alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MID-LOUISIANA GAS COMPANY v. John E. SANCHEZ et al.

No. 53823.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Mid-Louisiana Gas Company, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. James. 280 So.2d 406.

Writ denied. On the facts found, the result is correct.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30691]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Connecticut Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
12:00 p.m. and adjourn at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 9, 1997, at 
the Catholic Charities, Conference Room, 467 Bloomfield Avenue, 
Bloomfield, Connecticut 06002. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss 
and plan followup activities to the Civil Rights Leadership Conference 
held on November 12 and 13, 1997, in Waterbury.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Neil Macy, 860-
242-7287, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 
202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will 
attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, November 18, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-30691 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
CORONAVIRUS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Allocations for States, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico 

August 2021

State Allocation

Alabama $ 191,887,857.00 

Alaska $ 111,803,893.00 

Arizona $ 190,220,002.00 

Arkansas $ 158,086,576.00 

California $ 540,249,909.00 

Colorado $ 170,751,674.00 

Connecticut $ 141,932,612.00 

Delaware $ 112,839,386.00 

District of Columbia $ 106,967,456.00 

Florida $ 366,036,869.00 

Georgia $ 259,875,389.00 

Hawaii $ 115,475,318.00 

Idaho $ 128,518,323.00 

Illinois $ 253,682,328.00 

Indiana $ 203,132,429.00 

Iowa $ 152,176,435.00 

Kansas $ 143,356,521.00 

Kentucky $ 182,769,205.00 

Louisiana $ 176,741,864.00 

Maine $ 128,245,250.00 

Maryland $ 171,223,815.00 

Massachusetts $ 175,362,478.00 

Michigan $ 250,630,295.00 

Minnesota $ 180,702,620.00 

Mississippi $ 162,609,351.00 

Missouri $ 196,737,544.00 

Montana $ 119,934,533.00 

Nebraska $ 128,740,178.00 

Nevada $ 135,603,020.00 

New Hampshire $ 122,066,151.00 

New Jersey $ 194,715,700.00 

New Mexico $ 133,066,812.00 

New York $ 345,548,881.00 

North Carolina $ 273,583,159.00 
North Dakota $ 113,276,228.00 

Ohio $ 268,578,200.00 

Oklahoma $ 167,683,747.00 

Oregon $ 156,795,418.00 

Pennsylvania $ 278,793,641.00 

Puerto Rico $ 158,310,056.00 

Rhode Island $ 112,291,189.00 

South Carolina $ 185,765,655.00 

South Dakota $ 115,898,703.00 

Tennessee $ 215,218,861.00 

Texas $ 500,475,163.00 

Utah $ 137,895,435.00 

Vermont $ 113,056,440.00 

Virginia $ 219,812,354.00 

Washington $ 195,749,414.00 

West Virginia $ 136,303,698.00 

Wisconsin $ 189,354,516.00 

Wyoming $ 109,467,449.00
|                                         |        |              |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| SUBSIDIARIES OF GOLUB CAPITAL BDC, INC. |
|                                    |   |         |
| Name                                    |   | Jurisdiction |
| Golub Capital BDC CLO 2014 LLC          |   | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC CLO III LLC           |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC CLO III Depositor LLC |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC CLO 4 LLC             |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC CLO 4 Depositor LLC   |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC Funding LLC           |   | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC Funding II LLC        |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC Holdings LLC          |   | Delaware     |
| GBDC Quick Quack Coinvest LLC           |        | Delaware     |
| GBDC Holdings ED Coinvest               |        | Delaware     |
| GC SBIC IV-GP, LLC                      |   | Delaware     |
| GC SBIC IV, L.P.                        |   | Delaware     |
| GC SBIC V-GP, LLC                       |   | Delaware     |
| GC SBIC V, L.P.                         |   | Delaware     |
| GC SBIC VI-GP, LLC                      |        | Delaware     |
| GC SBIC VI, L.P.                        |        | Delaware     |
| GCIC Holdings LLC                       |        | Delaware     |
| GCIC Funding LLC                        |        | Delaware     |
| GCIC Quick Quack Coinvest LLC           |        | Delaware     |
| GCIC CLO II LLC                         |        | Delaware     |
| GCIC CLO II Depositor LLC               |        | Delaware     |
| GCIC Funding II LLC                     |        | Delaware     |
| Senior Loan Fund LLC                    |        | Delaware     |
| Senior Loan Fund II LLC                 |        | Delaware     |
| GCIC Senior Loan Fund LLC               |        | Delaware     |
| GCIC Senior Loan Fund II LLC            |        | Delaware     |
| Mountain Open LLC                       |        | Delaware     |
| Mountain Open 2 LLC                     |        | Delaware     |
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00080-CR

Ex parte Fabbian Donte Scott

FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY

NO. 21-36749, JOHN B. STEVENS JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Fabbian Donte Scott, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal from a January 31, 

2022 order denying his application for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus issued by the criminal 

district court of Jefferson County, Texas.

1 However, our appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases 

does not extend to Jefferson County, which is outside the boundaries of our district. Compare

Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.201(d) (listing twenty-four counties in Third Court of Appeals’ district), 

with id. § 22.201(j) (listing counties in Ninth Court of Appeals District, including 

Jefferson County). Because Jefferson County is outside the boundaries of our district, we lack 

appellate jurisdiction in this matter, and we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

1 We reference only the information that Scott provided in his notice of appeal and in his 

prematurely filed brief because we do not have a clerk’s record.
2

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 22, 2022

Do Not Publish
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 22, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

January 22, 2015

150811 (32)

VICTOR LEON WILSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 150811

COA: 323092

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $4.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$371.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2008 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2008

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2021

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain 
    programs relating to nonpoint source management, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Water Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. NONPOINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS.

    Section 319(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1329(j)) is amended by striking ``subsections (h) and (i) not to 
exceed'' and all that follows through ``fiscal year 1991'' and 
inserting ``subsections (h) and (i) $200,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2022 through 2026''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2021.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 203 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 203 EH

1 SECTION 1. BENNY C. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 4020 Broadway Street in Hous4 ton, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Benny 

5 C. Martinez Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 203 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Houston, Texas, as the ‘‘Benny C. Martinez Post al Service located at 4020 Broadway Street in
M.J., father of J.J., J.J., J.J., and J.J

,
Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSIT ION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2762

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 16, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. David M. Gooding , Judge

.
Jeffrey L. Barrett of the Law Office of Jeffrey L. Barrett, P.A., Jacks onville , for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville; Wendie M. Cooper, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, THOMAS

, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

**HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.**

 

I,Perry A. Glassgow, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary ofHarley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:

 

(i) areview of HDCC’s activities for the period from October 9, 2009 (the closing date of theHarley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2009-3 transaction subject to the requirementsof Regulation AB) through December 31, 2009 (the “Reporting Period”) andof HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009 (the “Sale andServicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2009-3,Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and The Bank of New York TrustCompany, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and

 

(ii) tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in allmaterial respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate in the nameof and behalf of HDCC this 25th day of March 2010.

 

 
|   | By:    |   /s/ Perry A. Glassgow                       |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Perry A. Glassgow                                  |
|   |   | Vice President,  Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|   |   |                                               |
|   |   | Harley-Davidson Credit  Corp.                      |

 

----
**Exhibit      32**

| 1. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,                2006                (the “Report”) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit                fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or                78o(d)). |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of September 30, 2006 and for the period then                ended. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Thomas                F. Farrell, IIThomas                F. Farrell, IIPresident                and Chief Executive OfficerOctober                31, 2006 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Thomas                N. ChewningThomas                N. ChewningExecutive                Vice President and Chief                Financial Officer October                31, 2006 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Opinion issued October 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00139-CV

———————————

DENA WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

SCOTTWOOD APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1040284

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Dena Williams, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), § 101.0411 

(West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 
2

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has 

not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to 

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 

42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2120 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2120

To amend the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and 
   Venues Act to include hospitality businesses in grant program for 
           shuttered venue operators, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2021

   Mr. Amodei (for himself, Mr. Crist, Ms. Titus, and Mr. Pascrell) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and 
   Venues Act to include hospitality businesses in grant program for 
           shuttered venue operators, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing Access for Venue Equity 
Act'' or the ``SAVE Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF HOSPITALITY BUSINESSES IN GRANT PROGRAM FOR 
              SHUTTERED VENUE OPERATORS.

    Section 324 of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, 
Nonprofits, and Venues Act (Public Law 116-260; 134 Stat. 2022; 15 
U.S.C. 9009a) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``a hospitality business,'' before ``or 
        live performing arts organization operator'' each place it 
        appears;
            (2) in the heading for paragraph (3) of subsection (a), by 
        inserting ``a hospitality business,'' before ``or live 
        performing arts organization operator''; and
            (3) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following 
        new paragraph:
            ``(11) Hospitality business.--The term `hospitality 
        business' means a person or entity that is assigned a North 
        American Industry Classification System code beginning with 
        713, 487, 5615, 7113, 721, 722320, or 561920.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 accompanying this  certification
and filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Geoffrey F. Feidelberg,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 13, 2007

                                                      /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                       42
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11264

Summary Calendar

STEVIE ANDRE ROBERSON

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DHIRAJLAL PATEL, DR; F BAXTER, Medical Administrator; DENISE

DESHIELDS, Medical Director; TIMOTHY SIMMONS, Warden; KAREN

JONES, Correctional Officer

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CV-286

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stevie Andre Roberson, Texas prisoner # 1222812, appeals the dismissal

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which he alleged the defendants acted with

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. 

Roberson maintains the district court erred in denying his claim that Dr.

Patel acted with deliberate indifference in that he: delayed providing treatment

for Roberson’s broken toe; continued the same treatment despite Roberson’s

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 8, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-11264

2

complaints of pain; and was not competentto treat Roberson’s medical problems.

Roberson has not shown the district court erred in denying his claims against

Dr. Patel. 

Roberson did not establish that his April 2005 sick call requests or

grievances provided Dr. Patel notice of his complaint of a broken toe. Dr. Patel

examined Roberson’s feet in May 2005, and found no swelling, no deformities,

some loss of range of motion, no pain or tenderness, no redness or warmth;

although Roberson complained of a knot on his toe, there was no indication he

complained of a broken toe at that appointment. 

Roberson first complained of a broken toe to Dr. Patel in an examination

on 23 June 2005. At that time, Dr. Patel observed no swelling, no deformity, no

redness or warmth, no tenderness, full range of motion at the metatarsal carpal

joint, no pain, and felt no mass; he ordered an X-ray of the toe. Thus, Roberson’s

medical records show Dr. Patel did not act with deliberate indifference to

Roberson’s serious medical needs. See Domino v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice,

239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir. 2001).

Roberson contends that Correctional Officer Jones acted with deliberate

indifference by failing to issue wider boots to Roberson, as ordered by Dr. Patel.

The medical records and grievances show that Dr. Patel did not issue a

prescription for wider boots, but rather referred Roberson to Officer Jones’ office

to have his feet measured. Roberson’s allegations indicate that, at most, Officer

Jones was negligent in measuring his feet and not providing wider boots. Acts

of negligence do not constitute deliberate indifference. See Domino, 239 F.3d at

756; see also Gobert v. Caldwell, 463 F.3d 339, 346 (5th Cir. 2006). 

Therefore, the judgment is AFFIRMED. Roberson’s motion for en banc

hearing is DENIED.