alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Domtar
Nekoosa Mill
301 Point Basse Avenue Nekoosa, WI 54457-1422

Tel. : (715) 886-7785 annabeth.reitter@domtar.com

www.domtar.com September 12, 2014

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 6 Attn: Dayana Medina

1445 Ross Avenue #1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733

SUBJECT: Domtar A.W. LLC’s Response to Request to Provi de Information Pursuant to the Clean Air Act dated June 4, 2014

Dear Ms. Medina:

As we discussed, enclosed are th e follow-up responses to Question 9 raised after our webinar presentation on August 21, 2014, as well as additi onal questions relating to the wet scrubber and two other items.

I will forward an affidavit using the same format as the prior affidavit next week. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the en closed information or if further clarification is
needed.

Sincerely,

Annabeth Reitter Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation

Enclosure

cc: Mark A. Thimke, Foley & Lardner LLP
CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                               Twelve Months Ended
                             (Thousands of Dollars)


                                                DECEMBER             DECEMBER
                                                    1998                 1997
                                               ----------           ---------


Earnings
 Net Income Available for Common                 $712,742             $694,479
 Preferred Dividends                               17,007               18,344
 Federal Income Tax                               318,980              357,100
 Federal Income Tax Deferred                       95,140               31,450
 Investment Tax Credits Deferred                   (8,710)              (8,830)
                                               ----------           ----------

    Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax    1,135,159            1,092,543

Fixed Charges*                                    345,513              353,689
                                               ----------           ----------

    Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax
      and Fixed Charges                        $1,480,672           $1,446,232
                                               ==========           ==========



* Fixed Charges

 Interest on Long-Term Debt                      $294,894             $306,109
 Amort. of Debt Discount, Premium & Expense        13,777               12,049
 Interest on Component of Rentals                  18,442               18,448
 Other Interest                                    18,400               17,083
                                               ----------           ----------

    Total Fixed Charges                          $345,513             $353,689
                                               ==========           ==========



    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges               4.29                 4.09
256 La. 793

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William JOHNSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50832.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1970.

In re: William Johnson applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, and mandamus.

Application denied. The issues raised were litigated and disposed of in the original prosecution. Hence, they cannot be reurged in a post-conviction proceeding. See State ex rel. Barksdale v. Dees, 252 La. 434, 211 So.2d 318 (1968).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

PRINCETON JAMAAL LEE PERRY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30094

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00008-WFN-32

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Wm. Fremming Nielsen, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 5, 2016** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and GOULD, Circuit Judges and BURNS,*** District

Judge.

 

FILED

FEB 12 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Larry A. Burns, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
Princeton Perry appeals his sentence imposed for conspiring to distribute

oxycodone-based pills in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). We have

jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not err by including drugs attributable to Inaliel Lisbey

in calculating Perry’s base offense level. “[I]n the case of a jointly undertaken

criminal activity . . . all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in

furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity” shall be factored in when

calculating a defendant’s offense level. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (2014). The

district judge reasonably concluded that Perry and Lisbey were working together

during the relevant period of the conspiracy, and that therefore the drugs

attributable to Lisbey were within the scope of their jointly undertaken criminal

activity and reasonably foreseeable to Perry. See United States v. Treadwell, 593

F.3d 990, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.1


 





January 31, 2018


 


Via Email: bretc@ageagle.com


 


AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.


Bret Chilcott, CEO


South 4th Street


Neodesha, KS 66757


 


		RE:	Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated October 19, 2017 by
and between EnerJex Resources, Inc., AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., and Brett Chilcott as Shareholder’s
Representative



 


Dear Mr. Chilcott:


 


Pursuant to Section
7.01(b) of the Merger Agreement, EnerJex Resources, Inc. hereby notifies you of the extension of the End Date as defined in the
Merger Agreement, to March 31, 2018.


 


 





	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Louis G. Schott
	 	Interim Chief Executive Officer







 


 


cc:
Via Electronic Mail


 


Mitchell S. Nussbaum, Esq., Loeb &
Loeb LLP <mnussbaum@loeb.com>
1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond

L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2722

___________

Jeffrey S. Gundersen, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

W. I. LeBlanc, Warden, FMC- *

Rochester, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: July 17, 2007

Filed: July 20, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Jeffrey Gundersen appeals the district court’s1

 order dismissing

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with

the district court that the record did not support a due process violation arising from

the disciplinary proceedings at issue. See Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-

57 (1985) (describing process required when prison disciplinary hearing may result
-2-

in loss of good-conduct time); Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d 1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003)

(de novo standard of review for dismissal of § 2241 petition). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                   3,025
<SECURITIES>                             5,024
<RECEIVABLES>                           18,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                              4,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        32,287
<PP&E>                                   2,216
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          44,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,783
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   469
<OTHER-SE>                              31,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            44,190
<SALES>                                 14,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        43,762
<CGS>                                    6,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           40,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        14,265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (213)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          3,421
<INCOME-TAX>                             1,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      2,121
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             2,121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .42
<FN>
NOTE:  RECEIVABLES AND PP&E VALUES REPORTED REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Paul R. PALMER, Executor of the Estate of Christopher E. Palmer, deceased, Appellant, v. TURF EXPRESS, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-59.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 27, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Report on the Operation and Status of the 

Government Securities Investment Fund 

March S, 2019 to August 5, 2019 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8438(h) 

August 28• 2019 

On March 2, 2019, the outstanding debt subject to the limit was at the statutory debt limit. In 

order to protect the full faith and credit of the United States, beginning on March 5, 2019, the 

Secretary of the Treasury employed statutory authority to suspend investments in the Government 

Securities Investment Fund (G Fund) of the Thrift Savings Fund, part of the Federal Employees' 

Retirement System. Public Law 116-37 operated to suspend the statutory limit beginning August 

2, 2019, rendering further use of this authority unnecessary. The G Fund was fully restored by 

August 5, 2019. 

Legal authority: Section 8438(g)(l) of Title 5, United States Code, empowers the Secretary of the 

Treasury to "suspend the issuance of additional amounts of obligations of the United States [to

this fund), if such issuances could not be made without causing the public debt of the United 

States to exceed the public debt limit." The statute defines the period of this suspension as a 

"debt issuance suspension period." 5 U.S.C. § 8438(g)(6)(B). 

Reporting requirement: Section 8438(h)( l) requires submission of a report to Congress on the 

operation and status of the G Fund during each debt issuance suspension period. The report is to 

be made "as soon as possible after the expiration of such period, but not later than 30 days after 

the first business day after the expiration of such period." 5 U.S.C. § 8438(h)(l). This document 

fulfills the requirement of section 8438(h)( 1). A copy of this report is being concurrently 

transmitted to the Executive Director of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

Restoration requirement: Section 8438(g) requires the Secretary to make the G Fund whole upon 

expiration of a debt issuance suspension period. Treasury must issue obligations sufficient to 

ensure that the G Fund's portfolio replicates what it would have been upon the expiration of the 

period, as if the suspension had not occurred. 5 U.S.C. § 8438(g)(3). Treasury must also pay the 

G Fund an amount equal to the interest that the fund would have earned. 5 U.S.C. § 8438(g)(4). 

Status and operations: Throughout this debt issuance suspension period, a portion of the G 

Fund's holdings could not be re-invested without exceeding the debt limit. Treasury has now 

replicated the portfolio the G Fund would have held but for the suspension, and has paid the G 

Fund $1.674,685,628.67 for interest it would have earned, accounting for receipts and 

withdrawals. 

The table included as Attachment I details the daily and cumulative amounts of G Fund principal 

and interest that were suspended and restored. With the restoration of$ I 59,367,433,286.65 in 

principal on August 2, 2019, and $1,674,685,628.67 in interest on August 5, 2019, the G Fund 

was fully restored to the condition it would have been in had there not been a debt issuance 

suspension period.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0431 __________________________________________________________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

HEATHER ARLETA CALLANTINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s MOTION FOR EXTENSION of time, no 

objections from the State, and good cause having been shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time 

until, and including, December 15, 2021 within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 9 2021

11/09/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0431
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2011

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/29 10/4 10/6 30.00 29.00 27.00 87.00 -1.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 10/6 10/11 10/13 30.00 29.00 27.00 84.00 2.00

10/13 10/17 10/20 30.00 29.00 27.00 25.00 109.00 2.00

10/20 10/24 10/27 30.00 29.00 27.00 84.00 2.00

10/27 10/31 11/3 30.00 29.00 27.00 84.00 2.00

11/3 11/7 11/10 30.00 29.00 27.00 86.00 0.00

11/10 11/14 11/17 30.00 29.00 27.00 25.00 106.00 5.00

11/17 11/21 11/25 30.00 29.00 27.00 83.00 3.00

11/23 11/28 12/1 30.00 29.00 27.00 83.00 3.00

12/1 12/5 12/8 27.00 28.00 27.00 83.00 -1.00

12/8 12/12 12/15 24.00 27.00 27.00 25.00 105.00 -2.00

12/15 12/19 12/22 22.00 26.00 27.00 83.00 -8.00

12/22 12/27 12/29 20.00 26.00 27.00 83.00 -10.00

1157.00 1160.00 -3.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

5-DAY BILL 10/6 10/12 10.00 10.00 0.00

Matures 10/17

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE IN SIZE

3-year Note 10/6 10/11 10/17 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 10/6 10/12 10/17 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 10/6 10/13 10/17 13.00 0.00 0.00 66.00

30-year TIPS ® 10/13 10/20 10/31 7.00 0.00 0.00 7.00

2-year Note 10/20 10/25 10/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 10/20 10/26 10/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 10/20 10/27 10/31 29.00 0.00 57.24 41.76

3-year Note 11/2 11/8 11/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note 11/2 11/9 11/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 11/2 11/10 11/15 16.00 0.00 23.93 48.07

10-year TIPS ® 11/10 11/17 11/30 11.00 0.00 0.00 11.00

2-year Note 11/17 11/21 11/30 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 11/17 11/22 11/30 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 11/17 11/23 11/30 29.00 0.00 57.37 41.63

3-year Note 12/1 12/6 12/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 12/1 12/7 12/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Note ® 12/1 12/8 12/15 13.00 0.00 26.43 39.58

5-year TIPS ® 12/15 12/22 12/30 12.00 0.00 0.00 12.00

2-year Note 12/22 12/27 1/3 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 12/22 12/28 1/3 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 12/22 12/29 1/3 29.00 0.00 58.23 40.77

531.00 223.20 307.80

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 304.80
**Exhibit 32.1.2**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert N. Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the“Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: August 2, 2007
November 25 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GEORGE WOOD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00755

- CV V.

MARTI KENNEDY AND DOYLE MURPHREE, J R., INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS TEMPORARY CO

- ADMINISTRATORS OF TH E ESTATE OF DOYLE MURPHREE, SR., DECEA SED, APPELLEES

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , Marti Kennedy and Doyle Murphree, Jr. , Individual ly and as Temporary Co

Administrators of the Estate of Doyle Murphree, Sr., Deceased, signed August 6, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error as to the amount of damages awarded by the probate court for unpaid

rent , and w e therefore suggest a remittitur in the amount of $3,750 by Marti Kennedy and Doyle Murphree, Jr

. If within fifteen days of the date of this judgment, Marti Kennedy and Doyle Murphree, Jr.

, file with this C ourt a remittitur in the amount of $3,750 , the third and fourth paragraphs of the judgment of the court below will be REFORMED to state that Marti Kennedy and Doyle Murphree, Jr., Temporary Co

- Administrators of the Estate of Doyle Murphree, Sr.

, Deceased, recover from George Wood judgme nt for

— 1. $2,500 as the amount due for unpaid rent and AFFIRMED in part as reformed ; the portion of the judgment awarding $9,189.20 in attorney’s fees and costs advanced (together with interest thereon) will be REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with this Court’s opinion . If a remittitur is not filed

, weorder the portions of the judgment awarding damages for unpaid rent (together with costs and interest thereon) and awarding attorney’s fees and costs advanced (together with interest thereon) REVERSED and REMAND the cause for further proceedings in accordance with th is C ourt ’ s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee s , Marti Kennedy and Doyle Murphree, Jr., Individua lly and as Temporary Co

- Administrators of the Estate of Doyle Murphree, Sr., Deceased.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 32.1.2**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the“Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: May 2, 2008
United States Department of the Interior 

BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT 

Alaska OCS Region 

3801 Centerpoint Drive, Suite 500 

Anchorage, Alaska 99503-5823 

BOEM Seeks Public Involvement in Preparing an Environmental Assessment for a 

2014 Geophysical 3D Ocean Bottom Seismic Survey in the Beaufort Sea 

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is preparing an Environmental Assessment 

(EA) for a proposed seismic survey by SAExploration, Inc. (SAE). The proposed survey area 

covers approximately 220 square miles, including State lands north of the village of Nuiqsut as 

well as areas of shallow bottom-founded ice of the Beaufort Sea. The project is proposed to take 

place between February 15 and May 31,2014. Although the EA will include an analysis of 

proposed activities within the entire proposed project area, BOEM's jurisdictional permit 

authority is limited to activities in the Outer Continental Shelf. BOEM is inviting the public to 

comment on issues that should be considered by BOEM in preparing the EA. 

BOEM received SAE's 2014 Geological and Geophysical (G&G) Permit application on 

November 4, 2013. SAE's permit application 14-01 and an associated area coverage map are 

available for review at: http://www.boem.gov/About-BOEM!BOEM-Regions/AlaskaRegion/Resource-Evaluation!Permits/14 _ 0 1/index.aspx. 

BOEM is only accepting and considering public comments submitted through the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal (http://www.regulations.gov). The deadline to receive these comments is 

January 10, 2014 (midnight, EST). BOEM cautions that before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should 

be aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be 

made publicly available at any time. While you may ask BOEM (prominently at the beginning 

of your submission) to withhold your personal identifying information from public view, BOEM 

cannot guarantee that it will be able to do so. BOEM will not consider anonymous comments.
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUS:

                                -----------------

                              DWS Target 2013 Fund

                              DWS Target 2014 Fund

For DWS Target 2013 Fund, the following information replaces similar disclosure
in "The Fund's Main Investment Strategy" section of the fund's prospectus:

The fund seeks to provide a guaranteed return of investment on February 15, 2013
("the Maturity Date") to investors who reinvest all dividends and hold their
shares to the Maturity Date, and to provide long-term growth of capital.

For DWS Target 2014 Fund, the following information replaces similar disclosure
in "The Fund's Main Investment Strategy" section of the fund's prospectus:

The fund seeks to provide a guaranteed return of investment on November 15, 2014
("the Maturity Date") to investors who reinvest all dividends and hold their
shares to the Maturity Date, and to provide long-term growth of capital.











               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference



                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                   INVESTMENTS
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group
October 10, 2008
TARGET-MDC