alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, David A. Shadduck, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TruServ Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
TruServ as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. TruServ's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for TruServ and we have:

          a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
          TruServ, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b. evaluated the effectiveness of TruServ's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c. disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
          fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
          affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
          registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. TruServ's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to TruServ's auditors and the audit committee of TruServ's
board of directors:

          a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
          or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to
          adversely affect TruServ's ability to record, process, summarize and
          report financial information; and

          b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in TruServ's internal
          control over financial reporting.


TRUSERV CORPORATION

Date: November 15, 2004

By /s/ DAVID A. SHADDUCK
   ---------------------
   David A. Shadduck
   Senior Vice President and
   Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph ANDERSON.

No. 59991.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Robert W. Tillery, Ponchatoula, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard E. Yo-kum, Dist. Atty., William M. Quin, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TATE, Justice

(dissenting).

I recognize that a serious issue exists whether the excessiveness of the sentence may be raised for the first time by a hearing sought following the conviction, sentence, and perfection of the appeal. La.C. Cr.P. art. 916; *State v. Williams,*340 So.2d 1382 (La.1976). Cf., La.C.Cr.P. art. 363. Nevertheless, the post-conviction hearing shows that the defendant, a wage earner of stable family with four living children and without previous criminal record, was involved in a fight with a man who frequently got into barroom fights and was of bad community reputation. Although the circumstances may not relieve the defendant of guilt, the life sentence was excessive insofar as it prevented suspension of sentence or parole for forty years. La.Const. Art. 1, Section 20 (1974); *State v. Williams,*340 So.2d 1382, 1384 (concurring opinion) (La.1976). I therefore respectfully dissent from affirmance of the sentence, insofar as parole and suspension of sentence are excluded for that length of time.
Treasury approves Rhode Island’s plan to invest $81.7 million of CPF 

funding in multi-purpose community facilities to improve resources for 

communities that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Rhode Island

 

▪ Program Summary: $81.7 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (73% of 

CPF allocation)

▪ Program Description: A formula grant program 

available to the state’s 39 municipalities to construct 

or rehabilitate multipurpose community facilities 

accessible to all residents. Grants will be awarded 

based on the municipalities’ population and per 

capita income, among other factors, with the goal

of equitably distributing funding for necessary projects throughout the state while 

also prioritizing projects in low-income areas. Multi-purpose community facilities 

funded under this program will offer targeted programming to improve education 

and student performance, provide workforce training for better and higher-paying 

jobs, and help residents better monitor their physical and mental health. 

▪ Key State Contact: The Pandemic Recovery Office within Rhode Island’s 

Department of Administration

Rhode Island Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Rhode Island estimates 

this program will fund 

approximately 40 

facilities that will be 

available to 900,000 

individuals.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-65-000]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 26, 1997, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an 
effective date of January 1, 1998:

Thirty-Third Revised Sheet No. 32
Thirty-Third Revised Sheet No. 33
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 34

    CNG states that the purpose of this filing is to coordinate its 
rate increase as to small customers with the effective date of CNG's 
ongoing general rate proceeding in Docket No. RP97-406.
    CNG states that copies of its filing have been mailed to CNG's 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211). All such motions or 
protests should be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a part must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32133 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wilbert CLEVELAND.

No. 62370.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Wilbert Cleveland applying for supervisory writs. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Denied.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2162 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit fleeing law enforcement 

officers enforcing immigration laws, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mr. ROSENDALE (for himself, Mr. STEUBE, Ms. HERRELL, Mr. GOHMERT, 

Mr. BROOKS, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. BUDD, Mr. HICE

of Georgia, and Mr. GOOD of Virginia) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit fleeing 

law enforcement officers enforcing immigration laws, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminalize Fleeing 

5 from Immigration Enforcement Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLEEING ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 758 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2162 IH

1 ‘‘§ 758. Fleeing enforcement of immigration laws 

2 ‘‘Whoever— 

3 ‘‘(1) flees or evades a Federal, State, or local 

4 law enforcement officer, which officer has identified 

5 himself as such an officer, enforcing section 

6 274(a)(1)(A)(i) or (ii), section 274(a)(2), section 

7 275, section 276, or section 277 of the Immigration 

8 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324, 1325, 1326, 

9 1327); or 

10 ‘‘(2) flees or evades a checkpoint operated by 

11 the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or any 

12 other Federal law enforcement agency, and flees 

13 Federal, State, or local law enforcement agents, 

14 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 

15 five years, or both, or, in the case of flight or evasion in 

16 motor vehicle in excess of the legal speed limit, shall be 

17 fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 8 years, 

18 or both.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 for chapter 35 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

21 by striking the item related to section 758 and inserting 

22 the following: 

‘‘758. Fleeing enforcement of immigration laws.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of OFS Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jeffrey A. Cerny, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Jeffrey A. CernyName:Jeffrey A. CernyDate:March 4, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000880416
<NAME>NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  652,689
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 28,861
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      74,531
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   255,624
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,011,705
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  160,999
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         65,612
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             226,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       475,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               20,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             290,093
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>            1,011,705
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   68,169
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         5,795
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  45,551
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  54,521
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     13,648
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (509)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              16,314
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     9,405
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,909
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                6,909
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      39,350
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        




</TABLE>
256 La. 901

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Alton STOKES v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50916.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1970.

In re: Alton Stokes applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER INDICATED AS
REPORTED ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,036,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,005,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,257,700
<PP&E>                                       2,420,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,214,800)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,473,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,677,500
<BONDS>                                      1,334,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       615,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,036,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,473,100
<SALES>                                      1,343,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,343,100
<CGS>                                          912,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  912,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                146,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             92,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
        

</TABLE>
#### Fabiola CLAUDIO and Jose Claudio, Appellants, v. MIAMI AEROSPACE ACADEMY, INC., Appellee.

No. 73-591.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 12, 1974.

Jerry Larotonda, Miami, for appellants.

Adams, George, Wood, Schulte & Thompson and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J„ and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this action for damages for personal injury received by the plaintiff-appellant Fabiola Claudio, in which plaintiffs alleged negligence and the defendant pleaded contributory negligence, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant and the plaintiffs appealed.

The evidence before the court at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, which was a discovery deposition of the injured plaintiff, did not show conclusively that genuine issues of material fact did not exist. The deposition testimony did not conclusively establish the absence of negligence but tended to support the allegation thereof, and it did not establish that the injured plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. See Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40.

The summary judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. See Hoffman v. Jones, Fla.1973, 280 So.2d 431; Butler v. Woolco Department Store, Fla.App. 1973, 284 So.2d 434.
Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = JFK

Season = S

Holder = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2011 (Current & Future)

04/05/2012 12:23:58

Query Parameters:
04/05/2012 12:23:58

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2011 (Current & Future)

JFK

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 189 

AAR ASIANA AIRLINES 2 

ABX ABX AIR 2 

AEA AIR EUROPA 2 

AEW AEROSVIT AIRLINES 2 

AFL AEROFLOT 2 

AFR AIR FRANCE 10 

AIC AIR INDIA 6 

AJM AIR JAMAICA 6 

AMX AEROMEXICO 7 

ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 2 

AUA AUSTRIAN 2 

AVA AVIANCA 3 

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4 

AZA ALITALIA 6 

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 18 

BER AIR BERLIN 2 

BWA CARIBBEAN AIRLINES 5 

CAO AIR CHINA CARGO 2 

CAY CAYMAN AIRWAYS 2 

CCA AIR CHINA 2 

CES CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 1 

CKS KALITTA FLYING SERVICES (AMERICAN INT'L 1 

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 8 

CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 9 

CSA CZECH AIRLINES 2 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 408 

DHL DHL 1 

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8 

EIA EVERGREEN 1 

EIN AER LINGUS 6 

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 4 

ETD ETIHAD 2 

FDX FED EX 3 

FIN FINNAIR 2 

IBE IBERIA AIRWAYS 4 

ICE ICELANDAIR 2 

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2 

JAL JAPAN AIR LINES 3 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 348 

KAC KUWAIT AIRWAYS 1 

KAL KOREAN AIR 3 

KLM KLM ROYAL DUTCH 4 

LAN LAN AIRLINES 6 

LNE LAN ECUADOR 2 

MSR EGYPT AIR 2 

MXA MEXICANA DE AVIACION 6 

QFA QANTAS AIRLINES 2 

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 1 

RAM ROYAL AIR MAROC 2 

RJA ROYAL JORDANIAN 2 

Page 2
04/05/2012 12:23:58

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2011 (Current & Future)

JFK

SAA SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS 2 

SCX SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES, INC. 4 

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2 

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 6 

TAI TACA AIRLINES 2 

TAM TAM BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 4 

THY TURKISH AIRLINES, INC. 2 

UAE EMIRATES 4 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 37 

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 

USA US AIRWAYS 16 

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 6 

VRD VIRGIN AMERICA 19 

Page 3
#### Will H. CONLEY and Verline Conley v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 53174.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 19, 1973.

In re: Will H. Conley and Verline Conley applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Assumption. 270 So.2d 342.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET FINANCING ESTIMATES 

Today, the Treasury Department announced net borrowing of marketable 

debt for the July – September 2004 and October - December 2004 quarters. 

Quarter 

Estimated 

Borrowing 

($ billion) 

Estimated 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billion) 

Jul-Sep 2004 $89 $35 

Oct–Dec 2004 $122 $35 

Since 1997, the average absolute forecast error in net market borrowing for 

the current quarter is $10 billion, of which $1 billion is attributable to 

differences in the end-of-quarter cash balance. Similarly, the average 

absolute forecast error for the following quarter is $45 billion, of which $10 

billion is attributable to differences in the end-of-quarter cash balance. 

The following tables display and reconcile the variation between forecasted 

and actual net marketable borrowing in the April – June 2004 quarter. 

Quarter 

Estimated 

Borrowing 

($ billions) 

Actual 

Borrowing 

($ billions) 

Estimated 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billions) 

Actual 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billions) 

Apr - Jun 2004 $38 $31 $45 $45 

Categories 

Chg from 

May Estimate 

Receipts +$4 

Outlays +4 

Non-Marketable Activity (2) 

Additional financing details relating to Treasury’s Quarterly Refunding will 

be released at 9:00 A.M. on Wednesday, August 4.
S:\CHARTS\2Q-REPORT.11.doc July 26, 2013 (10:24 AM)

Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending

April 1 – June 30, 2013

Date Country Amount Type

U.S. 

Position Background

05/01/2013 Jamaica SDR 615.38 million 

($932.3 million)

EFF Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2013/pr13150.htm

05/15/2013 Cyprus SDR 891 million 

($1.33 billion)

EFF Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2013/pr13175.htm

05/15/2013 Samoa SDR 5.8 million 

($8.6 million)

RCF Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2013/pr13178.htm

06/07/2013 Tunisia SDR 1.146 billion 

($1.74 billion)

SBA Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2013/pr13202.htm

06/10/2013 Mali SDR 10 million 

($15.1 million)

RCF Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2013/pr13206.htm

06/24/2013 Colombia SDR 3.87 billion 

($5.84 billion)

FCL Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2013/pr13229.htm

06/24/2013 Republic of 

Mozambique

NCV PSI Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2013/pr13231.htm

06/28/2013 Uganda NCV PSI Support http://www.imf.org/external/

np/sec/pr/2013/pr13239.htm
-

2-