alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jeffrey FLAUM, Appellant, v. Karen FLAUM, Appellee.

No. 73-707.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 8, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 30, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## *Ct»vdUWW) 1 ^^r^(^^F^^^PPBALS 'Xb'VVve-Mor^orAVW- \jiAa.e_ dX Sa?xcA(Loui«A: *r^

cA

## My5^oY| A*£JX3&C(?A) ^JcOiCj^L^^'* ^ CvCwO

bOc^ in 

### ft£^ k A^A* i^ApaA^MvA^Q^aAo\4& *-i>3 . StA vV\ .\Ak) CXe>LCjni n .



## __ _ %„ .._ _oo\^o^°A<^^TWjreyeir(f^lVp^
^0\^C_iaC.Vs, Vc^ do€rCenM,£_4W2*J!^^O^o\-bOrAAr*\r, S^'Y^dL
ejoc^>< 

## ^7\r U^A. ^ •• in \ x £JLA~oto &/oA NAAoAa\^jv\ AiaA?caa\ OoVvCj^t^^^Xon^^c^eA^^ CLWYxo^^^CWjiA UAArs_2&eA\ 0\S\r\(APA^^KoX^rr^iALffixjiKAjt Ci)
Exhibit (k)(1)

 

----
Exhibit 10.1

 


RESTRICED STOCK UNIT AWARD NOTICE







NAME


ADDRESS


ADDRESS







Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), on January 30, 2018, you were granted a restricted stock unit award ("RSU") in the amount of <number awarded> units.  Each RSU is equivalent to one share of common stock upon vesting.







Subject to your continued employment with the Company, your award will vest over four years in accordance with the following schedule:







25% vest on May 8, 2019


25% vest on May 8, 2020


25% vest on May 8, 2021


25% vest on May 8, 2022







Until vested, the units represented by this award are not entitled to receive cash dividends and do not have the right to vote. This award will vest immediately upon a change in control, death or permanent and total disability as defined in Section 2 of the Plan.  Awards not vested at retirement will be forfeited. Please consult the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan Prospectus for a complete understanding of Havertys' equity award program.







This is a summary of the award.  The grant agreement and Plan Prospectus are the authoritative source for all questions on awards made under the Plan.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00548- CV

M&MOrthodontics P.A .; Harlingen Fam ily Dentistry; We stm oreland Dental, P .A.; Westm oreland Dental of Garland, P.C .; West m oreland Dental & Ort hodon tics, P .A.; Scottie H. Nguyen, DDS; and Westm oreland Dental, P .C., LLC, Appellan ts
v. Texas Health and Human Servic es Com m ission ; Dr . Kyle Janek, In His Of fi cial Capacity as the Executive C om m ission er of Texas Health and H um an Services Com m ission ; Carole Hurley, C hief

Adm inis trat ive Law Judge f or the Texas He alth and Human Servic es Com m ission ; Judge Ke ith Gr antham of the Appeals Division Texas Health and Human Service s Com m ission ; and Rick Gilpin , Adm inis trat ive Law Judge of the Appeals Division Texas Health and Human Servic es Com m ission , Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 345 JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 4-0 0110 9, H ONO RAB LE TIM SULAK , JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

Appellants Westmoreland Dental, P.A., Westmoreland Dental of Garl and, P.C., Westmoreland Dental & Orthodontics, P.A., Scottie H. Nguyen, DDS, and Westmorela nd Dental, P.C., L L C (collec tiv e ly , We s tm o r e la n d) h a v e f il e d an unopposed motion reque sting that their appea ls be dismiss ed. We g rant the motion and dismiss Westmoreland’s appea l. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a) (1). We further amend the style of the case , as follows, to corr ectly ref lect the rema ining parties to the a

ppeal:M& M Orthodontics P.A. and Harlingen Family D entistry, Appellants

v. Texas He alth and Human Servic es Commission; Dr. Kyle J anek, I n His Official Capacity as the Exe cutive Comm issioner of T exas H ealth and Human Serv ices Commission; Carole Hurley, Chief Administrat ive Law Judge for the Tex as Health and Human Se rvice s Commission; Judge Ke ith Grantham of the Appeals Division Texas Health and Human Se rvice s Commission; and Rick G ilpin, Administrative Law Judge of the Appe als Division Texas Health and Human Servic es Commission, Appellees

It is ordere d this October 16, 2014.

Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in

2
|                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |  |  |
| SUBSIDIARIES OF GOLUB CAPITAL BDC, INC.              |
|                                                 |   |   |
| Name                                                 |   | Jurisdiction |
| Golub Capital BDC 2010-1 Holdings LLC                |   | Delaware |
| Golub Capital BDC 2010-1 LLC                         |   | Delaware |
| Golub Capital BDC CLO 2014 LLC                       |   | Delaware |
| Golub Capital BDC CLO III LLC                        |   | Delaware |
| Golub Capital BDC CLO III Depositor LLC              |   | Delaware |
| GBDC Quick Quack Coinvest LLC                        |   | Delaware |
| Golub Capital BDC Funding LLC                        |   | Delaware |
| Golub Capital BDC Funding II LLC                     |   | Delaware |
| Golub Capital BDC Holdings LLC                       |   | Delaware |
| Golub Capital Investment Corporation CLO 2016(M) LLC |   | Delaware |
| GCIC Quick Quack Coinvest LLC                        |   | Delaware |
| GCIC CLO II LLC                                      |   | Delaware |
| GCIC CLO II Depositor LLC                            |   | Delaware |
| GCIC Funding LLC                                     |   | Delaware |
| GCIC Funding II LLC                                  |   | Delaware |
| GCIC Holdings LLC                                    |   | Delaware |
| GC SBIC IV-GP, LLC                                   |   | Delaware |
| GC SBIC IV, L.P.                                     |   | Delaware |
| GC SBIC V-GP, LLC                                    |   | Delaware |
| GC SBIC V, L.P.                                      |   | Delaware |
| GC SBIC VI-GP, LLC                                   |   | Delaware |
| GC SBIC VI, L.P.                                     |   | Delaware |
| Mountain Open LLC                                    |   | Delaware |
| Mountain Open 2 LLC                                  |   | Delaware |
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS D IVISION O NE

S TATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

D ENNIS PAUL EDDY , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA- CR 17-0488 PRPC

P etition for Review from the Superior Court in Coconino County No. CR1985-11929 The Honorable Mark R. Moran , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL
Coconino C ounty Attorney’s Office, Flagstaff By William P. Ring Counsel for Respondent

D ennis Paul Eddy, Buckeye Petitioner

M EMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Jon W. Thompson, Judge Peter B. Swann , and Judge James P. Beene delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 2-20-2018STATE v. EDDY Decision of the Court

2 P E R C U R I A M : ¶1 Petitioner Dennis Paul Eddy seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1

. This is the petitioner’s latest
su cc essive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 576 -77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the petition. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find t hat petitioner has not shown an abuse of discretion. ¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny relief.
OFFlCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN** Xay 25, 1939 HonorableT. P. Walker, Auditor Departmentof Education Austin, Texas Dear Sir:

we are in rroel wherein you nqgest our iag question:

Wherein an eleot

**airied** rot023 or ammoa eohool dispeadeat @ho01 dlaror the conreridrtlon or suOh ohool purpoeee, the County County Judge shell give notiee of the date of suoh electionsby publioatlons or the order In eonm newspaperpublished ia the county for twenty (20) days prior to the date on which such elections are ordered, or by posting a notioe of euoh eleetione in saoh orHonorableT. E. ealker,My 25, 1939, page 2 the districts,or by both such publication and posted notices
. . . "C~LUQ~~

school districts

may in like manner be consolidated with contiguouslndependent school districts,and thedistrict so created shall be known by the nane of the independentschool districtIncluded therein, and the mnageffient of the new districtshall be under the existingboard of trusteesof the independent

sohool district,and all the rights and privileges granted to independent distrlatsby,

the lam oi,th$s State #hall he given to the aonsolldato~:i0&pen6ont~6lstriat areated un&ew3&e.~j)Mrr?Ltiexm or t&l@ law; . . . . prodded furpi&! 

### that whim it Su proposedto consolldate~i$&~oue comtT~'l%e districtsthe preeoribedin :.' .~.I “$; i

We have no et&ate requiring that aajr..pcirt~. period or time ahall-interveaa between +ay 6uoh:eleFc Article ,2806

**provldea.~ior** the iesuanee ot cle

. upon. the present+tlon **of petlti+qneJ**  **-signal .by**  majority or the 1egal.l.r qualS%e&we+ersiot 0 teresteddlatriots. wben.auoh~titiens'as greperfir::~mseated, such eleatlonsmay be !%U.ed~uH+ottt reiexe&iei'te the lath or time that has pasaad31ino~ a prev+a s-ax? eleotl63i. .~. , **.Yourt3 very**  **truly**

**Assistant**

TEXAS APPROVED OPINION.COLZIT!lXE N Rm Ch%lrlWUI
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     3,052
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,052
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,716
<OTHER-SE>                                         336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Edmund Glenn SHOWER, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Paul ZAAGMAN et al., Appellees.

No. 71-494.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 16, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 4.2

 



VCTR   INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR   CERTAIN DEFINITIONS FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE CLASS B COMMON SHARES,   $0.01 PAR VALUE, OF VICTORY CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. transferable on the books   of the Corporation byCthe hOolder Mhereof iMn persoOn or bNy Attorney upon   surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not   valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be   signed by facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated:   CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT TREASURER OR SECRETARY   COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY   (Brooklyn, New York) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE   THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of CUSIP 000000 00 0 


    




 






 



THE BOARD OF   THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE   RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER   THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON   WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE,   A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE   RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL   STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE   RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED   TO BE ISSUED. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on   the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written   out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: UTMA – Custodian TEN   COM TEN ENT JT TEN – as tenants in common – as tenants by entireties – as   joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common (Cust)   (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional   abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value   received hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY   OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND   ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock   represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute   and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the   within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.   Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME   AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT   ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL   GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER)   WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM   (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM   (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE   DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Florida Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Florida Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 2:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 17, 1997, at the 
Hotel Inter-Continental, 100 Chopin Plaza, Miami, Florida 33131. The 
purpose of the meeting is to discuss new project ideas, and new member 
orientation.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the 
Southern Regional Office, 404-562-7000 (TDD 404-562-7004). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, November 18, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-30694 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.B
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004 of El Paso CGP Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
D. Dwight Scott, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify
(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ D. Dwight Scott
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              D. Dwight Scott
                                              Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

                                              November 5, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Soap Salts Registration Review Focus Meeting with the Soap Salts Task Force

Meeting Summary

Wednesday, May 8, 2013; 2 – 3 pm (Eastern time); S‐9100

EPA Attendees:

Pesticide Re‐evaluation Division:  Monica Wait, Tracy Perry

Environmental Fate and Effects Division:  Bill Eckel, Stephen Carey, Mark Corbin

Registration Division:  Gene Benbow

Soap Salts Task Force (TF) Attendees:

Chad Mateer, Mark Mongiovi (Woodstream)

David Lewis (Lewis and Harrison, representing Scotts)

Fred Obenchain (Pathway)

Nina Wilson (Gowan), phone

Eliot Harrison (Lewis and Harrison, TF Manager)

Jim Yowell (Agro‐K), phone

Discussion Topics:

 EPA provided an overview of the next steps in the registration review process for soap

salts following the close of the 60‐day public comment period on the preliminary risk

assessments on May 20, 2013.

 EPA provided an overview of the soap salts preliminary ecological risk assessment and

background on how the endangered species assessments will be conducted.  EPA

highlighted places in the existing ecological risk assessment where there are

uncertainties with regard to soap salts products that lead to conservative assumptions.  

The uncertainties may be able to be refined with additional soap salts product

information and/or clearer product labels resulting in lower risk estimates or

conclusions of no risk.

 The soap salts task force registrants provided an overview of some of their products,

most of which are used in the residential market only.  Woodstream provided a table for

all of their active Section 3 registrations which included useful information including

application rate, the % of an acre covered if the entire container of product is used,

treatment type, and chemical composition.  In general, the task force registrants believe

most of their products are within the lower range of application rates (less than 25

pounds active ingredient per acre) assessed by EFED.

 The soap salts task force provided some other comments on the preliminary ecological

risk assessment such as on the acute daphnia study which was used.
 EPA stated that usage data could help to further refine the risk assessment by

characterizing the extent and geographical distribution of soap salts use.

 The task force agreed to compile a package of product information, as discussed, and

any other comments on the risk assessment and submit it to the soap salts registration

review docket.  EPA will consider and incorporate this information when preparing the

final ecological risk assessment for registration review.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                          28,675
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,288
<INVENTORY>                                     72,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,759
<PP&E>                                         279,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                 132,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 434,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,865
<BONDS>                                         71,262
<COMMON>                                        15,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     24,465
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   434,776
<SALES>                                        147,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,966
<CGS>                                          105,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,799
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,253
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO



SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002.



I, Sergio Agapito Lires Rial, Chief Executive
Officer of Banco Santander (Brasil), S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.       the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Banco Santander (Brasil), S.A.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 28, 2017



| | By: | /s/ Sergio Agapito Lires Rial
| | --- | -----------------------------
| |     | Name:                        
| |     | Title: