alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61829-61830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration
[DEA NUMBER 171N]


Task Force on Suspicious Orders Meeting

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Suspicious Orders Task Force will be held on December 16-17, 
1997. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. both days at The 
Marriot Residence Inn, 550 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

    This meeting will be open to the public on a space available basis. 
Any interested person may observe meetings or portions thereof and 
shall be permitted to participate in the discussions at the discretion 
of the meeting chairman and with the approval of the full-time 
Designated Federal Official (DFO) in attendance.

[[Page 61830]]

    In addition to presenting limited verbal statements, interested 
parties shall be permitted to file written statements with Task Force 
members. Written statements will be taken at any time during the 
meeting and distributed to the Task Force as soon as feasible. 
Presenters of written statements are requested to provide 25 copies of 
the statement to expedite distribution to the Task Force members. If 
the presenter does not/can not provide the requested copies, the DFO 
will make the copies and the Task Force will consider the statement 
when the copies are available. Verbal comments may be limited in time 
by the DFO to insure adequate opportunity for testimony by as many 
presenters as possible.

DATES: December 16, 17, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Leser, Program Analyst, Liaison and Policy Section, Office of 
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, Washington, D.C. 
20537, 20537, Telephone (202) 307-4026, Facsimile (202) 307-8570.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you need special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact the Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration, 600 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia, 
22202, (202) 307-4026 at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Diversion Control.
[FR Doc. 97-30276 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### George WARE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-593.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# L_2005266EN.01005301.xml

| 11.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 266/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 266/53

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1656/2005

of 10 October 2005

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 October 2005 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of November 2005 for 4 278,497 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

2

---
Exhibit 15

                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------


Ranger Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
St. Petersburg, Florida

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Ranger
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002, and the related condensed
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 and for the period from inception through
June 30, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for them
to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.


                                     /s/ Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.

August 5, 2002
Tampa, Florida
#### Rose SWEDLOW and Frank Swedlow, Appellants, v. Jeanette GOLDMANN et al., Appellees.

No. 73-417.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-520 

________________________________________________________________________ 

HEALTH 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDIA 

Signed at Geneva May 20, 2008 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
INDIA 

Health: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Geneva May 20, 2008; 

 Entered into force May 20, 2008.
Exhibit 3.6
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
OXiGENE, INC.
  FIRST:
    
    The name of the corporation is OXiGENE, Inc. (the Corporation).SECOND:
    
    The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended to date, is hereby further amended by
striking out the first paragraph of Article Fourth in its entirety and by substituting in lieu of the following:FOURTH: The aggregate number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation is authorized to issue is
One Hundred Ninety Million (190,000,000) shares, of which One Hundred Seventy-Five Million (175,000,000) shares are designated
Common Stock, of the par value of One Cent ($0.01) per share, and Fifteen Million (15,000,000) shares are designated Preferred
Stock, of the par value of One Cent ($0.01) per share.THIRD:
    
    The amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted in accordance
with the provisions of Section 228 and Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
 th
 OXiGENE, Inc.By:
    /s/ James B. MurphyJames B. MurphyVice President and Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 4034 3 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FRANCISCO RUBIO

- PEREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 1482

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Rubio

Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rubio

- Perez h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 18 , 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40343 Document: 00513722193 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016No. 16

- 4034 3

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40343 Document: 00513722193 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
----

**EXHIBIT      32.4**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 10, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred                |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Charles                N. Eldred                    |
|                              |   | Senior                Vice President and            |
|                              |   | Chief                Financial Officer              |
|                              |   | Public                Service Company of New Mexico |
file:///J|/Equivio/Case18/Reports/Excel_Report%200667%207.5.11%203475/13643.TXT [7/6/2011 11:34:29 AM] MessageID: <32565264.1309179844204.JavaMail.www@app339> From: NRDC<nrdcinfo@nrdconline.org> Sent: 06/27/2011 09:04:04 AM Subject: Veto the discharge permit for the Spruce 1 mine, Attn: Docket EPA-R03-OW-2009-0985

Body: Jun 27, 2011

Administrator Lisa Jackson and EPA Staff Dear Administrator Jackson and EPA Staff, I strongly support the recommendation of Region 3 Administrator Shawn Garvin that would prevent the dumping of coal mine waste previously authorized by the discharge permit for the Spruce 1 Mine. Based on sound science, the recommendation amply documents the harm to stream flow, water quality, wildlife habitat, and fisheries expected to result from moving forward with the project as permitted. If MTR and valley fill operations move forward at the Spruce 1 Mine, two of the last "least degraded" streams in the area, the Pigeonroost Branch and Oldhouse Branch, will be irreversibly harmed. These waterways offer rich habitat for fish, salamanders, birds, and other wildlife, and provide important ecosystem services for downstream communities. If the Spruce 1 Mine moves forward as permitted, these streams will experience irrevocable harm that the Region 3 office has determined cannot be mitigated. I urge you to respect the growing body of science confirming that mountaintop removal mining, and the Spruce 1 Mine in particular, causes harm to irreplaceable resources that cannot effectively be mitigated to an acceptable degree. Please veto the Clean Water Act discharge permit for the Spruce 1 Mine. Sincerely, Mr. Christopher Fawcett 651 Maple St # 1 Brooklyn, NY 11203-1203
#### Levi FISHER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 5, 1971.

Levi Fisher, Jr., in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

READYONE INDUSTRIES, INC.

, and

IRMA RIVERA

,

Appellant s

,

v.

MANUEL RAMIREZ

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 263

- CV

Appeal from the

243 rd Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2014

- DCV

- 1389 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion stating that they have settled the issue in dispute and

asking that we render judgment in favor of Appellants to effectuate the parties’ agreement to

proceed to binding arbitration pursuant to the Mutual Agreement to A rbitrate executed by them

.

See T EX .R.A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A)(permitting appeals court to dispose of appeal by rendering

judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement); T EX .R.A PP

. P. 43.2 (permitting appeals court to

reverse the trial court’s judgment and rende r the judgment the trial court should have rendered).

Because the attorneys representing the parties have signed the settlement agreement and filed it

with the Clerk of this Court, we grant the motion. See T EX .R.A PP .P

. 42.1(a)(2)(A) (requiring

settlement agreement to be signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk before

appeals court can render judgment in accordance with the agreement). Without regard to the2

merits, the trial court’s order denying Appellants’ Motion to Compel Arbitr ation and Stay

Proceeding is reversed and judgment is rendered in favor of Appellants

. We assess all costs of

this appeal against Appellants. See T EX .R.A PP

. P. 42.1(d)(requiring appeals court to assess costs

against appellant abse nt an agreement by the parties).

October 16, 2015

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Barajas, and Larsen, Senior Judges

Barajas and Larsen, (Senior Judges)(Sitting by Assignment)
#### Warner C. LONDO and Elaine F. Londo, his wife, Appellants, v. Maurice V. SMITH, Appellee.

No. 73-645.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Richard B. Muldrew, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Appendix	A	

3D	Robotics	IRIS+	Checklist	

Go outside to ~n open ;,ore..:.! 

3 l~c:-e IR IS :. ~ 

nch po.nL 

1 Pow- on controlle r-: set lo ST O .:md RTL OFF. 

4 Press _,d hold s;3:fecy button unt.il so .. d reeL 5 Ched< 

LEO. 

Flight Check l ist 

2 Con.-..ect 

c b:lrged b.:.ttery. 

"'~ rnot~s. 

The mo-tor-$ ve 

ru: .. y ~ct··~e 

o • o • ~-

LED 

• • • • lnlti.ab:rlg.. ple.new~t 

Q. 0 . Acqu'W"l$ GPS, plene w0111t 

0 • 0 . Autoc•lot r-ellody. GPS k>dted 

•••• A~d 

Safety Butto n 

0 • 0 • '-l.otors tn3Ctive. s.::ofe to 

"1l!r"'dle 

Fhght Modes 

Standard pos t1on 

(alt1:...1de nold mode) 

STD 

f"'fmonlloo.lly 

A:.rtomode 

AUTO 

Lane 

C>t7 

-1. ~ ·e!l ~t<k do...,.••· 

• ¥ .. l >.J'"III rrr.olor~ ~0 n 

0 . 0 . Lo.s.s. of RC S'8"~ ~~.;torr.;:otc L~nda~ 

0 • 0 l)) lovor :o~nerv .a ... -to~ ic landu~ 

• • • ) )) Lo.s.s. of GPS s.gn:.l, SW<tch to m.al"ll.l.!li 

•• 0 Syster'n enor; soc: trol.bleshoot•~gude 

•••• Motors .::octn.-e. de.::octn.-ate before N~hng (see reverse) 

~ 

144 

Lo1ter mode 

l T R. 

Re:...1rn to launcn 

Rn 

bnd at l'i:'e .b..ar.tch ~ 

Con tro g •mba I 

TILT 
Control ler Flight Data I 

Press and hold the ON button to access the flight data screens. 

Press ON again to toggle between screens. . ~ 

GPS status 

connection strength .. altitude in meters 

- speed in m/s .. meters from launch point 

fl ight tin e -

- LUrf~lll dli .J~ • current longitude .. altitude in meters 

-

Flight 

• current flight mode 

GPS signal s:rength in #of 

satellites 

flight batter; level (105-12 6 V) 

flight batter; mAh 

consumed since armed 

1.:\ End your flight at 10.7 V. 

L.l.::l. Do not exceed 4000 mAh for 

a fully charged IRIS+ battery 

(80% of available capacity). 

- controller battery level (9-12 V) 

®0 ®0 @0 

Postflight 

Raise left stick above Set left stick to center Move left stick left 

center to take off and to maintain altitude. and right to rotate. 

gain altitude. 

€1~ 0 Use right stick to fly forward, 

backward. left, and right. 

1 Disarm motors. 

®0 

2 Press safety button. 

e o e o 

Hold left stick down- Press and hold until 

Lower left stick below Set left stick fully down to 

center to descend. land when near the ground. 

3 Disconnect 

battery. 4 Power off 

controller. 

left until motors stop. blinking red to deactivate.
FEDERAL AVIATION • ADMINISTRATION 

COMPLIANCE WITH E.O. 12866 

Section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 requires agencies to identify for the public, in 

a complete, clear, and simple manner, those changes in a regulatory action 

made at the suggestion or recommendation of the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of Management and Budget. 

Title of Rulemaking: Disclosure of Seat Dimensions to Facilitate Use of 

Child Safety Seats on Airplanes During Passenger-Ca rrying Operations 

Regulatory Identification Number: 2120-AKl 7 

~ OIRA did not review the rulemaking document. 

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, but did not 

suggest or recommend any changes. 

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, and we have 

documented the changes we made at OIRA's suggestion or 

recommendation in an attachment to this sheet.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-921 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SPAIN 

Signed at Vienna and Madrid 

September 21 and 28, 2010 

with 

Addenda 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SPAIN 

Nuclear Safety 

 Arrangement signed at Vienna and Madrid 

 September 21 and 28, 2010; 

 Entered into force September 21, 2010. 

 With addenda. 

 



















NOTE: The second paragraph titled "H" on this page should be titled "I".
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29708]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Meeting; Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, November 12, 1997, to consider the following 
matters:

Summary Agenda

    No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. 
These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of 
the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion 
agenda.
    Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' meetings.
    Reports of actions taken pursuant to authority delegated by the 
Board of Directors.
    Memorandum re: Executive Management Report for September 1997.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Final Amendment to Part 363--Annual 
Independent Audits and Reporting Requirements.

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum and resolution re: BIF Assessment Rates.
    Memorandum and resolution re: SAIF Assessment Rates.
    The meeting will be held in the board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2449 (Voice); (202) 416-
2004 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

    Dated: November 5, 1997.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29708 Filed 11-6-97; 10:50 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
```