alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61485-61486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Newspapers Used for Publication of Legal Notice of Appealable 
Decisions for the Northern Region; Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and 
Portions of South Dakota and Eastern Washington

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the newspapers that will be used by all 
Ranger Districts, Forests, and the Regional Office of the Northern 
Region to publish legal notice of all decisions subject to appeal under 
36 CFR 215 and 217 and to publish notices for public comment and notice 
of decision subject to the provisions of 36 CFR 215. The intended 
effect of this action is to inform interested members of the public 
which newspapers will be used to publish legal notices for public 
comment or decisions; thereby allowing them to receive constructive 
notice of a decision, to provide clear evidence of timely notice, and 
to achieve consistency in administering the appeals process.

DATES: Publication of legal notices in the listed newspapers will begin 
with decisions subject to appeal that are made on or after November 15, 
1997. The list of newspapers will remain in effect until another notice 
is published in the Federal Register.


[[Page 61486]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristine M. Lee; Regional Appeals and 
Litigation Coordinator, Northern Region; P.O. Box 7669; Missoula, 
Montana 59807. Phone: (406) 329-3647.
    The newspapers to be used are as follows:

Northern Regional Office

Regional Forester decisions in Montana:
The Missoulian, Great Falls Tribune, and The Billings Gazette.
Regional Forester decisions in Northern Idaho and Eastern Washington:
The Spokesman Review.
Regional Forester decisions in North Dakota: Bismarck Tribune.
Regional Forester decisions in South Dakota: Rapid City Journal.
Beaverhead/Deerlodge--Montana Standard.
Bitterroot--Ravalli Republic.
Clearwater--Lewiston Morning Tribune.
Custer--Billings Gazette (Montana), Bismarck Tribune (North Dakota), 
Rapid City Journal (South Dakota).
Flathead--Daily Interlake.
Gallatin--Bozeman Chronicle.
Helena--Independent Record.
Idaho Panhandle--Spokesman Review.
Kootenai--Daily Interlake.
Lewis & Clark--Great Falls Tribune.
Lolo--Missoulian.
Nez Perce--Lewiston Morning Tribune.

    Supplemental notices may be placed in any newspaper, but time 
frames/deadlines will be calculated based upon notices in newspapers of 
record listed above.

    Dated: November 7, 1997.
Kathleen A. McAllister,
Deputy Regional Forester.
[FR Doc. 97-30199 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
# CL 2016
#### Charles PINKNEY, Petitioner, v. Hon. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of corrections, Respondent.

No. 73-738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer
Horizons Corp. (the "COMPANY") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
(the "PERIODIC REPORT"), I, John J. Cassese, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

  Date: August 14, 2002                              /s/ John J. Cassese
        ---------------                              ---------------------
                                                     John J. Cassese
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                       25
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Registrant”) for the annual period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross A. Teune, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Ross A. TeuneName: Ross A. TeuneTitle:  Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 28, 2018
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Bin LaurenceName:
    Bin LaurenceTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 2 8 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk April 2 8 , 2021

160 958

- 9 ( 1 12 )

DENISHIO JOHNSON,

P laintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 160958

v COA: 330536

Kent CC: 14

- 007226

- NO

CURT VANDERKOOI, ELLIOT BARGAS,

and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS,

Defendants

- Appellees.

__________ ______________________________

KEYON HARRISON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 160959

v COA: 330537

Kent CC: 14

- 002166

- NO

CURT VANDERKOOI and CITY OF GRAND

RAPIDS,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

_______ ______________________________ ___ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs

- appellant s to extend the time

for filing t heir brief on appeal i s GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before May 2 1 , 2021

.
1 

Individual Estimate of Effect of Proposed Reduction in Benefits 

December 28, 2015 

NAME 

ADDRESS 

CITY, STATE ZIP

How the Proposed Reduction in Benefits Would Affect You 

It is estimated that if the proposed reductions are not implemented, then the Plan is projected to be 

insolvent and unable to pay benefits when due in 2029. If the Plan becomes insolvent, your benefit 

would be reduced to the monthly PBGC-guaranteed level. Your estimated monthly PBGCguaranteed level is $429.00. 

Your accrued monthly benefit of $1,770.00 will not change under the proposed reduction.

Information Used in Calculating the Estimated Benefit Reduction 

This is an estimate of your benefit under the proposed reduction. It is not a final benefit calculation. 

This estimate of the proposed reduction is based on an assumed effective date of October 1, 2016 

(this date may be subject to change). If the proposed reduction is effective at a later date, then the 

amount of the reduction to your benefit might change. 

This estimate is also based on the following information: 

Years of Service 

 

Plan records show that you have 12.000 years of Contribution Service under the Plan. 

Age as of the Effective Date of the Proposed Reduction 

Plan records show that you will be 61.000 years old as of the end of the month of the effective date 

of the proposed reduction. 

Disability Benefits 

Plan records show that the portion of your benefit that is based on disability is $1,770.00. 

PLAN OFFICE CONTACT INFORMATION 

If you believe the information used to calculate your estimate is incorrect, please contact the Plan 

office at 3400 Highway 35, Suite 8, Hazlet, NJ 07730-1247 T: (732) 264-9000, E: 

469benefits@teamsters469.org
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 97-50882

_____________________________________

FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,
VERSUS INCARNATE WORD HEALTH SERVICES INCORPORATED, doing business as Incarnate Word Health System Liability Protection Program, Individually; INCARNATE WORD HEALTH SYSTEM SELF-INSURANCE TRUST, Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(SA-96-CV-855)

______________________________________________________ September 8, 1998 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The j udgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for reasons assigned in its opinion of September 18, 1997.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSIGNMENT dated as of March 5, 2003 among VENTURES-NATIONAL
INCORPORATED, a Utah corporation with offices at 1855 Norman Avenue, Santa
Clara, California 95054-2029 (VNI); TITAN PCB EAST, INC., a Delaware corporation
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Purchaser with offices at 1855 Norman Avenue,
Santa Clara, California 95054-2029 (East, in this agreement VNI, East, and any
present or future affiliate or subsidiary of either will be collectively
referred to as (Titan)); and COESEN INC., a New Hampshire corporation with
offices at P.O. Box 275, Hudson NH 03051 (Coesen).

         WHEREAS, Coesen has previously granted a perpetual life time license to
build and sell HVR-Flex (the Technology) to Eastern Manufacturing Corporation, a
Massachusetts corporation (EMC) pursuant to a license agreement between EMC and
Coesen dated January 6, 1995 (the License Agreement);

         WHEREAS, on February 27, 2003, Titan purchased all of the assets of
EMC, including, without limitation, all of EMCs rights under the License
Agreement and, in connection with this purchase, East was assigned the rights
under the License Agreement;

         WHEREAS, Coesen now wishes to acknowledge and confirm the assignment of
the License Agreement to Titan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Coesen hereby consents to the assignment and transfer of EMCs rights under
   the License Agreement from EMC to East;

2. Coesen acknowledges and agrees that all the rights and obligations previously
   held by EMC under the License Agreement are now held by East, and Coesen will
   recognize these rights and obligations when performed or enforced by East;

3. Coesen acknowledges and agrees that whether the Technology is used by Titan,
   Coesen will regard any such use as a use by East pursuant to the License
   Agreement;

4. Titan shall pay Coesen a 2% royalty on a quarterly basis for all HVRFlex type
   product sold as consideration for the License Agreement.

5. Coesen will forgive the royalty for each quarter that both Alfred Covino and
   Joseph Thoman are under employment contracts with Titan/Ventures-National,
   Inc.

<PAGE>

VENTURES-NATIONAL INCORPORATED


By: /s/ David M. Marks                            By: /s/ Joseph Thoman
   -------------------------------                   -------------------------
Name: David Marks                                     Name: Joseph Thoman
Title: Chairman                                       Title: Vice President



                                        TITAN PCB EAST, INC.

                                        By:  /s/ David Marks
                                           -------------------------------------
                                             Name: David Marks
                                             Title: Chairman
Order entered June 8, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00493
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF J .R.W., ET AL., CHILD REN On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13
- 09740
- Y 

### O RDER This is an accelerated appeal from a decree terminating Father’s parental rights. On April 15, 2015, after perfecting appeal, Father’s trial counsel, who was appointed, filed in the trial court a motion to withdraw and substitute appellate couns el. By letter dated May 19, 2015, Deputy Dallas County District Clerk Angela C. Conejo informed this Court that no order had been entered by the trial court on trial counsel’s motion. By order entered May 22, 2015, w e abated this appeal to allow the tria l court an opportunity to conduct a hearing to determine if good cause existed to replace trial counsel with another attorney on appeal . Our order directed the trial court to make written findings of fact and sign an order either allowing trial counsel to withdraw and appointing appellate counsel or continuing trial counsel’s representation. Our order further directed court reporter Francheska Duffey to file a reporter’s record of the hearing and Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file a supple mental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings, any supporting documentation, and the trial court’s order

. On June 5,2015, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing an order allowing trial counsel to withdraw and appointing April Sm ith appellate counsel. Because the purpose of our abatement order

— to permit the trial court an opportunity to rule on trial counsel’s motion

— has been accomplished, we REINSTATE the appeal. We note our records already reflect the substitution of counsel . Pursuant to our May 22nd order, the reporter’s trial record remains due June 10, 2015.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Duffey.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022198
<NAME> COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,882,514
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     23,900
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         219,899
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        54,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 371,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,552,304
<COMMON>                                        41,026
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      571,826
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            108,727
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 721,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           864,498
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  99,217
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   71,640
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     31,283
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 5,686
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 733,401
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,552,304
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      265,007
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            17,987
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     199,590
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     217,577
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         47,430
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,036
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  48,466
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        19,142
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,324
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,493
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   27,831
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        19,671
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       13,846
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          11,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Trustees


Pebblebrook Hotel Trust


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-173468) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-163638 and 333-186324) of Pebblebrook Hotel Trust of our report dated February 26, 2014, with respect to the combined balance sheet of DP Fee Holding Co., LLC and DP Lease Holding, LLC as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related combined statements of members’ equity (deficit), operations and comprehensive income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the period July 29, 2011 to December 31, 2011, which report appears as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Pebblebrook Hotel Trust.





/s/ PKF O'Connor Davies


A Division of O’Connor Davies, LLP





New York, New York


February 26, 2014
Page 25.0

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Checklist Item #25

If the answer to item 24 is yes, does the application specify the effective date of the proposed 

partition and include a plan-year-by-plan-year projection of the amount of the reduction in 

benefit payments attributable to the partition?

See section 6.02.

Not applicable.
Exhibit 1: Page 1 of 2

WESTERN STATES OFFICE AND 

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND

THIRD SUSPENSION APPLICATION

Exhibit 1
TERRY A. GAINES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5159

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 21, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

Terry A. Gaines, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-3456

___________________________

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

William Carr

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa - Central 

____________

Submitted: October 18, 2021

Filed: November 30, 2021 

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM. 

William Carr received a 40-month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty to 

illegally possessing a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(3), 924(a)(2). Although he

challenges the sentence on both procedural and substantive grounds, we affirm. 
-2- 

We conclude that there was no procedural error, plain or otherwise. See 

United States v. Becerra, 958 F.3d 725, 731 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing a sentencing 

challenge raised for the first time on appeal for plain error). The district court1

considered each of the mitigating circumstances he presented, including his “mental 

and emotional health,” and simply decided that they did not justify a lower sentence. 

See id.; United States v. Kay, 717 F.3d 659, 663 (8th Cir. 2013). 

Moreover, the sentence itself was substantively reasonable. See United States 

v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing the substantive 

reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of discretion); see also United States v. 

Washington, 893 F.3d 1076, 1080–81 (8th Cir. 2018) (explaining that a sentence 

within the advisory range is presumptively reasonable). The district court 

sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, including Carr’s dangerous

behavior while trying to evade the police, and did not rely on an improper factor or 

commit a clear error of judgment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); United States v. Larison, 

432 F.3d 921, 923–24 (8th Cir. 2006). In the end, his argument really comes down 

to a disagreement with how the district court weighed various factors, which “alone 

does not justify reversal.” United States v. Townsend, 617 F.3d 991, 994 (8th Cir. 

2010); see also United States v. Nguyen, 829 F.3d 907, 925–26 (8th Cir. 2016) 

(acknowledging the “wide latitude” that district courts have to weigh the statutory 

sentencing factors).

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. 

______________________________

1

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Iowa.