alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on form 10-KSB for the Year
Ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") by CaminoSoft Corp., the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

      1.    The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements
            of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
            amended, and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Registrant.

                                       /s/ MICHAEL SKELTON
                                       Michael Skelton
                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### Ex parte Donald A. FAWKES.

77-620.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 21, 1978.

ALMON, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
#### Lewis A. GIRAUD, Mrs. Elvira Louise Wiener Giraud, Mrs. Corinne Rotge Panquerne, Gerald L. Schroeder, Decatur Realty Corporation and Thomas L. Giraud v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS and the Hon. Henry Simmons, Director of the Department of Finance of the City of New Orleans as Tax Collector of the City of New Orleans. DECATUR REALTY CORPORATION v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 62670.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Lewis A. Giraud, Mrs. Elvira Louise Wiener Giraud, Mrs. Corinne Rotge Panquerne, Decatur Realty Corporation and Henry Bermingham, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 359 So.2d 294, 346 So.2d 1113.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 of OICco Acquisition I, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   By: /s/ Joshua SiskJoshua SiskChief Executive OfficerBy: /s/ Joshua SiskJoshua SiskChief Financial OfficerDated: June 29, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to OICco Acquisition I, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  1
3050

3050

3050

3000

3000

3000

3000

3050

3000

3000

3050

3000

3050

3050

3000

2950

3050

3000

3050

3050

3000

3000

3050

3000

3050

3000

3050

3050

3000

3000

3050

3050

3050

3000

3000

3000

STATE HWY 51

RD T

RD 25

RD K

RD M

RD R

RD 21

RD 24

RD 19

RD P

RD 18

RD 20

RD 23

RD L

ROAD S

K RD

RD 24

RD Q

STATE HWY 51

RD T

RD 25

RD K

RD M

RD R

RD 21

RD 24

RD 19

RD P

RD 18

RD 20

RD 23

RD L

ROAD S

K RD

RD 24

RD Q

OP51

41

13

41

14

41

15

41

16

41

17

41

18

41

19

41

20

41

21

41

22

41

23

41

12

41

24000mN

41

12

41

13

41

14

41

15

41

16

41

17

41

18

41

19

41

20

41

21

41

22

41

23

41

11000mN

41

24

3

02 3

03 3

04 305 306 307 308 3

09 310 301 3

11000m

E

3

02 3

03 304 305 306 307 308 3

09 3

10 3

01000mE 311

520 000FEET

540 000FEET

1 500000

1 530 000

FEET

FEET

10'

12'30"

10'

12'30"

12'30" 10'

101°15' 12'30" 10'

101°15'

37°15' 37°15'

101°07'30"

101°07'30"

37°07'30" 37°07'30"

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

WOODS NW, KS

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WOODS NW QUADRANGLE

KANSAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14S

Imagery.................................NAIP, July 2008 - August 2008

Roads.........................National Transportation Dataset, 2006

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Kansas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 19 ́

23 MILS

6° 49 ́

121 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14S

LG

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Moscow SE

Hugoton SE Woods SW

Hugoton

Woods SE

Moscow

Woods

Wagon Bed

Spring SE

Woods NW

KANSAS
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-919 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OMAN 

Signed at Muscat and Ft. Belvoir 

August 18 and September 19, 2008 

 with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
OMAN 

Defense 

 Agreement signed at Muscat and Ft. Belvoir 

 August 18 and September 19, 2008; 

 Entered into force September 19, 2008. 

 With annexes. 



NOTE: Subsection 2.1.2.1 on this page should be 2.1.4.1.





NOTE: It is noted that there are nine (9) annexes to this Agreement.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Hydrogen and fuel cell transitbus evaluations [electronic resource] : joint evaluation plan for the U.S.Department of Energy and the Federal Transit Administration**
 
SuDoc Number:E 9.16:NREL/TP-560-42781

Item Number:0430-P-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000624901
 
Report | Appendix A
 
April 1, 2020
In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_____________________ _____

09-16-00379-CR

09-16-00380-CR

09-16-00381-CR

__________________________

_________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the 410th District Court

of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 08-01-00886-CR and 08-01-00889-CR (Counts 1 and 2)

_________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief 

concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the 

motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine 

the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form 

motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 

313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Anna Mercedez Gutierrez, Appellant

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee
Appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We 

hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the 

reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification 

to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on 

or before February 23, 2017. See id., 436 S.W.3d at 321-22.

ORDER ENTERED January 24, 2017.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSE ANTHON Y HERNANDEZ and SAFEC O INSURANCE COMPANY

OF ILLINOIS a/k/a SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS,

INC.
, Appellant s ,

v.

REBECCA L. HEIKKA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 0905

[ April 4, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Carlos A. Rodriguez , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 09

- 039965

- 14

.

J. Pablo C á ceres and Hudson Jones of Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, Tampa, for appellant Safeco Insu rance Company of Illinois a/k/a Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, Inc

.

Kenneth D. Cooper, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

D AMOORGIAN
, J.

Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois appeals from a final judgment awarding Rebecca Heikka $361,775 in attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to section 627.428, Florida Statutes (2017) and as a sanction under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2017)

. Although we agree with Appellant that the trial court erred in awarding fees under section 627.428, the error was harmless because the trial court properly awarded fees under section

57.105 . We accordingly affirm without further comment.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., and M AY
, J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
S e e R h o d e s v . S ta te , 240 S. W . 3d 882, 891 ( T ex. C r i m . A pp. 2007) ( obs ervi ng 1 thates t oppel bycontr actbar s a partyw ho acc ept s benef i t s undera contr actfr om q u esti o n ing the c o n tr ac t’ s ex ist en ce , v ali d ity , o r ef fe ct). 

## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS

OF TE XAS N O . P D - 0364- 10
JUL I O C ESA R PU EN TE , A ppe l l ant

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS ON S TATE’ S PET I TI ON FOR DI S CRETI ON ARY REVI EW FROM THE FOURTEENTH CO URT O F AP PEALS

HA RRI S CO UNTY K EASLE R , J. , f

i l e d a c onc ur r i ng o pi ni on i n w hi c h K ELL ER , P. J. , and H ERVEY , J ., jo in e d . CO NC UR RI NG OP I NI ON I w oul d hol d thatJ ul i o C es arPuent e i s es t opped fr om chal l engi ng hi s s ent ence as i l l egal
. A s the rec or d cl ear l ys how s , Puent e and the St at e r eac hed an a gr eementw her eby

1 Puent e pl ed gui l tyi n excha nge forthe St at e’ s cons i derat ion to abandon the al l egat i on t hatP U E N T E C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N —2

the vi ct i m w as unders i x y ear s ol d, w hi ch r ai s ed the mi ni m um puni sh m en t t o tw enty - fi ve y e a rs’ im p riso n m e n t. P u e n te w a s p u n ish e d in a c c o rd a n c e w ith th e a g r e e m e n t an d h is p u n ish m e n t f

o r th e les se r-in c lu d e d o f f e n se w a s a u th o riz e d
. It is a b su rd to p e rm it P u e n te to att ack the pr opr i ety of hi s s ent ence on the bas i s that the i ndi ctm entw as notpr oper l yamended underthe t erm s of the pl ea a gr eement . T her e i s no r eas on t o hes i t at e t o hol d Puent e t o t he ter m s o f th e v a lid p lea b a rg a in a g re e m e n t. W e sh o u ld n o t b e a d d re ss in g th e m e rits o f h is cl ai m underthes e ci r cumst ance s , and the court of appea l s s houl d have decl i ned t o do s o as
w e ll.

DATE DE LIVERED: September 22, 2010 PUBLI SH
Exhibit 99.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David N. Pierce, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ David N. Pierce
-------------------------
David N. Pierce
Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FX Energy, Inc. and will be retained by FX Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Steven C. McNeal, Vice President and Treasurer of Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of November 6, 2009 between Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 28, 2019





By: /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3687 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3687

To direct the Office for Victims of Crime of the Department of Justice 
    to implement anti-trafficking recommendations of the Government 
                         Accountability Office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2024

  Mr. Ossoff (for himself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Office for Victims of Crime of the Department of Justice 
    to implement anti-trafficking recommendations of the Government 
                         Accountability Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Child Trafficking Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the term ``anti-trafficking recommendations'' means 
the recommendations set forth in the report of the Government 
Accountability Office entitled ``Child Trafficking: Addressing 
Challenges to Public Awareness and Survivor Support'', which was 
published on December 11, 2023.

SEC. 3. IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-TRAFFICKING PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Office for Victims of Crime of the 
Department of Justice, in coordination with the Office on Trafficking 
in Persons of the Administration for Children and Families, shall 
implement the anti-trafficking recommendations.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 60 days after the date on which the 
Office for Victims of Crime implements the anti-trafficking 
recommendations pursuant to subsection (a), the Director of the Office 
for Victims of Crime shall submit a report to the Committee on the 
Judiciary of the Senate and Committee on the Judiciary of the House of 
Representatives that explicitly describes the steps taken by the Office 
to complete such implementation.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of FX Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas B. Lovejoy,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas B. Lovejoy
--------------------------
Thomas B. Lovejoy
Chief Financial Officer
October 8, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# 002 DT 2023
#### Ronald E. VAN WART, Relator, v. R. H. AMIDON, Judge, Criminal Court of Record, Polk County, Bartow, Florida.

No. 39589.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1, 1970.

Ronald E. Van Wart, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Tampa, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner. is presently serving a five-year sentence in the Tennessee State Penitentiary at Nashville, Tennessee. He has sought writ of mandamus to compel the State of Florida to grant him a speedy trial on the charge lodged against him in the Criminal Court of Record, Polk County, Florida. He states that his motion for a fair and speedy trial was “taken under advisement” on August 4, 1969, and that subsequently, on December 7, 1969, he received a letter from the Judge of the Criminal Court of Record stating that his motion would be placed in the file and upon release from the Tennessee State Penitentiary his case would be set for trial.

This Court issued writ of mandamus under the rule set out in Dickey v. Circuit Court, 200 So.2d 521 (Fla.1967). Subsequently, we received a letter from the Honorable Gordon MacCalla, County Solicitor of Polk County dated June 10, 1970, as follows:

> “The office of the County Solicitor of Polk County, Florida, is, this date, initiating a request through the Governor of *150the State of Florida to the Governor of the State of Tennessee to obtain the custody of said Ronald E. Van Wart, together with one Thomas Franklin Williamson, in order that they may be given a speedy trial.”

It thus appears that the peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue and that the alternative writ of mandamus should be and is hereby, discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan 

Item #27

27.0 

Deterministic projections of the sensitivity of the plan’s solvency ratio throughout the extended period by 

taking into account more conservative assumptions of investment experience and future contribution base 

units than assumed elsewhere in the application. 

See section 6.04. 

The information is provided in document number 26.1 (Application under ERISA Section 305(e)(9) and 

IRC Section 432(e)(9)).
#### Irving M. MOSKOVITZ, Appellant, v. BRINKS SIGNAL CO., Inc., Appellee.

No. 69-668.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1971.

William A. Gillen, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Kinney, Tampa, Jack B. McPherson, of Allgood, McPherson & Cobb, New Port Richey, and Marks, Gray, Yates, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Thomas A. Clark, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellee.

*267PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brinks Signal Co. v. Criswell, Fla.App., 245 So.2d 265, opinion filed February 19, 1971.

PIERCE, C. J., and *MANN,*J., and BEACH, ROBERT E., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Charles E. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1541.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Chief, Appellate Division, and Laurie Sistrunk, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting in part:

The appellant, Charles E. Jones, was convicted of two counts' of shooting into a dwelling and is here challenging the sufficiency of the evidence identifying him as the guilty party. I believe the evidence as to Count I was insufficient. The state relied on circumstantial evidence. That evidence revealed that the dwelling house of Mr. and Mrs. Linton King was shot into on January 29 and February 3, 1976. As to the January 29 episode, which formed the basis for Count I, the only evidence identifying Jones as the offender was his ownership of the weapon that fired the shot. Other evidence produced at the trial showed that Jones’ father had threatened the Kings. When circumstantial evidence is relied upon to sustain a conviction, the proof must exclude any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. *Mayo*v. *State,*71 So.2d 899 (Fla.1954). The circumstantial evidence presented here simply falls short.
Alaska Ironworkers Pension Plan

Application for benefit suspension

Equitable impact of proposed suspension plan &

Demonstration of distribution of benefit suspensions

Attachment to Item 12

Total Participants*                         823

Beneficiaries                            64

QDRO alternate payees                            14

Average pre‐suspension benefit                 1,012.56

Average post‐suspension benefit                    794.02

Average reduction ‐22%

ReducƟon to present value of accrued benefits as of July 1, 2016            20,501,767

*Includes beneficiaries and QDRO alternate payees

Suspension percentage Participant Count

0% 166

>0% but <5% 23

>=5% but <10% 32

>=10% but <15% 20

>=15% but <20% 26

>=20% but <25% 25

>=25% but <26.5% 14

=26.5% 517

Exhibit 8 AIPT 136