alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harold W. STAYMAN, Appellant, v. Andree L. STAYMAN, Appellee.

No. 69-672.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 10, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1970.

Fred A. Jones, Jr., and Martin Blitstein, Miami, for appellant.

Lurie & Goethel, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the former husband from a judgment construing a property settlement agreement between the appellant and his wife, the appellee. The Court found:

> “5. The term *'net income’,*[in] the aforementioned Separation and Property *403Settlement Agreement, referring to the husband’s total net income, is found to mean the Respondent’s ‘total gross income less the actual expenses in earning said income. * * * ’ ”

No error has been shown. The trial court’s construction of the term as used in the property settlement agreement is in accordance with the ordinary meaning of the term and is consistent with the intention of the parties as drawn from the entire instrument. Cf. Bergman v. Bergman, 145 Fla. 10, 199 So. 920, 921 (1940).

Appellant relies upon the decision in Berry v. Berry, 50 Wash.2d 158, 310 P.2d 223 (1957), which we have examined and found to be inapplicable because of the wording of the agreement in that case.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32











CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL


OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Edwin Slater, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sandalwood Ventures, Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sandalwood Ventures, Ltd.





Date:  October 11, 2011





By:/s/ Edwin Slater


Edwin Slater,


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and


Principal Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit (h)(7)

**AMENDED AND RESTATED**

**ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT**

 

AGREEMENT, dated as of October 1, 2008, among DWS Money Funds, a Massachusetts business trust (the “Trust”), on its own behalf and on behalf of each of the Funds listed on Schedule I to this Agreement (each a “Fund” and together, the “Funds”), and Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Administrator”), effective with respect to each Fund as of the date set out with respect to such Fund on Schedule I to this Agreement, as may be amended from time to time.

WHEREAS, the Trust is engaged in business as an open-end investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”); 

WHEREAS, the Trust desires to retain the Administrator and its permitted designees to provide certain administrative and fund accounting (the “Services”) to the Trust and the Funds on the terms set out in this Agreement, and the Administrator and its designees are willing to provide the Services to the Trust and each Fund on the terms set out in this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Trust and the Administrator desire to amend and restate the Administrative Services Agreement dated May 1, 2008.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants contained in this Agreement, the Trust, each Fund, and the Administrator agree as follows:

|   | 1. | *Appointment and Services*. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------|

(a)       The Trust appoints the Administrator to provide the administrative services set out in Appendix A to this Agreement (the “Administrative Services”) for the benefit of the Trust and the Funds.  The Administrator accepts its appointment and agrees to provide the Administrative Services for the compensation set out in this Agreement.

(b)       The Trust appoints the Administrator to provide the fund accounting services set out in Appendix B to this Agreement (the “Fund Accounting Services”) for the benefit of the Trust and the Funds.  The Administrator accepts its appointment and agrees to provide the Fund Accounting Services for the compensation set out in this Agreement.

|   | 2. | *Fees*. |
|--------|----|---------|

(a)       For all Administrative Services and Fund Accounting Services provided under this Agreement, the Administrator will be compensated as set out on Appendix C.  

(b)       The Administrator may from time to time agree not to impose all or a portion of its fee otherwise payable under this Agreement and/or undertake to pay or reimburse the Trust for all or a portion of its expenses not otherwise required to be paid by or reimbursed by the Administrator.  Unless otherwise agreed, any fee reduction or 

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0116 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JACOB TYLER POWELL ,

Defendant a nd Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 26 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 17 2024

06/17/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0116
|    | (1)       | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         |  (2) |  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                                          |

|   | By:          | /s/ Robert Bertrand              |
|--------|--------------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Name:   | Robert Bertrand                       |
|   | Title:  | President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |         | (Principal Financial Officer)         |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Gas Company for
the nine months ended September 30, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000022620
<NAME> COMMONWEALTH GAS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          253,278
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>              0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              59,833
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            24,211
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     337,322
<COMMON>                            71,425
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,739
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                    367
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      99,531
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                91,750
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                       0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>        3,650
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     142,391
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      337,322
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          217,861
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 3,390
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         199,959
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         203,349
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             14,512
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     927
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      15,439
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             9,338
<NET-INCOME>                         6,101
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        6,101
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            12,571
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            6,147
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              61,079
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Donald Lynn Collins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Collins Industries, Inc., certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: | September 7, 2004 |                               
|------ | ----------------- | ------------------------------
|       |                   |                               
|       | By                |                               
|       |                   | /s/ Donald Lynn Collins       
|       |                   | Donald Lynn Collins, President
|       |                   | and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1726 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1726

To provide that an order or action by the President or the Secretary of 
  the Interior imposing a moratorium on oil and gas leasing shall not 
         take effect without the express approval of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2021

 Mr. Young (for himself, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Gosar, Mr. McClintock, Mr. 
 Rosendale, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Obernolte, Mr. 
  Westerman, Mr. Stauber, and Mrs. Boebert) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that an order or action by the President or the Secretary of 
  the Interior imposing a moratorium on oil and gas leasing shall not 
         take effect without the express approval of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``America Needs Worthwhile Resources 
Act'' or the ``ANWR Act''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF ORDERS.

    Any order or action by the President or the Secretary of the 
Interior that has the effect of placing a moratorium on oil and gas 
leasing in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge shall have no force or 
effect unless--
            (1) the order or action is submitted to Congress; and
            (2) a joint resolution that approves the order or action is 
        enacted by Congress.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charlie SIAS, Jr. v. GULF TUNG CORP., Rafe Silverstein, Jr. and Associated Pipeline Contractors, Inc.

No. 62358.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Charlie Sias, Jr. applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of St. Tammany.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,426
<PP&E>                                          15,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,874
<SALES>                                         63,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,067
<CGS>                                           20,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (50)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,856)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,469)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,469)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.61)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

FORREST M. JOHNSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-4308 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 7, 2015.

A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Charles B. Curry, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

CASANUEVA, Judge. We affirm Forrest M. Johnson's judgment and sentence in this A nders 1 appeal. However, we remand for the trial court to correct an a pparent scrivener's error in the order revoking probation.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).- 2 - Johnson admitted to violating his probation, and his probation was revoked based on the violations set forth in an amended affidav it of probation. The amended affidavit alleged nine violations, including a violatio n of condition three for changing his residence without the consent of the probation off icer. The order of revocation tracks the violations alleged in the amended affidav it but includes a violation of condition thirteen, failure to report within seventy-two hou rs of release, and no

violation of condition three. No violation of condition thirte en was alleged or otherwise at issue. Thus, it appears the trial court intended to include a violation of condition three, not condition thirteen, in its order. Accordingly, we a ffirm Johnson's judgment

and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the orde r revoking probation.

Affirmed and remanded.

DAVIS, C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., Concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Proteonomix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Kohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 27, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-49-000]


K N Wattenberg Transmission LLC; Notice of Site Visit

November 12, 1997.
    On November 19, 1997, the Office of Pipeline Regulation (OPR) staff 
will conduct an inspection of the route proposed by K N Wattenberg 
Transmission Limited Liability Company (KNW) for its Front Runner 
Pipeline. The proposed route, crossing portions of Weld and Adams 
Counties, Colorado, will be inspected from a helicopter and/or an 
automobile. The aerial inspection will begin at Centennial Airport in 
south Denver, at 8:00 a.m. If weather conditions preclude an aerial 
inspection, a ground inspection will be conducted using an automobile 
originating at a location to be determined. Representatives of KNW will 
accompany the OPR staff.
    All interested parties may attend, although those planning to 
attend must provide their own transportation.
    For further information, please contact Paul McKee of the 
Commission's Office of External Affairs at 202-208-1088.
Robert J. Cupina,
Deputy Director, Office of Pipeline Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-30234 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NUMBER 13-23-00258-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN RE JOSHUA THORNTON

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides1

On June 15, 2023, relator Joshua Thornton filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

through which he asserts that the district court2 abused its discretion by failing to comply 

with the procedural requirements of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and 

Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) before making a final determination of jurisdiction. See TEX.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 

47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

2 This original proceeding arises from trial court cause number F-404-10-1 in County Court at Law 

Number 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas, and the respondent is the Honorable Rodolfo Rudy Gonzalez, who is 

the acting judge for the case. See id. R. 52.2. 
2

FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 152.001–.317. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

Mandamus is an extraordinary and discretionary remedy. See In re Allstate Indem. 

Co., 622 S.W.3d 870, 883 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836, 

840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 

S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The relator must show that (1) the trial 

court abused its discretion, and (2) the relator lacks an adequate remedy on appeal. In re 

USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 624 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 135–36; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 

839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). “The relator bears the burden of proving these two 

requirements.” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. 

proceeding) (per curiam); Walker; 827 S.W.2d at 840.

The Court, having fully examined and considered the petition for writ of mandamus, 

the response filed by the real party in interest, the record, and the applicable law, is of the 

opinion that relator has failed to meet his burden to obtain relief. Accordingly, we lift the 

stay previously imposed in this case, and we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8, 52.10.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

3rd day of July, 2023.
#### S. J. CHARIA, d/b/a S. J. Charia & Company and Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Russell L. STANLEY, Oscar Foland, Jewel Aigner Wainwright, Maurice Arnod Granet, Maria K. Granet, Henry L. Granet, Nicole S. Friedlander and Mau Mar, Inc., and Carrollton Lumber & Wrecking Co., Inc., its agents, et al.

No. 62669.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: S. J. Charia and Hartford Fire Insurance Company, applying for certiorari, *580or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 359 So.2d 291.

Writ denied. Under the facts of this case the result is correct.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the annual report of Loncor Resources Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donat K. Madilo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|March 31, 2014 | /s/ Donat K. Madilo     | 
|-------------- | ----------------------- | 
|               | Donat K. Madilo        
|               | Chief Financial Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Loncor Resources Inc. and will be retained by Loncor Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Harry HOROWITZ, on behalf of Meridian 17 Corp., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED INVESTORS CORPORATION, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-694.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.