alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                      |                                  |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware     |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee                 |
| Attn:  Ronaldo Reyes   | Attn: Corporate Trust Office |
| 1761 East St. Andrew Place           | Kristine Gullo                   |
| Santa Ana, CA 92705                  | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor  |
|                                      | Wilmington, DE 19809             |

|                                                  |                                 |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust, N.A.          | Ally Auto Assets LLC            |
| Attn:  Structured Finance Services | Ally Bank                       |
| Darnella Tinnel-Crawford                         | Attn: Elliot Kahan          |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700                | 601 S. Tryon Street             |
| Chicago, IL  60602                     | Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 |

|         |                                    |  |  |  |  |
|---------|------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Re: | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 |
|         | Annual Statement as to Compliance  |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |  |  |  |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                             |  |  |  |  |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|  |                                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--|-------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|  | Very truly yours,                         |
|  |                                           |
|  | /s/ David J. DeBrunner            |  |
|  | David J. DeBrunner                        |
|  | Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|  |                                           |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Environment, Safety and Health; Environment, Safety and 
Health: Extension of Opportunity To Provide Written Comments on 
Gathering Scientific Data, Information and Views Relevant to a 
Department of Energy (DOE) Beryllium Standard

Agency: Office of Environment, Safety and Health, DOE.

Action: Extension of public written comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice on December 
30, 1996, (61 FR 68725) announcing that DOE would hold two public 
forums to gather scientific data, information and views relevant to a 
DOE beryllium standard. That notice also provided the public with the 
opportunity to provide written comments on this issue with a comment 
period to end on February 7, 1997. Today's notice extends this written 
comment period to March 14, 1997.

DATES: Written comments and data (5 copies) must be received by the 
Department on or before March 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and data (5 copies) should be addressed to 
Jacqueline D. Rogers, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environment, 
Safety and Health, EH-51, 270CC, 19901 Germantown Road, Germantown, MD 
20874-1290, (301) 903-5684.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline D. Rogers, U.S. Department 
of Energy, Office of Environment, Safety and Health, EH-51, 270CC, 
19901 Germantown Road, Germantown, MD 20874-1290, (301) 903-5684.
    David Weitzman, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environment, 
Safety and Health, EH-51, 270CC, 19901 Germantown Road, Germantown, MD 
20874-1290, (301) 903-5401.
    Paul Wambach, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environment, 
Safety and Health, EH-61, 270CC, 19901 Germantown Road, Germantown, MD 
20874-1290, (301) 903-7373.

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 3, 1997.
Peter N. Brush,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and 
Health.
[FR Doc. 97-2934 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Dear Dr. Barone-

My colleagues and I at the Occupational Health Bran ch of the CA Dept of Public Health (DCPH) have been investigating the continued occurrence of serious p oisonings – including fatalties – attributable to t he use of methylene chloride in paint strippers. Nationwide, despite the existence of a FedOSHA standard, at le ast 13 fatalities have been documented among bathtub refin ishers in the last decade:

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6107a2.h tm

In addition, CDPH has investigated two California o ccupational fatalities occurring in the last two ye ars:

http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/ohb

- face/Documents/MeClChurch.pdf http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/ohb

- face/Documents/paintstripper.pdf

My colleague, Dr. Robert Harrison, can provide furt her details on these – and other – incidents. Of no te, both recent California fatalities have involved consumer -available paint stripper formulations.

Because of its high volatility and in vivo conversion to carbon monoxide, methylene chloride poses an extraordinary acute health risk to its users. In t his context, we were curious what risk mitigation o ptions the EPA might eventually consider under its work plan for t his chemical? This question is particularly salien t given the EU’s recent decision to ban the use of methylene ch loride in paint strippers other than in fixed indus trial operations with high-efficiency exhaust ventilation

.



### Methylene Chloride Work Plan Shusterman, Dennis (CDPH-DEODC) 10/01/2012 01:15 PM To: Stan Barone Cc: "Harrison, Robert (CDPH-OHB)" Hide Details From: "Shusterman, Dennis (CDPH-DEODC)" <Dennis.Shu sterman@cdph.ca.gov>

To: Stan Barone/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Harrison, Robert (CDPH-OHB)" <Robert.Harrison@ cdph.ca.gov>

History: This message has been replied to. Page 1 of 2

10/11/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\sbarone\Local Sett ings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1959.h

...Any information you can provide would be greatly ap preciated.

Best regards-

Dennis Shusterman, MD, MPH California Dept. of Public Health Occupational Health Branch / HESIS 850 Marina Bay Parkway Building P, 3rd Floor Richmond, CA 94804 510-620-5714 tel
510

- 620

- 5743 fax 

### Page 2 of 2

10/11/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\sbarone\Local Sett ings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1959.h

...
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-181-000]


Howard/Avista Energy, LLC; Notice of Filing

October 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 16, 1997, Howard/Avista Energy, LLC 
(Howard/Avista), petitioned the Commission for acceptance of its FERC 
Rate Schedule No. 1, and an order authorizing Howard/Avista to sell 
energy at market-based rates, and for certain blanket approvals, and 
the waiver of certain Commission Regulations.
    Howard/Avista intends to engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy purchases and sales as a marketer. Howard/Avista is a Washington 
limited liability company formed by Avista Energy, Inc., a wholly-owned 
subsidiary of The Washington Water Power Company, and Howard Energy 
Marketing, Inc., a wholly-owned affiliate of Howard Publications, Inc. 
Howard/Avista is not in the business of generating, transmitting, or 
distributing electric power.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 14, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29335 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 37167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15904]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7509]

Determination Under Subsection 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act of 
1974, as Amended Continuation of Waiver Authority

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the President under the Trade 
Act of 1974, as amended, Public Law 93-618, 88 Stat. 1978 (hereinafter 
``the Act''), and assigned to the Secretary of State by virtue of 
Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13346 of July 8, 2004, I determine, 
pursuant to Section 402(d)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2432(d)(1), that 
the further extension of the waiver authority granted by Section 402 of 
the Act will substantially promote the objectives of Section 402 of the 
Act. I further determine that continuation of the waiver applicable to 
Belarus will substantially promote the objectives of Section 402 of the 
Act.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 1, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-15904 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
```
Exhibit 13.1







Certification Pursuant to




18 U.S.C. Section 1350




As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Crude Carriers Corp., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands (the "Company"), for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Dated: April 18, 2011







By:
/s/ Evangelos M. MarinakisName:
Evangelos M. MarinakisTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE>
                                                                                                   EXHIBIT 12
                     COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
     Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                    (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                      Twelve
                                                                                                      Months
                                                                  Year Ended December 31,             Ended
                                                    1995       1996       1997      1998       1999   9/30/00
<S>                                               <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>      <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds. . . . . . . . $66,811    $59,711     $55,156    $47,323   $43,207  $41,064
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt. . . . . . . .   8,829     12,125      15,525     23,594    25,878   25,878
  Interest on Short-term Debt . . . . . . . . . .   1,328      2,400       5,104      3,493     2,460    1,938
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges. . . . . . . . .   4,657      4,374       4,729      4,459     4,659    4,874
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals . .   4,100      4,600       4,100      5,300     4,600    4,600
       Total Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . . . $85,725    $83,210     $84,614    $84,169   $80,804  $78,354

Earnings:
  Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$110,616   $107,108    $119,379   $133,044  $150,270 $127,686
  Plus Federal Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . .  58,648     60,302      69,760     71,202    82,686   86,079
  Plus State Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . .       7         11           6          3        89       84
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above) . . . . . . . . .  85,725     83,210      84,614     84,169    80,804   78,354
       Total Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$254,996   $250,631    $273,759   $288,418  $313,849 $292,203

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. . . . . . . .    2.97       3.01        3.23       3.42      3.88     3.72


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of Tropicana Entertainment Inc.

Tropicana Atlantic City Corp. (New Jersey corporation)Tropicana AC Sub Corp. (New Jersey corporation)New Tropicana Holdings, Inc. (Delaware corporation)New Tropicana OpCo, Inc. (Delaware corporation)Aztar Riverboat Holding Company, LLC (Indiana limited liability company)Aztar Indiana Gaming Company, LLC (Indiana limited liability company)New Jazz Enterprises, L.L.C. (Nevada limited liability company)Catfish Queen Partnership in Commendam (Louisiana)Centroplex Centre Convention Hotel, L.L.C. (Louisiana limited liability company)New St. Louis Riverboat, LLC (Nevada limited liability company)CP St. Louis Casino, LLC (Delaware limited liability company)CP St. Louis Acquisition, LLC (Delaware limited liability company)Tahoe Horizon, LLC (Delaware limited liability company)Columbia Properties Tahoe, LLC (Nevada limited liability company)CP Laughlin Realty, LLC (Delaware limited liability company)Columbia Properties Laughlin, LLC (Nevada limited liability company)Columbia Properties Vicksburg, LLC (Mississippi limited liability company)JMBS Casino LLC (Mississippi limited liability company)Lighthouse Point, LLC (Mississippi limited liability company)Tropicana Express, LLC (Nevada limited liability company)Tropicana Ent. Cayman Holdings Co. Ltd. (Cayman Islands)Abura Development Corp VBA (Aruba)Tropicana Aruba Casino Operating Co. N.V. (Aruba)Tropicana Aruba Resort Operating Corp. VBA (Aruba)


---



QuickLinks
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2002 

To amend the Social Security Act to remove the restriction on the use 

of funds under the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund to offset 

reductions in State or territory tax revenues. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. PERRY, Mrs. HINSON, Mr. 

FULCHER, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mrs. BOEBERT, 

Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. STEWART, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. CRAWFORD, 

Mr. HARRIS, Mr. DUNCAN, Ms. TENNEY, Mrs. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. 

MEUSER, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. BIGGS, Ms. HERRELL, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mrs. STEEL, Mr. C. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida, 

Mr. CLOUD, Mr. OWENS, Mr. GOODEN of Texas, Ms. FOXX, Mr. 

GIMENEZ, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, 

Mr. FEENSTRA, Mr. GUEST, Mr. CAWTHORN, and Mr. MOORE of Utah) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Social Security Act to remove the restriction 

on the use of funds under the Coronavirus State Fiscal 

Recovery Fund to offset reductions in State or territory 

tax revenues. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2002 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Let States Cut Taxes 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS 

5 UNDER CORONAVIRUS STATE FISCAL RECOV6 ERY FUND. 

7 (a) REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION.—Paragraph (2) of 

8 subsection (c) of section 602 of the Social Security Act, 

9 as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan 

10 Act of 2021 (Public Law 117–2), is amended to read as 

11 follows: 

12 ‘‘(2) FURTHER RESTRICTION ON USE OF

13 FUNDS.—No State or territory may use funds made 

14 available under this section for deposit into any pen15 sion fund.’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is 

17 further amended— 

18 (1) in subsection (d)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘, in19 cluding, in the case of a State or a territory, all 

20 modification to the State’s or territory’s tax revenue 

21 sources during the covered period’’; 

22 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘such sub23 section,’’ and all that follows through the period and 

24 inserting ‘‘such subsection.’’; and 

25 (3) in subsection (g)— 

26 (A) by striking paragraph (1); and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2002 IH

1 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) 

2 through (7) as paragraphs (1) through (6), re3 spectively. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7791
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAMON RICARDO LORA, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-6500
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAMON RICARDO LORA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR99-196-DKC, CA-02-4197-DKC) Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 20032 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. No. 02-7791 affirmed and No. 03-6500 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ramon Ricardo Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan Edwin Foreman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: The cases have been consolidated on appeal. In No. 02-7791, Ramon Ricardo Lora appea ls the district court order denying his motion to compel the Government to comply with a written agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeUnited States v. Lora , No. CR-99-196-DKC; CA-02-4197-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 6, 2002). In No. 03-6500, Lora seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for leave to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion out of time and denying reconsideration of that order. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the movant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lora has not made the requisite4 showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, in No. 02-7791, we affirm, and in No. 03-6500, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 02-7791- AFFIRMED No. 03-6500 - DISMISSED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129288 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129288 COA: 259249 Wayne CC: 95-010470 ANTHONY J. DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk