alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                   One Beacon Street
                                   Boston, MA 02108

                                   December 2, 2008


Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549



RE:      DWS California Tax-Free Income Fund and DWS New York Tax-Free Income
         Fund (the "Funds"), each a series of DWS State Tax-Free Income Series
         (the "Trust"); (Reg. Nos. 2-81549 and 811-3657)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Trust
hereby certifies that the form of Prospectuses and Statements of Additional
Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Funds pursuant to Rule
497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No. 45 to the Trust's
Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the "Amendment"), do not differ from those
contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent amendment to such
Registration Statement and was filed electronically on November 26, 2008.

Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (617) 295-2557.

                                  Very truly yours,


                                  /s/David A. Rozenson
                                  David A. Rozenson
                                  Director and Counsel
                                  Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.



cc:      Jose Del Real, Esq., Vedder Price
#### Eddie Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-87.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 30, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1



GOLUB CAPITAL BDC, INC.



PRIVACY POLICY



To Golub Capital BDC, Inc. Investors:



We take precautions to maintain the privacy
of personal information concerning our investors. These precautions include the adoption of certain procedures designed to maintain
and secure your nonpublic personal information from inappropriate disclosure to unaffiliated third parties. We are sending this
notice in accordance with applicable federal regulations. This notice applies to investors in Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (the “Company”).



What kind of personal information do we have about you
and where did we get it?



We collect nonpublic personal information
about you from the following sources:



| | • | Information
we may receive from you in subscription agreements or other related documents or forms; and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | • | Information
about your transactions with our affiliates and us.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------



How do we protect your personal information?



We do not disclose any nonpublic personal
information about our investors or former investors to anyone, except as permitted by law.



We restrict access to nonpublic personal
information about you to those employees and agents of GC Advisers LLC, its affiliates and unaffiliated third party service providers
(which may include a custodian, transfer agent or financial printer) who need to know that information in order to provide services
to you or to the Company. In that regard, we note that we maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply
with federal standards to safeguard your nonpublic personal information and which we believe is adequate to prevent unauthorized
disclosure of such information.



What do we do with personal information about our former
investors?



If an investor decides to no longer do
business with us, we will continue to follow this privacy policy with respect to the information we have in our possession about
such investor and his/her account.



If you have any questions concerning our
privacy policies, please contact our Chief Financial Officer, Ross Teune, at (312) 284-0111.
#### Edward CONNER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. FF-115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 17, 1977.

Michael M. Corin and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Raymond L. Marky and Michael H. Davidson, Asst. At-tys. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

Conner appeals from a probationary sentence following the trial court’s acceptance of his plea of nolo contendere to a charge of possession of marijuana, reserving Conner’s right on appeal to complain of the court’s order denying his motion to suppress as evidence the marijuana seized on his person.

Conner attracted the attention of the arresting officer while walking one morning, apparently aimlessly, through an alley of a commercial area. His manner aroused the officer’s suspicion. Then the officer observed him “lift his hat and take something out of it and bend down and put it in his shoe and then walk off.” The officer testified that “the only thing I could think of he’d be putting down there was a weapon” and said “I don’t really know that it was a knife or gun or ax or what.” The officer approached, commanded Conner to remove his shoe, and arrested him for possession of the marijuana that was revealed.

The record is barren of evidence that there was probable cause to believe Conner was “armed with a dangerous weapon which offers a threat to the safety of the officer or any other person . . . *Baker v. State,*316 So.2d 657, 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); *Perry v. State,*296 So.2d 505 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). There was no probable cause to believe Conner was about to commit a crime. Even giving full credit to the genuineness of the officer’s suspicion, suspicion is an insufficient predicate for the search. *Terry v. Ohio,*392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

The sentence is VACATED and Conner is DISCHARGED.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 17, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 17, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0105. JOHN T. SMITH v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF GEORGIA

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2015RCCV00312
May 8, 2001



TNP Enterprises, Inc.
Texas-New Mexico Power Company
4100 International Plaza
Forth Worth, Texas 76109

Dear Sirs:

At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, of the facts relating to your adoption of the expense as incurred method of
accounting for major maintenance costs.  We believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and other information furnished to us by appropriate officials of TNP Enterprises, Inc. and Texas-New Mexico Power Company (the "Companies"), that the
accounting change described in your Form 10-Q is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of the Companies and their consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2000.  Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do not express, an opinion on
the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q, on the related information furnished to us by officials of the Companies, or on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Companies and their consolidated subsidiaries as of
any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2000.

Yours truly,



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, TX
Jim Raba

06/29/2006 07:43 AM

To: Brenda Edwards-Jones/EE/DOE@DOE

cc:

Subject: Federal Register Notice of Public Meeting : Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines

0 Federal Record 0 Not a Federal Record

User Filed as : Not Categorized in ERMS

FYI.

-- Forwarded by Jim Raba/EE/DOE on 06/29/2006 07:43 AM -----

Jim Raba

06/28/2006 07:52 AM

To: Aabbott@navigantconsulting.com, bbach@duke-energy.com, Bryan Berringer/EE/DOE@DOE,

jblees@energy.state.ca.us, dick.bline@amsvendors.com, john@simplicool.com,

dmbrunda@southernco.com, bbyron@energy.state.ca.us, bec@nyserta.org,

hcarter@energy.commerce.state.nc.us, PChavan@Copeland-Corp.com,

mchristopher@navigantconsulting.com, dcohan@nwalliance.org, sconstantine@ase.org,

Thomas. coughlin@us.ngrid.com, Thomas.Depriest@hq.doe.gov, Adelaskil@aol.com,

douglassj@energy.wsa.ed, rduff@icfconsulting.com, teckman@nwcouncil.org, Brenda

Edwards-Jones/EE/DOE@DOE, PLE2@pge.com, leils@vending.org, rnelliott@aceee.org,

ielnecave@neep.org, rertinge@twcny.rr.com, Mark.Friedrichs@hq.doe.gov,

JAGephart@Copeland-Corp.com, wgoetzler@navigantconsulting.com, dgoldstein@nrdc.org,

mhoffman@ceel.org, jholland@energy.state.ca.us, fhh@dwgp.com, sjones@ceel.org, tjones@ceel.org,

timothy.kraus@manitowoc.com, bkelly@nrac.com, kkennedy@nrdc.org, akhan@ceel.org,

laurencel@multi-max.com, Qonnie Laughlin/EE/DOE@DOE, elevy@navigantconsulting.com, Ronald

Lewis/EE/DOE@DOE, jlinn@neep.org, bing.liu@pnl.gov, cmacminn@navigantconsulting.com,

amarantan@navigantconsulting.com, mmartin@energy.state.ca.us, imason@ceel.org, Michael

McCabe/EE/DOE@DOE, mccadden@royalvendors.com, pmiller@nrdc.org, hmisuriello@ase.org,

jmorris@nrac.com, snadel@aceee.org, cneme@veic.org, graham.parker@pnl.gov, Regina

Washington/EE/DOE@DOE, Charles Llenza/EE/DOE@DOE

cc:

Subject: Federal Register Notice of Public Meeting : Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines

0 Federal Record 40 Not a Federal Record

User Filed as : Not Categorized in ERMS

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Today, the Federal Register published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document for energy conservation

standards for refrigerated bottled or canned beverage vending machines . The Department of Energy will hold the public meeting on July 11,

2006 in Washington , DC. Please see the attached document for details.

Beverage Vending Machines 71 tR 36715 June 28 2006.pdf

Additional information, including the Framework Document for Refrigerated Beverage Vending MMines, will be available later today on the

Department of Energy website at http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/app]iance-Standards/

If you have any questions, you may contact Jim Raba or Charles LLenza at 202-586-8654 or 202-586-2192, respectively.

Jim Raba

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 04
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30214]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Termination of Environmental Impact Statement; Palm Beach 
International Airport, West Palm Beach, FL

agency: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

action: Notice of termination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is issuing this 
notice to advertise to the public that the environmental impact 
statement for the proposed extension of Runway 9L-27R to 10,000 feet at 
Palm Beach International Airport has been terminated. The FAA will 
continue the environmental process for the proposed extension of Runway 
9L-27R to 10,000 feet as an environmental assessment (EA). This is 
consistent with the previous Notice of Intent which was published in 
the Federal Register on March 12, 1996, as well as within the 
information presented during scoping.

for further information contact: Mr. Bart Vernace, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine 
National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, Florida 32822, (407) 812-6331, 
extension 27.

supplementary information: This notice announces that the FAA will 
terminate the Environmental Impact Statement and continue the 
environmental process as an Environmental Assessment for a proposed 
project to lengthen Runway 9L-27R at the Palm Beach International 
Airport (PBI) to 10,000 feet for air carrier aircraft use. The decision 
to terminate the EIS and continue the environmental process as an EA 
was based on the preliminary environmental analysis which depicted no 
significant impact in any environmental impact category. The Palm Beach 
County Department of Airports will prepare the draft EA document, make 
the draft EA document available to the public and governmental agencies 
for comment, offer the opportunity for a public hearing and submit the 
EA document to the FAA for the appropriate environmental decision.
    Questions may be directed to the individual named above under the 
heading, for further information contact.

    Issued in Orlando, Florida, November 7, 1997.
W. Dean Stringer,
Acting Manager, Orlando Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 97-30214 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial
  Commercial Corp. (the "Company") for the three months and six months ended
  June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the
  Company, certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to
  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



  By: /S/ JAMES W. STEWART
  ------------------------
  Name:  JAMES W. STEWART
  Chief Financial Officer



  August      , 2004


<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martin A. Roenigk, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CompuDyne
    Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present
    in all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
    the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I, are responsible
    for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
    procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
    15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

    (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
         such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
         our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
         to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
         is made known to us by others within those entities,
         particularly during the period in which this report is being
         prepared;

    (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our
         conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
         controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
         covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred
         during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
         has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
         materially affect, the registrant's internal control
         over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
    based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
    financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
    committee of registrant's board of directors;

    (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal controls over financial
         reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
         the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
         and report financial information; and

    (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
         or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.


Date: August 13, 2003             /s/ Martin Roenigk
                                  ---------------------
                                      Martin Roenigk
                                      Chief Executive Officer
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0414 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LANCE GARLAND LOVELESS ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including June 2 4 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2020

05/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0414
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2
                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, Cletus C. Glasener,  Vice  President-Finance  and Chief Financial  Officer of
Collins Industries,  Inc., certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the  quarterly  period
ended July 31, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 14, 2005

                                 By    /s/ Cletus C. Glasener
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Cletus C. Glasener, Vice President of
                                       Finance and Chief Financial Officer
```
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[4910-13-Pj

ONCI)""f."US

lII'''(;S'·'''>o:Jt.

Federal Aviation Administration

14CFR Part 39

(Docket No. FAA-2008-1 080; Directorate Identifier 2008-l\TJ\!1-118-AD)

RJN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mo

EMB-135BJ Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of comm

period.

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier NPRM for the products listed above. This aeti

revises the earlier NPRM by expanding the scope. This proposed AD results from

mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAT) originated by an aviation

authority of another country 10 identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

product. The earlier MeAl, Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2007-08-01, effective

September 27,2007, describes the unsafe condition as:

Fuel system reassessment, performed according lo REHA-E88/SF AR-88

(Reglliamento Brasileiro de Homologacao Aeronalltica 88/Special Federal

Aviation Regulation No. 88), requires the inclusion of new maintenance

tasks in the Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL)

and in the Fuel System Limitations (FSL), necessary to preclude ignition

sources in the fuel system. * * *

lIIP-T T.

"mAL':''''

(' . C<..v......- n

7(H/I.

<HINCSY"""'.

- /1'(

OUTIN(;''''''''''.

unNGSYlI I..
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 26, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00491

- CV

AKOE, LLC, Appellant

v.

RJ Machine Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES T RIAN A AND SMITH AFFIR MED IN PART, REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART, REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from district court ’ s partial denial of appellant ’ s motion to dismiss under the

Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) signed by th e tr i a l court on July 26, 2019 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties ’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the court’s order

. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court ’ s order denying AKOE ’ s mo tion

to d ismiss as to RJ Machine ’ s cla ims seeking declaration s that (1) the Purchase Agreement “ is

valid and en forceable ” and (2) “ R J Machine is under no ob ligation ” to repair “ or cover the cost

of any mainten ance ” of the Lear because the TCPA does not apply to these claims. T h e Court

reverse s the district court ’ s order as it relates t o RJ Machine ’ s claims for breach of contract and

its claim seeking a de c laration th at “ RJ Machine owes no obl i gations to [ AKOE ] b ased on

[ AKOE ’ s] demands regarding ” the Lear

, and t he Court render s j udgment dismissing thosecla i ms

. T h e Court remand s the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with thi s

opinion

. A ppell ee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in th is Court and in the court

below.
#### MATERIALS OF MIAMI, INC. v. MATTHEWS.

No. 39218.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 524.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7110

EDDIE L. BARKSDALE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MS. BASSET, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1401-1) Submitted: December 10, 2004 Decided: December 23, 2004 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie L. Barksdale, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Eddie Louis Barksdale seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Commonwealth’s motion to dismiss Barksdale’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and denying his claims as procedurally defaulted. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barksdale has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Barksdale’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED