T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P AT R I C K G AT HI GI KA R AN J A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70564 A ge nc yN o. A 088- 736- 495 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 20, 2011 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P a tr i c k G a thi gi K ar anj a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of K e ny a , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r o m an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, an dr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) .



# FI LED MA Y04 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70564 2 O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s , Na g o u lko v . I

NS , 3 3 3 F .3 d1 0 1 2 , 1 0 1 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yi n p artan dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. K ar an jad o e s n o t r a is e an yc h a lle n g e to th e B I A ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t h is a s y l um appl i c a t i on i s t i m e - barr e d. S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the B I A ’ s f i ndi ng tha tK ar anj adi d not est ab l i sh p astp ersecu t i o n o r a cl ear p ro b ab i l i ty o f fu tu re p ersecu t i o n i n K en ya because he f

ai l ed t o d em on strat e thata prot ec t ed grou nd w as atl ea ston e c entra l r e a s o n f o rth e d e a th o f

h is f a th e r . See P arussim ova v. Mukasey , 555 F . 3d 734, 7 4 0 - 4 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . A c c o r d in g ly , K ar an ja ’s w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im fai l s. W e r e

je c t K ar an

ja ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A f a ile dto a d d r e s s h is C A T c la im because i texpres sl y f

ou nd he fa i l ed t o rai se any argum entre gardi ng the IJ ’ s deni al o f C A T r e lie f

. W e la c kju r is d ic tio n to c o n s id e rth e m e r its o f K ar an ja ’s C A T c la im b e c au s e h e d idn o t e x h au s t it b e f o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ).09- 70564 3 F i na l l y , w e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w K ar anj a ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons b e c au s e th e yar e e ith e ru n e x h au s te d , s e e B arr on , 35 8 F . 3d at67 8, or chal l enge a B I A o r d e rth a t is n o t p r o p e r lyb e f o r e th is c o u rt, se e 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2(a) (5) ( a pet i t i on for r evi ew i s the excl usi ve m eans of j ud i ci alre vi ew ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.