alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00285-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.L., J.L., and J.L., Children

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-00467

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 26, 2015

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

After the trial court sustained a contest to Appellant’s affidavit of indigence, on July 29, 

2015, we notified Appellant that the trial court clerk filed a notification of late clerk’s record stating 

that the clerk’s record has not been filed because (1) Appellant has failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, and (2) Appellant is not entitled to 

appeal without paying the fee. We ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court on or 

before August 10, 2015, that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the clerk’s fee. We warned Appellant that if he failed to respond within the time 

provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 
04-15-00285-CV

- 2 -

To date, Appellant has not filed any response with this court. Therefore, we dismiss this 

appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(c). Costs of this appeal are taxed against 

Appellant. See id. R. 43.4.

PER CURIAM
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan totaling $450,000 to Aero 

Hydraulics Inc. (the Company), a repair station with approximately 2 U.S. employees in March 

2020.

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(1) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is unsecured. It has an annual interest rate equal to 

LIBOR plus 5.5% and matures on October 24, 2025. Treasury funded the full loan amount at 

close. The loan proceeds will be used to provide liquidity to continue the Company’s operations.

The transaction agreement includes covenants by the Company to comply with certain 

restrictions on employee compensation, stock repurchases, dividends, and reductions in 

employment levels, as required by the CARES Act. The loan constitutes senior indebtedness of 

the Company, and Treasury will receive 3% payment-in-kind annual interest on the loan in 

accordance with section 4003(d) of the CARES Act.
#### Thomas Joseph LAVALLEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-848.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 25, 1977.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, and James K. Green, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Martha G. Madorsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*1049PER CURIAM.

Based upon this Court’s decision in *Prince*v. *State,*333 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1976), (which was not available to the trial court at the time the proceedings below transpired) the judgment of conviction and sentence of obtaining property by worthless check is reversed, with directions to grant defendant a new trial for failure of the trial court to charge the jury that intent to defraud is an indispensable element of the alleged crime.

REVERSED.

MAGER, C. J., and DOWNEY and AN-STEAD, JJ., concur.

Certiorari denied, Fla., 352 So.2d 175.
Order entered October 26, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00801
- CV JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant

V. JUDGE PAUL MCNULTY, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 219
- 01611
- 2015



### O RDER
We DENY appellant’s motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal to the extent it concerns the unappealable order sustaining contest to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 145 affidavit of indigence. We further DENY the motion as moot to the extent it concerns the vexatious litigant order as the notice of appeal of that order was timely filed

.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
#### TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. David A. MANEY, Administrator of the Estate of Clarence Sturgill, Respondent.

No. 73-1028.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 8, 1974.

William T. Keen, Tampa, for petitioners.

David A. Maney, Gordon & Maney, Tampa, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied under the rationale of Brown, Inc. v. Seminerio, Fla.App. 4th, 1971, 246 So.2d 629.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the "Company") for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Michael J. Shea, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: |  | December 30, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael J. SheaMichael J. Shea
Chief Financial Officer
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1202

GARRIS S. MCFADDEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION, AFLCIO; HORACE T. ALSTON, Vice President,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(1:04-cv-02317-WDQ)

Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: July 31, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Garris S. McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. John P. Sheridan, GLEASON &

MATHEWS, New York, New York, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Garris S. McFadden appeals the district court’s adverse

grant of summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. McFadden v. Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFLCIO, No. 1:04-cv-02317-WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00080

- CR

Ex parte Fabbian Donte Scott

FROM THE CRIM INAL DIST RICT C OU RT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY NO. 21

- 36749 , JOHN B. STEVENS JR. , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Fabbia n Donte Scott , acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal from a January 31,
20 22 order den ying his application for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus issued by the criminal district court of Jefferson County , Texas

. 1 However, our appellate jurisdi ction in cri m inal cases
does not extend to Jeffers on County , which is outside the boundaries of our district

. Compare
T ex. Gov ’ t Code § 22. 201(d) (listing twenty

- four counties in Third Court of Appeals ’ district) , with id. § 22.201 ( j ) (listing counties in Ninth Court of Appeals District, including
Jefferson County)

. Be cause Jefferson County is outside the boundaries of our d istrict , we lack appellate jurisdiction i n t h i s m a t t e r , and w e dismiss th is appeal fo r want of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

_____ _

____________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

1 W e re ference only the information that Scott provided in his notice of appeal and in his prematur ely filed brief b ecause we do not have a clerk’s record

.2 Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Juri s diction
Filed: March 22, 2022
Do Not Publish
#### Samuel Davis DOTTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Treasury approves Idaho’s plan to invest $120 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Idaho

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $120 million for Broadband Infrastructure (93% of CPF allocation)

 Locations to Be Served: 35,000 (estimated)

 Program Description: The Idaho Broadband Advisory

Board (IBAB) Broadband Infrastructure Grant – CPF (BIG-CPF)

is a competitive grant program designed to build reliable

broadband infrastructure to areas lacking access to internet

with speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps. Building off previous

CARES Act investments in broadband, Idaho will prioritize

fiber investments aiming to connect the greatest number of

households to high-speed internet.

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps upon 

project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: The Idaho Department of Commerce (IDOC)

Idaho’s Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Idaho, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~23% of locations still 

lacking high-speed internet 

access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
Presidential Documents

63247

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 229

Friday, November 28, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Executive Order 13068 of November 25, 1997

Closing of Government Departments and Agencies on Friday,

December 26, 1997

By the authority vested in me as President of the United States of America,

it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. All executive departments and agencies shall be closed and their

employees excused from duty on Friday, December 26, 1997, the day following Christmas Day, except as provided in section 2 below.

Sec. 2. The heads of executive departments and agencies may determine

that certain offices and installations of their organizations, or parts thereof,

must remain open and that certain employees must report for duty on

December 26, 1997, for reasons of national security or defense or for other

public reasons.

Sec. 3. Friday, December 26, 1997, shall be considered as falling within

the scope of Executive Order 11582 and of 5 U.S.C. 5546 and 6103(b)

and other similar statutes insofar as they relate to the pay and leave of

[FR Doc. 97–31456

employees of the United States.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

November 25, 1997.

œ–

Filed 11–25–97; 2:50 pm]

Billing code 3195–01–P
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer  of Citizens, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350





I, Geoffrey M. Kolander, certify that:





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Citizens, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey M. Kolander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Geoffrey M. KolanderName:Geoffrey M. KolanderTitle:President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:November 13, 2017




















6
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Lodging Trust (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas W. Vicari, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: February 16, 2011



/s/ Douglas W. VicariExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Treasury approves Kansas’s plan to invest $83.5 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Kansas

 For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

▪ Program Summary: $83.5 million for Broadband Infrastructure (58% of CPF allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 21,300 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: Kansas’s LINC (Lasting Infrastructure

and Network Connectivity) program, a competitive grant 

program, will build high-speed internet service in areas

where there is a demonstrated need. LINC will contribute 

to bridging the digital divide by providing access to reliable 

high-speed internet connections. Capital Projects Fund 

dollars will help build reliable infrastructure that is 

affordable in the areas the program is designed to serve.

‒ LINC is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps symmetrical to 

households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the Kansas Office of Broadband 

Development’s use of CPF will participate in the FCC’s Affordable Connectivity Program 

(ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

▪ Key State Contact: Kansas Office of Broadband Development

Kansas Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Kansas, 

estimates show that 

investments made using 

the Capital Projects Fund 

will serve 8% of 

locations still lacking 

high-speed internet 

access in the state.
#### In the Matter of Thomas Ellington, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[736 NYS2d 639]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a deter*920mination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing weapons. As set forth in the misbehavior report, the reporting correction officer was assisting in a routine search of petitioner’s dormitory when he observed petitioner running from his cube toward the end of the building, holding an object in his hand which he proceeded to place under a radiator. When the officer looked under the radiator, he found an eight-inch-long metal shank.

At the ensuing disciplinary hearing, evidence was presented in the form of, inter alia, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the reporting correction officer. This proof was sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, *Matter of Thomas v Bennett,*271 AD2d 768; *Matter of Joyce v Coughlin,*219 AD2d 777, 778). Petitioner’s assertion of Hearing Officer bias is unsupported by the record which shows that he received a fair and impartial hearing *(see, Matter of McCorkle v Selsky,*264 AD2d 890, 891). Petitioner’s testimony, in which he asserted his innocence of the charged misconduct, as well as the exculpatory testimony of his inmate witness, presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer *(see, Matter of Baldwin v Goord,*262 AD2d 691, 692). The remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been reviewed and found to lack merit.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 203 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 203

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, as the ``Benny C. Martinez 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2021

 Ms. Garcia of Texas (for herself, Mr. Castro of Texas, Mr. Babin, Mr. 
 Vela, Ms. Johnson of Texas, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Roy, Mr. Veasey, Mr. 
 Taylor, Mr. Williams of Texas, and Mr. Green of Texas) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, as the ``Benny C. Martinez 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENNY C. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Benny C. Martinez Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Benny C. 
Martinez Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6079
MACK WAYNE PETERSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-741-5-HC-BO) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mack Wayne Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peterson v. North Carolina Dep't Corr. , No. CA-94-741-5-HCBO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument and deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   February 22, 2013 |   | By: /s/ Craig S. McMillan    |
|------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Craig S. McMillan            |
|                                     |   | Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                     |   | Principal Executive Officer  |
|                                     |   | Director                     |
|                                     |   |                         |
|                                     |   |                         |
|                                     |   |                         |
| Date:   February 22, 2013 |   | By: /s/ Steve W. Roussin     |
|                                     |   | Steve W. Roussin             |
|                                     |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
|                                     |   | Principal Financial Officer  |
|                                     |   | Principal Accounting Officer |
|                                     |   | President                    |
|                                     |   | Director                     |

----
UNITED FURNITURE WORKERS <Pension Pund }l 

P.O. BOX 100037 TEL: 615-889-8860 

HARRY BOOT Ch"'1N11 NASHVILLE, TN 37224 FAX: 615-391-0865 

DEE ANNE WALKER 0........ 

U.S. Secretary of the Treasury 

U.S. Department of the Treasury 

1500 Pennsylvania A venue, NW 

Washington, DC 20220 

February 21, 201 7 

1910 AIR LANE DRIVE 

NASHVILLE, TN 37210 

Re: Withdrawal of August 11 , 2016 Application for Suspension 

of Benefits of the United Furniture Workers Pension Fund A 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Ttulloas 

DANA CARSTENSEN 

ELMO DE SILVA 

DAVID MELAGRANO 

DIANA STRICKLAND 

ULISES VERGARA 

WEBSITE -

www ufwip.com 

As an authorized trustee of the Board of Trustees of the United Furniture Workers Pension Fund 

A (the "Pension Fund"), the plan sponsor of the Pension Fund, I respectfully withdraw the 

Pension Fund's application filed on August 11, 2016 for suspension of benefits pursuant to 

Section 432(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the •·code"') and the 

parallel provisions of Section 305(e)(9) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 

1974, as amended ("ERISA"). The Pension Fund fully intends to file with the Treasury 

Department a new application for a suspension of benefits pursuant to the applicable provisions 

of the Code and ERISA on or before March 15, 2017. 

Harry Boot, Chairman 

Authorized Trustee 

Respectfully submitted, 

United Furniture Workers Pension Fund A