alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[for public release] 

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) 

Inspection of Mumbai Urban Transport Project (India) 

United States Position 

Board Date: March 28, 2006 

The Inspection Panel has provided a useful and comprehensive report. Based on a thorough 

review of the information provided in the Panel’s report and the Management’s response, we 

concur with the Panel findings regarding the Bank’s failure to comply with its policies on project 

preparation and appraisal, involuntary resettlement, environmental assessment, and project 

supervision. 

When the separate resettlement and rehabilitation project was folded into the primary 

construction project, it appears that valuable information and identified issues were lost. The 

most serious result was the switch from a comprehensive resettlement and rehabilitation project 

to a resettlement component that focused on replacing housing but not on income restoration. 

Given that it is well-known that income restoration is often the most difficult aspect of 

resettlement, it is difficult to understand why so little attention was paid to this issue. In 

particular, the Panel found that the resettlement analysis and plan failed to consider 

impoverishment risks as required by Bank policy. 

While the extreme crowding and high land prices of the Mumbai area make resettlement difficult 

and costly, the Business Needs Study commissioned by the Bank has outlined some of the 

options the project could have taken to help the shopkeepers restore or improve their standard of 

living, as required by Bank policy. 

The project also needs to focus more sharply on improving the income-generating opportunities 

of the resettled people who have lost informal jobs or customers due to their relocation. While it 

is likely that the project provided secure and improved housing for these people, their poverty 

implies that they have little to fall back on after experiencing even small income losses. The 

people who have rented out or sold their new houses are only the most obvious indicator of those 

most affected by this critical issue. 

A number of inspection panel reports over the years have highlighted the need for “increased 

emphasis on consultation” and “quality assurance of baseline data.” It is important for the 

management of the World Bank to take concrete steps to improve performance in these two 

critical areas. 

We support the Management’s proposed Action Plan to bring this project into compliance and to 

resolve the outstanding problems in this project. It is clear that the project has already improved 

public transportation in Mumbai – a major accomplishment – and provided secure housing to a 

significant number of people. Nonetheless, the challenges of resettling and rehabilitating the 

livelihoods of another large group of affected people remain. We look forward to the progress 

report Management intends to issue in October 2006.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65062-65063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 935]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status: Abbott Manufacturing, Inc. 
(Infant Formula, Adult Nutritional Products), Columbus, Ohio

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;
    Whereas, an application from the Rickenbacker Port Authority, 
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 138, for authority to establish special-
purpose subzone status for export activity at the infant formula and 
adult nutritional products manufacturing plant of Abbott Manufacturing, 
Inc., in Columbus, Ohio, was filed by the Board on April 9, 1996, and 
notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (FTZ 
Docket 28-96, 61 FR 17875, 4-23-96); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application 
for export manufacturing is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status at the Abbott Manufacturing, Inc., plant in Columbus, Ohio 
(Subzone 138C), at the location described in the application, subject 
to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28, and 
subject to the further requirement that all foreign origin, tariff rate 
quota dairy products and sugar admitted to the subzone shall be 
reexported.


[[Page 65063]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of December 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32355 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6267-6268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Subsistence Resource Commission meeting

SUMMARY: The Superintendent of Denali National Park and the Chairperson 
of the Subsistence Resource Commission for Denali National Park 
announce a forthcoming meeting of the Denali National Park Subsistence 
Resource Commission.
    The following agenda items will be discussed:

(1) Call to order by Chair.
(2) Roll call and confirmation of quorum.
(3) Superintendent's welcome and introductions.
(4) Approval of minutes of last meeting.
(5) Additions and corrections to agenda.
(6) Old business:
    a. Wildlife studies.
    b. NPS Subsistence Issue Paper report.
    c. Park planning and North Access updates.
(7) New business:
    a. Federal subsistence proposals.
    b. Regional Advisory Council actions.
    c. Denali subsistence resource management plan.
(8) Public and other agency comments.

[[Page 6268]]

(9) Determine time and date of next meeting.
(10) Adjourn.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, February 28, 1997. The meeting 
will begin at 9 a.m. and conclude around 6 p.m.

LOCATION: The meeting will be held at the Healy Community Center, 
Healy, Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Martin, Superintendent, Denali National Park and Preserve, PO Box 
9, Denali Park, Alaska 99755. Phone (907) 683-2294.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subsistence Resource Commissions are 
authorized under Title VIII, Section 808, of the Alaska National 
Interest Lands Conservation Act, Pub. L. 96-487, and operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committees Act.
Paul R. Anderson,
Acting Field Director.
[FR Doc. 97-3249 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32507]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-2-48-001]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

December 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 4, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, following revised tariff sheets proposed to become 
effective January 1, 1998:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 19
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 68H

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
to implement revised levels of Transporter's Use (%) as reflected on 
the fuel matrix in its tariff, as well as the percentages applicable to 
gathering. ANR will implement these interim fuel matrix percentages 
effective on the later of January 1, 1998, or the first day of the 
month following the date that the Commission accepts this filing.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section Regulations. All 
such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32507 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-46-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

November 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 12, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fifth Revised Volume 1, the following tariff sheets, to become 
effective December 12, 1997:

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 1
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 2
Original Sheet No. 205
Original Sheet No. 206
Original Sheet No. 207
Original Sheet No. 208
Original Sheet No. 209
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 1807
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 1808
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 1809
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 1810
Third Revised Sheet No. 1811
Second Revised Sheet No. 1812
Fourth Revised Sheet 1813
Second Revised Sheet No. 1814
Third Revised Sheet No. 4200
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 4201
Second Revised Sheet No. 4202

     Koch states that it is submitting the above listed tariff sheets 
to implement a new Daily No Fuel Interruptible Transportation Service 
on its system. This new service will allow customers on a daily basis 
to transport gas from specifically identified receipt points to 
specifically identified delivery points without having to pay a fuel 
charge.
    Any person desiring to be heard to protest this filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
by Section 154.210 of the Commission's rules and regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a part must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30752 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### William H. BRUCE, Appellant, v. Benjamin F. HESTER, Appellee.

No. 72-1205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Countrywide Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Angelo R. Mozilo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ ANGELO R. MOZILO      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Angelo R. Mozilo          |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |
| May 8, 2006          |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Countrywide Financial Corporation and will be retained byCountrywide Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
#### COTTON’S HOLSUM EMPLOYEES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David A. SILERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2793.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

May 7, 1969.

Donald R. Miller, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

Gist, Methvin & Trimble, Alexandria (James T. Trimble, Jr., Alexandria, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Polk & Foote, by William P. Polk, Alexandria, for defendant-appellee.

*Motions to Dismiss the Appeal.*

En Bañe.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit upon a note secured by a chattel mortgage against several defendants. One codefendant, David A. Silers, filed an exception pleading improper venue. The exception was overruled. Silers appeals from the final judgment overruling said exception. The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal.

We sustain the motion. The judgment overruling an exception of improper venue is a nonappealable interlocutory judgment.

Under LSA-C.C.P. Article 2083, only interlocutory judgments causing irreparable injury may be appealed. Judgments overruling exceptions are interlocutory; and, ordinarily, they do not cause irreparable injury, because, upon appeal from a final judgment on the merits, a decree of the appellate court may restore the ex-ceptor to the identical position under the pleadings he occupied before the rendering of the interlocutory decree or order complained of. Rapides Cent. Ry. Co. v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 207 La. 870, 22 So.2d 200; Lounsberry v. Hoffpauir, La.App. 3d Cir., 199 So.2d 553; see also discussion in Broussard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App. 3d Cir., 204 So.2d 714.

*653The defendant-appellant is to pay the costs of this appeal; all other costs to await the final disposition of this appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

CULPEPPER, J., recused.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2417 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2417

 To distribute certain unobligated COVID-19 relief funds to States on 
     the basis of the number of school-aged children in each State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To distribute certain unobligated COVID-19 relief funds to States on 
     the basis of the number of school-aged children in each State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Every Student Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF UNOBLIGATED RELIEF FUNDS.

    Any Federal funds made available to the Secretary of Education on 
an emergency or supplemental basis to prevent, prepare for, or respond 
to the coronavirus pandemic, which as of the date of enactment of this 
Act, remain unobligated shall be distributed to each State on the basis 
of the number of children aged 5 through 17 in such State counted in 
the most recent census data approved by the Secretary of Education, as 
compared to the number of such children in all States.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF 

REGIONAL COUNSEL 

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with EarthJustice re: Washington Proposed SIP Correction 

 

FROM: Julie Vergeront 

 Assistant Regional Counsel 

DATE: March 25, 2011 

TO: Docket No. EPA-R10-OAR-2011, FRL-9285-6 

The purpose of this memo is to summarize a conference call between EPA and 

representatives of EarthJustice on March 25, 2011 regarding a proposed correction to the 

Washington State Implementation Plan (SIP) published in the Federal Register on March 23, 

2011. See 76 Fed. Reg. 16365. 

EarthJustice requested this meeting with Janet McCabe, Principal Deputy Administrator 

for the Office of Air and Radiation. Patti Goldman and Janette Brimmer participated on behalf 

of EarthJustice. Janet McCabe, Sara Froikin, Rich Ossias, Jim Havard, Scott Mathias, Debra 

Suzuki, Kristin Hall, Janis Hastings, and Julie Vergeront participated on behalf of EPA. 

EPA advised that because EPA is in the midst of a public comment period on the 

proposed SIP correction, EPA would be putting a summary of the meeting in the administrative 

record for the proposed action. EPA then asked that EarthJustice submit during the public 

comment period written comments addressing the issues EarthJustice would like EPA to 

consider in the proposed SIP correction. The EarthJustice representatives said they planned on 

doing so. 

EarthJustice stated that it did not believe EPA’s action in the proposed correction to limit 

these provisions of the Washington SIP to pollutants with National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) and NAAQS precursors—thus excluding greenhouse gases-- is consistent 

with the long term policy goals of EPA and this administration to reduce greenhouse gases. 

EarthJustice believes that SIPs should be available as a tool for states to address greenhouse 

gases. 

EPA stated that we would consider all comments submitted during the public comment 

period.
Date: June 24 , 201 3

Subject: Analysis of Default Biogenic CO 2 Fraction for Municipal Solid Waste

(MSW) EPA Contract No. EP
-W
- 11
- 054; Task Order No. 04 From: RTI

International
To: Mike Hannan

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460
**I. Introduction**  Several commenters disagreed with EPA’s recent proposal to reduce the default municipal solid waste (MSW) biogenic CO 2 fraction to 0.55 and requested that EPA use the actual MSW fractions reported by all municipal waste combustors (MWCs ) for the first three ye ars of the GHGRP (2010
- 2012) to determine an appropriate default. EPA performed an analys is of all quarterly

MSW biogenic CO 2 fractions (determined using ASTM D7459
- 08 and ASTM D6866
- 08) submitted through the GHGRP in reporting ye ars 2010 through 2012. **II. Summary of Analysis and Findings**  The initial data set for Subpart C was reviewed to identify all units that combusted MSW from 2010 to 2012. The quarterly MSW biogenic CO 2 fractions were then averaged for each MWC to determine each unit’s annual average MSW biogenic CO 2 fraction. Weighted average s (based on the reported unit level biogenic CO 2 emissions) and straight averages were then determined for all MWC for each ye ar and for the entire three year period for which data is available. Substitute data was used for units that did not report biogenic fractions (as required b y rule), but did report emissions from the combustion of MSW. I n this event, biogenic fractions from the same unit, but a different ye ar were substituted (e .g., Unit A reported biogenic frac tions for 2012, but not 2011. 2 012 fractions were substituted for Unit A in 2011). RY 2012 is the first ye ar that reporting of quarterly MSW biogenic CO2 fractions is required. Retroactive submittals for RY 2010 and 2011 are also required. Verification of the MSW fraction data is currently on going. Table 1 summarizes the results of this analysis.**Table 1**

**– Summary of Findings from MSW Biogenic CO2 Fraction Analysis** 

**Parameter 2010**  **2011 2012**  **2010 -** **2012** Total Units in Analysis 133 139 144 416 Number of Substitute Units 2 5 2 9 Percent Substituted 1.5% 3.6% 1.4% 2.2% Minimum Biogenic Fraction 0.52 0.38 0.52 0.38 Maximum Biogenic Fraction 0.87 0.79 0.72 0.87 Weighted Average Fraction 0.64 0.62 0.61 0.62 Average Fraction 0.64 0.62 0.61 0.62
EXHIBIT 31.3



CERTIFICATION



I, Jeremiah Silkowski, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofSQN Alternative Investment Fund III L.P.; and                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



Date:
April 15, 2019



|/s/
    Jeremiah Silkowski    | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Jeremiah Silkowski            | 
|Chief Financial Officer       | 
|(Principal Financial Officer) |