alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-50774

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHOYCE TOLLIVER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-109-1

Before OWEN, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Choyce Tolliver has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Tolliver has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 7, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-50774 Document: 00514946807 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2019
No. 18-50774

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-50774 Document: 00514946807 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     UT


<LEGEND>                      The schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from Consolidated
                              Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Statement of
                              Cash Flows for Consolidated
                              Edison Company of New York, Inc. and is
                              qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000023632
<NAME> Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                               <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                      Sep-30-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                      Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>         10,489,529

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>       301,230

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>            1,269,148

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>          592,291

<OTHER-ASSETS>                    756,897

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    13,409,095

<COMMON>                          545,106

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>         901,081


<RETAINED-EARNINGS>               3,876,338

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>    4,533,762

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             37,050

<PREFERRED>                       212,563

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>              4,043,251

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                   0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>            0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>       0

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>     275,000

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>            0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>       35,137

<LEASES-CURRENT>                  2,634

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>    4,269,698

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>     13,409,095

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>         5,283,899

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>              333,962

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        4,132,716

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        4,466,678

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>           817,221

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                4,217

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>    821,438

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>          240,506

<NET-INCOME>                      580,932

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>       10,194

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>     570,738

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>          1,211,930

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>         229,131

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>            1,611,070

<EPS-BASIC>                        0

<EPS-DILUTED>                        0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**Amendment No. 3**

 

**To**

 

**THE CONSOLIDATEDEDISON, INC.**

 

**STOCK PURCHASE PLAN**

 

**Effective January 1, 2005**

**CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.**

 

Pursuant to resolutions adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. duly called and held on July14, 2004, and to the authority granted the undersigned pursuant to Article 11 (a) and (b) of the Consolidated Edison, Inc., Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”), the undersigned hereby amends the Plan as set forth below, effective as of January 1,2005: 

 
1.APPENDIX B – EMPLOYER AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS is amended as follows: 
 

Paragraph (d) is amended by adding the following sentence at the end of the paragraph as follows: “Effective January 1,2005, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. has determined to make contributions on behalf of its Employees who are members of Local Union No. 503 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO.” 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this 25th day of October,2004. 

 

/s/    CLAUDETRAHAN        
Claude Trahan
Vice President – Human Resources

ConsolidatedEdison Company of

New York, Inc.
# HSA Tables
#### The STATE of Florida ex rel. Artemio CRESPO et al., Relators, v. The Honorable Bill G. CHAPPELL, Judge of the Circuit Court in and for Monroe County, Florida, Criminal Division, Respondent.

No. 73-674.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
# Recipients
256 La. 1145

#### RIVERLAND HARDWOOD COMPANY, Inc. v. CRAFTSMAN HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY.

No. 50965.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 25, 1970.

In re: Riverland Hardwood Company, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 239 So.2d 465.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4099
<ALLOWANCES>                                       507
<INVENTORY>                                       1152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4981
<PP&E>                                            1464
<DEPRECIATION>                                     904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3079
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2148
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1431)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5682
<SALES>                                            591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4753
<CGS>                                              472
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (5)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    145
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                120
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
#### Dejean BROUSSARD v. Robert L. WATERBURY.

No. 60329.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Robert L. Waterbury applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court *675of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 346 So.2d 1342.

Writ denied: No error presented by the assignments of error urged.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 96-30408

_______________

KURT M. SCHNEIDER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS GEORGE A. HORMEL & CO., ALAN RASELL,

and HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(93-CV-1264"L”)

_________________________ August 26, 1997 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

Kurt Schneide r appeals an adverse jury verdict on his claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C.
§ 621 et seq. We have reviewed the briefs submitted on appeal and applicable portions of the record and have heard the oral arguments of counsel. The primary issue appears to be whether the jurycharge reversibly failed to instruct that the jury could infer

discrimination from the plaintiff's proof of the prima facie case and pretext. We conclude that the charge could have been more specific in specifying that the jury could infer a discriminatory motive from

a finding of pretext. Nothing in the charge, however, indicates that the jury was prohibited from drawing that inference. Neither the charge nor any of the other rulings of the district court that are complained of constitute reversible error. The judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
254 La. 753

#### Application of Claudel WILLIAMS for a writ of habeas corpus v. SUPERINTENDENT OF the STATE INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL FOR COLORED YOUTH.

No. 50139.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 29, 1969.

In re: Claudel Williams applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jorge Zalazar-Franco, * From the 39th District Court

of Haskell County

Trial Court No. 6877.

Vs. No. 11-18-00045-CR * February 13, 2020

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# Summary - All Recipients

# Summary - States Splits

# Summary - Local Splits
Treasury approves Alaska’s plan to invest $12 million of CPF funding in a 

multi-purpose community facility to improve resources for communities 

that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Alaska

 

▪ Program Summary: $12 million for a Multi-Purpose Community Facility (11% of 

CPF allocation)

▪ Program Description: The construction of five 

multi-purpose community facilities in the villages of 

Shishmaref, Gambell, Shaktoolik, Elim and Teller. 

Each facility will provide residents of the villages free 

access to internet and computers, private spaces to 

conduct work and attend telehealth appointments, and common spaces for 

specialty clinics and health support groups. The facilities will also include a testing 

center to administer GED tests and college equivalency tests, and provide 

professional training professional opportunities.

▪ Key State Contact: Kawerak, Inc.

Alaska Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Alaska estimates the 

facilities will serve 

approximately 2,000 

community members 

across the five villages.
#### William G. COLLINS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA TOWING CORPORATION, etc., et al., Respondents. William G. COLLINS, Administrator of the Estate of Brent Lewis Collins, Deceased, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA TOWING CORPORATION, etc., et al., Respondents.

Nos. 42260, 42261.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 30, 1972.

Certiorari dismissed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Case No. 5D21-2490

LT Case No. 2018-CF-027018-A

DIDEROT SUFFRENA, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed April 12, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Brevard County, 

Tesha Ballou, Judge. 

Jeremiah D. Allen, of The Law Office 

of Jeremiah D. Allen, P.A., Orlando, 

for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
#### Martha Jane ADAMS, Appellant, v. D. M. ADAMS, Appellee.

No. O-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 29, 1971.

Duncan & Foster, Panama City, for appellant.

Isler, Welch, Bryant, Smith, Higby & Brown, Panama City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a post-judgment order which modified the provisions of a final judgment of divorce by increasing the amount of child support required to be paid by appellee to appellant, but refusing to require appellee to increase the amount of alimony payable to appellant under the terms of the final judgment.

Appellant earnestly contends that she has demonstrated by competent evidence a material change in her circumstances, and the circumstances of her minor child, since the date of the final judgment. Her position is that the changed circumstances brought about by a substantial increase in the cost of living and the advancing age of her child are such that the trial court abused its discretion in denying her an increase in alimony and allowing only a $25.00 per month increase in child support.

The evidence on the question of need by the wife and child was in conflict and sharply disputed by appellee. A presumption of correctness clothes the judgment of a trial court when it reaches the appellate court for review. Considering the totality of the evidence contained in the record before us, we are unable to agree with appellant that the trial court’s disposition of appellant’s petition to modify the financial *335requirements of the final judgment of divorce are so unreasonable as to constitute an abuse of discretion.1 The order of modification appealed herein is accordingly affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON, and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

1

. Ames v. Ames, (Fla.App.1963) 153 So.2d 737; Kirby v. Kirby, (Fla.App.1959) 111 So.2d 299.
Exhibit 99

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Congoleum Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Roger
S. Marcus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and H. N. Feist III, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/    Roger S. Marcus
------------------------------
Name:  Roger S. Marcus
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 14, 2002

/s/    Howard N. Feist III
------------------------------------
Name:  Howard N. Feist III
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 14, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2121 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2121

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
        of the exclusion for dependent care assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2021

  Mrs. Axne (for herself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mrs. Hinson, Ms. Jacobs of 
 California, Ms. Wild, Mr. Sires, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Harder of California, 
Mr. Cohen, Mr. Carbajal, and Mr. Lynch) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
        of the exclusion for dependent care assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Child Care for Working 
Families Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION OF EXCLUSION FOR DEPENDENT CARE 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 129(a)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$5,000 ($2,500'' and inserting 
``$10,500 (half such dollar amount''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred in calendar years beginning after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1256

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM036AD

DECA EI4394, R1 --- 1/13/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit 99.8



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Bellatrix Exploration Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Brown, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of the operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	March 21, 2013



| | /s/ Edward J. Brown                                 | 
| | --------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Edward J. Brown                                     | 
| | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 9, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00261

- CV

John E. FITZGIBBON , Sr., The Fitzgibbon Family Partnership, Ltd., and Rita Fitzgib bon, Appellant s

v.

Janice F. HUGHES

, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CVF001577

- D1 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On July 30, 2014 , this court issued a memora ndum opinion reversing the judgment of the trial court and remanding the case to the trial court for further proceedings . On September 5, 2014, appellants filed an unopposed motion to expedite mandate pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 18.1(c) requesting that th e mandate be issued immediately. The motion is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is instructed to issue the mandate immediately. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.1(c).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Winston E. Hickman, Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: December 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Winston E. Hickman 
|                        |  |  |  | Winston E. Hickman     
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.