alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Dale Riker, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Teucrium Trading, LLC, the Sponsor of Teucrium Commodity Trust (the “Registrant”), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to the report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


By:
/s/Dale RikerDale RikerTreasure/Principal Financial OfficerTeucrium Trading, LLC, Sponsor of Teucrium Commodity Trust





Date:  April 28, 2011
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A legel&r; cc: Chief Judge, The Seventh Judicial District Court

Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge Michael Kapetan Tony Adamoli White Pine County Clerk

4:411 11=INIMEMIBEISIEMISAM 2
U.S. EPA FACT SHEET

Yuba City-Marysville Area Redesignation to Attainment for the 

2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standard

November 20, 2014

Summary

 EPA is redesignating the Yuba City-Marysville area of California to attainment for the 

2006 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 24-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard

(NAAQS).

 EPA is approving the California Air Resources Board’s redesignation request, 

maintenance plan, emissions inventory and motor vehicles budgets. 

 Today’s actions represent a significant milestone in air quality improvements through the 

combined efforts of the Feather River Air Quality Management District, the California 

Air Resources Board, and EPA. 

Background

 In January 2013, EPA issued a determination that the Yuba City-Marysville 

nonattainment area attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard based on complete, qualityassured, and certified ambient air monitoring data for the 2009–2011 monitoring period. 

Particulate Matter and Public Health 

 Particulate matter are commonly referred to as PM2.5 because they have a diameter of 2.5

micrometers or less.

 Reducing PM2.5 levels is essential because these tiny particles can reach the deepest 

regions of the lungs and exposure is linked to a variety of significant health problems 

including damage to lung tissue, cancer and premature death. 

 PM2.5 can be emitted directly into the atmosphere or formed in the atmosphere as a result 

of various chemical reactions from emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide, 

volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and ammonia.

Next Steps

 Today’s actions will be published in the Federal Register in approximately two weeks 

and become effective 30 days after publication. 

For More Information: 

http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/actions/calwide/index.html
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT TONI ANTONELLIS,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,
v. STATE OF C ALIFOR

NIA and AAR ON R OTHB ER G, C H P Offic e r,

De fe nda n ts-Appe lle e s,
and DOES, 1-15, De fe nda

n t. No. 17-55412 D.C . No. 8:15-c v-00024-JVS-JC G
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Jam e s V. Se lna , Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d June 5, 2018 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia 

# FIL ED
JUN 22 2018 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).B e fore : FER NANDEZ a

nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s, a nd B ENNETT, *** Distric t Judge
. Toni Antone l lis a

ppe a ls the distric t c ourt’ s orde r granting sum m ary judgm e nt in fa

vor of de fe nda

nts on he r c la im s for e xc e ssive forc e unde r the Fourth Am e ndm e nt, viola

tion of bodily

inte grity unde r the Fourth a

n d Fourte e nth Am e ndm e nts, a

nd ba tte ry unde r C a lifornia c om m on la w. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a n d we a ffirm
. 1. Whe n vie wing thefa c ts in the light m ost fa vora ble to Antone l lis, no
re a s ona ble juror c ould c onc lude tha t Offic e r R o thbe rg viola

t e d Antone l lis’ s
c onstitutiona

l rights. Se e Mue lle r v . Auk e r , 576 F.3d 979, 993 (9th C ir. 2009). It
wa s obje c tive ly

re a sona ble for Offic e r R othbe rg to ha ndc uff Antone llis for a

tota l of nine m inute s a

nd to prohibit he

r from le aving thesc e ne to use the re stroom ; Antone llis c om

m itte d m u ltipletra ffic viola

tions a n d fle d the sc e n e whe n Offic e r R othbe rg first pulle d he r ove r. Thus, Offic e r R othbe rg is e ntitle d to qua lifie d im m unity
. 2. For the sa

m e re a son, Antone llis’ s ba tte ry c la im fa ils. Se e Arpin v . Santa C lara Valle y Transp. Age nc

y , 261 F.3d 912, 922 (9th C ir. 2001). AFFIRM E D.

* * * The Honora

ble M ark W . B e nne tt, Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the Northe rn Distric t of Iowa , sitting by de signa t ion. 2
#### John CURRY, Petitioner, v. GULF COAST BUILDING et al., Respondents.

No. 43834.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000              JAN-3-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-20-1999             JUN-14-1998
<CASH>                                          19,489                   5,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,662                  53,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,322                   3,772
<INVENTORY>                                     17,587                  24,647
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,461                  86,465
<PP&E>                                         184,198                 194,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,592                 133,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 383,861                 225,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,093                 128,219
<BONDS>                                        275,000                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (477,646)                  23,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   383,861                 225,468
<SALES>                                        453,309                 459,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               516,880                 518,162
<CGS>                                          258,495                 258,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  366,697                 487,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,112                 108,424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   772                     693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,833                   1,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,238                  29,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,338)                   2,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,576                  27,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,576                  27,033
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Group 1 Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert S. Bowen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                                         /s/ Robert S. Bowen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         November 14, 2003


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Group 1 Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark Funston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                                         /s/ Mark Funston
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         November 14, 2003




                                       23
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1154-DR]


Idaho; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Idaho, (FEMA-1154-DR), dated January 4, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 22, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Idaho, is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
January 4, 1997:

    The counties of Kootenai and Benewah for Individual Assistance 
and debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A 
and B) under the Public Assistance program.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-2974 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-85,008-04

IN RE HERRON KENT DUC KETT, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 43,063-B-H-4 IN THE 124 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM G REGG

COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this Court’s orig inal jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Gre g g County

in J uly 2021 and his applica tion has not been prope rly forwa rded to this Court. Respondent, the District Clerk of Gre g g County , shall forwa rd Relator’s habea s application to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habea s application in Gre g g County afte r Dec ember of 2020, or forwa

rd a copy of an order desig nating issues toge ther with corr espondenc e documenting the date the State rec eived Rela tor’s habe as application. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this order within thirty day s from the da te of this order

.2

Filed: Apr il 6, 2022 Do not publish
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

WINE CHILLERS & MISCELLANEOUS REFRIGERATION PRODUCTS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Day, Month Date, 2012

Room 8E-089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties on

the preliminary analyses addressing energy conserva tion standards for wine chillers & miscellaneous

refrigeration products.

Agenda

9:00 – 9:15 am Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review, & Opening Statements

Doug Brookman

9:15 – 9:30 am Regulatory History

Lucas Adin

9:30 – 10:30 am Scope

Detlef Westphalen

10:30 – 10:45 am Break

10:45 – 11:15 am Rulemaking Overview & Framework, Test Procedure

Detlef Westphalen

11:15 – 12:15 am Market and Technology Assess ment, Screening , and Engineering Analyses

Kenneth Nsofor

12:15 – 1:15 pm Lunch

1:15 – 2:00 pm Markups, Energy Use, and Li fe-Cycle Cost/ Payback Period Analyses

Jeffery Greenblatt

2:00 – 2:15 pm Shipments and National Impact Analyses

Jeffery Greenblatt

2:15 – 2:30 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Kenneth Nsofor

2:30 – 2:45 pm NOPR Analyses

Jeffery Greenblatt

2:45 – 3:00 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks

Doug Brookman
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40706 

Conference Calendar

__________________

WINFRED RAY RANDALL,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NEAL BIRMINGHAM,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-80

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights

complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He

contends that the district court erred by determining that his

complaint was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. We

have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation, and the district court's order, and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the

reasons given by the district court. Randall v. Birmingham, No. 
No. 95-40706

-2-

2:95-80 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 1995). We caution Randall that any

additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will

invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Randall

is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that

they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. 

AFFIRMED.
### SERVED: May 15, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### MULTI-AERO, INC. FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2013- 0718 

### AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER Paragraph#2 ofthe Procedural Order is amended as follows: WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. On orbefore July 1, 2014, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, documentproduction, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner;

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Shane Storz, Director ofOperations Multi-Aero, Inc., Respondent 12300 Old Tesson Road, Suite 200F St. Louis, MO 63128 ONE COPY

Jared M. Allen, Respondent's Counsel The Avia:tion Law Firm One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 TEL: 301-294-8550 FAX: 301-294-2525 David B. Kessler, Complainant's Counsel FDMS No. FAA-2013-0718 (Civil Penalty Action)

Directorate Counsel, Office ofRegional Counsel, Central Region, ACE-7 Federal Aviation Administration 901 Locust Street, DOT Building, Room 506 Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3763 FAX: 816-329-3771 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings; M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 ·TEL:· 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant

FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
#### William RADFORD, Petitioner, v. TOWN OF PALM BEACH SHORES, Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-111.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

*37Wallis E. Schulle, of Fisher, Prior, Puritt & Schulle, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Thomas E. Sholts and Ronald E. Jones, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks to review by common-law certiorari an order of the circuit court affirming the petitioner’s conviction in the Municipal Court of the Town of Palm Beach Shores on a charge of violating a municipal ordinance forbidding “Disturbance of the Peace.” Petitioner claims the ordinance to be unconstitutional. This defense was not raised in the trial court, and the circuit judge on appeal refused to consider the defense because of this failure to raise it at trial.

The constitutionality of the ordinance under which petitioner was convicted in the municipal court goes to the very foundation of the validity of the charge against petitioner and hence involves what the courts designate as “fundamental error” which may be considered on appeal even though not raised in the trial court. Sanford v. Rubin, Fla.1970, 237 So.2d 134; Palm Beach County v. Green, Fla.1965, 179 So. 2d 356; Town of Monticello v. Finlayson, 1945, 156 Fla. 568, 23 So.2d 843. The circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, departed from the essential requirements of law when it refused to consider the appellate issue properly before it, to-wit: the constitutionality vel non of the ordinance under which petitioner was convicted.

Certiorari is granted and the order of the circuit court under review is quashed. This cause is remanded to the circuit court in its appellate capacity with directions that it consider and pass upon the question of the constitutionality of the ordinance.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ., and WEHLE, VICTOR O., Associate Judge, concur.
EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

Application 

No. Project/Facility Name Project Type Federal Land Accessed Applicant County

Fiscal 

Year*

NY-15 Interstate Bridge #5- Skinners 

Falls PEL Study Planning Study

National Park Service - 

Upper Delaware Scenic 

River

NYS Department 

of Tranportation Sullivan 2023

NY-19

Montezuma Access 

Improvements

Roadway Resurfacing & 

Parking Lots

Fish and Wildlife Service - 

Montezuma National 

Wildlife Refuge

Town of Tyre Seneca

PE 2024 

CN 2026

The Programming Decisions Committee (PDC) responsible for the New York Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) has selected its multiyear 

Program of Projects. The projects identified for programming for the New York FLAP are listed below by application number and include:

New York Program of Projects for Federal Fiscal Years 2023-2026

* Fiscal Year Programmed/Project Schedule is subject to change

The New York PDC does not have a firm date for the next Call for Projects under the Access Program. Please watch our website for updates in your 

state. https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/programs-access 

If you have any questions regarding the Call for Projects, please contact Mr. Lewis Grimm, Planning Team Leader, at 703-404-6289 or 

Lewis.Grimm@dot.gov. For questions regarding project agreements and funding, please contact Ms. Jacinda Russell, Access Program Manager, at 

571-434-1543 or Jacinda.Russell@dot.gov.
RANGER INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       (formerly Coleco Industries, Inc.)

                                                                      Exhibit 11



                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

              for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1996
                                   (Unaudited)

                                     -------


                                               1997                 1996
                                               ----                 ----

Primary:

   Net loss                                 $   333,512        $    (95,851)

   Average common shares outstanding          4,000,000           4,000,000

   Primary loss per share                   $       .08        $       (.02)


Fully diluted:

   Net loss                                 $   333,512        $    (95,851)

   Average common shares outstanding          4,000,000            4,000,000

   Fully-diluted loss per share             $       .08        $       (.02)










                                                                         Page 19

<PAGE>


                             RANGER INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       (formerly Coleco Industries, Inc.)

                                                           Exhibit 11, Continued


                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

             for the three months ended September 30, 1997 and 1996
                                   (Unaudited)

                                     -------


                                            1997                 1996
                                            ----                 ----

Primary:

   Net loss                              $   499,730       $     (50,127)

   Average common shares outstanding       4,000,000           4,000,000

   Primary loss per share                $       .12       $        (.01)





Fully diluted:

   Net loss                              $   499,730       $     (50,127)

   Average common shares outstanding       4,000,000           4,000,000

   Primary loss per share                $       .12       $        (.01)










                                                                         Page 20

<PAGE>