alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a consent decree that would resolve the liability of 
one of four defendants in United States of America v. Jane A. Young, et 
al., Civil Action No. 95-4202-JPG (S.D. Ill.), was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois on 
October 28, 1997.
    The proposed consent decree concerns alleged violations of the 
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311, as a result of the discharge of 
dredged and fill materials onto approximately 100 acres of wetlands, in 
Hamilton County, Illinois (``Site''), which is alleged to constitute 
``waters of the United States.'' The consent decree permanently enjoins 
Jane A. Young from taking any actions, or causing others to take any 
actions, which result in the discharge of dredged or fill material into 
waters of the United States. The consent decree further requires Jane 
A. Young to pay (a) A $5,000.00 civil penalty and (b) $28,000 into an 
interest-bearing Registry Account of the United States District Court 
for the Southern District of Illinois, to be used to conduct a wetland 
restoration at the Site if the United States obtains access to the Site 
through litigation or other means. In addition, the consent decree 
provides that if the United States is not able to obtain access to the 
Site to conduct a wetland restoration, all funds in the Registry 
Account (except for 10% of the interest that is to be paid to the 
Court) will be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the United 
States Treasury.
    The Department of Justice will receive written comments relating to 
the consent decree for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of 
this notice. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States 
Department of Justice, Attention: Steven E. Rusak, Trial Attorney, 
Environmental Defense Section, P.O. Box 23986, Washington, DC 20026-
3986, and should refer to United States of America v. Jane A. Young, et 
al., DJ Reference No. 90-5-1-6-580.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 301 West Main 
Street, Benton, Illinois 62812.
Letitia J. Grishaw,
Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 97-31282 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, James A. Israel, President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

 

A review of the activities of Deere Credit Services, Inc. for the period from April 22, 2010 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2010 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 31, 2010 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 22, 2010 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2010 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 
| Date:   January 12, 2011 | Deere   Credit Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          | By                                 | */s/   James A. Israel* |   |
|                          |                               | James   A. Israel |
|                          |                               | President |

 

16

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Hidden Ladder, Inc. a Florida corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hidden Ladder, Inc., and will be retained by Hidden Ladder, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  /s/ David Johnson David Johnson Chief Executive Officer April 12, 2011
S:\CHARTS\2Q-REPORT.11.doc July 11, 2011 (9:56 AM)

Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending

April 1 – June 30, 2011

Date Country Amount Type

U.S. 

Position Background

05/06/2011 Colombia SDR 3.87 billion

($6.22 billion)

FCL Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2011/pr11165.htm

05/20/2011 Portugal SDR 23.742 billion

(€26 billion)

EFF Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2011/pr11190.htm

06/13/2011 Mali SDR 25 million

($40 million)

ECF 

Augmentation

Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2011/pr11231.htm

06/20/2011 Kyrgyz Republic SDR 66.6 million

($106 million)

ECF Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2011/pr11245.htm

06/27/2011 Liberia SDR 8.88 million

($13 million)

ECF 

Augmentation

Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2011/pr11258.htm
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF
REGIONAL COUNSEL

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT : Meeting with EarthJustice re: Washington Proposed SIP Correction

FROM : Julie Vergeront Assistant Regional Counsel

DATE : March 25, 2011

TO : Docket No. EPA-R10-OAR-2011, FRL-9285-6

The purpose of this memo is to summa rize a conference call between EPA and representatives of EarthJustice on March 25, 2011 regarding a proposed correction to the Washington State Implementation Plan (SIP) pub lished in the Federal Register on March 23, 2011. See 76 Fed. Reg. 16365.

EarthJustice requested this meeting with Ja net McCabe, Principal Deputy Administrator

for the Office of Air and Radiation. Patti Goldman and Janette Brimmer participated on behalf

of EarthJustice. Janet McCabe , Sara Froikin, Rich Ossias, J im Havard, Scott Mathias, Debra Suzuki, Kristin Hall, Janis Hastings, and Julie Vergeront participated on behalf of EPA.

EPA advised that because EPA is in the midst of a public comment period on the proposed SIP correction, EPA would be putting a su mmary of the meeting in the administrative record for the proposed action. EPA then aske d that EarthJustice s ubmit during the public comment period written comment s addressing the issues Eart hJustice would like EPA to consider in the proposed SIP correction. The Ea rthJustice representative s said they planned on doing so.

EarthJustice stated that it did not believe EP A’s action in the proposed correction to limit these provisions of the Washington SIP to pollutants with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and NAAQS precursors—thus excluding greenhouse gase s-- is consistent with the long term policy goals of EPA and th is administration to reduce greenhouse gases.

EarthJustice believes that SIPs should be availabl e as a tool for states to address greenhouse

gases.

EPA stated that we would consider all comments submitted during the public comment period.
Exhibit 31

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Scott Hosking, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Lumalite
         Holdings, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
         untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material  fact
         necessary to make the  statements  made, in light of the  circumstances
         under which such  statements  were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by this quarterly report.

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all
         material  respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and
         cash flows of the  registrant as of, and for, the periods  presented in
         this quarterly report;

         4.  I  am  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
         controls  and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
         15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
         material  information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
         consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared.

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
         and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  Presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
         effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have  disclosed,  based  on our  most  recent  evaluation,  to the
         registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
         directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls  which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
         record,   process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
         identified  for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
         other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's
         internal controls; and

Date: July 28, 2003               /s/ Scott Hosking
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Scott Hosking
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  And Principal Accounting Officer

                                        8
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2020*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter 191.41

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE^

3-Year Note 7/15 49.00 3.00

10-Year Note (r) 7/15 27.00 2.00

30-Year Bond (r) 7/15 18.00 1.00 54.66 39.34

2-Year FRN 7/31 25.00 3.00

10-Year TIPS 7/31 16.00 2.00

2-Year Note 7/31 51.00 3.00

5-Year Note 7/31 52.00 3.00

7-Year Note 7/31 41.00 2.00

20-Year Bond (r) 7/31 12.00 12.00 133.73 63.27

3-Year Note 8/17 52.00 3.00

10-Year Note 8/17 32.00 2.00

30-Year Bond 8/17 23.00 2.00 50.20 56.80

2-Year FRN (r) 8/28 23.00 2.00 0.00 23.00

30-Year TIPS (r) 8/31 8.00 1.00

2-Year Note 8/31 54.00 3.00

5-Year Note 8/31 55.00 3.00

7-Year Note 8/31 43.00 2.00

20-Year Bond 8/31 15.00 1.00 88.68 86.32

3-Year Note 9/15 55.00 3.00

10-Year Note (r) 9/15 29.00 2.00

30-Year Bond (r) 9/15 20.00 2.00 20.13 83.87

2-Year FRN (r) 9/25 23.00 2.00 0.00 23.00

10-Year TIPS (r) 9/30 14.00 2.00

2-Year Note 9/30 57.00 3.00

5-Year Note 9/30 58.00 3.00

7-Year Note 9/30 45.00 2.00

20-Year Bond (r) 9/30 13.00 1.00 77.01 109.99

910.00 424.41 485.59

Estimates are italicized. r = reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 677

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 05/04/2020 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
#### Cecil E. PLATT and Edith H. Platt, his wife, Appellants, v. D. W. GROVER, Appellee.

No. 76-1129.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 18, 1977.

Edward L. Trader, Melbourne, for appellants.

Eric R. Jones, Hedman, Cossaboom & Jones, Melbourne, for appellee.

*1050PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C. J., and DOWNEY, J., concur.

CROSS, J., dissents with opinion.

CROSS, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

I would dismiss the appeal as a non-ap-pealable order under Florida Appellate Rule 4.2.
#### Dennis Robert HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1417.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 8, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lynn Richard Mattaway, Legal Intern, for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HAVER-FIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Robert Hughes was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, and this appeal by the defendant ensued.

Appellant argued the judgment should be reversed because he was brought before the trial jury in what he contends was prison garb. We find no merit therein. The record shows the clothes he wore at the trial were not prison garb, but were his own clothing consisting of a work shirt and blue jean trousers. It appeared that the clothing he was wearing when taken into custody had been lost or misplaced by the police prior to the time of trial. However, on the second day of the trial the defendant was offered more conventional clothing but rejected it. The appellant con*22tends he rejected the offered clothes because they did not fit. The record shows a refutation of that contention by the state with reference to the clothing- offered to the defendant.

 No error was committed by denial of defendant’s motion to suppress his oral confession. The record shows the defendant was warned of his constitutional rights, and that the confession was voluntarily made. As to whether the defendant’s capacity to understand was impaired by either lack of sleep or intoxication when he was warned of his constitutional rights, and while he was being interrogated by the police, the record shows conflicting evidence. Based thereon the trial court, as was its province, was entitled to hold the defendant was not so impaired. There was no unnecessary delay in presenting the defendant before a committing magistrate. The arrest of the defendant occurred in the early hours of a certain day and his confession was made before noon on that day. See Young v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1964, 326 F.2d 255; Outten v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 197 So.2d 594 (quashed on other grounds, Fla., 206 So.2d 392); Stevens v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 565. We have examined a remaining point presented by the appellant and do not find therein ground for reversal of the judgment.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3251]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

46 CFR Parts 502 and 510

[Docket No. 97-03]


Implementation of 21 U.S.C. 862; Denial of Federal Benefits to 
Drug Traffickers and Possessors

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amends Commission regulations to reflect the 
redesignation of 21 U.S.C. 853a as 21 U.S.C. 862, which was effected by 
Public Law 101-647. No substantive change is involved.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph C. Polking, Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North 
Capitol Street, NW, Room 1046, Washington, D.C. 20573-0001, (202) 523-
5725.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Commission regulations at 46 CFR 502.27 and 
510.12 contain requirements for applicants for admission to practice 
before the Commission and for a freight forwarders license to submit a 
certification regarding non-conviction for drug offenses and 
eligibility for federal benefits. The prescribed certification includes 
a reference to ``21 U.S.C. 853a.'' Subsequent to adoption of these 
rules 21 U.S.C. 853a was redesignated as 21 U.S.C. 862 by Public Law 
101-647, 104 Stat. 4827. This document merely changes the references in 
Commission rules to reflect this redesignation and involves no 
substantive change.

List of Subjects

46 CFR Part 502

    Administrative practice and procedure.

46 CFR Part 510

    Freight forwarders.

    For the reason set forth above, parts 502 and 510 of 46 CFR are 
amended as follows:

PART 502--RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

    1. The authority citation for part 502 is revised to read as 
follows.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504, 551, 552, 553, 556(c), 559, 561-569, 
571-596; 12 U.S.C. 1114j(a); 18 U.S.C. 207; 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3); 28 
U.S.C. 2112(a); 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C. app. 817, 820, 821, 826, 
841a, 1114(b), 1705, 1707-1711, 1713-1716; E.O. 11222 of May 8, 1965 
(30 FR 6469); 21 U.S.C. 862; and Pub. L 88-777 (46 U.S.C. app 817d, 
817e).


Sec. 502.27  [Amended]

    2. In Sec. 502.27(a)(2) the reference to ``21 U.S.C. 853a'' is 
amended to read ``21 U.S.C. 862''.

PART 510--LICENSING OF OCEAN FREIGHT FORWARDERS

    1. The authority citation for part 510 is revised to read as 
follows.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 553; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C. app. 1702, 
1707, 1709, 1710, 1712, 1714, 1716, and 1718; 21 U.S.C. 862.


Sec. 510.12  [Amended]

    2. In Sec. 510.12(a)(2) is the reference to ``21 U.S.C. 853a'' is 
amended to read ``21 U.S.C. 862''.

    By the Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3251 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000880416
<NAME>NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  561,717
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 45,146
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                     125,609
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   110,586
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             843,058
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  160,999
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            505
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             161,505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       135,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              270,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             276,553
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              843,058
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   66,276
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         3,026
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  45,821
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  54,619
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     11,657
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (637)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              16,792
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     9,039
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,753
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                7,753
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    20,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      53,929
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00

</TABLE>
Document

			
	Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO
CASH-SETTLED STOCK BASED AWARD AGREEMENT
UNDER THE 
ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC. AMENDED 2013 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN




WHEREAS, OneMain Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) previously made a grant of cash settled stock based awards to the undersigned (the “Participant”) pursuant to the terms and conditions of the OneMain Holdings, Inc. Amended 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and a Cash-Settled Stock-Based Award Agreement under the Plan, dated as of ______, by and between the Company and the Participant (the “Award Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend the Award Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Amendment Number 1 (this “Amendment”).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Award Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of July 16, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”):


1.Section 5 of the Award Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Settlement. The Award, to the extent it becomes vested pursuant to Section 2, shall be settled on the day following the applicable vesting date described in Exhibit A and the Company shall deliver to the Participant (or the Participant's personal representative) as soon as practical thereafter, but in no event later than 30 days following such applicable date, cash in an amount equal to (i) the product of (A) the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the Award became vested on the applicable vesting date described in Exhibit A, and (B) the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock (determined as of the date following the applicable vesting date described in Exhibit A) less the Base Calculation Price, less (ii) any withholding pursuant to Section 10.
2.Exhibit A to the Award Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. 
3.Except as set forth in this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Award Agreement as in effect immediately prior to the date hereof shall remain in full force and effect.
4.This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws, and not the laws pertaining to conflicts or choices of laws, of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within the State of Delaware.








5.This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. Your electronic signature of this Amendment shall have the same validity and effect as a signature affixed by your hand.




[Signature Page Follows]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.




ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC.






By:                         


Print Name: Heather A. McHale


Title: Chief Human Resources Officer




PARTICIPANT








Signature:                     


[NAME]










Exhibit A


[Intentionally left blank]