alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1698 

To require the Secretary of Energy to establish the Nuclear Industrial Base 

Analysis and Sustainment Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. LATTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to establish the Nuclear 

Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Industrial 

5 Base Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NUCLEAR INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND 

7 SUSTAINMENT PROGRAM. 

8 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 30 days after 

9 the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of En10 ergy shall establish a nuclear industrial base analysis and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1698 IH

1 sustainment program, to be known as the Nuclear Indus2 trial Base Analysis and Sustainment Program. 

3 (b) DUTIES.—In carrying out the Nuclear Industrial 

4 Base Analysis and Sustainment Program, the Secretary 

5 shall— 

6 (1) support the monitoring and assessment of 

7 the nuclear industrial base and its urgent oper8 ational needs; 

9 (2) support efforts to expand the nuclear indus10 trial base by encouraging public-private partnerships 

11 and partnerships between individuals and entities 

12 that are developing and deploying new nuclear power 

13 assets that operate at each stage of the nuclear fuel 

14 cycle; and 

15 (3) highlight and formulate recommendations to 

16 address supply chain vulnerabilities of the nuclear 

17 industrial base. 

18 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

19 (1) PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘Program’’ means 

20 the Nuclear Industrial Base Analysis and 

21 Sustainment Program established under subsection 

22 (a). 

23 (2) NUCLEAR INDUSTRIAL BASE.—The term 

24 ‘‘nuclear industrial base’’ means the persons or or25 ganizations within the Federal Government and the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1698 IH

1 private sector that are engaged in designing, pro2 ducing, maintaining, developing, or integrating nu3 clear energy systems, components, parts, or other 

4 assets. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on October 31, 1997, a proposed Consent 
Decree in United States v. Caribe General Electric Products, Inc., and 
General Electric Company, No. 96-1366 (D.P.R.), was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.
    In this action the United States sought, pursuant to Sections 
107(a) and 113(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. Secs. 9607(a) 
and 9613(b), recovery of past costs and a declaratory judgment for 
future costs concerning the General Electric Wiring Devices Superfund 
Site, located in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico. In the proposed consent 
decree, the settling parties, Caribe General Electric Products, Inc., 
and General Electric Company, agree to pay to the United States 
$612,500.00 for past response costs and future oversight costs, to 
provide the Environmental Protection Agency with access to their 
property pursuant to a 1984 Administrative Order on Consent, and to 
covenant not to sue the United States.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the consent 
decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General 
of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of 
Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to United States v. 
Caribe General Electric Products, Inc., and General Electric Company, 
No. 96-1366 (D.P.R.), D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-1157.
    The consent decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, District of Puerto Rico, Federal Building, Room 452, 
Chardon Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918, at U.S. EPA Region II, 290 
Broadway, New York, NY 10007-1866, and at the Consent Decree Library, 
1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. 
A copy of the consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount 
of $13.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-30586 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
April
        25,
        2007
 
 The
        Board
        of Directors and Management
 Coachmen
        Industries
 2831
        Dexter Drive
 Elkhart,
        IN 46514
   Ladies
        and Gentlemen,
  Note
        1 of
        the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Coachmen
        Industries, Inc. (“Company”) included in its Form 10-Q for the period ended
        March 31, 2007 describes a change in the classification of delivery expenses
        from operating expenses to cost of sales. There are no authoritative criteria
        for determining a ‘preferable’ method of classifying delivery expenses based on
        the particular circumstances; however, we conclude that such change in
        classification is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on your
        business judgment to make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable
        in your circumstances. We have not conducted an audit in accordance with
        the
        standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
        of
        any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period
        subsequent to December 31, 2006, and therefore we do not express any opinion
        on
        any financial statements of Coachmen Industries, Inc. subsequent to that
        date.
     Very
        truly yours,
    /s/
        Ernst
& Young LLP
     Grand
        Rapids, Michigan
#### Richard Johnson BEHRENS and Dispatch Service, Inc., Appellants, v. Donald BUFKIN, Appellee.

No. 73-749.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
256 La. 769

#### STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. Lester J. ROBINSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50748.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 30, 1970.

In re: Lester J. Robinson applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ granted.

ORDER

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Earl E. Veron, Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, for the Parish of Calcasieu, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 14th day of October, 1970, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent District Attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A. M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Donald Lynn Collins certifythat:

1.       I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Collins Industries, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)                Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)                Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)                Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant'sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.       The registrant's othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)                Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| **Dated:** | **September  3, 2003** | **/s/ Donald Lynn Collins**        |
|------------|------------------------|------------------------------------|
|       |                   | **Donald Lynn Collins, President** |
|       |                   | **and Chief Executive Officer**    |

****
Exhibit 32.2

                            MEIGUO ACQUISITION CORP.
                             A Delaware Corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Meiguo   Acquisition   Corp.
("Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
W. Keaveney,  Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: March 4, 2010                       /s/  David W. Keaveney
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  David W. Keaveney
                                      Its: Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”)for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”),I, Michael J. Shea, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that thePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   Date: | May        , 2004 |                     | /s/  Michael J. Shea |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|              |                                            | Michael J.  Shea         |
|              |                                            | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                   |                                                 |                          |                           |        |  |

 

----
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1692 

To extend and expand the Wildfire Hurricane Indemnity Program to cover 

losses due to high winds, polar vortexes, and hailstorms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. JACKSON (for himself, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. BRADY, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. 

BURGESS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Ms. VAN

DUYNE, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas, Mr. BABIN, and 

Mr. FALLON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To extend and expand the Wildfire Hurricane Indemnity 

Program to cover losses due to high winds, polar 

vortexes, and hailstorms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rehabilitating Eco5 nomic Success Through Overcoming Rural Emergencies 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘RESTORE Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1692 IH

1 SEC. 2. USDA WILDFIRE HURRICANE INDEMNITY PROGRAM 

2 EXTENSION AND EXPANSION. 

3 The Secretary of Agriculture shall make payments 

4 for necessary expenses related to losses of crops (including 

5 losses due to high winds or derechos, polar vortexes (in6 cluding losses to dairy cooperatives due to power outages 

7 or curtailments), hailstorms, freeze, and all losses eligible 

8 for assistance under subpart O of part 760 of title 7, Code 

9 of Federal Regulations, including any drought losses in 

10 2020 and 2021, notwithstanding the limitations of section 

11 791(b) of title VII of division B of the Further Consoli12 dated Appropriations Act, 2020) pursuant to title I of the 

13 Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Re14 lief Act, 2019 (Public Law 116–20), as amended by sec15 tion 116 of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2020 

16 (Public Law 116–59) and as further amended by sub17 section (c) of section 791 of the Further Consolidated Ap18 propriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 116–94) for crop 

19 losses in calendar year 2020 and calendar year 2021, ex20 cept that payments for losses incurred in 2020 and 2021 

21 shall be— 

22 (1) in the case of producers, subject only to the 

23 limitations provided under section 760.1507 of title 

24 7, Code of Federal Regulations; and 

25 (2) in the case of dairy cooperatives, shall be 

26 paid in the same manner and subject to the same 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1692 IH

1 limitations as cooperative processors under section 

2 791(c) of title VII of division B of the Further Con3 solidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 

4 116–94). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSES ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellant, v. Vance SCHWARTZ, Chairman, et al., constituting the Board of Commissioners of Halifax District Hospital, Appellees.

No. Q-62.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 19, 1974.

John P. Harllee, III, Harrison, Johnston, Harllee & Porges, Bradenton, for appellant.

William E. Sizemore, Shackleford, Far-rior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

By order dated February 12, 1973, this cause was continued until the adjournment of the 1973 Legislature. We anticipated that the 1973 Legislature, pursuant to the Florida Supreme Court’s mandate in Dade County Class. Teach. Ass’n, Inc. v. Legislature, 269 So.2d 684 (Fla.1972), would fulfill the constitutional requirements of Article I, Section 6 of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The 1973 Legislature adjourned without fulfilling this responsibility. The Supreme Court of the State of Florida is currently in the process of promulgating guidelines to fulfill the constitutional mandate of Article I, Section 6, as it refers to collective bargaining.

Counsel for appellee has graciously, in fulfilling his responsibility to promote justice, brought to our attention the recent Florida Supreme Court decision in Cannery, C.D., W. & A. Emp. v. Winter Haven Hosp., Inc., 279 So.2d 23 (Fla.1973). The Florida Supreme Court in Cannery, supra, held that the union has standing to represent its members in collective bargaining negotiations. This decision disposes of the sole issue which is pending before this Court in the instant cause, i. e., the appellant-union’s standing to represent, promote *92and defend the interests of its members in negotiations with appellee.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed is reversed.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobilized Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on the Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Day, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Controller and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)        the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)       The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.





Mobilized Entertainment, Inc.Date: March 30, 2012

By:

/s/ Kevin DayKevin Day

Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Controller and Director





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Docket No. FAA - 2013 - 0330
#### Norman Lee HORN et ux., Appellants, v. INDEPENDENT FIRE INS. CO., Appellee.

No. GG-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 18, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 22, 1977.

Gregory E. Tucci of Blowers, Walkup, Berk & Tucci, Ocala, for appellants.

*892Andrew G. Pattillo, Jr., of Pattillo, MacKay & McKeever, Ocala, and Harry M. Hobbs, Tampa, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

An appeal from an order of the trial court fixing fees for the services of appellants’ lawyer on the prior appeal and assessing the amount against appellee. See *Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Horn,*343 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Although the $1,500 fee awarded is surely at the bottom of the range of a reasonable fee for the services required of appellants’ lawyer on the appeal, we cannot say that it was insufficient as a matter of law.

AFFIRMED. Appellants’ motion for an allowance of additional fee money on this appeal is DENIED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Respect Your Universe, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven H. Eklund, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 19, 2012

/s/Steven H. EklundSteven H. Eklund,

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3
        
AMENDMENT 
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement by and between Sprint Corporation and Kevin Crull made and entered into as of May 31, 2015 (the “Agreement”), and as previously amended, is made and entered into January 3, 2018 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).  Certain capitalized term shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that as of the Amendment Effective Date the Executive shall be employed by the Company as the Chief Strategy Officer and the definition of “Good Reason” in Section 29(x)(iii) of the Agreement shall be amended as of the Amendment Effective Date as follows, with the only change being to replace “December 31, 2017” with “April 30, 2018”:


(iii)    the Executive is not, before July 1, 2016, appointed to an expanded role, as mutually agreed by the Executive and the Chief Executive Officer at that time, and the executive resigns effective as of a date in the period from July 1, 2016 through April 30, 2018; or


In all other respects, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall remain the same.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by an officer pursuant to the authority of its Board, and the Executive has executed this Amendment, effective as of the day and year first written above.




SPRINT CORPORATION




/s/ Ismat Aziz                        
By:  Ismat Aziz, Chief Human Resources Officer
                        


EXECUTIVE




/s/ Kevin Crull                        
By: Kevin Crull