alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Unsolicited R01 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: December 16, 1997.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Teleconference, 6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Building, 
Room 4C01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2550.
    Contact Person: Dr. Dennis Lang, Scientific Review Adm., 6003 
Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C16, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-2550.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate a grant application.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-32087 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 06, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 06, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0044. MARQUISE ALI ROBBINS v. THOMAS A. COX, JR., JUDGE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

08SC73922
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5959-5960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Louisiana Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the

[[Page 5960]]

Louisiana Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on Monday, March 3, 1997, at the Holiday 
Inn Crowne Plaza, 333 Poydras, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130. The 
purpose of the meeting is to plan future projects.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the 
Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, February 3, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-3139 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

California

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within California over 

$671 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Beneficial State Bancorp, PBC Oakland CDFI $ 218,469,000 

Broadway Financial Corporation Los Angeles MDI $ 150,000,000 

Community Bank of the Bay Oakland CDFI $ 119,413,000 

Episcopal Community Federal Credit Union Los Angeles CDFI & MDI $ 38,000 

Financial Partners Credit Union Downey CDFI $ 35,000,000 

MERCO Credit Union Merced CDFI $ 3,500,000 

New Omni Bank, National Association Alhambra MDI $ 39,913,000 

Northeast Community Federal Credit Union San Francisco CDFI & MDI $ 1,500,000 

Orange County's Credit Union Santa Ana CDFI $ 35,000,000 

PCB Bancorp Los Angeles MDI $ 69,141,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000705

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

4F Fund III LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

BRETT C. ARIZUMI, Defendant-Appellant, and

CITIFINANCIAL INC; DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION,

STATE OF HAWAI#I; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; HAWAII LAW

ENFORCEMENT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION FKA HONOLULU POLICE

FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; RENE MATSUURA; ZACHARY KONDO; IVY ROOT;

RADFORD REAL; ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF 3036 KAHALOA

DRIVE, Defendants-Appellees, and

DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC141001769)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of

Appeal with Prejudice, filed March 4, 2021, by Plaintiff-Appellee

4F Fund III LLC, the papers in support, and the record, it

appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties

stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice and bear their own

attorneys' fees and costs; (3) the stipulation is dated and

signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; and

(4) dismissal is authorized by Hawai#i Rules of Appellate

Procedure Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation

for Dismissal of Appeal with Prejudice is approved and the appeal

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000705

08-MAR-2021

09:15 AM

Dkt. 37 OAWST
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own

attorneys' fees and costs.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 8, 2021.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Furiex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marshall H.
Woodworth, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

|                      
|----------------------
|                      
|/s/ Marshall Woodworth
|Marshall Woodworth    

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Assistant Secretary

(principal financial and accounting officer)

March 18, 2011
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Earl CROCKETT.

No. 59946.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Elizabeth W. Cole, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. However, the case is remanded to the Criminal District Court for an evi-dentiary hearing on the issue of whether defendant was represented by counsel, or had voluntarily waived his right to counsel, at the time he pled guilty to simple burglary in 1971, reserving to the trial court the right to modify the enhanced penalty imposed in the instant case should the facts so require. *See State v. Franklin,*337 So.2d *10191152 (La.1976); *State*v. *Brashears,*321 So.2d 330 (La.1975); *State v. Strange,*308 So.2d 795 (La.1975); *City of Monroe v. Coleman,*304 So.2d 332 (La.1974); *State v. Guillotte,*297 So.2d 423 (La.1974).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0665

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

FILED

APR 0 6 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

St:ate nf VInntana

v. ORDER

J.W.K.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant, J.W.K., has filed a petition for rehearing of this Court's March 2, 2021

Memorandum Opinion affirming an order from the Eighteenth Judicial District Court,

Gallatin County, sentencing him to ten years in prison with a five-year parole restriction.

J.W.K. maintains this Court's memorandum opinion conflicts with controlling statutes

or case law because this Court referred to J.W.K.'s statement to the District Court that he did

not intend to present an "affirmative defense" of mental disease or defect. However, the

record reflects that J.W.K. was explaining and acknowledging that he intended to hold the

State to its burden of proof, including proving the mental element of the crime. Pursuant to

§ 46-15-323(3), MCA, "the defendant shall provide the prosecutor with written notice of the

defendant's intention to introduce evidence at trial of the defense that because of a mental

disease or disorder, the defendant did not have a particular state of mind that is an essential

element of the offense charged." The District Court's colloquy with J.W.K. was aimed at

assessing the need for a continuance. As it pertains to J.W.K.'s request for continuance, it is

irrelevant whether J.W.K.'s evidence of mental disease or defect was referred to as an

affirmative defense or a defense.

Under M. R. App. P. 20, this Court will consider a petition for rehearing only if the

opinion "overlooked some fact material to the decision," if the opinion missed a question

provided by a party or counsel that would have decided the case, or if our decision

04/06/2021

Case Number: DA 18-0665
"conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court.

M. R. App. P. 20. Having fully considered Appellant's petition, the Court concludes that

rehearing is not warranted under M. R. App. P. 20.

IT IS TFMREFORE ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties and counsel of

record.

Dated this -L day of April, 2021.

"/"C't°r)7

C h ief Justice

41 r____.,

Justices
EPA VERR #3646, 4136, 4142EPA VERR #3646, 4136, 4142 4142EPA VERR #3646, 4136, 4142EPA VERR #3646, 4136, 4142
LAKE COUNTY EMERGENCYRENTAL ASSISTANCE

CERTIFICACIÓN DE INGRESO CERO

El formulario debe ser completado por el jefe(a) de familia y firmado por todos los miembros adultos del hogar si el 

hogar declara ingresos de cero. 

Jefe(a) de Hogar: Fecha: 

Solicitante: Numero de aplicación: 

(Sólo para uso de oficina) 

* Reconocimiento: Al escribir sus iniciales o su nombre a continuación, reconoce y acepta que esto 

representa su firma y da fe de que toda la información se proporciona en este formulario.

1. Por la presente, certifico / certificamos, que yo / nosotros, no recibimos individualmente ingresos 

de ninguna de las siguientes fuentes: 

a. Salarios del empleo (incluidas comisiones, propinas, bonificaciones, tarifas, etc.); 

b. Ingresos por operación de una empresa; 

c. Ingresos por alquiler de bienes inmuebles o muebles; 

d. Intereses o dividendos de activos; 

e. Pagos del Seguro Social, anualidades, pólizas de seguro, fondos de jubilación, pensiones o 

beneficios por fallecimiento; 

f. Pagos por desempleo o discapacidad; 

g. Pagos de asistencia pública; 

h. Asignaciones periódicas como pensión alimenticia, manutención de menores o obsequios 

recibidos de personas que no viven en mi hogar; 

i. Ventas de recursos de autónomos (Avon, Mary Kay, Shaklee, etc.); 

j. Manutención infantil o pensión alimenticia; 

k. Cualquier otra fuente no mencionada anteriormente.

* Iniciales

2. Actualmente, no tenemos ingresos de ningún tipo y no se espera ningún cambio en mi situación 

económica o laboral durante los próximos 12 mesescurrently.

* Iniciales

___________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ 

Nombre impreso de Solicitante/Inquilino * Firma de Solicitante/Inquilino Fecha

___________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ 

Nombre impreso de Solicitante/Inquilino * Firma de Solicitante/Inquilino Fecha

___________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ 

Nombre impreso de Solicitante/Inquilino * Firma de Solicitante/Inquilino Fecha

___________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ 

Nombre impreso de Solicitante/Inquilino * Firma de Solicitante/Inquilino Fecha
Western Massachusetts Electric CompanyExhibit 12Ratio of Earnings to Fixed ChargesNine Months(In thousands)EndedSeptember 30, 2008Year Ended December 31,Earnings, as defined:(unaudited)20072006200520042003Net income$14,805$23,604$15,644$15,085$12,373$16,212Income tax expense8,13314,5867,7669,2947,18711,687Equity in (earnings)/losses of regional nucleargenerating companies(78)(526)241(311)(149)(473)Dividends received from regional equity investees-7013721036871,715Fixed charges, as below16,43022,16221,08719,80117,15614,920Less: Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)(722)(983)(853)(455)(220)(68)Total earnings, as defined$38,568$59,544$44,257$43,517$37,034$43,993Fixed charges, as defined:Interest on long-term debt (a)$9,964$11,577$10,671$9,535$6,655$3,860Interest on rate reduction bonds3,9225,8396,7237,5708,3328,994Other interest8222,4301,5071,041782965Rental interest factor1,0001,3331,3331,2001,1671,033Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)72298385345522068Total fixed charges, as defined$16,430$22,162$21,087$19,801$17,156$14,920Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges2.352.692.102.202.162.95(a) Interest on long-term debt amounts include amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1739

In Re: HENRY EARL MILLER, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(6:04-cr-00022-HFF-3) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Henry Earl Miller has filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus challenging the district court’s recharacterization of 

a letter as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion. Mandamus is a 

drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances, 

when “the petitioner has no other adequate means to obtain 

relief to which there is a clear and indisputable right.” In re 

Blackwater Sec. Consulting, L.L.C., 460 F.3d 576, 592 (4th Cir. 

2006) (internal quotations and citation omitted), cert. denied, 

127 S. Ct. 1381 (2007). “Courts are extremely reluctant to 

grant a writ of mandamus.” In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th 

Cir. 1987). For the reasons stated by this court in the denial 

of Miller’s prior mandamus petition, In re Miller, 256 F. App’x 

604 (4th Cir. Nov. 30, 2007) (No. 09-1739), he is not eligible 

for mandamus relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We further deny Miller’s motion to recuse. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


 


 


 







BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.


3555 FARNAM STREET


OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68131


Telephone (402) 346-1400












WARREN E. BUFFETT, CHAIRMAN







January 29, 2018







American Express Company


American Express Tower


200 Vesey Street


New York, New York 10285-5170







Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:







I refer to clause 2 of the letter agreement dated February 27, 1995 from me to Harvey Golub, as amended by the letter amendment dated September 8, 2000 from me to American Express Company (as amended, the “Agreement”), in which I agreed that so long as Harvey Golub or Ken Chenault is CEO of American Express, Berkshire shall vote its American Express securities in accordance with the recommendation of the American Express Board. In order to amend the Agreement so that it applies after Stephen Squeri replaces Ken Chenault as CEO, I agree that this clause 2 shall be amended to read as follows:







"So long as Ken Chenault or Stephen Squeri is Chief Executive Officer of American Express, Berkshire shall vote, or cause to be voted, all voting securities of American Express now or hereafter beneficially owned by it at any and all meetings of the shareholders of American Express and any adjournments thereof, or in any written consent solicitation or similar situation in which the voting rights associated with securities of American Express may be exercised, in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors of American Express (if such recommendation is made) with respect to every matter upon which a vote is taken or consent solicited."







Except as amended above, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







Very truly yours,







/s/ Warren E. Buffett


Warren E. Buffett
S:\CHARTS\1Q-REPORT.10.doc May 27, 2010 (3:17 PM)

Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending

January 1 – March 31, 2010

Board Approval Date Country Amount Type U.S. Position

01/27/10 Haiti SDR 65.5 m illion

($102 m illion)

ECF Augmentation Approve

01/29/10 Moldova SDR 369.6 million

($574.4 million)

ECF / EFF Support

02/04/10 Jamaica SDR 820.5 million

($1.27 billion)

SBA Support

02/19/10 Malawi SDR 52.05 million

($79.4 million)

ECF Support
- 2 -

02/19/10 The Gambia SDR 4.67 m illion

($7.1 m illion)

ECF Augmentation Abstain

02/24/10 Iraq SDR 2.38 billion

($3.64 billion)

SBA Approve

03/08/10 Liberia SDR 4.2 m illion

($6.4 m illion)

Additional Interim 

Assistance Under 

Enhanced HIPC

Approve

03/17/10 El Salvador SDR 513.9 million

($790 m illion)

SBA Approve
- 3 -

03/25/10 Mexico SDR 31.528 billion

($48 billion)

Successor FCL Approve

03/31/10 Côte d’Ivoire SDR 5 million

($7.6 m illion)

Additional Interim 

Assistance Under 

Enhanced HIPC

Approve
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 12



                            COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                  (Unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Six Months Ended
                                               June 30,                               Year Ended December 31,
                                        ----------------------    -------------------------------------------------------------
                                           1997         1996         1996        1995         1994         1993          1992
                                        ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                     <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>      
Interest Expense                        $  50,900    $  74,400    $ 142,100    $ 151,000    $  73,300    $  80,900    $  92,500

Estimated Interest Portion
  of Rent Expense                           9,800        9,103       17,362       16,865       19,289       20,701       16,178
                                        ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
Fixed Charges                           $  60,700    $  83,503    $ 159,462    $ 167,865    $  92,589    $ 101,601    $ 108,678
                                        =========    =========    =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

Income From Continuing
  Operations Before Income Taxes        $ 295,500    $ 255,300    $ 558,000    $ 478,000    $ 504,700    $ 506,000    $ 392,100

Add:  Fixed Charges                        60,700       83,503      159,462      167,865       92,589      101,601      108,678

      Dividends From Less Than
      50% Owned Companies                      --           97          359          968          835        2,395        2,278

Less: Equity in Earnings
      of Less Than 50% Owned
      Companies                              (243)        (619)      (1,281)      (1,000)      (1,900)      (1,200)      (1,900)
                                        ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
Earnings Before Fixed Charges           $ 355,957    $ 338,281    $ 716,540    $ 645,833    $ 596,224    $ 608,796    $ 501,156
                                        =========    =========    =========    =========    =========    =========    =========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges           5.9x         4.1x         4.5x         3.8x         6.4x         6.0x         4.6x
</TABLE>