**SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST** ( In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SI P Submitted by : Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Date Submitted: March 16, 2012 Subject: Administrative Revisions

- Citations to the Munici pal Waste L andfills and Open Burning Regulations
Completeness Review Completed by : Harold A. Frankford D ate Completed: April 5, 2012 **Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE** 

**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 1. Letter dated March 16, 2012 from David K. Pay lor , Director, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (the Governor’s designee) to Diana E sher , EPA Region I II. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as wel l as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a sunset or expiration date. I f so it is not acceptable as a SI P submission. 2. Under the authority of § 10.1

- 1308 of the Code of Virginia, the Department of Environmental Quality (“the Department”) adopted the amendment on June 10, 2011 which revises the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations cited in 9VAC5 Chapter 40, Part I , Article 43 and 9 VAC 5 C hapter 130, Part I

. The Department published the adopted final rules in the February 1 3 , 20 12 Virginia Register of Regulations , and established an effective date of August 17, 2011 . There are no sunset or expiration dates. X

3. Evidence that the St ate has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. The necessary legal authority

to adopt and implement this plan revision is established under § 10.1

- 1308 of the Code of Virginia. X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4. A copy of the revised text for 9VAC5 Chapte r 40, Part I , Article 43 and 9 VAC 5 Chapter 130 is included in this SI P revision submittal as Enclosure 1. The adoption date is June 10 , 2011 and the effective date is August 17, 2011

. X2 **EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural

r equirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. The Department submitted proof that all Commonwealth administrative procedures were followed. The revisions to were published in the February 1 3 , 2012 Virginia Register after being duly

adopted by

the State Air Pollution Control Board on Jun 10, 2011 , certified by the Office of the Attorney General as within the Board’s statutory authority and thus fully

enforceable under Virginia law, and su bmitted to the Virginia Registrar on behalf of the Board by

the Department as a true and accurate copy of the duly

adopted regulation

. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, includi ng the date of publication of such notice. 6. On February 13 , 2012, Virginia announced in the Virginia Register the opportunity

for public comment and request for a public hearing. The public comment period ended on March 14, 2012, and no one requested a public hearing. Notice was also given to EPA, the States of Maryland and Tennessee, and the District of Columbia, all in accordance with the requirements for 40 CFR § 51.102(d). X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. Virginia DEQ reported that since no one requested a public hearing, no hearing was held. See , 40 CFR § 51.102(a) and (d), and Appendix V of 40 CFR part 51, S ection 2.1(f). X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 8. Virginia reported that it received no testimony on this revision during the public comment period. X
**Technical Materials** 1. I dentification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Not Applicable

2. I dentification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of th e locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Not Applicable

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected so urces or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 3. Not Applicable3 **EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility , as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implement ed. 4. Not Applicable

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analy sis. 5. Not Applicable

6. Evidence, where necessary , that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology

. 6. Not Applicable
7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary , to ensure emission levels. 7. Not Applicable

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8. Not Applicable
9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (I f a policy is not appropriate, explain why .) 9. Not Applicable

10. A Section 107 reques t must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 y ears after redesignation. 10. Not Applicable