alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31921]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33518]


Burlington Shortline, Inc., d/b/a Burlington Junction Railway--
Acquisition and Operation Exemption--The Burlington Northern and Santa 
Fe Railway Company

    Burlington Shortline, Inc., d/b/a Burlington Junction Railway 
(BSL), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of 
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire and operate approximately 
9,205 feet, or 1.74 miles, of rail line owned by The Burlington 
Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) between a point 247 feet 
south of BNSF's mainline switch east of BNSF's equipment maintenance 
facility at Burlington, IA, and a point 9,452 feet south of BNSF's 
mainline switch, in the vicinity of Burlington, Des Moines County, 
Iowa. BSL will interchange traffic with BNSF at Burlington.
    The transaction was expected to be consummated on or after the 
November 24, 1997 effective date of the exemption.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33518, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on: John D. Heffner, Rea, Cross & Auchincloss, Suite 420, 1920 N 
Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036.

    Decided: December 1, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31921 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  Twelve Months Ended(Thousands of Dollars)

|               |                                                    | March
2002                                         |         | December
2001
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ------- | -------------
|Earnings       |                                                    |                                                    |         |              
|               | Net Income                                         |                                                    | $       | 641,896      
|               | Income Tax                                         |                                                    |         | 405,311      
|               |                                                    |                                                    |         |              
|               |                                                    | Total Earnings Before Income Tax                   |         |              
|Fixed Charges* |                                                    |                                                    | 405,507 |              
|               |                                                    |                                                    |         |              
|               |                                                    | Total Earnings Before Income Tax and Fixed Charges |         | $            
|               |                                                    |                                                    |         |              
|               | * Fixed Charges                                    |                                                    |         |              
|               | Interest on Long-Term Debt                         |                                                    | $       | 342,390      
|               | Amortization of Debt Discount, Premium and Expense |                                                    |         | 12,634       
|               | Interest on Component of Rentals                   |                                                    |         | 17,466       
|               | Other Interest                                     |                                                    |         | 33,017       
|               |                                                    |                                                    |         |              
|               |                                                    | Total Fixed Charges                                |         | $            
|               |                                                    |                                                    |         |              
|               | Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                 |                                                    |         | 3.58         

---

QuickLinks
Treasury approves Maryland’s plan to invest $45 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Maryland

 

▪ Program Summary: $45 million for Broadband Infrastructure (26% of CPF allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 15,000 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: The Connect Maryland: Broadband for 

Public Housing (MD-BPH) Program is a new competitive grant 

program designed to bring high-speed internet access to 

publicly- owned Multi-Dwelling Units (MDUs) by upgrading 

units with reliable, high-speed internet and installing public 

Wi-Fi in common areas. 

‒ This program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps upon project 

completion.

‒ Internet service providers utilizing investments funded by CPF will be required to participate in 

the FCC’s Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income 

families. 

▪ Key State Contact: The Maryland Office of Statewide Broadband (OSB)

Maryland Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Maryland, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~11% of locations still 

lacking high-speed internet 

access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2007-0218 Directorate Identifier: 92-ANE-56-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

4 cyl inspection 0.2 $ 17.00 $ 17.00 21,180 $360,060.00

6 cyl inspection 0.5 $ 42.50 $ 42.50 21,449 $911,582.50

8 cyl inspection 0.7 $ 59.50 $ 59.50 256 $15,232.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,286,875

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
The final rule total cost estimate has been reduced by $85,770 from the total cost estimate in the 

proposed AD, which published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2011 (76 FR 8661). The 

proposed AD total cost estimate included a $2 cost per engine for parts.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 15    November 6, 2009    Northeast Utilities 56 Prospect Street Hartford, Connecticut 06103  We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated November 6, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-141425 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-63144, 333-121364, and 333-142724 on Forms S-8.  We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.  /s/ Deloitte & Touche Deloitte & Touche  Hartford, Connecticut
EXHIBIT 32.1

UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLC

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of United Maritime Group, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Green, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLCBy:

/s/ Steven GreenSteven GreenChief Executive Officer
(duly authorized signatory and principal executive officer of the Company)Date: March 30, 2011
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

Commission File Number 000-00643

 

 

CORNING NATURAL GAS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

**New York **16-0397420
(State of incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
**330 West William Street, Corning New York 14830

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
**(607) 936-3755**
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "accelerated filer", "large accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated File [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ] Non-accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller Reporting Company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate the number of Shares outstanding of each of the issuer's common stock as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $5.00 par value
809,550
Class
Shares outstanding as of August 14, 2008

As used in this Form 10-Q, the terms "Company," "Corning," "Registrant," "we," "us," and "our" mean Corning Natural Gas Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless the context indicates otherwise. Except as otherwise stated, the information contained in this Form 10-Q is as of June 30, 2008.******
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOSE RIVERA,

Petitioner

v.

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.,

BRENNTAG NORTHEAST INC., BARLEY

SNYDER, AND ALAN J. HAY, M.D.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 672 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 188; Minimum Aviation System Performance 
Standards for High Frequency Data Link

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for an 
RTCA Special Committee 188 meeting to be held January 7-9, 1998, 
starting at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 7, and 9:00 a.m. on January 
8 and 9. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.
    January 7: Working Group 1 Minimum Aviation System Performance 
Standards (MASPS); January 8: Continue Working Group 1; January 9: 
Plenary Session.
    The agenda of the Plenary Session will be as follows: (1) 
Introductory Remarks; (2) Review and Approval of Meeting Agenda; (3) 
Approval of the Summary of the Previous Meeting; (4) Review of Working 
Group 1 (MASPS) Work; (5) Discussion of Air Mobility Command Data Link 
Initiatives; (6) Review Activities of Other Standards Groups; (7) Open 
Discussion; (8) Dates and Places of Next Meetings; (9) Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 28, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-31933 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32084]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


List of Institutions of Higher Education Ineligible for Federal 
Funds

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is published to identify institutions of higher 
education that are ineligible for contracts and grants by reason of a 
determination by the Secretary of Defense that the institution prevents 
military recruiter access to the campus or students or maintains a 
policy against ROTC. It also implements the requirements set forth in 
the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997 and 32 CFR Part 
216. Currently, a single institution is ineligible for contracts of 
grants, the Washington College of Law of American University, 
Washington, DC.
    Recently, William Mitchell College of Law reported modifications to 
school policies sufficient to merit removal from the list of ineligible 
schools.

ADDRESSES: Director for Accession Policy, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Force Management Policy, 4000 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William J. Carr, (703) 697-8444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 6, 1997 (62 FR 52091), the 
Department of Defense published 32 CFR part 216 as an interim rule. 
This rule requires that the Department of Defense semi-annually publish 
a list of the institutions of higher education ineligible for Federal 
funds due to a policy or practice that either prohibits, or in effect 
prevents, the Secretary of Defense from obtaining, for military 
recruiting purposes, entry to campuses, access to students on campuses, 
access to directory information on students or that has an anti-ROTC 
policy. On November 18, 1997 (62 FR 61495), the Department of Defense 
published a list of the institutions of higher education ineligible for 
Federal Funding; this listing updates and supersedes that listing.

    Dated: December 3, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-32084 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-172742 on Form S-8, of our report dated April 29, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Camelot Information Systems Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Group”) and related financial statement schedule of Camelot Information Systems Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Group’s adoption of the authoritative guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income), and our report dated April 29, 2013,  relating to the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Camelot Information Systems Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP

Beijing, the People’s Republic of China

April 29, 2013

 

----
# L_2013223EN.01S00302.xml

| 21.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 223/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 223/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
#### Damzel L. JACKSON v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 39407.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 224 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5302 Galveston Road in Houston, Texas, as the ‘‘Vanessa Guille ́n Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2021 

Ms. GARCIA of Texas (for herself, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. BABIN, Mr. 

VELA, Ms. JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. ROY, Mr. 

VEASEY, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, and Mr. GREEN of 

Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5302 Galveston Road in Houston, Texas, as 

the ‘‘Vanessa Guille ́n Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VANESSA GUILLE ́ N POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 5302 Galveston Road in Hous6 ton, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Vanessa Guille ́n Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 224 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Vanessa Guille ́n Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS