alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.3

Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. and SubsidiariesRATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

|                                                                     |  | For the Three
Months Ended
March 31, 2004 |        | For the Twelve
Months Ended
December 31, 2003
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------
|
|EARNINGS                                                             |  |                                           |        |                                              
|Net Income                                                           |  | $                                         | 15,407 |                                              
|Federal Income & State Tax                                           |  |                                           | 10,150 |                                              
|                                                                    
|Total Earnings Before Federal and State Income Tax                   |  |                                           | 25,557 |                                              
|FIXED CHARGES*                                                       |  |                                           | 5,275  |                                              
|                                                                    
|Total Earnings Before Federal and State Income Tax and Fixed Charges |  | $                                         | 30,832 |                                              
|                                                                    
|* FIXED CHARGES                                                      |  |                                           |        |                                              
|Interest on Long-Term Debt                                           |  | $                                         | 4,419  |                                              
|Amortization of Debt Discount, Premium and Expense                   |  |                                           | 209    |                                              
|Interest Component of Rentals                                        |  |                                           | 450    |                                              
|Other Interest                                                       |  |                                           | 197    |                                              
|                                                                    
|Total Fixed Charges                                                  |  | $                                         | 5,275  |                                              
|                                                                    
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                   |  |                                           | 5.8    |                                              
|                                                                    

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2475

ROSA K. LOCKHART, Widow of Donald Lockhart,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;

ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(96-1451-BLA)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosa K. Lockhart, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Christian

P. Barber, Helen Hart Cox, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Washington, D.C.; Ronald Gurka, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Arlington, Virginia; Martin Ellison Hall, Natalie D. Brown, JACKSON

& KELLY, Lexington, Kentucky, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1998). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Lockhart v.

DOWCP, BRB No. 96-1451-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 27, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 209 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 209

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, as the ``Lance 
           Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL MARC LUCAS TUCKER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 305 Highway 15 North in Pontotoc, Mississippi, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Marc Lucas Tucker Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit
34.5
 (KPMG LOGO)
    
    KPMG LLPSuite 1501222 South 15th StreetOmaha, NE 68102-1610Suite 1600233 South 13th StreetLincoln, NE 68508-2041
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




---



##### 








---



##### 



(NELNET LOGO)
    
    3015 SOUTH      PARKER ROAD
    
    p 303.696.3699
    
    www.nelnet.netSUITE 400
    
    
    
    NELNET,      INC.AURORA,   CO  60014 - 2906
 Managements Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria
      March 15, 2011
    
    /s/ Terry J. HeimesTerry J. Heimes, Chief Financial OfficerNelnet Inc./s/ Robert W. BeiersdorfRobert W. Beiersdorf, PresidentNelnet Servicing, LLC




---



##### 



Appendix A
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Autism--related program projects.
    Date: December 8-9, 1997.
    Time: December 8:00 p.m.--10:00 p.m., December 9-8:30 a.m.--
adjournment.
    Place: Strathallan Hotel, Rochester, New York.
    Contact Person: Norman Chang, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NICHD, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5E01, 
Rockville, MD 20852, Telephone: 301-496-1485.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review research grant 
applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meeting due to urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research and No. 93-865, Research for Mothers and 
Children], National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-31229 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### CHARLOTTE COUNTY, Appellant, v. VENTURE OUT IN AMERICA, INC., Appellee.

No. 70-302.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 20, 1971.

R. Earl Warren, Englewood, for appellant.

James M. Nixon, II, of Dye, Dye, Smith, Cleary & Scott, Bradenton, and Wotitzky, Wotitzky & Cheves, Punta Gorda, for ap-pellee.

McNULTY, Judge.

Charlotte County brings this interlocutory appeal from an order of the circuit court denying its motion to dismiss a declaratory judgment action praying for in-junctive relief brought by appellee. We reverse.

Appellee claims an interest in certain property in Charlotte County which, allegedly, it proposed to develop into a trailer park. In reliance upon prior zoning actions of appellant, appellee made substantial preliminary expenditures. It now alleges that appellant, by certain resolutions, has indicated an intention to rezone the subject property, *in- futuro,*adversely to appellee’s interests and to the detriment of its aforesaid proposed development. Sounding in estoppel, the complaint seeks to enjoin appellant from rezoning the property in question.

Appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint raised numerous grounds, all of which are also urged in this appeal. We need only discuss one point, however, since it is dispositive of this case in its present posture; that is, that this action is prematurely brought.

It is well settled that the exercise of zoning authority is a legislative function 1*250involving much discretion. The holding of public hearings designed to inform the legislative body which way to exercise its discretion is an integral part of the legislative process and should not be interfered with by the courts. The property in question has not yet been rezoned and the exact manner of the threatened rezoning is not yet apparent even if it be assumed that it is inevitable. If and when the rezoning takes place appellee may challenge the decision by appropriate means, and may even seek injunctive relief against enforcement thereof if appellee feels it (or its application as to appellee) is invalid. Until that time the suit is premature.2

Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and MANN, J., concur.

1

. See, cases cited in 35 Fla. Jur. Zoning Laws, §, 17.

2

. “Mere allegations that a board of county commissioners is threatening to pass resolutions or edicts which, if passed, will be unlawful or ineffective, constitute no ground for injunctive interference with the preliminary internal functioning of the county board. The resolving powers of the board are to be tested by the resolutions or actions that they actually pass. These, if invalid or beyond the county board’s powers, can be tested in appropriate proceedings, wherein it may become necessary for the court to deter-ine their enforceability as against any legal rights set up in conflict therewith.” Hernandez v. Board of Commissioners of Hillsborough County, 114 Fla. 219, 153 So. 790, 791 (Fla.1934). .See, also, 43 C.J.S. Injunctions § 110.
#### Zdenka SLOMOVIC, Appellant, v. VES CARPENTER CONTRACTORS, INC., a Florida corporation, Walter Meisner and Lillian Meisner, Appellees.

No. 73-1184.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 29, 1974.

Stanley L. Seligman, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Eric H. Golden, Hunter & Atkinson, P. A., Hollywood, for appellees.

DOWNEY, Judge.

This interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Count I of the amended complaint and striking certain portions of the prayer of Count II of the amended complaint, is reversed on authority of Zimmerman v. Diedrich, Fla. 1957, 97 So.2d 120; Koplon v. Smith, Fla. 1973, 271 So.2d 762; Dolan v. Wright, 289 So.2d 777, 4th DCA, Opinion filed February 15, 1974.

It would have been most helpful in this case had appellees filed a brief as required by rule 3.7(b), F.A.R., 32 F.S.A. Once again, attention is drawn to an appellee’s responsibility thereunder to support the ruling of the trial court (or concede error) and assist the appellate court through the medium of a responsive brief. Holden v. City of Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.App. 1973, 286 So.2d 218.

Reversed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
# ERA Summary

# ERA1 State & Local Reporting
Transaction Summary

The U.S. Department of the Treasury agreed to make a loan of up to $7.5 billion to American 

Airlines, Inc. (the Company). Treasury originally agreed to make a loan of up to $5.477 billion to 

the Company, and on October 21, 2020, Treasury increased the maximum loan amount to $7.5 

billion. The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of American Airlines Group, Inc. and one of 

the largest domestic airlines in the United States. The Company had approximately 157,000 U.S. 

employees in March 2020 and carried more than 150 million passengers in 2019. 

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(1) the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is secured by the Company’s AAdvantage loyalty 

program. The loan has an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% and matures on June 30, 2025. 

The Company elected to draw $550 million at loan close and may draw the remaining loan funds 

in multiple draws through May 28, 2021. The loan proceeds will be used to provide liquidity to 

continue the Company’s operations. The transaction agreement includes covenants by the 

Company to comply with certain restrictions on employee compensation, stock repurchases, 

dividends, and reductions in employment levels, as required by the CARES Act. Treasury will 

receive warrants to purchase common stock equal to 10% of the total loan amount drawn.
#### Ernest TOWNSEND, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1103.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>







                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Statements of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 ($ in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Twelve Months                                 Twelve Months
                                                      Ended March 31,                              Ended December 31,
                                                 -----------------------       -----------------------------------------------------
                                                        2003       2002              2002       2001      2000      1999       1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------       -----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>        <C>               <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>
CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES:                        809.4      487.9             727.6      491.2     465.6     556.1      461.1

ADJUSTMENTS:
    Interest during construction                        (3.1)      (2.3)             (3.0)      (2.2)     (2.2)     (2.8)      (2.1)
    Distributed (Undistributed) equity income              -       (0.6)             (2.5)        2.2     (5.5)     (5.8)      (0.4)
    Fixed charges *                                    123.9      167.1             149.5      183.4     194.7     183.8      163.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------       -----------------------------------------------------
Earnings available                                     930.2      652.1             871.6      674.6     652.6     731.3      621.9

*FIXED CHARGES:
    Interest on long-term and short-term debt          115.1      158.5             121.7      175.5     174.0     167.8      146.8
    Portion of rentals representing interest             8.8        8.6              27.8        7.9      20.7      16.0       16.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------       -----------------------------------------------------
Total Fixed Charges                                    123.9      167.1             149.5      183.4     194.7     183.8      163.3

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                      7.51       3.90              5.83       3.68      3.35      3.98       3.81
========================================================================       =====================================================
</TABLE>


Prior periods have been restated to reflect discontinued operations.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MG98-2-000]


Midwestern Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Filing

November 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 6, 1997, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern) filed updated standards of conduct under Standard 
I, 18 CFR 161.3(i), and to reflect changes resulting from the corporate 
merger with El Paso Natural Gas Company and sale of Kern River Gas 
Transmission Company.
    Midwestern states that it served a copy of the filing on all of its 
customers and affected state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214. All such motions to 
intervene or protest should be filed on or before November 25, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30070 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Norman C. DAVIS and Debbie G. Davis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendanfs-Appellees.

No. 4384.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1973.

Mitchel M. Evans, DeRidder, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Hall, Raggio & Farrar by Richard B. Cappel, Lake Charles, for defendants-ap-pellees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and PONDER, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Hopson v. Allstate Insurance Company, 286 So.2d 99, in which a separate judgment is rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs-appellants.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 34.2
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
  
    
    Servicing criterion 1122(d)(1)(iii) is applicable only with respect to the Companys
continuing obligation to act as, or locate a, successor servicer under the circumstances
referred to in certain transaction agreements. It is managements interpretation that the
Company has no other active back-up servicing responsibilities in regards to 1122(d)(1)(iii)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Furthermore, Managements Assertion of
Compliance indicates that there were no activities performed related to this criterion during
the year ended December 31, 2010 with respect to the Platform, because there were no
occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities.
    
    Servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(iii) is applicable to the activities the Company performs
with respect to the Platform only as it relates to the Companys obligation to report
additions, removals or substitutions on reports to investors in accordance with the
transactions agreements.
  




---



#####
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5965-5966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-3-002]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

February 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 30, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing to become effective April 1, 1997.
    Texas Eastern asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's Order on Compliance Filings issued November 15, 
1996 in Docket No. RP97-3-000 (November 15 Order).
    Texas Eastern states that these actual tariff sheets reflect the 
modifications required in the November 15 Order to incorporate the 
requirements of Order No. 587 that interstate pipelines follow

[[Page 5966]]

standardized procedures for critical business practices--nominations, 
flowing gas (allocations, balancing and measurement), invoicing and 
capacity release.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were served on firm 
customers of Texas Eastern, interested state commissions, current 
interruptible customers and all parties on the service list.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before February 20, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3149 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M