alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Yisrael Gottlieb  the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer, Secretary  and Director of Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp , certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A #2 of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K/A #2 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: June 13, 2011
Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp .By:
/s/ Yisrael GottliebName:  Yisrael Gottlieb

Title:    Principal Accounting and Financial Officer, Secretary and

Director





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 10, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred     |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Charles                N. Eldred         |
|                              |   | Senior                Vice President and |
|                              |   | Chief                Financial Officer   |
|                              |   | PNM                Resources, Inc.       |
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50555

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee

v.

JOHN PHILLIP MARTIN,

Defendant – Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CR-71-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Phillip Martin pled guilty to three counts of mail fraud, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The district court sentenced him to 40 months of

imprisonment, which was within the Guidelines range of 33 to 41 months. On

appeal, Martin argues the sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is

greater than necessary to satisfy the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He contends

that the district court inordinately punished him for the seriousness of his crime,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 22, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-50555 Document: 00511032190 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/22/2010
No. 09-50555

2

and did not account for either his personal history and characteristics or the

circumstances surrounding the offense. 

The district court made an individualized sentencing decision based on the

facts of the case in light of the factors set out in Section 3553(a). See Gall v.

United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 596 (2007). The district court’s conclusion that a

sentence within the Guidelines is appropriate is entitled to deference, and we

presume that it is reasonable. See United States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531

F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir. 2008); Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 347 (2007).

The district court was in a superior position to find facts and assess their import

under Section 3553(a). We see no reason to disturb that court’s discretionary

decision to impose a sentence within the Guidelines range.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 09-50555 Document: 00511032190 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/22/2010
Size and Weight
Basic Parameters

Operating Temperature

-10°C ~ 50°C

Power Consumption

3.12W

Take-off Weight

<1200g

Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode)

Vertical: 0.8m

Horizontal: 2.5m

Max Yaw Angular Velocity

200°/s

Max Tilt Angle

45°

Max Ascent / Descent Speed

6m/s

Max Flight Velocity

10m/s
Diagonal distance (motor center to motor center)

350mm

Phantom Prop Guard

Weight(Single):18.7g

Size(Single): Angle(155.0°) Radius(112.32mm)

Whole Size with Four Prop Guards: 575.5mm

ESC Sound Introduction

Ready

♪1234567

Throttle stick is not at bottom

BBBBBB...

Input signal abnormal

B——–B——–B...

Input voltage abnormal

BB—BB—BB—BB...

Charger & Battery 

Parameters

Charger AC Input

100-240V

Charge Current

1A/2A/3A
Current Drain for Balancing

200mA

Power

20W

Battery Type

LiPo

TX Parameters

Working Frequency

2.4GHz ISM

Control Channels

7 Channels

Communication Distance

1000m

Receiver Sensitivity(1%PER)

>-100dBm

Power Consumption of TX

<20dBm

Working Current /Voltage
52 mA@6V

AA Battery

4 Required
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0054 Standard Review Draft 12/17/2008 Revision Date 05/26/2009

ENGINEER: Arnold \ CPW PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: safety glasses or goggles/ chemical resistant gloves and protective clothing/ adequate ventilation Respirator: follow OSHA respirator regulations Health Effects: Irritating to eyes and respiratory system/ slight skin irritation may occur/ may irritate gastrointestinal tract/ mucus membrane irritant TLV/PEL: none established

CRSS : Chemical Name: [5,6]Fullerene-C70-D5h(6) S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @
VP: 1.0E-6 torr @
MW: 721.00 %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form: End Use:Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns) (11/21/2008): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: U PBT rating: P3B1T1 LVE PBT Rating is P3 BU T1 Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claim:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: NoSTANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0054

Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Note: Water not required per SAT.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Inhalation:Dermal:STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0054

Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Note: Water not required per SAT.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:Inhalation:

Dermal:STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0054

Number of Sites/ Location: unknown site(s) Days/yr: Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Note: Water not required per SAT.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:Inhalation:

Dermal:
#### Jerry Lee ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-370.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 9, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1970.

*600James T. Norton, Green Cove Springs, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

The defendant in this case was represented by the Public Defender’s Office— properly advised as to all the possibilities and consequences of a plea of guilty, including the lesser included offenses. He entered his plea of guilty with this knowledge. This was on October 3, 1968. The particular Assistant Public Defender representing the defendant up to and including October 3, 1968, the date of entry of his guilty plea, and who requested a presen-tence investigation, left the Public Defender’s Office and became an Assistant State Attorney on January 1, 1969. Because of the time consumed in the presen-tence investigation, the defendant was not brought up for sentencing until January 1969, and another member of the Public Defender’s Office was present and accompanying the defendant when he appeared before the court for sentencing.

At this stage of the proceedings there was nothing further to be done by the defense attorney having a bearing upon the guilt of the defendant.

The trial court adjudged him guilty and improperly sentenced him to years in prison, which exceeded the maximum sentence allowed by statute. This error was called to the trial court’s attention by motion to vacate filed February 3, 1969, which motion also moved for a withdrawal of the defendant’s plea of guilty. Shortly thereafter, February 14, 1969, the trial court entered an order directing that the defendant be returned from Raiford for the purpose of sentencing, the first sentence having been vacated pursuant to the motion. The motion for withdrawal of the plea of guilty was denied.

The principal contention made by appellant is that he was not properly represented by counsel because his counsel did not spend enough time discussing his case. We find no merit to this contention. When a guilty party admits to his attorney in private that he is guilty, we fail to see where any great length of time is needed for further discussion. It should not be necessary for the defendant to prove he is guilty, and in the case sub judice, the attorney representing the defendant at the time he entered his plea of guilty was familiar with the facts and did not require any additional proof other than the defendant’s admission to him of his guilt. The fact that the member of the Public Defender’s Office standing with the defendant at sentencing on January 9, 1969, was not familiar with the facts of the case was immaterial. 'The attorney representing the defendant in October, when he entered his guilty plea was the really material point of representation.

For the reasons stated, we find no merit in this appeal and the judgment and sentence appealed from are affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Amendment Two to Employment Agreement - Murphy



EXHIBIT 10.11 (iii) 
 
AMENDMENT TWO 
TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 
Effective January 1, 2003, this AMENDMENT TWO TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT by and between Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., an Indiana insurance company (the “Company”) and John M. Murphy (the “Executive”) hereby amends the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) between the parties
dated as of the 6th day of September, 2000, as follows: 
 

	1.	 	Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the termination date and inserting in place thereof the 31st day of December, 2004. 

 

	2.	 	The first paragraph of Section 11 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the provision “one (1) year” and inserting in place thereof “eighteen
(18) months.” 

 

	3.	 	Section 16(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the provision “one (1) year” and inserting in place thereof “eighteen (18) months.”


 

	4.	 	All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed this AMENDMENT TWO TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT effective as of the day and year first above written. 
 
 

	 John M. Murphy
  
	 	 	 	 Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.
  

	
	 /s/ John M. Murphy
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Larry C. Glasscock

	
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	  
 Name: Larry C. Glasscock
  
 Title: President and CEO
#### Susan ZIERER v. STATE.

8 Div. 4.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 21, 1978.

*741Robert W. Walker, Florence, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Susan B. Bevill and Samuel J. Clenny, III, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State, appellee.

BOWEN W. SIMMONS, Retired Circuit Judge.

Appellant, an indigent, was indicted for possession of a Controlled Substance listed in Title 22, § 258(35)(b)(5), schedule IV, Recompiled Code, 1958. During the progress of the trial, and after some evidence was adduced, defendant entered a plea of guilty. Sentence: four years. Probation denied. This appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to the guilty plea.

We have examined the record and find that the Court, before accepting the plea of guilty, fully informed appellant of her rights under the law.

Attached to the written plea of guilty was a written statement, signed by defendant, in which she lists her rights and acknowledged that she had read the statement and understood it.

Defendant’s attorney signed a certificate thereto appended. He acknowledged that his client had read the statement or that he had read it to her. He further certified that he had explained to defendant her constitutional rights in detail and that she stated to him that she fully understood the same. Suffice it to say that appellant was fully informed of her rights.1

The plea of guilt, tendered by appellant and accepted by the Court, purged the record of error and cut off review of such assertions here tendered. *Knowles v. State,*280 Ala. 406, 194 So.2d 562(2)(3); *Hanes v. State,*56 Ala.App. 711, 325 So.2d 219(1); *Mack v. State,*51 Ala.App. 611, 288 So.2d 150(4); *Monroe v. State,*50 Ala.App. 302, 278 So.2d 751(6).

The judgment is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable Bowen W. Simmons, a retired Circuit Judge, serving as a Judge of this Court, under the provisions of § 6.10, of the new Judicial Article (Constitutional Amendment No. 328); his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

1

. *Ireland v. State,*47 Ala.App. 65, 250 So.2d 602.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            41,486
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,209
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  47,125
<CASH>                                          31,307
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,025
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             12,578
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              122
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  8,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,025
<PREMIUMS>                                      22,847
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,312
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  21
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  31,369
<BENEFITS>                                       8,716
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      9,370
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,267
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,357
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  15,227
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              8,260
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                1,820
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               5,013
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 1,168
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 19,126
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                           (267)



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection with this annual report of ML BlueTrend FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments, LLC the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: March 15, 2011

 
| By                                               | /s/   JUSTIN C. FERRI |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Justin   C. Ferri                                |                  |
| Chief   Executive Officer, President and Manager |                  |
| (Principal   Executive Officer)                  |                  |

 

----
#### Succession of Luke M. DANOS.

No. 62651.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Mrs. Enola Danos Autin applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 359 So.2d 679.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., would grant a writ.
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils &
Minerals, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Kenneth M. Cornell, Chief Accounting and Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with
  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and                              
| |     |                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | The information contained in
  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and result of operations of the Company.

|                    |  |                          
|------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Date: July 25, 2005 |  | By /s/ Kenneth M. Cornell
|                    |  |                          
|                    |  | Kenneth M. Cornell       
|                    |  | Chief Accounting and     
|                    |  | Financial Officer        

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and will be retained by Coastal
Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted


pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Accretive Health, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mary A. Tolan, Director, Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:








|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: February 29, 2012








/s/  Mary A. TolanMary A. TolanDirector, Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer