alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2014

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/27 3/31 4/3 45.00 29.00 26.00 120.00 -20.00

3&6&12 MO 4/3 4/7 4/10 45.00 29.00 26.00 21.00 98.00 23.00

BILLS 4/10 4/14 4/17 30.00 29.00 26.00 103.00 -18.00

4/17 4/21 4/24 30.00 29.00 26.00 103.00 -18.00

4/24 4/28 5/1 30.00 29.00 26.00 126.00 -41.00

5/1 5/5 5/8 30.00 28.00 26.00 21.00 102.00 3.00

5/8 5/12 5/15 30.00 28.00 25.00 88.00 -5.00

5/15 5/19 5/22 30.00 28.00 25.00 87.00 -4.00

5/22 5/26 5/29 30.00 28.00 26.00 87.00 -3.00

5/29 6/2 6/5 30.00 28.00 25.00 20.00 112.00 -9.00

6/5 6/9 6/12 30.00 28.00 26.00 87.00 -3.00

6/12 6/16 6/19 30.00 28.00 25.00 87.00 -4.00

6/19 6/23 6/26 30.00 28.00 26.00 87.00 -3.00

1185.00 1287.00 -102.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

64-DAY BILL 2/11 2/13 40.00 -40.00

Matures 4/17

64-DAY BILL 2/18 2/20 35.00 -35.00

Matures 4/24

40-DAY BILL 2/25 2/26 35.00 -35.00

Matures 5/1

189-DAY BILL 10/16 10/17 26.00 -26.00

Matures 4/24

CMB Funds: -136.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 4/3 4/8 4/15 30.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 4/3 4/9 4/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 4/3 4/10 4/15 13.00 0.00 50.42 13.58

5-year TIPS 4/10 4/17 4/30 18.00 0.00

2-year note 4/17 4/22 4/30 32.00 0.00

5-year note 4/17 4/23 4/30 35.00 0.00

7-year note 4/17 4/24 4/30 29.00 0.00

2-year FRN 4/24 4/28 4/30 15.00 0.00 72.15 56.85

3-year Note 4/30 5/6 5/15 30.00 0.00

10-year Note 4/30 5/7 5/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 4/30 5/8 5/15 16.00 0.00 59.30 10.70

10-year TIPS ® 5/15 5/22 5/31 13.00 0.00

2-year note 5/22 5/27 5/31 31.00 -1.00

5-year note 5/22 5/28 5/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 5/22 5/29 5/31 29.00 0.00

2-year FRN® 5/22 5/28 5/31 10.00 0.00 71.17 46.83

3-year Note 6/5 6/10 6/16 29.00 -1.00

10-year Note ® 6/5 6/11 6/16 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 6/5 6/12 6/16 13.00 0.00 32.00 31.00

2-year note 6/19 6/24 6/30 30.00 -1.00

5-year note 6/19 6/25 6/30 35.00 0.00

7-year note 6/19 6/26 6/30 29.00 0.00

30-year TIPS ® 6/12 6/19 6/30 7.00 -6.00

2-year FRN® 6/19 6/25 6/27 10.00 0.00 73.43 37.57

555.00 358.48 196.52

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: -41
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 30561 Summary Calendar

Kevin Kaigler,

Plaintiff

— Appellant ,

versus

James M. LeBlanc; Darryl Vannoy; Shirley Coody; Joseph Lamartimiere; Butch H. Browning; Jimmy Guidry,

Defendants

— Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:18

- CV

- 350

Before Jones, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Kevin Kaigler, Louisiana prisoner # 5566932 , seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against various prison and state

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cu it R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 2, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-30561 Document: 00516078223 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/02/2021No. 20

- 30561

2 officials alleging he is being subjected to unsafe and unsanitary conditions of confinement, for failure to state a claim. By moving to pro c eed IFP, Kaigler is challenging the distri ct court’s certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our inquiry into Kaigler ’s good faith “ is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points a rguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous) .” Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and
citation s omitted).
Kaigler challenges only the district court’s conclusion that he failed to state that any of the def

endants knew of the complained of conditions. He
fails to address an y of the other conclusions reached by the district court and, otherwise, makes only conclusional statements in support of his argument that the district court erred in dismissing his comp laint. Thus, the appeal lacks arguable merit. See Howard , 707 F.2d at 220.
Accordingly, Kaigler’s IFP motion is DENIED , and the appeal is

DISMISSED as frivolous

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2; Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202
n.24. The district court’s dismissal of Kai gler’s complain t and our dismissal of this appeal count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Coleman v. Tollefson , 575 U.S. 532, 537 (2015) . Kaigler is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be allowed to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is detained or incarcerated in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Case: 20-30561 Document: 00516078223 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/02/2021
#### Jack MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-10.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1970.

Harvey S. Swickle, of Jack R. Nageley Law Offices, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have thoroughly reviewed each of the fifteen points presented for our review by the appellant’s brief and the pertinent portions of the record. On the basis thereof we are of the opinion that no error has been demonstrated by the appellant. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT10.142**

**FIFTHAMENDMENT****TO THE****2000 EQUITY INCENTIVE****OF****COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION****(Amended and Restated Effective June 16, 2004)**

**WHEREAS**, the CompensationCommittee of the Board of Directors of Countrywide Financial Corporation (the “**Company**”) has determined that it is in thebest interest of the Company to amend the Countrywide Financial Corporation2000 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective June 16, 2004(the “**2000 Plan**”), to amend thedefinition of “Fair Market Value” to conform to certain revised rules of theSecurities and Exchange Commission;

**NOW THEREFORE**, the 2000 Plan isamended effective as of January 1, 2007, in the following particulars:

# 1.             Section 2.2(a) is hereby deleted in its entirety and newSection 2.2(a) is inserted in its place as follows (with the revised languagereflected below in italics):

### “(a)         to prescribe, amendand rescind rules and regulations relating to this Plan (including but notlimited to, correcting any defect or supplying any omission, or reconciling anyinconsistency in the Plan or any Award Document (as defined below)) in themanner and to the extent it shall be deemed necessary or advisable so that thePlan complies with applicable law including Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Actand the Code to the extent applicable and otherwise to make the Plan fullyeffective, and to define terms not otherwise defined herein; provided that,unless the Committee shall specify otherwise, for purposes of this Plan (i) theterm “**Fair Market Value**” shall, onany date, mean the *officially-quoted closingselling price of the Shares*on such date on the principal nationalsecurities exchange on which such Shares are listed or admitted to trading *(including the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. orsuch other market or exchange in which such prices are regularly quoted)*or,if there have been no *sales* withrespect to Shares on such date, the Fair Market Value shall be the valueestablished by the Board in good faith and in accordance with Code Section 422;and (ii) the term “Company” shall mean the Company and its Subsidiaries (assuch term is defined in Code Section 424(f)) and affiliates, unless the contextotherwise requires;”

**[THENEXT PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE]**

----

**INWITNESS WHEREOF,** the Company has caused this Fifth Amendmentto be executed by its duly authorized officer this 30th day of November, 2006.
|        | Countrywide Financial Corporation |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |                              |   |
|   |                              |   |
|   | By:                               | /s/ Marshall M. Gates |
|   |                              | Marshall Gates |
|   |                              | Senior Managing Director, |
|   |                              | Chief Administrative Officer |

 

2

----
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                               Twelve Months Ended
                             (Thousands of Dollars)


                                                SEPTEMBER            SEPTEMBER
                                                     1998                 1997
                                                ---------            ---------

Earnings
 Net Income                                      $750,768             $689,359
 Federal Income Tax                               340,991              325,970
 Federal Income Tax Deferred                       70,620               54,820
 Investment Tax Credits Deferred                   (8,740)              (8,730)
                                               ----------           ----------

    Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax    1,153,639            1,061,419

Fixed Charges*                                    352,441              348,199
                                               ----------           ----------


    Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax
      and Fixed Charges                        $1,506,080           $1,409,618
                                               ==========           ==========




* Fixed Charges

 Interest on Long-Term Debt                      $299,387             $304,299
 Amort. of Debt Discount, Premium & Expense        13,361               11,364
 Interest on Component of Rentals                  18,346               18,301
 Other Interest                                    21,347               14,235
                                               ----------           ----------

    Total Fixed Charges                          $352,441             $348,199
                                               ==========           ==========



    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges               4.27                 4.05
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-373-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

December 5, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on December 18, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement 
of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Edith A. Gilmore at (202) 208-
2158 or Sandra J. Delude at (202) 208-0583.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32383 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
DENY and Opinion Filed November 20, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-01305-CV IN RE ERIC DRAKE, Relator Original Proceeding from th e County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-05212-C



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridge s, Osborne, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Osborne Relator Eric Drake is a vexatious liti gant subject to a prefiling order. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 11.101(a). Before the Court is rela tor’s pro se October 28, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus and November 12, 2019 amended wr it of mandamus petition: (1) directing the trial court to vacate its October 15, 2019 order of dismissal, (2) di recting the statutory county court local administrative law judge to vacate he r October 15, 2019 order and October 23, 2019 amended order denying relator permission to file the lawsuit pur suant to section 11.102 of the civil practice and remedies code, (3) directing th e district court local administrative judge to vacate his October 28, 2019 order and (4) seeking additional relief. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequa te appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co

. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceedi ng). After reviewing the petition and mandamus record, we conclude relator has not show n he is entitled to th e relief requested.–2– Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and amended writ of mandamus petition. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if court determines relator is not entitled to relief sought).

191305F.P05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63951-63952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31664]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 16, 1997.

[[Page 63952]]

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Jeffery Hirsch, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Andrew Godby, Melvin Godby, Sr., Custodian; Bill David Godby, 
David H. Godby, Custodian; Christopher L. Godby, David H. Godby, 
Custodian; The Clell Dean Godby Living Trust, Clell Dean Godby, 
Trustee; David H. Godby; Joshua H. Godby; Melodie Godby; Melvin M. 
Godby, Sr.; Melvin M. Godby, Jr.; Vicki Godby; Clellan Prewitt; and 
Leora Prewitt, all of Somerset, Kentucky; to acquire voting shares of 
First Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Somerset, Kentucky, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Cumberland Security Bank, Inc., Somerset, Kentucky.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Jack L. Grimmett, Jr. and Robert B. Grimmett, Pauls Valley, 
Oklahoma; to acquire voting shares of Valley Bancshares, Inc., Pauls 
Valley, Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly acquire Pauls Valley National 
Bank, Pauls Valley, Oklahoma.
    2. Alan C. Porter, Chester Nebraska; Warren V. Porter, Houston, 
Texas; and Timothy H. Porter, Olathe, Kansas; to acquire voting shares 
of Chester Insurance Agency, Inc., Chester, Nebraska, and thereby 
indirectly acquire State Bank of Chester, Chester, Nebraska.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Western Bank, Las Cruces, Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Western 
Bank, Bruce Streett, Samuel Goldman, and Kelly Dunn, Trustees, all of 
Las Cruces New Mexico; to acquire voting shares of Western Bancshares 
of Las Cruces, Inc., Carlsbad, New Mexico, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Western Bank, Las Cruces, New Mexico.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 26, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-31664 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
# Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 March 4, 2009 Secretary

717-787-2814 Mr. William T. Wisniewski Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Wisniewski: Enclosed for your approval
is a revision to Pennsylvania’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning amendments
to the Pennsylvania Consumer Products and Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings Regulations. The submittal includes three copies of a final rulemaking that amends 25 Pa. Code Chapter 130, Subchapters

B and C (relating to consumer products; and architectural and industrial maintenance coatings) The amendments

to Subchapter B amend the Table of Standards to add volatile organic compound (VOC) content limits for an additional
11 categories of consumer products and revise the VOC content limits for one category of consumer products currently regulated. The amendments
to Subchapter

B also include definitions for approximately
30 new terms, including terms that relate to the new regulated product categories, and revised definitions for approximately
75 existing terms to provide clarity. The amendments add the term “VOC-volatile organic compound”
to Subchapter B and revise the definition of the term in Subchapter

C to mirror the definition of the term in 25 Pa. Code



# §

121.1 (relating to definitions). The definition of the term “VOC-volatile organic compound”
in 

# §

121.1 refers to the Federal definition of VOC. This SIP revision submission includes the final rulemaking published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin on October 11, 2008 (38 Pa.B. 5598), documentation
of the public participation process including proof of public notice and the Department’s comment and response document.., Should you have any questions regarding this SIP revision, please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau of Air Quality, by e-mail at jeepps@state.pa.us

or by telephone
at 717-787-9702.

Sin erely, Acting Secretary Enclosure An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us

Printed on Recycled Paper

# J



# Th



# )
<Page>

                                                                  Exhibit 99.3.1

Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Stephen B. Bram, the Chief Executive Officer of Orange and Rockland
Utilities, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, which this
statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                  /s/ Stephen B. Bram
                                                  --------------------
                                                  Stephen B. Bram

Dated: November 13, 2002
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               APR-30-1998             APR-30-1998
[CASH]                                       1,389,960               1,389,960
[SECURITIES]                                         0                       0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  143,777                 143,777
[ALLOWANCES]                                   (6,000)                 (6,000)
[INVENTORY]                                  3,676,947               3,676,947
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             5,255,055               5,255,055
[PP&E]                                       2,390,414               2,390,414
[DEPRECIATION]                             (1,981,052)             (1,981,052)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               5,670,227               5,670,227
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          159,475                 159,475
[BONDS]                                              0                       0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0                       0
[PREFERRED]                                     78,097                  78,097
[COMMON]                                     3,686,071               3,686,071
[OTHER-SE]                                   1,746,584               1,746,584
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 5,670,227               5,670,227
[SALES]                                        276,071                 629,688
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               276,071                 629,688
[CGS]                                           50,353                 215,049
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   50,353                 215,049
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               194,433                 552,949
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0                       0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                  12                  22,459
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 31,273               (160,769)
[INCOME-TAX]                                     2,142                   4,402
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             29,131               (165,171)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0                       0
[CHANGES]                                            0                       0
[NET-INCOME]                                    29,131               (165,171)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                        0                  (0.04)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0                  (0.04)
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

MANSFIELD HELIFLIGHT, INC.



### v. CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT Complainant,

Respondent. FAA DocketNo. 16-14-06

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above
referenced complaint, filed in accordance with 

### FAA Rules ofPracticefor Federally-Assisted 

### AirportEnforcement Proceedings, 14 CFRPart 16. Pursuant to 14 CFRPart 16, subpart B , the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to April 11, 20 16. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case. 

# 1?/o//s Date

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December ____1l_, 2015 , I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe foregoing document addressed to: FOR RESPONDENT Pablo 0 . Nuesch Anjali G. Patel Spiegel and McDiarmid, LLP 1875 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 FOR COMPLAINANT Benjamin H. Klein The Klein Law Firm, LLC 61 Broadway, Suite 2125 New York, NY 10006 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-600 FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0-100



# ~ Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
#### Joe COBB, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-652.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 24, 1969.

Habeas corpus denied.