alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1827 

To prohibit Federal funding of State firearm ownership databases, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. BUDD, Mr. GUEST, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. PERRY, 

Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. BROOKS, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. WEBER of 

Texas, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. 

STEUBE, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. PALMER, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. 

GIBBS, Mr. BUCK, Mr. CAWTHORN, Mr. KELLER, Mr. HAGEDORN, Mr. 

REED, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. JACKSON, 

Mr. MANN, Mr. NORMAN, Ms. HERRELL, Mr. JORDAN, Mrs. GREENE of 

Georgia, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 

MCCLINTOCK, Mr. BABIN, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mrs. WAGNER, Mrs. 

FISCHBACH, Mr. CARL, and Mr. STEWART) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding of State firearm ownership 

databases, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Owner Registra5 tion Information Protection Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1827 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING OF STATE 

2 FIREARM OWNERSHIP DATABASES. 

3 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of 

5 the several States, the District of Columbia, the 

6 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth 

7 of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, 

8 Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, and any 

9 other territory or possession of the United States. 

10 (2) STATE FIREARM OWNERSHIP DATABASE.— 

11 The term ‘‘State firearm ownership database’’ 

12 means a comprehensive or partial database of a 

13 State or political subdivision of a State that lists— 

14 (A) firearms lawfully owned or possessed 

15 by individuals; or 

16 (B) individuals who lawfully own or pos17 sess firearms. 

18 (b) PROHIBITION.—A Federal agency may not fund 

19 or otherwise support the establishment or maintenance of 

20 a State firearm ownership database. 

21 (c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (b) shall not apply to 

22 a database of a State or political subdivision of a State 

23 that lists— 

24 (1) firearms that have been reported as lost or 

25 stolen; or 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1827 IH

1 (2) individuals who have reported their firearms 

2 as lost or stolen. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-080-082-6230-00; GP8-0024]


Emergency Closure Restriction on Public Lands, Salem District, 
Oregon

ACTION: Emergency closure restriction on public lands notice, Salem 
District, Oregon.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that public lands in Clackamas County, 
Oregon, are temporarily closed to all public use, including vehicle 
operation, camping, and shooting, from October 16, 1997, until further 
notice. This order is issued under the authority of 43 CFR 8364.1 and 
closes additional roads and public lands to public access and use. 
Notice is hereby given that the following areas are closed to motor 
vehicle access and use:

1. Approximately 5 acres incorporating two open areas, one east and 
one west of the Pine Creek; Bridge on the Molalla River, near the 
intersection of Pine Creek Road and the Molalla Forest; Road in 
Section 30, T. 6 S., R. 3 E.,Will. Mer., Oreg.;

EXEMPTIONS: The following persons, operating within the scope of their 
official duties, are exempt from the provisions of this closure order: 
BLM employees; state, local, and federal law enforcement and fire 
protection personnel; holders of BLM road use permits or contracts that 
include areas within the closure including their employees and 
subcontractors. Access by additional parties may be allowed but must be 
approved in advance by the Authorized Officer.

PENALTIES: Any person who fails to comply with the provisions of this 
closure order may be subject to the penalties provided in 43 CFR 
8360.0-7, which include a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment 
not to exceed 12 months, as well as penalties provided under Oregon 
State Law.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This emergency closure shall remain in effect until 
revised, revoked, or amended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Prather, Area Manager, 
Cascades Resource Area, 1717 Fabry Road SE, Salem, OR 97306, (503) 375-
5646.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of these closures is to protect 
water quality, soil, vegetation, and sensitive cultural, 
paleontological, and riparian resources from excessive damage and 
provide for visitor safety.
Scott S. Abdon,
Acting Area Manager, Cascades Resource Area.
[FR Doc. 97-29941 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,229-01

EX PARTE BRANDON DARNELL ROBINSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1275371-A IN THE 177 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment. The First Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Robinson v. State, 01-12-00593-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st

Dist.] Nov. 14, 2013)(not designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notifyApplicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to inform Applicant
2

of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. 

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. The trial court has entered findings

of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his

conviction had been affirmed and failed to provide Applicant notice of his right to file a pro se

petition for discretionary review, along with the applicable deadlines. The trial court recommends

that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionaryreview of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-12-00593-CR

that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 1275371 from the 177 Judicial District Court of Harris th

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of

the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: May 20, 2015

Do not publish
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12

- 422 V

Filed: April 3, 2014

Not for P ublication

*************************************

LILLIAN RANDALL

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Ronald C. Homer , Boston, MA , for petitioner.

Melonie J. McCall , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On April 3 , 2014 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts t h at she incu rred

no out

- of

- pocket expenses in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner f iled an application for attorneys’

fees and costs o n March 25 , 2014

. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o

certain items in petitioner’ s application

. Based on these objections, petitioner amend s her request

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special master s will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of priva cy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

for reimbursement for attor neys’ fees and costs to $1 4

, 566

. 30

. Respondent does not object to this

amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards

$ 1 4

, 566.30

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the

form of a chec k made payable jointly to petitioner and C onway, Homer & Chin

- Caplan, P.C. in the

amount of $ 1 4

, 566.30

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1159-DR]


Washington; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Washington, (FEMA-1159-DR), dated January 17, 1997, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Washington, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of January 17, 1997:

    The counties of Clallam, Grays Harbor, Island, Kitsap, Kittitas, 
Mason, Pierce, Skagit, Skamania, Spokane, Thurston, and Yakima for 
Individual Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-2968 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0356n.06 Filed: May 5, 2005 03-1338 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. JUSTIN C. WILSON Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN O P I N I O N

BEFORE: MARTIN, COLE, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Justin C. Wilson appeals his se ntence imposed following his convictions via guilty plea for conspiracy to distribute more th an 50 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846 and conspiracy to launder m oney in violation of 18.U.S.C. § 1956(h). This Court has previously held that the district court properly applied a leadership sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). United States v. Wilson , 112 Fed.Appx. 497, 2004 WL 2367972 (6th Cir. Oct. 20, 2004). On certiorari, that judgment was vacated and remanded to this Court for proceedings consistent with United States v. Booker , 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). Wilson v. United States , 125 S.Ct. 1392 (2005). Upon consideration, the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for resentencing pursuant to the decisions in United States v. Oliver , 397 F.3d 369 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. Barnett , 398 F.3d 516 (6th Cir. 2005). On remand, “we encourage the sentencingjudge to explicitly state his reas ons for applying particular Guidelines, and sentencing within the recommended Guidelines range, or in the alternative, for choosing to sentence outside that range. Such a statement will f acilitate appellate review as to whether the sentence was ‘reasonable.’” United States v. Jones , 399 F.3d 640, 650 (6th Cir. 2005); see also Booker , 125 S.Ct. at 765 (noting that appellate review of a district court sentence is for reasonableness); United States v. Webb , — F.3d —, 2005 WL 763367 (6th Cir. 2005) (engaging in reasonableness review, but refusing to “define rigidly at this time either the meaning of reasonableness or the procedures that a district judge must employ in sentencing post- Booker”). Accordingly, we VACATEthe sentence and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund II, Inc., on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| August 29, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark                 |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------|
|            | Michael G. Clark                    |
|            | President                           |
|            | DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund II, Inc. |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund II, Inc., on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| August 29, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------|
|            | Paul Schubert                         |
|            | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|            | DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund II, Inc.   |
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03728**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  03728\03728_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 03728\03728_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03728\03728_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03728\03728_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03728\03728_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03728\03728_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03728\03728_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03728\03728_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03728\03728_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL C3-29.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL D2-3 Ash Pond Retention Time Study.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL D2-3 Whole Effluent Toxicity Management Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03728\Supporting Documents\03728_COL D3-1 D-1 and D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03728\Supporting Documents\03728_WPL's Response to EPA ICR_WPL_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.37 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Protocol to the Treaty of 

June 13, 1997 Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and LATVIA 

Signed at Riga December 7, 2005 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 LATVIA 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Protocol to the treaty of June 13, 1997. 

Signed at Riga December 7, 2005; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at Riga 

 June 29, 2006 and April 15, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 






NOTE: Agreement signed December 7, 2005 - original received from post without date on Agreement.








NOTE: Agreement signed December 7, 2005 - original received from post without date on Agreement.
#### State of Missouri, Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*John G. Foss, *Defendant*in Error.

I. State vs. Foss, ante, p.416 Affirmed.

*Error to Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.*

*O.*Oarstarjphen, *Wrn. P.*Harrison, *and M. L.*Hollister, for Plaintiff in Error.

*W. H. 8,- G. F.*Hatch, for Defendant in Error.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is similar in all respects to the one decided at the present term between the same parties, and for the reasons given in that case the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. The other Judges concurring.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-915 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Security of Information 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MEXICO 

Signed September 15, 2008 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MEXICO 

Defense: Security of Information 

 Agreement signed September 15, 2008; 

 Entered into force September 15, 2008.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 21, 2021

p0414

Order 

Clerk

April 21, 2021

162063

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 162063

COA: 347918

Wayne CC: 17-015647-CK

OMAR HYDER KHAN, MINARA BEGUM

CHOWDHURY, RAFNA BEGUM 

CHOWDHURY, MOHAMMED SALEH AHMED,

RED AHMED, TAZIN ULLAH, and DAVID

EDWARD MOLITOR,

Defendants,

and

LOVELY HORE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 20, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.