alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.3
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 14, 2007
    By:
    /s/Jeffry E. SterbaJeffry E. SterbaChairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Public Service Company of New Mexico
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1951 

To increase the Federal share provided under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

Relief and Emergency Assistance Act for a certain time frame during 

fiscal year 2020. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BERA, Mr. 

CARBAJAL, Mr. COSTA, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. GARAMENDI, 

Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. LAMALFA, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. 

LOFGREN, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, and Ms. SPEIER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To increase the Federal share provided under the Robert 

T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act for a certain time frame during fiscal year 2020. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increase Federal Dis5 aster Cost Share Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1951 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF FEDERAL SHARE. 

2 Notwithstanding sections 403(b), 403(c)(4), 404(a), 

3 406(b), 408(d), 408(g)(2), 428(e)(2)(B), and 503(a) of 

4 the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency As5 sistance Act 10 (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), for any emer6 gency or major disaster declared by the President under 

7 such Act during the period beginning on January 1, 2020, 

8 and ending on December 31, 2020, the Federal share of 

9 assistance provided under such sections shall be not less 

10 than 90 percent of the eligible cost of such assistance. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 9798.

#### Coale v. *E*atwell.

(Decided January 8, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Trumbull County.

*Mr. Washington Hyde*and *Messrs. Gillmer & Gilhner,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr.-T. H. Gillmer,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew and Spear, JJ.,-concur.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Betty MILLS, Appellee.

No. 72-131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 29, 1972.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

C. J. Abernathy, St. Petersburg, for ap-pellee.

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A., we have dispensed with the necessity for oral argument and will consider the matter on the briefs submitted by the respective parties.

Appellee was charged with a violation of the narcotics law upon a seizure made under a search warrant issued by the Justice of the Peace. She filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized and the trial judge entered its order granting defendant’s motion to suppress. The State takes this appeal.

We have examined the affidavit for the search warrant together with the search warrant and find only one defect, but that defect brings us to an affirmance of the trial judge’s order granting the motion to suppress. The trial judge said in his order:

> “The Court further finds that the Affidavit and Warrant fail to show any facts or circumstances sufficient to show *when*the alleged informant learned of the alleged illegal activities at the premises . so that from the Affidavit and Warrant the Court is wholly unable to determine when said alleged illegal activities were observed at the premises.” (Emphasis added.)

The affidavit and warrant should have contained specific time or times when the informant allegedly obtained narcotics from appellee’s premises.

For the foregoing reasons we affirm.

HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.3**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/Jeffry                E. Sterba     |
|----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Jeffry                E. Sterba        |
|                             |   | Chairman,                President and |
|                             |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
#### Juan Antonio ALFONSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-261.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 22, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         259,919
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,273,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 25,375,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,618,060
<PP&E>                                      35,001,797
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,070,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,455,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,390,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       738,341
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,566,527
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 48,455,540
<SALES>                                     76,692,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,692,736
<CGS>                                       64,615,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               72,101,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (169,432)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             912,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,848,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                   800,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,048,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,048,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1740

___________ Steven M. Jacob; Dan Meis, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Robert Houston, in his individual and * official capacity as Director of the * [UNPUBLISHED] Nebraska Department of Correctional * Services; Nebraska Department of * Correctional Services, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: July 5, 2007 Filed: July 10, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Steven Jacob and Daniel Meis are se rving sentences of life imprisonment in Nebraska for first-degree murder. They filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, claiming that denying them eligibility for parole violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Eighth Ame ndment’s prohibition against cruel and1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chie f Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. -2- unusual punishment, and the Ex Post Facto Clause. The district court 1 found plaintiffs had stated no federal claim, dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and later denied plaintiffs’ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Upon de novo review of the dismissal, see Federer v. Gephardt , 363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2004) (s tandard of review), we agree with the district court that plaintiffs failed to state any federal claim, seeWhisman v. Rinehart , 119 F.3d 1303, 1312 (8th Cir. 1997) (alle ged violation of state law does not by itself state claim under § 1983). The court also properly refused to enter a default judgment, seeFed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A); did not err in substituting Robert Houston for Harold Clarke; and did not abuse its discretion in denying the Rule 59(e) motion, see Flannery v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. , 160 F.3d 425, 427-28 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion to supplement.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Change in Status of an Extended Benefit (EB) Period for 
the State of Puerto Rico

    This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under 
the EB Program for the State of Puerto Rico.

Summary

    The following changes have occurred since the publication of the 
last notice regarding States' EB status:

<bullet> August 24, 1997--Puerto Rico's 13-week insured unemployment 
rate for the week ending August 9, 1997 exceeded 6.0 percent, causing 
the State to trigger ``on'' EB effective August 24, 1997.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms 
and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, 
regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Labor, and the 
operating instructions issued to the States by the U.S. Department of 
Labor. In the case of a State beginning an EB period, the State 
employment security agency will furnish a written notice of potential 
entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular 
benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)).
    Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB, or who wish to 
inquire about their rights under the program, should contact the 
nearest State employment service office or unemployment compensation 
claims office in their locality.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., on November 13, 1997.
Raymond J. Uhalde,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment and Training.
[FR Doc. 97-30682 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7161

RONALD WALLACE HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. IBARRA, Physician; P. A. TERRANGI, Warden; INDIAN CREEK CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-507-AM) Submitted: December 14, 1999 Decided: December 30, 1999 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Wallace Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Ibarra , No. CA99-507-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Respect Your Universe, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Aaron M. Loreth, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: April 30, 2013
/s/ Aaron M. LorethAaron M. Loreth,

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                 |
|---------------------------------|
|                                 |  |
| Date:    November 25, 2019 | /s/ David B. Golub                      |
|                            | David B. GolubChief Executive Officer |
|                            |   |
|                            | /s/ Ross A. Teune                     |
|                            | Ross A. TeuneChief Financial Officer |
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Ronaldo Reyes       | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 1761 East St. Andrew Place           | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Santa Ana, CA  92705                 | Wilmington, DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Darnella Tinnel-Crawford       | Ally Bank |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700               | Attn:  Martha Tate |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 200 West Civic Center Drive |
|                                            | Sandy, UT 84070 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
#### ENGKVIST v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY.

No. 39041.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Larry W. Sayre, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Collins Industries, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Dated: | September 7, 2004 | /s/ Larry W. Sayre                 
|------ | ----------------- | -----------------------------------
|       |                   | Larry W. Sayre , Vice President of 
|       |                   | Finance and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Prior year data wa restated to reflect pooling of interests merger effective
December 29, 1997. Also, Primary EPS represents Basic EPS under new SFAS 128.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999             JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1998             OCT-03-1997
<CASH>                                          40,675                  41,412
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,662                  90,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,785                   1,845
<INVENTORY>                                     68,627                  64,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,488                 202,904
<PP&E>                                         138,455                 105,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,729                  45,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,125                 313,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,490                  90,606
<BONDS>                                         46,281                  56,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        83,169                  66,425
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,917                  80,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,125                 313,298
<SALES>                                        393,584                 379,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               393,584                 379,085
<CGS>                                          288,908                 277,439
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  288,908                 277,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                77,393                  58,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,069                   3,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,208                  40,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,797                  12,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,411                  27,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                 (2,062)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,411                  25,834
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45                    0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42                    0.64
        


</TABLE>
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

| By:   | /s/ Graham Neil                                                                                              |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |  Graham Neil                                                                                       |
|            |  Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial  Officer) |

| Date: May 31, 2010  |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
|                          |