63836 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

provision, regardless of whether it has been

modified, altered, or repaired in the area

subject to the requirements of this AD. For

airplanes that have been modified, altered, or

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required within the next 30

days after the effective date of this AD, unless

already accomplished.

To prevent loss of airplane control or

engine overspeed with consequent loss of

engine power caused by the power levers

being positioned below the flight idle stop

while the airplane is in flight, accomplish the

following:

(a) Amend the Limitations Section of the

airplane flight manual (AFM) by inserting the

following language:

Positioning of power levers below the

flight idle stop while the airplane is in

flight is prohibited. Such positioning

may lead to loss of airplane control or

may result in an overspeed condition

and consequent loss of engine power.

(b) This action may be accomplished by

incorporating a copy of this AD into the

Limitations Section of the AFM.

(c) Amending the AFM, as required by this

AD, may be performed by the owner/operator

holding at least a private pilot certificate as

authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.7), and must

be entered into the aircraft records showing

compliance with this AD in accordance with

section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR 43.9).

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an equivalent level of safety may be

approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, 1801

Airport Road, Wichita, Kansas. The request

shall be forwarded through an appropriate

FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add

comments and then send it to the Manager,

Wichita ACO.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Wichita ACO.

(f) Information related to this AD may be

examined at the FAA, Central Region, Office

of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E.

12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.

(g) This amendment (39–10227) becomes

effective on January 21, 1998.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on

November 25, 1997.

Michael Gallagher,

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft

Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 97–31678 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 97–CE–20–AD; Amendment 39–

10226; AD 97–25–03]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon

Aircraft Company 65, 90, 99, 100, 200,

300, 1900, and 2000 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD) that

applies to all Raytheon Aircraft

Company (Raytheon) 65, 90, 99, 100,

200, 300, 1900, and 2000 series

airplanes. This AD requires amending

the Limitations Section of the airplane

flight manual (AFM) to prohibit lifting

or positioning the power levers below

the flight idle stop while the airplane is

in flight. This AFM amendment will

include a statement of consequences if

the limitation is not followed. This AD

results from numerous incidents and

five documented accidents involving

airplanes equipped with turboprop

engines where the propeller beta was

improperly utilized during flight. The

actions specified by this AD are

intended to prevent nose down pitch

and a descent rate leading to aircraft

damage and injury to personnel caused

by the power levers being positioned

below the flight idle stop or the power

levers being lifted while the airplane is

in flight.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 21, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Information related to this

AD may be examined at the Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA), Central

Region, Office of the Regional Counsel,

Attention: Rules Docket No. 97–CE–20–

AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street,

Kansas City, Missouri 64106.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Schinstock, Aerospace

Engineer, Wichita Aircraft Certification

Office, FAA, 1801 Airport Road,

Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316)

946–4162; facsimile (316) 946–4407.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Events Leading to the Issuance of This

AD

A proposal to amend part 39 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 39) to include an AD that would

apply to the following was published in

the Federal Register as a notice of

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on July 2,

1997 (62 FR 35704): Raytheon Models

65–90, 65–A90, 65–A90–1, 65–A90–3,

65–A90–4, B90, C90, C90(SE), C90A,

C90B, E90, F90, H90, 99, 99A, A99,

A99A, B99, C99, 100, A100, A100A,

A100C, B100, 200, 200C, 200CT, 200T,

A200, A200C, A200CT, B200, B200C,

B200T, B200CT, 300, B300, B300C,

1900, 1900C, 1900D, and 2000

airplanes.

The NPRM proposed to require

amending the Limitations Section of the

AFM to prohibit lifting or positioning

the power levers below the flight idle

stop while the airplane is in flight,

including a statement of consequences if

the limitation is not followed. This AFM

amendment shall consist of the

following language:

Do not lift the power levers in flight.

Lifting the power levers in flight or moving

the power levers in flight below the flight

idle position could result in nose down pitch

and a descent rate leading to aircraft damage

and injury to personnel.

The NPRM was the result of

numerous incidents and five

documented accidents involving

airplanes equipped with turboprop

engines where the propeller beta was

improperly utilized during flight.

Interested persons have been afforded

an opportunity to participate in the

making of this amendment. No

comments were received on the

proposed rule or the FAA’s

determination of the cost to the public.

The FAA’s Determination

After careful review of all available

information related to the subject

presented above, the FAA has

determined that air safety and the

public interest require the adoption of

the rule as proposed except for minor

editorial corrections. The FAA has

determined that these minor corrections

will not change the meaning of the AD

and will not add any additional burden

upon the public than was already

proposed.

Compliance Time of This AD

The FAA has determined that the

compliance time of this AD should be

specified in calendar time instead of

hours time-in-service. While the

condition addressed by this AD is

unsafe while the airplane is in flight, the
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 63837

condition is not a result of repetitive

airplane operation; the potential of the

unsafe condition occurring is the same

on the first flight as it is for subsequent

flights. The compliance time of ‘‘30 days

after the effective date of this AD’’ will

not inadvertently ground airplanes and

would assure that all owners/operators

of the affected airplanes accomplish this

AD in a reasonable time period.

Cost Impact

The FAA estimates that 3,093

airplanes in the U.S. registry will be

affected by this AD, that it will take

approximately 1 workhour per airplane

to incorporate the required AFM

amendment, and that the average labor

rate is approximately $60 an hour. Since

an owner/operator who holds at least a

private pilot’s certificate can accomplish

this AD, as authorized by sections 43.7

and 43.9 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR 43.7 and 43.9), the

only cost impact upon the public is the

time it will take the affected airplane

owner/operators to amend the AFM or

POH.

Regulatory Impact

The regulations adopted herein will

not have substantial direct effects on the

States, on the relationship between the

national government and the States, or

on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government. Therefore, in

accordance with Executive Order 12612,

it is determined that this final rule does

not have sufficient federalism

implications to warrant the preparation

of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I

certify that this action (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)

will not have a significant economic

impact, positive or negative, on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act. A copy of the final

evaluation prepared for this action is

contained in the Rules Docket. A copy

of it may be obtained by contacting the

Rules Docket at the location provided

under the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation

safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration amends part 39 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding a new airworthiness directive

(AD) to read as follows:

97–25–03 Raytheon Aircraft Company:

Amendment 39–10226; Docket No. 97–

CE–20–AD.

Applicability: Models 65–90, 65–A90, 65–

A90–1, 65–A90–3, 65–A90–4, B90, C90,

C90(SE), C90A, C90B, E90, F90, H90, 99,

99A, A99, A99A, B99, C99, 100, A100,

A100A, A100C, B100, 200, 200C, 200CT,

200T, A200, A200C, A200CT, B200, B200C,

B200T, B200CT, 300, B300, B300C, 1900,

1900C, 1900D, and 2000 airplanes, all serial

numbers, certificated in any category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

modified, altered, or repaired in the area

subject to the requirements of this AD. For

airplanes that have been modified, altered, or

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required within the next 30

days after the effective date of this AD, unless

already accomplished.

To prevent nose down pitch and a descent

rate leading to aircraft damage and injury to

personnel caused by the power levers being

positioned below the flight idle stop or the

power levers being lifted while the airplane

is in flight, accomplish the following:

(a) Amend the Limitations Section of the

airplane flight manual (AFM) by inserting the

following language:

Do not lift the power levers in flight.

Lifting the power levers in flight or moving

the power levers in flight below the flight

idle position could result in nose down pitch

and a descent rate leading to aircraft damage

and injury to personnel.

(b) This action may be accomplished by

incorporating a copy of this AD into the

Limitations Section of the AFM.

(c) Amending the AFM, as required by this

AD, may be performed by the owner/operator

holding at least a private pilot certificate as

authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.7), and must

be entered into the aircraft records showing

compliance with this AD in accordance with

section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR 43.9).

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an equivalent level of safety may be

approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, 1801

Airport Road, Wichita, Kansas. The request

shall be forwarded through an appropriate

FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add

comments and then send it to the Manager,

Wichita ACO.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Wichita ACO.

(f) Information related to this AD may be

examined at the FAA, Central Region, Office

of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E.

12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.

(g) This amendment (39–10226) becomes

effective on January 21, 1998.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on

November 25, 1997.

Michael Gallagher,

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft

Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 97–31682 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

14 CFR Part 255

[Docket OST–96–1639]

RIN 2105–AC56

Fair Displays of Airline Services in

Computer Reservations Systems

(CRSs)

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary,

Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Department is adopting

two rules to further ensure that travel

agents using computer reservations

systems (CRSs) can obtain a fair and

complete display of airline services.

One rule will require each CRS to offer

one display that lists flights without

giving all on-line connections a

preference over interline connections;

the other rule will bar systems from

creating displays that neither use

elapsed time as a significant factor in

selecting flights from the data base nor

give single-plane flights a preference

over connecting services in ranking

flights. The Department believes that

these rules are necessary to promote

airline competition and ensure that

travel agents and consumers can obtain

a reasonable display of airline services.

The Department is not now adopting