alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries of Chatham Lodging Trust
 State of Incorporation ofName
    
    Organization1.
    
    Chatham Lodging L.P.
    
    Delaware2.
    
    Chatham TRS Holding, Inc.
    
    Florida3.
    
    Chatham TRS Holding II, Inc.
    
    Delaware4.
    
    Chatham Leaseco I, LLC
    
    Florida5.
    
    Chatham Maitland HS LLC
    
    Delaware6.
    
    Chatham Billerica HS LLC
    
    Delaware7.
    
    Chatham Bloomington HS LLC
    
    Delaware8.
    
    Chatham Brentwood HS LLC
    
    Delaware9.
    
    Chatham Dallas HS LLC
    
    Delaware10.
    
    Chatham Farmington HS LLC
    
    Delaware11.
    
    Chatham Houston HAS LLC
    
    Delaware12.
    
    Chatham Houston HAS Leaseco LLC
    
    Delaware13.
    
    Chatham Holtsville RI LLC
    
    Delaware14.
    
    Chatham Holtsville RI Leaseco LLC
    
    Delaware15.
    
    Chatham Holtsville RI Utility LLC
    
    Delaware16.
    
    Chatham Altoona CY LLC
    
    Delaware17.
    
    Chatham Altoona CY Leaseco LLC
    
    Delaware18.
    
    Chatham Wash PA SHS LLC
    
    Delaware19.
    
    Chatham Wash PA SHS Leaseco LLC
    
    Delaware20.
    
    Chatham White Plains RI LLC
    
    Delaware21.
    
    Chatham White Plains RI Leaseco LLC
    
    Delaware22.
    
    Chatham New Rochelle RI LLC
    
    Delaware23.
    
    Chatham New Rochelle RI Leaseco LLC
    
    Delaware24.
    
    Chatham Carlsbad HS LLC
    
    Delaware25.
    
    Chatham Carlsbad HS Leaseco LLC
    
    Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000022301
<NAME> COMCAST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             435
<SECURITIES>                                        39
<RECEIVABLES>                                      622
<ALLOWANCES>                                       119
<INVENTORY>                                        368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,200<F1>
<PP&E>                                           4,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,664)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,678
<BONDS>                                          6,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              534
<PREFERRED>                                         32
<COMMON>                                           369
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,366
<SALES>                                          4,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,036
<CGS>                                              998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (842)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    818<F2>
<INCOME-TAX>                                       309
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                553
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (3)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       550
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
<FN>
<F1>Current assets includes investments available for sale of $1,664.
<F2>Loss before income tax expense and other items excludes the effect of
minority interests, net of tax, of $44.3.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas Lee HILL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-889.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

Thomas Lee Hill, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
----

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: September 28, 2010            |   | /s/ Douglas P. Ahlers                                |
|-------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Douglas P. Ahlers                                    |
|                                |   | Chief Executive Officer and President                |
|                                |   |                                                 |
| Date:  September 28, 2010 |   | /s/ Cheryl J. Leach                                  |
|                                |   | Cheryl J. Leach                                      |
|                                |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Toni TREPAGNIER.

No. 61914.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Toni Trepagnier, applying for writ of review. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.

TATE and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant writ.
p . 1p . 2p . 3
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-91,029-02
EX P ARTE NOLAN RYAN OVERSTREET, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION F OR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. C-396-W012330-0714331-B IN THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT F ROM TARRANT COUNTY
Per curiam . Y E AR

Y , J., f iled a dissenting opinion in w hich KE L L E R, P .J., joined. S L A U G H T E R , J., dissented. O P I N I O N Applicant p led g uilty and was convi c t e d o f failing to reg ister a s a sex offender. He was sentenced to 90 day s’ county jail under Tex as Penal Code 12.44(a). Applicant filed this a pplication for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cle r k f o r w arded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . a rt. 11.07. Applicant filed this subsequent writ in which he contends that h e is actually innocent because he d id not have a duty to reg ister. He states that h e has p reviously unavailable evidence of his actual innocence. Specifically , the Third Court o f Ap p e a l s affirmed the Travis County District Court’s determination that Applicant’s Colorado conviction is not substantially similar to a Tex as offense2

requiring reg i s t

r a t i o n under the Sex Offender Reg istration Act (SORA). See Tex. Dep' t of P ub. Safety
v. Anonymous Adult Montana R e sident, No. 03-20-00565-CV, 2022 Tex
. App. L EXI S 3506, at *7 (Tex
. App.–Austin, May 25, 2022, no pet.). B a sed on the statutes in place at the time of Applicant’s failure to reg ister, the habeas court ag reed with the appellate court’s determination that A p p l i c a n t’s Colorado offense was not substantially similar to a reportable Tex as offense. The court determined that, in lig ht o f the appellate court’s opinion, no reasonable juror could have convicted Applicant. The habeas court concluded that Applicant established by clear and convincing

evidence that he is actually innocent. W e ag ree. Relief is g r anted. Robinson v. State, 466 S.W .3d 166, 170 (Tex
. Crim. App. 2015); Ex parte Harbin, 297 S.W .3d 283, 285 (Tex
. Crim. App. 2009). The judg ment in c a u s e n umber 0714331D in the 396th District Court of Tarrant County is set a side, a nd Applicant is r e manded to the custody of the Sheriff of Tarrant County to answer the charg e s as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any n ecessary bench warrant within ten day s from the d a t e o f t h i s Court’s mandate. C o p ies of this opinion shall be sent to the Tex as Department of Criminal Ju s t i c e
– C o r r e c t i o n a l I nstitutions Division and the B oard of Pardons and Paroles.
Delivered: May

1, 2024 Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 24, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Chase Family No. 2, Ltd., and Thomas G. Chase, Jr. and Helen M. 
Chase, as General Partners, all of Waco, Texas; to acquire voting 
shares of CentraBanc Corporation, Waco, Texas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Central National Bank, Waco, Texas.
    2. Lyndon Lowell Olson, Jr., Waco, Texas; to acquire voting shares 
of CentraBanc Corporation, Waco, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Central National Bank, Waco, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 4, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-29518 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3088]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 961126333-6333-01; I.D. 020397D]


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Pollock in 
Statistical Area 630

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting the directed fishery for pollock in 
Statistical Area 630 in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action is 
necessary to prevent exceeding the interim specification for pollock in 
this area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 1200 hrs, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), February 4, 1997, 
until superseded by the Final 1997 Harvest Specifications for 
groundfish.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Pearson, 907-486-6919.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North 
Pacific Fishery Management Council under authority of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Fishing by U.S. 
vessels is governed by regulations implementing the FMP at subpart H of 
50 CFR 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
    The interim specification of pollock total allowable catch in 
Statistical Area 630 was established by Interim 1997 Harvest 
Specifications (61 FR 64299, December 4, 1996) as 4,875 metric tons 
(mt), determined in accordance with Sec. 679.20(c)(2)(i).
    In accordance with Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(i), the Administrator, Alaska 
Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), has determined that the 1997 
interim specification of pollock in Statistical Area 630 soon will be 
reached. Therefore, the Regional Administrator is establishing a 
directed fishing allowance of 4,675 mt, and is setting aside the 
remaining 200 mt as bycatch to support other anticipated groundfish 
fisheries. In accordance with Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(iii), the Regional 
Administrator finds that this directed fishing allowance will soon be 
reached. Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for pollock 
in Statistical Area 630 until superseded by the Final 1997 Harvest 
Specifications of Groundfish.
    Maximum retainable bycatch amounts for applicable gear types may be 
found in the regulations at Sec. 679.20(e).

Classification

    This action is required by 50 CFR 679.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: February 3, 1997.
Bruce Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-3088 Filed 2-4-97; 3:52 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Donald Lynn Collins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Collins Industries, Inc., certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: | June 9, 2004 |                               
|------ | ------------ | ------------------------------
|       |              |                               
|       | By           |                               
|       |              | /s/ Donald Lynn Collins       
|       |              | Donald Lynn Collins, President
|       |              | and Chief Executive Officer
September 26, 2004 

Excellency: 

 

I have the honor to refer to the Convention signed today 

between the Government of the United States of America and the 

Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for the 

Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal 

Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income. The following 

understandings were reached between our two Governments: 

1. If the United States reaches agreement on the provision 

of a tax sparing credit with any other country, the United 

States agrees to reopen negotiations with Bangladesh with a view 

to the conclusion of a protocol which would extend a tax sparing 

credit under the treaty. 

2. In applying Article 7 (Business Profits) to any case 

where the information available to the tax authorities is 

inadequate to determine the profits to be attributed to such 

permanent establishment, the profits properly attributable to 

the permanent establishment may be determined on a reasonable 

basis applying principles consistent with Article 7. 

If these understandings meet with the approval of the 

Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, this note and 

your reply thereto will indicate that our Governments share 

these understandings. 

Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest 

consideration. 
 

September 26, 2004 

 

Excellency: 

I have the honor to acknowledge receipt of Your 

Excellency’s note of today which reads as follows: 

“I have the honor to refer to the Convention signed today 

between the Government of the United States of America and the 

Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for the 

Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal 

Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income. The following 

understandings were reached between our two Governments: 

1. If the United States reaches agreement on the provision 

of a tax sparing credit with any other country, the United 

States agrees to reopen negotiations with Bangladesh with a view 

to the conclusion of a protocol which would extend a tax sparing 

credit under the treaty. 

2. In applying Article 7 (Business Profits) to any case 

where the information available to the tax authorities is 

inadequate to determine the profits to be attributed to such 

permanent establishment, the profits properly attributable to 

the permanent establishment may be determined on a reasonable 

basis applying principles consistent with Article 7. 

If these understandings meet with the approval of the 

Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, this note and 

your reply thereto will indicate that our Governments share 

these understandings.” 

The foregoing understandings being acceptable to the 

Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, I have the 

honor to confirm that our Governments share these 

understandings. 

I take this opportunity to renew to Your Excellency the 

assurance of my highest consideration.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier: 2011** 

**- NM** 
**- 050** 

**- AD** 

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Order entered September 16, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00820
- CR CESAR ARMIJO, JR., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401
- 80654
- 2014



### O RDER
We GRANT Official Court Reporter Kimberly Tinsley’s September 14, 2015 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ L ANA MYERS JUSTICE
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 198 

To waive certain prohibitions with respect to nationals of Cuba coming to 

the United States to play organized professional baseball. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2021 

Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To waive certain prohibitions with respect to nationals of 

Cuba coming to the United States to play organized 

professional baseball. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baseball Diplomacy 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS. 

7 (a) RESTRICTION ON EMBARGO AUTHORITY.—The 

8 authorities of section 620(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 198 IH

1 of 1961, those authorities under section 5(b) of the Trad2 ing with the Enemy Act that were being exercised with 

3 respect to Cuba on July 1, 1977, as a result of a national 

4 emergency declared before that date, and are being exer5 cised on the date of the enactment of this Act, and the 

6 authorities of section 203 of the International Emergency 

7 Economic Powers Act may not be exercised to regulate 

8 or prohibit— 

9 (1) those transactions permitted under section 

10 515.571 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, by 

11 or on behalf of a Cuban national who enters the 

12 United States from Cuba on a visa issued under sec13 tion 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and 

14 Nationality Act for the purpose of playing organized 

15 professional baseball; and 

16 (2) a Cuban national described in paragraph 

17 (1) from returning to Cuba with the earnings made 

18 in playing organized professional baseball. 

19 (b) RESTRICTION ON IMMIGRATION AUTHORITY.— 

20 The authority contained in section 212(f) of the Immigra21 tion and Nationality Act may not be used to deny a visa 

22 described in subsection (a)(1) to a Cuban national for the 

23 purpose of playing organized professional baseball. 

24 (c) INAPPLICABILITY OF OTHER RESTRICTIONS.— 

25 This section applies notwithstanding section 102(h) of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 198 IH

1 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) 

2 Act of 1996. 

3 SEC. 3. DURATION OF VISA. 

4 A visa described in section 2(a)(1)— 

5 (1) shall permit the alien to whom the visa is 

6 issued to remain in the United States only for the 

7 duration of the baseball season; and 

8 (2) need not be renewed for subsequent entries 

9 into the United States for the duration of a valid 

10 contract entered into between the alien and the pro11 fessional baseball team with which the alien played 

12 in the preceding baseball season. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with SB

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

FDMS Docket No. FAA-::eetOlo - 07()'-I

With whom outside the FAA bas this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Pcrspn Contacted Date

Boeing Helen Biller 12//23/09

ATA Joe White 12/23/09

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master Us! to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use