alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 15, 1997, 8 
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: Ramada Inn, Embassy Ballroom, 8400 Wisconsin Ave., 
Bethesda, MD.
    Contact Person: Leander B. Madoo, Center for Drug Evaluation and 
Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-5455, or FDA Advisory Committee 
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC 
area), code 12545. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date 
information on this meeting.
    Agenda: The Committee will discuss the safety and efficacy of new 
drug application (NDA) 20-793, Cafcit<SUP>TM</SUP> (caffeine citrate 
injection, 10 milligram/milliliter), Roxane Laboratories, Inc., for 
intravenous or oral use in the treatment of apnea of prematurity.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by December 5, 
1997. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Time allotted for each 
presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral 
presentations should notify the contact person before December 5, 1997, 
and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or 
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed 
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to 
make their presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: November 14, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-30616 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 accompanying this certification
and filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Martin Roenigk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 10, 2005

                               /S/ MARTIN ROENIGK
                             --------------------------
                                   Martin Roenigk
                               Chief Executive Officer
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2096

LT Case No. 2010-CF-001745-A

_____________________________

CHARLES R. SOUTHERN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Kevin A. Blazs, Judge.

Charles R. Southern, Miami, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

November 21, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., EISNAUGLE, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Healthway Shopping Network, Inc. a Florida corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Cleveland Gary, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Healthway Shopping Network, Inc., and will be retained by Healthway Shopping Network, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Cleveland GaryCleveland GaryChief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)July 24, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0019

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SACRAMENTO JUAN DOMINGUEZ JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 11, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 5 2023

07/05/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1775

STEPHEN K. GILLEY,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Creditor – Appellee,

GERALD S. SCHAFER,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:13-cv-00916-WO; 12-11443; 12-

02066)

Submitted: December 31, 2014 Decided: January 14, 2015

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sophia L. Harvey, LIAO HARVEY PC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 

for Appellant. Anne K. Small, General Counsel, Michael A. 

Conley, Deputy General Counsel, Jacob H. Stillman, Solicitor, 

Tracey A. Hardin, Assistant General Counsel, Morgan Bradylyons,
2

Bankruptcy Counsel, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Stephen K. Gilley appeals the district court’s order 

affirming the bankruptcy court’s order finding that Gilley’s 

disgorgement debt was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. 

§ 523(a)(19) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Gilley v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, No. 1:13-

cv-00916-WO; 12-11443; 12-02066 (M.D.N.C. June 3, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

----

----

| RE: | Tasman Metals Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2013 (the “Annual Report”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the Year Ended August 31, 2013 (the “2013 MD&A”) |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1.      | The amended and restated technical report entitled “Amended and RestatedPreliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Norra Kärr (REE - Y - Zr) Deposit, Gränna, Sweden” dated July 9, 2013, which the undersigned has prepared (the "Norra Kärr PEA Report"); |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.      | The technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Norra Karr REE - Zirconium Deposit, Granna, Sweden”  dated January 20, 2011, which the undersigned has prepared  (the “Technical Report”); and |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.      | The amended and restated technical report entitled “Amended and Restated Technical Report for Olserum REE Deposit, Southern Sweden” dated June 20, 2013, which the undersigned has prepared (the “Olserum Report”). |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
Exhibit 32.1.1

Certification

I, Hank J. Ratner, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A to Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Madison Square Garden Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date August 5, 2011



| |  |                                       |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Hank J. Ratner                    |  | 
| |  | Hank J. Ratner                        |  | 
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer |  |
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AC KI E R I C HA R D G R E GG , P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. BR I AN BE LL EQUE, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 35600 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 9 8 4 - O MP ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon O w e n M . P a nne r , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t23, 2010 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , H A W K I N S , a n d T H O M A S , C ir c u it J u d g e s . O re g o n state p riso n erJa ck ie R ich ar d G re g g ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 p e titio n a s s e c o n d o rs u c c e s s iv e . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED

SEP 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 35600 2 R e l y i ng on the “ l e gi t i m a t e e xc us e ” doc tr i ne , G r e gg c ont e nds tha thi s pe t i t i on i s nots e c ond ors uc c e s s i ve w i thi n the m e a ni ng of the A nt i t e rr or i s m a nd E f f e c t i ve D ea th P enal ty A ctbecause B lake l yv . W as hi ngton , 542 U . S . 296 ( 2004) , ha d not b een d eci d ed atth e atth e t i m e h e fi l ed h i s p rev i o u s h ab eas p et i t i o n . B ecau se G r e gg ne i the rs oughtnorr e c e i ve d author i z a t i on f r om thi s c ourtbe f

or e f i l i ng the in s ta n t p e titio n , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w a s w ith o u t ju r is d ic tio n to c o n s id e rit. See 28 U . S . C . § 2 24 4(b)(3)(A ); see a l so B u rto n v. S tew a rt , 54 9 U . S . 14 7, 15 2-54 (200 7). T o the e xt e ntB urt on i s appl y i ng f ora n or de rauthor i z i ng as e c ond or s u c c e s s iv e p e titio n , s u c h r e q u e s t is d e n ie d . Se e U ni te d State s v . C ook , 386 F . 3d 949, 950 ( 2004) ( de ny i ng a n appl i c a t i on f oras e c ond ors uc c e s s i ve § 2255 m ot i on because “ the S up re m e C ou rthas notm ade B lakel y re troac t i ve t o cas es on col l at er al r e v ie w ” ) . AF F I RME D.
#### William D. RUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 46298.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 6, 1971.

Travis Buckley, Laurel, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Velia Ann Mayer, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 15.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-163715 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Amended 2007Share Incentive Plan and 2008 Share Incentive Plan of China Nuokang Bio-Pharmaceutical Inc. of our report dated June 2, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of China Nuokang Bio-Pharmaceutical Inc. included in this AnnualReport on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst &Young Hua Ming 

Shanghai, The People’s Republic of China 

June 2, 2010
[Cite as State v. McAlmont, 133 Ohio St.3d 162, 2012-Ohio-4327.]

T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLANT , v . M C A LMONT , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State v. McAlmont, 133 Ohio St.3d 162, 2012-Ohio-4327.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell

. (No. 2011-0065

— Submitted September 12, 2012

— Decided September 27, 2012.) A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, No. 09-CA-21, 2010-Ohio-5879.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell , 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012-Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243

. O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L ANZINGER , and M C G EE B ROWN , JJ.,

concur. L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’D ONNELL , and C UPP , JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012- Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243

.

__________________ D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Pr osecuting Attorney, and Andrew Picek, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Murr, Compton, Claypool & Macbeth and Charles M. Blue, for appellee.

______________________
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2650]


Bureau of Consular Affairs; 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information 
Collection; Affidavit of Identifying Witness (DS-71)

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Originating Office: Bureau of Consular Affairs.
    Title of Information Collection: Affidavit of Identifying Witness 
(DS-71).
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: DSP-71.
    Respondents: Citizens of the United States.
    Estimted Number of Respondents: 88,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 5 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 7,333.
    Public Comments are being solicited to permit the agency to----
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: October 31, 1997.
Eliza McClenaghan,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30738 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-M
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement ofDeere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, James A. Israel,President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’sactivities for the period from October 9, 2009 (the date of issuance ofthe John Deere Owner Trust 2009-B transaction subject to the requirements ofRegulation AB) through October 31, 2009 (the “Reporting Period”) and ofDeere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and ServicingAgreement dated as of October 9, 2009 among John Deere CapitalCorporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust2009-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledgebased on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all itsobligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 
|   | Date: January 4,  2010 | Deere Credit  Services, Inc. |
|--------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|   |                        |
|   |                        |
|   | By                          | /s/ James A. Israel               |
|   |                        | James  A. Israel                  |
|   |                        | President                         |

 

----