**Exhibit 34.3**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria,that Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the SEC) Regulation AB for the Company’s student loan servicingplatform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, except for 1122(d)(1)(iii)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii)-(iv), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(iii), and 1122(d)(4)(x)-(xiii), which the Company has determined are notapplicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted inaccordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backedtransactions and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities incompliance with the servicing criteria and as permitted by Regulation AB Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations of the Division of Corporation Finance, Section 200.06, “Vendors Engaged by Servicers” (C&DI 200.06). Furthermore,our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to orsubsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

Asdescribed in management’s assertion, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv), the Company has engaged a vendor to perform certain of the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that thisvendor is not considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria applicable to this vendor aspermitted by C&DI 200.06. As permitted by C&DI 200.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies 

 
1 

and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all material respects with servicing criteria applicable to the each vendor. TheCompany is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply C&DI 200.06 for the vendor and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company’seligibility to apply C&DI 200.06. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria,including servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) for which compliance is determined based on C&DI 200.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, for the Company’s student loan servicingplatform, is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

February 5, 2016 

 
2