UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2383

FRANK PAUL LUKACS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES; HAROLD E. VARMUS, Doctor,

Director, National Institute of Health;

BERNADINE HEALY, Doctor, Dean, College of

Medicine, Ohio State University; RUTH

KIRSCHSTEIN, Doctor, Deputy Director, National

Institute of Health; NAOMI CHURCHILL, Director, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity;

DIANE ARMSTRONG, National Institute of Health;

LINDA MORRIS, Acting Director, Office of Equal

Opportunity; GILBERT F. CASELLAS, Director,

United States Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission; RONNIE BLUMENTHAL, Director,

Office of Federal Operations, United States

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission;

LORETTA Y. WATSON, Chief, Intake and Control

Branch Compliance and Control Division Office

of Federal Operations; JAMES KING, Director,

Office of Personnel Management; RICHARD

KLAUSNER, Doctor, Director, National Cancer

Institute; EDWARD SONDIK, Doctor, Director,

NCHS,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

No. 98-2384

FRANK PAUL LUKACS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES; HAROLD E. VARMUS, Doctor,

Director, National Institute of Health; RUTH

KIRSCHSTEIN, Deputy Director, National Institute of Health; RICHARD KLAUSNER, Doctor,

Director, National Cancer Institute; NAOMI

CHURCHILL, Director; DIANE ARMSTRONG, Former

Director, OEO NIH; LINDA MORRIS, Acting Director; JANET RENO, United States Attorney

General; GILBERT F. CASELLAS, Director; JAMES

KING, Director, Office of Personnel Management; JANICE LACHANCE, Director, Office of

Personnel Management; BERNADINE HEALY, Doctor,

Dean; EDWARD SONDIK, Doctor, Director NCHS;

PHILIP AMORUSO, Executive Director, National

Cancer Institute; MAXINE RICHARDSON, Equal

Opportunity Manager, National Cancer Institute; SANDRA THOMAS, Equal Employment Opportunity Manager, National Cancer Institute;

MARIANNE WAGNER, Personnel Officer, National

Cancer Institute; BEVERLY LOTT WYATT, Chief,

Research Contracts Branch; DAVID SNIGHT,

Chief, Research Contracts Branch; THOMAS MAYS,

Doctor, Director, National Cancer Institute

OTD; KATHLEEN SYBERT, Doctor, Deputy Director,

National Cancer Institute OTD; DARYL SANDRA

CHAMBLEE, Acting Director, Science Policy and

Technology Transfer; JOHN FOLEY, Former Director, Division of Procurement,

Defendants - Appellees.
3

No. 98-2386

FRANK PAUL LUKACS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES; HAROLD E. VARMUS, Doctor;

RICHARD KLAUSNER, Doctor; NAOMI CHURCHILL,

Director, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, National Institute of Health; DIANE

ARMSTRONG, Former Director, OEO, National

Institute of Health; LINDA MORRIS, Acting

Director, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, National Institute of Health; PHILIP

AMORUSO, Associate Director, National Cancer

Institute; THOMAS MAYS, Doctor, Director,

National Cancer Institute, Office of Technology Development; KATHLEEN SYBERT, Doctor,

Deputy Director, National Cancer Institute,

Office of Technology Development; RUTH

KIRSCHSTEIN, Deputy Director, National Institute of Health; GILBERT F. CASELLAS, Director,

United States Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission; JAMES KING, Director, Office of

Personnel Management; JANET RENO, United

States Attorney General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-379-PJM, CA-97-3359-PJM, CA-97-3495-PJM)

Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999
4

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Paul Lukacs, Appellant Pro Se. George Levi Russell, III,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
5

PER CURIAM:

Frank P. Lukacs appeals the district court’s dismissal of

these civil actions as presenting duplicative claims to two other

of his cases pending before the same district court. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Lukacs v. Shalala, Nos. CA-97-379-PJM; CA-97-

3359-PJM; CA-97-3495-PJM (D. Md. Sept. 4, 1998). We grant Lukacs’

motions to file attachments to his informal brief and deny his

motions to consolidate these appeals with a fourth case. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED