alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61835-61836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Assurance of Equipment Operability and Containment Integrity 
During Design-Basis Accident Conditions; Issue

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued Generic 
Letter (GL) 96-06, Supplement 1 to inform all holders of operating 
licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently 
ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently 
removed from the reactor vessel, about ongoing efforts and new 
developments associated with GL 96-06, and to provide additional 
guidance that addressees may find useful in planning and scheduling 
future actions associated with GL 96-06. This generic letter is for 
information

[[Page 61836]]

only; no specific action or written response is required. Conformance 
with the guidance provided in the generic letter is voluntary.
    The generic letter is available in the NRC Public Document Room 
under accession number 9711050091.

DATES: The generic letter was issued on November 13, 1997.

ADDRESSEES: Not applicable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth A. Wetzel at (301) 415-1355.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Addressees of GL 96-06 have experienced 
difficulty in determining and implementing corrective actions for 
resolving the issues identified in the generic letter. Additionally, 
questions have been raised regarding (1) the risk implications of 
installing relief valves to deal with the thermal overpressurization 
issue; (2) the use of the ASME Code, Section III, Appendix F, criteria 
for permanent resolution of the thermal overpressurization issue; and 
(3) the NRC staff's closure of Generic Safety Issue 150, 
``Overpressurization of Containment Penetrations.'' Given these 
considerations, risk insights, and industry initiatives that are being 
considered or that may be proposed, addressees may require additional 
time to fully evaluate and resolve the GL 96-06 issues. Therefore, 
addressees who find it necessary to revise their corrective actions or 
schedular commitments for resolving GL 96-06 issues may submit a 
revised response to the generic letter. Nevertheless, specific 
corrective actions that have been defined and are clearly needed should 
not be delayed without suitable justification.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of November 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David B. Matthews,
Acting Director, Division of Reactor Program Management, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-30332 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60702-60703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-2-76-000]


Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.; Notice of Tariff Filing

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, Wyoming Interstate Company 
(WIC) tendered for filing as part of its FERC

[[Page 60703]]

Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 5.2 and 
Second Revised Volume No. 2, Sixth Revised Sheet No. 4A reflecting an 
increase in the percentage for Fuel, Lost and Unaccounted-for Gas (FL&U 
Percentage) from 0.31% to 0.49% effective December 1, 1997.
    WIC states that copies of the filing were served upon the company's 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions, and are 
otherwise available for public inspection at WIC's offices in Colorado 
Springs, Colorado.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29697 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2
   CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with this Quarterly Report of China Teletech Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yuan Zhao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Teletech Limited.
  Date: September 22, 2010
By:
/s/ Yuan ZhaoYuan ZhaoChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0628

_________________

WES ADAMS,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

The record was filed for purposes of this appeal on November 30, 2023. Nothing 

further has been filed, and the opening brief is now overdue.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file, and serve the 

opening brief on appeal no later than February 20, 2024. Failure to file the brief within 

that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 17 2024

01/17/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0628
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

335 KA 12-01520 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STEPHEN M. WAPNIEWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

NORMAN P. EFFMAN, PUBLIC DEFENDER, WARSAW (GREGORY A. KILBURN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Michael F. Griffith, J.), rendered July 24, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and welfare fraud in the fifth degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, welfare fraud in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 158.05). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his contention that County Court erred in directing him to pay a specified amount of restitution without conducting a hearing “inasmuch as that amount was an explicit part of defendant’s agreed-upon plea bargain” ( People v Taylor , 70 AD3d 1121, 1122, lv denied 14 NY3d 845; see People v Thomas , 77 AD3d 1325, 1326, lv denied 16 NY3d 800).

Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60330

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEXTER CONROD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:94-CV-113

- - - - - - - - - -

December 15, 1997

Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dexter Conrod, federal prisoner # 09532-043, seeks to appeal

the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside,

or correct his sentence, the denial of his motion to amend his

§ 2255, the denial of his “Motion for Relief from Judgment Under

Rule 60(b) (“Rule 60(b) motion”), and the denial of his motion

entitled “The Petitioner’s Request for Reconsideration Pro-Se.” 

He has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
No. 96-60330

- 2 -

(IFP) on appeal and also requests the appointment of appellate

counsel.

Conrod timely appealed only from the district court’s denial

of his motion to amend his § 2255 motion and his Rule 60(b)

motion. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). The district court did not abuse

its discretion in denying the motion to amend and the Rule 60(b)

motion. Carimi v. Royal Carribean Cruise Line, Inc., 959 F.2d

1344, 1345 (5th Cir. 1992); Briddle v. Scott, 63 F.3d 364, 379

(5th Cir. 1995). Because Conrod has not demonstrated that he

will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal, the motion for IFP

is DENIED. Conrod’s request for the appointment of counsel is

also DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED. MOTIONS DENIED.
#### Dorothy GREENSTEIN, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Greenstein, deceased, Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 69-957.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

Petitioner

* Misc. Docket AG

v.

* No. 32

EDWARD GONZALEZ

* September Term, 2019

Respondent

CORRECTED ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance

Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Edward Gonzalez , to suspend the

Respondent from the practice of law indefinitely for v iolating Rule s 1.4(b), 1 .16(d) and

8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers ’ Rules of Professional Conduct

, and the record herein, it

is this 27th day of September , 2019;

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Edward

Gonzalez

, be suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland indefinitely ; and

it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Edward Gonzalez

from the registry of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the trustee s of the Client

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State

in accordance with Maryland Rule 19

- 761

.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1765 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  Union Calendar No. 27
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1765

                          [Report No. 117-44]

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing a proposed rule 
relating to restricted access to the Washington Channel in Washington, 
                     D.C., and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2021

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                              May 28, 2021

   Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; 
committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing a proposed rule 
relating to restricted access to the Washington Channel in Washington, 
                     D.C., and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Washington Channel Public Access 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF RULE.

    The Secretary of the Army may not finalize, implement, or enforce 
the proposed rule entitled ``Washington Channel, Fort McNair, 
Washington, DC; Restricted Area'', published by the Department of the 
Army on December 29, 2020 (Docket No. COE-2019-0010; 85 Fed. Reg. 
85570), or any other rule that restricts public access to the 
Washington Channel in Washington, DC.
                                                  Union Calendar No. 27

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1765

                          [Report No. 117-44]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To prohibit the Secretary of the Army from implementing a proposed rule 
relating to restricted access to the Washington Channel in Washington, 
                     D.C., and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 28, 2021

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1832 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to pay a per diem to certain members 

of the National Guard who performed certain duty in the National 

Capital Region during the period beginning on January 26, 2021, and 

ending on March 15, 2021. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. HUIZENGA (for himself, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. 

HERRELL, Mrs. MCCLAIN, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. MEIJER, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. CAWTHORN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, 

Mrs. WALORSKI, and Mr. STEUBE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to pay a per diem to 

certain members of the National Guard who performed 

certain duty in the National Capital Region during the 

period beginning on January 26, 2021, and ending on 

March 15, 2021. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guard Reimbursement 

5 for Unhealthy Bites Act’’ or the ‘‘GRUB Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1832 IH

1 SEC. 2. PER DIEM FOR MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL 

2 GUARD WHO PERFORMED CERTAIN DUTY IN 

3 THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 

4 (a) PER DIEM REQUIRED.—The Secretary of De5 fense shall pay to a covered member a per diem— 

6 (1) for each day the covered member performed 

7 covered duty during the covered period; and 

8 (2) equal to the proportional meal rate deter9 mined by the Defense Travel Management Office for 

10 the National Capital Region. 

11 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

12 (1) The term ‘‘covered duty’’ means duty per13 formed— 

14 (A) in the National Capital Region; and 

15 (B) in support of the mission in response 

16 to the attacks on January 6, 2021, on the Cap17 itol Buildings and the United States Capitol 

18 Grounds (described in sections 5101 and 5102 

19 of title 40, United States Code). 

20 (2) The term ‘‘covered member’’ means a mem21 ber of the National Guard deployed to the National 

22 Capital Region to perform covered duty. 

23 (3) The term ‘‘covered period’’ means the pe24 riod beginning on January 26, 2021, and ending on 

25 March 15, 2021. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1832 IH

1 (4) The term ‘‘National Capital Region’’ has 

2 the meaning given that term in section 2674 of title 

3 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2983]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; (OFI-10)

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Comment Request Review of a Revised Information Collection 
(Form OFI-10).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13) and 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(i)(iv), this notice announces that OPM 
has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request 
for clearance of a revised information collection. The Mail 
Reinterview, OFI Form 10, is completed by individuals who have been 
interviewed by a contract investigator during the course of a personnel 
investigation. This form asks questions regarding the performance of 
the investigator.
    It is estimated that 5700 individuals will respond annually, each 
response requiring approximately 6 minutes to complete, for a total 
burden of 570 hours.
    For copies of this proposal contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c76717a7d6e6e73725c736c71327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b71767d7a696974755b746b76357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before march 
10, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Richard A. Ferris, Office of Personnel Management, Investigations 
Service, 1900 E. Street NW., Room 5416, Washington, D.C. 20415

    and

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

James B. King,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-2983 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEER**

 

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating (i) a portion of Cenovus Energy Inc. oil and gas reserves data, including estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2014, estimated using forecast prices and costs, and (ii) the contingent resources and prospective resources of Cenovus Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2014, estimated using forecast prices and costs, and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in Cenovus Energy Inc.’s annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and Cenovus Energy Inc.’s registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-163397), Form F-3D (File No. 333-166419), and Form F-10 (File No. 333-196696), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.

 
| MCDANIEL &   ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD. |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              |   |
| /s/   P.A. Welch                                  |   |
| P.A.   Welch, P. Eng.                             |   |
| President &   Managing Director          |   |
|                                              |   |
| Calgary,   Alberta                                |   |
| February 13,   2015                          |   |

 

----
#### 6300 GULF CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Alvin T. MORRIS, Respondent.

No. 73-482.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 1, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### Jessie Taylor "Pete” WHITE v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49871.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 17, 1977.

Edward L. Whitten, Sr., Hernando, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Catherine W. Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Grenada County; Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and LEE, JJ.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, BROOM and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
accompanying this certification and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Geoffrey F. Feidelberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date: May 15, 2003

                               /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                              ----------------------------------
                               Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                               Chief Financial Officer
International Association of Machinists Motor City Pension Fund

EIN/Plan #: 38-6237143/001 

Checklist Item #16 – 4.05(3) Steps Taken to Ensure Electronic Notices Are Reasonably 

Accessible 

16.1 

Does the application describe the steps the plan sponsor has taken to ensure that notices 

delivered electronically are reasonable accessible to the recipients? 

See section 4.05(3).

The Pension Fund does not maintain a web site nor has delivered any notices to participants 

electronically.
#### Thomas A. BENFIELD, Petitioner, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-1237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.