alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of income and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000021212
<NAME> COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,361
<SECURITIES>                                    32,167
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,135
<INVENTORY>                                     95,322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,992
<PP&E>                                         109,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 295,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,875
<BONDS>                                          8,966
<COMMON>                                        56,606
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   295,851
<SALES>                                        211,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,025
<CGS>                                          183,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (248)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   345
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,729
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,512
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,217
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,217
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-2-000]


Algonquin LNG, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

November 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, Algonquin LNG, Inc. (ALNG), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, Seventh Revised Sheet No. 200. The proposed effective 
date of this tariff sheet is December 1, 1997.
    ALNG states that the purpose of this filing is to update and 
correct its Index of customers as of December 1, 1997.
    ALNG states that copies of its filing have been served on all firm 
customers of Algonquin LNG and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29541 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William J. Catacosinos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company







/s/ William J. Catacosinos





William J. Catacosinos
Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2002
#### Manning SMITH, Individually and as parent and natural guardian of Stephen A. Smith, a minor, Appellant, v. James REEVES, Allstate Insurance Company, and the National Cash Register Company, a Foreign Corporation, Appellees.

No. 76-1922.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 1977.

*725Richard D. Heller and Mark R. Boyd of Gerald M. Walsh & Associates, Fort Laud-erdale, for appellant.

Samuel Tyler Hill of Hinckley & Shores, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal a final order dismissing counts three and four of their amended complaint against the defendant, National Cash Register Company.

A brief history of this lawsuit will aid in understanding its present status. A minor was injured when the motorcycle on which he was a passenger collided with an automobile. The boy and his father sued James Reeves, the driver of the automobile, and also National Cash Register Company, Mr. Reeves’ employer. Counts one and two are against both defendants and allege that Reeves was negligent and that National was vicariously liable as his employer and co-owner of the automobile. Counts three and four, on the other hand, are against National alone and allege causes of action that are distinct from the first two counts. The trial court initially dismissed counts three and four; on appeal we reversed, holding that while these counts assert a somewhat novel theory of liability they do state causes of action. *Smith v. Reeves,*320 So.2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

While the first appeal was in progress, National obtained a summary final judgment in its favor as to counts one and two. The plaintiffs did not appeal the summary judgment. While their first appeal was still pending, the plaintiffs proceeded to trial against Reeves and obtained judgment against him on counts one and two. After our reinstatement of counts three and four, National again moved to dismiss these counts, this time on the grounds that the plaintiffs were estopped by their failure to appeal the summary judgment and that any cause of action arising out of this accident is now res judicata as to National. The trial court granted the motion, again dismissing counts three and four, thereby precipitating this second appeal.

We reverse. In the first appeal we determined that counts three and four were distinct from the rest of the complaint. We now hold that neither the summary judgment in favor of National on the first two counts, nor the trial on these counts, which determined Reeves’ liability, settled the other distinct causes of action alleged against National. Accordingly, the order dismissing counts three and four is reversed with directions to reinstate these counts.

REVERSED with directions.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.10


 


FORM OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
CUSTODY AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into
as of this [    ] day of [           ], 2018 by and between ETF MANAGERS GROUP COMMODITY TRUST I, a Delaware statutory trust (the
“Trust”), ETF MANAGERS CAPITAL LLC, the sponsor of the Trust (“Sponsor”) and U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America (the “Custodian”).


 


WHEREAS, the Trust is authorized to issue
shares of beneficial interest in separate series, with each such series representing interests in a separate portfolio of securities
and other assets;


 


WHEREAS, the Custodian is a national banking
association which provides custodian services; and


 


WHEREAS, the Trust, the Sponsor and the
Custodian have entered into an agreement dated January 2, 2015 (the "Agreement") whereby the Custodian has agreed to
act as custodian of the cash and securities of each series of the Trust listed on Exhibit A (as amended from time to time)
(each a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend Exhibit
A of the Agreement to include a new separate series of the Trust, the Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
promises and mutual covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, do hereby agree as follows:


 


Exhibit A is hereby amended to include the
following fund: Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment
to be executed by a duly authorized officer on one or more counterparts as of the date first above written.


 


ETF MANAGERS GROUP COMMODITY


TRUST I





	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:	 	 	 



 






     


     


    

 


U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION





	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:	 	 	 


 


ETF MANAGERS CAPITAL LLC





	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:
Exhibit 13.2



Certification



In connection with the Annual Report of Daqo New Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jimmy Y. Lai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                               
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Jimmy Y. Lai           
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name: Jimmy Y. Lai            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### John W. MORTON, Appellant, v. J. F. McCRACKEN, as Clerk of the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, and Richard E. Gerstein, as State Attorney of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Appellees.

No. 72-639.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

John W. Morton, in pro. per.

Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., Hubbard & Hickey, Coral Gables, for appellees.

*58Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, in proper person, has appealed a final judgment dismissing his alleged cause of action against the appellees. Our review of the record affirmatively shows that appellant’s complaint in the trial court failed to state a cause of action and that the judgment of which appellant complains was regularly entered.

Affirmed.
Exhibit (j)



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of DWS Advisor Funds on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") of our
report dated February 25, 2008 relating to the financial statements and
financial highlights which appears in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report to
Shareholders of Tax Free Money Fund Investment, which is also incorporated by
reference into the Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to
us under the headings "Financial Highlights", "Financial Statements" and
"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such Registration Statement.



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 10, 2008
Order entered De cember 21, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-22-01247-CV

IN RE ROBERT B. READ, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 366-81170-06

ORDER Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN
JUSTICE
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40254 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID KEITH SPIGNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas (6:95-CV-566)

______________________________________________

December 16, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

David Spigner, #03420-078, filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in

federal custody. To the extent that Spigner requires a certificate

of appealability to appeal the denial of his motion, it is GRANTED.2

With respect to Spigner’s claim that he received ineffective

assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to obtain to the

amount of crack cocaine attributed to him for sentencing purposes,

Spigner has not demonstrated any deficient performance on counsel’s

part. S trickland v. Washington

, 466 U.S. 668, 687-94 (1984). With

respect to the other cl aims of ineffective assistance of counsel

that Spigner raised for the first time on appeal, Spigner has not

established plain error. S ee Douglass v. United Servs. Auto.

Ass’n
, 79 F.3d 1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); United States

v. Calverley

, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc) (the

plain error standard), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).

This court has rejected equal protect ion challenges to the

constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines for crack offenses.

See United States v. Watson
, 953 F.2d 895, 897-98 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied , 504 U.S. 928 (1992).

Finally, we find Spigner’s Commerce Clause challenge to 21

U.S.C. § 860 is devoid of merit. See United States v. Lopez , 115

S. Ct. 1624, 1630 (1995); United States v. Gallo

, 927 F.2d 815, 823

(5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
#### WOMETCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. Joseph L. LUTS et al.

No. 62360.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Wometco Communications, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of St. Tammany. 357 So.2d 877.

Writ denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1173

YVONNE L. MURPHY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary, Department of

the Army,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-2243-CCB, CA-97-2264-CCB)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 27, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yvonne L. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her

motion for reconsideration of the district court's denial of her

motion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction, because the order is not appealable. This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither

a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.30

 

[FTSI LETTERHEAD]

 

June 15, 2017

 

Jennifer Keefe

Hand Delivered

 

Re: Retention Bonus

 

Dear Jennifer,

 

You contribute a great deal to the organization, and we know that you have been asked to take on additional responsibilities with the recent changes that have occurred.  I assure you that your contribution to this team is valued.  As such, it is a pleasure to offer you a retention bonus in the amount of $106,000.

 

The bonus will be payable on June 15, 2018.  To be eligible for the retention bonus, you must be an active full-time employee of the Company on the applicable bonus payment dates.

 

If you are terminated without cause or the Company completes a sale of a majority of its equity or substantially all of its assets, the retention bonus will be paid to you at that time provided that you sign FTSI’s Separation and Release Agreement.  If you tender your resignation or are terminated for cause, you will not be eligible for the retention bonus payable thereafter.

 

We need you engaged in the business at hand and comfortable that your employment status is secure. I hope that this plan allows you to continue focusing on accomplishing our goals.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

	
/s/ Michael Doss
    	
 
    
	
Michael Doss
    	
 
    
	
Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    


 

 

I agree to and accept the terms set forth in this letter.

 

	
/s/ Jennifer Keefe
    	
 
    	
6/19/17
    
	
Employee Signature
    	
 
    	
Date
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Domain Extremes Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Tang, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 30, 2016

 

 

_/s/ Stephen Tang________________

Stephen Tang

Treasurer

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Domain Extremes, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

** **
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10862

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PHILLIP MARVIN CANADA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CR-1-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Phillip Marvin Canada has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Canada has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 19, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 11-10862 Document: 00512146172 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2013
No. 11-10862

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 11-10862 Document: 00512146172 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2013
Exhibit (j)


              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
                             PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  consent  to  the  references  to  our  firm  under  the  caption  "Financial
Highlights"  in the DWS Blue Chip Fund's (the "Fund") Class A, Class B, Class C,
Class S, and Institutional Class Shares Prospectuses and "Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firms" and "Financial Statements" in the Fund's Class A, Class
B, Class C, Class S, and  Institutional  Class Shares  Statements  of Additional
Information,  and to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective  Amendment
Number 31 to the Registration  Statement (Form N-1A, No. 33-17777) of our report
dated December 21, 2007, on the financial statements and financial highlights of
the DWS Blue Chip Fund,  included in the Fund's  Annual Report dated October 31,
2007.


                                                     /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
January 24, 2008
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-2824MN

_____________

Chris Kapp, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Zumbrota Area Ambulance Association, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: March 2, 1998

Filed: March 4, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Chris Kapp appeals the district court's denial of Kapp's motion under Federal

Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal.

After careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court

did not abuse its discretion. See Metropolitan Fed. Bank v. W.R. Grace & Co., 999

F.2d 1257, 1259 (8th Cir. 1993). We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Sim LeBRANE, Individually and as the Administrator of his minor child, Charles Lebrane v. James LEWIS et al.

No. 53800.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: Sim LeBrane, Individually and as the Administrator of his minor child, Charles LeBrane applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 280 So.2d 572.