alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

I, Thos. E. Capps, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Natural Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 5(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 4, 2005
 
 
      /s/ Thos. E. Capps
#### Charlie SITTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-113.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 30, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 2, 1973.

Harry W. Fogle, of Fogle & Wilson, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been orally argued before this Court and the briefs and records on appeal have been read and given full consideration. Appellant has alleged seventeen assignments of error and condensed the same in his brief into nine questions on appeal. We think the trial court correctly exercised his discretion on the questions of consolidation of the cases, as well as the refusal of severance. The other questions of law raised were properly supported by ample authority. The evidence also amply supported verdicts of the jury, and we will *26not interfere with the judgments and sentences, as same are properly within the trial court’s prerogative.

The judgment and conviction and the denial of motion for new trial are hereby affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.3.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
John D. McMahon, the Chief Executive Officer of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  | /s/JOHN D. MCMAHONJohn D. McMahon
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2003 |  |                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2014

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 6/26 6/30 7/3 30.00 24.00 22.00 80.00 -4.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 7/3 7/7 7/10 35.00 24.00 22.00 81.00 0.00

7/10 7/14 7/17 40.00 24.00 22.00 81.00 5.00

7/17 7/21 7/24 40.00 24.00 22.00 25.00 105.00 6.00

7/24 7/28 7/31 45.00 24.00 22.00 75.00 16.00

7/31 8/4 8/7 45.00 24.00 22.00 79.00 12.00

8/7 8/11 8/14 50.00 24.00 22.00 106.00 -10.00

8/14 8/18 8/21 50.00 24.00 22.00 25.00 119.00 2.00

8/21 8/25 8/28 40.00 24.00 22.00 94.00 -8.00

8/28 9/2 9/4 39.00 24.00 22.00 94.00 -9.00

9/4 9/8 9/11 39.00 24.00 22.00 97.00 -12.00

9/11 9/15 9/18 39.00 24.00 22.00 25.00 119.00 -9.00

9/18 9/22 9/25 38.00 24.00 22.00 87.00 -3.00

1203.00 1217.00 -14.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

21-DAY BILL 8/7 8/12 8/14 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 9/4/14

14-DAY BILL 8/25 8/26 8/28 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 9/11/14

11-DAY BILL 9/2 9/3 9/4 40.00 40.00 0.00

Matures 9/15/14

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 7/3 7/8 7/15 27.00 -1.00

10-year Note ® 7/3 7/9 7/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 7/3 7/10 7/15 13.00 0.00 55.58 5.42

10-year TIPS 7/17 7/24 7/31 15.00 0.00

2-year note 7/24 7/29 7/31 29.00 -1.00

5-year note 7/24 7/30 7/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 7/24 7/30 7/31 29.00 0.00

2-year FRN 7/24 7/29 7/31 15.00 0.00 74.98 48.02

3-year Note 8/6 8/12 8/15 26.00 -1.00

10-year Note 8/6 8/13 8/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 8/6 8/14 8/15 16.00 0.00 57.70 8.30

5-year TIPS ® 8/14 8/21 8/29 16.00 0.00

2-year FRN® 8/21 8/27 8/29 13.00 0.00 0.00 29.00

2-year note 8/21 8/26 9/2 28.00 -1.00

5-year note 8/21 8/27 9/2 35.00 0.00

7-year note 8/21 8/28 9/2 29.00 0.00 75.17 16.83

3-year Note 9/3 9/9 9/15 26.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 9/3 9/10 9/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 9/3 9/11 9/15 13.00 0.00 32.00 28.00

2-year FRN® 9/18 9/24 9/26 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

10-year TIPS ® 9/11 9/18 9/30 13.00 0.00

2-year note 9/18 9/23 9/30 28.00 0.00

5-year note 9/18 9/24 9/30 35.00 0.00

7-year note 9/18 9/25 9/30 29.00 0.00 75.71 29.29

549.00 371.13 177.87

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 164
United States Position 

Proposed IFC Investment in OCL India Limited II 

December 20, 2012 

The United States appreciates the substantial development impacts expected under the IFC’s 

investment in OCL India Limited II and the strong alignment of this investment with the Bank 

Group’s Country Assistance Strategy for India. In particular, the significant amount of job 

creation under this investment, particularly in the unskilled segment of the workforce, is well 

aligned with the CAS’ inclusive growth pillar. The substitution of blast furnace slag for clinker 

and the large net reductions in CO2 emissions due to this innovation are well aligned with the 

CAS’ pillar on climate change. And the expected supply linkages for local small and mediumsized enterprises will have an important potential impact. Nonetheless, in accordance with U.S. 

legislative mandates, the United States wishes to be recorded as abstaining on this guarantee 

given that the ESIA was only made publicly available on October 20, 2012, less than 120 days 

prior to Board discussion.
STATE OF MAINE 

### D EPARTMENT OF 

### E NVIRONMENTAL 

### P ROTECTION

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI DAVID P. LITTELL

GOVERNOR COMMISSIONER

AUGUSTA

17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK (207) 287-7688 FAX: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, ME 04401 PORTLAND, ME 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, ME 04769-2094 RAY BLDG., 28 TYSON DR. (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 764-1507

web site: www.maine.gov/dep printed on recycled paper March 13, 2009

Mr. Roy Koster Central Maine Power Company

83 Edison Drive Augusta, Maine 04336

Re: O’Connor Superfund Site Easement Request-Greater Augusta Utility District

Dear Mr. Koster:

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) has reviewed the March 2, 2009 letter from Central Maine Power Company (CMP) regarding the request from the Greater Augusta Utility District for a 30 foot easement along Route 17 through the O’Connor Superfund Site for the purpose of installing a sewer main. MEDEP has reviewed this letter in accordance with the September 13, 2002 Restrictive

Covenant for the O’Connor Site.

DEP suggests that CMP strongly encourage the Greater Augusta Utility District to route the sewer line on the other side of Route 17 to avoid the issues associated with a Superfund Site and the potential for impacting the remedy. If re-routing the sewer ling is truly not feasible, the following information and conditions will need to be provided and agreed to in writing before MEDEP can provide approval of the activity:

• Start work notification to CMP, EPA, and MEDEP project managers;

• Prevention of infringement into the Designated Area, particularly PTA, with equipment, soil disturbance or spoils;

• Remedial measures to be taken, if blasting of bedrock is necessary, to prevent disturbance of the remedial components (i.e., riprap, lagoons, etc.);

• Analyses and disposal of spoils;

• A contingency plan to notify CMP, MEDEP and EPA if during the installation if any unexpected situation occur (i.e., buried debris, odors, oily material etc);

• And identification of who is responsible for any repairs to the remedial components. (MEDEP suggests that a pre and post work video be taken of the site as visual documentation.)

### 2

If blasting is necessary it may be necessary to perform an extra monitoring event to ensure that it did not impact the equilibrium of the groundwater contamination.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any comments or want to discuss this in more detail please call me at (207) 287-7713 or email me at claudia.b.sait@maine.gov

Respectfully,

Claudia Sait Project Manager Bureau of Remediation & Waste Management

Cf: File

Ted Wolfe-MEDEP Terrence Connelly-EPA
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAVID STEPHEN REIDY
, Petitioner

,

v.

LIUDMYLA Y. REIDY
, Respondent

.

No. 4D 18

- 2525

[ November 28, 2018 ]

Petition for writ of prohibition to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrea Ruth Gundersen , Judge; L.T.

Case No. FMCE 14

- 006256

.

Carla P. Lowry of Lowry a t Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner

.

Richard F. Hussey of Richard F. Hussey, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Petit ioner seeks prohibition to quash an order of the trial court which determined that an attorney timely and properly perfected his charging lien in a dissolution of marriage action. We grant the petition and quash the order upon concluding that the trial co urt lacks jurisdiction to

entertain the lien.

The attorney represented the former wife in a dissolution action. He was replaced after the trial court entered a final dissolution judgment and while the direct appeal of that judgment was pending. He then filed a notice of intention to impose and enforce a chargin g lien. The trial court issued a post

- dissolution support and fee order, and that led to a second appeal. Once that appeal was resolved, counsel moved to adjudicate and impose his charging lien for work performed prior to the entry of the original final judgment. The trial court determined that it was timely. We grant relief for two reasons.

First, the attorney failed to file the notice of charging lien before the trial court issued the final judgment. Brody v. Broward Cty. Sheriff ’ s2 Office , 137 So. 3d 610, 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“A trial court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a charging lien where it has not been timely perfected; that is, filed before the trial court lost jurisdiction through settlement, dismissal or final judgment.”). S econd, the judgment denied both parties’ fee requests and therefore did not reserve jurisdiction to adjudicate fees. Compare Weiland v. Weiland, 814 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) with Lutz v. Rutherford , 139 So. 3d 501 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014),

and Baker & Hos tetler, LLP v. Swearingen , 998 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition and quash the

trial court ’ s order which determined counsel’s charging lien was timely and properly perfected.

G ROSS

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### FRESS, INC., a Florida corporation, and Fred A. Chastain, Appellants, v. A. GAUDIO & SONS, INC., an Ohio corporation, and John James Parise, Appellees.

No. 73-333.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

SERGIO ALFONSO PIEDRA-CASTRO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10346

D.C. No. 4:06-cr-01681-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Sergio Alfonso Piedra-Castro appeals from the 85-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted re-entry after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

FILED

MAR 14 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10346

Piedra-Castro contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable

because the district court failed to reduce his sentence to account for: (1) the

youthfulness and remoteness of his prior enhancing conviction, and (2) the alleged

ongoing punishment and deterrent effects from the injury he sustained when

apprehended by United States Border Patrol agents.

The record reflects that the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable in

light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v.

Valencia-Barragan, 608 F. 3d 1103, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2010).

To the extent Piedra-Castro contends that the district court failed to consider

or make required factual findings regarding his injuries and the circumstances

surrounding those injuries, these contentions are not supported by the record.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 216 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 216

 To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude Frazier Mountain, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2021

  Ms. Titus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude Frazier Mountain, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MAUDE FRAZIER MOUNTAIN IN THE STATE OF 
              NEVADA.

    (a) In General.--The peak of Frenchman Mountain located at latitude 
3610'45" N, by longitude 11459'52" W in the State of Nevada shall be 
known and designated as ``Maude Frazier Mountain''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to the peak referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to ``Maude Frazier 
Mountain''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15.2








Scorpio Tankers Inc.


9, Boulevard Charles III


Monaco 98000





March 16, 2017





Dear Sir/Madam:





Reference is made to the annual report on Form 20-F of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Annual Report”) and the registration statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. Registration No. 333-210284) of the Company, as may be amended, including the prospectus contained therein and any prospectus supplement related thereto (the “Registration Statement”).  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of all references to our name in the Annual Report and to the use of the statistical information supplied by us set forth in the Annual Report. We further advise the Company that our role has been limited to the provision of such statistical data supplied by us. With respect to such statistical data, we advise you that:





(1) we have accurately described the information and data of the oil tanker shipping industry, subject to the availability and reliability of the data supporting the statistical and graphical information presented; and





(2) our methodologies for collecting information and data may differ from those of other sources and does not reflect all or even necessarily a comprehensive set of the actual transactions occurring in the oil tanker shipping industry.





We hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement and any related prospectus.








Yours faithfully,














Nigel Gardiner


Group Managing Director


Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd.








LONDON | DELHI | SINGAPORE | SHANGHAI


Drewry Shipping Consultants, 15-17 Christopher Street, London EC2A 2BS, United Kingdom


t: +44 (0) 20 7538 0191 f: +44 (0) 20 7987 9396 e: enquiries@drewry.co.uk


Registered in England No. 3289135 Registered VAT No. 830 3017 77


www.drewry.co.uk
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of PhotoAmigo, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I, Robert Heckes, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


Dated: January 27, 2011
By:
/s/ Robert HeckesRobert Heckes

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
 Dated: January 27, 2011
By:
/s/ Robert HeckesRobert Heckes

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer
ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                               Twelve Months Ended
                             (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                      JUNE             JUNE
                                                                      2000             1999
                                                                 --------------    -------------

<S>                                                               <C>            <C>

Earnings

        Net Income                                                $38,279           $18,577
        Federal Income Tax                                         45,008            15,142
        State Income Tax                                            1,599             2,112
                                                                  ----------      ----------

        Total Earnings Before Federal and State Income Tax         84,886            35,831

Fixed Charges*                                                     30,001            37,305
                                                                  ----------      ----------
                    Total Earnings Before Federal and State
                       Income Tax and Fixed Charges               $114,887          $73,136
                                                                   ==========     ==========



        * Fixed Charges

        Interest on Long-Term Debt                                 $24,637         $24,709
        Amortization of Debt Discount, Premium and Expense           1,166           1,170
        Interest Component on lease Payment                          1,595           2,517
        Other Interest                                               2,603           8,909
                                                                  ----------      ----------

                    Total Fixed Charges                            $30,001         $37,305
                                                                   ==========     ==========



        Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                           3.83            1.96


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ES-960-1910-00-4442] ES-048576, Group 158, Minnesota


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Minnesota, Stay Lifted

    On Thursday, March 20, 1997, there was published in the Federal 
Register, Volume 62, Number 54, on page 13393, a notice entitled, 
``Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Minnesota, Stayed.'' Said notice 
referenced the stay of the plat of the dependent resurvey of portions 
of the west and north boundaries, a portion of the subdivisional lines, 
and the subdivision of sections 6, 7, 8, 9, 16 and 33, Township 145 
North, Range 38 West, Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota, accepted 
January 23, 1997.
    The protest against the survey was withdrawn on September 3, 1997, 
and the plat of survey accepted January 23, 1997, was officially filed 
in Eastern States Office, Springfield, Virginia, at 7:30 a.m., on 
September 4, 1997.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 97-31852 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P