alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# FILED
July 30, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEA LS OF TENNESSEE AT NA SHVILLE JULIUS GOODMA

N, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-97 12-CR-00562 Appellant , ) ) DAVIDSON COUNTY VS. ) (No . 25 09 B elow ) ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) The Hon. Seth Norman ) Appellee. ) (Habeas Corpus) ) DISMISSED O R D E R This matter is before the Court upon the state ’s motion to affirm the judgment pursuantto Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules. After reviewi ng the record, the state’s motion, and the appellant’s brief, we find that the above-styled appeal should be dismissed

. The appellant

filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus on October 1, 1996. Subsequently, counsel was appoi nted, and an am ended pet ition was filed on J anuary 15, 1997. A hearing was held on November 1 0, 1997, and through counsel, the appellant withdrew his petition. Thereafter, the appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

In his brief, the appellant indicatesthat his attorney misrepres ented to the trial

court that he wished to wi

thdraw the petition. R

egardless, it appears that the appellant subsequently filed
a petition i n the crimin al court of Johnson County, Tennessee , and is seeking to appeal as of right from the adver se decision in Johns on County.

Pursuantto T.R.A.P. 4(a), the notice of appeal shall be file

d with and receiv

ed by the clerk of the trial court wi thin 30 days after the

date of entry of the judgment from which i s being appealed. The notice of appe al cannot be filed wi

th the trial court clerk of one county in order

to appeal from the jud gment of a court from another county. In the p resent case, the petition for habeas corpus re lief was wi thdr awn in Da vidson Co unty before the trial co urt acted upo n it. Moreover, from the appellant’s brief, it is clear that he is attempting to appeal from proceedings in Johnson Cou nty, and tho se proceedi ngs are not pr operly be

fore us to rev

iew.

IT IS, THEREF ORE, ORD ERED that th e above-sty led appeal

is dismiss

ed. It appearing that the appellant is indigent, costs are tax ed to the state.

_______________________ _________ DAVID H. WELLES,JUDGE CONCUR:

_______________________ _________ JERRY L. SM ITH, JUDGE-2-

_______________________ _________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, J UDGE
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30,  2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Gidwitz, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph J. Sum, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350, of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to our knowledge:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.

 

Date: February 8, 2013

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/  James   G. Gidwitz            |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | James   G. Gidwitz                           |
|   |   | Chairman   of the Board and                  |
|   |   | Chief   Executive Officer                    |
|   |   |                                         |
|   |   |                                         |
|   | By:    | /s/  Joseph   J. Sum               |
|   |   | Joseph   J. Sum                              |
|   |   | Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Continental Materials Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesG. Gidwitz, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and I, Joseph J. Sum, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350, of Chapter63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to our knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company for the periods presented in the Report.

 

 

July30, 2010

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/    James  G. Gidwitz |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | James  G. Gidwitz                            |
|   |   | Chairman  of the Board and                   |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer                     |
|   |   |                                         |
|   |   |                                         |
|   | By:    | /s/    Joseph  J. Sum    |
|   |   | Joseph  J. Sum                               |
|   |   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Amir Loberman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of D. Medical Industries Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 30, 2012





/s/ Amir Loberman

Amir Loberman

Chief Financial Officer
#### Richard A. WOOD, Appellant, v. Josephine P. WOOD, now Josephine P. White, Appellee.

No. 72-1015.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 17, 1973.

Oppenheimer, Dombrowsky & Canner, Miami, for appellant.

Adams, George & Wood, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant husband urges that a modification of a judgment dissolving a marriage by increasing the amount of child support was unfair and unreasonable because there was no substantial change in circumstances. See Andary v. Andary, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 687. However, appellant overlooks a provision of Fla.Stat. 61,13(1), F.S.A., which is governing in this instance.1 The legislature, by the language of this section, has broadened the basis upon which a modification may be *15awarded. The trial judge expressly found as follows: “ . . . that it is necessary for the best interests of the minor children of the parties to modify the Final Judgment herein . . . ”.

Affirmed.

1

. “61.13 Custody and support of children, etc., power of court in making orders.— (1) * * *

> “The court initially entering an order requiring one or both parents to make child support payments shall have continuing jurisdiction after the entry of such initial order to modify the amount of the child support payments, or the terms thereof, when such is found to be necessary by the court for the best interests of the child or children, or when such is found to be necessary by the court because there has been a substantial change in the circumstances of the parties.”

> S)« * * Ijt *
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Krossbow Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period year March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason Krupp, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 20, 2011                   /s/ Jason Kropp
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Jason Kropp
                                      President, Chief Executive Officer, and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2378 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2378

     To amend title 10, United States Code, to reiterate that the 
prohibition against the collection from tenants of privatized military 
  housing units of amounts in addition to rent includes supplemental 
    payments to recover costs associated with unit modifications or 
   upgrades needed to comply with standards under the Americans with 
                       Disabilities Act of 1990.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

   Mrs. Bice of Oklahoma (for herself and Ms. Jacobs of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 10, United States Code, to reiterate that the 
prohibition against the collection from tenants of privatized military 
  housing units of amounts in addition to rent includes supplemental 
    payments to recover costs associated with unit modifications or 
   upgrades needed to comply with standards under the Americans with 
                       Disabilities Act of 1990.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Military Families with 
Disabilities Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION AGAINST COLLECTION FROM TENANTS OF 
              PRIVATIZED MILITARY HOUSING UNITS OF AMOUNTS IN ADDITION 
              TO RENT.

    Section 2891a(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) Costs incurred to modify or upgrade a housing unit to comply 
with standards under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 
U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and facilitate occupancy of the housing unit by 
an individual with a disability (as defined in section 3 of such Act 
(42 U.S.C. 12102)) may not be considered optional services under 
paragraph (2)(A)(i) or another exception to the prohibition in 
paragraph (1) against collection from tenants of housing units of 
amounts in addition to rent.''.
                                 <all>
```
| NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                 | JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
| Direct Subsidiaries:                               |                         |
| IntraLinks, Inc.                                   | Delaware                     |
|                                               |                         |
| Indirect Subsidiaries:                             |                         |
| IntraLinks International Holdings LLC              | Delaware                     |
| IntraLinks EMEA Holdings B.V.                      | Netherlands                  |
| IntraLinks Pty Limited                             | Australia                    |
| IntraLinks Goudou Kaisha                           | Japan                        |
| IntraLinks Ltd.                                    | England and Wales            |
| IntraLinks Serviços De Informática Ltda. | Brazil                       |
| IntraLinks GmbH                                    | Germany                      |
| IntraLinks EMEA France SARL                        | France                       |
| IntraLinks Spain S.L.U.                            | Spain                        |

----
U.S. Position on AfDB’s Kumba-Mamfe Road Development project in Cameroon 

November 21, 2012 

The United States remains very supportive of the Bank’s investment in transport 

infrastructure in the central African countries. In this particular instance, however, the 

United States has some concerns about the impact this project will have on the local 

environment and the AfDB’s/Cameroonian authorities’ ability to mitigate against it. 

The United States is concerned that the environmental impact assessment (EIA) does not 

adequately analyze the direct and cumulative impacts and project alternatives. In particular, 

the United States believes that impacts on biodiversity are not sufficiently analyzed and did 

not find the analysis on noise, water quality or impact on the protect areas to be rigorous 

enough. Given the sensitive ecosystems and endangered species in the near vicinity, this is 

all the more important. While mitigation measures are proposed, the United States is 

concerned that they will not prove adequate enough. Capacity building and strong political 

will are needed as well to ensure that these mitigation measures have the intended impact. 

While the United States is a strong supporter of using feeder roads to stimulate rural 

productivity, it would have liked to have seen an environmental assessment of the impacts 

of those roads, particularly given the tropical forest environment. Furthermore, the United 

States expected a greater analysis of or comment on the environmental impact of the 

increased economic activity that is expected given that palm oil plantations and other 

agricultural expansion will likely increase with improved road networks to markets. 

Despite some mitigation measures, the United States is concerned about a possible increase

in poaching, and urges the Bank and the authorities to be sensitive to this risk. The United 

States recommends that an effort be made to measure the amount of illegal poaching now, at 

the end of the project and five years afterwards, so that appropriate mitigating measures can 

be put in place, based on statistical information. 

While the United States remains fully committed to the infrastructure needs of Cameroon 

and all African countries, it is concerned that in this instance the environmental 

consequences were not adequately analyzed. The United States cannot support, therefore, 

this project; it abstains on this project, in keeping with existing legislative mandates.
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan totaling $3,069,700 to Wiser 

Imagery Services, LLC (the Company), a business critical to maintaining national security with

approximately 135 U.S. employees in March 2020.

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(3) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is unsecured. It has an annual interest rate equal to 

LIBOR plus 5.5% and matures on October 30, 2025. Treasury funded the full loan amount at 

close. The loan proceeds will be used to provide liquidity to continue the Company’s operations. 

The transaction agreement includes covenants by the Company to comply with certain 

restrictions on employee compensation, stock repurchases, dividends, and reductions in 

employment levels, as required by the CARES Act. The loan constitutes senior indebtedness of 

the Company, and Treasury will receive 3% payment-in-kind annual interest on the loan in 

accordance with section 4003(d) of the CARES Act.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0013 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 4 6 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
EXHIBIT 10.58

| 1.   | Subsection      1.a.ii. shall be revised in its entirety to read as    follows: |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Subsection      1.a.iii. shall be deleted and subsections 1.a.iv. and 1.a.v. shall be      renumbered as subsections 1.a.iii. and 1.a.iv.,    respectively; |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Subsection      2.b. shall be amended in its entirety to read as  follows: |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   CPICorp. |                                  |
|--------|----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                 |                                  |   |
|   | By:                  | /s/Turner      White                  |   |
|   |                 | Turner      White                     |   |
|   |                 | Chairman,      Compensation Committee |   |
|   |                 |                                  |   |
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2365 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work in honor of Gold Star Families, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2365 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Mothers 

3 Family Monument Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT 

5 OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK. 

6 Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United 

7 Sates Code, the authority provided by section 2859 of the 

8 Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

9 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2164; 

10 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) shall continue to apply through Jan11 uary 2, 2027. 

12 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

13 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

14 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

15 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

16 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

17 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

18 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro19 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

20 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2365 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for the establishment of a 

ilies, and for other purposes. commemorative work in honor of Gold Star Fam-
EXHIBIT 32.1

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Foundation Medicine, Inc. (Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certifies to his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), the following:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated in the Report.



/s/ Troy CoxTroy CoxChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ Jason RyanJason RyanChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: March 30, 2017

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Foundation Medicine, Inc. and will be
retained by Foundation Medicine, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.