alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.25

February 23,
2011

Kurt
Hoffman
5425 NE 85th Street
Seattle, WA 98115

Dear
Kurt:

This
Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of February [    ], 2011 and effective as of
April [    ], 2011 (the "Effective Date"), is made by and between Kurt Hoffman (the
"Executive") and Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. and any of its subsidiaries and affiliates as may employ Executive from time to time
(collectively, and together with any successor thereto, the "Company"). Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall be void and of no force and effect if within
20 days of the Effective Date the Company is not, acting reasonably and in good faith, satisfied with the results of a background check on the Executive.

RECITALS

A.    The
Company desires to engage the Executive to perform services pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

B.    The
Executive desires to provide services to the Company on the terms herein provided.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the covenants set forth below, the parties agree as follows:

1.Certain Definitions.





---





2.Employment.



2

---





3.Compensation and Related Matters.



3

---





4.Termination.

The
Executive's employment may be terminated by the Company or the Executive, as applicable, without any breach of this Agreement under the following
circumstances:



4

---





5.Severance Payments.



5

---











6.Restrictive Covenants.



6

---





7

---





7.Assignment and Successors.



8.Governing Law.



9.Notices.





10.Counterparts.



8

---



11.Entire Agreement.



12.Amendments; Waivers.



13.No Inconsistent Actions.



14.Construction.



15.Arbitration.



9

---





16.Validity; Enforcement.



17.Withholding



18.Warranty of Noninterference.



19.Indemnification and Insurance.



20.Employee Acknowledgement



10

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written.

Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc.By

/s/ Eric K. Yeaman Eric K. Yeaman
Its President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kurt Hoffman Kurt Hoffman


11

---



QuickLinks
TS-ASLT40/50 

Attachment #9

Pt. 2, Sec. B 

Additional Information on the Absence of Tank Truck Cleaning Operations at Road 

Construction Sites
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDDIE WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 612 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Trunkbow International Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Li Qiang, the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Li QiangLi QiangChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




March 31, 2011
#### The FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN PLANT CITY, Appellant, v. McJUNKIN CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 68-651.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 26, 1969.

Robert S. Edwards, of Edwards *&*Sawyer, Plant City, for appellant.

E. Snow Martin, Jr., of Martin & Martin, Lakeland, for appellee.

*540PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maury v. Toledo Logging Co., 163 Wash. 563, 1 P.2d 896 (1931); Potter v. Whitten, 170 Mo.App. 108, 155 S.W. 80 (1913); Eau Claire National Bank v. Chippewa Valley Bank, 124 Wis. 520, 102 N.W. 1068 (1905).

HOBSON, C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Alberto ALMEIDA and Sheryl Almeida, his wife, Appellants, v. Ted M. TRUSHIN et al., Appellees.

No. 76-642.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 4, 1977.

John R. Young, Hamilton, James, Merkle & Young, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Sam Daniels and Bruner, Moss, Cohen & Rodgers, Miami, for appellees-Harbor Lounge and Southern Caterers.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS, J., and DRIVER, B. J., Associate Judge, concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially:

The appellants, plaintiffs below, suffered an adverse summary judgment in a cause of action predicated on the alleged negligence of the appellees in leaving an automobile unattended with the keys in the ignition. The automobile was subsequently stolen and involved in an accident with the appellants.

The cases in Florida have uniformly held that the intervening criminal act of theft breaks any causative chain between the original negligent act of leaving the keys in the car and the subsequent damages incurred in an accident. See *Vining v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.,*330 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A.1976) and cases cited therein. Because the Florida Supreme Court has never passed on the issue, the Third District Court of Appeals certified the decision in *Vining*to the Supreme Court. The same issue now faces this Court and while we must affirm on the authorities cited above, I would also certify the issue to the Supreme Court.
Exhibit 12.1

COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  EXHIBIT 12.1COMPUTATION OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

The following table sets forth the ratio of earnings to fixed charges of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002, computed by dividing net fixed charges (interest expense on all debt plus the interest element (one-third) of operating leases)
into earnings (earnings before income taxes and fixed charges).

|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|Net (loss) earnings                      
|Income tax (benefit) expense             
|Interest expense                         
|Interest portion of rental expense       
|                                         
|Earnings available to cover fixed charges
|                                         
|Fixed charges:                           
|                                         
|                                         
|                                         
|                                         
|                                         
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       
|                                         
|                                         

---



QuickLinks
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

d0126 

# Order

January 29, 2010

140238-9

TAMMY K. BONNER, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140238-9 COA: 288733; 291202 Macomb Circuit Court Family RICHARD K. BONNER, Division: 20 06-002201-DM Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32390]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 10, 1997.
    Time: 12 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Jean G. Noronha, Parklawn, Room 9C-26, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-6470.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: December 5, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-32390 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
#### Roger LOUNSBURY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 5, 1973.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Russell H. McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Phillip F. MARESCA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 25, 1969.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1002

___________________________

LaRonda Phox

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

NCO Financial Systems, Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: May 18, 2015

 Filed: May 21, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

LaRonda Phox appeals the district court’s adverse grant ofsummary judgment

1

in her pro se action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection

The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

1

Western District of Missouri.
Practices Act. Upon a careful, de novo review of the record and consideration of the

parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was properly

granted. See Menard, Inc. v. Dial-Columbus, LLC, 781 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir. 2015)

(standard of review). Further, we decline to consider the new issues Phox raised for

the first time in her appellate reply brief. See White v. Smith, 696 F.3d 740, 749 n.8

(8th Cir. 2012). 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
#### Robert Stephen YOKEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2003.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Del O’NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1970.

Leroy H. Moe of Varón & Stanl, Hollywood, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*390PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN, and REED, JJ„ concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of SemGroup Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert N. Fitzgerald, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  June 21, 2012

 

 
|   | By:                                                 | /s/ Robert N. Fitzgerald |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|   | Robert N. Fitzgerald                                |
|   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial   Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3184]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Availability of Draft Guidelines for Prevention of Opportunistic 
Infections in HIV-Infected Persons

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of a draft document 
entitled ``1997 USPHS/IDSA Guidelines for Prevention of Opportunistic 
Infections in HIV-Infected Persons,'' prepared by the Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health 
(NIH), and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), for 
review and comment.

DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments on this draft document 
must be received on or before March 12, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the draft 1997 USPHS/IDSA Guidelines 
for Prevention of Opportunistic Infections must be submitted to the 
Division of HIV/AIDS, Technical Information and Communications Branch, 
Mailstop E-49, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 
30333; telephone (404) 639-2076, FAX (404) 639-2007. Written comments 
on this draft document should be sent to the same address for receipt 
by March 12, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, 
Surveillance, and Epidemiology, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB 
Prevention, Mailstop E-49, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
Atlanta GA 30333; telephone (404) 639-2076, FAX (404) 639-2007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Opportunistic infections (OIs) constitute a 
major cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected persons. The 
draft Guidelines, prepared by the CDC, the NIH, and the IDSA in 
consultation with representatives from numerous Federal and non-Federal 
agencies and community groups, represent a comprehensive approach to 
prevention of OIs in HIV-infected persons and constitute a revision of 
the guidelines published in 1995. They include recommendations 
pertinent to 17 major OIs, or groups of OIs, according to (1) 
Prevention of exposure, (2) prevention of disease (first occurrence), 
and (3) prevention of disease recurrence.

    Dated: February 4, 1997.
Joseph R. Carter,
Acting Associate Director for Management and Operations, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-3184 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Sanitized

ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

SMILES : [ ]

CHEM : [ ]

CAS Num: [ ]

ChemID1:

MOL FOR: [ ]

MOL WT : [ ]

Log Kow: 2.665 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Log Kow: (User Entered)

Log Kow: (PhysProp DB exp value

- for comparison only)

Melt Pt: (User Entered for Wat Sol estimate)

Melt Pt: (deg C, Ph ysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol estimate)

Wat Sol: 61 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

Wat Sol: (User Entered)

Wat Sol: (PhysProp DB exp value)

--------------------------------------

Values used to Generate ECOSAR Pr ofile

--------------------------------------

Log Kow: 2.665 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Wat Sol: 61 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

------------------------------------------------

Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

------------------------------------------------

No Data Available

--------------------------------------

ECOSAR v1.1 Class

- specific Estimations

--------------------------------------

Neutral Organics

Predicted

ECOSAR Class Organism Duration E nd Pt mg/L (ppm)

========================= ============ ======= ===== = ==== ===== == = ==========

Neutral Orga nics : Fish 96

- hr LC50 34.679

Neutral Organics : Daphnid 48

- hr LC50 20.937

Neutral Organics : Green Algae 96

- hr EC50 20.103

Neutral Organics : Fish ChV 3.644

Neutral Organics : Daphnid ChV 2.422

Neutral Organics : Green Algae ChV 6.036

Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) 96

- hr LC50 43.832Neutral Organics : Mysid 96

- hr LC50 20.762

Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) ChV 7.140

Neutral Organics : Mysid (SW) ChV 1.474

Neutral Organics : Earthworm 14

- day LC50 247.661 *

Note: * = asterisk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough to measure this predicted effect. If

the effect level exceeds the water solubility by 10X, ty pically no effects at saturation (NES) are reported.

------------------------------

Class Specific LogKow Cut

- Offs

------------------------------

If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut

- offs presented below, then no

effects at saturation are expected for those endpoints.

Neutral Organics:

----------------

Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fish 96

- hr LC50; Daphnid LC50, Mysid LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.0 (Earthworm LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50)

Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6580

CASEY RAFAEL TYLER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JOHN SAPPER; MS. LEARY , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III, District Judge. ( 5:21

- ct

- 03003

- D )

Submitted : July 30, 2024 Decided: August 16, 2024

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
Casey Rafael Tyler , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6580 Doc: 18 Filed: 08/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district court’s order s granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and granting in part and denying in part Tyler’s motion to alter or amend the judgment in his action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc to 2000cc

- 5 . We have
reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court ’s judgment and orders

. Tyler v. Sapper , No. 5:21

- ct

- 02002

- D (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2023; June 14, 2023) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6580 Doc: 18 Filed: 08/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      128
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,746
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,225,039
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,111,675
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,318,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,746
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,916)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### FELIX SPECIAL SAUSAGES, INC., Felix P. Matzat and Hedwig Matzat, Appellants, v. PBR ENGINEERS & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 20, 1970.

William E. Weller, of Rose & Weller, Cocoa Beach, for appellants.

Robert T. Westman, of Stromire & Westman, Cocoa, for appellee.

OWEN, Judge.

In supplemental proceedings brought by a judgment creditor, the court found from the evidence that the corporate defendant had transferred assets to its officers and stockholders, contrary to the provisions of F.S.1967, Section 608.55, F.S.A. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff judgment creditor against the corporate officers and stockholders to whom the assets had been transferred. The appeal is from that judgment.

A review of the evidence with all reasonable inferences and deductions capable of being drawn therefrom considered in the light most favorable to the factual conclusions of the trial court, Bowen v. Everett, Fla.App.1967, 205 So.2d 536, discloses substantial competent evidence supporting such conclusions. The transfer of corporate assets to officers and directors of the corporation in violation of F.S.1967, Section 608,-55, F.S.A., subjects such transferees to per*543sonal liability to the corporate creditor. See Alberts v. Schneiderman, Fla.App. 1966, 182 So.2d SO. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and TJOFLAT, GERALD B., Associate Judge, concur.