alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2235 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2235

     To reauthorize the Northern Rio Grande National Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

 Ms. Leger Fernandez introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reauthorize the Northern Rio Grande National Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northern Rio Grande National 
Heritage Area Reauthorization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NORTHERN RIO GRANDE NATIONAL HERITAGE 
              AREA.

    Section 208 of the Northern Rio Grande National Heritage Area Act 
(54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 109-338; 120 Stat. 1790) is amended 
by striking ``15 years'' and inserting ``30 years''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Harrison *v.*Watkins for Use, Appellant.

*88Argued November 23, 1933.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld and James, JJ.

*Maurice A. Granatoor,*and with him *Abraham J. Levinson,*for appellant.

*Albert M. Cohen,*for appellee.

February 1, 1934:

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

Herman M. Watkins secured a judgment against Edith Mae Cardamone, under which he issued an attachment, summoning the Chelten Title and Trust Company as garnishee. The court below, on petition of the garnishee, authorized it to pay the funds attached into court; and ordered that an issue be framed to determine the right thereto, in which Joseph Harrison, the claimant of the fund, was made plaintiff, and Herman M. Watkins, for use of Misha M. Watkins, the assignee of the judgment, defendant

The Chelten Title and Trust Company consented to lend Edith M. Cardamone a certain sum of money, to *89be secured by a mortgage. The amount agreed to be loaned was not sufficient to pay the then existing encumbrances on the property to be mortgaged and it became necessary for her to deposit additional funds to complete the settlement. It was’admitted in the pleadings that Harrison deposited with the Chelten Title and Trust Company his check in the sum of $489.10 to effect the settlement, which was to have been made on April 21, 1931. On April 18th, the trust company was notified by the appellant’s attorney of the existence of her judgment. As the money in the trust company’s hands was insufficient to pay this additional lien, the settlement was not consummated. Harrison thereupon demanded the return of his money. The funds were not credited to Edith M. Cardamone, nor were they subject to her disposition or control. Mr. Brenner, assistant title officer of the trust company, said that they were not credited to any particular individual, but to a settlement account identified by a number. Mr. Green, an employee of the trust company, who apparently had knowledge "of the transaction, testified, without an objection, that the deposit slip was in the name of Harrison and that the funds were credited to him. The prima facie presumption is that a fund thus deposited belongs to the person in whose name it has been credited: Egbert v. Payne, 99 Pa. 239; Qualter’s Est., 147 Pa. 124, 23 A. 348. The defendant chose not to attempt a contradiction of this testimony.

The appellant complained, also, of the sustaining of an objection to a hypothetical question asked Mr. Green as to the practice of the trust company’s returning money to parties depositing it if settlement was not completed. The question as framed did not accurately state or sufficiently embrace the facts adduced in this case. The court, therefore, very properly sustained the objection.

*90The trial judge found as a fact on sufficient competent evidence “that the funds deposited by Harrison were his property and that at no time did the title pass from him.” That disposed of the issues' of fact. We find no reason advanced that warrants a disturbance of his finding.

Judgment is affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melissa Leigh BIRD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-30001.

D.C. No. CR-99-00031-005.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 19, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Melissa Leigh Bird appeals the 97-month sentence imposed following her conviction by guilty plea for one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1) and 21 U.S.C. § 846; one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841; and one count of use of a hand gun in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Bird contends that the district court committed error by including her juvenile convictions in its calculation of her criminal history score. Specifically, Bird argues *868that inclusion of her juvenile convictions violates the Sentencing Commission’s statutory directive to remove sentencing disparity pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 991(b)(1)(B). Because this objection was not raised before the sentencing court, we review for plain error, *see United States v. Payne,*944 F.2d 1458, 1463 (9th Cir.1991), and find none.

For each of the drug trafficking counts to which she pleaded guilty, Bird was exposed to a 120 month minimum sentence. Because the district court departed downward and sentenced Bird to only 37 months for each drug trafficking violation, well below the guideline range even for a defendant with a criminal history score of I, Bird cannot show that her substantial rights were affected by the district court’s calculation of her criminal history score. *See United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5964-5965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-5-002]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 30, 1997, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to 
the filing, to become effective April 1, 1997.
    Algonquin states that this filing is made in compliance with Order 
No. 587 and the Commission's Order, issued in Docket No. RP97-5-000 on 
November 15, 1996.
    Algonquin states that these tariff sheets reflect the modifications 
required by the November 15, 1996 Order, as well as the requirements of 
Order No. 587 that interstate pipelines follow standardized procedures 
for critical business practices-nominations, flowing gas (allocations, 
balancing, and measurement) invoicing, and capacity release. Algonquin 
requests that the Commission grant any waiver that may be necessary to 
place these tariff sheets into effect on the date requested.
    Algonquin states that copies of this filing were mailed to all 
customers of Algonquin and interested state

[[Page 5965]]

commissions, and all parties on the RP97-5-000 service list.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before 
February 20, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3151 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO ANDCFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Choice Bancorp (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on the date hereof (the Report), Stanley G. Leedle, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Bank, and John F. Glynn, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the period covered by the report.



CHOICE BANCORP

Date:  March 30, 2011

By: /s/ Stanley G. Leedle

Stanley G. Leedle

Interim President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 30, 2011

By: /s/ John F. Glynn

John F. Glynn

Chief Financial Officer
#### Lael N. BATCHELOR, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Mead W. Batchelor, Deceased, Appellant, v. NATIONAL BANK OF MELBOURNE AND TRUST COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 73-265.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas-New Mexico Power Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack V. Chambers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jack V. Chambers   
|Jack V. Chambers       
|Chief Executive Officer

May 3, 2005
EXHIBIT 31 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Ruth Shepley, President, certify that: I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K of DE ACQUISITION 6, INC.;  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Ruth Shepley Ruth Shepley, President May 17, 2011
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Benou
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|                       |  |                                           | 
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: March
 22, 2010 |  | /s/ Robert
 S. Benou                      | 
|                       |  |                                           | 
|                       |  | Robert S.
 Benou                          | 
|                       |  | Chairman,
 Chief Executive Officer, Chief | 
|                       |  | Financial
 Officer and Treasurer          | 

The foregoing certification is
being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Countrywide Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angelo R. Mozilo, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ Angelo R. MoziloAngelo R. Mozilo
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
November 9, 2007 |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Countrywide Financial Corporation and will be retained by Countrywide Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 25, 2012

p0118 

# Order

January 25, 2012

143693

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143693 COA: 298172 Oakland CC: 09-227243-FH BARRETT RAY SCHWARZLOSE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 11, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2017

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/30 4/4 4/6 55.00 39.00 33.00 85.00 42.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 4/6 4/11 4/13 55.00 39.00 33.00 125.00 2.00

4/13 4/18 4/20 55.00 39.00 33.00 125.00 2.00

4/20 4/25 4/27 60.00 39.00 33.00 20.00 145.00 7.00

4/27 5/2 5/4 55.00 39.00 33.00 125.00 2.00

5/4 5/9 5/11 50.00 39.00 33.00 125.00 -3.00

5/11 5/16 5/18 45.00 38.00 32.00 125.00 -10.00

5/18 5/23 5/25 45.00 38.00 32.00 20.00 147.00 -12.00

5/25 5/30 6/1 45.00 38.00 32.00 119.00 -4.00

6/1 6/6 6/8 45.00 38.00 32.00 108.00 7.00

6/8 6/13 6/15 40.00 38.00 32.00 109.00 1.00

6/15 6/20 6/22 40.00 38.00 32.00 20.00 132.00 -2.00

6/22 6/27 6/29 40.00 38.00 32.00 112.00 -2.00

1612.00 1582.00 30.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

35-DAY CMB 3/16 45.00 -45.00

Matures 4/20

33-DAY CMB

Matures 4/27 3/14 33.00 -33.00

CMB Funds: -78.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 4/6 4/10 4/17 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 4/6 4/11 4/17 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 4/6 4/12 4/17 12.00 0.00 77.06 -21.06

5-year TIPS 4/13 4/20 4/28 16.00 0.00 0.00 16.00

2-year note 4/20 4/25 5/1 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 4/20 4/26 5/1 15.00 0.00

5-year note 4/20 4/26 5/1 34.00 0.00

7-year note 4/20 4/27 5/1 28.00 0.00 121.71 -18.71

3-year Note 5/3 5/9 5/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note 5/3 5/10 5/15 23.00 0.00

30-year Bond 5/3 5/11 5/15 15.00 0.00 49.66 12.34

2-year FRN (r) 5/18 5/24 5/26 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

10-year TIPS (r) 5/11 5/18 5/31 11.00 0.00

2-year note 5/18 5/23 5/31 26.00 0.00

5-year note 5/18 5/24 5/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 5/18 5/25 5/31 28.00 0.00 80.76 18.24

3-year Note 6/8 6/12 6/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 6/8 6/12 6/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 6/8 6/13 6/15 12.00 0.00 28.00 28.00

30-year TIPS ® 6/15 6/22 6/30 5.00 0.00

2-year note 6/22 6/26 6/30 26.00 0.00

5-year note 6/22 6/27 6/30 34.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 6/22 6/28 6/30 13.00 0.00

7-year note 6/22 6/28 6/30 28.00 0.00 79.36 26.64

511.00 436.55 74.45

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 26
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Issuance of Permit for Marine Mammals

    On September 17, 1997, a notice was published in the Federal 
Register, Vol. 62, No. 180, Page 48880, that an application had been 
filed with the Fish and Wildlife Service by Daniel Currier, Fargo, ND 
for a permit (PRT-834123) to import a sport-hunted polar bear (Ursus 
maritimus) trophy, taken from the McClintock Channel population, 
Northwest Territories, Canada for personal use.
    Notice is hereby given that on November 13, 1997, as authorized by 
the provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) the Fish and Wildlife Service authorized the 
requested permit subject to certain conditions set forth therein.
    Documents and other information submitted for these applications 
are available for review by any party who submits a written request to 
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 
4401 North Fairfax Drive, Rm 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone 
(703) 358-2104 or Fax (703) 358-2281.

    Dated: December 5, 1997.
MaryEllen Amtower,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 97-32404 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
#### Albert BALLENTINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-443.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 12, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.