alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13 -00331- CV

In the Interest D.T., a child §

§

§

§ From the 323rd District Court

o f Tarrant County (323

- 9762 9J

- 12 )

January 23, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered th at the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bob McCoy_________________

Justice Bob McCoy
CHARTERED

1100  1177 West Hastings Street

ACCOUNTANTS

Vancouver, B.C.  V6E 4T5

MacKay LLP

Tel: 604-687-4511

Fax: 604-687-5805

Toll Free: 1-800-351-0426

www.MacKayLLP.ca









December 22, 2003

Our file No. 823 01290



Mr. Cameron King

RedCell Power Corporation

440 Stevens Drive

West Vancouver BC V7S 1C6





Dear Sirs:



Re:

Interim Quarterly financial statements for RedCell Power Corporation



We have performed a limited review of the interim financial statements of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.   Our limited review was solely to conform to the US Securities Exchange Commission Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B and should not be used or referred to for any other purpose.



We have not issued a report for the limited review.  If, in any filing with the SEC, the company states that the interim financial statements have been reviewed by an independent public accountant, a report must be filed with the interim financial statements.





Yours truly,

MacKay LLP





Sean Gilbert



Sean Gilbert, CA

Partner





Q:\82301290\#wp\letters\september 2003review(signed)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD 

### UnauthorizedAir Transportation, Unfair andDeceptivePractices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

### Unfair andDeceptivePractices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT :; -·-·

DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: March 31, 2015
Respectfully submitted,

Blane Workie Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
Vinh Q. Nguyen Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-71523 Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that onthis 31st day ofMarch, 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the.following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 ByFirst Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 Scot Spencer 22604 Esplanada Circle BocaRaton, Florida 33433
R±

8

CEU£ ZL-F-I

}Zoo BAKEA ST

CAUSE M0> /JP,f9lS6 ~A

MO, JH-rt-OOLlZZ-CA

CounTY Count o l#H TH

tdcj -io

SlO Nuw&ejZ -02926,020

DATES H-13-IS

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRHWNA1 APPEALS

JUL 1 « 2015

iT/liAL XufiGE I h(OtiO/lfiP>LE LESLIE &/ZOCK -//9 /£!<?

moTicf romp^A/^Ji fiLEb oi4 OecemqeA JLTHJo/3

qmiTed siates District clerks office

p.O,/SnX LIOIO /-/oUSToM. IEXAS 77 20S>-/0I0

Homormle Sim Lake, PresiOi^g.

MV/O ^ GA/LDfjy* CLERK.

Lorenzo D/JAyME .joMES v. {Jilljam sTepheMS} Director

T'ncS-rjf) the case aI/maer. is 1q/3-c\/-o3G>73

MATURE OF THE CLAIM JS HABEAS CORPUS hiQ< IS30

.Lme^zclJIlIb^jl Somes \j, qeficeA-M. /VM5JLJli£^

Vase Momkm. is 4* is -r.\/-03G72 kIaTu/ie oF THE

CLAim ClMlE RlGHIS A/O.T« .5/5*0

A 3JIA /JDS PASSED THAT CoBlFlEf) IHE HOLE of

\LEMiTjj/9aJ FSSEfJTiAL BMF> LoMG -HELD fiOcTRME IHfiT

PF.rtoiRFS fiXnoaE To r.oMs r/?/)£ osxectjveas/

AmAlGunnS CRimitiAL STAinTES IM FAVOR Oh THE

bEF'E^r)^T] fJITH THE PROL/FEMTioM OF FRj/n/sJAL

OFFEMSE foR &EMMIQR MeVER ISEFoRE CRlMiMALiZEb

WD OFTeM VAGOEh/ i^fUTEA* ITIS (fflPofiJA^TTo GRAtfT

PRoTeQTioM 1& lAbrtlbUALS U)Uo Alfif HME aJEVER

RFALllEb THAI THE/ lJERE COfWfiiTlMG A CRIME
j£Z rtPATiMOEl

/a/ A MMRol) FREE-^PBECll R/JLIMG} THE DMlTED St/tTzS

SriPRE/nz COURT MADE II ALlJflE HARDER WoMDA'/,WME 1ST

Zdis 7o proszcote people for, wkimg iHR.mTmi.MG

SJhTEJYLEAJJS^lAHlA .CJML-0.FJkE_EiR5±

A/y&Jfi/VEMTj THE moiiT 1^ A 7-2 GeC/SIOM REVERSE

XkEXZ)MS/JLC7JJ3J±J2E^ UltinSE

-E&£TL£jD£AJh5JMGS SEEFIeO IHRlMJJEtUblG To HJ1

£,3JZAi^GEL\^AlEIL^jLE£^Cq^^^

To PeoVE THAT THE: SPeaK&L //AD Some AidARE 1^1ESS.THAT

MuUA5„Jl(iiM^SamETH.jdG^

L&&JlJL)LnEME£M^D£^

RES/JLTS OF ^ P)GT lJiTHouT GDM^lDEjeiMG Tfi£ DeFeMOAMTS

MEMTAL .TFaTE, CHIEF So^TlCE JbHM R.O&ERTS JR./JAoTE

iJMl^S^OojMBUlLU^JLM. CQMSClQUSJlQJSE^£MldALt_JllL.

AEASQMjaIG IM ROBERTS l7?AJbRlT/ OPlMlOhi J7)IGHT //£/£

\CJ77IERS IM SIMILAR rJRcumsTAMCES. STEVeM £• SHAPIRO^ i

\Matiomal Legal. Director of the pfiericaiJ civil. Liae&Ties

\l)MioM; Praisea The DecisioM as ome Thft PrqPeRLj

i£gCac^Z^£_Z^JlJ^^-iML^5 FOR GEMIMIES REQUIRED

THE CoVERMlripMr To PROVE CRimiMRL iaJTEMT BEFORE

^PlfiTiMG SoFiEOME Ihi TAIL,, IHAT PRlMClPLE IS ESPEC/ALLf

imPORTAMT CJHEM A PRPSEiStiTioM IS BASED OM A AeFeMDAMIS

AMDS SHAPIRO SAID iM A STATEMENT XOBERTS MIQTeD

THAT FloMiS CoHVlCTiod OJAS PREW/SE SoLeL/ gW
m. COMliMUEJ

Houd HIS STATEMENT'S POSTED UPDID BE OMDeRSTOOD By A REASnMAfiLE PERSOM, ROBERTS SAID THAT'

\LJHILE THE REASOMABLE PERSOM STANDARD U)AS A

FAFILIAR FEAIURE OF CIVIL llABlLliy l/J IQRI Uk)}

iTJS 1/JGoMS/STEMF iJlTH IHE CoHVEdlioMAl

\8JSM)lRJSJmjMTCEQR^

&ILS0ME.Ml£D.iM£I)-O-ti±G-^

THE. DMlTED SlATKS SUPREME GoURT IS THE

Jj/J^/ElTttELiMW^j^-^

l!SL_£E&Oi£eDu

I#£_ZJ/^j[EO^J^^^

IQoMGRESS SHALL. SPAKE MO LAlJ AMltiGlhJG FREE

SPEECH. THE ,<T7/97E OF TEXAS AMD THE LEGISLATE

SRAJJrH HAS JTIADE ALAO) AAR1DGIMG /A/ ^IGifT 16

EREE^SMeOL^

-J&iCERELy JftJE
#### Salah GOUDA, Petitioner, v. BLUE GOOSE GROWERS, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Respondent.

No. 77-2737.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 16, 1978.

Raymond E. Ford, Fort Pierce, for petitioner.

J. Stephen Tierney, III, of Neill, Griffin, Jeffries & Lloyd, Chartered, Fort Pierce, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of certiorari DENIED.

ANSTEAD, DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.2



                  CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       ----------------------------------
                               TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
                               -------------------
                             (Thousands of Dollars)


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                  JUNE       DECEMBER
                                                                  2001         2000
                                                               ----------   ----------
<S>                                                            <C>          <C>
EARNINGS
          Net Income                                           $  609,016   $  583,715
          Income Tax                                              351,430      289,926
                                                               ----------   ----------

                      Total Earnings Before Income Tax            960,446      873,641

FIXED CHARGES*                                                    405,171      392,347
                                                               ----------   ----------
                      Total Earnings Before Income Tax
                         and Fixed Charges                     $1,365,617   $1,265,988
                                                               ==========   ==========



          * Fixed Charges

          Interest on Long-Term Debt                           $  339,697   $  318,842
          Amortization of Debt Discount, Premium and Expense       12,324       12,584
          Interest on Component of Rentals                         17,708       17,697
          Other Interest                                           35,442       43,224
                                                               ----------   ----------

                      Total Fixed Charges                      $  405,171   $  392,347
                                                               ==========   ==========



          Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                         3.37         3.23
</Table>
Exhibit 9

{00763239}

ALASKA IRONWORKERS PENSION PLAN

LIST OF CONTRIBUTING EMPLOYERS

• Alaska Specialized Constructors, LLC

• ATEC Industries Ltd.

• Azco Inc.

• Dawson Construction Company

• Fisher Construction Group, Inc.

• Garco Construction

• Griffard Steel

• Guy Nielson Company

• Harder Mechanical Contractors

• Haskell Corporation

• Haskell-Davis JV

• Henricksen Construction Inc.

• Iron, Inc.

• J.H. Kelly

• National Steel Erectors Corporation

• Northern Reinforcing Placers, Inc.

• Northern Services

• North Pacific Erectors

• Northwest Steelworks, LLC

• Omega Riggers & Erectors

• Price Gregory International Inc.

• PSF Industries Inc.

• R2M2 Rebar & Stressing

• RPC, Inc.

• Roger Hickel Contracting Inc.

• Sampson Steel Company

• Sowles Company

• S.R. Bales Construction

• Swanson Steel Erectors, Inc.

• Universal Welding

• Whalen Construction

AIPT 137
#### William Lou TYLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1370.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 23, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James McCauley, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2006

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 6/29 7/3 7/6 12.00 18.00 16.00 44.00 2.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 7/6 7/10 7/13 15.00 18.00 16.00 38.00 11.00

7/13 7/17 7/20 15.00 18.00 16.00 39.00 10.00

7/20 7/24 7/27 15.00 18.00 16.00 41.00 8.00

7/27 7/31 8/3 15.00 18.00 16.00 44.00 5.00

8/3 8/7 8/10 15.00 18.00 16.00 47.00 2.00

8/10 8/14 8/17 15.00 18.00 16.00 48.00 1.00

8/17 8/21 8/24 15.00 18.00 16.00 50.00 -1.00

8/24 8/28 8/31 15.00 18.00 16.00 52.00 -3.00

8/31 9/5 9/7 15.00 17.00 15.00 52.00 -5.00

9/7 9/11 9/14 15.00 17.00 15.00 52.00 -5.00

9/14 9/18 9/21 8.00 17.00 15.00 50.00 -10.00

9/21 9/25 9/28 8.00 17.00 15.00 48.00 -8.00

612.00 605.00 7.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

14-DAY BILL 8/29 8/31 9/1 22.00 22.00 0.00

Matures 9/15

8-DAY BILL 9/5 9/6 9/7 15.00 15.00 0.00

Matures 9/15

0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-Year TIPS 7/10 7/13 7/17 10.00 1.00 17.25 -7.25

20-Year TIPS (R) 7/20 7/25 7/31 8.00 2.00

2-Year Note 7/24 7/26 7/31 23.00 1.00

5-Year Note 7/24 7/27 7/31 15.00 22.55 23.45

3-Year Note 8/2 8/7 8/15 22.00 1.00

10-Year Note 8/2 8/9 8/15 14.00 1.00

30-Year Bond (R) 8/2 8/10 8/15 14.00 22.57 27.43

2-Year Note 8/24 8/28 8/31 24.00 1.00

5-year Note 8/24 8/29 8/31 15.00 23.82 15.18

10-Year Note (R) 9/5 9/7 9/15 9.00 9.00

2-Year Note 9/25 9/27 10/2 24.00

5-year Note 9/25 9/28 10/2 16.00 1.00 23.77 16.23

194.00 109.95 84.04

Estimates are italicized

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 91.04

R = Reopening
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2284 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that gain or loss 

on the sale or exchange of certain coins or bullion is exempt from recognition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2021 

Mr. MOONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that gain or loss on the sale or exchange of certain 

coins or bullion is exempt from recognition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Monetary Metals Tax 

5 Neutrality Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM RECOGNITION OF GAIN OR LOSS 

7 FROM SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter O of chapter 1 of the 

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting 

10 after part IV the following new part: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2284 IH

1 ‘‘PART V—SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION 

‘‘Sec. 1071. Sale of certain coins or bullion. 

2 ‘‘SEC. 1071. SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION. 

3 ‘‘No gain or loss shall be recognized on the sale or 

4 exchange of— 

5 ‘‘(1) gold, silver, platinum, or palladium coins 

6 minted and issued by the Secretary at any time, or 

7 ‘‘(2) refined gold or silver bullion, coins, bars, 

8 rounds, or ingots which are valued primarily based 

9 on their metal content and not their form.’’. 

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of parts for 

11 subchapter O of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by 

12 inserting after the item relating to part IV the following 

13 new item: 

‘‘PART V—SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to sales or exchanges after Decem16 ber 31, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
256 La. 790

#### NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEWARK (First National State Bank of New Jersey) v. Nancy Riggs BARKER, wife of/and David H. Barker.

No. 50682.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1970.

In re: First National State Bank of New Jersey applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Lafourche.

Writ refused. The result is correct. As we construe the decision, it holds that a preliminary injunction without bond is proper pending a further hearing and final determination of the right to a permanent injunction based on the allegations of the petition.
#### Robert V. TAMPLAIN v. COLLINSWOOD POULTRY COMPANY et al.

No. 53835.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Robert V. Tamplain applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. John the Baptist. 279 So.2d 277.

Not considered. Not timely filed.
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 

[Specimen NextGen Healthcare, Inc. Common Stock Certificate] 
  

			
	NUMBER	  	SHARES

 NEXTGEN HEALTHCARE, INC. 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

This Certifies that
                                     is the registered holder
of
                                         
    Shares of the Common Stock of NextGen Healthcare, Inc., par value $0.01 per share, transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed. 
 In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be
hereunto affixed 
  

			
	     this day
	  	of A.D. 20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                        46
<INVENTORY>                                      3,650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,425
<PP&E>                                           3,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,216
<BONDS>                                            168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           705
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,496
<SALES>                                          9,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,645
<CGS>                                            4,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,532
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    76
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,614
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,614
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



                             COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)


<Table>
<Caption>
                                              Three Months Ended
                                                   March 31,                               Year Ended December 31,
                                            ----------------------    ------------------------------------------------------------
                                               2002         2001         2001        2000         1999         1998        1997
                                            ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------

<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
Interest Expense                            $  16,900    $  25,100    $  84,700    $ 100,300    $  55,200    $ 101,900   $  90,400

Capitalized Interest                               --          375        1,462        3,946           --           --          --

Estimated Interest Portion of
    Rent Expense                                3,750        4,574       13,369       15,614       13,948       12,352      10,864
                                            ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------

Fixed Charges                               $  20,650    $  30,049    $  99,531    $ 119,860    $  69,148    $ 114,252   $ 101,264
                                            =========    =========    =========    =========    =========    =========   =========

Income From Continuing
    Operations Before Income Taxes          $  71,500    $  86,800    $ 316,400    $ 549,900    $ 518,600    $ 523,600   $ 483,200

Add:  Fixed Charges                            20,650       29,674       98,069      115,914       69,148      114,252     101,264

Less: Equity in (Earnings)/Losses
      of Less Than 50% Owned
      Companies                                  (346)        (702)      (2,922)      (3,367)      (1,069)         595        (320)
                                            ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------

Earnings Before Fixed Charges               $  91,804    $ 115,772    $ 411,547    $ 662,447    $ 586,679    $ 638,447   $ 584,144
                                            =========    =========    =========    =========    =========    =========   =========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges               4.4x         3.9x         4.1x         5.5x         8.5x         5.6x        5.8x
</Table>
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the“Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: May 10, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report on Form 10-K ofAutovative Products, Inc.;for the Year ended December 31, 2011,
I, David Funderburk, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ David Funderburk       
|David Funderburk           
|Principal Financial Officer
|April 11, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 1 9

- 0320

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ETTA KOEHLER DOUBEK

,
Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including April 24, 2020 , within which to prepare, file,

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 16 2020

03/16/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0320
# K · l ·· ·

· RI\ ·-·c K
__ 

# ,..r S

_ v

_ Vfij 9 

# F l
.. -

L
. _ ·

: L

:- . · E

-, · :-'

_ . __ ·_ .·_.

_

. · !'
. "· · - • . , .. t
- '4**•· "** **~.., ...,.,** **·· """'** **"-= -~,-** **~..v. ?-~** **~** ..,. u .,..,.. . . .. . . .**·: '<>»-<.** **·"'" "'""** **'- ""** **-'< --**  .**.,.~..,. ..,_** **...,......., .,** **<~<_ .:)<}** **""'" ·"'** **-..~ ·..-** **.--=: <Y.<** **""'! .·:;;** **..-~:::..:Y:?;t.."W '-'** **-"" ':'··** **_,,_,.. ..__** **,_ .,h,·~**  ..• . .,..·>'**-~ .-**  •• ..,._,._ _ ._ ••••• • • ·
' t' > . · , !

·- ··· - ··· · ···**-- ··** **·· -:-** **;, ...,.,**  - , · , ! · Administration 660.62 7 .1 225 • Hum a n R es ource s 660
. 627.1458 

# · ·. '- ' : > · C

' ':" :: :**~** 

## .' Econo mic & Commu n it y D e v e lopment 660.627
. 1 224

.... ; 7 ' !
. j

.. :- : . . ·

:. '• · . I

. l



### June 27, 2012

Dennis DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service & 

### Domestic Analysis Department of Transportation, Room 6401 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. UeVany: The Kirksville City Council, at their regular meeting of June 27, 2012 , voted to opt out of the 15-seat requirement that is currently under the essential air service guidelines. The City Council is recommending that Cape Air continue services at the Kirksville Regional Airport with nine-seat service. We greatly appreciate your support and assistance. Sincerely,

# ~f.OL~ Richard 

### L. Detweiler Mayor

. . : '

201 S. Frankli n • Kirk sville, Missouri 6350 1 Toll Fr ee : 888 .299
. 1223 • F ax: 660.665.0940 • www.kirk svillecity.co m