Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules 3587 

PART 70—PROCEDURE AND 

ADMINISTRATION 

13. The authority citation for part 70 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 552: 26 U.S.C. 

4181, 4182, 5123, 5203, 5207, 5275, 5367, 

5415, 5504, 5555, 5684(a), 5741, 5761(b), 

5802, 6020, 6021, 6064, 6102, 6155, 6159, 

6201, 6203, 6204, 6301, 6303, 6311, 6313, 

6314, 6321, 6323, 6325, 6326, 6331–6343, 

6401–6404, 6407, 6416, 6423, 6501–6503, 

6511, 6513, 6514, 6532, 6601, 6602, 6611, 

6621, 6622, 6651, 6653, 6656–6658, 6665, 

6671, 6672, 6701, 6723, 6801, 6862, 6863, 

6901, 7011, 7101, 7102, 7121, 7122, 7207, 

7209, 7214, 7304, 7401, 7403, 7406, 7423, 

7424, 7425, 7426, 7429, 7430, 7432, 7502, 

7503, 7505, 7506, 7513, 7601–7606, 7608– 

7610, 7622, 7623, 7653, 7805. 

14. [The proposed amendatory 

instructions and the proposed 

regulatory text for part 70 are the same 

as the amendatory instructions and the 

amendatory regulatory text set forth in 

the temporary rule on this subject 

published in the Rules and Regulations 

section of this issue of the Federal 

Register.] 

Signed: June 2, 2010. 

Mary G. Ryan, 

Acting Administrator. 

Approved: August 18, 2010. 

Timothy E. Skud, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Tax, Trade, and 

Tariff Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1144 Filed 1–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–31–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 60 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0031; FRL–9255–2] 

RIN 2060–AQ46 

Standards of Performance for FossilFuel-Fired, Electric Utility, IndustrialCommercial-Institutional, and Small 

Industrial-Commercial-Institutional 

Steam Generating Units 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to amend 

the new source performance standards 

for electric utility steam generating units 

and industrial-commercial-institutional 

steam generating units. This action 

would amend the testing requirements 

for owners/operators of steam 

generating units that elect to install 

particulate matter continuous emission 

monitoring systems. It would also 

amend the opacity monitoring 

requirements for owners/operators of 

affected facilities subject to an opacity 

standard that are exempt from the 

requirement to install a continuous 

opacity monitoring system. In addition, 

this action would correct several 

editorial errors identified from previous 

rulemakings. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before February 22, 2011, 

unless a public hearing is requested by 

January 31, 2011. If a timely hearing 

request is submitted, the public hearing 

will be held on February 4, 2011 and we 

must receive written comments on or 

before March 7, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2005–0031, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov, or 

fellner.christian@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (202) 566–9744. 

• Mail: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. 

Please include a total of two copies. 

• Hand Delivery: In person or by 

courier, deliver comments to: EPA 

Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20004. Such deliveries 

are accepted only during the Docket’s 

normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays), and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. Please 

include a total of two copies. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2005– 

0031. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the EPA Docket Center, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC. The Public Reading 

Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

legal holidays. The telephone number 

for the Public Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742. 

Public Hearing: If a public hearing is 

requested, it will be held at 10 a.m. at 

the EPA Facility Complex in Research 

Triangle Park, North Carolina, or at an 

alternate site nearby. Contact Mr. 

Christian Fellner at 919–541–4003 to 

request a hearing, to request to speak at 

a public hearing, to determine if a 

hearing will be held, or to determine the 

hearing location. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Christian Fellner, Energy Strategies 

Group, Sector Policies and Programs 

Division (D243–01), U.S. EPA, Research 

Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone 

number (919) 541–4003, FAX number 

(919) 541–5450, electronic mail (e-mail) 

address: fellner.christian@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

information presented in this preamble 

is organized as follows: 

I. Why is EPA issuing this proposed 

rule? 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

III. Where can I get a copy of this 

document? 

IV. Why are we amending the rule? 

V. What amendments are we making to 

the rule? 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
3588 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

F. Executive Order 13175: 

Consultation and Coordination 

With Indian Tribal Governments 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection 

of Children From Environmental 

Health Risks and Safety Risks 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

I. Why is EPA issuing this proposed 

rule? 

In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section 

of this Federal Register, we have also 

published for the new source 

performance standards for electric 

utility steam generating units and 

industrial-commercial-institutional 

steam generating units a direct final 

action amending the rule with the 

identical regulatory language proposed 

by this action because we view these 

amendments as a noncontroversial 

action and anticipate no adverse 

comment. We have explained our 

reasons for this action in the preamble 

to the direct final rule. 

If we receive no adverse comment by 

February 22, 2011, we will not take 

further action on this proposed rule. If 

we receive adverse comment, we will 

withdraw the amendments in the direct 

final rule or certain amendments in the 

direct final rule and those amendments 

will not take effect. We would address 

all public comments in any subsequent 

final rule based on this proposed rule. 

We do not intend to institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. For further 

information, please see the information 

provided in the ADDRESSES section of 

this document. 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

The regulated categories and entities 

potentially affected by this proposed 

rule include, but are not limited to, the 

following: 

Category NAICS1 Examples of regulated entities 

Industry .............................................. 221112 .................................. Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units. 

Federal Government .......................... 22112 .................................... Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units owned by the Federal Government. 

State/local/tribal government ............. 22112 .................................... Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units owned by municipalities. 

921150 .................................. Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units located in Indian 

Country. 

Any industrial, commercial, or institutional facility using a steam generating unit as defined in 60.40b or 

60.40c.

211 ........................................ Extractors of crude petroleum and natural gas. 

321 ........................................ Manufacturers of lumber and wood products. 

322 ........................................ Pulp and paper mills. 

325 ........................................ Chemical manufacturers. 

324 ........................................ Petroleum refiners and manufacturers of coal products. 

316, 326, 339 ........................ Manufacturers of rubber and miscellaneous plastic products. 

331 ........................................ Steel works, blast furnaces. 

332 ........................................ Electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring. 

336 ........................................ Manufacturers of motor vehicle parts and accessories. 

221 ........................................ Electric, gas, and sanitary services. 

622 ........................................ Health services. 

611 ........................................ Educational Services. 

1 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code. 

This table is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

regulated by this proposed rule. To 

determine whether your facility is 

regulated by this proposed rule, you 

should examine the applicability 

criteria in § 60.40, § 60.40Da, § 60.40b, 

or § 60.40c of 40 CFR part 60. If you 

have any questions regarding the 

applicability of this proposed rule to a 

particular entity, contact the person 

listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

III. Where can I get a copy of this 

document? 

In addition to the docket, an 

electronic copy of this proposed action 

will be available on the Worldwide Web 

(WWW) through the Technology 

Transfer Network (TTN). Following 

signature, a copy of this proposed action 

will be posted on the TTN’s policy and 

guidance page for newly proposed or 

promulgated rules at the following 

address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. 

The TTN provides information and 

technology exchange in various areas of 

air pollution control. 

IV. Why are we amending the rule? 

On January 28, 2009, EPA 

promulgated amendments to the 

performance standards for steam 

generating units to add compliance, 

recordkeeping, and reporting 

requirements for owners and operators 

of certain affected facilities. 

Subsequently, EPA received a petition 

for reconsideration which it granted. 

The petitioner that submitted the 

petition for reconsideration also filed a 

petition for review with the United 

States Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit. In this action, EPA 

is proposing to amend specific 

provisions in the performance standards 

for steam generating units to resolve 

specific issues and questions raised in 

the petition for review, but not in the 

petition for reconsideration, and to 

address one issue raised in the petition 

for reconsideration. 

V. What amendments are we making to 

the rule? 

For a detailed description of the 

proposed amendments, see the 

information provided in the direct final 

rule published in the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules 3589 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under the terms of 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and is, therefore, 

exempt from review under the 12866. 

EPA has concluded that the 

amendments EPA is proposing would 

not change the costs or benefits of this 

proposed rule. 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action would not impose any 

new information collection burden. 

These proposed amendments would 

result in no changes to the information 

collection requirements of the existing 

standards of performance and would 

have no impact on the information 

collection estimate of projected cost and 

hour burden made and approved by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) during the development of the 

existing standards of performance. 

Therefore, the information collection 

requests would not been amended. 

However, OMB has previously approved 

the information collection requirements 

contained in the existing standards of 

performance (40 CFR part 60, subparts 

D, Da, Db, and Dc) under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq., at the time the 

standards were promulgated on June 11, 

1979 (40 CFR part 60, subpart Da, 44 FR 

33580), November 25, 1986 (40 CFR part 

60, subpart Db, 51 FR 42768), and 

September 12, 1990 (40 CFR part 60, 

subpart Dc, 55 FR 37674). OMB 

assigned OMB control numbers 2060– 

0023 (ICR 1053.07) for 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart Da, 2060–0072 (ICR 1088.10) for 

40 CFR part 60, subpart Db, 2060–0202 

(ICR 1564.06) for 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart Dc. OMB control numbers for 

EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed 

in 40 CFR part 9. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Small entities 

include small businesses, small 

organizations, and small governmental 

jurisdictions. 

For purposes of assessing the impacts 

of these proposed amendments on small 

entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A 

small business as defined by the Small 

Business Administration’s regulations at 

13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small 

governmental jurisdiction that is a 

government of a city, county, town, 

school district or special district with a 

population of less than 50,000; and (3) 

a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of this proposed rule on small 

entities, I certify that this action would 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small 

entities. In determining whether a rule 

has a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities, the 

impact of concern is any significant 

adverse economic impact on small 

entities, since the primary purpose of 

the regulatory flexibility analyses is to 

identify and address regulatory 

alternatives ‘‘which minimize any 

significant economic impact of the rule 

on small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 

Thus, an agency may certify that a rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities if the rule relieves regulatory 

burden, or otherwise has a positive 

economic effect on all of the small 

entities subject to the rule. 

This proposed rule would reduce 

testing requirements for owner/ 

operators of affected facilities using PM 

CEMS and would allow reduced opacity 

monitoring for owner/operators of 

natural gas-fired affected facilities. We 

have therefore concluded that today’s 

proposed rule will relieve regulatory 

burden for all affected small entities. We 

continue to be interested in the 

potential impacts of the proposed rule 

on small entities and welcome 

comments on issues related to such 

impacts. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This proposed rule contains no 

Federal mandates that may result in 

expenditures of $100 million or more 

for State, local, and tribal governments, 

in the aggregate, or the private sector in 

any one year. Thus, the proposed 

amendments are not subject to the 

requirements of section 202 or 205 of 

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA). 

This proposed rule is also not subject 

to the requirements of section 203 of 

UMRA because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments 

because the burden is small and the 

regulation does not unfairly apply to 

small governments. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

The proposed amendments do not 

have federalism implications. It would 

not have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. These 

amendments would not impose 

substantial direct compliance costs on 

State or local governments, and they 

would not preempt State law. Thus, 

Executive Order 13132 does not apply 

to this action. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

These proposed amendments do not 

have tribal implications, as specified in 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000). These proposed 

amendments would not have substantial 

direct effects on tribal governments, on 

the relationship between the Federal 

government and Indian tribes, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

government and Indian tribes. Thus, 

Executive Order 13175 does not apply 

to the proposed amendments. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 

(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying to those regulatory actions that 

concern health and safety risks, such 

that the analysis required under section 

5–501 of the Order has the potential to 

influence the regulation. This action is 

not subject to Executive Order 13045 

because it is based solely on technology 

performance. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 

2001)), because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104– 

113, 12(d)(15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs us 

to use voluntary consensus standards in 

our regulatory activities unless to do so 

would be inconsistent with applicable 

law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary 

consensus standards are technical 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
3590 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

standards (e.g., material specifications, 

test methods, sampling procedures, and 

business practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. NTTAA directs us to 

provide Congress, through OMB, 

explanations when we decide not to use 

available and applicable voluntary 

consensus standards. 

This action does not involve any new 

technical standards or the incorporation 

by reference of existing technical 

standards. Therefore, the consideration 

of voluntary consensus standards is not 

relevant to this action. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

EPA lacks the discretionary authority 

to address environmental justice in this 

proposed rulemaking. New source 

performance standards are technologybased standards intended to promote 

use of the best air pollution control 

technologies, taking into account the 

cost of such technology and any other 

non-air quality, health, and 

environmental impact and energy 

requirements at a broad national level. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 7, 2011. 

Lisa P. Jackson, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1009 Filed 1–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 67 

[Docket ID FEMA–2011–0002; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1171] 

Proposed Flood Elevation 

Determinations 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on 

the proposed Base (1% annual-chance) 

Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed 

BFE modifications for the communities 

listed in the table below. The purpose 

of this notice is to seek general 

information and comment regarding the 

proposed regulatory flood elevations for 

the reach described by the downstream 

and upstream locations in the table 

below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are 

a part of the floodplain management 

measures that the community is 

required either to adopt or to show 

evidence of having in effect in order to 

qualify or remain qualified for 

participation in the National Flood 

Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, 

these elevations, once finalized, will be 

used by insurance agents and others to 

calculate appropriate flood insurance 

premium rates for new buildings and 

the contents in those buildings. 

DATES: Comments are to be submitted 

on or before April 20, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The corresponding 

preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map 

(FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each 

community is available for inspection at 

the community’s map repository. The 

respective addresses are listed in the 

table below. 

You may submit comments, identified 

by Docket No. FEMA–B–1171, to Luis 

Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 

Management Branch, Federal Insurance 

and Mitigation Administration, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, 

(202) 646–4064, or (e-mail) 

luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis 

Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 

Management Branch, Federal Insurance 

and Mitigation Administration, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, 

(202) 646–4064, or (e-mail) 

luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA) proposes to make 

determinations of BFEs and modified 

BFEs for each community listed below, 

in accordance with section 110 of the 

Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 

42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a). 

These proposed BFEs and modified 

BFEs, together with the floodplain 

management criteria required by 44 CFR 

60.3, are the minimum that are required. 

They should not be construed to mean 

that the community must change any 

existing ordinances that are more 

stringent in their floodplain 

management requirements. The 

community may at any time enact 

stricter requirements of its own or 

pursuant to policies established by other 

Federal, State, or regional entities. 

These proposed elevations are used to 

meet the floodplain management 

requirements of the NFIP and also are 

used to calculate the appropriate flood 

insurance premium rates for new 

buildings built after these elevations are 

made final, and for the contents in those 

buildings. 

Comments on any aspect of the Flood 

Insurance Study and FIRM, other than 

the proposed BFEs, will be considered. 

A letter acknowledging receipt of any 

comments will not be sent. 

National Environmental Policy Act. 

This proposed rule is categorically 

excluded from the requirements of 44 

CFR part 10, Environmental 

Consideration. An environmental 

impact assessment has not been 

prepared. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood 

elevation determinations are not within 

the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory 

flexibility analysis is not required. 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review. This proposed 

rule is not a significant regulatory action 

under the criteria of section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, as amended. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism. 

This proposed rule involves no policies 

that have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform. This proposed rule meets the 

applicable standards of Executive Order 

12988. 

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is 

proposed to be amended as follows: 

PART 67—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for part 67 

continues to read as follows: 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS