alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1705 

To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. PERRY (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. BROOKS, and Mr. 

KELLY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Sovereignty 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 115 of the Clean Air Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 7415) is repealed. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

10 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

11 7410(a)(2)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘sections 126 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1705 IH

1 and 115 (relating to interstate and international pollution 

2 abatement)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 126 (relating to inter3 state pollution abatement)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 56165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-00509; FRL-5749-5]


Notice of Availability of Pesticide Data Submitters List

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of an updated version 
of the Pesticide Data Submitters List which supersedes and replaces all 
previous versions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: John Jamula, Office of 
Pesticide Programs (7502C), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., 
SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office location for commercial courier 
delivery and telephone number: Rm. 226, Crystal Mall No. #2, 1921 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, (703) 305-6426.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

    The Pesticide Data Submitters List is a compilation of names and 
addresses of registrants who wish to be notified and offered 
compensation for use of their data. It was developed to assist 
pesticide applicants in fulfilling their obligation as required by 
sections 3(c)(1)(f) and 3(c)(2)(D) of the Federal Insecticide, 
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and 40 CFR part 152, subpart E 
regarding ownership of data used to support registration. This notice 
announces the availability of an updated version of the Pesticide Data 
Submitters List which supersedes and replaces all previous versions.

II. Ordering Information

    Microfiche copies of the document are available from the National 
Technical Information Service (NTIS): ATTN: Order Desk, 5285 Port Royal 
Road, Springfield, VA 22161; Telephone: 703-487-4650. When requesting a 
document from NTIS, please provide its name and NTIS Publication Number 
(PB). The NTIS Publication for this version of the Pesticide Data 
Submitters List is PB97-205629.

III. Electronic Access

    The Pesticide Data Submitters List is available on EPA's worldwide 
web site on the Internet. The Internet address of EPA's web site is 
www.epa.gov. To Access the Data Submitters List from the EPA Home Page, 
select ``Databases and Software.'' From the next page, select ``Media 
Specific.'' The Pesticide Data Submitters List may also be found by 
searching for the key words ``data submitters list'' from the EPA Home 
Page, or may be accessed directly on the EPA web site, by going 
directly to: http://www.epa.gov./opppmsd1/DataSubmittersList/
index.html. Note that this address is case sensitive.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection.

    Dated: October 16, 1997.
Richard D. Schmitt,
Acting Director, Information Resources and Services Division, Office of 
Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 97-28668 Filed 10-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
NO. 07-08 -015 6-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D JU LY9, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ JAMES AL LEN W ALK ER, APP ELL ANT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M CRI MI NA L DIS T RI CTCOU RTNO. ONE OF TAR RA NTCOU NT Y; NO . 107 6378D ; H ON ORABLE SH AR EN W ILSO N, JU DG E

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON Appel lan t, James All en W alker , f il ed a noti ce of appeal chal len g ing hi s c onv icti on for burglary

of a hab itation , enh ance d. On April 2, 2008 , the trial court g rante d App ellant ’s Mo ti on for

N ew Tri al. Pe ndi ng before thi s C our t i s A ppel lan t’ s M oti on toD is mis s A ppeal as Mo ot. W e g ra nt t he moti on.2

W hen t he tr ial co urt g ra nts a moti on for newtri al, i t rest ores the c ase to i ts posi ti on before the forme r tri al. T ex. R. App . P. 21.9(b). Beca use there i s no convi ction from w hich to ap peal , we have no jur is dicti on to co nsi der Appel lan t’ s a ppeal . See Waller v. Sta te , 931 S.W .2d 640 , 643 -44 (Te x .Ap p.– Dallas 199 6, no pet. ). Con seq uentl y , Ap pel lan t’ s M oti on toD is mis s i s g ra nted and t h e a p p e a l i s d is mis sed. No moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.

Pat rick A. Pirtle Justice Do not p ubl is h.
#### Louise R. MESIROW, Appellant, v. NEW PORT THEATRE CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Polling Results letter
#### WARRINGTON CLEANERS & LAUNDRY et al., Petitioners, v. Philip H. DAVIS et al., Respondents.

No. 44643.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 5, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-60190

Summary Calendar

LINDA FAYE SIMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:00-CV-289-P-B

--------------------------------------------------------

February 17, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Linda Faye Sims appeals the district court’s denial of her complai nt challenging the Social

Security Commissioner’s decision to deny Sims supplemental security income benefits based upon

her condition of insulin dependent diabetes and diabetes retinopathy. She argues that the decision

of the administrative law judge (ALJ) that Sims could perform past relevant work was not supported

by substantial evidence, that the ALJ did not sufficiently consider Sims’s subjective complaints of painand functional limitations, and that the case should be remanded to allow further development of the

record.

The record reveals that the ALJ considered Sims’s testimony about pain and her functional

limitations resulting from her long-time condition of diabetes, that the ALJ articulated reasons for not

crediting all of Sims’s testimony about her limitations, and that the ALJ’s decision that Sims could

perform her past relevant work was supported by substantial evidence. S ee Falco v. Shalala

, 27 F.3d

160, 162 (5th Cir. 1994); Leggett v. Chater , 67 F.3d 558, 564 (5th Cir. 1995). Even if the record

did not support the ALJ’s finding that Sims could perform a full range of medium level work, there

was substantial evidence supporting the ultimate determination that she could perform past relevant

work. S ee Shave v. Apfel

, 238 F.3d 592, 595 (5th Cir. 2001). The record also indicates that the ALJ

sufficiently developed it, and Sims does not identify how the record should be further developed.

Sims’s argument that the case should be remanded for further development is without merit.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial
  Commercial Corp. (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2002 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
  pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

  By: /S/ BERNARD KORN
  --------------------
  Name:  BERNARD KORN
         Chief Executive Officer



  November 14, 2003



<PAGE>
#### Shirla COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-824.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### James BERRYHILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 15, 1971.

James Berryhill, in pro. per., for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Ward v. State, 236 So.2d 187 (Fla.App.1970).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 97-11244

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

WILBERT NORWOOD STARKS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-1975-H)

July 16, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We granted Wilbert Norwood Starks, Texas state prisoner

#388071, a certificate of appealability to appeal the district

court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition as barred by the

one-year statute of limitations provided in the Antiterrorism and
-2-

Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d)(1). See Starks v. Johnson, No. 97-11244, slip op. at 1

(Jan. 9, 1998 5th Cir.)

Starks argues that the district court erred in dismissing his

petition as time-barred because the pendency of his third state

habeas application tolled the one-year limitations period. Without

tolling, Starks had one year from April 24, 1996, the effective

date of AEDPA, to file a timely federal habeas petition. See

United States v. Flores, 135 F.3d 1000, 1005-6 (5th Cir. 1998).

The pendency of Starks’ third state habeas application may have

tolled the limitations period under § 2244(d)(1). See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d)(2). Even assuming that § 2244(d)(2) tolled the

limitations period, however, the record is not sufficiently

factually developed to enable us to determine whether Starks’

petition was timely filed because it is not evident on the record

when Starks forwarded his § 2254 petition to prison officials for

mailing. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988); Cooper v.

Brookshire, 70 F.3d 377, 378 (5th Cir. 1995).

The district court did not have the benefit of our decision in

Flores. It did not address whether the pendency of Starks’ third

state habeas application tolled the one-year statute of limitations

of § 2244(d)(1), and did not address whether Starks’ federal

petition, which the district court received on August 12, 1997, was

delivered to prison officials for mailing prior to that time.
-3-

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment dismissing Starks’

§ 2254 application as time-barred is VACATED, and the case is

REMANDED for a determination of these issues and for further

proceedings if the court determines, on remand, that Starks’ § 2254

petition was timely.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
Southwest Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Plan 

Checklist Item #22 

Does the application include a discussion of any other factors the plan sponsor took into account 

including how and why those factors were taken into account? See Section 5.04. 

Document 20.1 contains the description of all of the factors the Board of Trustees of the Southwest Ohio 

Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Plan took into account in the determination that all reasonable 

measures have been taken to avoid insolvency, including how and why such factors were taken into 

account. 

Document 22 

SWORCCPP-000161
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5921-6]


Announcement and Notice of Availability of the Guidance on EPA 
Participation in Bankruptcy Cases

SUMMARY: The purpose of this guidance is to identify the factors to be 
considered by the Environmental Protection Agency in determining 
whether to participate in a bankruptcy case, including whether to 
pursue collection of costs or penalties against debtors who have 
liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 
and Liability Act (CERCLA) or other environmental statutes. This 
guidance also addresses issues in bankruptcy cases relating to the 
abandonment of contaminated property, cleanup activities under CERCLA 
on property included in the bankruptcy estate, and the impact of the 
automatic stay on different types of administrative and judicial 
enforcement activities. It supersedes the ``Guidance Regarding CERCLA 
Enforcement Against Bankrupt Parties,'' OSWER Directive #9832.7 (May 
24, 1984) and the ``Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guidance,'' 
OSWER Directive #9832.8 (May 23, 1986).

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Madigan, USEPA Region IV, 61 
Forsyth Street, Atlanta, GA 30303. Phone: (404) 562-9518. Copies of the 
document are available from the Policy and Guidance Branch, Policy and 
Program Evaluation Division, Office of Site Remediation Enforcement, 
401 M St., SW, 2273A, Washington, D.C. 20460. Phone: (202) 564-5115. 
The guidance document is also available electronically at <a href="http://
www.epa.gov/envirosense/oeca/osre/osredoc.html">http://
www.epa.gov/envirosense/oeca/osre/osredoc.html</a>. Copies of the policy 
can be ordered from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 
22161. Each order must reference the NTIS item number, PB98-103146. For 
telephone orders or further information on placing an order, call NTIS 
at (703) 487-4650 or (800) 553-NTIS. For orders via E-mail/Internet, 
send to the following address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#620d1006071011220c160b114c040706150d100e064c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e110c1a1b0c0d3e100a170d50181b1a09110c121a50191108">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
Steven A. Herman,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Enforcement and Compliance 
Assurance.
[FR Doc. 97-30014 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2984]


Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

    The Islands of Saipan and Tinian in the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands constitute a disaster area as a result of 
damages caused by Super Typhoon Joan which occurred October 18, 1997. 
Applications for loans for physical damages as a result of this 
disaster may be filed until the close of business on December 29, 1997 
and for economic injury until the close of business on July 29, 1998 at 
the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. 
Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 13795, 
Sacramento, CA 95853-4795.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Percent  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage                                                     
    Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.............        7.625
    Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..........        3.812
    Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.............        8.000
    Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit              
     Available Elsewhere...................................        4.000
    Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             
     Available Elsewhere...................................        7.125
For Economic Injury                                                     
    Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without              
     Credit Available Elsewhere............................        4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 298406 
and for economic injury the number is 963300.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: October 29, 1997.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-29757 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 23.1

 

SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs

*PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS*

www.sealebeers.com

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

 

We consent to the use, in the statement onForm 10K of EnzymeBioSystems, of our report dated October 10, 2012 on our audit of the financial statements of EnzymeBioSystemsas of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity(deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended, for the period from inception on June 26, 2009 through June 30, 2012,and the reference to us under the caption “Experts.”

 

 

 

***/s/******Seale and Beers, CPAs***

 

Seale and Beers, CPAs

Las Vegas, Nevada

October 11, 2012

 

 

 

 

**Seale and Beers, CPAs PCAOB & CPABRegistered Auditors**

**50 S. Jones Blvd Suite 202 Las Vegas,NV 89107 Phone: (888)727-8251 Fax: (888)782-2351**
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29849]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review, discuss and evaluate grant 
applications.
    Committee Name: Subcommittee D--Clinical Research Studies.
    Date: December 2-3, 1997.
    Time: 8 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Martin H. Goldrosen, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
EPN, Room 635C, Bethesda, MD 20892-7408, Telephone: 301-496-7930.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: November 6, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29849 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
# C_2006202EN.01003401.xml

| 25.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/34

---

Corrigendum to the budget for Europol for 2007

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 180 of 2 August 2006
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 180 of 2 August 2006

(2006/C 202/11)

On page 6, in the line ‘TOTAL REVENUE, PART C’, in the column ‘Outturn 2005 (EUR)’:

TOTAL REVENUE, PART C

for:

‘2 314 2005’,

read:

‘2 314 200’.

On pages 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 the heading of the third column of the table:

for:

‘Outturn 2005

(EUR)’,

read:

‘Draft outturn 2005

(EUR)’.

---