alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard N. Feist
III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

May 16, 2005


/s/ Howard N. Feist III
-----------------------
Howard N. Feist III
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 31.3



Certification Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, James J. Cassidy, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on
Form 10-K/A of Electromed, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report.



|                       |  |     |  |                                
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2012 |  | By: |  | /s/ James J. Cassidy           
|                       |  |     |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Interest of D. G., a Child. In the Interest of S. L. M., a Child.

Nos. 73-223, 73-224.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
September 24, 2021

Subject: RentReliefRI Approval for Security Deposit and 1st Month’s Rent

Dear Jane Smith,

We are in receipt of your recent application to RentReliefRI (Case #555555). Your application has 

been successfully submitted and you qualify for assistance with a security deposit and 1st month’s 

rent (up to three months forward facing rent total) pending your ability to secure a unit. 

You will have ninety (90) days from the date of this letter to secure a unit utilizing this assistance. 

You should print out this letter and show to a potential landlord as evidence of your ability to 

provide a required security deposit and first month’s rent. A signed lease and landlord agreement to 

participate in the program will be required in order to execute payment to the landlord. This 

approval is subject to funding and we reserve the right to re-evaluate income and COVID need. 

Please have a prospective landlord call 855-608-8756 to learn more about the terms of the program.

Sincerely,

Rental Assistance Program Manager
OFFICE OF THE AlT’ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bonoroble 8. C. Branson 

Comdssioner, Dapartaent of' BenkIng 

Austin, reacaa 

lo.hare your le 

tho parpose of 

loa of aloptiag 

u&or 8.8. Ho. 

6# Aaa of lQaQ* 

etlag executed by all *tookadd oorporatloa. 

A OertiPied copy OS the resothe stockboldors of the l&r- 

& Employee Industzlal Bank, 

adopttfng the powore provided ior under 

6. E. so. 268. 

'4. An af+fidavit of all the 6tockholders of the Ksrcbante 0 Employes Industrial Bank to the effeof that the en- 
552 

Hon. F* C. BmnBon - Pago 2 

tire runrunt uf' eei(L capital stook of 

eai&tor~rationaas eubearS.md and 

aatua11g p&i in fn aaah. 

"5. A oert.iPl.oate of the b&rchDntaE:P~legf3a kaa.Istria3u~ 

06rtiqrsns. the mloption of the e&IAtianal pev5m ae pm~idod for uear 

8. B. NO. 268, b&n&$ it copy of the 

aertifloato of authovity esaeutoabg 

aw.3 ae zumd.ng Goszaissioner of this 

state, oereifying mat the ftwahante 

&&qloyeslnBu8~rXalPFulkis&Puly 

lriaorpwdi~, snd ds antitled ,*o 8xeraiso, not only the pmer5 granted 

to it luxler its ol%giat%l lat%rter, 

but Aa adrllffoa tbamto, all the 

pouars proviaoa for under 8. B . 268. 

'I hare mada the investigation 

ElYl oonolwle that the elltlre anw?mt 

of tho Ca@81 stock of saU Wank 

hrra been poia in in f'nll in sabh. 

*I, Has the Ee~haxrbs dt Sa8" 

oyoo fndustriElBanlt&i 

eoti?elp aaoptd the a&IStonal 

31" 

or0 proeaea ior 

and au orieed UrxlQr 6. B. 

No. 088, 46th L5gitialatnre, 

A&s of the LO&F$8lEtur8 of 

t&m state of TexaSI hJnmaatory of hrtiol% 646, 8oQtLon 

2, Title 18, of the Revimd 

Giztut-sa of Texas? 
%o 4~0 exfube~ the instrilmnts rzforrd 

to in your lottor an d attoohod as esllibits thereto, 

anrl fIna the sm to bo in ;xopsr Porn anA =ltogothor 

sufficient for the lxqmes intended. 

This jlepartmnt is of the opi'nion Xcrchantr 

:: alployoG Itiustrinl EOICL'; hno cffectiooly C.&GptOfi 

th0 dt,iG!ULl pOVol?s FOVidGz Oti nuthorizod t0 SOoallod tirrie Plan Baum Luxler 6. E. 206, 46th Logisloeuro. 

The 6epY‘tmnt is further of tho Opinion 

that the kiQrGhE?lt6 & &Jplo3-'os lzdustrinl &ml; having 

&opt&I thOs0 power6 is noe a lo@lly organize6 bank 

u&w the laws of this Stetz, dth power, mm& others, 

*to rcoeivo mrm3~ on tl= d~pOsits.a 

Truotin~ t&at m;ic Fill lxlvc ansaerod YGUr 

puostions satlsfectorily, we are 

OS-A!H
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32412]



[[Page 65203]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 15


Changes in Reporting Levels for Large Trader Reports

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Final rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is correcting an 
error in reports by large traders previously published in the Federal 
Register on November 17, 1997 (62 FR 61226).

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 17, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lamont L. Reese, Division of Economic Analysis, Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20581, (202) 418-5310.

Correction

    In the final rule, FR Doc. No. 97-29995, beginning on page 61226 in 
the Federal Register issue of November 17, 1997, make the following 
correction:


Sec. 15.03  [Corrected]

    On page 61227, in the third column, in Sec. 15.03, in the table, in 
the column entitled ``Quantity,'' the fourth line reflecting the 
quantity 500,000 for the commodity of oats (bushels), should be deleted 
and replaced with the quantity 300,000.

    Dated: December 8, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-32412 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### Antonio MORALES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-628.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 1970.

Mosca & Barone, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reilly v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 796; Fountain v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 738; Gispert v. State, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 596. See also Zicca v. State, Third District Court of Appeal, 232 So.2d 414, opinion filed March 3, 1970.
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

**GIBSON**** ****ENERGY**** ****ULC**** ****SUBSIDIARIES**

 

All subsidiaries are 100% owned unless otherwise stated.

 

GEP Midstream Finance Corp. (Alberta, Canada)

Moose Jaw Refinery ULC (Alberta, Canada)

Moose Jaw Refinery Partnership (Alberta, Canada)

Canwest Propane ULC (Alberta, Canada)

Canwest Propane Partnership (Alberta, Canada)

MP Energy ULC (Alberta, Canada)

MP Energy Partnership (Alberta, Canada)

GEP ULC (Alberta, Canada)

Gibson Energy Partnership (Alberta, Canada)

Link Petroleum Services Ltd. (British Columbia, Canada)

Link Petroleum, Inc. (Washington, USA)

Gibson Energy (U.S.) Inc. (Delaware, USA)

Southern Valley Energy, LLC (North Dakota, USA) (50%)

Gibson GCC Inc. (Alberta, Canada)

Bridge Creek Trucking Ltd. (Saskatchewan, Canada)

Johnstone Tank Trucking Ltd. (Saskatchewan, Canada)

Chief Hauling Contractors ULC (Alberta, Canada)

Gibson Finance Ltd. (Alberta, Canada)

Gibson (U.S.) Holdco Corp. (Delaware, USA)

Gibson (U.S.) Acquisitionco Corp. (Delaware, USA)

Gibson (U.S.) Finco Corp. (Delaware, USA)

Taylor Companies, LLC (Delaware, USA)

TPG Transport, LLC (Delaware, USA)

TPG Leasing, LLC (Delaware, USA)

Taylor Transfer Services, LLC (Texas, USA)

Taylor Gas Liquids, LLC (Texas, USA)

Taylor Land Holdings, LLC (Montana, USA)

 

1

----
Exhibit 11.1 CPI Corp.
Computation of Per Common Share Earnings (Loss) - Diluted(Unaudited) 12 Weeks Ended
  
  24 Weeks Endedthousands, except
share and per share data
  
  July 23,
  2005
  
  July 24,
  2004
  
  July 23,
  2005
  
  July 24,
  2004Diluted:Net loss applicable to common shares:From continuing operations
  
  $
  (3,017
  )
  $
  (6,519
  )
  $
  (5,075
  )
  $
  (14,168
  )From discontinued operations
  
  
  
  
  
  (2,588
  )
  
  
  
  
  (3,737
  )Net loss
  
  $
  (3,017
  )
  $
  (9,107
  )
  $
  (5,075
  )
  $
  (17,905
  )Shares:Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding
  
  
  18,489,481
  
  
  18,413,448
  
  
  18,469,316
  
  
  18,389,738Shares issuable under employee stock plans
  - weighted average
  
  
  
  *
  
  
  **
  
  
  ***
  
  
  ****Diluted effect of exercise of certain stock
  options
  
  
  
  *
  
  
  **
  
  
  ***
  
  
  ****Less: Treasury stock - weighted
average
  
  
  (10,639,543
  )
  
  (10,425,262
  )
  
  (10,639,543
  )
  
  (10,345,359
  )Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding
  
  
  7,849,938
  
  
  7,988,186
  
  
  7,829,773
  
  
  8,044,379Net loss per common and common equivalent
  shares:From continuing operations
  
  $
  (0.38
  )
  $
  (0.82
  )
  $
  (0.65
  )
  $
  (1.76
  )From discontinued operations
  
  
  
  
  
  (0.32
  )
  
  
  
  
  (0.46
  )Net loss
  
  $
  (0.38
  )
  $
  (1.14
  )
  $
  (0.65
  )
  $
  (2.22
  )  *
  The effect
  of stock options in the amount of 21,525 shares and 17,003 shares issuable under
  employee stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.**
  The effect
  of stock options in the amount of 12,211 shares and 17,003 shares issuable
  under employee stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.***
  The effect of stock options
  in the amount of 15,351 shares and 17,003 shares issuable under employee
  stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.****
  The effect of stock options
  in the amount of 36,526 shares and 17,226 shares issubale under employee
  stock plans were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)


I, George Boyer, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of Greektown Superholdings, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;





4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;





5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  March 25, 2011
/s/ George BoyerGeorge BoyerPrincipal Executive Officer


- 100 -
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Washington; Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 97-077. Applicant: University of Washington, 
Seattle, WA 98195-7940. Instrument: Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer, 
Model DELTA<SUP>plus</SUP>. Manufacturer: Finnigan MAT, Germany. 
Intended Use: See notice at 62 FR 52685, October 9, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides a magnetic 
sector mass analyzer coupled to a gas chromatograph with in-line 
combustion of the gas effluent for measurement with samples down to the 
sub-nanomole level. This capability is pertinent to the applicant's 
intended purposes and we know of no other instrument or apparatus of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being 
manufactured in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-32465 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 31.1

﻿

﻿

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

﻿

I, Andreas R. Rouvé, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

|  | 1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (the “registrant”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017; |
|--|----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: January 23, 2018

 

﻿

| ﻿                  |
|---------------------------|
| /s/ Andreas R. Rouvé |
| Andreas R. Rouvé     |
| Chief Executive Officer   |

﻿

----
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04331A019
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2010-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
#### Readus R. SHEPARD v. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38460.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) of OFS Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jeffrey A. Cerny, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





| |       | /s/ Jeffrey A. Cerny
| | ----- | --------------------
| | Name: | Jeffrey A. Cerny    
| | Date: | March 15, 2016