alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62077-62078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Scientific Computing; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Scientific computing 
(#1185).
    Date and Time: December 12, 1997, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 
1105.17, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. John Van Rosendale, Program Director, New 
Technologies Program, Suite 1122, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1962.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide recommendations and advice 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: Panel review of the new Technologies Program proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a

[[Page 62078]]

proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; 
financial data, such as salaries; and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters 
are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the government in 
the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: November 17, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30515 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
License Agreement

This License Agreement dated May 1, 2012

BETWEEN

IMAGIN8
33 FRASER AVE SUITE G12 LIBERTY VILLAGE TORONTO, ON M6K 3J9
(The “Licensor”)
And
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, INC.
(The “licensee”)

The licensor has agreed to grant
the Licensee the right to market the products of the Licensor.

Duration –
the duration of this agreement shall be for a period of Twelve months commencing on May 1, 2012 and thereafter on a month-by-month
basis unless sooner terminated by the Licensor as provided for in this agreement.

License Fee
– the Licensee will pay to the Licensor, without and deduction, abatement or setoff whatsoever, a fee equal to 30,000,000
restricted shares of the licensee. Said fees to be paid within forty-five days following the signing of this agreement.

JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, INC.

The Licensee
shall have at its option the right to contact the suppliers of the Licensor either directly or by the Licensor on its behalf.

Termination
– The licensor may at any time in it’s sole discretion, with sixty (60) days prior notice terminate this agreement
and revoke the license granted herein for any reason whatsoever and upon such termination the License shall immediately stop the
use of the license as described above.

Entire Agreement – This agreement
contains all the obligations, representations and warranties in respect of the Licensed Facilities and the entire agreement between
the parties concerning the subject matter of this agreement. The Licensee expressly disclaims reliance on any promises, inducements,
representations, warranties, collateral agreements or conditions in entering into this agreement other as expressly set out in
this agreement. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the Province of Ontario.

|Licensor:                        | Licensee:                       
|-------------------------------- | --------------------------------
|                                 |                                 
|IMAGIN8                          | JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, INC.      
|Per /s/ Nadav ElituvNadav Elituv | Per /s/ Aaron ShriraAaron Shrira
For the Docket

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters Docket ID No. OW - 2009 - 0596 Meeting with Representatives from T he Fertilizer Institute and counsel July 15 , 2010 In Attendance: U.S. Environmental Protection Ag ency – Ephraim King, OST Jim Keating , OST The Fertilizer Institute

– Bill Herz PCS Phosphate, White Springs

– Stanley Posey Barnes & Thornburg

– Fred Andes Hopping Green & Sams

– David Childs Summary : The Fertilizer Institute requested the m eeting to discuss the proposed Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters rule, published in January 2010. Specificall y, FWQC provided comments on:

 Costs of the proposed criteria and effects on industry  The effect of the criteria on permits  Proposed criteria for the North Central and Bone Valley region s  Implementation of the criteria when final  Restoration standards  Procedure for Site
- specific Alternative Criteria (SSACs )  Reference condition approach EPA did not provide any

information about EPA positions regarding addressing comments received or possible final rule requirements.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1924 

To provide first-time, low-level, nonviolent simple possession offenders an 

opportunity to expunge that conviction after successful completion of 

court-imposed probation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. NADLER, and Mr. CRENSHAW) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide first-time, low-level, nonviolent simple possession 

offenders an opportunity to expunge that conviction after 

successful completion of court-imposed probation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kenneth P. Thompson 

5 Begin Again Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1924 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATING AGE REQUIREMENT FOR EXPUNGE2 MENT OF CERTAIN CONVICTIONS FOR SIM3 PLE POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUB4 STANCES BY NONVIOLENT OFFENDERS. 

5 Section 3607(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘and the person was less than twen7 ty-one years old at the time of the offense,’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury


Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service.

ACTION: Notice of members of Senior Executive Service Performance 
Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: Performance Review Board effective October 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DiAnn Kiebler, M:ES, Room 3515, 1111 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224, Telephone No. (202) 622-
6320, (not a toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil 
Service Reform Act of 1978, the members of the Internal Revenue 
Service's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board for senior 
executives in the Office of the Chief Inspector are as follows:

John Balakos, Associate Inspector General for Program Audits, 
Department of the Treasury
John Dalrymple, Deputy Chief, Taxpayer Service
Anthony Musick, Chief Financial Officer

    This document does not meet the criteria for significant 
regulations set forth in paragraph 8 of the Treasury Directive 
appearing in the Federal Register for Wednesday, November 8, 1978 
(43FR52122).
Michael P. Dolan,
Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[FR Doc. 97-29169 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-313 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and THAILAND 

Signed at Rockville March 13, 2012 

with 

Addenda 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
THAILAND 

Nuclear Safety 

 Arrangement signed at Rockville 

 March 13, 2012; 

 Entered into force March 13, 2012. 

 With addenda. 

 













Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the Thai text of this Arrangement. If the Thai text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Simon Ridgway, Chief Executive Officer of Focus Ventures Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:    April 15, 2016





/s/ Simon Ridgway

Simon Ridgway,

Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                        Finestar International Limited

March 26, 2002

Artesyn Technologies, Inc.
7900 Glades Rd. Suite 500
Boca Raton, FL 33434
Attention: Richard J. Thompson, CFO

Dear Richard:

     Reference is made to that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated
January 15, 2002 (the "Agreement"), by and between Artesyn Technologies, Inc., a
Florida corporation, and Finestar International Limited, a British Islands
corporation (the "Purchaser"). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
have the definitions ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

     The Purchaser hereby waives any entitlement it has to the Non-exclusive
Remedy pursuant to Section 9 of the Agreement as a result of the Shelf
Registration Statement not being declared effective by the Securities and
Exchange Commissions (the "SEC") by April 5, 2002 (a "Registration Default"),
which date is the last date of the 80 day period after the date of the Agreement
in which the shelf registration Statement was to be declared effective (the
"Waiver"). This Waiver shall be effective until May 15, 2002 (the "Waiver
Period"); provided, however, if the SEC does not declare the Shelf Registration
Statement effective by May 15, 2002, at such time, any and all remedies for such
Registration Default shall be available to the purchaser, including the
immediate effectiveness of the Non-exclusive Remedy pursuant to Section 9 of the
Agreement.


                                             Sincerely,
                                             FINESTAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED


                                             By:   /s/ Bruce Cheng.
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  Bruce Cheng
                                                  Director


WJS:swp

cc:  Aaron J. Alter Esq.
     Adam R. Dolinko, Esq.
     John D. Vaughn, Esq.
#### Arthur MASSEY, Appellant, v. Iris MASSEY, Appellee.

No. 70-115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 10, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 8, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NALAN SEKER SHAW,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00122-CR

Appeal from the

175th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2022CR6815)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Nalan Seker Shaw pleaded true to one count of fraudulent use or possession of 

identifying information and was placed on deferred-adjudication community supervision for a 

period of eight years.1 The trial court certified Appellant’s right to appeal. After Appellant filed a 

notice of appeal, Appellant’s appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967) and a brief in support of the motion. Subsequently, appellate 

counsel filed a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to TEX.R. APP. P. 42.2, indicating “Appellant 

is asking this Court to dismiss this appeal.”

1 This case was transferred from our sister court in San Antonio, and we decide it in accordance with the precedent of 

that court to the extent required by TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
2

Rule 42.2(a) provides: “At any time before the appellate court’s decision, the appellate 

court may dismiss the appeal upon the appellant’s motion. The appellant and his or her attorney 

must sign the written motion to dismiss and file it in duplicate with the appellate clerk, who must 

immediately send the duplicate copy to the trial court clerk.” TEX. R. APP. P. 44.2(a). We have not 

yet issued a decision in this case, and Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal is signed by both 

Appellant and appellate counsel. Because Appellant has complied with the Rule 42.2(a)

requirements, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. We further grant Appellant’s 

counsel’s motion to withdraw. 

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

July 7, 2023

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
No. 01-15-00823-CR

Juan J. Martinez, 

 Appellant,

v.

State of Texas, 

 Appellee.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE 

COURT OF APPEALS, 

FOR THE

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, 

HOUSTON, TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

 Appellant, Juan J. Martinez, seeks an extension of time to file his brief in this appeal 

and in support would show the Court: 

Appellant timely perfected appeal from the August 20, 2015 judgment and sentence

of the trial court. The record was complete on November 17, 2015, making appellant’s 

brief due December 17, 2015. 

Appellant seeks an extension of 45 days to file his brief, making the brief due 

February 1, 2016. Appellant needs additional time to file his brief because counsel for 

Appellant has been unable to obtain a complete copy of the record. 

Following the filing of the clerk’s record on September 29, 2015, counsel requested 

a copy of the record and was told it would be provided together with the reporter’s record 

when filed. The reporter’s record was filed November 17, 2015. Counsel for Appellant 

requested the record on November 24, 2015, and was informed by the trial court clerk it 

would be provided by electronic mail. On November 30, 2015, counsel was in Grimes 

County and picked up a disc with the record. Examination of the disc revealed it only 

contained the reporter’s record and did not include two videos admitted in evidence, 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00823-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/15/2015 8:39:18 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/15/2015 8:39:18 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
exhibits 12 or 13. The record contained the notation the original exhibits had been delivered 

to this court at the direction of the trial court. 

Additional efforts to obtain a complete record included counsel traveling to Grimes 

County on December 14, 2015, to obtain a printed copy of the clerk’s record. The 

prosecuting attorney provided a copy of exhibit 12 but exhibit 13 was not available at that 

time.

Counsel’s obligation to review the record necessarily requires access to a copy of 

the record on appeal. Diligent efforts to obtain the record have not been completely 

successful and with three days before Appellant’s brief is due, counsel has just obtained 

the clerk’s record and is still attempting to secure access to State’s exhibit 13. Appellant 

requests an extension of 45 days to ensure access to, and an opportunity to review, the 

complete record. 

Appellant has requested no previous extensions.

Prayer

For the reasons set out herein, appellant prays the Court grant an extension to file 

his brief until February 1, 2016. 

Respectfully submitted,

__/s/__Clint Sare________

Clint F. Sare

Tex. Bar No. 00788354

P.O. Box 1694

Bryan, Texas 77806

(979) 822-1505

Attorney for appellant

Juan J. Martinez
Certificate of Service

I certify a copy of appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Brief was served on 

Tuck McClain, P.O. Box 599, Anderson, by fax on December 14, 2015.

__/s/_Clint Sare_____________

Clint F. Sare
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50939 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MARTIN PAUL DE

- LA

- ROSA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:16

- CR

- 317

- 5

Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Martin Paul De

- La

- Rosa appeals the 235

- month, within

- guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine

. He argues that the district court erred in failing to app ly the purity rate to the drug quantity attributed to him at the sentencing hearing and in assessing a

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 6, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50939 Document: 00514824619 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2019No. 17

- 50939

2 criminal history point for a prior sentence that was imposed outside the applicable time period of U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(e). As De

- La

- Rosa correctly concedes , our review is for plain error. To show plain error, he must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he makes such a showing, we have the discretion to correct the error but should do so only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id

. At a minimum, De

- La

- Rosa has not satisfied the third prong of the plain error test with regard to either allege d error. As to whether his substantial rights were affected, his base offense level and guidelines range remain the same after the 96.5 per cent purity rate is applied to the 88 ounces of methamphetamine attributed to De

- La

- Rosa. Likewise, his criminal h istory category and guidelines range remain the same after subtraction of the contested criminal history point. De

- La

- Rosa thus fails to demonstrate “a reasonable probability that, but for the district court’s error[s], [he] would have received a lower se ntence.” United States v. Davis , 602 F.3d 643, 647 (5th Cir. 2010). AFFIRMED. Case: 17-50939 Document: 00514824619 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2019
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0241

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

THOMPSON ST. PIERRE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court 

Reporter Cindy Kennedy Prindiville is granted an extension of time to 

and including November 5, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve the transcripts requested on appeal.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 15 2020

09/15/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0241
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of A Novel Multi-Layer Composite Material 
Manufacturing Process (Co-Injection Resin Transfer Molding) for 
Exclusive, Partially Exclusive or Non-exclusive Licenses

AGENCY: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the general availability 
of exclusive, partially exclusive or non-exclusive licenses relative to 
a novel multi-layer composite material manufacturing process (co-
injection resin transfer molding) as described in the U.S. Army 
Research Laboratory patent docket# ARL 97-17 and a subsequent patent 
application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. A licensing 
meeting is scheduled for Thursday, 29 January 1998, at Aberdeen Proving 
Ground, MD. Visit http://www.fedlabs.org/ma/pl for technical and 
registration information. A non-disclosure agreement MUST be signed 
prior to attending the licensing meeting. Licenses shall comply with 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research 
Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: 
AMSRL-CS-TT/Bldg. 434, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21005-5425, 
Telephone (410) 278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30488 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Te xas

September 9, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00469

- CV

CASH BIZ, LP , Redwood Financial, LLC, Cash Zone, LLC dba Cash Biz

, Appellants

v.

Hiawatha HENRY , Addie Harris, Montray Norris, and Roosevelt Coleman Jr., et al.,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Co urt, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 01545

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 1

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The panel has considered the appellee s ’ motion for r ehearing, and the motion is h ereby

DENIED.

_________________________________ Jason Pu lliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 D issents to the denial of the motion for rehearing without requesting a response. See Tex.R. App.P.49.2

.