alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Thomas A. Franza, Chief Executive Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas A. Franza   
|                         |  |  |  | Thomas A. Franza       
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY and Robert Zielke, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Judith Louise Zielke, Deceased, Appellants, v. Paul J. SCHNEIDER, Jr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Irma R. Schneider, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 77-419.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 23, 1977.

*729Nancy Little Hoffmann of Druck, Grim-mett, Norman, Weaver & Scherer, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Carey M. Fischer of Ferrero, Middle-brooks & Houston, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

ALDERMAN, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the defendants in a wrongful death action, seeking review of a partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability. The defendants raised the affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of the risk, which, since *Hoffman v. Jones,*280 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1973), and *Blackburn*v. *Dorta,*348 So.2d 287 (Fla., opinion filed May 5, 1977), no longer completely bar recovery, but may prevent a plaintiff from recovering that proportion of his damages for which he is responsible. In entering the partial summary judgment, the trial court left only the amount of damages for the determination of the jury. We reverse.

Factually it appears that Mrs. Schneider and Mrs. Zielke were killed in an automobile accident while riding together. Mrs. Schneider was the passenger and Mrs. Zielke was the driver. Mrs. Schneider’s husband owned the car; he instituted the suit for wrongful death against Mrs. Zielke’s estate. The two women had attended a luncheon fashion show at a restaurant and had remained there until late afternoon. There is evidence that both ladies drank alcoholic beverages while they were at the restaurant. The parking attendant felt that Mrs. Schneider was in no condition to drive and refused to turn her car over to her. She asked Mrs. Zielke to drive for her, which Mrs. Zielke did. The car left the road near the foot of a bridge, plunged into water, and both women died.

The law does not favor summary judgments in negligence cases, particularly where defenses of contributory negligence or assumption of the risk are involved, and any doubt should be resolved in favor of a jury trial. *Bess v. 17545 Collins Avenue, Inc.,*98 So.2d 490 (Fla.1957). It is for a jury to determine not only “what happened” in a particular case, but also to choose among the different inferences which may be drawn from the same set of facts, and to decide whether the precise circumstances fit certain legal definitions, which in turn give rise to certain legal consequences. Reasonable men might differ as to the inferences which may be drawn from the facts now before us, and they might disagree as to whether those facts and inferences fit the legal definitions of assumption of the risk and contributory negligence. Accordingly, we reverse the *730order granting partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Daniel R. Lutz,
Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 

| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  December 12, 2003 |  | /S/    DANIEL R. LUTZ  
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | Daniel R. Lutz         
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original copy of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 24, 2013

No. 04-13-00078-CR

Luis GOVEA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

From the 22nd District Court, Hays County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-12-0451

Honorable Billy Ray Subblefield, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The appellate record was complete on March 9, 2013; Appellant’s brief was originally 

due to be filed on April 8, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On April 19, 2013, Appellant filed 

an unopposed first motion for extension of time of to file the brief until May 20, 2013, for an 

extension of forty days. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant must file the brief by May 20, 2013. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of April, 2013.

 ____________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO



SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002.



I, Angel Santodomingo Martell, Chief Financial
Officer of Banco Santander (Brasil), S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.       the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Banco Santander (Brasil), S.A.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 9, 2018



| | By: | /s/ Angel Santodomingo Martell
| | --- | ------------------------------
| |     | Name:                         
| |     | Title:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                           EXHIBIT 11
                                                                         CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                                                          AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    Computation of Earnings Per Share


                                             Three Months Ended June 30                   Six Months Ended June 30
                                              2000                 1999                   2000                1999
Computation of share                          ----                 ----                   ----                ----
totals used in
computing earnings
per share:
<S>                                         <C>                   <C>                   <C>                   <C>

Weighted average number
 of shares outstanding                      18,839,766            18,688,414            18,813,244            18,663,854

Basic average shares
 a-Outstanding                              18,839,766            18,688,414            18,813,244            18,663,854

Incremental shares
 arising, from out-
 standing stock
 options                                       132,536               93,832                127,387              117,894
                                           -----------           ------------           ----------          -----------
 b-Totals                                   18,972,302            18,782,246            18,940,361           18,781,748
                                           ===========           ============           ==========          ===========
c-Net Income                             $   4,862,278      $      9,136,224        $   10,156,899      $    12,999,695
                                           ===========           ============           ==========          ===========
Net Income Per Share
 Basic - c/a                             $        0.26      $           0.49        $         0.54      $         0.70
                                           ===========           ============           ==========          ===========
Net Income Per Share
assuming full dilution c/b               $        0.26      $           0.49        $        0.54       $         0.69
                                           ===========           ============           ==========          ===========



</TABLE>
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0501

SAT Date: 9/18/2012

Print Date: 10/3/2012

Related cases: 

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: No reasonable analogs were found.

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: Yes Exposure based testing (health): Inhalation only

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG, UNCERT-IRR, ONCO

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0501

FATE: 

Solid 

S < 1 mg/L at 25 ° (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 ° (E)

BP > 400 ° (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

PBT Potential: P3B1
*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes based on physical/chemical 

properties. There is concern for lung overload if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

information for other poorly soluble respirable particulates and concern for oncogenicity if 

inhaled if the material is crystalline. If the PMN material has a high pH there is concern for 

irritation. Low moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for mixed metal salts; SAR 

chemical class = mixed metal salt-insoluble; MW > 100,000; solid; S < 0.001 mg/L (P); pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness 

<150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs mixed metal salts

SAR Class mixed metal salt-insoluble

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
#### A. P., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1367.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 31, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and HUB-BART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The only point presented on this appeal urges that the trial court erred in adjudicating respondent delinquent in that the State failed to prove an overt act committed in furtherance of the crime of attempted burglary. Our review of the record in the light of the briefs presented shows that the point is without foundation in that the respondent and several others actually approached a vehicle and removed parts of it. See Sections 810.02 and 777.04, Florida Statutes (1975).

Affirmed.
****

 

 

 

**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Global Bond Fund, a series of DWS Global/International Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSR; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| December 28, 2007 | /s/Michael G. Clark                                                   |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              | Michael G. Clark                                                      |
|              | President                                                             |
|              | DWS Global Bond Fund, a series of DWS Global/International Fund, Inc. |

 

 

----
No. 00-6142.

#### George *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Flightline Ground, Inc.
Complainant V. Louisiana Department Of Transportation And Development, As Successor To The Louisiana Division OfAdministration And The Board Of Commissioners For The Management OfThe Lakefront Airport; Non

-Flood Protection Asset Management Authority, As Successor To The Board OfCommissioners OfThe Orleans Parish Levee District And Orleans Parish Levee District, Division OfNon-Flood Assets. Respondent 

### FAA Docket No. 16

- 11 -0 1

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to on or about January 16, 2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case. 

# ?JA4& t:7{?P
Eduardo A.

# An ;:
Associate Administrator

for Airports

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE '(L--- 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that on 

# De(!_ ( ( 2014, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension of Time addressed to: Complainant Alan Annstrong Attorney at Law 2900 Chamblee Tucker Road Building 5, Suite 350 Atlanta, GA 30341 Counsel for Respondent Brandon Brown, Esq. General Counsel Louisiana Department ofTransportation and Development 1201 Capital Access Road Office S304/S305 Baton Rouge, LA 70804 Gerald G. Metzger, Esq. Charles Curtis, Esq. Metzger Law Firm 829 Baronne Street New Orleans , LA 70113 Hand Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 FAA Southwest Region, ASW-600

Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis
Exhibit 31.4


Certification of Principal Financial Officer


pursuant to


Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),


as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Rex S. Jackson, certify that:





|   |                                                                     
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rocket Fuel Inc.;




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3) | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.




/s/ Rex S. JacksonREX S. JACKSONChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





Date: June 21, 2016
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2079 

To provide that CARES Act Provider Relief Fund payments are not includible 

in gross income, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2021 

Mrs. AXNE (for herself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, and Mr. DUNN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide that CARES Act Provider Relief Fund payments 

are not includible in gross income, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating the Pro5 vider Relief Fund Tax Penalties Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CARES ACT PROVIDER RELIEF FUND PAYMENTS EX7 CLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986, any CARES Act Provider Relief Fund 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2079 IH

1 payment shall not be included in the gross income of the 

2 recipient of such payment. 

3 (b) CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN EX4 PENSES.—For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 

5 1986 and notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 

6 deduction and the basis of any property shall be deter7 mined without regard to whether any amount is excluded 

8 from gross income under subsection (a). 

9 (c) CARES ACT PROVIDER RELIEF FUND PAY10 MENT.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘CARES 

11 Act Provider Relief Fund payment’’ means any grant or 

12 similar assistance provided by the Secretary of Health and 

13 Human Services under the CARES Act Provider Relief 

14 Fund program (including any amounts made available to 

15 carry out such program by the Paycheck Protection Pro16 gram and Health Care Enhancement Act, the Consoli17 dated Appropriations Act, 2021, or any other provision of 

18 law enacted after the date of the enactment of such Acts). 

19 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provisions of this sec20 tion shall apply to taxable years ending after the date of 

21 the enactment of the CARES Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS