alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles T. PEERS, Appellant, v. A. J. TURK and Car-Mel Chemicals, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-626.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 19, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Maurice M. Paul, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
AALEGAL 817963495 9 09/2 0 '1 1 09:0 8 NO.29 4 01/0 2

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N A^vf^n^^^^^^^ ^ FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMIN'ISTRATIO N ,t'!iv^^\Vn-nA^

FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATION ,

Complamaji t V . AMERICA N EAGL E AIRLINES , INC. ,

Responden t FAA Civi l Penalty 2008SW2]W9] P ' ' '•'* ^ FA A Docke t No . No t ye t asisigne d FDM S No . FAA-20 1 ].-029 ( Administrativ e Law Judg e Hon . Richar dC , Goodwi n Septembe r

20 , 20] ] REQUES T T O WTTIiDRA WTH E REQUES T FO RA HJJ:ARIN G

AND TH E ANSWE RT O TH E COMPLAIN T Pursuan t t o §13.215 , tli e Respondent , b y counsel , Request s t o "Witlidra w th e Reques t

fo r a Hearin g andtli e AiDSwe

r t o tli e Complain t

cancelin g any nee dfor

ahearin g se t

fo r tiii s matter . Th e basi s o f

thi s motio n i s that

th e Administrato r

an dRespondent . Uirougl

i counsel , hav e reache d asettlement . Respectfull y submitte dth e 20th da y o f Septembe r

20 ] L

American Eagl e Airlines , Inc .

Bv : Franci s C . Hei l Senio r Attorne y for American Eagl e Airline s P.O . 3ox6I96l 6 Mai ) Dro p 567 5 DF WAirport , T

X 75261-961 6 Telephone : 202-496-564 2 Facsimile : 202-496-566 0AALEGA L 817963495 9 09/2 0 '1 1 09:0 9 NO.29 4 02/0 2 CERTHi^lCAT E O FSERVIC E T hereb y certif

y tha t today , Septembe r

20 . 2011 , I hav e sen t

b y Facsimil e an

dU.S . Mail tli e foregoin g Motio n t o Wilhdra^ ! the Reques t fo r aHearin g aii dth e Answer to fh e Complain t

i n th e matte r o f FAA v . American Eagl e Airlines , Inc. , t o th e following : ON E COP Y Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwi n Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportation , Rm . EI2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Telephone : Facsimile : 202-366-213 9

202-366-753 6 Ren aPrice , Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Admiriistratio n Offic e o f th e Regional Counse l (ASW-7 ) Southwes t

Regio n Headquarter s 260 1 MeachamBlvd. , Rm . 66 3 For t Worth , Texa s 7613 7 Telephone : Facsimile : 817-222-506 8

817-222-594 5

ORICrNA L & ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building , Suite 2W100 0 Facsimile : 202-493-514 2

is aPaparell i Paralegal for America n Easl e Airline s Telephone : SI7-967-129 9 Facsimile : 817-967-293 7
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan totaling $1,186,900 to oVio 

Technologies, Inc. (the Company), a business critical to maintaining national security with

approximately six U.S. employees in March 2020.

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(3) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is unsecured. It has an annual interest rate equal to 

LIBOR plus 5.5% and matures on October 31, 2025. Treasury funded the full loan amount at 

close. The loan proceeds will be used to provide liquidity to continue the Company’s operations. 

The transaction agreement includes covenants by the Company to comply with certain 

restrictions on employee compensation, stock repurchases, dividends, and reductions in 

employment levels, as required by the CARES Act. The loan constitutes senior indebtedness of 

the Company, and Treasury will receive 3% payment-in-kind annual interest on the loan in 

accordance with section 4003(d) of the CARES Act.
#### Jill WEISSMAN, Appellant, v. Donald RAY and Steakthing Restaurant Corporation, d/b/a Les Jardins, Appellee.

No. 77-1794.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1978.

Levy & Cohen, Miami, for appellant.

Goodwin, Ryskamp, Welcher & Carrier, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ., and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Wright,*342 So.2d 503 (Fla.1977).
#### Edward D. FEURTADO, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41063.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          49,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,427
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,078,892
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,111,675
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,049,679)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,427
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   207
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  449,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (490,788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (490,788)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (490,788)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Table 1. Foreigners’ Transactions in Long-Term Securities with U.S. Residents

(Billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted)

12 Months Through

2002 2003 Feb-03 Feb-04 Nov-03 Dec-03 Ja

1 Gross Purchases of Domestic Securities 13,022.9 15,726.4 13,157.7 16,546.7 1,171.1 1,198.8 1,32 Gross Sales of Domestic Securities 12,475.4 14,981.4 12,585.8 15,682.1 1,088.7 1,118.0 1,23 Domestic Securities Purchased, net (line 1 less line 2) /1 547.6 745.0 572.0 864.6 82.4 80.8 1

4 Private, net /2 508.3 605.6 507.9 690.1 61.5 64.5 5 Treasury Bonds & Notes, net 112.8 163.7 103.8 211.2 14.6 18.4 6 Gov't Agency Bonds, net 166.6 137.9 177.1 157.4 9.3 12.9 7 Corporate Bonds, net 176.7 266.1 191.2 263.1 28.7 19.7 8 Equities, net 52.2 37.9 35.9 58.5 8.9 13.5 9 Official, net 39.3 139.4 64.0 174.5 20.9 16.3 

10 Treasury Bonds & Notes, net 7.1 109.3 23.1 145.3 18.9 11.3 11 Gov't Agency Bonds, net 28.6 24.9 36.7 24.7 1.3 4.4 12 Corporate Bonds, net 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.5 0.9 0.7 13 Equities, net -2.0 -0.4 -1.4 -0.9 -0.2 -0.1 14 Gross Purchases of Foreign Securities 2,640.0 3,532.9 2,691.2 3,890.4 315.3 310.4 315 Gross Sales of Foreign Securities 2,613.0 3,577.3 2,670.4 3,936.4 319.8 315.3 316 Foreign Securities Purchased, net (line 14 less line 15) /3 27.0 -44.4 20.8 -46.1 -4.5 -4.9 17 Foreign Bonds Purchased, net 28.5 26.6 34.7 29.0 -3.6 0.1 18 Foreign Equities Purchased, net -1.5 -71.0 -13.9 -75.1 -0.9 -5.0 -19 Net Long-Term Flows (line 3 plus line 16) 574.6 700.6 592.8 818.5 77.9 75.9 

/1 Net foreign purchases of U.S. securities (+)/2 Includes International and Regional Organizations/3 Net U.S. acquisitions of foreign securities (-)Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury.
R.TE D HARHAl , MEMBE R

3 2 EAS TWIN G P O BO X20205 8 HARRISBUR G PA17120-205 8 PHONE : (717 ) 772-282 0 FAX : (717 ) 772-074 5 COMMITTEE S

MONESSE N OFFIC E 1 20 0 MAROND AWA Y SUIT E 40 1 MONESSE N PA1 506 2 PHONE : (724 1 684-293 9 FAX : (724 ) 684-661 3 HOUS E O F REPRESENTATIVE S COMMONWEALT H O F PENNSYLVANI A

HARRISBUR G Jul y19 , 2011 TRANSPORTATIO N ENVIRONMENTA LRESOURCE S AN D ENERG Y- MAJORIT YSUBCOMMITTE E CHAI R O N MININ G LIQUO R CONTRO L LOCA LGOVERNMEN T- MAJORIT YSUBCOMMITTE E O N BOROUGH S HOUS E MAJORIT YPOLIC Y COMMITTE E

:-:!- H

-—;,—,.— N / A^

. J ^-— HERMINI E OFFIC E 30 8 SEWICKLE YAVENU E HERMINI E P A1536 7 PHONE

. (724 ) 446-428 8 FAX : (724)446-428 9 Aloh a Le y Associat e Directo r Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Program , X-5 5 U

. S

. Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , SE Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 C D Dea rMs

. Ley : I a m writin g t o len d m ysupport t o th e Westmorelan d Count yAirport Authority' s reques t fo rfundin g throug h th e U.S

. Departmen t o fTransportation' s Smal l Communit yAi r Servic e Developmen t progra m t o expan d th e schedule d ai rservic e tha tha s show n phenomena l promis e at Arnol d Palme rRegiona l Airport

. Th e authorit yha s see n dramati csucces s wit h th e launc h o fSpiri t Airline s servic e t o For t Lauderdale , F Lan d Myrtl e Beach , SC , movin g mor e tha n 30,00 0 passenger s throug h Arnol d Palme rRegiona l i n les s tha n fiv e months

. Loa d factor s hav e prove n unprecedente d a t th e airport , averagin g i n th e hig h 80 % an d mi d 90 % ranges
. Th e airtin e i s no wconsiderin g additiona l destination s t o augmen t thi s thrivin g operation , an d ask s onl yfo rassistanc e i n marketin g th e ne wroutes

. Thes e effort s ar e heavil ydependen t upo n marketin g effort s tha t th e airlin e ha s prove n successful

. Gran t fundin g throug h th e SCAS D progra m i s critica l t o supportin g thes e effort s t o expan d servic e an d bolsterin g a priceles s economi casse t t o th e communitie s th e airport serves
. You rfavorabl e revie wo fthi s applicatio n woul d b e greatl yappreciated

. Should yo u wis h t o discus s thi s further , pleas e d o no thesitat e t o contac tme
. Sincerely , /

State-^^epreserTjtative Te d Harha i S^r * Legislatiy^Distric t
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         151,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,171,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 27,137,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,993,767
<PP&E>                                      36,431,664
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,608,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,516,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,642,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       754,218
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,564,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,516,506
<SALES>                                    116,102,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           116,102,995
<CGS>                                       99,459,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              111,311,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (297,413)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,090,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,998,519
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,400,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,598,519
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,598,519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
Treasury approves Arkansas’ plan to invest $150.2 million of CPF funding 

in broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-speed internet 

to locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Arkansas

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $150.2 million for Broadband Infrastructure (100% of program

allocation)*

 Locations to Be Served: 35,000 (estimated)

 Program Description: The Arkansas Rural Connect (ARC)

grant program is a competitive grant program designed to

fund broadband infrastructure projects in locations

throughout Arkansas without reliable internet of at least

100/20 Mbps. Areas in Arkansas eligible for CPF funding

through this program are generally less densely populated, 

more rural and have higher numbers of socioeconomically disadvantaged residents. CPF 

investments will support the state’s goal of closing the digital divide.

‒ ARC is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps symmetrical to 

households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by ARC will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: Arkansas Economic Development Commission, Broadband Office

Arkansas Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Arkansas, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve 5% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

*Treasury first approved $47.5 million on August 30, 2022, and an additional $103.2 million on October 7, 2022.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Prior year data wa restated to reflect pooling of interests merger effective
December 29, 1997. Also, Primary EPS represents Basic EPS under new SFAS 128.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999             JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1998             OCT-03-1997
<CASH>                                          40,675                  41,412
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,662                  90,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,785                   1,845
<INVENTORY>                                     68,627                  64,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,488                 202,904
<PP&E>                                         138,455                 105,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,729                  45,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,125                 313,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,490                  90,606
<BONDS>                                         46,281                  56,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        83,169                  66,425
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,917                  80,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,125                 313,298
<SALES>                                        393,584                 379,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               393,584                 379,085
<CGS>                                          291,319                 277,439
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  291,319                 277,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,982                  58,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,069                   3,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,208                  40,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,797                  12,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,411                  27,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                 (2,062)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,411                  25,834
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45                    0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42                    0.64
        


</TABLE>
Public Service Company of New HampshireExhibit 12Ratio of Earnings to Fixed ChargesThree Months(Thousands of Dollars)EndedMarch 31, 2009For the Years Ended December 31,(unaudited)20082007200620052004Earnings, as defined:Net income$17,495$58,067$54,434$35,323$41,739$46,641Income tax expense7,50621,99622,79439,18312,23412,993Equity in (earnings)/losses of regional nucleargenerating companies(18)(62)(343)74(230)(165)Dividends received from regional equity investees220-521367172614Fixed charges, as below13,78154,59750,63750,09249,75147,211Less: Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)(860)(2,967)(2,985)(2,768)(1,896)(272)Total earnings, as defined$38,124$131,631$125,058$122,271$101,770$107,022Fixed charges, as defined:Interest on long-term debt (a)$8,104$32,655$26,029$24,100$20,481$17,441Interest on rate reduction bonds3,65815,96918,01320,82824,07426,901Other interest (b)7921,5392,2438291,7331,197Rental interest factor3671,4671,3671,5671,5671,400Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)8602,9672,9852,7681,896272Total fixed charges, as defined$13,781$54,597$50,637$50,092$49,751$47,211Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges2.772.412.472.442.052.27(a)
Interest on long-term debt amounts include amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness.(b)
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, other interest includes interest related to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109."
#### Michael P. PAALAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-5108.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 2, 2002.

Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*495ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The United States moves to dismiss Michael P. Paalan’s appeal because he has appealed from a nonfinal order. Paalan opposes.

Paalan filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging four claims for military back pay and other compensation pursuant to different theories based on various statutory, regulatory and constitutional provisions, and a claim for compensation for alleged takings under the Fifth Amendment. The United States moved to dismiss and Paalan moved for summary judgment and discovery. On March 4, 2002, the trial court granted the United States’ motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part, denied Paalan’s motion for summary judgment, and granted Paalan’s motion for discovery in part. The trial court concluded, in part:

> Because [the United States’] motion to dismiss is granted only in part, [Paal-an’s] claims survive as follows: (1) whether plaintiff received military pay pursuant to 37 U.S.C. § 204(a)(1) and DODPM § 10317(d) between October 11, 1995, and November 28, 1995; and (2) whether the Government’s continued retention of plaintiffs personal property, with the exception of his gun and ammunition, constitutes a compensable taking under the Fifth Amendment.

On April 22, 2002, Paalan filed a notice of appeal.

The United States argues that the Court of Federal Claim’s order is nonfinal and not appealable because some of Paalan’s back pay and takings claims remain pending before the Court of Federal Claims. We agree. Because the March 4, 2002 order disposed of only some of Paalan’s claims, leaving other matters unadjudicated, the trial court’s decision is not final and appealable. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. *Cf. Aleut Tribe v. United States,*702 F.2d 1015, 1020 (Fed.Cir.1983) (“An appeal from an order that disposes of only some claims of an action may *not*be made without waiting for a decision on the remainder of the case, unless the requirements of Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are met.”) (emphasis in original).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The United States’ motion to dismiss is granted.*

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

 The court notes that Paalan's appeal could also be dismissed in light of his failure to pay the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
#### In re ESTATE of Garrett Edwin VAN METER, Deceased. Lucille VAN METER, Widow, Richard M. Robbins, as Administrator c. t. a. of Estate of Garrett Edwin Van Meter, Petitioners, v. Garrett Oliver VAN METER, Respondent.

No. 37964.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 11, 1970.

C. E. Ware and R. Grable Stoutamire, of Ware & Stoutamire, Clearwater, for petitioners.

Edmund S. Whitson, Jr., of Baker, Whit-son & Stewart, Clearwater, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is a homestead law matter. The decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, 214 So.2d 639 (1968), adequately discloses the pertinent facts.

After hearing oral argument, and after considering the briefs and the record arising out of this cause, we have come to the conclusion that the District Court properly decided the case. The judgment of the District Court is, therefore, approved and the writ heretofore issued is hereby discharged. .

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

THORNAL, J., agrees to conclusion discharging writ.

BOYD, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-344-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

November 25, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on Wednesday, December 10, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. and 
Thursday, December 11, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, for the purposes of exploring the possible 
settlement of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, please contact Kathleen M. Dias at 
(202) 208-0524 or Michael D. Cotleur at (202) 208-1076.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31481 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M