DRAFT ‐ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Test Data Selected for MACT Floor Analysis

(Single highest CO concentration selected for each engine test)

Test Facility Test Date Engine Number Engine Size (HP) Test Method Used

Average CO

Concentration

(ppmvd @ 15% O2)

Average Form

Concentration

(ppbvd @ 15% O2) 

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 1/22/2009 West Crane 1 160 CARB 100 222.9

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 1/22/2009 East Crane 3 160 CARB 100 479.8

Air Pollution Testing Test Report 5/8/2009 Water Pump 177 WY Portable Monitoring Protocol 156.9 One 21‐minute s

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 1/20/2009 East Crane 1 450 CARB 100 129.6

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 1/21/2009 East Crane 2 450 CARB 100 154.4

Air Pollution Testing Test Report 5/8/2009 Generator 1C 535 WY Portable Monitoring Protocol 149.3 One 21‐minute s

Precision Power 7/26/2005 Engine 4 550 EPA Method 10 28.9 100% load

Precision Power 7/27/2005 Engine 1 550 EPA Method 10 45.6 100% load

Precision Power 7/28/2005 Engine 3 550 EPA Method 10 82.8 25% load, Arctic 

Precision Power 7/29/2005 Engine 2 550 EPA Method 10 90.9 25% loadCSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 9/2/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 76.8 1400 70% load

Badami Development Facility 6/26/2003 Generator 2 1680 EPA Method 10 327.1 75% load

Northstar Development Project ‐ BP 7/8/2004 Engine 6 3570 EPA Method 10 69.4 Low load

Northstar Development Project ‐ BP 7/9/2004 Engine 7 3570 EPA Method 10 142.9 Mid load

Draft Floor (< 300 HP)

Notes: The highest CO concentration was selected for the above the floor option for 300‐500 HP engines. Count 3

The CSU data point was selected for > 500 HP engines because it represents the highest CO concentration Top 12% 1

of tests that were performed at various loads. Ave of Top 12% 157 ppm @15 %O2

Draft Floor (300‐500 HP)Count 2Top 12% 1Ave of Top 12% 130 ppm @15 %O2Draft Floor (> 500 HP)Count 9Top 12% 2Ave of Top 12% 37 ppm @15 %O2Above the Floor (300‐500 HP)Data Point Used 154.4 ppm @15 %O2CO reduction 70 %

Above the Floor Stan 46 ppm @15 %O2

Above the Floor (> 500 HP)Data Point Used 76.8 ppm @15 %O2CO reduction 70 %

Above the Floor Stan 23 ppm @15 %O2
DRAFT ‐ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

All CI Test Data

Test Facility Test Date Engine Number Engine Size (HP) Test Method Used

Average CO

Concentration

(ppmvd @ 15% O2)

Average Form

Concentration

(ppbvd @ 15% O2) 

Air Pollution Testing Test Report 5/8/2009 Generator 1C 535 WY Portable Monitoring Protocol 149.3 One 21‐minute s

Air Pollution Testing Test Report 5/8/2009 Water Pump 177 WY Portable Monitoring Protocol 156.9 One 21‐minute s

Badami Development Facility 6/26/2003 Generator 2 1680 EPA Method 10 327.1 75% load

Badami Development Facility 6/26/2003 Generator 2 1680 EPA Method 10 265.4 100% load

Badami Development Facility 6/26/2003 Generator 2 1680 EPA Method 10 196.9 50% load

Badami Development Facility 6/25/2003 Generator 2 1680 EPA Method 10 77.7 25% load

CSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 9/2/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 76.8 1400 70% load

CSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 9/1/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 44.1 1500 70% load

CSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 8/31/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 43.5 1600 100% load

CSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 8/31/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 41.6 1400 100% loadCSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 9/1/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 42.7 1600 100% load

CSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 8/31/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 45.2 1600 100% load

CSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 8/31/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 44.1 1500 100% loadCSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 9/1/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 41.6 1400 100% load

CSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 9/1/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 76.2 1600 70% load

CSU‐Engines & Energy Conversion Laboratory 8/31/1999 Caterpillar 3508 1000 EPA Method 10 39.8 1300 100% load

Northstar Development Project ‐ BP 7/8/2004 Engine 6 3570 EPA Method 10 69.4 Low load

Northstar Development Project ‐ BP 7/8/2004 Engine 6 3570 EPA Method 10 54.9 High load

Northstar Development Project ‐ BP 7/9/2004 Engine 6 3570 EPA Method 10 55.5 Mid load

Northstar Development Project ‐ BP 7/9/2004 Engine 7 3570 EPA Method 10 142.9 Mid loadNorthstar Development Project ‐ BP 7/9/2004 Engine 7 3570 EPA Method 10 131.1 High load

Northstar Development Project ‐ BP 7/9/2004 Engine 7 3570 EPA Method 10 127.8 Low load

Precision Power 7/27/2005 Engine 1 550 EPA Method 10 45.6 100% load

Precision Power 7/29/2005 Engine 2 550 EPA Method 10 90.9 25% loadPrecision Power 7/29/2005 Engine 2 550 EPA Method 10 57.7 50% loadPrecision Power 7/29/2005 Engine 2 550 EPA Method 10 41.6 75% loadPrecision Power 7/27/2005 Engine 2 550 EPA Method 10 23.5 100% load

Precision Power 7/28/2005 Engine 3 550 EPA Method 10 82.8 25% load, Arctic Precision Power 7/28/2005 Engine 3 550 EPA Method 10 59.9 50% load, Arctic Precision Power 7/28/2005 Engine 3 550 EPA Method 10 39.5 75% load, Arctic 

Precision Power 7/28/2005 Engine 3 550 EPA Method 10 42.8 100% load, Arcti

Precision Power 7/26/2005 Engine 3 550 EPA Method 10 42.3 100% load

Precision Power 7/26/2005 Engine 4 550 EPA Method 10 28.9 100% load

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 1/20/2009 East Crane 1 450 CARB 100 129.6

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 1/21/2009 East Crane 2 450 CARB 100 154.4

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 1/22/2009 East Crane 3 160 CARB 100 479.8

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District 1/22/2009 West Crane 1 160 CARB 100 222.9