alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6045

MICHAEL PAGE, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-2895-6-20AK) Submitted: July 23, 2004 Decided: September 20, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Page, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* By order filed June 2, 2004, this appeal was placed in abeyance for Jones v. Braxton , No. 03-6891. In view of our recent decision in Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363 (4th Cir. 2004), we no longer find it necessary to hold this case in abeyance for Jones . - 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Page seeks to appeal from the district court’s order finding that his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) was successive and dismissing it without prejudice. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. * 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Page has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. To the extent that Page’s notice of appeal and appellate brief can be construed as a motion for authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition, we deny such authorization. SeeUnited- 3 - States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 496 (2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

November 19, 2021

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Madam Speaker:

On October 18, I informed you that I had determined that a debt issuance suspension period
(DISP) would continue through December 3, 2021, with respect to the Civil Service Retirement
and Disability Fund (CSRDF).

I am writing to notify you, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8348(1)(2), of my determination that, by reason
of the statutory debt limit, I will be unable to fully invest the portion of the CSRDF not
immediately required to pay beneficiaries, and that the DISP previously determined to end on
December 3, 2021, will continue through December 15, 2021. As a result, during such period,
Treasury will continue to generally suspend additional investments of amounts credited to the
CSRDF, as authorized by law.

In addition, because the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 provides that
investments in the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund (PSRHBF) shall be made in the
same manner as investments for the CSRDF, Treasury will also suspend additional investments
of amounts credited to the PSRHBF. By law, the CSRDF and PSRHBF will be made whole
once the debt limit is increased or suspended. Federal retirees and employees will be unaffected
by these actions.

Again, I respectfully urge Congress to act to protect the full faith and credit of the United States.

Sincerely,

i


Identical letter sent to:

cc:

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy, House Republican Leader
The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Majority Leader
The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican Leader

The Honorable Richard E. Neal, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Kevin Brady, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Ron Wyden, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance

The Honorable Mike Crapo, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
Exhibit 32



March 22, 2024

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with the Annual Report of ECA Marcellus
Trust I (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of
the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its
knowledge:



(1)            The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



(2)            The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.



The above certification is furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.



| | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Trustee for ECA Marcellus Trust I
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                   
| | By:                                                                               
| |
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 17, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-17138 

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00365 CV-FTM-29DNF

JAMES BYROM,

MISSION UNITY, INC.,

a Florida not-for-profit corporation,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA,

a political subdivision of the State of Florida,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(January 17, 2007)

Before ANDERSON, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the
2

judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed for the reasons fully discussed

at oral argument. With respect to appellants’ argument concerning the district

court’s failure to give appellants’ requested charge concerning community

prejudice, we conclude that the charge given by the district court encompassed the

requested charge, and that appellants have failed to persuade us that the jury

misunderstood the law applicable to the case. We cannot conclude that the district

court abused its discretion in denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. 

Appellants’ other arguments on appeal are rejected without need for further

discussion. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.
## Facility Data

Facility Name - DEC ID 

### Utica Metal Products **6-3016-00065** Address 1526 Lincoln Ave. Utica, NY 13502 Type of business Job Shop # of Employees 

### 73 Hours of Operation per year 

### 2500 Annual Revenue ($) 

### 5,000,000 

## Process Type Decorative electroplating 

## Tank Design and Operation Dim ensions (inches) 

### 34L x 22Wx 36H Rectifier Capacity 

### 0-12 volts, 750 amps, 9 KW Annual Hours of Operation 

### 2500 

## Emisison Control Technology Type of control/control device fume supressant - Zero-Mist Liquid R control device operating parameters 45 dynes/cm Em ission test data Complete test report 

## Exhaust design Em ission point EP00002

Stack height (m) 

### 9.7536 32 feet Stack diameter (m) 

### 0.256 inches: 16.5 Lx 19.25 W Exit velocity

(m/sec) 

### 2.05 6.725 ft/sec cubic meters per minute 

### 25 890 cfm Exit temperature (K) 

### 294 70 degrees F 

## Other Available Supporting Documents Em ission Inventory

Report 2009 Chromium release lbs/yr 

### 40 Permit Application/Operating permit Title V - online http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/32249.html Process flow diagrams/plant layout Attached: 3 drawings in 2 filesinches: 16.5 Lx 19.25 W 6.725 ft/sec 70 degrees FRinse Rinse Drip tray Rinse Rinse Nickel Rinse Bright Nickel Vat

Sem i Bright Nickel Rinse

Rinse Rectifier Controls

Chrome Plating Tank

Ni Strip

Nickel Activator Pickleen AS-10 Hot Rinse

Not to Scale DI Rinse Rinse Warm rinse Rinse Zincate Electro Cleaner Sparkleen 367 Caustic Rinse Nickel Pickle 5% Rinse

### Nickel Chrome Plate

tank length width depth freeboard **activator** 36 36 36 4 202.02 179.57 **160 cleaner** 48 30 36 4 224.47 199.53 **nickel pickle** 60 30 36 3 280.58 257.20 **Semi-bright nickel** 72 30 36 4 336.70 299.29 **Bright nickel** 72 30 36 4 336.70 299.29 **chrome** 34 22 36 4 116.60 103.64 **chrome spray rinse** 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81 **chrome rinse 1** 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81 **chrome rinse 2** 24 24 36 4 3.00 79.81 **chrome rinse 3** 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81 **chrome rinse hot** 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81



# Process Tank Volumes

maximum volume operating

volume
PROTOCOL

Amending the Agreement between

the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the 

States of Jersey for the Exchange of Information Relating to Taxes, 

signed at Washington, on November 4, 2002.

The Government of the United States of America and the Government of 

the States of the States of Jersey (hereinafter “the parties”),

Desiring to amend the Agreement between the Government of the United States 

of America and the Government of the States of Jersey for the Exchange of 

Information Relating to Taxes, signed at Washington, on November 4, 2002,

Acknowledging that the Government of the States of Jersey has been entrusted, 

under the terms of the Entrustment from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 

Northern Ireland, to negotiate, conclude, perform and subject to the terms of this 

Agreement terminate a tax information exchange agreement with the Government 

of the United States of America,

Have agreed as follows:
ARTICLE I

Paragraph 1 of Article 4 (Definitions) shall be amended by deleting the words 

“and for Jersey, the Comptroller of Income Tax or his delegate, except that until a 

date not later than January 1, 2006, Her Majesty’s Attorney General for Jersey 

may act as the competent authority in respect of criminal tax matters” and 

replacing them with “and for Jersey, the Minister for Treasury and Resources or 

his authorized representative”.

ARTICLE II

The following shall be added after Article 5 (Exchange of Information 

Upon Request):

“ARTICLE 5A

Automatic Exchange of Information

1. The competent authorities of the parties may automatically transmit 

information to each other for the purposes referred to in Article 1 (Scope of 

the Agreement). The parties shall determine the items of information to be 

exchanged pursuant to this Article and the procedures to be used to 

exchange such items of information. 

2. The competent authorities of the parties may mutually agree on 

additional procedures to be used for the purposes of this Article.

ARTICLE 5B

Spontaneous Exchange of Information

The competent authority of a party may spontaneously transmit to the 

competent authority of the other party information that has come to the attention 

of the first-mentioned competent authority and that the first-mentioned competent 

authority supposes to be foreseeably relevant to the accomplishment of the 

purposes referred to in Article 1 (Scope of the Agreement). The competent 

authorities of the parties shall determine the procedures to be used to exchange 

such information.”
ARTICLE III

The parties shall notify each other in writing when their necessary internal 

procedures for entry into force of this Protocol have been completed. This

Protocol shall enter into force on the date of the later of such written notifications. 

In witness whereof, the undersigned, being duly authorised thereto by the 

respective parties, have signed this Protocol. 

Done at _____ in duplicate, this __ day of _____, 20__.

FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF 

THE UNITED STATES OF THE STATES OF JERSEY:

AMERICA:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 06, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 06, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0044. MARQUISE ALI ROBBINS v. THOMAS A. COX, JR., JUDGE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 08SC73922
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Deviation From the Department of Energy Assistance Regulations

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of class deviation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE), pursuant to 10 CFR 600.4, 
hereby announces two deviations from its Financial Assistance Rules for 
cooperative agreement awards to commercial organizations resulting from 
the Program Research and Development Announcement for Integrated Fuel 
Cell Systems and Components. The first deviation will allow for monthly 
submissions of financial and progress reports. The second deviation 
will allow for an original and four copies of technical reports. It is 
anticipated that approximately 20 cooperative agreement awards will be 
made to commercial entities.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In this notice, the Department of Energy 
announces that, pursuant to 10 CFR 600.4, the Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Procurement and Assistance Management has made a 
determination of the need for a class deviation to the Department's 
Financial Assistance Rules. A deviation to 10 CFR 600.151(b) has been 
approved which provides that recipients of cooperative agreement awards 
resulting from the Program Research and Development Announcement for 
Integrated Fuel Cell Systems and Components for Transportation and 
Buildings, will be required to submit to DOE monthly instead of 
quarterly reports for the Milestone Report, Project Status Report, and 
Financial Status Report. The fuel cell program requires these reports 
on a monthly basis for the purpose of coordinating and comparing 
project performance and costs among fuel cell program-participants to 
avoid not only duplication of research effort, but to coordinate any 
shared testing equipment, and to provide timely and meaningful 
technical direction as required.
    The deviation at 10 CFR 600.151(e) will allow for submission of an 
original and 4 copies of the Program Management Plan, Quarterly 
Technical Progress Reports, Topical Reports, and Final Technical 
Report. The program reviewers of the technical reports are located at 
both DOE Headquarters and Argonne National Laboratory.
    Approval of these deviations ensures that the program goals and 
objectives are achieved and that public funds are conserved.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Langston, (202) 586-8247.

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 21, 1997.
Richard H. Hopf,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance Management.
[FR Doc. 97-31253 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-U
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00147-CV

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Continental Imports Holding, Inc. d/b/a 

Mercedes-Benz of Austin, Appellants

v.

Joseph Yousefy, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-03-002179, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In Appellants’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal Pursuant to Settlement, Mercedes-Benz

USA, LLC and Continental Imports Holding, Inc. d/b/a Mercedes-Benz of Austin represent that they

no longer wish to pursue this appeal, that the dismissal would not prevent an entitled party from

seeking relief, and that appellee Joseph Yousefy is not opposed to the dismissal. We grant the

motion and dismiss this appeal.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: June 1, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31789]


      
========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 63920]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: December 9, 1997; 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20547.

CLOSED MEETING: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c) (2) and (6))

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Brenda Thomas at (202) 401-3736.

    Dated: December 1, 1997.
David W. Burke,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 97-31789 Filed 12-1-97; 11:49 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
1

Transport Airplane Directorate

1601 Lind Ave, S.W.

Renton, Washington 98057-3356

May 14, 2013

Mr. Jonathan Moritz

Delta Engineering

13 DBRA Way

New Castle, DE 19720

Dear Mr. Moritz:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 25.251 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). We have entered your April 23, 2013, exemption request on 

behalf of Delta Engineering into the public docket No. FAA-2013-0391. However, the information you sent 

doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed), and so we are unable to process your 

request any further. For us to consider your request, you must send us all of the following:

 Each exemption must reference a specific STC project which must include a description of the specific 

modification being made to the external configuration of the airplane and the specific airplane make and 

model.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

The FAA cannot grant a single exemption that would apply to all of your STC projects that modify the external

configuration of the airplane. You must apply for an exemption for each STC project, include a description of 

the specific modification project, and specify the airplane make and model to be considered for an exemption by

the FAA.

You can cancel this request and send us an application for each STC project. For each STC project requesting 

an exemption, you must describe the external modifications for that specific project, specify the airplane make 

and model, and the regulation(s) requiring an exemption. 

You can also keep this application open by limiting it to modifying a specific external configuration for an STC 

project and reference the airplane make and model for that STC project. If you decide to keep this application 

open, you must send us the required information within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request 

open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have 

any questions or require additional time, you may call 425-227-2793.

Sincerely,

Michael Menkin

Technical Writer-Editor, Transport Airplane Directorate

Aircraft Certification Service

Enclosure
Docket number: FAA - 2014 - 0752
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Utilities (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Charles W. Shivery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and John H. Forsgren, Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



/s/ Charles W. Shivery

(Signature)

Charles W. Shivery

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ John H. Forsgren

(Signature)

John H. Forsgren

Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



November 5, 2004





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.