alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          90,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,158
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,682
<PP&E>                                          10,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,889
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,846
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (112)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,012
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,109
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        

</TABLE>
#### SONNENBLICK-GOLDMAN OF MIAMI CORP., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Irving R. FELDMAN, Respondent.

Nos. 42890, 42893.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 21, 1972.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2149 

LT Case No. 2013-CF-0957

_____________________________

JOSEPH LUIS LEVIN, 

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. 

James Daniel, Judge. 

Joseph Luis Levin, Monticello, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee.

October 24, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-1-012]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel) tendered for filing a corrected tariff 
sheet as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, to 
be effective November 1, 1997.
    National Fuel states that it is filing a corrected tariff sheet 
reserving Sheet Nos. 478 through 674, in compliance with the Letter 
Order issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission October 27, 
1997, in Docket No. RP97-1-010.
    National Fuel further states that it is serving copies of this 
filing upon its firm customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person to protest said filing should file a protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29544 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Beverly BORING, Appellant, v. Robert BORING, Appellee.

No. 73-158.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.4





Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of R1 RCM Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Christopher Ricaurte, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 1, 2017


/s/ Christopher Ricaurte


Christopher Ricaurte


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Hubert et al. *v.*Kessler, Trustee.

*Contracts—Commission for sale of real estate—Written agreement modified orally—Errors in submission of other issues —General verdict controls, when.*

(No. 17761

Decided May 29, 1923.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Lucas county.

*Mr. Alonzo G. Duer,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Karl A. FlicMnger,*for defendant in error.

The court finds in this case, from the record that several issues of fact were presented in the pleadings for the determination of the jury. The plaintiffs claimed recovery upon an alleged agreement for real estate commission based on a written contract, which the plaintiffs claimed had been modified orally by the parties. The establishment of this modification was necessary to sustain plaintiffs’ claim for recovery. The defendant denied that the written contract had been modified as claimed by the plaintiffs.

Certain errors appear upon the record with regard to the admission of testimony and to the charge of the court thereon, but upon the issue of the modification of the contract the record is entirely free from error.

As the verdict returned by the jury is a general verdict and it is not disclosed by answer to interrogatories or otherwise upon which issue the ver*585diet was based, it is not affirmatively shown that the errors existing in the record influenced the verdict. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.21





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have issued our report dated March28, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of American Realty Capital New York Recovery REIT, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Post-effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement and Prospectus of American Realty Capital New York Recovery REIT, Inc. on Form S-11 (File No. 333-163069).





/s/ Grant Thornton LLP





Philadelphia, Pennsylvania





March 28, 2011
Exhibit 32





Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the “Act”) and Rule 15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), each of the undersigned, Renee Gilmore, Principal Executive Officer of Firemans Contractors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Nikolay Frolov, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: October 1, 2012


By:
/s/ Renee GilmoreRenee GilmorePrincipal Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)By:
/s/ Nikolay FrolovNikolay FrolovChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Allie N. DUKES, Petitioner, v. Stephen L. DUKES, Sadie Dukes, and Barbara A. Albritton, Respondents.

No. 50439.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 3, 1977.

Ronald H. Cole and Frank M. Gafford, Lake City, for petitioner.

Martin S. Page, of Darby, Peele, Page & Bowdoin, and Marlin M. Feagle, Lake City, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. The Writ was issued, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and KARL, JJ., dissent.
Page 35.0 

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Checklist Item #35

Does the application include a designation of power of attorney for each authorized 

representative who will represent the plan sponsor in connection with the application?

See section 7.05 and Appendix B.

Yes. The power of attorney is attached as Document No. 35.1.
Page 35.1.1

Document No. 35.1

Section 7.05 and Appendix B. Designation of Power of Attorney for Authorized Representative

POWER OF ATTORNEY AND DECLARATION OF REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Applicant Information:

Plan Name: Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Plan Address: ATPA

1640 South Loop Road

Alameda, CA 94502

Plan Number: 001

EIN: 94-1133245

Plan Contact: Michael Schumacher, Fund Manager

Telephone: 510-836-2484

Email: mschumacher@atpa.com

Fax: 510-337-3060

Applicant hereby appoints the following representative as attorney-in-fact to represent the taxpayer 

before the Department of the Treasury and perform acts related to the attached application dated 

September 27, 2016 for suspension of benefits under section 432(e)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

1986, as amended.

Representative Information:

Name: Kimberly Hancock, Esq.

Address: Saltzman & Johnson

44 Montgomery St., Suite 2110

San Francisco, CA 94104

EIN: 94-2376174

Phone Number: (415) 882-7900

Fax Number: (415) 882-9287

Email: khancock@sjlawcorp.com
Send copies of notices and communications to representative: Yes 

With the exception of the acts described below, I authorize my representative to receive and inspect my 

confidential tax information and to perform acts that I can perform with respect to the attached 

application dated September 27, 2016, for suspension of benefits under section 432(e)(9). For example, 

my representative shall have the authority to sign any agreements, consents, or similar documents. 

Specific acts not authorized: None 

f Applicant and Date: 

James H. Beno, Chairman 

Authorized Trustee on behalf of the 

Board of Trustees of the Automotive 

Industries Pension Plan 

Declaration of Representative 

Date 

Under penalties of perjury, by my signature below I declare that: 

• I am not currently suspended or disbarred from practice before the Internal Revenue Service; 

• I am authorized to represent the Applicant for the matter(s) specified in this Power of Attorney 

and Declaration of Representative; and 

• I am an attorney and a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of the 

jurisdiction shown below. 

Jurisdiction of License: 

Bar Number: 

California 

205567 

Signature of Representative and Date: 

Kimberly Hancock Date 

Page 35.1.2 

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03728

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

03728\03728_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03728\03728_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03728\03728_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03728\03728_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03728\03728_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03728\03728_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03728\03728_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03728\03728_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03728\03728_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL C3-29.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL D2-3 Ash Pond Retention Time Study.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL D2-3 Whole Effluent Toxicity Management Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL D3-1 D-1 and D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03728\Supporting Documents\03728_WPL's Response to EPA ICR_WPL_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


California Coast Province Advisory Committee (PAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The California Coast Province Advisory Committee (PAC) will 
meet on December 3 and 4, 1997, at the Brook Trails Fire Department 
meeting room in Willits, CA. The meeting will be held from 10:00 a.m. 
to 5:30 p.m. on December 3, and from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on December 
4. The Brook Trails Fire Department is located at 24860 Birch Street in 
Willits. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Coho Salmon 
Subcommittee recommendation on road stream crossings; (2) Presentation 
on Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC)/PAC relations; (3) US 
Fish and Wildlife Service presentation on baseline analysis/current 
conditions of the northern spotted owl in the four northern California 
National Forests; (4) Recreation/Tourism Subcommittee report; (5) Panel 
presentation on Native American perspectives on prescribed burning and 
fuels management; (6) Public/Private/Tribal Partnership Opportunities 
Subcommittee reports to include Fork Fire recommendations, Forest 
Highway 7 update, grazing and Jobs in the Woods proposals; (7) 
Monitoring Subcommittee report on findings on watershed analyses; (8) 
Presentation on Pacific Southwest Research fuels research proposal; (9) 
Report and recommendations from the PAC/SCERT coordinating committee; 
(10) Presentation on how changes related to implementation of the 
Northwest Forest Plan affect Forest Service payments in lieu of taxes 
to Counties; (11) Presentation on the Effectiveness Monitoring 
Protocol; (12) Work on the Ground Subcommittee reports to include 
federal agencies' fuels planning, Threatened and Endangered Species 
consultations, and future subcommittee topics; and (13) Open public 
forum. All California Coast Province Advisory Committee meetings are 
open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Daniel Chisholm, USDA, 
Forest Supervisor, Mendocino National Forest, 825 N. Humboldt Avenue, 
Willows, CA 95988, (530) 934-3316 or Phebe Brown, Province Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, 825 N. Humboldt Avenue, Willows, CA 
95988, (530) 934-3316.

    Dated: November 14, 1997.
Arthur Quintana,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 97-30960 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-FK-M
257 La. 272

#### STATE of Louisiana v. L. E. DeBATE, Jr.

No. 51050.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 5, 1971.

In re: L. E. DeBate, Jr., applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Application refused. There are no perfected Bills of Exceptions in the record herein. See State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606, and authorities cited.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should not be considered. See reasons assigned, in State v. Normand, No. 51,049 on the docket of this Court, 257 La. 270, 242 So.2d 245.

TATE, J., concurs in BARHAM, J.’s reasons for not considering the application.
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Mario Jakiri Tolentino, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Online Tele-Solutions, Inc. for the
year ended January 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Online
Tele-Solutions, Inc.


                                   By: /s/ Mario Jakiri Tolentino
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Mario Jakiri Tolentino, President,
                                       Treasurer and Director
                                       Principal Executive and Financial Officer

Dated: May 15, 2012

This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that Online Tele-Solutions, Inc. specifically
incorporates it by reference.
#### Cohen *v.*Goldberger et al. Cramer *v.*Kramer *&*Bettman et al.

*Supreme Court—Jurisdiction in error—Cases originating in Court of Appeals—Section*2, *Article TV, Constitution—Issues raised in Court of Appeals after judgment by Supreme Court—Final order—Adjudication of fund in partnership accounting.*

(No. 17707

Decided June 19, 1923.)

Ebeob to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

On Motion to dismiss petition in error.

*Mr. Julius B. Samuels*and *Mr. S. A. Headley,*for plaintiff in error Nelson B. Cramer..

*Messrs. Cobb, Howard & Bailey*and *Messrs Kramer & Bettmom,*for defendants in error.

By the Court.

The question presented upon motion to dismiss the petition in error, filed as of right, arises from the case of *Morgenthaler*v. *Cohen,*103 Ohio St., 328, 132 N. E., 730, wherein this court affirmed a judgment theretofore rendered by the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county, in a suit brought for accounting of partnership funds. An issue was subsequently made in the Court of Appeals, wherein the conflicting claims of intervening petitioners were presented and determined by that court; the amount of the judgment having theretofore been paid by order of the Court of Appeals to the clerk thereof. This issue arose in the Court of Appeals, and, unless *244a very narrow and restricted definition of the word “case” is applied, it must he held that this petition in error is filed here as a matter of right under the provisions of Section 2, Article IV, of the state Constitution, defining the jurisdiction of this court, wherein it is provided that “it shall have * * * appellate jurisdiction * * * in eases which originated in the Courts of Appeals.” So far as these contending parties are concerned, it is clear that this case originated in the Court of Appeals. It could not have originated elsewhere.

A similar holding has heretofore been announced by this court in several cases, among which are *Globe-Wernicke Co.*v. *Safe-Cabinet Co.,*98 Ohio St., 447, 121 N. E., 901, and *Board of Com’rs of Greene County*v. Harshman, 101 Ohio St., 529, 130 N. E., 935, also reported in 102 Ohio St., 452, 132 N. E., 925, both of which cases involve contempt proceedings growing out of judgments in the Court of Appeals, which had come to that court from the court of common pleas.

The action of the Court of Appeals sought to be reversed determines the rights of the parties to the controversy in and to the fund in question, and therefore was a final order. *Chandler & Taylor Co.*v. *Southern Pacific Co.,*104 Ohio St., 188, 135 N. E., 620.

The motion to dismiss the petition in error is overruled.

*Motion overruled.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2


                   CONSENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CONSULTANT



         I consent to the use of my report  respecting the estimated oil reserve
information  as of December  31,  2001,  for the  Montana  and Nevada  producing
properties of FX Energy, Inc. (the "Company"), and the discussion of such report
as  contained  in the  Company's  annual  report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001 and to the  incorporation by reference of such report as it is
referred to in the Company's  annual report into the  registration  statement on
Form S-1 (SEC File No.  333-40480)  and the  registration  statement on Form S-3
(SEC File No. 333-80489).

/s/ Larry D. Krause

Larry D. Krause
Billings, Montana
April 12, 2002