alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31004]



[[Page 63147]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP92-108-016 and RP92-137-049]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Report of 
Refunds

November 20, 1997.
    Take notice on November 14, 1997, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing a report of refunds 
pertaining to refunds distributed on October 14, 1997.
    Transco states that the purpose of such refund was to comply with 
(i) the Commission's Order on Remand issued on June 12, 1997, regarding 
the distribution of excess interruptible transportation (IT) revenues 
for the period November 1, 1993 through August 31, 1995, and (ii) the 
Division of Audits letter order issued January 8, 1997, regarding IT 
revenues related to the Spider Field lateral.
    Transco states that it is serving copies of the instant filing to 
the State Commissions of the recipients of the refund.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
on or before November 28, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31004 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31734]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[NCEA-CD-97-1015; FRL-5931-2]


Air Quality Criteria for Carbon Monoxide

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Call for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Center for Environmental Assessment, of the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is undertaking to update and 
revise, where appropriate, the EPA's Air Quality Criteria for Carbon 
Monoxide (CO) as required under sections 108 and 109 of the Clean Air 
Act.
    Since completion of the 1991 criteria document for carbon monoxide, 
the EPA has continued to follow the scientific literature and compile 
information that may be relevant to the next periodic review of the 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for CO (CO NAAQS). Interested 
parties are invited to assist the EPA in developing and refining its 
scientific information base to help ensure that all relevant 
information is considered in updating the Air Quality Criteria for CO. 
Identification of new information in the following areas will be 
particularly useful: effects of exposure on laboratory animals and 
humans; effects on the global climate; chemistry and physics; sources 
and emissions; transformation and transport in the environment; and 
ambient concentrations.
    To be considered for inclusion in the criteria document and in the 
next periodic review of the CO NAAQS, submitted information should have 
been published, accepted for publication, or presented at a public 
scientific meeting.

DATES: All communications and information should be submitted by 
December 31, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Communications should be addressed to the Project Manager 
for CO, National Center for Environmental Assessment (MD-52), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane H. Ray, National Center for 
Environmental Assessment (MD-52), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone: 919-541-3637; facsimile: 
919-541-1818; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4436253d6a202d252a210421342529252d286a2134256a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3745564e19535e565952775247565a565e5b1952475619505841">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
William H. Farland,
Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 97-31734 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### McCALIP v. WINTER GARDEN CITRUS PRODUCTS et al.

No. 39031.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
# ERA1 by State - Percentage
Processing (IMending) Qescription 

### (Yalid for both PMN substaoces & all 3 btending locations) [ X ] — CBI — entire page
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #32 – 7.02 Plan Identification Information 

Does the application include the required plan identification information? 

 

See section 7.02. 

Document 32.1 provides the Plan’s identification information. 
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #32 – 7.02 Plan Identification Information 

32.1 

Document 32.1

Plan Identification Information

Name of Plan: International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension 

Fund

Plan Number: 001

EIN: 38-6237143 (same as the plan sponsor’s EIN)
Exhibit 32.2.2



Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Joan S. Freilich, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the Company) certify that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, which this statement accompanies, (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    JOAN S. FREILICHJoan S. Freilich




Dated: August 5, 2004
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0192. RANDALL YOUNG v. SCOTT WILKES.

In 2014, Randall Young pleaded guilty to burglary and other offenses. He

thereafter filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. After the trial court denied his

petition, Young filed an application for discretionary review in this Court. The

Supreme Court, however, has appellate jurisdiction over all cases involving habeas

corpus. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4). This application is

therefore TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

November 28, 2017

11/28/2017
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2208 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

AN ACT 

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development 

on terms that are equal and fair, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2208 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 

3 and Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair 

4 Opportunity Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

6 The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 

7 Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (Public 

8 Law 100–89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

11 ‘‘Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude 

12 or limit the applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 

13 Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.8

GRAPHIC

MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Sprott
Asset Management LP, the "Manager" of the Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the "Trust") is responsible for the integrity, consistency, objectivity and reliability of the Financial
Statements of the Trust. International Financial Reporting Standards have been applied and management has exercised its judgment and made best estimates where appropriate.

The
Manager's internal controls and supporting procedures maintained provide reasonable assurance that financial records are complete and accurate. These supporting procedures include the oversight of
RBC Investor Services, the Trust's valuation agent.

Management
has assessed the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting as at December 31, 2012 using the framework found in Internal
Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, management has
concluded that as at December 31, 2012 the Manager's internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Ernst &
Young LLP, the independent auditors appointed by the Manager of the Trust, have audited the effectiveness of the Trust's internal control over financial reporting as at
December 31, 2012 in addition to auditing the Trust's Financial Statements as of the same date. Their reports, which expressed an unqualified opinion, can be found on pages 2 to 3
of the Financial Statements. Ernst & Young have full and free access to, and meet periodically with, the Manager of the Trust to discuss their audit and matters arising there from, such as,
comments they may have on the fairness of financial reporting and the adequacy of internal controls.

GRAPHIC

Steven
Rostowsky
Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2013

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cox
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I,
James O. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ James O. Robbins
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: James O. Robbins
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date: August 8, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
documentation authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cox Communications, Inc.
and will be retained by Cox Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[ J

- 66

- 2018 ] [MO: Mundy, J. ]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

HIKO ENERGY, LLC,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 39 EAP 2017

Appeal from the Order of
Commonwealth Court entered on June 8, 2017 at No. 5 CD 2017 affirming the Order entered on December 3, 2015 by the Pennsylvania Public Utility
Commission at No. C

- 2014

- 2431410

ARGUED: September 2 6, 2018

D ISSENTING O PINION

JUSTICE DONOHUE DECIDED: June 5, 2019

I dissent. This Court granted allocatur to address three issues, including the

following:

(1) Whether the $1,836,125.00 penalty was so grossly disproportionate to the penalties the Commission has approved for similar or more egregious conduct as to violate the Excessive Fines Clause of the Pennsylvania and U.S.
Constitutions.

HIKO Energy, LLC v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n , 176 A.3d 235 (Pa. 2017) . This

issue presents a con stitutional question regarding the excessive fines clauses of the

Pennsylvania and federal c onstitutions. In my view, this issue must be addressed and

decided by this Court in our resolution of this appeal.

Rather than resolving the legal issue presented, the Majority shifts the focus to an

entirely different legal issue, namely whether HIKO waived the constitutional issue below.[ J

- 66

- 2018 ] [MO: Mundy, J. ]

- 2

This Court did not , however, grant allocatur to consider this issue of waiver, and we did

not do so despite our full knowledge that the PUC had contested whether HIKO had

preserved the constitutional issue in the Commonwealth Court and that the waiver issue

was a central issue in th at c ourt’s disposition of the case

. The Commonwealth Court is

well suited to address issues of waiv er, for which there is already a well

- established and

comprehensive body of case law. In contrast, this Court is best suited to resolve the

constitutional issue of first impression on which we granted allocatur.

If the Court had intended to decide th e issue of waiver, we could have granted

allocatur to review it. We did not. The waiver issue is not encompassed within our grant

of allowance of appeal and is not an issue before the Court in this appeal. I must therefore

dissent, as I am of the view t hat this Court s hould proceed to decide the constitutional

issue on its merits by published opinion.

Chief Justice Saylor joins this dissenting opinion.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50774 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

CHOYCE TOLLIVER ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 109

- 1

Before OWEN , GRAVES , and OLDHAM , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Choyce Tolliver has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Tolliver h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brie f and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 7, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50774 Document: 00514946807 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2019No. 18

- 50774

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-50774 Document: 00514946807 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2019
| | kpmg LLP                  |           |               
| | ------------------------- | --------- | --------------
| | Chartered Accountants     | Telephone | (403) 691-8000
| | 2700 205 - 5th  Avenue SW | Telefax   | (403) 691-8008
| | Calgary AB  T2P 4B9       | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca   



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd.



We consent to the use of our audit report dated March 6, 2013
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd. as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011and
the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December
31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information
included in this annual report on Form 40-F.



Yours very truly,





/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

March 21, 2013

Calgary, Canada



KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership
and a member firm of the KPMG

network of independent member firms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative

(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the“Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: November 1, 2007
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

August 11,
2005

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comcast Holdings Corporation (the "Report") for the purpose of complying
with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code.

Brian
L. Roberts, the Chief Executive Officer, Lawrence S. Smith, the Co-Chief Financial Officer and John R. Alchin, the Co-Chief Financial Officer of Comcast Holdings
Corporation, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| |  | /s/BRIAN L. ROBERTSName: Brian L. Roberts
Chief Executive Officer     
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/LAWRENCE S. SMITHName: Lawrence S. Smith
Co-Chief Financial Officer
| |  | /s/JOHN R. ALCHINName: John R. Alchin
Co-Chief Financial Officer      

---



QuickLinks
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31584]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act 
of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 27, 1997, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of permit 
applications received. Permits were issued on November 24, 1997 to the 
following applicants:

Alexandra C. Brown and Maria Uhle--Permit No. 98-016
Philip R. Kyle--Permit No. 98-018
Gary Miller--Permit No. 98-019
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-31584 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
#### James BROWN v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39215.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Appeals dismissed without opinion. 227 So.2d 527.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.    /s/Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  May 9, 2008    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jim FAIR, etc., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and General Telephone Company of Florida, Respondents.

No. 43034.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Cause dismissed sua sponte.
#### Jeff CLARK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42955.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 4, 1972.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., dissent. •
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 941 05 

1 0 208 

Ms. Nancy Wrona 

Director, Air Quality Division 

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 

1 1 10 W. Washington St. 

Phoenix, AZ 85007 

Dear Ms. Wrona: 

Thank you for your submission of the Final Report on the State of Arizona Air 

Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2008. We have reviewed the submitted document 

and have found that it is complete, informative, very detailed and meets all of the 

requirements for annual network plans as required by our regulations set forth under 40 

CFR Part 58.10. We also specifically approve the proposed network changes as 

discussed in section 3.0 the submitted plan. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at 

(4 15) 972-326 1. 

Air Division 

Air Quality Analysis Office 

cc: Stephen Peplau, ADEQ 

Bernard Lum, ADEQ 

Sandra Wardwell, ADEQ