alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Commonwealth *ex rel.*Banning *versus*The Philadelphia, Germantown, and Norristown Railway Company.

A stranger, who has no other interest in a corporation except that which is common to every citizen, is not entitled to a judgment of ouster in a writ of *quo warranto.*

This was a writ of *quo warranto,*on the ground that the railroad company had forfeited its charter by a failure to lay a double track, within the time thereby required.

The same application had previously been made in the Court of Common Pleas, and the opinion of the Court thereon, will be found reported in the Legal Intelligencer of December 24th, 1852.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Lewis, J.

It has been decided in The Commonwealth *ex. rel.*Murphy *v.*The Farmers’ Bank of Schuylkill County, (see antea 415) that a stranger who has no interest in a corporation except that which is common to every citizen, cannot demand a judgment of ouster in a writ of *quo warranto.*The words “ any person desiring to prosecute the same,” are in that opinion construed to mean any person having an interest to be affected, or suffering a wrong to be redressed. I did not concur in the decision, because I entertained the opinion, that the words in our statute should receive the *519construction given to similar words in the statute of 9th Anne, cap. 20. But now that the decision has been pronounced- by the majority, I shall cordially acquiesce in it on this point, as one which is sustained by the soundest principles of public policy. No mere stranger should be permitted to demand the forfeiture of a charter granted by the Commonwealth, where the State herself does not demand it. She has a right to waive the forfeiture, and it is her interest in many cases to do so. In the present case it is obviously against the public interest to deprive the people of the benefit of the single track of railroad, merely because the Company have been unable to construct a double track within the time prescribed by the charter.

It is ordered, that the writ of *quo warranto*be quashed, at the costs of the relator. ’
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 6715** 

LAJOEL THEODORE ROUSE ,
Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

ERIC D. WILSON , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Gerald Bruce Lee , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 00748

- GBL

- TRJ )

Submitted : September 23, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

LaJoel T. Rouse, Appellant Pro Se. Ayana Niambi Free, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

LaJoel Theodore Rouse seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
petition, * constru ing the petition as a second or successive 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismiss ing the motion for lack
of jurisdiction . The district co urt’s order is not appealable
unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of
appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) ( B ) (2012) . A certificate
of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of
the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

(2012)

. When the district court denies relief on procedural
grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a

debatable claim of the denial of a constitu tional right.

Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484

- 85 (2000).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Rouse has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

* T he district court properly determined that Rouse could not proceed with his claims under § 2241. See United States v. Poole , 531 F.3d 263, 267 n.7 (4th Cir. 2008); In re: Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 333 (4th Cir. 2000).3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U. S. Department of Transportation

June 19, 2015

Page 16

The following attached Exhibits contain proprietary and commercial information exempt

from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 522 et seq., and

should be held in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b). 

Exhibit A – DJI Inspire 1 User Manual v. 1.2

Exhibit B – DJI Inspire 1 Maintenance Manual v. 1.0
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Idaho

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Idaho over

$7 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Clarity Credit Union Meridian CDFI $ 2,305,000 

Lewis Clark Credit Union Lewiston CDFI $ 4,900,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 11-398V

Filed: December 20, 2012

Not for Publication

*************************************

CANDICE JOHNSON, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ Fees & Costs Decision

 * Based on Respondent’s Status 

v. * Report

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Candice Johnson, Dolton, IL, for petitioner (pro se).

Jennifer L. Reynaud, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On December 17, 2012, respondent filed a status report in which respondent and 

petitioner’s former attorney, Mark T. Sadaka, agreed on an appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees 

and costs in this case. 

Mr. Sadaka attests that petitioner did not incur any costs to pursue her petition.

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims's website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

On November 8, 2012, Mr. Sadaka filed an Application for Fees and Costs requesting 

$13,237.94 in attorneys’ fees and costs. During informal discussions, respondent raised 

objections to certain items. Based on these objections, Mr. Sadaka amended his request for 

attorneys’ fees and costs and requests $8,512.94 in attorneys’ fees and costs. Respondent does 

not object to the reduced amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. 

Accordingly, the court awards $8,512.94, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and 

costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and Mark T. Sadaka, 

Esq. in the amount of $8,512.94.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________ ______________________________

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party=s filing a notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
Exhibit 10.16


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYEE COVENANTS AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to the
Employee Covenants Agreement, dated October 2, 2018, by and between EBS Enterprises, LLC (the “Company”) and Dr. Aaron
Rollins (“Employee”) (the “Covenants Agreement”) is made and entered into on the date set forth
on the signature page hereto and shall be effective immediately following the time, and subject to, AirSculpt Technologies, Inc.’s
registration statement on Form S-1 related to its initial public offering (“IPO”) being declared effective (the
 “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between the Company and Employee (the “Amendment”). Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Covenants Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, Employee and Company
mutually desire to amend the Covenants Agreement pursuant to this Amendment as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, Employee and
Company hereby agree that, as of, and subject to, the Amendment Effective Date, the Covenants Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.            The
first sentence of Section 5 of the Covenants Agreement shall be amended to replace the phrase “ending nine (9) months”
with the phrase “ending twelve (12) months”. For the avoidance of doubt, this amendment shall apply to the defined term “Restricted
Period” where such term appears in other sections of the Covenants Agreement.


 


2.            Except
as amended herein, the Covenants Agreement is hereby ratified and affirmed. If, for any reason, an IPO does not occur prior to January 1,
2022, then this Amendment will not be effective and will be null and void, but, for the avoidance of doubt, the Covenants Agreement will
remain in full force and effect.


 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, intending
to be legally bound, have executed this Amendment, effective as October 5, 2021.


 


	 	EBS Enterprises, LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/ Daniel Sollof
	 	Name: Daniel Sollof
	 	Title: Authorized Signatory
	 	 
	 	EMPLOYEE
	 	 
	 	/s/ Dr. Aaron Rollins
	 	Dr. Aaron Rollins



 


[Signature Page to Amendment to Covenants
Agreement]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: November 21, 1997, 
62 FR 62299.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: November 25, 1997, 10:00 
a.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following Docket Number and Company has been 
added as Item CAG-1 on the Agenda scheduled for the November 25, 1997 
meeting.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Item No.                      Docket No. and company    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAG-1..................................  RP96-312-000, Tennessee Gas    
                                          Pipeline Company.             
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31540 Filed 11-26-97; 1:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# FILED February

7, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Ap pellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF AP PEALS OF

TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECT ION AT NASHV ILLE
JOE LARRY T URNBO ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Wayne Chancery ) No. 8490 VS. ) ) Case No. ) 01-A-01-9307-CH-00314 BRENDA JANE (THOMPSON) ) TURNBO ) ) Defendant/Appellee. ) 

### O R D E R
The defend ant/appel lee has f iled a re spectful petition t o rehea r. It appear s that a rehearing is appropriate, and sa me is hereby g

ranted.
The parties are allowed 30 day s from entry of this orde r within which to file briefs after w hich the Co

urt will fu rther c onsider f

inal dispo sition of th

e appea l. ENTER ______________.

___________________________________ HENRY F. TODD PRESIDING

JUDGE, MIDDL

E SECTION

___________________________________ SAMUEL L . LEWIS, JUDGE

___________________________________ WILL IAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Sino Agro Food, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee Yip Kun Solomon, Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Date: October 2, 2013 |                                                                    
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                    
|                      | By: /s/ LEE YIP KUN SOLOMON                                        
|                      | Name: Lee Yip Kun Solomon                                          
|                      | Title: Chief Executive Officer and                                 
|                      | Chief Financial Officer                                            
|                      | (Principal Executive Officer)
        (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Genotypic and Phenotypic Heterogeneity In Dyslexia.
    Date: December 15-16, 1997.
    Time: December 15--6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.; December 16--8:00 a.m.-
adjournment.
    Place: Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, 
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157.
    Contact Person: Scott F. Andres, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, DSR, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5E03, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892, Telephone: 301-496-1485.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review a grant application.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The 
discussion of this application could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
application, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research and No. 93.865, Research for Mothers and 
Children], National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 24, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-31420 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31738]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD05-97-082]
RIN 2115-AE47


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; New Jersey Intracoastal 
Waterway, Manasquan River

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
Brielle Railroad Bridge across the New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, 
Manasquan River at mile 0.9, in Point Pleasant, New Jersey. Beginning 
January 12 through March 13, 1998, this deviation allows the bridge to 
remain closed to navigation between the hours of 8 a.m. to 9:45 a.m.; 
10 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.; 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.; and 2:15 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday excluding holidays. This closure is necessary to 
facilitate extensive repairs and maintain the bridge's operational 
integrity while still providing for the reasonable needs of navigation.

DATES: The deviation is effective from 8 a.m. on January 12, 1998 until 
3:30 p.m. on March 13, 1998.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Brielle Railroad Bridge is owned and 
operated by New Jersey Transit (NJ Transit). On October 7, 1997, a 
letter was forwarded to the Coast Guard by NJ Transit requesting a 
temporary deviation from the normal operation of the bridge to 
implement extensive repairs. Presently, the draw is required to open on 
signal at all times. These repairs entail replacement or reinforcement 
of stringers, floor beams, laterals and bearings. Removing the existing 
rivets and installing bolts is a major portion of the work. To perform 
these repairs, and use equipment and labor safety, maintaining the 
drawbridge span in the closed position is needed part of the time.
    Discussions with marine interests revealed that approximately four 
commercial party vessels transit through the bridge during the winter 
months. However, these vessels normally depart between the hours of 6 
a.m. and 8 a.m. Vessels engaged in half day transits return around 
noon, with full day transits returning at 6 p.m. Therefore, these 
vessels are not expected to be negatively impacted by the temporary 
deviation.
    From January 12 until March 13, 1998, this deviation allows the 
draw of the Brielle Railroad Bridge to remain closed to navigation 
between the hours of 8 a.m. to 9:45 a.m.; 10 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.; 1 p.m. 
to 2 p.m.; and 2:15 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday excluding 
holidays.

    Dated: November 12, 1997.
Roger T. Rufe, Jr.,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 97-31738 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Joseph M. Solomon, Chief Executive Officer of Fairmount Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), certifies in my capacity as an
officer of the Company that I have reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, and that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 23, 2010



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/ Joseph M. Solomon                     
|Joseph M. Solomon, Chief Executive Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fairmount Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Fairmount Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.



76
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 14 60 1 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 6 :1 1- cr-0 00 15 -GKS-KRS- 2 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us PEDRO JESUS F LORES, Defend an t-Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Sep te m be r 17 , 20 12 ) Befo re HULL, MARTIN an d B LACK, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM: Tom Dale , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Pedro Jes us Flo res inth is di rectcri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an d fil eda br ie f pu rs ua ntto And er s v. C al if or ni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 Case: 11-14601 Date Filed: 09/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2L.Ed.2 d 4 93 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s t ha t

co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t,
co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andFlo res ’s con vi ct io n a nd
se nt en ce ar e AFFIRMED
.

2

Case: 11-14601 Date Filed: 09/17/2012 Page: 2 of 2