alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1953 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1953

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit incarcerated 
           individuals from receiving 2021 recovery rebates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2021

  Mr. Steil (for himself, Mr. Perry, Mr. Gallagher, and Mr. Grothman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit incarcerated 
           individuals from receiving 2021 recovery rebates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer-Funded Checks for 
Prisoners Act''.

SEC. 2. INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS PRECLUDED FROM 2021 RECOVERY REBATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 6428B(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (as added by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021) is amended by 
striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (2), by redesignating 
paragraph (3) as paragraph (4), and by inserting after paragraph (2) 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) any individual who was incarcerated in a Federal 
        prison on the date of the enactment of the American Rescue Plan 
        Act of 2021, and''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of section 9601 of the American 
Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
                                 <all>
```
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7250
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-79-25-N, CA-95-740) Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: May 23, 1997 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams , Nos. CR-79-25-N; CA-95-740 (E.D. Va. July 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.9





 Exhibit 10.9 

Roman DBDR Tech Acquisition Corp. II 

2877 Paradise Road, Unit 702 

Las Vegas, NV 89109 
  

			
	 Roman DBDR Tech Sponsor II LLC
 251 Little Falls
Drive
 Wilmington, DE 19808
	  	October 15, 2021

 LETTER OF AMENDMENT 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made to
that certain “Promissory Note” dated January 21, 2021 made by Roman DBDR Tech Acquisition Corp. II, a Delaware corporation and blank check company (the “Maker”), pursuant to which Maker promises to pay to the order of
Roman DBDR Tech Sponsor II LLC or its registered assigns or successors in interest, or order, the principal sum of up to Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) in lawful money of the United States of America. 

The parties agree that the reference to “September 30, 2021” in each of (i) clause (i) of paragraph 1 and (ii) clause (i)
of paragraph 3 shall be amended and replaced with “September 30, 2022”. The parties also agree that this Letter of Amendment shall have been effective from and as of September 30, 2021. 

[Signature page follows] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker, intending to be legally bound hereby, has caused this
Letter of Amendment to be duly executed by the undersigned as of September 30, 2021. 
  

			
	ROMAN DBDR TECH ACQUISITION CORP. II
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	Dr. Donald Basile
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer


 Accepted and Agreed: 
  

			
	ROMAN DBDR TECH SPONSOR II LLC
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	Dixon Doll, Jr.
	Title:	 	Managing Member

 [Signature Page to Letter of Amendment]
#### James John MONTREUIL v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., et al.

No. 53833.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., and The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 279 So.2d 701.

Application denied. The judgment of the court of appeal is correct.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 27 2002 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JEFFREY WAYNE LEAF,

Defendant - Appellant. No. 01-7073 (D. C. No. 00-CR-78-S) (E.D. Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , Chief Judge, EBEL , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record , this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument wouldnot be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se e Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. This appeal is from an order of the district court sentencing defendant to 18 years of incarceration to be followed by five years of supervised release, after a plea agreement which required the government to fil e an information alleging-2-

second degree murder in Indian Country and use and discharge of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence. On D ecember 12, 2000, defendant Leaf was originally charged in a two count indictme nt with first degree murder in Indian Country and the use and discharge of a firea rm during the commission of a crime of violence. After plea negotiations were en tered into, defendant eventually entered into a written plea agreement un der Fed. R. Crim. P. § 11(e)(1)(C), in which he waived an indictment andagreed to a total sentence of 18 years of incarceration. As required under the p lea agreement, the government filed an information that alleged second degree mur der and use and discharge of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violenc e. Under the terms of the plea agreement, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the charges in the information. The plea agreement mandated a sentenc e of 96 months on the second degree murder charge and 120 months on the f irearms charge. The firearms charge is statutorily required to run cons ecutive to the sentence on the murder count. We have reviewed the entire record on appeal before this court, including the plea agreement and the presentence report. We find no basis on which to determine that an error was made in the district co urt. Defendant’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. State of Califo rnia , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). Defendant’s attorney moves this courtfor leave to withdraw. That-3-

motion is granted. We affirm the order of the dist rict court sentencing defendant pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement. AFFIRMED. ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha Circuit Judge
#### Ronnie CARTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40802.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 5, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 737.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Order entered November 19, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01237-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF E.A.E., E.E.E., AND E.J.E., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 416-55549-2014 

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to issue the 

mandate in this appeal INSTANTER. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE>
                                   Exhibit ll

                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


                                                                        Quarter Ended
                                                          -----------------------------------------
                                                          April 30, 1998             April 30, 1997
                                                          --------------             --------------
<S>                                                      <C>                        <C>
BASIC

Net income                                               $      840,000             $     1,109,000

Weighted average shares outstanding                           4,719,000                   4,786,000
                                                          -------------              --------------

Basic income per common share                            $          .18             $           .23
                                                          =============              ==============



DILUTED

Net income                                               $      840,000             $     1,109,000
Less - net income allocated to subsidiary
    dilutive stock options outstanding                          (22,000)                    (62,000)
                                                          -------------              --------------

Net income used in calculation of diluted
    income per share                                     $      818,000             $     1,047,000
                                                          =============              ==============


Weighted average shares outstanding                           4,719,000                   4,786,000

Plus- common  equivalent  shares  (determined
    using the "treasury stock" method)
    representing shares issuable upon exercise
    of stock options                                            206,000                     307,000
                                                                -------                     -------

Weighted average number of shares used in
    calculation of diluted income per common share            4,925,000                   5,093,000
                                                          =============              ==============


Diluted income per common share                          $          .17             $           .21
                                                          =============              ==============
</TABLE>
**~** "'' ' 

# ...

I. THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 June 19, 2012

The Honorable Kay Bailey Hutchison United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear SenatorHutchison: 'Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by the Abilene Regional Airport for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air Service Development Program. The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of40 gr_ant awards each year, although no more than 4 awards may be to communities in the same State. In orderto provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flex!bility,in the types ofprojects that can be funded. ' 

### ...... 

## !.1

On May 15, the Department issued an orderrequesting**tha~** communities interested in receiving a grantthis year file their applications by June 11. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, Icannotcommentonthe merits ofany particularproposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. As is our normal practice, I DOT-OST-2012-0069 as this pJ."ogram. a copy ofyour letter and this resp de the record ofthis matter. I aCOMMIH!'ES: KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON TEXAS APP!l(lPRI!ITIONS 

# ilnitcd ;otatcs ;ornate

The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary ofTransportation WASHINGTON, DC 20510-4304 

### May 29,2012

United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: RUt.ES J\ND**ADM!N\~)TRATJDt~**



### The Abilene Regional Airport has notified me that 

### it has submitted an application to be considered for funding underthe Small Community Air Service Development

### Grant Program. I 

### ampleased to support the application. lam requestingthe U.S. DepartmentofTransportation to considerthe merits of the proposal and ensure 

### itreceives afair and thorough review during the evaluation process. 

### I have been inf01med that this grant would benefit the community by expanding choice and convenience for airline travelers and contributingto regional economic develepment. Should you have any questions regarding the application, I 

### hope you 

### will not hesitate to contact Lucas Szabo in my office for additienal information.
Sincerely,

KBH/ls



### S10-120604-D10**Wob~http://hU!chison.senato.gov**
Exhibit 32.3.1



Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, John D. McMahon, the Chief Executive Officer of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (the Company) certify that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, which this statement accompanies, (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    JOHN D. MCMAHONJohn D. McMahon




Dated: August 3, 2004
**~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~---------------------.**



### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC 

## 19 20!6
) ) ) ) ) 

# d-01 Lo- 

# 4cJ In the matterof:


### AERO TECH, LLC.



# _______) FAA Docket No. CP-Judge Douglas M. Rawald Case No. 2015WA910115



### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I. Stephen Doerr, Esq., do hereby certify that on the 141h day of September, 2016, one (1) original and one (1) copy of: Aero Tech, LLC's First interrogatories and Requestfor Production to Federal Aviation Administration
was sentvia First-Class Mail, to the following: Kyle Lomazow, 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel Attn. Patricia L. Baysinger Enforcement Division, Western Team 222 West 71 h Avenue Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587



### 1 Steph n r, Esq. Respondents Counsel Doerr 

### &Knudson, P.A. 212 

### W. First Street Portales, NM 88130 (T) 575-359-1289 (F) 575-359-1898
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Oct - Dec

2017 Actual 204 282 (8) 274 70 229 (12)

Jan - Mar

2018 Actual 374 488 (54) 435 61 290 (30)

Apr - Jun

2018 Actual (43) 72 (72) 0 43 333 (48)

Jul - Sep

2018 Actual 212 353 (89) 264 52 385 (66)

Oct - Dec

2018 Actual 291 426 (117) 309 17 402 (91)

Jan - Mar

2019 Actual 375 374 (67) 306 (68) 334 (46)

Apr - Jun

2019 Actual 13 40 (97) (57) (70) 264 (67)

Jul - Sep

2019 Actual 281 440 (40) 400 119 382 (30)

Oct - Dec

2019 Actual 313 330 7 337 24 404 0

Jan - Mar

2020 Actual 365 477 (1) 476 111 515 0

Apr - Jun

2020 Actual 1,526 2,753 (20) 2,733 1207 1722 0

Jul - Sep

2020 Actual 401 454 7 461 60 1782 0

Oct - Dec

2020 Actual 648 597 (3) 595 (53) 1729 0

Jan - Mar

2021 Actual 1008 401 1 402 607 1122 0

Apr - Jun

2021 Actual 591 319 2 321 (270) 852 0

Jul - Sep

2021 Actual 751 103 11 115 (637) 215 0

Oct - Dec

2021 Actual 480 689 (18) 670 191 406 0

Jan - Mar

2022 Actual 423 668 1 669 245 652 0

Apr - Jun

2022 Actual (180) 7 (55) (49) 131 782 (30)

Jul - Sep

2022 Actual 453 457 (151) 307 (146) 636 (120)

Oct - Dec

2022 Actual 368 373 (194) 179 (189) 447 (139)

Jan - Mar January 30, 2023 609 932 (270) 662 53 500 (221)

2023 Actual 656 657 (270) 387 (269) 178 (221)

Forecast Revisions 47 (275) (1) (275) (322) (322) 0

Apr - Jun January 30, 2023 (5) 278 (233) 45 50 550 (180)

2023 May 1, 2023 112 726 (242) 485 372 550 (180)

Forecast Revisions 117 449 (9) 440 322 0 (0)

Jul - Sep

2023 May 1, 2023 438 733 (244) 488 50 600 (158)

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 
|   | /s/   Thomas M. Petro                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas   M. Petro                       |
|   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                    |
|   | /s/   Roger S. Deacon                   |
|   | Roger   S. Deacon                       |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer               |

 

Date: March 14, 2011

 

----
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2012

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/29 1/3 1/5 20.00 26.00 27.00 80.00 -7.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 1/5 1/9 1/12 25.00 30.00 29.00 26.00 99.00 11.00

1/12 1/17 1/19 30.00 33.00 31.00 75.00 19.00

1/19 1/23 1/26 35.00 33.00 31.00 73.00 26.00

1/26 1/30 2/2 40.00 33.00 31.00 73.00 31.00

2/2 2/6 2/9 40.00 33.00 31.00 27.00 103.00 28.00

2/9 2/13 2/16 40.00 33.00 31.00 86.00 18.00

2/16 2/21 2/23 40.00 33.00 31.00 91.00 13.00

2/23 2/27 3/1 40.00 33.00 31.00 96.00 8.00

3/1 3/5 3/8 40.00 33.00 31.00 27.00 118.00 13.00

3/8 3/12 3/15 40.00 33.00 31.00 94.00 10.00

3/15 3/19 3/22 40.00 33.00 31.00 93.00 11.00

3/22 3/26 3/29 40.00 33.00 31.00 93.00 11.00

1366.00 1174.00 192.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

62-DAY BILL 2/13 2/16 40.00 40.00

Matures 4/19

62-DAY BILL 2/21 2/23 40.00 40.00

Matures 4/26

25-DAY BILL 3/22 3/26 15.00 15.00

Matures 4/19

CMB Funds: CMB Funds: 95 00 .

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

3-year Note 1/5 1/10 1/17 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 1/5 1/11 1/17 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 1/5 1/12 1/17 13.00 0.00 35.20 30.80

10-year TIPS 1/12 1/19 1/31 13.00 0.00

2-year Note 1/19 1/24 1/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 1/19 1/25 1/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 1/19 1/26 1/31 29.00 0.00 56.77 55.23

3-year Note 2/1 2/7 2/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note 2/1 2/8 2/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 2/1 2/9 2/15 16.00 0.00 49.63 22.37

30-year TIPS 2/9 2/16 2/29 9.00 0.00

2-year Note 2/16 2/21 2/29 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 2/16 2/22 2/29 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 2/16 2/23 2/29 29.00 0.00 56.01 51.99

3-year Note 3/1 3/6 3/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 3/1 3/7 3/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Note ® 3/1 3/8 3/15 13.00 0.00 24.38 41.62

10-year TIPS ® 3/15 3/22 3/30 11.00 0.00

2-year Note 3/22 3/27 4/2 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 3/22 3/28 4/2 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 3/22 3/29 4/2 29.00 0.00 57.86 52.14

534.00 279.84 254.16

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 541.16