alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-315 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Signed at Washington January 23, 2012 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Environmental Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington January 23, 2012; 

 Entered into force March 15, 2012. 








1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1150

960

880

980

1000

1130

960

830

1000

950

930

790

640

970

900

670

910

1070

1020

1090

1030

1080

810

1010

820

970

690

800

990 1120

1140

870

760

680

750

610

990

1040

660

890

1010

700

1000

850

650

920

740

770

730

1110

1160

1060 840

980

1030

860

23

23

61

61

C O N G D O N B LV D

L A K E W O O D R D

L E S T E R

R IV E R

R D

C O N G D O N B LV D

23

23

61

61

C O N G D O N B LV D

L A K E W O O D R D

L E S T E R

R IV E R

R D

C O N G D O N B LV D

Lester River

L A K E S U P E R I O R

Lakewood

Moose

Mountain

Lester Park

Municipal

Golf Course

Lester Park

Municipal

Golf Course

Superior Poplar NE

Knife

River Arnold

Lakewood

Parkland

French

River

Duluth

430

92°

46°

91° 30"

51

51

5 5

5

85

81

83

78

83 000FEET (MN)

490

00'

30"

47'

51

51

51

51

51

5

5

81

78

N

86

81

79

000

000

000

930

91°52'

470

57'

57'

46° 45'

47'30"

50'

51

51

51

51

000m

5

77 85

87

88

89

90

620

000

30"

30" 55'

46°

50'

51

51

51

5 5

79

86

90

79 N

FEET (MN) 84

000m

46°

30"

51

51

51

51

51

51

000m

5 5

5

80

82

910 000

1

000

55'

52'

45'

51

51

51

51

5

5

83

88

83 E

000

2

FEET (MN)

E

FEET (MN)

FEET (WI)

00'

52' 30"

52'

51

5 5

84

80

82

84

91

82 84

FEET (WI)

1

FEET (WI) 2

590

460

92° 30"

51

000m 91

85

87

80 82

78 80 81

FEET (WI)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

MINNESOTA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

LAKEWOOD, MN-WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

LAKEWOOD QUADRANGLE

MINNESOTA-WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 15T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Minnesota Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

and Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

Imagery...................................................NAIP, August 2009

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2009

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1999

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 46 ́

14 MILS

0° 42 ́

12 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

15T

WM

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
[Cite as State v. McAlmont, 133 Ohio St.3d 162, 2012-Ohio-4327.] 

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCALMONT, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as State v. McAlmont, 133 Ohio St.3d 162, 2012-Ohio-4327.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell. 

(No. 2011-0065—Submitted September 12, 2012—Decided September 27, 2012.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, 

No. 09-CA-21, 2010-Ohio-5879. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority 

of State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012-Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LANZINGER, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., 

concur. 

LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., dissent for the reasons 

stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012-

Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243. 

__________________ 

 D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew 

Picek, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. 

 Murr, Compton, Claypool & Macbeth and Charles M. Blue, for appellee. 

______________________
EXHIBIT 10.7


 




AMENDMENT NO. 6

TO

 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is effective as of January 8, 2018 (the "Effective Date") by and between U.S. Geothermal Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Jonathan Zurkoff ("Employee").


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement with a term from December 31, 2010 until March 31, 2013 (the "Agreement").


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into a series of amendments to the Agreement, each providing for a one-year's extension of the Agreement in addition to other amendments to the Agreement.


WHEREAS, the Agreement, as previously amended, is in effect until March 31, 2018.


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend and extend the Agreement on the terms and conditions as set forth below.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the Agreement and this Amendment, the parties hereby agree as follows:



		1.	
Term. The term of the Agreement as set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement, is hereby extended and will remain in full force and effect until July 31, 2018.








		2.	
Savings Clause. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement, as previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect, and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.







[signature page follows]
















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on January 8, 2018.


U.S. Geothermal Inc.


A Delaware corporation








	By: 	/s/ Douglas Glaspey                        	






		Name:	
Douglas Glaspey








		Title:	
Interim CEO

















SIGNED by the Employee in the presence of:







 



	
/s/ Kerry D. Hawkley         


Witness

	
/s/ Jonathan Zurkoff   


Jonathan Zurkoff


	
 

	
 


	
Kerry D. Hawkley                


Printed Name of Witness
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    Exhibit 11.1



                   ARBOR HEALTH CARE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                                                ---------------------------------------------------
                                                                   1994                1995               1996
                                                                   ----                ----               ----
                                                                       (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>                <C>    
Net income (1)................................................       $6,903              $8,452             $10,223
                                                                ===========        ============       =============
Weighted average shares outstanding
  Common Stock................................................        6,802               6,848               6,896
  Common Stock equivalents based upon the
              treasury stock method...........................           40                  33                  73
                                                                -----------        ------------       -------------
Totals(2)                                                             6,842               6,881               6,969
                                                                ===========        ============       =============
Net income per share (1) divided by (2).......................        $1.01               $1.23               $1.47
                                                                ===========        ============       =============
</TABLE>
#### W. H. COX, II v. SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER CO. et al. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. v. W. H. COX, II, et al.

No. 60303.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Hartford Fire Ins. Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo.

Application denied; no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
# L_2005184EN.01005301.xml

| 15.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 184/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 184/53

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1135/2005

of 14 July 2005

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 8 to 14 July 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
# L_2005058EN.01000301.xml

| 4.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 362/2005

of 3 March 2005

providing for the rejection of applications for export licences in the cereal sector in relation to products of CN code 1101 00 15

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003 of 27 July 2003 laying down special detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences for cereals and rice (2), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003, applications for export licences with advance fixing of refunds for products falling within CN code 1101 00 15 made on 1 March 2005 shall be rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 189, 29.7.2003, p. 12. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1092/2004 (OJ L 209, 11.6.2004, p. 9).

2

---
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1003 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FRANCE 

Signed at Vienna October 3, 2008 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
FRANCE 

Nuclear Safety 

 Arrangement signed at Vienna October 3, 2008; 

 Entered into force October 3, 2008. 

 With annex. 

 











Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the French text of this Arrangement. If the French text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Domain Extremes Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Tang, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 23, 2011





/s/ Stephen TangStephen Tang

Treasurer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Domain Extremes, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1996           
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                   1
<CASH>                            569,731
<SECURITIES>                    5,343,814
<RECEIVABLES>                      44,642
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                6,136,254    
<PP&E>                          3,877,928
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 10,039,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              59,060
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                        4,805,563
<OTHER-SE>                      5,175,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   10,039,696 
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  113,890     
<CGS>                                   0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     799,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (685,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (685,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (685,884)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
#### ROY F. ROBERTS AND SON LAND DEVELOPERS, INC., and The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellants, v. J. D. HORNE & SONS, INC., Appellee.

No. 70-748.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 23, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; B. C. Muszynski, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
#### George P. DONALDSON, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLANTATION, Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-296.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Lamar Warren, Judge.

Dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2013

s0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2013

146677

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146677

COA: 307782

Kent CC: 11

- 006290

- FC

GREGORY TODD MULDER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2012

j udgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
----

|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   May      6, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Jeffry E. Sterba    |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                    |   | Jeffry      E. Sterba        |
|                                    |   | Chairman,      President and |
|                                    |   | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                                    |   | PNM      Resources, Inc.     |

----
#### CRAFT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Joseph HARVEST and Jean Harvest, Appellees.

No. 70-533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Cassel & Benjamin, Miami, for appellant.

Tobias Simon, and Beverly Ruth Gure-vitz, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

*179PER CURIAM.

We affirm the action of the trial judge here under review, without prejudice to the appellant’s instituting an independent action in the nature of a creditor’s bill or such other relief as it may be advised attempting to reach assets which may be the property of the judgment debtors, save and except those assets previously identified in the prior opinion of this court found in Harvest v. Craft Construction Corporation, Fla.App.l966, 187 So.2d 72, which have been declared to be the property of the children of the judgment debtors.

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3839 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

203 East 6th Street in Lexington, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Bill Barrett Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2024 

Mr. RICKETTS (for himself and Mrs. FISCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 203 East 6th Street in Lexington, Nebraska, 

as the ‘‘Bill Barrett Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BILL BARRETT POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 203 East 6th Street in Lex6 ington, Nebraska, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Bill Barrett Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3839 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bill Barrett Post Of3 fice Building’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS