alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,750-01

EX PARTE ROBERT CHARLES ATLAS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-372-W011802-1429689-A IN THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Second

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Atlas v. State, No. 02-15-00380-CR (Tex. App.—Ft.

Worth, June 29, 2017). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that appellate counsel was ineffective because he failed to timely file a

PDR. Based on the record, the trialcourt has determined that appellate counsel’s performance denied

Applicant the opportunity to file a PDR.

Relief is granted. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time

PDR of the judgment ofthe Second Court of Appealsin case number 02-15-00380-CR that affirmed
2

his conviction in Cause No. 1429689 from the 372nd District Court of Tarrant County. Applicant

shall file his PDR with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: October 21, 2020

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 12



CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)



_____________________________________________________________________________
Twelve Months to September 30                                            1997
_____________________________________________________________________________
Earnings:
  Net income................................................         $302,988
  Add income taxes..........................................          152,467
                                                                     ________
    Income before income taxes..............................          455,455
  Distributed income from unconsolidated investees,
    less equity in earnings thereof.........................           (1,731)

                                                                     ________
    Subtotal................................................          453,724
                                                                     ________

  Add fixed charges:
    Interest on long-term debt, including amortization
      of debt discount and expense less premium.............          105,982
    Other interest expense..................................            7,126
    Portion of rentals deemed to be representative
      of the interest factor................................            9,196
    Fixed charges associated with 50% projects with debt....            2,041
                                                                     ________
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES.........................................          124,345
                                                                     ________
TOTAL EARNINGS..............................................         $578,069
                                                                     ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES..........................             4.65
                                                                     ========
_____________________________________________________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-02-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-29-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-03-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             584
<SECURITIES>                                       478
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,236
<PP&E>                                          19,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,985
<BONDS>                                          2,500
<COMMON>                                         2,004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,297
<SALES>                                         12,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,018
<CGS>                                            9,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    771
<INCOME-TAX>                                       284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
257 La. 259

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leo LOZART v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 51037.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted:

Petitioner contends that his court-appointed counsel neglected to take an appeal despite petitioner’s request for same after his conviction. The trial court points out circumstances indicating the incredibility of this belated claim. Nevertheless, the allegations of the petition require an evidenti-ary hearing, as raising a prima facie case of denial of constitutional right. La.Code Crim.P. Art. 354. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Evidentiary hearing on the allegations of the petition is therefore ordered.

On considering the petition of relator in the above numbered and entitled cause:

IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable Earl Edwards, Judge of the Twelfth Judicial District Court, Parish of Avoyelles, without delay, grant a full evidentiary hearing on relator’s petition for a writ of ha-beas corpus filed in that Court and in this Court, and make a determination of the merits of his application after the hearing.

Granted by the Court at New Orleans, Louisiana, January 5, 1971.
#### William MARKHAM, as Tax Assessor of Broward County, Florida, et al., Appellants, v. Samuel ADLER, Trustee, and Bank of Commerce of Florida, Appellees.

No. 71-1041.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 provided the U.S. Department of the Treasury $9 billion for the 

Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) to provide direct investments into Community Development 

Financial Institution (CDFI) and Minority Depository Institution (MDI) banks, credit unions and holding companies. 

These investments are designed to support the efforts of community financial institutions to, among other things, 

provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small and minority-owned businesses and consumers, especially in lowincome and financially underserved communities that struggled the most during the COVID-19 crisis.

These mission-driven financial institutions specialize in delivering responsible capital, credit and financial services 

to underserved communities. The investments made by Treasury are expected to be used for a range of 

community investments, including loans to low-income and minority borrowers and underserved small business, 

the development and preservation of affordable housing, and investments in community development projects.

Emergency Capital Investment Program Fact Sheet

Alabama

 

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/emergency-capital-investment-program

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email ecip@treasury.gov for additional information

Treasury has awarded institutions headquartered within Alabama over 

$274 million in ECIP investment funds. 

Institution Headquarters City Type Award Amount 

First Vernon Bancshares, Inc. Vernon CDFI $ 31,850,000 

Five Star Credit Union Dothan CDFI $ 50,000,000 

Merchants & Farmers Bancshares, Inc. Eutaw CDFI $ 8,500,000 

Moundville Bancshares, Inc. Moundville CDFI $ 16,662,000 

SNB Holdings, Inc. Slocomb CDFI $ 27,353,000 

Southern Independent Bancshares, Inc. Opp CDFI $ 16,300,000 

United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc. Atmore CDFI $ 123,750,000 

Note: Headquarters City indicates institution headquarters location only. Institution's lending activity may go beyond identified city.
Western Massachusetts Electric CompanyExhibit 12Ratio of Earnings to Fixed ChargesSix Months(Thousands of Dollars)EndedJune 30, 2009For the Years Ended December 31,(unaudited)20082007200620052004Earnings, as defined:Net income$11,953$18,330$23,604$15,644$15,085$12,373Income tax expense7,79310,54514,5867,7669,2947,187Equity in (earnings)/losses of regional nucleargenerating companies(47)(101)(526)241(311)(149)Dividends received from regional equity investees419-701372103687Fixed charges, as below10,44321,91022,16221,08719,80117,156Less: Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)(138)(1,010)(983)(853)(455)(220)Total earnings, as defined$30,423$49,674$59,544$44,257$43,517$37,034Fixed charges, as defined:Interest on long-term debt (a)$6,997$13,244$11,577$10,671$9,535$6,655Interest on rate reduction bonds2,2805,1335,8396,7237,5708,332Other interest (b)3941,2562,4301,5071,041782Rental interest factor6341,2671,3331,3331,2001,167Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)1381,010983853455220Total fixed charges, as defined$10,443$21,910$22,162$21,087$19,801$17,156Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges2.912.272.692.102.202.16(a)
Interest on long-term debt amounts include amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness.(b)
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008, other interest includes interest related to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109."
EXHIBIT 11
                          CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                              AND SUBSIDIARIES

                     Computation of Earnings Per Share


                         Three Months Ended June 30    Six Months Ended June 30
                         --------------------------    ------------------------
                            1999           1998          1999          1998
                            ----           ----          ----          ----

Computation of share
totals used in
computing earnings
per share:

Weighted average number
 of shares outstanding     9,344,207      9,216,723     9,331,927    9,156,073

Basic average shares

a-Outstanding              9,344,207      9,216,723      9,331,927   9,156,073

Incremental shares
 arising, from out-
 standing stock
 options                      46,916        47,945         58,947      48,458
                           ---------     ---------      ---------   ---------

 b-Totals                  9,391,123     9,264,668      9,390,874   9,204,531
                           =========     =========      =========   =========

c-Net Income              $9,136,224  $  3,190,744   $ 12,999,695  $6,320,994
                           =========     =========     ==========   =========

Net Income Per Share
 Basic - c/a              $      .98  $        .35           1.39         .69
                           =========     =========     ==========   =========

Net Income Per Share
assuming full dilution c/b $     .97  $        .34           1.39         .69
                          ==========     =========     ==========   ==========
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RAY JAMES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3979

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 1, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine

Thomas, Judge.

Ray James, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See §§ 961.02(7), 961.03(1)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. (2018); James v. 

State, 241 So. 3d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (table decision).

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON,JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 209 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 209

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, as the ``Lance 
           Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2021

 Mr. Kelly of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. Guest, and Mr. Thompson of 
 Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, as the ``Lance 
           Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL MARC LUCAS TUCKER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement No. 333-162246 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 11, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

*/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP*

New York, New York 

March 11, 2011
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Equity 500 Index Fund, a series of DWS Institutional Funds, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| August 25, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark                                            |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|            | Michael G. Clark                                               |
|            | President                                                      |
|            | DWS Equity 500 Index Fund, a series of DWS Institutional Funds |

 

 

----
Exhibit 99.1


                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Utilities (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Michael G. Morris,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John H.
Forsgren, Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael G. Morris
    -----------------------------------------------
    (Signature)
    Michael G. Morris
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ John H. Forsgren
    -----------------------------------------------
    (Signature)
    John H. Forsgren
    Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President
    and Chief Financial Officer

August 7, 2002
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conolog Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Robert S. Benou Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company and Marc Benou, the Chief Operating Officer, President and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been  provided to Conolog Corporation and will be retained by Conolog Corporation  and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. 

 

 

| Dated: June 13, 2006 | /s/ Robert Benou                                                                                      |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:  Robert Benou

Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                 |  

                                                                                         |
| Dated: June 13, 2006 | /s/ Marc Benou                                                                                        |
|                 | Name:  Marc Benou

Title:  Chief Operating Officer, President and Secretary                           |

                

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40701

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

BENJAMIN RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-880

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benjamin Rodriguez-Rodriguez challenges the sentence imposed 

following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 

8 U.S.C. 1326. He claims the district court erroneously imposed a 16-level 

enhancement, pursuant to Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), based on his 

2001 Texas conviction for possession of a controlled substance, with intent to 

deliver. 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 12, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40701 Document: 00513076505 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2015
No. 14-40701

2

Although post-Booker, the Guidelines are advisory only, and a properly 

preserved objection to an ultimate sentence is reviewed for reasonableness 

under an abuse-of-discretion standard, the district court must still properly 

calculate the advisory Guidelines-sentencing range for use in deciding on the 

sentence to impose. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). In that 

respect, for issues preserved in district court, its application of the Guidelines 

is reviewed de novo; its factual findings, only for clear error. E.g., United States 

v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008).

Rodriguez first contends that, because his state conviction could have 

been obtained under Texas law by administration of a controlled substance, it 

does not constitute a drug trafficking offense for purposes of the enhancement. 

As he concedes, this claim is foreclosed by United States v. Teran-Salas, 767 

F.3d 453, 458-62 (5th Cir. 2014).

He additionally claims, for the first time on appeal, that the court plainly 

erred by applying the enhancement because, under Texas law, delivery of a 

controlled substance does not require proof of commercial activity or 

remuneration, and, thus, does not fall within the ordinary meaning of a drug 

trafficking offense. This claim is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 

782 F.3d 198, 205 (5th Cir. 2015).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-40701 Document: 00513076505 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2015