alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### January 21, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MICHAEL PATRICK CORRIGAN, also known as Pat Corrigan, Defendant-Appellant. No. 14-1152 (D. of Colo.) (D.C. No. 1:12-CR-00221-SJJ-1)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before LUCERO , TYMKOVICH , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges.
Michael Patrick Corrigan is currently serving a 56-month sentence after pleading guilty to four counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Mr. Corrigan appeals the district court’s judgment and sentence, claiming that the district court failed to make a clear and independent ruling as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B) on the disputed issue of the amount of loss attributable to Mr. Corrigan’s fraud. The government agrees and also asks us to remand to the district court for resentencing. After a

*This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.careful review of the record, we agree there was not a “clear and independent ruling by the district court on [this] critical disputed fact” and remand is necessary. United States v. Williams , 374 F.3d 941, 947 (10th Cir. 2004); see also United States v. Schmidt , 244 F. App’x 902, 906–07 (10th Cir. 2007) (finding the district court accepted the presentence investigation report’s findings on the disputed issue of loss amount without independent inquiry and remanding for resentencing). Accordingly, exercising our jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 3742(a), we REMAND for further proceedings, with instructions to vacate the sentence and resentence in accordance with this order and judgment. ENTERED FOR THE COURT, Timothy M. Tymkovich Circuit Judge

-2-
ERA1 Reallocation Round 2 ‐ Voluntary Reallocation to Designated Entities

Transferring Entity (Transferor) Receiving Entity (Transferee) Amount to be Reallocated

State of Arizona City of Phoenix $35,000,000.00

State of Arizona Pima County $6,000,000.00

State of Arizona City of Tucson $13,000,000.00

State of Georgia Gwinnett County $25,000,000.00

State of Georgia City of Atlanta    $21,000,000.00

State of Georgia DeKalb County $25,000,000.00

State of Georgia Fulton County $25,000,000.00

State of Georgia Cobb County $40,000,000.00

State of Georgia Augusta/Richmond County $12,000,000.00

State of Iowa Polk County   $35,000,000.00

State of Kentucky Lexington $11,700,000.00

State of Kentucky Louisville $27,000,000.00

City of Modesto, CA State of California $2,670,235.34

State of North Dakota Spirit Lake Housing Authority $1,475,266.00

State of Ohio City of Toledo $19,409,830.00

State of Ohio Cuyahoga County $51,233,575.56

State of Ohio Summit County $15,000,000.00

State of Ohio City of Cleveland $5,000,000.00

State of Ohio Hamilton County $5,000,000.00

State of Ohio Lorain County $5,000,000.00

San Joaquin, CA State of California $9,871,408.88

State of South Carolina Anderson County $1,250,000.00

Tarrant County, TX      City of Arlington $5,000,000.00

Tarrant County, TX      City of Fort Worth $10,000,000.00

State of Tennessee City of Memphis $15,570,982.96

State of Tennessee Knox County $15,570,984.00

State of Tennessee Shelby County $15,570,982.00

State of Wyoming Eastern Shoshone Housing Authority $1,800,000.00

Total $455,123,264.74

ERA1 Reallocation Round 2 ‐ Voluntary Reallocation to General Pool

Transferring Entity (Transferor) Receiving Entity (Transferee) Amount to be Reallocated

State of Delaware Treasury ‐ General Reallocation Pool $62,500,000.00

State of Wyoming Treasury ‐ General Reallocation Pool $105,000,000.00

Total $167,500,000.00
#### Ethlyn D. THORNTON, a minor, by and through her mother and next friend, Bonnie J. Thornton et al., Appellants, v. COKER PLUMBING OF HOMESTEAD, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 71-98.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, *1971.*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19-0186
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. ROBERT D.MAXIN,

Defendant and Appellant. ORDER 

# FLED AUG 0 4 2020 c.:3 ,e.enwood

Court
,,,mnntana Counsel for the Appellant Robert D. Maxin filed a motion and brief asking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders v. Califbrnia, 386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). Maxin responded to the briefand objected to counsel's motion to withdraw. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders. We have considered the arguments raised by counsel and by Maxin in his brief. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in Maxin's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant personally. 1 ( 4Lk.v...4.5+ DATED this

# c-r-- day of-RA54, 2020.
ChiefJustice



# (-2-eiz27(-c„ 08/04/2020

Case Number: DA 19-01862
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7485

HARVEY P. SHORT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHARLOTTE, Defendants - Appellees, and B. C. BALAMUCKI, Officer, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-409) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Harvey P. Short appeals a district court order dismissing claims against some, but not all, defendants in Short’s 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Tennessee

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Tennessee over

$209 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Leaders Credit Union Jackson CDFI $ 7,500,000 

Orion Federal Credit Union Memphis CDFI $ 105,000,000 

Security Bancshares, Inc. Paris CDFI $ 83,271,000 

Sequatchie County Bancorp, Inc. Dunlap CDFI $ 13,553,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
255 La. 909

#### Willie W. SONNIER v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50476.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1970.

In re: Willie W. Sonnier applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Cal-casieu. 231 So.2d 616.

Writ refused. Under the facts found hy the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellee.

No. 42213.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 10, 1973.

Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State Atty., for appellant.

Joseph A. Wanick, City Atty., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a final decree validating general obligation bonds amounting to $10,500,000.00 for construction of facilities for collection of sewage and waste water in the *City*of Miami Beach and tributary areas and its transmission to a new sewage treatment plant to be constructed as a joint project between the City of Miami Beach, City of Miami and the City of Miami Department of Water and Sewers. Upon submission to the electors, the proposed bond issue received a most favorable vote.

Apparently, no taxpayers, citizen or other person, except the State Attorney, sought to show cause why the bonds authorized should not be validated by the Circuit Court and there was no contention that any qualified voter was deprived of his or her right to vote.

Appellant has filed numerous objections and we have carefully reviewed them, as well as the briefs and record (oral argument having been waived), and find these contentions to be without merit. All requirements of the Constitution and Laws of the State of Florida pertaining to the issuance of the bonds have been fulfilled.

The final decree is affirmed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EASTERN DISTRICT

PAIGE MOODY AND KHALIL TOMLINSON, CO

- ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF GIANNA TOMLINSON,
DECEASED

v.

LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL

- CEDAR CREST, LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, LVPG

- EMERGENCY MEDICINE, TERESA M. ROMANO MD, JULIE N. PHILLIPS MD, KENNETH P.
RACHWAL PA

- C, REGINA L. WYERS PA

C VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, M.D., NATHAN
C. HIMES M.D. ALEXANDER M. KOWAL
M.D. AND MEDICAL IMAGING OF LEHIGH VALLEY, P.C., CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA, SACRED
HEART HOSP ITAL, SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEMS, SACRED HEART
PEDIATRICS ASSOCIATES AND ANDREW UNGER, M.D.

PETITION OF: LEHIGH VALLEY
HOSPITAL

- CEDAR CREST, LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, LVPG

EMERGENCY MEDICINE, TERESA M. ROMANO, M.D., JULIE N. PHILLIPS M.D.,

KENNETH P . RACHWAL PA

- C, REGINA
L. WYERS PA

- C :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 182 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM[ 182 EAL 2018 ]

- 2

AND NOW , this 12th day of September, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000072741
<NAME> NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,311,484
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    940,274
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,447,711
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     4,062,774
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,762,243
<COMMON>                                       743,404
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,102,334
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            639,973
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,365,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           15,000
<PREFERRED>                                    136,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,211,019
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           1,104,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  453,334
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       26,500
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     60,220
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               111,496
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               4,158,763
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               10,762,243
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,797,294
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            80,915
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,452,923
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,562,793
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        234,501
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (21,586)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 241,870
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       146,406
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,464
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      8,671
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   86,793
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        28,638
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         267,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62

</TABLE>
Facility Data

Facility Name - DEC ID

Utica Metal Products

6-3016-00065

Address 1526 Lincoln Ave. Utica, NY 13502

Type of business Job Shop

# of Employees 73

Hours of Operation per year 2500

Annual Revenue ($) 5,000,000

Process Type Decorative electroplating

Tank Design and Operation

Dimensions (inches) 34L x 22W x 36H

Rectifier Capacity 0-12 volts, 750 amps, 9 KW

Annual Hours of Operation 2500

Emisison Control Technology

Type of control/control device fume supressant - Zero-Mist Liquid R

control device operating parameters 45 dynes/cm

Emission test data Complete test report

Exhaust design

Emission point EP00002

Stack height (m) 9.7536 32 feet

Stack diameter (m) 0.256 inches: 16.5 Lx 19.25 W

Exit velocity (m/sec) 2.05 6.725 ft/sec

cubic meters per minute 25 890 cfm

Exit temperature (K) 294 70 degrees F

Other Available Supporting Documents

Emission Inventory Report 2009

Chromium release lbs/yr 40

Permit Application/Operating permit

Title V - online

http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/32249.html

Process flow diagrams/plant layout Attached: 3 drawings in 2 files
inches: 16.5 Lx 19.25 W

6.725 ft/sec

70 degrees F
Rinse

Rinse Drip tray

Rinse

Rinse

Nickel Rinse

Bright Nickel Vat

Semi

Bright 

Nickel

Rinse

Rinse Rectifier

Controls

Chrome Plating Tank

Ni Strip

Nickel

Activator

Pickleen

 AS-10

Hot Rinse

Not to Scale

DI

Rinse

Rinse

Warm rinse

 Rinse Zincate

Electro

 Cleaner 

Sparkleen 367

Caustic

Rinse

Nickel 

Pickle

5%

Rinse

Nickel Chrome Plate

tank length width depth freeboard

activator 36 36 36 4 202.02 179.57

160 cleaner 48 30 36 4 224.47 199.53

nickel pickle 60 30 36 3 280.58 257.20

Semi-bright nickel 72 30 36 4 336.70 299.29

 Bright nickel 72 30 36 4 336.70 299.29

chrome 34 22 36 4 116.60 103.64

chrome spray rinse 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81

chrome rinse 1 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81

chrome rinse 2 24 24 36 4 3.00 79.81

chrome rinse 3 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81

chrome rinse hot 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81

Process Tank Volumes

maximum 

volume

operating 

volume
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5778-5779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-209; RM-8885]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Belview, MN

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Action in this document allots Channel 290A to Belview, 
Minnesota, as that community's first local broadcast service in 
response to a petition filed by Harbor Broadcasting, Inc. See 61 FR 
55124, October 24, 1996. The coordinates for Channel 290A at Belview 
are 44-42-08 and 95-14-46. There is a site restriction 12.4 kilometers 
(7.7 miles) northeast of the community. With this action, this 
proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective March 17, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 290A at Belview, Minnesota, will open on March 
17, 1997, and close on April 17, 1997.


[[Page 5779]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 96-209, adopted January 24, 1997, and 
released January 31, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC. 20037, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.
    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:
    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Minnesota, 
is amended by adding Belview, Channel 290A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-3115 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
256 La. 898

#### Clinton GUILLORY and Laverne West Guillory Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of their minor child, Chauncey Guillory v. Onedia F. JOHNSON and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

No. 50888.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1970.

In re: Clinton Guillory (and wife, on behalf of Chauncey Guillory) applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline. 238 So.2d 276.

Writ refused. The case presents only factual questions, which were found adversely to applicants in the trial and appellate courts.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,870]


Solvay Animal Health, Incorporated, Mendota Heights, Minnesota; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on October 6, 1997 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at Solvay Animal Health, Incorporated, 
Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose; and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 25th day of November 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-32293 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
255 La. 288

#### Aveneal MEAUX and Dudley Bourque v. LOUISIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS.

No. 50347.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 6, 1970.

In re: Department of Highways of the State of Louisiana applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, State Civil Service Commission.

Writ refused. The result is correct.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31955]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

November 24, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0949.
    Form Number: IRS Form 2587.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application for Special Enrollment Examination.
    Description: This information relates to the determination of the 
eligibility of individuals seeking enrollment status to practice before 
the Internal Revenue Service.
    Respondents: Individual or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 8,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper: 6 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other (one-time filing).
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 25,550 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-31955 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### COMMUNITY CABLECASTING CORPORATION v. DANIELS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No. 38083.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 17.