alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

May 15, 2023

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy
Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Speaker:

I am writing to follow up on my previous letters regarding the debt limit and to provide
additional information regarding the Treasury Department’s ability to continue to finance the
operations of the federal government.

In my May 1 letter, I noted that our best estimate was that Treasury would be unable to continue
to satisfy all of the government’s obligations by early June if Congress does not raise or suspend
the debt limit before that time. In that letter, I also noted that while it is impossible to predict
with certainty the exact date when Treasury will be unable to pay all the government’s bills, I
would continue to update Congress as more information becomes available. With additional
information now available, I am writing to note that we still estimate that Treasury will likely no
longer be able to satisfy all of the government’s obligations if Congress has not acted to raise or
suspend the debt limit by early June, and potentially as early as June 1.

These estimates are based on currently available data, and federal receipts, outlays, and debt
could vary from these estimates. The actual date Treasury exhausts extraordinary measures could
be a number of days or weeks later than these estimates. I will provide an additional update to
Congress next week as more information becomes available.

We have learned from past debt limit impasses that waiting until the last minute to suspend or
increase the debt limit can cause serious harm to business and consumer confidence, raise short-
term borrowing costs for taxpayers, and negatively impact the credit rating of the United States.
In fact, we have already seen Treasury’s borrowing costs increase substantially for securities
maturing in early June. If Congress fails to increase the debt limit, it would cause severe hardship
to American families, harm our global leadership position, and raise questions about our ability
to defend our national security interests.


I continue to urge Congress to protect the full faith and credit of the United States by acting as

soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Janet L. Yellen

Identical letter sent to:
The Honorable Hakeem Jeffries, House Democratic Leader
The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Majority Leader
The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican Leader

cc: The Honorable Jason Smith, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Richard E. Neal, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Ron Wyden, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance
The Honorable Mike Crapo, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
| 1.   | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 10, 2011 | By:    | /s/  | Michael W. Laphen               |
|------------------------|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------|
|                   |   |      | Michael W. Laphen                    |
|                   |   |      | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |   |      |                                 |

----
March 26, 2015

1 Amendment for Exemption No. 11238 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0719

Registered Owner Name: San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Registered Owner Address:

8316 Century Park Court

San Diego CA 921 23
Attn: Dallas Cormier, CP52E

Aircraft Description:

Vertical Take O ff and Landing (VTOL)

s UAS

Aircraft Registration /Serial Number :

N55TD/ 0030200300632

N619FS/ 0030200300633
N619TD/ 0030200300634

N858JE/ 0030200300635

N858DC/ 0030200300636

N619CV/ 0030200300637
N554GE/ 0030200300638

N553GE/ 0030200300639 Aircraft Builder: Physical Sciences Inc.

Year Manufactured:

2014

Aircraft Model Designation: InstantEye Mk

- 2 Gen 3

Engine Model:

Mk

- 2 Gen Brushless Motor

Propeller Model:

PSI 7 x 5 Pusher

San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) received Exemption No. 11238 on March 26, 2015 for the InstantEye Mk

- 2 Gen2.

SDG&E is requesting to amended that exemption to include the InstantEye Mk

- 2 Gen3. Because it took over 6 months for our exemption request to get approved , th e InstantEye Mk

- 2 Gen2 is

now obsolete.

The InstantEye Gen 3 is the same Unmanned Aircraft as the Gen 2 but it’s bigger in si ze and capabilities. The InstantEye is a vertical take off and landing (VTOL) quadrotor small unmanned aerial system (sUAS). The aircraft is in a “X” configuration with 4 rotors centered at the tips of its carbon fiber arms separated by 22.23 cm on a side for the Gen 3 vs. 20 cm on the Mk

- 2. The

aircraft is all

- electric with a brushless motor driving each rotor. There is a 4 Amp/Hour Lithium polyme r rechargeable /replaceable battery at the bottom of the center of the aircraft on the Gen 3 vs. a 2 Amp/hour on the Gen 2. Maximum gross takeoff weight for the Gen 3 is 725g and the Gen 2 is 610g. Maximum endurance for the Gen 3 is 30 minutes and 20minute s for the Gen 3.
#### Roosevelt GLENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-692.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Judge C. Luckey, Jr., Public Defender, and Ralph Steinberg, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery in the Criminal Court of Record in and for Hillsborough County. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal to this court, 256 So.2d 421. He now appeals from the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 3.850, 33 F.S.A. The grounds argued as the basis of this appeal are the failure of the trial judge to instruct the jury on lesser included offenses and that the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence.

The facts of the case place it very near the fine line distinguishing larceny and robbery, Colby v. State, 1903, 46 Fla. 112, 35 So. 189, and while appellant’s later ground might have presented a close question on a direct appeal, it is not now available. The legal sufficiency of the evidence to convict cannot be raised on post-conviction motion. Ramos v. State, Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 728. Similarly, the failure to give an instruction is a matter which may be urged only on direct appeal and not in support of a motion for *24post-conviction relief. Lawson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 790.

Accordingly, the order of the trial judge denying relief pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 3.850 is affirmed.

HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3133]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-012)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.
    Copies of patent applications cited are available from the Office 
of Patent Counsel, Johnson Space Center. Claims are deleted from the 
patent applications to avoid premature disclosure.

DATES: February 10, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ed Fein, Patent Counsel, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Mail Code HA, 
Houston, TX 77058; telephone (281) 483-0837.

NASA Case No. MSC-22325: Misalignment Accommodating Connector Assembly;
NASA Case No. MSC-22797-1: Actuator for Flexing a Resilient Covering;

    Dated: January 30, 1997.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-3133 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

MUHAMMED ZBEIDA TILLISY,

Appellant.

No. 73533-1-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: JUN 1 3 2016

Per Curiam — Muhammed Tillisy appeals from the amended judgment and

sentence entered following this court's remand in State v. Tillisv. noted at 183 Wn. App.

1029 (2014). Tillisy contends - and the State concedes - that the trial court erred in

failing to remove all references in the judgment and sentence to the vacated conviction

on Count II. We accept the State's concession. Accordingly, we remand with directions

to delete all references in the judgment and sentence to the vacated conviction.

Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

For the court:

f

'-^c ^

CO

zx.

GO r-;

—I—i m

Z21 *—

o-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                Appendix A to Item 601(c) of Regulation S-K
                    Commercial and Industrial Companies
                       Article 5 of Regulation S-X
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,431,235
<SECURITIES>                                   221,735
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,895,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,783,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,116,449
<PP&E>                                     162,167,893
<DEPRECIATION>                              84,917,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             122,607,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,371,055
<BONDS>                                      5,204,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                  1,692,641
<COMMON>                                    27,659,855
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,674,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               122,607,187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,317,763
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,370,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               241,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             256,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,449,479
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,724,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,725,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,725,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.77
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q ofComputer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30,2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, William J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant toRule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

 

1. the Periodic Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  | August 8, 2005 | /s/  William J. Murphy |   |
|--------|----------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   |           | WILLIAM J. MURPHY           |
|   |           | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.

 

1

----
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Adminis1ratlon 

NOV 2 4 2014 

Jeffrey M. Gallant, Esq. 

Clark Hill PLC 

500 Woodward Avenue 

Suite 3500 

Detroit, MI 48226 

Dear Mr.. Gallant: 

Office of Airport Compliance 

S\N. 

and Management Analysis 

800 Independence Ave., 

WashingtOn, DC 20591 

Re: Ultimate Concrete. LLC v. Citv ofEI Paso. FM Docket No. 16-14-10 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FM) has r~eived the above-captioned complaint, 

filed by you on behalf of Ultimate Concrete, LLC, against the respondent City ofEl Paso. 

The complaint alleges that El Paso failed to establish and conduct competitive bidding in 

accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation and F M regulations. Specificaily, 

Ultimate Concrete states that El Paso failed to award the contract for construction to the 

lowest responsive bidder pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 18.36(d) and that the City violated its 

protest procedures providing the necessary grounds for substantive review by the F M under 

§18.36(b)(l2). 

This is to advise that since the complaint alleges violations of Part 18, Uniform 

administrative requirements for grants and cooperative agreements to State and local 

governments, we must forward your complaint to the FAA's Office of Airports, Airports 

Financial Assistance Division (APP-500), 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 

D.C. 20591. That office reviews appeals under 49 C.F.R. Part I 8. Your "complaint" will 

be reviewed to determine whether there is a basis for an appeal pursuant to 49 C.F.R. 

§ 18.36(b )(12). 

The Part I 6 Complaint docketed under 16-14-10 is hereby closed. 

Should you have any questions on this matter please contact Nicole Starman or Jonathan 

Cross in the Office of the Chief Counsel (202-267-3473), or Kevin Willis ofmy staff at 

(202) 267-8741. . ''· . 

Sincerely, 

Randall S. Fiertz 

Director of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
cc: Mr. Tommy Gonzalez 

City Manager, El Paso 

300 North Campbell Street 

El Paso, TX 79901 

Part 16 Proceedings Docket 

2 

·,_.'
**Exhibit 99.5**

 

**CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**

 

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Cenovus Energy Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2015, relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Cenovus Energy Inc., which comprise the Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income, Shareholders’ Equity and Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 and the related notes and to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Cenovus Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2014, which appears in this Annual Report.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-163397), Form F-3D (File No. 333-166419), and Form F-10 (File No. 333-196696) of Cenovus Energy Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2015 referred to above. We also consent to reference to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP under the heading “Interests of Experts,” which appears in the Annual Information Form included in this Annual Report on Form 40-F, which is incorporated by reference in such Registration Statements.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Calgary, Alberta

February 13, 2015

 

----
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   February 19, 2013 |   | By: /s/ Craig S. McMillan    |
|------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Craig S. McMillan            |
|                                     |   | Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                     |   | Principal Executive Officer  |
|                                     |   | Director                     |
|                                     |   |                         |
|                                     |   |                         |
|                                     |   |                         |
| Date:   February 19, 2013 |   | By: /s/ Steve W. Roussin     |
|                                     |   | Steve W. Roussin             |
|                                     |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
|                                     |   | Principal Financial Officer  |
|                                     |   | Principal Accounting Officer |
|                                     |   | President                    |
|                                     |   | Director                     |

----
Exhibit 12.2


INTELLIPHARMACEUTICS INTERNATIONAL INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,   Shameze Rampertab, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Intellipharmaceutics International Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: April 14, 2014





By:
/s/ Shameze RampertabShameze Rampertab

Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, William Salek, Chief Financial Officer of Colonial Commercial Corp., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial
Corp. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 15, 2004                   /s/ William Salek
                                          -----------------
                                          William Salek
                                          Chief Financial Officer
#### CITY OF LAKE CHARLES v. Daniel W. CRADEUR.

No. 61967.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Daniel W. Cradeur, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and a stay order. Parish of Calcasieu.

Denied.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Barbara Zazulak

No. 06

- 23

- 00048

- CV Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Rambin

, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice

van Cleef participating.

As sta te d in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED JUNE 26, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey , Clerk