alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J o n a t h a n G r u b e r

E l i t e A i r P r o d u c t i o n s

2 4 1 6 F i e l d s S o u t h D r

. U n i t 2 0 2

C h a m p a i g n

, I L 6 1 8 2 2

A p r i l 1 1 t h

, 2 0 1 5

D o c k e t O p e r a t i o n s

, M

­ 3 0

U

. S

. D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n

R o o m W 1 2

­ 1 4 0

, W e s t B u i l d i n g G r o u n d F l o o r

1 2 0 0 N e w J e r s e y A v e n u e

, S E

.

W a s h i n g t o n

, D C 2 0 5 9 0

­ 0 0 0 1

A p p l i c a t i o n

t o A m e n d

S e c t i o n 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n N o

. 1 3 1 3 4

R e g u l a t o r y D o c k e t N o

. F A

A

– 2 0 1 5

– 3 0 8 8

D e a r S i r o r M a d a m :

B y l e t t e r f r o m t h e F A

A d a t e d O c t o b e r 8

, 2 0 1 5

, a n e x e m p t i o n w a s g r a n t e d t o J o n a t h a n G r u b e r

f o r r e l i e f u n d e r S e c t i o n 3 3 3

. T h a t l e t t e r w a s m a r k e d S e c t i o n 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n N o

. 1 3 1 3 4

R e g u l a t o r y D o c k e t N o

. F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 3 0 8 8

.

J o n a t h a n G r u b e r a n d E l i t e A i r P r o d u c t i o n s r e q u e s t s t h a t t h e e x e m p t i o n g r a n t e d b e a m e n d e d t o

i n c l u d e t h e f

o l l o w i n g :

● T h e a d d i t i o n o f c l o s e d s e t f i l m i n g a u t h o r i z a t i o n f o r M o v i e a n d T e l e v i s i o n p r o d u c t i o n

.

○ A t t a c h e d y o u w i l l f i n d t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l

( M P T O M )

● D J I X 5 a n d X 5 R c a m e r a s y s t e m U s e r M a n u a l s

○ X 5 / X 5 R S p e c s

, U s e r M a n u a l

● N o t i c e o f R e v i s i o n t o E l i t e A i r P r o d u c t i o n s F l i g h t O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a lT h e f i n d i n g s

, r a t i o n a l e

, a n d c o n c l u s i o n s c o n t a i n e d i n t h e F A A ’ s E x e m p t i o n N o

. 1 3 1 3 4 a p p l y

w i t h o u t m o d i f i c a t i o n t o t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n t o i n c l u d e t h e a d d i t i o n a l I n s p i r e 1 c a m e r a s i n E x e m p t i o n

N o

. 1 3 1 3 4

. R e v i s i o n t o t h e E l i t e A i r P r o d u c t i o n s F l i g h t O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l d o e s n o t c o n s t i t u t e a

c h a n g e i n o p e r a t i o n s a f

f e c t i n g t h i s e x e m p t i o n

. T h e n e w r e v i s i o n i s t o i n c l u d e e d i t o r i a l r e v i s i o n s

.

T h a n k y o u f o r y o u r c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h i s i m p o r t a n t r e q u e s t

. P l e a s e a d v i s e u s o f a n y a d d i t i o n a l

i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t i s r e q u i r e d

.

S i n c e r e l y

, J o n a t h a n G r u b e r
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20645 Summary Calendar

NICK ALFRED AGUILAR , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
STATE OF TEXAS , Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CV

- 3278

Before BARKSDALE, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Proceeding pro se , Nick Alfred Aguilar, Texas prisoner # 324831 , on parole from a n enhanced life sentence for possession of heroin , challenges the dismissal of his pro se civil

- rights complaint a gainst the State of Texas . In the complaint, he claimed his incarceration (of a heroin addict) viola ted the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment because the

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 12, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20645 Document: 00513151281 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2015No. 14

- 20645

2 State acted with deliberate indifference

. A dismissal for failure to state a claim
is reviewed de novo

. E.g., Varela v. Gonzales , 773 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir. 2014). Aguilar’s contention , that the Attorney General of Texas lacked standing to file the motion to dismiss his complaint , fails because, under Texas law, the Texas Attorney General serves as the common legal representative of State agencies. E.g., Sierra Clu b v. City of San Antoni o, 115 F.3d 311, 314 (5th Cir. 1997). Aguilar neither recognizes nor challenges the district court’s conclusions that his complaint was barred by th e Eleventh Amendment and Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994) . Accordingly, he h as abandoned any challenge
to those conclusions

. E.g., Brinkmann v. Dall. Cnty

. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987 )

. Furthermore, Aguilar’s reliance on R obinson v. California , 370 U.S. 660, 666

- 67 (1962), is misplaced because he was n ot convicted under Texas law based on his use of heroin, but because he possessed
it

. AFFIRMED. Case: 14-20645 Document: 00513151281 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/12/2015
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

h0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146028

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146028

COA: 302702

Macomb CC: 2010-003534-FC

WILLIE COOPER, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Treasury approves Rhode Island’s plan to invest $25 million of CPF funding 

in broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet 

to locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Rhode Island

 

▪ Program Summary: $25 million for Broadband Infrastructure (22% of CPF allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 7,500 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: The ConnectRI Broadband

Deployment Program is a competitive grant program

designed to fund last mile broadband infrastructure projects

in areas that currently lack access to internet at speeds

of 100/20 Mbps.

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps upon 

project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

▪ Key State Contact: The Rhode Island Commerce Corporation

Rhode Island Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Rhode Island, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~30% of locations still 

lacking high-speed internet 

access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated December 26, 2012 and filed as exhibit 99.1 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the "Annual Report") of ECA Marcellus Trust I (the "Trust") into the Registration Statements of the Trust
on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-185396) and Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-185397) and to the references to our firm in
the Annual Report.

/s/ Ryder Scott Company
Ryder Scott Company


Denver,
Colorado
May 15, 2013

---
Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Connecticut Light and Power
Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W.
Grise, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and John H. Forsgren,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Cheryl W. Grise
    (Signature)
    Cheryl W. Grise
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Jan - Mar

2011 Actual 470 265 (20) 245 (225) 118 0

Apr - Jun

2011 Actual 149 190 (22) 167 19 137 0

Jul - Sep

2011 Actual 342 286 (23) 264 (79) 58 0

Oct - Dec

2011 Actual 284 310 2 312 28 86 0

Jan - Mar

2012 Actual 440 401 (3) 398 (42) 43 0

Apr - Jun

2012 Actual 129 172 5 177 48 91 0

Jul - Sep

2012 Actual 234 264 (36) 228 (6) 85 (32)

Oct - Dec

2012 Actual 291 297 1 298 7 93 (1)

Jan - Mar

2013 Actual 354 349 (8) 341 (14) 79 0

Apr - Jun

2013 Actual (73) (11) (7) (18) 56 135 0

Jul - Sep

2013 Actual 205 197 (38) 159 (46) 88 0

Oct - Dec

2013 Actual 179 264 (11) 253 74 162 0

Jan - Mar

2014 Actual 275 265 (10) 254 (20) 142 0

Apr - Jun

2014 Actual (60) (64) 1 (63) (3) 139 0

Jul - Sep

2014 Actual 176 205 (10) 195 19 158 0

Oct - Dec

2014 Actual 170 227 8 236 65 223 0

Jan - Mar

2015 Actual 268 141 3 144 (123) 100 0

Apr - Jun

2015 Actual (120) 57 (22) 35 154 254 0

Jul - Sep

2015 Actual 163 133 (26) 107 (56) 199 0

Oct - Dec November 2, 2015 206 344 (11) 333 127 325 0

2015 Actual 212 354 (7) 347 135 333 0

Forecast Revisions 6 9 5 14 8 8 0

Jan - Mar November 2, 2015 239 165 9 174 (65) 260 0

2016 February 1, 2016 263 250 (1) 249 (13) 320 0

Forecast Revisions 24 85 (10) 75 51 60 0

Apr - Jun

2016 February 1, 2016 (137) (112) 5 (107) 30 350 0

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
#### Sam F. SANTI, Individually, and Santi Equipment Rentals, Inc., a Florida corporation, jointly and severally, Appellants, v. The ZACK COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 73-164.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 18, 1973.

Glazer & Glazer, Miami, for appellants.

Friedman, Britton & Stettin, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The single point raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to amend the complaint during trial. The amendment sought to completely change the basis of the action. It cannot be said that under *128the circumstances of this case an abuse of discretion has been shown. See Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 817.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2312 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2312

  To provide for the use of peer support, peer mentoring, and career 
     coaching in demonstration projects conducted under the health 
 profession opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social 
                             Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2021

 Mr. Evans (for himself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the use of peer support, peer mentoring, and career 
     coaching in demonstration projects conducted under the health 
 profession opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social 
                             Security Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mentoring and Supporting Families 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF PEER SUPPORT, PEER MENTORING, AND CAREER COACHING.

    Section 2008 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397g) is 
amended by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and 
(e), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Use of Peer Support, Peer Mentoring, and Career Coaching.--
            ``(1) Preference in considering applications.--In 
        considering applications for a grant under this section, the 
        Secretary shall give preference to--
                    ``(A) applications that include opportunities for 
                peer support or peer mentoring, and make career 
                coaching available, as part of the case management 
                plan; and
                    ``(B) applications that include a commitment to 
                providing project participants with a monthly cash 
                stipend equivalent to 50 percent of the Federal poverty 
                level.
            ``(2) Inclusion among support services.--A project for 
        which a grant is made under this section shall include case 
        management plans that include career coaching (with the option 
        to offer appropriate peer support and mentoring opportunities 
        to help develop soft skills and social capital), which may be 
        offered on an ongoing basis before, during, and after initial 
        training as part of a career pathway model.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 
2021.
                                 <all>
```
#### Willie Joseph MILLER v. STATE.

No. 38365.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 217 So.2d 903.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,988-01

EX PARTE JULIO ZUNIGA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2014CR0936-W1 IN THE 187 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that he was denied the right to appeal. The trial court has determined that

trial counsel was allowed to withdraw and appellate counsel was not appointed. The State and trial

court agree that Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal. 

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the

judgment of conviction in Cause No. 2014CR0936 from the 187 District Court of Bexar County. 

th
2

Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he

may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of

this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent

and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to

represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been

imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant

desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the

trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant’s remaining claims are

dismissed. Ex Parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: April 1, 2015

Do not publish
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2011-1937]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economic Development Administration

13 CFR Chapter III

[Docket No.: 110119042-1041-01]
RIN 0610-XA04

Request for Comments: Review and Improvement of EDA's Regulations

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2011-1937 beginning on page 5501 in the 
issue of Tuesday, February 1, 2011 make the following correction:
    On page 5503, in the first column, in the 14th line, ``March 14, 
2011'' should read ``March 9, 2011''.

[FR Doc. C1-2011-1937 Filed 2-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 32.1.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eugene R. McGrath, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, which this statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   |  | /s/EUGENE R. MCGRATHEugene R. McGrath
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2004 |  |                                      

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 15.1








June 23, 2011





Securities and Exchange Commission


450 Fifth Street, N.W.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Commissioners:





We have read the statements made by Ossen Innovation C., Ltd. pursuant to Item 16F of Form 20-F to be filed with the Commission, as part of the Company's annual report on Form 20-F. We agree with the statements concerning our Firm in such Form 20-F.  We have no basis to agree or disagree with any other statements made in the filing.











Very truly yours,










/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP


Sherb & Co., LLP
PMN Chemical Manufacturing Process
Exhibit 10.34
​
AUTOZONE, INC.
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
2020 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
​
This Amendment No. 1 to the AutoZone, Inc. (the “Company”) 2020 Omnibus Incentive Award Plan (the “Amendment”), hereby amends the Company’s 2020 Omnibus Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) as provided below. 
​
1.Amendment.  Article 4 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding Section 4.8 as follows:
​
 4.8 Minimum Vesting Period.  Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, equity-based Awards granted under the Plan shall vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date the Award is granted (excluding, for this purpose, any (i) Substitute Awards, (ii) Shares delivered in lieu of fully vested Cash-Based Awards and (iii) Awards to Non-Employee Directors that vest on the earlier of the one year anniversary of the date of grant or the next annual meeting of stockholders which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting); provided, that, the Administrator may grant equity-based Awards without regard to the foregoing minimum vesting requirement with respect to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the Share Limit (subject to adjustment under Section 13.2); and, provided further, for the avoidance of doubt, that the foregoing restriction does not apply to the Administrator’s discretion to provide for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any Award, including in cases of retirement, death, Disability or a Change in Control, in the terms of the Award or otherwise.
​
2.Miscellaneous.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan.
Document




Summary of Director Compensation Program
(Effective July 23, 2021)


															
	Annual Cash Retainer:		$	60,000 			
	Additional Annual Retainers:				
	Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee Chairperson		$	20,000 			
	Audit Committee Chairperson		$	20,000 			
	Talent, Development, and Compensation Committee Chairperson		$	20,000 			
	Non-Employee Chairman		$	75,000 			
	Initial Equity Grant		$	100,000 			(a)
	Annual Equity Grant		$	175,000 			(b)


(a) Upon election to the Board, each non-employee director receives restricted stock units with a value equal to $100,000, calculated by using the closing price of our common stock on the date of the non-employee director’s election to the Board. The initial restricted stock unit grant vests on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the non-employee director’s continued membership on the Board as of such date.
(b) On the day following the annual meeting of shareholders, each director receives restricted stock units with a value equal to that indicated in the above chart, calculated by using the closing price of our common stock on the day following the annual meeting of shareholders. The annual restricted stock unit grant vests the day prior to the following year’s annual meeting date, subject to a director’s continued membership on the Board as of such date.