alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**EXHIBIT      32.6**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   August                    14, 2007 | By:    | /s/                    Thomas G. Sategna          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |   | Thomas                    G. Sategna              |
|                                                      |   | Vice                    President,                |
|                                                      |   | Controller                    and Treasurer       |
|                                                      |   | Texas-New                    Mexico Power Company |
Exhibit 99.4

 

**Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cenovus Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ivor M. Ruste, Executive Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |                                                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    | /s/   Ivor M. Ruste                                           |   |
|   | Ivor   M. Ruste                                               |
|   | Executive   Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

February 25, 2011

 

----
#### CASTRO v. CASTRO et al.

No. 39115.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Rehearing- Denied Feb. 26, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
----

----

----

|                  EXHIBIT 15.4               CONSENT OF PAUL A. GATES               c/o RungePincockMinarco Limited               165 South Union Blvd, Suite 950, Denver, CO 80228-2226  | Runge, Inc. dbaRungePincockMinarco 165 S. Union BoulevardSuite 950Lakewood, Colorado  80228 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| RE: | Tasman Metals Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the Year Ended August 31, 2013 (the “2013 MD&A”). |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1.       | The amended and restated technical report entitled “Amended and RestatedPreliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Norra Kärr (REE - Y - Zr) Deposit, Gränna, Sweden” dated July 9, 2013, which the undersigned has prepared (the "Norra Kärr PEA Report"). |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
*This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 **The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA STEFANOVA,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 06-70547

Agency No. A072-398-271

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 12, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: SILVERMAN, FISHER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Maria Stefanova petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA) denial of her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252 and we deny the petition.

FILED

MAY 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

First, Stefanova disputes the BIA’s determinations that she failed to establish

that she had been subject to past persecution and that she failed to establish a wellfounded fear of future persecution. These are factual findings, see Prasad v. INS,

47 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir. 1995), and we must uphold them unless “the evidence

compels a different result,” Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 891 (9th

Cir. 2002). 

Stefanova’s difficulties at work, her encounters with the Bulgarian police

and the other experiences she credibly described do not compel a finding that she

suffered past persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.

2003) (“Persecution . . . is an extreme concept that does not include every sort of

treatment our society regards as offensive.”) (internal quotation marks omitted); cf.

id. at 1014-18 (holding that the record did not compel a finding of past persecution

when petitioner credibly testified she had been harassed and fired at work,

“pushed,” and threatened with death). 

Nor does the record compel a finding that Stefanova’s subjectively genuine

fear of future persecution was objectively reasonable. Although members of

minority Christian denominations continue to face hardships in post-Communist

Bulgaria, the record does not compel a finding that those hardships rise to the level

of persecution on account of religion, and it therefore does not compel a finding
3

that Stefanova’s subjective fear of future persecution is objectively reasonable. See

Gormley v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2004). 

Finally, Stefanova claims that the Immigration Judge (IJ) failed to provide

her a “full and fair hearing of her claims and a reasonable opportunity to present

evidence on her behalf.” See Cinapian v. Holder, 567 F.3d 1067, 1073 (9th Cir.

2009) (quoting Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000)). The record

does not support that claim. The agency is presumed to have reviewed the

evidence before it, see Larita-Martinez v. INS, 220 F.3d 1092,1095-96 (9th Cir.

2000), and the BIA and IJ’s decisions are consistent with that presumption. Nor

does the record suggest that the IJ unduly rushed Stefanova or prevented her from

presenting witnesses or evidence. 

PETITION DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

ALISHA L. FORD, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 36 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue rephrased for clarity is 

(1) Did the Superior Court err in affirming the summary judgment order and 

holding that the insurer’s underinsured motorist coverage rejection form 

“specifically complies” with Subsection 1731(c) of the Motor Vehicle 

Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1731(c)?
#### Charles William MCCARTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-295.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Robert H. DeBRUHL, Dorothy A. DeBruhl and Allstate Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellants, v. Ronald J. MANNING, Appellee.

No. 70-420.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 5, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stephen R. Booher, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-33: OTS No. 3455]


Newport Federal Savings Bank, Newport, AR; Approval of Conversion 
Application

    Notice is hereby given that on November 7, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Newport Federal Savings Bank, Newport, Arkansas, to convert to the 
stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, and the Midwest Regional 
Office, 122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75039-
2010.

    Dated: November 13, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30269 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD J.
THOMPSON
|                          



August 4, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1997 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1997

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the TRICARE program 
 for certain members of the Retired Reserve of the reserve components.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2021

   Mr. Johnson of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Phillips) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the TRICARE program 
 for certain members of the Retired Reserve of the reserve components.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TRICARE Fairness for National Guard 
and Reserve Retirees Act''.

SEC. 2. TRICARE FOR MEMBERS OF THE RETIRED RESERVE.

    (a) Adjustment of Eligibility.--Paragraph (2) of section 1074(b) of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a member or former member 
eligible for retired pay for non-regular service under chapter 1223 of 
this title who is under 60 years of age unless such member or former 
member is in receipt of such pay (or would be in receipt of such pay 
but for section 5304 or 5305 of title 38).''.
    (b) TRICARE Retired Reserve.--Section 1076e(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``who is qualified for a 
        non-regular retirement at age 60 under chapter 1223 of this 
        title, but is not age 60,'' and inserting ``described in 
        paragraph (3)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) A member of the Retired Reserve of a reserve component of the 
armed forces is described in this paragraph if the member--
            ``(A) is qualified for a non-regular retirement at age 60 
        under chapter 1223 of this title;
            ``(B) is not age 60; and
            ``(C) is not in receipt of retired pay under such chapter, 
        unless the member is not in receipt of such retired pay due to 
        the application of section 5304 or 5305 of title 38.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect January 1, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Daniel R. Lutz, Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel R. Lutz     
|                         |  |  |  | Daniel R. Lutz         
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

109)IV-C-75 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:57 AM Sheet 109 of 232 
P.2 

£ JEL \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

% PRO** 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

FES 22 . 

OFFICEOF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Dante B. Fascell 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Fascell: 

Thank you for passing along the comments of your 

constituents concerning EPA's proposal to require onboard 

refueling emission controls and proposed gasoline volatility 

regulations. Be assured that these comments will be considered 

in the next phase of our rulemaking process. We will also be 

placing them in the public dockets for the rulemaking. 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: -Docket A-87-11 

Docket A-85-21 

Prepared by: Form Letter:sal:2/17/88:"AL880652: ECTD - Ann Arbor, MI 

BCC: Region 04 

Congressional Liaison/Quinn 

AO/Deremer 

Docket A-87-11 and Docket A-85-21 c/o Jackie McManus
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5835-5836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of General Medical Science meeting:

    Committee Name: Minority Program Review Committee MARC, Minority 
Access to Research Careers Sub-Committee.
    Date: February 20-21, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.--adjournment.
    Place: Natcher Conference Center, 45 Center Drive--Conference 
Room C1/C2, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200.
    Contact Person: Richard I. Martinez, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIGMS, 45 Center Drive, Room 1AS-19G, Bethesda, MD 
20892-6200, 301-594-2849.
    Purpose: To review institutional research training grant 
applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The 
discussions of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority

[[Page 5836]]

Access Research Careers [MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical 
Research Support [MBRS])

    Dated: January 31, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-3078 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Bdcklayct·s & Allied Craftsmen Local No.7 Pension Plan 

Checklist Item #04 

Does the application include a statement, signed by an authorized trustee on behalf of the board of 

tn1stccs, acknowledging that the application and the application's supporting material will be 

publicly disclosed on the Treasut:y Depm1ment's website? Sec section 2.04. 

Document 4.1 provides a statement, signed by an authorized tmstee on behalf of the Board of 

Tmstccs of the Pension Plan, acknowledging that the application and the application's supporting 

materials will be publicly disclosed on the U.S. Department of the Treasury's website. 

4. t 
2.04 Public Disclosure 

Document4.1 

Public Disclosut·c Statement 

The following is a copy of the statement, si!:,'llcd by an authorized tntstee on behalf of the 

Board of Trustees of the Pension Plan, acknowledging that the application and the application's 

suppOfting materials will be publicly disclosed on the U.S. Department of the Treasury's website .. 

For the public disclosure statement, see the following page. 

4.2 
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63350-63351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food And Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97F-0468]


Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that Ciba 
Specialty Chemicals Corp., has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of 
tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl)phosphite by removing the restrictions on 
the temperature of use in low density polyethylene films of thickness 
greater than 0.051 millimeter (mm) (0.002 inch (in)), provided that the 
film does not contain a total of tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl)phosphite 
in excess of 0.062 milligram (mg) per in<SUP>2</SUP> of the food-
contact surface.

DATES: Written comments on petitioner's environmental assessment by 
December 29, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Branch

[[Page 63351]]

(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, 
Rockville, MD 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vir D. Anand, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-216),  Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3081.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 8B4563) has been filed by Ciba Specialty 
Chemicals Corp., c/o Keller and Heckman, 1001 G St. NW., suite 500 
West, Washington, DC 20001. The petition proposes to amend the food 
additive regulations in Sec. 178.2010 Antioxidants and/or stabilizers 
for polymers (21 CFR 178.2010) to provide for the safe use of tris(2,4-
di-tert-butylphenyl)phosphite by removing the restriction on the 
temperature of use in low density polyethylene films of thickness 
greater than 0.051 mm (0.002 in), provided that the film does not 
contain a total of tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl)phosphite in excess of 
0.062 mg per in<SUP>2</SUP> of the food-contact surface.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(i) that this action is 
of the type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 97-31149 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Item 77D - DWS Dreman High Return Equity
Fund (a series of DWS Value Series, Inc.)

At a meeting held April 1, 2009, the Board of
Directors of DWS Dreman High Return Equity
Fund, a series of DWS Value Series, Inc., approved
the termination of Dreman Value Management, LLC
("DVM"), as the fund's subadvisor.  Effective on or
about June 1, 2009, Deutsche Investment
Management Americas Inc. (the "Advisor") assumed
all day-to-day advisory responsibilities for the fund
that were previously delegated to DVM.

The fund's Board also approved a name change to
DWS Strategic Value Fund, effective on June 1,
2009.

The fund's Board also approved certain changes to
the fund's investment strategy as follows:

Portfolio management seeks to invest in a diversified
portfolio normally consisting of approximately
60-80 stocks.
E:\Electronic Working Files\NSAR\2009\4-30-09\DWS Advisor
Funds\03-Exhibits\Exhibit 77D CFI.doc