alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Item 77D DWS Equity Income Fund (a series of
DWS Value Equity Trust)


At a meeting held May 21-22, 2008, the Board of
Directors of DWS Equity Income Fund, a series of
DWS Value Equity Trust, approved the Fund's
participation in a securities lending program (the
"Program") effective on or about June 6, 2008.
Pursuant to the program, the Fund may lend its
investment securities in an amount up to 33 1/3% of
its total assets to approved institutional borrowers
who need to borrow securities in order to complete
certain transactions.


Z:\Electronic Working Files\NSAR\2008\03-31-08\DWS Value
Builder Fund (annual)\03-Exhibits\Exhibit 77D DWS Value
Builder.doc
Exhibit 32.3.2



Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Robert N. Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (the Company) certify that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, which this statement accompanies, (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    ROBERT N. HOGLUNDRobert N. Hoglund


Dated: August 3, 2004
OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

December 2, 2015

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Recommendation for a General Waiver for the Aquatic Field Dissipation 

Study Requirement for Proposed Watercress Uses

FROM: Donald J. Brady, Ph.D., Director

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

Office of Pesticide Programs

TO: Susan Lewis, Director

Registration Division (7505P)

Office of Pesticide Programs

Rick P. Keigwin, Jr., Director

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P)

Office of Pesticide Programs

This memorandum recommends a general waiver for the aquatic field dissipation study 

requirement for proposed and registered uses on watercress. The Code of Federal Regulations 

(40 CFR Part 158.1300) indicates that an aquatic field dissipation study (Guideline 835.6200) is 

required to support aquatic use patterns including use on watercress. However, the cost of the 

study is disproportionate to the extent of watercress grown in the United States (the Census of 

Agriculture indicates that 733 acres were harvested nationwide in 2012 (USDA, 2014)). 

Therefore, this study requirement should be waived except for a proposed use on watercress for a 

pesticide that is not proposed or currently registered for any other outdoor agricultural uses. In 

practice, this general waiver recommendation removes the requirement for FIFRA Section 3 

applicants to submit an aquatic field dissipation study or to request a waiver for this study to 

support a proposed use on watercress, unless watercress is the only proposed use for the 

pesticide.

This general waiver recommendation for watercress uses should apply to all FIFRA Section 3 

applications and to Registration Review actions. However, in the absence of this study, if risks 

of concern are identified that cannot be mitigated, EPA may require an aquatic field dissipation 

study to address special concerns. This general waiver recommendation may be rescinded if the 

extent of watercress grown in the United States increases substantially.

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2014. 2012 Census of Agriculture. National 

Agricultural Statistics Service. United States Summary and State Data, Volume 1. AC12-A-51. Issued May 2014. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/
U.S. Department of the Treasury

State Small Business Credit Initiative (SSBCI) Program

SSBCI Technical Assistance Grant Program Application Deadline Extended for Tribal 

Governments

July 14, 2023

The U.S. Department of the Treasury is extending the deadline for Tribal governments to submit 

their complete SSBCI Technical Assistance (TA) Grant Program application to 

October 27, 2023, at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time (ET). 

Tribal governments that submitted a timely and complete SSBCI Capital Program application or 

were part of a timely and complete Tribal joint Capital Program application are eligible to submit 

or be part of a Tribal joint application for the TA Grant Program. A list of Capital Program 

applications Treasury has received corresponding to Tribal governments can be found on 

Treasury’s website.

Treasury seeks to support all Tribal governments that are interested in participating in SSBCI. 

Treasury will provide information and technical assistance on TA Grant Program applications to 

Tribal governments that submit questions to SSBCI_Information@treasury.gov.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Sameer Dholakia, Chief Executive Officer of SendGrid Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:

|  | 1. |  | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--|----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: February 26, 2018

 

|                                                                                                        |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/ SAMEER DHOLAKIA

 

Sameer Dholakia Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |   |

 

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 233 (Thursday, December 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31760]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-851-001]


H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

November 28, 1997.
    H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc. (H.Q. Energy) filed an application 
for authorization to sell power at market-based rates, and for certain 
waivers and authorizations. In particular, H.Q. Energy requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by H.Q. 
Energy. On November 12, 1997, the Commission issued an Order Accepting 
For Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above-docketed 
proceeding.
    The Commission's November 12, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (G), (H), and (J):
    (G) Within 30 days after the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
H.Q. Energy should file a motion to intervene or protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214.
    (H) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (G) above, H.Q. Energy is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of H.Q. Energy, compatible with 
the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (J) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of H.Q. 
Energy's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is December 12, 1997.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31760 Filed 12-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
SELF-EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATION

SELF-EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATION

TENANT/APPLICANT: DATE: 

PROPERTY NAME: 

Business Name 

Business Address 

Date Business Opened 

Have operations been continuous? Yes No 

Type of Business 

I, _______________________________________, do hereby certify that I am self-employed and that for the most current 

tax year________, my net earnings were $_____________________. I hereby attach a copy of my individual federal 

income tax return for the prior calendar year. I anticipate my annual earnings for the next calendar year to be 

$__________________. I certify that the information shown in such accompanying income tax return is true and 

complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that providing false or misleading information is a breach of my lease 

and may be subject to criminal penalties. 

Check all that apply: 

 Previous year’s tax return Explanation of how anticipated income was calculated if less than tax return 

 Other Supporting Documentation of Income 

Comments: 

I hereby certify that the information provided is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. 

_________________________________________________ _____________________ 

SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/TENANT DATE
#### Harry F. DiFRANCESCO, Appellant, v. MOTORS INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 2667.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 9, 1970.

Myron M. Stevens, Merritt Island, for appellant.

Russell Troutman of Fishback, Davis, Dominick, Troutman & Salfi, Orlando, for appellee.

*538PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Kest v. Nathanson, Fla.App.1968, 216 So. 2d 233; Link-Belt Co. v. Hariner, D.C.S.D. Fla.1926, 12 F.2d 453; Moresca v. Allstate, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 231 So.2d 283, opinion filed February 6, 1970.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Treasury approves North Dakota’s plan to invest $43.5 million of CPF 

funding in broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-speed 

internet to locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

North Dakota

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $43.5 million for Broadband Infrastructure (40% of CPF allocation)

 Locations to Be Served: 3,965 (initial estimate)

 Program Description: Broadband North Dakota, a 

competitive grant program, is designed to address 

the needs of North Dakotans who currently lack 

access to reliable, affordable high-speed internet. 

The program aims to provide sustainable, future-proof

connectivity to areas in the state lacking connectivity of

at least 100/20 Mbps, including tribal lands.

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: North Dakota Information Technology Department

On May 15, 2023, Treasury approved North Dakota’s request to modify the funding

from $45M to $43.5M. This fact sheet reflects these changes.

North Dakota Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by North Dakota, 

estimates show that investments 

made using the Capital Projects 

Fund will serve 40% of locations 

still lacking high-speed internet 

access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
#### *Cox v.*Cox.

*Divorce—Journal entry of decree controls—Oral decision not determinative.*

(No. 17842

Decided October 23, 1923.)

Error to Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Hicks & Hicks*and *Mr. J. Q. Martm,*for plaintiff in error.

No appearance of counsel of record for defendant in error.

By the Court.

The plaintiff in error, Fred G. Cox, instituted his action in the court of common pleas of Hamilton county against Murtice Cox, the defendant in error, for a divorce. On January 27, 1920, the court of common pleas, as shown by its journal entry of that date, found that the allegations of the petition were not supported by the evidence and that the plaintiff was not entitled to a divorce as therein prayed, and thereupon dismissed the plaintiff’s petition at his costs.

On the following day, to-wit, January 28, 1920, the plaintiff in that action filed his motion asking the court to set aside the judgment dismissing the petition, on the ground that the divorce proceeding had come on for hearing on November 6, 1919, at the conclusion of which the court had announced its decision, granting the plaintiff a divorce, and that relying thereon plaintiff had again married; that the court lost jurisdiction of the subject of the action and of the parties and had no power or author*474ity to enter said judgment of dismissal January 27, 1920.

The court of common pleas found that said motion was not well taken and overruled the same, whereupon error was prosecuted to the Court of Appeals to reverse the action of the lower court in refusing to set aside its former order. Thereafter the Court of Appeals heard the cause and found that there was no error apparent upon the record in the proceeding in the court of common pleas, wherein the motion to set aside the judgment entered by that court January 27,1920, had been overruled, whereupon error was prosecuted to this court.

In this case there was no entry of a judgment prior to that of January 27, 1920, and apparently no application was made for a *mmc pro time*entry of any judgment or decree claimed to have been announced by the trial court prior thereto. It has been definitely decided by this court that a court speaks through its journal and that a judgment is not rendered until it is reduced to a journal entry. *Industrial Commission*v. *Musselli,*102 Ohio St., 10, 130 N. E., 32.

Hence we find no error in the action of the Court of Appeals in affirming the order of the trial court, wherein that court overruled the motion to vacate the judgment of dismissal of the divorce proceeding, on the ground that it was a valid subsisting judgment. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Bobinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated
Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2007 and for
the period then ended.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Thomas F. Farrell, II            
| |  | Thomas F. Farrell, II                
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 2, 2007                          



| |  |                                                     
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Thomas N. Chewning                              
| |  | Thomas N. Chewning                                  
| |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 2, 2007
**MA INTENANCE LOG**  **DESCRIPTION VERSION**  **November 5, 2013** Install 5.8Ghz Receiver Firmware 1.0.1.3 **April 15, 2014** Installation of DJI Phantom 2 Vision Prop Guards — **June 6, 2014** Replacement (4) DJI Phantom 2 Vision Self Tightening Propellors — **July 17, 2014** Replacement (4) DJI Phantom 2 Vision Self Tightening Propellors — **October 28, 2014** Update Gimbal Firmware 1.0.0.6 **November 4, 2014** Update 5.8GHz Remote Controller 1.0.2.30 **November 28, 2014** Update Phantom 2 Vision+ Central Board Firmware 1.0.2.10 **January 16, 2015** Update DJI Camera 1.3.0 **January 30, 2015** Update Mac Assistant Firmware 3.8 **February 6, 2015** Update iOS App 1.0.48 **February 24, 2015** Replacement (4) DJI Phantom 2 Vision Self Tightening Propellors — **March 3, 2015** Update Phantom 2 Vision+ Autopilot System 3.12

### Table 1

1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Michael J. Shea, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: December 30, 2003 |  | /s/ MICHAEL J. SHEA
Michael J. Shea
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
V|àç tÇw VÉâÇàç Éy WxÇäxÜ

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR

CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING

DENVER, CO  80202‐5390

TELEPHONE:  (720) 865‐9090 • FAX: (720) 865‐8787

TTY/ TTD: (720) 865‐9010

May 24, 2012

Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C.  20590

RE: DOT‐OST‐2012‐0083

Dear Secretary LaHood:

Please accept this letter of support for the application of Volaris to operate scheduled passenger service

between Denver International Airport (“DEN”) and Mexico City’s Benito Juárez International Airport.   

The City of Denver believes the expanded passenger service will be economically beneficial to growing

the local and our national economy. Mexico is one of the top export nations for Colorado's goods and

services, and the improved passenger service will provide opportunities to expand these trade and

economic relationships and increase visits to Colorado and the mountain west for business and

recreation.

DEN has lacked year‐round nonstop service to Mexico City since the bankruptcy of Mexicana in August

2010.  The introduction of new service by Volaris will stimulate market demand, further growing

passenger traffic that will benefit all carriers.  In addition, new international air service is a key driver of

new jobs and economic activity in the Denver metro area and across the State of Colorado.

Denver and Colorado are home to one of the largest Mexican‐American populations in the United

States, and Mexico City ranks as one of DEN’s largest international markets.  The strong community of

interest, in addition to the growing business, tourism and cultural links between Colorado and Mexico,

will greatly benefit from this new service.   

Thank you for your consideration.  We urge you to approve this application.

Respectfully,

Michael B. Hancock

Mayor

`|v{txÄ UA [tÇvÉv~

Mayor
### Updated version of the NO 2 final notice Lydia Wegman to: Heidi King 01/15/2010 02:55 PM Cc: Scott Jenkins, Karen Martin, Nealson Watkins, Lewis Weinstock, John Hannon, David Orlin, Charlotte Bertrand, Tricia Crabtree Heidi, Attached is the revised version of the final NO2 notice. The revisions are primarily clarifying edits, largely in the levels and monitoring sections. Edits are indicated in track changes (compared to the version that was sent to OMB). Some of the changes are referred to in the memo I sent you earlier today responding to interagency comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Lydia