alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                   2,701
<SECURITIES>                             3,173
<RECEIVABLES>                            9,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                              4,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        32,900
<PP&E>                                   2,456
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          42,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,581
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   430
<OTHER-SE>                              28,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            42,097
<SALES>                                 25,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        28,774
<CGS>                                   12,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           24,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         9,532
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (224)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          4,195
<INCOME-TAX>                             1,531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      2,664
<DISCONTINUED>                          (1,105)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,559
<EPS-BASIC>                              .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .30
<FN>
NOTE:  RECEIVABLES AND PP&E VALUES REPORTED REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
# Positive Net Capital Gains
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Ronaldo Reyes       | Attn:  Kristine Gullo |
| 1761 East St. Andrew Place           | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Santa Ana, CA  92705                 | Wilmington, DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Darnella Tinnel-Crawford       | Ally Bank |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700               | Attn:  Martha Tate |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 200 West Civic Center Drive |
|                                            | Sandy, UT 84070 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of September 17, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 0856 Directorate Identifier: 2012 - NM - 093 - AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  ORGANIZATION P ERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE ATA Jo e White 12/19/2003 Boeing Dennis Anderson, Tim

Dowling Numerous, 2003 - Present

Other/Additional Information: FAA Letter 150S - 11 - 5 and action stamp AS/130S/10/1196
**Exhibit 32.2**

**COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive CareCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007 (the “Report”), Robert J. Landis, as Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Comprehensive Care Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1972 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1972

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list of diseases 
associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents for which there is 
  a presumption of service connection for veterans who served in the 
  Republic of Vietnam to include hypertension, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2021

 Mr. Harder of California (for himself and Mr. Stauber) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list of diseases 
associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents for which there is 
  a presumption of service connection for veterans who served in the 
  Republic of Vietnam to include hypertension, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Care for Vietnam Veterans Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF ADDITIONAL DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE TO 
              CERTAIN HERBICIDE AGENTS FOR WHICH THERE IS A PRESUMPTION 
              OF SERVICE CONNECTION FOR VETERANS WHO SERVED IN THE 
              REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM.

    Section 1116(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, as amended by 
the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283), is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subparagraphs:
            ``(L) Hypertension.
            ``(M) Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined 
        significance.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JONATHAN CEPHUS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 346 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of November, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30582]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

United States International Telecommunications Advisory Committee 
(ITAC), Standardization Sector (ITAC-T) Study Groups D and CITEL AD-
HOC; Meeting Notice

    The Department of State announces that the United States 
International Telecommunications Advisory Committee Standardization 
Section (ITAC-T) Study Group D and CITEL AD-HOC will meet on Monday, 
January 5, 1998, Room 1207 at 9:00 a.m. and Tuesday, February 17, 1998, 
at 9:00 a.m. in the same room at the Department of State, 2201 C 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520.
    The agenda for study group D will include consideration of 
contributions for upcoming meetings of Study Group 9 and 16. The CITEL 
Ad Hoc Group will consider the Preparatory process for future CITEL 
meetings, review possible contributions for the tasks assigned under 
CITEL Restructure proposals. Any other matters within the competence of 
Study Group D or the CITEL Ad Hoc Group may be raised at either of 
those meetings.
    Persons presenting contributions to Study Group D should bring 20 
copies of such contributions to the meeting.
    Please Note: Persons intending to attend these meetings must 
announce this not later than 48 hours before the meeting to the 
Department of State by sending a fax to 202-647-7407. The announcement 
must include company/agency affiliation, name, Social Security number 
and date of birth. The above includes government and non-government 
attendees. One of the following valid photo ID's will be required for 
admittance: U.S. driver's license with picture, U.S. passport, U.S. 
government ID (company ID's are no longer accepted by Diplomatic 
Security). Enter from the ``C'' Street Main Lobby.

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
Gary M. Fereno,
Chairman, U.S. ITAC for CITEL and Study Group D.
[FR Doc. 97-30582 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-M
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Yisrael Gottlieb  the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer, Secretary  and Director of Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp , certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A #3 of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K/A #3 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: July 1, 2011
Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp .By:
/s/ Yisrael GottliebName:  Yisrael GottliebTitle:    Principal Accounting and Financial Officer, Secretary and Director





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BRITISH LAW INSURANCE CO., Ltd., et al., Appellant, v. JOVAN CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 69-499.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 23, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 21, 1970.

Batchelor, Brodnax, Guthrie & Kindred, Miami, for appellant.

Frank F. Cosgrove, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

The appellant insurance companies appeal from a final judgment for the plaintiff, Jovan Corporation. Jovan Corporation recovered against these underwriters by virtue of its rights under a breach of warranty endorsement attached to an insurance policy they issued on an airplane.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court was correct in ruling that Jovan Corporation had a lien on the aircraft named in the policy.

The breach of warranty endorsement attached to the insurance policy issued by the underwriters stated that this aircraft was “encumbered by a lien * * * held by Jovan Corporation and C.I.T. Corporation as their respective rights and interests may appear,” and they were described in print as “hereinafter called the lienholders.”

The record reveals a copy of a Bill of Sale on this aircraft from Leon H. Patin to Walnico, Inc. which certified that there was a chattel mortgage on the aircraft “in favor of C.I.T. Corp. and Jovan Corporation.” Testimony of Patin was introduced to show that he had executed a Bill of Sale showing Jovan Corporation and C.I.T. as lienholders and forwarded it to the Federal Aviation Authority in Oklahoma City for recording although there was no proof that it had been received or recorded by that agency.

We find that there was sufficient, competent and substantial evidence in the record to uphold the finding of the trial judge that Jovan Corporation had a lien on the aircraft. See § 697.01, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; Marcus v. Hull, 142 Fla. 306, 195 So. 170*604(1940); and Foster v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc., D.C.App.1968, 241 A.2d 914.

The final judgment for plaintiff is

Affirmed.
#### Margaret PEAVY, Appellant, v. Thomas M. CAIN et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 13, 1973.

Edward F. O’Connor, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Harry M. Hobbs, Tampa, for appellee Mid-State Homes, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the record on appeal, the briefs, and having heard oral argument are of the opinion that the appellant «Peavy, defendant and counter-claimant below, is entitled to possession of Lot 209 by virtue of the deed to said property which is sufficient to demonstrate legal title. See Moore v. Musa, Fla.App.1967, 198 So.2d 843. Accordingly, the final judgment with respect to appellant Peavy is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ„ and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30604]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Notice of Intent To Negotiate a Contract Among Wasatch County 
Special Service Area #1, Central Utah Water Conservancy District, and 
Department of the Interior for Carriage of Non-Project Water Through 
the Wasatch Canal as Part of the Wasatch County Water Efficiency 
Project and Daniel Replacement Project of the Central Utah Project 
Completion Act

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary--Water and Science, 
Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to negotiate a contract among Wasatch County 
Special Service Area #1 (WCSSA), Central Utah Water Conservancy 
District (District), and Department of the Interior for carriage of 
non-project water through the Wasatch Canal as part of the Wasatch 
County Water Efficiency Project and Daniel Replacement Project (WCWEP 
and DRP) under the Central Utah Project Completion Act.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public law 102-575, Central Utah Project Completion Act, 
Sections 202(a)(3), 207(e), and 303(b), allows for the construction of 
the WCWEP and DRP as part of the Central Utah Project. The WCWEP and 
DRP Projects provide for increasing irrigation efficiency in the Heber 
Valley, conserving water, and eliminating the diversion of water from 
the upper Strawberry River tributaries to Heber Valley. As part of 
these projects, the United States plans to acquire, and the District 
intends to improve, the Wasatch Canal, a feature which has historically 
been used to convey Provo River water to irrigators. The canal will be 
used to convey project water and non-project water for irrigation 
purposes.
    The purpose of the negotiation sessions will be to determine the 
amount of non-project water which will be conveyed through the Wasatch 
Canal and the price to be paid by WCSSA to the Department for conveying 
the non-project water.

DATES: Dates for public negotiation sessions will be announced in local 
newspapers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Additional information on matters related to 
this Federal Register notice can be obtained at the address and 
telephone number set forth below: Mr. Reed Murray, Program Coordinator, 
CUP Completion Act Office, Department of the Interior, 302 East 1860 
South, Provo UT 84606-6154, Telephone: (801) 379-1237, E-Mail address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9eecf3ebececffe7deebfdb0ebedfcecb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfbda2babdbdaeb68fbaace1babcadbde1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>

    Dated: November 17, 1997.
Ronald Johnston,
CUP Program Director, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 97-30604 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I,
Lance J. Millage, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tropicana Entertainment Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 11, 2011

/s/ LANCE J. MILLAGE Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### Carlton G. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 9, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 21, 1974.

Jeffrey I. Pattinson, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevm, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Baya Harrison, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

MANN, Chief Judge.

We find no coercive element, through “gentle persuasion” or otherwise, involved in the process of obtaining Mitchell’s statement. Mitchell asked to talk with Officer Spence, in whom he had confidence. There is no suggestion of improper inducements or threats. We therefore regard Rogers v. Richmond, 1961, 365 U.S. 534, 81 S.Ct. 735, 5 L.Ed.2d 760 and Lynumn v. Illinois, 1963, 372 U.S. 528, 83 S.Ct. 917, 9 L.Ed.2d 922 as inapposite.

We accordingly affirm the judgment. Mitchell was properly sentenced to 15 years for the offense of using a firearm in the commission of a felony, Fla.Stat. 790.07 (1971), F.S.A., but the additional sentence for attempted robbery, an offense of lower degree, was improper under the rule of Cone v. State, Fla.1973, 285 So.2d 12, opinion filed March 7, 1973, rehearing denied December 4, 1973. *See Also*Edmond v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 280 So.2d 449.

The judgment is affirmed. The sentence entered on the attempted robbery count is vacated. Under the circumstances, we see no need for a return of Mitchell to the Circuit Court for any further proceeding.

GRIMES, J., and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judge, concur.