alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.8


CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








I, Mark Saxon, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Tasman Metals Ltd.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: December 28, 2011





/s/ Mark Saxon


Mark Saxon


President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

12-13-2005

USA v. Jihad

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-1587

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Jihad" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 119.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/119
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 05-1587

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

RASHID JIHAD, Appellant

Appeal from Judgment of Conviction and Sentence Entered in the District Court for the

District of New Jersey at D.C. No. 04-CR-00108

District Judge: The Honorable William J. Martini

_______________________________

Present: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, VAN ANTWERPEN and ALDISERT, 

Circuit Judges.

______________________________________

ORDER SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

______________________________________

The petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellant having been submitted to the

judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is ordered that the petition be and

is hereby granted, that the panel opinion filed October 25, 2005 be and that same is

hereby vacated, and that an amended not precedential opinion be prepared and filed, and

that the petition for rehearing en banc is thereby denied as moot. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Ruggero J. Aldisert 

Circuit Judge

Dated: December 13, 2005

CMD/cc: John H. Yauch, Esq.

 George S. Leone, Esq.

 Caroline A. Sadlowski, Esq.
Page 37.1.41
 

Page 37.1.42
Page 37.1.43











ALAMEDA COUNTY INDUSTRIES 

Page 37.1.55
 

Page 37.1.56

 

 
Page 37.1.57
Page 37.1.58

ALBANY FORD SUBARU 

Page 37.1.60

Page 37.1.62
Page 37.1.63
Page 37.1.64

Page 37.1.66
#### Morris JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2527.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62362-62363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30592]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; President's Committee on the 
Arts and the Humanities: Meeting XLI

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities will be 
held on December 5, 1997 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. This meeting will 
convene to discuss the recommendations made in Creative America, a 
Report to the President on the system of support for arts and culture 
in the United States today and to consider specific measures in 
California for increasing support for the arts and the humanities. The 
meeting will be held in the Schwab Room of the San Francisco Museum of 
Modern Art, 151 Third Street, San Francisco, California.
    At 9:00 a.m. the Committee meeting will begin with a welcome from 
Mayor Willie Brown, followed by opening remarks from Dr. John Brademas, 
Chairman. Executive Director Harriet Fulbright will give a Director's 
update, and the meeting will conclude with reports by individual 
members of the committee. The meeting will adjourn at 12:00 p.m.
    The President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities was 
created by Executive Order in 1982 to advise the President, the two 
Endowments, and the Institute of Museum and Library Services on 
measures to encourage private sector support for the nation's cultural 
institutions and to promote public understanding of the arts and the 
humanities.
    If, in the course of discussion, it becomes necessary for the 
Committee to discuss non-public commercial or financial information of 
intrinsic value, the Committee will go into closed session pursuant to 
subsection (c)(4) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
    Any interested persons may attend as observers, on a space 
available basis, but seating is limited in meeting rooms and staff of 
the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art will need to know who will be 
attending. Therefore, for this meeting, individuals wishing to attend

[[Page 62363]]

are required to notify the staff of the President's Committee in 
advance at (202) 682-5409 or write to the Committee at 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 526, Washington, DC 20506.

    Dated: November 17, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-30592 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
#### In the Matter of Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Town Board of Town of Riverhead et al., Respondents.

[736 NYS2d 87]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Riverhead, dated February 1, 2000, granting a zoning change and site approval for the development of property in Baiting Hollow, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered November 6, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and the determination is annulled.

We agree with the petitioners’ contention that, under the circumstances presented here, the Town Board of the Town of Riverhead (hereinafter the Town Board) improperly segmented the review process mandated by the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA, ECL art 8). The rezoning at issue was an integral part of a “Residential Golf" development *(see, Matter of Citizens Concerned for Harlem Val. Envt. v Town Bd. of Town of Amenia,*264 AD2d 394; *Matter of Scenic Hudson v Town of Fishkill Town Bd.,*258 AD2d 654; *Matter of Long Is. Pine Barrens Socy. v Planning Bd. of Town of Brookhaven,*204 AD2d 548; *Matter of Schultz v Jorling,*164 AD2d 252, 255-256). However, the Environmental Impact Statement (hereinafter EIS) submitted by the developer and accepted by the Town Board discussed only the environmental impacts anticipated from the golf course. Although the developer proposed to build up to 333 houses in conjunction with this golf course, it did not specify the number or locations of these habitations in its EIS, with the consequence that their environmental impacts *449remain unexplored. The Town Board was obligated to consider the environmental concerns raised by the entire project at the time of the rezoning application, and its failure to do so violated SEQRA (see, *Matter of Citizens Concerned for Harlem Val. Envt. v Town Bd. of Town of Amenia, supra;*6 NYCRR 617.2 [ag]).

In addition, the Town Board violated SEQRA by failing to consider a “no action” alternative to the proposed development (6 NYCRR 617.9 [b] [5] [v]). It also did not sufficiently consider “mitigation” measures (6 NYCRR 617.9 [b] [5] [iv]) in that, inter alia, it refused to explore a purely organic system of maintaining the golf course at issue. Indeed, although for the purpose of the golf course alone the developer proposed to cut down nearly half of a large woodland area, the respondents have flatly denied that the project will have *any*adverse environmental impact, and insist that no mitigation measures of any sort are required *(cf., Matter of City of Rye v Korff,*249 AD2d 470). Under the circumstances, the Town Board failed to take a “hard look” at the proposed project under SEQRA *(see,*6 NYCRR 617.9).

The parties remaining contentions are either without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Ritter, Acting P.J., Altman, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur. [As amended by unpublished order entered May 1, 2002.]
Air Quality Modeling TSD Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/04/2011 04:19 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Kirk Baker

Cortney --

Here is the Air Quality Modeling TSD.

Thanks.

EPA-454_R-11-003.pdf

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN MASON

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00257

- CR

Appeal from the

120th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20220D02641 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley , C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
#### STATE of Florida v. Thomas T. LIETCH.

No. 39234.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
-----Forwarded by Donald Scata/AWAJFAA on 08/29/2013 09:56PM----- From: To: Cc: Date: Subject: "Gordon Hempton" <qordon@soundtracker.com> Donald Scata/AWA/FAA@FAA "'Samara'" <samarakester@yahoo.com>, <James Mueller@cantwell.senate.gov> 08/29/2013 11:38AM Public Comment on Order 1050.1 F Environmental Impact: Policies and Procedures

Dear Mr.Sacata, 

# lU.f] AUG 

# 30

I objecttothe notice in the Federal Register which seeks public comment on proposed changes to FAA policies and procedures. Reference: 

### Order 1050.lE Environmental Impact: Policies and Procedures will be replaced with Order 1050.1F Environmental Impact: Policies and Procedures. FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impact: Policies and Procedures is available at http://www.faa.gov/about/office org/headquarters offices/apl/environ-- policy--guidance/policy/. This notice provides the public opportunity to comment on the revised Order. The link is broken as written and results in message server error. In addition the Synopsis of Proposed changes can not be understood by the public and therefore needs to be rewritten to achieve the intentofthe notice in the Register. 1also ask thatthe deadline be extended an additional 30 days from the datethese corrections are made. Sincerely, Gordon Hempton Vice President, One Square Inch ofSilence Foundation Gordon Hempton 

## QuietPlanetLLC/TheSoundTracker® cell: 360-477-9588

3
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Nuvelo, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-131392, 333-128316, 333-126591, 333-118821, 333-112209, 333-106873, 333-103257, 333-90458 and 333-70134) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-115747, 333-108563, 333-103055, 333-101276,333-96313, 333-91471, 333-68172, 333-68170, 333-53089, 333-53087, 333-41663, 333-39194 and 333-08978) of Nuvelo, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated March 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Nuvelo, Inc. andsubsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which reportappears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Nuvelo, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

San Francisco, California 

February 27, 2007
#### Mrs. Ellen NOVOTNY v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK.

No. 4259.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

May 10, 1971.

*340David G. Perlis and Sherman F. Raphael, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ernest L. O’Bannon, Bienvenu & Culver, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before REDMANN, STOULIG and BOUTALL, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment which rejected the major part of her claim on an insurance policy for damages allegedly resulting from Hurricane Betsy.

Defendant insurer had offered plaintiff the amount of one contractor’s proposal for repairing her house, plus the cost of roofing work plaintiff had had done shortly after the hurricane. Defendant tendered this amount into court, without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to litigate the balance of her claim. The judgment appealed from awarded no other damages than those included in the tendered amount.

The questions are almost exclusively factual in nature. The insurance contract covers damages to contents from water only when it enters through a storm-caused opening in roof or walls.

The trial judge was obviously of the view that plaintiff failed to prove that her furnishings’ damage resulted from water entering through such an opening.

The starkest conflict in testimony related to allegedly broken window panes. Plaintiff and her son-in-law gave testimony to the effect that they had replaced the panes. Defendant’s adjuster testified that the putty around all window panes was old, with paint flaking off. Plaintiff and her son-in-law indicated they had some method (not clearly explained) of replacing the panes without removing the putty, or at least without removing all of it. There was also testimony about roof damage, yet the roofer’s repair charge was only $36.00. He testified he replaced some broken slates and repaired three holes in the roofing felt. Testimony by defendant’s adjuster was that evidence of water staining on plaintiff’s ceilings was very slight. Indeed there was even testimony, from the tenants in the upper apartment of plaintiff’s duplex, that no water had entered the upper apartment.

Under these circumstances we cannot say the trial judge erred in concluding, as he must have, that plaintiff did not prove that the damage to plaintiff’s furnishings was caused by water entering through either roof or broken windows.

We simply cannot, on the record before us, alter the judgment appealed from. It is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RICARDO CARRILLO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00174-CR

Appeal from the

120th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D02487)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

February 14, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime Esparza, the State’s Attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 14, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of January, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A.
Shewer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of KMP Futures Fund I LLC for the period January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer
|Name:                 |  | Kenneth A. Shewer                                                                                                                     
|Title:                |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Kenmar Preferred Investments Corp., Managing Member of KMP Futures Fund I LLC
|                      | 
|Date:                 |  | March 25, 2010
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
  





 
 HUAMI CORPORATION Number Class A Ordinary Share(s) Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands Share capital is US$1,000,000
divided into (i) 9,700,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each, (ii) 200,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each, and (iii) 100,000,000 shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each of such class or
classes as designated by the board of directors. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT is the registered holder of Class A Ordinary Share(s) in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof. EXECUTED on behalf of the said
Company on the day of by: DIRECTOR ©GOES 740 All Rights Reserved LITHO. IN U.S.A
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1809 

To designate a portion of United States Route 80 in Alabama as the ‘‘John 

R. Lewis Voting Rights Highway’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Ms. SEWELL, Ms. NORTON, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. 

CARL, Mrs. DEMINGS, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. COOPER, Mr. PASCRELL, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. DEAN, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. MEEKS, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. EVANS, 

Mr. VARGAS, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. KILMER, 

Mr. SCHRADER, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. BASS, Mr. BEYER, 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. JACOBS of California, Ms. JOHNSON of 

Texas, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, and Mr. VELA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate a portion of United States Route 80 in Alabama as the ‘‘John R. Lewis Voting Rights Highway’’, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOHN R. LEWIS VOTING 

4 RIGHTS HIGHWAY. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The portion of United States 

6 Route 80 from Selma, Alabama to Montgomery, Alabama 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1809 IH

1 shall be known as the ‘‘John R. Lewis Voting Rights 

2 Highway’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the portion of United States Route 80 from 

6 Selma, Alabama to Montgomery, Alabama is deemed to 

7 be a reference to the ‘‘John R. Lewis Voting Rights High8 way’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. C. Norris TILTON and William R. Scott, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Craig Tilton, Deceased, Clarence Jones, Jr., and Vivian Jones, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-854.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; Wallace Sample, Judge.

Appeal dismissed