alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1693 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1693

To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2021

 Mr. Jeffries (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Armstrong, and 
  Mr. Bacon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating a Quantifiably Unjust 
Application of the Law Act'' or the ``EQUAL Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR COCAINE OFFENSES WHERE 
              THE COCAINE INVOLVED IS COCAINE BASE.

    (a) Controlled Substances Act.--The following provisions of the 
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) are repealed:
            (1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A) (21 U.S.C. 
        841(b)(1)(A)).
            (2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B) (21 U.S.C. 
        841(b)(1)(B)).
    (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act.--The following 
provisions of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 
U.S.C. 951 et seq.) are repealed:
            (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1) (21 U.S.C. 
        960(b)(1)).
            (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2) (21 U.S.C. 
        960(b)(2)).
    (c) Applicability to Pending and Past Cases.--
            (1) Pending cases.--This section, and the amendments made 
        by this section, shall apply to any sentence imposed after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, regardless of when the offense 
        was committed.
            (2) Past cases.--In the case of a defendant who, before the 
        date of enactment of this Act, was convicted or sentenced for a 
        Federal offense involving cocaine base, the sentencing court 
        may, on motion of the defendant, the Bureau of Prisons, the 
        attorney for the Government, or on its own motion, impose a 
        reduced sentence after considering the factors set forth in 
        section 3553(a) of title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

 Appendix A: Significant Comments and District Responses June 16, 2011 

 A-1 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices 

 For Proposed Amendments to Rule 4605 

APPENDIX A

 

Summary of Significant Comments 

And District Responses 

June 16, 2011 
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

 Appendix A: Significant Comments and District Responses June 16, 2011 

 A-2 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices 

 For Proposed Amendments to Rule 4605 

This page intentionally blank. 
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

 Final Staff Report: Rule 4605 June 16, 2011 

A-3 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices 

 For Proposed Amendments to Rule 4605 

APPENDIX A 

Summary of Significant Comments and District Responses for Final 

Draft Amendments to Rule 4605 dated May 19, 2011 

EPA Comments: 

No comments were received. 

ARB Comments: 

Comment: The Adhesion Promoter and Antichafe Coating category VOC limits are higher 

than limits used in South Coast AQMD. Is there a specific reason why those limits were 

not lowered? 

Response: Because of the short time period for the rule amendment process, District staff 

looked at incorporating EPA recommendations and RACT requirements only. As stated in 

the Staff Report, staff will look at the possibility of opening the rule again in the future for 

the purpose of incorporating Best Available Control Technology limits. 

Stakeholder Comments: 

No comments were received. 
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

 Final Staff Report: Rule 4605 June 16, 2011 

A-4 Final Draft Staff Report with Appendices 

 For Proposed Amendments to Rule 4605 

This page intentionally blank.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0351

Docket Number

2009-SW-049-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 64.00.05, Revision 2, dated February 

15, 2007; and 

Eurocopter ASB No. 64.00.04, Revision 2, dated February 15, 2007.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
From: "Gatlin, Jacquelin" <Jackie.Gatlin@dnr.mo.gov>

To: "'eleanor.codding@erg.com'" <eleanor.codding@erg.c om>
Date: 6/24/2010 4:54 PM Subject: OR 15133 DMRs for Springfield Sanitary Landfill

Attachments: OR 15133.pdf

Ms. Codding: Your request for records under the Su nshine Law, Chapter 610, Revised Statutes of Missou ri, received today, is attached. You requested copies of 2008 Discharge Monitoring Repor ts for the Springfield Sanitary Landfill. The Depa rtment wants disclosure of information to be the rule, not the exception. However, some r ecords are exempted from public disclosure by law o r statute. If a portion of the information that you have asked for is not available, we segreg ate the exempted records.

Please let me know if this office can be of further assistance to you. Thanks! jg

Jackie Gatlin Executive II/Records Manager Southwest Regional Office phone 417-891-4300

fax 417-891-4399 jacquelin.gatlin@dnr.mo.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6783

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STACEY LANE FISHER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (5:10-cr-00037-GEC-1; 5:12-cv-80545-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacey Lane Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stacey Lane Fisher seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Fisher has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: National  compensation survey. State and local government. Columbia, SC
SuDocs Number:[if !vml]>[endif]>L 2.121/40:C 72/
Item Number:0768-B-40  (online)
System  Number: 000870928
2007
2008
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July 6, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29685]



[[Page 60701]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-312-007]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff and of Compliance Filing

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing to its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become effective on 
November 1, 1997:

Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 30

    Tennessee states that the above tariff sheet is being filed for the 
dual-purpose of (1) implementing negotiated rate contracts pursuant to 
the Commission's Statement of Policy on Alternatives to Traditional 
Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines and Regulation of 
Negotiated Transportation Services of Natural Gas Pipelines issued 
January 31, 1996, at Docket Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-000 and (2) 
complying with the Commission's October 29, 1997 letter Order issued in 
the above-referenced docket. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, 81 FERC 
para. 61,114 (1997).
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29685 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 60161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29644]



[[Page 60161]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Parts 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, and 130

[Docket No. 94-106-10]
RIN O579-AA71


Importation of Animals and Animal Products; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service will host a public meeting to discuss the agency's 
plans for implementing a final rule and policy statement on the 
importation of animals and animal products that were published in the 
Federal Register on October 28, 1997.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on November 21, 1997, from 9:00 
a.m. to noon.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the USDA Center at 
Riverside, Conference Room D, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD. Parking 
is available next to the building for a $2.00 fee (have quarters or 
$1.00 bills). The nearest Metro station is the College Park station on 
the Green Line, and it is within walking distance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Gary Colgrove, Chief Staff 
Veterinarian, National Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 
River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231, (301) 734-8590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 28, 1997, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 
(APHIS) published a final rule in the Federal Register (62 FR 56000-
56026, Docket No. 94-106-9) that establishes procedures and a 
regulatory framework for recognizing regions, rather than only 
countries, for the purpose of importing animals and animal products 
into the United States. The final rule also establishes procedures by 
which regions may request permission to export animals and animal 
products to the United States under specified conditions, based on the 
regions' disease status. The final rule is scheduled to become 
effective on November 28, 1997. A notice published in the same issue of 
the Federal Register (62 FR 56027-56033, Docket No. 94-106-8) sets 
forth our policy on regionalization. The policy statement and 
regulations are in accordance with international trade agreements 
entered into by the United States.
    The public meeting on November 21, 1997, in Riverdale, MD, will 
provide an opportunity for APHIS to discuss its plans for implementing 
the final rule and policy on regionalization. All interested persons 
are invited to attend.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 5th day of November 1997.
Terry L. Medley,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 97-29644 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 167 (Friday, August 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 52274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21483]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0422; FRL-9933-23]

Pesticide Cumulative Risk Assessment; Framework for Screening 
Analysis; Notice of Availability and Request for Comment; Extension of 
Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of July 29, 2015, 
announcing the availability of draft guidance for public comment 
entitled: ``Pesticide Cumulative Risk Assessment: Framework for 
Screening Analysis.'' This document extends the comment period for an 
additional 30 days, from August 28, 2015 to September 28, 2015. EPA is 
extending the comment period in response to requests for an extended 
comment period to allow for full participation.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0422, must be received on or before September 
28, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in 
the Federal Register document of July 29, 2015 (80 FR 45218) (FRL-9930-
32).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Registration Division 
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone 
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register document of July 29, 2015 
(80 FR 45218) (FRL-9930-32), in which EPA announced the availability of 
the following draft guidance for public comment: ``Pesticide Cumulative 
Risk Assessment: Framework for Screening Analysis,'' and solicited 
comments on a draft copy of the human health risk assessment where the 
cumulative assessment was conducted in conjunction with pending actions 
for abamectin. EPA is hereby extending the end of the comment period 
from August 28, 2015 to September 28, 2015.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register 
document of July 29, 2015. If you have questions, consult the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority:  FFDCA section 408(b) [21 U.S.C. 346a(b)].

    Dated: August 25, 2015.
Jack Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-21483 Filed 8-26-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### Dale W. JOHNSON and Robert V. Clark, Petitioners, v. The FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION and Casimir M. Szpak, Respondents.

Nos. 77-740, 77-742.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

Stephen C. Frasier of Sommer, Frasier & Fenniman, Stuart, for petitioner-Johnson.

W. Dave Womack, Tequesta, for petitioner-CIark.

Howard Hadley and Frederick H. Wilsen, Jr., Winter Park, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
#### David Bowles, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Enos Lewis, Plaintiff in Error.

1. Writ dismissed for want of assignment of error..

*Error to the St. Charles Cirmit Court.*

*A. H.*Buchner, for Respondent.

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case there has been filed neither assignment of errors, statement nor brief, by the party who seeks a reversal of the judgment of the court below.

Let the writ of error be dismissed.

The other Judges concur.
# L_2005342EN.01010401.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/104 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/104

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2134/2005 of 22 December 2005 fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 340 of 23 December 2005
  )

On page 53, in the Annex, in the table, second part, last line, second column ‘Destination’, concerning product code ‘2106 90 55 9000’:

for:

‘
  C10
  ’,

read:

‘
  C14
  ’.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-10445

Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE PAUL SALEMO,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(USDC No. 3:96-CR-393-1-H)

_________________________________________________________________

March 6, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George Paul Salemo appeals his conviction for aiding and

abetting and escape from custody. He contends that his guilty plea

is invalid because the district court violated several provisions

of FED. R. CRIM. P. 11 during the colloquy.
2

The district court failed to inform Salemo during the plea

colloquy that his maximum sentence includes three years of

supervised release. This omission, however, when added to Salemo’s

sentence of imprisonment of 27 months, resulted in a total sentence

of only three months more than the maximum 60 months stated by the

district court during the colloquy. Moreover, this period of

supervised release is to run concurrently with the period of

supervised release imposed on Salemo for his prior offenses.

Accordingly, the error was harmless. See United States v. Johnson,

1 F.3d 296, 302 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc) (substantial rights are

affected when “the district court’s flawed compliance with ... Rule

11 ... may reasonably be viewed as having been a material factor

affecting [defendant]’s decision to plead guilty”).

Salemo contends also that his substantial rights were affected

when the district court failed to address individually the rights

enumerated in Rule 11(c)(3). Instead, the court asked Salemo and

his counsel whether they had discussed the rights Salemo would give

up in pleading guilty. Salemo fails to explain how this omission

affected his substantial rights; therefore, it is unnecessary to

address this contention. Id. at 298.

AFFIRMED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1668 

To extend the authority for agencies to reimburse paid leave provided by 

Federal contractors to certain employees or subcontractors unable to 

perform work due to the COVID–19 pandemic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2021 

Mr. WITTMAN (for himself and Mr. RUPPERSBERGER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To extend the authority for agencies to reimburse paid leave 

provided by Federal contractors to certain employees or 

subcontractors unable to perform work due to the 

COVID–19 pandemic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORITY 

4 FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS. 

5 Section 3610 of the CARES Act (Public Law 116– 

6 136; 134 Stat. 414) is amended by striking ‘‘September 

7 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS