alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

The certification set
forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Kazuo Tanabe, Representative Director and President, and Nobuo Iwasaki, Director and Senior Managing Executive Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

i. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

ii. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sumitomo
Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc.

Date: August 30, 2011



By:

/s/ Kazuo TanabeName:

Kazuo TanabeTitle:

Representative Director and PresidentBy:

/s/ Nobuo IwasakiName:

Nobuo IwasakiTitle:

Director and Senior ManagingExecutive Officer




13.1-1
Page 37.1.542
Page 37 1.543

 

Page 37.1 545

Page 37 1.547

 

Page 37 1 549

LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT CO 

Page 37.1.551
Page 37.1.552
Page 37.1.553
Page 37.1.554



LEHMER’S 

Page 37.1.558
Page 37.1.559
Page 37.1.560
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period(s) covered in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 7, 2010 |   |   |
|-------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Richard M. Lavers   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Richard M. Lavers       |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

----

----
#### Arthur SCHOPPAUL, Appellant, v. Grace SCHOPPAUL, Appellee.

No. 77-2286.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 25, 1978.

Joseph H. Young and Sidney B. Shapiro, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Kuvin, Klingensmith & Lewis, Edgar E. Cox, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *Daughterty v. Daughterty,*308 So.2d 24 (Fla.1975); *Adams v. Adams,*340 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
**Map Collections**

----

[Rights and Reproductions]

----

**Bangladesh administrative divisions.**

United States. Central Intelligence Agency.

**CREATED/PUBLISHED** [Washington : Central Intelligence Agency, 2011]

**NOTES**"803502AI (G00535) 6-11." 

Includes location map. 

 Scale 1:3,500,000 ; Lambert conformal conic proj., standard parallels 21�40' N 21�40' N .

**SUBJECTS**Bangladesh--Administrative and political divisions--Maps.Maps.Bangladesh.

**MEDIUM**1 map : col. ; 23 x 17 cm.

**CALL NUMBER**G7646.F7 2011 .U5

**REPOSITORY**Library of Congress Geography and Map Division Washington, D.C. 20540-4650 USA 

**DIGITAL ID****g7646f****ct003448** http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/**g7646f**.**ct003448**

**PREVIOUS****NEXT****NEW SEARCH**
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|---------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:   March 9, 2011 |   | /s/ John C. Wobensmith                                                   |   |
|                            |   | Name: John C. Wobensmith                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                            |   | Title:   President and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
Circuit Court for Baltimore City

Case No. 24-C-06-009911

Argued: 3/7/14

Reargued 5/6/14

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

 No. 105

September Term, 2013

 

BEN C. CLYBURN, et al.

 v.

 QUINTON RICHMOND, et al.

 

 

Barbera, C.J. 

Harrell

Battaglia

 Greene

Adkins

McDonald

Watts,

 JJ.

 ORDER

Filed: May 28, 2014 
BEN C. CLYBURN, et al. * In the

* Court of Appeals

 v. 

* of Maryland

* No. 105

 

QUINTON RICHMOND, et al. * September Term, 2013

O R D E R

The Court having issued a temporary stay in the above entitled case until 4:30 p.m. on March

11, 2014, and thereafter extended the temporary stay to 4:30 p.m. on June 5, 2014; and, considering

that the Court, on May 27, 2014, adopted the Rules Committee’s proposal in its 183 Report (as rd

amended), which contained Rules amendments designed to implement the requirements of the

Court’s opinion in DeWolfe v. Richmond, 434 Md. 444 (2013), it is this 28 day of May 2014 th

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the temporary stay of the injunction

issued in this matter by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City on January 10, 2014 (as amended by

Order of January 13, 2014) be, and the same is hereby, extended from 4:30 p.m. on June 5, 2014,

to 7:59 a.m. on July 1, 2014; and it is further

ORDERED that the aforesaid stay and injunction shall be vacated as of 8:00 a.m. on July 1,

2014, without further order of the Court.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022767
<NAME> TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      925,955
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        213
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          14,051
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        32,755
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  22,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 995,245
<COMMON>                                           107
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      222,149
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             89,451
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 311,707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,844
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           341,223
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  100,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 240,471
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  995,245
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      190,554
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             9,620
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     153,917
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     163,537
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         27,017
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 350
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  27,367
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        10,799
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,568
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         25
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   16,543
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        25,057
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        9,107
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          65,432
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### HUSSEY MANUFACTURING CO. and Merco of Florida Corp., Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellee.

No. 73-567.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1974.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Okell, Miami, for appellants.

West, Goldman & Weisberg, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Florida Power & Light Company v. General Safety Equipment Company, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 486.
# Appendix	A
3D	Robotics	IRIS+	Checklist

Go outside to**~n** 

### open 

### ;,ore..:.!



# 3**l~c:-e** 

### I R I S**:. ~** **nch** 

### po.nL 

# 1 Pow- on contr ol l e r-: set lo S T O .:md R TL OFF
.



# 4 Press _, d hol d s;3:fecy 

### button unt . il so ..

d reeL 

# 5 Ched< 

### LEO. 

# F l i ght Chec k l ist 

# 2 Con.-..ect c b:lrged b.:.ttery.

### "'~**rnot~s.** 

### The mo-tor-$ ve ru: ..

y**~ct··~e** 

# o • o •**~-**

LE D

• • • • lnlti.ab:rlg..

### ple.new~t 

# Q
. 0
. Acqu'W"l$ GPS, plene w0111t 

# 0 • 0
. Autoc•lot r-ellody. GPS k>dted
••••

### A~d 

# Sa fety Bu tt o n 

# 0 • 0 • '-l.otors tn3Ctive. s.::ofe to "1l!r"'dle 

# F

hgh t Modes Standard pos t1on 

### (alt1:...1de no l d mode) STD f"'fmonlloo.lly 

### A:.rtomode AUTO



### Lane C>t7 -1.**~** ·e!l**~t<k** 

### do...,.••· • ¥
.. l >.J'"III**rrr.olor~ ~0**  n 

# 0
. 0
. Lo.s.s. 

### of RC

## S'8"~**~~.;torr.;:otc L~nda~**  

# 0 • 0 l)) lovor

# :o~nerv .a ...

# -to~ ic

# landu~
• • • ) )) Lo.s.s. 

### of GPS s.gn:.l, SW<tch to m.al"ll.l.!li 

# •• 0 Syster'n enor; 

### soc:

### trol.bleshoot•~gude 

# •••• Motors .::octn.-e. de.::octn.-ate before**N~hng** 

### (see reverse)

# ~ 

# 144 Lo1ter mode l T R.



### Re:...1rn to 

### launcn 

## Rn bnd 

### at l'i:'e 

### .b..ar.tch**~** 

### Con tro 

### g •mba I TI L

T

## C o n trol ler Fl i ght Da t a I Press and hold the ON button to access the flight data screens. Press ON again to toggle between screens. 

# .**~** G PS status c on nectio n s t rength 

# .. a l t i t ude i n mete rs 

# - speed i n m/s 

# .. met ers from l a unch po i nt 

# - fl i ght t i n e 

# -**LUrf~ lll** **dli .J~**  

# • current l ong i t u d e 

# .. a l t i t ude i n m e te rs 

# -

F l i ght 

# • current fl i g h t mo d e GPS s i g na l s:rength i n #o f sate ll i tes f li ght batter; l eve l ( 1 05 - 1 2 6 V) fl i ght batter; mAh consumed s i n c e arme d 

# 1.:\ End your flight at 10. 7 V. 

# L.l.::l. Do not exceed 4000 mA h f or a f u l l y charged IRIS + battery (80% of availab l e capacity)
.

- co ntro ll er battery l eve l (9- 1 2 V) 

# ® 0 ® 0 @ 0

Post f lig h t Ra i se l eft st i ck above Set l eft st i ck to ce nter Move l eft s t i ck l ef t cen ter t o take off and to m a i nta i n a l t i t ude
. a n d r i ght t o rotate
. ga in a l t i tude
.

# €1~**0**
Use r i ght st i ck t o fly forwar d , backward. l eft, and r i ght. 

# 1 Disarm

motors. 

# ® 0 2 Press safety button. 

# e o e o

Ho l d l eft st i ck dow n- Press an d h o l d unt il Lowe r l eft st i ck belo w Se t l eft st i ck fu lly down to cente r t o desc end . l a n d whe n n ear the gro u n d . 

# 3 Disconnect battery. 

# 4 Power off controller.

l eft u nt il m otors s top. b l i n k i n g red to de act i va te.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 15, 2017

p1115 

# Order

Clerk November 15, 2017

154829

DEBORAH LYNN FOSTER,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 154829

COA: 324853

Dickinson CC: 07

- 015064

- DM

RAY JAMES FOSTER,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is conside red and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Howell v

Howell , ___ US ___; 137 S Ct 400; 197 L Ed 2d 781 (2017).
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 39052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16397]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts; Proposed Collection: Comment 
Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(A)]. This program 
helps ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, 
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, 
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of 
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. 
Currently, the National Endowment for the Arts, on behalf of the 
Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities, is soliciting comments 
concerning the Application for Indemnification for Domestic 
Exhibitions. A copy of this collection request can be obtained by 
contacting the office listed below in the ADDRESSES section of this 
notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
ADDRESSES section below on or before June 3, 2008. The National 
Endowment for the Arts is particularly interested in comments which:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms 
of information technology, e.g., permitting the electronic submissions 
of responses.

ADDRESSES: Alice Whelihan, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 726, Washington, DC 20506-0001, 
telephone (202) 682-5574 (this is not a toll-free number), fax (202) 
682-5603.

Kathleen Edwards,
Director, Administrative Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-16397 Filed 7-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1325. KENYETTA STROUD v. CROSSINGS AT EAGLES LANDING,

LLC d/b/a CROSSINGS AT EAGLES LANDING.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, defendant Kenyetta Stroud appealed to the state court, which

entered a final order and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Stroud then appealed

directly to this Court. We lack jurisdiction.

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a

magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary

appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11), (b); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga.

App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals

procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257,

257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Stroud’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives

us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Strachan,

216 Ga. App. at 82.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 22, 2021

04/22/2021
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Andrew JOSEPH, Sr., and Christine Joseph, Appellees.

No. 72-368.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 17, 1972.

Marvin U. Mounts, Jr., County Solicitor, and J. Michael Burman, Asst. County Solicitor, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

R. Bruce Jones, Jr., North Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

MAGER, J., dissents, with opinion.

MAGER, Judge

(dissenting).

In my view, under the particular facts of this case, there was substantial compliance with F.S. Section 933.09, F.S.A. The narcotics paraphernalia and firearms were thus properly seized by the police officers and should not have been suppressed. Under the rationale of this court’s decisions in State v. Bell, Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 748, and State v. Clarke, Fla.App.1970, 242 So.2d 791, I would reverse and vacate the order of "the trial court and remand this cause for a trial on the merits.
**
**Exhibit 31.4**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, SusanA. Knudson, certify that: 

 
 1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pfenex Inc.; and 
 
 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 
Date: June 6, 2018 

 

/s/ Susan A. Knudson
Susan A. KnudsonChief Financial Officer(*Principal Financial Officer*)**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5916-2]


Notice of Public Meeting on Notices of Data Availability for the 
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule and Stage 1 
Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts Rule

    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) is holding two public education meetings to provide information 
related to forthcoming Notices of Data Availability on the Interim 
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (IESWTR) and Stage 1 
Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts Rule (D/DBPR) to be published in 
early November. The purpose of the meetings will be to discuss the 
content of these Notices, which includes the following: new data and 
information that the Agency has obtained and analyses that have been 
developed since the 1994 proposals of the IESWTR (59 FR 38832, July, 
1994) and Stage 1 D/DBPR (59 FR 38668, July 29, 1994); information 
concerning recommendations of the Microbial-Disinfectants/Disinfection 
Byproducts (M-DBP) Advisory Committee (chartered in February 1997 under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act) on key issues related to the 
proposal; and regulatory implications that flow from the new data and 
information. These meetings are not public hearings and EPA will not be 
accepting comments on the Notices of Data Availability at these 
meetings. Interested persons who wish to submit comments may do so 
during the 90 day public comment period described in the Notices.
    The first public meeting will take place on November 14, 1997, from 
8:30 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. at the Region VIII Environmental Protection 
Agency Conference Center, 999 18th Street, Second Floor, Denver, CO 
80202-2466. The second meeting will take place on November 17, 1997, 
from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. at the Environmental Protection Agency 
Auditorium, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460. EPA is inviting 
interested members of the public to attend the information sessions.

    Dated: October 28, 1997.
William R. Diamond,
Acting Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 97-28931 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P