58292 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 185 / Friday, September 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

inspection Subtasks, of the IP and HP 

compressor shafts listed by part number and 

serial number in Table 1 of this AD before 

exceeding the compliance period specified in 

Table 1 of this AD. 

(2) Guidance on full and focused 

inspections and acceptance limits can be 

found in the current, applicable RR engine 

manual and RR Alert Non-Modification 

Service Bulletin (NMSB) RB.211–72–AG086. 

TABLE 1—LIST OF AFFECTED SHAFTS

Engine series Affected component Part no. Shaft serial no. 

Compliance period 

(flight cycles in 

service after 

December 4, 2008) 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK24100 MW0115238 750 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–4 HP Compressor Shaft ............................................ FK32580 MW0115512 750 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–4 HP Compressor Shaft ............................................ FK32580 MW0004708 2000 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–4 HP Compressor Shaft ............................................ FK32580 MW00063868 2500 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK24100 DN65507 2500 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK24100 DN65158 2500 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–4 HP Compressor Shaft ............................................ FK32580 MW0125467 3500 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–4 HP Compressor Shaft ............................................ FW11590 DN65189 3500 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK24100 MW0091518 3500

Trent 800 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK24100 MW0126365 3500

Trent 800 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK24100 DN66422 4750 

Trent 800 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK24100 MW0203314 4750

Trent 700 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK22279 DN63228 3250 

Trent 700 ........................... 1–8 IP Compressor Shaft .............................................. FK26048 MW0026046 4500

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Engine Certification 

Office, FAA, has the authority to approve 

AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Related Information 

(g) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2009–0021 (Corrected February 9, 

2009), dated February 6, 2009, and RR Alert 

NMSB RB.211–72–AG086, for related 

information. 

(h) Contact James Lawrence, Aerospace 

Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, 

Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New 

England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 

01803; e-mail: james.lawrence@faa.gov; 

telephone (781) 238–7176; fax (781) 238– 

7199, for more information about this AD. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(i) None. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

September 17, 2010. 

Robert J. Ganley, 

Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23831 Filed 9–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 47 

[Docket No. FAA–2008–0188; Amdt. No. 47– 

29A] 

RIN 2120–AI89 

Re-Registration and Renewal of 

Aircraft Registration; OMB Approval of 

Information Collection; Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; approval of 

information collection; correction. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting the 

notification of the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) approval of 

information collection requirements 

contained in the ‘‘Re-Registration and 

Renewal of Aircraft Registration’’ final 

rule. The final rule was published on 

July 20, 2010. The notification of OMB 

approval of information collection was 

published on August 30, 2010. This 

document corrects the OMB approval 

expiration date referenced in the August 

30, 2010, notification. 

DATES: The final rule, including the 

information collection requirements in 

part 47, published July 20, 2010, at 75 

FR 41968, and August 20, 2010, at 75 FR 

52859, will become effective on October 

1, 2010. The FAA received OMB 

approval for the information collection 

requirements on August 16, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

G. Bent, Civil Aviation Registry, Mike 

Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 

South MacArthur Boulevard, Oklahoma 

City, OK 73169; telephone: (405) 954– 

4331. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 20, 2010, the FAA published 

the final rule ‘‘Re-Registration and 

Renewal of Aircraft Registration’’ (75 FR 

41968). 

The final rule contained information 

collection requirements in part 47 that 

had not yet been approved by OMB at 

the time of publication. In accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act, the 

FAA submitted a copy of the new 

information collection requirements to 

OMB for its review. OMB approved the 

collection on August 16, 2010, and 

assigned the information collection 

OMB Control Number 2120–0729, 

which expires on February 29, 2012. In 

the notification of OMB approval 

document that was published on August 

30, 2010, the FAA incorrectly stated that 

the expiration date was February 29, 

2010. The FAA also incorrectly 

referenced docket number FAA–2008– 

0118 instead of docket number FAA– 

2008–0188. The FAA also inadvertently 

included references to parts 13 and 91 

in the heading of the document; 

however, parts 13 and 91 did not 

contain information collection 

requirements. 

In final rule FR Doc. 2010–21561 

published on August 30, 2010 (75 FR 

52859), make the following corrections: 

Corrections to Preamble 

■ 1. On page 52859, in the second 

column, in the third line of the heading, 

remove ‘‘14 CFR Parts 13, 47, and 91’’ 

and add in its place ‘‘14 CFR Part 47.’’ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 185 / Friday, September 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 58293 

1FERC Staff, Staff Findings on Capacity 

Reassignment (2010), available at http:// 

www.ferc.gov (Staff Report). 

2Promoting Wholesale Competition Through 

Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission 

Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded 

Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities, 

Order No. 888, 61 FR 21540 (May 10, 1996), FERC 

Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,036, at 31,696 (1996), order on 

reh’g, Order No. 888–A, 62 FR 12274 (March 14, 

1997), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,048 (1997), order 

on reh’g, Order No. 888–B, 81 FERC ¶ 61,248 

(1997), order on reh’g, Order No. 888–C, 82 FERC 

¶ 61,046 (1998), aff’d in relevant part sub nom. 

Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. FERC, 

225 F.3d 667 (DC Cir. 2000), aff’d sub nom. New 

York v. FERC, 535 U.S. 1 (2002). 

■ 2. On page 52859, in the second 

column, in the fourth line of the 

heading, remove ‘‘FAA–2008–0118’’ and 

add in its place ‘‘FAA–2008–0188.’’ 

■ 3. On page 52859, in the second 

column, in the fifth line of the heading, 

remove ‘‘13–34, 47–29, and 91–318’’ and 

add in its place ‘‘47–29.’’ 

■ 4. On page 52859, in the third column, 

in the second paragraph under 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the 

twelfth line, remove ‘‘February 29, 2010’’ 

and add in its place ‘‘February 29, 2012.’’ 

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 

20, 2010. 

Dennis R. Pratte, II, 

Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23964 Filed 9–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

18 CFR Part 35 

[Docket No. RM10–22–000; Order No. 739] 

Promoting a Competitive Market for 

Capacity Reassignment 

September 20, 2010. 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission lifts the price 

cap for all electric transmission 

customers reassigning transmission 

capacity based on the Commission’s 

experience to date and a two-year study, 

released April 15, 2010. The removal of 

the price cap is intended to help 

facilitate the development of a market 

for electric transmission capacity 

reassignments as a competitive 

alternative to transmission capacity 

acquired directly from the transmission 

owner. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will 

become effective September 24, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurel Hyde (Technical Information), 

Office of Energy Market Regulation, 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502– 

8146. 

A. Cory Lankford (Legal Information), 

Office of the General Counsel, Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426, (202) 502–6711. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, 

Chairman; Marc Spitzer, Philip D. Moeller, 

John R. Norris, and Cheryl A. LaFleur. 

Paragraph 

Nos. 

I. Background .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 

II. Discussion .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 

A. Removal of the Price Cap .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 

1. Comments ............................................................................................................................................................................. 15 

2. Commission Determination ................................................................................................................................................. 25 

a. Removal of the Price Cap ............................................................................................................................................. 25 

b. Implementation of the Requirement ............................................................................................................................ 37 

B. Non-Rate Reforms to Promote Secondary Market .................................................................................................................... 39 

1. NOPR Proposal ..................................................................................................................................................................... 39 

2. Comments ............................................................................................................................................................................. 40 

3. Commission Determination ................................................................................................................................................. 43 

III. Information Collection Statement .................................................................................................................................................... 44 

IV. Environmental Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................... 48 

V. Regulatory Flexibility Act ................................................................................................................................................................. 49 

VI. Document Availability ..................................................................................................................................................................... 50 

VII. Effective Date and Congressional Notification .............................................................................................................................. 53 

1. Based on the Commission’s 

experience to date and a two-year study, 

released April 15, 2010,1 the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission in this 

Final Rule makes permanent the lifting 

of price caps for transmission customers 

reassigning electric transmission 

capacity. This action is intended to 

facilitate the development of a market 

for electric transmission capacity 

reassignments as a competitive 

alternative to primary transmission 

capacity. 

I. Background 

2. In Order No. 888, the Commission 

concluded that a transmission 

provider’s pro forma Open Access 

Transmission Tariff (OATT) must 

permit explicitly the voluntary 

reassignment of all or part of a holder’s 

firm point-to-point capacity rights to 

any eligible customer.2 The Commission 

also found that allowing holders of firm 

transmission capacity rights to reassign 

that transmission capacity would help 

parties manage the financial risks 

associated with their long-term 

commitment, reduce the market power 

of transmission providers by enabling 

customers to compete, and foster 

efficient transmission capacity 

allocation. 

3. With respect to the appropriate rate 

for transmission capacity reassignment, 

the Commission concluded it could not 

permit reassignments at market-based 

rates because it was unable to determine 

that the market for reassigned 

transmission capacity was sufficiently 

competitive so that resellers would not 

be able to exert market power. Instead, 

the Commission capped the rate at the 

highest of: (1) The original transmission 

rate charged to the purchaser (assignor); 

(2) the transmission provider’s 

maximum stated firm transmission rate 

in effect at the time of the reassignment; 

or (3) the assignor’s own opportunity 

costs capped at the cost of expansion 

(price cap). The Commission further 

explained that opportunity cost pricing 

had been permitted at ‘‘the higher of 

embedded costs or legitimate and 

verifiable opportunity costs, but not the 

sum of the two (i.e., ‘or’ pricing is 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES