alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8.1

CHINA HYDROELECTRIC CORPORATION(incorporated in the Cayman Islands)

|                                                                         |  |           |  |             
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------- |  | ------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                       |  | OWNERSHIP |  | JURISDICTION
|Beijing A.B.C. Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.                           |  |           |  | 100         
|Yunnan Huabang Electric Power Development Co., Ltd.                      |  |           |  | 100         
|Sichuan Huabang Hydroelectric Development Co., Ltd.                      |  |           |  | 100         
|Yunhe County Shapulong Hydropower Generation Co., Ltd.                   |  |           |  | 100         
|Zhejiang Province Jingning Yingchuan Hydroelectric Development Co., Ltd. |  |           |  | 100         
|Qingtian Wuliting Hydroelectric Development Co., Ltd.                    |  |           |  | 100         
|Suichang County Jiulongshan Hydroelectric Development Co., Ltd.          |  |           |  | 100         
|Suichang County Zhougongyuan Hydroelectric Development Co., Ltd.         |  |           |  | 100         
|Sanming Zhongyin Banzhu Hydroelectric Co., Ltd.                          |  |           |  | 100         
|Pingnan County Wangkeng Hydroelectric Co., Ltd.                          |  |           |  | 100         
|Pingnan County Yuanping Hydroelectric Co., Ltd.                          |  |           |  | 100         
|Pingnan County Yuheng Hydropower Co., Ltd.                               |  |           |  | 100         
|Sunpower Asia Limited                                                    |  |           |  | 100         
|China Hydroelectric Corporation (Hong Kong) Limited                      |  |           |  | 100         
|Longquan Ruiyang Cascade II Hydroelectric Co., Ltd.                      |  |           |  | 100         
|Fujian Huabang Hydroelectric Investment Co., Ltd.                        |  |           |  | 100         
|Henan Wuyue Storage Power Generating Co., Ltd.                           |  |           |  | 79          
|Yingjiang County Qinrui Husahe Hydropower Co., Ltd.                      |  |           |  | 100         
|Luquan Xiaopengzu Power Generation Co., Ltd.                             |  |           |  | 100         
|Fugong County Hengda Hydroelectric Development Co., Ltd.                 |  |           |  | 100         
|Fugong Xineng Power Development Co., Ltd.                                |  |           |  | 100         
|Shaowu City Jinlong Hydroelectric Co., Ltd.                              |  |           |  | 55          
|Shaowu City Jintang Hydroelectric Co., Ltd.                              |  |           |  | 74          
|Shaowu City Jinwei Hydroelectric Co., Ltd.                               |  |           |  | 74          
|Shaowu City Jinling Power Generation Co., Ltd.                           |  |           |  | 100         



---
#### FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Appellant, v. O’Neal Henry JOHNS, Appellee.

No. O-368.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 9, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 8, 1972.

*55Alfred A. Green, Jr., of Green & Stras-ser, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

R. K. Roberson, DeLand, for appellee.

SPECTOR, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment founded upon jury verdicts in favor of ap-pellee in the amount of $25,000 compensatory damages and $30,000 punitive damages in an action arising out of an assault perpetrated by an agent of appellant upon the appellee. For a full detail of the facts, see this Court’s earlier opinion in Johns v. Ford Motor Credit Company, Fla.App., 226 So.2d 403.

Appellant contends that the judgment for compensatory damages should be reversed on authority of Hutchins v. City of Hialeah, 196 So.2d 741 (Fla.1967), for the reason that following our decision in Johns v. Ford, supra, Johns had prosecuted a separate action against appellant’s agent, Mowry, which resulted in a jury verdict of $1,850 compensatory damages and no punitive damages. However, appellee contends that this issue is controlled by our decision in Gerardi v. Carlisle, Fla.App., 232 So.2d 36, wherein we held:

> “It seems clear to us that the doctrines of res judicata and estoppel by judgment do not operate to bar a plaintiff who has recovered a judgment against one tort-feasor from relitigating all issues in a subsequent suit against a joint tort-fea-sor. ...”

Appellee’s contention that the instant case is governed by the above principle elaborated by us in Gerardi is correct. Our examination of the Hutchins case relied on by appellant convinces us that it is inapplicable here because Hutchins was postured differently than the case at hand. Therefore, it is not dispositive of the res judicata and estoppel issue raised by appellant.

By its remaining issue, appellant contends that the jury’s refusal to render a verdict for punitive damages against its agent Mowry in the separate action against him serves as a bar to a punitive damage verdict against it. This contention was rejected by the court in Joab, Inc. v. Thrall, 245 So.2d 291 (Fla.App.1971). In Joab, as in the case at bar, there was involved an assault and battery committed without legal justification. The court held that the plaintiff could properly be awarded punitive damages from an employer even though the employee who committed the assault and battery was assessed only for compensatory damages. In so holding, the court stated:

> “In awarding punitive damages the jury may properly punish each wrongdoer by exacting from his pocketbook a sum of money which, according to his financial ability, will hurt, but not bankrupt; and the verdict shall state separately the amount of punitive damages. Lehman v. Spencer Ladd’s, Inc., Fla.1966, 182 So.2d 402; and Rule 1.481 R.C.P., 30 F.S.A.”

Accordingly, the judgment reviewed herein is affirmed in all respects.

WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1960 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1960

 To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 
 clinic, located at 400 College Drive, Middleburg, Florida, the ``A.K. 
                           Baker VA Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2021

   Mrs. Cammack (for herself, Mr. C. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mrs. 
   Demings, Mr. Gaetz, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, Ms. Salazar, Mr. Diaz-
   Balart, Mr. Lawson of Florida, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. 
  Donalds, Mr. Mast, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Posey, Mr. 
     Steube, Mr. Waltz, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Crist, and Mr. Gimenez) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 
 clinic, located at 400 College Drive, Middleburg, Florida, the ``A.K. 
                           Baker VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMUNITY-BASED 
              OUTPATIENT CLINIC LOCATED AT 400 COLLEGE DRIVE, 
              MIDDLEBURG, FLORIDA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 
clinic, located at 400 College Drive, Middleburg, Florida, shall after 
the date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``A.K. Baker VA Clinic''. Any reference to such community-based 
outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or 
other paper of the United States shall be considered to be a reference 
to the A.K. Baker VA Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
#### Helen HOPWOOD, Appellant, v. John R. HOPWOOD, Appellee.

No. 70-579.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PUBLIC MEETING ON TEST PROCEDURES FOR

DISTRIBUTION TRANSFO RMERS

U.S. Department of Energy Room 1E-245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 September 27, 2004

Purpose Interested persons will have an opportunity to provide comments to the Department on its Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNOPR) on test procedures for distribution transformers. 

### Agenda

9:00-9:05 am Welcome 9:05-9:15 am Introduction and Agenda Review

Doug Brookman 9:15-9:30 am Overview of the Proposed Rule

Cyrus Nasseri This presentation sets the context, and provides a review of the process to date and an overview of the five areas that will be discussed during today's public meeting.
9:30-10: 15 am Comments and Issues from Participants

This is an open forum for participants to make a brief summary statement and/or identify their key issues regarding the SNOPR proposal. For each of the topics that follows, DOE will make a brief introduction followed by comments-from participants.
10:15-10:30 am Break
10:30-11:30 am Definition of a Distribution Transformer

Mike Scholand This topic concerns the Department's proposed definition of Distribution Transformer.11:30

- 12:15 pm Definition of Basic Model Mike Scholand This topic concerns the Department's proposed definition of "Basic Model," the finest level of disaggregation at which manufacturers would rate the energy efficiency of Distribution Transformers.
12:15-1:15 pm Lunch 1:15-2:00 pm Uniform Test Method for Measuring Energy Consumption

Oskars Petersons This topic concerns the proposed test method by which manufacturers and the Department would test Distribution Transformers to determine their efficiency rating. 2:00-3:00 pm Sampling Plans for Compliance and Enforcement Testing

Oskars Petersons and Ken Stricklett This topic concerns the Department's proposed sampling plan by which manufacturers may rate their products and demonstrate compliance with a minimum efficiency performance standard. 

### 3:00-3:15 pm Break 3:15-4:15 pm Alternative Efficiency Determination Method (AEDM)

Ken Stricklett This topic introduces and describes the AEDM, and discusses how a manufacturer may choose to substantiate and then use the AEDM to reduce testing burden. 

### 4:15- 5: 00 pm Other Issues

This is an opportunity to discuss any remaining issues identified earlier in the Comments and Issues segment of the agenda. 

### 5:00 pm Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29145]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Public Hearing on Trans World Airlines (TWA) Flight 800 Accident

    In connection with its investigation of the accident involving 
Trans World Airlines (TWA) flight 800, a Boeing 747-100, N93119, in the 
Atlantic Ocean near East Moriches, NY, July 17, 1996, the National 
Transportation Safety Board will convene a public hearing beginning at 
9:00 a.m., on Monday, December 8, 1997, at the Baltimore Convention 
Center, Halls A and B, One West Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD. For more 
information, contact Shelly Hazle, Office of Public Affairs, 
Washington, D.C. 20594, telephone (202) 314-6100.

    Dated: October 30, 1997.
Ray Smith,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-29145 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
### The HONORAB LE PATRICK A. CONMY, United States District Judge 1 

### for the District of North Dakota. ___________ No. 95-4066

___________ Brian D. Gale, DM, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Podiatry Insurance Company * [UNPUBLISHED] of America, a foreign mutual, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 24, 1996 Filed: October 2, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dr. Brian D. Gale appeals from the district court's grant of summary 1 judgment in favor of Podiatry Insurance Company of America (PICA). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that th e judgment of the distr ict court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Frank Hungerford SANTMEYER, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50280.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 24, 1977.

Rex K. Jones, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Catherine W. Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lamar County; R. I. Prichard, III, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Page 37.1.881

ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC 

Page 37.1.883
Page 37.1.884
Page 37.1.885
 

Page 37.1.886

 

STEVENS CREEK BMW 

Page 37.1.888
 

Page 37.1.889
Page 37.1.890
Page 37.1.891

 

STEVENS CREEK TOYOTA 

Page 37.1.893
Page 37.1.894
Page 37.1.895
Page 37.1.896
 

Page 37.1.897

STEWART’S BODY SHOP 

Page 37.1.899
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1704 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1704

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and extend the 
 deduction for charitable contributions for individuals not itemizing 
                              deductions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2021

  Mr. Pappas (for himself and Mrs. Walorski) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and extend the 
 deduction for charitable contributions for individuals not itemizing 
                              deductions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Universal Giving Pandemic Response 
and Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE 
              CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS NOT ITEMIZING DEDUCTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (p) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(p) Special Rule for Taxpayers Who Do Not Elect To Itemize 
Deductions.--In the case of a taxable year beginning in 2021 or 2022, 
the deduction under this subsection for the taxable year shall be equal 
to so much of the deduction determined under this section (without 
regard to this subsection) for such taxable year as does not exceed an 
amount equal to \1/3\ of the amount of the standard deduction with 
respect to such individual for such taxable year. This subsection shall 
apply only in the case of an individual who does not elect to itemize 
deductions for the taxable year.''.
    (b) Elimination of Penalty.--
            (1) In general.--Section 6662(b) of the Internal Revenue 
        Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (9).
            (2) Increased penalty.--Section 6662 of such Code is 
        amended by striking subsection (l).
            (3) Conforming amendment.--Section 6751(b)(2)(A) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``6655, or 6662 (but only with 
        respect to an addition to tax by reason of subsection (b)(9) 
        thereof)'' and inserting ``or 6655''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald Lynn Collins certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Collins Industries, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|Dated: | June 9, 2004 | /s/ Donald Lynn Collins       
|------ | ------------ | ------------------------------
|       |              | Donald Lynn Collins, President
|       |              | and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 30063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12723]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) published 
a document in the Federal Register on May 20, 2015, (80 FR 28988), 
concerning notice of a closed meeting where the Board Members will 
discuss issues dealing with potential Recommendations to the Secretary 
of Energy. That notice stated that the Board would convene the closed 
meeting at the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana 
Avenue NW., Room 352, Washington, DC 20004. The Board wishes to correct 
that notice to indicate that the closed meeting will be in Room 425.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Welch, General Manager, Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, 
Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of May 20, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-12391, on 
page 28988, under the ADDRESSES caption, first column, correct the 
statement to read:

    Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., 
Room 425, Washington, DC 20004.

    Date: May 20, 2015.
Jessie H. Roberson,
Vice Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2015-12723 Filed 5-21-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Outer Continental Shelf, Central Gulf of Mexico, Oil and Gas 
Lease Sale 169

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Availability of the proposed notice of sale.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS); notice of 
availability of the proposed notice of sale for proposed Oil and Gas 
Lease Sale 169 in the Central Gulf of Mexico. This notice of 
availability is published pursuant to 30 CFR 256.29(c), as a matter of 
information to the public.
    With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the 
Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, as amended, 
provides the affected States the opportunity to review the proposed 
Notice of Sale.
    The proposed notice of sale for proposed Sale 169 may be obtained 
by written request to the Public Information Unit, Gulf of Mexico 
Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New 
Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394, or by telephone at (504) 736-2519.
    The final notice of sale will be published in the Federal Register 
at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening is 
scheduled for March 1998.

    Dated: November 18, 1997.
Carolita U. Kallaur,
Acting Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. 97-30893 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
Bricklayers & Allied Cr·aftsmcn Local No.7 Pension Plan 

Checklist Item #03 

Does the application include a penalties-of-perjury statement signed by an authorized tmstec on 

behalf of the board oftmstccs? Sec section 2.03. 

Document 3.1 provides the penalties-of-pe1jury statement signed by an authori7.ed trustee on 

behalf of the l3oard of Trustees of the Pension Plan. 

3. 1 
2.03 Penalties of Perjury 

Document 3.1 

Penalties-of-Perjury Statement 

The fo llowing is a copy of th.: penalties-of~perjuty statement signed by an authorized 

trustee on behalf' of the Board of Trustees of the Pension Plan. 

For the penalties-of-perjury stutement, see the f\.1llowing page. 

3.2 
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Special Medical Advisory Group, Notice of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (Public Law 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.), that the Department of 
Veterans Affairs' Special Medical Advisory Group has been renewed for a 
2-year period beginning November 13, 1997, through November 13, 1999.

    Dated: November 17, 1997.

    By Direction of the Acting Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30875 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M