23918 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2013 / Notices 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. CPSC 2011–0081] 

Request for Information Regarding 

Third Party Testing for Lead Content, 

Phthalate Content, and the Solubility of 

the Eight Elements Listed in ASTM 

F963–11 

Correction 

In notice document 2013–8858 

appearing on pages 22518–22520 in the 

issue of Tuesday, April 16, 2013, make 

the following correction: 

On page 22518, in the second column, 

in the ADDRESSES section, in the second 

and third lines, ‘‘CPSC 2010–0037’’ 

should read ‘‘CPSC 2011–0081’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2013–08858 Filed 4–22–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER 

SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Submission to OMB for Review and 

Approval for Collection of Qualitative 

Feedback on Agency Service Delivery; 

Public Comment Request 

AGENCY: Pretrial Services Agency for the 

District of Columbia (PSA), CSOSA. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

intention of the Pretrial Services Agency 

for the District of Columbia, an 

independent entity within the Court 

Services and Offender Supervision 

Agency (CSOSA) to request that the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) approve the proposed 

information collection project: ‘‘Pretrial 

Services Agency for the District of 

Columbia 2013 Judicial Survey.’’ In 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521, 

this notice announces PSA’s intent to 

submit this collection to OMB for 

approval. PSA invites the public to 

comment on this proposed information 

collection. 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by June 24, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit written 

comments, identified by ‘‘Collection of 

Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service 

Delivery’’ to: Rorey Smith, Deputy 

General Counsel and Chief Privacy 

Officer, Office of General Counsel, Court 

Services and Offender Supervision 

Agency, 633 Indiana Avenue NW., 

Room 1380, Washington, DC 20004 or to 

Rorey.Smith@csosa.gov. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice may be made available to the 

public. For this reason, please do not 

include in your comments information 

of a confidential nature, such as 

sensitive personal information or 

proprietary information. If you send an 

email comment, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the comment that is placed in 

the public docket and may be made 

available on the Internet. Please note 

that responses to this public comment 

request containing any routine notice 

about the confidentiality of the 

communication will be treated as public 

comments that may be made available to 

the public notwithstanding the 

inclusion of the routine notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rorey Smith, Deputy General Counsel 

and Chief Privacy Officer, Office of 

General Counsel, Court Services and 

Offender Supervision Agency, 633 

Indiana Avenue NW., Room 1890, 

Washington, DC 20004, (202) 220–5797 

or to Rorey.Smith@csosa.gov. For 

content support: Diane Bradley, 

Assistant General Counsel, Office of 

General Counsel, Court Services and 

Offender Supervision Agency, 633 

Indiana Avenue NW., Room 1375, 

Washington, DC 20004, (202) 220–5364 

or to Diane.Bradley@csosa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Pretrial Services Agency for the 

District of Columbia 2013 Judicial 

Survey. 

Abstract: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 

3501–3520), federal agencies must 

obtain approval from the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for each 

collection of information they collect or 

sponsor. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 

PRA (944 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires 

federal agencies to provide a 60-day 

notice in the Federal Register 

concerning each proposed collection of 

information, including each proposed 

extension of an existing collection of 

information, before submitting the 

collection of information to OMB for 

approval. To comply with this 

requirement, PSA is publishing notice 

of the proposed collection of 

information set forth in this document. 

The proposed information collection 

activity provides a means to garner 

qualitative customer and stakeholder 

feedback in an efficient, timely manner, 

in accordance with the Administration’s 

commitment to improving service 

delivery. This feedback will provide 

insights into customer or stakeholder 

perceptions, experiences and 

expectations, provide an early warning 

of issues with service, or focus attention 

on areas where communication, training 

or changes in operations might improve 

delivery of products or services. These 

collections will allow for ongoing, 

collaborative and actionable 

communications between the Agency 

and its customers and stakeholders. It 

will also allow feedback to contribute 

directly to the improvement of program 

management. 

The judicial officers at the District of 

Columbia Superior and District Courts 

are one of PSA’s critical customers. The 

Agency’s mission statement notes that 

‘‘assistance to the courts’’ is critical to 

promoting pretrial justice and 

community safety. The proposed survey 

will assess judicial satisfaction with 

PSA’s responsiveness, staff 

professionalism, the quality and benefit 

of PSA reports, PSA’s supervision of 

higher risk defendants (including those 

with mental health and substance 

dependence issues), and the provision 

of treatment services. The judicial 

survey will represent the only 

qualitative or quantitative measure of 

this important metric. PSA will use the 

collected information to support several 

organizational improvements including: 

Enhancements to PSA’s supervision of 

medium to higher-risk pretrial 

defendants; improve communications 

with the Court regarding defendant 

compliance and noncompliance with 

supervision requirements; provide 

better performance ratings of Senior 

Executive Services staff; and creation of 

a qualitative performance measure to 

gauge overall judicial satisfaction under 

PSA’s ‘‘partnerships’’ strategic objective. 

This type of collection for qualitative 

information will be used for quantitative 

information collections that are 

designed to yield reliable actionable 

results, such as monitoring trends over 

time or documenting program 

performance. 

As a general matter, information 

collections will not result in any new 

system of records containing privacy 

information and will not ask questions 

of a sensitive nature, such as sexual 

behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, 

and other matters that are commonly 

considered private. 

This evaluation study addresses 

PSA’s need for a report to inform 

strategic planning for dissemination and 

program activities to targeted 60 DC 

Superior Court and District Court 

judicial officers as survey participants— 

the universe of judicial officers hearing 

criminal matters in both courts and 

those with bail setting duties. 

The survey is intended to assess 

judicial officers’ perceptions and 

attitudes through a structured survey to 

measure judicial perceptions and 

attitudes about specific elements of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES