.-' 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 

BAQE-039-91 Bureau or AH Qualltv );onnan H. Bangerter 1950 West Norm TemOle GoYen>oT 

:> O. Box 16690 Suzanne Dandoy. M.D.. M.P.H. 

£.xccut1vr Dl~ Salt Lake C'lv. Ulan 84 16·,)690 

Kennel" L. Alkema (801 ) 536-4000
 

Director (801) 536-4099 FAX
 

February 7, 1991 

James R. Van Orman
 

Director, Environmental Management
 

Department of the Air Force
 

Headquarters Ogden Air Logistics Center
 

Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056-5990
 

Re:	 .A.pproval Order for Building 1701 - Dip Tank, Bake Oven. ?aint Booths 

Davis Count.y CDS .~1

Dear Mr. Van Orman: 

The above-referenced project has been evaluated and found to be consistent 

wi th the requirements of the Utah Air Conserva.tion Regulations (UACR) and the 

Utah Air Conservation Act. A 30-day public comment. period was held and all 

comments received were evaluated. The conditions of this approval order 

reflect any changes to the proposed conditions which resulted from the 

evaluation of the comments received. This air quality approval order 

authorizes the project with the following conditions and failure to comply 

with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of this order: 

2..	 Hill Air ~orce Base, located i:l Davis County, shall make the 

following changes according to the information submitted in the 

notice of intent dated April 27, 1990, and a letter from Hill Air 

Force Base dated December 21, 1990: 

A.	 The owner/operator shall install a dip tank, 370 gallon 

capacity cylindrical tank, with dimensions of 4 feet in 

diameter and 4 feet high. The tank shall be equipped with 

a sealed clam-type lid, an outside pump :or agitation, an 

electric heater, and a cover with a vent. 

B.	 The ownerioperator shall remove paint booth Hi and replace 

it with a Devilbiss Model ASEY-914-34 paint spray booth or 

equivalent. Equivalency shall be determined by ~he

Executive Secretary. The booth shall be equipped ~ith dry 

paint arrestor filters. 

4.2.4-848
 
James	 R. Van Orman 

January 31. 1991 

Page 2 

e.	 The owner/operator shall remove paint booth #3 and replace 

it with two end-to-end paint spray booths. The booths 

shall be equipped with dry paint arrestor filters and High 

Volume Low Pressure (HVLP) type spray guns. 

D.	 The owner/operator shall remove the electric powered bake 

oven and replace it with an oven fired by natural gas with 

a total heat input rate not to exceed t~o million BTU/hr. 

2.	 Visible emissions :=om any point or fugitive emission source 

associated with the above emission points shall not exceed 10Z 

opacity. Opacity observation of emissions from stationary 

sources shall be conducted in a~cordance with 40 CFR 60. Appendix 

A. Method 9. 

3.	 The follo~ing operation limits for the bake oven shall not be 

exceeded without prior cpproval in accordance with Section 3.1. 

UACR: 

A.	 2.2 million sci of natural gas per 12 month period 

B.	 2.0 million BTU/hr heat input 

C.	 8 hours per day 

D.	 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period 

Compliance with the annual limitations shall be determined on a 

rolling monthly total. On the first day of each month a new 12­

month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. 

Records of production shall be kept for all periods when the 

plant is in operation. Records of production shall be made 

available to the Executive Secretary or his representative upon 

request and shall include a period of t~o years ending with the 

date of the request. Fuel consumption for the bake oven shall be 

determined by the use of records from a fuel meter. Hours of 

operation shall be determined by supervisor monitoring and 

maintaining of an operations log. 

4.	 The total vae emissions from sources listed in this approval 

order shall not exceed 4.70 tons per 12-month period ~i thout 

prior approval in accordance with Section 3.1. UACR. Compliance 

with the limitation shall be determined using a material balance 

procedure on a rolling monthly total. On the first day of each 

month a new 12-month total shall be calculated using the previous 

12 months. The total vac emissions shall be determined by 

;naintaining a record of paints. varnishes. thinners. and solvents 

used. and of operation ~ara~eters from other affected VOC 

emissions sources. The recort shall include the following data 

for each item used: 

4.2.4-849 
james	 R. Van Orman 

January 31. 1991 

Page 3 

A.	 Name of paint. varnish, thinner. or solvent 

B.	 Weight in pounds per gallon 

e.	 Percent vae by weight 

D.	 Amount used on a daily basis 

Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the 

plant is in operation. Records of consumption shall be made 

available to the Executive Secretary upon request, and shall 

include a period of two years ending with the date of the 

request. The voe emissions from paints/thinners shall not exceed 

4.69 tons per 12 month period, The vae emissions from other 

processes shall not exceed 0.01 tons per 12 month period. 

Voc emissions shall be determined by the following manner: 

vae = (% Volatile by Weight I 100) * (Density l~/gal) * 

(Gallons Consumed) / (2,000 Ib/ton) 

The vae content ~n pounds for each individual item or surface 

coating used shall be calculated. and then the total of all items 

shall be summed, such that the cumulative total shall not exceed 

the 4.69 tons per 12 month period as specified. 

S.	 All paint spray booths shall be equipped with a set of paint 

arrestor particulate filters or equivalent to control particulate 

emissions. All air exiting any booth shall pass through a paint 

arrestor control system before being vented to the a~osphere.

Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary. 

6.	 The owner i opera tor shall operate the dip tank i:1 following 

manner: 

A.	 The cover shall remain closed at all times except during 

actual loading. unloading, or transfer operations. 

B.	 Parts shall be completely drained in the internal draining 

rack until all dripping ceases. 

C.	 Waste or used varnish shall be stored i~ covered containers 

and disposed by a method which prevents vae emissions to 

the atmosphere. 

D.	 Tanks, containers, and all associated equipment shall be 

maintained in good operating condition, and leaks shall be 

repaired immediately. 

E.	 Written procedures for the operation and maintenance of the 

dip tank shall be posted in an accessible and apparent 

location near the equipment. 

4.2.4-850 
James R. Van Orman
 

January 31, 1991
 

Page 4
 

7.	 Eighteen months from the date of this approval order the 

Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing of the status of 

construction of this project unless the construction is complete 

and operation has commenced. 

8.	 A copy of this approval order shall be posted on site and shall 

be available to the employees who operate the air emission 

producing equipment. All employees who operate the air emission 

producing equipment shall receive instruction as to their 

responsibilities in operating the equipment in compliance with 

the appropriate and relevant conditions. 

9.	 All installations and facil.ities authorized by this approval 

order shall be adequately and properly maintained. 

10.	 The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon startup of the installation. as an initial compliance inspection is 

required. 

Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be 

approved in accordance wit Section 3.1.1. UACR. 

,- This approval order in no way releases the. owner or operator from any 

liability for compliance with all other applicable federal. state. and local 

regulations including the Utah Air conservation Regulations. 

Annual emissions for sources listed in this approval order are calculated at 

0.01 tons/yr for particulates. 0.01 tons/yr for PM10 • 0.0006 tons/yr for S02' 

0.10 tons/yr for NOx ' 0.02 tons/yr for CO. and 4.70 tons/yr for VOC. These 

calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of PSD and 

nonattainment area major source requirements of the UACR. Except for vac. 

:,,:"..:.j c:..': __ r~ .... ·... _ .... ~..,; ~.:;cu :01:" p -~ost:s vi c...t:L:i'rrU:":'~"6 c,.h..i..~_':"'c.ilC~.

Sincerely, 

t~~r~~CutiveSecretary 

Utah Air Conservation Committee 

FBC:TB:jiw 

cc:	 EPA Region VIII. Mike Owens
 

Davis County Health Department
 

,~.

4.2.4-851
 
DEPARTMENT OF THE AI R FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER (AFLC) 

,HIJ..L.AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH 84056-5990... ''''''''- - "~"". ---" '., ~.s.'.":'..-:.._.:.:.:=_,~ '"::;" - .' .". _.:, 

- RECEIVED 

/]/ '\ 

Mr F Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary DEC 2'1' 1990 

Bureau of Air Quality 

1950 West North Temple AIR QUALITY 

PO Box 16690 

Salt Lake City, UT 84116-0690 

RE: Public comments on Intent to Approve building 1701. Dip Tank, Bake Oven & 

Paint Booths. 

Dear Mr Cordner 

Referenced "Intent::'w"A:ppro'Q'e" dated 7 Dec 90. we offer the following public 

comments for your consideration 

Condition 1.A. - Per our 18 Oct 90 letter, dual wall dip tank shall be 370 

gallon capacity measuring approximately 4 feet inside diameter and 4 feet 

high, The tank will be located above ground. therefore, cathodic protection 

will not be provided, The tank will be provided wiLh a sealed clam type lid. 

outside pump liquid circulating Lype agitation, elecLric heater and a vent 

system. 

Condition 4 - Our estimation of VOC emissions from sources listed in this 

Intent to Approve is 3.28 tons per year, Revised VOC evaporative emissions 

from the dip tank are as follows: 

Uncontrolled AP-42 Emission Factor 0.15 Lb VaC/Hr, Ft 2 

Evaporative area (revised) 3,14 X (4)2 = 12.56 Ft 2 

4 

Operating hours about 1,000 hrsjYr 

Uncontrolled evaporative losi .15 Lb X 12,56 Ft 2 X 1,000 hrs X Ton 

hr, Ft 2 2,000 Lbs 

= 0,94 Ton/Yr 

Emission Reduction Factor 30-60% use 40% 

Evaporative VOC emissions 0,94 X ,6 = ,56 Ton/Yr 

Dip tank usage Loss (NOI) .06 Ton/Yr 

Paint booth #1 VOC emissions (~OI) ,12 + ,34 = ,46 Ton/Yr 

Baking Oven VOC emissions (NOI) .12 Ton/Yr 

Paint booth #3 VOC emissions (NOI) 2,08 Tons/Yr 

Total VOC emissions 0,56 + ,06 + ,46 + .12 + 2,08 

3,28 Tons/Yr 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contacL Jay Gupta at 777-6917, 

Sincerely, 

1~n9 .,: '\:Vi ES N. JNl(.·~':·

" ...

_ ~.:J." ....... 1.,
 

,I \ / _,.I. ri"'! ... 

4,2.4-852 A:::'C- COMBAT STRENGTH THROUGH LOGISTICS 
~.~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 

DMSION OF Er.-rvIRONMEI\TTAL HEALTH , BAQE. 74 5- 90

Bureau of Air Quality Nonnan H. Bangert.er 1950 West North Terr.ole Governor 

PO Box 16690 Suzanne Dandoy, M.D.. :"l.P.H. 

ExecutIve Director Salt Lake City. Utah 8~ 116-0690 

Kenneth L. Alkema (80 1) 536-4000
 

Director (801) 536-4099 FAX
 

December 3, 1990 

Newspaper Agency
 

Salt Lake Tribune
 

Legal Advertising Department
 

157 Regent Street
 

Salt Lake City. Utah 84111
 

Gentlemen: 

This letter will conrlrm tne autnorization to publish the attached NOTICE in the 

Salt Lake Tribune and Deserec t;ews on December 7, 1990. 

Please mail the invoice and affidavit of publication to the Utah State Department 

of Health. Division of Environmental ~ealth, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 

16690, Salt Lake City, [tan S41iO-0690. 

Siacerely. 

. I. "-, . i .' ~. y 1/ ' /, ,...G-:/v//'/(-., /' -• .I.' - .. / ,-./,..( ______1'..-' / <-1 _ ~-\ '- /r') L, ­

Jpys-e I. Wiswe 11 .
 P~f~te Technician
 I~ureau of Air Quality / . 

MK:jiw 

Enclosure 

4.2.4-853
 
NOTICE
 

The following notice of intent to cons truc t, submitted in accordance wi th 

Section 3.1, Utah Air Conservation Regulations, has been received for 

consideration by the Executive Secretary, Utah Air Conservation Commiccee: 

Department of the Air Force
 

Building 1701, Dip Tank, Bake Oven, Paint Booths
 

Davis County CDS Al
 

Net emissions from this source (building 1701 only) are calculated 

at the following values:
 

Particulate 0.01 tons/yr
 

PM10 0.01 tons/yr
 

NO)'; 0.10 tons/yr
 

CO 0.02 tons/yr
 

VOC 4.70 tons/yr
 

The engineering evaluation and air quality impact analysis has been completed and 

no adverse air quality impacts are expected. It is the intent to the Executive 

Secretary to approve the construction project. 

The construction proposal and estimates of the effect on local air quality are 

available for public inspection and comment at the Bureau of Air Quality, Utah 

State Department of Health, 1950 ~est North Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116­

0690. ~ritten comments received by the Bureau, 1950 ~est North Temple, P.O. Box 

16690, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116-0690, on or before January 6, 1991, will be 

considered in making the final decision on the approval or disapproval of the 

proposed construction. 

If anyone so requests within 15 days of publication of notice, a hearing will be 

held in the area of the proposed construction, installation. modification, 

relocation. or establishment. 

Date of Notice: December 7, 1990 

-,
 

4.2.4-854
 
UTAH BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY
 

NEW/MODIFIED SOURCE PLAN REVIEW
 

James R. Van Orman 

Director, Environmental Management 

Department of the Air Force 

Headquarters Ogden Air Logistics Center 

Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056-5990 

ENGINEER: L. Carl Broadhead 

RE: Building 1701, Dip Tank, Bake Oven, Paint Booths 

Davis County, CDS A1 

DATE: November 29, 1990 

NOTICE OF INTENT DATED: April 27, 1990 

PLANT CONTACT: Jay Gupta 

PHONE NUMBER: (801) 777-7651 

PLANT LOCATION: HAFB, Building 1701 

FEES: 

Filing Fee $100.00 

Review Engineer - 26 hours at S50.00/hour $1300.00 

Modeler - 00 hours at $23.22/hour $000.00 

Computer Usage Fee $000.00 

Notice to Paper $24.00 

Travel - 00 miles at $0.23/mile $000.00 

Total $1424.00 

APPROVALS: 

Engineering Unit Manager 

c~ Applicant Contact Made ~D

Technical Evaluation Section Manager )1\1\. \ 

4.2.4-855
 
I.	 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 

Hill Air Force Base has filed a notice of intent dated April 27, 1990. They are 

proposing to install and operate a dip tank, new paint spray booths (#l and #3), 

and a bake oven. The location of these facilities will be in Building 1701. The 

description of each facility is as follows: 

Dip Tank 

The dip tank, an industrial heavy duty double wall tank, will contain thermelic 

insulating varnish for dip coating of locomotive electrical components including 

generators and their components. These components are currently hand coated 

using a brush, resulting in nonuniform electrical insulation. The cylindrical 

dip tank will have inner dimensions of 7 feet in diameter and 7 feet high with 

a capacity of 2,000 gallons. The tank will be installed vertically with 5 feet 

underground and 2 feet of tank above ground. The tank will be equipped with 

cathodic protection, a dip drain or catch system, a leak detection system, and 

a ventilation system installed on the upper side portion of the tank. A sealed 

clam-type lid will be also provided to cover the top of the tank. The lid will 

be kept closed except when loading or unloading components. 

The tank will be agitated and fitted with an electric heater capable of heating 

varnish to a temperature of 90-100oF. The dip coated components will be airdried in paint spray booth #1 and then baked in the bake oven. The following 

numbers describe the operation: 

A.	 Annual operating hours - 1000 hours per year. 

B.	 Annual usage rate - 144 gallons of varnish per 12 month period. 

C.	 Stack diameter - 12 inches. 

D.	 Stack height - 60 feet above ground. 

Paint	 Spray Booth #1 

This booth is a waterfall type paint spray booth and will be replaced with a 

Devilbiss Model ASEY-914-34 dry filters paint spray booth. The dimensions of the 

proposed paint spray booth are 15 feet long, 12 feet wide, and 10 feet high. The 

paint spray booth will be equipped with paint arrestor filters, exhaust plenum, 

a fan, and a 34 inch diameter vent. The following numbers describe the 

operatiotl: 

A.	 Annual operating hours - 1000 hours per 12 month period 

B.	 Annual usage rate 120 gallons of paint per 12 month period 

(current limitation). 

C.	 Exhaust face velocity - 100 feet per minute. 

D.	 Exhaust flow rate - 18,000 cubic feet per minute. 

E.	 Stack diameter - 34 inches. 

F.	 Stack height - 50 feet above ground 

Paint	 Spray Booth #3 

This booth will be replaced with two (2) end-to-end rail car drive-through, down 

draft air paint booths including material handling equipment, make-up air units 

~~d paint handling and spray equipment. The dimensions of the each segment, 

north and south, are 76 feet long, 20 feet wide, and 21 feet high and 22 feet 

long, 20 feet wide, and 21 feet high, respectively. The two segments will be 

2 4.2.4-856 
constructed as a single booth divided by bifolding doors. Each paint spray booth 

segment will be self supporting with its own balanced exhaust, make-up air units 

and controls. Each segment will also be equipped with an audible alarm to warn 

the painters when and if the air filters are functioning improperly. 

This notice of intent also proposed to replace the existing conventional spray 

gun with High Volume Low Pressure (HVLP) spray guns which will result in high 

transfer efficiency. This should lower paint consumption for the same amount of 

work load resulting in lower VOC emissions to the atmosphere. The following 

numbers describe the operation: 

A.	 Annual operating hours - 1000 hours per year 

B.	 Annual usage rate 800 gallons of paint per 12 month period 

(current limitation). 

C.	 Exhaust face velocity - 100 feet per minute. 

D.	 Exhaust flow rate - 18,000 cubic feet per minute. 

E.	 Stack diameter - 34 inches. 

F.	 Stack height - 50 feet above ground 

Bake Oven 

The electric bake oven will be replaced with a natural gas fired oven. The heat 

input for the proposed natural gas fired oven is 2 million BTU per hour. Its 

operating temperature range will be 0-450oF. The dimensions of the oven are 10 

feet long, 10 feet wide, and 10 feet high. The following numbers describe the 

operation: 

A.	 Annual operating hours - 1000 hours per year. 

B.	 Total oven capacity - 2 million Btu per hour. 

C.	 Fuel - natural gas. 

C.	 Exhaust flow rate - 1,000 cubic feet per minute. 

D.	 Stack diameter - 10 inches. 

E.	 Stack height - 50 feet above ground 

II.	 EMISSION SUMMARY 

The emissions from this source (Building 1701) will be as follows: 

Particulate 0.01 tons';year
 

PM,o 0.01 tons/year
 

S02 0.00 tons/year
 

NOx 0.10 tons/year
 

CO ,,..,,k. 0.02 tons/year
 

VOC ~J"'1~ .~ tons/year
 

III.	 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (BACT) ANALYSIS 

BACT will be required at all emission points. This includes the following points: 

A.	 Dip tank 

B.	 Paint spray booths 

C.	 Bake oven 

3 

4.2.4-857 
Dip Tank 

Several types of control techniques are available to reduce VOC emissions from 

a dip coating operation. These methods can be broadly categorized as either 

control equipment or new coating and application systems. Possible best 

available control technology equipment includes carbon adsorption and 

incineration. Installation of either of these options is not economical or 

practical, especially with modest VOC emissions. The capital cost of adsorption 

units is assumed to be $10jCFM. New coatings with relatively low VOC contents 

can be used in place of high VOC content coatings. This method of control may 

not be available for HAFB due to the coating requisition for the electronic 

component insulation. 

The engineering section recommends that BACT for the dip tank be the minimization 

of VOC emissions through good operating practice. The cover should be kept 

closed at all times except for loading and unloading of components. Waste or 

used coating shall be stored in covered containers and disposed by a method which 

prevents its emission into the atmosphere. 

Paint	 Spray Booths 

Several types of control techniques are available to reduce VOC emissions from 

surface coating operations. These methods can be broadly categorized as either 

control equipment or new coating and application systems. Best available control 

technology equipment includes carbon adsorption and incineration. Installation 

of these control devices is not economical or practical, especially with modest 

VOC emissions. New coatings with relatively low VOC coatings can be used in 

place of high VOC content coatings. This me~hod of control may not be available 

for HAFB due to the requisition of coating materials. 

The engineering section recommends tha~ BACT for the paint spray booths be the .. 

minimization of emissions through good operating practice. Improvements in 

transfer efficiency decrease the amount of coating used which will result in 

reducing VOC emissions into the atmosphere. The distance between spray gun and 

substrate to be painted must be minimized to increase the transfer efficiency. 

Waste or used coating shall be stored in covered containers and disposed of by 

a method which prevents its emission into the atmosphere. Paint particulate 

emissions from the spray booth will be controlled by dry filters. All air 

exiting the booth shall pass through this control system before being vented into 

the atmosphere. The dry filter must be properly maintained and kept in good 

condition at all times. . 

Bake Oven 

The engineering section recommends that BACT for the bake oven be 10% opacity and 

the minimization of emissions through good operating practices. The bake oven 

must be properly maintained and operated in good working condition. Natural gas 

is the cleanest fuel available. The properly maintained and operated oven will 

also be beneficial in that it will minimize VOC and CO emissions. 

IV.	 APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL AND UTAH AIR CONSERVATION REGULATIONS (UACR) 

This notice of intent is for a modifica~ion ~o an existing major source. It is 

not a new major source or a major modification of existing sources. The 

following federal and state regulations have been examined to determine their 

applicability to this notice of intent: 

1.	 Section 3.1.1, UACR - Notice of intent required a modified source. 

This regulation applies. 

-


4 

4.2.4-858 
2.	 Section 3.1.8, UACR Application of best available control 

technology (BACT) required at all emission points. This regulation 

applies. 

3.	 Section 3.1.9, UACR - Rules for relocation of temporary sources. 

HAFB is a permanent source. Therefore, this regulation does not 

apply. 

4.	 Section 3.1.10, UACR - Additional information requirements for a new 

major source or a major modification which emits precursors of ozone 

and impact an area of nonattainment for ozone. This notice of 

intent does not represent a new major source or a major 

modification. Therefore, this regulation does not apply. 

5.	 Section 3.2, UACR - Particulate emission limitations for existing 

sources which are located in a nonattainment area. HAFB is listed 

in this regulation. However, these new emission points at the base 

are ~ct ir.cludec i~ that listin;. The=efc=e, this regulatic~ does 

not apply. 

6.	 Section 3.3.1, UACR - Emission limitation for new major sources 

which are located in a nonattainment area or which impact a 

nonattainment area. This notice of intent does not represent a new 

major source or a major modification. Therefore, this regulation 

will not apply. 

7.	 Section 3.3.2, UACR - Review requirements for new major sources or 

major modifications which are located in a nonattainment area or 

which impact a nonattainment area. This notice of intent does not 

represent a new major source or a major modification. Therefore, 

this regulation will not apply. 

8.	 Section 3.5, UACR - Emission inventory reporting requirements. This 

regulation requires any source which emits 25 tons or more per year 

of any pollutant to submit an emission inventory to the Bureau of 

Air Quality every year. This source must comply with this 

regulation since its entire source emissions are greater than 25 

tons per year. Therefore, HAFB shall include emissions from sources 

listed in this approval order in its annual emission inventory. 

9.	 Section 3.6.5(b), UACR - Prevention of significant deterioration 

(PSD) review requirements for new major sources or major 

modifications. This notice of intent does not represent a new major 

source or a major modification under PSD rules. Therefore, this' 

regulation does not apply. 

10.	 Section 3.8, UACR - Stack height rule. This regulation limits the 

creditable height of stacks to that height determined to be good 

engineering practice. The formulas used to determine good 

engineering practice are found in 40 CFR 51.1. A de minimus height 

of 65 meters (213.2 feet) is allowed. This notice of intent does 

not have stacks which exceed 65 meters in height. HAFB is in 

compliance with this regulation. 

11.	 Section 3.11, UACR - Visibility screening analysis requirements. 

This regulation requires all new major sources or major 

modifications to undergo a visibility screening analysis to 

determine visibility impact on any mandatory Class I area. This 

notice of inten~ ~oes not re?resent a new major source or a major 

modification under UACR rules. Therefore, this regulation does not 

apply. 

5 

4.2.4-859 
12.	 Section 4.1.2, UACR - 20% opacity l~itation at all emission points 

unless a more stringent limitation is required by New Source 

Performance Standards (NSPS) or BACT or National Emission Standards 

for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). In this case, BACT will 

require a lower opacity limitation of 10%. 

13.	 Section 4.1.9, UACR - EPA Method 9 to be used for visible emission 

observations. This regulation applies. 

14.	 Section 4.2.1, UACR - Sulfur content l~itations in oil and coal 

used for combustion. This notice of intent does not contain oil or 

coal burning sources. Therefore, this regulation does not apply. 

15.	 Section 4.7, UACR - Unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. 

This regulation applies. 

16.	 Section 4.9, UACR Review requirements for volatile organic 

compound (Vee) sources located in a nonattainment area for ozone. 

~~~~ re;~:ati=~ =C7e=~ ~he ~=~:~:,;in; ===~=~

A.	 Petroleum liquid storage 

B.	 Petroleum liquid transfer/storage 

C.	 Control of hydrocarbon emissions in refineries
 

1) vacuum producing systems
 

2) wastewater separators
 

3) process unit turnaround
 

4) catalytic cracking units
 

5) safety pressure relief valves
 

6) leaks from petroleum refinery equipment
 

D.	 Degreasing and solvent cleaning operations
 

1) cold cleaning facilities
 

2) open top vapor degreasers
 

3) conveyorized degreasers
 

E.	 Cutback asphalt 

F.	 vec used for various processes
 

1) paper coating
 

2) fabric and vinyl coating
 

3) metal furniture coating
 

4) large appliance surface coating
 

5) magnet wire coating
 

6) flat wood coating
 

7) misc. metal parts and products
 

8) graphic arts
 

G.	 Synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing 

H.	 Perchlorethylene dry cleaning plants. 

This regulation would apply if these emission points were existing 

sources at the time of promulgation of this regulation. However, in 

this case, this regulation has been superceded by BACT requirements. 

17.	 Section 5, UACR - Emergency episode requirements. This regulation 

applies. 

18.	 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) ­

There are no NESHAPS for this industrial process. 

19.	 National Ambient Air Quality standards (NAAQS) - This source is 

located in Davis County, which is a nonattainment area for ozone. 

The Bureau of Air Quality guidelines does not call for this notice 

of intent to be modeled for any pollutant. The Bureau has found 

through experience that, because of the small increase in the 

quantity of emissions involved and the conservative predictions made 

by modeling, a source or emission point of this small size or 

increase is very unlikely to cause a new violation of the NAAQS. 

4.2.4-860 

6 
20.	 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) - There is no NSPS for this 

industrial process. 

21.	 40 CFR 60.14, Definition of Modification Any physical or 

operational change to an existing facility which results in an 

increase in the emission rate to the atmosphere of any pollutant to 

which an NSPS standard applies. The following are not by themselves 

considered modifications: 

1)	 Maintenance, repair, and replacement 

2)	 An in~rease in production rate of an existing facility, if 

that increase can be accomplished without a capital 

expenditure on that facility 

3)	 An increase in the hours of operation 

4)	 Use of an alte~native fuel or raw material if, prior to the 

date any standard under this part becomes applicable to that 

source type, as provided by 60.1, the existing facility was 

designed to accommodate that alternative use 

5)	 The addition or use of any system or device whose primary 

function is the ~eduction of air pollutants 

6)	 Relocation or change in ownership 

This notice of intent represents a modification under this rule. 

22.	 Definition of Major Modification - It means any physical change in 

or change in the method of operation of a major source that would 

result in a significant net emission increase of any pollutant. A 

net emissions increase that is significant for VOC shall be 

considered significant for ozone. A physical change or change in 

the method of operation shall not include: 

A.	 Routine maintenance, repair, or replacement 

B.	 Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by reason of an 

order under Section 2a and b of the ESECA of 1974 or by reason 

of a natural gas curtailment plan pursuant to the Federal 

Power Act 

C.	 Use of an alternative fuel by reason of an order under Section 

125 of the CM 

D.	 Use of an alternative fuel at a steam generating unit to the 

extent that the fuel is generated from municipal solid waste 

E.	 Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by a source: 

1)	 which the source was capable of accommodating before 

January 6, 1975, unless such change would be prohibited 

under any enforceable permit condition 

2)	 which the source is otherwise approved to use 

7 4.2.4-861 
F.	 An increase in the hours of operation or the production rate 

unless such change would be prohibited under any enforceable 

permit condition 

G.	 Any change in ownership at a source 

This notice of intent does not represent a major modification under 

this rule. 

V.	 RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ORDER CONDITIONS 

1.	 Hill Air Force Base, located in Davis County, shall make the 

following changes according to the information submitted in the 

notice of intent dated April 27, 1990: 

A.	 Install a dip tank, 2000 gallon capacity cylindrical tank with 

dimensions of 7 feet diameter and 7 feet high, equipped with 

cathodic protection, a dip drain o!" catch system, a leak 

detection system, an electric heater, and a cover. 

B.	 Remove paint booth #1 and replace it with a Devilbiss Model 

ASEY-914-34 paint spray booth or equivalent - Equivalency 

shall be determined by the Executive Secretary. The booth 

shall be equipped with dry paint arrestor filters. 

c.	 Remove paint booth #3 and replace it with two end to end paint 

spray booths - The booths shall be equipped with dry paint 

arrestor filters and High Volume Low Pressure (HVLP) type 

spray guns. 

D.	 Remove the electric powered bake oven and replace it with one 

fired by natural gas at a total heat input rate of 2 million 

Btu/hr. 

2.	 Visible emissions from any point or fugitive emission source 

associQ.;:ed with the .;.:;ove emission points shall not exceed 10\ 

opacity. Opacity observation of emissions from stationary sources 

shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 

9. 

3.	 The following operation limits shall not be exceeded without prior 

approval in accordance with Section 3.1, UACR: 

A.	 Dip tank 

1.	 144 gallons of varnish per 12 month period 

2.	 8 hours per day 

3.	 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period 

B.	 Paint spray booth #1 

1.	 120 gallons of paint per 12 month period 

2.	 8 hours per day 

3.	 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period 

C.	 Paint spray booth #3 

1.	 800 gallons of paint per 12 month period 

2.	 8 hours per day 

3.	 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period 

8 

4.2.4-862 
D.	 Bake oven 

1.	 2.2 million SCF of natural gas per 12 month period 

2.	 2.0 million BTUjhr heat input 

3.	 8 hours per day 

4.	 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period 

Compliance with the annual limitations shall be determined on a 

rolling monthly total. On the first day of each month a new 12 

month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. 

Records of production shall be kept for all periods when the plant 

is in	 operation. Records of production shall be made available to 

the Executive Secretary or his representative upon request, and 

shall	 include a period of two years ending with the date of the 

request. Fuel consumption for the bake oven shall be determined by 

the use of records from a fuel meter. VOC emissions shall be 

determined by maintaining a record of paints, solvents, and varnish 

used. The records shall be kept on a daily basis. Hours of ..... ~'=?_~"::":.-- ~h~ll ....... ,.... ~O"'~:-:-:~:'.~d bv .. :7~;V'~t="r-o~ ~':':'r:!~~~":",j,,,!!'""" ~_-4
 

maintaining of an operations log. 

4.	 The total VOC emissions from sources listed in this approval order 

shall not exceed 4.70 tons per l2-month period without prior 

approval in accordance with Section 3.1, UACR. Compliance with the 

limitation shall be determ~ned using a material balance procedure on 

a rolling monthly ~otal. On first day of each month a new 12 month 

total shall be calcula~ed using the previous 12 months. The total 

VOC emissions shall be determined by maintaining a record of paints, 

varnish, thinners, and solvents used, and of operation parameters 

from other affected VOC emissions sources. The record shall include 

the following data for each item used: 

A.	 Name of paint, varnish, thinner, or solvent 

B.	 weight in pounds per gallon 

C.	 Percent VOC by weight 

D.	 Amount used on a daily basis 

Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the plant 

is in operation. Records of consumption shall be made available to 

the Execut i ve Secretary or his representati ve upon request, and 

shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the 

request. The VOC emissions from paints/varnish/thinners/solvents 

shall not exceed 4.69 tons per 12 month period. The VOC emissions 

from other processes shall not exceed 0.01 tons per 12 month period. 

5.	 Paint spray booths #1 and #3 shall be equipped with a set of paint 

arrestor particulate filters to control particulate emissions. All 

air exiting either booth shall pass through a paint arrestor control 

system before being vented to the atmosphere. 

6.	 The owner/operator shall operate the dip tank in following manner: 

A.	 The cover shall remain closed at all times except during 

actual loading, unloading, or transfer operations. 

B.	 Parts shall be completely drained in the internal draining 

rack until all dripping ceases. 

C.	 Waste or used varnish shall be stored in covered containers 

and disposed _ 5 De~hod which prevents VOC emissions to the 

atmosphere. 

9 

4.2.4-863 
-
 D.	 Tanks, containers, and all associated equipment shall be 

maintained in good operating condition, and leaks shall be 

repaired immediately. 

E.	 Written procedures for the operation and maintenance of the 

dip tank shall be posted in an accessible and apparent 

location near the equipment. 

7.	 Eighteen months from the date of this approval order the Executive 

Secretary shall be notified in writing of the status of construction 

of this project unless the construction is complete and operation 

has commenced. 

B.	 A copy of this approval order shall be maintained on-site and 

available to the operators. 

9.	 All installations and facilities authorized by this approval order 

shall be adequately and properly maintained. 

10.	 The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon start-up 

of the installation, as an initial compliance inspection is 

required. 

Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be 

approved in accordance wit Section 3.1.1, UACR. 

This approval order in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability 

for compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations 

including the Utah Air conservation Regulations. 

"Allowable emissions" as defined in Section 1.12, UACR, for sources listed in 

this approval order are calculated at 0.01 tons/yr for particulates, 0.01 tons/yr ­

for PM10 , 0.0006 tons/yr for 502' 0.10 tons/yr for NO., 0.02 tons/yr for CO, and 

4.70 tons/yr for VOCs. These calculations are for the purposes of determining 

the applicability of PSD and nonattainment area major source requirements of the 

UACR. They are not to be used for purposes of determining compliance. 

CARL 

HILL.ENG 

10 

4.2.4-864 
MEMORANDUM 

FROM: 

TO Donald E. 

Tim Blanchard;) 

Robinson, Manager. 

Environmental 

Engineering Section, 

Health Engineer 

BAQ 

SUBJECT: Modify an 

Tank, Bake Oven, 

Intent to Approve 

and Paint B

for 

ooth 

Hill AFB Building 1701. Dip 

DATE: January 2, 1991 

=~===~==========================~===================================~===========

On October 19, 1990 a change to the dip tank specifications was received by the 

BAQ. The change was not incorporated into the subject Intent to Approve sent to 

James R. Van Orman at Hill AFB on December 7, 1990. The modified NOI indicated 

that the new dip tank would be installed above ground rather than underg~ound.

Because the tank is being installed above ground the cathodic protection and leak 

detection system will not be installed. The dimensions of the tank were reduced 

from 7 feet inside diameter to 4 feet inside diameter, and from 7 feet high to 

4 feet high. The tank will now be a double wall construction. The capacity is 

reduced from 2000 gallons to 370 gallons. The emissions from the tank will less 

because the surface area has been reduced. December 21, 1990 a letter reflecting 

the above information was sent in as part of the public comment process. 

4.2.4-865
 
...,.. vv_ 

zuc::;.c .- .-.. _~--- "_ r ...... • .:...: ­

21 DEC 19S0 

Date

I

. . 

Mr F Burnell Cordner, Execu-cive Sec-::et:a..ry
 

Bureau of Air Qualir;y
 

1950 west North T~le
 

PO Box 16690
 

Salt Lake City, UT 84116-0690
 

RE: Public COlI!lIlents on Intent to Approve building UOI, Dip T.s.nk. Bake Oven &
 

Paint: Boo'ths.
 

Dear Mr Cordner 

Referenced Inten't to Approve da~eci 7 Dec 90, we offer ~he follow~ng publ~c
 

comments for your consideration
 

Condition 1.A. -.Per our 18 OC't 90 le~ter, ~ual wall dip ~riK shall be 370
 

gallon capacity measuring approximately 4 feet inside dis~ete~ Qnd 4 feet
 

high. The tank ~l be locat:ed above ground, therefore. cathcdic p=otect:ion
 

will not: be providecL The taDk ","ill be provided .......i11:J c:. sealed clam type lid,
 

out:Side F~ liquid circulating t}~e agit~t:ion, electri~ heat:er and .s. Vent:
 

sys'l:em.
 

Condition 4 - Our estimation of voe ~missions f=om sources lis~ed in this
 

Intent to A.pprove is 3.• 28 tons per year. Revised VOG evapora.;:i··..e ",missions
 

from the dip ~e as follo~s:
 

Unco~~rolled AP-42 Emission Fac~or 0.15 Lb VOCjHr, F~~
 

Evaporative area (revised) X (4)2~ 12.56 Ft:2
 

t. 

Operating hOllIS abou't 1,000 hrs/Y~ Uncont~ollad evaporative less .15 Lb X 12.56 Ft7. X 1,000 h=s X Ton 

hr, Ft:2 2,000 Lbs 

'"" 0.94 Ton/yr 

". -. 

.. Emission ReduCtion Fac'l:or 30-60: use 40% 

·.Eva.porative voe e.m:f"~s~oris· O.94-X .6 = .56 TonfYr 

". '~Dip t:ank· usage Loss--:(NOI) = .06 Ton/Yr 

.. _::.,' ,.. Paint:. bOoth 'ifl.voc:.:eInissicn.s (NO!) - :12 + .34 = :4.6 TonjYr 

. . ..-:Baldng Oven VOC·.·wisions (NOI) =- .12 Toofi~ . 

..__>:: .?aint: booth f}3 voe ·emissioIlS (NOl) 2.08· Tons/fr. 

_~_Tota1. vOC ",missions. ... 0.56 +.06 + .~6 .l2 7 2.08 .' "-' ..:. ". 

3.28 'torisjY:::: . . . . . . ­ ;.~ >:.:.:-.:;, :'~'''' .:...~...:•. " .. "- ,:" ..... ;: .", .;-'~. .•.. -." .. :. :' .. 

;_;I:f·Y<?~ have any questi~·/~pfease feel free.·to~on:.cact Jay .Gupta a.~:7T7;'6.917. : '--~: ,_.-:~:;.,_. .';". . ..". .' ... :::~. -. .:."~''''.~ --: .... 

4.2.4-866 .,. ...... 

", '"'- . 

·~!zf~~f~2!?-···· . 
DEPARTMENT OFTHE AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER (AFLCl

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH 84056-5990 O ~j 1990

Mr F. Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary sef 1 8 1990 

Bureau of Air Quality 

288 North 1460 West 

PO Box 16690 

Salt Lake City, DT 84116-0690 

RE: Notice of Intent to Construct a Dip Tank, Bake Oven and Paint Booth 

Modification - Bldg 1701 

Dear Mr Cordner 

On 27 April 90 we submitted the reference NOI. We have made several calls to 

your consultant, Tetra Tech, Inc in California. According to Tetra Tech. this 

NOI was processed by them and sent to UBAQ on 9 Sep 90. We wish to commence 

construction on this project during Nov 90. We, therefore, request an 

expeditious review and issue of an approval order. 

Also, due to a design change, please note that the double wall dip tank will 

be located above ground and not underground as stated in our original NOI. 

New dip tank shall be 4' inside diameter, 6' outside diameter and 4' in 

height. A sealed clam type lid will be provided as before. Dip tank will be 

equipped with a ventilation system, as stated before, installed on the upper 

side portion of the tank. Exhaust vent will be 6" diameter approximately 

55'-60' above ground. Exhaust volume is estimated to be 100 cubic feet per 

minutes. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jay Gupta at 777-6917. 

4.2.4-867 

AFLC-- COMr..;.;.. STRENGTH THROUGH LOGISTICS 
--

1LLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

1701 

AUG-28-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: NET EMISSION INCREASES 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC X CNTRL LBS/IlR TONS/YR 

TOTAL PARTICULATE ••••••.•••• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 

PM-10 •••••••••••••••••••••• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 

SOx ••.••••••••.••••••••••••• 0.0012 0.00 0.0006 0.00 0.00 0.0012 0.0006 

NOx ••••••••.•••••••••••.•••• 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 

CO •••••••••••••••••••••.••.• 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 

VOC, NON-METHANE •.•••••••••• 4.06 0.51 2.03 0.06 36.23 6.37 3.19 

VOC, METHANE •••••••••.•••••• 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 

SOURCE: 

TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

TOTAL PRE-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

4.2.4-868
 
?LLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

1701 

AUG-28-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL PRE·MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC X CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

TOTAL PARTiCULATE ••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

PM-10 •••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

SOx .•.•••.••••••••••.•••••.• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

NOx ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

CO •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

VOC, NON-METHANE ••••••••••.• 5.34 0.67 2.67 0.08 0.00 5.34 2.67 

VOC, METHANE •.•.•••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

SOURCE: 

PAINT SPRAY BOOTH #1 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION 

PAINT SPRAY BOOTH #3 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION 

4.2.4-869
 
-


.HROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

1701 

AUG-28-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 1 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HooRLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.70 0.09 0.35 0.01 0.00 0.70 0.35 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.'-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: PAINT 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE ••••••••••.. 5.80 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

V(~) (VOC CONTENT) ••••• 78.80 X (VOC DENISTY OF COATINGS)/(COATING DENSITY)*100 

COATING DENSITy ....•.. 7.36 LBS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALBE 4.2.2.1-1 

USAGE RATES •..••••..•••.•... 120.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 

0.12 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/WEEK)/(~EEKS/YR)

HooRS OF OPERATION 

KOORS PER DAy ..•••.•.•••••• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI 

DAYS PER ~EEK ••••••..•••••• 5 DAYSNEEK FROMNOI 

~EEKS PER YEAR •..••..•.••.• 52 ~EEKS/YEAR FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR ..•......•..• 1000 HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI. INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

4.2.4-870
 
c-.cJ\IITROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOl!:	 FILE: 1701 

DATE: AUG-28-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 3 . PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION
 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE
 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701
 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HClJRLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC X CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 4.64 0.58 2.32 0.07 0.00 4.64 2.32 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1
 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOORCES
 

4.2 SURFACE COATING
 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING
 

PAINT TYPE: VOC CONTENT OF PAINT RANGED 3.2 TO 5.8 LBS/GAL
 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE ••••••••••.• 5.BO LBS/GAL FROM NOI, ASSUMED HIGHEST VALUE 

vex) evoc CONTENT) ••••• 78.BO X (VOC DENISTY OF COATINGS)/eCOATING DENSITY)-100 

COATING DENSITy ••••••• 7.36 LBS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALBE 4.2.2.1-1 

USAGE RATES ••••••••••••••••• BOO.OO GAL/YR FROM NOI
 

O.BO GAL/HR eGAL/YR)/(HClJRS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EK)/e~EKS/YR)
 

.• :> OF OPERATION 

HClJRS PER DAy •••••••••••••• 8 HClJRS/DAY FROM NOI
 

DAYS· PER WEEK •••••••••••••• 5 DAYS/~EK FRtJ4 NOI
 ~EKS PER YEAR ••••••••••••• 52 ~EKS/YEAR FRtJ4 NOI
 

HOURS PER YEAR ••••••••••.•• 1000 HClJRS/YEAR FRtJ4 NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

4.2.4-871
 
~ROLLED AND U~CONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

OATE: 

TIME: 

1701 

AUG-28-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

ESTIMATE 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HClJRLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC X CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

TOTAL PARTICULATE ••.••.•••.• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 

PH-10 ••••.•••••••••••••••.. 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 

SOx •• , ••••••••• " ••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

NOx •• , ••• ' ..••••••••••••••.• 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 

CO • ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 

VQC, NON-METHANE •••••••••••• 9.40 1. 18 4.70 0.14 19.71 11. 71 5.85 

VQC, HETHAME •••••••.••••••.• 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 

SClJRCE: 

DIP TANK - USAGE LOSS 

DIP TANK - EVAPORATION LOSS 

PAINT SPRAY BOOTH '1 • USAGE LOSS FROM OIP TANK 

PAINT SPRAY BOOTH '1 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION 

PAINT SPRAY BOOTH #3 • PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION 

BAKE OVEN - USAGE LOSS FROM DIP TANK 

BAKE OVEN - NATURAL GAS FIRED 

4.2.4-872
 
(ROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

1701 

AUG-28-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: DIP TANK - USAGE LOSS 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.12 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.06 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED 

PAINT TYPE: VARNISH 

SURFACE COATING 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE 

V(~) •••••••••••••••••• 

COATING DENSITy •.•.•.. 

4.10 

50.00 

8.20 

LBS/GAL 

LBS/GAL 

V(%)*(CDATING DENSITY)/100 

FROM NOI 

. FROM NOI 

USAGE RATES ••••••••..••••••. 144.00 

0.14 

GAL/YR 

GAL/HR 

FROM NOI 

(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/IIEEK)/(~EKS/YR)

USAGE LOSS AT DIP TANK •.•••. 20.00 % FROM NOI, ASSUMED REMAIN 80% OF USAGE LOSS 

OCCURRED AT PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AND BAKE OVEN 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy ••.••..••...•. 

DAYS PER ~EEK •••••..•••..•. 

~EEKS PER YEAR ••..••.•..•.. 

HOURS PER YEAR .••..••...... 

8 

5 

52 

1000 

HOURS/DAY 

DAYS/IIEEK 

IIEEKS/YEAR 

HOURS/YEAR 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI, 

FE~ HOURS 

INTERMITTENT OPERATION· 

A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

4.2.4-873 
~OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 1701 

DATE: AUG-28-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: DIP TANK - EVAPORATION LOSS 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC X CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 3.46 0.44 1.73 0.05 40 s.n 2.88 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.6 SOLVENT DEGREASING 

TABLE 4.6-2 SOLVENT LOSS EMISSION FACTORS FOR DEGREASING OPERATIONS 

TYPE: OPEN TOP VAPOR WITH A COVER 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE •••••••••••• 0.15 LB/HR/FT2 TABLE 4.6-2 

EVAPORATIVE AREAS ••...• 38.47 FT2 FROM NOI, BASED ON 7 FEET DIAMETER 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

~~IRS PER DAy .•••••.••••••• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI 

PER ~EEK •••••••••••••• S DAYS/IlEEK FROM NOI 

PER YEAR •••••••.••••• 52 IlEEKS/YEAR FROM NOI .~ PER YEAR •.••••••••••• 1000 HOURS/YEAR	 FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY
 

4.2.4-874
 
'OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 1701 

DATE: AUG-28-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 1 - USAGE LOSS FROM DIP TANK 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOORLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC X CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 0.24 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOORCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: VARNISH 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE ••••••••.••• 4.10 LBS/GAL	 veX)*eCOATING DENSITY)/100 

vex) •.•. '...•..•....... 50.00 X FROM NOI
 

COATING DENSiTy .•••••. 8.20 LBS/GAL FROM NOI
 

U~4GE RATES ••••••••••••••••• 144.00 GAL/YR	 FROM NOI 

0.14 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR)

~c LOSS FROM DIP TANK •••. 40.00 X FROM NOI, 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy .•••••.•••.•.• 8 HOURS/DAY	 FROM NOI 

DAYS PER ~EEK •.••••.••••••. 5 DAYS/~EK	 FROM NOI 

UEEKS PER YEAR .•••.•••••••. 52 ~EEKS/YEAR	 FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR .••••••••.•.. 1000 HOURS/YEAR	 FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

4.2.4-875
 
(ROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 1701 

DATE: AUG-28-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 1 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

vee non METHANE	 0.70 0.09 0.35 0.01 0.00 0.70 0.35 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: PAINT 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE •••••••••••• 5.80 LBS/GAL	 FROM NOI 

veX) (VOC CONTENT) ••••• 78.80 X (VOC DENISTY OF COATINGS)/(COATING	 DENSITY)·,00 

COATING DENSiTy ••••••• 7.36 LBS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALBE 4.2.2.1-1 

USAGE RATES •••••••••••••••.• 120.00 GAL/YR	 FROM NOI 

0.12 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR)

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy •.••••.•••...• 8 HOURS/DAY	 FROM NOI 

DAYS PER ~EEK •••••.•••••.•• 5 DAYS/~EEK	 FROM NOI 

~EEKS PER YEAR ••••.••••••.. 52 ~EEKS/YEAR	 FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR •••.••••..••. 1000 HOURS/YEAR	 FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFE~ HOURS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

4.2.4-876
 
'OLLED A~D UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 1701 

DATE: AUG-28-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 3 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATIOH 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC X CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 4.64 0.58 2.32 0.07 0.00 4.64 2.32 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: VOC CONTENT OF PAINT RANGED 3.2 TO 5.8 LBS/GAL 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE •••••••••.•. 5.80 LBS/GAL	 FROM NOI, ASSUMED HIGHEST VALUE 

vex) (VOC CONTENT) ..••• 78.80 X (VOC	 DENISTY OF COATINGS)/(COATING DENSITY)*100 

COATING D~NSITY ••••••• 7.36 LBS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALSE 4.2.2.1-1 

UC:AGE RATES •••••••••••••.••. BOO.OO GAL/YR	 FROM NOI 

0.80 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EK)/(~EKS/YR)

"....uRS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy ••••••••••••.• 8 HOURS/DAY	 FROM NOI 

DAYS PER WEEK •••••••••••••• 5 DAYS/~EK	 FROM NOI 

WEEKS PER YEAR •••••••••.••• 52 WEEKS/YEAR	 FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR •••••••.•.••• 1000 HOURS/YEAR	 FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIOHFEW HOURS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

4.2.4-877
 
-~OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 1701 

DATE: AUG-28-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: BAKE OVEN - USAGE LOSS FROM DIP TANK 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB • BUILDING 1701 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 0.24 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: VARNISH 

CQ4MENTS 

VOC non METHANE .••••••••••. 4.10 LBS/GAL VC%)-CCOATING DENSITY)/100 

VCX) .•••••.••....•.•.• 50.00 % FROM NOI
 

COATING DENSiTy •••.••. 8.20 LBS/GAL FROM NOI
 

USAGE RATES •.•.•.•••••...•.. 144.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 

0.14 GAL/HR CGAL/YR)/CHOURSIDAY)/CDAYS/~EEK)/C~EKS/YR)

.c LOSS AT DIP TANK ••••.. 40.00 X FROM NOI, 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy •.•••••••••••• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI 

DAYS PER ~EEK •••••••••.•.•• 5 DAYS/~EK FROM NOI 

~EEKS PER YEAR ••••••..••••. 52 ~EEKS/YEAR FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR .•••••••••••. 1000 HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

4.2.4-878
 
ROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EHISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 1701 

DATE: AUG-28-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: BAKE OVEN - NATURAL GAS FIRED
 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE
 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 1701
 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL
 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR
 

TOTAL PARTiCULATE ••••••••••• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
 

PM-10 ...................... 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
 

SOx ••••••.•••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 

NOx••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10
 

CO ••••••, ••••••••••••••••••• 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02
 

YOC, NON-METHANE ••••.••••••• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
 

YOC, METHANE •••••••••••••••• 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
 

! FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 YOLUHE
 

_'TION 1 EXTERNAL COMBUSTION SOURCES
 

1.4 NATURAL GAS COMBUSTION
 

TABLE 1.4-1 UNCONTROLLED EMISSION FACTORS FOR NATURAL GAS COMBUSTION
 

FUEL TYPE: NATURAL GAS
 

EMISSION FACTOR IN	 LB PER MILLION CUBIC fEET 

TOTAL PARTiCULATE ••.•••••••• 5.00 LB/HH FT3 TABLE 1.4-1
 

PH-10 •••••••••••••••••••••• 5.00 LB/HH fT3 TABLE 1.4-1
 

SOx••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.60 LB/HH FT3 TABLE 1.4- 1
 

NOx •••••.••••••, •••••••••••• 100.00 LB/HM FT3 TABLE 1.4- 1
 

CO ••.••••••••••••.••.••.•••• 20.00 LB/HM FT3 TABLE 1.4- 1
 

YOC, NON-METHANE •.••.••••••• 5.30 LB/HH FT3 TABLE 1.4· 1
 

YOC, METKANE •••.••••.•••.••. 2.70 LB/HM FT3 TABLE 1.4- 1
 

TOTAL P~ER RATING .••••••• 2000.00 K BTU/HR FROM NOI
 

fUEL CONSUMPTION RATES .••. 0.00 MM FT3/HR (TOTAL POWER RATING)/(1000 BTU/FT3)/(HH)
 

2.00	 MH FT3/YR (TOTAL POUER RATING)/(1000 BTU/FT3)/(MM)* 

(ANNUAL OPERATING HOUR) 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

'IRS PER DAy ••••••••••••• 8.00 HRS/DAY .,...­ S PER WEEK ••••••••••••• 5.00 DAYS/IJEEK
 

,EKS PER yEAR ••••••••••.• 52.00 UEEKS/YR
 

4.2.4-879 HOURS PER yEAR •••••••••••• 1000.00 HRS/YR	 FROM NOJ, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW KOURS A DAY DURING DAY SKIFT ONLY
 
--"TROlLED AJI) lJIICD11TROLLED EMISSIDM ESTl"-,TfS felt: FILE 

DATE 

TlME 

1701 

Al)G·28-90 

9:00 All 

SClJICf: NET EMISSION IIICltEASlS 

ctJFlUIY NAMf: DEPT. OF TN£ AIR fORa 

LOCATION: HILL AF8 - BUILDING 1701 

UIICDIIT R<X.LED 

POlLUTANT lBS/HI 

HClJRLY 

GIAMS/5c:C TOIIStyR 

AMWJAl 

GRAMS/SEC I CNTRL LIS/Mil TCII5/TR 

TOTAL PARTICULATE •••••• ; •••• 

PM·10 •••••••••••••••••••.•• 

sox ...••••••••.••...•••••••• 

lriIOX ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 

co...•••••••••••.••.•.••...• 

vee, NQN·METKAHE •..•.••••••• 

VQC, METHAME •••••••••••••••• 

0.01 

0.01 

0.0012 

0.20 

0.04­

4.06 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

0.01 

0.51 

0.00 

0.01 

0.01 

0.0006 

0.10 

0.02 

2.03 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.06 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

36.23 

0.00 

0.01 

0.01 

0.0012 

0.20 

0.04 

6.37 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.0006 

0.10 

0.02 

3.19 

0.00 

saJRCE: 

TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSIOII ESTIMATE 

TCTAL PRE·MCDIFICATIOK EMISSION ESTIMATE 

4.2.4-880
 
-"TROLLED AlII) UIlCOl/TROLLED EJUSSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

1101 

A\JC-28·9Q 

9:00 AM 

S(UtCE: TOTAL PRE-MODIfICATION EMISSIOli 

CQMPANY!WE: DEPT. OF THE AIR fORa 

LOCATION: HILL AF8 • BUILDING 1701 

EsTIMATe 

CCNTItOlLED UllCON TROL LEO 

Poc.lUTAIiT LBS/HR 

MQJlU.T 

GINCS/~C TOMSIYR 

AIIIIIUAL 

GlANS/SEC X CNTRL lBS/NR TOIlS/YR 

TOTAL PARTICULATE ••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

PM-l0 •••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

SOx .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

1I0lt••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

co .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

vee, 

vex:. 

NON-METkAME •••••••••••• MET HAHE •••••••••••••••• 

5.34 

0.00 

0.67 

0.00 

2.67 

0.00 

0.08 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

5.34 

0.00 

2..67 

0.00 

SClJRCE ; 

PAINT SPRAT BOOTH '1 • PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION 

PAINT SPRAY SOOTH 13 • PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION 

4.2.4-881
 
-


MTROLLEl) AHtl UHCOMTROl.LS EMISSIClW ESTIMATES fOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

1701 

AUG· 28·90 

9:00 AM 

saJlCE: PAINT SPlAT BOOTH 1 • PAINT sPUTING OPERATION 

CQIIPANT!WE: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORa: 

LOCATION: HILL AF8 • BUILDJlIG 1701 

COllT ROU EO UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

MClJRLT 

CRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GR~S/SEC CMTRL LBi/HR TOilS/TR 

vot non METIWC£ 0.70 0.09 0.35 0.01 0.00 0.70 0.35 

AP·42 FOJRTN EDl nON 5CPT. 1985 \'Ol\.lil( 

SECTICII 4 EVlPClRATlOli LOSS SClJlCES 

4.2 SURFACE CQlTlNG 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 'lOt EMISSIONS FOR UJlCOIiTllOlLED SURFACf 

PAINT TYPE: PAIIT 

COATING 

CCMM£NTS 

VDC non METHANE •••••••••••• 5.80 liS/GAL fll~ 1/01 

Vex) (VOC CONTENT) .•... 78.80 I (VOC DEMISTl OF COATINGS)/CCOATING DENSITY)·,00 

~TtNG OENSITY ••••••• 7.36 liS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALSE 4.2.2.1·1 

USAGE LATES ••••••••••••••••• 120.00 CiAl/T1! FROM ItOI 

0.12 GAl/HR CGAl/TR)/(HOURSIOAY)/(DAYS~E()/CWEE(SIYR)

IlaJRS OF OP£RATIOII 

ICCLJiS Pel OAT •••••••••••••• a IIWIS/DAT fR(Jl 1101 

O.TS PEl WEEK •••••••••••••• 5 OATS/WEEK FRCII NOI 

WEEKS PER T~R ••••••••••••• 52 WEEICSIYEAI FROM 101 

HOURS PER TEAR ••••.•••••... 1000 HQJRS/YeAJl FROM MOl, INTERMITTENT oPERATIOIIFFW KOURS A OAT DURING OAT SNIFT ONLT 

4.2.4-882
 
UIlCXJITROLL£l) EMISSION UTIMATES FOIl:	 filE: 17'01 

DATE: AUG'28·90 

TIME: 9:00 "" 

E: PAIIlT SPlAY SCOT" 3 • PAINT $PUYING OPERATION
 

IIY IWCE: ~PT. OF THE All fORet
 

ION: HILL .FI - BUILDING 17'01
 

UIlCONTROLLEO 

IIOJIlLY UT~T lSS/HI ClWCS/SEC TONSIYIt LIS/KR TOIIS/YR 

non lefTHAIlE •••••••••••• 4.64 o.sa	 2.32 0.07 0.00 2.32 

102 FCIJlTIl OlnON SEPT. 1985 YOU_ 1
 

TJOII 4 EVAPCIUflQI LOSS SOURCES
 . SUltfAC£ COATING
 

II.E 4.2.2.1'1 vee EMISSIONS FOR UtlcalTlO&.W UFAa CQATJlIG
 

faIT TYPE: VOC alNTENT OF PAINT RANGE!) 3.2 TO 5.8 LBS/GAL
 

C non METH~E .••••••••••. 5.80 laS/GAL Faa4 1101, ASSlJIEll HIGHEST VALUE 

V(~) (VCC COWTENT) ••••. 7'8.80 (vee O£»I$TT Of ca.TIWGS)/(CCATING OENSITY)-100 

COATIXG DE»5ITY ••••••. 7.36 US/GAL OEFAm.T VALUE fRCJl TALU 4.2.2. ,., 

:$ACE RATES . 800.00 GAllYi FRCIC 1101
 

0.&0 GAL/Hi (GAL/YR)/(HOURSIOAT)/(OAYS~E~}/(WEE~S/YR)
 

rQ.... .Jf OP£IAT10M 

HaJRS PER DAy •••••••••••••• 8 HCllISIDAY	 fllClC 1101 

DAYS PER WEEr •••••••••••••• 5 DATSJ1IUl	 FRCIC 1101 

WEEKS PER TEAl ••••••••••••• 52 WEEKS/YW	 FJ(JI 1101 

HOURS PER TEAR ••••••••••••• 1000 HOURS/YEAR	 fROM 1101, INTnIlITTENT OPEllATtOll· 

FEW HOURS A DAY OURING DAY SHIFT OWLY 

4.2.4-883
 
'OUED AND UNCONTROlLED EMISSIOII ESTrMATES fOR: FILE: 

DA~:

rUE: 

1701 

AUG' 28-9Q 

9:00 N4 

SCJJRCE: TOTAL POST-1Gl I ffCATrOll. EMISSION 

CtlMPAilY KAME: DEPT. Of THE All FCRee 

LOCATION: HILL AFB • BUILDING 1101 

ESTIMATE 

COIITRQ.lED UIICCllIITROlLED 

POLLUTANT LIS/Hit 

IlClJIlLT 

GlANS/SEC TOMS/YI 

AlillUAl 

GRAMS/SEC % ClITRL LaS/Hit TOMS/YR 

TOTAL PARTICULATE ••••••••••• 

PM·10 ••.••••••.••••••••..•• 

sox••••••••••••.••••.••••••• 

NOx••••••••••••••••••••••••• 

CD •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 

YO(, NON·METHAXE •.•.•••..••• 

vce:, METIlANE •••••••••••••••• 

0.01 

0.01 

0.00 

0.20 

0.04 

9.40 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

0.01 

1. 18 

0.00 

0.01 

0.01 

0.00 

0.10 

0.02 

4.70 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.14 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

19.7' 

0.00 

0.01 

0.01 

0.00 

0.20 

0.04 

11.7'1 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.00 

O. '0 

0.02 

5.&5 

0.00 

Sl1JRce: 

DIP TANI: • uSAGE LOSS
 

DIP TAMil: • evAPClltATIOII Lost
 

PAINT SPRAT 800TH " • I.OSS fR(Jl DIP TAIII:
 

PAINT SHAT Boon t1 • PAINT SPlATING OPUATIc.
 

PAUIT sPRAY IIQ)TH f3 . PAIIiT SfIItATJMG QPfItATIc.
 

BAKE Mil • USACE LOSS FRCIt DIP TA*:
 

BAKE Mil - IlATUlAL liAS FIRED
 

4.2.4-884
 
~ROLLEO AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSIOM ESTIMATES fCK: flU;: 

DATE: 

TItE: 

1701 

AUG-Z8'90 

9:00 Nt 

SOURCE: DIP TANr: - USAGE lOSS 

CCIIPANY NAMe: DEPT. Of TKf AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB • BU1L01MG 1701 

UNCONTROl.LEO 

POL.LlJTAHT LiS/IlR 

HOJItLY 

CiUIlS/SEC TOliS/y1l 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC CNTRl LBS/HR TOIIS/YR 

VO' non METIWIE 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.06 

AJl·42 FaJRTH EDlTlC)II SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION L.OSS saJaCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VlX f)(ISSICNS FOIl UMCOIlTROLLED 

PA111T TYPE: VARNISH 

SURFAC£ COATING 

CCH&EIlTS 

vee non METHANE •••••••••••. 

ves) •••••••••••••••••• 

COlTING DEWSITY ••••••• 

4.10 

50.00 

15.20 

L.as/GAL. 

% 

LSS/GAl 

V(%)*(COATING DENSITT)!100 

fROl NOI 

FRQlII NOI 

OSAGE RATES ••.•••••.••.••... 144.00 

0.14 

GALin 

GAL/HR 

FROM N01 

eGAl/YR)!eHOURS!DAY)/eDATSIWEEr:)/eWEE~S/YR)

USAGE lOSS AT DIP TAN( •..... 20.00 FROM N01, ASSUMED REMAIN 80" OF USAGE LOSS 

OCCURRED AT PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AND SAXE OVEN 

HClJIS OF OPEItAT 1011 

HaulS PER OAT ••••••••...•.• 

OATS PER WEE{ •••••...•••••• 

WEE~S PER TEAR ••••••••••••• 

MOUltS PER YEAR ••••••••••••• 

8 

5 

52 

1000 

IIOJtS/llAY 

DA'fs/wn 

WfEKS/TW 

1l000S/TEAR 

FrtOK N01 

FRQlII 1IQ1 

FROM 1101 

FROM 1101. IIITERMITTEIIT OPERATIOIlFEW HOURS A OAT DURING CAT SHIfT ONLY 

4.2.4-885 
"-'TROLLED AIlO UllCONTROlLfD EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE 17Q1 

DATE 100-28,90 

TIME 9:00 Nt 

SQJRCE: DIP TANI: • EVAPOItATIOIII lOSS
 

COMPANY NAM:: DEPT. Of THE All FOIlCE
 

LOCATION: MILL AFe • BUILDING 1701
 

COIITIOlLEO	 WlCOMTROLLEO 

HaJRLY AlUIUAL 

POUUTANT LIS/HI GRAMS/SEC TOIS/YI GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TOMS/Yll 

VOC non METIWI£	 3.46 0.44 1.73 0.05 40 5.n 2.88 

AP'42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 19!'S YOLlJIE 1
 

S£cnON 4 EVAPCflATlCII LOSS SOURCES
 

4.6 SOLVENT DEGIIWING 

TAiLE 4.6-2 SOLVbT LOSS fJUSSION FACTORS F<lI OEGR.EASING OPERATIONS 

. TYPE: OPEN TOP VAPCl WITH A COV9 

ctIItENTS 

VOC: non METHANE •••••••••••• 0.15 LJ/HR/FT2 TABLE 4.6·Z 

EVAPORATIVE AREAS •••••• 31.47 HZ FItCIC NOI. BASED 011 7 FEET OIAMETfi 

HC1lRS OF OPERA11 C* 

MOURS PER CAy •••••••••••••. a He:gS/DAT FIIQM MOl
 

DAYS PER WEEK •••••••.••••.. 5 CAYSMEK FIIQM 1101
 

'$ PEl Y£AI ••••••••••••• 52 \EEKSIYEAR FR(JII 1101
 

; PER VEAl ••••••••••••• 1000 HaJRSIYEAR	 FRO!' 1101. INTEItMJTTEJfT OPERATION'
 

FEW ~s 1 DAY DUltING OAT $111FT ONLY
 

-
 , 4.2.4-886
 
-"TROLLED AND UIICOIITROlLED EMISSICII ESTIICATES FOR:	 FILE 1701 

DATE AtJ(i·28-90

TIME 9:00 .,. 

SWRa;: PAlllT SPRAY BOOTH 1 • USAGE LOSS FItQIII DIP TAJlI:
 

COMPAllT IIAAE: DEPT. Of TIlE AIR fORCE
 

lOCATlOM: HILL Afa • 8UIL..DIIIG 1101
 

COIfTROllEO	 U)ICOIjTROlLED 

ItWItLY AMJIUAl 

POLLUTANT LiS/lUI GlAMS/S£C TCIIS/YR GlWlS/SEC:l ClCTRL lBS/Kll TONS/TI 

VOC non METHANE	 0.24 a.C13 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12 

AP·42 FCUlTIf EX)ITICII SUT. 1985 VOLlJE 1
 

se:crIQII It EVAl'atATICIN LOSS $ClJRcES
 

4.2 SURFACE COlTIMG
 

TABLE 4.2.2.1'1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UllC01/TlOc.LED SURfACE COATING
 

PAINT T1P£: VARNI'" .
 

CCMCEIITS 

'IOC non METHAJU: •••••••••••• 4.10 LiS/CAl VeX)·CCOATING oeNSlTT)/1CO 

vex) ......•........... so. 00 x fRCJI 1lO1
 

COATING DENSITY ••••••• 8.20 liS/GAL FROM MOl
 

USAGE RAtES . 144.00 GAJ./YR fRat NOI 

0.14 GAL/HI (GAl/YR)/{HOURS/DlY)/(DAYS/WEEK)/(WEECS!TR) 

: lOSS FROM DIP TANK •••• 40.00 X FRCIll 1101, 

HClJRS of OPERATJOII 

ijQURS PER DAy ••••••••••••.• a HWISIDAT FRQI 1101
 

DAYS PER WEEr •••••••••••••• 5 I)AYSI\IEEl FItCJl 1101
 ~E~S PER YEAR ••••••••••••• 52 \oE£(S/TEAR FRCJI 1101
 

HOuRs PER YEAR ..•...••••••. 1000 HOURS/YW FtOM 1101, INTERMITTENT OPf'ATION'
 

FEW IlOlJIS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

4.2.4-887
 
......TROlLED AJilD UIIICClNTROL1.ED EJUSSIOll ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILii: 170' 

DATE: AOO-28-9O 

TIMe: 9:00 AM 

SCLIlcE: PAIIlT SPRAT SOOTH 1 • PAINT SPlATING OPEJlATtQal 

alMPAJIT IIAM£: OfJ'T. Of THE AU fOlCE 

LOCATtON: KILL AF8 - 8lJ1UlIIllG 1701 

CONTROlLED	 UMCCNTROl.W 

HClJR1. Y AlillUAl 

POLLUTAJiT l.SS/Hl GRAMS/SEC TONS/Yll GRAMS/SeC CNTRI. LBS/KR TONS/Til 

voc: non ICETKANE	 0.70 0.09 0.35 0.01 0.00 0.70 0.35 

AP-42 faJRTH EOlTlOII SEP1. 1m VOLL.ME 

SECTION 4 EVAPClRATIOll LOSS St1JRCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2. '-1 VOC EIUSSIOllS fOR UNCONTROlLED SURFACI: COATING 

PAlllT TYPE: PAINT 

CCJMNlS 

YOC non METWE •••••••••••• 5.80 LIS/GAL	 AlClC NOI 

V(~) CYCC CONTENT) ••••• 78.80 X (YCC	 OEMISTY Of COATIIIGS)/CCQATING DEIlSITT)·100 

COATINC Of..S1TY ••••••• 7.36 l.8S/lal DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALBE 4.2.2,'-1 

USAGE ItAlES . 120.00 GAL/TR	 FRCIC 1101 

0.12 GA1./HR (GAl./lR)/CHOURSIOAT)/CDATS/WEEr::)/(WEEr::S/YR) 

lIQJRS OF QP£RATIQN 

HOURS PER DAy •••••••••••••• a HClJRS/DAT	 FROM 1101 

DAYS PER WEEK •••••••••••••• 5 DAT5MEK	 FRCIC 1101 

WEEr::S PEll TEAR ••••••••••••• 52 WE£(S/TUI	 FRCJt 1101 

HOURS PER TEAl ••••••••••••• 1000 HOUIlS/YEAR	 FROM 1101, IIlTERMITTENT oPERATIONFEW HOURS A OAT DUAING DAY SHIFT ONLY 

-


4.2.4-888
 
'.LLED ANO UtlCCIfTROLlEO EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR; FILE 

DATE 

TIME 

-17'01 

AUG· 28-9Q 

9:00 AM 

SWRCE. PAINT SPRAy 8COTH 3 - PAINT SPlATING ePERATION 

lX»IPANY NAME: D£PT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATIOW: KILL AF. - BUILDING 1701 

COIlTROLLm UIlCONTROU.ED 

POLLUTANT lIS/HR 

HClJR LY 

CRAMS/lifC TONS/YR 

AIlIlUAL 

GIAI4S/SEC X OIT1L LBS/IIR TOIlS/YR 

'IOC non METHAJlE 4.64 0.508 2.32 0.01 0.00 4.64 

AP'42 FCURTN EDITION SUT. 1985 VOI.LIE 1 

SEc:TIOII 4 EVlPQRATlOli LOSS saJIl.CES 

4.2. SURFACE COATING 

TAau. 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISS[OIIS UNCOtTROlLEO SUlFA~ COATIIiG 

PAIIIT TYPE: vee CONTEWT OF PAINT RANGED 3.2 TO 5.8 UBS/GAl 

vee non METHANE •••••••••••• 

vex) {YDC CONTENT) ••••• 

COATIIiG DENSITY ••••••• 

I,ISAGE RATES••••••••••••••••• ,­

n.xJRS Of OP£RATlOll 

HOURS PER OAT •••••••••••••• DAYS PER WEft •••••••••••••• 

WEEXS PER YEAR •••••••••••.. 

HOURS PER YEAR ••••••••••••• 

5.80 L.IS/GAL 

7'8.80 

7.36 LSS/GAL 

800.00 GAL./Tl 

0.80 GAL/HI 

8 IICUlS/DAY


5 DAYS/WEEI::
 

52 1oUK'S/YiAR
 

1000 HClJRSIYEAR 

(XlIIIIIEIiTS 

FROC MOl. ASSUIED NIGMEST VALUE 

(YOC OEIiISTT Of COATII1GS)/CCCATIIIG DENSITT,·100 

DEFAULT VALUE FROM TAlBE 4.2.2.1-1 

FRCM NOI 

(GAL/YR)/CMOURSIDAY)/COATS/WEEK)/CWEEKS/YR) 

FICIC 1101 

FRCM 1101 

flClM 1101 

FQ NO[, INTERMITTE11T OPfUTlOII' 

FEll HQJt$ A OAT IXJllllC OAT SMlfT ONL.Y 

4.2.4-889
 
'ROLLED AND UMCOlITROlLED aUSSIDeI ESTIMATES fOR: FILE 1101 

DATE AUCi'28-90 

TIME 9:00 AM 

saJRC£: BAn: OVEN· USAGf: LOSS FROM DIP TANIC 

COMPAY,. 1IlAMC: OEPT. Of THE AIR FORd: 

LOCATIOM: HILL AFI • BUILDING 1701 

COIl TROlL.fI) 

IlQ.IRLY AIUIUAL 

POlLUTAAIT LSS/A GlAMS/~C TOMS/TR GRAMS/SEC X CNTRL LBS/KR TOItS/TR 

'JOe non METHANE ............ 0.24 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12· 

AP·42 FCJJRTH £DITtON SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 

SECTION 4 ev~TlDeI LOSS SClURCES 

4.2 SURf~ COATIIIG 

TABLE 4.2.2.1·1 VOC EMISSIOIIS FOR UMCtIITItOlLED SURFACE COATINC 

PAINT TYPE: VARMISH 

allElTS 

vee non METHAME ..•..••••••• 4.10 LIS/GAl. Ve%)WeCOATIMG DENSITY)!100 

vex) ..........••.•••.. 

COATING DENSITY ••••••• 

50.00 

8.20 

X 

LIS/GAL 

flCll MOl 

FROM 101 

USAGE RATES ••••••••••••••••• 144.00 GAlIYR FICII MOl 

0.14 liAL./Ma eGAL/TX)!(HOURS/OATl!eDAYSIWEEK)/CWEEICS/TR) 

.Gf LOSS AT DIP TAMK •••••• 40.00 X FROM MOl, 

HaJtS OF ClPfRATlClM 

HouRS PER DAy •••••••••••••• OATS PER ~EK •••••••••••••• WEEKS PER TEAR ••••.•...•.•• 

a 

5 

5Z 

MCUlS/DAY

DAYS/WEK 

WEfItSITUl 

FIICJI 1101 

FRCI' MOl 

FICII MOl 

HOURS PER YEAR ••••..•.••••• 1000 IIOJR$/TW FROM MOl, INT£RICITTENT OPE~TtOllFew HOURS A DAY DUlING OAT SNIFT OILY 

4.2.4-890
 
COIlTROLLEtI AIlD UNCONTROLLED EMISSIOIII ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 1701 

OATE: AUG· 28-90 

~:oc !~

SWRCE: BArE ClYEtI • MATVUL CAS FIRED
 

ctWAJlY IlAICE: DePT. Of TKE AU fORCE
 

LOCATION: HILL AFB • BUILDING 1701
 

COMTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HClJRLY AIiIlUAL
 

POl.LUTANT LBS/1tR GlW(S/SCC TONS/YR GlWCS/SEC X OITRL lBS/HR TONS/TR
 

TOTAL PARTICULATE........... 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
 

PM-10 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
 

SOX........... .•••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 

MOl......................... 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.lO 0.10
 

CO............................................... 0.Q4. 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02
 

VOC, NON·METHANE............ 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
 

VOC, METIIAIIE................ 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
 

/·42 FQUaT" EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

UCTION , EXTElMAL	 CCtClIUSTlON SCUtCES 

1.4 MATUIAl. GAS alMIUSTION
 

TABLE 1.4" UNCOIfTROlL£l) EMISSION FACTORS FOR IlATlJIlAL GAS COMBUSTJOII
 

FUEL TYPE: NATURAl GAS
 

EMISSION FACTOR IN	 LB PB. MILl.ION OJIIC FEET 

TOTAL PARTICULATE ••••••••••• 5.00 LS/MM Fn TULE 1.4-1
 

PM-10 ••••••••••.....••••••• 5.00 La"" F13 TA8LE 1.4-1
 

SOx••••.••••••••••••.••..••• 0.60 La"" FT3 TA8l.E 1.4-'
 

KOx ................................................. 100.00 La"" H3 TABLE 1.4-1
 

ca................................................. , 20.00 LB/* F13 TAitE 1.4·1
 

VOC, NON·METKANE •••••••••••• 5.30 LB/* FT3 TABLE 1.4-1
 

vee, METHAJlE ................ 2.70 L8/* Fn TABLE 1.4,'
 

TOTAL POWER AATING•••••••• 2000.00 K BTU/HR FROM NOl 

FUEL CONSUlPTlOli RATES •••• 0.00 MM FT3/KR CTOTAL POWER RATING)/C1000 BTU/FT3)/CMM) 

2.00	 )1M FT31Y1t (TOTAL POWEi RATING)/C1000 8TV/FT3)/(MM)* 

(ANNUAL OPERATING KOUR) 

"elliS OF OPERATlQj 

,...-'- '~ PER DAy ••••••••••••• a.oo HIS/DAT 

DAYS PER WEE[•••••••••..•. 5.00 DAYS/WEEK 

WEEKS PER yEAR •••••••••••. 52.00 WEBS/YI 

HOURS PER yEAR •••••••••••• 1000.00 HRS/TI! FROM 1601, INTERMITTENT CP£AATIOW· 

FEW HOURS A DAY DURING DAY SHIFT OWLY 4.2.4-891