alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sources of Variation in Average Tax Rates 

There are two main sources of variation in average tax rates across income classes: 

 The variation in income combined with a progressive tax system leads to, in general, 

higher-income families having high tax rates and lower-income families having lower tax 

rates. 

 The adjustment for family sizes may cause two families with similar incomes and similar 

tax rates to be assigned to two different income classes. 

There are a number of sources of variation in average tax rates within income classes: 

 The adjustment for family size may cause two families with different incomes and 

different tax rates to be assigned to the same income class. 

 Tax rates may depend on the source of income. 

o The preferential treatment of capital gains and dividends, as well as tax-exempt 

interest income, nontaxable pension income and government transfers may cause 

two families with the same income to have different tax rates. 

o Foreign income may be eligible for the foreign tax credit due to taxes paid abroad, 

reducing U.S. tax liability. 

 Some types of income are exempt from tax. Tax exemptions may cause two families 

with the same income and even the same family size to have different tax rates. For 

example, employer-provided health insurance and certain contributions to employersponsored pension plans are tax exempt. Most transfer payments including the majority 

of social security income is also exempt from tax. 

 Certain activities and expenditures may make a family eligible to claim deductions from 

taxable income and credits against tax. 

o Itemized deductions include charitable deductions, casualty and theft losses, real 

estate taxes, state and local taxes, mortgage interest and certain business 

expenditures. 

o Examples of such tax credits include the American Opportunity Tax Credit 

(AOTC) for certain education expenses, the premium tax credit and the saver’s 

credit for certain retirement savings. 

 The presence of older persons and children and other dependents in the family may make 

a family eligible for certain and/or increased tax credits, such as the child and dependent 

care credit, the additional child tax credit, and an increased Earned Income Tax Credit 

(EITC). The tax code also allows an additional standard deduction for age and/or 

blindness and a credit for the elderly and disabled. 

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Tax Analysis

November 19, 2015
#### Carleen Chalk LUND and Lund Realty, Inc., and Norman Wayne Lund, Petitioners, v. Charles E. KINNIG, Sr., and Florida Real Estate Commission, Respondents.

Nos. 77-873, 77-874.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 7, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1978.

*833Benjamin T. Shuman, Orlando, for petitioners.

Manuel E. Oliver, Altamonte Springs, and Howard Hadley, Winter Park, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Our reading of the briefs and examination of pertinent parts of the record lead us to the conclusion that error has not been demonstrated in the Final Agency Order under review.

Accordingly, the Petitions for Writ of Certiorari are denied.

CROSS, DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

Investment Company Act file number  811-08227

 

DWS Investors Funds, Inc.

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 08/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 2/28/09 |
|---------------------------|---------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
#### Russell Leroy ILER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-936.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 25, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                    One Beacon Street
                                    Boston, MA 02108

                                    May 4, 2009



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549


RE:  DWS Core Plus Income Fund (the "Fund"), a series DWS Portfolio Trust (the
     "Trust") (Reg. Nos. 2-13627, 811-42)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Trust
hereby certifies that the form of Prospectuses and Statements of Additional
Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Fund pursuant to Rule
497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No. 104 to the Trust's
Registration Statement on form N-1A (the "Amendment"), do not differ from that
contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent Registration Statement and
was filed electronically on April 28, 2009.

Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (617) 295-3681.

                                 Very truly yours,


                                 /s/Laura McCollum

                                 Laura McCollum, Esq.
                                 Vice President and Counsel
                                 Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.

mal/lm

cc:      Thomas Hiller, Esq., Ropes & Gray
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2312 

To provide for the use of peer support, peer mentoring, and career coaching 

in demonstration projects conducted under the health profession opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social Security Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2021 

Mr. EVANS (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the use of peer support, peer mentoring, 

and career coaching in demonstration projects conducted 

under the health profession opportunity grant program 

under section 2008 of the Social Security Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mentoring and Sup5 porting Families Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2312 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF PEER SUPPORT, PEER MENTORING, AND CA2 REER COACHING. 

3 Section 2008 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 1397g) is amended by redesignating subsections (c) and 

5 (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively, and by insert6 ing after subsection (b) the following: 

7 ‘‘(c) USE OF PEER SUPPORT, PEER MENTORING, 

8 AND CAREER COACHING.— 

9 ‘‘(1) PREFERENCE IN CONSIDERING APPLICA10 TIONS.—In considering applications for a grant 

11 under this section, the Secretary shall give pref12 erence to— 

13 ‘‘(A) applications that include opportuni14 ties for peer support or peer mentoring, and 

15 make career coaching available, as part of the 

16 case management plan; and 

17 ‘‘(B) applications that include a commit18 ment to providing project participants with a 

19 monthly cash stipend equivalent to 50 percent 

20 of the Federal poverty level. 

21 ‘‘(2) INCLUSION AMONG SUPPORT SERVICES.— 

22 A project for which a grant is made under this sec23 tion shall include case management plans that in24 clude career coaching (with the option to offer ap25 propriate peer support and mentoring opportunities 

26 to help develop soft skills and social capital), which 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2312 IH

1 may be offered on an ongoing basis before, during, 

2 and after initial training as part of a career pathway 

3 model.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

6 on October 1, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7292** 

PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. RODNEY MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department; DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., Sheriff, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Department; JAMES TOWNSEND, Property Manager, Monroe Hall; FNU NIPPER, CAT ’ s Safety Manager; SARAH PARKER, North Carolina Chief Justice , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District o f North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv - 00302

- FDW

- DSC )

Submitted : January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Patric k O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Patrick O. Christian appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (200 6 ). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Christian v. Moore , No. 3:10

- cv - 00302

- FDW

- DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2010) . We dispense with oral argume nt because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
NUMBER 13-11-00781-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

EX PARTE JOSE MANUEL MAGANA SURIA

___________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant was convicted of the first-degree felony offense of murder. See TEX.

PENAL CODE ANN. ' 19.02(c) (Vernon 2003). On November 10, 2011, the trial court 

entered an order denying appellant=s request for the appointment of counsel to file a 

motion for forensic DNA testing under Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.01, et. seq. (West Supp. 2010). 

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal regarding this order. 
2

On December 22, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared 

that the order is not appealable and that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was 

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court=s directive. Appellant 

filed a response to this notice, stating that even though the motion is styled as an ex parte 

matter, the Court has jurisdiction. 

The denial of a motion for appointment of counsel in a proceeding involving a 

motion for post-conviction DNA testing is not immediately appealable, but the issue may 

be raised on appeal from an order denying a motion for DNA testing. See Gutierrez v. 

State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 322-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (“The better course is for a 

convicted person to file a motion for DNA testing and, if and when the motion is denied, 

appeal any alleged error made by the trial judge in refusing to appoint counsel. If a 

reviewing court determines that the trial judge erred in failing to appoint counsel, then the 

case will be remanded to the trial court so the convicted person can file a subsequent 

motion for DNA testing with the assistance of counsel.”). Thus, the order denying 

appointed counsel under Chapter 64 is not an appealable order under Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the 

opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the 

appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

8th day of March, 2012.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00184-CV

In re Gordon Paul Swoyer III

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator has filed a motion to dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus, informing 

the Court that real party in interest has withdrawn the discovery requests that were the subject of 

the mandamus petition. Accordingly, we grant the motion, dissolve our temporary stay, and 

dismiss as moot the petition for writ of mandamus.

_________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Filed: June 10, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER INDICATED AS 
REPORTED ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,131,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    999,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,306,500
<PP&E>                                       2,473,600
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,251,600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,493,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,626,400
<BONDS>                                      1,542,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       615,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,902,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,493,500
<SALES>                                      2,772,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,772,400
<CGS>                                        1,882,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,882,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                314,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                   116,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            198,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   198,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
        

</TABLE>
## WiHiams , Rene e (OST) ^Otk^ i IX^^-dST ' ff'lZ'i^'/ ^

Subject : FW : CHISAN AACCES S
.

From : MIK E WAR D [mailto:theoutfitter@aptalaska.net ] Sent : Thursday , Apri l 08 , 201 0 10:3 9 A M To : Little , Cynthi a M (DOT ) Cc : 'Michell e Morris ' l i Subject : CHISAN AACCESS T O STAT E O F ALASKADOT : Regardin g ai rservic e t o Chisana ; i t i s of vita l importance
. M yfamil yha s bee n travelin g t o an d fro m Chisan a annuall y sinc e th e mi d 1970's
. Th e schedule d ai rservic e an d mai l plan e ar e ofvita l importanc e t o al l resident s an d visitor s ofth e Chisan a community
. I hop e t o bu ypropert yi n Chisan a an d possibl yliv e thei ro n a seasona l basi s whe n I retir e i n a fe w years . Sinc e ther e i s n o highwa yaccess , th e ai rservic e i s essentia l a s i t i s th e onl ywa yt o ge t supplie s i n an d t o ge t ou t fo r medica l issues
. Th e communit ywil l no t gro wan d wil l likel yshrin k withou t ai rservice ; i s tha t wha t yo u want ? Pleas e don' t discontinue ai rservic e t o Chisan a Than k yo u fo ryou rconsideration , sincerely , Michae l D
. War d
256 La. 793

#### Charles M. WATERS, Jr. v. C. Edward KARST, Mayor et al.

No. 50711.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1970.

In re: C. Edward Karst applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 235 So.2d 222.

Application not considered. Not filed within the time provided by Article VII, Sec. 11 of Const. of La.
Exhibit 10.23


 


[REDACTED] = Pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)
of Regulation S-K, portions of this exhibit have been omitted as the registrant has determined that certain confidential information contained
in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted because it is both (i) not material and (ii) the type of information that the company
treats as private and confidential.


 





 


	KOITO MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.	TEL : (81)3-3447-5171
	4-8-3, TAKANAWA, MINATO-KU, TOKYO, 108-8711 JAPAN	FAX : (81)3-3447-5173



 


April 14th, 2020


 


Subject: Supplier on Board Agreement


 


Cepton Technologies, Inc. (“Cepton”)
has been chosen to supply LiDAR technology licenses and components to Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (“Koito”) for the [REDACTED]
General Motors [REDACTED] Program (“Program”).


 


Koito Manufacturing will issue supplier requirements
documentation and official sourcing documentation at a later date, according to internal program development milestones.


 


Koito and Cepton will work in collaboration to
support General Motor’s UC LiDAR development timeline, concurrently. Koito will provide any pertinent accompanying sourcing documentation
to Cepton to support on-going development for this program.


 


	OEM:	General Motors
	Koito Manufacturing Location:	Shizuoka, Japan
	Model Year and Program/Platform Name:	[REDACTED]
	OEM Manufacturing Location:	[REDACTED]
	Start of Production:	May 2023
	End of Production:	December 2027
	Part Number:	[REDACTED]
	Usage Per Vehicle:	1 unit
	Average Daily Production Volume:	[REDACTED]
	Maximum Daily Production Volume:	[REDACTED]
	Development Start Date:	January 15th, 2020



 


Koito hereby authorizes Cepton to share this Agreement
or its contents with Cepton’s suppliers that (i) have a need to know such information for purposes of submitting pricing quotations
related to this Program, and (ii) have entered into a confidentiality agreement with Cepton that would protect the disclosure of this
information.


 


Sincerely,


 


	 	KOITO MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Takayuki Katsuda
	 	Takayuki KATSUDA
	 	Director and Managing Corporate Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger
S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


May 12, 2006

/s/ Roger S. Marcus
-------------------
Roger S. Marcus
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Attachment 0 12 – TS1201UC – A risk Assessment

1 of 2 page s 

# SanitizedAttachment 012– TS1201UC – Risk Asessment

2 of 2 page s 

# sanitized
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Pathology and Veterinarian Support Service.
    Date: January 15, 1997.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: EPN, 6th Floor Conference Room, Rm. 640, 6130 Executive 
Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lalita D. Palekar, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 640, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, Telephone: 301/496-7575.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review contract proposals.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being submitted less than 15 days prior to the above 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: December 26, 1996.
Margery G. Grubb,
Senior Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-320 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
| Territory                | Total Funding     | Funding Based on Population | Funding from Even Distribution |
|--------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------|
| American Samoa           | $479,135,254.00   | $29,135,254.00              | $450,000,000.00                |
| Guam                     | $553,582,247.00   | $103,582,247.00             | $450,000,000.00                |
| Northern Mariana Islands | $481,876,521.00   | $31,876,521.00              | $450,000,000.00                |
| Puerto Rico              | $2,470,061,908.00 | $2,020,061,908.00           | $450,000,000.00                |
| Virgin Islands           | $515,344,070.00   | $65,344,070.00              | $450,000,000.00                |
| TOTAL                    | $4,500,000,000.00 | $2,250,000,000.00           | $2,250,000,000.00              |