alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, November 24, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Proposals regarding the schematic design and costs of a Federal 
Reserve Bank's new building project.
    2. Federal Reserve Bank and Branch director appointments.
    3. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    4. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: November 14, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-30429 Filed 11-14-97; 3:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**DWS Short Duration Fund**

**A Series of DWS Investments Trust**

Investment Company Act file number  811-08006

DWS Investments Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  10/31

Date of reporting period:  *7/1/08-6/30/09

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 
```

*    DWS Short Duration Fund, a series of DWS Investments Trust was reorganized
     into DWS Short Duration Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds on 8/21/06. The
     surviving fund's Form N-PX will be filed on approximately 8/28/09. (CIK:
     797657) (Filing no. 811-04760).

******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-08006
Reporting Period: 07/01/2008 - 06/30/2009
DWS Investments Trust

========================= E    DWS SHORT DURATION FUND =========================
========== END NPX REPORT
```

 

----
16.1

Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local No. 7 Pension Plan

Checklist Item #16

Does the application describe the steps the plan sponsor has taken to ensure that notices delivered 

electronically are reasonably accessible to the recipients? See section 4.05(3).

Document 16.1 provides a brief description of the steps taken to ensure that notices delivered 

electronically are reasonably accessible to the eligible recipients.
16.2

4.05(3) Steps Taken to Ensure that Electronically Delivered Notices Are Reasonably 

Accessible to Recipients

Document 16.1

The Pension Plan’s Efforts to Ensure that

Electronically Delivered Notices Are Reasonably Accessible to Eligible Recipients

The Pension Plan is a multiemployer plan covering workers in the bricklaying industry. As 

such, the eligible recipients do not have consistent access to computers to receive electronically 

delivered notices from the Pension Plan. Thus, the Board of Trustees has taken no steps to ensure 

that electronically delivered notices are reasonably accessible to eligible recipients, since the 

Pension Plan does not currently use electronic means to deliver such notices. On the contrary, the 

Pension Plan only mails such notices via U.S. Postal Service First Class Mail.

The Board of Trustees of the Pension Plan did establish an informative website at 

http://www.bricklayers7rescue.com, and eligible recipients have been told to access the website 

for timely information, FAQs, a video clip from a town hall meeting held in Akron, Ohio on May 

23, 2016, and other helpful online materials. However, such online access has been completely 

optional, and the information provided on the website has been available through other means.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62031-62032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-58-009]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 7, 1997, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with 
an effective date of November 1, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 102
Sub Third Revised Sheet No. 176

    East Tennessee states that these sheets are filed in compliance 
with the Commission's October 30, 1997 Letter Order in the above-
referenced docket (October 30 Letter Order).
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission

[[Page 62032]]

in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30457 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Sylvester COPELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-404.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 11, 1970.

Sylvester Copeland, in pro per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brown v. State, 232 So.2d 55, 4th D.C.A., Opinion filed February 12, 1970 (on rehearing).

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50304 C onfer enc e C al endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. J UAN CA RL OS HER NAND EZ
- CA L VI L L O , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 08- C R
- 3373- 1
B ef ore K IN G , JO L LY , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Ju an C arl os H e rna n dez-C alvi ll o ( H erna n dez) ap pea l s t h e sentence i m po s e d f

o l l o w i ng hi s g ui l t y pl e a t o il l e ga lr e e nt r y. H e a r gue s t hathi s w i t hi ng u i d e l i n e s s e n t e n c e wa s g r e a t e rt h a n n e c e s s a r y t o s a t i s f y t h e g o a l s o f

1 8 U. S
. C. § 3 5 5 3 (a ). H e r n a n d e z d idn o t o bje c t t o th e s u b s ta n t i v e r e a s o n a b le n e s s o f h is s e n te n c e inth e d is tr ic t c o u r t; th e r e fo r e , o u r r e v ie w is fo rp la in e r r o ro n ly
. S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. Pel t i er , 5 0 5 F .3d 3 8 9 , 3 9 1 -9 2 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 7 ). United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 50304

2 H e r n a n d e z a r g u e s th a t U .S .S .G . § 2 L 1 .2 im p r o p e r lyd o u b le co u n te dh is p r io rc o n v ic tio n . W e h a v e reje c te dth e a r g u m e n t t h a t a s e n te n c e im p o s e din ac c or dance w i t h § 2L1. 2 i s gr eat er t han nec es sa r y t o m ee t § 3553( a )’ s go a l s as are s u lt o f th e a lle g e dd o u b le co u n tin gin h e r e n t in th a t G u id e lin e . S ee Un i t ed S ta tes v. D u a rte , 5 6 9 F
. 3 d 5 2 8 , 5 2 9 -31 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 130 S. C t . 378 (2 0 0 9 ). H erna n dez ad di t i on al l y argu es t h at t h e gu i del i n es r an ge fai l ed to ref l ect h is p ersonalhi st ory an d cha ract eri st i cs, argu i n g t h at hi s pu re m ot ive f or r e tu r n in gto th e U n ite dS ta te s m itig a te s th e s e r io u s n e s s o f t h e o ffe n s e . T h is a rg u m en t i s u n a va i l in g . Cf
. Un i t ed S t ate s v. G om ez- Herrera , 523 F. 3d 554, 5 6 5 -6 6 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 129 S. C t . 624 ( 200 8)
. Th e di st ri ct co u rt, w h i ch w as i n a sup eri or posit i on t o ap pl y t h e § 355 3( a) fact ors, consi dered and rej ect ed H e r n a n d e z ’ s a r g u m e n t. S ee Uni t e d St at e s v . Campo s - Maldo nado , 531 F. 3d 337, 3 3 9 ( 5 t h C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 9 S
. Ct
. 3 2 8 ( 2 0 0 8 )
. Th e r e c o r d r e f l e c t s t h att he d i stri ct cou rt did n ot com m i t error, p l a i n or oth erw i se, in d e te rm i n i n g th a t a sentence of 42 m on t h s of i m pri sonm en t w ou l d s ati sf y t h e sentenci n g obj ect ives o f § 3 5 5 3 (a ). AF F I RMED.
#### Verlon Edwin ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent.

No. 73-904.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### ALPHA ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. JEWEL BUILDERS, INC., a Delaware Corporation qualified to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1448.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 16, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 1977.

*700Charles L. Steinberg, Orlando, for appellant.

Charles M. Harris, Crofton, Holland, Starling, Harris & Severs, P. A., Titusville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Alpha Electric Supply, Inc., who was plaintiff in the trial court, brought suit for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The case went to trial before the judge without a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s presentation of evidence appel-lees moved for an involuntary dismissal which was granted. We reverse.

 A motion for an involuntary dismissal is in the nature of a motion for directed verdict. The same law is applicable. If sufficient evidence has been adduced, though conflicting, which, when considered in the light most favorable to the non-moving party would establish a prima facie case in favor of that party, then the motion should not be granted. A trial judge may not weigh evidence when ruling on such a motion. See *Tillman v. Baskin,*260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972) and *Realty Marts, Inc. v. Barlow,*312 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). We simply hold that the record reveals sufficient evidence, which, when considered together with all the reasonable inferences deducible therefrom, established a prima facie case.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

CROSS, ANSTEAD, and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         36,579
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,037
<INVENTORY>                                    105,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               265,699
<PP&E>                                         182,430
<DEPRECIATION>                                 89,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 425,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,292
<BONDS>                                        69,605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       104,697
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   425,664
<SALES>                                        323,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               323,941
<CGS>                                          237,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               53,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                31,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,972
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            21,190
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   21,190
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.55



</TABLE>
#### Valco CRUMP v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and National Gypsum Co.

No. 62299.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Valco Crump, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of *623Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 357 So.2d 1374.

Writ granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Opinion issued March 31 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00189
- CV

——————————— IN RE JIMMIE MARK PA RROTT, JR. , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Jimm i e Mark Parrott, Jr., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court compel the trial court in his underlying civil suit to “schedule a pretrial date, without delay, requiring all parties to appear; secure a bench warrant so that Relator can be present in person; rule on all motions and2

pretrial matters; and then proceed to trial the following week, not giving the Defendant any future continuances.” *
We deny the petition. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k) ( appendix must contain “a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of ”); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relato r’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding ”); see also Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (it is relator’s burden to provide record sufficient to establish right to relief ). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.

* The underlying case is Jimmie Mark Parrot, Jr. v. Beverly D. Melontree , cause number 2012

- 75176 , pending in the 125th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Kyle Carter presiding.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Lloyd L. NEEL, Relator, v. Hon. Murray W. OVERSTREET, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-1041.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Prohibition denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62658-62659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2645]


The Office of Defense Trade Controls; 60-Day Notice of Proposed 
Information Collection: DTC Customer Service Survey

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summaries the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Originating Office: The Office of Defense Trade Controls (PM/DTC).
    Title of Information collection: DTC Customer Service Survey.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Form Number: None.
    Respondents: U.S. Defense Industry Customers.

[[Page 62659]]

    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 150 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: November 4, 1997.
Eliza McClenaghan,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30733 Filed 11-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
Exhibit 21.1  Cobalt International Energy, Inc. Subsidiary List  Subsidiary
  
  Jurisdiction of FormationCIE Angola Block 9 Ltd.
  
  Cayman IslandsCIE Angola Block 20
  Ltd.
  
  Cayman IslandsCIE Angola Block 21
  Ltd.
  
  Cayman IslandsCIE Gabon Diaba Ltd.
  
  Cayman IslandsCIP GP Corp.
  
  DelawareCobalt GOM LLC
  
  DelawareCobalt GOM #1 LLC
  
  DelawareCobalt GOM #2 LLC
  
  DelawareCobalt International
  Energy, L.P.
  
  DelawareCobalt International
  Energy Angola Ltd.
  
  Cayman IslandsCobalt International
  Energy Gabon Ltd.
  
  Cayman IslandsCobalt International
  Energy Overseas Ltd.
  
  Cayman IslandsF Cobalt
  Holdings, Inc.
  
  DelawareF Cobalt Holdings LLC
  
  DelawareG Institutional Cobalt
  Holdings Corp.
  
  DelawareG Institutional Cobalt
  Holdings, LLC
  
  DelawareG Parallel Cobalt
  Holdings Corp.
  
  DelawareG Parallel Cobalt
  Holdings, LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Group LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Group II LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Group III LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Group IV LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Holdco LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Holdco II LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Holdco III LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Holdco IV LLC
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Partners LP
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Partners II LP
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Partners III
  LP
  
  DelawareK Cobalt Partners IV LP
  
  Delaware
Charitable gifts received by 501(c)(3) organizations 

Tax Year 

Total Amount 

($ billions) 

Share of Gross 

Domestic Product 

(%) 

2016 251.6 1.3 

2017 268.9 1.4 

2018 265.5 1.3 

U.S. Department of the Treasury February 20, 2020 

Office of Tax Analysis 

Notes: Includes forms received from 501(c)(3) organizations 

and processed by the end of the calendar year following 

each Tax Year. Specifically, includes returns filed for Tax 

Year 2016 and processed through December 2017, returns 

for Tax Year 2017 processed through December 2018, and 

returns for Tax Year 2018 processed through December 

2019. The data shown cover a portion of organizations that 

will eventually file a return for each Tax Year. For example, 

organizations whose 2018 Tax Years begin on July 1, 2018, 

are required to file a return by November 15, 2019, but, 

with a filing extension, may file as late as May 15, 2020. As 

such, the amounts shown in the table for Tax Years 2016 

and 2017 are less than half of the total charitable gifts 

ultimately received by 501(c)(3) organizations for those Tax 

Years. Complete data through Tax Year 2018 will be 

available after October 15, 2020. Amounts include 

contributions, gifts, grants, and other amounts received 

during the organization's tax year and reported on Form 

990 Part VIII Line 1h, Form 990-EZ Part 1 Line 1, or Form 990-

PF Part I, Line 1, Column (a). When an organization filed 

multiple returns in a Tax Year, these statistics include only 

the most recent return filed in each Tax Year. 

U.S. Department of the Treasury 

Office of Tax Analysis

February 20, 2020