alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.27





 Exhibit 10.27 

POWER OF ATTORNEY 
 PT Ekanusa
Yadhikarya Indah, a limited liability company duly organized and existing under the laws of Indonesia, domiciled and having its principal office at Gedung Bursa Efek Indonesia Tower 1, Lt. 27, Suite 2703, Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 52-53, Kel. Senayan, Kec. Kebayoran Baru, Kota Administrasi Jakarta, Selatan, in this matter represented by Leonard Mamahit, acting in his capacity as Director of PT Ekanusa Yadhikarya Indah, (hereinafter
referred to as the “AUTHORIZER”); 
 The AUTHORIZER, in its position as heretofore described by these presents, fully authorizes and
grants, to the extent permitted by law, a Power of Attorney, with right of substitution, to Grab Inc., a company duly organized and existing under the laws of Cayman Island, domiciled and having its principal office International Corporation
Services Ltd., PO Box 472, 2nd Floor, harbor Place, 103 South Church Street, George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-1106, Cayman Islands, in this matter represented by Anthony Tan, acting in his capacity as Director of
Grab Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “AUTHORIZED”); 
 ESPECIALLY 

To act for and on behalf of the AUTHORIZER, to take all necessary actions (including, without limitation, to represent the AUTHORIZER at General Meetings Of
Shareholders of PT Solusi Pengiriman Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as the “Meetings”) and to vote its shares at such Meetings and to sign all necessary documents, contracts, agreements, paper writings and/or applications of all
such actions) to effect the sale and transfer of the AUTHORIZER’s shares and/or share subscriptions and/or assignment of dividend of the AUTHORIZER in PT Solusi Pengiriman Indonesia to any transferee whatsoever on such terms and
conditions as the AUTHORIZED shall in its absolute discretion determine. 












 The AUTHORIZER hereby ratifies any and all acts carried out by the AUTHORIZED or its substitute under or
pursuant to this Power of Attorney within the limits of such Power of Attorney, including the legal consequences arising therefrom, on the understanding that in carrying out such acts, the AUTHORIZED or its substitute shall adhere to all rules and
regulations stipulated in the Articles of Association of PT Solusi Pengiriman Indonesia and those issued by government authorities or legislative bodies. 

This Power of Attorney is irrevocable and shall not terminate for any reason whatsoever wherefore the AUTHORIZER hereby waives any and all Indonesian
legislation which may be in conflict herewith including but not limited to Article 1813, 1814 and 1816 of the Indonesian Civil Code. 
 This Power of
Attorney is executed on June 22 2018 and shall be effective immediately. 
  

			
	The AUTHORIZER
	 PT Ekanusa Yadhikarya Indah
  

[Stamp duty Rp.6000]

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Leonard Mamahit

	Name:	 	Leonard Mamahit
	Title:	 	Director
	
	The AUTHORIZED
	Grab Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Anthony Tan

	Name:	 	Anthony Tan
	Title:	 	Director


  
 2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6757

BRIAN M. BLAKEMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JOE SOLANA, Superintendent, Hyde Correctional Institution; ERIK A. HOOKS, N.C. Department of Public Safety; MEDICAL STAFF, Hyde Correctional Institution , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:19

- ct

- 03280

- D )

Submitted : October 20, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Brian M. Blakeman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Brian M. Blakeman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Blakeman v. Solana , No. 5:19

- ct

- 03280

- D (E.D.N.C. Apr

. 16, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Page 28.0

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Checklist Item #28

Does the application include deterministic projections for each year in the extended period of:

• the value of plan assets,

• the plan’s accrued liability, and

• the plan’s funded percentage?

See section 6.05.

The application filed on behalf of the Automotive Industries Pension Plan includes an Actuarial 

Certification of Plan Solvency under ERISA Section 305(e)(9)(c)(i) and IRC Section 432(e)(9)(C)(i). 

This certification is attached as Document No. 7.1 to Checklist Item #7. A supplemental report titled 

Application under ERISA Section 305(e)(9) and IRC Section 432(e)(9) – Additional Information is 

provided as Document No. 26.1 to Checklist Item #26.

Exhibit VII projects the plan’s value of plan assets, accrued liability and funded percentage during the 

extended period through 2062.

Exhibit VII of the report is based on upon our interpretation of the requirements under Revenue 

Procedure 2016-27, Section 6.05.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30837]

[[Page 62613]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 9, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Pat Marshall, Manager of 
Analytical Support, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. First Security Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah; to engage de 
novo through its subsidiary, First Security Capital Markets, Salt Lake 
City, Utah, in underwriting and dealing in certain bank-ineligible 
securities. See Citicorp, et al., 73 Fed. Res. Bull. 473 (1987); 
Chemical New York Corporation, et al., 73 Fed. Res. Bull. 731 (1987); 
Bank South Corporation, 81 Fed. Res. Bull. 1116; BOK Financial 
Corporation, 83 Fed. Res. Bull. 510 (1997). First Security Corporation 
also plans to engage in the following activities: (1) acting as agent 
in the private placement of all types of securities; (2) buying and 
selling all types of securities on the order of customers as riskless 
principal; (3) providing full-service securities brokerage and 
investment advisory services in combination; (4) acting as investment 
and financial adviser; (5) making, acquiring, and servicing loans; (6) 
leasing property, engaging as principal in investing and trading 
activities; and (7) engaging in futures, forward, and option contracts 
for hedging purposes; pursuant to Secs.  225.28(b)(1) - (3),(6),(7), 
and (8).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 19, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-30837 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
Public Services Company of New Mexico


Alvarado Square


Albuquerque, NM 87158





EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 , for Public Services Company of New Mexico (“Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2011 (“Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                            
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:August 8, 2011By:/s/ Patricia K. CollawnPatricia K. CollawnPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPublic Service Company of New MexicoBy:/s/ Charles N. EldredCharles N. EldredExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Michael R. Coltrane, President and Chief Executive Officerof CT Communications, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CTCommunications, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
     (b) [Intentionally omitted]
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 4, 2004   By: /s/ Michael R. Coltrane Michael R. Coltrane President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131874 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131874 

 COA: 260311 

Oakland CC: 2004-198351-FC 

LAWRENCE ROY DUCKETT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63321-63322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-200-027]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

November 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 18, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following

[[Page 63322]]

revised tariff sheet to be effective November 1, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 7E.03

    NGT states that the purpose of this filing is to correctly revise 
the contract demand level for a particular shipper, which revision 
should have been reflected in the October 31, 1997 filing in the above 
referenced docket, but was inadvertently omitted. The tariff sheet 
included in the instant filing sets forth the revised contract demand 
level. No revisions were made to the formula used in calculating the 
rate for the particular shipper.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestant 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing on on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31188 Filed 11-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FIRST QUARTER AND THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO IT.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000023249
<NAME> CONCORD FABRICS INC.
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1998             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997             SEP-02-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997             DEC-01-1996
<CASH>                                      11,734,313              11,858,828
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,605,931              21,616,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,168,452              19,108,381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            61,309,935              57,344,201
<PP&E>                                       7,371,463               8,099,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,387,061              71,844,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,311,055               9,422,543
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,832,554               1,828,179
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,387,061              71,844,716
<SALES>                                     24,750,402              27,048,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,750,402              27,048,240
<CGS>                                       17,081,341              18,949,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,419,808              26,116,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             174,041                 301,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,330,594                 931,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                   535,000                 389,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   795,594                 542,799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22                     .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### Michael SOSBY, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., Appellee.

No. 76-2253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Brian R. Hersh, Miami, for appellant.

Spencer & Taylor, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

*936PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Lawrence v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.,*346 So.2d 1012, 1014 (Fla.1977); *Griffin v. General Guaranty Insurance Co.,*254 So.2d 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); *Rubin v. Kapeli,*105 So.2d 28, 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          29,057
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,794
<INVENTORY>                                     62,212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,414
<PP&E>                                         243,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 392,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,093
<BONDS>                                        103,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,770
<COMMON>                                        14,692
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   392,378
<SALES>                                        395,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               395,243
<CGS>                                          298,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  298,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,263
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,253
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,253
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6613

VAN PRINCE WELCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE ALLEN; RONALD ANGELONE; D. T. MAHON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-95-315-R)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Van Prince Welch, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Welch v. Allen, No. CA-95-315-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED