alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sam JONES, in proper person, Appellant, v. Hans G. TANZLER, Jr., as Mayor, et al., Appellees.

No. M-499.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 23, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1970.

Sam Jones, in pro per.

William L. Durden, Special Counsel, and David U. Tumin, Asst. Counsel, and Bass-ford, Levy & Howell, Jacksonville, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

This matter has been carefully considered by this court, with due regard to the public importance thereof inasmuch as an alleged violation of F.S. Section 286.011(1), F.S.A., is involved. We have compared the alleged facts in this case with the alleged facts contained in the Florida Supreme Court case of Board of Public Instruction of Broward County v. Doran, 224 So.2d 693 (1969) and we do not find that the order of the trial court dismissing the last amended complaint without leave to further amend is in conflict with said Doran case, supra. Neither do we find any other error in the order appealed from.

Said order is therefore affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial
Commercial Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Bernard Korn
    ----------------


Name: Bernard Korn
      ------------
      Chief Executive Officer


November 15, 2004
Exhibit 10.28

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

 

This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of June 15, 2017, is entered into by and between FTS International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Lance Turner, a resident of Texas (“Executive”).

 

RECITALS:

 

A.                                    The Company and Executive previously entered into that certain Severance Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2016 (the “Agreement”); and

 

B.                                    The Agreement has a Term of one (1) year and the Company desires to extend the Term for an additional one (1) year period.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows:

 

1.                                      Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.

 

2.                                      Amendment.  Section 1 of the Agreement is replaced in its entirety to read as follows:

 

1.                                              Severance Agreement Term.  The term of this Agreement will be for a period of two (2) years (the “Term”), commencing on the Effective Date.

 

3.                                      Other. Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms, provisions, and covenants contained in the Agreement are in all respects hereby ratified and confirmed in their entirety. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement not expressly amended hereby remain in full force and effect. Should there be any discrepancy between the terms of the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control.

 

4.                                      Governing Law and Venue.  This Amendment shall be construed under and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof. The sole and exclusive venue for any dispute arising from this Amendment shall be the state or federal courts of Tarrant County, Texas.

 

5.                                      Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and shall have the same effect as if the signatures hereto and thereto were on the same instrument.

 

[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
FTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Karen Thornton
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Karen Thornton
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   CAO
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
EXECUTIVE
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Lance Turner
    
	
 
    	
Lance Turner
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Fred Kenneth ROBINSON, Respondent.

No. 42958.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 21, 1972.

ERVIN, CARLTON, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, J., dissent.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC  20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

[ X ] 		**QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
			OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
For the quarterly period ended:  January 31, 2003**OR**
[    ] 		**TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
			OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
For the transition period from _________ to ___________

Commission file number     0-12619
                                                     Collins Industries, Inc.                                                              .
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

               Missouri               		                                         43-0985160                                .
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)				           (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

             15 Compound Drive                      Hutchinson, Kansas             67502-4349                   .
                    (Address of principal executive offices)						   (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number including area code	                            620-663-5551                                          .
 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

 

					     Yes  X .	No .
 

 

Indicate by check mark wither the registrant is an accelerated Filer (as defined under rule 12-b of the Act). Yes ___   No x .
 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

 

 

Common Stock, $.10 par value						      7,077,329          .
		Class						         Outstanding at February 27, 2003**COLLINS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

January 31, 2003

INDEX**
#### PARK TOWERS ASSOCIATES, INC. v. OVERSTREET.

No. 38352.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 72 (Monday, April 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 22225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08780]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 72 / Monday, April 15, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 22225]]

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

Board of Directors Executive Session Meeting

Meeting: African Development Foundation, Board of Directors 
Executive Session Meeting

    Time: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:15 a.m. to 2:15 p.m.
    Place: 1400 Eye Street NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005
    Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2013
    Status:

1. Open session, Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 11:15 a.m. to 12:10 p.m. 1:15 
p.m. to 2:15 p.m.
2. Closed session, Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 12:15 p.m. to 1:10 p.m.

    Please contact Michele Rivard, Chief of Staff, by 5:00 p.m. on 
Friday, April 19 if you plan to attend the open session.

Doris Mason Martin,
General Counsel, USADF.
[FR Doc. 2013-08780 Filed 4-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
| 1.     | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China New Greenfood Company Ltd. |

| By:                | /s/ Taiping Zhou                                                          |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Taiping ZhouChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
#### Victor D. HOLLANDER, Appellant, v. NOLAN BROWN MOTORS, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-316.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

*10Philip F. Ludovici, Miami, for appellant.

Daniel V. Ligman, Coral Gables, for ap-pellee.

Before CPIARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the defendant Nolan Brown Motors, Inc., directed at the close of the plaintiff’s case.

Plaintiff delivered his automobile to the defendant at its place of business, to have the wheels aligned and for lubrication. Some time that day, while the vehicle was stored on defendant’s business premises, either before or after the repair and servicing (the record not revealing which) the car was removed or stolen therefrom by a person or persons unknown. This action was by the plaintiff to recover the value of the vehicle.

The appellant has not supplied a record of the trial proceedings, other than four pages which reveal presentation and argument of the motion of the defendant for directed verdict and the colloquy of counsel and the court thereon.

The appellant contends that the granting of the directed verdict by the court was error in that it was based on an incorrect application of law. The portion of the record submitted reveals the trial court, on considering the motion for directed verdict, stated “unless you can both make or show a standard of care in a community, you have not shown the standard of care required. You could have brought in from outside Nolan Brown and established a standard within the community of dealers.”

Without necessity to decide whether the trial court proceeded on an inapplicable rule of law, if the judgment is sustainable on other grounds it should be affirmed. Jaffe v. Endure-A-Life Time Awning Sales, Inc., Fla. 1957, 98 So.2d 77; In re Estate of Yohn, Fla. 1970, 238 So.2d 290.

The defendant was a bailee of plaintiff’s automobile. The test of liability of a bailee for entrusted goods which are lost or stolen is whether the bailee exercised that degree of care toward the goods that a reasonably prudent person would bestow on his own goods. 4 Fla.Jur., Bailments, § 9; 15 Fla.Jur., Garages, Filling and Parking Station, and Liveries, § 18.

In the absence of a record revealing the evidence presented by and on *11behalf of the plaintiff, we cannot determine whether a sufficient showing was made by plaintiff to make a prima facie case under the applicable law, and the appellant is not in position to demonstrate error in the challenged ruling of the trial court, which comes here with a presumption of correctness. See Broward County Port Authority for Use and Benefit of Cappelen v. F. M. Rule & Company, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 82; Gilson v. Murphy, Fearnley & Yawn, Inc., Fla.App. 1963, 151 So.2d 447; Latin American Benefit Center, Inc. v. Johnstoneaux, Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 86.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-87-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

November 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 12, 1997, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, West 
Virginia 25314-1599, filed in Docket No. CP98-87-000 a request pursuant 
to Sections 157.205 and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under 
the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.216) for authorization to 
abandon by retirement approximately 1.1 miles of 8-inch pipeline 
located in Hancock County, West Virginia, under Columbia's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Columbia proposes to abandon a section of lateral transmission Line 
306 consisting of approximately 1.1 miles of 8-inch pipeline and 
appurtenances in Hancock County. Columbia was authorized to own and 
operate the facilities proposed for abandonment in Docket No. CP71-132 
and Columbia has stated that there are no points of delivery from this 
Line 306 section. According to Columbia, the Line 306 section for which 
abandonment authority is requested is an uncoated, low pressure 
pipeline in need of replacement and cathodic protection due to its 
deteriorating condition. The proposed abandonment will avoid both 
annual operation and maintenance expenses as well as the costs of 
future pipeline replacement. Columbia states that these predictable and 
certain savings make the abandonment of this section of Line 306 the 
most practical and least costly alternative to Columbia without 
impacting Columbia's ability to render service.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31001 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 accompanying this certification
and filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Geoffrey F. Feidelberg,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 15, 2007

                                       /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                       --------------------------
                                       Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                       Chief Financial Officer



                                       43
#### GENERAL CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. TEL SERVICE CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, G. E. Grass and Richard A. Noll, Appellees.

No. 70-808.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 10, 1971.

Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

William B. Holland, Winter Haven, E. A. Bosarge, Bartow, and Henry M. Sinclair and Norman A. Sand of Sinclair & Louis, Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed is affirmed in all respects with the exception that the judgment creditor should be Tel Service Co., Inc. instead of G. E. Grass and Richard A. Noll. This cause is remanded for the sole purpose of substituting Tel Service Co., Inc. as the judgment creditor in the place and stead of G. E. Grass and Richard A. Noll.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
# ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA# 04-14-00004-CR POSS CHILD OFFENSE: PORNOGRAPHY DEVIN ALEXANDER KANE V. 

## STYLE: the stateoftexas COUNTY: KERR COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED 

### TRIAL COURT: 216TM DISTRICT COURT DATE: 02/11/15 Publish: YES TCCASE#: A1319



## IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD DEVIN ALEXANDER KANE V. STYLE: THE STATE OF TEXAS 

# cca# ui'/V 3AV-/5* APPBLL^tfT^5 Petition CCADisposition: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEWIN CCA IS: 

# DATE: /Tly, ZO. 2.o/£- JUDGE: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR
AMENDMENT
TO EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


AMENDMENT
(this “Amendment”), dated as of January 5, 2018, to that certain Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 14,
2017 (as amended from time to time, the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among The Players Network, a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) and Kodiak Capital Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Investor”).


 


W
I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS,
the Company has requested that Investor amend the definition of “Minimum Purchase Price” under the Purchase Agreement,
and Investor is willing to do so.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Defined Terms.


 


All
capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Purchase Agreement.


 


2.
Amendment to the Purchase Agreement.


 


The
definition of ““Minimum Purchase Price” as set forth in Section 1.1 of the Purchase Agreement is hereby
amended and restated as follows:


 


“Minimum
Purchase Price” shall mean $0.14.


 


3.
General.


 


(a)
No Other Amendments; Confirmation. Except as expressly amended, modified and supplemented hereby, the provisions of the Purchase
Agreement and the other Transaction Documents are and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


(b)
Governing Law; Counterparts. This Amendment and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by, and construed
and interpreted in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Nevada. This Amendment may be executed by one or more of
the parties hereto on any number of separate counterparts (including by facsimile transmission), and all of said counterparts
taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.


 




    	 	 	 



     


    


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by their respective proper and duly
authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	THE
    PLAYERS NETWORK
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:
    	Mark
    Bradley
	 	Title:
    	Chief
    Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	KODIAK
    CAPITAL GROUP, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:
    	Ryan
    Hodson
	 	Title:
    	Managing
    Member


 




    	 	2
SWORCCPP-000171
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


February 1, 2018


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 364 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on January 31, 2018, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-221854) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO_______________


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President