Information Regarding Declarations for Covered Transactions*

2020-2022

Year Number of 

Declarations

Completed 

Action

Unable to 

Complete Action

Request for 

CFIUS Notice

Unilateral 

Agency Notice

Declarations 

Rejected**

Declarations 

Withdrawn

2020 126 81 16 28 0 0 1

2021 164 120 12 30 0 4 0

2022 154 90 14 50 0 0 0

*This table reports on the disposition of all declarations for covered transactions from 2020 to 2022, including those subject to the critical technologies pilot program

which ended in February 2020.

**Declarations can be rejected by the Committee if the parties do not satisfy the requirements in the regulations or if, during the course of CFIUS review, there is a 

material change to the transaction or information comes to light that contradicts material information provided in the declaration by the parties.
Information Regarding Notices and Presidential Decisions for Covered Transactions*

2008-2022

Year Number of Notices Number of 

Investigations

Presidential 

Decisions

Notices Cleared 

with Mitigation Notices Rejected** Total Notices Withdrawn***

2008 155 23 0 2 2 23

2009 65 25 0 5 0 7

2010 93 35 0 8 0 12

2011 111 40 0 8 0 6

2012 114 45 1 5 0 22

2013 97 49 0 9 2 8

2014 147 52 0 9 1 12

2015 143 67 0 12 1 13

2016 172 79 1 17 0 27

2017 237 172 1 30 0 74

2018 229 158 1 37 2 66

2019 231 113 1 28 1 30

2020 187 88 1 16 1 29

2021 272 130 0 26 0 74

2022 286 162 0 41 1 88

*This table and its companion table on withdrawn notices (see below) report on the disposition of cases based upon the year in which the transaction 

was filed with CFIUS. These tables include information not uniformly provided in older reports, such as the number of notices rejected and detailed 

information regarding withdrawn notices. 

**Notices can be rejected by the Committee if the parties do not satisfy the requirements in the regulations or if, during the course of CFIUS review, 

there is a material change to the transaction or information comes to light that contradicts material information provided in the notice by the parties.

***Please see second table below for further data regarding withdrawn notices.
Information Regarding Withdrawn Notices of Covered Transactions*

2008-2022

Year

Total 

Notices 

Withdrawn

Notices 

Withdrawn 

in Review

Notices 

Withdrawn in 

Investigation

Notices 

Withdrawn 

and Refiled

Notices Withdrawn 

and Refiled in Same 

Calendar Year

Notices Withdrawn 

and Refiled in Next 

Calendar Year

Notices Withdrawn 

and Transactions 

Abandoned in Light 

of CFIUS-Related 

National Security 

Concerns**

Notices 

Withdrawn 

for Any 

Other 

Reason***

2008 23 18 5 20 18 2 2 1

2009 7 5 2 4 3 1 1 2

2010 12 6 6 7 5 2 2 3

2011 6 1 5 6 4 2 0 0

2012 22 2 20 12 10 2 8 3

2013 8 3 5 1 1 0 6 1

2014 12 3 9 7 6 1 2 3

2015 13 3 10 9 6 3 3 1

2016 27 6 21 15 11 4 5 7

2017 74 4 70 44 35 9 24 6

2018 66 2 64 42 34 8 18 6

2019 30 0 30 18 15 3 8 4

2020 29 1 28 21 15 6 7 1

2021 74 2 72 63 52 11 9 2

2022 88 1 87 68 53 15 12 8

*In 2020 this table was updated to correct certain historical data regarding withdrawn notices. In 2013, the number of notices withdrawn and refiled in the same calendar year has 

been updated to 1 and the number of notices withdrawn and refiled in the next calendar year has been updated to 0. In 2014, the number of notices withdrawn and refiled in the 

same calendar year has been updated to 6. In 2015, the number of notices withdrawn and refiled in the same calendar year has been updated to 6 and the number of notices 

withdrawn and refiled in the next calendar year has been updated to 3. In 2016, the number of notices withdrawn and abandoned in light of CFIUS-related national security 

concerns has been updated to 5 and the number of notices withdrawn for any other reason has been updated to 7. In 2017, the number of notices withdrawn in review has been 

updated to 4 and the number of notices withdrawn in investigation has been updated to 70.

**Includes instances where the parties withdrew their notice and abandoned their transaction after (1) CFIUS informed the parties that it was unable to identify mitigation measures 

that would resolve its national security concerns and was prepared to refer the matter to the President for decision, or (2) CFIUS proposed mitigation terms that the parties chose 

not to accept.

***Includes commercial reasons, failure to satisfy CFIUS process requirements, non-CFIUS related regulatory issues, notices awaiting refile at time of this report, and other 

reasons.