alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2142 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2142

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 170 Manhattan Avenue in Buffalo, New York, as the ``Indiana Hunt-
                     Martin Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2021

 Mr. Higgins of New York (for himself, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. 
Suozzi, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. 
  Jeffries, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Malliotakis, Mrs. 
 Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. 
Torres of New York, Mr. Bowman, Mr. Jones, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of 
 New York, Mr. Delgado, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Tenney, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Reed, 
   Mr. Katko, Mr. Morelle, Mr. Jacobs of New York, and Ms. Moore of 
  Wisconsin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 170 Manhattan Avenue in Buffalo, New York, as the ``Indiana Hunt-
                     Martin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDIANA HUNT-MARTIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 170 Manhattan Avenue in Buffalo, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Indiana Hunt-Martin Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Indiana 
Hunt-Martin Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK LHERISON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 603 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000741612
<NAME> TNP ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      936,079
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,525
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          57,928
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        28,480
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,024,012
<COMMON>                                       136,383
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             97,525
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 233,908
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           491,399
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  101,907
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 193,198
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,024,012
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      379,300
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            12,788
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     292,162
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     304,950
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         74,350
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 262
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  74,612
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        51,927
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,685
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        126
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   22,559
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         7,518
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       49,380
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          40,745
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.05
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,684
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,240)
<INVENTORY>                                     16,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,678
<PP&E>                                         744,021
<DEPRECIATION>                               (313,195)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 638,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,370
<BONDS>                                        121,651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,349
<OTHER-SE>                                     317,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   638,190
<SALES>                                        336,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               345,399
<CGS>                                          286,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  316,841
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,113
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,749
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,112
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
#### Leonard ANTHONY, Petitioner, v. E. Charles GENTER, d/b/a Results Detective Agency et al., Respondents.

No. 70-880.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 2, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022198
<NAME> COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,942,167
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    115,406
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         398,713
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        55,372
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 339,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,851,626
<COMMON>                                        41,026
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      572,968
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            249,872
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 863,866
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           922,690
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  39,475
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     32,519
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 7,337
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 960,739
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,851,626
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      298,306
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            17,726
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     236,456
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     254,182
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         44,124
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,684
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  45,808
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        18,337
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,471
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        533
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   26,938
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        23,650
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       10,375
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          61,124
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33411]


Pacific Harbor Line, Inc.--Operation Exemption--Port of Los 
Angeles

    Pacific Harbor Line, Inc. (PHL), a noncarrier, has filed a verified 
notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire operating rights 
from the City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, acting through 
its Board of Harbor Commissioners (LA). PHL will acquire the right to 
operate within LA's Port of Los Angeles (POLA) to provide switching 
services on track owned by POLA.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Pursuant to the terms of an operating agreement, PHL's 
operating rights will be for a term of three years, subject to 
extension, modification, and earlier termination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was expected to be consummated in phases on or 
after November 15, 1997.
    This transaction is related to STB Finance Docket No. 33412, Peter 
A. Gilbertson, H. Terry Hearst, Bruce A. Lieberman, R. Lawrence 
McCaffrey, Jr., Harold F. Parmly, and Anacostia Rail Holdings--
Continuance in Control Exemption--Pacific Harbor Line, Inc., in which 
Peter A. Gilbertson, H. Terry Hearst, Bruce Lieberman, R. Lawrence 
McCaffrey, Jr., Harold F. Parmly and Anacostia Rail Holdings Company 
have filed a notice of exemption to continue in control of PHL upon its 
becoming a Class III rail carrier.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33411, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Mark H. Sidman, Esq., Weiner, Brodsky, Sidman & Kider, P.C., 
1350 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005-4797.

    Decided: November 24, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31558 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31652]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-136-008]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Refund Report

November 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 21, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing a report of refunds made to customers on 
November 6 and 11, 1997.
    WNG states that pursuant to Commission order issued October 22, 
1997, in Docket No. RP95-136-007, it is filing a report of additional 
refunds to KMGA and City Utilities of Springfield, including applicable 
interest through November 6, 1997. In addition to amounts withheld for 
past due PODB penalties in Docket No. RP95-136, WNG states that it also 
refunded to KMGA amounts WNG had withheld for past due PODB penalty 
amounts from the GRI refund made August 22, 1996, in Docket No. RP96-
143.
    On November 11, 1997, WNG states that it also made refunds to 
certain other customers whose refund in RP95-136 was offset by past due 
PODB penalty amounts.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service list maintained by the Commission in the docket 
referenced above and on interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before December 4, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31652 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### L. G. BALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADMINISTRATOR OF the DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OF the DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, State of Louisiana, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11346.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Feb. 3, 1970.

John A. Files, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellant.

Marion Weimer, James A. Piper, and James A. McGraw, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

Before AYRES, DIXON and WILLIAMS, JJ.

DIXON, Judge.

This is an appeal in an unemployment compensation case.

The claimant was denied unemployment compensation at every stage of the proceedings. He was a common laborer doing “cemetery work” for about eleven years. While receiving unemployment compensation, he was referred to a job at P & H Tube Corporation as a common laborer at $1.75 an hour. His previous rate of pay was $1.85 an hour. The claimant did not report to P & H, and his unemployment compensation was terminated under the provisions of R.S. 23:1601(3) because he failed to apply for available work “without good cause.”

The claimant’s excuse was that he heard that a former employer was about to get *471a contract and might have work for him that would pay him $2.50 an hour.

The other job did not materialize. There was no evidence offered to show that appellant’s hope of the better job was anything more than a fond hope. This hope did not furnish a substantial or compelling reason for the appellant’s failure to accept the work offered him at P & H Tube Corporation.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62659-62660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2648]


Office of Foreign Missions (OFM); 60-Day Notice of Proposed 
Information Collection; DSP-99 (Application for Diplomatic Exemption 
From Taxes on Utilities), and DSP-99A (Application for Diplomatic 
Exemption From Taxes on Gasoline)

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purposes of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Originating Office: The Office of Foreign Missions (OFM).
    Title of Information Collections: DSP-99 (Application for 
Diplomatic Exemption from Taxes on Utilities), and

[[Page 62660]]

DSP-99A (Application for Diplomatic Exemption from Taxes on Gasoline.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: DSP-99 and DSP-99A.
    Respondents: Foreign diplomatic missions and personnel.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 40,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 12 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 664 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
Eliza McClenaghan,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30736 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-44-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Midstream Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Mike Stice, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ J. MIKE STICE      
|J. Mike Stice          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|Date: March 11, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

    WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of CT Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge on the date hereof:

         (a)      the Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended September
                  30, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                /S/ Michael R. Coltrane
                                ----------------------------------------
                                Michael R. Coltrane
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                November 14, 2002

                                /S/ James E. Hausman
                                ----------------------------------------
                                James E. Hausman
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                November 14, 2002
No. 00-7178.

#### Baumer *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.