alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEER**

 

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and report evaluating a portion of Cenovus Energy Inc. oil and gas reserves data, including estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2014, estimated using forecast prices and costs, and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in Cenovus Energy Inc.’s annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and Cenovus Energy Inc.’s registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-163397), Form F-3D (File No. 333-166419), and Form F-10 (File No. 333-196696), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.

 
| GLJ   PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD. |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   |
| /s/   Keith M. Braaten           |   |
| Keith   M. Braaten, P. Eng.      |   |
| President &   CEO       |   |
|                             |   |
| Calgary,   Alberta               |   |
| February 13,   2015         |   |

 

----
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM N-PX ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF DWS GNMA Fund A Series of DWS Income Trust Investment Company Act file number  811-4049 DWS Income Trust (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)  345 Park Avenue New York, NY  10154 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code) John Millette Secretary One Beacon Street Boston, MA  02110 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code:617-295-1000 Date of fiscal year end:09/30 Date of reporting period:7/1/08-6/30/09 Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles. A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.   ******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-04049
Reporting Period: 07/01/2008 - 06/30/2009
DWS Income Trust









============================== B    DWS GNMA FUND ==============================

There is no proxy  voting  activity  for the fund,  as the fund did not hold any
votable positions during the reporting period.


========== END NPX REPORT  
  SIGNATURES [See General Instruction F] Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. (Registrant)
        DWS Income Trust
  By (Signature and Title)*/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark, Chief Executive Officer
 Date8/17/09 * Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 96-60023 

Summary Calendar

______________

GERALD MINGO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PEARL RIVER VALLEY POWER ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(2:95-CV-346)

_________________________________________________________________

August 6, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

Appellant Gerald Mingo ("Mingo") appeals the dismissal of his

action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The district court

found that his action was barred by limitations and additionally

that summary judgment should be granted because Mingo failed to

establish a prima facie case of race discrimination. After

considering the briefs and record, we affirm for the following

reasons:
2

1. Mingo does not challenge the district court's findings

and conclusions with respect to his failure to establish a prima

facie case.

2. Mingo presented no summary judgment evidence to rebut

Appellee's race neutral explanation that Mingo was terminated

solely because of his inability to return to work.

3. The district court correctly determined that Mingo's

cause of action was time barred. The trial court correctly noted

that the alleged discriminatory act was the decision to terminate

Mingo's employment. Mingo was well aware of that action more than

three years prior to the date he filed his complaint in the

district court.

AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 3, 2021

No. 04-20-00607-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J.D., A CHILD

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-0025-CV-C

Honorable Thomas Nathaniel Stuckey, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

We grant appellee's motion for extension of time to file a brief. We order appellee's brief 

due March 15, 2021.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of March, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 11-10862 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. PHILLIP MARVIN CANADA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-1-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Phillip Marvin Canada has moved for leave to w ithdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v . California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United State s v . Flores , 632 F.3d 2 29 ( 5th Cir. 2011). Canada has not filed a r esponse. We have reviewed co u n s e l ’ s b r i efs and the relevant portio n s o f the r ecord reflected therein. We concur with c ounsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue f or appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r l e a ve to withdraw i s GRANTED, counsel is U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D February 19, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 11-10862 Document: 00512146172 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2013No. 11-10862

excused from further r esponsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R

. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-10862 Document: 00512146172 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2013
#### DOLESE CONCRETE COMPANY v. Nicholas TESSITORE, Jr.

No. 62311.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Dolese Concrete Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 357 So.2d 869.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., dissents from the denial on basis of assignment No. 2.
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

‐‐‐‐ooOoo‐‐‐‐

James H. Larsen,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Randall Wright,

Defendant and Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PER CURIAM DECISION

Case No. 20110770‐CA

F I L E D

(January 6, 2012)

     2012 UT App 9

‐‐‐‐‐

Third District, West Jordan Department, 110401936

The Honorable Andrew H. Stone

Attorneys: James H. Larsen, Provo, Appellant Pro Se

Peter C. Schofield, Orem, for Appellee

‐‐‐‐‐

Before Judges McHugh, Thorne, and Christiansen.

¶1 James H. Larsen appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his complaint.  This is

before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a

substantial question for review.  Larsen failed to respond to the motion.  As a result of

his failure to respond and the lack of a viable legal issue identified in his docketing

statement, he has failed to identify a substantial question for review warranting further

consideration by this court.  See Utah R. App. P. 10.  Absent a substantial issue for

review, this court may summarily affirm a district court’s order.
20110770‐CA 2

¶2 Affirmed.

____________________________________

Carolyn B. McHugh,

Presiding Judge

____________________________________

William A. Thorne Jr., Judge

____________________________________

Michele M. Christiansen, Judge
SERVED: May 15, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MULTI- AERO, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No. FAA-2013- 0718 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

1. On or before July 1, 2014, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses 

to production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve 

a discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for 

resolution in a timely manner; 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Shane Storz, Director of Operations 

Multi-Aero, Inc., Respondent 

12300 Old Tesson Road, Suite 200F 

St. Louis, MO 63128 

ONE COPY 

Jared M. Allen, Respondent's Counsel 

The A via:tion Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

David B. Kessler, Complainant's Counsel 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0718 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Directorate Counsel, Office ofRegional Counsel, Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust Street, DOT Building, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings; M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

·TEL:· 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00550-CR

Angela Ann Rhodes a/k/a Angelia 

Ann Davis a/k/a Angie Ann Davis

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 355th District Court

of Hood County (CR12371)

February 5, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER95-19-015]


PECO Energy Power Team; Notice of Filing

November 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 7, 1997, PECO Energy Power Team 
tendered for filing a membership signature page for membership in 
Northwest Regional Transmission Association.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests must be filed on or before November 14, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29537 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION OF THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Combined Arts Panel, Visual Arts Section (Creation & Presentation 
Category) to the National Council on the Arts will be held on November 
18-21, 1997. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on 
November 18 and 19, 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on November 20, and 9:00 
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on November 21, in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C., 20506. A 
portion of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on November 21, 
will be open to the public for a policy discussion of guidelines, 
planning field needs and trends, and Leadership Initiatives.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 
to November 18 and 19, 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on November 20 and 11:15 
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on November 11, are for the purpose of Panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the 
determinations of the Chairman of March 31, 1997, these sessions will 
be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) 
of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-29462 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
#### CITY OF ORLANDO, Florida, Petitioner, v. Linwood Herman NEWELL, Respondent.

No. 2615.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

March 11, 1970.

Joseph X. DuMond, Jr., Orlando, for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we review an order of the Circuit Court of Orange County which reversed a judgment of conviction in the municipal court of the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxicating beverages to the extent that defendant’s normal faculties were impaired.

The circuit court reversed the conviction and granted the defendant a new trial because it was of the opinion that the municipal court had committed error in allowing into evidence, over objection, the opinion testimony of the arresting police officer to the effect that defendant was under the influence of intoxicating beverages to the extent that his normal faculties were impaired. The transcript of the trial proceedings establishes that the arresting police officer, before expressing such opinion, described to the trial court the defendant’s acts, conduct, appearance and statements as seen and heard by the police officer. The opinion testimony by the officer was properly admitted into evidence, Cannon v. State, 1926, 91 Fla. 214, 107 So. 360, and the circuit court erred in reversing the conviction. Cf. City of Orlando v. Ford, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 661.

The writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment and mandate of the circuit court are quashed and this cause remanded to that court for entry of an order affirming the judgment of conviction.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Z:\009 5\p\Misc Corr\2016\Suspension\Application\Items for Completeness\5.02(b) Level of Benefit Accruals.docx 

Bricklayers Local 5 Suspension Application 

Section 5.02(b) Clarification 

The level of benefit accruals for the last ten years can be found in our most recent actuarial report, 

document labeled: Linked Summary 5 14.pdf on page 20.
#### Orvil SCHOONOVER, Appellant, v. William George ROSSI, a minor, Mabel King, Guy S. Mock, Audrea Crisco Stamey, Louis E. Stamey, and Government Employees Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees. Orvil SCHOONOVER, Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, William George Rossi, a minor, Mabel King, Guy S. Mock, Audrea Crisco Stamey, and Louis E. Stamey, Appellees.

Nos. 70-672, 70-792.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM. .

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Coachmen Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, Joseph P. Tomczak, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
          and for the period(s) covered in the Report.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | By: /s/  Joseph P. Tomczak                          
| | Joseph P. Tomczak                                   
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 5, 2004
**Agenda for the Public Meeting on the Draft 2013 Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small**  **Vessel General Permit (sVGP)** EPA East Room 1153 1201 Constitution Ave NW Washington DC 20004
**Wednesday, January 11, 2012** 9:10

– 9: 25 Opening Remarks (Deborah Nagle) 9:25

– 10:10 Overview of the Draft 2013 VGP (Ryan Albert) 10:10

– 10:40 Overview of the Draft 2013 sVGP (Robin Danesi) 10:40

– 11:00 Break 11:00

– 12:30 Public Comments 12:30

– 1:30 Lunch 1:30

– 3:30 Public Comments 3:30

– 3:40 Break 3:40

– 5:00 Public Comments

***If you would like to speak today, please register at the door.***
*** Meeting will end once all comments have been heard***List of Attendees at the January 11, 2012 Public Hearing on the Draft 2013 Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP)
**# Name**  **Affiliation Provided Oral**  **Comment?** 1 Mark Doherty ECM Maritime Services No 2 Mario Tamburri University of Maryland/MERC No 3 Chris Wholley Vickers Oils No 4 Charles J. Dorchnk American Bureau of Shipping No 5 Angel Mascoso American Bureau of Shipping No 6 Peter McNulty NEI Treatment Systems No 7 Stefanie Moreland Office if Senator Murkowski No 8 Barbra Spangler Embassy of Canada No 9 Marvourneen Dolor SL S DC No 10 Rich Everett USCG No 11 Jennifer Wilk Passenger Vessel Association Yes 12 Ed Welch Passenger Vessel Association Yes 13 Colin Henein Transport Canada No 14 Brittany Meyer American Waterway Operators No 15 John Morris USCG No 16 Douglas Schneider World Shipping Council Yes 17 Jesse W. Senkel Herbert Engineering Co. No 18 Garrett Billemeyer Relko No 19 John Hopewell American Coatings Association Yes 20 Marie Hobson American Coatings Association No 21 Dawn Champney Water and Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association No 22 Drew Minkiewicz KDW No 23 Michaela Noble MARAD No 24 Scott Glover SMC1976 Inc No 25 Lou Mazzarone Compass Water Solutions No 26 Kathy

Metcalf CSA No 27 Pex J. Langenberg Netherland Embassy No 28 Kevin Ferrie USCG No 29 Mehieen Imgiaz Canadian Embass y No 30 Dan Grochowalski Canadian Embass y No31 Jennifer

Carpenter American Waterway Operators Yes 32 Brian Peter APLMaritime No 33 Christine Mataya Booz Allen Hamilton No 34 Caitly

n Stewart American Waterway Operators No 35 Sarah Branch Offshore Marine Service Assn Yes 36 Arild Wegener Norwe gian Embassy No 37 Jon Stewart International Maritime Tech Yes 38 Henrik D Madsen Danish Embassy No 39 Andrew Newhart K&L Gates No 40 Noyle Harding Havtech No