alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Position

Proposed International Finance Corporation (IFC) Investment in 

PT PANCA AMARA UTAMA (PAU) 

(Indonesia)

January 30, 2014

The United States welcomes the potential development impacts of this proposed investment in an 

ammonia plant in Sulawesi, particularly the prospect of direct and indirect job creation and value 

addition to natural gas resources. The United States also appreciates the role of the IFC in 

providing long-term finance and catalyzing other lenders at a time of economic slowdown and 

foreign capital outflow in Indonesia. 

The United States places a very high value on the role of the IFC in raising the environmental 

and social standards of projects like this one. The EIA Addenda commissioned by the IFC 

provides analysis to bridge the gap between the locally required EIA and the IFC Performance 

Standards, and thereby demonstrates how the IFC can contribute to raising standards. The 

Addenda make clear, however, that significant additional efforts are needed – filling in baseline 

data and putting in place additional monitoring, mitigation and management across a range of 

environmental and social impacts.

As this additional work is carried out, the United States urges the IFC and project sponsors to 

pay due attention to impacts beyond the physical boundaries of the project site. This could 

include impacts extending to the Banggai Islands local marine protected area in the Peleng Strait, 

or the primary forest adjacent to the project site. 

The United States acknowledges that the terrestrial flora and fauna management plan to be 

implemented during site clearing will propose supplementary measures should the maleo bird (a 

red-listed endangered species) be encountered during that time. The United States would 

underline the importance of strong monitoring by the IFC of this aspect of the plan, because 

mitigation options decrease dramatically once clearing and construction have already occurred.

Compliance with environmental and social management plans throughout implementation will 

be critically important. The United States calls on the IFC and Government of Indonesia to play 

their respective roles in reviewing the semiannual compliance reports to be submitted by PAU 

and verifying compliance. 

A number of IFC requirements (e.g. water quality standards) are more stringent than the 

Indonesian ones. In addition, the Pollution Controls addendum cites two areas in which the 

project plans would exceed IFC limits (total nitrogen and temperature increase). Given the 

potential risks to marine life should these not be kept in check, the United States requests that the 

IFC verify that appropriate measures have been incorporated into the plans before construction 

begins. 

With these comments, the United States wishes to be recorded as supporting the project.
Exhibit
23.1








INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM CONSENT





We
consent to the use of this Shell Company Report on Form 20-F for Ossen
Innovation Co., Ltd. of our report dated July 7, 2010, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Ossen Innovation Co., Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008. We also consent to the reference to us under the Item "Statement
by Experts" in such Shell Company Report.








/s/Sherb
& Co., LLP


Certified
Public Accountants


New York,
NY


July 9,
2010
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32481]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

Environmental Impact Statement: Wapello and Mahaska Counties, 
Iowa

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
environmental impact statement will be prepared for a proposed highway 
project in Wapello and Mahaska Counties, Iowa.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Majzoub, Transportation Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 
105 6th Street, Ames, Iowa 50010, Telephone: (515) 233-7300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Iowa 
Department of Transportation, will prepare an environmental impact 
statement (EIS) on a proposal to improve U.S. Highway 63 (formerly Iowa 
137) in Wapello and Mahaska Counties. The proposed improvement would 
involve the construction of a four-lane bypass of the town of 
Eddyville.
    Improvements to the corridor are considered necessary to provide 
for the existing and projected traffic demand. Alternatives to be 
considered include (1) taking no action; (2) a near east bypass; (3) a 
far east bypass; and (4) a westerly bypass.
    Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will 
be sent to appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, and to 
private organizations and citizens who have previously expressed or are 
known to have interest in this proposal. A public information meeting 
will be held in Eddyville on December 17, 1997. In addition, a public 
hearing will be held after the draft EIS is made available. Public 
notice will be given of the time and place of the hearing. The draft 
EIS will be available for public and agency review and comment prior to 
the public hearing.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments 
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or 
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
directed to the FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program)

    Issued on: December 2, 1997.
Robert L. Lee,
Division Administrator, Ames, Iowa.
[FR Doc. 97-32481 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
```
##### 



Exhibit 11 CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Earnings Per Share
(in thousands, except per share data) Three months ended March 31,2004
    
    
    2003(Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)Computation of share totals used in
computing earnings per share:Basic weighted average number of
shares outstanding
    
    
    18,834
    
    
    
    18,716Incremental shares arising from
outstanding stock options
    
    
    119
    
    
    
    10Total weighted average number of
diluted shares outstanding
    
    
    18,953
    
    
    
    18,726Net income
    
    
    4,239
    
    
    
    2,832Earnings for common stock
    
    $
    4,234
    
    
    $
    2,827Earnings per share:Basic
    
    
    0.22
    
    
    
    0.15Diluted
    
    
    0.22
    
    
    
    0.15
World Bank Inspection Panel Investigation and Report

Land Management and Administration Project (LMAP), Cambodia

March 9, 2011

U.S. Position

The United States is deeply concerned about the denial of the Boeung Kak Lake (BKL) 

residents’ land claims and their forced eviction from the BKL area in Phnom Penh. The United 

States appreciates the Inspection Panel’s thorough investigation into these events and concurs

with the findings of serious violations of Bank policies on project appraisal, supervision and 

resettlement. The United States welcomes Management’s belated yet proactive response to the 

evictions, and calls on Management to continue and strengthen efforts to assist those evicted, 

using all available options and influence to achieve this end. This cannot be business as usual.

This case shows starkly that land titling must be accompanied by due process in resolving 

conflicts and that a fair and transparent system must have the strong backing of all levels of 

government. Both aspects were integral to the success of this project. However, as the 

Inspection Panel found, the emphasis in this case appears to have been on producing land titles

without adequate protection for households with disputed or unclear land claims. 

The United States agrees with the Panel that the failings of this project contributed in part to the 

harm suffered by the BKL area residents. The residents were denied access to the process of 

adjudication of their property claims, and they were displaced in violation of the agreed policies 

for involuntary resettlement. The critical issue of adjudicating private claims on land claimed by 

the state was not effectively managed by the Bank. Regrettably, these failures and the human 

tragedy that has unfolded may overshadow the many positive achievements of the project.

The lessons from this and other problematic land management/titling projects should be clear: 

the need for better risk assessment and mitigation measures, multiple sources of information, 

stronger results framework and monitoring and evaluation systems, clear understandings of 

responsibilities and commitments to the requirements of Bank policies by all parties, and close 

supervision. These lessons must be incorporated into projects under preparation and, wherever 

possible, applied to ongoing operations. Therefore, the United States requests Management to 

describe the steps they are taking in this regard so we can avoid a repeat of the mistakes in this 

case.
EXHIBIT 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DE ACQUISITION 4, INC., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periods ending February 28, 2011 and 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Ruth Shepley
Ruth Shepley, President
May 17, 2011
Jonathan Gruber

Elite Air Productions

2416 Fields South Dr. Unit 202

Champaign, IL 61822

April 11th, 2015

Docket Operations, M­30

U.S. Department of Transportation

Room W12­140, West Building Ground Floor

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, DC 20590­0001

Application

to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. 13134

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–3088

Dear Sir or Madam:

By letter from the FAA dated October 8, 2015, an exemption was granted to Jonathan Gruber

for relief under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 13134

Regulatory Docket No. FAA­2015­3088.

Jonathan Gruber and Elite Air Productions requests that the exemption granted be amended to

include the following:

● The addition of closed set filming authorization for Movie and Television production.

○ Attached you will find the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual

(MPTOM)

● DJI X5 and X5R camera system User Manuals

○ X5/X5R Specs, User Manual

● Notice of Revision to Elite Air Productions Flight Operations Manual
The findings, rationale, and conclusions contained in the FAA’s Exemption No. 13134 apply

without modification to this application to include the additional Inspire 1 cameras in Exemption

No.13134. Revision to the Elite Air Productions Flight Operations Manual does not constitute a

change in operations affecting this exemption. The new revision is to include editorial revisions.

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional

information that is required.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Gruber
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 233 (Thursday, December 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64215-64216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4281-000]


NRG Power Marketing, Inc., Notice of Issuance of Order

November 28, 1997.
    NRG Power Marketing Inc. (NRG Power), an affiliate of Northern 
States Power Company, filed an application for authorization to sell 
electric energy and capacity at market-based rates. NRG Power also 
requested certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, NRG Power 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 
34 of all future issuances and assumptions of liabilities by NRG Power. 
On November 12, 1997, the Commission issued an Order Accepting For 
Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above-docketed 
proceeding.
    The Commission's November 12, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (C) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
NRG Power should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, NRG Power is hereby authorized, pursuant 
to section 204 of the FPA, to issue securities and assume obligations 
and liabilities as guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issued or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
NRG Power, compatible with the public interest, and reasonably 
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of NRG 
Power's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is December 12, 1997.

[[Page 64216]]

    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31762 Filed 12-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
December 6 , 2012

Mr. Denny Mantello Director of Operations Evergreen Helicopters of Alaska, Inc.

3850 Three Mile Lane McMinnville, OR 97128

Dear Mr. Mantello:

We regret to inform you that, based on similar petitions we have received, we may have to deny your petition for exemption. This letter explains why we may deny your petition and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We May Deny Your Petition

On November 5, 2012, you sent us a letter in which you requested an exemption from Operation Specification B050

- 1 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). We have added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA

- 2012

- 1201).

In your petition, you state that you would like to be allowed to conduct fixed wing medical

evacuation for United States civilian and DoD contracted personnel from various locations

with in Iraq to international hospital facilities.

It is important for you to know that the FAA has issued denials of exemption in circumstances similar to those presented in your petition. An example of th is type of denial , Exemption

No

. 10523

, is enclosed for your review. As noted in th is denial, the FAA found that the petitioner failed to provide needed safety and security information regarding planned flight operations in Iraq.

Because the previous den ial of exemption dealt with circumstances very similar to those presented in your petition, there is little reason to believe that we would grant your petition for exemption.

What You Should Do

• Before we commit agency resources to process and analyze your exemption request, we suggest that you review the enclosed denials of exemption.2

• If, after that review, you still want the agency to process your petition, you must tell us how the facts and circumstances of your particular situation are significantly dif ferent from the previous denials of exemption.

• Send the information about your particular situation to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open for that period.

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 3 0 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further.

If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677

.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2416 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2416

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the causation element 
       in the Federal hate crime statute, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

  Mr. Lieu (for himself, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Ruiz, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. 
 Takano, Ms. Escobar, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mrs. Hayes, Ms. Chu, Mr. 
Castro of Texas, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Horsford, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Ms. 
Bass, Mrs. Demings, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Neguse, Ms. Williams 
  of Georgia, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Meng, Mr. Correa, Mr. Panetta, Ms. 
 Velazquez, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, and 
 Ms. Matsui) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the causation element 
       in the Federal hate crime statute, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Hate Crimes Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION AS TO CAUSATION ELEMENT IN HATE CRIMES.

    Section 249(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph 
        (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``because of'' and inserting 
                ``if''; and
                    (B) by inserting after ``origin of any person'' the 
                following: ``was a contributory motivating factor for 
                causing or attempting to cause such injury''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(A), in the matter preceding clause 
        (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``because of'' and inserting 
                ``if''; and
                    (B) by inserting after ``disability of any person'' 
                the following: ``was a contributory motivating factor 
                for causing or attempting to cause such injury''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15    August 7, 2009   Northeast Utilities 107 Selden Street Berlin, Connecticut 06037  We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, and 2008, as indicated in our report dated August 7, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-141425 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-63144, 333-121364, and 333-142724 on Forms S-8.  We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.   /s/Deloitte & Touche LLPDeloitte & Touche LLP  Hartford
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32101]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 64349]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Board of Directors Meeting

TIME: 9:00 a.m.-12:00 noon.
PLACE: ADF Headquarters.
DATE: Wednesday, 10 December 1997.
STATUS: Open.

Agenda

Wednesday, 10 December 1997

9:00 a.m. Chairman's Report
10:00 a.m. President's Report
11:30 a.m. Executive Session (Closed)
12:00 noon Adjournment

    If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to Ms. 
Janis McCollim, Executive Assistant to the President, who can be 
reached at (202) 673-3916.
William R. Ford,
President.
[FR Doc. 97-32101 Filed 12-3-97; 3:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
Exhibit 11.1 CPI Corp.
Computation of Per Common Share Earnings (Loss) - Diluted(Unaudited) thousands,
      except share and per share data
    12
      Weeks EndedApril
      30, 
      2005
    
    May
      1,
      2004Diluted:Net
      loss applicable to common shares:From
      continuing operations
    $
    (2,058
    )
    $
    (7,649
    )From
      discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    (1,149
    )Net
      loss
    $
    (2,058
    )
    $
    (8,798
    )Shares:Weighted
      average number of common sharesoutstanding
    
    18,449,151
    
    
    18,366,028Shares
      issuable under employee stock plans -weighted
      average
    
    
    *
    
    
    **Diluted
      effect of exercise of certain stock options
    
    
    *
    
    
    **Less:
      Treasury stock - weighted average
    
    (10,639,543
    )
    
    (10,265,456
    )Weighted
      average number of common and commonequivalent
      shares outstanding
    
    7,809,608
    
    
    8,100,572Net loss
      per common and common equivalent shares:From
      continuing operations
    $
    (0.26
    )
    $
    (0.95
    )From
      discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    (0.14
    )Net
      loss
    $
    (0.26
    )
    $
    (1.09
    )  *
The
effect of stock options in the amount of 9,178 shares and 17,003 shares issuable under
employee stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.  **
The
effect of stock options in the amount of 61,227 shares and 17,449 shares issuable under
employee stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.