alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-2-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          66,655
<SECURITIES>                                     1,349
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     86,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,568
<PP&E>                                         871,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 873,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,858
<BONDS>                                         62,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,737
<OTHER-SE>                                     662,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   873,473
<SALES>                                        312,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               312,755
<CGS>                                          106,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               152,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,060
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
#### J. B. SMITH v. SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT of Florida, and W. L. Wadsworth, Circuit Judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida.

No. 39351.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### Jerome DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2153.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

On Rehearing March 14, 1978.

Arthur J. Kutsche of Studstill & Kutsche, Titusville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Richard P. Zaretsky and Glenn H. Mitchell, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*816PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED upon authority of *Hornblower v. State,*351 So.2d 716 (Fla.1977).

DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Associate Judge, concur.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

On Petition for Rehearing appellant correctly points out that we affirmed this case per curiam upon authority of *Hornblower v. State,*351 So.2d 716 (Fla.1977), when it is quite obvious we intended to reverse the judgment appealed from.

Accordingly, our opinion in this case, dated January 24, 1978, is vacated and the order of probation appealed from is reversed upon authority of *Hornblower v. State, supra.*The cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to allow withdrawal of appellant’s plea of nolo conten-dere and for the trial court to enter an order granting appellant’s Motion to Suppress and for such further proceedings as are appropriate.

DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Associate Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-910-0777-74]


Committees, Establishment, Renewal, Termination, etc: Alaska 
Resource Advisory Council; Nominations

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Call for Nominations for Alaska Resource Advisory Council.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, is 
soliciting nominations for the Alaska Resource Advisory Council. The 
council provides advice and recommendations to BLM on land use planning 
and management of 90 million acres of public lands in Alaska. Public 
nominations will be considered for 30 days after the publication date 
of this notice.
    The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) directs the 
Secretary of the Interior to involve the public in planning and issues 
related to management of lands administered by BLM. Section 309 of 
FLPMA directs the Secretary to select 10--15 member citizen-based 
advisory councils as established and authorized under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. Council members represent the various interests 
concerned with the management of the public lands in Alaska. These 
include three categories:
    <bullet> Category One--Representatives of energy and mining 
development, timber industry, off-road vehicle use and developed 
recreation.
    <bullet> Category Two--Representatives of environmental and 
resource conservation organizations and archaeological or historic 
interests.
    <bullet> Category Three--Representatives of state and local 
government, Alaska Natives, academicians involved in natural sciences, 
and the public-at-large.
    BLM is currently seeking nominations to fill vacancies in 
categories one and two.
    Individuals may nominate themselves or others. Nominees must be 
residents of the State of Alaska, and will be evaluated on the basis of 
education, training, experience of the issues, and knowledge of 
Alaska's public lands. Nominees should have a demonstrated commitment 
to collaborative resource decision making. All nominations must be 
accompanied by letters of reference from represented interests or 
organizations and a completed nomination form.

ADDRESSES: To request a nomination package, contact External Affairs, 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 W. 7th Avenue, #13, Anchorage, AK 99513-
7599.

DATES: All nominations should be received on or before January 7, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa McPherson, Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, (907) 271-5555.

    Dated: November 24, 1997.
Tom Allen,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 97-32005 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
#### John J. O’BRIEN and Roberta V. O’Brien, his wife, Appellants, v. Alvah H. CHAPMAN, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-920.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0241 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMPSON ST. PIERRE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court Reporter Cindy Kennedy Prindiville is granted an extension of time to and including November 5 , 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 15 2020

09/15/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0241
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADELSO DANIEL BARRIOSCALDERON, AKA Adelso Daniel Barrios, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-73827 

Agency No. A070-819-144 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Adelso Daniel Barrios-Calderon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions 

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his 

motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73827 

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We review de 

novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. Simeonov v. 

Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Barrios-Calderon’s untimely 

motion to reopen because Barrios-Calderon failed to establish that he qualified for 

an exception to the time limitation for filing a motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 996 (9th Cir. 2008) (movant 

must produce material evidence that conditions in country of nationality had 

changed and establish a prima facie case for the relief sought). 

Barrios-Calderon’s contention that the BIA violated his right to due process 

fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (error required to 

prevail on a due process claim).

 The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Carl WILSON, Appellant, v. Harold R. ELLIOTT, Administrator of the Estate of Blanche Elliott Hall, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 75-1829.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 26, 1976.

Stuart E. Kocha and Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Culver Smith III, of Dell & Smith, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Miller v. Murray,*68 So.2d 594 (Fla.1953).

ALDERMAN, J., SMITH, ROBERT P., and COBB, WARREN H., Associate Judges, concur.
| Name                                             | Country of Incorporation         |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Rise King Management Limited                     | British Virgin Islands           |
| Sound Way Enterprises Limited                    | British Virgin Islands           |
| Brave King Enterprises Limited                   | Hong Kong                        |
| Major Aim Enterprises Limited                    | Hong Kong                        |
| Shanxi Shipaipu Business Consulting Co., Ltd.    | People’s Republic of China |
| Shanxi Ruixingtong Business Consulting Co., Ltd. | People’s Republic of China |
| Shanxi Guolian Pipe Industry Group Co., Ltd.     | People’s Republic of China |
| Shanxi Zhonglian Gas Development Co., Ltd.       | People’s Republic of China |
| Shanxi Guolian Spiral Tubulation Co., Ltd.       | People’s Republic of China |
| Xi’an Guolian Spiral Tubulation Co., Ltd   | People’s Republic of China |
| Shanxi Guolian Pipe Technology Co., Ltd.         | People’s Republic of China |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 203 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 203

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, as the ``Benny C. Martinez 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENNY C. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Benny C. Martinez Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Benny C. 
Martinez Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### TRANSIT HOMES, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. Pieter J. FETERIS et ux., and American Family Home Insurance Company, etc., Respondents.

No. 42859.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 27, 1972.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

June 15, 2016

MEMORANDUM

From: Andy Steckel, Chief

Air Division Rules Office

To: Kerry Drake, Associate Director

Air Division

Re: Summary of our 6/10/16 Discussion with Kevin Abernathy, Milk Producers

Council

Here are my notes from our discussion with Kevin Abernathy regarding dairy pract ices

in California . We initiated the call with Kevin , a long

- time representative of the dairy

industry in the San Joaquin Valley and a member of the USDA Agricultural Air Quality

Task Force

. You explained that we are collecting information to help respond to

comments received on our proposed action on the San Joaquin Valley’s ( SJV’s ) PM 2.5

P lan. All notes below are Kevin’s responses to our specific questions.

1. He believes 99.9% of South Coast Air Quality Management ( SCAQMD ) dairies are

dry scrape and not flush.

2. T here is not crop land associated with SCAQMD dairies where they could apply

manure.

3. When SC dairies moved to SJV , they became flush dairies, partly because flush is

more convenient tha n walking in large piles of manure, so long as you have nearby

crop land to dispose of the flushed manure.

4. M ost dairies in SJV are flush, and Kevin doesn’t know any that don ’t at least flush

where the cows eat, which is also where most manure is produced.

5. SC dairies mostly don’t have free stall barns like they do in SJV, partly because o f

the different weather

– it’s bad to leave dairy cows out in extended ra iny seasons.

6. SJV has a combination of corrals and barns; SC is predominantly corrals.

7. The majority (maybe 75%) of cows in SJV are in free stall barns.

8. SC dairies mostly send manure outside the District to be land applied , including to

Imperial and SJV.

9. It is generally not feasible to transport SJV manure outside of SJV , because the

manure is a valuable fertilizer for agricultural lands

. 10. Manure flushing in SJV is all electric , while manure removal in SC is done with

trucks and tractors

. 11. Some SJV dairies sto ckpile their manure on

- site for months. Most is composted and

then used as bedding for the cows or land applied later

. 12. Most stockpiles you see outside of corrals have been composted.

13. Dairies compost manure to create a pathogen

- free bedding.14. Kevin doesn’t believe any SJV dairies send manure to a manure processing facility.
Public Meeting

Wednesday, March 14, 2023

1:00 p.m. EDT – 4:00 p.m. EDT

Cash Room, Treasury Building

Call to Order

Tribal Opening

Remarks by Deputy Secretary Adewale "Wally" Adeyemo

Comments by Members of the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee (TTAC)

Remarks by Treasurer Chief Marilynn “Lynn” Malerba

Federal Agency Updates

Treasury/IRS Updates

TTAC Subcommittee Updates

1. General Welfare Exclusion

2. Dual Taxation

3. Tribal Pensions

Public Comments

Other Items

Close of Business 

Adjourn
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan totaling $7,100,000 to Meridian 

Rapid Defense Group, LLC (the Company), a business critical to maintaining national security

with approximately 14 U.S. employees in March 2020.

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(3) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is unsecured. It has an annual interest rate equal to 

LIBOR plus 5.5% and matures on October 30, 2025. Treasury funded the full loan amount at 

close. The loan proceeds will be used to provide liquidity to continue the Company’s operations. 

The transaction agreement includes covenants by the Company to comply with certain 

restrictions on employee compensation, stock repurchases, dividends, and reductions in 

employment levels, as required by the CARES Act. The loan constitutes senior indebtedness of 

the Company, and Treasury will receive 3% payment-in-kind annual interest on the loan in 

accordance with section 4003(d) of the CARES Act.
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/28

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★ ■

■

■

■

★

■

■

■

■

★ ●

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
Exhibit 31.2.2 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

CON EDISON OF NEW YORK—Principal Financial Officer 

 

I, Joan S. Freilich, the principal financial officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 of Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 5, 2004
#### FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF NORTH PALM BEACH, a Florida State Bank Corporation, Appellant, v. Robert H. FIELD, Appellee.

No. 2000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 1, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Earl BLANCHETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 51912.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 6, 1977.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Robert H. Grizzard, II, and James A. Cornelius, Asst. Public Defenders, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Johnson v. State,*314 So.2d 573 (Fla.1975).

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D24-0247 

LT Case No. 2014-CF-000187-A 

_____________________________ 

RIAD AKEL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. 

Mark Borello, Judge. 

Riad Akel, Daytona Beach, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

March 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

Bar Docket No. 7417

In the Matter of CHARLES. E. WORDEN,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISBARMENT

In a letter signed July 1, 2018, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 

respondent Charles E. Worden, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of 

Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to 

Supreme Court Rule 217 (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 261). 

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a disciplinary case was 

pending, alleging that the respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct

1.8(k) (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 309) (conflict of interest—prohibited relationship) and 8.4(d)

(2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 381) (professional misconduct—prejudicial to the administration of 

justice). 

This court finds that the surrender of the respondent's license should be accepted 

and that the respondent should be disbarred. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Charles E. Worden be and he is hereby disbarred 

from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are 

hereby revoked. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of 

Charles E. Worden from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, 

that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith 

shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 262). 

Dated this 10th day of July, 2018.