alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30139]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5922-3]


Notice of Meeting of the EPA's Children's Health Protection 
Advisory Committee (CHPAC)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the first meeting 
of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be 
held on December 2 and 3, 1997, in Arlington, Virginia. The CHPAC was 
created to advise the Environmental Protection Agency in the 
development of regulations, guidance and policies to address children's 
environmental health.

DATES: Tuesday, December 2, 1997, from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and 
Wednesday, December 3, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:45 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hyatt Regency Crystal City at the Washington National 
Airport, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.

AGENDA ITEMS: The meeting of the CHPAC is open to the public. On 
Tuesday, December 2, 1997, the meeting will open with introductions, a 
review of the agenda and meeting objectives. The remaining agenda items 
for the first day of the meeting include (1) background and context of 
the Committee, (2) Office of Children's Health Protection's (OCHP) 
plan, (3) OCHP's Healthy Homes, Healthy Schools, Healthy Kids outreach 
campaign, and (4) introduction of the Work Groups. The meeting will 
continue on Wednesday, December 3, with (1) CHPAC Operating Principles 
and Ground Rules, (2) Work Group sessions and, (3) will conclude with a 
Plenary Session at which time the Work Groups will present their 
individual Work Plans and discuss future activities. The public will 
have an opportunity to comment at the end of both days.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Persons needing further information 
should contact Paula R. Goode, Office of Children's Health Protection, 
USEPA, WSM, 913, MC 1107, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460, (202) 
260-7778, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87e0e8e8e3e2a9f7e6f2ebe6c7e2f7e6eae6eeeba9e2f7e6a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd9a92929998d38d9c88919cbd988d9c909c9491d3988d9cd39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
E. Ramona Trovato,
Director, Office of Children's Health Protection.
[FR Doc. 97-30139 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period(s) covered in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: December 17, 2010 |   |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Colleen A. Zuhl     |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Colleen A. Zuhl         |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David A. Miller, certify that:

1) I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of OBA Financial Services, Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under the Companys
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report the Companys
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on the Companys most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 27, 2010

|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/s/ David A. Miller                              
|David A. Miller                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3752 

To prohibit requiring a pilot of an unmanned aircraft to hold a medical 

certificate as a condition for piloting such aircraft, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. BUDD, and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit requiring a pilot of an unmanned aircraft to 

hold a medical certificate as a condition for piloting 

such aircraft, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Qualifications for 

5 Pilots Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Unmanned aircraft pilots do not use their 

9 feet for things like rudder pedals to control their airVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:43 Feb 11, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3752.IS S3752

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3752 IS

1 craft and therefore, amputees might be qualified to 

2 serve as remote pilot in command without special ac3 commodation. 

4 (2) While flying, crewed aircraft pilots do not 

5 have ready access to quality medical care, whereas 

6 unmanned aircraft pilots and crew can directly and 

7 easily access both primary and emergency medical 

8 care. 

9 (3) The growing degree of automation in un10 manned aircraft systems allows for differently abled 

11 persons to fully and completely exercise the full 

12 range of system capabilities at the same level as 

13 anyone else. 

14 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING A PILOT OF AN UN15 MANNED AIRCRAFT TO HOLD A MEDICAL 

16 CERTIFICATE. 

17 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, neither 

18 the Secretary of Transportation nor the Administrator of 

19 the Federal Aviation Administration shall require (by reg20 ulation or other action) that a pilot of an unmanned air21 craft (as defined in section 44801 of title 49, United 

22 States Code) hold a first-class, second-class, or third-class 

23 medical certificate issued under part 67 of title 14, Code 

24 of Federal Regulations, as a condition for piloting such 

25 aircraft. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3752 IS

1 SEC. 4. MEDICAL QUALIFICATIONS. 

2 In promulgating any rule establishing a regulatory 

3 pathway for certification or approval of unmanned aircraft 

4 systems (as defined in such section 44801) to enable com5 mercial beyond visual line of sight operations and to the 

6 extent it is necessary to issue any new requirements per7 taining to the medical qualifications of unmanned aircraft 

8 operators, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Ad9 ministration shall consider the recommendations of the 

10 Beyond Visual Line of Sight Aviation Rulemaking Com11 mittee relating to the development of tailored medical 

12 qualifications for unmanned aircraft pilots and other crew 

13 members. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of The Navy


 Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Realignment of F/A-18 
Aircraft and Operational Functions From Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil 
Field, Florida to Other East Coast Installations and Draft Clean Air 
Act (CAA) Conformity Determination

Summary: The Department of The Navy Announces That the Public Comment 
Period For the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) And Draft 
Clean Air Act (CAA) Conformity Determination Which Evaluates The 
Realignment of F/A-18 Aircraft And Operational Functions From NAS Cecil 
Field, Florida To Other Navy And Marine Corps Air Stations On The East 
Coast Of The United States Has Been Extended By Two Weeks To December 
2, 1997.
    Pursuant to section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act 
(NEPA) of 1969 as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality 
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), the Department of the Navy filed 
a DEIS with Environmental Protection Agency on September 12, 1997. A 
Notice of Availability of the DEIS was published in the Federal 
Register on September 19, 1997. This notice provided for a 60-day 
public comment period on the DEIS which would have expired on November 
18, 1997. However, due to the fact that an additional public hearing 
has been scheduled for November 17, 1997 at the NC Aquarium in Manteo, 
NC (see Federal Register: October 31, 1997, Page 58950), the Navy has 
decided to extend the public comment period on the DEIS to December 2, 
1997. All comments/questions on the DEIS must be received by close of 
business (5 p.m.) on this date. Comments may be mailed to: Commander, 
Atlantic Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Attention: Mr. 
Dan Cecchini (Code 2032DC), 1510 Gilbert Street, Norfolk, VA 23511. 
Comments may also be faxed to (757) 322-4894.

Point of Contact: Additional information concerning this notice may be 
obtained by contacting Mr. Cecchini at (757) 322-4891.

    Dated: November 7, 1997.
Darse E. Crandall,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-29940 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60531-60532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--OBI Consortium Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 10, 1997, pursuant to 
Sec. 6(a)

[[Page 60532]]

of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 
U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the OBI Consortium Inc., 
(``Consortium'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Sec. 6(b) of 
the Act, the identities of the parties are: American Express, New York 
City, NY; Actra Business Systems, Sunnyvale, CA; Intelisys Electronic 
Commerce, LLC, New York City, NY; Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, 
CA; BASF Corporation, Mount Olive, NJ; BOC Group, Inc., Murray Hill, 
NJ; Corporate Express, Inc., Broomfield, CO; Stream International 
Holdings, Inc., Norwood, MA; Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI; W.W. 
Grainger, Inc., Lincolnshire, IL; F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd., Nutley, NJ; 
Office Depot, Inc., Delray, FL; Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX; United 
Technologies Corporation, Hartford, CT; VWR Scientific Products 
Corporation, W. Chester, PA; Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation, 
Itasca, IL; Eastman Chemical Co., Longview, TX.
    The venture was formed as a Delaware non-stock member corporation. 
The primary objective of the venture is to create and promote a 
standard to facilitate purchasing via the Internet and to cause the 
broad adoption of that specification by technology vendors, suppliers 
and customers, in order to facilitate efficient, economic business to 
business purchasing via the Internet.
    Membership in the Consortium will remain open and the Consortium 
will file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-29523 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Code Green Apparel Corp. 10-Q


Exhibit 10.24





 


 



     


     


    

 


 


 






    2 


     


    

 


 


 






    3 


     


    

 


 


 






    4 


     


    

 


 


 






    5 


     


    

 


 


 






    6 


     


    

 


 


 






    7 


     


    

 


 


 






    8 


     


    

 


 


 






    9 


     


    

 


 


 






    10 


     


    

 


 


 






    11 


     


    

 


 


 






    12 


     


    

 


 


 






    13
AFS-11-327-E October 19, 2011

Exemption No. 10374 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0549

Mr. Dean T. Peterson

Director of A&P School School of Missionary Aviation Technology 468 East Sprague Road d-175 Ionia, MI 48846

Dear Mr. Peterson:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By your letter dated May 16, and supplemental letter dated August 5, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of School of Missionary Aviation Technology (SMAT) for an exemption from § 65.75 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). Th is exemption, if granted, would allow SMAT to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following successful completion of the general curriculum, prior to meeting the experience requirements of 14 CFR § 65.77.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SMAT.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption Nos. 6569 and 8629 (copies enclosed), the FAA found that testing immediately after learning was a universally accepted instructional principle that reinforces learning. Therefore, we2

allow the petitioner to test students immediately after successfully completing the general curriculum but before meeting the requirements of § 65.77.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption Nos. 6569 and 8629;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption Nos. 6569 and 8629 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant School of Missionary Aviation Technology an exemption from 14 CFR § 65.75(a) to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following successful completion of the general curriculum but before meeting the experience requirements of § 65.77.

Condition and Limitation

 Before exercising the privileges of this exemption, SMAT must provide its operations handbook to its certificate holdi ng district office (CHDO) and receive approval of the operations handbook from the CHDO.

This exemption terminates on October 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

David C. Gilliom Acting Deputy Director, Flight

Standards Service

Enclosures
Agreement No. 35E137777
                                                           Date: October 1, 1999

                                  Exhibit 10.8


                                ISES Corporation

                       LICENSE AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT


     ISES  Corporation  has  appointed  the entity  named below as the  Licensee
("Licensee")  on the terms and conditions set forth in the attached  License and
Distribution Agreement.


Licensee:      Rockwell Collins, Inc.
               2001 West Mission Boulevard
               Pomona, CA   91766-1020

               Phone:  (909) 868-6165
               Fax:  (909) 868-1252

End User:      Air France,  45 rue de Paris,  F-95747  Roissy CDG cedex,  Paris,
               France

Territory:     Worldwide

Term:          [Confidential  treatment  has been  requested  for the  remaining
               portion of this Exhibit]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN H. JACKSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

N. AKABIKE,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 22

- 16109

D.C. No. 1:19

- cv

- 01442

- JLT

- EPG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 8, 202 2 * *

Before: WALLACE, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner John H. Jackson appeals pro se from the district

court ’s summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifferen ce to her serious medical needs

. We have jurisd iction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo

, Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 ( 9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 16109

2004) , and w e affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Jackson

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant was

deliberately indifferent in treating Jackson’s stomach issues

. See id. at 1057

- 60

( prison officials act with deliberate indifference only if they know of and disregard

a risk to the prisoner ’ s health; medical malpractice, negligence

, or difference of

opinion concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate

indifference ); Hallett v. Morgan , 296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002) (a prisoner

alleging deliberate indifference based on delay in treatment must show that the

delay caused significant harm)

.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents not filed with the district court. See United

States v. Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2006  accompanying  this
certification and filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey F. Feidelberg, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  to the  best of my  knowledge,  pursuant  to ss.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 14, 2006

                                            /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            --------------------------
                                            Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            Chief Financial Officer



                                       41