alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Operations and Retained
Deficit and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         3,571
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              32,752
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                32,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        103,121
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (110,369)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  32,752
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 49,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (7)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (49,017)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (49,017)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (49,017)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.01)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Flameret, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher Glover, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: June 2, 2011  /s/ Christopher GloverChristopher Glover
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40339

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUAL AUGUST,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CR-36-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1997

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manual August appeals his sentence, arguing that the

district court mistakenly concluded that he lacked the authority

to make a departure below the statutory minimum sentence for the

offense of conviction. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs of the parties and find no reversible error. 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(f)(4); U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1759 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1759

  To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2021

 Mr. McHenry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blue Ridge National Heritage Area 
Reauthorization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE BLUE RIDGE NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    The Blue Ridge National Heritage Area Act of 2003 (54 U.S.C. 320101 
note; Public Law 108-108; 117 Stat. 1274; 131 Stat. 461; 132 Stat. 661; 
133 Stat. 778) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (i)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        to carry out this section $1,000,000 for each fiscal year.''; 
        and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``subsection 
                (a)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)''; and
            (2) in subsection (j), by striking ``2021'' and inserting 
        ``2036''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1935 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1935

   To direct the Secretary of Defense to reassign 95 percent of the 
 members of the National Guard deployed to the National Capital Region 
    to the southern land border of the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2021

Mr. Murphy of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. Biggs) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Defense to reassign 95 percent of the 
 members of the National Guard deployed to the National Capital Region 
    to the southern land border of the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guard the Border Act''.

SEC. 2. REASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD DEPLOYED TO THE 
              NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 14 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall reassign 95 
percent of covered members to support U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection in--
            (1) securing the southern land border of the United States; 
        and
            (2) management and care for migrants at such border.
    (b) Study; Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
Congress a report containing the results of a study assessing the 
effects of the reassignment under subsection (a).
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``covered duty'' means duty performed--
                    (A) in the National Capital Region; and
                    (B) in support of the mission in response to the 
                attacks on January 6, 2021, on the Capitol Buildings 
                and the United States Capitol Grounds (described in 
                sections 5101 and 5102 of title 40, United States 
                Code).
            (2) The term ``covered member'' means a member of the 
        National Guard deployed to the National Capital Region--
                    (A) on or after January 6, 2021; and
                    (B) to perform covered duty.
            (3) The term ``National Capital Region'' has the meaning 
        given that term in section 2674 of title 10, United States 
        Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Accounting Officer of EnzymeBioSystems, a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K of the Company for the
fiscal period ended June 30, 2012 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-K”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of EnzymeBioSystems (the “Company”) certifies to his
knowledge that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                            
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                  





|                           |                             
|-------------------------- | ----------------------------
|/s/   Anushavan Yeranosyan |                             
|Anushavan Yeranosyan       |                             
|                           | Principal Accounting Officer
|                           |                             
|Date:  October 11, 2012    |                             
|                           |                             
|                           |
#### Joy C. HALL, Appellant, v. A. Parker HALL, Jr., Appellee.

No. 71-15.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# 2015 Income by Source
#### Deoties MILLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 15, 1969.

Deoties Miller, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

This court proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, *73818 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/10/2010 02:34 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |08/09/2010 04:19 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |guidance memo on residential/institutional/commercial emergency engine definition | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------|

Cortney, Attached is the draft memo per your request.(See attached file: Guidance on RICE NESHAP residential-institutionalcommercial emergency engine definition.doc) Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy J. McPike, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  November 9, 2004                         
|                                                 
|/s/    CINDY J. MCPIKE                           
|Cindy J. McPike                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated July 25, 1996, and published in the Federal 
Register on July 31, 1996, (61 FR 39986), Guilford Pharmaceuticals, 
Inc., Attn: Ross S. Laderman, 6611 Tributary Street, Baltimore, 
Maryland 21224, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of cocaine (9041), a 
basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. Sec. 823(a) and determined that the 
registration of Guilford Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to manufacture cocaine 
is consistent with the public interest at this time. Therefore, 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Sec. 823 and 28 CFR Secs. 0.100 and 0.104, the 
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby 
orders that the application submitted by the above firm for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled 
substance listed above is granted.

    Dated: January 9, 1997.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-3083 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### VALLEYBROOK DEVELOPERS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. GULF POWER COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 44429.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 281 So.2d 617.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEICLE, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 17, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 17, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0105. JOHN T. SMITH v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015RCCV00312
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 7, 2015

No. 04-15-00165-CR

Richard DEBENEDETTO,

Appellant

v.

The State of 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A1481

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State’s Motion for Extension of Time to File the Brief has been GRANTED. Time is 

extended to November 13, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Patrick Edwin O'Fiel

The Law Office of Patrick O'Fiel, P.C.

The Schreiner Building

200 Earl Garrett, Suite 206

Kerrville, TX 78028

Steven A. Wadsworth

Assistant District Attorney - 216th Judicial District

200 Earl Garrett St., Suite 202

Kerrville, TX 78028
Checklist Item #40 Application for Approval of a Suspension of 

Benefits Under MPRA

Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund EIN: 51-0161467

Plan No.: 001

Does the application 

include this checklist, 

completed and placed 

on top of the 

application. 

See section 7.10.

The completed checklist on behalf of the Iron Workers 

Local 17 Pension Fund is included at the beginning of 

the application packet. The Checklist is numbered as 

IW17PF_752–757. 

IW17PF_751
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______________

No. 16

- 3430

______________

NAVA LANIADO,

Appellant

v.

CERTIFIED CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU

______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.N.J. No. 3

- 14

- cv

- 02798)

Honorable Peter G. Sheridan, District Judge

______________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

Pursuant to 3 rd Cir. I.O.P. 5.4, counsel are to be listed on not precedential opinions

if the case was argued. The above captioned appeal was argued on May 11, 2017, but the

opinion which was filed on August 29 , 2017 omitted the listing of counsel. Accordingly,

it is here by ordered that an amended opinion will be issued listing counsel for the parties.

As this amendment is clerical in nature, the filing date of the opinion will not be changed.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date d : August 30, 2017

CJG/JK/cc: All Counsel of Record
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00470

- CR

David A. MEDRANO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR4205

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED September 9, 2015.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice