alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Leroy J. DARBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 4210.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 29, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 15, 1973.

Writ Refused Nov. 9, 1973.

W. D. Atkins, Jr., Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by Timothy J. McNamara, Lafayette, for defendants-appellees.

Before SAVOY, HOOD and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

HOOD, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation suit instituted by Leroy J. Darby against Gray-co Marine Corporation and Travelers Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.

The trial judge found that plaintiff had failed to carry the burden of proof necessary to establish his alleged disability. We have reviewed all of the evidence and agree with the findings of the trial judge. We conclude, therefore, that there is no error in the judgment rendered by the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demands.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this proceeding are assessed to plaintiff-appellant.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Stephen Samuel Strick, Admitted on October 6, *2601975, at a Term of the Appellate Division, First Department.

[739 NYS2d 815]

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ. [See 257 AD2d 127.]
#### BLACKHAWK HEATING & PLUMBING CO., INC., and Andrew Machata, Appellants, v. DATA LEASE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 73-278.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 16, 1974.

John A. Gentry, III, of Moyle, Gentry, Jones & Flanigan, West Palm Beach, and Richard Joseph Brennan and Edward J. Wendrow of Winston & Strawn, Chicago, for appellants.

Robert T. Scott, Palm Beach, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied specific performance and plaintiffs appeal. We have reviewed the final judgment in light of the excellent appellate presentations and thereby conclude that there has been no demonstration of reversible error. The critical decisions that the contract terms were *119vague and uncertain and that the option had not been properly exercised find adequate competent support in the record, Finding no error of law or otherwise, the judgment is

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., WALDEN, J., and GONZALEZ, JOSE A., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
#### JACK McNEIL CHEVROLET-BUICK, INC. v. Norman Ray SIMS, d/b/a Sims Construction Co.

No. 46934.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 18, 1972.

Smith, Smith & Tate, Picayune, for appellant.

Williams & Smith, Picayune, for appel-lee.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pearl River County; Vernon H. Broom, Judge.

Affirmed.
JDO

October 19, 2017

U.S. Secretary of the Treasury
US DEPT OF THE TREASURY
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220

RE: Withdrawal of March 30, 2017
Application for Approval of Benefit Suspension for

ALASKA IRONWORKERS PENSION TRUST
65001.485

Dear Sir or Madame:

As an authorized representative of the Board of Trustees for the Alaska Ironworkers
Pension Trust (the “Plan”), you are hereby notified by this letter that the Plan hereby
withdraws its Application filed on March 30, 2017 for approval of benefit suspension under
the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (“MPRA”). The Plan fully intends to file
with the Treasury Department a new application for approval of suspension of benefits
under the MPRA on or before December 29, 2017.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Charles‘A. Dunnagan
Plan Attorney,
Alaska Ironworkers Pension Trust

cdunnagan@jdolaw.com
CAD/jdk

ce: Via Email
Danielle Norris, US DEPT OF THE TREASURY (Danielle.Norris@treasury.gov)
Alaska Ironworkers Pension Trust — Board of Trustees
Mark Olleman, MILLIMAN CONSULTANTS & ACTUARIES (Actuary)
Donna Whitford, WPAS, INC. (Plan Administrator)

(00755342)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2791

_____________________________

REINALDO CORTES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County.

Jennifer Johnson, Judge.

May 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Reinaldo Cortes, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Multi-Market Income Trust, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| July 30, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark           |
|---------------|-------------------------------|
|          | Michael G. Clark              |
|          | President                     |
|          | DWS Multi-Market Income Trust |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Multi-Market Income Trust, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| July 30, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|---------------|---------------------------------------|
|          | Paul Schubert                         |
|          | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|          | DWS Multi-Market Income Trust         |
#### James A. RUTHERFORD v. D. R. HASSFURDER.

No. 39406.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-68-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

December 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 26, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company [ANR] 
tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to become effective 
December 1, 1997:

Twenty-ninth Revised Sheet No. 8
Twenty-ninth Revised Sheet No. 9
Twenty-eighth Revised Sheet No. 13
Thirty-third Revised Sheet No. 18

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
to implement recovery of approximately $1.6 million of above-market 
costs that are associated with its obligations to Dakota Gasification 
Company (Dakota). ANR proposes a reservation surcharge applicable to 
its Part 284 firm transportation customers to collect ninety percent 
(90%) of the Dakota costs, and an adjustment to the maximum base tariff 
rates of Rate Schedule ITS and overrun rates applicable to Rate 
Schedule FTS-2, so as to recover the remaining ten percent (10%). ANR 
also advises that the proposed changes would decrease current quarterly 
Above-Market Dakota Cost recoveries from $2.5 million to $1.6 million, 
based primarily upon a one-time refund from Northern Border Pipeline 
Company.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31995 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 23.1





Silberstein Ungar, PLLCCPAs and Business Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com





March 23, 2011



To the Board of Directors of

Global GSM Solutions, Inc.

Carson City, Nevada



To Whom It May Concern:





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Global GSM Solutions, Inc. of our report dated March 18, 2011, relating to the financial statements of Global GSM Solutions, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the periods ending January 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from inception to January 31, 2011.



Sincerely,



/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC



Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
#### John RABREAU, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43235.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 269 So.2d 64.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
### SERVE D DECEMBE R1 , 200 9 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASmNGTON , D.C
. I N TH EMATTE RO F CIT Y O FBRIDGEPORT , CONNECTICU T

Respondent
. DOCKE T NO
. CP09NE000 1 (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) DM S NO
. FAA-2009-097 7
ADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDGE' S ORDE RGRANTIN G MOTIO N FO REXTENSIO N O FTIM ET O FIL EANSWE R B y alette r

date dNovembe r

24 , 2009 , counse l for

th e Responden t seek s an extensio n o f

th e deadlin e for

filin g th e answe r

t o th e complaint
. Th e reques t

state s tha t

counse l for

th e Complainan t

ha s assente dt o extensio n o f th e deadlin e "u p t o an dincludin g February 2 , 2010. " Fo r goo dcaus e shovm , th e Respondent' s reques t i s granted , an dth e tim e fo r filin g th e answe r

i s extende dt o Februar y 2 , 2010
. Furthe r request s fo r

relie f o f thi s natur e shoul db e mad e b y motion
. Se e 1 4 C.F.R
. § 13.218
. ll'^ l



### Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e la w Judg eFA A Docke t No
. CP09NE000 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y
Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Honorabl e Bil l Finch , Mayo r Cit y o f Bridgeport , Responden t City Hal l Anne x 99 9 Broa dStree t Bridgeport , C T 0660 4 Mark T
. Anastasi , Respondent' s Counse l City Attorney , City o f

Bridgepor t 99 9 Broa dStree t

2" " Floo r Bridgeport , C T 06604-432 8 TEL : 203-576-808 2 FAX : 203-576-825 2 Joh n R
. Donnelly , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ANE- 7 Ne w Englan dRegio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 2 New Englan dExecutiv e Park Burlington , MA 01803-529 9 TEL : 781-238-704 3 FAX : 781-238-705 5 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne y 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
## In t he Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 24

- 00065

- CR

RYAN PATRICK JOHNSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 09F0319

- 102

Before Stevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

After a jury found Ryan Patrick Johnson guilty of murder, he was sentence d to ninety

nine years’ confinement in prison. On December 27, 2023 , Johnson filed a motion in the trial
court seeking entry of a nunc pro tunc judgment. On February 14, 2024, the trial court entered
an order denying Johnson’s motion. Johnson appeal ed the trial court’s order.
In Texas, a party may only appeal whe n the Texas Legislature has authorized an appeal.

Galitz v. State , 617 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). When the L egislature passes
legislation granting a right of appeal, in addition to granting its citizens that substantive right, it
also grant s the appellate courts of this State jurisdiction to hear such appeals. In the absence of

such authorizing legis lation, appellate courts are without jurisdiction and have no authority to

act. In the criminal context, the Texas Legislature has authorized a p peal s from written
judgments of conviction and a few orders deemed appealable. See Gutierrez v. State , 307

S.W .3d 318, 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The trial court’s February 14 order denying Johnson’s

motion for a nunc pro tunc judgment is not an order f rom which the Texas Legislature has
authorized an appeal. In the absence o f such an authorization, we are without jurisdiction to hear
the appeal.
By letter dated May 8
, 2024, we informed Johnson of this jurisdictional issue. Johnson
did not respond to our letter

.3

B ecause the trial court’s February 14 order denying Johnson’s motion for a nunc pro tunc
judgment is not an appea l able order, we lack jurisdiction over th is appeal. Consequently, we
dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Charles van Cle ef Justice

Date Submitted: June 11 , 2024 Date Decided: June 12 , 2024

Do Not Publish
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jessie James WASHINGTON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 53808.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Jessie James Washington applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The matter is moot, trial judge’s return indicates that the matter has been set for hearing on September 6, 1973.
#### Hercules ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 9, 1969.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender; and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, *614and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2.2**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert N. Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2006, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: May 3, 2006
#### Harry G. GOWENS, for the use and benefit of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, v. KEY FORD, INC., and Ford Motor Company, Appellees.

No. FF-308.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 15, 1977.

William R. Ptomey, Jr., Pensacola, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED and REMANDED. While we specifically do not rule on the ultimate resolution of this case, we hold that the lower court erred in directing a verdict against Appellant. The testimony he presented and the reasonable inferences therefrom were sufficient to send the case to the jury. It is the jury’s duty to weigh and evaluate all of the testimony in cases of this type. *Cromarty*v. *Ford Motor Co.,*341 So.2d 507 (Fla.1977).

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2005 and for the period then ended.





|/s/ Thos E. CappsThos. E. Capps
Chief Executive Officer
May 4, 2005
|-------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Thomas N. ChewningThomas N. Chewning
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer 
May 4, 2005
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2051 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2051

   To designate methamphetamine as an emerging threat, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2021

Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Curtis) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate methamphetamine as an emerging threat, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Methamphetamine Response Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. DECLARATION OF EMERGING THREAT.

    (a) In General.--Congress declares methamphetamine an emerging drug 
threat, as defined in section 702 of the Office of National Drug 
Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 (21 U.S.C. 1701), in the 
United States.
    (b) Required Emerging Threat Response Plan.--Not later than 90 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of 
National Drug Control Policy shall establish and implement an Emerging 
Threat Response Plan that is specific to methamphetamine in accordance 
with section 709(d) of the Office of National Drug Control Policy 
Reauthorization Act of 1998 (21 U.S.C. 1708(d)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.1

|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|Annual Servicer Compliance
 Certificate         
|pursuant to                                     
|Section 3.9 of the Sale and
 Servicing Agreement
|and                                             
|Item 1123 of Regulation AB                      
|                                                
|                                                
|                                                
|USAA AUTO OWNER TRUST
 2010-1                   
|                                                
|                                                

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of USAA Federal Savings Bank, as servicer (in such capacity,
the Servicer) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
February 24, 2010 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in
effect from time to time, the Sale and Servicing Agreement), by and among
USAA Auto Owner Trust 2010-1, USAA Acceptance, LLC, the Servicer and The Bank
of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | A review of the activities
 of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31,
 2011, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was
 conducted under my supervision.
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2. | To the best of my
 knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
 obligations in all material respects under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
 throughout such period.                  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed
this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 30thday of
March, 2012.

| |                         | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | /s/ TIMOTHY P. BOOKER   | 
| |                         | 
| | Name: Timothy P. Booker | 
| | Title: Vice President   | 

---