alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Jonathan Neman, certify that:





1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sweetgreen, Inc.;





2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(d)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date: March 4, 2022


/s/ Jonathan Neman


Jonathan Neman


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
Memorandum of Understanding 

Regarding the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and 

the Government of the Republic of San Marino for Cooperation to Facilitate the 

Implementation of FATCA 

At the signing today of the Agreement between the Government ofthe United States of 

America and the Government ofthe Republic of San Marino for Cooperation to Facilitate the 

Implementation ofFATCA (hereinafter the "Agreement"), the representatives ofthe United 

States of America and the Republic of San Marino wish to confirm their understanding of the 

following: 

With reference to Paragraph C of Section I (Central Bank) of Annex IT of the 

Agreement 

It is understood that the Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino meets the definition of 

the term "Central Bank." 

Signed at So. n M~v-' "' o , in duplicate, in the English and Italian languages, this 

:2..t01'\. dayof @c-t. ,20_li. 

FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 

FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

REPUBLIC OF SAN MARINO: F 11r"L_
The Association

The Products Member Directory Certification + Testing Publications + Resources Contact Us

User Name

Password

> I forgot my password > Become a member Home | About CPA | Bookstore | EPP Programs | Member Quick Links | Join CPA | Contact Us | CARB Rule

Return toThe Products 

### Hardboard (HB) Hardboard is used in a variety of applications including furniture components, wall paneling, exterior siding and trim, underlayment, interior trim and perforated boards. In addition to the familiar “brown board,” panels are available in many forms including sophisticated woodgrains and embossed surfaces. Hardboard is a composite panel manufactured primarily from inter-felted ligno-cellulosic fibers consolidated under heat and pressure. Other materials may be added during the manufacturing process to improve certain properties, such as resistance to abrasion and moisture, and increased strength and durability. Hardboard has a uniform thickness, density and appearance and has no grain. It resis marring, scuffing and abrasion, as well as changes in temperature and humidity. Hardboard can be cut, routed, shaped and drilled with standard woodworking tools. In addition, hardboard can be securely glued or fastened with screws, staples or nails. Hardboard panels can be laminated with paper overlays, plastic laminates and veneers

Common Uses Prefinished Paneling Siding Perforated Board Exterior Trim Office and Residential Furniture Door Skins

Product Standards and Certification The American National Standard for Basic Hardboard (ANSI A135.4) is the North American industry standard which classifies hardboard by thickness and physical properties. The classification consists of five classes: Tempered, Standard, Service-Tempered, Service and Industrialite. The American National Standard for Prefinished Hardboard Paneling (ANSI A135.5)establishes the property requirements for dimensional tolerances and moisture content, along with resistance to abrasion, fading, heat, humidity, scrape, steam and stain. Requirements for washability, gloss, workmanship and flame spread are also specified. The American National Standard for Hardboard Siding (ANSI A135.6) requirements and methods of testing for the exterior durability, dimensions, Products - Hardboard zotero://attachment/427/

1 of 1 12/8/2010 8:58 AM
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com May 12, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Greenman

- Pedersen, Inc

. Exemption Request Under

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and

Reform Act of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Greenman

- Pe dersen , Inc. ( GPI ), a n

engineering consulting and construction management firm and operator of small

Unmanned Aircraft System s ( s UAS), seeks an exemption from the following listed Code

of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, precision aerial

photogrammetric mapping and topographic surveys for engineering inspection of

transportation and building infrastructure projects and asso ciated market research

.

G reenman

- Pedersen, Inc. i n the accompanying petition, see ks exemption from the

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c),

91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

Greenman

- Pedersen, Inc. has requested that the FAA not s olicit p ublic comment on its

petition because it would not set a precedent and because the relief requested is identical

to exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87.

In addition, GPI will be utilizing the s ame DJI proven technologies the FAA has already

s crutinized and approved for numerous other Section 333 exemptions. Also, GPI ’ s

package accompanying the Section 333 P etition for E xemption is robust, thorough

, and

comprehensive

, and along with all of the published Phantom 2 Vision+ Manuals, includes

the GPI Standard Operat ing Procedures , including S afety Management Systems

, Maintenance Manual, and applicable operational checklists.UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com All of the appropriate documentation to accompany GPI ’ s Section 333 Petition is included.

Combined, this comp rehensive package, the approvals the FAA has already given to DJI

products and th e te chnology, should provide the support necessary to the FAA for a

summary grant of GPI ’ s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Jim Williams

Jo e Morra

Jake Troutman

Robert Papas

Dean Griffith, Esq.
1 

### Hall-Jordan, Luke

From: Jones, Danielle <Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 12:14 PM To: Donaldson, David Cc: Hall-Jordan, Luke; Arling, Jeremy Subject: EO 12866 Interagency Review: Protection of Stratosp heric Ozone: Update to the Refrigerant Management Requirements Under Section 6 08 of the Clean Air Act

Hello David,

OMB has concluded review on the NPRM entitled Prote ction of Stratospheric Ozone: Update to the Refrige rant Management Requirements Under Section 608 of the Cl ean Air Act.

It was a pleasure working with you and your staff o n this review.

Best, Danielle

Danielle Y. Jones Policy Analyst Office of Management and Budget Phone: (202) 395-1741 | djones@omb.eop.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cox Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, James O. Robbins, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and I, William J. Fitzsimmons, Vice President
of Accounting and Financial Planning and Analysis and Chief Accounting Officer
and acting chief financial officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ James O. Robbins
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name: James O. Robbins
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                             Date: August 9, 2005

                                             /s/ William J. Fitzsimmons
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name: William J. Fitzsimmons
                                             Title: Vice President of Accounting
                                             and Financial Planning and Analysis
                                             and Chief Accounting Officer
                                             Date: August 9, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other documentation authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to Cox and will be retained
by Cox and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification "accompanies" the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cox under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6715

LAJOEL THEODORE ROUSE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ERIC D. WILSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:13-cv-00748-GBL-TRJ)

Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

LaJoel T. Rouse, Appellant Pro Se. Ayana Niambi Free, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

LaJoel Theodore Rouse seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)

petition,* construing the petition as a second or successive 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing the motion for lack 

of jurisdiction. The district court’s order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive

procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Rouse has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

 * The district court properly determined that Rouse could 

not proceed with his claims under § 2241. See United States v. 

Poole, 531 F.3d 263, 267 n.7 (4th Cir. 2008); In re: Jones, 226 

F.3d 328, 333 (4th Cir. 2000).
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/30/2015 9:13:44 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1.2**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert N. Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the“Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: November 2, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:
    Agenda Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.

Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel

    Date: November 24, 1997.
    Time: 2 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: W. Gregory Zimmerman, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-1340.

Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel

    Date: November 25, 1997.
    Time: 3:30 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: W. Gregory Zimmerman, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-1340.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to the 
meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-31235 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33509]


Colorado, Kansas & Pacific Railway Company--Acquisition and 
Operation Exemption--Union Pacific Railroad Company

    Colorado, Kansas & Pacific Railway Company (Colorado), a 
noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 
1150.31 to acquire from Union Pacific Railroad Company and to operate 
approximately 121.9 miles of rail line between milepost 747.5, near 
Towner, and milepost 869.4, near NA Junction, in Kiowa, Crowley, and 
Pueblo Counties, CO (Line).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Line was the subject of an application for abandonment 
in Docket No. AB-3 (Sub-No. 130), Missouri Pacific Railroad 
Company--Abandonment--Towner-NA Junction Line in Kiowa, Crowley, and 
Pueblo Counties, CO, and discontinuance of trackage rights 
operations in the embraced Docket No. AB-8 (Sub-No. 38), The Denver 
and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company--Discontinuance of Trackage 
Rights-- Towner-NA Junction Line in Kiowa, Crowley and Pueblo 
Counties, CO. The abandonment and discontinuance were granted in 
Union Pacific Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, and 
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company--Control and Merger--Southern 
Pacific Rail Corporation, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, 
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, SPCSC Corp., and The Denver 
and Rio Grand Western Railroad Company, Finance Docket No. 32760 
(STB served Aug. 12, 1996). Colorado indicates that the abandonment 
was never consummated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was expected to be consummated on or about November 
17, 1997.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33509, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on John D. Heffner, Esq., Rea, Cross & Auchincloss, 1920 N 
Street, N.W., Suite 420, Washington, DC 20036.

    Decided: November 25, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31556 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7161

RONALD WALLACE HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. IBARRA, Physician; P. A. TERRANGI, Warden;

INDIAN CREEK CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-507-AM)

Submitted: December 14, 1999 Decided: December 30, 1999

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Wallace Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with a

court order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Ibarra, No. CA99-507-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED