alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,477; TA-W-33,477B]


Cone Mills Corporation; Haynes Plant, Henrietta, North Carolina 
and Cliffside Plant, Cliffside, North Carolina; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on June 
17, 1997, applicable to workers of Cone Mills Corporation, Haynes 
Florence Plant located in Henrietta, North Carolina. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38579). The 
worker certification was subsequently amended to correctly identify the 
plant to read Haynes Plant instead of Haynes Florence Plant and to 
include workers of the Florence Plant in Forest City, North Carolina 
(TA-W-33,477A). The notice of amended certification was published in 
the Federal Register on July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38584).
    At the request of petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
denim. Findings on review show that workers separations have occurred 
at the subject firm's Cliffside Plant, in Cliffside, North Carolina.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Cone Mills Corporation who were affected by increased 
imports. Accordingly, the Department is amending the worker 
certification to include the workers of the Cliffside Plant of Cone 
Mills Corporation, Cliffside, North Carolina.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,477 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Cone Mills Corporation, Haynes Plant, 
Henrietta, North Carolina (TA-W-33,477) and Cliffside Plant, 
Cliffside, North Carolina (TA-W-33,477B), who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after April 8, 1996 
through June 17, 1999, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 31st day of October 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-31055 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
HHF Arizona Date: October 1, 2018

A-1

SCHEDULE A

BASIC INFORMATION

Eligible Entity Information:

Name of the Eligible Entity: Arizona Home Foreclosure Prevention 

Funding Corporation

Corporate or other organizational form: Arizona Non-Profit corporation 

Jurisdiction of organization: Arizona domiciliary

Notice Information:

HFA Information:

Name of HFA: State of Arizona, Arizona Department of 

Housing

Organizational form: Constituent Department of the State of 

Arizona

Date of Application: April 16, 2010

Date of Action Plan: September 1, 2010 

Notice Information:

Program Participation Cap: $296,146,720.00

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Original HHF Funds: $125,100,000.00

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Unemployment HHF Funds: N/A

Rounds 1-4 Funding Allocation: $267,766,006.00

Round 5 Funding Allocation: $28,380,714.00

Program Funds: $259,366,975.00

Permitted Expenses: $36,779,745.00

Closing Date: June 23, 2010

First Amendment Date: September 23, 2010

Second Amendment Date: September 29, 2010
HHF Arizona Date: October 1, 2018

A-2

Third Amendment Date: December 16, 2010

Fourth Amendment Date: January 26, 2011

Fifth Amendment Date: March 31, 2011

Sixth Amendment Date: May 25, 2011

Seventh Amendment Date: August 31, 2011

Eighth Amendment Date: March 29, 2012

Ninth Amendment Date: July 17, 2012

Tenth Amendment Date: August 24, 2012

Eleventh Amendment Date: June 6, 2013

Twelfth Amendment Date: October 30, 2013

Thirteenth Amendment Date: February 27, 2014

Fourteenth Amendment Date: October 10, 2014

Fifteenth Amendment Date: May 21, 2015

Sixteenth Amendment Date: December 18, 2015

Seventeenth Amendment Date: May 3, 2016

Eighteenth Amendment Date: August 31, 2016

Nineteenth Amendment Date: December 19, 2016

Eligible Entity Depository Account Information: See account information set forth in the 

Depository Account Control Agreement 

between Treasury and Eligible Entity 

regarding the HHF Program.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00175-CR

Kyle Scott Huffman

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 9

of Tarrant County (1276840)

July 24, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Anne Gardner__________

 Justice Anne Gardner
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 26, 2012

h0919

Order 

September 26, 2012

144368

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144368

COA: 303624

Wayne CC: 04-009306-FC

DEVON E. SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

MARILYN KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### Robert J. PELLEGRINO, Appellant, v. The MARATHON BANK, a Florida Banking Corporation, Appellee.

No. 78-681.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 22, 1978.

*828Johnston, Burnett, Johnson & Pondolfi and Franklyn A. Johnson, Jr., Fort Myers, for appellant.

Cunningham, Albritton, Bee, Lenzi & Schiller and Peter Joseph Lenzi, Jr., Marathon, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. Steven Lake*Masonry, *Inc., 356*So.2d 1329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); *Smiles v. Young,*271 So.2d 798, 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63204-63205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Number 40-6622]


Pathfinder Mines Corporation

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Amendment of Source Material License SUA-442 to change three 
reclamation milestone dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission has amended Pathfinder Mines Corporation's (PMC's) Source 
Material License SUA-442 to change three reclamation milestone dates. 
This amendment was requested by PMC in

[[Page 63205]]

its letter dated September 11, 1997, and the receipt of the request by 
NRC was noticed in the Federal Register on October 6, 1997.
    The license amendment modifies License Condition 50 to change 
completion dates for three site-reclamation milestones. The new dates 
approved by the NRC extend completion of placement of the interim cover 
over tailings pile by two years, and completion of placement of the 
final radon barrier and placement of the erosion protection cover by 
three years. PMC attributes the delays to a substantial volume of water 
still remaining to be evaporated from the tailings system, before an 
interim cover could be placed. Based on the review of PMC's submittal, 
the NRC staff concludes that the delays are attributable to factors 
beyond the control of PMC, the proposed work is scheduled to be 
completed as expeditiously as practicable, and the added risk to the 
public health and safety is not significant.
    An environmental assessment is not required since this action is 
categorically excluded under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(11), and an environmental 
report from the licensee is not required by 10 CFR 51.60(b)(2).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PMC's amended license, and the NRC staff's 
technical evaluation of the amendment request are being made available 
for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 
L Street, NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC 20555.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mohammad W. Haque, Uranium Recovery 
Branch, Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Telephone (301) 415-6640.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of November, 1997.
Joseph J. Holonich,
Chief, Uranium Recovery Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of 
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 97-31086 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 99.1  CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  I, Eric S. Sprott, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the Trust);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Trusts other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Trust and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Trust, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles:  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.  5. The Trusts other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Trusts auditors and the audit committee of the Trusts board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Trusts ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 28, 2013  /s/   ERIC S. SPROTTEric   S. SprottPrincipal   Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofPhillips Edison – ARC Shopping Center REIT Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the yearended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard J. Smith, the ChiefFinancial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge and belief: 

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

Date: March 7, 2013 

 

|       |                                             |
|------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| * *   | */s/  Richard J. Smith*

                   |
| ** ** | **Richard J. Smith**

*Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

 

----
|   | (1) | the      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended      December 28, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      February 6, 2008 | By:    | /s/Donald G.      DeBuck                                              |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Donald      G. DeBuck                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                         |   | Vice      President and Chief FinancialOfficer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |

----
This letter is an addendum to the loan agreement entered into between Alpine Venture Associates and Asia Private Equity SPAC 3, Ltd on September 22, 2010. The original amount borrowed was $3,149, however only $2,899 was loaned. The remaining $250 will not be loaned. The terms of the loan remain the same as the original loan agreement.
  /s/ Edward James HahnEdward James Hahn

Asia Private Equity SPAC 3, Limited December 3rd, 2010Loan #2 Agreement

$3,149
 This loan agreement (“Loan Number 2”) was entered between Alpine VentureAssociates, LLC(“the Lender’) and Asia Private Equity SPAC 3, Limited(“the Borrower”) on 22nd day of September 2010. The terms of the agreement were as follows:
  Amount borrowed: $3,149 ($2,899 + 250) (Three Thousand One Hundred Forty Nine Dollars)
  Interest rate: zero
 Repayment date: September 22nd, 2013 without any prepayment penalty
 Purpose of loan: working capital and business expansion (USA Accounting $900, USA Audit $3,000)
  Signed:
 /s/ Edward James HahnAsia Private Equity SPAC 3, Limited
  /s/ Edward James HahnAlpine Venture Associates, LLC or Edward James Hahn
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: 11/21/2013 Jenu Gomard <k12jegoma@gmail.com> Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:34 PM EAS (OST) Department ofTransportation Kalaupapa

Dear Department ofTransportation (DOT) I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4 year bidto link Kalaupapato Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experience friendly agents, frequents flights, multiple islands and ease ofbooking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, Travelocity Orbitz, Priceline etc.). Itis important we have safe, stables &affordable serviceto Kalaupapa. Sincerely, Ka'o Gomard

1
# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

### N o . 1 1 - 1 1 3 1 S e p t e m b e r T e r m 2 0 1 1 EPA -76FR15 372 EPA -76FR15 454 Filed O n: Novemb er 28 , 20 11 Nation al Asso ciation of Clean W ate r Agencies, Pet itione r
v
. Environme nta l Prote ction Agency and Lisa Perez Jackson , Ad min istrator, E PA,

Respo nde nts

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Conso lidate d with 11-1 167 , 11 -118 5

BEFORE: Garlan d, B row n, a nd Kavana ugh, Circuit Ju dges O R D E R Upon con siderat ion o f

the m otion for lea v e to inte rv ene ou t of tim e, t he opp osition s the reto, an d th e rep ly ; th e m otion for sta y , th e o ppo sitions t here to, and the replies; and the m otion for lea v e to f ile a su r-reply, it is ORDERED tha t th e m otion for lea v e to inte rv ene ou t of tim e b e grante d. Inte rv eno r MaxW est E nvironm ent al System s, In c., is rem inde d th at “a n int erv enin g party ma y

join issu e o nly on a ma tter t hatha s be en brou ght be fore t he court by anot her party.” Bee tho v en. com LL C v . Lib rarian o f Congress, 3 94 F.3d 93 9, 9 46 (D.C. Cir. 200 5) (intern al quota tions om itted ); D.C. Cir. Rule 2 8(d)(2). I t is FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e m otion for lea v e to f ile a su r-reply be d enie d. T he court did n ot co nside r any argume nts m ade for th e f irst time in th e rep ly . S ee Qw est S erv ices Corp. v. FCC , 50 9 F.3 d 5 31, 53 6 (D.C. Cir. 20 07). It is USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1344244 Filed: 11/28/2011 Page 1 of 2

# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

### N o . 1 1 - 1 1 3 1 S e p t e m b e r T e r m 2 0 1 1

FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e m otion s for sta y be de nied . P etition ers ha v e n ot satisf ied t he stringent requirem ent s for a stay pen ding cou rt revi ew. See W inter v. Natura l Res. Def . Cou ncil, 55 5 U.S . 7, 20 (200 8); D.C. Circuit Han dbo ok o f Practice and Int erna l Proced ures 3 3 (20 11). Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Jenn ifer M. Clark Depu ty Cl erk/LD

Page 2 USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1344244 Filed: 11/28/2011 Page 2 of 2
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the County Court at Law No. 4 of Williamson County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on May 16,

2017, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of T.C.A and M.A.A., Children

Case Number: 07-17-00134-CV Trial Court Number: 06-178-FC4

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated May 16, 2017, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on August 2, 2017

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
#### J. W. QUEEN, Individually and for the Use and Benefit of his minor son, R. Queen v. David R. LAMANA et al.

No. 62368.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: J. W. Queen applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1998
<CASH>                                          52,863
<SECURITIES>                                    13,293
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,190
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,854
<PP&E>                                          21,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,500
<BONDS>                                          1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,220
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   283,650
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,880
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  236,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,810)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,566
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,574
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,992
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,992
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93


</TABLE>