alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31374]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-363-002]

Egan Hub Partners, L.P.; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 19, 1997, Egan Hub Partners, L.P., 
(Egan Hub) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, tariff sheets to the filing, with an effective date of 
November 3, 1997.
    Egan Hub states that the filing is being filed in compliance with 
an October 30, 1997, Letter Order of the Director, Office of Pipeline 
Regulation.
    Egan Hub states that in compliance with that Letter Order the 
tariff sheets reflect the following: (i) Incorporates by reference GISB 
Standard 1.3.16, which relates to fuel reimbursement on nominations; 
(ii) includes in its tariff an internet address to its HTML page; (iii) 
conforms the electronic format of the tariff to the paper format of the 
tariff, including the inclusion in the electronic version of the tariff 
a sheet that had been omitted, as well as making editorial and 
pagination corrections; and (iv) conforms Egan Hub's filing to the 
redlining and strikeout provisions set forth in the Commission's 
Regulations.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
to the proceeding. A copy of this filing is on file with the Commission 
and is available for public inspection in the public reference room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31374 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50525 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAGOBERTO TERRAZAS-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CR-191

- - - - - - - - - - June 2, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dagoberto Terrazas-Chavez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Terrazas-Chavez argues that his prior burglary conviction was an element of the offense and should have been alleged in the indictment. The Supreme Court has rejected this argument. Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 118 S. Ct. 1219, 1226 (1998). Terrazas-Chavez argues that the district court abused itsNo. 97-50525 -2- discretion in failing to order sua sponte a hearing to determine whether he was mentally competent at the time he entered his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and have determined that the district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order sua sponte a hearing to retroactively determine Terrazas-Chavez’s mental competence at the time he entered his guilty plea. See United States v. Davis , 61 F.3d 291, 303-04 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2050 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2050

  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-
month waiting period for disability insurance benefits under such title 
  and waive the 24-month waiting period for Medicare eligibility for 
                 individuals with Huntington's disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2021

  Mr. Pascrell (for himself, Mr. Kinzinger, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Bishop of 
 Georgia, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. Hill, 
  Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Cohen, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Payne, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. 
Sires, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Lawson of 
Florida, Mr. Kilmer, Ms. Herrera Beutler, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Meeks, Mr. 
Rodney Davis of Illinois, Ms. DeGette, and Mr. Grijalva) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-
month waiting period for disability insurance benefits under such title 
  and waive the 24-month waiting period for Medicare eligibility for 
                 individuals with Huntington's disease.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Huntington's Disease Disability 
Insurance Access Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF WAITING PERIOD FOR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY 
              INSURANCE BENEFITS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HUNTINGTON'S 
              DISEASE.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 423(a)(1)) is amended, in the matter following subparagraph (E), 
by inserting ``or Huntington's disease'' after ``amyotrophic lateral 
sclerosis''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to applications for disability insurance benefits 
filed after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. WAIVER OF 24-MONTH WAITING PERIOD FOR COVERAGE UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HUNTINGTON'S 
              DISEASE.

    (a) In General.--Section 226(h) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 426(h)) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
inserting ``or Huntington's disease (HD)'' after ``amyotrophic lateral 
sclerosis (ALS)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to benefits under title XVIII of the Social Security Act with 
respect to items and services furnished in months beginning after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
| (1) | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                    |   |   |   |
|--------------|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| By:     | /s/ Longgen Zhang       |   |   |   |
|         |                    |   |   |   |
| Name:        | Longgen Zhang           |   |   |   |
| Title:  | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |
| Date:        | September 2, 2011       |   |   |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
              APPENDIX A TO ITEM 601(X) OF REGULATION S-K
                  COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
                     ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000023259
<NAME> CT COMMUNICATIONS INC /NC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,205,868
<SECURITIES>                                 1,080,890
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,762,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,792,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,512,394
<PP&E>                                     127,685,896
<DEPRECIATION>                              69,459,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,226,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,097,024
<BONDS>                                      4,229,000
<COMMON>                                     2,707,697
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          175,000
<PREFERRED>                                  1,692,641
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,767,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               107,025,988
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,362,101
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,546,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               986,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               208,436
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             335,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,883,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,824,696
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,059,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,059,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    20.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    20.21
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63202-63203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences; 
Committee of Visitors; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences, Committee of Visitors (1171).
    Date and Time: December 11-12 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Rm. 970, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    For Further Information Contact: Dr. Jonathan Leland, Program 
Director, Decision, Risk and Management Sciences Program National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1757.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including examination of decisions on proposals, reviewer 
comments, and other privileged materials.
    Agenda: To provide oversight review of the Decision, Risk and 
Management Sciences Program.
    Reason for Closing: The meeting is closed to the public because 
the Committee is reviewing proposal actions that will include 
privileged intellectual property and personal

[[Page 63203]]

information that could harm individuals if they are disclosed. If 
discussions were open to the public, these matters that are exempt 
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine 
Act would be improperly disclosed.

    Dated: November 21, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-31122 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022198
<NAME> COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,870,703
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     24,389
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         197,875
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        20,389
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 394,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,508,201
<COMMON>                                        41,026
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      574,638
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            100,316
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 715,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           75,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           897,164
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              17,625
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  41,450
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     27,988
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 5,199
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 727,795
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,508,201
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      843,333
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            51,808
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     643,521
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     695,329
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        148,004
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (1,356)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 146,648
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        59,267
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,381
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      4,537
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   82,844
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        56,907
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       45,865
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         205,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 10311.

#### Eyre, a Taxpayer, *v.*City of Norwood et al.

(Decided December 4, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton County.

*Messrs. Kinkead, Rogers & Ellis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. O. F. Dwyer,*city solicitor, and *Mr. John V. Campbell,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
U.S. Department of the Treasury

State Small Business Credit Initiative (SSBCI) Program

Application Deadlines Extended for Tribal Governments

April 2022

The U.S. Department of the Treasury is extending the deadline for Tribal governments to initiate 

and submit their complete SSBCI Capital Program application to September 1, 2022, at 

11:59 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) and the deadline to submit an application for the SSBCI Technical 

Assistance (TA) Grant Program to September 1, 2022, at 11:59 p.m. ET. Only 

Tribal governments that submit or are part of a Tribal joint application that submits a Capital 

Program application are eligible to submit or be part of a Tribal joint application that submits an 

application for the TA Grant Program.

To participate in the SSBCI program, Tribal governments were required to submit a Notice of 

Intent (NOI) to Treasury by December 11, 2021. A list of Tribal governments that submitted an 

NOI by this deadline can be found on Treasury’s website. 

Treasury seeks to support all Tribal governments that are interested in participating in SSBCI. 

Treasury will provide information and technical assistance on capital applications to Tribal 

governments that submit questions to SSBCI_Information@treasury.gov.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30444]



[[Page 62037]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-408-001]


Trailblazer Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 25, 1997, Trailblazer Pipeline Company, 
(Trailblazer) tendered for filing recalculated rates and work papers as 
directed by the Commission in ordering paragraph C of the Commission's 
order issued July 31, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-408-000.
    Trailblazer states that copies of its filing have been served upon 
all parties on the Official Service List in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed on or before November 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30444 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Aluminum Foil, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Aluminum Foil, Inc. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: September 28, 2011 |   |                                                                                           |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                           |
|                      |   |                                                                                           |
|                      |   | /s/ Chuanhong Xie                                                                              |
|                      |   | Chuanhong Xie                                                                                  |
|                      |   | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director |
|                      |   | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)    |
|                      |   | China Aluminum Foil, Inc.                                                                      |
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1324 MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. NESSCAP, INC. and NESSCAP CO., LTD., Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California

in case no. 06-CV-2311, Judge John A. Houston.

ON MOTION ORDER The court having received no response to its March 19, 2009 order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion to vacate the preliminary injunction is denied and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California so that the district court may consider whether to vacate the preliminary injunction, due to settlement. FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly FILED Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: David C. Doyle, Esq. George W. Neuner, Esq. s8 APR 2 3 2009

JHN riütibilut CLERK 

# APR 2 32009 Date /s/ Jan Horbalv
Employee Retention Tax Credit: What You Need to Know

Overview

The employee retention tax credit is a broad based refundable tax credit designed to encourage 

employers to keep employees on their payroll. The credit is 50% of up to $10,000 in wages paid by an 

employer whose business is fully or partially suspended because of COVID-19 or whose gross receipts 

decline by more than 50%. 

Availability

1. The credit is available to all employers regardless of size including tax exempt organizations. There are

only two exceptions: (1) state and local governments and their instrumentalities and (2) small 

businesses who take Small Business Loans

2. To qualify, the employer has to meet one of two alternative tests. The tests are calculated each 

calendar quarter – Either

o the employer’s business is fully or partially suspended by government order due to COVID-19

during the calendar quarter or

o the employer’s gross receipts are below 50% of the comparable quarter in 2019. Once the 

employer’s gross receipts go above 80% of a comparable quarter in 2019 they no longer qualify 

after the end of that quarter.

Calculation of the Credit

The amount of the credit is 50% of the qualifying wages paid up to $10,000 in total

It is effective for wages paid after March 13th and before December 31, 2020

The definition of qualifying wages varies by whether an employer had, on average, more or less than 

100 employees in 2019

Less than 100. If the employer had 100 or fewer employees on average in 2019, then the credit is based 

on wages paid to all employees whether they actually worked or not. In other words, even if the 

employees worked full time and got paid for full time work, the employer still gets the credit.

Greater than 100. If the employer had more than 100 employees on average in 2019, then the credit is 

allowed only for wages paid to employees who did not work during the calendar quarter.

In both cases, “wages” includes not just cash payments but also a portion of the cost of employer 

provided health care.

Payment

Employers can be immediately reimbursed for the credit by reducing the amount of payroll taxes they 

have withheld from employees’ wages that they are required to deposit with the Treasury.
#### John A. SHAW, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 52389.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 30, 1978.

Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stuart M. Lerner, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Glenn H. Mitchell and Charles A. Stampelos, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

BOYD, Justice.

Reversed and remanded for new trial. Section 812.14(3), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional and may not be applied in a proceeding following remand of the cause. *McMillan v. State,*358 So.2d 547 (1978).

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, SUND-BERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., dissents.