alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2365 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2365

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work 
        in honor of Gold Star Families, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Mothers Family Monument 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK.

    Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United Sates Code, the 
authority provided by section 2859 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-
239; 126 Stat. 2164; 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) shall continue to apply 
through January 2, 2027.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2365

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work 
        in honor of Gold Star Families, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Corning Natural Gas
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2009
(the “Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael I.
German, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and I, Firouzeh
Sarhangi, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company for such
period.




Dated:  May
      15, 2009/s/
      MICHAEL I. GERMANMichael
      I. German,Chief
      Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)




/s/
      FIROUZEH SARHANGIFirouzeh
      Sarhangi,Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Clara T. BICKERTON and Edward H. Bickerton, her husband, Appellants, v. David M. SIMS, M.D., and William B. Welch, M.D., Appellees.

No. 69-407.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 24, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Charm Communications Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, He Dang, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 3, 2011



By:

/s/ HE DANGName:

He DangTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the
company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



108
Exhibit 31.1

UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLC

Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Steven Green certify, that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of United Maritime Group, LLC; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLCBy:

/s/ Steven GreenSteven GreenChief Executive Officer
(duly authorized signatory and principal
executive officer of the Company)Date: April 29, 2011
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellate case name: Cornelius Milan Harper v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00641-CR

Trial court case number: 11-DCR-056513

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

On August 13, 2015, this Court abated the appeal and directed the trial court to conduct a 

hearing to determine whether portions of the reporter’s record were inaccurate and, if so, whether 

the reporter’s record could be corrected. We ordered the trial court to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing findings of fact and conclusions of law within 30 days. 

The trial court has held a number of hearings and has appointed a certified court reporter 

to attempt to prepare a corrected reporter’s record. A corrected reporter’s record was tendered to 

this Court on September 26-27, 2016. On September 29, 2016, the trial judge asked for an 

extension of time until November 7, 2016, so that, after the parties review the corrected record, a 

hearing can be held to address whether the record may be certified and filed together with the 

trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

We GRANT the trial court’s request and extend the deadline until November 7, 2016 for 

the filing of the corrected reporter’s record and the supplemental clerk’s record containing the 

trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually 

Date: October 4, 2016
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PUSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Norman J. Szydlowski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SemGroup Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2011



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Norman J. Szydlowski             
|Norman J. Szydlowski                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
#### James Lee HARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-161.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 of Cenovus
Energy Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2016, relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Cenovus Energy Inc., which comprise the Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and the Consolidated
Statements of Earnings, Comprehensive Income, Shareholders Equity and Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and the related notes and to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of Cenovus Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2015, which appears in this Annual Report.

We also consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-163397), Form F-3D (File No. 333-202165), and Form F-10 (File No. 333-196696) of Cenovus Energy Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2016
referred to above. We also consent to reference to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP under the heading Interests of Experts, which appears in the Annual Information Form included in this Annual Report on Form 40-F, which is incorporated by
reference in such Registration Statements.



|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Calgary, Alberta

February 11, 2016
#### David RHEAUME, Jr., and Jose Rodriguez, Appellants, v. Ann LASHEN, Appellee.

No. 69-357.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 24, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
M A N D A T E

TO THE 288TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, on June 28, 2021, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between IN THE INTEREST OF H.M., A CHILD, Appellant, No. 08-21-00086-CV and

, Appellee, was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words: The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed. WITNESS, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of El Paso, this October 29, 2021. Elizabeth G. Flores, Clerk

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-06431
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 22

- 00399

- CV

__________________ STILL AMERICAN, LLC , Appellant
V.
BARON GLOBAL DISTRIBUTORS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 22

- 10

- 146 37

- CV

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Still American, LLC , a ppellant, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this
accelerated appeal as moot

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant filed the
motion before the appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISM I SSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on February 1, 2023 Opinion Delivered February 2, 2023 Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cellular Dynamics International, Inc. (the Company)  on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy D. Daley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: April 30, 2015





/s/ Timothy D. DaleyTimothy D. DaleyVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated October 20, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2093 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-257955) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 20, 2021
EXHIBIT 31.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, William M. Clancy, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Vishay Precision Group, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b) [ Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-54942 ]




(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Dated: March 24, 2011

/s/ William M. ClancyWilliam M. ClancyChief Financial Officer


---
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Peter Henry CLAYTON, Appellee.

No. 77-1537.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Richard E, Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

A. John Goshgarian and Howard J. Hoch-man, Miami, for appellee.

Before NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *State v. Dayton,*215 So.2d 87 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); *Glasgow*v. *State,*292 So.2d 370 (Fla.4th DCA 1974); *State v. Barnett,*344 So.2d 863 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).
# Multiyear Plan

# Instructions

&10Page &P		

# Sheet4
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. CARL OS ALBE RT O A RAM BULGA R C I A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 10469 D. C . No . 4 : 1 0 - c r - 0 3 8 3 9 - C KJ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona C i ndyK . J or ge ns on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a r l os A lbe rt o A r a m bul - G a r c i aappe a l s f r om hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on a nd 63- m onth s e nt e nc e f

orr e e ntrya f

t e rde port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), A ram bu l -G ar ci a’ s c ou nsel 

# FI LED MA Y21 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 10469 2 h a s f ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th e r e a r e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w ith d r a w a s c o u n s e l o f

r e c o r d . W e h a v e p r o v id e dth e ap p e llan t th e o p p o rtu n ityto fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
No. 72-1136.

#### Weatherford et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65288-65289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-89] and [Docket No. 50-163]


Notice of Application for Decommissioning Amendment General 
Atomics;Triga Mark I Research Reactor and Triga Mark F Research Reactor

    Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
(the Commission) has received an application from General Atomics dated 
April 18, 1997, for a license amendment approving the decommissioning 
plan for the TRIGA Mark I (Facility License No. R-38) and TRIGA Mark F 
(Facility License No. R-163) research reactors

[[Page 65289]]

located at General Atomics' site in San Diego, California.
    A copy of the application is available for public inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, at 2120 L 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day of December 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Seymour H. Weiss,
Director, Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project Directorate, 
Division of Reactor Program Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-32415 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P