alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 
**OLRILD c.**  **MANN** ?hrch 29, 1939

. ..- .=*aHonorableR. E. Beasleg CountyAuditor, Collin County Fdcl(inney,

Texas **Deer sir:** Honorable R. $. Beasley, ?&arch29, 1939, Page 2

A review of the statutes controlling thesematters, setting them forth in their chronol.ogloal order, shows that the 44th Legislature in 1935 enaoted Article 2746b, same being a general statuteapplylng to school districts,both oommon and Independent. The act in question repealed by implicationboth Artioles 2776 and 2746 In so far as they conflictedwith it. Said aot beoams efieotive 3kroh 22, 1935, and from that date until the amendment of Artiole 2746 by the 45th Legislature,effeotive April 29, 1937, all expense inourred in connectionwith or incidental to any schooldlstriot eleotionwas payable out of the availablemaintenance Suad belonging to suchdistrict.

Arttole 3746, both bef’ore and 

### after axmdaant, **par tainsdoalytoMwwa**  8OhOO1di8tWiOt8, and~rodd8datkr **w ill**  **1937**that the bleOtic0 jUdg88 (b OOlrnOIL 8OhOO1 di8triOt8) 8hall **be** paid Out or the &YXLera& fund Of th0 oouaty in whleh **8ald** slmotionwae hsld and it **re** the& extent the portion of Artlolls 27Mb.in oo lot with

hid oalod 00 it in **W** far a8 O-11 8OhOO1 di8tridt8 8X0 OOZiO8r~~. 9-U-8 W&F lffpr? ATTo& OERERAL OF TEXAE

EpS:AAQ’! 

# w A88i8tcUlt -k
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31853]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-610-000]


Northern States Power Company (Minnesota Company); Notice of 
Filing

December 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 10, 1997, Northern States Power 
Company (Minnesota) (NSP), tendered for filing a Non-Firm Point-to-
Point Transmission Service Agreement and a Short-Term Firm Transmission 
Service Agreement between NSP and Continental Energy Services, L.L.C.
    NSP requests that the Commission accept both the agreements 
effective October 15, 1997, and requests waiver of the Commission's 
notice requirements in order for the agreements to be accepted for 
filing on the date requested.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before December 10, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31853 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Flory Skerret, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Floridalma Skerret, et al., Plaintiffs, v Khanna Nixon, Respondent, and Andrew Forwand, Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 378]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Andrew Forwand appeals from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated May 14, 2001, which, in effect, denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the amended order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

Flory Skerret (hereinafter Skerret) allegedly was injured when she was struck by a vehicle driven by Nixon Khanna sued herein as Khanna Nixon, as she attempted to cross Utopia Parkway in Queens. In an unsuccessful attempt to avoid striking Skerret, Khanna simultaneously applied his brakes and swerved to his left. The appellant Andrew Forwand was also operating his vehicle on Utopia Parkway and traveling in the same direction as Khanna, but in the lane directly to Khanna’s left. Khanna’s evasive swerve to the left put his vehicle directly into the lane of traffic occupied by Forwand. Moments after Khanna struck Skerret, the right front portion of Forwand’s vehicle came into contact with the left rear quarterpanel of Khanna’s vehicle. Skerret commenced the action against both Khanna and Forwand, and Forwand subsequently moved for summary judgment, contending inter alia, that he neither caused nor contributed to Skerret’s injuries. Only Khanna opposed the motion.

*501Forwand made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320). In opposition to the motion, Khanna’s conclusory and speculative assertions concerning Forwand’s possible negligence were unsupported by any competent evidence and were thus insufficient to defeat the motion *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Child v Suffolk County Water Auth.,*283 AD2d 537; *Pryor v Reichert,*265 AD2d 470). Accordingly, Forwand is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him. Altman, J.P., Smith, Adams and Prudenti, JJ., concur.
Transaction Summary

Treasury agreed to make a loan totaling $1,162,124 to American Jet International Corp. (the 

Company), an air carrier with approximately 44 U.S. employees in March 2020.

Treasury made the loan pursuant to section 4003(b)(1) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security (CARES) Act. The loan is secured by accounts receivable. It has an annual 

interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% and matures on November 5, 2025. The Company may 

draw the loan proceeds in a single draw through November 19, 2020. The loan proceeds will be 

used to provide liquidity to continue the Company’s operations. The transaction agreement 

includes covenants by the Company to comply with certain restrictions on employee 

compensation, stock repurchases, dividends, and reductions in employment levels, as required by 

the CARES Act. The loan constitutes senior indebtedness of the Company, and Treasury will 

receive 3% payment-in-kind annual interest on the loan in accordance with section 4003(d) of the 

CARES Act.
254 La. 758

#### Melvin H. MELANCON v. ZOAR MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH et al.

No. 49936.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Melvin H. Melancon applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 222 So.2d 308.

Application denied. On the facts as found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
#### Jimmy CONEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-668

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 31, 1970.

Jack J. Taffer, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J„ and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of rape and sentenced to 20 years in prison. His conviction was affirmed by this court. See Coney v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 193 So.2d 57. This appeal is from a denial in the trial court of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Rule 1.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A.

Appellant urges that he should be granted a new trial because of the holding of the United States Supreme Court subsequent to his trial in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). Upon this contention the trial court held:

> “As to the first ground relied upon by defendant, it appears to the Court that this question has been decided adversely to the defendant by the District Court of Appeal in Coney vs. State, 193 So.2d 57. Defendant argues that the ruling of the District Court of Appeal has been nullified by the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Bruton vs. United States, 391 U.S. 123, [88 S.Ct. 1620] 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), which was the latest word on the subject at the time defendant filed his motion herein. However, the Bruton case has been qualified by the very recent United States Supreme Court decision, that of Harrington *539vs. California, 5 CrL 3059 United States Supreme Court rendered on June 2, 1969. [395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284] It appears to the Court that excluding the minor oral statement objected to by defendant, the evidence of guilt is overwhelming, and that even if such oral statement were erroneously admitted into evidence, such was harmless error.”

Our review of the record convinces us that the trial judge was correct in his application of the law to the facts as revealed by the record.

Affirmed.
No. 00-913.

#### Kersey *v.*Crane et al.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4680-000]


Starghill Alternative Energy Corporation; Notice of Issuance of 
Order

December 2, 1997.
    Starghill Alternative Energy Corporation (Starghill) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Starghill will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. Starghill also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Starghill requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 
CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability by Starghill.
    On November 24, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Rate Applications, Office of Electric Power 
Regulation, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Starghill should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Starghill is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interest will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Starghill's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is December 24, 1997.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31897 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.10 


 


CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT BOTH (I) IS NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY
HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. SUCH EXCLUDED INFORMATION HAS BEEN MARKED WITH “[***]. 


 


AMENDMENT 1 TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This
AMENDMENT 1 TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT ("Amendment 1") is entered into on this 5th day of September, 2018 ("Amendment
1 Effective Date") by and between Journey Medical Corporation, a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business
at 9237 Via De Ventura Suite 135, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 (the "Buyer") and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, a Michigan
corporation, located at [***] (the "Seller"). Buyer and Seller are referred to herein individually
as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties".


 


WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller entered into
an Asset Purchase Agreement dated 31st August, 2018 (the "Agreement").


 


WHEREAS, the Parties wish
to amend and supplement certain of the terms and conditions of the Agreement under this Amendment 1 as recorded herein.


 


WHEREAS, this Amendment 1
forms part of and is to be read with the Agreement as from the Amendment 1 Effective Date.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1 AMENDMENTS


 


The Parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1.1Section 6.7 of the Agreement shall be deleted
and replaced by the following:


 


"Prescription
Drug User Fee Act. Following the Effective Date, Buyer shall assume and have responsibility for fees or charges associated with the
Product due and payable to the FDA after the Effective Date pursuant to the Prescription Drug User Fee, and any reauthorization thereto
("PDUFA Fees"). Seller shall retain full responsibility and liability for the PDUFA Fees due and payable on or prior
to the Effective Date. In the event the Seller makes payment of any PDUFA Fees after the Effective Date, the Buyer shall reimburse the
PDUFA Fees to the Seller within thirty (30) Business Days from the date of receipt of invoice raised by the Seller."


 


2 GENERAL


 


2.1As of the Amendment 1 Effective Date, this
Amendment 1 shall be read together with and shall be deemed to be incorporated in the Agreement and shall be governed by the terms,
conditions and definitions set forth in the Agreement, as if such terms were fully set forth herein.


 


2.2Except as expressly
amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed and
ratified.


 


2.3If there is inconsistency between the provisions
of the Agreement and this Amendment 1, the provisions of the Amendment 1 shall prevail.





 






    Page 1 of 2


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
hereto have executed this Amendment 1 as on the date first mentioned above.


 


	 	Journey
    Medical Corporation
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
                  
	 	Name:
	 	Title:
	 	 
	 	Sun
    Pharmaceutical Industries
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ 
	 	Name:
	 	Title:




 








    Page 2 of 2
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00259

- CR
George Andrew Day v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 17

- 2176

- 0

- CR

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this c ause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 30, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30802]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


North American Wetlands Conservation Council; Meeting 
Announcement

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North American Wetlands Conservation Council (Council) 
will meet on December 10 to review proposals for funding submitted 
pursuant to the North American Wetlands Conservation Act. Upon 
completion of the Council's review, proposals will be submitted to the 
Migratory Bird Conservation Commission for funding approval. The 
meeting is open to the public.

DATES: December 10, 1997, 9:00 A.M.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Tensas River National 
Wildlife Refuge, Route 2, Box 295, Tallulah, Louisiana, (318) 574-2664. 
The North American Wetlands Conservation Council Coordinator is located 
at the Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington Square Building, 4401 N. 
Fairfax Drive, Room 110, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coordinator, North American Wetlands 
Conservation Council, (703) 358-1784.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the North American 
Wetlands Conservation Act (Pub. L. 101-233, 103 Stat. 1968, December 
13, 1989, as amended), the North American Wetlands Conservation Council 
is a Federal-State-private body which meets to consider wetland 
acquisition, restoration, enhancement and management projects for 
recommendation to and final approval by the Migratory Bird Conservation 
Commission. Proposals from State, Federal, and private sponsors require 
a minimum of 50 percent non-Federal matching funds.

    Dated: November 14, 1997.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 97-30802 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-U
#### Katherine C. JONES v. Ronald D. MURRAY and Allstate Insurance Company.

No. 8402.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 30, 1971.

Lannis A. Kircus and Kenneth Scullin, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

David Robinson, of Watson, Blanche, Wilson, Posner & Thibaut, Horace C. Lane & Anthony Clesi, Joseph F. Keogh, Baton Rouge, for appellees.

Before LOTTINGER, SARTAIN and TUCKER, JJ.

LOTTINGER, Judge.

This suit was originally consolidated for purposes of trial below as well as in this Court on appeal with Suit entitled Jones v. Murray and Allstate Insurance Company, 250 So.2d 481. We treated both cases in our opinion this day rendered in Suit No. 8401 and for the reasons therein assigned, the judgment of the Lower Court will be affirmed, all costs of this appeal to be paid by petitioner.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29923]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2627]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Subcommittee on Safety of Life 
at Sea and Associated Bodies Working Group on Stability and Load Lines 
and on Fishing Vessels Safety; Meeting Notice

    The Working Group on Stability and Load Lines and on Fishing 
Vessels Safety of the Subcommittee on Safety of Life at Sea will 
conduct an open meeting at 9 a.m. on Thursday, December 4, 1997, in 
Room 1103, at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20593-0001. This meeting will discuss the upcoming 41st 
Session of the Subcommittee on Stability and Load Lines and on Fishing 
Vessels Safety (SLF) and associated bodies of the International 
Maritime Organization (IMO) which will be held on January 26-30, 1998, 
at the IMO Headquarters in London, England.
    Items of discussion will include the following:
    a. Harmonization of damage stability provisions in the IMO;
    b. Progress of the Intercessional Correspondence Group on Load 
Lines issues;
    c. Technical revisions to the Code on Intact Stability;
    d. High Speed Craft Code revision;
    e. Role of the human element, including shipboard loading and 
stability software; and
    f. Safety aspects of ships engaged in a ballast water exchange.
    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room.
    Interested persons may seek information by writing: Mr. Paul 
Cojeen, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Commandant (G-MSE-2), Room 1308, 
2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling (202) 
267-2988.

    Dated: November 5, 1997.
Russel A. La Mantia,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-29923 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
Exhibit
10.8


PROMISSORY
NOTE (“NOTE”) - 10% SIMPLE INTEREST





 


	$30,000.00	September 30, 2021





 


 


For
VALUE RECEIVED, SYBLEU INC. (“Borrower”) promises to pay to Bostonia Partners, Inc. (“Lender”) the principal
sum of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00] with accrued simple interest at the rate of 10% percent per annum on the balance. The said
principal and accrued interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America on September 30, 2022. This Note may
be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. The Borrower hereby waives any notice of the transfer of this
Note by the Lender or by any subsequent holder of this Note, agrees to remain bound by the terms of this Note subsequent to any transfer,
and agrees that the terms of this Note may be fully enforced by any subsequent holder of this Note. All terms and conditions of this
Note shall be interpreted under the laws of the state of California and venue shall be the state of California.


 



SYBLEU
INC.


 


By:
/s/ David Koos


Its:
Chairman and CEO


 


Accepted
By:


 


Bostonia
Partners, Inc.


 


By:/s/
Timothy Foat


Its:
President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             853
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,700
<INVENTORY>                                     13,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,037
<PP&E>                                         714,581
<DEPRECIATION>                               (294,386)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 590,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,054
<BONDS>                                         94,773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,237
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   590,509
<SALES>                                        300,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,898
<CGS>                                          257,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  257,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,455
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,658
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>