alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representatives 

before the Department of the Treasury 

for the 

Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers LocalS New York Retirement Fund Pension Plan 

Applicant 

The Board of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local 5 New York Retirement Fund Pension 

Plan 

1 Scobie Drive 

Newburgh, NY 12550 

Contact: Mike Clifford 

T: (845) 565-8344 

F: (914) 423-1135 

E: mclifford@bac5ny.com 

Plan Number: 001 

Plan EIN: 14-6016608 

Applicant hereby appoints the following representative(s) as attomey(s)-in-fact to represent the 

taxpayer before the Department of the Treasury and perform acts related to the attached 

application dated June 23, 2016 for suspension of benefits under §432(e)(9) of the Intemal 

Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 

Representatives' information: 

Craig A. Voelker 

O'Sullivan Associates 

1236 Brace Road, UnitE 

Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 

T: (856) 795-7777 x214 

Fax: (856) 795-7779 

E: cvoelker@osullivanassociates.com 

Enrolled Actuary No: 14-05537 

Send copies of notices and communications to representative: YES. 

With the exception of the acts described below, I authorize my representative(s) to receive and 

inspect my confidential tax information and to perform acts that I can perform with respect to the 

attached application dated June 23, 2016 for suspension of benefits under § 432(e)(9). For 

example, my representative(s) shall have the authority to sign any agreements, consents, or 

similar documents. 

Specific acts not authorized: None. 
Name: Name: 

Date: __ £_-_2-_3_ ...... _2-o_ J _lo ____ _ 

Title: Union Trustee Title: Employer Trustee 

Date: b- )_7J- W 1-f> ----~----~------------------

Title: Union Trustee Title: Employer Trustee 

Declaration of Representatives 

Under penalties of perjury, by my signature below I declare that: 

• I am not cutTently suspended or disbarred from practice before the Internal Revenue 

Service; 

• I am authorized to represent the Applicant for the matter(s) specified in this Power of 

Attorney and Declaration of Representative; and 

• I am one of the following: 

a) Attorney - a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of the 

jurisdiction shown below. 

b) Certified Public Accountant - duly qualified to practice as a certified public 

accountant in the jurisdiction shown below. 

c) Enrolled Agent 

d) Officer - a bona fide officer of the Applicant. 

e) Full-Time Employee- a full-time employee of the Applicant 

f) Enrolled Actuary - enrolled as an actuary by the Joint Board for the Enrollment of 

Actuaries under 29 U.S.C. 1242 (the authority to practice before the Internal Revenue 

Service is limited by section 1 0.3( d) of Circular 230). 

g) Enrolled Retirement Plan Agent 

Required infmmation for Representative: See information presented above. 

Signature of Representative and Date: 

Redacted by the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury 

... ~-

Date
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40587 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. IRINEO LOPEZ-GUZMAN, also known as Hector Hernandez-Montero Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-12-1
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Irineo Lopez-Guzman raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and nota separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Trade Link Wholesalers Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Natalia Gaubina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Natalia Gaubina                                                                           

Natalia Gaubina

Chief Executive Officer

 

Dated: December 1, 2010

 

 

----
# ISR CU
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael R. ColtraneMichael R. ColtraneChief Executive OfficerAugust 3, 2007/s/ James E. HausmanJames E. HausmanChief Financial OfficerAugust 3, 2007
I j STAnt OF MisSOURI

J ere.'lliah W. (J a y ) Nixo n,Governor

•Sara Parker Pa uley, D irecmr DEPARTMENT OF NATURJ\l RESOURCES MAY 1 1 2011 Mr. Karl Brooks Regional Administrator U

.S. EPA, Region VII 901 North Fifth Street Kansas City, KS 66101 Dear Mr. Brooks

:
www.dn

r.m o.gov RECEIVED MAY 1 g2011 AWMD/APDB On June 10, 2009, the Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program submitted

a request for the EPA to include an amendment
to state regulation 10 CSR 10-6.061, Construction Permit ExemJilions,
in the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP). This **~Ie amendti1~0o** 

**'**CSR **10~6~ 061,** added an exemption from construction permits for the construction oftemporary storage structures that result from the occurrence of exceptional events. After discussing this matter with your staff, the Air Program
is withdrawing the June 10, 2009 request to amend the Missouri SIP because inclusion of this rule amendment into the Missouri SIP is not necessary

.Sources maystill obtain temporary permits under section (3) of 10 CSR 10 -6.060 Construction Permit rule to address these circumstances. Thank youfor yourattention to this matter. If youhave any questions regarding this S IP revision withdrawal, please contact meat the Department's Air Pollution Control

**,** Program,

P .0 .Box 176, Jefferson City

,MO 65102, or by phone at (573) 751-4817

. Sincerely

, AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM J L K:src
H. R. 2044 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 17 East 

Main Street in Herington, Kansas, as the ‘‘Captain Emil J. Kapaun Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN EMIL J. KAPAUN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 17 East Main Street in Herington, Kansas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain Emil J. Kapaun Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Captain Emil J. Kapaun Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-55-000]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

November 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 20, 1997, Transwestern Pipeline 
Company (Transwestern) submits for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, 
proposed to become effective on December 20, 1997:

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 1
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 1A
Third Revised Sheet No. 116
First Revised Sheet No. 116A
First Revised Sheet No. 116B
First Revised Sheet No. 116C
Second Revised Sheet No. 117
First Revised Sheet No. 117A
First Revised Sheet No. 117B
Second Revised Sheet No. 118
First Revised Sheet No. 119A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 126
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 127
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 128
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 129
First Revised Sheet No. 129A
Second Revised Sheet No. 130
Second Revised Sheet No. 138
First Revised Sheet No. 139
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 140
First Revised Sheet No. 142
Third Revised Sheet No. 143

    Transwestern states that these tariff sheets are being filed to 
simplify and shorten Transwestern's form of Service Agreement under 
Rate Schedules FTS-1 (including the Form D applicable to capacity 
release) and ITS-1.
    Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Transwestern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestant a party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31541 Filed 12-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2123 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2123

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
to require regulated entities to provide information necessary for the 
Offices of Women and Minority Inclusion to carry out their duties, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2021

 Mrs. Beatty (for herself and Ms. Williams of Georgia) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
to require regulated entities to provide information necessary for the 
Offices of Women and Minority Inclusion to carry out their duties, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Diversity and Inclusion Data 
Accountability and Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURES BY REGULATED ENTITIES.

    Section 342(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5452(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(5) Disclosures by regulated entities.--The Director of 
        each Office shall require entities with 100 employees or 
        greater regulated by the applicable agency to provide such 
        information as may be required to carry out the duties of the 
        Director.''.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131576 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131576 

 COA: 266102 

Charlevoix CC: 00-032819-NO 

FRANCES LADI, LAURA LEE WILSON, 

SHANNON WILSON, MARK SOKOLOWSKI, 

LISA SOKOLOWSKI, CHARLES CRADDUCK, 

DIANE CRADDUCK, DEBRA A. YAGER, 

Individually and as Personal Representative of the 

Estate of MARK R. YAGER, Deceased, 

MEAGAN YAGER, MARK A. YAGER, KATI 

YAGER, EMILY YAGER, MARCELLA YAGER 

TADEUSZ DOBROWOLSKI, JEANETTE 

DOBROWOLSKI, CHRISTOPHER 

DOBROWOLSKI, ADAM DOBROWOLSKI, 

KYLE DOBROWOLSKI, SECOND CHANCE 

BODY ARMOR, INC., RICHARD DAVIS, 

MICHAEL J. JAYE, CURTIS GLENN 

CRAWFORD, and LAWRENCE GRISE,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 29, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33, 799]


West Virginia Shoe Company, Marlinton, West Virginia; Dismissal 
of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Acting Director of the Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at West Virginia Shoe Company, 
Marlinton, West Virginia. The review indicated that the application 
contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly 
on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

TA-W-33, 799; West Virginia Shoe Company, Marlinton, West Virginia 
(November 6, 1997)

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 6th day of November, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-31046 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
                                     RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                             TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
                                           (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 MARCH           MARCH
                                                                  2000            1999
                                                                ----------     ----------

<S>                                                             <C>            <C>
EARNINGS
        Net Income                                              $  708,108     $  752,011
        Federal Income Tax                                         357,604        424,515
                                                                ----------     ----------

                   Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax      1,065,712      1,176,526

FIXED CHARGES*                                                     347,937        345,739
                                                                ----------     ----------
                   Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax
                      and Fixed Charges                         $1,413,649     $1,522,265
                                                                ==========     ==========



        * Fixed Charges

        Interest on Long-Term Debt                              $  292,921     $  291,664
        Amortization of Debt Discount, Premium and Expense          13,246         13,791
        Interest Component of Rentals                               17,770         18,297
        Other Interest                                              24,000         21,987
                                                                ----------     ----------

                   Total Fixed Charges                          $  347,937     $  345,739
                                                                ==========     ==========



        Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                            4.06           4.40
</TABLE>
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

73) IV-E-67 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/2008 11:58:00 AM Sheet 73 of 117 
P.2 

A-9o-3* 

August 1,2000 

SUBJECT: Presentation at 2000 EPA Regional/State/Local Agency Modelers Workshop 

FROM: 

TO: 

Dan deRoeck, Environmental Engineer 

Information Transfer and Program Integration Division, OAQPS 

Air Docket # A-90-37 

On June 15,2000,1 gave a 30-minute presentation by telephone on the NSR Reform 

Rulemaking to the Modelers Workshop held in Arlington, Virginia. The presentation focused on 

the provisions addressing Class I area protection-an area of interest to EPA's Regional Office 

modelers and State and local agency modelers. Following a summary of the proposal, I 

responded to several questions from the audience. Nothing said during the question & answer 

period was cause for any changes being made to the rulemaking package. 

cc: Pam Smith (MD-12) 

EPA AIR DOCKET
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   August                    14, 2007 | By:    | /s/                    Charles N. Eldred        |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |   | Charles                    N. Eldred            |
|                                                      |   | Executive                    Vice President and |
|                                                      |   | Chief                    Financial Officer      |
|                                                      |   | PNM                    Resources, Inc.          |
#### Herbert MAGNES and Martin Magnes, Appellants, v. Michael BLOOM et al., Appellee.

No. 77-1468.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Clair White and Eugene L. Heinrich, of McCune, Hiaasen, Crum, Ferris & Gardner, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Stephen N. Lipton, of Becker, Poliakoff & Sachs, P. A., Miami Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, C. J., BERANEK, J., and BAKER, JOSEPH P., Associate Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33, 404]


Devoe & Raynolds Company, Louisville, Kentucky; Notice of 
Negative Determination on Reconsideration

    On July 18, 1997, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The petitioner presented new 
evidence regarding company imports of paint. The notice was published 
in the Federal Register on August 1, 1997 (62 FR 41424).
    The Department initially denied TAA to workers of Devoe & Raynolds 
Company, Louisville, Kentucky because the ``contributed importantly'' 
group eligibility requirement of Section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended, was not met. The workers at the subject firm produced 
latex and alkyd paints. The layoffs at the Louisville plant were 
attributed to the corporate decision to consolidate operations with 
that of the parent company's domestic plants in Texas, Ohio, 
Pennsylvania, and Florida. The parent company did not import paint from 
foreign sources.
    New findings on reconsideration show that the parent company of 
Devoe & Raynolds, ICI Paints, operating in the U.S. as Glidden, had a 
corporate-wide sales increase from 1995 to 1996. Other new findings 
reveal that the company did import paint from its foreign production 
facility. Company imports, however, were negligible, accounting for 
less that 1 percent of corporate-wide sales in 1995 and 1996.

Conclusion

    After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
for workers and former workers of Devoe & Raynolds Company, Louisville, 
Kentucky.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of October 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-31054 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M