My daughter’s physical condition is as follows: she is a wheelchair user with multiple disabilities who

cannot sit unsupported, weighs approximately 55 lbs, and needs to fly for medical care. As a result of her physical condition, she needs the support and security provided by an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but
because of her weight is incapable of compliance with the regulation.

I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenge r by ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency condi tions.

I propose that Hannah Henry be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation), even though she exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for Hannah and a high level o f safety for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in Hannah’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight.

Enhancing safety for Hannah is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System allows her to use commercial air transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restra int System, she would be unable to fly commercially.

I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restrai nt has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrity if used by someone who weighed se veral hundred pounds.

I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this might cause a higher HIC lo ad for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would mean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Hannah only sits in a passenger seat with no passenger seat ed behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind
Hannah while she is using the CARES restraint. I also propose that all operations under this exemption
be conducted with at least one of Hannah’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him or her. In addition, I propose that Hannah’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption.

I also request that the processing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in the Federal Register. We want to trave l in March for a stem cell transplant . If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may not be able to travel in this timeframe.If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the followi ng:

This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without th e support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. We request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AMSAFE INC.), even though she exceeds the
manufac turer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide for her during the flight.