alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Gas Company for
the three months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000022620
<NAME> COMMONWEALTH GAS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          255,240
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>              0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              90,934
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            28,258
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     374,432
<COMMON>                            71,425
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,739
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 27,429
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     126,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                74,450
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  38,710
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>        3,650
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     131,029
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      374,432
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          132,313
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                10,450
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         102,738
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         113,188
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             19,125
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                      76
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      19,201
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             2,628
<NET-INCOME>                        16,573
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       16,573
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            1,656
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              34,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, etc., Petitioner, v. Gilbert FEIN, Respondent.

No. 42668.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 28, 1972.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 17679 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:06

- cr - 00298

- WKW

- SRW

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus REGINALD LASHAWN SAWYER, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th e Middle District of Alabama

________________________ (January 3, 201 9)

Before WILSON , ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-17679 Date Filed: 01/03/2019 Page: 1 of 32 Reginal d Lashawn Sawyer appeals the district court’s sua sponte determination that he is not eligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2)

. Sawyer contends on appeal that: (1) he is eligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c) (2) because the Sentencing Commission, through Amendment 782, subsequently lowered the Guidelines range s applicable to his sentence, as calculated under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c ) ; and (2) the district court abused its discretion by determining Sawyer would not be entitled to a sentence reduction even if he were eligible under § 3582(c)(2). We need not address Sawyer’s second contention because we conclude Sawyer was ineligible for relief under § 3582(c) (2)

. A defendant may be entitled to a reduced sentence under § 3582(c)(2) if he “has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (emphasis added)

. While this appeal was pen ding, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Koons v. United States , 138 S. Ct. 1783 (2018). Koons held
that sentence s are not “based on ” Guidelines ranges that subsequently have been lowered by the Sentencing Commission” if “ the range s play [ed] no relev ant part in the judge’s determination of the defendant’s ultimate sentence. ” Id. at 1788 (quotation and alteration omitted). Because the petitioners in Koons received
sentences “ based on ” mandatory minimum s and substantial assistance to the

Case: 16-17679 Date Filed: 01/03/2019 Page: 2 of 33 Government , and not on Guidelines ranges that subsequently were lowered by the Sentencing Commission, t he petitioners did not qualify for reduced sentences under § 3582(c)(2). Id.
Koons is dispositive of Sawyer’s appeal. Like the petitioners in Koons , Sawyer’s sentence was based on mandatory minimums and substantial assistance to the Government. The Guidelines range s for Sawyer’s drug offenses , which subsequently have been lowered by the Sentencing Commission, “play[ed] no relevant part in the judge’s determination of [Sawyer’s] ultimate sentence.” Id. Consequently, Sawyer is not eligible for a reduced sentence under § 3582(c)(2). AFFIRMED . Case: 16-17679 Date Filed: 01/03/2019 Page: 3 of 3
IN THE COURT OF APPEA LS AT KNOXVILLE

C. M. REAGAN ) HAMILTON COUNTY ) 03A01-9805-CH-00173 Plaintiff-Appellee ) ) ) v. ) ) HON. R. VANN OWEN S, ) CHANCELLOR TROY MALONE, SANDRA MALONE ) and DAN CONNELLY ) ) AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED Defendants-Ap

pellants ) and REMANDED

MARVIN BERKE OF CHATTANOOGA FOR APPELLANT DAN CONNELLY SCOTT N. BROWN, JR., and SCOTT A. MILLER OF CHATTANOOGA FOR APPELLEE
O P I N I O N Goddard, P.J. This is an appeal by Dan Connelly from an order entered by the Chancellor pursuant to a motion by C. M. Reagan, seeking to discover assets of Mr. Connelly for the purpose of satisfying a judgment rendered in Mr. Reagan’s favor.

Because the Chancellor was of the opinion that Mr. Connelly was not honoring previous orders to produce documents, he entered an order (see appendix), which is the subject of this appeal. 

# FILED November 23, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk2 During oral argument in this Court, counsel for Mr. Reagan conceded that he had received all the necessary information addressed by the Chancellor’s order, exce pt the bank records from the Northwest Georgia Bank.

Counsel for Mr. Connelly conceded that he and his client would have no objection to counsel for Mr. Reagan examining the Georgia bank records provided counsel for Mr. Connelly could be present when they were examined.

In light of the conc

essions on both sides , the Court vacate s the order previ

ously entered by the Cha

ncellor, excep

t that part of the or

der relating to the

Georgia Bank, wh

ich will remain in full force and effect, provided counsel for Mr. Connelly has the opportunity to be present when any bank records are examined.

For the foregoing

reasons the judgme

nt of the Trial Cour

t, as modified, is affirmed and the cause remanded for such proceedings, if any, as may be nec essary and collection of costs below. Costs of appeal, as are costs below, are adjudged one-half against Mr. Reagan and one-half against Mr. Connelly.

_______________________________ Houston M. Goddard, P.J. CONCUR:

________________________________ Herschel P. Frank

s, J.3

(Not Participating) Don T. McMurray,

J.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William A. HARGISS.

No. 53828.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 1973.

In re: William A. Hargiss applying for certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ granted. See Order.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It 'is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Richard P. Boyd, Jr., Judge of the Seventh Judicial District Court, for the Parish of Catahoula, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 2nd day of November, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 10th day of December, 1973, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1790 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1790

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to require the 
    Secretary of Health and Human Services to set forth a method of 
determining maximum out-of-pocket limits and annual updates to premium 
                        tax credit eligibility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

 Mrs. Axne (for herself, Ms. Matsui, and Mr. Horsford) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to require the 
    Secretary of Health and Human Services to set forth a method of 
determining maximum out-of-pocket limits and annual updates to premium 
                        tax credit eligibility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Indexing for Health Care 
Affordability Act''.

SEC. 2. PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT PERCENTAGE.

    Section 1302(c)(4) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(c)(4)) is amended by striking ``calendar year)'' 
and inserting ``calendar year, based on estimates and projections for 
the applicable calendar year of the percentage (if any) by which the 
average per enrollee premium for employer-sponsored insurance exceeds 
such average per enrollee premium for the preceding calendar year, as 
published in the National Health Expenditure Accounts)''.
                                 <all>
```
Job Corps is the nation’s largest career technical training and 

education program for low-income students ages 16 through 

24. Established in 1964, Job Corps serves 60,000 young 

people each year. 

What is Job Corps? 

WHERE IS JOB CORPS? 

There are 125 Job Corps centers 


located in 48 states, the District 


of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. 


To support all of the centers, 


Job Corps also manages outreach, 


admissions, and career transition 


operations at hundreds of 


locations nationwide.
 

TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

The Career Development Services System (CDSS) is 

Job Corps’ approach for providing seamless services 

to students, including recruitment, education, career 

training, job assistance, and transitional support 

services after graduation. Upon 

joining Job Corps, each student 

works with staff to develop an 

individualized Personal Career 

Development Plan (PCDP) to stay 

on track for success. 

Students receive hands-on training 

in more than 100 career areas in 

fi elds such as construction, business 

and fi nance, health care, and 

information technology. They can also participate 

in on-the-job training at real work sites through 

work-based learning opportunities. In the academic 

classroom, students have the opportunity to earn a 

high school diploma or GED, and learn employability 

and independent-living skills. 

While enrolled in the program, students receive 

housing, meals, basic medical care, and biweekly 

living allowances. 

Job Corps also has a strict Zero Tolerance Policy for 

drugs and violence. Since Job Corps is a self-paced 

program, and lengths of stay vary, students may 

remain enrolled for up to 2 years. 

GREEN 

TRAINING 

Job Corps is committed to 

the development of green 

job training and preparing 

students for successful careers 

in the green economy. 

All students who enter the 

advanced manufacturing, automotive and machine 

repair, or construction career technical training areas 

will develop specifi c knowledge and skills related to 

green technology and industry practices. 

AFTER GRADUATION 

Job Corps works with its 

graduates to help them fi nd good 

jobs in high-growth industries 

with employers across the country. 

Employers save time and money 

by hiring skilled Job Corps 

graduates who are trained on 

industry procedures and equipment. 

Job Corps graduates receive transitional support 

services, including help locating a job, housing, child 

care, and transportation, for up to 21 months after 

they leave the program. 

WANT TO KNOW MORE? 

Contact www.jobcorps.gov 

or (800) 733-JOBS [5627]. 

Administered by the U.S. Department of Success Lasts Success Lasts Labor, Job Corps is the nation’s largest 

career technical training and education 

program for low-income students ages 16 

through 24. Job Corps is a U.S. Department 

of Labor Equal Opportunity Employer 

Program. Auxiliary aids and services are 

available upon request to individuals with 

disabilities. TDD/TTY telephone number is 

A Lifetime. A Lifetime. 

(877) 889-5627. 

00014.07.11 
Job Corps Center Locations
 

*Coming Soon 

Ottumwa 

Updated July 2011
#### David Kenneth TURNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 1974.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, and David Kenneth Turner, in pro.- per., for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to two consecutive five year sentences after a jury trial on four-counts of possession and sale of a narcotic drug.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed by the parties herein. Upon our consideration thereof, we are of the view that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the judgment and sentences appealed herein, and the same are therefore

Affirmed.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: January

24, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: November 12, 2014 M eeting with AWEA Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan

for Existing Power Plants On November 12, 2014 , Matt Clouse of EPA - OAP and Howard J. Hoffman of EPA - OGC met by telephone with Gene Grace of the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA ) to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Pow er Plan for existing power plants.
Exhibit 8.1
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
    
    Ascendium Group Limited (incorporated in the British Virgin Islands)
    
    Our Medical Services, Ltd. (incorporated in the British Virgin Islands)
    
    China Medical Services Holdings Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong)
    
    Cyber Medical Network Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong)
    
    King Cheers Holding Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong)
    
    China Medstar Pte. Ltd. (incorporated in Singapore)
    
    CMS Hospital Management Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Beijing Xing Heng Feng Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Shenzhen Aohua Medical Services Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Shenzhen Aohua Medical Leasing and Services Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
    
    Medstar (Shanghai) Leasing Co., Ltd. (incorporated in the PRC)
Order entered January 29, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01339-CR

DAYLIN BRIGGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-75450-R

ORDER

Appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed on October 28, 2019. The clerk’s record, 

filed December 6, 2019, shows appellant requested the reporter’s record on October 31, 2019.

The reporter’s record was due December 7, 2019. When in was not filed, we notified 

court reporter Georgina Ware by postcard dated December 11, 2019 and directed her to file by 

January 10, 2020 (1) the reporter’s record, (2) written verification that no hearings were 

recorded, or (3) written verification appellant had not requested the reporter’s record. To date, 

Ms. Ware has not filed the reporter’s record, informed the Court no record was recorded, or 

otherwise communicated with the Court about the record.

We ORDER the reporter’s record filed by February 18, 2020. We caution Ms. Ware 

that the failure to do so may result in the Court taking whatever remedies it has to ensure this 
appeal proceeds in a timely fashion, including ordering she not sit until the complete reporter’s 

record is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Jennifer Bennett, 

Presiding Judge, 265th Judicial District Court; to Georgina Ware, official court reporter, 265th 

Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

 

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30793]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; 
Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Assistant 
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, with authority to redelegate, 
all the authorities under Sections 403(a)(5)(G), (H), and (I) of the 
Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 603(a)(5)G), (H), 
and (I).
    These delegations shall be exercised under the Department's 
existing delegation of authority and policy on regulations. In 
addition, I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by you or your 
subordinates that involved the exercise of the authorities delegated 
herein prior to the effective date of the delegation. This delegation 
is effective immediately.

    Dated: November 12, 1997.
Donna E. Shalala,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30793 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[UT-056-1430-01-24-1A]


Notice of Intent to Amend Plan

SUMMARY: This Notice of Intent is to advise the public that the Bureau 
of Land Management (BLM) intends to consider proposals which would 
require amending an existing planning document.

DATES: The comment period for this proposed plan amendment will 
commence with publication of this notice. Comments must be submitted on 
or before March 10, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Henderson, Sevier River Resource 
Area Manager, 150 East 900 North, Richfield, Utah 84701. Existing 
planning documents and information are available at the above address 
or telephone (801)896-1500. Comments on the proposed plan amendment 
should be sent to the above address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM is proposing to amend the Mountain 
Valley Management Framework Plan which includes public lands in Piute 
County and Sevier County, Utah. The purpose of the amendment would be 
to identify certain lands as suitable for direct sale pursuant to 
Section 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. The 
lands identified for direct sale comprise 15.0 acres described as 
follows: T. 26 S., R. 1 W., Sec. 11, S1/2NE1/4NE1/4SE1/4 and T. 30 S., 
R. 4 W., Section 23, SE1/4SW1/4SW1/4, Salt Lake Meridian, Utah. The 
existing plan does not identify these lands for disposal. However, 
because of the resource values and public values and objectives 
involved, the public interest may well be served by sale of these 
lands. An environmental assessment will be prepared by an 
interdisciplinary team to analyze the impacts of this proposal and 
alternatives.

Joseph L. Jewkes,
Acting State Director, Utah.
[FR Doc. 97-3059 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER SUPPLY INJECTION WELL FEE WORKSHEET (SUBMIT THIS WORKSHEET WITH EACH PROJECT) ACTIVITY FEE PAID FEE DUE 1. Innovative technology wells at $1000.00 per project =$ $ 2. Storm water drainage wells (sinkhole modification, or drilled): Subdivisions at $500.00 per project =$ $ Commercial/industrial facilities $750.00 per project =$ $ 3. Commercial/industrial geothermal wells: Open loop systems at $750.00 per facility =$ $ 4. Commercial/industrial SFDS and infiltration cells at $500.00 per facility =$ $ 5. Large capacity septic systems at $250.00 per facility =$ $ Churches at $100.00 per facility =$ $ 6. Remediation wells: Oversight under this rule at $1000.00 per project =$ $ Oversight by the Department not under this rule = N/A 7. Renewal of storm water drainage wells commercial/ industrial facilities at $350.00 per facility =$ $ 8. Renewal of commercial/industrial geothermal wells open loop at $350.00 per facility =$ $ 9. Renewal of commercial/industrial SFDS and infiltration cells at $250.00 per facility =$ $ 10. Renewal of large capacity septic systems at $250.00 per facility =$ $ Churches $50.00 TOTAL INJECTION WELL FEE PAID =$ TOTAL INJECTION FEE DUE = $ Make checks payable to the Treasurer, State of Tennessee and submit to: Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Water Supply, 6th Floor L & C Tower, 401 Church Street Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1549 Name of Project: County: Engineer/Owner: Payment by: Engineer Other: Address:

STATE USE ONLY FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PROJECT #: Postmark Date: Date Received: Check #: Cash Deposit #: Comments: Receipt #: Cash Deposit #:

CN-1189 RDA 2474