alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ballonbau Wörner GmbH · Zirbelstrasse 57c · D-86154 Augsburg · Germany · Tel.: +49-(0)821-450 40 60 · Fax: +49-(0)821-419641 · info@ballonbau.de · www.ballonbau.de

Seite/Page -1- / 1

Technische Mitteilung

Technical Note

Ballonbau Wörner GmbH Seite/page –1/1-

EASA.BA.009-6

Gegenstand: Betriebs- und Instandhaltungsanweisungen

Subject: Operating Instructions and Instructions for Continued Airworthiness

Betroffen: Freiballonmuster NL – STU (Kennblatt EASA.BA.009)

Types affected: Free Manned Gas Balloon Type NL – STU (TCDS EASA.BA.009)

Gültigkeit: Alle Ballone ab Werk-Nr. 1038 einschließlich

Eligibility:: All balloons from serial number 1038 and up

Vorgang: 1. Aufteilung des Fahrt- und Betriebshandbuches, Ausgabe1, Januar 1993, in je 

ein separates Flughandbuch und Anweisungen zur Aufrechterhaltung der 

Lufttüchtigkeit.

2. Änderung des Abschnitts über Beschränkungen der Lufttüchtigkeit in den 

Anweisungen zur Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit.

Process: 1. Dividing up the Flight and Instruction Manual, issue 1, January 1993, into each a separate a 

Flight Manual and Instructions for Continued Airworthiness.

2. Change to the Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) of the Instructions for Continued 

Airworthiness (ICA).

Maßnahmen: 1. Änderung des Fahrt- und Betriebshandbuches, Ausgabe 1, Januar 1993, durch 

Einfügen/Ersetzen der Seiten 4 und 5a, Ausgabe November 2013;

und Entfernen der Kapitel 5, 6, 7 und des Anhang.

2. Neuausgabe der Anweisungen zur Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit

(Instandhaltungshandbuch), Ausgabe November 2013:

- in deutscher Sprache (gültig für EASA.BA.009)

- in englischer Sprache (gültig für B03CE)

Action to be taken: 1. Change to the Flight and Instruction Manual, issue January 1993, by inserting/replacing the pages 

4 and 5a, issue November 2013;

and removing the Chapters 5, 6, 7 and the Annexe.

2. New issue of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA), issue November 2013:

- in German language (valid for EASA.BA.009)

- in English language (valid for B03CE)

Hinweis: Entsprechend EASA Verfahren PR.CAP.00001-002 (Aufrechterhaltung der 

Lufttüchtigkeit der Musterbauart), 4.(c), führt eine Änderung des Abschnitts 

Beschränkungen der Lufttüchtigkeit, die eine neue oder weiter beschränkende 

verpflichtende Wartung einführt, zur Ausgabe einer Lufttüchtigkeitsanweisung 

(LTA). Diese Technische Mitteilung ist Gegenstand einer LTA.

Remark According to EASA procedure PR.CAP.00001-002 (Continuing Airworthiness of Type Design 

(CAP)), 4.(c), a revision to the Airworthiness Limitations Sections (ALS) that introduces a new or 

more restrictive mandatory maintenance tasks should lead to issuance of an Airworthiness Directive 

(AD). This Technical Note is subject to an AD.

Ausgestellt: Ballonbau Wörner GmbH Zugelassen durch die EASA am: 03. Dezember 2013

Issued: EASA approved on: December 03, 2013

Datum: 07. November 2013 mit Zulassungs-Nr.: 10047322

Date: November 07, 2013 under Approval No: 10047322

Unterschrift:

Signature:

Michael Wörner
Frequently Asked Questions on the Government Securities Investment Fund 

August 2, 2021 

1. What is the Government Securities Investment Fund? 

The G Fund is a money market defined-contribution retirement fund for Federal employees. 

2. How does the debt ceiling affect the G Fund? 

The G Fund is invested in special-issue Treasury securities, which count against the debt limit. 

The entire balance matures daily and is ordinarily reinvested. In 1987, Congress granted 

Treasury the statutory authority to suspend reinvestment of all or part of the balance of the G 

Fund when the Secretary determines that the Fund cannot be fully invested without exceeding 

the debt limit. 

3. How much headroom will this Treasury action involving the G Fund provide? 

As of July 31, $276 billion. The balance of the G Fund can fluctuate for a variety of reasons. 

Based on recent historical trends, Treasury expects that approximately $270 billion is a more 

accurate estimate of the value of the G Fund when projecting how long extraordinary measures 

may last. 

4. What impact will this action have on Federal employees and their retirement benefits? 

By law, the G Fund will be made whole once the debt limit is increased. Federal retirees and 

employees will be unaffected by this action. 

5. Has Treasury ever suspended reinvestment of all or part of the G Fund before? 

Yes, in the past 26 years, Treasury used this extraordinary measure in 1995-96, 2002, 2003, 

2004, 2006, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2017-2018, and 2019.
AIPT 538
AIPT 539
MEMORANDUM

# EPA New

England

DATE: February 9, 2010 SUBJ : Rhode Island Preliminary 2009 Ozone Data FROM : Richard Burkhart fvl'~? Air QualityPlanning Unit Thru: Anne Arnold, Manager Af~

Air Quality Planning Unit To: Rhode Island Proposed Clean Data Determination Docket The EPAis proposing to determine that the Providence (All of Rhode Island) moderate 1997 8- hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This determination is based upon complete, quality-assured, certified ambient air monitoring data that shows the area has monitored attainment ofthe 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2006-2008monitoring period. Under EPAregulations at 40 CFRPart 50, the 1997 8-hour ozonestandard is attained when the 3-year average ofthe annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations at an ozone monitor is less than or equal to 0 .08parts per million (ppm) (i .e., 0 .084 ppm, based on the rounding convention in 40CFRPart 50, Appendix 1) . This 3-year average is referred to as the design value. When the design value is less than or equal to 0 .084 ppm

at each monitor within the area, then the area is meeting the NAAQS. (See 69 FR23857 (April 30, 2004) for further information

.) In addition, preliminary ozone data for 2009 show the area continues to meet the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This memorandum provides a printout ofthe preliminary ozone data for the 2009ozone season has been input into the EPAAQS systemby the RI Department of Environmental Management (RI DEM), as of February 3, 2010 . These data are attached to the memorandum

. As shown in Table 1 below, the preliminary 2009 fourth high 8-hour ozone values at all three sites in the area are below the 1997 8-hour ozonestandard. Ifthesepreliminary 2009 fourth highs are used with the data from2007 and 2008, the designvalues for

this area arestill below the 1997 ozone standard. Table 1. Fourth-High 8-hour OzoneAverage Concentrations and Design Values (parts per million) in the Rhode Island Area, 2009 Data is Preliminary, as of February 3, 2010 Site Number Site Name 4th High 4th High Preliminary Preliminary 2007 2008 2009 4t' high Design Values 8-hour ozone 2007-2009 440030002 West 0 .089 0.074 0 .069 ppm 0

.077 ppm I Greenwich 440071010 East Providence 0 .088 0

.077 0

.066 ppm 0

.077 ppm 440090007 Narragansett 0 .083 0

.081 0

.068 ppm 0.076 ppm

At all three sites, the preliminary 2007-2009 design values are lower than the 2006-2008 design values. In conclusion, the preliminary ozone data for2009 do not change the conclusions ofthe proposed Clean Data Determination that the area meets the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Final 2007- 2009 design values will not be available until the RIDEM certifies theAQS data, most likely in May2010

. Attachments: Preliminary 2009 1-hour ozone data for RI

Preliminary 2009 8-hour ozone data for RI
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


For Immediate Release


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
GRANTS TRANSFER OF COMSAT LICENSES
TO LOCKHEED MARTIN

     Action Clears Way for Completion of Lockheed Martin/COMSAT Combination


BETHESDA, Maryland, July 31, 2000 - A Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

order released today granting COMSAT Corporation authority to assign its space

and earth stations licenses to a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin will permit

completion of a strategic combination between the two companies.


In issuing the order, the FCC noted that after the merger the resulting

competition "will promote wider service offerings and lower prices for consumers

in the United States and abroad."


Lockheed Martin and COMSAT indicated they would finalize their combination later

this week.

                                     # # #

CONTACT: Charles Manor, Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications, 301/897-6258
Exhibit 31.3.2 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

O&R—Principal Financial Officer 

 

I, Robert N. Hoglund, the principal financial officer of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended September 30, 2004 of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 5, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 4, 1997, 8:30 
a.m to 5 p.m.
    Location: Holiday Inn, Versailles Ballrooms I and II, 8120 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD.
    Contact Person: Rhonda W. Stover, or Robinette Taylor, Center for 
Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug Administration, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-5455, or FDA Advisory 
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the 
Washington, DC area), code 12544. Please call the Information Line for 
up-to-date information on this meeting.
    Agenda: On December 4, 1997, the committee will hear presentations 
from the Institute of Medicine on the marketed product 
Halcion<Register> (triazolam, Pharmacia and Upjohn Co.).
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by December 1, 
1997. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Time allotted for each 
presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral 
presentations should notify the contact person before December 1, 1997, 
and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or 
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed 
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to 
make their presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-30034 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 21-1865

___________________________

 

Rafael Antonio Segovia-Yanes

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

Submitted: September 28, 2022

Filed: October 3, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

 

Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

 

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Segovia-Yanes, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an 

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the denial of his application 

for cancellation of removal. Segovia argues that removing him would cause 

“exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to his American-citizen children. 8 

U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). We will not consider this argument because Segovia 
-2- 

failed to raise it before the Board. See Bakor v. Barr, 958 F.3d 732, 739 (8th Cir. 

2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 2566 (2021); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (requiring 

exhaustion of administrative remedies before judicial review). We accordingly 

dismiss the petition for review.

______________________________
Nicholas Courtney

Colorado Aerial Productions, LLC 4852 E Kentucky Ave, Unit B

Denver CO, 80246

Specific Title 14 federal regulations sections in which Colorado Aerial Productions, LLC is seeking an exemption:

45.23 (b), 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.9 (b) (2), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a) & (b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b)

These exemptions are requested concerning commercial operation of a DJI Phantom 3 Professional Unmanned Aircraft Systems(UAS, and h ereby referred to as such), pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112

- 95)

Extent of relief and our reason for seeking relief:

In order to use our UAS for commercial use. We are seeking these exemptions in order to legally engage in business and comply with all federal regulations and standards put forth by the FAA while operating our UAS.

How our request would benefit the public:

Granting these exemption requests for Colorado Aerial Productions, LLC wou ld allow for us to be able to efficiently, legally, economically, and safely perform aerial videography and photography of special events, sporting events, land surveillance, real estate, commercial inspections, and commercial maintenance over certain area s of the United States. My services could lead to more and faster home sales, for just one example. Also, many of these productions would typically use manned helicopters that needlessly put human lives at risk. This would no longer be the case with the use of our UAS systems. Further, inspections of structures can be performed without endangering the inspector or inhibiting local industrial or public operations with ladders, lifts, or other equipment.

Reasons why these exemptions would not adversely a ffect safety:

Colorado Aerial Productions, LLC would STRICTLY adhere to the FAA regulations regarding UAV flight. These include, but are not limited to: Not flying within 5 miles of an airport without notification of said airport, not exceeding 200ft el evation, not flying within 15 miles of the White House, not flying in National Parks, and always keeping the UAS in line of sight. A maintenence check is performed on the UAS after, and before, each flight. Safety for myself and the general public is my top priority.

SummaryColorado Aerial Productions, LLC is seeking relief from the requirements of Title 14 of the code

of federal regulations sections, pursuant to section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform

Act of 2012:

45.23 (b), 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.9 (b) (2), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a) & (b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b)

We are seeking these exemptions in order to use our UAS for commercial purposes.

Nicholas Courtney

Colorado Aerial Productions, L LC 4852 E Kentucky Ave, Unit B

Denver CO, 80246 Colorado.Aerial.Productions@gmail.com
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 I, David A. Shadduck, the chief financial officer of TruServ Corporation,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)   This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended
               March 29, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
               requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
               Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of TruServ Corporation.



Dated: May 13, 2003


/s/ DAVID A. SHADDUCK
-----------------------------
David A. Shadduck
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10085

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BRIAN KELLEY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-359-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brian Kelley has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Kelley has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Kelley’s claims of ineffective assistance 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10085 Document: 00513722068 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 16-10085

2

of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Kelley’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10085 Document: 00513722068 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1903 

To amend title II of the Higher Education Act of 1965 with respect to 

partnership grants for the establishment of rural teaching residency 

programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mr. BOST (for himself and Mr. GOLDEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

with respect to partnership grants for the establishment 

of rural teaching residency programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Education In5 vestment Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1903 IH

1 SEC. 2. PARTNERSHIP GRANTS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT 

2 OF RURAL TEACHING RESIDENCY PRO3 GRAMS. 

4 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 200 of the Higher Edu5 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1021) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (16) through 

7 (23) as paragraphs (17) through (24), respectively; 

8 and 

9 (2) by inserting after paragraph (15) the fol10 lowing new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(16) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY LOCATED

12 IN A RURAL AREA.—The term ‘local educational 

13 agency located in a rural area’ means a local edu14 cational agency that meets the eligibility require15 ments for funding under— 

16 ‘‘(A) the Small, Rural School Achievement 

17 Program under section 5211(b) of the Elemen18 tary and Secondary Education Act of 1965; or 

19 ‘‘(B) the Rural and Low-Income School 

20 Program under section 5221(b) of the Elemen21 tary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.’’. 

22 (b) GRANT AWARDS.—Section 202(e) of the Higher 

23 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1022a(e)) is amended 

24 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

25 ‘‘(3) SELECTION OF GRANTEES.— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1903 IH

1 ‘‘(A) PERCENTAGE OF RURAL LOCAL EDU2 CATIONAL AGENCIES.—Before the start of each 

3 award year, the Secretary shall determine, 

4 based on the number of students in kinder5 garten through grade 12 who are served by all 

6 local educational agencies, the percentage of 

7 students in kindergarten through grade 12 who 

8 are served by local educational agencies located 

9 in rural areas. 

10 ‘‘(B) GRANT RESERVATION FOR RURAL

11 LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.—Beginning 

12 with the first award year that begins after the 

13 date of enactment of the ‘Rural Education In14 vestment Act’, the Secretary shall ensure that, 

15 of the total amount awarded for grants under 

16 this subsection for an award year, the percent17 age of such total amount that is awarded to eli18 gible partnerships that are in partnership with 

19 a local educational agency located in a rural 

20 area shall not be less than the percentage deter21 mined by the Secretary under subparagraph (A) 

22 for such award year.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 00-7316.

#### Singh *v.*Council/Bureau for Private Postsecondary & Vocational Education.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.