alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**EXHIBIT      32.4**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred      |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Charles                N. Eldred          |
|                                |   | Senior                Vice President, and |
|                                |   | Chief                Financial Officer    |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 5, 2019 p0225

Order 

Clerk

March 5, 2019

156509 & (83)(84)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156509

COA: 331332

Gladwin CC: 15-007784-FH

JOHN LEE CARTER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of February 20, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 

2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

People v Straughter (Docket No. 156198). The appellant having now moved to amend his 

application to withdraw the issue under consideration in Straughter, that motion is 

GRANTED, and the application is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for a Franks

hearing is DENIED.
### notes : conve rsa t i on w i t h H e rb D ante R od r i gue z to: Dante Rod r i guez 02 / 09 /2012 11 : 45 AM T ue s da y , 2/9/12 S po k e w i th He r b, he had re v i ewed m yd r aft l ette r . Mann - Kenda ll A na l ys i s , a s i mp l e t rend ana l ys i s to s how s t rength of t rend. A l though ba re l yneeded. l Cou l d ha v e c ont r a cto rdo i t w i th data s ta rt i ng at po i nt whe re d i pped be l ow MCL. Add v e rt i c a l li ne to g r aph i nd i c at i ng t i me at wh i c h " atta i nment mon i to r i ng " began, wh i c h i s when MCL l wa s f i rs t atta i ned. Add ho r i z onta l li ne i nd i c at i ng l ength of t i me du r i ng wh i c h " atta i nment mon i to r i ng " o cc u rred ( 2 y ea rs) . W ill he l p e x p l a i n th i ng s to H Q . G u i dan c e f rom 1994, Ch4, l a s t page ment i on s t i mef r ame of 2 - 5 y ea rs fo rpe rfo r man c e a c h i e v ement l mon i to r i ng. Ac tua ll yHe r b th i n ks one c onf i r mat i on s amp l e wou l d be s uff i c i ent s i n c e the t i me f r ame between l s amp l e s i s s o l ong ( wou l d be 2 y ea rs s oon, Ma rc h 2010 to now ) . Ass um i ng i t s hows c on c ent r at i on rema i n s be l ow MCL; i f not, retu r n to s em i - annua l s amp li ng. Dante Rod r i gue z , P . E. Remed i a l P roj e ct Manager U. S . EPA

Reg i on 9 ( 415 ) 972 - 3166 rod r i gue z .dante @ epa.gov
TO: RCRA Docket EPA

- HQ

- RCRA

- 2012

- 0426

FROM: Richard Huggins Jr.
On August 25 , 2011, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (ORCR) staff met with Walmart to discuss the challenges they face when complying with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Some of the specific topics discussed were sustainability, waste characterization, pharmaceuticals, transportation, electronics, aerosol cans, episodic generation , and reverse logistics.

A ttendees:
Ross Elliot, Betsy Devlin, Charlotte Mooney, Richard Huggins Jr., Marilyn Goode, Kristin Fitzgerald, Jim O’Leary, Jessica Young (ORCR), David Nicholas (PARMS)

Rich D ailey, Mike Stephenson, and Rick Leahy (Walmart)
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. John Wesley MIMS, Appellee.

Nos. R-225, R-226.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Robert P. Miller, Public Defender, and William C. Johnson, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion by the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein whereby the State seeks reversal of an order discharging appellee from certain charges against him pursuant to Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 3.191, 33 F.S.A., known as the speedy trial rule.

By his motion, appellee contends that we have no jurisdiction to review an order of discharge entered under the speedy trial rule. We denied a similar motion in State v. Gravlee, our case No. Q-182, on June 6, 1972, by an unpublished administrative 'order. Thereafter, Gravlee sought a writ of prohibition in the Supreme Court1 seeking to restrain this court from exercising any jurisdiction in the State’s appeal of an order granting Gravlee a discharge under the speedy trial rule. The Supreme Court denied Gravlee’s petition for writ of prohibition on September 12, 1972. Although no opinion was written by the Supreme Court in Gravlee, we can only construe its order of denial as authority for the proposition that we do have jurisdiction to review *53orders granting discharge under the speedy trial rule.

We quite agree. Such an order is in the nature of a final judgment entered by a trial court which we have appellate jurisdiction to review. Article V, Section 5(3) F.S.A. See also the statutory authority granted by Section 924.08, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

1

. Gravlee v. Spector et al., Florida Supreme Court, 267 So.2d 82, decided September 12, 1972.
Page 22.0

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Checklist Item #22

Does the application include a discussion of any other factors the plan sponsor took into 

account including how and why those factors were taken into account?

See section 5.04.

The Trustees considered the statutory factors but did not consider others.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30807]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1190-DR]


Nebraska; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Nebraska, (FEMA-1190-DR), dated November 1, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 12, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Nebraska, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of November 1, 1997:

    Dodge County for Categories A and B under the Public Assistance 
program.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-30807 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
255 La. 907

#### 327 BOURBON STREET, INC. v. PEPE, INCORPORATED.

No. 50436.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1970.

In re: 327 Bourbon Street, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 230 So.2d 408.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 21
 Subsidiaries of Registrant
 State of
    
    PercentageCompany Name
    
    Incorporation
    
    OwnershipCICA Life Insurance Company of America
(CICA)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% DirectCitizens Academy, LLC
    
    Texas
    
    100% DirectCitizens National Life Insurance Company
(CNLIC)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectComputing Technology, Inc.
(CTI)
    
    Colorado
    
    100% IndirectFuneral Homes of America, Inc.
(FHA)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectInsurance Investors, Inc. (III)
    
    Texas
    
    100% IndirectIntegrity Capital Corporation (ICC)
    
    Indiana
    
    87% Direct
 13% IndirectIntegrity Capital Insurance Company
(ICIC)
    
    Indiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Life Insurance Company
(SPLIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% IndirectSecurity Plan Fire Insurance Company
(SPFIC)
    
    Louisiana
    
    100% Indirect
|            
|------------
|            
|EXHIBIT 15.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.: 333-167196) pertaining to the 2008 Share Incentive Plan of China
Hydroelectric Corporation of our reports dated April 27, 2012, with respect to
    the consolidated financial statements of China Hydroelectric Corporation
    and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of China
    Hydroelectric Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for
    the year ended December 31, 2011.

/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming
Beijing, Peoples Republic of China 
April 27, 2012

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1702 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1702

 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 
 agencies to submit to the Comptroller General of the United States a 
  report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or 
                      otherwise made ineffective.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2021

    Mrs. Murphy of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 
 agencies to submit to the Comptroller General of the United States a 
  report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or 
                      otherwise made ineffective.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GAO Database Modernization Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. RULES NO LONGER IN EFFECT.

    Section 801(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(D) For any rule submitted under subparagraph (A), if the Federal 
agency promulgating the rule, in whole or in part, revokes, suspends, 
replaces, amends, or otherwise makes the rule ineffective, or the rule 
is made ineffective for any other reason, the Federal agency shall 
submit to the Comptroller General a report containing--
            ``(i) the title of the rule;
            ``(ii) the Federal Register citation for the rule, if any;
            ``(iii) the date on which rule was submitted to the 
        Comptroller General; and
            ``(iv) a description of the provisions of the rule that are 
        being revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or otherwise made 
        ineffective.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### McKeown *versus*Craig.

Where lands have been sold under a *testatum vend. exp.*it is irregular to acknowledge the deed before the Court of the county in which the land is situate, after a rule has been granted in the Court from, which the process issued to show cause why the levy and subsequent proceedings should not be set aside. If the rule be made absolute, and the sale thereby set aside, the purchaser takes no title under the sheriff's deed.

Error, to the Common Pleas of *Westmoreland county.*

This was an action of ejectment to February Term, 1850, by Joseph Craig *v.*David McKeown, for about 200 acres of land. The land in dispute had belonged to the father of the plaintiff, who devised it to him on certain conditions.

A judgment was obtained in the year 1842 against Joseph Craig and another, in *Huntingdon*county. On this judgment an *alias testatum fi.fa.*issued to Westmoreland county to April Term, 1843, on which the land in dispute was levied as the property of Josejoh Craig. Inquisition was held and the property was condemned, and on 24th May, 1843, the inquisition was approved by the Common Pleas of Westmoreland county. A *testatum vend. exp.*to August Term, 1843, was issued; and on 8th August, 1843, the land was sold to Josiah M. Craig, stated to be the landlord of the defendant.

On 20th November, 1843, a rule was obtained in the Common Pleas of *Huntingdon county*to show cause, by the first day of the next term, why the levy, inquisition, and all the other proceedings on the writ and on the *testatum fi. fa.*should not be set aside.

On 22d November, 1843, the sheriff’s deed for the premises was acknowledged in the Common Pleas of Westmoreland county.

*171Afterwards, viz., on 14th January, 1844, the rule granted by the Common Pleas of *Huntingdon*county was made absolute.

After a variety of evidence had been given, a demurrer was entered, on which Burrell, J., entered judgment for the plaintiff.

It is provided, in the 96th section of the Act of 16th June,, 1836, relating to executions, that in case of *testatum*writs oL execution, the acknowledgment of the sheriff’s deed may be made “in the Court of Common Pleas of the county or District Court of the city or county, in which such real estate may be.”

Foster, for plaintiff in error.

*Cowan*and *McKinney,*for defendant.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Lewis, J.

Where lands are sold under a *testatum vend. exp.*it is irregular to acknowledge the deed before the Court of the county in which the lands are situated, after the Court which issued the process has granted a rule to show cause why the sale should not be set aside. Such acknowledgment shares the fate of the sale; and if the rule be made absolute and the sale be thereby set aside, the purchaser takes no title under the sheriff’s deed. The Court below committed no error in entering judgment for the plaintiff below.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Leslie C. ROBINETTE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Simon Williamson GEARY and Bernice Geary Henderson, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 11407.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

March 31, 1970.

*234J. Waddy Tucker, Shreveport, for appellants.

Booth, Lockard, Jack, Pleasant & Le-Sage, by R. Perry Pringle, Shreveport, for appellee.

Before DIXON, PRICE, and WILLIAMS, JJ.

DIXON, Judge.

On the day fixed for submission of this case the appellant made no appearance, nor had filed any brief.

Under the authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, the appeal should be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.

    Name of Sep: Bone Structure and Gene Expression.
    Date: December 19, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.--adjournment.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20814.
    Contact Person: Tommy L. Broadwater, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Rm 5AS25U, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, Telephone: 301-594-4952.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review a grant application.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The 
discussion of this application could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
application, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.846, 
Project Grants in Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease 
Research], National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 19, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-30925 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2019 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2019

To amend the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 to include certain services 
    in the definition of critical services for purposes of repair, 
          restoration, and replacement of damaged facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2021

   Miss Gonzalez-Colon (for herself and Ms. Plaskett) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 to include certain services 
    in the definition of critical services for purposes of repair, 
          restoration, and replacement of damaged facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPAIR, RESTORATION, AND REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED FACILITIES.

    Section 20601 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-
123) is amended by inserting ``, and including, for purposes of this 
section, solid waste management, stormwater management, public housing, 
transportation infrastructure, and medical care,'' before ``for the 
duration''.
                                 <all>
```
(b) is the monthly benefit that would have been paid to 

the Participant had he been age 65 at the time of 

his leaving Covered Employment and he had then been 

eligible for the benefits set forth in Section 

3.2., and 

(c) is 1/30th. 

3. a~~u.fitAmountof-Ve~ste4peusion at Early Retirem.nt 

Aq.. - The Participant may elect to have his vested pension beqin 

at any age between 55 and 65. In such a case, the amount of his 

vested benefit will be the product of (a), (b) and (c) as shown 

below in this section. 

(a) is the number of years of total credited service 

not exceeding 30. 

(b) is the monthly benefit that would have been paid to 

the Participant, at the early retirement age chosen 

by him, according to the schedule of Early Service 

Retirement Pensions shown in Section 3.4. 

(c) is 1/30th. 

Disability Retirement Pensiop 

3.9 Bliqibility - A Participant shall be eligible for a 

Disability Retirement Pension in lieu of an Early Service 

Retirement Pension, upon approval by the Trustees, when he has mat 

all of the following conditions: 

(a) He becomes totally and permanently disabled so as 

to be unable to engage in any substantial gainful 

- 15 -
activity by reason of a medically determinable 

physical or mental impair=ent. 

(b) He has become qualified to receive disability 

benefits provided by the Federal Social Security 

Act. 

(c) Such disability has con~inued for six consecutive 

m.onths. 

(d) He has met the conditions for an Early Service 

Retirement Pension as set forth in Section 3.3(a). 

3.10 Senetit Amount - The monthly Disability Retirement 

pension shall be equal to 80\ of the Normal Service Retirement 

Pension which such Participant would have received if he had 

continued to work until age 65. 

Gen.ral Provisions 

3.11 Change ot Employer - A Participant shall carry his 

pension credits with him when he transfers from one participating 

Employer to another, if there is a lay-off and re-hirinq, provided 

the Participant is reemployed by a participatinq Employer. 

3.12 Election of PensioDs - If a Participant is eligible 

for more than one type of pension under this Plan, he shall b. 

entitled-to elect the type of pension he wishes to receive. 

J.13 Minimum Normal Retirem.nt PensioD Normal 

Retirement Pension shall in no event be less than the greatest 

Early Retirement Pension of Participan~ could have been eligible 

for had he elected an Early Retirement. Upon a participant 

- 16 -
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   August      14, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Patricia K. Collawn              |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                        |   | Patricia      K. Collawn                  |
|                                        |   | Utilities      President                  |
|                                        |   | Public      Service Company of New Mexico |