alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
        32.02**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial
        Corp.
        (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
        Salek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
        18
        U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 By:
        /s/
        William Salek
 Name:
        William Salek
 Chief Financial Officer
 Date: May 21, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61834-61835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis in Mathematical 
Sciences (1204).
    Date and Time: December 15-17, 1997; 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Rooms 310, 320 & 330, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Drs. Keith N. Crank, James Gentle, James 
Davenport, and Javier Rojo Program Directors, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 
(703) 306-1870.

[[Page 61835]]

    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice to Program Officers 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals for the Statistics and 
Probability Program as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: November 14, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-30363 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30124]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM


Notice of Publication of Federal Telecommunication Recommendation

AGENCY: National Communications System (NCS).

ACTION: Notice of publication.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Federal Telecommunications Recommendation (FTR) 1080-1997, 
``Video Teleconferencing Services at 56 to 1,920 kbit/s'' was approved 
for publication on October 30, 1997. This recommendation defines the 
specifications for video teleconferencing and video telephony systems.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Stephen Perschau at telephone 
(703) 607-6198 or write to the National Communications System, Attn: 
N6, 701 South Court House Road, Arlington, VA 22204-2198.
Dennis Bodson,
Chief, Technology and Standards Division.
[FR Doc. 97-30124 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-03-M
trtc_ex1041.htm

EXHIBIT 10.41

 


	

	
 
	
Fidelity National Title Company

555 S. Flower Street, Suite 4420, Los Angeles, CA 90071

Phone: (213) 452-7100 · Fax:




 

ADDITION AND/OR AMENDMENT TO ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS

 


	
To:
	
 
	
Fidelity National Title Company

	
Date:
	
 
	
December 6, 2017

	
Escrow No.:
	
 
	
30002753002JA

	
Property Address:
	
 
	
620 East Dyer Street, Santa Ana, CA 92705




 

The Instructions in this escrow are hereby modified, amended and/or supplemented in the following particulars only:

 

Subject to acceptance hereof by the Seller and Assignee, the Buyer hereby assigns 620 Dyer LLC, a California limited liability company the following:

 

1. All interest in and to, and all right to acquire title to, the property which is the subject of this escrow.

2. All funds now on deposit to the account of the undersigned in this escrow.

 

You are instructed to accept all further instructions in this escrow from said Assignee as "New Buyer". No consideration is to be paid to the undersigned Buyer through this escrow for or on account of this Assignment. The undersigned Buyer, Seller and Assignee (as "New Buyer") agree, with respect to the Escrow Instructions dated October 18, 2017, as follows:

 

A. Seller releases original Buyer from all claims and demands against Buyer with respect to the Escrow Instructions, and agrees with Assignee to be bound by the terms of the Escrow Instructions in all respects, as if Assignee was originally named therein as a party in place of Buyer.

B. Assignee agrees to perform in accordance with the Escrow Instructions and to be bound by all the terms thereof, in all respects, as if he/she were the original party to the Escrow Instructions in place of Buyer.

 

All other terms and conditions remain the same.

 


	
ASSIGNOR:

 

Modernize, Inc.,

a California corporation
	
 
	
ASSIGNEE:

 

620 Dyer LLC,

a California limited liability company
	
 

	
 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
By:
		 	
By:
	/s/ Derek Peterson	 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Name:
		 	
Name:
	Derek Peterson	 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Title:
		 	
Title:
	CEO	 



 


	 
	
1

	

 
	 



 


	
SELLER:

 

620 E. DYER, LLC,

a California limited liability company
	
	 	 	 
	By:		
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Name:
		 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	Title:		 



 

 


	
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 

April 22, 2011 

Ms. Janice K. Uhlig 

Executive Director, Global Compensation and Planning 

General Motors Company 

300 Renaissance Drive 

Detroit, MI 48265-3000 

Re: Compensation Payments and Structure for GM “Top 25” Employee 

Dear Ms. Uhlig: 

Pursuant to the Department of the Treasury’s Interim Final Rule on TARP Standards for 

Compensation and Corporate Governance (the “Rule”),1

 on April 1, 2011, the Office of the 

Special Master issued a determination letter (the “2011 Determination Letter”) to General 

Motors Company (“GM”), with respect to 2011 compensation payments and structures for GM’s 

“top 25” executive officers and most highly compensated employees. 31 C.F.R. § 30.16(a)(3)(i). 

Following receipt of the 2011 Determination Letter, GM requested a change in the 

approved amounts of stock salary and long-term restricted stock for a particular employee. The 

proposed change would somewhat increase the employee’s total direct compensation, but would 

not increase it over the employee’s compensation for the prior year. In light of the particular 

facts as communicated by GM with respect to such employee’s situation, performance and 

compensation history, and as previously discussed with you, the Office of the Special Master has 

approved this request. Accordingly, Exhibit I to the 2011 Determination Letter is hereby 

amended as follows: 

Employee ID Cash Salary Stock Salary

Long-Term 

Restricted Stock

Total Direct 

Compensation

0135 $500,000 $750,000 $519,500 $1,769,500 

 

The approval in this letter applies only to the employee referenced above. Such 

conclusion is limited to the authority vested in the Office of the Special Master by Section 

 

1

 The Interim Final Rule and all determination letters issued by the Office of the Special Master are available at 

www.financialstability.gov (click on “About Financial Stability”, then click on “Plan”, then scroll down to the 

second-to-last link and click on “Executive Compensation Guidance”). 
30. 16(a)(3) of the Rule, and shall not constitute, or be construed to constitute, the judgment of 

the Office of the Special Master or the Department of the Treasury with respect to the 

compliance of the proposed compensation payments or structure or any other compensation 

payments or structure for the subject employee with any other provision of the Rule. Moreover, 

my evaluations and conclusions with respect to this employee have relied upon, and are qualified 

in their entirety by, the accuracy of the materials submitted by GM to the Office ofthe Special 

Master, and the absence of any material misstatement or omission in such materials. 

Very truly yours, 

~ Patricia Geoghegan 

Office of the Special aster 

for TARP Executive Compensation 

cc: Mary T. Barra 

2
# L_2005333EN.01003601.xml

| 20.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/36

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2087/2005

of 19 December 2005

determining the extent to which applications lodged in December 2005 for import licences for certain poultrymeat sector products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2497/96 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2497/96 of 18 December 1996 laying down rules for the application in the poultrymeat sector of the system provided for by the Association Agreement and the Interim Agreement between the European Community and the State of Israel (1), and in particular Article 4(5) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006 are greater than the quantities available and must therefore be reduced by a fixed percentage to ensure a fair distribution,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 January to 31 March 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2497/96 shall be met as referred to in the Annex.

2.   Application for import licences for the period 1 April to 30 June 2006 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2497/96 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 338, 28.12.1996, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 361/2004 (OJ L 63, 28.2.2004, p. 15).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period of 1 January to 31 March 2006 | Total quantity available for the period of 1 April to 30 June 2006
  (t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| I1 | 4,336409 | 381,50 |
| I2 | 100,0 | 136,25 |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period of 1 January to 31 March 2006

Total quantity available for the period of 1 April to 30 June 2006

(t)

I1

4,336409

381,50

I2

100,0

136,25

---
#### Billy Ray LAYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 46300.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 29, 1971.

Nat W. Bullard, Vicksburg, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Velia Ann Mayer, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
The ncua.gov web site makes heavy use of Java script and Teleport Pro was unable to to recreate the functionality of the site. The NCUA Report Newsletter can be found in the following folders:

W:\netsite-docs\gpo232\gpo232\www.ncua.gov\News\Documents
W:\netsite-docs\gpo232\NCUA Report 2011 - 2013
#### Harvey V. DELZER, Walter B. Krysher, Daniel N. Martin and Charles G. Edwards, Appellants, v. John E. BEIER, William E. Beier, Sr. and William E. Beier, Jr., as Trustees of the William E. Beier Life Insurance Trust and John Kruty and Mildred Kruty, his wife, and 409 Building, Inc., Appellees.

No. 70-896.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 19, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
April 29, 2015 

Dear DOT: ._·,_ 

I am writing this letter concerning the air service we are currently receiving here in Page, 

Arizona. Contrary to our city councils recommendation to keep Great Lakes Airline, there are 

many of us here in Page that would like to see a new air service come to our remote location. 

The air service is so undependable (I understand the pilot shortage) our businesses don't even 

use the airline. Many of us drive to Phoenix or Las Vegas in order to fly to our destination. This 

is a 600 mile round trip plus motel and food expenses. 

Last year I flew out to Wichita, Ks. My flight was cancelled for Thursday so I had to fly out a day 

early. That was not a big deal. I got to spend extra time with family. However, this year was a 

whole different story. 

Flying Page to Phoenix in March, I double even tripled checked my flight status a week in 

advance, 4 days in advance and the day before twice, once in the AM and once at 5:00PM. 

was assured every time my flight was scheduled. At 6:00PM I get a phone call that my 

Thursday AM flight was cancelled. I already had confirmed and printed out my boarding pass 

with my connecting flight in Phoenix to Atlanta, GA. My husband and I drove to Flagstaff at 

7:00 PM (130 miles) and spent the night in Flagstaff so I could get to Phoenix and catch my 

flight. That 150 mile (by land) flight cost us an additional $393.98. The flight from Phoenix to 

Atlanta was $412.20 round trip! 

NOPE! Not the end of this story. My flight from Phoenix to Page with Great Lakes was cancelled 

coming back. For an additional $85.40 fee for changing my flight with Southwest, I did make it 

home. 

Great Lakes Airline cost me $479.38 more than I should have had to spend. They did credit me 

$77.60 for the one way to Phoenix. 

The city council is concerned with flights only being 9 passenger but the flight from Phoenix to 

Page was a 9 passenger plane. 

In short we really need a reliable air service here in our small town. 

Sincerely, 

Mrs. DeAnna Zimmer
# Hogan Lovells

January24, 2014 Susan Kurland 

# [)oT-osT-:J.ooo-7 18**~**

Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 +1.202.637.5600 Tel +1.202.637.5910 Fax Robert E. Cohn, Partner 202.637.4999 robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and InternationalAffairs U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Re: RepublicAirline'sAir-21 "Within-Perimeter" DCA Slot Exemptions Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182 DearAssistant Secretary Kurland: RepublicAirline Inc. hereby notifies the Department that effective February 1, 2014, it is turning back to the Department two Air-21 slot exemptions issued to Republic by DOT Order 2012-3-8. Republic currently uses these two slot exemptions for nonstop service to/from Kansas City on behalf of FrontierAirlines. Frontier has been sold, and it has advised Republic that it will not continue Frontier-branded service between DCA and Kansas City after February 1, 2014. In these circumstances, and without prejudice to the long-term disposition ofthe slots by the Department, Republic would not object to the grant of pendente lite authority to another carrierto continue service.

cc: Bryan Bedford Ethan Blank

\\DC- 040601/000001 -5328421 v2 Respectfully submitted,

# {ldf~u___. Robert E. Cohn Patrick 

### R. Rizzi Counsel for RepublicAirline Inc.
#### Willie C. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1002.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61488-61489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


XCS-56 Plowed Terrace Demonstration Project, Cameron and 
Calcasieu Parishes, LA

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.


[[Page 61489]]


ACTION: Notice of a finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Guidelines (40 
CFR Part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Guidelines (7 CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Plowed 
Terrace Demonstration Project, Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, 
Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald W. Gohmert, State Conservationist, Natural Resources 
Conservation Service, 3737 Government Street, Alexandria, Louisiana 
71302; telephone (318) 473-7751.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of the 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Donald W. Gohmert, State Conservationist, 
has determined that the preparation and review of an environmental 
impact statement is not needed for this project.
    This is a demonstration project and will evaluate potential impacts 
attributed to plowed terraces and vegetative plantings to be installed 
in shallow open water areas. The project area includes approximately 
3,250 acres of open water and fragmented marsh. Project features 
include the construction of approximately 54,000 linear feet of earthen 
terraces followed by the planting of vegetation on the side slopes of 
the terraces.
    The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
federal, state, and local agencies and interested parties. A limited 
number of copies of the FONSI are available to fill single copy 
requests at the above address. Basic data developed during the 
environmental assessment are on file and may be reviewed by contacting 
Donald W. Gohmert.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.
Donald W. Gohmert,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 97-30166 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
#### STATE of Florida v. Wilbur DIXON.

No. 39195.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 740.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-64]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 11, 2012; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: January 3, 2012.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-64 Filed 1-3-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Spicer, Gary" <Gary.Spicer@luminant.com> Date: 7/21/2010 1:48 PM Subject: Extension Request for Luminant Generation Company Attachments: pic09647.gif; 2010-07-06 Luminant Power request for extension.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following Luminant Generation Company facilities:

Big Brown Steam Electric Station Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Lake Creek Steam Electric Station Lake Hubbard Steam Electric Station Martin Lake Steam Electric Station Monticello Stea m Electric Station Morgan Creek Steam Electric Station Oak Grove Steam Electric Station Sandow Steam Electric Station Trinidad Steam Electric Station TXU Sweetwater Generating Plant

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 and Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. No extensions are granted for Version 4 of the questionnaire; the deadline for plants receiving this questionnaire remains 90 days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic09647.gif)

From: "Spicer, Gary" <Gary.Spicer@luminant.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/06/2010 02:17 PM

Subject:Dear Ms Alicea,

Attached please find Luminant Power’s request for an extension for response to the Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines for its eleven recipient plants. If you have any questions, please contact Gary Spicer at 214-875-8299 (office), 214-973-6150 (mobile) or via e-mail at spicer@luminant.com .

Also, please respond to this e-mail as a method of confirming that you have received it.

(See attached file: 2010-07-06 Luminant Power request for extension.pdf)
#### HAUGHTON ELEVATOR DIVISION, RELIANCE ELECTRIC CORP. v. STATE of Louisiana, Through DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION.

No. 62649.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Haughton Elevator Division, Reliance Electric Co., applying for certiorari, *577or writ of review, to the'Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 359 So.2d 693.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-148288, 333-131392, 333-128316, 333-126591, 333-118821, 333-112209, 333-106873, 333-103257, 333-90458 and 333-70134) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-146078,333-134981, 333-126590, 333-115747, 333-108563, 333-103055, 333-101276, 333-96313, 333-91471, 333-68172, 333-68170, 333-53089, 333-53087, 333-41663, 333-39194, 333-08978 and 333-154839) of ARCA biopharma, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of ourreport dated March 25, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ARCA biopharma, Inc. (formerly known as Nuvelo, Inc.) included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Palo Alto,California 

March 25, 2009