alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned is the CEO and President of Earn-A-Car, Inc. This Certification
is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Earn-ACar, Inc. for
the year ended February 28, 2013.

The undersigned certifies that such report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Earn-A-Car, Inc. as of
February 28, 2013.

This Certification is executed as of June 13, 2013.


                                           /s/ John Storey
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           John Storey
                                           CEO and President
Exhibit 31.1

I, Thos. E. Capps, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Natural Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
       Date: August 3, 2005
 
 
        /s/ Thos. E. Capps
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2142 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2142

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 170 Manhattan Avenue in Buffalo, New York, as the ``Indiana Hunt-
                     Martin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDIANA HUNT-MARTIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 170 Manhattan Avenue in Buffalo, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Indiana Hunt-Martin Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Indiana 
Hunt-Martin Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Countrywide Financial Corporation (the “Company”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric P. Sieracki, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Eric P. Sieracki    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Eric P. Sieracki        |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 9, 2007          |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to Countrywide FinancialCorporation and will be retained by Countrywide Financial Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-30882]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1088; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-15-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dowty Propellers Propellers

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2013-30882, appearing on pages 78290-
78292, in the issue of Thursday, December 26, 2013, make the following 
correction:
    On page 78290, in the first column, the subject heading is 
corrected to read as set forth above.

[FR Doc. C1-2013-30882 Filed 1-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Quarterly Report to Congress on International Monetary Fund Lending 

October 1 – December 31, 2018 

Board 

Approval 

Date 

Country Amount Type U.S. Position Background 

11/30 Sierra Leone US$21.5 million Request for an Arrangement 

Under the Extended Credit 

Facility 

Support http://www.imf.org/en/N 

ews/Articles/2018/11/30 

/pr18446-imf-executiveboard-approvesarrangement-under-theextended-credit-facilityfor-sierra-leone 

12/7 Angola US$3.7 billion Request for an Extended 

Arrangement Under the 

Extended Fund Facility 

Support http://www.imf.org/en/N 

ews/Articles/2018/12/07 

/pr18463imf-executiveboard-approvesextended-arrangementunder-the-extendedfund-facility-for-angola 

12/17 Morocco US$2.97 billion Request for an Arrangement 

Under the Precautionary and 

Liquidity Line 

Support http://www.imf.org/en/N 

ews/Articles/2018/12/17 

/pr18477-imf-executiveboard-approvesmorocco-precautionaryliquidity-line 

12/18 Ukraine US$3.9 billion Request for a Stand-By 

Arrangement and Cancellation 

of Arrangement Under the 

Extended Fund Facility 

Support http://www.imf.org/en/N 

ews/Articles/2018/12/18 

/pr18483-ukraine-imfexecutive-boardapproves-14-monthstand-by-arrangement
**Exhibit 32.2.2**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

 

I, Robert Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2008, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: November 7, 2008
**EXHIBIT 10.139**

**FIFTHAMENDMENTTOCOUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONDEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN*Originally Effective August 1, 1993Amended and Restated Effective March , 2000***

CountrywideFinancial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) hereby amends theCountrywide Financial Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), byaction of its Administrative Committee, to establish effective dates forelections to defer compensation under the Plan.

1.               Section 3.3(b) isdeleted in its entirety and new Section 3.3(b) is hereby inserted in its placeas follows:

“**Subsequent Plan Years**.  For each succeeding Plan Year, an irrevocableelection for that Plan year, and such other elections as the Committee deemsnecessary or desirable under the Plan, shall be made by timely delivering tothe Committee, in accordance with its rules and procedures, before the end ofthe Plan Year preceding the Plan Year for which the election is made (i) fordeferral of Base Annual Salary and (ii) effective December 31, 2004, in thePlan Year preceding the Plan Year for which an Annual Bonus is payable, a newElection Form.  If no such Election Formis timely delivered for a Plan Year, the Annual Deferral Amount shall be zerofor that Plan Year.”

The Company hascaused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer as of this23rd of September 2005.
|        | Countrywide Financial Corporation |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |                              |
|   |                              |
|   | By:                               | /s/ Marshall M. Gates |
|   |                              | Marshall Gates |
|   |                              | Managing Director, |
|   |                              | Chief Administrative Officer |

 

----
256 La. 773

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Juanita ALLUMS.

No. 50760.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 30, 1970.

In re: Juanita Allums applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted. See State v. Wells, 253 La. 925, 221 So.2d 50 also dissent in State v. Lampkin, 253 La. 337, 218 So.2d 289, also Augilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723, also Art. 1 Sec. 7 La. Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000880416
<NAME>NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  538,422
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 52,544
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      74,592
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    71,135
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             736,693
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  160,999
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,840
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             162,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        65,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              270,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             238,853
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              736,693
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  199,303
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                        10,009
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 139,092
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 165,991
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     33,312
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          (3,016)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              47,186
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    23,098
<NET-INCOME>                                24,088
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               24,088
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    35,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                     109,094
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

July Term 2014

RENEE HILL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of

SHARON BRONOWICZ, Deceased,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC.,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 4D12-4309

[November 5, 2014]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Dwight L. Geiger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562010CA03775.

Guy Bennett Rubin and Gladys C. Laforge of Rubin & Rubin, Stuart,

and Michael J. Korn of Korn & Zehmer, P.A., Jacksonville, for 

appellant/cross appellee.

Addison J. Meyers of Mintzer, Sarowitz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, Miami,

and Kimberly L. Boldt of Boldt Law Firm, Boca Raton, for appellee/cross 

appellant.

PER CURIAM.

On the plaintiff’s appeal, we affirm the trial court’s order granting the 

defendant’s motion for new trial. See, e.g., Intramed, Inc. v. Guider, 93 So. 

3d 503, 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“The closing argument shifted the focus 

of the case from compensating the plaintiff to punishing the defendant. 

. . . The purpose of damages here was to compensate, not to make the 

defendant care, ‘take responsibility,’ or say it was sorry. Counsel’s 

arguments improperly suggested that the defendant should be punished 

for contesting damages at trial and that its defense of the claim in court 

was improper. The closing argument was designed to inflame the emotions 

of the jury rather than prompt a logical analysis of the evidence in light of 

the applicable law.”) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).

On the defendant’s cross-appeal, we affirm without discussion the trial 

court’s order denying the defendant’s motion for directed verdict. We also 
2

affirm without discussion the trial court’s orders admitting the evidence 

which became the subject of the defendant’s motion for directed verdict.

Because we affirm the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s 

motion for new trial, we do not review in this appeal the trial court’s orders 

granting the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, denying 

the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, and granting the 

defendant’s motion for remittitur. All of those orders reflect the trial 

court’s determination that the non-economic damages cap contained in 

section 394.9085(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), applied to all three counts 

which the plaintiff pled in this case. As the parties properly conceded at 

oral argument, our review of that determination will not become ripe 

unless the plaintiff, at the new trial, obtains a jury verdict which exceeds

the non-economic damages cap contained in section 394.9085(1)(b).

Affirmed in part and remanded for new trial.

GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Utilities (the
registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Michael G. Morris,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and John H.
Forsgren, Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

/s/ Michael G. Morris
    (Signature)
    Michael G. Morris
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ John H. Forsgren
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  692,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    534,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,507,100
<PP&E>                                       1,638,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 929,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,856,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,046,100
<BONDS>                                        713,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       615,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,037,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,856,500
<SALES>                                      1,882,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,882,200
<CGS>                                        1,261,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,261,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                255,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    92,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            163,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72


</TABLE>
#### Clarence DEMPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-345.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 3, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1971.

Ernest D. Jackson, Sr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*448PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs have been carefully considered. The Appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed from is

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., RAWLS, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.
#### STUART v. CORAL GABLES FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS’N.

No. 38408.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 10,1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 218 So.2d 544.
#### Charlie BRAZELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-442.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 28, 1972.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and John Wayne Hogan, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Brown v. State, 245 So.2d 68 (Fla.1971).

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

April 9, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with VNG Co.

FROM: Steven Silverman

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

On April 6, 2012 various EPA officials met with representatives of VNG Co. VNG produces 

infrastructure -- chiefly refueling apparatus, for compressed natural gas vehicles. They view 

CNG refueling infrastructure as a bridge to fuel cell electric vehicles, since the same 

infrastructure used for CNG refueling is compatible with fuel cells (a steam reformer would need 

to be added). The company's representatives echoed their public comments that some type of 

incentive like a multiplier would be appropriate for CNG vehicles, at least in the program's initial 

years. A version of the company's presentation is attached.

Attachment