alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CONOLOG CORPORATION (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Robert S. Benou and Marc Benou, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Operating Officer and the President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

This certification accompanies this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Conolog
Corporation. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog
Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

                                              /s/ ROBERT S. BENOU
                                              -------------------
                                              Robert S. Benou
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

                                              /s/ MARC BENOU
                                              --------------
                                              Marc Benou
                                              Chief Operating Officer,
                                              President and Secretary

March 22, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.2

UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLC

Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Jason Grant, certify, that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Maritime Group, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over the financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLCBy:

/s/ Jason GrantJason GrantChief Financial Officer
(duly authorized signatory, principal financial officer of the Company)Date: March 30, 2011
#### Steven Carl BOZEMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-778.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Dr. D. C. FOTI et al. v. Joe JOSEPH.

No. 8090.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Nov. 16, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 21, 1970.

Johnnie A. Jones, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Emile C. Rolfs, III, of Durrett, Hardin, Hunter, Dameron & Fritchie, Baton Rouge, for appellees.

Before LANDRY, ELLIS and BLANCHE, JJ.

BLANCHE, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellees, Hanover • Insurance Company and Dr. D. C. Foti, instituted suit against defendant-appellant, Joe Joseph, in the sum of $2,026.12 for damages to a 1965 Cadillac owned by Foti and insured against damage by collision or upset by Hanover. The alleged damages are represented by the cost of repairing the automobile, namely, the sum of $2,026.12, of which amount $1,926.12 was paid by Hanover and $100 paid by Dr. Foti. The plaintiff Dr. Foti alleged that he was traveling in a westerly direction on Louisiana Highway No. 1 approximately one mile west of the city limits of Donaldsonville on Christmas eve night of 1965 when the defendant backed his automobile, a 1962 Chevrolet, from a private driveway into his path, *282thereby creating an emergency and causing the collision.

The defendant answered denying plaintiffs’ allegations and alleged that he was “rear-ended” by the plaintiff while traveling west on Louisiana Highway 1. Defendant then assumed the position of plaintiff in reconvention denying any negligence on his part and further alleging that if he were found to be in any wise negligent in causing the accident that Dr. Foti had the last clear chance and could and should have avoided the accident. Plaintiff in reconvention sought damages for pain, suffering and medical expenses and damage to his automobile in the sum of $29,200. The trial judge accepted plaintiffs’ version of the accident and gave judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant as prayed for. It further dismissed the suit of plaintiff in reconvention at his costs.

Our review of the record convinces us that the evidence amply supports the decision of the trial court and, accordingly, its judgment is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,365
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,385
<PP&E>                                          41,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,627
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,315
<OTHER-SE>                                     255,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               336,882
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,994)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,653)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,653)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
Fonds d’aide aux locataires de la Ville de Boston (Boston Rental Relief Fund)

Auto-attestation des revenus actuels (60 derniers jours)

Veuillez remplir ce formulaire si, au cours des deux derniers mois, vous avez eu des revenus d’emploi que

vous n’êtes pas en mesure de vérifier à l’aide de documents, tels que des talons de chèques de paie (ex.

travail indépendant, salaires payés en espèces, revenus d’une entreprise qui n’existe plus, etc.)

Veuillez choisir l’option suivante qui décrit le mieux votre situation :

❏ Travail indépendant

❏ Revenu en espèces

❏ Salaires d’une entreprise qui n’existe plus

❏ Aucun revenu (y compris les sources suivantes : salaires, heures supplémentaires, emploi à temps

partiel, indemnisations de l’Administration des anciens combattants (VA), revenu brut de location ou

de bail, prestations en espèces, prestations de sécurité sociale)

Si vous êtes un travailleur indépendant ou si vous avez reçu des revenus en espèces ou des salaires d’une

entreprise qui n’existe plus, veuillez déclarer les montants totaux ci-dessous :

Mois Montant Source/employeur

1.

2.

3.

4.

Je comprends que je déclare mes revenus passés et actuels pour le Fonds d’aide au loyer de la Ville de Boston

afin d’établir mon admissibilité et la détermination du montant de l’aide nécessaire  Je déclare sous peine 

parjure que les déclarations ci-dessus concernant le revenu de mon ménage sont vraies, correctes, précises et

complètes à tous égards.

Nom _______________________________________ Date ____________________________________________

Signature électronique ______________________ Adresse _________________________________________
Order entered January 2 7 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00414
- CV
MARY HELEN WILLIAMS
- WHITE, Appellant
V. HENRY M. WHITE BY AND THROUGH ELAIN E FLEMING, GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF HENRY M. WHITE , A ppellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FA
- 12
- 0829 

### O RDER
We ORDER Kelly Ashmore, Grayson County District Clerk, to file , ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 3 , 2014 , a supplemental clerk’s record containing either: (1) the trial court’s order sustaining the court reporter’s contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence; or (2) written verification that no such order exists.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic transmis sion to Kelly Ashmore, The Honorable Rayburn Nall, Judge of the 59th Judicial District Court of Grayson County, Texas, Cindy Bardwell, Official Court Reporter of the 59th Judicial District Court of Grayson County, Texas, counsel for appellee, and by first

- class mail to appellant.We suspend the February 5, 2014 deadline for appellant’s brief. When the Court receives the requested supplemental clerk’s record, the Court will set a new deadline.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### R. R. (Bob) WALDEN, as Tax Assessor of Hillsborough County, Florida, Petitioner, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 44064.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 9, 1973.

Certiorari denied. *277*So.2d 815.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### Fred Willie STURGIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-413.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### W. K. JOURNEY et al. v. Robert Lee KYLE et al.

No. 50562.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 30, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1978.

Appeal from Special Court of Eminent Domain, Leflore County; Seth Wheatly, Jr., Judge.

*620Schissel & Stuckey, Luke J. Schissel, W. S. Stuckey, Jr., Greenwood, for appellants.

Travis H. Clark, Jr., Greenwood, for ap-pellees.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### FIRST NATIONAL REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CORP., a New York corporation, Appellant, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ST. PETERSBURG, a national banking association, Appellee.

No. 72-1005.

District' Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 23, 1973.

James D. Eckert of Baynard, McLeod, Lang, Eckert & Ballard, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Alan C. Sundberg of Masterson, Sund-berg & Rogers, St. Petersburg, for appel-lee.

*29PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on rationale of Horace v. American National Bank and Trust Co., Fla.App. 1971, 251 So.2d 33.

LILES, A. C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EARNEST PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. EARNEST PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. EARNEST PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. EARNEST PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. 

# gab OCT 2't 2014 TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLEW - UPREME COURT BY DEPUTY - CLERK -- No. 66614

No. 66672 " re

No. 66690



### ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are proper person appeals from decisions denying a motion for dismissal, motion to suppress identification, motion to compel disclosure of exculpatory evidence, and a motion for a pretrial evidentiary

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 

### lq-39 - 1, 0Pickering Parraguirre hearing. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying the abovementioned motions, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Earnest Phillips Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OR NEVADA (0) 74 2IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EARNEST PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. EARNEST PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. EARNEST PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. EARNEST PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. 

# gab OCT 2't 2014 TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLEW - UPREME COURT BY DEPUTY - CLERK -- No. 66614

No. 66672 " re

No. 66690



### ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are proper person appeals from decisions denying a motion for dismissal, motion to suppress identification, motion to compel disclosure of exculpatory evidence, and a motion for a pretrial evidentiary

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 

### lq-39 - 1, 0Pickering Parraguirre hearing. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying the abovementioned motions, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Earnest Phillips Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OR NEVADA (0) 74 2
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Oct - Dec

2008 Actual 556 569 (18) 551 (5) 367

Jan - Mar

2009 Actual 565 481 (14) 467 (98) 269

Apr - Jun

2009 Actual 278 343 (17) 327 49 318

Jul - Sep

2009 Actual 415 393 (20) 372 (43) 275

Oct - Dec

2009 Actual 340 260 (3) 258 (82) 194

Jan - Mar

2010 Actual 446 483 (12) 471 25 219

Apr - Jun

2010 Actual 263 344 (10) 334 71 290

Jul - Sep

2010 Actual 362 396 (14) 382 20 310

Oct - Dec

2010 Actual 326 363 (4) 359 33 343

Jan - Mar

2011 Actual 470 265 (20) 245 (225) 118

Apr - Jun

2011 Actual 149 190 (22) 167 19 137

Jul - Sep

2011 Actual 342 286 (23) 264 (79) 58

Oct - Dec

2011 Actual 284 310 2 312 28 86

Jan - Mar

2012 Actual 440 401 (3) 398 (42) 43

Apr - Jun

2012 Actual 129 172 5 177 48 91

Jul - Sep

2012 Actual 234 264 (36) 228 (6) 85

Oct - Dec

2012 Actual 291 297 1 298 7 93

Jan - Mar

2013 Actual 354 349 (8) 341 (14) 79

Apr - Jun

2013 Actual (73) (11) (7) (18) 56 135

Jul - Sep

2013 Actual 205 197 (38) 159 (46) 88

Oct - Dec

2013 Actual 179 264 (11) 253 74 162

Jan - Mar

2014 Actual 275 265 (10) 254 (20) 142

Apr - Jun April 28, 2014 (65) (78) 0 (78) (12) 130

2014 Actual (60) (64) 1 (63) (3) 139

Forecast Revisions 6 14 1 15 9 9

Jul - Sep April 28, 2014 158 169 (11) 158 0 130

2014 August 4, 2014 176 192 (4) 187 11 150

Forecast Revisions 19 22 7 29 11 20

Oct - Dec

2014 August 4, 2014 191 187 (6) 181 (10) 140

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63514-63515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Designation for the State of Minnesota

AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 
(GIPSA), USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GIPSA announces the designation of the Minnesota Department of 
Agriculture (Minnesota) to provide official services under the United 
States Grain Standards Act, as amended (Act).

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998.

ADDRESSES: USDA, GIPSA, Janet M. Hart, Chief, Review Branch, Compliance 
Division, STOP 3604, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 
20250-3604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet M. Hart, telephone 202-720-8525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action has been reviewed and determined 
not to be a rule or regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and 
Departmental Regulation 1512-1; therefore, the Executive Order and 
Departmental Regulation do not apply to this action.
    In the June 30, 1997, Federal Register (62 FR 35147), GIPSA asked 
persons interested in providing official services in the geographic 
area assigned to

[[Page 63515]]

Minnesota to submit an application for designation. Applications were 
due by July 30, 1997. There were three applicants for the Minnesota 
area: Mid-Iowa Grain Inspection, Inc., applied for designation to 
provide official services in the Minnesota counties of Filmore, 
Houston, and Winona; Minnesota applied for designation to provide 
official services in the entire Minnesota area; and Sioux City 
Inspection and Weighing Service Company, applied for designation to 
provide official services in the Minnesota counties of Murray, Nobles, 
Pipestone, and Rock.
    GIPSA requested comments on the applicants for the Minnesota area 
in the September 2, 1997, Federal Register (62 FR 46245). Comments were 
due by October 1, 1997. GIPSA received no comments by the deadline.
    GIPSA evaluated all available information regarding the designation 
criteria in Section 7(f)(l)(A) of the Act and, according to Section 
7(f)(l)(B), determined that Minnesota is better able to provide 
official services in the Minnesota area.
    Effective January 1, 1998, and ending December 31, 2000, Minnesota 
is designated to provide official services in the geographic area 
specified in the June 30, 1997, Federal Register.
    Interested persons may obtain services by contacting Minnesota at 
612-341-7190.

    Authority: Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2867, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
71 et seq.).

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
Neil E. Porter,
Director, Compliance Division.
[FR Doc. 97-31334 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-P
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 426

EX PA R TE R EG I N A LD D O N EL L R I C E , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 3 6 6 - 8 3 0 5 8 - 0 6 I N T HE 3 6 6 J UDI CI AL DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM CO LLI N CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of possession of a
c on tr oll e d s ub sta

nc e and se nte nc e d to lif

e imp ri so nme nt. Th e F if

th Court of Ap pe a ls a ff

ir me d his conviction. Ri c e v . S

tate , No. 05-07-00704- CR (Tex. App. – Dallas, Aug ust 14, 2008, pet. ref ’d ). Applicant conte nds, inte r a lia , that his trial counsel r ender ed inef fec tive assistance beca

use
c ouns e l f a ile d to pr e se rv e iss ue s r e g ard inghis mot ion to s up pr e ss e vid e nc e , an d f a ile d to ob

je c t to the e vid e nc e wh e n it

wa s intr od

uc e d at tr ia l. Ap pli c ant al so a lle g e s that c ouns e l f a ile d to a dv ise him2

t h at t h e S t at e was seekingto enhanc e his punishment, and enter ed a ple a of “ true” to the enhanc ements on Applica nt’s behalf

, knowing that Applicant intended to plea d “not true.” The trial c ourt obtained a n aff idavit from trial counse l, and conduc ted a habeas he aringat which trial c ounsel testified. B ased on the rec ord, af fidavits and testimony , the trial cour t has deter mined th at t rial counse l’s perf ormanc e wa s deficie nt in that counsel failed to pre serve suppression issues by

objectingwhen the e vidence was i n t ro duced at trial, by not informing Applicant of the possible r ang e of punishment in this c ase, and by pleading “true” t o t he enhanc ements on Applica nt’s behalf

when it was A

pplicant’s int ent t o plead “ not true.” The trial court a lso finds that such ineffe ctive re prese ntation prejudice d Applicant. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to relief
. The judgme nt in Cause No. 366-83058-06 from the 366 J udicial th District Court of Colli n County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody

of the Sherif

f of Col lin County to a ns we r t he c ha rg e a g a ins t hi m. Copies of this opinion s hall be sent to the Te x as De partment of Cri mi n a l Ju s ti c e
– Co r r e c ti onal Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: September

29, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
#### STRESSCON INTERNATIONAL et al. v. HOUSTON et al.

No. 39103.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.