alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Information found at http://www.epa.gov!airexplorer! 

utah Statewide NAAQS Summary 

Year 

PM2.5 

Exceedance Days 

PMIO 

Exceedance Days 

Ozone 

Exceedance Days 

N02 Exceedance 

Days 

S02 Exceedance 

Days 

8-hourCO 

Exceedance Days 

I-hour CO 

Exceedance Days 

Pb Exceedance 

Days 

2005 56 1 30 0 2 2 0 0 

2006 14 2 28 1 0 0 0 Not Monitored 

2007 28 4 31 1 1 1 1 Not Monitored 

2008 21 4 13 0 3 0 0 Not Monitored 

2009 33 2 8 1 3 0 0 Not Monitored 

2010 19 2 44 1 0 0 0 Not Monitored 

Utah Statewide Flagged Exceedance Summary 

Year 

PM2.5 Flagged 

Exceedance Days 

PM10 Flagged 

Exceedance Days 

Ozone 

Exceedance Days 

N02 Flagged 

Exceedance Days 

S02 Flagged 

Exceedance Days 

B-hourCO 

Flagged 

Exceedance Days 

I-hour CO Flagged 

Exceedance Days 

Pb Flagged 

Exceedance Days 

2005 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 

2006 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 Not Monitored 

2007 4 3 9 0 0 0 0 Not Monitored 

2008 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 Not Monitored 

2009 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 Not Monitored 

2010 4 2 0 0 a 0 0 Not Monitored
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of Hearings 

Washington, D.C. 

Regent Aerospace Corporation 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP*not yet assigned* 

(EIR 2010-GL-11-0030) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP*not yet assigned* 

(EIR 2011-GL-11-0026) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

Agency Position on Venue 

RECEIVED 

APR 1 7 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

These cases involve a Part 145 Repair Station located in Plainfield, Indiana, a suburb of 

Indianapolis. The Repair Station Certificate is held and managed by the Indianapolis Flight 

Standards District Office which is also located in Plainfield, Indiana. The events giving rise to 

EIR 201 0-GL-11-0030 occurred in Plainfield, Indiana, and although the facility where the facts 

alleged in EIR 2011-GL-11-0026 occurred was in Mobile, Alabama, the Mobile facility 

functioned as a "work away" from the Respondent's Plainfield, Indiana facility. 

The Agency urges the Assigned Administrative Law Judge to set the hearing for these matters in 

Indianapolis, Indiana, or better yet, Plainfield, Indiana. The principle place of business for the 

Part 145 Certificate is located there, the Certificate Holding District Office is there, and the 

witnesses are in the area. The only connection this case has with Chicago, Illinois is the offices 

of the attorneys for the Respondent and the Agency. 
2 

Therefore, the Agency Attorney urges the Assigned Administrative Law Judge to set the hearing 

for these matters in Plainfield or Indianapolis, Indiana. 

Respectfully submitted this 11th day of April2014. 

(/).q s 

&is 

Senior 

G. 

Attorney 

Zurales, A~ Federal Aviation Administration 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Phone: (847) 294-7713 

Fax: (847) 294-7498 

Email: chris.g.=ales@faa.gov 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency Position on Venue, has been mailed this 11th day of 

April2014, by First Class Mail, to: 

Original and One Copy: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilber Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

One Copy to each: 

The Honorable Richard C Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Telephone (Staff Assistant): 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Mr. John Scott Hoff 

Jeffrey F Clement 

Hoff Law Group 

135 S LaSalle St, Suite 3300 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Telephone: 

Fax: 

(312)346-8111 

(312) 853-3924 

Dated this 111

h day of April2014 . 

. 

FAA Great Lakes Region 

3
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.(the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: May 2, 2008
Demonstration that Limits on Individual Suspensions Are Satisfied

Pursuant to IRC Sections 432(e)(9)(D)(i) through (iii)

Proposed Benefit Suspension

A. Benefit prior to Suspension: $2,000.00

B. Benefit after Suspension (A x (1-100%), prior to statutory limit: $0.00

C. Cut without limits (A - B):........................................................................ $2,000.00

Limitations

1. 110% of PBGC Maximum Guarantee Limit

D. Credited Service: 20.00

E. Plan accrual rate (A / D): $100.00

F. PBGC maximum benefit guarantee accrual rate: $35.75

(100% of first $11 plus 75% of next $33 of E)

G. PBGC maximum benefit guarantee (D x F): $715.00

H. Benefit to 110% of PBGC maximum (G x 110%): $786.50

I. 110% limitation (A - H):..................................................................$1,213.50

2. Disability Limit

J. Benefit attributable to disability: $0.00

K. Disability limit (A - J): $2,000.00

L. Cut with limits 1& 2 (min C, I, K):........................................................................ $1,213.50

3. Age limit

M. Effective Date of Suspension: 04/01/2017

N. The month after the effective date: May-2017

O. Date of Birth: 08/01/1940

P. The month the Participant turns 80: Aug-2020

Q. Months in the period from N to P (months away from age 80): 40

R. "Applicable Percentage" 67%

[for Age-based limitation: proration factor (Q/60, not<0 or >1)]

S. Cut with all limits (incl. Age based limit, L x R):.................................... $809.00

T. Benefit after Suspension, with limitations (A - S):...................................................... $1,191.00

Z:\009 5\p\Misc Corr\2016\Suspension\Application\Attachments\Sample limitation calcs 5 15 xlsx
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 13, 2019

p0911 

# Order

Clerk September 13, 2019

155638

In re R. E. McLAUGHLIN, Minor. SC: 155638

COA: 332170

Oakland CC Family Division:

2015

- 833596

- NA

_______________________________________/

By order of July 5, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2017

judgment of the Cour t of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in In re

Ferranti

, Minor (Docket Nos. 157907

- 8). On order of the Court, the case having been

decided on June 12, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered, and

it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be

reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 32.1.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the“Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: May 1, 2009
Version 1 9/25/2023

1

The following guide is intended to aid users to access and submit the Impact Highlight Report to

Treasury through the ECIP Investment Monitoring Portal and Compliance Tracker (IMPACT). It is

not the instructions for completing the substance of the report. Full instructions can be found on 

the Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) webpage by clicking here. Contact the ECIP

Teamwith any questions or concerns at ecip@treasury.gov.

Table of Contents

Getting Started ............................................................................................................................. 1

Accessing and Completing the Report......................................................................................... 3

Getting Started

1. Start on the homepage of the CARES portal: https://portal.treasury.gov/CARES.

a. You will be required to log in using ID.me.

b. If you do not have an Id.me account please read detailed instructions on how to

register with ID.me.

2. When you first log in to the portal, read and then dismiss the warning that pops up.

-continued on next pageU.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Emergency Capital Investment Program

User Guide for Submission of the I m p a c t Hi g h li g h t R e p o r t
Version 1 9/25/2023

2

3. After you dismiss the warning, you will be taken to Treasury COVID-19 Relief Hub's

Welcome banner. Scroll down and the top right card in the Program areas section

should show “Emergency Capital Investment”. Click on the card to go to the ECIP

landing page.
Version 1 9/25/2023

3

Accessing and Completing the Report

4. You are now in the ECIP IMPACT system. From the ECIP landing page, to get to the 

Impact Highlight form, click on the Supplemental Reporting tab on the left side of 

landing page.

5. Upon landing on the next screen, select the EC-XXXX number for which you want 

to create the report (most users will only have one option) and click “Create 

New”. 
Version 1 9/25/2023

4

6. A new report will be generated and listed on the table of reports. The report will

initially show as being in “incomplete” status. Click on the Link to the report you

would like to complete under the “ECIP Voluntary Highlight Name Column”.

7. Complete all the required fields and select “Submit” to complete the process or

“Save for Later” if you are not ready to submit.

8. The table of reports for submitted reported will now show the report as

“Complete”. Contact ECIP if you need to make edits after submission. The

number of reports is not limited.

Contact the ECIP Team with any questions or concerns at ecip@treasury.gov.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

O ctober 7, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00158

- CR

Clarence Edward LIPPERT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court

, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7076 Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State’s appellee’s brief is due October 10, 2022. On October 5 , 2022, the S t ate filed a motion requesting a sixty

- day ex tension of time.

The motion is GRANTED and the State is ORDERED to file its brief no later than

December 9 , 2022. Further requests for an extension of time will not be granted absent extraordinary circumstances

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of October, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 11 CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Earnings Per Share
(in thousands, except per share data) Three months ended
    
    Nine months endedSeptember 30,
    
    September 30,2004
    
    2003
    
    2004
    
    2003Computation of share totals used in computing earnings per
share:Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    18,877
    
    
    
    18,765
    
    
    
    18,862
    
    
    
    18,740Incremental shares arising from outstanding stock options
    
    
    177
    
    
    
    88
    
    
    
    148
    
    
    
    51Total weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding
    
    
    19,054
    
    
    
    18,853
    
    
    
    19,010
    
    
    
    18,791Income from continuing operations
    
    $
    2,471
    
    
    $
    3,149
    
    
    $
    10,072
    
    
    $
    16,413Loss from discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (424
    )Net income
    
    $
    2,471
    
    
    $
    3,149
    
    
    $
    10,072
    
    
    $
    15,989Net income for common stock
    
    $
    2,466
    
    
    $
    3,144
    
    
    $
    10,057
    
    
    $
    15,974Basic earnings (loss) per share:Continuing operations
    
    $
    0.13
    
    
    $
    0.17
    
    
    $
    0.53
    
    
    $
    0.88Discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (0.02
    )Net income for common stock
    
    
    0.13
    
    
    
    0.17
    
    
    
    0.53
    
    
    
    0.85Diluted earnings (loss) per share:Continuing operations
    
    $
    0.13
    
    
    $
    0.17
    
    
    $
    0.53
    
    
    $
    0.87Discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (0.02
    )Net income for common stock
    
    
    0.13
    
    
    
    0.17
    
    
    
    0.53
    
    
    
    0.85
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO18
      U.S.C.  SECTION 1350AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Progreen Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan
Telander, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.





/s/
      Jan TelanderJan
      Telander, President, Chief Executive Officerand
      Principal Financial Officer





September
      14, 2009
EXHIBIT 11

                            CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       Computation of Earnings Per Share



                                              Years Ended 
                                       --------------------------
                                       June 30          June 30             
                                         1997             1996   
                                       ----------    ------------
Computation of share totals
 used in computing earnings
 per share:

Weighted average number of
 shares outstanding                   1,487,882        1,484,523
(Adjusted for stock dividend
 May 3, 1996)

Primary average shares

 a - Outstanding                      1,487,882        1,484,823

Incremental shares arising
 from outstanding stock options          17,846           12,861
                                      -----------      ----------            
 b - Totals                           1,505,728        1,497,384      
                                      ===========      ==========


 c - Net Income                      $5,679,361       $5,373,657      
                                      ===========      =========


Net Income Per Share
 Primary - c/a                         $3.82            $3.62         
                                       ==========       =========


Net Income Per Share
assuming full dilution - c/b           $3.77            $3.59           
                                       ==========       ==========
Order filed May 15, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00900-CR

____________

LAKENDRICK EARL JACOBS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1289471

ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Patrick F. McCann. 

Appellant’s brief was originally due January 3, 2014. Three extensions of time 

have been granted. On May 5, 2014, counsel filed a further request for extension 

of time to file appellant’s brief. To date, counsel has submitted no brief. We deny 

the request and issue the following order.
Accordingly, we order Patrick F. McCann to file a brief with the clerk of 

this Court within thirty days of the date of this order. If Patrick F. McCann does 

not timely file the brief as ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial 

court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the brief. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b).

PER CURIAM
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1921 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1921 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN RESTORATION 

2 PROGRAM REAUTHORIZATION. 

3 (a) REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT

4 PLAN.—Section 121 of the Federal Water Pollution Con5 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1273) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (c)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

8 and inserting a semicolon; 

9 (B) in paragraph (6), by striking the pe10 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(7) ensure that the comprehensive conserva13 tion and management plan approved for the Basin 

14 under section 320 is reviewed and revised in accord15 ance with section 320 not less often than once every 

16 5 years, beginning on the date of enactment of this 

17 paragraph.’’; and 

18 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘recommended 

19 by a management conference convened for the Basin 

20 under section 320’’ and inserting ‘‘identified in the 

21 comprehensive conservation and management plan 

22 approved for the Basin under section 320’’. 

23 (b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 121(e)(1) of the Federal 

24 Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273(e)(1)) is 

25 amended by striking ‘‘, a 5,000 square mile’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1921 RFS

1 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

2 121(f) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 

3 U.S.C. 1273(f)) is amended— 

4 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2001 

5 through 2012 and the amount appropriated for fis6 cal year 2009 for each of fiscal years 2013 through 

7 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘2022 through 2026’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(3) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—The Ad10 ministrator may use for administrative expenses not 

11 more than 5 percent of the amounts appropriated to 

12 carry out this section.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1954 

To amend the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control 

Act of 1998 to clarify that during a lapse in appropriations certain 

services relating to the Harmful Algal Bloom Operational Forecasting 

System are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency Act, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2021 

Mr. DONALDS (for himself, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. POSEY, Mr. GONZALEZ of Ohio, Mr. CRIST, and Mr. STEUBE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research 

and Control Act of 1998 to clarify that during a lapse 

in appropriations certain services relating to the Harmful 

Algal Bloom Operational Forecasting System are excepted services under the Anti-Deficiency Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1954 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Harmful Algal Bloom 

3 Essential Forecasting Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATING CERTAIN HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM 

5 SERVICES AS EXCEPTED SERVICES UNDER 

6 THE ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 603A of the Harmful 

8 Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act of 

9 1998 is amended by adding at the end the following sub10 section: 

11 ‘‘(j) ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT APPLIED TO HARMFUL

12 ALGAL BLOOM SERVICES.—Any services by an officer or 

13 employee under this chapter relating to web services and 

14 server processing for the Harmful Algal Bloom Oper15 ational Forecast System of the National Centers for 

16 Coastal Ocean Science and the National Oceanic and At17 mospheric Administration shall be deemed, for purposes 

18 of section 1342 of title 31, United States Code, services 

19 for emergencies involving the safety of human life or the 

20 protection of property.’’. 

21 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub22 section (a) shall apply to any lapse in appropriations be23 ginning on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Rev. 03-01-13

Unemployment Bridge Program

The Kentucky Unemployment Bridge Program (UBP) is a new loan option 

for eligible homeowners to assist them in making their mortgage payments.

• To be eligible, the 

homeowner must have 

experienced a job loss or 

reduction in income due 

to changing economic 

conditions, through 

no fault of their own, and 

demonstrates a need for 

assistance. 

• The employment or incomerelated event must have 

occurred within the three (3) 

year period prior to the date 

of application.

• The maximum amount of 

assistance is $30,000 or 18 months, whichever occurs first. 

• Of the $30,000, the maximum amount that may be used for 

reinstatement– all related fees and payments to bring the loan(s) 

current – is $12,500. 

Other qualifications apply. There is no charge for this service. To get started, contact the 

Homeownership Protection Center today!

ProtectMyKyHom

U

Y

The Kentucky Homeownership 

Protection Center provides 

a centralized location for 

information on public services 

to assist Kentuckians in keeping 

their homes.

If homeowners are currently 

delinquent on their home loan, in 

danger of becoming delinquent, 

or are just starting to have 

financial problems that may affect 

their ability to pay their mortgage, 

options are available. 

ProtectMyKyHome.org

UNEMPLOYED?

(866) 830-7868

WE CAN PAY

YOUR MORTGAGE.

• • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • ••

• • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • •

       

SM

UN

WE CAN PAY

YOUR MORTGAGE.