alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.9  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the reference to our Firm under the captions Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm and Principal Accountant Fees and Services and to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of our reports dated March 31, 2014, with respect to the statements of financial position of the Trust as at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sprott Physical Gold Trust as at December 31, 2013.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated March 31, 2014 in the Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-184183).  /s/ Ernst & Young LLPToronto, Canada
Chartered AccountantsMarch 31, 2014
Licensed Public Accountants
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**ofRegulation AB**

I, Victor A. De Jesus, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofWorld Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement 2009-A to the Closed-End ServicingAgreement, dated as of November 12, 2009 (the “Exchange Note Servicing Supplement”), among World Omni Automobile Lease Securitization Trust 2009-A, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Leasing LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, asfollows: 

(i)        A review of the activities of the Servicer during theperiod covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement, has been made under mysupervision. 

(ii)        To the best of my knowledge, based on the reviewdescribed above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as of March 18, 2010.
**Exhibit 32.2.1**

 

**Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.(the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: May 10, 2007
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Transition Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), 4(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.








Date:  March  29, 2017





Entergy Texas, Inc., as servicer





By:  /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:   Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Dear Dr. Barone- 

 

My colleagues and I at the Occupational Health Branch of the CA Dept of Public Health (DCPH) have been

investigating the continued occurrence of serious poisonings – including fatalties – attributable to the use of 

methylene chloride in paint strippers. Nationwide, despite the existence of a FedOSHA standard, at least 13 

fatalities have been documented among bathtub refinishers in the last decade: 

 

 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6107a2.htm

 

In addition, CDPH has investigated two California occupational fatalities occurring in the last two years: 

 

 http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/ohb-face/Documents/MeClChurch.pdf

 http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/ohb-face/Documents/paintstripper.pdf

 

My colleague, Dr. Robert Harrison, can provide further details on these – and other – incidents. Of note, both 

recent California fatalities have involved consumer-available paint stripper formulations. 

 

Because of its high volatility and in vivo conversion to carbon monoxide, methylene chloride poses an 

extraordinary acute health risk to its users. In this context, we were curious what risk mitigation options the EPA 

might eventually consider under its work plan for this chemical? This question is particularly salient given the 

EU’s recent decision to ban the use of methylene chloride in paint strippers other than in fixed industrial 

operations with high-efficiency exhaust ventilation. 

Methylene Chloride Work Plan 

Shusterman, Dennis (CDPH-DEODC) 

10/01/2012 01:15 PM 

To: 

Stan Barone 

Cc: 

"Harrison, Robert (CDPH-OHB)" 

Hide Details 

From: "Shusterman, Dennis (CDPH-DEODC)" <Dennis.Shusterman@cdph.ca.gov>

To: Stan Barone/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "Harrison, Robert (CDPH-OHB)" <Robert.Harrison@cdph.ca.gov> 

History: This message has been replied to. 

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\sbarone\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1959.h... 10/11/2012
Any information you can provide would be greatly appreciated. 

 

Best regards- 

 

Dennis Shusterman, MD, MPH 

California Dept. of Public Health 

Occupational Health Branch / HESIS 

850 Marina Bay Parkway 

Building P, 3rd Floor 

Richmond, CA 94804 

510-620-5714 tel 

510-620-5743 fax

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\sbarone\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web1959.h... 10/11/2012
#### FOOD FAIR PROPERTIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Leonora SNELLGROVE and John Snellgrove, Appellees.

No. 73-94.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 26, 1974.

Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Nie-moeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellants.

Horton & Perse and Arnold Ginsberg, Welsh & Carroll, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by one of the defendants from a final judgment for the plaintiffs. The judgment was entered pursuant to a jury verdict which exonerated the other defendants and held the appellant liable for plaintiffs’ injuries. Appellant has presented six points on appeal, each of which has been examined and found not to present reversible error except as to the point directed to the taxation of costs.

We think that it is unnecessary to examine each of appellant’s points which would require discussion of trial procedure, the rules of evidence, instructions to the jury, and the offer of post-trial motions. Appellant’s basic position is that the evidence before the trial court was insufficient to establish a theory of liability for plaintiffs’ injuries. We find from our review of the record that liability appears under the facts of this case under the law expressed in Leveridge v. Lapidus, Fla.App. 1958, 105 So.2d 207.

Appellant’s point directed to the assessment of the entire costs of the proceeding against it as the single defendant found liable is well-taken. See Van Devahder v. Knesnik, Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 57.

The judgment is affirmed except as to the assessment of costs in the trial court, and the cause is remanded with directions for the assessment of costs in accordance with the views expressed in Van Devander v. Knesnik, supra.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
EXHIBIT 33.1










REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES






Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:




(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Transition Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), 4(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);




(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;




(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2011, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and




(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2011, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.






Date:  March 29, 2012






Entergy Texas, Inc., as servicer




By: /s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Name:  Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.


Title:    Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Thomas A. Franza,
Chief Executive Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 20, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas A. Franza   
|                         |  |  |  | Thomas A. Franza       
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Eastern World Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Bradley Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 14th day of February, 2011.








BRADLEY MILLERBradley MillerChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Treasury approves Kansas’ plan to invest $14.7 million of CPF funding in 

Digital Connectivity Technology projects that aim to address gaps in digital 

equity, affordability, and broadband adoption.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Kansas

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $14.7 million for Digital Connectivity Technology (10% of CPF allocation)

 Individuals to Be Served: 12,579 (estimated)

 Program Description: The Kansas Digital Technology Connectivity (DTC) program is a 

competitive grant program that aims to address gaps in digital equity, affordability, and 

broadband adoption by investing in public Wi-Fi infrastructure, digital devices, and digital 

literacy training resources. The DTC program will improve broadband access and affordability 

by targeting public Wi-Fi investments, including access points, repeaters, and routers, to 

economically distressed communities with low rates of broadband access and adoption. The 

program will also provide laptops, tablets, and other Wi-Fi-enabled devices to lower 

affordability barriers and increase adoption. Kansas will rely on several studies that have 

analyzed the lack of affordable broadband options in many areas of the state to identify 

communities with critical needs.

 Key State Contact: The Kansas Office of Broadband Development (KOBD)

Kansas Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of My Catalogs Online, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ronald Teblum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Ronald TeblumRonald Teblum
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)   Dated: December 23, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Statements of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 ($ in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Twelve Months                           Twelve Months
                                                    Ended June 30,                        Ended December 31,
                                                   ----------------      ---------------------------------------------------
                                                   2004       2003       2003       2002        2001       2000        1999
                                                   ----------------      ---------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES:                    677.0      734.6      727.8      662.3       453.7      455.9       529.6

ADJUSTMENTS:
  Distributed (Undistributed) equity income            -          -        0.1       (2.5)        2.2       (5.5)       (5.8)
  Fixed charges *                                   90.7      109.5       91.6      124.4       165.9      190.5       181.7
                                                   -----      -----      -----      -----       -----      -----       -----
Earnings available                                 767.7      844.1      819.5      784.2       621.8      640.9       705.5

*FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest on long-term and short-term debt         84.9      103.5       85.8      117.9       161.4      172.0       167.5
  Portion of rentals representing interest           5.8        6.0        5.8        6.5         4.5       18.5        14.2
                                                   -----      -----      -----      -----       -----      -----       -----
Total Fixed Charges                                 90.7      109.5       91.6      124.4       165.9      190.5       181.7

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                  8.46       7.71       8.95       6.30        3.75       3.36        3.88
                                                   =====      =====      =====      =====       =====      =====       =====
</TABLE>

Prior periods have been restated to reflect discontinued operations.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC, Sponsor of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Nicholas D. GerberName:

Title:
Nicholas D. Gerber

President and Chief Executive Officer

United States Commodity Funds LLC,

Sponsor of United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
##### 



Exhibit 11 CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Earnings Per Share
(in thousands, except per share data) Three months ended
    
    
    Nine months endedSeptember 30,
    
    
    September 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003(Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)
    
    
    (Restated)Computation of share totals used in
computing earnings per share:Basic weighted average number of
shares outstanding
    
    
    18,877
    
    
    
    18,765
    
    
    
    18,862
    
    
    
    18,740Incremental shares arising from
outstanding stock options
    
    
    177
    
    
    
    88
    
    
    
    148
    
    
    
    51Total weighted average number of
diluted shares outstanding
    
    
    19,054
    
    
    
    18,853
    
    
    
    19,010
    
    
    
    18,791Income from continuing operations
    
    $
    2,244
    
    
    $
    3,514
    
    
    $
    10,649
    
    
    $
    17,342Loss from discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (424
    )Net income
    
    $
    2,244
    
    
    $
    3,514
    
    
    $
    10,649
    
    
    $
    16,918Net income for common stock
    
    $
    2,239
    
    
    $
    3,509
    
    
    $
    10,634
    
    
    $
    16,903Basic earnings (loss) per share:Continuing operations
    
    $
    0.12
    
    
    $
    0.19
    
    
    $
    0.56
    
    
    $
    0.92Discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (0.02
    )Net income for common stock
    
    
    0.12
    
    
    
    0.19
    
    
    
    0.56
    
    
    
    0.90Diluted earnings (loss) per share:Continuing operations
    
    $
    0.12
    
    
    $
    0.19
    
    
    $
    0.56
    
    
    $
    0.92Discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (0.02
    )Net income for common stock
    
    
    0.12
    
    
    
    0.19
    
    
    
    0.56
    
    
    
    0.90
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00263- CV

Robert o Juarez Salinas, App ellant

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 201 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 08- 0022 53, H ONO RAB LE SUZANNE COVI NGTON, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O PI N I O N
Roberto J uare z Salinas appea ls a decr ee terminating his pare ntal rights. The decr ee was signed on October 30, 2009, and the notice of appea l was due November 19, 2 0 0 9. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b) (notice of appea l in acc eler ated appea l must be filed within 20 day s o f d at e of judgme nt). Salinas did not file his notice of appea l until April 8, 2011. Whil e Salinas reque sts leave to file an out-of

-time appe al, this Court does not have the authority to alter the time for

perf ecting
an appea l in a civil case . See Tex. R. App. P. 2; see also Tex. Fa m. Code Ann. § 161.211(a) (West 2008) (orde r terminating pare ntal rights is immune from direc t or collater al attack afte r six th month af t er d at e order was signe d). Be cause the notice of appea l was not timely filed, this Court l ac k s jurisdiction over the a

ppeal. We dismiss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction.___________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Henson a nd Goodwin Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: June 17, 2011

2