St. Charles County, Missouri

Recovery Plan 

State and Local Fiscal Recovery 

Funds

2021 Report

Note: The Recovery Plan Performance Report will provide the public and Treasury information on the 

projects that recipients are undertaking with program funding and how they are planning to ensure 

program outcomes are achieved in an effective, efficient, and equitable manner. While this template

includes the minimum requirements for the Recovery Plan, each recipient is encouraged to add 

information to the plan that they feel is appropriate to provide information to their constituents on efforts 

they are taking to respond to the pandemic and promote an equitable economic recovery. 

Each jurisdiction may determine the general form and content of the Recovery Plan, as long as it 

meets the reporting requirements, and recipients are encouraged to tailor this template to best meet 

their needs. Use of infographics, tables, charts, pictures, case studies, and other explanatory elements 

are encouraged.
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 1

Notes on using this template

All States and territories, and metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 

residents that are recipients of State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) awards are required to 

produce a Recovery Plan Performance Report (the “Recovery Plan”). The Recovery Plan provides

information on the recipient’s projects and how they plan to ensure program outcomes are achieved in an 

effective and equitable manner. It will include key performance indicators identified by the recipient and 

some mandatory indicators identified by Treasury. Each annual Recovery Plan must be posted on the 

public-facing website of the recipient by or on the same date that the recipient submits the report to 

Treasury. 

The initial Recovery Plan will cover the period from the date of award to July 31, 2021 and must be 

submitted to Treasury by August 31, 2021. Thereafter, the Recovery Plan will cover a 12-month period and 

recipients will be required to submit the report to Treasury within 30 days after the end of the 12-month 

period (by July 31). 

Annual Report Period Covered Due Date

1 Award Date – July 31, 2021 August 31, 2021

2 July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2022 July 31, 2022

3 July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 July 31, 2023

4 July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 July 31, 2024

5 July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 July 31, 2025

6 July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026 July 31, 2026

7 July 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026 March 31, 2027

Instructions:

This document is meant as a suggested template for applicable SLFRF recipients to assist them in 

submitting their Recovery Plan. Recipients should consult the SLFRF Guidance on Recipient 

Compliance and Reporting Responsibilities (Reporting Guidance) located at 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/SLFRF-Compliance-and-Reporting-Guidance.pdf for detailed 

guidance on the submission of this report.

Treasury encourages Recipients to tailor this report to best meet their needs in terms of format and 

content. Treasury recommends the use of infographics, tables, charts, pictures, case studies, and other 

explanatory elements in describing their programs.

Text in italics represents the requirements from the Reporting Guidance and is meant to serve as a 

reference as recipients prepare their Recovery Plan. This instructions page and the text in italics should 

be removed before the final transmitted report is published and submitted to Treasury. 

Additional information around Expenditure Categories is located in Appendix 1 of the Reporting 

Guidance. 

For More Information

More information about the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund program and associated reporting 

requirements are located at www.treasury.gov/SLFRP .

Questions on reporting, eligible uses, or other general topics should be directed to SLFRP@treasury.gov.
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 2

St. Charles County, Missouri

2021-2024 Recovery Plan

Table of Contents

General Overview........................................................................................................................3

Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................3

Uses of Funds ...........................................................................................................................3

Promoting Equitable Outcomes.................................................................................................4

Community Engagement...........................................................................................................5

Labor Practices .........................................................................................................................5

Use of Evidence ........................................................................................................................5

Table of Expenses by Expenditure Category ............................................................................6

Project Inventory.........................................................................................................................8

Example Project .......................................................................................................................9

Additional Projects.....................................................................................................................9

Ineligible Activities: Tax Offset Provision .............................................................................10
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 3

GENERAL OVERVIEW

Executive Summary 

In this section, provide a high-level overview of the jurisdiction’s intended and actual uses of 

funding including, but not limited to: the jurisdiction’s plan for use of funds to promote a 

response to the pandemic and economic recovery, key outcome goals, progress to date on 

those outcomes, and any noteworthy challenges or opportunities identified during the reporting 

period. See Section C(1) on page 24 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information. 

1. An investment of $3.25 million in the County venue (St. Charles County has a 

10,000 seat arena and dedicated parking) that is used for Public Health mass 

vaccination, testing and for storage of PPE. This capital investment in the public 

facility will meet pandemic operational needs for public health services. In 

addition, when not in use for that purpose, it serves to support tourism, travel and 

hospitality uses in the county and region. 

2. An investment of $57.25 million in the County Correctional facility to address this 

incarcerated population disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. The 

adaption of the facility to add a unit for a mental health/substance abuse to

address the increase in pretrial individuals with mental health and substance 

abuse disorders. The addition of units for 172 individuals to promote healthier 

living conditions for incarcerated individuals, and working conditions for law 

enforcement correctional staff. This capital investment in the correctional facility 

will allow corrections to meet pandemic operational needs for greater access to 

virtual court appearances, virtual visitation, access to programs and services for 

incarcerated individuals, virtual connection to employment services to plan for 

post-incarceration and will deal with the impact of the pandemic on available

correctional staff and critical services workers. The addition will include a 

modernized central food service to address staff shortages and inmate prerelease employment training opportunities. 

3. An investment of $4.5 million in non-profit services for children, persons with 

intellectual disabilities, and veterans. These services will address a number of 

issues, including mental health and substance abuse, loss of educational 

opportunity, need for medical care or other services

4. An investment of $8.35 million in Public Health, alternate public health services, 

correctional and other eligible law enforcement costs from March 3, 2021 through 

December 31, 2024

5. An investment of $1.0 million for middle mile broadband projects with emphasis 

on ensuring middle mile projects have potential or partnered last-mile networks 

that could or would leverage the middle-mile network. 

6. An investment of $700,000 in regional law enforcement intelligence and 

information sharing to break down silos between regional law enforcement 

departments to share information to combat gun violence and criminal activity in 

the metropolitan area. 

7. Up to 10% will be for administrative costs of program monitoring, and compliance. 
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 4

Uses of Funds

Describe in further detail your jurisdiction’s intended and actual uses of the funds, such as how 

your jurisdiction’s approach would help support a strong and equitable recovery from the 

COVID-19 pandemic and economic downturn. Describe any strategies employed to maximize 

programmatic impact and effective, efficient, and equitable outcomes. Given the broad eligible 

uses of funds and the specific needs of the jurisdiction, explain how the funds would support the 

communities, populations, or individuals in your jurisdiction. Address how you are promoting 

each of the following Expenditure Categories, to the extent they apply: 

a. Public Health (EC 1)

b. Negative Economic Impacts (EC 2)

c. Services to Disproportionately Impacted Communities (EC 3)

d. Premium Pay (EC 4)

e. Water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure (EC 5)

f. Revenue Replacement EC 6)

Where appropriate, include information on your jurisdiction’s use (or planned use) of other 

federal recovery funds including other programs under the American Rescue Plan such as 

Emergency Rental Assistance, Housing Assistance, and so forth, to provide broader context on 

the overall approach for pandemic recovery.

See Section C(2) on page 24 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information.

PROJECT 1

Expenditure Category EC 1 is addressed by Project 1. Project 1 is an investment 

of $3.25 million in the County’s public venue which is strategically located 

between two major regional transportation routes. The venue is a 10,000-seat 

arena and large dedicated parking. It serves a primary purpose of being a tourism 

and hospitality site that draws people from out of town and all over the 

metropolitan area. It has a secondary planned use for public health and public 

emergencies to serve as a mass distribution point for medications as well as a 

storage site for personal protective equipment. While the building was exercised 

a few years ago for this secondary planned use, its use as a site for testing in 

2020-2021 and then for vaccination in 2021 revealed some upgrades that need to 

be made. This is a key site, especially for vaccination, with upward of 7,000 

people a week being vaccinated at this facility. 

This capital and technological investment in the public facility will involve 

upgrading the mechanical systems for the building, including improved filtration, 

replacing the roof, repairing a portion of the parking lot, and boosting wi-fi so that 

data can be entered in real time. These upgrades to the building meet pandemic 

operational needs for public health services. 
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 5

In addition, when not in use for that purpose, this venue supports tourism, travel 

and hospitality uses in the county and region. The venue pulls audiences from all 

over the St. Louis region for concerts, sporting events and other events. 

______________________________________________________________________

PROJECT 2

Expenditure Category EC 1 is addressed by Project 2. An investment of $57.25 

million will be made in the County Correctional facility to address this 

incarcerated population disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. In 2020 and 

2021 protocols were put in place to attempt to keep detainees, inmates and 

correction staff healthy and safe. With the trial level courts not able to conduct 

trials, detainees were not able to obtain court dates. The facility was unable to 

allow in-person visitation due to the threat of transmission. Few opportunities 

existed for persons who were incarcerated to participate in any type of program. 

Additionally, staff shortages due to illness and then due to staff leaving the 

workforce have put the inmates at risk of having to be confined to their cell at

times. Finally, the pandemic has resulted in a rise in drug addiction and mental 

health issue in pretrial detainees. 

This is a capital and technological investment in the facility. It is intended to add 

a four (4) residential/living units, to upgrade the kitchen facility (in part to allow for 

inmate job experience), to increase access to technology for virtual court 

appearances and virtual visitation, and to add a centralized elevator for better 

response to emergency situations involving all persons who are incarcerated in 

the facility. 

One unit will address to mental health/substance abuse issues of pretrial 

individuals. In addition, three (3) other units for one hundred seventy-two (172)

individuals will promote healthier living conditions as well as working conditions 

for law enforcement correctional staff. Capital investment in this congregate 

correctional facility meets pandemic operational needs for greater access to 

virtual court appearances, virtual visitation, access to programs and services for 

incarcerated individuals, virtual connection to employment services to plan for 

post-incarceration and will deal with the impact of the pandemic on available 

correctional staff and critical services workers. 

_____________________________________________________________________

PROJECT 3

Expenditure Category EC 2 is addressed by Project 3. This is an investment of 

$4.5 million in non-profit services for children, persons with intellectual 

disabilities and veterans. Services may address issues for these populations 

such as mental health and substance abuse, loss of educational opportunity, 
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 6

support for veterans and for the community’s need for medical care or other 

services. 

_____________________________________________________________________

PROJECT 4

Expenditure Category: EC 1 is addressed by Project 4. This project addresses 

PPE, health, alternative public health and health access, supplies, payroll 

expenses for public safety, public health, inmate and other health care and similar 

employees whose services are substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding 

to the COVID-19 public health emergency. An investment of $8.35 million in Public 

Health, health services to inmates, as well as families using the health services of 

the Department of Public Health, correctional and other eligible law enforcement 

costs from March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024. 

PROJECT 5

Expenditure Category: EC 5 is addressed by Project 5. This project calls for an

investment of $1.0 million for middle mile broadband projects with emphasis on 

ensuring middle mile projects have potential or partnered last-mile networks that 

could or would leverage the middle-mile network. 

______________________________________________________________________

PROJECT 6

Expenditure Category: EC 3 is addressed with Project 6. An investment of 

$700,000 in (Regional Information and Intelligence sharing to address violence in 

the St. Louis/St. Charles/Jefferson region. While information technology has 

improved many individual aspects of law enforcement operations, it has also 

inadvertently created information silos that prevent police departments and their

officers on the street from obtaining the data they need for situational awareness, 

officer safety, and strategic deployment of resources. Violence, gun crimes and 

criminal activity in general does not recognize jurisdictional boundaries of 

governments. Officers and administrators do not have access to the right data or 

spend hours finding and verifying the information they need — often without easy

access. A small example, a law enforcement jurisdiction has a residence with a 

history of hostility toward law enforcement where the residents are known to 

traffic in drugs and are heavily armed. Dispatch knows to always send two cars to 

a response at that location. But without regional information sharing when the 

residents of that house are 20 miles away, in another county, and a traffic stop is 

initiated? The officer on the traffic stop is not aware of that background. With

regional information and intelligence sharing, officers can be aware of relevant 

data across departments. Modern policing needs one reliable information source, 

especially when it comes to risk factors for violence in the community. When all 

police departments in the region have efficient access to the same set of reliable 
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 7

data and real time information related to crimes, especially those involving gun 

violence, it can help with crime clearance, allow for proactive and strategic 

resource deployments, empower predictive policing, and ensure departments can

exercise options to avoid violent confrontation with criminals that put the general 

public, suspects and officers at risk. 

_____________________________________________________________________

Note: For all projects, as set forth in the U.S. Department of Treasury “Compliance 

and Reporting Guidance” for “State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds”, June 24, 

2021, Version 1.1, the County may use funds for administering the SLFRF 

program, including the costs of effective management and oversight and 

consultation for ensuring compliance with legal, regulatory and other 

requirements, including evaluation and data analysis. Costs shall be reasonable 

and allocable as outlined in 2 CFR 200.404 and 2 CFR 200.405. Pursuant to the 

SLFRF Award Terms and Conditions, the County may charge both direct and 

indirect costs to the SLFRF award as administrative costs. Direct costs are those 

that are identified specifically as costs of implementing the SLFRF program 

objectives, such as contract support, materials, and supplies for a project. Indirect 

costs are general overhead costs of an organization where a portion of such costs 

are allocable to the SLFRF award, such as the cost of the administrative functions. 

Each category of cost will be treated consistently in like circumstances as direct 

or indirect, and the County will not charge the same administrative costs to both 

direct and indirect cost categories, or to other programs. The County does not 

have a NICRA, thus it will use the de minimis rate of ten percent of the modified 

total direct costs pursuant to 2 CFR 200.414(f).

Promoting equitable outcomes 

In this section, describe efforts to date and intended outcomes to promote equity. Each annual 

report to follow must provide an update, using qualitative and quantitative data, on how the 

recipients’ approach achieved or promoted equitable outcomes or progressed against equity 

goals during the performance period.

Describe efforts to promote equitable outcomes, including how programs were designed with 

equity in mind. Include how your jurisdiction will consider and measure equity at the various 

stages of the program, including: 

a. Goals: Are there particular historically underserved, marginalized, or adversely 

affected groups that you intend to serve?

b. Awareness: How equal and practical is the ability for residents or businesses to 

become aware of the services funded by the SLFRF?
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 8

c. Access and Distribution: Are there differences in levels of access to benefits and 

services across groups? Are there administrative requirements that result in 

disparities in ability to complete applications or meet eligibility criteria?

d. Outcomes: Are intended outcomes focused on closing gaps, reaching universal levels 

of service, or disaggregating progress by race, ethnicity, and other equity dimensions 

where relevant for the policy objective?

Describe how your jurisdiction’s planned or current use of funds prioritizes economic and 

racial equity as a goal, names specific targets intended to produce meaningful equity results 

at scale, and articulates the strategies to achieve those targets. Explain how your 

jurisdiction’s overall equity strategy translates into the specific services or programs offered 

by your jurisdiction in the following Expenditure Categories: 

a. Negative Economic Impacts (EC 2): assistance to households, small businesses, 

and non-profits to address impacts of the pandemic, which have been most severe 

among low-income populations. This includes assistance with food, housing, and 

other needs; employment programs for people with barriers to employment who 

faced negative economic impacts from the pandemic (such as residents of lowincome neighborhoods, minorities, disconnected youth, the unemployed, formerly 

incarcerated people, veterans, and people with disabilities); and other strategies that 

provide disadvantaged groups with access to education, jobs, and opportunity.

b. Services to Disproportionately Impacted Communities (EC 3): services to address 

health disparities and the social determinants of health, build stronger neighborhoods 

and communities (e.g., affordable housing), address educational disparities (e.g., 

evidence-based tutoring, community schools, and academic, social-emotional, and 

mental health supports for high poverty schools), and promote healthy childhood 

environments (e.g., home visiting, child care).

Describe your jurisdiction’s efforts to date and intended outcomes to promote equity using 

qualitative and quantitative data on how the jurisdiction’s approach achieved or promoted 

equitable outcomes or progressed against equity goals. Describe any constraints or 

challenges that impacted project success in terms of increasing equity. 

Describe the geographic and demographic distribution of funding, including whether it is 

targeted toward traditionally marginalized communities.

See Section C(3) on pages 24 and 25 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information.

Community Engagement 

St. Charles County’s draft Interim Report outlines the planned use of funds and will be 

published to the community with the County Council’s meeting notice providing public 

notice that the County Council will consider a resolution supporting the plan. At that 

meeting the Council will take comment from the public on the proposed projects and use 

of funds. Additionally, the County administration has reached out to the children’s 

services community through the Children’s Community Resource Board, a political 

subdivision exclusively serving the needs of children in St. Charles County by funding a
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 9

variety of non-profit organizations. The CCRB is a year to year funding source for the 

health, mental health and well-being of children throughout the County. It is an 

independent political subdivision which oversees children’s services. That board will 

take the primary role in awarding funds to children’s pandemic needs. Similarly, the 

County has been in communication with the Developmental Disability Resource Board, a 

political subdivision which operates solely in St. Charles county to serve the needs of 

individuals with intellectual disabilities. That board will take the primary role in awarding 

funds to needs arising from that population. The County has also had communication

with local veterans’ organizations. These organizations provide support and services for 

programs serving county pre-teens and teenagers. With regard to the incarcerated 

population in the County’s adult correctional facility, the County has toured decision 

making citizens from all municipalities in the county through the jail and received 

unilateral support for the need to remake the detention space and its supporting services 

to provide for the project described herein. Additionally, as projects are funded, they will 

each be presented at a meeting of the County Council and constituents, communitybased organizations and the public in general will have the opportunity to provide 

comment and feedback. 

Labor Practices 

Describe workforce practices on any infrastructure projects being pursued (EC 5). How are 

projects using strong labor standards to promote effective and efficient delivery of high-quality 

infrastructure projects while also supporting the economic recovery through strong employment 

opportunities for workers? For example, report whether any of the following practices are being 

utilized: project labor agreements, community benefits agreements, prevailing wage 

requirements, and local hiring.

St. Charles County government utilizes prevailing wage requirements on all construction 

bids. Any successful bidder engaged as a contractor on a construction project must 

agree that the prevailing rates of pay shall be paid to skilled and unskilled labor 

employed under the terms of the contract. The Prevailing rate shall be that published by

the Missouri Department of Labor for St. Charles County in effect at the time of Bid 

opening. The County has penalties in its contracts such that a contractor shall forfeit one 

hundred dollars ($100) for each workman employed, for each calendar day, or portion 

thereof, such workman is paid less than the said stipulation rates for any work done 

under any county construction contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him. 

Contractors are required to use the State of Missouri’s Certified Payroll Form for

Contractor Payroll Records.

Further, in accordance with Missouri’s Domestic Product Procurement Act as enacted in 

the Revised Statutes of Missouri 34.350-34.359, bidders/contractors are advised that any 

goods purchased or leased by any public agency where the purchase, lease or contract 

involves the expenditure of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) or more, shall be 

manufactured or produced in the United States. Section 34.350.2(1) of that Act specifies 

that the term “public agency” includes all political subdivisions of the State of Missouri, 

which definition includes counties. The requirements of the Buy American Act do not 
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 10

apply if there are other exceptions to the Buy American mandate in RSMo 34.353 that are 

met.

Use of Evidence 

Identify whether SLFRF funds are being used for evidence-based interventions and/or if projects 

are being evaluated through rigorous program evaluations that are designed to build evidence.

Specifically, in this section, recipients should describe their overall approach for using evidence 

and evaluation, including how a Learning Agenda (either narrowly focused on SLFRF or broadly 

focused on the recipient’s broader policy agenda) could support their overarching evaluation 

efforts in order to create an evidence-building strategy for their jurisdiction. However, detailed 

evidence information for each project should be included in the Project Inventory (see details in 

the Project Inventory section below). 

See Section C(6) on page 26 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information.

There are no program evaluations to report at this time in that no projects have been 

untaken. All are in the projected planning phase due to the lack of a final rule.

Table of Expenses by Expenditure Category

In this section, list the amount of funds used in each Expenditure Category. The table should 

include cumulative expenses to date within each category, and the additional amount spent 

within each category since the last annual Recovery Plan.

Jurisdictions may modify the table as needed by deleting unused rows where they have not 

expended any funds or by adding columns to more clearly characterize their program

expenditures over time.

For the initial Recovery Plan, the amounts listed for “Cumulative expenditures to date” and 

“Amount spent since last Recovery Plan” will be equal.

Category Cumulative

expenditures to 

date ($)

Amount spent 

since last 

Recovery Plan

1 Expenditure Category: Public Health

1.1 COVID-19 Vaccination

1.2 COVID-19 Testing

1.3 COVID-19 Contact Tracing

1.4 Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing 

Homes, Prisons/Jails, Dense Work Sites, 

Schools, etc.)

1.5 Personal Protective Equipment

1.6 Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care 

Facilities)
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 11

Category Cumulative

expenditures to 

date ($)

Amount spent 

since last 

Recovery Plan

1.7 Capital Investments or Physical Plant Changes 

to Public Facilities that respond to the COVID19 public health emergency

1.8 Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses 

(including Communications, Enforcement, 

Isolation/Quarantine)

1.9 Payroll Costs for Public Health, Safety, and 

Other Public Sector Staff Responding to 

COVID-19

1.10 Mental Health Services

1.11 Substance Use Services

1.12 Other Public Health Services

2 Expenditure Category: Negative Economic 

Impacts

2.1 Household Assistance: Food Programs 

2.2 Household Assistance: Rent, Mortgage, and 

Utility Aid 

2.3 Household Assistance: Cash Transfers 

2.4 Household Assistance: Internet Access 

Programs

2.5 Household Assistance: Eviction Prevention

2.6 Unemployment Benefits or Cash Assistance to 

Unemployed Workers

2.7 Job Training Assistance (e.g., Sectoral jobtraining, Subsidized Employment, Employment 

Supports or Incentives)

2.8 Contributions to UI Trust Funds*

2.9 Small Business Economic Assistance (General)

2.10 Aid to nonprofit organizations

2.11 Aid to Tourism, Travel, or Hospitality

2.12 Aid to Other Impacted Industries

2.13 Other Economic Support 

2.14 Rehiring Public Sector Staff

3 Expenditure Category: Services to 

Disproportionately Impacted Communities

3.1 Education Assistance: Early Learning 

3.2 Education Assistance: Aid to High-Poverty 

Districts

3.3 Education Assistance: Academic Services 

3.4 Education Assistance: Social, Emotional, and 

Mental Health Services 

3.5 Education Assistance: Other 

3.6 Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care 
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 12

Category Cumulative

expenditures to 

date ($)

Amount spent 

since last 

Recovery Plan

3.7 Healthy Childhood Environments: Home Visiting 

3.8 Healthy Childhood Environments: Services to 

Foster Youth or Families Involved in Child 

Welfare System 

3.9. Healthy Childhood Environments: Other 

3.10 Housing Support: Affordable Housing 

3.11 Housing Support: Services for Unhoused 

persons 

3.12 Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance 

3.13 Social Determinants of Health: Other 

3.14 Social Determinants of Health: Community 

Health Workers or Benefits Navigators 

3.15 Social Determinants of Health: Lead 

Remediation

3.16 Social Determinants of Health: Community 

Violence Interventions 

4 Expenditure Category: Premium Pay

4.1 Public Sector Employees

4.2 Private Sector: Grants to other employers 

5 Expenditure Category: Infrastructure

5.1 Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment

5.2 Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection 

and conveyance

5.3 Clean Water: Decentralized wastewater

5.4 Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows

5.5 Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure

5.6 Clean Water: Stormwater

5.7 Clean Water: Energy conservation

5.8 Clean Water: Water conservation

5.9 Clean Water: Nonpoint source 

5.10 Drinking water: Treatment

5.11 Drinking water: Transmission & distribution

5.12 Drinking water: Transmission & distribution: 

lead remediation

5.13 Drinking water: Source

5.14 Drinking water: Storage 

5.15 Drinking water: Other water infrastructure

5.16 Broadband: “Last Mile” projects

5.17 Broadband: Other projects

6 Expenditure Category: Revenue Replacement

6.1 Provision of Government Services
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 13

Category Cumulative

expenditures to 

date ($)

Amount spent 

since last 

Recovery Plan

7 Administrative and Other

7.1 Administrative Expenses 

7.2 Evaluation and data analysis 

7.3 Transfers to Other Units of Government

7.4 Transfers to Nonentitlement Units 

(States and Territories only)

See Section C(7) on page 27 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information.

Project Inventory 

In this section, jurisdictions should provide a description of each project undertaken. See 

Section C(8) on page 27 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information. Below is an 

example of how to present the information noted in the Reporting Guidance, which incorporates 

project details as well as evidence and performance measure information outlined in the 

relevant sections above. This information should be replicated for all of the jurisdiction’s 

projects.

Example Project 

Project [Identification Number]: [Project Name]

Funding amount: [Funding amount]

Project Expenditure Category: [Category number, Category Name]

Project overview

• A description of the project that includes an overview of the main activities of the project, 

the approximate timeline, primary delivery mechanisms and partners, if applicable, and 

intended outcomes. 

• Link to the website of the project if available 

• How project contributes to addressing climate change (for infrastructure projects under 

EC 5)

Use of Evidence

• Briefly describe the goals of the project, and whether SLFRF funds are being used for 

evidence-based interventions, the evidence base for the interventions, and/or if projects 

are being evaluated through rigorous program evaluations that are designed to build 

evidence. If a recipient is conducting a program evaluation in lieu of reporting the amount 

of spending on evidence-based interventions, they must describe the evaluation design

(see Reporting Guidance for additional details that should be included). 

• Identify the dollar amount of the total project spending that is allocated towards 

evidence-based interventions for each project in the Public Health (EC 1), Negative 

Economic Impacts (EC 2), and Services to Disproportionately Impacted Communities 

(EC 3) Expenditure Categories.
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 14

See Section C(6) on page 26 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information.

PROJECT INVENTORY

1.Project: #2021-0001.1

Project Name: St. Charles County Family Arena Public Health Support Facility and 

Tourism Project 

Funding Amount: $3.25 million

Project Expenditure Categories: Category 1 Public Health (1.7 Capital Investment or 

Physical Plant Changes to Public Facilities that respond to the COVID-19 public health 

emergency.)

Project Overview: St. Charles County has a 10,000 seat arena and dedicated parking 

that is used for Public Health mass vaccination, testing and for storage of PPE. This 

capital investment in the public facility will meet pandemic operational needs for public 

health services. In addition, when not in use for that purpose, it serves to support 

tourism, travel and hospitality uses in the county and region. 

The Goal of the Project is ensuring a centrally located and available venue that can meet 

the public health needs of the nearly 410,000 residents of St. Charles County as well as 

to support the region as a whole. Additionally, this venue is a part of the developing 

entertainment, tourism and hospitality economy of the eastern part of St. Charles 

County. This is not a project which is an evidence-based evaluation. 

2.Project: #2021-0002.1

Project Name: St. Charles County Correctional Project to Improve Mental Health/ 

Substance Abuse and Detainee Living Conditions

Funding Amount: $57.25 million

Project Expenditure Categories: Category 1 Public Health (1.7 Capital Investment or 

Physical Plant Changes to Public Facilities that respond to the COVID-19 public health 

emergency.)

Project Overview: The adaption of the facility will add a unit for a mental 

health/substance abuse to address the increase in pretrial individuals with mental health 

and substance abuse disorders. Additionally, units for 172 individuals to promote 

healthier living conditions for incarcerated individuals and the working conditions for law 

enforcement correctional staff will be added, all of the project giving consideration to 

healthy airflow and opportunities for programming, virtual services, including detainee 

access to the courts. This capital investment in the correctional facility will allow 

corrections to meet pandemic operational needs for greater access to virtual court 

appearances, virtual visitation, access to programs and services for incarcerated 

individuals, virtual connection to employment services to plan for post-incarceration and 

will deal with the impact of the pandemic on available correctional staff and critical 

services workers. The addition will include a modernized central food service to address 

staff shortages and inmate pre-release employment training opportunities. The Goal of 

the Project is to ensure those incarcerated are able to proceed with a conclusion to their 

case and that correctional staff and inmates are safe. This is not a project which is 

subject to an evidence-based evaluation.
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 15

3.Project: #2021-0003.1 

Project Name: St. Charles County Non-Profit Services to Vulnerable Populations, and 

may include transfers to other governmental units

Funding Amount: $4.5 million

Project Expenditure Categories: Category 2 Negative Economic Impacts

Project Overview: An investment of $4.5 million in non-profit services for children, 

persons with intellectual disabilities, and veterans. Services that may be addressed 

include mental health and substance abuse, loss of educational opportunity, need for 

medical care or other services in response to the negative economic impacts of the 

COVID-19 public health emergency. Other public jurisdictions with expertise in the 

provision of service to the needs of these populations will be partners with the counties 

and serve to identify the uses of the funds. St. Charles County may serve as a passthrough entity (PTE), providing the subawards to carry out this project. The subprojects 

are not yet determined. This may include a project or projects which are evidencebased interventions.

4.Project: #2021-0004.1 

Project Name: Public Health, Public Safety and Other Public Sector Response

Funding Amount: $ 8.35 million

Project Expenditure Category: Category 1 Public Health

Project Overview: Program, equipment, supplies and payroll costs for public health, 

health, alternative public health services, correctional, law enforcement and other eligible 

costs from March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2024. This may include a projects or 

sub-projects which are evidence-based interventions.

5.Project: #2021-005.1

Project Name: Middle Mile Broadband to Support Last Mile Networks Project 

Funding Amount: $1.0 million

Project Expenditure Categories: Category 5 Infrastructure (5.17 Broadband: Other 

projects) 

Project Overview: An investment of $1.0 million for middle mile broadband projects with 

emphasis on ensuring middle mile projects have potential or partnered last-mile 

networks that could or would leverage the middle-mile network. This is not a project 

which is an evidence-based intervention.

6.Project: #2021-0006.1

Project Name: Law Enforcement: Technology and equipment investment to more 

efficiently respond in the rise in regional gun violence 

Funding Amount: $ 0.7 million

Project Expenditure Categories: Category 3 Services to Disproportionately Impacted 

Communities (3.16 Community Violence Interventions)

Project Overview: An investment of 0.7 million the development of real-time law 

enforcement intelligence sharing to combat the rise in regional gun violence. This may 

include a project or projects which are evidence-based interventions. 

Additional Projects 

Project [Identification Number]: [Project Name]
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 16

Funding amount: [Funding amount]

Project Expenditure Category: [Category number, Category Name]

Performance Report

• For the Project Inventories in Section 8, include key performance indicators for your 

jurisdiction’s major SLFRF funded projects. Report key performance indicators for each 

project, or group projects with substantially similar goals and the same outcome 

measures. Jurisdictions may choose to include some indicators for each individual 

project as well as crosscutting indicators. Include both output and outcome measures. 

See Section C(9) on page 27 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information.

• In addition, you must include the mandatory performance indicators if your jurisdiction 

has projects in the relevant areas (this information may be included in each recipient’s 

Recovery Plan as they determine most appropriate). Provide data disaggregated by 

race, ethnicity, gender, income, and other relevant factors, if possible. Data should be 

presented in a table and each annual report should include updated data for the 

performance period as well as prior period data.

a. Household Assistance (EC 2.2 & 2.5) and Housing Support (EC 3.10-3.12): 

• Number of people or households receiving eviction prevention services 

(including legal representation)

• Number of affordable housing units preserved or developed

b. Negative Economic Impacts (EC 2): 

• Number of workers enrolled in sectoral job training programs

• Number of workers completing sectoral job training programs

• Number of people participating in summer youth employment programs

c. Education Assistance (EC 3.1-3.5): 

• Number of students participating in evidence-based tutoring programs

d. Healthy Childhood Environments (EC 3.6-3.9): 

• Number of children served by childcare and early learning (pre-school/preK/ages 3- 5)

• Number of families served by home visiting

See Section C(10) on page 27 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information.

There are no performance measures to report at this time in that no projects have 

been untaken. All are in the projected planning phase due to the lack of a final rule. 

Ineligible Activities: Tax Offset Provision (States and territories only)

For the initial reporting year, States and territories will report the following items related to the 

Tax Offset Provision 31 CFR 35.8. Baseline revenue or revenue-increasing covered charges 

are not required at this time.

Item Amount
St. Charles County, Missouri 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 17

a. Revenue-reducing Covered Changes $

See Section C(11) on page 28 of the Reporting Guidance for additional information.

Additional guidance will be forthcoming for reporting requirements regarding the tax offset 

provision.