alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Webinar Attendees: Negotiated Rulemaking for Distribution Transformers Medium-Voltage Working Group MeetingMeeting Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2011Name Title Organization Street CityStateZip Phone Fax EmailAllen, Ph.D., Jerry Transformer TechnologyLeaderMetglas, Inc. 440 Allied Drive Conway SC 29526 843-349-6810 843-349-6829 jerry.allen@metglas.comCostello, Pamela Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1801 K Street, Suite 500 Washington DC 20006-1301 202-973-2400202-481-7354202-973-2401 pamela.costello@navigantconsulting.comDrexler, P.E., Charles R VP of Operations /EngineeringKentucky Association of ElectricCooperatives4515 Bishop Lane Louisville KY 40218 502-451-2430 N/A charlied@uus.orgcdrexler@kaec.orgFlaten, David Senior SpecialtyEngineer)Xcel Energy 1123 West 3rd Ave Denver CO 80223 N/A N/A david.l.flaten@xcelenergy.comFreeman, Jeremiah Energy Analyst New West Technologies, LLC 1000 Independence Ave,SWWashington DC 20585 N/A N/A jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.govJohnson, Caitlin Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 South Bedford Street,Suite 400Burlington MA 01803 781-270-8398 781-270-0418 caitlin.johnson@navigant.comKaja, Brian Core and Coil DesignEngineerGE Energy DistributionTransformers7000 West Bert KounsIndustrial LoopShreveport LA 71129 N/A N/A brian.kaja@ge.comLass, James GM of DistributionEngineering andEmergency ManagementCleco Power LLC 2030 Donahue Ferry Rd Pineville LA 71361 N/A N/A James.Lass@cleco.comLau, Christopher Consultant Navigant Consulting 1801 K Street NWSuite 500Washington DC 20006-1301 202-481-7524 202-973-2401 christopher.lau@navigantconsulting.comLuo, Zhimei Consultant Navigant Consulting 1801 K Street, NW, Suite500Washington DC 20006 240-401-5410 202-973-2401 zhimei.luo@navigant.comLyke, Richard F. Principal Engineer,Product Development &Applications EngineeringAK Steel Corporation 705 Curtis Street Middletown OH 45043-0001 513-425-5709 513-425-5866 richard.lyke@aksteel.comPetrosino, Thomas Consultant Prolec GE / TRP Consulting 1917 Park Road Charlotte NC 28203 704-904-5509 N/A tpetrosino@carolina.rr.comRossetti, John Systems Engineer Memphis Light Gas and Water 220 South Main Memphis TN 38103 N/A N/A jrossetti@mlgw.orgSchneider, Jeff 3-Phase PadmountEngineering ManagerCooper Power Systems 1600 E. North Street Waukesha WI 53188 N/A N/A jeffrey.schneider@cooperindustries.comSmith, Robert Product Manager Federal Pacific 601 Old Airport Rd Bristol VA 24201 276-645-8836 N/A bsmith@federalpacific.com
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-037-08-1200-00-264a]


Public Land Closure To Use of Firearms

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 43 CFR 8364.1(a) and 8365.2-5(a), in order to 
protect persons, property and resources, notice is hereby given that 
the Pocatello Resource Area, Bureau of Land Management, prohibits the 
discharge or use of firearms, other weapons and fireworks within the 
Formation Cave/Springs Research Natural Area/Area of Critical 
Environmental Concern (RNA/ACEC), located within the following 
boundaries of public lands:

T. 08 S., R. 42 E., Boise Meridian, Caribou County,
    Sec. 28: E\1/2\SW\1/4\.

DATES: Effective immediately, this prohibition will remain in effect 
until revoked.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Steele, Pocatello Resource Area 
Manager, Bureau of Land Management, 1111 N. 8th St., Pocatello, Idaho, 
83201 (208) 236-6860.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This prohibition on the use of firearms, 
other weapons or fireworks within the Formation Cave/Springs RNA/ACEC 
will serve to protect the safety and health of individuals and groups 
visiting and hiking the network of trails located within the lands 
described above. Signs will be posted in strategic locations to provide 
notice of this restriction.

    Dated: November 13, 1997.
Jeff S. Steele,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-30581 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, James Nowodworski, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Respect Your Universe, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Respect Your Universe, Inc.




Dated:  April 29, 2014




/s/ James NowodworskiJames NowodworskiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting

Officer)















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Respect Your Universe, Inc. and will be retained by Respect Your Universe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Asia Growth Private Equity 1, Limited. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1)
The Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 20, 2010





/s/ James HahnJames HahnChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Asia Growth Private Equity 1, Limited., and will be retained by Asia Growth Private Equity 1, Limited. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-07507 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS Investments VIT Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 12/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

December 31, 2008

ANNUAL REPORT

**DWS INVESTMENTS VIT FUNDS**
#### Jim FAIR, individually and as Supervisor of Elections, Appellant, v. Bessie LO SCALZO, Connie Leto, Cynthia Daniels, Pat alias Margaret J. Fredrick and Dalia Gomez, Appellees.

No. 40643.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 20, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 34.1






ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH


SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES







REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder


Entergy Texas, Inc.


Beaumont, Texas





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Texas, Inc. (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Gulf States Reconstruction Funding I, LLC’s Senior Secured Transition Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), (1)(iii), (1)(iv), (2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(iii), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii), and (4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 for Entergy Gulf States Reconstruction Funding I, LLC’s Senior Secured Transition Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





New Orleans, Louisiana


March 29, 2011
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Henry P. FASS, Appellee.

No. 70-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 22, 1971.

*224David J. Williams, of Langston & Massey, Lakeland, for appellant.

Joe R. Young, Jr., of Bradley, Johnson, Nelson, Young & Horton, Lake Wales, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

In Insurance Company of North America, Inc. v. Strauss, Fla.App.1970, 231 So.2d 548, we reversed a summary judgment predicated on the finding that the limitation of one year in the statute regulating uninsured motorist coverage was inoperative. Here the *adjudication*of insolvency occurred more than a year after the accident, but the plaintiff alleged and proved by competent substantial evidence that the tort-feasor’s insurer was insolvent *as a matter of fact*less than a year after the accident. We hold, as dicta in Fredel v. Southern General Insurance Co., Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 451, suggest, that this question is open to proof. This is the reasonable interpretation of the language of the statute which provides that coverage is applicable “where the liability insurer of the tort-feasor *becomes insolvent*within one year after such an accident.” Fla.Stat. § *627.0851 (1969),*F.S.A. Obviously becoming insolvent precedes adjudication of insolvency. See Fla.Stat. c. 631 (1969), F.S.A. The tort-feasor’s insurer was found to be insolvent on testimony of the State’s examiner, and this evidence is sufficient to warrant a finding of insolvency as of the anniversary of the accident although an adjuster testified that the company paid several small claims and his fees for several months thereafter.

Appellant next claims that the plaintiff, in an action against his own carrier predicated on uninsured motorist coverage, must prove that he was not guilty of contributory negligence. Its theory is that the action is contractual and the rule governing tort actions does not apply. We disagree. The action differs from that which he would normally prosecute against the tort-feasor in that he must first prove the contract and then his tort claim, which becomes an element of his contractual right. The proof of that tort claim against the uninsured motorist proceeds with the same burdens of proof as if it were filed as an action in tort. If appellant’s point were well taken the plaintiff would have to negate all potential affirmative defenses, which would make a cumbersome proceeding out of a simple one. See Fla.R.C.P. 1.-110(d), 30 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-24-00065-CR

RYAN PATRICK JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09F0319-102

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After a jury found Ryan Patrick Johnson guilty of murder, he was sentenced to ninetynine years’ confinement in prison. On December 27, 2023, Johnson filed a motion in the trial 

court seeking entry of a nunc pro tunc judgment. On February 14, 2024, the trial court entered 

an order denying Johnson’s motion. Johnson appealed the trial court’s order. 

In Texas, a party may only appeal when the Texas Legislature has authorized an appeal. 

Galitz v. State, 617 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). When the Legislature passes 

legislation granting a right of appeal, in addition to granting its citizens that substantive right, it 

also grants the appellate courts of this State jurisdiction to hear such appeals. In the absence of 

such authorizing legislation, appellate courts are without jurisdiction and have no authority to 

act. In the criminal context, the Texas Legislature has authorized appeals from written 

judgments of conviction and a few orders deemed appealable. See Gutierrez v. State, 307 

S.W.3d 318, 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The trial court’s February 14 order denying Johnson’s

motion for a nunc pro tunc judgment is not an order from which the Texas Legislature has 

authorized an appeal. In the absence of such an authorization, we are without jurisdiction to hear 

the appeal.

By letter dated May 8, 2024, we informed Johnson of this jurisdictional issue. Johnson 

did not respond to our letter. 
3

Because the trial court’s February 14 order denying Johnson’s motion for a nunc pro tunc 

judgment is not an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Consequently, we 

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Charles van Cleef

Justice

Date Submitted: June 11, 2024

Date Decided: June 12, 2024

Do Not Publish
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3306SI

_____________

Herbert E. Bundy, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

Park Place; Mary Laughlin; Madeline * District of Iowa.

Clark; Eilen Liddell; William E. *

Wilkins, Sued as William Wilkins; * [UNPUBLISHED]

City of Des Moines, IA; Floyd Jones; *

Des Moines Human Rights Commission, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: May 7, 1998

Filed: May 12, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Herbert E. Bundy appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit

against Park Place and others. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we

conclude an opinion would have no precedential value. We thus affirm the district

court's dismissal without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

We deny Bundy's motion on appeal for judgment against Madeline Clark.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of income and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000021212
<NAME> COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,975
<SECURITIES>                                    32,787
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,163
<INVENTORY>                                    107,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,907
<PP&E>                                         115,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,366
<BONDS>                                          8,966
<COMMON>                                        56,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,584
<SALES>                                        414,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               414,224
<CGS>                                          357,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  391,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,751)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   381
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,601
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,886
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30423]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 24, 1997.
    Time: 2 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Donna Ricketts, Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-3936.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 25, 1997.
    Time: 2 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Donna Ricketts, Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-3936.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 2, 1997.
    Time: 2 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Donna Ricketts, Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-3936.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 4, 1997.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Donna Ricketts, Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-3936.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93,242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: November 13, 1997.
Laverne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-30423 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Jeanette GOLDMANN and John Goldmann, Appellants, v. GEISKOPF BACKHOE SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-416.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
January 18, 2018

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALBERTO J. CELARIE, Appellant

NO. 14-17-00789-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/27/2015 3:35:56 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS 

PENSION FUND 

SUSPENSION APPLICATION 

Exhibit 17 

Rehabilitation Plan 

File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0001
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0002
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0003
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0004
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0005
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0006
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0007
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0008
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0009
File 17 Ex 17 Rehabilitation Plan 0010
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Asia Private Equity SPAC 3, Limited. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1)
The Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 16, 2010





/s/ James HahnJames HahnChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Asia Private Equity SPAC 3, Limited., and will be retained by Asia Private Equity SPAC 3, Limited. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.