alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                                         6,851
<SECURITIES>                                                   4,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 13,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                    2,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              26,702
<PP&E>                                                         1,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                35,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          9,356
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                         480
<OTHER-SE>                                                    25,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  35,575
<SALES>                                                       13,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              50,876
<CGS>                                                          4,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 46,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              15,745
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              (426)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                5,123
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            3,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   3,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    .61
<FN>
NOTE:  RECEIVABLES AND PP&E VALUES REPORTED REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.(the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: May 1, 2009
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STEVEN REVERDES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4055

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco

County; Pat Siracusa, Judge.

Brooke Elvington, Fort Lauderdale,

for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### Leon HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-629.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 25, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133442 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133442 COA: 265288 Wayne CC: 05-003760-01 WALTER MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     UT

<LEGEND>                      The schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from Consolidated
                              Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Statement of
                              Cash Flows for Consolidated
                              Edison, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety
                              by reference to such financial statements
                              and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>  
<CIK>  0001047862
<NAME> Consolidated Edison, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                               <C> 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                      Mar-31-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-Mos

<BOOK-VALUE>                      Per-Book

<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>         11,401,237

<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>       390,872

<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>            1,183,054

<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>          524,142

<OTHER-ASSETS>                    947,044

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    14,446,349

<COMMON>                          588,720

<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>         857,333

<RETAINED-EARNINGS>               4,753,375

<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>    5,868,573

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             37,050

<PREFERRED>                       212,563

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>              3,925,548

<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                   0

<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>            0

<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>    121,906

<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>     350,000

<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>            0

<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>       36,580

<LEASES-CURRENT>                  2,600

<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>    3,891,529

<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>     14,446,349

<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>         1,776,586

<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>              101,735

<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        1,416,384

<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        1,518,119

<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>           258,467

<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                1,801

<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>    260,268

<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>          80,223

<NET-INCOME>                      180,045

<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>       3,398

<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>     176,647

<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>          123,772

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>         75,843

<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>            287,938

<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .76

<EPS-DILUTED>                        .76
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5800-5801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-401-040]


Stainless Steel Plate From Sweden Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; Time Limits

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for the preliminary results of the review of the antidumping 
finding on stainless steel plate from Sweden. The review covers two 
manufacturers/

[[Page 5801]]

exporters of the subject merchandise the United States and the period 
June 1, 1995 through May 31, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Heaney or Linda Ludwig, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group 
III, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4475 or 482-0649, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Because it is not practicable to complete this review within the 
time limits mandated by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (245 days from 
the last day of the anniversary month for preliminary determinations, 
120 additional days for final determinations), pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the Department is 
extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results 
until June 30, 1997. See Decision Memorandum to Robert S. LaRussa dated 
February 3, 1997.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(3)(A)).

    Dated: February 3, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-3100 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
Ref.: 4235



March 21, 2013



Bellatrix Exploration Ltd.

2300, 530 Eighth Avenue SW

Calgary, AB T2P 3S8



Consent
of Independent Petroleum Engineers



We refer to our report dated March 5, 2013
and effective as of December 31, 2012, evaluating the crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves and the net present
value of future net revenue attributable to certain of the oil and natural gas assets of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd. ("Bellatrix")
effective as at December 31, 2012 (the "Report").



We hereby consent to the use and reference
to our name and the Report, and the information derived from the Report, as described or incorporated by reference in Bellatrix's
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed or to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission.



| | Sincerely,                    
| | ------------------------------
| |                               
| | SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED    
| |                               
| | /s/ Meghan M. Klein           
| |                               
| | Meghan M.Klein, P.Eng.        
| | Petroleum Engineer and Partner



Enclosure(s)

MMK:aml

W:\4235\consent\MMK
03 15 2013.docx
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR CONSOLIDATED
EDISON, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001047862
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   11,914,540
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    550,315
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,817,516
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,225,579
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,507,950
<COMMON>                                       588,720
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      857,742
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          5,111,002
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               5,542,724
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,050
<PREFERRED>                                    212,563
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         5,222,309
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 243,004
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  158,910
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     32,283
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 2,720
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,056,387
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               16,507,950
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    7,181,265
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           265,141
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   6,077,213
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   6,342,354
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        838,911
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               8,907
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 847,818
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       300,871
<NET-INCOME>                                   546,947
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     10,194
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  536,753
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       346,754
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      266,370
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         747,287
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.53


</TABLE>
Fondo de ayuda para el alquiler de la ciudad de Boston

Autocertificación de ingresos actuales (últimos 60 día

Le rogamos se sirva diligenciar el presente formulario si en los dos últimos meses ha percibido ingresos

laborales que no pueda demostrar con comprobantes, tales como talones de pago (ej. trabajo por cuenta

propia, salarios pagados en efectivo, remuneración por el cierre de una negociación, etc.).

Seleccione la opción que mejor describa su situación:

❏ Trabajo por cuenta propia

❏ Ingresos en efectivo

❏ Remuneración por el cierre de una negociación

❏ Ningún ingreso (incluidas las siguientes fuentes: ingresos, horas extras, empleo a tiempo parcial,

indemnización de la Administración de Veteranos (VA), ingresos brutos por alquiler o arrendamiento,

beneficios en efectivo, beneficios del Seguro Soc

En caso de que trabaje por cuenta propia o haya recibido ingresos en efectivo o remuneración por el

cierre de una negociación, declare los importes totales a continuación:

Mes Cantidad Fuente o empleador

1.

2.

3.

4.

Entiendo que estoy declarando mis ingresos pasados y actuales al Fondo de ayuda al alquiler de la ciudad de

Boston con el fin de establecer mi elegibilidad y para determinar el monto de la ayuda que necesito. Decla

bajo pena de perjurio que las declaraciones anteriores de los ingresos de mi núcleo familiar son verdaderas,

correctas, precisas y completas en todos los aspectos.

Nombre _______________________________________ Fecha _______________________________________

Firma electrónica _____________________________ Dirección ___________________________________
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

______________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 5, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 133098 (68)(70)(71) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

JAN KAY ESTES, Personal Representative of 

the Estate of Douglas Duane Estes,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 133098 

v COA: 261968 

Kalamazoo CC: 02-000529-NZ 

JEFF EDWARD TITUS, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

JULIE L. SWABASH, f/k/a JULIE L. TITUS, 

Appellant. 

On order of the Chief Justice, motions by the Business Law and Family Law 

Sections of the State Bar of Michigan for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are considered 

and they are GRANTED. The motion by the Business Law Section for leave to 

participate in oral argument is DENIED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 5, 2007 

 Clerk
ERA2 Reallocation Quarter 1 ‐ Voluntary Reallocation to Designated Entities

Transferring Entity (Transferor) Receiving Entity (Transferee) Amount to be Reallocated 

State of Alabama City of Birmingham $5,000,000.00

State of Alabama Jefferson County $20,000,000.00

State of Alabama City Of Huntsville $10,000,000.00

City and County of Denver State of Colorado $4,091,183.43 

State of Idaho City of Boise $10,000,000.00 

State of Louisiana Jefferson Parish $14,000,000.00 

State of Louisiana St. Tammany Parish $7,765,248.20 

State of Louisiana Lafayette City Parish $4,800,000.00 

State of Louisiana Caddo Parish $10,480,604.36 

State of Louisiana City of Baton Rouge $14,506,872.00 

State of Louisiana City of New Orleans $24,046,105.00 

State of Wisconsin Brown County $11,000,000.00 

State of Wisconsin City of Milwaukee $20,000,000.00 

State of Wisconsin City of Madison $33,000,000.00 

State of Wisconsin Dane County $27,000,000.00 

State of Wisconsin Milwaukee County $15,000,000.00 

Total $ 230,690,012.99
* Pursuant to 5th C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40786 Summary Calendar

DOUGLAS EDWARD ALLEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
B.C. CHANEY, Assistant Warden, Joe F. Gurney Unit, ET AL.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:96-CV-758

February 3, 1999

Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Douglas Edward Allen, Texas prisoner # 728150, filed a civil rights

complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Brenda Chaney, in her

capacity as the Assistant Warden at the Joe F. Gurney Unit; Michael

Ford, in his capacity as Correctional Officer; William Matthew, in his

capacity as Sergeant; and Nolan Pittock, in his capacity as Captain.

He argued that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his

serious medical needs when he was assigned to a prison job that did not

conform to his medical classification. Allen also contended that he was

subjected to false disciplinary proceedings. In his complaint, Allen2

requested that the matter be tried by a jury.

The magistrate judge issued an order scheduling an evidentiary

hearing pursuant to Flowers v. Phelps, 956 F.2d 488 (5th Cir.), modified

on other grounds
, 964 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1992). Based on the evidence

presented at the hearing, the magistrate judge recommended that Allen’s

case be dismissed. The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s

recommendation and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Allen did not waive his jury demand by participating in the Flowers

hearing without objection. S ee McAfee v. Martin
, 63 F.3d 436, 437-38

(5th Cir. 1995). In M cAfee
, the court stated that “because the right

to a jury trial is a fundamental right . . . courts should indulge every

reasonable presumption against waiver. A waiver should not be found in

a doubtful si tuation. “ Id. at 437 (internal quotations and citations

omitted). Accordingly, the judgement of the district court is VACATED,

and the case is REMANDED to the district court for additional

proceedings.

VACATE and REMAND.
256 La. 359

#### Parey P. BRANTON et al. v. Honorable Mary Evelyn PARKER, Treasurer State of Louisiana.

No. 50595.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1970.

In re: Parey P. Branton, Algie D. Brown, Frank Fulco and Frank J. Hall applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 233 So.2d 278.

The application is denied. The judgment complained of is correct.
#### Goss et al. *v.*Fiorini et al., Guardians.

*Guardianship—Docketing and notice of proceedings—Validity of deed by ward.*

(No. 17719

Decided May 29, 1923.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.

*Mr. Wm. S. Bhotehamel,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Fiorini & Solimano*and *Messrs. Murphy, Elliff, Leen <& Murphy,*for defendants in error.

By the Court.

This was an action to set aside a conveyance, upon the' ground that the grantor, Joseph B. Butt, was, at the time of the execution of the conveyance, an incompetent, under guardianship, by the finding and judgment of the probate court of Montgomery county.

The conveyance was executed on the 25th day of February, 1920. On the 9th day of the same month *116application fox- the appointment of a guardian had been made in the probate court. On the 12th or 13th day of the same month a hearing was had, and by the judgment of the probate court Joseph B. Bntt was adjudged an incompetent. On the 18th day of the same month an order of the probate court was made appointing Á. J. Fiorini and Arthur EL Leen as guardians of the estate. On the 25th day, being the day of the execution of the conveyance, an inventory was filed, the bond of the guardians was approved and filed, and the costs of the appointment paid.

The probate court, according to a rule of that court, did not docket or record any of the proceedings' until the costs were paid.

The cause was tried in the court of common pleas, where a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, defendants in error here. The cause was appealed, and the Court of Appeals rendered a like judgment. The record was ordered certified by this court upon the mistaken belief that the question of the effect of the failure of the probate court to docket and record the proceedings in the matter of the guardianship was involved.

The record, however, discloses that there was evidence tending to prove that the proceedings in the probate court were docketed immediately prior to the execution of the deed, and that the plaintiffs in error had actual notice of such proceedings and judgment prior to the docketing. The case having been disposed of by the Court of Appeals upon a question of fact, there is no question before this court for its consideration.

*117The petition in error will therefore be dismissed, at the costs of the plaintiffs in error.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

s0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140816 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140816 

 COA: 287224 

Wayne CC: 08-000539 

TERRENCE LAMAR SHAW, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 28, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.