Redland Brick July 14, 2004 The purpose

of this test program

is to quantify

the emissions

from the exhaust

of the limestone

absorber

that controls

emissions

from the natural

gas fired brick kiln. Testing

was for hydrogen

chloride,

hydrogen

fluoride

and sulfur dioxide. The test results indicate

that emissions

of hydrogen

fluoride

exceeded

the allowable emission

limit. Sulfur dioxide

and hydrogen

chloride

are below the allowable emission

limit. The attached

tables present

the test results and operating

conditions

during the test program.Method/Component Method 2 Flowrate Table 3-2 Summary of Results Redland Brick, Inc. KF Brick Plant South Windsor,

CT 14 July 2004 Units dscfrn Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 18426 18122

17969

18198

Method 8 Sulfur Dioxide Method 26 HC1HF %C02 pounds per hour pounds per hour pounds per hour

18.51.5
6.68
2.08 4.69

18:•t

18.5

18.5 1.6 1.5

1.6

7.91

2.395.28 7.93

2.20 5.11

dscfm dry standard cubic feet per minute (68°F and 29.92 inches Hg) 7.31

2.22 5.03

547-0401 Redland Brick report 4 6am/•ir.¢om3.0 SUMMARY

AND DISCUSION

OF RESULTS 3.1 Objectives

and Test Matrix The purpose

of this test program

was to quantify

air emissions

from the KF brick manufacturing plant while firing natural gas and to compare

these emissions

data to applicable emission

limits as provided

for in the CTDEP

air permit.

Emission

testing was conducted in accordance

with the EPA approved

test procedures.

Three emissions

tests were conducted for each parameter,

with the average

result of the three tests used to determine compliance. Table 3-1 lists the emission

limits from the parameters

measured,

the EPA reference methods

used, and the sampling

times for each test.

Parameter EPA Natural Gas

Test Methods Sulfur Dioxide

Method 8 Method 26 Method 26 Method 3 lbs/hr pounds per hour Hydrogen Fluoride Hydrogen Chloride Oxygen/ Carbon Dioxide Table 3-1 Air Emissions

Test Program Redland Brick, Inc. KF Plant South Windsor,

Connecticut Sample Times (min.) Emission Limits

Analytical Laboratory

Number

of Runs 3 + 1 blank 60 13.2 lbs/hr

PSC 60 2.35 lbs/hr

PSC

3 + 1 blank 60 2.85 lbs/hr

PSC

3 + 1 blank 60 NA

GamAir

3

3.2 Field Test Changes

and Problems There were no changes

to the original

test protocol,

testing proceeded

without

incident. 3.3 Summary

of Test Results Results from this compliance

t6st program

are summarized

in Table 3-2 and detailed

in Appendix B. The sulfur dioxide emissions,

(expressed

as SO2), averaged

7.3 pounds per hour (lbs/hr) which are 55.3 percent of the permit limit and are in compliance

with the CTDEP regulations. Hydtogen

chloride

(HC1) tests averaged

2.22 pounds per hour, are 94.5 percent of the permit limit, and also are in compliance

with CTDEP

regulations.

The hydrogen fluoride (HF) runs averaged

5.03 pounds per hour which exceed the permit limit of 2.85 pounds per hour.

547-0401 Redland Brick report 3 6am/•,ir.¢omEMISSION TEST RESULTS Audited by:Carl S. Ekroth TEST NO. 2

3 LOCATION Absorber

Absorber

Absorber FIRM Redland Brick Redland Brick Redland Brick TIM E 1205-1308

1330-1435

1452-1555 DATE 38182

38182

38182 ITT NO. 204027

204027

204027 COMPOUND H2SO4

H2SO4

H2SO4 ALLOWABLE LEAK RATE CFM

0.020

0.020

0.020 CORRECT FOR EXCESSIVE

LEAK NO

NO

NO S,•,.MPLE VOLUME CUB!C FEET

45.60!

47.99!

47.773 ISOKINETIC RATIO PERCENT

91.7

96.8

96.5 ENGLISH UNITS SAMPLE VOLUME,

DRY MOISTURE MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GA• EXCESS AIR Average

STACK VELOCITY VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE,

ACTUAL VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE,DRY

STD CONCENTRATION, ACTUAL CONCENTRATION, DRY, STD CONCENTRATION

DSCF

43.77

45.43

44.93

44.71 PERCENT 6.9

6.6

7.4

7.0 Ib/Ib-mole 28.22

28.27

28.17

28.22 PERCENT 706.1

676.5

706.1

696.2

CONC. @ 12% CO2 CONC. @ 12% CO2 CONC. @ 12% CO2 (FROM PPM)

FPM

2620

2600

2630

2617 ACFM 31500

31300

31700

31500 DSCFM 18384

18089

17968

18147

CONC. @ 7% 02 CONC. @ 7% 02 CONC. @ 7% 02 (FROM PPM) CONC. @ 50% EA CONC. GAS WEIGHT

@ 50% EA

grains/acf

2.47E-02

2.94E-02

2.92E-02

2.78E-02 grains/DSCF 4.231E-02

5.095 E-02 5.152E-02

4.83E-02 Ib/DSCF 6.05E-06

7.28E-06

7.36E-06

6.90E-06 gr/DSCF 3.38E-01

3.82E-01

4.12E-01 ppmdv #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0! ppmdv 0

0

0

F-FACTOR gr/DSCF

0.2450

0.2833

0.2984 ppmdv #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0! ppmdv 0

0

0.

EMISSION RATE EMISSION RATE (FROM PPM)

gr/DSCF

0.2274

0.2638

0.2769 Ib/1000 Ib

0.4308

0.4996

0.5246

EMISSIONS EMISSIONS (FROM PPM)

DSCF/MMBTU

9199

9199

9199 Ib/hr 6.67E+00

7.90E+00

7.94E+00 Ib/hr 0.00

0.00

0.00 Ib/MMBTU 4.843E-01

5.599E-01

5.897E-01 Ib/MMBTU 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

7.50E+00

CONC. @ 7%02 mg/dscm

560.72

648.30

682.82EMISSION TEST DATA Audited by:Carl S. Ekroth TEST NO. 2

3 LOCATION Absorber

Absorber

Absorber FIRM Redland Brick Redland Brick Redland Brick TI ME 1205-1308

1330-1435

1452-1555 DATE 07/14/04

07/14/04

07/14/04 ITT NO. 204027

204027

204027 COMPOUND H2SO4

H2SO4

H2SO4

Average EMISSION LIMIT Ib/hr

13.2

13.2

13.2 FINAL LEAK RATE CFM

0.007

0

0 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE in. HG

29.79

29.8

29.8

29.80 STACK AREA SQUARE

FI=FT

!_•04

!2_04

!2.04 NOZZLE DIAMETER INCHES

0,309

0.309

0.309 SAMPLING TIME MINUTES

60

60

60 DRY GAS METER CAL FACTOR

[Y] 0.991

0,991

0,991 PITOT COEFFICIENT 0,84

0,84

0,84 AVG SQUARE

ROOT OF DELTA P

INCHES H20

0.609

0,6018

0,604

0,60 AVG DELTA H INCHES H20

1.86

2,07

2,065

2,00 AVG METER TEMP DEGREES

F

85.3

93,4

97

91,90 STATIC PRESSURE INCHES H20

0,31

0,31

0.3

0.31 AVG STACK TEMP DEGREES

F

379,2

390,7

400

389,97 SAMPLE VOLUME CUBIC FEET

45.601

47,991

47,773

47.12 VOL. OF LIGUID IMPINGERS MILLITERS

69

68

76

71,00 VOL, OF LIGUID SILICA GEL

GRAMS #DIV/0! ***STACK GAS ANALYSIS*** CO2 PERCENT

1.5

1.6

1.5

1.53 02 PERCENT

18.5

18.4

18.5

18.47 CO PERCENT N2 PERCENT

80.0

80.0

80.0

80.00 FUEL FACTOR Fo SAMPLE ANALYSIS*** TOTAL CATCH CONCENTRATION

OF COMPOUND MOLECULAR WEIGHT

OF COMPOUN[

MILIGRAMS PPM g/g-MOLE

120

150

150

140.00

FUEL ANALYSIS*** TYPE OF FUEL F-FACTOR PERCENT HYDROGEN

IN FUEL PERCENT CARBON

IN FUEL PERCENT SULFUR IN FUEL PERCENT NITROGEN

IN FUEL PERCENT OXYGEN

IN FUEL GROSS CALORIC

VALUE OF FUEL

DSCF/MMBTU %H

13.35

13.35

13.35 %C 86.65

86.65

86.65 %S 0.0062

0.0062

0.0062 %N 0.1

0.1

0.1 %0 0.1

0.1

0.1 BTU/LB 19692

19692

19692Gammie Air Monitoring, LLC 28 Canton Road West Simsbury,

CT 860-658-4929 06092 Fax 860-658-2223

20 August 2004 Mr. Mark Algier State of Connecticut Department of Environmental

Protection Bureau of Air Management/E&E 79 Elm •*-oo* RECEIVED

Hartford, CT 06106-5127
Re: Redland

Brick, Inc. KF Plant Air Emissions

Test Report GamAir Project No.: 547-0401
Dear Mr. Algier: Please find enclosed

a copy of the, "Compliance

Test Report, Redland

Brick, Inc., KF Plant, South Windsor,

Connecticut",

dated August 2004. This copy can be placed in the three ring notebook previously

sent with the test protocol. Please do not hesitate

to contact me if you have any questions.

Thank you, Gammie Air Monitoring,

LLC Leigh A. Gammie Program Manager

cc. Mr. S. Gog!ick,

KF Mr. B. Miller, Redland

cmd: 547-0401 KF Plant reportSTATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

September 13, 2004 Leigh A. Gammie Program Manager Gammie Air Monitoring,

LLC. 28 Canton Road West Simsbury,

Connecticut

06092 Dear Mr. Gammie, Re: GamAir

Project no.: 547-0401 The test report for sampling

emissions

from a tunnel kiln/oxidizer

that is owned and operated

by Redland Brick, Inc. and located in South Windsor,

Connecticut,

has been reviewed.

The emission values specified

are considered

to be representative

of the actual emissions. The results have been forwarded

to our Compliance

Analysis

Division.

Final approval

of the test report is dependent

upon their review and approval

of operating

parameters

incurred

during the test program.

Redland

Brick will be notified

if further regulatory

action is to be taken. If you have any questions

regarding

this letter, please do not hesitate

to contact Carl S. Ekroth at (860) 424-3894.

Acting Director

cc: Mr. Stan Goglick,

Redland

Brick, Inc. Steve Anderson,

Compliance

Analysis • File #204027

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street

Hartford, CT 06106- 5127 An Equal Opportunity

Employer• esinctudin

cover•e•t

CC:

comment Ptease [• Urgent

[• For your review

•] l•eply AE.,A'P

I..J REMARKS:Compliance Test

Report D,•rll=nri Rriri•_

T_n_¢. KF Plant South Windsor, Connecticut

Prepared for: Mr. Stan

Goglick Redland Brick,

Inc.
Prepared by:
Mr. Leigh

A. Gammie Gammie Air Monitoring,

LLC August 2004 GamAir Project

No.:

547-0401Table of Contents Section 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION

.................................................................................................................................. 1.1 Summary

of Test Program

........................................................................................................... 1.2 Key Personnel

................................................................................................................................ 2.0 SOURCE

AND SAMLING

LOCATION

DESCRIPTION 2 2.1 Process Description

....................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Flue Gas Sampling

Locations

....................................................................................................... 9_ 3.0 SUMMARY

AND DISCUSION

OF RESULTS -• 3
3.2 Field Test Changes and Problems

................................................................................................ 3 33 Summary

of Test Results
............................................................................................................... 3 4.0 SAMPLING

AND ANALYTICAL

METHODOLOGY 5 4.1 Volumetric

Flow Rate Tests

......................................................................................................... 5 4• Sulfur Dioxide Outlet Tests

............................................................................................................ 6 4.3 Hydrogen

Chloride/Hydrogen

Fluoride Outlet Tests 6 5.0 QUALITY

ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

PROCEDURES 8 5.15.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.25.3 QC Procedures

.............................................................................................................................. 8 Equipment Calibrations 8 Analytical Quality Control Procedures 8 Calculations Quality Control Procedures 8 QA Audits
...................................................................................................................................... 9 QA/QC Checks of Data Reduction 9 Appendix A Figures

and Diagrams Appendix B Results

and Calculations Appendix C Field Data Sheets Appendix D Process

Monitoring

Data Appendix E Laboratory

Analytical

Data Appendix F Equipment

Calibrations

547-0401 Redland Brick report GamAir.com1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Summary

of Test Program Gammie Air Monitoring,

LLC (GamAir)

was retained

by Redland

Brick, Inc. to perform

a compliance air emissions

testing program

on the brick kiln exhaust

stack at the KF Plant located in South Windsor,

Connecticut.

Testing occurred

on the exhaust of the limestone absorber control device while firing natural gas. The purpose

of this test program

was to quantify the controlled

emissions

from the brick kiln at the KF facility.

This source was identified by the CTDEP

as Town No. 169, Premise

No. 005, Permit No. 0032, and Stack No. 20. The emission

limits were as follows. Hydrogen Fluoride

less than 2.35 pounds per hour Sulfur Dioxide

(expressed

as SO2) less than 13.2 pounds per hour Controlled air emissions

of hydrogen

chloride

(HC1), hydrogen

fluoride,

(HF), and sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon dioxide

(CO2), and oxygen (02) were measured

at the absorber

outlet stack. The air emission

tests were carried out in conformance

with the CTDEP

guidelines

for source emission testing and applicable

test methodologies

as published

in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60, Appendix

A (40CFR60).

This test program

was conducted

during a single field effort. GamAir

was responsible

for sampling

and analyzing

all air emissions.

KF personnel were responsible

for operating

the brick manufacturing

line at normal load conditions and collecting

all process data.
1.2 Key Personnel The following

is a list of key individuals

who were responsible

for the organization

of this test program.Mr. Barry Miller Mr. Stan Goglick Mr. Rick Pirolli Mr. Carl Ekroth Ms. Ancy Sebastian Mr. Jim Kenny Mr. Leigh Gammie

Redland

Brick, Inc. KF Plant CTDEP CTDEP PSC Analytical

Services,

Inc. EHL GamAir

(301) 223-7700 (860) 528-1311 (860) 424-4152 (860) 424-3894 (905) 332-8788 (860) 635-6475 (860) 658-4929

547-0401 Redland Brick report GamAir.com2.0 SOURCE

AND SAMLING

LOCATION

DESCRIPTION 2.1 Process

Description Redland Brick Inc., KF Plant (KF) operates

a brick manufacturing

process which utilizes a natural gas-fired

tunnel kiln to dry and fire the bricks. The kiln is permitted

to process 21.6 tons per hour of unfired bricks, (green weight).

The maximum

fuel-firing

rate was 25MMBtu/hr (25,000 cubic feet/hour).

The maximum

kiln temperature

was 2100 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Unfired

bricks vary in weight from four to 6.2 pounds each. The maximum daily push rate through

the kiln is fifteen (15) cars. For this test program

the push rate was 7.5 cars per day which equates to 11.7 green tons per hour. Emissions generated

from the tunnel kiln were controlled

by a BACT Engineering, Inc./Hellmich GmbH & Co. dry cascade

absorber.

The absorber

pressure

drop operated

at a range between

2.5 to 3.0 inches of water column. 2.2 Flue Gas Sampling

Locations Outlet flue gas sampling

occurred

after the dry absorber

in a vertical

steel stack with an inside diameter (i.d.) of 47 inches. Two test ports were located 90 degrees

apart. The sample ports

were 8.9 duct diameters

(420 inches) downstream

and 6.4 duct diameters

(300 inches) upstream to their respective

flow disturbances.

In accordance

with EPA Method

1, twelve traverse points (6 per port) were used for isokinetic

sampling.

The individual

traverse

point locations and stack schematic

are shown in Appendix

A.

547-0401 Redland Brick report 2 GamAir.com3.0 SUMMARY

AND DISCUSION

OF RESULTS 3.1 Objectives

and Test Matrix The purpose

of this test program

was to quantify

air emissions

from the KF brick manufacturing plant while firing natural gas and to compare

these emissions

data to applicable emission

limits as provided

for in the CTDEP

air permit.

Emission

testing was conducted in accordance

with the EPA approved

test procedures.

Three emissions

tests were conducted for each parameter,

with the average

result of the three tests used to determine compliance. Table 3-1 lists the emission

limits from the parameters

measured,

the EPA reference methods

used, and the sampling

times for each test.

Parameter Natural Gas

EPA Test Methods Hydrogen Fluoride Hydrogen Chloride Oxygen/ Carbon Dioxide lbs/hr pounds per hour Table 3-1 Air Emissions

Test Program Redland Brick, Inc. KF Plant South Windsorr

Connecticut Sample Times (min.) 60 Emission Limits

Analytical Laboratory

Number

of Runs
Sulfur Dioxide

Method 8 13.2 lbs/hr

PSC

3 + 1 blank Method 26

60

2.35 lbs/hr

PSC

3 + 1 blank Method 26

60

2.85 lbs/hr

PSC

3 + 1 blank NA GamAir

3 Method 3

60

3.2 Field Test Changes

and Problems There were no changes

to the original

test protocol,

testing proceeded

without

incident. 3.3 Summary

of Test Results Results from this compliance

t•st program

are summarized

in Table 3-2 and detailed

in Appendix B. The sulfur dioxide emissions,

(expressed

as SO2), averaged

7.3 pounds per hour (lbs/hr) which are 55.3 percent of the permit limit and are in compliance

with the CTDEP regulations. Hydrogen

chloride

(HC1) tests averaged

2.22 pounds per hour, are 9.4..___5•grcent of the permit limit, and also are in compliance

with CTDEP

regulations.

The hydrogen fluoride (HF) runs averaged

5.03 pounds per hour which exceed the permit limit of 2.85 •, pounds per hour.

547-0401 Redland Brick report 3 6am/•ir.¢oraMethod/Component Method 2 Flowrate Method 3A O_9/CO•

Method 8 Sulfur Dioxide Method 26 HC1HF Table 3-2 Summary of Results Redland Brick, Inc. KF Brick Plant South Windsor,

CT 14 July 2004 Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average dscfrn 18426

18122

17969

18198 % O2

18.5

18.4

18.5

18.5 %CO:• 1.5

1.6

1.5

1.6 pounds per hour

6.68

7.91

7.93

7.31 pounds per hour

2.08

2.39

2.20

2.22 pounds per hour

4.69

5.28

5.11

5.03

dscfm dry standard cubic feet per minute (68°F and 29.92 inches Hg)

547-0401 Redland Brick report 4 GamAir.¢om4.0 SAMPIJNG

AND ANALYTICAL

METHODOLOGY

The following

EPA test methods

were utilized during this emissions

test program:
EPA Method

1 EPA Method

2 EPA Method

3 EPA Method

4 EPA Met_hod

8 EPA Method

26 Sample and velocity

traverses

for stationary

sources Determination of stack gas velocity

and volumetric

flow rate (type S Pitot tube) Determination

of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations

in emissions from stationary

sources

(Orsat analyzer

procedure) Determination of moisture

content in stack gases Determination of sulfur dioxide emissions

from stationary

sources Determination of Hydrogen

Halide and Halogen

Emissions

from Stationary Sources

Non-Isokinetic

Method The following

sections

describe

the sampling

and analytical

procedures

utilized during the emissions testing.

All tests were performed

in triplicate.

All sampling

and analytical procedure followed

those outlined

in 40CFR60,

Appendix

A. 4.1 Volumetric

Flow Rate Tests The volumetric

flowrate

of the flue gas at the stack test location

was determined

using EPA Methods 1-4. In accordance

with EPA Method

1 traverse

points were utilized for flue gas velocity measurements

and isokinetic

sampling.

The locations

of the traverse

points, as determined by EPA Method

1, are listed in Appendix

A. Flue gas velocity

measurements

were taken at each traverse

point during each test run using an S-type Pitot tube and an inclined water manometer

in accordance

with EPA Method

2. Stack temperature measurements were taken at each traverse

point using a Type-K

thermocouple

and digital temperature readout.

The stack static pressure

was also measured

during each test run using the Pitot tube and manometer

setup. Pitot tube leak checks were performed

before and after each test run in accordance

with EPA Method

2. The dry molecular

weight of the outlet flue gases was determined

by measuring

the oxygen (02) and carbon dioxide

(CO2) concentrations

using the integrated

bag sampling

method followed by analysis

with an Orsat analyzer.

An integrated

15 liter Tedlar bag was collected simultaneously with the EPA Method

8 sampling

train. Carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations were determined

from integrated

gaseous

samples

collected

during each test

run using the sample train described

in EPA Method

3. The flue gas moisture

content was determined from the back half moisture

catches of the isokinetic

sampling

train during the emissions testing in accordance

with EPA Method

4. The moisture

content of the flue gas
was calculated

as the ratio of the moisture

catch corrected

to standard

conditions

to the sum of the dry sample, volume and the moisture

catch, both corrected

to standard

conditions. Calculated moisture

contents,

which exceed the saturation

moisture

at the average

duct temperature, would be defaulted

to the saturation

moisture.

547-0401 Redland Brick report 5 ¢;amAir.com4.2 Sulfur Dioxide

Outlet Tests Triplicate isokinetic

sulfur dioxide tests were performed

on the absorber

outlet exhaust

stack. Each test was 60 minutes

in duration

and was conducted

in accordance

with EPA Method

8. The EPA Method

8 sampling

train is depicted

in Appendix

A. The sampling

train was similar to the Method

5 train with the exception

of 1) a glass wool filter was placed between

the first and second impinger

2) the heated filter between

the probe and impingers

was removed,

and 3) the impinger

contents

were replaced

with isopropanol

(IPA) and hydrogen

peroxide.

The sample train probe and heater box were heated to 248°F +/-25°F degrees to prevent moisture condensation. The first impinger

contained

100ml of 80% isopropanol,

100 ml of 3% hydrogen peroxide

was contained

in both the second and third impinger,

while 250 grams of

_:,: 1.•A •., •,• • •h •mn•n,,•r

t• l•n,•,qc ,•Ut •nv remaining

moisture

before reaching the sampling

pump. The impinger

outlet temperature

was maintained

below 68°F during sampling. Before and after each test run the sampling

train was leak checked

to ensure no leakage greater than 0.2 cubic feet per minute.

The sampling

train operating

parameters

was recorded at each traverse

point on preprinted

data sheets as shown in Appendix

C. After the post test leak check, the sampling

train was inspected

and then moved to the clean up area. A fifteen (15) purge of clean ambient

air was then run at the average

flow rate used during the test. Upon completion,

the sampling

train was recovered

as follows: Container No. 1 Weighed

the first impinger

contents

to the nearest 0.5 gram and recorded its weight.

Rinsed the nozzle, probe, filter housing,

first impinger,

and connecting glassware

with IPA. Placed the glass wool filter in with the IPA rinses, sealed container,

and marked

level of liquid. Container No. 2 Weighed

second and third impingers

for moisture

gain to the nearest 0.5 grams. Transfer

solutions

from second and third impingers

to a 1000ml graduated cylinder.

All connecting

glassware

from the second impinger

to the third impinger are then rinsed twice with distilled

water. Dilute to a volume of 1000 ml with DI water, mark liquid level and label container. Container No. 3 Weighed

contents

of silica gel impinger

to nearest 0.5 grams and add figure to total moisture

gain, then discard. Container No. 1 did not get analyzed

as sulfuric

acid was not a requirement

for this test program. Container

No. 2 was then shipped

to a contract

laboratory

for sulfur dioxide analysis. Sulfur dioxide analysis

from container

No. 2 consisted

of using a titration

method with 2 to 4 drops of thorin indicator,

titrating

to a pink endpoint

using 0.010 N barium perchlorate. This analysis

was duplicated

per the method.

A field blank was also provided

to the laboratory

for analysis.
4.3 Hydrogen

Chloride/Hydrogen Fluoride

Outlet Tests Triplicate hydrogen

chloride

(HC1) and hydrogen

fluoride

(HF) tests were performed

at the absorber outlet stack simulfaneously

with the EPA Method

8 testing.

Each test was 60 minutes in duration

and was conducted

in accordance

with EPA Method

26. The HC1/HF

sampling

train consisted

of a flexible

heated Teflon transfer line with an in-stack
547-0401 Redland Brick report 6Teflon filter, a set of 5 glass mini impingers

connected

in series contained

in an ice bath, a leakless vacuum

pump, a calibrated

rotometer,

and a calibrated

dry gas meter. The sample probe was maintained

at a temperature

between

248°F and 275°F to prevent moisture condensation. A cyclone

was not used with the GamAir

sampling

train. The first two impingers each contained

15 milliliters

(ml) of 0.1N H2SO4 for the collection

of HC1 and HF, the third and fourth impingers

each contained

15 ml of 0.1N NaOH, and the fifth impinger contained a known quantity

of silica gel. The impinger

outlet temperature

was maintained below 68°F during sampling.

Sampling

was performed

at a constant

rate of 2.0 liters per minute. Before and after each test run the sampling

train was leak checked

to ensure no leakage greater than 40 cubic centimeters

per minute.

The sampling

train operating

parameters

were recorded at each traverse

point on prepnnte•a

•aata •cct• •t• •l•vw,• 1,, •r,r,,•,u,.• sampling train components

were then moved to the clean up area. The following

is a description of the sample recovery

procedure.
Container No. 1 emptied

contents

of impingers

1 & 2 and saved. Duplicate deionized water rinses of impingers

1 & 2. Container No. 2 discarded. measured

moisture

contained

in impinger

3, 4, and 5 then
Container No. 3 rinse water added.

0.1 N H2SO4 reagent blank (30 ml) with corresponding

Container No. 4 deionized

water reagent blank. Sample containers

1, 3 and 4 were shipped

to a contract

laboratory

for HC1 and HF analysis. Sample preparation

and analysis

consisted

of properly

preparing

the ion chromatograph

(IC). The IC conditions

depended

upon analytical

column type and whether

suppressed

or nonsuppressed IC was used. The three individual

samples

(Containers

1, 3, & 4) were then analyzed separately.

The reagent blanks (Containers

3 and 4) were also analyzed

separately. The reagent blank consisted

of those solutions

used in the collection

of HC1/HF,

these blanks did not come in contact with any portion of the sampling

trains as associated

with a field train blank.

547-0401 Redland Brick report 7 I•llla•,i r.¢Ol•!5.0 QUALITY

ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

PROCEDURES 5.1 QC Procedures Specific quality control (QC) procedures

were followed

to ensure the continuous

production of useful and valid data throughout

the course of this test program.

The QC checks and procedures described

in this section represent

an integral part of the overall sampling

and analytical scheme.

Strict adherence

to prescribed

procedures

is quite often the most applicable QC check. A discussion

of both the sampling

and analytical

QC checks that were utilized during this program

are presented

below. 5.1.1 Equipment

Calibrations Prior to the start of the test program

the CTDEP

received

copies of all sampling

equipment calibrations as described

in their stack testing guidelines. Emissions sampling

equipment

requiring

calibration

includes

sampling

nozzles,

Pitot tubes, pressure gauges, thermometers,

dry gas meters, and barometer.

Post test calibration

of the dry gas meters were all within their acceptable

limit (Y 1.00 +/- 0.05).
5.1.2 Analytical

Quality

Control

Procedures All analyses

for this program

were performed

using accepted

laboratory

procedures

in accordance with the specified

analytical

protocols.

Adherence

to prescribed

QC procedures for the EPA methods

used for this test program

ensured

data of consistent

and measurable quality. Analytical

QC focused

on the use of control standards

to provide

a measure

of analytical precision

and accuracy.

The SO2 samples

were analyzed

following

the procedures of EPA Method

8; HC1 and HF samples

were analyzed

in accordance

with EPA Method

26. Field blanks and laboratory

blanks were used to check for contamination.

Also, specific acceptance criteria defined below for various analytical

operations,

including

calibrations, control standard

analyses,

drift checks, blanks, etc. were within the acceptable

limits of EPA Methods 8 and 26.

Test Method

and QC Sample EPA Method

8 Duplicate Analysis Blanks Table 5-1 Quality' Control

Samples Criteria

QC Limits Met

Duplicate Analysis less than 1% or 0.2 ml At or below detection

limit YesYes Sampling Isokinetics 90% to 110% Yes Blanks At or below detection

limit Yes EPA Method

26 Yes percent difference

less than 5% 5.1.3 Calculations

Quality

Control

Procedures Calculations for determining

flow rates, moisture

contents,

isokinetics,

particulate

and
547-0401 Redland Brick report 8 Gam/•ir.¢omgaseous concentrations

were made using a computer

program

developed

by GamAir.

This program utilizes the calculation

procedures

and equations

specified

in EPA Methods

2, 4, and 5. The program

has been successfully

used for numerous

test efforts and has been validated by independent

performance

audits. Sample calculations

were performed

by the software program and a definition

of terms is provided

in the final report. Field data was transported

to the software

directly

from the data sheets. All tests were performed

within the acceptable isokinetic range of 90% to 110%. 5.2 QA Audits There were no audits for this test program. 5.3 QA/QC

Checks

of Data Reduction The project manage•:

ran an independent

check (using a validated

computer

program)

of the calculations with predetermined

data before the field test. This ensured

that calculations

done in the field were accurate.

The project manager

also conducted

a spot check onsite to assure that data was recorded

accurately.

547-0401 Redland Brick report 9 GamAir.comSummary of Sulphur Dioxide Emissions KF Brick Exhaust Stack South Windsor, Connecticut

RUN NUMBER: DATE: TIME: M8-1 7/14/04 1205-1308

M8-2 7/14/04 1330-1425

M8-3 7114/04 1452-1555

Average

REQUIRED INPUT DATA BAROMETRIC PRESSURE,

(" Hg) AREA OF STACK, (ft 2) NOZZLE DIAMETER,

(inches) TOTAL SAMPLE TIME, (minutes) U•4• Y •,,,,•/c• M •1"•. PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT AVERAGE VELOCITY

PRESSURE

(SQ. RT.), (" H20) AVG. ORIFICE PRESSURE

DIFFERENTIAL,

(" H20) AVG. DRY GAS METER TEMPERATURE,

(°F) STACK STATIC PRESS., (" AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE,

(°F) VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLED, TOTAL MOISTURE

COLLECTED,

(ml) CO2 IN STACK GAS, (%) O2 IN STACK GAS, (%) CO IN STACK GAS, (%) N= IN STACK GAS, (%)
TOTAL SULPHUR DIOXIDE COLLECTED,

(mg)

29.79

29.80

29.80

29.80 12.040 12.040

12.040

12.04 0.309 0.309

0.309

0.309 60 60

60

60.0 09•1 0.991

0.991

0.99 0.84 0.84

0.84

0.84 0.6093 0.6018

0.6040

0.61 1.860 2.060

2.060

1.96 85 93

97

89.0 0.31 0.31

0.30

0.31 379 391

400

385.0 45.601 47.991

47.773

46.796 69.0 68.0

76.0

68.5 1.5 1.6

1.5

1.6 18.5 18.4

18.5

18.5 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0 80.0 80.0

80.0

80.0
120.0 150.0

150.0

135.0

HYDROGEN IN FUEL, (%) CARBON IN FUEL, (%) SULFUR IN FUEL, (%) NITROGEN IN FUEL, (%) OXYGEN IN FUEL, (%) GCV, (Btu/Ib) CALCULATED

DATA VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED,

(dscf) MOISTURE IN STACK GAS, (%) STACK GAS WET MOLECULAR

WEIGHT, (Ibllb-mole) EXCESS AIR, (%) STACK GAS VELOCITY,

(fpm) ACTUAL VOLUMETRIC

FLOWRATE,

(acfm) STANDARD VOLUMETRIC

FLOWRATE,

(dscfm) ISOKINETIC, (%)

grains/actual

cubic feet micrograms/actual cubic meter grains/dry standard cubic feet milligrams/dry standard cubic meter at 7% O2 pounds/hour grains/dry standard cubic feet at 12% CO2 dry standard cubic feet/million Btu (F-Factor) pounds/million Btu

43.79

45.46

44.93

44.36 6.90 6.58

7.38

7.14 28.22 28.27

28.17

28.20 706.1 676.5

706.1

706,1 2621.58 2605.16

2633.11

2627.3 31584 31366

31703

31633.2 8426 18122

17969

18197.7 91.6 96.7

96.4

94.0 2.47E-02 2.94E-02

2.92E-02

0.0269 5.65E+04 6.73E+04

6.68E+04

61656.2 4.23E-02 5.09E-02

5.15E-02

0.0469 5.61E+02 6.49E+02

6.84E+02

622.8 6.68E+00 7.91E+00

7.93E+00

7.306 3,38E-01 3.82E-01

4.12E-01

0.375 9190 9190

9190

9190.0 4.84E-01 5.59E-01

5.89E-01

0.536

KFBRICKM8 data TSP M5Summary of Hydrogen

Fluoride Emissions Redland Brick KF Brick Plant South Windsor,

Connecticut

RUN NUMBER: DATE: TIME: M264

M26-2

M26-3 07114104 07114104

07114/04 1208-1308 1331-1431

1451-1551

Average

REQUIRED INPUT DATA TOTAL HF COLLECTED,

(mg) AVEP.•.GE DRY GAS M.FTFR TEMPERATURE.

(°F) DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION

FACTOR TOTAL SAMPLE TIME, (minutes) VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLED,

(ft 3) BAROMETRIC PRESSURE,

(" Hg) AVG. ORIFICE PRESSURE

DIFFERENTIAL,

(" H20) HF MOLECULAR

WEIGHT 8.160

8.450

9.630

8.747 80 84

88

84 0.952 0.952

0.952

0.952 60 60

60

60 4. 580

4.167

4.901

4. 549 29.79 29.80

29.80

29.80 0.00 0.00

0.00

0.00 20.00 20.00

20.00

20.00
CARBON IN FUEL, (%) SULFUR IN FUEL, (%) NITROGEN IN FUEL, (%) OXYGEN IN FUEL, (%) GCV, (BTU/Ib) 02 IN STACK GAS, (%) CO2 IN STACK GAS, (%) STANDARD VOLUMETRIC

FLOWRATE,

(dscfm) 18.5

18.4 1.5 1.6 18426 18122

18.51.5 17969

18.51.5 18172

CALCULATED DATA VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED,

(dscf) SAMPLING RATE, (liters/minute) HF CONCENTRATION,

(pounds/dscf) grams/dry standard cubic meters parts per million parts per million at 7% O2 pounds/hour

4.24

3.84

4.48

4.19 2.00 1.81

2.11

1.98 4.24E-06 4.86E-06

4.74E-06

4.61E-06 6.79E-02 7.78E-02

7.59E-02

7.39E-02 81.57 93.46

91.23

88.75 472.45 519.65

528.36

506.82 4.69E+00 5.28E+00

5.11 E+00

5.03E+00

KF Bdck hd data HF sample & lab GamAir,#m

08Summary of Hydrogen

Chloride Emissions Redland Brick KF Brick Plant South Windsor,

Connecticut

RUN NUMBER: DATE: TIME: M26-t

M26-2

M26-3 07114104 07114104

07114/04 t208-1308 1331-1431

t451-155t

Average

REQUIRED INPUT DATA TOTAL HCI COLLECTED,

(rag) AVERAGE DRY GAS METER TEMPERATURE,

(OF) DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION

FACTOR TOTAL SAMPLE TIME, (minutes) VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLED,

(ft 3) BAROMETRIC PRESSURE,

(" Hg) AVG. ORIFICE PRESSURE

DIFFERENTIAL,

(" H:•O) HCI MOLECULAR

WEIGHT 3.630

3.820

4.150

3.867 80 84

88

84 0.952 0.952

0.952

0.952 60 60

60

60 4.580 4.167

4.901

4.549 29.79 29.80

29.80

29.80 0.00 0.00

0.00

0.00 36.45 36.45

36.45

36.45
CARBON IN FUEL, (%) SULFUR IN FUEL, (%) NITROGEN IN FUEL, (%) OXYGEN IN FUEL, (%) GCV, (BTU/Ib) 02 IN STACK GAS, (%) CO2 IN STACK GAS, (%) STANDARD VOLUMETRIC

FLOWRATE,

(dscfm) 18.5

18.4

18.5

18.5 1.5 1.6

1.5

1.5 18426 18122

17969

18172

CALCULATED DATA VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED,

(dscf) SAMPLING RATE, (liters/minute) HCI CONCENTRATION,

(pounds/dscf) grams/dry standard cubic meters parts per million parts per million at 7% O2 pounds/hour

4.24

3.84

4.48

4.19 2.00 1.81

2.11

1.98 1.89E-06 2.20E-06

2.04E-06

2.04E-06 3.02E-02 3.52E-02

3.27E-02

3.27E-02 19.91 23.18

21.57

21.56 115.32 128.90

124.94

123.05 2.08E+00 2.39E+00

2.20E+00

2.22E+00

M26 sample & lab 0O9 GamAirEmission Calculation Symbols Required Input Data PBASDNTF¥CPSQRT DP DHTMPST•VM TOT VIC02O2CON2MN•=uel Analysis Innut %H

0 %C 0 %S 0 %N 0 %O 0 GCV 0
T STD

68 P STD

29.92 LP 0.001 LA 0.02 29.79

barometric pressure, (" Hg) 12.04 area of stack, (ft 2) 0.309 nozzle Diameter, (inches) 60 total sampling time, (minutes) 0.991 dry gas meter calibration factor 0.84 pilot tuba coefficient, dimensionless 0.6093 average velocity pressure (square root), (" H20) °86 average orifice pressure differential, (" H2 O) 85 average dry gas meter temperature, (•F) 0.31 stack static pressure, (" F R7• average stack _gas temDeratura, 45.601 volume of gas sampled, (ft 3) 69 total moisture collected, (ml) 1.5 CO2 in stack gas (dry basis), 18.5 O2 in stack gas (dry basis), % 0 CO in stack gas (d•/basis), % 80 N2 in stack gas (dry basis), % 120 total analyte collected, (milligrams) percent by weight of hydrogen in fuel percent by weight of carbon in fuel percent by weight of sulfur in fuel percent by weight of nitrogen in fuel percent by weight of oxygen in fuel gross calorific value of fuel, Btu/•b standard temperature, (°F) standard pressure, (" Hg) final leak rate of sampling train, (ff3/min) allowable leak rate of sampling train, (ff3/min)

I. Volume of Dr/Gas Sampled (DSCF), dr/standard

cubic feet

DSCF (VMTOT) x (Y) x [(TSTD+460)/(TM+460)]

x |(pS+DHI13.6)I20.92]

DSCF 43.79

2. Moisture In Stack Gas (%H:O), percent

% H=O

100 x [(0.04707 x VI)I [DSCF (0.04707 x VI)]

%H=0 6.90

3. Stack Gas Wet Molecular Weight (MWS), Ib/Ib-mole

MWS [(0.44 x COz) (0.28 x CO) (0.28 x N=) (0.32 x Oz)] x [1 (%H2OI100)]

(0.18 x %H=0)

MWS 28.22

4. Average Stack Gas Density (DST), pound per cubic feet

DST (0.0458) x MWS x [(pB (PS/13.6)/('rs

460)]

DST 0.0459 010Excess

Nr (EA), %

EA 100 x [(02 (0.5 x CO)) (0.264 x N2) (02 (0.5 x CO))]

EA 706.11

6. Stack Gas Velocity (FPM), feet per minute

FPM 5129.4 x CP x SQRTDP x SQRT[(TS +460)/(PB

(PS/13.6)) x MSW]

FPM 2621.584

7. Actual Volumetric Flow Rate (Q), actual cubic feet perminutaQ FPM x AS

Q 31564

8. Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (Q STD), d•y standard cubic feet per minute

QSTD Q x [1-(%HzO/100)]

x [(TSTD+ 460)/(TS +460)] x [pB+ (PS/13.6)129.92|

Q STD

18426

9. Isokinetic Factor (IK), %

IK [5.67 x (TS +460) x DSCF]/[(PB+

(PS/13.6)) x FPM x TT x (1- (%H20/100)) x (DN x 0.7854)/144]

IK 91.6

10. Actual Analyta Concentration

(C), grains per actual cubic feet

C [0.01543 x MN x ('I'STD 460) x (PB+ (PS/13.6)) x (1-(%H2OI100)]I(DSCF

x (TS+ 460) 29.92)

C 0.024683

tl. Actual Analyte Concentration

Corrected To Stack Conditions (Cd), micrograms per actual cubic meter

Cd [1000 x MN x (TSTD+460)

x (PB (PS/13.6)) x (1- (%H2OI100))]1

(0.02832 x (TS +460) x 29.92)

Cd 56486.63
Oil12.

Anslyte Concentration

Corrected To Dry Standard Conditions (Csm), milligrams/dry

standard cubic meters Anelyta Concentration

Corrected To Dry Standard Conditions (Cs), grains/dry standard cubic feet

Csm (MN/DSCF) x 35.31 Cs

0.01543 x (MN/DSCF)

Csm 96.76 mllligrams/dscm Cs

4.23E-O2 gmins/dscf

13. Analyta Emission Rata (ER), pounds per hour

ER 0.008571 x •s Q STD

ER 6.677695 pounds per hour

14. F Factor (F), DSCF per million British thermal units

F 1000000 x [(3.64x%H)+(1.53x%C)+(O.57x%S)+(O.14x%N)-(O.46x%O)]/GCV

F #DIV/01 DSCF per million Btu

15. Analyta Emission Rate (EBTU), pounds per million Btu

EBTU 0.0001429 x Cs x F x (20.9/(20.9- 02))

EBTU #OIV/01 pounds/million

BTU

16. Anelyta ConcentraUon

Corrected to Dry Standard Conditions and 12% CO= (Cs 12%CO=), milligrams/dscm

at 12% CO=
Csm12%CO2 Csm x (12 CO2)
Csm12%CO2 774.0791 mg/dscm @ 12% CO2

17. Analyte Concentration

Corrected to Dry Standard Conditions and 7% O= (Cs •7%O=), mg/dscm at 7% O2 Csm7%02 Csm x [(20.9 7.0) (20.9 02)]
Csm7%O2 560.40 mg/dscm @ 7% O2Appendix C Field Da• Sheets

54•-0401 Redland Brick report GamAir,como•t:Appendix D Process Monitoring

Data

•t7•] Redland Bfi• •rt GamAir,comFAX •s

inctudin

cover she•t

TO:

Phone 0 • <• • 2"Z 7..

[• Urgent

[• For your •vlew

[• Reply A,•AP

•' Please" commen• REMARKS:

,•,

.;,• ,•,,: ',,'..•. ,'., ,•

,•.,•, .•'

.•),1•, /,• :•.

,!,.•,,,•.,

,.,'• •.!

,• TOTAL P.g•Appendix E Labo•to• •alyflcal

DaM

547-0401 •land Brick report GamAir.©omLAB

ORA TOR Y ANAL YSIS REPORT ESIS Environmental

Health Laboratory 100 Sebethe Drive, Suite A-5 Cromwell, CT 06416 (860) 635-6475 or (g00) 243-4903
State of Connecticut

Approval #PH 0510 Lab Accreditations:

AIHA #144, AIHA ELLAP #6945

To: John Gammie Gammie Air Monitoring 28 Canton Rd.. West Simsbury,

CT 06092 Report #: C0417683 P.O. No.: 547-0401-02 547-0401 Date Received:

7/16/2004 Date Reported:

8/2/2004

Page 1 of 1 Analysis: Inorganic Acids Analytical Method: Ion Chromatography;

EPA 26 Sample Imp. Volume Number •

Component u_g M26-1 30

Hydrofluoric

Acid

8160 Hydrochloric Acid

3630
M26-2 30

Hydrofluoric

Acid

8450 Hydrochloric Acid

3820 M26-3 30

Hydrofluoric

Acid

9630 Hydrochloric Acid

4150 M26-4 Blank Hydrofluoric

Acid

<63.2 Hydrochloric Acid

<61.7

Detection Limit: 2.11 ug/mL Detection Limit: 2.06 ug/mL
Samples analyzed by ion chromatography

are quantitated

by matching the retention times of sample peaks with those of known compounds.

A matching retention time is not proof of chemical identity. Concentrations reported are based on air volumes provided.

Analyst: Ben Miller Date:ESIS

Risk Control Services One of the ACE Group of Companies 100 Sebethe Drive Suite A-5 Cromwell, CT 06416 (860) 63526475;

(800) 243-4903

FAX (860) 635-6750 REQUEST FOR ANALYTICAL

SERVICES (Please-fill all blanks to help us better serve you) RUSH ,t?.leccye qall

FOR I• USE ONLY Lub R•por• No.

:-,: Und L7 SP• • •IR C? ESIS L7 Z f• C/dints
Fo• Or Co•. No.

Send INVOICE

To [A•EOUIRED] Name: Com•___ny: Company: :":

="' 7 ni 5 Mailin• Ad•dress: Ma ng Address:

: :

a+.+• •. CiW, S•te, Zip: ,,_: .•:•: .:•, ,, Phone No:

:2. ":"•;

'2 • Phone Results PO#, Ref# Of R•uiM):

.:. c. "7• %:,•:•. Accts. Payable Phone No: Fax No:

,:.., ,.:, ,.,. Acf_ts_: Payable Fax No: Emaih :;. ,,. ...... :.

,• Sampling Location: Sampling Media: Sampling Method: Colle•tor's Signature:

Media [] FaxResults I• Email Results

Product Manufactured/Service

Rendered: Collected by Date/Time Date/Time Received by: Date/Time Date/Time Received by: CHAI• OF Relinquished

by: •IJSTODVJt r Relinquished

by: Method of Shipment: • ': Authorized( nature requtrea)

NO SAM]PIE (Lab Use COI'¢I'AII•R Ouly) NO Dateg•

Sample Condition Upon Receipt: • Acceptable H Unacceptable
SAM•I.3•qG TIME ANALYSIS DESIRKD

(Recording s•mpfing date, A 3 sample minimum charge •tpplies when Location and Operation.

SAMPLING TeLl! less than 3 of each specific aual.yle is Other eompouuds present, RATE Time requited. etc.)

0iter•mtm)

Start .1•1 (mlaute•)

AIR SAMPLE VOLUME (liters)

FOR LAB NOTES ONLY:

DISTRIBUTION:

WHITE LAB COPY CANARY LAB FILE COPY PINK CUSTOMER

COPYGamAir Laboratory Submittal

Form

To: EHL From: John S. Gammie D•te: 15-Jul-04

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829Item •mAJr Project No.: 547-0401 PO # 547-0401-02

S•.,• pie Ide•tiflcation Collection

Date
M26-1 7/14/2004 VI26-2 7/14/2004 M26-3 7/i 4/2004 M26-4 b!•_nk 7/14/2004

Sample Volume initial sample
VUlUliI•

A•a;•,sis

Requested Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) and Hydrofluoric Acid (H F)
30 ml

with EPA Method 26 (ion chromato•lraphy)

Comments: Initial impinger

content was 30 ml

Lab Submittal

Form EPA M26 GamAir.comGamAir Laboratory Submittal

Form

To: PSC Anal•ical

Services,

Inc. From: Leigh Gammie Date: 15-Jul-04
Item Collection

Date GamAir Project No.: 547-0401 PO # 547-0401-01 Sample Identification • M8-1 M8-2 '• M8-4 Blank

101112131415•16171819202122232425262728293O 14-Jul-04 14-Jul-04
t A I•=l_rtA 14-Jul-04

Sample Volume

Analysis

Requested sample VO!,j..m.e 200 ml initial

Sulfur dioxide per EPA Method 8

Comments:

Leb Submittal

Form EPA M8 024 GamAir.comCertificate of Analysis

CLIENT INFORMATION Attention: CHent Name: Project: Project Desc: Leigh Gammie Gammie Air Monitoring,

LLC 547 0401

Address: 28 Canton Road West Simsbury,

CT 06092 Fax Number:

860-658-2223 Phone Number:

860-658-4929 LABORATORY

INFORMATION
Contact: Ancy Sebastian Project: AN041077 Date Received:

16-Jul-2004 Date •eported:

23-Jul-2004 Submission No.: 4G0743 Sample No.:

044438-044442

NOTES: "-' not analysed '<' less than Method Detection Limit (MDL) 'NA no data available LOQ can by determined for aH analytes by multiplying

the appropriate

MDL X 3.J3 Solids data is based on dry weight except for biota analyses. Organic analyses are not corrected for extraction recovery standards except for isotope dilution methods, (i.e. CARB 429 PAIl, all PCDDIF and DBDIDBF analyses) The enclosed copy of the Chain of Custody Record may contain information

necessary for the interpretation of the data.

Methods used by PSC Analytical

Services are based upon those found in 'Standard Methods for the Examination

of Water and Wastewater',

Twentieth Edition. Other methods are based on the principles of MISA or EPA methodologies. New York State: ELAP Identification

Number 10756.
All work recorded herein has been done in accordance

with normal professional

standards using accepted testing methodologies, quality assurance and quality control procedures

except where otherwise agreed to by the client and testing company in writing. Any and all use of these test results shall be limited to the actual cost of the pertinent analysis done. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Your samples will be retained at PSC Analytical

Services for a period of three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract.

COMMENTS:

Page 1 of 3PASC Summary

of Analysis

Pre. Dates Page MS-3 of 3 7/28/2004
Batch Code: Impinger volume measured

Date Analysed: Date Prepared: Batch Code: Sulphur Dioxide

Date Analysed: Date Prepared: 0722BAA1 044439 04 04444004 044441 04 044442 04 04/07/22 04/07/22 0722BAA1 044438 04 044439 04 044440 04 044441 04 044442 04 04/07/22 04/07/22

PSC Submission

No: 4G0743 Client: Gammie Air Monitoring,

LLC Project: 547 0401JUL-I•-Z•t4 1- •; lb

W•L. HP•HLY It•HL NOT ZCE •0F•AM

pI•E_R • •EI_pT•_I•

•p_ANALI•I

CAL•ER•

Z CES
Attention= L•i•h Ga•uie Client= Ga=•ie

Ai• •onitoring,

L•C Re Client

Project:

54• 0401 ¥•X #: 860-6•8-2223 •hone #: 860-658-4929 PSC Pro•ecE

Manager=

were received

in good •on•itionunless

SAMPLE LISTING Philip Date ID # Sample

ID

Sampled

Received
044439 MS-Blank

SO2 044440 MS-1

SO2 044441 M8-2

SO2 044442 M8-3

S02

04/07114 041071•4 o4/o•I14 o4/o•/14

o•/o•/l• o4/o•/• o4/o7/• o•/o•/z•

Cooler Temperature

upon CommentS:

DaCe o•/o7/19 098

TOTAL P.01Appendix F Equipment Calibrations

547-0401'Redland Brick report •amAir.comPiI•t lD:

4/o

Probe P•tot

Probe

b

•• (EPA MeUlod

2)

b•_O d_>3" 1,051• < P_< 1.50D•
e >_. 8/4" f•_2"

Page ld2 d: .•. / oo e: o ,•°+8

e= •4..•"...

(eo"<e<'•oo

°) o'-'- •,•..3

(eo"<o'<

'0oo °)

e= ? "•" •'

c. D. •1 < lj3•Nozzle Set:

Nozzle No. 11912012112212312410110210310410510610710880818283848586876162
BOX 1 1-11-21-31-4 BOX 2 2-12-22-32-42-5

Nozzle Calibration

Data Date: 3/30/04

I.D. #1 •

I.D. #3 0.502 0.501

0.501 0.505 0.5G5

=• 0.357 0.3605

0.359 0.362 0.362

0.363 0.351 0.353

0.351 0.429 0.43

0.431 0.341 0.339

0.3405 0.335 0.335

0.337 0.3105 0.307

0.3105 0.3095 0.3105

0.311 0.376 0.374

0.377 0.387 0.389

0.386 0.371 0.373

0.371 0.378 0.377

0.377 0.243 0.242

0.242 0.242 0.242

0.241 0.253 0.253

0.255 0.251 0.2505

0.248 0.259 0.259

0.257 0.250 0.2505

0.250 0.254 0.254

0.254 0.255 0.254

0.254 0.183 0.183

0.183 0.183 0.185

0.183 0.175 0.174

0.176
0.251 0.249

0.248 0.246 0.248

0.249 0.502 0.503

0.501 0.491 0.489

0.488
0.188 0.186

0.187 0.258 0.257

0.2605 0.321 0.322

0.319 0.374 0.375

0.375 0.402 0,4005

0.401

Stainless Steel

By:

Avera•e 0.501 0;50_5 0.359 0.362 0.352 0.430 0.340 0.336 0.309 0.310 0.376 0.387 0.372 0.377 0.242 0.242 0.254 O.250 0.258 0.250 0.254 0.254 0.183 0.184 0.175
0.249 0.248 0.5O2 0.489 0,187 0.259 0.321 0.375 0.401 TGG

GamAirE E II

II EZ0Appendix A Fibres and Diagrams

•47• Redland Bri• report' GamAir,com50 "4O 4O

3O 24 oz" 25 A

13345?$9101112. 4

6

8

10

12 6.7 4.4

3.2

2.6

2.1 25.0 14.6

10.5

8.2

6.7 75.0 2•,lr•

3_9.4

14.6

11.8 93.3 70,4

32.3

22.6

17.7 85.4 •7.7

34.2

25.0 •5.6 80.6

65.8

35.6 89,5 77.4

64.4 96.8 85.4

75.0 91 8 82 3 97.4 88.2 93.3 97.9

34567891011|

•w••

EPA Method

26 Hydrochlodo Acid Sampling

TrainAppendix B. Results and Calculations

547•I Redia• Bri•k report