alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1998
<CASH>                                          24,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    111,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,940
<PP&E>                                       1,020,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                 190,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 991,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,231
<BONDS>                                         59,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,256
<OTHER-SE>                                     798,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   991,098
<SALES>                                        351,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,496
<CGS>                                          118,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  172,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,282
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,133
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
#### Harold HUNT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1175.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1974.

Harold Hunt, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
#### John Raymond KISHEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1668.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 29, 1977.

Louis Vernell, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We find no reversible error as to any of the issues presented for appellate review. However, from a review of the record it is clearly apparent that the sentence imposed exceeds the lawful maximum sentence for the crime charged. The maxi*1059mum sentence for a third degree felony is 5 years (section 775.082(3)(d), Florida Statutes). The trial court sentenced the defendant to 3 years in prison followed by 4 years probation thereby exceeding the maximum allowable sentence by 2 years. See *Heatherly v. State,*343 So.2d 54, Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 76-304 opinion filed February 25, 1977; *Holmes v. State,*343 So.2d 632, Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 76-78 opinion filed February 11, 1977. Although a trial judge is permitted to enter a split sentence, the combined period may not exceed the maximum period of time provided for that particular crime. *Holmes,*supra.

Accordingly, the sentence is modified by reducing the term of probation from 4 years to 2 years. In all other respects the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

MAGER, C. J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
----

----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|           | RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.                              |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|           | By:  Resource Capital Partners, Inc., its general partner |
|           |                                                                |
| March 24, 2011 | By:       /s/ Steven R. Saltzman |
|           | Steven R. Saltzman                                                  |
|           | Vice President – Finance                                      |
|           | (Principal Financial Officer)                                       |

----

----
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Jeffry E. Sterba    |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Jeffry                E. Sterba        |
|                                |   | Chairman,                President and |
|                                |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
# dec draft
U.S. Position on IFC’s Investment in Georgia’s Paravani Hydropower Project

June 16, 2011

The United States recognizes that this cross-border project with Turkey has the potential to 

support Georgia’s economic growth, long-term stability, and energy needs by decreasing

Georgia’s vulnerability to energy shocks, while increasing its renewable energy capacity. 

Georgia has great untapped potential for hydropower, and if projects are carefully assessed for 

their cumulative environmental impact, this could be an important strategic and economic 

resource. The United States also hopes that this project will result in additional progress in 

sector reforms, which have at times been difficult.

The United States notes with concern, however, that the project document distributed to 

Executive Directors failed even to mention the participation of Lahmeyer International (an 

engineering and supervision subcontractor working on the Paravani project through its Turkish 

subsidiary Hidro Dizayn), which has been debarred at the World Bank since 2006. This raises 

serious issues about the application of 2006 Sanctions Reforms to IFC investments that, at a 

minimum, need to be disclosed and discussed to ensure that rules meant to fight Bank corruption 

are closely observed and implemented.

Although the United States is supportive of several elements of the project, it wishes to be 

recorded as abstaining due to the lack of disclosure of Lahmeyer’s participation and for 

legislatively-mandated reasons.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.







|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|/s/ | Leon J. Olivier        
|    | Leon J. Olivier        
|    | Chief Executive Officer





|    |                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                     
|    | David R. McHale                                     
|    | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date:  May 7, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FEDERAL AVIATION • ADMINISTRATION 

COMPLIANCE WITH E.O. 12866 

Section 6(a)(3)(E) ofE.O. 12866 requires agencies to identify for the public, in 

a complete, clear, and simple manner, those changes in a regulatory action 

made at the suggestion or recommendation of the Office of Information and 

Regu latory Affairs (OIRA), Office of Management and Budget. 

Title of Rulemaking: Temporary Fli ght Restrictions in 

the Proximity of Launch and Reentry Operations 

Regulatory Identification Number: 2120-AK66 

OIRA did not review the rulemaking document. 

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, but did not 

suggest or recommend any changes. 

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, and we have 

documented the changes we made at OIRA's suggestion or 

recommendation in an attachment to this sheet.
# May 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31950]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Industry Sector Advisory Committee on 
Small and Minority Business (ISAC-14)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Industry Sector Advisory Committee on Small and Minority 
Business (ISAC 14) will hold a meeting on December 15, 1997 from 9:15 
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public from 9:15 a.m. 
to 1:00 p.m. and closed to the public from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for December 15, 1997, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Department of Commerce in 
Room 4830, located at 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., unless otherwise notified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Millie Sjoberg, Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230, (202) 482-4792 or Bill Daley, Office of 
the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th St. N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20508, (202) 395-6120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ISAC 14 will hold a meeting on December 
15, 1997 from 9:15 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will include a review 
and discussion of current issues which influence U.S. trade policy. 
Pursuant to Section 2155(f)(2) of Title 19 of the United States Code 
and Executive Order 11846 of March 27, 1975, the Office of the U.S. 
Trade Representative has determined that part of this meeting will be 
concerned with matters the disclosure of which would seriously 
compromise the development by the United States Government of trade 
policy, priorities, negotiating objectives or bargaining positions with 
respect to the operation of any trade agreement and other matters 
arising in connection with the development, implementation and 
administration of the trade policy of the United States. During the 
discussion of such matters, the meeting will be closed to the public 
from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public and 
press from 9:15 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. when other trade policy issues will 
be discussed. Attendance during this part of the meeting is for 
observation only. Individuals who are not members of the committee will 
not be invited to comment.
Pate Felts,
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative, Intergovernmental 
Affairs and Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 97-31950 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     UT

<LEGEND>                      The schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from Consolidated
                              Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Statement
                              of Cash Flows for Consolidated
                              Edison Company of New York, Inc. and is
                              qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000023632
<NAME>  Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                <C>

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                       Mar-31-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                       Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          11,264,989

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>        244,370

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>             1,153,475

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>           590,088

<OTHER-ASSETS>                     938,053

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     14,190,975

<COMMON>                           588,724

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>          856,661

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                4,335,539

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     5,780,924

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              84,550

<PREFERRED>                        233,468

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               4,198,152

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                    0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>             0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>        0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>      200,000

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>             0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>        39,180

<LEASES-CURRENT>                   2,778

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     3,651,923

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      14,190,975

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          1,829,268

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>               94,140

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         1,477,190

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         1,571,330

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>            257,938

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                 648

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>     258,586

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>           80,042

<NET-INCOME>                       178,544

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>        4,536

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>      174,008

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>           124,810

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>          79,058

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>             290,114

<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0

<EPS-DILUTED>                        0

        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Prime Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2012 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date: May 21, 2015 |     |                                             
|------------------ | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                   | By: | /s/ William Tsu-Cheng Yu                    
|                   |     | William Tsu-Cheng Yu                        
|                   |     | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                   |     | (Principal Executive Officer)               



|Date: May 21, 2015 |     |                                             
|------------------ | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                   | By: | /s/ Amy Lau                                 
|                   |     | Amy Lau                                     
|                   |     | Interim Chief Financial Officer             
|                   |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### James S. RILEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-920.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40110 Summary Calendar ENRIQUE MORENO SANCHES Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE; DICK LE ONARD; G RUDOLPH GARZA, JR; ARMANDO FLORES Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:94-CV-387 Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Enrique Moreno Sanches, federal prisoner # 61759-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his F ED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion to reopen, which was filed more than 11 years after the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Hearguesthat thedistrict court erred by construing his motion as based on Rule 60(b)(1); instead, Sanches argues that his motion was based on Rule 60(b)(6), which he asserts does not have a time limit. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 3, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-40110

2 We conclude that, because Sanches’s motion is untimely under either subsection, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. A motion based on Rule 60(b)(1) must be made not more than one year after the entry ofjudgment; a motion based on Rule 60(b)(6) must be brought “within a reasonable time.” F E D. R. C IV. P. 60( c)(1). It is undisputed that Sanches’s motion was not filed until more than 11 years after the district court’s dismissal of his § 1983 complaint; therefore, it clearly was untimely under subsection (b)(1). We also conclude that Sanches has not shown that his motion was filed within a reasonable time or that extraordinary circumstances exist that would warrant relief under Rule 60(b)(6). See Hessv. Cockrell, 281 F.3d 212, 216 (5th Cir. 2002); Edwards v. City of Houston, 78 F.3d 983, 995 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). AFFIRMED.
[Cite as Mirto v. Trumbull Correctional Inst., 2010-Ohio-3153.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us

ARTHUR L. MIRTO 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

TRUMBULL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2009-08969-AD 

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT 

{¶ 1} 1) On October 8, 2009, a van owned by plaintiff, Arthur L. Mirto, was 

damaged by an employee of defendant, Trumbull Correctional Institution (TCI). Plaintiff 

filed this complaint seeking to recover damages in the amount of $596.84, the total cost 

of vehicle repair. In his complaint, plaintiff advised he carries insurance coverage for 

vehicle repair with a $250.00 deductible provision and he acknowledged his insurer paid 

$346.84 toward the cost of repair. Pursuant to the provisions of R.C. 2743.02(D)1

, 

plaintiff’s damage claim is limited to $250.00, his insurance coverage deductible. 

Plaintiff submitted the $25.00 filing fee and he has requested reimbursement of that cost 

along with his damage claim. 

{¶ 2} 2) Defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability for the 

damage to plaintiff’s vehicle. 

 1 R.C. 2743.02(D) provides in pertinent part: 

 “(D) Recoveries against the states shall be reduced by the aggregate of insurance proceeds, 
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

{¶ 3} 1) Negligence on the part of defendant has been established. Johnson 

v. State Highway Patrol (2002), 2001-12347-AD; Zapf v. Highway Patrol, Ct. of Cl. No. 

2006-07511-AD, 2007-Ohio-3104; Landman v. Ohio State Highway Patrol, Ct. of Cl. No. 

2007-01801-AD, 2007-Ohio-2414; Hutchison v. State Highway Patrol, Ct. of Cl. No. 

2008-06318-AD, 2008-Ohio-5627; Kovacik v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol, Ct. of Cl. No. 

2008-09619-AD, 2009-Ohio-1592. 

{¶ 4} 2) Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $250.00, plus the 

$25.00 filing fee which may be reimbursed as compensable costs pursuant to R.C. 

2335.19. See Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1990), 62 

Ohio Misc. 2d 19, 587 N.E. 2d 990. 

 

 

 

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us 

ARTHUR L. MIRTO 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

TRUMBULL CORRECTION INSTITUTION 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2009-08969-AD 

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

 

disability award, or other collateral recovery received by the claimant.” 
ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE

DETERMINATION

 Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth 

in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor 

of plaintiff in the amount of $275.00, which includes the filing fee. Court costs are 

assessed against defendant. 

 

 DANIEL R. BORCHERT 

 Deputy Clerk 

Entry cc: 

Arthur L. Mirto Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 

5677 Stanford Avenue Department of Rehabilitation 

Austintown, Ohio 44515 770 West Broad Street 

 Columbus, Ohio 43222 

RDK/laa 

2/25 

Filed 3/12/10 

Sent to S.C. reporter 7/1/10