alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| May 30, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark                     |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|         | Michael G. Clark                        |
|         | President                               |
|         | Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund, on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| May 30, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                        |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|         | Paul Schubert                           |
|         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   |
|         | Tax-Exempt California Money Market Fund |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-11422

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARK WOOLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:94-CR-29-2

- - - - - - - - - -

April 28, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Wooley, federal prisoner # 25952-077, appeals from the

district court’s denial of his motion to correct his sentence

following the revocation of his supervised release. He has filed

motions with this court to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal

and for the preparation of a transcript of the revocation hearing

at government expense. Wooley’s motion for reduction of sentence

was unauthorized and without a jurisdictional basis in the

district court. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 
No. 98-11422

-2-

(5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, his motions are DENIED and the

appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

This Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the “Assignment _and Assumption Agreement”) is entered into as of
08-01-2013 by and between Bank of America, National Association
(“Assignor”) and Urban Trust Bank (“Assignee”).

All terms used, but not defined, herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Underlying Agreement (defined
below).

WHEREAS, Assignor and Federal National Mortgage Association, a federally chartered corporation, as financial agent of
the United States (“Fannie Mae”), are parties to a Commitment to Purchase Financial Instrument and Servicer
Participation Agreement, a complete copy of which (including all exhibits, amendments and modifications thereto) is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Underlying Agreement”);

WHEREAS, Assignor has agreed to assign to Assignee all of its rights and obligations under the Underlying Agreement
with respect to the Eligible Loans that are identified on the schedule attached hereto as Schedule | (collectively, the
“Assigned Rights and Obligations”); and

WHEREAS, Assignee has agreed to assume the Assigned Rights and Obligations.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s rights and obligations under the Underlying
Agreement with respect to the Assigned Rights and Obligations.

2. Assumption. Assignee hereby accepts the foregoing assignment and assumes all of the rights and obligations of
Assignor under the Underlying Agreement with respect to the Assigned Rights and Obligations.

3. Effective Date. The date on which the assignment, and assumption of rights and obligations under the Underlying
Agreement is effective is 08-01-2013

4, Successors. All future transfers and assignments of the Assigned Rights and Obligations transferred and assigned
hereby are subject to the transfer and assignment provisions of the Underlying Agreement. This Assignment and
Assumption Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the permitted successors and assigns of the
parties hereto.

5. Counterparts. This Assignment and Assumption Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
an original, but all of which together constitute one and the same instrument.

E-1


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee, by their duly authorized officials, hereby execute and deliver this
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, together with Schedule |, effective as of the date set forth in Section 3 above.

ASSIGNOR; Bank of America, National Association

ASSIGNEE: Urban Trust Bank

By; By:
Name: Craig Bango eC SSPE ing GZ. LilViam s
Title: SVP TitleChyiet “Wrsk Ofer

Date:_7/11/2013

Date: 771 2013
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.39 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Instrument Amending the Treaty of 

March 13, 1997 

Between the UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA and LUXEMBOURG 

Signed at Washington February 1, 2005 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 LUXEMBOURG 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Instrument amending the treaty of March 13, 1997. 

Signed at Washington February 1, 2005; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at Washington 

 April 24, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 








NOTE: Instrument signed February 1, 2005.
Exhibit 10.1


 





THIRD AMENDMENT TO ARCONIC


EMPLOYEES’ EXCESS BENEFITS PLAN
C


(as amended and restated effective August
1, 2016)


 


Pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Arconic Employees’
Excess Benefits Plan C (“Plan”), the Plan is amended effective March 31, 2018, as follows:


 


		1.	The Plan shall be amended by adding the following sentence
to the end of the second paragraph of the introductory section of the Plan:



 


“Effective after March 31, 2018, this Excess
Plan shall be frozen, no additional Participants shall become eligible to participate in this Excess Plan, and no additional benefit
shall be accrued except in the limited circumstances described in Section 2.10 hereof.”


 


		2.	Article I (“Definitions”) of the Plan shall
be amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the definition of “Average Final Compensation”:



 


Average Final Compensation is frozen effective as
of March 31, 2018, and shall not be increased to reflect any additional earnings after March 31, 2018, under any circumstances.


 


		3.	Article I (“Definitions”) of the Plan shall
be amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the definition of “Pension Service”:



 


No Pension Service shall be earned or accrued after
March 31, 2018 except as provided in the limited circumstances described under Section 2.10 hereof.


 


		4.	Article I (“Definitions”) of the Plan shall
be amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the definition of “Participant”:



 


Effective April 1, 2018, no new Participants shall
become eligible to begin participation in this Excess Plan.


 


		5.	A new Section 2.10 shall be added to the Plan as follows:



 


Effective after March 31, 2018, this Excess Plan shall
be frozen, and no additional benefits shall be earned hereunder, except to the extent that a Participant was on layoff prior to
March 31, 2018 that continued after March 31, 2018, and the Participant continued to earn Pension Service under Plan I. Under no
circumstance will any Pension Service be earned after March 31, 2019 for participants who were on layoff under any circumstances.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, service with the Company after March 31, 2018 shall be used solely for purposes of determining vesting
and eligibility for Early Retirement benefits.


 


		6.	In all other respects, the Plan is ratified and confirmed.
#### Arline M. VADALA and Anthony Vadala, Appellants, v. Brian Jay ADAMS et al., Appellees.

No. 73-236.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1973.

E. Hugh Chappell, Jr., Walsh, Dolan & Krupnick, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Fred C. Davant, Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an order granting a new trial is dismissed upon authority of this Court’s Opinion in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., 283 So.2d 68, opinion filed June 6, 1973; Opinion on Petition for Rehearing filed July 31, 1973.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and DOWN-EY, JJ., concur.
256 La. 1155

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Burnis McINNIS.

No. 51005.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 25, 1970.

In re: Burnis Mclnnis aplying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

The application is denied. Applicant has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction.
```

[House Document 110-74]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

110th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 110-74

 
    CONTINUATION OF EMERGENCY REGARDING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                     THEPRESIDENTOFTHEUNITEDSTATES

                              transmitting

 NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED WITH RESPECT TO THE 
PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND THEIR DELIVERY SYSTEMS 
DECLARED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER 12938 ON NOVEMBER 14, 1994, AS AMENDED, IS 
 TO CONTINUE IN EFFECT BEYOND NOVEMBER 14, 2007, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 
                                1622(d)

  November 9, 2007.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed

    To the Congress of the United States:
    In accordance with section 202(d) of the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I transmit herewith notice 
of a 1-year continuation of the national emergency with respect 
to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction that was 
declared in Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, as 
amended.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, November 8, 2007.
                                 Notice

                              ----------                              

    Continuation of Emergency Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction

    On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the 
President declared a national emergency with respect to the 
unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 
foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by the 
proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons 
``weapons of mass destruction'' and the means of delivering 
such weapons. On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive 
Order 13094 amending Executive Order 12938 to respond more 
effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons of mass 
destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, I 
issued Executive Order 13382 which, inter alia, further amended 
Executive Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat 
proliferation. The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction 
and the means of delivering them continues to pose an unusual 
and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 
policy, and economy of the United States; therefore, the 
national emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, and 
extended in each subsequent year, must continue. In accordance 
with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 
1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 
declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and 
transmitted to the Congress.
                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, November 8, 2007.

                                  

```
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of The New Germany Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSRS; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| August 25, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark        |
|-----------------|----------------------------|
|            | Michael G. Clark           |
|            | President                  |
|            | The New Germany Fund, Inc. |

 

 

----
258 La. 908

#### CHOCTAW HOME BUILDERS, INC., et al. v. LENA, INC., et al.

No. 51425.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1971.

In re: Lena, Inc., John R. Grand, Jr., and T. Lacy Grand applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 246 So.2d 212.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric E. Parsons, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 8, 2007



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    ERIC E. PARSONS                         
|Eric E. Parsons                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Clarke E. THOMAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44672.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 22, 1974.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D

.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES, AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

Andrew S. Hartten Project Director DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Barley Mill Plaza - Bldg. 19 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington, DE 19805 

### SEP 24 2009

cr+

Attn: Memorandumof Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and E. L DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) for a Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program(November 3, 2005) Re: EPA Reviewof Final Report fromthe Peer Consultation Panel Dear Mr. Hartten: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing its input on the Final Peer Consultation Report dated July 15, 2009. EPA has carefully reviewed the Peer Consultation Report submitted by Dr. Mitchell Small of Carnegie Mellon and commends the panel members for providing an in-depth, well informed review of the Phase I and II monitoring and the proposed Phase III efforts. EPA also commends Dr. Small and colleagues for facilitating a thorough, high quality, independent peer consultation process . EPA agrees with the Peer Consultation panel's assessment of the quality and quantity of the data collected and the ability of the existing data to meet the Charge as defined in the MOU. We look forward to DuPont's response to the Final Report of the Peer Consultation Panel and the input fromEPA, as well as the revised version of the outline for the Final Work Plan. 

## CONTAINS NOCBI . illis, Director mical Control Division (7405M) 

### 3~~3~ ~cc: EPA Docket ID No. : OPPT-2004-0113

Cathy Fehrenbacher - Mail Code 7406M Lawrence Libelo - Mail Code 7406M David W . Boothe E. I . du Pont de Nemours and Company 4417 Lancaster Pike, CRP 708/110 Wilmington, DE 19805
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MG98-3-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Filing

November 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 6, 1997, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee) filed updated standards of conduct under 
Standard I, 18 CFR 161.3(i), and to reflect changes resulting from the 
corporate merger with El Paso Natural Gas Company and sale of Kern 
River Gas Transmission Company.
    East Tennessee states that it served a copy of the filing on all of 
its customers and affected state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214. All such motions to 
intervene or protest should be filed on or before November 25, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30071 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 10.25**

**CHESAPEAKE LODGING TRUST**

**Trustee Compensation Policy**

Commencing with the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, the non-officer trustees of Chesapeake Lodging Trust (the“Trust”) shall be paid an annual retainer fee of $60,000, payable quarterly. In addition, the audit committee chairman will be paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000, the compensation committee chairman will be paid anadditional annual retainer of $10,000 and the nominating and corporate governance committee chairman will be paid an additional annual retainer of $7,500, in each case payable quarterly. The non-executive Chairman of the Board of Trustees of theTrust will be paid an additional annual retainer of $20,000. Although the Trust will reimburse the trustees for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with performance of their duties as trustees, including, without limitation,travel expenses in connection with their attendance at board and committee meetings, the Trust will not pay any trustee a separate fee for meetings attended. Furthermore, trustees will not receive any perquisites. 

The non-officer trustees may elect to receive their annual retainers and chair committee fees in whole or in part in the form of cash or immediatelyvested common shares of beneficial interest of the Trust (“Common Shares”) based on the closing market price of the Common Shares on the grant date. 

In connection with each annual meeting of shareholders, each of the Trust’s non-officer trustees will receive a grant of 1,000 restricted Common Shares, except that the non-executive Chairman of theBoard of Trustees will receive a grant of 1,500 Common Shares in recognition of his or her expanded responsibilities in such capacity. A similar grant of 1,000 restricted Common Shares will be made to each new member of the Board of Trustees uponhis or her appointment or election to serve in such capacity. Vesting for all grants will occur on the date of the next annual meeting, with acceleration upon termination due to death, disability or involuntary termination of service as a result ofa change in control. Dividends will be paid on the unvested restricted shares when declared and paid on the Trust’s Common Shares generally.