alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### June BRIGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-451.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 14, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1972.

*51Ralph R. Clayton, of Clayton & Clayton, DeLand, and Theodore F. Zentner, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., George R. Georgieff and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction based upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of murder in the second degree. She was sentenced to serve from six months to twenty years, less 125 days for jail time.

The principal question preserved on qppeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. Although the evidence as revealed by this record is conflicting with respect to the mental condition of the appellant at the time this crime was committed, the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given the evidence were questions for decision only by the jury. Without recounting in detail the evidence adduced at the trial, we find in the record substantial competent evidence to support the jury’s conclusion of guilt. This Court has no authority to disturb the findings of the jury in the absence of a clear showing that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusion reached is erroneous. Lee v. State, 153 So.2d 351 (Fla.App.1st, 1963); Fisher v. State, 224 So.2d 415 (Fla.App.1st, 1969).

The judgment appealed herein is accordingly affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and WIGGIN-TON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### Melvyn J. KATZEN, Petitioner, v. Lawrence H. TUCKER, Respondent.

No. 69-988.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 24, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
September 22, 2021

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi

Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Madam Speaker,

For 232 years, our nation has consistently paid all of its bills, in full and on time. Unshakeable 

creditworthiness has long been a wellspring of strength for our nation, and protecting it is a 

sacrosanct responsibility. No Congress or President has allowed our country to default. We 

recognize that in recent years, as our politics have become more polarized and divisive, 

addressing the debt limit has become more contentious and politically fraught. This makes it all 

the more important that Congress and the Administration begin the process to extend the nation’s 

borrowing authority without delay. 

As former Treasury secretaries, we write to express our deep sense of urgency that 

Congressional leadership, working with the Administration and the President, move swiftly to 

initiate and complete a viable legislative process necessary to raise the debt limit.

Failing to address the debt limit, and allowing an unprecedented default, could cause serious 

economic and national security harm. 

Even a short-lived default could threaten economic growth. It creates the risk of roiling markets, 

and of sapping economic confidence, and it would prevent Americans from receiving vital 

services. It would be very damaging to undermine trust in the full faith and credit of the United 

States, and this damage would be hard to repair. 

Short of actual default, even delaying resolution until default is imminent can be detrimental. 

This would be true in any circumstances, but it is particularly true now as the timing of 

borrowing needs are especially uncertain, given the impact of the pandemic and the policy 

actions enacted by Congress in response. An accidental default could occur if the debt limit is 

not raised in time. And there is no viable way to manage payments across the federal government 

to prevent a default if there are insufficient resources available absent action on the debt limit. 

Moreover, postponing action to raise the debt limit until too close to the deadline undermines 

confidence in our political system at home and abroad.

Sincerely,

W. Michael Blumenthal Henry M. Paulson, Jr. 

Robert E. Rubin Timothy F. Geithner
Lawrence H. Summers Jacob J. Lew

Identical letter sent to:

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy, House Republican Leader

The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Majority Leader

The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican Leader

cc: The Honorable Richard E. Neal, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means

The Honorable Kevin Brady, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means

The Honorable Ron Wyden, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance

The Honorable Mike Crapo, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
#### Frances Everett BRANDER, Appellant, v. HOLLOWAY MATERIALS CORPORATION et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1176.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 29, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Tom Kirkland, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
U.S. TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2ND QUARTER 2003

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/27 3/31 4/3 19.00A 16.00A 17.00A 52.92 -0.92

3&6 MONTH BILLS 4/3 4/7 4/10 19.00A 15.00A 16.00A 50.83 -0.83

4/10 4/14 4/17 16.00A 15.00A 15.00A 57.89 -11.89

4/17 4/21 4/24 13.00A 15.00A 16.00A 55.53 -11.53

4/24 4/28 5/1 11.00A 15.00A 16.00A 53.65 -11.65

5/1 5/5 5/8 18.00 18.00 16.00 55.00 -3.00

5/8 5/12 5/15 18.00 18.00 16.00 50.00 3.00

5/15 5/19 5/22 18.00 18.00 16.00 45.00 8.00

5/22 5/26 5/29 18.00 18.00 17.00 44.00 9.00

5/29 6/2 6/5 18.00 18.00 17.00 50.00 3.00

6/5 6/9 6/12 18.00 18.00 17.00 50.00 3.00

6/12 6/16 6/19 18.00 18.00 17.00 51.00 2.00

6/19 6/23 6/26 18.00 18.00 17.00 51.00 2.00

655.00 666.83 -9.83

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

12-Day Bill 3/31 4/1 4/3 20.00A 20.00 0.00

 Matures 4/15

6-Day Bill 4/3 4/8 4/9 8.00A 8.00 0.00

Matures 4/15

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

2-Year Note 4/21 4/23 4/30 27.00 18.62 8.38

3-Year Note 4/30 5/6 5/15 20.00

5-Year Note 4/30 5/7 5/15 20.00

10-Year Note 4/30 5/8 5/15 18.00 2.27 53.73

2-Year Note 5/26 5/28 6/2 27.00 20.44 6.56

5-Year Note (R) 6/9 6/11 6/16 14.00 0.00 14.00

2-Year Note 6/23 6/25 6/30 27.00 21.10 5.90

153.00 62.43 88.57

R = Reopening NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 78.74

A = Announced

Treasury announced a 

Q2 borrowing need of 

$79 billion on 4/28/03.
#### Johnny Lee WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-465.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 21, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged with breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit a felony. At the close of the state’s case the appellant moved the court to reduce the charge to breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit a misdemeanor. The court granted the motion. Thereafter the jury found the appellant guilty of breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit a misdemeanor.

*139The sole question on appeal is whether it was harmful error for the court to refuse appellant’s request, made during the charge conference, for the court to instruct the jury that it might find appellant guilty of an attempt to break and enter a dwelling with intent to commit a misdemeanor. The court based its refusal to give the requested instruction on attempt on the ground that the evidence showed appellant either broke and entered or entered without breaking or did nothing, since the defense appellant relied on was alibi. Under the evidence in this case one can not argue with the trial judge’s logic that appellant either broke and entered, entered without breaking, or did nothing. However, logical or not, the mandate contained in Rule 3.510, FRCrP, 33 F.S.A., is that the court must charge on an attempt to commit a crime if such attempt is also an offense. Anomalous as it seems, it makes no difference that the proof established the greater crime charged, Brown v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 377, Lewis v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 269 So.2d 692, or that failure to reach fruition is of the essence of an attempt to commit a crime. So until the rule is changed by the court of last resort, like it or not, we are all obliged to follow it.

Next we consider whether the harmless error statute, § 924.33, F.S.1971, F.S.A., is applicable here. The main charge upon which the case went to the jury was breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit a misdemeanor, a third-degree felony. See § 810.05 F.S. 1971, F.S.A. Section 776.04, F.S.1971, F. S.A., provides that whoever attempts to commit an offense prohibited by law, which offense is a third-degree felony, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Thus, if the jury had been properly instructed on attempts, it could have found appellant guilty of a misdemeanor. Without such an instruction the jury was not afforded that opportunity, and it can hardly be said such an omission, from appellant’s standpoint, is harmless. Although there was ample evidence upon which the jury could properly have returned the verdict it did return, in view of the fo.regoing observations, and after an examination of the appeal papers, we conclude the error was harmful. Cf. Birge v. State, Fla.1957, 92 So.2d 819.

The judgment and sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65686-65687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; 
Education.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the National Educational Research Policy and 
Priorities Board. This notice also describes the functions of the 
Board. Notice of this meeting is required under Section 10(a)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act. This document is intended to notify the 
public of their opportunity to attend the meeting.

DATE: January 15 and 16, 1998.

TIME: January 15, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; January 16, 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 
p.m.

LOCATION: Room 100, 80 F St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20208-7564.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thelma Leenhouts, Designated Federal Official, National Educational 
Research Policy and Priorities Board, 80 F St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20208-7564. Telephone: (202) 219-2065; fax: (202) 219-1528; e-mail: 
Thelma__ L<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6005050e080f1514132005044e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85e0e0ebedeaf0f1f6c5e0e1abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>. The main telephone number for the Board is 
(202) 208-0692.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Educational Research Policy and 
Priorities Board is authorized by Section 921 of the Educational 
Research, Development, Dissemination, and Improvement Act of 1994. The 
Board works collaboratively with the Assistant Secretary for the Office 
of Educational Research and Improvement to forge a national consensus 
with respect to a long-term agenda for educational research, 
development, and dissemination, and to provide advice and assistance to 
the Assistant Secretary in administering the duties of the Office.
    The January meeting will be the Board's quarterly meeting, 
consisting of three sessions led by committee chairs, followed by a 
business session. On Thursday, January 15, the Board will hear reports 
from the Peer Review and Standards Committee and from the Program 
Committee. On Friday, January 16, the Board will hear a report from the 
Research, Development, and Dissemination Committee. The business 
meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. A final agenda will be available from 
the Board's office on January 7. Records are kept of all Board 
proceedings and are available for public inspection at the office of 
the National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board, 80 F 
St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20208-7564.


[[Page 65687]]


    Dated: December 9, 1997.
Eve M. Bither,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-32598 Filed 12-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit10.148**

**FIRST AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

**DIRECTOR EMERITUS PROGRAM**

**ThisFirst Amendment to the Director Emeritus Program (the “Program”) dated as of June13, 2007 is made by Countrywide Financial Corporation (the “Company”).**

**WHEREAS,at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) duly heldon February 11, 1987, the Board adopted resolutions authorizing the creation ofa Director Emeritus position for directors of the Company who no longer serveas active members of the Board and thereby established the Program; and**

WHEREAS,the Company wishes to amend the Program to limit participation in the Programto current participants.

NOW,THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Program as follows:

1.                                       TheCompany hereby limits participation in the Program to the current participantsand eliminates the eligibility of future Directors to participate in theProgram, as of the date of this First Amendment; and

2.                                       Theclosure of the Program shall have no affect on the benefits extended to theexisting Directors with emeritus status under the Program and pursuant to theirindividual Director Emeritus Agreements.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this FirstAmendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.
|   | COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |                              |
|   |                              |
|   | By:                               | /s/ Marshall M. Gates |   |
|   |                              | Marshall M. Gates |
|   |                              | Senior Managing Director, Chief Administrative |
|   |                              | Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65067-65068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32342]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology


Announcement of an Opportunity to Join a Cooperative Research and 
Development Consortium for CD-Metrology Below 0.25 Microns

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Standards and Technology invites 
interested parties to attend a meeting on January 9, 1998, to discuss 
setting up a cooperative research consortium. The goal of the 
consortium is to achieve commercially available reference standards to 
support CD-metrology for feature linewidths below 0.25 microns. Parties 
participating in the consortium will be loaned (110) and (100) BESO1 
chips and asked to perform a selection of CD measurements.

DATES: The Meeting will take place at 10 a.m. on January 9, 1998. 
Interested parties should contact NIST to confirm their interest at the 
address, telephone number or FAX number shown below.


[[Page 65068]]


ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at and inquiries should be sent 
to Room B360, Building 225, National Institute of Standards and 
Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael W. Cresswell, Telephone: 301-
975-2072; FAX: 301-948-4081.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The program will be within the scope and 
confines of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
502, 15 U.S.C. 371Oa), which provides federal laboratories including 
NIST, with the authority to enter into cooperative research agreements 
with qualified parties. Under this law, NIST may contribute personnel, 
equipment, and facilties--but no funds--to the cooperative research 
program.
    Members will be expected to make a contribution to the consortium's 
efforts in the form of personnel, data, and/or funds. This is not a 
grant program.
    NIST and Sandia National Laboratories have successfully fabricated 
and tested prototypes of a new class of reference materials to support 
CD-metrology below 0.25 m. This work has the long-term goal of the 
commercial availability of certified physical standards traceable to 
NIST. As a result of the multiple requests for sample prototypes for 
evaluative purposes that it received, NIST formed an industry 
consortium to maximize the benefits of exchanging independent 
measurement results. That previous consortium ended in July 1997. The 
proposed consortium will last through July 1998.

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
Elaine Bunten-Mines,
Director, Program Office.
[FR Doc. 97-32342 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7473

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANDRE FERNE SAINT-JEAN, a/k/a Dre,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (5:06-cr-00038-gec-mfu-7)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Ferne Saint-Jean, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph W. H. Mott, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Andre Ferne Saint-Jean seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on February 17, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on October 

12, 2010.∗

 ∗ For the purposes of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).

Because Saint-Jean failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 
3

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Oct - Dec

2007 Actual 91 87 (14) 73 (18) 57

Jan - Mar

2008 Actual 187 191 (15) 176 (11) 46

Apr - Jun

2008 Actual (74) (45) (22) (66) 7 53

Jul - Sep

2008 Actual 179 527 (30) 497 318 372

Oct - Dec

2008 Actual 556 569 (18) 551 (5) 367

Jan - Mar

2009 Actual 565 481 (14) 467 (98) 269

Apr - Jun

2009 Actual 278 343 (17) 327 49 318

Jul - Sep

2009 Actual 415 393 (20) 372 (43) 275

Oct - Dec

2009 Actual 340 260 (3) 258 (82) 194

Jan - Mar

2010 Actual 446 483 (12) 471 25 219

Apr - Jun

2010 Actual 263 344 (10) 334 71 290

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing

Jul - Sep

2010 Actual 362 396 (14) 382 20 310

Oct - Dec

2010 Actual 326 363 (4) 359 33 343

Jan - Mar 100

2011 Actual 470 265 (20) 245 (225) 118

Apr - Jun May 1, 2011 151 142 (14) 128 (23) 95

2011 Actual 149 190 (22) 167 19 137

Memo: Forecast Revision (3) 47 (8) 39 42 42

Jul - Sep May 1, 2011 366 405 (20) 386 20 115

2011 August 1, 2011 331 331 (26) 304 (27) 110

Memo: Forecast Revision (34) (74) (7) (81) (47) (5)

Oct - Dec

2011 August 1, 2011 282 285 (12) 272 (10) 100
5/4/2023 5/5/2023 5/8/2023 5/9/2023 5/10/2023

Treasury Bills Net 39,958 -10 -11 -16,992 -6

Treasury Notes Net 0 0 0 0 0

Treasury Bonds Net 0 0 0 0 0

Marketable Inflation Compensation 0 0 0 0 0

Marketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment 201 201 603 199 202

Total Marketable Activity 40,159 190 592 -16,793 197

Airport and Airway Trust Fund 0 0 747 0 1,640

Civil Service Retirement and Disability Trust Fund 0 0 0 0 0

Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund 2 3 43 -15 0

Department of Defense Medicare Eligible Retiree Fund -9 -56 -110 -25 -23

Employees' Health Benefits Fund -27 -142 -174 -724 -437

Employees' Life Trust Fund -6 -14 -11 -2 -1

Exchange Stabilization Fund 2 2 8 3 3

Deposit Insurance Fund -9,999 -1,999 -1 -1 -1

Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund 780 177 353 1,021 -1,490

FHA, Mutual Mortgage Insurance Capital Reserve Account, HUD 185 0 9 0 0

Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund 718 944 151 1,405 -553

Federal Old-Age And Survivors Insurance Trust Fund 4,535 1,035 2,268 6,253 -25,728

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund -791 -662 888 -656 6,147

Foreign Service Retirement And Disability Fund 18 0 0 0 0

Highway Trust Fund 15 -784 1,712 19 -1,239

National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund 1 0 0 2 0

Deposits, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Bonus Bids, MMS 0 0 0 0 0

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 1 0 2 3 -3

Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund 0 0 0 0 0

Postal Service Fund 210 168 258 287 164

Railroad Retirement Account 3 2 23 44 2

Thrift Savings Fund -37,349 -2,860 -9,310 9,339 18,134

Unemployment Trust Fund 2,985 2,588 457 288 -40

Nonmarketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment 144 144 433 143 146

Nonmarketable Inflation Compensation 0 0 0 0 0

All Other Trust Funds 51 800 147 76 -346

Total Government Account Series (Net) -38,529 -654 -2,106 17,461 -3,624

Certificates of Indebtedness -33 -4 -6 32 -4

Discount Adjustment -1,805 517 1,551 -716 518

Domestic Series 1 1 4 1 1

Foreign Series 0 0 0 0 0

State and Local Government Series 268 0 9 78 2,960

Tax and Loss Bonds 0 0 0 0 0

United States Savings Bonds -61 -51 -43 -62 -47

Total Non-Marketable Activity (Net) -40,159 -190 -592 16,793 -197

Daily Public Debt Activity 0 0 0 0 0

Total Public Debt Subject to Limit 31,381,438 31,381,438 31,381,438 31,381,438 31,381,438

Daily Extraordinary Measures 

Investments Suspended (-)/Reinvested (+) -37,377 -2,763 -9,131 8,854 18,166

Daily Debt Subject to Limit Activity 

($ millions)
Date

Impacted

Funds

Measures 

Authorized

Measures 

Used

Measures 

Remaining

CSRDF/PSRHBF 1/ 21 (21) 0

G Fund 295 (223) 72

ESF 17 0 17

Totals* 333 (244) 88

1/ Includes Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, and Postal 

Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. Assumes Debt Issuance Suspension 

Period (DISP) ends on June 5, 2023. Measures authorized includes the 

value of early redemptions, which will decrease by roughly $4 billion on 

June 1, 2023.

DEBT SUBJECT TO LIMIT 

EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES

($ billions)

5/10/2023

*Differences may occur due to rounding.