alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
  U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
              SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned, Garrett Sullivan, the Treasurer
Cognitronics Corporation (the "Company"), has
executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2006  (the "Report").  The undersigned hereby certifies that:

	(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of
	Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
	of 1934; and
	(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly
	presents, in all material respects, the financial
	condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATED this 14th day of November, 2006


                                                /s/ Garrett Sullivan
                                                Garrett Sullivan
                                              Treasurer (Chief Financial
                                                      Officer)

                                           A signed original of this
                                           written statement required by
                                           Section 906 has been provided
                                           to the Company and will be
                                           retained by the Company and
                                           furnished to the Securities and
                                           Exchange Commission or its
                                           staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2638]


Bureau of Diplomatic Security; 60-Day Notice of Proposed 
Information Collection; Request for Building Pass Identification Card 
(DS-1838)

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Existing collection in use without an OMB control 
number.
    Originating Office: Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS).
    Title of Information Collection: Request for Building Pass 
Identification Card.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: DS-1838.
    Respondents: USG employees, Contractors, Vendors, Press, Caterers, 
Family Members, Retired employees, and others as needed.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10,250.
    Average Hours Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 2,550 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Eliza McClenaghan,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30726 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-M
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement No. 333-172234 on Form S-8 of our report dated May 13, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule of Daqo New Energy Corp., appearing in this Annual Report on Form20-F of Daqo New Energy Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. 

 

Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China 

 

May 13, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      12,200,306
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  254,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,483,302
<PP&E>                                       2,616,711
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,667,021)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,676,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          489,482
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,318
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,175,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,676,450
<SALES>                                      1,066,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               958,304
<CGS>                                           20,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,413,569
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,152,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,152,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,152,127)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62346-62347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Kaloko Honokohau National Historical Park Advisory Commission; 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act that a meeting of the Na Hoa Pili O Kaloko Honokohau, Kaloko 
Honokohau National Historical Park Advisory Commission will be held at 
9:00 a.m., December 13, 1997, the Coffee Mill Room, Keauhou Beach Hotel 
in Kona, Hawaii.
    On Saturday, December 13, the Commission will begin its first 
meeting with a formal swearing in ceremony. The business meeting will 
begin immediately following and last until 3 p.m.
    The Advisory Commission was established by Pub. L. 95-625 and has 
been re-established by Title I, Section 503, of Pub. L. 104-333 to 
advise the park superintendent with respect to the historical, 
archeological, cultural, and interpretive programs of the park.
    Members of the Commission are as follows:

David Roy, chairperson
Henry Auwae
Abbie Napeahi
George Naope
Hannah Kihalani Springer
Francis Kuailani
Bryan Harry
Angel Pilago
Stephen Kane-A-I Morse
Mervyn Thompson
Pualani Kanahele
Fred Cachola
Duane Hanakeawe

    The regulations involving nude bathing and the use of the fish 
ponds and traps will be the principal discussion topics at the Saturday 
meeting.
    This meeting is open to the public. It will be recorded for 
documentation and transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the meeting 
will be available to the public after approval of the full Advisory 
Commission. A transcript will be available after December 30, 1997. For 
copies of the minutes, contact the Park Superintendent at 808-329-6881.


[[Page 62347]]


    Dated: November 7, 1997.
Patricia L. Neubacher,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West.
[FR Doc. 97-30650 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31098]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated July 21, 1997, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 26, 1997 (62 FR 45271), Bridgeway Trading 
Corporation, 7401 Metro Blvd., Suite 480, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration to 
be registered as an importer of marihuana (7360), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule I.
    The firm plans to import marihuana seed which will be rendered non-
viable and used as bird feed.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Bridgeway Trading Corporation to 
import marihuana is consistent with the public interest and with United 
States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. Therefore, pursuant 
to Section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act 
and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 
1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: November 14, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-31098 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### Lynwood Earl GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-46.

District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District.

Feb. 9, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 26, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40151 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NEKIA PUGH, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CR-256-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Nekia Pugh was convicted by a jury on one count of possession with intent to distribute and distribution of five grams or more of crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to 87 months’ imprisonment followed by five years’ supervised release. Pugh now appeals the district court’s judgment. In the sole issue he raises on appeal, Pugh argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by (1) elicitingNo. 03-40151 -2- testimony from him about plea discussions that otherwise would not have been admissible and which opened the door to testimony that he previously had purchased cocaine and (2) failing to object to and to request a curative instruction to remove the taint of testimony that he may have threatened the life of a key witness. Pugh did not raise his ineffective assistance claims in the district court. As a general rule, we decline to review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, although we may do so in exceptional cases where the record is adequate to allow review of the claims’ merits. See United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987); see also Massaro v. United
States , ___ U.S. ___, 123 S. Ct. 1690, 1694 (2003) (stating that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is preferred method for raising claim of ineffective assistance of counsel). This is not the exceptional case. Accordingly, we decline to review Pugh’s ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     3,052
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,052
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,716
<OTHER-SE>                                         336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of China Real Estate Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chen Yu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Chen Yu
Chen Yu
Principal Executive Officer
March 31, 2010
# Housing Transactions Report

# MHA Incentive PMTs

# Hardest Hit Funds

# FHA Short Refi
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH DANNY PROPHET,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et

al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-15804

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-02822-FCDEFB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Joseph Danny Prophet, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

FILED

JUN 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-15804

prison personnel violated his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Prophet’s second amended complaint

because he failed to state a cognizable claim against any defendant. See Lewis v.

Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 354-55 (1996) (a prisoner’s right to access the courts is

limited to the pursuit of a non-frivolous claim concerning his conviction or

conditions of confinement); Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 847 (1994) (“[A]

prison official may be held liable under the Eighth Amendment for denying

humane conditions of confinement only if he knows that inmates face a substantial

risk of serious harm and disregards that risk by failing to take reasonable measures

to abate it.”); Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816-17 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam)

(a prisoner’s allegations of property deprivations failed to state a due process claim

under section 1983 because California provides an adequate post-deprivation

remedy). 

Prophet’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
Order entered December 21 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00833
- CV
IN RE PATRICIA STEPHENS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE WALTER H. STEPHENS TRUST, T H E SSH TRUST, THE SUTTON ELIZABETH STEPHENS TRUST, THE HEATHER LOVE STEPHENS IRREVOCABLE TRUST, AND PATCO ENERGY, LTD., Relators
O rigina l Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 03406

O RDE R Before Justices Osborne, Reichek, and Browning Before the Court is relator s ’ September 17, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus in which they challenge the tr i a l court ’ s order denying their motion to transfer venue

. The Court requests that real part ies in interes t and resp ondent file a response, if any, to the petition for writ of mandamus by January 8 , 202 1

.
/s/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Sharp Performance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert J. Sharp, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: July 15, 2013  SHARP PERFORMANCE, INC.  By:/s/ Robert J. Sharp Robert J. Sharp Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Harvey Beker, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Millburn Multi-Markets Fund L.P.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:





a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  March 30, 2011


/s/ Harvey BekerHarvey BekerCo-Chief Executive OfficerMillburn Ridgefield CorporationGeneral Partner, Millburn Multi-Markets Fund L.P.
#### Arnold Lee YOUNG v. Mrs. Tommye Ann YOUNG.

No. 46082.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1971.

Young, Young & Scanlon, O. Murray McNeely, Jackson, for appellant.

Barnett, Montgomery, McClintock & Cunningham, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.