Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 1997 / Notices 63931

of the ICA, and such other relief as may

be appropriate in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said complaint should file a

motion to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 214

and 211 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214,

385.211. All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before December

22, 1997. Protests will be considered by

the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. Answers

to this complaint shall be due on or

before December 22, 1997.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–31648 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP95–136–008]

Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Refund Report

November 26, 1997.

Take notice that on November 21,

1997, Williams Natural Gas Company

(WNG) tendered for filing a report of

refunds made to customers on

November 6 and 11, 1997.

WNG states that pursuant to

Commission order issued October 22,

1997, in Docket No. RP95–136–007, it is

filing a report of additional refunds to

KMGA and City Utilities of Springfield,

including applicable interest through

November 6, 1997. In addition to

amounts withheld for past due PODB

penalties in Docket No. RP95–136, WNG

states that it also refunded to KMGA

amounts WNG had withheld for past

due PODB penalty amounts from the

GRI refund made August 22, 1996, in

Docket No. RP96–143.

On November 11, 1997, WNG states

that it also made refunds to certain other

customers whose refund in RP95–136

was offset by past due PODB penalty

amounts.

WNG states that a copy of its filing

was served on all participants listed on

the service list maintained by the

Commission in the docket referenced

above and on interested state

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed on or before December 4, 1997.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–31652 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP96–387–004]

Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas

Tariff

November 26, 1997.

Take notice that on November 21,

1997, Williams Natural Gas Company

(WNG) tendered for filing as part of its

FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets

to be effective November 1, 1997:

Substitute First Revised Sheet Nos. 103 and

112

Second Substitute First Revised Sheet No.

229B

WNG states that this filing is being

made to comply with the October 22,

1997, order on rehearing in Docket No.

RP96–387–002. WNG was required to

file within 30 days of the date of

issuance of the order revised tariff

sheets to: (1) continue the existing 5%

tolerance level at receipt points, and (2)

continue the existing tariff provision

under Rate Schedules TSS and STS that

the 1⁄3–2⁄3 ratio of flowing supplies to

storage withdrawals applies only when

deliveries are at the MDTQ.

WNG states that a copy of its filing

was served on all participants listed on

the service list maintained by the

Commission in the docket referenced

above and on all jurisdictional

customers and interested state

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed as provided in Section 154.210 of

the Commissions Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceedings.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–31654 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. DR98–6–000, et al.]

Interstate Power Company, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

November 24, 1997.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Interstate Power Company

[Docket No. DR98–6–000]

Take notice that on November 14,

1997, Interstate Power Company

(Interstate), filed an Application for

approval of depreciation rates pursuant

to Section 302 of the Federal Power Act

and Rule 204 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure.

Comment date: December 19, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. KLT Power Inc.

[Docket No. EG98–1–000]

On November 21, 1997, KLT Power

Inc. (Applicant), whose business

address is 1201 Walnut, Kansas City,

MO 64106 filed with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission an amendment

to its application for determination of

exempt wholesale generator status

pursuant to Part 365 of the

Commission’s Regulations.

Comment date: December 15, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the amended

application.