alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.4





CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the "Trust") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Rostowsky, Chief Financial Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: March 30, 2012








/s/ STEVEN ROSTOWSKYSteven RostowskyChief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JANINE KOTOCAVAGE

, Appellant,

v.

PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 1546

[ March 2, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fift eenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Paige Hard y Gillman ; L.T. Case No.

502020CA007558XXXXMB

.

Chelsea T. Silvia and Mark Packo of GED Lawyers, LLP, Boca Raton,

for appellant.

Edward G. Guedes of Weiss Ser o to Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Coral

Gables, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C ONNER an d A RTAU

, JJ

. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Arthur JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-410.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 30, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and Edwin T. Mulock, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and P. A. Pacyna, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

On November 28, 1969, appellant Arthur Johnson was informed against in the Pinellas County Circuit Court for the offense of wilful arson of an unoccupied dwelling house. He pleaded not guilty on December 5, 1969, and on January 7, 1970 was tried by a jury, resulting in a verdict of guilty as charged. Motion for new trial being denied, he was adjudged guilty of said offense on February 20, 1970, and on the same date was sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment in the State Prison.

On May 5, 1970 Johnson filed in the trial Court his motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence aforesaid under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A., which motion the trial Judge denied without evidentiary hearing. We agree and affirm.

*334The motion under the post-conviction Rule alleged only matters which went to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict and also complaints of certain trial incidents and the tactics of his defense trial counsel, in none of which we find substantial merit.

Having thoroughly examined the transcript of record before us, and having considered the briefs filed herein, we are unable to find reversible error. The order appealed is therefore—

Affirmed.

HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
#### Frederick J. ACOSTA, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 40343.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1971.

Appeal dismissed. 240 So.2d 218.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Annual Report of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the “company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Date: March 16, 2017/s/ Brian LeeBrian LeeChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


       CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cox
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I,
Jimmy W. Hayes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/ Jimmy W. Hayes
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Jimmy W. Hayes
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                             Date:  May 7, 2003
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors


Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com








July 29, 2010








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors


ePhoto Image, Inc.


Shunyi County, Beijing, China





To Whom It May Concern:





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report under the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed by ePhoto Image, Inc. of our report dated July 28, 2010, relating to the financial statements of ePhoto Image, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the periods ending April 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from September 30, 2007 (date of inception) to April 30, 2010.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
Exhibit 10.31



Following is a summary of the compensation arrangement between Northeast Utilities and the members of its Board of Trustees.



Each Trustee who is not an employee of Northeast Utilities or its subsidiaries receives an annual retainer.  The Lead Trustee and the Chairs of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Affairs, Corporate Governance and Finance Committees receive additional annual retainers.  All retainers are payable quarterly.  The following table sets forth the amounts of the retainers for 2006:



| |                                          |         
| | ---------------------------------------- | --------
| |                                          | 2006    
| | Trustees                                 | $45,000 
| | Lead Trustee                             | $50,000 
| | Audit Committee Chair                    | $20,000 
| | Compensation Committee Chair             | $15,000 
| | Corporate Responsibility Committee Chair | $  7,500
| | Corporate Governance Committee Chair     | $  7,500
| | Finance Committee Chair                  | $10,000 



One-half of the value of the retainers to the Chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committees is payable in the form of common shares of NU.

For 2006, non-employee Trustees received $1,500 for each meeting of the full Board and $1,250 for each Committee meeting through March 7, 2006, regardless of whether attendance was in person or by conference telephone.  Subsequent to March 7, 2006, Trustees will receive $1,500 for each Board meeting and each Committee meeting attended, regardless of whether attendance is in person or by conference telephone.

A non-employee Trustee who is asked by either the Board of Trustees or the Chairman of the Board to perform extra Board-related services in the interest of the Northeast Utilities System may receive additional compensation of $750 per half-day plus necessary expenses.  In addition, when the spouses of Trustees are invited to attend functions of the Board, the Company pays for the travel-related expenses of the spouses that attend such functions.  The payment of a Trustee's spousal expenses is considered imputed income to the individual Trustee and the Company makes a gross-up payment to each such Trustee to cover the tax liability for the imputed income associated with such spousal expenses.

In January 2006, each non-employee Trustee was granted 3,000 restricted share units (RSU) under the Incentive Plan.  Each RSU has the value of one common share of the company.    If a Trustee leaves the Board prior to January 10, 2007, such Trustee will forfeit a pro rata portion of these units.  Absent such forfeiture, and subject to any deferral election in effect, half of these units will be paid as newly-issued shares in January 2007 and half will be paid as newly-issued shares as of the earlier of January 10, 2011, the departure from the Board of Trustees for any reason, Change of Control, death or disability.
### TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin , ERG

DATE: September 30

, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate

Receiving Water Model [DCN SE04590 ]

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model , developed as part of the Environmental Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA

- 821

- R

- 15

- 006 (DCN SE04527) . The supporting documentation for this model includes the files listed in Table 1.

Ta ble 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment ID Document Name Brief Description

A1 Attachment 1: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option A (CCR)

- DCN SE04590A1 CBI_Database used to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option A specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental Justice calculation d atabases. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A2 Attachment 2 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option B (CCR)

- DCN SE04590A2 CBI_Database used to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option B specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental Justice calculation databases. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A3 Attachment 3 : CBI_Final Ste am EA IRW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option C (CCR)

- DCN SE04590A3 CBI_Database used to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option C specifically for the cohorts used in the Envi ronmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental Justice calculation databases. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A4 Attachment 4 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Data base for EJ Cohorts

- Option D (CCR)

- DCN SE04590A4 CBI_Database used to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option D specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generate s inputs for the Environmental Justice calculation databases. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.A 5 Attachment 5 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database for EJ Cohorts

- Option E (CCR)

- DCN SE04590A5 CBI_Database use d to compare the human health module results between baseline and Option E specifically for the cohorts used in the Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race population cohorts). Generates inputs for the Environmental Justice calculation databases. This

v ersion accounts for the CCR rulemaking.
#### Charles M. McCALLUM and Mary Helen McCallum, Appellants, v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and Alachua County and First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Gainesville, Appellees.

No. O-325.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 16, 1971.

Richard T. Jones, Gainesville, for appellants.

Jenkins & Williams, Gainesville, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed1 and the appeal dismissed as required by Rule 4.2(c), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

1

. Investors Syndicate of America, Inc. v. Dade County (Fla.App.1957), 98 So.2d 889; Seaboard All-Florida Ry. v. Leavitt, 105 Fla. 600, 141 So. 886.
12/2/2021 12/3/2021 12/6/2021 12/7/2021 12/8/2021

Treasury Bills Net -27,008 0 0 50,002 0

Treasury Notes Net -2 0 0 0 0

Treasury Bonds Net 0 0 25 0 0

Marketable Inflation Compensation 0 0 0 0 0

Marketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment 454 454 1,364 453 455

Total Marketable Activity -26,556 453 1,389 50,454 455

Airport and Airway Trust Fund -1,554 0 0 0 638

Civil Service Retirement and Disability Trust Fund -2 -66 0 -2 -5

Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund 75 0 11 655 -2

Department of Defense Medicare Eligible Retiree Fund 0 -252 -86 -17 -22

Employees' Health Benefits Fund -67 -126 -107 -612 -252

Employees' Life Trust Fund -7 -16 -8 -12 -15

Exchange Stabilization Fund 0 0 0 -420 0

Deposit Insurance Fund -3 -66 0 0 -10

Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund 995 -5,717 461 701 -910

FHA, Mutual Mortgage Insurance Capital Reserve Account, HUD 0 0 733 0 -90

Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund 1,450 254 560 1,120 553

Federal Old-Age And Survivors Insurance Trust Fund 5,786 -17,910 2,670 4,074 -17,549

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund -257 8,195 -1,960 -542 6,281

Foreign Service Retirement And Disability Fund 14 0 0 0 0

Highway Trust Fund 1 -992 0 0 1,681

National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund 0 0 3 0 0

Deposits, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Bonus Bids, MMS 0 0 0 0 0

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation -2 -12 1 0 0

Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund 0 0 0 0 0

Postal Service Fund 291 240 424 486 191

Railroad Retirement Account 11 5 14 32 3

Thrift Savings Fund 39,030 -3,492 -4,987 -55,950 8,682

Unemployment Trust Fund -75 -84 -79 -148 -147

Nonmarketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment 307 307 922 305 308

Nonmarketable Inflation Compensation 0 0 0 0 0

All Other Trust Funds -19,294 19,289 -29 -68 198

Total Government Account Series (Net) 26,700 -442 -1,459 -50,397 -467

Certificates of Indebtedness -15 -16 -19 -24 -2

Discount Adjustment -119 13 38 -1 13

Domestic Series 0 0 0 0 0

Foreign Series 0 0 0 0 0

State and Local Government Series 0 0 0 0 0

Tax and Loss Bonds 0 0 0 -27 0

United States Savings Bonds -11 -8 50 -5 1

Total Non-Marketable Activity (Net) 26,556 -453 -1,389 -50,454 -455

Daily Public Debt Activity 0 0 0 0 0

Total Public Debt Subject to Limit 28,881,438 28,881,438 28,881,438 28,881,438 28,881,438

Daily Extraordinary Measures 

Investments Suspended (-)/Reinvested (+) 40,094 -2,147 -4,284 -54,746 10,293

Daily Debt Subject to Limit Activity 

($ millions)
Date

Impacted

Funds

Measures 

Authorized

Measures 

Used

Measures 

Remaining

CSRDF 1/ 63 (63) 0

G Fund 271 (227) 44

ESF 22 0 22

Totals* 357 (290) 66

1/ Includes Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, and Postal 

Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. Assumes Debt Issuance 

Suspension Period (DISP) ends on December 15, 2021. The value 

of early redemptions authorized is $0 as of December 1, 2021.

DEBT SUBJECT TO LIMIT 

EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES

($ billions)

12/8/2021

*Differences may occur due to rounding.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Michael R. Coltrane, President and Chief Executive Officer of CTCommunications, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CT Communications,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
     (b) [Intentionally omitted]
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date:  April 27, 2005  By: /s/ Michael R. Coltrane          Michael R. Coltrane     President and Chief Executive Officer     (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Energy Group (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W.
O'Donnell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






          /s/ Michael W. O'Donnell
--------------------------------------------
            Michael W. O'Donnell
    President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:    May 12, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7250

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-79-25-N, CA-95-740)

Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: May 23, 1997

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and

PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Williams, Nos. CR-79-25-N; CA-95-740 (E.D. Va. July 18, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED