alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Mammography Quality; States as Certifiers Demonstration Project, 
Informational Conference; Availability of the ``Application Package for 
Participation in the States as Certifiers Demonstration Project;'' 
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following 
meeting: ``Mammography Quality, States as Certifiers Demonstration 
Project, Informational Conference.'' FDA is also announcing the 
availability of the ``Application Package for Participation in the 
States as Certifiers Demonstration Project.'' FDA is planning to 
implement a 1-year demonstration project on State certification of 
mammography facilities, which is scheduled to begin on July 1, 1998. 
Participation in the program is voluntary, and will be limited to a few 
qualified States to be selected by FDA.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 15, 1997, 11:30 
a.m. to 4 p.m. Completed ``Application Packages for Participation in 
the States as Certifiers Demonstration Project'' must be submitted to 
FDA by February 16, 1998.

    Location: The meeting will be held at 16071 Industrial Dr., 
Gaithersburg, MD 20877.

    Contact Person: Miguel R. Kamat, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health (HFZ-240), 1350 Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850, 
301-827-2968.

    Registration: Registration for this meeting is not required.
    Electronic Access: Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the 
application package may do so by using the World Wide Web (WWW). The 
Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) maintains an entry on 
the WWW for easy access to information including text, graphics, and 
files that may be downloaded to a PC with access to the WWW. Updated on 
a regular basis, the CDRH home page includes the ``Application Package 
for Participation in the States as Certifiers Demonstration Project.''
    The CDRH home page may be accessed at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh. The 
``Application Package for Participation in the States as Certifiers 
Demonstration Project'' will be available at <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/
dmqrp.html">http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/
dmqrp.html</a>.

    Dated: November 28, 1997.
D. B. Burlington,
Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 97-32082 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
U.S. Comments on the EBRD’s Environmental and Social Policy
May 7, 2014

The United States appreciates the EBRD Management's efforts to update the Environmental and
Social Policy (ESP), including both the public consultations and the engagement with its Board
members. The United States supports the proposed ESP. There are numerous improvements to
an already strong policy. To flag two in particular: Given the importance of climate change, the
United States welcomes the several new references relating to climate change, including further
studies focusing on climate change when appropriate. The United States also welcomes the
inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity in the definition of vulnerable people, further
strengthening the EBRD’s inclusive approach to development.

The United States appreciates the EBRD’s commitment that the EBRD will not knowingly
finance projects that would contravene country obligations under relevant international treaties
and agreements, as identified during project appraisal. In the current policy, the corresponding
commitment specifically references human rights as among the treaties and agreements covered.
It is our understanding that this commitment still covers human rights treaties and agreements,
even though “human rights” is not mentioned explicitly in the revised paragraph 8 of the ESP.
We welcome the reference to additional studies on human rights, when they are deemed
appropriate,

It is important that affected people benefit from EBRD projects. However, there are many
different ways for this to be done. The United States encourages the EBRD, its clients, and
people affected by its projects, to consider and utilize the best approach for each project.

The United States will continue to look to the EBRD for strong implementation of its safeguard
policies, including in such challenging situations as corporate finance projects and situations
where activities related to the project are not all financed by the EBRD. In addition, the United
States urges the EBRD to support its clients in providing robust information disclosure to
affected people on Category B projects.

As the EBRD moves forward in implementing its new policy, the United States encourages the
EBRD to increase its engagement with civil society organizations in those areas where such
organizations have expertise. For example, the United States believes that some civil society
organizations have experience that might be useful in the areas of gender, sexual orientation,
gender identity and disability.

Lastly, the United States encourages the EBRD to consider how to incorporate safeguards into
ex-post evaluations.
#### Charles SEELY. Appellant, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and William Taylor, Appellees.

No. 69-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 20, 1970.

Council Wooten, Jr., of Billings & Frederick, Orlando, for appellant.

*548R. G. Ross, of Pitts, Eubanks & Ross, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and the appellate presentation and find that the presumption of correctness which accompanies orders allowing a new trial has not been overcome. No abuse of discretion having been demonstrated, the order granting a new trial is hereby affirmed. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 12; and Volk v. Goetz, Fla.App. 1967, 206 So.2d 250; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 317.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2016

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/29 10/3 10/6 40.00 42.00 36.00 98.00 20.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 10/6 10/11 10/13 40.00 42.00 36.00 20.00 106.00 32.00

10/13 10/17 10/20 45.00 42.00 36.00 96.00 27.00

10/20 10/24 10/27 50.00 42.00 36.00 101.00 27.00

10/27 10/31 11/3 55.00 42.00 36.00 101.00 32.00

11/3 11/7 11/10 50.00 40.00 36.00 20.00 118.00 28.00

11/10 11/14 11/17 50.00 40.00 34.00 111.00 13.00

11/17 11/21 11/25 45.00 38.00 32.00 116.00 -1.00

11/23 11/28 12/1 45.00 36.00 30.00 121.00 -10.00

12/1 12/5 12/8 45.00 34.00 28.00 20.00 130.00 -3.00

12/8 12/12 12/15 40.00 32.00 26.00 116.00 -18.00

12/15 12/19 12/22 40.00 30.00 24.00 111.00 -17.00

12/22 12/27 12/29 35.00 28.00 22.00 111.00 -26.00

1540.00 1436.00 104.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 10/6 10/12 10/17 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 10/6 10/12 10/17 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 10/6 10/13 10/17 12.00 0.00 30.00 26.00

30-year TIPS (r) 10/13 10/20 10/31 5.00 -2.00

2-year note 10/20 10/25 10/31 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 10/20 10/26 10/31 15.00 0.00

5-year note 10/20 10/26 10/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 10/20 10/27 10/31 28.00 0.00 131.56 -23.56

3-year Note 11/2 11/8 11/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note 11/2 11/9 11/15 23.00 0.00

30-year Bond 11/2 11/10 11/15 15.00 0.00 58.51 3.49

2-year FRN (r) 11/17 11/23 11/25 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

10-year TIPS (r) 11/10 11/17 11/30 11.00 0.00

2-year note 11/17 11/21 11/30 26.00 0.00

5-year note 11/17 11/22 11/30 34.00 0.00

7-year note 11/17 11/23 11/30 28.00 0.00 87.01 11.99

3-year Note 12/8 12/12 12/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 12/8 12/12 12/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 12/8 12/13 12/15 12.00 0.00 30.00 26.00

5-year TIPS (r) 12/15 12/22 12/30 14.00 -2.00

2-year FRN (r) 12/22 12/28 12/30 13.00 0.00 0.00 27.00

421.00 337.07 83.93

Estimates are italicized. r = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 188
#### Willie Lee GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 24, 1977.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Douglas A. Walláce, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The record is devoid of any evidence that the trial court complied with the provisions of Chapter 801 Florida Statutes, known as the Child Molester Act, prior to imposing sentence. The crime for which appellant was convicted is clearly one that falls within the purview of the act. Section 801.041 Florida Statutes (1975). The duty is on the judge, not the State or the defendant, to insure the procedures required by the act are followed. *Johnson v. State,*292 So.2d 426 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Strict compliance is mandatory. *Thomas v. State,*345 So.2d 778 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).

Appellant’s sentence is therefore set aside and the cause remanded for compliance with the Child Molester Act; otherwise affirmed.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and McNULTY and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2004

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/30 10/4 10/7 17.00 19.00 19.00 50.00 5.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 10/7 10/12 10/14 17.00 19.00 19.00 48.00 7.00

10/14 10/18 10/21 19.00 19.00 19.00 48.00 9.00

10/21 10/25 10/28 21.00 19.00 19.00 50.00 9.00

10/28 11/1 11/4 18.00 19.00 19.00 50.00 6.00

11/4 11/8 11/12 15.00 19.00 19.00 50.00 3.00

11/12 11/15 11/18 19.00 19.00 19.00 52.00 5.00

11/18 11/22 11/26 21.00 19.00 19.00 54.00 5.00

11/26 11/29 12/2 19.00 19.00 19.00 51.00 6.00

12/2 12/6 12/9 19.00 19.00 18.00 48.00 8.00

12/9 12/13 12/16 17.00 19.00 18.00 52.00 2.00

12/16 12/20 12/23 19.00 19.00 17.00 54.00 1.00

12/23 12/27 12/30 17.00 19.00 17.00 52.00 1.00

726.00 659.00 67.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

10-Day Bill 10/1 10/4 10/5 20.00 20.00 0.00

Matures 10/15

12-Day Bill 12/1 12/2 12/3 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 12/15

COUPONS

CHANGE 

IN SIZE

5-Year Note 10/4 10/6 10/15 15.00 15.00

10-Year TIPS (R) 10/4 10/7 10/15 9.00 9.00

5-Year TIPS 10/21 10/26 10/29 14.00 14.00 14.00

2-Year Note 10/25 10/27 11/1 24.00 26.88 -2.88

3-Year Note 11/3 11/8 11/15 24.00 24.00

5-Year Note 11/3 11/9 11/15 14.00 -1.00 27.77 -13.77

10-Year Note 11/3 11/12 11/15 13.00 -2.00 20.24 -7.24

2-Year Note 11/22 11/24 11/30 24.00 26.99 -2.99

5-Year Note 12/6 12/8 12/15 14.00 14.00

10-Year Note (R) 12/6 12/9 12/15 8.00 -2.00 8.00

2-Year Note 12/27 12/29 12/31 24.00 26.22 -2.22

183.00 128.10 54.90

R = Reopening Treasury announced a Q4 NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 121.90

A = Announced borrowing need of $122

billion on Aug 2nd
Exhibit
10.9


PROMISSORY
NOTE (“NOTE”) - 10% SIMPLE INTEREST


 


 


	$100,000.00	October 5, 2021





 


 


For
VALUE RECEIVED, SYBLEU INC. (“Borrower”) promises to pay to Bostonia Partners, Inc. (“Lender”) the principal
sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00] with accrued simple interest at the rate of 10% percent per annum on the balance. The
said principal and accrued interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America on October 5, 2022. This Note may
be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. The Borrower hereby waives any notice of the transfer of this
Note by the Lender or by any subsequent holder of this Note, agrees to remain bound by the terms of this Note subsequent to any transfer,
and agrees that the terms of this Note may be fully enforced by any subsequent holder of this Note. All terms and conditions of this
Note shall be interpreted under the laws of the state of California and venue shall be the state of California.


 


 


SYBLEU
INC.


 


By:
/s/ David Koos


Its:
Chairman and CEO


 


Accepted
By:


 


Bostonia
Partners, Inc.


 


By:/s/
Timothy Foat


Its:
President
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                             COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)


<Table>
<Caption>
                                         Nine Months Ended
                                           September 30,                              Year Ended December 31,
                                      ------------------------    -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                         2001          2000          2000          1999          1998         1997          1996
                                      ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------    ----------
<S>                                   <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>

Interest Expense                      $   66,300    $   73,500    $  100,300    $   55,200    $  101,900   $   90,400    $  142,100

Capitalized Interest                       1,150         2,918         3,946            --            --           --            --

Estimated Interest Portion of
    Rent Expense                          12,436        11,583        15,614        13,948        12,352       10,864        10,035
                                      ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------    ----------

Fixed Charges                         $   79,886    $   88,001    $  119,860    $   69,148    $  114,252   $  101,264    $  152,135
                                      ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========   ==========    ==========

Income From Continuing
    Operations Before Income Taxes    $  303,300    $  412,600    $  549,900    $  518,600    $  523,600   $  483,200    $  470,700

Add:  Fixed Charges                       78,736        85,083       115,914        69,148       114,252      101,264       152,135

      Dividends From Less Than
      50% Owned Companies                     --            --            --            --            --           --           287

Less: Equity in (Earnings)/Losses
      of Less Than 50% Owned
      Companies                           (2,479)       (2,703)       (3,367)       (1,069)          595         (320)       (1,609)
                                      ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------    ----------

Earnings Before Fixed Charges         $  379,557    $  494,980    $  662,447    $  586,679    $  638,447   $  584,144    $  621,513
                                      ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========   ==========    ==========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          4.8x          5.6x          5.5x          8.5x          5.6x         5.8x          4.1x
</Table>



                                      -16-
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

          I, Terry M.Belford, certify that: 

          1. Ihave reviewed this Form 10-K Amendment of Electromed, Inc.; 

          2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in the this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operation, and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

          a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

          b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

          c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

          a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and 

          b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

- 6 -

----
Exhibit 10.2

 


 


PERFORMANCE CONTINGENT RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS – EBITDA – AWARD NOTICE







«FIRST_NAME» «MIDDLE_NAME». «LAST_NAME»


«HOME_STREET»


«HOME_CITY», «HOME_PROVINCE»«HOME_POSTAL_CODE»







Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), you have been granted Performance Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs) based on EBITDA.  The general terms of this grant of PRSUs are outlined below.


 


 


 


Grant Date:                                      January 30, 2018



Performance Period:                       January 1 – December 31, 2018



Target Number of PRSUs:            «number_awarded»



Performance Measure:                    EBITDA


Vesting Date:                                   February 28, 2021













 


The actual number of PRSUs that can become vested is based on achieving the level of EBITDA during the Performance Period as noted below:


 


 



	
Performance Level*

	 	
% Target EBITDA

	 	
EBITDA ($ in millions)

	 	
% Target Shares Earned

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Outstanding

	 	
125%


120%


110%

	 	
$XXX


$XXX


$XXX

	 	
175%


160%


130%

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Target

	 	
100%


90%

	 	
$XXX


$XXX

	 	
100%


70%

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Threshold

	 	
80%

	 	
$XXX

	 	
40%

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Below Threshold

	 	
< 80%

	 	
        < $XXX

	 	
0%

	 	 	 







  


 







	
*

	
Straight-line interpolation will apply to performance levels between the ones shown.










Each PRSU is equivalent to one share of common stock upon vesting.







Until vested, the units represented by this award are not entitled to receive cash dividends and do not have the right to vote. This award will vest immediately upon a change in control, death or disability as defined in Section 2 of the Plan.  If you leave Havertys, other than in the case of death, disability or retirement, unvested awards are forfeited.  Except as the Compensation Committee may at any time otherwise provide in their sole discretion or as required to comply with applicable law, units not vested at retirement will vest on the Vesting Date as outlined in the grant agreement.  Retirement shall mean voluntary retirement from Havertys, on or after age 65, upon written notice from you to the Company that you are permanently retiring from the Company and the retail furniture industry.  Please consult the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan Prospectus for a complete understanding of Havertys' equity award program.







This is a summary of the award.  The grant agreement and Plan Prospectus are the authoritative source for all questions on awards made under the Plan.
#### James TALLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-2.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 1, 1974.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Elliott C. Metcalfe, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with Wright v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 291 So.2d 118.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1145** 

CHASE CARMEN HUNTER , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. JACQUELINE K. CUNNINGHAM, Individually, & In Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Insurance for Virginia; VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL; VIRGINIA BUREAU OF INSURANCE, The , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00704

- HEH )

Submitted : August 17, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Chase Carmen Hunter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversi ble error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hunter v. Cunningham , No. 3:14

- cv - 00704

- HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2015)
. We also deny her motion seeking mandamus relief and other pending motions, including her motions to elec tronically file her submissions, proceed in forma pauperis, and correct the docket. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisiona l process.
AFFIRMED