alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dorothy P. CAHEE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3602.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1971.

Writ Refused Sept. 28, 1971.

Piccione, Piccione & Wooten by Joseph J. Piccione, Lafayette, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe by J. J. Davidson, III, and L. Lane Roy, Lafayette, for defendants-appellees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

SAVOY, Judge.

Appellant has failed to provide a bond for his devolutive appeal. Appellee has timely filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Plaintiff-appellant first obtained an order for a devolutive appeal in forma pau-peris. Defendant-appellee was given an opportunity to traverse that order upon remand by this court, 247 So.2d 279 (La.App.3rd Cir., 1971).

The trial judge, upon considering the defendant’s rule to traverse, ruled that plain*196tiff could not proceed in forma pauperis and ordered plaintiff to give a bond for his appeal. Plaintiff failed to comply.

Failure to give a bond when required is a fatal defect for an appeal. C.C.P. Article 2087. The appeal must be dismissed.

For the foregoing reasons, the appeal of the plaintiff-appellant is dismissed. Cost is to be paid by the appellant.

Dismissed.
#### Archie Leon SHORT, Appellant, v. Hon. Humes T. LASHER, as Judge of the Court of Record, in and for Broward County, Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-755.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 16, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; John H. Moore, II, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesG. Gidwitz, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and I, Joseph J. Sum, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350, of Chapter63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to our knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.

 

 

November 23,2009

 
|   | By:    | /s/    James  G. Gidwitz |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | James  G. Gidwitz                            |
|   |   | Chairman  of the Board and                   |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer                     |
|   |   |                                         |
|   |   |                                         |
|   | By:    | /s/    Joseph  J. Sum    |
|   |   | Joseph  J. Sum                               |
|   |   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
#### John Lawrence HONCHELL, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40815.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 5, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                            COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      Three Months Ended
                                          March 31,                          Year Ended December 31,
                                     --------------------    --------------------------------------------------------
                                       1997        1996        1996        1995        1994        1993        1992
                                     --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                  <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>     
Interest Expense                     $ 29,600    $ 37,600    $142,100    $151,000    $ 73,300    $ 80,900    $ 92,500
Estimated Interest Portion
  of Rent Expense                       4,815       4,431      17,362      16,865      19,289      20,701      16,178
                                     --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Fixed Charges                        $ 34,415    $ 42,031    $159,462    $167,865    $ 92,589    $101,601    $108,678
                                     ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Income From Continuing
  Operations Before Income Taxes     $125,300    $105,700    $558,000    $478,000    $504,700    $506,000    $392,100
Add:  Fixed Charges                    34,415      42,031     159,462     167,865      92,589     101,601     108,678
      Dividends From Less Than
      50% Owned Companies                  --          --         359         968         835       2,395       2,278
Less: Equity in Earnings
      of Less Than 50% Owned
      Companies                          (412)       (640)     (1,281)     (1,000)     (1,900)     (1,200)     (1,900)
                                     --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Earnings Before Fixed Charges        $159,303    $147,091    $716,540    $645,833    $596,224    $608,796    $501,156
                                     ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges     4.6x        3.5x        4.5x        3.8x        6.4x        6.0x        4.6x
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP96-610-000]


Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.; Notice Rescheduling Oral 
Argument

December 3, 1997.
    On September 24, 1997, the Commission issued an Order Setting 
Proceeding for Oral Argument in the above-docketed proceeding. On 
October 3, 1997, the Commission issued an order suspending the 
scheduled oral argument. By this notice, the oral argument which was 
previously scheduled for October 9, 1997, is rescheduled for Thursday, 
December 18, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. in a hearing room to be designated at 
the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at 888 1st 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32122 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          82,675                   9,007
<SECURITIES>                                    22,199                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,367                  70,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,859                   1,465
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205,379                  80,381
<PP&E>                                          16,678                  10,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,031                   5,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 239,561                 101,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,362                  19,418
<BONDS>                                          1,045                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         3,220                   2,680
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,539                  76,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   239,561                 101,595
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,511                  77,205
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,745                  52,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,767                  17,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,333                      57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,242                   7,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,605                   3,288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,637                   4,536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,637                   4,536
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28                    0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27                    0.16
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I, James G. Gidwitz, certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Continental MaterialsCorporation;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and materials weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 13, 2007 |   |                       |   |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|                  | By:    | /s/ James G. Gidwitz       |   |
|                  |   | James G. Gidwitz           |   |
|                  |   | Chairman of the  Board and |   |
|                  |   | Chief Executive  Officer   |   |
|                  |   |                       |   |

 

----
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. S-6/A


Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


October 26, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 539 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on October 25, 2021, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New
York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-258218) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this
consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 

/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                      


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
Document

EXHIBIT 10.1






Schedule of Key Executive Restoration Plan Participants




Current executive officer


Neil A. Schrimsher
Fred D. Bauer
Warren E. Hoffner
Kurt W. Loring
Jason W. Vasquez
David K. Wells


The Executive Organization & Compensation Committee has set the Company Contribution Percentage for Mr. Schrimsher at 10%.




1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7167

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARC LORENZO SLOAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-92-188-G, CA-96-121-2)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: July 31, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc Lorenzo Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Sloan, Nos. CR-92-188-G, CA-96-121-2 (M.D.N.C. June 5,

1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June

23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Santaro Interactive Entertainment 10-K/A





Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Santaro Interactive Entertainment Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Dong Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated this 2nd day of May, 2011.








/s/ Dong Yan


Dong Yan, Chief Financial Officer
# . ., 

## ..

I

April 8, 2013

Docket Operations M-30 West Building Ground Floor W 12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590;3

United States ofAmerica Department ofTransportation Office ofSecretary Washington DC

It would not be in the best interest ofthe 1 communities being served by Silver Airways in Montana to suspend service to Miles City and Lewistown, Montana at this time.

Ifthis were to happen we feel the whole system ofservice cou71d be in jeopardy forthe rest of the communities being served by Silver Airways.

We as acommunity feel this service must be continued at feastS into the next two year period to give these two communities ample time to make adjustments and forma new plan for increasing ridership. We

### un~erstand that the law was changed and Lewistown and Mile City have not had ample time to address the impeding loss oftheir air carrier. We are sure you can understand the impact to both communities ifthis service is terminated. Once it is gone it may never return. Montana is a large state and distances are very large in the scope ofbeing able to move people to a destination hub. Certainly there needs to be some latitude forthe two communities to work toward a solution totheir existing lack ofboarding's and cost ofthe subsidy per passenger.

. _.., 

# .. '**'"'·<"'~** "'''**~~**.....



## I: I

# I
I 

# I I 

## I I 

# I I 

# I,,

At our task force meeting in Billings on the 4th ofthis month some interesting information was presented to demonstrate when Denver was the hub their boarding's were far greaterthan having Billings as their hub. This should be investigated and a determination needs to be made based on the prior ridership from both communities. We are recommendinc that before you rush to iudcment. that you look at all 

### thefacts 

## thilt may Impact tbese and the otber 

### communities thatwill be 

### Impacted by 

### ellmli'!;rtlng them from the EAS service 

### now beinc provldecl. The dynamics of Montana are changing and the purpose ofthe EAS program was and we hope 

### will continue to be to provide this service to the seven communities in Montana that the system was designed for.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this state wide problem and our hope is that you will not enforce this Order ofShow cause 

### atthis time and give thetask force time to address this problel1). At this time we are confident there 

### is a solution that needs 

### to be worked outbythe communities in Montana and not a Washington solution that is_far removed from the real problems in Montana.

Thank you for consideration and addressing the problem pertinent to Montana. Sincerely, 

### Gla5JOW Arear 

### Community Pete

# PedersOn~ - Dan 

### Corney

# ¢44,~ EAS Task Force**MayorofGI~:"** 

## £) Dave

# Pippin,_~.L..I,. ....

# ~._...:/,:...:4.:l.ofi7J.,_~~~'"'k:::l: ... :::aLarry Mires 

# L7**~.ad'** Task Force 1 

# j I\**~** 

### Paul

# KoskiG?~ 'J<qqJ( Chairman Glasgow Airport Commission Greg Hunter

# ?Z;"'J1..-tl=;;:;;, Glasgow Cham:ofCommerce 

# -

- * -**·-~·** -·. ---- ·--- 

### - ...

### -·-**~** 

## ·---·----- ..
Airworthiness Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20591 DearSir or Madam, Dec-7-2015

As Pilot In Command (PIC), I am responsible for the airworthiness ofthe platform being tested and personallyverify its condition and maintenance as well asthe flight test plans and procedures. In accordancewith MIL-HDBK-516 the 3DR X8 has been reviewed and determined to be airworthyfor operation in Georgia Southern University's aerial data acquisitions. The University has developed internal procedures using various methodsto effectively demonstrate and assertthat the sUAS being considered is airworthy. The sUAS meets the applicable airworthiness standards and requirements ofour University, and is capable ofoperating in compliance with the applicable requirements in 14 CFR Part 91. Sincerely,

# ~~ Joseph Reeves
257 La. 275

#### STATE of Louisiana v. John Ray McELROY.

No. 51054.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 5, 1971.

in re: John Ray McElroy applying for writs of certiorari.

Writ denied. Although error was committed in granting a continuance on an oral motion, applicant is not entitled to the relief prayed for.
EXHIBIT 35.1

World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB

I, Victor A. De Jesus, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in
its capacity as servicer (the Servicer) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2010 (the Agreement), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2010-A, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables
LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period
covered by the issuing entitys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as
of March 15, 2013.



WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.By:

/s/ Victor A. De JesusName: Victor A. De JesusTitle:

Vice President, Finance and Administration / Chief Financial Officer
#### LEHIGH ACRES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. Thelma NORTON et al., Respondents.

No. 40593.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 14, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# 2016 Income by Source