alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

****SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington D.C.  20549

**FORM 10-QSB
Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d)Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934****

For Quarter Ended:      **September 30, 2003**
Commission File Number:         0-4846-3

**                                LumaLite Holdings, Inc                             **(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

	                              	    NEVADA                                                             82-0288840                   (State or other jurisdiction of                                          (IRS Employer                    incorporation or organization)                                          Identification No.)

378 North Main, #124; Layton, Utah   84041(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number including area code:			(801) 497.9075

Former Address, if changed since last reportIndicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorterperiod that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filingrequirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X    No

        21,714,490(Number of shares of common stock the registrant hadoutstanding as of November 19, 2003)**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 3 79 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CLAYTON LEE WELLKNOWN ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 5 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 28 2021

01/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0379
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31467]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 15, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Credit Commercial de France, S.A., Paris, France; to acquire 
International Finance Corporation, Paris, France, and thereby engage in 
extending credit and servicing loans, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(1) of 
the Board's Regulation Y; activities related to extending credit, 
pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(2) of the Board's Regulation Y; financial 
and investment advisory activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(6) of 
the Board's Regulation Y; agency transactional services for customer 
investments, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(7) of the Board's Regulation 
Y; and investment transactions as principal, pursuant to Sec.  
225.28(b)(8) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 25, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-31467 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
ادا

 د طن ار

ات اذ دل  آ  و و )

 ا ا إل ه اة إذا د ر إ اا أرو اا لل ا 

َ 

ار  جار  ط ر ل ا.

 ا أ ر و:

ر 

 د ي

 أر  ري 

 د ذ ادر ال ااداتن ات اا ا ام ا ت ار اا  إ ا اري

و ايم ا ال إت ا ا

 د ي و أرإذا اص أ ط ر ل ب إ ا أده: ّ

ا ا ا ل ا

1.

2.

3.

4.

 ار أ إ أ و اة ابل أ درك أ أم  ا وا دات

ط ا  ات ا أ و و و اا.

ا ________________________________ ار _________________________________________

 او _________________________ اان ________________________________________
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7124
MARVIN H. MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES H. WHITWORTH, Warden; DAVID CHANDLER, Captain, in their official capacities and as individuals, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1555-2-17AJ) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin H. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Whitworth , No. CA-96-1555-2-17AJ (D.S.C. June 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1.2

   Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Joan S. Freilich, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, which this statement accompanies,
(the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Joan S. Freilich
                                                   ---------------------
                                                   Joan S. Freilich

Dated: November 13, 2002
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-149-CR

ALFRED CARL KING	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Alfred Carl King appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for DNA testing.  In a single point, appellant complains that the trial court may have improperly considered his guilty plea when ruling on the motion.  We affirm.

	A trial court may order DNA testing only if, among other things, it finds that identity was or is an issue in the case.2  The court is prohibited from finding that identity was not an issue based solely on a defendant’s guilty plea.3  If the defendant admitted to committing the crime, however, identity is not an issue, even if the defendant also pleaded guilty.4

	In this case, appellant was convicted of murder pursuant to a plea bargain.  In ruling on appellant’s motion for DNA testing, the trial court found that appellant admitted that he fired a gun three times into the house where the murder occurred, that he fired the gun that shot and killed the victim, and that he told another person that he killed the victim.5  Because appellant admitted to killing the victim, his identity was not an issue in the case.  Therefore, the trial court properly denied appellant’s motion for DNA testing.

	We overrule appellant’s point and affirm the trial court’s order denying DNA testing.	

							PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	CAYCE, C.J.; WALKER and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  January 12, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          135
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 8,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                    409
<INVENTORY>                                   9,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             17,589
<PP&E>                                       63,469
<DEPRECIATION>                               17,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               66,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        81,391
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         76
<OTHER-SE>                                  (17,453)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 66,012
<SALES>                                      59,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             59,658
<CGS>                                        55,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                59,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (795)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (4,489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (4,489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (4,489)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (2.98)


</TABLE>
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2005

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/31 4/4 4/7 20.00 18.00 15.00 63.00 -10.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 4/7 4/11 4/14 16.00 18.00 15.00 63.00 -14.00

4/14 4/18 4/21 12.00 18.00 15.00 64.00 -19.00

4/21 4/25 4/28 14.00 19.00 16.00 62.00 -13.00

4/28 5/2 5/5 16.00 20.00 16.00 59.00 -7.00

5/5 5/9 5/12 18.00 20.00 17.00 55.00 0.00

5/12 5/16 5/19 18.00 20.00 17.00 49.00 6.00

5/19 5/23 5/26 18.00 20.00 18.00 51.00 5.00

5/26 5/31 6/2 18.00 20.00 18.00 53.00 3.00

6/2 6/6 6/9 16.00 20.00 18.00 55.00 -1.00

6/9 6/13 6/16 14.00 20.00 18.00 54.00 -2.00

6/16 6/20 6/23 14.00 20.00 17.00 54.00 -3.00

6/23 6/27 6/30 14.00 20.00 17.00 54.00 -3.00

678.00 736.00 -58.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

9-DAY BILL 4/5 4/5 4/6 20.00 20.00 0.00

Matures 4/15

12-DAY BILL 6/1 6/2 6/3 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 6/15

0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

5-Year Note 4/11 4/13 4/15 15.00 15.00

10-Year TIPS (R) 4/11 4/14 4/15 10.00 10.00

5-Year TIPS ® 4/21 4/26 4/29 12.00 12.00

2-Year Note 4/25 4/27 4/29 24.00 26.30 -2.30

3-Year Note 5/4 5/10 5/16 22.00 22.00

5-Year Note 5/4 5/11 5/16 15.00 22.00 -7.00

10-Year Note 5/4 5/12 5/16 14.00 17.63 -3.63

2-Year Note 5/23 5/25 5/31 24.00 23.91 0.09

5-year Note 6/6 6/8 6/15 15.00 15.00

10-Year Note (R) 6/6 6/9 6/15 9.00 9.00

2-Year Note 6/27 6/29 6/30 24.00 23.73 0.27

184.00 113.56 70.43

R = Reopening Treasury announced a Q2 NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 12.43

A = Announced borrowing need of $12

billion on Jan 31st
Treasury approves Wisconsin’s plan to invest $42 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Wisconsin

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $42 million for Broadband Infrastructure (21% of CPF allocation)

 Locations to Be Served: 8,000 (estimated)

 Program Description: Wisconsin’s Broadband Infrastructure Projects program is a competitive 

grant program that aims to invest in broadband infrastructure projects designed to provide 

consistent, reliable service to households in Wisconsin that currently lack consistent speeds of 

100/20 Mbps. 

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to locations upon project completion. 

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: Public Service Commission of Wisconsin

On May 15, 2023, Treasury approved Wisconsin’s request to increase the funding from $40M to 

$42M. This fact sheet reflects these changes.

Wisconsin Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
### -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/28 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ● ●

● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### Paul W. HOFFMANN and Camille O. Hoffmann, his wife, Appellants, v. DELRAY BEACH WHITEHOUSE APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-686.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 5, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Stewart, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
|                  |   |                                                              |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: March 16, 2015 | By:    | /s/ Robert Heckes                                                 |   |
|                  |   | Robert HeckesChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
|                  |   |                                                              |

|                  |   |                                                             |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: March 16, 2015 | By:    | /s/ Robert Heckes                                                |   |
|                  |   | Robert HeckesChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer |
|                  |   |                                                             |
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Georgia

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Georgia over 

$125 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Camilla Bancshares, Inc. Camilla CDFI $ 13,708,000 

Carver Financial Corporation Savannah CDFI & MDI $ 15,852,000 

Citizens Bancshares Corporation Atlanta CDFI & MDI $ 95,700,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2006

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/28 10/2 10/5 12.00 17.00 15.00 44.00 0.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 10/5 10/9 10/12 14.00 18.00 16.00 40.00 8.00

10/12 10/16 10/19 14.00 18.00 16.00 41.00 7.00

10/19 10/23 10/26 18.00 18.00 16.00 41.00 11.00

10/26 10/30 11/2 18.00 18.00 16.00 43.00 9.00

11/2 11/6 11/9 22.00 18.00 16.00 45.00 11.00

11/9 11/13 11/16 24.00 18.00 16.00 45.00 13.00

11/16 11/20 11/24 24.00 18.00 16.00 50.00 8.00

11/22 11/27 11/30 20.00 18.00 16.00 50.00 4.00

11/30 12/4 12/7 16.00 18.00 16.00 54.00 -4.00

12/7 12/11 12/14 14.00 18.00 16.00 56.00 -8.00

12/14 12/18 12/21 11.00 18.00 16.00 55.00 -10.00

12/21 12/26 12/28 10.00 18.00 16.00 51.00 -7.00

657.00 615.00 42.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

15-DAY BILL 11/28 11/29 11/30 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 12/15

8-DAY BILL 12/5 12/6 12/7 12.00 12.00 0.00

Matures 12/15

0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-Year TIPS ® 10/10 10/12 10/16 8.00 17.30 -9.30

5-Year TIPS® 10/19 10/23 10/31 8.00 1.00

2-Year Note 10/23 10/25 10/31 22.00

5-Year Note 10/23 10/26 10/31 14.00 22.48 21.52

3-Year Note 11/1 11/7 11/15 21.00

10-Year Note 11/1 11/8 11/15 13.00 57.56

2-Year Note 11/21 11/28 11/30 22.00

5-year Note 11/21 11/29 11/30 14.00 22.67 13.33

10-Year Note® 12/7 12/12 12/15 8.00 8.00

2-Year Note 12/21 12/27 1/2 * 22.00

5-year Note 12/21 12/28 1/2 * 14.00 24.00 12.00

166.00 144.01 45.89

Estimates are italicized

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 87.89

R = Reopening

* The September two and five-year note auctions settle on October 2. As a result, that borrowing is counted as part of the fourth 

quarter's net cash raised. The December auctions settle in January and thereby are not part of the October-December cash flow pattern.
Exhibit
32.1





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF
MASCOT VENTURES INC.





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mascot Ventures
Inc. for the year ended October 31, 2010, the undersigned, Wendy Wildmen,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Mascot Ventures Inc., does hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Mascot Ventures Inc.





Date:  January
      31, 2011/s/
      Wendy WildmenWendy
      WildmenPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer (and principal financial officer
      and principal accounting
officer)
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds

Allocations to State Governments

May 10, 2021

The American Rescue Plan Act (the Act) established the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery 

Fund (CSFRF) and Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, which provide a combined $350 

billion in assistance to eligible state, local, territorial, and Tribal governments to help turn the 

tide on the pandemic, address its economic fallout, and lay the foundation for a strong and 

equitable recovery. This document describes Treasury’s methodology for allocating the funds to 

state governments. 

Allocation methodology

The CSFRF provides $195.3 billion to the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Of this 

amount, the Act requires $25.5 billion to be allocated equally to the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. The Act also requires $754.9 million to be paid to the District of Columbia, which is 

equal to difference between the amount that the District of Columbia would have received from 

the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) had the District of Columbia been treated as a state rather 

than as a territory under the CRF allocations provided by the CARES Act.

After the equal allocation to the 50 states and the District of Columbia and the “additional 

amount” for the District of Columbia, approximately $169 billion remains. The Act requires that 

this remaining amount be allocated to each state and the District of Columbia:

...in an amount which bears the same proportion to such remainder as the 

average estimated number of seasonally-adjusted unemployed individuals (as 

measured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics 

program) in the State or District of Columbia over the 3-month period ending 

with December 2020 bears to the average estimated number of seasonallyadjusted unemployed individuals in all of the 50 States and the District of 

Columbia over the same period.

To implement this provision, Treasury used the latest available data from the Bureau of Labor 

Statistics1 at the time of issuance of the Interim Final Rule. 

Treasury made a small adjustment to the allocations pursuant to the requirement in the Act that 

no state or the District of Columbia receive less than it did from the CRF, inclusive of the 

amounts allocated under the Act to counties, metropolitan cities, and non-entitlement units 

within a state or the District of Columbia. 

1 For an overview of the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program, see:

https://www.bls.gov/lau/. In performing the calculations, Treasury used data from the LAUS database on the Bureau 

of Labor Statistics’ website, accessed at: https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/.
#### Manuel Ramon ECHEVARRIA, and Milqueya Echevarria, Appellants, v. Rogelio GOMEZ, as Assignee of Salvador Gomez and Marjorie Gomez, his wife, Appellees.

No. 73-1432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.