alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                        UT

<LEGEND>                         The Schedule Contains Summary Financial
                                 Information Extracted From Consolidated
                                 Balance  Sheet,  Income  Statement and
                                 Statement Of Cash Flows And  Is  Qualified
                                 In Its Entirety By Reference to Such Financial
                                 Statements And The Notes Thereto.

<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                     Sep-30-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                     Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>        11,149,758

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>      230,789

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>           1,394,031

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>         615,945

<OTHER-ASSETS>                   930,681

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   14,321,204

<COMMON>                         587,583

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>        855,008

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>              4,469,185

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>   5,911,776

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            84,550

<PREFERRED>                      237,794

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>             4,288,837

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>               0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>        0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>   0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>    102,630

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>        0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>      40,575

<LEASES-CURRENT>                 2,757

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>   3,652,285

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>   14,321,204

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>        5,401,190

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>             305,780

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>       4,279,973

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>       4,585,753

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>          815,437

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>               1,014

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>   816,451

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>         247,239

<NET-INCOME>                     569,212

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>      13,808

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>    555,404

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>         370,155

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>        315,663

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>           961,868

<EPS-PRIMARY>                    2.36

<EPS-DILUTED>                    2.36


</TABLE>
256 La. 1156

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Van Vincent CHEATHAM v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51011.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 25, 1970.

In re: Van Vincent Cheatham applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writs denied: The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant the exercise of either our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
Treasury approves Vermont’s plan to invest $15.9 million of CPF funding in 

multi-purpose community facilities to improve resources for communities 

that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Vermont

 

▪ Program Summary: $15.9 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (14% of 

CPF allocation)

▪ Program Description: Vermont’s Libraries Capital

Project program is a competitive grant program that

provides funding to public libraries in need of critical

upgrades and improvements that will enable

community members to access high-speed internet

and digital devices. The program will prioritize public

libraries that serve communities with low levels of access to high-speed internet 

and low rates of computer ownership in the home.

▪ Key State Contact: The Vermont Department of Libraries

Vermont’s Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Vermont estimates this 

program will fund 

improvements to at least 

20 libraries, serving 

approximately 200,000 

Vermonters across the 

state
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-1740

___________

Steven M. Jacob; Dan Meis, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Robert Houston, in his individual and *

official capacity as Director of the * [UNPUBLISHED]

Nebraska Department of Correctional *

Services; Nebraska Department of *

Correctional Services, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: July 5, 2007 

Filed: July 10, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Steven Jacob and Daniel Meis are serving sentences of life imprisonment in

Nebraska for first-degree murder. They filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, claiming

that denying them eligibility for parole violated the Due Process Clause of the

Fourteenth Amendment, the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and
1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of Nebraska. 

-2-

unusual punishment, and the Ex Post Facto Clause. The district court1

 found plaintiffs

had stated no federal claim, dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6), and later denied plaintiffs’ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)

motion to alter or amend the judgment. Upon de novo review of the dismissal, see

Federer v. Gephardt, 363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review), we agree

with the district court that plaintiffs failed to state any federal claim, see Whisman v.

Rinehart, 119 F.3d 1303, 1312 (8th Cir. 1997) (alleged violation of state law does not

by itself state claim under § 1983). The court also properly refused to enter a default

judgment, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A); did not err in substituting Robert Houston

for Harold Clarke; and did not abuse its discretion in denying the Rule 59(e) motion,

see Flannery v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 160 F.3d 425, 427-28 (8th Cir. 1998)

(standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending

motion to supplement. 

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-78-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

November 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 12, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT), 525 Milam Street, P.O. Box 21734, Shreveport, Louisiana 
71151, filed in Docket No. CP98-78-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for approval to operate certain 
facilities in Arkansas, under NGT's blanket certificate issued in 
Docket Nos. CP82-384-000 and CP82-384-001, pursuant to Section 7(c) of 
the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the request 
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    NGT states that it specifically requests authority pursuant to 
Subpart G of Part 284 of the Commission's Regulations to operate an 
existing one-inch tap originally installed to provide service 
authorized under Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act and Subpart 
B, Part 284 of the Commission's Regulations. NGT further states that 
the one-inch tap, valve and first-cut regulator are located on NGT's 
Line KT-9 in Section 35, Township 18 South, Range 16 West, Union 
County, Arkansas: NGT asserts that the estimated volumes to be 
delivered through the tap are approximately 170 MMBtu annually and 2 
MMBtu on a peak day. NGT indicates that the tap was constructed in 
July, 1997, at an estimated cost of $2,544.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30636 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 15, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00260

- CR

Frank Ricci Flores, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JU STICES GOODWIN AND F IELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and

the parties’ argum ents, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s

judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH et al., Appellants, v. H. George CARRISON, Appellee.

No. GG-143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 13, 1978.

Charles A. Hall, New Smyrna Beach, for appellants.

William L. Durden and George E. Ridge of Kent, Sears, Durden & Kent, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

BOYER, Acting C. J., concurs specially.

BOYER, Acting Chief Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur that the learned trial judge correctly found that the ordinance sought to be imposed by appellant is unconstitutional as applied to appellee’s property. The facts of this case and the law as applied by the trial judge are squarely in line with *Davis v. Sails,*318 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). When a zoning restriction becomes unreasonable or arbitrary as applied to a particular property then that restriction is unconstitutional in its application although the restriction, generally, may not be so defective. *Davis v. Sails,*supra;*Watson v. Mayflower Property, Inc.,*177 So.2d 355 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1965) and *Kugel v. City of Miami Beach,*206 So.2d 282 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1968).
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan of $58 million to Republic Airways, 

Inc. (the Company). Treasury originally agreed to make a loan of up to $77 million to the 

Company, and the Company elected to draw a total of $58 million. The Company is a regional 

passenger air carrier with approximately 6,700 U.S. employees in March 2020. 

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(1) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is secured by spare parts and tooling inventory.

This loan has an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% and matures on November 6, 2025. The 

Company elected to draw a total of $58 million on December 10, 2020. The loan proceeds will 

be used to provide liquidity to continue the Company’s operations. The transaction agreement 

includes covenants by the Company to comply with certain restrictions on employee

compensation, stock repurchases, dividends, and reductions in employment levels, as required by

the CARES Act. Treasury received warrants to purchase common stock equal to 10% of the

total loan amount drawn.
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Oct - Dec

2015 Actual 212 354 (7) 347 135 333 0

Jan - Mar

2016 Actual 266 244 3 247 (20) 314 0

Apr - Jun

2016 Actual (60) (25) 14 (10) 50 364 0

Jul - Sep

2016 Actual 234 222 2 224 (10) 353 0

Oct - Dec

2016 Actual 201 255 (8) 246 46 399 0

Jan - Mar

2017 Actual 335 40 (12) 28 (307) 92 0

Apr - Jun

2017 Actual (75) 35 (22) 14 89 181 0

Jul - Sep

2017 Actual 192 189 (19) 170 (22) 159 0

Oct - Dec

2017 Actual 204 282 (8) 274 70 229 (12)

Jan - Mar

2018 Actual 374 488 (54) 435 61 290 (30)

Apr - Jun

2018 Actual (43) 72 (72) 0 43 333 (48)

Jul - Sep

2018 Actual 212 353 (89) 264 52 385 (66)

Oct - Dec

2018 Actual 291 426 (117) 309 17 402 (91)

Jan - Mar

2019 Actual 375 374 (67) 306 (68) 334 (46)

Apr - Jun

2019 Actual 13 40 (97) (57) (70) 264 (67)

Jul - Sep

2019 Actual 281 440 (40) 400 119 382 (30)

Oct - Dec

2019 Actual 313 330 7 337 23 404 0

Jan - Mar February 3, 2020 363 367 (8) 359 (4) 400 0

2020 Actual 365 477 (1) 476 111 515 0

Forecast Revisions 2 110 7 117 115 115 0

Apr - Jun February 3, 2020 (59) (56) (3) (59) 0 400 0

2020 May 4, 2020 2,627 2,999 (87) 2,911 285 800 0

Forecast Revisions 2,686 3,055 (84) 2,971 285 400 0

Jul - Sep

2020 May 4, 2020 663 677 (14) 663 0 800 0

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
Exhibit 99.1
 
  
 Re:
    
    Evaluation Summary
Postrock Energy Corporation Interests
Proved ReservesAs of December 31, 2010
    ProvedProved
    
    Proved
    
    Developed
    
    ProvedDeveloped
    
    Developed
    
    Non-
    
    Un-Producing
    
    Shut-In
    
    Producing
    
    Developed
    
    ProvedNet ReservesOil/Condensate
    
    - Mbbl
    
    
    707.2
    
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    26.6
    
    
    
    10.5
    
    
    
    744.3Gas
    
    - MMcf
    
    
    99,785.0
    
    
    
    4,338.2
    
    
    
    12,828.3
    
    
    
    13,510.6
    
    
    
    130,462.0RevenueOil/Condensate
    
    
    - M
    
    
    $
    51,916.6
    
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    1,843.0
    
    
    
    755.8
    
    
    
    54,515.4Gas
    
    
    - M
    
    
    $
    429,799.3
    
    
    
    18,307.0
    
    
    
    57,066.7
    
    
    
    58,259.0
    
    
    
    563,432.2Severance and
    
    
    
    
    
    
    22,080.6
    
    
    
    732.3
    
    
    
    2,826.4
    
    
    
    2,453.2
    
    
    
    28,092.4Ad Valorem Taxes
    
    
    - M
    
    
    $
    7,552.9
    
    
    
    180.3
    
    
    
    1,706.8
    
    
    
    1,079.8
    
    
    
    10,519.8Operating Expenses
    
    
    - M
    
    
    $
    162,593.2
    
    
    
    9,410.1
    
    
    
    16,784.2
    
    
    
    15,100.1
    
    
    
    203,887.5Gathering Expenses
    
    
    - M
    
    
    $
    71,984.5
    
    
    
    3,297.0
    
    
    
    8,294.0
    
    
    
    9,613.2
    
    
    
    93,188.8Investments
    
    
    - M
    
    
    $
    0.0
    
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    8,938.5
    
    
    
    18,002.3
    
    
    
    26,940.8Operating Income (BFIT)
    
    
    - M
    
    
    $
    217,504.7
    
    
    
    4,687.4
    
    
    
    20,359.7
    
    
    
    12,766.2
    
    
    
    255,317.8Discounted @ 10%
    
    
    - M
    
    
    $
    155,566.6
    
    
    
    2,606.4
    
    
    
    9,221.5
    
    
    
    1,762.4
    
    
    
    169,156.9




---



##### 








---



##### 



Respectfully submitted,(SIGNATURE)CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-693JZM:rtp
#### Jessie BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-104.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; William G. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.3.2

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Louis M. Bevilacqua, the Chief Financial Officer of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, which this statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/LOUIS M. BEVILACQUALouis M. Bevilacqua
| |  | -----------------------------------------

Dated: May 6, 2004

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael ESSER and Daniel Smith.

No. 53804.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The ruling of the trial court is correct.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



/s/ Cheryl W. Grisé

(Signature)

Cheryl W. Grisé

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ David R. McHale

(Signature)

David R. McHale

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



November 4, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.3





STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Navient Solutions, LLC – Master Servicer

11100 USA Parkway

Fishers, IN 46037

Attention: Jody Sloan



Pursuant to Section 11.03 of the Amended and Restated Omnibus Subservicing Agreement dated February 8, 2016 among Nelnet Servicing, LLC, successor Subservicer to Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc., Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly
          known as Navient Solutions, Inc.) as the master servicer and administrator (the “Servicing Agreement”), the undersigned certifies that (a) a review of the Subservicer’s activities during the period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022,
          and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision; and (b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligation under the Servicing Agreement, in all
          material respects, during such period.



/s/ Joseph E. Popevis

Joseph E. Popevis, President

Nelnet Servicing, LLC









---

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30854]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE


Notice of Transmittal of Final Sequestration Report for Fiscal 
Year 1998 to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget

    Pursuant to Section 254(b) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 904(b)), the Congressional Budget 
Office hereby reports that it has submitted its Final Sequestration 
Report for Fiscal Year 1998 to the House of Representatives, the 
Senate, and the Office of Management and Budget.
Mark G. Desautels,
Assistant for Intergovernmental Relations, Congressional Budget Office.
[FR Doc. 97-30854 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1450-01-M
Air Quality Modeling TSD 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 03/04/2011 04:19 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Kirk Baker 

 

Cortney -- 

Here is the Air Quality Modeling TSD. 

Thanks. 

EPA-454_R-11-003.pdf 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450
FILED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V EN T HC IR C U IT J AN 17, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 17138

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 4 - 0 0 3 6 5 C V- F T M- 2 9 DN F J A ME S B Y R O M, M I S S I O N U N I T Y , I N C ., a F l or i da not - f

or - pr of i tc orpor a t i on, P l ai n t i ffs-A p p el l an t s,

ve r s us C HA R L OT T E C OU NT Y, F L OR I DA , a pol i t i ca l subd i vi si on of the S t at e of F l ori da, D ef endant -A pp el l ee .

________________________ A ppe a l f r om the U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tC our tf orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof

F l or i da

_________________________ ( Jan u ar y 17, 2007) B e f o r e A N D E R S O N , M A R C U S a n d H I L L , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: A f t e ror a l a r gum e nta nd c a r e f ul c ons i de r a t i on, w e c onc l ude tha tthe2

j ud gm entof the di stri ctcourti s due t o b e a ff i rm ed for the re as on s f

ul l y di sc usse d atoral ar gu m ent . W i th res pectt o app el l ant s’ ar gu m entconcerni ng the di stri ct c o u r t’s f a ilu r e to g iv e a p p e lla n ts ’ r e q u e s te d c h a r g e c o n c e r n in g c o m m u n ity pr e j udi c e , w e c onc l ude tha tthe c ha r ge gi ve n by the di s tr i c tc our te nc om pa s s e d the re qu es t ed charge, and t hatappel l ant s have f ai l ed t o p er suade us thatthe j ury m i sund er st oo d t he l aw appl i ca bl e t o t he ca se . W e c anno tconcl ud e thatthe di stri ct c o u r t a b u s e d its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g a p p e lla n ts ’ m o tio n f o ra n e w tr ia l. A pp el l ant s’ ot her a rgum ent s on app ea l ar e r ej ec t ed w i tho utneed for further d is c u s s io n . A cco rd i n g l y, th e j u d g m en to f th e d i stri ctco u rti s A F F I R M E D .
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.    /s/Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  November 7, 2008    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.