alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
1 After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 2 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
JOHN H. MARRS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. SHON P. BOLES; CURTIS L. ODLE,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 98-3211 (D.C. No. 96-CV-1079-MLB)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRORBY , EBEL , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
John H. Marrs appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on his civil rights claim of arrest with out probable cause, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 Our jurisdiction over this appeal arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.-2-

The district court concluded that defendants were enti tled to summary judgment because, on the record before it, probable cause for the arrest existed as a matter of law and because defendants were enti tled to qualified immunity. On appeal, Mr. Marrs contends that his ultimate acq uittal of the charges demonstrates a lack of probable cause and that defe ndants acted unreasonably under the circumstances. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Kaul v. Stephan , 83 F.3d 1208, 1212 (10th Cir. 1996). After careful review of the record on appeal togeth er with the applicable law and the parties’ briefs on appeal, we conclude that the district court correctly decided this case. Therefore, for substantially th e same reasons contained in the district court’s Memorandum and Order dated July 15 , 1998, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2066 

To provide for the confidentiality of information submitted in requests for 

deferred action under the deferred action for childhood arrivals program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mrs. TORRES of California (for herself, Ms. ESCOBAR, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. 

ESPAILLAT, Ms. NORTON, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. 

VARGAS, Ms. TITUS, Ms. OMAR, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. GALLEGO, and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the confidentiality of information submitted 

in requests for deferred action under the deferred action 

for childhood arrivals program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect DREAMer 

5 Confidentiality Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2066 IH

1 (1) DACA PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘DACA pro2 gram’’ means the deferred action for childhood ar3 rivals program described in the memorandum of the 

4 Department of Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Exer5 cising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Indi6 viduals Who Came to the United States as Chil7 dren’’ issued on June 15, 2012. 

8 (2) INDIVIDUAL APPLICATION INFORMATION.— 

9 The term ‘‘individual application information’’ 

10 means any information, including personally identifi11 able information, submitted to the Secretary after 

12 June 15, 2012, as part of a request for consider13 ation or reconsideration for the DACA program. 

14 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

15 the Secretary of Homeland Security. 

16 SEC. 3. CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED 

17 FOR DACA PROGRAM. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall protect indi19 vidual application information from disclosure to U.S. Im20 migration and Customs Enforcement or U.S. Customs and 

21 Border Protection for any purpose other than the imple22 mentation of the DACA program. 

23 (b) REFERRALS PROHIBITED.—The Secretary may 

24 not refer to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 

25 U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Department of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2066 IH

1 Justice, or any other law enforcement agency any indi2 vidual the case of whom has been deferred pursuant to 

3 the DACA program. 

4 (c) LIMITED EXCEPTION.—Individual application in5 formation may be shared with national security and law 

6 enforcement agencies— 

7 (1) to identify or prevent fraudulent claims; 

8 (2) for particularized national security purposes 

9 relating to an individual application; and 

10 (3) for the investigation or prosecution of any 

11 felony not related to immigration status. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard N. Feist III,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


October 11, 2007


/s/ Howard N. Feist III
------------------------
Howard N. Feist III
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Ossen Innovation Co., Ltd. (the "Registrant") on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 25, 2013

| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| |
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 20

- 0341 Filed December 16, 2020

JOHN H. WHITE , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,
vs. CITY OF DUBUQUE BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS , Defendant

- Appell ee

.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Monica Zrinyi Wittig , Judge.

Property owner appeals a remand order issued in response to his petition for writ of certiorari. AFFI RMED.

Stuart G. Hoover , East Dubuque, Illinois , for appellant. Maureen Quann , Assistant City Attorney, Dubuque , for appellee.

Considered by Doyle, P.J. , and Mullins and Greer, JJ.2

MULLINS , Judge

. John White appeals the remand of the certiorari proceeding he initiated against the City of Dubuque Building Code Board of Appeals (Board) on the basis that the Board failed to follow its own rules and procedures and violated White’s due process rights. The remand was for the purpose of the Board proce eding in compliance with the city code. We affirm for the reasons stated in our contemporaneously filed decision in Kopzyck v. City of Dubuque Building Code Board of Appeals , No. 20

- 0340, 2020 WL _______ , at *__ (Iowa Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2020) (“ It is the r ule that certiorari proceedings may be remanded where the inferior tribunal has not proceeded according to law and the mistake may be corrected upon a further hearing. ” (quoting Watson v. Charlton , 50 N.W.2d 605, 611 ( Iowa 1951) ))

. AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, December 8, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: November 28, 1997
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-31769 Filed 11-28-97; 4:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Edward SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 22, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
256 La. 782

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Charles PATOUT et al., and Vermilion Development Company, Inc.

No. 50617.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1970.

In re: Charles A. Patout and Lawrence C. Richard, and Vermilion Development Company, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 236 So.2d 40; 236 So.2d 53.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, James E. Hausman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CTCommunications, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CT Communications,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
     (b) [Intentionally omitted]
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: April 27, 2005         By: /s/ James E. Hausman          James E. Hausman     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63922-63923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-483), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: December 9, 1997.
    Time of Meeting: 0830-1630.
    Place: Boeing Helicopter Factory, Mesa, AZ.

[[Page 63923]]

    Agenda: The Army Science Board's (ASB) Issue Group Study on 
``Army Avionics Modernization Methodologies'' will meet for 
discussions on the Boeing avionics modernization methodologies, Army 
avionics science and technology programs, and open systems 
architecture. This meeting will be open to the public. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the 
committee. For further information, please contact our office at 
(703) 695-0781.
Wayne Joyner,
Program Support Specialist, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 97-31630 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 32.1

Tropicana Las Vegas Hotel and Casino, Inc.  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tropicana Las Vegas Hotel and Casino, Inc., (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alex Yemenidjian, Chief Executive Officer, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to my knowledge:



Dated:
February 22, 2011

/s/ ALEX YEMENIDJIAN Alex Yemenidjian Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Joshua Gold Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Benjamin Ward, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the periods  expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Benjamin Ward       |
|-------------------------|
| Benjamin Ward           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| July 22, 2011           |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

                                                                        

----
#### Deborah Kay MIXON, a minor, by Barbara A. Williams, her mother and next friend, and Barbara A. Williams, individually, Appellants, v. TOPO, INC., a corporation, Appellee.

No. J-356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 23, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 31, 1969.

Basford, Levy & Inman, and S. Perry Penland, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of an adverse final judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the defendant in an action arising from a collision between defendant’s truck and an automobile in which the plaintiff was a passenger.

The sole question raised by the appellants is whether the evidence given at the trial is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict for the defendant. Our review of the record, briefs and consideration of the arguments lead us to conclude that there was evidence given which was sufficient to support the jury’s finding that the defendant’s driver was not negligent.

While it is true that there was evidence introduced which would have supported a jury verdict for the plaintiff-appellant had it been believed by the jury, our scope of review does not permit us to substitute our judgment for that of the jury as to the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. Conflicts in the *739evidence can be resolved only by the jury in a negligence action such as this. Povia v. Melvin, 66 So.2d 494 (Fla.1953).

No error having been demonstrated by appellant, the judgment appealed must necessarily be affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J. and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 07, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 07, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0547. KIMBERLY GRESHAM v. ATLANTA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL SYSTEM et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2014242999
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63564-63565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Partnership Panel

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Partnership Panel, Partnership Agreements Section, to the 
National Council on the Arts will be held on January 24-14, 1998. The 
panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on January 12, from 9:00 
a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on January 13, and from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on 
January 14 in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20506. A portion of this meeting, from 2:30 
p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on January 14, will be open to the public for a 
policy discussion of guidelines, planning, field needs and trends, and 
Leadership Initiatives.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. 
on January 12, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on January 13, and from 9:00 
a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on January 14, are for the purpose of Panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on

[[Page 63565]]

applications for financial assistance under the National Foundation on 
the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including 
information given in confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of March 31, 1997, 
these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection 
(c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Accessibility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call (202) 682-5691.

    Dated: November 24, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-31449 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
257 La. 266

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Francis Aubrey CLIFTON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 51038.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 5, 1971.

In re: Francis Aubrey Clifton applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied: The showing made does not entitle relator for the relief sought either under our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

GLADNEY, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

TATE, J.,

is of the opinion that North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), requires that the petitioner be allowed credit for his period of incarceration prior to the re-sentencing; therefore, hearing on the writ should be granted.
# Sheet1

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&8*BASED ON 2011-2015 ACS AND REFLECTS 2020 MSA/MD DELINEATIONS ADOPTED BY FFIEC CENSUS. **REFER TO APPENDIX OF 2020 CENSUS FLAT FILE DOCUMENTATION FOR DETAILS ON METHODOLOGY.