alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dennis MAHER v. Mrs. Pauline ALONSO, wife of and Antonio Alonso, Nola Cabs, Inc., and St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

No. 3463.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Fourth Circuit.

May 5, 1969.

*563George J. Kambur, Robert J. Stamps, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert J. Pitard, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

Before YARRUT, SAMUEL and CHAS-EZ, JJ.

YARRUT, Judge.

This appeal concerns a $60,966.15 damage claim arising from a collision between two taxicabs in the privately owned parking lot of the Fairgrounds Race Track in the City of New Orleans. The Trial Judge dismissed Plaintiff’s suit on a finding he failed to prove the accident was caused by the Defendant-driver’s negligence.

The only witness to the accident to testify was the Defendant-driver. This is his version:

On January 14, 1966, after entering the race track parking lot, he drove in a direction that paralleled the building. His course took him past a row-of cars, parked perpendicular to and adjacent to the outside wall of the grandstand. The parked vehicles were to his immediate right. As he approached the back of Plaintiff’s taxicab, he observed it was stopped in the parking area and there was adequate space between Plaintiff’s vehicle and the row of parked cars to permit his passing Plaintiff on the right. While he was passing, the right rear door of Plaintiff’s taxicab was flung open by a passenger attempting to disembark and the door struck his taxicab. He stated his vehicle was not damaged.

Plaintiff’s testimony is pure conjecture as to how the accident occurred. He admitted he did not see the collision. At the time, he was turning off his ignition and shifting to reverse gear to prevent his taxicab from rolling. He explained this was the standard procedure he followed before opening the door to discharge passengers. The only other factual evidence Plaintiff attempted to adduce was the- condition of the right rear door after the collision, but the man who made the estimate could not recall where the door was damaged. He could only identify an estimate to replace Plaintiff’s right rear door as one made by him.

Based on the foregoing evidence, we conclude the Trial Court properly dismissed this suit because Plaintiff failed to prove Defendant was guilty of any act of negligence whatsoever. It is a well established principle of our jurisprudence that a plaintiff must prove his claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Newsom v. Temple, La.App., 66 So.2d 357.

For the reasons assigned, the judgbient appealed from is affirmed. Plaintiff is to pay all costs in both courts.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5921-8]


Announcement and Notice of Availability of an Addendum to the 
``Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy'' Issued on December 5, 1984

SUMMARY: This memorandum is an addendum to the ``Interim CERCLA 
Settlement Policy'' which was issued by the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on 
December 5, 1984 (50 FR 5024, February 5, 1985). That policy sets forth 
the general principles governing settlements with potentially 
responsible parties under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). On June 3, 1996, EPA issued 
an ``Interim Guidance on Orphan Share Compensation for Settlors of 
Remedial Design/Remedial Action and Non-Time-Critical Removals.'' 
Because that guidance document does not apply to CERCLA cost recovery 
settlements in which the parties are not agreeing to perform remedial 
design/remedial action work or a non-time critical removal, EPA and DOJ 
are issuing the addendum to provide the Regions with direction for 
addressing potential compromises of CERCLA cost recovery claims due to 
the existence of a significant orphan share.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Bulatao (202-564-6028) or Deniz 
Ergener (202-564-4233), Office of Site Remediation Enforcement, 401 M 
St., SW, 2273A, Washington, D.C. 20460 or Bob Brook in the 
Environmental Enforcement Section of the Department of Justice at (202) 
514-2738. This addendum is available electronically at <a href="http://
www.epa.gov/envirosense/oeca/osre/osredoc.html">http://
www.epa.gov/envirosense/oeca/osre/osredoc.html</a>. Copies of this document 
can be ordered from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 
22161. Each order must reference the NTIS item number, PB98-103138. For 
telephone orders or further information on placing an order, call NTIS 
at (703) 487-4650 or (800) 553-NTIS. For orders via E-mail/Internet, 
send to the following address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#553a2731302726153b213c267b333031223a2739317b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a65786e6f78794a647e6379246c6f6e7d6578666e246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
Steven A. Herman,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 
Environmental Protection Agency.
[FR Doc. 97-30012 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement on the General Management Plan for Little River Canyon 
National Preserve, Alabama

SUMMARY: The National Park Service will prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) to accompany its General Management Plan (GMP) for 
Little River Canyon National Preserve. The Service invites suggestions 
for issues to be considered and ideas for resolving the issues.

DATES: Scoping suggestions should be submitted on or before January 1, 
1998 to ensure adequate consideration by the Service.

ADDRESSES: Superintendent, Little River Canyon National Preserve, P.O. 
Box 45, Fort Payne, Alabama 35967, Telephone: (205) 997-9239.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1995, the National Park Service began the 
preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the GMP.
    This included scoping for the EA. The National Park Service has 
announced that an EIS on GMPs will be prepared for all park units. To 
comply with this policy, a formal scoping period is announced.
    Comments are invited on any issue believed to be relevant to 
Preserve management and should be submitted to the Superintendent whose 
address is given above. No public scoping meeting will be held. We urge 
that comments be made in writing. Issues may be suggested for the 
Service to consider during its planning as well as suggestions for 
resolution. Issues currently being considered include the preservation 
of water quality and quantity, the preservation and management of the 
Preserve's natural features and cultural resources, identification of 
resource compatible recreational pursuits, and infrastructure needs. 
Central to these issues is the determination of the Preserve's 
mission--its purpose and significance. The plan will identify desired 
conditions for resources and visitor experiences for various management 
units within the Preserve. A draft GMP/EIS will be prepared and 
presented to the public for review and comment followed by preparation 
and availability of the final GMP/EIS.

    Dated: November 5, 1997.
Daniel W. Brown,
Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 97-30800 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the As Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Helene Simonet, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Coherent, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 2, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coherent, Inc.

 
| Date:   May 11,   2011             |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/:   HELENE SIMONET                                  |   |
| Helene   Simonet                                       |   |
| Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          27,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,724
<INVENTORY>                                     58,129
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,403
<PP&E>                                         196,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,223
<BONDS>                                         93,415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     24,172
<COMMON>                                        13,560
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,116
<SALES>                                        465,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               465,209
<CGS>                                          340,993
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  340,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   850
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,356
<DISCONTINUED>                                   6,083
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,044)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-163715) pertaining to 2007 Share Incentive Plan and 2008 Share Incentive Plan of China Nuokang Bio-Pharmaceutical Inc. of our report dated June 3, 2011, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of China Nuokang Bio-Pharmaceutical Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming

Shanghai, The Peoples Republic of China

June 3, 2011
#### HARRISON-WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION, INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. Leon E. IRGANG and Evelyn Irgang, Appellees.

No. U-50.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 15, 1973.

John F. Fannin, Milam, Martin & Ade, and Datz, Jacobson & Dusek, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Delbridge L. Gibbs, Marks, Gray, Con-roy & Gibbs, and Maurice W. Goldstein, Goldstein & Goldstein, Jacksonville, for ap-pellees.

*61PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed on authority of Surf Properties v. Markowitz Bros., 75 So.2d 298 (Fla.1954).

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., JOHNSON, J, and YAWN, THERON A., Associate Judge, concur.
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Maurekus Markell Grigsby , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00137

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 29062 ).

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Stevens

, Justice van Cleef and

Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the a ppeal.

We note that the appellant, Maurekus Markell Grigsby , has adequately indicated his

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 18, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: ADVANCED MEDIA NETWORKS, LLC, Appellant

______________________

2019

- 1766

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/013,382.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

S ETH O STROW

, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by A NTONIO
P APAGEORGIOU , Lombard & Geliebter LLP , New York, NY

.

W ILLIAM L A M ARCA

, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by

T HOMAS W. K RAUSE

, F RANCES L YNCH

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED : Case: 19-1766 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 11/06/2020P ER C URIAM (D YK

, T ARANTO

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 6, 2020

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 19-1766 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 11/06/2020
No. 9841.

#### Erie Railroad Co. *v.*Vincent.

(Decided October 9, 1906.)

Error to' Circuit Court of Mahoning County.

*Messrs. Hine, Kennedy &*Robinson, for- plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. N. Anderson*and *Mr. Frank Jacobs,*for defendant in error.

Judgment of the circuit court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            MEIGUO ACQUISITION CORP.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Meiguo   Acquisition   Corp.
("Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
W. Keaveney,  Chief Executive Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: March 21, 2011                /s/ David W. Keaveney
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                By:  David W. Keaveney
                                Its: President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                     Chief Financial Officer and Director
                                     (Principal Executive Officer and
                                     Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### IBI SECURITY SERVICE OF FLORIDA, INC. and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. George E. COOPER and Ruth I. Cooper, Respondents.

No. 44383.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 27, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 281 So.2d 524.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTSMEN
LOCAL No. 7 PENSION PLAN

33 FiTcH BOULEVARD
AUSTINTOWN, OHIO 44515
PHONE: 330/270-0453
TOLL FREE: 800/435-2388

August 12, 2021

The Honorable Janet Yellen
U.S. Secretary of the Treasury
U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC. 20220

Re: Withdrawal of Application for Suspension of Benefits under the Roofers Local
No. 88 Pension Plan

Dear Secretary Yellen:

As an authorized trustee of the Board of Trustees of the Roofers Local No. 88 Pension Plan (the
“Pension Plan”), the plan sponsor of the Pension Plan, I respectfully withdraw the application filed
December 15, 2020 for suspension of benefits pursuant to Section 432(e)(9) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”),and the parallel language in Section 305(e)(9)
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”).

Respectfully submitted,
ile D e132
Martin Date

Authorized Trustee
Roofers Local No. 88 Pension Plan
Order entered June 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00230-CV

GREAT AMERICAN LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Appellants

V.

VINES-HERRIN CUSTOM HOMES L.L.C., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-03-6903

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ June 17, 2015 unopposed second motion for an extension 

of time to file a brief seeking an extension to August 24, 2015. In an order dated June 17, 2015, 

this Court granted appellees’ June 11, 2015 motion and extended the time to file their brief to 

August 24, 2015. Accordingly, we DENY appellees’ motion as moot.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 26755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10939]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9669-6]

Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption--Class I Hazardous Waste 
Injection; Diamond Shamrock Refining Company, LP, Sunray, TX

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition 
reissuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to 
the land disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid 
Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has 
been granted to Diamond Shamrock for three Class I injection wells 
located at Sunray, Texas. The company has adequately demonstrated to 
the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency by the petition 
reissuance application and supporting documentation that, to a 
reasonable degree of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous 
constituents from the injection zone for as long as the waste remains 
hazardous. This final decision allows the continued underground 
injection by Diamond Shamrock, of the specific restricted hazardous 
wastes identified in this exemption, into Class I hazardous waste 
injection wells WDW-102, WDW-192, and WDW-332 at the Sunray, Texas 
facility until December 31, 2025, unless EPA moves to terminate this 
exemption. Additional conditions included in this final decision may be 
reviewed by contacting the Region 6 Ground Water/UIC Section. A public 
notice was issued February 27, 2012. The public comment period closed 
on April 12, 2012. No comments were received. This decision constitutes 
final Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal. This 
decision may be reviewed/appealed in compliance with the Administrative 
Procedure Act.

DATES: This action was effective as of April 18, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition and all pertinent information 
relating thereto are on file at the following location: Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection Division, Source 
Water Protection Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: April 26, 2012.
William K. Honker,
Acting Director, Water Quality Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-10939 Filed 5-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
# 2018 Income by Source
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald G. Bauer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K/A
of Secure Luggage Solutions, Inc;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|                   | By: | /s/Donald G. Bauer                      
|------------------ | --- | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2011 |     | Donald G. Bauer                         
|                   |     | President, Chief Executive
      Officer

---