alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

AL 49 County Road 25, 27, 3 Bridge 

Replacements Bridge Replacements US Forest ServiceConecuh National Forest

Covington 

County Covington

PE 2023 

CN 2024

AL 51 Welcome Center Parking Lot Parking Lot 

Enhancements

National Park ServiceSelma to Montgomery 

National Historic Trail

City of Selma Dallas PE 2024 

CN 2025

AL 52 South Sandy Road

Roadway Resurfacing 

and Drainage 

Improvements

US Forest ServiceTalladega National ForestTuscaloosa 

County Tuscaloosa PE 2023 

CN 2024

AL 54 Forest Service Road 265 Roadway Resurfacing US Forest ServiceBankhead National Forest

Lawrence 

County Lawrence CN 2026

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the Alabama Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the Alabama FLAP are listed below by application number and include:

Alabama Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2023-2026

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The Alabama PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please bookmark our webpage to watch for 

future Calls for Projects in your state. https://higways.dot.gov/federal-lands/programs-access/al

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61489-61490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30223]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This collection has been submitted under 
the emergency Paperwork Reduction Act procedures.
    Agency: Minority Business Development Agency.
    Title: Competitive Application Packages for Funding to Operate 
Technical Assistance Projects (SF-424 and the Evaluation Criteria).
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0640-0006.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired--Emergency Review.
    Burden: 12,000 hours annually.
    Number of Respondents: 180.

[[Page 61490]]

    Avg. Hours per Response: Ranges between 40 and 80 hours.
    Needs and Uses: This collection of information is required as it is 
the vehicle through which the Agency presents detailed application 
requirements for financial assistance awards to operate its Business 
Development Centers. These centers provide business development 
services, such as financial planning and marketing advice, to minority 
entrepreneurs. The collection of this information is essential to the 
mission of the Agency, as defined in Executive Order 11625, to provide 
management and technical assistance to minority businesses.
    Affective Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit and 
not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: Victoria Baecher-Wassmer or Pat Boyd (202) 395-
5871.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, Departmental Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 5312, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Victoria Baecher-Wassmer or Pat Boyd, OMB 
Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503. An emergency approval has been 
requested by November 19, 1997.

    Dated: November 12, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 97-30223 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

ROBERT KING, § 

§ No. 589, 2016 

 Defendant-Below, § 

 Appellant, § 

§ Court Below – Superior Court 

v. § for the State of Delaware 

 § 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1208013187 (K) 

 § 

 Plaintiff-Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

Submitted: June 14, 2017 

Decided: June 28, 2017 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and SEITZ, Justices; 

CLARK, SURLES, Judges,

 constituting the Court en Banc. 

ORDER 

 This 28th day of June 2017, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Superior 

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its November 

16, 2016 Order. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice 

 



 Sitting by designation under Del. Const. art. IV, § 12.
#### Bobby RAWLEY in lieu of Cullen Rawley, Deceased v. BOGALUSA LOAN CORP. and Betty Seals Rawley, Defendant, First State Bank and Trust in lieu of Benj. W. Miller, Deceased, Third Party Defendant.

No. 62054.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Bogalusa Loan Corporation, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Washington.

Writ denied. Under the facts of this case, the result is correct.

DIXON, J., would grant.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTEROF Air Medical Resource Group, Inc. Respondent FAA DocketNo. 2014WP910076 (Civil Penalty Proceeding) DMS NO. FAA-2014-0551 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE Honorable Douglas M. Rawald



### RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF HEARING REQUEST PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that Air Medical Resource Group, Inc., Respondent herein, by and through undersigned counsel, pursmmt to the Rules ofPractice (14 C.F.R. Part 13), hereby withdraws its request for a hearing inthis matter. The parties have reached a settlement. As a result, a hearing onthe me;its is no ionger necessary. 

### WHEREFORE, Respondent, Air Medical Resource c., respectfully requests thatthe above-captioned matterbe terminated with pre' Datedthis 3'd day ofMay 2016.

e ory S. in ton, Esq. he · ionLawFirm 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 21401 Tel: (301) 294-8550 Fax: (301) 294-2525 Email: Qreg@AviationLawExperts.com

Counsel for RespondentCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that I have this date sent via facsimile andby U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid, illl original and one copy ofthe foregoing Respondent'sNotice of Withdrawal of HearingRequest addressed to: ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000 Fax: (202) 493-5142 And, further, that I have this date sentby facsimile transmission and U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, a copy ofthe foregoing addressed to: ONE COPY Kyle Lomazow General Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel FAA NorthwestMountain Region 1601 LindAve. SW,ANM-7 Renton, W A 98057 Tel: (425) 227-1847 Fax: (425) 227-1007 ONE COPY The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation l200NewJersey Ave, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536 Dated: May 3, 2016



### 2 Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 21401 Tel: (301) 294-8550 Fax: (301) 294-2525
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1801 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1801

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
 children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

   Ms. Brownley (for herself, Mr. Pappas, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Ryan, Mrs. 
  Kirkpatrick, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. Norton, Mrs. Hayes, and Mr. 
  Hastings) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
 children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CHAMPVA Children's Care Protection 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL CARE 
              UNDER CHAMPVA PROGRAM.

    (a) Increase.--Subsection (c) of section 1781 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c)(1) Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (iii) of section 101(4)(A) 
of this title and except as provided in paragraph (2), for purposes of 
this section, a child is eligible for benefits under subsection (a) 
until the child's 26th birthday, regardless of the child's marital 
status.
    ``(2) This subsection shall not be construed to limit eligibility 
for benefits under subsection (a) of a child described in section 
101(4)(A)(ii) of this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Such subsection, as so amended, shall apply 
with respect to medical care provided on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEGUNDO MARCELO ANGAMARCA

LLIVICURA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71820

Agency No. A097-526-092

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 25, 2014** 

Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Segundo Marcelo Angamarca Llivicura, a native and citizen of Ecuador,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed

by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

FILED

JUN 26 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
reopen. Andia v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 1181, 1184 (9th Cir. 2004) (per curiam). We

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying for lack of prejudice

Angamarca Llivicura’s motion to reopen based on a claim of ineffective assistance

of counsel. See Montes-Lopez v. Holder, 694 F.3d 1085, 1090 (9th Cir. 2012)

(“[A] petitioner must show prejudice to prevail on a claim [of] ineffective

assistance of counsel . . . .”). As to Angamarca Llivicura’s first prior attorney, the

BIA’s previous decision reopening removal proceedings based on Angamarca

Llivicura’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel cured any prejudice arising

from that attorney’s errors. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 748 (9th Cir.

2004) (observing that reopening can “cure” previous defective representation). As

to his second prior attorney, Angamarca Llivicura did not explain how any

testimony that his siblings were unable to present due to that attorney’s alleged

errors might have altered the agency’s determination that he had failed to

demonstrate sufficient hardship to qualify for cancellation of removal. See

Mohsseni Behbahani v. INS, 796 F.2d 249, 251 (9th Cir. 1986) (concluding that the

petitioner’s failure to “describe the evidence that [his counsel] incompetently failed

to introduce” prevented the court from finding prejudice).

2 13-71820
In light of this disposition, we need not evaluate Angamarca Llivicura’s

compliance with the procedural requirements for filing an ineffective-assistance

claim. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004).

Angamarca Llivicura’s assertions regarding hardship lie beyond the scope of

our review. See Andia, 359 F.3d at 1184 (“In reviewing the decision of the BIA,

we consider only the grounds relied upon by that agency.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 13-71820
##### 



COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive Care Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2004 (the Report),
Mary Jane Johnson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Mary Jane JohnsonMary Jane JohnsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 7, 2004
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Comprehensive Care
Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 18
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission For OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Order/Notice to Withhold Income for Child Support.
    OMB No.: 0970-0154.
    Description: The child support enforcement agency needs the 
information to process court/tribunal administered direct income 
withholding orders to collect support. The form will provide employers 
with the required amounts to deduct child support payment from an 
employee's/obligor's income.
    Respondents: State, Local or Tribal Governments.

                                             Annual Burden Estimates                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of      Average burden                 
                 Instrument                      Number of      responses per      hours per       Total burden 
                                                respondents       respondent        response          hours     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order/Notice................................              54            1,620            .1666           14,579 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 14,579.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, Division of Information Resource 
Management Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.

OMB Comment

    OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of 
information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document 
in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having 
its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of 
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: Desk Officer for ACF.

    Dated: November 12, 1997.
Bob Sargis,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30219 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 17 339 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16

- cr - 00220

- WSD

- JFK

- 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus LEODEGARIO AMBRIZ

- GUZMAN , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georg ia

________________________ ( August 3, 2017 ) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and FAY , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Leodegario Ambriz

- Guzman appeals his sentence of 37 month s of imprisonment for reentering the United States illegally a second time after being

Case: 16-17339 Date Filed: 08/03/2017 Page: 1 of 32 d eported for an aggravated felony. 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) , (b)(2)

. Ambriz challenges the substantive reasonableness of his sentence. We affirm. In 1998, Ambriz , a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without permission and, in 2004, he was convicted of trafficking more than 400 grams of cocaine . After Ambriz served four years of his twelve

- year sentence , officials deported him to Mexico

. Three months later, Ambriz attempted to reenter th e United States , but officials app rehended him at the border and he was convicted of reentering the country illegally . After he serv ed 33 months in prison, Ambriz was deported again to his homeland . Undeterred, Ambriz re entered the United States illegally a second time , and when confronted by Georgia officers, he lied about his identity and possessed fal s e identification documents. The district court did not abuse its discretion. The district court reasonably determined that a sentence at the low end of Ambriz’s advisory guideline range o f 37 to 46 months of imprisonment was required to account for his criminal history , t o reflect the seriousness of and to punish him for entering the United States illegally a third time, to deter him and other aliens from committing future similar offenses , and to promote respect for the law, which he had flouted by possessing
f

als e identification documents

. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553. Ambriz requested a downward variance to 24 months of imprisonment on the ground that he reenter ed the count r y to escape the carte l in his hometown of Morelia, but the district court

Case: 16-17339 Date Filed: 08/03/2017 Page: 2 of 33 was entitled to discredit Ambriz ’s argument because he acknowledged he could relocate to Mexico City

. Ambriz’s sentence, which is well below his maximum statutory sentence of 20 years of imprisonment, is reasonable. See United States v. Gonzalez , 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008)

. We AFFIRM Ambriz ’s sentence. Case: 16-17339 Date Filed: 08/03/2017 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Alyson M. Mount, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of November 6, 2009 between Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 29, 2017





By:  /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20

- 0382

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

vs.

QUINCY SMITH

,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26( 2 ), the Appellant is

given an extension of time until February 19 , 2020 , to prepare, file, and serve the

Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 20 2021

01/20/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0382
No. 9873.

#### Sonner *v.*Laser et al.

(Decided January 29, 1907.)

Error to Circuit Court of Richland County.

*Mr. H. T. Manner,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Laser, Huston & Marquis,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur,
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF STR HOLDINGS, INC.

Subsidiary

State or other
Jurisdiction of
IncorporationCal Safety Compliance Corporation

CaliforniaShuster Laboratories, Inc.

DelawareSpecialized Technology Resources Espana S.A.

SpainSpecialized Technology Resources (Florida), Inc.

FloridaSpecialized Technology Resources (Hong Kong) Limited

Hong KongSpecialized Technology Resources, Inc.

DelawareSpecialized Technology Resources (International), Inc.

DelawareSpecialized Technology Resources (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd

MalaysiaSpecialized Technology Resources (Shanghai) Ltd.

ChinaSpecialized Technology Resources (Singapore) Pte Ltd

SingaporeSpecialized Technology Resources (Taiwan) Limited

TaiwanSpecialized Technology Resources (UK) Limited

EnglandSTR Labs Pvt Ltd

IndiaSTR Laboratuar Hizmetleri A.S.

TurkeySTR Testing & Inspection AG

Switzerland


---



QuickLinks
#### Joseph BIZJAK, Appellant, v. MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 68-942.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 13, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.