alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            6035
<SECURITIES>                                      8000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3799
<ALLOWANCES>                                        53
<INVENTORY>                                       9305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 28569
<PP&E>                                            4018
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3920
<BONDS>                                             78
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1173
<OTHER-SE>                                       25074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32349
<SALES>                                           5925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5925
<CGS>                                             2842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (101)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    755
<INCOME-TAX>                                       280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       475
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
#### John LYNCH and Jeanette Lynch, his wife, et al., Petitioners, v. PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM, INC., a Florida corporation, Respondents.

No. 41865.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 20, 1972.

Byrd V. Duke, Jr., Miami, for petitioners.

Norman A. Coll and Shepard King, of McCarthy, Steel, Hector & Davis, Miami, for respondents.

DREW, Justice (Retired).

We originally granted certiorari here on the assertion in the petition for certiorari that the decision of the District Court of Appeal, 254 So.2d 371, holding that a franchise tax levied by the City of North Miami on the respondent utility company, which serves other areas, may be passed on to its customers in the municipality of North Miami was in direct conflict with previous decisions of this Court holding that taxes must be levied against and paid by the person or class authorized by clear and specific terms of a legislative act.

Upon further consideration of the cases cited for conflict and after able oral argument of counsel before the Court, we have determined that these cases relied on by petitioners involved taxes of an entirely different character from those imposed on this public utility. Under the factual situation revealed by the record here, the District Court’s conclusion, and the cases cited in support thereof, are correct. Such conclusion leaves this Court bereft of jurisdiction; therefore,

Certiorari was improvidently granted and the writ heretofore issued is quashed, and certiorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
August 15, 2011

Adam Clark Air Quality Planning Unit US EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop St. Denver, CO 80202

Dear Adam:

On December 17, 2009, the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission approved a Clean Air Act section 175A(b) second 10-year maintenance plan for the Colo rado Springs Carbon Monoxide Attainment/Maintenance Area. This second 10-year plan was submitted to the EPA on March 31, 2010, and was prepared in compliance

with the EPA's Carbon Monoxide Limite d Maintenance Plan (LMP) policy.

The State of Colorado is providing additional material to clarify and supplement the Air Pollution Control Division's (APCD) Technical Support Document (TSD) that was included with the Colorado Springs Carbon

Monoxide LMP.

The December 17, 2009 version of the TSD inadvert ently provided only a 2007 annual emission inventory for carbon monoxide in the Colorado Springs Attainment/M aintenance Area. The en closed TSD serves as a supplement and is in addition to the original December 17, 2009 version of the TSD. The emission inventory in this supplemental TSD represents 2007 average daily winter conditions, and was calculated by the APCD in 2009 and included in the Colorado Springs Ca rbon Monoxide LMP submitted in 2010.

This supplemental TSD also provides further explanati on of the ways in which the original 2009 TSD, which provided an annual emission inventory, was used to ca lculate many of the daily emission inventory totals provided in the Colorado Springs Carbon Monoxide LMP.

Sincerely,

Christopher Dann

Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Department of Pub lic Health and Environment

cc: Michael Silverstein, CAQCC
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Washington 

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Washington over

$75 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Industrial Credit Union of Whatcom County Bellingham CDFI $ 14,000,000 

Newrizons Federal Credit Union Hoquiam CDFI $ 100,000 

O Bee Credit Union Lacey CDFI $ 10,000,000 

Peninsula Community Federal Credit Union Shelton CDFI $ 4,900,000 

Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union Seattle CDFI $ 46,094,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2013

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/27 12/31 1/3 40.00 32.00 28.00 99.00 1.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 1/2 1/7 1/10 40.00 32.00 28.00 25.00 124.00 1.00

1/10 1/14 1/17 35.00 32.00 28.00 99.00 -4.00

1/17 1/22 1/24 30.00 32.00 28.00 99.00 -9.00

1/24 1/28 1/31 30.00 32.00 28.00 100.00 -10.00

1/31 2/4 2/7 45.00 32.00 28.00 25.00 126.00 4.00

2/7 2/11 2/14 45.00 32.00 28.00 95.00 10.00

2/14 2/19 2/21 45.00 32.00 28.00 90.00 15.00

2/21 2/25 2/28 45.00 32.00 28.00 90.00 15.00

2/28 3/4 3/7 45.00 34.00 28.00 25.00 131.00 1.00

3/7 3/11 3/14 45.00 36.00 28.00 105.00 4.00

3/14 3/18 3/21 45.00 36.00 28.00 105.00 4.00

3/21 3/25 3/28 45.00 36.00 28.00 105.00 4.00

1404.00 1368.00 36.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

69-DAY BILL 2/13 2/15 35.00 35.00

Matures 4/25

55-DAY BILL 2/21 2/22 30.00 30.00

Matures 4/18

CMB Funds: 65.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

3-year Note 1/3 1/8 1/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 1/3 1/9 1/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 1/3 1/10 1/15 13.00 0.00 41.55 24.45

10-year TIPS 1/10 1/17 1/31 15.00 0.00

2-year Note 1/17 1/22 1/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 1/17 1/23 1/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 1/17 1/24 1/31 29.00 0.00 51.40 62.60

3-year note 2/7 2/12 2/15 32.00 0.00

10-year note 2/7 2/13 2/15 24.00 0.00

30-year bond 2/7 2/14 2/15 16.00 0.00 64.00 8.00

30-year TIPS 2/7 2/14 2/28 10.00 1.00

2-year note 2/21 2/25 2/28 35.00 0.00

5-year note 2/21 2/26 2/28 35.00 0.00

7-year note 2/21 2/27 2/28 29.00 0.00 54.71 54.29

3-year Note 3/7 3/12 3/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 3/7 3/13 3/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Note ® 3/7 3/14 3/15 13.00 0.00 40.47 25.53

10-year TIPS ® 3/14 3/21 3/28 13.00 0.00

2-year Note 3/21 3/26 4/1 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 3/21 3/27 4/1 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 3/21 3/28 4/1 29.00 0.00 57.14 54.86

539.00 309.27 229.73

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 331
- Local 707 Notification Letter
- 201606241629
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Higher One Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Dean Hatton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 23, 2011 |  | /s/ Dean Hatton                                  
|                         |  | Dean Hatton President and
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Grady W. TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-478.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 4, 1969.

Grady W. Tucker, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. *5261396,18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
#### Truett Banks SEWELL and Margaret Dorothy Sewell, his wife, Appellants, v. Clayton W. COLEMAN, Appellee.

No. 69-278.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

July 1, 1969.

Appeal quashed.
[737 NYS2d 719]

#### In the Matter of David A. Gaesser, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Seventh Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

December 21, 2001

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Daniel A. Drake, Principal Counsel, Seventh Judicial District Grievance Committee,*Rochester, for petitioner.

*Francis B. Mahan,*Rochester, for respondent.

*59OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on March 16, 1995, and maintains an office for the practice of law in Rochester. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of professional misconduct arising from his real estate practice. Respondent filed an answer denying material allegations of the petition and raising matters in mitigation. A Referee was appointed to conduct a hearing. Prior to the hearing, the parties executed a stipulation resolving outstanding issues of fact. After a hearing on mitigation, the Referee filed a report, which the Grievance Committee moves to confirm.

Respondent’s admissions establish that respondent failed to supervise adequately a paralegal in his employ, neglected four real estate cases by failing in each case to discharge an existing mortgage in a timely manner, failed to maintain client funds, and failed to maintain required bank account records.

We confirm the findings of fact made by the Referee and conclude that respondent violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (a) (7) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [7]) — engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer;

DR 1-104 (c) (22 NYCRR 1200.5 [c]) — failing to supervise adequately the work of a nonlawyer employee;

DR 6-101 (a) (3) (22 NYCRR 1200.30 [a] [3]) — neglecting legal matters entrusted to him;

DR 9-102 (b) (1) (22 NYCRR 1200.46 [b] [1]) — failing to maintain funds of a client in a special account separate from his business or personal accounts; and

DR 9-102 (d) (22 NYCRR 1200.46 [d]) — failing to maintain required records of bank accounts.

We have considered the matters submitted by respondent in mitigation. We note, however, that the misconduct of respondent entailed his failure to supervise a paralegal whom he continued to employ after learning that the paralegal and another attorney had engaged in misconduct similar to the misconduct herein *(see, Matter of Bushorr,*274 AD2d 107) and after the paralegal had admitted to him that she had forged checks drawn on an attorney trust account. Moreover, as a result of respondent’s failing to maintain and preserve client funds, more than $110,000 in client funds remain unaccounted for. Accordingly, after consideration of all the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended for a *60period of three years and until further order of the Court. Additionally, we direct respondent to make restitution in accordance with the order entered herewith.

Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Scudder and Burns, JJ., concur. Order of suspension and restitution entered.
#### WROBBEL v. WALDA.

No. 38347.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 217 So.2d 340.
#### Joseph NEUVOHNER and Edlie Neuvohner, his wife, et al., Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-918.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 20, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Ronaldo Reyes       | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 1761 East St. Andrew Place           | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Santa Ana, CA  92705                 | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Darnella Tinnel-Crawford       | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700               | 500 Woodward Ave |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | Mail code:  MI-01-20-TRES |
|                                            | Detroit, MI 48226 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2016-3 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00548-CV

M&M Orthodontics P.A.; Harlingen Family Dentistry; Westmoreland Dental, P.A.;

Westmoreland Dental of Garland, P.C.; Westmoreland Dental & Orthodontics, P.A.;

Scottie H. Nguyen, DDS; and Westmoreland Dental, P.C., LLC, Appellants

v.

Texas Health and Human Services Commission; Dr. Kyle Janek, In His Official Capacity

as the Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission;

Carole Hurley, Chief Administrative Law Judge for the Texas Health and Human Services

Commission; Judge Keith Grantham of the Appeals Division Texas Health and Human

Services Commission; and Rick Gilpin, Administrative Law Judge of the Appeals Division

Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345 JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-14-001109, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellants Westmoreland Dental, P.A., Westmoreland Dental of Garland, P.C.,

Westmoreland Dental & Orthodontics, P.A., Scottie H. Nguyen, DDS, and Westmoreland Dental,

P.C., LLC (collectively,Westmoreland) have filed an unopposed motion requesting that their appeals

be dismissed. We grant the motion and dismiss Westmoreland’s appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(1).

We further amend the style of the case, as follows, to correctly reflect the remaining

parties to the appeal:
M&M Orthodontics P.A. and Harlingen Family Dentistry, Appellants

v.

Texas Health and Human Services Commission; Dr. Kyle Janek, In His Official Capacity as the

Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission; Carole Hurley,

Chief Administrative Law Judge for the Texas Health and Human Services Commission;

Judge Keith Grantham of the Appeals Division Texas Health and Human Services Commission;

and Rick Gilpin, Administrative Law Judge of the Appeals Division Texas Health and Human

Services Commission, Appellees

It is ordered this October 16, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

2
Exhibit 32(a)


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report  on Form 10-Q of CNF Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas W.
Stotlar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  *1350, as adopted pursuant to *906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

   (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.


Dated:  August 5, 2005



/s/ Douglas W. Stotlar
--------------------------
Name:  Douglas W. Stotlar
Title:  Chief Executive Officer






                                                                Exhibit 32(b)

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CNF Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Schick,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
*1350, as adopted pursuant to *906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

   (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

   (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.


Dated:  August 5, 2005


/s/ Kevin Schick
---------------------------
Name:  Kevin Schick
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Landing Gear For Flame Wheel Instruction 

JXl9<$QiBI~~~ 

M2.5x8 (Spes) 

Single Weight /•1'0 : lSg 

Single Weight /•1'0 : lSg 

Cl2013 DJIInnovations. All Righta Reaerved. www.dji-innovetion$.COm
EXHIBIT 11
                         CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                            AND SUBSIDIARIES


                     Computation of Earnings Per Share

                                      Three Months Ended
                                  ______________________________
                                   March 31            March 31
                                     1997               1996
                                  _____________    _____________

Computation of share totals
 used in computing earnings
 per share:

Weighted average number of
 shares outstanding               1,489,590          1,484,070
 (Adjusted for stock dividend
  May 3, 1996)

Primary average shares

 a - Outstanding                  1,489,590          1,484,070

Incremental shares arising
 from outstanding stock options      17,846             12,861
                                 ______________    ____________
 b - Totals                       1,507,436          1,496,931
                                 ==============    ============
 c - Net Income                  $2,626,333         $3,309,391
                                 ==============    ============
Net Income Per Share
 Primary - c/a                       $ 1.76            $ 2.23
                                 ==============    ============
Net Income Per Share
assuming full dilution - c/b         $ 1.74            $ 2.21
                                 ==============    ============