alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION

I, Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Commercial Corp., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial
Corp. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures, to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;
                                      -21-
and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2003
                                           /S/ BERNARD KORN
                                           ----------------
                                           Bernard Korn
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Chairman of the Board and President
Positioning Challenges and 

Vision for Transportation

ION GNSS+

September 17, 2015
Enabling Research

• Communications, Cloud Data

• Local Sensors

• Data Fusion

September 17, 2015 ION GNSS+ 2

• Control 

Systems

• Human-inthe-Loop
Connected Vehicles

September 17, 2015 ION GNSS+ 3

• Benefits: Safety, 

Mobility, Energy

• Applications

– Platooning

– Intersections

• What’s Next

– Scaling benefits, 

interoperability

– Verification
Truck Platooning

• Benefits: Energy, Mobility, Safety

• Research Issues 

– HMI, vehicle dynamics, scenarios

September 17, 2015 ION GNSS+ 4
Pedestrian Navigation

• Benefits: Mobility, Safety

• Research Issues

– Signal access

– Power

– Indoor to outdoor 

transitions

• What’s Next

– HMI

– Initial network

September 17, 2015 ION GNSS+ 5
Government Vision

• Public Benefit Promoting

– Health and safety, economics

– Access to open, heterogeneous 

network

David Kuehn

Program Manager

202-493-3414

david.kuehn@dot.gov

September 17, 2015 ION GNSS+ 6
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-07507 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS Investments VIT Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

Two International Place

Boston, MA  02110

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 12/31/07 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

****

December 31, 2007

ANNUAL REPORT

**DWS INVESTMENTS VIT FUNDS**

**DWS Small Cap Index VIP**

**Contents**

**17**    Performance Summary

**18**     Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses

**19**       Management Summary

**20**    Portfolio Summary

**22**  Investment Portfolio

**41**       Financial Statements

**44**       Financial Highlights

**45**      Notes to Financial Statements

**49**        Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

**50**        Tax Information

**51**       Proxy Voting

**52**        Investment Management Agreement Approval

**55**        Summary of Management Fee Evaluation byIndependent Fee Consultant

**58** Trustees and Officers

**This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. To obtain an additional prospectus, call (800) 778-1482 oryour financial representative. We advise you to consider the Portfolio's objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefullybefore investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the Portfolio. Please read theprospectus carefully before you invest.**

The Portfolio is subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal amount invested. There is no guarantee that thePortfolio will be able to mirror the Russell 2000® Index closely enough to track its performance for several reasons, including thePortfolio's cost to buy and sell securities, the flow of money into and out of the Portfolio, and the potential underperformance of stocksselected. Stocks of small companies involve greater risk than securities of larger, more-established companies, as they often havelimited product lines, markets or financial resources and may be subject to more erratic and abrupt market movements. All of thesefactors may result in greater share price volatility. Please read the prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and riskprofile.

*Russell 2000 is a trademark of the Frank Russell Company and has been licensed for use by the Portfolio's investment advisor.*

*DWS Scudder is part of Deutsche Asset Management, which is the marketing name in the US for the asset management activities ofDeutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. and DWS Trust Company.*

*NOT FDIC/NCUA INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE NOT A DEPOSIT*
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable Betty Binns Fletcher, Senior Circuit Judge for the Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeals, fully participated in the case and concurred in the

judgment prior to her death.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

THOMAS M. KLASSY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10372

D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00503-MCE-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 16, 2012

San Francisco, California

Before: B. FLETCHER,** D.W. NELSON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Thomas Klassy devised a criminal scheme to bilk his creditors by declaring

bankruptcy while simultaneously hiding assets that could be used to satisfy his

FILED

NOV 05 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

debts. His scheme discovered, Klassy was tried and convicted of money

laundering and various types of fraud. Klassy appeals his sentence, but not his

conviction, for the second time. A panel of this Court previously vacated Klassy’s

sentence and remanded for resentencing after concluding that the district court

calculated Klassy’s total offense level, 33, starting with a base offense level one

too high (seven, rather than six). See United States v. Klassy (“Klassy I”), 409 F.

App’x 169, 171 (9th Cir. 2011). This time, we do not find the district court clearly

erred in making the factual findings supporting its Guideline calculation—a total

offense level of 32—nor do we find that the district court abused its discretion in

applying the Guidelines to the facts that it found when sentencing Klassy to 121

months’ imprisonment. United States v. Dann, 652 F.3d 1160, 1175 (9th Cir.

2011). 

The question underlying this appeal is whether the district court concluded

properly that Klassy intended to cause more than $400,000 in losses to his

creditors, thereby justifying its application of a 14-level enhancement to Klassy’s

offense level. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B1.1(b)(1) (prescribing

offense level enhancements keyed to the amount of loss a defendant caused, or

sought to cause, by his fraudulent conduct). The district court was entitled to

calculate the losses Klassy intended to cause his creditors in either of two ways: as
3

the value of the assets Klassy attempted to conceal from them, or as the total

amount of unsecured debt Klassy sought to discharge in bankruptcy. Klassy I, 409

F. App’x at 171–72 (citing United States v. Bussell, 504 F.3d 956, 962–63 (9th Cir.

2007)). Consequently, even if Klassy could, as he argues, prove at resentencing

that he concealed under $400,000 in assets, he nevertheless sought to discharge

more than $400,000 in unsecured debt, see In re Klassy, No. 03-26999 (Bankr.

E.D. Cal. July 16, 2003) (Doc. No. 10), and—as the district court noted—could

therefore be subject to the same 14-level enhancement. The district court did not

err in applying it.

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50200

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AGUSTIN MARTINEZ-GARZA, also known

as Tino Garza, also known as Augustin

Martinez, also known as Augstin Martinez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-467-ALL

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Agustin MartinezGarza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[FE Docket No. 97-87-NG]


Office of Fossil Energy; PROGAS U.S.A., Inc.; Order Granting 
Long-Term Authorization To Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting ProGas U.S.A., Inc. 
authority to import from Canada up to 26,500 Mcf per day of natural gas 
for the period of November 1, 1998, through October 31, 2008. This 
natural gas will be purchased from ProGas Limited and imported near 
Noyes, Minnesota.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Natural Gas & Petroleum Import and Export Activities Docket Room, 3F-
056, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20585-0350, (202) 586-9478. The docket room is open between the hours 
of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. November 6, 1997.
Wayne E. Peters,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulation, Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum 
Import and Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 97-30346 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### GULFSTAR YACHT COMPANY and Westchester Fire Insurance Group, Petitioners, v. Blackie L. STRICKLAND and Industrial Relations Commission, Florida Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. 43854.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 27, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-38-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Statements of 
Refunds Due and Request for Waiver

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 10, 1997, Natural Gas Pipeline Company 
of America (Natural) tendered for filing its Statements of Refunds Due 
(Statements) with respect to the Kansas ad valorem tax relating to 
Natural's gas purchases for the period of October 3, 1983, through June 
28, 1988. Natural states that each statement was served upon the 
affected First Seller. Filing of such Statements is required by 
Ordering Paragraph (B) of the Commission's Order issued in the 
referenced docket on September 10, 1997.
    Natural states that in addition to submitting the Statements, 
Natural is requesting that the Commission grant to Natural a waiver of 
Ordering Paragraphs (D), (E) and (F) of the September 10 Order. Those 
provisions of the September 10 Order require that pipelines refund any 
amounts collected pursuant to such Statements.
    Natural states that copies of this filing have been served on 
Natural's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211). All such 
petitions or protests should be filed on or before November 21, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30439 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0226 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRADLEY JAY HILLIOUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 2 9, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 21 2023

02/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0226
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1882 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1882

 To amend the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 to include the rural 
development voucher program as a covered housing program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2021

Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 to include the rural 
development voucher program as a covered housing program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VAWA Protections for Rural Women Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. COVERED HOUSING PROGRAMS.

    Paragraph (3) of section 41411(a) of the Violence Against Women Act 
of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12491(a)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (I), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (J) as subparagraph (K); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (I) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(J) rural development housing voucher assistance 
                provided by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to 
                section 542 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 
                1490r), without regard to subsection (b) of such 
                section, and applicable appropriation Acts; and''.
                                 <all>
```
Hogan 

Lovells 

January 24, 2014 

Susan Kurland 

[)oT-osT-:J.ooo-7 18 ~ 

Hogan Lovells US LLP 

Columbia Square 

555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20004 

+1.202.637.5600 Tel 

+1.202.637.5910 Fax 

Robert E. Cohn, Partner 

202.637.4999 

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Republic Airline's Air-21 "Within-Perimeter" DCA Slot Exemptions 

Docket DOT -OST -2000-7182 

Dear Assistant Secretary Kurland: 

Republic Airline Inc. hereby notifies the Department that effective February 1, 2014, it is 

turning back to the Department two Air-21 slot exemptions issued to Republic by DOT Order 

2012-3-8. Republic currently uses these two slot exemptions for nonstop service to/from 

Kansas City on behalf of Frontier Airlines. Frontier has been sold, and it has advised Republic 

that it will not continue Frontier-branded service between DCA and Kansas City after February 

1, 2014. In these circumstances, and without prejudice to the long-term disposition of the slots 

by the Department, Republic would not object to the grant of pendente lite authority to another 

carrier to continue service. 

cc: Bryan Bedford 

Ethan Blank 

\\DC- 040601/000001 -5328421 v2 

Respectfully submitted, 

{ldf~u___. 

Robert E. Cohn 

Patrick R. Rizzi 

Counsel for Republic Airline Inc.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 27 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1765 

[Report No. 117–44] 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing a proposed rule 

relating to restricted access to the Washington Channel in Washington, 

D.C., and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2021 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

MAY 28, 2021 

Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1765 RH

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing 

a proposed rule relating to restricted access to the Washington Channel in Washington, D.C., and for other purposes. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1765 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington Channel 

5 Public Access Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF RULE. 

7 The Secretary of the Army may not finalize, imple8 ment, or enforce the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Washington 

9 Channel, Fort McNair, Washington, DC; Restricted 

10 Area’’, published by the Department of the Army on De11 cember 29, 2020 (Docket No. COE–2019–0010; 85 Fed. 

12 Reg. 85570), or any other rule that restricts public access 

13 to the Washington Channel in Washington, DC. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 27 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1765 

[Report No. 117–44] 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from impleD.C., and for other purposes. cess to the Washington Channel in Washington, menting a proposed rule relating to restricted acMAY 28, 2021 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS