alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07-0049-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

AUGUST 9, 2011

EVELYN CLARK, R.N., ROSEANNE RODRIGUEZ, MHS,

and ELIZABETH ORTIZ, MAS,  

                                                                           Appellants 

v.

CYNTHIA SELL, ON BEHALF OF MITCHELL RAY SELL,  

	Appellee

_____________________________

FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2006-536,095; HONORABLE RUBEN GONZALES REYES, PRESIDING

***Memorandum Opinion***

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Evelyn Clark, Roseanne Rodriguez, and Elizabeth Ortiz (the nurses) appealed the trial court’s order denying their motion to dismiss them as defendants in a lawsuit filed by Cynthia Sell, on behalf of Mitchell Ray Sell, for injuries that Mitchell received while under the care of the nurses’ employer, Sunrise Canyon Hospital.   Dismissal was sought upon the basis of §101.106(f) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code which provides for such dismissal if the movant is an employee of a governmental unit, the conduct involved occurred within the general scope of that employee’s employment, and the suit could have been brought against the governmental unit or entity.  TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §101.106(f) (Vernon 2011).  The parties challenged only whether the third condition had been met.  We originally affirmed the trial court’s order of dismissal finding that the suit could not have been brought against the nurses’ employer due to sovereign immunity.  *Clark v. Sell,*228 S.W.3d 873, 875 (Tex. App.– Amarillo 2007).

	Our decision was reversed by the Texas Supreme Court and remanded to us[footnoteRef:1] in light of that Court’s decision in *Franka v. Velasquez,*332 S.W.3d 367 (Tex. 2011).  In *Franka*, the Court held that for purposes of §101.106(f), suit “could have been brought” against a governmental unit entitled to sovereign immunity regardless of whether sovereign immunity had been waived.  *Id.*at 385.  In light of that decision, we reverse the order of the trial court and render judgment dismissing the claims against Clark, Rodriguez, and Ortiz.  TEX. R. APP. P. 43.3.  [1: Clark v. Sell, 332 S.W.3d 366, 367 (Tex. 2011).] 

							Brian Quinn 

							Chief Justice

2
#### SOUTHERN LINE CONSTRUCTORS and Maryland Casualty Company, Petitioners, Cross-Respondents, v. Gloria G. MORRIS and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.

No. 38475.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1970.

E. O. Henry Palermo and Richard G. Davis, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for petitioners-cross-respondents.

George H. Brown, III, of Brown, Ruiz, Watson & Goldstein, St. Petersburg, for respondent, cross-petitioner.

Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.

PER CURIAM:

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission, now Industrial Relations Commission.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose, and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A.

We conclude from our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, record and briefs that the compensation order of the Judge of Industrial Claims fails to meet the standards for findings of fact set by this Court in Brown v. Griffin, 229 So.2d 225 (Fla.1969) and Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, 81 So.2d 503 (Fla.1955).

The record contains no affidavits or evidence of any kind in support of the attorney’s fee award to cross-petitioner’s *517attorney, as required by our decisions in Lee Engineering and Construction Co. v. Fellows, 209 So.2d 454 (Fla.1968), and Anchor Products Co., Inc. v. Rapo, 210 So.2d 446 (Fla.1968).

The order of the Commission must be quashed and the cause remanded, with directions to return the cause to the Judge of Industrial Claims for further findings of fact on the evidence already taken, and such further proceedings as may be necessary to determination and award of an attorney’s fee in accordance with the above-recited cases.

Respondent’s application for attorneys fees is denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 21, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 21, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A2348. SHIRLEY MARTIN et al. v. JASON BILLINGHURST et al..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Willamette Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Willamette PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on Thursday, 
December 11, 1997, at the USDI Salem BLM Office; 1717 Fabry Rd SE; 
Salem, Oregon 97306; phone (503) 375-5642. The Advisory Committee 
meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. to approximately 12:30 p.m. The 
tentative agenda includes: (1) Review of the Province timber sale 
monitoring results, (2) Review and critique of 1997 Willamette PAC 
activities and accomplishments, (3) Identifying and prioritizing topics 
for Willamette PAC meeting in 1998, and (4) Public forum.

    This public forum is tentatively scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. 
Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged. Written comments may be 
submitted prior to the meeting by sending them to Designated Federal 
Official Neal Forrester at the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For more information regarding this meeting, contact Designated Federal 
Official Neal Forrester; Willamette National Forest, 211 East Seventh 
Avenue; Eugene, Oregon 97401; (541) 465-6924.

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
Darrel L. Kenops,
Willamette Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 97-31349 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Anthony DE JERINETT, Appellee.

Nos. 72-975 and 72-1014.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1973.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John J. Blair, State’s Atty., and Richard W. Seymour, Asst. State’s Atty., Bradenton, for appellant.

Gerald C. Surfus, Nelson, Stinnett, Sur-fus, Payne, Hesse & Cyril, Sarasota, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This case presents the comparatively rare instance of the granting of the criminal law’s version of a “summary judgment” in favor of an accused.

Appellee De Jerinett was charged with manslaughter by culpable negligence in the shooting of one Debra L. McNeal. He filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to CrPR 3.190, 33 F.S.A., and attached as exhibits thereto three sworn statements he made to police officers shortly after the shooting. The mandate of *Miranda*was apparently satisfied in the giving of these statements, and appellee relies thereon in support of his motion to establish that no material fact remains to be tried and that, as a matter of law, it appears therefrom that he was not guilty of culpable negligence. The State did not traverse the matters set forth in appellee’s sworn statements and the parties stipulated as to the identity of the deceased and as to the chain of custody of the gun, bullets, etc., involved in the shooting. The deposition of a doctor relating to the cause of death was also submitted. The trial judge, in a brief order granting the motion, apparently determined that “[tjhere are no material disputed facts and the undisputed facts do not establish a prima facie case of guilt against the defendant . . . .” 1 We reverse.

 In essence, the effect of the trial court’s ruling is that, as a matter of law, *127the undisputed facts appearing in De Jeri-nett’s sworn statements conclusively show that he was innocent of culpable negligence. We disagree. We have carefully examined these statements and now determine that it cannot be said that a jury could not properly find culpable negligence. Indeed, resolving all inferences against De Jerinett as we must do in the present posture of this case, a jury could well find such negligence. It would serve no useful purpose at this time to detail the facts as recited in De Jerinett’s statements since, if a full trial ensues, they will be recorded.

Accordingly the order dismissing the information herein should be, and it is hereby, reversed; and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

1

. *See,*CrPR 3.190(c)(4).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40098

Summary Calendar

 

WENDELL K. WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. MILLER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER 3;

J. ALFORD, WARDEN; 

P. ADAMS, PROPERTY OFFICER,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:97-CV-403

- - - - - - - - - -

July 6, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wendell K. Washington, Texas prisoner # 649796, appeals the

district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint for failing to exhaust administrative remedies. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). He has also filed a motion to

supplement the record on appeal.

Washington seeks to supplement the record on appeal with all

docket entries as of January 23, 1998; all subsequent complaints;

all official documentation substantiating his claim; his 
No. 98-40098 

-2-

witnesses statements; and his original amended and all additional

complaints that are part of his statement of facts. To the

extent that these documents are already included in the record,

Washington’s motion is unnecessary. The only documents that

Washington has presented to this court which are not part of the

record pertain to disciplinary action taken against Washington at

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,

Eastham Unit. These documents are not relevant to whether

Washington has exhausted his administrative remedies, the sole

issue before this court. Washington’s motion to supplement the

record is DENIED. 

Washington contends that he was unable to exhaust his

administrative remedies because he did not receive notice that

his grievances had been denied until the time for filing an

administrative appeal had expired. His allegation does not raise

a valid excuse for failing to exhaust available administrative

remedies. See Wendell v. Asher, 162 F.3d 887, 890-92 (5th Cir.

1998); Underwood v. Wilson, 151 F.3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 1998),

cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1809 (1999). 

Because Washington is seeking exclusively monetary relief,

however, it is possible that he was not required to pursue

administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See Whitley v.

Hunt, 158 F.3d 882, 887 (5th Cir. 1998)(clarifying that under

1997e, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a federal

prisoner need not exhaust administrative remedies that are not

capable of providing redress); see Marsh v. Jones, 53 F.3d 707,

710 (5th Cir. 1995). 
No. 98-40098 

-3-

The district court’s dismissal of Washington’s § 1983

complaint for non-exhaustion is VACATED and the cause REMANDED

for the district court to address whether monetary relief is

available through the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

grievance procedure. 

VACATED AND REMANDED; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD DENIED.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2016

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/31 4/4 4/7 35.00 28.00 24.00 109.00 -22.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 4/7 4/11 4/14 35.00 28.00 24.00 108.00 -21.00

4/14 4/18 4/21 35.00 28.00 24.00 112.00 -25.00

4/21 4/25 4/28 35.00 28.00 24.00 20.00 130.00 -23.00

4/28 5/2 5/5 40.00 28.00 24.00 98.00 -6.00

5/5 5/9 5/12 40.00 28.00 24.00 100.00 -8.00

5/12 5/16 5/19 40.00 30.00 25.00 100.00 -5.00

5/19 5/23 5/26 45.00 30.00 26.00 20.00 123.00 -2.00

5/26 5/30 6/2 45.00 30.00 26.00 103.00 -2.00

6/2 6/6 6/9 40.00 30.00 26.00 103.00 -7.00

6/9 6/13 6/16 40.00 30.00 26.00 103.00 -7.00

6/16 6/20 6/23 40.00 30.00 26.00 20.00 130.00 -14.00

6/23 6/27 6/30 40.00 30.00 24.00 102.00 -8.00

1271.00 1421.00 -150.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 4/7 4/12 4/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 4/7 4/13 4/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 4/7 4/14 4/15 12.00 0.00 73.18 -17.18

5-year TIPS 4/14 4/21 4/29 16.00 -2.00 0.00 16.00

2-year note 4/21 4/26 5/2 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 4/21 4/27 5/2 15.00 0.00

5-year note 4/21 4/27 5/2 34.00 0.00

7-year note 4/21 4/28 5/2 28.00 0.00 109.70 -6.70

3-year Note 5/4 5/10 5/16 24.00 0.00

10-year Note 5/4 5/11 5/16 23.00 0.00

30-year Bond 5/4 5/12 5/16 15.00 0.00 60.09 1.91

10-year TIPS (r) 5/12 5/19 5/31 11.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 5/19 5/25 5/31 13.00 0.00

2-year note 5/19 5/24 5/31 26.00 0.00

5-year note 5/19 5/25 5/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 5/19 5/26 5/31 28.00 0.00 70.61 41.39

3-year Note 6/2 6/7 6/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 6/2 6/8 6/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 6/2 6/9 6/15 12.00 0.00 32.00 24.00

2-year FRN (r) 6/18 6/24 6/26 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

30-year TIPS ® 6/16 6/23 6/30 5.00 -2.00

2-year note 6/23 6/27 6/30 26.00 0.00

5-year note 6/23 6/28 6/30 34.00 0.00

7-year note 6/23 6/29 6/30 28.00 0.00 80.34 12.66

511.00 425.92 85.08

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: -65
#### TAMIAMI ABSTRACT AND TITLE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Fernando RAVELO and Yolanda Gultasca Ravelo, his wife, Appellees.

No. 76-1616.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 30, 1977.

Fogle, Connely & Cook, Miami, for appellant.

Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Niem-oeller & Flynn and Gene H. Auvil, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Company v.*Catts, 79 Fla. 235, 85 So. 364 (1920); *Scheuer v. Balik,*130 Fla. 255, 177 So. 731 (1937); *Shaw v. Hamm,*133 Fla. 722, 183 So. 19 (1938); *Matousek v. Cooper,*111 So.2d 65 (Fla.2nd D.C.A.1959); *Horowitz v. United National Corporation,*324 So.2d 189 (Fla.3rd D.C.A.1975).
[DATE]

Verónica R. Soto

Director

Emergency Rental Assistance Program

U.S. Department of the Treasury

emergencyrentalassistance@treasury.gov

Dear Ms. Soto:

[GRANTEE] (Grantee), [ERA1 GRANTEE NUMBER], writes to request a determination that its claimed ERA1 administrative expenses are related to the delivery of the program for purposes of the presumption discussed in section V of the ERA1 Reallocation Guidance (Guidance).

**About Our ERA Program**

Grantee’s initial allocation of ERA1 funds was $[AMOUNT].  After deducting amounts recaptured or reallocated by Treasury as excess funds, the amount of our ERA1 allocation is $[AMOUNT].  As of our most recent report, Grantee has cumulatively obligated $[AMOUNT] of its ERA1 allocation for the provision of financial assistance and housing stability services on behalf of eligible households. Grantee does not expect to obligate at least 30% of its initial ERA1 allocation for these purposes by September 30, 2022.

Since the launch of its ERA1 program, Grantee has processed a total of [NUMBER] applications for rental assistance.  As of the date of this letter, Grantee has provided a total of [NUMBER] households with rental assistance using ERA1 funds.

**Obstacles to Obligating ERA1 Funds**

[*Briefly discuss any obstacles encountered in obligating 30% of the Grantee’s ERA1 allocation, such as a low cost of housing or limited demand notwithstanding outreach efforts.*] 

**Our Uses of ERA1 Funds on Administrative Expenses**

Grantee has expended $[AMOUNT] of its initial ERA1 allocation on administrative expenses related to program delivery.  All of such expenditures constituted permissible administrative expenses in accordance with all applicable ERA1 guidance and requirements.  That amount was expended on the following type[s] of program-related costs:

*[TYPE OF EXPENSE], $[AMOUNT SPENT ON EXPENSE]*

[*Describe Grantee’s uses of ERA1 funds for this type of administrative expense.  For instance, Grantee might discuss projects funded with ERA1 funds as part of Grantee’s outreach strategy, intaking and reviewing applications, new staff or contractors hired to administer the program, or new software systems acquired to manage ERA1 applications.  Please explain clearly how such expenditures are related to ERA1 program delivery.*]

*[TYPE OF EXPENSE], $[AMOUNT SPENT ON EXPENSE] [IF NEEDED]*

[*See above*]

*[TYPE OF EXPENSE], $[AMOUNT SPENT ON EXPENSE] [IF NEEDED]*

[*See above*]

*[TYPE OF EXPENSE], $[AMOUNT SPENT ON EXPENSE] [IF NEEDED]*

[*See above*]

*[TYPE OF EXPENSE], $[AMOUNT SPENT ON EXPENSE] [IF NEEDED]*

[*See above*]

We look forward to your response.

Regards,

[NAME OF GRANTEE CONTACT]

[GRANTEE]

Encl.

[DESCRIPTION OF ENCLOSED DOCUMENT(S)]

1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS

Report Request ID: 799406 Report Code: AMP450 Oct. 14, 2010

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: FMC

State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

04 021 3012 81102 1992 2010

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

EVENTS PROCESSING

MERGE PDF FILES

Option Type Option Value

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE

STATE_CODE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

POC

DATES

EDT_ID

Tribal

APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Standard Description

PM10 24-hour 2006
Oct. 14, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 1 of 4

EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES

EDT DESCRIPTION

0

1

2

5

NO EVENTS

EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS INCLUDED

EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED
Oct. 14, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 2 of 4

PM10 Total 0-10um STP (81102) Arizona Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C) (001)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

04-021-3012

04-021-3012

04-021-3012

04-021-3012

04-021-3012

04-021-3012

04-021-3012

04-021-3012

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0865

0865

0865

0865

0865

0865

0865

0865

Kearny

Kearny

Kearny

Kearny

Kearny

Kearny

Kearny

Kearny

Pinal

Pinal

Pinal

Pinal

Pinal

Pinal

Pinal

Pinal

54964 E 

FLORENCEKELVIN HWY

54964 E 

FLORENCEKELVIN HWY

54964 E 

FLORENCEKELVIN HWY

54964 E 

FLORENCEKELVIN HWY

54964 E 

FLORENCEKELVIN HWY

54964 E 

FLORENCEKELVIN HWY

54964 E 

FLORENCEKELVIN HWY

54964 E 

FLORENCEKELVIN HWY

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

063

062

062

000

063

063

063

063

100

34

35

82

65

52

51

46

N

N

N

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

VALID

DAYS

61

61

61

61

60

61

61

61

DAY

MAX

>150

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

50

61

58

56

56

58

57

29

%OBS

82

100

95

92

93

95

93

48

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

89

32

33

44

53

44

49

34

74

28

33

43

48

37

42

32

51

28

32

37

48

37

42

30

EST

DAYS

>150

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

23.5*

14.8 

17.6 

22.7 

23.1 

20.9 

22.7 

20.4*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN

50

61

58

56

56

58

57

29

NUM

REQ
Oct. 14, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 3 of 4

81102

81102

81102

000

062

063

MULTIPLE METHODS

HI-VOL-WEDDING-INLET

HI-VOL SA/GMW-1200

MULTIPLE METHODS

GRAVIMETRIC

GRAVIMETRIC

PARAMETER

METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD

METHODS USED IN THIS REPORT
Oct. 14, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 4 of 4

PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT

PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION

0865 Pinal County APCD
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of December meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board will meet on Friday, 
December 19, 1997, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. in Room 7C13 of the General 
Accounting Office building, 441 G St., NW., Washington, DC.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the following issues: (1) 
Natural Resources; (2) Credit Reform proposed amendments; (3) Social 
Insurance; (4) follow-up issues from the public hearing on accounting 
for internal use software of December 18; and (5) the addition of new 
projects for 1998.
    Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. Board 
discussions and reviews are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wendy Comes, Executive Director, 441 G St., NW., Room 3B18, Washington, 
DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86 Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 
U.S.C. app. section 10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

    Dated: December 3, 1997.
Wendy M. Comes,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-32192 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M