alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Benou
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.


|                      |                                                                                          
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June
 21, 2010 | /s/ Robert
 S. Benou                                                                     
|                      |                                                                                          
|                      | Robert S.
 Benou
 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer

The foregoing certification is
being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
Silberstein Ungar, PLLCCPAs and Business Advisors


Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com





March 31, 2011








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors


DM Products, Inc.


Walnut Creek, CA





To Whom It May Concern:





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K,Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by DM Products, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2011, relating to the financial statements of DM Products, Inc. as of and for the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Bingham Farms, Michigan
#### INSTANT CREDIT SERVICE, INC. v. The SASSY CAT, INC., et al.

No. 47204.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 17, 1973.

Pack & Ratcliff, Laurel, for appellant.

Gibbes, Graves, Mullins & Bullock, Laurel, for appellees.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH, ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Jones County; J. Shannon Clark, Chancellor.

Affirmed.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2012

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/29 4/2 4/5 30.00 31.00 29.00 26.00 120.00 -4.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 4/5 4/9 4/12 30.00 31.00 29.00 96.00 -6.00

4/12 4/16 4/19 30.00 30.00 28.00 96.00 -8.00

4/19 4/23 4/26 30.00 30.00 28.00 91.00 -3.00

4/26 4/30 5/3 30.00 30.00 28.00 26.00 112.00 2.00

5/3 5/7 5/10 30.00 30.00 28.00 90.00 -2.00

5/10 5/14 5/17 30.00 30.00 28.00 90.00 -2.00

5/17 5/21 5/24 30.00 30.00 28.00 90.00 -2.00

5/24 5/29 5/31 30.00 30.00 28.00 25.00 114.00 -1.00

5/31 6/4 6/7 30.00 30.00 28.00 90.00 -2.00

6/7 6/11 6/14 28.00 29.00 28.00 90.00 -5.00

6/14 6/18 6/21 26.00 29.00 28.00 90.00 -7.00

6/21 6/25 6/28 26.00 29.00 28.00 25.00 112.00 -4.00

1237.00 1281.00 -44.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

64-DAY BILL Matures 4/19 20.00 -20.00

49-DAY BILL Matures 4/19 20.00 -20.00

CMB Funds: -40.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

3-year Note 4/5 4/10 4/16 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 4/5 4/11 4/16 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 4/5 4/12 4/16 13.00 0.00 40.57 25.43

5-year TIPS 4/12 4/19 4/30 14.00 0.00

2-year Note 4/19 4/24 4/30 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 4/19 4/25 4/30 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 4/19 4/26 4/30 29.00 0.00 57.35 55.65

3-year Note 5/2 5/8 5/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note 5/2 5/9 5/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 5/2 5/10 5/15 16.00 0.00 32.80 39.20

10-year TIPS ® 5/10 5/17 5/31 13.00 0.00

2-year Note 5/17 5/22 5/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 5/17 5/23 5/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 5/17 5/24 5/31 29.00 0.00 58.53 53.47

3-year Note 6/7 6/12 6/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 6/7 6/13 6/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Note ® 6/7 6/14 6/15 13.00 0.00 26.87 39.13

30-year TIPS ® 6/14 6/21 6/29 7.00 0.00

2-year Note 6/21 6/26 7/2 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 6/21 6/27 7/2 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 6/21 6/28 7/2 29.00 0.00 53.13 52.88

535.00 269.25 265.75

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 182
ARTMEN TO F ASPORTATIO N n ' OPERATION

S MoumrinAirServkwLL C ^EU | PX>.Baxl8 S ^ g ^ ^^'^ ' ^3 A R-5

2 Ceii:(304)ri^l « ^^„ ^ Plione : (304yi69*197 9 ySif^fT^ ^

Fix:(304>2»O0 0 Dm g Abetoimi t

Progra m?olk y Diviskm : N4ay , 16,201 1 Mountat aAi r

Service s LL C faafligiitaeivkcscoaipBny faBadthai^ ^ faaletta r daie dNovembe r

2,200 9 w e wei » grante dexemptio nfirom^ Federa l Regulation s t o allo w ou r 91.14 7 safet y sensitiv e personne l t o b e include dfa tiie testin g o f

ou r Par t 13 5 Dru g u dAlcoho l Testin g Program . I a mwritin g t o da y t o as k

fin-anextensio n o f

Eicmplio aNo . 9556 , Rapdatoi y Docke t

No . FAA-2M9-M67 , wfaid i i s cunend y du e t o expir e o n Octobe r 31,2011 . Ou r recpies t ib r extensio no f

thf aexemptio ni s base do nth e sam e premis e o f ou r origina l reques t

MountafaAi r

Service s LL C b asmal l compan y wit honl y lou r personne l fasafet y sensitiv e fimctioos. Operatin g unde r th e exemptio nha s significanti y ease dth e financial an dadministfativ e burde no f havin g t o opemt e tw o .SjBpqige program s for

th e sam e four

fadividuals. W e feel tiiat

ou r aibility t o operat e unde r on e progra mha s cause dn o ris k t o th e safet y o f

th e operatio no r

di e public , Y^iic hw e tierve . You r constderationoftfai s extensio ni s gieati y appreciated . I f yo u hav e an y question s regaidfa g tins request , o r nee dfuithe r

clarificilio npleas e contac t

ou r offic e a t di e nun^ier s liste didx>ve .

. *. ' Sinrareiy, i ,, . ,>i^ . jo u w ^...wir; / ...>.unjjs/x-ry / japanM^iw v )|ii6cU)r o f Operation s %n.

y .xiuqi/iqiujf.^ - //. ' nmon^.: ) >• > '•

• •'-rn;r.f!Oi.. x t o !«i;o

M om . ^ r m'M9i > '^oi^'Mii^r

. bc,i£fmur. \f o p c i:jc|nqc n M T/M W M t /AGL C ST.3UiG

U Cyr,» L ..{lO

U JV) »
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1256 

CAF 13-01035 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF KIMBERLY E. REINHARDT, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIE T. HARDISON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

ROBERT J. GALLAMORE, OSWEGO, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County

(Richard V. Hunt, J.), entered May 24, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant

to Family Court Act article 4. The order sentenced respondent to 60

days in the Jefferson County Jail for failure to pay child support. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order confirming

the determination of the Support Magistrate that he willfully violated

an order of child support and sentencing him to a term of 

incarceration of 60 days. We reject the father’s contention that

petitioner mother failed to meet her burden of presenting prima facie

evidence of his willful violation. “[P]roof that [the father] has

failed to pay support as ordered alone establishes [the mother’s]

direct case of willful violation, shifting to [the father] the burden

of going forward” (Matter of Powers v Powers, 86 NY2d 63, 69). 

Contrary to the father’s further contention, he failed to meet his

burden inasmuch as he failed to present competent medical evidence to

support his testimony that mental health problems interfered with his

ability to obtain gainful employment to meet his child support

obligation (see Matter of Yamonaco v Fey, 91 AD3d 1322, 1323, lv

denied 19 NY3d 803), nor did he establish that he made reasonable

efforts to obtain such employment (see Matter of Christine L.M. v

Wlodek K., 45 AD3d 1452, 1452-1453). 

The father failed to preserve for our review his contention that

the Support Magistrate improperly assisted the mother with her

testimony and was biased against him (see Matter of Gina C. v Augusto

C., 116 AD3d 478, 479, lv denied 23 NY3d 905; Matter of Sheenagh O’R.

v Sean F., 50 AD3d 480, 482-483). Finally, we reject the father’s

contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel inasmuch

as he did not “ ‘demonstrate the absence of strategic or other

legitimate explanations’ for counsel’s alleged shortcomings” (People v

Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712; see Matter of Elijah D. [Allison D.], 74 
-2- 1256 

CAF 13-01035 

AD3d 1846, 1847). 

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### Martha EDWARDS and John B. Edwards, her husband, Appellants, v. KINGS POINT HOUSING CORP., a Florida Corporation, Sykes Flooring Company, a Florida Corporation, North River Insurance Company, a corporation, and Acousti Engineering Company, Appellees. KINGS POINT HOUSING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Martha EDWARDS and John B. Edwards, her husband, Sykes Flooring Company, a Florida Corporation, North River Insurance Company, a corporation, and Acousti Engineering Company, Appellees.

Nos. 76-1418 — 76-1519.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 11, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 9, 1977.

Larry A. Klein, West Palm Beach, and Law Offices of Thomas G. Purdo, Boynton Beach, for appellants-Edwards.

Louisa H. Smith-Adam of Montgomery, Lytal, Reiter, Denney & Searcy, West Palm Beach, for appellant-Kings Point Housing Corporation.

Marjorie D. Gadarian of Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellees-Acousti Engineering Co.

PER CURIAM.

Two appeals have been consolidated. In Case No. 76-1418 the plaintiffs, Martha and John Edwards, appeal a summary final judgment against them in favor of the defendant Acousti Engineering Company. In Case No. 76-1519 the defendant Kings Point Housing Corporation appeals a summary final judgment on its crossclaim in favor of codefendant, Acousti Engineering Company. We reverse in both appeals.

*1074In Case No. 76-1418, we conclude that Acousti failed to meet its burden of showing conclusively the absence of any genuine issue of material fact. Acousti relied solely upon Mrs. Edwards’ deposition testimony, but all this shows is that Mrs. Edwards could not of her own knowledge prove that the defendant was negligent. This is not enough to negate the issue of the defendant’s negligence. *Matarese v. Leesburg Elks Club,*171 So.2d 606 (Fla.2d DCA 1965); *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); *Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*351 So.2d 29 (Fla. Supreme Court, opinion filed September 8, 1977).

In Case No. 76-1519 the summary judgment was entered on the basis of res judicata. In an earlier third party complaint by Kings Point against Acousti, involving the same issue, the trial court entered an “order granting summary judgment.” However, this was not a final ap-pealable order; it therefore could not be the basis of res judicata.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and CROSS, J., and MILLER, ROBERT P., Associate Judge, concur.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Gidwitz, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph J. Sum, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350, of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.

 

 

Date: May 17, 2011

 
|   |   | By:    | /s/   James G. Gidwitz                       |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | James   G. Gidwitz                           |
|   |   |   | Chairman   of the Board and                  |
|   |   |   | Chief   Executive Officer                    |
|   |   |   |                                         |
|   |   |   |                                         |
|   |   | By:    | /s/   Joseph J. Sum                          |
|   |   |   | Joseph   J. Sum                              |
|   |   |   | Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report on Form 10-K ofAutovative Products, Inc.;for the Year ended December 31, 2011,
I, David Funderburk, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ David Funderburk       
|David Funderburk           
|Principal Executive Officer
|April 11, 2012
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2269

KEQI WANG,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A70-647-745)

Submitted: September 13, 2006 Decided: October 11, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Long, Monterey Park, California, for Petitioner. Chuck

Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Brian E. Bentley, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Keqi Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic

of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (Board) adopting and affirming the immigration

judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In his petition for review, Wang maintains that he met

his burden of proof for his request for asylum. To obtain reversal

of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must

show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no

reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of

persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992).

We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Wang

fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
IFC INVESTMENT IN ARMAJARO TRADING

U.S. POSITION

MARCH 29, 2012 

The United States appreciates the IFC’s efforts to disclose material risks and integrity concerns 

associated with this project. The use of child and forced labor is widespread in this sector in 

Africa, and we agree that the IFC and Armajaro are taking important steps to comply with the 

IFC’s Environmental and Social standards; however, the United States would have preferred to 

see these assessments disclosed 120 days in advance of the board date since the IFC rated the 

project Category A. The United States also appreciates disclosure pertaining to individuals 

associated with Armajaro, and agrees that the potential integrity issues that were identified in the 

project document are not material and should not hinder the IFC from moving forward. The 

United States recognizes that this proposal represents an exceptional level of disclosure and 

appreciates the IFC’s willingness to confront potential risks in an open and transparent manner. 

The United States understands that operations in Africa’s cocoa sector require interaction with 

small-scale farmers, which in turn requires the deep operational knowledge that the IFC can 

bring to Armajaro’s work. The United States also appreciates that it is typical for integrated 

supply chain managers such as Armajaro to operate in a highly-leveraged environment and the 

difficulty of identifying financial partners. As such, the IFC can bring its financial and 

reputational strength to extend the project’s development impact further into remote areas of 

production. The United States wishes to highlight that the IFC’s Asset Management Company is 

considering co-investing in this project and welcomes the additional leverage it brings. 

With these comments, the United States would like to be recorded as abstaining because the 

project proposal did not meet legislative requirements on timely disclosure of environmental 

impact assessments.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Janet Gill, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Aspen Group, Inc.; and



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: August 29, 2016



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|/s/ Janet Gill                                                  
|Janet Gill
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Brenda C. Barnes, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 10, 2007



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Brenda C. Barnes,               
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32



March 24, 2022

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with the Annual Report of ECA Marcellus
Trust I (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of
the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its
knowledge:



(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.



The above certification is furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.



| | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Trustee for ECA Marcellus Trust I
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                   
| | By:                                                                               
| |                                                                                   
| |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65420-65421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-346-000]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Informal Settlement Conference

December 8, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on December 12, 1997 at 9:30 a.m., at the offices of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC, 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible 
settlement of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant, as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).


[[Page 65421]]


    For additional information, please contact Irene E. Szopo at 
(202) 208-1602 or Donald Williams at (202) 208-0743.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32504 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### James WATSON v. STATE.

No. 38361.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 218 So.2d 483.