alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.12





Agreement on behalf of equity holders




Party A:  Jinlin Guo




Address: Xixiang JiaHua Park E-16 Bao An District Shenzhen Guangdong




ID number: 43292819700811001X




Party B: Yujin Zhou




Address: 7th Lane No.5 ShiGen SanCun GuiCheng St. Nanhai District Foshan Guangdong




ID number: 440622194512272829




After friendly consultation, the two sides reached the following consensus:




1 Commissioned content:




Party B shall on behalf of Party A to hold the 830,000 shares of AIVtech International Group Co., Ltd, and on behalf of Party A to exercise the relevant rights of shareholders. Party B agrees to entrust voluntarily.




2 Delegated authority:




Party B should exercise relevant rights of shareholders in his/her own name, be named on the register of shareholders, take part in the company activities, collect dividends or bonus on behalf of Party A, attend the shareholders meeting and vote.




3 Rights and obligations:




Party A as the actual investors, has the right to practice and get the appropriate return on investment , Party B does not enjoy the right to dispose of any gain formed by the investment .




In the commissioning period, Party A has the right to transfer the relevant shares to himself or to the third person appointed by himself. Party B shall unconditionally agree. In the commissioning period, Party A shall bear the related costs, taxes and stockholder registration fee which generated from the activity of Party B on behalf of Party A.




Party A as the actual stock owner, has the right to supervise and redress fiduciary improper Behavior of Party B, and request Party B to compensate for the losses caused by improper Behavior.




Settlement of disputes




When the disputes happen during the performance of this Agreement, Party A and Party B should have a consultation with each other first, if still can not settle the disputes, then should prosecute through the People's Court of Shenzhen City.









Others




1.           This Agreement in duplicate, one belongs to Party A, the other belongs  to Party B, this two agreements have the same legal effect.




2.           This Agreement become effective since the day that both Party signed the Agreement.




Signature:




/s/ Jinlin Guo




/s/ Yujin Zhou




2010-5-5
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1921 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1921

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
 Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN RESTORATION PROGRAM 
              REAUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Review of Comprehensive Management Plan.--Section 121 of the 
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (5), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) ensure that the comprehensive conservation and 
        management plan approved for the Basin under section 320 is 
        reviewed and revised in accordance with section 320 not less 
        often than once every 5 years, beginning on the date of 
        enactment of this paragraph.''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``recommended by a 
        management conference convened for the Basin under section 
        320'' and inserting ``identified in the comprehensive 
        conservation and management plan approved for the Basin under 
        section 320''.
    (b) Definitions.--Section 121(e)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273(e)(1)) is amended by striking ``, a 5,000 
square mile''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 121(f) of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2001 through 2012 and 
        the amount appropriated for fiscal year 2009 for each of fiscal 
        years 2013 through 2017'' and inserting ``2022 through 2026''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Administrative expenses.--The Administrator may use 
        for administrative expenses not more than 5 percent of the 
        amounts appropriated to carry out this section.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1921

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
 Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program, and for other purposes.
```
#### ROBERTS REALTY OF the BAHAMAS, LTD., a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. MILLER & SOLOMON (BAHAMAS), LTD., a foreign corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 69-1082, 70-132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 21, 1970.

See also Fla.App., 234 So.2d 417.

Paul & Thomson, Miami, and Joseph Z. Fleming, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Mark Casper, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We have consolidated two interlocutory appeals by Roberts Realty of the Bahamas, Ltd., a foreign corporation that was the defendant in the trial court.

The interlocutory appeals are from orders which denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss and its motion for reconsideration.

The essence of the defendant’s argument for reversal is that the trial court was without jurisdiction of the subject matter of the suit.

We have reviewed the record and briefs and find that the trial court correctly denied both the motion to dismiss and its *417motion for reconsideration. The other points argued appear to be without sufficient merit to warrant reversal.

See § 682.02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Pacific Mills v. Hillman Garment, Fla., 1956, 87 So.2d 599; Chapter 178, The Arbitration Clauses (Protocol) Act, § 2, Bahama Islands Statute Law, Revised Edition, 1965.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Computer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “PeriodicReport”), I, Dennis Conroy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does herebycertify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

1.                                       thePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78mor 78o(d)); and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 14, 2008 |   | /s/    DENNIS CONROY          |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Dennis  Conroy*Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Computer Horizons Corp. and will be retained by Computer HorizonsCorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of this Period Report or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

----
#### Raymond W. HILLYARD, Appellant, v. Elisabeth P. HILLYARD, Appellee.

No. 73-6.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Betty GRIFFIN, as legal guardian of Curtis Garrison, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY and American Home Assurance Company, Appellees.

No. 73-273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
波士顿市房租救济基金

当前收入自我证明(过去60天)

如果前两个月您有无法通过文件(如工资单)核实的雇佣收入,请填写此表(例如:个体经营、现金工资、来自

倒闭企业的收入等等)。

请选择最符合您个人情况的选项:

❏ 个体经营

❏ 现金收入

❏ 来自倒闭企业的工资

❏ 没有收入(含下列来源收入:薪金、加班费、兼职、退伍军人补偿金、租房或租赁总收入、现金福利、社会

保障金)

如果您是个体经营者或从已倒闭企业收到了现金收入或工资,请在下面的表格中申报总金额:

月份 金额 来源/雇主

1.

2.

3.

4.

本人了解,本人正在向波士顿市房租救济基金申报本人过去和当前的收入,以便于核查本人的申领资格以及确定救

助金额。根据伪证处罚法,本人在此声明,本人上述家庭收入在各方面均真实、准确、全面。

姓名 ___________________________________________ 日期 _______________________________________

电子签名 _______________________________________ 地址 _______________________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2
  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Aoxin Tianli Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Houliang Yu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: March 16, 2016

/s/ Houliang YuHouliang Yu

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 14602 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015-5558 March 8, 2016 Petitioner: MidwestAerial Vantage Mike Romanowski Owner 500 N
. Dominic Ave. Sioux Falls, SD 57107 Tel: 605.413.8490 Email: mwaerialvantage@gmail.com Greetings, By letter from the FAA dated January 29, 2016 an exemption was granted to Midwest Aerial Vantage for relief under Section 333
. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 14602 Regulatory Docket No. FAA- 2015-5558. MidwestAerial Vantage hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include the AgEagle RX60 small UAS. Relevant facts and reasoning are: • MidwestAerial Vantage is located in the upper mid-west where there are many agricultural operations that would benefit from the data the AgEagle system is designed to capture. • Size, weight and performance specifications of the AgEagle RX60 fall within the limitations specified in o Gross weight with payload: 7.5 pounds o Wing Span: 56 inches o Length: 6.5 inches 0 Max ground speed or calibrated airspeed: less than 87 knots. 0 Power: Li-Po battery providing up to 40 minutes of flight time 0 Max Wind Velocity: 43 mph sustained, 55 mph gusts o Landing Style: Belly Landing 0 Propulsion: One electric brushless DC motor with propeller mounted in "pusher" configuration. • The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in section 333 exemption No. 14602 apply without modification to this petition to add the Ag Eagle RX60 to that exemption
.Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional information that may be required. Sincerely, /) ,.. 

# /It**/~a ~tfZU-)Jkr** 

Mike Romanowski Owner- Midwest Aerial Vantage
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2012

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/27 10/1 10/4 40.00 32.00 28.00 99.00 1.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 10/4 10/9 10/11 40.00 32.00 28.00 99.00 1.00

10/11 10/15 10/18 40.00 32.00 28.00 25.00 123.00 2.00

10/18 10/22 10/25 40.00 32.00 28.00 98.00 2.00

10/25 10/29 11/1 25.00 32.00 28.00 100.00 -15.00

11/1 11/5 11/8 40.00 32.00 28.00 100.00 0.00

11/8 11/13 11/15 40.00 32.00 28.00 25.00 124.00 1.00

11/15 11/19 11/23 40.00 32.00 28.00 99.00 1.00

11/23 11/26 11/29 43.00 32.00 28.00 84.00 19.00

11/29 12/3 12/6 43.00 32.00 28.00 99.00 4.00

12/6 12/10 12/13 43.00 32.00 28.00 25.00 124.00 4.00

12/13 12/17 12/20 43.00 32.00 28.00 99.00 4.00

12/20 12/24 12/27 43.00 32.00 28.00 102.00 1.00

1375.00 1350.00 25.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

50-DAY BILL 11/13 11/15 27.00 27.00

Matures 1/3

29-DAY BILL 11/20 11/22 30.00 30.00 0.00

Matures 12/20

CMB Funds: 27.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

3-year Note 10/4 10/9 10/17 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 10/4 10/10 10/17 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 10/4 10/11 10/17 13.00 0.00 39.31 26.69

30-year TIPS ® 10/11 10/18 10/31 7.00 0.00

2-year Note 10/18 10/23 10/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 10/18 10/24 10/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 10/18 10/25 10/31 29.00 0.00 51.23 54.77

3-year Note 10/31 11/6 11/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note 10/31 11/7 11/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 10/31 11/8 11/15 16.00 0.00 63.09 8.91

10-year TIPS ® 11/8 11/15 11/30 13.00 0.00

2-year Note 11/21 11/27 11/30 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 11/21 11/28 11/30 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 11/21 11/29 11/30 29.00 0.00 52.34 59.66

3-year Note 11/29 12/4 12/17 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 11/29 12/5 12/17 21.00 0.00

30-year Note ® 11/29 12/6 12/17 13.00 0.00 40.22 25.78

5-year TIPS ® 12/6 12/13 12/31 14.00 0.00

2-year Note 12/13 12/18 12/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 12/13 12/19 12/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 12/13 12/20 12/31 29.00 0.00 52.41 60.59

535.00 298.58 236.42

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 288
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUN 26 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM PATRICK BABCOCK,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BOBBY BOONE, Warden, Mack H.

Alford Correctional Center;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-7105

(E. Dist. of Oklahoma)

(D.C. No. 95-CV-167-S)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, PORFILIO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

This case is before the court on petitioner William P. Babcock’s application

for a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of Babcock’s

28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. After concluding that Babcock had

procedurally defaulted his claims for post-conviction relief by failing to raise

them on direct appeal to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal appeals, Coleman v.

Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 750-53 (1991), the district court denied Babcock a

certificate of appealability.

Section 102 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA)

of 1996 requires state habeas petitioners to obtain certificates of appealability

prior to seeking appellate review of final orders in habeas proceedings. Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217 (April 26, 1996) (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2253). A

habeas petitioner is entitled to a certificate of appealability only if the petitioner

has made a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). This court has recognized that the standard for granting a

certificate of appealability under the AEDPA is the same as the standard set out

by the Supreme Court in Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983). See Lennox v.

Evans, 87 F.3d 431, 434 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 746 (1996). 

Under the Barefoot standard, a certificate will issue only where the petitioner has

demonstrated that the issues raised are debatable among jurists of reason, a court
-3-

could resolve the issues differently, or the questions presented are deserving of

further proceedings. 463 U.S. at 893 n.4.

This court has reviewed Babcock’s application for a certificate of

appealability, briefs and contentions, and the entire record on appeal. Because

Babcock has not demonstrated that the district court’s conclusion that Babcock’s

claims are procedurally barred is subject to debate or deserving of further

proceedings, we DENY Babcock a certificate of appealability and DISMISS his

appeal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge
#### Charles F. HALL v. Robert H. SCHULTZ, Judge of the Court of Record, Manatee County.

No. 39203.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Prohibition denied without opinion.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2322 

To require the President of the Government National Mortgage Association 

to testify annually before the Congress, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2021 

Mr. KUSTOFF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the President of the Government National Mortgage Association to testify annually before the Congress, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ginnie Mae Oversight 

5 and Accountability Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ANNUAL TESTIMONY. 

7 Subsection (a) of section 308 of the National Hous8 ing Act (12 U.S.C. 1723(a)) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after the subsection des10 ignation; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2322 IH

1 (2) in the last undesignated paragraph, by in2 serting ‘‘(2)’’ before ‘‘There’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(3) The President of the Association shall appear 

6 not less frequently than annually before the Committee on 

7 Financial Services of the House of Representatives and 

8 the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

9 of the Senate regarding the financial status of the Associa10 tion, the performance of its securities and the issuers of 

11 such securities, and any administrative or market chal12 lenges faced by the business model of the Association.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Chief. Documemary Services Div. Depanment ofTransp;Jnation Washington. D.C. 20590 DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS, ORDERS DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION, C-55 Aerodynamics Incorporated

. having 

### irs principal (Name of Company. please print) 25700 Science Park Drive, Suite 210 office at (Address) hereby designates. pursuant to section 

### 1005(b) 

### ofthe Federal Aviation Act 

### of 1958, the person named below as 

### its Agent upon whom service of

### all notices and process. and 

### all orders, decisions, andrequirements ofthe DepartmentofTransportation may be made for and on behalfofsaid carriec herebycanceling

### all previousdesignations

### ofagents made by 

### it to the DOT: Name of Agent ___________ R_o_b_e_r_t __

E_.__ c_o_hn ________________________________________________ _ Hogan Lovells US LLP (Please Print) 555 Thirteenth Street, NW washington, DC 20004 Address Tel 637-4999; Fax 637-5910; robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: Name fN WITNESS WHEREOF, _______ A_e_r_o_dyn __ **am_~_·**c_s_r_n_c_o_rp_o_r_a_t_e_d ________ 

### has caused these (Name of Company) presents ro be signed in its name by F. Darrell Richardson
, President (Please Print) 

### of said company, and 

### to be attested under its corporate seal by (Secretary, or other Title) 

### =P.J 2015 Aerodynamics Incorporated (Name ofCompany) 

### By: (President)

OST F 1010.5 (7-85)
#### Aaron RAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-29.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 12, 1974.

Robert P. Miller, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

*73PER CURIAM.

Having read the record and briefs and finding no reversible error demonstrated, the final judgment of the lower court ap-peáled from herein is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.


|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|/s/ | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Chief Executive Officer




|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                  
|    | David R. McHale                                  
|    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 8, 2006  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Treasury approves Texas’ plan to invest $7.8 million of CPF funding in 

multi-purpose community facilities to improve resources for communities 

that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Texas

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $7.8 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (2% of 

CPF allocation)

 Program Description: The Library Infrastructure and

Facility Access Improvement Grant (IFAIG) program is a

competitive grant program that provides funding to

public libraries for infrastructure construction projects

related to broadband expansion and digital inclusion.

The IFAIG program will prioritize public libraries located

in areas that fall below median national income levels, are rural, or lack adequate 

connectivity. 

 Key State Contact: The Texas State Library and Archives Commission

Texas’ Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Texas estimates this 

program will fund 

improvements to 85 

libraries, serving 

approximately 

1,020,000 community 

members