alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Countrywide Financial Corporation (the “Company”)for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Angelo R. Mozilo,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ ANGELO R. MOZILO |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Angelo R. Mozilo                    |
| Chief Executive Officer             |
| November 6, 2006                    |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toCountrywide Financial Corporation and will be retained by Countrywide FinancialCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
#### George RALSTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1133.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 20, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 1977.

*792Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Paul Morris, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of involuntary sexual battery after a jury trial. By this appeal, he contends that the trial court committed error in failing to respond to a question from the jury:

> “Could there be such a thing as implied consent? Is implied consent a defense?”

He further contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of all the evidence. We affirm.

As to the first point, the trial court correctly declined to respond to the question by the jury in regard to implied consent. Consent by the prosecutrix is a complete defense to the crime charged. The consent may be actual or implied. Whether or not the facts, as determined by the jury, support such a defense is for determination by the jury, and the trial court was not required to give a specific instruction on “implied consent”. *Danford v. State,*53 Fla. 4, 43 So. 593 (1907); *Lindberg v. State,*134 Fla. 786, 184 So. 662 (1938); *Wester v. State,*141 Fla. 374, 193 So. 303 (1940); *State v. Bryan,*287 So.2d 73 (Fla.1973).

As to the last point, the prosecutrix’ testimony alone (which was obviously believed by the jury) was sufficient to make out a prima facie case and, therefore, no error was made by the trial court in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal. *State v. Smith,*249 So.2d 16 (Fla.1971); *State v. Riggins,*314 So.2d 238 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1975); *Berezovsky v. State,*335 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1976).

The conviction under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Exhibit 10.12


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO


CONSULTANT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTANT
AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of October ___, 2021, by and among MAINZ BIOMED B.V. (including upon conversion to
a Naamloze Venootschap under Dutch law, the “Company”) and William Caragol (the “Consultant”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Consultant
are parties to that certain Consultant Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2021 (the “Consultant Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section
19 of the Consultant Agreement, the parties desire to amend the Consultant Agreement as provided in this Amendment; and


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the foregoing and the mutual agreements contained in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficient of which are hereby acknowledged, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1. Schedule 4.2 to the Consultant Agreement is
hereby amended and replaced in its entirety by the following:


 


“After a Stock Option Plan has been
approved by the Board of Directors and shareholders of the Company \but prior to the IPO, the Company and Consultant shall enter into
the Stock Option Agreement attached here to as Exhibit A. Consultant’s equity ownership will be reviewed within 12 months of the
IPO for increase, if applicable, to be consistent with industry standards for CFOs of similarly situated companies.”


  


2. Except as expressly amended and modified by
this Amendment, the terms, representations, warranties, covenants and other provisions of the Consultant Agreement are and shall continue
to be in full force and effect in accordance with the Consultant Agreement.


 


3. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts,
each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which shall constitute one agreement. This Amendment shall become effective upon
delivery to each party of an executed counterpart or the earlier delivery to each party of original, photocopied, or electronically transmitted
signature pages that together (but need not individually) bear the signatures of all other parties.


 


4. This Amendment is limited by its terms and
does not and shall not serve to amend or waive any provision of the Consultant Agreement except as expressly provided for in this Amendment.
All references in the Amendment to “this Consultant Agreement” or terms such as “herein”, “hereof”
or similar terms shall mean the Consultant Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Consultant Agreement.


 


5. The provisions of Section 16 (Governing Law;
Jurisdiction and Venue) of the Consultant Agreement shall apply to this Amendment as if written out below.


 


[Signature Page to follow]


 









     


     


    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have caused this Amendment to be signed, all as of the date first written above.





 


	WILLIAM CARAGOL	 	MAINZ BIOMED B.V.
		 	 
		 	 
	William Caragol	 	Name:
		 	Title:
		 	 
		 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:
256 La. 367

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ferrol BRIGNAC.

No. 50648.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1970.

In re: Ferrel Brignac applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Digagogo Ventures Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fernando Londe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Fernando Londe By: Fernando Londe Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  Dated: March 28, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MEDL Mobile Holdings,
Inc. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Murray Williams, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



|/s/ Murray Williams                                                                                             |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|Murray Williams
        Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)
        December 17, 2014 |  |  |
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Benou Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|                      |                                                   
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 21, 2011 | /s/ Robert S. Benou                               
|                      | Robert S. Benou                                   
|                      | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
|                      | Officer and Treasurer                             

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5832-5833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation      Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire 
or control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.25 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.25) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for processing, it will 
also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the 
question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 
of the BHC Act, including whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for a hearing 
on this question must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a 
written presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, 
identifying specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, 
summarizing the evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and 
indicating how the party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of 
the proposal.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than February 21, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-2171:
    1. Farmers State Financial Corp., Victor, Montana; to engage de 
novo through its subsidiary, Farmers State Bank, FSB, Stevensville, 
Montana, in operating a savings association, pursuant to Sec.  
225.25(b)(9) of the Board's Regulation Y.


[[Page 5833]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 3, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-3043 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,619
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,259
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,063,541
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,111,675
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,142,957)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,259
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,588)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,588)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Daily            Debt Subject to Limit Activity

($ millions)

11/12/2021 11/15/2021 11/16/2021 11/17/2021 

Treasury Bills Net -5,996 0 -9,999 0 

Treasury Notes Net 0 35,316 0 0 

Treasury Bonds Net 0 8,829 0 0 

Marketable Inflation Compensation 0 0 0 0 

Marketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment 305 455 152 151 

Total Marketable Activity -5,692 44,599 -9,847 151 

Airport and Airway Trust Fund 0 0 -558 0 

Civil Service Retirement and Disability Trust Fund 0 0 0 0 

Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund 32 1,254 -4 657 

Department of Defense Medicare Eligible Retiree Fund -13 178 -21 -45 

Employees' Health Benefits Fund 513 98 -61 -207 

Employees' Life Trust Fund 49 -8 -5 -21 

Exchange Stabilization Fund 0 0 -4 0 

Deposit Insurance Fund -6 632 -1 -2 

Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund 428 513 1,206 -835 

FHA, Mutual Mortgage Insurance Capital Reserve Account, HUD 0 0 0 0 

Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund 443 564 2,107 954 

Federal Old-Age And Survivors Insurance Trust Fund 2,748 3,004 7,077 -16,594 

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund -639 -77 -429 5,872 

Foreign Service Retirement And Disability Fund 0 0 0 0 

Highway Trust Fund -1,091 0 0 0 

National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund -9 92 0 0 

Deposits, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Bonus Bids, MMS 0 0 0 0 

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation -5 229 10 -4 

Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund 0 0 0 0 

Postal Service Fund -1,180 44 354 32 

Railroad Retirement Account 37 383 47 11 

Thrift Savings Fund 7,198 -49,886 -245 9,917 

Unemployment Trust Fund -17 43 -96 1 

Nonmarketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment 207 310 104 103 

Nonmarketable Inflation Compensation 0 0 0 0 

All Other Trust Funds -3,040 5 313 -11 

Total Government Account Series (Net) 5,653 -42,620 9,794 -172 

Certificates of Indebtedness 2 0 41 -4 

Discount Adjustment 0 37 2 12 

Domestic Series 0 0 0 0 

Foreign Series 0 0 0 0 

State and Local Government Series -10 -2,079 0 0 

Tax and Loss Bonds 0 0 0 0 

United States Savings Bonds 46 63 10 13 

Total Non-Marketable Activity (Net) 5,692 -44,599 9,847 -151 

Daily Public Debt Activity 0 0 0 0 

Total Public Debt Subject to Limit 28,881,438 28,881,438 28,881,438 28,881,438 

Daily Extraordinary Measures 

Investments Suspended (-)/Reinvested (+) 6,489 -49,591 -760 10,422 
DEBT SUBJECT TO LIMIT 

EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES 

($ billions) 

Date 11/17/2021 

Impacted 

Funds 

Measures 

Authorized 

Measures 

Used 

Measures 

Remaining 

CSRDF 1/ 67 (67) 0 

G Fund 280 (143) 137 

ESF 23 0 23 

Totals* 370 (210) 160 

*Differences may occur due to rounding. 

1/ Includes Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, and Postal 

Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. Assumes Debt Issuance 

Suspension Period (DISP) ends on December 3, 2021. Measures 

authorized includes the value of early redemptions, which will 

decrease by roughly $7 billion on both November 1, 2021 and 

December 1, 2021.
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Brown, Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   March 19, 2015 |                  |                                                            |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                  |                                                            |
|                        | /s/   Edward J. Brown |
|                        | Name:                 | Edward   J. Brown                                               |
|                        | Title:                | Executive   Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                             |                       |                                                                 |  |

 

----