· . , , RADIAN CORPORA"'ON

MEMORANDUM

TO: David Markwardt, EPA/CPB (MD-13)

FROM: . Daryl J. Whitt, Radian

DATE: 5 June 1991

SUBJECT: Impacts from the Control of VHAP Emissions from

Equipment Leaks in Non-SOeM! Process Units for HON

The purpose of this memorandum is to present and document

the impacts from the control of Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutant

(VHAP) emissions from equipment leaks for select process units

which are not included in the Synthetic organic Chemical

Manufacturing Industries (SOCM!) impacts for the Hazardous

organic NESHAP (HON). These impacts apply to process units using

the designated VHAPs in the seven source categories listed in

paragraph (c), section XX.XQ of the National Emission standard

for Equipment Leaks (also known as the Equipment Leaks Negotiated

RegUlation or Reg Neg). The seven source categories and

designated VHAPs are:

(1) styrene-butadiene rubber production (butadiene and

styrene);

(2) Polybutadiene production (butadiene);

(3) Chlorine production (carbon tetrachloride);

(4) Pesticide production (carbon tetrachloride, methylene

chloride, and ethylene dichloride);

(5) Chlorinated hydrocarbon use (carbon tetrachloride,

methylene chloride, tetrachloroethylene, chloroform,

and ethylene dichloride);

(6) Pharmaceutical production (carbon tetrachloride, and

methylene chloride); and

(7) Miscellaneous butadiene use (butadiene).

This memorandum presents the baseline emissions, emission

reductions, and cost impacts attributable to implementation of

the Reg Neg for these seven source categories.
The methodology used for this impacts analysis was divided

into three steps. The procedure and results of each of these

steps are discussed in greater detail below. These steps were:

• step 1. section 11~site survey response letters from

select facilities within the seven source categories

were reviewed. These response letters had been

obtained under a previous work assignment and new

information gathering was not required.

• step 2. Federal "and state regulations were reviewed to

determine if any equipment leak emission "controls

requirements are already in place for these source

categories.

• step 3. Based on information gathered during the first

two steps, control costs, baseline emissions, and

emission reductions, were estimated using the equipment

count based algorithms which were developed for

evaluation of SOCHI processes. 1,2

The impacts presented in this memorandum are based

exclusively on the responses to the Section 114 survey. The

responses included equipment counts for the facilities but may

not represent a complete accounting of all equipment in VHAP

service. Further, this is only a sub-set of the actual number of

facilities within the seven non-SOCMI industries. Impacts for

the entire industries have not been estimated because the number

of process units within each industry is unknown. It is assumed

that the process units evaluated here are representative of the

seven industries, but this cannot be determined from the

available data.

SECTION 114 SURVEY RESPONSE LETTERS

Response letters to surveys authorized under Section 114 of

the Clean Air Act were reviewed for 86 facilities believed to be

included in the seven non-SOCMI source categories. The process

units at these facilities were then checked to ensure

applicability of the Reg Neg and prevent overlap with process

jkb.076

VlIAP .1lIeIft 2
· , -,'

units included in the SOCMI impacts already evaluated under HON.

Any process units not covered by the Reg Neg or included in the

soeMI impacts were removed from this analysis. The final list of

facilities included a total of 60 process units.

The survey response for each process unit included in the

final list was reviewed to determine geographic location and

equipment counts. The information gathered from the survey

responses of the 60 process units is presented in Table 1.

The geographic location of each process unit was used to

determine if the unit is in a state which already has regulations

in place requiring equipment leak emissions controls. This was

later used to assign the costing and emissions algorithms which

use different baseline emission factors for process units in

states with control regulations and in states without control

regulations.

The baseline emission factors used for units in states

without equipment leak regulations are the Ituncontrolledll factors

presented in Table 2, while the factors used for units in states

with equipment leak regulations are the llCTG controlledl

' emission

factors. 2 The "CTG controlled" emission factors are used to

estimate equipment leaks emissions from equipment controlled to

the level specified in the SOCMI CTG for Equipment Leaks. 3

Table 2 also presents the MACT controlled emission factors, which

are used to estimate equipment leak emissions after Reg Neg

controls are in place. The emission reductions are then

estimated as the difference between baseline emissions and Reg

Neg controlled emissions.

The equipment counts for each process unit were used in the

algorithms developed for the SOCMI impacts analysis. These

algorithms are used to estimate baseline emissions, emission

reductions, and cost impacts for each process unit as a function

of the equipment counts contained in the section 114 responses.

Some of the information contained in the section 114 survey

response letters required clarification. First, the surveys ,

listed pumps as having packed seals, mechanical seals, or double

mechanical seals. Pumps with double mechanical seals are exempt

jltb.076

VHAP.1IlellI 3
TABLE 1. NON-SOCMI PROCESS UNIT LOCATIONS AND EQUIPMENT COUNTS

Section

114

File

No.

Facil ity

Name location

PUIlJ Seals (a)

•••••• -----•••• Compressor

LL HL Seals

SlIq)le Open

Valves (a) Pressure Connections Ended lines

--•••••••-----••••••••• Relief ••••••••----•••••••••••••-••

Flanges Gas LL Nl Devices Gas liq Gas liq

STYRENE'BUTADIENE RUBBER PRODUCTION

====:========================:c;==========c=============c======_==e:=================:==:_==::::===::==:============:::=:::::=:======:==========:===========:

EQ051 American Synthetic Rubber Corp. louisville KY 10 2 450 3 120 10 40

EQ054 BF Goodrich Co. Port Neches TX 10 30 6837 732 740

EQ056 Copolymer Rubber & Chemical Baton Rouge LA 28 2661 30 1225 11 73

EQ065 BASF (formerly Polysar) Chattanooga TN 17 1 950 131 128 16 2 1 18

EQ065 BASF (formerly Polysar) Chattanooga TN 14 7 1343 87 162 35 6 36 2 163

EQ075 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Houston TX 35 15 1600 100 2100 1 5 20 5

EQ076 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Calhoun GA 7 3 350 142 164 30 12 2 10

EQ084 Gencorp, Inc. Odessa TX 20 4 2409 221 697 19 16 16 63 83

EQ085 Gencorp, Inc. Mogadore OH 7 1 650 12 130 32 2 20 8

oC>o EQ086 \I.R. Grace &Co. Owensboro KY 5 1 105 14 36 16 7 16 5

.....--_ --------- -------- _-------- _-----_ -.---_ _------ ---- _-----_ _---- -- _--_ _---- ---

POLYBUTADIENE PRODUCTION

====================================================== ====;=========;========================~=======c=c=====================aa=c==a==c================a~==ac

EQ051 American Synthetic Rubber Corp. Louisville ICY 34 6 2250 545 55 70

EQ052 ARCO Chemical Co. ChaMel View TX 31 150 300 4 28 60

EQD66 Phillips Petroleum Co. Borger TX 18 91 173 34

EQ067 Polysar Limited Orange TX 34 5 3200 50 . 502 58

EQ071 Union Carbide Corp. Institute W 0 80 30 15 2

EQ073 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Beaunont TX 18 4 708 239 103 15 30

EQ073 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Beaunont TX 23 2 892 417 71 26

EQ082 Firestone Orange TX 42 2 2376 398 2517 8 26 68 708

EQ083 firestone lake Charles LA 14 1 46 248 3

••........... __ _..-- _--------_.- - _._ .••••....••...••.. _ _....••.••••...........••_.- _---- __ .._------ _-

(a) Pump seals and valves are divided Into equipment in light liquid service (LL)

and heavy liquid service (Nl) where data are available.

,

L
(

TABLE 1.

(

(Continued)

(

Section

114

File

No.

Facil ity

Name Location

PUlp Seals (0)

II Hl

COII'pressor

Seals

SBq)le Open

Valves (a) Pressure Connections Ended lines

••••..••••.•••••••••••• Relief ••••••.•••.••••••••••••••••.

Flanges Gas II Hl Devices Gas liq Gas liq

CHLORINE PRODUCTION

====;=:=================================================c=======:=====:=====::=:::==:=====:=:=:====::=:=========_:;==============_:::::===:===::==:=:===:=:::

EQ033 DI amend Shamrock Deer Park TX 2 140 34

EQ033 Diamond Shamrock BattlegrOUld TX 0 5 402 80 222 13 48

EQ033 Diamond Shamrock Mobil AL 3 42 37

EQ033 Diamond Shamrock Muscle Shoals AL 3 140 51 2 16 18

EQ033 Diamond Shamrock Delaware City DE 5 356 83 19

EQ038 Du Pont Corpus Christi TX 0 29 8

PESTICIDE PRODUCTION

=============:m=============c==========================e===::::::::====::::=:==::===:::::::=:::::=::=:=====::==========:=====================================

01 EaOD1 Buckman laboratories, Inc. Cadet MO 4 48 14 9 4

EQD01 Buckman laboratories, Inc. Meqlhis TN 16 0 124 42 46 0 0 13 1 0

EQ002 Chevron Chemical Corp. Richmond CA 29 264 296 735 18 2 26 25 110

Ea002 Chevron Chemical Corp. Maryland Heights MO 1 2 2

Ea003 DuPont La Porte TX 13 2 1043 92 167 11 10 38 46

EQ004 FHC Corp. Baltimore HO 0 445 112 12 6 14

Ea005 Hobey Chemical Corp. Kansas City HO 6 46 6

Ea007 Monsanto Agricultural Prod. Amiston Al 5 6 200 20 80 8 4 2 2

EQ008 Union Carbide Agrig. Prod. Co. Institute W 8 678 590 5

EQ008 Union Carbide Agria. Prod. Co. Institute W 7 1128 623 17

Ea009 Union Carbide Agrig. Prod. Co. \loodblne GA 20 S 9

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON USE

=================0================================:;:: :::=====:==::=:==:::======c======c=~================== =================================================

EQOOS Hobey Chemical Corp.

EQ035 General Electric Co.

Baytown

MO\.nt Vernon

TX

IN

48

94

1750 75

4 11053 212

811

1700

2

71 27

40

125 15

188

43

.......-_ ..----------.----.._----- _.----------_.-------------- _---.. _--_ _--- - _--.--_ _- --_ _.--- -.--- (a) Pump seals and valves are divided Into equipment in light liquid service (ll)

and heavy liquid service (HL) where data are available.
TABLE 1. (Continued)

Section

114

File

No.

Facil ity

Name Location

PUlP Seals (a)

.•••••.•••••••. Compressor

LL HL Seals

SIIII'p le Open

Valves (a) Pressure connections Ended Lines

••....•••••.•.....•..•• Relief ••••••....••••••••••••••••••

flanges Gas LL HL Devices Gas liq Gas liq

PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION

:====================================;=======================================================================================================================

EQ011 :The UpJOOn Co. Kalamazoo MI 185 2550 2275 240 270 760

EQ012 The UpJOOn Co. Barceloneta PR 7 450 7 53 ·15 7 15

EQ013 Eli Lilly & Co. lafayette IN 54 4500

EQ013 Eli Li lly & Co. Cl inton IN 31

EQ014 Eli Lilly & Co. Indianepol is IN 2 4 38 4

EQ015 Abbott Laboratories Abbott Park IL 1 12 6 12 3 3

EQ016 Abbott Laboratories CNC 0 8 50 8 8 3

EQ017 Abbott Laboratories PPR ,. 10 5 3 3

EQ018 Abbott Laboratories North Chicago IL 13 165 34 26 9 1 4

EQ019 Abbott Laboratories CNC 11 50 24 6 9 3 6 5 2

0\ EQ020 Abbott Laboratories CPR 3 76 49 7 4

EQ021 Merck Chemical Co. Barceloneta PR 56 500 3 40 4 5 6

EQ022 Merck Chemical Co. Rahway NJ 39 698 114 266 43 42 3 4

EQ023 Merck Chemical Co. Danville PA 47 2200 396 44 44 44

EQ024 Merck Chemical Co. Albany GA 27 2165 193 348 31 48

..........._------.---- -_._-------.- __ ---------- _------------ ------- _---------- _------_ _------- _----- --- .

MISCELLANEOUS BUTADIENE USE

================~===================================== ==================================================================;:====================::=============

EQ066 Phillips Petroleun Co. Borger TX 3 95 38 68 1 3 4 7

EQ066 Phillips Petroleun Co. Borger TX 0 2 10 3

EQ068 Room and HaaS Kentucky Louisville ICY 4 1 143 10 45 8 4

EQ069 SOOio Lilll8 OH 1 1 6 4 2 3 4 9

EQ070 Uniroyal Painesville OH 11 7 490 40 196 16 12 24 21

EQOn Monsanto Polymer Prod. Muscatine IA 3 1 136 19 69 1 0 5 2 9

EQ074 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Akron OH 1 3 992 190 304

••..........._- -.--- _---------_.---- _-- --------- _-_ _----- -----.- _------- ----._--.-._---

(a) Pump seals and valves are divided into equipment in light liq~id service (lL)

and heavy liquid service (HL) where data are available.
TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF EQUIPMENT LEAK VOC EMISSION FACTORS

jkb.D76

VHAP.llIeIlI 7
from the Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) requirements of the Reg

Neg, provided they are equipped with a heavy liquid barrier fluid

system wh~ch is operated at a pressure above the stuffing box

pressure or are controlled with a closed-vent or closed-purge

system. To be exempt from the routine leak detection and repair

requirements for pump seals, the barrier fluid system must also

have a sensor to detect seal failure. It was assumed that pumps

in existing process units would not meet all of these exemption

requirements and, therefore, were included in this analysis.

Second, whether the pumped fluid was heavy liquid or light

liquid was not stated. To be used in this analysis, a

determination of heavy liquid or light liquid service would be

required. Pump seals in heavy liquid and light liquid service

use different emission factors and are controlled differently by

the Reg Neg. Therefore, the designated VHAPs of concern for each

source category were evaluated. All of the VHAPs (butadiene,

styrene, carbon tetrachloride, methylene chloride, ethylene

dichloride, tetrachloroethylene, and chloroform) are light

liquids. Therefore, all pumps were assumed to be in light liquid

service and the total number of pumps was used. Further, this

represents the worst case high cost for the process units.

Third, the section 114 survey responses listed separate

equipment counts for equipment in gas service and in liquid

service for sample connections and open-ended lines. The

equipment counts for each of these equipment types were summed

for this analysis since the Reg Neg requires identical controls

for all equipment of these types, regardless of service.

EXISTING REGULATIONS

Federal and state regulations for six states were reviewed

)

to determine which process units are located in areas with

applicable equipment leak control regUlations. This information

was used to determine which baseline emission factors and

algorithms should be applied to each process unit. Process units

in areas without regUlations ,were evaluated using the

jkb.076

VHAP.mem 8
"uncontrolled" emission factors and algorithms which estimate

impacts based on a process unit with no regulatory-driven program

in place for reducing emissions from equipment leaks. Process

units in areas with regulations were evaluated using the "CTG

controlled" emission factors and algorithms which estimate

impacts based on a process unit with controls meeting the

guidance contained in the SOCHl CTG.

Federal Regulations

The review of federal regulations revealed that equipment

leak emissions from equipment in VHAP service for these seven

source categories are not currently regulated by the federal

government. Therefore, the impacts for each process unit were

estimated based on state equipment leaks control regulations.

Existing process units in states which adopt federal NSPS

requirements were assumed to have no applicable regulations and

were evaluated using the "uncontrolled" baseline emission factors

and algorithms which estimate impacts based on a process unit

with no existing controls.

state Regulations

Regulations for six states (Illinois, Louisiana, New Jersey,

Ohio, Texas, and West Virginia) which had been initially reviewed

for all of HON were rechecked for this analysis. Based on the

equipment leak regulations found in these six states, assumptions

were made to extend the analysis to cover the seven source

categories in alISO states. Regulations for alISO states were

not reviewed. Originally these six states were chosen for the

review because 61 percent of the SOeMI facilities are located

••. 4 w1th1n these states.

The assumptions made to extrapolate this data are discussed

in greater detail below. A summary of the final determination of

regulatory status for each source category in each state is

presented in Table J.

jkb.076

VHAP..... 9
by-step for the SOCKI equipment leaks cost impacts and are

discussed in more detail in the April 15, 1991 memorandum from

Daryl Whitt to David Markwordt'. The algorithms were compressed

into two series of eight equations for this analysis. The

results of these equations are:

• Equation 1. Capital Costs;

• Equation 2. Annualized Capital Costs;

• Equation 3. Annualized Operating Costs;

• Equation 4. Total Annualized Costs;

• Equation 5. Baseline Emissions (Mg Voc/yr);

• Equation 6. Emissions Reduction (Mg Voc/yr);

• Equation 7. Net Annual Cost; and,

• Equation 8. Cost Effectiveness ($/Mg HAP).

One series of these equations was developed based on the

"uncontrolled" baseline emission factors and the purchase of

control equipment to meet the requirements of the Reg Neg. The

second series of these equations was developed based on the "CTG

controlled" baseline emission factors and the purchase of control

equipment to improve a process unit from meeting the recommended

control levels of the SOCMI CTG for Equipment Leaks to meeting

the requirements of the Reg Neg. The procedure used to develop

these equations is discussed in Attachment 1.

It should be noted that these equations have been developed

based on the same costs, monitoring frequencies, leak

frequencies, and other assumptions used for the SOCMI impacts

analysis. However, the results of this analysis are based on the

equipment counts reported for specific process units and not

model units. Therefore, the results for anyone process unit in

this analysis may vary greatly from the results of anyone model

unit in the SOCMI analysis, but the average of the results for a

source category in this analysis should be similar to the results

of using the SOCMI model units.

jkb.076

VHAP.1lIeIIl 14
TABLE 3. (Continued)

Equipment Leaks Unlssions Control Regulations for Existing Units in Place?

State

StyreneButadiene

Rubber

Production

PolyButadiene

Production

Chlorine Pesticide

Production Production

Chlorinated

Hydrocarbon

Use

PharmaceutIcaI

Production

Miscellaneous

Butadiene

Use

South Dakota No No No No No No No

Tennessee No No No No No No No

Texas Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Utah No No No No No No No

Vermont No No No No No No No

Virginia No No No No No No No

Washington No No No No No No No

West Virginia No No No No No No No

Wisconsin No No No No No No No

Wyoming No No No No No No No

(1) In Kentucky, regulations apply only in Boone, Boyd, Campbell, Jefferson, and Kenton counties.

(2) In Michigan, regulations apply only in Kent, Lapeer, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Muskegon,

Oakland, Ottowa, St. Clair, Washnetaw, and Wayne counties.

(3) In Missouri. regulations apply only in Jefferson. St. Charles, Franklin. and St. Louis counties

and in the city of St.Louis.

11
TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF REGULATORY STATUS ASSUMED FOR EQUIPMENT LEAKS ..; NON-SOCMI SOURCE CATEGORIES ..

EMISSIONS CONTROLS FOR

Equipment Leaks Emissions Control Regulations for Existing Units in Place?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

StyreneButadiene Poly· Chlorinated Miscellaneous

Rubber Butadiene Chlorine Pesticide Hydrocarbon Pha rmaceutIca1 Butadiene

State Production Production Production Production Use Production Use

======Gaaaa=aa=========~ccc=a===========ca8eaa==~z==~c=ee====aaaa============~=======a===cDceee==========

Alabama No No No No No No No

Alaska No No No No No No No

Arizona No No No No No No No

Arkansas No No No No No No No

California No No No No No No No

Colorado No No No No No No No

Connecticut No No No No No No No

Delaware Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Florida No No No No No No No

Georgia No No No No No No No

Hawai i No No No No No No No

Idaho No No No No No No No

111 inois Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Indiana No No No No No No No

Iowa No No No No No No No

Kansas No No No No No No No -J

Kentucky (1) Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Louisiana Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Maine No No No No No No No

Maryland No No No No No No No

Massachusetts Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Michigan (2) Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Minnesota No No No No No No No

Mississippi No No No No No No No

Missouri (3) Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Montana No No No No No No No

Nebraska No No No No No No No

Nevada No No No No No No No

New Hampshire No No No No No No No

New Jersey Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

New Mexico No No No No No No No

New York No No No No No No No

North Carolina Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

North Dakota No No No No No No No

Ohio Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Oklahoma No No No No No No No

Oregon No No No No No No No

Pennsylvania Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

Rhode Island No No No No No No No

South Carolina No No No No No No No

10
Chlorine, Pesticide, and Pharmaceutical Production units.

The review of regulations for the six states listed above

indicated that there are currently no regulations controlling

VHAP emissions from equipment leaks for chlorine production

units, pesticide production units, and pharmaceutical production

units. Therefore it was assumed that equipment leaks emissions

for these industries are not controlled by regulations in any

state. For this analysis, all process units in these three

source categories were evaluated using the "uncontrolled"

baseline emission factors and algorithms which es~imate impacts

based on a process unit with no existing controls.

styrene-Butadiene Rubber Production, Polybutadiene Production,

Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Use, and Miscellaneous Butadiene Use.

The remaining four source categories, styrene-butadiene rubber

production, polybutadiene rubber production, chlorinated

hydrocarbon use, and miscellaneous butadiene use are all

considered to be polymer production units for this analysis.

This assumption was made since all of ~hese categories

primarily produce polymers according to the ~efinitions in the

Reg Neg. The chlorinated hydrocarbon use and miscellaneous

butadiene use categories are not exclusively polymer production

processes. However, all of the compounds covered by these

categories are polymers, polymer additives, monomers, or, in the

case of chlorinated hydrocarbon use, pesticides (which are

covered above). Further, the only two process units listed under

chlorinated hydrocarbon use for this analysis are polycarbonate

production units.

In all six of the states reviewed, polymer production units

had the same regulatory requirements as SOeMI process units.

Illinois, Louisiana, New Jersey, Ohio, and Texas require VHAP

equipment leak emissions from both SOeMI and polymer production

units to be controlled. West Virginia regulations adopt the

federal NSPS requirements and, therefore, do not require controls

for existing SOeMI units or existing polymer production units.

Based on these findings, styrene-butadiene rubber production,

polybutadiene rubber production, chlorinated hydrocarbon use, and

jkb.076

VHAP.lIIelll 12
miscellaneous butadiene use process units in Illinois, Louisiana,

New Jersey, Ohio, and Texas were evaluated using "CTG controlled"

baseline emission factors and algorithms which estimate impacts

based on a process unit with controls meeting the SOCMI CTG

recommendations. Process units in West Virginia were evaluated

using the "uncontrolled" baseline emission factors and algorithms

which estimate impacts based on a process unit with no existing

controls.

It was assumed that polymer processing units were controlled

to the CTG level in all states which had been assumed to be

controlled to the CTG level for SOCMI units. Therefore, styrenebutadiene rubber production, po1ybutadiene rubber production,

chlorinated hydrocarbon use, and miscellaneous butadiene use

process units in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Delaware,

Massachusetts, and Missouri were also evaluated using "CTG

controlled" baseline emission factors algorithms which estimate

impacts based on a process unit with controls meeting the SOCMI

CTG recommendations. Process units in all other states were

evaluated using the "uncontrolled" baseline emission factors and

algorithms which estimate impacts based on a process unit with no

existing controls.

The designation of these states is based on the July 13,

1990 memorandum from Lee Gabele to Fred Crane, Bennett King, and

Ed Moretti regarding HON Equipment Leaks-States with CTG Level of

Control for Existing sources. 5 For those states which specify

counties as being controlled, it was assumed that other counties

did not have regulatory controls. The county location of process

units in the seven source categories in the affected states were

then checked to determine if regulations applied.

CONTROL COSTS AND EMISSION REDUCTIONS

The control costs and emissions reductions were estimated as

a function of unit equipment counts using algorithms developed

for monthly valve monitoring for the SOCMI equipment leaks .~

impacts analysis under HON. The algorithms were developed stepjkb.076

VHAP.menI 13
RESULT AND CONCLUSIONS

For each of the 60 process units included in the seven nonSOCMI source categories the capital cost, annual costs, baseline

emissions, emission reductions, net annual costs, and cost

effectiveness were estimated using the equations. These results

are presented in Table 4.

The average costs, emissions, and emission reductions were

calculated for each source category. The costs, emissions, and

emission reductions were then summed for each source category.

The average cost effectiveness for each source category was

calculated based on these source category sums. The average

values for each source category are presented in Table 5. The

costs, emissions, and emission reductions for the 6 SOCHI model

units are also presented in Table 5 for comparison.

As can be seen in Table 5, the results of the impacts

analysis for non-SOCMI source categories are similar to the

results of the impacts analysis for SOCMI process units. The

average capital costs range from $25,800 for the chlorine

production source category to $201,000 for the chlorinated

hydrocarbon use source category. The average net annual costs

range from a savings of $52,900/yr for the chlorinated

hydrocarbon use source category to a cost of $8,500/yr for the

polybutadiene production source category.

The average cost effectiveness values range from a savings

of $430/Mg HAP for the chlorinated hydrocarbon use source

category to an expense of $430/Mg HAP for the miscellaneous

butadiene use source category. In all cases, the average capital

costs, average net annual costs, and the average cost

effectiveness for the non-SOCMI source categories falls within

the range of the 80CMI model units.

Some differences can be noted between the seven non-SOCHI

source categories and the SOCMI model units in Table 5. For the

chlorine production, pesticide production, and miscellaneous

butadiene use source categories the average annual operating

costs and average total annual costs are below the lowest value

jkb.076

VHAP.Mem 15
TABLE 4. IMPACTS FOR NoN-soeMI EQUIPMENT LEAKS CONTROLS

Amual ized Annual ized Total Net

Section Capitol Capital Operating Amual Basel ine Emissions Annual Cost

114 Facility CTG Cost Cost Cost Cost Emissions Reduction Cost Effectiveness

FHe No. Name location Control (S) (S/yr) (S/yr) (S/yr) (Ng VOC/yr)(Mg VOC/yr) (S/yr) ($'"9 HAP)

•.•....--_ _------ -------- _-- _----- -----_.------ _- ..•••••••.........---- .

STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER PRODUCTION

============;=============a=======c=================== =========================:c===================~~=================;~============c=============================

EQOS1 . American Synthetic Rubber Corp. louisvil te KY Y 16571 2701 20680 23380 14.45 11.74 4,700 510

EQOS4 OF Goodrich Co. Port Neches TX Y 18n74 30526 109589 140110 131.58 99.43 (18,000) (230)

EQ056 Copolymer Rubber &Chemical Baton Rouge LA y 4495 733 87117 87850 n.36 55.98 (1,200) (30)

EQ06S BASf (formerly Polysar) Chattanooga TN N 78367 15074 37920 52990 40.65 36.27 (4,700) (170)

EQ065 BASF (formerly Polysar) Chattanooga TN N 221674 39188 49213 88400 71.04 64.21 (13,700) (270)

EQ075 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Houston TX Y 10n82 17601 137183 154780 120.98 99.16 (2,900) (40)

EQ076 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Calhoun GA N 149243 26465 36621 63090 48.62 45.64 (9,500) (270)

EQ084 Gencorp, Inc. Odessa TX y 112711 18988 76642 95630 70.87 57.73 3,800 80

EQ085 Gencorp, Inc. Mogadore OH y 140984 24018 30654 54670 32.06 28.91 8,700 390

t---a EQ086 W.R. Grace &Co. Owensboro KY N 80614 14351 17578 31930 18.57 17.70 3,800 280

0\ --------------..................._------.--............_--------------.. ......_-----..... _..._------........._-----........... _-------_.......---------.._--_ .. _--

POLYBUTAOIENE PRODUCTION

================~=======~_;================c=~=c=;;;_;==;~============~=~============_=================;na=============================c============;=====:======~=

EQOS1 American Synthetic Rubber Corp. louisvi lle KY Y 59928 9768 66427 76200 60.62 . 48.44 (800) (20)

EQ052 ARCO Chemical Co. Channel View TX Y 1634 266 48580 488S0 22.69 19.97 17,100 11 100

EQ066 Phillips Petroleum Co. Borger TX Y 133612 22881 41791 64670 30.22 28.65 19,100 850

EQ067 Polys8r Limited Orange TX y 54912 8951 68358 ro10 65.88 51.25 (4,200) (110)

Ea071 Union Carbide Corp. Institute W y 59763 10228 11426 21650 9.55 9.11 7,200 1.010

EQ073 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Beaunont TX y 83916 14165 42788 56950 31.19 26.98 14,100 670

EQ073 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Beaunont TX y 12485 2035 44509 46540 30.48 24.27 8,000 420

EQ082 Firestone Orange TX y 26378 4300 174118 178420 131.75 107.05 8,200 100

EQ083 firestone lake Charles LA Y 7468 1217 26647 27860 14.80 12.61 7,800 790 ... _--_._---_ ....•..•.•-........ _-------.....•.•..•••...-_._---_ ........... _--_ ..........._---.........._-.-........ _----~ .........._...-._-...---...._--.. _- .. _--~

L
(

TABLE 4. (continued)

(

Section

114

Fi Ie No.

Facil i ty

Neme Location

CTG

Control

Capital

Cost

(S)

AMUal hed AlYlUal ized

Capital Operating

Cost Cost

(S/yr) (S/yr)

Total

Annual

Cost

(S/yr)

Net

Baseline Emissions Annual

Emissions Reduction Cost

(Mg VOC/yr)(Mg VOC/yr) (S/yr)

Cost

Effectiveness

(S/Mg HAP)

CHLORINE PRODUCTION

==============================cc=============;;;========:c====c==========~;=:=====:=============;;;====:=======~==================a==;;==:===============c=====;cc;

Ea033 Diomond Shamrock Deer Park TX N 6500 1670 7927 9600 4.03 3.33 4,300 1,660

Ea033 Diamond Shamrock BattlegrOlrd TX N 108821 19139 27373 46510 45.03 41.35 (19,200) (600)

Ea033 DiBmond Shamrock Mobil AL N 6500 1640 8561 10200 3.94 3.50 4,600 1,680

EQ033 Diamond Shamrock Muscle Shoals AL N 18225 3690 10480 14170 6.83 6.04 4,600 980

EQ033 Oiamond Shamrock Delaware City DE N 8432 2250 13117 15370 9.90 8.23 2,300 360

EQ038 Du Pont CorFKJS Christ I TX N 6500 1520 4953 6470 0.70 0.53 5,600 13,660

PESTICIDE PRODUCTION

=D==a==acc=c========~==================:==:========cc======c========;;========:====ccc========~=====~=~ccc=====~==========B===========m===~========================

..... EaOOl Buckman I aboratorf es, Inc. Cadet MO N 8134 1930 8942 10810 3.85 3.59 5,200 1,860 ...... Ea001 Bucklflan laboratories, Inc. Meqlhis TN N 11914 3002 21685 24690 14.45 13...0 3,400 330

EQ002 Chevron Chemical Corp. Richmond CA N 102401 19710 79398 99110 89.35 82.96 (32,800) (510)

EQ002 Chevron Chemical Corp. Maryland Heights MO N 6500 1527 5421 6950 0.61 0.61 6,000 lZ,540

EQ003 DuPont La Porte TX N 74838 14270 34686 48960 40.12 35.13 (6,900) (250)

EQ004 fMC Corp. Baltimore tI) N 57532 10581 15057 25640 18.31 16.29 (300) (20)

EQOO5 Mobay Chemical Corp. Kansas City KO N 6500 1700 9674 11370 3.33 2.96 6,600 2.840

EOO07 Monsanto Agricultural Prod. Amiston AL N n434 13680 19600 33280 26.98 24.62 (5,900) (310)

EQ008 Union Carbide Agrig. Prod. Co. Institute W N 26149 6045 38898 44940 48.18 42.22 (22,200) (670)

EaOO8 Union Carbide Agrig. Prod. Co. Institute W N 73306 14403 45037 59440 60.36 52.91 (24,700) (600)

EOO09 Union Carbide Agrig. Prod. Co. Woodbine GA N 41.390 7753 23529 31280 19.80 18.40 2,000 140

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON USE

c=ua~==~==a=====a==:==============a=c==============================;================~c===========;=;=======c=====c============~=========;=;=================c======

EQOOS

EQ035

Hobey Chemical Corp.

General Electric Co.

Baytown

MOUOlt Vernon

TX

IN

• y

N

24204

378487

4010

75798

87987

223225

92000

299020

62.63

308.44

51.16 10,700

261.31 (116.500)

270

(570)
TABLE 4. (continued)

Section

114

FHe No.

Facility

Name location

CTC

Control

Capital

Cost

(S)

Amua l i zed Annual t zed

Capital Operating

Cost Cost

(S/yr) (S/yr)

Total

Anroal

Cost

(S/yr)

Net

Baseline Emissions Annual

Emissions Reduction Cost

(Mg VOC/yr)(Mg VOClyr) (S/yr)

Cost

Effectiveness

(S/Mg HAP)

......-.....•.•..•.••.•.....-.......•••••••••••........ __ ._---- _-_ _-- __ - _----- _- _--------_ _---..

PHARMAceUTICAL PRODUCTION

===============================;============================c~=================;====:=========a============================::c===a========:cc;=============c=======

EQ011 The UpJOOn Co. lCalamazoo HI N 1137226 202515 354560 557080 421.97 395.95 (72.500) (230)

E0012 The UpJohn Co. Barceloneta PR N 69831 12841 19594 32440 19.97 18.13 3.600 250

E0013 Eli Lilly & Co. Lafayette IN N 6500 5847 60287 66130 56.06 41.26 500 20

EQ013 El i Li lly & Co. Cl i"ton IN N 6500 2380 29106 31490 13.40 12.70 11.300 1,140

EOO14 Eli Lilly & Co. Irdianapol is IN N 8134 1855 7848 9700 3.n 3.50 4.100 1.500

EOO15 Abbott Laboratories Abbott Park IL N 55188 9862 10029 19890 8.58 8.50 6.400 970

EOO16 Abbott Laboratories CNC N 39164 7149 9912 17060 8.32 8.23 4,000 620

EOO17 Abbott laboratories PPR N 8031 1784 5705 1490 1.23 1.14 5,700 6,420

.... EOO18 Abbott Laboratories North Chicago IL N 43911 8422 21179 29600 16.29 15.33 5,200 430

OJ EOO19 Abbott Laboratories eNC N 46257 8646 18239 26880 13.32 12.88 6,400 640

EQ020 Abbott laboratories CPR N 35643 6650 11795 18450 9.n 9.11 4.000 560

EQ021 Merck Chemi cal Co. Barcelonete PR N 24872 6570 53791 60360 33.64 30.66 11.600 490

E0022 Merck Chemical Co. Rahway NJ N 193352 35268 70033 105300 75.86 71.13 (7.800) (140)

E0023 Merck Chemical Co. Danville PA N 201861 37839 82123 119960 93.56 83.40 (12.600) (190)

Eo024 Merck Chemical Co. Albany GA N 147936 28214 67252 95410 83.75 74.20 (22,500) (390)

...........................---._-..................._----........••••••------....•••••... _--_ ....••••••... _------_.............._--........_---....._--............

MISCELLANEOUS BUTADIENE USE

===============================;=========================:========:==========:=====:===::==:;==~=========c=============================c===================:;==:~=a

EQ066 Phillips Petroleum Co. Borger TX y 11807 1957 12nO 14680 7.01 5.96 5,200 1,120

EO066 Phillips Petroleum Co. Borger TX y 11789 2019 6103 8120 1.93 1.84 5,200 3,620

EQ068 Room and Haas Kentucky Louisville ICY y 39315 6668 13946 20610 9.90 8.85 6,500 940

E0069 Sohfo Lima OK y 23344 3902 n06 11610 5.08 4.82 3.900 1.040

£0070 Un; royal Painesville OK Y 121283 20288 35534 S5820 36.62 32.24 4,600 180

E0072 Monsanto Polymer Prod. Huscatint: IA N 19834 3956 12134 16090 10.n 9.64 800 110

E0074 Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. Akron OH Y 18727 3053 30207 33260 25.49 19.80 1,800 120

.......•.....•......--_ ....•••••......•••.......•••.•.----_ ..-...••.•...... _...••.......•••••..-................. __ ._--...............••••••._---..._---._-....-...

L-,-. L
(

TABLE 5. NON-SOCMI SOURCE CATEGORY AVERAGE IMPACTS AND

COMPARISON TO SOCMI MODEL UNITS

(

Amual ized Amual ized Total Net

Capital Capital Operating Amual Basel ine Emissions AMual Cost

Source Cost Cost Cost Cost Emissions Reduction Cost Effectiveness

Category (S) (S/yr) (S/yr) (S/yr) (Hg VOC/yr)(Hg VOC/yr) (S/yr) (S/Hg HAP)

....----_....--...----...._---..... _---...-----_............. _--......- ........---.......---......----.........---........-.

STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER PRODUCTION 109,971 18,964 60,320 79,283 62.12 51.68 (2,900) (10)

POLYBUTADIENE PRODUCTION 48;900 8,201 58,294 66,494 44.13 36.48 8,500 300

CHLORINE PRODUCTION 25,830 4,985 12,069 17,053 11.74 10.50 367 40

.... PESTICIDE PRODUCTION 44,191 8,600 27,448 36,048 29.58 26.65 (6,321) (300)

\D CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON USE 201,345 39,904 155,606 195,510 185.54 156.23 (52,900) (430)

PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION 134,960 25,056 54,764 79,820 57.30 52.41 (3,501) (90)

MISCELLANEOUS BUTADIENE USE 35,157 5,9n 16,907 22,884 13.83 11.88 4,000 430

Model A 20983 5238 38650 43890 41.52 36.53 (14,200) (500)

Model B 224459 42830 129211 172040 167.40 149.18 (65,200) (560)

Hodel C 441517 844n 247870 332350 354.52 306.16 <154,400) (650)

Hodel D 11128 1819 38650 40530 26.37 21.37 6,500 390

Model E 203625 34650 129211 163860 110.81 92.59 16,600 230

Hodel F 391913 66346 247870 314220 236.34 187.99 15,300 100

--_ ......-...._--......-...----.-......-........ _---....---...._- ... _---...._-----........_---....--........------..........
for the SOCKI model units. The average baseline emissions and

emission reductions for chlorine production and miscellaneous

butadiene use source categories are also below the lowest value

for the SOCKI model units.

These low values are a result of lower equipment counts in

the non-SOCKI source categories for those components requiring

LOAR in the Reg Neg, and generally lower equipment counts

overall. This indicates that these source categories will be

impacted less .than the SOCKI units by implementation of the Reg

Neg. None of the average source category value exceeded the

highest SOCKI model unit value indicating that none of these

source categories will be excessively burdened by implementation

of the Reg Neg.

jkb.076

VHAP.Mem 20
· "

ATTACHMENT·!
SHEETS

·RADIAN CALCULATION SHEET

CO.•PO.~ CAlC.NO.__

.. :~:,::·~U~~ {{t#f J:::C:E_D_~ DA_TE~~ -_-

~UBJECT SHEET / OF /6"

.1!Jir" dttdcAmel1fjJlt:f~nt~ {Ae: /r//c~dl/"tZ I/fcd rd

S/~/;7 tIJe ,;zfd//jIJ/1j5 W'IC~ Were de.YC~ -/i;, t!l~.•

"SiJcl1I loyJciJ d/!t7Yf/:;" /I/1tlCI" 111111, rA-e et(vat;,/.lf"-

".. dt://va: J;c;;~ ~rc I/Jc,;i ttl ~;f;;"afc: imjJictJ 6/ --~~-~. .

IJIJI1 - 5(){jV/J jJ/t/cCJJ"" 11/1/&,

..

co ""

.. . __ .• __._ • " __" • __ _ CI?

........------------ ----1",
OF Iff

CALCULATION SHEET .

SUBJECT SHEET ,2

. COR'"

RADIAN

0 R AT ION CALC.NO. _

SIG~ATUR~~ ~AT~ 7~6:/t'I CHECKED 6;,. DATE ?/"J-,l1jQ/

PROJECT.-i::!t2!L.__.-q¥-;--.H~C~~; 'w...kfl......-..:...zM.:..u..)c:.:..., .. --"5:.:.:.:),~k.L.:..t~Ut:.[:-- __JOB NO. _

SHEETS"';

[0/)/Ii/ Cc) fs

rk= U/IT;;/ C05fs ~pr ClJJ1-/:t:f'//:~J. 2/J! 1/11~?/!fr;."J/k~I7/~£,j~,1 llll& W::-r:' )~vchlJ'4-.f O.;'!~/ en ertl/~/Il:''' t CC'PIJf ~r tAc

liON £f~JIf'II!~lrt lfah v~j ];,1jJZ{;5. !';fet! vn tAl.. f/m.c4/!/rc:

fht? c-?jJlfCJI ~.5t .... d 7J'r/tIJp!f 1'1-:;-/'.: ~~/;y!/'..:.Jf.:;'d 14ft; (:1-'7

~J.:~~t~/!) . t//~'C f,7/' . Ci,~jlr?'/k.;t t/IJi!J. ;1;)1 ell: ,1:'/" v·/.'i:,?/,f,::,/b:!

l":/lit;-, c!5 fC/l:~JI'/J:

Va COIlO:/JI!~j Ulllfs

fVlClill()'/~J 1iJJt/f/m,-:/if : (/)(fl6;F(}{J )

Co1¥ratJr Vclit fystcms' (Ccoml'It1>.2 tj.2, 1a"..rr....)

;;'C.i5{Jrc Ifr::.tcf O::'Vlcej; (Cp!fv'f77, 7'1 -f IJ9j.2./JIYrh'V)

0fl~1! -ffj:~L LtnL.] : (COEL)(!;OI.66/Cap)

S.lfo/lk LcnlJ~,-6dl1J: (Csc)(/10a,bj~lJJjJk ~1l/}zi£;L1)'

7hc// 5tJmml' tAe;Jc:

C¥if~}/£5f _=: [{!V~;-o(j)f (c;;/l¥.)(/~2l/2>t{);· _

(CI'/{v )fll..7'/r ./y9F2.(}!)r(CtJ£I-)("iJI. CC)+{f:sc)(!:f!J8. 6/)]

~_Thnlf1jA~d'.fA/J. JIJCl/ln~f1t f),~ f~//{)v:,.!~/ f)'/)j/t.l/;. ~re :/'.fcd;· .

. .

. Ct.QflJjl :: (,tJmjJr~JJlr !:dunf. ','

C /

,1 A I I' ,.' I - bOy = '/r~rrl.lr/ .'" / ..... Ji"/f~# '1':"1'/'/ .r,,·- ~...AJf./I.~ t~" 1,.1._ - • .,.;-. £.,(Iv ! .

COEI- :: O~":::A -C//~,j L;J1~ C.t.:/l;/-

CSC :: J~¥::. C.7Iir..::dICFI L£/!//lt

CP ::: P()/11fl C:lt/nt.. ,. -CD

CO)

C?

co- '-------------------------------
DATE fZt(!I CHECKED DATE _

Mt££4IlL--.......J,fi:lLl~~;;J..:....L._ll.7i'*=- JOB NO. _

CALCULATION SHEET RADIAN

COR~ORA"'ON CALC. NO. __

:::,::"tz~ttt \...--JECT SHEET J OF 11£ SHEETS

£or e V2/i;//J!-::- A/f.·.:l.j !//:/'rl/J ~...,<' 1-/;.:1 4 II- -1/"1'" >:';.."/,,1:-; /'~ r - I /r/~v _!/J. /}&iJ '" - .., '/~y.. ..,,-- .,/,.. J

/

(,Ct'hI;; ::: 2

CPilI! := '11'

CtJt:t. :=. ILI/

C ;:. :r, .JC Jf/'~/J ;

Clj'it;/Cam = [(/ft)tJO) -f{2.)(J{;).tf2.·i6)1"('1)Pl7,7'1f~J2.~/) ..

-t(;ii/l;tJI,b6) 1- (35)f'lt1~b/)] :: .t2:2. 1)1 /

COIl!rtJlid Unitt

f'lbh;/;;riy.h.)tnj/11~lJt:

(otyJrcJ5/lr r::~t 5;:$tr;h1

lfCJJII/c Aelcf lJell~;

.q~/1 -Wed Lln4:

Sd;P£~itJlJn~cb;~J.:

( (,COlnp)('6;.J-'f2, l')

(C,dlly){Fl1,7i ;/;~i.i,t1/)-

I' .. - o .. (U-Afrf/kl f//I/fJ !J;JJ/~.e;;,tJJ /ll-,uk)

Ccsc~)(/.f;IJ8, 6/) . ...-

.. -. . .

.T!Jcn_svmmibj' tAz:sc;: .

[;,dU! (;;stf::' .(CconyJ)(~6;7'1Z,16)-I- -(Cj7R~)(1.77. 7'1 f.~~PJZ/;/):

I. \/.i' . _. . -.. J-tCSC.A ·~1J3. 6"/.)

C?

...

19 "'--------------=._---=---=--=--..:=::...:_:=..:..._.::---=..::.:.....:....----.:...~.,
CALCULATION SHEET

CALC. NO.

DATE~ CHECKED DATE

Mzn -,5i T JOB NO.

SHEET t( OF if SHEETS

..) SUBJECT _

CORPORATION

RADIAN

:~::::A~~

fer t:X~/)lJl/~, !'1flj~/ IJIJ:f C A.]".f fllc·/;I#wiy al/lils:

(,~l'Ijl ::;2

C PAv "If'

esc :::. 3)

th~/J.

~¥i6/(,adi ::: [(2X'6,J.tf2J!t") t(o/,'j/77,71~/J,6r.z.()I)-r(~rX/tft?9,61)]

;;:. l.2tJ~ 6.2SI'

{J )(fo;r~t1){(;,i3) ~\~ ..~~

(C~t7~I'X.to;·,2'f2. :;i)(o~7bj) .

Jl/l1lv;;/;Zd C?;I;;ICa)-t~ rtD+ 0.. 'j'OoJ f'O.~ f,...., & ~~O'I'

TAe:. CtI1/JI/CJ//zed c¥/'faICtlib WC/~ delc/'/hl/ld f 11Ikllit!fl/'q ....)

fhe c-¥Jilal ct'ff fffPI f-b, ~dd ?-/c P ~f(/Pl1/tfrrt .0/ tAr:. C~I;;/ ..

J?c,wvCt;t rdL: Or (C,fF)!?/" tA;;f &~ tiT~,,(/t/I/liC/1r. /?/r 1///;;'d/'t?lId

I./IJ/fJ rAe .cc5f r;f c1/1 Illlli.;! LIlIlI{ e.Vc;/lt. YYClJ&M1lt/at~d ,J/l(./ .. .

ddd~:I f~ tl,e r;7n/)lIiJ~:td c.;Jj/IId/ CVJt .' -~ .~. ..~. ;"':'."

\. -. . ( ('~ .

The CRF Vd//I~.J tlrc: (. - ' . A \ .;-

.- ?'-": (}:ja -hr.rtIjJfure disks 3/Jd #1/1/1/ j~ab- . . ~-: ..; 0,2.3 - hr. 1JJ,/J;ft1{!!/i il1stI'PII/L'.l/ts . -.. .. -

.),;:.;.----.0-,-,.;3 -17Jr ~1/--,1lif/r !Ita t'fL!fIJPm.c;;rC jnd ,htlti/IJ.JIIJ(-

',---- '._. . .... /2/;~r-., . . ---'-'.. -

U/lClJOIm!Iad !fn;tr

.. .-~ .: fIlo n;&rl, [,u&um~/if:

CoPljJreJStlr ~nt ~sfcl7Z5:

co

..r L....-
SHEETS

CALC. NO. __

OF /tf

HAUIAN \,;AL\,;ULA IIUN ::iHt:t: I

=-0 R P'O RAT ION

~IGNA~~RE/~~/#~ PROJECT lit . 4 LCdkf

CHECKED DATE _

JOB NO. _

\---JECT SHEET r:

.... "'"

-'"..

,1

fltCJJ{//,C' Ih/;~f !J~yic,e5: .

-(}/s!<s j. {C/l?v){/lJ, 7f)(0,;#) -h/j!:y tt::IIIO;CiC {C~AYY/~gf:1..~/){ 17, Ill)

u~~/i-6jedLInes: (Co~)(/ItJ/.b6)(1J,1{3)

SdllJjJle (p/J/Jec{icnJ: (esc )(.ttf~8,;/)(tJ,/,j)

ill;t;;! L/JAR:

G-as ~/vcs: ~f . - Mdl1iftJrlY.It (CV(f[(~~Jt~tlvcX /, Lit~/(3) 1l.l{7.

- /(ejldlr *~ (CvcrXo,lltfXo,2SYtf122.;XI. tfXtJ./~J)

L'fvit1 lI:J/vc;: - fVk"lJll#rliy~ (Cv'-)(~2..J/~jye)(I,'1)((}./{J)

1{t:jl~Ir"~ CL. vt.X(J.(};;io.:-X~»22J"X/. t.f)(tJ.lb3)

.\

_ ./.. ... " . ... ., ~~I{(w~.. ~.; l.~.....~c.".-.

-( ~:I/J;tl:J1 LlJA/? hJllnl!lJrlj Ct?.fCr ,;rc c:JlcvJgfd J.J.:

~1. (r;./)'f1C~ nfCP~n f)6vp~Afrddilr /1,/):&, ric)('!tJi~...3fC~r IiJIJ1;nlfldw, ..,. .

'~'__ .t1l/jUjl;AJ(C/{~ """-lJ" C<'-ij:,.J ;".<',' ".J ' --0

. "----,. .) r I' ~~

'. ~- ·.**X1Jb;;.j·Lf}AI< iqE/r cr;Ji5 (Ire cPJkV'lafd~5: .~c~~.~

..;,<". - {Cdlh~/i01t- &t/1r)(kjli~j.kak rr':-(t·;,~yrI7dCflQ'n to//.4niy ;~~/rXAlJvrJ.: .

frrre;tOlr)(/;;);t/' CdJr[l/!Jr])('1P7p I~C,.!'tlic: -Ipr flt!lIli"tSIf1/1;f){CI<i=) ._

co

l3

ll?- '-------------------.:......----------__...J ...,
CALC. NO. __

CHECKED DATE _

CALCULATION SHEET

JOB NO. _

..)

SUBJECT_______________________________ SHEET~£_ OF I&' SHEETS

Pomp; - MtJn; f7rlllY (cjJXFZ,J/;-.:///)(;, i)((},/{})

/ 'Z~?,

- l?ejJJlr (Cp)(O,£¥o,7FXI6)f22,rX'/.t/)(o,/{})

- /(1J1JccJ!;~:;f ~1.J~ (C,l1)(~2.){O,7)V!!(}/;cal){C,7i)

WIJII~{,t~rj :

- fV!pl1/ttJrJy (CWI1)(!j,J!ct1/J )(/,tf)(tJ./F3)

- f?;:di/~ ( Cet'n )(0,02./YO.Z))(2X'i2.,rYi, 'Iib,lf})

Lf!i~/ tlJ/J1? 7;fd/ if fllt/7 .I .." ./ ./

(Cvc;)(I, /;6) -I- (Cvt.XtJ. fOl/) 1- (CjJ)(2.8, FJJ) -r(CcoN)((),62'1)

TAcll.

,,/

AIJI1/JiJtid C<fJ/b/ Ctl.5fs =[(;',oJYo.23)+(C41m,tJ'f{,l'1.2,'II'f116J)+ '

((,P/(v177. 7~iXo,Jg)t (cfl/{Yf 3df:2.~/ 163) f (Ct:J~)(itll.6;Xa/;lJr

.' (C;c'ftfCg,'61XO.l6.J) f ( Cv(T)(I, 1;6)f{r; V~){rJ.1tJt/) r(C,o)(29. if}) +..

·-(C;N)(O,~Zt/)]. - -.

..

....

...

. ~- f1u!JJjJJ' !JQI/~:Jn c1dd/f;J1~/ t~/'m f;r /C/IaCC:;/Il.#//{.FQ/s =.

. . ". (/Jvp1/l C(JVllfJ;~di;/i~J..Frc'l/t't'n~y)(fr3dAJd fqviriy r9E;/J1&:;t;/~/IIrAf:

Jed/ (f/5t)(CI?F) ... a.......- --- _._._-.. <q' Cl?
OF If SHEETS

CALCULATION SHEET . RADIAN

COR I» 0 R A ,. ION CALC NO .._-- '~IGN~~UPF1-:f/~ DATE ~fJ CHECKED DATE _

PROJECT /j.f1lY... e,._~f !X;uL.ZO_-.,LI.o\Q""""""cu....lt!~l£=:..... JOB NO. _

~JECT----- SHEET 7

~r ~;t2/7'I;/e/ I1tJJ~/I)Jli 8 h~ fl~. fP/kJ/'l11j cet/hts:

CCvlt/P =: 2 [coN :: .2./06"2

. CI'/(V :: tfJ Cw; =iFI

C OEt.. =- 1'1/ C Vt- l/71f

esc =3SCp = Jfo

Alil1!1~:li:L:'-1 L7;:b! t~:+ ::: [(b~Wlj.2})r(2Y{2¥2.tf{X~,llj) J, ,

('ffY7J, 71)(0,rg)-r (/rr}gf1.,~ifo'/£3)+- (lil)(ltJ/,66)((),1fj)r

(')fX'14~~GtXC,/;})+-(qltfXI.J~j)-f- {//lr;Yo, 1:11)f (~iX~".FfJ)-f(i{6iXrJ,bl'!J:

. ::=:/12;82 fv'

. COil tIll/led th,;&

(Cf'At~77. 71X(}~~#) .....

(CjJIIy)('3If'J.,oi)(/l,/{3) .

(Csc)''I(J~6/){(;~/oj)·.·.. -._

.. C(JmflI'C5.s~I' iflJf }.sfCAJ5: . - - .

Prc:sJvrt. Ifc/;.d f)c'Y!c~;

- ...... .. .. -/4fk .. .._... --:-fklJ~/f, /t;//lCf, ~fc.

J;pYJlc·- [,t'~A~cfi;~5 : . -_.._-

fnell,

A~nvat'z.~d·C¥;folrust; == [(C~h1;)(6;2t/2.'16)(a/63!.~ .- .

-~ .... ... :(C1Jltr)(77, 71XO»8).f(C~l(yJ;gj).,iJi)(tJ,/6J) +·cCsc)el(~9#b/)(a/{3)J.

...

lD

M

C?

...

co """'""-------------...-.-.....:...-----_~ ....J..;
-I

RADIAN CALCULATION SHEET ."

CORPORATION CALC. NO.

:::.::-~ft DAT~{(,:i~ CHECKED DATE

/If/2n') ), JOB NO.

SUBJECT SHEET Il OF It" SHEETS

.ft/r eX3I1p/C/ I'1/lJ1/ (J/J/"t £ ;'~f lAc 1;;/~wPy cCt'"l1fs;

(C~II'" == 2.

Cf/I{y =. :11

CJ( =:};

AnnfJhi~~1 C~jf~/. [,~)f =[ (2)(;.2.'/Z. it)(O,II})-t(1FX77, 7t.f)(b,J$-r

(t/iX)8;2./J/YO,/63) t-{J,Y'/IJP, 61)(OJ6J)] =-/Y16FtJ v"

AIJI1//rlh"i--;1 ap"-/dfio/ cPJt

77Jc 3hlJ//8/ !JIle/'df;~f ads c1/'c fA~ ,9/J/e f~/' VI1tz1l1f,.cllId JAd

c.cnffi/(/d tI/J/b. 1IJe .:J/JIJI/d/ t'fJc/'~-/;'j U'5t AdS Ice/) ,or;N/1 t&WIl

/htrJ. tArce jJ;;t/lJ1 /Vbjld~1l3I1ce CM'J4 .Misc~!tJlJaJtlJ Ch~4/ e7lJd

/.~/;.:'r .~!J:7'')C:5, d5 f?/bW5~

!J.,1IJ1J~/ /'1;PIIt:'J).JIJc,c, (/l31J£,J:

. _.' - rh~ __ m~/hft:Aant(: dalJ~ !5 ,-~ af th~ c;;/;ifaluJt.,c;,~ -.~ ctJ/I1jJ;:t".f5:1~.J / jJrc:.sJ!lrc /'cIJef deVIce;> ~cn -cnd'ai. //AC5~ tiMII JJlIljJle.. "

.,~pnec.tJbll~;;. FiJr /17I//I'fo/;1/.. //lffI'I/IIlC/i& fIJe. flJ3,ffifclJJIJCt:. .C./;3~~ -!

--. \ --- IS ./!l2BtJ,. IIJ-c: d/JOI/<I/./CA;')C ~r 11IhJ/-.fC,,;!J.lf p;ue:d PI) flr~ .

,n/J./l10t:L .pl 11/111f1.f.r~J'~/rdC:l~h j'c;;;r'. - . ,

... ,t ." .. -t' , /.'

MlltJl ~my- kfl"!/IfJ~1J '. 'I2!(] .

...{g~jJr~s5prs:.. ._(CCQI11,t7.r.f~.i 1/2>tl)(1J;tJf) .

. .Pr~Jtr~ 'l1L::-bd' f)~v/~ .:. ,.. : _') . - . _.. . . .-f)lslv_ .. .._- ..(Cf1/(V)~l7, 71-Yaa) . . - .-j/PlJd5, 0J/v~, efc .([IJRv){/J9£Z-tJiX(),()a)

--~ ;: McmtJr;;odv/ll frdM 11J..W;"ttA.xt;;l-/l .1# ..0, !1;rlwilrJik/A7 ~n;'aJ. CdJ-f:

.. LPl ;;cts A4l ~if. & II~IJ!. ff(vjpmclrt .tc;aks ~~. ,J.//;5Jr/ p_ /~ . _ . ,_ ..
CALCULATION SHEET

DATEgP/rl CALC. NO.

CHECKED DATE

Nan-sa MI JOB NO.

SHEET 7 OF IE SHEETS

.RADIAN

CURPORATION

:::.::~!fif ~UBJECT _

()fJ~/J -&/d LII1=5: (Coe-'fI;O/'6"6){tJ.tJJ) .

5anyJk Ctln,Je:cibn5: (csc){lr(}9,6/){~.I).J)

fl/R1jl5cCJu: (C/l)(iiXa;;Yg7J)(.r/80)

Anl/v;;/ M/5ec:/{;I1CdfJ5 CIJd/yeJ; .\'~"; ,;. . ,

rhe. !}liJce~r1lJfJ!l5 CA~'7.~5 :l/': C;J!cvkJ fc:J ~J 1% t7f f!;~ . /

::'j/}/~~ iJ.::ft rt.1r IhclJ,t"/i/'j IIJJffl//Il~/1f~ c{)mll'~J5:7/J/ jJr~5SlJrc I~t~r

~{~t'(: -::'J.. f.,II:"/J - -.'Id.d.. /ih~J J/1tl .5JPp/c: ~/Jl1a fglJf. T4.= c'~IJc:.

fer Ilt/llljJ ;~CJ,1.s If ~% ;/~ f!J~ d'lJlJlla/ 1n3111fcfi,91JCC cA:Jrp &r ,!J111J!jl

5?dls.

I'IJrlJ:t.:-rj/l ];,5tfl/m:;IJf: (l~rtltiXalJ'I) ...

l:,·lil lr::'.i50rf: (C~o/)(/(2r2,11{)(().tJ1)

PtCJS{//~ ~7tdf}~vICc5:

.- !J;5KJ (C,tJ/fv){j17..71)(O.~tj) -flpj);..5, J(;)/'vc.f, de (Cfl/{V)l;fJ,gj2.,O!XfJ.&tf)

?lJ7c'11 -clJA'd 1.//14'.: (C()et){I/tJl.{{)(().t?'I) .

S;~/k (P1J1J~f/~;;-; (C5c)('t(fJ$.CI)(();/;4) .

jJt/~)jJ j~/; ; (Cp )(/zYcJ./vYO,7fl(/;8tJXfJ.8tJ)

.-

lD

. B...

co ----------------.:..:.:.:...-.:.:.=:....-...:...---=-_.....::.---=--:....:._--:.-....J .;.
SHEETS

CALCULATION SHEET

CALC.NO. ___

CHECKED DATE _

JOBNO.

SUBJECT SHEET /R OF !Ii

Annual L:;!JtJr C!J3ye!-.f: .

/he: dhllLJJ! Ybflr C;/;dlje.s c.8l'/ Jc fj//'f!Jer d/v;tld litftJ

twP jJtirfl;/lJ"/ /../JII/I mt71l/lbl'ity cJ/1J{ /..(}/JI? r~fJd;rJ/df

Ic/ltlW5; .

!1,,";f~/(n1 *":

./

GCl5 KJ/VC; (CvG-XJ2)({j.){;.'I)

Lil/Itfvid tMvei (CVL){;ijFz)O,'I)

PVIl1fJ5 ** (C,P){12)(Iz)(1,'/) -I- (C;)(fZ)(O·X(}!:u.r'fJ,tf)"

Connectors CCc,P/f)(1){I'z.){/. if)

fr::S5!J/"C II.::./icf j}'::l/IC~J {Cjl!?V'f/)(/z)(;,if)

o ' ***

'1ejl3Ir:

'Ct:l5 J,;;/Ve5 (CvG-XO,02){;LXtJ,2F)(i)(t.iZ,FXi,L;) ....

..-*LOAIf M~~ifv~11lj CdJt / (CQP1j1t'I'.:'t:f ~I/nf)(11(J1J:'6rilj5"i~)(;1p/i;br'7 rx)(ro7c !/JGr~;~ ,

for AJIJJ~/!fflffMIJ cf5o/Pcrl)

~fu/J1f MtllJi&£/1y I;~f dJl1 <7~'t7Lj/fJ/I1~/ term fe, vVc~kf: vlsp,}/IlJI/IJJi:?riy;

. Cfl/J'yJ (dull1){r2YVhfr)(/0;)l7lin/,tJ/JP1/J4i; ~i,,/nr))(/..t7/;#/' toy![-Ul'])(tf()$ fncl"c~

-~Lb,4R 4ft1;r cP5f:- (Cp/1l~/Je/TI-~l/llt)(LcJkFrql/c/lr)(M/7/1;&;;'f~/')(rr;)cli~~ - ~~

.. l'CflJ/ri'!j l'C}id;~YhlJu/5/rcIJlr)(/.3/JJr [p.ff[01,])('10% /li(r~/JK -h,;IJ1lI1iJf tf5t//) co

"""'-----------------------~ "'
OF ,II" SHEETS

R·AD.AN CALCULATION SHEET

CORPORATION . CALC.NO.__

' SIG~~TU.-!~,h~ DA~E CHECKED __ DATE _

DROJECT~~ 4h~d--""5......u.(E;j~1I1 [ __JOB NO. _

~BJECT_--......,..._------ SHEET 1/

'&AI LflJ':/ J{p/Y~J

tV/lylJ

(cIMecffJrJ

(CVLYZt/Z)U2)(o.2J){tt){/zz,;JU,1)

CCflXt1,/jX/~a7jX!b)(/22_JX/,L/) .

·(Cc()ll)((},(}()J){I)({-~J.rY2)(/22,j)(lt.f)

The ~-nllL";/ ~;J~/~-;lo/ C~rl5 cun' ;}.~f.'~.;J/;.!;dj d5 ~/!'l!·r::/;

A/}!JtJ~1 vjJ~r:f/'Y (.{'JI :::: ['t-/2BO iJc,flJo[ao'l) +-(Cup/,IJ)&2'12. t/{)(allftv,v;

IeI/?VX'71 7t/)(o.(}yftJ,C'~) f {C//(V)(I.1,!71. .o/iv-ortti.tJr) -f- (CjI,fy)(!.z, 8) .

t-(C{je/.YJ/#I.C6Xo.orf(J,07)-f(cscXi~()8.6/)(;;,()2fo.~i) of

(C;)(12)((),lo)(a, 7,'t/;!{))(/ t(},O) l(c;;'f;;.fI2YI,tJ)-r

({,fl)(~2)(ti%J)(lzJ-.r)(1,1) -f- (c;;Xo,/oYI2Xf), 7nUb)(12.??)(1,1)

(Cv6-)(1z)(fz)(/,t-f) -t (Cvtr)(o,lj2fIJ.Yo.J-,X1f!u,J)(I,'I) -r.

(CIIL.tI2)(:7-)(£ L/) +(Cv~)((}.()2)U2){tJ,27J(t/)(I.zZfX/' 'I) 1-

CCa;IV)(I){lZ)(/. tI) I- (CcPP/)(c,o(}7){iYtJ.1 f-)(;!.)(/22,5)(/.4)]

. 4JAv;JI tJ;;2"d6" Cdst =[1'/280 +~60 -t-(CG;y/p)(/b2Lf2.tff){(},or)r

. (Cfll?v'ft77. 7r'ftj,()r)+-{cfllt(,.:YJi12,~/ft;,(J9)t- (ClllvY2.8) + . /

(C(leLX!/tJ/~6'&'jb,09) +(esc PtfIJ8,61)(0.or} r{C;;X!7fY.. '/J) t-

.-

.....- (CvG-)(l41./6) +·{(vt.)((I/I./b) f (CcPI/)(2,gi87J)

co

M

c:

.-

L-.- -.:.......----= '9 ..-~.~..:...:.;_.:..:.....--=.=------=----=..::..._---.J
CALCULATION SHEET

c.

DATE:lif

CALC. NO.

CHECKED DATE

t1,0o ,5(; JOB NO.

SHEET /2 OF IE SHEETS

RADIAN

CO !I.p o. A,. ION

:~:::~R~ SUBJECT _

~,r CXdl!ljJ/:!: /Yhj~/ !hIt If iJ.JJ t!J~ !"/hY/''I!1 //1/;,/';/ q;~/~f., G,,~t:

AI7[~:;/ '1.·<,.;·1;~7 L.::Jt =[ltj;Z:-~7 r ~U/ -r (2X/6.211, tJtf)((J,Cr)f

('1)1'77. 7!/Yacl)-r(If.IJr/J8a.l1Yo,~r)7 (/./rX~,g)i-(1'1;f/;c1/,fbjO.ll)

1- (JIJ)('"I()!6/)(J,tJtj) -{- {7ilP712.tid 1- ( 7/tJY/1//'15)';-(;17J'f/7/' /0)

-r (2b/;;)(Z,87ff7fJ =: //2t;;2// v

-r;oj Aao!l.JJ {fst

fA L. tota/ c7-1Jf}V;JI c/J:;-( I S fl~. 5!/III .rt f!J:: Jon/!tJdhZ::;'/

CC:l/J .L~/' , > ~f "", j ~L.;,' ...~n ./..,1 .. ,.-··1·,. .,..-I- .-..J 0;,'/!,7 Lt._) .::-iZ . . //- c;;.'u;v~. -1' /d./// ,-!.l,\lJ /

TCftJl AlilJiI.3/ = ! 1I1i!J,!d/tu1) + (J-)iiPl/d! 0'::'1:;1'1) Cost tG~::fi/ 0""i' . c~if '

.1--" '_'"..., '~i/~ 1I/1 ..I~/ .......:. l,' ~~., fL-/ ./-.ii"Jl1l\· :;.f~i 1:r/-I ,.:r .!....-··://IJ· ..- • I"I/~~I ;",.. h I) 1,1..;.:, • /;_ ' _ It:. t.·,.,! '. !.cl /11,.,: .r

(~ff / .

7c fJ/ 1i1IVd/;: hl.2J2'1 -I- 1/,ztI,.7I! := 1/7.2,fJt/t! v

[~J. . .

M

CDc:

co-

• L....- ----.-.I
CALCULATION SHEET

CALC. NO.

DATE£rhf CHECKED DATE

tlkn - JOB NO.

SHEET (J OF If SHEETS

.RADIAN

CURPORA'I'ION

'::::"~r ~UBJECT _

8d5C/;~C:_ emlffJrm[

TIJ-= ad}:::: lilJe C/JJ/5SIfIJ5 fc,r bt' fA t/I/UJllf///Icd. d/ICI Uollfrtl//d..

v'flirJ JVC/~ cd/cv&b:d t;". /lJl/lfti~,~JtI file ~'1vfplJJt'l1i Ult/IJ f5 0/ tJi~ e/llI.f5"ltlA ,c:Jcft?/J" jJ«f~/Jfuj ~bw'.

TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF EQUIPMENT LEAK voe EMISSION FACTORS~

Equipment

Valves

Pump Seals

Compressor Seals

Pressure

Relief

Devices

Connectors1

Open-ended Lines

Sampling

Connections

MACT

Controlled

Baseline Emission Factors Emission ------------_._-. Factors

Service Uncontrolled CTG (kg/hr) (kg/hr) Controlled

(kg{hr)

Gas 0.0056 0.002 0.0001216

Light Liquid 0.0071 0.004 0.000717

Heavy Liquid 0.00023 0.00023 0.00023

Light Liquid 0.0494 0.0331 0.00248

Heavy Liquid 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214

Gas/Vapor 0.228 0.153 0.0223

Gas/Vapor 0.104 0.0582 0.0

All 0.00083 0.00083 0.000345

All· 0.0017 0.0 0.0

All 0.015 0.015 0.0

1eonnectors include flanges and screwed connections.

co

<')

CO?

..

G?

.....------------------------------ ---1",
CALCULATION SHEET 't.

SUBJECT SHEET f/f

RADIAN

co; .PO.A,.. 0 N CALC.NO. _

:::::A~~~'-.F-;1..t:::.-'~.....::.I~~·..L----I-4Mu,L.IJ~'_l_AT__'_~,..u..f£~~~-J.:I@;;....I__J:::C:E_D======_D_AT_E=======

OF Iff SHEETS

ttjAf L'f./I'd /1JPJjJJ

IICd~ litui:J !fop,/)"

Ccml/~55!Jr.5

""'lit

'1P!

1171

7/

1#

J

.2lt2

It//

3~.

8Clsejit~ fttiuklJ1{{ylhr)

(lfltf){at~f7) = 2.3/81

(1179jd.otJ7;) =: 8, 370r.

(7/)@.tJaJ23);: 0,01633

(tftJ)(a(Jtf'l1);: I. '176

(,XO-Q,Zltf) = 0, /07

(2)(tJ.228):= 0, iyG

(o,J.n{Lj,)(o,/v1) /,17

(o.75XtlJJfJ.0f82)~ /, f6'12F.

(Zb6.z»'IJClJ93) == 2.2V'f'l6

(O.)(J11}(J.rJ(;/1) ;. 0

(J,XO-IJ/r) :: 0,)"2£"

/'!,/IJ3'1 kj/hr./

-- if.fi ". .- . - ,. , '-- . .. . . .. .. o' • .

_. @C~ dr~ t:.~.5.Jtlm_d ttl /;c.c~··'/)fr:1//d 3t otJJc/;l/<::; I.

[}c5e .:lr~. C-1l/1JIsft'lJt._~/fi~ f!Je,5~CM£ IIJI15. __ . . _', CD

C"l

c:

-

.;. "'-----------------------------'
OF /£ SHEETS

RADIAN CALCULATION SHEET

co.• P OR A'I'I ON CALC.NO. _

.:;:J::R~~~f da;~Jfgll/ J::~:'ED __- DATE _

~UBJECT SHEET If:

rA::: ::J)//J5/~1 r:';-;(f,''c:f:i/S c/;'1C C,7 Ie tllald 1Y 5t1ffnJcfin.r f1c

U'/lf/"t'lk"f ~/J/lfJ/:J/i.J/ wh/c~ J/"t::. C<7/ctlkfcd l/f/Z f/;e Milerc.?/11i.~"//::L :Ji' &/"f fr.;//1 T:;~/e t f'/"!:/I/ fAe. 8C1JC bile ~/lJ;jJI(;I1J.

Ib/ CXJ/lp/e. I .IJJI/Y

Erv;lwc/lf r:VPG~ ;GIll:::;

L';ht J.if"t/d JI?/K.J 1t~'7 Litod J{;h"C'J

. .

CllJ /~1:5f{//'C

J1~//~f IkwC~..f

f'/bk/ !hJlf g:

.!1/t[&rf0'!!~d tRJIJ5/;7t.a.(f;lAr)

(J.//i)(tJ. ()(}(JFl./!) = ~tl5?lJ£j.2t/

(/179XIJ.~~07/7}::: 0,8'1;3'13

(7/)(tJ,@,1.2J) = a0/6 33

('1l)({j,~p;?Jlj):::: O,Ol/tlz.

.: ..))(tJ.f/,)./tf) ::: (),/07

(2)(O..tJ223):::: {}, 0 '1tfD

(lfr){o) . = 0

~. . .-- .. . , -.-

-- CfJ!1//:::c:.£r.J

J;;t'~-£A1d Liflt!}

j~ qjllf.. Cv/lIJC1i;1~

(26~J..)(at1t1tJ.j'lr) :.. 0,r1#3'1

,(1,/1)(0) ::: 0

:(3f)(O) .. :=~.o:.---_~

2.,tJtf/2()F'I1!flr v·

._~£IJJI'.s;/Pft ~~jl/cf;bJ1 ~. [ (;6.7, 'iJl1yfrl. -

- (j,/;8JyAr/ij;IJ!Jr}r)(/!1j;7tff#kjJJ';' /lff.iu ~~r .;

...

lD

C")

t?

...

to '-------------.--'- ...:...-.-..:..:.:-.-.-=---.......:.........::..:::.:......-....::.=~-=.:._.::.=...:_...:...:.:.........J ..;.
SUBJECT SHEET if

't""DIAN

...,.ICf»RPORA'I'ION I~IG~~TUR~!/f! PROJECT /' if

CALCULATION SHEET

CALC. NO. ' ..

DATE 5;/;;;(tL CHECKED DATE _

4~/pnt.l---5"""""(;'"'""~/;...&.,;ttlJ.A7i~- JOB NO. _

OF ~I'OC~ SHEETS

Net fVJ/J/ld/ fc:;t.= (-r;/.;/ AOI/v,';) _(C/lJl.JJrOl) )(//F% ') . Cdst ) \ ;f4!tJ:::-ii#1l ( . My -;

f..z ~:-1:J/lfI;'/~/ l/;i'Y l1p'j~ / 1/;';;/ 8

jY-::,f AIJI!!I.8/ .;= ((/72/PJ//J) - (!'If. Iff/1q!rr){/t£''1,//t1~ y", tr;;2a:;7~ : ,.) CO 'T .=" ;I'/--_. ;- /

~.~05·t· E£<XftvcocjJ·

--'~T1~ 'cP,fL d-kcf;v~IJC5f··f'vrcdL/; vllif W.dlJ c;JIc~~c;;~ .._- .~-; .. -t:bv!t/;1f fAc: 1lfillIJ1711al{t"ff 0/ tAc. .ffAI!. C/l}jfj"/ul!. r:::bctp/J. -

~t1r ;)ilJ~~~J,iJ$1J ;c)~::f2:~fJ ~~-1f c.,7kt/~~WJPr '~v/?!;~~/~ ih-::-. .Y.Je. ~/l}/J.JIOJ /dYCf~·/} Jy file lI./)jJ.J J/t7C I:::lli~ v:"f 78,

___ CcJ"t ---. --. ~.. (iv~t 4/)~JJ4ICc(tJ _

___ _Eltaf;JKn~S5 _ .6fJCE/1IIifi!lIIl~4t::lJ!/IJ)({}'-7#)_

.:. ..-fpr. eM'~k, !J.f!y fYbtklait 6': ~. . .

·:·Cnl ..... -.:!b: 7IJ1J) . - ·YJio/11;~ e-ffa6fJCIlC55 - (/11,/!J.-~!t;r- (l,78) - ...

co .-

...

C9 '------------------------_---..",
RADIAN

CORPORATION

Progress Center

3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd.lNelson Hwy.

P.O. Box 13000

Research Triangle Park. N.C. Tl709

Mr. David Markwordt (919) 541-9100

u. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Chemical and Petroleum Branch (MD-13)

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

5 June 1991

Dear Dave:

Enclosed are three copies of the memorandum describing impacts

from the control of VHAP emissions from equipment leaks in nonSOeMI process units. At the request of Bob Rosensteel, a copy of

this memorandum is being sent to Randy McDonald.

A copy of the May 28, 1991 memorandum from Larry Sorrels

documenting emission reduction and control costs for fugitive

emissions from polybutadiene production and styrene-butadiene

production has been received and reviewed. Those impacts were

developed based on different equipment counts and a different

costing procedure. The information presented in this memo has

been developed independently and does not reflect the values

presented in Larry Sorrels' memorandum.

Please feel free to contact me or Ken Hausle if you have any

questions or comments on the enclosed memorandum.

Sincerely,

Associate

f::;K~ Engineer

/jkb.076

cc: R. Colyer, EPA (MD-13)

J. Crenshaw, Radian

J. Meyer, EPA (MD-13)

R. McDonald, EPA

K. Hausle, Radian

J. Stelling, Radian

M. Stockton, Radian

B. King, Radian