alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       EXHIBIT 11
                                                CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                                     AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                            Computation of Earnings Per Share



                                        Three Months Ended September 30             Nine Months Ended September 30
                                             2000                  1999                  2000                  1999
                                             ----                  ----                  ----                  ----
<S>                                      <C>                   <C>                   <C>                    <C>

Computation of share
totals used in
computing earnings
per share:

Weighted average number
 of shares outstanding                     18,853,398            18,737,444            18,826,726            18,688,742

Basic average shares
 a-Outstanding                             18,853,398            18,737,444            18,826,726            18,688,742

Incremental shares
 arising, from out-
 standing stock
 options                                       88,634               116,994               115,308               112,196
                                          -----------          ------------          ------------           -----------

 b-Totals                                  18,942,032            18,854,438            18,942,034            18,800,938
                                         ============          ============          ============           ===========

c-Net Income                             $ 27,327,387          $  5,008,263          $ 37,484,286            18,007,958
                                         ============          ============          ============           ===========

Net Income Per Share
 Basic - c/a                             $       1.45          $       0.27          $       1.99           $      0.96
                                         ============          ============          ============           ===========

Net Income Per Share
assuming full dilution c/b               $       1.44          $       0.27          $       1.98           $      0.96
                                         ============          ============          ============           ===========
</TABLE>
June 18, 2014

Mr. John Hebbelman Jr.

715 Hebbelman Lane

Chinook, MT 59523

Dear Mr. Hebbleman:

This is in response to your letter dated May 7, 2014, petitioning the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption No. 10110. That exemption from 

§ 91.109(a) and (b)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allowed you to 

conduct certain flight instruction in Beechcraft Bonanza, Debonair, Baron and Travel Air

aircraft equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel instead of functioning dual 

controls.

On August 19, 2011, the FAA issued a revision to 14 CFR § 91.109 as part of the “Pilot in 

Command Proficiency Check and Other Changes to the Pilot and Pilot School Certification 

Rules” final rule (76 FR 54095; August 31, 2011), which became effective October 31, 2011. 

A copy of the rule is enclosed.

Since the relief you requested is now permitted in the revised § 91.109, an exemption is no 

longer required. Therefore we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

//s//

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert S. Benou
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|                       |                                           | 
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | 
|Dated:
 April 16, 2010 | /s/ Robert
 S. Benou                      | 
|                       |                                           | 
|                       | Robert S.
 Benou                         
|                       | Chairman,
 Chief Executive Officer, Chief
|                       | Financial
 Officer and Treasurer          | 

The foregoing
certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Trade Link Wholesalers Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Galina Shalimova, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Galina Shalimova                                                      

Galina Shalimova

Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated: December 1, 2010

 

 

----
#### James MELSON v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39175.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### Lee Arthur HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Jeanette V. SOILEAU et al., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 3156.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 29, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 1970.

Writ Refused Oct. 7, 1970.

Preston N. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellant:

Dubuisson and Dubuisson, by James T. Guglielmo, Opelousas, for defendant-appel-lee.

Before TATE, HOOD and CUL-PEPPER, JJ.

HOOD, Judge.

This is an action for damages arising out of the death of Sammy Vizena. It was instituted by four of the surviving children of the decedent against Chem-Gas Products Company and its insurer, Travelers Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs have appealed.

We are rendering judgment today in the companion case of Hilda Vizena v. Travelers Insurance Company et al., La.App., 1970, 238 So.2d 238. The cases were consolidated for trial, and the same issues are presented in both cases.

For the reasons which we assigned in the Vizena case, supra, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiffs-appellants.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.
#### MICAL PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Mrs. Ramona OWEN, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 40699.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 6, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Earl BALTZAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Osborne WILLIAMS et al., Defendant-Appellees.

No. 3502.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 24, 1971.

Shapiro & Shapiro, by Alfred B. Shapiro, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gold, Hall, Hammill & Little, by James D. Davis, Stafford, Pitts & Bolen, by Grove Stafford, Jr., Polk, Foote, Randolph & Percy, by James M. Percy, Alexandria, for defendant-appellees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and DOMEN-GEAUX, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

In the district court, defendant Travelers Insurance Company was granted a summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s action as to it. From this judgment, plaintiff has appealed to this court.

Plaintiff Earl Balizar has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal on the ground that the summary judgment against him and in favor of Travelers Insurance Com*419pany has not been signed and placed in the record.

A careful search of the record and a check with the Clerk of the Ninth Judicial District Court has revealed that, ib fact, no formal judgment separate ana apart from the written reasons of the district judge granting the motion for summary judgment was ever signed or read and rendered in open court in this matter.

Article 1918 of the Code of Civil Procedure states:

> “A final judgment shall be identified as such by appropriate language. When written reasons for the judgment are assigned, they shall be set out in an opinion separate from the judgment.”

There is ample jurisprudential authority interpreting this article which points out that the trial judge’s written reasons for judgment do not constitute a final judgment from which an appeal would lie. Fisher v. Rollins, 231 La. 252, 91 So.2d 28; Anderson v. Nugent, La.App., 16 So.2d 282; Deason v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., 204 So.2d 428; Abramson v. Piazza, La.App., 198 So.2d 565.

The record in this case contains only the trial judge’s signed written reasons for judgment. In contravention of the aforementioned Article 1918 there is no separate formal judgment which has been read, rendered and signed in the instant case. Thus, the appeal herein is premature, and this appeal must therefore be dismissed without prejudice so as to allow a proper judgment to be signed by the district judge.

For the reasons assigned, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice at the cost of plaintiff-appellant.

Appeal dismissed.
Treasury approves Florida’s plan to invest $86.9 million of CPF funding in 

multi-purpose community facilities to improve resources for rural 

communities that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Florida

 

▪ Program Summary: $86.9 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (24% of 

CPF allocation)

▪ Program Description: Florida’s Multi-Purpose

Community Facilities Projects (MPCPF) program is a

competitive grant program that provides funding to

eligible entities to construct or improve community

facilities.

Successful applicants will be required to partner with the CareerSource Florida 

Local Workforce Development Board serving that area to aid job seekers. The 

MPCF program will prioritize projects in rural communities with demonstrated 

economic distress factors. 

Key State Contact: The Florida Department of Economic Opportunity

Florida’s Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Florida estimates that 

this program will fund 

50-60 projects that 

improve community 

facilities.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

t0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148616

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148616

COA: 318187 

Tuscola CC: 12-012608-FH

BENJAMIN ALLEN SWITEK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K of DynaVox Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year
ended July 1, 2011, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward L. Donnelly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 27, 2011



/S/ EDWARD L. DONNELLYEdward L. DonnellyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

54 

KA 12-01614 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETER J. HARRIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY J. BRENNAN, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (CARL J. ROSENKRANZ OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Thomas G.

Leone, J.), rendered December 8, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in

the third degree, criminal mischief in the third degree, menacing in

the second degree and harassment in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in

the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]) and criminal mischief in the

third degree (§ 145.05 [2]). Viewing the evidence in light of the

elements of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third

degree as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342,

349), we conclude that the verdict convicting defendant of that crime

is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v

Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Contrary to defendant’s further

contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the

conviction of criminal mischief in the third degree (see generally

id.). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. 

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER97-4427-000]


Electric Lite, Inc.; Notice of Filing

November 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 21, 1997, Electric Lite, Inc., tendered 
for filing additional information to its September 2, 1997, filing in 
the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure 918 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before November 28, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30644 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of The Connecticut Light and Power Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.   /s/Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:   May 9, 2007    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2.1



Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Eugene R. McGrath, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the Company) certify that
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, which this statement accompanies, (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    Eugene R. McGrathEugene R. McGrath




Dated: November 5, 2004
#### J. Cail LEE, Judge, Court of Record in and for Broward County, Florida, Appellant, v. Robert W. JOHNSTON and Joseph E. Madeline, Appellees.

No. 72-391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 2, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Daniel R. Lutz,
Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 20, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel R. Lutz     
|                         |  |  |  | Daniel R. Lutz         
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Richard FERGUSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 46286.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1971.

William E. Andrews, Jr., Purvis, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by John M. Kinard and Timmie Hancock, Special Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Code Green Apparel Corp. 10-Q


Exhibit 10.26


 





 






    


     


    

 


 


 






    2


     


    

 


 


 






    3


     


    

 





 






    4


     


    

 


 


 


 






    6


     


    

 





 






    8


     


    

 





 






    9
#### Per SCHEUTZ, Appellant, v. O. B. THOMPSON, INC., Appellee.

No. 70-935.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.