alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000022698
<NAME>                        COMSAT
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
<CURRENCY>                                      U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         11,205
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               199,356
<PP&E>                                         2,691,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,317,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,814,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,046
<BONDS>                                        451,587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       427,204
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,814,976
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               454,177
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               205,435
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             30,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.27
        



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28372]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Senior Executive Service; Performance Review Board

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Designation of Performance Review Board Chair.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the Performance Review Board Chair 
designee for the Department of Energy.

DATES: This appointment is effective as of September 30, 2010. Susan F. 
Beard.

    Issued in Washington, DC, November 3, 2010.
Sarah J. Bonilla,
Director, Office of Human Capital Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-28372 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
EX-10.3




 Exhibit 10.3 
  





 
 Attention Manuel O. Méndez, Chief Executive Officer 

October 15, 2021 
 Dear Manuel: 

Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement between you and Quotient Limited (the “Company”), dated as of February 23, 2021 and
amended June 7 and October 5, 2021(the “Employment Agreement”). 
 The “Sign-On Equity
Grant” provided by your Employment Agreement in Sections 5(a) and 5(b) of Schedule 1 will be reduced by respectively 181.159 Company restricted stock units and 138.227 Company stock options which will be cancelled in due proportion of the
respective vesting calendars. 
 in lieu thereof the Company shall promptly pay to you in cash in U.S. Dollars 1,000,000 net of social security and tax cost
deductions, to further support your relocation to Switzerland. 
 Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by executing this letter in the space
provided below and emailing it to me. 
 Sincerely, 
  

			
	 /s/ Heino von Prondzynski

	Quotient Limited
		
	By:	 	Heino von Prondzynski
		 	Chairman of the Board
	
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ Manuel O. Méndez

	Manuel O. Méndez

  

			
	 Quotient Limited

Registered in Jersey, Channel Islands, number 109886

Registered office – 28 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey, JE2 3QA, Channel Islands

Correspondence address—PO Box 1075, JTC House, 28 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey, JE4 2QP, Channel Islands
	 	Page 1/1
Checklist Item #36 Application for Approval of a Suspension of 

Benefits Under MPRA

Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund EIN: 51-0161467

Plan No.: 001

Does the application 

include

• the required plan

documents,

• any recent

amendments,

• the summary plan

description (SPD),

• the summary of

material

modifications, and

• the most recent

determination letter.

See section 7.06

The following information is being provided for the 

application on behalf of the Iron Workers Local 17 

Pension Fund:

• Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund

Pension Plan Rules and Regulations

Restated Effective May 1, 2010, including

all amendments(pages IW17PF_371-488);

• Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund

Pension Plan Rules and Regulations

Restated Effective May 1, 2014 as

amended through December 31,

2014(pages IW17PF_489-598);

• Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund

Summary Plan Description Updated

2013(pages IW17PF_599-662);

• IRS Determination Letter Dated October

19, 2012(pages IW17PF_663-665); and

• IRS Acknowledgement Letter Dated March

12, 2015 regarding pending IRS

Determination Letter Request(page

IW17PF_667).

IW17PF_370
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORLANDO MEJIA-ACOSTA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70309

Agency No. A097-740-793

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Orlando Mejia-Acosta, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for

asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

MAR 07 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70309

We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Chebchoub v.

INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir. 2001), and review de novo due process claims,

Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on discrepancies between Mejia-Acosta’s testimony and his asylum

application regarding the nature and circumstances of the threats made against him

and his father. See Chebchoub, 257 F.3d at 1043 (inconsistencies that relate to the

basis for the petitioner’s fear of persecution go to the heart of the claim). In the

absence of credible testimony, Mejia-Acosta’s asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

We reject Mejia-Acosta’s contention that the IJ denied him adequate time to

prepare and present his claims. See Larita-Martinez v. INS, 220 F.3d 1092, 1095

(9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim). 

We also reject his contention that the BIA failed to adequately review the evidence

in his case. See id. at 1095-96 (requiring alien to overcome presumption that BIA

considered all the relevant evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 036 -CR Do ugl as Wa yneSt idha m , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF CALDWELL COUNTY , 421S T JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2007 -28 5 , HO NORAB LE CHARLES R. RAMSAY , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Doug las Way

ne Stidham seeks to appe al a judgment o f co n v i cti on for injury to an elder ly person. The trial court has cer tified that: (1) this is a plea bar g ain ca se and Stidham has no ri ght o f a pp e a l, a nd (2 ) S tid ham w a ive d h is right o f a pp e a l. T he pr o s e no tic e of a pp e a l was a lso untimely . The a

ppeal is dismissed. SeeTex. R. App. P . 25.2(a) (2), ( d), 26.2(a ).

____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________________________ Diane H enson, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Puryear and He nson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Mar ch 6, 2008 Do Not Publish
Exhibit (a)(2)

DWS MONEY MARKET TRUST

AMENDED AND RESTATED DESIGNATION OF SERIES AND CLASSES

OF

SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST 

(with $0.01 par value)

 

WHEREAS, the Trustees of the Trust, acting pursuant to the Trust’s declaration of trust as then in effect, had previously established and designated one or more series of shares of beneficial interest in the Trust (each, a “Series”) pursuant to one or more designations of series (the “Prior Series Designations”) and had previously established and designated one or more classes of Shares (each, a “Class”) for some or all of the Series pursuant to one or more designations of classes (the “Prior Class Designations,” such Prior Series Designations and Prior Class Designations referred to herein collectively as the “Prior Designations”);

 

WHEREAS, the Trustees of the Trust, effective June 2, 2008 restated the Trust’s Prior Designations, the terms of the restated designation to supersede any terms set forth in the Prior Designations;

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article V, Section 11 of the Declaration, the Trustees, at a meeting held on October 1, 2008, authorized the following share class combinations to be effective as of the dates indicated below:

 

(i) Effective as of October 1, 2008, the class of DWS Money Market Series presently designated as Managed Shares is combined with the Institutional Shares class of that Series, and each share of the Managed Shares class of that Series outstanding as of the close of business on October 1, 2008 is reclassified as a share of Institutional Shares class of that Series, to have all the relative rights and preferences of the shares of the Institutional Shares class of that Series under the Declaration;

 

(ii) Effective as of October 1, 2008, the class of DWS Money Market Series presently designated as Premium Class S shares is combined with the Institutional Shares class of that Series, and each Premium Class S share of that Series outstanding as of the close of business on October 1, 2008 is reclassified as a share of Institutional Shares class of that Series, to have all the relative rights and preferences of the shares of the Institutional Shares class of that Series under the Declaration; and

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Gulf War Expert Scientific Advisory Committee, Notice of Charter 
Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.), that the Department of 
Veterans Affairs' Gulf War Expert Scientific Advisory Committee 
(formerly named Persian Gulf Expert Scientific Committee) has been 
renewed for a 2-year period beginning November 10, 1997, through 
November 10, 1999.

    Dated: November 12, 1997.

    By Direction of the Acting Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30401 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0001
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0002
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0003
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0004
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0005
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0006
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0007
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0008
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0009
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0010
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0011
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0012
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0013
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0014
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0015
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0016
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0017
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0018
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0019
File 13 Ex 13 Sensitivity 0020
Re: Boilers -- Major Source and Area sources

Jim 

Eddinger

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Thomas 

Cortney,

As requested, the attached list the major changes being finalized to the boiler rules as compared to the March 2011 

final rules.

(See attached file: One-Pager Describing Major Changes 060712.docx)

Jim

_______________

James A. Eddinger

Energy Strategies Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

919-541-5426

"Higgins, Cortney" ---06/07/2012 01:15:47 PM---Hi Bob and Jim, Can you send a table/list of the major changes to 

the major source and area source r

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/07/2012 01:15 PM

Subject: Boilers -- Major Source and Area sources

Hi Bob and Jim,

Can you send a table/list of the major changes to the major source and area source rules 

compared to the prior final rule? If you have this list with the associated costs and benefits, that 

would be very helpful, but if not, just the list will do. I think you may have generated this for the 

proposed rule, but it’d be good to have it for the final rule.

Regards,

Cortney

One-Pager Describing Major Changes 060712.docx
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this annual report of Advanced Pipe Fitting Technologies, Inc the "Company" on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Guozing Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Guozing LiuGuozing LiuChief  Financial OfficerJanuary 28, 2011
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 21, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137485 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

_________________________________________ Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices IN RE JOSHUA CARLOS GARCIA, Minor, 

_________________________________________/ 

JOSE GARCIA and MARGARET GARCIA,

Petitioners-Appellants, 

v SC: 137485 

 COA: 284876 

Kent CC: 08-022813-AM 

MICHIGAN CHILDREN’S INSTITUTE,

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1118 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 21, 2008 

Clerk
255 La. 910

#### Russell W. CHISHOLM, Sr. v. Douglas STEVENS, Adrienne Stevens and Aetna Insurance Company.

No. 50513.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1970.

In re: Douglas Stevens, Adrienne Stevens and Aetna Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 231 So.2d 640.

Writ refused. The case having been remanded to the trial court, the judgment is not final.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Howard Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC, Sponsor of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Howard MahName:

Title:
Howard Mah

Chief Financial Officer

United States Commodity Funds LLC,

Sponsor of United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
  U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
              SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned, Brian J. Kelley, the Chief Executive
Officer of Cognitronics Corporation (the "Company"), has
executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2006  (the "Report").  The undersigned hereby certifies that:
	(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of
	Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
	of 1934; and
	(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly
	presents, in all material respects, the financial
	condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATED this 15th day of May, 2006


						/s/ Brian J. Kelley
						Brian J. Kelley
						Chief Executive Officer


                                           A signed original of this
                                           written statement required by
                                           Section 906 has been provided
                                           to the Company and will be
                                           retained by the Company and
                                           furnished to the Securities and
                                           Exchange Commission or its
                                           staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6493

RENE FERNANDEZ GARCIA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:13-hc-02182-D)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rene Fernandez Garcia, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rene Fernandez Garcia, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Garcia v. United States, No. 5:13-hc-02182-D (E.D.N.C. 

Mar. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0323 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RANDY VAUGHN SNEED ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 6 2021

12/06/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0323
2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
12-13-2005 

# U SA v . Ji h a d
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 05-1587

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du
. Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" U SA v . Ji h a d " (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 119. h tt p://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/119

### U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O RT H E T H IRD C IR C U IT NO. 05- 1587 UN I TE D S TA TE S O F A ME RI CA

v . RASHI D J I HAD, Appe l l ant Appe a lfr om

Judgm e nt

of Convi c t i on and Se nt e nc e Ent e r e d i n the Di s tr i c t Court for the Di s tr i c t of Ne w J e r s e y

at D. C. No. 04- CR- 00108 Di s tr i c t Judge : The Honor abl e W i l l i am J
. Mart i ni

_______________________________ Pre s e nt : S C IR IC A , C h ie f J u d g e , V A N A N T W E R P E N a n d A L D IS E R T , C i rcui tJudg es.

______________________________________ ORDE R S UR P ET I TI ON F OR P ANE L R EHE ARI NG

______________________________________ T he pet i t i on forpanel r ehea r i ng fi l ed byA ppel l anthavi ng been s ubm i t t ed t o t he j udges w ho par t i ci pat ed i n t he dec i s i on of t hi s C our t , i ti s or der ed t hatt he pet i t i on be and is h e re b yg ra n ted , tha t th e p a n e l o p in io n f iled O c to b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 b e a n d th a t sa m e is her ebyvaca t ed, and t hatan amended notpr ece dent i al opi ni on be pr epar ed and f i l ed, and th a t th e p e titio n f

o r r e h e a ri n g e n b a n c is th e re b yd e n ie d a s m o o t.

BY THE C OU RT: /s/ R u g g e ro J. A ld ise rt C i r cui tJ udge D at ed: D ece m ber 13, 2005 C M D / c c : Jo hn H . Y auc h, Esq. G e or ge S. Leone , Esq. C a r o lin e A . S a d lo w s k i, E s q .