alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29250]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER97-3583-000 and ER97-4084-000]


GS Electric Generating Cooperative, Inc.; Denver City Energy 
Associates, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 31, 1997.
    GS Electric Generating Cooperative, Inc. (GS Electric) and Denver 
City Energy Associates, L.P. (Denver City) filed respective 
applications for authorization to sell power at market-based rates, and 
for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, GS Electric and 
Denver City requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 
18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liabilities by GS Electric and Denver City. On October 17, 1997, the 
Commission issued an Order Accepting for Filing Proposed Market-Based 
Rates (Order), in the above-docketed proceedings.
    The Commission's October 17, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (E), (F), and (H):
    (E) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by GS Electric 
and Denver City should file a motion to intervene or protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214.
    (F) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (E) above, GS Electric and Denver City are hereby 
authorized, pursuant to section 204 of the FPA, to issue securities and 
assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, indorser, surety or 
otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided that 
such issue or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate 
purposes of GS Electric and Denver City, compatible with the public 
interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    (H) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of GS 
Electric's and Denver City's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is November 17, 1997.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29250 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   August                    14, 2007 | By:    | /s/                    Jeffry E. Sterba    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |   | Jeffry                    E. Sterba        |
|                                                      |   | Chairman,                    President and |
|                                                      |   | Chief                    Executive Officer |
|                                                      |   | PNM                    Resources, Inc.     |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022767
<NAME> TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      930,160
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,884
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          37,806
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        30,935
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,000,785
<COMMON>                                           107
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      222,133
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             61,582
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 283,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,420
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           553,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 160,443
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,000,785
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      126,223
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,065
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     104,491
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     106,556
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         19,667
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 158
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  19,825
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        14,511
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,314
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         40
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    5,274
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         9,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       13,506
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3767 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3767

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to create or enhance penalties 
for murder and assault committed against a law enforcement officer, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 8 (legislative day, February 7), 2024

Mr. Tillis (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to create or enhance penalties 
for murder and assault committed against a law enforcement officer, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Fallen Law Enforcement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CRIMES.

    Part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in section 111, by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Commission Against a Law Enforcement Officer.--Whoever 
commits any act described in subsection (a)(1) against a Federal law 
enforcement officer, or against a State or local law enforcement 
officer if the perpetrator plans or facilitates the act with an 
instrument of interstate commerce or commits the act with a weapon that 
has traveled in interstate commerce, resulting in serious injury to the 
law enforcement officer, shall be imprisoned not less than 20 years.''; 
and
            (2) in chapter 51--
                    (A) by inserting after section 1122 the following:
``Sec. 1123. Protection of law enforcement officers
    ``Whoever commits the murder of a Federal law enforcement officer, 
or a State or local law enforcement officer if the perpetrator plans or 
facilitates the murder with an instrument of interstate commerce or 
commits the murder with a weapon that has traveled in interstate 
commerce, shall be sentenced as provided under section 1111 for murder 
in the first degree.''; and
                    (B) in the table of sections, by adding at the end 
                the following:

``1123. Protection of law enforcement officers.''.

SEC. 3. REPORT REQUIRED.

    Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the 
Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of 
Representatives a report on prosecutions conducted as the result of the 
amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03506

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 10, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Jeffry E. Sterba    |
|-----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Jeffry                E. Sterba        |
|                              |   | Chairman,                President and |
|                              |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                              |   | PNM                Resources, Inc.     |
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan

Item #35 

Does the application include a designation of power of attorney for each authorized representative 

who will represent the plan sponsor in connection with this application. 

See section 7.05 and Appendix B. 

The power of attorney is attached as document number 35.1. 

35.0
35.1
35.2
#### Robert Lee HERRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-898.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 13, 1969.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Maurice Jay Kutner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Robert Herron, is appealing a judgment of conviction and sentence entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of the unlawful sale of marijuana.

The sole point presented for our determination on appeal is whether there was sufficient, competent substantial evidence to support the verdict and the adjudication and sentence for the crime of unlawful sale of marijuana.

We have carefully reviewed the record! and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict and the court’s adjudication and sentence. Sealey v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 894.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 11, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00341

- CV

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY OF SAN ANTONIO & SAROSH

MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a A

- Z Food Mart,

Appellant s

v.

EAST CENTRAL INDEP ENDENT SCH OOL DISTRICT,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009

- CI

- 17596

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee's unopposed motion for extension of ti me t o f ile brief and request for expedited

ruling is hereby MOOT. Appellee's brief is due on or before September 2, 2014.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
FILED: October 2, 2018

PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1173 (L) 

(LRH-2015-582-GBR)

SIERRA CLUB; WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION; INDIAN CREEK 

WATERSHED ASSOCIATION; APPALACHIAN VOICES; CHESAPEAKE 

CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK

Petitioners

v.

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; MARK T. ESPER, in his 

official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army; TODD T. SEMONITE, in his official 

capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and commanding General of the U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers; PHILIP M. SECRIST, in his official capacity as District 

Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District; MICHAEL 

E. HATTEN, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps 

of Engineers, Huntington District

Respondents

MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC

Intervenor

O R D E R
2

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners ask this Court to set aside Respondent U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 

(the “Corps”) December 22, 2017, verification and July 3, 2018, reinstated verification that 

construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (the “Pipeline”) can proceed under the terms 

and conditions of Clean Water Act Nationwide Permit 12 (“NWP 12”), rather than an 

individual permit. Among other arguments, Petitioners assert that, in issuing its 

verification, the Corps improperly imposed one condition—requiring use of a “dry cut” 

method for constructing four river crossings—“in lieu of” a special condition imposed by 

the State of West Virginia, J.A. 232—that “[i]ndividual stream crossings must be 

completed in a continuous, progressive manner within 72 hours,” J.A. 43—as part of its 

certification of NWP 12. Construction of each of the four river crossings using the “dry 

cut” method is expected to take four-to-six weeks to complete.

Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 717r(d)(1), we conclude, for reasons 

to be more fully explained in a forthcoming opinion, that the Corps lacked authority to 

substitute the “dry cut” requirement “in lieu of” West Virginia’s 72-hour temporal 

restriction. Accordingly, we VACATE, in its entirety, the Corps’ verification of the 

Pipeline’s compliance with NWP 12. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2); 33 C.F.R. § 330.6(d) 

(explaining that if any part of a project requires an individual permit, then “the NWP does 

not apply and all portions of the project must be evaluated as part of the individual permit 
3

process.”). We reserve judgment on the parties’ remaining arguments until our 

forthcoming opinion.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

 Clerk
Item 77C  Strategic Income Fund

Registrant incorporates by reference to its Proxy Statement filed
on January 4, 2008 (SEC Accession No. 0001193125-08-
001722).
The Special Meeting of Shareholders of DWS Strategic Income
Fund (the "Fund") was held on March 31, 2008 at the offices of
Deutsche Asset Management, 345 Park Avenue, New York,
NY 10154. The following matters were voted upon by the
shareholders of said Fund (the resulting votes are presented
below):
1.	Election of the Board of Trustees.

Number of Votes:
Trustee
For
Withheld
John W. Ballantine
53,270,725.4991
1,993,287.8030
Henry P. Becton, Jr.
53,259,450.3381
2,004,562.9640
Dawn-Marie Driscoll
53,288,660.6081
1,975,352.6940
Keith R. Fox
53,277,391.4051
1,986,621.8970
Paul K. Freeman
53,292,983.0801
1,971,030.2220
Kenneth C. Froewiss
53,290,376.5101
1,973,636.7920
Richard J. Herring
53,300,557.7231
1,963,455.5790
William McClayton
53,285,719.4731
1,978,293.8290
Rebecca W. Rimel
53,289,559.3301
1,974,453.9720
William N. Searcy, Jr.
53,278,905.3891
1,985,107.9130
Jean Gleason Stromberg
53,292,475.2791
1,971,538.0230
Robert H. Wadsworth
53,279,803.7631
1,984,209.5390
Axel Schwarzer
53,277,474.4911
1,986,538.8110

2.	Approval of an Amended and Restated Investment
Management Agreement.
Number of Votes:
For
Against
Abstain
39,172,748.8701
1,539,446.9440
2,706,339.4880

3.	Approval of a Subadvisor Approval Policy.
Number of Votes:
For
Against
Abstain
39,001,945.4221
1,709,820.3130
2,706,769.5670

4.	Approval of the Revised Fundamental Investment Policy
regarding Commodities.
Number of Votes:
For
Against
Abstain
38,995,423.9561
1,654,088.5000
2,769,022.8460

The Meeting was reconvened on June 13, 2008, at which time
the following matter was voted upon by the shareholders. (the
resulting votes are presented below):
4A.	Approval of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust.

Number of Votes:
For
Against
Abstain
43,391,047.1741
1,521,365.9140
3,140,967.8220
# Official Journal L 349/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 349 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6321 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 349

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6321 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1527 of 21 October 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Aceite de Ibiza’/‘Oli d’Eivissa’ (PGI)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1528 of 14 October 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pimientos del Piquillo de Lodosa’ (PDO)) | 2 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1529 of 14 October 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Colatura di alici di Cetara’ (PDO)) | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1527 of 21 October 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Aceite de Ibiza’/‘Oli d’Eivissa’ (PGI))

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1528 of 14 October 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pimientos del Piquillo de Lodosa’ (PDO))

2

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1529 of 14 October 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Colatura di alici di Cetara’ (PDO))

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Donald R. CREWS and Lucille G. Crews, husband and wife, Appellants, v. The DANIA BANK, a Florida Banking Corporation, Marinoff Construction of South Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Herbert S. Freehling, as trustee in bankruptcy of Marinoff Construction of South Florida, Inc., Richard E. Biery and Jay Ann Biery, husband and wife, Apple Creek Development Corp., a Florida Corporation, and Elias Bernatan, Appellees.

No. 77-974.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1978.

R. T. Shankweiler of Patterson, Maloney & Shankweiler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Dixon Thomas of Walden & Walden, Da-nia, for appellee The Dania Bank.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Affirmed on authority of *The Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union v. Lake Buena Vista Communities, Inc.,*349 So.2d 1217 (Fla.4th DCA 1977) and *Punta Gorda Ready Mixed Concrete, Inc. v. Green Manor Construction Co.,*166 So.2d 889 (Fla.1964).

AFFIRMED.

GROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.
#### Robert D. HICKMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1972.

John L. Riley, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Clarke, Fla.App. 4th 1970, 242 So.2d 791.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6681

DARNELL NASH,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, Northern Neck Regional Jail,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00205-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: October 9, 2020 Decided: October 15, 2020

Before AGEE, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darnell Nash, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darnell Nash, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on 

her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Nash v. Warden, No. 1:20-cv-00205-LMB-JFA (E.D. 

Va. Apr. 9, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED