63180 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices

c. The management structure for

operating the pilot program. Identify the

management, staff and directors who

will be assigned to oversee and operate

the pilot and discuss their expertise.

Their resumes should be included with

the Proposal. Discuss what additional

personnel will need to be hired.

d. A listing, description, and

examples of management reports

necessary to adequately monitor

ongoing pilot activities.

5. Measurement of Pilot Success: A

discussion of criteria the Bank intends

to utilize to measure the success of the

program, such as:

a. When the Bank anticipates

reviewing the program and making a

decision on whether to seek permanent

or other status for the pilot.

b. The existence of a sunset provision.

c. The factors or conditions that might

trigger a decision to terminate the pilot.

[FR Doc. 97–30964 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6725–01–P

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

The Commission hereby gives notice

of the filing of the following

agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of

1984.

Interested parties can review or obtain

copies of agreements at the Washington,

DC offices of the Commission, 800

North Capitol Street, N.W., Room 692.

Interested parties may submit comments

on an agreement to the Secretary,

Federal Maritime Commission,

Washington, DC 20573, by December 8,

1997.

Agreement No.: 202–008900–063.

Title: The ‘‘8900’’ Lines Agreement.

Parties:

The National Shipping Company of

Saudi Arabia

United Arab Shipping Company

(S.A.G.)

DSR-Senator Lines

A.P. Moller-Maersk Line

Sea-Land Service, Inc.

P&O Nedlloyd Limited

Synopsis: The proposed modification

to Article 14 of the Agreement

authorizes any party or any group of

parties to enter into individual service

contracts and deletes the current

prohibition on such contracts. The

modification also expands and clarifies

current guidelines applicable to service

contracts.

Agreement No.: 217–011595.

Title: TBS/Oceanica Space Charter

Agreement.

Parties:

TBS North America Liner, Ltda.

(‘‘TBS’’)

Comercial Maritima Oceanica Ltd.

(‘‘Oceanica’’)

Synopsis: The proposed Agreement

authorizes Oceanica to charter space to

TBS on a maximum of six vessels it will

operate from United States ports, and

U.S. inland and coastal points served

via such ports, to ports and points in

Central America, South America and the

Caribbean Sea. It also authorizes the

parties to agree on transshipment

arrangements and to cooperate with

respect to terminals and equipment.

Dated: November 20, 1997.

By Order of the Federal Maritime

Commission.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–30978 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 97–22]

Bermuda Container Line Ltd. v. SHG

International Sales Inc. FX Coughlin

Co., and Clark Building Systems, Inc.,

Notice of Filing of Complaint and

Assignment

Notice is given that a complaint filed

by Bermuda Container Line, Ltd.,

(‘‘Complainant’’) against Respondents

SHG International Sales Inc. (‘‘SHG’’),

FX Coughlin Co. (‘‘Coughlin’’), and

Clark Building Systems, Inc. (‘‘Clark’’)

was served November 20, 1997.

Complainant alleges that (1) Respondent

SHG violated sections 8 and 23 or,

alternatively, section 19, and section

10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act of 1984

(‘‘the Act’’), 46 U.S.C. app. §§ 1707 and

1721 or 1718, and 1709(a)(1), by failing

to file a non-vessel operating common

carrier (‘‘NVO’’) tariff or bond or

performing freight forwarding services

without a forwarder license, and by

concealing the identity of the shipper

with respect to a shipment from Clark,

PA to Bermuda, entering into a credit

agreement with no intention of paying

the freight and misrepresenting itself as

the shipper; (2) Respondent Coughlin

violated section 19 of the Act and 46

CFR §§ 510.21(c), (e) and (f), by falsely

certifying it had processed the

shipment’s Bill of Lading (‘‘BL’’) when

it knew or should have known that the

BLs designated shipper (SHG) could not

be a shipper, seeking a commission from

Complainant by misrepresentation and

permitting SHG to use Coughlin’s

forwarding license; and (3) Respondent

Clark violated section 10(a)(1) of the Act

by delivering cargo to Complainant

when it knew or should have known

that SHG had no tariff or NVO bond on

file with the Commission and failing to

inform Complainant of the facts or to

pay the shipment’s freight.

This proceeding has been assigned to

the office of Administrative Law Judges.

Hearing in this matter, if any is held,

shall commence within the time

limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,

and only after consideration has been

given by the parties and the presiding

officer to the use of alternative forms of

dispute resolution. The hearing shall

include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the

presiding officer only upon proper

showing that there are genuine issues of

material fact that cannot be resolved on

the basis of sworn statements, affidavits,

depositions, or other documents or that

the nature of the matter in issue is such

that an oral hearing and crossexamination are necessary for the

development of an adequate record.

Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR

502.61, the initial decision of the

presiding officer in this proceeding shall

be issued by November 20, 1998, and

the final decision of the Commission

shall be issued by March 22, 1999.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–31032 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices;

Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or

Bank Holding Companies

The notificants listed below have

applied under the Change in Bank

Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and §

225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12

CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank

holding company. The factors that are

considered in acting on the notices are

set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12

U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for

immediate inspection at the Federal

Reserve Bank indicated. The notices

also will be available for inspection at

the offices of the Board of Governors.

Interested persons may express their

views in writing to the Reserve Bank

indicated for that notice or to the offices

of the Board of Governors. Comments

must be received not later than

December 10, 1997.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas

City (D. Michael Manies, Assistant Vice

President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas

City, Missouri 64198-0001:

1. Wallace Company, Limited

Partnership, Cheyenne, Wyoming; to
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Notices 63181

acquire voting shares of Farmers State

Bankshares, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming,

and thereby indirectly acquire Wyoming

Bank & Trust, Cheyenne, Wyoming.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, November 20, 1997.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 97–30967 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve

System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday,

December 1, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal

Reserve Board Building, 20th and C

Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Personnel actions (appointments,

promotions, assignments,

reassignments, and salary actions)

involving individual Federal Reserve

System employees.

2. Any items carried forward from a

previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the Board;

202–452–3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may

call 202–452–3206 beginning at

approximately 5 p.m. two business days

before the meeting for a recorded

announcement of bank and bank

holding company applications

scheduled for the meeting; or you may

contact the Board’s Web site at http://

www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic

announcement that not only lists

applications, but also indicates

procedural and other information about

the meeting.

Dated: November 21, 1997.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 97–31151 Filed 11–21–97; 4:09 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P

GENERAL SERVICES

ADMINISTRATION

Performance Review Board;

Membership; Senior Executive Service

AGENCY: General Services

Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the

names of the members of the

Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gail T. Lovelace, Director of Human

Resources, General Services

Administration, 1800 F Street, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501–0398.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

4313(c) (1) through (5) of Title 5 U.S.C.

requires each agency to establish in

accordance with regulations prescribed

by the Office of Personnel Management,

one or more Performance Review

Board(s). The Board(s) shall review the

performance rating of each senior

executive’s performance by the

supervisor, along with any

recommendation to the appointing

authority relative to the performance of

the senior executive.

Members of the Review Board are:

1. Thurman M. Davis, Sr.

(Chairperson), Deputy Administrator.

2. Martha N. Johnson, Chief of Staff.

3. Dennis J. Fisher, Commissioner,

Federal Technology Service.

4. Robert A. Peck, Commissioner,

Public Buildings Service.

5. Frank P. Pugliese, Commissioner,

Federal Supply Service.

6. G. Martin Wagner, Associate

Administrator for Governmentwide

Policy.

Dated: November 20, 1997.

Gail T. Lovelace,

Director of Human Resources.

[FR Doc. 97–31038 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–BR–M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 97N–0472]

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is announcing an

opportunity for public comment on the

proposed collection of certain

information by the agency. Under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the

PRA), Federal agencies are required to

publish notice in the Federal Register

concerning each proposed collection of

information, including each

reinstatement of an existing collection

of information, and to allow 60 days for

public comment in response to the

notice. This notice solicits comments on

requirements for filing a petition for

administrative stay of action.

DATES: Submit written comments on the

collection of information by January 26,

1998.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments

on the collection of information to the

Dockets Management Branch (HFA–

305), Food and Drug Administration,

12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1–23,

Rockville, MD 20857. All comments

should be identified with the docket

number found in brackets in the

heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of

Information Resources Management

(HFA–250), Food and Drug

Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm.

16B–19, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–

4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the

PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal

agencies must obtain approval from the

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for each collection of

information they conduct or sponsor.

‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined

in 44 U.S.C. 3502 (3) and 5 CFR 1320.3

(c) and includes agency requests or

requirements that members of the public

submit reports, keep records, or provide

information to a third party. Section

3506 (c) (2) (A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.

3506 (c) (2) (A)) requires Federal

agencies to provide a 60-day notice in

the Federal Register concerning each

proposed collection of information,

including each proposed reinstatement

of an existing collection of information,

before submitting the collection to OMB

for approval. To comply with this

requirement, FDA is publishing notice

of the proposed collection of

information listed below.

With respect to the following

collection of information, FDA invites

comments on: (1) Whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of FDA’s

functions, including whether the

information will have practical utility;

(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the

burden of the proposed collection of

information, including the validity of

the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,

and clarity of the information to be

collected; and (4) ways to minimize the

burden of the collection of information

on respondents, including through the

use of automated collection techniques,

when appropriate, and other forms of

information technology.