alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000072741
<NAME> NORTHEAST UTILITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    6,110,287
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    891,645
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,067,485
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,279,109
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,348,526
<COMMON>                                       686,188
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      940,448
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            579,449
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,073,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          141,039
<PREFERRED>                                    136,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         3,151,013
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             258,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  156,982
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       46,250
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     79,628
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               120,258
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               4,053,071
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               10,348,526
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,081,976
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            35,108
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,880,299
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,935,846
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        146,130
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (3,047)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 163,522
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       132,969
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,553
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     11,881
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   18,672
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         428,447
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31871]



[[Page 64408]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Regulatory Guides; Availability

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has updated the Regulatory Guide 
List to advise of the wide range of regulatory guides that are 
available and to list all published versions of each guide. The 
Regulatory Guide Series has been developed to describe and make 
available to the public such information as methods acceptable to the 
NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the Commission's 
regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific 
problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the staff in its 
review of applications for permits and licenses.
    Single copies of the Regulatory Guide List may be obtained free of 
charge by writing the Information Management Division, Attention: 
Printing, Graphics and Distribution Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; or by fax at (301) 415-5272. 
Single copies of regulatory guides, both final and draft guides, may 
also be obtained free of charge at this address.
    Regulatory guides may also be purchased from the National Technical 
Information Service on a standing order basis. Details on this service 
may be obtained by writing NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 
22161. Comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion 
in guides currently being developed or improvements in all published 
guides are encouraged at any time. Written comments may be submitted to 
the Rules and Directives Branch, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
    Regulatory guides and the list of guides are available for 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW., 
Washington, DC. Regulatory guides are not copyrighted, and Commission 
approval is not required to reproduce them.

(5 U.S.C. 552(a))

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of November 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph A. Murphy,
Director, Division of Regulatory Applications, Office of Nuclear 
Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 97-31871 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this annual report of Advanced Pipe Fitting Technologies, Inc the "Company" on Form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yanzhang Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Yanzhang LiYanzhang LiChief Executive OfficerJanuary 28, 2011
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30898 Summary Calendar

TERRY J. DORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MOVABLE PLATFORMS, INC., ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1315 E

- - - - - - - - - - August 29, 1997 Before REAVLEY, KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * Terry J. Dore has appealed the district court’s refusal to order a new trial in his Jones Act case. Dore contends that the district court erred in permitting defense counsel to exhibit to the jury poster-sized enlargements of job descriptions contained in the occupational titles handbook, which were not in evidence. Dore contends that he was prejudiced because the trial court had excluded testimony by his vocational expert and he was not able to rebut defendant’s argument.No. 96-30898 - 2 - The district court’s refusal to grant a new trial is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Maldonado v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. , 798 F.2d 764, 771 (5th Cir. 1986). “When counsel for either party makes an improper statement during trial, this court must determine whether the remark impaired a substantial right of the objecting party.” Winter v. Brenner Tank, Inc. , 926 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). To warrant a new trial, counsel’s misconduct must be so pronounced and persistent that it permeates the entire proceeding. Id. Dore failed to object to the demonstrative aids and to counsel’s closing argument and did not move the trial court for a mistrial. See id. (failure to move for mistrial suggests that any lingering prejudice was minimal) (citing United States v. Diaz-Carreon , 915 F.2d 951, 959 (5th Cir. 1990)); see also Maldonado , 798 F.2d at 771 (litigant’s failure to move for a mistrial may be a factor favoring affirmance). The trial court instructed the jury that it should decide the case on the evidence. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial.
AFFIRMED.
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

FDMSDocketNo.FAA-~IO:- /OYd.-

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

Air Transport Association Joe White ~/2'/lo,c

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
08/01/2012 10:13 FAX 2024835142 FAA -. OMS 

U.S. DEPARTtv1ENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASlllNGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Heloair, Inc. 

2011EA210081 

Judge Not Assigned 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

~008/010 

... l 

f 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States Department 

of Transportation, Office ofHearings, and the Respondent, pursuantto 14 C.F.R. §13.204(b), 

that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All 

communications, notices, pleadings, or docmnents are respectfully requested to be fOIWarded 

as follows:: 

Zachary M. Bennan 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 A vi arion Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3258 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, . 

Alfred R Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

Zachary ·~a~)}-. MBe an 

Attorney 
06/01/2012 10:13 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS 141010/010 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance were placed in 

the United States mail. postage prepaid, Certified Mail - Return. Receipt Requested. addressed 

as follows: 

Whit Baldwin 

President 

Heloair, Inc. 

5721 Gulfstream Road 

Richmond, VA 23250 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Date: MAY l 7 2012 

/') 

I/,~· ~~~~~ .~ t.:. ~s Paralegal Specialist 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
|   |                                                                                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|   |
|--------|
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | September 13, 2019 |   | /s/ Kevin J. Lynch |
|   |   |   | Kevin J. Lynch |
|   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | September 13, 2019 |   | /s/ John M. Fields, Jr. |
|   |   |   | John M. Fields, Jr. |
|   |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Wyoming Sulfate Contribution to Mount Zirkel

Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

MOZI1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 21 WY 0.0416381 0 0.0016381 0.0011667 0.0033905 0.0478333

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Sulfate at Mount Zirkel = 0.05 divided by 0.7, or 7%

Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

MOZI1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 20 WY 0.06742 5.00E-05 0.001805 0.0003 0.00413 0.073705

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Sulfate at Mount Zirkel = 0.07 divided by 0.6, or 12%
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0320

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

ETTA KOEHLER DOUBEK,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 24, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 16 2020

03/16/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0320
#### Jay WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. The FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION and Cornelius L. Reagan, Respondents.

No. P-249.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 27, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Petition dismissed.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 14, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-00782-CV
2015 ACQUISITIONS 5, L.L.C., Appellant V. DISSOLUTION COMMITTEE FOR THE BOARD OF DALLAS COUNTY SCHOOLS TRUSTEES, Appellee
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-04952



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant informs
the Court that the parties have s ettled their dispute. Accordi ngly, we grant the motion and dismiss
the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

180782F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

2015 ACQUISITIONS 5, L.L.C., Appellant

No. 05-18-00782-CV V.

DISSOLUTION COMMITTEE FOR THE BOARD OF DALLAS COUNTY SCHOOLS TRUSTEES, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-04952. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee DISSOLUTION COMMITTEE FOR THE BOAR D OF DALLAS COUNTY SCHOOLS TRUSTEES recover its costs of t his appeal from appellant 2015 A CQUISITIONS 5, L.L.C.

Judgment entered September 14, 2018.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31849]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending November 28, 1997

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
Application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
Applications by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of 
the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in 
appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-96-1642.
    Date Filed: November 28, 1997.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: December 26, 1997.
    Description: Application of Continental Airlines, Inc., pursuant to 
49 U.S.C. Section 41102 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, applies for 
renewal of its Route 729 authority between Cleveland, Ohio and London 
Gatwick, England and the right to integrate its Route 729 authority 
with Continental's certificate and exemption authority to serve other 
points.
Paulette V. Twine,
Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-31849 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Oct - Dec

2007 Actual 91 87 (14) 73 (18) 57

Jan - Mar

2008 Actual 187 191 (15) 176 (11) 46

Apr - Jun

2008 Actual (74) (45) (22) (66) 7 53

Jul - Sep

2008 Actual 179 527 (30) 497 318 372

Oct - Dec

2008 Actual 556 569 (18) 551 (5) 367

Jan - Mar

2009 Actual 565 481 (14) 467 (98) 269

Apr - Jun

2009 Actual 278 343 (17) 327 49 318

Jul - Sep

2009 Actual 415 393 (20) 372 (43) 275

Oct - Dec

2009 Actual 340 260 (3) 258 (82) 194

Jan - Mar

2010 Actual 446 483 (12) 471 25 219

Apr - Jun

2010 Actual 263 344 (10) 334 71 290

Jul - Sep

2010 Actual 362 396 (14) 382 20 310

Oct - Dec

2010 Actual 326 363 (4) 359 33 343

Jan - Mar

2011 Actual 470 265 (20) 245 (225) 118

Apr - Jun

2011 Actual 149 190 (22) 167 19 137

Jul - Sep

2011 Actual 342 286 (23) 264 (79) 58

Oct - Dec October 31, 2011 301 305 (2) 303 2 60

2011 Actual 284 310 2 312 28 86

Memo: Forecast Revision (17) 5 4 8 26 26

Jan - Mar October 31, 2011 530 541 (12) 530 0 60

2012 January 30, 2012 483 444 (17) 427 (56) 30

Memo: Forecast Revision (47) (97) (6) (103) (56) (30)

Apr - Jun

2012 January 30, 2012 123 200 (17) 183 60 90

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID JONATHAN THOMAS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. ISIDRO BACA; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 16572 D.C. No. 3:13

- cv - 00508

- RCJ

WGC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 14, 2016 ** Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. David Jonathan Thomas, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLU IPA”) alleging that defendants ’ refusal to provide him with a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 16572

kosher food diet violated the free exercise clause of the First Amendment and
RLUIPA . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

. Albino v. Baca , 747 F.3d 1162, 1168, 117 1 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc). We reverse
and remand. The district court erred in granting judgment for defendants , because defendants failed to meet their burden of demonstrating that grievance No. 2006

- 29

- 42178 was properly screened under existing prison regulations. See id. at 1172 (defendant bears the burden of proving that the prisoner did not exhaust available administrative remedies)

. Defendants did not produce evidence showing that Thomas was required to attach prior level grievance responses to h is next level grievances

. See Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. 199, 218 (2007) (compliance with prison grievance procedures is all that is required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) to properly exhaust). Moreover, grievance No. 2006

- 29

- 42178 was sufficient to put the prison on notice of Thomas’ claims. See Wilkerson v.
Wheeler , 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (“[W] hen the administrative rulebook is silent, a grievance suffices if it alerts the prison to the nature of the wrong for which redress is sought .” (citation omitted)); Sapp v. Kimbrell , 623 F.3d 813, 824 (9th Cir. 2010) (the PLRA does not “ require an inmate to identify responsible3 15

- 16572

parties or otherwise to si gnal who ultimately may be sued”). Acco rdingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
We do not consider allegations and arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
#### Elijah WEBSTER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-310.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 17, 1970.

Elijah Webster, Jr., in pro per.

Ea'rl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Webster v. State, 156 So.2d 890 (Fla.App.1963); House v. State, 199 So.2d 134 (Fla.App.1967); and Rankin v. State, 168 So.2d 324 (Fla.App.1964).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
July 15this Child Tax Credit Day! Child Tax CreditDay!

HOWTO MAKE SURE YOUR

FAMILYGETS THE EXPANDED

CHILDTAXCREDIT

U.S.Dept ofthe Treasury
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The American Rescue Plan expanded

the credit to get more help to families.

TheAmericanRescue Plan expanded

the creditto get more help to families.

The expanded Child Tax Credit

sends mostfamilies up to:

- $3,600/child under age 6

- $3,000/child age 6 through 17

This expansioncanhelp cut

child poverty inhalf +

New Monthly Paymentshelp families

budget for the rest of the year

U.S.Dept ofthe Treasury
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HowTo Get the Child Tax Credit Payments if:

If you listchild dependents on yourtax return

+ filed an income tax return forthis year orlast year:

Youwill AUTOMATICALLY receive the

Child Tax Credit Payments.

U.S.Dept ofthe Treasury
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HowTo Get the Child Tax Credit Payments if:

Yourfamily needsto use the online IRSNon-filer

Sign-up Tool. You'll provide a little bit of

information and then sign up to receive

Child Tax Credit payments.

U.S.Dept ofthe Treasury
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You Need to Update Bank or

Tax Info?

HowTo Get the Child Tax Credit Payments if:

You Need toUpdateBank or

Tax Info?

The IRS moved quickly to launch a

Child Tax CreditUpdate Portal

within months ofthe American Rescue Plan’s

passage. The portal allowstaxpayersto opt out of

advance payments and to add new

bank accountinformation.

U.S.Dept ofthe Treasury
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All of the Resources you need to

make sure your family gets the

Child Tax Credit can be found at

All of the Resources you need to

make sure your family gets the

Child Tax Credit can be found at

ChildTaxCredit.Gov

U.S.Dept ofthe Treasury
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter SOMA

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance Redemptions

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6) (7)

Oct - Dec

2017 Actual 204 282 (8) 274 70 229 (12)

Jan - Mar

2018 Actual 374 488 (54) 435 61 290 (30)

Apr - Jun

2018 Actual (43) 72 (72) 0 43 333 (48)

Jul - Sep

2018 Actual 212 353 (89) 264 52 385 (66)

Oct - Dec

2018 Actual 291 426 (117) 309 17 402 (91)

Jan - Mar

2019 Actual 375 374 (67) 306 (68) 334 (46)

Apr - Jun

2019 Actual 13 40 (97) (57) (70) 264 (67)

Jul - Sep

2019 Actual 281 440 (40) 400 119 382 (30)

Oct - Dec

2019 Actual 313 330 7 337 24 404 0

Jan - Mar

2020 Actual 365 477 (1) 476 111 515 0

Apr - Jun

2020 Actual 1,526 2,753 (20) 2,733 1207 1722 0

Jul - Sep

2020 Actual 401 454 7 461 60 1782 0

Oct - Dec

2020 Actual 648 597 (3) 595 (53) 1729 0

Jan - Mar

2021 Actual 1008 401 1 402 607 1122 0

Apr - Jun

2021 Actual 591 319 2 321 (270) 852 0

Jul - Sep

2021 Actual 751 103 11 115 (637) 215 0

Oct - Dec November 1, 2021 556 1015 (24) 991 435 650 0

2021 Actual 480 689 (18) 670 191 406 0

Forecast Revisions (76) (326) 6 (320) (244) (244) 0

Jan - Mar November 1, 2021 465 476 (11) 465 (0) 650 0

2022 January 31, 2022 486 729 0 730 244 650 0

Forecast Revisions 21 254 11 265 244 0 0

Apr - Jun

2022 January 31, 2022 9 66 (7) 59 50 700 0

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing