alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2137 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to further protect officers and 

employees of the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mr. CUELLAR (for himself, Mr. MCCAUL, and Mr. CHABOT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to further protect 

officers and employees of the United States, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jaime Zapata and Vic5 tor Avila Federal Law Enforcement Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 It is the sense of Congress that— 

8 (1) since the founding of the Nation, officers 

9 and employees of the United States Government 

10 have dutifully and faithfully served the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2137 IH

1 States overseas, including in situations that place 

2 them at serious risk of death or bodily harm, in 

3 order to preserve, protect, and defend the interests 

4 of the United States; 

5 (2) securing the safety of such officers and em6 ployees while serving overseas is of paramount im7 portance and is also in furtherance of preserving, 

8 protecting, and defending the interests of the United 

9 States; 

10 (3) Federal courts, including the United States 

11 Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the United 

12 States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and 

13 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh 

14 Circuit, have correctly interpreted section 1114 of 

15 title 18, United States Code, to apply 

16 extraterritorially to protect officers and employees of 

17 the United States while the officers and employees 

18 are serving abroad; 

19 (4) in a case involving a violent attack against 

20 Federal law enforcement officers Jaime Zapata and 

21 Victor Avila, a panel of a Federal court of appeals 

22 held that section 1114 of title 18, United States 

23 Code, does not apply extraterritorially, creating a 

24 split among the United States circuit courts of ap25 peals; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2137 IH

1 (5) in light of the opinion described in para2 graph (4), it has become necessary for Congress to 

3 clarify the original intent that section 1114 of title 

4 18, United States Code, applies extraterritorially. 

5 SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF 

6 THE UNITED STATES. 

7 Section 1114 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

10 ‘‘Whoever’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.—There is 

13 extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by 

14 this section.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Indiana

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Indiana

$2.8 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Afena Federal Credit Union Marion CDFI $ 2,800,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
EXHIBIT 11

                              Congoleum Corporation
                     Computation of Income Per Common Share
                (Amounts in thousands, except earnings per share)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
                                                      June 30,             June 30,
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:                  2000       1999      2000      1999
--------------------------------                -------    -------   -------    -------

<S>                                             <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
(Loss) income per common and common
     equivalent share                           $(2,203)   $ 1,190   $(4,137)   $ 1,927
                                                =======    =======   =======    =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding        8,260      8,761     8,273      8,870
                                                =======    =======   =======    =======

(Loss) income per common share                  $  (.27)   $   .14   $  (.50)   $   .22
                                                =======    =======   =======    =======


Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:

(Loss) income per common and common
     equivalent share                           $(2,203)   $ 1,190   $(4,137)   $ 1,927
                                                =======    =======   =======    =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding        8,260      8,761     8,273      8,870
                                                =======    =======   =======    =======

Weighted average common and common
     equivalent shares                            8,260      8,761     8,273      8,870
                                                =======    =======   =======    =======

(Loss) income per common and common
     equivalent share                           $  (.27)   $   .14   $  (.50)   $   .22
                                                =======    =======   =======    =======
</TABLE>


                                       15
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 226 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2021 

Mr. GRIFFITH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a 

single, unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZIP CODE FOR FAIRLAWN, VIRGINIA. 

4 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con5 gress that— 

6 (1) the Commonwealth of Virginia is the only 

7 State in the United States where all cities are inde8 pendent from their surrounding counties; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 226 IH

1 (2) these independent cities are not politically a 

2 part of the surrounding counties, even if they are lo3 cated within their borders; 

4 (3) in Virginia these independent cities are sub5 ject to separate revenue collection and distribution 

6 practices related to roads, resources, and sales tax 

7 than neighboring counties; 

8 (4) the sales tax collected from electronic com9 merce from the unincorporated community of 

10 Fairlawn, Virginia, located in Pulaski County, is 

11 often misallocated to the independent city of 

12 Radford, Virginia, because they share the same ZIP 

13 Codes; and 

14 (5) Fairlawn, Virginia, should be eligible to ob15 tain a separate and unique ZIP Code from the 

16 neighboring independent city of Radford, Virginia, 

17 for tax purposes. 

18 (b) ZIP CODE DESIGNATION.—Not later than 180 

19 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

20 United States Postal Service shall designate a single, 

21 unique ZIP Code applicable to Fairlawn, Virginia. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Thomas Ellis CARTER v. Minnie Lee Stanford CARTER.

No. 45508.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1969.

H. K. Van Every, Columbus, for appellant.

Johnny N. Tackett, Aberdeen, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
1

Hall-Jordan, Luke

From: Jones, Danielle <Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 12:14 PM

To: Donaldson, David

Cc: Hall-Jordan, Luke; Arling, Jeremy

Subject: EO 12866 Interagency Review: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Update to the 

Refrigerant Management Requirements Under Section 608 of the Clean Air Act

Hello David, 

OMB has concluded review on the NPRM entitled Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Update to the Refrigerant 

Management Requirements Under Section 608 of the Clean Air Act. 

It was a pleasure working with you and your staff on this review. 

Best, 

Danielle 

Danielle Y. Jones 

Policy Analyst 

Office of Management and Budget 

Phone: (202) 395-1741 | djones@omb.eop.gov
-1- 

### STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 12, 2017

v No. 324384 Wayne Circuit Court CHARLES DAMON JONES, LC No. 12-000948-FC

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: R ONAYNE K RAUSE , P.J., and S AWYER and S TEPHENS , JJ.

R ONAYNE K RAUSE

, J., ( concurring ).

I concur in result only.

/s/ Amy Ronayne Krause
#### METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellants, v. Arthur H. COURSHON et al., Appellees.

No. 69-903.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 19, 1970.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and Murray A. Greenberg, Asst. County Atty., for appellants.

Ely R. Katz and Michael H. Salmon, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Metropolitan Dade County appeals from a final judgment rendered for plaintiffs (appellees) in a consolidated suit in which they had challenged the 1967 and 1968 tax assessments on their real property.

The first point raised by Dade County basically challenges the sufficiency of the evidence considered by the trial judge in arriving at his decision and final judgment. It is argued that he did not consider all the improvements on the realty. A review of the record reveals that it contained sufficient, competent and substantial evidence as to all the improvements on the real property which the trial court judge properly considered in arriving at his final judgment.

Under Point Two it is argued that the 1967 and 1968 real property tax assessments should have been upheld under the rule of Harbond, Inc. v. Anderson, Fla.App. 1961, 134 So.2d 816. We think the trial court properly followed the rule pronounced in Keith Investments, Inc. v. James, Fla, App.1969, 220 So.2d 695.

In its third point Dade County argues that the trial judge should not have considered any of the testimony of an expert witness for the appellees. The record shows that the expert witness was properly qualified and the trial judge properly judged his credibility and the weight to be given to any, or all, of his testimony.

In its last point the county argues that the trial court erred in the final judgment by awarding costs to the plaintiff “which were to be fixed by future order of this *536court.” Appellees concede to this point on appeal and agree that no order fixing costs was ever made and that they would not apply for any such order. Under these circumstances we will not discuss the propriety of that portion of the final judgment. Cf. Simpson v. Merrill, Fla.1970, 234 So.2d 350, filed April 15, 1970.

There apparently were some errors or misconceptions made in the final judgment but we do not find those raised by appellant sufficient to warrant reversal.

Affirmed.
Document

Exhibit 10.1

CALIX, INC.


Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation Policy, as amended August 11, 2021




1.General. This Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation Policy (“Policy”) was adopted by the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Calix, Inc. (“Company”) on August 11, 2021 and is effective as of July 26, 20211.


2.Annual Cash Compensation. Each member of the board who is not employed by the Company or one of its affiliates shall be entitled to an annual retainer with the amount determined as follows (the net sum for each director, his or her “Annual Retainer”):


						
	 	Amount
	Base Retainer	$50,000
	Board and Committee Chair Service (in addition to Base Retainer)
	 
	Board Chair	$50,000
	Lead Independent Director	$25,000
	Audit Committee Chair	$35,000
	Compensation Committee Chair	$20,000
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair	$10,000
	Cybersecurity Committee Chair	$10,000
	Strategic Committee Chair	$10,000
	Non-Chair Committee Service (in addition to Base Retainer)
	 
	Audit Committee	$10,000
	Compensation Committee	$7,500
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	$5,000
	Cybersecurity Committee	$5,000
	Strategic Committee	$5,000




3.Timing of Payment. Annual Retainers shall be paid in quarterly installments in arrears, generally during the first week of the Company’s fiscal quarter following the quarter of service. Installments will be pro-rated for any partial period of service.


4.Policy Subject to Amendment, Modification and Termination. This Policy may be amended, modified or terminated by the Board at any time in the future at its sole discretion.




* * * *

1 The Company’s Lead Independent Director was appointed on July 26, 2021.
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-2403 LT Case No. 2019-C F -0008 8 6-A



### _____________________________

C HRISTOPHER R AWLS , Appellant 

### ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee



### .

_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County. Hale R. Stancil , Judge.
Mat thew J. Metz, Pu blic Defende r, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Da ytona Beach , for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney Gen eral, and Whit ney Brown Har tless, Assistant At torney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

August 22, 2023
P ER C URIAM

. A FFIR MED

. E ISNAUGLE , K ILBANE , and M ACIVER , JJ ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
### Martin, Michael (OST) Subject: FW: Request - EAS



### From: 

### Michael Morgan Sent: 

### Thursday, January 29, 2015 10:23 PM To: 

### Kevin.Schlemmer@dot.gov 

### Cc: Stanley Clouse; BRUCE LEAR (BRUCE@BiackOakinvestment.com) Subject: 

### Request- EAS '-:_'

The City of Kearney respectfully requests an extension thru the end of February 

### 15, 2015 regarding our recommendation related to essential air service. This will enable us to evaluate DOT's response and expectations regarding ADI's appeal. Further, this period will also allow us time to consider requesting a one year extension ofGreat Lakes Service at thattime. Thank yourforyour assistance. Michael W. Morgan City Manager City of Kearney 

### 18 E

### 22nd Street 

### PO Box 

### 1180 Kearney, NE 

### 68848 308-233-3214 mmorgan@kearneygov.org We provide services, solutions, andopportunities forourcommunity.

### ~ Please considerthe environment before printing this email.

1
254 La. 772

#### John MATTHEWS v. MILWHITE MUD SALES COMPANY et al.

No. 49980.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Milwhite Mud Sales Company and Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Iberia. 225 So.2d 391.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: February 23, 2012 | By: /s/ Richard HerreraName: Richard HerreraTitle: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30701]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 931]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status, Nissan Industrial Engine 
Manufacturing USA, Inc.; (Spark Ignition Industrial Engines), Marengo, 
Illinois

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;
    Whereas, an application from the Greater Rockford Airport 
Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 176, for authority to 
establish special-purpose subzone status at the spark ignition 
industrial engine manufacturing plant of Nissan Industrial Engine 
Manufacturing USA, Inc., in Marengo, Illinois, was filed by the Board 
on October 16, 1996, and notice inviting public comment was given in 
the Federal Register (FTZ Docket 76-96, 61 FR 55268, 10-25-96); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application 
is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby authorizes the establishment of a 
subzone (Subzone 176D) at the Nissan Industrial Engine Manufacturing 
USA, Inc., plant in Marengo, Illinois, at the location described in the 
application, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of November 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30701 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          78,444                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,066                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,904)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,556,349                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               (766,691)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,093,513                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     (270,340)                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (6,093,513)                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (401,098)               (784,208)
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,664                 309,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               104,274                 194,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,170                  96,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                100,906                  54,053
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,742                  30,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,164                  23,342
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
# Monthly_MDB_Voting_Records_2013

MonthlyMarch 2013	

# image1.emf
# September