alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00879-CR

Matthew Douglas HAYES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10842W

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal is hereby 

GRANTED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6185

GARY LEE HARRIS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00057-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Lee Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary Lee Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil action 

advising the district court of an appeal pending with the Supreme Court of Virginia. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Harris v. Virginia, No. 1:17-cv-00057-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2017). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
#### Frank RIZZO, Appellant, v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT, Appellee.

No. P-29.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 1, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64039-64040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31603]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

[Docket No. 301-116]


Cancellation of Public Hearing in Section 302 Investigation: 
Honduran Protection of Intellectual Property Rights

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 31, 1997, the United States Trade Representative 
(USTR) initiated an investigation under section 302(b) of the Trade Act 
of 1974 with regard to acts, policies, and practices of the Government 
of Honduras with respect to the protection of intellectual property 
rights, and proposed to determine that these acts, policies and 
practices are actionable under section 301(b) and that the appropriate 
response is a partial suspension of tariff preference benefits accorded 
to Honduras under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and 
Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI) programs (62 FR 60299 of November 7, 
1997). The annex to that notice set forth a list of articles of 
Honduras which could be subject to the suspension of tariff preference 
benefits. The USTR also invited interested persons to submit written 
comments and to participate in a public hearing on December 4, 1997, 
concerning the proposed determinations and action. Due to a lack of 
response, the December 4, 1997 hearing is hereby canceled. Written 
comments are still due by December 10, 1997.


[[Page 64040]]


ADDRESSES: Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20508.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Morrissy, Office of Trade and Development, Office of the United 
States Trade Representative, (202) 395-6971, or William Busis, Office 
of the General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade 
Representative, (202) 395-3150.
Irving A. Williamson,
Chairman, Section 301 Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-31603 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, David J. Vajda, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Columbia Energy Group on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date:  May 9, 2005
    By:
    /s/ David J. VajdaDavid J. VajdaPrincipal Financial Officer
#### Collins A. TAYLOR, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46231.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1971.

Alfred Lee Felder, Pascagoula, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by John M. Kinard, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

*416GILLESPIE, Presiding Justice:

Conviction of robbery: sentence five years.

After careful consideration of the questions ably and vigorously presented by defendant’s attorney together with the evidence, we are of the opinion that the jury was justified in returning the guilty verdict, and that the trial court committed no reversible error in the conduct of the trial. It is, therefore, our considered opinion that the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

RODGERS, JONES, BRADY and INZER, JJ., concur.
TBS INTERNATIONAL PLC
& SUBSIDIARIES  EXHIBIT
23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
   We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-144206 and 333-161839) and Form S-8 (No. 333-137518 and 3330137517)
of TBS International plc of our report dated March 16, 2010 relating to the
financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
   /s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 New York,
NY
 March 16,
2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59883-59884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,665; TA-W-33,665A]


Anvil Knitwear, Incorporated; Aynor, SC and Gibson, NC; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for

[[Page 59884]]

Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 24, 1997, applicable to all 
workers of Anvil Knitwear, Incorporated, Aynor, South Carolina. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on September 4, 1997 (62 
FR 46775).
    At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers on the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in employment related to the production of T-shirts and tank tops. New 
information provided by the company shows that worker separations 
occurred at the subject firm's Gibson, North Carolina facility when it 
closed in September, 1997. The workers are engaged in employment 
related to the production of T-shirts. Accordingly, the Department is 
amending the certification to cover workers of Anvil Knitwear, 
Incorporated, Gibson, North Carolina.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Anvil Knitwear, Incorporated adversely affected by increased 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,665 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Anvil Knitwear, Incorporated, Aynor, South 
Carolina (TA-W-33,665) and Gibson, North Carolina (TA-W-33,665A) who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
May 24, 1996 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of October, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-29220 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Blueprint





 






	


Exhibit 10.1




	


AMENDMENT 2


	


TO THE


	


COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AGREEMENT


	


BETWEEN


	


GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY


	


AND


	


ENDRA LIFE SCIENCES INC.


	
 


	

This
Amendment 2 to the Collaborative Research Agreement ("Amendment"),
effective as of the last date of signing below ("Effective Date"),
amends the TERM between General Electric ("GE") & ENDRA Life
Sciences Inc. ("Endra"), which became effective as of April 22,
2016, as amended by that certain Amendment 1 to the Collaborative
Research Agreement, dated April 21, 2017
("Agreement").


	

RECITALS


	

WHEREAS,
the parties wish to amend the Agreement to provide for a revised
TERM, which includes changes to the Agreement as set forth
below;


	

THEREFORE,
the parties hereby agree to the following amendment:


	

1. Section 9.1
of Collaborative Research Agreement shall be deleted and restated
as follows:


 



This Agreement will remain in effect until January 22, 2020 unless
terminated sooner or extended in writing signed by the parties in
accordance with this Agreement.


	

2. Capitalized
terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meanings assigned
in the Agreement.


	

3. Except as
explicitly modified, all terms, conditions and provisions of the
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


	

4. In the
event of any inconsistency or conflict between the Agreement and
this Amendment, the terms, conditions and provisions of this
Amendment shall govern and control.


	

5. This
Amendment and the Agreement constitute the entire and exclusive
agreement between the parties with respect to this subject matter.
All previous discussions and agreements with respect to this
subject matter are superseded by the Agreement and this
Amendment.







 


Acceptance
of these terms is documented by the signature and date of the
responsible parties in the space designated below.

 


	


GE Healthcare


 

	

ENDRA Life Sciences Inc.


 


	

Signature: /s/
Brian
McEathron                      




 

	

Signature:
/s/ Francois
Michelon                   




 


	

Name:
Brian McEathron  
                 
           



 

	

Name:
Francois
Michelon                           
  



 


	

Title:
GM General Imaging
Ultrasound         




 

	

Title:
CEO                                                      




 


	

Date:
January 30,
2018                                  




 

	

Date:
January 6,
2018
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IGNACIO GALVAN-INCLAN, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72447 

Agency No. A087-991-730 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2020**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. 

Ignacio Galvan-Inclan, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the legal question 

of whether a particular social group is cognizable, except to the extent that 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 8 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72447 

deference is owed to the BIA’s interpretation of the governing statutes and 

regulations. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241-42 (9th Cir. 2020). We 

deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in concluding that Galvan-Inclan did not establish 

membership in a cognizable social group. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 1125, 

1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular group, 

“[t]he applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of members who 

share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3)

socially distinct within the society in question’” (quoting Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 

I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014))); see also Ramirez-Munoz v. Lynch, 816 F.3d 

1226, 1228-29 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding “imputed wealthy Americans” returning 

to Mexico did not constitute a particular social group); Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 

600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2010) (concluding “returning Mexicans from the 

United States” did not constitute a particular social group). Thus, Galvan-Inclan’s

withholding of removal claim fails. 

Galvan-Inclan’s request to remand for termination of proceedings, set forth 

in his opening brief, is denied. See Aguilar Fermin v. Barr, 958 F.3d 887, 895 (9th 
3 18-72447 

Cir. 2020) (omission of certain information from a notice to appear can be cured 

for jurisdictional purposes by later hearing notice).

As stated in the court’s September 18, 2018 order, the temporary stay of 

removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, James E. Hausman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CTCommunications, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CT Communications,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
     (b) [Intentionally omitted]
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: April 27, 2005     By: /s/ James E. Hausman      James E. Hausman   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP94-220-016]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Refund Report

November 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 21, 1997, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest) filed a refund report pursuant to Section 5.1 
of its Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (Settlement) filed on 
November 14, 1995 in its Docket No. RP94-220 general rate proceeding. 
The Settlement was accepted and approved by the Commission on February 
16, 1996.
    Northwest states that the refund covers the period from November 1, 
1996 through February 28, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before December 4, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31651 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
McFee Tunnel on the Spruce Railroad Trail

Port Angeles, Washington

The Spruce Railroad Trail follows the historic railroad 

grade of the Spruce Railroad. The trail is part of the 

134-mile long Olympic Discovery Trail which will 

eventually connect Port Townsend to La Push, 

Washington. The Spruce Railroad Trail project 

consisted of reopening a half-mile segment of the 

original trail along with refurbishing the McFee 

Tunnel, which runs approximately 450 feet along the 

trail. The Spruce Railroad Trail is a popular trail in the 

State of Washington which offers hikers, bicyclists, 

equestrians and disabled people with a safe 

alternative to the traffic hazards of US Highway 101 on 

Lake Crescent’s southern shore.

In 1918, during World War I, the U.S. Army Signal Corp 

built the Spruce Railroad Trail to haul Sitka Spruce to 

mills for the manufacture of airplanes. Unfortunately, 

the trail was completed in 1919, a year too late for its 

intended purpose. 

Nearly 70 years after blasting the tunnel mouth shut 

in the early 1950s, the Western Federal Lands Highway Division (WFLHD) began removing the debris that blocked 

the opening on the east end of the McFee tunnel. Additionally, work was done to stabilize the nearby rock walls 

and build a new entrance structure and facade for the tunnel. 

 
2

In April 2017, the crew blew out the south end of the tunnel 

which opened the entire tunnel. The next task was to install 

rock bolts and dowels and install sheet drain in preparation for 

the shotcrete application.

 

Following the tunnel prep, workers used shotcrete to cover the inside tunnel walls, reinforcing the strength of 

the tunnel structure. Unlike concrete, shotcrete does not require shaping into forms. Workers applied shotcrete 

by pneumatically spraying the mix directly onto the forms followed by around-the-clock moist cure.

 BEFORE SHOTCRETE DURING SHOTCRETE APPLICATION

 

SHOTCRETE APPLICATION AFTER SHOTCRETE
3

The northeast portal Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall around the arch pipe was constructed in June 2017. 

The arch pipe will become the new entrance to the McFee Tunnel. Both the northeast and southeast portal MSE 

walls were mirror images of each other. Once completed, the northeast portal entrance received a facade 

reminiscent of the original tunnel.

On July 15, 2017, the Spruce Railroad Trail and 

McFee Tunnel was officially opened to the 

public. 

Over 100 people were in attendance for the 

ribbon cutting, but many more will experience 

the trail and tunnel, both now and in the future.