alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C i r c u i t C o u r t f o r B a l t i m o r e C i t y

C a s e N o . 2 4

- C

- 0 6

- 0 0 9 9 1 1 A r g u e d : 3 / 7 / 1 4 R e a r g u e d 5 / 6 / 1 4 I N THE COURT OF APPEAL S OF MARYL

AND

No. 105

September Te rm, 2013

BEN C. CL YB URN, et al.

v. QUI NTON RI CHMOND, et a l.

Ba rber a, C.J

. Har rell Ba ttag lia Gre ene Adkins McDona ld Watts, J J

.

ORDER

Filed: May

28, 2014BEN C. CL YB URN, et al. * I n the * Court of Appea ls v. * of Mar y land

* No. 105 QUI NTON RI CHMOND, et a l. * September Te rm, 2013


### O R D E R

The Court having issued a temporar y stay in the above entitled case until 4:30 p.m. on Marc h 11, 2014, and there afte r extended the temporar y stay to 4:30 p.m. on J une 5, 2014; and, considering that the Court, on May 2 7 , 2 0 1 4, adopted the Rules Commi ttee’s proposal in its 183 Report (as rd amende d), which contained Rules amendments desig ned to implement the re quirements of the Court’s opinion in DeWolfe v. Richmond, 434 Md. 444 (2013), i t i s t h i s 2 8 day of May 2014 t h ORDERED, by the Court of Appea ls of Mary land, that the temporar y stay of the injunction issued in this matter by the C ircuit Court for Baltimore Ci ty on J an u ar y 1 0 , 2 0 14 (as amended by Orde r of J anuar

y 13, 2014) be, and the same is here by , extende d fr o m 4:30 p.m. on J une 5, 2014, to 7:59 a.m. on J uly

1, 2014; and it is further ORDERED that the afor esaid stay and injunction shall be vaca ted as of 8:00 a.m. on J uly 1, 2014, without further or der of the Court.

/s/ Mary Ellen Ba rber a Chief J udg e
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"), I, William J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: December 30, 2003 |  | /s/ WILLIAM J. MURPHY
William J. Murphy
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18E0040. DANIELLE ROLLINS v. GLEN ROLLINS.

Chris A. Corbett, counsel for Danielle Rollins, has filed a request for an

extension of time to file a discretionary application until April 30, 2018. Said request

is hereby GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

March 30, 2018

03/30/2018
#### Ernest ELLISON, Auditor General of the State of Florida, Petitioner, v. Abbott M. HERRING, Individually and as State Attorney for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, Respondent.

No. 44382.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
Silberstein Ungar, PLLCCPAs and Business Advisors


Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com








March 23, 2011





To the Board of Directors of


MyOtherCountryClub.com


Reno, Nevada





To Whom It May Concern:








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by MyOtherCountryClub.com of our report dated March 21, 2011, relating to the financial statements of MyOtherCountryClub.com, a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the periods ending December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from inception to December 31, 2010.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
oi- (4-ooM-£R 4 ppetfate. Gause M?. Court of Crti/iifty} nP/700'^ Austin /£ 7£70(- 4445" AUi g*TO Dear Clerk: EacJoscJ p)ao3e -Pindtnv/ Pre 5© Defendants A/latian-*-<>< e^rf-Atncft 

### TTj** to R(e Petition£>r tW^nare/ fe^, fl^ £|e ^ rY(<rciGn arid bnncj ft -b attention op -the CWt. 

### "P/ease dats-stamp-this (dfcer flwd n?fcaro rfc "fe me rft /w«j qcilrx^s shown, beW COURTOFCRIMIWAUppeA!j c?n cvr)u1 r • ivN^fj- j-«» AUG 27 2015 

### Abe/Acosta, clerk Sincerely

1401 siate- S^S0' ra'.«.. I\ID (57- 14-00/WCJ? |HTt4£ Courr0F ^Ri^1 ^u Appeal fta5nM;T^cA5

REX EA^ z

FW*w IWI to. fll-ffr-ooiH-Cfr -Trwl case No. . :W5^3ft,bi(,
Comes n<w Rex/W.~Sfrt<gr, Petoner;aod-G(est>\is A}otor\ -Por e^ctooaon d-f sc^((^*)ckius mw/hich-to^Ue #Teb±±br\c£ ftseinsfcK'nany K«vieo,Xt\ support of-thisTAotion, appellant shews -the &urt-the-followingJ X. 

### "The. ?^tt6aer unc cow©feed in -the. I 31 ttts-tnefc CturtoP liibofik Qsuntjj, TS-xft6 af-(Jke OCfeneeof D^i Si^lorMore, m -tfe Cause. Wo 2.013- 436, Uk, S^A Stateo-PTexos V5. ^^i6e£. "The ^etrboner tfpps&led 4o-the- 

### (^ocjrfec£ Arppexfe T^ Sap^e^e OlttaiQI P/s-trct ."The G#se atis a^inrwoJ On Mar«K3L20l6".

# TL. t, H\ "Thepn-asyjt de«di<ne€>r-G(,m ^eT^ton^T)|aif^^r3 i^w B unlfrouyi 

### "Jfte: Bftttoner has mob flajues^ianj edefihor\ prior-to-bhis nspest 

## m. Pe-trtioioers ffeauest-for an attend &base upon-lh^-Gllo^nci "6^ : ~fetboner iufc not inCbroried <5-P thecfeusion erf-bht&wrt <s-f Appeals m effirmw hisdase cint T"^, 2-015" Sincethsct-bme Vehiboner has been attemptino-to tfflln i<e<^l

representation*) tft/s matter". His attorna* d* the tfppml |4Ui 

### fas w>4W»ed[PebW -fctoL he u^.lj not^p^sentVm 0^

rertiaontor Usdftetionafy ftcuieuj. 

### SjOha^Ftee, T^titioner pftfys the Courtqrants-the moiioo an<J e\rb£fld -thedaadline4r-filim4rl)^rett6oam l^su;?*; fee Ma. 2413-43%-Mk "to

gdt3 6T-14-0OIH-6R

C\cRBF\(Lm"ioN of S^fojid^r 

## JT&r&f t^ta4r«^awdComscLcopytrffcheabove and ^Wu/g "KrstAMw to US. Mad^ postageprepaid;^rs^cJflSSj-to the. /tfiWj -ftr^jfe, ^ j^ at T>0, 'Bw )05"3U, UifctoakTTetfis TM08, anJ -to 5W^%^mtm koto* 

## Pi>>B* ^°5,Austin;iexp5 7BTI * -bh.5 )Z c^o-f Au^a5t; 20/5 X u?06 in-formed#•£ rm deeiSlOA £>n mu Appeal (^ ^L ^ 2016^ ba 

### T^WSde fecial MOi l! ^ ^^)' a r~~J ies\ pnPse.U." .. i

in 

## 11^^ W1 tfc

'•>• i I H %
#### Louis Butler O’NEAL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44484.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 283 So.2d 166.

ROBERTS, Acting, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 13.2  Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of IFM Investments Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin Cheng Wei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 25, 2013   By:
/s/ KEVIN CHENG WEIName:
Kevin Cheng WeiTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
#### Ruth SAVAGE, Appellant, v. Catherine Pinner BELL et al., Appellees.

No. R-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 1973.

Theodore J. Troxel, of Levin, Warfield, Graff, Mabie & Rosenbloum, Pensacola, for appellant.

William Fisher, Jr., of Fisher, Hertz & Bell, and Robert P. Gaines, of Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co., 260 So.2d 235 (1 Fla.App. 1972); and General Telephone Co. of Florida, Inc. v. Mahr, 153 So.2d 13 (2 Fla.App.1963).

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 26, 2012

h0919 

# Order

September 26, 2012

144368

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144368

COA: 303624

Wayne CC: 04

- 009306

- FC

DEVON E. SMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals i s considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

M ARILYN K ELLY

, J., would grant leave to appeal.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41059 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN HENRY TOPSY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-91-CR-303-1

- - - - - - - - - - May 12, 1999 Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Henry Topsy (#55462-079), has applied for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) for an appeal from the dismissal of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and of his application for a writ of audita querela. Topsy does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that his § 2255 motion is time-barred. Even if it is assumed that the writ of audita querela survives as a vehicle for challenging criminal convictions, it is not available to Topsy because the issue he wishes to raise does not involve a legal defense which arose after the judgment. SeeUnited States v. Banda , 1 F.3d 354, 356 (5th Cir. 1993). The

request for a COA is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Horace JOHNSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53809.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Horace Johnson applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The application is premature. In the event, the Correctional authorities fail to properly execute the sentences, applicant has an adequate remedy at that time.

DIXON, J.,

concurs in the denial. Ha-beas corpus is not the proper remedy at this time. The proper determination of applicant’s correct sentence can be made in other proceedings, such as mandamus or declaratory action.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Federal Maritime Commission.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 62 FR 55810.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 5:00 a.m.--October 
23, 1997.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Correction in the time and date of the meeting--
Should be October 23, 1997--5:00 p.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joseph C. Polking, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29358 Filed 11-3-97; 11:29 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31121]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Scientific Computing; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Scientific Computing 
(#1185).
    Date and Time: December 15-16, 1997, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, 1881 Curtis Street, Denver, CO 
80202.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    For Further Information Contact: Dr. John Van Rosendale, Program 
Director, New Technologies Program, Suite 1122, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-
1962.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide recommendations and advice 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: Panel review of the New Technologies Program proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and person 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-31121 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
| Name of Subsidiary                                    |   | Place of Incorporation |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| China Dahua Group International Holding Property Ltd. |   | British Virgin Islands |
| Haoyu Group Limited                                   |   | Hong Kong              |
| Chongqing Difa Investment Management Limited Company  |   | PRC                    |
| Chongqing Zhongbao Investment Group, Ltd.             |   | PRC                    |
| Chongqing Weitai Real Estate Management Company       |   | PRC                    |
| Chongqing Zhaoli Real Estate Consulting Company       |   | PRC                    |
| Shaanxi Zhongbao Real Estate Development Company      |   | PRC                    |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report
of Graham Packaging Company Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David W. Bullock, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Company Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 5, 2010



By:

/S/    DAVID W.
BULLOCKDavid W. Bullock Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of China Du Kang Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Wang YongshengWang YongShengChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)November 4, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of ZST Digital Networks, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
## TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

ASHRAE Equipment

Dec ember 2014

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
#### Allison F. ST. GERMAIN, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION and Gray Security Services, Inc., Respondents.

No. 70-1114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OH N E UG E NE B R OWN, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 50468 D . C. N o . 2 : 1 2 - c r - 0 0 6 1 1 - J FW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn F . W a l t e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J ohn E uge ne B r ow n appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntand c h a lle n g e s h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n an d1 5 0 - m o n th s e n te n c e f o rp o s s e s s io n w ith i nt e ntt o di s tr i but e c oc a i ne ba s e i n the f orm of c r a c k c oc a i ne , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . § 841( a ) ( 1) , ( b) ( 1) ( B ) . P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 

# FI LED OC T 03 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 50468 2 ( 1967) , B r ow n’ s c ouns e l ha s f i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng tha tthe r e ar e no gr ounds f or re l i ef , al on g w i th a m ot i on t o w i thd raw as coun se l of re cord. W e have provi ded B row n the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent al b r ie f o ran s w e r in g b r ie f

h a s b e e n f

ile d . B row n w ai ved h i s r i gh tt o app ea l hi s c on vi ct i on , w i th the except i on of an appe a l ba s e d on ac l a i m tha thi s pl e aw a s i nvol unt ary . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 488 U . S . 75, 80 ( 1988) , di s c l os e s no ar gu abl e groun ds for r el i ef as t o the vo l un t ar i ness of B row n’ s pl ea . W e there fore a f f irm a s to th at is s u e . W e d is m is s th e r e m a in d e ro f B r o w n ’s ap p e a l o f

h is c o n v ic tio n in lig h t o f

th e v a lidap p e a l w a iv e r . Se e U ni te d States v . W

at s on , 582 F . 3d 97 4, 98 8 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). B e c au s e we f

i n dn o ar g u ab l e g r o u n d s f o rr e l i e f a s t o B r o wn ’ s s e n t e n c e , we af fi rm hi s s ent ence . C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED . A F F IR M E D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2015

jam 

# Order

Clerk January 22, 2015

1 50811 ( 32 )

VICTOR LEON WILSON

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 50811

COA: 323092

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be

liable for filing fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall p ay to the

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $ 4 .00, shall submit a copy of this order

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until t he payments equal the balance due of

$3 71 .00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
#### Robert John ERLER, Petitioner, v. Hon. Robert W. TYSON, Jr., Judge of Court of Record for Broward County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-586.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 16, 1970.

Steadman S. Stahl, Jr., and Joseph A. Varón, of Varón & Stahl, Hollywood, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus and return thereto demonstrate the petitioner is not entitled to the relief prayed for. Accordingly, the petition is hereby denied and the alternative writ heretofore issued is discharged.

McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., and DRIVER, B. J., Associate Judge, concur.