alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8.1  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT  Wholly-owned subsidiaries:  ·IFM Company Ltd., incorporated in the Cayman Islands  ·Beijing Aifeite International Franchise Consultant Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·City Integrated Residential Services (China) Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong, S.A.R.  ·Shanghai Yaye Real Estate Brokerage Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·CIR Real Estate Consultant (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Genius Nation Investments Ltd., incorporated in the British Virgin Islands  ·Shanghai Ruifeng Real Estate Investments Consultant Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Beijing Anxinruide Real Estate Brokerage Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Shanghai Anshijie Real Estate Consultant Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Beijing Kaishengjinglue Guarantee Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Kaisheng Jinglue (Shanghai ) Investment Management Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Beijing IFM International Real Estate Brokerage Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Beijing IFM Investment Managements Limited, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Shanghai Ruifeng Investment Managements Limited, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Beijing Huachuang Xunjie Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Shenzhen Kaian Investments Guarantee Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Chengdu Yize Real Estate Brokerage Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Chengdu Yichuan Real Estate Brokerage Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Chengdu Yidao Real Estate Brokerage Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  Consolidated entities:  ·Business Vision Management Consultants Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong, S.A.R.  ·Beijing Kaicheng Huaxin Investment Consultants Limited, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Beijing Xinrui Shijiao Business Managements Consultant Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Tianjin Shiji TianRe Investment Management Company Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Beijing Huaxing Tianye Investment Management Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Beijing Rongzhong Xingye Investment Co., Ltd., incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China  ·Tianjin Shiji TianRe Equity Investment Fund Management Limited Partnership, incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China
#### FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF BREVARD COUNTY, Florida, and City of Melbourne, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellants, v. James P. MARIELLI, Appellee.

No. 2262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1970.

Rehearings Denied May 20, 1970.

John R. Beranek of Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellant First Federal.

Monroe E. McDonald of Sanders, Mc-Ewan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for appellant City.

Alan R. Schwartz, of Horton & Schwartz, Miami, and Law Offices of James H. Nance, Eau Gallie, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN, and REED, JJ., concur.
#### Rufus PETERSON et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Respondent.

Nos. FF-176—FF-206

(Consolidated).

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Selig I. Goldin of Goldin & Cates, Gaines-ville, for petitioners.

J. E. Hodges, Jacksonville, for respondent.

MELVIN, Judge.

Petitioners file their Petitions for Certio-rari, which we treat as Petitions for Review of Administrative Orders under the provisions of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, seeking reversal of petitioners’ reclassification appeals.

Upon review of the record, briefs, and oral argument, the Petitions for Review are denied and the Orders of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services entered in each of the above cases are

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
#### Howard R. H. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Paula B. JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 71-254.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 23, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Roger A. Barker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### John C. LONGMIRE, Petitioner, v. EASTERN ERECTORS, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 42803.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 21, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 196 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 196

  To prohibit the Central Intelligence Agency from using an unmanned 
  aerial vehicle to carry out a weapons strike or other deliberately 
lethal action and to transfer the authority to conduct such strikes or 
              lethal action to the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2021

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and in addition to the 
Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Central Intelligence Agency from using an unmanned 
  aerial vehicle to carry out a weapons strike or other deliberately 
lethal action and to transfer the authority to conduct such strikes or 
              lethal action to the Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OPERATION OF 
              UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE STRIKES AND TRANSFER OF AUTHORITY 
              TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
officer or employee of, or contractor or detailee to, the Central 
Intelligence Agency shall use an unmanned aerial vehicle to carry out a 
weapons strike or other lethal action.
    (b) Transfer to Department of Defense.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the President shall transfer to the Department of 
Defense all authority to use an unmanned aerial vehicle to carry out a 
weapons strike or other lethal action.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lionel FIELDS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 61793.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Lionel Fields applying for reconsideration. Orleans Parish.

Granted: this application is transferred to the district court, which will act on the allegation of ineffective counsel; the other allegations are without merit. Our previous ruling that the application was moot is set aside.
#### Roland B. OLIVER, Jr., Appellant, v. Doris A. OLIVER, Appellee.

No. R-495.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
SAVE MARTS SUPERMARKETS 

Page 37.1.830
Page 37.1.831
Page 37.1.832
Page 37.1.833

SFO SHUTTLE 

Page 37.1.835

Page 37.1.837

1 
Page 37.1.838

 

SHAMROCK MATERIALS INC 

Page 37.1.840
Page 37.1.841
Page 37.1.842
 

 

 

Page 37.1.843
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     3,052
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,052
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,716
<OTHER-SE>                                         336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #17 – 4.05(4) List of Contributing Employers and Employee Organizations 

Does the application include a list of each employer who has an obligation to contribute under 

the Plan and each employee organization representing participants under the Plan. 

See section 4.05(4). 

Document 17.1 provides the list of each employer that has an obligation to contribute under 

the Plan. Document 17.2 provides the list of employee organizations representing participants 

under the Plan. 
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #17 – 4.05(4) List of Contributing Employers and Employee Organizations 

17.1 

Document 17.1

List of Contributing Employers 

The following is the current list of employers that have an obligation to contribute to the Plan 

based on the current collective bargaining agreements with the Mechanics Motor City Lodge 

No. 698, District 60, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. 

Faygo Beverages, Inc. (Company #3003) 

3579 Gratiot 

Detroit, MI 48207 

George P. Johnson Company (Company #1150) 

3600 Giddings Rd. 

Auburn Hills, MI 48236 

Penske Truck Leasing Co. (Company #6050) 

P.O. Box 563 

Reading, PA 19603-1393 

USF Holland (Company #3900)

700 S. Waverly Rd. 

Holland, MI 49423 

YRC (Company #7800) 

10990 Roe Ave. 

Overland Park, KS 66211 
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #17 – 4.05(4) List of Contributing Employers and Employee Organizations 

17.2 

Document 17.2 

Employee Organization 

Mechanics Motor City Lodge No. 698, District 60, International Association of Machinists and 

Aerospace Workers is the only employee organization representing participants under the Plan.
Page 37.1.702
Page 37.1.703

PAR 3 MOTORS, INC DBA CONCORD MITSUBISHI-KIA 

Page 37.1.705
Page 37.1.706
Page 37.1.707
Page 37.1.708

 

PARKER-ROBB CHEVROLET 

Page 37.1.710
Page 37.1.711
Page 37.1.712
Page 37.1.713
 

 

Page 37.1.714

PEARSON AUTOMOBILE 

Page 37.1.716
Page 37.1.717
Page 37.1.718


PENINSULA FORD OF SUNNYVALE 

Page 37.1.721
Page 37.1.722
Page 37.1.723
Page 37.1.724
Page 37.1.725

 

PENSKE TRUCK LEASING (LOCAL 1101) 

Page 37.1.727

Page 37.1.729
Page 37.1.730
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 503-022]


Idaho Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

November 10, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47910), the Office of Hydropower Licensing 
(OHL) has reviewed as-built exhibits showing the constructed project 
transmission line. The as-built exhibits indicate the route of the 
constructed transmission line differs from the authorized transmission 
line route. Idaho Power Company requests Commission approval of the as-
built exhibits, including the constructed transmission line. The Swan 
Falls Project is located on the Snake River, in Ada and Owyhee 
Counties, Idaho.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be obtained 
by calling the Commission's Public Reference Room at (202) 208-1371. In 
the EA, staff concludes that approval of the constructed transmission 
line would not constitute a major Federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.

    For further information, please contact the project manager, Jon 
Confrancesco, at (202) 219-0079.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30073 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered January 29, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01339
- CR DAYLIN BRIGGS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judi cial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F19
- 75450
- R



### O RDER Appell a n t ’ s notice of appeal was timely filed on October 28, 2019. The clerk ’ s record, filed December 6, 2019, shows appellant requested the report er ’ s record on October 31 , 2019.
T he reporter ’ s rec ord was due December 7, 2019

. When in was not filed, we notified court reporter Georgina Ware by postcard dated December 11, 2019 and directed her to file by January 10, 2020 (1) the reporter ’ s re cord, (2) written verification th at no hearings were recorded, or (3) written verification appellant had not requested the report er ’ s record . To date, Ms. Ware h as not filed the reporter ’ s record, informed the Court no record was recorded, or otherwise communicated with the Court about t he record.
We ORDER the repor ter ’ s record filed by February 18, 2020

. We caution Ms. Ware that the failure to do so may result in the Court tak ing whatever remedies it has to ensure thisappeal proceeds in a timely fashion, including ordering she not sit u ntil the complete re porter ’ s

record is filed.
We DIRECT the C lerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Jennifer Bennett , Presiding Judge, 265 th Judicial District Court ; to Georgina Ware , offic ial court reporter, 265th Judicial District Court ; an d to counsel for all pa rties

.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Ronaldo Reyes            | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 1761 East St. Andrew Place           | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Santa Ana, CA  92705                 | Wilmington, DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Darnella Tinnel-Crawford       | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700               | 500 Woodward Ave |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | Mail code:  MI-01-20-TRES |
|                                            | Detroit, MI 48226 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-1 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q ofComputer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Dennis Conroy, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant toRule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

 

1.     thePeriodic Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 8, 2005 | /s/  Dennis Conroy |
|--------|------------------|-------------------------|
|   |             | DENNIS CONROY           |
|   |             | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.

 

----
Exhibit 11: Page 1 of 2

WESTERN STATES OFFICE AND 

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND

SECOND SUSPENSION APPLICATION

Exhibit 11
Pursuant to Section 6.06 of IRS Revenue Procedure 2016-27, the undersigned Trustees hereby cefiify

that if the Plan receives f¡nal authorizat¡on to implement the proposed suspension as described in Sect¡on43?"(eXgXHXvi) of the Codß ând chooses to ìmplement the aL.rthorìzed slrspens¡on, then, in addition to the

plan amendment implementing th6 suspensron, the following plan amendments will be timely ådoptedand not modifred at åny t¡me thereafter before the suspension of benefits expires:

(1) A plan amendment providing that in âccordance with section 432(€XgXCXii) of the Code the

benefit suspension will cease as of the first day of the first plan year following the plan year in

which the plan sponsor fails to mainta¡n a wr¡tten record of ¡ts cJetermination lhat both j

(a) All reasonable measures to avotd tnsolverìcy conünue to þe taken durtng tñê penod of the

þenefit suspens¡on.

(b) Tho plan is projected to Þecome insolventunless benefits continue to be suspended.

(2) A plan arnendment provid¡ng that any future bonefit ¡mprovements must satisfy the requ¡rements

of S 432(sXgXE) of the Code

Michael Parmelee, Co-Chåir Suzanne Mode, Co-thê¡r

Authorized Trustee on behãlf of the Board ol Authorized T¡ustee on bohalf af the Board eTTrusteBs for the Western Stâtes Office and Trustees for th€ Westem States Otfice and

Frofessionãl Employeês Pension Fund Professional Ëmployees Pension Fund

ûate Date

gli*itÞir ttr Pêg* ä $r a

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the 

Treasury
Pursuant to Section 6.06 of IRS Revenue Procedure 2016-27, the undersigned Trustees hereby certify

that if the Plan receives final authorization to implement the proposed suspension as described in Section432(eXgXHXvi) of the Code and chooses to implement the authorized suspension, then, in addition to the

plan amendment implementing the suspension, the following plan amendments will be timely adopted

and not modified at any time thereafter before the suspension of benefits expires:

(1) A plan amendment providing that in accordance with section 432(eXgXCX¡i) of the Code the

benefit suspension will cease as of the first day of the first plan year following the plan year in

which the plan sponsor fails to maintain a written record of its determination that both:

(a) All reasonable measures to avoid insolvency continue to be taken during the period of the

benefit suspension.

(b) The plan is projected to become insolvent unless benefits continue to be suspended.

(2) A plan amendment providing that any future benefit improvements must satisfy the requirements

of $ a32(e)(9)(E) of the Code.

Michael Parmelee, Co-Chair

Authorized Trustee on behalf of the Board ofTrustees for the Western States Otfice and

Professional Employees Pension Fund

Date

Trustees for the Western States Office and

Professional Employees Pension Fund

Exhibit 11: Page 2 of 2

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
#### TIRE CITY, a division of Southern Oil Stores, Inc., Appellant, v. James W. WRIGHT, Appellee-Cross Appellant.

No. K-139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 9, 1969.

George L. Hudspeth and Rutledge R. Liles, of Mahoney, Hadlow, Chambers & Adams, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Law Offices of S. Perry Penland, Jacksonville, for appellee-cross appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K, Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer
Horizons Corp. (the "COMPANY") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the
"PERIODIC REPORT"), I, William J. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


  Date: August 14, 2002                              /s/ William J. Murphy
        ---------------                              ---------------------
                                                     William J. Murphy
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

                                       25
#### Lee Marvin ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-838.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.