alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF MAINE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

 JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI DAVID P. LITTELL 

 GOVERNOR COMMISSIONER 

AUGUSTA 

17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE 

AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK 

(207) 287-7688 FAX: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, ME 04401 PORTLAND, ME 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, ME 04769-2094 

RAY BLDG., 28 TYSON DR. (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 764-1507

web site: www.maine.gov/dep printed on recycled paper 

March 13, 2009 

Mr. Roy Koster 

Central Maine Power Company 

83 Edison Drive 

Augusta, Maine 04336 

Re: O’Connor Superfund Site 

 Easement Request-Greater Augusta Utility District 

Dear Mr. Koster: 

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) has reviewed the March 2, 2009 letter from 

Central Maine Power Company (CMP) regarding the request from the Greater Augusta Utility District for a 

30 foot easement along Route 17 through the O’Connor Superfund Site for the purpose of installing a 

sewer main. MEDEP has reviewed this letter in accordance with the September 13, 2002 Restrictive 

Covenant for the O’Connor Site. 

DEP suggests that CMP strongly encourage the Greater Augusta Utility District to route the sewer line on 

the other side of Route 17 to avoid the issues associated with a Superfund Site and the potential for 

impacting the remedy. If re-routing the sewer ling is truly not feasible, the following information and 

conditions will need to be provided and agreed to in writing before MEDEP can provide approval of the 

activity: 

• Start work notification to CMP, EPA, and MEDEP project managers; 

• Prevention of infringement into the Designated Area, particularly PTA, with equipment, soil 

disturbance or spoils; 

• Remedial measures to be taken, if blasting of bedrock is necessary, to prevent disturbance of the 

remedial components (i.e., riprap, lagoons, etc.); 

• Analyses and disposal of spoils; 

• A contingency plan to notify CMP, MEDEP and EPA if during the installation if any unexpected 

situation occur (i.e., buried debris, odors, oily material etc); 

• And identification of who is responsible for any repairs to the remedial components. (MEDEP 

suggests that a pre and post work video be taken of the site as visual documentation.) 
2 

If blasting is necessary it may be necessary to perform an extra monitoring event to ensure that it did not 

impact the equilibrium of the groundwater contamination. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any comments or want to discuss 

this in more detail please call me at (207) 287-7713 or email me at claudia.b.sait@maine.gov

Respectfully, 

Claudia Sait 

Project Manager 

Bureau of Remediation & Waste Management 

Cf: File 

 Ted Wolfe-MEDEP 

 Terrence Connelly-EPA
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
          I, James E. Hausman, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of CT Communications, Inc., certify that:
          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CTCommunications, Inc.;
          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;
          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;
          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
          (b) [Intentionally omitted]
          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 5, 2004     By: /s/ James E. Hausman     James E. Hausman   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5

<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the September 30, 1998 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated 
statements of income, reinvested earnings and cash flows for the nine-month 
period ended 9/30/98 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>       1,000
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                 SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                            10,494
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    164,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       6,772
<INVENTORY>                                                      213,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 429,720
<PP&E>                                                         3,604,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 1,010,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 3,667,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            251,823
<BONDS>                                                        1,056,014
<COMMON>                                                          90,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     1,266,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   3,667,155
<SALES>                                                        1,517,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               1,517,026
<CGS>                                                          1,249,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  1,249,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  74,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                72,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  146,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      58,618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               87,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   (4,603)
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      83,322
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.92
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32361]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
Health Care Industry; Notice of Public Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
Health Care Industry. This two-day meeting will be open to the public, 
limited only by the space available.

    Place of meeting: Omni Shoreham Hotel, 2500 Calvert Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20008. Exact locations of the sessions will 
be available at the registration area and on the Commission's web 
site, ``http://www.hcqualitycommission.gov''.
    Times and Dates: The public meeting will span two days. On 
Tuesday, December 16, 1997, the subcommittee break-out sessions will 
take place from 8:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. On Wednesday, December 17, 
1997, the general plenary session will begin at 8:00 a.m. and it 
will continue until 4:00 p.m.
    Purpose/Agenda: To hear testimony and continue formal 
proceedings of the Commission and the three (3) remaining 
subcommittees (Subcommittee on Consumer Rights has completed its 
work). Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person: For more information, including substantive 
program information and summaries of the meeting, please contact: 
Edward (Chip) Malin, Hubert Humphrey Building, Room 118F, 200 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20201; (202/205-3333).

    Dated: December 3, 1997.
Janet Corrigan,
Executive Director, Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and 
Quality in the Health Care Industry.
[FR Doc. 97-32361 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4110-60-M
#### Jack GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-54.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 1973.

Raymond L. Syfrett and Herman D. Laramore, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen, and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments of the lower court hereby appealed are affirmed. State v. Herzig (Fla.1968) 208 So.2d 619.

CARROLL, DONALD K, Acting C. J, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ, concur.
256 La. 904

#### PARK PLACE HOMES, INC. v. Kim PETERSEN and Bob Frick d/b/a Mortgage Consultant Associates.

No. 50919.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1970.

In re: Kim Petersen and Bob Frick applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. Relator has a remedy by appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 62262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30687]



[[Page 62262]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD11-97-009]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal 
Canal, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Coast Guard has issued a 
temporary deviation to the regulations governing the opening of the 
Fruitvale Railroad Vertical Lift Bridge over the Oakland Inner Harbor 
Tidal Canal. The deviation allows Alameda County, on behalf of the U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers, to provide an opening on 30 minutes advance 
notice between sunrise and sunset from December 1 through December 20, 
1997. At all other times, the bridge will continue to operate under its 
published regulations. The purpose of this deviation is to allow the 
Corps of Engineers to perform an electromagnetic test for adequacy of 
the bridge's 32 haul ropes.

DATES: The effective period of the deviation begins on Monday, December 
1, 1997 and continues through Saturday, December 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Jerry P. Olmes, Bridge Administrator, Eleventh Coast Guard 
District, Building 50-6 Coast Guard Island, Alameda, CA, at (510) 437-
3514.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard anticipates that the 
economic consequences of this deviation will be minimal. Mariners can 
avoid experiencing any adverse consequences throughout the effective 
period by either providing the bridge operator 30 minutes advance 
notice between sunrise and sunset or transiting at other times. 
Moreover, the Coast Guard expects the bridge to resume its normal 
operating schedule before the end of the effective period if the Corps 
of Engineers completes its tests in less than 20 days.
    This deviation from the normal operating regulations in 33 CFR 
117.181 is authorized in accordance with the provisions of 33 CFR 
117.35.

    Dated: November 6, 1997.
J.C. Card,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 97-30687 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1288

CLARENCE ANDREW MCGUFFIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-cv-00467-D)

Submitted: August 15, 2017 Decided: September 26, 2017

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Andrew McGuffin, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States

Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Andrew McGuffin appeals the district court’s order granting the 

defendant’s motion to dismiss McGuffin’s complaint as untimely filed. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. McGuffin v. Berryhill, No. 5:16-cv-00467-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 

3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2403 

To amend the Labor Management Relations Act to prohibit neutrality 

agreements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia (for himself, Mr. PERRY, Mrs. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. 

GAETZ, and Mr. FALLON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Labor Management Relations Act to prohibit 

neutrality agreements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON NEUTRALITY AGREEMENTS. 

4 Section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act 

5 (29 U.S.C. 186) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 

7 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or deliver’’ each place it 

8 appears and inserting ‘‘provide, or deliver’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2403 IH

1 ‘‘(h) As used in this section, the term ‘thing of value’ 

2 includes organizing assistance.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment No. 1
to the Annual Report of China Modern Agricultural Information, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Youliang Wang,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: October 2, 2017 | By: | /s/ Youliang Wang                                                              
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Youliang Wang                                                                  
|                      |     | Principal Executive Officer
        China Modern Agricultural Information, Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonel MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-50716.

D.C. No. CR-01-2159-HDM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, and TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Leonel Mendoza-Martinez appeals his alien smuggling conviction. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1324. He argues that the district court’s denial of his request to continue the trial on September 11, 2001, violated his right to a fair trial. *See*U.S. Const. Amend. VI. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

(1) Mendoza-Martinez’s claim is moot. Moments after the district court denied his request to “continue the trial at least a day or so,” the courthouse was shut down by an order of the Chief Judge, and the case was continued until the following day. Mendoza-Martinez’s claim that he should *804have been granted a continuance is moot, because his case was in fact continued. *See Connolly v. Pension Ben. Guar. Corp.,*673 F.2d 1110, 1113 (9th Cir.1982); see *also Dudley v. Anderson (In re Dudley),*249 F.3d 1170, 1172-73 (9th Cir.2001).

(2) Mendoza-Martinez argues that because of the tragic events of September 11, 2001, a jury chosen that day could not have considered the alien smuggling charges against him in a fair and unbiased manner. However, he presented no evidence of a nexus between his case and any September 11th media coverage that could have biased a jury against him. *See United States v. Sherwood,*98 F.3d 402, 410 (9th Cir.1996).1 Moreover, Mendoza-Martinez failed to produce any evidence that the community had been saturated with prejudicial and inflammatory media coverage about his crime, or that the jurors evinced “actual partiality or hostility that could not be laid aside.” *Id.*at 410.2

On this record, then, we cannot conclude that the district court’s denial of the motion was an abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Garrett,*179 F.3d 1143, 1144-45 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. In fact, Mendoza-Martinez points to not a single news report in support of his claim.

2

. When the court asked counsel for Mendoza-Martinez whether there were any specific questions he wanted asked of the jury during *voir dire,*Mendoza-Martinez requested that the jury be asked whether, in view of the events of that day, the jury would be comfortable sitting on the case, and how they felt about a smuggling case that day. The court agreed to do so. Such *voir dire*was adequate to reveal any latent prejudice arising out of pre-trial publicity. *See United States v. Taylor,*693 F.2d 919, 923-24 (9th Cir.1982).