alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.2


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM


 


We have issued our report dated October 19, 2021, with respect to the
financial statement of m+ funds Trust, Series 1-22 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-258399, and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use
of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


 


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 19, 2021
#### Vincent C. VOLPE, Appellant, v. Margie VOLPE, Appellee.

No. 69-73.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 28, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 21, 1969.

Silver S. Squarcia, Miami, for appellant.

Byrd V. Duke, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, TT.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant husband, Vincent C. Volpe, appeals from a final decree of divorce for the wife, Margie Volpe.

He does not challenge the award of the divorce to the wife but argues that there was insufficient, competent, substantial evidence to support certain portions of the final decree; that the chancellor abused his discretion in making certain property awards and in requiring him to pay attorney’s fees and costs to the wife.

There was conflicting evidence in the record concerning certain monies which the parties paid to purchase a condominium apartment which was awarded to the wife *535in the divorce decree. The court found that the wife had a special equity in this condominium apartment as she had alleged in her pleadings. It granted her no alimony but required the husband to convey all right, title and interest in the condominium to the wife. We find competent, substantial evidence to support this finding and no reversible error in this ruling. See Hoke v. Hoke, Fla.App. 1967, 202 So.2d 118; and Latta v. Latta, Fla.App. 1960, 121 So.2d 42.

The record does not reflect that the chancellor abused his discretion in requiring the husband to pay $300 to the attorney for the wife and $80 in court costs. See Arrington v. Arrington, Fla.App. 1963, 150 So.2d 473; and Turney v. Turney, Fla.App.1963, 149 So.2d 83.

The final judgment of divorce is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

CON EDISON OF NEW YORK—Principal Executive Officer 

 

I, Eugene R. McGrath, the principal executive officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 of Consolidated Edison Company of NewYork, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 5, 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA SILVIA OPICO

- ALFARO,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 70761

Agency No. A213

- 081

- 892

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2020 * * Seattle, Washington

Before: M. SMITH and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, ** * District Judge.

Maria Silvia Opico

- Alfaro , a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order dismissing her appeal

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge of the United Stat es District Court for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

FEB 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

The BIA found that Opico

- Alfaro had waived her right to appeal and had not

contested the validity of that waiver.

This court l acks jurisdiction over the petition for review of the BIA’s

dismissal of Opico

- Alfaro’s appeal. Opico

- Alfaro waived her right to appeal in

removal proceedings before the immigration judge. She did not challenge the

validity of that waiver in her appeal b efore BIA. The waiver of the right to appeal

constitutes a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Brown v. Holder

, 763

F.3d 1141, 1146 (9th Cir. 2014) ; Barron v. Ashcroft

, 358 F.3d 674, 67 7 (9th Cir.

2004) ( holding that the plain text of 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) “specifically mandates

that the exhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite to our

jurisdiction”)

. A petitioner may challenge the validity of the waiver before the

BIA, In re Patino

, 23 I. & N. Dec. 74, 76 (BIA 2001), but t he failure to raise the

issue likewise amounts to a failure to exhaust administrative remedies

, Arsdi v.

Holder , 659 F.3d 925, 928

– 29 (9th Cir. 2011). Because Opico

- Alfaro waived her

right to appeal and failed to raise the validity of the waiver before th e BIA, she

failed to exhaust administrative remedies

, and we are without jurisdiction to hear

the matter.

The petition for review is DISMISSED

.
1 Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Ave, S.W. Renton, W ashington 98057 - 3356 May 14 , 2013 Mr. Jonathan Moritz Delta Engineering 13 DBRA Way New Castle, DE 19720 Dear Mr. Moritz: This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 25.251 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . We have entered your April 23, 2013 , exemption request on behalf of Delta Engineering into the public docket No. FAA - 20 13 - 0391 . However, the information you sent doesn’t comply

with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (cop y enclosed) , and so we are unable to process your request an y further. For us to consider your request, y ou must send us all of the following:  Each exemption must r eference a specific STC project which must include a description of the specific modification being made to the external configuration of the airplane and the specific airplane make and model.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to s upport your request. **What You Should Do** The FAA cannot grant a single exemption that would apply to all of your STC projects that modify the external configuration of the airplane. You must appl y for an exemption for each STC project , include a descript ion of the specific modification project , and specif y the airplane make and model to be considered for an exemption by the FAA. You can cancel this request and send us an application for each STC project. For each STC project requesting an exemption, you must describe the external modifications for that specific project, specify the airplane make and model, and the regulation(s) r equiring an exemption. You can also keep this appli cation open by limiting it to modifying a specific external configuration fo r an STC project and reference the airplane make and model for that STC project . If you decide to keep this application open, you must send us the required information within 30 day s. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires y ou to send y our petition for exemption at least 120 day s before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2 **If We Don’t Hear From You** If we don’t hear from yo u within 30 day s, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If y ou have any questions or require additional time, you may call 425 - 227 - 2793 . Sincerel y, Michael Menkin Technical Writer - Editor, Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service Enclosur e
Cite as 2016 Ark. 283



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. D -16 -174

STARK LIGON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

PETITIONER

V.

JEFF ER Y H. KEARNEY ARKANSAS BAR ID # 91249

RESPONDENT Opinion Delivered June 23, 2016

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL JUDGE

SPECIAL JUDGE APPOINTED

.

P ER C URIAM Stark Ligon, Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, has filed a complaint for disbarment against the respondent, Jeffery H. Kearney. Pursuant to section 13(A) of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court

Re gulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law, a special judge shall be appointed to preside over the disbarment proceedings. After hearing all evidence relevant to the alleged misconduct, the judge shall make findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of an appropriate sanction, and shall file them, along with a transcript and the record of the proceedings, with the clerk of the supreme court.Cite as 2016 Ark. 283

D- 16

- 174

2 On April 21, 2016, the Honorable Vicki Cook, Retired Circuit Judge, was appointed as special judge to hear this matter. Ligon v. Kearney , 2016 Ark. 179 (per curiam). Judge Cook has found it necessary to recuse from further proceedings in this matter. The court now appoints the Honorable David Goodson, Retired Circuit Judge, as special judge to hear this matter and to provide the court with findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of an appropriate sanction. Upon receipt of the special judge’s findings, we will render a decision in this matter.

It is so ordered.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2439 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on the amount individuals can deduct for certain State and local taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Ms. UNDERWOOD (for herself and Mr. CASTEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on the amount individuals can deduct for 

certain State and local taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SALT Fairness for 

5 Working Families Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR CER7 TAIN STATE AND LOCAL TAXES OF INDIVID8 UALS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b)(6)(B) of the Inter10 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2439 IH

1 ‘‘$10,000 ($5,000 in the case of a married individual filing 

2 a separate return)’’ and inserting ‘‘$15,000 (twice such 

3 amount in the case of a joint return)’’. 

4 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 164(b) of 

5 such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 

6 new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(7) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the case of 

8 any taxable year beginning after December 31, 

9 2021, the $15,000 amount in paragraph (6)(B) shall 

10 be increased by an amount equal to— 

11 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

12 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter13 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

14 year in which the taxable year begins, deter15 mined by substituting ‘calendar year 2020’ for 

16 ‘calendar year 2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii) 

17 thereof. 

18 If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sen19 tence is not a multiple of $100, such amount shall 

20 be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $100.’’. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

23 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2018

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/28 1/2 1/4 55.00 45.00 40.00 20.00 140.00 20.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 1/4 1/9 1/11 55.00 48.00 44.00 135.00 12.00

1/11 1/16 1/18 60.00 48.00 44.00 135.00 17.00

1/18 1/23 1/25 60.00 48.00 44.00 135.00 17.00

1/25 1/30 2/1 60.00 48.00 44.00 20.00 150.00 22.00

2/1 2/6 2/8 60.00 48.00 44.00 130.00 22.00

2/8 2/13 2/15 65.00 48.00 44.00 129.00 28.00

2/15 2/20 2/22 65.00 48.00 44.00 127.00 30.00

2/22 2/27 3/1 65.00 48.00 44.00 20.00 147.00 30.00

3/1 3/6 3/8 70.00 52.00 48.00 135.00 35.00

3/8 3/13 3/15 70.00 52.00 48.00 140.00 30.00

3/15 3/20 3/22 70.00 52.00 48.00 146.00 24.00

3/22 3/27 3/29 70.00 52.00 48.00 20.00 166.00 24.00

2126.00 1815.00 311.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

123-DAY CMB 8/29 9/1 40.00 -40.00

Matures 1/2/18

72-DAY BILL 2/12 2/13 50.00 0.00 50.00

Matures 4/26/18

72-DAY BILL 3/5 3/6 50.00 0.00 50.00

Matures 5/17/18

CMB Funds: 60.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

2-year note 12/21 12/26 1/2 26.00 0.00

5-year note 12/21 12/27 1/2 34.00 0.00

7-year note 12/21 12/28 1/2 28.00 0.00 79.95 8.05

3-year Note 1/4 1/9 1/16 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 1/4 1/10 1/16 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 1/4 1/11 1/16 12.00 0.00 41.34 14.66

10-year TIPS 1/11 1/18 1/31 13.00 0.00

2-year note 1/18 1/23 1/31 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 1/18 1/24 1/31 15.00 0.00

5-year note 1/18 1/24 1/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 1/18 1/25 1/31 28.00 0.00 115.27 0.73

3-year Note 2/7 2/12 2/15 26.00 2.00

10-year Note 2/7 2/12 2/15 24.00 1.00

30-year Bond 2/7 2/13 2/15 16.00 1.00 50.73 15.27

2-year FRN (r) 2/15 2/21 2/23 15.00 2.00 0.00 15.00

30-year TIPS 2/8 2/15 2/28 7.00 0.00

2-year note 2/16 2/20 2/28 28.00 2.00

5-year note 2/16 2/21 2/28 35.00 1.00

7-year note 2/16 2/22 2/28 29.00 1.00 76.16 22.84

3-year Note 3/8 3/12 3/15 28.00 2.00

10-year Note (r) 3/8 3/12 3/15 21.00 1.00

30-year Bond (r) 3/8 3/13 3/15 13.00 1.00 24.00 38.00

10-year TIPS (r) 3/15 3/22 3/30 11.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 3/22 3/28 3/30 15.00 0.00 0 26.00

528.00 387.4 140.55

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 512
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Gerald David YANKS, Relator, v. E. Wilson PURDY, as Sheriff of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-1334.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 10, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus denied.
LAKE COUNTY EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE

ZERO INCOME CERTIFICATION 

Form to be completed by Head of Household and signed by all adult household members if the 

household is claiming zero income.

Head of Household: Date: 

Applicant: Application Number: 

*Acknowledgement: By typing your initials or name below, you acknowledge and agree that this

represents your signature and you are attesting to all information being provided on this form.

1. I/ we hereby certify that I/ we do not individually receive income from any of the following

sources: 

a. Wages from employment (including commissions, tips, bonuses, fees, etc.);

b. Income from operation of a business;

c. Rental income from real or personal property;

d. Interest or dividends from assets;

e. Social Security payments, annuities, insurance policies, retirement funds, pensions, or death

benefits;

f. Unemployment or disability payments;

g. Public assistance payments;

h. Periodic allowances such as alimony, child support, or gifts received from persons not living

in my household;

i. Sales from self-employed resources (Avon, Mary Kay, Shaklee, etc.);

j. Child support or alimony;

k. Any other source not named above.

*Initials

2. I/we currently have no income of any kind and there is no imminent change expected in my

financial status or employment status during the next 12 months.

*Initials

(For Office Use Only)

IHCDA Compliance Form #27 Revised 1/1/11

Printed Name of Applicant/Tenant

Date

*Signature of Applicant/Tenant

*Signature of Applicant/Tenant Printed Name of Applicant/Tenant Date

Date

*Signature of Applicant/Tenant Printed Name of Applicant/Tenant

*Signature of Applicant/Tenant Printed Name of Applicant/Tenant Date