# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 36 1 . ANTHONY LOW REY v . THE STATE.

On Ap ri l 8

, 2 0 1 5, An t ho ny Lo wrey fi led a p ro s e ap p l icat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal

, seek i ng rev i ew o f an o rd er rev o k i n g h i s p ro b at i o n

. Al t h o u g h h e m en t i o n s a

2 0 1 4 p ro b at i o n rev o cat i o n

, th e o n l y o rd er in cl ud ed wi t h h i s ap p l icat i o n i s a p ro b at i o n

rev o cat i on o rd er s i gn ed o n J an u ary 4 , 2 0 1 1 . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

To b e v al i d

, an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i scre t i o n a r y ap peal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0

d ay s aft er t h e en try o f t h e ap p eal ab l e o rd er, an d t hi s Co urt l ack s ju ri s d i ct i o n to

co n si d er an u n t i m el y ap p l i cat io n

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ); Hi l l v. S ta te

, 20 4 Ga. Ap p.

5 8 2 (4 2 0 SE2 d 39 3 ) (1 99 2 ). Here, t h e o n l y o rd er Lo wrey i n cl u ded w i t h hi s 2 0 1 5

ap p li cat io n m at eri al s was s i g n ed b y t h e ju dg e i n 2 0 1 1

. Ho wev er, i t was n o t a s t am p ed

“ fi l ed ” co p y

, as req u ired by Co u rt o f A p p eal s Ru l e 3 1 (e). A s t am p ed “ fi l ed ” co py

i s req u i red i n o rd er fo r t h i s Co u rt t o as cert ai n t h at t h e ap p li cat i o n was fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0

d ay s aft er en t ry of t h e ap peal ab l e o rd er

. O n A p r i l 1 4

, 2 0 1 5

, t hi s Co u rt o rd ered

Lo wrey t o s u p p lem en t h i s ap pl i cat io n wi t h i n 10 d ay s wi th a s t am p ed “ fi l ed ” co p y o f

t h e o rd er t o b e ap peal ed

. W e n o t ed th at fai l ure t o co m p l y w it h t h i s di rect i v e wo u ld

res u l t i n di s m i s s al o f t h e ap p l i cat i on

. Lo wrey fai led to su b m it a s t am p ed “ fi l ed ” co py

o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er w i t hi n t h e ad d i t i o n al t i m e al lo wed

. Acco rd i n g l y

, t h i s

ap p li cat io n i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

W e no t e, ho wev er, t h at Lo wrey co nt en d s h e i s u n ab l e t o co m p l y wi t h Co u rt o f

Ap p eal s Ru l e 3 1 (e) b ecau s e t h e t ri al co u rt fai l ed t o p ro v i d e h i m wi t h a co p y o f h i s

2 0 1 4 o rd er. If Lo wrey d i d n o t recei v e t i m el y n ot ice o f t h e o rd er, h i s rem ed y i s to

p et i t i o n t h e t ri al c o u r t t o v acat e an d re-en t er t h e o rd er as a m ean s o f co rrect i n g t h e

p ro b lem . See i d .; Ca mb r on v. Ca n a l In s. Co

. , 2 46 Ga. 1 4 7 , 1 4 8-1 4 9 (1 ) (2 6 9 SE2 d May 06, 20154 2 6 ) (1 98 0 ). Th e re-en t ry o f t h e o rd er wi ll b eg i n an ew t h e t i m e fo r fi li n g a no t i ce o f

ap p eal i n t he t ri al co u rt . See Ca mb r o n , s u p ra.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/06/2015