alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.7**

** **

 

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Sprott Asset Management LP, the “Manager” of the Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the “Trust”) is responsible for the integrity, consistency, objectivity and reliability of the Financial Statements of the Trust. International Financial Reporting Standards have been applied and management has exercised its judgment and made best estimates where appropriate.

 

The Manager’s internal controls and supporting procedures maintained provide reasonable assurance that financial records are complete and accurate. These supporting procedures include the oversight of RBC Investor Services, the Trust’s valuation agent.

 

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting as at December 31, 2014 using the framework found in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, management has concluded that as at December 31, 2014 the Manager’s internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

 

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent auditors appointed by the Manager of the Trust, have audited the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2014 in addition to auditing the Trust’s Financial Statements as of the same date. Their reports, which expressed an unqualified opinion, can be found on pages 2 to 3 of the Financial Statements. Ernst & Young have full and free access to, and meet periodically with, the Manager of the Trust to discuss their audit and matters arising there from, such as, comments they may have on the fairness of financial reporting and the adequacy of internal controls.

 

Steven Rostowsky

Chief Financial Officer

March 10, 2015

 

1

----
#### Howard GASKILL, Petitioner, v. The CRIMINAL COURT OF RECORD, BREVARD COUNTY, TITUSVILLE, Florida, Respondent.

No. 39475.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1, 1970.

Howard Gaskill, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The alternative writ of mandamus previously issued is quashed and the petition is dismissed. Cassoday v. State of Florida, 237 So.2d 146, opinion filed July 1, 1970.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                    One Beacon Street
                                    Boston, MA 02108

                                    July 1, 2009



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549


RE:  DWS S&P 500 Plus Fund (the "Fund"), a series of DWS Value Equity Trust (the
     "Trust") (Reg. Nos. 2-78724, 811-1444)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Trust
hereby certifies that the form of Prospectuses and Statements of Additional
Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Fund pursuant to Rule
497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80 to the Trust's
Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the "Amendment"), do not differ from that
contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent Amendment to such
Registration Statement and was filed electronically on June 25, 2009.

Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (617) 295-3357.


                                    Very truly yours,


                                    /s/Thomas H. Connors

                                    Thomas H. Connors
                                    Director and Senior Counsel

cc:      Thomas Hiller, Ropes & Gray LLP
EX-10.1


   

  Exhibit 10.1

  Execution Version

  Amendment #12 to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology

    

  This Amendment #12 to the Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology (“Agreement”) is by and among THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK (“FOUNDATION”), a non-profit educational corporation existing under the laws of the State of New York, having an office located at 257 Fuller Road, Albany, New York 12203, on behalf of the Colleges of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York Polytechnic Institute; SILEVO, LLC (as successor in interest of SILEVO INC.) (“SILEVO”), a Delaware limited liability company with offices at 47700 Kato Road, Fremont, California 94538; and TESLA ENERGY OPERATIONS, INC. (“TEO”), a Delaware corporation with offices at 47700 Kato Road, Fremont, California 94538. FOUNDATION, SILEVO and TEO are each referred to hereinsometimes individually as a “Party” or, collectively, as “Parties.”

   

  Once executed by both Parties, this Amendment will be effective as of May 1, 2021. The Agreement is hereby amended solely as expressly provided in this Amendment, and nothing in the Agreement is amended by implication. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

    

  1.      Amendment to Agreement § 4.1(i)

  The beginning of the first sentence to § 4.1(i) of the Agreement is amended to replace this text:

    

  On or prior to May 31 of each year (the “Reporting Date”) during the term of the Agreement ....

    

  with the following text:

    

  On or prior to February 1 of each year (the “Reporting Date”) during the term of the Agreement ....

    

           2.      Pursuant to an extension granted by ESD on or about April 22, 2021 to the required job and investment milestones required pursuant the Agreement as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, the employment and investment commitments contained in Exhibit G are hereby deferred to the end of the year. As such, and notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the Parties agree that the Second Anniversary Milestone contained in Section 4.4 of the Agreement, as amended, and Exhibit G shall be December 31, 2021. Each subsequent Anniversary Date shall be extended accordingly to December 31 of the corresponding year.

   

   

         [Signature Page Follows]

   

    

   

  

   

  Signatures

  Each undersigned party executes this Amendment by causing its duly authorized representative to sign below. 

   

   

  The Research Foundation for the State University of New York

   

   

  By: /s/ Scott Bateman

  Printed:  Scott Bateman

  Title: RF Operations Manager

  Date: 8/26/2021

   

   

   

  Tesla Energy Operations, Inc.

   

   

  By: /s/ Yaron Klein

  Printed:  Yaron Klein

  Title: Treasurer

  Date: 8/27/2021

   

  Silevo, LLC

   

   

  By: /s/ Emmanuelle Stewart

  Printed:  Emmanuelle Stewart

  Title: Secretary

  Date: 8/26/2021
#### Robert M. JASINSKI, Petitioner, v. Sherman William AUSTIN, Respondent.

No. 77-2073.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 16, 1978.

Kessler & Jasinski, Hialeah, for petitioner.

Sherman William Austin, in pro per.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of affirmance entered by the Circuit Court of Dade County in an appeal from a final judgment of the County Court of Dade County. We have treated the proceeding before us as a petition for writ of certiorari; see *Dresner v. City of Tallahassee,*164 So.2d 208 (Fla. *8781964); *Galloway v. State,*305 So.2d 278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), and have concluded that there was no departure from the essential requirements of law. Petition for cer-tiorari is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Robert
S. Benou Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company and Marc Benou, the Chief Operating Officer, President
and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Dated: June 2, 2005                  /s/ Robert Benou
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Robert Benou
                                     Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
                                     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Dated: June 2, 2005                  /s/ Marc Benou
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Marc Benou
                                     Title: Chief Operating Officer, President
                                     and Secretary



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.


                                       13
#### J. Ed STRAUGHN, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Pierre D. THOMPSON et al., Appellees.

No. DD-416.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 7, 1978.

*949Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Willard Howatt, St. Augustine, for appellants.

Hamilton D. Upchurch, St. Augustine, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the Order of the Circuit Court, St. Johns County, holding invalid the tax assessor’s correction, under *Florida Statute*§ 197.056, of a “computer error” in Appellee’s tax bill which omitted a zero from the stated assessed value of the improvements on the property. After Appellee’s payment of the tax for 1974, the error was discovered and additional taxes were back-assessed.

We find that the action of the tax assessor was valid under the holdings of this Court and of the Florida Supreme Court in *Mills v. Korash,*249 So.2d 765 (1st DCA 1971), certiorari discharged, 263 So.2d 579 (Fla.1972).

Accordingly, the judgment below is REVERSED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
#### John Franklin HICKMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 13, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bar-tow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. We agree, however, with appellant that there is an imperfection in his sentence. The phrase “at hard labor” is improper. *Brooks*v. *State,*349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Accordingly we remand this ease for correction of the sentence. Appellant need not be present at resentencing.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Arizona 

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Arizona

$60 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

A.E.A. Federal Credit Union Yuma CDFI & MDI $ 60,000,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 8, 2021

NO. 03

- 20

- 00429

- CV

David F. Henges , Appellant

v.

Leslie Henges Dolliver, Limited Guardian of the Person and Full Guardian of the Estate for David Henges , Appellee

APPEAL FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on May 27, 2020

, appointing a

permanent gu ardian for appellant

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the

C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the C ourt aff irms the trial

court’s guardianship order

. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court

and in the court below.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of SemGroup Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert N. Fitzgerald, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  June 14, 2013

 

 
|   | By:                                                 | /s/   Robert N. Fitzgerald |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|   | Robert   N. Fitzgerald                              |
|   | Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
256 La. 906

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Willie DOMINGUE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50924.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1970.

In re: Willie Domingue applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Relator has been granted an evidentiary hearing in the district court according to that Court’s return. The writ before us is premature.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2012

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/29 4/2 4/5 41.00 33.00 30.00 25.00 121.00 8.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 4/5 4/9 4/12 37.00 31.00 29.00 97.00 0.00

4/12 4/16 4/19 34.00 29.00 28.00 97.00 -6.00

4/19 4/23 4/26 34.00 29.00 27.00 97.00 -7.00

4/26 4/30 5/3 34.00 29.00 27.00 25.00 123.00 -8.00

5/3 5/7 5/10 34.00 29.00 27.00 96.00 -6.00

5/10 5/14 5/17 34.00 29.00 27.00 94.00 -4.00

5/17 5/21 5/24 34.00 29.00 27.00 94.00 -4.00

5/24 5/29 5/31 34.00 29.00 27.00 25.00 118.00 -3.00

5/31 6/4 6/7 34.00 29.00 27.00 94.00 -4.00

6/7 6/11 6/14 34.00 29.00 27.00 94.00 -4.00

6/14 6/18 6/21 33.00 29.00 27.00 94.00 -5.00

6/21 6/25 6/28 33.00 29.00 27.00 25.00 118.00 -4.00

1290.00 1337.00 -47.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

15-DAY BILL 4/2 4/5 15.00 15.00 0.00

Matures 4/19

22-DAY BILL 4/9 4/12 15.00 15.00 0.00

Matures 5/3

49-DAY BILL Matures 4/26 10.00 -10.00

28-DAY BILL Matures 4/26 10.00 -10.00

CMB Funds: -20.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

3-year Note 4/5 4/10 4/16 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 4/5 4/11 4/16 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 4/5 4/12 4/16 13.00 0.00 40.57 25.43

5-year TIPS 4/12 4/19 4/30 14.00 0.00

2-year Note 4/19 4/24 4/30 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 4/19 4/25 4/30 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 4/19 4/26 4/30 29.00 0.00 57.35 55.65

3-year Note 5/2 5/8 5/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note 5/2 5/9 5/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 5/2 5/10 5/15 16.00 0.00 32.80 39.20

10-year TIPS ® 5/10 5/17 5/31 13.00 0.00

2-year Note 5/17 5/22 5/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 5/17 5/23 5/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 5/17 5/24 5/31 29.00 0.00 58.53 53.47

3-year Note 6/7 6/12 6/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 6/7 6/13 6/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Note ® 6/7 6/14 6/15 13.00 0.00 26.87 39.13

30-year TIPS ® 6/14 6/21 6/29 8.00 1.00

2-year Note 6/21 6/26 7/2 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 6/21 6/27 7/2 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 6/21 6/28 7/2 29.00 0.00 53.13 53.88

536.00 269.25 266.75

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 199.75
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                         7,763
<SECURITIES>                                   51,272
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,632
<INVENTORY>                                    20,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,263
<PP&E>                                         40,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          50,984
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       85,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,994
<SALES>                                        155,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,858
<CGS>                                          64,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            16,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   16,768
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .76


</TABLE>
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00090-CR

LARRY THOMAS CHAMBERS, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 277th District Court

Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-068-K277

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal was filed July 25, 2018, and the clerk’s record was filed 

August 9, 2018, making the appellant’s brief originally due September 10, 2018. This Court 

extended that briefing deadline twice, on appellant’s motions, resulting in the most recent due date 

of October 31, 2018. We informed counsel when we granted the last extension request that further 

requests for extension of time would not be granted. Counsel has filed a third motion seeking an 

additional nine-day extension of the briefing deadline.

Counsel advised the Court in his most recent motion that there was an unexpected death in 

his family that required him to be out of the State. While we are not unsympathetic to counsel’s 

situation, we are also mindful of our responsibility to ensure that this appeal proceeds in a timely 

manner. Consequently, we deny counsel’s third motion to extend the deadline to file the appellate 

brief in this matter and order counsel to file Chambers’ appellate brief on or before November 9, 

2018. This gives counsel the nine days he requested in his motion, which we are confident will be 

adequate.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

BY THE COURT

Date: November 7, 2018
Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Connecticut Light and Power
Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W.
Grise, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and John H. Forsgren,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a)  or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Cheryl W. Grise
    (Signature)
    Cheryl W. Grise
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

August 6, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and
will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.