alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Department of Energy 

Wa shington, DC 20585 


August 16, 2013 


Ms. Kateri Callahan 

President, Alliance to Save Energy 

1850 M Street NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Dear Ms. Callahan: 

Thank you for your July 26, 2013, letter to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) regarding DOE's 

participation in the development of the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). We 

appreciate efforts by the Alliance to Save Energy and its partners to help achieve the collective 30% 

energy savings goal in the current IECe. The Department looks forward to continuing to participate in 

IECC development by submitting cost-effective code amendments that result in increased energy 

efficiency and help the code be more easily understood, applied, and enforced. 

DOE's participation in the industry process for the review and modification of building codes is guided 

by Title III of the Energy Conservation and Production Act, as amended. The Act specifies that DOE 

shall "seek adoption of all technologically feasible and economically justified energy efficiency 

measures." DOE is committed to pursue and support such measures. 

As part of pursuing these measures, DOE provided an opportunity for the public to comment on its 

efficiency concepts and draft proposals for the 2015 IECC, which included the topic of adding residential 

equipment tradeoffs back into the code. Ofthe draft proposals, DOE selected a subset to analyze and put 

forward at the 2015 International Code Conference Public Comment Hearings that had positive feedback 

from stakeholders regarding the energy efficiency savings. DOE received diverse opinions on the net 

energy savings from the equipment tradeoff's proposal and thus did not include it among those selected. 

Regarding the Department's participation in the upcoming ICC Public Comment Hearings, DOE does 

intend to provide the maximum representation permitted (12 staff) and to exercise its voting privileges in 

a manner consistent with the Council's rules and procedures. 

The Department values your support and looks forward to working with the Alliance to Save Energy to 

create and implement more energy-efficient building energy codes and standards. If you have additional 

questions, please contact Jeremiah Williams, Building Technologies Office, at (202) 287-1941. 

Sincerely, 

C/U6~ Kathleen B. Hogan 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

*Printed wit)"! soy ink on recycled papel
Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

A	d v s on	of	the	Amer can	Chem ca 	Soc ety	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-ma : answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/c ent-serv ces/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540	Olentangy	River	Road					•					P.O.	Box	3343					•					Columbus,	OH		43210-0334					•					USA
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

May 12, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Exemption Request Under 

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI), an 

engineering consulting and construction management firm and operator of small 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS), seeks an exemption from the following listed Code 

of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, precision aerial 

photogrammetric mapping and topographic surveys for engineering inspection of 

transportation and building infrastructure projects and associated market research. 

Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

 

Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. has requested that the FAA not solicit public comment on its

petition because it would not set a precedent and because the relief requested is identical 

to exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, GPI will be utilizing the same DJI proven technologies the FAA has already 

scrutinized and approved for numerous other Section 333 exemptions. Also, GPI’s

package accompanying the Section 333 Petition for Exemption is robust, thorough, and 

comprehensive, and along with all of the published Phantom 2 Vision+ Manuals, includes 

the GPI Standard Operating Procedures, including Safety Management Systems, 

Maintenance Manual, and applicable operational checklists. 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

All of the appropriate documentation to accompany GPI’s Section 333 Petition is included. 

Combined, this comprehensive package, the approvals the FAA has already given to DJI 

products and the technology, should provide the support necessary to the FAA for a 

summary grant of GPI’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Jim Williams

Joe Morra

Jake Troutman

Robert Papas 

Dean Griffith, Esq.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GINA DEBELLIS,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (DERMATOLOGY, LTD),

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 321 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Greektown Superholdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clifford J. Vallier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Clifford J. VallierClifford J. VallierMarch 25, 2011




- 103 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18272
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      17772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 40055
<PP&E>                                           25344
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   67034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           643
<OTHER-SE>                                       38364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     67034
<SALES>                                          80588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 80588
<CGS>                                            60088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    76750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (428)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3749
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2362
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2362
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-167569 and No. 333-167574) on Form S-8, of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. of our report dated December 14,2010, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 (Successor Company), and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2010, the period August 31, 2009 to September 30, 2009 (Successor Company), the periodOctober 1, 2008 to August 30, 2009, and the year ended September 30, 2008 (Predecessor Company), and the related financial statement schedule II, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Our report refers to explanatory paragraphs that describe the Successor Company’s adoption of the provisions of ASCTopic 852, “*Reorganization*” formerly American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 90-7, “*Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code”*in 2009, andthe adoption of the measurement date provision in conformity with ASC 715, “*Compensation – Retirement Benefits*” formerly FAS 158, “*Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and other PostretirementPlans*” in 2009. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

December 14, 2010
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Harold J. VINCENT.

No. 53851.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Harold J. Vincent, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LINDELL MCFADDEN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4303

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed August 9, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
**1 |**  Page **UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460** 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION PC Code No.: 124871 DP Barcode: 387358 Date: April 11, 2011
**MEMORANDUM** Subject: EFED Risk Assessment for the Proposed IR

- 4 Use of the Spirodiclofen Product

ENVIDOR® as an Insecticide on Tropical Fruits
To: Rita Kumar, RM Reviewer

John Hebert, RM 07 Registration Division
From: Joseph DeCant, Ecologist

Larry Liu, Ph.D., Chemist Environmental Risk Branch V Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) Through: Mah Shamim, Ph.D., Branch Chief

Environmental Risk Branch V Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) The current IR

- 4 registration requested for the use of the spirodiclofen product ENVIDOR® on certain tropical fruits has been reviewed by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED). The tropical fruits covered under this registration request include acerola, atemo ya, biriba, cherimoya, custard apple, feijoa, jaboticaba, guava, ilama, longan, lychee, passionfruit, persimmon, pulasan, rambutan, soursop, Spanish lime, starfruit, sugar apple, wax jambu. The registrant is seeking a new use of spirodiclofen as an insecticide to control broad mite, c armine spider mite, flat mite, persea mite, s ixspotted mite, Texas citrus mite, and twospotted spider mite on these crop areas. The uses and re levant application information are summarized in **Table 1.** The previous assessment for spirodiclofen (DP barcode 300903, 293789, 284995, 309421; completed 3/9/05) and subsequent update memo (DP barcode 317317; completed 8/15/05) can be used in place of a new assessment for the currentl y proposed rate for the specified tropical fruits

. The previous assessment for tropical fruits (D361042) also relied on this assessment due to lower maximum seasonal application rates for tropical fruits relative to the use s under D300903+.**2 |**  Page

**T able 1.**  Use information for the proposed use of spirodiclofen as an insectide

. The use in bold represents the new use, whereas the other specified use has been previously assessed.

Uses Single

application rate (lb ai/A) Maximum

application number per season Maximum

application rate per season or ye ar (lb ai/A/season) Application

methods
Tropical Fruit (including avocado, black Sapote, canistel, mamey sapote, mango, papaya, sapodilla, star apple) 0.28

- 0.31 1 0.31 Airblast, Aerial, Ground **Tropical Fruit (including**  **acerola, atemoya, biriba,**  **cherimoya, custard apple, feijoa, jaboticaba,**  **guava, ilama, longan, lychee, passionfruit,**  **persimmon, pulasan, rambutan, soursop,**  **Spanish lime, starfruit, sugar apple, wax jambu)**  **0.28**
**- 0.31**  **1 0.31**  **Airblast, Aerial,**  **Ground**
•" 

Memorandum of Understanding 

In connection with the signing today of the Agreement between the Government of the United 

States of America and the Government of Hungary to Improve International Tax Compliance and 

to Implement FATCA (hereafter referred to as the "Agreement"), the Government of the United 

States of America and the Government of Hungary have reached the following understanding 

concerning the Agreement. 

It is understood that the Convention between the Government of the United States of America 

and the Government of the Republic of Hungary for the A voidance of Double Taxation and the 

Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, done at Budapest on February 4, 

2010, once it has entered into force, would be considered a "successor Convention" as such term 

is used in the Agreement. 

Signed at !?JPAPE~i , in duplicate, in the English language, this :f~ay of fEB~vA{\'1, 20~ 

FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 

FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF 

HUNGARY:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000072741
<NAME> NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    6,290,148
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    775,470
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         784,391
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,108,411
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,958,420
<COMMON>                                       684,503
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      934,316
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            695,846
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,167,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          197,072
<PREFERRED>                                    136,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         3,364,622
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              80,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  274,827
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       30,250
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    159,886
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                51,373
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               3,349,525
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                9,958,420
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,833,714
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            24,060
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,682,542
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,716,930
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        116,784
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              10,959
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 138,071
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       135,614
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,457
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     14,133
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  (11,676)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         402,471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2096 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2096

      To prohibit the non-consensual release of claims by States, 
   municipalities, federally recognized Tribes, or the United States 
              against non-debtors, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2021

 Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (for herself and Mr. DeSaulnier) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit the non-consensual release of claims by States, 
   municipalities, federally recognized Tribes, or the United States 
              against non-debtors, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop shielding Assets from Corporate 
Known Liability by Eliminating non-debtor Releases Act'' or the 
``SACKLER Act''.

SEC. 2. NON-DEBTOR RELEASES.

    (a) Prohibition on Certain Non-Debtor Releases.--Section 105(b) of 
title 11, United States Code, is amended by striking ``a court may 
not'' and all that follows, and inserting the following: ``a court may 
not--
            ``(1) appoint a receiver in a case under this title; or
            ``(2) except as provided by section 524(g) of this title, 
        enjoin or release a claim against a non-debtor by a State, 
        municipality, federally recognized Tribe, or the United 
        States.''.
    (b) Temporary Stay on Actions Against Non-Debtors.--Section 105 of 
title 11, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(e) Notwithstanding subsection (b)(2), a court may issue an order 
staying, for a period not to exceed 90 days, the commencement or 
continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a 
judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding by a State, 
municipality, federally recognized Tribe, or the United States against 
a non-debtor that was or could have been commenced before the 
commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim 
against a non-debtor that arose before the commencement of the case 
under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Annual Report of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the “company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emanuele Lauro, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Date: March 16, 2017/s/ Emanuele LauroEmanuele LauroChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Samuel SILVERSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11230.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

May 26, 1970.

Harrison & Brown, by John M. Brown, Shreveport, for appellant.

Mayer & Smith, by Charles L. Mayer, Shreveport, for appellee.

Before AYRES, BOLIN and DIXON, JJ.

BOLIN, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Silberman v. Firemen’s Insurance Company, 238 So.2d 236, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
U.S. Department of the Treasury 

State Small Business Credit Initiative (SSBCI) Program 

Application Deadline for the Technical Assistance Grant Program Extended for States, the 

District of Columbia, and Territories 

May 2022 

The U.S. Department of the Treasury is extending the deadline for States, the District of 

Columbia, and territories to submit their SSBCI Technical Assistance (TA) Grant Program 

applications to September 1, 2022, at 11:59 p.m. EST. Treasury published guidelines applicable 

to the TA Grant Program on April 28, 2022 (available here). 

As previously announced, the deadline for Tribal governments to apply for the SSBCI capital 

Program and the TA Grant Program is September 1, 2022.