alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Greenplex Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kyle W. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Dated:  April 13, 2011

By: 

/s/ Kyle W. Carlson

 

 

Kyle W. Carlson

 

 

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, Treasurer, Secretary, and Chairman

(Principal Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Horace Leroy MADDOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 16, 1970.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The record, briefs and argument of counsel have been carefully considered, and the cases cited by appellant given proper consideration, but this court is of the opinion, and so holds, that the holding of the 3rd District Court of Appeal of Florida in Hoskins v. State, 208 So.2d 145, is controlling and applicable in this case and therefore the judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT MARSHA AND KENNETH KLEIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Respondents

v. CRAIG ARONCHICK, M.D. & PA. HOSPITAL GASTRO. ASSOCIATES, LTD.; PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioners : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 213 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 13th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000741612
<NAME> TNP ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       642486
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                       3636
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           32107
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        627147
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1305376
<COMMON>                                        100000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       (3245)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             (2782)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   93973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      98269
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            634509
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   248094
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  230531
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1305376
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       280457
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              3140
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      241278
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      244418
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          36039
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 586
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   36625
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         32240
<NET-INCOME>                                      4385
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       3319
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     1066
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          3908
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        29243
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           18201
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,222
<PP&E>                                          15,922
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,444
<SALES>                                         52,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,369
<CGS>                                           14,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    939
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1858 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1858

   To encourage States to permit members of the Armed Forces who are 
    outside of the State under orders to renew a permit to carry a 
      concealed firearm through the mail, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

  Mr. Smith of Missouri (for himself, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Mullin, Mr. 
 Bergman, Mr. Allen, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mr. Budd, 
  Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Keller, Mr. Norman, Mr. McHenry, Mr. 
    Duncan, Mr. Kustoff, Mrs. Lesko, and Mr. Babin) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To encourage States to permit members of the Armed Forces who are 
    outside of the State under orders to renew a permit to carry a 
      concealed firearm through the mail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``U.S. Military Right To Carry Act''.

SEC. 2. CONCEALED CARRY RENEWALS BY MAIL FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES.

    (a) In General.--A State that receives funds under subpart 1 of 
part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 (34 U.S.C. 10151 et seq.) shall have in place--
            (1) a law or policy that permits a member of the Armed 
        Forces who is a resident of the State and who is outside of the 
        State under orders to renew a permit to carry a concealed 
        firearm through the mail; and
            (2) a law or policy that treats a member of the Armed 
        Forces on active duty in the State as a resident of the State 
        for purposes of issuing a permit to carry a concealed firearm 
        in the State.
    (b) Reduction in Funds.--Beginning in the first fiscal year that 
begins after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General 
shall, with respect to the amount that a State would otherwise receive 
under the grant program described in subsection (a)--
            (1) reduce such amount by 5 percent in the case of a State 
        that fails to comply with the requirement under subsection 
        (a)(1); and
            (2) reduce such amount by 5 percent in the case of a State 
        that fails to comply with the requirement under subsection 
        (a)(2).
    (c) Reallocation.--The Attorney General shall reallocate amounts 
not awarded to a State pursuant to subsection (b) to States that comply 
with the requirement under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Registrant) for the annual period ended September 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Golub, as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ David B. GolubName: David B. Golub Title:  Chief Executive Officer Date: November 17, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 CHATHAM LODGING TRUSTDated: March 9, 2011
    /s/ Jeffrey H. FisherJeffrey H. FisherChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Dennis m. cravenDennis M. CravenExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YUN WANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70645

Agency No. A097-359-920

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Yun Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s

(“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

FILED

JUN 02 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70645

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, and de novo

due process claims. Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 2008). We

deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Wang established

extraordinary circumstances to excuse her untimely asylum application. See 8

C.F.R. § 1208.4(a), (5); see also Husyev, 528 F.3d at 1181-82. Accordingly, her

asylum claim fails.

Wang has not “specifically and distinctly argued and raised” the issue of

CAT relief. Castro-Perez v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir. 2005)

(failure to raise a claim results in waiver). Accordingly, her CAT claim fails.

In addition, Wang’s contention that she was denied due process because the

IJ did not act as an impartial fact-finder is not supported by the record. See

Melkonian v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 1061, 1072 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, we

suggest remand to a different IJ.

With respect to withholding of removal, Wang testified she was arrested,

detained for five days, physically abused, forced to sign a confession letter, fired

from her job, prohibited from practicing her Christian religion, and subjected to

ongoing police surveillance. Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s

determination that Wang failed to establish past persecution because the record
3 09-70645

compels a finding of persecution. See Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th

Cir. 2004) (“totality of circumstances” compelled finding of persecution where

Chinese Christian arrested, detained, physically abused, forced to renounce

religion, and fired from job). Wang is therefore entitled to a presumption of a clear

probability of persecution. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)(1)(i). Accordingly, we grant

the petition with respect to withholding of removal and remand for further

proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12,

16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;

REMANDED.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred     |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Charles                N. Eldred         |
|                                  |   | Senior                Vice President and |
|                                  |   | Chief                Financial Officer   |
|                                  |   | PNM                Resources, Inc.       |
1

Filed 9/15/16 P. v. Mendoza CA1/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ANTONIO MENDOZA,

Defendant and Appellant. A145296

(San Mateo County
Super. Ct. No. SC079697A)

Appellant and defendant Antonio Mendoza contends the abstract of judgment

below must be corrected to reflect imposition of a 19

- year prison term, rather than the 29

-

year term currently stated in t he abstract

. The People agree. We direct the trial court to

make the correction.

BACKGROUND

I n December 2014, pursuant to an agreement, appellant pled no contest in two

cases to two counts of assault with a semiautomatic firearm ( Pen

. Code § 245, subd

. (b) ) 1

and one count of soliciting another to commit murder (§ 653f, subd

. (b) )

. He also

admitted personally using a firearm (§ 12022.5, subd

. (a) ) in the two assaults, among

other allegations

. The agreement called for a 19

- year prison term

.

In March 2015, the trial court sentenced appellant to a 19

- year prison term

. The

sentence consisted of a nine

- year term for the assault in count two, plus a 10

- year term

1 All undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.2

for the section 12022.5 enhancement. The court ordered the prison terms on the other

of fenses and allegations to run concurrently.

In June 2015, an abstract of judgment was prepared that states appellant was

sentenced to 29 year s in prison, consisting of the 19

- year term on count two and its

section 12022.5 enhancement, plus ten years for t he section 12022.5 enhancement on

count three.

DISCUSSION

The parties agree the trial court sentenced appellant to a 19

- year term and the 29

-

year term stated in the abstract of judgment is a clerical error. This court has inherent

power to order the corr ection of a clerical error in an abstract of judgment. ( People v.

Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185.) We will do so.

DISPOSITION

Th is matter is remanded to the trial court with directions to correct the abstract of

judgment to reflect imposition of a total prison term of 19 years , consisting of a nine

- year

term on count two and a ten

- year term on the section 12022.5, subdivision (a)

enhancement attached to count two. The trial court shall forward a copy of the amended

abstract of judgment to t he Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In all other

respects, the judgment is affirmed.3 SIMONS, Acting P.J.

We concur.

NEEDHAM, J.

BRUINIERS, J.

(A145296)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Idaho Operations Office; Notice of Intent To Solicit Applications 
for Financial Assistance Grants

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of intent to solicit applications for financial 
assistance grants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy is announcing its intent to 
solicit applications for awards of financial assistance (i.e., grants) 
for state-of-the-art research that contributes to any of the following 
eight areas: reactor physics, reactor engineering, nuclear materials, 
radiological engineering, radioactive waste management, applied 
radiation science, nuclear safety and risk analysis, and innovative 
technologies for next generation reactors, space power and propulsion, 
or radiation sources.

DATES: The anticipated issuance date of Solicitation Number DE-PS07-
98ID13604 is December 1, 1997. A copy of the solicitation in its full 
text may be obtained on the Internet at <a href="http://www.inel.gov/doeid/proc-
div.html">http://www.inel.gov/doeid/proc-
div.html</a> under Current Solicitations. The deadline for receipt of 
applications will be approximately 52 days after issuance of the 
solicitation.

ADDRESSES: Applications will be submitted to: Dallas L. Hoffer, 
Procurement Services Division, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho 
Operations Office, 850 Energy Drive, Mail Stop 1221, Idaho Falls, Idaho 
83401-1563.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dallas Hoffer, Contract Specialist at 
(208) 526-0014 or Brad Bauer, Contracting Officer at (208) 526-0090; 
U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office, 850 Energy Drive, 
Mail Stop 1221, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401-1563.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The solicitation will be issued pursuant to 
10 CFR 600.6(b) Eligibility for awards under this Nuclear Engineering 
Education Research (NEER) Program will be restricted to colleges and 
universities with nuclear engineering degree programs. The purpose of 
the NEER Program is to (1) support basic research in nuclear 
engineering; (2) assist in developing nuclear engineering students; and 
(3) contribute to strengthening the academic community's nuclear 
engineering infrastructure.
    The statutory authority for the program is Pub. L. 95-91.

    Issued in Idaho Falls November 17, 1997.
Michael L. Adams,
Acting Director, Procurement Services Division.
[FR Doc. 97-30796 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Citation Update for

Report to The Congress on

Earnings Stripping, Transfer Pricing and U.S. Income Tax Treaties

Department of the Treasury

November 2007

Page 60 of this report cites a 2007 analysis by McDonald that examines the potential income 

shifting from non-arm’s length transfer pricing.

In fact, this analysis was published in July of 2008 as OTA Technical Paper 2: “Income Shifting 

from Transfer Pricing: Further Evidence from Income Tax Data” by Michael McDonald.

The paper is available at http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/taxanalysis/Documents/OTAtech02.pdf

Office of Tax Analysis

April 10, 2012
#### LUMIDOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY and Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Jimmie Lee CARUTHERS and Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 44777.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.