alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: Approximately 10:30 a.m., Wednesday, December 10, 1997, 
following a recess at the conclusion of the open meeting.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: December 3, 1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32015 Filed 12-3-97; 10:50 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32257]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt

Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the 
Reinvestment Application.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 9, 
1998, to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form and instructions should be directed to Vicki S. 
Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 
26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Reinvestment Application.
    OMB Number: 1535-0096.
    Form Number: PD F 1993.
    Abstract: The information is requested to support a request that 
proceeds of matured Series H savings bonds be reinvested in Series HH 
bonds.
    Current Actions: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Individuals.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 270,000.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 67,500.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-32257 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
```
#### Clarence R. TSUKARNO v. STATE.

No. 38154.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So.2d 25.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 5, 2012

d0227 

# Order

March 5, 2012

143869

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143869 COA: 305326 St. Clair CC: 10-000207-FC HARRY WILLIAM HARPER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 16, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 21
 Subsidiaries of Registrant
 State of
    
    PercentageCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    OwnershipCICA Life Insurance Company of America (CICA)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% DirectCitizens Academy, LLC
    
    Texas
    
    100% DirectCitizens National Life Insurance Company (CNLIC)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectComputing Technology, Inc.
(CTI)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% IndirectFuneral Homes of America, Inc.
(FHA)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectInsurance Investors, Inc. (III)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectIntegrity Capital Corporation (ICC)
    
    Indiana
    
    87% Direct 13% IndirectIntegrity Capital Insurance Company
(ICIC)
    
    Indiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Life Insurance Company (SPLIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Fire Insurance Company (SPFIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% Indirect
  47
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. David DENNIS, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections for the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-1009.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus dismissed.
#### William Frank JOHNS a/k/a Buddy Johns, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

James Ron Shelley, Public Defender; and Robert G. Kerrigan, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32(a)


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Con-way Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas W. Stotlar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Secion 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and

   (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Dated:  November 7, 2008




/s/  Douglas W. Stotlar
----------------------------
Name:  Douglas W. Stotlar
Title: Chief Executive Officer






                                                                Exhibit 32(b)

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Con-way Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen L. Bruffett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and

   (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Dated:  November 7, 2008


/s/ Stephen L. Bruffett
-----------------------------
Name:  Stephen L. Bruffett
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002



In
connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Yangtze River Development Limited (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”), Xiangyao Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Annual Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The
    information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
    of operations of the Company.



|By: | /s/
    Xiangyao Liu                                                 | 
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Xiangyao
    Liu                                                     | 
|    | Principal
                                         Executive Officer | 



Dated:
March 17, 2017
# ERA1 Quarterly Summary

# ERA1 Quarterly by Income Level

# ERA1 State & Local Expenditure

# ERA1 State & Local Households

# ERA2 Quarterly Summary

# ERA2 Quarterly by Income Level

# ERA2 State & Local Expenditure

# ERA2 State & Local Households
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1704
JAMES E. OSBORNE, Petitioner, versus ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order for the Benefits Review Board. (96-1656-BLA) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. Osborne, Petitioner Pro Se. Douglas Allan Smoot, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Edward Waldman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Osborne v. Island Creek Coal Co. , No. 96-1656-BLA (B.R.B. Mar.27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HHF Kentucky Date: October 1, 2018

A-1

SCHEDULE A

BASIC INFORMATION

Eligible Entity Information:

Name of the Eligible Entity: Kentucky Housing Corporation1

Corporate or other organizational form: independent, de jure Municipal Corporation 

Jurisdiction of organization: Kentucky

Notice Information:

HFA Information:

Name of HFA: Kentucky Housing Corporation1

Organizational form: independent, de jure Municipal Corporation

Date of Application: September 1, 2010

Date of Action Plan: September 1, 2010 

Notice Information:

Program Participation Cap: $207,192,837.00

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Original HHF Funds: N/A

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Unemployment HHF Funds: $55,588,050.00

Rounds 1-4 Funding Allocation: $148,901,875.00

Round 5 Funding Allocation: $58,290,962.00

Program Funds: $187,217,452.00

Permitted Expenses: $19,975,385.00

Closing Date: September 23, 2010

First Amendment Date: September 29, 2010

1 References in the Agreement to the term "HFA" shall mean the Kentucky Housing Corporation 

(“KHC”) in its capacity as HFA as such term is used in the Agreement; and references in the Agreement 

to the term "Eligible Entity" shall mean KHC, in its capacity as Eligible Entity as such term is used in the 

Agreement.
HHF Kentucky Date: October 1, 2018

A-2

Second Amendment Date: December 16, 2010

Third Amendment Date: March 31, 2011

Fourth Amendment Date: September 28, 2011

Fifth Amendment Date: May 3, 2012

Sixth Amendment Date: December 14, 2012

Seventh Amendment Date: October 10, 2014

Eighth Amendment Date: October 28, 2015

Ninth Amendment Date: April 1, 2016

Tenth Amendment Date: June 1, 2016

Eligible Entity Depository Account Information: See account information set forth in the

Depository Account Control Agreement 

between Treasury and Eligible Entity 

regarding the HHF Program.
256 La. 798

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Earl ANDREWS and Carley Bluford v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50849.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1970.

In re: Earl Andrews and Carley Bluford applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant an exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Small Business Administration Revocation of License of Small 
Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of New York, dated August 4, 
1997, the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes 
the license of Rainbow Bridge Capital Corporation, a New York 
corporation, to function as a small business investment company under 
the Small Business Investment Company License No.
02/02-5297 issued to Rainbow Bridge Capital Corporation on June 12, 
1980 and said license is hereby declared null and void as of December 
2, 1997.

United States Small Business Administration

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-32196 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2327 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2327

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the time period for 
  eligibility under Survivors' And Dependents' Educational Assistance 
               Program of Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2021

   Ms. Mace introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the time period for 
  eligibility under Survivors' And Dependents' Educational Assistance 
               Program of Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIME PERIOD FOR ELIGIBILITY UNDER SURVIVORS' AND DEPENDENTS' 
              EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    Section 3512(b)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or (D)'' and 
        inserting ``(D), or (E)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(E) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), an eligible person referred 
to in that subparagraph who is made eligible on or after August 1, 
2022, may be afforded educational assistance under this chapter at any 
time after such date.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40110

Summary Calendar

ENRIQUE MORENO SANCHES

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE; DICK LEONARD; G RUDOLPH

GARZA, JR; ARMANDO FLORES

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:94-CV-387

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Enrique Moreno Sanches, federal prisoner # 61759-079, appeals the

district court’s denial of his FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion to reopen, which was

filed more than 11 years after the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.

He argues thatthe district court erred by construing his motion as based on Rule

60(b)(1); instead, Sanches argues that his motion was based on Rule 60(b)(6),

which he asserts does not have a time limit.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 3, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40110

2

We conclude that, because Sanches’s motion is untimely under either

subsection, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.

A motion based on Rule 60(b)(1) must be made not more than one year after the

entry of judgment; a motion based on Rule 60(b)(6) must be brought “within a

reasonable time.” FED. R. CIV. P. 60(c)(1). It is undisputed that Sanches’s

motion was not filed until more than 11 years after the district court’s dismissal

of his § 1983 complaint; therefore, it clearly was untimely under subsection

(b)(1). We also conclude that Sanches has not shown that his motion was filed

within a reasonable time or that extraordinary circumstances exist that would

warrant relief under Rule 60(b)(6). See Hess v. Cockrell, 281 F.3d 212, 216 (5th

Cir. 2002); Edwards v. City of Houston, 78 F.3d 983, 995 (5th Cir. 1996)

(en banc).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2220 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2220

   To amend title 40, United States Code, to modify the treatment of 
  certain bargain-price options to purchase at less than fair market 
                     value, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

    Mr. Guest (for himself, Mr. Webster of Florida, and Mr. Pence) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 40, United States Code, to modify the treatment of 
  certain bargain-price options to purchase at less than fair market 
                     value, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON DISCOUNTED PURCHASE OPTIONS.

    Section 585 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d) Any bargain-price option to purchase at less than fair market 
value contained in any lease agreement entered into on or after January 
1, 2021, pursuant to this section may be exercised only to the extent 
specifically provided for in subsequent appropriation Acts or other 
Acts of Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```