alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3113-002]


Texas Utilities Electric Company; Notice of Filing

November 26, 1997.
    Take notice that, on November 14, 1997, Texas Utilities Electric 
Company (``TU Electric'') tendered for filing an open-access Tariff for 
Transmission Service To, From and Over Certain HVDC Interconnections 
(``TFO Tariff'') and amendments to four transmission service agreements 
with Central Power and Light Company, West Texas Utilities Company, 
Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power 
Company, previously designated as Rate Schedule FERC Nos. Two through 
Five, in compliance with the Commission's October 15, 1997 ``Order 
Accepting Revised Transmission Tariffs for Filing, As Modified, and 
Granting Waiver of Notice Requirements''.
    Copies of the filing were served on all parties of record.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before December 9, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31644 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
S:\CHARTS\4Q-REPORT.12.Docx December 28, 2012 (11:53 AM)

Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending 

October 1 – December 31, 2012

Board 

Approval Date Country Amount Type U.S. Position Background

11/19/2012 Liberia SDR 51.68 million

($78.9 million)

ECF Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2012/pr12449.htm

[No U.S. Gray Statement]

11/28/2012 Solomon Islands SDR 1.04 million

($1.59 million)

ECF Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2012/pr12479.htm

11/30/2012 Mexico SDR 47.292 billion

($73 billion)

FCL Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2012/pr12465.htm

12/17/2012 Seychelles ($10.23 million) EFF 

Augmentation

Support http://www.imf.org/external/n

p/sec/pr/2012/pr12490.htm
#### Frankie Lee DAVIS v. Joanne Patricia Cody DAVIS.

Civ. 1416.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1978.

Allen W. Howell, Montgomery, for appellant.

Joseph G. L. Marston, III, Prattville, for appellee.

*725WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

This is a divorce case. Defendant husband appeals. The issues are stated to be: (1) The trial court abused its discretion in the award of alimony and child support; (2) the court abused its discretion in the award of attorney fees to the wife. This court finds the issues are not well taken and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The award of alimony, child support and attorney fees to the wife in a divorce action is a matter within the discretion of the trial judge, and will not be reversed on appeal except for palpable abuse. *Pruett v. Pruett,*333 So.2d 580 (Ala.Civ.App.1976). Our review of the evidence in this case indicates no abuse of discretion.

There is no unusual issue of prece-dential value in this case. We therefore present only a limited resume of the evidence. The defendant left the connubial home while the wife and two children were visiting out of town. He began living with another woman and openly continued to do so at the time of hearing. There were two small girls born of the marriage. Defendant is a Federal Civil Service employee. His net earnings are $996.73 per month. The wife had not been employed for several years, but had gained temporary employment since her abandonment by the husband. She had inherited stock of a value of several thousand dollars and had converted inherited real estate into cash. The cash had been placed on savings in her name, her husband’s name and in the names of the children.

The court gave to the wife title to the home (with its indebtedness), most of its furnishings, a Blazer automobile, the inherited stock and the remainder of the inherited cash. The husband retained a 1977 pickup truck, other vehicles and a camper. Alimony was granted in the amount of $50 per month and child support in the amount of $300 per month. In December 1980 alimony was to increase to $125 per month and child support to $400 per month. Attorney fee in the amount of $800 was awarded to the wife. The husband was required to continue payment on accrued family debts.

It is evident that the defendant must live carefully and frugally in order to meet his obligations, and pay the support and alimony directed. However, the evidence indicates that he can do it from his income. He may need to dispose of some of his personal property, such as the 1977 pickup truck, and thus reduce his indebtedness. However, he chose to travel the road he is now on. The alimony and support he is directed to pay is only about one-third of his net income. It is not more than is needed by his wife and children and is not more than he is able to pay. We affirm the judgment below.

A $300 attorney fee is given the wife on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2391 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2391

To direct the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Veterans' Employment and 
Training to carry out a pilot program on short-term fellowship programs 
                             for veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

  Mr. Cawthorn (for himself, Mr. Banks, Mr. Mann, Ms. Tenney, and Mr. 
Moore of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Veterans' Employment and 
Training to carry out a pilot program on short-term fellowship programs 
                             for veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Fellowship Act''.

SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM ON SHORT-TERM FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMS.

    (a) Authority.--The Assistant Secretary of Labor for Veterans' 
Employment and Training shall carry out a pilot program under which a 
State may use a grant or contract under section 4102A(b)(5) of title 
38, United States Code, to carry out a short-term fellowship program.
    (b) Locations; Agreements.--The Secretary shall select at least 
three, but not more than five, States to carry out a short-term 
fellowship program pursuant to subsection (a). Each such State shall 
enter into an agreement with a non-profit organization to carry out 
such program.
    (c) Short-Term Fellowship Program.--Each short-term fellowship 
program carried out by a State pursuant to subsection (a) shall--
            (1) consist of veterans participating as fellows with an 
        employer for a period not exceeding 20 weeks;
            (2) provide to such veterans a monthly stipend during such 
        period; and
            (3) provide to such veterans an opportunity to be employed 
        on a long-term basis with the employer following such period.
    (d) Comptroller General Report.--Not later than four years after 
the date on which the pilot program commences under this section, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees 
on Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 
report on the pilot program.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--In addition to funds made 
available under section 4102A(b)(5) of title 38, United States Code, 
there is authorized to be appropriated to the Assistant Secretary to 
carry out the pilot program under this section $10,000,000 for each of 
fiscal years 2021 through 2025.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 11.2 CPI Corp.
Computation of Per Common Share Earnings (Loss) - Basic(Unaudited) thousands,
      except share and per share data
    12
      Weeks EndedApril
      30, 
      2005
    
    May
      1,
      2004Basic:Net
      loss applicable to common shares:From
      continuing operations
    $
    (2,058
    )
    $
    (7,649
    )From
      discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    (1,149
    )Net
      loss
    $
    (2,058
    )
    $
    (8,798
    )Shares:Weighted
      average number of commonshares
      outstanding
    
    18,449,151
    
    
    18,366,028Less:
      Treasury stock - weighted average
    
    (10,639,543
    )
    
    (10,265,456
    )Weighted
      average number of common andcommon
      equivalent shares outstanding
    
    7,809,608
    
    
    8,100,572Net loss
      per common and common equivalentshares:From
      continuing operations
    $
    (0.26
    )
    $
    (0.95
    )From
      discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    (0.14
    )Net
      loss
    $
    (0.26
    )
    $
    (1.09
    )
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the “ Company“) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “ PeriodicReport “), I, Michael J. Shea, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 9, 2004 |   |   |                     |   | /s/ Michael J. Shea |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   |             |   |   | Michael J. Shea          |
|   |             |   |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

﻿

﻿

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

﻿

﻿

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andreas Rouvé, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

﻿

|  | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

﻿

|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company |
|--|----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

﻿

﻿

|   | /s/ ANDREAS ROUVÉ  |
|--------|------------------------------|
| Name:  | Andreas Rouvé           |
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer      |
| Date:  | November 16,  2017 |

﻿

﻿

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

﻿

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

﻿

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136135 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LINSDEY M. MAREK, Deceased, STEVEN B.

MAREK, Guardian of Surviving Child, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136135 

 COA: 279607 

WCAC: 06-000041 

S.B. MAREK, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 19, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Workers’ Compensation 

Appellate Commission solely for the ministerial task of issuing an order that conforms to 

the Commission’s opinion regarding the minor child’s entitlement to death benefits after 

500 weeks. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ComputerHorizons Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Dennis Conroy, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, does hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

1.             thePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.             theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  | July 2, 2006 |                    | /s/ Dennis Conroy |
|--------|--------------|-------------------------|-------------------|
|   |         | DENNIS CONROY           |              |   |
|   |         | Chief Executive Officer |              |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Computer Horizons Corp. and will beretained by Computer Horizons Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of thisPeriod Report or as a separate disclosure document.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2458 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2458

  To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify that the 
 definition of a debt collector includes, in all cases, a person in a 
business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security 
                               interests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2021

 Mr. Auchincloss introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify that the 
 definition of a debt collector includes, in all cases, a person in a 
business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security 
                               interests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Non-Judicial Foreclosure Debt 
Collection Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTERESTS.

     Section 803(6) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 
U.S.C. 1692a(6)) is amended by striking ``For the purpose of section 
808(6), such term also includes any person who uses any instrumentality 
of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal 
purpose of which is the enforcement of security interests.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63567-63568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIMES AND DATES: 1:00 p.m., Monday, December 8, 1997; 8:30 a.m., 
Tuesday, December 9, 1997.

PLACE: Costa Mesa, California, at the Westin South Coast Plaza Hotel, 
686 Anton Boulevard, in the Santa Ana Room.

STATUS: December 8 (Closed); December 9 (Open).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Monday, December 8--1:00 p.m. (Closed)

1. Audit Committee Report and Review of Year-End Financial Statements.
2. Strategic Outsourcing.
3. A Strategic Alliance Program.

Tuesday, December 9--8:30 a.m. (Open)

1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, November 3-4, 1997.
2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer.
3. Semiannual Report to Congress on Summary of Investigative Activities 
[Actions Under 39 U.S.C. 3005 and 3007].
4. Fiscal Year 1997 Audited Financial Statements.
5. Fiscal Year 1997 Annual Report of the Postmaster General.

[[Page 63568]]

6. Final FY 1999 Appropriation Request.
7. Capital Investments.
    a. Radio Frequency Identification (RFI) Project.
    b. Boise, Idaho, Processing & Distribution Center.
    c. Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Processing & Distribution Center.
    d. Church Street Station, New York, Renovation Project, Phase 2.
    e. Advanced Facer Canceler Systems.
    f. Barcode Readers for the Flat Sorting Machine 1000.
8. Briefing on the 1998 Stamp Program.
9. Report on the Pacific Area and Los Angeles Performance Cluster.
10. Tentative Agenda for the January 5-6, 1998, meeting in Washington, 
D.C.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas J. Koerber, Secretary of 
the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.
Thomas J. Koerber,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31597 Filed 11-26-97; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
#### DIXIE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP. v. Louis M. LANDRY et al.

No. 53874.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Louis M. Landry and Landry & Passman Realty, Inc. applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston. 280 So.2d 328.

Writ refused. No error of law in the judgment.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report of NewWestern Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2013 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacitiesand on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

 

 

/s/ Javan Khazali

 

Javan Khazali

President (Principal Executive Officer)

September 26, 2014

 

 

 

/s/ Haris Baha

Haris Baha

Chief Financial Officer

September 26, 2014
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Weikang Bio-Technology Group Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yin Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: December 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Yin WangYin WangChief Executive Officer