alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL CONCRETE SUPPLY CO 

Page 37.1.182
Page 37.1.183

 -
 

Page 37.1.184

 

- 0 
Page 37.1.185

1 -
 

 

Page 37.1.186

CHUCK’S BRAKE AND WHEEL 

Page 37.1.188
Page 37.1.189
Page 37.1.190


CLUTCH & BRAKE XCHANGE, INC. 

Page 37.1.193
Page 37.1.194
 

Page 37.1.195
Page 37.1.196
Page 37.1.197

COAST COUNTIES TRUCK & EQUIP (LOCAL 1101, -15)

Page 37.1.199
Page 37.1.200
#### James A. HARRISON, Petitioner, v. Inez P. HARRISON, Respondent.

No. 44658.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 5, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 284 So.2d 13.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Page 37.1.561

 
 

Page 37.1.562

LESTER G LAWRENCE & SON VOLVO 

Page 37.1.564
Page 37.1.565

 

 
Page 37.1.566


LEXUS OF PLEASANTON 

Page 37.1.569

Page 37.1.571
 

Page 37.1.572
Page 37.1.573
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 63144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-82-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

November 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 12, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed 
a request with the Commission in Docket No. CP98-82-000, pursuant to 
Sections 157.205, and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to install and operate a new 
delivery point authorized in blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP82-401-000, all as more fully set forth in the request on file with 
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Northern proposes to install and operate a new delivery point, 
located in Green County, Wisconsin, which would accommodate natural gas 
deliveries to Wisconsin Gas Company (WGC) to be used to serve a local 
residential customer. Northern states that the proposed volumes to be 
delivered for WGC would be 1 MMBtu on a peak day and 104 MMBtu on an 
annual basis. Northern further states that the estimated cost of 
constructing the proposed delivery point would be $6,500.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31000 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60723-60724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29672]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the President's Cancer Panel.
    This meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance by the public limited to space available. Individuals who 
plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretatin or other reasonable accommodations, should notify Linda 
Quick-Cameron, Committee Management Officer, National Cancer Institute, 
Executive Plaza North, Room 609, 6130 Executive Blvd., MSC 7410, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7410 (301/496-5708). A summary of the meeting and 
the roster of committee members will be provided upon request. Other 
information pertaining to the meeting may be obtained from the contact 
person indicated below.

    Committee Name: President's Cancer Panel.
    Date: November 21, 1997.
    Place: Moffitt Cancer Center, Research Center (Across from 
Cancer Center), 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612.
    Open: 8:00 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Agenda: Concerns of special populations in the National Cancer 
Program:

[[Page 60724]]

responsiveness of the health care system to the needs of special 
populations.
    Contact Person: Maureen O. Wilson, Ph.D, Executive Secretary, 
National Cancer Institute, Building 31, Room 4A48, Bethesda, MD 
20892, Telephone: (301) 496-1148.

    Dated: November 3, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29672 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30606]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the 
Special Bond Of Indemnity to the United States of America.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 23, 
1998, to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form and instructions should be directed to Vicki S. 
Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 
26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Special Bond of Indemnity to the United States of America.
    OMB Number: 1535-0062.
    Form Number: PD F 2966.
    Abstract: The information is requested to support a request for 
refund of the purchase price of savings bonds purchased in a chain 
letter scheme.
    Current Actions: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Individuals.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,000.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 8 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 665.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: November 17, 1997.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-30606 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30480]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)


The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) of the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Cancellation of 
Meeting

    This notice announces the cancellation of a previously announced 
meeting: Workshop on Screening and Tracking Systems for Early Hearing 
Detection and Intervention (EHDI).
    Federal Register Notice Citation of Previous Announcement: FR Doc. 
17oc97-115. Published October 17, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 200, Page 
54116).
    Previously Announced Times and Dates: 8 a.m.-5 p.m. December 11, 
1997. 8:30 a.m.-1 p.m. December 12, 1997.
    Change in the Meeting: This meeting has been canceled.

Contact Person for More Information: June Holstrum, Ph.D., Division of 
Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, NCEH, 4770 Buford 
Highway, NE, M/S F-15, Atlanta, Georgia 30341. E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c2a7aaa6ab82a1a6a1eca5adb4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8ddd0dcd1f8dbdcdb96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>, 
telephone 770/488-7401, fax 770/488-7361.

    Dated: November 13, 1997.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-30480 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00896

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.V.H. , a Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 02676

Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Appellant is unable to afford payment of costs. No costs of court are taxed in this appeal.

SIGNED Ma rch 13 , 2019.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Page 16.0

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Checklist Item #16

Does the application describe the steps the plan sponsor has taken to ensure that notices 

delivered electronically are reasonably accessible to the recipients?

See section 4.05(3).

Not applicable. The Plan is not delivering notices electronically to participants.
#### ALLEGHENY MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 77-463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 16, 1978.

Stuart R. Mishkin, Miami, for appellant.

*805Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and John P. Durant, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellee.

Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
. -\ 

### ,. ._, I. ’ i;r- -A_ 6;1:~ ; SC. : lg.?&:. h”- n&c I 1 **OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

**. “**  ***&I) G.**  **IYAYN**

**_ .mnsr**  **.. ““**  **h.**

**i**

. .i 

## 6'79 '. , 680



### '4. A fkul io thmmu iboaroh 

### haor- &or ofthmoqbr 00Bd at 

### of ?hy8Aeo.: ?hlrU$aly **d.atlU rooeowa**  **pro)oat,io buod**  **aa a**  

### ooa- -0 tith 8ha 0, 8. Ot~ioo 01 Solratliio Rawrrch .. an4-2evolo~. It lo #uroly 8 ruo8ti proJ*ot d&h bu **bow** uudwtobwa by bw8dn **Pull-tiao w**  **w Ot**  **thW 8t8ft**  **@f thC**  **DOpUtXWBt** 

### OS n g o l or

n b a **dwotm** 

### s ll o tt hm l r l 

### pun tbo, &OYO $&l? tog&m **lBWu8lty** 

### dutieo, to **thlo** 

### -+ :;. *Iii t h a b a d8 o it h l o

**hot** 

### l

**ltwklun,** 

### I

ëuhu l a lll~~~- **lab to**  **preoont the**  **follwFag quaotioor**  "IO trio

**aaouet** of aMpenoauon pole to full; **tti*** rMulty wabuo rho putioipate in t:1roo 

### l 

### pmol8lprogrou In Oh0 -r iodlo8todl.knit.4by **the s%rmt**  

### pmagmph OS Subowotiula 

### (a) of 8hm oonorwl

kvavIoloMottho Imlmalotnl **Appre$brlatian Aot**  **ior thm**  **ounVat bloanlum?"**  **..'**

### 681 .

~lt s a. l Mt r uo t b a8l Ml8r aoo

&tthat l

owol *l&t ba l

l

### jr~t& b7 tbo lirit8tloao OS brrbmot5on (2) of tie miiazwraZ ~ovio~o~' of thm Approprlatien 

### dot; thlm submotion rtidrr

### 682 -. - 

### 685,
Exhibit 21





Subsidiaries as of March 30, 2011





City Zone Holdings Limited, a British Virgin Islands company.





Most Smart International Limited, a Hong Kong company.





Redsun Technology Company Limited, a wholly-foreign owned enterprise (“WOFE”), incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Shenzhen JiRuHai Technology Co. Limited, which is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Detian Yu Biotechnology Co. Limited, is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Jinzhong Deyu Agriculture Trading Co. Limited, which is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Jinzhong Yongcheng Agriculture Trading Co. Limited, which is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Jinzhong Yuliang Agriculture Trading Co. Limited, which is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Beijing Jundaqianyuan Investment Management Co., Ltd. is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Jinzhong Longyue Investment Consultancy Services Co., Ltd. is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Deyufarm Innovation Food (Beijing) Co., Ltd.  is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Sichuan HaoLiangXin Instant Food Co., Ltd. is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.





Beijing Xinggu Deyufarm Food Co., Ltd is incorporated in the People’s Republic of China.
# 2021 Current Law
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ABINGTON HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Respondent

v.

PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 118 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 27 th day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Did the District violate its bargaining obligation under the Public Employe Relations Act by contracting with Johnson College to teach courses for high school credit without bargaining with the exclusive employe representative

of the District’s teachers?

(2) Did the District violate its bargaining obligations under Pennsylvania law, where binding Pennsylvania precedent under the Public Employe Relations Act recognizes that contracting out any bargaining unit work affects a term and condition of employment regardle ss of whether there is an impact on employe wages and hours?

(3) Did the District violate its bargaining obligation under the Public Employe Relations Act, where Section 15

- 1525 of the Public School Code does not expressly preclude the District’s teachers fro m teaching dual enrollment courses, nor does Section 15

- 1525 of the Public School Code otherwise prohibit the District from bargaining with the exclusive representative of the District’s teachers over who is to teach high school credit courses in a dual

en rollment program?[ 118 MAL 2022 ]

- 2

Additionally, the parties are directed to provide briefing on the effect that the recent amendments to 24 P.S. § 15

- 1525, see Act of July 8, 2022, P.L. 620, No. 55, have on the

above issues.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10-c


To:  VIKING ASSET PURCHASER No 7 IC (the “Purchaser”) and Citicorp Trustee Company Limited
23 January 2018
Dear Sirs,
Extension of a receivables purchase agreement between the Purchaser and ourselves as Seller dated 2 February 2012 as amended and extended from time to time (the “Receivables Purchase Agreement”).
We refer to the Receivables Purchase Agreement. We write to record the terms and conditions upon which the parties have agreed to extend the Receivables Purchase Agreement. 
In the definition of Termination Event, sub-clause (a) which appears in Clause 1 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the reference to “six (6) years“ shall be replaced by “ten (10) years”, which, for the avoidance of doubt, means that the Receivables Purchase Agreement will terminate on 2 February 2022. 
Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained in this Letter of Agreement by signing and returning the enclosed duplicate.
Yours faithfully,
for and on behalf of


MERITOR HEAVY VEHICLE BRAKING SYSTEMS (UK) LIMITED


By: /s/ Scott McGregor             
Name: Scott McGregor 
Title: Director
For and on behalf of
VIKING ASSET PURCHASER No 7 IC


By: /s/ Cheryl Heslop             
Name: Cheryl Heslop 
Title: Director 

We accept the terms and conditions set out in the Letter of Agreement of which the foregoing is the duplicate.
for and on behalf of 
Citicorp Trustee Company Limited
By: /s/ David Mares             
Name: David Mares 
Title: Director
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Energy Group (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Vajda,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






         /s/ David J. Vajda
---------------------------------------
             David J. Vajda
      Principal Financial Officer

Date:        May 7, 2004
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Brian L. Roberts, certify that:

Date:
November 12, 2004

/s/BRIAN L. ROBERTS

---

Name: Brian L. Roberts
Chief Executive Officer

---



I, Lawrence S. Smith, certify that:

Date:
November 12, 2004

/s/LAWRENCE S. SMITH

---

Name: Lawrence S. Smith
Co-Chief Financial Officer

---



I, John R. Alchin, certify that:

Date:
November 12, 2004

/s/JOHN R. ALCHIN

---

Name: John R. Alchin
Co-Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### Charles SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-854.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 28, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Scott Forbes, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Texas-New Mexico Power Company; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and as presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and; 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 3, 2004
#### Dynamic Delivery Corp., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 95500.)

[735 NYS2d 755]

Judgment of the Court of Claims of the State of New York (S. Michael Nadel, J.), entered on or about December 8, 2000, after trial, in a proceeding to value property appropriated by the State under its power of eminent domain, awarding claimant $8,376,382.06, inclusive of interest from September 16, 1996, the date of vesting, for the property known as Route 9A, Miller Arterial Highway, City and County of New York, Map No. 9, Parcel No. 9, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We reject claimant’s argument that since the highest and best use of the vacant property is for a surface parking lot, it must be valued on the basis of dollars per square foot of land, and that to value the property, as the Court of Claims did, on the basis of dollars per square foot of floor area that can be developed under the property’s floor area ratio (FAR) is to impermissibly predicate a highest and best use other than parking. As the Court of Claims explained *(see, Matter of City of New York,*98 AD2d 166, 190-191), the common denominator between claimant’s purported comparables, which are zoned *228with a FAR of 5, 6 or 10, and the subject property, which is zoned with a FAR of 2, is development potential, the importance of which even claimant’s appraisal recognized, albeit with a subjective adjustment to each of the comparable sales that is inappropriate given the availability of *“a*readily calculable objective factor.” Nor should the award be increased by the value of transferable development rights, where claimant presented no evidence of the market value of air rights and defendant’s appraiser testified as to the lack of market for such rights in the area at the time of the vesting. We have considered claimant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.