alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Progreen Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan Telander, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Jan TelanderJan Telander, President, Chief Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer


September 14, 2011








The foregoing certification is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
AFS-12-024-E November 2, 2011

Exemption No. 10384 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1127

Mr. Charles E. Horning Department Chairman, Aviation Maintenance Science Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 600 South Clyde Morris Blvd. Daytona Beach, FL 32114

Dear Mr. Horning:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 1, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU), for an exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow ERAU to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following successful completion of the general curriculum, prior to meeting the experience requirements of 14 CFR § 65.77.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ERAU.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption Nos. 6569 and 8629 (copies enclosed), the FAA found that testing immediately after learning was a universally accepted instructional principle that reinforces learning. Therefore, we allow the petitioner to test2

students immediately after successfully completing the general curriculum but before meeting the requirements of § 65.77.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption Nos. 6569 and 8629;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption Nos. 6569 and 8629 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University an exemption from 14 CFR § 65.75(a) to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following successful completion of the general curriculum but before meeting the experience requirements of § 65.77, subject to the condition and limitation described

below.

Condition and Limitation

 Before exercising the privileges of this exemption, ERAU must provide its operations handbook to its certificate holding district o ffice (CHDO) and receive approval of the operations handbook from the CHDO.

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
#### James Henry McKISSICK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42732.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 21, 1972.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
The HONORABLE PATRICK A. CONMY, United States District Judge 1

for the District of North Dakota.

___________

No. 95-4066

___________

Brian D. Gale, DM, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of North Dakota.

Podiatry Insurance Company * [UNPUBLISHED]

of America, a foreign mutual, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: September 24, 1996

 Filed: October 2, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Brian D. Gale appeals from the district court's grant of summary 1

judgment in favor of Podiatry Insurance Company of America (PICA). Having

carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the

judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Jerome SIEGEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-848.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1973.

Gaer & Rosengarten, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged by information with breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit grand larceny and assaulting a person therein, and in a second count with assault and battery. Trial was held before a jury. The defendant was found guilty on the first count and acquitted on the second. On this appeal therefrom by the defendant, the several contentions presented for reversal have been considered in the light of the record, briefs and argument and are found to be without merit. The assignment of error relied on for appellant’s contention of insufficiency of the evidence is directed to the verdict, rather than to the judgment. However, the record discloses the verdict and judgment were supported by competent substantial evidence. Error is not shown in relation to the jury charges given by the court. In the circumstances of the case the defendant’s motion for mistrial was properly denied.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.
#### Scottie MACK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-173.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Scottie Mack, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-2559

LT Case No. 2021-CF-001635-A-X

_____________________________

DWRON KENYON ROBINSON,

Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.

Lisa Herndon, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and 

Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and 

Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

August 29, 2023

PER CURIAM

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, JAY, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion 

under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1862 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to carry out 

a pilot program to improve community-based care infrastructure. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mrs. TRAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to carry out a pilot program to improve communitybased care infrastructure. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY4 BASED CARE INFRASTRUCTURE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

6 Human Services may award grants to qualified teaching 

7 health centers (as defined in section 340H of the Public 

8 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256h)) and behavioral 

9 health care centers (as defined by the Secretary, to include 

10 both substance abuse and mental health care facilities) to 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1862 IH

1 support the improvement, renovation, or modernization of 

2 infrastructure at such centers, including to address 

3 COVID–19 and other subsequent public health crises. 

4 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry 

5 out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated 

6 $500,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2022 through 

7 2026. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30770]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice was previously published at 62 FR 61153 on November 14, 
1997, that the Railroad Retirement Board would hold a meeting on 
November 19, 1997, 9:00 a.m., at the Board's meeting room on the 8th 
floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 
Illinois, 60611. This meeting has been canceled.

    Date: November 18, 1997.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-30770 Filed 11-19-97; 10:52 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
|                   | Computer Sciences Corporation |                        |
|------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                   |                          |                        |   |
| Date: February 8, 2012 | By:                           | /s/ Michael W. Laphen  |   |
|                   |                          | Michael W. Laphen           |   |
|                   |                          | Chief Executive Officer     |   |
|                   |                          |                        |   |

----
#### SEBRING PACKING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 44362.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 9, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 281 So.2d 252.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Roger S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


November 14, 2005

/s/ Roger S. Marcus
----------------------
Roger S. Marcus
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1395

PAM MANEY; WANDA B. BRADLEY; JUDY WILLIAMSON;

JANET P. FRYE; WILLIAM JONES; WALLACE C.

LEATHERWOOD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

BUNCOMBE COUNTY/WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA FAIR

ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED; CURTIS HAWKINS,

Plaintiffs,

versus

JAMES GRAHAM, Individually and in his capacity

as North Carolina Commissioner of Agriculture;

WILLIAM EDMONSSON, Individually and in his

capacity as Director of the Western North

Carolina Agriculture Center; CLAYTON DAVIS;

WELDON DENNY; WAYNE MILLER; DAVID MCLEOD;

CRAIG GLOVER; WAYNE WALKER; STEVE MOBLEY,

Individually and in their capacities as

employees of the North Carolina Department of

Agriculture; MORRIS MCGOUGH, a/k/a Mac,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, Individually and in his

capacity as Secretary of State of North

Carolina; BETTY Y. JUSTUS, Individually and in

her capacity as Secretary of the North

Carolina Department of Revenue,

Defendants.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CA-94-167-1)

Submitted: February 25, 1997 Decided: March 25, 1997

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pam Maney, Wanda B. Bradley, Judy Williamson, Janet P. Frye,

William Jones, Wallace C. Leatherwood, Appellants Pro Se. Lars

Franklin Nance, Thomas Giles Meacham, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss their claims for monetary

relief, as well as their supplemental state law claims and various

motions, but rejecting the magistrate judge's recommendation to

dismiss Appellants' claims for injunctive relief against the Appellees in their official capacities. We dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither

a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02784**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 02784\02784_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02784\02784_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 02784\02784_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02784\02784_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02784\02784_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02784\02784_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02784\02784_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02784\02784_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02784\Certification Statement_02784.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 02784\Supporting Documentation\02784_Final EPA Copy-Bay Shore-Part A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02784\Supporting Documentation\02784_Final EPA Copy-Bay Shore-Part A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02784\Supporting Documentation\02784_Final EPA Copy-Bay Shore-Part D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

.
Exhibit 13

AIPT 325

Exhibit 13

AIPT 326
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31350]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Epidemiology Program Office, Office of the Director, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Announces the Following Meeting

    Name: Guide to Community Preventive Services (GCPS) Task Force 
Meeting.
    Times and Dates: 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m., December 15, 1997; 8 a.m.-4 
p.m., December 16, 1997.
    Place: Westin Peachtree Plaza, 210 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30326.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: The mission of the Task Force is to develop and publish a 
Guide to Community Preventive Services, based on the best available 
scientific evidence and current expertise regarding essential public 
health services and what works in the delivery of those services.
    Matters To Be Considered: Agenda items include (1) presentations 
and review of evidence tables and draft recommendations of 
interventions for the Vaccine Preventable Diseases and Motor Vehicle 
Occupant Injuries Chapters; (2) a discussion on the development of an 
explicit process to incorporate cost effectiveness into the development 
of the Guide; (3) a discussion on the role of the expert opinion in the 
development of the Guide; (4) organization of draft stand-alone topics 
and/or chapters; (5) a review of the plans to field test, and ``roll 
out'' sections of the Guide; and (6) a report from the Table of 
Contents Work Group regarding proposed introductory material ``Front 
Matter'' in the Guide.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for Additional Information: Marguerite Pappaioanou, 
Chief, Community Preventive Service Guide Development Activity, 
Division of Prevention Research and Analytic Methods, Epidemiology 
Program Office, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, M/S D-01, Atlanta, Georgia 
30333, telephone 404/639-4301. Persons wishing to reserve a space for 
this meeting should call 404/639-4301 by close of business on December 
10, 1997.

    Dated: November 24, 1997.
John C. Burckhardt,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-31350 Filed 11-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Order entered December 12 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00641
- CR
STEVEN JOSEPH EISELE , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Co unty Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 003
- 83436
- 2015



### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s December 7, 2016 third motion to extend time to file his brief
and ORDER the brief filed no later than December 22, 2016. If appellant’s brief i s not filed by December 22, 2016, this appeal will be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8(b). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b).
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1




















CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual Report of Global Smoothie Supply, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David C. Tiller, Chief Executive Officer and Donald M. Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





By:
/s/ David C. TillerName:
David C. TillerTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/Donald M. RobertsName:
Donald M. RobertsTitle:
Chief Financial Officer














This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.