ANDREW J. KAELIN, Plaintiffs,
versus CITY OF ANNAPOLIS, Defendant - Appellee, and EDWARD C. HARTMAN, II; CHESAPEAKE CHARTERS; PORT OF ANNAPOLIS; THE STATE OF MARYLAND; CHESAPEAKE MARINE TOURS AND CHARTERS;ANNAPOLIS BOAT SHOWS, INCORPORATED; THE BALTIMORE SUN; CAPITAL GAZETTE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED; PAUL GOETZKE; JOHN C. PATMORE; EILEEN FOGARTY; RUSSELL MORGAN; TERESA DE GRAFF; WAYNE TURNER; SHEPARD TULLIER; LOUISE HAMMOND; EMORY HARRISON; F. WILLIAM SIELING, III; MARYLAND WATERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, Defendants.2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-3354-Y) Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: May 25, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thales Biddle Davidson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices ofappeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).The district court entered its order on May 20, 1998; Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on July 20, 1998, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 16, 2013

Ms. Kateri Callahan President, Alliance to Save Energy 1850 M StreetNW Washington, DC 20036

Dear Ms. Callahan: Thank you for yourJuly 26, 2013, letter to the U

.S. Department ofEnergy (DOE) regarding DOE's participation in the development ofthe 2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). We appreciate efforts by the Alliance to Save Energy and its partners to help achieve the collective 30% energy savings goal in the current IECe. TheDepartment looks forward to continuingto participate in IECC development by submitting cost-effective code amendments that result in increased energy efficiency and help the code be more easily understood, applied, and enforced. DOE's participation in the industry process for the review and modification ofbuilding codes is guided by Title III ofthe Energy Conservation and Production Act, as amended. The Act specifies that DOE shall "seekadoption ofall technologically feasible and economicallyjustified energy efficiency measures." DOE is committed to pursue and support such measures. As part ofpursuing these measures, DOE provided an opportunity for the public to commenton its efficiency concepts and draft proposals for the 2015 IECC, which included the topic ofadding residential equipmenttradeoffs back into the code. Ofthe draft proposals, DOE selected a subsetto analyze and put forward at the 2015 International Code ConferencePublic Comment Hearings that had positive feedback from stakeholders regarding the energy efficiency savings. DOE received diverse opinions on the net energy savings from the equipmenttradeoff's proposal and thus did not include it among those selected. Regarding the Department's participation in the upcoming ICC Public Comment Hearings, DOE does intend to provide the maximum representation permitted (12 staff) and to exercise its voting privileges in a manner consistentwith the Council's rules and procedures. The Departmentvalues your support and looks forward to working with the Alliance to Save Energy to create and implement more energy-efficient building energy codes and standards. Ifyou have additional questions, please contactJeremiah Williams, Building Technologies Office, at (202) 287-1941. Sincerely,

# C/U6~ Kathleen B. Hogan Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency EnergyEfficiency and Renewable Energy 

# *

Printed wit )"! soy ink on r ecycled papel
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2213 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2213

 To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to vehicle weight 
   limitations for certain logging vehicles, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

Mr. Gallagher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to vehicle weight 
   limitations for certain logging vehicles, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Routes Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. VEHICLE WEIGHT EXEMPTIONS.

    Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(v) Certain Logging Vehicles.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall waive, with respect 
        to a covered logging vehicle, the application of any vehicle 
        weight limit established under this section.
            ``(2) Covered logging vehicle defined.--In this subsection, 
        the term `covered logging vehicle' means a vehicle that--
                    ``(A) is transporting raw or unfinished forest 
                products, including logs, pulpwood, biomass, or wood 
                chips;
                    ``(B) is traveling a distance not greater than 150 
                air miles on the Interstate from origin to a storage or 
                processing facility; and
                    ``(C) meets State legal weight tolerances and 
                vehicle configurations for transporting raw or 
                unfinished forest products within the State boundaries 
                in which the vehicle is operating.
            ``(3) Application of weight tolerances.--The waiver in this 
        subsection shall only apply with respect to a State legal 
        weight tolerance in effect on the date of enactment of this 
        subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K of DynaVox Inc. (the "Company") for the
fiscal year ended July 2, 2010, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward L. Donnelly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
September 30, 2010

/s/ EDWARD L. DONNELLY Edward L. Donnelly Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Freeze Tag, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mick Donahoo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  March 31, 2011

/s/ Mick DonahooBy:
Mick DonahooIts:
Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Freeze Tag, Inc. and will be retained by Freeze Tag, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1995 SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           8,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  931,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    959,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,038,000
<PP&E>                                       2,199,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,019,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,776,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,279,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       539,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,121,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,776,100
<SALES>                                      3,597,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,597,700
<CGS>                                        2,383,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,383,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               747,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                351,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   144,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            207,400
<DISCONTINUED>                               (186,600)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>