alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Florida BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, Appellant, v. PINETA COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee. The FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, Appellant, v. Lloyd K. JOHNSON, and Marion Johnson, his wife, Appellees. The FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, Appellant, v. WAKULLA SILVER SPRINGS COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 73-438, 73-439, 73-531.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 18, 1973.

Ross A. McVoy, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Kent, Durden & Kent, Jacksonville, for appellees.

Before CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

CARROLL, Judge.

The appellees who are upland owners of property adjoining submerged lands owned *127by the state and held in trust by the appellant, filed actions seeking judgments declaring the location of the boundary line separating their lands from the state lands and to quiet title to their lands within the boundaries as established by such judgments. The complaints alleged that as to the location of the “mean high tide line” marking the limit of the ownerships there was uncertainty and dispute, because of certain reasons and circumstances therein stated. After answers were filed by defendants and proceedings for discovery were had and the causes had been set for trial, the defendant sought a dismissal of the complaints on the ground of failure to state a cause of action, contending lack of jurisdiction of the circuit court for determination of boundary disputes in the actions which were to quiet title, and claiming sovereign immunity. The motions to dismiss were denied, and defendant appealed the several orders so entered.

On consideration of the complaints and the briefs of the parties we hold no reason in law has been shown to disturb the order of the trial court denying the motions to dismiss. The dispute between the litigants as to the location of a variable boundary line involved their respective claims to ownership of the same land to some extent. The circuit court had jurisdiction over the controversy presented by the complaint, under Art. V, § 6(3) Fla.Const. F.S.A. and § 65.061 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; and the complaint made a case for declaratory judgment, for determination of a “fact upon which the existence or nonexistence of such * * * right does or may depend” (§ 86.011(2) Fla.Stat., F.S. A.), and in view of expressed doubt of plaintiffs regarding their rights under deeds (§ 86.021 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.). In the circumstances presented the actions were maintainable against the State Board, under § 69.041 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; and see State Road Department v. Tharp, 146 Fla. 745, 1 So.2d 868.

Affirmed.
### The following outline covers new requirements that are under consideration for new and revised SAE J Standards. 

## DRAFT June 9, 2009
Recommendations for the routing and circuit connect ions in the engine

compartment of the vehicle

09 Jun. 09 1 The SAE International Interior Climate Control Stan dards Committee is currently revising existing J Standards and developing new J Standards for Mobi le Air Conditioning Systems.

R1234yf refrigerant

1. Refrigerant Fittings shall be located such that in the case of failure, they will not directly spray refrigerant and oil on hot [temperatures exce eding 750oC] surfaces in the engine compartment area (underhood). . All systems compon ents shall be designed to prevent direct impingement of leaking refrigerant and oil o n surfaces hot enough to cause ignition of either the refrigerant or oil.

2. R1234yf refrigeration circuit connections ( bot h single and multiple Evaporator systems) shall be located outside the vehicle passenger comp artment and outside the cabin MAC system air distribution system paths

or
designed such that design-intent leak refrigerant c ircuit components tightness is ensured if inside the passenger cabin or air distribution f low path

3. If the refrigerant circuit has a pressure relief device, it shall be located such that refrigerant and oil does not spray directly on hot [temperatures exceeding 750oC] surfaces in the engine compartment area

4. If hoses and hose couplings are located near hot surfaces in the engine compartment area (underhood), shields shall be placed on the ho t surfaces to assure that surface temperature of the shield shall not exceed 750oC un der all vehicle operating conditions. It is recommended that the heat shield be placed on the lines.

5. The refrigerant circuit components must be route d in such a way that every part of the system is protected by the body structure from obje cts lying on the ground or from direct contact with the ground itself. The pipe and hoses should be carefully designed to avoid any contact or friction to other parts of the vehic le. The circuit components should have sufficient clearance (and/or restraint) to stationa ry and moving parts in the underhood compartment to avoid uncontrolled components leakag e.
6. MAC system Service fittings shall be located for ease of attachment of service hoses and shall not be pointed such that any failures may res ult in direct impingement of refrigerant on the service technician. Piping shall be of robus t design to avoid damage or permanent deformation while connecting / disconnecting the se rvice hose coupling(s) from factory charging and service equipment.
Exhibit 32

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Massachusetts Electric
Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we,
Cheryl W. Grise, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and John H.
Forsgren, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of  the
registrant.

/s/ Cheryl W. Grise
    (Signature)
    Cheryl W. Grise
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

August 6, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 15.1  Consent of Commerce & Finance Law offices, PRC Counsel  IFM Investments Limited 26/A, East Wing, Hanwei Plaza No.7 Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District Beijing Peoples Republic of China  Dear Sir or Madam:  We hereby consent to the references to us by IFM Investments Limited (the Company) under the heading Risks Related to Doing Business in China in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.   Yours faithfully,For and on behalf of/s/ Commerce & Finance Law OfficesCommerce & Finance Law OfficesMay 24, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 97-22]


Bermuda Container Line Ltd. v. SHG International Sales Inc. FX 
Coughlin Co., and Clark Building Systems, Inc., Notice of Filing of 
Complaint and Assignment

    Notice is given that a complaint filed by Bermuda Container Line, 
Ltd., (``Complainant'') against Respondents SHG International Sales 
Inc. (``SHG''), FX Coughlin Co. (``Coughlin''), and Clark Building 
Systems, Inc. (``Clark'') was served November 20, 1997. Complainant 
alleges that (1) Respondent SHG violated sections 8 and 23 or, 
alternatively, section 19, and section 10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act of 
1984 (``the Act''), 46 U.S.C. app. Secs. 1707 and 1721 or 1718, and 
1709(a)(1), by failing to file a non-vessel operating common carrier 
(``NVO'') tariff or bond or performing freight forwarding services 
without a forwarder license, and by concealing the identity of the 
shipper with respect to a shipment from Clark, PA to Bermuda, entering 
into a credit agreement with no intention of paying the freight and 
misrepresenting itself as the shipper; (2) Respondent Coughlin violated 
section 19 of the Act and 46 CFR Secs. 510.21(c), (e) and (f), by 
falsely certifying it had processed the shipment's Bill of Lading 
(``BL'') when it knew or should have known that the BLs designated 
shipper (SHG) could not be a shipper, seeking a commission from 
Complainant by misrepresentation and permitting SHG to use Coughlin's 
forwarding license; and (3) Respondent Clark violated section 10(a)(1) 
of the Act by delivering cargo to Complainant when it knew or should 
have known that SHG had no tariff or NVO bond on file with the 
Commission and failing to inform Complainant of the facts or to pay the 
shipment's freight.
    This proceeding has been assigned to the office of Administrative 
Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence 
within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after 
consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer 
to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing 
shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of 
the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine 
issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn 
statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the 
nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-
examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record. 
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of 
the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by November 
20, 1998, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by 
March 22, 1999.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31032 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
**EXHIBIT 21**

** **

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF**

**HORIZON TECHNOLOGY FINANCE CORPORATION**

**AS OF 12/31/14**

** **

Compass Horizon Funding Company LLC — Delaware Limited LiabilityCompany

Horizon Credit I LLC — Delaware Limited Liability Company

Horizon Credit II LLC — Delaware Limited Liability Company

Horizon Credit III LLC — Delaware Limited Liability Company

Longview SBIC GP LLC — Delaware Limited Liability Company

Longview SBIC LP — Delaware Limited Partnership

Horizon Funding 2013-1 LLC — Delaware Limited Liability Company

Horizon Funding Trust 2013-1 – Delaware Trust

HPO Assets LLC — Delaware Limited Liability Company
Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Public Service Company of New
Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl
W. Grise, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and John H. Forsgren,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Cheryl W. Grise
    (Signature)
    Cheryl W. Grise
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

August 6, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and
will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
5/11/2023 5/12/2023 5/15/2023 5/16/2023 5/17/2023

Treasury Bills Net -17 -11 -6 4,987 -11

Treasury Notes Net 0 0 -34,799 0 0

Treasury Bonds Net 0 0 26,711 0 0

Marketable Inflation Compensation 00000

Marketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment 201 201 602 201 202

Total Marketable Activity 184 190 -7,492 5,188 191

Airport and Airway Trust Fund 00000

Civil Service Retirement and Disability Trust Fund 00000

Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund 1 1 1,587 -1 0

Department of Defense Medicare Eligible Retiree Fund -78 -11 301 -17 -16

Employees' Health Benefits Fund -342 688 204 -32 -272

Employees' Life Trust Fund -61 44 6 -3 -14

Exchange Stabilization Fund 33833

Deposit Insurance Fund -2 -5 11 -3 1

Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund 561 193 466 1,363 -817

FHA, Mutual Mortgage Insurance Capital Reserve Account, HUD 0 0 9 -1 0

Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund 138 -360 433 2,194 696

Federal Old-Age And Survivors Insurance Trust Fund 3,268 775 2,725 7,960 -20,943

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund -575 -3 -351 -112 6,113

Foreign Service Retirement And Disability Fund 00000

Highway Trust Fund 19 -721 59 -780 19

National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund 0 -10 118 0 0

Deposits, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Bonus Bids, MMS 00000

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 58 -6 172 0 -4

Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund 00000

Postal Service Fund 149 -1,348 -218 304 -43

Railroad Retirement Account 41 46 403 59 15

Thrift Savings Fund -1,719 -133 6,353 -15,320 14,087

Unemployment Trust Fund -194 83 56 -53 -113

Nonmarketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment 143 144 434 145 144

Nonmarketable Inflation Compensation 00000

All Other Trust Funds -54 -8 -681 474 86

Total Government Account Series (Net) 1,355 -627 12,094 -3,821 -1,059

Certificates of Indebtedness -2 -6 -7 8 -2

Discount Adjustment -1,630 520 1,425 -1,451 523

Domestic Series 11411

Foreign Series 00000

State and Local Government Series 138 -34 -5,987 128 390

Tax and Loss Bonds 00000

United States Savings Bonds -46 -43 -37 -54 -45

Total Non-Marketable Activity (Net) -184 -190 7,492 -5,188 -191

Daily Public Debt Activity 00000

Total Public Debt Subject to Limit 31,381,438 31,381,438 31,381,438 31,381,438 31,381,438

Daily Extraordinary Measures 

Investments Suspended (-)/Reinvested (+) -2,139 -1,184 5,949 -16,074 14,483

Daily Debt Subject to Limit Activity

($ millions)
Date

Impacted

Funds

Measures 

Authorized

Measures 

Used

Measures 

Remaining

CSRDF/PSRHBF 1/ 23 (23) 0

G Fund 295 (220) 75

ESF 17 0 17

Totals* 335 (243) 92

1/ Includes Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, and Postal 

Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. Assumes Debt Issuance Suspension 

Period (DISP) ends on June 5, 2023. Measures authorized includes the 

value of early redemptions, which will decrease by roughly $4 billion on 

June 1, 2023.

DEBT SUBJECT TO LIMIT 

EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES

($ billions)

5/17/2023

*Differences may occur due to rounding.
#### OSCEOLA FARMS COMPANY and Employers Service Corporation, Petitioners, v. Thomas WILSON and Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43280.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
No. 00-7468.

#### de la Cruz *v.*Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31653]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-175-006]

Mojave Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

November 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 24, 1997, Mojave Pipeline Company 
(Mojave) tendered for filing a compliance filing pursuant to the 
Commission's Order on Initial Decision issued November 3, 1997 in this 
proceeding.
    Mojave states that the filing contains workpapers demonstrating 
that the calculation of the adjusted cost of service in compliance with 
the order results in rates higher than the currently effective tariff 
rates.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31653 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### C. D. BENEFIELD v. MILCHEM, INC. George RATCLIFF v. MILCHEM, INC., et al.

No. 53601.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1973.

In re: Milchem, Inc. and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vermilion. 281 So.2d 771, 281 So.2d 778.

Writ denied. Under the facts found, there is no error of law.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2


       CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cox
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I,
Jimmy W. Hayes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                              /s/ Jimmy W. Hayes
                              --------------------------------------
                              Name:  Jimmy W. Hayes
                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
                              Date:  November 12, 2002
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph J. Sum, certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Continental MaterialsCorporation;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and materials weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: November 13, 2006
|        | By:    | /s/ Joseph J. Sum                           |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Joseph J. Sum                               |
|   |   | Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended January 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, L.M. (Theo) de Kool, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ L.M. (Theo) de Kool                             
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|January 31, 2005