alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 6493** 

RENE FERNANDEZ GARCIA ,

P etitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever, III , Chief District Judge. ( 5 :1 3

- hc

- 0 2182

- D )

Submitted : October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rene Fernandez Garcia , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Rene Fernandez Garcia , a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Garcia v. United States , No. 5:13

- hc

- 02182

- D (E.D.N.C.

Mar. 20, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Pr opo s e d R u l e : M a n d a t o r y Re p o r t i n g o f G r ee n h o u s e G a s E m i s s i o n s M ee ti n g D o c u m e n t a t i o n M ee t i n g s w i t h I n t e l

D at e S ta ff C o n ta ct I n fo r m a ti o n ( N am e , e m a i l

, p h o n e # ) N am e of O r g a n i z a ti o n ( A t t a c h li s t of all a t

t e n d ee s n am e s a n d

e mail s i f p o ss i b l e ) S u m ma r y o f D i s c u ss i o n ( e

. g

. , a p p l i c a b il it y ,
r e p o r t i n g r e q

u i r e m e n t s , e t c .) W r i tt e n C o mm e n t s P r ov i d e d ?
D i d t h e y al s o

s u b mit t o D o c k e t ? D at e s e n t t o

E PA

- CC D

D i s c u ss i o n s f r o m O c t o b e r 2009 t o M a r c h 2010

. K i r s t e n C a pp e l

,

c a pp e l

. k i r s t e n @ e

p a. gov , ( 202 ) 343

- 9556 I n t e l :

• T i m H i g g s ( ti m

. g

. h i g g s @ i n t e l .c o m)

• D a v i d H a r m a n ( d a v i d

. e

. h a r m a n @ i n t e l .c o m)

• E P A a nd E P A c o n t r a c t o r s D i s c u ss i o n s i n c l u d e d :

• M e t ho d s f

o r t r a c k i n g g a s

c o n s u m p t i o n a nd h ee l f

a c t o r s ;

• R e f i n e m e n t o f p r o c e ss c a t e g o r i e s ;

• C h a r a c t e

r i z i n g e mi s s i o n s f

r o m p r o c e s s e s ; a nd

• M e t ho d s f

o r m e a s u r i n g a b a t e m e n t

s y s t e m d e s t r u c t i o n o r r e m o v a l

e f f i c i e n c y

.

A dd i ti o n a l i n f

o r m a ti o n o n p r o c e ss

c a t e g o r i e s p r o v i d e d v i a e m a i l i s i n c l u d e d i n t h e d o c k e t

. N A M a r c h 15

, 2010
#### Elizabeth E. GOMEZ, Appellant, v. Wilfred Victor KELLY et al., Appellees.

No. 70-554.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 30, 1971.

Jack F. White, Jr., of White & Mahorner, Clearwater, for appellant.

Luke R. Kaleel of Kaleel, Kaleel & Ka-leel, St. Petersburg, for appellees.

McNULTY, Judge.

Reversed on authority of Gates v. Foley, Supreme Court of Florida, 247 So.2d 40, Opinion filed April 7, 1971.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.
256 La. 356

#### Thomas J. CATALANOTTO v. TAC AMUSEMENT COMPANY.

No. 50569.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1970.

In re: Thomas J. Catalanotto applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 232 So.2d 843.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the judgment complained of is correct.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2247 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2247

     To require in-State tuition rates for qualifying foster youth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

  Mr. Pocan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require in-State tuition rates for qualifying foster youth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John Lewis Foster Youth Tuition 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. IN-STATE TUITION RATES FOR QUALIFYING FOSTER YOUTH.

    Section 477(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(b)(3)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(L) A certification by the chief executive 
                officer of the State that the State will not charge 
                youths eligible for services under the State program of 
                any State under this section tuition for attendance at 
                a public institution of higher education (as defined in 
                section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965) or a 
                postsecondary vocational institution (as defined in 
                section 102(c) of such Act) in the State at a rate that 
                is greater than the rate charged for residents of the 
                State for such attendance.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 00-7327.

#### Romero *v.*Battles, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2213 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to vehicle weight 

limitations for certain logging vehicles, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2021 

Mr. GALLAGHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to 

vehicle weight limitations for certain logging vehicles, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Routes Act of 

5 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VEHICLE WEIGHT EXEMPTIONS. 

7 Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(v) CERTAIN LOGGING VEHICLES.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2213 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall waive, 

2 with respect to a covered logging vehicle, the appli3 cation of any vehicle weight limit established under 

4 this section. 

5 ‘‘(2) COVERED LOGGING VEHICLE DEFINED.— 

6 In this subsection, the term ‘covered logging vehicle’ 

7 means a vehicle that— 

8 ‘‘(A) is transporting raw or unfinished for9 est products, including logs, pulpwood, biomass, 

10 or wood chips; 

11 ‘‘(B) is traveling a distance not greater 

12 than 150 air miles on the Interstate from origin 

13 to a storage or processing facility; and 

14 ‘‘(C) meets State legal weight tolerances 

15 and vehicle configurations for transporting raw 

16 or unfinished forest products within the State 

17 boundaries in which the vehicle is operating. 

18 ‘‘(3) APPLICATION OF WEIGHT TOLERANCES.— 

19 The waiver in this subsection shall only apply with 

20 respect to a State legal weight tolerance in effect on 

21 the date of enactment of this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7419

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DILADE MCCOY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:14-cr-00044-DJN-2)

Submitted: June 29, 2021 Decided: July 1, 2021

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dilade McCoy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dilade McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motions 

seeking compassionate release or, alternatively, that the court recommend to the Bureau of 

Prisons that McCoy serve the rest of his sentence on home confinement. Having reviewed 

the record and finding no reversible error, we affirm the decision of the district court. 

United States v. McCoy, No. 3:14-cr-00044-DJN-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2020). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Columbus Southern Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Michael G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








October
31, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, David A. Shadduck, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TruServ Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
TruServ as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. TruServ's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for TruServ and we have:

         a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to TruServ, including its consolidated
         subsidiaries, is made known to us, particularly during the period in
         which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b. evaluated the effectiveness of TruServ's disclosure controls and
         procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
         quarterly report and;

         c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on such
         evaluation as of the evaluation date;

5. TruServ's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation to TruServ's auditors and the audit committee of TruServ's
board of directors:

         a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls, which could adversely affect TruServ's ability to record,
         process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
         TruServ's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in TruServ's internal
         controls; and

6. TruServ's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

TRUSERV CORPORATION

Date: November 12, 2003

By /s/ DAVID A. SHADDUCK
   ---------------------
   David A. Shadduck
   Senior Vice President and
   Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4235-N-32]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Johnston, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7256, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1226; TDD number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
Fred Karnas, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 97-31492 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund 

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001

Checklist Item #4 – 2.04 Acknowledgment of Public Disclosure

Does the application include a statement, signed by an authorized trustee on behalf of the 

board of trustees, acknowledging that the application and the application’s supporting 

material will be publicly disclosed on the Treasury Department’s website? 

See Section 2.04

Yes. The required statement is attached as Document No. 4.1.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1426 CA 14-01934**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.

JOSEPH F. BORRELLI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
CHRISTINA BORRELLI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

CHARLES W. ROGERS, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
NIGOS KARATAS, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered June 3, 2014. The order denied plaintiff’s motion seeking to reopen the proof in this divorce action. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 23, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
256 La. 341

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gent G. ALLEN.

No. 50200.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

*491Ford E. Stinson, Benton, for defendant-appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., William P. Schuler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Louis H. Padgett, Jr., Dist. Atty., Rogers M. Prestridge, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

SUMMERS, Justice.

Appellant Gent G. Allen was prosecuted by bill of information for having committed aggravated assault on July 12, 1969 upon the person of Jack D. Hutchinson. The statute defining the offense and providing the penalty is Article 37 of the Louisiana Criminal Code:

> Aggravated assault is an assault committed with a dangerous weapon.

> Whoever commits an aggravated assault shall be fined not more than three hundred dollars, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.

Appellant was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve six months in jail. His appeal to this Court was granted. The district attorney filed a motion to dismiss, alleging that this Court had no jurisdiction, for the Constitution limits the appellate jurisdiction of the Court to “Criminal cases in which the penalty of death or imprisonment at hard labor may be imposed, or in which a fine exceeding three hundred dollars or *imprisonment exceeding six months*has been actually imposed.” La.Const. art. 7 § 10 (emphasis added).

The appeal should be dismissed on the grounds set forth in the motion: the imprisonment does not exceed six months. Appellant’s remedy, if any, is to apply to this Court for writs under our supervisory jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.
### i^'ARTMENTO F v.iSf'ORTATIO N :•.': < OPERATION S i- l n di ! P^ 1

4 0 SERVE D FEBRUR

Y11 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH EMATTE RO F SKY KING , INC . FAADOCKETNO . CP10NM001 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DMSNO . FAA-2010-121 6 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s FA A Cas e No . 2010WP250029 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . All future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , andth e other

person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t 3nnie A . Yoder ,

Chie f Administrativ e h ^ Jj/dg e.. ? i. . 1 FA A Docke t

No . CP1ONMOO1 4 [ | (Civi l Penalty Action ) ] i SERVIC E LIS T ^ h ORIGINA!^ * mi E COP Y l ^ Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 ? 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . | ' Washington , D C 2059 1 | . Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 PI Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' |

ON ECOP Y I ; Greg g P . Lukenbil , Agen t for Servic e ATTN : Stephe n A . Badger , V PFligh t Operation s andDirecto r

o f Safet y andSecurity Sk y King , Inc . 360 0 Powe r

Inn Road , Suit e H Sacramento , C A 9582 6 TEL : 916-454-240 0 FAX : 916-737-896 0 Lis aJ . Toscano , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 0 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t 202-366-753 6 Fa x

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 80

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
No. DA 20-0431

__________________________________________________________________ STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. HEATHER ARLETA CALLANTINE, Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER

__________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s MOTION FOR EXTENSION of time, no objections from the State, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time until, and including, December 15, 2021 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 9 2021

11/09/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0431
**Exhibit      32**

| 1. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006                (the                “Report”) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully                complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or                78o(d)). |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of March 31, 2006 and for the period then                ended. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Thomas                F. Farrell, IIThomas                F. Farrell, IIPresident                and Chief Executive OfficerMay                2, 2006 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Thomas                N. ChewningThomas                N. ChewningExecutive                Vice President and Chief                Financial Officer May                2, 2006 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|