alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5791-5792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-44; RM-8974]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mills, WY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Mountain Tower Broadcasting proposing the allotment of Channel 288A at 
Mills, Wyoming, as the community's first local aural transmission 
service. Channel 288A can be allotted to Mills in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements at city reference 
coordinates. The coordinates for Channel 288A at Mills are North 
Latitude 42-50-24 and West Longitude 106-22-06.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 24, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 8, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Victor 
A. Michael, Jr., President, Mountain Tower Broadcasting, c/o Magic City 
Media, 1912 Capitol Avenue, Suite 300, Cheyenne, Wyoming 
82001(Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-44, adopted January 
24, 1997, and released January 31, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments.

[[Page 5792]]

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

 Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-3116 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31907]



[[Page 64399]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land management
[ID-957-1020-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plats of the following described land were officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m. November 25, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
Sixth Auxiliary Meridian East (east boundary) and subdivisional lines, 
the subdivisional lines, the subdivision of section 25, and a metes-
and-bounds survey in section 25, T. 7 N., R. 24 E., Boise Meridian, 
Idaho, Group 974, was accepted November 25, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines, the subdivision of section 30, and metes-and-
bounds surveys in section 30, T. 7 N., R. 25 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, 
Group 974, was accepted November 25, 1997.
    These surveys were executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the surveys of 
the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, 
Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, 
Boise, Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-31907 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-66-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Application Tendered for Filing with the Commission

October 21, 1997.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Subsequent License.
    b. Project No.: P-2928-004.
    c. Date Filed: September 29, 1997.
    d. Applicant: Merrimac Paper Company, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Merrimac Hydro Project.
    f. Location: On the Merrimack River in Essex County, near Lawrence, 
Massachusetts.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. Secs. 791(a)-
825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Gerald J. Griffin, Aquamac Corporation, 9 
South Canal Street, Lawrence, MA 01842, (508) 686-0342.
    i. FERC Contact: Mark Pawlowski (202) 219-2795.
    j. Comment Date: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    k. Description of Project: The existing run-of river project 
utilizes flows diverted by the upstream Lawrence Hydro Project and 
consisting of: (1) a trashrack structure; (2) manually operated 
headgate and penstock; (3) three generating units for an installed 
total capacity of 1250-kW; and (4) appurtenant facilities. There is no 
dam and reservoir associated with the project. The applicant estimates 
that the total average annual generation would be 7,300 Mwh. All 
generated power is used by the applicant for its paper manufacturing 
processes.
    l. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the 
MASSACHUSETTS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as required 
by Sec. 106, National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of 
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.
    m. Pursuant to Section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's 
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes 
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to 
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the 
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person 
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60 
days from the issuance date of this notice and serve a copy of the 
request on the applicant.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28339 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Oct - Dec

2007 Actual 91 87 (14) 73 (18) 57

Jan - Mar

2008 Actual 187 191 (15) 176 (11) 46

Apr - Jun

2008 Actual (74) (45) (22) (66) 7 53

Jul - Sep

2008 Actual 179 527 (30) 497 318 372

Oct - Dec

2008 Actual 556 569 (18) 551 (5) 367

Jan - Mar

2009 Actual 565 481 (14) 467 (98) 269

Apr - Jun

2009 Actual 278 343 (17) 327 49 318

Jul - Sep

2009 Actual 415 393 (20) 372 (43) 275

Oct - Dec

2009 Actual 340 260 (3) 258 (82) 194

Jan - Mar

2010 Actual 446 483 (12) 471 25 219

Apr - Jun

2010 Actual 263 344 (10) 334 71 290

Jul - Sep

2010 Actual 362 396 (14) 382 20 310

Oct - Dec

2010 Actual 326 363 (4) 359 33 343

Jan - Mar

2011 Actual 470 265 (20) 245 (225) 118

Apr - Jun

2011 Actual 149 190 (22) 167 19 137

Jul - Sep

2011 Actual 342 286 (23) 264 (79) 58

Oct - Dec

2011 Actual 284 310 2 312 28 86

Jan - Mar January 30, 2012 483 444 (17) 427 (56) 30

2012 Actual 440 401 (3) 398 (42) 43

Memo: Forecast Revision (42) (43) 14 (29) 13 13

Apr - Jun January 30, 2012 123 200 (17) 183 60 90

2012 April 30, 2012 124 182 (6) 175 52 95

Memo: Forecast Revision 1 (19) 11 (7) (8) 5

Jul - Sep

2012 April 30, 2012 253 265 (12) 253 0 95

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SYE C. NEWTON

,

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. §

§ No. 532 , 2015

§

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ C r. ID 0805017969

§

§

§

Submitted: December 23, 2015

Decided: December 30, 2015

ORDE R

This 30 th day of December 2015 , it appears to the Court that, on December

3 , 201 5 , the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause why

his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to fil e his opening brief and

appendix in this matter. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show

cause within the required ten

- day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is

deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court

Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice
#### Jos. D. FARISH, Jr., Appellant, v. LUM’S INC., a Florida corporation, a/k/a Lum’s, Appellee.

No. 69-138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERICK MANUEL MEJIA-ALVARADO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-71071 

Agency No. A088-639-197 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 7, 2019**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Erick Manual Mejia-Alvarado, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing MejiaAlvarado’s appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying MejiaAlvarado’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71071 

§ 1252(a)(1), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition. We review de 

novo questions of law. Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008). 

The record does not compel the conclusion that Mejia-Alvarado established

changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse his untimely asylum application.

8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4)-(5).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Mejia-Alvarado’s claimed social group of 

his family, because he did not raise that social group before the BIA. See Barron 

v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to 

review claims not presented to the agency). Mejia-Alvarado does not challenge the 

agency’s determination that he failed to establish he did or will experience 

persecution on account of political opinion or his proposed social group of “people 

of some means that were being targeted by gangs or guerrillas that the government 

was unable to control that were using money to extort and kill.” See MartinezSerrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically 

raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, Mejia-Alvarado’s

withholding of removal claim fails.

Mejia-Alvarado also does not challenge the agency’s denial of CAT relief, 

so that issue is similarly waived. Id.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### William Belmont GILLESPIE, Petitioner, v. Malcolm E. BEARD, as Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-349.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 23, 1969.

Habeas corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 101497D]


Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing 
Operations; Atlantic Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan 
Environmental Assessment

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 4, 1997, NMFS published a notice of availability 
of a draft Environmental Assessment (EA) on the alternatives being 
considered for implementation of the Atlantic Offshore Cetacean Take 
Reduction Plan. NMFS is hereby extending the public comment period for 
an additional 30 days.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 4, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft EA or the draft Atlantic Offshore 
Cetacean Take Reduction Plan may be obtained from Chief, Marine Mammal 
Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910, or by calling (301) 713-2322.
    Written comments should be submitted to Chief, Marine Mammal 
Division, Office of Protected Resources, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910, fax: 301/713-2322.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Cornish, Office of Protected 
Resources, (301) 713-2322.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 4, 1997, NMFS published a notice 
of availability of a draft EA on the alternatives being considered for 
implementation of the Atlantic Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan. 
The notice indicated that comments must be received on or before 
December 4, 1997.
    NMFS has since received a request to extend the public comment 
period for an additional 30 days. This request is made because at least 
2 members of the Atlantic Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Team will be 
out of the country for a large portion of the public comment period and 
would be unable to sufficiently review and comment on the EA. NMFS 
agrees that the current public comment period is not long enough to 
allow for sufficient public comment in lieu of other previous 
commitments by members of the team.
    NMFS hereby extends the public comment period for an additional 30 
days, until January 4, 1998.

    Dated: November 24, 1997.
Patricia A. Montanio,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-31315 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 31315-22-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINES SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                           2,156
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  648,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    616,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,289,374
<PP&E>                                         520,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                 261,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,712,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,076,053
<BONDS>                                        217,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       230,695
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,712,051
<SALES>                                      2,185,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,185,654
<CGS>                                        2,005,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,005,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               132,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (320)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,580
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF CRACKER BARREL FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 26, 1996,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           AUG-2-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-29-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-26-1996
<CASH>                                          16,746
<SECURITIES>                                    13,391
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,389
<PP&E>                                         641,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 618,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,379
<BONDS>                                         17,290
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,155
<OTHER-SE>                                     497,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   618,008
<SALES>                                        440,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               440,495
<CGS>                                          154,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,976
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,328
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,328
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
814 A.2d 468

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. James E. STANCIL, Respondent. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, v. John H. Rhines, Respondent.

Misc. AG. No. 71,

Sept. Term, 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Dec. 30, 2002.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Suspension by Respondent, by Consent, for Sixty (60) Days filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 30th day of December, 2002;

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that James E. Stancil, be, and is hereby, suspended for a period of sixty (60) days from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, to commence on March 1, 2003, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the judgment shall be entered in the favor of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, in the amount of $319.37 for costs against James E. Stancil, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall strike the name of James E. Stancil from the register of attorneys, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

*514
      *ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Suspension by Respondent, by Consent, for Sixty (60) Days filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 30th day of December, 2002;

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that John H. Rhines, be, and is hereby, suspended for a period of sixty (60) days from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the judgment shall be entered in the favor of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, in the amount of $319.37 for costs against John H. Rhines, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall strike the name of John H. Rhines from the register of attorneys, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
#### APPROVED DRY WALL CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Sam PETRULLI et al., Appellees.

No. 73-159.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10 - 19 - 00300 - CR
GABRIEL DWAIN HALL , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018
- 804 - C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION
The jury convicted Gabriel Hall of the offense of aggravated assault and assessed punishment at forty years confinement. We affirm. Hall’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in support of the motion stating that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

.H all v. State Page 2

Counsel's brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and compliance with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. at 7 44; High v.
State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); s ee also In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the proceedings, ... decide whether the case is who lly frivolous." See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. at 744; see Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); accord Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals , 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this appeal, we determine the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). According ly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Hall is granted.

JOHN E. NEILL Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Affirmed; motion granted Opinion delivered and filed March 2 3 , 2020 Do not publish [CRPM]
Impurity and CAS Registry Number

(a)

Maximum

percent

(b)

Confidential

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI

CBI CBI

CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

TS-S081UY

( CBI )

Attachment 3

 Page 1/1