alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64832-64833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32327]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Farm Credit Administration Board

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming regular meeting 
of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATES AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
December 11, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board 
concludes its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 
883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESS: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited 
space available), and parts of this meeting will be closed to the 
public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, 
persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The 
matters to be considered at the meeting are:

OPEN SESSION

A. Approval of Minutes
B. Report
    --Farm Credit System Building Association Quarterly Report
C. New Business
    Regulation
    --BC Loan Discounting [12 CFR Part

[[Page 64833]]

614] (Direct Final)

* CLOSED SESSION

D. Report
    --OGC Litigation Report

    Note: * Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(10).

    Dated: December 5, 1997.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32327 Filed 12-5-97; 12:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-M
#### TROPICANA PRODUCTS, INC., and Royal-Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. George W. ROBERTSON, Jr., and the Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 44414.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Lorain County, Ohio

Recovery Plan 

State and Local Fiscal Recovery 

Funds

2021 Report
Lorain County 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 1

Lorain County

2021 Recovery Plan

Table of Contents

General Overview........................................................................................................................2

Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................2
Lorain County 2021 Recovery Plan Performance Report 2

GENERAL OVERVIEW

Executive Summary 

Lorain County will receive $60,181,428 in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds as a part of 

the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. Due to the unprecedented strains caused by the economic 

fallout from the pandemic crisis the County intends to use the funds to meet the local needs of our local 

communities. The County’s goals are to support the immediate pandemic response to decrease spread 

of the virus, replace lost public sector revenue to strengthen support for vital public services, support 

immediate economic stabilization for households, businesses & non-profit organizations and lay the 

groundwork for a strong and equitable recovery for our residents in response to the COVID-19 

emergency and its economic impacts.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                             CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share


                                                  Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                    2001               2000
                                                    ----               ----

Computation of share totals used in
  computing earnings per share:

Weighted average number
  of shares outstanding                           18,857,297        18,786,722

Basic average shares
  a-Outstanding                                   18,857,297        18,786,722

Incremental shares arising from
outstanding stock options                             43,282           128,167
                                                ------------      ------------

  b-Totals                                        18,900,579        18,914,889
                                                ============      ============

  c-Net Income Applicable to Common Stock       $  1,349,513      $  5,294,621
                                                ============      ============

Net income per share
  Basic - c/a                                   $       0.07      $       0.28
                                                ============      ============

Net income per share
  assuming full dilution c/b                    $       0.07      $       0.28
                                                ============      ============




                                      -18-
254 La. 762

#### Sam W. CHASE v. H. B. STEWART d/b/a Stewart Plumbing and Heating Company, et al.

No. 49945.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: H. B. Stewart d/b/a H. B. Stewart Plumbing and Heating Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 222 So.2d 311.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found by the Court of Appeals, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
#### Alfreda KING v. Allen S. SANCHEZ.

No. 5295.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1973.

Gilbert V. Andry, III, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Gordon K. Konrad, Gretna, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before REGAN, REDMANN and BOU-TALL, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

Defendant husband appealed from a 1971 judgment increasing child support payable to his divorced wife for their then 17-year-old daughter. Pending that appeal, La. Acts 1972, No. 98, amending C.C. art. 37, reduced the age of majority from 21 to 18.

We are advised that the husband thereafter by rule obtained a judgment terminating the “child support” to the wife for the now-major daughter and the wife appealed suspensively from that judgment. The first appeal was docketed for hearing but the parties briefed the second. Upon realizing that the judgment of termination was not in the record prepared for the first appeal, they moved to continue the first to be consolidated with the second appeal. We declined the continuance because, as the motion showed, the question whether child support (improperly increased or not) is collectible in a divorce proceeding for a major child is presented in both appeals and, in our view, is dispositive.

Plaintiff points out that a father’s obligation to support his “needy descendants” is not owed only during their minority, C.C. art. 229. However, we do not reach the question whether plaintiff’s daughter is a needy descendant entitled to support, since plaintiff no longer has the capacity to raise that question for the daughter.

*46Paternal authority, C.C. art. 216, and tutorship, art. 37 (including the natural tutorship which art. 157 provides for the parent awarded custody, and which results in authority over the “minor”, arts. 246 and 250), cease upon the child’s majority. Any obligation of support the father owes his major daughter cannot be satisfied by paying the mother, who is no longer empowered to act for her child.

An order for child support, in favor of a spouse awarded custody of a minor child, expires (as does the custody order itself) when the child becomes a major. The parties agree that, if majority terminates the child support, the question of quantum becomes moot.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot.
#### Eugene MATHEWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-444.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,089
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,609
<INVENTORY>                                     15,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,865
<PP&E>                                         715,965
<DEPRECIATION>                               (305,531)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 600,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,595
<BONDS>                                        116,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,244
<OTHER-SE>                                     306,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   600,207
<SALES>                                         88,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,619
<CGS>                                           79,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   273
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,038)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (638)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (638)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
| State                    | Allocation         |
|--------------------------|--------------------|
| Alabama                  | $356,382,822.00    |
| Alaska                   | $43,189,176.00     |
| Arizona                  | $226,731,767.00    |
| Arkansas                 | $216,225,138.00    |
| California               | $1,218,261,277.00  |
| Colorado                 | $265,396,436.00    |
| Connecticut              | $202,744,874.00    |
| Delaware                 | $90,583,517.00     |
| District of Columbia     | $0.00              |
| Florida                  | $1,416,425,123.00  |
| Georgia                  | $861,827,586.00    |
| Hawaii                   | $46,191,175.00     |
| Idaho                    | $107,940,808.00    |
| Illinois                 | $742,179,391.00    |
| Indiana                  | $432,551,280.00    |
| Iowa                     | $221,737,821.00    |
| Kansas                   | $167,352,563.00    |
| Kentucky                 | $324,203,207.00    |
| Louisiana                | $315,493,318.00    |
| Maine                    | $119,223,764.00    |
| Maryland                 | $528,963,161.00    |
| Massachusetts            | $385,056,772.00    |
| Michigan                 | $644,291,475.00    |
| Minnesota                | $376,932,399.00    |
| Mississippi              | $268,046,958.00    |
| Missouri                 | $450,143,657.00    |
| Montana                  | $86,377,829.00     |
| Nebraska                 | $111,189,720.00    |
| Nevada                   | $150,738,524.00    |
| New Hampshire            | $112,208,773.00    |
| New Jersey               | $578,121,375.00    |
| New Mexico               | $126,089,079.00    |
| New York                 | $774,248,894.00    |
| North Carolina           | $705,384,207.00    |
| North Dakota             | $53,174,975.00     |
| Ohio                     | $843,726,939.00    |
| Oklahoma                 | $238,432,979.00    |
| Oregon                   | $248,351,580.00    |
| Pennsylvania             | $983,008,128.00    |
| Rhode Island             | $58,146,731.00     |
| South Carolina           | $435,125,080.00    |
| South Dakota             | $65,246,504.00     |
| Tennessee                | $438,055,590.00    |
| Texas                    | $1,386,117,819.00  |
| Utah                     | $186,820,600.00    |
| Vermont                  | $58,788,245.00     |
| Virginia                 | $633,753,549.00    |
| Washington               | $442,823,871.00    |
| West Virginia            | $162,490,814.00    |
| Wisconsin                | $411,577,691.00    |
| Wyoming                  | $47,790,929.00     |
| American Samoa           | $5,071,819.00      |
| Guam                     | $17,599,913.00     |
| Northern Mariana Islands | $5,447,789.00      |
| Puerto Rico              | $124,849,699.00    |
| Virgin Islands           | $11,164,890.00     |
| TOTAL                    | $19,530,000,000.00 |
#### Joseph B. MIDDLETON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-618.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

Joesph B. Middleton, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of *64the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 17, 2006, 9 a.m. EST 

CONTACT Brookly McLaughlin (202) 622-2920 

 

TREASURY INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL DATA FOR FEBRUARY 

Treasury International Capital (TIC) data for February are released today and posted on the U.S. 

Treasury web site (www.treas.gov/tic). The next release date, which will report on data for March,

is scheduled for May 15, 2006. 

Net foreign purchases of long-term securities were $86.9 billion. 

• Net foreign purchases of long-term domestic securities were $99.5 billion, $15.7 billion of 

which were net purchases by foreign official institutions and $83.8 billion of which were net 

purchases by private foreign investors. 

• U.S. residents purchased a net $12.6 billion in foreign issued securities. 

Foreigners’ Transactions in Long-Term Securities with U.S. Residents 

(Billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted)

12 Months Through

2004 2005 Feb-05 Feb-06 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 

1 Gross Purchases of Domestic Securities 15178.9 16914.7 15526.2 17173.2 1427.6 1202.7 1444.2 1457.1

2 Gross Sales of Domestic Securities 14262.4 15871.6 14588.5 16132.7 1322.7 1128.1 1362.5 1357.6

3 Domestic Securities Purchased, net (line 1 less line 2) /1 916.5 1043.1 937.7 1040.4 104.9 74.6 81.7 99.5

4 Private, net /2 680.9 932.0 721.6 924.5 99.3 63.9 59.4 83.8

5 Treasury Bonds & Notes, net 150.9 304.9 182.7 252.6 51.0 12.7 -3.8 10.8

6 Gov't Agency Bonds, net 205.7 191.9 197.1 210.1 8.6 8.9 19.4 28.7

7 Corporate Bonds, net 298.0 356.8 315.0 360.3 34.9 32.8 23.5 27.2

8 Equities, net 26.2 78.3 26.8 101.5 4.8 9.6 20.3 17.1

9 Official, net 235.6 111.1 216.1 115.9 5.6 10.7 22.3 15.7

10 Treasury Bonds & Notes, net 201.1 59.3 175.3 59.6 3.5 5.6 8.0 11.2

11 Gov't Agency Bonds, net 20.8 32.6 24.3 34.1 0.4 2.7 11.1 1.9

12 Corporate Bonds, net 11.5 18.4 14.2 20.7 1.7 2.4 2.3 3.3

13 Equities, net 2.2 0.8 2.3 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.9 -0.7

14 Gross Purchases of Foreign Securities 3123.1 3640.7 3095.9 3903.8 337.4 338.9 374.4 403.7

15 Gross Sales of Foreign Securities 3276.0 3794.5 3242.8 4061.3 353.8 359.7 387.0 416.3

16 Foreign Securities Purchased, net (line 14 less line 15) /3 -152.8 -153.8 -146.8 -157.5 -16.4 -20.8 -12.6 -12.6

17 Foreign Bonds Purchased, net -67.9 -27.1 -57.5 -28.3 0.8 -4.1 -2.3 -0.3

18 Foreign Equities Purchased, net -85.0 -126.7 -89.3 -129.2 -17.2 -16.7 -10.4 -12.4

19 Net Long-Term Flows (line 3 plus line 16) 763.6 889.2 790.9 882.9 88.5 53.8 69.1 86.9

/1 Net foreign purchases of U.S. securities (+)

/2 Includes International and Regional Organizations

/3 Net U.S. acquisitions of foreign securities (-)
Exhibit 35.3

SUBSERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

NAVIENT
SOLUTIONS, INC.

12061 Bluemont Way

Reston, VA 20190

Pursuant to Section 13.03 of the Omnibus Subservicing Agreement dated March 23,2009 among Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.
(Subservicer), Navient Solutions, Inc. as the master servicer and administrator (the Servicing Agreement), the undersigned certifies that (a) a review of the Subservicers activities during the period from
January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision; and (b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its
obligation under the Servicing Agreement, in all material respects, during such period.

GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jill M. Leitl      
|Jill M. Leitl          
|Chief Servicing Officer
|                       
|February 9, 2015       



|
|
|

|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC.       
|2401 INTERNATIONAL LANE  |  MADISON, WI 53704-3192
|PHONE: 608.246.1800  |  WEB: MYGREATLAKES.ORG
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Michael Mathews, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Aspen Group, Inc.; and



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: August 25, 2017



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|/s/ Michael Mathews                                                  
|Michael Mathews
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
§ 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of MEMS USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
        Form
        10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James A. Latty and
        Richard W. York, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
        Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
        August 14 ,
        2006
 /s/ 
James
                A.
                LattyJames
                  A. Latty,
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
 Date:
        August 14 ,
        2006
 /s/ Richard
                W. YorkRichard
                  W. York,
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), we,
Robert S. Benou Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company and Marc Benou, the Chief Operating Officer, President
and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  The information contained n the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Dated: March 11, 2005                        /s/ Robert Benou
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name: Robert Benou
                                             Title: Chairman, Chief Executive
                                             Officer, Chief Financial Officer
                                             and Treasurer


Dated: March 11, 2005                        /s/ Marc Benou
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name: Marc Benou
                                             Title: Chief Operating Officer,
                                             President and Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.


                                       15
---

Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Bridgeport Ventures Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated August 31, 2009
except for Note 9 which is as at September 25, 2009 and Note 10 which is as at
April 5, 2010, with respect to the balance sheets of Bridgeport Ventures Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Enterprise) as at April 30, 2009 and 2008 and the
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders equity, and cash
flows for the year ended April 30, 2009 and for the period from the date of
incorporation (May 10, 2007) to April 30, 2008, included herein by reference and
to the reference to our firm under the heading Auditors in the
Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F
Registration Statement.

/s/ McGovern, Hurley, Cunningham, LLP

Chartered Accountants Licensed Public Accountants

Toronto, Canada

June 16, 2010

---