alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 1997 / Notices 64047

Approved: November 25, 1997.

Garrick R. Shear,

IRS Reports Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–31593 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS

Advisory Committee on Minority

Veterans, Notice of Meeting

Cancellation

The Department of Veterans Affairs

notice that a meeting of the Advisory

Committee on Minority Veterans to be

held on December 8, 1997, through

December 10, 1997, in Washington, DC,

is hereby canceled. The notice appeared

in the Federal Register on November 13,

1997, on page 60938.

If you have any questions, please

contact Mr. Anthony Hawkins,

Department of Veterans Affairs, at (202)

273–6708.

Dated: November 25, 1997.

By direction of the Acting Secretary.

Heyward Bannister,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–31626 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

    WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of CT Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge on the date hereof:

         (a)      the Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended June 30,
                  2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                     /s/ Michael R. Coltrane
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Michael R. Coltrane
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     August 14, 2002



                                     /s/ James E. Hausman
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     James E. Hausman
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     August 14, 2002
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Rostowsky, Principal Financial Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

Date: March 30, 2015

 
|   | /s/   Steven Rostowsky        |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Steven   Rostowsky            |
|   | Principal   Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Mitchell Lee SIMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 20 23- 2288 LT Case No. 2022
- CF
- 001811

_____________________________ T YTRELL D EVAUGHN B ROWN , Appella nt, v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. R. Lee S mith , Judge . Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. April 12, 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J., W ALLIS , and L AMBERT , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
~ ... "'' ' 

I. 

THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 

June 19, 2012 

The Honorable Kay Bailey Hutchison 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Hutchison: 

'Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by the Abilene Regional Airport for 

a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air Service 

Development Program. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 gr_ant 

awards each year, although no more than 4 awards may be to communities in the same State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deficiencies, the statute provides flex!bility, in the types of projects that can be funded. ' ...... 

!.1 

On May 15, the Department issued an order requesting tha~ communities interested in receiving a 

grant this year file their applications by June 11. As these grant requests are pending before the 

Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any particular proposal. I assure you that the 

Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our normal practice, I 

DOT -OST -2012-0069 as 

this pJ."ogram. 

a copy of your letter and this resp 

de the record of this matter. I a 
KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON COMMIH!'ES: 

TEXAS APP!l(lPRI!ITIONS 

ilnitcd ;otatcs ;ornate 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510-4304 

May 29,2012 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

RUt.ES J\ND ADM!N\~)TRATJDt~ 

The Abilene Regional Airport has notified me that it has submitted an application 

to be considered for funding under the Small Community Air Service Development Grant 

Program. I am pleased to support the application. 

lam requesting the U.S. Department of Transportation to consider the merits of 

the proposal and ensure it receives a fair and thorough review during the evaluation 

process. I have been inf01med that this grant would benefit the community by expanding 

choice and convenience for airline travelers and contributing to regional economic 

develepment. 

Should you have any questions regarding the application, I hope you will not 

hesitate to contact Lucas Szabo in my office for additienal information. 

Sincerely, 

KBH/ls 

S10-120604-D10 Wob~http://hU!chison.senato.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1861 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1861

  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow 
schools that participate in the school lunch program under such Act to 
                           serve whole milk.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

 Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Delgado) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                               and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow 
schools that participate in the school lunch program under such Act to 
                           serve whole milk.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. WHOLE MILK PERMISSIBLE.

    Section 9(a)(2)(A) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) In general.--Lunches served by schools 
                participating in the school lunch program under this 
                chapter--
                            ``(i) shall offer students a variety of 
                        fluid milk;
                            ``(ii) may offer students flavored and 
                        unflavored whole, reduced-fat, low-fat and fat-
                        free fluid milk and lactose-free fluid milk; 
                        and
                            ``(iii) shall provide a substitute for 
                        fluid milk for students whose disability 
                        restricts their diet, on receipt of a written 
                        statement from a licensed physician that 
                        identifies the disability that restricts the 
                        student's diet and that specifies the 
                        substitute for fluid milk.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 8: Page 1 of 2

WESTERN STATES OFFICE AND 

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND

THIRD SUSPENSION APPLICATION

Exhibit 8
Western States Office and Professional Employees Pension Fund

Exhibit 8: Page 2 of 2

Exhibit 8

Rev. Proc. 2017-43, Section 6.04

Ten-Year Experience

For Certain Critical Assumptions

Contributions

Year

Ending

12/31

Base 

Contributions

Supplemental 

and Surcharge 

Contributions

Withdrawal 

Liability 

Payments

Base 

Units(Hours)

Base Average 

Hourly Rate

Supplemental and 

Surcharge Average 

Hourly Rate

Return on Assets

(Market Basis)

2008 $8,277,807 N/A N/A 4,203,802 $1.97 N/A (32.15)%

2009 $7,842,903 $161,882 N/A 4,063,879 $1.93 $0.04 15.95%

2010 $7,676,687 $812,322 N/A 3,671,591 $2.09 $0.22 13.23%

2011 $7,297,989 $1,318,385 $6,012 3,555,598 $2.05 $0.37 1.50%

2012 $6,980,563 $1,879,073 $937,412 3,358,483 $2.08 $0.56 11.53%

2013 $6,485,023 $2,884,983 $1,674,335 3,231,057 $2.01 $0.89 12.97%

2014 $5,064,945 $3,776,471 $1,570,022 1,776,431 $2.85 $2.13 4.47%

2015 $4,883,040 $3,591,720 $3,337,192 1,575,730 $3.10 $2.28 0.63%

2016 $4,318,217 $3,060,448 $3,872,245 1,358,925 $3.18 $2.25 6.44%

2017 $3,457,158 $2,769,935 $3,489,232 1,034,653 $3.34 $2.68 13.29%
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,465

EX PARTE JONATHAN SHANE ROSS PEAKE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 01-08-05233-CR IN THE 359TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Peake v. State, No. 07-03-00216-CR (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2004, no pet.). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because, among

other things, he failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to

advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit
2

with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and

conclusions of law that appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance. The trial court recommends

that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore,

that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review

of the judgment of the Seventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 07-03-00216-CR that affirmed his

conviction in Case No. 01-08-05233-CR from the 359th Judicial District Court of Montgomery

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Seventh Court of Appeals

within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: December 8, 2010

Do not publish
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEROME ERIC BIVENS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2643

[ February 22, 2024 ]

Appeal of order d enying rule 3.8 00 and 3.8 50 motion from the Circuit

Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S

. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13

- 10590CF10A.

Jerome Eric Bivens, Doral, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, D AMOORGIAN and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

March 22, 2010

Invesco Mortgage Recovery Master Associates LLC

Two Peachtree Pointe

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E.

Suite 1800

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

UST Reallocation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to (i) the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Invesco

Legacy Securities Master Fund, L.P., (the “Partnership”) dated as of September 30, 2009 (as the same

may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Partnership Agreement”) and (ii) the

Loan Agreement, dated as of the date set forth on Schedule A thereto, by and among the Partnership, as

Borrower, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and The United

States Department of the Treasury, as Lender (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented

from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the

meanings set forth in the Partnership Agreement or the Loan Agreement, as applicable.

The aggregate capital commitments of UST to the UST/TCW Senior Mortgage Securities Fund,

L.P. (the “TCW Fund”) was $1,111,111,111.00, of which $44,500,000.00 has been re-invested in other

PPIFs. Accordingly, $1,066,611,111.00 remains available for reallocation, which equates to

$133,326,388.87 per each of the other eight PPIFs.

Pursuant to Section 3.1(g) of the Partnership Agreement, UST hereby consents and the General

Partner agrees to a UST Reallocation in the amount of $133,326,388.87 to the Partnership. The revised

maximum Capital Commitment of UST (the “Maximum UST Capital Commitment”) and Maximum UST

Debt Amount (upon application of the definition of the “Maximum UST Debt Amount” in the Loan

Agreement) are set forth on Exhibit I hereto. Such allocation shall be deemed effective upon the date

hereof.
For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in the

Partnership Agreement, the Capital Commitment of UST shall at all times equal the aggregate Capital

Commitments of the Limited Partners other than UST.

* * * *


EXHIBIT I

UST REALLOCATION

Prior Capital

Commitment of UST UST Reallocation

Maximum UST

Capital Commitment

Maximum UST Debt

Amount

$1,111,111,111.00 133,326,388.87 $1,244,437,499.87 $2,488,874,999.74
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1938 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1938

  To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure that a member of a 
 reserve component of a uniformed service, who performs active service 
  for more than 30 consecutive days under multiple calls or orders to 
  active service that specify periods of 30 days or less, is paid the 
 same basic allowance for housing as a similarly situated member of a 
 reserve component called or ordered to active service for a period of 
                           more than 30 days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2021

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure that a member of a 
 reserve component of a uniformed service, who performs active service 
  for more than 30 consecutive days under multiple calls or orders to 
  active service that specify periods of 30 days or less, is paid the 
 same basic allowance for housing as a similarly situated member of a 
 reserve component called or ordered to active service for a period of 
                           more than 30 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard Housing Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. PARITY IN BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING FOR MEMBERS OF THE 
              RESERVE COMPONENTS WHO SERVE FOR MORE THAN 30 CONSECUTIVE 
              DAYS UNDER MULTIPLE CALLS OR ORDERS TO ACTIVE SERVICE.

    Section 403(g)(5) of title 37, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' before ``The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), a member of a reserve 
component, who performs active service for more than 30 consecutive 
days under multiple calls or orders to active service that specify 
periods of 30 days or less, shall be paid the same basic allowance for 
housing as a similarly situated member of a reserve component who is 
called or ordered to active service for a period of more than 30 
days.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Eligah JOINER v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 39188.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
**Exhibit 23.1**

GEORGE STEWART, CPA

316 17TH AVENUE SOUTH

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144

(206) 328-8554   FAX: (206) 328-0383

To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of George Stewart, Certified Public Accountant consents to the inclusion of the report on the Financial Statements of Audience Productions, Inc. as of September 30, 2010 and 2009, in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very Truly Yours,

/S/ GEORGE STEWART

George Stewart, CPA

December 28, 2010
#### Woodrow WILSON, Appellant, v. J. W. STROUD, Appellee.

No. L-404.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 28, 1970.

James C. Handly, Jr., Jacksonville, S. Perry Penland, Jacksonville, for appellant.

. Boyd, Jenerette & Leemis, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellee in a suit for personal injuries suffered by appellant while he was gratuitously mowing the grass of his father-in-law, appellee herein.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact and that appellee was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. Pass v. Friedman, 140 So.2d 883 (Fla.App.1962).

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
CORONAVIRUS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Allocations for Territories and Freely Associated States 

August 2021

Territory / Freely Associated State Allocation

U.S. Virgin Islands $14,285,714.28

Guam $14,285,714.29

American Samoa $14,285,714.28

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands $14,285,714.29

Republic of the Marshall Islands $14,285,714.28

Federated States of Micronesia $14,285,714.29

Republic of Palau $14,285,714.29
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7991** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. PAUL PHOTIADIS BOCCONE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00592

- CMH

- 1; 1:15

- cv - 00887

- CMH )

Submitted : May 26 , 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Paul Photiadis Boccone, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory P. Bailey, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Ruxandra Barbulescu, Jonathan Persons Robell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Michael Phillip Ben’Ary, Assistant United States Attorney, Marc Birnbaum, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paul Photiadis Boccone seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealabilit y will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural ground s, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and con clude that
Boccone has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th i s court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED