alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000022698
<NAME>                        COMSAT Corporation
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          57,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,580
<PP&E>                                       2,237,834
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,298,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,650,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          204,824
<BONDS>                                        339,549
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       452,841
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,650,855
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               340,164
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,587
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,879
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,587
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,587
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Wilson, Principal Executive Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

Date: March 30, 2015

 
|   | /s/   John Wilson             |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | John   Wilson                 |
|   | Principal   Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 18-0665

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

# FILED APR 0 6 2021

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court St:ate nf VInntana v. ORDER J.W.K., Defendant and Appellant. Appellant, J.W.K., has filed a petition for rehearing ofthis Court's March 2, 2021 Memorandum Opinion affirming an order from the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, sentencing him to ten years in prison with a five-year parole restriction. J.W.K.maintains this Court's memorandum opinion conflicts with controlling statutes or case law because this Court referred to J.W.K.'s statement to the District Courtthathe did not intend to present an "affirmative defense" of mental disease or defect. However, the record reflects that J.W.K. was explaining and acknowledging that he intended to hold the State to its burden ofproof,including proving the mental element ofthe crime. Pursuantto § 46-15-323(3),MCA,

"the defendant shall provide the prosecutor with written notice of the defendant's intention to introduce evidence at trial of the defense that because ofa mental disease or disorder,the defendant did not have a particular state ofmind that is an essential element ofthe offense charged." The District Court's colloquy with J.W.K. was aimed at assessing the need for a continuance. As it pertains to J.W.K.'s request for continuance,it is irrelevant whether J.W.K.'s evidence of mental disease or defect was referred to as an affirmative defense or a defense. Under M.R.App. P. 20,this Court will consider a petition for rehearing only ifthe opinion "overlooked some fact material to the decision," if the opinion missed a question provided by a party or counsel that would have decided the case, or if our decision 04/06/2021

Case Number: DA 18-0665

### "conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court.

M.R.App.P. 20. Having fully considered Appellant's petition, the Court concludes that rehearing is not warranted under M.R.App.P. 20. IT IS TFMREFORE ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties and counsel of record.Dated this 

## -L day ofApril, 2021. / " "C't

° r )7 ChiefJustice 

# 4 r ____., 1 Justices
TS- ASLT60 Attachment #1 Material Safety Data Sheet This attachment provides a representative material safety data sheet (MSDS ) on a formulated product ( i.e. , asphalt emulsion) containing the new chemical substance
.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Annual Report of Phillips Edison-ARC Shopping Center REIT, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey S. Edison, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey S. Edison      
|Jeffrey S. Edison          
|Principal Executive Officer
|March 30, 2011
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of I.B., a child, * From the 35th District Court

 of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CV 17-07-261.

No. 11-18-00273-CV * April 4, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
256 La. 772

#### STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. Charles E. COWART v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50735.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 30, 1970.

In re: Charles E. Cowart applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our original and supervisory jurisdiction. See trial judge’s per curiam.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Asbed Palakian, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Passport Arts Inc. for
      the year ended August 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (b) | information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Passport Arts Inc.                                           

Date: October 26, 2010

/s/ Asbed
PalakianAsbed
PalakianPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and
Director
  (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting
  Officer)

---
#### Robert Richard PETTI v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39230.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 746.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63142-63143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-157-008]


Gas Transport, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 17, 1997, Gas Transport, Inc. (GTI) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following substitute tariff sheets:

Effective November 1, 1993

Sub. Original Sheet No. 126
2nd Sub. Original Sheet No. 150
Sub. Original Sheet No. 203
Sub. Original Sheet No. 208
Sub. Original Sheet No. 213
Sub. Original Sheet No. 218

Effective June 1, 1997

2nd Sub. First Revised Sheet No. 195

    GTI is filing 2nd Sub. First Revised Sheet No. 195 to comply with 
the condition in the letter order issued by the Commission on October 
31, 1997, requiring GTI to revise its Interconnection Agreement to 
limit the scope of the terms to the Operator's obligation with respect 
to material changes in compressor operations that may affect delivery 
conditions at a receipt point.
    GTI is filing the remaining tariff sheets to correct minor wording 
errors identified in the Commission's letter order.

[[Page 63143]]

    GTI states that copies of this filing were served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and the Regulatory Commissions of the states 
of Ohio and West Virginia.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31008 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kevin DOUGHERTY.

No. 61094.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Kevin Dougherty applying for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy by appeal in the event of conviction.

TATE, J.,

concurs. I agree with the Monroe Court that the affidavit seems to indicate staleness. However, the issue may be reviewed on appeal from a conviction either after trial or upon a plea of guilty.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
#### Oliver LEE, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-359.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 28, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 00-7195.

#### Ray *v.*Wetherington, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
_ New York State Teamsters Conference
Pension and Retirement Fund

April 5. 2017

The Honorable Steven T. Mnuchin
Secretary of the Treasury

U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220

Re: Withdrawal of August 31, 2016 Application of the
New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund

Dear Mr. Secretary:

The New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund withdraws its
Application filed on August 31, 2016 for suspension of benefits under the
Multiemployer Pension Relief Act of 2014 (MPRA). The Pension Fund intends to
Resubmit a revised application with the Treasury Department as soon as practicable.

decal Modelos

Michael S. Scdizo. Sr.
Co-Chairman and Employfr/Trustee

Respectfully submitted,

DB1/ 916107611

BOARD OF
TRUSTEES

Employer
Representatives

Labor
Representatives

Paul A. Markwitz
Rochester. NY

rk

TICTPATING
AMSTER
LOCALS

418 Rochester, NY

264 Cheektonaya, NY

204 Albany. NY
317 Syracuse. NY
HY Bulle, NY

$291

NY
S60 nian City, Xt
687 Potsdam. NY

‘B12 Great Neck. NY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,537
<SECURITIES>                                     8,892
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,486
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,552
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,618
<PP&E>                                           3,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        916
<COMMON>                                        27,112
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,682
<SALES>                                         19,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,270
<CGS>                                            7,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                       725
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,096
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,096
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund 

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001

Checklist Item #35 – 7.05 Designation of Power of Attorney

Does the application include a designation of power of attorney for each authorized 

representative who will represent the plan sponsor in connection with the application? 

See Section 7.05 and Appendix B

Document 35.1 provides the Pension Plan’s power of attorney and designation of its 

representative. 
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund 

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001

Checklist Item #35 – 7.05 Designation of Power of Attorney

Document 35.1 

Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative

Before the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Applicant Information:

Board of Trustees of the International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

c/o BeneSys, Inc.

700 Tower Drive, Suite 300

Troy, MI 48098

Contact: Duane Menter, Plan Manager

T: 248-813-9800

F: 248-813-9898

E: duane.menter@benesys.com

Plan Number: 001

Plan EIN: 38-6237143

Applicant hereby appoints the following representative(s) as attorney(s)-in-fact to 

represent the taxpayer before the Department of the Treasury and perform acts related to 

the attached application dated March 29, 2017 for suspension of benefits under Section 

432(e)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Representatives’ information:

Michael J. Mills, Esq. Mr. Paul Bullock

Law Offices of Michael J. Mills United Actuarial Services, Inc.

1843 Orchard Lake Road 11590 N. Meridian St., Suite 610

Sylvan Lake, MI 48320 Carmel, IN 46032

T: 248-647-7460 T: 317-580-8652

F: 248-647-7461 F: 317-580-8651

E: mjmills@mjmillspc.com E: pbullock@unitedactuarial.com

Licensing Jurisdiction: Michigan Licensing Authority: Joint Board

Bar No. Enrolled Actuary No.: 

EIN: **-* EIN: 35-2156428

Send Copies of Notices and Communications to Representative: Yes

With the exception of the acts described below, I authorize my representative to received 

and inspect my confidential tax information and to perform acts that I can perform with 

respect to the attached application dated March 29, 2017 for suspension of benefits under 

Section 432(e)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. For example, my 

representative shall have the authority to sign any agreements, consents, or similar 

documents.

35.1

Redacted by the U.S. 

Department of the Redacted by the 

U S D t t f
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-375-002]


Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 28, 1997, Wyoming Interstate Company, 
(WIC) tendered for filing recalculated rates and work papers as 
directed by the Commission in ordering paragraph C of the Commission's 
order issued June 27, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-375-000.
    WIC states that copies of the filing have been served upon each of 
WIC customer and public bodies as set forth on the Official Service 
List.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed on or before November 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30445 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Barbette Rue BOOKOUT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-242.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1971.

Louis P. Vitale, Jr., of Deutsch, Hurth, Deutsch, Wellens & Goldberg, Fort Lau-derdale, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.

Defendant was adjudicated guilty of the crime of “Aiding and Assisting in the Commission of a Felony”, and sentenced to three years in the state prison, consequent upon a plea of nolo contendere. Appellant’s point of appeal involves the refusal of the sentencing judge to allow the withdrawal of the nolo plea and accept a plea of not guilty.

It appears the plea of nolo was negotiated with the knowledge and consent of the state’s attorney and the original trial judge, and under the following circumstances testified to by the original trial judge (who was subsequently replaced by-the sentencing judge):

> “Yes, I recall by virtue of the negotiated plea between you and the then-prac-tising prosecutor, Assistant County Solicitor for my then-division.

> “It was inquired of me as to whether or not I would accept the plea of ‘no contest’ by the defendant, Mrs. Bookout, with the proviso that if a then-pending appeal from another criminal prosecution in the Federal court should be resolved favorably to her, I would then entertain and consider and grant a withdrawal of that plea and give the lady an opportunity to plead ‘not guilty’ and have the cause go tp trial.

> “I had discussed this with you and with the prosecutor. The prosecutor was in favor of it and under the circum*189stances and conditions I acknowledged that I would accept such an arrangement.”

The criminal prosecution in the Federal court was resolved favorably to appellant, and under the negotiated plea, she should have had an opportunity to plead “not guilty”.

The state concedes error and we agree. Accordingly the judgment- below is reversed and remanded to the lower court with directions to permit withdrawal of the plea of nolo contendere and allow substitution of a plea of not guilty.

Reversed.

WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Chesapeake Lodging Trust (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James L. Francis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

Date: February 16, 2011
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theodore A. Babcock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company








/s/ Theodore A. Babcock





Theodore A. Babcock


Chief Financial Officer


November 6, 2002