alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.    /s/
Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer    /s/ David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  May 8, 2009    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Adolphus WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-328.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 14, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1973.

Edward R. Kirkland, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Stephen R. Koons, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of three counts charging him with violation of the lottery *131laws. Defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict of acquittal. Based upon our review of the evidence in the record we are of the opinion that the state failed to make a prima facie case and the motion for directed verdict should have been granted.

The state’s evidence of possession of lottery tickets, lottery paraphernalia and assisting in the conduct of a lottery was circumstantial arid based on the fact that defendant resided on the premises wherein the contraband was found. The evidence revealed that other persons, in addition to the defendant, occupied the subject premises and that such premises was not in the exclusive possession and control of the accused.1

Where contraband is found on premises in joint possession the proof must establish both the accused’s knowledge of the contraband’s presence and his ability to maintain control over it. Smith v. State, Fla.App.1973, 276 So.2d 91. The proof may consist of either actual knowledge or evidence of incriminating circumstances from which a jury could infer knowledge by the accused of the presence of contraband on the premises; merely having been present or being present where such contraband is found is not sufficient proof of possession where there is no exclusive possession of the premises. Smith v. State, supra; Medlin v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 41; Arant v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 515; Markman v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 486; Kirtley v. State, Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 282; Torres v. State, Fla.App.1971, 253 So.2d 450; Frank v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 117. See also, Miller v. State, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 319; compare with Lattimore v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 771.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence herein is vacated and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge the defendant.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and SMITH, CULVER, Associate Judge, concur.

1

. The testimony is unrefuted that the items seized came from rooms other than the bedroom which defendant claimed he had rented.
Exhibit 32.1 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Corning Natural Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 (the "Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael I. German, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and I, Firouzeh Sarhangi, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

Dated:  May 12, 2010
Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Michael G. Morris, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and John H. Forsgren,
Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Michael G. Morris
    (Signature)
    Michael G. Morris
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and
will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Technology Applications International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles J. Scimeca, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ *Charles J. Scimeca*

By: Charles J. Scimeca

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Dated: April 16, 2013
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Willie Mae Black BOWLIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry W. BOWLIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11199.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 29, 1969.

John M. Brown, Shreveport, for appellant.

Dean R. Veatch, Shreveport, for appel-lee.

Before GLADNEY, AYRES, and PRICE, JJ.

AYRES, Judge.

Visitation privileges of a father with his minor son whose custody was awarded to his mother is the only matter presented on this appeal. Because of cruelty and inhuman treatment, the wife was granted a separation a mensa et thoro and was awarded custody of the child. No reconciliation having taken place between the *638parties, the wife was subsequently granted a divorce. That judgment, however, was silent as to the custody of the child, but in a later proceeding the mother was awarded custody. The husband’s rights and privileges were recognized but restricted to the hours between 8:00 a. m. and 5 :00 p. m. on the first and third Saturdays of each month.

The father contends that he should have the privilege of the child’s .visits for at least three times instead of twice per month. He accordingly appealed from the judgment.

The minor, John Wesley Bowlin, is now approximately seven years and nine months of age. The mother, employed at a supermarket, works on Saturdays. During her working hours the child’s custody is entrusted to a babysitter or other attendant. The record reflects the mother’s concern that the father has, on an occasion, while in a drunken condition, picked the child up at school. Nevertheless, the mother makes no complaint as to the privileges granted the father in the judgment appealed.

Certain legal principles governing situations such as exist here are well established in the jurisprudence of this State. For instance, where parents are separated or divorced and the care and custody of their children are vested in one parent, the other has natural rights with respect to the children, including the right of access and visitation, which may be exercised under reasonable restrictions as circumstances warrant and within the court’s discretion, unless the parent has forfeited these rights by his conduct, or unless the exercise of the privilege would injuriously affect the children’s welfare. The welfare of a child requires that his custody and control be under undivided authority. The visitation privilege of the parent who has been deprived of custody should never be extended to the point where it becomes a divided custody or results in a division of authority. A reasonable latitude must be left to the trial judge in determining matters affecting the welfare of children, and his determination, based upon facts established by the record, is entitled to great weight. Johnson v. Johnson, 214 La. 912, 39 So.2d 340 (1949).

Appellant herein has advanced no valid reasons to show that the trial court abused its discretion. We find no error in the ruling complained of.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.
July 26, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GARY EDMUND HAYNES , Appellant
NO. 14

- 15

- 00752

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having consider ed the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by app ellant, Gary Edmund Haynes.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 12



CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)



_____________________________________________________________________________
Twelve Months to September 30                                          1996
_____________________________________________________________________________
Earnings:
  Net income................................................         $297,766
  Add income taxes..........................................          154,249
                                                                     ________
    Income before income taxes..............................          452,015
  Distributed income from unconsolidated investees,
    less equity in earnings thereof.........................            6,793
                                                                     ________
    Subtotal................................................          458,808
                                                                     ________

  Add fixed charges:
    Interest on long-term debt, including amortization
      of debt discount and expense less premium.............           98,875
    Other interest expense..................................            9,370
    Portion of rentals deemed to be representative
      of the interest factor................................           10,095
    Fixed charges associated with 50% projects with debt....            1,623
                                                                     ________
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES.........................................          119,963
                                                                     ________
TOTAL EARNINGS..............................................         $578,771
                                                                     ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES..........................             4.82
                                                                     ========
_____________________________________________________________________________
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64819-64820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-497-002]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

December 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing a final reconciliation report of the Sea 
Robin Pipeline Company (Sea Robin) Account No. 858 surcharge. On 
September 29, 1997 Koch filed in Docket No. RP97-497-001, its 
intentions to terminate the collection of the Sea Robin Account No. 858 
surcharge. In a Letter Order dated the 14th October, the Commission 
accepted these tariff sheets with an effective date of October 1, 1997. 
This report reflects the amount refunded to each shipper plus the 
applicable interest earned since October 1, 1997.

[[Page 64820]]

    Koch has served copies of this filing upon each person on the 
official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding as 
well as each affected customer, state commission, and other interested 
parties.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before December 10, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32130 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG. 100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

November 2, 2015

Hon. Anne Lorentzen

District Clerk 901 Leopard St., Suite 313 Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 14

- 00322

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. 2012CCV

- 62067

- 3 Style: CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION D/B/A CHRISTUS

S POHN HOSPITAL CORPUS CHRISTI

- SHORELINE v. JEANNE K.

GOODHEW

The judgment of the trial court in the above cause was REVERSED AND REMANDE D by this Court on the 19 th day of March, 2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Costs of the appeal were adjudged agains t appellee, JEANNE K. GOODHEW.

Pursuant to Section 51.204(b) of the Government Code, the attorneys of record are hereby notified that any exhibits submitted to the Court by a party may be withdrawn by that party or the party’s attorney of record within 30 days. Exhibits on file with the Court will be destroyed three (3) years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the

Court.



### Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Warren Szutse Huang (DELIVERE D VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Cynthia T. Sheppard (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
Southern Connecticut Bancorp 10-KA





Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No.1 to the the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Southern Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company“) for the period ended December 31, 2011(the “Report“), I, Joseph J. Greco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, The Bank of Southern Connecticut, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2011 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).




Date: May 1, 2012





By:
/s/ JOSEPH J. GRECOJoseph J. Greco

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.27


EXHIBIT F





AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES FOR INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





In accordance with Section 8.09 of the Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of June 20, 2019 among OFSCC-FS, LLC, as borrower (the “Borrower”), the lenders from time to time parties thereto, BNP Paribas, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”), OFSCC-FS Holdings, LLC, as equityholder, OFS Capital Corporation, as servicer (the “Servicer”), Citibank, N.A., as collateral agent, and Virtus Group, LP, as collateral administrator (as the same may from time to time be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified, the “Revolving Credit Agreement”), the Servicer will cause a firm of nationally recognized independent public accountants to furnish in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants a report to the effect that such accountants have verified, compared to the systems, underwriting files, compliance certificates, underlying loan documents, or other relevant materials, or recalculated each of the following items in the Monthly Report to the applicable system or records of the Servicer:





ꞏ Collateral Loan List:


o    Loan Type (First Lien Loan, First Lien Last Out Loan, Second Lien Loan)


o    Loan Class (Class 1 Loan, Class 1A Loan, Class 2 Loan, Class 3 Loan)


o    Principal Balance


o    Adjusted Principal Balance


o    Collateral Loan Purchase Date (date Collateral Loan was added to facility)


o    Purchase Price


o    Collateral Loan Maturity Date


o    Interest Rate (Floating/Fixed), Index, LIBOR Floor, spread, PIK


o    Moody’s Industry Classification


o    Moody’s and S&P ratings (if applicable)


o    Unfunded Amount


o    Net Senior Debt Leverage Ratio and Net Total Debt Leverage Ratio


o    Debt Service Coverage Ratio


o    Interest Coverage Ratio


o    Borrowing Base


o    Advances Outstanding


o    Discretionary Sales Calculations in accordance with Section 10.01(a)


o    Defaulted Collateral Loan Sales Calculations in accordance with Section 10.03(a)(iv) (includes substitutions)


o    Excess Concentration Amounts


o    Minimum OC Coverage Test by Class


o    Priority of Payments in accordance with Section 9.01 of the Revolving Credit Agreement





At the discretion of the Administrative Agent and a firm of nationally recognized


independent public accountants, one Monthly Report and one Payment Date Report beginning


with the 2019 fiscal year will be chosen and reviewed in accordance with Section 8.09 of the


Revolving Credit Agreement.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 204 (Thursday, October 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 64053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26869]

[[Page 64053]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Availability for Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) 
for the Proposed Part 139 Operating Certificate and Related Actions and 
Notice for Public Hearing at Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability and notice for public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is announcing the availability of a Draft EA for 
public review and comment. The Draft EA examines the potential 
environmental impacts of proposed actions to initiate commercial 
service and to develop the Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport in 
accordance with the approved Airport Layout Plan. The EA has been 
undertaken in accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
of 1969 and its implementing regulations. Consultants, acting on behalf 
of the Paulding County Airport Authority, have prepared a Draft EA that 
describes the potential environmental impacts associated with the 
proposed initiation of commercial service and other airport improvement 
projects on environmental resources in the area.
    A Public Hearing for the Draft EA will be held on December 1, 2015 
from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Paulding County Northwest Atlanta Airport, 
730 Airport Parkway, Dallas, Georgia 30157.

DATES: The document will be available for public review beginning on 
October 20, 2015. Comments on the document will be accepted until 
December 11, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Any person desiring to review the Draft EA and to comment on 
the document may do so at the following locations: Paulding Northwest 
Atlanta Airport, 730 Airport Parkway, Dallas, Georgia 30157 or Paulding 
County Library, 1010 Memorial Drive East, Dallas, Georgia 30132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Favors, Environmental Program 
Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., Suite 
220, Atlanta, GA 30337-2747, (404) 305-6744, Lisa.Favors@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft EA will also be made available 
online for review and comment via the following Web sites:

Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport: www.pauldingairport.com
Paulding County, Georgia: www.paulding.gov

    Issued in Atlanta, Georgia, on October 15, 2015.
Larry F. Clark,
Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2015-26869 Filed 10-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```