alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61011-61012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29956]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

29 CFR Part 2200


Rules of Procedure for E-Z Trials

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document restores the selection provision for commencing 
E-Z Trial, 29 CFR 2200.203(a), which was inadvertently removed.

DATES: November 14, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Earl R. Ohman, Jr., General Counsel, (202) 606-5410, Occupational 
Safety and Health Review Commission, 1120 20th Street NW., 9th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20036-3419.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 30, 1997, (62 FR 58650), 
paragraph (a) of Sec. 2200.203 was inadvertently removed. In order for 
the Rules of Procedures for E-Z trial to operate effectively, paragraph 
(a) must be restored.

List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2200

    Administrative practice and procedure, Hearing and appeal 
procedures.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Occupational Safety 
and Health Review Commission amends Title 29, Chapter XX, Part 2200, 
Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 2200--RULES OF PROCEDURE

    1. The authority citation continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 29 U.S.C. 661(g).

    2. Section 2200.203 is amended by adding paragraph (a), to read as 
follow:

[[Page 61012]]

Sec. 2200.203  Commencing E-Z Trial.

    (a) Selection. Upon receipt of a Notice of Contest, the Chief 
Administrative Law Judge may, at his or her discretion, assign an 
appropriate case for E-Z Trial.
* * * * *
    Dated: November 7, 1997.
Earl R. Ohman, Jr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-29956 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7600-01-M
null

2015-06-03

114.31025

eng - Argued: 2015-06-03. Docket number: 2015-1026
No. 00-7135.

#### Kennedy *v.*Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Robert Byron LANDRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin, ERG

DATE: September 30, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate 

Receiving Water Model [DCN SE04590]

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National 

Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model, developed as part of the Environmental 

Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power 

Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA-821-R-15-006 (DCN 

SE04527). The supporting documentation for this model includes the files listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment 

ID Document Name Brief Description

A1

Attachment 1: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Wildlife and Human Health 

Module - Comparison Database for EJ 

Cohorts - Option A (CCR) - DCN 

SE04590A1

CBI_Database used to compare the human health 

module results between baseline and Option A 

specifically for the cohorts used in the 

Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race 

population cohorts). Generates inputs for the 

Environmental Justice calculation databases. This 

version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A2

Attachment 2: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Wildlife and Human Health 

Module - Comparison Database for EJ 

Cohorts - Option B (CCR) - DCN 

SE04590A2

CBI_Database used to compare the human health 

module results between baseline and Option B 

specifically for the cohorts used in the 

Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race 

population cohorts). Generates inputs for the 

Environmental Justice calculation databases. This 

version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A3

Attachment 3: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Wildlife and Human Health 

Module - Comparison Database for EJ 

Cohorts - Option C (CCR) - DCN 

SE04590A3

CBI_Database used to compare the human health 

module results between baseline and Option C 

specifically for the cohorts used in the 

Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race 

population cohorts). Generates inputs for the 

Environmental Justice calculation databases. This 

version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A4

Attachment 4: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Wildlife and Human Health 

Module - Comparison Database for EJ 

Cohorts - Option D (CCR) - DCN 

SE04590A4

CBI_Database used to compare the human health 

module results between baseline and Option D 

specifically for the cohorts used in the 

Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race 

population cohorts). Generates inputs for the 

Environmental Justice calculation databases. This 

version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.
A5

Attachment 5: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Wildlife and Human Health 

Module - Comparison Database for EJ 

Cohorts - Option E (CCR) - DCN 

SE04590A5

CBI_Database used to compare the human health 

module results between baseline and Option E 

specifically for the cohorts used in the 

Environmental Justice analysis (i.e., race 

population cohorts). Generates inputs for the 

Environmental Justice calculation databases. This 

version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Sandra Price :

:

v. : No. 1873 C.D. 2016

:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :

Department of Transportation, :

Bureau of Driver Licensing, :

Appellant :

O R D E R

NOW, November 21, 2017

, having considered appell ee ’s application for

reargument, the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
Order filed March 13, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-01071-CV

____________

LINDA LEE BRUEGGEBORS, Appellant

V.

RICHARD PAUL BRUEGGEBORS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1983-28363

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 27, 2011. Appellant filed her

notice of appeal on December 8, 2011. Appellant also filed an affidavit of inability to pay 

costs in this court on January 13, 2012. On February 14, 2012, in accordance with Tex. R. 

App. P. 20.1(d)(2), the trial court clerk and the court reporter were notified that appellant 

filed an affidavit of indigence in this court and a contest was due in this court on or before

February 29, 2012. As of this date, no contest has been filed in this court. Appellant is 

therefore deemed indigent for purposes of appeal and the record will be provided without 
2

prepayment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f). Accordingly, we issue the following 

order.

The Harris County District Clerk is ordered to file a complete clerk's record in this 

appeal on or before April 12, 2012. The court reporter, Benjamin Alva, is ordered to file 

a complete reporter's record in this appeal on or before April 12, 2012. If no record was 

taken during the underlying proceedings, the court reporter shall so advise this court within 

10 days from the date hereof. Appellant's brief will be due 30 days after the complete 

record has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of R & A Productions, Inc.;for the Year ended September 30, 2010, I, Hector Medina, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Hector MedinaHector MedinaPrincipal Financial OfficerDecember 10, 2010
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Asia Private Equity SPAC 1, Limited. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1)
The Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 16, 2010





/s/ James HahnJames HahnChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Asia Private Equity SPAC 1, Limited., and will be retained by Asia Private Equity SPAC 1, Limited. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Williams, Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 633]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered February 27, 1998, convicting him of murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree, *571criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts), and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentences imposed on the convictions of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), and attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts); as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Hunt, 177*AD2d 649). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

However, the County Court erroneously sentenced the defendant as a persistent violent felony offender. Penal Law § 70.02 (1) (d) classifies attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as a violent felony when that crime is a lesser-included offense of another crime charged *(see, People v Dickerson,*85 NY2d 870). In 1992 the defendant pleaded guilty to the only charge of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and, therefore, the conviction did not qualify as a violent felony. Accordingly, the defendant’s sentences on his convictions of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and two counts of attempted robbery in the first degree, must be vacated and the matter remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for resentencing as to those counts.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Prudenti, JJ., concur.
# Consumer Protection and 

# the Travel Agency Industry: A View from the Front Lines Presentation Before the Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection Eben Peck, Vice President, Government Affairs, ASTA June 28, 2012

# About ASTA

• 8,000 domestic members • 900 international members in 170 countries 

## • Members include:

– Traditional/brick and mortar travel agents



### – Travel management companies

– Online travel agencies (Travelocity, Orbitz, etc.)



### – “Allied” members

# About the Industry

• Travel agents sell the majority of air travel, 2/3 of cruises and tours
• $136 billion/144 million trips sold in 2011
• $95 billion sold by “traditional” travel agents

– Air: $60 billion (45 percent of the market)

– Cruise: $9.6 billion (68 percent)

– Tours: $7.8 billion (67 percent) • Three percent growth forecast for 2012
• 83,000+ jobs / $5.6 billion in payroll / 98% of businesses SBA - eligible
• “Value Proposition” – Why do consumers use travel agents?

# ASTA and Consumer Protection

• “Front lines” of consumer travel issues • Long record of working with USDOT on consumer 

### protection issues, including:

– Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections #1, 2 and 3

– Oversales and Denied Boarding Docket

– Antitrust Issues

– ASTA staff sat on DOT’s tarmac delay task force (2008)

# ASTA and Airline Ancillary Fees

• Top consumer protection priority • ASTA members encounter ancillary fee frustration 

### when dealing with:

– Leisure Travelers/Families

– Business Travelers

– Small Businesses 

### • Travel agents and their customers cannot effectively comparison - shop under current system

# Ancillary Fees (Cont.)

• Example – A couple flying round trip from DCA to Fort Lauderdale with one checked and one carry - on bag each and want to make sure they can sit next to each other. Their search results today:

# Ancillary Fees (Cont.)

• Same example, if the couple had true ancillary fee transparency and could see and purchase ancillaries at the point of sale. Under this scenario, the couple would have chosen option #3 and ultimately saved $209.96.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7139** 

NATHANIEL SINGLETON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON; FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR; FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE; FOOD SERVICE MS. JOHNSON; FOOD SERVICE MS. VENTON; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE BROWN; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE ARGLINE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv
- 02985

- RBH )

Submitted : December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Nathaniel Singleton , Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court

. Singleton v. Nelson , No. 1:12

- cv
- 02985

- RBH (D.S.C. July
24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AF FIRMED
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2
                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, Cletus C. Glasener,  Vice  President-Finance  and Chief Financial  Officer of
Collins Industries,  Inc., certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the  quarterly  period
ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 29, 2005

                                       By:  /s/ Cletus C. Glasener
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Cletus C. Glasener, Vice President of
                                       Finance and Chief Financial Officer

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Collins Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Collins Industries,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.]
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
MICHAEL J. SHEA, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of COMPUTER HORIZONS CORP.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date:                                   |  | December 30, 2003
|--------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|                                        |  |                  
|/s/ Michael J. Shea                    
|                                       
|MICHAEL J. SHEA
Chief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Richard J. Thompson
|Richard J. Thompson    
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 5, 2005            



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Cahaba Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Kenneth Spiegeland, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:  February
      14, 2011
              
              
              /s/ Kenneth
      SpiegelandKenneth
      SpiegelandChief
      Executive Officer
                    and
      Chief Financial Officer
MALCOLM TROY MCGHEE, 

JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-6171

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 4, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

Jason Cromey, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justin D. Chapman, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30098]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control Meeting: 
Change of Time and Location

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 62 FR 54639--
dated October 21, 1997.

SUMMARY: Notice is given that the meeting time and location of the 
Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control (ACIPC) has 
changed. The meeting date, status, purpose, and matters to be discussed 
announced in the original notice remain unchanged. There will be no 
change in the meeting location of the Science and Program Review Work 
Group, which will be meeting prior to the full Committee from 1-1:45 
p.m. at the Sheraton Washington Hotel.
    Original Time and Location: 1-4:30 p.m., Sheraton Washington Hotel, 
2660 Woodley Road at Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20008.
    New Time and Location: 2-4:30 p.m., Omni Shoreham Hotel, 2500 
Calvert Street, NW, Washington, DC 20008.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas E. Blakeney, Executive 
Secretary, ACIPC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 
CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, M/S K61, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, 
telephone 770/488-1481.

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
John C. Burckhardt,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-30098 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M