alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

 

TREASURY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RACIAL EQUITY (TACRE) - March 9, 2023

Agenda*

Call to Order/Roll Call 2:00 – 2:05 Snider Page, DFO 

Opening Remarks 2:05 – 2:10 Felicia Wong, Vice Chair

Overview of Strategic Questions

Presented to Subcommittee for Consideration 2:10 – 2:15 Janis Bowdler, Counselor for

Racial Equity

Subcommittee Presentations on Recommended 

Priorities for Committee Consideration 2:15 – 3:15 All

• Research and Data Equity 2:15 – 2:30 Dr. Dorothy Brown & 

Dr. John Friedman 

• IRA Implementation 2:30 – 2:45 Amanda Renteria 

• Financial Health & Capital Access 2:45 – 3:00 Bulbul Gupta & Valerie RedHorse Mohl

• Internal Staffing and Culture 3:00 – 3:15 Gary Cunningham 

Discussion/Vote on Priority 

Recommendations for the Committee 3:15 – 4:15 All 

Treasury’s Response to TACRE Priority 4:15 – 4:20 Janis Bowdler, Counselor for 

Recommendations Racial Equity 

Review of Public Comments 4:20 – 4:35 Felicia Wong, Vice Chair

Submission of Records for Government Travel 4:35 – 4:40 Snider Page, DFO

New Business/Next Meeting (June 8th) 4:40 – 5:00 Felicia Wong, Vice Chair

Adjourn

*Times and Presenters Subject to Change
#### TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE CO. v. RUTKIN.

No. 38420.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1


















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002












In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of iGambit, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Salerno, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By:
/s/ John SalernoJohn SalernoPrincipal Executive Officer




February 23, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                            CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                               TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
                             (Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             MARCH       DECEMBER
                                                              2001         2000
                                                           ----------   ----------
<S>                                                        <C>          <C>
EARNINGS
      Net Income for Common Stock                          $  573,815   $  582,835
      Preferred Dividends                                      13,593       13,593
      Income Tax                                              315,899      307,168
                                                           ----------   ----------

              Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax        903,307      903,596

FIXED CHARGES*                                                445,542      431,217
                                                           ----------   ----------
              Total Earnings Before Federal Income Tax
                 and Fixed Charges                         $1,348,849   $1,334,813
                                                           ==========   ==========


      * Fixed Charges

      Interest on Long-Term Debt                           $  367,415   $  351,410
      Amortization of Debt Discount, Premium and Expense       12,474       12,584
      Interest on Component of Rentals                         17,609       17,697
      Other Interest                                           48,044       49,526
                                                           ----------   ----------

              Total Fixed Charges                          $  445,542   $  431,217
                                                           ==========   ==========


      Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                         3.03         3.10
</TABLE>
Daily Debt Subject to Limit Activity

($ millions)

Treasury Bills Net

Treasury Notes Net

Treasury Bonds Net

Marketable Inflation Compensation

Marketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment

Total Marketable Activity 

11/26/2021

-17,003

23,999

0

0

304

7,300

11/29/2021

0

0

0

0

455

455

11/30/2021

-40,015

95,868

24,895

400

105

81,253

12/1/2021

0

0

0

0

153

153

Airport and Airway Trust Fund

Civil Service Retirement and Disability Trust Fund

Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund

Department of Defense Medicare Eligible Retiree Fund

Employees' Health Benefits Fund

Employees' Life Trust Fund

Exchange Stabilization Fund

Deposit Insurance Fund

Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund

FHA, Mutual Mortgage Insurance Capital Reserve Account, HUD

Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund

Federal Old-Age And Survivors Insurance Trust Fund

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund

Foreign Service Retirement And Disability Fund

Highway Trust Fund

National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund

Deposits, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Bonus Bids, MMS

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund

Postal Service Fund

Railroad Retirement Account

Thrift Savings Fund

Unemployment Trust Fund

Nonmarketable TIPS Inflation Adjustment

Nonmarketable Inflation Compensation

All Other Trust Funds

Total Government Account Series (Net) 

0

0

0

-7

663

53

0

-6

512

0

451

3,246

-709

0

-607

-9

0

-8

0

-1,225

34

-9,846

-112

207

0

24

-7,340 

0

0

673

-12

275

-1

0

-52

31

0

510

2,771

-978

3

0

1

0

1

0

-157

48

-3,706

-47

310

0

-213

-543 

0

0

-72

-356

-77

-3

0

202

551

6

208

4,012

-2,549

-1

-1

0

0

-520

0

41

38

-81,231

-164

104

0

-2,112

-81,924 

0

-1,337

-5,249

350

1,835

75

0

1

-8

0

-11,754

-28

-18,541

-85

0

0

0

1

0

171

-789

37,098

-645

103

0

2,321

3,520 

Certificates of Indebtedness

Discount Adjustment

Domestic Series

Foreign Series

State and Local Government Series

Tax and Loss Bonds

United States Savings Bonds

20

-9

0

0

0

0

30

0

37

0

0

0

0

52

15

648

0

0

-4

0

12

45

12

0

0

-4,071

0

340

Total Non-Marketable Activity (Net) -7,300 -455 -81,253 -153 

Daily Public Debt Activity 0 0 0 0 

Total Public Debt Subject to Limit 28,881,438 28,881,438 28,881,438 28,881,438 

Daily Extraordinary Measures 

Investments Suspended (-)/Reinvested (+) -10,474 -4,248 -81,408 43,649 
 

 

 

 

 

DEBT SUBJECT TO LIMIT 

EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES

($ billions)

Date 12/1/2021

Impacted

Funds

Measures

Authorized

Measures

Used

Measures

Remaining

CSRDF 1/ 63 (63) 0

G Fund 278 (217) 61

ESF 23 0 23

Totals* 363 (279) 84

*Differences may occur due to rounding.

1/ Includes Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, and Postal

Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. Assumes Debt Issuance

Suspension Period (DISP) ends on December 15, 2021. The value

of early redemptions authorized is $0 as of December 1, 2021.
#### Vincent CATALDO, Appellant, v. RADER & ASSOCIATES et al., Appellees.

No. 71-1327.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 14, 1973.

Feldman & Abramson, Miami, for appellant.

Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Nie-moeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellees.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on December 5, 1972 (270 So.2d 405) affirming the final summary judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, 287 So.2d 63 by its opinion and judgment filed June 27, 1973 and mandate now lodged in this court quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings;

Now, Therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued on January 9, 1973 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed December 5, 1972 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the final summary judgment of the circuit court appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**   **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2005, for each of PNM Resources, Inc. and Public Service Company of New Mexico("Companies"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8,2005 ("Report"), I, John R. Loyack, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     theReport fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| Date:   August 8, 2005 | By: | /s/ John R. Loyack        |
|----------------------------------|-----|---------------------------|
|                                  |     | John R. Loyack            |
|                                  |     | Senior Vice President and |
|                                  |     | Chief Financial Officer   |
#### Dallas Grant CLICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. II-241.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 1978.

O. E. Adams, Sr., Pensacola, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED..

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2208 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2208

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2021

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-
Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair Opportunity Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes 
of Texas Restoration Act (Public Law 100-89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    ``Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude or limit the 
applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 
seq.).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2021.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.2



AMENDMENT 2017-1 TO THE SYSCO CORPORATION
2007 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 



WHEREAS, Sysco Corporation (“Sysco”) maintains the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as approved by shareholders, effective November 9, 2007 (the “2007 LTI Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6 of the 2007 LTI Plan, the Board may amend the Plan from time to time, subject to restrictions contained therein;
WHEREAS, Section 5.3 of the 2007 LTI Plan permits a participant to satisfy any required tax withholding through the surrender of shares granted under the LTI Plan, but only to the extent of the minimum amount permitted to be withheld under applicable law; 
WHEREAS, Accounting Standards Update 2016-09 from the Financial Accounting Standards Board, effective for Sysco in fiscal 2018, modifies the accounting treatment that results from tax withholding of shares awarded under the 2007 LTI Plan at a rate in excess of the statutory minimum;
WHEREAS, the New York Stock Exchange, in response to ASU 2016-09, has provided that an amendment to an equity compensation plan to permit withholding of shares based on a grantee’s maximum tax obligation (rather than a statutory minimum tax rate) is not a material revision requiring shareholder approval;
WHEREAS, the Section 3.1 of the 2007 LTI Plan prohibits the reissuance under the 2007 LTI Plan of any shares surrendered or withheld as payment of withholding taxes in respect of an Award; and
WHEREAS, Sysco desires to amend the 2007 LTI Plan to permit all participants that continue to hold unexercised Stock Option awards under the 2007 LTI Plan additional alternatives to satisfy any tax withholding obligations.
NOW, THEREFORE, Section 5.3 of the 2007 LTI Plan is hereby amended in its entirety, effective as of July 1, 2017, to read as follows (new text in bold and italics):
“5.3 Tax Withholding.  All distributions under the Plan are subject to withholding of all applicable taxes, and the Committee may condition the delivery of any shares or other benefits under the Plan on satisfaction of the applicable withholding obligations. The Committee, in its discretion, and subject to such requirements as the Committee may impose prior to the occurrence of such withholding, may permit such withholding obligations to be satisfied through cash payment by the Grantee, through the surrender of shares of Stock which the Grantee already owns, or through the surrender of unrestricted shares of Stock to which but only to the extent of the maximum individual tax rate permitted to be withheld in the applicable tax jurisdiction.”















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Sysco Corporation has caused this Amendment 2017-1 to be executed, effective as set forth herein. 


SYSCO CORPORATION
                            
By: /s/ Russell Libby            
Russell Libby, Executive Vice President
Administration & Corporate Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2079 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2079

    To provide that CARES Act Provider Relief Fund payments are not 
          includible in gross income, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2021

 Mrs. Axne (for herself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and Mr. Dunn) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide that CARES Act Provider Relief Fund payments are not 
          includible in gross income, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating the Provider Relief Fund 
Tax Penalties Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. CARES ACT PROVIDER RELIEF FUND PAYMENTS EXCLUDED FROM GROSS 
              INCOME.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 
any CARES Act Provider Relief Fund payment shall not be included in the 
gross income of the recipient of such payment.
    (b) Clarification of Treatment of Certain Expenses.--For purposes 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, any deduction and the basis of any property shall be 
determined without regard to whether any amount is excluded from gross 
income under subsection (a).
    (c) CARES Act Provider Relief Fund Payment.--For purposes of this 
section, the term ``CARES Act Provider Relief Fund payment'' means any 
grant or similar assistance provided by the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services under the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund program 
(including any amounts made available to carry out such program by the 
Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, or any other provision of law 
enacted after the date of the enactment of such Acts).
    (d) Effective Date.--The provisions of this section shall apply to 
taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of the CARES Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000022301
<NAME> COMCAST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             652
<SECURITIES>                                     2,975
<RECEIVABLES>                                      707
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (147)
<INVENTORY>                                        373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,828
<PP&E>                                           6,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,773)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,097
<BONDS>                                         10,219
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              585
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           905
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,332
<SALES>                                          3,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,851
<CGS>                                          (1,015)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (3,841)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   549
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (332)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   227 <F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (153)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                73
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (16)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (4)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<FN>
<F1>
Income before income tax expense and other items excludes the effect of
minority interests, net of tax, of $60.9.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Norbert NYSTROM et al., Appellees.

No. 72-569.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 19, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stephen R. Booker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
256 La. 771

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Frances CUCHINELLI.

No. 50766.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 30, 1970.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ granted.

ORDER

Writ granted.

Bail for the defendant is recalled and it is ordered that she be returned to custody. The place of commitment required by reason of her state of physical or mental condition is to be determined by the trial court according to law.

The trial court is ordered to immediately consider and rule upon the alternative motion for a speedy trial and the State is ordered to proceed with arraignment and trial in compliance with the trial court’s orders, and not inconsistent with this order.
## Wall

- E 550

Specs:

Frame size: 550mm Carbon Fiber

Prop size : 12in Carbon fiber

Take off weight : 7lbs ( Including Camera and battery)

Power plant: Four Sunny Sky Brush less Electric Motors rated at 370 KV developing 4 .07 lbs. of

thrust each totaling at 16.28 lbs. total thrust.

Energy source : O ne Lithium P olymer 5800m AH 6 cell 45c Battery

Flight time: 15 min Landing with 20% reserves in the battery

.

Payload : Gopro hero 4 and gimbal, secondary backup CC TV camera and VTX (video down link)Flight computer: X aircraft Mini X flight controller with GPS and OSD(on screen display ) for

constant monitoring of flight parameters such as, Air speed, a ltitude , attitude, battery voltage

and home point tak e off

.

Ground control : Futaba 14SG and d edi cated quad diversity FPV monitor

.

Ma x Flight Speed: 30 MPH

Fail Safes: Retur n to home

, in the event of signal loss the Wall

- E 550 will return to the lift off

po int and land safely

. This can also be activated and deactivated by the pilot at any time within

signal range.
BE IT REMEMBERED:

THAT at the term of the Honorable Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of the State of Texas, begun and holden at Waco on the 1st day of January, 2015, present Chief Justice TOM GRAY and Justices REX D. DAVIS and AL SCOGGINS

In the cause

No. 10-15-00174-CR

IN RE TERRY LEE NELSON

Original Proceeding

the following Judgment was entered on the 28th day of May, 2015:

“Came on to be heard on the original Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed in this Court on May 19, 2015, by Relator Terry Lee Nelson, and the same having been considered, because it is the opinion of the Court that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus be, and hereby is, dismissed.  It is further ordered that the Relator Terry Lee Nelson, pay all costs in this behalf expended and incurred in this Court.”

I, SHARRI ROESSLER, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of Texas, at the City of Waco, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Judgment entered herein by this Court in the above entitled and numbered cause as appears of record in Minute Book 13, Page 493.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the seal of said Court at Waco, this 28th day of May A.D. 2015.

SHARRI ROESSLER, Clerk

						By: ___________________________

Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.jpeg

# image2.png
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50074 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLES RAY WATERS, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 94-CR-342-1

- - - - - - - - - - (March 31, 1995) Before DUHÉ, WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Ray Waters, Sr., filed an appeal from an order of the district court revoking bond pending sentencing. On remand, the district court issued an order reinstating the bond and releasing Waters from custody. In view of the disposition, the appeal is moot; therefore, it is DISMISSED.