alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash
flows as reported in the Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             Apr-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                         18,495
<SECURITIES>                                    6,503
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,303
<INVENTORY>                                    55,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              107,686
<PP&E>                                        208,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                109,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                228,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          54,948
<BONDS>                                        99,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           93
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  228,182
<SALES>                                        55,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               56,330
<CGS>                                          42,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (688)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)



</TABLE>
63120 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of Secretary

[Transmittal No. 98–08]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/RM, (703)

604–6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 98–08,

with attached transmittal, policy

justification, Section 620C(d) of the

Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, and

sensitivity of technology pages.

Dated: November 20, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternative OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63121
63122 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63123
63124 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices

[FR Doc. 97–30993 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–C
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09097**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 09097\09097_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09097\09097_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09097\09097_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09097\09097_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09097\09097_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09097\09097_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09097\09097_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09097\09097_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09097\09097_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09097\Certification Statement Plant ID 09097.pdf Plant certification statement 09097\PlantID_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 09097\Supplemental Documents\Linden Site Drawings\09097_006 Schematic of Flow.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09097\Supplemental Documents\Linden Site Drawings\linden2007_siteplan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
----

----

----

|                  EXHIBIT 15.5               CONSENT OF RUNGEPINCOCKMINARCO LIMITED                              165 South Union Blvd, Suite 950, Denver, CO 80228-2226  | Runge, Inc. dbaRungePincockMinarco 165 S. Union BoulevardSuite 950Lakewood, Colorado  80228 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| RE: | Tasman Metals Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the Year Ended August 31, 2013 (the “2013 MD&A”). |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1.      | The amended and restated technical report entitled “Amended and RestatedPreliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Norra Kärr (REE - Y - Zr) Deposit, Gränna, Sweden” dated July 9, 2013, which we prepared (the "Norra Kärr PEA Report"); and |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.      | The technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Norra Karr REE - Zirconium Deposit, Granna, Sweden” dated January 20, 2011, which we prepared  (the “Technical Report”). |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
#### GROVPAC CORP., Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political entity of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-485.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 10, 1970.

Kates & Ress and Leonard A. Carson, North Miami, for appellant.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and St. Julien P. Rosemond, Asst. County Atty., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant Grovpac has taken this appeal from a final order of the Circuit Court of Dade County which denied its petition for certiorari. Originally, the Zoning Appeals Board had approved the appellant’s application for an unusual use of its property, to-wit: a mobile home trailer park. The decision of the Zoning Appeals Board granted certain variances and special exceptions to the existing ordinance. This ruling was appealed to the Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners, and that body reversed the original decision of the Zoning Appeals Board. The appellant thereupon filed its petition for certiorari in the Circuit Court of Dade County, which, having been denied, has led to this appeal.

We have carefully considered the record, all points on appeal, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that the Circuit Court was correct in denying the petition for certiorari. The Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners denied, without prejudice, the appellant’s application for unusual use of its property (as a mobile home trailer park) and also denied the requested variances and *417special exceptions. It is our holding that said denial was amply supported in law and fact. In City of Miami Beach v. Silver, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 646, the Supreme Court stated:

> “One who assails [a comprehensive zoning ordinance] must carry the burden of both *alleging and proving*that the Municipal enactment is invalid, [emphasis by the court] (Citations omitted.) The burden of one who attacks such an ordinance has been called an extraordinary one. (Citations omitted.)” Id., at 647.

Our decision should not be construed as a holding that this court either approves or disapproves of the future use of this property as a mobile home trailer park.

No error having been made to appear, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Ballot on the Proposed Suspension of Benefits for the 

Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local 5 New York 

Retirement Fund Pension Plan 

The proposed suspension of benefits under the Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local 5 New York 

Retirement Fund Pension Plan (the “Fund”) is explained in a notice to you dated August 1, 2016. It is now 

time to vote on the proposed suspension. As you consider whether to vote for or against the suspension, 

please keep the following in mind: 

The proposed benefit suspension will apply to all current and future pensioners. On average, the 

suspension reduces the benefits of the current and future pensioners by 24%. However, the actual 

percentage reduction will vary from 0% to 81%, depending upon each pensioner’s age and other factors. 

The proposed suspension will remain in effect indefinitely and will not expire by its own terms. The effect 

of the suspension on your benefit is shown on the statement delivered with this ballot. 

The proposed suspension has already been approved by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with 

the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the “PBGC”) and the Secretary of Labor. 

The Fund’s Trustees support the proposed suspension, because you will receive a larger benefit than if the 

Fund became insolvent and ran out of money. Although the exact date is unknown, unless the proposed 

suspension takes effect, the Fund is expected to become insolvent during the Plan Year beginning January 

2022. The Fund’s insolvency will result in benefits lower than benefits paid under the proposed 

suspension. In addition, the PBGC, which subsidizes the benefits of insolvent funds might also run out 

of money, if this Fund and other funds become insolvent. In the event the PBGC becomes insolvent, your 

benefit will most likely be lower than benefits otherwise paid in the case of the Fund’s insolvency. 

Taking into account the proposed suspension of benefits, the Fund’s actuary has certified that insolvency 

will be avoided. Although not certain, it represents the actuary’s best projection based on all available 

data. 

Attached please find the following: 

 A statement in favor of the suspension 

 A statement opposed to the suspension 

 an estimate of the effect the suspension will have on your benefit 

Please review the attached before making your decision. 

The proposed suspension will go into effect unless a majority of all eligible voters reject it. A failure 

to vote has the same effect on the outcome as a vote in favor of the proposed suspension.

Your ID number for the purpose of this vote is XXXXX. 

To register your vote, please go to www.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or call (XXX) XXX-XXXX and enter your 

ID number and your vote. 

You must vote by XX/XX/2017 in order for your vote to count.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
MICHAEL J. SHEA, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMPUTER HORIZONS CORP.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a)    designed
such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

(b)    evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.    The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

|Date:                                                      |  | December 30, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Michael J. SheaMICHAEL J. SHEA
Chief Financial Officer |  |                   |  | 

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62663-62664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Office of the Secretary
[Public Notice 2656]


Extension of the Restriction on the Use of United States 
Passports for Travel To, In, or Through Libya

    On December 11, 1981, pursuant to the authority of 22 U.S.C. 211a 
and Executive Order 11295 (31 FR 10603), and in accordance with 22 CFR 
51.73(a)(3), all United States passports were declared invalid for 
travel to, in, or through Libya unless specifically validated for such 
travel. This restriction has been renewed yearly because of the 
unsettled relations between the United States and the Government of 
Libya and the possibility of hostile acts against Americans in Libya.
    The Government of Libya still maintain a decidedly anti-American 
stance and continues to emphasize its willingness to direct hostile 
acts against the United States and its nationals. The American Embassy 
in Tripoli remains closed, thus preventing the United States from 
providing routine diplomatic protection or consular

[[Page 62664]]

assistance to Americans who may travel to Libya.
    In light of these events and circumstances, I have determined that 
Libya continues to be an era ``* * * where there is imminent danger to 
the public health or physical safety of United States travelers'' 
within the meaning of 22 U.S.C. 221a and 22 CFR 51-73(a)(3).
    Accordingly, all United States passports shall remain invalid for 
travel to, in, or through Libya unless specifically validated for such 
travel under the authority of the Secretary of State.
    The Public Notice shall be effective upon publication in the 
Federal Register and shall expire at midnight November 24, 1998, unless 
extended or sooner revoked by Public Notice.
    Date: November 20, 1997.
Strobe Talbott,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30988 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-66-M
#### METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. EL PASO CORPORATION and Arvida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-747.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 1970.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and St. Julien P. Rosemond, Asst. County Atty., for appellant.

Aronovitz, Aronovitz & Haverfield and Arnold D. Schatzman, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tollius v. City of Miami, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 122; Town of Palm Beach v. Leach, Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 743; Manilow v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.App. 1968, 213 So.2d 589.
* This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the

case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the application for a certificate of appealability and

appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would

not materially assist the determination of this matter. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without

oral argument.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 4, 2009

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DONALD ALTON HARPER,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-3354

(D.C. No. 2:93-CR-20069-JWL-1)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before KELLY, McKAY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.**

Donald Alton Harper, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the district court’s order

dismissing his motion for relief from judgment. We deny the request for a COA

and dismiss the appeal.
-2-

Mr. Harper was convicted in 1994 of armed bank robbery and using or

carrying a firearm during the robbery. The motion at issue in this case

purportedly sought relief from Mr. Harper’s convictions pursuant to Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure 48, 51, and 52(b) but the district court construed the

motion as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct Mr. Harper’s sentence pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court noted that the current motion was

Mr. Harper’s seventh motion challenging the legality of his detention and that the

previous six motions were all denied. The district court noted further that in

order to file a successive § 2255 motion, Mr. Harper must seek authorization from

the court of appeals. The district court indicated that it had the option of

transferring the motion to this court or it could dismiss the motion. The district

court explained that Mr. Harper had previously been warned about filing frivolous

motions and that Mr. Harper’s current motion lacked merit and was not likely

filed in good faith. Because of this, the district court determined that it was not

in the interest of justice to transfer Mr. Harper’s motion to this court and it

dismissed the motion. 

In a recent opinion, this court warned Mr. Harper that he would be subject

to sanctions if he continued to file frivolous motions challenging the legality of

his detention. See United States v. Harper, 545 F.3d 1230, 1234 (10th Cir. 2008). 

We conclude that the underlying motion filed by Mr. Harper was frivolous and

that Mr. Harper lacked a good faith basis to appeal from the district court’s
-3-

dismissal of that motion. Accordingly, we DENY the request for a COA and

DISMISS the appeal. See 10th Cir. R. 46.5(D)(1) (providing for dismissal as

a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal).

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Columbus Southern Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly
Keller Koeppel, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Holly Keller
Koeppel_


Holly
Keller Koeppel


Chief
Financial Officer








May 1,
2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.