Redland Brick 

July 14, 2004 

The purpose of this test program is to quantify the emissions from the exhaust of 

the limestone absorber that controls emissions from the natural gas fired brick 

kiln. Testing was for hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride and sulfur dioxide. 

The test results indicate that emissions of hydrogen fluoride exceeded the 

allowable emission limit. Sulfur dioxide and hydrogen chloride are below the 

allowable emission limit. 

The attached tables present the test results and operating conditions during the 

test program. 
Method/Component 

Method 2 Flowrate 

Table 3-2 

Summary of Results 

Redland Brick, Inc. 

KF Brick Plant 

South Windsor, CT 

14 July 2004 

Units 

dscfrn 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

18426 18122 17969 18198 

Method 8 

Sulfur Dioxide 

Method 26 

HC1 

HF 

%C02 

pounds per hour 

pounds per hour 

pounds per hour 

18.5 

1.5 

6.68 

2.08 

4.69 

18:•t 18.5 18.5 

1.6 1.5 1.6 

7.91 

2.39 

5.28 

7.93 

2.20 

5.11 

dscfm dry standard cubic feet per minute (68°F and 29.92 inches Hg) 

7.31 

2.22 

5.03 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 4 6am/•ir.¢om 
3.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSION OF RESULTS 

3.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 

The purpose of this test program was to quantify air emissions from the KF brick 

manufacturing plant while firing natural gas and to compare these emissions data to 

applicable emission limits as provided for in the CTDEP air permit. Emission testing was 

conducted in accordance with the EPA approved test procedures. Three emissions tests were 

conducted for each parameter, with the average result of the three tests used to determine 

compliance. Table 3-1 lists the emission limits from the parameters measured, the EPA 

reference methods used, and the sampling times for each test. 

Parameter EPA 

Natural Gas Test Methods 

Sulfur Dioxide Method 8 

Method 26 

Method 26 

Method 3 

lbs/hr pounds per hour 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Oxygen/ 

Carbon Dioxide 

Table 3-1 

Air Emissions Test Program 

Redland Brick, Inc. 

KF Plant 

South Windsor, Connecticut 

Sample 

Times 

(min.) 

Emission 

Limits 

Analytical 

Laboratory 

Number of 

Runs 

60 13.2 lbs/hr PSC 3 + 1 blank 

60 2.35 lbs/hr PSC 3 + 1 blank 

60 2.85 lbs/hr PSC 3 + 1 blank 

60 NA GamAir 3 

3.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 

There were no changes to the original test protocol, testing proceeded without incident. 

3.3 Summary of Test Results 

Results from this compliance t6st program are summarized in Table 3-2 and detailed in 

Appendix B. The sulfur dioxide emissions, (expressed as SO2), averaged 7.3 pounds per hour 

(lbs/hr) which are 55.3 percent of the permit limit and are in compliance with the CTDEP 

regulations. Hydtogen chloride (HC1) tests averaged 2.22 pounds per hour, are 94.5 percent 

of the permit limit, and also are in compliance with CTDEP regulations. The hydrogen 

fluoride (HF) runs averaged 5.03 pounds per hour which exceed the permit limit of 2.85 

pounds per hour. 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 3 6am/•,ir.¢om 
EMISSION TEST RESULTS Audited by:Carl S. Ekroth 

TEST NO. 2 3 

LOCATION Absorber Absorber Absorber 

FIRM Redland Brick Redland Brick Redland Brick 

TIM E 1205-1308 1330-1435 1452-1555 

DATE 38182 38182 38182 

ITT NO. 204027 204027 204027 

COMPOUND H2SO4 H2SO4 H2SO4 

ALLOWABLE LEAK RATE CFM 0.020 0.020 0.020 

CORRECT FOR EXCESSIVE LEAK NO NO NO 

S,•,.MPLE VOLUME CUB!C FEET 45.60! 47.99! 47.773 

ISOKINETIC RATIO PERCENT 91.7 96.8 96.5 

ENGLISH UNITS 

SAMPLE VOLUME, DRY 

MOISTURE 

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GA• 

EXCESS AIR 

Average 

STACK VELOCITY 

VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE, ACTUAL 

VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE,DRY STD 

CONCENTRATION, ACTUAL 

CONCENTRATION, DRY, STD 

CONCENTRATION 

DSCF 43.77 45.43 44.93 44.71 

PERCENT 6.9 6.6 7.4 7.0 

Ib/Ib-mole 28.22 28.27 28.17 28.22 

PERCENT 706.1 676.5 706.1 696.2 

CONC. @ 12% CO2 

CONC. @ 12% CO2 

CONC. @ 12% CO2 (FROM PPM) 

FPM 2620 2600 2630 2617 

ACFM 31500 31300 31700 31500 

DSCFM 18384 18089 17968 18147 

CONC. @ 7% 02 

CONC. @ 7% 02 

CONC. @ 7% 02 (FROM PPM) 

CONC. @ 50% EA 

CONC. GAS WEIGHT @ 50% EA 

grains/acf 2.47E-02 2.94E-02 2.92E-02 2.78E-02 

grains/DSCF 4.231E-02 5.095 E-02 5.152E-02 4.83E-02 

Ib/DSCF 6.05E-06 7.28E-06 7.36E-06 6.90E-06 

gr/DSCF 3.38E-01 3.82E-01 4.12E-01 

ppmdv #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 

ppmdv 0 0 0 

F-FACTOR 

gr/DSCF 0.2450 0.2833 0.2984 

ppmdv #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 

ppmdv 0 0 0. 

EMISSION RATE 

EMISSION RATE (FROM PPM) 

gr/DSCF 0.2274 0.2638 0.2769 

Ib/1000 Ib 0.4308 0.4996 0.5246 

EMISSIONS 

EMISSIONS (FROM PPM) 

DSCF/MMBTU 9199 9199 9199 

Ib/hr 6.67E+00 7.90E+00 7.94E+00 

Ib/hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Ib/MMBTU 4.843E-01 5.599E-01 5.897E-01 

Ib/MMBTU 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 

7.50E+00 

CONC. @ 7%02 mg/dscm 560.72 648.30 682.82 
EMISSION TEST DATA Audited by:Carl S. Ekroth 

TEST NO. 2 3 

LOCATION Absorber Absorber Absorber 

FIRM Redland Brick Redland Brick Redland Brick 

TI ME 1205-1308 1330-1435 1452-1555 

DATE 07/14/04 07/14/04 07/14/04 

ITT NO. 204027 204027 204027 

COMPOUND H2SO4 H2SO4 H2SO4 Average 

EMISSION LIMIT Ib/hr 13.2 13.2 13.2 

FINAL LEAK RATE CFM 0.007 0 0 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE in. HG 29.79 29.8 29.8 29.80 

STACK AREA SQUARE FI=FT !_•04 !2_04 !2.04 

NOZZLE DIAMETER INCHES 0,309 0.309 0.309 

SAMPLING TIME MINUTES 60 60 60 

DRY GAS METER CAL FACTOR [Y] 0.991 0,991 0,991 

PITOT COEFFICIENT 0,84 0,84 0,84 

AVG SQUARE ROOT OF DELTA P INCHES H20 0.609 0,6018 0,604 0,60 

AVG DELTA H INCHES H20 1.86 2,07 2,065 2,00 

AVG METER TEMP DEGREES F 85.3 93,4 97 91,90 

STATIC PRESSURE INCHES H20 0,31 0,31 0.3 0.31 

AVG STACK TEMP DEGREES F 379,2 390,7 400 389,97 

SAMPLE VOLUME CUBIC FEET 45.601 47,991 47,773 47.12 

VOL. OF LIGUID IMPINGERS MILLITERS 69 68 76 71,00 

VOL, OF LIGUID SILICA GEL GRAMS #DIV/0! 

***STACK GAS ANALYSIS*** 

CO2 PERCENT 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.53 

02 PERCENT 18.5 18.4 18.5 18.47 

CO PERCENT 

N2 PERCENT 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.00 

FUEL FACTOR Fo 

SAMPLE ANALYSIS*** 

TOTAL CATCH 

CONCENTRATION OF COMPOUND 

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF COMPOUN[ 

MILIGRAMS 

PPM 

g/g-MOLE 

120 150 150 140.00 

FUEL ANALYSIS*** 

TYPE OF FUEL 

F-FACTOR 

PERCENT HYDROGEN IN FUEL 

PERCENT CARBON IN FUEL 

PERCENT SULFUR IN FUEL 

PERCENT NITROGEN IN FUEL 

PERCENT OXYGEN IN FUEL 

GROSS CALORIC VALUE OF FUEL 

DSCF/MMBTU 

%H 13.35 13.35 13.35 

%C 86.65 86.65 86.65 

%S 0.0062 0.0062 0.0062 

%N 0.1 0.1 0.1 

%0 0.1 0.1 0.1 

BTU/LB 19692 19692 19692 
Gammie Air 

Monitoring, LLC 

28 Canton Road 

West Simsbury, CT 

860-658-4929 

06092 

Fax 860-658-2223 

20 August 2004 

Mr. Mark Algier 

State of Connecticut 

Department of Environmental Protection 

Bureau of Air Management/E&E 

79 Elm •*-oo* 

RECEIVED 

Hartford, CT 06106-5127 

Re: Redland Brick, Inc. KF Plant 

Air Emissions Test Report 

GamAir Project No.: 547-0401 

Dear Mr. Algier: 

Please find enclosed a copy of the, "Compliance Test Report, Redland Brick, Inc., KF Plant, 

South Windsor, Connecticut", dated August 2004. This copy can be placed in the three ring 

notebook previously sent with the test protocol. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 

Thank you, 

Gammie Air Monitoring, LLC 

Leigh A. Gammie 

Program Manager 

cc. Mr. S. Gog!ick, KF 

Mr. B. Miller, Redland 

cmd: 547-0401 KF Plant report 
STATE OF CONNECTICUT 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

September 13, 2004 

Leigh A. Gammie 

Program Manager 

Gammie Air Monitoring, LLC. 

28 Canton Road 

West Simsbury, Connecticut 06092 

Dear Mr. Gammie, 

Re: GamAir Project no.: 547-0401 

The test report for sampling emissions from a tunnel kiln/oxidizer that is owned and operated by Redland Brick, Inc. and located in South Windsor, Connecticut, has been reviewed. The 

emission values specified are considered to be representative of the actual emissions. 

The results have been forwarded to our Compliance Analysis Division. Final approval of the test 

report is dependent upon their review and approval of operating parameters incurred during the 

test program. Redland Brick will be notified if further regulatory action is to be taken. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Carl S. Ekroth at (860) 424-3894. 

Acting Director 

cc: Mr. Stan Goglick, Redland Brick, Inc. 

Steve Anderson, Compliance Analysis 

• File #204027 

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 

79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106- 5127 

An Equal Opportunity Employer 
• esinctudin cover•e•t 

CC: comment Ptease 

[• Urgent [• For your review •] l•eply AE.,A'P I..J 

REMARKS: 
Compliance Test Report 

D,•rll=nri Rriri•_ T_n_¢. 

KF Plant 

South Windsor, Connecticut 

Prepared for: 

Mr. Stan Goglick 

Redland Brick, Inc. 

Prepared by: 

Mr. Leigh A. Gammie 

Gammie Air Monitoring, LLC 

August 2004 

GamAir Project No.: 547-0401 
Table of Contents 

Section 

1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 

1.1 Summary of Test Program ........................................................................................................... 

1.2 Key Personnel ................................................................................................................................ 

2.0 SOURCE AND SAMLING LOCATION DESCRIPTION 2 

2.1 Process Description ....................................................................................................................... 2 

2.2 Flue Gas Sampling Locations ....................................................................................................... 

9_ 

3.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSION OF RESULTS -• 3 

3.2 Field Test Changes and Problems ................................................................................................ 3 

33 Summary of Test Results ............................................................................................................... 3 

4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY 5 

4.1 Volumetric Flow Rate Tests ......................................................................................................... 5 

4• Sulfur Dioxide Outlet Tests ............................................................................................................ 6 

4.3 Hydrogen Chloride/Hydrogen Fluoride Outlet Tests 6 

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 8 

5.1 

5.1.1 

5.1.2 

5.1.3 

5.2 

5.3 

QC Procedures .............................................................................................................................. 8 

Equipment Calibrations 8 

Analytical Quality Control Procedures 8 

Calculations Quality Control Procedures 8 

QA Audits ...................................................................................................................................... 9 

QA/QC Checks of Data Reduction 9 

Appendix A Figures and Diagrams 

Appendix B Results and Calculations 

Appendix C Field Data Sheets 

Appendix D Process Monitoring Data 

Appendix E Laboratory Analytical Data 

Appendix F Equipment Calibrations 

547-0401 Redland Brick report GamAir.com 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 

1.1 Summary of Test Program 

Gammie Air Monitoring, LLC (GamAir) was retained by Redland Brick, Inc. to perform a 

compliance air emissions testing program on the brick kiln exhaust stack at the KF Plant 

located in South Windsor, Connecticut. Testing occurred on the exhaust of the limestone 

absorber control device while firing natural gas. The purpose of this test program was to 

quantify the controlled emissions from the brick kiln at the KF facility. This source was 

identified by the CTDEP as Town No. 169, Premise No. 005, Permit No. 0032, and Stack No. 

20. The emission limits were as follows. 

Hydrogen Fluoride less than 2.35 pounds per hour 

Sulfur Dioxide (expressed as SO2) less than 13.2 pounds per hour 

Controlled air emissions of hydrogen chloride (HC1), hydrogen fluoride, (HF), and sulfur 

dioxide (SO2), carbon dioxide (CO2), and oxygen (02) were measured at the absorber outlet 

stack. 

The air emission tests were carried out in conformance with the CTDEP guidelines for source 

emission testing and applicable test methodologies as published in Title 40, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 60, Appendix A (40CFR60). This test program was conducted during a 

single field effort. GamAir was responsible for sampling and analyzing all air emissions. KF 

personnel were responsible for operating the brick manufacturing line at normal load 

conditions and collecting all process data. 

1.2 Key Personnel 

The following is a list of key individuals who were responsible for the organization of this test 

program. 

Mr. Barry Miller 

Mr. Stan Goglick 

Mr. Rick Pirolli 

Mr. Carl Ekroth 

Ms. Ancy Sebastian 

Mr. Jim Kenny 

Mr. Leigh Gammie 

Redland Brick, Inc. 

KF Plant 

CTDEP 

CTDEP 

PSC Analytical Services, Inc. 

EHL 

GamAir 

(301) 223-7700 

(860) 528-1311 

(860) 424-4152 

(860) 424-3894 

(905) 332-8788 

(860) 635-6475 

(860) 658-4929 

547-0401 Redland Brick report GamAir.com 
2.0 SOURCE AND SAMLING LOCATION DESCRIPTION 

2.1 Process Description 

Redland Brick Inc., KF Plant (KF) operates a brick manufacturing process which utilizes a 

natural gas-fired tunnel kiln to dry and fire the bricks. The kiln is permitted to process 21.6 

tons per hour of unfired bricks, (green weight). The maximum fuel-firing rate was 

25MMBtu/hr (25,000 cubic feet/hour). The maximum kiln temperature was 2100 degrees 

Fahrenheit (°F). Unfired bricks vary in weight from four to 6.2 pounds each. The maximum 

daily push rate through the kiln is fifteen (15) cars. For this test program the push rate was 

7.5 cars per day which equates to 11.7 green tons per hour. 

Emissions generated from the tunnel kiln were controlled by a BACT Engineering, 

Inc./Hellmich GmbH & Co. dry cascade absorber. The absorber pressure drop operated at a 

range between 2.5 to 3.0 inches of water column. 

2.2 Flue Gas Sampling Locations 

Outlet flue gas sampling occurred after the dry absorber in a vertical steel stack with an inside 

diameter (i.d.) of 47 inches. Two test ports were located 90 degrees apart. The sample ports 

were 8.9 duct diameters (420 inches) downstream and 6.4 duct diameters (300 inches) 

upstream to their respective flow disturbances. In accordance with EPA Method 1, twelve 

traverse points (6 per port) were used for isokinetic sampling. The individual traverse point 

locations and stack schematic are shown in Appendix A. 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 2 GamAir.com 
3.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSION OF RESULTS 

3.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 

The purpose of this test program was to quantify air emissions from the KF brick 

manufacturing plant while firing natural gas and to compare these emissions data to 

applicable emission limits as provided for in the CTDEP air permit. Emission testing was 

conducted in accordance with the EPA approved test procedures. Three emissions tests were 

conducted for each parameter, with the average result of the three tests used to determine 

compliance. Table 3-1 lists the emission limits from the parameters measured, the EPA 

reference methods used, and the sampling times for each test. 

Parameter 

Natural Gas 

EPA 

Test Methods 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Oxygen/ 

Carbon Dioxide 

lbs/hr pounds per hour 

Table 3-1 

Air Emissions Test Program 

Redland Brick, Inc. 

KF Plant 

South Windsorr Connecticut 

Sample 

Times 

(min.) 

60 

Emission 

Limits 

Analytical 

Laboratory 

Number of 

Runs 

Sulfur Dioxide Method 8 13.2 lbs/hr PSC 3 + 1 blank 

Method 26 60 2.35 lbs/hr PSC 3 + 1 blank 

Method 26 60 2.85 lbs/hr PSC 3 + 1 blank 

Method NA GamAir 3 3 60 

3.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 

There were no changes to the original test protocol, testing proceeded without incident. 

3.3 Summary of Test Results 

Results from this compliance t•st program are summarized in Table 3-2 and detailed in 

Appendix B. The sulfur dioxide emissions, (expressed as SO2), averaged 7.3 pounds per hour 

(lbs/hr) which are 55.3 percent of the permit limit and are in compliance with the CTDEP 

regulations. Hydrogen chloride (HC1) tests averaged 2.22 pounds per hour, are 9.4..___5•grcent 

of the permit limit, and also are in compliance with CTDEP regulations. The hydrogen 

fluoride (HF) runs averaged 5.03 pounds per hour which exceed the permit limit of 2.85 •, 

pounds per hour. 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 3 6am/•ir.¢ora 
Method/Component 

Method 2 Flowrate 

Method 3A O_9/CO• 

Method 8 

Sulfur Dioxide 

Method 26 

HC1 

HF 

Table 3-2 

Summary of Results 

Redland Brick, Inc. 

KF Brick Plant 

South Windsor, CT 

14 July 2004 

Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

dscfrn 18426 18122 17969 18198 

% O2 18.5 18.4 18.5 18.5 

%CO:• 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 

pounds per hour 6.68 7.91 7.93 7.31 

pounds per hour 2.08 2.39 2.20 2.22 

pounds per hour 4.69 5.28 5.11 5.03 

dscfm dry standard cubic feet per minute (68°F and 29.92 inches Hg) 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 4 GamAir.¢om 
4.0 SAMPIJNG AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY 

The following EPA test methods were utilized during this emissions test program: 

EPA Method 1 

EPA Method 2 

EPA Method 3 

EPA Method 4 

EPA Met_hod 8 

EPA Method 26 

Sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources 

Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (type S 

Pitot tube) 

Determination of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in 

emissions from stationary sources (Orsat analyzer procedure) 

Determination of moisture content in stack gases 

Determination of sulfur dioxide emissions from stationary sources 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from 

Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method 

The following sections describe the sampling and analytical procedures utilized during the 

emissions testing. All tests were performed in triplicate. All sampling and analytical 

procedure followed those outlined in 40CFR60, Appendix A. 

4.1 Volumetric Flow Rate Tests 

The volumetric flowrate of the flue gas at the stack test location was determined using EPA 

Methods 1-4. In accordance with EPA Method 1 traverse points were utilized for flue gas 

velocity measurements and isokinetic sampling. The locations of the traverse points, as 

determined by EPA Method 1, are listed in Appendix A. Flue gas velocity measurements 

were taken at each traverse point during each test run using an S-type Pitot tube and an 

inclined water manometer in accordance with EPA Method 2. Stack temperature 

measurements were taken at each traverse point using a Type-K thermocouple and digital 

temperature readout. The stack static pressure was also measured during each test run using 

the Pitot tube and manometer setup. Pitot tube leak checks were performed before and after 

each test run in accordance with EPA Method 2. 

The dry molecular weight of the outlet flue gases was determined by measuring the oxygen 

(02) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations using the integrated bag sampling method 

followed by analysis with an Orsat analyzer. An integrated 15 liter Tedlar bag was collected 

simultaneously with the EPA Method 8 sampling train. Carbon dioxide and oxygen 

concentrations were determined from integrated gaseous samples collected during each test 

run using the sample train described in EPA Method 3. The flue gas moisture content was 

determined from the back half moisture catches of the isokinetic sampling train during the 

emissions testing in accordance with EPA Method 4. The moisture content of the flue gas 

was calculated as the ratio of the moisture catch corrected to standard conditions to the sum of 

the dry sample, volume and the moisture catch, both corrected to standard conditions. 

Calculated moisture contents, which exceed the saturation moisture at the average duct 

temperature, would be defaulted to the saturation moisture. 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 5 ¢;amAir.com 
4.2 Sulfur Dioxide Outlet Tests 

Triplicate isokinetic sulfur dioxide tests were performed on the absorber outlet exhaust stack. 

Each test was 60 minutes in duration and was conducted in accordance with EPA Method 8. 

The EPA Method 8 sampling train is depicted in Appendix A. The sampling train was similar 

to the Method 5 train with the exception of 1) a glass wool filter was placed between the first 

and second impinger 2) the heated filter between the probe and impingers was removed, and 

3) the impinger contents were replaced with isopropanol (IPA) and hydrogen peroxide. The 

sample train probe and heater box were heated to 248°F +/-25°F degrees to prevent moisture 

condensation. The first impinger contained 100ml of 80% isopropanol, 100 ml of 3% 

hydrogen peroxide was contained in both the second and third impinger, while 250 grams of 

_:,: 1.•A •., •,• • •h •mn•n,,•r t• l•n,•,qc ,•Ut •nv remaining moisture before 

reaching the sampling pump. The impinger outlet temperature was maintained below 68°F 

during sampling. 

Before and after each test run the sampling train was leak checked to ensure no leakage 

greater than 0.2 cubic feet per minute. The sampling train operating parameters was recorded 

at each traverse point on preprinted data sheets as shown in Appendix C. 

After the post test leak check, the sampling train was inspected and then moved to the clean 

up area. A fifteen (15) purge of clean ambient air was then run at the average flow rate used 

during the test. Upon completion, the sampling train was recovered as follows: 

Container No. 1 Weighed the first impinger contents to the nearest 0.5 gram and 

recorded its weight. Rinsed the nozzle, probe, filter housing, first impinger, and 

connecting glassware with IPA. Placed the glass wool filter in with the IPA rinses, 

sealed container, and marked level of liquid. 

Container No. 2 Weighed second and third impingers for moisture gain to the 

nearest 0.5 grams. Transfer solutions from second and third impingers to a 1000ml 

graduated cylinder. All connecting glassware from the second impinger to the third 

impinger are then rinsed twice with distilled water. Dilute to a volume of 1000 ml 

with DI water, mark liquid level and label container. 

Container No. 3 Weighed contents of silica gel impinger to nearest 0.5 grams 

and add figure to total moisture gain, then discard. 

Container No. 1 did not get analyzed as sulfuric acid was not a requirement for this test 

program. Container No. 2 was then shipped to a contract laboratory for sulfur dioxide 

analysis. Sulfur dioxide analysis from container No. 2 consisted of using a titration method 

with 2 to 4 drops of thorin indicator, titrating to a pink endpoint using 0.010 N barium 

perchlorate. This analysis was duplicated per the method. A field blank was also provided to 

the laboratory for analysis. 

4.3 Hydrogen Chloride/Hydrogen Fluoride Outlet Tests 

Triplicate hydrogen chloride (HC1) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) tests were performed at the 

absorber outlet stack simulfaneously with the EPA Method 8 testing. Each test was 60 

minutes in duration and was conducted in accordance with EPA Method 26. 

The HC1/HF sampling train consisted of a flexible heated Teflon transfer line with an in-stack 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 6 
Teflon filter, a set of 5 glass mini impingers connected in series contained in an ice bath, a 

leakless vacuum pump, a calibrated rotometer, and a calibrated dry gas meter. The sample 

probe was maintained at a temperature between 248°F and 275°F to prevent moisture 

condensation. A cyclone was not used with the GamAir sampling train. The first two 

impingers each contained 15 milliliters (ml) of 0.1N H2SO4 for the collection of HC1 and HF, 

the third and fourth impingers each contained 15 ml of 0.1N NaOH, and the fifth impinger 

contained a known quantity of silica gel. The impinger outlet temperature was maintained 

below 68°F during sampling. Sampling was performed at a constant rate of 2.0 liters per 

minute. 

Before and after each test run the sampling train was leak checked to ensure no leakage 

greater than 40 cubic centimeters per minute. The sampling train operating parameters were 

recorded at each traverse point on prepnnte•a •aata •cct• •t• •l•vw,• 1,, •r,r,,•,u,.• 

sampling train components were then moved to the clean up area. The following is a 

description of the sample recovery procedure. 

Container No. 1 emptied contents of impingers 1 & 2 and saved. Duplicate 

deionized water rinses of impingers 1 & 2. 

Container No. 2 

discarded. 

measured moisture contained in impinger 3, 4, and 5 then 

Container No. 3 

rinse water added. 

0.1 N H2SO4 reagent blank (30 ml) with corresponding 

Container No. 4 deionized water reagent blank. 

Sample containers 1, 3 and 4 were shipped to a contract laboratory for HC1 and HF analysis. 

Sample preparation and analysis consisted of properly preparing the ion chromatograph (IC). 

The IC conditions depended upon analytical column type and whether suppressed or 

nonsuppressed IC was used. The three individual samples (Containers 1, 3, & 4) were then 

analyzed separately. The reagent blanks (Containers 3 and 4) were also analyzed separately. 

The reagent blank consisted of those solutions used in the collection of HC1/HF, these blanks 

did not come in contact with any portion of the sampling trains as associated with a field train 

blank. 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 7 I•llla•,i r.¢Ol•! 
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 

5.1 QC Procedures 

Specific quality control (QC) procedures were followed to ensure the continuous production 

of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and 

procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and 

analytical scheme. Strict adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most 

applicable QC check. A discussion of both the sampling and analytical QC checks that were 

utilized during this program are presented below. 

5.1.1 Equipment Calibrations 

Prior to the start of the test program the CTDEP received copies of all sampling equipment 

calibrations as described in their stack testing guidelines. 

Emissions sampling equipment requiring calibration includes sampling nozzles, Pitot tubes, 

pressure gauges, thermometers, dry gas meters, and barometer. Post test calibration of the dry 

gas meters were all within their acceptable limit (Y 1.00 +/- 0.05). 

5.1.2 Analytical Quality Control Procedures 

All analyses for this program were performed using accepted laboratory procedures in 

accordance with the specified analytical protocols. Adherence to prescribed QC procedures 

for the EPA methods used for this test program ensured data of consistent and measurable 

quality. Analytical QC focused on the use of control standards to provide a measure of 

analytical precision and accuracy. The SO2 samples were analyzed following the procedures 

of EPA Method 8; HC1 and HF samples were analyzed in accordance with EPA Method 26. 

Field blanks and laboratory blanks were used to check for contamination. Also, specific 

acceptance criteria defined below for various analytical operations, including calibrations, 

control standard analyses, drift checks, blanks, etc. were within the acceptable limits of EPA 

Methods 8 and 26. 

Test Method and QC Sample 

EPA Method 8 

Duplicate Analysis 

Blanks 

Table 5-1 

Quality' Control Samples 

Criteria QC Limits Met 

Duplicate Analysis 

less than 1% or 0.2 ml 

At or below detection limit 

Yes 

Yes 

Sampling Isokinetics 90% to 110% Yes 

Blanks At or below detection limit Yes 

EPA Method 26 

percent difference less than Yes 

5% 

5.1.3 Calculations Quality Control Procedures 

Calculations for determining flow rates, moisture contents, isokinetics, particulate and 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 8 Gam/•ir.¢om 
gaseous concentrations were made using a computer program developed by GamAir. This 

program utilizes the calculation procedures and equations specified in EPA Methods 2, 4, and 

5. The program has been successfully used for numerous test efforts and has been validated 

by independent performance audits. Sample calculations were performed by the software 

program and a definition of terms is provided in the final report. Field data was transported to 

the software directly from the data sheets. All tests were performed within the acceptable 

isokinetic range of 90% to 110%. 

5.2 QA Audits 

There were no audits for this test program. 

5.3 QA/QC Checks of Data Reduction 

The project manage•: ran an independent check (using a validated computer program) of the 

calculations with predetermined data before the field test. This ensured that calculations done 

in the field were accurate. The project manager also conducted a spot check onsite to assure 

that data was recorded accurately. 

547-0401 Redland Brick report 9 GamAir.com 
Summary of Sulphur Dioxide Emissions 

KF Brick 

Exhaust Stack 

South Windsor, Connecticut 

RUN NUMBER: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

M8-1 

7/14/04 

1205-1308 

M8-2 

7/14/04 

1330-1425 

M8-3 

7114/04 

1452-1555 

Average 

REQUIRED INPUT DATA 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (" Hg) 

AREA OF STACK, (ft 2) 

NOZZLE DIAMETER, (inches) 

TOTAL SAMPLE TIME, (minutes) 

U•4• Y •,,,,•/c• M •1"•. 

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT 

AVERAGE VELOCITY PRESSURE (SQ. RT.), (" H20) 

AVG. ORIFICE PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL, (" H20) 

AVG. DRY GAS METER TEMPERATURE, (°F) 

STACK STATIC PRESS., (" 

AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, (°F) 

VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLED, 

TOTAL MOISTURE COLLECTED, (ml) 

CO2 IN STACK GAS, (%) 

O2 IN STACK GAS, (%) 

CO IN STACK GAS, (%) 

N= IN STACK GAS, (%) 

TOTAL SULPHUR DIOXIDE COLLECTED, (mg) 

29.79 29.80 29.80 29.80 

12.040 12.040 12.040 12.04 

0.309 0.309 0.309 0.309 

60 60 60 60.0 

09•1 0.991 0.991 0.99 

0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.6093 0.6018 0.6040 0.61 

1.860 2.060 2.060 1.96 

85 93 97 89.0 

0.31 0.31 0.30 0.31 

379 391 400 385.0 

45.601 47.991 47.773 46.796 

69.0 68.0 76.0 68.5 

1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 

18.5 18.4 18.5 18.5 

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 

120.0 150.0 150.0 135.0 

HYDROGEN IN FUEL, (%) 

CARBON IN FUEL, (%) 

SULFUR IN FUEL, (%) 

NITROGEN IN FUEL, (%) 

OXYGEN IN FUEL, (%) 

GCV, (Btu/Ib) 

CALCULATED DATA 

VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED, (dscf) 

MOISTURE IN STACK GAS, (%) 

STACK GAS WET MOLECULAR WEIGHT, (Ibllb-mole) 

EXCESS AIR, (%) 

STACK GAS VELOCITY, (fpm) 

ACTUAL VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE, (acfm) 

STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE, (dscfm) 

ISOKINETIC, (%) 

grains/actual cubic feet 

micrograms/actual cubic meter 

grains/dry standard cubic feet 

milligrams/dry standard cubic meter at 7% O2 

pounds/hour 

grains/dry standard cubic feet at 12% CO2 

dry standard cubic feet/million Btu (F-Factor) 

pounds/million Btu 

43.79 45.46 44.93 44.36 

6.90 6.58 7.38 7.14 

28.22 28.27 28.17 28.20 

706.1 676.5 706.1 706,1 

2621.58 2605.16 2633.11 2627.3 

31584 31366 31703 31633.2 

8426 18122 17969 18197.7 

91.6 96.7 96.4 94.0 

2.47E-02 2.94E-02 2.92E-02 0.0269 

5.65E+04 6.73E+04 6.68E+04 61656.2 

4.23E-02 5.09E-02 5.15E-02 0.0469 

5.61E+02 6.49E+02 6.84E+02 622.8 

6.68E+00 7.91E+00 7.93E+00 7.306 

3,38E-01 3.82E-01 4.12E-01 0.375 

9190 9190 9190 9190.0 

4.84E-01 5.59E-01 5.89E-01 0.536 

KFBRICKM8 data TSP M5 
Summary of Hydrogen Fluoride Emissions 

Redland Brick 

KF Brick Plant 

South Windsor, Connecticut 

RUN NUMBER: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

M264 M26-2 M26-3 

07114104 07114104 07114/04 

1208-1308 1331-1431 1451-1551 

Average 

REQUIRED INPUT DATA 

TOTAL HF COLLECTED, (mg) 

AVEP.•.GE DRY GAS M.FTFR TEMPERATURE. (°F) 

DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR 

TOTAL SAMPLE TIME, (minutes) 

VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLED, (ft 3) 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (" Hg) 

AVG. ORIFICE PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL, (" H20) 

HF MOLECULAR WEIGHT 

8.160 8.450 9.630 8.747 

80 84 88 84 

0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 

60 60 60 60 

4. 580 4.167 4.901 4. 549 

29.79 29.80 29.80 29.80 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 

CARBON IN FUEL, (%) 

SULFUR IN FUEL, (%) 

NITROGEN IN FUEL, (%) 

OXYGEN IN FUEL, (%) 

GCV, (BTU/Ib) 

02 IN STACK GAS, (%) 

CO2 IN STACK GAS, (%) 

STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE, (dscfm) 

18.5 18.4 

1.5 1.6 

18426 18122 

18.5 

1.5 

17969 

18.5 

1.5 

18172 

CALCULATED DATA 

VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED, (dscf) 

SAMPLING RATE, (liters/minute) 

HF CONCENTRATION, (pounds/dscf) 

grams/dry standard cubic meters 

parts per million 

parts per million at 7% O2 

pounds/hour 

4.24 3.84 4.48 4.19 

2.00 1.81 2.11 1.98 

4.24E-06 4.86E-06 4.74E-06 4.61E-06 

6.79E-02 7.78E-02 7.59E-02 7.39E-02 

81.57 93.46 91.23 88.75 

472.45 519.65 528.36 506.82 

4.69E+00 5.28E+00 5.11 E+00 5.03E+00 

KF Bdck hd data HF sample & lab GamAir,#m 08 
Summary of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions 

Redland Brick 

KF Brick Plant 

South Windsor, Connecticut 

RUN NUMBER: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

M26-t M26-2 M26-3 

07114104 07114104 07114/04 

t208-1308 1331-1431 t451-155t 

Average 

REQUIRED INPUT DATA 

TOTAL HCI COLLECTED, (rag) 

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER TEMPERATURE, (OF) 

DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR 

TOTAL SAMPLE TIME, (minutes) 

VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLED, (ft 3) 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (" Hg) 

AVG. ORIFICE PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL, (" H:•O) 

HCI MOLECULAR WEIGHT 

3.630 3.820 4.150 3.867 

80 84 88 84 

0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 

60 60 60 60 

4.580 4.167 4.901 4.549 

29.79 29.80 29.80 29.80 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

36.45 36.45 36.45 36.45 

CARBON IN FUEL, (%) 

SULFUR IN FUEL, (%) 

NITROGEN IN FUEL, (%) 

OXYGEN IN FUEL, (%) 

GCV, (BTU/Ib) 

02 IN STACK GAS, (%) 

CO2 IN STACK GAS, (%) 

STANDARD VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE, (dscfm) 

18.5 18.4 18.5 18.5 

1.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 

18426 18122 17969 18172 

CALCULATED DATA 

VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED, (dscf) 

SAMPLING RATE, (liters/minute) 

HCI CONCENTRATION, (pounds/dscf) 

grams/dry standard cubic meters 

parts per million 

parts per million at 7% O2 

pounds/hour 

4.24 3.84 4.48 4.19 

2.00 1.81 2.11 1.98 

1.89E-06 2.20E-06 2.04E-06 2.04E-06 

3.02E-02 3.52E-02 3.27E-02 3.27E-02 

19.91 23.18 21.57 21.56 

115.32 128.90 124.94 123.05 

2.08E+00 2.39E+00 2.20E+00 2.22E+00 

M26 sample & lab 

0O9 

GamAir 
Emission Calculation Symbols 

Required Input Data 

PB 

AS 

DN 

TF 

¥ 

CP 

SQRT DP 

DH 

TM 

PS 

T• 

VM TOT 

VI 

C02 

O2 

CO 

N2 

MN 

•=uel Analysis Innut 

%H 0 

%C 0 

%S 0 

%N 0 

%O 0 

GCV 0 

T STD 68 

P STD 29.92 

LP 0.001 

LA 0.02 

29.79 barometric pressure, (" Hg) 

12.04 area of stack, (ft 2) 

0.309 nozzle Diameter, (inches) 

60 total sampling time, (minutes) 

0.991 dry gas meter calibration factor 

0.84 pilot tuba coefficient, dimensionless 

0.6093 average velocity pressure (square root), (" H20) 

°86 average orifice pressure differential, (" H2 O) 

85 average dry gas meter temperature, (•F) 

0.31 stack static pressure, (" 

R7• F average stack _gas temDeratura, 

45.601 volume of gas sampled, (ft 3) 

69 total moisture collected, (ml) 

1.5 CO2 in stack gas (dry basis), 

18.5 O2 in stack gas (dry basis), % 

0 CO in stack gas (d•/basis), % 

80 N2 in stack gas (dry basis), % 

120 total analyte collected, (milligrams) 

percent by weight of hydrogen in fuel 

percent by weight of carbon in fuel 

percent by weight of sulfur in fuel 

percent by weight of nitrogen in fuel 

percent by weight of oxygen in fuel 

gross calorific value of fuel, Btu/•b 

standard temperature, (°F) 

standard pressure, (" Hg) 

final leak rate of sampling train, (ff3/min) 

allowable leak rate of sampling train, (ff3/min) 

I. Volume of Dr/Gas Sampled (DSCF), dr/standard cubic feet 

DSCF (VMTOT) x (Y) x [(TSTD+460)/(TM+460)] x |(pS+DHI13.6)I20.92] 

DSCF 43.79 

2. Moisture In Stack Gas (%H:O), percent 

% H=O 100 x [(0.04707 x VI)I [DSCF (0.04707 x VI)] 

%H=0 6.90 

3. Stack Gas Wet Molecular Weight (MWS), Ib/Ib-mole 

MWS [(0.44 x COz) (0.28 x CO) (0.28 x N=) (0.32 x Oz)] x [1 (%H2OI100)] (0.18 x %H=0) 

MWS 28.22 

4. Average Stack Gas Density (DST), pound per cubic feet 

DST (0.0458) x MWS x [(pB (PS/13.6)/('rs 460)] 

DST 0.0459 

010 
Excess Nr (EA), % 

EA 100 x [(02 (0.5 x CO)) (0.264 x N2) (02 (0.5 x CO))] 

EA 706.11 

6. Stack Gas Velocity (FPM), feet per minute 

FPM 5129.4 x CP x SQRTDP x SQRT[(TS +460)/(PB (PS/13.6)) x MSW] 

FPM 2621.584 

7. Actual Volumetric Flow Rate (Q), actual cubic feet per minutaQ FPM x AS 

Q 31564 

8. Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (Q STD), d•y standard cubic feet per minute 

QSTD Q x [1-(%HzO/100)] x [(TSTD+ 460)/(TS +460)] x [pB+ (PS/13.6)129.92| 

Q STD 18426 

9. Isokinetic Factor (IK), % 

IK [5.67 x (TS +460) x DSCF]/[(PB+ (PS/13.6)) x FPM x TT x (1- (%H20/100)) x (DN x 0.7854)/144] 

IK 91.6 

10. Actual Analyta Concentration (C), grains per actual cubic feet 

C [0.01543 x MN x ('I'STD 460) x (PB+ (PS/13.6)) x (1-(%H2OI100)]I(DSCF x (TS+ 460) 29.92) 

C 0.024683 

tl. Actual Analyte Concentration Corrected To Stack Conditions (Cd), micrograms per actual cubic meter 

Cd [1000 x MN x (TSTD+460) x (PB (PS/13.6)) x (1- (%H2OI100))]1 (0.02832 x (TS +460) x 29.92) 

Cd 56486.63 

Oil 
12. Anslyte Concentration Corrected To Dry Standard Conditions (Csm), milligrams/dry standard cubic meters 

Anelyta Concentration Corrected To Dry Standard Conditions (Cs), grains/dry standard cubic feet 

Csm (MN/DSCF) x 35.31 Cs 0.01543 x (MN/DSCF) 

Csm 96.76 mllligrams/dscm Cs 4.23E-O2 gmins/dscf 

13. Analyta Emission Rata (ER), pounds per hour 

ER 0.008571 x •s Q STD 

ER 6.677695 pounds per hour 

14. F Factor (F), DSCF per million British thermal units 

F 1000000 x [(3.64x%H)+(1.53x%C)+(O.57x%S)+(O.14x%N)-(O.46x%O)]/GCV 

F #DIV/01 DSCF per million Btu 

15. Analyta Emission Rate (EBTU), pounds per million Btu 

EBTU 0.0001429 x Cs x F x (20.9/(20.9- 02)) 

EBTU #OIV/01 pounds/million BTU 

16. Anelyta ConcentraUon Corrected to Dry Standard Conditions and 12% CO= (Cs 12%CO=), milligrams/dscm at 12% CO= 

Csm12%CO2 Csm x (12 CO2) 

Csm12%CO2 774.0791 mg/dscm @ 12% CO2 

17. Analyte Concentration Corrected to Dry Standard Conditions and 7% O= (Cs •7%O=), mg/dscm at 7% O2 

Csm7%02 Csm x [(20.9 7.0) (20.9 02)] 

Csm7%O2 560.40 mg/dscm @ 7% O2 
Appendix C 

Field Da• Sheets 

54•-0401 Redland Brick report GamAir,com 

o• 
t: 

Appendix D 

Process Monitoring Data 

•t7•] Redland Bfi• •rt GamAir,com 
FAX •s inctudin cover she•t 

TO: 

Phone 

0 • <• • 2"Z 7.. 

[• Urgent [• For your •vlew [• Reply A,•AP •' Please" commen• 

REMARKS: 

,•, 

.;,• ,•,,: 

',,'..•. ,'., ,• 

,•.,•, .•' 

.•),1•, 

/,• :•. 

,!,.•,,,•., 

,.,'• •.! 

,• 

TOTAL P.g• 
Appendix E 

Labo•to• •alyflcal DaM 

547-0401 •land Brick report GamAir.©om 
LAB ORA TOR Y ANAL YSIS REPORT ESIS Environmental Health Laboratory 

100 Sebethe Drive, Suite A-5 

Cromwell, CT 06416 

(860) 635-6475 or (g00) 243-4903 

State of Connecticut Approval #PH 0510 

Lab Accreditations: AIHA #144, AIHA ELLAP #6945 

To: John Gammie 

Gammie Air Monitoring 

28 Canton Rd.. 

West Simsbury, CT 06092 

Report #: C0417683 

P.O. No.: 547-0401-02 

547-0401 

Date Received: 7/16/2004 

Date Reported: 8/2/2004 Page 1 of 1 

Analysis: Inorganic Acids 

Analytical Method: Ion Chromatography; EPA 26 

Sample Imp. Volume 

Number • Component u_g 

M26-1 30 Hydrofluoric Acid 8160 

Hydrochloric Acid 3630 

M26-2 30 Hydrofluoric Acid 8450 

Hydrochloric Acid 3820 

M26-3 30 Hydrofluoric Acid 9630 

Hydrochloric Acid 4150 

M26-4 Blank Hydrofluoric Acid <63.2 

Hydrochloric Acid <61.7 

Detection Limit: 2.11 ug/mL 

Detection Limit: 2.06 ug/mL 

Samples analyzed by ion chromatography are quantitated by matching the retention times of sample peaks 

with those of known compounds. A matching retention time is not proof of chemical identity. 

Concentrations reported are based on air volumes provided. 

Analyst: Ben Miller 

Date: 
ESIS Risk Control Services 

One of the ACE Group of Companies 

100 Sebethe Drive Suite A-5 

Cromwell, CT 06416 

(860) 63526475; (800) 243-4903 FAX (860) 635-6750 

REQUEST FOR ANALYTICAL SERVICES 

(Please-fill all blanks to help us better serve you) 

RUSH 

,t?.leccye qall 

FOR I• USE ONLY 

Lub R•por• No. 

:-,: Und L7 SP• • •IR 

C? ESIS L7 Z f• C/dints 

Fo• Or Co•. No. 

Send INVOICE To [A•EOUIRED] 

Name: 

Com•___ny: Company: :": ="' 7 

ni 5 Mailin• Ad•dress: Ma ng Address: : : 

a+.+• •. CiW, S•te, Zip: ,,_: .•:•: .:•, ,, 

Phone No: :2. ":"•; '2 • Phone Results 

PO#, Ref# Of R•uiM): .:. c. "7• %:,•:•. 

Accts. Payable Phone No: Fax No: ,:.., ,.:, ,.,. 

Acf_ts_: Payable Fax No: Emaih :;. ,,. ...... :. ,• 

Sampling Location: Sampling Media: 

Sampling Method: 

Colle•tor's Signature: 

Media 

[] FaxResults 

I• Email Results 

Product Manufactured/Service Rendered: 

Collected by Date/Time 

Date/Time Received by: 

Date/Time Date/Time Received by: 

CHAI• OF Relinquished by: 

•IJSTODVJt r Relinquished by: 

Method of Shipment: 

Authorized( • ': 

nature requtrea) 

NO SAM]PIE 

(Lab Use COI'¢I'AII•R 

Ouly) NO 

Dateg• Sample Condition Upon Receipt: • Acceptable H Unacceptable 

SAM•I.3•qG TIME 

ANALYSIS DESIRKD (Recording s•mpfing date, 

A 3 sample minimum charge •tpplies when Location and Operation. SAMPLING TeLl! 

less than 3 of each specific aual.yle is Other eompouuds present, RATE Time 

requited. etc.) 0iter•mtm) Start .1•1 (mlaute•) 

AIR 

SAMPLE 

VOLUME 

(liters) 

FOR LAB NOTES ONLY: 

DISTRIBUTION: WHITE LAB COPY CANARY LAB FILE COPY PINK CUSTOMER COPY 
GamAir Laboratory Submittal Form 

To: EHL 

From: John S. Gammie 

D•te: 15-Jul-04 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

Item 

•mAJr Project No.: 547-0401 

PO # 547-0401-02 

S•.,• pie Ide•tiflcation Collection Date 

M26-1 7/14/2004 

VI26-2 7/14/2004 

M26-3 7/i 4/2004 

M26-4 b!•_nk 7/14/2004 

Sample 

Volume 

initial 

sample 

VUlUliI• 

A•a;•,sis Requested 

Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) and 

Hydrofluoric Acid (H F) 

30 ml with EPA Method 26 

(ion chromato•lraphy) 

Comments: Initial impinger content was 30 ml 

Lab Submittal Form EPA M26 GamAir.com 
GamAir Laboratory Submittal Form 

To: PSC Anal•ical Services, Inc. 

From: Leigh Gammie 

Date: 15-Jul-04 

Item Collection Date 

GamAir Project No.: 547-0401 

PO # 547-0401-01 

Sample Identification 

• M8-1 

M8-2 

'• M8-4 Blank 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

•16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

3O 

14-Jul-04 

14-Jul-04 

t A I•=l_rtA 

14-Jul-04 

Sample 

Volume 

Analysis Requested 

sample 

VO!,j..m.e 

200 ml 

initial Sulfur dioxide per EPA 

Method 8 

Comments: 

Leb Submittal Form EPA M8 

024 

GamAir.com 
Certificate of Analysis 

CLIENT INFORMATION 

Attention: 

CHent Name: 

Project: 

Project Desc: 

Leigh Gammie 

Gammie Air Monitoring, LLC 

547 0401 

Address: 28 Canton Road 

West Simsbury, CT 

06092 

Fax Number: 860-658-2223 

Phone Number: 860-658-4929 

LABORATORY INFORMATION 

Contact: Ancy Sebastian 

Project: AN041077 

Date Received: 16-Jul-2004 

Date •eported: 23-Jul-2004 

Submission No.: 4G0743 

Sample No.: 044438-044442 

NOTES: "-' not analysed '<' less than Method Detection Limit (MDL) 'NA no data available 

LOQ can by determined for aH analytes by multiplying the appropriate MDL X 3.J3 

Solids data is based on dry weight except for biota analyses. 

Organic analyses are not corrected for extraction recovery standards except for isotope 

dilution methods, (i.e. CARB 429 PAIl, all PCDDIF and DBDIDBF analyses) 

The enclosed copy of the Chain of Custody Record may contain information necessary for the 

interpretation of the data. 

Methods used by PSC Analytical Services are based upon those found in 'Standard Methods for the Examination of 

Water and Wastewater', Twentieth Edition. Other methods are based on the principles of MISA or EPA methodologies. 

New York State: ELAP Identification Number 10756. 

All work recorded herein has been done in accordance with normal professional standards using accepted testing 

methodologies, quality assurance and quality control procedures except where otherwise agreed to by the client 

and testing company in writing. Any and all use of these test results shall be limited to the actual cost of the 

pertinent analysis done. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Your samples will be retained at 

PSC Analytical Services for a period of three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. 

COMMENTS: 

Page 1 of 3 

PASC Summary of Analysis Pre. Dates Page MS-3 of 3 

7/28/2004 

Batch Code: 

Impinger volume measured 

Date Analysed: 

Date Prepared: 

Batch Code: 

Sulphur Dioxide 

Date Analysed: 

Date Prepared: 

0722BAA1 

044439 04 

04444004 

044441 04 

044442 04 

04/07/22 

04/07/22 

0722BAA1 

044438 04 

044439 04 

044440 04 

044441 04 

044442 04 

04/07/22 

04/07/22 

PSC Submission No: 4G0743 Client: Gammie Air Monitoring, LLC Project: 547 0401 
JUL-I•-Z•t4 1- •; lb W•L. HP•HLY It•HL 

NOT ZCE •0F•AM pI•E_R • •EI_pT•_I• •p_ANALI•I CAL•ER• Z CES 

Attention= L•i•h Ga•uie 

Client= Ga=•ie Ai• •onitoring, L•C 

Re Client Project: 54• 0401 

¥•X #: 860-6•8-2223 

•hone #: 860-658-4929 

PSC Pro•ecE Manager= 

were received in good •on•itionunless 

SAMPLE LISTING 

Philip Date 

ID # Sample ID Sampled Received 

044439 MS-Blank SO2 

044440 MS-1 SO2 

044441 M8-2 SO2 

044442 M8-3 S02 

04/07114 

041071•4 

o4/o•I14 

o4/o•/14 

o•/o•/l• 

o4/o•/• 

o4/o7/• 

o•/o•/z• 

Cooler Temperature upon 

CommentS: 

DaCe o•/o7/19 

098 

TOTAL P.01 
Appendix F 

Equipment Calibrations 

547-0401'Redland Brick report •amAir.com 
PiI•t lD: 4/o 

Probe 

P•tot 

Probe 

b 

•• (EPA MeUlod 2) 

b•_O 

d_>3" 1,051• < P_< 1.50D• 

e >_. 8/4" 

f•_2" 

Page ld2 

d: .•. / oo 

e: o ,•°+ 
8 

e= •4..•"... (eo"<e<'•oo °) 

o'-'- •,•..3 (eo"<o'< '0oo °) 

e= ? "•" •' 

c. 

D. •1 < lj3• 
Nozzle Set: 

Nozzle No. 

119 

120 

121 

122 

123 

124 

101 

102 

103 

104 

105 

106 

107 

108 

80 

81 

82 

83 

84 

85 

86 

87 

61 

62 

BOX 1 

1-1 

1-2 

1-3 

1-4 

BOX 2 

2-1 

2-2 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

Nozzle Calibration Data 

Date: 3/30/04 

I.D. #1 • I.D. #3 

0.502 0.501 0.501 

0.505 0.5G5 =• 

0.357 0.3605 0.359 

0.362 0.362 0.363 

0.351 0.353 0.351 

0.429 0.43 0.431 

0.341 0.339 0.3405 

0.335 0.335 0.337 

0.3105 0.307 0.3105 

0.3095 0.3105 0.311 

0.376 0.374 0.377 

0.387 0.389 0.386 

0.371 0.373 0.371 

0.378 0.377 0.377 

0.243 0.242 0.242 

0.242 0.242 0.241 

0.253 0.253 0.255 

0.251 0.2505 0.248 

0.259 0.259 0.257 

0.250 0.2505 0.250 

0.254 0.254 0.254 

0.255 0.254 0.254 

0.183 0.183 0.183 

0.183 0.185 0.183 

0.175 0.174 0.176 

0.251 0.249 0.248 

0.246 0.248 0.249 

0.502 0.503 0.501 

0.491 0.489 0.488 

0.188 0.186 0.187 

0.258 0.257 0.2605 

0.321 0.322 0.319 

0.374 0.375 0.375 

0.402 0,4005 0.401 

Stainless Steel 

By: 

Avera•e 

0.501 

0;50_5 

0.359 

0.362 

0.352 

0.430 

0.340 

0.336 

0.309 

0.310 

0.376 

0.387 

0.372 

0.377 

0.242 

0.242 

0.254 

O.250 

0.258 

0.250 

0.254 

0.254 

0.183 

0.184 

0.175 

0.249 

0.248 

0.5O2 

0.489 

0,187 

0.259 

0.321 

0.375 

0.401 

TGG 

GamAir 
E 

E 

II 

II 

E 
Z 

0 
Appendix A 

Fibres and Diagrams 

•47• Redland Bri• report' GamAir,com 
50 

"4O 

4O 

3O 

24 oz" 25 

A 

1 

3 

3 

4 

5 

? 

$ 

9 

10 

11 

12. 

4 6 8 10 12 

6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1 

25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 6.7 

75.0 2•,lr• 3_9.4 14.6 11.8 

93.3 70,4 32.3 22.6 17.7 

85.4 •7.7 34.2 25.0 

•5.6 80.6 65.8 35.6 

89,5 77.4 64.4 

96.8 85.4 75.0 

91 8 82 3 

97.4 88.2 

93.3 

97.9 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 
| 

•w• 
• 

EPA Method 26 

Hydrochlodo Acid Sampling Train 

Appendix B. 

Results and Calculations 

547•I Redia• Bri•k report