alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2426 

To prohibit the transfer of a firearm to a person whose State license to 

purchase, own, or possess a firearm has been revoked, or a person 

who has been ordered by a State court to surrender all firearms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Mr. RASKIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the transfer of a firearm to a person whose 

State license to purchase, own, or possess a firearm 

has been revoked, or a person who has been ordered 

by a State court to surrender all firearms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Access to Fire5 arms Evading Revocation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2426 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OF FIREARM TO PER2 SON WHOSE STATE LICENSE TO PURCHASE, 

3 OWN, OR POSSESS A FIREARM HAS BEEN RE4 VOKED OR WHO HAS BEEN ORDERED BY A 

5 STATE COURT TO SURRENDER ALL FIRE6 ARMS. 

7 Section 922(d) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended in the first sentence— 

9 (1) in paragraph (8)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

10 the end; 

11 (2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at 

12 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(10)(A) has had a license or permit, issued by 

15 a State in which the person has resided that allows 

16 the person to purchase, own, or possess a firearm, 

17 revoked by the State, and has not had the license or 

18 permit reinstated; or 

19 ‘‘(B) has been ordered by a court of such a 

20 State to surrender all firearms owned or possessed 

21 by the person, and has not had the firearms lawfully 

22 returned.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Jan - Mar

2011 Actual 470 265 (20) 245 (225) 118 0

Apr - Jun

2011 Actual 149 190 (22) 167 19 137 0

Jul - Sep

2011 Actual 342 286 (23) 264 (79) 58 0

Oct - Dec

2011 Actual 284 310 2 312 28 86 0

Jan - Mar

2012 Actual 440 401 (3) 398 (42) 43 0

Apr - Jun

2012 Actual 129 172 5 177 48 91 0

Jul - Sep

2012 Actual 234 264 (36) 228 (6) 85 (32)

Oct - Dec

2012 Actual 291 297 1 298 7 93 (1)

Jan - Mar

2013 Actual 354 349 (8) 341 (14) 79 0

Apr - Jun

2013 Actual (73) (11) (7) (18) 56 135 0

Jul - Sep

2013 Actual 205 197 (38) 159 (46) 88 0

Oct - Dec

2013 Actual 179 264 (11) 253 74 162 0

Jan - Mar

2014 Actual 275 265 (10) 254 (20) 142 0

Apr - Jun

2014 Actual (60) (64) 1 (63) (3) 139 0

Jul - Sep

2014 Actual 176 205 (10) 195 19 158 0

Oct - Dec

2014 Actual 170 227 8 236 65 223 0

Jan - Mar

2015 Actual 268 141 3 144 (123) 100 0

Apr - Jun

2015 Actual (120) 57 (22) 35 154 254 0

Jul - Sep

2015 Actual 163 133 (26) 107 (56) 199 0

Oct - Dec

2015 Actual 212 354 (7) 347 135 333 0

Jan - Mar February 1, 2016 263 250 (1) 249 (13) 320 0

2016 Actual 266 244 3 247 (20) 314 0

Forecast Revisions 4 (6) 4 (2) (6) (6) 0

Apr - Jun February 1, 2016 (137) (112) 5 (107) 30 350 0

2016 May 2, 2016 (86) (65) 15 (50) 36 350 0

Forecast Revisions 51 47 10 57 6 0 0

Jul - Sep

2016 May 2, 2016 212 155 7 161 (50) 300 0

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
2 of 5: Hg Coal & IGCC Floor Spreadsheets RobertJ Wayland to: Cortney_Higgins 11/21/2011 03:49 PM

Cc: Bill Maxwell

IGCC_floor analysis_111811.xlsx

Coal_Hg_floor analysis_111811.xlsx
#### Tellice JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-142.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

ONYX SERVICE & SOLUTIONS, INC. 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the period  ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr., Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr. and will be retained by Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 Dated: November 14, 2011

 

By: /s/ Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr. Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr., 

Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

ONYX SERVICE & SOLUTIONS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Onyx Service& Solutions, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the period  ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr. and will be retained by Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

  

 Dated: November 14, 2011

 

By: /s/ Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr.

Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr.

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc. (the
Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David E. Snyder, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2011



/S/    DAVID E.
SNYDERDavid E. Snyder Chief Financial Officer
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2017

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/29 1/3 1/5 45.00 34.00 28.00 20.00 132.00 -5.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 1/5 1/10 1/12 45.00 34.00 28.00 119.00 -12.00

1/12 1/17 1/19 45.00 34.00 28.00 129.00 -22.00

1/19 1/24 1/26 45.00 34.00 28.00 124.00 -17.00

1/26 1/31 2/2 45.00 34.00 28.00 20.00 137.00 -10.00

2/2 2/7 2/9 35.00 34.00 28.00 121.00 -24.00

2/9 2/14 2/16 35.00 34.00 28.00 121.00 -24.00

2/16 2/21 2/23 35.00 34.00 28.00 118.00 -21.00

2/23 2/28 3/2 35.00 34.00 28.00 20.00 135.00 -18.00

3/2 3/7 3/9 35.00 34.00 28.00 105.00 -8.00

3/9 3/14 3/16 50.00 38.00 34.00 105.00 17.00

3/16 3/21 3/23 50.00 42.00 38.00 105.00 25.00

3/23 3/28 3/30 55.00 42.00 38.00 20.00 125.00 30.00

1487.00 1576.00 -89.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

35-DAY CMB 3/16 45.00 0.00 45.00

Matures 4/20

CMB Funds: 45.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

2-year note 12/22 12/27 1/3 26.00 0.00

5-year note 12/22 12/28 1/3 34.00 0.00

7-year note 12/22 12/29 1/3 28.00 0.00 84.38 3.62

3-year Note 1/5 1/10 1/17 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 1/5 1/11 1/17 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 1/5 1/12 1/17 12.00 0.00 47.51 8.49

10-year TIPS 1/12 1/19 1/31 13.00 0.00

2-year note 1/19 1/24 1/31 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 1/19 1/25 1/31 15.00 0.00

5-year note 1/19 1/25 1/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 1/19 1/26 1/31 28.00 0.00 127.82 -11.82

3-year Note 2/1 2/7 2/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note 2/1 2/8 2/15 23.00 0.00

30-year Bond 2/1 2/9 2/15 15.00 0.00 45.03 16.97

2-year FRN (r) 2/16 2/22 2/24 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

30-year TIPS 2/9 2/16 2/28 7.00 0.00

2-year note 2/16 2/21 2/28 26.00 0.00

5-year note 2/16 2/22 2/28 34.00 0.00

7-year note 2/16 2/23 2/28 28.00 0.00 81.11 13.89

3-year Note 3/2 3/7 3/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 3/2 3/8 3/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 3/2 3/9 3/15 12.00 0.00 30.00 26.00

10-year TIPS (r) 3/16 3/23 3/31 11.00 0.00

2-year note 3/23 3/27 3/31 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 3/23 3/28 3/31 13.00 0.00

5-year note 3/23 3/29 3/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 3/23 3/29 3/31 28.00 0.00 81.35 30.65

598.00 497.2 100.80

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 57
#### Robert F. KRAEMER, Appellant, v. Lois A. KRAEMER, Appellee.

No. 69-632.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 29, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart F. LaMotte, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
257 La. 278

#### John A. SIM v. BEAUREGARD ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, Inc.

No. 51040.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 5, 1971.

In re: Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ or review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Beauregard. 241 So.2d 26.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.
U.S. TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1ST QUARTER 2002 

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW FED NON

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY ROLLOVER

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4 WEEK AND 12/27 12/31 01/03 7.00 14.70 17.65 43.7 -4.38 0.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 01/03 01/07 01/10 6.00 12.00 14.00 38.7 -6.72 0.00

01/10 01/14 01/17 6.00 13.00 13.00 37.8 -5.82 0.00

01/17 01/21 01/24 6.00 14.00 13.00 37.8 -4.79 0.00

01/24 01/28 01/31 10.00 15.00 14.00 35.8 3.15 0.00

01/31 02/04 02/07 10.00 15.00 14.00 36.0 3.00 0.00

02/07 02/11 02/14 12.00 15.00 14.00 36.0 5.00 0.00

02/14 02/18 02/21 15.00 15.00 14.00 36.0 8.00 0.00

02/21 02/25 02/28 15.00 15.00 14.00 39.0 5.00 2.76

02/26 03/04 03/07 19.00 15.00 14.00 39.0 9.00 0.00

03/07 03/11 03/14 23.00 15.00 14.00 38.0 14.00 0.00

03/14 03/18 03/21 23.00 14.00 13.00 41.0 9.00 0.00

03/21 03/25 03/28 23.00 13.00 12.00 41.0 7.00 0.00

541.35 499.92 41.44 2.76

* Note: There was an error at the December 31 auctions that resulted in more 3 and 6 month bills being issued than the originally announced $13 and $15 billion

1-YEAR BILLS

02/28 0.00 10.0 -10.00 -2.76

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-Year TIPS 01/02 01/09 01/15 6.00 +1.00 0.0 6.00 0.00

2-Year Note 01/23 01/30 01/31 25.00 +2.00 27.1 -2.07 0.00

5-Year Note (R) 01/31 02/05 02/15 15.00 -1.00

10-Year Note 01/31 02/06 02/15 28.00 13.00 4.1 23.70 0.00

2-Year Note 02/20 02/27 02/28 25.00 23.6 1.37 0.00

84.00 54.99 29.01 0.00

R=Reopening NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 60.44

A = Announced NET FED ROLLOVER: 0.00

MARKETABLE BORROWING: 60.44

BUYBACKS: 0.00

TOTAL NET BORROWING: 60.44

Treasury announced a 

Q1 borrowing need of 

$60 billion on 1/28/02.

A A A

A A A

A A A

A A A

A A A

A

*

A
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6883

KEVIN L. CHOICE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:03-cv-01999-RBH) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin L. Choice, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kevin L. Choice seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Choice has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Cite as Mirto v. Trumbull Correctional Inst. , 2010-Ohio-3153.] 

# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

ARTHUR L. MIRTO

Plaintiff

v.

TRUMBULL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Defendant

Case No. 2009-08969-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT
{¶ 1} 1) On October 8, 2009, a van owned by plaintiff, Arthur L. Mirto, was damaged by an employee of defendant, Trumbull Correctional Institution (TCI). Plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover damages in the amount of $596.84, the total cost
of vehicle repair. In his complaint, plaintiff advised he carries insurance coverage for vehicle repair with a $250.00 deductible provision and he acknowledged his insurer paid $346.84 toward the cost of repair. Pursuant to the provisions of R.C. 2743.02(D) 1

, plaintiff’s damage claim is limited to $250.00, his insurance coverage deductible. Plaintiff submitted the $25.00 filing fee and he has requested reimbursement of that cost along with his damage claim.
{¶ 2} 2) Defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability for the damage to plaintiff’s vehicle.

1 R.C. 2743.02(D) provides in pertinent part: “(D) Recoveries against the states shall be reduced by the aggregate of insurance proceeds,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
{¶ 3} 1) Negligence on the part of defendant has been established. Johnson v. State Highway Patrol (2002), 2001-12347-AD; Zapf v. Highway Patrol , Ct. of Cl. No.
2006-07511-AD, 2007-Ohio-3104; Landman v. Ohio State Highway Patrol , Ct. of Cl. No.
2007-01801-AD, 2007-Ohio-2414; Hutchison v. State Highway Patrol , Ct. of Cl. No.
2008-06318-AD, 2008-Ohio-5627; Kovacik v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol , Ct. of Cl. No.
2008-09619-AD, 2009-Ohio-1592.
{¶ 4} 2) Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $250.00, plus the $25.00 filing fee which may be reimbursed as compensable costs pursuant to R.C.

2335.19. See Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1990), 62
Ohio Misc. 2d 19, 587 N.E. 2d 990.



# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

ARTHUR L. MIRTO

Plaintiff

v.

TRUMBULL CORRECTION INSTITUTION

Defendant

Case No. 2009-08969-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

disability award, or other collateral recovery received by the claimant.”ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $275.00, whic h includes the filing fee. Court costs are assessed against defendant.

DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Arthur L. Mirto Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 5677 Stanford Avenue Department of Rehabilitation Austintown, Ohio 44515 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222
RDK/laa 2/25 Filed 3/12/10 Sent to S.C. reporter 7/1/10
EXHIBIT 32
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  Exhibit 32
 
 
 Certification pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 Michael R. Kallet, President and Chief Executive Officer and Eric E. Stickels, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Oneida Financial Corp. (the “Company”) each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)
the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 March 21, 2011
/s/ Michael R. KalletDate
President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 21, 2011
/s/ Eric E. StickelsDate
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial and accounting Officer)
Exhibit 99

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Congoleum Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Roger S.
Marcus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and H. N. Feist III, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


------------------------------
Name:  Roger S. Marcus
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 12, 2002


------------------------------
Name:  Howard N. Feist III
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 12, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEONARD MANEGENG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71841

Agency No. A095-629-993

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 21, 2014** 

Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Leonard Manegeng, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v.

FILED

JAN 24 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the

petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Manegeng’s motion to

reopen as untimely because the motion was filed more than four years after the

BIA’s final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Manegeng did not demonstrate

materially changed conditions in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception

to the time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii);

Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987 (evidence must be “qualitatively different” from the

evidence presented at the previous hearing). We reject Manegeng’s contention that

the BIA failed to adequately consider the evidence presented with the motion to

reopen. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990-91. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision not to reopen

removal proceedings sua sponte. See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818,

823-24 (9th Cir. 2011). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 12-71841
State of California - Department of Fish andWildlife



# 2016 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEECASH RECEIPT DFW 753.5a (Rev. 12l15/15) Previously DFG 753.5a

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINTCLEARLY. LEAD AGENCY GREAT BASIN UNIFIED 

### AIR POLLUTION 

### CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECTAPPLICANT NAME 

## CITY OF LOS ANGELES PROJECT APPLICANT ADDRESS 1

## 57SHORT STREET IPT NUMBER: 

# 14-04142016-010 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER (lf applicable)



# 04t14t2016 COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILING 

# Ï NUMBER 

## l!nvo 

## 16-016 PROJECTTITLE 

### cREAT BASTN UNtFtED 

### AtRpOLLUT|ON CONTROL DtSTRICT RULE 

### 433 (CONTROL OF PARTICULATE EMMISSIONS 

### AT OWENS LAKE) PHONE NUMBER 

# (760)872-8211 ZIP CODE 

## 93514 @ Locat Public Agency 

# n School District 

# I Otner Special D¡str¡ct 

# f] state Agency 

# E Private Entity LEADAGENCY EMAIL

PROJECT APPLICANT EMAIL 

## BISHOP PROJECT 

### APPLICANT (Check appropr¡ate box)

CHECK 

### APPLICABLE FEES: 

## @ Environmental lmpact Report (ElR) 

# ! Mitigated/Negative Declaration (MNDXND) 

# E Certified Regulatory Program document (CRP) Exemptfrom

### fee 

# ! Notice of Exemption (attach) 

# fl CDFW No Effect Determinat¡on (attach) Fee previously paid (attach previously issued cash receipt copy) 

# E Water RightApplication or Petition Fee (State Water Resources Control Board only) 

# ! County documentary handlingfee 

# ! other PAYMENT METHOD: 

# ! Cash I Credit 

# E Check 

# ! Other 

## $3,070.00 $ 

## $2,210.25 $ 

## $r,043.75 $



## $850.00 $

$ $ 

### TOTAL

## RECEIVED $ 

### 3,070.00 0.00 0.00 

# ! ! 0.00 0.00
3,070.00 OF FILING PRINTED NAMEAND TITLE 

## MICHELE HARTSHORN, DEPUTY

ORIGINAL - PROJECT APPLICANT COPY -CDFWASB COPY - LEAD AGENCY COPY -COUNTY CLERK DFW 753 5a (Rev 20151215)