alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. OSCAR ARMANDO ROMERO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 10093
D.C. No. 3:19

- cr - 00086

- WHO

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Orrick, III, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 2 , 2020 * *
Before: WALLACE , CLIFTON , and BRESS , Circuit Judges

. Oscar Armando Romero appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 24

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for

p ossession with i ntent to d istribute heroin , in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) , (b)(1)(B) . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 8 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 10093

Romero contends that the district court erred when it imposed a two

- level adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) for being a minor participant , instead of a
four

- level adjustm ent for being a minimal participant under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(a). We review the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, its factual findings for clear error, and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse
of discretion. See United States v. Gasca

- Ruiz , 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc).
The district court applied the correct legal standard in denying the minimal
role reduction. The standard was discussed in the parties’ sentencing memoranda and again at sen tencing, and the district court showed its knowledge of the applicable standards when it determined that a minor role adjustment, rather than a minimal role adjustment, was warranted . Moreover, t he district court did not abuse
its discretion in determinin g that, while Romero played a minor role in the offense , he was not “plainly among the least culpable of those involved in the conduct of [the] group.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.4

. As the district court observed, the large quantity of drugs Romero was task ed with delivering and his language during a call with the confidential informant suggested that he was not a minimal participant. Contrary to Romero’s argument, the district court did not deny the minimal role reduction solely on the basis of drug quanti ty, and its consideration of
that factor was not erroneous. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C) ( list of factors3 20

- 10093

district court must consider to determine mitigating role adjustment is “non

exhaustive” and final determination “is heavily dependent upon the f acts of the particular case”); United States v. Rodriguez

- Castro , 641 F.3d 1189 , 1193 (9th Cir. 2011) ( district court was “justifiably skeptical that this amount of drugs would be entrusted to a minor player”).
AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0205

LSF 8 MASTER PARTICIPATION 

TRUST,

 Plaintiff and Appellees,

 v.

PAMELA J. STOKES AND JOHN 

STOKES,

 Defendants and Appellants.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Douglas J. Wold, P.O. Box 400, Polson, MT 59860, 

doug@woldlawfirm.com, whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring 

appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to 

M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by 

M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this May 25, 2021.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Pamela Jeanne Stokes, John Patrick Stokes, 12887 Raven Way, Big Fork,

MT 59911, (406)837-2283

Jason James Henderson, 38 Second Street East, Suite B, Dickinson, ND 58601,

(701)495-0014, jason@hwmlawfirm.com

Douglas J. Wold, address listed above

05/25/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0205
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64391-64392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meetings:

    Name of SEP: Coronary Stent Angioplasty: Factors Affecting 
Restenosis (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: January 6, 1998.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7214, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892.
    Contact Person: C. James Scheirer, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, 
Room 7220, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-
0266.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    Name of SEP: Specialized Centers of Research in Acute Lung 
Injury.
    Date: January 7-8, 1998.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, Maryland 20815.
    Contact Person: Anne P. Clark, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, Room 
7186, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0280.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    Name of SEP: Specialized Centers of Research in Neurobiology of 
Sleep and Sleep Apnea.

[[Page 64392]]

    Date: January 8, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: Key Bridge Marriott, 1401 Lee Highway, Arlington, 
Virginia 22209.
    Contact Person: S. Charles Selden, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, 
Room 7196, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-
0288.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: November 30, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-31832 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                         178,213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  314,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,937,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,463,530
<PP&E>                                       2,314,314
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,880,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,927,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,548,549
<BONDS>                                      1,050,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     78,097
<COMMON>                                     1,035,186
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,261,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,927,834
<SALES>                                      1,924,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,924,466
<CGS>                                        1,292,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  942,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (446,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (446,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                740,376
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   293,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,465
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,534
<PP&E>                                          10,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,115
<BONDS>                                          1,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,491
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,389
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,940
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,291
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (32)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,413
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,148
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7485

HARVEY P. SHORT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY

OF CHARLOTTE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

B. C. BALAMUCKI, Officer,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-00-409)

Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Harvey P. Short appeals a district court order dismissing

claims against some, but not all, defendants in Short’s 42 U.S.C.A.

§ 1983 (West Supp. 2000) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Oct - Dec

2015 Actual 212 354 (7) 347 135 333 0

Jan - Mar

2016 Actual 266 244 3 247 (20) 314 0

Apr - Jun

2016 Actual (60) (25) 14 (10) 50 364 0

Jul - Sep

2016 Actual 234 222 2 224 (10) 353 0

Oct - Dec

2016 Actual 201 255 (8) 246 46 399 0

Jan - Mar

2017 Actual 335 40 (12) 28 (307) 92 0

Apr - Jun

2017 Actual (75) 35 (22) 14 89 181 0

Jul - Sep

2017 Actual 192 189 (19) 170 (22) 159 0

Oct - Dec

2017 Actual 204 282 (8) 274 70 229 (12)

Jan - Mar

2018 Actual 374 488 (54) 435 61 290 (30)

Apr - Jun

2018 Actual (43) 72 (72) 0 43 333 (48)

Jul - Sep

2018 Actual 212 353 (89) 264 52 385 (66)

Oct - Dec

2018 Actual 291 426 (117) 309 17 402 (91)

Jan - Mar

2019 Actual 375 374 (67) 306 (68) 334 (46)

Apr - Jun

2019 Actual 13 40 (97) (57) (70) 264 (67)

Jul - Sep

2019 Actual 281 440 (40) 400 119 382 (30)

Oct - Dec

2019 Actual 313 330 7 337 24 404 0

Jan - Mar

2020 Actual 365 477 (1) 476 111 515 0

Apr - Jun

2020 Actual 1,526 2,753 (20) 2,733 1207 1722 0

Jul - Sep

2020 Actual 401 454 7 461 60 1782 0

Oct - Dec November 2, 2020 1546 617 (53) 565 (982) 800 0

2020 Actual 648 597 (3) 595 (53) 1729 0

Forecast Revisions (899) (20) 50 30 929 929 0

Jan - Mar November 2, 2020 1123 1127 (4) 1123 0 800 0

2021 February 1, 2021 1187 274 (16) 258 (929) 800 0

Forecast Revisions 64 (853) (12) (865) (929) 0 0

Apr - Jun

2021 February 1, 2021 393 95 (1) 93 (300) 500 0

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
#### Slattery, Appellant, *v.*Aetna Life Insurance Co.

Argued April 25, 1934.

Before Tbex-ler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*608
      *Austin L. Staley,*for appellant.

*P. K. Motheral,*and with him *Reed, Smith, Sham & McClay,*for appellee.

May 4, 1934:

Per Curiam,

This action in assumpsit was tried before a judge in the county court of Allegheny County without a jury. It was based on a policy of life insurance which provided for the payment of the face of the policy, $1,000, to the insured, in the event of his total and permanent disability. It raised issues of fact which had to be decided by the fact finding body, — in this case, the trial judge. His finding on the facts has the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. His finding was that the plaintiff had failed to sustain his contention that he was totally and permanently disabled. Judgment was accordingly entered for the defendant. There is competent evidence in the case to support the finding. This being so we are as much concluded by the judge’s finding as we would be by the verdict of a jury.

The rule to open the judgment and for a new trial was argued before a court consisting of two judges. Their disagreement leaves the judgment in full force and effect; just as when an appellate court is evenly divided the judgment stands: Etting v. U. S. Bank, 11 Wheaton 59, 78; Griel’s Estate, 171 Pa. 412, 416; New Castle v. Berger, 74 Pa. Superior Ct. 548.

Judgment affirmed.
255 La. 916

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Camille GIORDANO.

No. 50527.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1970.

In re: Camille Giordano applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus and stay order.

Writ refused. Relator has adequate remedy at law, if convicted.
254 La. 763

#### In re Investigation of Alleged Violation of the Code of Governmental Ethics by Roland F. COPPLA, Member of the Louisiana State Police.

No. 49950.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: State of Louisiana, Commission on Governmental Ethics, applying for certi-orari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Louisiana Commission on Governmental Ethics. 222 So.2d 314.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2389 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2389

    To prohibit the Chief of the United States Capitol Police from 
retaliating or otherwise imposing disciplinary action against officers 
of the Capitol Police who seek or receive wellness services, including 
               trauma counseling, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

 Mr. Cawthorn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the Chief of the United States Capitol Police from 
retaliating or otherwise imposing disciplinary action against officers 
of the Capitol Police who seek or receive wellness services, including 
               trauma counseling, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Capitol Police 
Wellness Promotion Act''.

SEC. 2. WELLNESS SERVICES FOR UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE OFFICERS.

    (a) Prohibiting Retaliation Against Officers Who Seek or Receive 
Wellness Services.--The Chief of the United States Capitol Police may 
not retaliate or impose any disciplinary action against an officer of 
the Capitol Police on the grounds that the officer sought or received 
trauma counseling or other wellness services.
    (b) Use of Vendors To Provide Services.--The Chief of the United 
States Capitol Police shall investigate the feasibility and 
desirability of using vendors to provide trauma counseling and other 
mental health counseling and evaluation services to officers of the 
Capitol Police.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the United States Capitol Police such sums as may be 
necessary for the provision of trauma counseling and other mental 
health counseling and evaluation services to officers of the Capitol 
Police.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2370 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on the estate tax valuation of certain real property used in farming 

or other trades or businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2021 

Mr. PANETTA (for himself and Mrs. WALORSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on the estate tax valuation of certain real 

property used in farming or other trades or businesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Family 

5 Farms Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2370 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON THE ESTATE TAX 

2 VALUATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY 

3 USED IN FARMING OR OTHER TRADES OR 

4 BUSINESSES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2032A(a)(2) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘$750,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$11,700,000’’. 

8 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 2032A(a)(3) 

9 of such Code is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘$750,000’’ both places it ap11 pears and inserting ‘‘$11,700,000’’, 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘1998’’ in the matter preceding 

13 subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘‘2021’’, and 

14 (3) by striking ‘‘1997’’ in subparagraph (B) 

15 and inserting ‘‘2020’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to the estates of decedents dying 

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION fuHcHT Or 

WASHINGTON, D.C. ^ •^MR-OnTAijO;; 

Ninety Day Notice of 

Colgan Airlines, Inc. 

of termination of Essential Air Service 

at Victoria, Texas 

Pursuant to 14 C. F. R. Part 323 

i 7 >! • L) _ Q A '''^' 

Doclcet DOT-OST-2005-20454 

NINETY-DAY NOTICE OF 

TERMINATION OF SERVICE 

Communications with respect to this document should be address to: 

D. Philip Reed, Jr. 

Vice President 

Network Scheduling, Operational Analytics and Performance Engineering 

PINNACLE AIRLINES CORP. 

One Commerce Square, 9"" Floor 

40 S. Main Street 

Memphis, TN 38103 

(901) 348-4257 

preed@pnci.com 

Dated: March 08,2012 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Ninety Day Notice of 

Colgan Airlines, Inc. 

of termination of Essential Air Service 

at Victoria, Texas 

Pursuant to 14 C. F. R. Part 323 

Docket DOT-OST-2005-20454 

NINETY-DAY NOTICE 

OF TERMINATION OF SERVICE 

Pursuant to Part 323 of the Department of Transportation's Regulations (14 C.F.R. Part 323), 

Colgan Airlines, Inc. hereby gives notice of its intent to discontinue the service it provides at Staunton, 

VA (SHD), effective June 08, 2012. 

Colgan Airlines, Inc. can no longer continue service to the community. The discontinuation of 

service will cause service to drop below the EAS guarantee levels established by the Department. Colgan 

Airlines, Inc. operates as United Airlines Express, 13 weekly non-stop roundtrips between Victoria, TX 

(VCT) and George Bush Intercontinental (lAH) with 34 seat Saab Turbo-Prop aircraft. Current schedules 

including routes, arrival and departure times, equipment types, and operating carrier(s) are as follows: 

Colgan Airlines, Inc. Operated Service 

vcr 

Marketing 

Airline 

UA 

UA 

UA 

UA 

UA 

Operating 

Airline 

9L 

9L 

9L 

9L 

9L 

Victoria 

TX 

Org 

lAH 

vcr 

lAH 

vcr 

vcr 

Dst 

VCT 

lAH 

VCT 

lAH 

lAH 

Eqpt 

SF3 

SF3 

SF3 

SF3 

SF3 

Seats 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

Respectfully Submitted, 

D. Philip Reed, 

^ ^ < ^ ^ 

Jr. 

-7, 

Dep 

Time 

1530 

1640 

2130 

0525 

0648 

f 

AnTime 

1625 

MAI 

2230 

0630 

0800 

Op 

Days 

12345.7 

12345.7 

1234567 

12345.. 

67 

D. Philip^^ . Jr. 

Vice-Pre^ 

Network Scheduling, Operational Armlytics & PerfoiTnance Engineering 

PINNACLE AIRLINES. CORR 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

A copy of the foregoing Ninety-Day Notice of Termination of Service has been served this 8* day of 

March 2012, upon the following persons via Federal Express: 

U.S. Postal Service 

ATTN: Assistant General Counsel, Transportation 

475 L'Enfant Plaza S.W, 

Washington, D.C. 20260 

The Honorable Will Armstrong Jason Milewski 

Mayor Airport Manager 

City Hall Victoria Regional Airport Authority 

105 W. Juan Linn Street 609 Foster Field Drive, Suite F 

Victoria, TX 77901 Victoria, TX 77904