alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George HORNE, Individually and on behalf of his minor children and the Jefferson Parish School Board v. LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION et al.

No. 62329.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: George Horne, Individually and on behalf of his minor children and the Jefferson Parish School Board Applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 357 So.2d 1216.

Denied.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Nasser Chehab, * From the 189th District Court

 of Harris County,

 Trial Court No. 2020-17699.

Vs. No. 11-20-00180-CV * June 16, 2022

William P. Huttenbach and Hirsch & * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. 

Westheimer, P.C., (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal are taxed against Nasser Chehab.
#### MELODY MOBILE HOMES, INC. v. Charles W. McMULLAN et al.

No. 49592.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 24, 1977.

Gipson, Gipson & Williamson, Champ C. Gipson, Meridian, for appellant.

Mr. and Mrs. Charles W. McMullan, pro se.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Lauderdale County; Howard R. Pigford, Chancellor.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Maufacturer of Controlled Substance; Notice of Registration

    By notice dated March 31, 1997, and published in the Federal 
Register on May 8, 1997, (62 FR 25209), Johnson Matthey, Inc., Custom 
Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 
08066, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Difenoxin (9168)...........................  I                          
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II                         
Dihydrocodeine (9120)......................  II                         
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II                         
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II                         
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II                         
Levorphanol (9220).........................  II                         
Meperidine (9230)..........................  II                         
Methadone (9250)...........................  II                         
Thebaine (9333)............................  II                         
Alfendanil (9737)..........................  II                         
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II                         
Carfentanil (9743).........................  II                         
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey, 
Inc. to manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with 
the public interest at this time. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 
and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office 
of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by 
the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic 
classes of controlled substances listed above is granted.

    Dated: October 24, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-29645 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
SWORCCPP-000182
SWORCCPP-000183


SWORCCPP-000186
SWORCCPP-000187
SWORCCPP-000188
SWORCCPP-000189
 

 

SWORCCPP-000190
SWORCCPP-000191
SWORCCPP-000192
 

 

SWORCCPP-000193
SWORCCPP-000194
SWORCCPP-000195
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000196
 

SWORCCPP-000197
SWORCCPP-000198
 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000199
SWORCCPP-000200
 

 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000201
SWORCCPP-000202
 

 

SWORCCPP-000203
SWORCCPP-000204
 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000205
SWORCCPP-000206
 

SWORCCPP-000207
 

 

SWORCCPP-000208
SWORCCPP-000209
SWORCCPP-000210
 

SWORCCPP-000211
 

SWORCCPP-000212
SWORCCPP-000213
 

 

SWORCCPP-000214
SWORCCPP-000215
SWORCCPP-000216
SWORCCPP-000217
SWORCCPP-000218
 

SWORCCPP-000219
SWORCCPP-000220
SWORCCPP-000221
SWORCCPP-000222
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000223
 

SWORCCPP-000224
 

SWORCCPP-000225
SWORCCPP-000226
 

SWORCCPP-000227
 

 

SWORCCPP-000228
 

 

SWORCCPP-000229
 

SWORCCPP-000230
SWORCCPP-000231
 

 

SWORCCPP-000232
 

 

SWORCCPP-000233
 

SWORCCPP-000234
 

SWORCCPP-000235
 

SWORCCPP-000236
 

SWORCCPP-000237
SWORCCPP-000238
 

SWORCCPP-000239
 

 

SWORCCPP-000240
SWORCCPP-000241
SWORCCPP-000242

SWORCCPP-000244
SWORCCPP-000245
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000246
SWORCCPP-000247
 

 

SWORCCPP-000248

 

SWORCCPP-000250
SWORCCPP-000251
 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000252
SWORCCPP-000253
SWORCCPP-000254
 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000255
 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000256
SWORCCPP-000257

 

SWORCCPP-000259
 

SWORCCPP-000260
SWORCCPP-000261
 

SWORCCPP-000262
 

SWORCCPP-000263
SWORCCPP-000264
SWORCCPP-000265
SWORCCPP-000266
SWORCCPP-000267
SWORCCPP-000268
 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000269
 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000270
 

SWORCCPP-000271
 

SWORCCPP-000272
 

SWORCCPP-000273
 

 

SWORCCPP-000274
 

 

SWORCCPP-000275
 

SWORCCPP-000276
 

SWORCCPP-000277
SWORCCPP-000278
 

SWORCCPP-000279
SWORCCPP-000280
 

SWORCCPP-000281
 

 

 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000282
SWORCCPP-000283
 

 

SWORCCPP-000284
 

 

SWORCCPP-000285
 

SWORCCPP-000286
 

SWORCCPP-000287
 

SWORCCPP-000288
 

SWORCCPP-000289
SWORCCPP-000290
SWORCCPP-000291
 

SWORCCPP-000292
SWORCCPP-000293
SWORCCPP-000294
 

 

SWORCCPP-000295
 

 

 

SWORCCPP-000296
SWORCCPP-000297
 

 

SWORCCPP-000298
SWORCCPP-000299
SWORCCPP-000300
 

SWORCCPP-000301
OFFlCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Xay 25, 1939 

Honorable T. P. Walker, Auditor 

Department of Education 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

we are in rroel 

wherein you nqgest our 

iag question: 

Wherein an eleot 

airied rot023 or 

ammoa eohool dispeadeat @ho01 dlaror the conreridrtlon or suOh 

ohool purpoeee, the County 

County Judge shell give notiee of 

the date of suoh elections by publioatlons or 

the order In eonm newspaper published ia the 

county for twenty (20) days prior to the date 

on which such elections are ordered, or by 

posting a notioe of euoh eleetione in saoh or 
Honorable T. E. ealker, My 25, 1939, page 2 

the districts, or by both such publication 

and posted notices . . . 

"C~LUQ~~ school districts may in like manner be consolidated with contiguous lndependent school districts, and thedistrict so 

created shall be known by the nane of the independent school district Included therein, 

and the mnageffient of the new district shall 

be under the existing board of trustees of 

the independent sohool district, and all the 

rights and privileges granted to independent 

distrlats by, the lam oi,th$s State #hall he 

given to the aonsolldato~:i0&pen6ont~6lstriat areated un&ew3&e.~j)Mrr?Ltiexm or t&l@ 

law; . . . . prodded furpi&! that whim it Su 

proposed to consolldate~i$&~oue comtT~'l%e 

districts the 

preeoribed in 

:.' .~.I “$; i 

We have no et&ate requiring that aajr..pcirt~. 

period or time ahall-interveaa between +ay 6uoh:eleFc 

Article ,2806 provldea.~ior the iesuanee ot cle 

. upon. the present+tlon of petlti+qneJ -signal .by 

majority or the 1egal.l.r qualS%e&we+ersiot 0 

terested dlatriots. wben.auoh ~titiens'as greperfir::~mseated, such eleatlons may be !%U.ed~uH+ottt reiexe&iei'te 

the lath or time that has pasaad31ino~ a prev+a s-ax? 

eleotl63i. .~. , 

.Yourt3 very truly 

Assistant 

TEXAS 

APPROVED 

OPINION.COLZIT!lXE 

N Rm 

Ch%lrlWUI
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Department of Energy

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA97-618-000]


Ohio Valley Electric Corporation Indiana-Kentucky Electric 
Corporation; Notice of Revision of Tariff

November 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 9, 1997, Ohio Valley Electric Corporation 
and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corporation 
(together, the ``OVEC System'') tendered for filed an amended version 
of their Open Access Transmission Tariff (the ``compliance Tariff'').
    As required by the Commission's Order No. 888-A, the Compliance 
Tariff incorporates changes to the OVEC System's Open Access 
Transmission Tariff filed with the Commission on July 9, 1996. The 
requested effective date of the Compliance Tariff is September 7, 1997, 
sixty (60) days after the date of the OVEC System's filing.
    Copies of the filing were served upon the OVEC System's 
jurisdictional customers and upon each state public service commission 
with retail rate jurisdiction over such customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 18, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this application are on file with 
the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29808 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Page 11.0

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Checklist Item #11

Does the application include the required illustration utilizing stochastic projections? (This 

illustration is not required if the plan is not required to appoint a retiree representative 

under section 432(e)(9)(B)(v)(I) and stochastic projections were not used in making the 

required determination.)

See section 4.02(2).

The application filed on behalf of the Automotive Industries Pension Plan includes an Actuarial 

Certification of Plan Solvency under ERISA Section 305(e)(9)(c)(i) and IRC Section 

432(e)(9)(C)(i). This certification is attached as Document No. 7.1 to Checklist Item #7. Exhibit 

V of the certification provides an illustration on a stochastic basis showing that under the 

proposed Suspension Plan effective July 1, 2017, the Plan is reasonably expected to avoid 

insolvency by more than 50% probability throughout the extended period through December 31,

2062.

Exhibit V of the certification is based on upon our interpretation of the requirements under 

Revenue Procedure 2016-27, Section 4.02(2).
BILLY COMER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1670

____________ _________________/

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Calhoun County

. Allen L. Register , Judge

.

Billy Comer

, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Edward Paul SHANNON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-31.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Criswell *versus*Altemus.

,,It is advisable that in a specification of error, the language of the charge, so far as it is complained of as erroneous, be stated. When the plaintiff in' error substitutes his own language, he does so at his peril.

Error to the Common Pleas of *Indiana county.*

This was an action of ejectment' by Nicholas Altemus *v.*Matthew Criswell, for above 164 acres of land, being the north end' of a certain tract, warranted in the name of William Morrell, and which Altemus, by articles of agreement, dated 4th April, 1840, agreed to sell to Criswell, and covenanted to convey in fee simple. The tract adjoined a tract of land surveyed in the name of Robert Hogg.

In March, -1842, Altemus tendered to Criswell a deed for the land agreed to be sold.

At the time of the contract, and till the trial of the case, *Andrew*Campbell, who resided on the survey in the name of Robert Hogg, was in possession of about.seven or eight acres of the northeast corner of the northern half of the Morrell survey, and, it was said, had acquired title to that much of it by the statute of limitations ; and the defendant claimed a deduction from the amount of the consideration mentioned in the article of agreement, on account of the quantity of land in; the occupancy of Campbell.

It was assigned as error, That the Court erred “in leaving it as a, question of fact to the jury to find whether that part of the William Morrell survey, which was in the possession of Andrew Campbell, was included in the contract between the parties.”

*125
      *White,*for plaintiff in error.

*Drum,*for the defendant, the Court declined to hear.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Lewis, J.

It is assigned for error that the Court left it “ as a question of fact for the jury, to find whether a part of the William Morrell survey, which was in the possession of Andrew Campbell, was included in the contract between the parties.” On examination of the charge it does not appear that the Court left any such fact to the jury; and the instruction which was given appears to be free from objection.

A specification of error should state the language of the charge, so far as it is complained of as erroneous. When the plaintiff in error substitutes his own language, he does so at his peril. A substantial mis-statement of the instruction is fatal, whether it be the result of accident or design. It is unfair to the Court below, and tends to mislead this Court, and ought therefore to be discouraged.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-166780) pertaining to the 1999 StockOption Plan, the 2002 Executive Stock Option Plan, and the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan of TeleNav, Inc. of our report dated September 24, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of TeleNav, Inc., included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Francisco, California 

September 24, 2010
#### Lawrence GRANT, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 73-378.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 6, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
No. 00-7253.

#### Keen *v.*Enstar Natural Gas Co.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CenterPoint Energy
Restoration Bond Company, LLC (the Exchange Act Periodic Reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the
Exchange Act Periodic Reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under
Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports,
the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the System Restoration Property Servicing
Agreement dated as of November 25, 2009 between CenterPoint Energy Restoration Bond Company,
LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer, in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included
as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.
  CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, as servicerBy:
    /s/ Marc KilbrideName:
    Marc KilbrideTitle:
    Vice President and Treasurer
254 La. 748

#### Lynwood HEBERT, Doris G. Rankin and Aline York v. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al.

No. 50125.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 24, 1969.

In re: East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, et al. applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

FOURNET, C. J., is of the opinion that this matter, being impressed with such public importance, warrants our immediate attention.

McCALEB and HAMLIN, JJ., concur, being of the view that applicants are attempting to secure an advisory opinion in a matter in which this Court is without supervisory jurisdiction as there is no adverse court order or rulings for us to supervise.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1876 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1876

 To amend the Uniform Time Act to make daylight savings time permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2021

 Mr. Cawthorn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Uniform Time Act to make daylight savings time permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SPF Act''.

SEC. 2. MAKE DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME PERMANENT.

    Section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260a(a)) is 
amended by striking ``During the period commencing at 2 o'clock 
antemeridian on the second Sunday of March of each year and ending at 2 
o'clock antemeridian on the first Sunday of November of each year'' and 
inserting ``Starting the first Sunday in November 2021 permanently 
advancing one hour and such time as so advanced shall for the purposes 
of such sections 261 to 264, as so modified, be the standard time of 
such zone during such period''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 12: Page 1 of 2 

WESTERN STATES OFFICE AND 

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND

SUSPENSION APPLICATION 

Exhibit 12
Western States Office and Professional Employees Pension Fund

Exhibit 12: Page 2 of 2 

Exhibit 12 

Application for Approval of Suspension of Benefits 

for the 

Western States Office and Professional Employees Pension Fund 

Information Regarding the Enrolled Actuary 

Name: Paul Graf

Enrollment Number: 14-05627

Company: Rael & Letson 

Address: 999 Third Avenue, Suite 1530 

Seattle, Washington 98104 

Phone: (206) 445-1852 

Fax: (206) 445-1840 

E-Mail: paulg@rael-letson.com
254 La. 927

#### James C. McDONALD v. Honorable Harry ANDERS, Judge, Fifth Judicial District of Louisiana, Parish of Richland, et al.

No. 50246.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 11, 1969.

In re: James C. McDonald applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of either our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

I concur in the refusal of writs on the ground, however, that the application does not conform with the rules of this Court.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32472

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Richard J. NOEL, Jr.

Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 23 March 2018

________________________

Military Judge: Brendon K. Tukey.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 11 May 2017 by 

SPCM convened at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona.

For Appellant: Captain Dustin J. Weisman, USAF.

For Appellee: Major Mary Ellen Payne, USAF.

Before JOHNSON, MINK, and DENNIS, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 

59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 
United States v. Noel, No. ACM S32472

2

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Hydroelectric Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Tie Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)

Date: April 4, 2011

|By: |  | /s/ JAMES TIELI
    
    Name: James Tie LiTitle: Chief Financial Officer
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
33.1

Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local No. 7 Pension Plan

Checklist Item #33

Does the application include the required retiree representative information (if applicable)? See 

section 7.03.

Document 33.1 discusses whether the Pension Plan is required to provide retiree representative 

information.
33.2

7.03 Retiree Representative Information

Document 33.1

Retiree Representative Information

Not applicable. The Pension Plan is not required to provide retiree representative 

information in this proposal