alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                APPENDIX A TO ITEM 601(c) OF REGULATION S-K
                    COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
                         ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         495,167
<SECURITIES>                                   260,386
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,564,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,500
<INVENTORY>                                  2,171,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,581,626
<PP&E>                                     186,516,534
<DEPRECIATION>                              91,325,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             187,577,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,580,462
<BONDS>                                     18,084,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          137,500
<PREFERRED>                                    413,100
<COMMON>                                    35,562,858
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,025,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               187,577,074
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,423,778
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,174,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               477,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,771,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,438,763
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,332,651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.79
        

</TABLE>
LAB265_00002

LAB265_00003

LAB265_00004

LAB265_00005

LAB265_00006

LAB265_00007

LAB265_00008

LAB265_00009

LAB265_00010

LAB265_00011

LAB265_00012

LAB265_00013

LAB265_00014
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the North Carolina 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a planning 
meeting of the North Carolina Advisory Committee to the Commission will 
convene at 1:00 p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 5, 
1997, at Fayetteville State University, Chancellor's Boardroom, 1200 
Murchison Road, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301. The purpose of the 
meeting is to review the status of the Commission and its advisory 
committees; discuss plans for meeting with the Governor to follow up on 
church burning reports; discuss the draft of a report; and discuss 
civil rights progress/programs in North Carolina and the Nation.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Asa Spaulding, 
919-233-7613, or Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the Southern Regional 
Office, 404-730-2476 (TDD 404-730-2481). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, February 3, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-3140 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31864]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection 
Requests

    This notice lists information collection packages that will require 
submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in compliance 
with Pub. L. 104-13 effective October 1, 1995, The Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995.
    Work Incapacitation and Reintegration Study--0960-0543. The purpose 
of this study is to identify those incentives and interventions that 
are most successful in assisting persons who are disabled due to a back 
condition to return to work. The information collected will be used 
primarily to complete a cross-national analysis of this issue. Data 
will also be gathered on subjects of particular importance in the U.S. 
The findings will provide policy-makers with information that will be 
highly useful in establishing disability policy. The respondents are 
persons entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance, Supplemental 
Security Income or State Temporary Disability Insurance benefits due to 
a back condition.
    Number of Respondents: 800.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 1 hour.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 800 hours.
    Written comments and recommendations regarding the information 
collection(s) should be sent within 60 days from the date of this 
publication, directly to the SSA Reports Clearance Officer at the 
following address: Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: 
Nicholas E. Tagliareni, 6401 Security Blvd., 1-A-21 Operations Bldg., 
Baltimore, MD 21235.
    In addition to your comments on the accuracy of the agency's burden 
estimate, we are soliciting comments on the need for the information; 
its practical utility; ways to enhance its quality, utility and 
clarity; and on ways to minimize burden on respondents, including the 
use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    To receive a copy of any of the forms or clearance packages, call 
the SSA Reports Clearance Officer on (410) 965-4125 or write to him at 
the address listed above.

    Dated: December 1, 1997.
Nicholas E. Tagliareni,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-31864 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31894]



[[Page 64268]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 97-ANE-03; Amendment 39-10138; AD 97-19-18]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Inc. TSCP700-4B and -5 
Auxiliary Power Units

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive 
(AD) 97-19-18 applicable to AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly AiResearch and 
Garrett) TSCP700-4B and -5 Series Auxiliary Power Units (APUs) that was 
published in the Federal Register on September 22, 1997 (62 FR 49427). 
The Amendment number and AD number in the compliance section was 
inadvertently omitted. This document adds the Amendment number and AD 
number to the compliance section. In all other respects, the original 
document remains the same.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Baitoo, Aerospace Engineer, Los 
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; telephone 
(562) 627-5245; fax (562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final rule airworthiness directive 
applicable to AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly AiResearch and Garrett) 
TSCP700-4B and -5 Series Auxiliary Power Units (APUs), was published in 
the Federal Register on September 22, 1997 (62 FR 49427). The following 
correction is needed:


Sec. 39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 49428, in the third column, in the Compliance Section, in 
the first line, ``Amendment 39-XXXX'' is corrected to read ``Amendment 
39-10138''.
    On page 49428, in the third column, in the Compliance Section, in 
the third and fourth line, ``97-XX-XX AlliedSignal Inc.: Amendment 39-
XXXX'' is corrected to read ``97-19-18 AlliedSignal Inc.: Amendment 39-
10138.''

    Issued in Burlington, MA, on November 28, 1997.
Jay J. Pardee,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-31894 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   May  6,      2009 | By:    | /s/      Charles N.      Eldred                             |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |   | Charles      N. Eldred                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                                               |   | Executive      Vice President and                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                                               |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                               |   | PNM      Resources, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                |

----
#### Mabel J. BLAIR, A. Fred Blair, Howard Blair, J. B. Dryden, Ruth D. Hale, Dorris D. Miller and Louise D. Duke, Appellants, v. Theodore V. RAMSEY, Appellee.

No. 70-750.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 12, 1971.

Harlan Tuck, of Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, Orlando, for appellants.

Russell Troutman, of Law Offices of Russell Troutman, Winter Park, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, in a suit to set aside a deed and for other equitable relief. The trial court had two basic factual issues to resolve. One was whether or not the grantor of certain real estate in Orange County, Florida, had capacity to execute a deed on IS March 1966, and the other is whether or not that deed was the product of fraud or undue influence. From our review of the record we conclude that there was competent substantial evidence in the record to support the implied finding of the trial judge that no fraud or undue influence was practiced and that the grantor was competent. We have also reviewed each of the other points presented by the appellants and conclude that they do not demonstrate reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, Fla.App. 1970, 239 So. 2d 506 and In re Starr’s Estate, 1935, 125 Fla. 536, 170 So. 620.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED and MAGER, JJ„ concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RAUL VILLAVICENCIO-BURRUEL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50559

D.C. No. 3:08-cr-02509-IEG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2011** 

Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Raul Villavicencio-Burruel appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed on

remand following an appeal from his jury-trial conviction for attempted entry after

deportation and making a false claim to citizenship, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326

and 18 U.S.C. § 911, respectively. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

FILED

OCT 04 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50559

and we affirm.

Villavicencio-Burruel argues that the district court erred in applying the 16-

level crime of violence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). That

issue is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Villavicencio-Burruel, 608

F.3d 556 (9th Cir. 2010), as he acknowledges.

He raises two additional contentions of procedural error. First, he argues

that the district court failed to consider the unwarranted sentence disparity created

by the split between this court and the Fifth Circuit on application of the crime of

violence enhancement to convictions under California Penal Code § 422. The

record belies this contention and makes clear that the district court was fully

apprised of the inter-circuit split.

Next, he contends that the district court failed to address his arguments

regarding his rehabilitation since the time of his initial sentencing. The record

reflects that the court entertained his arguments, and its statements at sentencing

were sufficient to permit meaningful appellate review of its below-Guidelines

sentence, the substantive reasonableness of which sentence is not challenged. See

United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93, 995 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). 

AFFIRMED.
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41205 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CUAHTEMOC LABASTIDA-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-96-CR-37-1

- - - - - - - - - - November 12, 1997 Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: 1 Cuahtemoc Labastida-Salazar appeals from his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin. He argues that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3147 and by increasing his offense level by two pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). Because the releasing judge did not comply with 18 U.S.C. § 3142(h)(2)(A), the sentencing court erred by enhancing Labastida-Salazar’s sentence pursuant to § 3147. See United States v. Onick , 889 F.2d 1425, 1433-35 & n.7 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, the thirty-month sentence imposed pursuant to§ 3147 is VACATED. The remainder of the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64817-64818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-78-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1997, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC

[[Page 64818]]

Gas Tariff, the following tariff sheets, to become effective January 1, 
1998:

Second Revised Volume No. 1-A

Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 20
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 22
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 23
Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 24
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 26
Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 27
First Revised Sheet Nos. 33 through 35

Third Revised Volume No. 2

Forty-second Revised Sheet No. 1-D.2
Thirty-fifth Revised Sheet No. 1-D.3

    El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to 
adjust its rates for inflation, to revise the Risk Sharing Amounts, and 
to revise the Reservation Add-On, all as permitted by Sections 25.1 and 
25.2 of the Volume No. 1-A Tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32141 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2147 

To prohibit States and local educational agencies that ban books from receiving funds under the Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants 

program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To prohibit States and local educational agencies that ban 

books from receiving funds under the Student Support 

and Academic Enrichment Grants program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guarding Readers 

5 Independence and Choice Act’’, or the ‘‘GRINCH Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOSS OF ELIGIBILITY FOR BANNING BOOKS. 

7 Subpart 1 of part A of title IV of the Elementary 

8 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7111 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2147 IH

1 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following 

2 new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 4113. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro5 vision of this subpart, except as provided in subsection (b), 

6 a State or local educational agency that has in place any 

7 law or policy that prohibits the availability of books or 

8 other written materials to students, teachers, or schools 

9 within such State or local educational agency based on a 

10 determination that such books or materials contain offen11 sive or outdated language or images shall not be eligible 

12 to receive funds under this subpart. 

13 ‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec14 tion shall be construed to prohibit a State or local edu15 cational agency from prohibiting the availability of books 

16 or other written materials that contain obscene or porno17 graphic text or images or content that is harmful to mi18 nors.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

I, Thomas N. Chewning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Natural Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 5(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 4, 2005
 
 
     /s/ Thomas N. Chewning