alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2353 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2353

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, as the ``Helen Fabela Chavez 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2021

  Mr. Vargas (for himself, Ms. Bass, Mr. Aguilar, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. 
    Garamendi, Mr. Correa, Ms. Barragan, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. 
   Sherman, Mr. Schiff, Ms. Speier, Mr. DeSaulnier, Ms. Matsui, Mr. 
Swalwell, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Costa, Ms. Chu, Ms. Brownley, Mr. Thompson 
  of California, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Ruiz, Mr. Grijalva, and Mr. Peters) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, as the ``Helen Fabela Chavez 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HELEN FABELA CHAVEZ MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located 401 Main Street in Brawley, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Helen Fabela Chavez Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Helen 
Fabela Chavez Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered December 31 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00466

- CR

JUAN MANUEL AREVALOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 19 4t h Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 19

- 00219

- M

O RDER

Before the Court is a ppellant ’ s December 30, 2020 second motion for an

extension of time to file his brief . We GRANT the motion and ORDER

appellant ’ s brief due on Ja nuary 29, 20 21

.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
#### James Walter STARRETT, a/k/a “Blu”, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 8, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart La Motte, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     UT


<LEGEND>                      The schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from Consolidated
                              Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Statement of
                              Cash Flows for Consolidated
                              Edison Company of New York, Inc. and is
                              qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>  
<CIK> 0000023632
<NAME> Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                               <C> 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                      Mar-31-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                      Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>         11,401,237

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>       289,109

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>            1,101,390

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>          524,142

<OTHER-ASSETS>                    947,044

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    14,262,922

<COMMON>                          588,720

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>         857,333

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>               4,575,774

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>    5,690,972

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             37,050

<PREFERRED>                       212,563

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>              3,925,548

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                   0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>            0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>    121,906

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>     350,000

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>            0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>       36,580

<LEASES-CURRENT>                  2,600

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>    3,885,703

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>     14,262,922

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>         1,732,269

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>              104,766

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        1,362,206

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        1,466,972

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>           265,297

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                341

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>    265,638

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>          80,223

<NET-INCOME>                      185,415

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>       3,398

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>     182,017

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>          123,772

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>         75,843

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>            323,751

<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0

<EPS-DILUTED>                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.4b


 


______________ __, 2021


 


State Street Bank and Trust Company 


100 Summer Street, Floor 5 


Boston, MA 02110 


Attention:      Fred
Willshire 


State Street Alternative Investment Solutions


 


Re:     Master
Custodian Agreement – New Fund


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to that certain Master Custodian
Agreement by and between State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Custodian”) and, initially, Morgan Stanley Direct
Lending Fund, dated as of November 26, 2019, as may be amended, restated, modified or supplemented from time to time, (the “Custody
Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings given to them in the Custody Agreement.


 


Pursuant to the Section 20.4 of the Custody
Agreement, undersigned, T SERIES MIDDLE MARKET LOAN FUND LLC (the “New Fund”) hereby requests (1) that the Custodian
act as custodian for the New Fund pursuant to the Custody Agreement and (2) to become an additional “Fund” thereunder.
In connection with such request, the undersigned New Fund: (a) confirms, as of the date hereof, its representations and warranties
set forth in Section 20.5 of the Agreement, and (b) represents and warrants that it is a management investment company that
has elected or will elect to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.


 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]


 






    1 


     


    

 


Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by executing this
Letter and returning a copy to the New Fund.


 


	 	 	T SERIES MIDDLE MARKETLOAN FUND LLC
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	By: 	 
	 	 	Name: 	 
	 	 	Title: 	 
	 	 	 



 


	Agreed to as of ___________, 2021	 	 
	 	 	 
	State Street Bank and Trust Company	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	 	 	 
	Name: 	 	 	 
	Title: 	 	 	 



 






    2
#### In the Interest of F. G., a child.

No. 76-2507.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 23, 1977.

*728Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard P. Zaretsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant State of Fla.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and Lydia S. Castle, Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellee F. G.

PER CURIAM.

The only issue presented here is whether Section 944.40 of the Florida Statutes includes escapes from a juvenile detention center. Section 944.40 provides:

> Any prisoner confined in any prison, jail, road camp, or other penal institution, state, county or municipal, working upon the public roads, or being transported to or from a place of confinement who escapes or attempts to escape from such confinement shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in § 775.082, § 775.083, or § 775.084. The punishment of imprisonment imposed under this section shall run consecutive to any former sentence imposed upon any prisoner.

In addition Section 416.06 of the Florida Statutes provides that “a detention home shall not be deemed to be, nor treated as a penal institution, but a home.” Based on the clear and unambiguous language of the statutes involved, the trial court dismissed a petition which attempted to allege a crime for escape from a juvenile home under Section 944.40. That order of dismissal is hereby affirmed.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned hereby certifies that,  tohis knowledge:

 

(1)          This Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q, for the period endedJune 28, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Continental MaterialsCorporation.

 
| July 30, 2003 |
|---------------|
|          |
| By:           | /s/ James G. Gidwitz |   | By: | /s/ Joseph J. Sum |   |
|          | James G. Gidwitz |   | Joseph J. Sum |
|          | Chairman of the Board and |   | Vice President and |
|          | Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Continental Materials Corporation and will be retained byContinental Materials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
U.S. TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1ST QUARTER 2004

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/25 12/29 1/1 10.00 15.00 16.00 53.00 -12.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 1/1 1/5 1/8 10.00 15.00 15.00 46.00 -6.00

1/8 1/12 1/15 10.00 15.00 15.00 45.00 -5.00

1/15 1/19 1/22 12.00 16.00 15.00 44.00 -1.00

1/22 1/26 1/29 16.00 17.00 16.00 44.00 5.00

1/29 2/2 2/5 22.00 18.00 17.00 44.00 13.00

2/5 2/9 2/12 22.00 18.00 17.00 43.00 14.00

2/12 2/16 2/19 22.00 18.00 17.00 44.00 13.00

2/19 2/23 2/26 22.00 18.00 17.00 48.00 9.00

2/26 3/1 3/4 24.00 18.00 17.00 53.00 6.00

3/4 3/8 3/11 21.00 17.00 17.00 52.00 3.00

3/11 3/15 3/18 21.00 17.00 17.00 51.00 4.00

3/18 3/22 3/25 24.00 17.00 17.00 52.00 6.00

668.00 619.00 49.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

5-Year Note 1/5 1/7 1/15 17.00

10-Year TIPS 1/5 1/8 1/15 12.00 +1.00 0.00 29.00

2-Year Note 1/26 1/28 2/2 27.00 +1.00 24.56 2.44

3-Year Note 2/4 2/10 2/17 26.00 +1.00

5-Year Note 2/4 2/11 2/17 19.00 +2.00

10-Year Note 2/4 2/12 2/17 20.00 +1.00 27.04 37.96

2-Year Note 2/23 2/25 3/1 28.00 +1.00 23.75 4.25

5-Year Note 3/8 3/10 3/15 19.00

10-Year Note (R) 3/8 3/11 3/15 15.00 +1.00 0.00 34.00

2-Year Note 3/22 3/24 3/31 28.00 24.54 3.46

211.00 99.89 111.12

R = Reopening NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 160.11

A = Announced

Treasury announced a Q1 

borrowing need of $160 

billion on 11/3/03
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7124

MARVIN H. MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES H. WHITWORTH, Warden; DAVID CHANDLER,

Captain, in their official capacities and as

individuals,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-1555-2-17AJ)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin H. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Whitworth, No. CA-96-1555-2-17AJ (D.S.C. June 27, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Ever Thrive Energy Technology Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periods ending February 28, 2011 and 2010 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Ever Thrive Energy Technology Co., Inc.Date: May 31, 2011
/s/ Lin-Chi ChuLin-Chi ChuChief Executive OfficerDate: May 31, 2011
/s/ Robert YoungRobert YoungChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-5-16-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

December 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1997, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised Sheet No. 9 and 
First Revised Sheet No. 43 to its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised 
Volume No. 1, with a proposed effective date of January 1, 1998.
    National states that pursuant to Article III, Section 1, of the 
approved settlement at Docket Nos. RP94-367-000, et al., National is 
required to recalculate the maximum Firm Gathering (FG) rate annually 
to reflect: (a) the changes in the FG reservation determinants based on 
the FG throughput for the prior 12 months ended October 31; (b) an 
annual reduction of 2.5 percent in direct Operation and Maintenance 
Costs; (c) the costs resulting from operation of Section 2 and 3 of 
Article III of the settlement; and (d) changes in the IG revenues to be 
subtracted from the Gathering Cost-of Service based on the maximum IG 
rate in effect each month during the prior 12 months ended October 31 
times the IG throughput for that same period. The recalculation 
produced and FG rate of $7.1506 per dth.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Sections 385.211 or 385.214). All such 
motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32243 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000106170
<NAME>WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                         PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                             735,004
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                           154,202
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 64,820
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                              322,621
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,276,647
<COMMON>                                               26,812
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                             151,496
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                    50,127
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                        228,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  16,500
<PREFERRED>                                            20,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                  289,671
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                     94,300
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                          60,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                               1,500
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                            10,389
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                       23,419
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                        532,272
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                       1,276,647
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                              97,686
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                    4,042
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             81,047
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             85,481
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                12,205
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                       (142)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                         12,455
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7,603
<NET-INCOME>                                            4,852
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                               728
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                           4,124
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                   0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 10,799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00
        




</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1173
YVONNE L. MURPHY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary, Dep artment of the Army, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-2243-CCB, CA-97-2264-CCB) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 27, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yvonne L. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration of the district court's denial of her motion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           1,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  554,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    566,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,143,733
<PP&E>                                         500,129
<DEPRECIATION>                                 261,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,528,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,070,713
<BONDS>                                        309,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          219,695
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (70,973)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,528,582
<SALES>                                      1,027,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,027,605
<CGS>                                          964,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  964,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,924)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,924)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John RALPH v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53826.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: John Ralph, applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made is not sufficient to warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction. See State v. Williams, 262 La. 769, 264 So.2d 638 (1972).