alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31057]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,817]


AMEX Manufacturing Incorporated, El Paso, Texas, Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on September 15, 1997 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed August 18, 1997 on behalf of workers at AMEX 
Manufacturing Incorporated located in El Paso, Texas (TA-W-33,817).
    The petitioning group of workers are covered under an existing 
Trade Adjustment Assistance certification (TA-W-32,431). Consequently, 
further investigation in this case would service no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 10th day of November 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-31057 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
SMW0422

SMW0423

SMW0424

SMW0425

SMW0426

SMW0427

SMW0428

SMW0429

SMW0430
#### Lee PINKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-653.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 1974.

*56Lee Pinkins, pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

MANN, Chief Judge.

It is often said that every citizen is entitled to his day in court. That is an understatement. Every citizen is entitled to *two*days in court. Under Article V of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A., an appeal as of right may be taken from every judgment. Lee Pinkins is no exception. Pinkins has a *right*of appeal. Pinkins’ problem is that he has no *grounds*for appeal.

In our earlier order, Pinkins v. Wainwright, Fla.App.2d 1973, 283 So.2d 577, we acknowledged that the petition filed herein seeking delayed appellate review under Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239 was well taken in that the trial court had indeed failed to advise Pinkins of his right to appeal and that he had been deprived of that right through state action. We pointed out in that opinion, however, that the same documents on which that determination was made disclosed that all of Pinkins’ constitutional rights had been respected in the reception of his plea of guilty. Consequently, we granted the writ of habeas corpus and simultaneously issued a rule to show cause why the appeal thus initiated on Pinkins’ behalf should not be dismissed as frivolous. The Public Defender for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit filed a brief asserting that there was indeed no arguable merit in Pinkins’ appeal. Now we have a document filed by Pinkins himself, in accordance with our order allowing him ample time to do so, which reiterates his *right*to an appeal. We hope that this opinion makes it plain that Pink-ins has a right of appeal, that we have acknowledged it and that this appeal is it. We are, however, dismissing Pinkins’ appeal as being totally without merit because the record conclusively establishes that he has no grounds whatever for reversal of his conviction. *See,*Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.2d 1969, 228 So.2d 446.

No good cause having been shown why the appeal should not be dismissed as frivolous, the rule to show cause is made absolute and this appeal stands dismissed.

McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2







PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.








Date: June 29, 2010








/s/ Brian Lee


Brian Lee


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
# October 2008 - November 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 208 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 208

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 500 West Main Street, Suite 102 in Tupelo, Mississippi, as the 
            ``Colonel Carlyle `Smitty' Harris Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLONEL CARLYLE ``SMITTY'' HARRIS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 500 West Main Street, Suite 102 in Tupelo, Mississippi, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Colonel Carlyle `Smitty' Harris 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
Carlyle `Smitty' Harris Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 23, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 208

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 500 West Main Street, Suite 102 in Tupelo, Mississippi, as the 
            ``Colonel Carlyle `Smitty' Harris Post Office''.
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,MICHAEL J. SHEA, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMPUTER HORIZONSCORP.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects, thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

 

 
| Date:                   | November 9, 2004 |   |   |
|-------------------------|------------------|--------|--------|
|                    |             |   |
| /s/ Michael J. Shea     |             |   |
| MICHAEL J. SHEA         |             |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |             |   |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

OSCAR ARMANDO ROMERO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-10093 

D.C. No. 3:19-cr-00086-WHO-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William H. Orrick, III, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 2, 2020**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Oscar Armando Romero appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(B). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 8 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-10093 

Romero contends that the district court erred when it imposed a two-level 

adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) for being a minor participant, instead of a 

four-level adjustment for being a minimal participant under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(a).

We review the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, its factual 

findings for clear error, and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse 

of discretion. See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 

2017) (en banc). 

The district court applied the correct legal standard in denying the minimal 

role reduction. The standard was discussed in the parties’ sentencing memoranda 

and again at sentencing, and the district court showed its knowledge of the 

applicable standards when it determined that a minor role adjustment, rather than a 

minimal role adjustment, was warranted. Moreover, the district court did not abuse 

its discretion in determining that, while Romero played a minor role in the offense, 

he was not “plainly among the least culpable of those involved in the conduct of 

[the] group.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.4. As the district court observed, the large 

quantity of drugs Romero was tasked with delivering and his language during a 

call with the confidential informant suggested that he was not a minimal 

participant. Contrary to Romero’s argument, the district court did not deny the 

minimal role reduction solely on the basis of drug quantity, and its consideration of 

that factor was not erroneous. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C) (list of factors 
3 20-10093 

district court must consider to determine mitigating role adjustment is “nonexhaustive” and final determination “is heavily dependent upon the facts of the 

particular case”); United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1193 (9th Cir. 

2011) (district court was “justifiably skeptical that this amount of drugs would be 

entrusted to a minor player”).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT23.5




CONSENT OF MICHAEL KOCIUMBAS, AND
 WATTS, GRIFFIS AND MCOUAT LIMITED
 
 
 Alderon Iron Ore Corp.
 United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 Dear Sirs:
 
 RE: ALDERON IRON ORE CORP.
 
 I, Michael Kociumbas, P.Geo., Senior Geologist and Vice-President of Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited, do hereby consent to filing of the following report.
 
 Reference is made to the technical report entitled “Feasibility Study of the Rose Deposit and Resource Estimate for the Mills Lake Deposit of the Kamistiatusset (Kami) Iron Ore Property, Labrador for Alderon Iron Ore Corp.”dated effective December 17, 2012, which the undersigned has co-authored on behalf of Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited for Alderon Iron Ore Corp. (the “Technical Report”).
 
 I, on behalf of myself and on behalf of Watts, Griffis and McOuat, hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and the name of Watts, Griffis and McOuat and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Alderon Iron Ore Corp., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 Dated this 22ndday of March, 2013.
 
 
 
 
 
 "Michael Kociumbas"Michael Kociumbas, P.Geo.
 
  WATTS, GRIFFIS AND McOUAT LIMITEDSUITE 400 - 8 KING STREET EAST, TORONTO, CANADA, M5C 1B5
 tel: (416) 364-6244    fax: (416) 864-1675    email: info@wgm.ca    web: www.wgm.ca
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard
N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


November 13, 2006

/s/ Howard N. Feist III
-----------------------
Howard N. Feist III
Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 15, 2011 

p0608 

Order 

 

June 15, 2011 

142429 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142429 

 COA: 294020 

Kent CC: 08-010820-FH 

DAVID CROCKETT SIMS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 23, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Loncor Resources Inc.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Arnold T. Kondrat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)     The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

| | March 30, 2016 | /s/
      Arnold T. Kondrat        
| | -------------- | -----------------------------------
| |                |                                    
| |                | Arnold T. Kondrat                  
| |                | President & Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Loncor Resources Inc. and will be retained by Loncor
Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
                                 
                       Congoleum Corporation
              Computation of Income Per Common Share
         (Amounts in thousands, except earnings per share)

<CAPTION>

                                               Three Months Ended
                                                   March 31,
Primary Earnings Per Common Share:             1997         1996
----------------------------------             ------------------- 

<S>                                            <C>        <C>
Income per common and common equivalent
  share                                        $ 1,013    $(1,044)
                                               --------   --------

Weighted average common shares outstanding       9,997     10,000
                                         
Effect of assumed exercise of dilutive
  stock options (1)                                 38         --
                                               --------   --------          
Weighted average common and common 
  equivalent shares                             10,035     10,000
                                               ========   ========          
Income per common and common equivalent
  share                                        $  0.10    $ (0.10)
                                               ========   ========         
                                                         
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share                  
---------------------------------------                                        
Income per common and common equivalent
  share                                        $ 1,013    $(1,044)
                                               ========   ========
                                                       
Weighted average common shares outstanding       9,997     10,000
                                                         
Effect of assumed exercise of dilutive
  stock options (1)                                 38         --
                                               --------   --------
                                                         
Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares                             10,035     10,000
                                               ========   ======== 

                                                         
Income per common and common equivalent     
  share                                        $  0.10    $ (0.10)
                                               ========   ========

</TABLE>

(1)   Computed based on the treasury stock method.

                                     13

<PAGE>
#### WHISPERING PINES LAKE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. Paul DEMOSTHENIS and Stella Demosthenes, a/k/a Stella Demosthenis, his wife, Respondents.

No. 78-297.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 22, 1978.

Richard F. Hayes, Coral Gables, for petitioner.

Paul Demosthenis and Stella Demosthen-is, in pro. per.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari filed by Whispering Pines Lake association is granted, the order under review is quashed, and the cause is remanded to the circúit court below with directions to (1) reverse the final judgment entered in the county court herein; and (2) order a new trial in the instant county court action. In our view, the circuit court departed from essential requirements of law in affirming the county court judgment because there is no evidence in the record upon which the county court could have directed a verdict at the trial of this cause in favor of the respondents Paul and Stella Demosthenis. See: *Cohen v. State,*99 So.2d 563, 565 (Fla.1957); *Hagan v. Sabal Palms, Inc.,*186 So.2d 302, 310 (Fla.2d DCA 1966); *Newman v. State,*174 So.2d 479, 481 (Fla.2d DCA 1965).
**Exhibit 21.1**

**EXCEL TRUST, INC. SUBSIDIARIES**

 

 

Excel Barbourville, LLC a Delaware limitedliability company 

Excel Beckley, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Brandywine, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Centre Partners, LLC aCalifornia limited liability company 

Excel Dothan, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Foxwood, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Gilroy LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Hulen, LLC a Delaware limitedliability company 

Excel Jewel, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Milledgeville, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Missoula, LLC a Delawarelimited liability company 

Excel Newport, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel North Corbin, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Princeton, LLC a Delawarelimited liability company 

Excel Red Boulder, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Rockwall, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Rosewick, LLC a Delaware limitedliability company 

Excel San Marcos LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Shippensburg, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel South Corbin, LLC a Delawarelimited liability company 

Excel St. Marys, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Stockton, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Excel Trust, Inc., a Maryland limitedliability company 

Excel Trust, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership 

Excel TRS. Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Excel Twin Oaks, LLC a Delaware limited liability company

Excel Vestavia, LLC a Delaware limited liability company 

Five Forks GS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company