alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0138 

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF MAR 1 3 2024 

JACQUILINE STEINMANN, 

Petitioner/Appellee, 

Bowen Greenwoou 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

iiitate of Montana 

ORDER 

v. 

BRETT STEINMANN, 

Respondent/Appellant. 

Brett Steinmann (Brett) has filed a petition for a rehearing of our January 30, 2024, 

decision affirming the District Court's order dividing the marital estate. Jackie opposes 

the petition for rehearing. 

This Court will only consider a petition for rehearing if one of the following 

circumstances are present: "[t]hat it overlooked some fact material to the decision; [][t]hat 

it overlooked some question presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the 

case; or [] [t]hat its decision conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed 

by the supreme court." M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a)(i)-(iii). 

Brett argues our decision overlooked his testimony that he put $200,000 of his own 

assets towards the Shadow Circle hoithe before he and Jackie moved in and that there was 

a double counting of some of Brett's business assets in the overall distribution. Brett 

argues these facts were arbitrarily overlooked by the District Court and that they would 

have had an impact on this Court's decision. 

Jackie responds these arguments were new arguments made in the reply brief and 

even considering them on the merits, the District Court was within its discretion to 

determine the amount of pre-marital credit Brett should be awarded in the properties and 

03/13/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0138
its credit determination of his assets. Jackie maintains the court's decision was not arbitrary 

and was based on the record. 

We did address the facts Brett raised concerning his contributions and determined 

they would have no impact on our decision since the District Court is not obligated under 

§ 40-4-202(1), MCA, to award any credit to a premarital interest and the District Court's 

credit determination-was reasonable and based on the record. Further, the alleged double 

counting of Brett' s business assets was raised only in his reply brief, contradicts the District 

Court's final determination of Brett's value of his business, and could not have affected 

the distribution of the properties that were the only disputed issue on appeal. Brett has not 

met his burden under M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a) of showing a rehearing should be granted. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to 

Brett Steinmann personally. 

DATED this ) —day of March, 2024. 

2 

Chief Justice 

Justices
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
WILLIAM J. MURPHY, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMPUTER HORIZONS CORP.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a)    designed
such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

(b)    evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.    The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

|Date:                                                          |  | December 30, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ William J. MurphyWILLIAM J. MURPHY
Chief Executive Officer |  |                   |  | 

---

QuickLinks
# EITC Proposal 2017
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form  10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Howard
N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 August
13, 2008
 
 /s/ Howard N. Feist
III
 Howard N.
Feist III
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### Notes **from Meeting with Stericycle**

**Attended by:** Stericycle Staff: Matt Marra, Greg Fink and Wade Scheel EPA Staff : Jim O’Leary, Kristin Fitzgerald, and Drew Lausch **Date:** January 27, 2015 EPA had a conference call with representatives from Stericycle. Stericycle discussed the comments they submitted on the Retail NODA of February 14, 2014. They also discussed their operations with retail clients.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6986

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY DONELL DAWSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (8:99-cr-00783-GRA-1)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Donell Dawson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Larry Donell Dawson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Dawson, No. 8:99-cr-00783-

GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Harry L. SHARPE, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-661.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 24, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus denied.
Order entered July 1, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00642-CV

IN RE ERIC GORMLY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-07217

ORDER

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
SAFEWAY STORES, INC. 

Page 37.1.810
Page 37.1.811
 

Page 37.1.812
Page 37.1.813
Page 37.1.814
SAN LEANDRO AUTO 

Page 37.1.815
 

Page 37.1.816

 
Page 37.1.817
Page 37.1.818

 

SAN PABLO AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 

Page 37.1.820
Page 37.1.821
Page 37.1.822


SANTA CLARA CO AUTO APPRENT TRUST 

Page 37.1.825
Page 37.1.826
 

 

Page 37.1.827
Exhibit 31.3.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

O&R—Principal Executive Officer 

 

I, John D. McMahon, the principal executive officer of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended September 30, 2004 of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 5, 2004
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1219.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TELECOMMUNICATION 

Use of 1710-1755 MHz and 

2110-2155 MHz Bands 

 Protocol Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed at Washington and Mexico City 

December 16 and 19, 2008 

 

 with 

 Appendices 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Telecommunication: Use of 1710-1755 MHz and 

 2110-2155 MHz Bands 

 Protocol signed at Washington and Mexico City 

 December 16 and 19, 2008; 

 Entered into force December 19, 2008. 

 With appendices.
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Commercial Corp., certify
that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial
Corp. (the "Registrant");

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the Registrant.  We have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2005
                                        /s/ Bernard Korn
                                        -------------------------
                                        Bernard Korn
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chairman of the Board and President
Adjusted Family Cash 

Income Decile1

Average Tax 

Benefit2

Number with Tax 

Benefit 

(Thousands)

Share with Tax 

Benefit

Average Tax 

Benefit 

Conditional on 

Receipt2

Aggregate Tax 

Benefit2 

(Millions)

0 to 10 145 426 3% 5,711 2,432

10 to 20 342 1,078 6% 5,579 6,014

20 to30 507 1,571 9% 5,677 8,922

30 to 40 638 2,030 12% 5,527 11,221

40 to 50 500 1,818 10% 4,839 8,794

50 to 60 263 1,038 6% 4,455 4,625

60 to 70 62 247 1% 4,452 1,098

70 to 80 13 46 0% 5,177 237

80 to 90 14 39 0% 6,361 250

90 to 95 12 20 0% 5,511 108

95 to 99 19 20 0% 6,899 135

99 to 99.9 6 1 0% 8,571 9

Top .1 8 0 0% 6,723 1

Total3 254 8,452 5% 5,296 44,763

Middle Quintile 381 2,856 8% 4,699 13,419

Distribution of Premium Tax Credit by Family Income Percentile, 2018

Note: Percentiles begin at family size-adjusted cash income of: $9,591 for 10 to 20; $15,445 for 20 to 30; $21,192 for 30 to 

40; $28,553 for 40 to 50; $38,278 for 50 to 60; $50,530 for 60 to 70; $64,902 for 70 to 80; $85,078 for 80 to 90; $122,969 

for 90 to 95; $173,633 for 95 to 99; $406,000 for 99 to 99.9 and $1,817,269 for Top .1.

1

 Cash Income consists of wages and salaries, net income from a business or farm, taxable and tax-exempt interest, 

dividends, rental income, realized capital gains, unrealized gains at death, cash and near-cash transfers from the 

government, retirement benefits, and employer-provided health insurance (and other employer benefits). Employer 

contributions for payroll taxes and the federal corporate income tax are added to place cash on a pre-tax basis. Families are 

placed into deciles based on cash income adjusted for family size, by dividing income by the square root of family size. 

2

 Tax benefits are estimated as the increase in individual income tax liabilities from eliminating the tax expenditure, assuming 

no behavioral change. 

3

 Families with negative incomes are excluded from the lowest income decile but included in the total line. 

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Tax Analysis

January 17, 2017
Exhibit 13.2



Certification by the Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Longgen Zhang, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: April 30, 2013

| | By: /s/  Longgen Zhang 
     Name:  Longgen Zhang      
    Title: Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Exhibit 15.1




Consent of Jun He Law offices, PRC Counsel











IFM Investments Limited


26/A, East Wing, Hanwei Plaza


No.7 Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District


Beijing


People’s Republic of China











Dear Sir or Madam:








We hereby consent to the references to us by IFM Investments Limited (“the Company”) under the heading “Risks Related to Doing Business in China” in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.











Yours faithfully,


For and on behalf of


/s/ Jun He Law Offices__________


JUN HE LAW OFFICES





June 30, 2010
UNITES STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS Feb. 5, 2010 Report Request ID: 716899 Report Code: AMP450

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:FMC

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 06 027 1001 81102 2006 2009 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS EVENTS PROCESSING MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES SORT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE STATE_CODE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID POC DATES EDT_ID TribalFeb. 5, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 1of 4 EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES EDT DESCRIPTION 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NO EVENTS EVENTS EXCLUDED EVENTS INCLUDED EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS EXCLUDED NATURAL EVENTS EXCLUDED EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED NATURAL EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDEDFeb. 5, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page2of 4 PM10 Total 0-10um STP (81102) California Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C) (001)

SITE ID P

O C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH MAX CERTEDT 06-027-1001 06-027-1001 06-027-1001 06-027-1001 06-027-1001 2

4 4 4 4 0458 0458 0458 0458 0458 Coso Junction Coso Junction Coso Junction Coso Junction Coso Junction Inyo

Inyo Inyo Inyo Inyo REST AREA ON HIWY 395, COSO JUNCTION REST AREA ON HIWY 395, COSO JUNCTION REST AREA ON HIWY 395, COSO JUNCTION REST AREA ON HIWY 395, COSO JUNCTION REST AREA ON HIWY 395, COSO JUNCTION2006

2006 2007 2008 2009 063

079 079 079 079 77 295 283 137 168 N 0 0 0 0 0 24-HOUR VALID DAYS 60 235 365 366 365 DAY MAX >150 0 1 2 0 1 58 231 363 366 362 %OBS 93 98 99 100 99 1ST MAX 2ND MAX 3RD MAX 47 124 217 83 116 34

92 138 71 107 31

78 86 63 99 EST

DAYS >150 0 1 2 0 1 14.5* 22.5* 19.4 18.1 22.4 WTD ARITH MEAN 56 231 363 366 362 NUM REQFeb. 5, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page3of 4 81102 81102 063

079 HI-VOL SA/GMW-1200

INSTRUMENTAL-R&P SA246B-INLET GRAVIMETRIC TEOM-GRAVIMETRIC PARAMETER METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD METHODS USED IN THIS REPORTFeb. 5, 2010

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 4of 4 PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION 0458 Great Basin Unified APCD