alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thomas N. Chewning, Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2003 and for the period then ended.





|/s/ Thomas N. ChewningThomas N. Chewning
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2003
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Consolidated Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Consolidated Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CT
Communications, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on
the date hereof:  (a)
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Michael R. ColtraneMichael R. ColtraneChief Executive OfficerApril 27, 2005 /s/ James E. HausmanJames E. HausmanChief Financial OfficerApril 27, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to CT Communications, Inc. and will be retained by CT Communications, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLANTATION, Florida, Petitioner, v. Hon. Lamar WARREN, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-288.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 16, 1971.

Prohibition denied.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

54 KA 12-01614 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETER J. HARRIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY J. BRENNAN, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (CARL J. ROSENKRANZ OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Thomas G. Leone, J.), rendered December 8, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal mischief in the third degree, menacing in the second degree and harassment in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]) and criminal mischief in the third degree (§ 145.05 [2]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as charged to the jury ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict convicting defendant of that crime is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction of criminal mischief in the third degree ( see generally id. ). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 223 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reimburse qualified 

health care providers for the costs of purchasing, leasing, installing, 

and operating qualified equipment for cold storage of COVID–19 vaccines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2021 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself and Mr. SIRES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

reimburse qualified health care providers for the costs 

of purchasing, leasing, installing, and operating qualified 

equipment for cold storage of COVID–19 vaccines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Cold Stor5 age Expansion Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 223 IH

1 SEC. 2. REIMBURSING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS FOR 

2 EQUIPMENT FOR COLD STORAGE OF COVID– 

3 19 VACCINES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

5 Human Services shall reimburse qualified health care pro6 viders for the costs of purchasing, leasing, installing, and 

7 operating qualified equipment for cold storage of COVID– 

8 19 vaccines. 

9 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

10 (1) The term ‘‘COVID–19 vaccine’’ means a 

11 vaccine to prevent or mitigate the virus that causes 

12 COVID–19. 

13 (2) The term ‘‘qualified equipment’’ means 

14 equipment that meets such criteria as the Food and 

15 Drug Administration may specify for cold storage of 

16 a COVID–19 vaccine. 

17 (3) The term ‘‘qualified health care provider’’ 

18 means a health care provider that— 

19 (A) is licensed or credentialed in the juris20 diction where vaccination takes place; and 

21 (B) completes and signs the CDC COVID– 

22 19 Vaccination Program Provider Agreement. 

23 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry 

24 out this Act, there are authorized to be appropriated such 

25 sums as may be necessary, to be derived from amounts 

26 made available to the Secretary of Health and Human 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 223 IH

1 Services by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Se2 curity Act (Public Law 116–136) and allocated for Oper3 ation Warp Speed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Michael A. Weiss, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Express, Inc. for the year ended February 1, 2014;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 17, 2014 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael A. Weiss   
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Michael A. Weiss       
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31444]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 112497B]

Marine Mammals; Scientific Research Permit No. 872-1397

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Ann E. Bowles, Ph.D., Hubbs-Sea 
World Research Institute, 2595 Ingraham Street, San Diego, CA 92109, 
has been issued a permit for purposes of scientific research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); and
    Director, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Long Beach, 
CA 90802-4213 (562/980-4001).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 18, 1997, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (62 FR 38521) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to take (i.e., harass) up to 10 beached rehabilitated 
animals of each of three pinniped species annually: northern elephant 
seals (Mirounga angustirostris) Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina 
richardsi), and California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) had been 
submitted by the above-named individual. The proposed research will be 
conducted over a 5-year period at Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute 
and Sea World, San Diego, California. The requested permit has been 
issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, 
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and the regulations governing the 
taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-31444 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
ACCEPTED 12-13-00368-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 11/9/2015 1:30:28 PM

Pam Estes CLERK
255 La. 915

#### Obey MURRAY, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana, Calcasieu Parish Court, et al.

No. 50520.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1970.

In re: Obey Murray, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The showing made does not entitle applicant to the relief sought.
#### In re the ESTATE of Augusta GLENDINNING, Deceased.

No. 73-853.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 17, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Probate Division, Broward County; Paul M. Marko III, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
OFFER PAID LEAVE

FIGHT COVID-19

Keep employees safe by offering paid leave

Thanks to the American Rescue Plan, immediate tax credits are available through most of 2021 to 

businesses that offer their employees paid sick and family leave. You could see these credits in your 

bottom line as soon as your next quarterly filing.

These credits make it easy to keep your employees safe and healthy. And, they are good for more than 

just your business: Offering paid sick and family leave helps fight the virus by helping employees get 

vaccinated and encouraging sick employees to stay home.

THE

D

EPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

1789

Find out more about the BidenHarris Administration’s 

recovery programs at 

TREASURY.GOV/CORONAVIRUS

Please note that this is a simplified description of the paid 

leave credit rules. Business owners should consult with 

their tax advisors regarding the specifics of their situation.

Get paid back for paid leave

If you:

• Are a business with under 500 employees;

• Offer paid sick or family leave to your employees through

September 30, 2021; and

• Have employees who take paid leave due to COVID

including for illness, quarantine, getting tested or

vaccinated, or caregiving.

Your business may be eligible for tax credits of more than

$17,000 per employee who takes sick or family leave

from April 1 through September 30, 2021.

For the 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2021, businesses may take tax 

credits for wages up to 80 hours of paid sick leave in an 

amount equal to either: 

(1) the employee’s regular wage, capped at $511/day, up to a

total of $5,110 if the employee was sick or quarantining,

awaiting the results of a COVID test, obtaining or recovering

from a vaccine; or

(2) two-thirds of the employee’s regular wage, capped at

$200/day, up to a total of $2,000, if the employee was taking

time to care for someone quarantining or to provide care

due to COVID-19 school or child care provider closures.

Paid Leave Credit

Paid Leave for 2021

Employers may receive tax credits for up to 

twelve weeks of paid family leave provided to 

employees who are unable to work for any of 

the reasons listed. Those credits are equal to 

two-thirds of an employee’s regular wages, 

capped at $200/day up to a total of $12,000. 

Businesses that pay employees for qualifying 

leave can take the tax credit against their 

share of certain payroll taxes. If the amount of 

the credit exceeds a business’s portion of its 

payroll taxes, then the excess is refunded –

paid – directly back to the business.

Businesses can file quarterly for this credit 

through September 30, 2021. 

Past paid leave credits

Your business may also be eligible for 

additional credits for those who took sick 

leave earlier in the public health crisis. 

Beginning April 1, 2020, any businesses with 

fewer than 500 employees were entitled to a 

tax credit equal to 100% of emergency paid 

leave they provided for qualifying reasons 

related to COVID-19.
1

Applicant Name and Contact Information:
USAerobotix LLC
Attn: Jason T. Adams, Vice President
PO BOX 124 Gettysburg, OH 45328 (260) 444

- 1550 jason@usaerobotix.com

April 17, 2015

Exemption Revision to Docket FAA

- 2015

- 0231

- 0001

Dear Administrators,

In addendum to the review process of USAerobotix LLC ’ s ( “ USAerobotix ” ), the operator, would request a revised understanding of the qualifications for the Pilot

- in

- Command ( “ PIC ” ) of the Operation. A s stated in the original request for exemption, still under review as of this writing in List of Limitations and
Conditions :

12. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third

- class medical certificate. The PIC will also meet the flight re view requirements specified in 14 C.F.R. § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his/her pilot certificate. If the FAA were to pass legislation for separate criteria for a UAS private pilot certificate, that may also be used. Similar level

cert ification from the Department of Defense may also satisfy this requirement. USAerobotix also believes that the training and certification program outlined in the Manual is sufficient and could replace the Private Pilot Certificate requirement, upon the FAA ’s approval.

USAerobotix wrote above in the original exemption that if the FAA were to pass legislation for separate criteria for a UAS pr ivate pilot certificate, that may also be used. As of April 9, 2015, the FAA issued a press release explaining the newer, faster, more flexible regulatory approach to Section 333 exemption requests.

USAerobotix would like to amend its original propo sal for P IC requirements by inclu ding the following :

12. The PIC must possess at lea st a recreatio nal or sport pilot certificate and a valid driver ’ s license. The PIC will also meet the flight re view requirements specified in 14 C.F.R. § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his/her pilot certificate. If the FAA were to pass legislation for separate criteria for a UAS private pilot certificate, that may also be used. Similar level

cert ification from the Department of Defense may also satisfy this requirement. USAerobotix also believes that the training and certification program outlined in the Manual is sufficient and could replace the requirement for pilot certification , upon the FAA ’s approval.

The ab ove will replace the original 12 th point in th e List of Limitations and Conditions, as referenced
earlier in this document. USAerobotix understands that this amendment does not alter the original intent of the first exemption proposal submitted. USAerobotix wishes to be clear on the safety and

p racticability of UAS operations versus manned operations for utility inspection.2 Sincerely,

Jason T. Adams
Vice President , USAerobotix LLC
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

NO. WR-91, 750-01

EX P ART E ROB ER T CHARLE S AT LA S, Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. C-372- W011802-1429689- A IN THE 372ND DI STRI CT COURT

F ROM TA RRANT COUNT Y

P er cur iam

.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t was co n v i ct ed o f capi

t al m urder an d s en

t en ced t o l i f

e i m pri s o n m en t

. T h e Seco n d

Co urt o f A

ppeal s af f i rm ed h i s co n

v i ct i o n

. A tlas v. State, No

. 02-15- 00380-CR (T ex

. Ap p

. — Ft

.

W o rt h

, J un e 29, 2017). A

ppl i can t f i l ed t h i s appl i cat i o n f

o r a wri t o f h ab eas co rpus i n t h e co un

t y o f

co n v i ct i o n

, an d t h e di s t ri ct cl erk f o rwarded i

t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t co n t en ds t h at ap p e l l a t e co un s el was i n ef f ect i v e b eca us e h e f ai l ed t o t i m el y f i l e a

PDR. Ba s ed o n t h e reco rd, t h e t ri al co urt h as det erm i n ed t h at appel l at e co un s el ’ s perf o rm an ce den i ed

A ppl i can t t h e o ppo rt un i

t y t o f i l e a PDR.

Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. W e f i n d t h at A ppl i can t i s en t i t l ed t o t h e o ppo rt un i

t y t o f i l e an o ut -o f

-t i m e

PDR o f t h e j udgm en

t o f t h e Seco n d Co urt o f A ppeal s i n cas e n um b er 02-15- 00380-CR t h at af f i rm ed2

h i s co n v i ct i o n i n Ca us e No

. 1429689 f

ro m t h e 372n d Di s t ri ct Co urt o f T arr an t Co un t y

. A ppl i can t

s h al l f i l e h i s PDR wi

t h t h i s Co urt wi

t h i n 30 day s o f t h e dat e o n wh i ch t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e i s s ues

.

Del i v ered: Oct o b er 21, 2020

Do n o t pub l i s h
#### GLOBE INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, and Peoples Gas System, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. Sylvia Kay ZELLER, individually and as Administratrix and Surviving Widow of Frank Zeller, Deceased, Respondent.

No. 69-984.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
**Exhibit 10.26**

**REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC.**

**2014 MANAGEMENT BONUS PROGRAM**

Upon therecommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Revance Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), the Company’s Board of Directors on March 17, 2014, approved the corporate objectives for the Company’snamed executive officers relating to the Company’s 2014 cash performance bonus program (the “2014 Bonus Program”). 

The 2014 Bonus Programis designed to reward, through the payment of annual cash bonuses, the Company’s executive officers for the Company’s performance in meeting key corporate objectives for 2014 and for the Company’s named executive officers other thanthe Chief Executive Officer, individual performance in meeting specified corporate goals for the year. The actual cash bonus awarded in any year, if any, may be more or less than each executive’s annual target bonus, and shall be subject toapproval by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors. For the Company’s named executive officers, the target bonuses, and whether or not a bonus is paid in any year, is within the discretion of the Compensation Committee. 

The 2014 corporate objectives relate to product development milestones, including successful completion of the Company’s ongoing RT002 Phase 1/2glabellar lines clinical trial (30% weighting) and achievement of positive efficacy results from the planned RT001 Phase 3 crow’s feet lines clinical trial in the United States (40% weighting) and the achievement of specified financingobjectives (30% weighting). 

Our Chief Executive Officer’s cash bonus under the 2014 Bonus Program will be entirely based on the achievement of the2014 corporate objectives. The cash bonus for all other named executive officers shall be based on the achievement of his or her individual performance goals (25% weighting) and on the achievement of the 2014 corporate objectives (75% weighting).The named executive officers’ actual bonuses may exceed 100% of target in the event performance exceeds the predetermined goals.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022198
<NAME> COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,897,967
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     34,652
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         242,242
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        21,950
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 357,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,554,584
<COMMON>                                        41,026
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      572,017
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            137,238
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 750,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           840,002
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  94,725
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   96,390
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     32,681
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 5,853
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 709,652
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,554,584
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      841,294
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            57,643
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     628,358
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     686,001
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        155,293
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,018
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 157,311
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        59,069
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,242
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,909
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   96,333
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        59,013
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       41,539
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         117,336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>