alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5                                                      
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000021828
<NAME>                                COLONIAL COMMERCIAL CORP.
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                     529,639
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            7,475,891
<ALLOWANCES>                               463,282
<INVENTORY>                              1,139,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        12,954,063
<PP&E>                                     563,175
<DEPRECIATION>                             211,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          13,958,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    4,184,118
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 83,184
<COMMON>                                    71,680
<OTHER-SE>                               8,810,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            13,958,954
<SALES>                                  5,082,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         5,082,652
<CGS>                                    3,647,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            3,647,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            70,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          57,944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,554)
<INCOME-TAX>                                39,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (47,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (47,554)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.03)
        


</TABLE>
#### Mary-Jo Keane, Respondent, v John M. Tomsky et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[736 NYS2d 221]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered on or about November 9, 2000, which denied defendants- appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as against them pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellants’ motion to dismiss was properly denied since the documentary evidence upon which the motion is premised does not establish, as a matter of law, that defendants, plaintiffs attorneys in the underlying action, did not commit actionable malpractice in connection with serving the defendants in that action (see, *Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. v Tim’s Amusements,*275 AD2d 24:3/246). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7106

JASON SOTIRIS KARAVIAS, II,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director; ROBIN HULBERT,

Ph.D.; WAYNE KINCAID; DAVE L. GRAHAM; RONDA

YATES; PSYCHOLOGIST WILLIAMS; SAMUEL L. BATTS;

JAMES E. SMITH; JAMES E. BRIGGS; E. C. MORRIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-10)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Sotiris Karavias, II, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;

John Britton Russell, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Karavias v. Angelone, No. CA-95-10 (E.D. Va. July 17, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of United States Brent Oil Fund, LP (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Nicholas D. GerberName:
Nicholas D. GerberTitle:
President and Chief Executive OfficerUnited States Commodity Funds LLC,General Partner of United States Brent Oil Fund, LP
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1840 

To amend the Small Business Act and the CARES Act to extend the covered 

period for the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS (for herself and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act and the CARES Act 

to extend the covered period for the paycheck protection 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COVERED PERIOD FOR PAY4 CHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(a)(36)(A)(iii) of the 

6 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(A)(iii)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 2021’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘June 30, 2021’’. 

9 (b) FUNDING.—Section 1102(b)(1) of the CARES 

10 Act (Public Law 116–136), as amended by section 323 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1840 IH

1 of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Non2 profits, and Venues Act (Public Law 116–260), is amend3 ed by striking ‘‘March 31, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 

4 2021’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7535

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

LONNELL DEANGELO MCRAE, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cr-00099-BO-1; 5:16-cv-00328-

BO) 

Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lonnell Deangelo McRae, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Lonnell Deangelo McRae seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McRae has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Cherry Cai, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Secure Luggage
      Solutions Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Secure Luggage Solutions Inc.                                                               

Dated: February 25, 2011

| | /s/Cherry Cai                             
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Cherry Cai                                
| | Chief Financial Officer                   
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
| | Accounting Officer)                       
| | Secure Luggage Solutions Inc.             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Secure Luggage
Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Secure Luggage Solutions Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
p. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 109)IV-C-7 5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:57

AM Sheet 109of 232P. 2



### £ JE L \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y

% PRO* * WASHINGTON , D.C . 2046 0 

### FE S 22 .

OFFICEO F AI RAN D RADIATIO N
Honorabl e Dant e B . Fascel l Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Fascell : Than k you for passin

g alon g the comment s o f you r constituent s concernin g EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refuelin

g emission control s an d proposed gasolin e volatilit y regulations . Be assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l be considered i n th e nex t phas e o f our rulemakin g process . W

e wil l als o b e placin g the m in the publi c docket s for th e rulemaking . Than k you agai n for you r concer n in thi s matter . Sincerel y

yours , Richar d D . Wilson Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : -Docke t A-87-1 1 Docke t A-85-2 1 Prepare d by : For

mLetter:sal:2/17/88:"AL880652 : ECTD - Ann Arbor , M I BCC : Regio n 0 4 Congressiona l Liaison/Quin n AO/Dereme r Docke t A-87-1 1 an

d Docke t A-85-2 1 c/ o Jacki e McManu s
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                         UT
<CIK>                                             0000022767
<NAME>                                            Texas-New Mexico Power Company

<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      921,094
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    214
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         16,824
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       27,437
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 966,255
<COMMON>                                       107
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      222,149
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            83,617
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 305,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,060
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           463,181
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 194,141
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  966,255
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      118,111
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           1,044
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     101,998
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     103,042
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        15,069
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             215
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 15,284
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       11,471
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,813
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    36
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  3,777
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      10,054
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (5,404)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130868 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROGER L. SCHIEFLER, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130868 

 COA: 262425 

Kent CC: 03-091982-NM 

WARNER, NORCROSS & JUDD, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the 

completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. 

l0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Healthcare inspection[electronic resource] : evaluation of community based outpatient clinics.**
 
SuDoc Number:VA 1.55/5:

Item Number:0983-A-19 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000873526
 
2009 | 2010 | 2011
 
March 3, 2020
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Asia Growth Private Equity 2, Limited. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1)
The Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 20, 2010





/s/ James HahnJames HahnChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Asia Growth Private Equity 2, Limited., and will be retained by Asia Growth Private Equity 2, Limited. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45862

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JOSEPH ALAN PETERSON ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: October 3, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Nancy A. Baskin , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and two

- year determinate sentence for injuring jails, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Joseph Alan Peterson was found guilty of injuring jails , Idaho Code §§ 18

- 7018, 19

-
2520F . The district court imposed a two

- year determinate sentence, to be served consecutively

with Peterson’s sentence in a se parate case

. Peterson appeals, contending that his sentence is

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are wel l established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed t he record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Peterson ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**** 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Titanium Healthcare, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014, (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Chuck Talley, Chief Financial Officer, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Titanium Healthcare, Inc. |

 

|                  |         |                    |        |
|-----------------------|--------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Dated: April 27, 2015 | By:          | */s/ Chuck Talley*      |   |
|                  | Name:        | Chuck Talley            |   |
|                  | Title:  | Chief Financial Officer |   |