alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Rostowsky, Principal Financial Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.




This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: June 29, 2010










/s/ Steven Rostowsky


Steven Rostowsky


Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63674-63675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-243; RM-8925]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Chugwater, WY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Mountain Tower Broadcasting, 
allots Channel 258A at Chugwater, Wyoming, as the community's first 
local aural transmission service. See 61 FR 65509, December 13, 1996. 
Channel 258A can be allotted to Chugwater in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements at city reference 
coordinates. The coordinates for Channel 258A at Chugwater are North 
Latitude 41-45-36 and West Longitude 104-49-30. With this action, this 
proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 1998. A filing window for Channel 258A at 
Chugwater, Wyoming, will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue 
of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the 
Commission in a subsequent order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 96-243, adopted November 5, 1997, and 
released November 21, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.

[[Page 63675]]

Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wyoming, is 
amended by adding Chugwater, Channel 258A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-31511 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2008 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain programs relating to nonpoint source 

management, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2008 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Water Protection 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NONPOINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS. 

5 Section 319(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

6 Act (33 U.S.C. 1329(j)) is amended by striking ‘‘sub7 sections (h) and (i) not to exceed’’ and all that follows 

8 through ‘‘fiscal year 1991’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (h) 

9 and (i) $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 

10 through 2026’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2008 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

poses. nonpoint source management, and for other purto reauthorize certain programs relating to
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          93,592
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,158
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               174,342
<PP&E>                                          11,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,379
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,151
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,407
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,711
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  168,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (202)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,196
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        

</TABLE>
March 26, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANTONIO BERMUDEZ, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-15-00097-CV V.

JUANA ZAPATA, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order 

signed by the court below on November 7, 2014. Having considered the motion 

and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Emergency Capital Investment Program

FORM OF PROCESS AND CONTROLS ATTESTATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR 

Based on feedback from ECIP Participants and auditors, Treasury plans to revise the Process and 

Controls Attestation of Independent Auditor to have the attestation completed under agreed-upon 

procedures. A draft of the proposed procedures that would form the basis of the attestation along with 

the text of the revised attestation are available under the Reporting Resources – Legal Certifications 

section of the ECIP webpage.

Treasury invites comments on the revised attestation as follows:

(1) Attestation or procedures: Is there additional guidance that would be helpful to Participants 

and Independent Auditors? If so, please specify the topic, form, and level of detail of additional 

guidance that would be helpful. 

(2) Burden: Estimates of the Participant’s time and expense associated with preparing and 

completing this report are welcomed.

How to submit comments: 

Comments on the draft forms and procedures may be submitted to Treasury at ecip@treasury.gov. 

Please indicate “Auditor Attestation Comments” in the subject line. Comments are due by Monday, 

December 4, 2023.

Background:

Under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreements Article IV, Section 4.1(d)(ii):

Following the Closing Date, within one hundred twenty (120) days of the end of each fiscal year of the 

Recipient during which a Supplemental Report is submitted, the Recipient will deliver to the Investor (1) 

a certification by the Recipient that the processes and controls used to generate the Supplemental 

Reports are satisfactory and (2) an attestation with respect to the processes and controls used to 

generate the Supplemental Reports from the Recipient’s independent auditor if the Recipient is 

required to include an attestation as to its internal control over financial reporting in connection with 

the filing of audited financial statements with any Governmental Entity or self-regulatory agency.

The annual attestation covers all supplemental reports, including any revised reports, filed in the prior 

fiscal year.

1

1 For Participants with a 12/31 fiscal year-end, the attestation for the 2023 fiscal year – which will be due in April 

2024 – includes all Quarterly Supplemental Reports for 2022, since these reports were also submitted in 2023.
EXHIBIT
32.02






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Salek, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






By:
            /s/
      William SalekName:
            William
      SalekChief
      Financial OfficerDate: May 15, 2008
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■

■

★

●

●

★ ●

● ● ●
#### HERBIN PAINT & BODY WORK, Appellant, v. Irving ISICOFF, Appellee.

No. 77-428.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Abramson, Scremin, Mendigutia & Lib-man, Miami, for appellant.

Gerald Silverman, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises out of an action by appellant-tenant against appellee-landlord for wrongful eviction. The issues were tried non-jury in the Circuit Court of Dade County. A judgment for $1,850.00 compensatory damages was entered in favor of appellant. The claim for punitive damages was disallowed.

Appellant contends that the trial court’s award of compensatory damages was inadequate and contrary to the evidence and that it was error to disallow the claim for punitive damages.

We have carefully considered the points on appeal in the light of the record and briefs, and have concluded that no reversi*940ble error has been demonstrated. *Herzog v. Herzog,*346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); *American International Land Corporation v. Hanna,*323 So.2d 567 (Fla.1975); *Camacho Enterprises, Inc.*v. *Better Construction, Inc.,*343 So.2d 1296 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Daniel R. Lutz, Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: December 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel R. Lutz                    
|                        |  |  |  | Daniel R. Lutz Chief Financial
Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### Henry P. Duffy, Respondent, *vs.*Howard Gray, Appellant.

1. Practice, *civil*— Slander—Partners—Joint *judgment*— Individual *suit*— Bar. —A joint judgment, procured by partners in business in a slander suit, is no bar to a several suit by one of the partners on the same cause of action.

*Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.*

*Krum fy*Patrick, for Appellant.

I. A party can have but one satisfaction for the same wrong. (Thomas vs. Rumsey, 6 Johns. 26 ; Webb vs. Cecil, 9 B. Monroe, 198.)

II. The record showing recovery and satisfaction in the former case, was competent evidence in this case in mitigation of damages.

*Lee 8f*Adams, for Respondent.

Partners, as a partnership, cannot recover in slander *for*injury to their private feelings and personal character, but only for damages to their joint trade or business. (Collyer on Partnership, § 680 ; Story on Partnership, §§ 256, 257; Townsend on Slander, 381; Selwyn’s Nisi Prius, p. 1260; Taylor vs. Church, 1 E. D. Smith, 287; Townsend on Slander, 201.)

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action for slander. The actionable words charged in the petition are, “ Duffy & Kincer are damned thieves and swindlers.”

Duffy *&*Kincer were partners, doing business as merchants under that name, the individual members being, plaintiff' and one Abner Kincer. They had brought a joint action against the defendant for injury to their business on account of these words, and recovered a judgment for one dollar and costs, which had been paid by the defendant.

The defendant set up this former recovery and satisfaction, as a bar to this action.

On the trial the court ruled out this defense, and this ruling of the court presents the only material point for our consideration.

In my judgment, the former recovery and satisfaction were *529not admissible, either as a bar, or in mitigation of damages. This action is for a personal injury to the character of the plaintiff, and the former suit was for a joint injury to the trade and business of the firm of *“*Duffy & Kincer.” The members of the firm could have no legal interest whatever in the personal character of each other.

The slander to the individual character of each member of the firm could not be a joint tort. It was necessarily a separate and distinct injury, for which a several, and not a joint action, could be maintained. (See also, Townsend on Slander, §§ 185 and 303; Haythorn *et al.*vs. Lawson, 8 C. and P., 196.)

The only damages the partnership could have recovered was for the injury to their joint trade and business. (See Col. on Part., § 680 ; Story on Part., §§ 256, 257; Townsend on Slander, 381.)

Let the judgment be affirmed;

Judge Wagner absent, the other Judges concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1967 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to grant Puerto Rico eligibility 

to issue commercial driver’s licenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2021 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to grant Puerto 

Rico eligibility to issue commercial driver’s licenses, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHI4 CLE SAFETY. 

5 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 31301(14) of title 49, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ and inserting a comma; 

8 and 

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and Puerto Rico’’ before the 

10 period. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1967 IH

1 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Administrator of the 

2 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration shall work 

3 with Puerto Rico on obtaining full compliance with chap4 ter 313 of title 49, United States Code, and regulations 

5 adopted under that chapter. 

6 (c) GRACE PERIOD.—Notwithstanding section 

7 31311(a) of title 49, United States Code, during a 5-year 

8 period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, 

9 Puerto Rico shall not be subject to a withholding of an 

10 apportionment of funds under paragraphs (1) and (2) of 

11 section 104(b) of title 23, United States Code, for failure 

12 to comply with any requirement under section 31311(a) 

13 of title 49, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1949 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1949

 To amend section 201 of title 18, United States Code, to redefine the 
 term ``official act'' in bribery cases involving public officials to 
                strengthen accountability and oversight.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2021

  Ms. Tenney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 201 of title 18, United States Code, to redefine the 
 term ``official act'' in bribery cases involving public officials to 
                strengthen accountability and oversight.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Upholding the Integrity of Public 
Officials Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERSIGHT.

    Section 201(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
            ``(3) the term `official act' includes any action taken or 
        to be taken under color of official authority by a public 
        official or person who has been selected to be a public 
        official.''.
                                 <all>
```
Final: 12/12/03 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Case Number: P040144 Assessor: Lee ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:

Consumer use expected?INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040144INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Case Number: P040144 Assessor: Lee ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040144
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual Report of MyOtherCountryClub.com(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael F. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





By:
/s/ Michael F. SmithName:
Michael F. SmithTitle:
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerDate:
March 31, 2011





This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### James W. VACCARO, Appellant, v. Laurel Lowry VACCARO, Appellee.

No. 69-19.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 10, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 1, 1969.

Eugene P. Spellman, Miami, for appellant.

Walton & Garrick, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ..

PER CURIAM.

The husband, defendant below, appeals the financial provisions of a final judgment of divorce. We have reviewed the record and considered the points on appeal and find that with the exception of one particular, hereafter noted, the judgment should be affirmed upon the basis of the rule stated in Lauderdale v. Lauderdale, Fla.App. 1957, 96 So.2d 663; Ginsberg v. Ginsberg, Fla. App. 1959, 113 So.2d 565; Silberman v. Katcher, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 726.

The sixth paragraph of the trial judge’s findings is as follows:

> 

> 6. Defendant failed to support the Plaintiff although fully able to so do from November, 1967, to the date of Final Hearing herein except for payment of rent from July, 1968, through September, 1968, together with some minor telephone, electric and other bills, and during said period Plaintiff actually expended $4,111.50 for her own necessities.”

Pursuant to this finding the court ordered the appellant to pay the appellee: “* * * $4,111.50 by way of reimbursement to the Plaintiff for her necessities from November, 1967, to the date of Final Hearing herein in * * *.”

The finding of fact is supported in the record by a handwritten list from which the appellee testified in establishing the amount expended on necessities during the period of separation and prior to the divorce when no *743provision was made by the appellant for her support. This list includes two items which are not under the law considered necessities: (1) a pre-existing debt of $860.05; (2) an income tax payment of $69.95.

With the deletion of the sums above mentioned, the record supports the finding that the appellee expended for her support as necessities the sum of $3,181.50. The final judgment of divorce shall be amended by striking from paragraph 4(a) of the adjudication the sum of $4,111.50 and by substituting therefor the sum of $3,181.50. The final judgment as amended is affirmed.

Affirmed as amended.