alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the use inRegistration Statement No. 333-170321 on Form S-1 and to the incorporation by reference to Registration Statement No. 333-167673 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 24, 2011, relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedules of Graham Packaging Company Inc. and the effectiveness of Graham Packaging Company Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in Supplement No.3 to the Prospectus Dated December 30, 2010, which is part ofRegistration Statement No. 333-170321, and in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Graham Packaging Company Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

February 24, 2011
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00809

- CV

Andrew GOSS

, Appellant

v.

Shakia GOSS

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 02273

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellee Shakia Goss recover her costs on appeal from Appella nt Andrew Goss.

SIGNED January 10, 2018.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ William Salek       |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                    |   |   |
| Name:  | William Salek           |   |   |
|   |                    |   |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|   |                    |   |   |
|   | Date: May 13, 2009      |   |   |

----
#### JEFFERSON NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI BEACH, a national banking association, Appellant, v. THREE WAY CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-586.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 3, 1970.

Courshon & Courshon and Robert L. Weintraub, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Kaplan & Shapiro, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The basic question presented upon this appeal concerns the legal effect upon the title to real property of a recorded “Agreement Not to Encumber”. The real property was mortgaged after the agreement was recorded. The appellant bank to whom the agreement was given was made a party to a foreclosure instituted by the appellee corporation. The bank appeals a final judgment which held that the bank did not have a prior lien on the land.

The appellant has presented four points, all of which argue that the agreement is in actuality an equitable mortgage. Unfortunately this question is not presented *434by the record. Appellant was made a defendant but failed to offer evidence at the final hearing. Without proof of more than a breach of the contract not to encumber by the person who was also the mortgagor, there can be no prejudicial error in the foreclosure of the mortgage. Therefore we must decline to pursue the question further.

Affirmed.
<Page>
                                                                    Exhibit 12.3


                  ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                           RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   Twelve Months Ended
                                 (Thousands of Dollars)


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                         SEPTEMBER          DECEMBER
                                                           2001               2000
                                                         ---------          --------
<S>                                                       <C>               <C>
EARNINGS
  Net Income                                              $40,453            $39,069
  Federal Income & State Tax                               31,173             22,826

  Total Earnings Before Federal and State Income Tax       71,625             61,895

FIXED CHARGES*                                             26,578             28,399
                                                          -------            -------
      Total Earnings Before Federal and State
        Income Tax and Fixed Charges                      $98,204            $90,294
                                                          =======            =======


  * Fixed Charges

  Interest on Long-Term Debt                               22,130            $22,933
  Interest Component on lease Payment                       1,260              2,515
  Other Interest                                            3,189              2,951
                                                          -------            -------

      Total Fixed Charges                                 $26,578            $28,399
                                                          =======            =======



  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                         3.70               3.18
                                                          =======            =======
</Table>
Exhibit 31.2

I, Thomas N. Chewning, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Natural Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 5(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
        Date: November 3, 2004
 
 
     /s/ Thomas N. Chewning
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Commercial Corp., certify
that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial
Corp.
(the "Registrant");

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the Registrant.  We have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 13, 2005

                                             /s/ Bernard Korn
                                             ---------------------
                                             Bernard Korn
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             Chairman of the Board and President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-5-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Filing

November 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 19, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised 
tariff sheets to become effective November 19, 1997:

    Tenth Revised Sheet No. 825
    Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 826
    Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 827
    Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 828
    Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 829
    Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 830
    Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 831
    Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 832
    Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 833

    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being 
filed simply to update its Master Receipt/Delivery Point List.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31183 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES:

                                -----------------

                            DWS Large Cap Value Fund


The following information replaces similar information about the portfolio
management team in the "Portfolio management" section of the fund's
prospectuses:

The following people handle the day-to-day management of the fund:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                       <C>
Thomas Schuessler, PhD                                            Volker Dosch
Managing Director of Deutsche Asset Management and                Managing Director of Deutsche Asset Management and Portfolio
Lead Portfolio Manager of the fund.                               Manager of the fund.
 o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 2001 after 5 years at       o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 1989 and the fund
   Deutsche Bank where he managed various products and worked        in 2009.
   in the office of the Chairman of the Management Board.          o Fund Manager of US and global equity funds; Head of US
 o US and Global Fund Management: Frankfurt.                         Equities; Deputy Head of Fund Management International
 o Joined the fund in 2007.                                          Equities; Head of Sector-Funds: Frankfurt.
 o PhD, University of Heidelberg, studies in physics and           o Master's degree in Economics ("Diplom-Volkswirt") from
   economics at University of Heidelberg and University of           the University of Frankfurt, Germany.
   Utah.

Oliver Pfeil, PhD
Vice President of Deutsche Asset Management and Portfolio
Manager of the fund.
 o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 2006 after 3 years as
   Executive Assistant to the Management Board of Deutsche
   Bank. Previously, Research Fellow at the Swiss Institute of
   Banking and Finance at the University of St. Gallen
   (2000-2002); Visiting Scholar in Capital Markets Research
   at MIT Sloan School of Management (2002-2003). Also, serves
   as part-time Lecturer in Finance at the University of St.
   Gallen in Switzerland.
 o Joined the fund in 2009.
 o Portfolio manager for US and global value equity: Frankfurt.
 o PhD in finance and accounting and Master's degree in
   Business Administration from the University of St. Gallen;
   CEMS Master in International Management from the University
   of St. Gallen & ESADE, Barcelona; completed bank training
   program ("Bankkaufmann") at Sal. Oppenheim jr. & Cie. KGaA,
   Cologne.
</TABLE>








               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference



                                                          [DWS INVESTMENTS LOGO]
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group

October 2, 2009
DVF1-3606
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Active Health Foods, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory Manos,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








April
      14, 2010
            By:
            /s/ GREGORY
      MANOSGregory
      ManosPresident,
      CEO and Director
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 5790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-36, RM-8991]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mendota, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Mendota Broadcasting Company requesting the 
allotment of Channel 263A to Mendota, California, an incorporated 
community, as its first local aural transmission service. Coordinates 
used for Channel 263A at Mendota are 36-45-12 and 120-22-54.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 24, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 8, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Henry E. Crawford, 
Esq., Law Offices of Henry E. Crawford, 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW., 
Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-36, adopted January 
24, 1997, and released January 31, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-3119 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
DWS VARIABLE SERIES II

               SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES:

                                 -----------------

                               DWS Technology VIP


The following information supplements the "Portfolio Manager" section of the
above-noted portfolio's prospectuses:

Clark Chang
Director of Deutsche Asset Management and Portfolio Manager
of the portfolio.
 o Global Equity analyst for Technology Fund: New York .
 o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 2007 after seven years
   of experience as senior analyst for technology sector for Firsthand Capital
   Management, Nollenberger Capital Partners and Fulcrum Global Partners.
 o Joined the portfolio in 2008.
 o BS in Computer Science from University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA);
   MBA with Finance concentration from Anderson School of Management, UCLA.












               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference



November 21, 2008
VS-3615
                                                                     [Logo]DWS
                                                                   INVESTMENTS
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group
#### Betty PENABAD and Walter F. Geiger, Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-649.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 12, 1974.

Fuller, Brumer, Moss, Cohen & Rodgers and Burt E. Redlus, Miami, for appellants.

Kuvin, Khngensmith & Coon and R. Fred Lewis, Coconut Grove, for appellee.

Before CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reliance Mutual Life Insurance Company of Illinois v. Booher, Fla.App. 1964, 166 So.2d 222.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2307

THOMAS OJONG,

 Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals

Submitted: July 26, 2011 Decided: August 11, 2011

Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danielle Beach-Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, 

PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant 

Attorney General, Anh-Thu P. Mai-Windle, Senior Litigation 

Counsel, James A. Hurley, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Ojong, a native and citizen of Cameroon, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely and 

numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record 

and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on 

Ojong’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We 

accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated 

by the Board. See In re: Ojong, (B.I.A. Oct. 26, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED