alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### E. G. McCOY, Appellant, v. Burnice BROWN, et al., Appellees.

No. 46184.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 29, 1971.

Carl E. Berry, Jr., Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Melvin, Melvin & Melvin, Laurel, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Attune RTD (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Thomas Bianco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and








2.
The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Thomas BiancoThomas Bianco

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





Dated: April 7, 2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 25, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph M. ODonnell, Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|/s/    JOSEPH M.
ODONNELL                                             
|Joseph M. ODonnell Chairman and Chief Executive Officer August 4, 2004
#### Julia Annette HOWARD, Appellant, v. Norman FLACK, Appellee.

No. 70-452.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 97-10371

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

NATIONAL FAMILY CARE LIFE INSURANCE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-1902-BD)

October 7, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

National Family Care Life Insurance Company (“NFC”) appeals

the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Canadian Imperial

Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) on the grounds that the trial court erred

in holding the “holder in due course” defense applicable to actions

for conversion and money had and received.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties tried the case
-2-

before a United States Magistrate Judge. For the reasons set forth

in the magistrate’s final order, we AFFIRM the dismissal of NFC’s

claims. We find additional support for the magistrate’s ruling in

Texas Stadium Corp. v. Savings of America, 933 S.W.2d 616, 619 (Tx.

Ct. App. 1996, writ denied) (holding that final payment rule bars

common law causes of action for negligence, conversion, and money

had and received, where “payment or acceptance of any instrument is

final if made in favor of (1) a holder in due course or (2) a

person who has in good faith changed his position in reliance on

the payment”) (citations omitted).

AFFIRMED.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   August      14, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Jeffry E. Sterba    |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                        |   | Jeffry      E. Sterba        |
|                                        |   | Chairman,      President and |
|                                        |   | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                                        |   | PNM      Resources, Inc.     |
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert S. Yorgensen, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of STR Holdings, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: April 29,   2016 | /s/ ROBERT S. YORGENSEN |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                        | Name:                   | Robert S. Yorgensen |
|                        | Title:                  | *Chairman,   President and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

1

----
Exhibit 31.6



Certification



I, Stephen A. Lasota, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A
of Cowen Group, Inc.; and



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: April 29, 2016



| | /s/ Stephen A. Lasota                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Stephen A. Lasota                                             
| | Chief Financial Officer                                       
| | (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
Page 37.1.241
Page 37.1.242

 
 

 

 

Page 37.1.243

21 
Page 37.1.244

D W NICHOLSON CORP 

Page 37.1.246
Page 37.1.247
Page 37.1.248
 

 

Page 37.1.249

 

Page 37 1 251

DARLING INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Page 37.1.253

Page 37.1.255

1 
Page 37.1.256
Page 37.1.257

DESOTO CAB CO 

Page 37.1.259

Page 37.1.261

1 
 

 

Page 37.1.262

DIEGO TRUCK REPAIR, CO 

Page 37.1.264

 

Page 37.1.266

 



DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. 

Page 37.1.270
Page 37.1.271
Page 37.1.272
Page 37.1.273

 

EARTHGRAINS (LOCAL 2182, 04-05547080-14)

Page 37.1.275
Page 37.1.276
Page 37.1.277

EARTHGRAINS CO BIMBO BAK (LOCAL 1546, 04-05547165-02)

Page 37.1.279
Page 37.1.280
LIBERTY FLEET CARE 

Page 37.1.585
Page 37.1.586

 
 

Page 37.1.587
Page 37.1.588
Page 37.1.589

 

LIVERMORE SANITATION 

Page 37.1.591
Page 37.1.592
Page 37.1.593

 


LOOMIS, FARGO COMPANY 

Page 37.1.596
Page 37.1.597
Page 37.1.598

 
MACY AUTOMOTIVE, INC 

Page 37.1.599
Page 37.1.600
Page 37 1.601
Page 37.1.602
Page 37.1.603

 

MACY AUTOMOTIVE, INC 

Page 37.1.605
Page 37.1.606
Page 37 1.607
Page 37.1.608
Page 37.1.609

 

MAGNUSSEN’S TOYOTA OF PALO ALTO 

Page 37.1.611
Page 37.1.612
Page 37.1.613
Page 37.1.614

MAITA OLDSMOBILE 

Page 37.1.616
Page 37.1.617
Page 37.1.618
 

 

 

Page 37.1.619
## THECATI-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Gerald C. Mann AUSTXN.I~. TEXAH
AlT‘.RNyrY QKNLDKAL

Hon. Ralph Logan County Attorney TomGreen County San,Angelo, Texas April 20, 1939 (See O-638-A (Conference Opln. 307.3) ;' Opinion No. O-638 Re: Authority of Commllasloners Court to expend county funds for transportation of W.P.A. workers engaged ln drilU,ng, wells Dear 812-t andtesting the mineral contents of water in the county. <* With reference to your letter of April 10th .to hhioh.the above opinion ,numberhas been assigned, kindly be advised that same has received the attention of this Department as per your,request contained therein which reads: ,‘:

Wan the Commissioners’ Court legally expend co&y funds for transportation of WPA workers engaged ln drilling wells andtesting the mineral content of water ‘over the county--such work being supervised bythe Board of Mater Engineers with the purpose of preparing ‘a statistical map?” Article 5, Section 18 of the Constitutlion of Texas, creatlng the Commissioners’ Court, reads in part as follows:

I’D...The County Commissioners so chosen, with the county judge, as presiding officer, shall compose the oounty Commissioners1 Court, which shall exercise such powers andjurisdiction over all county business, as.is conferred by this Constitution andthe laws of the State, or as maybe hereafter prescribed.” TheCommissioners’ Court of a county is a areature of the Constitution under Article 5, Section 18, andits powers are limited and controlled by the Constitution andthe laws passed by the Legislature .--Commissioners’ Court of Madison County et al vs. Wallace et al--(Supreme Ct.) 15 SW2nd 535.

Weare unable to find any statutory authority,, expressed or implied, granting to the Commissioners ’ Court the power to expend county funds for the transportation of W.P,A. workers engaged in testing the mineral content of water throughout their respective counties. The fact that such work is supervised by the Board of Water Engineers would have noweight upon the question of whether or not the Commiss%ohers’ Court had such authority. There being no statutes onthe **sub** ject, such project in question would not comewithin the meaning ofHon. Ralph Logan, page 2 (O-638)

“county business” over which the Commissioners1 Court can exercise a general authority, in the absence of special powers specifidally conferred by the Constitution and laws of this State.--Bland vs. Orr, 90Tex. 492.

It Is therefore, 

### Commiseioners~ E the opinion of this Department that the

ourt Is unauthorized to expend county funds for transportation of W.P.A. workers engaged In drilling wells andtesting the mineral oontent of water over their respective counties. Very truly yours ATTORNEY

GF&XBAL

OFTEXAS By/s/ Wm.J. R. King Wm.J. R. King, Assistant ~APPROVEDt /s/ Gerald C. Mann BTTORHEY

GENERAL

OFT&X&S See Conf. Opin. 3073 WnIC: AWxwb

.
#### DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF HOLLYWOOD, INC., et al., Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES OF the STATE of Florida, DIVISION OF PLANNING & EVALUATION, et al., Appellees.

No. T-102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 3, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Bobby Gordon SHEFFIELD, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Erwin FLEET, Circuit Judge, Okaloosa County, Florida, Respondent.

No. HH-206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Woodburn S. Wesley, Jr. of Cotton & Wesley, Fort Walton Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Bobby Gordon Sheffield, filed herein a suggestion for writ of prohibition alleging violation of the “speedy trial rule”, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. We issued Rule Nisi to which respondent has filed his return. We have also carefully considered the briefs filed by able counsel. Petitioner relies heavily upon a recent case from this court, *State*v. *Ansley,*349 So.2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). A careful examination of that case reveals that we there only held that *mere silence alone*on the part of a defendant or his counsel at a proceeding in which trial date is set beyond the speedy trial period is not a waiver pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(d)(2)(i). In that case, immediately prior to stating our holding, we said:

> “The requirements of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(d)(2)(i), requiring that an extension or waiver of the speedy trial time be in writing and be signed in proper person or by counsel, by the party against whom the stipulation is sought to be enforced, have been modified considerably by judicial interpretation. Waiver has been found without the required writing *932where defense counsel orally stipulated to the delay in open court and where same was preserved for the record by certified transcript of the proceedings; or where there was either a passive or active acknowledgment on the part of the defense that a stipulation (in court or out, oral or written) had been entered into by which the parties agreed that the trial would be set beyond the speedy trial period; or where there was an acknowledgment by the court or one of the parties of a speedy trial issue followed by the defense’s acquiescence in a trial date set beyond the speedy trial period. *State v. Kelley,*322 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); *Stuart v. State,*339 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976); *State v. Earnest,*265 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972); and *Eastwood v. Hall,*258 So.2d 269 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1972). However, none of these circumstances has occurred in the instant case.” (349 So.2d 838, 839)

Respondent, on the other hand, heavily relies upon *State v. Kelley,*322 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) which, it will be noted from the above quotation, was cited and approved by us in *State v. Ansley,*supra. An examination of the facts of this case reveals them to be more analogous to those in *State v. Kelley*than in *State v. Ansley.*

Accordingly, our rule nisi is vacated and the petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Loncor Resources Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donat K Madilo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

	(2)	The information contained in this Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
    March28, 2013  /s/ Donat K. Madilo  
DonatK. Madilo

ChiefFinancial Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to Loncor Resources Inc. and will be retained by Loncor Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2641]


The Bureau of Consular Affairs; 60-Day Notice of Proposed 
Information Collection; Nonimmigrant Treaty Trader/Investor Visa 
Application (OF-156(E))

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement of a previously approved collection 
for which approval has expired.
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA).
    Title of Information Collection: Nonimmigrant Treaty Trader/
Investor Visa Application.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: OF-156 (E).
    Respondents: Aliens and enterprises that qualify for E-1 and E-2 
nonimmigrant visas for the purpose of carrying on their business 
enterprise in the United States.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 15,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 2 hours.
    Total Estimated Burden: 30,000 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Eliza McClenaghan,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30729 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to amend our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012 of Prospect Global Resources Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge and belief:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 22, 2013

 
| By:    | /s/   DAMON G. BARBER     |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Damon   Barber            |   |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer* |   |
|   |                      |   |
| By:    | /s/   GREGORY DANGLER     |   |
|   | Gregory   Dangler         |   |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of PMX Communities, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Timothy B. Shannon
                                 ----------------------
                                 Michael C. Hiler
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

May 3, 2010
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL



## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

Nos. 1D17

- 1396

1D17

- 1398

(Consolidated for disposition)

M ARGARET C ELESTE L UCAS

,

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA

,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

April 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.

We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for

the trial court to enter a nunc pro tunc order consistent with its

oral order adjudicating Appellant competent to proceed. See

Merriell v. State

, 169 So. 3d 1287, 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

J AY

, W INSOR

, and M.K. T HOMAS

, JJ., concur.Not final until disposition of any timely and

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin F. Karpf, Assistant

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven E. Woods, Assistant

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

2