alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Humidity, Temperature and Voltage

2012 PV Module Reliability 

Workshop

Golden, CO

John Wohlgemuth

NREL

March 1, 2012

NREL/PR-5200-54836
Humidity, Temperature and Voltage

Scope:

The ingress of moisture with or without electrical bias has been shown to cause 

corrosion and charge movement in PV modules. Temperature and humidity have 

been used as accelerated stress tests for PV modules for many years. However, the 

use of constant exposure tests, such as the existing Damp Heat Test of 85 C and 

85% RH for 1000 hours, appears to result in relative humidity levels far above that 

which will ever be seen outdoors for breathable package designs and may 

overstress the module. On the other hand, for semi-hermetic designs, 1000 hours 

may not be long enough to simulate 20 years of moisture ingress through the 

moisture barriers. There are multiple humidity and humidity/electrical bias 

degradation modes with widely varying acceleration factors. The group's 

development of true accelerated lifetime tests must take variation of 

environmental conditions into account.

Created 2 groups – Japan and Rest of World
Methodology

How we should develop lifetime tests for humidity

 Determine outdoor failure modes

 Try to duplicate failures using accelerated tests

 Model water ingress in field versus test chamber and then 

how moisture leads to observed degradation in order to 

determine acceleration factors

Most proposals for lifetime tests for humidity

 Extend the 85/85 damp heat test

 Determine which modules perform better

 Assume this relationship will hold in field

Problems with this approach

 85/85 never occurs in real world

 Failure mode occurring after long term 85/85 testing is not 

observed in field
Modeling of Humidity Ingress into backside of Modules

 Modeling of humidity levels in back of PV module with polymeric backsheet in Bangkok, 

Thailand.

 Damp heat test conditions (85/85) never occurs within module.

 When module has high humidity it cool.

 When module is hot it has low humidity.
Modeling of Humidity Ingress into front side of Modules

Conclusions/Recommendations

 Bake-offs (long times at 85/85) do not duplicate field 

failures.

 Need field data, samples & analysis methods 

(probably for all 4 groups)

◦ Lets discuss how we can set up a system to collect this data 

without identifying specific manufacturers or giving away 

proprietary information.

 Need to determine exactly what mechanism(s) are 

leading to module degradation in field.

 Will have to perform modeling to understand those 

degradation mechanisms and how they can be 

accelerated.

 Then will have to design new accelerated stress tests 

that can duplicate the field failures.
#### Robert R. DEMPSEY, Royall P. Terry, Jr., and Robert W. Wennerholm, Petitioners, v. STATE RETIREMENT COMMISSION and Division of Retirement, Department of Administration, Respondents.

No. EE-165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 26, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1978.

Robert R. Dempsey, Miami, for petitioners.

L. Keith Pafford, Nancy G. Limman, E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for review is DENIED. See *Shields v. Division of Retirement et al.,*352 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

BOYER, Acting C. J., concurring specially.

BOYER, Acting Chief Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur with the majority, but only in deference to the doctrine of stare decisis and the majority of another panel of this court. Had I been a member of the panel considering *Shields v. Division of Retirement,*cited above, I would have agreed with the well reasoned and articulated dissent authored by Judge Rawls. However, I was not a member of that panel and it is clear that the decision in that case is determinative here.

Further, in my view, *Shields v. Division of Retirement*and this decision affects a class of constitutional or state officers and passes upon a question of great public interest and should therefore be reviewed by the Supreme Court of Florida pursuant to Art. V, Sec. 3(b)(3) of the Constitution of the State of Florida.
#### Harvey Bruce ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. P-420.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 27, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>                   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                           EXTRACTED FROM THE COASTAL CORPORATION FORM 10-Q
                           QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
                           AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                           FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         83
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                   597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,141
<PP&E>                                     12,364
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             13,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,122
<BONDS>                                     4,377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         400
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                       73
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               13,151
<SALES>                                     3,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3,657
<CGS>                                       2,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               319
<INCOME-TAX>                                   91
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           228
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  228
<EPS-BASIC>                                1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.05


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,654]


Webster Lens Company, Webster, Massachusetts, Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reopening

    On August 8, 1997, the Department issued a Negative Determination 
Regarding Eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, 
applicable to workers and former workers of Webster Lens Company 
located in Webster, Massachusetts. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on August 8,1997 (62 FR 48887).
    By letter of August 14, 1997, Mr. Mauno A. Petajasoja, a 
petitioner, requested administrative reconsideration regarding the 
Department's denial of trade adjustment assistance for workers of the 
subject firm. Workers at the subject firm were engaged in employment 
related to the production of eyeglass lenses. The workers are not 
separately identifiable by product line.
    New information provided by Webster Lens Company and one of its 
suppliers shows that company was purchasing through a broker eyeglass 
lenses which were manufactured overseas and being imported into the 
U.S.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reopening, 
I conclude that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with eyeglass lenses contributed importantly to the 
declines in sales or production and to the total or partial separation 
of workers of Webster Lens Company, Webster, Massachusetts. In 
accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following 
certification:

    All workers of Webster Lens Company of Webster, Massachusetts 
engaged in employment related to the production of eyeglass lenses, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after June 24, 1996 are eligible to apply for worker adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1976.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of October 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-29216 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Rondale Mack KRUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-38.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Yisrael Gottlieb  the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer, Secretary  and Director of Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp , certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: March 17, 2011
Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp .By:
/s/ Yisrael GottliebName:  Yisrael Gottlieb

Title:    Principal Accounting and Financial Officer, Secretary and Director





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 TO CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Varian, Inc. for the
period ended March 28, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this certification (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 to Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Varian, Inc.



Dated:    May 8, 2003



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ALLEN J.
LAUER                                                        
|Allen J. Lauer Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Varian, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60691-60692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29658]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Dependency Statements; 
DFAS-DE Form 1865, 1866 1867, and 1868; OMB Number 0730-[to be 
determined].

[[Page 60692]]

    Type of Request: New Collection;
    Number of Respondents: 4,200.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Response: 4,200.
    Average Burden Per Response: 2 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 8,400.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection is used to certify 
dependency or obtain information to determine entitlement to basic 
allowance for quarters (BAQ) with-dependent rate, travel allowances, or 
Uniformed Services Identification and Privilege Card. Information 
regarding a child born out-of-wedlock (DFAS-DE Form 1865), a full-time 
student 21-22 years of age (DFAS-DE Form 1867), a parent (DFAS-DE Form 
1868), or incapacitated child over age 21 (DFAS-DE Form 1866), is 
provided by the military member or by another individual who may be a 
member of the public. DoDFMR 7000.14, Vol. 17A, defines dependency and 
directs that dependency be proven. Dependency claim examiners use the 
information from the forms to determine the degree of benefits. The 
requirement to provide the information decreases the possibility of 
monetary allowances being approved on behalf of ineligible dependents.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion; annually.
    Respondents's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: November 5, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-29658 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Bernard L. GARMIRE, Chief of Police, City of Miami, Florida, Relator, v. John RED LAKE, Judge, Civil Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-863.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. *4,*1972.

Alan H. Rothstein, City Atty., and S. R. Sterbenz, Asst. City Atty., for relator.

Law Offices of Engel & Halpern and John A. Boccabella and Barry L. Halpern, Miami, for respondent.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on August 10, 1971 (252 So. 2d 605) dismissing without prejudice a Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition to the Civil Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed June 14, 1972 (Garmire v. Red Lake, 265 So.2d 2) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings in accordance with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Now, Therefore, It is Ordered that the judgment of this court issued in this cause on August 10, 1971 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is made the opinion and judgment of this court and the Writ of Prohibition sought by the relator is hereby issued and made absolute in that certain matter pending in the Civil Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, under Clerk’s file # 70-8237. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the Civil Court of Record (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906**

** OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred      |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Charles                N. Eldred          |
|                                |   | Senior                Vice President, and |
|                                |   | Chief                Financial Officer    |
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Product Data Integration Technologies, Inc.

d/b/a Modulant )

) ASBCA Nos. 63683, 63692, 63693

63694

)

Under Contract No. N00178

- 15

- D

- 8374

T.O. N65236

- 17

- F

- 3098 )

)

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Jason W. Moy, Esq.

John J. O ’ Brien, Esq.

Cordatis LLP

Arlington, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Stephanie Beaty, Esq.

Harold W. Askins, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

Hanahan, SC

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The appeals have been withdrawn. Accordingly, they are dismissed from the

Board’s docket with prejudice.

Dated: May 8, 2024

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63683, 63692, 63693,

63694

, Appeals of Product Data Integration Technologies, Inc. , rendered in

conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 8, 2024

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Anthony Joseph CUCCO, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-888.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 23, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                              EXHIBIT NUMBER 13(2)

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
                          OF CHINA ENTERPRISES LIMITED

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of China Enterprises Limited, a Bermuda company (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 28, 2006


                                        /s/ Chow Chun Man, Jimmy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        CHOW CHUN MAN, JIMMY
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed
as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or
the certifying officer.
Exhibit 32     CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedCell Power Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelly Fielder, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Kelly Fielder _____________________________________ Kelly Fielder Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer  March 15, 2007
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   November                8, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Jeffry E. Sterba    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                   |   | Jeffry                E. Sterba        |
|                                                   |   | Chairman,                President and |
|                                                   |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                                   |   | PNM                Resources, Inc.     |

----
#### KNOB CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, and Planet Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Appellants, v. The CITY OF DUNEDIN, Florida, for the use and benefit of Bur Lo, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-841.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Thomas V. Kiernan of Kiernan & Reams, St. Petersburg, for appellant Knob Const. Co., Inc.

Frank C. Logan of McMullen, Everett, Logan, Marquardt & Cline, Clearwater, for appellee.

This case at first gave us pause, but after having carefully considered the oral arguments and briefs of the parties, and having meticulously reviewed the record herein, we conclude that no reversible error has been made to appear. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.