MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013



The following management’s discussion
and analysis (“MD&A”), which is dated as of March 31, 2014, provides a review of the activities, results
of operations and financial condition of Loncor Resources Inc. (the “Company”) as at and for the financial
year of the Company ended December 31, 2013 (“fiscal 2013”) in comparison with those as at and for the financial
year of the Company ended December 31, 2012 (“fiscal 2012”), as well as future prospects of the Company. This
MD&A should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for fiscal 2013 and fiscal
2012 (the “Annual Financial Statements”). As the Company’s financial statements are prepared in United
States dollars, all dollar amounts in this MD&A are expressed in United States dollars unless otherwise specified. Additional
information relating to the Company, including the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F dated March 31, 2014, is available
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.



Forward-Looking Statements



The following MD&A contains forward-looking
statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that the
Company believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future (including, without limitation, statements regarding mineral
resource estimates, exploration results, potential mineral resources, potential mineralization and future plans and objectives
of the Company) are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of
the Company based on information currently available to the Company. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking
statements, and even if such actual results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have
the expected consequences to, or effects on the Company. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially
from current expectations include, among other things, risks related to the exploration stage of the Company's mineral properties,
uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, the possibility that future exploration
results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations, changes in equity markets, changes in commodity prices, failure
to establish estimated mineral resources (the Company’s mineral resource figures are estimates and no assurances can be given
that the indicated levels of gold will be produced), fluctuations in currency exchange rates, inflation, political developments
in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the “DRC”), changes to regulations affecting the Company's activities,
delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required project approvals, the uncertainties involved in interpreting geological data
and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration business. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which
it is made and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update
any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise. Although the Company
believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein.



1







General



The Company is engaged in mineral exploration
with a primary focus on gold. The Company’s main areas of exploration are in the Orientale and North Kivu provinces of the
DRC where the Company holds or controls rights under 64 exploration permits (15,328 square kilometres), directly through a wholly-owned
DRC subsidiary, Loncor Resources Congo SPRL, or under option agreements with the holders of the permits.



During fiscal year 2013, the Company continued
to carry out exploration activities at its Ngayu project in Orientale Province of northeastern DRC. Exploration consisted of gridding,
mapping, soil and stream surveys (including Bulk Leach Extractable Gold (“BLEG”) surveys), augering, rock geochemical
sampling and geophysical induced polarization (“IP”) surveys as well as core drilling within the Ngayu exploration
permit areas.



In a press release dated April 9, 2013,
the Company announced updated mineral resource estimates for the Company's Makapela prospect at the Ngayu project.



In a press release dated April 23, 2013,
the Company announced results of IP surveys at the Company's Nagasa prospect at the Ngayu project. The Company acquired IP equipment
in January 2013 with the objectives of: (a) locating potentially mineralized zones in areas covered by transported overburden where
soil geochemistry is problematic, such as at Nagasa, and (b) testing for “blind” ore bodies where mineralization does
not reach surface.



In a press release dated April 25, 2013,
the Company announced that its common shares would begin trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange effective April 26, 2013 and would
be delisted from the TSX Venture Exchange at the same time.



In a press release dated July 31, 2013,
the Company updated exploration activities at its Ngayu project including announcing drilling results. The Company also reported
that, as a result of the sharp decrease in the gold price in 2013, the Company will be reducing its exploration effort and overhead
costs until market conditions improve.



During August and September 2013, all exploration
work at Ngayu was reviewed and programs were developed for further exploration including drilling once the gold investment market
improves.



Since the end of September 2013 to the
date of this MD&A, the Company has been undertaking mainly assessment of exploration work undertaken earlier in the year at
Ngayu and selecting prospects requiring further investigation in 2014. In addition, new historical data has been obtained and is
being assessed for the North Kivu project in order to select target areas for follow up in 2014.



2







Mineral Properties in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo



The Company’s
exploration activities in the DRC are currently focused on the following projects:



Ngayu Project



The Ngayu
project covers an area of 2,077 square kilometers and is found within the Orientale Province in the northeast of the DRC, approximately
270 kilometers northeast of Kisangani. The Ngayu project is situated within the Ngayu Archaean greenstone belt which is one of
a number of greenstone belts in the north-east Congo Archaean craton that includes the Kilo and Moto (which hosts the Rand Gold
Kibali mine) greenstone belts. These Archaean greenstone belts are the northwestern extensions of the Lake Victoria greenstone
belt terrain that hosts a number of world class gold deposits including Geita and Bulyanhulu.



During
2013, the gold rights relating to the Ngayu project, which were previously held by the Company through an option agreement with
Rio Tinto Exploration RDC Orientale SPRL (“Rio Tinto”), were transferred by Rio Tinto to the Company’s wholly
owned DRC subsidiary, Loncor Resources Congo SPRL, resulting in the Company’s DRC subsidiary now holding directly the 13
exploration permits comprising the Ngayu project.



The Ngayu
project includes a number of exploration prospects already identified such as Makapela, Yindi, Itali, Mondarabe, Nagasa, Matete
and Anguluku.



Makapela prospect



Exploration at Makapela is focusing on
a quartz vein system within a sequence of basalts, thin units of banded iron formation, and dolerite sills. The veins outcrop in
three large artisanal pits (Main, North and Sele Sele) which are each between 170 metres and 290 metres in length, located along
a strike of 2.2 kilometres.



As stated in the Company’s press
release of April 9, 2013, an updated resource statement for Makapela was announced consisting of an Indicated mineral resource
of 614,200 ounces (2.20 million tonnes grading 8.66 g/t Au) and an Inferred mineral resource of 549,600 ounces (3.22 million tonnes
grading 5.30 g/t Au).



Due to the sharp decline in the gold price
during the second quarter of 2013, it was decided not to incur any further expenditure on the Makapela preliminary economic assessment
which had been initiated until the gold market improves.



Itali prospect



The Itali prospect is located in the Matete
area, about 40 kilometres to the north-west of Yindi and 10 kilometres south of Makapela. This prospect is situated on the southern
limb of the west-south-west trending fold in the Imva-Babeyru area, defined by magnetic highs interpreted to be caused by banded
ironstone formation (“BIF”) units. Mineralization was first intersected by trench and core holes, which returned
42.50 metres grading 2.11 g/t Au and 38.82 metres grading 2.66 g/t Au respectively. Artisanal workings and soil sampling results
indicate that there is potential for the mineralized zone to extend over a strike of approximately 1 kilometre.



Ground geophysics and further drilling
will be required to determine the strike potential, and to identify the higher-grade parts of the mineralized package.



3







Mondarabe



Soil sampling and rock chip sampling
at Mondarabe have to date defined two anomalous areas, one the north of the grid in the vicinity of the Mondarabe artisanal
workings, where +100 ppb values (maximum of 2350 ppb) occur over a strike of 960 metres, and one in the southern part of the
grid, on a hill associated with folded BIF. Five diamond drill holes have been completed on the northern anomaly where gold
mineralization is associated mainly with foliation-parallel quartz veins and veinlets within a series of metapelites,
intruded by sills of dolerite and minor quartz porphyry. Shearing has preferentially affected the dolerite, and hydrothermal
fluids have mineralized the shear zones to varying degrees. The most significant mineralized intersections included 10.46
metres grading 2.01 g/t Au, 2.14 metres grading 31.1 g/t Au and 0.66 metres grading 148 g/t Au.



Two drill holes were completed on the southern
soil anomaly, which is associated with folded BIF. Both holes intersected significant widths of BIF, with individual units of up
to 96 metres, interbedded with sericite schist. The BIF is locally quartz-veined and pyritized, the sulphide occurring as disseminated
crystals, massive bands and patches. Despite the fairly widespread hydrothermal alteration, the mineralized zones intersected were
relatively narrow, the best intersections in holes 6 and 7 being 3.23 metres grading 3.78 g/t Au and 1.23 metres grading 9.46 g/t
Au respectively.



Nagasa



The Nagasa prospect is located on the southern
limb of the Imva Fold, and is underlain by schists containing several BIF horizons which strike east-west and dip steeply to the
north. Strike-parallel faults, probably thrusts, are interpreted from the aeromagnetic data. A prominent BLEG anomaly is found
at Nagasa.



The area is characterized by a relatively
complex regolith cover, comprising a colluvial layer up to 3 metres thick containing abundant quartz clasts, overlain by a fine
grained silty clay layer, interpreted to be palaeo-alluvium. The matrix of the colluvium is auriferous and is extensively pitted
by artisanal miners, soil anomalies occurring where the colluvial material has been brought to surface. A +100 ppb soil anomaly
with a strike of 3.5 kilometres is present in the eastern half of the grid, with values of up to 4,070 ppb Au. A second soil anomaly
with a strike of about 1 kilometre occurs in the west.



Due to the overburden (regolith) covering
much of Nagasa, it was decided to undertake geophysical IP ground surveys with the objective of detecting mineralized units below
the regolith cover. IP surveys were conducted over an initial 2 kilometre x 2 kilometre block at Nagasa, and three well-defined
anomalies were delineated. Additional IP surveys were subsequently carried out to the east and west to determine the strike potential
of the anomalies. The southernmost Anomaly (Anomaly 1) has a strike length of at least 6 kilometres, and is associated with zones
of colluvial workings and with localized remnants of colonial mining activity. Pole-Dipole IP arrays were also undertaken to produce
pseudo cross sections which indicated that the higher chargeability anomalies were located at depth.



4







Two diamond drill holes, with a strike
separation of 2,800 metres, were drilled to test Anomaly 1. IP Anomaly 2 was defined over a 2.9 kilometre strike and is located
500 metres north of, and parallel to Anomaly 1. Two wide spaced holes, 500 metres apart, were drilled into Anomaly 2. Again the
higher chargeability anomalies from the Pole-Dipole sections appeared to be more prominent at depth and did not come to surface.
One core hole was also drilled into the 5 delineated 1.6 kilometre IP Anomaly 3 which is located about 1 kilometre north of Anomaly
2, and occurs on a topographic high associated with the main BIF unit. Four other shallower diamond drill holes have also been
completed by the Company at Nagasa. No significant mineralized zones were drilled at IP Anomaly 2 and Anomaly 3 although broad
zones of hydrothermal alteration were intersected while at Anomaly 1, the most significant intersections were 3.72 metres grading
3.17 g/t Au, 2.00 metres grading 2.22 g/t Au and 0.41 metres grading 27.4 g/t Au.



Further closer spaced drilling is required
to delineate discrete mineralization within the broad hydrothermally altered zones at Nagasa.



Matete and Anguluku



IP surveys were undertaken during the quarter
at the Matete and Anguluku prospects where the surface expression of mineralization may be masked by the presence of transported
overburden. Both prospects were initially identified as high priority BLEG targets and the airborne magnetic data indicated structurally
favourable (folded and faulted) BIF. At both Matete and Anguluku, gradient array and pole-dipole IP surveys delineated a number
of IP anomalies requiring follow up core drilling.



Yindi



During the year 2013, previous drilling,
trench and adit sampling data for the Yindi prospect were reviewed and re-interpreted and a number of additional drill targets
were outlined for future drilling. The Company believes that additional drilling has the potential to outline a significant mineral
resource at Yindi



North Kivu Project



The North Kivu project, which is currently
under force majeure, is situated in the North Kivu Province in eastern DRC to the northwest of Lake Edward and consists of 51 exploration
permits totaling 13,251 square kilometers. All but four of these exploration permits are currently under force majeure. Historical
data has been compiled from the colonial period of alluvial gold mining and exploration which has outlined ten gold prospects for
follow-up, the most prospective being the Manguredjipa prospect where 300,000 ounces of alluvial gold was reportedly mined during
the colonial period up to 1960. Other gold prospects warranting follow up include Lutunguru, Lubero, Makwasu, Lutela, Bilolo, Manzia,
Mohanga and Ludjulu.



In addition to gold, there are a number
of alluvial platinum occurrences in the project area including the type locality for the platinum selenide mineral luberaoite near
Lubero. To date no primary source has been found for alluvial platinum occurrences.



Qualified Person



Peter N. Cowley, F.I.M.M.M, the Company’s
President and Chief Executive Officer and a "qualified person" as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101,
has reviewed and approved the technical information in this MD&A.



5







Technical Reports



Additional information with respect to
the Company’s Ngayu project is contained in the technical report of Venmyn Rand (Pty) Ltd dated May 29, 2012 and entitled
"Updated National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Ngayu Gold Project, Orientale Province, Democratic
Republic of the Congo". Additional information with respect to the Company’s North Kivu project is contained in the
technical report of Venmyn Rand (Pty) Ltd dated February 29, 2012 and entitled "National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical
Report on the Manguredjipa Gold Project, North Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo". A copy of each of the said
reports can be obtained from SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov.



Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors



This MD&A has been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. 
Without limiting the foregoing, this MD&A uses the terms, "indicated" and "inferred" resources.  U.S.
investors are advised that, while such terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities laws, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") does not recognize them.  Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified
as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced
or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.  U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part
of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into reserves.  Further, "inferred resources" have a great
amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically.  It cannot be assumed
that all or any part of the "inferred resources" will ever be upgraded to a higher category.  Therefore, U.S. investors
are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the inferred resources exist, or that they can be mined legally or economically. 
Disclosure of "contained ounces" is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations, however, the SEC normally only permits
issuers to report mineral deposits that do not constitute "reserves" as in place tonnage and grade without reference
to unit measures.  Accordingly, information concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources contained in this MD&A,
may not be comparable to information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the
SEC.



U.S. Investors are urged to consider closely
the disclosure in the Company's Form 20-F annual report, File No. 001-35124, which may be secured from the Company, or from the
SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.



Selected Annual Information



The following financial data is derived
from the Company’s consolidated financial statements for each of the three most recently completed financial years. This
financial data has been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).



|                            |  | 2013 |             |   | 2012 |   |            | 2011 | 
|--------------------------- |  | ---- | ----------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | ---- | 
|                            |  |      |             |   |      |   |            |      | 
|Net (loss) income           |  | $    | (27,224,451 | ) |      | $ | (2,081,823 | )    | 
|Net (loss) income per share |  | $    | (0.37       | ) |      | $ | (0.03      | )    | 
|Total assets                |  | $    | 32,182,142  |   |      | $ | 60,274,235 |      | 
|Total liabilities           |  | $    | 1,203,476   |   |      | $ | 2,488,103  |      | 



6







For fiscal 2013, the Company has a net
loss of $27,224,451 mainly due to an impairment of $25,801,443 recorded by the Company to adjust the carrying value of the Ngayu
project to its fair value. For fiscal 2012, the Company had net loss of $2,081,823 which was primarily due to a decreased gain
on derivative financial instruments in fiscal 2012 of $768,264 compared to a gain on derivative financial instruments of $5,215,060
that was recorded in 2011.



Results of Operations



For fiscal 2013, the Company reported a
net loss of $27,224,451 compared to a net loss of $2,081,823 reported for fiscal 2012 and a net income of 533,160 in fiscal 2011.
Expenses capitalized to mineral properties are discussed under the “Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures” section
below. Significant changes in expenses occurred during fiscal 2013 in the expense categories described below as compared to fiscal
2012 and fiscal 2011:



Consulting, management
and professional fees

Consulting, management and professional
fees decreased to $233,092 for fiscal 2013 from $673,277 for fiscal 2012 and $1,191,315 in fiscal 2011. The decrease in management
fees in 2013 compared to 2012 of $153,418 was a result of reduced director fees. Consulting expenses decreased in 2013 to $2,392
from $224,856 in 2012 due to the hiring of a contract consultant as a full time employee. Professional fees, consisting of mainly
legal, audit and accounting fees,decreased by approximately 30% to $144,037 during fiscal 2013 from $205,948 during fiscal 2012,
due to additional legal and accounting fees related to financing activities in fiscal 2012. Consulting expenses decreased in 2012
to $224,856 from $771,413 in 2011 due to decreased investor relations and other corporate advice expenses. For fiscal 2012 professional
fees decreased by 28% to $205,948 during fiscal 2012 from $286,478 in fiscal 2011, mainly related to higher accounting-related
fees in 2011 with respect to the Company’s transition to IFRS effective January 1, 2012.



Travel and promotion

The Company incurred travel and
promotion expenses of $73,037 for fiscal 2013 which significantly decreased from $226,310 incurred fiscal 2012 and $328,439 incurred
in fiscal 2011, due to decreased visits to the Company's projects in the DRC, as well as decreased corporate travel costs in relation
to the Company’s shareholder relations and business promotion activities.



Employee benefits

The Company’s employee
benefits expense increased to $1,054,627 during fiscal 2013 compared to $993,835 recorded during fiscal 2012. The increase was
due to the hiring of a contract consultant as a full time employee and an increase in health benefit expenses for employees as
well fluctuation in foreign exchange rates during 2013 contributing to higher wage expenses. The Company employee benefits expense
decreased to $993,835 during fiscal 2012 compared to $1,015,040 recorded during fiscal 2011 due to decreases in foreign exchange
rates and minimal changes in remuneration.



7







Office and sundry

Office and sundry expenses increased
to $366,713 for fiscal 2013 compared to $281,997 for fiscal 2012 and $375,835 for fiscal 2011. Additional costs were incurred in
2013 and 2011 relating to, respectively, the Company’s listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Company’s listing
on the NYSE MKT.



Impairment of exploration
and evaluation assets

In accordance with IFRS 6, the
Company assessed its exploration and evaluation assets for indications of impairment. Due to a decrease in gold prices in 2013
coupled with the reduction of the exploration budget, the Company conducted an impairment analysis whereby the carrying value of
the Ngayu exploration and evaluation asset was assessed. The asset’s recoverable amount was calculated applying a fair value
of $18 per ounce of gold in the ground, which was provided by a valuation analysis of an independent report on similar African
exploration companies, to the Ngayu project’s Makapela mineral resource. Since the carrying value of the asset was determined
to be higher than its recoverable amount, an impairment loss of $25,801,443 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013.
Exploration to date at North Kivu have not advanced to the stage of being able to identify the quantity of possible resources available
for potential mining. No impairment loss was recorded during 2012 or 2011.



Gain on derivative
financial instruments

The Company’s outstanding
Canadian dollar denominated common share warrants expired as at December 31, 2012, and accordingly no gain or loss was recorded
during the year ended December 31, 2013. A fair value adjustment gain of $768,264 was recorded for fiscal 2012, compared to a gain
on derivative financial instruments of $5,215,060 recorded during fiscal 2011. The significant decrease was due to the change in
the fair market value of the Company’s then outstanding Canadian dollar denominated common share purchase warrants classified
as derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of financial position and also the number of outstanding common share
purchase warrants as they expired throughout 2012.



Foreign exchange
loss

The Company recorded a foreign
exchange loss of $252,111 during fiscal 2013, compared to a foreign exchange loss of $185,099 recorded during fiscal 2012 and a
foreign exchange loss of $1,896 in fiscal 2011, due to fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to the Canadian
dollar.



Compensation expense-share-based
payment

The fair value of employee share-based
payment expenses recorded during 2013 decreased to $259,559 from $484,897 and $1,671,475 recorded during 2012 and 2011, respectively.
This decrease is the result of fewer share-based compensation options issued to employees, directors and officers of the Company
vesting in the period.



Summary of Quarterly Results



The following table sets out certain unaudited
consolidated financial information of the Company for each of the quarters of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012. This financial information
has been prepared using accounting policies consistent with International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) 34 Interim
Financial Reporting issued by the IASB. The Company’s presentation and functional currency is the United States dollar.



8







|                   |  | 2013        |            |   | 2013        |   |             | 2013        |  |   | 2013        |  
|------------------ |  | ----------- | ---------- | - | ----------- | - | ----------- | ----------- |  | - | ----------- | -
|                   |  | 4th Quarter |            |   | 3rd Quarter |   |             | 2nd Quarter |  |   | 1st Quarter |  
|                   |  |             |            |   |             |   |             |             |  |   |             |  
|Net loss           |  | $           | (7,577,624 | ) |             | $ | (18,237,714 | )           |  | $ | (639,939    | )
|Net loss per share |  | $           | (0.10      | ) |             | $ | (0.25       | )           |  | $ | (0.01       | )



|                   |  |             |         
|------------------ |  | ----------- | --------
|                   |  | 2012        |         
|                   |  | 4th Quarter |         
|                   |  |             |         
|Net loss           |  | $           | (861,755
|Net loss per share |  | $           | (0.01   



The Company’s net loss for the fourth
quarter of 2013 decreased to $7,577,624 compared to a net loss of $18,237,714 in the third quarter of 2013 due to a larger impairment
write down that was recognized in the third quarter of 2013 (the impairment in the fourth quarter was $7,904,292 compared to an
impairment in the third quarter of $17,861,151). The Company’s net loss for the third quarter of 2013 increased to $18,237,714
compared to a net loss of $639,939 recorded in the second quarter of 2013. The significant increase is mainly attributed to the
impairment write down of the Ngayu project of $17,861,151. As well, during the third quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter
of 2013, there was a decrease in foreign exchange loss of $120,826, a reduction in office expenses of $74,218 and a decrease in
consulting, management and professional fees of $33,162. The Company’s net loss for the second quarter of 2013 decreased
to $639,939 compared to a net loss of $769,174 recorded in the first quarter of 2013. The decline is mainly attributed to the fluctuation
in the foreign exchange rate resulting in a decreased foreign exchange loss of $99,971 and a decrease in consulting, management
and professional fees of $46,584. The Company’s net loss for the first quarter of 2013 decreased to $769,174 compared to
a net loss of $861,755 recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012. The decline is mainly attributed to the fluctuation in the foreign
exchange rate resulting in a net decrease of $51,930 and a decrease in consulting, management and professional fees of $50,381.
The Company’s net loss for the fourth quarter of 2012 increased to $861,755 from a net loss of $500,373 recorded in the third
quarter of 2012. This net loss was most significantly impacted by a $241,416 foreign exchange loss during the fourth quarter of
2012 compared to a $104,038 foreign exchange gain during the third quarter of 2012. The Company’s net loss for the third
quarter of 2012 decreased to $500,373 from a net loss of $706,353 recorded in the second quarter of 2012. This net loss was most
significantly impacted by a $104,038 foreign exchange gain during the third quarter of 2012 compared to a $165,968 foreign exchange
loss during the second quarter of 2012, as well as the decrease in the gain on derivative financial instruments of $9,813 in the
third quarter of 2012 compared to $150,585 in the second quarter of 2012. A decrease in the stock based compensation expense from
$73,972 in the third quarter of 2012 compared to $149,132 in the second quarter of 2012 also contributed in the decrease of the
net loss during the third quarter of 2012. The Company’s net loss for the second quarter of 2012 increased to $706,353 from
$13,342 in the first quarter of 2012. This was most significantly impacted by a $165,968 foreign exchange loss during the second
quarter of 2012 compared to a $118,247 foreign exchange gain during the first quarter of 2012 and a decrease in the gain on derivative
financial instruments from $150,585 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $607,866 in the first quarter of 2012.



9







Liquidity and Capital Resources



The Company historically relies primarily
on equity financings to fund its activities. Although the Company has been successful in completing equity financings in the past,
there is no assurance that the Company will secure the necessary financings in the future.



As at December 31, 2013, the Company had
cash and cash equivalents of $324,928 and working capital deficit of $359,279 compared to cash and cash equivalents of $10,741,699
and working capital of $9,594,825 as at December 31, 2012.



During fiscal 2013, the Company incurred
cash exploration expenditures of $8,454,857 (2012 - $16,963,931). A breakdown of all exploration expenditures by project for fiscal
2013 and fiscal 2012 is presented below under “Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures”.



The Company has strategically reduced budgets
significantly and implemented cost cutting measures having regard to current market conditions and its low cash position and working
capital deficiency. As is typical for an exploration company, the Company will need to raise additional funds to continue its exploration
program. The Company expects to raise such additional funds through offerings of its shares. However, if the Company raises
additional funds by issuing additional shares, the ownership percentages of existing shareholders will be reduced and the securities
that the Company may issue in the future may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current holders of the
Company’s common shares. Such securities may also be issued at a discount to the market price of the Company’s common
shares, resulting in possible further dilution to the book value per share of common shares. If the Company is unable to raise
sufficient funds through equity offerings, it may need to sell an interest in its properties. There can be no assurance the
Company would be successful in selling any such interest.



Contractual Obligations



The Company has entered into leases for
buildings with renewal terms whereby the lease agreements can be extended based on market prices at the time of renewal. There
are no restrictions placed upon the lessee by entering into these leases.



The Company's future minimum operating
lease commitments as at December 31, 2013 are as follows:



|Contractual Obligations     |  | Total |         |  | One year |   |        | Two to three years |  |   | Four to five years |  |  | After five years |  
|--------------------------- |  | ----- | ------- |  | -------- | - | ------ | ------------------ |  | - | ------------------ |  |  | ---------------- | -
|                            |  |       |         |  |          |   |        |                    |  |   |                    |  |  |                  |  
|Operating Lease Obligations |  | $     | 126,018 |  |          | $ | 75,611 |                    |  | $ | 50,407             |  |  |                  | -
|Total                       |  | $     | 126,018 |  |          | $ | 75,611 |                    |  | $ | 50,407             |  |  |                  | -





10











Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures



The following table provides a breakdown
of the Company's exploration and evaluation expenditures incurred during fiscal 2013:



|                                 |  | North Kivu Project |           |   | Ngayu Project |   |             | Total | 
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | --------- | - | ------------- | - | ----------- | ----- | 
|Balance 12/31/2012               |  | $                  | 9,400,822 |   |               | $ | 38,854,379  |       | 
|                                 |  |                    |           |   |               |   |             |       | 
|Field camps expenses             |  |                    | 15,592    |   |               |   | 852,972     |       | 
|Geophysics                       |  |                    | -         |   |               |   | 34,055      |       | 
|Geochemistry                     |  |                    | 973       |   |               |   | 281,697     |       | 
|Geology                          |  |                    | 56        |   |               |   | 47,710      |       | 
|Drilling                         |  |                    | -         |   |               |   | 557,555     |       | 
|Feasibility studies              |  |                    | -         |   |               |   | 388,684     |       | 
|Helicopter                       |  |                    | -         |   |               |   | 680,445     |       | 
|Professional fees                |  |                    | 16,300    |   |               |   | 21,368      |       | 
|Business promotion               |  |                    | 5,627     |   |               |   | 135,400     |       | 
|Travel                           |  |                    | 64,926    |   |               |   | 406,990     |       | 
|Office and sundry                |  |                    | 66,840    |   |               |   | 568,258     |       | 
|Interest and bank charges        |  |                    | 11,910    |   |               |   | 50,293      |       | 
|Consulting fees                  |  |                    | 92,205    |   |               |   | 22,177      |       | 
|Salaries                         |  |                    | 184,802   |   |               |   | 2,905,677   |       | 
|Stock based compensation         |  |                    | -         |   |               |   | 155,034     |       | 
|Amortization                     |  |                    | 50,715    |   |               |   | 290,765     |       | 
|Loss(Gain) on disposal of assets |  |                    | (94       | ) |               |   | (1,143      | )     | 
|Other                            |  |                    | 25,528    |   |               |   | 506,383     |       | 
|Expenditures for the period      |  |                    | 535,380   |   |               |   | 7,904,320   |       | 
|Impairment Loss                  |  |                    | -         |   |               |   | (25,801,443 | )     | 
|Balance 12/31/2013               |  | $                  | 9,936,202 |   |               | $ | 20,957,256  |       | 



The following table provides a breakdown
of the Company's exploration and evaluation expenditures incurred during fiscal 2012:



|                           |  | North Kivu Project |           |  | Ngayu Project |   |            | Total | 
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------ | --------- |  | ------------- | - | ---------- | ----- | 
|Balance 12/31/2011         |  | $                  | 7,596,710 |  |               | $ | 22,493,653 |       | 
|                           |  |                    |           |  |               |   |            |       | 
|Mineral rights             |  |                    | -         |  |               |   | -          |       | 
|Field camps expenses       |  |                    | 215,284   |  |               |   | 2,069,623  |       | 
|Geophysics                 |  |                    | -         |  |               |   | 135,846    |       | 
|Geochemistry               |  |                    | 54,734    |  |               |   | 612,745    |       | 
|Geology                    |  |                    | 15,946    |  |               |   | 156,678    |       | 
|Drilling                   |  |                    | -         |  |               |   | 3,827,695  |       | 
|Remote and sensing         |  |                    | -         |  |               |   | -          |       | 
|Feasibility studies        |  |                    | -         |  |               |   | 77,263     |       | 
|Helicopter                 |  |                    | 6,832     |  |               |   | 2,438,707  |       | 
|Professional fees          |  |                    | 72,807    |  |               |   | 85,063     |       | 
|Business promotion         |  |                    | 27,279    |  |               |   | 283,378    |       | 
|Travel                     |  |                    | 172,850   |  |               |   | 698,960    |       | 
|Office and sundry          |  |                    | 475,218   |  |               |   | 523,299    |       | 
|Interest and bank charges  |  |                    | 34,846    |  |               |   | 71,730     |       | 
|Consulting fees            |  |                    | 134,071   |  |               |   | 53,418     |       | 
|Salaries                   |  |                    | 373,346   |  |               |   | 3,888,274  |       | 
|Stock based compensation   |  |                    | -         |  |               |   | 184,084    |       | 
|Amortization               |  |                    | 51,468    |  |               |   | 247,736    |       | 
|Loss on disposal of assets |  |                    | 2,803     |  |               |   | 24,532     |       | 
|Other                      |  |                    | 166,628   |  |               |   | 981,695    |       | 
|Expenditures for the year  |  |                    | 1,804,112 |  |               |   | 16,360,726 |       | 
|Balance 12/31/2012         |  | $                  | 9,400,822 |  |               | $ | 38,854,379 |       | 



11







Outstanding Share Data



The authorized share capital of the Company
consists of an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of preference shares, issuable in series. As at March
31, 2014, the Company had outstanding 73,439,732 common shares and 5,355,000 stock options to purchase common shares.



Related Party Transactions



| | a) | Key Management Personnel
| | -- | ------------------------



The Company’s related
parties include key management. Key management includes directors (executive and non-executive), the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”),
the Chief Financial Officer, and the senior executives reporting directly to the CEO. The remuneration of the key management of
the Company as defined above, during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 was follows:



|                                          |  | Year ended
December 31, 
2013 |           |  | Year ended
December 31,
2012 |   |           | Year ended
December 31,
2011 | 
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | --------- |  | ---------------------------- | - | --------- | ---------------------------- | 
|Salaries                                  |  | $                             | 830,345   |  |                              | $ | 946,379   |                              | 
|Employee retention allowance              |  | $                             | 62,305    |  |                              | $ | 59,014    |                              | 
|Compensation expense-share-based payments |  | $                             | 226,110   |  |                              | $ | 317,407   |                              | 
|                                          |  | $                             | 1,118,760 |  |                              | $ | 1,322,800 |                              | 





12







| | b) | Other Related Parties
| | -- | ---------------------



As at December 31, 2013, an amount of $41,946
was due from Banro Corporation (“Banro”) and Delrand Resources Limited (“Delrand”), companies
with common directors, related to common expenses in the DRC (December 31, 2012 - $17,760).



As at December 31, 2013 an amount of $5,088
was due to Banro related to common expenses in the DRC (December 31, 2012 - $nil)



|                         |  | December 31,
2013 |        |  | December 31,
2012 | 
|------------------------ |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | ----------------- | 
|                         |  | $                 |        |  | $                 | 
|Due from related parties |  |                   | 41,946 |  |                   | 
|Due to related party     |  |                   | 5,088  |  |                   | 



The amounts included in the due from/to
related party are non-interest bearing and are payable within 12 months



Included in the balance of $388,763
for advances receivable in the statement of financial position is an amount of $126,648 due from Banro, for the sale of IP
equipment.



Newly Applied Accounting Standards



The Company has applied the following new
and revised IFRSs in the Annual Financial Statements: IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements, IFRS 12 Disclosure of interests
in other entities, IFRS 13 fair value measurements, IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements, IAS 19 Employee benefits, and IAS
27 Separate financial statements.



Accounting Standards Issued But Not
Yet Effective



The Company has reviewed
new and revised accounting pronouncements that have been issued but are not yet effective and determined that the following may
have an impact on the Company:



IFRS 9 Financial instruments
(“IFRS 9”) was issued by the IASB on November 12, 2009 and will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition
and Measurement (“IAS 39”). IFRS 9 replaces the multiple rules in IAS 39 with a single approach to determine
whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value and a new mixed measurement model for debt instruments having
only two categories: amortized cost and fair value. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments
in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. The new standard also
requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. The effective date of IFRS
9 has yet to be determined. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of IFRS 9 on its consolidated financial statements.



An amendment to IAS 32,
Financial Instruments: presentation (“IAS 32”) was issued by the IASB in December 2011. The amendment clarifies
the meaning of ‘currently has a legally enforceable right to set-off’. The amendments to IAS 32 are effective for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The Company does not expect the standard to have a material impact its consolidated
financial statements.



13







An amendment to IAS 36,
Impairment of Assets (“IAS 36”) was issued by the IASB in May 2013. The amendment reduces the circumstances
in which the recoverable amount of assets or cash-generating units is required to be disclosed, clarifies the disclosures required,
and 13 introduces an explicit requirement to disclose the discount rate used in determining impairment. The amendments to IAS 36
are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of IAS 36
on its consolidated financial statements.



In May 2013, IFRS Interpretation
Committee (“IFRIC”) published IFRIC Interpretation 21, Levies (“IFRIC 21”), effective for
annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. IFRIC 21 provides guidance on when to recognize a liability for a levy imposed
by a government. IFRIC 21 identifies the obligating event for the recognition of a liability as the activity that triggers the
payment of the levy in accordance with the relevant legislation. The Company does not expect the standard to have a material impact
on its consolidated financial statements.



Critical Accounting Estimates



The preparation of the Company’s
consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that
affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results
may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Information about critical
judgments in applying accounting policies and estimates that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the
consolidated financial statements included the following:



Estimates:



Impairment



Assets, including property, plant and equipment
and exploration and evaluation assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their
carrying amounts exceed their recoverable amounts. The assessment of the fair value often requires estimates and assumptions such
as discount rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, rehabilitation and restoration costs, future capital requirements and future
operating performance. Changes in such estimates could impact recoverable values of these assets. Estimates are reviewed regularly
by management.



Share-based payment transactions



The Company measures the cost of equity-settled
transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. Estimating
fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determining the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent on
the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model
including the expected life of the stock option, volatility and dividend yield and making assumptions about them. Under IFRS, the
Company is required to estimate the number of forfeitures likely to occur on grant date and reflect this in the share-based payment
expense revising for actual experiences in subsequent periods.



14







The fair value at grant date is determined
using a Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution,
the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free
interest rate for the term of the option.



The model inputs for options granted during
the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 included the following (no options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2013):



|Years ended                  |  | December 31, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012 |  | December 31, 2011
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------
|Risk free interest rate      |  | -                 |  | 1.00% - 1.16%     |  | 1.83% - 2.18%    
|Expected life                |  | -                 |  | 3 years           |  | 3 years          
|Annualized volatility        |  | -                 |  | 68.02% - 104.54%  |  | 101.78% - 115.19%
|Dividend yield               |  | -                 |  | 0%                |  | 0%               
|Forfeiture rate              |  | -                 |  | 2%                |  | 2%               
|Grant date fair value (Cdn$) |  | -                 |  | $0.32 - $1.14     |  | $1.69 - $2.06    



Exploration and evaluation expenditure



The application of the Company’s
accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires judgment in determining whether it is likely that future
economic benefits will flow to the Company, which may be based on assumptions about future events or circumstances. Estimates and
assumptions made may change if new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available
suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, the amount capitalized is written off in the statement of comprehensive
income (loss) during the period the new information becomes available.



Judgments:



Provisions and contingencies



The amount recognized as provision, including
legal, contractual and other exposures or obligations, is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the related
liability, including any related interest charges, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation.
In addition, contingencies will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Therefore, assessment of
contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgment and estimates of the outcome of future events. The Company
assesses its liabilities and contingencies based upon the best information available, relevant tax laws and other appropriate requirements.



Income taxes



The Company is subject to income taxes
in various jurisdictions and subject to various rates and rules of taxation. Significant judgment is required in determining the
provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations undertaken during the ordinary course of business for
which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on
the Company’s current understanding of the tax law. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts
that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the current and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such
determination is made.



15







In addition, the Company has recognized
deferred tax assets relating to tax losses carried forward to the extent there is sufficient taxable income relating to the same
taxation authority and the same subsidiary against which the unused tax losses can be utilized. However, future realization of
the tax losses also depends on the ability of the entity to satisfy certain tests at the time the losses are recouped, including
current and future economic conditions, production rates and production costs.



Title to Mineral Property Interests



Although the Company has taken steps to
verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such
properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.



Financial Risk Management



Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities



The consolidated
statements of financial position carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, advances receivable, balances due from/to related
parties, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and the employee retention allowance approximate fair value due to their short-term
nature. Due to the use of subjective judgments and uncertainties in the determination of fair values these values should not be
interpreted as being realizable in an immediate settlement of the financial instruments.



Fair value hierarchy



The following table provides
an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to
3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:



| | · | Level 1 fair value measurements are those
derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Level 2 fair value measurements are those
derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
(i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices);
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Level 3 fair value measurements are those
derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable
inputs).
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



There
were no transfers between Level 1, 2 and 3 during the reporting period. The fair values of financial assets and liabilities carried
at amortized cost are approximated by their carrying values. Cash and cash equivalents are ranked Level 1 as the market value is
readily observable. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value, as maturities are less than three
months.



16







Foreign Currency Risk



Foreign
exchange risk is the risk that a variation in exchange rates between the United States dollar and Canadian dollar or other foreign
currencies will affect the Company’s operations and financial results. A portion of the Company’s transactions is denominated
in Canadian dollars. Significant foreign exchange gains or losses are reflected as a separate component of the consolidated statement
of comprehensive income (loss). The Company does not use derivatives instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.
See Note 15(c) of the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.



Credit Risk



Financial
instruments which are potentially subject to credit risk for the Company consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, advances
receivable and due from related parties. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with several financial institutions of reputable
credit and may be redeemed upon demand. It is therefore the Company’s opinion that such credit risk is subject to normal
industry risks and is considered minimal. See Note 15(d) of the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.



Liquidity Risk



Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company
will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company attempts to ensure that there is sufficient
cash to meet its liabilities when they are due and manages this risk by regularly evaluating its liquid financial resources to
fund current and long-term obligations and to meet its capital commitments in a cost-effective manner. If future cash flows are
fairly uncertain, the liquidity risk increases. The Company’s liquidity requirements are met through a variety of sources,
including cash and cash equivalents, and equity capital markets.



Mineral Property Risk



The Company’s operations in the DRC
are exposed to various levels of political risk and uncertainties, including political and economic instability, government regulations
relating to exploration and mining, military repression and civil disorder, all or any of which may have a material adverse impact
on the Company’s activities or may result in impairment or loss of part or all of the Company's assets.



Risks and Uncertainties



The Company is subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties that could significantly impact its operations and future prospects. The following discussion pertains to certain
principal risks and uncertainties but is not, by its nature, all inclusive.



17







All of the Company's projects are located
in the DRC. The assets and operations of the Company are therefore subject to various political, economic and other uncertainties,
including, among other things, the risks of war and civil unrest, hostage taking, military repression, labor unrest, illegal mining,
expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation or nullification of existing licenses, permits, approvals and contracts, taxation
policies, foreign exchange and repatriation restrictions, changing political conditions, international monetary fluctuations, currency
controls and foreign governmental regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign
contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Changes, if any, in mining or investment
policies or shifts in political attitude in the DRC may adversely affect the Company's operations. Operations may be affected in
varying degrees by government regulations with respect to, but not limited to, restrictions on production, price controls, export
controls, currency remittance, income taxes, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land
claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices
relating to mineral rights could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements. In addition, in the event of a dispute
arising from operations in the DRC, the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful
in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts in Canada. The Company also may be hindered or prevented from enforcing
its rights with respect to a governmental instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. It is not possible for
the Company to accurately predict such developments or changes in laws or policy or to what extent any such developments or changes
may have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations.



The DRC is a developing nation emerging
from a period of civil war and conflict. Physical and institutional infrastructure throughout the DRC is in a debilitated condition.
The DRC is in transition from a largely state controlled economy to one based on free market principles, and from a non-democratic
political system with a centralized ethnic power base, to one based on more democratic principles. There can be no assurance that
these changes will be effected or that the achievement of these objectives will not have material adverse consequences for the
Company and its operations. The DRC continues to experience instability in parts of the country due to certain militia and criminal
elements. While the government and United Nations forces are working to support the extension of central government authority throughout
the country, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful.



The only sources of future funds for further
exploration programs which are presently available to the Company are the sale of equity capital, or the offering by the Company
of an interest in its properties to be earned by another party carrying out further exploration. There is no assurance that such
sources of financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. In the event that commercial quantities of minerals are
found on the Company's properties, the Company does not have the financial resources at this time to bring a mine into production.



All of the Company's properties are in
the exploration stage only and none of the properties contain a known body of commercial ore. The Company currently operates at
a loss and does not generate any revenue from its mineral properties. The exploration and development of mineral deposits involve
significant financial risks over a significant period of time, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge
may not eliminate. Few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenditures may be required
to establish reserves by drilling and to construct mining and processing facilities at a site. It is impossible to ensure that
the Company's exploration programs will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.



The Company's mineral resources are estimates
and no assurances can be given that the indicated levels of gold will be produced. Such estimates are expressions of judgment based
on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may
significantly change when new information becomes available. While the Company believes that its resource estimates are well established,
by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend, to a certain extent, upon statistical inferences, which may ultimately
prove unreliable. If such estimates are inaccurate or are reduced in the future, this could have a material adverse impact on the
Company. In addition, there can be no assurance that gold recoveries or other metal recoveries in small-scale laboratory tests
will be duplicated in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production.



18







The Company's exploration and, if such
exploration is successful, development of its properties is subject to all of the hazards and risks normally incident to mineral
exploration and development, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability
for any or all damage.



The price of gold has fluctuated widely.
The future direction of the price of gold will depend on numerous factors beyond the Company's control including international,
economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global or regional consumption
patterns, speculative activities and increased production due to new extraction developments and improved extraction and production
methods. The effect of these factors on the price of gold, and therefore on the economic viability of the Company's properties,
cannot accurately be predicted. As the Company is only at the exploration stage, it is not yet possible for the Company to adopt
specific strategies for controlling the impact of fluctuations in the price of gold.



The Company uses the United States dollar
as its functional currency. Fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to the Canadian dollar could have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements by creating gains or losses. During fiscal 2013 and 2012,
the Company recorded a foreign exchange loss of $252,111 and $185,099, respectively, due to the variation in the value of the United
States dollar relative to the Canadian dollar. No currency hedge policies are in place or are presently contemplated.



The natural resource industry is intensely
competitive in all of its phases, and the Company competes with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical
facilities than itself.



Reference is made to the Company's annual
report on Form 20-F dated March 31, 2014 for additional risk factor disclosure (a copy of such document can be obtained from SEDAR
at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov).



Disclosure Controls and Procedures



Management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal controls over disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification
of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filingsof the Canadian Securities Administrators and Rules 13a-15(e) and
Rule 15d-15(e) under the United States Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that all relevant information is gathered and reported to senior management, including the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding public
disclosure. As at December 31, 2013, management of the Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as required by Canadian
securities laws. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as
of December 31, 2013, the disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed and effective in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed by the Company it files or submits under Canadian securities laws is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by those laws and that material information is accumulated and communicated to management
of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.



19







Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



Internal controls have been designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. As at December 31, 2013, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer evaluated or caused to be evaluated under their supervision the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on that evaluation,
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Company’s
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS.



The Company is required under Canadian
securities laws to disclose herein any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the Company’s most recent interim period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting during the year ended December 31, 2013, that management believes have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.



It should be noted that a control system,
including the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures system and internal control over financial reporting system, no
matter how well conceived can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objective of the control system will
be met and it should not be expected that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures system and internal control over
financial reporting will prevent or detect all reporting deficiencies whether caused by either error or fraud.



20