alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Dayong Sun, the Chief Executive Officer of Kama
Resources Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended,
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2011

/s/ Dayong Sun
Dayong Sun
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Joseph J. Sum, certifythat:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Continental Materials Corporation;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: May 17, 2005

 
|   | By:                                         | /s/ Joseph J. Sum |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph J. Sum                               |
|   | Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents

v. SAHEED O. SAUNDERS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 387 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 31st day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32521]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on December 17, 1997, 9:00 a.m., at the Board's meeting room 
on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:
    Portion open to the public:
    (1) Request to Post a GS-12 District Manager Position for the 
Little Rock, Arkansas District Office
    (2) Federal Ban on Smoking on Federal Property
    (3) Proposed Flexitime/Variable Workweek Changes
    (4) Strategic IRM Plan--1977-2002
    (5) Regulations:
    A. Part 209.12, Railroad Employers' Reports and Responsibilities
    B. Part 295, Payments Pursuant to Court Decree or Court-Approved 
Property Settlement
    (6) Year 2000 Issues
    (7) Labor Member Truth in Budgeting Status Report
    Portion closed to the public:
    (A) SES Performance Appraisals for FY-1997--Memo from Chairman, 
PRB.
    (B) SES Recertification for 1997.
    The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: December 8, 1997.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32521 Filed 12-9-97; 10:41 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63927-63928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-57-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

November 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 21, 1997, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of 
Northern Border Pipeline Company's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective January 
1, 1998:

Twelfth Revised Sheet Number 156
Eleventh Revised Sheet Number 157

    Northern Border proposes to decrease the Maximum Rate from 3.744 
cents per 100 Dekatherm-Miles to 3.735 cents per 100 Dekatherm-Miles 
and to decrease the Minimum Revenue Credit from 2.279 cents per 100 
Dekatherm-Miles to 1.616 cents per 100 Dekatherm-Miles. The revised 
Maximum Rate and Minimum Revenue Credit are being filed in accordance 
with Northern Border's Tariff provisions under Rate Schedule IT-1.
    The herein proposed changes do not result in a change in Northern 
Border's total revenue requirement.
    Northern Border states that copies of this filing have been sent to 
all of Northern Border's contracted shippers and interested state 
regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Section 385.214 and Section 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public

[[Page 63928]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31660 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LEONAR

D M ANEGENG, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-71841 Age n c y No. A095-629-993 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2014 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, SILVER M AN, a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Le ona rd M ane g e ng, a

native and c itiz e n of Indone sia , pe t itions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny i ng his m otion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e d ings. Our jurisdiction is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a b use of disc re tion theB IA’ s de nia l of a m otion to re ope n. N

ajmabadi v . 

# FIL ED JAN 24 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion by

de ny ing M a

n e ge ng’ s m o tion to re ope n a s untim e ly

be c a use the m otion wa s file d m ore tha n four y e ars a fte r the B IA’ s fina l orde r, se e8 C . F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2), and M ane ge ng did not dem onstra te m ate ria l ly c ha nge d c onditions in Indone sia to qua lify for the re gula

tory e xc e ption to the tim e lim it for filing motions to re ope n, s e e8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(3)(ii); N ajmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 987 (e vide nc e m

ust be “ qua l ita

tive ly diffe re nt” from

the e vide nc e pre se nte d at the pre vious he a ring). W e re

je c t M ane ge ng’ s c onte ntion tha t the B IA fa ile d to a de quate ly c onside r the e v ide nc e pre se nte d with them otion to re ope n . Se e N

ajmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 990-91. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the B IA’ s disc re tiona ry de c ision not to re ope n re m ova l proc e e d ings sua

sponte . Se eMe

j ia-He rnande

z v . Holde r , 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th C ir. 2011). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 2 - 7 1 8 4 1 2
#### J. T. CULBERSON v. Eloise C. LAND et al.

No. 45639.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 16, 1970.

Brooks Ferris, III, Laurel, for appellant.

L. P. Spinks, Jr., DeKalb, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Order entered September 24, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00332

- CR

JAMES ANTHONY KIRVIN

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Tri al Court Cause No. 060407

- 59



### O RDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s September 18, 2013 pro se motion to obtain a copy of the

record. Appellant is represented by counsel who filed a brief on the merits and is not entitled to

hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State , 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2306 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2306

 To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to apportionments 
       to small transit intensive cities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2021

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Stanton, Mr. Palazzo, 
 and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to apportionments 
       to small transit intensive cities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Community Transit Improvement 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. APPORTIONMENTS.

    Section 5336(h)(3) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(3) of amounts not apportioned under paragraphs (1) and 
        (2), 3.0 percent shall be apportioned to urbanized areas with 
        populations of less than 200,000 in accordance with subsection 
        (i);''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15.1




To Northeast Utilities:

We are aware that Northeast Utilities has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements No. 33-34622, No. 33-40156, No. 33-44814, No. 33-63023,
No. 33-55279, No. 33-56537, No. 333-52413, No. 333-52415, and No. 333-85613,
its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, which includes our report
dated August 9, 2001, covering the unaudited interim financial information
contained therein.  Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933,
that report is not considered a part of the registration statement  prepared
or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within
the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.  It should be noted that we have
not performed any procedures subsequent to August 9, 2001.





     /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
         Arthur Andersen LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
August 9, 2001


Readers of these consolidated financial statements should be aware that this
report is a copy of a previously issued Arthur Andersen LLP report and that
this report has not been reissued by Arthur Andersen LLP.  Furthermore, this
report has not been updated since August 9, 2001, and Arthur Andersen LLP
completed its last post-audit review of December 31, 2001, consolidated
financial information on May 13, 2002.
Presidential Documents

65005

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 237

Wednesday, December 10, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 98–6 of December 2, 1997

Report to Congress Regarding Conditions in Burma and U.S.

Policy Toward Burma

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the requirements set forth under the heading ‘‘Policy Toward

Burma’’ in section 570(d) of the FY 1997 Foreign Operations Appropriations

Act, as contained in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act (Public

Law 104–208), a report is required every 6 months following enactment

concerning:

1) progress toward democratization in Burma;

2) progress on improving the quality of life of the Burmese people, including progress on market reforms, living standards, labor standards, use of

forced labor in the tourism industry, and environmental quality; and

3) progress made in developing a comprehensive, multilateral strategy

to bring democracy to and improve human rights practices and the quality

of life in Burma, including the development of a dialogue between the

State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) and democratic opposition

groups in Burma.

You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit the attached report

fulfilling this requirement to the appropriate committees of the Congress

and to arrange for publication of this memorandum in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, December 2, 1997. [FR Doc. 97–32476

Filed 12–9–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
| (1)   | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                                              |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 10, 2011   | By:    | /s/ Gene Maher                          |   |
|                           |   | Gene Maher                                        |   |
|                           |   | Principal Executive OfficerNortheast Island Corp. |   |
|                           |   |                                              |   |
#### Roosevelt SAMUELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-775.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Edward J. Hanlon, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.
#### Bert TANNEN, Appellant, v. Broward WILLIAMS, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-468.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1971.

Louis Stoskopf of Martin S. Saxon, Miami Law Offices, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur C. Canaday, and Robert J. Vossler, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32418]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Supplementary Agreement on Social Security Between the United 
States and Canada; Entry Into Force

    The Commissioner of Social Security gives notice that a 
supplementary agreement entered into force on October 1, 1997, which 
amends the Social Security agreement between the United States (U.S.) 
and Canada that has been in effect since August 1, 1984. The 
supplementary agreement, which was signed on May 28, 1996, was 
concluded pursuant to section 233 of the Social Security Act.
    The supplementary agreement amends the original agreement to update 
and clarify several provisions. Its primary purpose, however, is to 
provide Canada with explicit legal authorization to enter into a mutual 
assistance arrangement on Social Security with the United States. A 
mutual assistance arrangement will allow the Social Security 
Administration and the Canadian Social Security agency to assist each 
other in projects that will enhance the integrity of each country's 
payments to its beneficiaries in the other country.
    Individuals who wish to obtain copies of the supplementary 
agreement or want general information about its provisions may write to 
the Social Security Administration, Office of International Policy, 
Post Office Box 17741, Baltimore, Maryland 21235. Anyone who wants 
information about the Canadian social security system should write to: 
International Operations Directorate, Income Security Programs Branch, 
Department of Human Resources Development, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 
OL4.

    Dated: November 7, 1997.
Kenneth S. Apfel,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 97-32418 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-U
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                             COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Six Months Ended
                                              June 30,                                 Year Ended December 31,
                                     ------------------------   -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        2000           1999        1999          1998         1997           1996            1995
                                     ---------      ---------   ---------     ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------
<S>                                  <C>            <C>         <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
Interest Expense                     $  44,900      $  25,400   $  55,200     $ 101,900     $  90,400      $ 142,100      $ 151,000

Capitalized Interest                     2,075             --          --            --            --             --             --

Estimated Interest Portion of
    Rent Expense                         7,953          7,092      13,948        12,352        10,864         10,035         10,064
                                     ---------      ---------   ---------     ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

Fixed Charges                        $  54,928      $  32,492   $  69,148     $ 114,252     $ 101,264      $ 152,135      $ 161,064
                                     =========      =========   =========     =========     =========      =========      =========

Income From Continuing
    Operations Before Income Taxes   $ 272,100      $ 255,600   $ 518,600     $ 523,600     $ 483,200      $ 470,700      $ 297,300

Add:  Fixed Charges                     52,853         32,492      69,148       114,252       101,264        152,135        161,064

      Dividends From Less Than
      50% Owned Companies                   --             --          --            --            --            287            968

Less: Equity in (Earnings) / Losses
      of Less Than 50% Owned
      Companies                         (2,561)           (46)     (1,069)          595          (320)        (1,609)          (996)
                                     ---------      ---------   ---------     ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

Earnings Before Fixed Charges        $ 322,392      $ 288,046   $ 586,679     $ 638,447     $ 584,144      $ 621,513      $ 458,336
                                     =========      =========   =========     =========     =========      =========      =========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges        5.9x           8.9x        8.5x          5.6x          5.8x           4.1x           2.8x
</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wniteb ~tate5 (!Court of §Weals 

for !be jf eberal (!Cirroit 

FIBER OPTIC DESIGNS, 

Appellant, 

v. 

DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, 

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

OFFICE, 

Appellee, 

AND 

SEASONAL SPECIALITIES, LLC, 

Appellee. 

2012·1058 

(Reexamination No. 95/000,137) 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Bradley J. Thorson moves to withdraw as counsel of 

record for Seasonal Specialties, LLC. 
FIBER OPTIC v. KAPPOS 2 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. New counsel for Seasonal Specialties LLC should promptly file an entry of appearance. 

JAN 092012 

Date 

cc: Matthew Stavish, Esq. 

s21 

Raymond T. Chen, Esq. 

Bradley J. Thorson, Esq. 

Michael Lasky, Esq. 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

FILED 

u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

llIE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

JAN 092012 

JAN HORBALV 

CLERK