73210 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

described in the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). 

Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action also does not have 

Federalism implications because it does 

not have substantial direct effects on the 

states, on the relationship between the 

national government and the states, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999). This action merely 

disapproves a state rule, and does not 

alter the relationship or the distribution 

of power and responsibilities 

established in the CAA. 

Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This rule is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), nor will it impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

This rule also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because it disapproves 

a state rule. 

Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

Because it is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866 or a ‘‘significant energy 

action,’’ this action is also not subject to 

Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001). 

National Technology Transfer 

Advancement Act 

In reviewing state submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. In this context, in the absence 

of a prior existing requirement for the 

state to use voluntary consensus 

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 

to disapprove a state submission for 

failure to use VCS. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA, when it reviews a state 

submission, to use VCS in place of a 

state submission that otherwise satisfies 

the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. 

Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions 

to Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 

(Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes Federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

Federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

EPA lacks the discretionary authority 

to address environmental justice in this 

action. In reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve or disapprove 

state choices, based on the criteria of the 

CAA. Accordingly, this action merely 

disapproves certain state requirements 

for inclusion into the SIP under section 

110 and subchapter I, part D of the CAA 

and will not in-and-of itself create any 

new requirements. Accordingly, it does 

not provide EPA with the discretionary 

authority to address, as appropriate, 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects, using practicable 

and legally permissible methods, under 

Executive Order 12898. 

Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by February 9, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: November 25, 2014. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.777 is amended by 

adding paragraph (ss), to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.777 Control strategy: photochemical 

oxidents (hydrocarbons). 

* * * * * 

(ss) Disapproval. EPA is disapproving 

Indiana’s December 5, 2012, ozone 

redesignation request for Lake and 

Porter Counties for the 2008 ozone 

standard. EPA is also disapproving 

Indiana’s motor vehicle emission 

budgets and ozone maintenance plan 

submitted with the redesignation 

request. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28799 Filed 12–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0601; FRL–9918–88] 

Alpha-cypermethrin; Pesticide 

Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a 

tolerance for residues of alphacypermethrin in or on food 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 73211 

commodities/feed commodities in food/ 

feed handling establishments. BASF on 

behalf of Whitmire Micro-Gen Research 

Laboratories requested this tolerance 

under the Federal Food, Drug, and 

Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

December 10, 2014. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before February 9, 2015, and must 

be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0601, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2014–0601 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before February 9, 2015. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2014–0601, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Summary of Petitioned-For 

Tolerance 

In the Federal Register of September 

5, 2014 (79 FR 53009) (FRL–9914–98), 

EPA issued a document pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 

346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a 

pesticide petition (PP 3F8189) by BASF 

on behalf of Whitmire Micro-Gen 

Research Laboratories, 3568 Tree Court 

Industrial Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63122– 

6682. The petition requested that 40 

CFR part 180 be amended by 

establishing tolerances for residues of 

the insecticide alpha-cypermethrin, in 

or on food/feed handling establishments 

at 0.05 parts per million (ppm). That 

document referenced a summary of the 

petition prepared by BASF on behalf of 

Whitmire Micro-Gen Research 

Laboratories, the registrant, which is 

available in the docket, http://

www.regulations.gov. Comments were 

received on the notice of filing. EPA’s 

response to these comments is 

discussed in Unit IV.C. 

EPA has corrected the proposed 

commodity definition to read food 

commodities/feed commodities (other 

than those covered by a higher tolerance 

as a result of use on growing crops) in 

food/feed handling establishments. 

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and 

Determination of Safety 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue, including 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and in 

residential settings, but does not include 

occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue. . . .’’ 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in 

FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has 

reviewed the available scientific data 

and other relevant information in 

support of this action. EPA has 

sufficient data to assess the hazards of 

and to make a determination on 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
73212 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

aggregate exposure for alphacypermethrin including exposure 

resulting from the tolerances established 

by this action. EPA’s assessment of 

exposures and risks associated with 

alpha-cypermethrin follows. 

Alpha-cypermethrin is an enriched 

isomer of the pyrethroid insecticide 

cypermethrin. In addition, zetacypermethrin is also an enriched isomer 

of cypermethrin. The toxicology 

database for the cypermethrins includes 

studies with cypermethrin and both of 

its enriched isomers, and is considered 

complete for the purpose of risk 

assessment. When considering alphacypermethrin the EPA also considers 

potential exposures from the other 

registered cypermethrins (i.e., 

cypermethrin and zeta-cypermethrin), 

since the 3 active ingredients are 

essentially the same active from the 

mammalian toxicity perspective. The 

recommended tolerance of 0.05 ppm 

associated with the food handling 

establishment use of alphacypermethrin is at the same level as the 

one currently established for zetacypermethrin. Based on the available 

alpha-cypermethrin residue data 

submitted for the food handling 

establishment use, this use will not 

result in alpha-cypermethrin residues 

higher than 0.05 ppm and is the same 

as the existing tolerance of 0.05 ppm 

established to support the food handling 

establishment uses for zetacypermethrin. The existing dietary and 

aggregate risk assessments already 

account for the impact of the existing 

zeta-cypermethrin food handling 

establishment use (i.e. 100% crop 

treated for all commodities without an 

existing tolerance). Therefore, the 

addition of the food handling 

establishment use for alphacypermethrin will have no impact on 

the dietary risk estimates, as they are 

already covered in the existing dietary 

and aggregate risk assessments. 

In the Federal Register of February 1, 

2013 (78 FR 7266) (FRL–9376–1), the 

EPA published a final rule to establish 

tolerances for residues of the insecticide 

alpha-cypermethrin in or on alfalfa, hay 

at 15 ppm; citrus, dried pulp at 1.8 ppm; 

citrus fruit, Group 10 at 0.35 ppm; 

citrus, oil at 4.0 ppm; corn, grain; 

cottonseed; cucurbit vegetables, Group 

9; dried shelled pea and bean, except 

soybean, subgroup 6C; edible podded 

legume vegetable, subgroup 6A; fruiting 

vegetables, Group 8; head and stem 

Brassica, subgroup 5A at 2.0 ppm; leafy 

vegetable, except Brassica, Group 4 at 10 

ppm; pop-corn; rice, grain at 1.5 ppm; 

root and tuber vegetables, Group 1 at 0.1 

ppm; sorghum, grain at 0.5 ppm; 

soybeans; succulent shelled pea and 

bean, subgroup 6B; sugar beet, roots at 

0.05 ppm; sugar beet, tops; sweet corn; 

tree nuts, Group 14; and wheat, grain at 

0.2 ppm. Since the publication of the 

February 1, 2013 final rule, the toxicity 

profile of alpha-cypermethrin has not 

changed and since the food handling 

establishment use for alphacypermethrin will have no impact on 

the dietary or aggregate risk estimates, 

the risk assessments that supported the 

establishment of those alphacypermethrin tolerances published in 

the February 1, 2013 Federal Register 

remain valid. Therefore, EPA is relying 

on those risk assessments in order to 

support the new food handling 

tolerance for alpha-cypermethrin. 

For a detailed discussion of the 

aggregate risk assessments and 

determination of safety for the food 

handling tolerance, please refer to the 

February 1, 2013 Federal Register 

document and its supporting 

documents, available at http://

www.regulations.gov in Docket ID 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0234. EPA 

relies upon those supporting risk 

assessments and the findings made in 

the Federal Register document in 

support of this final rule. 

Based on the risk assessments and 

information described above, EPA 

concludes that there is a reasonable 

certainty that no harm will result to the 

general population, or to infants and 

children from aggregate exposure to 

alpha-cypermethrin residues. Further 

information can also be found in the 

document, ‘‘Alpha-Cypermethrin— 

Human Health Risk Assessment for Two 

New Proposed Products for Use in 

Commercial/Residential Settings’’ in 

docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014– 

0601. 

IV. Other Considerations 

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

Adequate tolerance-enforcement 

methods are available in Pesticide 

Analytical Manual (PAM) Volume II for 

determining residues of cypermethrin, 

zeta-cypermethrin and alphacypermethrin in plant (Method I) and 

livestock (Method II) commodities. Both 

methods are gas chromatographic 

methods with electron-capture detection 

(GC/ECD), and have undergone 

successful Agency petition method 

validations (PMVs). Method I has a limit 

of detection (LOD) of 0.01 ppm, and 

Method II has LODs of 0.005 ppm in 

milk, and 0.01 ppm in livestock tissues. 

These methods are not stereospecific; 

thus no distinction is made between 

residues of cypermethrin (all eight 

stereoisomers), zeta-cypermethrin 

(enriched in four isomers) and alphacypermethrin (two isomers). 

The method may be requested from: 

Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, 

Environmental Science Center, 701 

Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350; 

telephone number: (410) 305–2905; 

email address: residuemethods@

epa.gov. 

B. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

The Codex Alimentarius is a joint 

United Nations Food and Agriculture 

Organization/World Health 

Organization food standards program, 

and it is recognized as an international 

food safety standards-setting 

organization in trade agreements to 

which the United States is a party. EPA 

may establish a tolerance that is 

different from a Codex MRL; however, 

FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that 

EPA explain the reasons for departing 

from the Codex level. 

There is no Codex MRL for residues 

of alpha-cypermethrin in or on food 

commodities/feed commodities (other 

than those covered by a higher tolerance 

as a results of use on growing crops) in 

food/feed handling establishments. 

C. Response to Comments 

The EPA received 4 comments in 

response to this Notice of Filing. Two 

commenters were opposed to increasing 

the amount of pesticides being used and 

did not approve of the proposal. The 

Agency understands the commenter’s 

concerns and recognizes that some 

individuals believe that certain 

pesticide chemicals should not be 

permitted in our food. However, the 

existing legal framework provided by 

section 408 of the FFDCA states that 

tolerances may be set when EPA 

determines that aggregate exposure to 

that pesticide is safe, i.e., that there is 

a reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue. When 

making this determination, EPA 

considers the toxicity, including any 

potential carcinogenicity, of the 

pesticide and all anticipated dietary 

exposures and all other exposures for 

which there is reliable information. EPA 

also gives special consideration to the 

potential susceptibility and exposures of 

infants and children to the pesticide 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 73213 

chemical residue when making this 

determination. For alpha-cypermethrin, 

the Agency has considered all the 

available data, including all available 

data concerning the potential for 

carcinogenicity and concluded after 

conducting a risk assessment, that there 

is a reasonable certainty that no harm 

will result from aggregate human 

exposure to alpha-cypermethrin. 

Two additional commenters raised 

concerns regarding exposure to bees. 

However, the proposed use is for 

pesticide applications to be made 

indoors to food/feed handling 

establishments and therefore, there 

should be no exposure to bees from the 

proposed application. 

V. Conclusion 

Therefore, the tolerance is established 

for residues of alpha-cypermethrin, in or 

on food commodities/feed commodities 

(other than those covered by a higher 

tolerance as a results of use on growing 

crops) in food/feed handling 

establishments at 0.05 ppm. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This final rule establishes tolerances 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this final rule 

has been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this final rule is 

not subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This final rule does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This final rule directly regulates 

growers, food processors, food handlers, 

and food retailers, not States or tribes, 

nor does this action alter the 

relationships or distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

Congress in the preemption provisions 

of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, 

the Agency has determined that this 

action will not have a substantial direct 

effect on States or tribal governments, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined 

that Executive Order 13132, entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999) and Executive Order 13175, 

entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply 

to this final rule. In addition, this final 

rule does not impose any enforceable 

duty or contain any unfunded mandate 

as described under Title II of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: November 26, 2014. 

Susan Lewis, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.418, revise the section 

heading and add alphabetically the 

following commodity to the table in 

paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: 

§ 180.418 Cypermethrin and isomers 

alpha-cypermethrin and zeta-cypermethrin; 

tolerances for residues. 

(a) * * * 

(3) * * * 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

*******

Food commodities/feed commodities (other than those covered by a higher tolerance as a results of use on growing crops) in 

food/feed handling establishments .................................................................................................................................................. 0.05 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–28934 Filed 12–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES