alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

ALLAN JEROME STINSON,

Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D24-50 March 27, 2024 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle D. Sisco, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SLEET, C.J., and KELLY and LUCAS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
* District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 02-40701

_____________________ CASANDRA AARON; ADA WILLIAMS; ALBERTA WASHINGTON; ALBERTA J. TRAMMEL; ALICE MARTIN MORGAN; ET AL.; Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC.; MARTIN DALE JEFFUS; JAMES NEIL MAYHEW; MICHAEL LYNN LUDWICK; GESHENG DAI; MELISSA K. DUNCAN; MICHELLE GEORGINA DELGADO-BROWN; DALE THOMAS MCQUEEN; SHEILA ANN PETTY; RODNEY L. ROLAND; WILLIAM S. WINGERT; CHUKWUJCKWUN ANOZIE; VICTOR DEANTHONY LITTLES; VALERIE HONG TRUONG, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

2-01-CV-80-DF

_________________________________________________________________ March 17, 2003 Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and VANCE * , District Judge. PER CURIAM: ** After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, we are satisfied that thedistrict court correctly denied plaintiff’s motion to remand and

granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the suit. Essentially for reasons stated by the district court in it’s December 18, 2001 Order, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. AFFIRMED.
# Memorandum

u.s.Department of Transportation Office ollhe Secretory ofTransportation Subject PaY~1 f~ Island Air atthe Kodiak 11 

# 5(O~. ~~ From: Kevin Schlemmer, Chief EAS and Domestic Analysis, X-53

To: Gregory Frazier, S-3.6 Reference: Orders 2013-9-12 Date: September 27, 2013

OAA Memo NO.2012-99 Kevin Adams, X-53 Ext. 61047

Order 2013-9-12 reselected Island Air toprovide EAS atthe Alitak, Amook Bay, Kitoi. Bay, Moser Bay, Olga Bay, Port Bailey, Port Williams, Seal Bay, Uganik, West Point, and Zachar Bay, Alaska (Kodiak 11), from November 1,2013, through October 31,2015. Appendix Cofthat Order shows the initial Off-Peak period beginning January 5,2013, i.e., before the selection period begins. That is anerror, because the Off-Peak begins a year later, i.e., January 5, 2014. We have made this adjustment; and will addthis memo to both the docket andto ADDs.

#
CERTIFICATION                                                       Exhibit 31.1

I, Martin A. Roenigk, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CompuDyne Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I,  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's   auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  registrant's  board  of
directors:

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

     Date: May 15, 2007
                                       /s/ Martin Roenigk
                                       ------------------
                                       Martin Roenigk
                                       Chief Executive Officer



                                       40
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statements of income and consolidated balance sheets and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000021212
<NAME> COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          72,124
<SECURITIES>                                       500
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,007
<INVENTORY>                                     61,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,040
<PP&E>                                          73,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,483
<BONDS>                                         13,291
<COMMON>                                        70,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,828
<SALES>                                        158,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,106
<CGS>                                          137,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   739
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    80
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,736
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,317
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1756 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1756

    To require the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of 
Commerce to provide estimates relating to the distribution of aggregate 
      economic growth across specific percentile groups of income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2021

    Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (for herself and Mr. Beyer) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of 
Commerce to provide estimates relating to the distribution of aggregate 
      economic growth across specific percentile groups of income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Measuring Real Income Growth Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. ESTIMATES OF AGGREGATE ECONOMIC GROWTH ACROSS INCOME GROUPS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Bureau.--The term ``Bureau'' means the Bureau of 
        Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce.
            (2) Gross domestic product analysis.--The term ``gross 
        domestic product analysis''--
                    (A) means a quarterly or annual analysis conducted 
                by the Bureau with respect to the gross domestic 
                product of the United States; and
                    (B) includes a revision prepared by the Bureau of 
                an analysis described in subparagraph (A).
            (3) Recent estimate.--The term ``recent estimate'' means 
        the most recent estimate described in subsection (b) that is 
        available on the date on which the gross domestic product 
        analysis with which the estimate is to be included is 
        conducted.
    (b) Inclusion in Reports.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, in each gross domestic product analysis 
conducted by the Bureau, the Bureau shall include a recent estimate of, 
with respect to specific percentile groups of income, the total amount 
that was added to the economy of the United States during the period to 
which the recent estimate pertains, including in--
            (1) each of the 10 deciles of income; and
            (2) the highest 1 percent of income.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Commerce such sums as are necessary to 
carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Harry O. CRAMER.

No. 62645.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Harry O. Cramer, applying for remedial writ. Parish of Orleans. 358 So.2d 1277.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 10.1


 





RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS


 


OF


 


CANNABICS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.


 


 


 


The following is a
true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority (74%) of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice
to this meeting having been waived, held this 29th day of January, 2018;


 


WHEREAS there has been
presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to Accept the Resignation of Itamar Borochov as Director and CEO; to Vote
that Eyal Barad assume the position as CEO, and to vote Ehud Rieger as a new Director and Board Member.


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a
preference in the issue and pursuant to NRS 78.320, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that:


 


The Corporation hereby
ACCEPTS the Resignation of Itamar Borochov;


That it VOTED Ehud
Rieger as a Director and Board Member;


That it VOTED for Eyal
Barad to assume the position of CEO.


 


The Above qualified
people have been nominated, and have accepted their position as DIRECTORS and OFFICERS of the Company.


 


Said Motion is hereby
passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records.


 


 


 


Dated: 29th January, 2018


 


 


/s/ Eyal
Barad                    


Eyal Barad,


on behalf of Cannabics, Inc., Majority
Shareholders
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1826 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate late enrollment 

penalties under part B of the Medicare program for individuals residing 

in Puerto Rico if such individuals enroll within 5 years of becoming 

entitled to benefits under part A of such program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N (for herself and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 

in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

late enrollment penalties under part B of the Medicare 

program for individuals residing in Puerto Rico if such 

individuals enroll within 5 years of becoming entitled 

to benefits under part A of such program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness in Medicare 

5 Part B Enrollment Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1826 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATING LATE ENROLLMENT PENALTIES 

2 UNDER PART B OF THE MEDICARE PROGRAM 

3 FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN 

4 PUERTO RICO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1839(b) of the Social Se6 curity Act is amended in the second sentence by inserting 

7 ‘‘or months occurring in the 5-year period beginning on 

8 the date on which the individual becomes entitled to bene9 fits under part A if such individual was residing in Puerto 

10 Rico as of such date and such date is after the date that 

11 is 4 years before the date of the enactment of the Fairness 

12 in Medicare Part B Enrollment Act of 2021’’ before the 

13 period at the end of such sentence. 

14 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub15 section (a) shall apply with respect to premiums paid for 

16 months beginning on or after the date of the enactment 

17 of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
257 La. 261

#### CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. Reginald T. BAHLINGER.

No. 51061.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 30, 1970.

In re: City of Baton Rouge applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs granted. The ruling of the trial judge is annulled and set aside at this time. It is ordered that the testimony of Charles Stevenson as to the results of the intoxi-meter test be admitted on the showing recited in the Bill of Exception perfected by the City of Baton Rouge. The Court reserves to defendant the right to reurge this issue in the event of conviction, based upon a properly reserved Bill of Exceptions. See State v. Carey, 245 La. 79, 156 So.2d 799.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the As Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, John R. Ambroseo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Coherent, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 2, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coherent, Inc.

 
| Date:   May 11,   2011 |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   |
|                                       |   |
| /s/:   JOHN R. AMBROSEO                    |   |
| John   R. Ambroseo                         |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer    |   |

 

----
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 2, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM D. JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WALTER DINWIDDIE,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-6193

(D.C. No. 09-CV-00102-C)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER 

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Before KELLY, BRISCOE, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner-Appellant William D. Jones, a state inmate appearing pro se,

seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) allowing him to appeal the district

court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as untimely. 

To obtain a COA, Mr. Jones must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 483-84 (2000). Mr. Jones has not made the requisite showing, and therefore

we deny a COA and dismiss the appeal.

Mr. Jones was convicted of two counts of first-degree rape, one count of

second-degree rape and one count of forcible sodomy and sentenced to

consecutive 100 year terms on each count. The judgment and sentence was
- 2 -

affirmed on direct appeal on July 28, 2004, and became final 90 days thereafter,

on October 26, 2004. See Rhine v. Boone, 182 F.3d 1153, 1155 (10th Cir. 1999). 

Mr. Jones filed his federal habeas petition on December 20, 2008, well after the

one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

The district court adopted the thorough report and recommendation of the

magistrate judge, which concluded that Mr. Jones’s petition was untimely, and

was not saved by statutory or equitable tolling. On appeal, Mr. Jones renews his

arguments, including the merits, and contends that he is actually innocent and that

the state must show a lack of diligence and prejudice before it can prevail on a

laches defense citing Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 282 (1961). As to

the laches argument, we doubt that laches applies in this context given a statutory

limitation period which Mr. Jones cannot meet and the district court’s rejection of

equitable tolling. See United States v. Marolf, 173 F.3d 1213, 1217-18 (9th Cir.

1999). That said, we do not think that the disposition on limitations grounds is

reasonably debatable. See Slack, 529 U.S. at 483-84. 

We DENY a COA, IFP status, and DISMISS the appeal.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6272

HAROLD SHAW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM R. DAVIS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1723-2-20-AJ) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 27, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Harold Shaw seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Shaw v. Davis , No. CA-97-1723-2-20-AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61572-61573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes 
the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. The 
Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting 
comments on the following collection of information was published in 62 
FR 38339, July 17, 1997.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 18, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Street, ABC-100; Federal 
Aviation Administration; 800 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, DC 
20591; Telephone number (202) 267-9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Overflight Billing and Collection Customer Information Form.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0618.
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Approximately 600 business or other for-profit 
organizations.
    Abstract: The customer information form is needed in order to 
request and obtain proper billing information from carriers as well as 
properly identify Tail numbers as commercial or general aviation in 
order that carriers are charged the correct rate.
    Annual Estimated Burden Hours: 50 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20503, Attention FAA Desk Officer.

[[Page 61573]]

    Comments are Invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on November 12, 1997.
Phillip A. Leach,
Clearance Officer, United States Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 97-30225 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### Lois B. POWERS, Petitioner, v. SHELL’S CITY et al., Respondents.

No. 42639.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 6, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.