alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7244

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA BOWER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:15-cr-00322-D-1; 5:18-cv-00246-D)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Bower, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Bower seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bower has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Bower’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2003 and for the period then ended.





|/s/ Thos. E. CappsThos. E. Capps
President and Chief Executive Officer 
August 11, 2003
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Thomas N. ChewningThomas N. Chewning
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer 
August 11, 2003
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Consolidated Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Consolidated Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2) announcement is made of the following 
special emphasis panel scheduled to meet during the month of December 
1997:

    Name: Health Care Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date and Time: December 10-11, 1997, 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Conference Room 
TBA, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Open December 10, 1997, 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
    Closed for remainder of meeting.
    Purpose: This Panel is charged with conducting the initial 
review of grant applications for research and demonstration projects 
on the use of measurements in improving the quality of health care. 
Applications are sought in three areas: (1) methods and measures to 
allow translation of scientific information about medical care into 
quality measures and strategies to improve clinical practice; (2) 
studies of the relationship between organizational change and 
quality measurement and improvement in health care; and (3) studies 
of the use of information derived from measurement about quality of 
care by consumers, patients, employers, providers, and insurers to 
make decisions.
    Agenda: The open session of the meeting on December 10 from 8:00 
a.m. to 8:30 a.m. will be devoted to a business meeting covering 
administrative matters and reports. During the closed sessions, the 
Panel will be reviewing and discussing grant applications dealing 
with health services research issues. In accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 
U.S.C., 552b(c)(6), the Administrator, Agency for Health Care Policy 
and Research, has made a formal determination that these latter 
sessions will be closed because the discussions are likely to reveal 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications. This information is exempt from mandatory disclosure.
    Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, minutes of the 
meeting, or other relevant information should contact Sheila S. 
Simmons, Committee Management Officer, Agency for Health Care Policy 
and Research, Suite 400, Executive Office Center, 2101 East 
Jefferson Street, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone (301) 594-
1452 ext. 1627.
    Agenda items for all meetings are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
John M. Eisenberg,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-31589 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
#### Miguel F. MOYA, Appellant, v. Evelio CASAS, Appellee.

No. 2544.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 24, 1969.

David K. Tharp, of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Miami, for appellant.

James M. Adams, of Sholts, Adams & Born, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
NO. 07-01-0448 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L D MAY 22, 2002

______________________________ LUREANER OULARE,

Appellant
v. STATE OF TEX

AS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE COUNT Y COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF POT TER COUNT Y COUNTY;

NO. 95,498-1; HON. W .F. CORKY ROBERTS, PRES IDING

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, J.J. Appellant Lureaner Oulare appeals her conviction of resisting arrest, search or transportation. He r so le is sue is identical to that raised in Lureaner Oulare v. State, No. 07-01-040 4-CR, pending in this court. W e overrule it for the sam e reasons stated in our opinion issued t his day in L ureaner Oulare v. State, No. 07-01-040 4-CR. That is, appellant waived the issue. Accordingly, the j udgme nt of the trial court is affirmed.

Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish.
| (1)   | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               |   |                                               |   |
|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 10, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Gene Maher                                |   |
|               |   | Gene Maher                                         |   |
|               |   | Principal Accounting OfficerNortheast Island Corp. |   |
|               |   |                                               |   |
Exhibit 13.2



CFO Certification Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of JinkoSolar
Holding Co., Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), Longgen Zhang, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/Longgen Zhang        | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|Name:  | Longgen Zhang           | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date:  | April 18, 2012          |
255 La. 908

#### BOSSIER MILLWORK & SUPPLY COMPANY v. Samuel J. TOUCHSTONE et al.

No. 50467.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1970.

In re: Bossier Millwork & Supply Company applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 232 So.2d 117.

Writ refused. The result is correct.

FOURNET, C. J., and BARHAM, J., are of the opinion the writ should be granted. The appellate court has failed to accord appellate review as required by law.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 209 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 209

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, as the ``Lance 
           Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL MARC LUCAS TUCKER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 209

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, as the ``Lance 
           Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building''.
```
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 209 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 209 EH

1 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL MARC LUCAS TUCKER POST 

2 OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 305 Highway 15 North in 

5 Pontotoc, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Lance Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Marc 

12 Lucas Tucker Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 209 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMarc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building’’. Pontotoc, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal al Service located at 305 Highway 15 North in
:

Kea

Ne’

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.c.

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

March 5, 2019

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Madam Speaker:

1 am writing to notify you, as required under 5 U.S.C. § 8438(h)(2), of my determination that, by
reason of the statutory debt limit, I will be unable to invest fully the Government Securities
Investment Fund (G Fund) of the Thrift Savings Fund, part of the Federal Employees’
Retirement System, in interest-bearing securities of the United States, beginning on March 5,
2019. The statute governing G Fund investments expressly authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury to suspend investment of the G Fund to avoid breaching the statutory debt limit. My
predecessors have taken this suspension action during previous debt limit impasses. By law, the
G Fund will be made whole once the debt limit is increased or suspended. Federal retirees and
employees will be unaffected by this action.

I respectfully urge Congress to protect the full faith and credit of the United States by acting to
increase the statutory debt limit as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Sho Med

Steven T. Mnuchin

Identical letter sent to:
The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader
The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Democratic Leader
The Honorable Kevin McCarthy, House Republican Leader

ce: The Honorable Richard E. Neal, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Kevin Brady, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Charles E. Grassley, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance
The Honorable Ron Wyden, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
255 La. 287

#### James H. GARY and Carmen Gary v. Hubert M. BLANCHARD and Utica Mutual Insurance Company.

No. 50329.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 6, 1970.

In re: James H. Gary and Carmen Gary applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 228 So.2d 515.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
ccc 

C'oc 

Coc 

~~~~a(iUb 

::/1\IX:. 't ~ V<=. <:J,flg c,J.,. c (C..fo 

,S (Cly · ? c,9/~-rVjfv!S--c; {. CQorn 

k, CJc/~3 C5~v ~of\. t"'c( v' 
51 

SJ, 

_1.._ / ' ' _,1 / -/ 1 ' . 

'
**EXHIBIT 31.4**

** Certification **

I, Terry R. Horn, certifythat:

1.           I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Texas-New Mexico Power Company;

2.           Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.            The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter (each registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

----

5.           The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  November 3, 2005 

/s/ Terry R. HornTerry R. Horn,Vice President, CorporateSecretary and acting Chief FinancialOfficerTexas-New Mexico PowerCompany
#### Melita Anne THORNTON, a minor by her father and next friend, George J. Thornton, and George J. Thornton, individually, Appellants, v. Timothy Wallis ELLIOTT, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Mary O. Elliott, and Mary O. Elliott, individually, Appellees.

No. 71-931.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 16, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1972.

William E. Blyler of Patterson, Ma-loney & Shankweiler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Dieter K. Gunther, of Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Falnes v. Kaplan, Fla. 1958, 101 So.2d 377, 379.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
#### Margaret M. WILSON, Appellant, v. Henry A. WILSON, Appellee.

No. 75-2096.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 30, 1976.

On Rehearing Aug. 27, 1976.

*1030Robert S. Levy, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Edna L. Caruso, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto & Dean, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that the order of October 24, 1975 increasing the amount of temporary alimony and providing attorney’s fees and costs should be vacated and set aside. The nature and conduct of the proceedings below were such as to prevent a full and complete consideration of all evidence relevant to the issues under consideration. Moreover, the application for temporary alimony, including temporary attorney’s fees, was not accompanied by the financial statement required by Rule 1.611, Fla.R.Civ.P., nor supported by competent substantial evidence. *Provus v. Provus,*44 So.2d 656 (Fla.1950); *Baruch v. Giblin,*122 Fla. 59, 164 So. 831 (1936). Additionally, the award of attorney’s fees for substituted counsel was not made in accordance with the procedure prescribed in *Chaachou v. Chaachou,*122 So.2d 24 (Fla.3d DCA 1960). Accordingly, the order of October 24, 1975 is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

MAGER, C. J., and WALDEN and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing and/or clarification this court’s opinion of July 30, 1976 is modified only to the extent of deleting the following sentence:

> “. . . Additionally, the award of attorney’s fees for substituted counsel was not made in accordance with the procedure prescribed in Chaachou v. Chaachou, 122 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).”

Notwithstanding the deletion of the foregoing this court reaffirms its original opinion vacating and setting aside the order of October 24, 1975 in its entirety.

MAGER, C. J., and WALDEN and DOW-NEY, JJ. concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ulyses SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 61679.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Ulyses Smith, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Jefferson.

Since the transcription of the prior plea and conviction is unavailable, an evidentia-ry hearing is ordered to determine its validity.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of zulily, inc. ("zulily") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2014 (the "Report"), Darrell Cavens, President and Chief Executive Officer of zulily, and Marc Stolzman, Chief Financial Officer of zulily, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:





1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of zulily.














Date:  February 28, 2014/s/ Darrell CavensDarrell CavensPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)





Date:  February 28, 2014/s/ Marc StolzmanMarc StolzmanChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of zulily under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.