alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# p. 994 .le(. rF k7~P4-NQ-oPPT-a oas Bob Boethling /DC/USEPA/US

~ 08/20/2007 04:41 PM 

### 00 3 3 To Greg Schweer/DC/USEPA/US .e, cc Cathy Fehrenbacher/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, D Lynch/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Diana " Subject Re: Fw

: TFI Submission for Urea Reaction Products RAD/EETD reviewrequested by August 17[] p Townsend/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tracy Will iamson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA LockelDC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mark

I reviewed TFI's submission on biuret as you requested. With biuret it is not quite so easy because despite some considerablesearching on my part, I could not find a closeanalog with biodegradation data. Nevertheless, I'mconfident that biuret is readily biodegradable as was the casefor isopropyl methylenediurea . I would describe low-molecular weight methylenediureas as fairlyweakstructural analogsfor biuret, but more on the basis of appearance of the molecular structure than on understanding of the mechanismof biodegradation. I did find one recent article fromAppl . Environ. Microbiol ., attached, that speaks obliquely to the issue. This article says that a biuret- hydrolyzing enzyme also is central to degradation of cyanuric acid, because biuret is an intermediate in triazine degradation . One can infer that the biuret-degrading capability is relatively common in microorganisms . This finding seems consistent with the older literature as discussed by TFI ; e.g. Nishihare et al . 1965, which I've not tried to find or read. Shapiretal2t0s.pdf Note also there seem

to be several otherworks on biodegradability (in pure culture or by purified enzymes) of biuret, but you find themin the literature on triazine degradation and one would only know this if one knows a little about degradation pathways . On the basis of the analog argument (i .e. using isopropyl MDU data) ; plus the older literature as data detailed in TFI's dossier ; plus the assumed commonness of biuret-degrading capability, I suggest that biuret be assumed to be readily biodegradable, and the testing requirement dropped . Robert Boethling Exposure Assessment Branch US EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (7406M) Washington, DC20460 202-564-8533(P) 202-564-8892(F) c.ra t rt 

# CONTAINS NOCBI
Exhibit 13.1



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
Prime Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: April 30, 2012

| | By: | /s/ Diana Chia-Huei Liu             
| | --- | ------------------------------------
| |     | Diana Chia-Huei Liu                 
| |     | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
| |     | (Principal Executive Officer)       





Date: April 30, 2012

| | By: | /s/ William Tsu-Cheng Yu                    
| | --- | --------------------------------------------
| |     | William Tsu-Cheng Yu                        
| |     | Chief Financial Officer                     
| |     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  870,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    720,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,716,200
<PP&E>                                       1,827,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 973,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,774,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,144,300
<BONDS>                                      1,375,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       615,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,228,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,774,000
<SALES>                                      3,352,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,352,900
<CGS>                                        2,269,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,269,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                412,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   144,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            268,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   268,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.85


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2381 

To extend the funding authorization for the America’s Agricultural Heritage 

Partnership, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Mrs. AXNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the funding authorization for the America’s 

Agricultural Heritage Partnership, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Protecting the Silos & Smokestacks National Heritage 

6 Area Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FUNDING AUTHORIZATION AND CAP. 

8 (a) FUNDING AUTHORIZATION.—Section 707 of divi9 sion II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Manage10 ment Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333) is amended by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2381 IH

1 striking ‘‘September 30, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘September 

2 30, 2036’’. 

3 (b) TOTAL FUNDING CAP.—Section 708(a) of divi4 sion II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Manage5 ment Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333) is amended by 

6 striking the last sentence. 

7 SEC. 3. REDESIGNATION OF HERITAGE AREA. 

8 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The America’s Agricultural 

9 Heritage Partnership established by section 703 of the 

10 Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 

11 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 104–333) is hereby 

12 redesignated and shall be known as the ‘‘Silos & Smoke13 stacks National Heritage Area’’. 

14 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg15 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

16 States to the heritage area referred to in subsection (a) 

17 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Silos & Smoke18 stacks National Heritage Area. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: December 10, 1997.
    Time of Meeting: 0900-1600.
    Place: 5201 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's (ASB) Issue Group Study on 
``Hit-to-Kill Interceptor Lethality--Phase II'' will meet for 
briefings on biological defense from staff of the Joint Program 
Office for Biological Defense. Members will also continue planning 
for final report preparation. This meeting will be open to the 
public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file 
statements with the committee at the time and in the manner 
permitted by the committee. For further information, please call our 
office at (703) 695-0781.
Wayne Joyner,
Program Support Specialist, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 97-31632 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### James MALTA, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43246.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000880416
<NAME>NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  640,555
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 31,490
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      82,614
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   226,064
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             980,723
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  160,999
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         56,084
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             217,084
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       405,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               70,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             288,639
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              980,723
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  206,883
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                        15,586
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 139,636
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 166,711
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     40,172
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          (1,318)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              50,343
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    27,961
<NET-INCOME>                                22,382
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               22,382
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                     114,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        




</TABLE>
Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending 

April 1 – June 30, 2023 

Board 

Approval 

Date 

Country Amount Type U.S. Position Background 

4/3 Morocco SDR 3.7262 billion 

US$ 5 billion 

Request for an Arrangement 

Under the Flexible Credit Line 

Support IMF Executive Board 

Approves Two-Year US$5.0 

Billion Flexible Credit Line 

Arrangement for Morocco 

4/27 Central 

African 

Republic 

SDR 141.68 million 

US$ 191.4 million 

Request for an Arrangement 

Under the Extended Credit 

Facility 

Support IMF Executive Board 

Approves a US$191.4 million 

Extended Credit Facility 

Arrangement with the Central 

African Republic 

5/17 Ghana SDR 2.242 billion 

US$ 3 billion 

Request for an Arrangement 

Under the Extended Credit 

Facility 

Support IMF Executive Board 

Approves US$3 Billion 

Extended Credit Facility 

Arrangement for Ghana 

5/24 Côte d’Ivoire SDR 2.602 billion 

US$ 3.5 billion 

Requests for an Arrangement 

Under the Extended Fund 

Facility and an Arrangement 

Under the Extended Credit 

Facility 

Support IMF Executive Board 

Approves US $3.5 billion 

Extended Fund Facility and 

Extended Credit Facility for 

Côte d’Ivoire 

5/25 Kosovo SDR 142.07 million Request for a Stand-By Support IMF Executive Board 

US$ 189.01 million Arrangement and an 

Arrangement Under the 

Resilience and Sustainability 

Facility 

Approves a New SDR 80.12 

million Stand-By 

Arrangement and an SDR 

61.95 million Resilience and 

Sustainability Facility 

Arrangement for Kosovo 

5/31 Seychelles SDR 76.72 million 

US$ 102 million 

Requests for an Arrangement 

Under the Extended Fund 

Facility and an Arrangement 

Under the Resilience and 

Sustainability Facility and 

Cancellation of the Current 

Arrangement Under the 

Extended Fund Facility 

Support IMF Executive Board 

Approves US$56 Million 

Extended Fund Facility 

Arrangement and US$46 

Million under the Resilience 

and Sustainability Facility for 

Seychelles 

6/1 Comoros SDR 32.04 million 

US$ 43 million 

Request for an Arrangement 

Under the Extended Credit 

Support IMF Executive Board 

Approves US$43 Million 

Extended Credit Facility 
Facility Arrangement for the Union of 

the Comoros 

6/14 Suriname Total program 

access reduced to: 

SDR 383.9 million 

US$ 516.4 million 

Second Review of the 

Arrangement Under the 

Extended Fund Facility, 

Requests for Rephasing and 

Reduction of Access 

Support IMF Executive Board 

Concludes Second Review of 

the Extended Fund Facility 

for Suriname 

6/26 Senegal SDR 1.375 billion 

US$ 1.834 billion 

Requests for an Arrangement 

Under the Extended Fund 

Facility, an Arrangement Under 

the Extended Credit Facility, 

and an Arrangement Under the 

Resilience and Sustainability 

Facility 

Support IMF Executive Board 

Approves US$1.51 billion 

Under the Extended Fund 

Facility and Extended Credit 

Facility, and US$324 million 

Under the Resilience and 

Sustainability Facility for 

Senegal 

2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bernard POMES, III.

No. 62363.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Bernard Pomes, III applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Jefferson.

Granted. The state shall disclose the identity and location of the informer or produce him at trial.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., dissent.
Domtar 

Nekoosa Mill 

301 Point Basse Avenue 

Nekoosa, WI 54457-1422 

Tel. : (715) 886-7785 

annabeth.reitter@domtar.com 

www.domtar.com 

September 12, 2014 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 6 

Attn: Dayana Medina 

1445 Ross Avenue #1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

SUBJECT: 

Domtar A.W. LLC’s Response to Request to Provide Information Pursuant to the Clean Air Act 

dated June 4, 2014 

Dear Ms. Medina: 

As we discussed, enclosed are the follow-up responses to Question 9 raised after our webinar presentation 

on August 21, 2014, as well as additional questions relating to the wet scrubber and two other items. 

I will forward an affidavit using the same format as the prior affidavit next week. Please feel free to 

contact me if you have any questions regarding the enclosed information or if further clarification is 

needed. 

Sincerely, 

Annabeth Reitter 

Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation 

Enclosure 

cc: Mark A. Thimke, Foley & Lardner LLP
#### J. W. WALKER, d/b/a Walker Seafood, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, formerly State Road Department of Florida, an Agency of the State of Florida and Levy County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. N-527.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 9, 1971.

Philip Barton, Gainesville, and E. C. Deeno Kitchen, of Ervin, Pennington, Varn & Jacobs, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Howard Hadley and Geoffrey B. Dobson, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The counter-plaintiff in an inverse condemnation action has appealed from an order entered by the Circuit Court for Levy County awarding attorneys’ fees for their services in the action.

The sole point presented for our determination in this appeal is whether the said court abused its discretion in making the said award for the reason that the amount of the award fails to satisfy the mandatory requirements of the Constitution and statutes of the State of Florida.

Section 6 of Article X, Florida Constitution of 1968, F.S.A., provides that private property shall not be taken except for a public purpose and “with full compensation therefore paid to each owner. * * ”

We have examined the record and briefs of the parties to this appeal and have reached the conclusion that the said award is in an amount grossly inadequate under the evidence adduced by the parties as to the amount of attorneys’ fees.

Therefore, the order appealed from must be and is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions for further proceedings consistent with the views herein-above expressed.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
No. 00-7288.

#### Oliver *v.*Kyler, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon.

Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
#### ROBSOL, INC., Champlain Building Corp., MRSR, Inc., and Eton Realties, Inc., Appellants, v. Milton B. GARRIS, Jr., Garris Engineers, Inc., and Robert Hutcheson, Appellees.

No. 76-2291.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 16, 1978.

Colson & Hicks, Susan Goldman, Miami, for appellants.

Carey, Dwyer, Cole, Selwood & Bernard and Steven R. Berger, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

HUBBART, Judge.

The plaintiffs Robsol, Inc., Champlain Building Corp., MRSR, Inc., and Eton Real-ties, Inc. appeal a final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant Robert Hutcheson in an action for damages allegedly sustained in part as a result of the defendant Hutcheson’s breach of contract *866and negligence as an architect. The plaintiffs contend on appeal that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendant Hutcheson was guilty of actionable negligence and breach of contract as an architect in submitting architectural plans to the plaintiffs’ predecessor in interest for a high rise condominium project, which plans violated the applicable municipal bulkhead line as provided for in the City of Surfside local ordinances. We agree and reverse.

The law is clear that an architect owes a duty of due care to his client in arranging site plans and drawing buildings which are in conformance with building and zoning codes as well as other similar local ordinances. The architect is liable to his client in tort and contract when that duty is breached as to any damages proximately caused by such breach. *Graulich v. Berlowe & Associates, Inc.,*338 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Maritime Construction Co. v. Benda,*262 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972); *Bott v. Moser,*175 Va. 11, 7 S.E.2d 217 (1940). See *Geer*v. *Bennett,*237 So.2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

Our review of the record herein reveals sufficient factual conflict as to whether the defendant Hutcheson breached his above-stated duty of due care to his client. The final summary judgment for the defendant Hutcheson is therefore reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

Reversed.
Https://Thegreen.Treas.Gov/Do/Ia/IMP/IMP Sharepoint/Congress And External/Reports To Congress/Quarterly Votes Report/4QREPORT-17.Docx April 17, 2018 (5:44 PM)

Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending

October 1 – December 31, 2017

Board 

Approval 

Date

Country Amount Type U.S. Position Background

11/30 Mexico SDR 62.38 billion

($88 billion)

Flexible Credit Line 

Arrangement (FCL)

Support http://www.imf.org/en/N

ews/Articles/2017/11/30

/pr17459-mexico-imfexecutive-boardapproves-new-two-yearus-88-billion-fclarrangement

12/6 Islamic 

Republic of 

Mauritania

SDR 115.92 million

($163.9 million)

Request for Three-Year 

Extended Credit Facility (ECF) 

Arrangement

Support http://www.imf.org/en/N

ews/Articles/2017/12/06

/pr17468-imf-executiveboard-approvesarrangement-under-ecffor-the-islamic-republicof-mauritania

12/11 Guinea SDR 120.488 million

($170 million)

Request for Three-Year 

Extended Credit Facility (ECF) 

Arrangement

Support http://www.imf.org/en/N

ews/Articles/2017/12/12

/pr17484-imf-executiveboard-approves-us1701-

million-under-ecf-forguinea
- 2 -

2
#### Lee Andrew JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-464.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

Edward M. Kay of Varón Stahl & Kay, P. A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

 We have carefully considered the points raised on appeal and upon examination of the record are of the opinion that reversible error has not been demonstrated. Although the information contained in the state's bill of particulars was lacking in completeness we cannot conclude that this error or omission injuriously affected the substantial rights of the defendant. However, we would point out somewhat critically that the spirit and intent of Rule 3.-140(n), 33 F.S.A., is not furthered when the state’s response is unduly restrictive. Accordingly, the final judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Treasury approves Ohio’s plan to invest $3 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Ohio

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $3 million for Broadband Infrastructure (1% of CPF allocation)

 Program Description: The Western Ohio Infrastructure Upgrade Pilot Project is designed to 

leverage existing middle mile infrastructure in western Ohio to upgrade the network’s capacity 

to provide internet at speeds of 100/100 Mbps. The upgraded capacity will also enable 

providers to provide last-mile connectivity to surrounding locations currently lacking internet 

at speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps.

‒ This program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps upon 

project completion.

‒ Internet service providers utilizing investments funded by CPF will be required to 

participate in the FCC’s Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy 

for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: Broadband Ohio, the state broadband office within the Ohio Department 

of Development 

Ohio’s Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information