alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Robert S. Benou Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company and Marc Benou, the Chief Operating Officer, President and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.  

 

 

| Dated: December 15, 2005 | /s/ Robert Benou                                                                                      |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Name:  Robert Benou

Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                     |  

                                                                                         |
| Dated: December 15, 2005 | /s/ Marc Benou                                                                                        |
|                     | Name:  Marc Benou

Title:  Chief Operating Officer, President and Secretary                           |

                

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 

 

13

----
June 12, 2015

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 205590
To whom it may concern, 

# KEYAIR

Key Air, LLC would like to officially requestto extend exemption number 10311, regulatory docket no. FAA-2011-0037. The Key Air, LLC exemption is setto expire on July 31, 2015. Additionally, the extended exemption, 10311 referenced above, should be edited to reflect the correct regulatory reference: FAR 135.225(f). Respectfully,**r--.,~** \ 

# \ -\'J ("\ 

# A

# Antho~y**~\~~i~Tero -··-··--~**  ChiefPilot Key Air, LLC

KEY AIR LLC 3 Juliano Drive, Suite 201, Oxford, CT 06478 203.264.0605 tel 203.264.0218 fax
Mike Allison Mayor Howard D. Partington CityAdministrator Robert G. Suelter CityAttorney Amit Patel City Clerk

Mr. Kevin Adams 

# CiREATBEND Robert L Winiecke. P.E. CityEngineer Terry Hoff HRDirector Judy Manning Deputy Clerk Christina Hayes Community Coordinator

RE: Essential AirService at Great Bend, Kansas / DOCKET

DOT-OST

-1998-3496: Great Bend January 7,2013

Dear Mr.Adams, The CityofGreat Bend welcomes this opportunity to comment on the air carrier proposals submitted under the captioned Docket. Acommittee ofcommunity leaders, airport advisory members, and airport management have reviewed the two proposals, and performed interviews with the interested parties. Included in our analysis were discussions with airport officials from Wichita, Kansas City,and Salina, and the Federal Security Director for Kansas at the TSA. While Great Bend has appreciated the service ofGreat Lakes Aviation during tbese past two years, we believe the proposal from SeaPort Airlines would best meet the goals ofour community, those ofthe Essential AirService Program, and the intent of the Congress ofthe United States. Our reasons include the following: 1. Greater frequency offlights, 18 weekly to ICT,with significantly reduced passenger fares. 2. More reliable aircraft. The Caravan is still inproduction vs. tbe Beech 1900. 3. The cost savings between the two bids is significant: approximately $541,000. 4. The SeaPort proposal more closely meets the goals ofEAS,to provide reliable air service to rural communities, and allow passenger growth that could reduce subsidy levels per passenger.

P.O. Box 1168. Great Bend. Kansas' 67530.620.793.4111. Fax 620.793.4108 www.greatbendks.net5. More reliable service. Byany measure, Great Lakes has cancelled

approximately 30% ofits scheduled flights for Great Bend since November 2013. Asofjanuary 6, only one scheduled flight into Great Bend has occurred in 2014. 6. The growth in passenger counts demonstrated by Salina with SeaPort. 7. Wichita is served by a number ofcarriers, two ofwhich are lowcost(Southwest and Allegiant). Giventhe importance ofair service to our economic vitality and growth, we appreciate this opportunity to comment. The CityofGreat Bend is committed to making the best use ofEAS,and we feel this recommendation is easily justified, both in terms ofcost and benefit to the taxpayer. Weare also committed to partner with SeaPort to significantly enhance our local air service. Webelieve that our request and commitment will make the best use ofEAS,demonstrate fiscal responsibility to the American taxpayer, and result in amuch more positive economic impact to central Kansas. In submitting these comments, Great Bend requests that the U.S.DOTwaive any EAS program requirements for air service, to include multi-engine and lS-seat requirements. Weagree to SeaPort operations in the Cessna Caravan. The Great Bend CityCouncil authorized me to submit these comments at their regular Council Meeting on January 6,2014. Thank you for considering our comments. 

# ~1{w:

MikeAllison Mayor

Cc: Senator Pat Roberts Senator Jerry Moran Governor Sam Brownback Congressman Tim Huelskamp
#### Thomas Raphael FASENMYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 6, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
#### KENASTON CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. Benjamin MANN and Rita Mann, his wife, Appellees.

No. 76-91.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 17, 1976.

Allan M. Rubin and Hugh S. Glickstein, Hollywood, for appellants.

Stan L. Riskin, of Savitt, Kotzen, Riskin & France, North Miami Beach, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C. J., CROSS, J., and JOANOS, JAMES E., Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 10.21


 


SCHEDULE “A”


FORM OF STOCK OPTION PLAN OPTION
AGREEMENT


 


This Option Agreement is entered into
between Snow Lake Resources Ltd. (the “Corporation”) and the Optionee named below pursuant to the 2021 Amended and
Restated Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached hereto, and confirms that:


 


	1.	(the “Grant Date”);



 


	2.	(the “Optionee”);



 


	3.	was granted the option (the “Option”)
to purchase common shares (the “Common Shares”) of the Corporation;



 


	4.	for the price (the “Option Price”) of $     per Common Share;



 


	5.	which shall be exercisable (“Vested”)
in whole or in part in the following amounts on or after the following dates:



 


		(a)	% on the Grant Date; and



 


		(b)	% every months thereafter;



 


	6.	terminating on     (the “Expiry Date”),



 


all on the terms and subject to the conditions
set out in the Plan. For greater certainty, once Common Shares have become Vested, the shares continue to be exercisable until the termination
or cancellation thereof as provided in this Option Agreement and the Plan.


 


The undersigned Optionee represents and
warrants that he/she is engaged to provide on, an ongoing bona fide basis, consulting, technical, management or other services to the
Corporation or to an Affiliate of the Corporation.


 


By signing this Option Agreement, the
Optionee acknowledges that the Optionee has read and understandings the Plan and agrees to the terms and conditions of the Plan and this
Option Agreement.


 


[REMAINDER INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK]


 




     


     

    

 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Option Agreement as of the day of, 20.


 


	 	SNOW LAKE RESOURCES LTD.
	 	 	 
	 	Per:	 
	 	 	Name:	 
	 	 	Title:	 



 


	SIGNED, SEALED, AND DELIVERED	)	OPTIONEE
	in the presence of	)	 
	 	)	 
	 	)	 
	 	)	 
	 	)	 
	Witness	)	Name:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63319-63320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31309]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of U.S. Patents for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or 
Partially-Exclusive Licensing

AGENCY: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the 
availability of the following U.S. patents for non-exclusive, partially 
exclusive or exclusive licensing. All of the listed patents have been 
assigned to the United States of America as represented by the 
Secretary of the Army, Washington, DC.
    These patents cover a wide variety of technical arts including: A 
method for simulating an image in real time under turbulent atmospheric 
conditions; an armed-state detector for land mines; a lead-acid battery 
desulfator/rejuvenator and a natural computing system.
    Under the authority of Section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology 
Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, 
United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the 
U.S. Army Research Laboratory wish to license the U.S. patents listed 
below in a on-exclusive, exclusive or partially exclusive manner to any 
party interested in manufacturing, using, and/or selling devices or 
processes covered by these patents.
    Title: Device for and Method of Real-Time Simulation of Atmospheric 
Effects on an Image.
    Inventors: Walter B. Miller, Jennifer C. Ricklin and Mikhail A. 
Vorontsov.
    Patent Number: 5,663,832.
    Issue Date: September 2, 1997.

    Title: Armed-Stated Detector for Antitank Mines.
    Inventor: John E.B. Tuttle.
    Patent Number: 5,665,934.
    Issue Date: September 1997.

    Title: Lead-Acid Battery Desulfator/Rejuvenator.
    Inventors: Carl Campagnuolo, Louis P. Jarvis, Anthony Pellegrino, 
Joseph DiCarlo and William Keane.
    Patent Number: 5,677,612.
    Issue Date: October 14, 1997.

    Title: Natural Computer System.
    Inventor: Somayajulu D. Karamchetty.
    Patent Number: 5,680,557.
    Issue Date: October 21, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Norma Vaught, Technology Transfer Office, AMSRL-CS-TT, U.S. Army 
Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland 20783-1197, tel: (301) 394-2952; 
fax

[[Page 63320]]

(301) 394-5815; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#78160e190d1f100c38190a1456151114"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="19776f786c7e716d59786b7537747075">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Mary V. Yonts,
Alternate Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-31309 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## 2/9/2011

Table 1: Testing Costs by Subcategory, Existing Area Sources

Row Labels Initial Testing (TCI) Initial Testing (TAC) biomass

- - Coal 6,303,000 6,303,000 liquid

- - Total 6,303,000 6,303,000

Table 2: Monitoring TCI Costs by Subcategory, Existing Area Sources

Row Labels Bag Leak Detection - TCI O2 Monitor TCI Total Monitoring TCI biomass

- - - Coal 2,045,610 683,715 2,729,325 liquid

- - - Total 2,045,610 683,715 2,729,325

Table 3: Monitoring TAC Costs by Subcategory, Existing Area Sources

Bag Leak Detection - TAC O2 Monitor TAC Total Monitoring TAC Total Monitoring and Testing TAC biomass

- - - - Coal 778,134 115,196 893,330 7,196,330 liquid

- - - - Total 778,134 115,196 893,330 7,196,330 Testing

Monitoring - TCI

Monitoring - TACModel Unit Number of Boilers Represented by Model Design Capacity (mmBtu/hr) Size Category Fuel Category Baseline Control Testing - TCI Testing - TAC Bag Leak Detection - TCI Biomass Unit 1 56 0.0598749 <10 Biomass uncontrolled 0 0 Biomass Unit 2 255 0.284338 <10 Biomass uncontrolled 0 0 Biomass Unit 3 243 0.79433232 <10 Biomass uncontrolled 0 0 Biomass Unit 4 5414 2.4587934 <10 Biomass uncontrolled 0 0 Biomass Unit 5 1524 7.44596641 <10 Biomass uncontrolled 0 0 Biomass Unit 6 3418 21.0354469 >=10 Biomass multiclone 0 0 Biomass Unit 7 48 131 >=10 Biomass multiclone 0 0 Coal Unit 1 184 0.01897488 <10 Coal uncontrolled 0 0 Coal Unit 2 153 0.2474543 <10 Coal uncontrolled 0 0 Coal Unit 3 117 0.78298735 <10 Coal uncontrolled 0 0 Coal Unit 4 2301 2.26386371 <10 Coal uncontrolled 0 0 Coal Unit 5 382 6.68176984 <10 Coal uncontrolled 0 0 Coal Unit 6 573 23.4930276 >=10 Coal multiclone 11,000 11,000 25,500 Distillate Unit 1 6632 0.05736606 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Distillate Unit 2 73548 0.3141595 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Distillate Unit 3 26537 0.73546627 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Distillate Unit 4 41604 2.4671867 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Distillate Unit 5 8392 6.76086488 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Distillate Unit 6 9016 25.3122861 >=10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Distillate Unit 7 137 173.440181 >=10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Residual Unit 1 21 0.03719324 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Residual Unit 2 109 0.29113514 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Residual Unit 3 91 0.73576 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Residual Unit 4 1246 2.68188037 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Residual Unit 5 594 5.94997049 <10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Residual Unit 6 74 17.5602083 >=10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0 Residual Unit 7 2 126 >=10 Liquid uncontrolled 0 0Bag Leak Detection - TAC O2 Monitor TCI O2 Monitor TAC Total Testing TCI Total Testing TAC Total Monitoring TCI Total Monitoring TAC

9,700 

## 8,523 1,436 6,303,000 6,303,000 683,715 115,196
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5992-5993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: Subcommittee C--Basic and Preclinical Sciences 
Subcommittee
    Date: April 2-4, 1997
    Time: 7:30 pm, April 2; 8:00 am, April 3-4.
    Place: Ramada Inn at Congressional Park, 1775 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Virginia P. Wray, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6130 Executive Blvd. 
Room 635, Bethesda, MD 20892, Telephone: 301-496-9236.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)


[[Page 5993]]


    Dated: February 4, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
NIH Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3207 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,296,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,988,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,598,193
<PP&E>                                       9,534,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,132,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,668
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,017,004
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,436,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,132,345
<SALES>                                        406,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,819
<CGS>                                          158,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,095,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (654,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (654,891)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (654,891)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2269 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2269

 To modify the presumption of service connection for veterans who were 
   exposed to herbicide agents while serving in the Armed Forces in 
        Thailand during the Vietnam era, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

     Mr. Westerman (for himself, Mr. Thompson of California, Mrs. 
Harshbarger, Mrs. Axne, Mr. McCaul, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Veasey, Mr. Ryan, 
  Mr. Stanton, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Turner, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Moulton, Mr. 
 Hill, Mr. Rush, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Baird, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Omar, 
  Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Vela, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Larsen of 
     Washington, Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. 
Rutherford, Mrs. Demings, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, Mr. Griffith, Mr. 
Harder of California, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. Kim of New Jersey, 
 Mr. Massie, Mr. Posey, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Kind, and Mrs. Kirkpatrick) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the presumption of service connection for veterans who were 
   exposed to herbicide agents while serving in the Armed Forces in 
        Thailand during the Vietnam era, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE CONNECTION FOR 
              VETERANS WHO WERE EXPOSED TO HERBICIDE AGENTS WHILE 
              SERVING IN THE ARMED FORCES IN THAILAND DURING THE 
              VIETNAM ERA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure 
that if the Secretary creates a presumption of service connection 
between the occurrence of a disease and exposure to a herbicide agent 
while serving in the Armed Forces during the covered period at a 
military base in Thailand, such presumption also applies to exposure to 
a herbicide agent while serving in the Armed Forces during the covered 
period at any military base located in Thailand without regard to where 
on the base the veteran was located or what military job specialty the 
veteran performed.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Covered period.--The term ``covered period'' means the 
        period beginning on January 9, 1962, and ending on June 30, 
        1976.
            (2) Herbicide agent.--The term ``herbicide agent'' has the 
        meaning given such term in section 1116(a) of title 38, United 
        States Code.
            (3) Veteran.--The term ``veteran'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Dear Mr. Chisholm :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3413 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proce ed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information ), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/7/15 . I f we do not receive the information , we will close the dock et without notifying you further.
If you ha ve any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

. Sincerely, /S/ Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst