alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.9


CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





I, Nick DeMare, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Tasman Metals Ltd.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: December 28, 2011





/s/ Nick DeMare


Nick DeMare


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Douglas A. Treco, Ph.D., certify that:

 
|  | 1. |  | I have reviewed this   Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2019   of Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and |
|--|----|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|  | 2. |  | Based on my knowledge,   this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit   to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of   the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with   respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--|----|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: April 3, 2020

 
|                                                                      |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ DOUGLAS A. TRECO                                                      |   |
| Douglas A. Treco, Ph.D.                                                   |   |
| *President   and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)* |   |

 

----
Exhibit 15









May 5, 2006









Northeast Utilities

107 Selden Street

Berlin, CT 06037



We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report dated May 5, 2006 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph related to significant charges recorded in connection with the Companys decision to exit certain business lines, and the presentation of certain components as discontinued operations); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.



We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-34622, 33-40156, and 333-128811 on Forms S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-63023, 333-52413, 333-63144 and 333-106008 on Forms S-8 of Northeast Utilities.



We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.





/s/

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP





Hartford, Connecticut
Northeast UtilitiesExhibit 12Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(In thousands)Six Months
EndedJune 30, 2008Year Ended December 31,Earnings, as defined:(unaudited)20072006200520042003Net income/(loss) from continuing 
     operations before cumulative effect of 
     accounting change$        116,241$        245,896$            132,936$         (256,903)$       70,423$        77,105Income tax expense/(benefit)46,598109,420(76,326)(184,862)22,38819,751Equity in earnings of regional nuclear 
     generating and transmission companies(967)(3,983)(334)(3,311)(2,592)(4,487)Dividends received from regional 
     equity investees3414,5422,1456873,8798,904Fixed charges, as below146,693275,611267,243265,046235,699228,974Less: Interest capitalized 
     (including AFUDC)(9,094)(17,568)(14,482)(10,463)(4,517)(5,030)Preferred dividend security requirements
     of consolidated subsidiaries(4,632)(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)(9,265)Total earnings/(loss), as defined$        295,181$        604,653$            301,917$         (199,071)$     316,015$      315,952Fixed charges, as defined:Interest on long-term debt (a)$          89,222$        162,841$            141,579$          131,870$     107,365$        88,700Interest on rate reduction bonds26,70361,58074,24287,43998,899108,359Other interest (b)12,77615,82422,37519,2768,58610,254Rental interest factor4,2678,5335,3006,7337,0677,366Preferred dividend security requirements
    of  consolidated subsidiaries4,6329,2659,2659,2659,2659,265Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)9,09417,56814,48210,4634,5175,030Total fixed charges, as defined$        146,693$        275,611$$            267,243$          265,046$     235,699$      228,974Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges2.012.191.13(0.75)(c)1.341.38(a)
Interest on long-term debt amounts include amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness.(b)
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007, other interest includes interest expense related to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109."(c)
Consolidated earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $464.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000023426
<NAME> THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            3,654,828
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                            538,238
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 334,312
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             1,184,205
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5,711,583
<COMMON>                                               122,229
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                              664,129
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                    355,312
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                       1,141,670
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  129,072
<PREFERRED>                                            116,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                 1,863,193
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                      10,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                          140,005
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                3,750
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                            124,327
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        38,433
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       2,144,933
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                        5,711,583
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                            1,170,185
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                   (29,742)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           1,173,717
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           1,152,858
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                 17,327
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                     (14,714)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                          11,496
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                68,836
<NET-INCOME>                                           (57,340)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                              7,320
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                          (64,660)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                     0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                    0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 275,534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.00
        

</TABLE>
October 19, 1977



### Travel and Subsistence Expenses for the DirectorDesignate of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

In response to your request, we have examined the question of whether Department of Justice funds are legally available to, pay the airfare and per diem for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director-designate’s travel to Washington, D.C., in connection with his confirmation hearings. We understand that he came to Washington on October 4, 1977, at the Attorney General’s request and intended to remain until his Senate confirmation hearing was to begin on October 11. In the interim, he conferred with the Attorney General and other officers on Department business. We further understand that he has returned home for reasons of health and that the confirmation hearing has been indefinitely postponed. After consultation with the General Accounting Office, we conclude that Department funds may be used to pay travel and subsistence expenses arising from the October 4 trip. We also conclude that they may be used to pay travel and subsistence at such time as he returns for his confirmation hearings if he consults with the Department oil official business at the same time. With respect to travel and subsistence expenses incurred to attend Senate confirmation hearings, the Comptroller General has stated that these are normally “personal” and hence cannot be reimbursed. 53 Comp. Gen. 424, 425 (1973). The same decision holds, however, that an agency may pay these expenses:

If official business, such as conferences with officials of your office, is also conducted by the nominee at the time he is in Washington,D.C., for his confirmation hearings, and such business is determined to be of “substantial benefit” to the [agency] . . . . Id. at
425.

Thus, if the Director-designate consults with the Attorney General or other Department officers on official business during his confirmation hearing, and the Attorney General or his delegate determines that the 

### 77-60 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE
DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL

246consultation is of “substantial benefit” to the Department, under theholding the payment of his travel and subsistence expenses from Department funds is permissible. As it is our understanding that he has consulted with Department officials in order to familiarize himself with his duties as FBI Director, we conclude that the travel expenses in question may be paid.

L e o n U l m a n Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Office o f Legal Counsel

247
Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

Environmental Protection Division • Air Protection Branch 

4244 International Parkway • Suite 120 • Atlanta • Georgia 30354 

404/363-7000 • Fax: 404/363-7100 

Judson H. Turner, Director 

CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND RULE ADOPTION 

I do hereby certify that a public hearing was held on January 30, 2015, concerning 

proposed amendments to Georgia's State Implementation Plan (SIP) to incorporate 

revisions to Georgia's Rules for Air Quality, Chapter 391-3-1. 

A public notice was posted on GovDelivery.com, providing at least 30 days for review and 

comments for the revisions to the State Implementation Plan. 

I do further certify that the proposed rule amendments were adopted in accordance with 

the State of Georgia's procedures for rule adoption. A public hearing was held on March 6, 

2014 concerning the proposed rule amendments. The proposed rule amendments were 

adopted by the Board of Natural Resources on March 25, 2014; were filed with the 

Secretary of State's office on April14, 2014; and became effective on May 4, 2014. 

A public notice regarding the proposed rule amendments was posted on EPD's Environet 

website and on GovDelivery.com, providing at least 30 days for review and comments . 

. ~/If, /?; li--

~~v{J cy .. ~W_;hlUVl Notary Pub - K. Lynne Coll1er 

LYNNE COLLIER 

NOTARY PUBLIC 

' FAYETTE COUNTY 

' ( :§?TATE.qF GRGR61A 

£,.kllll-Y CO~ f)\gJBSS~RCH 6, 2017 

Date 

J s W. Boylan, Ph.D., Manager 

Planning and Support Program 

Date
#### ROBSON v. ROBINSON et al.

No. 39159.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0379

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CLAYTON LEE WELLKNOWN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 5, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 28 2021

01/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0379
816 A.2d 68

#### In the Matter of the APPLICATION of Daniel D. ROSENDALE for Admission to the Bar of Maryland.

Misc. No. 16,

Sept. Term, 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Feb. 7, 2003.

Andrew Jay Graham, Baltimore, for applicant.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, JJ.

*ORDER*

The Court having considered the adverse recommendation of the Character Committee for the Fifth Appellate Circuit and the favorable recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners, concerning Daniel D. Rosendale’s application for admission to the Bar of Maryland, and the oral argument of applicant’s counsel presented at a hearing held before this Court on February 6, 2003, it is this 7th day of February, 2003.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the favorable recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners be, and it is hereby, accepted, and the adverse recommendation of the Character Committee be, and it is hereby, rejected and it is further

ORDERED, that the applicant, Daniel D. Rosendaie, upon taking the oath prescribed by the statute, be admitted to the practice of law in this State, subject only to the filing of an updating oath as to the character information.
| Name                                                  | Jurisdiction of Organization |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                                  |                         |
| The KEYW Corporation                                  | Maryland                     |
|                                                  |                         |
| S&H Enterprises of Central Maryland, Incorporated | Maryland                     |
|                                                  |                         |
| Integrated Computer Concepts, Incorporated            | Maryland                     |
|                                                  |                         |
| Coreservlets.com, Incorporated                        | Maryland                     |
|                                                  |                         |
| The Analysis Group, LLC                               | Virginia                     |
|                                                  |                         |
| Insight Information Technology, LLC                   | Delaware                     |
|                                                  |                         |
| Sycamore.US, Inc.                                     | Maryland                     |
|                                                  |                         |
| Sycamore Services, Inc.                               | Maryland                     |
|                                                  |                         |
| Everest Technology Solutions, Inc.                    | Delaware                     |

----
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report
of SES Solar Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Sandrine Crisafulli,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 11, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      SANDRINE CRISAFULLISandrine
      CrisafulliChief
      Financial Officer
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Oct - Dec

2017 Actual 204 282 (8) 274 70 229 (12)

Jan - Mar

2018 Actual 374 488 (54) 435 61 290 (30)

Apr - Jun

2018 Actual (43) 72 (72) 0 43 333 (48)

Jul - Sep

2018 Actual 212 353 (89) 264 52 385 (66)

Oct - Dec

2018 Actual 291 426 (117) 309 17 402 (91)

Jan - Mar

2019 Actual 375 374 (67) 306 (68) 334 (46)

Apr - Jun

2019 Actual 13 40 (97) (57) (70) 264 (67)

Jul - Sep

2019 Actual 281 440 (40) 400 119 382 (30)

Oct - Dec

2019 Actual 313 330 7 337 24 404 0

Jan - Mar

2020 Actual 365 477 (1) 476 111 515 0

Apr - Jun

2020 Actual 1,526 2,753 (20) 2,733 1207 1722 0

Jul - Sep

2020 Actual 401 454 7 461 60 1782 0

Oct - Dec

2020 Actual 648 597 (3) 595 (53) 1729 0

Jan - Mar

2021 Actual 1008 401 1 402 607 1122 0

Apr - Jun

2021 Actual 591 319 2 321 (270) 852 0

Jul - Sep

2021 Actual 751 103 11 115 (637) 215 0

Oct - Dec

2021 Actual 480 689 (18) 670 191 406 0

Jan - Mar

2022 Actual 423 668 1 669 245 652 0

Apr - Jun

2022 Actual (180) 7 (55) (49) 131 782 (30)

Jul - Sep

2022 Actual 453 457 (151) 307 (146) 636 (120)

Oct - Dec October 31, 2022 288 550 (197) 352 64 700 (139)

2022 Actual 368 373 (194) 179 (189) 447 (139)

Forecast Revisions 80 (177) 3 (174) (253) (253) 0

Jan - Mar October 31, 2022 515 578 (263) 315 (200) 500 (221)

2023 January 30, 2023 609 932 (270) 662 53 500 (221)

Forecast Revisions 93 353 (7) 347 253 0 0

Apr - Jun

2023 January 30, 2023 (5) 278 (233) 45 50 550 (180)

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDDIE WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 612 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
63112 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 98–11]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/RM, (703)

604–6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 98–11,

which attached transmittal and policy

justification pages.

Dated: November 20, 1997.

L. M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63113
63114 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63115

[FR Doc. 97–30991 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–C
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6079

MACK WAYNE PETERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-94-741-5-HC-BO)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mack Wayne Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Peterson v. North Carolina Dep't Corr., No. CA-94-741-5-HCBO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument and

deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED