alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby D. GLOVER.

No. 62348.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Bobby D. Glover applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
#### Jefferson Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, *vs.*St. Mary’s Seminary, Appellant.

1. Washington Mut. Fire Ins. Co. ys. St. Mary’s Seminary, *ante,*p. 480 affirmed.

*Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.*

*Daniel*Dillon, for Appellant.

*W. H.*Horner, for Respondent.

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is on all fours with that of the Washington Mutual Fire Insurance Co., decided at the present term, and for

like reasons the judgment herein will also be affirmed.

Judge Wagner absent. The other Judges concur.
#### Arthur WHITEHILL, Appellant, v. August J. GRADER, Mayor, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1192.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 27, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 932]


Voluntary Relinquishment of the Grant of Authority Foreign-Trade 
Zone 188, Yakima, Washington

    Pursuant to the authority granted in the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board has adopted the following order:
    Whereas, on November 30, 1992, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board 
issued a grant of authority to the Yakima Air Terminal Board, 
authorizing the establishment of Foreign-Trade Zone 188 at the Yakima 
International Airport, in Yakima, Washington (Board Order 606, 57 FR 
58457, 12/10/92);
    Whereas, the Yakima Air Terminal Board has made a request (FTZ Doc. 
#37-97, 3-31-97) to the FTZ Board for voluntary relinquishment of the 
grant of authority for FTZ 188, and;
    Whereas, the FTZ Board, noting the concurrence of the U.S. Customs 
Service, adopts the findings of the FTZ staff report and concludes that 
approval of the request is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Foreign-Trade Zones Board terminates the FTZ 
status of Foreign-Trade Zone No. 188 effective this date.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of November, 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30700 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Charles JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-602.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Michael H. Oritt, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Carroll v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 834.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29324]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TQ98-1-35-000]


West Texas Gas, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

October 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 29, 1997, West Texas Gas, Inc. (WTG), 
submitted for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to be effective November 1, 
1997:

Twenty-Fifth Revised Sheet No. 4

    WTG states that the tariff sheet and the accompanying explanatory 
schedules constitute an out-of-cycle PGA filing submitted pursuant to 
the purchased gas adjustment provisions of Section 19, of the General 
Terms and Conditions of its tariff. WYG states that copies of the 
filing were served upon its customers and affected state commissions.
    WTG request the Commission to accept the proposed tariff sheet, 
which reflects an increase of $1,2399 per Mcf in its cost of gas, to be 
effective November 1, 1997. According to WTG, its gas costs have 
increased sharply due to substantial recent increases in the spot price 
of gas. To prevent the accumulation of a significant level of costs in 
its deferred account, WTG requests the Commission to shorten or waive 
the 30-day notice period to permit a prompt adjustment to is sales 
rates.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29324 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           5,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,034
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,089
<PP&E>                                          18,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,153
<BONDS>                                          2,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               27
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,592)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,363
<SALES>                                         16,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,480
<CGS>                                           14,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,536)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (590)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2232-321]


Duke Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

February 3, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing (OHL) has reviewed Duke Power Company's 
application for granting an increase in water withdrawal from the 
Catawba-Wateree Project to the Lugoff-Elgin Water Authority (Lugoff-
Elgin) of Kershaw County, South Carolina, located on Lake Wateree in 
the Santee River Basin. The proposal would grant permission to Lugoff-
Elgin to: (1) increase its water withdrawal from Lake Wateree from an 
existing 3 million gallons per day (mgd) to up to 10 mgd; (2) replace 
one existing water intake pump with two 60 horsepower pumps; and (3) 
construct a new 12-inch water line within the project boundary to 
replace the existing 10-inch water intake line. The proposed expansion 
of the pumping facility would increase the existing plant capacity from 
3.0 mgd to 4.0 mgd initially. However, Lugoff-Elgin requests authority 
to increase water withdrawals up to 10 mgd over the next 20 years based 
on estimates of the demand in the service area.
    The staff of OHL's Division of Licensing and Compliance has 
prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed action. In 
the EA, the Commission's staff has analyzed the environmental impacts 
of the proposed project and has concluded that approval of the 
licensee's proposal would not constitute a major federal action 
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2A of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, D.C. 20426 or by calling the Commission's Public Reference 
Room at (202) 208-1371.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3061 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS High Income Trust, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| July 30, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark   |
|---------------|-----------------------|
|          | Michael G. Clark      |
|          | President             |
|          | DWS High Income Trust |

 

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS High Income Trust, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| July 30, 2009 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|---------------|---------------------------------------|
|          | Paul Schubert                         |
|          | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|          | DWS High Income Trust                 |
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 195 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 195

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar 
 limitation on employer-provided group term life insurance that can be 
            excluded from the gross income of the employee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2021

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar 
 limitation on employer-provided group term life insurance that can be 
            excluded from the gross income of the employee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Group Term Life Insurance Increase 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP 
              TERM LIFE INSURANCE PURCHASED FOR EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 79(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting 
``$375,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 79 of such Code is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Inflation Adjustment.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
        beginning after 2021, the $375,000 amount under subsection 
        (a)(1) shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `2020' for `2016' in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
            ``(2) Rounding.--If any amount as adjusted under paragraph 
        (1) is not a multiple of $10,000, such amount shall be rounded 
        to the nearest multiple of $10,000.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Florida Municipal Corporation, and Elaine Matthews, City Clerk of Miami Beach, Florida, Appellants, v. MR. SAMUEL’S INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 75-816.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 7, 1977.

Joseph A. Wanick, City Atty., for appellants.

Moran & Gold, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on April 6, 1976 (334 So.2d 47) affirming the final judgment issuing the peremptory writ of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed October 27, 1977, 351 So.2d 719, and *931mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions to remand to the trial court for discharge of the Writ of Mandamus.

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on July 6, 1976 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed April 6, 1976 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the Writ of Mandamus is discharged. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16b, Florida Appellate Rules).
----

| RE: | Tasman Metals Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2014 (the "Annual Report") and Management's Discussion and Analysis for the Year Ended August 31, 2014 (the "2014 MD&A"). |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1. | The amended and restated technical report entitled "Amended and Restated Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Norra Kärr (REE - Y - Zr) Deposit, Gränna, Sweden" dated July 9, 2013, which we prepared (the "Norra Kärr PEA Report"); and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report, Norra Karr REE - Zirconium Deposit, Granna, Sweden" dated January 20, 2011, which we prepared  (the "Technical Report"). |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit (p)(2)

|   | **THE CODE OF ETHICS** |
|--------|------------------------|

**OF**

**NORTHERN TRUST INVESTMENTS, N.A.**

 

This Code of Ethics (the “Code”) has been adopted by Northern Trust Investments, N.A. (“NTI”) in compliance with Rule 17j-1(c)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) and Rule 204A-1 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”).

 

The purpose of the Code is to establish general principles governing the conduct of NTI employees in connection with NTI’s services as an investment adviser and to establish procedures to enhance compliance with those general principles.

 

| **I.** | **General Principles** |
|--------|------------------------|

 

These principles emphasize NTI’s fiduciary duty to clients and the obligation of NTI employees to uphold that fundamental duty.

 

All NTI directors, officers and employees are subject to the following:

 

|   | A. | The duty at all times to place the interests of clients first; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | B. | The requirement that all personal securities transactions be conducted in such a manner as to be consistent with this Code and to avoid any actual or potential conflict of interest or any abuse of an employee’s position of trust and responsibility; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | C. | The principle that NTI employees should not take inappropriate advantage of their positions; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | D. | The fiduciary principle that information concerning the identity of security holdings and financial circumstances of clients is confidential; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | E. | The principle that independence in the investment decision-making process is paramount; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | F. | The duty to preserve NTI’s reputation for honesty, integrity, and professionalism. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

These general principles govern the conduct of all directors, officers, and employees of NTI, whether or not the conduct also is covered by more specific standards and procedures set forth below.

 

Failure to comply with this Code may result in disciplinary action, including termination of employment.

 

----
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Albert P. SCHWARZ, Respondent.

No. 52681.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 16, 1978.

John A. Weiss, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for complainant.

Gilbert Bentley, Maitland, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

On February 12, 1976, counsel for The Florida Bar filed a complaint charging Respondent with violating Disciplinary Rules 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(l), 7-101(A)(2) and 7-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for failing to carry out a contract of employment with his client and for prejudicing or damaging his client in the course of the professional relationship.

On March 31, 1977, Respondent executed a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment in which he admitted the allegations of the complaint.

The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar approved the conditional guilty plea subject to this Court’s approval.

The conditional guilty plea is hereby approved and the following discipline imposed:

a. A public reprimand to be published in the Southern Reporter.

*777b. Probation not to exceed three years, the probation to terminate upon respondent’s submission of four quarterly status reports in succession.

c. Payment of $187.00 for costs incurred by The Florida Bar in bringing these disciplinary proceedings.

The publication of this opinion shall serve as the public reprimand.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
                                 One Beacon Street
                                 Boston, MA 02108

                                 December 3, 2008



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549



RE:      DWS International Fund and DWS International Value Opportunities Fund
         (the "Funds"), each a series of DWS International Fund, Inc. (the
         "Corporation"); (Reg. Nos. 02-14400 and 811-00642)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the
Corporation hereby certifies that the form of Prospectuses and Statements of
Additional Information that would have been filed on behalf of the Funds
pursuant to Rule 497(c) upon the effectiveness of Post-Effective Amendment No.
113 to the Corporation's Registration Statement on form N-1A (the "Amendment"),
do not differ from that contained in the Amendment, which is the most recent
Registration Statement and was filed electronically on December 1, 2008.


Any comments or questions on this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (617) 295-3986.

                                    Very truly yours,


                                    /s/Scott D. Hogan
                                    Scott D. Hogan
                                    Vice President
                                    Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.

cc:      Adam Schlichtmann, Esq., Ropes & Gray
254 La. 747

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edward WARD.

No. 50083.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 24, 1969.

In re: Edward Ward applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original, or supervisory jurisdiction.