61294 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 1997 / Notices

Comment 11: Timken argues that the

Department should include a certain

expense in CMC’s direct materials costs

because respondent incurred this

expense.

Department’s Position: We agree with

Timken. Because CMC actually incurred

this expense on its material inputs, it is

appropriate to capture the expenses in

CMC’s direct materials costs. Therefore,

we have included this expense in CMC’s

direct materials costs. See CMC’s final

results analysis memorandum dated

October 29, 1997 for a discussion of

how we captured this expense.

Final Results of the Review

As a result of our analysis of the

comments we received, we determine

the following weighted-average margins

to exist for the period June 1, 1995,

through May 31, 1996:

Manufacturer/

exporter 1

Margin

(percent)

Wanxiang .................................. 0.03

Shandong .................................. 17.76

Luoyang .................................... 2.35

CMC .......................................... 0.39

Xiangfan .................................... 0.39

Guizhou Machinery ................... 21.79

Zhejiang .................................... 0.18

Jilin ............................................ 29.40

Liaoning .................................... 0.17

Premier ..................................... 5.43

Chin Jun .................................... 5.23

PRC Rate .................................. 29.40

1The PRC rate applies to CMEC, Hailin,

Guizhou Automotive, and all other firms which

did not respond to the questionnaire or have

not qualified for a separate rate.

Assessment Rates

The Department shall determine, and

the Customs Service shall assess,

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. With respect to export price

sales for these final results, we divided

the total dumping margins (calculated

as the difference between normal value

(NV) and export price) for each

importer/customer by the total number

of units sold to that importer/customer.

We will direct Customs to assess the

resulting per-unit dollar amount against

each unit of merchandise in each of that

importer’s/customer’s entries under the

relevant order during the review period.

Although this will result in assessing

different percentage margins for

individual entries, the total

antidumping duties collected for each

importer/customer under each order for

the review period will be almost exactly

equal to the total dumping margins.

For CEP sales, we divided the total

dumping margins for the reviewed sales

by the total entered value of those

reviewed sales for each importer/

customer. We will direct Customs to

assess the resulting percentage margin

against the entered Customs values for

the subject merchandise on each of that

importer’s/customer’s entries during the

review period. While the Department is

aware that the entered value of sales

during the POR is not necessarily equal

to the entered value of entries during

the POR, use of entered value of sales

as the basis of the assessment rate

permits the Department to collect a

reasonable approximation of the

antidumping duties which would have

been determined if the Department had

reviewed those sales of merchandise

actually entered during the POR.

The following deposit requirements

will be effective upon publication of

this notice of final results of

administrative review for all shipments

of TRBs entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse, for consumption on or after

the date of publication, as provided by

section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash

deposit rates for the PRC companies

named above that have separate rates

and were reviewed (Guizhou

Machinery, Luoyang, Jilin, Liaoning,

CMC, Zhejiang, Xiangfan, Shandong,

Wanxiang) will be the rates shown

above except that, for firms whose

weighted-average margins are less than

0.5 percent and therefore de minimis,

the Department shall require a zero

deposit of estimated antidumping

duties; (2) for PRC companies (e.g.,

Great Wall) which established eligibility

for a separate rate in this review or a

previous review but for which no

review has ever been requested, the cash

deposit rate will continue to be their

current cash-deposit rate; (3) for all

remaining PRC exporters, all of which

were found to not be entitled to separate

rates, the cash deposit rate will be 29.40

percent; (4) for non-PRC exporters

Premier and Chin Jun the cash deposit

rates will be the rates established above;

and (5) for non-PRC exporters of subject

merchandise from the PRC, other than

Premier and Chin Jun, the cash deposit

rate will be the rate applicable to the

PRC supplier of that exporter. These

deposit requirements shall remain in

effect until publication of the final

results of the next administrative

review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as the only

reminder to parties subject to

administrative protective orders (APO)

of their responsibility concerning the

return or destruction of proprietary

information disclosed under APO in

accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(d) or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and terms of an

APO is a violation which is subject to

sanction.

This administrative review and this

notice are in accordance with section

751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C.

1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.22.

Dated: November 6, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–30147 Filed 11–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Transition Orders; Schedule and

Grouping of Five-Year Reviews;

Comment Request

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Amendment to Notice of

Proposed Schedule and Grouping of

Five-Year Reviews of Transition Orders.

SUMMARY: On October 9, 1997, the

Department of Commerce (‘‘the

Department’’) published a Notice of

Proposed Schedule and Grouping of

Five-Year Reviews of Transition Orders

(62 FR 52686). The Department hereby

amends the original notice. This

amendment does not alter the comment

due date. Comments on the proposed

schedule and groupings continue to be

due in accordance with the December 8,

1997 due date indicated in the original

notice.

Amendment: Comments should be

submitted to the Department at the

following amended address: Robert S.

LaRussa, Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration, Central Records Unit,

Room 1870, U.S. Department of

Commerce, Pennsylvania Avenue and

14th Street, NW., Washington, D.C.

20230. This amends the room number as

published in the October 9 notice. In

addition, the ITC case number on the

antidumping duty order covering large

power transformers from France, as

listed in the Appendix, is amended from

AA–85 to AA–86.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 1997 / Notices 61295

Clarification: After publication of the

October 9, 1997, notice, we received

inquiries concerning the distinction

between groups of orders. In response,

we are providing additional clarification

of the distinction between the groups of

orders and posting it on the IA web site

at: http://www.ita.doc.gov/

importladmin/records/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melissa G. Skinner, Office of Policy, or

Andrew Lee Beller, Central Records

Unit, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, at (202)

482–1560 or 482–0866, or Vera Libeau,

Office of Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, at

(202) 205–3176.

Dated: October 31, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–30146 Filed 11–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 110697C]

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management

Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery

Management Council’s Summer

Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass

Monitoring Committees will hold a

public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on

Thursday, December 4, 1997; the

Summer Flounder Monitoring

Committee will meet from 10:00 a.m.

until noon, the Scup Monitoring

Committee wil meet from 1:00–3:00

p.m., and the Black Sea Bass Monitoring

Committee will meet from 3:00–5:00

p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the Radisson Hotel Philadelphia

Airport, 500 Stevens Drive,

Philadelphia, PA; telephone: 610–521–

5900.

Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery

Management Council, 300 S. New

Street, Dover, DE 19904; telephone:

302–674–2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David R. Keifer, Executive Director,

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management

Council; telephone: 302–674–2331.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

purpose of the meeting is to recommend

the 1998 recreational measures for

summer flounder, scup, and black sea

bass.

Although other issues not contained

in this agenda may come before these

Committees for discussion, in

accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens

Fishery Conservation and Management

Act, those issues may not be the subject

of formal Committee action during this

meeting. Committee action will be

restricted to those issues specifically

identified in the agenda listed in this

notice.

Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible

to people with disabilities. Requests for

sign language interpretation or other

auxiliary aids should be directed to

Joanna Davis at the Council (see

ADDRESSES) least 5 days prior to the

meeting date.

Dated: November 10, 1997.

Bruce C. Morehead,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 97–30122 Filed 11–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 110797A]

Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Receipt of applications for

scientific research permits (1070, 1091,

1097, 1105, 1106) and modifications to

scientific research permits (1039, 1042)

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPC) in

Fort Bragg, CA (1070), the Santa Ynez

River Technicial Advisory Committee

(YTAC) in Santa Barbara, CA (1091),

Resource Management International Inc.

(RMI) in San Rafael, CA (1097), Hagar

Environmental Science (HES) in

Richmond, CA (1105), and Dr. David

Wm. Owens of Texas A&M University

(1106) have applied for scientific

research permits authorizing the take of

endangered or threatened species.

Notice is also given that the Natural

Resources Management Corporation

(NRMC) in Eureka, CA (1039) and

William M. Kier in Sausalito, CA (1042)

have applied for modifications to their

existing scientific research permits.

DATES: Written comments or requests for

a public hearing on any of these

applications must be received on or

before December 17, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The applications and

related documents are available for

review in the following offices, by

appointment:

Application for permits 1070, 1091,

1097, and 1105, and modification

requests for permits 1039 and 1042:

Protected Species Division, NMFS, 777

Sonoma Avenue, Room 325, Santa Rosa,

CA 95404–6528 (707–575–6066).

Application for permit 1106: Director,

Southeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, 9721

Executive Center Drive, St. Petersburg,

FL 33702–2432 (813–893–3141).

All documents may also be reviewed

by appointment in the Office of

Protected Resources, F/PR3, NMFS,

1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring,

MD 20910–3226 (301–713–1401);

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

Permits 1039, 1042, 1070, 1091, 1097,

and 1105: Tom Hablett, Protected

Species Division, NMFS Santa Rosa

Office (707–575–6066).

For Permit 1106: Michelle Rogers,

Office of Protected Resources (301–713–

1401).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: LPC,

YTAC, RMI, HES, and David Wm.

Owens, Texas A&M University, request

permits and NRMC and William Kier

request modifications to permits under

the authority of section 10 of the

Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA)

(16 U.S.C. 1531–1543) and the NMFS

regulations governing ESA-listed fish

and wildlife permits (50 CFR parts 217–

227). These listed species covered by

these permits include: coho salmon

(Oncorhynchus kisutch), steelhead trout

(Oncorhynchus mykiss), loggerhead sea

turtles (Caretta caretta), hawksbill sea

turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata), and

Kemp’s ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys

kempii).

LPC (1070) requests a five-year permit

for takes of adult and juvenile,

threatened, southern Oregon/northern

California coast (SONCC) coho salmon

associated with fish population studies

in Humboldt County drainages within

the Evolutionarily Significant Unit

(ESU). The studies consist of juvenile

coho salmon distribution/abundance

surveys and adult salmon spawner

surveys. ESA-listed juvenile fish are

proposed to be captured, anesthetized,

handled (identified, measured, and

sampled for tissues), allowed to recover

from the anesthetic, and released. ESAlisted adult fish carcasses are proposed