alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62660-62661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30739]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2651]


The Bureau of Diplomatic Security; 60-Day Notice of Proposed 
Information Collection: Building Access Application.

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.

[[Page 62661]]

    Originating Office: Bureau of Diplomatic Security.
    Title of Information collection: Building Access Application.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: DSP-97.
    Respondents: Press Corps, maintenance personnel, visitors, and 
others as needed.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10,250.
    Average Hours Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 2,550 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Eliza McClenaghan,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30739 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-M
#### CITY OF SUNRISE, Florida (formerly City of Sunrise Golf Village, Florida), a municipal corporation and John Lomelo, Jr., Appellants, v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION and Board of Public Instruction of Broward County, Florida, Appellees.

No. 72-687.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 8, 1973.

Arthur B. Parkhurst of Parkhurst & LaHurd, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Edward Marko of Shaw, Marko, Step-hany & Lyons, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lees.

REED, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in this case on 24 July 1970. A motion to dismiss was filed by the defendants. On 17 February 1972 the motion to dismiss was granted and a final judgment was entered by the trial court dismissing the complaint with prejudice. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed a timely motion for rehearing pursuant to Rule 1.530, RCP, 31 F.S.A. On 18 April 1972 the trial court entered an order on the motion. The order provided:

> “ . . . that the Order and Final Judgment of the Court entered on February 17, 1972, be and the same is hereby vacated and set aside, and Plaintiffs shall have thirty (30) days from the date hereof in which to file an Amended Complaint, failing which Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants.”

Thereafter but within the 30-day period, the plaintiffs filed and served a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule *1.420*(a)(1), RCP, 30 F.S.A. On 9 June 1972, the trial court entered a final judgment against plaintiffs on the ground that plaintiffs failed to file within the 30-day period a further amended complaint. The appeal is from that judgment.

We hold that the final judgment of June 9, 1972 was improperly entered. The order on the motion for rehearing in effect converted the “final judgment” of 17 February *111972 into an order dismissing the amended complaint with 30 days leave to file a second amended complaint. The order on the motion for rehearing, therefore, put the case in the same procedural posture as that considered by the Florida Supreme Court in Hibbard v. State Road Department of Florida, Fla.1969, 225 So.2d 901. There the Florida Supreme Court held that after an order of the trial court had been entered dismissing an amended complaint with leave to file another amended complaint, the plaintiff was entitled, within the time allowed for amending the complaint, to voluntarily dismiss the action by filing and serving a notice of dismissal pursuant to the Rule 1.420(a), RCP. In our opinion, the same result should follow in the present case.

For the foregoing reasons, the final judgment from which this appeal has been taken is vacated and the cause remanded.

CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.
#### Francisco CHURRUCA et al., Appellants, v. MIAMI JAI-ALAI, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 75-838.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 8, 1978.

Heller & Kaplan, Miami, for appellants.

Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proenza & Richman and Ira H. Leesfield, William R. Dawes, Miami, Subin, Shams, Rosenbluth & Moran, Orlando, Joseph M. Murasko, Fern Park, J. Riley Davis, Tallahassee, Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appellees.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on September 14, 1976 (338 So.2d 228) affirming the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause, and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed November 17, 1977, 353 So.2d 547 and mandate now lodged in this court quashed a portion of this court’s judgment,

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on November 2, 1976 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed September 14, 1976 insofar as it is in conflict with or fails to conform to the views expressed in the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida aforesaid is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of' this court, and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court (Rulé 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    Title: Survey of Ocean Freight Revenues and Expenses of United 
States, Carriers--BE-30, Survey of U.S. Airline Operators' Foreign 
Revenues and Expenses--BE-37.
    Form Number(s): BE-30/BE-37.
    OMB Approval Number: 0608-0011
    Type of Request: Extension--regular submission.
    Burden: 800/320.
    Number of Respondents: 40/20.
    Avg Hours Per Response: 5 hours/4 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The Bureau of Economic Analysis is responsible for 
the computation and publication of the U.S. balance of payments 
accounts. The information collected in these surveys are an integral 
part of the ``transportation'' portion of the U.S. balance of payments 
accounts. The balance of payments accounts, which are published 
quarterly in the Bureau's monthly publication, the Survey of Current 
Business, are one of the major statistical products of BEA. The 
accounts provide a statistical summary of U.S. international 
transactions. They are used by government and private organizations for 
national and international policy formulation, and analytical studies. 
Without the information collected in these surveys, an integral 
component of the transportation account would be omitted. No other 
Government agency collects comprehensive quarterly data on U.S. ocean 
carriers' freight revenues and expenses or U.S. airline operators' 
foreign revenues and expenses.
    Affected Public: U.S. ocean and air carriers.
    Frequency: One-time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Section 182.
    OMB Desk Officer: Paul Bugg, (202) 395-3093.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Paul Bugg, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10201, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: November 13, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 97-30343 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-EA-P
Page 41.0

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Checklist Item #41

If the application is being submitted for resubmission review, does the application include:

• a statement that the application is being submitted for resubmission review, and

• the date on which the Treasury Department gave approval to submit an application 

for resubmission review?

See section 8.

This application has not been previously submitted to the Treasury Department for review.
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0001
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0002
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0003
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0004
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0005
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0006
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0007
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0008
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0009
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0010
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0011
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0012
File 2 Ex 2 Certification C&D Status 0013
Exhibit 99.3  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the Trust) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric S. Sprott, Principal Executive Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.  This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.  Date: March 28, 2013   /s/   ERIC S. SPROTTEric   S. SprottPrincipal   Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned officers of Cone Mills Corporation ("Cone"), does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 29, 2003, of
Cone fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and  information  contained  in the Form  10-Q
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Cone.

Dated: August 13, 2003              /s/ John L. Bakane
                                    Name: John L. Bakane
                                    Title: Chairman, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer



Dated: August 13, 2003              /s/ Gary L. Smith
                                    Name: Gary L. Smith
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
Notes from Site Visit to Walmart

Attended by:

Walmart Staff: Mike Stephenson and others

RILA Staff: Ben Hobbs, Kelly Cole, Adam Siegel

Others: staff from Advance Auto and Lowe’s

EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald, Jessica Young, Jamie Piziali, Richard Huggins, Tiffany 

Kollar, Priscilla Halloran, Dave Nicholas, Jim O’Leary

Date: January 18, 2012

EPA staff toured a Walmart store and pharmacy in Virginia. 

Non-pharmacy: Walmart uses color-coded bins to segregate their waste streams. They use a 

third party information system to aid in their hazardous waste determinations.

Pharmacy: Walmart uses color-coded bins to segregate their waste streams. They use a third 

party for reverse distribution of its pharmaceuticals. The largest bottle we observed stocked in 

the pharmacy contained 500 pills.
Exhibit 32.3.2

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Edward J. Rasmussen, the Chief Financial Officer of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (the "Company") certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  | /s/EDWARD J. RASMUSSENEdward J. Rasmussen
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2003 |  |                                          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
**Confirmation of Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return Data**

**in connection with the**

**Coronavirus Economic Relief for Transportation Services (CERTS) Act**

To be completed by Payroll Service Providers (PSP), Certified Professional Employer Organizations (CPEO), and other authorized agents.

To the U.S. Department of the Treasury:  

I am an authorized representative of the following company:

**Name of PSP / CPEO / Agent**:  

My company acts as a third party to file IRS Form 941 data for the following CERTS applicant:

**Name of Company**:  

**TIN of Company**:  

For Q1 2020, the CERTS applicant identified above reported to the IRS the following number of employees and total wages, tips, and other compensation:

**Number of Employees**: 

**Wages, Tips, and Other Compensation**:  

Sincerely,

Signature:  __________________________________

Name:  

Title:

Date:
ERA1 Voluntary Reallocation

Voluntary Reallocation to Designated Entities

Transferring Entity (Transferor) Receiving Entity (Transferee) Amount to be Reallocated

State of Arizona City of Chandler $7,000,000.00

State of Arizona City of Glendale $7,000,000.00

State of Arizona Maricopa County $39,000,000.00

State of Arizona City of Mesa $13,000,000.00

State of Arizona Pima County $11,000,000.00

State of Arizona City of Tucson $11,000,000.00

State of Arkansas   Benton County $20,000,000.00

State of Arkansas Washington County $3,000,000.00

Stanislaus County, CA   State of California $6,559,364.19

Merced County, CA State of California $5,035,908.00

State of Georgia Fulton County $25,000,000.00

State of Georgia DeKalb County $25,000,000.00

State of Georgia Henry County $15,000,000.00

State of Georgia Hall County $6,600,000.00

State of Georgia Clayton County $9,000,000.00

State of Indiana City of Ft. Wayne $12,900,000.00

State of Indiana City of Indianapolis/ Marion County $91,454,708.00

State of Indiana Lake County $25,000,000.00

State of Indiana St. Joseph County $3,300,000.00

State of Iowa Polk County   $30,000,000.00

State of Louisiana Caddo Parish $4,423,024.15

State of Louisiana City of New Orleans $37,198,688.19

State of Louisiana East Baton Rouge Parish/City of Baton Rouge $33,339,185.74

State of Louisiana Jefferson Parish $22,325,478.06

State of Louisiana Lafayette Parish $8,817,622.05

State of Nebraska    City of Omaha $50,000,000.00

State of Nebraska    City of Lincoln $30,000,000.00

State of Nebraska    Douglas County $3,300,000.00

State of Nebraska    Lancaster County $1,400,000.00

State of South Carolina Richland County $22,000,000.00

State of South Carolina Charleston County $10,000,000.00

State of Tennessee City of Memphis $28,735,586.76

State of Tennessee Davidson County $30,636,556.92

State of Tennessee Knox County $20,757,611.16
State of Tennessee Shelby County $12,626,925.12

State of Tennessee Rutherford County $12,221,000.00

State of Utah Salt Lake City $3,000,000.00

State of Utah Davis County $4,000,000.00

State of Utah Salt Lake County $10,000,000.00

State of Wisconsin Dane County $10,224,183.00

State of Wisconsin Brown County $7,000,000.00

State of Wisconsin City of Madison $35,000,000.00

State of Wisconsin City of Milwaukee $61,000,000.00

State of Wisconsin Milwaukee County $50,000,000.00

State of Wyoming Northern Arapaho Tribe $1,000,000.00

Total $874,855,841.34
ERA1 Voluntary Reallocation

Voluntary Reallocation to General Pool

Transferring Entity (Transferor) Receiving Entity (Transferee) Amount to be Reallocated

Okaloosa County, FL Treasury ‐ General Reallocation Pool $5,819,715.02

State of North Dakota Treasury ‐ General Reallocation Pool $149,000,000.00

Montgomery County, TX Treasury ‐ General Reallocation Pool $7,106,368.27

Total $161,926,083.29
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations as reported in the form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                    35,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     47,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,863
<PP&E>                                          77,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,017
<BONDS>                                         90,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,587
<SALES>                                        200,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,641
<CGS>                                          135,552
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,550
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
        

</TABLE>
stal_ex102.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2

 

Kok Chee LEE

11-3- G Tkt Paya Terubung

11060 Paya Terubung

Pulau Pinang


	
Malaysia
	
 
	
January 17, 2018




 

Star Alliance International Corp

Penthouse 1-21-1, Suntech Penang Cybercity,

Lintang Mayang Pasir 3, Bayan Baru, 11950 Penang, 

Malaysia

 

Dear Board of Directors, 

 

I would like to inform you that I am resigning from my position as the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Star Alliance International Corp with immediate effect. Thank you for the opportunities you have provided me during my time with the company.

 

If I can be of any help after my resignation, please let me know.

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

/s/Kok Chee LEE

Kok Chee LEE
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

**HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.**

 

I,Perry A. Glassgow, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary ofHarley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:

 

(i) areview of HDCC’s activities for the period from December 10, 2009 (the closing date of theHarley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2009-4 transaction subject to the requirementsof Regulation AB) through December 31, 2009 (the “Reporting Period”) andof HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2009 (the “Sale andServicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2009-4,Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and The Bank of New York TrustCompany, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and

 

(ii) tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in allmaterial respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate in the nameof and behalf of HDCC this 25th day of March 2010.

 
|   |   |                                               |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Perry A. Glassgow                              |
|   |   | Perry A. Glassgow                                  |
|   |   | Vice President,  Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|   |   |                                               |
|   |   | Harley-Davidson Credit  Corp.                      |

 

----