alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (h)(26)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Financial Services Firm (“you” or “Intermediary”),

 

As principal underwriter of the DWS Funds, we (or a predecessor firm) or our affiliate have entered into a selling group or other agreement or agreements (the "Agreement") with you to permit you, as applicable, to sell, service, or facilitate trading in shares of the DWS Funds (collectively, the "Shares").  

 

This amendment to the Agreement is entered into as of the date indicated in the signature block below, with an effective date of October 16, 2007, or such earlier date as of which you begin providing the Shareholder information described below, and includes the following provisions: 

 

**1. Agreement to Provide Information.**Intermediary agrees to provide the Fund, upon written request, the taxpayer identification number (“TIN”), the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (“ITIN”), or other government-issued identifier (“GII”), if known, of any or all Shareholder(s) of the account and the amount, date, name or other identifier of any investment professional(s) associated with the Shareholder(s) or account (if known), and transaction type (purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange) of every purchase, redemption, transfer, or exchange of Shares held through each account maintained by the Intermediary during the period covered by the request.

 

**2. Period Covered by Request.**Requests must set forth a specific period, not to exceed 90 days from the date of the request, for which transaction information is sought. The Fund may request transaction information older than 90 days from the date of the request as it deems necessary to investigate compliance with policies established by the Fund for the purpose of eliminating or reducing any dilution of the value of the outstanding shares issued by the Fund.

 

**3. Form and Timing of Response.**

 

(a)  Intermediary agrees to provide, promptly upon request of the Fund or its designee, the requested information specified in paragraph 1 above. If requested by the Fund or its designee, Intermediary agrees to use best efforts to determine promptly whether any specific person about whom it has received the identification and transaction information specified in paragraph 1 is itself a financial intermediary (“indirect intermediary”) and, upon further request of the Fund or its designee, promptly either (i) provide 

 

----
#### Ed GLUCKLER et al., Appellants, v. BEACHWOOD VILLAS, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

Interlocutory appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; C. Pfeiffer. Trowbridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2009, of Global Defense Technology & Systems,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 6, 2010
    /s/ James P. AllenJames P. AllenExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

 AmeriCorps Childcare Program Member Update

Please use this form to notify GAP Solutions of changes to your AmeriCorps Child Care Benefit 

Application. If you are starting a new term with AmeriCorps you must submit a New AmeriCorps 

Member Child Care Application. 

AmeriCorps Member Information

AmeriCorps Member Name: 

__________________________________

Member’s National Service Participant ID#: __________

(your NSPID # may be found in the My AmeriCorps Portal)

Change/Update to Child Care Application (check all that applies to you)

Change of Address Change of Work Site

Change in Family Size Change of Projected Service End Date

Change in Marital Status Change in Work Hours of Service

Change in Household Income Report Termination/Resignation from Service

Adding or Removing Child to/from Benefit

New Child Care Provider 

(A NEW Provider Application must be 

submitted)

Change in hours child needs child care Other

Use the explanation of change section below to further describe the changes or updates to your current 

application on file. Submission of additional forms/supporting documentation relating to the changed indicated 

above may be required; a Child Care Coordinator will contact you should additional information be needed.

Explanation of Change

Use this space to explain and describe the change(s) indicated above: 

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

CONFIRMATION

I affirm that the information provided in this update form (and any supporting documentation I provide) 

is true, correct and complete to the best of my ability, knowledge, and belief. 

 

_______________________________________________________ ______________

 AmeriCorps Member’s Signature Date
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period(s) covered in the  Report. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 5, 2009 |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/      Richard M. Lavers   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | Richard      M. Lavers       |
|   |   | Chief      Executive Officer |

----
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Jeffry E. Sterba    |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Jeffry                E. Sterba        |
|                                  |   | Chairman,                President and |
|                                  |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                  |   | PNM                Resources, Inc.     |
EXHIBIT 34.1


ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH


SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Shareholders


Entergy Texas, Inc.


Beaumont, Texas





We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria For Asset-Backed Securities, that Entergy Texas, Inc. (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB applicable for Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC’s Senior Secured Transition Bonds (the “Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), (1)(iii), (1)(iv), (2)(iii), (2)(vi), (4)(iii), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii), and (4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC’s Senior Secured Transition Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP








New Orleans, Louisiana


March 27, 2015
No. 99-40588 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40588 Summary Calendar

ALPHONSO SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STEVEN WILLIAMS, Sergeant, Coffield Unit; ALL DEFENDANTS; K. McCANN; T. HANDSBOROUAH; S. SANCHEZ; C. SLATER; K. MILLER; C.E. SMITH; UPSHAW; JOSPHEN PRICE; H.C. BRYANT; JOHN EASTON; BERNIE L. BUSH, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:98-CV-490

-------------------- April 14, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Alphonso Smith, Texas prisoner #621036, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. Smith contends that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical condition because they worked him beyond his medical limitations and that he did not receive due process at a disciplinary hearing presided over by one of the defendants. Because he failed to file objections to the magistrate judge’sNo. 99-40588 -2- report, Smith’s contentions are reviewed under the plain-error standard. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n , 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc). The record indicates that the defendants may have been negligent, slow to acknowledge that Smith was being worked beyond his medical restrictions, not that they were deliberately indifferent to those restrictions. The district court did not commit plain error by dismissing Smith’s deliberate-indifference claim. Mendoza v. Lynaugh , 989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993). It is unclear which of the hearings presided over by Officer Bernie Bush formed the basis of Smith’s claim against him. Regarding the October 7, 1996, hearing, the restrictions placed on Smith at that hearing did not impose atypical hardships on Smith in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life. Smith therefore failed to allege any due process violation. Sandin v. Conner , 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995). Regarding the November 5, 1996, hearing, Smith was punished in part with a loss of good-conduct time, and he has failed to have that hearing invalidated. He has no civil rights cause of action regarding that hearing. Edwards v. Balisok , 520 U.S. 641, 648-49 (1997).
AFFIRMED.
Jump to main content.

Grants and Debarment

Recent Additions | Contact Us**Search:**All EPAThis Area

    - You are here:  EPA Home
    - Grants and Debarment 
    - Application Kit for Federal Assistance
    - Table of Contents

----

# On-Line Grant Application Kit 

Letter to  Applicant 

Checklist for  Applications, Required Items to Be Submitted (pdf) 

Environmental  Protection Agency Regulations and Descriptions

Appendix D: Fact sheet for Applicants Intergovernmental Review Process

Budget Detail  Guidance (pdf) 

Application  Receipt Letter

Key Contact  Form

Standard Form  (SF) 424 Application for  Federal Assistance

SF-424A, Budget  Information - Non-Construction Programs

SF-424B  Assurances Non-Construction Programs 

Certification  Regarding Lobbying 

Instructions for  SF-LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

SF-LLL,  Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

EPA Form 4700-4:  Pre-award Compliance Review Report

Pre-Award Compliance For  Non-Profit Organizations

Environmental  Protection Agency (Headquarters) Mailing Address 

	If you cannot access the electronic forms, a paper application kit will be mailed upon request. Please send an e-mail to [email protected] with ‘PAPER APPLICATION KIT’ in the subject line. 

 

| Application      Kit for Federal Assistance | Letter      to Applicant | Applicable      EPA Regulations and Description | Grant    Application Forms | EEO Contacts | Checklist for Applications | Official Mailing    Addresses | On-Line Grant Application Kit |     | Appendix D: Fact sheet for Applicants Intergovernmental Review Process |     |     Returnto the Grants and Debarment Home Page |

----

### Local Navigation

    - Application Kit for Federal Assistance
    - Letter to Applicant
    - Applicable EPA Regulations and Description
    - Appendix D: Fact sheet for Applicants Intergovernmental Review Process
    - Grant Application Forms
    - EEO Contacts
    - Checklist for Applications
    - Official Mailing Addresses
    - On-Line Grant Application Kit
    - Return to the Grants and Debarment Home Page

----

    - EPA Home
    - Privacy and Security Notice
    - Contact Us

http://www.epa.gov/ogd/AppKit/contents.htm

Print As-Is

Last updated on Thursday, June 30, 2011
    - Share       - Facebook
      - reddit
      - Twitter
      - What is this?

Jump to main content.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-719 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CULTURAL PROPERTY 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MOLDOVA 

Signed at Washington June 20, 2001 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MOLDOVA 

Cultural Property 

 Agreement signed at Washington June 20, 2001; 

 Entered into force July 19, 2010.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United  States--east coast, Cape Hatteras to Straits of Florida  
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> [if !vml]>[endif]> C 55.418/7:11009/

Item Number:  [if !vml]>[endif]>0191-B-13 (online)
System Number: 000872005
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11009-8-1986.jpg
2012-05-23 11:12
32M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11009-8-1986.pdf
2012-05-23 14:12
32M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11009-11-1983.jpg
2012-05-23 11:12
30M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11009-11-1983.pdf
2012-05-23 14:10
30M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11009-11-1988.jpg
2012-05-23 11:13
35M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11009-11-1988.pdf
2012-05-23 14:13
35M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11009-12-1990.jpg
2012-05-23 11:13
30M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11009-12-1990.pdf
2012-05-23 14:15
30M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Thumbs.db
2012-05-23 14:15
26K
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July29, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### AIRCRAFT TAXI COMPANY, and David Bradshaw, Appellant, v. Leon FORD, Appellee.

No. 72-635.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1973.

High, Stack, Davis & Lazenby and William Friedlander, Miami, for appellant.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner & Hardy and Thomas E. Backmeyer, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff was awarded a jury verdict for $385.00 as damages in a negligence action. The verdict was in the exact amount of plaintiff’s medical expenses. The trial judge granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial “for the reason that the Jury verdict was contrary to the evidence.” We construe the ground expressed by the trial judge to be the same as a determination that the jury verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. The defendant has appealed. We affirm upon the basis of the holding in Grossman v. Short, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 11.

Affirmed.
#### Douglas TURBYFILL, alias v. STATE.

8 Div. 22.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 21, 1978.

*776Dave Beuoy, Russellville, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Milton E. Belcher, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BOWEN W. SIMMONS, Retired Circuit Judge.

Appellant-defendant, indicted for sodomy, was convicted by a jury with punishment fixed at ten years.

Defendant here argues that the indictment was for “carnal knowledge,” as that offense relates to a female. He then contends that there was a failure of proof because the victim was a male.

The contention is wholly without merit. The offense is embraced in § 13 — 1— 110, Code of Alabama 1975. The indictment follows the statutory form for this offense. § 15-8-150(95), p. 532, Code of Alabama 1975.

The judgment is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable BOWEN W. SIMMONS, a retired Circuit Judge, serving as a Judge of this Court, under the provisions of § 6.10, of the new Judicial Article (Constitutional Amendment No. 328); his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.