alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Defense Panel Meeting

AGENCY: National Defense Panel, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
meeting of the National Defense Panel on November 24 & 25, 1997. In 
accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App. II, (1982)], it has been 
determined that this National Defense Panel meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1982), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public from 0900-1700, November 24 & 25, 1997 in 
order for the Panel to discuss classified material.

DATES: November 24 & 25, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Suite 532, 1931 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington VA.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Defense Panel was established 
on January 14, 1997 in accordance with the Military Force Structure 
Review Act of 1996, Public Law 104-201. The mission of the National 
Defense Panel is to provide the Secretary of Defense and Congress with 
an independent, non-partisan assessment of the Secretary's Quadrennial 
Defense Review and an Alternative Force Structure Analysis. This 
analysis will explore innovative ways to meet the national security 
challenges of the twenty-first century.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: The National Defense Panel will meet in 
closed session from 0900-1700 on November 24 & 25. During the closed 
sessions on November 24th & 25th from 0900-1700 the Panel will meet in 
Executive Session to write and review the NDP Report at the Crystal 
Mall 3 office.
    The determination to close the meeting is based on the 
consideration that it is expected that discussion will involve 
classified matters of national security concern throughout.
    This Notification also is written verification that the Panel was 
unable to provide notice of this meeting 15 days prior to the date of 
the meeting due to scheduling conflicts; finding it necessary to change 
meeting dates to ensure that all Panel members be in attendance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact the National Defense 
Panel at (703) 602-4175/6.

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-31326 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00282

- CV

___________________________

Original Procee ding 233rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 233

- 655710

- 19

Before Bassel , J.; Sudderth, C.J .; and Womack, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### S.Z. , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion
fo r emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied for want of a
reporter ’ s record and an order

. See In re State ex rel. Skurka , 512 S.W.3d 444, 45 0

– 5 1 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi

– Edinburg 2016, orig. proceeding )

. Accor dingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.
Per Curiam
Delivered : August 9, 2023
Exhibit 15    May 9, 2008   Northeast Utilities 107 Selden Street Berlin, Connecticut 06037  We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information of Northeast Utilities and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, as indicated in our report dated May 9, 2008 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of January 1, 2008); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-141425 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-63144, 333-121364 and 333-142724 on Forms S-8.  We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.   /s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

May 22, 2023

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy
Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Speaker:

I am writing to follow up on my previous letters regarding the debt limit and to provide
additional information regarding the Treasury Department's ability to continue to finance the
operations of the federal government. In my May 15 letter, I noted that our best estimate was that
Treasury would be unable to continue to satisfy all of the government’s obligations by early June
if Congress does not raise or suspend the debt limit before that time. In that letter, I also noted
that while it is impossible to predict with certainty the exact date when Treasury will be unable
to pay all the government’s bills, | would continue to update Congress as more information
becomes available. With an additional week of information now available, I am writing to note
that we estimate that it is highly likely that Treasury will no longer be able to satisfy all of the
government’s obligations if Congress has not acted to raise or suspend the debt limit by early
June, and potentially as early as June 1.

These estimates are based on currently available data, and federal receipts, outlays, and debt
could vary from these estimates. I will continue to update Congress as more information
becomes available.

We have learned from past debt limit impasses that waiting until the last minute to suspend or
increase the debt limit can cause serious harm to business and consumer confidence, raise short-
term borrowing costs for taxpayers, and negatively impact the credit rating of the United States.
In fact, we have already seen Treasury’s borrowing costs increase substantially for securities
maturing in early June. If Congress fails to increase the debt limit, it would cause severe hardship
to American families, harm our global leadership position, and raise questions about our ability
to defend our national security interests.


I continue to urge Congress to protect the full faith and credit of the United States by acting as
soon as possible.

Sincerely,

O*F

Identical letter sent to:
The Honorable Hakeem Jeffries, House Democratic Leader
The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Majority Leader
The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican Leader

cc: The Honorable Jason Smith, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Richard E. Neal, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Ron Wyden, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance
The Honorable Mike Crapo, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
----

----

| Parent Company          |   | Subsidiary Company                    |   | State of Incorporation |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                    |   |                                  |   |                   |
| Oneida Financial Corp   |   | The Oneida Savings Bank               |   | New York               |
|                    |   |                                  |   |                   |
| The Oneida Savings Bank |   | Oneida Preferred Funding Corp.        |   | New York               |
|                    |   |                                  |   |                   |
| The Oneida Savings Bank |   | Bailey & Haskell Associates, Inc. |   | New York               |
|                    |   |                                  |   |                   |
| The Oneida Savings Bank |   | The State Bank of Chittenango         |   | New York               |
|                    |   |                                  |   |                   |
| The Oneida Savings Bank |   | Workplace Health Solutions Inc.       |   | New York               |
|                    |   |                                  |   |                   |
| The Oneida Savings Bank |   | Benefit Consulting Group Inc.         |   | New York               |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 12


                     COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Statements of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 ($ in millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Twelve Months                    Twelve Months
                                                        Ended March 31,                 Ended December 31,
                                                       -----------------   -----------------------------------------------
                                                         2001      2000      2000      1999      1998      1997      1996
                                                       -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
<S>                                                    <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>

Consolidated Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
before Income Taxes                                      555.7     547.5     485.0     565.9     461.1     397.0     325.8

Adjustments:
  Interest during construction                            (2.3)     (2.7)     (2.2)     (2.8)     (2.1)     (3.0)     (1.1)
  Distributed (Undistributed) equity income               (4.9)     (6.4)     (5.5)     (5.8)     (0.4)      3.6       1.5
  Fixed charges                                          191.8     192.0     192.8     183.8     163.3     180.5     183.7
                                                       -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
    Earnings Available                                   740.3     730.4     670.1     741.1     621.9     578.1     509.9
                                                       -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term and short-term debt              151.6     155.5     154.3     152.9     145.4     145.6     150.8
  Other interest                                          22.0      20.4      18.3      14.9       1.4      15.2      13.5
  Portion of rentals representing interest                18.2      16.1      20.2      16.0      16.5      19.7      19.4
                                                       -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
Total Fixed Charges                                      191.8     192.0     192.8     183.8     163.3     180.5     183.7
                                                       -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                        3.86      3.80      3.48      4.03      3.81      3.20      2.78
                                                       =======   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>


Prior periods have been restated to reflect discontinued operations.
Order entered September 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00820-CR

CESAR ARMIJO, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-80654-2014

ORDER

We GRANT Official Court Reporter Kimberly Tinsley’s September 14, 2015 request for 

an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due THIRTY 

DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the 

Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Redacted by the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the 

Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury


















Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Redacted by the 

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
EXHIBIT23.6




CONSENT OF PATRICE LIVE
   Alderon Iron Ore Corp.
 United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Dear Sirs:
  RE: ALDERON IRON ORE CORP.
  I, Patrice Live, Ing., Associate and Mining Engineer atBBA Inc. do hereby consent to filing of the following report.
  Reference is made to the technical report entitled “Feasibility Study of the Rose Deposit and Resource Estimate for the Mills Lake Deposit of the Kamistiatusset (Kami) Iron Ore Property, Labrador for Alderon Iron Ore Corp.”dated effective December 17, 2012, which the undersigned has co-authored on behalf of BBA Inc. for Alderon Iron Ore Corp. (the “Technical Report”).
  I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Alderon Iron Ore Corp., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Dated this 22ndday of March, 2013.
       “Patrice Live”Patrice Live

Ing.
#### Harvey Lee MILLER, Appellant v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

Certification of Principle Executive Officer and Principle Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Kevin J. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer and
President of Oritani Financial Corp., a Delaware Corporation (the Company) and John M. Fields, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has
reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) and that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: September 12, 2012 |  | /s/ Kevin J. Lynch                   
|                         |  | Kevin J. Lynch                       
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



|                         |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 12, 2012 |  | /s/ John M. Fields, Jr.                             
|                         |  | John M. Fields, Jr.                                 
|                         |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Emelina BOVASTRO, a/k/a Emelina Leon, Appellant, v. Robert J. LEWISON, Appellee.

No. 73-1172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Request for Additional Information

Agreement No.: 203-011075-041
Title: Central America Discussion Agreement
Parties:
    Concorde Shipping, Inc.
    Global Reefer Carriers Ltd.
    Dole Fresh Fruit
    King Ocean Central America, S.A.
    Crowley American Transport, Inc.
    Seaboard Marine, Ltd.
    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.
    NPR, Inc.
Synopsis: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Maritime Commission, 
pursuant to section 6(d) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 
1701-1720), has requested additional information from the parties to 
the Agreement as required by the Act. This action extends the review 
period as provided in section 6(c) of the Act

    Dated: November 28, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31671 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Ossen Innovation Co., Ltd. (the "Registrant") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date:  June 23, 2011




/s/ Wei HuaWei Hua(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

As of July 1, 2011, the following entities are subsidiaries of
DynaVox Inc.:



|                                    |  |                                             
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Name                                |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporationor
Organization
|DynaVox Systems Holdings LLC        |  | Delaware                                    
|DynaVox Intermediate LLC            |  | Delaware                                    
|DynaVox Systems LLC                 |  | Delaware                                    
|DynaVox Services Inc.               |  | Delaware                                    
|Blink-Twice LLC                     |  | Delaware                                    
|Mayer-Johnson LLC                   |  | Delaware                                    
|DynaVox FZ-LLC                      |  | United Arab Emirates                        
|DynaVox International Holdings Inc. |  | Delaware                                    
|DynaVox Systems Ltd.                |  | United Kingdom                              
|DynaVox Canada Inc.                 |  | Canada                                      
|DynaVox GmbH                        |  | Germany                                     
|DynaVox Norway AS                   |  | Norway                                      
|Eye Response Technologies, Inc.     |  | Virginia
No. 9247.

#### City of Toledo *v.*Lalond.

(Decided October 23, 1906.)

Error *to*Circuit Court of Lucas County.

*Mr. U. G. Denman; Mr. Charles K. Friedman*and *Mr. Frank G. Crane, for*plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Alonso G. Duer*and *Messrs. Kohn & North-up,*for defendant in error.

*578Judgment of the circuit court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew and Davis, JJ., concur.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlT** **’ ORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS** AUSTIN

Bonoroble 8. C. Branson Comdssioner, Dapartaent of' BenkIng Austin, reacaa

lo.hare your le

tho parpose of 

### loa of aloptiag u&or 8.8. Ho. 

### 6#Aaa oflQaQ* etlagexecuted

### byall*took

### add oorporatloa. A OertiPied copy OS the resothe stockboldors of the 

### l&r- & Employee Industzlal Bank, adopttfngthe powore provided ior 

### under 6. E. so. 268. '4. An af+fidavitof all the 6tock

### holdersof the Ksrcbante 0 Employes Industrial Bank to the effeof that the en-552

Hon. F* C. BmnBon - Pago 2

tire runrunt

uf' eei(Lcapital stook of eai&tor~rationaas eubearS.md 

### and aatua11g p&i in fn aaah. "5. **A** oert.iPl.oate **of the**  b&rchDntaE:P~legf3a kaa.Istria3u~ 06rtiqrsns. the mloption of the e&IA**tianal** pev5m ae pm~idod for uear 8. B. NO. 268, b&n&$ it copy of the aertifloato of authovity esaeutoabg aw.3 ae zumd.ng 

### Goszaissioner of this **state,** oereifying mat the ftwahante &&qloyeslnBu8~rXalPFulkis&Puly lriaorpwdi~, snd ds antitled ,*o8xeraiso, not only the pmer5 **granted to**  it luxler its ol%giat%l lat%rter, but 

### Aa adrllffoa

tbamto, all the pouarsproviaoafor under 8.B .268. 'I hare mada the investigation ElYl oonolwle that the elltlre anw?mt of tho Ca@81 stock of saU Wank hrra been poia in in f'nllin sabh.

*I, Has the Ee~haxrbs dtSa8"oyoo fndustriElBanlt&i eoti?elp aaoptd the a&IStonal 31" or0 proeaea ior and au orieed UrxlQr6. B. **No. 088,**  **46th** L5gitialatnre, A&s of the LO&F$8lEtur8 of t&m state of TexaSI hJnmaatory of hrtiol% 646, 8oQtLon 2, Title 18, of the Revimd 

### Giztut-sa

of Texas?%o4~0 exfube~ the instrilmnts 

### rzforrd

to in your lottoran d attoohod as esllibitsthereto, anrlfIna the sm to bo in ;xopsr Porn anA =ltogothor sufficient for the lxqmes intended.

This jlepartmnt is of the opi'nionXcrchantr ::alployoG Itiustrinl EOICL'; hno cffectiooly C.&GptOfi th0 dt,iG!ULl pOVol?s FOVidGz Oti nuthorizod t0 SOoallod tirrie Plan Baum Luxler6. E. 206, 46th Logisloeuro. The 6epY‘tmnt is further of tho Opinion that the kiQrGhE?lt6 & &Jplo3-'os lzdustrinl &ml; having &opt&I thOs0 power6 is noe a lo@lly organize6 bank u&w the laws of this Stetz, dth power, mm& others, *to 

### rcoeivomrm3~ on tl= d~pOsits.a

Truotin~ t&at m;ic Fill lxlvcansaerod YGUr puostions satlsfectorily, we are



### OS-A!H
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0030

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CORENA MARIE MOUNTAIN CHIEF,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 24, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2021

04/20/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0030