alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### REASON FOR ISSUE: To revise the task interval for discard task 52 − 11 − 41 − 101* (was 1500 L COMPONENT). 

### ACTION: Replace task 52 − 11 − 41 − 101* with the task that follows: Source Document Ref. No. Chapter 5 Task No. Task Title Task Interval RBR − C700 − 301

Rev. AK − 1 52 − 11 − 41 − 101 * (one star) Discard the Passenger Door Tensator Spring, Part No. GS321 − 0580 − 1 PHASE − IN: For aircraft with passenger door tensator springs with more than 550 Landings COMPONENT, as of the date of TL/MC Temporary Revision 5 − 2 − 13 (Jun 04/2014), this task must be accomplished within 6 Months from the date of TR 5 − 2 − 13 or 1500 Landings COMPONENT, whichever comes first. 650 L COMPONENTJun 04/20145−10−11Page 1 of 1PART 2TR 5−2−13BD−700 TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5 − 2 − 13 INSERT IN SECTION 5 − 10 − 11 FACING PAGE 4

NOTE: Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of this manual and LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of Part 2.EFFECTIVITY: ALL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondents

 v.

SAHEED O. SAUNDERS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 387 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 12

COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (in thousands except ratio data)

|                                            | Year Ended December 31, | TwelveMonthsEnded
|------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | -----------------
|
|Fixed Charges:                              |                         |                  
|Interest on First Mortgage Bonds            |                         | $43,207          
|Interest on Other Long-term Debt            |                         | 25,878           
|Interest on Short-term Debt                 |                         | 2,460            
|Miscellaneous Interest Charges              |                         | 4,659            
|Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals |                         | 4,600            
|                                            |                         |                  
|Total Fixed Charges                         |                         | $80,804          
|                                            |                         |                  
|Earnings:                                   |                        
|Income Before Extraordinary Item and        |                        
|Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change      |                         | $150,270         
|Plus Federal Income Taxes                   |                         | 82,686           
|Plus State and Local Income Taxes (Credits) |                         | 89               
|Plus Fixed Charges (as above)               |                         | 80,804           
|                                            |                         |                  
|Total Earnings                              |                         | $313,849         
|                                            |                         |                  
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          |                         | 3.88             
|                                            |                         |
Southwest Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Plan 

Checklist Item #33 

Does the application include the required retiree representative information (if applicable)? See Section 

7.03. 

Not Applicable. The Southwest Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Plan is not a plan described 

in Internal Revenue Code Section 432(e)(9)(B)(v)(I); thus, a retiree representative is not required to be 

appointed. 

Document #33 - I - 

SWORCCPP-000176
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the
Report), we, Robert S. Benou Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company and Marc Benou, the Chief Operating Officer, President and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|Dated: March 15, 2007 |  |  | /s/ Robert Benou                                | 
|--------------------- |  |  | ----------------------------------------------- | 
|                      |  |  | Name: Robert Benou                              | 
|                      |  |  | Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief | 
|                      |  |  | Financial Officer and Treasurer                 | 
|                     
|                     
|Dated: March 15, 2007 |  |  | /s/ Marc Benou                                  | 
|                      |  |  | Name: Marc Benou                                | 
|                      |  |  | Title: Chief Operating Officer, President and   | 
|                      |  |  | Secretary                                       | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 2, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc., Sidney, Illinois; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of CIB Bank (in organization), 
Indianapolis, Indiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 4, 
1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32219 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31670]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
NW., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Agreement No.: 202-010689-068.
Title: Transpacific Westbound Rate Agreement (``TWRA'').
Parties:
    American President Lines, Ltd.
    Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie GmbH
    Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.
    Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.
    Nippon Yusen Kaisha Line
    Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.
    P&O Nedlloyd Limited
    P&O Nedlloyd Lijnen, B.V.
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.
Synopsis: The proposed modification authorizes the parties to consider 
and act upon proposals and recommendations of the Equipment Interchange 
Discussion Agreement (FMC Agreement No. 202-011284) with respect to 
activities within the scope of the TWRA agreement.

    Dated: November 26, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31670 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

GRAHAM GEORGE CULLIFORD, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.  No. 02-1698

GLEN QUEEN,

Defendant-Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City.

Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge.

(CA-01-221-2-T)

Submitted: October 17, 2002

Decided: November 6, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Graham George Culliford, Appellant Pro Se. Fred Henry Moody, Jr.,

MCKEEVER, EDWARDS, DAVIS & HAYS, P.A., Bryson City,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Graham George Culliford appeals the district court’s order dismissing his slander of title action without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(b)(6). We vacate the district court’s order and remand for further

proceedings. 

Generally, a dismissal without prejudice is not an appealable order.

See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d

1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). However, because no amendment of

Culliford’s complaint would permit his action to proceed, we find the

order of dismissal appealable. Id.

The district court dismissed Culliford’s complaint for lack of diversity jurisdiction. The court found that Culliford is an alien admitted

to the United States as a permanent resident. It accordingly concluded

that Culliford is a citizen of North Carolina for diversity purposes. We

have reviewed the record and find inadequate support for the district

court’s finding that Culliford is a permanent resident of the United

States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Foy v. Schantz, Schatzman & Aaronson, P.A., 108 F.3d 1347, 1349 (11th Cir. 1997). We therefore vacate

the district court’s order and remand for reconsideration of whether

diversity jurisdiction exists.*

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED

*We express no opinion as to whether diversity jurisdiction is present

or, if so, whether the district court may decline to exercise jurisdiction

on abstention grounds. 

2 CULLIFORD v. QUEEN
Exhibit
99.1.2  Certification
Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Joan S. Freilich, the Chief Financial Officer of
Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Companys 
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,
which this statement accompanies, (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.   /s/ Joan S.
  FreilichJoan S. FreilichDated:
  May 15, 2003   A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

LINDELL MCFADDEN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4303 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 9, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

SET FOR SUBMISSION ON ORAL ARGUMENT WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2015

AT 9:00 A.M.

(Before Chief Justice Brian Quinn, Justice Mackey K. Hancock, Justice Patrick A. Pirtle)

07-14-00318-CR Danny Oltivero v. The State of Texas Deaf Smith County

Frank Jackson, Edgar A. Mason – Appellant O/A Requested

Chris Strowd, Assistant O/A Requested

 District Attorney – State

07-14-00333-CR The State of Texas v. Sammy Carl Williams Lynn County

Michael Munk, District Attorney O/A Requested

Jason Bujnosek, Assistant District Attorney

 – State

THE LAW OFFICE OF ALLISON CLAYTON O/A Requested

 (Allison Clayton)

MARK SNODGRASS LAW OFFICE

 (Mark S. Snodgrass)

 – Appellee

07-14-00345-CR Marc Allen Mason v. The State of Texas Randall County

Eric Coats – Appellant O/A Requested

 

Kristy Wright, Assistant District O/A Requested

Attorney – State
Statement by the United States

Proposed Loan – Air Quality Improvement in the Greater Beijing – Tianjin – Hebei Region

Regional Emission-Reduction and Pollution-Control Facility

(People’s Republic of China)

December 14, 2017

On behalf of the United States, we wish to thank staff for the useful pre-Board meeting, as well

as for their responsiveness to information requests.

This project is the third in a series of interventions to improve air quality in the Beijing-TainjinHebei region. The United States abstained on the first two projects in accordance with U.S.

legislative requirements to support only projects that meet the ‘basic human needs’ of the poor, as

most of the provinces in this region are not among the poorest in China. This project, however,

raises concerns beyond those related to the legislative requirements.

The project provides almost half a billion dollars for the establishment of the Regional-Emission

Reduction and Pollution-Control Facility (RERPCF). The RERPCF will be housed within and

controlled by the China Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Group (CECEP), one

of the largest state-owned enterprises (SOE) in China, with total assets of almost $22 billion.

The RERPCF will provide debt and equity for eligible subprojects to increase the use of technology

in energy production and energy efficiency, including through technology- or industry-specific

funds that target high-polluting sectors such as steel and iron production. Ansteel Group, one of

the largest steel producers in China with annual production capacity of 33.2 million tons, is

expected to contribute 100 million yuan to an industry-specific fund alongside RERPCF. Ansteel

has identified more than 80 potential subprojects for investment in the region, many of which will

be with its own subsidiary companies. The United States notes that none of these subprojects

will be rated Category A for environment.

In light of coordinated multilateral action through the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity, the 

United States questions the appropriateness of ADB’s investments in and support to the steel

sector in China. While ADB staff have stated that this project will not increase the overall

capacity of the beneficiary steel producers, these new technologies will introduce process

efficiencies and ADB funding will make clean energy investments on behalf of SOEs in the steel

industry. Further, the United States Department of Commerce has initiated anti-dumping and

countervailing duty orders against Ansteel Group and its subsidiaries for certain steel products.

While the government’s efforts to improve air quality and reduce CO2 emissions are

commendable, the United States cannot support public resources financing investments that

benefit a large, state-owned steel producer that is subject to anti-dumping measures, in

contravention of the objectives of the Global Forum.

Thus, the United States wishes to be recorded as voting ‘no’ on the recommendation in paragraph

47 of the R-paper.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
#### Pedro BARRUETA, Appellant, v. SEAFERRO COMPANY, a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-915.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 5, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Connecticut Department of

’ENERGY &

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION

79 Elm Street o Hartford, CT 06~06-5].27 www.ct~gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer

David Cm~roy, Chief

Air Programs Branch

EPA Region I

5 Post Office Squm’e - Suite 100

Mail Code OEP05-02

Boston, MA 02t09-3912

July 8, 2013

Dear Mr. Cortroy,

In a document dated December 1, 2004, the Connecticut Department of Energy and

Envirolm~ental Protection (DEEP) submitted several regulations to you for approval into the

State Implementation Plan (SIP), including section 22a-174-18 of the Regulations of Connecticut

State Agencies (RCSA) as revised effective April 1, 2004. On January 14, 2013, DEEP

submitted a supplement to you addressing how the April 1, 2004 version of RCSA section 22a174-t8 meets the requirements of section 110(1) of the Clean Air Act.

DEEP would like to modify the submittal of RCSA section 22a-174-18 by withdrawing one

provision from consideration as part of the SIP. Specifically, DEEP is withdrawing the pt~rase

"and malfunction" from subsection (j)(1). A copy of RCSA section 22a-174-18 with the

withdrawn portion indicated in strikethrough font is included as Attachment A to this letter.

If you have any questions, please contact Merrily Gere of my staff at (860) 424-3416.

Sincerely yours,

Anne R. Gobin

Chief, Bureau of Air Management

cc: Anne Arnold, EPA Region 1
Exhibit 99.9











KPMG LLP

205 5th Avenue SW

Suite 3100

Calgary AB

T2P 4B9

Telephone (403) 691-8000

Fax (403) 691-8008

www.kpmg.ca





Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd.



We consent to the use of our reports, each dated March 14, 2017,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in
this annual report on Form 40-F.



We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports
in the Registration Statement (No. 333-211466) on Form F-10 of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd.



/s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants



March 17, 2017

Calgary, Canada
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and statements of income of Dunes Hotels and
Casinos Inc., as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 1997, and is
qualified in its entirety be reference to such financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,092
<SECURITIES>                                     1,678
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,023
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                     482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                         3,900
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,029
<SALES>                                          7,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,966
<CGS>                                            6,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    97
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (53)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (920)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>