alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM N-PX ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF DWS International Equity Portfolio Investment Company Act file number  811-6702 DWS International Equity Portfolio (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)  345 Park Avenue New York, NY  10154 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code) John Millette Secretary One Beacon Street Boston, MA  02108-3106 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code:617-295-1000 Date of fiscal year end:10/31 Date of reporting period:7/1/08-6/30/09 Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles. A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.   ******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-06702
Reporting Period: 07/01/2008 - 06/30/2009
DWS International Equity Portfolio









================== D       DWS INTERNATIONAL EQUITY PORTFOLIO ==================

There is no proxy  voting  activity  for the fund,  as the fund did not hold any
votable positions during the reporting period.

========== END NPX REPORT  
 SIGNATURES [See General Instruction F] Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. (Registrant)
        DWS International Equity Portfolio
  By (Signature and Title)*/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark, Chief Executive Officer
 Date8/17/09 * Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

AN OVERVIEW OF

Tribal Governments’ HAF Quarterly 

and Annual Reports

October 2022
2

Disclaimer

This presentation is designed to give an overview of the 

Homeowner Assistance Fund (HAF) quarterly reporting process 

under the HAF program for educational purposes. It should not 

be construed as legal advice or a statement of binding policy 

guidance from the Treasury. 

For official Treasury guidance, go to: www.Treasury.gov/HAF
3

Importance of Compliance Reporting

Link to 2022 Compliance Supplement
4

Review before you start

Go to: http://www.treasury.gov/HAF

New resource!
5
6

Reporting Deadlines
7

Tips

• Enable pop-ups in your browser

• Browsers that work well with the portal:

• Microsoft Edge

• Google Chrome

• Most recent version of Safari

• The Treasury Portal does not work well on Internet Explorer.

• Accessing Treasury’s Portal requires ID.me or Login.gov

• Only the authorized user can submit a HAF Plan

• Click “save” when you’ve completed each section then click “next” to move 

forward to the next section

• Look for the validation buttons at the end of each page which may require 

scrolling:
8

Finding Reports

Report Type 

Click to edit

Click to open
9

Quarterly Report
10

Participant Information
11

Budget Reporting
12

Budget Reporting - Errors

Be sure to click this box.
13

Programmatic Information
14

Programmatic Information
15

Programs

1

2
16

Add/Edit Program
17
18

Design Element Errors
19

Obligations & Expenditures Verification
20

Participant Compliance
21

Certification

Your Name email@service.com

Your Title 1

2

3
22

Annual Report
23

Finding Reports

Report Type 

Click to edit

Click to open
24

If your Tribe’s HAF Plan has not yet been approved
25

If your Tribe has not yet submitted a HAF Plan
26
27
28

Community Engagement & Outreach
29

Entering Performance Goals
30

Entering Goal information
31

Performance Goals
32

Methods for Targeting
33
34
35
36

Thank you.

Questions?

Please contact the HAF Program Team at 

haf_tribal@treasury.gov

For More Information: 

Please visit Treasury’s HAF website at 

www.Treasury.gov/HAF
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 14, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 14, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A1501. THE STATE v. AVERY FOSTER.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing VI, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maurice C. Werdegar, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Maurice C. Werdegar


Maurice C. Werdegar


President and Chief Executive Officer


March 17, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30997]



[[Page 63133]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the President's Security Policy Advisory Board

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Security Policy Advisory Board has been 
established pursuant to Presidential Decision Directive/NSC-29, which 
was signed by the President on September 16, 1994.
    The Board will advise the President on proposed legislative 
initiatives and executive orders pertaining to U.S. security policy, 
procedures and practices as developed by the U.S. Security Police 
Board, and will function as a federal advisory committee in accordance 
with the provisions of Pub. L. 92-463, the ``Federal Advisory Committee 
Act.''
    The President has appointed from the private sector, three of five 
Board members each with a prominent background and expertise related to 
security policy matters. General Larry Welch, USAF (Ret.) will chair 
the Board. Other members include: Admiral Thomas Brooks, USN (Ret.) and 
Ms. Nina Stewart.
    The next meeting of the Board will be held on 12 December 1997, at 
1330 hours at Marriott Hotel, 8026 Leesburg Pike, Tysons Corner, VA. 
22182. The meeting will be open to the public.
    For further information please contact Mr. Terence Thompson, 
telephone: 703-602-9969.

    Dated: November 20, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-30997 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40254

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID KEITH SPIGNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-CV-566)

______________________________________________

December 16, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Spigner, #03420-078, filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in

federal custody. To the extent that Spigner requires a certificate

of appealability to appeal the denial of his motion, it is GRANTED.
2

With respect to Spigner’s claim that he received ineffective

assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to obtain to the

amount of crack cocaine attributed to him for sentencing purposes,

Spigner has not demonstrated any deficient performance on counsel’s

part. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-94 (1984). With

respect to the other claims of ineffective assistance of counsel

that Spigner raised for the first time on appeal, Spigner has not

established plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto.

Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); United States

v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc) (the

plain error standard), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).

This court has rejected equal protection challenges to the

constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines for crack offenses.

See United States v. Watson, 953 F.2d 895, 897-98 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 504 U.S. 928 (1992).

Finally, we find Spigner’s Commerce Clause challenge to 21

U.S.C. § 860 is devoid of merit. See United States v. Lopez, 115

S. Ct. 1624, 1630 (1995); United States v. Gallo, 927 F.2d 815, 823

(5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                                 UT

<LEGEND>                                  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS
                                          SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                                          EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
                                          BALANCE SHEET, INCOME
                                          STATEMENTS AND STATEMENTS OF
                                          CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
                                          ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                                          SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
                                          THE NOTES THERETO

<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS

<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PER-BOOK

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    11,126,081

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     217,745

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,117,706

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        605,515

<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  948,410

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               14,015,457

<COMMON>                                        587,559

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       856,455

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           4,242,133

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                5,686,147

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            84,550

<PREFERRED>                                     237,866

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          4,288,383

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               15,000

<PAGE>

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                             0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                        0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   202,630

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                             0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      41,265

<LEASES-CURRENT>                                  2,704

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                3,456,912

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                14,015,457

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     3,390,162

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            118,130

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    2,894,476

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    3,012,606

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         377,556

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  629

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  378,185

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        164,018

<NET-INCOME>                                    214,167

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       9,207

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   204,960

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        246,763

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       313,289

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          313,718

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.87

<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.87



</TABLE>
#### Bandy B. PEOPLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-877.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 20, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0196 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DANE ANTHONY GIBSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 27 2022

05/27/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0196
#### Robert RACINO, Appellant, v. Elmer SAXON and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 70-416.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 14, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30737]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2649]


Office of Foreign Missions (OFM); 60-Day Notice of Proposed 
Information Collection; DS-1972, Drivers License and Tax Exemption Card 
Application

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Originating Office: The Office of Foreign Missions (OFM).
    Title of Information Collection: DS-1972, Drivers License and Tax 
Exemption Card Application.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: DS-1972.
    Respondents: Foreign mission personnel and their dependents in the 
United States.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 12,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 6,250.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: October 31, 1997.
Eliza McClenaghan,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30737 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-44-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2147 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2147

 To prohibit States and local educational agencies that ban books from 
   receiving funds under the Student Support and Academic Enrichment 
                            Grants program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2021

  Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit States and local educational agencies that ban books from 
   receiving funds under the Student Support and Academic Enrichment 
                            Grants program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guarding Readers Independence and 
Choice Act'', or the ``GRINCH Act''.

SEC. 2. LOSS OF ELIGIBILITY FOR BANNING BOOKS.

    Subpart 1 of part A of title IV of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7111 et seq.) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new section:

``SEC. 4113. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
subpart, except as provided in subsection (b), a State or local 
educational agency that has in place any law or policy that prohibits 
the availability of books or other written materials to students, 
teachers, or schools within such State or local educational agency 
based on a determination that such books or materials contain offensive 
or outdated language or images shall not be eligible to receive funds 
under this subpart.
    ``(b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to prohibit a State or local educational agency from 
prohibiting the availability of books or other written materials that 
contain obscene or pornographic text or images or content that is 
harmful to minors.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mrs. Ramona G. EDWARDS v. CAVALIER INSURANCE CORP.

No. 50538.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 23, 1978.

Jacobs, Griffith, Pearson, Eddins & Po-vall, Benjamin E. Griffith, Lindsey C. Meador, Cleveland, for appellant.

Luckett, Luckett, Luckett & Thompson, W. 0. Luckett, Jr., Clarksdale, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Bolivar County; J. C. Feduccia, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2155 

To require the Corps of Engineers to notify affected communities before 

releasing water contaminated with cyanobacteria from flood risk management projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mr. MAST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Corps of Engineers to notify affected communities before releasing water contaminated with 

cyanobacteria from flood risk management projects, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Toxic Health Threat 

5 Warning Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2155 IH

1 SEC. 2. RELEASES OF WATER CONTAMINATED WITH 

2 CYANOBACTERIA. 

3 (a) DETERMINATION.—Before releasing water from 

4 a flood risk management project, the Secretary shall deter5 mine whether the water is contaminated with 

6 cyanobacteria, based on tests conducted by the Secretary, 

7 another Federal agency, or the State in which the flood 

8 risk management project is located. 

9 (b) NOTIFICATION.—If the Secretary determines 

10 under subsection (a) that water to be released from a flood 

11 risk management project is contaminated with 

12 cyanobacteria, the Secretary shall notify the public and 

13 affected governments of the contamination and planned 

14 release, and any potential effects on human health, before 

15 releasing the water. 

16 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

17 (1) AFFECTED GOVERNMENT.—The term ‘‘af18 fected government’’ means a State, local, or Tribal 

19 government with jurisdiction over an area that will 

20 be affected by a release of water from a flood risk 

21 management project. 

22 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

23 the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 

24 of Engineers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Rex S. Jackson, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Gigamon Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 28, 2017


/s/ Rex S. JacksonRex S. JacksonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)








-1-
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Johnny LAWRENCE.

No. 62450.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 1978.

In re: Johnny Lawrence, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, and stay order. Parish of Concordia.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy by appeal in the event of conviction.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2010 of Fitwayvitamins, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Margret Wessels, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.






Dated:   February 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Margret WesselsMargret Wessels

President and Director

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

Principal Accounting Officer