alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7083

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RANDY GEAN WILLIAMS, a/k/a Malik Strong,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (2:99-cr-00116-JBF)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 17, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Gean Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Randy Gean Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s

order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000);

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

(2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong

and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is

likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Williams’ notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to

file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims
- 3 -

based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the

movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255

(2000). Williams’ claims do not satisfy either of these criteria.

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255

motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

ASSISTANT SECRETARY
FOR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS,

January 12, 2022

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Madam Speaker:

Section 8438 of Title 5 of the United States Code requires the Secretary of the Treasury
to report to Congress on the operation and status of the Government Securities
Investment Fund (the G Fund) of the Thrift Savings Fund, part of the Federal Employees’
Retirement System, during any debt issuance suspension period.

Enclosed is the report covering the operation and status of the G Fund during the most
recent debt issuance suspension period. As explained in the report, Treasury has fully
restored the G Fund to the position that it would have been in had there not been a debt
issuance suspension period.

Sincerely,

Wares

Jonathan C. Davidson

Enclosure

Identical letter sent to:
The Honorable Kevin McCarthy, House Minority Leader
The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader
The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Majority Leader

cee The Honorable Richard Neal, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Kevin Brady, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and
Means
The Honorable Ron Wyden, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance
The Honorable Mike Crapo, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
Exhibit 99.1  CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  I,Eric S. Sprott, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the Trust);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Trusts other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Trust and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Trust, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles:  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.  5. The Trusts other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Trusts auditors and the audit committee of the Trusts board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Trusts ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 11, 2011  /s/ Eric S. SprottEric   S. SprottPrincipal Executive Officer
H. R. 2220 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to modify the treatment of certain bargainprice options to purchase at less than fair market value, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON DISCOUNTED PURCHASE OPTIONS. 

Section 585 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(d) Any bargain-price option to purchase at less than fair 

market value contained in any lease agreement entered into on 

or after January 1, 2021, pursuant to this section may be exercised 

only to the extent specifically provided for in subsequent appropriation Acts or other Acts of Congress.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Dwight Spencer BAUGUS and Roger Dorman Haga, Appellees.

No. 73-602.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., Petitioner, v. INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY CO. et al., Respondents.

No. 44505.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 281 So.2d 568.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63519-63520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 112497G]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Scheduled Teleconference

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of scheduled teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Budget 
Committee will hold a telephone conference call.

DATES: The conference call will be held on December 15, 1997, at 1:30 
p.m. (Pacific Standard Time).

ADDRESSES: The telephone conference will originate from the Council 
office, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Six, Executive Director; 
telephone: (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the conference call is to 
adopt a budget for the operation of the Council during calendar year 
1998. At it's November 4-7, 1997 meeting, the Council instructed the 
Budget Committee to confer after the amount available to the Regional 
Fishery

[[Page 63520]]

Management Councils was determined by Congress and NMFS. The amount 
available to the Pacific Council should be known well in advance of the 
December 15 conference call.
    Members of the public wishing to listen to this conference or 
desiring further information should contact Lawrence D. Six, Executive 
Director, Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, 
Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201; telephone: (503) 326-6352.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
this Council for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal Council action during this meeting. Council action 
will be restricted to those issues specifically identified in the 
agenda listed in this notice.

Special Accommodations

    The teleconference is physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to Eric 
Greene at (503) 326-6352 at least 5 days prior to the teleconference 
date.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
Gary C. Matlock,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-31442 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

November 18, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00517

- CR

Trisha Marie ANTHONY

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of T exas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR8748W Honorable Melisa Skinner , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967); however, the brief is not accompanied by: (1) a separate motion to withdraw ; and (2) an exhibit showing that counsel has notified appellant that, should appellant wish to exercise the right to review the appellate record in preparing a response to the Anders brief, appellant should immediately file a motion for pro se access to the appella te record with this court within ten days and has provided appellant with a form motion for this purpose containing the mailing address for this court. See Kelly v. State

, 436 S.W.3d 313

, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

- 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant’s attorney file the requisite motion to withdraw and Kelly exhibit containing a form motion for pro se access to the record in this court no later than 10 days from the date of this order

. Counsel shall also provide proof that a copy of the motion to withdraw and Kelly exhibit containing a form motion for pro se access to the record have been provided to appellant

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of November, 2014

.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph DePaulo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2010-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.
Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by Great Lakes Education Loan Services,
Inc., as subservicer, ACS Education Services, Inc., as subservicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date:
March 29, 2013



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JOSEPH DEPAULO                                                   
|Joseph DePaulo                                                       
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
#### Harriet Diane GRAULICH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-347.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 18, 1973.

Sheldon Yavitz, Coconut Grove, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant entered a guilty plea and then appealed the denial of her motion *115for discharge pursuant to the speedy trial rule. We affirm the judgment of guilty upon authority of the rule stated in White v. State, Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 782. See Fowler v. United States, 391 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1968); United States v. Doyle, 348 F. 2d 715 (2d Cir. 1965).

It is urged that the cited rule ought not be applied in this case since the guilty plea was involuntarily entered because the appellant was led to believe that she could reserve her right to an appeal upon the speedy trial question if she pleaded guilty to the charge. We reject the creation of the desired exception, but we note that the question of the voluntariness of a plea is one of fact. It is properly raised by a motion in the trial court.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lee Max HYDER, Appellee.

No. 72-929.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 13, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
of Citizens, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 I, Rick D. Riley, certify that: In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citizens, Inc (the Company) for the
period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Rick D. Riley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Rick D. RileyName:
    
    Rick D. RileyTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    May 13, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Kemiao
Garment Holding Group. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yanping Sheng, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: June 19, 2020 |  | By:    | /s/ Yanping Sheng                                    
|------------------- |  | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | Name:  | Yanping Sheng                                        
|                    |  | Title: | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2059 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2059

 To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
  any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-of-
   time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations 
                       relating to overtime pay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2021

 Mr. Sarbanes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
  any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-of-
   time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations 
                       relating to overtime pay.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Firefighter Flexibility and 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF HOURS WORKED UNDER A QUALIFIED TRADE-OF-TIME 
              ARRANGEMENT.

    Section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any 
hours worked by a firefighter under a qualified trade-of-time 
arrangement shall be disregarded for purposes of any determination 
relating to eligibility for, or the amount of, any overtime pay under 
this section.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection--
            ``(A) the term `qualified trade-of-time arrangement' means 
        an arrangement under which 2 firefighters who are employed by 
        the same agency agree, solely at their option and with the 
        approval of their employing agency, to substitute for one 
        another during scheduled work hours in the performance of work 
        in the same capacity; and
            ``(B) the term `firefighter' means a firefighter as defined 
        by section 8331(21) or 8401(14).''.
                                 <all>
```