alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Public Service Company of New
Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl
W. Grise, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and John H. Forsgren,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Cheryl W. Grise
    (Signature)
    Cheryl W. Grise
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

May 7, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and
will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
August 4, 2006  Northeast Utilities
107 Selden Street
Berlin, CT 06037  We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the Company) for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report dated August 4, 2006 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph related to significant charges recorded in connection with the Companys decision to exit certain business lines and the presentation of certain components of the Companys generation business as discontinued operations); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-34622, 33-40156, and 333-128811 on Forms S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-63023, , 333-63144 and 333-121364 on Forms S-8 of Northeast Utilities.  We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


|    |                      
|--- | ---------------------
|/s/ | Deloitte & Touche LLP
|    | Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.    /s/Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  November 7, 2008    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0096

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

HARLAN GERALD VASKA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 21, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 13 2023

07/13/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0096
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

ONYX SERVICE & SOLUTIONS, INC. 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K/A  for the period  ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary Passalaqua, Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mary Passalaqua and will be retained by Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 Dated: March 2, 2011

 

By: /s/ Mary Passalaqua

Mary Passalaqua

President, CEO

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

ONYX SERVICE & SOLUTIONS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Onyx Service& Solutions, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K/A  for the period  ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret Burton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Margaret Burton and will be retained by Onyx Service & Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

  

 Dated: March 2, 2011

 

By: /s/ Margaret Burton

Margaret Burton

Secretary; Director; Chief Financial Officer
#### Vincent Carnell MYERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 13, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Theodore E. Mack, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the Court on appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court, Duval County, adjudicating Defendant guilty after trial by jury of robbery by use of a firearm and sentencing him to thirty (30) years imprisonment. The public defender has filed an *“Anders’*Brief”1 and by Order of this Court, Defendant was allowed additional time within which to file such brief on his own behalf as he deemed advisable.

Review of the briefs and the transcript and record of the proceedings below reveal no error.

Accordingly, judgment below is AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

1

. *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2003 and for the period then ended.





|/s/ Thos. E. CappsThos. E. Capps
President and Chief Executive Officer 
November 7, 2003
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        



|/s/ Thomas N. ChewningThomas N. Chewning
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer 
November 7, 2003
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Consolidated Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Consolidated Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan of up to $1.948 billion to JetBlue 

Airways Corporation (the Company), one of the largest domestic airlines in the United States. 

Treasury originally agreed to make a loan of up to $1.14 billion to the Company, and on 

November 3, 2020, Treasury increased the maximum loan amount to $1.948 billion. The 

Company had approximately 23,000 U.S. employees in March 2020 and carried more than 42 

million passengers in 2019. 

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(1) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is secured by the Company’s TrueBlue loyalty 

program, certain aircraft, and engines. The loan has an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 2.75% 

and matures on September 29, 2025. The Company elected to draw $115 million at close and 

may draw the remaining loan funds in multiple draws through May 28, 2021. The loan proceeds 

will be used to provide liquidity to continue the Company’s operations. The transaction 

agreement includes covenants by the Company to comply with certain restrictions on employee 

compensation, stock repurchases, dividends, and reductions in employment levels, as required by 

the CARES Act. Treasury will receive warrants to purchase common stock equal to 10% of the 

total loan amount drawn.
Order filed March 16, 2016

 In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00408-CV

____________

RUDY GUILLEN AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellant

V.

U.S. BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1059227

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed May 15, 2015. Our review has determined that a relevant 

item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does 

not contain Trial court order setting supersedeas bond pursuant to Texas Property Code 

24.007 filed April 30, 2015.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or 

before March 22, 2016, containing Trial court order setting supersedeas bond pursuant to 

Texas Property Code 24.007 filed April 30, 2015.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a 

part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
#### In the Matter of Perley J. Thibodeau, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority et al., Respondents.

[737 NYS2d 276]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered January 30, 2001, which denied petitioner’s application to annul the determination of respondent State Division of Human Rights of no probable cause to petitioner’s claim of disability discrimination against the New York City Housing Authority based on its failure to provide adequate elevator service in petitioner’s building, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The *proceeding*was *properly*dismissed upon a record showing that the building’s elevators received regular routine maintenance, with any problems being promptly addressed, and *391that petitioner had ample opportunity to submit evidence to show otherwise. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2014

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/27 3/31 4/3 25.00 25.00 23.00 25.00 115.00 -17.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 4/3 4/7 4/10 25.00 25.00 23.00 93.00 -20.00

4/10 4/14 4/17 25.00 25.00 23.00 93.00 -20.00

4/17 4/21 4/24 25.00 25.00 23.00 88.00 -15.00

4/24 4/28 5/1 25.00 25.00 23.00 25.00 106.00 -8.00

5/1 5/5 5/8 25.00 24.00 22.00 82.00 -11.00

5/8 5/12 5/15 29.00 24.00 22.00 96.00 -21.00

5/15 5/19 5/22 29.00 24.00 22.00 83.00 -8.00

5/22 5/27 5/29 29.00 24.00 22.00 25.00 103.00 -3.00

5/29 6/2 6/5 29.00 24.00 22.00 77.00 -2.00

6/5 6/9 6/12 30.00 24.00 22.00 81.00 -5.00

6/12 6/16 6/19 30.00 24.00 22.00 81.00 -5.00

6/19 6/23 6/26 30.00 24.00 22.00 25.00 106.00 -5.00

1064.00 1204.00 -140.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

72-DAY BILL Matures 4/24 50.00 -50.00

58-DAY BILL Matures 4/17 45.00 -45.00

66-DAY BILL Matures 5/8 20.00 -20.00

189-DAY BILL Matures 4/24/14 26.00 -26.00

CMB Funds: -141.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 4/3 4/8 4/15 30.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 4/3 4/9 4/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 4/3 4/10 4/15 13.00 0.00 50.42 13.58

5-year TIPS 4/10 4/17 4/30 18.00 0.00

2-year note 4/17 4/22 4/30 32.00 0.00

5-year note 4/17 4/23 4/30 35.00 0.00

7-year note 4/17 4/24 4/30 29.00 0.00

2-year FRN 4/24 4/29 4/30 15.00 0.00 72.15 56.85

3-year Note 4/30 5/6 5/15 29.00 -1.00

10-year Note 4/30 5/7 5/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 4/30 5/8 5/15 16.00 0.00 59.30 9.70

10-year TIPS ® 5/15 5/22 5/30 13.00 0.00

2-year FRN® 5/22 5/28 5/30 13.00 0.00 0.00 26.00

2-year note 5/22 5/27 6/2 31.00 -1.00

5-year note 5/22 5/28 6/2 35.00 0.00

7-year note 5/22 5/29 6/2 29.00 0.00 71.17 23.83

3-year Note 6/5 6/10 6/16 28.00 -1.00

10-year Note ® 6/5 6/11 6/16 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 6/5 6/12 6/16 13.00 0.00 32.00 30.00

2-year FRN® 6/19 6/25 6/27 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

30-year TIPS ® 6/12 6/19 6/30 7.00 0.00

2-year note 6/19 6/24 6/30 30.00 -1.00

5-year note 6/19 6/25 6/30 35.00 0.00

7-year note 6/19 6/26 6/30 29.00 0.00 73.43 27.57

559.00 358.48 200.52

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: -80
TERRY A. GAINES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5159

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 21, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

.

Terry A. Gaines, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General,

Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, B.L. THOMAS

, and ROWE

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                       409
<INVENTORY>                                      4,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,344
<PP&E>                                           8,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,696
<BONDS>                                         15,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,101
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,893
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,365
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,553
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,553
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42


</TABLE>
#### Goodman BANKS, Trustee, Appellant, v. Harry SCHOOLEY et al., Appellees.

No. 72-534.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 6, 1974.

Allen, Knudsen, Swartz, DeBoest, Rhoads & Edwards, Fort Myers, for appellant.

Stewart, Stewart & Jackson, Fort Myers, for appellees.

MANN, Chief Judge.

Banks holds, as trustee, more than 4,000 acres on Little Pine Island in Lee County, It was assessed in 1967, 1968, 1969 and 1970 for $346,400. In 1971 the assessor valued it originally at $2,000,000, and that figure was reduced by the Board of Adjustment to approximately $1,500,000. Banks’ claim that the assessment was “arbitrary, capricious, excessive, unequal and discriminatory,” was held to have been unproved by the trial judge. It is true that the assessment was not shown to be excessive, but it is shown clearly to be arbitrary, capricious, unequal and discriminatory. Banks’ parcel stands alone as the target of the assessor’s reappraisal. The only change in the situation has been a judicial decree fixing its boundaries. The deputy assessor seems to have attributed great weight to this event but we view it as without significance of the -magnitude which would warrant such a drastic increase. The court ruling would appear without significance whatsoever, except for a slight increase in the acreage included within the judgment fixing boundaries. Certainly most landowners get by without judicial declaration of their boundaries, and the assessor’s argument reminds one of the claim that one returned from the State *135Hospital has a superior claim to sanity because he has papers to prove it. In essence, nothing has changed. It is still the same old land.

There is an assertion in the record that “all lands are assessed at just value” hut this is a conclusion without evidentiary force when refuted by all the evidence. It appears that the appellant’s lands have been subjected to discriminatory treatment and that the learned trial judge was in error. Schooley v. Sunset Realty Corp., Fla.App.2d 1966, 185 So.2d 1.

Reversed.

BOARDMAN, J. and COWART, JOE A., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00887-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.J.S., a Child

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00363

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal 

because he qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED April 1, 2020.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET FINANCING ESTIMATES 

Today, the Treasury Department announced net borrowing of marketable 

debt for the July - September 2005 and October - December 2005 quarters. 

Quarter 

Estimated 

Borrowing 

($ billion) 

Estimated 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billion) 

Jul-Sep 2005 $59 $30 

Oct-Dec 2005 $97 $25 

Since 1997, the average absolute forecast error in net borrowing of 

marketable debt for the current quarter is $10 billion and the average 

absolute forecast error for the end-of-quarter cash balance is $9 billion. 

Similarly, the average absolute forecast error for the following quarter is $31 

billion and the average absolute forecast error for the end-of-quarter cash 

balance is $11 billion. 

The following tables reconcile the variation between forecasted and actual 

net borrowing of marketable debt in the April - June 2005 quarter. 

Quarter 

Estimated 

Borrowing 

($ billions) 

Actual 

Borrowing 

($ billions) 

Estimated 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billions) 

Actual 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billions) 

Apr - Jun 2005 ($42) ($79) $20 $33 

Categories 

Chg from 

Nov Estimate 

Receipts +$37 

Outlays +3 

Other +9 

Larger End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

 (13) 

Additional financing details relating to Treasury’s Quarterly Refunding will 

be released at 9:00 A.M. on Wednesday, August 3. The following link 

provides access to Treasury documents related to this Quarterly Refunding. 

(http://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/debt-management/quarterly-refunding/)