alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Wilder Filing, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joel Schonfeld, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Joel SchonfeldJoel Schonfeld, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive OfficerWilder Filing, Inc.May 6, 2011
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
MICHAEL J. SHEA, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMPUTER HORIZONS CORP.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a)    designed
such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

(b)    evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.    The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

|Date:                                                      |  | January 21, 2004 |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Michael J. SheaMICHAEL J. SHEA
Chief Financial Officer |  |                  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of Roberta S. Schwartz, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[736 NYS2d 279]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1987. She maintained an office for the practice of law in Connecticut, where she was also admitted to practice.

Respondent resigned from the Connecticut Bar, effective July 31, 2001, forfeiting any rights to be reinstated at a later date. At the time, serious allegations of professional misconduct were pending against her and she was under suspensión for failure to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent *(see,*22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not replied to the motion or otherwise appeared in this matter.

Under the circumstances presented, we grant petitioner’s motion and further conclude that the interests of justice warrant respondent’s disbarment *(see, e.g., Matter of Steinbach,*228 AD2d 88). We note that respondent has been suspended *803from practice in New York since 1998 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements (see, *Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a,*255 AD2d 827).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is disbarred and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further ordered that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, and is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules *(see,*22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys.
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA
, Appell ee ,

v.

ARSEN MOORADIAN, JR.
, Appell ant

.
N o . 1 CA

- CR 13

- 0591

Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR

- 2012

- 030152

- 001 SE The Honorable Bruce R. Cohen
, Judge

AFFIRMED

COUNSEL
Arizona Attorney General’s Office , Phoenix By Joseph T. Maziarz Counsel for Appellee

Maricopa County Public Defender ’s Office, Phoenix By Paul J. Prato C ounsel for Appell antSTATE V. MOORADIAN Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION
Judge Jon W. Thompson delivered the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Andrew W. Gould and Judge Peter B. Swann joined.

T H O M P S O N , Judge:

¶1 This case comes to us as an appeal under Anders v. California
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Sta te v. Leon , 104 Ariz. 297, 451 P.2d 878 (1969). Counsel for Arsen Mooradian
, Jr. (defendant) has advised us that, after searching the entire record, he has been unable to discover any arguable questions of law and has filed a brief requesting this court co nduct an Anders review of the record. Defendant has been afforded an opportunity to file a supplemental brief in propria persona, but has not done so.

¶2 Defendant and two other men were observed engaging in drug activity in a parked car at Casino Arizo na

. When police arrived at the scene, the car was filled with smoke and the d efendant was sitting in the driver’s seat

. While searching the vehicle, an officer found a plastic baggy containing marijuana and a brown glass pipe

. After receiving a Miranda warni ng, defendant admitted “we a ll shared the pipe.”

¶3 The state charged defendant with possession of d rug paraphernalia, a class 6 felony

. Following a bench trial in which the securi ty officer, police officer and a forensic scientist testified, t he court found defendant guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia, a class 1 misdemeanor

. The court suspended d efendant ’s sentence and he was placed on one year unsupervised probation.STATE V. MOORADIAN Decision of the Court

3 ¶4 We have read and considered defendant’s Anders brief, and we have searched the ent ire record for reversible error. See Leon , 104 Ariz. at 300, 451 P.2d at 881. We find none. All of the proceedings were conducted in compliance with the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the sentence imposed was within the statutory limits. Pursuant to State v. Shattuck , 140 Ariz. 582, 584

- 85, 684 P.2d 154, 156

- 57 (1984), defendant’s counsel’s obligations in this appeal are at an end.

¶5 We affirm the conviction and the sentence.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00036-CR

Douglas Wayne Stidham, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2007-285, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Douglas Wayne Stidham seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for injury to an

elderly person. The trial court has certified that: (1) this is a plea bargain case and Stidham has no

right of appeal, and (2) Stidham waived his right of appeal. The pro se notice of appeal was also

untimely. The appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 26.2(a).

___________________________________________

Diane Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 6, 2008

Do Not Publish
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63141-63142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31002]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-91-000]

Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

November 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 14, 1997, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box 1188, Houston, Texas 77251-
1188, filed in Docket No. CP98-91-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 18 CFR 157.212) for authorization to 
construct, own, and operate a lateral and a new meter station in Pasco 
County, Florida, under FGT's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP82-553-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more 
fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    FGT proposes to construct a new meter station to serve Florida 
Power Corporation (FPC) at the FPC Anmclote Plant and a new lateral to 
extend from FGT's 30-inch West leg to the FPC Anclote Plant. The meter 
station is expected to accommodate the current

[[Page 63142]]

and future anticipated volumes of up to 100,000 MMBtu per day of 
natural gas. FGT estimates the cost of the construction of the proposed 
lateral at $13,363,000, of which amount FGT would not be reimbursed, 
and the construction cost related to the meter station to be $465,000, 
of which FGT would be reimbursed, exclusive of tax gross up.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31002 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Treasury approves Arizona’s plan to invest $83 million of CPF funding in a 

multi-purpose community facility to improve resources for communities 

that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Arizona

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

 Program Summary: $83 million for a Multi-Purpose Community Facility (44% of CPF 

allocation)

 Program Description: Arizona will fund the construction of the

McCain Library, located on the McCain Campus near Papago

Park in Phoenix, AZ, adjacent to Arizona State University’s

Tempe Campus. The new 83,000 square foot multi-purpose

facility named after the late Senator John McCain, will provide

education, work, and health monitoring programs to underserved

communities. In partnership with the McCain Institute and ASU, the McCain Library will play 

an important role in bridging the digital divide for community members by providing a physical 

space and technology for telemedicine, health screenings and monitoring, job fairs, 

employment training programs, and skills development training classes.

 Key State Contact: The Office of the Arizona Governor 

Arizona’s Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Arizona estimates the 

library will benefit 

more than 50,000 

individuals annually.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

Investment Company Act file number  811-06698

 

DWS Equity 500 Index Portfolio

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 06/30/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

----
No. 72-6345.

#### Kimbel *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31038]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Performance Review Board; Membership; Senior Executive Service

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the 
Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail T. Lovelace, Director of Human 
Resources, General Services Administration, 1800 F Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-0398.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Section 4313(c) (1) through (5) of Title 5 
U.S.C. requires each agency to establish in accordance with regulations 
prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more 
Performance Review Board(s). The Board(s) shall review the performance 
rating of each senior executive's performance by the supervisor, along 
with any recommendation to the appointing authority relative to the 
performance of the senior executive.
    Members of the Review Board are:
    1. Thurman M. Davis, Sr. (Chairperson), Deputy Administrator.
    2. Martha N. Johnson, Chief of Staff.
    3. Dennis J. Fisher, Commissioner, Federal Technology Service.
    4. Robert A. Peck, Commissioner, Public Buildings Service.
    5. Frank P. Pugliese, Commissioner, Federal Supply Service.
    6. G. Martin Wagner, Associate Administrator for Governmentwide 
Policy.

    Dated: November 20, 1997.
Gail T. Lovelace,
Director of Human Resources.
[FR Doc. 97-31038 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BR-M
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Thomas A. Franza,
Chief Executive Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 14, 2004 |  | /s/ Thomas A. Franza   
|                        |  | Thomas A. Franza       
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



38
Subject: Emergency Capital Investment Program - Extension of QSR Submission Deadline

Dear ECIP Participant:

Treasury previously announced a schedule for submission of Quarterly Supplemental Reports from the 

date of investment through the quarter ending June 30, 2023. Treasury has not yet received final 

approval on the forms and instructions and as a result, Treasury has extended the due dates for the 

Quarterly Supplemental Reports as follows:

Period of Activity

Schedules 

Required Report Due Date

Closing Date - June 30, 2022 A & B 30 calendar days after publication of final forms 

and instructions on the Treasury ECIP webpage.

July 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022 A & B 30 calendar days after publication of final forms 

and instructions on the Treasury ECIP webpage.

October 1, 2022 - December 31, 2022 A & B 30 calendar days after publication of final forms 

and instructions on the Treasury ECIP webpage.

Closing Date - December 31, 2022 

Annual Report

C & D (for 2022 

lending)

30 calendar days after publication of final forms 

and instructions on the Treasury ECIP webpage.

January 1, 2023 - March 30, 2023 A & B 30 calendar days after publication of final forms 

and instructions on the Treasury ECIP webpage.

April 1, 2023 – June 30, 2023 A & B 30 calendar days after publication of final forms 

and instructions on the Treasury ECIP webpage.

Please contact ecip@treasury.gov with any questions. 

The ECIP team
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-1533V Filed: May 26, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HEATHER RYAN, also known as * HEATHER CAHILL, *

* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine * Administration (“SIRVA”); SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner. Debra A. Filteau Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On November 16, 2016, petitioner fil ed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that her influenza (“flu”) vaccination on September 30, 2015 caused her to suffer a shoulder injury re lated to vaccine admini stration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 25, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to com pensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “has determined that t he alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA that was caused by the administrati on of petitioner’s flu vaccination.” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees t hat no other cause has been i dentified “for petitioner’s

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 shoulder injury, and the medical records . . . show that she suffered the residual effects
of her condition for more than six months.” Id. Finally, respondent indicates that “based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act.” Id. (citing See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-13(a)(1)(B); 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(D)(i)).

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master