39604 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

E airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at Frank Wiley 

Field Airport, Miles City, MT. The Class 

E surface airspace would be modified to 

a 5-mile radius of Frank Wiley Field 

Airport to support terminal operations 

below 700 feet above the surface and to 

account for rising terrain. Class E 

airspace designated as an extension to 

Class E surface area would be removed 

as there are no Instrument Flight Rules 

(IFR) procedures that require a surface 

extension. Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

would be modified to an 8-mile radius 

of Frank Wiley Field Airport to support 

IFR departures below 1,200 feet above 

the surface due to rising terrain. After a 

review of the airspace, the FAA found 

modification of the airspace necessary 

for the safety and management of IFR 

operations at the airport. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6002, 6004, and 

6005, respectively, of FAA Order 

7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015, and 

effective September 15, 2015, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2015, and 

effective September 15, 2015, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace 

Designated as Surface Areas. 

* * * * * 

ANM MT E2 Miles City, MT [Modified] 

Miles City, Frank Wiley Field, MT 

(Lat. 46°25′41′′ N., long. 105°53′10′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface within a 5-mile radius of Frank Wiley 

Field. 

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas 

Designated as an Extension to a Class D or 

Class E Surface Area. 

* * * * * 

ANM MT E4 Miles City, MT [Removed] 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ANM MT E5 Miles City, MT [Modified] 

Miles City, Frank Wiley Field, MT 

(Lat. 46°25′41′′ N., long. 105°53′10′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within an 8-mile radius 

of Frank Wiley Field and that airspace 

extending upward from 1,200 feet above the 

surface within a 34.5-mile radius of Frank 

Wiley Field. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 7, 

2016. 

Byron Chew, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Western Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2016–14280 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

30 CFR 57, 70, 72, and 75 

[Docket No. MSHA–2014–0031] 

RIN 1219–AB86 

Exposure of Underground Miners to 

Diesel Exhaust 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 2016– 

13219 appearing on pages 36826–36831 

in the issue of Wednesday, June 8, 2016, 

make the following correction: 

1. On page 36826, in the third 

column, in the DATES section, 

‘‘September 1, 2016’’ should read 

‘‘September 6, 2016’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2016–13219 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0280; FRL–9947–80– 

Region 7] 

Approval of Iowa’s State 

Implementation Plan (SIP); Definition 

of Greenhouse Gas and Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) 

Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs) 

Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

two SIP revisions submitted by the State 

of Iowa. First, EPA is proposing to 

approve the definition of greenhouse 

gas, which will make the state’s 

definition consistent with the Federal 

definition, and add greenhouse gases to 

emission inventory requirements. 

Second, EPA is proposing to approve 

Iowa’s revision to its Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) program, 

specifically to the definition of ‘‘subject 

to regulation,’’ and adopt by reference 

the most recent Federal plantwide 

applicability limitations (PALs) 

provisions. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received by July 18, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2016–0280, to http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 39605 

1Specifically, in the February 26, 2016 letter from 

MDE to EPA, MDE withdrew from EPA’s review 

and consideration the text in COMAR 

26.11.01.10.A(4), in COMAR 26.11.01.10.B(4), in 

COMAR 26.11.01.10D(2)(c), and in COMAR 

26.11.01.10.F which had initially been included in 

the November 25, 2015 SIP submittal. 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, the full EPA public comment 

policy, information about CBI or 

multimedia submissions, and general 

guidance on making effective 

comments, please visit http://

www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Heather Hamilton, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

913–551–7039, or by email at 

Hamilton.heather@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document proposes to take action to 

approve the definition of greenhouse 

gas, and add greenhouse gases to 

emission inventory requirements. We 

have published a direct final rule 

approving the State’s SIP revision (s) in 

the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of 

this Federal Register, because we view 

this as a noncontroversial action and 

anticipate no relevant adverse comment. 

We have explained our reasons for this 

action in the preamble to the direct final 

rule. If we receive no adverse comment, 

we will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. If we receive adverse 

comment, we will withdraw the direct 

final rule and it will not take effect. We 

would address all public comments in 

any subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. We do not intend to 

institute a second comment period on 

this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting must do so at this time. For 

further information, please see the 

information provided in the ADDRESSES

section of this document. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Greenhouse gases, 

Incorporation by reference, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: June 3, 2016. 

Mark Hague, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2016–14281 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0042; FRL–9947–84– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Maryland; Revisions and Amendments 

to Regulations for Continuous Opacity 

Monitoring, Continuous Emissions 

Monitoring, and Quality Assurance 

Requirements for Continuous Opacity 

Monitors 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

state implementation plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of Maryland. 

This revision pertains to revisions to 

Maryland regulations for continuous 

opacity monitoring (COM or COMs) and 

continuous emissions monitoring (CEM 

or CEMs) and to an amendment adding 

requirements for Quality Assurance and 

Quality Control (QA/QC) as they pertain 

to COMs. This action is being taken 

under the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before July 18, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03– 

OAR–2016–0042 at http://

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For 

comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 

follow the online instructions for 

submitting comments. Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or removed 

from Regulations.gov. For either manner 

of submission, the EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

confidential business information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

For the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marilyn Powers, (215) 814–2308, or by 

email at powers.marilyn@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 24, 2015, the State of 

Maryland through the Maryland 

Department of the Environment (MDE) 

submitted a revision to the Maryland 

SIP comprised of revisions and 

amendments to COMAR 26.01.01 

General Administrative Requirements 

related to requirements for COMs and 

CEMs and the addition of new COMAR 

26.01.31 Quality Assurance 

Requirements for Continuous Opacity 

Monitors (COMs). On February 26, 2016, 

MDE provided a supplemental letter 

indicating MDE was excluding portions 

of COMAR 26.11.01 submitted in the 

November 24, 2015 SIP submittal from 

EPA’s review and consideration as a SIP 

revision. The February 26, 2016 letter 

from MDE is available in the docket for 

this rulemaking and is available online 

at http://www.regulations.gov.1

I. Background 

On February 28, 1996 (61 FR 6418), 

EPA approved Maryland regulation 

COMAR 26.11.01.10 Continuous 

Emissions Monitoring (CEM) 

Requirements into the Maryland SIP. 

COMAR 26.11.01.10 required large fuelburning equipment burning coal and 

residual oil to install COMs and 

demonstrate compliance using COM 

data. The regulation established 

monitoring requirements, CEM 

installation requirements, CEM 

installation and certification schedules, 

quality assurance procedures for opacity 

monitors, and recordkeeping and 

reporting requirements. The regulation 

incorporated by reference Maryland’s 

Technical Memorandum 90–01 (TM 90), 

and required compliance 

determinations for the State’s visible 

emissions limits and QA/QC for COMs 

in accordance with the procedures 

therein. The terms CEMs and COMs are 

used interchangeably in COMAR 

26.11.01.10, therefore MDE determined 

it was necessary to establish separate 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS