alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TOPP IMPORT & EXPORT, INC., Petitioner, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 43904.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1973.

*215PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari, jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Florida Appellate Rule 4.5c(6), 32 F.S.A., and it appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

ERVIN, Justice

(dissenting) :

The District Court, Fla.App., 276 So.2d 221, construed the subject insurance policy against the insured holding that the coverage did not insure against loss to import shipments. The shipments in question had been brought by vessel into the United States at Seattle, Washington in foreign commerce. There they were assembled and became cargo for interstate “piggyback” railroad shipment to New Jersey. True they had not lost their identity as imports for tax purposes, but in the common sense meaning of the insurance policy they were piggy-back cargo shipments moving in interstate commerce at the time the insured suffered their loss by physical damage and theft. The policy excluded “imports” in the sense of cargo being transported in vessels in foreign commerce, but when the “imports” were being transported “piggy-back” they came within the class of any internal shipment of that kind within the intendment of the policy. Any loss that occurred to the insured’s goods while in “piggy-back” transportation was clearly contemplated to fall within the policy’s coverage. Their character as “imports” had changed to that of goods in “piggyback” transport. In any event the policy’s ambiguous stance in the respects noted should have been judicially resolved in in-, sured’s favor.
Treasury approves Ohio’s plan to invest $77.5 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Ohio

 

▪ Program Summary: $77.5 million for Broadband Infrastructure (29% of CPF allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 15,000 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: The Ohio Residential Broadband Expansion

Grant Program (ORBEG) is a competitive broadband grant 

program designed to fund last-mile broadband infrastructure 

projects in rural areas currently lacking access to reliable, 

high-speed internet. CPF funds will be used to expand the 

current state-funded program to serve additional locations.

‒ This program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps to households 

and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Internet service providers utilizing investments funded by CPF will be required to participate in 

the FCC’s Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income 

families. 

▪ Key State Contact: BroadbandOhio, the state broadband office within the Ohio Department of 

Development

Ohio Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Ohio, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~4.5% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.


|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|/s/ | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Chief Executive Officer




|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                  
|    | David R. McHale                                  
|    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 8, 2006  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Commonwealth of Pennsylvania *v.*Hardcastle, Jr., Appellant.

Submitted October 2, 1933.

Before Keller, Cunningham, B'ald-eige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*William C. Alexander,*and with him *John E. Mc-Donough,*for appellant.

*William R. Tool,*Assistant District Attorney, and with him *William J. MacCarter, Jr.,*District Attorney, for appellee.

February 1, 1934:

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This case was submitted with the/ appeal in Com. v. Wilcox, 112 Pa. Superior Ct. 240. It differs from *261that case in no material particular. For the reasons therein recited the appeal is quashed and it is ordered that the record be remitted to the court below and that the defendant appear in said court at such time as he may be there called and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Johnny Lee YOUNGBLOOD v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53843.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Johnny Lee Youngblood applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ granted. See order

On considering the petition of relator in the above numbered and entitled cause:

Ordered that the Honorable Matthew S. Braniff, Judge, Section “B” of the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, grant an evidentiary hearing on relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in that Court and in this Court, and make a determination of the merits of his application after the hearing. It is further Ordered that competent counsel be appointed to represent the relator at this hearing.
Exhibit 15.1








Scorpio Tankers Inc.


9, Boulevard Charles III


Monaco 98000





March 18, 2016





Dear Sir/Madam:





Reference is made to the annual report on Form 20-F of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”).  We hereby consent to the use of the statistical information supplied by us as set forth in the Annual Report.  We further advise the Company that our role has been limited to the provision of such statistical data supplied by us.  With respect to such statistical data, we advise you that:





(1) we have accurately described the information and data of the oil tanker shipping industry, subject to the availability and reliability of the data supporting the statistical and graphical information presented; and





(2) our methodologies for collecting information and data may differ from those of other sources and does not reflect all or even necessarily a comprehensive set of the actual transactions occurring in the oil tanker shipping industry.





We hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report.





Yours faithfully,














Nigel Gardiner


Group Managing Director


Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd.








LONDON | DELHI | SINGAPORE | SHANGHAI


Drewry Shipping Consultants, 15-17 Christopher Street, London EC2A 2BS, United Kingdom


t: +44 (0) 20 7538 0191 f: +44 (0) 20 7987 9396 e: enquiries@drewry.co.uk


Registered in England No. 3289135 Registered VAT No. 830 3017 77


www.drewry.co.uk
No. 00-7114.

#### Sublett *v.*Dormire, Superintendent, Jefferson City Correctional Center, et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 12
 COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP
 Twelve Months
    
    
    Twelve MonthsEnded September 30,
    
    Ended December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Consolidated Income from Continuing
Operations before Income Taxes:
    
    
    575.3
    
    
    
    626.8
    
    
    
    643.7
    
    
    
    727.8
    
    
    
    662.3
    
    
    
    453.7
    
    
    
    455.9Adjustments:Distributed (Undistributed) equity
income
    
    
    0.1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    0.1
    
    
    
    (2.5
    )
    
    
    2.2
    
    
    
    (5.5
    )Fixed charges *
    
    
    111.2
    
    
    
    100.3
    
    
    
    103.2
    
    
    
    91.6
    
    
    
    124.4
    
    
    
    165.9
    
    
    
    190.5Earnings available
    
    
    686.6
    
    
    
    727.1
    
    
    
    746.9
    
    
    
    819.5
    
    
    
    784.2
    
    
    
    621.8
    
    
    
    640.9*Fixed Charges:Interest on long-term and short-term
debt
    
    
    106.3
    
    
    
    94.9
    
    
    
    97.9
    
    
    
    85.8
    
    
    
    117.9
    
    
    
    161.4
    
    
    
    172.0Portion of rentals representing interest
    
    
    4.9
    
    
    
    5.4
    
    
    
    5.3
    
    
    
    5.8
    
    
    
    6.5
    
    
    
    4.5
    
    
    
    18.5Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    111.2
    
    
    
    100.3
    
    
    
    103.2
    
    
    
    91.6
    
    
    
    124.4
    
    
    
    165.9
    
    
    
    190.5Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    6.17
    
    
    
    7.25
    
    
    
    7.24
    
    
    
    8.95
    
    
    
    6.30
    
    
    
    3.75
    
    
    
    3.36
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     UT

<LEGEND>                      The schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from Consolidated
                              Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Statement of
                              Cash Flows for Orange and Rockland Utilities,
                              Inc. and is qualified in its entirety
                              by reference to such financial statements
                              and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000074778
<NAME> Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                               <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                      Sep-30-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                      Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>         693,028

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>       3,447

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>            222,273

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>          127,678

<OTHER-ASSETS>                    43,005

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,089,431

<COMMON>                             0

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>         354,777

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>               (26,092)

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>    328,685

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0

<PREFERRED>                          0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               402,226

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                   0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>            0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>       0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>        0

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>            0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>          0

<LEASES-CURRENT>                     0

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     358,520

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      1,089,431

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          473,159

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>               3,631

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         447,662

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         451,293

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>            21,866

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                 14,077

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>     35,943

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>           24,546

<NET-INCOME>                       11,397

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>        886

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>      10,511

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>           26,167

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>          20,431

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>             56,610

<EPS-BASIC>                        0

<EPS-DILUTED>                        0



</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

QUINCY MURRELL, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D21-2757

LT Case No. 2018-CA-003502-MF 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS

TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE

HOLDERS OF THE HARBORVIEW

MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST

MORTGAGE LOAN PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-12, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 7, 2022

Nonfinal Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Osceola County, 

Margaret H. Schreiber, Judge.

Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B.

Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, and

Anthony N. Legendre, II, of Law Offices

of Legendre & Legendre, PLLC, 

Maitland, for Appellant.

Allison Morat, of Bitman O'Brien &

Morat, PLLC, Lake Mary, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, TRAVER and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Active Health Foods, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory Manos,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








April
      14, 2010
            By:
            /s/ GREGORY
      MANOSGregory
      ManosPresident,
      CEO and Director
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### William T. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. R. ROTHENBACH & SON, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 40384.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 9, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1971.

Leon H. Brush of Crabtree, Butler, Syprett & Meshad, Sarasota, for petitioner.

Kurt Preston Hampp of Ulmer, Wood-worth & Jacobs, St. Petersburg, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari in this cause, and after hearing oral argument and upon consideration of the record we find that the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims is based on competent substantial evidence under our rule as stated in United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 55 So.2d 741 (Fla.1951). It was therefore error for the Industrial Relations Commission to reverse the same. Accordingly, the order of the Full Commission is quashed, with directions to reinstate the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Daqo New Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gongda Yao, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 23, 2013



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Gongda Yao         
|Name:  |  | Gongda Yao             
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
HANSEL FORD LINCOLN-MERCURY 

Page 37.1.402
Page 37.1.403
Page 37.1.404

 
 

Page 37.1.405
 

 

 

 

Page 37.1.406

HAYWARD FORD, INC. 

Page 37.1.408

Page 37.1.410
Page 37.1.411

 

HENRY CURTIS FORD 

Page 37.1.413
Page 37.1.414
 

Page 37.1.415
Page 37.1.416
Page 37.1.417


HERTZ CORPORATION (LOCAL 1101, -15)

Page 37.1.420
Page 37.1.421
 

Page 37.1.422


HERTZ CORPORATION (LOCAL 1414, -21) 

Page 37.1.425

Page 37.1.427

 

Page 37.1.429


 

Page 37.1.432
HERTZ CORPORATION (LOCAL 1546, -02) 

Page 37.1.433
Page 37.1.434
 

 

Page 37.1.435
 

Page 37.1.436

 

 

HONDA EL CERRITO 

Page 37.1.438

Page 37.1.440
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1569 V

UNPUBLISHED

RENEE ORLANDI

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: March 2, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for petitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On October 9, 2019

, Renee Orlandi filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury r elated to vaccine

administration ( “ S IRVA ” ) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine administered on

November 3, 2016 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit

of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 28, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent concl udes that Pet itioner “ suffered a right SIRVA injury as

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

defined by the Vaccine Injury Table

. ” Id. at 7

- 8 . Respondent further agrees that Petitioner

suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months

. Id. at 8.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Asia Growth Private Equity 3, Limited. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1)
The Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 20, 2010





/s/ James HahnJames HahnChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Asia Growth Private Equity 3, Limited., and will be retained by Asia Growth Private Equity 3, Limited. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region III Advisory Council; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, Region III Advisory 
Council, located in the geographical area of Clarksburg, West Virginia, 
will hold a public meeting at 10:30 am-3:30 pm, on Thursday, December 
4, 1997, at U.S. Small Business Administration, Charleston Branch 
Office, 4th Floor Conference Room, 405 Capitol Street, Charleston, WV, 
25301 to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of 
the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call Ms. Jayne Armstrong, State 
Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 168 West Main Street, 
Clarksburg, WV, 26301, (304) 623-5631.
Gene Carlson,
Associate Administrator, Office of Communications & Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 97-31497 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2121 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

of the exclusion for dependent care assistance programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mrs. AXNE (for herself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mrs. HINSON, Ms. JACOBS of California, Ms. WILD, Mr. SIRES, Mr. TONKO, Mr. HARDER of California, 

Mr. COHEN, Mr. CARBAJAL, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation of the exclusion for dependent care assistance programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Child Care 

5 for Working Families Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION OF EXCLUSION FOR DE7 PENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 129(a)(2)(A) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2121 IH

1 ($2,500’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,500 (half such dollar 

2 amount’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred in cal5 endar years beginning after the date of the enactment of 

6 this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS