alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5

6

m

3

)

Tacoma South L St. PMF Results

 Soil Attribution (Every 6th day)

Soil Attribution (30 day ave )

45

F 'Soil' (μg/mSoil Attribution (30 day ave.)

3

outh L PMF

12

Tacoma S

1/1/2007 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011

0

D t a e

• These are model results using the Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) source apportionment mod

http://www.epa.gov/heasd/products/pmf/pmf.html

• Monitoring data used as inputs to the PMF model is available at http://views.cira.colostate.edu/w• Tacoma South L St. PMF results for ‘Soil’ = all fugitive dust that would mostly be made up of crust

Al, Si, Ca, Ti). This would potentially include wind blown soil, road dust, construction dust, coal tra

other industrial fugitive dust.• No increasing trend from 2008 to ~ mid 2011.
Treasury approves Kentucky’s plan to invest $179.1 million of CPF funding 

in broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet 

to locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Kentucky

 

▪ Program Summary: $179.1 million for Broadband Infrastructure (100% of program 

allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 45,000 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: The Kentucky Broadband

Deployment Fund (BDF) is a competitive grant program

designed to provide affordable, reliable broadband service

to locations that currently have no internet service,

followed by areas that currently lack access to internet at

speeds of 25/3 Mbps. The program aims to enable funding

to reach rural areas of the Commonwealth that are hardest to serve. 

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

▪ Key State Contact: The Kentucky Office of Broadband Deployment (KOBD)

Kentucky Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Kentucky, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~16% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97N-0265]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Investigational Device Exemptions 
Reports and Records--21 CFR 812'' has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(the PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret R. Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 16, 1997 (62 
FR 38097), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 
section 3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507). An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 
OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB 
control number 0910-0078. The approval expires on September 30, 2000.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-32081 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Order entered December 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00874-CV

TERESA WARD COOPER, ET AL., Appellants

V.

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02287-A

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ December 1, 2015 unopposed second motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by MONDAY, JANUARY 4, 2016. We caution 

appellants that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 of Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries of our reports dated September 12, 2012, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended June 30, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, which reports appear in the June 30, 2012 annual report on Form 10-K of Oritani Financial Corp. andsubsidiaries. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

ShortHills, New Jersey 

September 12, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207.

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, December 18, 1997 10:00 a.m.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:

Upholstered Furniture

    The staff will brief the Commission on options for Commission 
action to address the risk of fires caused by small open flame ignition 
of upholstered furniture and the staff's evaluation of the cigarette 
ignition resistance of upholstered furniture. These issues were 
initially raised in a petition (FP 93-1) submitted by the National 
Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM).
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32210 Filed 12-4-97; 2:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00300-CR

GABRIEL DWAIN HALL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-804-C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The jury convicted Gabriel Hall of the offense of aggravated assault and assessed 

punishment at forty years confinement. We affirm.

Hall’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in 

support of the motion stating that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and 

that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 
Hall v. State Page 2

Counsel's brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and compliance 

with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel performed the 

duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. at 744; High v. 

State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 

407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the 

proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." See Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. at 744; see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 

503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" 

when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10 

(1988). After a review of the entire record in this appeal, we determine the appeal to be 

wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Hall is granted.

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Affirmed; motion granted

Opinion delivered and filed March 23, 2020

Do not publish 

[CRPM]
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Benou
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The
 Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|                         |                                                    
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 30, 2010 | /s/ Robert S. Benou                                
|                         |                                                    
|                         | Robert S. Benou                                    
|                         | Chairman, Chief Executive
 Officer, Chief Financial
|                         | Officer and Treasurer                              

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
in such filing.



---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-241-000]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 30, 1997, Viking Gas Transmission 
Company (Viking) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet proposed to be 
effective October 1, 1996:

Second Revised Sheet No. 36

    Viking states that the purpose of this filing is to modify Section 
6(d) of Viking's Rate Schedule LMS to provide that Viking's Rate 
Schedule FT-B service receives the treatment already accorded to 
Viking's Rate Schedules FT-A, FT-GS, IT and AOT service with regard to 
the disposition of monthly imbalance penalties. Viking inadvertently 
omitted to modify Sheet No. 36 of Rate Schedule LMS to make FT-B 
shippers eligible for Section 6(d) penalty revenue credits when it 
filed to implement the new Rate Schedule FT-B on September 13, 1996.
    Viking proposes an effective date of October 1, 1996 to coincide 
with the effective date of the original FT-B filing in Docket No. RP96-
384.
    Viking states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all of 
its jurisdictional customers and to affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding.
    Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3039 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Junior Cleveland RICHBURG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 16, 1971.

Junior Cleveland Richburg, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Greene v. State, 237 So.2d 46 (Fla.App. 1st 1970).

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32144]



[[Page 64824]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-2-43-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 26, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing the following tariff sheets to its FERC Gas 
Tariff, to be effective January 1, 1998:

Second Revised Volume No. 1

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 6B

Original Volume No. 2

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 362

    WNG states that this filing is being made pursuant to Article 13 of 
the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff to reflect 
revised fuel and loss reimbursement percentages. The percentages are 
based on actual fuel and loss for the twelve months ended September 30, 
1997.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32144 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 21
 Subsidiaries of Registrant
 State of
    
    Percentage ofCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    OwnershipCICA Life Insurance Company of America (CICA)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% DirectCitizens National Life Insurance Company (CNLIC)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectComputing Technology, Inc. (CTI)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% IndirectFuneral Homes of America, Inc. (FHA)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectInsurance Investors, Inc. (III)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectIntegrity Capital Corporation (ICC)
    
    Indiana
    
    100% DirectIntegrity Capital Insurance Company (ICIC)
    
    Indiana
    
    100% IndirectOzark National Life Insurance Company (ONLIC)
    
    Arkansas
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Life Insurance Company (SPLIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Fire Insurance Company (SPFIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% Indirect
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2007

- 0218 Directorate Identifier: 92

- ANE

- 56

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cos t ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
4 cyl inspection 0.2 $ 17.00 $ 17.00 21,180 $360,060.00 6 cyl inspection 0.5 $ 42.50 $ 42.50 21,449 $911,582.50 8 cyl inspection 0.7 $ 59.50 $ 59.50 256 $15,232.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,286,875 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warrant y costs) 

### :

### The final rule total cost estimate has been reduced by $85,770 from the total cost estimate in the

proposed AD, which published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2011 (76 FR 8661) . The proposed AD total cost estimate included a $2 cost per engine for parts.
**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Wil l the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to inc lude specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 208 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 500 West Main Street, Suite 102 in Tupelo, 

Mississippi, as the ‘‘Colonel Carlyle ‘Smitty’ Harris Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 208 EH

1 SECTION 1. COLONEL CARLYLE ‘‘SMITTY’’ HARRIS POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 500 West Main Street, Suite 102 

5 in Tupelo, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Colonel Carlyle ‘Smitty’ Harris Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Colonel Carlyle 

11 ‘Smitty’ Harris Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 23, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 208 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostCarlyle ‘Smitty’ Harris Post Office’’. 102 in Tupelo, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Colonel al Service located at 500 West Main Street, Suite
Exhibit 32.1.2



Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Joan S. Freilich, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, which this statement accompanies, (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    Joan S. FreilichJoan S. Freilich




Dated: November 5, 2004
### Snoden, Barbara (OSn From: 

### Sent: To:. 

### Subject:
Good Afternoon Pierre,

# -----------------~ DoJc.d"**DoT-O"::>T-;xJto/~oJLj~**

Snoden, Barbara (OST) Tuesday, April 21, 2015 4:00 PM Pierre Murphy (pmurphy@ggh-airlaw.com) Harris Air

Can you please tell me if Harris Air has drawn offtheir Business Line of Credit from First Bank? A dated confirmation on bank letterhead would be appropriate confirmation. Thank you, Barbara Barbara A. Snoden Transportation Industry Analyst US Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4834

1 •.J**~-·** 

### .:

# .,