alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LAW O FFICES 

GAROFALO GOERLICH HAINBACH PC 

1200 NEW HA ~lPSHIRE AVENUE NW ·SUITE 590 ·WASHINGTON DC 20036-6802 

TELEPHONE 202 776-3970 · FACSIMILE 202 776-3975 

BY EMAIL 

Robert Finamore, Chief 

Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

W'WW .GG H -A I RLA W .COM 

August 6, 2014 

Re: Application of Blue Jet Sp. z o.o. for Foreign Air Carrier Permit and 

Exemption Authority; Docket DOT -OST -2014-0026 

Dear Mr. Finamore, 

In response to JetBlue's letter of July 18, 2014, we confirm that Blue Jet and JetBlue 

have reached a settlement in principle in the trademark litigation and are working together on 

memorializing a written agreement for the parties to sign. However, Blue Jet fully expects there 

will be a period of time during which the parties will be permitted to implement the terms of the 

settlement. As such, there are no grounds for delaying the Department's decision in this 

proceeding, and we respectfully request that the Department act on Blue Jet's application in the 

referenced docket. 

Counsel for Blue Jet Sp. z o. o. 

cc: Toby Butterfield, Esq., Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC (via email) 

Beth Goldman, Esq., Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC (via email) 

Jonathan B. Hill, Esq., Cooley LLP (via email) 

J. Parker Erkmann, Esq., Cooley LLP (via email) 

Benjamin M. Berlin, Esq., Cooley, LLP (via email) 

Docket DOT-OST-2014-0026
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000524 30-OCT-2018 08:52 AM
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31346]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Voluntary Foreign Aid Advisory Committee; Notice of a Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby 
given of a meeting of the newly appointed Advisory Committee on 
Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA).

    Date: December 18, 1997 (8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.).
    Location: State Department, Loy Henderson Auditorium, 23rd 
Street Entrance.
    This will be the first public meeting of the newly appointed 
Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA). Different 
panels of experts will help the committee determine their workplan 
and to select focus issues for this new term.
    The meeting is free and open to the public. HOWEVER, 
NOTIFICATION BY DECEMBER 15, 1997, THROUGH THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE 
HEADQUARTERS IS REQUIRED. Persons wishing to attend the meeting must 
FAX their name, organization, birthdate and social security number 
for security purposes to Lisa J. Douglas (703) 741-0567 or Susan 
Saragi (202) 216-3039.

    Dated: November 18, 1997.
Elise Storck,
Executive Director, Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid 
(ACVFA).
[FR Doc. 97-31346 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000077821-MAR-201310:11 AM
EXHIBIT 12



CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)



_____________________________________________________________________________
Twelve Months to March 31                                              1999
_____________________________________________________________________________
Earnings:
  Income from continuing operations.........................         $288,665
  Add income taxes..........................................          135,815
                                                                     ________
    Income from continuing operations 
    before income taxes.....................................          424,480
  Distributed income from unconsolidated investees,
    less equity in earnings thereof.........................           (1,658)
                                                                     ________
    Subtotal................................................          422,822
                                                                     ________

  Add fixed charges:
    Interest on long-term debt, including amortization
      of debt discount and expense less premium.............          104,470
    Other interest expense..................................           21,428
    Portion of rentals deemed to be representative
      of the interest factor................................            9,685
                                                                     ________
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES.........................................          135,583
                                                                     ________
TOTAL EARNINGS..............................................         $558,405
                                                                     ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES..........................             4.12
                                                                     ========
_____________________________________________________________________________
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30375]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 4, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Jeffery Hirsch, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Leo A. and Louis A. Altier, both of Corning, Ohio; William H. 
Altier, Zanesville, Ohio; John F. Altier, Crooksville, Ohio; Paul W. 
Altier, Corning, Ohio; Christina M. Altier, Columbus, Ohio; Mary Ann 
Flowers, Lancaster, Ohio; Pamela R. Compston, New Lexington, Ohio; 
Donald M. Altier, Somerset, Ohio; and Angela L. Hopkins, Cedar Hill, 
Texas; to retain voting shares of The Bank of Corning Company, Corning, 
Ohio.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Jack C. Vanderburg, Scot A. Renick, and Philip B. Davis, all of 
Dalhart, Texas, acting in concert; to retain voting shares of First 
Dalhart Bancshares, Inc., Dalhart, Texas, and thereby indirectly retain 
First National Bank in Dalhart, Dalhart, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 14, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-30375 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
OFFER PAID LEAVE

FIGHT COVID-19

Find out more about the Biden-Harris 

Administration’s recovery programs at 

TREASURY.GOV/CORONAVIRUS

Please note that this is a simplified description of the paid leave credit rules. Business owners should consult with 

their tax advisors regarding the specifics of their situation.

THE

D

EPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

1789

Your business may also be 

eligible for additional 

credits for employees who 

took sick leave April 1, 2020

through March 31, 2021.

Get paid back for offering paid leave

Thanks to the American Rescue Plan, immediate tax credits are available through most of 2021 to 

businesses that offer their employees paid sick and family leave. You could see these credits in 

your bottom line as soon as your next quarterly filing.

These credits make it easy to keep your employees safe and healthy. And, they are good for more 

than just your business: Offering paid sick and family leave helps fight the virus by helping 

employees get vaccinated and encouraging sick employees to stay home.

If you:

• Are a business with under 500 employees;

• Offer paid sick or family leave to your employees through September 30, 2021; and

• Have employees who take paid leave due to COVID-19 including for illness, 

quarantine, isolating, getting tested or vaccinated, or caregiving.

Your business may be eligible for tax credits of more than $17,000 per employee who takes sick 

or family leave from April 1 through September 30, 2021. 

Businesses can file 

quarterly for this 

credit through 

September 30, 2021. 

Businesses can receive tax 

credits for paid leave their 

employees take to receive 

or recover from the 

COVID-19 vaccine.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN STEVENSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 96 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of July, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7136
RONALD CHARLES WAGENER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA PRISON SYSTEM, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-96-729-3) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Charles Wagener, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wagener v. Director, Virginia Prison System , No. CA-96-729-3 (E.D. Va. July 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc. (the
Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of
the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2011



/S/    CHARLES J. SCHREIBER,
JR.Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2044 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2044

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 17 East Main Street in Herington, Kansas, as the ``Captain Emil J. 
                     Kapaun Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2021

   Mr. Mann (for himself, Mr. Estes, Mr. LaTurner, and Ms. Davids of 
   Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 17 East Main Street in Herington, Kansas, as the ``Captain Emil J. 
                     Kapaun Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN EMIL J. KAPAUN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 17 East Main Street in Herington, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Captain Emil J. Kapaun Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Emil J. Kapaun Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL M. MARTINEZ,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MAX WILLIAMS; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-35115

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00580-ST

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Former Oregon state prisoner Michael M. Martinez appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

constitutional violations in connection with a prison guard’s shooting of Martinez

during a prison yard riot. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

FILED

JUL 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-35115

review de novo, Day v. Apoliona, 616 F.3d 918, 924 (9th Cir. 2010), and we may

affirm on any ground supported by the record, Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055,

1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment as to Williams and

Nooth because Martinez failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to

whether either was “personally involved in the deprivation of his civil rights.” 

Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). 

To the extent that Martinez alleges that Williams and Nooth are liable based

on their promulgation or implementation of an unconstitutional use-of-force

policy, summary judgment was proper because Martinez has failed to raise a

genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the Oregon Department of

Corrections’ policy is “so deficient that the policy itself is a repudiation of

constitutional rights and is the moving force of the constitutional violation.” 

Redman v. County of San Diego, 942 F.2d 1435, 1446 (9th Cir. 1991) (en banc)

(citations and internal quotation marks omitted); Jeffers v. Gomez, 267 F.3d 895,

915 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding a similar policy to be constitutional).

The district court also properly granted Fletcher qualified immunity because

a “reasonable official standing where [Fletcher] was standing” could believe that

shooting an inmate to “stop an assault that could have seriously injured or killed
3 11-35115

another inmate was a good faith effort to restore order, and thus lawful.” Marquez

v. Gutierrez, 322 F.3d 689, 693 (9th Cir. 2003).

Martinez’s remaining contentions, including those concerning the alleged

deficiencies of his court-appointed counsel, are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
#### W. K. CONTRACTING COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAUER DREDGING CO., Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3165.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 13, 1970.

*433John H. Sherrill, III, Alexandria, and William Henry Sanders, Jena, for plaintiff-appellant.

Shotwell, Brown & Sperry, by George M. Wear, Monroe, Vinson, Elkins, Searls & Connally, by James W. McCartney, Houston, Tex., Jones, Kimball, Harper, Tete & Wetherill, by G. Allen Kimball, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The defendants-appellees filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal on the basis that an appeal bond was not timely filed by the plaintiff-appellant.

The record reflects that judgment for defendant was rendered on December 12, 1969. The clerk’s certificate shows that on that same date the clerk mailed a copy of the judgment to the two attorneys for plaintiff of record. The plaintiff did not file an application for a new trial, and the delay for doing so expired on December 17, 1969. The plaintiff secured an order of devolutive appeal on March 5, 1970, but the appeal bond in the form of a $250.00 check of a private individual was not posted until April 23, 1970.

By the express terms of Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2087, an appeal bond must be filed within ninety days of the expiration of the delay for applying for a new trial.

 The jurisprudence is quite clear that a failure to timely file security for a devolutive appeal divests the appellate court of jurisdiction, and effectively deprives the litigant of his right to appeal. Numerous cases interpreting Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2087 make it quite clear that the appeal in the instant case must be dismissed if the record is accurate and complete. See Hulsey v. Houston Contracting Co., 225 So.2d 155 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1969); Schouest v. Loewenthal, 58 So.2d 425 (La.App.Orl.1952); Fisher v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 218 La. 243, *48*So.2d 911 (1951).

The plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to remand the trial record for correction, alleging that it does not reflect that a motion was made and an order issued naming Thomas H. Fowler as attorney for plaintiff on October 31, 1969. This contention seems unusual, in that a supplemental petition filed by plaintiff on November 20, 1969, was signed by John M. Sherrill, III, and William Henry Sanders, the attorneys who have represented the plaintiff from the initiation of the suit to the present time. Mr. Fowler apparently has not participated in the suit at any stage of the litigation. Therefore, the requirement that a copy of the judgment be mailed to plaintiff’s counsel was complied with when copies were mailed to Mr. Sherrill and Mr. Sanders. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.


|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|/s/ | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Cheryl W. Grisé        
|    | Chief Executive Officer




|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ | David R. McHale                                  
|    | David R. McHale                                  
|    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 4, 2006  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SERVED FEBRURY 11, 2011 n ARWHT OF 

• - vkoHRTMiON 

•:?q'0PERAT10NS 

2011 r£B M P 2^ '-^0 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EMPIRE AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP09NM0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0586 

SECOND AMENDED POST HEARING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

The Amended Post Hearing Briefing Schedule is hereby further amended as 

follows: 

1. Empire Airlines, Inc. shall file its Post-Hearing Brief on or before 

February 18, 2011; and 

2. The Federal Aviation Administration shall file its Rebuttal Brief, if 

any, on or before March 7, 2011. 

Attachment - Service List 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP06NM0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention. Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Mark J. Conlin, Esq. 

Conlin, Maloney & Miller 

Attorneys at Law 

421 W. Riverside Ave., Suite 911 

Spokane, WA 99201 

TEL: (509)624-3020 

FAX: (509)623-1650 

Karen Davis Huber, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration | 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 fi 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. ^s 

Renton, WA 98057-3356 ;j 

TEL: (425)227-2163 U 

FAX: (425)227-1007 ^ 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge U 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

v. S. Department of Transportation % 

400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 5411 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor (202) 366-2139; Legal Assistant 6-5121 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.