alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cordelia BROTHERS v. Pervie BROTHERS, Jr.

Civ. 1218.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 9, 1977.

*925George H. Howell, Prattville, for appellant.

No brief for appellee.

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit for divorce with alimony and division of property. Divorce with alimony and sale and division of jointly-owned realty was granted to her. She appeals. We affirm.

Two issues are presented by the appeal. It is first charged that the trial court erroneously prevented plaintiff from presenting evidence of property purchased during the marriage and the appreciated value of the property.

We have looked to that part of the transcript wherein plaintiff charges erroneous ruling of the trial court. We find a colloquy between counsel and the court concerning presentation of evidence relating to the purchase price of property and sums paid for improvements. The court suggested that more evidence on the subject might be “whipping the dog,” as it was going to be sold and the proceeds divided. Counsel agreed that further testimony was unnecessary under such circumstances and proceeded to other testimony without any offer of proof, stated objection or a ruling by the court.

It is clear from what we have related, no error may be contended on appeal. Ordinarily, in the absence of an objection to a ruling of the court and a statement of grounds of objection, there is no ground for appeal. Rule 46, ARCP. Though there is no longer necessity for saving error after an adverse ruling by recording a formal exception to the ruling, it remains necessary to enter an objection and state grounds therefor. We find neither a ruling nor objection thereto in the record.

The remaining issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in not awarding plaintiff more of the property accumulated by the parties during the marriage.

Plaintiff recognizes that the division of property in a divorce action is a matter for the exercise of the discretion of the trial court, subject to review on appeal only for gross abuse. *Dickson v. Dickson,*57 Ala.App. 732, 331 So.2d 740 (1976). We have reviewed the record and find absent therefrom any evidence as to present value of either the real estate and its improvements or of various items of personal property. The evidence as to purchase price in past years is of no assistance to our review. In view of the state of the record this court cannot find the trial court has abused its discretion.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tropicana Entertainment Inc. (the "Company") for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott C. Butera, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lance J.
Millage, as Senior Vice President, Finance of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



Date:
March 31, 2010

/s/ SCOTT C. BUTERA Scott C. Butera Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ LANCE J. MILLAGE Lance J. Millage Senior Vice President, Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tropicana Entertainment Inc. and will be retained by Tropicana
Entertainment Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20226

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIE LEE RANDEL, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-156-ALL

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Willie

Lee Randel, Jr., in his appeal of the order revoking his term of

supervised release has filed a motion and a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Randel has not

filed a response to his counsel’s motion.

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). Article III, § 2 of the Constitution limits federal

court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. See
No. 05-20226

-2-

Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). The case-or-controversy

requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury

other than the now-ended incarceration or parole -- some

‘collateral consequence’ of the conviction -- must exist if the

suit is to be maintained.” Id.

Randel has served the sentence that was imposed upon the

revocation of his supervised release. The order revoking

Randel’s term of supervised release imposed no further term of

supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy

for this court to address, and the appeal is dismissed as moot. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied as unnecessary. 

MOTION DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; APPEAL DISMISSED.
256 La. 362

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Donald BALES v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50608.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1970.

In re: Donald Bales applying- for writ of habeas corpus.

Application not considered. See Rule XII of this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Journal of Radiology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period  ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Aaron Shrira, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aaron Shrira and will be retained by Journal of Radiology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 Dated: September 26, 2011

 

By: /s/ Aaron Shrira

Aaron Shrira 

President

(Principal Executive Officer)

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

 

JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Journal of Radiology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the period  ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Elana Berman-Shrira, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elana Berman-Shrira and will be retained by Journal of Radiology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

Dated: September 26, 2011

By: /s/ Elana Berman-Shrira

Elana Berman-Shrira 

Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

**HonOrrblQ 080.**  **A. shspprd**  **Comptrel ler**  **of Rtbllc**  **Aceauw5t.n**

**nsar Yr.**  **Sheppard:**

**palid under**  **the** 

### protldana **Wstutest uMeh**  **prorlden**

**the St4** **te Borrd**  **af 2saadnerr.**  

### Gait3 ArtSale **clpsa¶ffoeYly pro**  **rfdaa that**  **‘ no**  **~parson shall**  **rcoaelre the**  

### rtmotmemtatian **of the**  **County** 

### 6ttperdntentlemt **rl the&**  **fjtst dopOd**  **t*aC;** **wl tb**  **the %Ud?**  

### ?Tupewlntemdent

themm of M-00 esan exasfnaflbnfeatand t~hs **roaorwendatfan given**  **by the**  **Cotmty** 

### Superintendent **da11 show**  **the** mwel*t ei ua*d fee.*

**~Sald mtatute**  **al80 requires**  **the Cowty**  **Brrperintsadent rhon**  **he senda**  **the papeia**  **tn the**  Wtsttt **Buperintandent to**  semd

### Ae

### weundermtmd, **the request**  **here .wde**  

### in **am to** 

**wbetber** 

### the **@.OO tbnt**  **-8 sent**  **to the**  ***tata Superlntm&mt**  **;sq b**  **refunUeU ta**  **the 0ppYiaan**  **t, who**  **lue gena**  **to morto**  **4UW, and**  **rho ,for**  **mid re8wn**  does **not nom** 

### desire**a teaaber** **’ s**  

## eertitiort+.
Federal Loan Programs and Tax-Exempt 

Bond Options for Indian Country

Elaine Buckberg

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Policy Coordination

Point of Contact for Tribal Consultation

U.S. Treasury Department

Tribal.Consult@treasury.gov

U . S . DEPARTMENT O F THE TREASURY

OFFICE O F ECONOMIC POLICY
http://www.indianaffairs.gov/cs/groups/xieed/d

ocuments/document/idc-022680.pdf

Federal Loan Programs for Economic 

and Community Development 

throughout Indian Country and Alaska
USDA Infrastructure Programs

• Water and Waste Disposal

– Tribes and non-profit corporations

– Supports development of water and waste disposal 

infrastructure

– Grants, direct loans, and loan guarantees

– Up to 75% of project cost

Details: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/UWPdispdirectloansgrants.htm

State contacts: 

http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_Energy_coordinatorList.html
USDA Infrastructure Programs

• Rural Energy for America Program (REAP)

– Rural small businesses and farmers

– Renewable energy systems and energy efficiency 

improvements

– Loan guarantees up to $25,000,000

– Grants to $500,000

Details: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_ReapResEei.html

State contacts: 

http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP_Energy_coordinatorList.html
Economic and Community Development

• 7 programs

– $100,000 up to $125,000,000

– Loan terms up to 40 years

Available to # of Programs

Tribes 4

Businesses 3

Individuals 1

Non-profits 5
Housing Programs

• 10 programs

– $80,000 up to $10,000,000

– Loan terms up to 30 years

Available to # of Programs

Tribes 3

Businesses 2

Individuals 9

Non-profits 2
Small Business Programs

• 9 programs

– $50,000 up to $5,500,000

– Loan terms up to 25 years

Available to # of Programs

Tribes 3

Businesses 7

Individuals 1

Non-profits 4
CDFI Bond Guarantee Program

• Provides long term capital (up to 30 years) to 

certified CDFIs

• Capital provided at below market rates

• Flexibility in collateral requirements

• Tribes can collaborate with CDFIs as secondary 

borrowers from CDFIs
Tax-Favored Bond Issuance Programs

• Tribal Economic Development Bonds

– Finance economic development programs

– Up to $297 million per tribe

• New Clean Renewable Energy Bonds

– Finance renewable energy projects

– Treasury and IRS are working on guidance on reallocation of unused volume that reverted to IRS

• Tax Exempt Bonds
http://www.irs.gov/Tax-Exempt-Bonds

Contact: Timothy Jones or Zoran Stojanovic at 202-622-3980.
General inquiries about Treasury policies 

affecting tribes:

Tribal.Consult@treasury.gov
Exhibit 32.1









Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hypersolar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy Young, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  September 9, 2010





By:
/s/ Timothy YoungChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)











This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Ronaldo Reyes       | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 1761 East St. Andrew Place           | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Santa Ana, CA  92705                 | Wilmington,DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Darnella Tinnel-Crawford       | Ally Bank |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700               | Attn:  Martha Tate |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 200 West Civic Center Drive |
|                                            | Sandy, UT 84070 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Michael W. ODonnell, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Columbia Energy Group on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date:  May 9, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Michael W. ODonnellMichael W. ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Ronald PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-860.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 27, 1971.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Norman J. Kapner, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James M. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record, read the briefs, and find that appellant has failed to demonstrate harmful, reversible error.

Affirmed.

REED, J., and McCAIN, DAVID L., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judges, concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE ARANDA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2791

[January 23, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Sherri Collins, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 2013CF004688AXXXWB.

Christopher A. Haddad of the Law Office of Christopher A. Haddad, 

P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of GLOBAL CONDIMENTS, INC. on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 /s/ CHARLES C. HERLOCHER

Charles C. Herlocher CEO

Dated:
June 26, 2013



/s/ CHARLES C. HERLOCHER

Charles C. Herlocher

CFO

Dated:
June 26, 2013
  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### James Boyce DOLLAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-367.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2195 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2195

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the scope of 
procedural rights of members of the uniformed services with respect to 
   their employment and reemployment rights, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

  Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Mr. Takano, Mr. Reschenthaler, and Mr. 
   Golden) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the scope of 
procedural rights of members of the uniformed services with respect to 
   their employment and reemployment rights, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting the Employment Rights of 
Servicemembers Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATIONS REGARDING SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT 
              RIGHTS OF MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    (a) Clarification Regarding Definition of Rights and Benefits.--
Section 4303(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' before ``The term''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(B) Any procedural protections or provisions set forth in 
        this chapter shall also be considered a right or benefit 
        subject to the protection of this chapter.''.
    (b) Clarification Regarding Relation to Other Law and Plans for 
Agreements.--Section 4302 of such title is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(c)(1) Pursuant to this section and the procedural rights 
afforded by subchapter III of this chapter, any agreement to arbitrate 
a claim under this chapter is unenforceable, unless all parties consent 
to arbitration after a complaint on the specific claim has been filed 
in court or with the Merit Systems Protection Board and all parties 
knowingly and voluntarily consent to have that particular claim 
subjected to arbitration.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, consent shall not be 
considered voluntary when a person is required to agree to arbitrate an 
action, complaint, or claim alleging a violation of this chapter as a 
condition of future or continued employment, advancement in employment, 
or receipt of any right or benefit of employment.''.
                                 <all>
```