alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.4
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 14, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Charles N. EldredCharles N. EldredExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Public Service Company of New Mexico
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 23, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50915

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIME ROBLEDO-ARECHAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-1197-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jaime Robledo-Arechar appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He

contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). Robledo-Arechar complains that his sentence was

improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He argues

that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. 
No. 02-50915

-2-

Alternatively, Robledo-Arechar contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that

the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was

an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that

should have been alleged in his indictment.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Robledo-Arechar acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
DENY and Opinion Filed May 6, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-01305-CV IN RE ROBERT WOLF AND AYA HEALTHCARE, INC., Relators Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-23-19865 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Nowell In this original proceeding, relators Robert Wolf and Aya Healthcare, Inc., seek a writ of mandamus compelling the tr ial court to (1) refrain from enforcing “Category (b)” of the Novemb er 14, 2023 order and (2) require real parties in interest to respond to certain interrogatories and produce the documents and witnesses requested in relators’ moti on for expedited discovery. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires re lators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that th ey lack an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co

. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).–2– After reviewing the petition, real parties in interest’s response, the reply, and the record before us, we conclude that re lators have failed to demonstrate entitlement to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a). We also lift the stay i ssued by our January 3, 2024 order.

231305F.P05 /Erin A. Nowell / ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29752]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 25, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Objectives.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-29752 Filed 11-6-97; 12:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
DRAFT AGENDA

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) 

FIFRA SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL (SAP) 

OPEN MEETING 

December 2-4, 2014

FIFRA SAP WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/ 

DOCKET NUMBER: EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0614

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

CONFERENCE CENTER LOBBY LEVEL

ONE POTOMAC YARD (SOUTH BLDG.)

2777 S. CRYSTAL DRIVE, ARLINGTON, VA 22202

Scientific Issues Associated with Integrated Endocrine Bioactivity and Exposure-Based 

Prioritization and Screening 

Please note that all times are approximate (see note at the end of the Agenda).

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Fred Jenkins, Ph.D.,

Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 P.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members – James McManaman, Ph.D., 

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Welcome and Opening Remarks – David Dix, Ph.D., Director, Office of Science 

Coordination and Policy (OSCP), EPA

9:20 A.M. US EPA Presentations

10:30 A.M. Break

10:45 A.M. US EPA Presentations (Cont’d)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:15 P.M. US EPA Presentations (Cont’d)

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

Day 1

Tuesday, December 2, 2014
9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Fred Jenkins, Ph.D.,

Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members – James McManaman, Ph.D.,

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day presentations

9:40 A.M. Public Comments

10:30 A.M Break

10:40 A.M. Public Comments (Cont’d)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:15 P.M. Public Comments (Cont’d)

3:30 P.M. Break

3:45 P.M. Charge to Panel

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

Day 2

Wednesday December 3, 2014
9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Fred Jenkins, Ph.D.

Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members – James McManaman, Ph.D.,

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day discussions

9:30 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont’d)

10:30 A.M. Break

10:45 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont’d)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:15 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont’d)

2:45 P.M. Break

3:00 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont’d)

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

Note: Please be advised that agenda times are approximate; when the discussion for one 

topic is completed, discussions for the next topic will begin. For further information, please 

contact the Designated Federal Official for this meeting, Dr. Fred Jenkins, via telephone: 

(202) 564-3327; fax: (202) 564-8382; or email: jenkins.fred@epa.gov.

Day 3

Thursday December 4, 2014
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,565-01

EX P ARTE TRAVIS TE RRIMA INE SIMMONS, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2-14-449-AIN THE 382 DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM ROCK

WALL COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenc ed to eig hteen y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary beca use counsel informed him to not worry about the g un char g e and that he would be home in three to four y ear s. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court i s the2

appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffe ctive assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I t appea rs that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter

mine if Applicant is repr esente d by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr es en t ed by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law in r eg ard to A pplicant’s claim that his plea was involuntary due to counsel’s defic ient advice

. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t an d co n cl u s ions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applica

nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved wi t h i n 9 0 d ay s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of time must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.

Filed: Nove mber 20, 2019 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThinkEngine Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
G. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                      /s/ Michael G. Mitchell
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      Michael G. Mitchell
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      August 9, 2007
~I CC17 -oz_ 

RECEIVED IN 

• 

r.r" lOT 01= CRIMINAL fat'PEAI.~
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10393 

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARY DEON MCGOWAN,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:89cr00203

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cary Deon McGowan appeals from the district court's denial

of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2). The district court did not err by concluding that

U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, comment. (n.1), amendment 484, was not

applicable and by not conducting an evidentiary hearing on the

matter. See United States v. Allison, 63 F.3d 350, 353 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 405 (1995). 

AFFIRMED.
#### David M. DUNCAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44208.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 8, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 279 So.2d 402.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
No. 00-7096.

#### James *v.*Gibson, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1798 

To provide for emergency grants for essential community facilities and temporary installations needed in response to COVID–19 pandemic in rural 

areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. BOST (for himself, Mrs. LURIA, and Mr. HAGEDORN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for emergency grants for essential community 

facilities and temporary installations needed in response 

to COVID–19 pandemic in rural areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Rural 

5 Community Relief Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1798 IH

1 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY GRANTS FOR ESSENTIAL COMMUNITY 

2 FACILITIES AND TEMPORARY INSTALLA3 TIONS NEEDED IN RESPONSE TO COVID–19 

4 PANDEMIC. 

5 Section 306(a)(19) of the Consolidated Farm and 

6 Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1926(a)(19)) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘this para9 graph’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘sub10 paragraph (A)’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(C) EMERGENCY GRANTS.— 

13 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary 

14 may make grants during an emergency, as 

15 determined by the Secretary, to any entity 

16 referred to in subparagraph (A) to pur17 chase vehicles, equipment, or services need18 ed for the immediate safe operation of an 

19 essential community facility or a tem20 porary installation necessary to support 

21 the public response to the emergency in a 

22 rural area. 

23 ‘‘(ii) USE OF GRANT.—The Secretary 

24 shall, by regulation, determine— 

25 ‘‘(I) the kinds of vehicles, equip26 ment, and supplies which may be purVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:51 May 03, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1798.IH H1798

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1798 IH

1 chased using a grant made under this 

2 subparagraph; and 

3 ‘‘(II) the kinds of facilities and 

4 temporary installations for which such 

5 a purchase may be made. 

6 ‘‘(iii) APPROPRIATION.— 

7 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—Out of any 

8 money in the Treasury of the United 

9 States not otherwise appropriated, 

10 there are appropriated to the Sec11 retary $100,000,000 to carry out this 

12 subparagraph. 

13 ‘‘(II) AVAILABILITY.—The 

14 amount made available by clause (i) 

15 shall remain available through Decem16 ber 31, 2022.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# L_2006010EN.01007201.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/72

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1811/2005 of 4 November 2005 concerning the provisional and permanent authorisations of certain additives in feedingstuffs and the provisional authorisation of a new use of an additive already authorised in feedingstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 291 of 5 November 2005
  )

On page 15, in Annex II, in the table, line 63, third column ‘Chemical formula, description’, third paragraph ‘Liquid form’:

for:

‘Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase:

120 000 BXU/ml

Endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase:

30 000 BU/ml’,

read:

‘Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase:

120 000 BXU/g

Endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase:

30 000 BU/g’.

---
#### MINI-TOGS, INC. et al. v. Fred E. YOUNG.

No. 61920.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Mini-Togs, Inc., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Ouachi-ta.

Writ denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of DWS Institutional Funds on Form N-1A ("Registration Statement") of
our report dated November 28, 2007 relating to the financial statements and
financial highlights which appears in the September 30, 2007 Annual Report to
Shareholders of DWS Inflation Protected Plus Fund, which is also incorporated by
reference into the Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to
us under the headings "Financial Highlights", "Financial Statements" and
"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such Registration Statement.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 28, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 The undersigned, Garrett Sullivan, the Chief Financial Officer of
Cognitronics Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Company.


DATED this 11th day of November 2004.

/s/ Garrett Sullivan
-------------------
Garrett Sullivan

Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the period ended
April 2, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Varian,
Inc.



Dated: May 17, 2004



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ GARRY W. ROGERSON                                  
|                                                       
|Garry W. Rogerson President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Varian, Inc. and will be retained by Varian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2005342EN.01004701.xml

| 24.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/47

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2154/2005

of 23 December 2005

supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 as regards the entry of a name in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’
  (‘Sidra de Asturias’
  or
  ‘Sidra d’Asturies’) [PDO]

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 6(3) and (4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, the request from Spain to enter the name ‘Sidra de Asturias’ or ‘Sidra d’Asturies’ has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, the request from Spain to enter the name ‘Sidra de Asturias’ or ‘Sidra d’Asturies’ has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | Since the Commission has received no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, this name must be entered in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since the Commission has received no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, this name must be entered in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby added to the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 December 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 98, 22.4.2005, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 327, 18.12.1996, p. 11.

3

---

ANNEX

Products listed in Annex I to the Treaty, intended for human consumption

Other Annex I products (spices, etc.)

SPAIN

‘Sidra de Asturias’ or ‘Sidra d’Asturies’ (PDO)

---