.-'


### DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH DIVISIONOFENVIRONMENTALHEALTH BAQE-039-91 BureauorAHQualltv );onnanH.Bangerter 1950WestNormTemOle GoYen>oT :>O.Box 16690 SuzanneDandoy.M.D

..M.P.H. £.xccut1vr**Dl~** SaltLakeC'lv.Ulan84 16·,)690 Kennel"L.Alkema (801)536-4000 Director (801)536-4099FAX 

### February 7, 1991

James R. 

### Van Orman Director, Environmental Management Department of the Air Force Headquarters Ogden Air 

### Logistics Center Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056-5990

Re: .A.pproval Order for Building 1701

- Dip Tank, Bake Oven. ?aint Booths Davis Count.y CDS**.~1**


### Dear Mr. Van Orman: The above-referenced project has been evaluated and found to be consistent wi

### th the requirements of the UtahAir Conserva.tionRegulations (UACR) and the Utah Air Conservation Act. A30-day public comment. period was held and all comments received were evaluated. The conditions of this approval order reflect any changes to the proposed conditions which resulted from the evaluation of the comments received. This air quality approval order authorizes the project with the following conditions and failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of this order:
2.. 

### Hill Air**~orce** 

### Base, located i:l 

### Davis County, shall make the following changes according to the information submitted in the notice of intent datedApril 27, 1990, and a letter from Hill Air Force Base dated December 21, 1990: A. The owner/operator shall install a dip tank, 370 gallon capacity cylindrical tank, with dimensions of 4 

### feet in diameter and 4 feet high. The tank shall be equipped with a sealed clam-type lid, 

### an outside pump :or agitation, an electric heater, and a cover with a vent. 

### B. The ownerioperator shall remove paint booth 

### Hi and replace itwith a Devilbiss Model ASEY-914-34 paint spray booth or equivalent. Equivalency shall be determined by**~he** 

### Executive Secretary. The booth shall be equipped**~ith** 

### dry paint arrestor filters.



### 4.2.4-848

### JamesR. Van Orman January 31. 1991 Page 2



## e. The owner/operator shall remove paint booth #3 

### and replace it with two end-to-end paint spray booths. The booths shall be equipped with dry paint arrestor filters and High Volume Low Pressure (HVLP) type spray guns. 

### D. The owner/operator shall remove the electric powered bake oven and replace it with an oven fired by natural gas with a total heat input rate not to exceed**t~o** 

### million BTU/hr. 2. 

### Visible emissions :=om any point or fugitive emission source associated with the above emission points shall not exceed 10Z opacity. Opacity observation of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted in**a~cordance** 

### with 40 CFR 60. Appendix A. 

### Method 9. 

### 3. 

### The**follo~ing** 

### operation limits for the bake oven shall not be exceeded without prior cpproval in accordance with Section 3.1. UACR:
A. 

### 2.2 million sci of natural gas per 12 

### month period B. 2.0 million BTU/hr heat input C. 8 

### hours per day 

### D. 1000 hours of operation per 12 

### month period Compliance with the annual limitations shall be determined on a rolling monthly total. On the first day of eachmonth a new 12­ month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. Records of production shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of production shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his representative upon request and shall include a period of**t~o** 

### years ending with the date of the request. Fuel consumption for the bake oven shall be determined by the use of records from a fuel meter. Hours of operation shall be determined by supervisor monitoring and maintaining of an operations log.
4. 

### The total 

### vae emissions from sources listed in this approval order shall not exceed 4.70 

### tons per 12-month period**~i** 

### thout prior approval in accordance with Section 3.1. 

### UACR. Compliance with the limitation shall be determined using a material balance procedure on a rolling monthly total. On the first day of each month a new 12-month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. The total 

### vac emissions shall be determined by ;naintaininga record of paints. varnishes. thinners. and solvents used. and of operation**~ara~eters** 

### from other affected VOC emissions sources. The recort shall include the following data for each item used: 

### 4.2.4-849

### jamesR. Van Orman January 31. 1991 Page 3

A. Name of paint. varnish, thinner. or solvent B. Weight in pounds per gallon 

## e. Percent 

## vae by weight D. Amount used on a daily basis Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of consumption shall be made available to the Executive Secretary upon request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. The

## voe emissions frompaints/thinners shall not exceed 4.69 tons per 12 month period, The 

## vae emissions from other processes shall not exceed 0.01 tons per 12 month period. Voc emissions shall be determined by the following manner: 

## vae = (% 

### Volatile by Weight 

### I 100) 

### * (Density**l~/gal)** 

### * (Gallons Consumed) / (2,000 Ib/ton) The 

## vae content**~n** 

### pounds for each individual item or surface coating used shall be calculated. and then the total of all items shall be summed, such that the cumulative total shall not exceed the 4.69 tons per 12 month period as specified. S. All paint spray booths shall be equipped with a set of paint arrestorparticulate filters orequivalentto controlparticulate emissions. All air exiting any booth shall pass through a paint arrestor control system before being vented to the**a~osphere.** 

### Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary. 6. The owneri

### operator shall operate the dip tank i:1 

### following manner: A. The cover shall remain closed at all times except during actual loading. unloading, or transfer operations. B. Parts shall be completely drained in the internal draining rack until all dripping ceases. C. Waste orused varnish shall be stored**i~** 

### covered containers and disposed by a method which prevents 

## vae emissions to the atmosphere. D. Tanks, containers, and all associated equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition, and leaks shall be repaired immediately. E. Writtenprocedures for the operationand maintenance of the dip tank shall be posted in an accessible and apparent location near the equipment. 

### 4.2.4-850

### James R. Van Orman January 31, 1991 Page 4 7. Eighteen months from the date of this approval order the Executive Secretary shall be notified inwriting of the status of construction of this project unless the construction 

### is complete and operation has commenced. 8. Acopy of this approval order shall be posted on site and shall be available to the employees who operate the air emission producing equipment. All employees who operate the air emission producing equipment shall receive instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment in compliance with the appropriate and relevant conditions. 9. All installations and facil.ities authorized by this approval order shall be adequately and properly maintained. 10. The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon startup of the installation. as an initial compliance inspection is required. Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance wit Section 3.1.1. UACR.

,- This approval order in no way releases the. owner or operator from any liability for compliance with all other applicable federal. state. and local regulations including the Utah

### Air conservation Regulations. Annual emissions for sources listed in this approval order are calculated at 0.01 tons/yr for particulates. 0.01 tons/yr for PM10• 

### 0.0006 tons/yr for S02' 

### 0.10 tons/yr for NOx' 

### 0.02 tons/yr for CO. and 4.70 

### tons/yr for VOC. These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of PSD and nonattainment area major source requirements of the UACR. Except for 

## vac. :,,:"..:.j c:..':

__**r~** ....· ... _....**~..,; ~.:;cu**  :01:" 

### p**-~ost:s** vi**c...t:L:i'rrU:":'~"6 c,.h..i..~_':"'c.ilC~.**  

### Sincerely,

# t~~r~~Cutive Secretary Utah Air Conservation Committee FBC:TB:jiw

cc: EPA Region VIII. Mike Owens Davis County Health Department**,~.**


### 4.2.4-851DEPARTMENTOFTHEAIR FORCE HEADQUARTERSOGDENAIR LOGISTICSCENTER (AFLC) ,HIJ..L.AIR FORCEBASE, UTAH 84056-5990
... ''''''''- -**"~"".** ---" '.,**~.s.'.":'**..**-:.._.:.:.:=_,~** '"::;"

- .' .". _.:, 

# - RECEIVED /]/

## '\ Mr F Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary 

# DEC2'1' 1990 Bureau of Air Quality 1950 West North Temple AIR QUALITY 

### PO Box 16690 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-0690 RE: Public comments on Intent to Approve building 1701. Dip Tank, Bake Oven 

### & Paint Booths. Dear Mr Cordner Referenced"Intent::'w"A:ppro'Q'e"

### dated 7 Dec 90. we offer the following public comments for your consideration Condition 1.A.

- Per our 18 Oct 90 letter, dual wall dip tank shall be 370 gallon capacity measuring approximately 4 feet inside diameter and 4 feet high, The tank will be located above ground. therefore, cathodic protection will not be provided, The tank will be provided wiLh a sealed clam type lid. outside pump liquid circulating Lype agitation, elecLric heater and a vent system. Condition 4 - Our estimation of VOC emissions from sources listed in this Intent to Approve is 3.28 tons per year, Revised VOC evaporative emissions from the dip tank are as follows: Uncontrolled AP-42 Emission Factor 0.15 Lb VaC/Hr, Ft2 

### Evaporative area (revised) 3,14 X (4)2 = 

### 12.56 Ft2 4 

### Operating hours about 1,000 hrsjYr Uncontrolled evaporative losi .15 Lb X 12,56 Ft2 

### X 1,000 hrs XTon hr, Ft2 

### 2,000 Lbs
= 

### 0,94 Ton/Yr Emission Reduction Factor 30-60% use 40% Evaporative VOC emissions 0,94 X ,6 = 

### ,56 Ton/Yr Dip tank usage Loss (NOI) .06 Ton/Yr Paint booth #1 VOC emissions**(~OI)** 

### ,12 + 

### ,34 = 

### ,46 Ton/Yr Baking Oven VOC emissions (NOI) .12 Ton/Yr Paint booth #3 VOC emissions (NOI) 2,08 Tons/Yr Total VOC emissions 0,56 + 

### ,06 + 

### ,46 + 

### .12 + 

### 2,08 3,28 Tons/Yr If you have any questions, please feel free to contacL Jay Gupta at 777-6917, Sincerely,

# 1~n9

.,:'\:Vi

## ESN. J**Nl(.·~':·** "

...**~.:J."**



### _.......1.,
,I \ / _,.I. ri"'!... 

### 4,2.4-852 

# A:::'C- COMBATSTRENGTHTHROUGH LOGISTICS

# ~.~ DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH

, BAQE.745-90 

### DMSIONOFEr.-rvIRONMEI\TTALHEALTH BureauofAirQuality NonnanH.Bangert.er 1950WestNorthTerr.ole Governor PO Box 16690 SuzanneDandoy,M.D

..:"l.P.H. ExecutIveDirector SaltLakeCity. Utah**8~** 116-0690 KennethL.Alkema (801)536-4000 Director (801)536-4099FAX 

### December 3, 

### 1990
Newspaper Agency Salt Lake Tribune Legal Advertising Department 157 Regent Street Salt Lake City. Utah 84111 Gentlemen: This letter will conrlrm tne autnorization to publish the attachedNOTICE in the Salt Lake Tribune and Deserec t;ews on December 7, 1990. Pleasemail the invoice and affidavit ofpublication to theUtah State Department of Health. Division of Environmental**~ealth,** 

### Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 16690, Salt Lake City, [tan S41iO-0690. Siacerely.

. I. "-,

.

# i .'**~.** y 1/ '/,

,...G

-:/v//'/(-., /' -• .I.'
- ../ ,-./,..(

______ 1'..-' / <-1

_**~-\** '- /r')L,
­ 

## Jpys-e I. Wiswe11

.**P~f~te** 

### Technician**I~ureau** 

### of Air Quality / 

### . MK:jiw Enclosure



### 4.2.4-853

### NOTICE The following notice of intent to construct, submitted in accordance with Section 3.1, Utah Air Conservation Regulations, has been received for consideration by the Executive Secretary, Utah Air Conservation Commiccee: Department of the Air Force Building 1701, Dip Tank, Bake Oven, Paint Booths Davis County CDS Al Net emissions from this source (building 1701 only) are calculated at the following values: Particulate 0.01 tons/yr PM10 

### 0.01 tons/yr NO)'; 0.10 tons/yr CO 0.02 tons/yr VOC 4.70 tons/yr The engineering evaluationandair quality impactanalysis hasbeencompleted and
no adverse air quality impacts are expected. It is the intent to the Executive Secretary to approve the construction project. The construction proposal and estimates of the effect on local air quality are available for public inspection and comment at the Bureau of Air Quality, Utah State Department of Health, 1950**~est** 

### North Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116­ 0690.**~ritten** 

### comments receivedby the Bureau, 1950**~est** 

### NorthTemple, P.O. Box 16690, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116-0690, on or before January 6, 1991, will be considered in making the final decision on the approval or disapproval of the proposed construction. If anyone so requests within 15 days ofpublication ofnotice, a hearing will be held in the area of the proposed construction, installation. modification, relocation. or establishment. Date of Notice: December 7, 1990 

# -,

4.2.4-854UTAH BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY NEW/MODIFIED SOURCE PLAN REVIEW
James R. Van Orman Director, Environmental Management Department of the Air Force Headquarters Ogden Air Logistics Center Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056-5990 ENGINEER: L. Carl Broadhead RE: Building 1701, Dip Tank, Bake Oven, Paint Booths Davis County, CDS A1 DATE: November 29, 1990 NOTICE OF INTENT DATED: April 27, 1990 PLANT CONTACT: Jay Gupta PHONE NUMBER: (801) 777-7651 PLANT LOCATION: HAFB, Building 1701 FEES: Filing Fee $100.00 Review Engineer

- 26 hours at S50.00/hour $1300.00 Modeler

- 00 hours at $23.22/hour $000.00 Computer Usage Fee $000.00 Notice to Paper $24.00 Travel

- 00 miles at $0.23/mile $000.00 Total $1424.00
APPROVALS: Engineering Unit Manager**c~** Applicant Contact Made

# ~D Technical Evaluation Section Manager 

# )1\1\.\

4.2.4-855I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Hill Air Force Base has filed a notice of intent dated April 27, 1990. They are proposing to install and operate a dip tank, new paint spray booths (#l and #3), and a bake oven. The location of these facilities will be in Building 1701. The description of each facility is as follows: Dip Tank The dip tank, an industrial heavy duty double wall tank, will contain thermelic insulating varnish for dip coating of locomotive electrical components including generators and their components. These components are currently hand coated using a brush, resulting in nonuniform electrical insulation. The cylindrical dip tank will have inner dimensions of 7 feet in diameter and 7 feet high with a capacity of 2,000 gallons. The tank will be installed vertically with 5 feet underground and 2 feet of tank above ground. The tank will be equipped with cathodic protection, a dip drain or catch system, a leak detection system, and a ventilation system installed on the upper side portion of the tank. A sealed clam-type lid will be also provided to cover the top of the tank. The lid will be kept closed except when loading or unloading components. The tank will be agitated and fitted with an electric heater capable of heating varnish to a temperature of 90-100oF. The dip coated components will be airdried in paint spray booth #1 and then baked in the bake oven. The following numbers describe the operation: A. Annual operating hours

- 1000 hours per year. B. Annual usage rate

- 144 gallons of varnish per 12 month period. C. Stack diameter

- 12 inches. D. Stack height

- 60 feet above ground. PaintSpray Booth #1 This booth is a waterfall type paint spray booth and will be replaced with a Devilbiss Model ASEY-914-34 dry filters paint spraybooth. The dimensions of the proposed paint spray booth are 15 feet long, 12 feet wide, and 10 feet high. The paint spray booth will be equipped with paint arrestor filters, exhaust plenum, a fan, and a 34 inch diameter vent. The following numbers describe the operatiotl: A. Annual operating hours

- 1000 hours per 12 month period B. Annual usage rate 120 gallons of paint per 12 month period (current limitation). C. Exhaust face velocity

- 100 feet per minute. D. Exhaust flow rate

- 18,000 cubic feet per minute. E. Stack diameter

- 34 inches. F. Stack height

- 50 feet above ground PaintSpray Booth #3 This booth will be replaced with two (2) end-to-end rail car drive-through, down draft air paint booths including material handling equipment, make-up air units**~~d** paint handling and spray equipment. The dimensions of the each segment, north and south, are 76 feet long, 20 feet wide, and 21 feet high and 22 feet long, 20 feet wide, and 21 feet high, respectively. The two segments will be
2 

### 4.2.4-856constructed as a single booth divided bybifolding doors. Each paint spraybooth segment will be self supporting with its own balanced exhaust, make-up air units and controls. Each segment will also be equipped with an audible alarm to warn the painters when and if the air filters are functioning improperly. This notice of intent also proposed to replace the existing conventional spray gun with High Volume Low Pressure (HVLP) spray guns which will result in high transfer efficiency. This should lower paint consumption for the same amount of work load resulting in lower VOC emissions to the atmosphere. The following numbers describe the operation: A. Annual operating hours

- 1000 hours per year B. Annual usage rate 800 gallons of paint per 12 month period (current limitation). C. Exhaust face velocity

- 100 feet per minute. D. Exhaust flow rate

- 18,000 cubic feet per minute. E. Stack diameter

- 34 inches. F. Stack height

- 50 feet above ground Bake Oven The electric bake oven will be replaced with a natural gas fired oven. The heat input for the proposed natural gas fired oven is 2 million BTU per hour. Its operating temperature range will be 0-450oF. The dimensions of the oven are 10 feet long, 10 feet wide, and 10 feet high. The following numbers describe the operation: A. Annual operating hours

- 1000 hours per year. B. Total oven capacity

- 2 million Btu per hour. C. Fuel

- natural gas. C. Exhaust flow rate

- 1,000 cubic feet per minute. D. Stack diameter

- 10 inches. E. Stack height

- 50 feet above ground II. EMISSION SUMMARY The emissions from this source (Building 1701) will be as follows: Particulate 0.01 tons';year PM,o 0.01 tons/year S02 0.00 tons/year NOx 0.10 tons/year CO 

## ,,..,,k. 0.02 tons/year VOC**~J"'1~ .~**  tons/year III. BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (BACT) ANALYSIS BACT will be required at all emission points. This includes the following points: A. Dip tank B. Paint spray booths C. Bake oven

3 

### 4.2.4-857Dip Tank Several types of control techniques are available to reduce VOC emissions from a dip coating operation. These methods can be broadly categorized as either control equipment or new coating and application systems. Possible best available control technology equipment includes carbon adsorption and incineration. Installation of either of these options is not economical or practical, especially with modest VOC emissions. The capital cost of adsorption units is assumed to be $10jCFM. New coatings with relatively low VOC contents can be used in place of high VOC content coatings. This method of control may not be available for HAFB due to the coating requisition for the electronic component insulation. The engineering section recommends that BACT for the diptankbe theminimization of VOC emissions through good operating practice. The cover should be kept closed at all times except for loading and unloading of components. Waste or used coating shall be stored in covered containers and disposed by a method which prevents its emission into the atmosphere. PaintSpray Booths Several types of control techniques are available to reduce VOC emissions from surface coating operations. These methods can be broadly categorized as either control equipment or new coating and application systems. Best available control technology equipment includes carbon adsorption and incineration. Installation of these control devices is not economical or practical, especially with modest VOC emissions. New coatings with relatively low VOC coatings can be used in place of high VOC content coatings. This**me~hod** of control may not be available for HAFB due to the requisition of coating materials. The engineering section recommends**tha~** BACT for the paint spray booths be the

.. minimization of emissions through good operating practice. Improvements in transfer efficiency decrease the amount of coating used which will result in reducing VOC emissions into the atmosphere. The distance between spray gun and substrate to be painted must be minimized to increase the transfer efficiency. Waste or used coating shall be stored in covered containers and disposed of by a method which prevents its emission into the atmosphere. Paint particulate emissions from the spray booth will be controlled by dry filters. All air exitingthe booth shall pass through this control systembefore being vented into the atmosphere. The dry filter must be properly maintained and kept in good condition at all times.

. Bake Oven The engineering section recommends that BACT for the bake oven be 10% opacity and the minimization of emissions through good operating practices. The bake oven must be properly maintained and operated in good working condition. Natural gas is the cleanest fuel available. The properly maintained and operated oven will also be beneficial in that it will minimize VOC and CO emissions. IV. APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL AND UTAH AIR CONSERVATION REGULATIONS (UACR) This notice of intent is for a**modifica~ion ~o**  an existing major source. It is not a new major source or a major modification of existing sources. The following federal and state regulations have been examined to determine their applicability to this notice of intent: 1. Section 3.1.1, UACR

- Notice of intent required a modified source. This regulation applies. 

# -
4 

### 4.2.4-858

### 2. Section 3.1.8, UACR Application of best available control technology (BACT) required at all emission points. This regulation applies. 3. Section 3.1.9, UACR

- Rules for relocation of temporary sources. HAFB is a permanent source. Therefore, this regulation does not apply. 4. Section 3.1.10, UACR

- Additional information requirements for a new major source or a major modification which emits precursors of ozone and impact an area of nonattainment for ozone. This notice of intent does not represent a new major source or a major modification. Therefore, this regulation does not apply. 5. Section 3.2, UACR

- Particulate emission limitations for existing sources which are located in a nonattainment area. HAFB is listed in this regulation. However, these new emission points at the base are**~ct** 

### ir.cludec**i~** 

### that listin;. The=efc=e, this**regulatic~** 

### does not apply. 6. Section 3.3.1, UACR

- Emission limitation for new major sources which are located in a nonattainment area or which impact a nonattainment area. This notice of intent does not represent a new major source or a major modification. Therefore, this regulation will not apply. 7. 

### Section 3.3.2, UACR

- Review requirements for new major sources or major modifications which are located in a nonattainment area or which impact a nonattainment area. This notice of intent does not represent a new major source or a major modification. Therefore, this regulation will not apply. 8. Section 3.5, UACR

- Emission inventoryreporting requirements. This regulation requires any source which emits 25 tons or more per year of any pollutant to submit an emission inventory to the Bureau of Air Quality every year. This source must comply with this regulation since its entire source emissions are greater than 25 tons per year. Therefore, HAFB shall include emissions from sources listed in this approval order in its annual emission inventory. 9. Section 3.6.5(b), UACR

- Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) review requirements for new major sources or major modifications. This notice of intent does not represent a new major source or a major modification under PSD rules. Therefore, this' regulation does not apply. 10. Section 3.8, UACR

- Stack height rule. This regulation limits the creditable height of stacks to that height determined to be good engineering practice. The formulas used to determine good engineering practice are found in 40 CFR 51.1. A de minimus height of 65 meters (213.2 feet) is allowed. This notice of intent does not have stacks which exceed 65 meters in height. HAFB is in compliance with this regulation. 11. 

### Section 3.11, UACR

- Visibility screening analysis requirements. This regulation requires all new major sources or major modifications to undergo a visibility screening analysis to determine visibility impact on any mandatory Class I area. This notice of**inten~ ~oes**  

### not re?resent a new major source or a major modification under UACR rules. Therefore, this regulation does not apply.
5 

### 4.2.4-85912. Section 4.1.2, UACR

- 20% opacity**l~itation** at all emission points unless a more stringent limitation is required by New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) or BACT or National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). In this case, BACT will require a lower opacity limitation of 10%. 13. Section 4.1.9, UACR

- EPA Method 9 to be used for visible emission observations. This regulation applies. 14. Section 4.2.1, UACR

- Sulfur content**l~itations** in oil and coal used for combustion. This notice of intent does not contain oil or coal burning sources. Therefore, this regulation does not apply. 15. Section 4.7, UACR

- Unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. This regulation applies. 16. Section 4.9, UACR Review requirements for volatile organic compound 

## (Vee) sources located in a nonattainment area for ozone.**~~~~ re;~:ati=~** **=C7e=~ ~he** **~=~:~:,;in; ===~=~**  A. Petroleum liquid storage B. Petroleum liquid transfer/storage C. Control of hydrocarbon emissions in refineries 1) vacuum producing systems 2) wastewater separators 3) process unit turnaround 4) catalytic cracking units 5) safety pressure relief valves 6) leaks from petroleum refinery equipment 

### D. Degreasing and solvent cleaning operations 1) cold cleaning facilities 2) open top vapor degreasers 3) conveyorized degreasers 

### E. Cutback asphalt 

### F. 

## vec used for various processes 1) paper coating 2) fabric and vinyl coating 3) metal furniture coating 4) large appliance surface coating 5) magnet wire coating 6) flat wood coating 7) misc. metal parts and products 8) graphic arts G. Synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing 

### H. Perchlorethylene dry cleaning plants. This regulation would apply if these emission points were existing sources at the time of promulgation of this regulation. However, in this case, this regulation has been supercededby BACT requirements. 17. Section 5, UACR

- Emergency episode requirements. This regulation applies. 18. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS)

­ There are no NESHAPS for this industrial process. 19. National Ambient Air Quality standards (NAAQS)

- This source is located in Davis County, which is a nonattainment area for ozone. The Bureau of Air Quality guidelines does not call for this notice of intent to be modeled for any pollutant. The Bureau has found through experience that, because of the small increase in the quantity of emissions involved and the conservative predictions made by modeling, a source or emission point of this small size or increase is very unlikely to cause a new violation of the NAAQS. 

### 4.2.4-860 6

### 20. New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)

- There is no NSPS for this industrial process. 21. 40 CFR 60.14, Definition of Modification Any physical or operational change to an existing facility which results in an increase in the emission rate to the atmosphere of any pollutant to which an NSPS standard applies. The following are not by themselves considered modifications: 1) Maintenance, repair, and replacement 2) An**in~rease** 

### in production rate of an existing facility, if that increase can be accomplished without a capital expenditure on that facility 3) An increase in the hours of operation 4) Use of an**alte~native** 

### fuel or raw material if, prior to the date any standard under this part becomes applicable to that source type, as provided by 60.1, the existing facility was designed to accommodate that alternative use 5) The addition or use of any system or device whose primary function is the**~eduction** 

### of air pollutants 6) Relocation or change in ownership This notice of intent represents a modification under this rule. 22. Definition of Major Modification

- It means any physical change in or change in the method of operation of a major source that would result in a significant net emission increase of any pollutant. A net emissions increase that is significant for VOC shall be considered significant for ozone. A physical change or change in the method of operation shall not include: A. Routine maintenance, repair, or replacement B. Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by reason of an order under Section 2a and b of the ESECA of 1974 or by reason of a natural gas curtailment plan pursuant to the Federal Power Act C. Use of an alternative fuel by reason of an order under Section 125 of the CM D. Use of an alternative fuel at a steam generating unit to the extent that the fuel is generated from municipal solid waste E. Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by a source: 1) which the source was capable of accommodating before January 6, 1975, unless such change would be prohibited under any enforceable permit condition 2) which the source is otherwise approved to use

7 

### 4.2.4-861

### F. An increase in the hours of operation or the production rate unless such change would be prohibited under any enforceable permit condition G. Any change in ownership at a source This notice of intent does not represent a major modification under this rule. V. RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ORDER CONDITIONS 1. Hill Air Force Base, located in Davis County, shall make the following changes according to the information submitted in the notice of intent dated April 27, 1990: A. Install a dip tank, 2000 gallon capacity cylindrical tankwith dimensions of 7 feet diameter and 7 feet high, equipped with cathodic protection, a dip drain o!" catch system, a leak detection system, an electric heater, and a cover. B. Remove paint booth #1 and replace it with a Devilbiss Model ASEY-914-34 paint spray booth or equivalent

- Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary. The booth shall be equipped with dry paint arrestor filters. 

## c. Remove paint booth #3 and replace it with two end to end paint spray booths

- The booths shall be equipped with dry paint arrestor filters and High Volume Low Pressure (HVLP) type spray guns. D. Remove the electric powered bake oven and replace it with one fired by natural gas at a total heat input rate of 2 million Btu/hr. 2. Visible emissions from any point or fugitive emission source associQ.;:ed with the .;.:;ove emission points shall not exceed 10\ opacity. Opacity observation of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. 

### 3. The following operation limits shall not be exceeded without prior approval in accordance with Section 3.1, UACR: A. Dip tank 1. 144 gallons of varnish per 12 month period 2. 8 hours per day 3. 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period B. Paint spray booth #1 1. 120 gallons of paint per 12 month period 2. 8 hours per day 3. 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period C. Paint spray booth #3 1. 800 gallons of paint per 12 month period 2. 8 hours per day 3. 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period

8 

### 4.2.4-862

### D. Bake oven 1. 2.2 million SCF of natural gas per 12 month period 2. 2.0 million BTUjhr heat input 3. 8 hours per day 4. 1000 hours of operation per 12 month period Compliance with the annual limitations shall be determined on a rolling monthly total. On the first day of each month a new 12 month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. Records of production shall be kept for all periods when the plant is inoperation. Records of production shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his representative upon request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. Fuel consumption for the bake oven shall be determined by the use of records from a fuel meter. VOC emissions shall be determined by maintaining a record of paints, solvents, and varnish used. The records shall be kept on a daily basis. Hours of

.....**~'=?_~"::":.-- ~h~ll**  .......,....**~O"'~:-:-:~:'.~d** bv

..**:7~;V'~t="r-o~ ~':':'r:!~~~":",j,,,!!'"""** **~_-4** 

### maintaining of an operations log. 4. The total VOC emissions from sources listed in this approval order shall not exceed 4.70 tons per l2-month period without prior approval in accordance with Section 3.1, 

### UACR. Compliance with the limitation shall be**determ~ned** 

### using a material balance procedure on a rolling monthly**~otal.** 

### On first day of each month a new 12 month total shall be**calcula~ed** 

### using the previous 12 months. The total VOC emissions shall be determined by maintaining a record of paints, varnish, thinners, and solvents used, and of operation parameters from other affected VOC emissions sources. The record shall include the following data for each item used: A. Name of paint, varnish, thinner, or solvent B. weight in pounds per gallon C. Percent VOC by weight D. Amount used on a daily basis Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records of consumption shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his representative upon request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. The VOC emissions from paints/varnish/thinners/solvents shall not exceed 4.69 tons per 12 month period. The VOC emissions from other processes shall not exceed 0.01 

### tons per 12 month period. 5. Paint spray booths #1 and #3 shall be equipped with a set of paint arrestor particulate filters to control particulate emissions. All air exiting either booth shall pass through a paint arrestor control system before being vented to the atmosphere. 6. The owner/operator shall operate the dip tank in following manner: 

### A. The cover shall remain closed at all times except during actual loading, unloading, or transfer operations. B. Parts shall be completely drained in the internal draining rack until all dripping ceases. C. Waste or used varnish shall be stored in covered containers and disposed

_ 5**De~hod** 

### which prevents VOC emissions to the atmosphere.

9 

### 4.2.4-863

# - D. Tanks, containers, and all associated equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition, and leaks shall be repaired immediately. E. Written procedures for the operation and maintenance of the dip tank shall be posted in an accessible and apparent location near the equipment. 7. Eighteen months from the date of this approval order the Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing of the status of construction of this project unless the construction is complete and operation has commenced. B. 

### A copy of this approval order shall be maintained on-site and available to the operators. 9. 

### All installations and facilities authorized by this approval order shall be adequately and properly maintained. 10. The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon start-up of the installation, as an initial compliance inspection is required. Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved in accordance wit Section 3.1.1, UACR. This approval order in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations including the Utah Air conservation Regulations. "Allowable emissions" as defined in Section 1.12, UACR, for sources listed in this approval order are calculated at 0.01 tons/yr for particulates, 0.01 tons/yr

­ for PM10, 

### 0.0006 tons/yr for 502' 

### 0.10 tons/yr for NO., 0.02 tons/yr for CO, and 4.70 tons/yr for VOCs. These calculations are for the purposes of determining the applicability of PSD and nonattainment areamajor source requirements of the UACR. They are not to be used for purposes of determining compliance. CARL HILL.ENG

10 

### 4.2.4-864MEMORANDUM FROM: TO 

### Donald E. Tim Blanchard;) Robinson, Manager. Environmental Engineering Section, Health Engineer BAQ

SUBJECT: 

### Modify an Tank, Bake Oven, Intent to Approve and Paint Bfor oothHill AFB Building 1701. Dip

DATE: 

### January 2, 1991**=~===~==========================~===================================~===========** 

### On October 19, 1990 a change to the dip tank specifications was received by the BAQ. The change was not incorporated into the subject Intent to Approve sent to James R. Van Orman at Hill AFB on December 7, 1990. The modified NOI indicated that the new dip tank would be installed above ground rather than**underg~ound.** 

### Because the tank is being installedabove ground the cathodic protectionand leak detection systemwill not be installed. The dimensions of the tankwere reduced from 7 feet inside diameter to 4 feet inside diameter, and from 7 feet high to 4 feet high. The tank will now be a double wall construction. The capacity is reduced from 2000 gallons to 370 gallons. The emissions from the tank will less because the surface area has beenreduced. December 21, 1990 a letter reflecting the above information was sent in as part of the public comment process.



### 4.2.4-865...,.. vv_ 

## .- 

## .-..**_~---** zuc::;.c 

# " 

# ......­ _ r • .:...:



# 21DEC19S0 Date

I 

# . .

Mr F Burnell Cordner, 

### Execu-cive Sec-::et:a..ry 

### Bureau of Air Quali

### r;y 

### 1950 west 

### North**T~le** 

### PO 

### Box 16690 Salt Lake 

### City, UT 84116-0690 RE: Public COlI!lIlents 

### on Intent to Approve building 

### UOI, Dip 

### T.s.nk. Bake Oven 

### & Paint: 

### Boo'ths. 

### DearMr Cordner 

### Referenced 

### Inten't to Approve**da~eci** 

### 7 Dec 90, we offer**~he follow~ng** **publ~c** 

### comments for 

### your consideration Condition 1.A. -.Per our 18 OC't 

### 90**le~ter, ~ual**  

### wall dip**~riK** 

### shall be 370 

### galloncapacitymeasuring approximately 4 

### feet inside**dis~ete~** 

### Qnd 4 feet 

## high. The tank**~l** 

## be locat:ed above ground, 

### therefore. cathcdic p=otect:ion will 

### not: be providecL The 

### taDk ","ill 

### be provided

....... 

## i11:J c:. 

### sealed clam type lid, 

### out:Side**F~** 

### liquid circulating**t}~e agit~t:ion,** **electri~** 

### heat:er and .s. 

### Vent: sys'l:em. 

### Condition 4 - 

### Our estimation of

## voe**~missions** 

### f=om sources**lis~ed** 

### in this Intent to A.pprove 

### is 

### 3.•28 tons 

### per year. Revised VOG 

### evapora.;:i··..

### e ",missions 

### from the dip**~e** 

### as**follo~s: Unco~~rolled**  AP-42 

### Emission**Fac~or** 

### 0.15 Lb 

### VOCjHr,**F~~** 

### Evaporative 

### area (revised) X**(4)2~** 12.56 

### Ft:2 t. 

### Operating hOllIS 

### abou't 

### 1,000

## hrs/Y~**Uncont~ollad** 

### evaporative less 

### .15 Lb X 12.56 Ft7. X1,000 h=s 

### X 

### Ton hr, 

### Ft:2 

### 2,000 Lbs '"" 0.94 

### Ton/yr

".

## -.



### ..Emission

### ReduCtion Fac'l:or 30-60: 

### use 40% 

### ·.Eva.porative

### voe**e.m:f"~s~oris·** O.94-X 

### .6 

## = .56 TonfYr 

### ".**'~Dip** t:ank·

### usage Loss--:(NOI) = 

### .06 Ton/Yr

.. _::.,',..Paint:.bOoth

### 'ifl.voc:.:eInissicn.s (NO!)

- :12 

### + .34 = 

### :4.6 TonjYr



### . . ..-:Baldng Oven VOC·.·wisions (NOI) 

## =- .12**Toofi~** 

### .



## ..__>::.?aint: booth 

## f}3

## voe ·emissioIlS (NOl) 2.08·

### Tons/fr.**_~_Tota1.** 

### vOC 

### ",missions.

... 0.56 +.06 +**.~6** 

### .l2 7 

### 2.08 .' "-' ..: . ". 3.28 'torisjY::::

. . . .

. .

# ­**;.~** >:.:.:-.:;,**:'~'''' .:...~** . ..: •." .."- ,:"

.....;: .",**.;-'~.** .•.. -." .. :. :' ..**;_;I:f·Y<?~** 

### have 

### any

### questi~·/~

# pfease feel

### free.·to~on:.cact 

### Jay.Gupta

### a.~:7T7;'6.917. :**'--~: ,_.-:~:;.,_.** .';".
. ..

### ". .'

...**:::~.** -.**.:."~''''.~** 

### --:

.... 

### 4.2.4-866

.,. ......
", '"'-
.

# ·~!zf~~f~2!?-···· 

# .DEPARTMENTOFTHEAIR FORCE HEADQUARTERSOGDEN AIR LOGISTICSCENTER (AFLCl

## O**~j** 

## 1990 HILLAIR FORCE BASE, UTAH 84056-5990



### Mr F. Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary 

# sef1 8 

### 1990 Bureau of Air Quality 288 North 1460 West PO Box 16690 Salt Lake City, DT 84116-0690 RE: Notice of Intent to Construct a Dip Tank, Bake Oven and Paint Booth Modification

- Bldg 1701 Dear Mr Cordner On 

### 27 April 90 we submitted the reference NOI. We have made several calls to your consultant, Tetra Tech, Inc in California. According to Tetra Tech. this NOI was processed by them and sent to UBAQ on 9 Sep 90. We wish to commence construction on this project during Nov 90. We, therefore, request an expeditious review and issue of an approval order. Also, due to a design change, please note that the double wall dip tank will be located above ground and not underground as stated in our original NOI. New dip tank shall be 4' inside diameter, 6' outside diameter and 4' in height. A sealed clam type lid will be provided as before. Dip tank will be equipped with a ventilation system, as stated before, installed on the upper side portion of the tank. Exhaust vent will be 6" diameter approximately 55'-60' above ground. Exhaust volume is estimated to be 100 cubic feet per minutes. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jay Gupta at 777-6917.



### 4.2.4-867 

# AFLC-- COMr..;.;.. STRENGTH THROUGH LOGISTICS

# -- 1LLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: DATE: TIME: 1701 AUG-28-90 9:00 AM
SOURCE: NET EMISSION INCREASES COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701
CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED
POLLUTANT LBS/HR HOURLY GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR ANNUAL GRAMS/SEC XCNTRL LBS/IlR TONS/YR TOTAL PARTICULATE••••••.•••• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 PM-10 •••••••••••••••••••••• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 SOx••.••••••••.••••••••••••• 0.0012 0.00 0.0006 0.00 0.00 0.0012 0.0006 NOx••••••••.•••••••••••.•••• 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 CO•••••••••••••••••••••.••.• 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 VOC, NON-METHANE•.•••••••••• 4.06 0.51 2.03 0.06 36.23 6.37 3.19 VOC, METHANE•••••••••.•••••• 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00

SOURCE: TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE TOTAL PRE-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE



### 4.2.4-868?LLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: DATE: TIME: 1701 AUG-28-90 9:00AM
SOURCE: TOTAL PRE·MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701
CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED
POLLUTANT LBS/HR HOURLY GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR ANNUAL GRAMS/SEC XCNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR TOTAL PARTiCULATE••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM-10 •••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOx.•.•••.••••••••••.•••••.• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOx••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOC, NON-METHANE••••••••••.• 5.34 0.67 2.67 0.08 0.00 5.34 2.67 VOC, METHANE•.•.•••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH #1

- PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION PAINT SPRAY BOOTH #3

- PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION



### 4.2.4-869

# -

.HROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: DATE: TIME: 1701 AUG-28-90 9:00 AM

SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 1 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701
CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED

POLLUTANT LBS/HR HooRLY GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR ANNUAL GRAMS/SEC CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR
VOC nonMETHANE 0.70 0.09 0.35 0.01 0.00 0.70 0.35

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 4.2 SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.'-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING PAINT TYPE: PAINT

COMMENTS VOC nonMETHANE ••••••••••.. 5.80 LBS/GAL FROM NOI**V(~)** (VOC CONTENT)••••• 78.80 X (VOC DENISTY OF COATINGS)/(COATING DENSITY)*100 COATING DENSITy ....•.. 7.36 LBS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALBE 4.2.2.1-1

USAGE RATES•..••••..•••.•... 120.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 0.12 GAL/HR**(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/WEEK)/(~EEKS/YR)**

HooRS OF OPERATION
KOORS PER DAy ..•••.•.•••••• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI DAYS PER**~EEK** ••••••..•••••• 5 DAYSNEEK FROMNOI**~EEKS** PER YEAR •..••..•.••.• 52**~EEKS/YEAR** FROM NOI HOURS PER YEAR ..•......•..• 1000 HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI. INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-870c-.cJ\IITROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOl!: FILE: 1701 DATE: AUG-28-90 TIME: 9:00 AM
SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 3 . PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701 CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED HClJRLY ANNUAL POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC XCNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR VOC non METHANE 4.64 0.58 2.32 0.07 0.00 4.64 2.32

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOORCES 4.2 SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING PAINT TYPE: VOC CONTENT OF PAINT RANGED 3.2TO 5.8LBS/GAL
COMMENTS VOC non METHANE ••••••••••.• 5.BO LBS/GAL FROM NOI, ASSUMED HIGHEST VALUE vex) evoc CONTENT)••••• 78.BO X (VOC DENISTY OF COATINGS)/eCOATING DENSITY)-100 COATING DENSITy ••••••• 7.36 LBS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALBE 4.2.2.1-1
USAGE RATES••••••••••••••••• BOO.OO GAL/YR FROM NOI O.BO GAL/HR**eGAL/YR)/(HClJRS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EK)/e~EKS/YR)**

.•:> OF OPERATION HClJRS PER DAy •••••••••••••• 8 HClJRS/DAY FROM NOI DAYS·PER WEEK •••••••••••••• 5**DAYS/~EK** FRtJ4 NOI**~EKS** PER YEAR ••••••••••••• 52**~EKS/YEAR** FRtJ4 NOI HOURS PER YEAR ••••••••••.•• 1000 HClJRS/YEAR FRtJ4 NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-871**~ROLLED** AND**U~CONTROLLED** EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: OATE: TIME: 1701 AUG-28-90 9:00AM
SOURCE: TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701 ESTIMATE

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED
POLLUTANT LBS/HR HClJRLY GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR ANNUAL GRAMS/SEC XCNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR TOTAL PARTICULATE••.••.•••.• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 PH-10 ••••.•••••••••••••••.. 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 SOx••,•••••••••" ••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOx••,•••'..••••••••••••••.• 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 CO•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 VQC, NON-METHANE•••••••••••• 9.40 1.18 4.70 0.14 19.71 11.71 5.85 VQC, HETHAME•••••••.••••••.• 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00

SClJRCE: DIP TANK

- USAGE LOSS DIP TANK

- EVAPORATION LOSS PAINT SPRAY BOOTH '1 • USAGE LOSS FROM OIP TANK PAINT SPRAY BOOTH '1

- PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION PAINT SPRAY BOOTH #3 • PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION BAKE OVEN

- USAGE LOSS FROM DIP TANK BAKE OVEN

- NATURAL GAS FIRED



### 4.2.4-872(ROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: DATE: TIME: 1701 AUG-28-90 9:00 AM

SOURCE: DIP TANK

- USAGE LOSS COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701
CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED

POLLUTANT LBS/HR HOURLY GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR ANNUAL GRAMS/SEC %CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR
VOC non METHANE 0.12 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.06

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 4.2 SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED PAINT TYPE: VARNISH SURFACE COATING

COMMENTS
VOC non METHANE**V(~)** •••••••••••••••••• COATING DENSITy •.•.•.. 4.10
50.00

8.20 LBS/GAL

LBS/GAL V(%)*(CDATING DENSITY)/100
FROM NOI

.FROM NOI

USAGE RATES••••••••..••••••. 144.00 0.14 GAL/YR GAL/HR FROM NOI**(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/IIEEK)/(~EKS/YR)** USAGE LOSS AT DIP TANK•.•••. 20.00 % FROM NOI, ASSUMED REMAIN 80% OF USAGE LOSS OCCURRED AT PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AND BAKE OVEN

HOURS OF OPERATION
HOURS PER DAy ••.••..••...•. DAYS PER**~EEK** •••••..•••..•.**~EEKS** PER YEAR ••..••.•..•.. HOURS PER YEAR .••..••...... 8 5 52 1000 HOURS/DAY DAYS/IIEEK IIEEKS/YEAR HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI FROM NOI FROM NOI FROM NOI,**FE~** HOURS INTERMITTENT OPERATION· ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-873**~OLLED** AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 1701 DATE: AUG-28-90 TIME: 9:00AM
SOURCE: DIP TANK

- EVAPORATION LOSS COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701 CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED HOURLY ANNUAL POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC XCNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR VOC non METHANE 3.46 0.44 1.73 0.05 40 

## s.n 2.88
AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 4.6 SOLVENT DEGREASING TABLE 4.6-2 SOLVENT LOSS EMISSION FACTORS FOR DEGREASING OPERATIONS TYPE: OPEN TOP VAPOR WITH ACOVER
COMMENTS VOC non METHANE •••••••••••• 0.15 LB/HR/FT2 TABLE 4.6-2 EVAPORATIVE AREAS••...• 38.47 FT2 FROM NOI, BASED ON 7 FEET DIAMETER
HOURS OF OPERATION**~~IRS** PER DAy .•••••.••••••• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI PER**~EEK** •••••••••••••• S DAYS/IlEEK FROM NOI

PER YEAR •••••••.••••• 52 IlEEKS/YEAR FROM NOI**.~** PER YEAR •.••••••••••• 1000 HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-874'OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 1701 DATE: AUG-28-90 TIME: 9:00 AM
SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 1 - USAGE LOSS FROM DIP TANK COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701 CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED HOORLY ANNUAL POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC XCNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR VOC non METHANE 0.24 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOORCES 4.2SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING PAINT TYPE: VARNISH
COMMENTS VOC non METHANE ••••••••.••• 4.10 LBS/GAL veX)*eCOATING DENSITY)/100 

### vex) •.•.' ...•..•....... 50.00 X FROM NOI COATING DENSiTy .•••••. 8.20 LBS/GAL FROM NOI**U~4GE** RATES••••••••••••••••• 144.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 0.14 GAL/HR**(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR) ~c**  LOSS FROM DIP TANK•••. 40.00 X FROM NOI,

HOURS OF OPERATION HOURS PER DAy .•••••.•••.•.• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI DAYS PER**~EEK** •.••••.••••••. 5**DAYS/~EK** FROM NOI UEEKS PER YEAR .•••.•••••••. 52**~EEKS/YEAR** FROM NOI HOURS PER YEAR .••••••••.•.. 1000 HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-875(ROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 1701 DATE: AUG-28-90 TIME: 9:00 AM

SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 1 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701
CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED
HOURLY ANNUAL POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC %CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR

vee non METHANE 0.70 0.09 0.35 0.01 0.00 0.70 0.35

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 4.2 SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING PAINT TYPE: PAINT

COMMENTS
VOC nonMETHANE •••••••••••• 5.80 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

### veX) (VOC CONTENT)••••• 78.80 X (VOC DENISTY OF COATINGS)/(COATINGDENSITY)·,00 COATING DENSiTy ••••••• 7.36 LBS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALBE 4.2.2.1-1

USAGE RATES•••••••••••••••.• 120.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 0.12 GAL/HR**(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR)**

HOURS OF OPERATION
HOURS PER DAy •.••••.•••...• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI DAYS PER**~EEK** •••••.•••••.•• 5**DAYS/~EEK** FROM NOI**~EEKS** PER YEAR ••••.••••••.. 52**~EEKS/YEAR** FROM NOI HOURS PER YEAR •••.••••..••. 1000 HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATION**FE~** HOURS ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-876'OLLED**A~D** UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 1701 DATE: AUG-28-90 TIME: 9:00 AM
SOURCE: PAINT SPRAY BOOTH 3 - PAINT SPRAYING OPERATIOH COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701 CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED HOURLY ANNUAL POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC XCNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR VOC non METHANE 4.64 0.58 2.32 0.07 0.00 4.64 2.32

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 4.2 SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING PAINT TYPE: VOC CONTENT OF PAINT RANGED 3.2 TO 5.8 LBS/GAL
COMMENTS VOC non METHANE •••••••••.•. 5.80 LBS/GAL FROM NOI, ASSUMED HIGHEST VALUE 

### vex) (VOC CONTENT)..••• 78.80 X (VOCDENISTY OF COATINGS)/(COATING DENSITY)*100 COATING**D~NSITY** ••••••• 7.36 LBS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALSE 4.2.2.1-1
UC:AGE RATES•••••••••••••.••. BOO.OO GAL/YR FROM NOI 0.80 GAL/HR**(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EK)/(~EKS/YR)** "....uRS OF OPERATION HOURS PER DAy ••••••••••••.• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI DAYS PER WEEK •••••••••••••• 5**DAYS/~EK** FROM NOI WEEKS PER YEAR •••••••••.••• 52 WEEKS/YEAR FROM NOI HOURS PER YEAR •••••••.•.••• 1000 HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIOHFEW HOURS ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-877**-~OLLED** AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 1701 DATE: AUG-28-90 TIME: 9:00 AM
SOURCE: BAKE OVEN

- USAGE LOSS FROM DIP TANK COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB • BUILDING 1701 CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED HOURLY ANNUAL POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC %CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR VOC nonMETHANE 0.24 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 SECTION 4EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 4.2 SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING PAINT TYPE: VARNISH CQ4MENTS VOC non METHANE .••••••••••. 4.10 LBS/GAL VC%)-CCOATING DENSITY)/100 VCX) .•••••.••....•.•.• 50.00 % FROM NOI COATING DENSiTy •••.••. 8.20 LBS/GAL FROM NOI
USAGE RATES•.•.•.•••••...•.. 144.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 0.14 GAL/HR**CGAL/YR)/CHOURSIDAY)/CDAYS/~EEK)/C~EKS/YR)** 

### .c LOSS AT DIP TANK••••.. 40.00 X FROM NOI,
HOURS OF OPERATION HOURS PER DAy •.•••••••••••• 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI DAYS PER**~EEK** •••••••••.•.•• 5**DAYS/~EK** FROM NOI**~EEKS** PER YEAR ••••••..••••. 52**~EEKS/YEAR** FROM NOI HOURS PER YEAR .•••••••••••. 1000 HOURS/YEAR FROM NOI, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW HOURS ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-878ROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EHISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 1701 DATE: AUG-28-90 TIME: 9:00 AM

SOURCE: BAKE OVEN

- NATURAL GAS FIRED COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB

- BUILDING 1701

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED
HOURLY ANNUAL POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC %CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR
TOTAL PARTiCULATE••••••••••• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 PM-10 

## ...................... 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 SOx••••••.•••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOx••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 CO••••••,••••••••••••••••••• 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 YOC, NON-METHANE••••.••••••• 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 YOC, METHANE•••••••••••••••• 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00

! FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 YOLUHE _'TION 1EXTERNAL COMBUSTION SOURCES 1.4NATURAL GAS COMBUSTION TABLE 1.4-1 UNCONTROLLED EMISSION FACTORS FOR NATURAL GAS COMBUSTION FUEL TYPE: NATURAL GAS

EMISSION FACTOR INLB PER MILLION CUBIC fEET
TOTAL PARTiCULATE••.•••••••• 5.00 LB/HH FT3 TABLE 1.4-1 PH-10 •••••••••••••••••••••• 5.00 LB/HH fT3 TABLE 1.4-1 SOx••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.60 LB/HH FT3 TABLE 1.4-1 NOx•••••.••••••,•••••••••••• 100.00 LB/HM FT3 TABLE 1.4-1 CO••.••••••••••••.••.••.•••• 20.00 LB/HM FT3 TABLE 1.4-1 YOC, NON-METHANE•.••.••••••• 5.30 LB/HH FT3 TABLE 1.4·1 YOC, METKANE•••.••••.•••.••. 2.70 LB/HM FT3 TABLE 1.4-1

TOTAL**P~ER** RATING.••••••• 2000.00 KBTU/HR FROM NOI fUEL CONSUMPTION RATES.••. 0.00 MM FT3/HR (TOTAL POWER RATING)/(1000 BTU/FT3)/(HH) 2.00 MH FT3/YR (TOTAL POUER RATING)/(1000 BTU/FT3)/(MM)* (ANNUAL OPERATING HOUR) HOURS OF OPERATION
'IRS PER DAy••••••••••••• 8.00 HRS/DAY .,...­ SPER WEEK••••••••••••• 5.00 DAYS/IJEEK ,EKS PER yEAR••••••••••.• 52.00 UEEKS/YR 

### 4.2.4-879 HOURS PER yEAR•••••••••••• 1000.00 HRS/YR FROM NOJ, INTERMITTENT OPERATIONFEW KOURS ADAY DURING DAY SKIFT ONLY--"TROlLED AJI)lJIICD11TROLLED EMISSIDM ESTl"-,TfS felt: FILE DATE 

### TlME 1701 Al)G·28-90 9:00 All

SClJICf: NET EMISSION IIICltEASlS ctJFlUIY NAMf: DEPT. OF TN£ AIR fORa LOCATION: HILL AF8
- BUILDING 1701 UIICDIITR<X.LED
POlLUTANT lBS/HI HClJRLY GIAMS/5c:C TOIIStyR AMWJAl GRAMS/SEC I CNTRL LIS/Mil TCII5/TR TOTAL PARTICULATE••••••;•••• PM·10 •••••••••••••••••••.•• 

### sox...••••••••.••...•••••••• lriIOX••••••••••••••••••••••••• 

### co...•••••••••••.••.•.••...• 

## vee, NQN·METKAHE•..•.••••••• VQC, METHAME•••••••••••••••• 0.01 0.01 0.0012

0.20 0.04­ 4.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.51 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.0006

0.10 0.02 

### 2.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

### 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 

### 36.23

0.00 0.01 0.01 0.0012

0.20 0.04 

### 6.37 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0006

0.10 0.02 3.19 

### 0.00

saJRCE: TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSIOII ESTIMATE TCTAL PRE·MCDIFICATIOK EMISSION ESTIMATE



### 4.2.4-880-"TROLLED AlII) UIlCOl/TROLLED EJUSSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: DATE: TIME: 1101 A\JC-28·9Q 9:00 AM
S(UtCE: TOTAL PRE-MODIfICATION EMISSIOli CQMPANY!WE: DEPT. OF THE AIR fORa LOCATION: HILL AF8 • BUILDING 1701 EsTIMATe

CCNTItOlLED UllCONTROLLEO
Poc.lUTAIiT LBS/HR MQJlU.T**GINCS/~C** TOMSIYR AIIIIIUAL GlANS/SEC XCNTRL lBS/NR TOIlS/YR TOTAL PARTICULATE••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM-l0 •••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOx
.. 0.00 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1I0lt••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.00 

### 0.00 0.00 

### 0.00 0.00 

### 0.00 0.00 

### co .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

### vee, 

### vex:. NON-METkAME•••••••••••• METHAHE•••••••••••••••• 5.34 0.00 0.67 0.00 2.67 0.00 

### 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 

### 5.34 0.00 2..67 

### 0.00

SClJRCE; PAINT SPRAT BOOTH '1 • PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION PAINT SPRAY SOOTH 13 • PAINT SPRAYING OPERATION



### 4.2.4-881

# - MTROLLEl) AHtl UHCOMTROl.LS EMISSIClW ESTIMATES fOR: FILE: DATE: TIME: 1701 AUG·28·90 9:00 AM

saJlCE: PAINT SPlAT BOOTH 1 • PAINT sPUTING OPERATION CQIIPANT!WE: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORa: LOCATION: HILL AF8 • BUILDJlIG 1701
COllTROUEO UNCONTROLLED

POLLUTANT LBS/HR MClJRLT CRAMS/SEC TONS/YR ANNUAL**GR~S/SEC** CMTRL LBi/HR TOilS/TR
vot

### non METIWC£ 

### 0.70 0.09 0.35 0.01 0.00 

### 0.70 0.35

AP·42 FOJRTN EDlnON 5CPT. 1985 \'Ol\.lil( SECTICII 4EVlPClRATlOli LOSS SClJlCES 4.2SURFACE CQlTlNG TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 'lOt EMISSIONS FOR UJlCOIiTllOlLED SURFACf PAINT TYPE: PAIIT COATING

CCMM£NTS
VDC nonMETHANE •••••••••••• 5.80 liS/GAL**fll~** 1/01 

### Vex) (VOC CONTENT).•... 78.80 I (VOC DEMISTl OF COATINGS)/CCOATING DENSITY)·,00**~TtNG** 

### OENSITY ••••••• 7.36 liS/GAL DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALSE 4.2.2.1·1

USAGE LATES••••••••••••••••• 120.00 CiAl/T1! FROM ItOI 0.12 GAl/HR**CGAl/TR)/(HOURSIOAY)/(DAYS~E()/CWEE(SIYR)**

IlaJRS OF OP£RATIOII ICCLJiS PelOAT •••••••••••••• 

## a IIWIS/DAT fR(Jl 1101 O.TS PEl WEEK •••••••••••••• 5 OATS/WEEK FRCII NOI WEEKS PER**T~R** ••••••••••••• 52 WEEICSIYEAI FROM 101 HOURS PER TEAR ••••.•••••... 1000 HQJRS/YeAJl FROM MOl, INTERMITTENT oPERATIOIIFFW KOURS AOAT DURING OAT SNIFT ONLT



### 4.2.4-882UIlCXJITROLL£l) EMISSION UTIMATES FOIl: filE: 17'01 

### DATE: AUG'

### 28·90 TIME: 9:00 ""
E: PAIIlT SPlAY SCOT" 3 • PAINT $PUYING OPERATION IIY IWCE:**~PT.** OF THE AllfORet ION: HILL .FI

- BUILDING 17'01 UIlCONTROLLEO IIOJIlLY**UT~T** lSS/HI ClWCS/SEC TONSIYIt LIS/KR TOIIS/YR


### non lefTHAIlE •••••••••••• 4.64 

## o.sa 2.32 0.07 

### 0.00 2.32

102 FCIJlTIl OlnON SEPT. 1985 YOU_ 1 TJOII 4 EVAPCIUflQI LOSS SOURCES

.SUltfAC£ COATING II.E 4.2.2.1'1

### vee EMISSIONS FOR UtlcalTlO&.W UFAa CQATJlIG faIT TYPE: VOC alNTENT OF PAINT RANGE!) 3.2 TO 5.8LBS/GAL



### C

### non**METH~E** 

### .••••••••••. 5.80 laS/GAL Faa4 1101, ASSlJIEll HIGHEST VALUE**V(~)** 

### (VCC COWTENT)••••. 7'8.80 

## (vee O£»I$TT Of ca.TIWGS)/(CCATING OENSITY)-100 COATIXGDE»5ITY ••••••. 

### 7.36 US/GAL OEFAm.T VALUE fRCJl TALU 4.2.2.,., :$ACE RATES

. 

### 800.00 GAllYi FRCIC 1101 

### 0.&0 GAL/Hi**(GAL/YR)/(HOURSIOAT)/(OAYS~E~}/(WEE~S/YR)** rQ.... .Jf OP£IAT10M 

### HaJRS PER DAy •••••••••••••• 8 HCllISIDAY fllClC 1101 DAYS PER WEEr •••••••••••••• 5 DATSJ1IUl FRCIC 

### 1101 WEEKS 

### PER TEAl ••••••••••••• 52 

### WEEKS/YW FJ(JI 1101 HOURS PER TEAR ••••••••••••• 1000 HOURS/YEAR fROM 1101, INTnIlITTENT OPEllATtOll· FEWHOURS ADAY OURINGDAY SHIFT OWLY



### 4.2.4-883'OUED AND UNCONTROlLED EMISSIOII ESTrMATES fOR: 

### FILE:**DA~:** 

### rUE: 1701 AUG'28-9Q 9:00 N4
SCJJRCE: TOTAL POST-1GlIffCATrOll.EMISSION CtlMPAilY KAME: DEPT. Of THE All FCRee LOCATION: HILL AFB • BUILDING 1101 ESTIMATE

COIITRQ.lED UIICCllIITROlLED
POLLUTANT LIS/Hit IlClJIlLT GlANS/SEC TOMS/YI AlillUAl GRAMS/SEC %ClITRL LaS/Hit TOMS/YR TOTAL PARTICULATE••••••••••• 

### PM·10 ••.••••••.••••••••..•• 

### sox••••••••••••.••••.••••••• NOx••••••••••••••••••••••••• CD•••••••••••••••••••••••••• YO(, NON·METHAXE•.•.•••..••• 

## vce:, METIlANE•••••••••••••••• 

### 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.20 

### 0.04 9.40 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 

### 0.01 1.18 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 

### 0.10 0.02 4.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

### 19.7' 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.20 

### 0.04 11.7'1 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 

### O.'0 0.02 

### 5.&5 0.00

Sl1JRce: DIP TANI: • uSAGE LOSS DIP TAMil: • evAPClltATIOII Lost PAINT SPRAT 800TH " • I.OSS fR(Jl DIP TAIII: PAINT SHAT Boon t1 • PAINT SPlATING OPUATIc. PAUIT sPRAY IIQ)TH f3

. PAIIiT SfIItATJMG QPfItATIc. BAKE Mil • USACE LOSS FRCIt DIP TA*: BAKE Mil

- IlATUlAL liAS FIRED



### 4.2.4-884**~ROLLEO** AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSIOM ESTIMATES fCK: flU;: DATE: TItE: 1701 AUG-Z8'90 9:00 Nt

SOURCE: DIP T ANr:

- USAGE lOSS CCIIPANY NAMe: DEPT. Of TKf AIR FORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB • BU1L01MG 1701 UNCONTROl.LEO

POL.LlJTAHT LiS/IlR HOJItLY CiUIlS/SEC TOliS/y1l ANNUAL GRAMS/SEC CNTRl LBS/HR TOIIS/YR
VO' nonMETIWIE 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.06

AJl·42 FaJRTH EDlTlC)II SEPT. 1985 VOLUME SECTION 4 EVAPORATION L.OSS saJaCES 4.2 SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VlXf)(ISSICNS FOIl UMCOIlTROLLED PA111T TYPE: VARNISH SURFAC£ COATING

CCH&EIlTS


### veenonMETHANE •••••••••••. 

### ves) •••••••••••••••••• COlTING DEWSITY ••••••• 4.10
50.00

15.20 L.as/GAL.
% LSS/GAl V(%)*(COATING DENSITT)!100

fROl NOI FRQlII NOI

OSAGE RATES••.•••••.••.••... 144.00 0.14 GALin GAL/HR FROM N01**eGAl/YR)!eHOURS!DAY)/eDATSIWEEr:)/eWEE~S/YR)** USAGE lOSS AT DIP TAN(•..... 20.00 FROM N01, ASSUMED REMAIN 80"OF USAGE LOSS OCCURRED AT PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AND SAXE OVEN

HClJIS OF OPEItAT1011
HaulS PER OAT ••••••••...•.• OATS PER WEE{ •••••...••••••**WEE~S** PER TEAR ••••••••••••• MOUltS PER YEAR ••••••••••••• 8 5 52 1000 IIOJtS/llAY DA'fs/wn WfEKS/TW 1l000S/TEAR FrtOK N01 FRQlII 1IQ1 FROM 1101 FROM 1101. IIITERMITTEIIT OPERATIOIlFEW HOURS AOAT DURING CAT SHIfT ONLY



### 4.2.4-885"-'TROLLED AIlO UllCONTROlLfD EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE 17Q1 DATE 100-28,90 

### TIME 9:00 Nt
SQJRCE: DIP TANI: • EVAPOItATIOIII lOSS COMPANY NAM:: DEPT. Of THE All FOIlCE LOCATION: MILL AFe • BUILDING 1701 COIITIOlLEO WlCOMTROLLEO HaJRLY AlUIUAL POUUTANT LIS/HI GRAMS/SEC TOIS/YI GRAMS/SEC %CNTRL LBS/HR TOMS/Yll VOC non METIWI£ 

### 3.46 0.44 1.73 0.05 40 

### 5.n 

### 2.88

AP'42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 19!'S YOLlJIE 1 S£cnON 4 EVAPCflATlCII LOSS SOURCES 4.6SOLVENT DEGIIWING TAiLE 4.6-2 SOLVbT LOSS fJUSSION FACTORS F<lI OEGR.EASING OPERATIONS

.TYPE: OPEN TOP VAPCl WITH ACOV9

ctIItENTS VOC: non METHANE •••••••••••• 0.15 LJ/HR/FT2 TABLE 4.6·Z EVAPORATIVE AREAS•••••• 31.47 HZ FItCIC NOI. BASED 011 7 FEET OIAMETfi
HC1lRS OF OPERA11C* MOURS PER CAy •••••••••••••. 

## a He:gS/DAT FIIQM MOl DAYS 

### PER WEEK •••••••.••••.. 5 CAYSMEK FIIQM 1101 '$ PEl Y£AI ••••••••••••• 52 \EEKSIYEAR FR(JII 1101

;PER VEAl ••••••••••••• 1000 HaJRSIYEAR FRO!' 1101. INTEItMJTTEJfT OPERATION' FEW**~s** 1 DAY DUltING OAT $111FT ONLY



# -

, 4.2.4-886-"TROLLED AND UIICOIITROlLED EMISSICII ESTIICATES FOR: FILE 1701 DATE AtJ(i·28-90 

### TIME 9:00 .,. SWRa;: PAlllT SPRAY BOOTH 1 • USAGE LOSS FItQIII DIP TAJlI: COMPAllT IIAAE: DEPT. Of TIlE AIR fORCE lOCATlOM: HILL Afa • 8UIL..DIIIG 1101 COIfTROllEO U)ICOIjTROlLED ItWItLY AMJIUAl POLLUTANT LiS/lUI GlAMS/S£C TCIIS/YR GlWlS/SEC:lClCTRL lBS/Kll TONS/TI VOC non METHANE 0.24 

### a.C13 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12

AP·42 FCUlTIf EX)ITICII SUT. 1985 VOLlJE 1 se:crIQII It EVAl'atATICIN LOSS $ClJRcES 4.2 SURFACE COlTIMG TABLE 4.2.2.1'1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UllC01/TlOc.LED SURfACE COATING PAINT T1P£: VARNI'"

.
CCMCEIITS 'IOC

### non METHAJU: •••••••••••• 4.10 LiS/CAl VeX)·CCOATING oeNSlTT)/1CO 

### vex) ......•........... 

## so.00 

### x fRCJI 1lO1 COATING DENSITY ••••••• 8.20 liS/GAL FROM MOl
USAGE RAtES

. 144.00 GAJ./YR fRat NOI 0.14 GAL/HI (GAl/YR)/{HOURS/DlY)/(DAYS/WEEK)/(WEECS!TR)
:lOSS FROM DIP TANK•••• 40.00 X FRCIll 1101,

HClJRS of OPERATJOII ijQURS PER DAy ••••••••••••.• 

### a HWISIDAT FRQI 1101 DAYS PER WEEr •••••••••••••• 5 I)AYSI\IEEl F ItCJl 1101**~E~S** PER YEAR ••••••••••••• 52 \oE£(S/TEAR FRCJI 1101 

### HOuRs PERYEAR ..•...••••••. 1000 HOURS/YW FtOM 1101, INTERMITTENT OPf'ATION' FEW IlOlJIS ADAY DURING DAY SHIFT ONLY



### 4.2.4-887......TROlLED AJilD UIIICClNTROL1.ED EJUSSIOll ESTIMATES FOR: FILii: 170' DATE: AOO-28-9O TIMe: 9:00 AM

SCLIlcE: PAIIlT SPRAT SOOTH 1 • PAINT SPlATING OPEJlATtQal alMPAJIT IIAM£: OfJ'T. Of THE AU fOlCE LOCATtON: KILL AF8
- 8lJ1UlIIllG 1701 CONTROlLED UMCCNTROl.W
HClJR1.Y AlillUAl POLLUTAJiT l.SS/Hl GRAMS/SEC TONS/Yll GRAMS/SeC CNTRI. LBS/KR TONS/Til


### voc: non ICETKANE 0.70 0.09 0.35 0.01 0.00 0.70 0.35

AP-42 faJRTH EOlTlOII SEP1. 

## 1m VOLL.ME SECTION 4 EVAPClRATIOll LOSS St1JRCES 4.2SURFACE COATING TABLE 4.2.2.'-1 VOC EIUSSIOllS fOR UNCONTROlLED SURFACI: COATING PAlllT TYPE: PAINT

CCJMNlS
YOC

### non METWE •••••••••••• 5.80 LIS/GAL AlClC NOI**V(~)** CYCC CONTENT)••••• 78.80 X (YCCOEMISTY Of COATIIIGS)/CCQATING DEIlSITT)·100 COATINC Of

..S1TY ••••••• 7.36 l.8S/lal DEFAULT VALUE FROM TALBE 4.2.2,'-1

USAGE ItAlES

. 120.00 GAL/TR FRCIC 1101 0.12 GA1./HR (GAl./lR)/CHOURSIOAT)/CDATS/WEEr::)/(WEEr::S/YR)

lIQJRS OF QP£RATIQN
HOURS PER DAy •••••••••••••• 

### a HClJRS/DAT FROM 1101 DAYS PER WEEK •••••••••••••• 5 DAT5MEK FRCIC 1101 WEEr::S PEll TEAR ••••••••••••• 52 WE£(S/TUI FRCJt 1101 HOURS PER TEAl ••••••••••••• 1000 HOUIlS/YEAR FROM 1101, IIlTERMITTENT oPERATIONFEW HOURS AOAT DUAING DAY SHIFT ONLY



# - 4.2.4-888'.LLED ANO UtlCCIfTROLlEO EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR; FILE DATE 

### TIME -17'01 AUG·28-9Q 9:00 AM
SWRCE. PAINT SPRAy 8COTH 3 - PAINT SPlATING ePERATION lX»IPANY NAME: D£PT. OF THE AIR FORCE LOCATIOW: KILL AF.

- BUILDING 1701 COIlTROLLm UIlCONTROU.ED

POLLUTANT lIS/HR HClJRLY CRAMS/lifC TONS/YR AIlIlUAL GIAI4S/SEC XOIT1L LBS/IIR TOIlS/YR 'IOC 

### non METHAJlE 4.64 0.508 2.32 0.01 0.00 4.64

AP'42 FCURTN EDITION SUT. 1985 VOI.LIE 1 SEc:TIOII 4 EVlPQRATlOli LOSS saJIl.CES 4.2.SURFACE COATING TAau.4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISS[OIIS UNCOtTROlLEO**SUlFA~** COATIIiG PAIIIT TYPE: 

### vee CONTEWT OF PAINT RANGED 3.2TO 5.8 UBS/GAl



## vee non METHANE •••••••••••• 

## vex) {YDC CONTENT)••••• COATIIiG DENSITY ••••••• I,ISAGE RATES••••••••••••••••• 

# ,­

n.xJRS Of OP£RATlOll 

### HOURS PER OAT •••••••••••••• DAYS PER WEft •••••••••••••• 

### WEEXS PERYEAR •••••••••••.. HOURSPER YEAR ••••••••••••• 5.80 L.IS/GAL 7'8.80 7.36 LSS/GAL
800.00 GAL./Tl

0.80 GAL/HI

8 IICUlS/DAY 5 DAYS/WEEI:: 52 1oUK'S/YiAR 1000 HClJRSIYEAR (XlIIIIIEIiTS FROC MOl. ASSUIED NIGMEST VALUE (YOC OEIiISTT OfCOATII1GS)/CCCATIIIG DENSITT,·100 DEFAULT VALUE FROM TAlBE 4.2.2.1-1
FRCM NOI (GAL/YR)/CMOURSIDAY)/COATS/WEEK)/CWEEKS/YR)

FICIC 1101 FRCM 1101 flClM 1101 FQ NO[, INTERMITTE11T OPfUTlOII' FEll HQJt$ AOAT IXJllllC OAT SMlfT ONL.Y



### 4.2.4-889'ROLLED AND UMCOlITROlLED aUSSIDeI ESTIMATES fOR: FILE 1101 DATE AUCi'28-90 

### TIME 9:00 AM

saJRC£: BAn: OVEN· USAGf: LOSS FROMDIP TANIC COMPAY,. 1IlAMC: OEPT. Of THE AIR FORd: LOCATIOM: HILL AFI • BUILDING 1701 COIlTROlL.fI) IlQ.IRLY AIUIUAL POlLUTAAIT LSS/A**GlAMS/~C** TOMS/TR GRAMS/SEC XCNTRL LBS/KR TOItS/TR 'JOe non METHANE

# ............ 0.24 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12·

AP·42 FCJJRTH £DITtON SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 SECTION 4**ev~TlDeI** LOSS SClURCES 4.2**SURf~** COATIIIG TABLE 4.2.2.1·1 VOC EMISSIOIIS FOR UMCtIITItOlLED SURFACE COATINC PAINT TYPE: VARMISH
allElTS 

### vee non

### METHAME ..•..••••••• 4.10 LIS/GAl. Ve%)WeCOATIMG DENSITY)!100 

## vex) ..........••.•••.. COATING DENSITY ••••••• 50.00 

### 8.20 X LIS/GAL flCll MOl FROM 101
USAGE RATES••••••••••••••••• 144.00 GAlIYR FICII MOl 0.14 liAL./Ma eGAL/TX)!(HOURS/OATl!eDAYSIWEEK)/CWEEICS/TR) .Gf LOSSAT DIP TAMK•••••• 40.00 X FROM MOl,
HaJtS OF ClPfRATlClM HouRS PER DAy •••••••••••••• OATS PER**~EK** •••••••••••••• WEEKS PER TEAR ••••.•...•.•• 

## a 5 5Z MCUlS/DAY DAYS/WEK WEfItSITUl FIICJI 1101 FRCI' MOl FICII MOl HOURS PER YEAR ••••..•.••••• 1000 IIOJR$/TW FROM MOl, INT£RICITTENT**OPE~TtOll** Few HOURS ADAY DUlING OAT SNIFT OILY



### 4.2.4-890COIlTROLLEtI AIlD UNCONTROLLED EMISSIOIII ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 1701 OATE: AUG·28-90**~:oc !~** 

SWRCE: BArE ClYEtI • MATVUL CAS FIRED ctWAJlY IlAICE: DePT. Of TKE AU fORCE LOCATION: HILL AFB • BUILDING 1701

COMTROLLED UNCONTROLLED HClJRLY AIiIlUAL POl.LUTANT LBS/1tR GlW(S/SCC TONS/YR GlWCS/SEC XOITRL lBS/HR TONS/TR TOTAL PARTICULATE........... 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 PM-10 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 SOX............•••• 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

### MOl......................... 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 

### 0.lO 0.10 CO............................................... 0.Q4. 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 VOC, NON·METHANE............ 

### 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 VOC, METIIAIIE................ 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00

/·42 FQUaT" EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME UCTION , EXTElMALCCtClIUSTlON SCUtCES 1.4 MATUIAl. GAS alMIUSTION TABLE 1.4" UNCOIfTROlL£l) EMISSION FACTORS FOR IlATlJIlAL GAS COMBUSTJOII FUEL TYPE: NATURAl GAS

EMISSION FACTOR INLB PB. MILl.ION OJIIC FEET TOTAL PARTICULATE••••••••••• 

### 5.00 LS/MM Fn TULE 1.4-1 

### PM-10 ••••••••••.....••••••• 5.00 La"" F13 TA8LE 1.4-1 SOx••••.••••••••••••.••..••• 0.60 La"" FT3 TA8l.E 1.4-' KOx................................................. 100.00 La""H3 TABLE 1.4-1 

### ca................................................., 20.00 LB/* F13 TAitE 1.4·1 VOC, NON·METKANE•••••••••••• 5.30 LB/* FT3 TABLE 1.4-1 vee, METHAJlE

................ 2.70 L8/* Fn TABLE 1.4,'

TOTAL POWER AATING•••••••• 2000.00 KBTU/HR FROM NOl FUEL CONSUlPTlOli RATES•••• 0.00 MM FT3/KR CTOTAL POWER RATING)/C1000 BTU/FT3)/CMM) 

### 2.00 )1M FT31Y1t (TOTAL POWEi RATING)/C1000 8TV/FT3)/(MM)* (ANNUAL OPERATING KOUR)
"elliS OF OPERATlQj

,.

### ..-'-**'~** PER DAy••••••••••••• 

## a.oo HIS/DAT 

### DAYSPERWEE[•••••••••..•. 5.00 DAYS/WEEK WEEKS PER yEAR•••••••••••. 52.00 WEBS/YI HOURS PER yEAR•••••••••••• 1000.00 HRS/TI! FROM 1601, INTERMITTENT CP£AATIOW· FEW HOURS ADAY DURINGDAY SHIFT OWLY 

### 4.2.4-891