alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Technology Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| July 1, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark |
|--------------|---------------------|
|         | Michael G. Clark    |
|         | President           |
|         | DWS Technology Fund |

 

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Technology Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| July 1, 2009 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|--------------|---------------------------------------|
|         | Paul Schubert                         |
|         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|         | DWS Technology Fund                   |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59779-59780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 614 and 619
RIN 3052-AB64


Loan Policies and Operations; Definitions; Loan Underwriting; 
Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule 
under parts 614 and 619 on

[[Page 59780]]

September 30, 1997 (62 FR 51007). The final rule amends the regulations 
relating to loan underwriting in response to comments received from the 
FCA Board's initiative to reduce regulatory burden and in an effort to 
streamline the regulations and set clear minimum regulatory standards 
where appropriate. In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective 
date of the final rule is 30 days from the date of publication in the 
Federal Register during which either or both Houses of Congress are in 
session. Based on the records of the sessions of Congress, the 
effective date of the regulations is November 5, 1997.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulation amending 12 CFR parts 614 and 619 
published on September 30, 1997 (62 FR 51007) is effective November 5, 
1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John J. Hays, Policy Analyst, Policy Development and Risk Control, Farm 
Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4498;

      or

Joy E. Strickland, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm 
Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TDD (703) 
883-4444.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

    Dated: October 31, 1997.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 97-29272 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
H. R. 1651 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-one 

An Act 

To amend the CARES Act to extend the sunset for the definition of a small 

business debtor, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Bankruptcy Relief 

Extension Act of 2021’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1113 of the CARES Act (Public Law 

116–136) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(5) (11 U.S.C. 1182 note), by striking 

‘‘1 year’’ and inserting ‘‘2 years’’; and 

(2) in subsection (b)(2)(B) (11 U.S.C. 101 note), by striking 

‘‘1 year’’ and inserting ‘‘2 years’’. 

(b) MODIFICATION OF PLAN AFTER CONFIRMATION.— 

(1) Section 1329(d)(1) of title 11, United States Code, is 

amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 

‘‘this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘the COVID–19 Bankruptcy 

Relief Extension Act of 2021’’. 

(2) Section 1113(b)(1)(D)(ii) of the CARES Act (11 U.S.C. 

1329 note) is amended by striking ‘‘this Act’’ and inserting 

‘‘the COVID–19 Bankruptcy Relief Extension Act of 2021’’. 

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 

to the vote on passage. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document

 

  
                                                                         




   Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT NUMBER 17
TO THE CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY PENSION PLAN
CONSOLIDATED AS AT JANUARY 1, 2009


AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2022
1.Clause 8.01(b)(iii) is deleted and replaced with the following:
“(iii)    multiplied by the applicable percentage determined from the following table:


															
	Period of
Pensionable Service
	If Member’s last date of hire was before:
	then the following percentage is used:
	If Member’s last date of hire is on or after:
	then the following percentage is used:

	

	

	

	

	


	TCRC-MWED Service	June 1, 2013
	1.80%
	June 1, 2013
	1.70%

	CPPA	June 1, 2013
	1.80%
	June 1, 2013
	1.70%

	USW Service	January 1, 2022
	1.90%
	January 1, 2022
	1.70%

	IBEW Service	January 1, 2021
	1.80%
	January 1, 2021
	1.70%

	Unifor Service	May 1, 2015
	1.80%
	May 1, 2015
	1.70%

	TCRC-RTE Service	June 1, 2013
	1.80%
	June 1, 2013
	1.70%

	RCTC Service	June 1, 2013
	1.80%
	June 1, 2013
	1.70%

	Management Service
	June 1, 2013
	1.30%
	June 1, 2013
	1.30%







1



 

2.Delete subparagraph 8.08(a) and replace it with the following:
“(a)    Pension Limit Date, Prior Pension Limit, and Future Pension Limit are the dates and amounts, as applicable, set out in the table below:
															
			1	2	3
		Period of 
Pensionable Service	Pension Limit Date	Prior Pension Limit	Future Pension Limit
		TCRC-MWED Service	June 1, 2013	$1,975	$1,715
		CPPA Service	June 1, 2013	$1,975	$1,715
		USW Service	January 1, 2022	$1,975	$1,715
		IBEW Service	January 1, 2021	$2,075	$1,715
		Unifor Service	May 1, 2015	$2,050	$1,715
		TCRC-RTE Service	June 1, 2013	$2,200	$1,715
		RCTC Service	June 1, 2013	$2,200	$1,715
		Management Service	June 1, 2013	$1,975	$1,715






2
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                             CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Three Months Ended September 30            Nine Months Ended September 30
                                    --------------------------------          --------------------------------
                                        1999                1998                 1999                  1998
                                    -----------          -----------          -----------          -----------
<S>                                   <C>                  <C>                  <C>                  <C>
Computation of share
totals used in
computing earnings
per share:

Weighted average number
 of shares outstanding                9,368,722            9,295,095            9,344,371            9,202,414

Basic average shares

a-Outstanding                         9,368,722            9,295,095            9,344,371            9,202,414

Incremental shares
 arising, from out-
 standing stock
 options                                 58,497               47,981               58,497               48,299
                                    -----------          -----------          -----------          -----------

 b-Totals                             9,427,219            9,343,076            9,402,868            9,250,713
                                    ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========

c-Net Income                        $ 5,008,263          $ 3,196,049          $18,007,958          $ 9,515,055
                                    ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========


Net Income Per Share
 Basic - c/a                        $       .53          $       .34          $      1.93          $      1.03
                                    ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========

Net Income Per Share
assuming full dilution c/b          $       .53          $       .34          $      1.92          $      1.03
                                    ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========
</TABLE>

                                      -20-
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert F. PETER.

No. 62831.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 14, 1978.

In re: Robert F. Peter applying for writs of certiorari, (writ of review), prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. Bond pending review reduced to $1,500.00..

SANDERS, C. J., is of the opinion that the showing made is insufficient to warrant a reduction of the bond.

SUMMERS, J., dissents and is of the opinion the showing made does not warrant a finding that the trial judge has abused his discretion which this action of the Court implies.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of China Du Kang Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/  Liu Su YingLiu Su YingChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)November 7, 2011
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of  China Du Kang Co., Ltd. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Treasury approves Alaska’s plan to invest $10.4 million of CPF funding in 

multi-purpose community facilities to improve resources for communities 

that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Alaska

 

▪ Program Summary: $10.4 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (9% of 

CPF allocation)

▪ Program Description: Alaska will use this CPF award 

to fund the construction of two facilities that function 

both as a job center and a center for Head Start and 

childcare in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta region. The 

job center will offer youth counseling, GED tutoring, 

and free access to computers and the internet. The

center housing the Head Start program will provide free early education to 

children ages 3 to 5 and nutritional support. 

▪ Key State Contact: Association of Village Council Presidents (AVCP)

Alaska Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

The facilities will 

benefit two 

communities in the 

region, each serving 

approximately 628 

individuals.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report of NewWestern Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2014 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacitiesand on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

 

 

/s/ Javan Khazali

 

Javan Khazali

President (Principal Executive Officer)

April 15, 2015

 

 

 

/s/ Haris Baha

Haris Baha

Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2191 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2191

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
                deductions for personal casualty losses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

 Ms. Brownley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
                deductions for personal casualty losses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Homeowners from Disaster 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR PERSONAL CASUALTY LOSSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 165(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking paragraph (5).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to losses sustained in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.(the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Dated: August 2, 2007
AFS-14-382-E 

August 19, 2014 

 Exemption No. 5533K 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-7980 

Mr. Mark J. Millam 

Managing Director, Saftey 

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. d/b/a Airlines for America 

1302 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Mr. Millam: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 5533, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 9, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Air Transport Association of America d/b/a Airlines for America (A4A) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 5533, as amended. That exemption from § 121.311(b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows A4A member airlines and other 

similarly situated part 121 operators to permit qualified flight attendants not required by 

§ 121.391(c) to perform duties related to the safety of the airplane and its occupants during 

aircraft movement on the surface. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to A4A. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 5533, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the 

FAA Administrator has delegated to me, Air Transport Association of America, Inc. d/b/a 

Airlines for America is granted an extension of its exemption from 14 CFR 121.311(b) which 

allows A4A member airlines and other similarly situated part 121 operators to permit 

qualified flight attendants not required by § 121.391(c) to perform duties related to the safety 

of the airplane and its occupants during aircraft movement on the surface. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 5533, as amended, to 

October 31, 2016, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John Barbagallo 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
Exhibit 99.7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bellatrix
Exploration Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond G. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of the operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date:	March 24, 2014







|/s/ Raymond G. Smith                 
|-------------------------------------
|Raymond G. Smith                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7244

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOSHUA BOWER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III, District Judge. ( 5:15

- cr - 00322

- D

- 1 ; 5:18

- cv - 00246

- D )

Submitted : December 21 , 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Joshua Bower , Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, Nort h Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Joshua Bower seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on h is
28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is
debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a co nstitutional right.
Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bower has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Bower’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMI SSED