alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RICKY PAUL LOMBARDI

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2935

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed November 1, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. J. Scott Duncan , Judge

.

Ricky Paul Lombardi , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Tayo Popoola, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form  10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger
S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





May
15, 2009








/s/ Roger N. Marcus


Roger
S. Marcus


Chief
Executive Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Treasury approves Wyoming’s plan to invest $70.5 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Wyoming

 

▪ Program Summary: $70.5 million for Broadband Infrastructure (64% of CPF allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 11,700 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: The Connect Wyoming grant program

is a competitive grant program designed to fund last mile

broadband infrastructure projects in areas throughout the

state that currently lack access to internet at speeds of

100/20 Mbps to facilitate access to work, education,

and health monitoring.

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

▪ Key State Contact: The Wyoming Business Council

Wyoming Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Wyoming, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve ~20% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1948 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities 

relating to the collective bargaining of employees in the 

Veterans Health Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1948 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Employee Fairness 

3 Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON COLLECTIVE 

5 BARGAINING OF EMPLOYEES OF THE VET6 ERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7422 of title 38, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d); and 

10 (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub11 section (b). 

12 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The amendments 

13 made by subsection (a) may not be construed to affect 

14 the authorities of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs re15 garding incentive pay and expedited hiring under section 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1948 RDS

1 706 of title 38, United States Code, or other similar provi2 sions of law. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 15, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 

By KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Deputy Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Request for Information Dennis Austin (FAA-2015-3083) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Austin: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−3083). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition.

 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove 

closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response 

date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by November 17, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

 

FAA Office of Rulemaking 

Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:26 AM 

To: dennis@blueskylens.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997             JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         115,711                 115,711
<SECURITIES>                                    60,384                  60,384
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,128                 102,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               389,226                 389,226
<PP&E>                                         366,573                 366,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 831,273                 831,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,932                 118,932
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     669,527                 669,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   831,273                 831,273
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               210,975                 633,960
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  234,987                 803,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,667)               (161,852)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,434)                (59,969)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,233)               (101,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,233)               (101,883)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)                  (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)                  (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
WILLIS ALPHONSO

REDDICK

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1041

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell L. Healey , Judge

.

Willis Alphonso Reddick, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Att orney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32





Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the “Act”) and Rule 15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), each of the undersigned, Renee Gilmore, Principal Executive Officer of Firemans Contractors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Nikolay Frolov, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 28, 2011


By:
/s/ Renee GilmoreRenee GilmorePrincipal Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)By:
/s/ Nikolay FrolovNikolay FrolovChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Willie Jean FERRELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-666.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 2, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1978.

*844Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant was charged by an information and convicted for committing an aggravated battery and for the unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense, i. e., the aggravated battery. Pursuant to the jury’s verdict, the trial court entered its judgment of conviction and imposed the sentence which appellant now appeals.

In the trial court, appellant unsuccessfully moved to dismiss the information on the ground that it charged her with an aggravated battery, but neglected to include the essential elements of a battery. Appellant contends that such neglect resulted in the failure to charge her with a criminal offense under the laws of Florida. Appellant argues that, because of such failure, the trial court erred in not granting her motion to dismiss the information.

Our review of the record and the information compel us to agree with appellant’s contention. Count II of the information reads as follows:

> “And RICHARD E. GERSTEIN, State Attorney of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, prosecuting for the State of Florida, in the County of Dade, under oath, further information makes that, WILLIE JEAN FERRELL on the 27th day of MAY, 1976, in the County and State aforesaid, did unlawfully commit an aggravated battery upon NEIL McLEOD and in commission of said aggravated battery, did use a deadly weapon, to-wit: A PISTOL, in violation of 784.045(l)(b) Florida Statutes, contrary to the form of the Statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida.”

Because the information failed to affirmatively allege the essential elements of an aggravated battery, i. e., by failing to include the essential elements of a battery, it was reversible error for the trial court to deny her motion to dismiss the information. See, *State*v. *Beasley,*317 So.2d 750 (Fla.1975); *Gibbs v. Mayo,*81 So.2d 739 (Fla.1955); *Dowling v. State,*98 Fla. 523, 124 So. 12 (1929); *Catanese v. State,*251 So.2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.140(b) and 3.140(d)(1). We note that, in the instant case, the charge of the unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense must stand or fall in conjunction with the aggravated battery charge. Because the latter fell, so must the former. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction and sentence appealed are reversed.

Reversed.
### J. Based upon our review of the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in determining that appellant was not entitled to relief. NRS 34.724(2)(c) provides that a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus is the only remedy available to challenge the computation of time served, and therefore, a writ of mandamus is not available to challenge the application and calculation of appellant's statutory credits. Thus, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition for a writ of mandamus. 2 Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3
Hardesty Otakolt

- 4 j 4/ • ParragUirre

2 The district court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus on the merits, but should not have reached the merits of appellant's claim pursuant to NRS 34.724(2)(c). However, we affirm because the district court reached the right result in denying the petition. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970).

3 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) I947A 2
(A,„

### cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Nathanial Johnson Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 

### 3
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual Report of MyOtherCountryClub.com(the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael F. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





By:
/s/ Michael F. SmithName:
Michael F. SmithTitle:
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerDate:
May 17, 2011





This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
DECLARATION OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING THE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE

GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS TO IMPROVE INTERNATIONAL

TAX COMPLIANCE AND TO IMPLEMENT FATCA

At the signing today of the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America

and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus to Improve International Tax Compliance and to

Implement FATCA (hereinafter the "Agreement"), the representatives of the United States of

America and the Republic of Cyprus wish to confirm their understanding of the following:

With reference to paragraph 7 of Article 3 (Time and Manner of Exchange of Information)

of the Agreement

It is understood that subparagraph 1(b) of Article 28 of the Tax Convention between the United

States of America and the Republic of Cyprus, done at Nicosia on March 19, 1984, applies to all

information exchanged under the Agreement.

Signed at Nicosia, Cyprus, in duplicate, in the English language, this 2nd day of December, 2014.

A Greek language text is to be prepared which is to be considered equally official upon an

exchange of notes between the Participants confirming its conformity with the English language

text.

For the

United States of America

For the

Republic of C7r7„,,z,,,,-,
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1894 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1894

         For the relief of Stela Simeonova and Simeon Simeonov.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2021

Ms. Schakowsky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         For the relief of Stela Simeonova and Simeon Simeonov.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR STELA SIMEONOVA AND SIMEON 
              SIMEONOV.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Stela Simeonova and Simeon 
Simeonov shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Stela Simeonova and Simeon Simeonov 
enter the United States before the filing deadline specified in 
subsection (c), they shall be considered to have entered and remained 
lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment 
of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as 
of the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the applications for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the applications for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees, within 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Stela Simeonova and Simeon 
Simeonov, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by one, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Stela 
Simeonova and Simeon Simeonov shall not, by virtue of such 
relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Estelle Aaron, Appellant, v Great Bay Contracting, Inc., Respondent.

[736 NYS2d *359]*

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about March 19, 2001, which denied petitioner’s application to discharge or reduce respondent’s mechanic’s lien, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pertinent provisions of the parties’ contract governing respondent’s renovation of petitioner’s apartment provide for a final payment “on the date the job is completed and signed [off] by [petitioner’s] Architect,” with any disputes as to the quality of the work and whether or not it has been completed to be resolved solely and finally by petitioner’s architect. Respondent filed a notice of mechanic’s lien for an amount approximating the final payment specified in the contract, which lien petitioner seeks to discharge on the ground that the final payment is not due since her architect never signed off on the job. The application was properly denied since it does not appear from the face of the lien that it is invalid “by reason of the character of the labor *or*materials furnished” (Lien Law § 19 [6]) or for any other reason set forth in section 19 *(see, Matter of Supreme Plumbing Co. v Seadco Bldg. Corp.,*224 App Div 844). Rather, the validity of the lien plainly turns on a dispute as to whether respondent has completed the work required by the contract, and, accordingly, must await trial of the foreclosure action *(see, Care Sys. v Laramee,*155 AD2d 770, 771; *Matter of Atlantic Cement Co. v St. Lawrence Cement Co.,*22 AD2d 228). Nor should the lien be reduced on the basis of the contract clause providing damages for delay, which in petitioner’s view results in the lien being exaggerated. Although Lien Law § 39 provides that a willfully exaggerated lien is void, the issue of willful or fraudulent exaggeration is one that also ordinarily must be determined at the trial of the foreclosure action *(see, Coppola Gen. Contr. Corp. v Noble House Constr.,*224 AD2d 856). We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them unavailing. The best resolution of this matter is that there be a speedy trial, to which the parties committed themselves on oral agreement. Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Lerner, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.