alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 15.2







American Appraisal China Limited




1506 Dah Sing Financial Centre




108 Gloucester Road / Wanchai / Hong Kong






April 25, 2012






The Directors,




Camelot Information Systems Inc.




Beijing Publishing House


A6 North Third Ring Road


Xicheng District, Beijing 100120


The People’s Republic of China






Subject: WRITTEN CONSENT OF AMERICAN APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED






We hereby consent to the references to our name and to references to our valuation methodologies, assumptions and conclusions associated with such reports, in the annual reports on Form 20-F of Camelot Information Systems Inc., ("the Company") and any amendments thereto filed or to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We further consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011.  We also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such references and our consent in the Registration Statement No. 333-172742 on Form S-8 of Camelot Information Systems Inc.




In reaching our valuation conclusions, we relied on the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements and other data provided by Camelot Information Systems Inc. and its representatives. We did not audit or independently verify such financial statements or other data and take no responsibility for the accuracy of such information. The Company determined the fair values and our valuation reports were used to assist in reaching its determinations.




In giving such consent, we do not hereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder (the “Act”), nor do we admit that we are experts with respect to any part of such Registration Statements within the meaning of the term “experts” as used in the Act.




Yours faithfully,




/s/ American Appraisal China Limited
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 7 -00 147 -CV
Mer cedes- Benz USA, LLC and Continental Import s Hold ing, In c. d/b/a

Mer cedes- Benz of Aus tin , Appellan ts

v. Joseph Yousef

y , Appellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-03- 0021 79 , HO NORAB LE W. JEANNE MEURER , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N In Appellants’ Motion to Dismiss Appe al Pursuant to Settlement, Merce des-B enz USA, L L C and Continental Imports Holding, Inc. d/b/a Mer cede s-B enz of Austin repre sent that they no longe r wish to pursue this appe al, that the dismissal w o u l d n ot preve nt an entitled par ty from seeking re l i ef

, and that appe llee Joseph Yousefy is not opposed to the dismi ssal. We gr ant the mot ion and dis mis s th is a

pp e a l.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: June 1, 2007
#### MFA INSURANCE COMPANIES v. B. B. HOLLOWAY.

No. 50549.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 23, 1978.

Mitchell, McNutt, Bush, Lagrone & Sams,' Guy Mitchell, III, Tupelo, for appellant.

Gibson & Newlin, Donald F. Newlin, Bruce, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; W. W. Brown, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection with the amended AnnualReport of BlackStar Enterprise Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Joseph E. Kurczodyna, Chief FinancialOfficer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

            (1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

            (2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April17, 2017

/s/Joseph E. Kurczodyna

Joseph E. Kurczodyna, 

Chief Financial Officer & PrincipalAccounting Officer

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, exceptto the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2640]


Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM); 60-Day Notice 
of Proposed Information Collection; Refugee Biographic Data Sheet OMB 
#1405-0102

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Originating Office: Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration 
(PRM).
    Title of Information Collection: Refugee Biographic Data Sheet.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: OMB #1405-0102.
    Respondents: Refugees.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 75,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Estimated Bureau: 37,500.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Eliza McClenaghan,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30728 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-33-M
Vacate and Remand and Opinion Filed January 18, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-17-01070-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.F., J.V.F., J.A.F., AND J.D.F., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FA-17-0225 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Francis Before the Court is the lett er signed on January 5, 2018 by the parties’ attorneys, asking the Court to remand this case back to the trial c ourt for further proceedings consistent with their agreement. The parties informed the Court that th ey have resolved the case and incorporated the terms of their settlement agreement into their Amended Final Decree of Divorce. We construe the letter as a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. In accordance with the parties’ agreement, we grant the mo tion, vacate the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand th e case back to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

171070F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.F., J.V.F., J.A.F., AND J.D.F., CHILDREN
No. 05-17-01070-CV On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FA-17-0225. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Evans and Boatright participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and REMAND the case back to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Subject to any agreement be tween the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee Justin Lee Falcicchio recover his costs of this app eal from appellant Jenny Kay Falcicchio.
Judgment entered January 18, 2018.
#### In re STATE of Louisiana, In the Interest of Michael BOULIGNY, minor.

No. 8990.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Oct. 2, 1972.

*137Jerry H. Smith, Legal Aid Society, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Donald Wall, Probation Officer, for ap-pellee.

Before SARTAIN, ELLIS and BLANCHE, JJ.

BLANCHE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a finding by The Family Court of East Baton Rouge Parish that Michael Bouligny is within the purview of R.S. 13:1570, the Juvenile Court Act, and ordering that he be counseled and warned. No finding of delinquency was made.

The only error urged by appellant is that Michael Bouligny was not proven to be guilty of the crime with which he was charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

Under the provisions of Article VII, Section 52 of the Constitution of 1921, and R.S. 13:1591, appeals to this Court in cases of this type lie on questions of law alone. The Constitution provides as follows:

> “ * * * An appeal shall lie on questions of law and of fact when the judgment of the court affects the custody, care or control of children under seventeen years of age, but such appeal shall not discharge the child to whom said judgment relates from the custody of the Juvenile Court or of the person, institution or agency to whose care such child may be committed by the Juvenile Court unless the Supreme Court shall so order. An appeal also shall lie on questions of law and of fact on both interlocutory and final judgments in adoption proceedings; in all other cases an appeal shall lie on questions of law alone.”

Under those circumstances, we are without authority to review the findings of fact of the trial court or to consider or weigh the evidence presented. See State v. McCain, 168 La. 87, 121 So. 583 (1929); State v. Dunn, 140 La. 385, 73 So. 240 (1916).

It is only when there is no evidence to prove an essential element of the offense charged that we can make a factual determination, since a question of law is then presented. As long as there is some evidence presented on the point, no matter how little, we have not the authority to adjudicate fact.

*138Our review of the record reveals that there is evidence tending to prove all elements of the offense charged. We are without jurisdiction to pass judgment on the weight or sufficiency thereof.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
U.S. TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1ST QUARTER 2003

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/26 12/30 1/2 16.00 14.00 16.00 51.96 -5.96

3&6 MONTH BILLS 1/2 1/6 1/9 13.00 15.00 15.00 46.24 -3.24

1/9 1/13 1/16 11.00 16.00 15.00 48.39 -6.39

1/16 1/20 1/23 14.00 17.00 15.00 49.95 -3.95

1/23 1/27 1/30 16.00 18.00 16.00 49.92 0.08

1/30 2/3 2/6 22.00 19.00 17.00 45.80 12.20

2/6 2/10 2/13 22.00 19.00 17.00 42.00 16.00

2/13 2/17 2/20 22.00 19.00 17.00 43.00 15.00

2/20 2/24 2/27 22.00 19.00 17.00 45.00 13.00

2/27 3/3 3/6 22.00 19.00 17.00 50.00 8.00

3/6 3/10 3/13 22.00 19.00 17.00 49.00 9.00

3/13 3/17 3/20 20.00 18.00 16.00 49.00 5.00

3/20 3/24 3/27 20.00 18.00 16.00 49.00 5.00

683.00 619.27 63.74

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-Year TIPS (R) 1/6 1/8 1/15 6.00 -1.00 0.00 6.00

2-Year Note 1/27 1/29 1/31 27.00 21.72 5.28

5-Year Note 2/5 2/11 2/18 24.00 +2.00

10-Year Note 2/5 2/12 2/18 20.00 +2.00 21.59 22.41

2-Year Note 2/24 2/26 2/28 27.00 20.02 6.98

2-Year Note 3/24 3/26 3/31 27.00 20.64 6.36

131.00 83.97 47.03

R = Reopening NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 110.77

A = Announced

A A A

A

A

Treasury announced a Q1 

borrowing need of $110 

billion on 2/3/03.

A A

A A A

A A A

A A A

A A

A

A
#### Thomas HOLT, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director at Union Correction Institution, Union County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 43175.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
MEMORANDUM 

EPA New England 

DATE : February 9, 2010 

SUBJ: Rhode Island Preliminary 2009 Ozone Data 

FROM: Richard Burkhart fvl'~? 

Air Quality Planning Unit 

Thru: Anne Arnold, Manager Af~ 

Air Quality Planning Unit 

To: Rhode Island Proposed Clean Data Determination Docket 

The EPA is proposing to determine that the Providence (All of Rhode Island) moderate 1997 8-

hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This determination is based upon complete, quality-assured, 

certified ambient air monitoring data that shows the area has monitored attainment of the 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS for the 2006-2008 monitoring period . 

Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR Part 50, the 1997 8-hour ozone standard is attained when the 

3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations 

at an ozone monitor is less than or equal to 0.08 parts per million (ppm) (i .e., 0.084 ppm, based 

on the rounding convention in 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix 1) . This 3-year average is referred to as 

the design value. When the design value is less than or equal to 0.084 ppm at each monitor 

within the area, then the area is meeting the NAAQS. (See 69 FR 23857 (April 30, 2004) for 

further information.) 

In addition, preliminary ozone data for 2009 show the area continues to meet the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. This memorandum provides a printout of the preliminary ozone data for the 

2009 ozone season has been input into the EPA AQS system by the RI Department of 

Environmental Management (RI DEM), as of February 3, 2010. These data are attached to the 

memorandum. As shown in Table 1 below, the preliminary 2009 fourth high 8-hour ozone 

values at all three sites in the area are below the 1997 8-hour ozone standard . If these 
preliminary 2009 fourth highs are used with the data from 2007 and 2008, the design values for 

this area are still below the 1997 ozone standard . 

Table 1. Fourth-High 8-hour Ozone Average Concentrations and Design Values (parts per 

million) in the Rhode Island Area, 2009 Data is Preliminary, as of February 3, 2010 

Site Number Site Name 4th High 4th High Preliminary Preliminary 

2007 2008 2009 4t' high Design Values 

8-hour ozone 2007-2009 

440030002 West 0.089 0 .074 0.069 ppm 0.077 ppm I 

Greenwich 

440071010 East Providence 0.088 0.077 0.066 ppm 0.077 ppm 

440090007 Narragansett 0.083 0.081 0.068 ppm 0 .076 ppm 

At all three sites, the preliminary 2007-2009 design values are lower than the 2006-2008 design 

values . In conclusion, the preliminary ozone data for 2009 do not change the conclusions of the 

proposed Clean Data Determination that the area meets the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Final 2007-

2009 design values will not be available until the RIDEM certifies the AQS data, most likely in 

May 2010. 

Attachments: Preliminary 2009 1-hour ozone data for RI 

Preliminary 2009 8-hour ozone data for RI
FORM 10-Q

Exhibit 4.7(c)

              THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE 401(K) PROGRAM
                               OF
                     CONE MILLS CORPORATION

           (As Amended and Restated December 1, 1994)


     THIRD AMENDMENT, dated August 7, 1997, to The 401(k) Program
of Cone Mills Corporation, as Amended and Restated December 1,
1994, (the "Plan").

                            RECITALS

     The Board of Directors desires to clarify certain provisions
of the Plan and thereby to facilitate plan administration.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan be and hereby is amended, effective
January 1, 1997, as follows:

     (1)  By deleting the last two sentences of Plan Section
          6.10(a) and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

          "Amounts withdrawn shall be in the following order: (1)
          a portion or all of the SRP Voluntary Contribution
          Account; (2) a portion or all of the other SRP Accounts;
          (3) a portion or all of the EEP Voluntary Contributions
          Account; (4) a portion or all of the other EEP Accounts.
          Subject to paragraph (b), the maximum amount subject to
          withdrawal is the vested balance in the Member's Accounts
          as of the Valuation Date immediately preceding the date
          of application, but in no event shall a withdrawal be in
          excess of the amount necessary to meet the immediate and
          heavy financial need of the Member, and a withdrawal of
          less than $300 shall not be permitted."

     (2)  By deleting the heading and text of Plan Section 7.03 and
          inserting in lieu thereof the following:

          7.03 Investment of Account Pending Distribution

          "The respective accounts of a terminated Member or a
          Beneficiary who has not elected to take a distribution or
          is receiving a distribution in installments may be
          invested in any funds set forth in Section 7.01 above
          subject to all rights and limitations provided in Section
          7.02."


                              Page 81
<PAGE>
FORM 10-Q

Exhibit 4.7(c)   (continued)



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Third Amendment, having been approved
by the Board of Directors of Cone Mills Corporation at a meeting
duly held on August 7, 1997 is signed by the Vice President and
Secretary of the Corporation on the   7th   day of August, 1997.


                         CONE MILLS CORPORATION

                         By:   /s/ Terry L. Weatherford        
                         Title:    Vice President and Secretary


                              Page 82
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

OF

CHESAPEAKE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P.*

Delaware Corporation



|                                          |  |                   
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|                                          |  | State of Formation
|Chesapeake MLP Operating, L.L.C.          |  | Oklahoma          
|Chesapeake Midstream Gas Services, L.L.C. |  | Oklahoma          
|Texas Midstream Gas Services, L.L.C.      |  | Oklahoma          
|Magnolia Midstream Gas Services, L.L.C.   |  | Oklahoma          



|* | In accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(21), the names of particular subsidiaries that, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
significant subsidiary (as that term is defined in Rule 1-02(s) of Regulation S-X) as of the end of the year covered by this report have been omitted.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Oscar SAMBRINE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1319.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 14, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1978.

Philip Carlton, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged with two counts of manslaughter for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, which resulted in the deaths of two people. He was found guilty, non-jury, and given ten years’ probation, one year to be served in the County Jail.

On appeal, he urges error in the taking of a blood sample against his verbal objection and in the introduction of the lab report that showed he was under the influence of alcohol. He also urges error in the sufficiency of the evidence and, for the first time on appeal, alleges that the implied consent statute is unconstitutional. We find no error and affirm. *Clowney v. State,*102 So.2d 619 (Fla.1958); *Eizenman v. State,*132 So.2d 763 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961); *Lemming*v. *State,*159 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); *Crum v. State,*172 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); *Silver v. State,*188 So.2d 300 (Fla.1966); *State v. Fitzpatrick,*294 So.2d 708 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); *Gillman v. State,*346 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); *Miranda*v. *State,*354 So.2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.
Treasury approves North Dakota’s plan to invest $45 million of CPF funding 

in broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-speed internet 

to locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

North Dakota

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $45 million for Broadband Infrastructure (40% of CPF allocation)

 Locations to Be Served: 3,965 (initial estimate)

 Program Description: Broadband North Dakota, a 

competitive grant program, is designed to address 

the needs of North Dakotans who currently lack 

access to reliable, affordable high-speed internet. 

The program aims to provide sustainable, future-proof connectivity 

to areas in the state lacking connectivity of at least 100/20 Mbps, including tribal lands.

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: North Dakota Information Technology Department

North Dakota Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by North Dakota, 

estimates show that investments 

made using the Capital Projects 

Fund will serve 40% of locations 

still lacking high-speed internet 

access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan totaling $506,300 to Semantic AI,

Inc. (the Company), a business critical to maintaining national security with approximately 51

U.S. employees in March 2020.

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(3) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is secured by all the assets of the Company. It has 

an annual interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% and matures on November 13, 2025. Treasury 

funded the full loan amount at close. The loan proceeds will be used to provide liquidity to 

continue the Company’s operations. The transaction agreement includes covenants by the 

Company to comply with certain restrictions on employee compensation, stock repurchases, 

dividends, and reductions in employment levels, as required by the CARES Act. The loan 

constitutes senior indebtedness of the Company, and Treasury will receive 3% payment-in-kind 

annual interest on the loan in accordance with section 4003(d) of the CARES Act.