# Patent

## Title
Method of treating a patient having an autoimmune disorder by administering an antibody that binds human BAFFR

## Abstract

Therapeutic regimens for administration of BAFF antagonists for treatment of immunologic and related disorders are described. Regimens involve a short-term BAFF antagonist administration course followed by an extended no-treatment period prior the round of administration.

## Background
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/512,880, filed Oct. 20, 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to therapeutic regimens used in treating immunologic and related disorders. More specifically, the invention relates to methods of treating autoimmune disorders utilizing antagonists of BAFF (B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
B cells play a central role in acquired immunity. These cells possess the unique ability to mount a rapid and directed antibody (Ab) response against foreign antigens (Ag), and to act as Ag presenting cells. To maintain B cell homeostasis and a self-tolerant state, it is necessary to generate a continuous pool of B cell precursors that will mature and migrate to peripheral organs, as well as maintain a process of negative selection to eliminate autoreactive B cells. Dysregulation in the B cell developmental process could lead to a block in B cell development, and thus immune deficiency, or conversely, to an escape and expansion of self-reactive B cells leading to autoimmunity.
Generation of high affinity, somatically hypermutated autoantibodies is one of the hallmarks of autoimmune conditions. The autoantibodies can cause severe tissue damage (e.g., as in lupus nephritis) or loss of blood components (e.g., as in immune thrombocytopenia purpura). The prevailing treatment strategies for autoimmune disorders employ global immunosuppressants that have harmful side effects with long-term use.
Recent discovery of the B cell survival and maturation factor BAFF (also known as TALL-1, THANK, BLyS, zTNF4, and TNFSF13B) provided a unique opportunity for developing targeted intervention strategies for autoreactive B cell function. Elucidation of the role of BAFF in acquired immunity has been rapid since its first description as a B cell growth factor. BAFF (Accession No. AAD25356) is described in, e.g., Schneider et al (1999) J. Exp. Med., 189:1697-1710; PCT Publication WO 99/12964 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/911,777. Studies have indicated that higher than normal levels of BAFF may contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis. For a review, see, e.g., Mackay et al. (2002) Nature Reviews: Immunology, 2:465-475; Kalled et al. (2003) Expert Opin. Ther. Targets, 7(1):115-23.
BAFF has been implicated in costimulation of B cells (Moore et al. (1999) Science, 285:260-263; Schneider et al. (1999) J. Exp. Med., 189:1747-1756; Mukhopadhyay et al. (1999) J. Biol. Chem., 274:15978-15981); increased B cell proliferation (Moore et al. (1999) Science, 285:260-263); and increased survival of normally deleted B cells (Khare et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 97:3370-3375; Gross et al. (2000) Nature, 404:995-999; Mackay et al. (1999) J. Exp. Med., 190:1697-1710). Three cognate receptors for BAFF have been identified: (1) B cell maturation antigen (BCMA; Accession No. S43486; Gross et al. (2000) Nature, 404:995-999; PCT Publication WO 01/12812; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/077,137); transmembrane activator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI; Accession No. AAP57629; Gross et al., supra); and most recently, BAFFR (also called BR3; Accession No. AF373846; Thompson et al. (2001) Science, 293:2108-2111). BAFFR is the only one of the three receptors that is specific for BAFF (Thompson et al., supra). BCMA and TACI bind not only to BAFF but also to another TNF family ligand, APRIL (Yu et al. (2000) Nat. Immunol., 1:252-256; Wu et al. (2000) J. Biol. Chem., 275:35478-35485; Rennert et al. (2000) J. Exp. Med., 192:1677-1684; PCT Publication WO 01/24811; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/115,192).
While BAFF has been unambiguously identified as a factor required for B cell survival and maturation, the role of APRIL in B cell homeostasis remains less well understood. APRIL was originally found to stimulate growth of tumor cells in vitro and in vivo (Hahne et al. (1998) J. Exp. Med., 188:1185-1190). Recent reports demonstrated that APRIL may act also as a costimulator of primary B and T cells in vitro and stimulate IgM production by peripheral blood B cells in vitro (Yu et al. (2000) Nat. Immunol., 1:252-256; Marsters et al. (2000) Curr. Biol., 10:785-788). In vivo administration of APRIL, like BAFF, results in splenomegaly due to expansion of the B cell population and an increase in the percentage of activated T cells (Yu et al. (2000) Nat. Immunol., 1:252-256), suggesting that APRIL may be involved in lymphoid homeostasis. Based on data generated using APRIL-transgenic mice, APRIL appears to play a role in T cell-independent type 2 (TI-2) humoral responses (Stein et al. (2002) J. Clin. Invest., 109(12): 1587-1598). Further, data generated using A/WySnJ mice demonstrate that APRIL is not required for B cell development and function (Thompson et al., supra).
Soluble forms of BAFF receptors have been made by fusing their extracellular domains to the Fc portion of immunoglobulin. Treatment of normal mice with such a soluble form of TACI or BCMA (TACI-Fc or BCMA-Fc) leads to reduced B cell numbers and a lack of humoral response (Shu et al. (1999) J. Leukoc. Biol., 65:680-683; Yan et al. (2000) Nat. Immunol., 1:37-41; Xia et al. (2000) J. Exp. Med., 192:137-143; Wang et al. (2001) Nat. Immunol., 2:632-637; Yu et al. (2000) Nat. Immunol., 1:252-256). For example, in a mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disease that involves both B and T cell components, TACI-Fc substantially inhibits inflammation and slows disease progression (Wang et al. (2001) Nat. Immunol., 2(7):632-637). These effects are thought to be attributed to BAFF sequestration because BAFF-deficient mice have a phenotype similar to that of TACI-Fc- or BCMA-Fc-treated mice (almost complete loss of mature B cells and a severely compromised humoral response) (Schiemann et al. (2001) Science, 293:2111-2114; Gross et al. (2001) Immunity, 15:289-302). Although a five-week treatment of NZBWF1 with TACI-Ig lead to a reduction in SLE symptoms at 12 weeks after the treatment, no reduction in autoantibodies was observed, indicating that a longer course of treatment may be necessary (Gross et al. (2000) Nature, 404(6781):995-999).
Recently, BAFF-specific agents, including BAFFR-Fc and BAFF antibodies, have been developed for treatment of autoimmune and other disorders (see, e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/911,777; 10/380,703; 10/045,574; and 60/458,707); Kalled et al. (2003) Expert Opin. Ther. Targets, 7(1):115-23). Once the administration of a BAFF-specific agent has ceased and the agent is eliminated from the bloodstream, B cell reconstitution to pre-treatment levels, including recovery of pathogenic B cells, is expected to occur within about 8 weeks (see, e.g., Porpiglia et al. (2003) Clin. Immunol., 107:90-97; Berardi et al. (1997) Blood, 89:3554-3564; Hiramatsu et al. (2003) Blood, 102:873-880). As a result, frequent administration of these drugs, at intervals of less than 8 weeks, may be necessary to maintain therapeutic benefits.
Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are still needed for the treatment of immune and related disorders.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention results from the realization that effective treatment of immunologic disorders can be accomplished by a short-term administration of a therapeutically effective amount of a BAFF antagonist, thereafter, temporarily discontinuing the administration of the antagonist for an extended period prior to the next round of the administration.
The invention is based, in part, on the surprising finding that a short-term 4-week administration of BAFFR-Fc to nephritic SNF1 mice with mild-to-moderate SLE results in a long-term clinical benefit (at least 6 months). Although B cell recovery does take place following administration of BAFFR-Fc, the newly emerging B cells are substantially non-pathogenic. The invention is further based, on the discovery and demonstration that the clinical effect of the short-term BAFFR-Fc administration in the SNF1 mice is significantly more pronounced and long-lasting as compared to the clinical effect observed upon administration of TACI-Fc in the same model.
The present invention provides methods for treating immunologic and related disorders in mammals, in particular autoimmune disorders, and includes (but is not limited to) methods for inhibiting autoantibody production, and/or inhibiting the generation of pathogenic B cell population in a mammal. The invention further provides methods for treating renal fibrosis and/or improving renal function, such as, e.g., pressure filtration, selective reabsorption, tubular secretion, and systemic blood pressure regulation. The invention yet further provides methods for decreasing cardiac inflammation. Methods of administration and compositions used in the methods of the inventions are also provided.
In certain embodiments, the method of treating a patient having an immunologic disorder, comprises:
(a) administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of a BAFF (B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family) antagonist at least once or at one or more intervals of less than N weeks;
(b) temporarily discontinuing the administration of step (a) for N weeks or longer; and
(c) repeating steps (a) and (b) at least once;
wherein N is 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12.
In some embodiments, the BAFF antagonist is a soluble BAFF receptor (e.g., BAFFR, BCMA, or TACI), an anti-BAFF antibody, or an anti-BAFF receptor antibody. In certain embodiments, the BAFF antagonist is BAFF-specific such as, for example, soluble BAFFR.
Additional aspects of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, and in part will be understood from the description or may be learned by practice of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCES
SEQ ID NO:1 is an amino acid sequence of human BAFFR (GenBankTM Accession No. AF373846). Special features noted in the Sequence Listing for this sequence: residue 1—none or any amino acid; residue 2—methionine, none, or any amino acid; residue 21—valine (wild type), asparagine, or another amino acid; residue 28—lysine (wild type), proline, or another amino acid; residue 47—none, any amino acid, or alanine.
SEQ ID NO:3 is an amino acid sequence of human BAFFR-Fc fusion protein, which includes a signal sequence (amino acids 1-22) and a human IgG1 Fc portion (amino acids 95-321). Special features noted in the Sequence Listing for this sequence: residue 41—valine (wild type), asparagine, or another amino acid; residue 48—lysine (wild type), proline, or another amino acid; residue 67—none, any amino acid, or alanine.
SEQ ID NO:2 is an amino acid sequence of murine BAFFR (GenBankTM Accession No. Q96RJ3).
SEQ ID NO:4 is an amino acid sequence of murine BAFFR-Fc fusion protein, which includes a signal sequence (amino acids 1-22) and a murine IgG1 Fc portion (amino acids 88-316).
SEQ ID NO:5 is an amino acid sequence of a BAFF-binding peptide derived from BAFFR.
SEQ ID NO:6 is an amino acid sequence of a minimal deletion in ΔBAFFR described in U.S. Patent Application No. 60/458,707.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIGS. 1A-1D demonstrate that a short-term BAFFR-Fc treatment inhibits renal lymphocyte infiltration in the kidneys of SNF1 mice as assessed by immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded kidney sections using biotin-anti-B220 mAb for B cells and anti-CD3 for T cells (50× magnification). FIGS. 1A and 1B show representative kidney sections from untreated mice of 9 and 50 weeks of age, respectively. Two groups of mice were administered either 200 μg of murine BAFFR-Fc or 200 μg of mIgG1, two times per week for four consecutive weeks starting at 23 weeks of age, and sacrificed at the age of 50 or 51 weeks, respectively. FIGS. 1C and 1D show representative kidney sections from BAFFR-Fc- and mIgG1-treated mice, respectively.
FIGS. 2A-2D demonstrate that a short-term BAFFR-Fc treatment inhibits lymphadenopathy in SNF1 mice as assessed by immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded mesenteric lymph node (MLN) sections using biotin-anti-B220 mAb for B cells and anti-CD3 for T cells (50× magnification). FIGS. 2A and 2B show representative MLN sections from untreated mice of 9 and 50 weeks of age, respectively. Two groups of mice were administered either 200 μg of murine BAFFR-Fc or 200 μg of mIgG1, two times per week for four consecutive weeks starting at 23 weeks of age, and sacrificed at the age of 50 or 51 weeks, respectively. FIGS. 2C and 2D show representative MLN sections from BAFFR-Fc- and mIgG1-treated mice, respectively.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In order that the present invention may be more readily understood, certain terms are first defined. Additional definitions are set forth throughout the detailed description.
The term “antibody,” as used herein, refers to an immunoglobulin or a part thereof, and encompasses any polypeptide comprising an antigen-binding site regardless of the source, method of production, and other characteristics. The term includes but is not limited to polyclonal, monoclonal, monospecific, polyspecific, non-specific, humanized, single-chain, chimeric, synthetic, recombinant, hybrid, mutated, and CDR-grafted antibodies. The term “antigen-binding domain” refers to the part of an antibody molecule that comprises the area specifically binding to or complementary to a part or all of an antigen. Where an antigen is large, an antibody may only bind to a particular part of the antigen. The “epitope,” or “antigenic determinant” is a portion of an antigen molecule that is responsible for specific interactions with the antigen-binding domain of an antibody. An antigen-binding domain may be provided by one or more antibody variable domains (e.g., a so-called Fd antibody fragment consisting of a VH domain). An antigen-binding domain comprises an antibody light chain variable region (VL) and an antibody heavy chain variable region (VH). The terms “anti-BAFF antibody” and “antibody directed against BAFF” refer to any antibody that specifically binds to at least one epitope of BAFF.
The term “BAFF” refers to B cell-activating factor, characterized by expression in immune cells and its role as a B cell survival factor. A summary of BAFF's characteristics is provided in Mackay et al. (2002) Nature Reviews: Immunology 2:465-475 and in Gavin et al. (2003) J. Biol. Chem., 278(40):38220-8.
As used herein, “BAFF antagonist” generally refers to any compound that directly downregulates the biological activity of BAFF. A molecule “directly downregulates” the biological activity of BAFF by interacting with a BAFF, BAFF gene, a BAFF transcript, or a BAFF receptor. A BAFF antagonist may, for example, bind to and neutralize the activity of BAFF; decrease BAFF expression levels; affect stability of BAFF; affect proteolytic cleavage of the membrane-bound form of BAFF into the soluble form; interfere with the binding of BAFF to one or more receptors; or it may interfere with intracellular signaling of a BAFF receptor. BAFF antagonists may be proteinaceous (e.g., antibodies, receptor fusion proteins, peptides) or non-proteinaceous molecules (e.g., small organic molecules (≦500 Da)). Methods for assessing neutralizing biological activity of BAFF antagonists are known in the art.
The term “BAFFR,” unless otherwise stated, refers to a protein that comprises at least a portion of wild-type or mutant receptor for BAFF, other than BCMA or TACI, that is capable of binding to BAFF. It has been determined that the BAFF-binding domain of human BAFFR contains amino acids 27 to 32 of SEQ ID NO:1. BAFFR is further defined in PCT Publication WO 02/24909 and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/380,703 and 60/458,707, and specifically includes, but is not limited to, human BAFFR (SEQ ID NO:1; Accession No. AAD25356; amino acid 47 of SEQ ID NO:1 is not present in some isoforms) and murine BAFFR (SEQ ID NO:3; Accession No. Q96RJ3). “BAFFR” also refers to naturally occurring variants, e.g., the splice variant containing an alanine at amino acid 47 of SEQ ID NO:1 corresponding to amino acid 67 of SEQ ID NO:2, as well as functional mutated forms of BAFFR, e.g., human BAFFR having mutations at least at amino acids 21 and 28 of SEQ ID NO:1 (e.g., V21 N and L28P). The terms “BAFFR-Fc” and “BAFFR-Ig” refer to a fusion protein comprising BAFFR and antibody constant region sequences, such as, for example, an Fc portion.
The term “BAFF-specific antagonist” refers to a compound that: (1) has the ability to counteract the effect(s) of BAFF in vivo or in vitro, e.g., by competitive blockage of one or more BAFF receptors, and (2) under physiologic conditions preferentially forms a relatively stable complex with BAFF but not with other ligands of the TNF family, such as, e.g., APRIL. Typically, the binding is considered specific when the affinity constant Ka for BAFF is higher than 106 M−1, preferably higher than 108 M−1, while the affinity for another TNF family ligand is lower than 106 M−1, preferably lower than 105 M−1. A skilled artisan recognizes that under certain conditions a low affinity but high avidity binding may also be specific even though Ka of the interaction may be relatively low. In some embodiments, affinity constant Ka of a BAFF-specific antagonist for at least one isoform of BAFF is preferably greater than 106 M−1, 107M−1, 108 M−1, 109 M−1, 1010 M−1, 1011 M−1, or 1012 M−1.
The phrase “substantially identical” means that a relevant amino acid sequence is at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% identical to a given sequence. By way of example, such sequences may be variants derived from various species, or they may be derived from the given sequence by truncation, deletion, amino acid substitution or addition. Percent identity between two amino acid sequences may be determined by standard alignment algorithms such as, for example, Basic Local Alignment Tool (BLAST) described in Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol., 215:403-410, the algorithm of Needleman et al. (1970) J. Mol. Biol., 48:444-453, or the algorithm of Meyers et al. (1988) Comput. Appl. Biosci., 4:11-17. Such algorithms are incorporated into the BLASTN, BLASTP, and “BLAST 2 Sequences” programs (see www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). When utilizing such programs, the default parameters can be used. For example, for nucleotide sequences the following settings can be used for “BLAST 2 Sequences”: program BLASTN, reward for match 2, penalty for mismatch −2, open gap and extension gap penalties 5 and 2 respectively, gap x_dropoff 50, expect 10, word size 11, filter ON. For amino acid sequences the following settings can be used for “BLAST 2 Sequences”: program BLASTP, matrix BLOSUM62, open gap and extension gap penalties 11 and 1 respectively, gap x_dropoff 50, expect 10, word size 3, filter ON.
The term “immunologic disorder” refers to disorders and conditions in which an immune response is aberrant. The aberrant response can be due to (a) abnormal proliferation, maturation, survival, differentiation, or function of immune cells such as, for example, T or B cells. Example of immunologic disorders include, but are not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), asthma, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis (MS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease, systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), type I diabetes, Wegener's granulomatosis, transplant rejection, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), hyperproliferative immune disorders, autoimmune diseases, B cell cancers, immunomodulation, antibody-mediated pathologies (e.g., ITCP, myasthenia gravis, and the like), and Sjogren's syndrome. The disorders that can be treated using the compositions and methods of the present invention include but are not limited to disorders described in PCT Publication WO 02/24909 and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/911,777; 10/380,703; 10/045,574; and 60/458,707.
The term “therapeutic” and cognates thereof, as used herein, refer to amelioration of clinical manifestations of a disorder, or production of a desired biological outcome. Examples of desirable outcomes include: reduced B cell hyperplasia; reduced autoantibody titer; reduced pathogenic B cell population; reduced cardiac inflammation; improving renal function (e.g., pressure filtration, selective reabsorption, tubular secretion, and systemic blood pressure regulation), slowed progression renal fibrosis, reduced renal lymphocyte infiltration; reduced lymphadenopathy, etc. Outcomes can be determined using methods known in the art and/or as described herein.
The term “pathogenic B cell” refers to a B cell that produces autoantibody which contributes to disease pathology.
The invention is based, in part, on the surprising finding that a short-term 4-week administration of BAFFR-Fc to nephritic SNF1 mice with mild-to-moderate systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) results in a long-term clinical benefit (at least 6 months). Given a short circulatory half-life of BAFFR-Fc in SNF1 mice (3.7 days), once BAFFR-Fc administration has ceased and BAFFR-Fc is eliminated from the bloodstream, B cell reconstitution is expected to occur within about 8 weeks. In experiments leading to the present invention, B cell recovery did take place following administration of BAFFR-Fc. However, the newly emerging B cells were found to be substantially non-pathogenic. The invention is further based, on the discovery and demonstration that the clinical effect of the short-term BAFFR-Fc administration in the SNF1 mice is significantly more pronounced and long-lasting as compared to TACI-Fc in the same model.
Methods of the inventions, compositions used therein, and other aspects of the invention are described in detail below.
Methods
The invention provides therapeutic regimens that involve a short-term BAFF antagonist administration course followed by an extended no-treatment period prior to the next round of administration.
In one aspect, the invention provides a therapeutic regimen for treating a patient having an immunologic or a related disorder. The regimen comprises:
(a) administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of a BAFF (B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family) antagonist at least once or at one or more intervals of less than N weeks;
(b) temporarily discontinuing the administration of step (a) for N weeks or longer; and
(c) repeating steps (a) and (b) at least once;
wherein N is 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12.
In further embodiments, the administration of step (a) comprises an interval of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 weeks. In step (a), the BAFF antagonist may, for example, be administered 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 times a week, weekly, biweekly, every 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 weeks. In the administration period of step (a), the intervals between sequential administrations as well as dosages may vary. For example, in the administration period of step (a), the BAFF antagonist may be administered twice in the first week, withdrawn for three weeks, administered once, withdrawn for next 5 weeks, then administered daily for a week. In various embodiments, the administration is temporarily discontinued, as in step (b), for 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 weeks or a longer period which may be limited to 50, 80, 110, 140, 180, 210, 260, or 300 weeks.
In one aspect, the invention provides methods for treating immunologic and related disorders in mammals, in particular autoimmune disorders, and includes (but is not limited to) methods for reducing autoantibody titer (e.g., anti-nuclear antibodies such as, for example, anti-ssDNA, anti-Sm, anti-RNP, and anti-Ro).
In another aspect, the invention further provides methods for treating renal fibrosis and/or improving renal function, such as, e.g., pressure filtration, selective reabsorption, tubular secretion, and systemic blood pressure regulation. In yet another aspect, the invention yet further provides methods for decreasing cardiac inflammation.
The invention further provides a method of reducing a pathogenic B cell population in a patient having an immune disorder. In certain embodiments, the pathogenic population of B cells is composed of B cells that are IgM-IgD+. B cell populations can be determined using, for example, antibodies to commonly used B cell markers such as, e.g., the B220 isoform of CD45 (Kincade et al. (1981) J. Immunol., 127: 2262-2268), or CD19 (see e.g., Krop et al. (1996) Eur. J. Immunol., 26:238-242) and respective isotype anti-immunoglobulin antibodies using methods known in the art and/or as described in the Examples.
The compositions of the invention may be administered in any manner that is medically acceptable. “Administration” is not limited to any particular delivery system and may include, without limitation, parenteral (including subcutaneous, intravenous, intramedullary, intraarticular, intramuscular, or intraperitoneal injection) rectal, topical, transdermal, or oral (for example, in capsules, suspensions, or tablets). Administration to an individual may occur in a single dose or in repeat administrations, and in any of a variety of physiologically acceptable salt forms, and/or with an acceptable pharmaceutical carrier and/or additive as part of a pharmaceutical composition (described earlier). Physiologically acceptable salt forms and standard pharmaceutical formulation techniques and excipients are well known to persons skilled in the art (see, e.g., Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR) 2003, 57th ed., Medical Economics Company, 2002; and Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, eds. Gennado et al., 20th ed, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2000).
Administration of an antagonist to an individual may also be accomplished by means of gene therapy, wherein a nucleic acid sequence encoding the antagonist is administered to the patient in vivo or to cells in vitro, which are then introduced into a patient, and the antagonist (e.g., antisense RNA, soluble BAFF receptor) is produced by expression of the product encoded by the nucleic acid sequence.
In certain embodiments, the patient to be treated using the methods of the invention has mild, moderate, or severe disease. In various embodiments, patients are those having an immunologic disorder and/or are at increased risk for developing renal insufficiency. The treatment may be particularly useful in patients with proteinuria of over 1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.7, 2.0 g per a 24-hour period, and/or serum creatinine levels of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mg/dl or higher. Other indications include creatinine clearance levels of lower than 97, 90, 80, 70, 60 (men) and 88, 80, 70, 60 (women) ml/min, blood urea of 20, 25, 30 mg/dl or higher, and/or those indicated by renal imaging (e.g., MRI, ultrasound), or renal biopsy. Yet other indications include above normal titer of antinuclear antibodies in the serum (e.g., anti-ssDNA, anti-Sm, anti-RNP, and anti-Ro) or above normal peripheral blood B cell (e.g., CD19+) counts of over 700, 1000, 1250, 1500, 2000 cells/μl. Tests for assessing these parameters can be preformed using methods known in the art, as described in the Examples, or in Jacobs et al. (eds.) (2002) Laboratory test handbook: Concise with disease index (2nd ed.) Husson, Ohio, Lexi-Comp.
The methods of the invention may be also used for treating patient having immunologic disorders where there is abnormal proliferation, maturation, survival, differentiation, or function of immune cells, such as, for example, B or T cells. The methods of the invention can be useful for treating pre-B or B cell leukemias, such as plasma cell leukemia, chronic or acute lymphocytic leukemia, myelomas (e.g., multiple myeloma, plasma cell myeloma, endothelial myeloma, and giant cell myeloma), and lymphoma (e.g., non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), Burkitt's lymphoma, non-Burkitt's lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, large cell lymphoma (e.g., immunoblastic lymphoma), marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, other B cell lymphomas, glomerulonephritis associated with diseases such as membranous nephropathy, IgA nephropathy (Berger's disease), IgM nephropathy, Goodpasture's disease, post-infectious glomerulonephritis, mesangioproliferative disease, chronic lymphoid leukemia, and minimal-change nephritic syndrome, secondary glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, pyelonephritis, nephrocalcinosis, nephrolithiasis, chronic or acute interstitial nephritis, hypertensive or large vessel diseases (including renal artery stenosis or occlusion and cholesterol emboli or renal emboli), renal or urological neoplasms, multiple myelomas, lymphomas, light chain neuropathy, amyloidosis, asthma and other chronic airway diseases such as bronchitis and emphysema, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, and Crohn's disease. The methods of the invention can also be used for inhibiting or neutralizing an effector T cell response and for treating conditions requiring immunosuppression, such as graft versus host disease and graft rejection, chronic inflammatory diseases, in particular, to lessen joint pain, swelling, anemia, and septic shock.
In the methods of the invention, the antagonist(s) is(are) administered as the sole active compound(s) or in combination with other compound(s) or composition(s). Unless otherwise indicated, the dose of antagonists administered is approximately 1 μg/kg and 250 mg/kg, depending on the severity of the symptoms and the progression of the disease. Most commonly, antibodies or immunoglobulin fusion proteins are administered in an outpatient setting by weekly administration of about 0.1-10 mg/kg doses by slow intravenous (IV) infusion. The appropriate therapeutically effective dose of an antagonist is selected by a treating clinician and would range approximately from 1 μg/kg to 100 mg/kg, 1 μg/kg to 50 mg/kg, 1 μg/kg to 20 mg/kg, 1 μg/kg to 10 mg/kg, 1 μg/kg to 1 mg/kg, 10 μg/kg to 1 mg/kg, 10 μg/kg to 100 μg/kg, 100 μg to 1 mg/kg, or 500 μg/kg to 5 mg/kg. Alternatively, specific dosages indicated in the Examples or for similar drugs in the Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR) 2003, 57th ed., Medical Economics Company, 2002, may be used.
Compositions
BAFF antagonists used in the methods of the present invention, include (but are not limited to) antibodies directed against BAFF, antibodies directed against one or more isoforms of at least one BAFF receptor, and soluble forms of BAFF receptors.
BAFF receptors include BAFFR (SEQ ID NO:1), BCMA (SEQ ID NO:7), and TACI (SEQ ID NO:8). In some embodiments, the BAFF antagonist is BAFF-specific (e.g., BAFFR), while in certain other embodiments the BAFF antagonist may also bind TNF family ligands other than BAFF (e.g., BCMA and TACI which also bind to APRIL). In some embodiments, the BAFF antagonist is an antibody that blocks BAFF binding to its receptor. Antibodies directed to BAFF and to BAFF receptors have been previously described. Producing such antibodies is well within the skill of a person skilled in the art (see, e.g., Antibody Engineering, ed. Borrebaeck, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 1995). Examples of antibodies for use in the methods of the invention include those described in PCT Publication WO 99/12964 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/911,777) and the anti-BAFF antibody LymphoStat-BTM (Human Genome Sciences, Rockville, Md.). In further embodiments, the antibody of the invention may specifically bind, besides BAFF or BAFFR, another protein that is substantially identical to BAFF or BAFFR, respectively. In yet further embodiments, antibodies are directed against BCMA and/or TACI. Also contemplated for use in humans are humanized forms and derivatives of nonhuman antibodies derived from any vertebrate species.
Other examples of antibodies for use in the methods of the invention include mouse monoclonal antibodies produced by hybridoma clone #2.1, deposited as ATCC No. PTA-3689, or by clone #9.1, deposited as ATCC No. PTA-3688, or humanized chimeric, or fully human derivatives thereof.
Soluble forms of BAFF receptor fusion proteins may comprise a BAFF-binding domain of BAFFR, BCMA, and/or TACI. A BAFF-binding domain is located within the extracellular domains (ECD), i.e., the portion of the protein normally present on the exterior of a cell expressing the protein. In some embodiments, the soluble BAFFR is a disulfide-linked peptide having the sequence CHWDLLRHWVC (SEQ ID NO:5) (Kayagaki et al. (2002) Immunity, 10:515-524), or a polypeptide comprising this sequence. In yet other embodiments, the soluble BAFFR is a polypeptide comprising amino acids 27 to 32 or 18 to 43 of SEQ ID NO:1.
In certain embodiments, a soluble form a BAFF receptor comprises a BAFF-binding domain of a BAFF receptor fused to a constant region of an immunoglobulin, i.e., as in BAFFR-Fc. In some embodiments, BAFFR-Ig comprises residues 3 to 73 of SEQ ID NO:1 fused to the Fc portion of IgG. In illustrative embodiments, BAFFR-Fc comprises SEQ ID NO:2 (human) or SEQ ID NO:4 (murine). In some embodiments, BAFFR is a human BAFFR having a C-terminal deletion starting from amino acid 51 of SEQ ID NO:1, which results in an altered O-linked glycosylation pattern (e.g., ΔBAFFR described in U.S. Patent Application No. 60/458,707). In some embodiments, soluble BAFFR comprises ΔBAFFR which lacks at least the sequence of SEQ ID NO:6 (corresponding to amino acids 51-57 of SEQ ID NO:1).
The BAFF-binding domain of BAFFR comprises amino acids (aa) 8 to aa 50, aa 13 to aa 50, or aa 13 to aa 43, or aa 18 to aa 43 of SEQ ID NO:1. In certain embodiments, the BAFF-binding domain is identical or substantially identical to aa 2 to aa 63 of SEQ ID NO:1 or to aa 2 to aa 62 of SEQ ID NO:3, including sequences that have been truncated or mutated so long as such sequences retain the ability to bind BAFF. In illustrative embodiments, BAFFR is a murine sequence as set out from aa 2 to aa 66 of SEQ ID NO:3. In other embodiments, BAFFR comprises at least 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50 contiguous amino acids of SEQ ID NO:1.
In certain embodiments, the constant region of an immunoglobulin comprises any one of CH1, CH2, or CH3 constant regions, or the entire Fc portion (that includes CH2, or CH3), with or without a hinge region. In more embodiments, the second amino acid sequence is derived from the Fc portion of an IgG. In related embodiments, the Fc portion is derived from IgG1, IgG4, or another IgG isotype. In illustrative embodiments, the contract region of an immunoglobulin comprises a sequence from aa 95 to aa 321 of SEQ ID NO:3, or aa 88 to aa 316 of SEQ ID NO:4. The second amino acid sequence may comprise the Fc portion of human IgG1, wherein the Fc is modified to minimize the effector function. Such modifications include changing specific amino acid residues that might alter an effector function such as Fc receptor binding (Lund et al. (1991) J. Immun., 147:2657-2662 and Morgan et al. (1995) Immunology, 86:319-324), or changing the species from which the constant region is derived. Immunoglobulins may have mutations in the CH2 region of the heavy chain that reduce effector function, i.e., Fc receptor binding and complement activation. For example, immunoglobulins may have mutations such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,624,821 and 5,648,260. In the IgG1 or IgG2 heavy chain, for example, such mutations may be made at amino acid residues corresponding to amino acids 234 and 237 in the full-length sequence of IgG1 or IgG2. Antibodies and immunoglobulin-receptor fusion proteins may also have mutations that stabilize the disulfide bond between the two heavy chains of an immunoglobulin, such as mutations in the hinge region of IgG4, as disclosed in Angal et al. (1993) Mol. Immunol., 30:105-108.
In certain embodiments, a BAFF-binding domain is fused at the C-terminus or the N-terminus, with or without a linker sequence, to the C-terminus or the N-terminus of the constant region of an immunoglobulin. The exact length and sequence of the linker and its orientation relative to the linked sequences may vary. The linker may, for example, comprise one or more Gly-Ser. The linker may be 2, 10, 20, 30, or more amino acid long and is selected based on properties desired such as solubility, length and steric separation, immogenicity, etc. It will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that certain amino acids in a sequence of any protein may be substituted for other amino acids without adversely affecting the activity of the protein. It is thus contemplated that various changes may be made in the amino acid sequences of BAFF receptor of the invention, or DNA sequences encoding therefore, as provided, without appreciable loss of their biological activity or utility.
The use of derivatives and analogs of BAFF receptors are also within the scope of the present invention. The derivatives or analogs should be functionally active, i.e., capable of exhibiting one or more activities associated with a ligand-binding domain of the wild-type BAFFR. Derivatives or analogs that retain this binding ability, or inhibit biological activity of BAFF can be produced and tested by procedures known in the art and/or as described in the Examples. Methods of producing such derivatives and analogs include recombinant and synthetic methods (see, e.g., Maniatis (1990) Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., and Bodansky et al. (1995) The Practice of Peptide Synthesis, 2nd ed., Spring Verlag, Berlin, Germany).
The following examples provide illustrative embodiments of the invention. While the representative procedures are performed in mice, a skilled artisan recognizes that they can be successfully performed within parameters clinically feasible in human subjects. The skilled artisan will recognize the numerous modifications and variations that may be performed without altering the spirit or scope of the present invention. Such modifications and variations are encompassed within the scope of the invention. The examples do not in any way limit the invention.
EXAMPLES
The following describes materials and methods used in the representative procedures and experiments described in the subsequent Examples.
Mice
Female (SWR xNZB)F1 (SNF1) mice were bred and maintained as previously described in, e.g., Gavalchin et al. (1987) J. Immunol., 138:138-148; Datta et al. 1989 Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol., 51:141-56.
Protein Reagents
An expression vector containing murine BAFFR-muIgG1 (BAFFR-Fc) was constructed by ligating a Not1+Aat2 fragment containing a signal sequence from a murine Ig-k gene, an Aat2+Sal1 fragment containing the sequence encoding aa 2 to aa 66 of murine BAFFR (Accession No. AF373847) and a Sal+Not1 fragment containing the sequence encoding aa 226 to aa 478 of murine IgG1 (Kabat system of numbering) into the Not1 site of a modified version (without the EBNA-1 gene) of pCEP4 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.), called CH269. The vector was transfected into 293 cells containing the EBNA-1 gene using LipofectamineTM according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen). The transfection was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 250 μg/ml G418. Medium was harvested every 4-7 days for several weeks. The conditioned medium was diluted with three volumes of high salt and high pH buffer (1.5 M glycine pH 8.9, 3 M NaCl) to increase the affinity of mBAFFR-mIgG for protein A. The BAFFR-Fc protein was purified by affinity chromatography (protein A) followed by size exclusion chromatography. Mouse IgG1 (mIgG1), produced by the MOPC21 hybridoma was purified in a similar fashion and was used as a negative control.
Treatment Protocol
Twenty 23 week-old female SNF1 mice with established nephritis (proteinuria of 30-100 mg/dL) were divided into two cohorts of ten mice/group. One cohort received 200 μg of mouse BAFFR-Fc and the other received 200 μg of mIgG1, 2 times per week for 4 consecutive weeks, and monitored thereafter for progression of disease. Mice that became moribund were euthanized, and tissues and blood samples were collected for analysis prior to sacrifice. Blood was also collected via the retro-orbital sinus at regular intervals for obtaining serum for autoantibody determination. At termination of the study, kidneys, hearts, and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) were placed in 10% neutral buffered saline and embedded into paraffin blocks for histologic analysis. The spleens were collected and used for flow cytometry.
Flow Cytometry
Single cell suspensions were made of splenocytes by mechanical disruption. Erythrocytes were lysed in an ammonium chloride solution, and cells were then washed 3 times, filtered through a 100-micron filter, and counted using a hemocytometer. Splenocytes were stained with a fluorochrome-conjugated anti-B220 mAb to detect B lymphocytes as described in Thompson et al. (2001) Science, 293:2108-2111.
Histology
Paraffin-embedded mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and kidney sections were assessed lymphocyte infiltration using rat anti-B220 mAb for B cells and rat anti-CD3 mAb for T cells, followed by biotinylated rabbit anti-rat and avidin-biotin-HRP solution, and visualized using the substrate DAB (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.). Kidney fibrosis was assessed by staining kidneys with Mason's trichrome stain and biotin-labeled anti-α smooth muscle actin followed by incubation with streptavidin-HRP and visualized with DAB substrate. Slides were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. Heart inflammation was assessed by examination of H&E-stained heart tissues.
Assessment of Renal and Cardiac Disease
The urine of each mouse was monitored weekly with AlbustixTM (Bayer Corp., Research Triangle Park, N.C.) to measure proteinuria. H&E-stained kidney sections were used for histologic examination and scored for: glomerular hypercellularity, enlargement, crescents, mesangial thickening, loops, fibrinoid necrosis and hyaline; interstitial sclerosis, infiltrate and vasculitis; and tubule vasculitis, atrophy and casts. Heart tissues were examined for vascular and cardiac inflammation and cardiac vacuolation. The grades of 0-4+ were given based on percent involvement of the structure being examined, wherein 0=none and 4+ is 100% involvement.
ELISA
The ELISA assay used to detect serum anti-ssDNA antibody was performed as described in Kalled et al. (1998) J. Immunol., 160:2158-2165.
Example 1
Short-term BAFFR-Fc Administration Increases Survival
As shown in Table 1, a short-course of BAFFR-Fc treatment markedly enhanced survival when compared to mIgG control-treated mice. At age 49 weeks, all BAFFR-Fc-treated mice were alive, while only 30% of control mice remained alive.









TABLE 1








Percent survival



Age
Treatment










(weeks)
BAFFR-Fc
mIgG












23
100
100


29
100
100


30
100
90


31
100
90


32
100
80


33
100
70


34
100
30


49
100
30









Example 2
Short-Term BAFFR-Fc Administration Reduces Progression of Nephritis
Renal function was assessed by proteinuria determination at regular intervals. As shown in Table 2, progression of disease to severe nephritis (proteinuria ≧300 mg/dL) was significantly reduced in BAFFR-Fc-treated mice when compared to mIgG-treated control mice. By age 49 weeks, all control mice developed severe nephritis, while no BAFFR-Fc-treated animal had severe nephritis at that age. In a separate experiment, SNF1 mice were treated with human IgG or with human TACI-Fc (a receptor-Fc fusion protein that binds to both BAFF and APRIL) at 200 μg twice per week for four weeks. Although TACI-Fc administration somewhat reduced the incidence of severe nephritis initially, eventually all TACI-Fc-treated mice developed severe nephritis similarly to controls (Table 2).








TABLE 2








Percent incidence of severe nephritis


Age
Treatment











(wks)
BAFFR-Fc
mIgG
Human TACI-Fc
Human IgG














23
0
0
0
0


27
0
30
34
60


30
0
70
60
80


36
0
90
100
100


49
0
100
100
100









Renal disease was further assessed by an histologic approach. H&E stained kidney sections were scored for renal disease by combining the scores of the individual disease parameters described in Materials and Methods. As seen in Table 3, BAFFR-Fc-treated mice had significantly reduced cumulative disease scores when compared to mIgG-treated or untreated controls, and the scores of BAFFR-Fc-treated mice were closer to that of young SNF1 mice, prior to disease onset.








TABLE 3







Age
Cumulative kidney disease score (mean ± SD)










(weeks)
BAFFR-Fc
untreated
mIgG





9

1 ± 0 (n = 3)1



49-51
6.3 ± 2.5 (n = 10)
24.3 ± 8.6 (n = 4)
23.9 ± 8.6 (n = 7)





1n indicates the number of mice used in analysis.






In SLE-nephritis, renal fibrosis often occurs and may be mediated by secretion of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, α-smooth muscle actin (ASMA) and collagen, by fibroblasts and mesangial cells. ECM production was significantly (p<0.05, Student's t test) diminished in mice treated with BAFFR-Fc as compared to untreated and mIgG-treated SNF1 mice, as observed by reduced ASMA (Table 4) and collagen (Table 5) deposition in the kidneys. Young, 9 week-old SNF1 mice were used as pre-disease controls.








TABLE 4








Percent glomeruli exhibiting collagen deposition1


Age
(mean ± SD)










(weeks)
BAFFR-Fc
untreated
mIgG





9

0 (n = 3)



49-51
3.3 ± 8.8 (n = 10)
48.2 ± 36.2 (n = 4)
68.8 ± 33.2 (n = 7)





170-111 glomeruli were examined for each mouse.














TABLE 5








Percent glomeruli exhibiting ASMA production1


Age
(mean ± SD)










(weeks)
BAFFR-Fc
untreated
mIgG





9

0 (n = 3)



49-51
8.5 ± 10.9 (n = 10)
57.5 ± 29.5 (n = 4)
68.5 ± 32.1 (n = 7)





170-111 glomeruli were examined for each mouse.






Healthy kidneys do not harbor lymphoid clusters. However, accompanying disease in this model of SLE-nephritis, as well as in human disease, is infiltration of leukocytes into the kidney, including B and T cells, forming follicular-like structures. Therefore, kidney sections were examined for the presence of T and B cell infiltrates. In untreated (FIG. 1B) and mIgG-treated (FIG. 1D) mice, large areas of T and B cell infiltrates that mimic white pulp areas of secondary lymphoid tissues were observed throughout the kidneys. In contrast, in kidneys of mice that received short-term BAFFR-Fc treatment (FIG. 1C), infiltration of B cells, as well as T cells, was markedly reduced (FIG. 1). Few or no B or T cells were observed in healthy, 9 week-old (pre-disease) SNF1 mice (FIG. 1A).
Example 3
Short-Term BAFFR-Fc Administration Inhibits Cardiac Inflammation
H&E-stained paraffin sections of hearts were examined for vascular and cardiac inflammation, and cardiac vacuolation. As seen in Table 6, SNF1 mice that received BAFFR-Fc had an overall markedly reduced cardiac score when compared to mIgG and untreated control mice.








TABLE 6







Age
Cardiac score (mean ± SD)










(weeks)
BAFFR-Fc
untreated
mIgG





9

0 (n = 3)1



49-51
1.2 ± 0.4 (n = 10)
2.5 ± 1.1 (n = 4)
4.7 ± 1.9 (n = 3)





1n indicates the number of mice used in the analysis.






Example 4
Short-Term BAFFR-Fc Administration Prevents B Cell Hyperplasia
Based on a study of BAFF blockade in normal BALB/c mice with BAFFR-Fc, 100 μg once a week for 4 consecutive weeks, peripheral B cell numbers are known to be fully restored within about 9 weeks after the last dose of BAFFR-Fc (data not shown). The number of splenic B cells in the SNF1 mice was determined 26-28 weeks after the last dose of BAFFR-Fc or mIgG. As seen in Table 7, SNF1 mice that received a short course of BAFFR-Fc treatment had a significantly reduced (p<0.05, Student's t test) splenic B cell number than untreated or mIgG-treated control mice. With time, control mice developed severe splenic B cell hyperplasia. In contrast, BAFFR-Fc-treated mice exhibited a long-term benefit wherein at the end of the study, splenic B cell counts were between that of pre-disease, 9 week-old SNF1 mice, and 20 week-old SNF1 mice that have begun to experience B cell expansion.








TABLE 7







Age
Number of splenic B cells (×106)










(weeks)
BAFFR-Fc
untreated
mIgG





 9

34.3 ± 9 (n = 3)



20

123 (n = 1)



49-51
77.4 ± 41.7 (n = 10)
197.4 ± 62 (n = 4)
141 ± 70.6 (n = 3)









In addition, immunohistochemical analysis of the B and T cell organization in MLN demonstrated that untreated (FIG. 2B) and mIgG-treated (FIG. 2D) mice had extensive B cell expansion, resulting in lymphadnopathy. In contrast, BAFFR-Fc-treated mice (FIG. 2C), did not exhibit B cell hyperplasia and looked similar to young SNF1 mice prior to disease onset (FIG. 2A).
Example 5
Short-Term BAFFR-Fc Administration Inhibits Increasing Production of Autoantibody
Sera obtained from SNF1 mice at regular intervals were analyzed for circulating anti-ssDNA antibody using an ELISA format. When examining the change of anti-ssDNA levels with time, from the start of treatment to age 37 weeks, there is a significant change (increase) in anti-ssDNA in the mIgG-treated mice (p<0.05 using the Student-Newman-Keuls method), however, there is no significant change in autoantibody levels in mice that received BAFFR-Fc (Table 8). This indicates that BAFF blockade with BAFFR-Fc inhibits autoantibody production, which may contribute to decreased pathology in BAFFR-Fc-treated mice. Notably, autoantibody levels remained decreased compared with controls 10 weeks (age 37 weeks) after the last dose of BAFFR-Fc had been administered.









TABLE 8








Anti-ssDNA (μg/ml)



Age
Treatment










(weeks)
BAFFR-Fc (n = 10)
mIgG (n = 10)












23
 0.11
0.15


29
0.4
1.1


37
0.7
24.3





1Values reflect geometric means.






Example 6
Short-Term BAFFR-Fc Administration Reduces Percentage of IgM−IgD+ B Cells
At the end of the study, BAFFR-Fc-treated and mIgG-treated mice had a similar frequency of total B cells in the blood, based on staining for B220+ B cells. However, when specific B cell subsets were examined, BAFFR-Fc-treated mice exhibited a statistically significant reduction (p<0.01, Student's t test) in the percent of IgM−IgD+ B cells (Table 9). The general reconstitution of peripheral B cells, yet the selective, marked reduction in IgM− IgD+ B cells and long-term efficacy in BAFFR-Fc-treated mice suggests that BAFFR-Fc causes a long-term reduction in these presumably pathogenic B cells.









TABLE 9








Percent blood B cells (mean ± SD)











BAFFR-Fc1
mIgG1














IgM−IgD+B cells
 8.7 ± 5.0
44.9 ± 7.3



Total B220+B cells
47.3 ± 9.3
49.6 ± 8.6





1Mice were 49-51 weeks of age at the time of analysis.






The specification is most thoroughly understood in light of the teachings of the references cited within the specification. The embodiments within the specification provide an illustration of embodiments of the invention and should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention. The skilled artisan readily recognizes that many other embodiments are encompassed by the invention. All publications and patents and sequences cited in this disclosure are incorporated by reference in their entirety. To the extent the material incorporated by reference contradicts or is inconsistent with the present specification, the present specification will supercede any such material. The citation of any references herein is not an admission that such references are prior art to the present invention.
The following applies unless otherwise indicated: all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, cell culture, treatment conditions, and so forth used in the specification, including claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about”; the term “at least” preceding a series of elements is to be understood to refer to every element in the series. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the following claims.

## Claims

1. A method of treating a patient having an autoimmune disorder, comprising:
(a) administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of an antibody that binds to SEQ ID NO:1 at least once or at one or more intervals of less than N weeks;
(b) temporarily discontinuing the administration of step (a) for N weeks or longer; and
(c) repeating steps (a) and (b) at least once;

wherein N is 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of step (a) comprises an interval of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 weeks.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the antibody is administered in step (a) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 times a week.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration is discontinued in step (b) for 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 weeks or longer.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein at the beginning of the treatment the patient has one or more of:
(i) proteinuria of 1 g per a 24-hour period or higher;
(ii) serum creatinine levels of about 1 mg/dl or higher;
(iii) creatinine clearance levels of 97 ml/min or lower;
(iv) blood urea of 20 mg/dl or higher;
(v) abnormal titer of autoantibodies in the serum; and
(vi) peripheral blood B cell count of 700 cells/μl.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the patient is human.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the therapeutically effective amount of the antibody is sufficient to inhibit autoantibody titer.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the therapeutically effective amount of the antibody is sufficient to reduce B cell hyperplasia.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the therapeutically effective amount of the antibody is sufficient to reduce cardiac inflammation.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the therapeutically effective amount of the antibody is sufficient to improve renal function.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the renal function is one or more of: pressure filtration, selective reabsorption, tubular secretion, and systemic blood pressure regulation.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the therapeutically effective amount of the antibody is sufficient to reduce progression of renal fibrosis.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the therapeutically effective amount of the antibody is sufficient to reduce lymphocyte infiltration in the kidneys.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the therapeutically effective amount of the antibody is sufficient to reduce lymphadenopathy.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the autoimmune disorder is systemic lupus erythematosus.

16. A method of reducing autoantibody titer in a patient, comprising:
(a) administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of an antibody that binds to SEQ ID NO:1 at least once or at one or more intervals of less than N weeks;
(b) temporarily discontinuing the administration of step (a) for N weeks or longer;
and
(c) repeating steps (a) and (b) at least once;

thereby reducing autoantibody titer, and wherein N is 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12.

17. A method of inhibiting generation of pathogenic B cells in a patient, comprising:
(a) administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of an antibody that binds to SEQ ID NO:1 at least once or at one or more intervals of less than N weeks;
(b) temporarily discontinuing the administration of step (a) for N weeks or longer; and
(c) repeating steps (a) and (b) at least once;

thereby inhibiting generation of pathogenic B cells, and wherein N is 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the pathogenic B cells are IgM−IgD+.