Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 1997 / Proposed Rules 61927

Citation

The authority citation for these

special conditions is as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40113, 44701,

44702, and 44704; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17;

and 14 CFR 11.28 and 11.29(b).

The Proposed Special Conditions

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration proposes the following

special conditions as part of the type

certification basis for the EXTRA

Flugzeugbau GmbH EA–400 airplane

design.

Heat Capability of Engine Mount and

Fuselage Connection Joint

(a) Modify the airworthiness

standards given in 14 CFR part 23,

POWERPLANT FIRE PROTECTION,

Nacelle areas behind firewalls

(§ 23.1182), by making the most critical

composite engine-mount attachment

ineffective (assumed destroyed by heat).

Then, for 15 minutes, apply an

additional flame test of 500°C (932°F) to

the next most structurally critical

engine-mount of those remaining. The

flame shall encompass the whole

engine-mount structural attach fitting.

Conductive heat will affect the metallic

and composite joint structural capability

beyond the firewall. Test the joint

structural capability with these

simultaneous limit load conditions

(under these conditions, the engine

shall remain attached to the airplane):

(1) The combined thrust, torque and

gyroscopic loads resulting from the

engine and propeller at maximum

continuous power for the first 5

minutes, and

(2) The airplane normal inertial limit

loads that result from the following:

(i) A maneuver load factor equal to

that obtained from a constant altitude

30° bank, combined with

(ii) The positive and negative vertical

design gust load factors that occur at the

design maneuvering speed and the

minimum flying weight, and

(iii) A factor-of-safety equal to one.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on

November 6, 1997.

Mary Ellen A. Schutt,

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,

Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 97–30496 Filed 11–19–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97–AWP–10]

Proposed Amendment of Class E

Airspace; Tracy, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This notice proposes to

amend the Class E airspace area at

Tracy, CA. The establishment of a

Global Positioning System (GPS)

Standard Instrument Approach

Procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 11,

a GPS SIAP to RWY 25, and a GPS SIAP

to RWY 29 at Tracy Municipal Airport

has made this proposal necessary.

Additional controlled airspace

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth is needed

to contain aircraft executing the

approach and departure procedures at

Tracy Municipal Airport. The intended

effect of this proposal is to provide

adequate controlled airspace for

Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations

at Tracy Municipal Airport, Tracy, CA.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before December 29, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Attn:

Manager, Airspace Branch, AWP–520,

Docket No. 97–AWP–10, Air Traffic

Division, 15000 Aviation Boulevard,

Lawndale, California, 90261.

The official docket may be examined

in the Office of the Assistant Chief

Counsel, Western Pacific Region,

Federal Aviation Administration, Room

6007, 15000 Aviation Boulevard,

Lawndale, California, 90261.

An informal docket may also be

examined during normal business hours

at the Office of the Manager, Airspace

Branch, Air Traffic Division at the above

address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry Tonish, Airspace Specialist,

Airspace Branch, AWP–520, Air Traffic

Division, Western-Pacific Region,

Federal Aviation Administration, 15000

Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale,

California, 90261, telephone (310) 725–

6531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views,

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related

aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify the

airspace docket number and be

submitted in triplicate to the address

listed above. Commenters wishing the

FAA to acknowledge receipt of their

comments on the notice must submit

with the comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the

following statement is made:

‘‘Comments to Airspace Docket No. 97–

AWP–10.’’ The postcard will be date/

time stamped and returned to the

commenter. All communications

received on or before the specified

closing date for comments will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposal contained

in this notice may be changed in light

of comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination in the Airspace Branch, Air

Traffic Division, 15000 Aviation

Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261,

both before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRM

Any person may obtain a copy of this

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, Airspace

Branch, 15000 Aviation Boulevard,

Lawndale, California 90261.

Communications must identify the

notice number of this NPRM. Persons

interested in being placed on a mailing

list for future NPRM’s should also

request a copy of Advisory Circular No.

11–2A, which describes the application

procedures.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend

the Class E airspace area at Tracy, CA.

The establishment of a GPS RWY 11

SIAP, GPS RWY 25 SIAP, and GPS RWY

29 SIAP at Tracy Municipal Airport has

made this proposal necessary.

Additional controlled airspace

extending upward from 700 feet above

the surface is needed to contain aircraft

executing the approach and departures

procedures at Tracy Municipal Airport.

The intended effect of this proposal is

to provide adequate controlled airspace

for aircraft executing the GPS RWY 11
61928 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 1997 / Proposed Rules

1The percentage of elemental fluoride in any

compound is determined by dividing the molecular

weight of fluoride (∼ 19 grams/mole) by the

molecular weight of the compound (e.g., the

molecular weight of sodium fluoride = 42 grams/

mole). Sodium fluoride contains 45% elemental

fluoride (19/42 × 100 = 45%).

2Numbers in brackets refer to documents listed

at the end of this notice.

SIAP, GPS RWY 25 SIAP, and GPS RWY

29 SIAP and other IFR operations at

Tracy Municipal Airport, Tracy, CA.

Class E airspace designations are

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA

Order 7400.E dated September 10, 1997,

and effective September 16, 1997, which

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class E airspace designation

listed in this document would be

published subsequently in this Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only invovles an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current.

Therefore, this proposed regulation—(1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this proposed rule

would not have a significant economic

impact on a substantial number of small

entities under the criteria of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as

follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E. O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9E, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated September 10, 1997, and effective

September 16, 1997, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AWP CA E5 Tracy, CA [Revised]

Tracy Municipal Airport, CA

(Lat. 37°41′15′′ N, long. 121°26′29′′ W)

Manteca VORTAC

(Lat. 37°50′01′′ N, long. 121°10′17′′ W)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile

radius of Tracy Municipal Airport and within

2.2 miles each side of the Manteca VORTAC

237° radial, extending from the 6.4-mile

radius to 4.9 miles southwest of the Manteca

VORTAC and within 1.8 miles each side of

the 117° bearing from the Tracy Municipal

Airport, extending from the 6.4-mile radius

to 8.4 miles southeast of the Tracy Municipal

Airport and within 1.8 miles each side of the

326° bearing from the Tracy Municipal

Airport, extending from the 6.4-miles radius

to 7.7 miles northwest of the Tracy

Municipal Airport, excluding that portion

within the Stockton, CA, Class E and

Livermore, CA, Class E airspace areas, and

excluding that airspace within Restricted

Area R2531A.

* * * * *

Issued in Los Angeles, California, on

November 7, 1997.

Michael Lammes,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Western-Pacific Region.

[FR Doc. 97–30353 Filed 11–19–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY

COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 1700

Requirements for Child-Resistant

Packaging; Household Products With

More Than 50 mg of Elemental Fluoride

and More Than 0.5 Percent Elemental

Fluoride; and Modification of

Exemption for Oral Prescription Drugs

With Sodium Fluoride

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission is proposing

a rule to require child-resistant (‘‘CR’’)

packaging for household products

containing more than the equivalent of

50 mg of elemental fluoride and more

than the equivalent of 0.5 percent

elemental fluoride (on a weight-tovolume (‘‘w/v’’) or weight-to-weight

(‘‘w/w’’) basis). Examples of such

products are some rust removers, toilet

cleaners, metal cleaners and etching

products. Dental products, such as

toothpaste, contain lower levels of

fluoride and would not be affected. For

consistency, the Commission is also

proposing to modify the oral

prescription drug exemption for sodium

fluoride preparations. Instead of

allowing drugs with no more than 264

mg of sodium fluoride per package to be

in non-CR packaging as the current rule

does, the Commission proposes to allow

such drugs with only 50 mg or less of

the equivalent of elemental fluoride

(110 mg or less of sodium fluoride) per

package and no more than the

equivalent of 0.5 percent elemental

fluoride on a w/v or w/w basis. The

Commission has preliminarily

determined that child-resistant

packaging is necessary to protect

children under 5 years of age from

serious personal injury and serious

illness resulting from handling or

ingesting a toxic amount of elemental

fluoride. The Commission takes this

action under the authority of the Poison

Prevention Packaging Act of 1970.

DATES: Comments on the proposal

should be submitted no later than

February 3, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

mailed to the Office of the Secretary,

Consumer Product Safety Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20207, or delivered to

the Office of the Secretary, Consumer

Product Safety Commission, Room 502,

4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda,

Maryland 20814–4408, telephone

(301)504–0800. Comments may also be

filed by telefacsimile to (301) 504–0127

or by email to cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline Ferrante, Ph.D., Division of

Health Sciences, Directorate for

Epidemiology and Health Sciences,

Consumer Product Safety Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20207; telephone

(301)504–0477 ext. 1199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

1. Household Products Containing

Fluoride

Many types of household products

may contain fluoride in one form or

another. Fluorides are ingredients in

cleaning products for metal, tile, brick,

cement, wheels, radiators, siding,

toilets, ovens and drains. Fluorides are

also found in rust and water stain

removers, silver solder and other

welding fluxes, etching compounds,

laundry sour, air conditioner coil

cleaners and floor polishes. The

fluorides that may be ingredients in

these products and are potentially toxic

are hydrofluoric acid (‘‘HF’’),

ammonium bifluoride, ammonium

fluoride, potassium bifluoride, sodium

bifluoride, sodium fluoride and sodium

fluosilicate.1 [3] 2

Many dental products also contain

fluorides, but at lower levels.