SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST ( In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: Maryland Department of the Environment

Date Submitted: May 8 , 2012 Subject: Revision of Regulation .23 “Control of VOC Emis sions from Vehicle Refinishing” under COMAR 26.11.19 Completeness Review Completed by: Emlyn Vélez

- Rosa Date Completed: June 5 , 2012

Administrative Materials

ACCEPTABL E

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. A letter dated May 2, 2012 was submitted by Robert M.

Summers , Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)

. X

2. Evidence that the State h as adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a sunset or expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a

SIP submission. 2. MDE provided a copy of the Notice of Final Action for the Regulation .23 un der COMAR 26.11.19 in the Maryland Register, Volume 39, Issue 7, dated April 6, 2012. According to the notice provided, the Secretary of the Environment adopted the appeal of existing regulation and the new regulation on March 26, 2012. The effective dat e of this final action is April 16, 2012. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. The State of Maryland has legal authority under the

Environmental Article, Title 2 Annotated C ode of Maryland. X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable 4. MDE included: a copy of the final rule in document entitled

“Final text COMAR 26.11.1 9.23, effective April 16, 2012

. ” XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document i tself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conduc ting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. The l etter of submittal dated May 2, 2012 signed by Robert M. Summers, Secretary of the MDE , certifies that all state procedural requirements were followed in the adoption of this plan revision. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Copy of notice of public hearing, as published on MDE’s

website on December 8, 2011, and a certificate of publication of such notice dated December 9, 2011, signed by Diana Alegre, MDE’s Webmaster. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the

State's laws and con stitution, if applicable. 7. Certified transcript of the public hearing held on January 11, 2012, and the letter of submittal dated May 2, 2012, signed by Robert M. Summers, Secretary of the MDE, certifies that all state procedural requirements were foll owed in the adoption of this plan revision. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response

thereto. 8. Copy of comment letter dated January 11, 2012, and a compilation of public comments and MDE’s responses. X

Technical Materials

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) emissions

from coatings and cleaning solvents used d uring the preparation, application, and drying phases of vehicle refinishing. X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. SIP revision applies to all vehicle refinishing facilities in the

entire State of Maryland

. X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current

actual emission s from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain 3. The plan established requirements to limit volatile organic compounds (VOC) content by coating category

. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result

of the revision.

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration

increments, reasonable furt her progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. The SIP revision consists of regulation amendments to limit VOC emissions in order to contribute to (1) attainment and

maintenance of th e 8

- hour ozone standard, and (2) improvement of the ambient air

. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. Not applicable. No modeling demonstration was required to support the required revision

. X

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6

. N ot applicable. X

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting r equirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 7. The proposed SIP revision establishes emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, for controlling VOC emissions. X

8. Compliance/enforcement strate gies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8

. The proposed SIP revision includes compliance and enforcement requirements

. X

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 9. No special justifications are required. X

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Not a pp licable. N ot a Section 107 request. X