alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


BLOCKCHAIN MOON ACQUISITION CORP.


4651 Salisbury Road, Suite 400


Jacksonville, FL 32256


 


October 18, 2021


 


Jupiter Sponsor, LLC


4651 Salisbury Road, Suite 400


Jacksonville, FL 32256


 


Re: Administrative Services Agreement


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing
on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”)
for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Blockchain Moon Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)
and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination and (ii) the Company’s
liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), Jupiter Sponsor LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services
as may be required by the Company from time to time, at 4651 Salisbury Road, Suite 400, Jacksonville FL, 32256.. In exchange therefore,
the Company shall pay Jupiter Sponsor LLC $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination
Date. Jupiter Sponsor LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that
may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the
IPO and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


This agreement may not be amended, modified or
waived as to any particular provision, except by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto.


 


No party hereto may assign this agreement or any
rights, interests or contracted obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other party. Any purported assignment
in violation of this paragraph shall be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer or assign any interest or title to the
purported assignee.


 


This agreement shall be governed by, construed
in accordance with, and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to its choice of law principles.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	BLOCKCHAIN MOON ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/ Enzo A. Villani
	 	 	Name:	Enzo A. Villani
	 	 	Title:	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


	JUPITER SPONSOR LLC	 
	 	 
	By:	  /s/ Enzo A. Villani	 
	 	Name:	Enzo A. Villani	 
	 	Title:	Managing Member	 


 


[Signature page to Administrative Services
Agreement]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 0441

_____________________________
R ANDY J ACKSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Christopher N. Patterson , Judge

. August 14, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Randy Jackson, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
print | close

Recycling Keeps Railroad Ties Off The Landfill Track

Waste Age

WORLD WASTES STAFF 

Fri, 1995-09-01 12:00 

St. Louis - The railroads have been working hard to transport waste across the country. But what 

happens to the waste generated by the railroads?

Currently, 13 million wooden crossties are removed from railroad service each year. More than half are 

reused in landscaping, fencing, construction, retaining walls and as fuel for utilities and other plants; the 

rest are landfilled.

To conserve landfill space while turning a profit, several companies have developed innovative uses for 

the crossties. For example, Wood Waste Energy Inc. (WWE), St. Louis, in cooperation with Norfolk 

Southern Railroad, Richmond, Va., and Chicago and Northwestern Railroad, grinds the ties to sell as fuel 

to an electric utility near St. Louis.

One advantage to burning cross-ties is their low moisture content. In addition, because the crossties are 

creosote-treated, the chips reportedly allow the boiler fire to burn at a higher temperature than for 

untreated wood chips. For example, the treated wood fire reportedly generates power of approximately 

7,000 Btu, compared to 4,000 to 6,000 Btu for untreated wood. Further, the treated wood chips 

reportedly leave behind less residue compared to untreated chips.

In Provo, Utah, another company is disassembling and reusing a 100-year old, 12-mile-long wooden 

railroad trestle submerged in the Great Salt Lake. "The wood is chock full of salt, which has essentially 

preserved [it]," said John Cannon, president of Trestlewood. The wooden trestles, composed of Douglas 

fir and redwood timbers, have been sold for use as pilings, telephone poles, retaining walls, house logs, 

siding, architectural elements and crib blocks for underground coal mines.

Source URL: http://waste360.com/mag/waste_recycling_keeps_railroad

Recycling Keeps Railroad Ties Off The Landfill Track Page 1 of 1

http://waste360.com/print/mag/waste_recycling_keeps_railroad 8/8/2013
### Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = JFK Season = S Holder = 0001(Exclude) Status Date = 01/01/2011 (Current & Future) 04/05/2012 12:23:58



### Query Parameters:

### 04/05/2012 12:23:58

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Holders) Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded JFK Season = SUMMER PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2011 (Current & Future)

JFK

189 AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 2 AAR ASIANA AIRLINES 2 ABX ABX AIR 2 AEA AIR EUROPA 2 AEW AEROSVIT AIRLINES 2 AFL AEROFLOT 10 AFR AIR FRANCE 6 AIC AIR INDIA 6 AJM AIR JAMAICA 7 AMX AEROMEXICO 2 ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 2 AUA AUSTRIAN 3 AVA AVIANCA 4 AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 6 AZA ALITALIA 18 BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 2 BER AIR BERLIN 5 BWA CARIBBEAN AIRLINES 2 CAO AIR CHINA CARGO 2 CAY CAYMAN AIRWAYS 2 CCA AIR CHINA 1 CES CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 1 CKS KALITTA FLYING SERVICES (AMERICAN INT'L 8 COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 9 CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 2 CSA CZECH AIRLINES 408 DAL DELTA AIR LINES 1 DHL DHL 8 DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 1 EIA EVERGREEN 6 EIN AER LINGUS 4 ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 2 ETD ETIHAD 3 FDX FED EX 2 FIN FINNAIR 4 IBE IBERIA AIRWAYS 2 ICE ICELANDAIR 2 JAI JET AIRWAYS 3 JAL JAPAN AIR LINES 348 JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 1 KAC KUWAIT AIRWAYS 3 KAL KOREAN AIR 4 KLM KLM ROYAL DUTCH 6 LAN LAN AIRLINES 2 LNE LAN ECUADOR 2 MSR EGYPT AIR 6 MXA MEXICANA DE AVIACION 2 QFA QANTAS AIRLINES 1 QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 2 RAM ROYAL AIR MAROC 2 RJA ROYAL JORDANIAN

Page 2

### 04/05/2012 12:23:58

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Holders) Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded JFK Season = SUMMER PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2011 (Current & Future)

JFK

2 SAA SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS 4 SCX SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES, INC. 2 SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 6 SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2 TAI TACA AIRLINES 4 TAM TAM BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 2 THY TURKISH AIRLINES, INC. 4 UAE EMIRATES 37 UAL UNITED AIRLINES 1 UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 16 USA US AIRWAYS 6 VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 19 VRD VIRGIN AMERICA

Page 3
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

March 10-11, 2009

US Environmental Protection Agency Conference Center

One Potomac Yard, 2777 S. Crystal Drive

Arlington, Virginia 22202



### AGENDA

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

(9:00 A.M. Press Conference

- Release of Twelfth Report of the Good

Neighbor Environmental Board: “Innovative and Practical Approaches to

Solving Border Environmental Problems”)

9:30 A.M. Registration

10:00 Meeting Begins

Call to Order – Paul Ganster, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

Board Member Self Introductions

10:10 Welcoming Remarks

Rafael DeLeon, Director

Office of Cooperative En vironmental Management

US Environmental Protection Agency

10:15 Opening Remarks and General Discussion

Nancy Sutley, Chair

Council on Environmental Quality

11:00 Break11:15 Update on Activities at the Border Environment Cooperation

Commission and the North American Development Bank

Maria-Elena Giner, Deputy General Manager

Border Environment Cooperation Commission

12:00 P.M. Overview of Current Activities Under the

US-Mexico Border 2012 Program

Lisa Almodovar, Mexico Border Team Leader

Office of International Affairs

US Environmental Protection Agency

Jose Garcia, US – Mexico Border Program Specialist

US Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region IX

12:45 Lunch

2:00 Priorities from the 2008 Border Governors Conference

Stephen Niemeyer, Policy Analyst

Intergovernmental Relati ons Division/Border Affairs

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

2:45 General Discussion of the Good Neighbor Environmental

Board’s 13 th Report

Paul Ganster, Chair

Board Members

3:30 Break

3:45 General Discussion of the Good Neighbor Environmental

Board’s 13 th Report (Continued)

5:00 Public Comments

5:30 Adjourn for the DayWednesday, March 11, 2009

Business Meeting and Strategic Planning Session

8:00 A.M. Registration

8:30 Business Meeting

- Approval of Minutes from Last Meeting

- Update on Planning for June 10 – 11, 2009 Meeting

- Discussion of Opti ons for Fall Meeting

9:15 General Discussion of the Good Neighbor Environmental

Board’s 13 th Report (Continued)

10:30 Break

10:45 General Discussion of the Good Neighbor Environmental

Board’s 13 th Report (Continued)

12:30 P.M. Public Comments

1:00 Lunch

2:00 Board Member Report-Outs

3:00 Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31980]



[[Page 64584]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project Nos. 1933-011 & 2198-007]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Availability of 
Final Environmental Assessment

December 2, 1997.
    A final environmental assessment (EA) is available for public 
review. The final EA analyzes the environmental impacts of an 
application by Southern California Edison Company (licensee) to 
relocate project facilities. The licensee proposes constructing a new 
penstock to replace part of the existing flowline for the Santa Ana 
River (SAR) 1 and 2 Hydroelectric Project No. 1933-011 and all of the 
flowline for the SAR 3 Hydroelectric Project No. 2198-007. The licensee 
proposes to construct a new powerhouse to replace both the SAR 2 and 
SAR 3 powerhouses. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is building a new 
flood control dam in the Santa Ana River Canyon below the SAR 1 and 2 
Project. The Seven Oaks Dam will inundate and destroy the SAR 2 
powerhouse and the SAR 3 flowline rendering both projects inoperable. 
The licensee's proposed construction would allow it to continue to 
operate the projects. Both projects are on the Santa Ana River and its 
tributaries in San Bernardino County, California.
    The final EA finds that the application to relocate project 
facilities would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment. The final EA was 
written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission in cooperation with the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture--Forest Service, San Bernardino National Forest, Big Bear 
Ranger District. Copies of the final EA can be obtained by calling the 
Commission's Public Reference room at (202) 208-1371.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31980 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
U.S. TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2ND QUARTER 2002

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW FED NON

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY ROLLOVER

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4 WEEK AND 03/28 04/01 04/04 19.00 11.00 11.00 46.3 -5.26 0.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 04/04 04/08 04/11 14.00 10.00 10.00 45.6 -11.63 0.00

04/11 04/15 04/18 14.00 10.00 10.00 43.1 -9.13 0.00

04/18 04/22 04/25 9.00 11.00 11.00 45.9 -14.90 0.00

04/25 04/29 05/02 16.00 13.00 13.00 47.4 -5.39 0.00

05/02 05/06 05/09 16.00 14.00 14.00 44.9 -0.92 0.00

05/09 05/13 05/16 20.00 15.00 15.00 46.0 4.00 0.00

05/16 05/20 05/23 22.00 15.00 15.00 41.0 11.00 0.00

05/23 05/27 05/30 22.00 16.00 16.00 47.0 7.00 0.00

05/28 06/03 06/06 20.00 16.00 16.00 46.0 6.00 0.00

06/06 06/10 06/13 18.00 16.00 16.00 49.0 1.00 0.00

06/13 06/17 06/20 14.00 16.00 16.00 50.0 -4.00 0.00

06/20 06/24 06/27 14.00 16.00 16.00 49.0 -3.00 0.00

179.00 601.24 -25.23 0.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

19-Day Bill 04/02 04/02 04/03 23.00 23.00 0.00

 Matures 4/22

12-Day Bill 04/02 04/03 04/04 23.00 23.00 0.00

 Matures 4/16

4-Day Bill 04/09 04/10 04/11 16.00 16.00 0.00

 Matures 4/15

BUYBACKS

04/17 04/18 04/22 -1.00

Maturity Range Feb '15 - Nov '18 and Apr '28 - Apr '32 (TIPS) Average Maturity 17.5 Years

04/22 04/23 04/25 -1.50

Maturity Range Feb '19 - Aug '22 Average maturity 18.5 Years

04/24 04/25 04/29 -1.50

Maturity Range Nov '22 - Nov '27 Average maturity 22.7 Years

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

2-Year Note 03/20 03/27 04/01 25.00 23.7 1.32 0.00

2-Year Note 04/17 04/24 04/30 25.00 24.2 0.78 0.00

5-Year Note 05/01 05/07 05/15 20.00 +4.00

10-Year Note (R) 05/01 05/08 05/15 35.00 11.00 -2.00 9.4 25.58 0.00

10-year TIPS 05/01 05/09 05/15 4.00 +4.00

2-Year Note 05/22 05/29 05/31 25.00 22.2 2.79 0.00

110.00 79.53 30.47 0.00

R=Reopening NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 5.24

A = Announced NET FED ROLLOVER: 0.00

MARKETABLE BORROWING: 5.24

BUYBACKS: -4.00

TOTAL NET BORROWING: 1.24

Treasury 

announced a Q2 

borrowing need of 

$1 billion on 

4/29/02.

A

A A A

A A A

A A A

A A A

A A A

A

A

A

A
# NMTC LICs 2011-2015 ACS

# NOTES

# High migration tracts
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Stuart Wilson and Frida Wilson v. Jeremiah Magaro, Individually and 

Chase Drywall Ltd.

Appellate case number: 01-12-00952-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-07300

Trial court: 157th District Court of Harris County

Appellants’ Motion for Leave to File Appellants’ Supplemental Brief is GRANTED. It is 

so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

Acting individually

Date: __June 25, 2013____________________
#### Henry A. KELLER, Jr., Appellant, v. Christal C. KELLER, Appellee.

No. 77-2204.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 14, 1978.

*855Levine, Reckson & Reed and Robert S. Geiger, Miami, for appellant.

• Koeppel, Stark & Newmark, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by appellant from a post mandate order denying appellant a credit for sums paid as lump sum alimony award pending appeal.

In a previous appeal this court modified the original alimony judgment by reducing the lump sum award to $25,000.00 and ordering periodic rehabilitative alimony be paid by the husband for sixty months. *Keller v. Keller,*348 So.2d 654 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Pending appeal by the husband, he was ordered by the trial judge to pay the sum of $1,300.00 per month as alimony until further order of the court. Pursuant to the court’s order the husband paid a total sum of $16,900.00.'

Following the issuance of this court’s mandate, the husband tendered the sum of $8,100.00 plus interest in the sum of $566.00 in full satisfaction of the lump sum portion of the award. The wife rejected the offer and moved the trial court to order the husband to comply with the final judgment as modified by this court requiring payment of $25,000.00 plus interest from July 15, 1976 in satisfaction of lump sum alimony portion of the final judgment. The trial court rejected the husband’s claim for credit for alimony paid pending appeal and ordered him to pay the entire sum of $25,000.00, plus interest. It is from that order that this appeal is taken.

The sole point presented for review is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant a credit for sums paid as alimony pending appeal, against the lump sum alimony award. We find error and reverse.

In *Frischkorn*v. *Frischkorn,*223 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969), we stated:

> “We agree that such amounts should properly be deducted from the final lump sum award once such award is determined. The purpose of the lump sum alimony is to discharge the husband from any further obligation to the wife after the date final judgment is entered; thus, payments made after this date, but pursuant to an order requiring temporary alimony pending appeal, goes toward discharge of that obligation. See *Morton v. Morton,*Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 472.”

Since there was a lump sum award here, the trial court should have credited against such sum the payment made by appellant pending the prior appeal. His failure to do so was reversible error. *Rankin v. Rankin,*275 So.2d 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). Therefore, for the reasons stated and upon the authorities cited we must reverse the order appealed.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2014

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 6/26 6/30 7/3 25.00 25.00 23.00 86.00 -13.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 7/3 7/7 7/10 35.00 25.00 23.00 81.00 2.00

7/10 7/14 7/17 35.00 25.00 23.00 81.00 2.00

7/17 7/21 7/24 35.00 26.00 24.00 25.00 100.00 10.00

7/24 7/28 7/31 40.00 27.00 24.00 70.00 21.00

7/31 8/4 8/7 40.00 28.00 25.00 80.00 13.00

8/7 8/11 8/14 40.00 28.00 25.00 102.00 -9.00

8/14 8/18 8/21 40.00 28.00 25.00 25.00 115.00 3.00

8/21 8/25 8/28 40.00 28.00 25.00 90.00 3.00

8/28 9/2 9/4 40.00 28.00 25.00 90.00 3.00

9/4 9/8 9/11 35.00 25.00 23.00 86.00 -3.00

9/11 9/15 9/18 30.00 25.00 23.00 25.00 110.00 -7.00

9/18 9/22 9/25 25.00 25.00 23.00 88.00 -15.00

1189.00 1179.00 10.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 7/3 7/8 7/15 27.00 -1.00

10-year Note ® 7/3 7/9 7/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 7/3 7/10 7/15 13.00 0.00 55.58 5.42

10-year TIPS 7/17 7/24 7/31 15.00 0.00

2-year note 7/24 7/29 7/31 29.00 -1.00

5-year note 7/24 7/30 7/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 7/24 7/30 7/31 29.00 0.00

2-year FRN 7/24 7/29 7/31 15.00 0.00 74.98 48.02

3-year Note 8/6 8/12 8/15 27.00 0.00

10-year Note 8/6 8/13 8/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 8/6 8/14 8/15 16.00 0.00 57.70 9.30

5-year TIPS ® 8/14 8/21 8/29 16.00 0.00

2-year FRN® 8/21 8/27 8/29 13.00 0.00 0.00 29.00

2-year note 8/21 8/26 9/2 29.00 0.00

5-year note 8/21 8/27 9/2 35.00 0.00

7-year note 8/21 8/28 9/2 29.00 0.00 75.17 17.83

3-year Note 9/4 9/9 9/15 27.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 9/4 9/10 9/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 9/4 9/11 9/15 13.00 0.00 32.00 29.00

2-year FRN® 9/18 9/24 9/26 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

10-year TIPS ® 9/11 9/18 9/30 13.00 0.00

2-year note 9/18 9/23 9/30 29.00 0.00

5-year note 9/18 9/24 9/30 35.00 0.00

7-year note 9/18 9/25 9/30 29.00 0.00 75.71 30.29

553.00 371.13 181.87

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 192
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1256 CAF 13-01035**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KIMBERLY E. REINHARDT, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIE T. HARDISON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ROBERT J. GALLAMORE, OSWEGO, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Richard V. Hunt, J.), entered May 24, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order sentenced respondent to 60 days in the Jefferson County Jail for failure to pay child support.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order confirming the determination of the Support Magistrate that he willfully violated an order of child support and sentencing him to a term of incarceration of 60 days. We reject the father’s contention that petitioner mother failed to meet her burden of presenting prima facie evidence of his willful violation. “[P]roof that [the father] has failed to pay support as ordered alone establishes [the mother’s] direct case of willful violation, shifting to [the father] the burden of going forward” ( Matter of Powers v Powers , 86 NY2d 63, 69). Contrary to the father’s further contention, he failed to meet his burden inasmuch as he failed to present competent medical evidence to support his testimony that mental health problems interfered with his ability to obtain gainful employment to meet his child support obligation ( see Matter of Yamonaco v Fey , 91 AD3d 1322, 1323, lv denied 19 NY3d 803), nor did he establish that he made reasonable efforts to obtain such employment ( see Matter of Christine L.M. v Wlodek K ., 45 AD3d 1452, 1452-1453).
The father failed to preserve for our review his contention that the Support Magistrate improperly assisted the mother with her testimony and was biased against him ( see Matter of Gina C. v Augusto C. , 116 AD3d 478, 479, lv denied 23 NY3d 905; Matter of Sheenagh O’R. v Sean F ., 50 AD3d 480, 482-483). Finally, we reject the father’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel inasmuch as he did not “ ‘demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations’ for counsel’s alleged shortcomings” ( People v Benevento , 91 NY2d 708, 712; see Matter of Elijah D. [Allison D.] , 74**-2- 1256 CAF 13-01035** 
AD3d 1846, 1847).

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32128]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. DA96-206-002]

The Empire District Electric Company; Notice of Filing

December 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 3, 1997, The Empire District Electric 
Company tendered for filing its compliance filing in the above-
referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before December 15, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32128 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```