alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY OLNLRAL OF TEXAU 

’ AUSTIN 
litsare vootl~ in 0.d ouloalsslonor ‘hall ftmotl-am, ri$;hU and lhbllltbs 

heroaitrr, vest in and be bd and prior& by the Crraatsslcnor or A~~Oulturo, The Yuk8ta 

aad Wrohowr Daportrtaant MU the X'eli-htr and 

Boor-•UFM 3~ rtrmt oi thr Stetr of Tuer are 

hereby abol r shad snd the dutlna arid fumtions 

of the M3o .hEli h?mmfteT Voet ln thr Cm81111810n.r of &.rlaultun.* 

Mtlslo 8490, Rsvlord Clvll Statute8 of Tenast 

*All publAo wel&borr or deputy pub110 

wl.$~erm, appointad or aleoted oh411 obtain 

iron the Coarir8icncr of tk&:etr an4 nereh3r\oor 

a aortltloats of authority to O&my or! the 

humlnQo8 of p.tblia ws?&or or d*p!At pub110 

wolghor vfthir. the olty tom, prrec I nat or 

ⅈ, ing pclnt fcr v-510X !m ues elected or 

eppo i atsb.” 

Artlclr 5693, .RilV?Src? Civil sC,!ltQt0e oi TcxCrr: 

'The Ca.7r=.lcsl;,?nr c: ::-~.rk!:cts act ;:Brchcwor rhall issue s oortlflatto of auttorlty 

to all gereoze r?gpge3 ir t.ho bwisorr ei 

wd:,:hini; for the publlol CEreftily and GCO'Jretaly tost all males, velgbtn, beaaa er.6 

memres, us& by such c7ubllc vd$x~rs at 

best ante every twlvvr wmthe, an6 chtrca suoh 

bllo velP&er 8 fw of rlvr dollers far 8wh 

of the aert.itiO~te of euthorlty 18 :asusd to 

my publio r&$er or deptp pbllc vsL:Ler 

in thZ:r State, nnd ouch is6 ohtill be aollecf- 

~4 l xuelly thrrmrter iron! cl1 ;nrsosi ezgr~;at7ed inthe buslnerr of ,-ubllc wel+zher,” 

Wer Artlclr 5498 it 18 a; zar4nt thzt 1t 18 tti 

duty af the COIS&#~O~OP et &ZietituM t0 WkO ~3 l IXU9l in8?QCtiOKi rd; telt Of al1 8OalQlI Witi:$t8, beam @-ti nibtiltS 

uasd by jubllo wal&err a~d thsk deputirn. Rowvw, whom
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the annual
period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Christopher M. Mathieu, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|/s/ Christopher M. Mathieu |                        
|-------------------------- | -----------------------
|Name:                      | Christopher M. Mathieu 
|Title:                     | Chief Financial Officer



Date: March 8, 2016
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10171 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY SALAZAR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-113-1 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Salazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U .S. 738 (1967). Salazar has filed a response. Salazar also has moved for appointment of new counsel and leave to proceed pro se. Salazar’s motions are DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Salazar’s response United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10171

2 discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave towithdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64436-64437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 191; Collaborative Decisionmaking and 
Near-Term Procedures

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the 
Special Committee 191 meeting to be held January 6, 1998, starting at 
10:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; 
(2) Old Business/Action Items; (3) RTCA Special Committee 191 Scope and 
Structure Briefing; (4) User Perspective Briefing; (5) Working Group 
Charters, Progress, and Status (NAS Status Information, CDM, 
Collaborative Routing); (6) Review of Action Items; (7) Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.


[[Page 64437]]


    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 28, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-31934 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 9 , 2023

In The


## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00703

- CV

PRIMEX CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. AND ERIC GAROFANO , Appellant s

V.

DANA GORDON D/B/A IGNITE, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- 41359

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed September 19 , 20 22 . The clerk’s

record was filed November 29 , 20 22

. The reporter’s record was filed October 3

, 2022. No brief was filed

.

On March 23, 20 2 3 , this court issued an order stating that unless appellant s

filed a brief on or before April 24

, 20 2 3 , the appeal was subject to dismissal

without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).2

Appellant s filed no b ri ef or other response. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan , an d Poissant

.
Exhibit 8.1




LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES




Name of Subsidiary

Country of IncorporationSpring Health Solutions Ltd.

IsraelG-Sense Ltd.

IsraelSpring-Set Heath Solutions Ltd.

IsraelNextGen Biomed Ltd.(1)

IsraelSindolor Holdings Ltd.(1)(2)

IsraelSindolor Medical Ltd.(1)(2)

IsraelSpring Health Solutions Inc.(3)

Delaware, U.S.





(1) On May 30, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement with Shai Sapir Investments Ltd. for the sale of our entire holdings in NextGen Biomed Ltd. ("NextGen"). The closing of this sale agreement is expected to occur by June 30, 2011, following which we will no longer own shares of NextGen and its subsidiaries, Sindolor Holdings Ltd. and Sindolor Medical Ltd.




(2)Sindolor Holdings Ltd. is a wholly owned subsidiary of NextGen, and it owns 66.45% of Sindolor Medical Ltd.'s share capital (on a fully diluted basis).




(3)  Sindolor Health Solutions Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Spring Health Solutions Ltd.
Treasury approves Nebraska’s plan to invest $87.7 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-speed internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Nebraska

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

 Program Summary: $87.7 million for Broadband Infrastructure (68% of CPF allocation)

 Locations to Be Served: 21,000 (estimated)

 Program Description: The Nebraska Broadband Bridge 

Program, a competitive grant program, will award grants for

broadband infrastructure. The program is designed to reach in 

areas without access to reliable, affordable high-speed 

internet service, especially the state’s rural areas. 

‒ The Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program is designed to provide internet service with 

speeds of 100/100 Mbps symmetrical to households and businesses upon project 

completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the Nebraska Broadband Bridge Program 

will participate in the FCC’s Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month 

subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: Nebraska Department of Economic Development

Nebraska Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Nebraska, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve 23% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.
H. R. 208 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-one 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 500 West 

Main Street, Suite 102 in Tupelo, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Colonel Carlyle ‘Smitty’ 

Harris Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. COLONEL CARLYLE ‘‘SMITTY’’ HARRIS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 500 West Main Street, Suite 102 in Tupelo, 

Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Colonel Carlyle 

‘Smitty’ Harris Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Colonel Carlyle ‘Smitty’ Harris Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

## Water Analysis
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 4/26/2012 Sample Number: 121733-001 Date Collected:04/18/2012 08:00 Date Received:4/18/2012 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 404 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/23/2012 14:00 

### Sample Number: 121733-002 Date Collected:04/18/2012 08:00 Date Received:4/18/2012 

## 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 4.2 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/23/2012 14:05 

### Sample Number: 121733-003 Date Collected:04/18/2012 08:00 Date Received:4/18/2012 

## Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 1.2 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/23/2012 14:10

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 121733 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10325

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICHARD KEITH DOYLE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CR-11

Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Keith Doyle appeals the sentence he received upon revocation of

his term of supervised release. He argues that the sentence is unreasonable

because it exceeds the sentencing range recommended by the relevant policy

statements in the Sentencing Guidelines and because the district court failed to

specify its reasons for the sentence. The Government has moved to dismiss the

appeal or for summary affirmance on the basis that we lack jurisdiction to

consider it under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(4). Because Doyle cannot prevail on the
No. 06-10325

2

merits of his appeal, we pretermit consideration of the jurisdictional issue. See

United States v. Weathersby, 958 F.2d 65, 66 (5th Cir. 1992). 

Doyle incorrectly asserts that the district court failed to provide sufficient

justification for the sentence. The court stated that it read his background

information in the Presentence Report (PSR) and that it considered the evidence,

the violation, Doyle’s admission of the violation, the arguments of counsel, and

the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in determining the sentence.

According to the PSR, Doyle has a criminal history of category VI, the result of

12 convictions for crimes such as passing worthless checks, stealing cars,

burglary, embezzlement, assault, and possession of cocaine. The PSR also

described additional arrests for crimes such as going AWOL from the military,

forgery, theft, and child molestation. In announcing the sentence, the district

court explained that it considered the policy statements and the recommended

sentencing range of 8-14 months, but they “[did] not begin to address” Doyle’s

conduct. Accordingly, Doyle’s 24-month sentence was reasonable and was not

imposed in violation of law. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119-20

(5th Cir. 2005). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and the Government’s

motions are DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-32: OTS No. 3780]


Wyman Park Federal Savings and Loan Association, Lutherville, MD; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on October 9, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Wyman Park Federal Savings and Loan Association, Lutherville, Maryland, 
to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, and the 
Southeast Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1475 Peachtree 
Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30309.

    Dated: November 13, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30264 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Exhibit 31.1.2 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

CON EDISON—Principal Financial Officer 

 

I, Joan S. Freilich, the principal financial officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 of Consolidated Edison, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.] 

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:November 5, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental Research; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Dental Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meetings:

    Name of SEP: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel--Review of F32 grants (98-15).
    Dates: December 2, 1997.
    Time: 12:00 noon.
    Place: Natcher Building, Rm. 4AN-44F, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 (teleconference).
    Contact Person: Dr. George Hausch, Chief, Grants Review Section, 
4500 Center Drive, Natcher Building, Room 4AN-44F, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-2372.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.

    Name of SEP: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel--Review of R01 grant (98-17).
    Dates: December 10, 1997.
    Time: 12:00 noon.
    Place: Natcher Building, Rm. 4AN-44F, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 (teleconference).
    Contact Person: Dr. Philip Washko, Scientist Review 
Administrator, 4500 Center Drive, Natcher Building, Room 4AN-44F, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2372.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.

    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research)

    Dated: November 3, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29671 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER ROSS HECKER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 37 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of June, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ IN RE ROGER BLAIR

__________________________ 2013

- 15 91

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Off ice, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 11 / 783 ,909

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Roger Blair moves to withdraw his ap peal

. Upon consideration thereof,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. Th e appeal is di s missed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs

. Case: 13-1591 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 09/16/2013IN RE B LAIR 2

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

ISSUED AS A M ANDATE : September 16, 2013

s21 Case: 13-1591 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 09/16/2013
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     Officer Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Pampa Energía S.A., a sociedad anónima organized under the laws of Argentina (the "Company"), does hereby certify to such officer's knowledge that:  The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:   June 28, 2011

   By:/s/ Ricardo Alejandro Torres

   Name:  Ricardo Alejandro TorresTitle:     Chief Executive Officer
    Date:   June 28, 2011

   By:/s/ Roberto Luis Maestretti

   Name:Roberto Luis MaestrettiTitle:     Chief Financial Officer
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---