alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 12, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 205590 

To whom it may concern, 

KEY AIR 

Key Air, LLC would like to officially request to extend exemption number 10311, regulatory 

docket no. FAA-2011-0037. The Key Air, LLC exemption is set to expire on July 31, 2015. 

Additionally, the extended exemption, 10311 referenced above, should be edited to reflect 

the correct regulatory reference: FAR 135.225(f). 

Respectfully, 

r--.,~ \ 

\ -\'J ("\ A Antho~y ~\~~i~Tero -··-··--~ Chief Pilot 

Key Air, LLC 

KEY AIR LLC 3 Juliano Drive, Suite 201, Oxford, CT 06478 203.264.0605 tel 203.264.0218 fax
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64593-64594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 95N-0329]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Changes to an Approved 
Application'' has been approved by the Office of

[[Page 64594]]

Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(the PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 24, 1997 (62 
FR 39890 to 39903), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 
section 3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507). An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 
OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB 
control number 0910-0315. The approval expires on September 30, 2000.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-32024 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2014

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/25 9/29 10/2 30.00 24.00 24.00 88.00 -10.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 10/2 10/6 10/9 32.00 24.00 27.00 83.00 0.00

10/9 10/13 10/16 33.00 24.00 30.00 25.00 100.00 12.00

10/16 10/20 10/23 34.00 24.00 30.00 89.00 -1.00

10/23 10/27 10/30 34.00 24.00 30.00 80.00 8.00

10/30 11/3 11/6 36.00 24.00 30.00 83.00 7.00

11/6 11/10 11/13 36.00 24.00 30.00 110.00 -20.00

11/13 11/17 11/20 35.00 24.00 30.00 25.00 86.00 28.00

11/20 11/24 11/27 35.00 24.00 30.00 86.00 3.00

11/27 12/1 12/4 35.00 24.00 30.00 87.00 2.00

12/4 12/8 12/11 35.00 24.00 30.00 110.00 -21.00

12/11 12/15 12/18 35.00 24.00 30.00 25.00 82.00 32.00

12/18 12/22 12/25 34.00 24.00 30.00 82.00 6.00

1212.00 1166.00 46.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 10/2 10/7 10/15 27.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 10/2 10/8 10/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 10/2 10/9 10/15 13.00 0.00 32.00 29.00

30-year TIPS ® 10/16 10/23 10/31 7.00 0.00

2-year note 10/23 10/28 10/31 29.00 0.00

5-year note 10/23 10/29 10/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 10/23 10/30 10/31 29.00 0.00

2-year FRN 10/23 10/29 10/31 15.00 0.00 77.01 37.99

3-year Note 11/5 11/12 11/17 26.00 -1.00

10-year Note 11/5 11/13 11/17 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 11/5 11/14 11/17 16.00 0.00 59.92 6.08

2-year FRN ® 11/13 11/19 11/28 13.00 0.00

10-year TIPS ® 11/13 11/20 11/28 13.00 0.00 0.00 26.00

2-year note 11/20 11/24 12/1 28.00 -1.00

5-year note 11/20 11/25 12/1 35.00 0.00

7-year note 11/20 11/26 12/1 29.00 0.00 78.26 13.74

3-year Note 12/4 12/9 12/15 25.00 -1.00

10-year Note ® 12/4 12/10 12/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 12/4 12/11 12/15 13.00 0.00 33.17 25.83

2-year FRN ® 12/18 12/24 12/26 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

2-year note 12/11 12/16 12/31 27.00 -1.00

5-year note 12/11 12/17 12/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 12/11 12/18 12/31 29.00 0.00

5-year TIPS ® 12/11 12/18 12/31 16.00 0.00 78.24 28.76

539.00 358.61 180.39

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 226
#### In re ESTATE of William Louis KUHNS a/k/a William L. Kuhns, Deceased.

No. 70-709.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 11, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### AMERICAN MOTORISTS INS. CO., Appellant, v. Howard Seth WEINGARTEN, a minor by his next friend and natural father, Charles Weingarten, and Charles Weingarten, Individually, Appellees.

No. GG-7.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 8, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1978.

Cliff B. Gosney, Jr., of Gosney, Cameron & Parsons, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robyn Greene of Greene & Cooper, Miami, Arno Kutner of Preddy, Kutner & Hardy, Miami, and Dennis A. Koltun, Coral Gables, for appellees.

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

The insurer appeals from a summary judgment for the insured, finding that (a) underinsured motorist insurance to the extent of the bodily injury liability coverage was provided the insured who was not offered and did not reject coverage to that extent, as provided in Section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1975); and (b) the insured was entitled to stack the amounts of additional uninsured motorist coverage thus provided by the policy, which insured against bodily injury liability in respect to four vehicles. The insured testified without contradiction that he was not offered uninsured motorist coverage equal to the bodily injury liability coverage afforded, and therefore that he had not rejected such coverage. The insured did not sign a written rejection of additional uninsured motorist coverage, and the only countervailing evidence was testimony by the agent, who testified only that his general practice was to offer insureds uninsured motorist coverage in accordance with Section 627.727(1).

We agree with the trial court that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact; that an informed rejection of additional uninsured motorist coverage cannot, without extrinsic evidence, be implied from the insured’s signature on an application for uninsured motorist coverage to lower limits; that the insurer otherwise offered no competent evidence that the insured rejected the additional coverage required by Section 627.727(1); and that the insured is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. Green,*327 So.2d 65 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), *cert. denied,*336 So.2d 1179 (Fla.1976); *Government Employees Ins. Co.*v. *Farmer,*330 So.2d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), *cert. denied,*342 So.2d 1101 (Fla.1977); *Hunt v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.,*349 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Appellees’ petition for fees on account of appellate legal services is granted, the amount to be determined and awarded in the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 15



November 7, 2003


Northeast Utilities
107 Selden Street
Berlin, CT 06037


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries for the periods ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002, as indicated in our report dated November 7, 2003;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-34622, 333-55142,
33-40156, 333-105273, and 333-108712 on Forms S-3 and Nos. 33-44814, 33-
63023, 333-52413, 333-52415, 333-106008, and 333-63144 on Forms S-8 of
Northeast Utilities.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the
Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report
prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and
11 of that Act.


/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP
     Deloitte & Touche LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 January 17, 2006 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-11887

 

D. C. Docket No. 03-00132 CV-JEC-1

EULICE M. HOLLIMAN,

and others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

 

(January 17, 2006)

Before DUBINA and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG*, Judge.

PER CURIAM:

_________________________

*Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by

designation.
2

Appellant Eulice M. Holliman (“Holliman”) appeals the district court’s

grant of summary judgment against her in her gender discrimination action against

her employer, defendant/appellee Clark Atlanta University (“Clark”), and former

supervisor, defendant/appellee Nathaniel Roberts, Jr. (“Roberts”). 

The issues presented on appeal are (1) whether the district court properly

granted the defendants’ motion to strike the declaration of Richard McLemore;

and (2) whether the district court properly granted summary judgment to the

defendants because Holliman could not establish a prima facie case of genderbased hostile work environment discrimination.

We review evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion and will reverse the

district court’s decision only in cases where substantial prejudice exists. See Hall

v. United Ins. Co. of Am., 367 F.3d 1255, 1259 (11th Cir. 2004). Indeed, “[t]he

district court has a range of options; and so long as the district court does not

commit a clear error in judgment, we will affirm the district court’s decision.” 

Young v. City of Palm Bay, Fla., 358 F.3d 859, 863 (11th Cir. 2004).

We review de novo a district court’s order granting summary judgment,

viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. 

Green v. Union Foundry Co., 281 F.3d 1229, 1233 (11th Cir. 2002).
3

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs and having the benefit

of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s order striking McLemore’s

declaration and its grant of summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

  

In connection with the Annual Report ofTrunkbow International Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ye Yuan Jun, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

 

March 30**,** 2012
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.    /s/
Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer    /s/
David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  May 8, 2009    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FOR DOCKET:Fw: Tailoring rule step 3 - Technical Support Documents for 

review

Juan Santiago to: Pam Long 02/24/2012 02:02 PM

From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

----- Forwarded by Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/24/2012 02:02 PM -----

From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Ghorbi, Darian" <Darian_E_Ghorbi@omb.eop.gov>, "Frey, Nathan J." 

<Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>, 

Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, MichaelS Brooks/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynn 

Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/16/2012 03:28 PM

Subject: Re: Tailoring rule step 3 - Technical Support Documents for review

Darian and Nathan,

Per my email this morning, attached is the regulatory language for your review. This piece will go in the 

docket as part of the technical support documents.

Thanks!

Juan 

Synthetic Minor Reg Text 2-16-12.docx

Juan Santiago Good morning Darian and Nathan, Per your offic... 02/16/2012 09:30:45 AM

From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>, "Ghorbi, Darian" 

<Darian_E_Ghorbi@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>, 

Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, MichaelS Brooks/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynn 

Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/16/2012 09:30 AM

Subject: Tailoring rule step 3 - Technical Support Documents for review

Good morning Darian and Nathan,

Per your office's request, attached are the 2 technical support documents presenting the step 3 

rulemaking thresholds and emissions coverage analysis. In addition, I will be forwarding you the 

regulatory text that will be included in the docket for your review around lunch time today.

Please don't hesitate to contact me if there are any questions.

Thanks!

Juan E. Santiago

(919) 541-1084

[attachment "TS3 Threshold Analysis TSD Draft Clean.docx" deleted by Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US] 
[attachment "Step 3 Burden TSD Clean Draft.docx" deleted by Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US]
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:12 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj; Culligan, Kevin 

Subject: RE: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: 

Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 

Handout 4 has suggested regulatory text. 

From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:10 PM 

To: fellner.christian@epa.gov; 'Wayland, Robertj'; Culligan, Kevin 

(Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov) 

Subject: RE: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: 

Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 

Hi all, 

Consistent with EO 12866, attached are the handouts from this meeting. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_28_GHGExisting_FOTE_HANDOUT1.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_28_GHGExisting_FOTE_HANDOUT2.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_28_GHGExisting_FOTE_HANDOUT3.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_28_GHGExisting_FOTE_HANDOUT4.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_28_GHGExisting_FOTE_HANDOUT5.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_28_GHGExisting_FOTE_HANDOUT6.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_28_GHGExisting_FOTE_HANDOUT7.pdf >> 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission 

Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 

Generating Units 

When: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 4:00 PM-4:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

This meeting was requested by Kate DeAngelis, Friends of the Earth.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

North Carolina

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within North Carolina 

over $734 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Latino Community Credit Union Durham CDFI & MDI $ 99,436,000 

Local Government Federal Credit Union Raleigh CDFI $ 52,500,000 

M&F Bancorp, Inc. Durham MDI $ 80,000,000 

Marine Federal Credit Union Jacksonville CDFI $ 9,680,000 

Self-Help Credit Union Durham CDFI & MDI $ 243,000,000 

Self-Help Federal Credit Union Durham CDFI & MDI $ 250,000,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
Exhibit 99

CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS STATEMENT
(Unaudited)



|                             | Twelve Months
EndedSeptember 30, 2005
|---------------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                             | (millions)                           
|Operating Revenue            | $7,356                               
|                             |                                      
|Operating Expenses           | 6,367                                
|                             |                                      
|Income from operations       | 989                                  
|                             |                                      
|Other income (loss)          | 32                                   
|                             |                                      
|Interest and related charges | 214                                  
|                             |                                      
|Income before income taxes   | 807                                  
|                             |                                      
|Income taxes                 | 293                                  
|                             |                                      
|Net income                   | $   514
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, WILLIAM J. MURPHY, certifythat:

 

1.    Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMPUTER HORIZONSCORP.;

 

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects, thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)    disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)    anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

 
| Date:                   | November 9, 2004 |   |
|-------------------------|------------------|--------|
|                    |             |   |
| /s/ William J. Murphy   |             |
| WILLIAM J. MURPHY       |             |
| Chief Executive Officer |             |

 

----