alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**839 KA 14-01533** 
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RAYSEAN GOSS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CAITLIN M. CONNELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered June 24, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts each of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1], [12]) and criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (§ 220.50 [2], [3]). Defendant’s conviction stems from the seizure of cocaine and drug paraphernalia during a search of his residence conducted by parole officers and police officers. Defendant’s parole officer testified at the suppression hearing that he made the determination to search defendant’s residence based on defendant’s recent parole violations and the fact that, despite being unemployed, on one occasion he possessed a large sum of cash ( see People v Maynard , 67 AD3d 1391, 1391, lv denied 14 NY3d 890). We agree with Supreme Court that the search was “rationally and reasonably related to the performance of the parole officer’s duty” ( People v Huntley , 43 NY2d 175, 181; see People v Escalera , 121 AD3d 1519, 1520, lv denied 24 NY3d 1083). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the fact that another parole officer and police officers assisted defendant’s parole officer during the search did not render it a police operation ( see People v Adams , 126 AD3d 1405, 1405-1406, lv denied 25 NY3d 1158). Defendant’s remaining contentions regarding the search of his residence were not raised in his motion papers or before the suppression court and are therefore not preserved for our review ( see generally People v Schluter , 136 AD3d 1363, 1363, lv denied 27 NY3d**-2- 839 KA 14-01533** 

1138; People v Fuentes , 52 AD3d 1297, 1298, lv denied 11 NY3d 736). We decline to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). Finally, the period of postrelease supervision is not unduly harsh or severe ( see People v Singer , 104 AD3d 1311, 1312).

Entered: October 7, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63959-63960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 12, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), the Petroleum 
Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and with the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing a change in its membership. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, the notifications stated that Sun Company, 
Inc., has terminated its membership in PERF.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of PERF. Membership in PERF remains open, and PERF intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On February 10, 1986, PERF filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 15, 
1996. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the

[[Page 63960]]

Act on March 27, 1996 (61 FR 13517-18).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-31721 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Don MEIKELJOHN v. CARBO, INC.

No. 38250.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 217 So.2d 159.
#### SUCCESSION of Earl D. FALGOUT.

No. 53220.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 15, 1973.

In re: Mrs. Helen Squires Falgout applying for writ of certiorari and/or review.

Granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable S. Sanford Levy, Judge of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 7th day of May, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
Exhibit 31.4 

 

I, Scott Forbes, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Texas-New Mexico Power Company; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and as presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and; 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32209]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207.

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, December 16, 1997, 10:00 a.m.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:

Bunk Beds

    The staff will brief the Commission on options for Commission 
action to address entrapment hazards associated with bunk beds.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32209 Filed 12-4-97; 2:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
Exhibit 8.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Wholly-owned subsidiaries



|                                                 |  |                                   
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------
|Name of entity                                   |  | Place of incorporation            
|1. Surplus International Investments Limited     |  | Hong Kong                         
|2. Liaoning Nuokang Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |  | Peoples Republic of China (PRC)
|3. Shenyang Shouzheng Bio-Technology Co., Ltd.   |  | PRC                               
|4. Penglai Nuokang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.      |  | PRC                               
|5. Liaoning Nuokang Medicines Co., Ltd.          |  | PRC                               

Non-wholly owned subsidiaries



|                              |  |                       
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name of entity                |  | Place of incorporation
|1. Venomics Hong Kong Limited |  | Hong Kong
EXHIBIT 12



CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)



_____________________________________________________________________________
Twelve Months to March 31                                              1998
_____________________________________________________________________________
Earnings:
  Income from continuing operations.........................         $283,913
  Add income taxes..........................................          139,528
                                                                     ________
    Income from continuing operations
    before income taxes.....................................          423,441
  Distributed income from unconsolidated investees,
    less equity in earnings thereof.........................             (152)
                                                                     ________
    Subtotal................................................          423,289
                                                                     ________

  Add fixed charges:
    Interest on long-term debt, including amortization
      of debt discount and expense less premium.............          106,715
    Other interest expense..................................            5,977
    Portion of rentals deemed to be representative
      of the interest factor................................            9,580
    Fixed charges associated with 50% projects with debt....            1,934
                                                                     ________
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES.........................................          124,206
                                                                     ________
TOTAL EARNINGS..............................................         $547,495
                                                                     ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES..........................             4.41
                                                                     ========
_____________________________________________________________________________
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Esteban RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Steve Rodriguez, Respondent.

No. 42006.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 11, 1973.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District (257 So.2d 81), which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this Court and of the District Courts of Appeal of the State on the same point of law. We have examined the decisions involved and determined that there is conflict and that we have jurisdiction pursuant to Fla.Const., art. V, § 3(b)(3), F.S.A.

The District Court of Appeal relied upon its decision in Anderson v. State, 255 So.2d 550 (Fla.App.2d, 1971), to reverse the trial court and order a new trial because Rodriguez, who had been convicted of aiding or assisting in the running of a lottery, had been denied a requested instruction on possession of lottery paraphernalia. The reasoning relied upon by the District Court of Appeal has been specifically rejected by this Court in quashing the decision of the District Court of Appeal in Anderson v. State, *supra.*See State v. Anderson, 270 So.2d 353 (Fla.1973).

Accordingly, the opinion of the District Court of Appeal is quashed and this cause *6is remanded to the District Court of Appeal for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

McCAIN, J., dissents.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Nazmudin Keshwani, M.D., Elite Doc Family Medicine, 

P.L.L.C., and Elite Doc Health & Beauty P.L.L.C.

Appellate case number: 01-16-00286-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-21963

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County

Relators, Nazmudin Keshwani, M.D., Elite Doc Family Medicine, P.L.L.C., and Elite 

Doc Health & Beauty P.L.L.C., have filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial 

court’s April 7, 2016 Temporary Restraining Order and Order Setting Hearing for Temporary 

Injunction. Relators have also filed a motion for emergency stay, seeking a stay of the April 7, 

2016 order.

We order real parties in interest, Med-Cure Anti-Aging & Skin Care, P.A. and Med-Cure 

Primary Care Physicians, P.A., to file a response to the relator’s motion for emergency stay 

before 5 p.m. Monday, April 11, 2016.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 8, 2016
U.S. Position on World Bank’s investment in 

Clean Air Through Greening Residential Heating Project in Poland

December 8, 2021

The United States supports this operation for thermal renovations and non-coal boiler 

replacements in order to improve air quality, contributing to Poland’s Nationally Determined 

Contribution. The United States looks forward to lessons learned for de-carbonizing residential 

heating and cooling around the world.

The United States is reviewing all MDB projects with the goal of ending international financing 

of carbon-intensive fossil fuel-based energy while simultaneously advancing sustainable 

development and a green recovery. The United States is committed to supporting developing 

countries to achieve a clean and sustainable future that is consistent with their development goals 

and the goals of the Paris Agreement. The MDBs should prioritize clean energy, innovation, and 

energy efficiency and should only consider fossil fuels if other options are unfeasible.

In this case, the United States recognizes the importance of improving residential heating 

systems as a critical element of Poland’s efforts to address the needs of its citizens. The United 

States is reviewing residential heating projects on a case-by-case basis and appreciates the efforts 

made in this case to incentivize away from biomass, such as wood, or coal. The United States 

will continue to review residential heating carefully and will expect all efforts to be made at the 

MDBs to help ensure that fossil fuel usage is extremely limited, well measured, and is consistent 

with Paris alignment.
TS-ASLT40/50

Attachment #9

Pt. 2, Sec. B

Additional Information on the Absence of Tank Truck Cleaning Operations at Road

Construction Sites
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Thomas A. Franza, Chief Executive Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                         |  | 
|------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: June 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Thomas A. Franza    |  | 
|                    |  | Thomas A. Franza        |  | 
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2016

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 6/30 7/5 7/7 40.00 34.00 28.00 94.00 8.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 7/7 7/11 7/14 45.00 34.00 28.00 94.00 13.00

7/14 7/18 7/21 50.00 36.00 29.00 20.00 121.00 14.00

7/21 7/25 7/28 50.00 36.00 30.00 98.00 18.00

7/28 8/1 8/4 55.00 36.00 30.00 98.00 23.00

8/4 8/8 8/11 55.00 36.00 30.00 103.00 18.00

8/11 8/15 8/18 55.00 34.00 30.00 25.00 135.00 9.00

8/18 8/22 8/25 50.00 34.00 28.00 110.00 2.00

8/25 8/29 9/1 45.00 34.00 28.00 115.00 -8.00

9/1 9/6 9/8 40.00 34.00 28.00 115.00 -13.00

9/8 9/12 9/15 35.00 32.00 28.00 20.00 133.00 -18.00

9/15 9/19 9/22 35.00 32.00 26.00 106.00 -13.00

9/22 9/26 9/30 35.00 32.00 26.00 75.00 18.00

1468.00 1397.00 71.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 7/7 7/12 7/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 7/7 7/13 7/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 7/7 7/14 7/15 12.00 0.00 51.86 4.15

10-year TIPS 7/14 7/21 7/29 13.00 -2.00 0.00 13.00

2-year note 7/21 7/25 8/1 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 7/21 7/28 8/1 15.00 0.00

5-year note 7/21 7/26 8/1 34.00 0.00

7-year note 7/21 7/28 8/1 28.00 0.00 127.56 -24.56

3-year Note 8/3 8/9 8/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note 8/3 8/10 8/15 23.00 0.00

30-year Bond 8/3 8/11 8/15 15.00 0.00 48.21 13.79

5-year TIPS (r) 8/11 8/18 8/31 14.00 -2.00

2-year FRN (r) 8/18 8/24 8/26 13.00 0.00

2-year note 8/18 8/23 8/31 26.00 0.00

5-year note 8/18 8/24 8/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 8/18 8/25 8/31 28.00 0.00 86.93 28.07

3-year Note 9/8 9/12 9/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 9/8 9/13 9/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 9/8 9/14 9/15 12.00 0.00 31.00 25.00

2-year FRN (r) 9/22 9/28 9/30 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

10-year TIPS (r) 9/15 9/22 9/30 11.00 0.00

2-year note 9/22 9/27 9/30 26.00 0.00

5-year note 9/22 9/28 9/30 34.00 0.00

7-year note 9/22 9/29 9/30 28.00 0.00 87.78 11.22

517.00 433.34 83.67

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 155
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Name of SEP: Iatorgenic Causes of Cancer.
    Date: February 18-20, 1997.
    Time: 7:00 pm--February 18; 8:00 am--February 19 and 20.
    Place: Sheraton Grande Hotel, 333 Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, 
California 90071.
    Contact Person: Ray Bramhall, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 636, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, Telephone: 301/496-3428.
    Purpose/Agenda To Evaluate and review grant applications.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Name of SEP: NCI Cancer Education Grant Program.
    Date: March 5, 1997.
    Time: 5:00 pm
    Place: Holiday Inn Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: John L. Meyer, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 611C, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, Telephone: 301/496-7721.
    Purpose/Agenda To evaluate and review grant applications.

    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support, 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: February 4, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
NIH Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3213 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M