alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert HOUSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-707.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Robert Houston, pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*812PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.
#### Glenn Richard SHIPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2366.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 12, 1977.

James K. Kreeland, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty.- Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

We have reviewed the record and briefs in this case and we find the judgment and sentence appealed from must be reversed.

The search giving rise to the incriminating evidence upon which appellant was convicted was an unlawful search and thus the trial court should have granted appellant’s motion to suppress said evidence. We note in passing that we have recently affirmed a revocation of appellant’s probation based upon the very evidence we now hold must be suppressed. Lest we be charged with inconsistency, we point out that the tainted evidence is not subject to the rule of exclusion in probation revocation proceedings. Thus, that evidence could be considered by the trial judge in that administrative proceeding, but not in a criminal prosecution for the new offense. *Croteau v. State,*334 So.2d 577 (Fla.1976).

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to grant the appellant’s motion to suppress and for appropriate further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED, with directions.

MAGER and CROSS, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.02**






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial Corp.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
      Salek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
      18
      U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




By:
      /s/
      William Salek


Name:
      William Salek


Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:  November
      14, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas Miller, the chief financial officer of TeleNav, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By:

/S/    DOUGLAS
MILLERDouglas MillerChief Financial OfficerDate: September 9, 2011
Analytical Laboratories, Inc.

1804 N. 33rd Street

Boise, Idaho 83703 

Phone (208) 342-5515

Attn: Greg Bame Collected By:

NASi Submitted By: Greg Bame

421 Leader St

Marion OH 43302

Source of Sample:

Time of Collection: ALPINE ICE-MELT

Date of Collection:

Date Received: 8/7/2007

Report Date: 9/10/2007

PWS: PWS 

Laboratory Analysis Report

Sample Number: 0726632

Analysis Date 

Test Requested MCL Result Units MDL Method Completed Analyst

Ceriodaphnia dubia EPA 1002.0

Pimephales promela EPA 1000.0

Selenastrum EPA 1003.0

Metals Digestion * EPA 200.9-11 8/8/2007 JS

Copper, Cu <0.1 mg/L 0.1 EPA 200.7 8/16/2007 KC

Barium, Ba <0.5 mg/L 0.5 EPA 200.7 8/16/2007 KC

Zinc, Zn <0.1 mg/L 0.1 EPA 200.7 8/16/2007 KC

Cadmium, Cd <0.05 mg/L 0.05 EPA 200.7 8/16/2007 KC

Arsenic, As <1.0 mg/L 1.0 EPA 200.7 8/16/2007 KC

Selenium, Se <1.0 mg/L 1.0 EPA 200.7 8/16/2007 KC

Lead, Pb <0.5 mg/L 0.5 EPA 200.7 8/16/2007 KC

Mercury, Hg <0.02 mg/L 0.02 EPA 245.1 8/15/2007 KC

Freezer Settleable Solids <1.0 % 1.0 PNS 9/4/2007 JH

No ppt observed. No density felt at any level.

% Solid Passing #10 Sieve > 99.0 % PNS 9/4/2007 JH

100 percent passing both the #10 and #100 sieves. Freezer temperature at - 35 C.

MCL = Maximum Contamination Level 

MDL = Method/Minimum Detection Limit

 UR = Unregulated
Page 1 of 2 Date Report Printed: 9/10/2007 3:54:42 
Laboratory Analysis Report

Sample Number: 0726632

Analysis Date 

Test Requested MCL Result Units MDL Method Completed Analyst

Corrosion Rate, 3 Day, TSI Coupons - 4.8 % NACE PNS 8/13/2007 JH

Corrosion Rate Duplicate = - 4.8 %

Specific Gravity 1.277 wt/vol ASTM D 1429 8/20/2007 JS

Chromium, Cr <0.5 mg/L 0.5 EPA 200.7 8/16/2007 KC

Freezing Point Specific Gravity Chart ASTM

Total Phosphate (as P) 5 mg/L 5 EPA 365.4 8/10/2007 WW

Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl (TKN) 920 mg/L 100 EPA 351.2 8/23/2007 WW

Ammonia, Distilled (as N) 3 mg/L 1 EPA 350.2 8/16/2007 SS

 Nitrate (as N) <20 mg/L 20 EPA 300.0 8/17/2007 WW

Nitrite (as N) <2 mg/L 2 EPA 353.2 8/17/2007 SS

pH * S.U. EPA 150.1 8/20/2007 WW

Cyanide, Total <0.05 mg/L 0.05 EPA 335.4 8/14/2007 WW

pH, Deicer 1 + 4 9.0 S.U. ASTM D1293 8/14/2007 WW

Chemical Oxygen Demand 430,000 mg/L 4000 EPA 410.4 8/14/2007 SS

Biochemical Oxygen 182,000 mg/L EPA 405.1 8/22/2007 DLR

MCL = Maximum Contamination Level MDL = Method/Minimum Detection Limit UR = Unregulated
Thank you for choosing Analytical Laboratories for your testing needs.

If you have any questions concerning this report, 

 please contact: James Hibbs Page 2 of 2 Date Report Printed: 9/10/2007 3:54:42 

PM
SMW0046

SMW0047

SMW0048

SMW0049

SMW0050

SMW0051

SMW0052

SMW0053

SMW0054

SMW0055

SMW0056

SMW0057
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00020-CV

In the Interest of C.C.M., C.M., C.C.M., C.C.M., Children

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law of Aransas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A-19-7002-FL

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant although she is exempt from payment due to her affidavit of inability to 

pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 9, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 2, 1997.
    Time: 8 a.m.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Lawrence E. Chaitkin, Parklawn, Room 9c-26, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-4843.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of person privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: November 6, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29848 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Meeting of the Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH, December 4, 1997, 
Conference Room 10, Building 31, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. to 
adjournment. The topics proposed for discussion include: (1) Center for 
Scientific Review; (2) Report from the Clinical Research Panel; (3) New 
Investigator Awards, Modular Awards, and Clinical Research Training; 
(4) Report from the Working Group on Research Tools; (5) Implementation 
of the Government Performance and Results Act; and (6) Report on the 
Review of Administrative Functions at NIH. Attendance by the public 
will be limited to space available.
    Ms. Janice Ramsden, Special Assistant to the Deputy Director, 
National Institutes of Health, 1 Center Drive MSC 0159, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892-0159, telephone (301) 496-0959, fax (301) 496-7451, will 
furnish the meeting agenda, roster of committee members, and available 
substantive program information upon request. Any individual who 
requires special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Ramsden no later 
than November 26, 1997.

    Dated: November 18, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-30931 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

Investment Company Act file number  811-5970

 

Cash Account Trust

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

222 South Riverside Plaza

Chicago, IL  60606

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 4/30 |
|--------------------------|------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 10/31/07 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

**Cash Account Trust**

**Service Shares**

Money Market Portfolio

Government & Agency Securities Portfolio

Tax-Exempt Portfolio

October 31, 2007

**This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. To obtain aprospectus for any of our funds, visit www.dws-scudder.com. We advise you toconsider a portfolio's objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully beforeinvesting. The prospectus contains this and other important information about aportfolio. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.**

*NOT FDIC/NCUA INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE*
#### Constance CACACE and Tito Cacace, her husband, Appellants, v. Paul STUPNER and Marilyn Stupner, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-748.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29963]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, November 17, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered:

    1. Proposed 1998 Federal Reserve Bank officer salary structure 
adjustments.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: November 7, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-29963 Filed 11-7-97; 5:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1801 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 

children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Ms. BROWNLEY (for herself, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. TONKO, Mr. RYAN, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. HAYES, and Mr. 

HASTINGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum age for children eligible for medical care under 

the CHAMPVA program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CHAMPVA Children’s 

5 Care Protection Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1801 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGI2 BLE FOR MEDICAL CARE UNDER CHAMPVA 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) INCREASE.—Subsection (c) of section 1781 of 

5 title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(c)(1) Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (iii) of sec8 tion 101(4)(A) of this title and except as provided in para9 graph (2), for purposes of this section, a child is eligible 

10 for benefits under subsection (a) until the child’s 26th 

11 birthday, regardless of the child’s marital status. 

12 ‘‘(2) This subsection shall not be construed to limit 

13 eligibility for benefits under subsection (a) of a child de14 scribed in section 101(4)(A)(ii) of this title.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Such subsection, as so 

16 amended, shall apply with respect to medical care provided 

17 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-51002

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANDY THOMAS SCHUMAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:09-CR-53-1

Before WIENER, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andy Schuman was serving separate terms of supervised release for two 

different drug convictions. One conviction was from 2003; the one in this case 

was from 2009. The district court found that he violated the conditions of 

release by using amphetamines and failing to comply with his drug treatment 

plan. In this case, the court sentenced him to a prison term of twelve months. 

That sentence would run consecutive to the ten-month sentence ordered in the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 10, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-51002 Document: 00515448238 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2020
No. 19-51002

2

other case. Schuman argues that the twelve-month sentence in this case was 

substantively unreasonable (the appeal of his revocation sentence in the other 

case was dismissed after counsel filed an Anders brief). 

Schuman contends this revocation sentence was unreasonably high

because his personal circumstances, specifically his substance abuse problem, 

did not warrant a consecutive twelve-month sentence. He also claims that the 

term was unnecessary to protect the public because his criminal history did 

not involve violence. But the district court considered Schuman’s

arguments for residential treatment and his defense that he was nonviolent. 

Schuman has not shown that the district court, when imposing the sentence, 

failed to consider a significant factor, considered an improper factor, or made 

a clear error of judgment in balancing the relevant factors. See United States 

v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 332 (5th Cir. 2013). Furthermore, his sentence was 

within the advisory range and therefore presumed reasonable. See United 

States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 2006). As such, he has not shown 

that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a substantively 

unreasonable sentence.1 See Warren, 720 F.3d at 332.

AFFIRMED.

1 The parties dispute whether Schuman’s appeal is subject to plain error review in 

light of Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 762, 766-67 (2020). It is unnecessary 

to determine whether plain error applies because Schuman cannot prevail even assuming he 

preserved his objection to the sentence. 

 Case: 19-51002 Document: 00515448238 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2020
#### Willie Lee ODOMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 5, 1974.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, James O. Brecher and Stephen H. Dono-hoe, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn N. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Williams v. State, 285 So.2d 13 (Fla.1973); and State v. Wilson, 276 So.2d 45 (Fla.1973).

RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
WILLIE VANDYKE WILSON, 

JR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-586

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 9, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joanna A. Mauer, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, without discussion, Appellant’s convictions and sentences for 

possession of a controlled substance; resisting a law enforcement officer without 

violence; and driving while license is cancelled, suspended or revoked – second 
2

conviction. However, we conclude, and the State properly concedes, the trial court 

erred by imposing a Public Defender lien of $150 without providing Appellant an 

opportunity to contest it. See §938.29(5), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1) 

(“Notice of the accused’s right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien shall be 

given at the time of sentence.”); see also Vaughn v. State, 65 So. 3d 138, 139 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2011) (“[T]he State properly concedes that the Public Defender lien fee 

should be stricken because the trial court did not advise [the defendant] of his right 

to a hearing to contest the amount of the fees.”). We therefore remand for the trial 

court to either strike the $150 Public Defender lien or give Appellant the opportunity 

to contest the amount of the lien. See Chestnut v. State, 145 So. 3d 193, 194 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2014).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                One Beacon Street
                                Boston, MA 02108

                                March 5, 2009


Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549


RE:      DWS Diversified International Equity Fund (the "Fund"), formerly known
         as DWS International Select Equity Fund, a series DWS Advisor Funds
         (the "Trust") (Reg. Nos. 33-07404, 811-04760)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
the Trust hereby certifies that the form of Prospectuses and Statements of
Additional Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Fund pursuant
to Rule 497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No. 168 to the
Trust's Registration Statement on form N-1A (the "Amendment"), do not differ
from that contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent Registration
Statement and was filed electronically on February 27, 2009.

         Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the
undersigned at (617) 295-3681.


                                Very truly yours,


                                 /s/Laura McCollum
                                 Laura McCollum
                                 Vice President
                                 Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.


cc:      John Marten, Esq., Vedder
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1968 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the foreign 

insurer excise tax certain insurance policies issued by United States 

territory and possession insurers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2021 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

from the foreign insurer excise tax certain insurance 

policies issued by United States territory and possession 

insurers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto Rico Insurance 

5 Excise Tax Exemption Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1968 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES ISSUED BY UNITED 

2 STATES TERRITORY AND POSSESSION INSUR3 ERS EXEMPT FROM FOREIGN INSURER EX4 CISE TAX. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4373 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS.—Any 

9 policy of insurance, indemnity bond, annuity con10 tract, or policy of reinsurance issued by a partner11 ship or corporation created or organized under the 

12 laws of any territory or possession of the United 

13 States, unless any of the hazards, risks, losses, or li14 abilities covered thereby are covered by a policy of 

15 reinsurance issued by a foreign insurer or reinsurer 

16 (other than such a partnership or corporation).’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to premiums paid after the date 

19 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS