alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000023426
<NAME> THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            3,820,873
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                            384,335
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 743,373
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             1,327,315
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       6,275,896
<COMMON>                                               122,229
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                              640,077
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                    535,184
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                       1,297,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  155,000
<PREFERRED>                                            116,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                 1,816,657
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                     200,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                          224,116
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                    0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                            144,062
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        12,370
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       2,310,001
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                        6,275,896
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                              624,908
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                       931
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             600,924
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             601,760
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                 23,148
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                       4,102
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                          27,155
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                33,586
<NET-INCOME>                                            (6,431)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                              3,805
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                          (10,236)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                 5,989
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                    0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 (27,570)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.00
        




</TABLE>
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          JUL-31-2000             JUL-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               APR-30-2000             APR-30-2000
[CASH]                                       1,875,516               1,875,516
[SECURITIES]                                         0                       0
[RECEIVABLES]                                1,170,062               1,170,062
[ALLOWANCES]                                   (6,000)                 (6,000)
[INVENTORY]                                  3,278,681               3,278,681
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             6,674,784               6,674,784
[PP&E]                                       1,783,442               1,783,442
[DEPRECIATION]                             (1,632,539)             (1,632,539)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               7,321,256               7,321,256
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          237,697                 237,697
[BONDS]                                              0                       0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                           77,500                  77,500
[PREFERRED]                                        597                     597
[COMMON]                                        69,309                  69,309
[OTHER-SE]                                   6,901,869               6,901,869
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 7,321,256               7,321,256
[SALES]                                      1,774,106               4,094,057
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                             1,858,602               4,389,440
[CGS]                                        1,304,263               3,341,843
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                1,648,220               4,248,168
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0                       0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0                       0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0                       0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                210,382                 141,272
[INCOME-TAX]                                     1,310                   3,550
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            209,072                 137,722
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0                       0
[CHANGES]                                            0                       0
[NET-INCOME]                                   209,072                 137,722
[EPS-BASIC]                                       .034                    .022
[EPS-DILUTED]                                     .034                    .022
</TABLE>
#### FLORIDA GENERAL LINEN SUPPLY v. BOARD OF BUSINESS REGULATIONS of the State of Florida et al.

No. 39354.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
August 1, 2011

The Honorable Ray LaHood U.S. Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Secretary LaHood:

On behalf of the Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB), please know that our organizati on is solidly in support of the Small Community Air Service Development Progr am grant request from the City of Naples Airport Authority. This fundi ng request, in the amount of $750,000, will be used as part of a multi-million dollar effort to reintroduce commercial airline service to Naples Municipal Airport (APF).

Since 2005, Naples, FL, like many small co mmunities throughout the nation, has

seen a reduction or elimination of commerc ial air service. However, Naples is unique to many of these communitie s in possessing the population and

infrastructure to make commercial air service a success. There is a serious and growing air service deficien cy throughout the region serv ed by our airport. Your support of this application will assist th e Naples Airport Authority to meet the needs of local businesses, residents a nd the visitors who enjoy our beautiful community each year.

As the official destination marketing or ganization for Collier County, we are very interested in supporting new air service fo r the Naples Airport. We are committed to assisting the Naples Airport Authority in promoting any new service on our website, our annual visitor guide and th rough our world-wide Public Relations efforts. We anticipate that we c ould commit up to $100,000 through in-kind and cash contributions to promote new air service in the coming year.

We hope you will seriously consider the application from the Naples Airport Authority for $750,000 in air service development assistance.

Sincerely,

Jack W. Wert,

Executive Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 2.2(i)


                 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

     This is a First Amendment (the "Amendment") to that certain Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), made and entered into as of April 29,
1996, by and among HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., a New York corporation
("HMS"), CDR ACQUISITION CORP., a Maryland corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of HMS ("Sub"), CDR Associates, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("CDR"),
and the principal shareholders of CDR, whose names appear on the signature page
of the Merger Agreement (the "Principals"). This Amendment is dated as of April
29, 1996.

1. Section 6.2(c) of the Merger Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.

2. Section 15.3(a) of the Merger Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
the following inserted in its place and stead:

     (a) The indemnities set forth in this Article 14 and all representations,
warranties and covenants hereunder shall survive for a period ending on, and not
to exceed, the date on which the Company issues its Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ending October 31, 1996, together with the accompanying
audited financial statements thereto. Upon the expiration of such period, the
Principals shall have no liability for Damages under such indemnification
provisions unless HMS has been given notice of a claim asserting liability by a
third party prior to the expiration of such period and thereafter provides
notice to the Principals in the manner provided in Section 15.2 above.

3. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement and Plan remains in full
force and effect without modification thereto.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HMS, CDR and each Principal have caused this Amendment
to be duly signed all as of the date first above written.


HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.

By:  /s/ Paul J. Kerz
     ----------------
         Paul J. Kerz

CDR ASSOCIATES, INC.

By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Donnelly
   ------------------------
     JEFFREY R. DONNELLY

    /s/ Joseph H. Czajkowski
   -------------------------
    JOSEPH H. CZAJKOWSKI
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 25, 2010 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with
the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2010-A (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial
Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2012, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2013
|    |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00159-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.L. and N.R.L., Children

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29248

Honorable Sergio J. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant R.R.J. because she is indigent.

SIGNED August 21, 2013.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Todd M.
Sakow, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The accompanying Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       | 
|/s/:   |  | Todd M. Sakow          
|Name:  |  | Todd M. Sakow          
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  |  | March 31, 2011         

The foregoing certification is being
furnished with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates by reference.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Midstream Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David C. Shiels, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAVID C. SHIELS    
|David C. Shiels        
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|Date: March 11, 2011
### November 28, 2012

This information is based upon and validated by the general knowledge of the Dow

Building Solutions and the Polyurethanes Research and Development groups at The Dow

Chemical Company.



## THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

Dow Building Solutions employs polymeric Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI)

which contains some Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) in various products. The

information herein is i n response to the EPA request for information on curing time and

re

- entry of a bui lding following application of a material with MDI containing

compounds

.

### Further info rmation on product use instructions, material safety data sheets, and

general literature for Dow Building Solutions is found publicly at

http://building.dow.com/na/en/

The information provided is presented in good faith and is based on the best of my

knowledge, information and belief as of today.

* T rademark s of The Dow Chemical C ompany

Notice: No freedom from any patent owned by Dow or others is to be inferred. Because use conditions and applicable laws may d iffer

from one location to another and may change with time, Customer is responsible for determining whether products and th e information in this document are appropriate for Customer’s use and for ensuring that Customer’s workplace and disposal pract ices

are in compliance with applicable laws and other governmental enactments. Dow assumes no obligation or liability for the inf ormation

in this document. NO WARRANTIES ARE GIVEN; ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS

FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED

### References

1 Brown, WE. (1987) The Chemistry and Biochemistry of Isocyanates: An Overview.

Chapter 8. In: Current Topics in Pulmonary Pharmacology and Toxicology. Volume

1. Hollinger, MA, ed. Elsevier. Cited from EPA Toxicological Review of Methylene

diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) (CAS No. 101

- 68

- 8 and 9016

- 87

- 9) In Support of Summary

Information on the Int egrated Risk Information System (IRIS) February 1998, U.S.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC

2 ASTM Standard D7487

- 08, 2008, “Standard Practice for Polyurethane Raw Materials:

Polyurethane Foam Cup Test,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008, DOI:

10.1520/D7487

- 08, www.astm.org

.

3 Van Gheluwe, P.; Leroux, J. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1983

, 28 , 2053.

4 Hébrard, M.J.; Laroux, J. Analytical Instrumentation 1986 , 15 , 201.

5 Lovering, E.G.; Laidler, K.J. Can J. Chem. 1962

, 40 , 26.
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except share amounts)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           1999           1998           1997
                                       ------------   ------------   ------------

<S>                                    <C>            <C>            <C>
Net income                             $     13,535   $      8,654   $      5,275
                                       ============   ============   ============

Weighted average shares outstanding:

     Basic                                  107,248        100,451         73,658
                                       ============   ============   ============

     Diluted                                108,462        101,315         74,222
                                       ============   ============   ============

Earnings per common share - Basic      $     126.20   $      86.15   $      71.62
Effect of stock options                       (1.41)         (0.74)         (0.54)
                                       ------------   ------------   ------------

Earnings per common share - Diluted    $     124.79   $      85.41   $      71.08
                                       ============   ============   ============
</TABLE>
256 La. 795

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lionel SMITH.

No. 50813.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1970.

In re: Lionel Smith applying for writ of mandamus.

Writs refused. The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant an exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
## CONTACT REPORT

Date/Time Project Name Project Number

December 14 , 20 1 1 3 : 30p m Ferroalloys RTR MME

- 4 11

Originator Contact Phone Number

Jonathan Averback Amy Lincoln, Beveridge & Diamond,

C ounsel for Felman Production, Inc. N/A

General Subject

Today at about 3:30 PM

, I received a telephone call from Amy Lincoln, counsel for Felman, regarding the company's request for an extension of the comment period deadline for an additional 45 days. She highlighted information in the company's request, and acknowledged recei ving EPA’s confirmation letter verifying receipt of their request

. I indicated EPA is still considering the request. No new significant information was presented

in this call.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the annual
period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr., as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of
my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|/s/ Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr. |                                                 
|-------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------
|Name:                      | Robert D. Pomeroy, Jr.                          
|Title:                     | Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board



Date: March 8, 2016