alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
abwn_ex105.htm

EXHIBIT 10.5

 


	
 
	
December 29, 2017




 

Adar Bays, LLC

3411 Indian Creek Drive, Suite 403, 

Miami Beach, FL 33140

Re: Confirmation of conversion price and prepay increases

 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

 

This letter is being written with respect to those certain 8% Convertible Promissory Notes in the aggregate amount of $555,000.00 dated September 25, 2017 (the “Notes”) issued to Adar Bays, LLC (the “Investor”) by Airborne Wireless Network., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”).

 

Please note that the Company confirms that, per the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement entered between the Company and the Investor as of September 25, 2017 and the Notes, the Conversion Price (as that term is defined in each Note) sshall be 55% (resulting in an effective conversion discount of 45% instead of 30%). In addition, the prepayment amounts set forth section 4(c) of each Note are increased by 10% each (by way of example, 115% prepay premium becomes 125% prepay premium).

 

In addition, please note that each Note issued by us to you may be converted at any time, subject to full cash payment for that Note.

 

Please keep this letter on file

 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

AIRBORNE WIRELESS NETWORK

 


	
By:
	
/s/ J. Edward Daniels
	
 




 

President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59668-59672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29065]



[[Page 59668]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 98-03]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

Agency: Defense Security Assistance Agency, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated, July 
21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 98-03, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification and sensitivity of technology pages.

    Dated: October 29, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 59669]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO97.006



[[Page 59670]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO97.007



[[Page 59671]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO97.008



[[Page 59672]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO97.009



[FR Doc. 97-29065 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          60,359
<SECURITIES>                                     5,888
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,728
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,428
<PP&E>                                         164,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 429,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,890
<BONDS>                                         10,442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,856
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   429,863
<SALES>                                        156,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               162,415
<CGS>                                          126,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128715 (28) Michael F. Cavanagh 

128283 (46) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JOHN R. JACOBS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 128715 

 COA: 258271 

Oakland CC: 91-405664-NO 

TECHNIDISC, INC., and PRODUCER’S 

COLOR SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE
 

COMPANY n/k/a AMERISURE MUTUAL
 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Intervenor-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

MARCIA VAN TIL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 128283 

 COA: 250539 

Ottawa CC: 02-042717-NO 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 

MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On November 3, 2005, we granted leave to appeal in these cases and ordered that 

they be argued and submitted to the Court together. 474 Mich 913, 914 (2005). The 

Director of the Workers’ Compensation Agency has now filed motions to intervene, to 

file a brief, and for oral argument. By order of the Court, the motions are treated as 

motions to participate as amicus curiae, and they are GRANTED. The Director is invited 

to file a brief amicus curiae and to present a fifteen minute oral argument at the 

conclusion of the oral arguments of the parties in these cases. 

t0328 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 31, 2006 

Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00362-CV

Steve NUNEZ,

Appellant

v.

Alma Idalia NUNEZ,

Appellee

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 34916

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 28 and June 29, 2022, we ordered appellant to provide written proofs to this 

court within ten days of the date of the orders that he had paid the reporters’ fees or was entitled 

to appeal without paying the reporters’ fees. We further ordered that, if appellant failed to 

respond to our orders, his brief would be due within thirty days of the date of the orders and we 

would consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a 

reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Because appellant did not timely 

respond and did not file a brief within thirty days of the orders, we ordered appellant to file his 

brief and a response regarding his untimely brief.

On August 10, 2022, court reporter Lisa A. Traslavina filed two volumes of the reporter’s 

record. On that same date, court reporter Melinda M. Walker filed a notification of late record, 

requesting until August 16, 2022 to file the record. Walker’s notification is NOTED.

On August 12, 2022, appellant filed a response to our orders and a motion for extension 

of time to file proof of payment of the reporters’ fees and to file his brief. Appellant’s motion is 

GRANTED. Appellant’s proof of payment of the reporters’ fees is deemed timely filed. We 

will consider the reporter’s record in this appeal. It is ORDERED that appellant’s brief is due 

within thirty days of the date the complete reporter’s record is filed with this court.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 The undersigned, Garrett Sullivan, the Chief Financial Officer of
Cognitronics Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Company.


DATED this 14th day of May 2004.

/s/ Garrett Sullivan
-------------------
Garrett Sullivan

Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Amendment 1 to the annual report of XT Energy Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended July 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
we, Zhou Deng Hua, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Yanhong Xue, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:
January
    7, 2020 | /s/
    Zhou Deng Hua        
|------------------------- | -----------------------------
|                          | Zhou Deng Hua                
|                          | Chief Executive Officer      
|                          | (Principal Executive Officer)



|Date:
January
    7, 2020 | /s/
    Yanhong Xue                                                
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Yanhong Xue                                                        
|                          | Chief Financial Officer                                            
|                          | (Principal Financial Officer and
 Principal Accounting
    Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1530** 

TODD WILLIAM BACHELDOR , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS; EDWIN D. HILL; ROBERT P. KLEIN; LINDSAY K. NELSON; NEAL HARRISON ; WHITE ELECTRIC; RODGER BUILDERS, INC. , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 7:10

- cv
- 00228

- BO )

Submitted : October 1 8 , 2011 Decided: October 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Todd William Bacheldor, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Louise Bor, SHERMAN DUNN COHEN LEIFER & YELLIG, PC, Washington, DC ; Sarah M. Stephens, FOLTZ MARTIN, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, Kelly Suzanne Hughes, Homer Bernard Tisdale, III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cir cuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Todd William Bacheldor appeals the district court ’ s
order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Bacheldor v. Int’l B h d.

of Elec. Workers , No. 7:10

- cv
- 00228

- BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2011)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFI RMED
NO. 07-10-00444-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 28, 2010

HENRY CASTILLO, JR., APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 60,609-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., a nd CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the motion of appellant Henry Castillo, Jr. to dismiss

his appeal. Appellant and his attorney signed the motion. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No

decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly,

the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate

will issue forthwith.

James T. Campbell

Justice

Do not publish.
#### DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, sub nomine its Department of Hospitals operating Jackson Memorial Hospital, Appellant, v. Elaine H. CANN, and Lena C. Pere, Appellees.

No. 69-695.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third Disrtict.

Sept. 22, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

**Waterfowl Identification in the Central Flyway**

##       Tundra Swan (Whistler)    

----

****

**Body:** Very large bird, 11-20 pounds, 48-57 inches long.     Adult entirely snow white; immature grayish white. Primaries whitish as opposed     to black primaries on Snow Goose. Adult feet and bill black with yellow spot     on bill in front of eye; immature, dull pinkish feet and bill, and bill lacks     yellow spot. **Voice:** Loud, musical and varied *wow-wow-ou*     and *who-who.***In Flight:** Very long white neck and     body. Black bill and feet evident.   

****

----

Previous Section
Return to Contents
Next Section

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/waterfwl/tundra.htm		Page Contact Information: Webmaster		Page Last Modified: Thursday, 03-Aug-2006 11:32:16 EDT		Reston, VA [vaww54]
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Powin Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.     Dated:  March 18, 2011 By: /s/ Joseph Lu Joseph Lu Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)   Dated:  March 18, 2011 By: /s/ Ron Horne Ron Horne Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
STEPHEN J. BECKER, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Plaintiff, 

V. Civil Action No. 

SHELITA N. PARHAM, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

APR 3 0 2012 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

12 0680 

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the plaintiffs application to proceed 

in forma pauperis and his prose "Notice of Removal," which is construed as a Complaint. The 

application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. 

On the defendant's petition, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued a civil 

protection order against the plaintiff. See Compl. (unnumbered cover page); see id., Ex. 

(Petition and Affidavit for Civil Protection Order, Parham v. Becker, No. 2011 CPO 184 (D.C. 

Super. Ct. filed Jan. 18, 2011)). A hearing on the extension of the civil protection order was to 

be held on February 6, 2012 at which the plaintiff intended to represent himself without the 

assistance of counsel. 1 Id. According to the plaintiff, he "could not be heard during the hearing 

because of [the presiding judge's] emotional outburst, rants, and constant threats of contempt of 

court with jail time for failing to accept counsel." Id. at 1. The plaintiff has concluded that the 

he "can't be heard in the Superior Court," and thus is denied "the right of due process." Id. at 7. 

He demands that this matter be removed to federal court, that the civil protection order be 

vacated, and that "a Prohibitory Injunction Order [be] issued against the Defendant." Id. at 8. 

The plaintiff also was to be arraigned on a charge of criminal contempt. See Compl., Ex. 

(Transcript of proceedings on February 6, 2012) at 9:12-14, 22:24-23:7. 
protection order be vacated, and that "a Prohibitory Injunction Order [be] issued against the 

Defendant." !d. at 8. 

Notwithstanding the plaintiffs characterization of his pleading as a notice for removal, in 

essence, the plaintiff asks this Court to review and reverse the decision of a Superior Court 

judge. This Court has no such jurisdiction, and declines to intervene in a matter pending before 

the Superior Court. See, e.g., Mooreman v. US. Bank, NA., No. 10-1219, 2010 WL 2884661, at 

*1 (D.D.C. July 10, 2010); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), aff'd, 

1994 WL 474995 (D.C. Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1150 (1995). 

Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. 

DATE: t1p.J ~ ~ J.u/2.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29185]



[[Page 59852]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Defense Panel Meeting

AGENCY: DoD, National Defense Panel.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
meeting of the National Defense Panel on November 13 and 14, 1997. In 
accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App. II, (1982)], it has been 
determined that this National Defense Panel meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public from 0900-1700, November 13 and 14, 1997 
in order for the Panel to discuss classified material.

DATES: November 13 and 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Suite 532, 1931 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington VA.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Defense Panel was established 
on January 14, 1997 in accordance with the Military Force Structure 
Review Act of 1996, Public Law 104-201. The mission of the National 
Defense Panel is to provide the Secretary of Defense and Congress with 
an independent, non-partisan assessment of the Secretary's Quadrennial 
Defense Review and an Alternative Force Structure Analysis. This 
analysis will explore innovative ways to meet the national security 
challenges of the twenty-first century.

Proposed Schedule and Agenda

    The National Defense Panel will meet in closed session from 0900-
1700 on November 13 and 14. During the closed session on November 13th 
from 0900-1700 the NDP staff will present the Panel with status updates 
on Counterproliferation, WMD Deterrence, and Humint at the Crystal Mall 
3 office. On November 14th from 0900 to 1700 the NDP will hear staff 
presentations on Nuclear Policy, Issue Brief on Industrial Base and the 
Rollout Update at the Crystal Mall 3 office.
    The determination to close the meeting is based on the 
consideration that it is expected that discussion will involve 
classified matters of national security concern throughout.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Please contact the National Defense Panel at 
(703) 602-4176/6.

    Dated: October 30, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-29185 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
### EPA Form 5900-06 OMB No. 2060-0336, Approval Expires 06/30/2015 

### Federal Operating Permit Pr ogram (40 CFR Part 71)

FEE FILING FORM (FF)

Complete this form each time you prepare form FEE and send this form to the appropriate lockbox bank

address, along with full payment. This form required at time of initial fee payment, and thereafter, when

paying annual fees.

Source or Facility Name_ Anadarko Petroleum Corpor ation – Blackhornet EGOM Exploratory Project

Source Location Refer to Section 1.1 of the attached application.

EPA Region where Source Located 4

Mailing Address:

Street/P.O. Box __1201 Lake Robbins Drive City___ The Woodlands

State __TX____ ZIP _77380_ - ______

Contact Person: Kathryn Maness Title _Sr. Staff EHS Representative

Telephone (832) 636 – 2582 Ext. __________

Total Fee Payment Remitted : $ 58,558
Exhibit  23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-170718) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, as amended and the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan of Accretive Health, Inc. of our reports dated February 29, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Accretive Health, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Accretive Health, Inc.,  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2011.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Chicago, Illinois


February 29, 2012