alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Steven C. McNeal, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.





Date:  March 28, 2019








By: /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer


of Entergy Texas, Inc., as Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the servicing


function)
#### F. T. Aubuchon, Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*St. Louis & Iron Mountain Railroad Co., Defendant in Error.

1. *Practice, civil*— Pleading—Statement *of cause of action.*— The petition alleged that the defendant, a railroad company, negligently and carelessly ran over and killed some of the cattle of the plaintiff, and that the same was done at a part of the road that was not enclosed by a lawful fence, and that was not a public road 'crossing. *Held,*that the petition set out a good cause of action.

*Error to Washington Circuit Court.*

*G. I. Van*filien, for Plaintiff in Error.

“Negligence may be established, either by proof of the facts and circumstances attending the transaction, or by showing that the injury was done on a part of the road not enclosed by a lawful fence, or not on the crossing of a public highway.” (Calvert vs. Hannibal & St. Joe. E. E. Co. 38 Mo., 467.)

This petition was drawn in accordance with the opinion of this court as expressed in the same case reported 34 Mo. 242.

*Dry den fy*Dryden, for Defendant in Error.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is utterly impossible to sustain the judgment of the court below in this case. The petition alleged, that defendant negligently and carelessly ran over, maimed, and hilled, certain cattle belonging to the plaintiff, and that the same was done on a part of its road that Avas not enclosed by a lawful fence and that was not a public road crossing. At the trial the court refused to permit the plaintiff to introduce any evidence to sustain his averments, on the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action.

This ruling was certainly erroneous. The pleading set out a good cause of action and the judgment will be reversed and the case remanded.

The other Judges concur ; except Judge Sherwood, absent.
Code Green Apparel Corp. 10-Q


Exhibit 10.25


 


 


 






    


     

    

 


 


 






    2


     

    

 


 


 






    3


     

    

 


 


 






    4


     

    

 


 


 






    5


     

    

 


 


 






    7


     

    

 


 


 






    8


     

    

 


 


 






    9
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30068]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC98-6-000]


American Ref-fuel Company of Essex County, Air Products Ref-fuel 
of Essex County, Inc., Duke/UAE Ref-Fuel LLC, and Duke/UAE Essex LLC; 
Notice of Filing

November 10, 1997.
    Take notice that American Ref-fuel Company of Essex County, Air 
Products Ref-fuel of Essex County, Inc., Duke/UAE Ref-Fuel LLC, and 
Duke/UAE Essex LLC, on November 5, 1997, tendered for filing, at the 
request of Commission staff, a Purchase Agreement reflecting the 
disposition for which Commission approval is sought in this docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before November 17, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30068 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana In the Interest of Russell GIANGROSSO, Lonnie Gros and Scott Hood.

No. 62835.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana, through Aubert J. Talbot, District Attorney, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order. Parish of Ascension. 361 So.2d 259.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable A. J. Kling, Jr., Judge of the Ascension Parish Court for the Parish of Ascension, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 15th day of September, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a day to be fixed by this court, 1978, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
#### Otis McCALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-789.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.19



Loan Contract



Through amiable and fully
negotiation, Sanhe City Lucksky Electrical Engineering Limited Company (hereafter referred to as the Borrower) and Lucksky Kelitai
Air Power Machinery Co., Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the Lender) come into the following Contract to perform:



Art. 1.On July
18, 2013, the Lender lent RMB Seven Million Seven Hundred and Twenty Two Thousand Only (in words) (¥7,722,000)
to the Borrower for purchasing equipment. The repayment deadline is December 31, 2014.



Art. 2. The Lender
shall lend money to the Borrower strictly in accordance with the national credit policies and plans. Otherwise, the Lender shall
pay the Borrower penalty by day based on the default amount. The calculation of default amount will be the same as that of interest
amount for overdue loan.



Art.3.The Borrower
is willing to abide by relevant loan regulations of the Lender and use the loan for the Contract regulated purpose. Otherwise,
the Lender will take back the already lent money immediately or earlier than schedule.



Art. 4. The Borrower
shall guarantee to repay the loan principal in time. If delay is inevitable, the Borrower shall provide written application before
loan maturity. Only after the Lender agrees its delay application and signs the delay repayment agreement, can the Borrower delay
the repayment. In case the Borrower doesn’t provide delay application or both parties don’t come into a delay agreement,
the Lender will require the Borrower paying another 0.1% of the default amount as interest from the maturity time.



Art. 5. In case
of any disputes, both parties shall negotiate with each for solution. If the negotiation fails, the second way shall be taken for
solution:



1. Apply to the Sanhe Arbitration
Committee for arbitration;



2. Apply to the People’s
Court for prosecution.



Art. 6. This Contract
will come into effect from the signing date.



This Contract is in duplication
with each party holding one copy.





|Lender (official seal):
        
        
        Legal Representative:
        
        
        
        Borrower (official seal):
        
        
        Legal Representative:
        
        
        Date: July 18, 2013 | Description: Z:\Vineyard\Live Jobs\2015\04 Apr\21 Apr\Shift I\v407802_Xiangtian - 10-KA\Draft\03-Production\tex10-19seal.jpg
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.56 N 76.20 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
# L_2005084EN.01002201.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/22

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 495/2005 of 30 March 2005 derogation from Regulation (EC) No 824/2000 as regards the period for delivering cereals into intervention in some Member States in the 2004/2005 marketing year

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 82 of 31 March 2005
  )

On page 5, in Article 1, sixth line:

for:

‘... the end of the sixth month following ...’,

read:

‘... the end of the seventh month following ...’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-2-110-001]


Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

October 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 21, 1997, Iroquois Gas Transmission 
System, L.P. (Iroquois) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Eighteenth Revised Sheet 
No. 4, with a proposed effective date of November 1, 1997.
    Iroquois states that pursuant to Part 154 of the Commission's 
regulations and Section 12.3 of the General Terms and Conditions of its 
tariff, Iroquois is filing the referenced tariff sheet and supporting 
workpapers as part of its annual update of its Deferred Asset Surcharge 
to reflect the annual revenue requirement associated with its Deferred 
Asset for the amortization period commencing November 1, 1997. Iroquois 
states that the substitute tariff sheet corrects an error contained in 
its original filing. The revised tariff sheet reflects an increase of 
$.0001 per Dth in Iroquois' effective Deferred Asset Surcharge for Zone 
2 of $.0001 per Dth (from $.0006 to $.0007 per Dth), and an increase in 
the Inter-Zone surcharge of $.0001 per Dth (from $.0015 to $.0016 per 
Dth). Iroquois requests a waiver of Section 154.207 of the Commission's 
regulations to permit the tariff sheet to become effective on November 
1, 1997.
    Iroquois states that copies of its filing were served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should filed a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All such protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-28845 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Eva Nero VALLERY v. CITY OF CROWLEY and Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York.

No. 61942.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Eva Nero Yallery applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Acadia No. 6367.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
#### Brenda Joyce McCORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-24.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 1973.

James Ron Shelley, Public Defender, Daniel C. Campbell, Asst. Public Defender, and Brenda Joyce McCord, In pro. per. for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, *61and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60696-60697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29681]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-57-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Application

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
500 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243, filed in Docket No. 
CP98-57-000 an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas 
Act for permission and approval to abandon a natural gas transportation 
service for Indiana Glass Company (IGC), all as more fully set forth in 
the application on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    ANR states that by mutual agreement ANR and IGC have agreed to 
abandon Rate Schedule X-143 under which ANR transports up to 4,500 
dekatherms of natural gas per day on a best efforts basis for IGC from 
various wells in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas to an interconnection with 
Indiana Gas Company, Inc. in Delaware County, Indiana.
    ANR further states that no facilities are proposed to be abandoned 
and that the proposal will have no impact on the environment.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before November 26, 1997, 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be 
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing

[[Page 60697]]

to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for ANR to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29681 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# EUR-Lex - 32005R1778 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32005R1778

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1778/2005 of 28 October 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables **

*
Official Journal L 288 , 29/10/2005 P. 0010 - 0011 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1778/2005

of 28 October 2005

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables [1], and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in the Annex thereto.

(2) In compliance with the above criteria, the standard import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. Silva Rodríguez

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

[1] OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

--------------------------------------------------

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 28 October 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(EUR/100 kg) |

CN code | Third country code | Standard import value |

07020000 | 052 | 60,6 |

096 | 33,2 |

204 | 39,1 |

999 | 44,3 |

07070005 | 052 | 108,7 |

999 | 108,7 |

07099070 | 052 | 107,0 |

204 | 43,6 |

999 | 75,3 |

08055010 | 052 | 77,8 |

388 | 59,6 |

524 | 66,9 |

528 | 56,2 |

999 | 65,1 |

08061010 | 052 | 97,2 |

400 | 190,1 |

508 | 241,7 |

512 | 92,7 |

999 | 155,4 |

08081080 | 052 | 57,2 |

388 | 83,8 |

400 | 98,2 |

404 | 120,6 |

512 | 69,8 |

720 | 51,9 |

800 | 192,5 |

804 | 67,2 |

999 | 92,7 |

08082050 | 052 | 99,8 |

720 | 84,1 |

999 | 92,0 |

[1] Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code "999" stands for "of other origin".

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29853]



[[Page 60912]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 19, 1997.
    Time: 12 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Salvador H. Cuellar, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; Telephone: 301, 443-4868.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 4, 1997.
    Time: 10 a.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Phyllis D. Artis, Parklawn, Room 9C-26, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; Telephone: 301, 443-6470.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282).

    Dated: November 6, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29853 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Christopher E. CLAWSON and Dennis M. Cochrane, Petitioners, v. Paul BAKER, Judge of the Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 40741.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 3, 1971.

Bernard Berman, Miami, for petitioners.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

*225PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus wherein Petitioners, charged with a crime, seek an alternative writ commanding the Respondent Judge to either dismiss a criminal case or show cause why he has not done so. The petition is denied and the proceedings are dismissed, on the authority of Clawson et al. v. Baker, Fla., 245 So.2d 224, (opinion filed March 3, 1971).

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.