alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC. v. Harold NASH.

No. 5947.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1974.

Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Toler & Sarpy, Wiley G. Lastrapes, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Lawrence L. Lagarde, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant

Before REDMANN, and STOULIG, JJ„ and FLEMING, J. Pro Tem.

ROBERT M. FLEMING, Judge Pro Tem.

Defendant-appellant, Harold Nash has prosecuted the instant appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of New Orleans Public Service, Inc., casting him to pay the sum of $598.06 together with legal interests and costs. The cause of action giving rise to this litigation involves an accident in which defendant-appellant’s' automobile collided with a public service pole owned by plaintiff-appellee.

*100The facts of the matter, succinctly stated are as follows:

Mr. Nash was travelling down Olive Street in the City of New Orleans, approaching its intersection with Lowerline Street. Upon reaching the corner he attempted a right-hand turn onto Lowerline Street; lost control of his vehicle and struck plaintiff’s utility pole. The damages involved have been stipulated as the amount for which defendant was cast and the only question involved is one of defendant’s liability.

It is defendant’s contention that the accident was an unavoidable one. He testified that in making the turn onto Lowerline Street his car engine killed, causing his brakes and steering to become nonoperative. As a result he struck the plaintiff’s utility pole.

 The trial court had the opportunity to hear the testimony of the defendant as to how the accident occurred and reached the conclusion, enunciated in his written reasons for judgment that “* * * the accident was caused solely through the fault and negligence of the defendant.” The court likewise specifically discounted defendant’s contention that his car engine had stopped, thereby precipitating the accident. It is well settled in our jurisprudence that the findings of the trial court are not to be disturbed or disregarded except in the case of manifest error. A careful review of the record discloses no error in the instant case.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Costs of this proceeding are to be borne by defendant-appellant.

Affirmed.

RED MANN, Judge

(concurring).

Subscribing to the court’s opinion, I add that defendant’s explanation even if believed does not exonerate him. See Metzger v. Scott, La.App.1971, 244 So.2d 671.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5789-5790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-37, RM-8975]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Victor, ID

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of West Wind Broadcasting requesting the allotment of 
Channel 222A to Victor, Idaho, as that community's first local aural 
transmission service. Coordinates used for Channel 222A at Victor are 
43-36-12 and 111-06-36. See also Supplementary Information, infra.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 24, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 8, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner, as follows: West Wind Broadcasting, Attn: 
Victor A. Michael, Jr., President, c/o Magic City Media, 1912 Capitol 
Ave., Suite 300, Cheyenne, WY 82001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-37, adopted January 
24, 1997, and released January 31, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Channel 282A has been proposed for allotment to Victor, Idaho in 
the context of MM Docket No. 97-33 (RM-8937). See Notice of Proposed 
Rule Making released January 24, 1997 (DA 97-96). In the event the 
earlier filed proposal is ultimately granted, the instant request

[[Page 5790]]

could provide an additional local FM service to Victor, Idaho.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-3124 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Treasury approves North Dakota’s plan to invest $68.3 million of CPF 

funding in multi-purpose community facilities to improve resources for 

communities that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

North Dakota

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $68.3 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (60% of 

CPF allocation)

 Program Description: North Dakota’s Career and

Technical Education (CTE) Multi-Purpose Community

Facility Grant Program is a competitive grant program

that will provide funding to establish CTE centers.

CTE centers will expand educational and career offerings

to post-secondary school students and adult learners as

well as provide expanded access to telehealth in areas of North Dakota where 

these services are limited. 

 Key State Contact: The North Dakota Department of Career and Technical 

Education

North Dakota’s Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

North Dakota 

estimates this program 

will fund at least 12 

CTE centers, serving 

more than 20,000 

individuals annually
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Oct - Dec

2008 Actual 556 569 (18) 551 (5) 367

Jan - Mar

2009 Actual 565 481 (14) 467 (98) 269

Apr - Jun

2009 Actual 278 343 (17) 327 49 318

Jul - Sep

2009 Actual 415 393 (20) 372 (43) 275

Oct - Dec

2009 Actual 340 260 (3) 258 (82) 194

Jan - Mar

2010 Actual 446 483 (12) 471 25 219

Apr - Jun

2010 Actual 263 344 (10) 334 71 290

Jul - Sep

2010 Actual 362 396 (14) 382 20 310

Oct - Dec

2010 Actual 326 363 (4) 359 33 343

Jan - Mar

2011 Actual 470 265 (20) 245 (225) 118

Apr - Jun

2011 Actual 149 190 (22) 167 19 137

Jul - Sep

2011 Actual 342 286 (23) 264 (79) 58

Oct - Dec

2011 Actual 284 310 2 312 28 86

Jan - Mar

2012 Actual 440 401 (3) 398 (42) 43

Apr - Jun

2012 Actual 129 172 5 177 48 91

Jul - Sep

2012 Actual 234 264 (36) 228 (6) 85

Oct - Dec

2012 Actual 291 297 1 298 7 93

Jan - Mar

2013 Actual 354 349 (8) 341 (14) 79

Apr - Jun

2013 Actual (73) (11) (7) (18) 56 135

Jul - Sep

2013 Actual 205 197 (38) 159 (46) 88

Oct - Dec

2013 Actual 179 264 (11) 253 74 162

Jan - Mar

2014 Actual 275 265 (10) 254 (20) 142

Apr - Jun

2014 Actual (60) (64) 1 (63) (3) 139

Jul - Sep August 4, 2014 176 192 (4) 187 11 150

2014 Actual 176 205 (10) 195 19 158

Forecast Revisions (1) 13 (5) 8 8 8

Oct - Dec August 4, 2014 191 187 (6) 181 (10) 140

2014 November 3, 2014 186 232 (5) 227 42 200

Forecast Revisions (6) 45 1 46 52 60

Jan - Mar

2015 November 3, 2014 302 209 (7) 202 (100) 100

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
Exhibit 10.1


 





AMENDMENT TO REGISTRATION
RIGHTS AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT TO THE REGISTRATION
RIGHTS AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 26, 2021 by and among Hertz Global Holdings,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and the stockholders listed on Exhibit A hereto (the “Holders”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Company and certain
of its stockholders are parties to the Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 30, 2021 (the “Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Holders hold
the requisite number of shares as set forth on Exhibit A hereto necessary to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 7.11 thereof;
and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the
Holders desire to amend the Agreement on the terms, and subject to the conditions, set forth herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement
is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.       Amendments.
Section 2.1(a) is amended to remove the phrase “after the Company’s Initial Public Offering”.


 


2.       Interpretation
and Reference. Unless defined hereunder, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


 


3.       Limitation.
This Amendment is limited as specified and shall not constitute a modification, acceptance or waiver of any other provision of the Agreement
or any other document.


 


4.       Governing
Law; Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial. This Amendment shall be subject to Section 7.2 of the Agreement.


 


5.       Notices.
Any and all notices, requests, consents and other communications hereunder and under the Agreement shall be sent in accordance with the
Agreement.


 


6.       Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[Remainder of the page intentionally
left blank.]


 






     


     


    

 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	 	HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ M. David Galainena
	 	Name:	M. David Galainena
	 	Title:	Executive Vice President, General Counsel &
    Secretary




 






     


     


    

 


	 	CK AMARILLO LP
	 	 
	 	By:	CK Amarillo GP, LLC
	 	Its:	General Partner
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Tom LaMacchia
	 	Name:	Tom LaMacchia
	 	Its:	Authorized Signatory
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Laura L. Torrado
	 	Name:	Laura L. Torrado
	 	Its:	Authorized Signatory




 






     


     


    

 





Exhibit A


 


	Holder	 	Number of Registrable Securities
	CK Amarillo, LP	 	196,673,104 shares of common stock
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEMS USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James A. Latty and
Richard W. York, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: February 22, 2006

/s/
--------------------------------
James A. Latty,
Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 22, 2006

/s/
--------------------------------
Richard W. York,
Chief Financial Officer


                                      -32-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NATHANIEL DANTE RICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-6178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NATHANIEL DANTE RICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (1:02-cr-00153-JAB; 1:05-cv-00574-JAB)

Submitted: April 25, 2007 Decided: June 1, 2007

 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Dante Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Nathaniel Dante Rice seeks

to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation

of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion and denying his motions for reconsideration and an

extension of time to file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The

orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rice has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Robert D.Hansen, certify that: 

          1. Ihave reviewed this Form 10-K Amendment of Electromed, Inc.; 

          2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in the this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operation, and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

          a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

          b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

          c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

          a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and 

          b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

- 5 -

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 42 (Monday, March 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 14151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04913]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8212]

Department of State Performance Review Board Members

    In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of 5 United States Code, the 
Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the 
Department of State Performance Review Board for Senior Executive 
Service members:

Dawn McCall, Chairperson, Coordinator, Office of International 
Information Programs, Department of State;
Gerard White, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Conflict and 
Stabilization Operations, Department of State;
Bathsheba Crocker, Principal Deputy Director, Office of Policy 
Planning, Department of State.

    Dated: February 25, 2013.
Linda Thomas-Greenfield,
Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human 
Resources, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-04913 Filed 3-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-15-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC98-19-000]


Entergy Arkansas, Inc.; Notice of Filing

December 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 26, 1997, Entergy Arkansas, Inc., 
filed additional information in the above referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before December 17, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31976 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/02

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 13.1


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Annual Report of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emanuele Lauro, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Date: March 18, 2016/s/ Emanuele LauroEmanuele LauroChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

October 8, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Receipt of the Confidentially Submitted Documents for Extreme Aerial Productions, LLC. (Docket 

FAA-2015-2844)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Extreme Aerial Productions, LLC’s manuals were confidentially submitted to 

333exemptions@faa.gov on September 28, 2015 and a receipt was returned on October 2, 2015. The 

confidential submission included:

1) Motion Picture & Television Operating Manual (MPTOM)

If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me 

at (561)222-6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________

Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.
#### James Sylvester CALLAHAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-937.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.