63070 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices

**If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of chrome-plated lug nuts from the People’s

Republic of China who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which

the named exporters are a part.

Countervailing duty proceedings Period to be

reviewed

Brazil: Certain Agricultural Tillage Tools

C–351–406 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1/1/96–12/31/96

Marchesan Implementos e Maquinas Argicolas ‘‘TATU’’ S.A.*

*Marchesan has submitted a request for partial revocation of the order under 19 CFR 351.222(c)(3). The Department will examine the request for revocation to determine whether Marchesan meets the threshold requirements

for revocation under 19 CFR 351.222(e)(2)(iii).

India: Certain Iron-Metal Castings.

C–533–063 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1/1/96–12/31/96

Calcutta Ferrous Ltd.

Carnation Enterprise Pvt. Ltd.

Carnation Industries

Commex Corporation

Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Delta Enterprises

Dinesh Brothers (P) Ltd.

Kajaria Iron Castings Ltd.

Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works

Metflow

Nandikeshwari Iron Foundry Pvt. Ltd.

Orissa Metal Industries

Overseas Iron Foundry

R.B. Agarwalla & Company

R.B. Agarwalla & Co. Pvt. Ltd.

RSI Limited

Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Shree Rama Enterprise

Shree Uma Foundries

Siko Exports

SSL Exports

Super Iron Foundry

Uma Iron & Steel

Victory Castings Ltd.

During any administrative review

covering all or part of a period falling

between the first and second or third

and fourth anniversary of the

publication of an antidumping duty

order under section 351.211 or a

determination under section 351.218(d)

(sunset review), the Secretary, if

requested by a domestic interested party

within 30 days of the date of publication

of the notice of initiation of the review,

will determine whether antidumping

duties have been absorbed by an

exporter or producer subject to the

review if the subject merchandise is

sold in the United States through an

importer that is affiliated with such

exporter or producer. The request must

include the name(s) of the exporter or

producer for which the inquiry is

requested.

For transition orders defined in

section 751(c)(6) of the Act, the

Secretary will apply paragraph (j)(1) of

this section to any administrative

review initiated in 1996 or 1998 (19 CFR

351.213(j)(1–2)).

Interested parties must submit

applications for disclosure under

administrative protective orders in

accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(b) and

355.34(b).

These initiations and this notice are

in accordance with section 751(a) of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19

U.S.C. 1675(a)), and 19 CFR

351.221(c)(1)(i).

Dated: November 21, 1997.

Louis Apple,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Group II

Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–31133 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–533–502]

Certain Welded Carbon Standard Steel

Pipes and Tubes From India;

Amendment of Final Results of New

Shippers Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of amendment of final

results of new shippers antidumping

duty administrative review.

SUMMARY: On September 10, 1997, the

Department of Commerce published the

final results of its new shippers

antidumping duty administrative review

on certain welded carbon standard steel

pipes and tubes from India. The review

covered two manufacturers/exporters of

the subject merchandise to the United

States and the period May 1, 1995

through April 30, 1996. Because of

ministerial errors made with respect to

one manufacturer/exporter, we are

publishing an amendment to the final

results in accordance with 19 CFR

353.28(c).

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kristie Strecker or Greg Thompson, AD/

CVD Enforcement Group I, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230,

telephone: (202) 482–3174 or (202) 482–

0410, respectively.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63071

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute are references to

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,

the effective date of the amendments

made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Tariff

Act) by the Uruguay Round Agreements

Act (URAA).

Background

On September 10, 1997 (62 FR 47632),

the Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the final results

of the new shipper review of the

antidumping duty order on certain

welded carbon standard steel pipes and

tubes from India (51 FR 9089, March 17,

1989). On September 23, 1997, we

received a timely allegation from

Rajinder Pipes Ltd. (Rajinder), pursuant

to § 353.28 of the regulations, that we

made ministerial errors in the final

results.

Rajinder contended that in the margin

calculations for the final results we

incorrectly deducted inventory carrying

costs incurred in India from U.S. price

and failed to deduct advertising

expenses from normal value. See

Memorandum to the File from Kristie

Strecker to Robin Gray (October 21,

1997). We agree with Rajinder that these

were ministerial errors, and we have

corrected these ministerial errors in

these amended results in order to reflect

our intent and our practice pursuant to

§ 353.28.

Amended Final Results of Review

As a result of our correction of the

ministerial errors, we have determined

the margin for the period May 1, 1995

through April 30, 1996 to be:

Company Margin

(percent)

Rajinder ....................................... 18.25

The Customs Service shall assess

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. Individual differences between

U.S. price and normal value may vary

from the percentage stated above. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions concerning the respondent

directly to the U.S. Customs Service.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of the subject merchandise,

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of these amended final

results of administrative review, as

provided for by section 751(a)(1) of the

Tariff Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for

Rajinder will be the rate indicated

above; (2) for previously reviewed or

investigated companies not listed above,

the cash deposit rate will continue to be

the company-specific rate published for

the most recent period; (3) if the

exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, a prior review, or in the original

less-than-fair-value (LTFV)

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be the rate

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) if neither the

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm

covered in this or any previous review

conducted by the Department, the cash

deposit rate will be 7.08 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV

investigation.

These deposit requirements shall

remain in effect until publication of the

final results of the next administrative

review.

This notice serves as the final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during these review periods.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective order (APO) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Timely written

notification or conversion to judicial

protective order is hereby requested.

Failure to comply with the regulations

and the terms of the APO is a

sanctionable violation.

These amended final results of

administrative review and notice are in

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the

Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19

CFR 353.28(c).

Dated: November 19, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–31134 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C–549–401]

Certain Apparel From Thailand; Final

Results of Countervailing Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of

countervailing duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On September 3, 1997, the

Department of Commerce published in

the Federal Register its preliminary

results of administrative review of the

countervailing duty order on Certain

Apparel from Thailand for 1991. The

Department of Commerce has now

completed this review in accordance

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of

1930, as amended. For information on

the net bounty or grant, please see the

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section. We

will instruct the U.S. Customs Service to

assess countervailing duties as indicated

in that section.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 26, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Copyak or Constance

Cunningham, Office of CVD/AD

Enforcement VI, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone:

(202) 482–2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Applicable Statute and Regulations

The Department of Commerce (the

Department) is conducting this

administrative review in accordance

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of

1930, as amended (the Act). Unless

otherwise indicated, all citations to the

statute and to the Department’s

regulations are in reference to the

provisions as they existed on December

31, 1994.

Background

On September 3, 1997, the

Department published in the Federal

Register (62 FR 46475) the preliminary

results of its administrative review of

the countervailing duty order on Certain

Apparel from Thailand. Since the

publication of the preliminary results,

the following events have occurred. We

invited interested parties to comment on

the preliminary results. On September

23, 1997, we received one comment

from UNITE, formerly known as the