alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2 – CFO Certification**








**ROYAL
      INVEST INTERNATIONAL CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
      International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathan Lapkin, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.





By:
      /s/ Nathan Lapkin


Nathan
      Lapkin


Chief
      Financial Officer





September
      18, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
      Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of China Du Kang Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/  Liu Su YingLiu Su YingChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)November 4, 2011
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of ZST Digital Networks, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### Dennis KELLERMAN a/k/a Natividad Barron, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

CARROLL, CHARLES (Ret.) Associate Judge. —,

This appeal is by the defendant from conviction of involuntary sexual battery by threatening to use force of violence likely to cause serious personal injury.

Citing and relying on *Doyle v. Ohio,*426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); *Bennett v. State,*316 So.2d 41 (Fla.1975); *Shannon v. State,*335 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976), appellant contends his conviction should be reversed because of the attempt of the prosecutor to impeach his exculpatory story, related in his testimony at trial, on cross-examination by questioning him as to whether he had related that story to the police officers after arrest and being warned of his *Miranda*rights. In this case there was no objection thereto, as there was in *Doyle,*also it was disclosed that the defendant had talked to the officers after arrest, relating other matters. In the circumstances of this case the decisions relied on by the appellant are not such as to prompt reversal. See: *Clark v. State,*336 So.2d 468 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976).

Judgment affirmed.

PEARSON, J., dissents.

NATHAN, Judge,

concurring' specially.

I agree that the judgment below should be affirmed, but wish to add that, in my opinion, the primary basis for affirmance is that this case simply does not present an issue of deprivation of fifth and fourteenth amendment rights. The defendant in this case did not invoke his right to remain silent. He freely conversed with the police officer who brought him to the area in which the victim was waiting for identification. This fact was brought out by the defense in cross examination of the officer.

When the prosecution cross examined defendant, the objective was to show that the story defendant told at trial was different from his earlier statements. The effect of this cross examination was not to deprive defendant of any constitutional right. *Cf. Morgan v. State,*Fla. 3d DCA, opinion filed *902December 6, 1977. (The crucial aspect of the challenged testimony was that it was not elicited to show defendant’s assertion of her right to remain silent.)
### NUMBER 13

- 1 1

- 00 010

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THERESA ROSALES

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 36 th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Theresa Rosales , by and through h er attorney, has filed a motion to

withdraw h er appeal because s he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to withdraw the2

appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

ente rtained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

3rd day of February , 2011

.
****

 

 

 

**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Latin America Equity Fund, a series of DWS International Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSR; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| December 28, 2007 | /s/Michael G. Clark                                                     |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              | Michael G. Clark                                                        |
|              | President                                                               |
|              | DWS Latin America Equity Fund, a series of DWS International Fund, Inc. |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 55647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:
    The meeting will be open to the public to provide concept review of 
proposed contract solicitations.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Panel: The Effects of Swimming Lessons on the Risk of 
Drowning (TELECONFERENCE).
    Date: November 5, 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. (ET)--adjournment.
    Place: 6100 Executive Boulevard, 6100 Building--Room 5E01, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NICHD, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 6100 Building--Room 
5E01, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone: 301-496-1696.
    Purpose/Agenda: To provide concept review of proposed contract 
solicitations.

    This notice is published less than 15 days prior to the meeting 
due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by the 
review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research and No. 93.865, Research Mothers and Children], 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: October 21, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-28378 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### Soap Salts Registration Review Focus Meeting with the Soap Salts Task Force

Meeting Summary

Wednesday, May 8, 2013; 2

– 3 pm (Eastern time); S

‐ 9100

EPA Attendees:

Pesticide Re

‐ evaluation Division: Monica Wait, Tracy Perry

Environmental Fate and Effects Division: Bill Eckel, Stephen Carey, Mark Corbin

Registration Division: Gene Benbow

Soap Salts Task Force (TF) Attendees:

Chad Mateer, Mark Mongiovi (Woodstream)

David Lewis (Lewis and Harrison, representing Scotts)

Fred Obenchain (Pathway)

Nina Wilson (Gowan), phone

Eliot Harrison (Lewis and Harrison, TF Manager)

Jim Yowell (Agro

‐ K), phone

Discussion Topics:

 EPA provided an overview of the next steps in the registration review process for soap

salts following the close of the 60

‐ day public comment period on the preliminary risk

assessments on May 20, 2013.

 EPA provided an overview of the soap salts preliminary ecological risk assessment and

background on how the endangered species assessments will be conducted. EPA

highlighted places in the existing ecological risk assessment where there are

uncertainties with regard to soap salts products that lead to conservative assumptions.

The uncertainties may be able to be refined with additional soap salts product

information and/or clearer product labels resulting in lower risk estimates or

conclusions of no risk.

 The soap salts task force registrants provided an overview of some of their products,

most of which are used in the residential market only. Woodstream provided a table for

all of their active Section 3 registrations which included useful information including

application rate, the % of an acre covered if the entire container of product is used,

treatment type, and chemical composition. In general, the task force registrants believe

most of their products are within the lower range of application rates (less than 25

pounds active ingredient per acre) assessed by EFED.

 The soap salts task force provided some other comments on the preliminary ecological

risk assessment such as on the acute daphnia study which was used. EPA stated that usage data could help to further refine the risk assessment by

characterizing the extent and geographical distribution of soap salts use.

 The task force agreed to compile a package of product information, as discussed, and

any other comments on the risk assessment and submit it to the soap salts registration

review docket. EPA will consider and incorporate this information when preparing the

final ecological risk assessment for registration review.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-307 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EMPLOYMENT 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GABON 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Libreville November 26, 2007 and 

March 7, 2008 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
GABON 

Employment 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Libreville November 26, 2007 

 and March 7, 2008; 

 Entered into force March 7, 2008. 





NOTE: This is an unofficial translation provided by the Government of the Gabonese Republic. When the official English translation becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62033-62034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-59-010]


Midwestern Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 7, 1997, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Second Revised Sheet No. 54
Sub Third Revised Sheet No. 110A

    Midwestern states that these sheets are filed in compliance with 
the Commission's October 24, 1997 Letter Order in the above-referenced 
docket (October 24 Letter Order). In accordance with the October 24 
Letter Order, Midwestern requests an effective date of November 1, 
1997.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make

[[Page 62034]]

protestants parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30456 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 5, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00265

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.S. AND J.R.S., CHILDREN

From the 454th Judicial District Court

, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 11

- 25367

- CV

Honorable Vivian Torres , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting : Patricia O. Alvare z, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant ’ s motion for recon sideration , and the motion is

her eby DENIED.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of May, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register: October 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 192)]
[Notices]               
[Page 61520]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05oc10-139]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts

 
National Council on the Arts 171st Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the National Council on the Arts will be held on October 29, 2010 in 
Room M-09 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506.
    This meeting, from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. (ending time is approximate), 
will be open to the public on a space available basis. The meeting will 
include opening remarks by the Chairman, and Congressional and White 
House updates. This will be followed by presentations on a national 
study of outdoor festivals and the Mayors Institute on City Design 25th 
anniversary program, as well as a presentation by Ann Markusen, 
Director of the Project on Regional and Industrial Economics at the 
University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute. After the presentations, 
the Council will review and vote on applications and guidelines, and 
will adjourn following concluding remarks.
    If, in the course of the open session discussion, it becomes 
necessary for the Council to discuss non-public commercial or financial 
information of intrinsic value, the Council will go into closed session 
pursuant to subsection (c)(4) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552b. Additionally, discussion concerning purely personal 
information about individuals, submitted with grant applications, such 
as personal biographical and salary data or medical information, may be 
conducted by the Council in closed session in accordance with 
subsection (c)(6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b.
    Any interested persons may attend, as observers, Council 
discussions and reviews that are open to the public. If you need 
special accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office 
of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TTY-TDD 202/682-5429, 
at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from the Office of Communications, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506, at 202/682-5570.

     Dated: September 30, 2010.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines and Panel Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-24886 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Weeks of November 10, 17, 24, and December 1, 1997.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of November 10

    There are no meetings the week of November 10.

Week of November 17--Tentative

Friday, November 21
11:30 a.m.--Affirmation Session (public meeting) (if needed)

Week of November 24--Tentative

    There are no meetings the week of November 24.

Week of December 1--Tentative

    There are no meetings the week of December 1.
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Bill Hill (301) 415-
1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at:

http:/www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm

    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers: 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#01766c69416f73622f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7a0babf97b9a5b4f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e0eff3c4eaf6e7aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8ccc3dfe8c6dacb86cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 6, 1997.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
Secy Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29885 Filed 11-17-97; 2:27 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50125

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Martin Flores, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:21-CR-211-2

______________________________

Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Martin Flores has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 10, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50125 Document: 00516605304 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2023
No. 22-50125

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-50125 Document: 00516605304 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/10/2023