alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3851 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 361
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3851

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 90 McCamly Street South in Battle Creek, Michigan, as the 
                    ``Sojourner Truth Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2024

  Mr. Peters (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

               April 11 (legislative day, April 10), 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 90 McCamly Street South in Battle Creek, Michigan, as the 
                    ``Sojourner Truth Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOJOURNER TRUTH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 90 McCamly Street South in Battle Creek, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sojourner Truth Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sojourner 
Truth Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 361

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3851

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 90 McCamly Street South in Battle Creek, Michigan, as the 
                    ``Sojourner Truth Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

               April 11 (legislative day, April 10), 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Dennis L. HARDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-609.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 12, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2015

a0831 

# Order

Clerk September 9, 2015

150140(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150140

COA: 322500

Wayne CC: 03

- 007705

- FC

ROBERT JARMEL ANDERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 28, 2015

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### Kenneth E. PADGETT and Sarah Padgett, Appellants, v. GULFSTREAM AIR CONDITIONING CO., INC., and Climate Master Products, Inc., etc., Appellees.

No. 73-185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Richard Eugene WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 39181.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 253.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7535

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LONNELL DEANGELO MCRAE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. ( 5:13

- cr - 00099

- BO

- 1 ; 5:16

- cv - 00328

- BO )

Submitted : January 21, 20 20 Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON , KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Lonnell Deangelo McRae, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lonnell Deangelo Mc R ae seeks to appeal the district court’s order denyin g relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (201 8 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (201 8 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial sh owing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessmen t of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both tha t the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mc R ae has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid t he decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### Mrs. Barbara Ashley TAYLOR, Appellant, v. MALCO THEATRES, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 46201.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 29, 1971.

Johnny N. Tackett, Aberdeen, for appellant.

Mitchell, McNutt & Bush, F. M. Bush, III, Tupelo, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Richard GROS v. Kenneth D. COMEAUX et al.

No. 5966.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1974.

Gordon Hackman, Boutte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Robert Payton, Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before REDMANN and STOULIG JJ., and FLEMING, J. Pro Tem.

REDMANN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing the alleged insurer of the other automobile involved in a Louisiana collision-in which plaintiff was injured.

The petition alleged the insurer, through a Texas agent, insured an automobile bearing Texas license plates and owned by two persons, one domiciled in Texas and one in Louisiana.

The insurer moved and obtained summary judgment on a factually undisputed showing that, although it had issued a 30-day binder to the *Texas*resident and several extensions, the last ten-day extension expired two days before the accident.

Plaintiff argued (in the form of a counter-affidavit which does not show plaintiff’s competency to execute it, as required by C.C.P. art. 967) that the insurer was aware the car was being used in Louisiana yet “did not give the notices required by Louisiana law for termination of poli*99cies and no notice of cancellation was ever delivered” to the insured.

The binder was not cancelled but expired. Thus Louisiana’s law requiring notice of *cancellation*is not applicable.

Conceivably a binder (if a “policy”) might be subject to *non-renewal*notice requirements of La.R.S. 22:636.1, and like the policy in Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Freret, La.App.1973, 280 So.2d 638, remain in force in the absence of the required notice. But that statute is only applicable to policies “delivered or issued for delivery in this state, insuring a single individual or husband and wife resident of the same household * *

From the pleadings and affidavit it is undisputed that this insurance was issued in Texas to insure a Texas resident. Use of the car in Louisiana is not the test of La.R.S. 22:636.1. That statute’s requirement of notice of non-renewal is by its terms not applicable.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Kenneth R. RIDDLE et al. v. Robert MENARD et al.

No. 62347.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Kenneth R. Riddle and Anna Soi-leau Riddle applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Landry. 355 So.2d 1350.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
IW17PF_437
IW17PF_438
IW17PF_439
IW17PF_440
IW17PF_441
IW17PF_442
IW17PF_443
IW17PF_444
IW17PF_445
IW17PF_446
IW17PF_447
IW17PF_448
IW17PF_449
IW17PF_450
IW17PF_451
IW17PF_452
IW17PF_453
IW17PF_454
IW17PF_455
IW17PF_456
#### PITTMAN v. FLORIDA CARTAGE CO. et al.

No. 39216.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1
                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I,  Donald  Lynn  Collins,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Collins
Industries,  Inc.,  certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the  quarterly  period
ended April 30, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 29, 2005

                                       By:  /s/ Donald Lynn Collins
                                          --------------------------------------
                                            Donald Lynn Collins, President
                                            and Chief Executive Officer
```
Exhibit 99.6

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEER**

 

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating (i) a portion of Cenovus Energy Inc. oil and gas reserves data, including estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2010, estimated using forecast prices and costs, and (ii) the contingent resources and economic resources of Cenovus Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2010, estimated using forecast prices and costs, and the information derived from our reports,  as described or incorporated by reference in Cenovus Energy Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Cenovus Energy Inc.’s registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-163397), Form F-3 (File No. 333-166419), and Form F-9 (File No. 333-167876) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.

 

 

 

MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.

 

 
| /s/   P. A. Welch                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| P.   A. Welch, P. Eng.                       |   |
| President   & Managing Director          |   |
|                                         |
|                                         |
| Calgary,   Alberta

February 25,   2011 |

 

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Audience Productions, Inc. a Washington corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), George Brumder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Audience Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Audience Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|       |  |                         |  |  |  |  |  | 
|------ |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | 
|       |  |                         |  | 
|By:    |  | /s/ GEORGE R. BRUMDER  
|Name:  |  | George R. Brumder      
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  |  | December 28, 2010
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 20-0341

Filed December 16, 2020

JOHN H. WHITE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CITY OF DUBUQUE BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Monica Zrinyi 

Wittig, Judge.

Property owner appeals a remand order issued in response to his petition 

for writ of certiorari. AFFIRMED.

Stuart G. Hoover, East Dubuque, Illinois, for appellant.

Maureen Quann, Assistant City Attorney, Dubuque, for appellee.

Considered by Doyle, P.J., and Mullins and Greer, JJ.
2

MULLINS, Judge.

John White appeals the remand of the certiorari proceeding he initiated 

against the City of Dubuque Building Code Board of Appeals (Board) on the basis 

that the Board failed to follow its own rules and procedures and violated White’s 

due process rights. The remand was for the purpose of the Board proceeding in 

compliance with the city code. We affirm for the reasons stated in our 

contemporaneously filed decision in Kopzyck v. City of Dubuque Building Code 

Board of Appeals, No. 20-0340, 2020 WL _______, at *__ (Iowa Ct. App. Dec. 16, 

2020) (“It is the rule that certiorari proceedings may be remanded where the inferior 

tribunal has not proceeded according to law and the mistake may be corrected 

upon a further hearing.” (quoting Watson v. Charlton, 50 N.W.2d 605, 611 (Iowa 

1951))).

AFFIRMED.
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #26 - 6.03 Ten-year Experience for Certain Critical Assumptions 

Does the application describe the plan's experience for certain critical assumptions. including a 

disclosure for each of the ten (10) plan years immediately preceding the application that 

separately identifies: 

• total contributions; 

• total contribution base units; 

• average contribution rates; 

• withdrawal liability payments; and 

• the rate of return on plan assets? 

See section 6.03. 

Document 26.1 describes the Pension Plan's experience for certain critical assumptions with 

respect to the above-listed factors. 
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #26 - 6.03 Ten-year Experience for Certain Critical Assumptions 

26.1 

Document 26.1 

Pension Plan's Ten-Year Experience for Certain Critical Assumptions 

Year

Ending

6/30

Base

Units

(Weeks)

Average 

Weekly

Rate

Contributions 

Excluding 

Withdrawal Liability 

Payments

Withdrawal 

Liability 

Payments

Return on 

Assets

(Market Basis)

2006 19,363 $114.77 $2,222,212 - 5.36%

2007 18,220 $124.94 $2,276,363 - 15.40%

2008 16,680 $131.97 $2,201,243 - -4.93%

2009 13,638 $137.28 $1,872,199 $32,706 -20.15%

2010 12,822 $144.81 $1,856,770 $35,322 13.86%

2011 10,693 $164.21 $1,755,910 $166,184 24.38%

2012 9,370 $180.53 $1,691,556 $390,809 -0.14%

2013 9,220 $201.24 $1,855,407 $390,808 13.49%

2014 10,035 $209.15 $2,098,772 $799,205 17.39%

2015 8,106 $232.88 $1,887,739 $1,084,126 -0.39%

2016 5,993 $272.84 $1,635,146 $8,160,599 -1.33%
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 127 (Friday, July 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 38589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16211]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7072]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Venice: Canaletto and His Rivals''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Venice: Canaletto and His Rivals,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about February 20, 2011, 
until on or about May 30, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 25, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-16211 Filed 7-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph M. ODonnell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph M. ODonnell             
|Joseph M. ODonnell                 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|August 5, 2005                      



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS Floating Rate Plus Fund and DWS Core Plus Income Fund**

**Each a Series of DWS Portfolio Trust**

Investment Company Act file number  811-42

DWS Portfolio Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  01/31

DWS Core Plus Income Fund

Date of fiscal year end:  05/31

DWS Floating Rate Plus Fund

Date of reporting period:  7/1/08-6/30/09

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 

----