Interim Decision #1654 

ALVA-Leg Or TING 

In Deportation Proceedings 

A-9301237 

Decided by Board September 30, 1966 

An alien who, following his initial entry into thin country no a nonimmigrant 

crewman in 1945, thereafter sailed continuously on vessels of American 

registry, entering the United States as a nonimmigrant crewman at least 

33 times up to his last entry -as a crewman in 1953, during which period 

'his home port was San -Francisco and his longest absence between trips 

was 4 months, Vas had his residence in the United States continuously since 

such entry for. the purposes of section 24.9, Immigration and Nationality 

Act, as amended. [Matter of 8 I. & N. Dee. 46,3, distinguished.] 

Damon: 

Order: Act of 1952—Section 141(a) (2) (8 V.S.O. 1251(a) (2)3—Nonimmigrant, remained longer. 

The respondent, an unmarried male alien, 52 years of age, is a native and citizen of China.. He has been found deportable as a. nonimmigrant crewman who remained longer than permitted. An order 

entered by the special inquiry officer o(June 17, 1966 suspended the 

respondent's deportation under the provisions of section 244(a) (1) 

of the Immigratimi and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 

1254(a) (1)). The order also denied the respondent's application 

for the creation of a record of lawful admission for permanent residence pursuant to section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1259). The respondent took no appeal 

from the decision of the special inquiry officer. The case has been 

certified by the special inquiry officer for final decision by the Board 

Of Immigration Appeals on the issue of the respondent's eligibility 

for the creation of a record of lawful admission for permanent residence pursuant to section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act, as amended (supra). 

The respondent originally arrived in the United States during the 

spring of 1945 as a crewman aboard a British ship. He deserted the 

849 
Interim Decision *1654 

British ship and on April 9, 1945 signed -on an American ship at the 

port of San Francisco. Theieafter, he sailed on American vessels 

continuously until his last entry on October 16, 1953. He was admitted as a crewman on this occasion and failed to depart within 

the 29-day limitation. Deportability on the charge stated in the 

order to show cause is conceded. 

Section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, 

provides in substance that the Attorney General may create a, record 

of admission for permanent residence in the case of an alien who 

affirmatively establishes (a) that he entered the -United States prior 

to June 30, 1948, (b) that he had had his residence' in the United 

States Continuously since such entry, (c) that he is a person of good 

moral character and (d) that he is not ineligible to citizenship. The 

special inquiry officer finds that the respondent has affirmatively established that he is not ineligible.to citizenship; that he is a person 

of good moral character and that he entered the United States prior 

to June 30, 1948. He finds the respondent ineligible for the creation 

of a record of lawful admission for permanent residence under section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, on 

the ground that the respondent has not established that he has had 

his "residence" in the United States continuously since such entry. 

The facts with regard to the issue of "residence" are not in dispute. They establish that following the respondent's original entry 

in 1945 he entered the United States during the next nine years at 

least 33 times as a noninimigrarit crewman. His longest absence between trips was approximately four months. 

The respondent testified that he has considered the United States 

as his home since 1945. When in San Francisco,' his home port, he 

always stayed at the same place, 848 Kearny Street. There is evidence that in the event the respondent was discharged at a port in 

the United States, other than San Francisco, the steamship eompany 

-would provide transportation money for his return to San Francisco. 

The respondent was injured in 1953 while serving on an American 

vessel en route to Japan. He was hospitalized in Japan and upon 

his recovery returned to the United States as a passenger. Although 

he did not work as a crewman, he was admitted on October 16, 1953, 

his last entry, as a crewman. 

Section 101(a) (SS) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 

defines the term "residence" as follows: 

(33) The term "residence" means the place of general abode; the place of 

general abode of a person means his principal, actual dwelling place in fact, 

without regard to intent . . . 

850 
Interim Decision #1654 

The special inquiry officer relying on the Assistant Commissioner's 

decision in Matter of 1.9 -1—B—, 8 I. & N. Dec. 463, 465,2concludes 

that the respondent's temporary admission as a crewman over a 

period of years would not support a claim of "continuous residence" 

in the United States for the purpose of'qualifying under section 249 

of the ImmigratiOn and Nationality Act, as amended. Counsel for 

the respondent maintains that the Assistant Commissioner's opinion 

does not apply in the respondent's case for the reason that the facts 

are distinguishable. 

We agree. Sit Jay Sing originally entered the United States as a 

crewman in 1939. He did. not depart within the 29-day limitation. 

A warrant for his arrest in deportation proceedings was served upon 

him on June 26, 1942. A hearing was accorded and on February 12, 

1943 a warrant of deportation was issued. Sit Jay Sing departed 

foreign as a crewman aboard an American vessel on September 22, 

1945. The Immigration Service noted "executed" on the warrant 

of deportation. 

The issue before the court in the Bit "ay Sinui case was whether 

the alien's departure at a time, when a warrant of deportation was 

outstanding against him, interrupted the continuous residence he 

had established in the United States since his original entry in 1939. 

Sit Jay Sing conceded that he "effected his own deportation" when 

he voluntarily departed foreign in September of 1945 at a time when 

a warrant of deportation was outstanding. He maintained, however, 

that ;there was no interruption in his residency in this particular 

instance because he departed foreign voluntarily with the permission 

of the Immigration Service aboard a vessel of United States registry. 

The court held that a departure from the United States under a 

warraiit of deportation break the continuity of residence for the 

purpose of section 249 and the fact that the Immigration Service 

consented to his departure as a crewman did not lessen the force of 

deportation. In its discussion of whether . deportation interrupts 

residence the court assumed that residency in the United States can 

be made out by an alien while aboard a vessel of United States 

registry (182 F. Supp. 292, 294, Note 5). 

A foreign voyage by an alien seaman on a vessel of United States 

registry does not terminate the constitutional protection he enjoyed 

'The decision of the Assistant Commissioner dated October 20, 1559 weal: 

sustained by the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California, Southern Division on March 11, 1960. Sit Jay Sing, Plaintiff T. 

H. D. Nice, District Director, 182 F. Supp. 292, affirmed in a per curiam 

opinion by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 287 11`.2d 561 (March 

7. 1061). 

851 
Interim. Decision #1654 

prior to his departure. Kwang Hai Chew v. Golding, 344 U.S. 590. 

Applying the foregoing principle to the present case, We conclude 

that the respondent's service aboard a vessel of United States registry since his original entry in 1945 may be deemed as "continuous 

•esidente" in the United States for the purpose of qualifying for the 

creation of a record of lawful admission for permanent residence 

pursuant to the provisions of section 249 of the Immigration and 

Nationality Act. The respondent's several departures as an alien 

crewman since his original entry in 1945 have not been under an 

order and warrant of deportation. This factor distinguishes the 

case before us from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner in 

the case of S--J—.6—, 8 I. & N. Dec. 463. Cf. Roggenbila v. Lusby 

et al., The Malden, 116.Fed. Supp. 315, 318• (U.S.D.C. Mass., 1953). 

ORDER: It is directed that the alien's application for the creation of a record of lawful admission for permanent residence pursuant to the provisions of section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, be and the same is hereby granted. 

It is further directed that the order entered by the special inquiry 

officer on June 1'7, 1966 be and the same is hereby withdrawn. 

852