alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**EXHIBIT      32.6**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Thomas G. Sategna    |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Thomas                G. Sategna        |
|                                |   | Vice                President,          |
|                                |   | Controller                and Treasurer |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61719-61720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-224, RM-9177]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Monroe, UT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Charles D. Hall requesting the allotment of Channel 257C2 to Monroe, 
Utah, as the community's first local aural transmission service. 
Channel 257C2 can be allotted to Monroe in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) south in order to avoid a 
short-spacing conflict with vacant Channel 256A at Levan, Utah. The 
coordinates for Channel 257C2 at Monroe are 38-37-21 NL and 112-07-29 
WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before December 22, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before January 6, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: James 
K. Edmundson, Gardner, Carton & Douglas, 1301 K Street, NW., Suite 900, 
East Tower, Washington, DC 20005 (Counsel for petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-224, adopted October 
22, 1997, and released October 31, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., 
(202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in

[[Page 61720]]

Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel 
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex 
parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-30285 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59872-59873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29205]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
Health Care Industry's Ad Hoc Work Group on Respect and 
Nondiscrimination; Notice of Public Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
Health Care

[[Page 59873]]

Industry's Ad Hoc Work Group on Respect and Nondiscrimination. This 
meeting will be open to the public, limited only by the space 
available.

    Place of meeting: Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 800; 200 
Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20201.
    Time and Dates: 10:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m., Monday, November 3, 1997.
    Purpose/Agenda: To discuss issues related to a draft Consumer 
Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. Agenda items are subject to 
change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person: For more information, including substantive 
program information and summaries of the meeting, please contact: 
Edward (Chip) Malin, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 118F, 200 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20201; [202/205-3038].

    Dated: October 29, 1997.
Janet Corrigan,
Executive Director, Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and 
Quality in the Health Care Industry.
[FR Doc. 97-29205 Filed 10-31-97; 10:05 am]
BILLING CODE 4110-60-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30647]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Concession Contract Negotiations: Gateway National Recreation 
Area; Staten Island, Fort Wadsworth

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a concession contract authorizing food service, and 
conference center facilities and services for the public at Fort 
Wadsworth within the Staten Island Unit of Gateway National Recreation 
Area for a period of ten (10) years from date of contract execution.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 20, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties should contact National Park Service, 
Boston Support Office, Concession Management Program, 15 State Street, 
Boston, MA 02109-3572 ATTN: Lynne Koser, Telephone (617) 223-5209, to 
obtain a copy of the prospectus describing the requirements of the 
proposed contract.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This contract has been determined to be 
categorically excluded from the procedural provisions of the National 
Environmental Policy Act and no environmental document will be 
prepared.
    There is no existing concessioner. The Secretary will consider and 
evaluate all proposals received as a result of this notice. Any 
proposal must be received by the National Park Service, Boston Support 
Office, Concession Management Program, 15 State Street, Boston, 
Massachusetts 02109-3572, not later than the sixtieth (60th) day 
following publication of this notice to be considered and evaluated.

    Dated: November 3, 1997.
Chrysandra L. Walter,
Acting Field Director, Northeast Field Area.
[FR Doc. 97-30647 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
#### Douglas Dwight COON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 41703.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 18, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1972.

Keith J. Kinderman, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree without recommendation of mercy in the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida. Subsequently, under authority of Furman v. Georgia,1 the Supreme Court of Florida in Anderson et al. v. State,2 reduced the appellant’s sentence from death to life imprisonment. After argument, and upon careful consideration of the record and briefs in this case, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, the conviction, as previously modified by reduction of sentence, is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J„ ERVIN, CARLTON, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., and WIGGIN-TON, District Court Judge, concur.

1

. 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (Opinion filed July 17, 1972).

2

. 267 So.2d 8 (Opinion filed September 8, 1972).
#### Claude Lee CURRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-793.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian and William L. Rogers, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant pleaded guilty to two separate informations charging sale and possession of narcotic drugs. He was sentenced to one year in the Dade County Jail upon the first information and to probation for five years on the second. Thereafter, the public defender filed a petition for habeas corpus in this court. The petition alleged that because of “confusion” caused by the withdrawal of appellant’s private attorney and the appointment of the public defender, a notice of appeal was not filed even though the appellant had expressed his desire to enter a notice of appeal. This court proceeded with an appeal pursuant to the authority of Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla. 1969, 229 So.2d 239.

The appellant contends that the record shows that the court erred in accepting his guilty pleas because he was not adequately informed of his constitutional rights. A review of the record demonstrates that a complete and thorough inquiry was made by *13the trial judge and that appellant entered his pleas after the opportunity for consultation with his attorney. See Garcia v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 300. Cf. United States v. Frontero, 452 F.2d 406 (5th Cir.1971).

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Clinical Research.
    Date: December 3, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: National Eye Institute, Executive Plaza South, Suite 350, 
6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7164.
    Contact Person: Andrew P. Mariani, Ph.D., Executive Plaza South, 
Room 350, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7164, (301) 496-
5561.
    Purpose/Agenda: Review of Grant Applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.867, Vision 
Research: National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: November 17, 1997.
LaVeen Ponds,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-30932 Filed 11-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         776,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,107,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 35,046,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,503,572
<PP&E>                                      41,838,630
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,449,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,143,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,734,292
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       747,541
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,546,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,143,101
<SALES>                                     49,713,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,713,255
<CGS>                                       42,630,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,809,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (60,665)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             405,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,558,261
<INCOME-TAX>                                   555,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,003,261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,003,261
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
#### James A. WILSON, Appellant, v. Lola Virginia WILSON, Appellee.

No. 71-316.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 27, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-60111

Summary Calendar

GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; WALTER INVESTMENT 

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; 

MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST 

III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; 

MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TRUST IX; 

MID STATE TRUST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST 

COMPANY; MID-STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2004-1 TRUST; MIDSTATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2005-1 TRUST; MID-STATE CAPITAL 

CORPORATION 2006-1 TRUST; MID-STATE CAPITAL TRUST 2010-1, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees

v.

ALICIA FLOYD; WILLIAM FLOYD, 

 Defendants - Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-60111 Document: 00514263465 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2017
No. 17-60111

2

PER CURIAM:*

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction based upon binding 

precedent in a virtually identical case. Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Anthony 

Charles, 872 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 2017).

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 17-60111 Document: 00514263465 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2017
|            
|------------
|            
|EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Hydroelectric Corporation
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Kuhns, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                     |     |                               
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2012 |     |                               
|                     |     |                               
|                     | By: | /s/ JOHN D. KUHNS             
|                     |     |                               
|                     |     | Name: John D. Kuhns           
|                     |     | Title: Chief Executive Officer

---
#### Robert Michael SYROTCHEN v. J. Frank ADAMS, State Attorney, Jackson County.

No. 38441.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 8-K 


 


Exhibit 10.4


 


AFFIRMATION
OF GUARANTEE


 


This
AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTEE is made as of January 16, 2018 (“Affirmation”), by the undersigned guarantor (“Guarantor”)
for the benefit of AVIDBANK (“Bank”).


RECITALS


Lightpath
Technologies, Inc. and ISP Optics Corporation (together, “Borrower”) and Bank are parties to that certain Second Amended
and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 21, 2016 and as amended from time to time (the “Agreement”).
In connection therewith, Guarantor executed for the benefit of Bank an Unconditional Guaranty dated as of September 30, 2013 (the
“Guarantee”). Borrower and Bank propose to enter into an amendment of the Agreement on or around date herewith (the
“Amendment”) to, among other things, increase and extend the credit facilities being provided by Bank to Borrower
thereunder, provided, that Guarantor consents to the Amendment and agrees that the Guarantee will remain effective.


AGREEMENT


NOW,
THEREFORE, Guarantor agrees as follows:


1.           Guarantor consents to the execution, delivery and performance by Borrower of the Amendment and the documents and instruments
executed in connection therewith.


2.           Guarantor confirms that, as of the date hereof, Guarantor has no defenses against its obligations under the Guarantee.


3.           The Guarantee is and shall remain in full force and effect with respect to Borrower’s Obligations and otherwise and
hereby is ratified and confirmed in all respects.


4.           Unless otherwise defined, all capitalized terms in this Affirmation shall be as defined in the Guarantee.


5.           In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format
data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature
is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or “.pdf” signature page were an original hereof.


[signature
page follows]






     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Affirmation of Guaranty as of the first date above written. 





	 	GUARANTOR:
	 	 	 
	 	GELTECH INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    J. James Gaynor	 
	 	 	 
	 	Name:	J. James
    Gaynor	 
	 	 	 
	 	Title :	President
    & CEO
#### Harry SWAGEL and Phyllis Frankman Swagel, his wife, Appellants, v. Mitchell C. RAPPAPORT et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Cornelia PAQUAY, Appellee.

No. 73-201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 14, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Bio Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June  30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
      hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      August 8, 2007


By:
            /s/
                David KoosDavid
                KoosActing
                Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bio
      Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.  and will be retained by Bio Matrix
      Scientific Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.