alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local No. 7 Pension Plan 

Checklist Item #26 

Does the application describe the plan's experience for cettain critical assumptions. including a 

disclosure for each of the ten (I 0) plan years immediately preceding the application that separately 

identifies: 

• total contributions; 

• total contribution hase units; 

• average contribution rates; 

• withdrawal liability payments; and 

• the rate of return on plan assets'! 

Sec section 6.03. 

Document 26. 1 describes the l'ension Plan's experience for certain critical assumptions with 

respect to the above-listed factors. 

26.1 
6.03 Ten-Vent· Experience for Certain Critical Assumptions 

Document 26.1 

Pension Plan's Ten-Y car Experience for Certain Critical Assumptions 

See the fbllowing page. 

26.2 
6.03 Ten-Year Experience for Ccrtnin Co·itic:tl As\umptions 

Bricklnyers & Alli~d Crufbmcn l.ocul i\o. 7 Pension Plan 

onttibutiM~ 

- · Ycnr Base Average 

Ending Units Hourly 

4!30 Total (Hours) Rate 

2006 $826,886 230.846 S3.58 

2007 $736,090 204,55 1 $3.60 

200R $657,050 155,l!75 S-1.22 

2009 $646,285 13ll,499 S-1.67 

20 10 $815,526 163.420 $4.99 

20 11 $74 1 '199 137.302 $5.40 

20 12 $86 1,825 154,904 $5.56 

20 13 $761,064 123283 $6.15 

201 4 $672,704 101 ,99-1 S6.60 

2() 15 $934,649 144})77 S6.49 

2016• $895,158 134,401> S6.66 

--

Withdrawal 

Liability 

Pu)11H:nts 

so 

so 

$() 

so 

so 

so 

so 

so 

$0 

so 

so 

"' h.stmwtf'd based on dr'!/l.flnancwl slo/cmcnls tis of Apn/30. 2016. 

26.3 

Return on 

/ \ SSCLS 

(Market Oasis ) 

10.97% 

10.45% 

-2.69% 

-24.6ll% 

29.68% 

14.16% 

0.71% 

8.65% 

8.27% 

6.72% 

-3.45%
Exhibit 10.1

 

2018 CASH INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Purpose:

 

The terms of the 2018 Cash Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) have been established to reward the executives and other employees of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for assisting the Company in achieving its operational goals through exemplary performance. Under the Plan, cash bonuses, if any, will be based on both the achievement of corporate goals and a review of personal performance, which is determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) and/or the Board of Directors (the “Board”).  The overarching intent in setting and achieving the goals is to build long-term shareholder value.

 

Determination of 2018 Cash Bonuses:

 

Target bonuses for participants in the Plan will range from 5% to 60% of such recipient’s 2018 base salary, with a range for executives of 40% to 60% of such executive’s 2018 base salary. The maximum bonus that a participant will be eligible to receive is 120% of such participant’s 2018 base salary and in no event will a bonus be paid later than March 15 of the year following the year in which the bonus was earned. The objective Company performance goals for each participant will be based on meeting certain goals with respect to the Company’s financial and operational performance: launching of and achieving product uptake for fostamatinib (weighted at 60%), advancing fostamatinib for use in other indications, such as AIHA (weighted at 15%), expanding the Company’s pipeline (weighted at 10%), expanding available markets for fostamatinib and maintaining a viable cash position for the Company at December 31, 2018 (weighted at 15%), as well as other Company performance goals to be determined by the Compensation Committee. The Board and Compensation Committee reserve the right to modify these goals and criteria at any time or to grant bonuses to the participants even if the performance goals are not met, as well as to withhold bonuses if a minimum threshold of 40% of the goals are not met.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         136,855
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  225,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               557,445
<PP&E>                                         194,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                 132,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 759,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,310
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       871,286
<OTHER-SE>                                   (312,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   759,074
<SALES>                                      1,103,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,103,760
<CGS>                                          583,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,062,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,674
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
01/07/201 0 12:45 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 21001/00 2 

KtCEfVEC 

Um-ORE THE UNITED STATF S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPaRlSlofp ^-^OCKirT 

IN THE MATTER OF ) I'AA Investigation No.: 2008SO700215 

) FAA Docket No.: CPSOOOl 0 

SOUTHWEST AIRFRAME AND TANK ) DMS No. FAA-2009-0723 

SERVICES, ) The Honorable Judge Isaac I). Benkin 

Rcspondcni.) 

) ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

) 

) 

The Respondent, SOUTHWEST AIRFRAME AND TANK SERVICES, 

respectfully answers the Amended Complaint (served December 11, 2009) In the 

above-captioned matter. 

1. Section I, Paragraph 1 Is admitted. 

2. Section II, Paragraph 1 is denied. 

3. Section II, Paragraph 2 is denied. 

4. Section II. Paragraph 3 is denied In that the Respondent is without 

sufficient knowledge or information. 

5. Section II, Paragraph 4 is admitted. 

6. Section II, Paragraph 5 is denied in that the Respondent is without 

sufficient knowledge or information and further in that Complainant 

has failed to make the evidence in this case available. 

7. Section II, Paragraph 6 is denied in that the Respondent is without 

sufficient knowledge or information and further in that Complainant 

has failed to make the evidence in this case available. 

8. Section II, Paragraph 7(a)(1) is admitted, 

9. Section II, Paragraph 7(a)(2) is admitted. 

10. Section II, Paragraph 7(b)(1) is admitted. 

SOIJTHWES r AIRl'RAMC AND TANK'S ANSWER WashingLon Avitiiion Group, PC luid liie 

10 AMliNDED COMPLAINT Law Offices of Jason A. Dicksfein 

Page I 2233 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, SiiilC 503 

Washinfiion. DC 20007 -Tel; 202-628-8947 

L—' 
01/07/201 0 12;45 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 0002/00 2 

11.Section II, Paragraph 7(b)(2) is admitted. 

12.Section II, Paragraph 8 Is denied. 

13. Section II, Paragraph 9 is denied. 

14.Section II, Paragraph 10 is denied. 

15.Section II, Paragraph 11 Is denied. 

16.Section II, Paragraph 12 is denied. 

17. Section II, Paragraph 13 Is denied. 

18. Section II, Paragraph 14 is denied. 

19.Section II, Paragraph 15 Is denied. 

20. Section II, Paragraph 16 is denied. 

21. Section II, Paragraph 17 is denied. 

22.The legal conclusions of Part III of the Complaint are denied. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 17* day of December, 2009. 

WASHINGTON AVIATION GROUP, PC AND THE 

LAW OFFICES OF JASON A DICKSTEIN 

Jason Dickstein 

Washington Aviation Group, PC and the 

Law Offices of Jason A. Dickstein 

2233 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 503 

Washington, DC 20007 

Tel: (202) 628-6776 

Fax: (202) 628-8948 

Attorney for Respondent 

sournwF.ST AIRFRAME AND PANK'S ANSWKR 

10 AMLNDLD COMPLAIN 1 

Page 2 

Washington Aviation Group, PC and the 

Law Offices of Jason A. Dickstein 

2233 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 503 

Washingron, DC 20007 . Tel: 202-628-8947
#### GREYHOUND LINES, INC., GREYHOUND LINES-EAST DIVISION, Petitioner, v. Jess YARBOROUGH et al., Respondents.

No. 42471.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 9, 1973.

John H. Wilbur, of Milam, Martin & Ade, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

James L. Armstrong, III, Miami, for in-tervenor.

Prentice P. Pruitt and M. Robert Christ, Florida Public Service Commission, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review Order No. 10075 of the Florida Public Service Commission, dated May 16, 1972.

After oral argument and upon consideration of the petition, the briefs, and the record, we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

McCAIN, J-, dissents.
# C_2005099EN.01000301.xml

| 23.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3716 — AS Watson/Marionnaud)

(2005/C 99/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3716. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3716. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cobalt International Energy, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John P. Wilkirson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 1, 2011   /s/   John P. WilkirsonJohn   P. WilkirsonChief   Financial Officer and Executive Vice President  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cobalt International Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Cobalt International Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit
Floorplan Master Owner Trust A (Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act period reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and
based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Michael L. SeneskiMichael L. SeneskiVice President and Assistant Treasurer
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer
(senior officer in charge of servicing
function)
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comarco, Inc., I, Daniel R. Lutz,
Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel R. Lutz     
|                    |  |  |  | Daniel R. Lutz         
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41300

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO MARTINEZ-CANIZALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-03-CR-400-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Martinez-Canizales appeals his guilty plea

conviction for knowingly importing into the United States more

than five kilograms of cocaine. He argues that 21 U.S.C. §§ 841,

846, 952, and 960 were rendered facially unconstitutional by

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). MartinezCanizales concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our opinion

in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 581-82 (5th Cir.
No. 03-41300

-2-

2000). He raises the issue only to preserve it for Supreme Court

review. 

A panel of this court cannot overrule a prior panel’s

decision in the absence of an intervening contrary or superseding

decision by this court sitting en banc or by the United States

Supreme Court. Burge v. Parish of St. Tammany, 187 F.3d 452, 466

(5th Cir. 1999). No such decision overruling Slaughter exists. 

Accordingly, Martinez-Canizales’s argument is foreclosed, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
“SERVICE PROVIDER”	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Charles Day 	 
	Name:	Charles
    Day	 
	Title: 	President,
    Sharper, Inc.	 


 


“PNPL”


 


Pineapple Express, Inc.


A California Corporation


 


/s/ Matthew Feinstein


 



 


	By:	/s/
    Matthew Feinstein 	 
	Name:	Matthew
    Feinstein	 
	Title: 	CEO
    and President
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N fuHcH T O r WASHINGTON , D.C . ^ •^MR-OnTAijO; ; Ninet y Da y Notic e o f Colga n Airlines , Inc . o f terminatio n o

f Essentia l Ai r Servic e a t Victoria , Texa s Pursuan t t o 1 4 C . F . R . Par

t 32 3 i 7 > ! • L ) _ Q A '''^' 

### Doclce t DOT-OST-2005-2045 4

NINETY-DAY NOTIC E O F TERMINATIO N O F SERVIC E Communication s wit

h respect t o thi s documen

t shoul db e addres s to : D . Philip Reed , Jr . Vice Presiden

t Networ k Scheduling , Operationa

l Analytic s an

dPerformanc e Engineerin g PINNACL E AIRLINE S CORP . On e Commerc e Square , 9" " Floor 4 0 S . Mai n Street Memphis , T

N 3810 3 (901 ) 348-425 7 preed@pnci.com Dated : Marc h 08,201 2BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C . Ninet y Day Notic e o f Colga n Airlines , Inc . o f terminatio n o f

Essentia l Ai r

Servic e a t Victoria , Texas Pursuan t t o 1 4 C . F . R . Par

t 32 3 Docke t DOT-OST-2005-2045 4

NINETY-DA Y NOTIC E O F TERMINATIO N O F SERVIC E Pursuan t t o Par t 32 3 o f th e Departmen

t o f Transportation' s Regulation s (1 4 C.F.R . Par t 323) , Colga n Airlines , Inc . hereby give s notic e o f its inten t t o discontinu e the servic e i

t provide s a

t Staunton , V A (SHD) , effective June 08 , 2012 . Colga n Airlines , Inc . ca

n no longe r continu e servic e t

o th e community . The discontinuatio n o f servic e wil l caus e servic e t

o dro p below the EA

S guarante e level s establishe db y the Department . Colga

n Airlines , Inc . operate s a s UnitedAirline s Express , 1 3 weekl y non-stop roundtrip s betwee n Victoria , T

X (VCT ) an dGeorge Bus

h Intercontinenta

l (lAH ) wit

h 3 4 sea t Saa b Turbo-Pro

p aircraft . Curren

t schedule s includin g routes , arriva

l an ddepartur e times , equipmen

t types , an doperatin g carrier(s ) ar

e a s follows : Colga n Airlines , Inc . OperatedServic e 

## vc r Marketin g Airlin e U A UA UA U A U A Operatin g

Airlin e 9 L 9 L 9 L 9 L 9 L Victori a

T X

Or g lA H 

## vc r lA H 

## vc r vc r Ds t

VC T lA H VC T lA H lA H Eqp t

SF 3 SF 3 SF 3 SF 3 SF 3 Seat s

3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 Respectfull y Submitted , D . Phili p Reed ,

^ ^ < ^ ^ Jr . 

# -7 , De p

Tim e 153 0 164 0 213 0 052 5 064 8

f An

Tim e 162 5 MA I 223 0 063 0 080 0 O p

Day s 12345. 7 12345. 7 123456 7 12345. . 6 7

D . Philip^^ . Jr . Vice-Pre ^ Networ k Scheduling , Operationa

l Armlytic s & PerfoiTnanc

e Engineering PINNACL E AIRLINES . COR

RCERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

A copy o f the foregoing Ninety-Da

y Notic e o f Termination o

f Servic e ha s bee

n servedthi s 8 * da

y o f Marc h 2012 , upo

n th e followin

g person s viaFedera

l Express : U.S . Posta l Servic e ATTN : Assistan

t Genera l Counsel , Transportatio n 47 5 L'Enfan

t Plaz aS.W , Washington , D.C . 2026 0 The Honorable Wil

l Armstrong Jason Milewsk i Mayo r Airpor t Manage r Cit y Hal l Victori aRegiona l Airpor t Authorit y 10 5 W . Jua n Lin n Street 60 9 Foste r FieldDrive , Suit

e F Victoria , T X 7790 1 Victoria , T X 7790 4
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

December 15, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-61077

Summary Calendar

JAGDEEP SINGH,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

-----------------------------------------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78-177-763

----------------------------------------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS AND STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jagdeep Singh petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

affirming the immigrat io n judge’s decision to deny his application for asylum and withholding of

removal under both the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Convention Against Torture

(CAT). Singh argues that the BIA erred in determining that he had not established past persecution-2-

based on his religion and political opinions, a well founded fear of future persecution, or that it was

more likely than not that he would be tortured if he were returned to India.

This court will uphold the factual findings that an alien is not eligible for asylum or

withholding of removal if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. C hun v. INS

, 40 F.3d

76, 78-79 (5th Cir. 1994). The substantial evidence standard requires that the decision be based on

the evidence presented and that the decision be substantially reasonable. C arbajal-Gonzalez v. INS

,

78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The BIA’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, and the

record does not compel a contrary conclusion as to either Singh’s INA claims or his CAT claim. See

id. Accordingly, Singh’s petition for review is DENIED.
SMW0158

SMW0159

SMW0160
255 La. 278

#### Gerene MOORE et al. v. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al.

No. 50295.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 6, 1970.

In re: Gerene Moore and Norman W. Reisig, Jr. applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Martin. 228 So.2d 205.

Writ refused. The result is correct.