alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40938 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GERONIMO FERNANDO HUEZO-FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-215-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Geronimo Fernando Huezo-Franco appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. Huezo argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Huezo’s argument concerning the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is, as he concedes, foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S.No. 04-40938 -2- 224, 235 (1998) ; United States v. Izaguirre-Flores , 405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 253 (2005). Huezo also contends that his sentence is improper under Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), and United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). He concedes that the plainerror standard of review applies. Huezo has not shown that the district court would have imposed a different sentence under an advisory sentencing scheme. Thus, Huezo has not shown plain error in connection with his sentence. See United States v. Martinez-Lugo , 411 F.3d 597, 600-01 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , ___ S. Ct. ___ (Oct. 11, 2005) (No. 05-6242). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### CHASE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSN. v. The HOME INDEMNITY CO.

No. 39186.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 319.
#### L. C. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 3, 1972.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender; and William C. Owen, Special Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7292

PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RODNEY MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police 

Department; DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., Sheriff, Mecklenburg

County Sheriff Department; JAMES TOWNSEND, Property 

Manager, Monroe Hall; FNU NIPPER, CAT’s Safety Manager; 

SARAH PARKER, North Carolina Chief Justice,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:10-cv-00302-FDW-DSC)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Patrick O. Christian appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Christian v. Moore, No. 3:10-cv-00302-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
#### Frederick Brannon DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-933.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Luis S., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[737 NYS2d 13]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Myrna Martinez-Perez, J.), entered on or about January 26, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed him with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, limited secure, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The court properly credited testimony establishing that appellant was the initial aggressor in this confrontation with a school secretary. With respect to each of the charges, appellant’s intent could be readily inferred from his conduct, including punching the complainant in the face. The physical injury element of third-degree assault was established by the complainant’s testimony, corroborated by photographs and medical records, that her jaw was sore and bruised for a week after the incident, causing pain when eating or otherwise opening her mouth and requiring medication *(see, People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
Exhibit (j)

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of DWS Institutional Funds on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") of
our report dated August 21, 2008 relating to the financial statements and
financial highlights which appears in the June 30, 2008 Annual Report to
Shareholders of Daily Assets Fund Institutional, which is also incorporated by
reference into the Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to
us under the headings "Financial Highlights", "Financial Statements" and
"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such Registration Statement.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1998
<CASH>                                          73,667
<SECURITIES>                                    31,451
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,991
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,261
<PP&E>                                          18,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,764
<BONDS>                                          1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,220
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,472
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,431
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,172
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
• •**~~-"' ~;+..·** **·_** .. _ _ _**-~_,-u·· -~~-~** **-· ..,!.'?**  ....**~-....,. ·~--**  . ., ........**~--- .,~·:::-~** **=----"'S"-'~'t ate**  

### of W1sconsm flf'

.. :,;_- --.:. · - ·' DEP A RTMENT OF NATURAL**RESOU~CES** . tt W lk G l§ ' co a er, overno r 101 S. W ebste r Street**,~** 

# c th St 

## s t Box 7921

. , § · - a Y epp , ecre ary Madison WI 53707-7921 l · J ·· 

# UL 2 3 

## 201 3 Telep hone 608 - 266 - 2621

. Toll F r ee 1 - 888-936-7463
July 15 , 20 1 3 <**~:-l '·** **';-~**

## ~,-~~._ . .. _. · _· : - - ,

## '· :

## -~ --

- 

### .. .. r**~--;,..** - -.· ..**~-·-"l'r' ·** 

Ms. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator USEPA

- Region V (R-19J) 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago IL 60604-3507 TfY Access v ia relay- 711

Subject: Negative declaration for hospital/medical / infectious waste incinerators Dear Ms. Hedman: DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES

EPA promulgated re v ised E mission Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for Hospital/Medical / Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMJWI) on October 6, 2009. On May 13 ,2 013, EPA promulgated the Federal Plan for HMWis
. On page 28055 of78 FR 28052, EPA identifies Wisconsin as potentially submitting a negative declaration
. The Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources (WDNR) is pleased to provide you with this letter informing you that there are no HMIWI units as defined by 40 CFR 60.51(c) currently operating in the s tate of Wisconsin. Therefore , WDNR requests EPA's approval of this negative dec l aration. If you should have any questions regardin g this letter , please feel free to call Ralph Patterson of my staff at 608- 267-7546. Sincerely,

# d~**~---- ---**  Bart Sponseller , Director Dir e ctor , Bureau of Air Management
cc: Joseph Hoch -AM/7 Ralph Patterson

- AM/7 Douglas Aburano- U.S. EPA Region V (AR-18J) Margaret Sieffert- U.S. EPA Region V (AT-18J) Gilberta Alvarez- U.S. EPA Region V (A-18J)

dnr .w i

. go v wisconsin.gov 

## Nat urally 

## WISCONSIN

# ~'**PR /WfED**  • ONREC YCL!:D

PAPER

....**~**
#### Willie James JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00361-CR

Stephen BAUTISTA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-03-048-CRW

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED April 15, 2020.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
1788,

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

June 14, 2012

The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
President of the Senate

United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. President:

As required under clause i) of subparagraph 12)a) of Article 10 (Dividends) of the bilateral
income tax treaty between the United States and Belgium, which entered into force on
December 28, 2007, I certify, on the basis of a report by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
that Belgium has satisfactorily complied with its obligations under Article 25 (Exchange of
Information and Administrative Assistance).

r
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-172234 on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 30, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements and thefinancial statement schedule of Daqo New Energy Corp. and its subsidiaries and variable interest entity, and the effectiveness of Daqo New Energy Corp. and its subsidiaries and variable interest entity’s internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Daqo New Energy Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

/s/ Deloitte ToucheTohmatsu CPA Ltd. 

Shanghai, China 

April 30, 2012
#### Peggy S. WESTBROOK v. Herbert Nelson GRAVES.

No. 50574.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 23, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 4, 1978.

Merrida P. Coxwell, Jackson, for appellant.

Michael B. Martz, Jackson, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; J. C. Stennett, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED.
#### ROAD IN CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP.

APPEAL BY G. D. HEIST PROM TEDS COURT OF QUARTER SESSIONS OE MONTGOMERY COUNTY.

Argued February 2, 1891

Decided February 16, 1891.

The provision of the act of May 8, 1889, P. L. 129, (fixing the number of road and bridge viewers,) that “ this act shall not apply to counties having local acts inconsistent herewith,” does not render the act unconstitutional, as violative of § 7, article III., of the constitution.

Before Paxson, C. J., Green, Clark, Williams, McCollum and Mitchell, JJ.

■No. 378 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, number and term not given.

On September 3, 1889, upon tbe petition of citizens of Cheltenham township, three persons were appointed viewers to lay out a public road. The report of the viewers in. favor of opening the road was filed on October 12* 1889, confirmed nisi, and the width thereof fixed. On December 2d, Geo. D. Heist filed exceptions, inter alia, as follows:

3. The act of assembly under which the court appointed but three viewers is unconstitutional, inasmuch as it offends against § 7, article III., of the constitution of Pennsylvania. The court, therefore, did not possess jurisdiction to appoint three viewers to view said proposed road.

After argument, the exceptions were dismissed and the report of the viewers confirmed, when the exceptant took this appeal, assigning the dismissal of the foregoing exception for error.

*Mr. B. E.*Chain, for the appellant.

Counsel cited: Evans v. Phillipi, 117 Pa. 226; McCarthy v. Commonwealth, 110 Pa. 243; Scranton School D.’s App., 113 Pa. 176; Malloy v. Commonwealth, 115 Pa. 25.

*Mr. Chas.*Hunsicker, for the appellees, was not heard.

*137Per Curiam:

The single assignment of error presents the question of the constitutionality of the act of May 8, 1889, P. L. 129. The said act is as follows:

> “ Section 1. ’That in all proceedings to lay out or vacate a public or private road, or to assess damages as provided by law, to fix the site of a county bridge and to accept the same when repaired or completed according to existing laws, the viewers, reviewers, etc., shall consist of three fair, judicious, and impartial persons, one of whom shall be a surveyor, to be appointed as now provided by law.

> “ This act shall not apply to counties having local acts inconsistent herewith.”

The supposed vice of the act consists in the last paragraph, which declares that it shall not apply to counties having local acts inconsistent therewith. From this it was argued the law was local, and therefore unconstitutional. We regard the language referred to as merely intended to preserve the local laws in force at the time of its passage. As they drop out by their repeal from time to time, the act of 1889 will take their place: Evans v. Phillipi, 117 Pa. 226. Such counties will not then have a local law inconsistent with said act. Any other construction would prevent the legislature from passing any general law, without at the same time repealing in terms every local law in conflict with it. The proceedings are

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135628 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135628 COA: 272366 Wayne CC: 05-008877-01 RONALD JAY FOSTER II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40341 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. LUIS ENRIQUE LOPEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-328-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Cri minal Case, Luis Enrique Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and nota separatecriminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 15.2



April 30, 2013



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



We have readItem 16F of
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd’s Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2012
and are in agreement with the statements contained in paragraph (a) (2) and in the first, second, third, fourth and sixth paragraphs
of (b) (1) on page  104 therein. We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained
therein.





/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming LLP



Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China
2021_Shelby_MOVESInput s _Screenshot
# Summary

HAF Quarterly Report - Submissions Status - Q3 20231,2,3

# Demographics by Type

HAF Q3 2023 Quarterly Report  - Application Data Breakdown1,2,3

# Assistance by Participant

HAF Q3 2023 Quarterly Report  - Breakdown of Participant Program Assistance to households1,2

# Applications by Participant

HAF Q3 2023 Quarterly Report  - Breakdown of Applications by Participant1,2,3,4,5

# Disaggregated Demographics

HAF Q3 2023 Quarterly Report  - Approved Application Disaggregated Demographics by Participant1,2,3,4,5

# image1.png
#### Judson Wayne SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 5, 1969.

P. B. Howell, Jr., Leesburg, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

While Smith was held in the Leesburg jail on a traffic charge, officers searched the trunk of his car without a warrant. Evidence found there was used in this prosecution for breaking and entering. A timely motion to suppress was filed, and it should have been granted. In fairness to the able trial judge it must be said that Smith’s trial counsel, not named either here or in our former opinion at 222 So.2d 45, did not bring to the attention of the court Courington v. State, Fla. 1954, 74 So. 2d 652, which compels reversal for a new trial. See also Chimel v. California (1969), 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685.

Reversed and remanded.

LILES, Acting C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger
S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


November 12, 2004

/s/ Roger S. Marcus
------------------------
Roger S. Marcus
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       40
Treasury approves Michigan’s plan to invest $238.1 million of CPF funding 

in broadband infrastructure projects that will provide high-quality 

internet to locations that lack access to adequate service.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Michigan

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $238.1 million for Broadband Infrastructure (100% of program

allocation)

 Locations to Be Served: 67,857 (estimated)

 Program Description: Michigan’s Realizing Opportunity

with Broadband Infrastructure Networks (ROBIN) program

is a competitive grant program designed to provide

funding to extend broadband infrastructure and service to

locations currently lacking access to at least

100/20 Mbps.

‒ ROBIN is designed to provide internet service with speeds of 100/100 Mbps symmetrical to 

households and businesses upon project completion.

‒ Each of the internet service providers funded by ROBIN will participate in the FCC’s 

Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) – a $30 per month subsidy for low-income families. 

 Key State Contact: The Michigan High Speed Internet Office (MIHI) within the Michigan

Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity (LEO)

Michigan Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

As reported by Michigan, 

estimates show that 

investments made using the 

Capital Projects Fund will 

serve 23% of locations 

still lacking high-speed 

internet access in the state.

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information