alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.3



LOGO

SUBSERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

SALLIE MAE, INC.

12061 Bluemont Way

Reston, VA 20190

Pursuant to Section 13.03 of the Omnibus Subservicing Agreement dated
March 23, 2009 among Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (Subservicer), Sallie Mae, Inc. as the master servicer and administrator (the Servicing Agreement), the undersigned certifies that (a) a review of the
Subservicers activities during the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision; and (b) to the best of my knowledge, based on
such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligation under the Servicing Agreement, in all material respects, during such period.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC.
|                                           
|LOGO                                       
|Jill M. Leitl                              
|Chief Servicing Officer                    
|                                           
|February 6, 2012                           



|                                                                                                                                         |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN
SERVICES, INC. 2401 INTERNATIONAL LANE | MADISON, WI 53704-3192 PHONE: 608.246.1800 | WEB: MYGREATLAKES.ORG |  |
#### The State, *Appellant,*v. Kain.

Division Two,

November 9, 1893.

Criminal, Law: false pretenses: statute: constitution., An indictment which charged that defendant obtained $400 from G-. “by means and nse of a cheat, a fraud, trick, deception and false and fraudulent representations and statements and false promises,” is insufficient, though according to the form prescribed by Keyised Statutes, 1889, section 3826, said section being unconstitutional, in that the form prescribed by it fails to notify defendant of the crime which he is required to defend. *{State v. Cameron, 117 Mo. 371.)*

*6
      *Appeal from St. Francois Circuit Court.*— Hon. James D. Fox, Judge.

Affirmed.

*JR. F. Walker,*Attorney General, for the state.

The indictment in this case is insufficient, and no error was committed by the trial court in sustaining the demurrer. The indictment is drawn under section 3826, Revised Statutes, 1889, which section has by this court been held unconstitutional, in that it fails to notify the defendant of the charge which he is required to defend, and fails to charge the manner or means by which the fraud was perpetrated and the money or property obtained. *State v. Terry,*109 Mo. 601; *State v. Benson,*110 Mo. 18; *State v. Cameron,*117 Mo. 371.

*Geo. M. Wilson*for respondent.

Burgess, J.

At the November term, 1890, of the St.. Francois circuit court, there was returned by the grand jury of said county an indictment against defendant, which, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: “The grand jury for the state of Missouri, now here in court empaneled, sworn and charged to inquire within and for the body of the county of St. Francois and state of Missouri, upon their oaths, do present and charge that one F. A. Kain, late of said county, at and in said county of St. Francois, and state aforesaid, on the--day of April, A. D. 1888, did unlawfully and feloniously obtain from Mollie Guyton $400, lawful money of the United States of the value of $400, the money and property of said Mollie Guyton, by means and use of a cheat, a fraud, trick, deception, and false and fraudulent representations and statements and false promises, contrary to the form of the statute, and against the peace and dignity of the state.”

*7The defendant filed a demurrer to the indictment, assigning the following reasons: *First,*“because said indictment and facts contained therein and stated are not sufficient in law, and do not constitute any offense under the law of this state; *second,*because said indictment fails to charge that defendant obtained from Mollie Guyton the money mentioned therein with intent to cheat and defraud.” The demuri'er was sustained and defendant discharged, to which action the state at the time excepted, and in due time perfected its appeal.

The indictment is drawn under section 3826, Eevised Statutes, 1889, which section has by this court been held unconstitutional, in that it fails to notify the defendant of the charge which he is required to defend. *State v. Cameron,*117 Mo. 371, and authorities therein cited.

Judgment affirmed.

All of this division concur.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 23- 2149 LT Case No. 2013

- CF

- 0957

_____________________________ J OSEPH L UIS L EVIN , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________ O n appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. James Daniel , Judge

. J oseph L uis Levin , Monticello , pro se . N o Appearance for Appellee. October 24, 2023
P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED . W ALLIS , E ISNAUGLE , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Respect Your Universe, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Campisi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 19, 2012

/s/David CampisiDavid Campisi,

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of China Modern Agricultural Information, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Wang Youliang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: June 11, 2012
By:
/s/ Wang YouliangWang YouliangChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Randal ALLEN et al., Appellants, v. Lawrence SUMMERS, Appellee.

No. 72-1226.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

*Feb. 7,*1973.

*14Adams, George & Wood and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellants.

Murray Z. Klein, Miami, Paul J. Culp, Boynton Beach, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

CARROLL, Judge.

The appellee Lawrence Summers filed an action in the circuit court of Dade County for damages for personal injuries received in an automobile accident alleged to have occurred in St. Lucie County. The places of residence of the defendants were not stated in the complaint.

The defendants moved the court to transfer the cause to another county. The motion and supporting affidavits showed that the accident occurred in St. Lucie County; that the two insurance company defendants were foreign corporations; that the defendant Florida Convoy, Inc. was a Florida corporation having its principal office and place of business in Orange County; that the defendant Randal Allen was a resident of Seminole County; and that defendant G. D. Mattox was a resident of Orange County.

The two foreign insurance companies, who were liability insurers of other named defendants, were made defendants in the cause under the authority of Shingleton v. Bussey, Fla.1969, 223 So.2d 713. Thus, with the accident having occurred in St. Lucie County, and the defendants other than the two insurance companies being residents of Seminole County or Orange County, the basis relied on by the plaintiff for filing the action in Dade County was because the foreign insurance companies maintained an office or agent in Dade County. The defendants’ motion to transfer was denied, and the defendants filed this interlocutory appeal from that order relating to venue, as authorized by Rule 4.2(a) FAR, 32 F.S.A.

We hold the appeal has merit. By their motion for transfer the individual defendants (under § 47.011 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) and the corporate defendant Florida Convoy, Inc. (under § 47.051 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) objecting to venue in Dade County availed themselves of the privilege to require that the action be brought or maintained in the county in which the cause of action accrued or in which they or one of them was resident. Upon so doing they were entitled to be granted relief on their motion to transfer, unless it should be made to appear that the foreign corporations joined as liability *15insurers of said defendants did not have an agent in one of the counties in which the other defendants were resident or the cause of action accrued, that is, Seminole County, Orange County or St. Lucie County. See Enfinger v. Baxley, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 538; King v. King, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 857; Commercial Carrier Corporation v. Mercer, Fla.App.1964, 226 So,2d 270; Sage v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Hartford, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 831.

The order appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Ramzan Savji, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Toron, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Toron, Inc.  Dated: June 19, 2014/s/ Ramzan SavjiRamzan SavjiPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)Toron, Inc.
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Toron, Inc. and will be retained by Toron, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 12.1
  Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,(In thousands)

2011


2010


2009


2008


2007Fixed Charges:Interest expense

$
511


$
125


$
249


$
459


$
537Capitalized interest


323















Estimate of interest within rental expense


217



184



228



194



216Fixed Charges

$
1,051


$
309


$
477


$
653


$
753Earnings:Add:Loss before income taxes

$
(40,682
)

$
(29,748
)

$
(517
)

$
(8,537
)

$
(8,969
)Fixed charges


1,051



309



477



653



753Less:Capitalized interest


(323
)














Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges

$
(39,954
)

$
(29,439
)

$
(40
)

$
(7,884
)

$
(8,216
)Ratio of earnings to fixed
    charges1


















     1

    
    Earnings for the years ended June 30, 2011, 2010, 2009,
    2008 and 2007 were inadequate to cover fixed charges and
    accordingly, no ratio to fixed charges is disclosed for those
    periods.
#### Curtis LARKIN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 17, 1972.

Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Bates v. State, 102 So.2d 826 (Fla.App.1958).

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the filing of this Amendment No.1 to the annual report of Attune RTD (the “Company”) on Form
10-K /A for the period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 10-K/A”) , as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Thomas Bianco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | The
    Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The
    information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
    of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Thomas Bianco                                                                   | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Thomas
Bianco
        Chief
Financial Officer
        (Principal
Financial Officer) | 



Dated:
December 30 , 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          20,648
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (6,838)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,976,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                (858,342)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,022,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (271,361)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                (7,022,828)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (814,087)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               203,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (104,128)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (158,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (44,130)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (114,165)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.42)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of the Census


The Census Advisory Committee on the American Indian and Alaska 
Native Populations

AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463 
as amended by Public Law 94-409, Public Law 96-523, and Public Law 97-
375), we are giving notice of a meeting of the Census Advisory 
Committee on the American Indian and Alaska Native Populations. The 
meeting will convene on December 10, 1997 at the Bureau of the Census, 
Francis Amasa Walker Conference Center, Federal Building 3, Suitland, 
Maryland 20746.
    The Committee is composed of nine members appointed by the 
Secretary of Commerce. The Committee provides an organized and 
continuing channel of communication between the communities they 
represent and the Bureau of the Census on its efforts to reduce the 
differential in the population totals from Census 2000 and on ways that 
decennial census data can be disseminated to maximize their usefulness 
to their communities and other users.
    The committee will draw on past experience with the 1990 census 
process and procedures, results of evaluations and research studies, 
and the expertise and insight of its members to provide advice and 
recommendations during the research and development, design, planning, 
and implementation phases of Census 2000.
    The agenda for the meeting on December 10, which will begin at 1:30 
p.m. and adjourn at 5:30 p.m., covers the American Indian and Alaska 
Native enumeration plan, geography issues, and staffing needs.
    The meeting is open to the public, and a brief period is set aside 
during the closing session for public comment and questions. Those 
persons with extensive questions or statements must submit them in 
writing to the Census Bureau Committee Liaison Officer, Ms. Maxine 
Anderson-Brown, Room 3039, Federal Building 3, Washington, D.C. 20233, 
at least three days before the meeting.
    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to the Census Bureau Committee Liaison Officer.
    Individuals who wish additional information regarding this meeting 
or to submit written statements may contact the Committee Liaison 
Officer on (301) 457-2308, TDD (301) 457-2540.

    Dated: November 19, 1997.
Bradford R. Huther,
Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. 97-30852 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-U
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2069 

To amend the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 to modify the 

exemptions from certain disclosure requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, and 

Mrs. BEATTY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 to 

modify the exemptions from certain disclosure requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Loan Quality 

5 Transparency Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN DISCLOSURE REQUIRE7 MENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 304 of the Home Mort9 gage Disclosure Act of 1975 (12 U.S.C. 2803) is amend10 ed— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2069 IH

1 (1) by striking subsection (i) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN DISCLOSURE RE4 QUIREMENTS.—The requirements of paragraphs (4), (5), 

5 and (6) of subsection (b) shall not apply with respect to 

6 any depository institution described in section 303(3)(A) 

7 that has total assets, as of the most recent full fiscal year 

8 of the institution, of $30,000,000 or less.’’; and 

9 (2) by striking subsection (o). 

10 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

11 Section 104 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, 

12 and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 115–174; 132 

13 Stat. 1301) is amended by striking subsection (b). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of iGambit, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Salerno, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By:
/s/ John SalernoJohn SalernoPrincipal Executive Officer


September 13, 2010
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00285

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.L. , J.L., and J.L., Children From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 00467 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 26, 2015
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION After the trial court sustained a contest to Appellant ’s affidavit of indigence, o n July 29, 2015 , we notified Appellant that the trial court clerk filed a notification of late clerk’s record stating that the clerk’s record has not been filed because (1) Appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, and (2) Appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. We ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before August 10 , 201 5 , that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s f ee. We warned Appellant that if he failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).04

- 15

- 00285

- CV

- 2

- To date, Appellant has not filed any response with this court

. Therefore, we dismiss th is appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(c). Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellant. See id. R. 43.4.

PER CURIAM