alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

FAUSTINO GONZALES, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10237 

D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00248-WBS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 22, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Faustino Gonzales appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion 

for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The court assumed that 

Gonzales was statutorily eligible for a sentence reduction due to Amendment 782 

to the Guidelines, but concluded that a reduction was not warranted under the 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 29 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-10237

circumstances. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

discretionary denials of sentence reduction motions for abuse of discretion, see 

United States v. Chaney, 581 F.3d 1123, 1125 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm. 

Gonzales first contends that the court abused its discretion by relying on a 

2012-2013 prison disciplinary record to find that he posed a danger to public 

safety. The district court was permitted to consider such post-sentencing conduct 

when ruling on Gonzalez’s motion, see U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.1(B), and 

Gonzalez has not demonstrated that the district court’s factual findings or 

inferences drawn from those records were clearly erroneous, see United States v. 

Mercado-Moreno, 869 F.3d 942, 953 (9th Cir. 2017). 

Gonzales also argues that the court failed to (1) consider all the 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, and (2) address explicitly Gonzales’s argument that 

he did not pose a risk to public safety. It is apparent from the court’s statements 

and the record as a whole that the court properly considered the section 3553(a) 

factors, as well as Gonzales’s arguments, in rendering its decision. The court was 

not required to provide a more detailed explanation of its reasoning. See ChavezMeza v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1959, 1966 (2018) (“[T]he judge need not 

provide a lengthy explanation if the context and the record make clear that the 

judge had a reasoned basis for [its decision]”) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

AFFIRMED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4837

_____________________________

JOHN FRANCES,

Appellant,

v.

BAYOU BREEZE CONDOMINIUM 

a/k/a PENSACOLA EXECUTIVE 

HOUSE CONDOMINIUM, INC.; ITS 

OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, AGENTS,

SERVANTS, and/or EMPLOYEES 

individually and/or in their 

official capacities; CHARLES D.

CROSS; BOBBY J. TRAMMEL; and

KATHIE W. PETKOVIC,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

March 29, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

John Frances, pro se, for Appellant.

Sharon Delene Regan, Pensacola, for Appellees.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1869 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to make 

a technical correction to the water rights settlement for the ShoshonePaiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2021 

Mr. AMODEI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to make a technical correction to the water rights 

settlement for the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck 

Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Technical Correction 

5 to the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Res6 ervation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1869 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON 

2 TRUST FUNDS ESTABLISHED UNDER SETTLE3 MENT. 

4 Section 10807 of the Omnibus Public Land Manage5 ment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1408) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)(3)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(B) INTEREST PAYMENTS.—There is au13 thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for 

14 deposit into the Development Fund the interest 

15 that would have accrued during the period be16 ginning on October 1, 2009, and ending on 

17 January 25, 2016, on balances held in the De18 velopment Fund, as calculated using the appli19 cable rate for interest-bearing obligations of the 

20 United States if the amounts in the Develop21 ment Fund had been invested in accordance 

22 with— 

23 ‘‘(i) the Act of April 1, 1880 (21 Stat. 

24 70, chapter 41; 25 U.S.C. 161); and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1869 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the first section of the Act of 

2 June 24, 1938 (52 Stat. 1037, chapter 

3 648; 25 U.S.C. 162a).’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (c)(3)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

8 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(B) INTEREST PAYMENTS.—There is au10 thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for 

11 deposit into the Maintenance Fund the interest 

12 that would have accrued during the period be13 ginning on October 1, 2009, and ending on 

14 January 25, 2016, on balances held in the 

15 Maintenance Fund, as calculated using the ap16 plicable rate for interest-bearing obligations of 

17 the United States if the amounts in the Mainte18 nance Fund had been invested in accordance 

19 with— 

20 ‘‘(i) the Act of April 1, 1880 (21 Stat. 

21 70, chapter 41; 25 U.S.C. 161); and 

22 ‘‘(ii) the first section of the Act of 

23 June 24, 1938 (52 Stat. 1037, chapter 

24 648; 25 U.S.C. 162a).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1997 FORM 10-QSB AS RESTATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FASB 128, WHICH WAS ADOPTED
DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                            0000021828
<NAME>                           COLONIAL COMMERCIAL CORP.
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                 855,600
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        8,398,207
<ALLOWANCES>                           397,690
<INVENTORY>                          1,102,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    10,343,723
<PP&E>                                 288,086
<DEPRECIATION>                         159,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      15,059,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                6,041,410
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                             83,733
<COMMON>                                71,131
<OTHER-SE>                           7,968,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        15,059,233
<SALES>                             12,016,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    12,016,960
<CGS>                                9,106,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        9,106,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       135,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     152,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        235,244
<INCOME-TAX>                            60,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    175,244
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           175,244
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .06
        





                                  


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**Daily Assets Fund Institutional, DWS Commodity Securities Fund,**

**DWS Inflation Protected Plus Fund, Cash Management Fund Institutional,**

**Cash Reserves Fund Institutional, DWS EAFE Equity Index Fund, DWS Equity 500 Index Fund and DWS U.S. Bond Index Fund**

**Each a Series of DWS Institutional Funds**

Investment Company Act file number  811-06071

DWS Institutional Funds

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  06/30

Daily Assets Fund Institutional

DWS Commodity Securities Fund 

Date of fiscal year end:  09/30

DWS Inflation Protected Plus Fund

Date of fiscal year end:  12/31

Cash Management Fund Institutional

Cash Reserves Fund Institutional

DWS EAFE Equity Index Fund

DWS Equity 500 Index Fund

DWS U.S. Bond Index Fund

Date of reporting period:  7/1/08-6/30/09

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30538]



[[Page 62073]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to The Clean Air Act 
(``CAA'')

    Consistent with the policy set forth in the Department of Justice 
regulations at 28 C.F.R. Sec. 50.7, notice is hereby given that on 
October 30, 1997, a proposed Consent Decree was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany 
Division, in United States v. Essroc Cement Corporation (``ESSROC''), 
Cause No. NA 97-130-C-H/G, settling claims asserted by the United 
States, on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 
pursuant to Section 113 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9613. The 
claims arose in connection with operation of ESSROC's portland cement 
manufacturing facility in Speed, Indiana.
    The Consent Decree requires ESSROC to pay $300,000 in civil 
penalties for alleged violation of the particulate matter and opacity 
emission limitations and other provisions in the New Source Performance 
Standards (``NSPS'') for Portland Cement Plants at 40 CFR Part 60, 
Subpart F and the NSPS General Provisions at 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart 
A. The Decree also requires compliance with certain NSPS requirements 
for reporting excess emissions, found at 50 CFR Secs. 60.13(h), 
60.7(c)(1) and 60.63(d).
    The Department of Justice will receive written comments relating to 
the proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Comments should be directed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Essroc Cement Corporation, DOJ Reference # 90-5-2-1-
2090.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, U.S. 
Courthouse, 5th Floor, 46 East Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 
46204, at the Region V offices of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, and at the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library. In 
requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $2.25 (25 
cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Bruck S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 97-30538 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #34 – 7.04 Enrolled Actuary Information 

Does the application include the required enrolled actuary information? See section 7.04. 

Document 34.1 provides the required enrolled actuary information. 
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #34 – 7.04 Enrolled Actuary Information 

34.1 

Document 34.1 

Enrolled Actuary Information 

Name of Actuary: Paul Bullock, ASA, EA, MAAA 

Enrollment Number: 

Contact Information: 

Address: United Actuarial Services, Inc. 

11590 North Meridian Street, Suite 610 

Carmel, Indiana 46032-4529

Phone: (317) 580-8652 

Fax: (317) 580-8651 

Email: pbullock@unitedactuarial.com 

Redacted by the U.S. 

Department of the
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                        35
<INVENTORY>                                      3,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,600
<PP&E>                                           3,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,217
<BONDS>                                            333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           697
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,044
<SALES>                                          5,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,548
<CGS>                                            2,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    861
<INCOME-TAX>                                       357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                504
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
Program Fact Sheet

Background

In February 2010, US Treasury (Treasury) created the “Housing Finance Agency (HFA) Innovation Fund 

for the Hardest-Hit Housing Markets” (HFA Hardest-Hit Fund) and allocated funds under the Emergency 

Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) to five states: Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan and 

Nevada. The funds were allocated to these states because of their excessive housing market

depreciation and to assist in foreclosure prevention efforts. In March 2010, Treasury allocated a second 

disbursement of $600 million to an additional five state HFAs based on high unemployment rates. On 

August 11, Treasury again expanded the HFA Hardest-Hit Fund to include a total of 18 states and the 

District of Columbia, and added an additional $2 billion. Florida received another allocation of funds, 

$236.8 million, from the third round of funding, which added to the initial allocation of $418 million, 

brought Florida’s total funding to $656.8 million. Most recently, on September 29, 2010, Treasury 

announced a fourth round of funding, awarding Florida an additional $401 million; this brings Florida’s 

total award amount to more than $1 billion. 

Current Programs

Florida Housing Finance Corporation (Florida Housing) was directed by Treasury to use a portion of these 

funds specifically for targeted unemployment programs that provide temporary assistance to eligible 

homeowners.

These targeted unemployment programs—collectively known as the Florida Hardest-Hit Fund (HHF) 

program—are as follows:

• Unemployment Mortgage Assistance Program (UMAP) will provide up to 12 months of payments

(with a cap of $24,000) to the mortgage lender to assist unemployed or underemployed borrowers 

with their first mortgage until they can resume full payments on their own. In addition, up to $18,000 

can be paid up-front to reinstate a delinquent first mortgage before UMAP payments commence. 

Total assistance available is up to $42,000.

• Mortgage Loan Reinstatement Payment (MLRP) Program will be used as a one-time payment to 

bring a delinquent mortgage current (up to $25,000) for a homeowner who has returned to work or 

recovered from underemployment.

Florida homeowners may apply for HHF assistance using the web-based, online system at 

www.FLHardestHitHelp.org. The site contains all the information a homeowner needs to apply, including 

detailed eligibility criteria, step-by-step prompts, FAQs, etc.

The Florida HHF program began in October 2010 with a pilot implemented in Lee County; the program 

opened statewide on April 18, 2011. Revisions to Florida HHF eligibility criteria and program benefits 

were implemented in June 2012.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains restated summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated statement of income and consolidated balance sheet
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000021212
<NAME> COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,020
<SECURITIES>                                    32,424
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                       956
<INVENTORY>                                    108,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,535
<PP&E>                                         119,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,320
<BONDS>                                          8,766
<COMMON>                                        45,118
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,510
<SALES>                                        640,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               640,338
<CGS>                                          553,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  603,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,587)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,452
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,756
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30187]



[[Page 61501]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-163-007]


Westgas Interstate, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 12, 1997.
    Take notice that November 6, 1997, WestGas InterState, Inc. (WGI), 
tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Tariff Sheet No. 29A and Substitute 
First Revised Sheet No. 92, with a proposed effective date of November 
1, 1997.
    WGI states that these tariff sheets are being filed to comply with 
the Letter Order issued on October 22, 1997, by the Director, Office of 
Pipeline Regulation, in Docket No. RP97-163-005. In that Letter Order, 
the Director accepted WGI's tariff sheets filed October 2, 1997, to 
comply with the Commission's September 22, 1997 ``Order on Compliance 
Filing,'' subject to WGI refiling tariff sheets to reflect certain 
minor modifcations. WGI states that the above tariff sheets incorporate 
the modifications as directed in the October 22, 1997 Letter Order.
    WGI further states that copies of this filing have been served on 
WGI's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30187 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M