alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Statements of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                ($ in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Twelve Months                                 Twelve Months
                                               Ended June 30,                              Ended December 31,
                                               --------------       ----------------------------------------------------------
                                               2003     2002        2002       2001        2000         1999             1998
-------------------------------------------------------------       ----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>     <C>          <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>              <C>
CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES:                734.6    471.9       662.3      453.7       455.9        529.6            431.6

ADJUSTMENTS:
    Distributed (Undistributed) equity income      -     (1.0)       (2.5)       2.2        (5.5)        (5.8)            (0.4)
    Fixed charges *                            109.5    139.8       124.4      165.9       190.5        181.7            162.2
-------------------------------------------------------------       ----------------------------------------------------------
Earnings available                             844.1    610.7       784.2      621.8       640.9        705.5            593.4

*FIXED CHARGES:
    Interest on long-term and short-term debt  103.5    134.4       117.9      161.4       172.0        167.5            147.2
    Portion of rentals representing interest     6.0      5.4         6.5        4.5        18.5         14.2             15.0
-------------------------------------------------------------       ----------------------------------------------------------
Total Fixed Charges                            109.5    139.8       124.4      165.9       190.5        181.7            162.2

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES              7.71     4.37        6.30       3.75        3.36         3.88             3.66
=============================================================       ==========================================================
</TABLE>

Prior periods have been restated to reflect discontinued operations.

                                       26
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Human 
Resource Development (#1199).
    Date and Time: December 11-12, 1997: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
390, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. A. James Hicks, Program Director, Human 
Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Telephone: 
(703) 306-1632.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Alliances for Minority 
Participation proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: November 17, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30516 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard N. Feist III,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


August 11, 2005


/s/ Howard N. Feist III
------------------------
Howard N. Feist III
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1112 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



## Document

Number: 

# 7) ll-B-2 d Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 2

Printed 4/16/2008 9:12:06

AM Sheet 7 of 97P. 2 

# ARGONN E NATIONA LLABORATOR Y*' n 

# '*• * 970 0 Sou-rk

CAS S AVENUE , ARQC-NNE , Illinoi s 6045 9 TEIEPION E 512/972 - 8 4 3 0

Apri l 1 , 198 5

Dr . Ki mDietric h Universit yo f Cincinnat i Ketterin g Laboratory Cincinnati , OH 4526 3 Dea r Kim : O n behal f o f the U.S . EPA , I woul d lik e t o than k yo u fo r you r willing
nes s t o participat e i n the lea d ris k assessmen t study . You r judgment s abou t possibl e effect s o f lea d o n the I Q o f childre n ar e criticall yneeded . Tom Wallste n an

d I ar e ver

ymuc h lookin

g forward t o discussing thes e issue s a t our meetin g wit h yo u o n Thursday , Apri l 1 8 a t 9 a.m . Enclose d i s a cop

yo f th e lates t versio n o f ou r I Q protoco l whic h wil l be the basi s o f our intervie wsessio n wit h you . Shoul d yo u hav e an yquestion s befor e w e meet , pleas e d o no t hestiat e t o giv e m e a call . Respectfully ,
lonald G . Whitfiel d Decisio n an

d Syste mScience s Sectio n Energ yan d Environmenta l System s Divisio n RGWrb f Enclosur e

U.S
. DEPARTMEN To f EMERG E TIH E IhivERSiT yof GniCAq o
|        |     |                                                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                      |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                               |                                                                                                                                                          |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Date:   November 30, 2020 | /s/ David B. Golub                      |
|                          | David B. GolubChief Executive Officer                                                                                                                    |
|                          |                                                                                                                                                     |
|                          | /s/ Ross A. Teune                            |
|                          | Ross A. TeuneChief Financial Officer                                                                                                                     |
Exhibit
      32(b)








This
      Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
      pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such
      filing.








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18 of the United States Code








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companies (as defined below) on
      Form
      10-Q (the “Reports”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly Keller
      Koeppel, the chief financial officer of





Columbus
      Southern Power Company





(the
      “Companies”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i)
      the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Companies.








/s/
      Holly Keller Koeppel


Holly
      Keller Koeppel


Chief
      Financial Officer








May
      4,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
      Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Treasury approves Iowa’s plan to invest $149 million of CPF funding in 

broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality internet to 

locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Iowa

 

▪ Program Summary: $149 million for Broadband Infrastructure (100% of program

allocation)

▪ Locations to Be Served: 18,972 (estimated)

▪ Program Description: The Empower Rural Iowa Broadband

Program is a competitive grant program designed to address

inequities in access to broadband throughout the state of

Iowa. Using a three-step process, the program combines

mapping data, input from communities, and applications

from service providers to bring broadband service to areas

identified having a critical need for broadband.

‒ The program is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps 

symmetrical to households and businesses upon project completion. 

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by the program will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

▪ Key State Contact: Iowa Office of the Chief Information Officer

Iowa Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

As reported by Iowa, 

estimates show that 

investments made using 

the Capital Projects Fund 

will serve 16% of 

locations still lacking 

high-speed internet access 

in the state.
#### Gerald Warren WHITED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-600.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 14, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1973.

*147James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Elliott C. Metcalfe, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty, Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

McNULTY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offenses of possession of stolen property, possession of burglary tools and of resisting an officer.1 He was sentenced for each offense.

The evidence upon which the convictions of possession of stolen property and resisting an officer are based is sufficient to support said convictions; and no reversible error is made to appear therein. However, concerning the conviction of possession of burglary tools, we are of the view that the record is entirely devoid of any evidence sufficient to support it.

Accordingly, the judgments and sentences entered herein on the charges of possession of stolen property and resisting an officer should be, and they are, hereby affirmed. The judgment and sentence on the charge of possession of burglary tools, however, are hereby reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions that they be vacated and set aside and the defendant be discharged therefrom.

MANN, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.

1

. § 843.02, F.S.1971, F.S.A.
Fw: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172 Susan Stone to: Tricia Crabtree 03/10/2010 03:54 PM

Susan Lyon Stone Ambient Standards Group l US EPA (C504-06) l Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-1146 l Fax: 919- 541-0237 l HSD Phone 919-966-6226 ----- Forwarded by Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US on 03/10/2010 03:54 PM -----

From: Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US To: Rochelle Neal <rlneal@autoalliance.org> Date: 03/10/2010 11:09 AM Subject: Re: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172

Dear Ms. Neal:

We are currently considering requests to extend the comment period, and I will let you know as soon as a decision is made.

Sincerely, Susan Stone

Susan Lyon Stone Ambient Standards Group l US EPA (C504-06) l Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-1146 l Fax: 919- 541-0237 l HSD Phone 919-966-6226

Rochelle Neal 03/10/2010 10:02:09 AM Dear Ms. Stone: Attached please find a request f...

From: Rochelle Neal <rlneal@autoalliance.org> To: Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/10/2010 10:02 AM Subject: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172

Dear Ms. Stone:

Attached please find a request for extension of comment period for Proposed Rule Regarding the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone (“Ozone NAAQS”); 75 Fed. Reg. 2938; January 19, 2010; Docket No. EPA

‐ HQ

‐ OAR

‐ 2005

‐ 0172.

Rochelle L. Neal Legal Assistant A lliance of Automobile Manufacturer s 1401 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 Ph: 202-326-5510 Fax: 202-326-5560 [attachment "031010 ‐ NAAQS Ozone Extention Request.pdf" deleted by Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40706 Conference Calendar

__________________ WINFRED RAY RANDALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NEAL BIRMINGHAM, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-80

- - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He contends that the district court erred by determining that his complaint was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the district court's order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by the district court. Randall v. Birmingham , No.No. 95-40706 -2- 2:95-80 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 1995). We caution Randall that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Randall is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
AFFIRMED.
#### Thomas James WRIGHT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1491.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1974.

Thomas James Wright, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal and the appellant *71having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2008 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2008

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain 
    programs relating to nonpoint source management, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Water Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. NONPOINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS.

    Section 319(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1329(j)) is amended by striking ``subsections (h) and (i) not to 
exceed'' and all that follows through ``fiscal year 1991'' and 
inserting ``subsections (h) and (i) $200,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2022 through 2026''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2008

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain 
    programs relating to nonpoint source management, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
#### W. E. MARTIN CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., River Shores Subdivision, Inc., R. P. L. Enterprises, Inc., Charles T. Church, II, and W. E. Martin, Appellants, v. Scott D. LINN and Wava B. Linn, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-645.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 12, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1971.

W. J. Vaughn and Joel S. Moss, Melbourne, for appellants.

William H. Twyford, of Twyford & Studstill, Titusville, for appellees.

*273PER CURIAM.

The appellants who were defendants below bring up for our review a final judgment which adjudicated that Martin Construction Company was liable to the plaintiffs for $6,419.33 and impressed the lien of this judgment on real property legal title to which was not in said Martin Construction Company, also referred to as W. E. Martin Construction Company, Inc.

The pertinent portions of the final judgment read as follows:

> “ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows :

> “1. That the Plaintiffs do have and recover from the Defendant, MARTIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, judgment in the amount of Six Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Four Dollars, Eighty Three Cents ($6,374.83) together with costs in the amount of Forty Four Dollars, Fifty Cents ($44.50) for a total judgment of Six Thousand Four Hundred Nineteen Dollars, Thirty Three Cents ($6,419.33) for which sum let execution issue.

> “2. That the lien of Plaintiffs’ judgment shall extend to and attach to the following described property.

> Lot 1, RIVERSHORES, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 74, Public Records of Brevard County, Florida. Lots 14, 18, 27, 28, 32 and 39 through 43 inclusive, Block A RIVERSHORES FIRST ADDITION, as recorded in Plat Book 20, pages 131, 132, Public Records of Brevard County, Florida. Lots 11 and 12, Block B RIVER-SHORES FIRST ADDITION, as recorded in Plat Book 20, pages 131 and 132 Public Records of Brevard County

> and that execution and levy may be had on the above described property in the same manner as if it were standing in the name of Defendant W. E. Martin Construction Company, Inc. That said judgment lien shall be prior and superior to any lien attaching to said property since the filing of the Lis Pendens herein.”

On the basis of our review of the record, and particularly those portions thereof called to our attention by the parties, we conclude that numbered paragraph 2 of the judgment quoted above is not supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, that portion of the judgment is vacated. Except as otherwise stated, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; vacated in part.

WALDEN and REED, JJ., and WILLIAMS, ROBERT L., Associate Judge, concur.
Wall-E 550

Specs:

Frame size: 550mm Carbon Fiber

Prop size: 12in Carbon fiber 

Takeoff weight: 7lbs(Including Camera and battery)

Power plant: Four Sunny Sky Brushless Electric Motors rated at 370 KV developing 4.07 lbs. of 

thrust each totaling at 16.28 lbs. total thrust.

Energy source: One Lithium Polymer 5800mAH 6 cell 45c Battery 

Flight time: 15 min Landing with 20% reserves in the battery.

Payload: Gopro hero 4 and gimbal, secondary backup CCTV camera and VTX (video down link)
Flight computer: Xaircraft Mini X flight controller with GPS and OSD(on screen display) for 

constant monitoring of flight parameters such as, Air speed, altitude, attitude, battery voltage 

and home point takeoff.

Ground control: Futaba 14SG and dedicated quad diversity FPV monitor.

Max Flight Speed: 30 MPH

Fail Safes: Return to home, in the event of signal loss the Wall-E 550 will return to the lift off 

point and land safely. This can also be activated and deactivated by the pilot at any time within

signal range.