alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the 
Authorization for purchase and request for change of United States 
Series EE Savings Bonds.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 23, 
1998, to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form and instructions should be directed to Vicki S. 
Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 
26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Authorization For Purchase And Request For Change United 
States Savings Bonds.
    OMB Number: 1535-0111.
    Form Numbers: SB 2152 and SB 2153.
    Abstract: The information is requested to support a request by 
employees to authorize employers to allot funds from their pay for the 
purchase of savings bonds.
    Current Actions: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Individuals.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,600,000.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 1 minute.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 33,333.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: November 17, 1997.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-30607 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Strambi, the chief financial officer of TeleNav, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By:

/S/    MICHAEL
STRAMBIMichael StrambiChief Financial OfficerDate: September 11, 2012
#### Louis GHELFI, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-421.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 16, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1970.

*594Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, and Natalie Baskin, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Arden M. Siegendorf and Ronald Sabo, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 1.850, “CrPR”, 33 F.S.A. after a full evidentiary hearing.

Appellant, Ghelfi, challenges the legality of his arrest and the validity of the subsequent search and seizure of certain evidence. He urges that his constitutional rights were violated by the allegedly illegal arrest and search and seizure.

In a case involving the same issues generally, this court determined on essentially the same set of facts that the arrest of a co-defendant, Bretti, was based on probable cause and that the search therein was made with -consent. Bretti v. State, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 6.

Ghelfi testified that he never gave consent for a search. The testimony of one of the officers was that consent was given. The conflict in testimony was resolved by the trial judge in favor of the officer. See Slater v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 453; Johnson v. State, 157 Fla. 685, 27 So.2d 276 (1946); and Myrick v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 845.

The fact that a person is in custody or under arrest “does not in and of itself deprive his consent of the free and voluntary quality which is essential.” Rinehart v. State, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 487, cert. dismissed, Fla.1960, 121 So.2d 654, cert. denied 365 U.S. 849, 81 S.Ct. 812, 5 L.Ed.2d 813 (1961); accord, United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65, 64 S.Ct. 896, 88 L.Ed. 1140 (1944); and Bretti v. State, supra.

We uphold the finding of the trial judge that there was probable cause to make the arrest and that there was consent given for the subsequent search. Cf. Bretti, supra.

Ghelfi also argues that the state failed to comply with the requirements of § 901.-23, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

We find no assignment of error directed to the point that the state violated the statutory requirements of § 901.-23, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and find no allegation in the Rule 1.850 motion that the state violated any rights or duties under that statute. Cf. Palmieri v. State, Fla.1967, 198 So.2d 633, cert. dismissed, 89 *595S.Ct. 440, 393 U.S. 218, 21 L.Ed.2d 389 (1968).

For these reasons the order denying defendant’s Rule 1.850 motion be and the same is hereby

Affirmed.
p.1 

OAR Box 1112 

Prepped by Ryan Dugan 

Document Number: 

7) ll-B-2d 

Docket Number: 

A-83-22 

Printed 4/16/2008 9:12:06 AM Sheet 7 of 97 
P.2 

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY *'n '*• * 

9700 Sou-rk CASS AVENUE, ARQC-NNE, Illinois 60459 TEIEPIONE 512/972- 84 30 

April 1, 1985 

Dr. Kim Dietrich 

University of Cincinnati 

Kettering Laboratory 

Cincinnati, OH 45263 

Dear Kim: 

On behalf of the U.S. EPA, I would like to thank you for your willingness to participate in the lead risk assessment study. Your judgments about 

possible effects of lead on the IQ of children are critically needed. Tom 

Wallsten and I are very much looking forward to discussing these issues at our 

meeting with you on Thursday, April 18 at 9 a.m. 

Enclosed is a copy of the latest version of our IQ protocol which will 

be the basis of our interview session with you. Should you have any questions 

before we meet, please do not hestiate to give me a call. 

Respectfully, 

lonald G. Whitfield 

Decision and System Sciences Section 

Energy and Environmental Systems Division 

RGWrbf 

Enclosure 

U.S. DEPARTMENT of EMERGE TIHE IhivERSiTy of GniCAqo
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62323-62324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Blood Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Blood Products Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 11, 1997, 8 
a.m. to 6 p.m., and December 12, 1997, 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Location: DoubleTree Hotel, Plazas I, II, and III, 1750 Rockville 
Pike, Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: Linda A. Smallwood, Center for Biologics Evaluation 
and Research (HFM-350), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville 
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-3514, or FDA Advisory Committee 
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC 
area), code 12388. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date 
information on this meeting.
    Agenda: On December 11, 1997, the committee will discuss and 
provide recommendations on the issue of FDA's donor deferral policy 
regarding men who have had sex with another man even one time since 
1977.
    On the morning of December 12, 1997, the committee will sit as a 
medical device panel and make recommendations on the issue of in vitro 
diagnostic detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load, 
sponsor, Roche Molecular Systems. In the afternoon, the Committee will 
hear an informational presentation on hepatitis C virus (HCV) risk in 
sexual partners of positive individuals.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by December 1, 
1997. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 1 p.m. and 4:30 p.m., on December 11, 1997, and between 
approximately 10 a.m. and 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. and 3 p.m., on December 
12, 1997. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those 
desiring to make formal oral presentations should notify the contact 
person before December 1, 1997, and submit a brief statement of the 
general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the 
names and addresses of proposed participants, and

[[Page 62324]]

an indication of the approximate time requested to make their 
presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: November 14, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-30615 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
#### In re the ESTATE of Soloman J. PARRISH. Clara Belle ANDERSON, as Executrix of the Estate of Soloman J. Parrish, Deceased, Appellant, v. Rossie HENDRICKSON, as Guardian of Soloman Joseph Parrish, a minor, Appellee.

No. 73-135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 30, 1973.

John M. McCormick, Orlando, for respondent-appellant.

Lloyd Campbell, Cocoa, and Thomas B. Tart of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, Orlando, for petitioner-appellee.

WALDEN, Judge.

The appealed order determined that certain real estate was homestead and thus not subject to devise under decedent’s will. This served to vest the property in decedent’s child. The Executrix and beneficiary under the will appeals. We affirm.

The trial court carefully considered the problem and delineated the facts and applicable law in comprehensive fashion. We expressly approve the findings and conclusion found in the judgment. We do this upon authority of Vandiver v. Vincent, Fla.App.1962, 139 So.2d 704; Brodgon v. McBride, Fla. 1954, 75 So.2d 770; Lockhart v. Sasser, 1945, 156 Fla. 339, 22 So.2d 763; Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Sauls, 1929, 98 Fla. 339, 123 So. 780; Larsen v. Austin, Fla. 1951, 54 So.2d 63; Contra, In re Estate of Van Meter, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 639, aff’d Fla. 1970, 231 So.2d 524.

Affirmed.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1823 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1823

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the matching 
 requirement for a territory to use specially allocated Federal funds 
     for Medicare covered part D drugs for low-income individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

Miss Gonzalez-Colon (for herself and Mr. Soto) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the matching 
 requirement for a territory to use specially allocated Federal funds 
     for Medicare covered part D drugs for low-income individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVING MATCHING REQUIREMENT FOR A TERRITORY TO USE 
              SPECIALLY ALLOCATED FEDERAL FUNDS FOR MEDICARE COVERED 
              PART D DRUGS FOR LOW-INCOME INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1935(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396u-5(e)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting before the period 
at the end the following: ``and the Federal medical assistance 
percentage shall be 100 percent for expenditures under such plan that 
are attributable to this subsection and the additional amounts provided 
under paragraph (3)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1905(b) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) is amended by striking ``section 1933(d)'' and 
inserting ``sections 1933(d) and 1935(e)(1)(B)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts expended for fiscal periods beginning on or after 
October 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1810 

To reauthorize the Last Green Valley National Heritage Corridor and the 

Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Mrs. HAYES, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, and 

Mr. NEAL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Last Green Valley National Heritage Corridor and the Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Last Green Valley Na5 tional Heritage Corridor and the Upper Housatonic Valley 

6 National Heritage Area Reauthorization Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1810 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE LAST GREEN VALLEY 

2 NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR AND THE 

3 UPPER HOUSATONIC VALLEY NATIONAL HER4 ITAGE AREA. 

5 (a) LAST GREEN VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE

6 CORRIDOR.— 

7 (1) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 106(b) of the 

8 Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National 

9 Heritage Corridor Act of 1994 (54 U.S.C. 320101 

10 note; Public Law 103–449; 108 Stat. 4755; 113 

11 Stat. 1728; 123 Stat. 1291; 128 Stat. 3802) is 

12 amended by striking ‘‘2021’’ and inserting ‘‘2036’’. 

13 (2) REPEAL OF TOTAL FUNDING CAP.—Section 

14 109(a) of the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Val15 ley National Heritage Corridor Act of 1994 (54 

16 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 103–449; 108 Stat. 

17 4756; 113 Stat. 1729; 123 Stat. 1292) is amended 

18 by striking the second sentence. 

19 (b) UPPER HOUSATONIC VALLEY NATIONAL HERIT20 AGE AREA.— 

21 (1) REPEAL OF TOTAL FUNDING CAP.—Section 

22 280A(a) of the Upper Housatonic Valley National 

23 Heritage Area Act (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public 

24 Law 109–338; 120 Stat. 1819) is amended by strik25 ing the second sentence. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1810 IH

1 (2) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 280B of the 

2 Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area 

3 Act (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 109–338; 

4 120 Stat. 1819) is amended by striking ‘‘15 years’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘30 years’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.2 – CFO Certification**








**ROYAL
      INVEST INTERNATIONAL CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Invest
      International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathan Lapkin, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.





By:
      /s/ Nathan Lapkin


Nathan
      Lapkin


Chief
      Financial Officer





August
      14, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Royal Invest International Corp., and will be retained by Royal
      Invest International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-Qof Computer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31,2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Michael J. Shea, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

 

1. the Periodic Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | May 10, 2005       | /s/  Michael J. Shea |
|--------|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|   | MICHAEL J. SHEA         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Kpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”).  Such certificationwill not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

1

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARAKSI SEROPOVNA 

TOKRAMADZHYAN, AKA Araksi 

Seropovna Tokramdzhyan, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-71369 

Agency No. A028-137-853 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 23, 2017**

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Araksi Seropovna Tokramadzhyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, 

petitions for review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.31(a) that she did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture and 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 26 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71369 

thus is not entitled to relief from her reinstated removal order. We have 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. See Martinez v. Sessions, No. 14-70339, 2017 

WL 4552543 (9th Cir. Oct. 12, 2017). We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s 

factual findings, Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016), and 

we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Tokramadzhyan failed 

to establish a reasonable possibility of future persecution in Armenia on account of 

a protected ground. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1185 (9th Cir. 2003) 

(to qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that it is more 

probable than not that she would suffer future persecution); see also Nagoulko v. 

INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) (possibility of future persecution “too 

speculative”).

Substantial evidence also supports the conclusion that Tokramadzhyan failed 

to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or 

acquiescence of the Armenian government. See Andrade-Garcia, 828 F.3d at 836-

37. 

The government’s unopposed motion to supplement the administrative 

record (Docket Entry No. 14) is granted.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.