40132 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Notices 

Australian Lightwater (OPAL) research 

reactor fuel clad in aluminum, from the 

Australian Nuclear Science and 

Technology Organisation (ANSTO) in 

Lucas Heights, Sydney, Australia, to the 

Deposito de Materiales Nucleares 

(DEMANU) and/or Deposito de Uranio 

Enriquecido (DUE) warehouses of 

Comision Nacional de Energia Atomica 

(CNEA) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The 

material, which is currently located at 

ANSTO’s OPAL reactor, will be 

transferred to the CNEA DEMANU and/ 

or DUE warehouses for storage. ANSTO 

originally obtained the material 

pursuant to export license XSNM03282, 

Amendment No. 01, and export license 

XSNM03348, Amendment No. 01. 

In accordance with section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended, it has been determined that 

this subsequent arrangement concerning 

the retransfer of nuclear material of 

United States origin will not be inimical 

to the common defense and security of 

the United States. 

Dated: June 19, 2013. 

For the Department of Energy. 

Anne M. Harrington, 

Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear 

Nonproliferation. 

[FR Doc. 2013–15978 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement 

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and 

International Security, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Proposed subsequent 

arrangement. 

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued 

under the authority of section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended. The Department is providing 

notice of a proposed subsequent 

arrangement under the Agreement for 

Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of 

Nuclear Energy Between the 

Government of the United States of 

America and the Government of Canada 

and the Agreement for Cooperation in 

the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy 

Between the United States of America 

and the European Atomic Energy 

Community. 

DATES: This subsequent arrangement 

will take effect no sooner than July 18, 

2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Sean Oehlbert, Office of 

Nonproliferation and International 

Security, National Nuclear Security 

Administration, Department of Energy. 

Telephone: 202–586–3806 or email: 

Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

subsequent arrangement concerns the 

retransfer of 591,716 kg of U.S.-origin 

natural uranium hexafluoride (UF6) 

(67.60% U), 400,000 kg of which is 

uranium, from Cameco Corporation 

(Cameco) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 

Canada, to URENCO in Capenhurst, 

Chester, United Kingdom. The material, 

which is currently located at Cameco, 

Port Hope, Ontario, will be used for toll 

enrichment by URENCO at its facility in 

Capenhurst. The material was originally 

obtained by Cameco from Power 

Resources Inc., Cameco ResourcesCrowe Butte Operation, and White Mesa 

Mill pursuant to export license 

XSOU8798. 

In accordance with section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended, it has been determined that 

this subsequent arrangement concerning 

the retransfer of nuclear material of 

United States origin will not be inimical 

to the common defense and security of 

the United States. 

Dated: June 19, 2013. 

For the Department of Energy. 

Anne M. Harrington, 

Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear 

Nonproliferation. 

[FR Doc. 2013–15975 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement 

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and 

International Security, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Proposed subsequent 

arrangement. 

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued 

under the authority of section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended. The Department is providing 

notice of a proposed subsequent 

arrangement under the Agreement for 

Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of 

Nuclear Energy Between the 

Government of the United States of 

America and the Government of Canada 

and the Agreement for Cooperation in 

the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy 

Between the United States of America 

and the European Atomic Energy 

Community. 

DATES: This subsequent arrangement 

will take effect no sooner than July 18, 

2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Sean Oehlbert, Office of 

Nonproliferation and International 

Security, National Nuclear Security 

Administration, Department of Energy. 

Telephone: 202–586–3806 or email: 

Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

subsequent arrangement concerns the 

retransfer of 591,716 kg of U.S.-origin 

natural uranium hexafluoride (UF6) 

(67.60% U), 400,000 kg of which is 

uranium, from Cameco Corporation 

(Cameco) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 

Canada, to URENCO in Almelo, 

Netherlands. The material, which is 

currently located at Cameco, Port Hope, 

Ontario, will be used for toll enrichment 

by URENCO at its facility in Almelo. 

The material was originally obtained by 

Cameco from Power Resources Inc., 

Cameco Resources-Crowe Butte 

Operation, and White Mesa Mill 

pursuant to export license XSOU8798. 

In accordance with section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended, it has been determined that 

this subsequent arrangement concerning 

the retransfer of nuclear material of 

United States origin will not be inimical 

to the common defense and security of 

the United States. 

Dated: June 19, 2013. 

For the Department of Energy. 

Anne M. Harrington, 

Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear 

Nonproliferation. 

[FR Doc. 2013–15981 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy 

Wave Energy Converter Prize 

Administration Webinar 

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy (EERE), U.S. 

Department of Energy (DOE). 

ACTION: Notice of a webinar and request 

for information. 

SUMMARY: The Wind and Water Power 

Technologies Office (WWPTO) is 

considering releasing a Funding 

Opportunity Announcement (FOA), 

tentatively titled, ‘‘Wave Energy 

Converter Prize Administration’’. The 

Office is planning a webinar in advance 

of any potential FOA to seek input from 

the public regarding possible 

approaches to structuring a prize 

competition related to wave energy 

converters. The WWPTO anticipates a 

multi-stage challenge that would 

culminate in the demonstration of Wave 

Energy Converter (WEC) devices in a 

wave tank test. The WWTPO anticipates 

that the top prize would be awarded to 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Notices 40133 

the entity capable of exceeding 

predetermined operational performance 

thresholds. Moreover, WWPTO is 

considering the competition to be 

administered by a third-party that may 

have involvement in defining, 

developing, and advertising the 

competitive challenge, as well as 

involvement in the awarding of any 

prizes. 

DATES: The WWPTO will hold a 

webinar on Thursday, July 18, 2013 

from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. EST. Written 

comments will be accepted through 

Thursday, July 25, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: The webinar can be 

accessed at https:// 

www1.gotomeeting.com/join/ 

123267576. 

You may submit written comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• E-Mail: WECworkshopweb@go.

doe.gov. 

• Postal Mail: Alison LaBonte, Marine 

and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology 

Development Manager, Wind and Water 

Power Technologies Office EE–2B, U.S. 

Department of Energy, 1000 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585. Please submit 

one signed paper original. Due to the 

potential delays in DOE’s receipt and 

processing of mail sent through the U.S. 

Postal Service, DOE encourages 

respondents to submit comments 

electronically to ensure timely receipt. 

Minutes and video recorded 

proceedings of the webinar will be made 

available for public review on the DOE 

Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy (EERE) Web site at: 

http://water.energy.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alison LaBonte, Marine and 

Hydrokinetic Energy Technology 

Development Manager, Wind and Water 

Power Technologies Office EE–2B, U.S. 

Department of Energy, 1000 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585, 

WECworkshopweb@go.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Webinar Purpose 

Purpose: The purpose of this notice is 

to gain public input regarding the 

development and implementation of a 

prize challenge for wave energy 

converters. The information collected by 

the webinar and this notice will be used 

for internal DOE planning including the 

potential development of a FOA. The 

webinar is open to all interested parties. 

All interested parties are encouraged to 

submit written comments. Parties 

interested in participating in the 

webinar and interested in providing 

comments might include, but are not 

limited to (1) Non-profit organizations, 

companies, and universities involved in 

the development of wave energy 

converters, (2) entities with experience 

in testing wave energy converters in 

tank test facilities, and (3) entities with 

experience in developing and 

administering technical competitions. 

Wave Energy Converter Prize 

Background 

In principle, challenges set a high 

technical bar for competitors to be 

eligible for a prize, and offer an 

attractive prize purse to the winner, 

thus facilitating rapid advancements 

through technical innovation at a 

relatively low cost to the sponsoring 

agency. A successful challenge strategy 

is one that quickly yields a number of 

viable solutions to increase the 

performance of WEC technologies above 

an aggressive but achievable 

performance threshold. 

It is intended that a WEC Prize could 

spur game changing innovations for 

next generation WEC technologies to 

drastically increase WEC performance. 

Intellectual property rights will be 

retained by the competitors. The prize 

competition will be conducted in 

accordance with the prize authority 

established in the America COMPETES 

Reauthorization Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 

3719). 

Challenge Stage Gates and Criteria for 

Evaluation 

The WWTPO anticipates that there 

could be many ways to formulate the 

challenge structure (i.e. number of 

stages and stage gates) for the WEC 

Prize. However, to engage in a more 

robust dialogue during the webinar, an 

example strategy is provided below. The 

WWPTO encourages commenters to 

provide alternative strategies and 

approaches for the prize administration. 

A multi stage-gate challenge structure 

requires competitors to pass through a 

series of stage gates based on various 

criteria. Generally, the criteria are 

designed to ensure that the prize winner 

holds the most commercially viable 

technology and has the highest potential 

for success in the actual open-ocean 

wave energy harvesting environment. 

The quantitative performance threshold 

for the final tank test is anticipated to 

be a function of absorbed energy; 

characteristic mass; surface area; and/or 

power take-off force criteria. 

Example challenge structure stages 

and stage-gates might include: 

Full Proposal Submission Stage: WEC 

prize competitors would initially submit 

full applications with proposed design 

concepts which would be evaluated 

against WEC prize performance goals. 

The applications would provide 

supporting evidence such as numerical 

simulation performance calculations, 

levelized cost of energy calculations 

demonstrating techno-economic 

viability of the concept at a commercial 

stage, and engineering justification to 

support concept design reliability and 

survivability at commercial scale. 

First Stage-gate: A judging panel 

would evaluate and select proposals 

based on pre-published criteria. 

Selected proposals would advance to a 

detailed design phase. 

Design Stage: Proposals selected to 

advance to the design stage would 

develop a detailed design demonstrating 

proof-of-concept via prototype bench 

top testing; WEC numerical modeling, 

validation, and refinement; and any 

design stage wave tank testing results. 

Second Stage-gate: A judging panel 

would conduct a critical design review 

and select up to 10 competitors to 

advance to the ‘‘build stage.’’ Those 

selected at this stage would receive a 

monetary award (e.g., $350,000) 

intended to be used to support scaled 

prototype fabrication. 

Build Stage: The selected competitors 

would proceed to the build stage and 

would be responsible for the 

procurement and construction of a 

scaled prototype WEC device ready for 

tank testing. 

Test and Evaluate Stage: The selected 

competitors would test their scaled 

prototype in a wave tank to 

quantitatively measure performance of 

the WEC device against performance 

criteria. 

Final Stage-gate: The judging panel 

would evaluate the tank test 

performance results and the overall 

device design against pre-determined 

performance criteria to select one 

winner to receive the prize purse. The 

WWPTO is considering a purse prize 

value of $1 million. 

Administration Implementation 

The WWPTO is considering having 

the WEC Prize challenge administered 

by a single awardee of the anticipated 

‘‘Wave Energy Converter Prize 

Administration’’ FOA. In addition to 

being responsible for the overall 

implementation of the challenge the 

awardee would potentially administer 

the prize purse (including seed funding) 

to the selected competitors. The 

WWTPO plans to separately arrange for 

a tank testing facility to be used in the 

challenge competition and technical 

experts to assist the administration 

entity with the development of 

quantitative performance threshold and 

other criteria the competitors will be 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
40134 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Notices 

evaluated against throughout the 

various stages of challenge. 

The anticipated scope for the 

administrative entity may include, but 

may not be limited to, the following: 

1. Work with the WWPTO to refine 

WEC Prize and to develop challenge 

strategy, including rule development, 

structure, planning, judging and 

evaluations, to meet those objectives. 

2. Collaborate with the technical 

expert as identified by the WWPTO to 

finalize testing and evaluation criteria 

for rule development. 

3. Coordinate with the tank test 

facility identified by the WWPTO for 

planning, scheduling, and executing the 

test and evaluate stage of the challenge. 

4. Promote the challenge to attract 

competitors to apply. 

5. Publish challenge rules and 

implement the challenge strategy to 

accomplish the objectives. 

6. Increase the awareness of MHK 

technology through the WEC Prize 

challenge with marketing and public 

relations. 

7. Provide the necessary qualified 

personnel, facilities, equipment, 

supplies, services, subcontractors, and 

related administrative and information 

technology support to accomplish the 

objectives. 

8. Coordinate and compensate judging 

panels, as applicable. 

9. Provide on-site coordination and 

logistics for judging panels and tank 

testing. 

10. Ensure the tank testing is in 

accordance to the rules of the prize. 

11. Provide the WWPTO access to the 

observation of all test and evaluation 

activities. 

12. Allow WWPTO access to records, 

files, and other data derived from this 

work. 

13. Provide winners with seed 

funding and prize award. 

Outside of the anticipated ‘‘Wave 

Energy Converter Prize Administration’’ 

FOA, the WWPTO anticipates that 

technical experts will assist the 

administrator with the following: 

• Assist the administration entity 

with the development of quantitative 

performance threshold and other criteria 

the competitors will be evaluated 

against throughout the various stages of 

the challenge 

• Collaborate with the tank test 

facility operators to determine tank test 

conditions for the testing and evaluation 

phase to ensure the conditions are 

consistent for WEC device competitors 

• Provide technical direction to the 

administrative entity developing the 

challenge rules 

• Provide technical direction to the 

administrative entity in selecting 

experts for judging panels 

• Development of the tank test 

instrumentation and data acquisition 

interface (in conjunction with the tank 

test facility) 

For the tank test facility in the final 

Test and Evaluate Stage, the WWPTO is 

considering arranging an agreement 

with the Naval Surface Warfare Center, 

Carderock Division, Maneuvering and 

Seakeeping Basin in West Bethesda, 

Maryland. The indoor freshwater basin 

is anticipated to be online in 2013 with 

216 independently controlled wave 

paddles capable of producing model sea 

state spectra of any distribution. The 

basin overall length is 110 m (360 ft), 

overall width is 73 m (240 ft), and depth 

of 6.1 (20 ft) and it includes a 10.7 m 

(35 ft) deep by 15.2 m (50 ft) wide 

trench parallel to the long side of the 

south side. 

Webinar Discussion Topics and 

Requested Information 

The questions below request 

information on both the structure of a 

potential prize competition as well as 

the technical criteria that may be 

considered in the evaluation of such a 

competition. Interest parties are 

encouraged to provide responses to the 

following questions or other topics 

relevant to a WEC Prize. 

• What administrative resources are 

required to design, promote, and 

implement a prize challenge? 

• How could a challenge be 

structured to efficiently, timely, and 

adequately allow comparison of the 

various technologies and techniques 

that may be applied to WEC? 

• How can a judging panel be secured 

for multiple phases? 

• Is the sample challenge structure, 

with multiple stages, too lengthy or 

complex that some potential 

competitors may not participate? Does 

offering seed funding at an early stage 

incentivize competitors where they 

otherwise would not compete? 

• What distribution of funding is 

appropriate for administrative costs, 

seed funding, and prize? Should seed 

funding be given, or should there 

instead be a larger winning prize, or 

first, second and third place prizes? 

• What criteria should be used to 

evaluate proposed WEC designs and 

WEC performance? 

Public Participation 

Webinar and Comments Instructions: 

The webinar will be held on Thursday, 

July 18, 2013 from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 

p.m. EST. Webinar attendees are 

encouraged to RSVP to 

WECworkshopweb@go.doe.gov by 

Monday, July 15, 2013. In addition, 

entities are welcomed to provide an 

additional written response to 

WECworkshopweb@go.doe.gov by 5:00 

p.m. EST on Thursday, July 25, 2013. 

Written responses may be submitted 

electronically or by postal mail and 

must be five pages or less in length. 

Electronic responses must be provided 

as attachments (in Microsoft Word or 

Adobe PDF format). The subject line 

should read ‘‘Wave Energy Converter 

Prize Administration (insert nameorganization)’’. One inch margins and 

12 point font should be used. Any entity 

providing a written response is 

requested to include the following 

information: Company/institutional 

name; individual contact information 

(mailing address, phone number, email 

address); facility location(s) (zip code); 

and area of expertise/interest. 

Disclaimer and Important Notes: The 

notice is issued solely for information 

and FOA planning purposes; the notice 

and webinar do not constitute a formal 

solicitation for proposals or abstracts. 

Your response to this notice and 

responses provided through the webinar 

will be treated as information only. In 

accordance with the Federal Acquisition 

Regulations, 48 C.F.R. 15.201(e), 

responses to this notice including those 

provided through the webinar are not 

offers and cannot be accepted by the 

Government to form a binding contract. 

DOE will not provide reimbursement for 

costs incurred in responding to this 

notice. Any of the information 

contained in this notice is subject to 

change. Any amounts proposed for 

funding are subject to the availability of 

Congressional appropriations. 

DOE may or may not decide at a later 

date to issue a FOA or other type of 

solicitation based on consideration of 

the input received from this notice or 

the webinar, and there is no guarantee 

that future funding opportunities or 

other activities will be undertaken as a 

result of this notice or the webinar. 

Because information received in 

response to this notice and during the 

webinar may be used to structure future 

funding opportunities and/or may 

otherwise be made available to the 

public, respondents are strongly advised 

to not include any information in their 

responses that might be considered 

business-sensitive, proprietary, or 

otherwise confidential. If, however, a 

respondent chooses to submit businesssensitive, proprietary, or otherwise 

confidential information, it must be 

clearly and conspicuously marked as 

such in the response pursuant to the 

instructions below. 

In order to avoid any possible conflict 

with future funding opportunities, DOE 

will not reply to any respondent 

questions or comments received after 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Notices 40135 

the closure of the submission period 

specified in the DATES section. 

Respondents are advised that DOE is 

under no obligation to acknowledge 

receipt of the information received or 

provide feedback to respondents with 

respect to any information submitted 

under this notice or through the 

webinar. Responses to this notice do not 

bind DOE to any further actions related 

to this topic. The DOE thanks you for 

your assistance and input. 

Confidential Business Information: 

Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person 

submitting information that he or she 

believes to be confidential and exempt 

by law from public disclosure should 

submit via email, postal mail, or hand 

delivery/courier two well-marked 

copies: One copy of the document 

marked ‘‘confidential’’ including all the 

information believed to be confidential, 

and one copy of the document marked 

‘‘non-confidential’’ with the information 

believed to be confidential deleted. 

Submit these documents via email or 

postal mail. DOE will make its own 

determination about the confidential 

status of the information and treat it 

according to its determination. 

Factors of interest to DOE when 

evaluating requests to treat submitted 

information as confidential include: (1) 

A description of the items; (2) whether 

and why such items are customarily 

treated as confidential within the 

industry; (3) whether the information is 

generally known by or available from 

other sources; (4) whether the 

information has previously been made 

available to others without obligation 

concerning its confidentiality; (5) an 

explanation of the competitive injury to 

the submitting person which would 

result from public disclosure; (6) when 

such information might lose its 

confidential character due to the 

passage of time; and (7) why disclosure 

of the information would be contrary to 

the public interest. 

It is DOE’s policy that all comments 

may be included in a public docket, 

without change and as received, 

including any personal information 

provided in the comments (except 

information deemed to be exempt from 

public disclosure). 

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 27, 

2013. 

Jose Zayas, 

Director, Wind and Water Power Technologies 

Office, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy, Department of Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2013–15967 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER10–2179–019; 

ER10–2181–019; ER10–2182–019. 

Applicants: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear 

Power Plant, LLC, Nine Mile Point 

Nuclear Station, LLC, R.E. Ginna 

Nuclear Power Plant, LLC. 

Description: Notice of Non-Material 

Change in Status of Calvert Cliffs 

Nuclear Power Plant, LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5103. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–2560–000; 

ER11–3156–000. 

Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 

Description: Refund Report in Docket 

Nos. ER11–2560 and ER11–3156 to be 

effective N/A. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5066. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1206–001. 

Applicants: PacifiCorp. 

Description: OATT Revised Schedules 

3 and 3A Deficiency Filing to be 

effective 6/1/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/20/13. 

Accession Number: 20130620–5139. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1737–000. 

Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, 

Inc. 

Description: 1636R10 Kansas Electric 

Power Cooperative, Inc. NITSA and 

NOA to be effective 6/1/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5039. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1738–000. 

Applicants: Alcoa Power Generating 

Inc. 

Description: Market-Based Rate Tariff 

Revisions to be effective 6/21/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5041. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1739–000. 

Applicants: Alcoa Power Marketing 

LLC. 

Description: Market-Based Rate Tariff 

Revisions to be effective 6/21/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5042. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1740–000. 

Applicants: Wisconsin Public Service 

Corporation. 

Description: Revised BAOCA between 

WPSC and WEPCO to be effective 6/21/ 

2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5050. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1741–000. 

Applicants: Upper Peninsula Power 

Company. 

Description: Revised BAAOCA 

Between UPPCO and WEPCO to be 

effective 6/21/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5054. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1742–000. 

Applicants: New England Power Pool 

Participants Committee, ISO New 

England Inc. 

Description: MR1 Clarifications to 

Full Inte. Rules for Price-Res. DemandNet Supply to be effective 8/21/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5055. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1743–000. 

Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 

Description: Compliance Filing in 

Docket Nos. ER11–2560 and ER11–3156 

to be effective 3/1/2012. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5063. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1744–000. 

Applicants: DPL Energy, LLC. 

Description: Rate Schedule No. 3 to be 

effective 6/21/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5067. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1745–000. 

Applicants: GenOn Bowline, LLC. 

Description: Notice of Succession to 

be effective 6/24/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5070. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1746–000. 

Applicants: GenOn Marsh Landing, 

LLC. 

Description: Notice of Succession to 

be effective 6/24/2013. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5086. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following open access 

transmission tariff filings: 

Docket Numbers: OA13–6–000. 

Applicants: Alcoa Power Generating 

Inc. 

Description: Request for Waiver of 

Alcoa Power Generating Inc. 

Filed Date: 6/21/13. 

Accession Number: 20130621–5094. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/13. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system by 

clicking on the links or querying the 

docket number. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES