alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Michael R. Coltrane, President and Chief Executive Officer of CTCommunications, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CT Communications,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
     (b) [Intentionally omitted]
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: April 27, 2005     By: /s/ Michael R. Coltrane      Michael R. Coltrane   President and Chief Executive Officer
#### James Edward NAPIER v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49914.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 24, 1977.

Fledell Chain, Collins, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Covington County; George B. Grubbs, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
# GVG ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

Re: Docket No. FAA-2015-3292 Additional information.
Dear Sir or Madam: The additional information has been requested in regard to the petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-3292) as follows:“Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighterthan-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).” Please find below the information from the UAS user manual: 1. Manufacturer is DJI
. 2. Model is Phantom 2 Vision + 3. Type. It is a battery powered multi-rotor quadcopter
. 4. Type of supported battery is DJI 5200 mAh Li-Po battery
. 5. Weight (battery and propellers included) is 1,242.0 grams. No additional payload.
P.S. The copy of the above information has been also emailed to 333exemptions@faa.gov as requested. Sincerely, Greg V. Gladov, PE, LEED AP BD+C

TEL 314 246-0422 EMAIL GGLADOV@GMAIL.COM 

### phone (314) 246-0422

GGLADOV@GMAIL.COM

October 20, 2015 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of STR Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to my
knowledge:



Date: March 11, 2011

/s/ DENNIS L. JILOTName:

Dennis L. JilotTitle:

Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, December 10, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered:

    Summary Agenda: Because of its routine nature, no discussion of the 
following item is anticipated. The matter will be voted on without 
discussion unless a member of the Board requests that the item be moved 
to the discussion agenda.
    1. Cost of Federal Reserve Bank notes in 1998.

Discussion Agenda:

    2. Proposed 1998 Federal Reserve Bank budgets.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

    Note: This meeting will be recorded for the benefit of those 
unable to attend. Cassettes will be available for listening in the 
Board's Freedom of Information Office, and copies may be ordered for 
$6 per cassette by calling 202-452-3684 or by writing to: Freedom of 
Information Office, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, Washington, D.C. 20551.

Contact Person for More Information: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 for a recorded 
announcement of this meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site 
at http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement. (The Web 
site also includes procedural and other information about the open 
meeting.)

    Dated: December 3, 1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32014 Filed 12-3-97; 10:50 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      128
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (241)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          34,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,002)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         21,609
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,985
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,580
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   569
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    229
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Oct - Dec

2006 Actual 70 46 2 48 (21) 31

Jan - Mar

2007 Actual 159 126 9 134 (25) 6

Apr - Jun

2007 Actual (153) (139) 5 (133) 19 25

Jul - Sep

2007 Actual 35 116 (31) 85 50 75

Oct - Dec

2007 Actual 91 126 (53) 73 (18) 57

Jan - Mar

2008 Actual 187 244 (68) 176 (11) 46

Apr - Jun

2008 Actual (74) 13 (80) (66) 7 53

Jul - Sep

2008 Actual 179 530 (33) 497 318 372

Oct - Dec

2008 Actual 556 569 (18) 551 (5) 367

Jan - Mar

2009 Actual 565 481 (14) 467 (98) 269

Apr - Jun

2009 Actual 278 343 (17) 327 49 318

Jul - Sep August 3, 2009 432 406 (22) 384 (48) 270

2009 Actual 415 393 (20) 372 (43) 275

Memo: Forecast Revision (17) (14) 2 (12) 5 5

Oct - Dec August 3, 2009 464 486 (22) 464 0 270

2009 November 2, 2009 449 276 (17) 259 (190) 85

Memo: Forecast Revision (15) (209) 4 (205) (190) (185)

Jan - Mar

2010 November 2, 2009 500 478 (18) 460 (40) 45

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

BANK OF AMERICA AUTO TRUST 2012-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Bank
of America, National Association (Bank of America), a national banking association, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2012 (as amended and
supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Bank of America Auto Trust 2012-1, U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee, the Servicer, and Bank of
America, as custodian, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 23rd day of
March, 2015.



/s/ Deborah L. LackName:

Deborah L. LackTitle:

Senior Vice President
No. 00-7503.

#### Whitt *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Re: SO2 NAAQS RIA for OPEI / OMB review 

Kathy Kaufman to: Mary Henigin 10/19/2009 03:24 PM

Cc:

Amy Lamson, Brian Heninger, Charlotte Bertrand, Darryl 

Weatherhead, David Misenheimer, James Hemby, Joseph-J 

Dougherty, Lydia Wegman, Nathalie Simon, Neal Fann, Ron Evans, 

Rosalina Rodriguez, "Alan Rush", Tricia Crabtree, Patricia Grim, 

Charles Fulcher

Mary --

By this email OAQPS is transmitting to you Sections 1 through 4 of the Ozone Reconsideration NAAQS 

RIA Supplemental Analysis, to transmit to OPEI for OMB review. 

The sections are attached below. 

Thanks!

-- Kathy

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C439-02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone 919 541 0102

Fax 919 541 5489
2022 U.S. Treasury Market Conference

November 16, 2022
Figure 1: Implied yield volatility

2
Figure 2: Depth compared to volatility

3
Figure 3: Price impact

4
Figure 4: Bid-ask spreads

5
Figure 5: Total transaction volumes

6
Figure 6: Net customer buys of deep off-the-runs

7

Start of the Federal Reserve’s market functioning purchases
Figure 7: Primary dealer reverse repo outstanding by mark

8

$Billions
Figure 8: Relative trading of nominal coupons

9
Figure 9: Trading of cash and futures

10
Figure 10: Implied minutes to transact large trades

11
Exhibit 15     November 8, 2006  Northeast Utilities 107 Selden Street Berlin, CT 06037  We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report dated November 8, 2006 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph related to significant charges recorded in connection with the Companys decision to exit certain business lines and the presentation of certain components of the Companys generation business as discontinued operations); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-34622, 33-40156, and 333-128811 on Forms S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-63023, 333-63144 and 333-121364 on Forms S-8 of Northeast Utilities.  We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


|    |                      
|--- | ---------------------
|/s/ | Deloitte & Touche LLP
|    | Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
Exhibit
10.31


 


To:


 


ScoutCam
Ltd. (the “Company”)


 


July
27, 2020


 


Re:
Patent License Agreement Termination


 


For
the sake of good order and in connection with the closing of a certain securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”)
by and between the Company’s parent company, ScoutCam Inc. and M. Arkin (1999) Ltd., this is to confirm that, by virtue of executing
this letter, the Patent License Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2019 by and between the Company and Medigus Ltd., attached hereto
as Schedule I, is null and void for all intents and purposes as of the date hereof.


 


Sincerely
yours,


 


	 	MEDIGUS
    LTD.


 


	 	Name:	/s/
    Liron Carmel /s/ Tatiana Yosef
	 	Title:	CEO
    / CFO


 


AGREED
AND ACKNOWLEDGED:


 


	 	SCOUTCAM
    LTD.


 


	 	Name:	/s/
    Benad Goldwasser /s/ Yaron Silberman
	 	Title:	Chairman
    / CEO
CERTS – Designation Form

This document is a short guide designed to support users of the CERTS Portal that represent 

multiple grantees or wish to designate new account users. The designation form allows account 

administrators to manage the access to their account and CERTS Portal documents. 

1. Accessing the Designation Form 

When a user represents multiple grantee accounts or if a primary user (account administrator) 

wishes to delegate the ability to fill out required portal documents, they must access the 

designation form.

1) After the user logs into the CERTS Portal with their ID.me credentials click in the 

upper left three white line icon. 
2) Once the three white line icon has been clicked select “Account”.

3) The user will be redirected to a list of all accounts under their login. If a user 

represents multiple grantees, multiple accounts will be visible. To make designations 

for an account click on the account name.
2. Using the Designation Form 

Once the user accesses the designation form, they can use it to add new users with specific 

access abilities. All new users will have to create ID.me credentials. 

1) The primary user that created the account and grant application is automatically 

assigned the “Account Administrator” role. Only the account administrator will be 

able to use the designation form functionality. 

2) After the user reads the instructions they will navigate to the “certification” tab. The 

user must read the certification, enter their name, and submit to be able to access 

functionality on the “Designation Form” tab 
3) Navigate to the designation form. With the designation form the account 

administrator can create new contacts for the selected account. If the user is not an 

account administrator there will be no role options in the “program-roles” section. 

4) The role access are as follows: Account administrator – Ability to access designation 

form, fill out forms, and submit forms, Authorized Representative - Ability to fill out 

forms and submit forms, Point of Contact – Ability to fill out forms (not able to 

submit form). 

5) Once the information is entered for a new contact and the complete button is clicked a 

record will be added to the contact list. The new user will then have to create an 

ID.me account to be able to access the CERTS Portal. For more information on 

ID.me registration click this link https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/ID.meInstructions-for-CERTS-Portal.pdf
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6890

CLARENCE MERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONALD W. FARLEY; ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA;

WILLIAM MEADOWS, Lieutenant; FIRST SERGEANT

WALTON; ROCKINGHAM-HARRISON REGIONAL JAIL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-345-R)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 20, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Merica, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Merica appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998)

complaint. The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is not

appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers’ Local Union

392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without

prejudice is a final order only if “‘no amendment [in the complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case.’” Id. at

1067 (quoting Coniston Corp. v. Village of Hoffman Estates, 844

F.2d 461, 463 (7th Cir. 1988)). In ascertaining whether a dismissal

without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must

determine “whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely

amending his complaint.” Domino Sugar, 10 F.3d at 1066-67. In this

case, Merica may move in the district court to reopen his case and

to file an amended complaint specifically alleging facts sufficient

to state a claim under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Therefore, the dismissal

order is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
U.S. Position on the Asian Development Bank’s Investment in the Second Greater 

Mekong Subregion Highway Modernization Project for Myanmar

October 29, 2020

The United States supports the Second Greater Mekong Subregion Highway in Myanmar. 

The United States recognizes the importance of this project to Myanmar, particularly in terms of 

regional connectivity. Myanmar has not been able to take full advantage of Greater Mekong 

Subregion corridors in country as infrastructure spending has not kept up with peers, a lapse 

that has surely weighed on potential GDP growth.

The United States appreciates the close engagement with the ADB team on an important 

category A project such as this one. The United States has been able, through early and 

frequent communication with the team, to leverage the expertise of the U.S. interagency

partners to resolve the following areas of concern:

• The United States supports ADB’s planned incremental approach to address the 

capacity of Myanmar’s Ministry of Construction. 

• The United States recognizes the need to monitor the cumulative impacts from this 

operation and other projects in the region, particularly regional transport infrastructure 

projects. The United States encourages the project team to incorporate into its 

monitoring and evaluation the final Sittaung Bridge Environmental Impact Assessment

findings and, further, to consider the broader induced impacts from the various projects 

in the area when monitoring and evaluating this operation. 

• The expansion of the Greater Mekong Subregion’s highways is intended to promote 

economic and social activities – including factories, tourism, and trade – which can have 

positive cumulative impacts. However, the Greater Mekong Subregion Core 

Environment Program, Environmental Assessment of Economic Corridors and Sectors, 

Implementation Status Report, January 2008 stated that the corridor will also inevitably 

lead to negative environmental and social impacts, particularly cumulative effects across 

infrastructure projects. The United States encourages staff to monitor these regional 

transport projects in order to successfully mitigate these potential negative side effects.

The United States asks that the team pay close attention to resettlement so as to ensure 

that the associated communities ultimately benefit from the project.

• Finally, the United States also appreciates the steps ADB has taken to address financial 

sustainability concerns associated with the project. The use of an optimal tariff structure 

and enforceable operations and maintenance agreements will be key to success. We 

encourage ADB to leverage its knowledge of toll policy to collaborate with the Ministry of 

Finance to design an effective system that can be replicated across Myanmar.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

EARL BRADDY , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 18

- 1209

[ July 5, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.85 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr.

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00

- 020675

- CF

- 10A (FF)

.
Earl Braddy, Jasper

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

M AY , C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.