alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2036 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation 

with the Secretary of State, to formulate a strategy for entering into 

agreements with foreign countries to develop and commercialize new 

drugs to address pandemics, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mr. LEVIN of California (for himself and Mr. FERGUSON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

in consultation with the Secretary of State, to formulate 

a strategy for entering into agreements with foreign 

countries to develop and commercialize new drugs to 

address pandemics, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving Us from Pan5 demic Era Resistance by Building a Unified Global Strat6 egy Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘SUPER BUGS Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2036 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 

2 NEW DRUGS TO ADDRESS PANDEMICS. 

3 (a) STRATEGY.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 12 months 

5 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec6 retary of Health and Human Services, in consulta7 tion with the Secretary of State, shall— 

8 (A) formulate a strategy for entering into 

9 agreements with foreign countries to help to de10 velop and commercialize (including through 

11 contracts with the private sector) new drugs to 

12 address pandemics, including antimicrobial 

13 drugs; and 

14 (B) submit such strategy to the Congress. 

15 (2) CONTENTS.—The strategy under paragraph 

16 (1) shall— 

17 (A) provide for the harmonization of agree18 ments and contracts described in paragraph 

19 (1)(A); 

20 (B) allow such countries to emphasize na21 tional or regional issues of importance; and 

22 (C) provide for collaboration among such 

23 countries, so as to allocate joint or individual 

24 responsibility across such countries for the de25 velopment and commercialization of particular 

26 drugs. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2036 IH

1 (b) AGREEMENTS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES.—The 

2 Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation 

3 with the Secretary of State, shall seek to enter into agree4 ments with foreign countries to implement the strategy 

5 under subsection (a). 

6 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘anti7 microbial drug’’ means— 

8 (1) an antibiotic drug, as defined in section 

9 201(jj) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

10 Act (21 U.S.C. 321(jj)); or 

11 (2) a biological product, as defined in section 

12 351(i) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

13 262(i)), that exhibits antimicrobial activity. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# ISR B&HC
Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have

no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on

the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 95-20154

(Summary Calendar)

_______________

ESEQUIEL RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

_______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-89-4083)

_______________________________________________

November 14, 1995

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner Esequiel Rodriguez appeals from the district

court's order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order.

We dismiss the appeal as frivolous.

Rodriguez was convicted of attempted murder in a Texas state

court and sentenced to life imprisonment. The district court

granted Rodriguez's federal petition for habeas corpus, set aside
-2-

his sentence, and remanded to the state court for resentencing.

Respondent Wayne Scott filed a timely notice of appeal. Asserting

that the State of Texas has no right of appeal in habeas corpus

cases, Rodriguez filed a motion for a temporary restraining order

to prevent Scott from appealing the district court's grant of

habeas relief. The district court denied Rodriguez's motion, and

Rodriguez filed a timely notice of appeal.

We regularly entertain appeals in federal habeas cases where

the state is the appellant. See, e.g., Cupit v. Whitley, 28 F.3d

532 (5th Cir. 1994) (vacating district court's grant of habeas

relief upon appeal by State of Louisiana). In fact, such appeals

are specifically contemplated by FED. R. APP. P. 22(b), which

excuses a state or its representative, when appealing in federal

habeas cases, from the certificate of probable cause requirement.

The state court cases cited by Rodriguez, concerning a state's

right of appeal in state habeas proceedings, are not applicable to

federal habeas proceedings, which are governed by federal law.

Because this appeal is without arguable merit, it is DISMISSED

as frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Further, we warn Rodriguez that

any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf may

be met with appropriate sanction, in accordance with FED. R. APP.

P. 38.
#### Yinto BEJAR and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Zenaida GARCIA, Appellee.

No. 77-1283.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 7, 1978.

*965Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, for appellants.

Richard B. Burke, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

HUBBART, Judge.

By this interlocutory appeal, we are asked to review an order denying the defendant Yinto Bejar’s motion to quash service of process upon him as a non-resident of Florida in an action filed before the Dade County Circuit Court. The plaintiff Zenaida Garcia alleged in her complaint that she was injured in an automobile accident when her motor vehicle collided with a vehicle driven by the defendant Bejar in Dade County, Florida, The defendant Be-jar joined by his insurer State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company contends on appeal that the purported service upon him as a non-resident was defective under Sections 48.161, 48.171, Florida Statutes (1975). We agree.

The plaintiff Garcia did not make a proper showing that she sent as required by law a notice of service and a copy of the process to the defendant Bejar by registered or certified mail as evidenced by the defendant’s return receipt. *Leviten v. Gaunt,*347 So.2d 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Zarcone v. Lesser,*190 So.2d 805 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); *Lendsay*v. *Cotton,*123 So.2d 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). Moreover, the plaintiff Garcia also failed to allege in her complaint as required by law that the defendant Bejar as the driver of one of the automobiles involved in the accident was a non-resident of Florida sufficient to invoke personal jurisdiction over said defendant. See *Palmer Johnson Yachts v. Ray Richard, Inc.,*347 So.2d 779 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Joyce Bros. Storage and Van Co. v. Piechalak,*343 So.2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Esberger v. First Florida Business Consultants, Inc.,*338 So.2d 561 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). Both of the above deficiencies are fatal to the purported service of process in this cause. The order under review is accordingly reversed.

Reversed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6027

RONALD L. HARPER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MARK HENRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 4024-MJG) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald L. Harper, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the order from which Harper appeals was filed on December 15, 1998, it was entered on the district court’s docket sheet on December 16, 1998. December 16, 1998, is therefore the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Ronald L. Harper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant in forma pauperis status and affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Harper v. Henry, No. CA-98-4024-MJG (D. Md. Dec. 16, 1998). * See also Pelissero v. Thompson , ___ F.3d ___, 1999 WL 133112 (4th Cir. Mar. 12, 1999) (No. 97-6156). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-749V

Filed: March 4, 2016

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

GARY BONDI, *

*

Petitioner, *

*

v. * Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza

* Vaccination; Guillain-Barré Syndrome. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

John R. Howie, Jr., Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for petitioner.

Gordon E. Shemin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master:

Gary Bondi [“petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine 

Injury Compensation Program2on July 17, 2015. Petitioner alleges that he developed GuillainBarré Syndrome [“GBS”] as a result of an influenza [“flu”] on September 26, 2013. See 

Stipulation, filed March 4, 2016, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that the flu immunizations caused 

petitioner’s injury and/or any other injury or his current condition. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On March 4, 2016, the parties 

filed a joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A, agreeing to settle this case and 

describing the settlement terms. 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this 

decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 

codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days 

to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted 

decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will 

delete such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of 

citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
2

Respondent agrees to issue the following payments:

(1) A lump sum of $265,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This 

amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 

§ 300aa-15(a). 

Stipulation at ¶ 8.

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount 

and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in 

accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth

Mindy Michaels Roth

Special Master

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the 

right to seek review.
#### Robert Lee MACK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42860.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 27, 1972.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. JOSUE MANUEL JAQUEZ , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 21

- 0008 PRPC

Appeal from the Superior Court in Mohave County

CR2016

- 00656 The Honorable Richard D. Lambert , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Josue Manuel Jaquez , Winslow Petitioner Mohave County Attorney’s Office , Kingman By Matthew J. Smith C ounsel for Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION
Chief Judge Kent E. Cattani, Judge Samuel A. Thumma and Judge Brian Y. Furuya delivered the decision of the Court

. FILED 7-15-2021STATE v. JAQUEZ Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Josue Manuel Jaquez seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Jaquez’ first petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ari z. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petiti on for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find the petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
Exhibit 23.3





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our reports i) dated April 2, 2015 with respect to the combined financial statements of IHP I Owner JV, LLC (a Delaware limited liability company) and Affiliates and ii) dated April 2, 2015 with respect to the combined financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and the period from June 9, 2014 to December 31, 2014 of INK Acquisition, LLC (a Delaware limited liability company) and Affiliates, which are included in the Annual Report of Chatham Lodging Trust on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2014.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Chatham Lodging Trust on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-193389 and 333-193390) and Form S-8 (No. 333-166258).











/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


April 2, 2015
Treasury approves South Dakota’s plan to invest $8 million of CPF funding 

in a multi-purpose community facility to improve resources for 

communities that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

South Dakota

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $8 million for a Multi-Purpose Community Facility (7% of CPF allocation)

 Program Description: The construction of an addition to the

current Black Hills State University-Rapid City (BHSU-RC) facility

will house the West River Health Sciences Center (WRHSC) and

the South Dakota State University (SDSU) Nursing programs and

provide a flexible learning space to be used for health

science-related fields and to host a variety of programs and

educational events that draw community members to campus to

promote education, workforce, and economic development for the region. The facility will provide 

the community with free Wi-Fi and laptops available for checkout for conducting job searches, 

preparing and submitting job applications, developing one’s resume, conducting online interviews 

and short-term or emergency remote work should one’s internet be disrupted. Career counselors will 

be available to assist with job searches, job preparation, interviewing skills and other types of career 

readiness assistance. To support health monitoring for the community, the nursing program at SDSU 

provides numerous free healthcare clinics including free immunizations, free health screenings, free 

workshops on self-care and health monitoring.

 Key State Contact: The Office of the State Engineer 

South Dakota’s Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

The facility is designed 

to serve Western South 

Dakota, a population of 

more than 250,000 

individuals.
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with SB QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7 Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 

### 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. 

## FAA-::eetOlo -

# 07() 

# '-I With whom outside theFAA bas this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Pcrspn Contacted Date 

### Boeing Helen Biller 12//23/09 

### ATA JoeWhite 12/23/09

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master Us! to Verify That This isthe Correct Revision Before Use
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2208 

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 

are equal and fair, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2021 

Ms. ESCOBAR (for herself and Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development 

on terms that are equal and fair, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 

5 and Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair 

6 Opportunity Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

8 The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 

9 Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (Public 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2208 IH

1 Law 100–89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended by adding at the 

2 end the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

4 ‘‘Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude 

5 or limit the applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 

6 Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle & First Person View

Pre-Flight Checklist

Environmental

Check for people, animals, property in the flight vicinity

Notify any bystanders or nearby property owner of intentions

When flying FPV, discuss flight plan with check pilot, observers

If Flying in controlled airspace, notify airspace authority of intentions

Hardware/Equipment – VISUALLY CHECK THE AIRFRAME

Check for cracks (especially in high stress areas like joints)

Check for loose or damaged screws/fasteners/bands/straps/ties

Check for loose or damaged wiring

Check for loose or damaged connections (solder, plugs, etc.)

Inspect prop mounts & screws & apply slight counter pressure on arms to check for 

loosened construction

For FPV, inspect/clean FPV and/or Go Pro camera lens and ensure that camera is

secured

Check Battery/batteries are fully charged, properly seated and secured

Remove props and test fail-safe behavior (if applicable).

Check that Props are smooth and free of damage/defect (check blade, surface & hub)

Tighten prop adapters (do not over tighten which may damage prop)

Ensure voltage alarm is connected

Ensure arming/idle timeout is properly configured

Check whether the right model is selected in the transmitter (if applicable)

Check RC transmitter shows the right range and centering for all sticks

Pre-Flight Run Up – Power Up

Check batteries are charged & secured

Calibrate the Compass

Position quad-copter in a level, safe location for takeoff

For FPV, power up ground station, video receiver, goggles, etc.

Turn on Go Pro Camera

Check all transmitter controls move freely in all directions

Check all transmitter trims in neutral position

Check all transmitter switches in correct position

Transmitter throttle to zero

Radio transmitter is on

Connect/ power on battery to airframe

Ensure LED indicators & audible tones are all correct

Stand Clear – audibly, loudly announce the word “CLEAR”

Scan for nearby people, animals, low flying aircraft or obstacles

Arm Flight Controls
Pre-Take-Off

Increase throttle slightly listening for any abnormalities

Hover 20-30 seconds at 3 to 5 feet (listen for weird vibrations or anything that sounds 

loose)

Verify all sticks operate correctly while hovering at no higher than 10 feet

Pre-Landing Check

Ensure Camera is fully up

Landing Zone is clear and safe

Post-Landing Checklist – Returning to flight immediately

Battery – Removed and Replaced

Camera checked

Ensure LED indicators & audible tones are all correct

Stand Clear – audibly, loudly announce the word “CLEAR”

Scan for nearby people, animals, low flying aircraft or obstacles

End of Ops Checklist

Battery – Off

Transmitter – Off

Camera - Off
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-170-008]


Blue Lake Gas Storage Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 7, 1997, Blue Lake Gas Storage Company 
(Blue Lake) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the 
filing, to be effective November 1, 1997.
    Blue Lake states that the attached tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's Order issued on October 27, 1997 in 
the above captioned docket.
    Blue Lake states that copies of the filing was served upon the 
company's Jurisdictional customer.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30449 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 39

 40

 41

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL