Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 89 / Monday, May 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 25791 

(6) Actions accomplished in accordance 

with the service information specified in 

Table 2 of this AD, before the effective date 

of this AD, are acceptable for compliance 

with the corresponding actions required by 

paragraphs (g)(4) and (g)(5) of this AD. 

TABLE 2—ACCEPTABLE SERVICE INFORMATION

Bombardier Service Bulletin— Revision— Dated— 

601R-30–031 ....................................................................................................................................... Original .................. May 15, 2009. 

601R-30–031 ....................................................................................................................................... A ............................ September 8, 2009. 

601R-30–031 ....................................................................................................................................... B ............................ October 28, 2009. 

601R-30–031 ....................................................................................................................................... C ............................ December 23, 2009. 

(7) Replacing DCUs P/N 622–9820–007, 

622–9820–008, or 622–9820–009 with 

modified DCUs having P/N 622–9820–010, 

and modifying CSUs, are also acceptable for 

compliance with the requirements of 

paragraph (g)(3) of this AD if done before the 

effective date of this AD, in accordance with 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 601R–30–034, dated 

November 19, 2007. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 5: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(h) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: 

Program Manager, Continuing Operational 

Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 

11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516– 

794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC 

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(i) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada Civil 

Aviation (TCCA) Airworthiness Directive 

CF–2009–37, dated September 30, 2009; and 

the service information specified in Table 3 

of this AD; for related information. 

TABLE 3—SERVICE INFORMATION

Service information Revision Date 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–30–031 ........................................................................................ D ............................ February 3, 2010. 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–31–034 ........................................................................................ A ............................ April 10, 2008. 

Bombardier Temporary Revision 2A–46 to Appendix A—Certification Maintenance Requirements 

of Part 2 of the Bombardier CL-600–2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual.

Original .................. July 24, 2009. 

Canadair (Bombardier) Temporary Revision RJ/164–2 to the Canadair Regional Jet Airplane 

Flight Manual CSP A–012.

Original .................. May 14, 2009. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28, 

2010. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10884 Filed 5–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0438; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–265–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet 

Series 700, 701, & 702) Airplanes, 

Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet 

Series 705) Airplanes, and Model CL– 

600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above that would 

supersede an existing AD. This 

proposed AD results from mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information 

(MCAI) originated by an aviation 

authority of another country to identify 

and correct an unsafe condition on an 

aviation product. The MCAI describes 

the unsafe condition as: 

The heating capability of several [angle of 

attack] AOA transducer heating elements 

removed from in-service aircraft has been 

found to be below the minimum requirement. 

Also, it was discovered that a large number 

of AOA transducers repaired in an approved 

maintenance facility were not calibrated 

accurately. 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducer and/or degraded AOA transducer 

heating elements can result in early or late 

activation of the stall warning, stick shaker 

and stick pusher by the Stall Protection 

Computer (SPC). 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducers and/or degraded AOA 

transducer heating elements could 

result in an ineffective response to an 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

25792 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 89 / Monday, May 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

aerodynamic stall and reduced 

controllability of the airplane. The 

proposed AD would require actions that 

are intended to address the unsafe 

condition described in the MCAI. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by June 24, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Bombardier, 

Inc., 400 Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval, 

Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 

514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; 

e-mail thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; 

Internet http://www.bombardier.com. 

You may review copies of the 

referenced service information at the 

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Wing Chan, Aerospace Engineer, 

Avionics and Flight Test Branch, 

ANE–172, FAA, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 

11590; telephone (516) 228–7311; fax 

(516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2010–0438; Directorate Identifier 

2009–NM–265–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We have lengthened the 30-day 

comment period for proposed ADs that 

address MCAI originated by aviation 

authorities of other countries to provide 

adequate time for interested parties to 

submit comments. The comment period 

for these proposed ADs is now typically 

45 days, which is consistent with the 

comment period for domestic transport 

ADs. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On October 16, 2009, we issued AD 

2009–22–12, Amendment 39–16065 (74 

FR 55767, October 29, 2009). That AD 

required actions intended to address an 

unsafe condition on the products listed 

above. 

When we issued AD 2009–22–12, we 

stated that we did not include certain 

actions (the inspection to determine if 

certain transducers are installed and 

replaced if necessary in paragraph (h) of 

this proposed AD) because the planned 

compliance time was not enough to give 

notice as AD 2009–22–12 was issued as 

an immediately adopted rule. We now 

have determined that further 

rulemaking is indeed necessary, and 

this proposed AD follows from that 

determination. 

Relevant Service Information 

Bombardier Inc. has issued Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, 

dated July 7, 2009. The actions 

described in this service information are 

intended to correct the unsafe condition 

identified in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have proposed 

different actions in this AD from those 

in the MCAI in order to follow FAA 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a NOTE within the 

proposed AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

Based on the service information, we 

estimate that this proposed AD would 

affect about 368 products of U.S. 

registry. 

The actions that are required by AD 

2009–22–12 and retained in this 

proposed AD take about 1 work-hour 

per product, at an average labor rate of 

$85 per work hour. Based on these 

figures, the estimated cost of the 

currently required actions is $85 per 

product. 

We estimate that it would take about 

5 work-hours per product to comply 

with the new basic requirements of this 

proposed AD. The average labor rate is 

$85 per work-hour. Required parts 

would cost about $0 per product. Where 

the service information lists required 

parts costs that are covered under 

warranty, we have assumed that there 

will be no charge for these costs. As we 

do not control warranty coverage for 

affected parties, some parties may incur 

costs higher than estimated here. Based 

on these figures, we estimate the cost of 

the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be 

$156,400, or $425 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 89 / Monday, May 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 25793 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Amendment 39–16065 (74 FR 

55767, October 29, 2009) and adding the 

following new AD: 

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2010– 

0438; Directorate Identifier 2009–NM– 

265–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by June 24, 

2010. 

Affected ADs 

(b) This AD supersedes AD 2009–22–12, 

Amendment 39–16065. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. 

Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 

701, & 702) airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 

(Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, and 

Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 

900) airplanes; certificated in any category, 

that are equipped with Thales angle of attack 

(AOA) transducers having part number (P/N) 

C16258AA. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 27: Flight Controls. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

The heating capability of several [angle of 

attack] AOA transducer heating elements 

removed from in-service aircraft has been 

found to be below the minimum requirement. 

Also, it was discovered that a large number 

of AOA transducers repaired in an approved 

maintenance facility were not calibrated 

accurately. 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducer and/or degraded AOA transducer 

heating elements can result in early or late 

activation of the stall warning, stick shaker 

and stick pusher by the Stall Protection 

Computer (SPC). 

This [Canadian] directive mandates a 

periodic inspection of the inrush current to 

verify the AOA heating capability and 

replacement of the inaccurately calibrated 

AOA transducers. 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducers and/or degraded AOA transducer 

heating elements could result in an 

ineffective response to an aerodynamic stall 

and reduced controllability of the airplane. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2009– 

22–12: 

(g) Do the following actions. 

(1) Within the applicable compliance times 

specified in Table 1 of this AD: Measure the 

inrush current of both AOA transducers, in 

accordance with Part A of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 670BA–27–051, dated May 

14, 2009. 

TABLE 1—INITIAL MEASUREMENT

For any AOA transducer that, as of November 13, 2009 (the effective 

date of AD 2009–22–12), has accumulated— Do the initial inrush current measurement— 

Less than 6,500 total flight hours ............................................................. Before the AOA transducer has accumulated 7,500 total flight hours. 

More than or equal to 6,500 total flight hours but less than 7,500 total 

flight hours.

Within 500 flight hours after November 13, 2009 (the effective date of 

AD 2009-22–12), but before the AOA transducer has accumulated 

8,000 total flight hours. 

More than or equal to 7,500 total flight hours .......................................... Within 250 flight hours after November 13, 2009. 

(2) If, during any measurement required by 

paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, an AOA 

transducer is found to have an inrush current 

less than 1.60 amps (‘‘degraded’’ transducer), 

before further flight replace the transducer 

with a new or serviceable transducer, in 

accordance with Part C of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 670BA–27–051, dated May 

14, 2009. Do the measurement specified in 

paragraph (g)(1) of this AD for that 

replacement transducer at the times specified 

in (g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of this AD. 

(i) At the applicable time specified in Table 

2 of this AD if the degraded transducer was 

replaced with a serviceable transducer that is 

not new; or 

(ii) Within 2,000 flight hours after 

replacement if the degraded transducer was 

replaced with a new one. 

(3) If, during any measurement required by 

paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, an AOA 

transducer is found to have an inrush current 

more than or equal to 1.60 amps, repeat the 

measurement specified in paragraph (g)(1) of 

this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 

the applicable interval specified in Table 2 of 

this AD. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

25794 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 89 / Monday, May 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

TABLE 2—REPETITIVE MEASUREMENT INTERVALS

If the last inrush current measurement of the serviceable AOA transducer is— Then repeat the measurement— 

More than or equal to 1.90 amps ............................................................. Within 2,000 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.80 amps but less than 1.90 amps .................... Within 1,500 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.70 amps but less than 1.80 amps .................... Within 1,000 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.60 amps but less than 1.70 amps .................... Within 500 flight hours after the last measurement. 

New Requirements of This AD 

(h) Within 6,000 flight hours after the 

effective date of this AD: Do an inspection to 

determine the serial number of the AOA 

transducer having P/N C16258AA, and to 

determine if the serial number has suffix ‘‘A,’’ 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 

670BA–27–053, Revision A, dated July 7, 

2009. 

(1) If the serial number is not specified in 

paragraph 1.A.(1) of Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, dated 

July 7, 2009, no further action is required by 

this paragraph. 

(2) If the serial number is specified in 

paragraph 1.A.(1) of Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, dated 

July 7, 2009, and the serial number has a 

suffix ‘‘A,’’ no further action is required by 

this paragraph. 

(3) If the serial number is specified in 

paragraph 1.A.(1) of Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, dated 

July 7, 2009, and the serial number does not 

have suffix ‘‘A,’’ before further flight, replace 

the AOA transducer with a serviceable 

transducer, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, 

dated July 7, 2009. 

(i) As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install, on any airplane, an AOA 

transducer having P/N C16258AA with any 

serial number specified in paragraph 1.A.(1) 

of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–27– 

053, Revision A, dated July 7, 2009, unless 

the serial number has a suffix ‘‘A.’’ 

(j) Inspections and replacements 

accomplished before the effective date of this 

AD according to Bombardier Service Bulletin 

670BA–27–051, dated May 14, 2009, are 

considered acceptable for compliance with 

the corresponding actions specified in this 

AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(k) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: 

Program Manager, Continuing Operational 

Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 

11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516– 

794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC 

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(l) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness 

Directive CF–2009–35, dated August 31, 

2009; Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA– 

27–051, dated May 14, 2009; and Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, 

dated July 7, 2009; for related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 29, 

2010. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10887 Filed 5–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0092] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Regulated Navigation Area: Red Bull 

Air Race World Championship, Upper 

New York Bay, Lower Hudson River, 

NJ and NY 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a temporary regulated 

navigation area on the navigable waters 

of the lower Hudson River and Upper 

New York Bay in the vicinity of Liberty 

State Park, New Jersey and Ellis Island, 

New Jersey and New York for the Red 

Bull Air Race World Championship, an 

event scheduled to be held over water. 

This regulation is necessary to protect 

participants and spectators from the 

hazards associated with air races. This 

proposed action is intended to restrict 

vessel traffic in a portion of the lower 

Hudson River and Upper New York Bay 

during the event. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before June 9, 2010. 

Requests for public meetings must be 

received by the Coast Guard on or before 

June 9, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2010–0092 using any one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

• Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail LTJG Eunice James, 

Coast Guard Sector New York 

Waterways Management Division, 

Marine Events Branch; telephone 718– 

354–4163, e-mail 

Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS