alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Cost for four additional ambient temperature sensors per refrigeration product test station**

**Assumptions** Use of thermocouples with copper weights. Copper masses fabricated from purchased copper rod. Four added sensors. Sensors supported with vertical stand. New stand required due to higher maximum height (1 ft about top of unit rather than 3 ft above the floor). Existing Data Acquisition System Requires Expansion Module and software upgrade to accept four additional temperature inputs (worst case scenario) Equipment life 10 years, test capacity 30 per year.

MATERIALS Item Number Unit CostTotal Cost Copper Mass material 0.5 61.13 $ 30.57

$ Thermocouples, Omega SA1XL-t-120-SRTC (5-pack) 0.8 142.00 $ 113.60

$ Floor Stands 2 49.99 $ 99.98

$ Data Acquisition Expansion Module 1789.00 $ 789.00

$ Updated Data acquisition software 1 220.00 $ 220.00

$ Total, worst case 1,253.15 $ Total, no data acquisition expansion needed 244.15 $
LABOR Task Hours Prepare Copper weights from Copper Rod 2 Assemble Stands, hang and connect sensors 4 Software updating and debugging 4 Total 10 Cost at $25 loaded technician cost 250.00 $ Total, no Data acquisition expansion needed 6 Cost, no Data acquisition expansion needed 150.00 $ low high Total Cost Range 394.15 $ 1,503.15

$

**CALCULATION OF PER-TEST COST** Notes Number of Tests per test station 300 30030 tests per year times 10 years Added cost per test 1.31 $ 5.01

$

**COMPARISON OF ADDED COST TO FACILITY COST** Notes/Source Number of test stations per test chamber 4Cost of chamber 128,000 $ Quote provide by CTS for Morgantown WV refrigerator test facility Building Cost per square foot (US average warehouse) 100 $ RS Means Chamber floorspace 375 15 ft x 25 ft Building Cost 37,500 $ Total chamber/building cost 165,500 $ low high Added cost as percent of chamber/building cost 1.0% 3.6%Sensors supported with vertical stand. New stand required due to higher maximum height (1 ft about top of unit rather than 3 ft above the floor). Existing Data Acquisition System Requires Expansion Module and software upgrade to accept four additional temperature inputs (worst case scenario)

Source McMaster-Carr http://www.mcmaster.com/#8966k225/=rd0ys8 Omega http://www.omega.com/pptst/SA1XL.html Staples http://www.staples.com/office/supplies/StaplesProductDisplay?storeId=10001&catalogIdentifier=2&partNumber=218139&langid=-1&nAID=17588969&KPID=218139 Omega http://www.omega.com/pptst/OMB-DAQ55.html Omega Information obtained on phone; Updated software to handle added sensor inputs.

30 tests per year times 10 years

Notes/SourceQuote provide by CTS for Morgantown WV refrigerator test facility

http://www.reedconstructiondata.com/rsmeans/models/warehouse/http://www.staples.com/office/supplies/StaplesProductDisplay?storeId=10001&catalogIdentifier=2&partNumber=218139&langid=-1&nAID=17588969&KPID=218139 Information obtained on phone; Updated software to handle added sensor inputs.
906 CERTIFICATION OF CERTIFYING OFFICER













CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-K of Curry Gold Corp for the Year Ended November 30, 2010, Soenke Timm, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Curry Gold Corp hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.   Such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Curry Gold Corp.





Dated:  March  14, 2011







Curry Gold Corp





By: /s/ Soenke Timm


Chief Executive Officer








By: /s/ Soenke Timm


Chief Financial Officer
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63099

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 98–21]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Assistance

Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104–

164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 98–21,

with attached transmittal, policy

justification, and sensitivity of

technology pages.

Dated: November 20, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternative OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M
63100 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63101
63102 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63103

[FR Doc. 97–30987 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–C
**
**Exhibit 10.84**

 
Date:  October 22, 2018To:  David CallachorPosition:  Executive Vice President – International
Thank you for your interest in employment with S&W Seed Company. Please accept this letter and attachedcontract as our offer of at-will employment. In your role as Executive Vice President – International, you will report to Mark Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer. 

At S&W Seed Company we greatly value our ability with employees in an environment of trust, respect and integrity in all our relationshipsand maintain an open-door policy in which to foster a mutually respectful working relationship. 

Neither this letter nor the attachedcontract provide in detail all of the Company’s policies. S&W Seed Company retains the sole right to revise, modify, delete or add to any and all policies, procedures, work rules or benefits stated in this letter, the attached contract, andthe Employee Handbook, or any other document, except for the policy of at-will employment. 

Weextend our best wishes to you for a pleasant and successful future with S&W Seed Company. Should you have any questions about this job offer or any of the Company’s policies, benefits or procedures, please contact Mark Wong, President andCEO, or Holly Misenhimer, Global Director Human Resources. 

S&W SEED COMPANY 

Mark Wong 

President &Chief Executive Officer 

ACCEPTANCE: I have read and agree to the terms and conditions above: 

Acceptance Deadline:    October 26, 2018 

Starting Date:                 October 29, 2018 

 

        /s/ David Callachor
  
        10/27/18
David Callachor  Date**

**Schedule 1 – Compensation Package**

 

1. Position Title
  
Executive Vice President International

2. Commencement Date
  
October 29, 2018

3. Location at Commencement
  
South East Queensland, Australia

4. Initial Remuneration Package
  
Base Salary 225,000 USD paid at exchange rate of 0.70AUD for FY2019, reviewed annually.

 

75,000 shares stock on commencement

 

Superannuation 9.5% payable quarterly into employeenominated fund

5. Bonus Scheme
  
100% bonus target

 

All bonus awards would be based on defined goals and are paid 50% in cash, 25% in RSU and 25% in common stock options.

6. Company Vehicle
  
Toyota Prado or equivalent, fully maintained for company purposes. Packing of vehicle via a novated lease possible ofdesired.

7. Other FBT concessional items
  
Phone, laptop and general office equipment supplied.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of China Modern Agricultural Information, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Liu Yanyan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: September 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Liu YanyanLiu YanyanChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)
#### Sammie NAIL, Appellant, v. Judith Barrett GOFF et al., Appellees.

No. 72-727.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Social and Political Science; Notice of 
Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, and amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Social and Political Science (#1761).
    Date and Time: November 20-21, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Department of Political Science, University of 
California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472.
    Contact Person: Dr. Frank Scioli and Dr. Rick Wilson, Program 
Directors for Political Science, National Science Foundation. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1761.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the political science proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.

    Date & Time: December 8-9, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Stafford Place, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Room 970, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Contact Person: Dr. Harmon Hosch, Program Director, Law and 
Social Science, National Science Foundation. Telephone (703) 306-
1762.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Law and Social Science 
Proposals as a part of the selection process for awards.

    Date & Time: December 11-12, 1997 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Stafford Place, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Room 380, Arlington, VA 22230
    Contact Person: Dr. William S. Bainbridge, National Science 
Foundation, Telephone (703) 306-1756
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Sociology proposals as a part 
of the selection process for awards.
    Type of Meetings: Closed
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for research proposals submitted to the NSF for 
financial support.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 31, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-29321 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### LAZO v. PRUDENCE MUTUAL CASUALTY CO.

No. 38158.

Supreme Court of Florid.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 793.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7513
JAMIE RAY EVERETT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus M. E. RAY, Warden; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-1882-13D) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamie Ray Everett, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jamie Ray Everett appeals the district court’s order denyinghis motion for return of the appeal fee. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Everett v. Ray , No. CA-99-1882-13D (D.S.C. Oct. 4, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

d0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148588

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148588

COA: 318300

Houghton CC: 2013

- 002677

- FH

JASON THOMAS JUNTIKKA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to t his Court that the case of

People v Cunningham (Docket No. 147437) is pending on appeal before this Court and

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held i n ABEYANCE pending the

decision in that case.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4235-N-30]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 21, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Johnston, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7256, 
451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1226; 
TDD number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these 
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V 
information line at 1-800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: November 14, 1997.
Fred Karnas, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 97-30595 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Corps of Engineers; Department of the Army


Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) for the Stabilization of the Bluff Toe at Norco Bluffs

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In previous Federal Register notice (Vol 62, No. 105, page 
29719) Monday, June 2, 1997, make the following corrections:
    On Page 29719 in column two, Summary paragraph, lines six through 
eleven, the sentence should be changed to read ``The purpose of the 
proposed project is to stabilize the toe of the bluff parallel to 
Shadow Canyon Circle, Alahambra Street, and River Ridge Drive, as far 
upstream as Crest Drive, in the City of Norco, and thereby maintain the 
location of the 566 foot elevation line.''
    On Page 29719 in column three, Availability of the Draft EIS 
paragraph, change the date from ``September 1997'' to ``March 1998.''
    The above corrections are required to clarify the location of the 
proposed project which has been expanded to cover areas immediately 
upstream and downstream of the originally proposed project, and to 
inform individuals of the change in the availability of the draft EIS 
for publication and circulation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any comments on this increase in 
project area should be sent to Mr. Alex Watt, U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers, Los Angeles district, Programs and Project Management 
Division at (213) 452-3860.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-31037 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-KF-M
#### Dorothy W. BLACKMON, as Executrix of the Estate of William B. Blackmon, M.D., Petitioner, v. Holly Dale HOFMANN, a minor, by and through her father and next friend, Wilbur Dale Hofmann and Wilbur Dale Hofmann, individually, Respondents.

No. 40706.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 9, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 241 So.2d 752.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Maine Acadian Culture Preservation Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) that the Maine Acadian Culture 
Preservation Commission will meet on Friday, December 12, 1997. The 
meeting will convene at 7:00 p.m. in the basement meeting hall, St. 
David Church, on U.S. Route 1, Madawaska, Aroostook County, Maine.
    The Maine Acadian Culture Preservation Commission was appointed by 
the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Maine Acadian Culture 
Preservation Act (Pub. L. 101-543). The purpose of the Commission is to 
advise the National Park Service with respect to:
<bullet> the development and implementation of an interpretive program 
of Acadian culture in the state of Maine.
<bullet> the selection of sites for interpretation and preservation by 
means of cooperative agreements.

    The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:
    1. Review and approval of the summary report of the meeting held 
October 17, 1997.
    2. A talk by Steven White of Moncton, New Brunswick, on ``Acadian 
Genealogy''.
    3. Report of the National Park Service Maine Acadian project staff.
    4. Opportunity for public comment.
    5. Proposed agenda, place, and date of the next Commission meeting.
    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Commission meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Acadia 
National park. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations 
to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be 
made at least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, 
Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, ME 04609-0177; 
telephone (207) 288-5472.

    Dated: November 5, 1997.
Norm Dodge,
Acting Superintendent, Acadia National Park.
[FR Doc. 97-30649 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission

Lawrence Bengal, Director

Shale Play Water Management Congress 2014

Southern States

Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma & Arkansas

November 19 - 20 Dallas, Texas

Regulatory Updates On Water Disposal And Discharge To

Budget For Future Projects And Ensure Compliance
4400+ wells (since 2005)

Fayetteville Shale Production Area

500 new wells completed annually

Shale production area located outside

“ legacy” production area resulting in

very limited fluid disposal options with

no nearby SDW wells, requiring

significant truck transportation during

early development period
Water Disposal - Perspective

2012 Data

 Water Used for hydraulic stimulation – 90.7 million bbls

 Water recovered as flow-back and produced – 18.5 million bbls

 Water Disposed in AR Class II SWD wells – 6.1 million bbls
Arkansas Agencies

Regulating Water Sources, Storage and 

Disposal

 ANRC: Arkansas Natural Resources Commission

 AOGC: Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission 

 ADEQ: Arkansas Depart of Environmental Quality

 USACE: US Army Corps of Engineers

4
Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality

Regulates Class II SWD Well surface facilities
Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission

Issue Permits and Regulate UIC Class II SWD Wells
Fayetteville Shale Production Area

7 SWD Wells

10 SWD Wells

17 SWD Wells -175 miles 

to South Arkansas

150 miles to OK
Disposal Well 

Moratorium in 

Shale Area 

Seismic Permit 

Conditions

Adopted for

Adjacent Areas
Potential for Seismic Activity

Stressed fault (basement)

Communication with fault

Large volume injected

SWD

SWD

SWD

2010 event

1982 event –

22 years 

before shale 

drilling in area
Deep Fault 

Trend
AOGC Rule H-1 – 2011 Rule Amendment to 

Address Potential Seismicity

 Only applies to Fayetteville Shale production area.

 Moratorium area established (4 existing SWD wells 

plugged).

 SWD well set-back from faults (1-5 mile based on 

fault type).

 SWD well spacing (1/2 – 5 miles based on disposal 

zone).
AOGC Rule H-1 – 2011 Rule Amendment to 

Address Potential Seismicity

 Director may require additional seismic

information and fault location during permit

review.

 Well flow meters required and injection pressure

and volume of fluid injected required to be

reported on a daily basis.

 Commission has authority to modify permit

requirements after notice and hearing as new data

developed in future.
QUESTIONS ?