alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HHF South Carolina Date: October 1, 2018

A-1

SCHEDULE A

BASIC INFORMATION

Eligible Entity Information:

Name of the Eligible Entity: SC Housing Corp. (“SCHC”) 

Corporate or other organizational form: Nonprofit corporation 

Jurisdiction of organization: South Carolina

Notice Information:

HFA Information:

Name of HFA: South Carolina State Housing Finance and 

Development Authority

Organizational form: a public body, corporate and politic under 

the laws of the State of South Carolina

Date of Application: June 1, 2010

Date of Action Plan: September 1, 2010 

Notice Information:

Program Participation Cap: $317,672,763.00

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Original HHF Funds: $138,000,000.00

Portion of Program Participation Cap

Representing Unemployment HHF Funds: $58,772,347.00

Rounds 1-4 Funding Allocation: $295,431,547.00

Round 5 Funding Allocation: $22,241,216.00

Program Funds: $266,362,238.00

Permitted Expenses: $51,310,525.00

Closing Date: August 3, 2010

First Amendment Date: September 23, 2010

Second Amendment Date: September 29, 2010
HHF South Carolina Date: October 1, 2018

A-2

Third Amendment Date: December 16, 2010

Fourth Amendment Date: August 31, 2011

Fifth Amendment Date: November 15, 2012

Sixth Amendment Date: October 30, 2013

Seventh Amendment Date: July 31, 2014

Eighth Amendment Date: September 29, 2015

Ninth Amendment Date: November 24, 2015

Tenth Amendment Date: May 3, 2016

Eligible Entity Depository Account Information: See account information set forth in the

Depository Account Control Agreement 

between Treasury and Eligible Entity 

regarding the HHF Program.
#### Robert HILL, Petitioner, v. WILLIAMS PAVING COMPANY, Inc. and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 39327.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 31, 1970.

Jerry A. Burns, Miami Beach, for petitioner.

J. Ben Watkins, of Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, and Warren C. Rose, of Rose & Marlow, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The Full Commission vacated the Order of the Judge of Industrial Claims and remanded the cause for the entry of an order in accordance with the views expressed. We are generally in accord with the action of the Full Commission in sending the case back to the Judge, but are of the view, and so hold, that on remand the Judge of Industrial Claims shall be empowered to take such further testimony as he determines to be necessary to decide and dispose of the matters set forth in the Full Commission’s Order. On remand the Judge is further authorized to take additional evidence if necessary to determine a proper award for temporary total and permanent partial benefits and attorneys fees.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and HODGES, Circuit Judge, concur.
#### William Robert THOMPSON and Northwestern Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Pershing W. MAROE, as administrator, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-257.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 1973.

Thomas A. Hoadley, Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Donald E. Brodbeck, Simpson, Anstead & Brodbeck, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an order granting plaintiff a new trial in a suit for damages in a negligence action is dismissed upon authority of Clement v. Aztec, Fla.App.1973, 283 So.2d 68.

Dismissed.

WALDEN, MAGER and CROSS, JJ„ concur.
Docket Number: FAA-2012-0675
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            7460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5487
<ALLOWANCES>                                        77
<INVENTORY>                                       4119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2719
<PP&E>                                            3223
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5120
<BONDS>                                             98
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           734
<OTHER-SE>                                       15654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23873
<SALES>                                           7540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7540
<CGS>                                             3329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1948
<INCOME-TAX>                                       752
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
#### Al Douglas PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. U-3.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 17, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 21, 1974.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal and briefs of the parties herein having been fully considered, and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed is erroneous, the said judgment is therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1169 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM050AD

SBF100 - 32 - 156, R1 --- 6/29/09 MESSIER- DOW TY

F100 - 32 - 77 --- 6/6/95

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administratio n

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29179]



[[Page 59850]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review, Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Air Force Academy Candidate 
Activities Record; USAFA Form 147; OMB Number 0701-0063.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 4,004.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 4,004.
    Average Burden Per Response: 45 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 3,003.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain data on a candidate's family and personal background for use 
in determining eligibility and selection to the Air Force Academy. The 
information collected under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 9346. The 
respondents are students applying for admission to the U.S. Air Force 
Academy. Each student's high school athletic, nonathletic, and 
extracurricular activities are reviewed to determine eligibility. If 
the information on this form is not collected, the individual cannot be 
considered for admittance to the Air Force Academy.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DOD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: October 30, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-29179 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EX-32   ·   Section 1350 Certifications




QUANTUM ASSETS INC.





Pursuant to Section  18U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002 (subsection  (a) and (b) of  section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18, United  States  Code),  each of the  undersigned  officers  of Quantum Assets Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2009  (the  "Form  10-K")  of  the  Company   fully   complies   with  the requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  information  contained  in the  Form  10-K  fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 14, 2010By:
/s/ Steve CurlingSteve CurlingPrincipal Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Andatee China Marine Fuel Services Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Wen Tong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for said period.





/s/ Wen TongWen Tong, Chief Financial Officer




Date:  March 31, 2011




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000023055
<NAME> GROUP 1 SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,983
<SECURITIES>                                     8,034
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,407
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,320
<PP&E>                                           3,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        916
<COMMON>                                        27,102
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,559
<SALES>                                         16,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,757
<CGS>                                            6,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    618
<INCOME-TAX>                                       239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       365
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
#### Fred McCLUSKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1156.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 27, 1973.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Neis R. Pearson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COLLAGEN CORPORATION INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          21,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                       370
<INVENTORY>                                      6,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,709
<PP&E>                                          36,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,173
<BONDS>                                         11,370
<COMMON>                                           106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,095
<SALES>                                         14,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,940
<CGS>                                            3,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,638)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,913
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,551)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,551)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.95)
        

</TABLE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1005 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INVESTMENT GUARANTIES 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KOSOVO 

Signed at Washington June 30, 2009 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 KOSOVO 

 Investment Guaranties 

 Agreement signed at Washington June 30, 2009; 

 Entered into force October 5, 2009.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62030-62031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-172-008]


ANR Storage Company, Notice of Compliance Filing

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 7, 1997, ANR Storage Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to be 
effective November 1, 1997.
    ANR states that the attached tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's Order issued on October 24, 1997 in 
the above captioned docket.
    ANR states that copies of the filing were served upon the company's 
Jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the

[[Page 62031]]

Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies 
of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30448 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 32 88

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mar co Ant on io Alav ez-Na rv aez,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

,

v.
Je ffer so n B . Ses si on s, II I, Att or ne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s, 1

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Resp on de nt

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Ju ne 16 , 20 17 Fi le d: Ju ly 13, 2 01 7 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, COLLOTON , and GRUENDER, Circu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Mex ic an ci ti zen Mar co Alav ez-Na rv aez pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of an or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s di sm is si ng hi s ap p e a l f r o m th e de ci si on of an

Je ffer so n B. Ses si on s, III is su bs ti tu te d fo r hi s pr ed eces so r un de r Fed eral Ru le 1 of App el la te Pro ced ur e 4 3( c).im m ig rat io n jud ge de nyin g hi m as y lu m an d wit hh o l d i n g o f rem ov al

. In hi s pr o se

ap pe al , Alav ez ch al le ng es th e im m ig rat io n jud ge ’s fin di ng s reg ard in g th e ti m el in es s of hi s as y lu m ap pl ic at io n. He a r g u e s f or th e fir st ti m e th at he is a m em be r of a pa rti cu la r so ci al gro up who se m em be rs are so ns of m

ur de red ga ng lea de rs . And he cl ai m s th at he ha d a well -fo un de d fear of pe rs ecu ti on , be cau se th e ga ng ha d th e cap ab il i t y a n d in cl in at io n to pu ni sh hi m fo r tryin g to ob ta in in fo rm at io n ab ou t hi s fat he r’s de at h.

Thi s co ur t la ck s juri sd ic ti on to rev ie w bo th th e ti m el in es s of Alav ez’s as y lu m ap pl ic at io n, se e 8 U.S.C. § 11 58 (a)( 3) , an d Alav ez’s un ex ha us te d arg um en t cl ai m in g pr ot ect ed st at us ba se d on hi s m em be rs hi p in a pa rti cu la r so ci al gr ou p. Se e 8 U.S.C. § 12 52 (d )(1 ); Mar ti ne

z Ca rc amo v. Hol de r , 71 3 F.3d 91 6, 92 5 (8t h Cir. 20 13 ). W e al so co nc lu de th at Alav ez di d no t es ta bl is h a ne xu s be twee n hi s fear ed ha rm an d an y pr ot ect ed gr ou nd , as hi s pe rcei ve d th reat was b a s ed on pu rel y pe rs on al ret rib ut io n. Se e Mar ti ne

z- Gal ar za v. Hol de r , 78 2 F.3 d 99 0, 99 3- 94 (8 th Ci r. 20 15 ). Acco rd in gl y , we de ny the pe ti ti on

. Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Order entered June 28, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00852-CR

No. 05-18-00853-CR

TYRAN DARNELLE WILSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 30121, 30122

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the January 7, 2019 motion of 

Peter I. Morgan for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk 

of the Court to remove Peter I. Morgan as counsel of record for appellant. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future 

correspondence to Tyran Darnelle Wilson, TDCJ No. 02212651, Wallace Unit, 1675 South FM 

3525, Colorado City, Texas, 79512.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
----

| RE: | Tasman Metals Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2014 (the "Annual Report") and Management's Discussion and Analysis for the Year Ended August 31, 2014 (the "2014 MD&A") |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1. | The amended and restated technical report entitled "Amended and Restated Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Norra Kärr (REE - Y - Zr) Deposit, Gränna, Sweden" dated July 9, 2013, which the undersigned has prepared (the "Norra Kärr PEA Report"); |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report, Norra Karr REE - Zirconium Deposit, Granna, Sweden"  dated January 20, 2011, which the undersigned has prepared  (the "Technical Report"); and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | The amended and restated technical report entitled "Amended and Restated Technical Report for Olserum REE Deposit, Southern Sweden" dated June 20, 2013, which the undersigned has prepared (the "Olserum Report"). |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
SWORCCPP-000411