alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3288

___________________________

Marco Antonio Alavez-Narvaez,

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner,

v.

Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States, 1

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent.

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

 Submitted: June 16, 2017

Filed: July 13, 2017 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Marco Alavez-Narvaez petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an

Jefferson B. Sessions, III issubstituted for his predecessor under Federal Rule 1

of Appellate Procedure 43(c).
immigration judge denying him asylum and withholding of removal. In his pro se

appeal, Alavez challenges the immigration judge’s findings regarding the timeliness

of his asylum application. He argues for the first time that he is a member of a

particular social group whose members are sons of murdered gang leaders. And he

claims that he had a well-founded fear of persecution, because the gang had the

capability and inclination to punish him for trying to obtain information about his

father’s death.

This court lacks jurisdiction to review both the timeliness of Alavez’s asylum

application, see 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3), and Alavez’s unexhausted argument claiming

protected status based on his membership in a particular social group. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(d)(1); Martinez Carcamo v. Holder, 713 F.3d 916, 925 (8th Cir. 2013). We

also conclude that Alavez did not establish a nexus between his feared harm and any

protected ground, as his perceived threat was based on purely personal retribution. 

See Martinez-Galarza v. Holder, 782 F.3d 990, 993-94 (8th Cir. 2015). Accordingly,

we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellee 

 v. 

PAUL WILLIAM BEATTY, 

 Appellant 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

15 WAP 2015 

Jurisdictional Statement 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2015, the Notice of Appeal is hereby 

QUASHED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6223

LEON LORENZO HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

L. BARLOW, Superintendent PRJ; EDWARD I.

GORDON, M.D.; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, in Control

Room; FRED HOOKS, INS inmate; INEZ MEEKS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-110-2)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 15, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leon Lorenzo Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson,

PERRY & WINDELS, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Leon Lorenzo Harris appeals the district court’s January

5, 2005, order instructing Harris he may no longer file any papers

in the action because it was dismissed on August 31, 2005. Because

Harris has failed to establish error with respect to the January 5,

2005, order, we affirm. To the extent Harris desires to have this

court review the August 31, 2005, order dismissing his complaint,

we are without jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not

timely as to that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4. 

Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Harris’ motion seeking

a transfer to another prison. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RAYMOND HILLARY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2362

[ March 4, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Steven Levin , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 2016CF00075B

.

Raymond Hillary, Sneeds, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C ONNER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MARY LEWIS BUTLER,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2013-3171

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in No. AT0752120838-I-2. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

 Mary L. Butler moves for a 30-day extension of time, 

until December 18, 2013, to file her informal brief. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 13-3171 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 12/03/2013
BUTLER V. ARMY 2

The motion is granted.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court

s27

Case: 13-3171 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 12/03/2013
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIELLE WEINBERG,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1847

[March 18, 2021]

Appeal from the Review Appellate Committee of Florida Atlantic 

University, Palm Beach County, Florida; L.T. Case No. ZXXXX5251.

Robin I. Bresky and Jennifer L. Fulton of Law Offices of Robin Bresky, 

Boca Raton, for appellant.

Oscar E. Marrero and Lourdes E. Wydler of Marrero & Wydler, Coral 

Gables, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

___1975, The Times Atlas of the World, Comprehensive Edition:
lew York, Quadrangle, plates 110 and 111, scale 1:2,500,000.

él

ational Office of Lands and Mapping, 1969, Karta Mira, Vancouver:
udapest, scale 1:2,500,000,

chumacher, Glenn M., 1976, Bathymetric map of the Gulf of Alaska:
S. Geological Survey Open File Report 76-822, sheet 1, scale
132,500,000.

cu wZ

U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Ocean Survey, 1973, Seamap Series, North
Pacific Ocean, 13242-123: Washington, D.C., National Ocean Survey,
scale 1:1,000,000,

1974, Seamap Series, North Pacific Ocean, 12042-12B: Washington,

D.C., National Ocean Survey, scale 1:1,000,000.

Jan. 15, 1977, International Chart Series,
D.C,., National Ocean Survey, scale 1:3,500,000,

INT 501: Washington,

l44ew

aN 140°w
eS
“3000
#000 S ,
nes ror OD
OD 0

OPEN FILE REPORT

79-856

4e°N

Mar. 19, 1977, International Chart Series, INT 50: Washington,
D.C., National Ocean Survey, scale 1:10,000,000.
| 8 Q
Q
°o

34°N

a ny 128°W

136°W 134°W 132°W 130°W

I38°W

Albers equal-area conic projection based
on standard parallels 453°N and 294°N

Scale 1:2,500,000

ee EQUAL-AREA BASE MAP OF THE NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN Se

==!
50 e) 50 100 150 200 250 Statute Miles Ticks show dirction of slope
——— a —— a E i E —
50 ° 50 100 150 200 250 Nautical Miles NOR I | [ KAS 5 | ‘ SEC | IO N
C LT E I TT —_ =|

U.S. Geological Survey

ALBERS EQUAL~AREA PROJECTION | Open File Report

This map is preliminary and has
not been edited or reviewed for

COMPILED BY MARYBETH GERIN AND ANDREW J. STEVENSON confornity with Geological Survey
I979
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2004  accompanying  this
certification and filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey F. Feidelberg, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  to the  best of my  knowledge,  pursuant  to ss.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 8, 2004

                                            /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            --------------------------
                                            Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-3749 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

DWS State Tax Free Trust

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 3/31 |
|--------------------------|------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 09/30/09 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0414

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LANCE GARLAND LOVELESS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including June 24, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2020

05/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0414
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2986]


State of Florida

    Manatee County and the contiguous Counties of DeSoto, Hardee, 
Hillsborough, Polk, and Sarasota in the State of Florida constitute a 
disaster area as a result of damages caused by extensive flash flooding 
as a result of severe rains which occurred on October 31, 1997. 
Applications for loans for physical damage may be filed until the close 
of business on January 5, 1998 and for economic injury until the close 
of business on August 4, 1998 at the address listed below or other 
locally announced locations:

U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One 
Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308

    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere.................      7.625
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere..............      3.812
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere.......................................      4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere.......................................      7.125
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere................................      4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 298606 
and for economic injury the number is 963500.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Ginger Lew,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-30268 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1840 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1840

To amend the Small Business Act and the CARES Act to extend the covered 
  period for the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

Ms. Malliotakis (for herself and Ms. Stefanik) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act and the CARES Act to extend the covered 
  period for the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COVERED PERIOD FOR PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 7(a)(36)(A)(iii) of the Small Business Act 
(15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(A)(iii)) is amended by striking ``March 31, 
2021'' and inserting ``June 30, 2021''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 1102(b)(1) of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-
136), as amended by section 323 of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small 
Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act (Public Law 116-260), is amended 
by striking ``March 31, 2021'' and inserting ``June 30, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED INVESTORS CORP. v. HOROWITZ.

No. 39243.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 719.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62001-62002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30415]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Presidential Advisory Committee on High 
Performance Computing and Communications, Information Technology, and 
the Next Generation Internet

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
next meeting of the Presidential Advisory Committee on High Performance 
Computing and Communications, Information Technology, and the Next 
Generation Internet. The meeting will be open to the public. Notice of 
this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 
(Pub. L. 92-463).

DATES: December 9-10, 1997.

ADDRESSES: NSF Board Room (Room 1235), National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: The Presidential Advisory Committee will

[[Page 62002]]

meet in open session from approximately 8:30 a.m. to noon and 1:00 p.m. 
to 5:30 p.m. on December 9, 1997, and from 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. on 
December 10, 1997. This meeting will include briefings on the budgets 
of the five CIC R&D Program Component Areas (High End Computing and 
Computation; Large Scale Networking; High Confidence Systems; Human 
Centered Systems; and Education, Training, and Human Resources) and 
briefings by Federal officials on R&D topics of interest to the 
Committee. Time will also be allocated during the meeting for public 
comments by individuals and organizations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The National Coordination Office for Computing, Information, and 
Communications provides information about this Committee on its web 
site at: http://www,hpcc.gov; it can also be reached at (703) 306-4722. 
Public seating for this meeting is limited, and is available on a 
first-come, first-served basis.

    Dated: November 12, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-30415 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12

                                                    COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
                                    Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                                   (in thousands except ratio data)

<CAPTION>

                                                                                                  Twelve
                                                                                                  Months
                                                             Year Ended December 31,              Ended
                                                -----------------------------------------------
                                                  1997      1998      1999      2000     2001     9/30/02
                                                  ----      ----      ----      ----     ----     -------
<S>                                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds              $55,156   $47,323   $43,207   $40,602   $34,575   $18,629
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt               15,525    23,594    25,878    25,878    27,365    31,999
  Interest on Short-term Debt                     5,104     3,493     2,460     2,412     4,914     3,423
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges                  4,729     4,459     4,659    14,205     3,755     2,716
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals     4,100     5,300     4,600     5,300     4,800     4,800
                                                -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
     Total Fixed Charges                        $84,614   $84,169   $80,804   $88,397   $75,409   $61,567
                                                =======   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

Earnings:
  Income Before Extraordinary Item             $119,379  $133,044  $150,270  $120,202  $191,900  $203,189
  Plus Federal Income Taxes                      69,760    71,202    82,686   116,590    94,148   107,831
  Plus State and Local Income Taxes                   6         3        89       136     8,811    16,795
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above)                  84,614    84,169    80,804    88,397    75,409    61,567
                                               --------  --------  --------  --------  --------  --------
     Total Earnings                            $273,759  $288,418  $313,849  $325,325  $370,268  $389,357
                                               ========  ========  ========  ========  ========  ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                 3.23      3.42      3.88      3.68      4.91      6.32
                                                   ====      ====      ====      ====      ====      ====
</TABLE>
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION

DIVISION OF WATER SUPPLY

INJECTION WELL FEE WORKSHEET

(SUBMIT THIS WORKSHEET WITH EACH PROJECT)

ACTIVITY FEE PAID FEE DUE

1. Innovative technology wells at $1000.00 per project =$ $ 

2. Storm water drainage wells (sinkhole modification, or drilled):

Subdivisions at $500.00 per project =$ $ 

Commercial/industrial facilities $750.00 per project =$ $ 

3. Commercial/industrial geothermal wells:

Open loop systems at $750.00 per facility =$ $ 

4. Commercial/industrial SFDS and infiltration cells at

$500.00 per facility =$ $ 

5. Large capacity septic systems at $250.00 per facility =$ $ 

Churches at $100.00 per facility =$ $ 

6. Remediation wells:

Oversight under this rule at $1000.00 per project =$ $ 

Oversight by the Department not under this rule = N/A 

7. Renewal of storm water drainage wells commercial/

industrial facilities at $350.00 per facility =$ $ 

8. Renewal of commercial/industrial geothermal wells

open loop at $350.00 per facility =$ $ 

9. Renewal of commercial/industrial SFDS and

infiltration cells at $250.00 per facility =$ $ 

10. Renewal of large capacity septic systems at $250.00 per facility =$ $ 

Churches $50.00

TOTAL INJECTION WELL FEE PAID =$ 

TOTAL INJECTION FEE DUE = $ 

Make checks payable to the Treasurer, State of Tennessee and submit to:

Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Water Supply,

6th Floor L & C Tower, 401 Church Street Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1549

Name of Project: 

County: 

Engineer/Owner: 

Payment by: Engineer Other: 

 Address: 

 

STATE USE ONLY FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

PROJECT #: Postmark Date: Date Received: 

 Check #: Cash Deposit #: 

Comments: Receipt #: Cash Deposit #: 

 CN-1189 RDA 2474
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Byron COULON and Aaron Payton.

No. 62442.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Aaron Payton, applying for supervisory and remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted and case is remanded for further proceedings. See our decision in *State v. Payton and Coulon,*No. 62,388, 361 So.2d 866, 1978.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00174-CV

TOM MADDUX, INDIVIDUALLY, AND 

DBA LOST PRAIRIE CYCLES; AKA 

THOMAS EARL MADDUX,

Appellant

v.

MICHAEL D. REID,

Appellee

From the 87th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29,549-A

O R D E R

The Court has reached an impasse in our ability to obtain the reporter’s record in 

this appeal. Appellant contends he has not paid for the reporter’s record because he has 

not received a bill for the record. The reporter has verbally informed the Clerk of this 

Court that the record has not been prepared because she has not been paid. However, 

the reporter will not provide written documentation that she has notified appellant of 
Maddux v. Reid Page 2

the amount necessary to be paid for the reporter to prepare and deliver the reporter’s 

record.

Accordingly, and because the trial court shares the responsibility to see that the 

appellate record is timely filed, see TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c), we abate this proceeding and 

remand it to the trial court. 

The trial court is ordered to hold a hearing, within 21 days from the date of this 

order, to determine and resolve the issue with regard to the amount of payment 

required to obtain the record and a date (or number of days after payment) by which 

the reporter will have the record properly prepared and filed. Further, the trial court is 

ordered to inform appellant that if the reporter’s record is necessary to the appeal and is 

not timely paid for, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finally, the 

trial court is ordered to inform the reporter that the consequences of the reporter failing 

to file the complete and proper record with this Court, as ordered by the trial court 

pursuant to the above order, is that the reporter may be held in contempt of court for 

which the reporter may be ordered to pay a fine and may also be ordered to forfeit her 

fee for the preparation of the reporter’s record.

A record of the hearing and any findings made by the trial court are due to be 

filed in this Court within 35 days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
Maddux v. Reid Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed April 24, 2014