alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

This Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the “Assignment and Assumption Agreement”) is entered into as of
5/25/2016 by and between U.S, Bank National Association

(“Assignor”) and Banner Bank (“Assignee”).
All terms used, but not defined, herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Underlying Agreement (defined
below).

WHEREAS, Assignor and Federal National Mortgage Association, a federally chartered corporation, as financial agent of
the United States (“Fannie Mae”), are parties to a Commitment to Purchase Financial Instrument and Servicer
Participation Agreement, a complete copy of which (including all exhibits, amendments and modifications thereto) is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Underlying Agreement”);

WHEREAS, Assignor has agreed to assign to Assignee all of its rights and obligations under the Underlying Agreement
with respect to the Eligible Loans that are identified on the schedule attached hereto as Schedule 1 (collectively, the

“Assigned Rights and Obligations”); and

WHEREAS, Assignee has agreed to assume the Assigned Rights and Obligations.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s rights and obligations under the Underlying
Agreement with respect to the Assigned Rights and Obligations.

2. Assumption. Assignee hereby accepts the foregoing assignment and assumes all of the rights and obligations of
Assignor under the Underlying Agreement with respect to the Assigned Rights and Obligations.

3. Effective Date. The date on which the assignment and assumption of rights and obligations under the Underlying
Agreement is effective is 1/20/2012 .

4, Successors. All future transfers and assignments of the Assigned Rights and Obligations transferred and assigned
hereby are subject to. the transfer and assignment provisions of the Underlying Agreement. This Assignment and
Assumption Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the permitted successors and assigns of the
parties hereto.

5. Counterparts. This Assignment and Assumption Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
an original, but all of which together constitute one and the same instrument.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee, by their duly authorized officials, hereby execute and deliver this
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, together with Schedule 1, effective as of the date set forth in Section 3 above.

ASSIGNOR: _U.S. Bank National Association ASSIGNEE: “Dayanee PAAK

itle:_Atovtocge Banking Off Cer
Date: S-as-J/6
EX-32.2

----

**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bio-Carbon SystemsInternational Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Ben Ward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | By:    |   /s/ Ben Ward             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |   |   Ben Ward                 |
|   |   |   Chief Financial  Officer |

 

Dated:     April15, 2011

 

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIOVANI CERDE REYES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-70969

Agency No. A087-756-191

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted September 11, 2014

San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, SCHROEDER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Jiovani Cerde Reyes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) order dismissing his appeal. Cerde

Reyes appealed to the Board from an immigration judge’s (IJ) removal order,

which was based upon Cerde Reyes’s admissions and concessions before the IJ.

FILED

OCT 24 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252; we review de novo, Perez-Mejia v.

Holder, 663 F.3d 403, 409 (9th Cir. 2011); and we deny the petition. 

The Board did not err in dismissing Cerde Reyes’s appeal because Reyes

admitted the factual allegations contained in his Notice to Appear and conceded he

was removable on the basis of his Arizona conviction for possession of a forgery

device, a crime which Cerde Reyes conceded—and the IJ correctly determined,

based on an independent review of the statute—was categorically a crime

involving moral turpitude. “[I]f at the . . . pleading stage an alien . . . makes

admissions of fact or concedes removability, and the IJ accepts them, no further

evidence concerning the issues of fact admitted or law conceded is necessary.” Id.

at 414. And if “the immigration judge is satisfied that no issues of law or fact

remain, the immigration judge may determine that removability as charged has

been established by the admissions of the respondent.” Id. at 416 (citing 8 C.F.R. §

1240.10(c)). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 

2
Exhibit 99.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
accompanying this certification and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Martin Roenigk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C Section 1350, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date: May 15, 2003

                                      /s/ Martin Roenigk
                                     ---------------------------
                                     Martin Roenigk
                                     Chief Executive Officer
#### Juan COLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-928.

District Court of Appeal. Fourth District.

Sept. 25, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Thomas M. Carney and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends (and the State concedes) that the offenses charged under Counts 1 and 2 were facets or phases of the same criminal transaction for which a single sentence should have been imposed. Moody v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 909; Lietch v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 203. Accordingly, defendant’s convictions are affirmed but sentences on Counts 1 and 2 are vacated and the cause remanded with directions that defendant be resentenced in accordance with this opinion.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
# Fo urth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 16, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00059

- CV

D’SPAIN CONSTRUCTION L.L.C.

,

Appellant

v.

George Samuel LUDOLF

, Appellees

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20

- 274

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On April 26, 2021, appellant filed an agreed motion to abate this appeal to allow time for

the finalization of settlement documents. The motion state d the parties reached a settlement that require d surveys and other conditions to be completed by October 1, 2021, and request ed abatement of the appeal until that date. On April 28, 2021 , we granted the motion to abate and denied in part, abating the case until May 28 , 2021 and ordering the appellant to file (1) a motion to dismiss the appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1; (2) a detailed status update; or (3) its brief. On May 24, 2021, the appellant filed a detailed status upda te, stating that the parties’ surveyor intends to be done by May 28, 2021, and that the appellant will provide this court with an update on or before June 28, 2021.

T his appeal is ABATED until Ju ly 30 , 2021. Appellant is ORDERED to complete all requirements and file, no later than Ju ly 30 , 2021, (1) a motion to dismiss this appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 ; or ( 2 ) its brief.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m y hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of June, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29543]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP97-1-011 and RP97-201-008]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 30, 1997, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in 
Appendix A to the filing, to be effective August 1, 1997.
    National Fuel states that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's Order issued October 21, 1997, in Docket Nos. 
RP97-1-008, RP97-201-006 and RP97-1-007.
    National Fuel states that it is serving copies of this filing with 
its firm customers, interested state commissions and each party 
designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29543 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of Extramural Research; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Peer Review Oversight Group (PROG) on February 13-14, 1997, in the 
Rockledge II Centre, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20817. 
The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on February 13 and 
from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. on February 14. The meeting is open to the 
public, with attendance limited to space available.
    Topics for discussion include: NIH extramural electronic 
reinvention activities, the rating of grant applications, the 
integration of Neuroscience Reviews, and the review of multiple 
mechanisms within one review group.
    The meeting agenda and roster of committee members are available on 
the World Wide Web via the NIH Home Page (http://www.nih.gov.grants/) 
or from Dr. Peggy McCardle, Executive Secretary, PROG, and Special 
Assistant to the Deputy Director for Extramural Research, OD, NIH, 
Building 1, Room 150, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 402-2246. 
Individuals who plan to attend the meeting and need special assistance, 
such as sign language interpretation or other special accommodations, 
should contact Dr. McCardle by February 7, 1997.
    This meeting is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to proceed with the meeting as scheduled 
in order to address these issues in a timely manner.

    Dated: January 31, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-3079 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 99.4  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (the Trust) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Rostowsky, Principal Financial Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.  This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.  Date: March 28, 2013   /s/   STEVEN ROSTOWSKYSteven   RostowskyPrincipal   Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0718

_____________________________

BOSSIE SAMUEL WATTS JR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman Lee Robinson, Judge.

May 8, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Dixon, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1765 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1765

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing a proposed rule 
relating to restricted access to the Washington Channel in Washington, 
                     D.C., and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2021

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing a proposed rule 
relating to restricted access to the Washington Channel in Washington, 
                     D.C., and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Washington Channel Public Access 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF RULE.

    The Secretary of the Army may not finalize, implement, or enforce 
the proposed rule entitled ``Washington Channel, Fort McNair, 
Washington, DC; Restricted Area'', published by the Department of the 
Army on December 29, 2020 (Docket No. COE-2019-0010; 85 Fed. Reg. 
85570), or any other rule that restricts public access to the 
Washington Channel in Washington, DC.
                                 <all>
```
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the TreasuryRedacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.6
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texas-New Mexico Power Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(each registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Thomas G. SategnaThomas G. SategnaVice President,
Controller and Treasurer
Texas-New Mexico Power Company
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Melvin DILLARD v. CIVIL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF PLAQUEMINES DIVISION D State of Louisiana.

No. 61898.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Melvin Dillard applying for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Parish of Plaquemines.

Writ granted. Clerk of Court ordered to consider relator’s petition filed in trial court as a request for service on defendant at address listed therein.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion applicant must inform the Clerk of Court where the defendant should be served.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1349

ROBERT EMERSON LAMB,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,

District Judge. (04:07-cv-00019-RBS)

Submitted: August 10, 2007 Decided: August 20, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Emerson Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and

dismissing it as frivolous and for failure to state a claim under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i),(ii). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Lamb v. Astrue, No. 4:07-cv-00019-

RBS (E.D. Va. April 10, 2007). We deny Lamb’s pro se motion to

expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 9757.

#### Stoeckley, an Infant, by etc., *v.*Hirzel et al.

(Decided November 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas County.

*Mr. Orville S. Brumback*and *Mr. Frederick W. Sturdivant,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Eezvis & Doyle*and *Mr. J. W. Schaufelberger,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.