Pollution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Testing 

General 

Blue Ridge, 

Shale 

Virginia 

Brick Co. 

Compliance 

Plant 36 Kiln 

DLA Inlet 

DLA Outlet 

Emissions Testing 

July 15, 2008 

Entec Project No.: 28164 

16oD Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491=6676 Fax (205) 491-6614 www.entecservices.com 
En ec Services, inc. 

16 D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Telephone: (205) 491-6676 

Fax: (205) 491-6614 

Results of the July 15, 2008 

Compliance Emissions Testing 

P•ant 36 Kiln DLA |nlet and Outlet at the 

General Shale Brick Company located in 

Blue Ridge, Virginia 

Submitted to: 

General Shale Brick Company 

P.O. Box 3547 

Johnson City, Tennessee 37602 

Attention: Ms. IVlartha West 

Entec Project No. 28164 

Completed By: 

Art Otero 

Project Leader 

Report Submitted July 29, 2008 

Reviewed By: 

Tom Lotz 

Technical Services Manager 

hereby certify to the best of my knowledge all field sampling and laboratory analysis performed for this report is authentic and accurate. It has been checked for completeness and accuracy. 
General Shale Brick 

Table of Contents 

Section 

Executive Summary 

Emissions Summaries 

Detailed Test Results 

Sampling Procedures 

Diagram of Sampling Train 

Diagram of Method 26A Sampling Train 

Field Data Sheets DLA Inlet 

Test Run No, 1 

Test Run No. 2 

Test Run No. 3 

Field Data Sheets DLA Outlet 

Test Run No. 1 

Test Run No. 2 

Test Run No. 3 

Control Room Production Data 

Quality Assurance / Quality Control Procedures 

Field QA / QC Checklist 

Meter Orifice and Temperature Check Sheet 

Fyrite / Orsat Standardization Sheet 

Test Protocol 

QSTI Documentation 

Laboratory Analysis 

Equipment Calibration 

Safety Documentation 

Test Nomenclature and Calculations 

1 

2 

5 

12 

16 

18 

19 

20 

24 

27 

3O 

31 

35 

38 

41 

43 

48 

50 

55 

58 

69 

74 

80 

91 

93 
Executi 

Entec Services, Inc. was retained by General Shale Brick Co. to perform compliance 

the 

emissions 

facility 

testing at the inlet and outlet of the DLA (Dry Line Adsorber) for Plant 36 Kiln at 

David 

located in Blue Ridge, Virginia. Mr. Art Otero, Mr. Johnathan Cochran, Mr. 

July 15, 

Bowman 

2008. Representing 

and Mr. Trent McMahan of Entec Services, Inc. conducted the testing on 

General Shale was Ms. Martha West who coordinated testing. Mr. William re- 

(VDEQ). 

Klepper represented the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

General Shale Manufactures brick exterior building material. Shale and clay are mined, 

the 

crushed and sent through a screening process prior to brick forming by extrusion. Once 

facility 

brick is extruded, it is dried and fired in a tunnel kiln at approximately 20000 F. The 

cooled, 

operates two kilns (A and B) with a common exhaust. After being fired, the brick is packaged and shipped to various locations. The kiln emissions are controlled with an ohlmann type DLA (Unit #6). The exhaust stack is located outside the kiln building the east side. on 

Entec Services, Inc. did not deviate from the Test Protocol (enclosed) nor did not encounter any difficulties or problems during the sampling of this emissions source. The emissions test summaries on the following pages give a detailed 

compared 

summary of each test run 

Environmental 

to the maximum emission limits set forth by the Virginia Department of Quality (VDEQ). Tests results indicate that the ACL/HF results below were the applicable permit limit as set forth by •fDEQ Permit No. V/•. 20447. 


0 

0 

0 

0 "0 ¢• 

O• 0 • 
Detailed Test Results 
SOURCE OWNER: 

PLANT LOCATION: 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: 

SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: 

TEST PERFORMED: 

REFERENCE METHOD TESTS: 

PROJECT MANAGER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 

RULING AGENCY 

RULING AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: 

DATES TESTS CONDUCTED: 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 

Entec Services, Inco 

SOURCE OVERVIEW 

General Shale Plant 36 

Blue Ridge, VA 

DLA Inlet 

Annual Compliance Re-Testing 

Square 

Acetone 

VA-20447 

HCI/HF Testing 

Sample Location 

Volumetric Flow 

Molecular Weight 

Moisture Content 

HCI/HF 

Mr. Art Otero 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

Mr. Trent McMahan 

Mr. Johnathan Cochran 

Ms. Martha West 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

Mr. William Klepper 

07/15/08 

28164 

2 

3 

4 

26A 
ENTEC Services, 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hue o•t_•, Alabama 35023 

INPUT TEST DATA 

Client: 

Source: 

General Shale Plant 36 

DLA Inlet 

Field Data 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling T•ime 

1 

07/15/08 

Job No.: 28164 

Data Input By_ Art Otero 

Military Time 1057-1200 

minutes 60 

Test Data 

07/15/08 

1316-1421 

60 

AVERAGE 

07/15/08 

1509-1613 

6O 6O 

Stack Area 

Barometric Pressure 

Stack Static Pressure 

Pitot Tube Correction factor 

Meter Correction Factor 

A•__•____ Ft• 23.36•1 23.361 

Pl•ar in. Hg 30.13 30.13 

• in. H20 0.37 0.38 

• 0.84 0.84 

0.952 0.952 

Meter Delta H @ 

Nozzle Diameter o___.__._•___, 

Meter Volume v,• 

•leter Temperature t•_• 

23.361 

30.13 

0.37 

0.84 

30.13 

0.37 

0.84 

•,vg. Orifice Delta H .•H 

mpingers Wei ht Gain (Moisture) • 

,•H@ in. H20___ 1.867 1.867 

inches 0.375 0.375 

dcf 43.965 39.686 

°F 89.7 102.7 

in. H20 1,57 1.14 

grams 51.7 43.8 

0.952 0.952 

1.867 1.867 

0.375 0.375 

48.832 44.161 

104.8 99.1 

1.87 1.52 

53.1 49.5 

•ilica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 

)xygen Concentration, dry basis 

;arbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

vg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P 

tack Temperature 

•tal Hydrogen Chloride collected, mg 

!!al Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

W88 grams 12.1 7.5 

O2 % 17.0 17.0 

CO2 % 3.0 3.0 

(sqrt z•p),v• (in. H20) 1•= 0.340 0.291 

ts °F 358.3 354.3 

HCL mg 84.4 70.8 

HF mg 284.0 245.0 

11.1 10.2 

17.0 17.0 

3.0 3.0 

0.374 0.335 

354.3 355.6 

105.0 86.7 

300.0 276.3 
ENTEC Services, 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

CALCULATED TEST DATA 

Client: 

Source: 

General Shale Plant 36 

DLA Inlet 

Description _/ Formulas 

Run Number 

Test Date 

•'ime Began-Ended 

Military Time 

1. Stack Pressure 

Pb•r P•/13.( p= in. Hg 

2. Meter Pressure 

Pb•r ,*-H 13.6 p• in. Hg 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64" y* (Vn.JTm)* (pbaf AH 13.6 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed 

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel 

=0.04706"Wi, 

=0.04715°W, 

5. Moisture Fraction 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 

10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 

0.32'(0z)+ 0.44'(C02)+o.2a*(loo-(o2).(c0•)) 

11. Avera e Stack Gas Velocit 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions 

85.49'C *(sqrt z•p)a *SQRT((T,) (p,*Mw) 

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions 

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 

t4b. Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

14b. Hydrogen Fluoride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

=5b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour 

5b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour 

2. Volume collected through nozzle 

4. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 

=(0.01543°H C Lpg)/Q=l• 

=(0.01 S43*H Fme)/Q,•,• 

=(60/7000)*H C LQ=¢•*O,•< 

=(60/7000)*H FQ,td*Q.I, 

=TJP,*[0.002669*V=o+ V•*¥*P•T• 

100*Vn 

Vm(=td) dscf 

Vw,gf=ld} scf 

Bw, fraction 

Md g/g-mole 

M, g/g-mole 

HFcs gr/dscf 

HF -tbs/hr Ibs/hr 

% 

ost Meter Odfice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) 

Difference, (Calibrat must be within 5% of ori•linal Y-factor} 

AVERAGE 

Job No.: 28164 

Data In ut.E.•.,• Art Otero 

Calculated Data 

2 t 3 

07/15/08 07/15/08 07/15/08 

1057-1200 1316-1421 1509-1613 

30.16 30.16 30.16 30.16 

30.25 30.21 30.27 30.24 

40,626 35.787 43.943 40.119 

2.433 2.061 2.499 2.331 

0.571 0.354 0.523 0.483 

0.0688 0.0632 0.0644 0.0655 

29.160 29.160 29.160 29.160 

28.392 28.455 28.442 28.429 

23.90• 20.3•6 •26.19• 23.485 

33,503 28,541 36,710 32,918 

21,780 18,•46 23,983 21,470 

20,280 17,468 22,439 20,062 

0.032 0.031 0.037 0.033 

0.t08 0.106 0.105 0.106 

5.57 4.57 7.09 5.74 

18.75 15.82 20.26 18.2•8 

67.115 58.475 71.891 65.82•7 

101.69 104.00 99.41 101.70 

0.9496 0.9064 0.9454 0.9338 

1.91% 
SOURCE OVERVIEW 

SOURCE OWNER: 

PLANT LOCATION: 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: 

SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: 

TEST PERFORMED: 

REFERENCE METHOD TESTS: 

PROJECT MANAGER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 

RULING AGENCY 

RULING AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: 

DATES TESTS CONDUCTED: 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 

General Shale Plant 36 

Blue Ridge, VA 

DLA Outlet 

Annual Compliance Re-Testing 

Circular 

Acetone 

VA-20447 

HCI / HF Testing 

Sample Location 

Volumetric Flow 

Molecular Weight 

Moisture Content 

HCI/HF 

Mr. Art Otero 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

Mr. David Bowman 

Ms. Martha West 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

Mr. William Klepper 

07/15/08 

28164 

1 

2 

3 

4 

26A 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hue_.•own, Alabama 35023 

INPUT TEST DATA 

Client: 

Source: 

General Shale Plant 36 

DLA Outlet 

Field Data 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling Time 

Stack Area 

Barometric Pressure 

Stack Static Pressure 

Pitot Tube Correction factor 

Meter Correction Factor 

Meter Delta H @ 

Meter Temperature 

Zkvg. Orifice Delta H 

i Nozzle Diameter 

Meter Volume 

mpingers Weight Gain (Moisture) 

.•ilica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 

)xygen Concentration, dry basis 

;arbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

•vg. Sq. Rt, of Delta P 

;tack Temperature 

otal Hydrogen Chloride collected, mg 

otal Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

Symbol Units 

Job No.: 28164 

Data In By: Art Otero 

Test Data 

2 3 AVERAGE 

Military Time 

minutes 

07/15/08 

As 

Pbar 

P• 

Cp 

¥ 

&H@ 

D. 

Vm 

tm 

Ft 

in. Hg 

in. H20 

in. H20 

inches 

dcf 

1057-1200 

6O 

27.883 

30.13 

-0.12 

0.84 

0.978 

Wlrnp 

O2 

CO2 

(sqrt &P)avo 

HCL 

HF 

F 

in. H20 

grams 

grams 

% 

F 

mg 

mg 

1.856 

0.366 

40.651 

85.8 

1.42 

44.7 

6.3 

16.5 

3.0 

0.337 

326.9 

63.1 

21.8 

07/15/08 

1317-1419 

6O 

27.883 

30.13 

-0.13 

0.84 

0.978 

1.856 

0.366 

40.042 

88.2 

1.42 

45.4 

8.3 

16.0 

4.5 

0.338 

329.3 

59.2 

07/15/08 

1507-1610 

60 60 

27,883 

30.13 30.13 

"0.11 -0.12 

0.84 0.84 

0.978 0.978 

1.856 1.856 

0.366 0.366 

40.312 4O.335 

95.2 89.7 

1,39 1.41 

45.9 45.3 

8.1 7.6 

16.0 16.2 

4.0 3.8 

0.334 0.336 

329.9 328,7 

55.5 59.3 

19.5 20.6 

10 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown• Alabama 35023 

CALCULATED TEST DATA 

Client: General Shale Plant 36 

Source: DLA Outlet 

Description 

Run Number 

Formulas Symbol Units 

Test Date 

Time Began-Ended 

1. Stack Pressure 

P•r Pg/13.£ 

Meter Pressure 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64" y* (Vn.JTm)* (Ps=, •,H 13.6 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =0.04706*W•mp 

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel =0.04715*W=[ 

Moisture Fraction 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 

10, Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 

=(V,•std) Vw=•i=td))/(Vw<o•,•) V,=•(ot,• Vm(,•dll 

0.32*(0=)+ 0.44"(CO2)+0.28"(100-(O=)-(COa)) 

Md*(1-Bw=)+10.0*(Bw, 

11, Average Stack Gas Velocity 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions 

85.49*Cp*(sqrt •'P)av•*SQRT((T,) (P,*M•) 

60*V•*A= 

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Condilions Q**(T,•,•T,)*(pJp,t 

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 

14b. Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

Q,*(1 ew.) '(l".,•JT,)*(pJp,•) 

={0,01543*HCL•g)/Q,I 

14b. Hydrogen Fluodde concentration @ Std.Cond.,Graine/Cu.Ft. 

15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour 

15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour 

!2. Volume collected through nozzle 

!4. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 

=(0.01543*HF•g)/Q=t 

=(60/7000)*H C LQ,td*Q,t 

=(60/7000)*H FQ=t•*Q=t 

=T=/P= *[0.002669'V;¢+ Vm*Y*pr,.jT•] 

100*Vn (60*v=*An*e) 

'ost Meter Orifice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) 

Difference, (Calibration must be within 5% of original Y-factor 

Pm 

M= 

M, 

Q. 

HCLcs 

HFcs 

V. 

Military Time 

In. Hg 

in. H 

dsct 

scf 

scf 

fraction 

g/g-mole 

g/g-mole 

acfm 

scfm 

dscfm 

gr/dscf 

gr/dscf 

Ibs/hr 

Ibs/hr 

Job No.: 28164 

Data ,•,u, •,. utero 

Calculated Data 

07/15/08 07/15/08 07/15/08 

AVERAGE 

1057-1200 1317-1419 1507•1610 

30.12 30.12 30.12 30.12 

30.23 30.23 30.23 30.23 

38.846 38.101 37.872 38.273 

2.104 2.137 2.160 

0.297 0.391 0.382 

0.0582 0.0622 0.0629 

2.133 

0.357 

0.0611 

29.140 29.360 29.280 29.260 

28.492 28.653 28.571 28.572 

23.20 23.18 22.97 23.118 

38,820 38,781 38,425 38,675 

26,212 26,105 25,847 26,055 

24,686 24,480 24,222 24,463 

0.025 0.024 0.023 0.024 

0.009 0.008 0.008 0.008 

5.30 5.03 4.69 5.01 

1.83 1.73 1.65 1.74 

61.088 60.359 60.080 60.509 

100.09 99.00 99.45 99.51 

0.9764 0.9896 0.9797 0,9819 

-0.40% 

11 
Sampling Procedures 

12 
Procedures 

The emission rates were determined using EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 26A of the CFR 

Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A and Part 63 Subpart JJJJJ (Brick MACT). The calibration 

and quality assurance procedures of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix A for all methods, 

and the "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement System" Volume III 

Stationary Source-Specific Methods were followed throughout the duration of the field and 

laboratory testing. The most current version for each method (as described in the Federal 

Register) was used. 

Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Methods 1 and :• 

The velocity of the gas stream was determined according to EPA Reference Method 1 and 

2 by reading the instantaneous velocity head with an inclined manometer at each 

sampling point with a calibrated S-type pitot tube attached adjacent to the sample nozzle. 

The stack pressure was measured with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A calibrated 

pyrometer was used to measure stack temperature at each sampling point. The stack 

was tested for cyclonic flow according to EPA Reference Method 1. 

Stack Gas Molecular Weiqht Method 3 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations were determined using EPA Reference 

Method 3 (Fyrite Method). A sample of the flue gas was extracted from the gas stream 

during each test. These samples were analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The molecular 

weight of the gas was calculated using the moisture, oxygen and carbon dioxide content 

and the measured stack gas temperature. 

Moisture Content Method 4 

The moisture content used for calculating the gas stream flow rate was determined by 

measuring the amount of condensed moisture in the impingers in the sampling train as 

described in EPA Reference Method 4 at the completion of each test. Ice is placed around 

the impingers and the outlet temperature of the impinger is monitored and recorded 

throughout the duration of the testing to verify the temperature is less than 68 o F. 

13 
_H__y__d•o_clen Chloride / Hvdroqen Fluoride Method 26.• 

Preliminary data was used to determine stack temperature, pressure, and range of 

velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecular weight prior to sampling. The meter box was leak checked from the pump to the orifice. Initial and final leak checks 

of the sampling system and pitot lines were performed as outlined in Method 5 and were 

recorded on the data sheets. The nozzle (glass with an angle of taper of 30 degrees and 

of button hook design) was calibrated before and after the test using a micrometer and 

was recorded on the field data sheets. 

The sampling probe was placed at each sampling point to provide a total sampling time of 

sixty (60) minutes. The gases were drawn through a Teflon coated nozzle attached to a 

heated glass lined probe. The probe was maintained at the proper settings to obtain an 

exit temperature of greater than 2480 F during sampling. The gases then proceeded 

through borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support through a Teflon filter 

to remove particulate matter. The filter was maintained at a temperature of greater than 

248 o F. These temperatures were recorded at each point on the field data sheets. 

The gases were then scrubbed through a series of four pre-weighed impingers to capture 

hydrogen halides and halogens and moisture. (The optional first impinger for a knockout 

for moisture was not used.) The first and second impingers contained approximately 100 

ml of a 0.1N H2SO,• (acid) solution and the third and fourth impingers contained 

approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH (alkaline) solution. The fifth impinger contained 

pre weighed silica gel to remove any remaining moisture. The gases pass through the 

impinger series in an ice bath to maintain a maximum exit temperature of 68 o F. This 

temperature was also recorded on the data sheets. The clean and cool gases then 

entered the meter box where the gas flow and temperature were measured. 

After the completion of the test the sampling train and the probe nozzle assembly was 

transferred to the cleanup area. The cleanup data was recorded. 

Each impinger was weighed for moisture first verified for moisture, then the first and 

second impinger contents were transferred to its container, weighed and the rinsing from 

the glassware were added to this container. The third and fourth impinger was discarded. 

The silica gel from the fifth impinger was weighed. A blank of the sulfuric acid solution 

14 
was taken. These containers were clearly marked and transported to our office. The 

samples were shipped to Stillbrook Laboratory. 

15 
Entec Services, Inc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, AL 35023 

STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

Client: General Shale Plant 36 Job No. 28164 

Source: DLA Inlet 

Input By: Art Otero 

Equivalent Diameter, inches: 58.00 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (p) 

Length (Side with ports): 58 

Width (Depth of port): 58 

Port Type: Nipple Port Diameter 

Stack Properties: Inches 

Stack Area, Ft2: 23.361 

_P Length of Port, inches: 4 

Total Number of Traverse Points: 25 

Required Matrix: 5 x 5 

4.0" Number of Points per port: 5 

Duct Diameters Ports Available: 3 

0.58 Matrix Used: 8 x 3 

3.10 Number of Points per port: 8 

Upstream Disturbance: 33.6 

Downstream Disturbance 180.0 

58.0 

INCHES 

58.0 •NCHES 

33.6 INCHES 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Point No. Diameter; Inches Diameter; Inches 

3.6 7.6 

2 10.9 14.9 

3 18,1 22.1 

4 25.4 29.4 

5 32.6 36.6 

6 39.9 43.9 

7 47.1 51.1 

8 54,4 58.4 

80.0 INCHES 

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 9 

if the 8 / 2 diameters downstream and upstream criteria is met. 

16 
Entec Services, Inc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Huoytown, AL 35023 

STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

Client: General Shale Plant 36 

Source: DLA Outlet 

Job No. 

Input By: 

28164 

Art Otero 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): p 

Stack Diameter, inches: 71.5 

Stack Height, feet: 100 

Stack Properties: Inches Duct Diameters 

Upstream Disturbance: 168.0 2.35 

Downstream Disturbance: 840.0 11.75 

Port Type Nipple 

Stack Area, Ft2: 

Number of Ports: 

Length of Port, inches: 

Total Number of Traverse Points: 

Number of Points per diameter: 

Port Diameter 

71,5 INCHES 

8o(• NCHES 

Point No. 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Inches Inches 

3.1 8.1 

2 10.4 15.4 

3 21.2 26.2 

4 50.3 55.3 

5 61.1 66.1 

6 68.4 73.4 

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 

4 points per port if the 8 2 diameters downstream and 

upstream criteria is met. 

27.883 

2 

5.00 

12 

6 

17 
Method 26A Sampling Train 

Filter Exit Temperature 

(>2480 F) • 

[2SO_._• • 

lmpinger Exit Temperature 

Exhaust•.• 

[• i l•ry Gas Meier 

18 
DLA Inlet 

Field Data Sheets 

19 
Test Run No. 1 

DLA In•et 

2O 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: General Shale Plant 36 Test Date: 

Source: DLA Inlet 

Run Number: 

7/15/2008 

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 26A 

Traverse Point Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H • Stack Temp. (°F) 

0.17 0.4123 2.26 353 

o2 0.18 0.4243 2.39 357 

1-3 0.15 0.3873 1.99 361 

1-4 0.13 0.3606 1.73 362 

1-5 0.12 0.3464 1.60 363 

1-6 0.09 0.3000 1.20 365 

1-7 0.08 0.2828 1.06 365 

1-8 0.08 0.2828 1.06 368 

2-1 0.14 0.3742 1.86 330 

2-2 0.19 0.4359 2.53 343 

2-3 0.14 0.3742 1.86 357 

2-4 

2-5 

2-6 

0.10 

0.09 

0.3162 

0.3000 

1.33 

1.20 

362 

364 

Meter Temp. (°F) 

82 

83 

84 

85 

86 

87 

87 

88 

89 

90 

9O 

91 

92 

0.09 0.3000 1.20 366 91 

2-7 0.08 0.2828 1.06 368 92 

2-8 0.08 0.2828 1.06 364 92 

3-1 0.14 0.3742 1.86 345 92 

3-2 0.13 0.3606 1.73 350 92 

3-3 0.12 0.3464 1.60 357 92 

3-4 0.10 0.3162 1.33 359 93 

3-5 0.10 0.3162 1.33 360 93 

3-6 0.11 0.3317 1.46 361 93 

3-7 0.11 0.3317 1.46 360 94 

3-8 0.11 0.3317 1.46 360 94 

K-Factor 

13.30 0.12 0.3405 1.57 358.3 RQ "7 

21 
•ZZZ • 

EEE 

LU 
ENTEC SERVICES, iNC. 

METHOD 26A SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

Client / Location: 

Run No.: 1 

Irnpingers 1 

Final Wt. 726 

Initial Wt. 691.3 

Net Weight 34.7 

_General Shale / DLA Inlet Sampling Date(s):_7-15-2008 

Recovery Date: 7/15/2008 

2 3 4 

663.7 708.9 729.0 

650.6 706.0 728.0 

13.1 2.9 

Description of Impinger Contents: 

Silica Gel Color: 

Impingers and 2 (0.1N H2SO4)Contents Container No.: 

Run No.: 

Impingers 

Final Wt. 

Initial Wt. 

Net Weight 

1.0 

Total Moisture 

Recovered By: AO 

5 6 Silical Gel 

63.8 Grams 

Percent Spent: J•' % 

Liquid Level Marked / Sealed: • N 

2 Recovery Date: 7/15/2008 

1 2 3 4 

728,7 666.2 711,2 729.3 

696.9 656.8 708,9 729,0 

31.8 9.4 2.3 0.3 

Description of Impinger Contents: 

Silica Gel Color: 

Impingers and 2 (0.1N H2SO4)Contents Container No,: 

Run No.: 3 Recovery Date: 7/15/2008 

Impingers 1 2 3 4 

Final Wt. 734.3 665.4 713.7 729.9 

Initial Wt. 694.3 655.4 711.2 729.3 

Net Weight 40 10 2.5 0.6 

Description of Impinger Contents: _•,M= Silica Gel Color: 

Impingers and 2 (0.1N H2SO4)Content Container No.: • 

BLANKS: Probe Rinse: 0.1N H2SO4: 

Recovered By: AO 

5 6 Silical Gel 

"•.• 805.2 

Total Moisture 51.3 Grams 

Percent Spent: ,,/• % 

Liquid Level Marked / Sealed: (• N 

Recovered By: AO 

5 6 Silical Gel 

Total Moisture 64.2 Grams 

Percent Spent: //•" % 

Liquid Level Marked / Sealed: (• N 

0.1N NaOH: Filter: 

23 
Test Run No. 2 

DLA Inlet 

24 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: General Shale Plant 36 Test Date: 7/15/2008 

Source: DLA Inlet 

Run Number: 2 

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE- HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 26A 

Trave• 

1-1 

Delta 

0.12 

P • Delta H• Stack Te• • 

1.60 341 95 

1-2 0.10 0.3162 1.33 346 96 

0.10 0.09 0.3000 1.20 350 96 

1-4 0.07 0.2646 0.93 353 96 

1-5 0.07 0.2646 0,93 359 98 

0,07 0.2646 0.93 358 99 

0.07 0,2646 0.93 360 100 

0.08 0.2828 1.06 362 101 

0.08 0.2828 1.06 362 102 

0.09 0.3000 1.20 360 102 

0.09 0.3000 1.20 342 102 

0.08 0.2828 

1-6 

1-7 

1-8 

2-1 

2-2 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

2-6 

2-7 

2-8 

3-1 

3-2 

0.07 

0.10 

0.07 

1.06 343 103 

0.2646 0.93 333 103 

0.3162 1.33 

0.2646 

0.06 0.2449 

0.09 0.3000 

0.09 0.3000 

3-3 0.12 0.3464 

3-4 0.10 0.3162 

3-5 0.10 0.3162 

3-6 0.09 0.3000 

3-7 0.08 0,2828 

3-8 0.07 0.2646 

0.09 

K-Factor 

13.30 

347 

0.93 359 

0.80 362 

1.20 362 

1.20 366 

1.60 351 

1.33 353 

1.33 354 

1.20 359 

1.06 359 

0.93 

105 

362 

0,2911 1.14 354.3 

105 

107 

106 

106 

106 

107 

107 

106 

108 

108 

25 
dddC• 

¢ LE•z 

CZZZ• 

EEE 
Test Run No. 3 

DLA Inlet 

27 
ENTEC Services, 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: General Shale Plant 36 Test Date: 

Source: DLA Inlet 

Run Number: 

7/15/2008 

3 

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 26A 

Traverse Point DeltaP Sq'Rt'DeltaP DeltaH Stack Temp.(OF) Meter Temp. (oF) 

1-1 0.15 0.3873 1.99 364 106 

1-2 0.16 0.4000 2.13 363 106 

1-3 0.15 0.3873 1.99 365 105 

1-4 0,13 0.3606 1.73 346 105 

1-5 0.12 0.3464 1.60 344 105 

1-6 0.13 0,3606 1.73 336 106 

1-7 0,15 0.3873 1.99 338 106 

1-8 0.14 0.3742 1.86 357 106 

2-1 0.15 0.3873 1.99 360 105 

2-2 0,15 0.3873 1.99 365 105 

2-3 0.13 0.3606 1.73 369 106 

2-4 0.14 0.3742 1.86 369 105 

2-5 

2-6 

2-7 

2-8 

3-1 

3-2 

3-3 

3-4 

3-5 

0.3464 

0.3464 

0.3606 

0.3742 

3-6 

3-7 

3-8 

K-Factor 

13.30 

0.12 

0.12 

0.13 

0.14 

0.15 

0.15 

0.16 

0.14 

0.13 

0.12 

0.15 

0.16 

0.14 

0.3873 

1.60 351 

1.60 

1.73 

352 

342 

1.86 346 

1.99 353 

0.3873 1.99 361 

0.4000 2.13 364 

0.3742 1.86 368 

0.3606 1.73 368 

0.3464 1.60 351 

0.3873 1.99 332 

2.13 

1.87 

0.4000 

105 

105 

105 

105 

104 

104 

104 

104 

104 

104 

103 

339 103 

354.3 

28 
O 

•-5 oo 
DLA Outlet 

Field Data Sheets 
Test Run No. 1 

DLA Outlet 

31 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: 

Source: 

General Shale Plant 36 

DLA Outlet 

Test Date: 

Run Number: 

7/15/2008 

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 26A 

Traverse Point Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H Stack Temp. (°F) Meter Temp. (°F: 

0.3317 1.37 327 76 

0,3742 1.74 327 81 

1-1 

1-2 

1-3 

1-4 

1-5 

1-6 

2-1 

2-2 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

2-6 

0.11 

0.14 

0.12 0.3464 1.49 327 

0.12 0.3464 1.49 326 

0.10 0.3162 1.24 326 

0.11 0.3317 1.37 325 

0.12 0.3464 1.49 327 

0.13 0.3606 1.61 327 

0.11 0.3317 1.37 328 

0.11 0.3317 1.37 328 

0.10 0.3162 1.24 329 

0,10 0.3162 1.24 326 

85 

86 

87 

87 

88 

88 

88 

88 

87 

87 

K-Factor 

12.41 0.11 0.3374 1.42 326.9 85.8 

32 

ENTEC SERVICES, iNC. 

METHOD 26A SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

Client / Location: _General Shale / DLA Outlet 

Run No.: 1 Recovery Date: 7/15/2008 

Impingers 2 3 4 

Final Wt. 711.9 709.1 723.9 715.3 

Initial Wt. 682.7 696.6 721.0 715.2 

Net Weight 29.2 12.5 2.9 0.1 

Sampling Date(s):_7-15-2008 

Recovered By: 

5 6 

Description of Impinger Contents: Clear 

Silica Gel Color: Mixed 

Impingers and 2 (0.1N H=SO4)Contents Container No;: 9-1 

Run No.: 

Impingers 

Final Wt. 

Initial Wt. 

Net Weight 

2 Recovery Date: 7/15/2008 

1 2 3 4 

721.8 710.4 725.2 719.3 

686.3 701.9 723.9 719.2 

35.5 8.5 1.3 0.1 

Initial Wt. 

Clear 

Mixed 

R-2 

Net Weight 

Description of Impinger Contents: 

Silica Gel Color: 

Impingers and 2 (0.1N H•SO4)Contents Container No.: 

Run No.: 3 Recovery Date: 7/15/2008 

Impingers 1 2 3 4 

Final Wt. 719,9 710,7 726.8 721.1 

686.8 701,3 725.2 719.3 

33.1 9.4 1.6 1.8 

Description of Impinger Contents: Clear 

Silica Gel Color: Mixed 

Impingers and 2 (0.1N H•SO4)Content Container No.: 

BLANKS: Probe Rinse: 

R-3 

0.1N H2SO4: X 

AO 

Silical Gel 

850.4 

Total Moisture 51.0 Grams 

Percent Spent: ,/' •'• % 

Liquid Level Marke•i / Sealed: • N 

Recovered By: AO 

5 6. Silical Gel 

• 8.3 

Total Moisture 53.7 Grams 

Percent Spent: /•-" % 

Liquid Level MarkecJ/Sealed: O N 

Recovered By: AO 

5 6 Silical Gel 

Total Moisture 54.0 Grams 

Percent Spent: 15 

Liquid Level Marked / Sealed: 

0.1N NaOH: Filter: 

34 
Test Run No. 2 

DLA Outlet 

35 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: 

Source: 

General Shale Plant 36 

DLA Outlet 

Test Date: 

Run Number: 

7/15/2008 

2 

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN F/OURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 26A 

Traverse Point 

1-1 

1-2 

1-3 

1-4 

1-5 

1-6 

2-1 

2-2 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

2-6 

K-Factor 

12.41 

Delta P Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H Stack Temp. (°F) 

0.11 0.3317 1.37 329 

0.13 0.3606 1.61 331 

0.12 0.3464 1.49 331 

0.10 0.3162 1.24 332 

0.12 0.3464 

0.11 0.3317 

0,13 0.3606 

0.10 0.3162 

0.12 0.3464 

1.49 330 

1.37 319 

1.61 330 

1.24 331 

1.49 330 

0.12 0.3464 1.49 331 

0.11 0.3317 1.37 332 

0.10 0.3162 1.24 326 

329,3 

Meter Temp. (°F) 

86 

85 

85 

85 

86 

87 

89 

89 

90 

91 

92 

93 

36 
n>OI 

ddd• 

•zzz•o• 
Test Run No. 3 

DLA Outlet 
ENTEC Services, Inco 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: 

Source: 

General Shale Plant 36 

DLA Outlet 

Test Date: 

Run Number: 

7115/2008 

3 

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 26A 

Traverse Point 

1-1 

1-2 

1-3 

1-4 

1-5 

1-6 

Delta P 

0.12 

0.12 0.3464 

0.10 

0.10 

0.13 

0.11 

2-1 0.12 

2-2 0.12 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

K-Factor 

12.41 

0,10 

0.11 

0.11 

2-6 0.10 

0.11 

Sq. Rt. Delta P Delta H 

0.3464 1.49 

1.49 

Stack Temp. (°F) 

330 

0.3162 1.24 

0.3162 1.24 331 

0.3606 1.61 

0.3317 

0.3464 

0.3464 

0.3162 

0.3317 

0.3317 

0.3162 

1.37 

1.49 

1.49 

1.24 

1.37 

1.37 

1.24 

0.3338 1.39 

Meter Temp. (°F) 

91 

330 91 

331 

332 

328 

33O 

330 

327 

329 

331 

330 

329.9 

93 

93 

94 

96 

96 

96 

98 

98 

98 

98 

95.2 

39 
dddr• 

•ZZZ • 

EEE 
Control Room Production Data 

41 
Production Data 

The following information was received by email from Ms. Martha West of General Shale 

Brick Company for the testing performed at their facility in Blue Ridge, Virginia, on July 15, 

2008. 

Plant 36 Kiln 07-15=2008 

Differential Pressure 0.36 inches 

Production 15.88 tons/hr 

Coal Usage 

Gas Usage 

•.Limestone Feed 

1550 Ibs/hr 

10,540 scf/hr 

200 Ibs/hr 

42 
Quality Assurance / Quality Control 

Procedures 

43 
QA / QC Procedures 

Specific quality assurance / quality control procedures were adhered to during this test 

project to provide valid and scientifically defensible data. For any environmental field 

and laboratory measurement, a degree of uncertainty exists in the data due to inherent 

limitations of the measurement systems employed. The objective of a QA/QC program 

is to produce data of known precision, accuracy, representation, completeness and 

comparability. The objective in this test project was to determine compliance with 

applicable air permit requirements. The final data user in this project will be the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ). The following section details all QC 

procedures followed during the manual sampling activities. 

Velocity / Volumetric Flow Rate Methods 1 and 2, 

Volumetric flow rates were determined during each isokinetic test run. The following QC steps were adhered to during these tests: 

Reported duct dimensions were checked by physical measurements to determine 

cross-sectional duct area. 

Pitot tube coefficients were determined based on physical measurement techniques 

as delineated in Method 2 

The Type-S pitot tube was visually inspected before and after sampling. 

The pitot tube was installed on the sampling probe with the proper orientation and 

spacing from the sampling nozzle. 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for the silica gel impinger exit 

temperature were checked against an N.I.S.T. traceable thermometer. 

The oil manometer was leveled and zeroed before each test run. 

Both legs of the pitot tube were leak-checked before and after sampling. 

Proper orientation of the pitot tube was maintained while making measurements. 

The roll and pitch axis of the pitot tube was maintained at 90 o 

to the flow. 

An average velocity pressure reading was recorded at each point instead of 

recording extreme high or low values. 

The pitot/manometer umbilical lines were inspected before and after sampling for 

moisture condensate. Lines were cleared if moisture was found. 

44 
Molecular Weiqht Determination Fvrite Analysis Method ,• 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations were determined using EPA Reference 

Method 3. A sample of the flue gas was extracted from the gas stream during each test. 

The samples were analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The following QC steps were 

adhered to during these tests: 

• The sampling train was leak checked before and after each samples was taken. 

• The samples were run in triplicate for accuracy. 

® Standardization was performed to audit the reagents and the operators technique. 

A known mixture of CO2 and 02 was analyzed and repeated with 3 consecutive 

values +/- 0.5 percent of the known value. 

,, Two NIST traceable gas cylinders were run against the instrument to audit the 

accuracy of the analyzer and the analyzer operator technique. One cylinder 

contained 2 to 4 percent 02 and 14 to 18 percent CO2. The second cylinder 

contained 2 to 4 percent CO2 and about 15 percent 02. 

Moisture Determination Method 4 

Stack gas moisture content (B•vs) was determined by dividing the mass of moisture 

collected by the impingers or stainless steel condenser and silica gel impinger by the 

standardized volume of gas sampled. The following QC steps were adhered to during 

these tests: 

• The indicating silica gel was fresh for the first run and periodically inspected and 

replaced during runs, if needed. 

The analytical balance was placed in a clean, motionless environment for weighing. 

The balance was leveled and zeroed if necessary before each weighing. 

Preliminary silica gel impinger tare weights and post-run weights were weighed to 

the nearest 0.1 g. 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for the silica gel impinger exit 

temperature were checked against an N.I.S.T. traceable thermometer. 

The silica gel impinger gas temperature was maintained below 68°F and recorded 

at every traverse point. 

Each impinger was wiped of surface moisture before post-run weighing. 

The volume of liquid captured was measured using a graduated cylinder with 1- 

milliliter increments. 

@ 

45 
procedures that were 

sampling system were: 

HCI/HF Samplinq I•ethod 26A 

Accurate particulate concentrations are dependent on the HCI/HF concentrations from 

the stack gas by the use of a series of specialized reagents in the impingers and 

recovered after sampling, and the standardized gas sample volume measured. QC 

followed so that representative data was collected by the 

Only clean, well-maintained sampling equipment was used. 

Sampling ports were inspected and cleaned prior to sampling. 

All equipment was calibrated according to EPA standards. The dry gas meter was 

fully calibrated within the past 12 months using a set of calibrated orifices. 

The sampling train components exposed to sample gas were constructed of glass 

or Teflon. 

Accurate barometric pressure was recorded at least once per day. 

The dry gas meter thermocouples were compared to ambient temperature prior to 

the test run as a check on operation. 

Pretest and post-test leak-checks were completed (must be less than 0.02 cfm or 

4% of the average sampling rate). 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for meter temperature, filter 

hotbox, probe, and filter exit temperatures were checked against an N.I.S.T. 

traceable thermometer. 

Readings of the dry gas meter, meter orifice pressure (•H), meter temperatures, 

filter hotbox temperatures, probe temperatures, and filter exit temperatures were 

taken at every traverse point. 

The filter exit temperature was maintained at greater than 248 0 F. 

The gas meter was read to the thousandth of a cubic foot for the initial and final 

readings. 

The sampling velocity through the nozzle was maintained within 10% of the stack 

gas velocity (isokinetic sampling rate at 100+10%). 

All nozzle/probe recovery items were pre-cleaned and kept in containers when not 

being used. 

The 0.1 N H2SO4 capture liquid in the first two impingers was recovered and placed 

into a container for analysis of HCI/HF. 

Each impinger and connecting glassware was rinsed with distilled water three times 

and added to the respective container. 

46 
The H2SO4 solution was collected for laboratory analysis. 

Liquid levels were marked on sample containers and sealed for shipment to the 

laboratory. 

Prior to the initial run a y-factor check was performed to ensure that the meter was 

operating according to the original calibration to within 3% of the original y-factor. 

For the post-test calibration the alternative Method 5 post-test calibration 

procedures were used (Emission Measurement Center Approved Alternative 

Method ALT-009). 

47 
5. 

6. 

7. 

ENTEC SERVICES, INC 

FIELD QA/QC CHECKLIST 

PERMIT NUMBER: • 

TEST METHODS USED: 

CONTROL AGENCY: • 

TYPE CONTROL DEVICE: 

MODIFICATIONS TO METHOD: 

ON SITE REPRESENTATIVE: 

ENTEC PERSONNEL: • PLANT CONTACT: ._•rl•f• •.. 

YE_._ S 

Was Calibration Data on site? (Methods 1-5 / CEMS CAL Gas) 

Was Stack Diameter I Area & Traverse Points verified on field data sheets? %// 

Was a i 0-minute Meter Orifice Check 

•e performed? 

Results of check (• • •/• 

--• 

Were Temperatures Verified w/NIST Traceable Thermometer? v 

Was Preliminary Traverse wl Cyclonic Flow verification performed? 

Was previous test data on source used to determine K factor? v / 

Was Probe & Hot Box Temperatures maintained at 248 +/- 25 ° F? 

If not, explain 

8. Was Filter Outlet Temperature maintained at 248 +/- 25 ° F? 

If not, explain 4• Jr.'l,, .• c 

9. Was Orsat or Fyrite leak checked and standardization performed as required? Ambient 02 Reading •3,.• % Ambient CO2 Reading•3_____% 

10. Was Tedlar Gas Sampling Bags used? If not, explain Were they leak-checked? Y or N 

11. Were Pitot Leak,.•hecks performed & recorded on each field data sheet? Pitot inspected?•or N Noted Visual Defects? •/• 

12. Was Meter Leak Checks performed & recorded on each field date sheet? 

13. Was Nozzle Diameter measured & recorded on each field data sheet? Nozzle inspected?•)or N Noted Visual Defects? /4•/•..& 

14. Was Silica Gel Verified, and recorded for each test run? 

Percentage Used during test- Run No.'s 1" i•' 2: t• 3: • 

15. Was Acetone Lot NU•nd recorded on Field Data Sheet 

Signature (Test Team Leader): ,•.•/•'A,/• Date: 

Revision 2 December 2005 DLB 

48 

via •o•.•.•i•, email, or fax. 
ENTEC SERVICES, INC 

FIELD QA/QC CHECKLIST 

5. 

6. 

7. 

soo c 

PERMIT NUMBER: 

TEST METHODS USED: •.•A• 

CONTROL AGENCY: 

ENTEC PERSONNEL: 

LOCATION: _• 

PERMIT LIMITS: 

MODIFICATIONS TO METHOD: 

ON SITE REPRESENTATIVE: 

PLANT CONTACT: .•r• 

Was Calibration Data on site? (Methods 1-5 / CEMS CAL Gas) % 

Was Stack Diameter / Area & Traverse Points verified on field data sheets? X 

Was a i 0-minute i•lete,•Orifice Check performed? 

Results of check /,J•S• •< 

Were Temperatures Verified w/NIST Traceable Thermometer? )• 

Was Preliminary Traverse w/Cyclonic Flow verification performed? _• 

Was previous test data on source used to determine K factor? ._• 

Was Probe & Hot Box Temperatures maintained at 248 +/- 25 ° F? • 

If not, explain 

8. Was Filter Ou.tlet T,emperat•ure maintained at 248 +J- 250 F? 

Ifnot, explain..•+ ,•- •,•'•' •F•," 

9. Was Orsat or•leak checked and standardization performed as required? Ambient 02 Readin----g ¢•.•,• % Ambient CO2 Reading O % 

10. Was Tedlar Gas Sampling Bags used? If not, explain 

Were they leak-checked? Y or N 

11. Were Pitot Leak,•hecks performed & recorded on each field data sheet? Pitot inspected?•/or N Noted Visual Defects? 

12. Was Meter Leak Checks performed & recorded on each field date sheet? 

13. Was Nozzle Diam.et.er measured & recorded on each,field data sheet? Nozzle inspected .'•)or N Noted V sual Defects? .••1• 

14. Was Silica Gel Verified, and recorded for each test run? 

Percentage Used during test- Run No.'s 1: •/_•_• 2: 

15. Was Acetone Lot Number v•,•/recorded on Field Data Sheet 

Signature (Test Team 

As required: Control room data supplied by: __•f" 

Revision 2 December 2005 DLB 

49 

Date: 

or fax. 
ENTEC SERVICES, iNC. METER ORiFiCE AND TEMPERATURE CHECKS 

Client: 

Date: 

Meter Box Number:. 

Original •H@ ..___j_•_.•. 

Location: • 

Barometric Pressure: ====__•0, •' "Hg 

Original Y: • 

BioAnnual Calibration Date: • 

Orifice Manometer 

Reading •H equal to 

Dry Gas Meter Readings: 

RUN METER FOR EXACTLY 10.0 MINUTES 

Dry Gas Volume, •t z 

Initial 

Total Volume: 

Vm = Volume of Dry Gas Meter 

Final 

Dry Gas Meter inlet 

Temperature, °F 

initial 

Average: 

Average Temperature of Dry Gas Meter in degrees Rankin (+460) PBarm Barometric Pressure 

Dry Gas igleter Outlet 

Temperature, °F 

Initial 

Average: 

Final 

Yc = 10NrnX •/{ 0.0319 X Tm/Paa•n} 

= 101( •,q'q•, )X •/• 

= ( l, ;• ) × ( o,•.• ) = • 

Is Y¢ < +/- 3% of Original Y ? • /•,•3% 

Thermocouple Check (aB temperatures are in o F) NIST Traceable 

Thermocouples / I.D, 

Stack (Pest Required) 

Probe / 

Filter Box / 

Filter Exit / 

Meter Outlet / 

Impinger Exit 

Other 

Ambient Temp. Reference Temp. Acceptance Ra.ge 

+1-7.5 o 

+/- 5.4 o 

+/- 5.4 o 

+1- 2.0 o 

+1- 5.4 o 

+/- 2.0 ° 

Field Checks Perfermed By (Signature): 

Revision September 2005 DLB 

50 

+k5.4 ° 

OK? 
ENTEC SERVICES, iNC. 

METER ORiFiCE AND TEMPERATURE CHECKS 

Meter Box Number: 

Original AH@ 1. 

Barometric Pressure: %•, I• Hg 

Original Y: •cFT•; 

Bi=Annual Calibration Date: • 

RUN METER FOR EXACTLY 10.0 MINUTES 

Reading •H equal to 

Dry Gas Meter Readings: 

Dry Gas Volume, ft • 

Initial 

•,,o,o. ooo 

Total Volume: 

Final 

Dry Gas Meter Inlet 

Temperature, °F 

Initial 

Average: 

Final 

Vm = Volume of Dry Gas Meter 

Tm= Average Temperature of Dry Gas Meter in degrees Rankin (+460) PBarm = Barometric Pressure 

Dry Gas Meter Outlet 

Temperature, °F 

lnitia! Final 

Average: 

Yc = 10NmX •/{ 0.0319 X Tm/PBarm} 

= 10/( "7.$•/ ) X •/{ 0.0319 X ( -•Z,,,¢ )/( 3o,/• )• 

=( /.'•o.• ) × ( 0,7•/7 )= 0.475 

Is Yc < +/- 3% of Original Y ? •es 0. •; .o• 

Thermocoup•e Check (all temperatures are in o F) NIST Traceable ID•/,•5=•7/ 

Thermocouples I I.D. 

Stack (Post Required) 

Probe I 7 

Filter Box / 

Filter Exit / 

Meter Outlet 

Ambient Temp. Reference Temp. Acceptance Range OK? 

+/-7.5 

+/- 5.4 

+/- 5.4 

+/- 2.0 o 

+/- 5.4 o 

Impinger Exit / •_•- •_• •" 

Other / 

Field Checks Performed By (Signature): • 

R•visioa September 2005 DLB 

51 

+/- 2.0 o 

+/- 5.4 o 
•ac•-.•_f# •.,•.•," ISO/IEC 1702..•3 AND ANSI/N(.SL Z540oi 

4,•,,,,,,,,,, ,:,•.,.•,,;,;•. •,o.• Cert. No.: 4378•i 42i 759 

Yraceable@ Certificate of Calibration for LolliE£# Thermometer 

Instrument Identification: 

Entac 8e•lcos, Inc., t6-D Commerce Avenue, A•ln: Lalan Kirby, Hueylown, AI. 35023 U.&A. R•4A;935101 

Model: 06-664-27 S/N: 221335674 Manufacturer. Conhol Company • .•tandards/Ec -; ................................................................................................. 

pment: ....................................................... 

Descr._•iption 

Temperature Probe 

,_Sel•iAI NLImbet_ Due Date NIS1- Traceable Refe "e ice 149 8/14/07 A67"1303l•- Thermislor Module A27129 7/10/07 100020 z6g4 emperalure Calibra lion Bath TC'155 g3139 

Temperature Probe i57 11!01/06 A5815063 'l'hem•islor Module 

Temperature 

A• 7118 8/23t07 A6823089 Calibralion Balh TC191 A,12238 

technician: 68 Procedure: CAL-03 

Test Conditions: 

Cal Date: '10/'19/06 Cat DLle: 10/'19/0;' 21.5°C 56.0 %RH 1012 mBar 

Calibration Data: 

• .•o• •om.)al As Lefl Inl'ol Min Max 

• • •. 0059 II 

This Instrument was calibraled using Instrumenls Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology, 

".,',,•qL','6• 

Maintaining Accuracy: 

CONTROL COMPANY 4455 Rex Road Friendswood, TX77546 USA Phone 281 482-1714 Fax 281 482-9448 service@comrol3.com www,control3,com 

Control Company is ISO 1702.5 Callbralion Laboralory Accrediled by (A2LA) Amedcan Assodalion fo• Laboralory Acbre(filafil3n at• No 1750,0 I. Conlral 

Inlemalional 

Company is 

Labotalory 

ISO 9001 Qualily Cerlilie•J by (DNV De( Norske Ved Ced licale No, CERT O1805-AO IOU. Accredilalion C:ooperalion LAC} M.Illilaleral Reco•nilion Arrangement 

52 
VELOCITY TRAVERS•E FORM 

Source: •)Z--A- • Project No.: •q,•'t• 

Stack I.D., (Inches) Date: •-/•e• Barometric Press., in. Hg.: •./• Ambient Temperature:•' Pitot ID: •#-• Pitot Cp: • Temperature Device: •/• 

Run No. Time 

PortlPoint /&P, in.H20/ Temp. OF Deg. from 

900 to Null 

3 o.t• •z• o 

Run No. Time Run No. Time 

Port/Point AP, in.H20 Temp. °F Port/ 

Point AP, in.HzO Temp. °F 

AVG 

Pitot Leak Check 02 / 

PreTest • ¢ C02 

Post Test R S Static Pressure 

% Moisture 

Wet Bulb Dry Bulb 

AVG 

Pitot Leak Check 

Pre Test R S 

Post Tes: R S 

% Moisture 

Wet Bulb Dry Bulb 

02 

CO2 

Static Pressure 

Checked By 

AVG 

Pitot Leak Check 

Pre Test R S 

Post Test R S 

% Moisture 

Wet Bulb Dry Bulb 

O2 

CO2 

Static Pressure 

Checked By 

Revision March 2005 LRK 

53 
Plant: • 

Source: •,, j•J•=l•r Date: 7- l•-•" 

Pitot ID: ••• 

Run No. Time 

Port Point &P, in.H=O 

VELOCITY TRAVERSe= FORM 

Project No.: 

Stack I.D., (Inches)_•=•i 

Barometric Pr•s?•/•/Hg.: .•(0, 3 Ambient Temperature: 

Pitot Cp:. Temperature Device: •" 

Temp. °F Deg. from 

900 to Null 

•,zo •3• o 

a. (o •y 0 

b, to •¢• o 

Run No. Time Run No. Time 

Port Poin &P, in.HzO Temp. °F Port 

Point &P, in.H20 Temp. °F 

AVG 

Pitot Leak Check 

PreTest ¢ ¢ 

Post Test 

%Moisture 

Wet Bulb Dry Bulb 

02 •'• 

co•,, 3' 

Static Pressure 

•9.3q 

Checked By 

AVG 

Pitot Leak Check 02 

Pre Test R S CO2 

Post Tes R S Static Pressure 

% Moisture 

Wet Bulb Dry Bulb Checked By 

AVG 

Pitot Leak Check 

Pre Test R S 

Post Test R S 

% Moisture 

Wet Bulb Dry Bulb 

02 

CO2 

Static Pressure 

Checked By 

Revision March 2005 LRK 

54 
ENTEC SERVICES, iNC. 

FYR•TE / ORSAT STANDARDIZATION 

Source: •d=A gl/•//d//•/•£-] L 

Orsat / • Leak Check: 

Date of Test: _•--/.C-Og 

Date of Standardization: 

Orsat/•ID #: •=•. 

Vendor 

Gas 

Concentration, (%) 

Carrier Gas 

Container Type 

Cylinder ID # 

Date of Expiration 

Calibration Gases 

Tank 

Tank 

1 

Actual 

CO2 

02 

Net Actual Net 

3.0 

3 

Actual Net 

•.O 

Average 

Net 

Volume 

Known 

Value 

Difference 

Tank 

2 

Actual 

CO2 

Net 

/•.o 

2 

Actual Net 

3 

Actual Net 

Average 

Net 

Volume 

Known 

Value 

Difference 

55 
Certificate of Analysis 

Date ef A na•ysis: 

Customer Name: 

Grade of Product: 

7tlz•I200,5 

PR]MARY .STAN DARD 

Reference Number; 

Part Nunibe•: 

87-.!10858887-14 

XO3N t81 P 15AC225 

Component Requested Actual Concentration C.oncentrat!o,9 

OXYGEN 3.000 % 2,993 % 

CARBON DiOXiDE t&00 % 15,97 % 

NITROGEN Balance Balance 

Relative Uncertain• of A•t•cal Value: +t- I% of component or +t- 0,02% of absolute, which ever is lower. 

Primary Standard .gas mixtures are traceabte to N.I.S.T weights and/or N.I.S.T gas mixture reference materials. 

Ap•tm,.,al Sigr•atute •/ t" / 

Page 56 
Certificate of Analysis 

Date Of Analysis: 

Customer Name: 

Grade of Product: 

•14/2005 

PRIMARY STANDARD 

Reference Number: 

Par• Number: 

87-110858887•5 

X03NI82P15AC226 

•linder Number 

CC2t 4139 

Notes: 

_C_ omponent 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

OXYGEN 

NITROGEN 

:Re:quested 

•tratio_rl 

3,000% 

15,00 % 

Balance 

Actual Co, nee_ ntratio_ • 

Baiance 

Relative Uncertain• of Anal tical Value. +t. "•% of component or +t. 0,02% of absolute; which ever is lower. 

Primary Standard gas mixtures are traceable to N,I,S,T weights and/or N,LS,T gas mixture 

Approvat Sign•l.ure 

57 
Test Protocol 

58 
Pollution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Testing 

June 19, 2008 

Mr. Frank Adams 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

Test Protocol Reference Letter 

General Shale Roanoke VA Permit VA-20447 

Plant 36 DLA Scrubber inlet & Outlet HCI Removal Efficiency 

Dear Mr. Adams, 

Please find attached the test protocol for General Shale Roanoke, Virginia facility 

Plant 36 Dry Lime Adsorber (DLA) Baghouse Stack. The protocol outlines the test 

procedures, the QA/QC requirements, and example calculations. Testing has been 

scheduled to be conducted on Tuesday July 15th, 2008. Testing will be conducted 

during one day. The facility will supply all operation parameters to meet permitting 

requirements under the MACT and will be included in the final report. 

If you should have any additional questions about the protocol please call me at 205- 

491-6676 or my cell at 205° 613-5473 and will make any changes as required. 

Sincerely, 

Entec Services inc. 

Lynn Beane 

Operations Manager 

16-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 Fax (205) 491- 

6614 www.entecservices.com 

59 
Entec Services, lnc, 

16-D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Telephone: (205) 491-6676 

Fax: (205) 491-661,$ 

Test Protocol for the 

DLA Baghouse Stack 

Emissions Efficiency Testing at the 

Genera• Sha•e Company Plant 36 located in 

Roanoke, Virginia 

Submitted to: 

General Shale 

P.O. Box 3547 

Johnson City, Tennessee 37602 

Attention: Ms. Martha West 

CC: Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

Entec Project No. 28164 

Reviewed By: 

Protocol Emailed: June 20, 2008 

Completed By: 

Tom Lotz 

QA/QC Manager 

Lynn Beane 

Operations Manager 

6o 
Scope of Work 

Entec Services will conduct testing per the requirements of General Shale Roanoke, 

VA Facility Title V Operating Permit No. VAo20447. Testing will be conducted for 

hydrogen chloride emissions removal efficiency on the D/A system per requirements of 

Part 63 Subpart JJJJJ Brick MACT. The proposed test program will take one (1) day 

to complete. Entec will perform the testing on Tuesday July 15, 2008 upon approval of 

this test protocol with an approximate start time of 9:00 am. 

Procedures 

Testing will follow EPA Test Methods 1-4 w 26A (Hydrogen Chloride) of the CFR Title 

40, Part 60, Appendix A and Part 63 Subpart JJJJJ. The calibration and quality 

assurance procedures of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix A and Part 63 for test Methods 

1-4 w/26A of the "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement System" 

Volume III Stationary Source-Specific Methods will be followed throughout the duration 

of the field testing and laboratory analysis. The most current CFR revision of each 

method (July 1, 2006) will be used. 

It is understood that the State of Virginia may at their discretion bring audit samples to 

the test team for analysis in conjunction with the other samples as required. 

The following paragraphs summarize the methods to be used, detailed test procedures, 

QA/QC procedures, and other documentation to be used for this test program. 

Stack Gas Volumetric Flow 

The velocity of the gas stream will be determined according to EPA Reference Method 

2 by reading the instantaneous velocity head with an inclined manometer at each 

sampling point with a calibrated S-type pitot tube attached adjacent to the sample 

nozzle. The stack pressure will be measured with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. 

A calibrated pyrometer will be used to measure stack temperature at each sampling 

point. The stack will be tested for cyclonic flow according to EPA Reference Method 2. 

Stack Gas Molecular Weiqht 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations will be determined using EPA Reference 

Method 3. A grab sample of the flue gas will be extracted from the gas stream during 

each test run and analyzed using a Fyrite analyzer. The molecular weight of the gas will 

61 
be calculated using the moisture, oxygen and carbon dioxide content and the measured 

stack gas temperature. The Fyrite sampling system will be verified to be leak free prior 

to the analysis. 

Moisture Content ('Combined w/Method 

The moisture content used for calculating the gas stream flow rate is determined by 

measuring the amount of condensed moisture in the series of impingers in the sampling train as described in EPA Reference Method 4 at the completion of each test. The 

moisture content will be conducted in conjunction with EPA Method 26A. 

The moisture collection system consists of a series of impingers. Ice is placed around 

the impingers to maintain a temperature <680 F. The outlet temperature of the impingers is monitored and recorded throughout the duration of the testing to verify the 

temperature is below <68 o F. 

d_Hy_d_Eo•e H n Chloride 

Preliminary data will be used to determine stack temperature, pressure, and range of 

velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecular weight prior to sampling. The meter box will be leak checked from the pump to the orifice. Initial and final leak 

checks of the sampling system and pitot lines will be performed as outlined in Method 

26A and will be recorded on the data sheets. The nozzle (glass or Teflon lined with an 

angle of taper of 30 degrees and of button hook design) will be calibrated before and 

after the test using a micrometer and will be also recorded on the data sheets. 

The sampling probe will be placed at each sampling point to provide a total sampling time of at least 60 minutes and a volume of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases will be 

drawn through a glass nozzle attached to a heated glass lined probe. The probe and 

filter will be maintained at the proper setting to obtain a temperature of greater than 248 

0 F. The gases then proceeded through borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit 

filter support through a tarred Teflon or quartz fiber filter to remove particulate matter. 

The exit of the filter will be maintained at a temperature of greater than 248 0 F. These 

temperatures will be recorded at each point on the data sheets. 

The gases will be then scrubbed through a series of five impingers (optional impinger 

not included) to capture hydrogen halides and halogens and moisture. The optional first 

impinger for a knockout for moisture will not be used since the source it is a dry 62 
baghouse system. The second and third impingers will contain approximately 100 ml of 

a 0.1N H2SO4 solution and the fourth and fifth impingers will contain approximately 100 

ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution. The sixth impinger will contain pre weighed silica gel to 

remove any remaining moisture. The gases pass through the impinger series in an ice 

bath to maintain a maximum exit temperature of 68 o F. This temperature will be also 

recorded on the data sheets. The clean and cool gases then entered the meter box 

where the gas flow and temperature will be measured. 

After the completion of the test leak rate determinations will be made. Then the sampling train and the probe nozzle assembly will be transferred to the cleanup area making 

sure no sample will be lost. The cleanup data will be recorded. 

The first, second and third impinger contents will be transferred to its tarred container, 

weighed and the rinsing from the glassware will be added to this container. The fourth 

and fifth impinger contents will be transferred to its respective tarred container, weighed 

and the rinsing from the glassware will be added to this container. The silica gel from 

the fifth impinger will be transferred to its respective tarred container and weighed. A 

blank of the sulfuric acid solution, sodium hydroxide, distilled water and acetone will be 

taken. These containers will be clearly marked and transported to the laboratory for 

analysis. 

An approved and accredited laboratory will perform all of the laboratory analysis. 

QA / QC Procedures 

Specific quality assurance / quality control procedures will be adhered to during this test 

project to provide valid and scientifically defensible data. For any environmental field 

and laboratory measurement, a degree of uncertainty exists in the data due to inherent 

limitations of the measurement systems employed. The objective of a QA/QC program 

is to produce data of known precision, accuracy, representation, completeness and 

comparability. The objective in this test project is to determine compliance with 

applicable air permit requirements. The final data user in this project will be the State of 

Georgia Department of Environmental Quality. 

The following section details all QC procedures to be followed during the sampling. 

63 
Velocit=y / Volumetric Flow Rate 

Volumetric flow rates will be determined during each isokinetic test run. The following QC steps will be adhered to during these tests: 

= Reported duct dimensions will be checked by physical measurements to determine 

cross-sectional duct area. 

o Pitot tube coefficients are determined based on physical measurement techniques 

as delineated in Method 2 before and after each test. 

= The Type-S pitot tube are visually inspected before and after sampling. 

® The pitot tube is installed on the sampling probe with the proper orientation and 

spacing from the sampling nozzle. 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for the silica gel impinger exit 

temperature are checked against an N.I.S.T. traceable thermometer. 

The oil manometer is leveled and zeroed before each test run. 

Both legs of the pitot tube are leak-checked before and after sampling. 

Proper orientation of the pitot tube is maintained while making measurements. The 

roll and pitch axis of the pitot tube is maintained at 90 o to the flow. 

An average velocity pressure reading is recorded at each point instead of recording 

extreme high or low values. 

The pitot/manometer umbilical lines are inspected before and after sampling for 

moisture condensate. Lines are cleared if moisture is found. 

Molecular Weiqht Determination Fyrite Analysi• 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations are determined using EPA Reference 

Method 3. A sample of the flue gas is extracted from the gas stream during each test. 

The samples are analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The following QC steps are 

adhered to during these tests: 

, The sampling train is leak checked before and after each sample is taken. 

• The samples are run in triplicate for accuracy. 

" Standardization is performed to audit the reagents and the operators technique. A 

known mixture of CO2 and O2 is analyzed and repeated with 3 consecutive values 

+/- 0.5 percent of the known value. 

Two NIST traceable gas cylinders 

accuracy of the analyzer and the 

are run against the instrument to audit the 

analyzer operator technique. One cylinder 

contains 2 to 4 percent 02 and 14 to 18 percent CO2. The second cylinder contains 

2 to 4 percent CO2 and about 15 percent 02. 

64 
Moisture Determination 

Stack gas moisture content (B•vs) is determined by dividing the mass of moisture 

collected by the impingers or stainless steel condenser and silica gel impinger by the 

standardized volume of gas sampled. The following QC steps are adhered to during 

these tests: 

• The indicating silica gel is fresh for the first run and periodically inspected and 

replaced during runs, if needed. 

The analytical balance is placed in a clean, motionless environment for weighing. 

The balance is leveled and zeroed if necessary before each weighing. 

Preliminary silica gel impinger tare weights and post-run weights are weighed to the 

nearest 0.1 g. 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for the silica gel impinger exit 

temperature are checked against an N.I.S.T. traceable thermometer. 

The silica gel impinger gas temperature is maintained below 68°F and recorded at 

every traverse point. 

Each impinger is wiped of surface moisture before post-run weighing. 

The volume of liquid captured is measured using a graduated cylinder with 1- 

milliliter increments. 

HCI Samplinq Method 26A 

Hydrogen Chloride concentrations will be determined from the stack gas by the use of a 

series of specialized reagents in the impinger train and recovered after sampling, and 

the standardized gas sample volume measured. QC procedures that will be followed so 

that representative data will be collected by the sampling system were: 

• Only clean, well-maintained sampling equipment will be used. 

• Sampling ports will be inspected and cleaned prior to sampling. 

• All equipment will be calibrated according to EPA standards. The dry gas meter will 

be fully calibrated within the past 12 months using a set of calibrated orifices. 

, The sampling train components exposed to sample gas will be constructed of glass 

or Teflon. 

Accurate barometric pressure will be recorded at least once per day. 

The dry gas meter thermocouples will be compared to ambient temperature prior to 

the test run as a check on operation. 

Pretest and post-test leak-checks will be completed (must be less than 0.02 cfm or 

4% of the average sampling rate). 

Before each series of tests, thermocouple readings for meter temperature, filter 

65 
hotbox, probe, and filter exit temperatures will be checked against an N.I.S.T. 

traceable thermometer. 

Readings of the dry gas meter, meter orifice pressure (•H), meter temperatures, 

filter hotbox temperatures, probe temperatures, and filter exit temperatures will 

betaken at every traverse point. 

Probe and filter temperatures will be monitored and maintained at greater than 248 0 

F. 

The filter exit temperature will be maintained at greater than 248 0 F. 

The gas meter will be read to the thousandth of a cubic foot for the initial and final 

readings. 

The sampling velocity through the nozzle will be maintained within 10% of the stack 

gas velocity (isokinetic sampling rate at 100±10%). 

All nozzle recovery items will be pre-cleaned and kept in containers when not 

being used. 

The 0.1 N H2SO4 capture liquid in the first two impingers will be recovered and 

placed into a container for analysis of HCI/HF. 

The 0.1 N NaOH capture liquid in the last two impingers will be recovered and 

placed into a container for analysis of CI/F (if needed). 

Each impinger and connecting glassware will be rinsed with distilled water three 

times and added to the respective container. 

The H2SO4 solution will be collected for laboratory analysis. 

Liquid levels will be marked on sample containers and sealed for shipment to the 

laboratory. 

Prior to the initial run a y-factor check will be performed to ensure that the meter will 

be operating according to the original calibration to within 3% of the original y-factor. 

If required a three point post-test calibration of the meter box will be performed at 

the calibration point nearest to the average delta h at a vacuum greater than that 

seen during the test. The recalibration value shall be 5% of the original value or 

less. 

66 
TEST CALCULATIONS 

EQUATIONS 

1. Ps= Pbar +(Pg/13.6)=( + /13.6) 

2. Pr•= Pba, +(&H/13.6)=( + /13.6) 

3. V•nste=17.64 V,n Y (Prn/Tr,)=17.64*( )*( )*( 

4. Vwste 0.04707 VI0=0.04707"( )= 

5. Bws= Vwstd/(Vmstd + Vwstd)=( )/( + )= 

/ )= 

For saturated sources (No. 6 8 only): If No. 6 is less than No. 5 source is considered saturated 

6. TB,•s= (106.37. {2827/(ts+365)}/ps 10 6'37"{2827/( +365)}/( 

7. TVwste= V,•te*( TBw,/1- TB,•s)=( )*( 

8. TV•c= TV,•ste/0.04707 =( / 0.04707 )= 

9. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

19. 

20. 

)/( 1 

Me= 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28((100-(%CO2+%O2)) =0.44( )+0.32( )+0.28(100-( + )= 

Ms= Me (1- Bw•)+18 B,,•=( )*(1- )+18( 

Vs= 85.49 Cp* •/AP 

85.49*(0.84)*( )*•/( /(( )( 

ea= Vs As 60=( )( )(60)= 

es ea (1- gws) (528fT•)*(Ps/29.92)=( )(1- )*(528/ 

Cs=0.01543" (Mn/Vr•,te)=0.01543*( / )= 

PMR= C•* Qs (60/7000)=( )*( )*(60/7000)= 

Vn=Ts/Ps*{(0.002669) V=c+ (Vrn Y Prn)/Trn)} =( / )*{(0.002669)( )+( )( )( 

I=Vn100/(60*e*V•*A,)=( )100 / (60)( )( )( 

%EA= 100%* {(%O2)-0.5*(%CO)} / {0.264(%N2) (%02)+ 0.5*(%CO)} 100%*{( )-0.5( )} / {0.264( )-( )+0.5( 

Cs @ 50% EA= Cs/1 -[{1.5(%O2)-0.133(%N2)-0.75(%CO)}/20.9] =( / 1-[{1.5( )-0.133( )-0.75( 

Ib/mmBtu= (Cs/7000)*{(Fe*20.9)/(20.9-%O2)} =( /7000)*{( )'20.9)/(20.9-( )}= 

)))= 

)*( /29.92)= 

)/( )}= 

)= 

)}/20.9]= 

67 
AS 

A• 

ACFM 

gws 

C• 

C. 

Cp 

AH 

AP 

dscf 

EA 

E/Btu 

F 

M• 

Ma 

M• 

I 

Pbar 

Pg 

Pm 

PMR 

P• 

Pstd 

Q. 

Q• 

TBw• 

TV•c 

TVwstd 

Tm 

Tstd 

Vic 

Vm 

V. 

V• 

Vmstd 

V• 

Vwstd 

Y 

NOMENCLATURE 

Cross-sectional area of stack, square feet 

Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet 

Actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions 

Proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream 

Particulate concentration in stack gas, gr/dscf 

Deionized water blank residue concentration, mg/g 

Pitot tube coefficient 

Pressure drop across orifice meter, inches water 

Velocity head of stack gas, inches water 

Cubic feet of dry gas corrected to standard conditions 

Excess Air 

Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/mmBtu 

F-factor, 9640 dscf/MMBTU's of heat input 

Constant (85.49) 

Total particulate matter collected, mg 

Molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, lb/lb-mole 

Molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, lb/lb-mole 

Percent of isokinetic sampling 

Barometric pressure, inches mercury 

Stack static pressure, inches of water 

Barometric pressure of dry gas meter, in. mercury 

Particulate mass rate, pounds/hour 

Absolute stack gas pressure, inches mercury 

Barometric pressure, standard conditions, 29.92 "Hg 

Volumetric flow rate, actual conditions, ACF/min 

Volumetric flow rate, dry standard conditions, dscf/min 

Theoretical water vapor in the gas stream based on saturated stack conditions, proportion by volume (dimensionless) 

Theoretical volume of water collected based on saturated stack conditions, ml 

Theoretical volume of water vapor in the gas sample based on saturated stack conditions, corrected to standard temperature and pressure, scf 

Absolute average dry gas meter temperature, degree R (460) 

Absolute average stack gas temperature, degree R (460) 

Absolute temperature at standard conditions, 528 R 

Total sampling time, minutes 

Total volume collected in impingers and silica gel, ml 

Volume of gas sampled through gas meter, cubic feet 

Volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, ACF 

Stack gas volume sampled, ACF 

Volume of gas sampled through gas meter, cubic feet 

Average stack gas velocity, feet/sec 

Volume of water vapor in gas sampled, standard cubic feet 

Dry gas meter calibration factor 

-) 

68 
QSTI Documentation 
0 o• 

• 0 

< 

70 

0 

0 

o0 

Laboratory Analysis 

74 
Environmental Testing Laboratory, 

305 Crawford Street 

Fairfield, AlL 35064 

(205) 788-1750 

LaD tuvolce •: AUlY/ 

Client: Mr. Tom Lotz 

Entec Services, Inc. 

16D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, AL 35023 

Date: July 24• 2008 

Project Name: General Shale Project Number: 28164 

Project Location: N/A P.Oo Number: N/A 

Sample Matrix: Liquid 

Sampled By: Art Otero Date Collected: July 15, 2008 

Test Method: "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/3-83. 

LIQUID ASSAYS 

Total HCL 63.1 59.2 55.5 0.02 To•l mg 300.0 22-Jd-08 1530 

Tot• • 21.8 20.4 19.5 0.02 To•l mg 300.0 22-Jul-08 1530 

:':'•'Z'Z'7"7"Z'Z.:.7.:.:. 

Vol•e 295 325 295 • •5•5 22-J•-08 1530 

Total HCL 84.4 70.8 105 0.02 Total mg 300.0 22-Jul-08 1530 MD 

Total I-• 284 245 300 0.02 Total nag 300.0 22-Jul-08 1530 MD 

1"1"i+1"51-1-551-i.'. Volume 305 310 310 mL ::::::::::::::::::::::::: 22-Jul-08 1530 MD 

'TotalHCL BDL !i!iiiiii!i!i!iiiiiiii!Sii iiiii!!Siiiiii!iiii!iiiii 0.02mg/L 300.0 22-Jul-08 1530 MD 

Total 

Volume 

Detection limit, practical 

BDL=Below Detection Limit 

.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:+:.:.:.:.. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:- 

195 <':':':':':':':':'::':': mL 

22-Jul-08 1530 MD 

22-Jul-08 1530 MD 

Respectfully submitted, 

President 

ADEM Laboratory Certification I.D.# 40710 

75 
Environmental Testing Laboratory• Inc. 

305 Crawford Street 

Fairfield, AL 35064 

(205) 788-1750 

)Client: 

Project Name: 

Project Location: 

Sample Matrix: 

Sampled By: 

Lab Analyst: 

Test Method: 

Mr. Tom Lotz 

Entec Services, Inc. 

16D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, AL 35023 

Date: July 24, 2008 

General Shale Project Number: 28164 

N/A P.O. Number: N/A 

Liquid 

Art Otero Date Collected: July 15, 2008 

MD Date/Time Analyzed: July 22, 2008 @ 1530 

"Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/3-83. Method 300.0. 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

ERA Minerals Reference Control Lot #P135506 

Chloride Assayed: 51.5 mg/L 

Fluoride Assayed: 2.51 mg/L 

Range: 44.8-53.8 mg/L 

Range: 2.29-3.07 mg/L 

Respectfully subn•tted, 

John T. Brooks 

President 

ADEM Laboratory Certification I.D.# 40710 

76 
Client 

Contact: 

Phone No: 

ENTEC SERVICES, INC. 

Chain of Custody 

General Shale 

Tom Lotz 

250-491-6676 

Project # 28164 PO # 

Lab Name Stillbrook Laboratories 

Lab Invoice # • ./• • 

Entec Job No. # 

Samples Collected by: 

Send Results to: 

Phone Fax Results To: 

Art Otero 

Tom Lotz C/O: Entec Services or Client 

205-491-6676 

Run 1 DLA Outlet 7/15/2OO8 

Run 2 DLA Outlet 7/15/2008 HCI, HF 

Run 3 DLA Outlet 7/15/2008 HCI, HF 

Run 1 DAL Inlet 

Run 2 DLA Inlet 

Run 3 DLA Inlet 

7/15/2008 

7/15/2O08 

7/15/2008 

Blank 7/15/2008 

HCI, HF H2SO4 

HCI, HF 

HCI, HF 

HCI, HF 

HCI, HF 

H2SO4 

H2SO4 

H2SO4 

H2SO4 

H2SO4 

H2SO4 

Print Name: Tom Lotz Time (24hr): 10:30 Print Name: 

Signature: Date: / / Signature: 

Print Name: Time (24hr): Print Name: 

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS COMMENTS: 

77 
ENTEC SERVICES, INC 

LABORATORY SAMPLES QA/QC CHECKLIST 

RECOVERED BY: 

• PROJECT NO: 

SAMPLING DATE(S): 

METHOD(S):. 

RECOVERY DATE: /3 

Description of Impinger Contents: 

Test Run ao.'s t" •../•,a r • 

Impinger Contents Container Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1: ]'•_•/ 2: •" •- 3: /•Z-3 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container?(f•or N 

Liquid Level Marked? (•r N 

Filter ID Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1: /4J,• 2"----•.. 3.•" 

Description of Particulate on Filter: 

Test Run No.'s 1" 

Filter Container Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1: • 3:"7 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container? Y or N 

Probe Rinse Container Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1" /•.• 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container? Y or N 

Liquid Level Marked? Y or N 

Probe Rinse Reagent: /k) ,A Lot Number:_ /b/• 

Laboratory Blanks: 

Probe Impinger: • Filter: Other: Rinse: 

Were samples analyzed by Entec Services, Ipc.? Y or(E) 

If not, Laboratory Performing Analysis" "--•t'//,•/'00 • 

Signature: -•/'•/// / (/'/" 

"• /t••- Date: ""7" I ]'7"/ • Signature: 

Print Name:../}q L//•..rO Time (24hr): • •/: •) Print Name: 

Signature r Team Leader): Date: 

Revision 2 September 2005 TLj 

78 
ENTEC SERVICES, 

LABORATORY SAMPLES QA/QC CHECKLIST 

PROJECT No:__ 

SAMPLING DATE(S): 

METHOD(S): 

RECOVERY DATE: 

Description of Impinger Conterjts: 

Test Run No.'s 1: •__/£.o/d• 2: 

Impinger Contents Container Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1: •_ -// 2: 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container? 

Liquid Level Marked? Y or N 

Filter ID Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1: /hJ/& "----'--'2T 

Description of Particulate on Filter: 

Test Run No.'s 1: f•.,6• • 

5. Filter Container Number: ") Test Run No.'s 1: /•, 2: 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container? 

Probe Rinse Container Number: 

Test Run No.'s 1 :. I•'/• 2: 

Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container? 

Liquid Level Marked? Y or N 

7. Probe Rinse Reagent: • • 

Lot Number: 

8. Laboratory Blanks: 

Probe Rinse: Impinger: )(k Filter: 

Were samples analyzed by Entec Services, Inc.? Y or(!• 

If not, Laboratory Performing Analysis: "• ;/_LL•r•e k 

YorN 

YorN 

3: 

YorN 

Other: 

*** If using outside laboratory services please fill out the following chain of custody. 

Signature: •el•/ • Date: G//ZIOZ Signature: •& 

Pdnt Name: Print Name: • ••••. 

Signatu•r or Team Leader): 

Revision 2 September 2005 TLj 

Date:, 

79 
Equipment Calibrations 

8O 
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS 

All of the emission testing equipment used was calibrated according to the procedures 

outlined in the EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix "A" and the Quality Assurance Handbook 

for Air Pollution Measurement System,% Volume III, EPA-600/4-77o027b. 

Tv'pe-S Pitot tube Calibrations 

The pitot tubes used for flow velocity measurement were checked for dimensions to 

verify a pitot coefficient Cp of 0.84. Documentation of the calibration and calibration 

check for dimensional measurements is provided. 

,$amplin_cl Nozzle Calibration 

Sampling nozzles were checked visually for nicks or damage and for dimensional 

calibration prior to testing by measuring the nozzle diameter in at least three planes 

using a Vernier micrometer. Measurements must agree to within _+0.004-inches. 

Documentation is provided on the individual data sheets. 

Temperature Measurinq Device Calibrations 

Each temperature sensor (stack gas, dry gas meter, and impinger exit) and readout 

was calibrated at a minimum of two points over the anticipated range of use against a 

NIST-traceable mercury-in-glass thermometer. All sensors/readouts were calibrated 

prior to field sampling. Stack gas thermocouples must agree within 1.5% (expressed in 

degrees R) of the reference thermometer through out the entire calibration range. Dry 

gas meter thermocouples must agree within +5.4°F and impinger exit thermocouples 

must agree within +2°F. Documentation is provided. 

Dry Gas Meter Calibrations 

Dry gas meters were fully calibrated against a set of calibrated orifices. After assembly 

and leak checking, the console's pump is allowed to run for 15-minutes to warm up the 

dry gas meter and pump. For a pre-test full calibration, data are collected at five (5) 

orifice manometer (/•H) settings of approximately: 0.32, 0.67, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.9 inches of 

H20. Gas volumes of at least 5 ft 3 

are used at all the orifice settings and critical 

vacuums were obtained at all of the calibration points. The individual gas meter 

correction factors (y=) are calculated for each orifice setting and averaged. The method 

requires that each of the individual correction factors fall within +2% of the average 

81 
correction factor, or the meter be cleaned, adjusted or repaired and recalibrated. The 

orifice pressure differential (AH@) that equates to 0.75 cfm of air at 68°F and 29.92 

inches Hg is calculated and along with the average correction factor (y) is marked on 

the meter console. 

For the post-test calibration the alternative Method 5 post-test calibration procedures 

were used (Emission Measurement Center Approved Alternative Method ALT-O09). 

Prior to the initial run a y-factor check was performed to ensure that the meter was 

operating according to the original calibration to within 3% of the original y-factor. 

82 
w 

0 
o 

.o g o 

1.1.1 

z 

D_ 

0000 

•C• oooo 

84 

o • 

0 

• oooo• 
TYPE S PITOT TUBE iNSPECTiON DATA SHEET 

Parameter Value 

Assembl• Level? Yes 

Holes Dama No 

Obstructed? No 

0•1 0 

o•2 0 

A 

Z A sin 

0 

0 

90 

90 

.988 

0 

W A sin e 0 

PA .494 

PB .494 

PA" PB 0 

DT .375 

Thermocouple Cal. 67 

Thermocouple Cal. 67 

Allowable Ran_a__•L• 

Yes 

No 

No 

-10 < o•1 < +10 

-10 < o•2 < +10 

-5 < • < +5 

for 1/4" OD, 0.526 to 0.750 

for 3/8" OD, 0.788 to 1.125 

Z < 0.125" 

W < 0.031" 

for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 

for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 

for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 

for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 

-0.063 to 0.063" 

0.188 to 0.375" 

Reference temp. 

Probe Thermocouple 

Certification 

certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe ID # ESP- 62B meets or exceeds all specifications, criteria and/or applicable design features and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor Cp of 0.84 

Certified and Calibrated By: 

Date Certified: 

Lalan R. Kirby 

12/21/2007 

Annual Calibration 

85 
TYPE S PITOT TUBE iNSPECTiON DATA SHEET 

Parameter 

Assembl)/Level? 

Holes Damaged? 

Obstructed? 

0 

A 

Z A sin y 

W A sin e 

PA 

PB 

PA PB 

DT 

Thermocouple Cal. 

Thermocouple Cal. 

Value 

Yes 

No 

No 

0 

0 

0 

0 

9O 

9O 

.909 

0 

0 

.429 

.429 

0 

.375 

67 

67 

Allowable Rane L 

Yes 

No 

No 

-10 < (zl < +10 

-10 < (z2 < +10 

-5 < •1 < +5 

for 1/4" OD, 0.526 to 0.750 

for 3/8" OD, 0.788 to 1.12 

Z _< 0.125" 

W < 0.031" 

for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 

for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 

for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 

for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 

Reference temp. 

Probe Thermocouple 

Certification 

certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe ID # ESP- 74B meets or exceeds all specifications, criteria and/or applicable design features and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor Cp of 0.84 

Certified and Calibrated By: 

Date Certified: 

Lalan R. Kirby 

12/21/2007 

Annual Calibration 

86 
Tom Lotz 

ENTEC Services, nc. 

16-D Commerce Ave.Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Calibration Date: 12/31/2007 Calibrated by: 

Annual Thermocouple Calibrations 

Entec Services Temperature **Reference Thermocouple ID Number Source Temperature Temperature 

TC-1 ambient 66 65 

TC-2 ambient 66 65 

TC-3 ambient 66 66 

TC-4 ambient 66 67 

TC-6 ambient 66 66 

TC-7 ambient 66 65 

TC-8 ambient 66 65 

TC-11 ambient 66 65 

TC-12 ambient 66 66 

TC-13 ambient 66 67 

TC-14 ambient 66 67 

TC-15 ambient 66 65 

TC-16 ambient 66 65 

TC-17 ambient 66 65 

TC-19 ambient 66 66 

TC-20 ambient 66 65 

TC-21 ambient 66 67 

TC-22 ambient 66 66 

TC-23 ambient 66 65 

TC-24 ambient 66 65 

Difference 

Degrees F 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Within 

Tolerance 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

TCS- ambient 66 65 Yes 

TCS 2 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TCS 3 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TCS 4 ambient 66 67 Yes 

TCS 5 ambient 66 66 0 Yes 

TCS 7 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TSC -8 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TSC -9 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TSC -10 ambient 66 66 0 Yes 

TSC -11 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TSC -12 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TSC -13 ambient 66 66 0 Yes 

TSC -14 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TSC -15 ambient 66 65 Yes 

TSC 16 ambient 66 67 Yes 

Fluke Hand Held ambient 66 66 0 Yes 

Fluke Hand Held 2 ambient 66 66 0 Yes 

Fluke Hand Held 3 ambient 66 66 0 Yes 

ce within ..I, /- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. 

Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer Serial Number 72083241 was used as reference temperature 

87 
ENTEC Services, 

16-D Commerce Ave.Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Calibration Date: 12/31/2007 Calibrated by: Tom Lotz 

Annual Hot Box Thermocouple Calibrations 

Entec Services Temperature **Reference Thermocouple Difference Within 

D Number Source Temperature Temperature Degrees F Tolerance 

HOTBOX ambient 66 67 2 Yes 

HOTBOX 2 ambient 66 67 2 Yes 

HOTBOX 3 ambient 66 66 2 Yes 

HOTBOX 4 ambient 66 65 Yes 

HOTBOX 5 ambient 66 67 2 Yes 

HOTBOX 6 ambient 66 67 Yes 

HOTBOX 7 ambient 66 66 2 Yes 

HOTBOX 8 ambient 66 66 Yes 

HOTBOX 9 ambient 66 65 0 Yes 

HOTBOX 10 ambient 66 65 Yes 

HOTBOX 11 ambient 66 67 Yes 

HOTBOX 12 ambient 66 67 Yes 

HOTBOX 13 ambient 66 65 Yes 

HOTBOX 14 ambient 66 67 Yes 

Temperature tolerance within +/- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. 

Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer Serial Number 72083241 was used as reference temperature 

88 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerc, e Ave.Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Calibration Date: 12/31/2007 Calibrated by: Tom Lotz 

Annual Gooseneck Thermocoup e Calibrations 

Entec Services Temperature **Reference Thermocouple Difference Within 

ID Number Source Temperature Temperature Degrees F Tolerance 

GN-1 ambient 65 65 Yes 

GN-2 ambient 65 66 Yes 

GN-3 ambient 65 65 Yes 

GN-4 ambient 65 64 0 Yes 

GN-5 ambient 65 65 Yes 

GN-6 ambient 65 64 0 Yes 

GN-7 ambient 65 63 Yes 

GN-8 ambient 65 65 Yes 

GN-9 aml•ient 65 66 Yes 

GN-10 ambient 65 65 Yes 

GN-11 ambient 65 65 0 Yes 

GN-12 ambient 65 66 Yes 

GN-13 ambient 65 64 2 Yes 

GN-14 ambient 65 64 Yes 

GN-15 (Mini HB ambient 65 66 Yes 

GN-16 (Mini HB) ambient 65 65 2 Yes 

GN-17 ambient 65 64 Yes 

GN-18 (Mini HB) ambient 65 66 Yes 

GN-19 (Mini HB) ambient 65 66 Yes 

GN-20 (Mini HB) ambient 65 65 Yes 

GN-21 ambient 65 64 Yes 

ambient 65 65 Yes 

tolerance within ÷/- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. 

Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer Serial Number 72083241 was used as reference temperature 

89 
9O 
Safety Documentation 
Pollution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Testing 

DAILY PROJECT SAFETY MEETING FORM 

(Toolbox Safety Meeting) 

Meeting Coordinator:j•=• 

Topic 

Job Title: • 

of Safety Meeting: • / co •.•- • L,J• • ¢ 

inform•tion Discussed: • C)',•=. • 

• • ,• • • • 

Required PPE: (Check Required) 

• Hard Hat __• 

• Steel Toed Boots 

• Safety Glasses 

Ear Plugs 

• Gloves / Hot Gloves 

Other Requirements; (List as needed) 

Safety Harness or Fall Protection 

Special Clothing (Blues / Greens / Tyvex) 

CO Personnel Monitor 

Respirator (w/PM or Gas Cartridges) 

Long Sleeve Shirt 

Attendees: Name (Print) 

5) 

Signature 

6) 

7) 

8) 

9) 

Facility required additional safety training prior to entering site: 

Video Safety Class• Literature • 

Rev 3: -3-06 

•r No 

Training Clas• (MSHA) 

92 
Test Nomenclature and Calculations 
NOMENCLATURE 

TV•o 

TVwstd 

mm 

Tstd 

Vr• 

V• 

Vma 

Vmstd 

V. 

Vwcstd 

Vwsgstd 

Wimp 

Wsg 

Y 

Cross-sectional area of stack, square feet 

Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet 

Actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions Proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream 

Particulate concentration in stack gas, gr/dscf Particulate concentration in stack gas, gr/acf Pitot tube coefficient 

Pressure drop across orifice meter, inches water 

Velocity head of stack gas, inches water 

Cubic feet of dry gas corrected to standard conditions Excess Air 

Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/mmBtu 

F-factor, 9640 dscf/MMBTU's of heat input Constant (85.49) 

Total particulate matter collected, mg 

Molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, Ib/Ib-mole 

Molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, Ib/Ib-mole 

Percent of isokinetic sampling Barometric pressure, inches mercury 

Stack static pressure, inches of water 

Barometric pressure of dry gas meter, in. mercury 

Particulate mass rate, pounds/hour 

Absolute stack gas pressure, inches mercury 

Barometric pressure, standard conditions, 29.92 inches Hg Volumetric flow rate, actual conditions, ACF/min 

Volumetric flow rate, standard conditions, scf/min 

Volumetric flow rate, dry standard conditions, dscf/min 

Theoretical water vapor in the gas stream based on saturated stack conditions, proportion by volume (dimensionless) 

Theoretical volume of water collected based on saturated stack conditions, ml Theoretical volume of water vapor in the gas sample based on saturated stack conditions, corrected to standard temperature and pressure, scf 

Absolute average dry gas meter temperature, degree R (460) Absolute average stack gas temperature, degree R (460) Absolute temperature at standard conditions, 528 R 

Total sampling time, minutes 

Total volume collected in impingers and silica gel, gr 

Volume of gas sampled through gas meter, cubic feet 

Volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, ACF 

Stack gas volume sampled, ACF 

Volume of gas sampled through gas meter, cubic feet 

Average stack gas velocity, feet/sec 

Volume of water vapor in gas sampled from impingers, standard cubic feet Volume of water vapor in gas sampled from silica gel, standard cubic feet Total volume collected in impingers, gr 

Total volume collected in silica gel, gr 

Dry gas meter calibration factor 

94 
EQUATIONS 

TEST CALCULATIONS 

DLA inlet- Run 1 

1. Ps=Pbar+(Pg/13"6) •O"ii• + 

2. Pm=Pbar+(AH/13"6) 30-• 

3. V•ta=17.64* V•* Y* (P=•) 17.64"( 

4a. V•c(std) 0.04706* Wisp 0.04706*( 

4b. Vwsg(std) 0.04715 W,g 0.04715"( 

5. B,.= Vwstd/(Vmstd + Vwstd) •, 

For saturated sources (No. 6 8 only): 

• TBws= (1 0 6.37- {2827/(ts+365)}/p, 

• TVwste= V•ste*( TB•s/1- TB•s) 

• TV•o= TV•st•0.04707 

10. 

11. 

12. 

14. 

15. 

21. 

22. 

10637{2827/( +364.8)}/( 

)*( )/(1 )= 

)/( )= 

Me= 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28((100-(%CO2+%O2)) 0.44( • )+0.32( i'7 )+0.28(100-( ,• + 

Ms=Md(1-Bws)+18B,s= (2•o1(O )*(1- ,(• (8%• )+18( 

Vs= 85.49* Cp* •/AP* •/[Ts / (Ms* Ps)] 

=85.49*(0.84)*( ,5• 5 )%/( •--8,59 

ea Vs* As* 60 (Z'•,•I $1 & )( )(60) 

Qs Qa* (528/Ts)*(Ps/29.92) )*(528/ )*( /29.92) 

Qs'd Qa (1- B•,s) (528/Ts)*(Ps/29.92) 

/ )= 

)*20.9)/(20.9-( )} 

C•=0.01543" (ME Vmstd) 0.01543"( 

E/Btu= (Cs/7000)*{(Fd*20.9)/(20.9-%O2)} /7000)*{( 

%EA= 100%* {(%O2)-0.5*(%CO)} / {0.264(%N2) (%02)+ 0.5*(%CO)} 100%*{( )-0.5( )} / {0.264( )-( 

)*( 

)+0.5( 

)*(60/7000) PMR= Cs* Qstd (60/7000) 

V•=Ts/Ps*{(0.002669) V•o+ (V• Y Pm)FFm)} (•, 5 / ,I•#9•,•)*{(0"002669)( 

Ca=0.01543" (Mn/Vn) 0.01543"( / )= 

I=Vn100/(60*•9*Vs*An) 

95