alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63724-63725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Agency Information Collection Activities: Approved Collections

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approval of information collections (1010-0006 and 
1010-0050).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and 
respondent burden, this notice informs the public and other Federal 
agencies of the approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
of two collections of information. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA) provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person 
is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it 
displays a currently valid OMB control number.

ADDRESSES: Direct all correspondence to the Rules Processing Team, 
Minerals Management Service, Mail Stop 4020, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, 
VA 20170-4817.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexis London, Rules Processing Team, telephone (703) 787-1600. You may 
also contact Alexis London to obtain a copy of these collections of 
information.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Titles: 30 CFR 250, Subpart J, Pipelines and 
Pipeline Rights-of-Way; and 30 CFR Part 256, Leasing of Sulphur or Oil 
and Gas in the Outer Continental Shelf. OMB Control Numbers: 1010-0050 
and 1010-0006.
    Abstract: On July 24, 1997 MMS published a final rule on Pipeline 
Right-

[[Page 63725]]

of-Way Applications and Assignment Fees; Requirements for Filing of 
Lease Transfers (RIN 1010-AC04, 62 FR 39773). The final rule became 
effective on September 22, 1997. In the preamble to the final rule, MMS 
stated that the information collection aspects of the rule had been 
submitted to OMB for approval and would not take effect until OMB 
approved the collections. On August 25, 1997, OMB approved both of the 
related collections of information with expiration dates of August 31, 
2000. The information collection aspects of the final rule are 
effective with the final rule.

Bureau Clearance Officer: Jo Ann Lauterbach (202) 208-7744.

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief, Engineering and Operations Division.
[FR Doc. 97-31475 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2017

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/29 1/3 1/5 35.00 28.00 22.00 20.00 132.00 -27.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 1/5 1/9 1/12 40.00 30.00 24.00 114.00 -20.00

1/12 1/17 1/19 45.00 32.00 26.00 114.00 -11.00

1/19 1/23 1/26 50.00 34.00 28.00 109.00 3.00

1/26 1/30 2/2 55.00 35.00 30.00 20.00 127.00 13.00

2/2 2/6 2/9 55.00 35.00 30.00 114.00 6.00

2/9 2/13 2/16 55.00 35.00 30.00 119.00 1.00

2/16 2/21 2/23 55.00 35.00 30.00 122.00 -2.00

2/23 2/27 3/2 55.00 36.00 30.00 20.00 145.00 -4.00

3/2 3/6 3/9 55.00 36.00 30.00 125.00 -4.00

3/9 3/13 3/16 55.00 36.00 30.00 123.00 -2.00

3/16 3/20 3/23 55.00 36.00 30.00 121.00 0.00

3/23 3/27 3/30 55.00 36.00 30.00 20.00 139.00 2.00

1559.00 1604.00 -45.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

2-year note 12/22 12/27 1/3 26.00 0.00

5-year note 12/22 12/28 1/3 34.00 0.00

7-year note 12/22 12/29 1/3 28.00 0.00 84.38 3.62

3-year Note 1/5 1/10 1/17 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 1/5 1/11 1/17 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 1/5 1/12 1/17 12.00 0.00 47.51 8.49

10-year TIPS 1/12 1/19 1/31 13.00 0.00

2-year note 1/19 1/24 1/31 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 1/19 1/25 1/31 15.00 0.00

5-year note 1/19 1/25 1/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 1/19 1/26 1/31 28.00 0.00 127.82 -11.82

3-year Note 2/1 2/7 2/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note 2/1 2/8 2/15 23.00 0.00

30-year Bond 2/1 2/9 2/15 15.00 0.00 45.03 16.97

2-year FRN (r) 2/16 2/22 2/24 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

30-year TIPS 2/9 2/16 2/28 7.00 0.00

2-year note 2/16 2/21 2/28 26.00 0.00

5-year note 2/16 2/22 2/28 34.00 0.00

7-year note 2/16 2/23 2/28 28.00 0.00 81.11 13.89

3-year Note 3/2 3/7 3/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 3/2 3/8 3/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 3/2 3/9 3/15 12.00 0.00 30.00 26.00

10-year TIPS (r) 3/16 3/23 3/31 11.00 0.00

2-year note 3/23 3/27 3/31 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 3/23 3/28 3/31 13.00 0.00

5-year note 3/23 3/29 3/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 3/23 3/29 3/31 28.00 0.00 81.35 30.65

510.00 497.21 100.79

Estimates are italicized. r = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 56
#### Frank T. SALTER, Jr., et al. v. B. W. S. CORPORATION, INC.

No. 53629.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1973.

In re: B. W. S. Corporation, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 281 So.2d 764.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

November 12,
2004

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comcast Holdings Corporation (the "Report") for the purpose of complying
with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code.

Brian
L. Roberts, the Chief Executive Officer, Lawrence S. Smith, the Co-Chief Financial Officer and John R. Alchin, the Co-Chief Financial Officer of Comcast Holdings
Corporation, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| |  | /s/BRIAN L. ROBERTSName: Brian L. Roberts
Chief Executive Officer     
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/LAWRENCE S. SMITHName: Lawrence S. Smith
Co-Chief Financial Officer
| |  | /s/JOHN R. ALCHINName: John R. Alchin
Co-Chief Financial Officer      

---



QuickLinks
| 1. | Party      A provides [_____] and      delivers the same to the production factory of Party  B. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Party      B completes the stabilization processing within [___] days      after receiving the raw materials provided by Party  A. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Party      B is responsible for the quality of the products in the coating processing      and shall provide Party A with conveniences at delivery of Party      A. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | Party      A takes delivery at the factory of Party B by  itself. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | Party      B issues the value-added tax invoice for Party A at the time of taking      delivery. The processing fee is [___], which      shall be settled in the next month. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6. | For      the purpose of maintaining the interests of Party A and Party B, the      parties hereby reach the confidentiality agreement as    below: |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 7. | The      agreement is made in two counterparts. Each party holds one counterpart.      Matters not mentioned herein must be settled by the parties through      negotiations. The fax copy of the agreement is  valid. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### Hampesle Lee JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-317.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 22, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Steven GRABOW and Bernard Grabow, Appellants, v. Arnold LEHRER, as guardian ad litem for the appellee Richard Lehrer, a minor, Appellees.

No. 69-2.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 1, 1969.

*768■Nichols & Nichols, Miami, for appellants.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Da-vant, Miami, for appellees.

.Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs below from a final judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Dade County in favor of the defendants following a jury verdict of not guilty in an action for personal injuries.

Plaintiffs seek reversal of the judgment and a new trial on the ground that the trial court erred to the prejudice of the plaintiffs in denying the request of the plaintiffs to exercise their remaining peremptory challenge prior to the time the jury was sworn.

The controlling facts upon which we must base our decision are contained in the following stipulation:

> “COME NOW the plaintiffs and the defendant, by and through their undersigned attorneys, in accordance with Rule 3.6(h) and stipulate and agree that for all Appellate purposes and any other purposes that the record of the proceedings in the trial court for the trial of the above-styled cause shows the following:

> “1. That this case was tried before a jury in the Circuit Court in Dade County, Florida.

> “2. That the plaintiffs were allowed three peremptory challenges in their voir dire selection.

> “3. That the plaintiffs exercised two peremptory challenges during their voir dire selection.

> “4. That after the plaintiffs’ attorneys tendered the jury panel for questioning to the defendant’s attorney and after the defendant’s attorney accepted the jury but before the jury was sworn, the plaintiffs’ attorney attempted to exercise his one remaining unused peremptory challenge by requesting the Court that he be allowed to do so; however, the Court denied such request, holding that the jury had been tendered by the plaintiffs.

> “5. That no reason was given by plaintiffs’ attorney as to why he desired to use his last peremptory challenge other than stating he desired to use such challenge before the jury was sworn.

> “6. That the plaintiffs’ attorney was not allowed by the Court and was therefore unable to use his last remaining peremptory challenge before the jury was sworn.

> *“7.*That the jury was sworn, the case tried and a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant.

> “8. That the plaintiffs desire to appeal from the final judgment for the defendant, and to claim as reversible error the failure and refusal of the trial court to permit the plaintiffs to exercise their remaining peremptory challenge as set forth herein.”

We have considered appellants’ contention in the light of the stipulation which shows a *tender of the jury to the defendants for questioning*and have concluded that it was reversible error for the trial court to deny plaintiffs the right to exercise their third peremptory challenge. [Emphasis supplied.]

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Availability of a Plan of Operations and Environmental Assessment 
for a Plan of Operations; Williams Field Services Company, North Padre 
Island Lateral Natural Gas Pipeline, Padre Island National Seashore, 
Kenedy County, Texas

    The National Park Service has received from Williams Field Services 
Company, a Plan of Operations for the existing North Padre Island 
Lateral Natural Gas Pipeline at Padre Island National Seashore, Kenedy 
County, Texas.
    Pursuant to Sec. 9.52(b) of Title 36 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations, Part 9, Subpart B (36 CFR 9B); the Plan of Operations and 
Environmental Assessment are available for public review and comment 
for a period of 30 days from the publication date of this notice in the 
Office of the Superintendent, Padre Island National Seashore, 9405 
South Padre Island Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas. Copies of the 
documents are available from the Superintendent, Padre Island National 
Seashore, 9405 South Padre Island Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas 78418, 
and will be sent upon request.

    Dated: February 3, 1997.
Patrick C. McCrary,
Superintendent, Padre Island National Seashore.
[FR Doc. 97-3245 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### Cleveland BRYANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1167.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Steven Rappaport, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant was informed against and pled guilty to (1) grand larceny and (2) cárrying a concealed firearm. He was sentenced to 88 days in the Dade County Jail plus five years probation thereafter on the first count, and 23 days in the county jail and five years probation thereafter on the second charge. Subsequently, an affidavit of probation violation was filed and a hearing held thereon. The court revoked appellant’s probation and sentenced him to serve 18 months in the state penitentiary.

■ Defendant-appellant raises two points on appeal neither of which necessitates the court’s consideration as the original sentences imposed in the case sub judice are *patently illegal.*

This court repeatedly has made it absolutely clear that a designated sentence to the county jail followed by a period of probation is not authorized by Fla.Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A. See Williams v. State, Fla.App.1973, 280 So.2d 518; Hutchins v. *123State, Fla.App. 1973, 286 So.2d 244; Cleveland v. State, Fla.App.1973, 287 So.2d 347; Kohn v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 289 So.2d 48.

Accordingly, the provisions in the original sentences for probation are stricken and hence the order revoking probation and sentence of 18 months in the state- penitentiary for violation thereof is hereby reversed.

Reversed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Lucas, Sr., Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 332]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered January 4, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth *305degree (three counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 5 to 10 years, 5 to 10 years and four years, concurrent with three terms of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The motion court properly concluded that the warrantless arrest of defendant in his apartment was valid and denied suppression of drugs in plain view and other alleged fruits of the police entry. In this long-term investigation, the police had the vicinity of defendant’s apartment under surveillance and were planning to arrest two of defendant’s accomplices on the day in question. Although there was ample probable cause for defendant’s arrest, the police had no intention of arresting him that day or of entering his apartment *(compare, People v Levan,*62 NY2d 139). Immediately after the two accomplices consummated a drug transaction with an undercover officer, the police attempted, as planned, to make a lawful warrantless arrest of them but they frustrated that plan by retreating into defendant’s apartment. This permitted the police to make a warrantless entry in pursuit *(United States v Santana,*427 US 38; *People v Glia,*226 AD2d 66, 72, *appeal dismissed*91 NY2d 846). Moreover, the officers had reason to believe, based on their familiarity with the sellers’ participation in prior drug sales, that a successful retreat into the apartment would have resulted in an attempt to remove or destroy evidence or perhaps to flee from another exit.

When the People requested closure of the courtroom during the undercover officer’s testimony, the court proposed, instead, a screening procedure for prospective visitors, and defendant took no exception. Accordingly, his present claim that there was an insufficient foundation for the screening procedure is unpreserved *(People v Rodriguez,*248 AD2d 181, *lv denied*91 NY2d 1012), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the prosecutor’s representations were sufficient to establish a compelling reason for partial closure *(People v Melendez,*269 AD2d 292, *lv denied*95 NY2d 868).

The People likewise made a sufficient showing to permit the undercover officer to testify anonymously *(see, People v Kearse,*215 AD2d 104, *lv denied*86 NY2d 797), and defendant has not established that this ruling caused him any prejudice.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling was a proper exercise of discretion.

The record does not establish that defendant’s sentence was based on any improper criteria and we perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97N-0323]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Notice of Participation'' has been 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of August 7, 1997 
(62 FR 42561), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 
section 3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507). An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 
OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB 
control number 0910-0191. The approval expires on September 30, 2000.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-32080 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2433 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take actions necessary to 

ensure that certain individuals may update the burn pit registry with 

a registered individual’s cause of death, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself and Mr. WENSTRUP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take actions 

necessary to ensure that certain individuals may update 

the burn pit registry with a registered individual’s cause 

of death, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burn Pit Registry En5 hancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BURN PIT REGISTRY UPDATES. 

7 (a) INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO UPDATE.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2433 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec3 retary of Veterans Affairs shall take actions nec4 essary to ensure that the burn pit registry may be 

5 updated with the cause of death of a deceased reg6 istered individual by— 

7 (A) an individual designated by such de8 ceased registered individual; or 

9 (B) if no such individual is designated, an 

10 immediate family member of such deceased reg11 istered individual. 

12 (2) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall pro13 vide, with respect to the burn pit registry, a process 

14 by which a registered individual may make a des15 ignation for purposes of paragraph (1)(A). 

16 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

17 (1) The term ‘‘burn pit registry’’ means the 

18 registry established under section 201 of the Dig19 nified Burial and Other Veterans’ Benefits Improve20 ment Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 

21 527 note). 

22 (2) The term ‘‘immediate family member’’, with 

23 respect to a deceased individual, means— 

24 (A) the spouse, parent, brother, sister, or 

25 adult child of the individual; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2433 IH

1 (B) an adult person to whom the indi2 vidual stands in loco parentis; or 

3 (C) any other adult person— 

4 (i) living in the household of the indi5 vidual at the time of the death of the indi6 vidual; and 

7 (ii) related to the individual by blood 

8 or marriage. 

9 (3) The term ‘‘registered individual’’ means an 

10 individual registered with the burn pit registry. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS