alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.26

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

 

This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of June 15, 2017, is entered into by and between FTS International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Michael Doss, a resident of Texas (“Executive”).

 

RECITALS:

 

A.                                    The Company and Executive previously entered into that certain Severance Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2016 (the “Agreement”); and

 

B.                                    The Agreement has a Term of one (1) year and the Company desires to extend the Term for an additional one (1) year period.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows:

 

1.                                      Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.

 

2.                                      Amendment.  Section 1 of the Agreement is replaced in its entirety to read as follows:

 

1.                                              Severance Agreement Term.  The term of this Agreement will be for a period of two (2) years (the “Term”), commencing on the Effective Date.

 

3.                                      Other. Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms, provisions, and covenants contained in the Agreement are in all respects hereby ratified and confirmed in their entirety. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement not expressly amended hereby remain in full force and effect. Should there be any discrepancy between the terms of the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control.

 

4.                                      Governing Law and Venue.  This Amendment shall be construed under and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof. The sole and exclusive venue for any dispute arising from this Amendment shall be the state or federal courts of Tarrant County, Texas.

 

5.                                      Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and shall have the same effect as if the signatures hereto and thereto were on the same instrument.

 

[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
FTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Karen Thornton
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Karen Thornton
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   CAO
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
EXECUTIVE
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Michael Doss
    
	
 
    	
Michael   Doss
Order filed, August 29, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00440

- CV

____________ ANITA LAVEN , Appellant

V.
THBN, LLC AND SEAN A RNOLD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ANITA R. LAVE N 20334 DESERT WILLO W LAND TR UST , Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 53982



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 05, 2013

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. On July 19, 2013 , this court ordered the court rep orter to file the record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.We order Gina Wilburn , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

a ppeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Gina Wilburn does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the
reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
#### In re Justin Wayne WOOD, alias v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte Justin Wayne Wood, alias.

77-197.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 10, 1978.

Justin Wayne Wood, pro se.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BEATTY, Justice.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 355 So.2d 734 is quashed as improvidently granted.

WRIT QUASHED.

All the Justices concur.
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_____________________ _____ 09
- 16
- 00379
- CR 09
- 16
- 00380
- CR 09
- 16
- 00381
- CR

__________________________

___________________ ______________________________________________

On Appeal from the 410th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 08
- 01
- 00886
- CR and 08
- 01
- 00889
- CR (Counts 1 and 2)

_________________________________________________________________ OR DER Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the motion and bri ef to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Anna Mercedez Gutierrez, Appellant

V. The State of Texas, AppelleeAppellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We

hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification

t o this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before February 23, 2017

. See id. , 436 S.W.3d at 321

- 22. ORDER ENTERED January 24, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C .J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
#### Willie Melvin SHIVERS, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-249.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

*66Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Stephen R. Koons and Thomas M. Carney, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

On petition for writ of habeas corpus we granted petitioner delayed appellate review of his judgment and sentence on the charge of second degree murder. Having now considered the briefs and record, we find no error, and therefore affirm the judgment and sentence and deny the writ.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
#### Estaban RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Steven Rodriguez, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44596.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 9, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 283 So.2d 146.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
255 La. 484

#### William R. BERRY v. GULF COAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Westchester Fire Insurance Company.

No. 50381.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1970.

In re: Gulf Coast Construction Company and Westchester Fire Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit,Parish of Orleans. 229 So.2d 368.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29675]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER95-760-004]


Duke Energy Corporation; Notice of Filing

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that Duke Energy Corporation tendered for filing its 
refund report in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before November 17, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29675 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1862 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1862

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to carry out a 
     pilot program to improve community-based care infrastructure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

 Mrs. Trahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to carry out a 
     pilot program to improve community-based care infrastructure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY-BASED CARE 
              INFRASTRUCTURE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services may 
award grants to qualified teaching health centers (as defined in 
section 340H of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256h)) and 
behavioral health care centers (as defined by the Secretary, to include 
both substance abuse and mental health care facilities) to support the 
improvement, renovation, or modernization of infrastructure at such 
centers, including to address COVID-19 and other subsequent public 
health crises.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section, 
there is authorized to be appropriated $500,000,000 for the period of 
fiscal years 2022 through 2026.
                                 <all>
```
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

ASHRAE Equipment

December 2014

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy J. McPike, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 8, 2005



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|/s/ Cindy J. McPike                                              
|Cindy J. McPike Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Statements of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                  (in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Twelve Months                            Twelve Months
                                                 Ended September 30,                       Ended December 31,
                                                --------------------    --------------------------------------------------------
                                                  2002        2001        2001        2000        1999        1998        1997
                                                --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                             <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES:                 $  682.6    $  226.8    $  389.2    $  449.0    $  556.1    $  461.1    $  397.0
ADJUSTMENTS:
    Interest during construction                    (2.7)       (2.6)       (2.2)       (2.2)       (2.8)       (2.1)       (3.0)
    Distributed (Undistributed) equity income       (1.0)        1.8         2.2        (5.5)       (5.8)       (0.4)        3.6
    Fixed charges *                                135.6       170.8       177.9       192.8       183.8       163.3       180.5
                                                --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Earnings available                              $  814.5    $  396.8    $  567.1    $  634.1    $  731.3    $  621.9    $  578.1
*FIXED CHARGES:
    Interest on long-term and short-term debt,
     including amounts capitalized                 116.6       132.8       123.6       154.3       152.9       145.4       145.6
    Other interest                                  10.8        24.1        45.9        18.3        14.9         1.4        15.2
    Portion of rentals representing interest         8.2        13.9         8.4        20.2        16.0        16.5        19.7
                                                --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Total Fixed Charges                             $  135.6    $  170.8    $  177.9    $  192.8    $  183.8    $  163.3    $  180.5
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES              $   6.01    $   2.32    $   3.19    $   3.29    $   3.98    $   3.81    $   3.20
                                                ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>

Prior periods have been restated to reflect discontinued operations.


                                       23
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2268

FNU AMELIA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the

United States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A97-640-908)

Submitted: June 12, 2006 Decided: June 29, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven A. Morley, MORLEY, SURIN & GRIFFIN, P.C., Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, Michelle Gorden Latour, Assistant Director, John E.

Cunningham III, Trial Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Amelia does not challenge the finding that she failed to

qualify for protection under the Convention Against Torture.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Fnu Amelia, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s denial of her

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture.* 

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Amelia fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Amelia

cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of

removal. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v.

Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
|            
|------------
|            
|EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Hydroelectric
Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Liya Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                     |     |                               
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2012 |     |                               
|                     |     |                               
|                     | By: | /s/ Liya Chen                 
|                     |     |                               
|                     |     | Name: Liya Chen               
|                     |     | Title: Chief Financial Officer

---
#### BEYMER-MANN CO., Inc., Appellant, v. CROSS-COUNTRY TRUCK SERVICE, INC., etc., and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-603.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 12, 1971.

Robert H. Duckwall, of Boswell & Boswell, Bartow, for appellant.

Donald F. Wright, of Sutton & Brown, Orlando, for appellees.

MANN, Judge.

This appeal is from an order dismissing with prejudice a complaint alleging that Beymer-Mann’s agent contracted with Cross-Country, which it alleges is a “motor *carrier*or transportation broker,” for the transportation of fruit and that Cross-Country failed to deliver. The case was poorly pleaded by prior counsel, but should have survived motion to dismiss. Appellees claim that no privity is shown between Beymer-Mann and Cross-Country. This is not so, Beymer-Mann alleges that Jones, not a party, acted as its agent, and as such contracted with Cross-Country. Cross-Country argues that it is only a broker in any event, and hence not liable, but the amended complaint describes it, at least alternatively, as a carrier.

If there are other parties which need to be added, Rules 1.210 and 1.250, 30 F.S.A. are available to get into this action those who belong in it and get the matter settled. We can readily understand how the able trial judge was misled by the pleadings.

Reversed and remanded.

PIERCE, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 62540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30828]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 111


Delivery of Mail to a Commercial Mail Receiving Agency

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service published in the Federal Register (62 FR 
45366-45368) on August 27, 1997, a proposal to amend section D042.2.5 
through D042.2.7 of the Domestic Mail Manual to update and clarify 
procedures for delivery of an addressee's mail to a Commercial Mail 
Receiving Agency (CMRA). The proposal provides procedures for 
registration to act as a CMRA; an addressee to request mail delivery to 
a CMRA; and in delivery of the mail to a CMRA. The Postal Service 
requested comments by September 26, 1997. Due to several requests 
received for additional time, the Postal Service is extending the 
comment period to December 24, 1997.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule change must be received on or 
before December 24, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to Manager, Delivery, 
Operations Support, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW Room 
7142, Washington, DC 20260-2802. Copies of all written comments will be 
available for inspection and photocopying between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 
p.m., Monday through Friday, at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy E. Gamble, (202) 268-3197.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Representatives of the CMRA industry 
interested in the proposed update and clarification of procedures for 
delivery of an addressee's mail to a CMRA, has requested an extension 
of time to file comments regarding the proposed rules published on 
August 27, 1997. Central to this request is an asserted oversight by 
the industry organizations and CMRA operators of the Federal Register 
publication of August 27. The Postal Service believes that the public 
interest will be served by the fullest practicable exposition of facts 
concerning this issue and accordingly extends the time for comments 
until December 24, 1997.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 97-30828 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P