alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         242,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,776,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 37,844,018
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,410,761
<PP&E>                                      42,553,931
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,010,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,199,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,035,787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       746,541
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,364,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,199,747
<SALES>                                    101,227,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,227,399
<CGS>                                       87,482,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               97,649,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (93,906)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             832,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,839,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                   932,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,907,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,907,835
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
#### Charlie SIAS, Jr. v. GULF TUNG CORP., Rafe Silverstein, Jr. and Associated Pipeline Contractors, Inc.

No. 62336.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1978.

In re: Associated Pipeline Contractors, Inc. and The Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of St. Tammany.

Writ denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1606 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1606

  To amend the Child Abuse and Prevention Act to require a study and 
                   report on marital age of consent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2021

   Mr. Taylor (for himself, Mr. Morelle, and Ms. Moore of Wisconsin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Child Abuse and Prevention Act to require a study and 
                   report on marital age of consent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Forced Child Marriages Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT ON MARITAL AGE OF CONSENT.

    Section 110 of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 
U.S.C. 5106f) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Study and Report on Marital Age of Consent.--
            ``(1) Study.--The Secretary shall study, with respect to 
        each State--
                    ``(A) the State law regarding the minimum marriage 
                age; and
                    ``(B) the prevalence of marriage involving a child 
                who is under the age of such minimum marriage age.
            ``(2) Factors.--The study required under paragraph (1) 
        shall include an examination of--
                    ``(A) the extent to which any statutory exceptions 
                to the minimum marriage age in such laws contribute to 
                the prevalence of marriage involving a child described 
                in paragraph (1)(B);
                    ``(B) whether such exceptions allow such a child to 
                be married without the consent of such child; and
                    ``(C) the impact of such exceptions on the safety 
                of such children.
            ``(3) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the 
        Senate and the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of 
        Representatives a report containing the findings of the study 
        required by this subsection, including any best practices.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                        37
<INVENTORY>                                      1,593
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,791
<PP&E>                                           1,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,912
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,093
<OTHER-SE>                                       (950)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,798
<SALES>                                            857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,084
<CGS>                                              608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    111
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 62732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 94-AWP-2]


Proposed Relocation of the Kahului (OGG) VORTAC and Realignment 
of VOR Federal Airways; Hawaii

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
published in the Federal Register on March 18, 1994. The NPRM proposed 
to relocate the Kahului Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range/
Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) and realign seven Federal airways. The 
FAA has determined that withdrawal of the proposal is warranted due to 
an in-flight aeronautical evaluation (flight check) that revealed the 
airways would not meet FAA designed criteria.

DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn as of November 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William C. Nelson, Airspace and Rules Division, (ATA-400), Office of 
Air Traffic Airspace Management, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 18, 1994, an NPRM was published in 
the Federal Register to amend 14 CFR part 71 to relocate the Kahului 
VORTAC and realign seven Federal airways that would be affected by this 
Kahului VORTAC relocation. No comments were received on the proposal.
    The FAA has decided to withdraw the proposal at this time due to 
flight check results.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Notice of proposed 
rulemaking, Airspace Docket No. 94-AWP-2, as published in the Federal 
Register on March 18, 1994 (59 FR 12875), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 13, 1997.
Nancy B. Kalinowski,
Acting Program Director for Air Traffic Airspace Management.
[FR Doc. 97-30773 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas-New Mexico Power Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott Forbes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Scott Forbes       
|Scott Forbes           
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 3, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0549

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ALEXANDER MADDEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until February 10, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 4 2021

01/04/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0549
Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003
accompanying this certification and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey F. Feidelberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
    in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 13, 2003            /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                 ----------------------------
                                     Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2



Rule 13a  14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, Ernest J. Verrico, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                           
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  | /s/ Ernest J. Verrico                     
|                   |  | Ernest J. Verrico                         
|                   |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

****The Board of Directors

Madison Square Garden, Inc.: 

****We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-164597) on Form S-8 of Madison Square Garden, Inc. of our report dated March 4, 2011, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of Madison Square Garden, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, equity and comprehensive income (loss) for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Square Garden, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

New York, New York 

March 4, 2011
Exhibit 13.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.




I, Jesús Maria Zabalza Lotina, Chief Executive Officer of Banco Santander (Brasil), S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Banco Santander (Brasil), S.A.




Date: June 18, 2014




By:
/s/ Jesús Maria Zabalza LotinaName:
Jesús Maria Zabalza LotinaTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      45,246,954
<SECURITIES>                                32,720,013
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,675,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                   680,158
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            94,322,745
<PP&E>                                      27,894,004
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,746,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             186,096,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,995,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       251,706
<OTHER-SE>                                 169,534,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               186,096,836
<SALES>                                     42,351,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,351,732
<CGS>                                        4,025,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,025,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            81,861,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,312,431
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             348,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (39,014,435)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (39,014,435)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (39,014,435)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.67)



</TABLE>
AGENDA 

February 11, 2015 

USEPA R5/Veolia/(IEPA) 

1. Carbon Injection on Units #2/3 

-Confirm fundamental agreement of all parties (USEPA, IEPA, Veolia) 

-Confirm there will be no effect upon current testing schedule 

-Determine permitting responsibilities of all parties(USEPA, IEPA, Veolia) 

-Establish draft timetable 

-IEPA available to conference (between 10:30 a.m. to 12:00, will break from 

FAP discussion to conference) 

2. Enhanced FAP 

-Veolia to summarize current enhanced activities in place 

-Veolia to summarize how current enhanced practices are consistent with 

draft T5 and areas that are not consistent 

*Conceptual discussion with entire group to ensure understanding. Details 

to be discussed in afternoon meeting of technical personal from R5 and 

Veolia. 

3. Ambient Air Monitor 

-USEPA to summarize details of project 

-Goals of project 

-Duration of project 

-Monitor location 

-Constituents monitored 

-Compliance understanding 

-Project manager/reporting 

-Administrative documentation details 

*USEPA, Region 5 Ambient Air experts to join meeting during discussion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                       452
<INVENTORY>                                      4,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,486
<PP&E>                                           5,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                     502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,442
<BONDS>                                         19,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,900
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,235
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,987
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    675
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       410
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0499 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-061-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 430 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 5 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: This AD’s actions are intended to prevent failure of a control tube bonded clevis, which 

could lead to failure of the control tube and subsequent loss of helicopter control.

Costs:

We estimate that labor costs average $85 a work hour. Based on this estimate, we expect the 

following costs:

 The cost of inspecting the control tube is minimal.

 Repairing the control tube requires 2 work-hours for a labor cost of $170.

 Replacing control tube, P/N 430-001-007-101, with control tube, P/N 430-001-007-

105, requires 3 work-hours for a labor cost of $255. Parts cost $3,974 for a total cost per 

helicopter of $4,229. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Fuller