alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11


                           COMPUDYNE CORPORATION
       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE PER COMMON AND COMMON
                              EQUIVALENT SHARE





                                               Three Months Ended
                                                    March, 31,
                                                1997      1996
                                               -------    ------
 
Primary earnings per share
  Net Earnings from continuing operations      $   120    $    40
                                                ------     ------

Weighted average common and common 
 equivalent shares                               2,848      1,808
Adjustment to options                                -         28
Adjustment for preferred shares                  1,260      1,260
                                                ------     ------
                                                 4,108      3,096
                                                ======     ======

Earnings per share:                            $   .03    $   .01
                                                ======     ======

Fully diluted earnings per share:
  Earnings from continuing operations          $   120    $    40
  Adjustment for interest on promissory 
   notes                                             -         10
                                                ------     ------
        Net earnings                           $   120    $    50
                                                ======     ======

Weighted average common and common 
 equivalent shares                               2,848      3,096
Adjustment for options                               -        284
Adjustment for preferred shares                  1,260          -
                                                ------     ------
Fully diluted shares                             4,108      3,380
                                                ======     ======
Earnings per share:                            $   .03     $  .01
Opinion issued March 31, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00189-CV

———————————

IN RE JIMMIE MARK PARROTT, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Jimmie Mark Parrott, Jr., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

requesting that this Court compel the trial court in his underlying civil suit to 

“schedule a pretrial date, without delay, requiring all parties to appear; secure a 

bench warrant so that Relator can be present in person; rule on all motions and 
2

pretrial matters; and then proceed to trial the following week, not giving the 

Defendant any future continuances.” *

We deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k) (appendix must contain “a

certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document 

showing the matter complained of”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file 

with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the 

relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”); see also

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (it is relator’s burden to 

provide record sufficient to establish right to relief). Any pending motions are 

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.

 

*

The underlying case is Jimmie Mark Parrot, Jr. v. Beverly D. Melontree, cause 

number 2012-75176, pending in the 125th District Court of Harris County, Texas, 

the Honorable Kyle Carter presiding.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1822 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1822

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that certain TRICARE 
 beneficiaries who reside in Puerto Rico may enroll in TRICARE Prime, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

 Miss Gonzalez-Colon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that certain TRICARE 
 beneficiaries who reside in Puerto Rico may enroll in TRICARE Prime, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME IN PUERTO RICO.

    (a) Availability of TRICARE Prime in Puerto Rico.--Section 1097 of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(f) Availability of TRICARE Prime in Puerto Rico.--(1) In 
designating geographical areas under subsection (b)(3), the Secretary 
of Defense shall ensure that the individuals described in paragraph (2) 
may enroll in TRICARE Prime in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 
beginning not later than January 1, 2022.
    ``(2) The individuals described in this paragraph are--
            ``(A) beneficiaries covered by subsection (c) of section 
        1086 of this title, other than Medicare-eligible beneficiaries 
        described in subsection (d)(2) of such section; and
            ``(B) beneficiaries in the active-duty family member 
        category (as described in section 1075(b)(1) of this title), 
        without regard to whether such beneficiaries are dependents of 
        members who have relocated pursuant to an order for a change in 
        duty station that does not authorize the dependent to accompany 
        the member to the new duty station at the expense of the United 
        States.''.
    (b) Report.--Not later than six months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Senate a report on the progress of the Secretary in carrying out the 
requirements of subsection (f) of section 1097 of title 10, United 
States Code, as added by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.6

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEER**

 

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating (i) a portion of Cenovus Energy Inc. oil and gas reserves data, including estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2011, estimated using forecast prices and costs, and (ii) the contingent resources and prospective resources of Cenovus Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2011, estimated using forecast prices and costs, and the information derived from our reports,  as described or incorporated by reference in Cenovus Energy Inc.’s annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and Cenovus Energy Inc.’s registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-163397), Form F-3 (File No. 333-166419), and Form F-9 (File No. 333-167876), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.

 

 

 

MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.

 
| /s/   P.A. Welch                    |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| P.A.   Welch, P. Eng.               |
| President   & Managing Director |

 

Calgary, Alberta

February 22, 2012

 

14

----
Exhibit (j)(1)

  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the references to our firm under the caption "Financial
Highlights" in the DWS LifeCompass Protect 2017 Fund Prospectuses and
"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and "Financial Statements" in
the DWS LifeCompass Protect 2017 Fund Statements of Additional Information and
to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment Number 55 to the
Registration Statement (Form N-1A, No. 33-30876) of our report dated June 22,
2009, on the financial statements and financial highlights included in the DWS
LifeCompass Protect 2017 Fund Annual Report dated April 30, 2009.

                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
August 26, 2009
#### Herman DUKE (Alias, Jack Duke) v. STATE.

No. 38292.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So.2d 756.
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES
                       OF EACH OF THE LISTED PORTFOLIOS:

                                 -----------------

                              Cash Account Trust:
                    Government & Agency Securities Portfolio

                             Investors Cash Trust:
                               Treasury Portfolio

The portfolio has no intention to invest in other money market mutual funds.
Therefore, all references to the portfolio's investment policy permitting up to
10% of its portfolio assets in other money market funds are hereby deleted.










               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference


September 15, 2009
MONEY-3607
<PAGE>

Supplement to the currently effective Statements of Additional Information of
each of the listed Portfolios:

Cash Account Trust                                   Investors Cash Trust
    Government and Agency Securities Portfolio           Treasury Portfolio


The Portfolio has no intention to invest in non-affiliated money market mutual
funds. Therefore, all references to the Portfolio's non-fundamental investment
policy permitting up to 10% of its portfolio assets in non-affiliated money
market mutual funds are hereby deleted.







               Please Retain this Supplement for Future Reference



September 15, 2009
J. S67031/14 

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

 : PENNSYLVANIA 

Appellee : 

: 

 v. : 

 : 

 : 

RAYMOND CHARLES WHITE, : 

 : 

 Appellant : No. 655 WDA 2014 

Appeal from the PCRA Order February 24, 2014 

In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County 

Criminal Division No(s).: CP-02-CR-0013548-2000 

BEFORE: DONOHUE, MUNDY, and FITZGERALD,* JJ. 

MEMORANDUM BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED MARCH 05, 2015 

This matter returns to us after this panel, on January 7, 2015,1

remanded to determine the status of appointed counsel, Patrick K. 

Nightingale, Esq., in light of the petition to withdraw from representation he 

filed in the PCRA court pursuant to Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d 

927 (Pa. 1988), and Commonwealth v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 

 

*

 Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court. 

1 Commonwealth v. White, 655 WDA 2014 (unpublished memorandum at 

7) (Pa. Super. Jan. 7, 2015). 

We note this is the third time this Court has addressed the matter of 

appointed counsel’s status with respect to Appellant’s second petition filed 

under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. See id.; 

Commonwealth v. White, 910 WDA 2012 (unpublished memorandum at 

2) (Pa. Super. Jan. 28, 2013). 
J. S67031/14 

- 2 -

1988) (en banc). The PCRA court has supplemented the record with an 

order dated and entered January 20, 2015, stating Attorney Nightingales’ 

petition to withdraw “is hereby GRANTED.” Order 1/20/15. 

However, the PCRA court’s January 20, 2015 order was entered after 

Appellant perfected the underlying appeal and while this Court retained 

jurisdiction for the determination of Attorney Nightingale’s status in the 

appeal. See White, 655 WDA 2014 at 7-8. Moreover, there is no indication 

in the supplemental record that Attorney Nightingale was granted leave to 

withdraw before this appeal. Accordingly, we consider the January 20, 2015 

order to be a nullity and strike it as such. 

Because Attorney Nightingale was not properly permitted to withdraw, 

we remand for a Grazier hearing, which shall be held within thirty days of

this memorandum. If Appellant elects to proceed pro se in this appeal, the 

PCRA court shall supplement the record with its colloquy and Appellant’s 

waiver of the assistance of counsel. If Appellant elects to proceed with 

counsel, Attorney Nightingale shall, within sixty days of Appellant’s decision, 

file an advocate’s brief or seek withdrawal in this Court by filing a petition to 

withdraw and an accompanying Turner/Finley no-merit letter addressing 

whether Appellant’s instant second petition was timely filed and any issues 

Appellant intends to raise on appeal.2

 

2

 The Commonwealth may file an amended or supplemental brief if Attorney 

Nightingale proceeds as counsel in this appeal. 
J. S67031/14 

- 3 -

Case remanded. Order of January 20, 2015, stricken. Panel 

jurisdiction retained.
### No. 01

- 15

- 00823

- CR

Juan J. Martinez
, Appellant,

v.

State of Texas
, Appellee. § § § § § § § § I N THE 

### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS 

### ,

FOR THE



### F IRST 

### J UDICIAL 

### D ISTRICT 

### , H OUSTON 

### , T EXAS



### MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

Appellant, Juan J. Martinez , seeks an extension of time to file his brief in this appeal
and in support would show the Court:
Appellant timely perfected appeal from the August 20, 2015 judgment and sentence
of the trial court. The record was complete on November 17, 2 015, making appellant’s

brief due December 17, 2015.
Appellant seeks an extension of 45 days to file his brief, making the brief due
February 1, 2016. Appellant needs additional time to file his brief because counsel for
Appellant has been unable to obtain a complete copy of the record.
Following the filing of the clerk ’ s record on September 29, 2015, counsel requested
a copy of the record and was told it would be provided together with the r eporter ’ s record
when filed. The rep orter ’ s record was fi led November 17, 2015. Coun s el for Appellant
requested the record on November 24, 2015, and was informed by the trial court clerk it
would be provided by electronic mail. On November 30, 2015, counsel was in Grimes
County and picked up a disc with the record. Examination of the disc revealed it only
contained the reporter ’ s record and did not include two videos admitted in evidence, ACCEPTED 01-15-00823-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/15/2015 8:39:18 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKexhibits 12 or 13. The record contained the notation the original exhibits had been delivered

to this court at the direction of the trial court.
Additional efforts to obtain a complete record included counsel traveling to Grimes
County on December 14, 2015, t o obtain a printed copy of the clerk ’ s record . The
prosecuting attorney provided a copy of exhibit 12 but e xhibit 13 was not available at that

time.

Counsel ’ s obligation to review the record necessarily requires access to a copy of

the r ecord on appeal. Diligent efforts to obtain the record have not been completely
successful and with three days before Appellant ’ s brief is due, counsel has just obtained

the clerk ’ s record and is still attempting to secure access to State ’ s ex hibit 13. Appellant
requests an extension of 45 days to ensure access to, and an opportunity to review, the
complete record.
Appellant has requested no previous extensions.
Prayer
For the reasons set out herein, appellant prays the Court grant an extension to file
his brief until February 1, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

__ /s/

__ Clint Sare

________ Clint F. Sare Tex. Bar No. 00788354 P.O. Box 1694 Bryan , Texas 778 06 (979) 822

- 1505
Attorney for appellant Juan J. MartinezCertificate of Service
I certify a copy of appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Brief was served on Tuck McClain
, P.O. Box 599
, Anderson
, by fax on December 14, 2015.

__ /s/

_ Clint Sare

_____________ Clint F. Sare
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Billy Keith Basye, Appellant

No. 06-18-00060-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR 16-

25832). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Moseley,* Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Burgess participating. *Justice 

Moseley, Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Billy Keith Basye, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 14, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
January 10, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RSL FUNDING LLC AND RAPID SETTLEMENTS, LTD, Appellant

NO. 14-10-00902-CV V.

SETTLEMENT FUNDING, LLC D/B/A PEACHTREE SETTLEMENT FUNDING, 

Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, SETTLEMENT 

FUNDING, LLC D/B/A PEACHTREE SETTLEMENT FUNDING, signed August 24, 

2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find 

error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED

and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We order appellee, SETTLEMENT FUNDING, LLC D/B/A PEACHTREE 

SETTLEMENT FUNDING, , to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order 

this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3577 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3577

To designate the Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd Street in North 
 Platte, Nebraska, as the ``Virginia Smith Federal Building'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 11, 2024

 Mr. Ricketts (for himself and Mrs. Fischer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd Street in North 
 Platte, Nebraska, as the ``Virginia Smith Federal Building'', and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VIRGINIA SMITH FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 300 E. 3rd Street 
in North Platte, Nebraska, shall be known and designated as the 
``Virginia Smith Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Virginia Smith Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
AIPT-0108
AIPT-0109
AIPT-0110
AIPT-0111
AIPT-0112
AIPT-0113
AIPT-0114
AIPT-0115
AIPT-0116
AIPT-0117
AIPT-0118
AIPT-0119
AIPT-0120
AIPT-0121
AIPT-0122
AIPT-0123
AIPT-0124
AIPT-0125
AIPT-0126
AIPT-0127
AIPT-0128
AIPT-0129
AIPT-0130
AIPT-0131
AIPT-0132
AIPT-0133
AIPT-0134
AIPT-0135
AIPT-0136
AIPT-0137
AIPT-0138
AIPT-0139
AIPT-0140
AIPT-0141
AIPT-0142
AIPT-0143
AIPT-0144
AIPT-0145
AIPT-0146
AIPT-0147
AIPT-0148
AIPT-0149
AIPT-0150
AIPT-0151
AIPT-0152
AIPT-0153
AIPT-0154
AIPT-0155
AIPT-0156
AIPT-0157
AIPT-0158
AIPT-0159
AIPT-0160
AIPT-0161
AIPT-0162
AIPT-0163
AIPT-0164
AIPT-0165
AIPT-0166
AIPT-0167
AIPT-0168
AIPT-0169
AIPT-0170
AIPT-0171
AIPT-0172
AIPT-0173

AIPT-0175
AIPT-0176
AIPT-0177
AIPT-0178

AIPT-0180
AIPT-0181

AIPT-0183
AIPT-0184

AIPT-0186
AIPT-0187
AIPT-0188
AIPT-0189
AIPT-0190

AIPT-0192
AIPT-0193

AIPT-0195
AIPT-0196

AIPT-0198
AIPT-0199

AIPT-0201
AIPT-0202
AIPT-0203
AIPT-0204
AIPT-0205
AIPT-0206
AIPT-0207
AIPT-0208
AIPT-0209
AIPT-0210
AIPT-0211
AIPT-0212
AIPT-0213
AIPT-0214
AIPT-0215
AIPT-0216
AIPT-0217
AIPT-0218
AIPT-0219
AIPT-0220
AIPT-0221
AIPT-0222
AIPT-0223
AIPT-0224
AIPT-0225
AIPT-0226
AIPT-0227
AIPT-0228
AIPT-0229
AIPT-0230
AIPT-0231
AIPT-0232
AIPT-0233
AIPT-0234
AIPT-0235
AIPT-0236
AIPT-0237
AIPT-0238
AIPT-0239
AIPT-0240
AIPT-0241
AIPT-0242
AIPT-0243
AIPT-0244
AIPT-0245
AIPT-0246
AIPT-0247
AIPT-0248
AIPT-0249
AIPT-0250
AIPT-0251
AIPT-0252
AIPT-0253
AIPT-0254
AIPT-0255
AIPT-0256
AIPT-0257
AIPT-0258
AIPT-0259
AIPT-0260
AIPT-0261
AIPT-0262
AIPT-0263
AIPT-0264
AIPT-0265
AIPT-0266
AIPT-0267
AIPT-0268
AIPT-0269
AIPT-0270
AIPT-0271
AIPT-0272
AIPT-0273
AIPT-0274
AIPT-0275
AIPT-0276
AIPT-0277
AIPT-0278
AIPT-0279
AIPT-0280
AIPT-0281


AIPT-0284
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10053

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTIAN ALFONSO QUINTANILLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-63-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Christian Alfonso

Quintanilla raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
#### FOWLER LEASING CORPORATION, a Foreign corporation, Appellant, v. FLORIDA AIRMOTIVE SALES, INC., a Florida corporation, and Turbo-Mod, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30468]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 21 November 1997.
    Time of Meeting: 1200-1600.
    Place: Building 1109B, Fort Knox, Kentucky.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board (ASB) Issue Group Study on ``Army 
After Next'' will meet for briefings and discussions of 
survivability, mobility and lethality issues relevant to the study 
subject. These meetings will be open to the public. Any interested 
person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the 
committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee. 
For further information, please call our office at (703) 695-0781.
Wayne Joyner,
Program Support Specialist, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 97-30468 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M