alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62953-62954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[FRL-5927-4]


Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; Standards of 
Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants; Clarification

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of policy; clarification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action clarifies the applicability of the New Source 
Performance Standards for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants (40 CFR 
part 60, subpart OOO). This action is necessary because of incorrect 
guidance and preamble language regarding the regulation's applicability 
to affected facilities in the nonmetallic mineral processing industry. 
The April 1991 Regulatory and Inspection Manual for Nonmetallic Mineral 
Processing Plants included the following incorrect statement: ``Subpart 
OOO affected facilities begin with the first crushing or grinding 
operation at the plant.'' The same incorrect statement was made in a 
response to a comment in the preamble to the June 9, 1997, Federal 
Register document for the final amendments to subpart OOO.
    Section 60.670(a) of subpart OOO lists the affected facilities in 
fixed or portable nonmetallic mineral processing plants. This list 
includes each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket 
elevator, belt conveyor, bagging operation, storage bin, and enclosed 
truck or railcar loading station. The clear intent of the regulation is 
that all facilities listed in section 60.670(a) are subject to subpart 
OOO. While subpart OOO affected operations typically have crushers or 
grinding mills located at or near the beginning of the nonmetallic 
mineral processing line, this is not always the case (e.g., some plants 
may convey, screen or otherwise process materials without first 
utilizing a crusher located in the plant). Therefore, with this 
document, the EPA is clarifying that as long as crushing or grinding 
occurs anywhere at a non-metallic mineral processing plant, any 
affected facility listed in Sec. 60.670(a) is subject to subpart OOO 
regardless of its location within the plant. EPA expects that plants 
that have not considered facilities prior to the first crushing or 
grinding operation as affected facilities, will now ensure that those 
affected facilities will meet all of the applicable regulatory 
requirements.


[[Page 62954]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Scott Throwe at (202) 564-7013, 
Manufacturing, Energy, and Transportation Division (2223A), U.S. EPA, 
401 M Street, Washington, D.C. 20460.

    Dated: November 20, 1997.
Scott A. Throwe,
Environmental Protection Specialist.
[FR Doc. 97-30950 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 8-29-2005 

# P ar ip ovic v . Atty Ge n U SA P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 03-4193

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " P a r ipo vic v

. Atty Ge n U SA" (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 585. h tt p://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/585U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT A ugus t24, 2005 N o. 03- 4193 Z E L J K O PA R I PO V I C , Pet i t i oner

v. A T T O R N E Y G E N E R A L O F U N I T E D ST A T E S, R es pondent ( O n Pet i t i on forR evi ew fr om D O J - O I L : A 72- 780- 152) P res ent : A M B R O , V A N A N T W E R P E N and S T A P L E T O N , C i rcui t Judges

U noppos ed M ot i on byR es pondentt o A m end orM odi fyO pi ni on fi l ed A ugus t12, 2005. / s/A i na R . L aw s C as e M anage r267- 299- 4957 O R D E R T h e f o re g o in g u n o p p o se d m o tio n b yR e sp o n d e n t to a m e n d o r m o d if yth e O p in io n is gr ant ed.

B yth e C o u rt, / s /T hom as L . A m br o C i r cui tJ udge D at ed: A ugus t29, 2005 AR L / c c : S KJ ; DE D; RME; DE G; J DW
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002



In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Yangtze River Development Limited (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”), Xiangyao Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Annual Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The
    information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
    of operations of the Company.



|By: | /s/
    Xiangyao Liu            | 
|--- | ------------------------------- | 
|    | Xiangyao
    Liu                | 
|    | Principal
    Executive Officer | 



Dated:
February 17, 2016
# About this File

# About this File 

# ERA2 Summary

# ERA2 Rental Asst. by Income

# ERA2 Rental Asst. Demographics

# ERA2 Rental Households Assisted

# ERA2 Obligations & Expenditures
Exhibit 99

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Conolog Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2003
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 13, 2003                        /s/ Robert Benou
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Robert Benou
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated: June 13, 2003                        /s/ Marc Benou
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Marc Benou
                                            Title:  Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.

      (A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Conolog Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Utilities (the
registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Michael G.
Morris, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and
John H. Forsgren, Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Michael G. Morris
    (Signature)
    Michael G. Morris
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

November 7, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and
will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)




I, Clifford J. Vallier, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of Greektown Superholdings, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;





4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;





5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date:  March 25, 2011
/s/ Clifford J. VallierClifford J. VallierChief Financial Officer




- 101 -
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of DE Acquisition 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis Nguyen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Dennis Nguyen

Dennis Nguyen

Principal Executive Officer

June 6, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5993-5994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Accute Infection and Early Disease Research.
    Date: March 4-5, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: Bethesda Ramada Hotel, Ambassador 1 Conference Room, 8400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 654-1000.
    Contact Person: Dr. Stanley C. Oaks, Scientific Review Adm., 
6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C10, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-7042.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.855, 
Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health)


[[Page 5994]]


    Dated: February 4, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-3209 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Willie B. CLARK, Charles A. Brown, Robert G. Coleman, Jr., Ronald J. Nelson and Charles D. Wade, Petitioners, v. Warren H. EDWARDS, Judge of the Criminal Court of Record, Division A, Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-66.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 29, 1970.

Peter M. deManio, Orlando, for petitioners.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek mandamus to compel their discharge and the dismissal of the pending criminal charges and accusations against them of robbery. The petitioners assert that they have been denied a speedy trial under, and as provided for in, Section 915.01(2), F.S.1967, F.S.A.

There were five motions made by the petitioners and filed on April 29, 1969; May 15, 1969; July 14, 1969; September 8, 1969; and November 10, 1969. There is a question of timely filing of one motion and withdrawal of counsel during another term, but there are still three timely motions filed. The reason for not bringing the petitioners to trial is the crowded docket of the court. Although this is understandable, it is not sufficient reason for denying the petitioners a right to a speedy *400trial under Section 915.01(2), F.S.1967, F.S.A., and under the Constitution, Declaration of Rights, Sections 4 and 11, F.S.A.

Upon reviewing the records, and based on Dickey v. Circuit Court, Gadsden County, Fla.1967, 200 So.2d 521, and other cases cited to this court, it is clear that the petitioners’ right to a speedy trial has been violated and that they are entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, the peremptory writ of mandamus is issued with direction that accuseds be discharged from prosecution.

It is so ordered.

CROSS, C. J., McCAIN, J., and LEAV-ENGOOD, C. RICHARD, Associate Judge, concur.
#### Bedros AZAROGLU, Petitioner, v. Gladys B. JORDAN et al., Respondents.

No. 43296.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 270 So.2d 422.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
No. 00-7504.

#### Webb *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Eugene E. JONES v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 39409.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
Table 1. U.S. holdings of foreign securities, by type of security, as of survey dates1

(Billions of dollars) 

Type of Security Dec. 31, 2005 Dec. 31, 2006

Long-term Securities 4,346 5,623

 Equity 3,318 4,329

 Long-term debt 1,028 1,294

Short-term debt securities 263 368

Total 4,609 5,991

U.S. Portfolio Investment by Country

Table 2. U.S. holdings of foreign securities, by country of issuer and type of security, for the 

countries attracting the most U.S. portfolio investment, as of December 31, 2006 

(Billions of dollars, except as noted) 

 

 Country Total Equity LT Debt ST Debt

1 United Kingdom 1,076 674 245 156 

2 Japan 596 544 46 7 

3 Canada 478 298 162 18 

4 France 402 307 63 32 

5 Cayman Islands 376 161 178 37 

6 Germany 292 220 62 10 

7 Switzerland 264 263 1 * 

8 Netherlands 234 161 68 5 

9 Bermuda 208 192 14 3 

10 Australia 173 102 62 10 

11 Korea, South 124 114 10 * 

12 Ireland 121 48 38 34 

13 Spain 111 86 24 1 

14 Brazil 110 92 18 * 

15 Mexico 108 85 24 * 

16 Italy 106 94 12 1 

17 Sweden 102 59 24 19 

18 Hong Kong 88 86 2 * 

19 China, mainland2 75 74 1 * 

20 Taiwan 74 74 * * 

21 Luxembourg 60 16 37 7 

22 Finland 60 56 4 * 

23 Netherlands Antilles 58 56 2 * 

24 Singapore 53 44 9 * 

25 Norway 51 32 15 4 

 Rest of world 592 393 174 24 

Total 5,991 4,329 1,294 368 

 

1

 The stock of foreign securities for December 31, 2006 reported in this survey may not, for a number of reasons, 

correspond to the stock of foreign securities on December 31, 2005, plus cumulative flows reported in Treasury’s 

transactions reporting system. The final report on U.S. holdings of foreign securities as of end-year 2006 will contain an 

analysis of the relation between the stock and flow data. 

2

 Excludes Hong Kong and Macau, which are reported separately. 

* Greater than zero but less than $500 million.
No. 00-7516.

#### Consolvo *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Jan - Mar

2007 Actual 159 126 9 134 (25) 6

Apr - Jun

2007 Actual (153) (139) 5 (133) 19 25

Jul - Sep

2007 Actual 35 116 (31) 85 50 75

Oct - Dec

2007 Actual 91 126 (53) 73 (18) 57

Jan - Mar

2008 Actual 187 244 (68) 176 (11) 46

Apr - Jun

2008 Actual (74) 13 (80) (66) 7 53

Jul - Sep

2008 Actual 179 530 (33) 497 318 372

Oct - Dec

2008 Actual 556 569 (18) 551 (5) 367

Jan - Mar

2009 Actual 565 481 (14) 467 (98) 269

Apr - Jun

2009 Actual 278 343 (17) 327 49 318

Jul - Sep

2009 Actual 415 393 (20) 372 (43) 275

Oct - Dec

2009 Actual 340 260 (3) 258 (82) 194

Jan - Mar

2010 Actual 446 483 (12) 471 25 219

Apr - Jun

2010 Actual 263 344 (10) 334 71 290

Jul - Sep

2010 Actual 362 396 (14) 382 20 310

Oct - Dec

2010 Actual 326 363 (4) 359 33 343

Jan - Mar

2011 Actual 470 265 (20) 245 (225) 118

Apr - Jun

2011 Actual 149 190 (22) 167 19 137

Jul - Sep

2011 Actual 342 286 (23) 264 (79) 58

Oct - Dec

2011 Actual 284 310 2 312 28 86

Jan - Mar

2012 Actual 440 401 (3) 398 (42) 43

Apr - Jun

2012 Actual 129 172 5 177 48 91

Jul - Sep

2012 Actual 234 264 (36) 228 (6) 85

Oct - Dec

2012 Actual 291 297 1 298 7 93

Jan - Mar February 4, 2013 386 331 (7) 324 (63) 30

2013 Actuals 354 349 (8) 341 (14) 79

Forecast Revisions (32) 18 (1) 17 49 49

Apr - Jun February 4, 2013 68 103 (5) 98 30 60

2013 April 29, 2013 (34) (35) (4) (38) (4) 75

Forecast Revisions (102) (138) 2 (136) (34) 15

Jul - Sep

2013 April 29, 2013 184 223 (33) 189 5 80

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
#### In re ESTATE of Mary P. QUINN, Deceased. GUARDIANSHIP OF Kathleen D. QUINN et al., minors.

No. 73-916.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 17, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Virgil B. Conkling, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6853

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Cromwell, Appellant Pro Se. John Farrell Butler, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cromwell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction pursuant to § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub L. No. 115-391, 

132 Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cromwell, No. 2:11-

cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 16, 2019; entered May 17, 2019). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED