alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 24-97]

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings and oral hearings for the transaction of Commission business 
and other matters specified, as follows:
    Date and Time: Monday, November 24, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Subject Matter: (1) Oral Hearings and Hearings on the Record on 
Objections to Individual Proposed Decisions on Claims of Holocaust 
Survivors Against Germany; (2) Issuance of Individual Final Decisions 
on Claims of Holocaust Survivors Against Germany.
    Status: Closed.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claim Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6988.

    Dated at Washington DC, November 7, 1997.
Judith H. Lock,
Administrative Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-29862 Filed 11-7-97; 12:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
#### L. A. HORSTED, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Adult Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-214.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 11, 1970.

L. A. Horsted, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for respondent.

MANN, Judge.

Horsted seeks appellate review of the sufficiency of evidence underlying his conviction. He claims that his appointed counsel failed to file a motion for a new trial and that he was deprived of due process because insufficiency is not arguable on appeal unless the motion has been timely made for a new trial. State v. Wright, Fla.1969, 224 So.2d 300. But he does not allege that the evidence is even arguably insufficient.

We are confronted with the problem of extending or confining the doctrine of Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239. We do not think *Baggett*requires us to grant relief here.

Petition denied.

HOBSON, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the “Periodic Report”), I,John J. Cassese, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2002 | /s/   John J. Cassese |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                    | John J. Cassese            |
|                    | President                  |

 

 

1

----
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Dan CAMPBELL, d/b/a Campbell Brothers Trucking Company and Francis Kennedy, Appellees, v. CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. Q-376.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 4, 1973.

George D. Gabel, Jr., of Toole, Taylor, Moseley, Gabel & Milton, Jacksonville, for appellant.

C. T. Boyd, Jr., of Boyd, Jenerette, Leemis & Staas, Jacksonville, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company was defendant below in an action arising out of a collision occurring at a railroad crossing. Appellee Campbell was the plaintiff below and driver of a tractor-trailer vehicle coming within the purview of Section 317.453, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., (now repealed). Said statute requires vehicles of the type which was here involved to stop before crossing in order to ascertain whether a railroad train is approaching.

At the trial appellant-defendant requested a jury instruction based on the cited statute. The trial court denied the requested instruction and the jury brought in a verdict in favor, of the appellee-plaintiffs.

The primary issue raised on this appeal rests on the claim that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to instruct the jury on the cited statute as requested. Appellee contends that failure to give the requested instruction could not be the basis for the reversal of the judgment appealed for the reason, inter alia, that the statute relied on as basis for the instruction has since been repealed. We agree.

In Ingerson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 272 So.2d 862 (Fla.App.1973), the court adhered to the rule earlier stated by the Florida Supreme Court in Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Rouse, 194 So.2d 260 (Fla.1966), wherein the court quoted the District Court’s decision as follows:

> “ ‘We recognize the general and Florida rule to be that an appellate court, in reviewing a judgment on direct appeal, *63will dispose of the case according to the law prevailing at the time of the appellate disposition, and not according to the law prevailing at the time of rendition of the judgment appealed.’ ” at page 262.

Since the primary point urged for reversal in the case at bar rests upon the failure to give an instruction based on a statute which has since been repealed, the statute can hardly be said to be controlling law of this case. It follows then that failure to give appellant’s requested instruction based on the repealed statute cannot constitute reversible error.

Affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., TL, concur.
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:               |  /s/      William Pagano |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
| Name:   | William      Pagano           |   |
|              | Chief      Executive Officer  |   |
|              | Date:      May 15, 2008       |   |

----
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Juan Miguel Ríos Gutiérrez, President, Chief
Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Natures Call Brands Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
      year ended November 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                  



|Dated: February 25, 2011 | By: /s/ Juan Miguel Ríos Gutiérrez     
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|                         | Juan Miguel Ríos Gutiérrez             
|                         | President, Chief Executive Officer,    
|                         | Secretary, Treasurer and Director      
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
|                         | Financial Officer and Principal        
|                         | Accounting Officer)                    





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Natures Call
Brands Inc. and will be retained by Natures Call Brands Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1912 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify the treatment of 

certain institutional financial assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify 

the treatment of certain institutional financial assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep College Students 

5 Learning Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN INSTITUTIONAL FINAN7 CIAL ASSISTANCE. 

8 Part C of title I of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

9 (20 U.S.C. 1015 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1912 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 138. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN INSTITUTIONAL FINAN2 CIAL ASSISTANCE. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A covered institution of higher 

4 education shall ensure that a student who has received in5 stitutional financial assistance from such institution may 

6 use such assistance for enrollment at such institution 

7 without regard to whether, during the COVID-19 pan8 demic, the student delays such enrollment or takes a leave 

9 of absence from such institution for up to one academic 

10 year. 

11 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

12 ‘‘(1) COVERED INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDU13 CATION.—The term ‘covered institution of higher 

14 education’ means an institution of higher education 

15 (as defined in section 102) that— 

16 ‘‘(A) receives funds under this Act; and 

17 ‘‘(B) offers in-person instruction at levels 

18 less than the first semester (or the equivalent) 

19 of academic year 2019–2020. 

20 ‘‘(2) STUDENT.—The term ‘student’ includes a 

21 prospective student.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
16 September 2014

Larry McDonald

Air Transportation Division/National

Simulator Program Branch, AFS

- 205

Federal Aviation Administration

P.O. Box 20636

Atlanta, GA 30320

Ref: Flight Simulation Training Device Qualification Standards for Extended E nvelope and Adverse

Weather Event Training Tasks Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comment Period Extension

Alaska Airlines , respectfully requests that the Federal Aviation Administration grant an extension to the

comment period for the Flight Simulation Tra ining Device Qualification Standards for Extended Envelope

and Adverse Weather Event Training Tasks Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on July 10, 2014.

The proposed document consists of 293 pages, including Appendix A and Appendix B QPS requirements

. The proposal includes cost and time estimates that Alaska Airlines need s to analyz e based on information

from internal sources such as training program requirements and external sources for data availability and

implementation. In addition we need to car ry out a thorough review of the proposed Appendix A and

Appendix B QPS requirement changes. Alaska Airlines request s that the comment period be extended by 90

days

.

Sincerely,

Nigel Sargent

Director, Flight Simulator Operations

Cc: Douglas Burton

A ny safety

- related, security

- related and/or commercial information in this document is considered proprietary and is exempt from disclosure under the

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) pursuant to applicable law, including 49 U.S.C. 40123, 14 CFR 193, 49 CFR 7.17. and 15 USC 552(b)(4). This document is

released to the Federal Aviation Administration with an expectation of confidential treatment.

F orm: NPRM Extension Page 1 of 1

Rev. A1 9/17/2014
#### William Thomas MARKEY and Dock & Marine Construction, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. JAE SAM LEE, individually and as dependent mother of Kim Myung Jun, Deceased, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kim Myung Jun, Deceased, Respondent.

No. 69-205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

July 9, 1969.

James M. McEwen, of Gibbons, Tucker, McEwen, Smith & Cofer, Tampa, for William Thomas Markey.

Herboth S. Ryder, of Albritton, Sessums & Ryder, Tampa, for Dock & Marine Construction, Inc.

Brendan P. O’Sullivan, of Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The statute of limitations having run on offenses arising out of the accident in which the plaintiff was injured, the Circuit Judge properly declined to enter an order protecting Markey against testifying on deposition on the ground that he might incriminate himself. See Mead v. State, Fla.1958, 101 So.2d 373.

Certiorari denied.

LILES, A. C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos Pizza, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 13, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry J. Silverman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Harry J. SilvermanHarry J. SilvermanChief Financial Officer




Dated: July 27, 2004



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Dominos Pizza, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos Pizza, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF STR HOLDINGS, INC.

Subsidiary

State or other
Jurisdiction of
IncorporationCal Safety Compliance Corporation

CaliforniaShuster Laboratories, Inc.

DelawareSpecialized Technology Resources Espana S.A.

SpainSpecialized Technology Resources (Florida), Inc.

FloridaSpecialized Technology Resources (Hong Kong) Limited

Hong KongSpecialized Technology Resources, Inc.

DelawareSpecialized Technology Resources (International), Inc.

DelawareSpecialized Technology Resources (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd

MalaysiaSpecialized Technology Resources (Shanghai) Ltd.

ChinaSpecialized Technology Resources (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

SingaporeSpecialized Technology Resources (Taiwan) Limited

TaiwanSpecialised Technology Resources (UK) Limited

United KingdomSTR Registrar LLC

PennsylvaniaSTR Labs Pvt Ltd.

IndiaSTR Laboratuar Hizmetleri A.S.

TurkeySTR Testing & Inspection AG

SwitzerlandSTR (VN) Company Limited

VietnamSTR Solar (Connecticut), Inc.

Delaware


---



QuickLinks
B.-icldaycrs & Allied Cr aftsmen Local ~u. 7 Pension Plan 

Checklist Item #35 

Does th~ application include a designation of JX)Wer of attorney for each authorized 

representative who will represent the plan sponsor in com1ection with the application? See 

section 7.05 and Appendix B. 

Document 35. I provides the Pension ion'~ power of attorney and designation of its 

representative. 

35.1 
7.05 Powea· of Attorney 

l)ocu men t 35.1 

Po we a· of Attorney and Declaration of Representative 

Before the U.S. Department of the Treasury 

Sec the following pages. 

35.2 
BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTSMEN 

LocAL No. 7 PENSION PLAN 

June 28,20 16 

The l lonorable Jacob J. Lew 

33 FITCH BouLEVARD 

AUSTINTOWN, OHIO 44515 

Phone: 330/270-0453 

Toll free: 800/435-2388 

U.S. Secretary of the Trca~ury 

U.S. Department of the Treasury 

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC. 20220 

Re: Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative Submincd on behalf of the 

Brickl<tyt rs & Alli ed Craftsmen Local No.7 Pension Plan 

Dear Secretary Lew: 

The Roartl of' Trustee~ of the Pension Plan submits the lilllowing applicant and 

representative inlill'mation. 

Applicant In formation: 

Name of Plan: 

J'lan Address: 

Plan ."lumber: 

EIN: 

Contact Information: 

Name: 

Title: 

Addt·ess: 

Phone: 

f ax: 

F. mail: 

Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local No.7 Pension Plan 

IJcncSys, Inc., Htmelit Ol'lice 

33 Fitch Roulevard 

Austintown, Ohio 44515 

00 1 

34-666679l! 

Douglas S. Matthews 

Plan Manager 

IJcncSys. Inc., Aen.:lil Oflice 

33 Fitch 13oulcvard 

Austintown, Ohio 44515 

(330) 270-0453, ext. 2721 

(330) 270-09 12 

dnuglas.matthews@bcncsys.com 

35.3 

,. .. ~···· 
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Exhibit






Exhibit 4(e)(iv)
AMENDMENT TO 
THE HARRIS CORPORATION MASTER TRUST


THIS AGREEMENT is made this 3rd day of May, 2010 by and between HARRIS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”), and THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, an Illinois corporation of Chicago, Illinois (the “Trustee”);


WHEREAS, the Company and the Trustee executed an amended and restated master trust agreement and declaration of trust (the “Agreement”) creating the Harris Corporation Master Trust made the 2nd day of December, 2003 and effective the 3rd day of November, 2003, (the “Trust”); 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Trustee desire to amend the Trust pursuant to Section 12.1;


NOW, THEREFORE, the sections of the Trust set forth below are amended as follows, but all other sections of the Trust shall remain in full force and effect.


		
	1.
	Section 5.2 is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end:




Notwithstanding anything in this agreement to the contrary, the Investment Committee shall have the authority to engage any person or entity to buy and sell shares of Company Stock held in the Company Stock Investment Fund, and in such case the Trustee shall not have the responsibility for such purchases and sales of Company Stock. For the avoidance of doubt, if the Investment Committee does not engage any person or entity to buy or sell shares of Company Stock, the Trustee shall buy and sell shares of Company Stock in accordance with this Sections 5.2. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Trustee have caused this Amendment to be executed and their respective corporate seals to be affixed and attested by their respective corporate officers on the day and year first written above.


HARRIS CORPORTION by the Harris Corporation Investment Committee 


By: /s/ Patrick Baumann            


Its: Assistant Treasurer            




THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY


By: /s/ Robert Draths            


Its: Senior Vice President
256 La. 1158

#### Dorothy COSTEN wife of/and Wesley W. NELSON v. HIRSCHBACH MOTOR LINE and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company.

No. 50963.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 25, 1970.

In re: Dorothy Costen, wife of/and Wesley W. Nelson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. John the Baptist. 239 So.2d 438.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
polid stid cyid year sector adjacee

NH3 17 119 2007 area 112.6467333 Sector Ammonia VOC 

NH3 17 133 2007 area 8.08962748 Point 107.29 4,205.83

NH3 17 157 2007 area 18.63203785 Area 4,327.80 8,446.05

NH3 17 163 2007 area 105.5127969 Non-road 6.56 3,031.79

NH3 17 119 2007 egu_point 0.573183459 On-road 301.72 6,976.92

NH3 17 133 2007 egu_point 0.071185322 Total 4,743.37 22,660.59

NH3 17 157 2007 egu_point 1.944045006

NH3 17 163 2007 egu_point 0.027757618

NH3 17 119 2007 marairrail 0.940973828

NH3 17 133 2007 marairrail 0.818430165

NH3 17 157 2007 marairrail 0.73938646

NH3 17 163 2007 marairrail 0.58251065

NH3 17 119 2007 MOVES 135.3380883

NH3 17 133 2007 MOVES 12.69799099

NH3 17 157 2007 MOVES 13.29538105

NH3 17 163 2007 MOVES 140.3887724

NH3 17 119 2007 nh3 1208.368037

NH3 17 133 2007 nh3 701.4725074

NH3 17 157 2007 nh3 1092.018084

NH3 17 163 2007 nh3 1081.056792

NH3 17 119 2007 nonegu_pt 81.70125566

NH3 17 133 2007 nonegu_pt 0.04904772

NH3 17 157 2007 nonegu_pt 0.811903939

NH3 17 163 2007 nonegu_pt 22.10688663

NH3 17 119 2007 nonroad 1.613182444

NH3 17 133 2007 nonroad 0.304085094

NH3 17 157 2007 nonroad 0.314038197

NH3 17 163 2007 nonroad 1.251048828 4,743.37

ROG 17 119 2007 area 3712.203914

ROG 17 133 2007 area 642.523783

ROG 17 157 2007 area 823.3925679

ROG 17 163 2007 area 3267.929503

ROG 17 119 2007 egu_point 56.28860236

ROG 17 133 2007 egu_point 0.343887993

ROG 17 157 2007 egu_point 318.3182418

ROG 17 163 2007 egu_point 0.112047641

ROG 17 119 2007 marairrail 57.74872393

ROG 17 133 2007 marairrail 49.65172908

ROG 17 157 2007 marairrail 52.00418446

ROG 17 163 2007 marairrail 57.2633079

ROG 17 119 2007 nonegu_pt 3116.771944

ROG 17 133 2007 nonegu_pt 17.19817331

ROG 17 157 2007 nonegu_pt 10.67456109

ROG 17 163 2007 nonegu_pt 686.1239259

ROG 17 119 2007 nonroad 1383.053282

ROG 17 133 2007 nonroad 182.3814416

ROG 17 157 2007 nonroad 271.5583359

ROG 17 163 2007 nonroad 978.1290901

TOG 17 119 2007 MOVES 3131.079308

TOG 17 133 2007 MOVES 282.9908964

TOG 17 157 2007 MOVES 342.0947825

TOG 17 163 2007 MOVES 3220.758075 22,660.59

Emissions in tons per year