This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

64801

Vol. 62, No. 236

Tuesday, December 9, 1997

ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW

BOARD

Formal Determinations, Additional

Releases, and Corrections: Correction

AGENCY: Assassination Records Review

Board.

ACTION: Correction.

SUMMARY: In notice document 97–31904

beginning on page 64,195 in the

December 4, 1997, make the following

correction: On page 64,200 in the

second column and on page 64,201 in

the third column the documents listed

below were published as Additional

Releases in Full but should have been

published as Open in Full by Review

Board vote in that notice. The

assassination records are identified by

the record identification number

assigned in the President John F.

Kennedy Assassination Records

Collection database maintained by the

National Archives.

FBI Documents: Opened in Full:

124–10201–10406; 0; n/a

124–10214–10038; 0; n/a

Dated: December 4, 1997.

Thomas E. Samoluk,

Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. 97–32204 Filed 12–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6118–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economic Development

Administration

Notice of Petitions by Producing Firms

for Determination of Eligiblity To Apply

for Trade Adjustment Assistance

AGENCY: Economic Development

Administration (EDA).

ACTION: To give firms an opportunity to

comment.

Petitions have been accepted for filing

on the dates indicated from the firms

listed below.

LIST OF PETITION ACTION BY TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR PERIOD 10/18/97–11/17/97

Firm name Address

Date petition accepted

Product

Arkay Packaging Corporation ... 22 Arkay Drive, Hauppauge,

NY 11787.

10/23/97 Folding Cartons, Boxes and Cases of Non-Corrugated Paper

and Paper Board.

Britt Kennedy Signs, Inc ........... 100 East Chestnut, Amite, LA

70422.

10/30/97 Sign, Name, Address and Similar Plates.

Cedarbrook Manufacturing Corporation.240 Roberts Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19144.10/30/97 Metal Household and Doll Furniture.

MacConnell Research Corporation.11339 B Sorrento Valley Road,

San Diego, CA 92121.

11/04/97 Precision Instruments Used in the Analysis of Blood and

Other Liquids.

Autopoint, Inc ............................ 1310 Pinefield Avenue, Janesville, WI 53545.11/07/97 Ball Point Pens.

Ajusta Manufacturing, Inc ......... 821 North River Road, West

Bend, WI 53095.

11/07/97 Components of Hydraulic Mechanisms for Jacks, Hospital

Beds and Automotive Convertible Tops.

Barnhart Industries, Inc ............. P.O. Box 278, Barnhart, MO

63012.

11/07/97 Soft Sewing Notions, Garters, Orthodontic Headgear.

Comstock Creations, Inc ........... 190 Sawyer Drive, Durango,

CO 81301.

11/07/97 Statuettes and Other Ornaments of Base Metal (Pewter).

RBA Manufacturing Co ............. 217 South Marion Street,

Malden, MO 63863.

11/10/97 Women’s Lingerie, Children’s Clothing and Novelty Items for

the Christmas Industry.

Bula, Inc .................................... 72 Suttle Street, Durango, CO

81301.

11/12/97 Hats and Other Headgear of Knit Fabric and Wind Jackets.

Faulhaber Company (The) ........ 21–31 Hamilton Street,

Monroeville, OH 44847.

11/12/97 Saddles for Bicycles and Lawn Tractors, and Bicycle Parts.

Pryor Novelty Company, Inc ..... Highway 52, Tuscumbia, MO

65082.

11/13/97 Cedar Wood Novelty Gift Boxes and Chests.

Kaysam Worldwide, Inc ............ 55 Shepherds Lane, Totowa,

NJ 07512.

11/17/97 Ceiling, Pilot and Sounding Meteorological Balloons.

The petitions were submitted

pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade Act

of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2341). Consequently,

the United States Department of

Commerce has initiated separate

investigations to determine whether

increased imports into the United States

of articles like or directly competitive

with those produced by each firm

contributed importantly to total or

partial separation of the firm’s workers,

or threat thereof, and to a decrease in

sales or production of each petitioning

firm.

Any party having a substantial

interest in the proceedings may request

a public hearing on the matter. A

request for a hearing must be received

by Trade Adjustment Assistance, Room

7315, Economic Development

Administration, U.S. Department of
64802 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 1997 / Notices

Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230, no

later than the close of business of the

tenth calendar day following the

publication of this notice.

(The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

official program number and title of the

program under which these petitions are

submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment

Assistance)

Dated: November 24, 1997.

Anthony J. Meyer,

Coordinator, Trade Adjustment and

Technical Assistance.

[FR Doc. 97–32156 Filed 12–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–24–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–301–602]

Certain Fresh Cut Flowers From

Colombia; Amended Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of amended final results

of antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On October 14, 1997, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the final results

and partial rescission of the ninth

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on certain fresh

cut flowers from Colombia (62 FR

53287). Based on the correction of

ministerial errors made in those final

results with respect to two

manufacturer/exporters, and the

subsequent changes in duty absorption

amounts and the rate for non-selected

respondents, we are publishing this

amendment to the final results in

accordance with 19 CFR 353.28(c).

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 9, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cynthia Thirumalai or Zak Smith, Office

1, Group 1, AD/CVD Enforcement,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone

(202) 482–4087 and (202) 482–1279,

respectively.

APPLICABLE STATUTE AND REGULATIONS:

Unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the statute are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (URAA). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department’s regulations are to

those codified at 19 CFR Part 353 (April

1997).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On October 14, 1997, we published a

notice of Final Results and Partial

Rescission of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review (Final Results).

We received timely allegations of

ministerial errors made in the final

results by Hosa Ltda (Hosa) and Maxima

Farms Group (Maxima) on October 22 &

23, 1997, respectively.

Scope of Review

Imports covered by these reviews are

shipments of certain fresh cut flowers

from Colombia (standard carnations,

miniature (spray) carnations, standard

chrysanthemums and pompon

chrysanthemums). These products are

currently classifiable under item

numbers 0603.10.30.00, 0603.10.70.10,

0603.10.70.20, and 0603.10.70.30 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). The

HTS item numbers are provided for

convenience and Customs purposes.

The written description of the scope of

this order remains dispositive.

Alleged Ministerial Errors

Hosa

Issue 1: Calculation of CEP Profit

In our final results, HOSA claims that

the Department erred by failing to

include indirect selling expenses

incurred in Colombia in calculating

constructed export price (CEP) profit.

DOC Position: We agree with HOSA

that we failed to include indirect selling

expenses incurred in Colombia in

calculating CEP profit. We intended to

include indirect selling expenses and

have made this correction for the

amended final results. We note that this

omission was unique to HOSA.

Issue 2: Returned Flowers

HOSA alleges that the Department

erred in its calculation of costs

associated with returned flowers. HOSA

claims that the Department should have

used cost of production (COP) rather

than constructed value (CV), because CV

includes an amount for profit.

DOC Position: The question of

whether to use CV or COP is a

methodological issue. Our use of CV in

this calculation was intentional.

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR

353.28(d), we do not consider this to be

a ministerial error (see, 19 CFR

353.28(d) (1996)).

Issue 3: Calculation of Indirect Selling

Expenses

While reviewing the above

allegations, we discovered an additional

ministerial error. When generating the

multiplier used in the calculation of

indirect selling expenses for CV we did

not use the correct number of

minicarnations sold in all markets. We

have corrected this error.

Maxima

Issue 1: Calculation of Number of Stems

of Export-Quality Standard Carnations

Sold

Maxima alleges that we failed to

increase the number of export-quality

stems of standard carnations sold to

reflect information obtained at

verification regarding home market

sales.

DOC Position: We agree with Maxima

that the number of stems of exportquality standard carnations sold should

be increased by the number of stems

sold in the home market. We intended

to increase the number pursuant to

information gathered at verification and

have corrected this error in these

amended final results.

Issue 2: Input of Monthly Number of

Stems of Minicarnations Transshipped

to Third Country

Maxima claims that the final digits of

the monthly volumes of minicarnations

transshipped through the United States

were omitted.

DOC Position: We agree with Maxima

and have made this correction in these

amended final results.

Duty Absorption

As a result of correcting these

ministerial errors, the amount of U.S.

sales through affiliated importers has

also changed:

Name of company

Percentage

of U.S. affiliated importer sales

with margins

Hosa .......................................... 15.83

Maxima ..................................... 31.61

Amended Final Results of Review

As a result of these amended final

results, we determine the following

percentage weighted-average margins to

exist for Hosa and Maxima (both

selected respondents) for the period of

review (March 1, 1995 through February

29, 1996):

Percent

Hosa Group .............................. 2.01