alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62032-62033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-69-000]


Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC, Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 5, 1997, Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, 
LLC, (GBGP) 701 Poydras, New Orleans, Louisiana filed in the above 
docket an application, pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the

[[Page 62033]]

Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for authorization to 
establish a new delivery point at Garden Banks Block 128 ``A'' 
Platform. GBGP states that it will construct and operate the new 
delivery point under the blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos. 
CP96-678-000 and CP96-679-000 , all as more fully set forth in the 
request which is file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity is deemed to be authorized 
effective on the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30464 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10189

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

IVAN DAYLE NORTH,

doing business as Air Space Supply, Inc.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-96-1-A

- - - - - - - - - -

December 11, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ivan North appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to

mail fraud. North contends that the district court erred in

calculating the loss which resulted from his conduct. North also

contends that the district court failed to make adequate factual

findings when it enhanced his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a)

for being an organizer or leader of criminal activity that was

otherwise extensive.
No. 97-10189 

-2-

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and hold that the district court’s loss calculation was not

clearly erroneous. See United States v. Brown, 7 F.3d 1155, 1159

(5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Marcus, 82 F.3d 606, 610 (4th

Cir. 1996). We further hold that the district court sufficiently

articulated the factual basis for its finding that North was an

organizer or leader of criminal activity that was otherwise

extensive. Moreover, the district court’s finding was not

clearly erroneous. See United States v. Allibhai, 939 F.2d 244,

252-53 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Pierce, 893 F.2d 669,

676-77 (5th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael Toups, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that the annual report on Form 10-K of China Bilingual Technology & Education Group Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Bilingual Technology & Education Group Inc.





Dated: March 31, 2011
By:
/s/ Michael ToupsMichael ToupsChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1682 

To provide emergency rural housing assistance to respond to the COVID19 pandemic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. CLEAVER (for himself and Ms. WATERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To provide emergency rural housing assistance to respond 

to the COVID-19 pandemic, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stabilizing Rural 

5 Homeowners During COVID Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RELIEF MEASURES FOR SECTION 502 AND 504 DI7 RECT LOAN BORROWERS. 

8 (a) APPROPRIATION.—In addition to amounts other9 wise made available, there is appropriated for fiscal year 

10 2021, out of funds in the Treasury not otherwise approVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:39 May 06, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1682.IH H1682

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1682 IH

1 priated, $39,000,000, to remain available until September 

2 30, 2023, for direct loans made under sections 502 and 

3 504 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472, 1474). 

4 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—The Secretary 

5 may use not more than 3 percent of the amounts appro6 priated under this section for administrative purposes. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Robert J. Landis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comprehensive Care Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants third fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Robert J. LandisApril 7, 2005
    
    Robert J. LandisChairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT
        32.01**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial
        Corp.
        (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
        Pagano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
        18
        U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 By:
        /s/
        William Pagano
 Name:
        William Pagano
 Chief Executive Officer
 Date: May 21, 2007
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

DCX-CHOL Enterprises, Inc. 

Under Contract No. SPE4A6-15-D-0007 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60655 

James S. DelSordo, Esq. 

Argus Legal, PLLC 

Manassas, VA 

Daniel K. Poling, Esq. 

DLA Chief Trial Attorney 

Edward R. Murray, Esq. 

Elan D. Taylor, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

DLA Aviation 

Richmond, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's 

docket with prejudice. 

Dated: 29 August 2016 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60655, Appeal of DCX-CHOL 

Enterprises, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominos Pizza, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 11, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry J. Silverman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Harry J. SilvermanHarry J. SilvermanChief Financial Officer




Dated: October 25, 2005



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Dominos Pizza, Inc. and will be retained by Dominos Pizza, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29115]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[(CA-067-5101-01-B091); CACA-38448]

Proposed Plan Amendment

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Bureau of Land Management 
(BLM) has proposed a plan amendment to the California Desert 
Conservation Area Plan to partially exempt a proposed fiber optic cable 
right-of-way from a utility corridor for a portion of the proposed 
alignment.

DATES: Written scoping comments must be received no later than December 
3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written scoping comments should be addressed to the District 
Manager, Attn: Plan Amendment, California Desert District, 6221 Box 
Springs Blvd., California 92507.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James L. Williams (909) 697-5390.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposed fiber optic cable from Las Vegas, 
Nevada, utilizes a conduit along Highway 95 to near the Nevada-
California State line. In California, it would continue down Highway 95 
and then within Goffs road. This alignment is not designated as a 
utility corridor by the California Desert Plan. The proposed right-of-
way is within utility corridors H, G, and O until near the city of 
Adelanto where the proposed right-of-way leaves corridor O and 
continues within county roads which are not a designated utility 
corridor to Palmdale.
    Individual respondents may request confidentiality. If you wish to 
withhold your name or street address from public review or from 
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, you must state this 
prominently at the beginning of your written comment. Such requests 
will be honored to the extent allowed by law. All submissions from 
organizations or business, and from individuals identifying themselves 
as representatives or officials of organization or business, will be 
made available for public inspection in their entirety.

    Dated: October 29, 1997.
Alan Stein,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-29115 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
```
Exhibit 23.02








Hohn Engineering,PLLC2708 1st Avenue North, Suite 200Billings, MT  59101Tel 406-655-3381
Fax 406-655-3383
Email: hohneng@hohneng.com




















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS








We hereby consent to the use of the name Hohn Engineering, PLLC and of references to Hohn Engineering, PLLC and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or information contained therein, dated February 10, 2011, prepared for FX Energyin the FX Energy, Inc. annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31st December 2010, and the incorporation by reference to the report prepared by Hohn Engineering, PLLC into FX Energy, Inc.'s previously filed registration statements listed below:








Form
SEC File No.
Effective DateS-3
333-155718
June 29, 2009S-3
333-171029
December 7, 2010S-8
333-112717
February 11, 2004S-8
333-128299
September 14, 2005








HOHN ENGINEERING, PLLC





/s/ Thomas K. Hohn








Thomas K. Hohn


Registered Professional Petroleum Engineer


March 9, 2011
#### Bob Clark PUTNAM v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39183.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 23, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 60.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46299-46300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18636]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Second Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 230, Airborne Weather 
Detection Systems Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Second Meeting Airborne Weather Detection Systems Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
second meeting of the Airborne Weather Detection Systems Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 9-10, 2014 from 9:00 a.m.-
5:00 p.m. and September 11th, 2014 from 9:00 a.m.-3:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:

September 9th

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Agenda Overview
 Meeting 1 Minutes approval
 Review of General Requirements sections
 Lunch
 Review of PWS sections
 Review of Turbulence sections

September 10th

 Review of Turbulence sections cont.
 Review of Test Procedures sections
 Lunch
 Review of Test Procedures sections cont.
 Review of Operational and Installed sections

September 11th

 DO-213 discussion
 Review of Atmospheric Threat sections
 Lunch
 Action Item Review
 Other Actions
 Date and Place of Next Meetings
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

[[Page 46300]]

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 31, 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-18636 Filed 8-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33499]


Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated--Trackage Rights 
Exemption--llinois Central Railroad Company

    Illinois Central Railroad Company (IC) has agreed to grant non-
exclusive overhead trackage rights to Grand Trunk Western Railroad 
Incorporated (GTW) over 7.83 miles of IC's mainline track between IC's 
connection with GTW at Harvey, IL (milepost 19.77) and IC's connection 
with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NS) at Chicago, IL (milepost 
11.94), with the right to move from either milepost 19.77 or milepost 
11.94 to IC's connection with the Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company 
(IHB) at HiLawn/140th Street in Riverdale, IL (milepost 17.77).
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after November 
4, 1997, the effective date of the exemption.
    The purpose of the local trackage rights is to enable GTW (1) to 
expedite movement of predominantly automotive traffic to NS at Calumet 
Yard in Chicago, IL, and to move light locomotives back, and (2) to 
access the IHB.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33499, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Robert P. vom Eigen, Hopkins & Sutter, 888 Sixteenth Street, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20006.

    Decided: October 31, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29491 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### William D. HAIRSTON et al. v. Brenda Diane BELL.

No. 47154.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 28, 1973.

Judgment Corrected June 18, 1973.

Bogen & Bogen, Greenville, for appellants.

Townsend & McWilliams, Drew, Watkins & Eager, Velia Ann Mayer, W. E. Sud-dath, Jr., Jackson, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and ROBERTSON, JJ.

SMITH, Justice:

ON MOTION TO CORRECT JUDGMENT

This case was affirmed on a former day without an opinion. A motion to correct judgment has now been filed by Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, cross-appellant, which must be sustained in part.

The appeal was from the action of the Chancery Court of Sunflower County, declaring that appellee, Brenda Diane Bell, was the named beneficiary in, and entitled to the proceeds of, a policy of life insurance issued to Grenada Bank by Equitable Life Assurance Society on its employees, including Lillian H. Moore, the beneficiary’s aunt, Lillian H. Moore having died. We adhere to our conclusion that the chancellor, on the evidence, was correct in so finding.

Upon the death of Lillian H. Moore, Equitable paid the proceeds of the policy into court with its bill impleading the possible claimants.

Cross-appellant, in its motion, has pointed out that we failed to deal with certain points raised by it. We now proceed to do so, and reverse the decree on cross-appeal in the following specific respects only:'

(1) Equitable is not liable for, and shall not be assessed with, interest upon the impleaded funds beyond the date on which it paid such funds into court;

(2) The judgment entered against Equitable for the proceeds of its policy is reversed, and instead it is ordered that the impleaded funds be and are awarded to Brenda Diane Bell and shall be paid to her as the party entitled thereto; and

(3) Court costs are adjudged against the unsuccessful claimants to the proceeds of the policy.

In all other respects the decree appealed from is affirmed.

It is ordered that the judgment in this case be amended to conform herewith.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

All Justices concur.