alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Public Comment Draft

11/20/23

FORM OF PROCESS AND CONTROLS ATTESTATION OF INDEPENDENT 

AUDITOR

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT PROCESS AND CONTROLS ATTESTATION OF

[RECIPIENT]’S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

In connection with that certain Letter Agreement, dated [ ], 20[ ] (the “Agreement”) 

by and between [RECIPIENT] (the “Recipient”) and the United States Department of the Treasury 

(the “Investor”), the undersigned does hereby attest as follows:

1. We are independent auditors for the Recipient.

2. We were engaged by the Recipient to perform an agreed-upon procedures engagement with 

respect to the Recipient’s [Initial Supplemental Report/Quarterly Supplemental Reports] 

filed and/or amended during the fiscal year completed on [DATE] and conducted our 

engagement in accordance with attestation standards established by the AICPA. Our report 

regarding this agreed-upon procedures engagement is attached as Appendix A hereto.

3. We acknowledge that a knowing and willful false or fraudulent statement made in 

connection with this certification may be punished by fine, imprisonment, or both. (See, 

for example, 18 U.S.C. 1001).

The foregoing attestations are made and delivered as of [ ] pursuant to 

Section 4.1(d)(ii) of the Agreement.

Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them 

in the Agreement unless otherwise stated.

[Signature page follows]
Public Comment Draft

11/20/23

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Attestation has been duly executed and delivered as of the [ ] 

day of [ ], 20[ ].

[AUDITOR]

By:

Name:

Title:
#### Robert M. TROMBLEY, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, an agency of the State of Florida, and W. Wesley Wallace, Respondents.

No. 77-1740.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 27, 1977.

David T. Price of Price & Byrne, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Louis B. Guttman, III, Staff Counsel, Fla. Real Estate Com’n, Winter Park, for respondent.

DOWNEY, Judge.

ON MOTION FOR STAY

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes (1975), the petitioner has requested this court, pending appeal, to stay the final order of the respondent which suspended the petitioner’s Registration for a period of one year. The statute authorizes either the respondent or this court to enter such a stay. Fla.App. Rule 5.5 provides that a party seeking to supersede a final decision, judgment, order or decree shall apply to the lower court for an order fixing the amount, terms and conditions of a supersedeas bond.

Generally the district courts of appeal have required one seeking to stay a final agency order to first apply to the agency for a supersedeas before applying to the reviewing court. *See Ziers v. Purdy,*324 So.2d 132 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); *Panama City v. The Florida Public Employees Relations Commission,*333 So.2d 470 (Fla.1st DCA 1976). We believe this to be the better procedure because the agency is in a better position to determine, at least initially, whether its final order should be superseded and, if so, the terms and conditions of the bond.

Accordingly, the motion for an order setting supersedeas and staying the final order under review is denied without prejudice to petitioner’s applying to the respondent for a stay order.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35141-35162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14907]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 22 and 190

RIN Number 3038-AC99

Protection of Cleared Swaps Customer Contracts and Collateral; 
Conforming Amendments to the Commodity Broker Bankruptcy Provisions; 
Correction

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the formatting of text and charts 
published in the Federal Register of June 09, 2011 (76 FR 33818), 
regarding Protection of Cleared Swaps Customer Contracts and 
Collateral; Conforming Amendments to the Commodity Broker Bankruptcy 
Provisions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Wasserman, 202-418-5092 or M. 
Laura Astrada, 202-418-7622.

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2011-10737, in the issue of Thursday, 
June 09, 2011, on page 33864, in the last column, the text which begins 
``1. Sufficient Funds to Meet Non-XM and XM Customer Claims:'' through 
to the end of the chart on page 33877 should be replaced with the 
following:
BILLING CODE-P

[[Page 35142]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.007

[[Page 35143]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.008

[[Page 35144]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.009

[[Page 35145]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.010

[[Page 35146]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.011

[[Page 35147]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.012

[[Page 35148]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.013

[[Page 35149]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.014

[[Page 35150]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.015

[[Page 35151]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.016

[[Page 35152]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.017

[[Page 35153]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.018

[[Page 35154]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.019

[[Page 35155]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.020

[[Page 35156]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.021

[[Page 35157]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.022

[[Page 35158]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.023

[[Page 35159]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.024

[[Page 35160]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.025

[[Page 35161]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.026

[[Page 35162]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN11.027

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 10, 2011 by the Commission.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-14907 Filed 6-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE-C
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                          $1,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  649,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    625,244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,305,997
<PP&E>                                         538,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                 272,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,748,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,109,618
<BONDS>                                        318,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       240,057
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,748,614
<SALES>                                      1,070,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,070,892
<CGS>                                        1,016,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,016,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,809)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        87
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,896)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (6,484)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---






---
#### Roy MOSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-151.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Paul Morris, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0361. ANTHONY LOWREY v. THE STATE.

On April 8, 2015, Anthony Lowrey filed a pro se application for discretionary

appeal, seeking review of an order revoking his probation. Although he mentions a

2014 probation revocation, the only order included with his application is a probation

revocation order signed on January 4, 2011. We lack jurisdiction.

To be valid, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30

days after the entry of the appealable order, and this Court lacks jurisdiction to

consider an untimely application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App.

582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). Here, the only order Lowrey included with his 2015

application materials wassigned by the judge in 2011. However, it was not a stamped

“filed” copy, as required by Court of Appeals Rule 31 (e). A stamped “filed” copy

is required in order for this Court to ascertain that the application was filed within 30

days after entry of the appealable order. On April 14, 2015, this Court ordered

Lowrey to supplement his application within 10 days with a stamped “filed” copy of

the order to be appealed. We noted that failure to comply with this directive would

result in dismissal of the application. Lowrey failed to submit a stamped “filed” copy

of the trial court’s order within the additional time allowed. Accordingly, this

application is hereby DISMISSED.

We note, however, that Lowrey contends he is unable to comply with Court of

Appeals Rule 31 (e) because the trial court failed to provide him with a copy of his

2014 order. If Lowrey did not receive timely notice of the order, his remedy is to

petition the trial court to vacate and re-enter the order as a means of correcting the

problem. See id.; Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147, 148-149 (1) (269 SE2d

May 06, 2015
426) (1980). The re-entry of the order will begin anew the time for filing a notice of

appeal in the trial court. See Cambron, supra.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/06/2015
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006,
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael R. ColtraneMichael R. ColtraneChief Executive OfficerNovember 3, 2006/s/ James E. HausmanJames E. HausmanChief Financial OfficerNovember 3, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
M. O'Donnell, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Joseph M. O'Donnell
-----------------------
Joseph M. O'Donnell
Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
# Table 1

# Table 2

# Table 3

# Table 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      34,175,250               6,957,672
<SECURITIES>                                36,998,971              32,868,158
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,250,510              18,536,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,500                 107,500
<INVENTORY>                                  3,176,464               2,666,858
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            56,296,455              25,349,607
<PP&E>                                     257,963,740             213,503,249
<DEPRECIATION>                             114,880,456             103,463,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             281,765,216             209,459,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,038,905              20,391,286
<BONDS>                                     39,000,000              20,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          112,500                 125,000
<PREFERRED>                                    397,000                 398,000
<COMMON>                                    42,472,662              38,206,596
<OTHER-SE>                                 138,145,920             101,270,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               281,765,216             209,459,250
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            85,450,227              78,028,257
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               72,698,987              61,293,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (52,781,043)            (15,644,270)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,058,192               1,928,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             62,474,091              30,449,988
<INCOME-TAX>                                24,970,647              12,422,328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         37,503,444              18,027,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                37,503,444              18,027,660
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.99                    0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.98                    0.96




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000023055
<NAME> GROUP 1 SOFTWARE, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,295
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,808
<PP&E>                                           3,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,092
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        916
<COMMON>                                         2,014
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,275
<SALES>                                         14,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,561
<CGS>                                           13,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   725
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    732
<INCOME-TAX>                                       271
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                373
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       373
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
# L_2006323EN.01004301.xml

| 22.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/43

---

Second amending budget of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for 2006

(2006/764/EC, Euratom)

Pursuant to Article 26(2) of the Financial Regulation of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), adopted by the Management Board on 10 June 2004, ‘the budget and amending budgets, as finally adopted, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union
  ’.

Official Journal of the European Union

The second amending budget of the EMEA for 2006 was adopted by the Management Board on 13 October 2006 (MB/395491/2006).

| (in EUR) |
| --- |
| Item | Description | Budget 2004 | Budget 2005 | Budget 2006 | Amendments | Revised budget 2006 |
| Revenue |
| 1 0 0 | Fee collected | 67 350 400 | 77 455 000 | 83 580 000 | 9 000 000 | 92 580 000 |
| 2 0 1 | Special contribution for orphan medicinal products | 3 985 264 | 5 000 000 | 6 400 000 | 1 000 000 | 7 400 000 |
| | | | | | 10 000 000 | |
| | Total Budget | 99 385 425 | 111 835 000 | 128 676 000 | 10 000 000 | 138 676 000 |
| Expenditure |
| 3 0 1 0 | Evaluation of medicinal products | 28 866 966 | 29 232 000 | 37 058 000 | 9 000 000 | 46 058 000 |
| 3 0 1 1 | Evaluation of designated orphan medicinal products | 2 789 360 | 5 485 000 | 4 476 000 | 1 000 000 | 5 476 000 |
| | | | | | 10 000 000 | |
| | Total Budget | 96 714 409 | 111 835 000 | 128 676 000 | 10 000 000 | 138 676 000 |

(in EUR)

Item

Description

Budget 2004

Budget 2005

Budget 2006

Amendments

Revised budget 2006

Revenue

1 0 0

1 0 0

Fee collected

Fee collected

67 350 400

77 455 000

83 580 000

9 000 000

92 580 000

2 0 1

2 0 1

Special contribution for orphan medicinal products

Special contribution for orphan medicinal products

3 985 264

5 000 000

6 400 000

1 000 000

7 400 000

10 000 000

10 000 000

Total Budget

Total Budget

99 385 425

99 385 425

111 835 000

111 835 000

128 676 000

128 676 000

10 000 000

10 000 000

138 676 000

138 676 000

Expenditure

3 0 1 0

Evaluation of medicinal products

28 866 966

29 232 000

37 058 000

9 000 000

46 058 000

3 0 1 1

Evaluation of designated orphan medicinal products

2 789 360

5 485 000

4 476 000

1 000 000

5 476 000

10 000 000

10 000 000

Total Budget

Total Budget

96 714 409

96 714 409

111 835 000

111 835 000

128 676 000

128 676 000

10 000 000

10 000 000

138 676 000

138 676 000

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-1238-001]


CSW Power Marketing, Inc.; Notice of Filing

November 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on June 19, 1997, CSW Power Marketing, Inc. 
tendered its revised statement of policy and code of conduct with 
respect to the relationship with CSW Operating Companies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before December 5, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31642 Filed 12-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 11

ALASKA TRONWORKERS PENSION PLAN

PLAN SPONSOR CERTIFICATION RELATING TO PLAN AMENDMENTS

Pursuant to Section 6.07 of IRS Revenue Procedure 2017-43, the undersigned Trustees
hereby certify that if, upon final authorization to implement the proposed suspension plan as
described in Section 432(e)(9)(H)(vi) of the Code, the Board of Trustees chooses to implement the
suspension plan, the following plan amendments will be timely adopted and not modified at any
time thereafter before the suspension of benefits expires:

(1) A plan amendment providing that in accordance with § 432(e)(9)(C)(ii) the benefit
suspension will cease as of the first day of the first plan year following the plan year in
which the plan sponsor fails to maintain a written record of its determination that both:

a. All reasonable measures to avoid insolvency continue to be taken during the period
of benefit suspension; and

b. the plan is projected to become insolvent unless benefits continue to be suspended.

(2) A plan amendment providing that any future benefit improvements must satisfy the
requirements of § 432(e)(9)(E) of the Code.

12-15-/7
‘aul Carr, Chairman Date
Board of Trustees

efethz
. Date
Board of Trustees

(00762828)

AIPT 157