alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed May 1, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1656

Lower Tribunal No. 18-37356

________________

Yaniv Nakash, etc., et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Covenant Palms ULGM, LLC,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William 

Thomas, Judge.

Assouline & Berlowe, P.A., and Kevin D. Klagge, for appellants.

Marva L. Wiley, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Appellants, the defendants below, Yaniv Nakash1 and Michael 

Herskowitz appeal the trial court’s July 21, 2023 final judgment awarding 

appellee, the plaintiff below, Covenant Palms ULGM, LLC (“Covenant 

Palms”) a joint and several $1 million judgment against appellants. The 

principal issue disputed at trial was whether the parties had entered into an 

enforceable, binding contract for the purchase and sale of real property 

located in Miami, Florida. 

After conducting a bench trial, the trial court entered detailed findings 

of fact, finding, inter alia, that the parties had entered into an enforceable, 

written purchase agreement, and that the buyer, Nakash, had breached the 

contract. The trial court further found that Herskowitz, who served as the 

escrow agent for the transaction, had breached his fiduciary duty owed to 

Covenant Palms by releasing the $1 million escrow deposit to Nakash. 

Each of the trial court’s factual findings are supported by competent, 

substantial evidence, and our de novo review of the trial court’s legal 

determinations regarding the contract reveal no error. See Evans v. Diaz, 

365 So. 3d 1176, 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023) (“[I]ssues of contract 

interpretation and formation are reviewed de novo, while factual findings are 

1 As trustee of the Nakash Family Land Trust.
3

reviewed for competent, substantial evidence.”). Accordingly, we affirm the 

July 21, 2023 final judgment.

Affirmed.
Treasury approves Texas’ plan to invest $438.8 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Texas

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $438.8 million for Broadband Infrastructure (88% of CPF allocation)

 Locations to Be Served: 152,000 (estimated)

 Program Description: The Bringing Online Opportunities to

Texans (BOOT) Program is a competitive grant program

designed to fund last mile broadband infrastructure projects

in areas throughout the state. The BOOT Program will prioritize

projects that serve historically socio-economically

disadvantaged areas and offer affordable service options and

digital literacy support. 

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: The Texas Broadband Development Office (BDO)

Texas Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Texas, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~5% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

On 1/25/2024, Treasury approved Texas’ request to increase funding from $363.8M to $438.8M for the BOOT program.

This fact sheet reflects these changes.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. HP Jin, the chief executive officer of TeleNav, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By:

/s/     Dr. HP
JINDr. HP JinChairman of Board of Directors, President andChief Executive OfficerDate: September 9, 2011
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 10 02

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ LaRo nd a Ph ox ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. NCO Fin an ci al Sy st em s, In c. ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 18 , 20 15 Fil ed : M ay

21 , 20 15 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, LOKEN , andBENTON, Circu itJu dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

LaRo nd a Ph ox ap pe al s th e di st ric t co urt’s ad ve rs e gr an t of su m m ary jud gm en t 1 in he r pr o se act io n un de r th e Fai r Cred it Rep or ti ng Act an d th e Fai r Deb t Co ll ect io n

The Hon or ab le Greg Kay s, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e 1 W es te rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i.Prac ti ces Act. Upo n a care fu l, de no vo rev ie w of th e reco rd an d co ns id erat io n of th e

pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , we co nc l u d e th at su m m ary jud gm en t was pr op erl y gr an te d. See Men ard , In c. v. Dial -Co lu m bu s, LLC, 78 1 F.3 d 99 3, 99 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 15 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w). Fu rth er, we de cl in e to co ns id er th e ne w is su es Ph ox rai se d fo r th e fir st ti m e in he r ap pe ll at e rep ly br ie f. See Whi te v. Sm it h, 69 6 F.3 d 74 0, 74 9 n.8 (8 th Cir . 20 12 ).
The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### Jeanne FREEMAN, Appellant, v. Gary D. FREEMAN, Appellee.

No. 70-139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 21, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1970.

Joseph Nesbitt, Miami, for appellant.

Stuart A. Markus, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

*409PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the former wife of appellee from an order of the circuit court terminating alimony payments as provided for in the final decree of divorce and substituting therefor a lump sum award.

It is appellant’s contention that the court committed reversible error in ordering modification of the final judgment.

Upon consideration of the record and the applicable law, we have concluded that there was sufficient evidence of changed circumstances to support the order appealed, and it has not been made to appear that the court abuséd its broad discretionary power to amend or alter awards for alimony. § 61.14 Fla.Stat.F.S.A.; Nixon v. Nixon, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 263.

Affirmed.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 1, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23

- 1656 Lower Tribunal No. 1 8

- 37356

________________ 

### Yaniv Nakash, etc., et al. ,

Appellant s ,

vs. 

### Covenant Palms ULGM, LLC ,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, William Thomas , Judge. Assouline & Berlowe, P.A., and Kevin D. Klagge , for appellant s

. Marva L. Wiley , for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOB R EE , JJ.
PER CURIAM.2

Appellants , the defend ants below, Yaniv Nakash 1 and Michael Herskowitz appeal the trial court’s July 21, 2023 final judgment awarding appellee , the plaintiff below, Covenant Palms ULGM, LLC (“Covenant Palms”) a joint and several $1 million judgment against appellants. The principal issue disputed at trial was whether the parties had entered into an enforceable, binding contract for the purchase and sale of real prope rty located in Miami, Florida. After conducting a bench trial, the trial court entered detailed findings of fact, finding, inter alia , that the parties had entered into an enforceable, written purchase agreement, and that the buyer, Nakash, had breached t he contract. The trial court further found that Herskowitz, who served as the escrow agent for the transaction, had breached h is fiduciary duty owed to Covenant Palms by releasing the $1 million escrow deposit to Nakash.

Each of the trial court’s factual findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and our de novo review of the trial court’s legal determinations regarding the contract reveal no error. See Evans v. Diaz , 365 So. 3d 1176, 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023) (“[I]ssues of contract interpre tation and formation are review ed de novo, while factual findings are

1 As trustee of the Nakash Family Land Trust

.3

reviewed for competent, substantial evidence.”). Accordingly, we affirm the July 21, 2023 final judgment.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,601,615
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,776,889
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,001,261
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       706,732
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  81,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,168,018
<COMMON>                                     2,426,520
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           (55,743)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,411,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,743,615
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 963,315
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   21,375
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,068,936
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                7,168,018
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,619,823
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            42,364
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,291,778
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,334,142
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        285,681
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           (121,544)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 164,137
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       116,454
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,492
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   78,492
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        46,300
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      123,483
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         310,005
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00



</TABLE>
EF DEPUlY CLERK BY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No, 84595 

# FOLED APR 2 6 2022 IN THE MATTER OF THE RESIGNATION OF RICHARD ALAN MEADOWS, BAR NO. 15283.

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RESIGNATION This is a joint petition by the State Bar of Nevada and attorney Richard Alan Meadows for his resignation from the Nevada bar.

SCR 98(5) provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain. conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security fund matters are pending against Meadows; and that he is current on all membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to his practice of law in this state. SeeSCR 98(5)(a)(1)-(2).

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be approved, and the Board of Governors has approved the application for resignation. See SCR 98(5)(a)(2). Meadows acknowledges that his resignation is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing jurisdiction with respect to matters involving a past member's conduct prior to resignation. See SCR 98(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Meadows has submitted an affidavit of compliance with SCR 115. See SCR 98(5)(e).The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5).

Accordingly, we approve attorney Richard Alan Meadows's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted.

It is so ORDERED.

-

cc: Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Richard A. Meadows Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A cOMO. 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Tasco Holdings International , Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30 , 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      August 11, 2006





By:
            /s/
                David
                KoosDavid
                KoosChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Frezer,
      Inc. and will be retained by Frezer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 3, 2019

Order 

Clerk

July 3, 2019

159160(31)

In re HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION

REGARDING CONSTITUTIONALITY OF

2018 PA 368 & 369 SC: 159160

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of out-ofstate attorneys Seher Khawaja, Lynn Hecht Schafran, and Jennifer M Becker to appear and 

practice in this case under MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.





|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|/s/ | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Chief Executive Officer





|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                  
|    | David R. McHale                                  
|    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date:  May 5, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEV EN T HC IRC U IT April 23, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 14038 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 6 - 2 0 6 7 9 - CR- A SG U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s S T A N F O R D G R E E N , a .k .a . S ta n f

o r d L u n d y G r e e n , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A p r i l23, 2008) B efo re A N D E R S O N , B A R K E T T an d H U L L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: S t a nf or d G r e e n appe a l s hi s c onvi c t i on f orm a ki ng ora i di ng a nd abe tt i ng a2

f a l s e s t a t e me n ti n c o n n e c t i o n w i th a c q u i r i n g a f i r e a r m, i n v i o l a t i o n o f

1 8 U . S. C. § 922( a ) ( 6) , a nd pos s e s s i on of a f i r e a r m by a c onvi c t e d f

e l on, i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S . C . § 9 22 (g)( 1). O n app ea l , he ar gu es thathi s c on vi ct i on shou l d b e r ever se d be c a us e the di s tr i c tc our te rr one ous l y a dm i tt e d pr e j udi c i a l e vi de nc e of

hi s pr i or pu rc hase of three fi re arm s w hi ch occurre d abo ut13 m on ths pri or t o the cr i m es at i ss ue i n thi s c as e a nd for w hi ch he w as no tchar ged. A tthe very l ea st , G re en a r gue s tha ta l i m i t i ng i ns truc t i on s houl d ha ve be e n gi ve n r e ga r di ng the e vi de nc e of th is u n c h a r g e d c r im in a l c o n d u c t. W e r e v ie w a d is tr ic t c o u r t's e v id e n tia ry ru lin g s f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . U ni t e d S t a t e s v. E c kha r dt , 466 F . 3d 938, 946 ( 11th C i r . 2006) , c e r t . de ni e d, ___ U . S . ___, 127 S . C t . 1305 ( 2007) a nd w e f i nd none he r e . E vi de nc e of the S ept em ber 200 5 tra nsac t i on w as suff i ci ent l y i nt ertw i ned w i th the event s i nv ol ved i n thi s tr i a l tha ti tc a nnotbe s a i d tha tthe r e w a s a n abus e of di s c r e t i on i n a dm i tt i ng the e vi de nc e . N ordo w e f i nd a ny e rr ori n the f

a i l ur e t o gi ve a s pe c i f

i c l i m i t i ng in s tru c tio n , e s p e c ia lly a s G r e e n f a ile d to r e q u e s t s u c h a lim itin g in s tru c tio n . AF F I RME D.
Motion granted; Order filed November 29, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 01026

- CR

____________ CHRISTIAN MARQUEZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1434847



### ORDER

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court h er desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967);
Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant’s motion is granted.
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 174th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before December 14, 2016 ; that2

the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on whi ch delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file h er pro se brief with this court within thirty days
of that date.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Alyson M. Mount, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of November 6, 2009 between Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 27, 2015





By: /s/ Alyson M. Mount





Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
#### Luis Alfonso LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1665.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial
  Commercial Corp. (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, James W. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

  By: /S/ JAMES W. STEWART
     ---------------------

  Name:  JAMES W. STEWART
        -----------------------
        Chief Financial Officer


  February 19, 2004


                                      -21-


<PAGE>