alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

Investment Company Act file number  811-04760

 

DWS Advisor Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 9/30 |
|--------------------------|------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 03/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

----
<TABLE>


                                   Exhibit ll

                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


                                                               Two Quarters Ended 
                                                       --------------------------------
                                                       July 31, 1998      July 31, 1997
                                                       -------------      -------------
<S>                                                    <C>                <C>
Basic:

Net income                                             $   2,121,000      $   2,424,000

Weighted average shares outstanding                        4,716,000          4,773,000
                                                       -------------      -------------

Basic income per common share                          $         .45      $         .51
                                                       =============      =============


Diluted:

Net income
                                                       $   2,121,000       $  2,424,000
Less - net income allocated to subsidiary
    dilutive options
    outstanding                                              (74,000)          (156,000)
                                                       -------------        -----------

Net income used in calculation of diluted
    income per common share                            $   2,047,000        $ 2,268,000
                                                       ==============       ============


Weighted average shares outstanding                        4,716,000          4,773,000

Plus- common  equivalent  shares  (determined
   using the "treasury stock" method
   representing shares issuable upon exercise
   of stock options                                          205,000            315,000
                                                       -------------        ------------

Weighted average number of shares used in
   calculation of diluted income per common share          4,921,000          5,088,000
                                                       =============       ============


Primary income per common share                        $         .42       $        .45
                                                       =============       ============

</TABLE>
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00311CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Eugene R. McGrath, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York,Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or l5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/    Eugene R. McGrath
REASON FOR ISSUE: To revise the task interval for discard task 52−11−41−101* (was 1500 L COMPONENT).

ACTION: Replace task 52−11−41−101* with the task that follows:

Source Document Ref. No. Chapter 5 Task No. Task Title Task Interval

RBR−C700−301

Rev. AK−1

52−11−41−101 *

(one star)

Discard the Passenger Door Tensator Spring, Part No.

GS321−0580−1

PHASE−IN: For aircraft with passenger door tensator

springs with more than 550 Landings COMPONENT, as of

the date of TL/MC Temporary Revision 5−2−13 (Jun

04/2014), this task must be accomplished within 6 Months

from the date of TR 5−2−13 or

1500 Landings COMPONENT, whichever comes first.

650 L

COMPONENT 

Jun 04/2014

5

−10

−11 Page 1 of 1 PART 2 TR 5

−

2

−13

BD−700 TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS

TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5−2−13

INSERT IN SECTION 5−10−11

FACING PAGE 4

NOTE: Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of this

manual and LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of Part 2.

EFFECTIVITY: ALL
Exhibit
99.3.2  Certification
Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Edward J. Rasmussen, the Chief Financial Officer of
Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,
which this statement accompanies, (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edward J.
  RasmussenEdward J.
  RasmussenDated:
  May 15, 2003   A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Michael J. Shea, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: |  | December 30, 2003 |  | /s/ Michael J. Shea                    
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|      |  |                   |  |                                        
|      |  |                   |  | Michael J. Shea
Chief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit













Extension of term for that certain Change in Control and Severance Agreement effective as of 
[Date] (the “Agreement”)




Dear [Name],


New Relic, Inc. desires to amend the terms of the above-referenced Agreement, which sets forth certain protections you have in the event of your termination of employment with us, in order to extend the effectiveness of the Agreement. 


Accordingly, effective as of the date of the last signature hereto, and pursuant to the terms set forth in Section 1 of the Agreement, the Agreement will remain in effect until December 31, 2020.


Please note that, except as set forth above with respect to the effectiveness of the Agreement, this letter does not modify the Agreement you have entered into with us in any way, including that your employment relationship with us is and shall remain at-will. 


The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this letter agreement shall be governed by the internal substantive laws, but not the conflicts of law rules, of the State of California.  This letter agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
 
NEW RELIC, INC.
	
		
	 
	By:

	 
	 

	 
	Name:

	 
	 

	 
	Title

	 
	 

	 
	Date:

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	[Full Name]
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Date:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62765-62766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30888]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-385-000]

PECO Energy Company; Notice of Filing

November 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 30, 1997, PECO Energy Company (PECO), 
filed an executed Transmission Agency Agreement between PECO and Enron 
Power Marketing Inc., (hereinafter Supplier). The terms and conditions 
contained within this Agreement are identical to the terms and 
conditions contained with the Form of Transmission Agency Agreement 
submitted to the Commission on October 3, 1997, as part of the joint 
filing by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and the 
Pennsylvania PJM Utilities at Docket No. ER98-64-000. This filing 
merely submits an individual executed copy of the Transmission Agency 
Agreement between PECO and an alternative supplier participating in 
PECO's Retail Access Pilot Program.
    Copies of the filing were served on the Supplier and the 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before

[[Page 62766]]

December 1, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30888 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Computer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “PeriodicReport”), I, Dennis Conroy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does herebycertify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

1.

the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78mor 78o(d)); and

 

2.

the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 9, 2008 | /s/    DENNIS CONROY |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                    | Dennis  Conroy                 |
|                    | *Chief Executive Officer*      |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Computer Horizons Corp. and will be retained by Computer HorizonsCorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of this Period Report or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

1

----
Exhibit ll

                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>

                                                                           Quarter Ended
                                                           -------------------------------------------
                                                           April 30, 1999               April 30, 1998
<S>                                                        <C>                        <C>
BASIC

Net income                                                 $         959,000          $        840,000

Weighted average shares outstanding                                4,456,000                 4,719,000
                                                           -----------------          ----------------

Basic income per common share                              $             .22          $            .18
                                                            ================           ===============



DILUTED

Net income                                                 $         959,000          $        840,000
Less - net income allocated to subsidiary
    dilutive stock options outstanding                               (44,000)                  (22,000)
                                                           ------------------         -----------------

Net income used in calculation of diluted
    income per share                                       $         915,000          $        818,000
                                                            ================           ===============


Weighted average shares outstanding                                4,456,000                 4,719,000

Plus- common  equivalent  shares  (determined
  using the "treasury stock" method)
  representing shares issuable upon exercise
  of stock options                                                   208,000                   206,000
                                                                     -------                   -------

Weighted average number of shares used in
    calculation of diluted income per common share                 4,664,000                 4,925,000
                                                           =================          ================


Diluted income per common share                            $             .20          $            .17
                                                            ================           ===============

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterlyperiod ended June 30, 2003 (the “Periodic Report”), I, William J. Murphy,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 
| Date:  | November 9, 2004 |                                       | /s/ William J. Murphy |   |
|--------|------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   |             | William J. Murphy  Chief Executive Officer |                  |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Howard Mah, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United States Commodity Index Funds Trust;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Howard MahName:

Title:
Howard Mah

Chief Financial Officer

United States Commodity Funds LLC,

Sponsor of United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6894

ANDRE STEED, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-04-458-2-RBS) Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 5, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Steed, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Andre Steed seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Steed has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Steed’s motions for appointment of counsel and for an evidentiary hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Mississippi Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Mississippi Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
6:00 p.m. and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 25, 1997, at 
the Cabot Lodge, 2375 North State Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39202. 
The purpose of the meeting is to review and vote on a draft report, 
Civic Crisis and Civic Challenge: Police Community Relations in 
Jackson.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the 
Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, February 4, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-3141 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order Lansing, Michigan September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134443 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE ALYSSA ANNE KEAST and AMBER MARIE KEAST, Minors,

_____________ _______________ _____________ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v TIMOTHY ATWOOD and BARBARA ATWOOD, Respondents-Appellants,
v SC: 134443 COA: 277354
and Newaygo CC: 05-006388-NA

NICOLE COPPESS, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 17, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 10, 2007 Clerk