63968 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 1997 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health

Administration

[Docket No. ICR–97–10]

Agency Information Collection

Activities; Announcement of OMB

Approval

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health

Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and

Health Administration (OSHA) is

announcing that a collection of

information regarding the recording of

occupational injuries and illnesses has

been approved by the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) under

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

This document announces the OMB

approval number and expiration date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stephen Newell, Office of Statistics,

Occupational Safety and Health

Administration, U.S. Department of

Labor, Room N3507, 200 Constitution

Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20210,

telephone (202) 219–6463.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the

Federal Register of April 22, 1997 (62

FR 19,621), the Agency announced its

intent to request renewal of its current

OMB approval for 29 CFR 1904,

Recording and Reporting Occupational

Injuries and Illnesses (less 1904.8,

Reporting of Fatality or Multiple

Hospitalization Incidents and 1904.17,

Annual OSHA Injury and Illness Survey

of Ten or More Employers). In

accordance with the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–

3520), OMB has renewed its approval

for the information collection and

assigned OMB control number 1218–

0176. The approval expires 12/31/1998.

Under 5 CFR 1320.5(b), an Agency may

not conduct or sponsor, and a person is

not required to respond to, a collection

of information unless the collection

displays a valid control number.

Dated: November 25, 1997.

Stephen A. Newell,

Director, OSHA Office of Statistics.

[FR Doc. 97–31604 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–26–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket 70–7001]

Notice of Amendment to Certificate of

Compliance GDP–1 for the U.S.

Enrichment Corporation, Paducah

Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah,

Kentucky

The Director, Office of Nuclear

Material Safety and Safeguards, has

made a determination that the following

amendment request is not significant in

accordance with 10 CFR 76.45. In

making that determination the staff

concluded that: (1) There is no change

in the types or significant increase in

the amounts of any effluents that may be

released offsite; (2) there is no

significant increase in individual or

cumulative occupational radiation

exposure; (3) there is no significant

construction impact; (4) there is no

significant increase in the potential for,

or radiological or chemical

consequences from, previously analyzed

accidents; (5) the proposed changes do

not result in the possibility of a new or

different kind of accident; (6) there is no

significant reduction in any margin of

safety; and (7) the proposed changes

will not result in an overall decrease in

the effectiveness of the plant’s safety,

safeguards or security programs. The

basis for this determination for the

amendment request is shown below.

The NRC staff has reviewed the

certificate amendment application and

concluded that it provides reasonable

assurance of adequate safety, safeguards,

and security, and compliance with NRC

requirements. Therefore, the Director,

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards, is prepared to issue an

amendment to the Certificate of

Compliance for the Paducah Gaseous

Diffusion Plant. The staff has prepared

a Compliance Evaluation Report which

provides details of the staff’s evaluation.

The NRC staff has determined that

this amendment satisfies the criteria for

a categorical exclusion in accordance

with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant

to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental

impact statement or environmental

assessment need be prepared for this

amendment.

USEC or any person whose interest

may be affected may file a petition, not

exceeding 30 pages, requesting review

of the Director’s Decision. The petition

must be filed with the Commission not

later than 15 days after publication of

this Federal Register notice. A petition

for review of the Director’s Decision

shall set forth with particularity the

interest of the petitioner and how that

interest may be affected by the results of

the decision. The petition should

specifically explain the reasons why

review of the Decision should be

permitted with particular reference to

the following factors: (1) The interest of

the petitioner; (2) how that interest may

be affected by the Decision, including

the reasons why the petitioner should

be permitted a review of the Decision;

and (3) the petitioner’s areas of concern

about the activity that is the subject

matter of the Decision. Any person

described in this paragraph (USEC or

any person who filed a petition) may

file a response to any petition for

review, not to exceed 30 pages, within

10 days after filing of the petition. If no

petition is received within the

designated 15-day period, the Director

will issue the final amendment to the

Certificate of Compliance without

further delay. If a petition for review is

received, the decision on the

amendment application will become

final in 60 days, unless the Commission

grants the petition for review or

otherwise acts within 60 days after

publication of this Federal Register

notice.

A petition for review must be filed

with the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington,

DC 20555–0001, Attention: Rulemakings

and Adjudications Staff, or may be

delivered to the Commission’s Public

Document Room, the Gelman Building,

2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC, by

the above date.

For further details with respect to the

action see (1) the application for

amendment and (2) the Commission’s

Compliance Evaluation Report. These

items are available for public inspection

at the Commission’s Public Document

Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L

Street, NW, Washington, DC, and at the

Local Public Document Room.

Date of amendment request: October

6, 1997.

Brief description of amendment: The

amendment proposes to revise

Technical Safety Requirement (TSR)

2.3.4.7 and TSR 2.4.4.2, Criticality

Accident Alarm System (CAAS) for

Product and Tails Withdrawal and

Cascade Facilities, to provide a cross

reference for the Required Actions in

order to assure all necessary Required

Actions are performed when the C–310

CAAS is inoperable.

Basis for finding of no significance: 1.

The proposed amendment will not

result in a change in the types or

significant increase in the amounts of

any effluents that may be released

offsite.

The proposed changes are related to

human factors and do not change any

requirements. There are no associated