alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Dimitrios Argyros, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Euro Solar Parks, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Euro Solar Parks, Inc.Dated: April 12, 2011
By:
/s/ Dimitrios ArgyrosDimitrios ArgyrosChief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-957-1430-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plat, in 5 sheets, of the following described land was 
officially filed in the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 
Boise, Idaho, effective 9:00 a.m. January 29, 1997.
    The plat, in 5 sheets, representing the dependent resurvey of 
portions of the subdivisional lines, certain segregation and mineral 
surveys in sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 29, and the subdivision of 
section 20, the subdivision of section 19, and correcting geographic 
coordinate values for certain corners as shown in the field notes 
approved July 18, 1995, T. 48 N., R. 2 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group 
No. 859, was accepted January 29, 1997.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management. All inquires concerning the survey of 
the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, 
Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, 
Boise, Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief, Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-3203 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond G. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   March 19, 2015 |                   |                                    |
|-----------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        |                   |                                    |
|                        | /s/   Raymond G. Smith |
|                        | Name:                  | Raymond   G. Smith                      |
|                        | Title:                 | President   and Chief Executive Officer |
|                             |                        |                                         |  |

 

----
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com

 

** **

August 17, 2011

** **

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

Board of Directors

ePhoto Image, Inc.

Shunyi County, Beijing, China

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents tothe use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report under the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed by ePhoto Image,Inc. of our report dated August 16, 2011, relating to the financial statements of ePhoto Image, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, asof and for the years ending April 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from September 30, 2007 (date of inception) to April 30,2011.

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
#### F. A. CONNER, Appellant, v. G. H. McNEW and Aaxico Seminole, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-467.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 30, 1970.

Nicholson, Howard, Brawner & Lovett, Miami, for appellant.

Roman & Roman, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant brings this interlocutory appeal to review an order referring a cause for an accounting between the parties to an accountant as special master. The appellant and the appellee are partners. The pleadings reveal that they agree upon a dissolution of the partnership and that there should be an accounting between them. The only question presented is whether the court acted properly in making the reference to the accountant “to take the testimony and proofs of the parties and to report the same to this court, together with his recommendations” where appellant objected to such a reference of this cause under authority of Slatcoff v. Dezen, Fla. 1954, 74 So.2d 59. We affirm.

Rule 1.490(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., provides:

> 

> *“(b) Special Masters.*The court may appoint members of The Florida Bar as special masters in chancery for any particular service required by it, and they shall be governed by all the provisions of law and rules relating to masters in chancery except that they shall not be required to make oath or give bond unless required by the court. Upon a showing that such appointment is advisable, a *191person other than a member of the bar may be appointed as special master.”

The record reveals and the order of reference finds that the accounting is likely to be lengthy and technical in nature. Under such circumstances the reference to an accountant for the purposes set out in the order is entirely proper, since even before the foregoing rule was adopted the Supreme Court stated that a special master with authority to make findings need not be a lawyer. Powell v. Weger, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 617, 619.

Affirmed.
UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D

.C. 20460 

# pEC 102010

Mr . Larry Powell Durham Tire &Auto Center 2504 Hillsborough Rd. Durham, NC27702 

### Dear Mr . Powell : OFFICE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION ANDRECOVERY

Thankyou for your letter of November 17, 2010, to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (EPA) Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, regarding the Identification ofNon-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Waste (NHSM) proposed rule. In your letter, you express concerns that the rule may impact the current used oil management systemand could have unintended consequences. I appreciate your interest in these important issues. EPAdoes not want to reduce legitimate recycling of used oil . It is one of many non-hazardous secondary materials discussed in the proposed rule. The preamble specifically discusses the standards for management of used oil used under 40 CFRPart 279. Used oil that meets the criteria is considered "onspecification;" thatwhich does not meet the criteria, "off-specification." Under the proposed rule, onspec used oil is considered a "traditional fuel," (i .e., is considered historically managed as a valuable fuel product rather than as a waste material) . Traditional fuels are not considered solid wastes under the proposed rule. Thus, on-spec used oil would not be considered a solid waste when burned as a fuel under the proposed rule. Off-spec used oil is considered a solidwaste under the proposed rule and combustion units burning it would be subject to the appropriate standards under section 129 of the Clean Air Act for solid waste incinerators. This proposed approach would provide an additional measure of control to address the higher level of contaminants that could be present in off-spec used oil . Under the proposed rule, offspec used oil that is processed into on-spec used oil would not be considered a solid waste. The Agency will promulgate a final rule based on all available comments, information, and data. Your letter will be entered into the rulemaking docket (EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329) for consideration as the final rule is developed. Again, thank you for your letter. Ifyou have further questions, please contact George Faison of my staff at (703) 305-7652 or via email at faison george(?epa.gov. Sincerely, 

# 70 .tIvI Suzanne Rudzinski, Acting Director Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

Sustainable Use of Resources " Life Cycle Approach to Managing Chemical Risks " Safe, Environmentally Sound Waste Management Internet Address (URL) " http://www .epa.gov
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2015

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/24 9/28 10/1 10.00 18.00 18.00 83.00 -37.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 10/1 10/5 10/8 8.00 21.00 21.00 78.00 -28.00

10/8 10/12 10/15 5.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 93.00 -38.00

10/15 10/19 10/22 5.00 26.00 26.00 63.00 -6.00

10/22 10/26 10/29 5.00 26.00 26.00 58.00 -1.00

10/29 11/2 11/5 50.00 28.00 26.00 56.00 48.00

11/5 11/9 11/12 50.00 28.00 26.00 25.00 78.00 51.00

11/12 11/16 11/19 50.00 30.00 26.00 53.00 53.00

11/19 11/23 11/26 40.00 30.00 26.00 53.00 43.00

11/26 11/30 12/3 30.00 30.00 26.00 98.00 -12.00

12/3 12/7 12/10 30.00 30.00 26.00 25.00 121.00 -10.00

12/10 12/14 12/17 30.00 30.00 26.00 94.00 -8.00

12/17 12/21 12/24 30.00 30.00 26.00 84.00 2.00

12/24 12/28 12/31 30.00 27.00 26.00 48.00 35.00

1152.00 1060.00 92.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

21-DAY BILL 9/9 9/10 0.00 25.00 -25.00

Matures 10/1

25-DAY BILL 10/6 11/2 15.00 15.00 0.00

Matures 11/2

69-DAY BILL 10/29 10/30 35.00 0.00 35.00

Matures 1/7/16

72-DAY BILL 11/2 11/3 45.00 0.00 45.00

Matures 1/14/16

CMB Funds: 55.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 10/1 10/6 10/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 10/1 10/7 10/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 10/1 10//8 10/15 13.00 0.00 32.00 26.00

30-year TIPS ® 10/15 10/22 10/30 7.00 0.00 0.00 7.00

2-year note 10/30 11/4 11/5 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 10/22 10/28 11/2 15.00 0.00

5-year note 10/22 10/28 11/2 35.00 0.00

7-year note 10/22 10/29 11/2 29.00 0.00 67.72 37.28

3-year Note 11/4 11/9 11/16 24.00 0.00

10-year Note 11/4 11/10 11/16 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 11/4 11/12 11/16 16.00 0.00 60.81 3.19

10-year TIPS ® 11/12 8/20 11/30 13.00 0.00

2-year note 11/19 11/23 11/30 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN ® 11/19 11/24 11/27 13.00 0.00

5-year note 11/19 11/24 11/30 35.00 0.00

7-year note 11/19 11/25 11/30 29.00 0.00 68.38 47.62

3-year Note 12/3 12/8 12/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 12/3 12/9 12/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 12/3 12/10 12/15 13.00 0.00 32.00 26.00

5-year TIPS ® 12/10 12/17 12/31 16.00 0.00

2-year FRN® 12/17 12/23 12/24 13.00 0.00

2-year note 12/17 12/22 12/31 26.00 0.00

5-year note 12/17 12/23 12/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 12/17 12/24 12/31 29.00 0.00 68.75 50.25

527.00 329.66 197.35

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 344
Customer Account: # 9026138

P.O. Box 1888 Carson City, NV 89702

(775) 881-1201 FAX: (775) 887-2408

Victoria Lopez says:

That (s)he is a legal clerk of the TAHOE 

DAILY TRIBUNE, a newspaper published 

Wednesday, Friday, Saturday at South Lake 

Tahoe, in the State of California.

Proof and Statement of Publication

Copy Line

 Notice of Hearing 12-11-12

Legal Account

El Dorado County Air Quality Mgmt Dist

330 Fair Lane

Placerville, CA 95667

Attn: Adam Baughman 

of which a copy is hereto attached, was 

published in said newspaper for the full 

required period of 1 time(s) commencing on 

11/9/2012, and ending on 11/9/2012, all days 

inclusive.

Signed:_______________________________

Date: 11/12/2012

Ad #: 8575866D

Ad #: 8575866D

PO#: 

Price: $ 155.230

Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day 

of ______

_____________________________________

Notary Public

State of Nevada, Carson City

/05*$&0'16#-*$)&"3*/(

#FGPSFUIF#PBSEPG%JSFDUPST

PGUIF

&M%PSBEP$PVOUZ

"JS2VBMJUZ.BOBHFNFOU%JTUSJDU

/05*$&*4)&3&#:(*7&/UIBUUIF&M%PSBEP

$PVOUZ"JS2VBMJUZ.BOBHFNFOU%JTUSJDU#PBSEPG

%JSFDUPSTIBTTDIFEVMFEBQVCMJDIFBSJOHPO

5VFTEBZ
%FDFNCFS

BUUIF&M%PSBEP

$PVOUZ#PBSEPG4VQFSWJTPShT)FBSJOH3PPN


'BJS-BOF
1MBDFSWJMMF
$BMJGPSOJB
BU".PS

UIFSFBGUFS5IF#PBSEPG%JSFDUPSTXJMMDPOTJEFS

BEPQUJOHBOFHBUJWFEFDMBSBUJPOGPSUISFF	


&OWJSPONFOUBM1SPUFDUJPO"HFODZ	&1"
$POUSPM

5FDIOJRVFT(VJEFMJOFT	$5(


5IFGPMMPXJOHBDUJPOXJMMCFDPOTJEFSFEBUUIF

IFBSJOH

"EPQUB1SPQPTFE/FHBUJWF%FDMBSBUJPOGPSFBDIPG

UIFGPMMPXJOH$5(

r $POUSPMPG7PMBUJMF0SHBOJD&NJTTJPOTGSPN

&YJTUJOH4UBUJPOBSZ4PVSDFT
7PMVNF7*4VSGBDF

$PBUJOHPG.JTDFMMBOFPVT.FUBM1B SUTBOE

1 SPEVDUT$5( 	64&1"1VCMJDBUJPO/P

&1"

/5*41#

 r $POUSPMPG7PMBUJMF0SHBOJD&NJTTJPOTGSPN

4 P M W F O U  . F U B M  $ M F B O J O H  $ 5 (

	&1"

/5*41#



BOE r $POUSPMPG7PMBUJMF0SHBOJD&NJTTJPOTGSPN

&YJTUJOH4UBUJPOB SZ4PV SDFT
7PMVNF7***

(SBQIJD"SU3PUPHSBWVSFBOE'MFYPHSBQIZ$5(

	&1"

/5*41#


6 O E F SU I FG F E F S B M $ M F B O" J S" DU
4 F DU J P O

	C
	
	"

UIF%JTUSJDUJTSFRVJSFEUPJNQMFNFOU

3FBTPOBCMZ"WBJMBCMF$POUSPM5FDIOPMPHZ	3"$5


GPSFNJTTJPOTPVSDFDBUFHPSJFTDPWFSFECZB$5(

JTTVFECZUIF64&1"5IFQSPQPTFE/FHBUJWF

%FDMBSBUJPOT
TUBUJOHUIBUUIFSFBSFOPTPVSDFT

XJUIJOUIF%JTUSJDUUPXIJDIUIFTF$5(BQQMZ
XJMM

TBUJTGZUIF%JTUSJDUhT3"$5SFRVJSFNFOUT

/05*$&*4'635)&3(*7&/UIBUJGBEPQUFE
UIF

/FHBUJWF%FDMBSBUJPOTXJMMCFTVCNJUUFEUISPVHIUIF

$BMJGPSOJB"JS3FTPVSDFT#PBSE	$"3#
UPUIF

6OJUFE4UBUFT&OWJSPONFOUBM1SPUFDUJPO"HFODZGPS

J O D P S Q P S B U J P O  J O U P  U I F  $ B M J G P S O J B  4 U B U F

*NQMFNFOUBUJPO1MBO	4*1
5IJTBDUJPOXPVME

DPOTUJUVUFB4*1SFWJTJPO

/05*$&*4'635)&3(*7&/UIBUBMMJOUFSFTUFE

QFSTPOTNBZFYBNJOFUIF/FHBUJWF%FDMBSBUJPOT

BOEBTTPDJBUFEEPDVNFOUTBUUIFPGGJDFPGUIF"JS 2VBMJUZ.BOBHFNFOU%JTUSJDU
'BJS-BOF


#VJMEJOH"
1MBDFSWJMMF
$"GSPN".UP

1..POEBZUISPVHI'SJEBZCZBEWBODF

BQQPJOUNFOU1MFBTFDPOUBDU"EBN#BVHINBOBU

	
JGZPVIBWFBOZRVFTUJPOTPSUP

NBLFBOBQQPJOUNFOU

.BSJDFMMB;BNPSB

$MFSLPGUIF)FBSJOH#PBSE

1VC/PWFNCFS
"E
Exhibit 13.2


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Annual Report of Scorpio Tankers Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Date: March 31, 2015/s/ Brian LeeBrian LeeChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Jimmie Lee McGRIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 6, 1970.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and James L. DeMoully, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

Appellant Jimmie Lee McGriff appeals to this Court from a judgment of conviction *455of second degree murder after he was found guilty of that offense by a jury upon trial for first degree murder.

Only one point is urged here for reversal, which point is clearly untenable. The first witness for the State was James Peterson, father of the deceased victim. He testified he identified the body of his son at Mound Park Hospital in the presence of a Doctor Tyrone. It is contended that this was fatal error because there were other witnesses than the father who were not relatives and who could have identified the deceased.

But the testimony as to identification by the victim’s father was, in this particular case, necessary and proper, and not merely cumulative, inasmuch as there was no other eye-witness to the homicide who later viewed the body.

In the second place, and more importantly, no objections were made by defense counsel to the questions which elicited the identification testimony of the father, nor was there any motion to strike the testimony after given, nor any mistrial moved for at that time. Belatedly, after all the testimony had been concluded, both sides had rested, and the State had made its closing argument to the jury, defense counsel then made a motion for mistrial, but even then the grounds of such motion are not in the record before this Court. The circumstance of such motion being made appears only as a general recital in the minutes of the trial Court.

Such identification testimony by the father of the victim might, under certain circumstances not present here, have merited substantial consideration upon appeal if properly raised, but here there was no attempt to preserve the point. And patently, it could not be considered such a substantial departure from the concept of a fair trial as to constitute fundamental error. So we must hold that the dilatory attempt to raise the question after all the testimony was in and arguments to the jury begun was “too late and too little”.

The judgment appealed must therefore be

Affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., concurs.

McNULTY, J., concurs in conclusion only.
SCPW-20-0000583
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

GREGORIO NGIRAIWET; MAYA V. IRIONDO SIMEK; and NATHAN PLOESSER, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly-situated individuals, Petitioners,

vs. DAVID Y. IGE, Governor, State of Hawai ‘ i and ANNE E. PERREIRA-EUSTAQUIO, Director, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, State of Hawai ‘ i , Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and Wilson, JJ., Circuit Judge Castagnetti, in place of McKenna J., recused, and Circuit Judge Browning, in place of Circuit Judge Nakamoto, recused)

Upon consideration of petitioners’ petition for extraordinary writ, filed on September 28, 2020, the documents and additional declarations submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that the petition is seeking extraordinary relief regarding the processing of unemployment claims and the disbursement of unemployment benefits. Extraordinary relief is a narrow remedy confined to limited situations in which there is a clear and indisputable right to relief, and when, with respect to Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-20-0000583 29-OCT-2020 11:04 AM Dkt. 39 ODDPan agency’s duty, there is no room for discretionary action. See

Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai # i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (with respect to a public official, mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available); Salling v. Moon, 76 Hawai # i 273, 274 n.3, 874 P.2d 1098, 1099 n.3 (1994) (“A duty is ministerial where the law prescribes and defines the duty to be performed with such precision and certainty as to leave nothing to the exercise of discretion and judgment.”). Petitioners contend that respondents are not processing unemployment claims and disbursing unemployment benefits promptly to meet the demand of unemployed citizens of Hawai # i in violation of HAR § 12-5-89(c) and (e). Accepting these contentions as true, and based on the standard by which petitions for extraordinary writs are reviewed, it cannot be said that respondents have ignored or refused to undertake an obligation that is so clear beyond dispute as to warrant this court’s

2intervention in the agency’s process. In addition, it cannot be

said that petitioners lack alternative means to seek relief. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for extraordinary writ is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 29, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti /s/ R. Mark Browning

3