alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

WASHINGTON, D.C.

June 20, 2019

Mr. Carl Bailey

Mr. Robert Cleary

Board of Trustees of the Western Pennsylvania Teamsters & Employers Pension Fund 

900 Parish Street, Suite 101

Pittsburgh, PA 15220

Re: Western Pennsylvania Teamsters & Employers Pension Fund (Fund)

Application for Reduction of Benefits

Dear Mr. Bailey and Mr. Cleary:

On May 7, 2019, you were notified that the Secretary of the Treasury (Treasury), in consultation 

with the Secretary of Labor (DOL) and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), had 

reviewed your application (Application) for a reduction in benefits, which was submitted on 

September 24, 2018, and determined that the Application satisfied the requirements of 

subparagraphs (C), (D), (E), and (F) of section 432(e)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), 

which were added to the Code by the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (MPRA). The 

notification explained that, as required under MPRA, before any benefit reduction could go into 

effect, Treasury would administer a vote of eligible participants and beneficiaries to approve or 

reject the proposed benefit reduction.

The voting period began on May 23, 2019, and ended on June 13, 2019. The Fund identified 

21,460 participants and beneficiaries as eligible to vote. Of the voters identified by the Fund who 

received a ballot, 7,133 (or 33.65 percent of all eligible voters) voted to reject the benefit reduction, 

2,265 voted to approve the benefit reduction, and 11,801 did not return a ballot. Because a 

majority of voters identified as eligible by the Fund did not vote to reject the benefit reduction, the 

benefit reduction is permitted to go into effect. Treasury, in consultation with DOL and PBGC, 

has issued a final authorization to reduce benefits under the Fund as described in the Application, 

effective August 1, 2019, subject to the conditions described below.

Under MPRA, the Fund’s ability to reduce benefits is conditioned on the Fund’s compliance with 

subparagraphs (C) and (E) of section 432(e)(9). Under subparagraph (C), after the benefit 

reduction goes into effect, the Fund’s plan sponsor must make an annual determination that, 

despite all reasonable measures to avoid insolvency, the Fund is projected to become insolvent 

unless a benefit reduction continues. The Fund’s plan sponsor must maintain a written record of 

these annual determinations, and this record must include a description of the factors considered to 

determine whether all reasonable measures have been taken to avoid insolvency. The written 

record must be made available to participants and beneficiaries. If the Fund’s plan sponsor fails to 

satisfy the annual plan sponsor determination requirement for a plan year (including maintaining 

the written record), then the reduction of benefits will expire as of the first day of the following 

plan year.1

 

 1 26 C.F.R. § 1.432(e)(9)-1(c)(5).
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-170177) pertaining to the SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd. 2010 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan of SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd of our report dated March 10, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.












/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


MetroPark, New Jersey


March 10, 2011
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ELM ER RO D O FO A LV A RES RI V A S, ak a E l m er R o d o l fo A l v arez-R i v as, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72373 A ge nc yN o. A 099- 465- 462 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E l m e rR odol f

o A l var e s R i va s , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e d e c is io n o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls d is m is s in g h is



# FI LED SEP 21 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72373 2 appe a l f r om the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de ni a l of hi s appl i c a t i ons f

ora s y l um and w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. W e r e je c t A lv ar e s R iv a s ’s c la im th a t h e is e lig ib le f o ra s y lu m b a s e do n h is m e m be r s hi p i n apart i c ul ars oc i a l gr oup, na m e l ypubl i c tr ans port a t i on dr i ve r s w ho r e s is t g an g e x to rtio n . See B arri os v. H older , 581 F . 3d 849, 854- 56 ( 9th C i r . 2009) (r ej ec t i ng as a part i cul arsoci algrou p “ youn g m al es i n G uat em al a w ho ar e t ar get ed for gang recrui tm entbu tre fuse because they di sa gree w i th the gang ’ s c ri m i nal a c tiv itie s ” ) ; Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 542 F . 3d 738, 745- 46 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( r e je c tin g a s as o c ia l g r o up “y o u n g m e n in E l S a lv a d o rr e s is tin g g an g v io le n c e ” ) . W e a l s o r e

j e c tA l var e s R i va s ’ s a s y l um c l a i m ba s e d on hi s ant i - gang e xt ort i on p o litic a l o p in io n . See I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 502 U . S . 478, 482- 84 ( 1992) ; B arr i os , 581 F . 3d a t854- 56. B e c aus e A l var e s R i va s f a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e tha the w a s p e r s e c u te do n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d , w e d e n yth e p e titio n a s to h is a s y lu m an dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s . I

d. a t856. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### Eugene VREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-79.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 9, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000022301
<NAME> COMCAST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             576
<SECURITIES>                                     3,872
<RECEIVABLES>                                      722
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (141)
<INVENTORY>                                        414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,721
<PP&E>                                           7,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,945)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,587
<BONDS>                                          8,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              592
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           903
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,032
<SALES>                                          5,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,811
<CGS>                                          (1,544)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (5,858)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (507)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,254 <F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (906)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (19)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,243
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.32
<FN>
<F1>
Income before income tax expense and other items excludes the effect of
minority interests, net of tax, of $86.7.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2386 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2386

    To authorize appropriations for the maritime environmental and 
         technical assistance program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

Mr. Carbajal (for himself and Mr. Gibbs) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize appropriations for the maritime environmental and 
         technical assistance program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding the Maritime Environmental 
and Technical Assistance Program''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENTAL 
              AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Maritime environmental and technical assistance 
        program.--There are authorized to be appropriated to the 
        Department of Transportation for fiscal year 2022, for expenses 
        necessary to support the maritime environmental and technical 
        assistance program under section 50307 of title 46, United 
        States Code, $6,000,000, of which $3,000,000 shall be used for 
        activities related to technologies that support port and vessel 
        air emissions reductions and to support zero emissions 
        technologies.
            (2) Availability.--Amounts appropriated pursuant to 
        paragraph (1) shall remain available until expended.
    (b) Uses.--Section 50307 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Uses.--The results of activities conducted under subsection 
(b)(1) shall be used to inform the policy decisions of the United 
States related to domestic regulations and to the United States 
position on matters before the International Maritime Organization.''; 
and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Air Emissions Defined.--In this section, the term `air 
emissions' means release into the air of--
            ``(1) air pollutants, as such term is defined in section 
        302 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7602); or
            ``(2) gases listed in section 731(2) of the Global 
        Environmental Protection Assistance Act of 1989 (22 U.S.C. 
        7901(2)).''.
                                 <all>
```
SERVED: JUNE 11,2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS .. t i 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CHRISTINE CLOUD 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0321 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013NM730043) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

_... .. / ......... --:~:~--······-·"'''"_ . .,.. ... -

(_____ -...... ,. __ 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY · 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independen;ce A venue, S. W. 

Washington, D<P 20591 

Attention: E:Iearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Christine Cloud, Respondent 

12661 Tanada Circle, Apt. 2 

Anchorage, AK 99515 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attomer . Office of the Regwnal Counsel 

Federal Aviati(l)n Administration 

222 West 7th Avenue # 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0321 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
Exhibit 31.2

﻿

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

﻿

I, Douglas L. Martin, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

|  | 1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (the “registrant”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017; |
|--|----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 1. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: January 23, 2018

 

﻿

| ﻿                |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Douglas L. Martin   |
| Douglas L. Martin       |
| Chief Financial Officer |

﻿

----
ARTMENT OF 

ASPORTATION 

n' OPERATIONS MoumrinAirServkwLLC ^EU| PX>.Baxl8S 

^ g ^ ^^'^' ^3 A R-52 Ceii:(304)ri^l« 

^^„ ^ Plione: (304yi69*1979 

ySif^fT^ ^ Fix:(304>2»O00 

Dmg Abetoimit Program ?olky Diviskm: N4ay, 16,2011 

Mountata Air Services LLC fa a fligiitaeivkcscoaipBny fa Badthai^ ^ 

fa a lettar daied November 2,2009 we wei» granted exemption firom ^ 

Federal Regulations to allow our 91.147 safety sensitive personnel to be included fa 

tiie testing of our Part 135 Drug u d Alcohol Testing Program. 

I am writing to day to ask fin-an extension of Eicmplioa No. 9556, 

Rapdatoiy Docket No. FAA-2M9-M67, wfaidi is cunendy due to expire on 

October 31,2011. 

Our recpiest ibr extension of thfa exemption is based on the same premise of 

our original request Mountafa Air Services LLC b a small company with only lour 

personnel fa safety sensitive fimctioos. Operating under the exemption has 

significantiy eased the financial and administfative burden of having to opemte two 

.SjBpqige programs for the same four fadividuals. We feel tiiat our aibility to operate 

under one program has caused no risk to the safety of the operation or die public, 

Y^iich we tierve. 

Your constderationoftfais extension is gieatiy appreciated. If you have any 

questions regaidfag tins request, or need fuither clarificilion please contact our 

office at die nun^iers listed idx>ve. 

. *.' Sinrareiy,i ,,. ,>i^. jou w ^...wir;/ ...>.un jjs/x-ry/ 

japanM^iwv 

)|ii6cU)r of Operations %n.y .xiuqi/iqiujf.^- //.' nmon^.:) >•> '• 

• •'-rn;r.f!Oi..x to !«i;oM om. ^ r m'M9i > '^oi^'Mii^r. bc,i£fmur.\ fo pc i:jc|nqcn M 

T/MW M t /AGLC ST.3UiGU Cyr,»L ..{lOU JV)»
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          19,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  673,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    522,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,290,600
<PP&E>                                       1,608,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               (906,700)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,832,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,203,800
<BONDS>                                      2,025,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       615,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,551,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,832,100
<SALES>                                      2,769,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,769,300
<CGS>                                        1,863,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,863,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                323,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   116,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            207,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                  84,200
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   291,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.45
        

</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32145]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-2-110-002]

Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

December 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 1, 1997, Iroquois Gas Transmission 
System, L.P. (Iroquois) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Fifth Revised Sheet No. 48. The 
proposed effective date of this revised tariff sheet is December 1, 
1997.
    Iroquois states that the instant filing is submitted to comply with 
the Commission's November 18, 1997 letter order in the captioned 
proceeding. That order accepted a proposed change in the deferred asset 
surcharge, but required Iroquois to update the zonal allocation factors 
set forth on Sheet No. 48 to reflect the zonal allocation factors 
underlying the currently effective rates. The instant filing complies 
with that order. Iroquois requests a waiver of Section 154.207 of the 
Commission's regulations to permit the tariff sheet to become effective 
on December 1, 1997.
    Iroquois states that copies of its filing were served on all 
parties, all jurisdictional customers and all interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All such protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32145 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Flightline Ground, Inc. 

Complainant 

V. 

Louisiana Department Of Transportation And 

Development, As Successor To The Louisiana 

Division Of Administration And The Board Of 

Commissioners For The Management Of The 

Lakefront Airport; Non-Flood Protection Asset 

Management Authority, As Successor To The 

Board Of Commissioners Of The Orleans Parish 

Levee District And Orleans Parish Levee District, 

Division Of Non-Flood Assets. 

Respondent 

FAA Docket No. 16-11-01 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended 

to on or about January 16, 2015. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

?JA4& t:7{?P Eduardo A. An;: 

Associate Administrator 

for Airports 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

'(L---

1 HEREBY CERTIFY that on De(!_ ( ( 2014, I caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of 

Time addressed to: 

Complainant 

Alan Annstrong 

Attorney at Law 

2900 Chamblee Tucker Road 

Building 5, Suite 350 

Atlanta, GA 30341 

Counsel for Respondent 

Brandon Brown, Esq. 

General Counsel 

Louisiana Department of Transportation and 

Development 

1201 Capital Access Road 

Office S304/S305 

Baton Rouge, LA 70804 

Gerald G. Metzger, Esq. 

Charles Curtis, Esq. 

Metzger Law Firm 

829 Baronne Street 

New Orleans, LA 70113 

Hand Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

FAA Southwest Region, ASW-600 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis