alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4345-000]


OGE Energy Resources, Inc., Notice of Filing

November 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 29, 1997, OGE Energy Resources, Inc. 
(``OERI'') made a compliance filing with the Commission in the above-
referenced docket in accordance with the Commission's October 17, 1997 
order conditionally accepting for filing, without suspension or 
hearing, OERI's market-based power sales rates.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 21, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29951 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## PeaceHealth KetchikanMedicalCenter

November 24, 2014

Kevin Schlemmer, Chief EAS Division Office ofAviation Analysis US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Docket No. OST-1998-4899, Essential Air Service- Alaska Airlines Dear ChiefSchlemmer: The purpose of my lettertoday is to articulate my strong support for Alaska Airlines to continue to provide Essential Air Service to the communities in Southeast Alaska. Alaska Airlines has literally been the life's blood for these communities in many ways but in particularfrom my perspective as a key leader in helping patients access more definitive care than may be available in their own community. Ketchikan serves as one ofthe healthcare hubs for our State in our service to Southeast Alaska. In our role as recipient it is imperative thatthe capabilityto move patients in atimely manner exists. In addition, the fact thatthese patients then have continued critical access to higher levels ofcare throughout Alaska's extensive route network. In addition to the physical transport of people for care there is the issue ofdaily logistical support of medications, blood, supplies, equipment, etc. and often thetechnical staff associated with these needed elements in our communities. Alaska Airlines is an invaluable asset. From our perspective, Alaska Airline's service is critical to the health, safety, and lives ofour Southeast Alaska communities and we strongly supporttheir application to provide essential air services to Southeast Alaska. Cordially,

# f\J_c:)~(~\;;_) Ken Tonjes ChiefAdministrative Officer

3100 Tongass Avenue, Ketchikan, AK 99901 www.peacehealth.org 907-228-8300
Exhibit 99.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William J. Catacosinos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

/s/ William J. Catacosinos 

 

William J. Catacosinos 

Chief Executive Officer 

May 14, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Project No. 2042-008]


Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington; 
Notice Of Application For Approval of Contracts For The Sale Of Power 
for A Period Extending Beyond The Term of The License

November 6, 1997.
    On October 3, 1997, pursuant to Section 22 of the Federal Power 
Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 815, Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille 
County, Washington (Pend Oreille), filed an application requesting 
Commission approval of a contract for the sale of power from the Box 
Canyon Project No. 2042 for a period extending approximately three and 
one-half years beyond the January 30, 2002 expiration date of the 
license. The project is located on the Pend Oreille River in Pend 
Oreille County, Washington.
    Section 22 provides that contracts for the sale and delivery of 
power for periods extending beyond the termination date of a license 
may be entered into upon the joint approval of the Commission and the 
appropriate state public service commission or other similar authority 
in the state in which the sale or delivery of power is made. Pend 
Oreille states in its application that Commission approval of the power 
sales contract is in the public interest because the contract permitted 
Pend Oreille to finance the construction of the project when it did not 
have the necessary credit rating to do so independently.
    Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in 
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, 385.211 and 385.214. In determining the 
appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all protests 
and other comments, but only those who file a motion to intervene may 
became a party to the proceeding. Comments, protests, or motions to 
intervene must be filed by [the 30th day following publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register]; must bear in all capital letters the 
title ``COMMENTS,'' ``PROTEST,'' or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' as 
applicable, and ``Project No. 2042.'' Send the filings (original and 14 
copies) to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426. A copy of any filing must 
also be served upon each representative of the licensee specified in 
its application.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29806 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.34 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Protocol to the Treaty of 

December 1, 1994 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and HUNGARY 

Signed at Budapest November 15, 2005 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 HUNGARY 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Protocol to the treaty of December 1, 1994. 

Signed at Budapest November 15, 2005; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at Washington 

 June 10, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3590 

To prohibit the importation of garlic from the People’s Republic of China. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prohibit the importation of garlic from the People’s 

Republic of China. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping Eating Waste 

5 And Guarantee Excellence for Garlic Assurance and Regu6 latory Legislation to Inhibit Chinese Imports Act of 2024’’ 

7 or the ‘‘SEWAGE GARLIC Imports Act of 2024’’. 

8 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF GARLIC FROM 

9 THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

10 The importation of garlic that originates in the Peo11 ple’s Republic of China, whether fresh, peeled, frozen, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3590 IS

1 dried, dehydrated, toasted, roasted, packaged, in the form 

2 of an essential oil, or otherwise processed, is prohibited. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# Official Journal L 401/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 401 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6330 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 401

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6330 November 2020

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/1776 of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2020 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/1776 of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29684]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-200-026]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to be 
effective November 1, 1997:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 7A
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 7B
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 7E
Third Revised Sheet No. 7E.02
Second Revised Sheet No. 7F
Third Revised Sheet No. 7G
Third Revised Sheet No. 7G.01
Third Revised Sheet No. 7H
First Revised Sheet No. 7I
First Revised Sheet No. 7J
First Revised Sheet No. 7M
Original Sheet No. 7N

    NGT states that these tariff sheets, to be effective November 1, 
1997, reflect either contract expirations or elimination of formula-
based negotiated rates that are no longer applicable as the underlying 
rate agreements now reflect terms which do not qualify as negotiated 
rates. Furthermore, certain of these tariff sheets reflect 
modifications to existing negotiated rates terms as well as the 
addition of a new negotiated rate contract.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestant 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29684 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA STEFANOVA, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-70547 Agency No. A072-398-271
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 12, 2010 **

San Francisco, California Before: SILVERMAN, FISHER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Maria Stefanova petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and we deny the petition. 

# FILED
MAY 17 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 First, Stefanova disputes the BIA’s determinations that she failed to establish that she had been subject to past persecu tion and that she failed to establish a wellfounded fear of future persecution. These are factual findings, see Prasad v. INS , 47 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir. 1995), and we must uphold them unless “the evidence compels a different result,” Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft , 298 F.3d 888, 891 (9th Cir. 2002). Stefanova’s difficulties at work, her encounters with the Bulgarian police and the other experiences she credibly described do not compel a finding that she suffered past persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir. 2003) (“Persecution . . . is an extreme con cept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive.”) (internal quotation marks omitted); cf. id. at 1014-18 (holding that the record did not compel a finding of past persecution when petitioner credibly testified she had been harassed and fired at work, “pushed,” and threatened with death). Nor does the record compel a finding that Stefanova’s subjectively genuine fear of future persecution was objectively reasonable. Although members of minority Christian denominations conti nue to face hardships in post-Communist Bulgaria, the record does not compel a findi ng that those hardships rise to the level of persecutionon account of religion, and it therefore does not compel a finding3 that Stefanova’s subjective fear of futu re persecution is objectively reasonable. See Gormley v. Ashcroft , 364 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2004). Finally, Stefanova claims that the Immigration Judge (IJ) failed to provide her a “full and fair hearing of her claims and a reasonable opportunity to present evidence on her behalf.” See Cinapian v. Holder , 567 F.3d 1067, 1073 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Colmenar v. INS , 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000)). The record does not support that claim. The agency is presumed to have reviewed the evidence before it, see Larita-Martinez v. INS , 220 F.3d 1092,1095-96 (9th Cir. 2000), and the BIA and IJ’s decisions are c onsistent with that presumption. Nor does the record suggest that the IJ unduly rushed Stefanova or prevented her from presenting witnesses or evidence. PETITION DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Trinity Gas Corporation; Order of Suspension of Trading

November 6, 1997.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Trinity Gas Corporation, a Nevada corporation with executive offices 
located at One Center Ave., Nationsbank Plaza, Suite 200, Brownwood, 
Texas 76801, and that questions have been raised about recent market 
activity in the securities of the company and the adequacy of publicly 
disseminated information concerning, among other things, the valuation 
of the company's assets, the results of its business operations, and 
the recent resignation of its auditors.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, It Is Ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. (EST), on November 
6, 1997, through 11:59 p.m. (EST), on November 19, 1997.

    By the Commission.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29749 Filed 11-6-97; 12:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.22

AMENDMENT



to



GROUP DISABILITY INCOME REINSURANCE AGREEMENT

(Agreement)



between



STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY

Portland, Oregon

(Standard)



and



THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

(Northwestern Mutual)



Effective
January 1, 2005, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions, and agreements between the parties, Northwestern Mutual and Standard agree as follows:



1. The attached Exhibit B (Effective January 1, 2005) shall replace the existing Exhibit B in its entirety.



2.     (a) As detailed in subsection (b) below, any
calculations involving Exhibit B performed for services rendered on or after January 1, 2005 shall be recalculated using the attached Exhibit B. The entire financial impact of the retroactive application of formula in the attached Exhibit B will be
reflected in the April, 2005 financial settlements between the parties.



(b) With the exception of Commission Expense and Acquisition Expense, all elements of the formula in the attached Exhibit B will be implemented as if they had been in use as of January 1, 2005. Commission Expense will
be implemented as if it had been in use from the last policy anniversary for each policy. Acquisition Expense will be implemented as if it had been in use as of April 1, 2005.



This Amendment is executed in duplicate by the duly authorized agents of NML and Reinsurer. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement
not specifically and expressly modified by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.



|                           |  |                                        |  |                                                |  |     |  |                                     
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY |  |                                        |  | THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
|                           |  |                                        |  |                                               
|By:                        |  | /s/ DAVID G. FITZPATRICK               |  |                                                |  | By: |  | /s/ WILLIAM C. KOENIG               
|                           |  | David G. Fitzpatrick                   |  |                                                |  |     |  | William C. Koenig                   
|                           |  | Vice President and Group Actuary       |  |                                                |  |     |  | Sr. Vice President and Chief Actuary
|                           |  | Employee Benefits  Insurance Division |  |                                                |  |     |  |                                     



Note: Exhibit B (Effective January 1,
2005) is excluded from this filing. A supplemental copy of this exhibit will be furnished to the Commission upon request.
From: John Mietus

To: Finamore, Robert (OST); Hedberg, Brian (OST); Kruger, Brett (OST)

Subject: RE: POLL: Aeromexico, Docket OST-2013-0029

Date: Thursday, February 14, 2013 3:32:57 PM

Attachments: AM 3 routes application filed 20130207.pdf

Gentlemen:  I have completed the poll of U.S. carriers, and there are no objections to this

application.

Best regards, John

From: John Mietus 

Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:27 PM

To: 'sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com'; 'robert.wirick@aa.com'; 'francis.heil@aa.com';

'lhalloway@crowell.com'; 'gmurphy@crowell.com'; 'dan.weiss@united.com'; 'jonathan.linde@united.com';

'steve.morrissey@united.com'; 'howard.kass@usairways.com'; 'benjamin.slocum@usairways.com';

'nssparks@fedex.com'; 'gbleopard@fedex.com'; 'jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com';

'jcanny@amerijet.com'; 'anita.mosner@hklaw.com'; 'Jennifer.novak@hklaw.com'; 'jhill@dowlohnes.com';

'robert.land@jetblue.com'; 'john.fredericksen@suncountry.com'; 'pmurphy@ggh-airlaw.com';

'stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com'; 'bob.kneisley@wnco.com'; 'leslie.abbott@wnco.com';

'robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com'; 'patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com'; 'jyoung@yklaw.com';

'dkirstein@yklaw.com'; 'msinick@ssd.com'; 'agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com'; 'urskr@state.gov';

'john.allen@faa.gov'

Cc: 'Robert.Finamore@dot.gov'; 'Brian.Hedberg@dot.gov'; 'info@airlineinfo.com'

Subject: POLL: Aeromexico application (3 Mexico-Los Angeles markets)

Dear all, attached please find Aeromexico’s application for scheduled exemption authority in

three Mexico-Los Angeles markets. A response with your carrier's position on the

application will be greatly appreciated.

Best regards, John

POLL LIST:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

robert.wirick, francis.heil@aa.com

lhalloway, gmurphy@crowell.com for United

dan.weiss, jonathan.linde, steve.morrissey@united.com

howard.kass, benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

nssparks, gbleopard@fedex.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com + jcanny@amerijet.com

anita.mosner, Jennifer.novak@hklaw.com for UPS

jhill@dowlohnes.com; robert.land@jetblue.com

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

pmurphy@ggh-airlaw.com for USA 3000

stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com for Astar

bob.kneisley, leslie.abbott@wnco.com for Southwest and AirTran

robert.cohn, patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com for Frontier

jyoung, dkirstein@yklaw.com for Spirit

msinick@ssd.com for Alaska

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com for Ryan Int'l

urskr@state.gov

john.allen@faa.gov
_________________________

John Mietus

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC

6701 Democracy Blvd Ste 300

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500

(202) 747-5212

(240) 396-5362 fax

john@mietuslaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this e-mail and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise

protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not review, use, disclose, distribute or copy the information

it contains; destroy this e-mail and notify the sender by reply e-mail or an e-mail to admin@mietuslaw.com. Thanks.