alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
255 La. 289

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles Floyd YANDELL et al.

No. 50330.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 9, 1970.

The petition of relator in the above numbered and entitled cause having been duly considered,

IT IS ORDERED, that the order and ruling denying bail to relator issued by the Honorable Wallace A. Edwards, Judge of Division B of the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, St. Tammany Parish, dated December 16, 1969 be and the same is hereby set aside.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this matter be and the same is hereby remanded to the said Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, with instructions that the hearing on relator’s application for bail herein be reopened, granting unto the State’s Attorney opportunity to rebut the evidence adduced by relator at the original hearing held on November 18, 1969, after which the Honorable Wallace A. Edwards, Judge of said Court, shall, on the basis of the additional evidence adduced, determine relator’s entitlement to bail in the premises, failing in which relator shall be released on bail upon furnishing security in an amount to be determined by the Honorable Wallace A. Edwards in accordance with law.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.    /s/Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer    /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  November 6, 2009    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Ozzie BENNETT v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39405.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
. 

-\ 

,. 

._, I.’ i ;r- -A_ 

6;1:~ 

; SC. 

: 

lg.?&:. 

h”- n&c 

I 

1 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

.“*&I) G. IYAYN _ 

.mnsr ..““h. 

i 

. . 
i 

6'79 ' 
. , 680 

'4. A fkul io thm mu iboaroh haor- 

&or ofthmoqbr 

00Bd 

at of ?hy8Aeo.: ?hlr U$aly 

d.atlU rooeowa pro)oat,io buod aa a ooa- 

-0 tith 8ha 0, 8. Ot~ioo 01 Solratliio Rawrrch .. 

an4-2evolo~. It lo #uroly 8 ruo8ti proJ*ot 

d&h bu bow uudwtobwa by bw8dn Pull-tiao 

w w Ot thW 8t8ft @f thC DOpUtXWBt 

OS ng o lor nb a dwotm sll o t thmll r pun tbo, 

&OYO $&l? tog&m lBWu8lty dutieo, to thlo 

-+ :;. 

*Iii th a b a d8 o i th lhot o l ltwklun, I ëuhula lll~~~- 

lab to preoont the follwFag quaotioor 

"IO trio aaouet of aMpenoauon pole to full; 

tti* rMulty wabuo rho putioipate in t:1roo 

l pmol8lprogrou In Oh0 -r iodlo8tod l.knit.4 by the s%rmt pmagmph OS Subowotiula (a) 

of 8hm oonorwl kvavIoloM ottho Imlmalotnl 

Appre$brlatian Aot ior thm ounVat bloanlum?" 

..' 
681 . 

~ltsa . lM tr uo tb a 8l M l8r a oo &tthat l owol *l&t ba l ljr~t& b7 tbo lirit8tloao OS brrbmot5on (2) of tie miiazwraZ 

~ovio~o~' of thm Approprlatien dot; thlm submotion rtidrr 
682 - 


. - 

685 
,
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ronald Wayne SMITH (a.k.a. Steve Gillam).

No. 62292.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Ronald Wayne Smith, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. Evidentiary hearing ordered.
257 La. 279

#### Genevieve Wortman WILLIAMS v. Edward Leroy WILLIAMS, Jr.

No. 51044.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 5, 1971.

In re: Edward Leroy Williams, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 240 So.2d 795.

Writ refused. No error of law appears in the judgment.
Income Source Marginal Tax Rate

(%)

Wages 24.1

Interest2 26.7

Pension distributions 22.2

Dividend (non-qualified) 2 30.0

Dividends (qualified)2 19.4

Sole Proprietorship Income3 22.7

Sole Proprietorship Losses3 16.7

Farm Income4 22.0

Farm Losses 4 15.2

Active Partnership Income5 35.8

Active Partnership Losses5 15.3

Passive Partnership Income2 6 36.1

Passive Partnership Losses2 6 23.8

Active S-corporation Income7 35.9

Active S-corporation Losses7 11.9

Passive S-corporation Income2 8 37.7

Passive S-corporation Losses2 8 17.1

Rental Income2 9 26.8

Rental Losses2 9 17.4

Long-term Capital Gains2 21.3

Long-term Capital Losses2 0.4

Short-term Capital Gains2 32.2

Short-term Capital Losses2 1.3

U.S. Department of the Treasury August 18, 2015

 Office of Tax Analysis

Notes:

2. MTRs include the effect of the 3.8% net investment income tax.

6. Passive partnership income/loss as reported on part II of the form 1040, schedule E.

7. Active S corporation income/loss as reported on part II of the form 1040, schedule E.

8. Passive S corporation income/loss as reported on part II of the form 1040, schedule E.

9. Rental income as reported on part I of the form 1040, schedule E.

Marginal Income Tax Rates by Income Source1

1. Marginal tax rates (MTR) are computed using the Office of Tax Analysis' (OTA) Individual 

Tax Model (ITM). The ITM extrapolates the 2010 Statistics of Income (SOI) Individual and 

Sole Proprietorship (INSOLE) data to represent the 2016 tax filing population using the 

Administration's economic assumptions from the Fiscal Year 2016 Mid-Session Review. 

MTRs for each income type are only computed for tax returns with non-zero amounts of that 

type of income. A tax return's MTR for a specific income item is computed by adding (or 

subtracting) a small amount of income and computing the resulting tax change. The MTR is 

simply the change in tax divided by the change in income. The averages in the table are 

income weighted by the type of income relevant for the MTR, e.g., by dividend income for the 

MTR on dividends. Consequently, the MTRs in this table represent the tax effect of increasing 

each tax return's income (of the appropriate type) by a small percentage. The returns from 

businesses, including short- and long-term capital gains, can be either positive (income) or 

negative (losses). MTRs are calculated separately for tax returns with income and losses to 

allow income weighting as described above.

5. Active partnership income/loss as reported on part II of the form 1040, schedule E.

4. Farm income/loss as reported on the form 1040, schedule F.

3. Sole proprietorship income/loss as reported on the form 1040, schedule C.

(2015 Law at Estimated 2016 Income Levels)

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Tax Analysis

August 18, 2015
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Missouri

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Missouri over

$187 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

Central Bancshares of Kansas City, Inc. Kansas City CDFI $ 75,000,000 

Holy Rosary Credit Union Kansas City CDFI $ 1,000,000 

Ozarks Heritage Financial Group, Inc. Gainesville CDFI $ 99,000,000 

Stark Bancshares, Inc. Bolivar CDFI $ 12,041,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
### **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the "PeriodicReport ", I, William J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledgeand belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   Date: | November 9, 2004        |   | /s/  William J. Murphy |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|              | William J. Murphy       |
|              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

t0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148616

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148616

COA: 318187

Tuscola CC: 12

- 012608

- FH

BENJAMIN ALLEN SWITEK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Chrysler Financial
Auto Securitization Trust 2009-B (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on
my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report
in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ L.F. GuindiL.F. GuindiVice President and Treasurer of
Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC,
as servicer
(senior officer in charge of servicing
function)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135179 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135179 

 COA: 270917 

Ingham CC: 05-000934-FH

ROBERT HEZEKIAH PRESCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 22, 2008 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62576-62577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30748]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-171-011]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice Of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

November 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 13, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, tariff sheets to be effective November 1, 1997.
    ANR states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the

[[Page 62577]]

Commission's October 29, 1997 letter order. That order addressed the 
incorporation of certain Gas Industry Standard Board business practices 
into ANR's tariff.
    ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protect this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commissions Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30748 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00090

- CR

Nicholas Wayne Doss v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Willacy County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- CR

- 0034

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by
this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Au gust 26 , 2021
Sanitized

ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

SMILES : [ ]

CHEM : [ ]

CAS Num: [ ]

ChemID1: 

MOL FOR: [ ]

MOL WT : [ ]

Log Kow: 2.665 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Log Kow: (User Entered)

Log Kow: (PhysProp DB exp value - for comparison only)

Melt Pt: (User Entered for Wat Sol estimate)

Melt Pt: (deg C, PhysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol estimate)

Wat Sol: 61 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

Wat Sol: (User Entered)

Wat Sol: (PhysProp DB exp value)

--------------------------------------

Values used to Generate ECOSAR Profile

--------------------------------------

Log Kow: 2.665 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Wat Sol: 61 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

------------------------------------------------

Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

------------------------------------------------

 No Data Available

--------------------------------------

ECOSAR v1.1 Class-specific Estimations

--------------------------------------

Neutral Organics

 Predicted

ECOSAR Class Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm)

========================= ============ ============= ============ ==========

Neutral Organics : Fish 96-hr LC50 34.679

Neutral Organics : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 20.937

Neutral Organics : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 20.103

Neutral Organics : Fish ChV 3.644

Neutral Organics : Daphnid ChV 2.422

Neutral Organics : Green Algae ChV 6.036

Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) 96-hr LC50 43.832
Neutral Organics : Mysid 96-hr LC50 20.762

Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) ChV 7.140

Neutral Organics : Mysid (SW) ChV 1.474

Neutral Organics : Earthworm 14-day LC50 247.661 *

Note: * = asterisk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough to measure this predicted effect. If 

the effect level exceeds the water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES) are reported.

------------------------------

Class Specific LogKow Cut-Offs

------------------------------

If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut-offs presented below, then no 

effects at saturation are expected for those endpoints.

Neutral Organics:

----------------

Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fish 96-hr LC50; Daphnid LC50, Mysid LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.0 (Earthworm LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50)

Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)
**Exhibit 32.1.2**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the“Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: August 7, 2008
#### Ben LOPEZ and Maria Rosa Gonzalez, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42656.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 29, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 264 So.2d 69.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
1 2023 Strategic Plan Update

Department of the Treasury Strategic Plan 2022–2026

2023 Strategic Plan Update

Annual Update to the Strategic Plan 

Each year following our Strategic Objective Annual Review (SOAR), we commit to providing an annual update to the 

strategic plan to highlight any shifts in strategies or objectives resulting from our analysis of outcomes, success criteria, 

and other evidence. 

For 2023, we identified 12 updates to our Strategic Plan. This update sheet details these changes and provides our rationale for why they were made.

1. We updated language in the Understanding the Unique Status of Tribal Governments section. 

2. We updated Treasury Leads and Supports in the Strategic Plan Crosswalk.

3. We updated Strategic Objective 1.1 Tax Administration and Policy.

4. We updated Strategic Objective 1.3 Economically Resilient Communities.

5. We updated Measures and Indicators of Success for Strategy 1.1.C in Strategic Objective 1.4 Resilient Housing 

Market.

6. We updated Measures and Indicators of Success for Strategy 3.3.C in Strategic Objective 3.3 Financial Innovation.

7. We updated Strategic Objective 4.1 Global Climate Commitment and Leadership.

8. We updated Strategic Objective 4.2 Climate Incentives and Investment.

9. We added to the Learning Agenda in Strategic Objective 4.3 Climate-Related 

Financial Risks.

10. We updated Strategic Objective 5.2 Future Work Routines.

11. We sunset Strategy 5.4.A and its Measures and Indicators of Success in Strategic Objective 5.4 Customer 

Experience Practices.

12. We added and removed programs in the Treasury Critical Programs and Projects for 

FY 2022 – 2026 Strategic Plan section.

Understanding the Unique Status of Tribal Governments 

Strategic Plan Crosswalk

Strategic Objective 1.1 Tax Administration and Policy

Strategic Objective 1.3 Economically Resilient Communities

Strategic Objective 1.4 Resilient Housing Market

Strategic Objective 3.3 Financial Innovation 

Strategic Objective 4.1 Global Climate Commitment and Leadership 

Strategic Objective 4.2 Climate Incentives and Investment

Strategic Objective 4.3 Climate-Related Financial Risks

Strategic Objective 5.2 Future Work Routines

Strategic Objective 5.4 Customer Experience Practices 

Treasury Critical Programs and Projects for FY 2022 – 2026 Strategic Plan

Interactive Controls for 2023 Updates

 | Opens the pop-up that shows the original version

 | Closes the pop-up that shows the original version
#### Ben F. O’NEAL and Amelia B. O’Neal, his wife, Appellants, v. POLK COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee, Eva H. Nowlen et al., Intervenors.

No. 72-373.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-924-1430-01; MTM 84895]


Opening of Lands; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Parcels of land which were segregated for Phase II of exchange 
MTM 84895 are no longer under consideration for exchange. This order 
terminates the exchange segregation and opens the following described 
lands to the public land laws and mining laws, subject to other 
segregations of record:

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 3 N., R. 26 E.,
    Sec. 32, S\1/2\SE\1/4\.
T. 5 N., R. 28 E.,
    Sec. 28, NE\1/4\ and NE\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 34, NE\1/4\NE\1/4\.
T. 6 N., R. 28 E.,
    Sec. 34, NE\1/4\NE\1/4\.
T. 4 N., R. 31 E.,
    Sec. 24, NE\1/4\NE\1/4\.
T. 6 N., R. 31 E.,
    Sec. 34, N\1/2\NE\1/4\ and W\1/2\SE\1/4\.
T. 4 N., R. 32 E.,
    Sec. 18, lot 3 and NE\1/4\SW\1/4\.

    Containing 635.46 acres in Yellowstone County.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 3, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Ward, BLM Montana State Office, 
P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107, (406) 255-2949.

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
James Binando,
Chief, Branch of Land Resources, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 97-31723 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P