alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5881-5882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3106]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[STB Docket No. AB-290 (Sub-No. 183X)]


Norfolk Southern Railway Company--Abandonment Exemption--in 
Greenwood and Newberry Counties, SC

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempts Norfolk 
Southern Railway Company (NS) from the prior approval requirements of 
49 U.S.C. 10903 to permit NS to abandon a 13-mile line of railroad 
between milepost V-58.0, at Conrad, and milepost V-71.0, at Brickdale, 
in Greenwood and Newberry Counties, SC, subject to an environmental 
condition and standard employee protective conditions.

DATES: Provided no formal expression of intent to file an offer of 
financial assistance (OFA) has been received, this exemption will be 
effective on March 9, 1997. Formal expressions of intent to file an OFA 
under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2) <SUP>1 and requests for issuance of a notice 
of interim trail use/rail banking under 49 CFR 1152.29 must be filed by 
February 18, 1997, petitions to stay must be filed by February 24, 
1997, requests for a public use condition conforming to 49 CFR 
1152.28(a)(2) must be filed by February 27, 1997, and petitions to 
reopen must be filed by March 4, 1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment--Offers of Finan. Assist., 4 
I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to STB Docket No. AB-290 (Sub-No. 
183X) to: (1) Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, 
Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20423; and (2) James R. Paschall, Three Commercial Place, Norfolk, VA 
23510-2191.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5660. [TDD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC Data & News, Inc., Room 2229, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-
4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through 
TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: January 30, 1997.


[[Page 5882]]


    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3106 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31564]



[[Page 63696]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


United States Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas, and 
Lentils

AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) 
is revising the voluntary United States Standards for Whole Dry Peas, 
Split Peas, and Lentils by eliminating the classes Persian and Mixed 
lentils and establishing a new class, Miscellaneous peas, and a new 
grading factor for lentils, Inconspicuous Admixture. GIPSA is changing 
these standards to facilitate the marketing of peas and lentils.
    Section 203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as 
amended, directs and authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture ``to 
develop and improve standards of quality, condition, quantity, grade, 
and packaging and recommend and demonstrate such standards in order to 
encourage uniformity and consistency in commercial practices. . . .'' 
The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) is 
committed to carrying out this authority in a manner that facilitates 
the marketing of agricultural commodities and makes copies of official 
standards available upon request.
    The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) 
published a notice in the Federal Register on August 15, 1997 (62 FR 
43695), that it was proposing to eliminate the classes Persian and 
Mixed lentils, and to establish a new class, Miscellaneous peas, and a 
new grading factor for lentils, Inconspicuous Admixture.
    GIPSA received no comments in response to that notice.
    Since these changes to the standards were recommended and reviewed 
by the affected trade and are consistent with current practices in the 
trade, they will become effective on August 1, 1998, the beginning of 
the next marketing season.
    The United States Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas, and 
Lentils do not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations but are 
maintained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The revised United 
States Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas, and Lentils are 
available either by accessing GIPSA's Home Page on the Internet at: 
www.usda.gov/gipsa/strulreg/standard/beans or by contacting the 
Audiovisual, Regulatory and Training Staff, GIPSA, USDA, STOP 3649, 
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3649; telephone 
(202) 720-1734; FAX (202) 720-4628.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
James R. Baker,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-31564 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Samuel M. Inman, III, Chief Executive Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: December 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Samuel M. Inman, III
|                        |  |  |  | Samuel M. Inman, III    
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the Company), certify that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2004 and for the period then ended.





|/s/ Thos E. CappsThos. E. Capps
Chief Executive Officer
November 3, 2004
|------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Thomas N. ChewningThomas N. Chewning
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer 
November 3, 2004
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Agenda times are approximate and subject to change depending upon the discussion.

US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

HUMAN STUDIES REVIEW BOARD

NOVEMBER 2014 PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

Internet Virtual Meeting

https://epa.connectsolutions.com/hsrb

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

HSRB WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/

Docket Telephone: (202) 566 1752

Docket Number: EPA–HQ–ORD–2015–0750

10:00 AM* Convene Public Meeting – Jim Downing, Designated Federal Officer, EPA 

Human Studies Review Board, Office of the Science Advisor

Conference Call operations –Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH, HSRB Chair

Introduction of Board Members –Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH, HSRB Chair

Opening Remarks – Toby Schonfeld, Ph.D., Human Subjects Research Review 

Official, EPA

Session 1: A new scenario design and associated protocol from the Agricultural Handler 

Exposure Task Force, LLC describing proposed research to monitor dermal and 

inhalation exposure of pesticide handlers who manually open containers of granular 

pesticide products and perform open pour loading of the granules into application 

equipment.

10:15 AM EPA Science Review Highlights – Jeff Evans (OPP, EPA)

10:25 AM Board Questions of Clarification – Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH (HSRB Chair),

EPA staff

10:40 AM EPA Ethics Review Highlights - Ms. Kelly Sherman (OPP, EPA)

10:50 AM Board Questions of Clarification – Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH (HSRB Chair), 

EPA staff

11:05 AM Public Comments 

11:10 AM Board Discussion 

Charge to the Board - Science:

 Is this study scientifically sound, providing reliable data?

 If so, is this study relevant for quantitative use in support of a risk assessment of 

exposures to agricultural workers applying pesticides?

Charge to the Board - Ethics:

 Does the study meet the applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 26 subpart Q?
*Agenda times are approximate and subject to change depending upon the discussion.

12:00 PM Lunch

12:55 PM Reconvene – roll call

Session 2: A published report by Frampton et al. (2002) of an intentional exposure human 

study measuring the effects of nitrogen dioxide exposure on airway and blood cells.

1:00 PM EPA Science Review Highlights – LT Jonathan Leshin, Ph.D. (OPP, EPA)

1:10 PM Board Questions of Clarification – Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH (HSRB Chair), 

EPA staff

1:25 PM EPA Ethics Review Highlights - Ms. Kelly Sherman (OPP, EPA)

1:35 PM Board Questions of Clarification – Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH (HSRB Chair), 

and EPA staff

1:50 PM Public Comments 

1:55 PM Board Discussion

Charge to the Board - Science:

 Is this study scientifically sound, providing reliable data?

 If so, is this study relevant for quantitative use in support of an assessment measuring the 

effects of nitrogen dioxide exposure on airway and blood cells?

Charge to the Board - Ethics:

 Does the study meet the applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 26 subpart Q?

2:50 PM* Adjourn
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 6, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00387

- CV

T. D. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 5 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the decree t e r minating appellant ’ s parental rights to S am and L eon
, signed

by the tr i a l court on July 23, 2021

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the

C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the decree

. Therefore, the C ourt a ffirms the

trial court’s termination decree

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Technology Applications International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles J. Scimeca, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ *Charles J. Scimeca*

By: Charles J. Scimeca

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Dated: April 15, 2014

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register: September 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 184)]
[Notices]               
[Page 58013]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23se10-117]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Application of Dynamic Airways, LLC d/b/a Dynamic Aviation for 
Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2010-9-17); Docket DOT-
OST-2010-0058.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Dynamic 
Airways, LLC d/b/a Dynamic Aviation, fit, willing, and able, and 
awarding it a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage 
in interstate charter air transportation of persons, property and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
October 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2010-0058 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, 
and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the 
order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott A. Faulk, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room W86-487), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

    Dated: September 17, 2010.
Susan L. Kurland,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-23787 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of China Modern Agricultural Information, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), I, Wang Youliang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 8, 2013
By:
/s/ Wang YouliangWang YouliangChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1972 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list of diseases associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents for which there is a 

presumption of service connection for veterans who served in the Republic 

of Vietnam to include hypertension, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2021 

Mr. HARDER of California (for himself and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list 

of diseases associated with exposure to certain herbicide 

agents for which there is a presumption of service connection for veterans who served in the Republic of Vietnam to include hypertension, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Care for Vietnam 

5 Veterans Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1972 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF ADDITIONAL DISEASES ASSOCIATED 

2 WITH EXPOSURE TO CERTAIN HERBICIDE 

3 AGENTS FOR WHICH THERE IS A PRESUMP4 TION OF SERVICE CONNECTION FOR VET5 ERANS WHO SERVED IN THE REPUBLIC OF 

6 VIETNAM. 

7 Section 1116(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

8 as amended by the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National 

9 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public 

10 Law 116–283), is amended by adding at the end the fol11 lowing new subparagraphs: 

12 ‘‘(L) Hypertension. 

13 ‘‘(M) Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined 

14 significance.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10085 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

BRIAN KELLEY , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 359

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brian Kelley has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Kelley has filed a response. The recor d is not sufficiently developed
to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Kelley ’s claims of ine ffective assistance

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 18 , 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10085 Document: 00513722068 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016No. 16

- 10085

2 of counsel; we theref ore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to
collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Kelley ’s response. We concur with counsel’s

assess ment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 16-10085 Document: 00513722068 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
#### Anthony F. BALZEBRE et al., Appellants, v. 2600 DOUGLAS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-1125.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 12, 1974.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1974.

Edward C. Vming, Jr., and R. M. MacArthur, Miami, for appellants.

Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is brought by the counterdefendants from an order which denied their motion to strike or dismiss the amended counterclaim of the counterplain-tiff-appellee and denied objections to interrogatories which had been interposed by the appellee. This cause has had several previous appearances in this court. See Balzebre v. Pearson, Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 427; Balzebre v. 2600 Douglas, Inc., Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 445; Balzebre v. Pearson, Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 429.

*33Appellants have presented two points on appeal corresponding to the two aspects of the order mentioned above. We hold that neither point presents prejudicial error.

In appellants’ argument under the first point, it is claimed that punitive damages are not allowable in this suit because this suit was one formerly cognizable in equity. It is clear that while the suit was originally brought by the appellants as an equity suit, the appellee’s counterclaim is for an alleged malicious tort and as such punitive damages are allowable. We do not reach the sufficiency of the allegations as to punitive damages since appellants assign as error only the denial of the general motion to dismiss or strike the entire counterclaim. See Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Sellers, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 251.

We find no error upon the discovery ruling. See Lewis v. Moody, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 260.

Affirmed.