5826 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 1997 / Notices

1421. Published FR 12–13–96—

Review Period extended.

EIS No. 960596, Draft EIS, NPS, AS,

National Park of American Samoa,

Implementation, General Management

Plan, Islands of Tutulla, Ta’u and Ofu,

Territory of American Samoa, Due:

February 18, 1997, Contact: Alan

Schmierer (415) 744–3968. Published

FR 01–03–97 Correction to Telephone

Number.

EIS No. 970015, Final EIS, COE, VA,

Lower Virginia Peninsula Regional

Raw Water Supply Plan, Permit

Approval, Cohoke Mill Creek, King

William County, VA, Due: March 26,

1997, Contact: Pamela K. Painter (757)

441–7654. Published FR 12–13–96—

Review Period Extended.

Dated: February 4, 1997.

William D. Dickerson,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 97–3092 Filed 2–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE: 6560–50–U

[ER–FRL–5477–3]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared January 20, 1997 through

January 24, 1997 pursuant to the

Environmental Review Process (ERP),

under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act

and Section 102(2)(c) of the National

Environmental Policy Act as amended.

Requests for copies of EPA comments

can be directed to the OFFICE OF

FEDERAL ACTIVITIES at (202) 564–

7167. An explanation of the ratings

assigned to draft environmental impact

statements (EISs) was published in FR

dated April 05, 1996 (61 FR 15251).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–AFS–K65190–AZ Rating

EC2, Eastern Roosevelt Lake Watershed

Analysis Area Grazing Strategy and

Associated Range Improvements

Management Plan, Development and

Implementation, Tonto National Forest,

Tonto Basin Ranger District, Gila

County, AZ.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concern regarding

potential air and water quality impacts

and cumulative impacts. EPA requested

that these issues be clarified in the FEIS.

ERP No. D–AFS–L65276–ID Rating

EC2, Prince John Timber Sale Project,

Implementation, Boise National Forest,

Cascade Ranger District, Valley County,

ID.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns about water

quality impacts and requested that the

FEIS discuss alternatives that do not

enter roadless areas.

ERP No. D–AFS–L82015–ID Rating

EC2, St. Joe Noxious Weed Control

Project, Implementation, St. Maries

River, St. Joe River and Little North Fork

Clearwater River, Benewah, Shoshone

and Latah Counties, ID.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concern regarding

potential misuse and over-application of

herbicides. EPA requested that the

alternative analysis be expanded.

ERP No. D–BLM–J01075–WY Rating

EC2, North Rochelle Mine, Application

for Federal Coal Lease (WYW127221),

Special-Use-Permits and NPDES Permit,

Campbell County, WY.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns related to the

need for additional information, data

and discussion of air quality impacts.

Additional information is requested in

the FEIS to address theses concerns.

ERP No. D–BLM–J60018–UT Rating

EO2, Price Coalbed Methane Gas

Resources Project, Construction, Federal

and Non-Federal Lands, Permit-to-Drill

Application, Right-of-Way Grants and

COE Section 404 Permits, Carbon and

Emery Counties, UT.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental objection to the proposed

action due to potential air quality, water

quality (including groundwater and

wetlands) impacts and the lack of

adequate habitat preservation and

protection measures. EPA requested that

the above issues be clarified in the FEIS.

ERP No. D–DOE–K08052–00 Rating

EC2, Navajo Transmission Project

(NTP), Construction, Operation and

Maintenance, Right-of-Way Grants, EPA

NPDES, COE, FAA, FWS and FHW

Permits Issuance, NV, NM and AZ.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

potential wetland impacts, pollution

prevention issues and Native American

sacred sites. EPA requested that the

FEIS clarify these issues.

ERP No. D–DOE–L09812–WA Rating

EO2, Hanford Remedial Action,

Implementation, Comprehensive LandUse Plan, Hanford Site lies in the Pasco

Basin of the Columbia Plateau, WA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental objections particularly

with regard to contaminated soil issues,

inconsistent risk assessments,

inaccurate cost information and the

failure to properly describe the

relationship between agreements

reached under CERCLA and RCRA and

those described in the NEPA process.

EPA requested that these and other

issues be fully clarified in the FEIS.

ERP No. D–FAA–K51037–CA Rating

EO2, Metropolitan Oakland

International Airport (MOIA), Airport

Development Program (ADP), Airport

Layout Plan Approval, Funding and

COE Section 404 and 10 Permits

Issuance, Port of Oakland, Alameda

County, CA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental objection due to

potential inconsistency with the general

conformity (air quality), section 404

requirements (wetlands) and the lack of

a hazardous waste minimization

program. EPA requested clarification

and or mitigation of these issues.

ERP No. D–NOA–L39054–WA Rating

LO, Programmatic EIS—Commencement

Bay Restoration Plan, Implementation,

COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, CZMA

and NPDES Applications, Puget Sound,

Pierce County, WA.

Summary: EPA has no objection to the

action as proposed.

ERP No. D–NOA–L91001–AK Rating

EC2, Juneau Consolidated Facility,

Implementation, Fisheries Management

Operation, ‘‘Vision for 2005’’, Juneau,

AK.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concern regarding

potential impacts to hydrology,

wetlands, air quality and fish/wildlife

services. EPA requested that additional

clarification information be included in

the FEIS and that appropriate mitigation

be provided.

ERP No. D–NPS–L61213–00 Rating

LO, Nez Perce National Historical Park

and Big Hole National Battefield

General Management Plan,

Implementation, Asotin and Okanogan

Counties, WA; Wallowa County, OR;

Idaho, Lewis, Nez Perce, Clearwater and

Clank Counties, ID; and Blaine,

Yellowstone and Beaverhead Counties,

MT.

Summary: EPA has no objection to the

action as proposed.

ERP No. D–USN–K11075–CA Rating

EC2, Naval Medical Center Oakland,

Disposal and Reuse, Implementation, in

the City of Oakland, Alameda County,

CA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

impacts to biological resources

particularly riparian and wetland

resources and other water quality issues.

ERP No. D–USN–L11031–WA Rating

LO, Puget Sound Naval Station, Sand

Point, Disposal and Reuse,

Implementation, King County, WA.

Summary: Following EPA’s

preliminary review, EPA found no

significant statutory or jurisdictional

issues from its perspective.

ERP No. DS–FTA–K40208–CA Rating

LO, South Sacramento Corridor
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 1997 / Notices 5827

Transportation Improvements, Union

Pacific Railroad Corridor from the 16th

Street Station to Meadaview Road, New

Information concerning Alternatives

Evaluation and the Impacts Assessment

Process, Funding and US COE Permit,

City and County of Sacramento, CA.

Summary: EPA has no objection to the

action as proposed.

ERP No. DS–NOA–E64007–00 Rating

LO, Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for

the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of

Mexico, US Waters, Amendment 9

concerning Reduction of Unwanted

Bycatch of Juvenile Red Snapper with

Ancillary Benefits to Other Finfish

Species, Implementation, MXG.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the action as proposed.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–AFS–L40192–ID

Packsaddle Timber Sale and Road

Construction Project, Implementation,

Idaho Panhandle National Forests,

Sandpoint Ranger District, Bonner

County, ID.

Summary: Review of the Final EIS

was not deemed necessary. No formal

comment letter was sent to the

preparing agency.

ERP No. F–AFS–L65193–OR Paw

Timber Sale, Timber Harvest and Road

Construction, Implementation, Umpqua

National Forest, Diamond Lake Ranger

District, Douglas County, OR.

Summary: Review of the FEIS was not

deemed necessary. No formal comment

letter was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–AFS–L65201–OR Eagle

Creek Timber Sale and Road

Construction, Implementation, Mt.

Hood National Forest, Zigzag and

Estacada Ranger Districts, Clackamas

County, OR.

Summary: Review of the Final EIS

was not deemed necessary. No formal

comment letter was sent to the

preparing agency.

ERP No. F–AFS–L65241–ID Fish Bate

Timber Sale, Implementation, North

Fork Clearwater River, Clearwater

National Forest, North Fork Ranger

District, Clearwater County, ID.

Summary: Review of the FEIS was not

deemed necessary. No formal comment

letter was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–AFS–L65253–OR Trail

System and Off-Highway Vehicle

Management and Development,

Implementation, Ochoco National

Forest and Crooked River National

Grassland, Crook, Grant, Jefferson,

Harney and Wheeler Counties, OR.

Summary: Review of the FEIS was not

deemed necessary. No formal comment

letter was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–AFS–L65269–OR Augusta

Timber Sale, Implementation,

Willamette National Forest, Blue River

Ranger District, Willamette Meridian,

Blue River, Lane County, OR.

Summary: EPA previous concerns

have been resolved. Therefore EPA had

no objection to the action as proposed.

ERP No. F–FHW–L40194–WA WA–3/

WA–304 Bremerton Ferry Terminal to

the vicinity of Gorst Highway

Improvement Project, Implementation,

Funding, Right-of-Way Grant, NPDES

Permit and COE Section 404 Permit,

City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, WA.

Summary: Review of the final EIS was

not deemed necessary. No formal

comment letter was sent to the

preparing agency.

ERP No. F–FRC–K05054–NV Blue

Diamond South Pumped Storage

Hydroelectric (FERC. No. 10756)

Project, Issuance of License for

Construction, Operation and Maintain,

Right-of-Way Grant and Possible COE

Section 404 Permit, Clark County, NV.

Summary: Review of the FEIS was not

deemed necessary. No formal letter was

sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–NPS–L65229–AK Brooks

River Area Development, Use and

Management Plan, Implementation,

Katmai National Park, AK.

Summary: Review of the FEIS was not

deemed necessary. No formal comment

letter was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–SFW–L99006–WA

Washington State Department of Natural

Resources (WDNR) Habitat Conservation

Plan (HCP), Issuance of a Permit for

Incidental Take of Federally-Listed

Species and Implementation of the

Multi-Species Plan for Lands Managed

by WDNR, WA.

Summary: Review of the FEIS has

been completed and the project found to

be satisfactory. No formal comment

letter was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. FS–BIA–L35003–WA

Swinomish Marina and Support

Facilities Development, New

Information concerning Design Changes,

Approval, COE Section 10/404 Permits

and EPA NPDES Permit Issuance,

Swinomish Indian Reservation, Skagit

County, WA.

Summary: EPA commends the

cooperative efforts of the Swinomish

Tribal Community to develop an

improved environmentally acceptable

project in response to previous issues

raised. EPA has no objections to the

action as proposed.

Dated: February 4, 1997.

William D. Dickerson,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 97–3093 Filed 2–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collections Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

February 3, 1997.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection, as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarify of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on

this information collection should

submit comments April 8, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to

Dorothy Conway, Federal

Communications Commission, Room

234, 1919 M St., N.W., Washington, DC

20554 or via internet to

dconway@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collections contact Dorothy

Conway at 202–418–0217 or via internet

at dconway@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Approval Number: 3060–0407.

Title: Application for Extension of

Broadcast Construction Permit or to

Replace Expired.

Type of Review: Revision of currently

approved collection Construction

Permit.

Form Number: FCC 307.

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 700.