T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H on orabl e P atri ci a C . F aw se tt , S eni or U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ct ** Judge f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E S T E L I T O C A R P I O A D I O V A , J r ., P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73361 A ge nc yN o. A 047- 899- 129 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M a y14, 2010 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: H U G and M cK E O W N , C i rc ui tJudg es , and F A W S E T T , S eni or D i stri ct Judg e. ** E s t e l i t o C a rpi o A di ova , J r . , na t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of the P hi l i ppi ne s , pe t i t i ons thi s c ou rtt o v ac at e the order of re m ov alent er ed by the Im m i grat i on Judg e ( “ IJ ”) a n da f f irm e db yth e B o a r do f

I m m ig r a tio n ( “B I A ” ) . I n 2 0 0 4 , A d io v aa d m itte dto



# FI LED MA Y25 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

c onvi c t i ons unde rC a l i f orni aP e na l C ode § 496( a ) f orr e c e i vi ng s t ol e n pr ope rtya nd C al i forni a H ea l th and S af ety C od e § 11 37 7(a) for posse ss i on of a c on trol l ed s ubs t a nc e . I n 2007, he w a s a ga i n c onvi c t e d unde r§ 496( a ) . T he I Jf ound A di ova r e m o v ab le b e c au s e , in te ra lia , hi s tw o con vi ct i on s und er§ 4 96 (a ) qual i fi ed as c o n v ic tio n s f

o rtw o c r im e s in v o lv in g m o r a l tu rp itu d e n o t a r is in g o u t o f as in g le sc hem e of c ri m i nal m i sc on du ct . 8 U . S . C . § 1 22 7(a) (2)( A )( i i ). T he B IA af fi rm ed th e I J ’s d e c is io n o n th is g r o u n do n ly , n o tin g th a t av io la tio n o f § 4 9 6 ( a ) is c a te g o r ic a llyac r im e in v o lv in g m o r a l tu rp itu d e . A f t e rthe B I A r e nde r e d i t s de c i s i on, w e he l d tha tac onvi c t i on f oravi ol a t i on of C al i forni a P enal C od e § 49 6(a) i s notca t egori ca l l y acr i m e i nv ol vi ng m oral turpi tud e. C as t i l l o-C ruz v. H ol der, 58 1 F . 3d 11 54 , 11 61 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). If a cri m e i s n o tcat eg o ri cal l y a cri m e i n v o l v i n g m o ral tu rp i tu d e, th e co u rtm u st c o n du c t am o d if

ie dc a te g o r ic a l a n a ly s is , c o n s id e r in g o n lyth e r e c o r do f c o n v ic tio n . B e c aus e the a dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e c or d i n thi s c a s e doe s notc ont a i n the r e c or d of conv i ct i on , the go vernm entfa i l ed t o p rove thatA di ov a’ s c on vi ct i on un der § 49 6(a) qu al i fi es as a c ri m e i nv ol vi ng m oral turpi tud e und erthe m od i fi ed ca t egori ca l appr oa c h. W e the r e f

or e gr a ntthe pe t i t i on a nd va c a t e the r e m ova l or de rw i thout r e m a n d in g . N o ta s h v . G o n z a le s , 4 2 7 F .3 d6 9 3 , 7 0 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . P E T I T I ON GR AN T E D.