alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>


<ARTICLE>                                 UT

<LEGEND>                                  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS
                                          SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                                          EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
                                          BALANCE SHEET, INCOME
                                          STATEMENT AND STATEMENT OF
                                          CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
                                          ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                                          SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
                                          THE NOTES THERETO

<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS

<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                 11,082,492

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               193,894

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                    1,221,535

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  645,470

<OTHER-ASSETS>                            967,977

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            14,111,368

<COMMON>                                  587,520

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                 856,296

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       4,322,562

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>            5,766,378

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     84,550

<PREFERRED>                               237,987

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                      4,239,066

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                        0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                 0



<PAGE>

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>            0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>             103,762

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                 0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>               41,958

<LEASES-CURRENT>                          2,652

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>            3,635,015

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>             14,111,368

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                 1,886,148

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                      92,140

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                1,546,490

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                1,638,630

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   247,518
  
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                        1,374

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            248,892

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  82,284

<NET-INCOME>                              166,608

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>               4,604

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>             162,004

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  123,377

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                 312,203

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    259,784

<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.69

<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.69


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1.2

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joan S. Freilich, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, which this statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   |  | /s/JOAN S. FREILICHJoan S. Freilich
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2004 |  |                                    

---



QuickLinks
815 A.2d 378

#### Mujan SINA, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Respondent.

Misc. AG No. 45,

Sept. Term, 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Jan. 24, 2003.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Petition of Mujan Sina for reinstatement to the Bar of Maryland. The Court having considered the Petition for Reinstatement and the Response of Bar Counsel, it is this 24th day of January, 2003

ORDERED, that Mujan Sina be and she is hereby reinstated to the Bar of Maryland.

It is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court, pursuant to Rule 16-781(1), replace the name of Mujan Sina on the registry of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and to the clerks of all courts in this State.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00357-CV

JERRY TRAVIS DENISON AND 

BRENDA DENISON

APPELLANTS

V.

MISTY MARTIN APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 90TH DISTRICT COURT OF YOUNG COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On September 4, 2012, and September 24, 2012, we notified appellants, in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellants have not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellants have failed to comply with a requirement of the rules 

of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 

2007,2 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 25, 2012

 

2See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil 

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial 

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing 

fees in courts of appeals).
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 0878 Lower Tribunal No. 22

- MM

- 0 22 0 59

_____________________________

J ASON A YCOX , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the County Court for Lee County

.

H. Andrew Swett , Judge.

August 13, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.
TRAVER
, C

. J. , and WHITE and SMITH , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Jason Aycox, Lawtey, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### Edward ELIAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42243.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1973.

Carlton P. Maddox, of Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Boyer & Sulik, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

*4Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.(the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: November 2, 2006
255 La. 914

#### Guy LeBLANC, Jr. v. NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT.

No. 50493.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1970.

In re: Guy LeBlanc, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 231 So.2d 568.

Writs refused. Judgment of Court of Appeal is correct.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03181**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03181\03181_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03181\03181_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03181\03181_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03181\03181_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03181\03181_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03181\03181_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03181\Certification Statement Plant ID 03181.pdf Plant certification statement x 03181\Supplemental Documentation\A5-2 Aerial Map Plant ID No. 03181_CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03181\Supplemental Documentation\A5-3 Water Balance Plant ID No. 03181_CBI.TIF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03181\Supplemental Documentation\03181_CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Tianli Agritech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hanying Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 19, 2013

/s/ Hanying LiHanying Li

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0441

_____________________________

RANDY JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

August 14, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Randy Jackson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2005

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/29 10/3 10/5 16.00 16.00 14.00 45.00 1.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 10/6 10/11 10/12 18.00 17.00 15.00 43.00 7.00

10/13 10/17 10/19 20.00 17.00 15.00 41.00 11.00

10/20 10/24 10/26 18.00 17.00 15.00 41.00 9.00

10/27 10/31 11/2 18.00 18.00 16.00 45.00 7.00

11/3 11/7 11/9 22.00 18.00 16.00 46.00 10.00

11/10 11/14 11/16 22.00 18.00 16.00 48.00 8.00

11/17 11/21 11/23 20.00 18.00 16.00 47.00 7.00

11/23 11/28 11/30 20.00 18.00 16.00 47.00 7.00

12/1 12/5 12/7 18.00 17.00 15.00 51.00 -1.00

12/8 12/12 12/14 13.00 16.00 14.00 51.00 -8.00

12/15 12/19 12/21 14.00 16.00 14.00 48.00 -4.00

12/22 12/27 12/28 16.00 17.00 15.00 48.00 0.00

655.00 601.00 54.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

12-DAY BILL 11/16 11/17 11/18 10.00 10.00 0.00

Matures 11/30

9-DAY BILL 12/2 12/5 12/6 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 12/15

0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

5-Year Note 10/11 10/12 10/15 13.00 13.00

10-Year TIPS (R) 10/11 10/13 10/15 9.00 9.00

5-Year TIPS (R) 10/20 10/25 10/31 9.00 9.00

2-Year Note 10/24 10/26 10/31 20.00 25.82 -5.82

3-Year Note 11/2 11/8 11/15 20.00 20.00

5-Year Note 11/2 11/9 11/15 13.00 23.22 -10.22

10-Year Note 11/2 11/10 11/15 14.00 15.51* -1.51

2-Year Note 11/21 11/23 11/30 20.00 25.35 -5.35

5-year Note 12/5 12/7 12/15 13.00 13.00

10-Year Note (R) 12/5 12/8 12/15 8.00 8.00

2-Year Note 12/26 12/28 12/30 20.00 26.01 -6.01

159.00 115.91 43.09

*Includes $2.8 billion of maturing 25-year bonds

R = Reopening Treasury announced a Q4 NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 97.09

A = Announced borrowing need of $97

Actual Amounts in Italics billion on August 1st
#### MID-CONTINENT AIRCRAFT CORPORATION and Georgia Pacific Corporation v. Truman WHITEHEAD.

No. 50178.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 28, 1977.

Fair & Mayo, James C. Mayo, Louisville, Robert L. Crook, Ruleville, for appellant.

Hathorn & Hathorn, J. Hoy Hathorn, Louisville, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

MOTION TO STRIKE SUSTAINED, APPELLEE GIVEN THIRTY DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE CORRECTED SUPPLEMENTAL ABSTRACT OF THE RECORD.

INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1943 

To extend Federal recognition to the Pee Dee Indian Tribe of McColl, South 

Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina (for himself and Ms. MACE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend Federal recognition to the Pee Dee Indian Tribe 

of McColl, South Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pee Dee Indian Ac5 knowledgement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL RECOGNITION. 

7 (a) FEDERAL RECOGNITION.—Federal recognition is 

8 extended to the Pee Dee Indian Tribe of McColl, South 

9 Carolina. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1943 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY OF LAWS.—All laws (including 

2 regulations) of the United States of general applicability 

3 to Indians or Nations, Indian Tribes, or bands of Indians 

4 (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et 

5 seq.)) shall be applicable to the Pee Dee Indian Tribe of 

6 McColl, South Carolina, and members of that Tribe. 

7 SEC. 3. FEDERAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date of the en9 actment of this Act, the Tribe and each member shall be 

10 eligible for all services and benefits provided by the United 

11 States to Indians and federally recognized Indian tribes, 

12 without regard to— 

13 (1) the existence of a reservation for the Tribe; 

14 or 

15 (2) the location of the residence of any member 

16 on or near an Indian reservation. 

17 (b) SERVICE AREA.—For purposes of the delivery of 

18 services and benefits to members, the service area of the 

19 Tribe shall be considered to be the area comprised of Marl20 boro County in the State of South Carolina. 

21 SEC. 4. MEMBERSHIP ROLL. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—As a condition of receiving rec23 ognition, services, and benefits pursuant to this Act, the 

24 Tribe shall submit to the Secretary, by not later than 18 

25 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, a 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1943 IH

1 membership roll consisting of the name of each individual 

2 enrolled as a member of the Tribe. 

3 (b) DETERMINATION OF MEMBERSHIP.—The quali4 fications for inclusion on the membership roll of the Tribe 

5 shall be determined in accordance with sections 1 through 

6 5 of article III of the proposed constitution of the Tribe 

7 dated December 2020 (including amendments to the con8 stitution). 

9 (c) MAINTENANCE OF ROLL.—The Tribe shall main10 tain the membership roll under this section. 

11 SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS. 

12 For the purposes of this Act: 

13 (1) MEMBER.—The term ‘‘member’’ means an 

14 individual duly enrolled in the roll of the Tribe de15 scribed in section 4. 

16 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

17 the Secretary of the Interior. 

18 (3) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Pee 

19 Dee Indian Tribe of McColl, South Carolina. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-040-1020-001]


Mojave-Southern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council--Notice of 
Meeting, Locations and Times

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Resource Advisory Council Meeting Locations and Times.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C., the 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), council 
meeting of the Mojave-Southern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council 
(RAC) will be held as indicated below. The agenda includes a public 
comment period, and discussion of public land issues.
    The Resource Advisory Council develops recommendations for BLM 
regarding the preparation, amendment, and implementation of land use 
plans for the public lands and resources within the jurisdiction of the 
council. For the Mojave-Great Basin RAC this jurisdiction is Clark, 
Esmeralda, Lincoln and Nye counties in Nevada. Except for the purposes 
of long-range planning and the establishment of resource management 
priorities, the RAC shall not provide advice on the allocation and 
expenditure of Federal funds, or on personnel issues.
    The RAC may develop recommendation for implementation of ecosystem 
management concepts, principles and programs, and assist the BLM to 
establish landscape goals and objectives.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the council. Public comments should be limited to issues 
for which the RAC may make recommendations within its area of 
jurisdiction. Depending of the number of persons wishing to comment, 
and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be 
limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need further information 
about the meetings, or need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact 
Michael Dwyer at the Las Vegas District Office, 4765 Vegas Dr., Las 
Vegas, NV 89108, telephone, (702) 647-5000.

DATES: Date is December 8, 1997, from 1:00 p.m. to approximately 4 p.m. 
and will reconvene on December 9, 1997 and meet from 8 a.m. to 4:40 
p.m. The public comment period will begin at 2 p.m. on December 8, 1997 
at 2:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The council will meet at the Las Vegas District Office, 4765 
West Vegas Drive, Las Vegas, NV.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dan Netcher, District Minerals Specialist, Ely, telephone: (702) 289-
1872.

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
Gene A. Kolkman,
Ely District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-30300 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
# NEU Distribution Transactions T
JOSEPH L. REINHART, P.C.

ATTORNEY AT LAW 7355 SW HERMOSO WAY
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
JOE REINHART (503) 530-8384
Admitted in Oregon & Washington FAX (503) 530-8837

EMAIL: JOE@NWERISALAW.COM

March 26, 2018

VIA EMAIL: Danielle.Norris@treasury.gov

Secretary of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220

Plan: Western States Office and Professional
Employees Pension Fund
Subject: Withdrawal of Application for
Approval of Suspension of Benefits

Dear Secretary of the Treasury:

The Plan is represented by this law firm. Please note the following:

1. The Plan submitted an Application for Approval of Suspension of Benefits under
the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act (“MPRA”), on August 24, 2017.
2: The Plan was subsequently notified by your office that there are several issues that

need to be resolved concerning the application, and that time period for resolving
the issues is ending.

3. With this letter the Plan is immediately withdrawing the incomplete application
made on August 24, 2017.

4. The Plan intends to file a revised MPRA application for Approval of Suspension
of Benefits as soon as administratively possible.

Please feel free to call or email if you have any questions.
JOSEPH L. REINHAR:
_

——

. Reinhart, Plan Attorney

c Board of Trustees
Plan Actuary
Plan Administrator
#### Richard E. KIRTLEY and Susan Estelle Perez, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-882.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 9, 1971.

*283Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were charged and convicted of the possession of marijuana, possession of LSD and possession of narcotic paraphernalia, and sentenced accordingly. This appeal ensued, the principal point relied on for reversal being the sufficiency of the State’s evidence to withstand the defendants’ motion for directed verdict at the close of the State’s case.

The State’s evidence was circumstantial and based on the fact that the appellant, Kirtley, had rented motel facilities wherein marijuana, LSD and narcotic paraphernalia were found. The appellant, Perez, was allegedly living with Kirtley. The State’s evidence in chief disclosed that even *though*Kirtley may have registered for the motel accommodations, these were not in his exclusive possession; and even though the items upon which the convictions were based were found therein, it was incumbent upon the State to show actual knowledge by Kirtley and/or Perez of the existence of the contraband. See: Frank v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 117; Markman v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 486; Langdon v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 321. This not having been done, the State failed to make a prima fa-cie case and the motion for directed verdict should have been granted.

It was clear from the State’s evidence in chief that there had been a number of people in and out of the premises involved on the day in question; none of the evidence placed the appellants in the premises; and the evidence totally failed to demonstrate any actual knowledge of the contraband on the premises. Therefore, the judgments and convictions be and the same are hereby set aside, with directions to discharge the defendants in the trial court.

Reversed with directions.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN STEVENSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 96 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.