alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-14-00101-CV

In the Matter of the Marriage of Emma Ruth Vinson and Ben Andrew Vinson, Sr.

(No. 2011-12-590-CCL IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF RUSK COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

SUPP REPORTER'S RECORD

SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK'S RECORD

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD

INDIGENT

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 FEE

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

$10.00

$160.00

$65.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$58.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

$20.00

$767.50

E-PAID

UNKNOWN

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

UNKNOWN

MARIAN TAYLOR

JOE SHUMATE

JOE SHUMATE

MARIAN TAYLOR

MARIAN TAYLOR

MARIAN TAYLOR

JOE SHUMATE

JOE SHUMATE

JOE SHUMATE

JOE SHUMATE

JOE SHUMATE

JOE SHUMATE

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

October 21, 2015.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending

July 1 – September 30, 2017

Board 

Approval 

Date

Country Amount Type U.S. Position Background

7/7 Mali SDR 31.65 million

($43.96 million)

Seventh Review Under the 

Extended Credit Facility (ECF) 

and Request for Extension of 

Augmentation

Yes http://www.imf.org/en/P

ublications/CR/Issues/20

17/07/12/Mali-SeventhReview-Under-theExtended-CreditFacility-Arrangementand-Request-forExtension-45072

7/17 Central 

African 

Republic

SDR 11.14 million

($15.5 million)

Second Review Under the 

Extended Credit Facility (ECF), 

Financing Assurances Review, 

and Request for Augmentation 

of Access

Yes http://www.imf.org/en/N

ews/Articles/2017/07/17

/pr17287-imf-executiveboard-completessecond-review-underthe-ecf-arrangement-for

7/20 Greece SDR 1.3 billion

($1.8 billion)

Request for Stand-By 

Arrangement In Principle

Yes http://www.imf.org/en/N

ews/Articles/2017/07/20

/pr17294-greece-imfexecutive-boardapproves-in-principlestand-by-arrangement
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsSendGrid, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-221587) on Form S-8 of our report dated February 26, 2018, with respect to the balance sheets of SendGrid, Inc. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and related notes (collectively, the “financial statements”), which report appears in the December 31, 2017 annual report on Form 10-K of SendGrid, Inc.  

 KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 26, 2018

 

----
# August

# Sheet3
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2285 

To require the Federal Aviation Administration to implement a Government 

Accountability Office recommendation relating to helicopter noise in the 

Washington, DC area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2021 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. BEYER, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. 

BROWN, and Mr. TRONE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Aviation Administration to implement 

a Government Accountability Office recommendation relating to helicopter noise in the Washington, DC area, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington, DC Area 

5 Helicopter Noise Information Exchange Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INFORMATION SHARING REQUIREMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of TransporVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:36 May 26, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2285.IH H2285

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2285 IH

1 tation, acting through the Administrator of the Federal 

2 Aviation Administration, shall establish a mechanism to 

3 make helicopter noise complaint data accessible to the 

4 Federal Aviation Administration and helicopter operators 

5 operating in the Washington, DC area, based on the rec6 ommendation of the Government Accountability Office in 

7 the report published on January 7, 2021, titled ‘‘Aircraft 

8 Noise: Better Information Sharing Could Improve Re9 sponses to Washington, D.C. Area Helicopter Noise Con10 cerns’’. 

11 (b) COOPERATION.—Any helicopter operator oper12 ating in the Washington, DC area shall provide helicopter 

13 noise complaint data to the Federal Aviation Administra14 tion through the mechanism established under subsection 

15 (a). 

16 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

17 (1) HELICOPTER NOISE COMPLAINT DATA.— 

18 The term ‘‘helicopter noise complaint data’’— 

19 (A) means general data relating to a com20 plaint made by an individual about helicopter 

21 noise in the Washington, DC area and may in22 clude— 

23 (i) the location and description of the 

24 event that is the subject of the complaint; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2285 IH

1 (ii) the start and end time of such 

2 event; 

3 (iii) a description of the aircraft that 

4 is the subject of the complaint; and 

5 (iv) the airport name associated with 

6 such event; and 

7 (B) does not include the personally identi8 fiable information of the individual who sub9 mitted the complaint. 

10 (2) WASHINGTON, DC AREA.—The term ‘‘Wash11 ington, DC area’’ means the area inside of a 30-mile 

12 radius of Ronald Reagan Washington National Air13 port. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The Spring General Board Meeting in support of the HQ USAF 
Scientific Advisory Board will meet in Colorado Springs, CO, on April 
22-24, 1998 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to gather information and receive 
briefings for 1998 Summer Study.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.

    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-32225 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
1

SLFRF Program Award Exclusion from Recipient 

Indirect Cost Rate Calculation

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved a request from the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury, Office of Recovery Programs (Treasury ORP) to permit direct State and Local Fiscal 

Recovery Fund (SLFRF) recipients to exclude their SLFRF award, Assistance Listing Number 

21.027, from their direct cost base used to calculate their Federal indirect cost rate. 

Treasury ORP is working with our partners at OMB and the Department of Interior, Interior 

Business Center (DOI IBC) to implement this exception. Treasury ORP recommends that Tribes 

contact DOI IBC with questions about specific rates. DOI IBC can be contacted by email at 

ics@ibc.doi.gov.

An overview of effects of this exception on Tribes as well as background information on indirect 

cost rates can be found below.

How does this exception affect my Tribe?

The exception to exclude SLFRF award funds from SLFRF recipient direct cost bases used to 

calculate their Federal indirect cost rate:

• Promotes stability and continuity for your indirect costs

• Minimizes fluctuations and potential decreases in indirect cost rates due to the 

temporary influx of SLFRF award funds

• Supports your ability to effectively plan what amount of Federal funds you will have 

available for indirect costs

Background Information on Indirect Cost Rates

• Direct costs can be identified with a specific, final cost objective (e.g., federal award, 

funded activity) that can easily be directly assigned to activities associated with an 

award with a high degree of accuracy. For example, program-specific equipment, 

employee salaries, and consultant fees. For more information on direct costs, please see 

2 CFR 200.413.

• Indirect costs are costs incurred for a common or joint purpose that benefits more than 

one federal award or funded activity and are not easy to assign to a specific cost 

objective. For example, general expenses such as printer paper, paper towels, rent for 

office space, and utilities. For more information on indirect costs, please see 2 CFR 

200.1, 2 CFR 200.414, and 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix VII.
2

• An indirect cost rate is the percentage that a recipient can apply across all federal 

awards to determine what portion of their awards they may use to pay for indirect costs 

unless provided otherwise. For example, some Federal awards have limits on the 

amount of award funds that may be used for administrative costs and recipients may 

not be permitted to use an indirect cost rate to charge indirect costs to the awards.

• The DOI IBC is responsible for developing negotiated indirect cost rate agreements

(NICRAs) for Tribes. The indirect cost rate in a Tribe’s NICRA may be used across all 

federal financial assistance awards as permitted by applicable statutes, regulations, and 

policies.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.    /s/Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer    /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  November 6, 2009    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the “Company”) on Form  10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Howard N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











November 13, 2009





/s/ Howard N. Feist III


Howard N. Feist III


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Owen John GRIFFIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 16, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 30, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Mrs. Patricia Garrett RUTLEDGE v. Ray F. GARRETT.

No. 49898.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 17, 1977.

Fair & Mayo, James C. Mayo, Louisville, for appellant.

Frank M. Deramus, Louisville, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Choctaw County; Edward C. Prisock, Chancellor.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Mark Douglas HEINEMANN, Appellant, v. Barbara Woods HEINEMANN, Appellee.

No. M-251.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Nov. 20, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140699

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140699 COA: 289562 Wayne CC: 08-011367-FC PIERRE MARTIN MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2208 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2208

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

Ms. Escobar (for herself and Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-
Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair Opportunity Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes 
of Texas Restoration Act (Public Law 100-89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    ``Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude or limit the 
applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 
seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHAUN RUSHING , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21

- 019 25 (UNA) ) AMERICA , ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court has reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro

se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even p ro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch , 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum st andard of Rule
8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claims being asserted such that they can prepare a responsive answer, prepare an adequate defense, and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano , 75 F.R.D. 49 7, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

The Plaintiff alleges that he forwarded a complaint and lawsuit to then

- President Donald Trump, but that no rebuttal was offered. Compl. at 1. He says this is a violation of due process.2

Id. As drafted, plaintiff’s pro se complaint fails to comply with the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a). There are far too few facts alleged to state a viable legal claim, and certainly too few facts to show an entitlement to an award of $1 1 0 t rillion

. Therefore, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice and will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis

. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: October 12 , 2021

_______________ _______ CARL J. NICHOLS United States District Judge
Exhibit 10.3


 





	
    Ryan Pratt

    Guerrilla RF

    1196 Pleasant Ridge Rd., Suite 5

    Greensboro, NC 27409

    October 28, 2016
	


 


John Berg


3721 Surrey Way Ct.


Winston-Salem, NC 27106


 


Dear John Berg:


 


It is our pleasure to confirm our offer of employment
to you as Chief Financial Officer at Guerrilla RF. In this position, you will report directly to Ryan Pratt beginning Monday December
5, 2016.


 


Your salary will be $36,000.00 per year with paychecks
issued bi-weekly. As the company achieves critical milestones, compensation levels will be adjusted to more market-competitive levels.
In addition to milestone adjustments, you will receive consideration on your hiring date anniversary for normal pay cycle salary increases.


 


Upon starting your employment, you will be granted
Common Stock Options in the amount of 50,000 shares. If you leave Guerrilla RF before one year of continuous employment, the option shares
will revert to the company. After one year, your options will vest at a rate of 25% per year employed.


 


You will be eligible for medical, dental, vision,
disability, and basic life insurance benefits beginning on your first day of employment, most of which are available to employees for
no cost. Guerrilla RF offers a generous Paid-Time-Off (PTO) policy with quarterly company holidays/shutdowns.


 


To confirm your acceptance of this offer of employment, please sign
below and return to me by scan/e-mail atrpratt@guerrilla-rf.com.


 


	 	 	11-2-16
	Signature	 	Date





	 	 	 
	Sincerely,	 	
	 	 	 
	/s/ Ryan Pratt 	 	
	Ryan Pratt	 	 
	Founder, CEO
Treasury approves Tennessee’s plan to invest $185 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Tennessee

 

▪ Program Summary: $185 million for Broadband Infrastructure (86% of CPF allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 50,000 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: Tennessee will implement two

broadband infrastructure programs that aim to provide

reliable internet access in areas of the state lacking

adequate service. Tennessee’s Last Mile Connection

program is a competitive grant program designed to provide

service to remote areas of the state where broadband

infrastructure projects would not be feasible without assistance. Tennessee’s Middle Mile 

Buildout Program is a competitive grant program designed to deploy middle mile 

infrastructure in rural areas of the state to improve and expand last mile connections. 

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

▪ Key State Contact: Tennessee Department of Economic & Community Development (TNECD)

Tennessee Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Tennessee, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~11% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-81-002]


Carnegie Interstate Pipeline; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

February 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 29, 1997, Carnegie Interstate Pipeline 
Company (CIPCO) tendered for filing the following revised tariff sheets 
to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, with a proposed 
effective date February 1, 1996:

Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 7
First Revised Sheet No. 141
First Revised Sheet No. 141A
First Revised Sheet No. 142

    CIPCO states that filing implements the settlement approved by the 
Commission in a letter order issued January 15, 1997. The filing 
terminates CIPCO's Transportation Cost Rate tracker mechanism and 
implements the settlement.
    CIPCO states that copies of its filing were served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the public 
reference room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3148 Filed 2-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ballard *v.*Steele & Sons Co., Appellant.

Argued October 26, 1933.

*Thomas G. Egan,*and with him *Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Gohen,*for appellant.

*559*Nathan Lavine,*and with him *Herbert W. Sains,*for appellees.

April 16, 1934:

Opinion by

James, J.,

This appeal involves the same questions as raised by appellant in the case of Luther McGowan v. William Steele & Sons Company, Appellant, 112 Pa. Superior Ct. 552, in which an opinion has been filed this day.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment is affirmed.