alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                CERTIFICATION


I, Garrett Sullivan certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cognitronics
Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
   that material information relating to the registrant,
   including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
   by others within those entities, particularly during the
   period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
   controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
   the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
   Date"); and
   c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
   the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
   based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
   internal controls which could adversely affect the
   registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
   financial data and have identified for the registrant's
   auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
   management or other employees who have a significant role in
   the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: August 14, 2003



/s/ Garrett Sullivan
Garrett Sullivan
Chief Financial Officer
#### Vincent Anthony CIRAOLO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 77-1098.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1978.

McCain & Saccocio, Ft. Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition denied.

CROSS, DOWNEY and MOORE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Theodore A. Babcock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|/s/ Theodore A. Babcock                                      
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|Theodore A. Babcock Chief Financial Officer November 12, 2003
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0216. JAMES J. ADAMS v. GLENDA P. ADAMS.

On December 9, 2021, the trial court entered an order finding James J. Adams

in contempt for failing to meet certain obligations under the parties’ divorce decree.

On January 11, 2022, James Adamsfiled this application for discretionary appeal. We

lack jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). “The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept an

application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.” Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.

App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). See also Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 82 (2) (a)

(720 SE2d 170) (2011) (noting that this Court “has held that the failure to meet the

statutory deadline for filing a discretionary application is a jurisdictional defect”).

James Adams filed this application 33 days after entry of the order he wishes to

appeal. Thus, the application is untimely, and it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 24, 2022

01/24/2022
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Metro-Rural Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sio Kam Seng, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 31, 2015



|       |  |                                                           
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ Sio Kam Seng                                          
|Name:  |  | Sio Kam Seng                                              
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### Manuel Francis DENNIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-359.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 D0 21 6 . J AMES J . ADAMS v . GLENDA P. ADAMS.

On Decem

b er 9

, 2 0 2 1, t h e t ri al co u rt en tered an o rd er fi n di n g J am es J

. Ad am s

i n co nt em p t fo r fai l i n g t o m eet cert ai n ob l i g at i o n s u n d er t h e p art i es ’ d i vo rce d ecree.

On J an u ary 1 1

, 2 0 2 2, J am es Ad am s fi l ed t hi s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

. W e

l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. An ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i scret i o n ary ap p eal m u st b e fi l ed wi th i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry

o f t h e j u d g m en t o r tri al co urt o rd er s o u g h t t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (d ). “ Th e

req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o nal a n d t h i s co u rt can n ot accep t an

ap p li cat io n fo r ap p e a l n o t m ad e i n co m p l i an ce t h erewi t h .” Bo

yl e v. S t a t e , 1 9 0 Ga.
Ap p

. 73 4

, 7 3 4 (3 80 SE2 d 57 ) (1 9 8 9 ). See al s o Ga b l e v. S t a t e , 2 90 Ga. 8 1

, 8 2 (2 ) (a)
(7 2 0 SE2 d 1 7 0 ) (2 0 1 1 ) (n o t i n g t h at t h i s Co u rt “ h as h el d t h at t h e fai lu re t o m eet t h e

s t at u to ry d ead l i n e fo r fi li n g a d i s cret i o n ary ap p li cat i o n is a ju ri sd i ct i o n al d e f e c t ” ).

J am es A d am s fi l ed t h is ap p l i cat i o n 3 3 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e ord er h e wi s h es to

ap p eal

. Th u s , t h e ap p l icat i o n i s u n t i m el y , an d i t i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f
ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.
W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 24, 2022

01/24/2022
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: September 15, 2016 D-54-16 

 

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

YOUNG HAM,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 4111621)

 

Calendar Date: March 28, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rose and Mulvey, JJ.

 

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

Young Ham, Los Angeles, California, respondent pro se.

 

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

2003, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014

for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements

of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he

has complied with the attorney registration requirements of

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of

the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 118. Petitioner does not object to
-2- D-54-16

respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rose and Mulvey, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
# DICKINSO NCOUNTY

BOAR D O FCOMMISSIONER S

Boar dChairman : Henry Wende r Vic e Chairman : Fran k

Smit h Commissioners : Joh nDegenaer , Jr .

An nMarti n Jo e Steven s Controller!Administrator : KathrynPasco e Administrativ e Assistant : Sony aPug h Dickinso nCounty i s a nEqua l Opportunit y Employe r

Apri l 26 , 201 0

C. 3 Denni s J
. Devan y Chief , Essentia l Ai rServic e Division , X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Roo m 640 1 40 0 Sevent h Street , S.W
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 RE : Dickinso n County , M l For d Airpor t Dea rMr
. DeVany : A t th e regula rmeetin g o f th e Dickinso n Count yBoar d o f Commissioner s hel d Apri l 26 , 2010 , th e Boar d supporte d th e bi d o f Mesab a Aviation , Inc
. d/b/a Delt a Connection , Optio n #3 , includin g th e enhance d servic e patter n a s detaile d i n thei rproposa l submitte d Marc h 26 , 2010
. Dickinso n Count ybelieve s tha t th e reliabilit yan d consistenc yshow n b yMesab a ove rth e pas t tw o year s warrant s thei rcontinuatio n a s th e EA S carrie rfo rthi s area . Further , th e acces s t o majo r hub s an d th e convenienc e o f single-carrie rconnection s i s a n asse t t o thi s community
. Than k yo u fo rpermittin g u s th e opportunit yt o commen t o n thi s matter , whic h i s vitall yimportan t t o thi s area . Sincerely , DICKINSO N COUNT YBOAR D O F COMMISSIONER S
HenryWender , Chairma n

Courthouse , P.O . Bo x 609 , Iro nMountain , Michiga n4980 1 • Phone : 906.774.257 3 • Fax : 906.774.368 6
### SO2 COS by Month

**Process Data Units**  **January February** **March Quarterly** **April May**  **June Quarterly**  **July August** **September Quarterly** **October November** **December Quarterly**  **YTD**
**Aluminum Production** lbs 24,293,49621,655,31424,540,20170,489,01123,143,00424,460,90623,683,53971,287,44924,076,96823,526,29023,249,32970,852,58724,705,96024,106,43324,807,39673,619,789**286,248,836**


### Aluminum Production tons 12,147 10,828 12,270 35,245 11,572 12,230 11,842 35,644 12,038 11,763 11,625 35,426 12,353 12,053 12,404 36,810 **143,124** 

### Green Anode Production MT 5,669 5,991 7,516 19,176 6,056 6,222 7,163 19,441 4,744 6,859 6,973 18,576 5,756 6,324 6,477 18,557 **75,750** 

### Green Anode Production tons 6,249 6,604 8,285 21,138 6,676 6,859 7,896 21,430 5,229 7,561 7,686 20,477 6,345 6,971 7,140 20,456 **83,500** 

### Baked Anode Production MT 5,849 5,596 6,186 

### 17,631 6,404 6,630 6,322 

### 19,356 5,962 5,921 6,225 

### 18,108 6,258 5,679 5,977 17,914 **73,009** 

### Baked Anode Production tons 6,447 6,169 6,819 19,435 7,059 7,308 6,969 21,336 6,572 6,527 6,862 19,961 6,898 6,260 6,589 19,747 **80,479** 

### %S**in Baked Anodes** % 1.95 1.84 2.15 2.19 2.18 2.17 2.20 2.23 2.21 2.22 2.20 2.18 2.14 

### %S**in Reacted Aluminum** % 0.441 0.365 0.382 0.371 0.374 0.338 0.410 0.366 0.396 0.379 0.417 0.426 0.389 

### Pots Operating No. 193.2 193.0 195.0 191.5 194.1 193.5 191.7 190.9 192.8 196.8 197.2 196.6 193.857 

### Net Carbon lb carbon/lb Al 0.421 0.413 0.403 0.409 0.416 0.424 0.412 0.425 0.419 0.417 0.413 0.413 0.415 

### Al2O3 Feed Rate ton/hr 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.000 

### %**S converted to SO2** 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 0.908 

### %**S converted to COS** 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 

### SO2 from carbon lb/ton 29.82 27.60 31.47 32.53 32.94 33.42 32.92 34.42 33.63 33.62 33.00 32.70 32.339 

### SO2 from Al2O3 lb/ton 1.080 0.906 0.927 0.923 0.910 0.822 0.981 0.926 0.981 0.913 0.996 1.022 0.949 

### Total SO2: lb/ton 30.90 28.51 32.40 33.46 33.85 34.24 33.90 35.35 34.61 34.54 34.00 33.72 33.288 

### 98% through A-398's lb/yr 367,797 302,485 389,552 379,388 405,696 397,345 399,958 407,490 394,318 418,089 401,575 409,917 4,673,610 

### 2% through monitor lb/yr 7,506 6,173 7,950 7,743 8,280 8,109 8,162 8,316 8,047 8,532 8,195 8,366 95,380 

### Total SO2: lb SO2 375,303 308,658 397,502 1,081,462387,131 413,975 405,454 1,206,561 408,120 415,806 402,365 1,226,292426,622 409,770 418,2831,254,675 **4,768,990** 

### Total COS: lb/ton 2.83 2.62 2.99 3.09 3.13 3.17 3.13 3.27 3.19 3.19 3.13 3.11 37 

### 98% through A-398's lb/yr 33,715 27,819 35,945 35,043 37,501 36,837 36,892 37,693 36,394 38,664 37,027 37,757 431,288 

### 2% through monitor lb/yr 688 568 734 715 765 752 753 769 743 789 756 771 8,802 

### Total COS: lb COS 34,403 28,387 36,678 35,758 38,266 37,589 37,645 38,462 37,137 39,453 37,783 38,528 **440,090**



### Estimated as no data available.

# 2010 ALCOA MASSENA WEST PLANT - SULFUR DIOXIDE AND COS EMISSIONS BY MONTH

0900006480f6eb1d.xls 3:39 PM 11/17/2011
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30267]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2988]

Louisiana; (and Contiguous County in Texas)

    Beauregard Parish and the contiguous parishes of Allen, Calcasieu, 
Jefferson Davis, and Vernon State of Louisiana; and Newton County in 
Texas constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused by 
severe thunderstorms, rain, and tornadoes which occurred on October 23-
24, 1997. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of 
this disaster may be filed until the close of business on January 12, 
1998 and for economic injury until the close of business on August 10, 
1998 at the address listed below U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 102, Ft. Worth, 
TX 76155.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere................       7.625
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere.............       3.812
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere................       8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere......................................       4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere......................................       7.125
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere...............................       4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The numbers assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 298812 
and for Louisiana; and 298912 for Texas. For economic injury the 
numbers are 966900 for Texas.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-30267 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P-M
```
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Geoffrey F. Feidelberg, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CompuDyne Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I,  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's   auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  registrant's  board  of
directors:

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

         Date:  November 14, 2006
                                            /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            --------------------------
                                            Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                       39
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-147-006]


High Island Offshore System; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 5, 1997, High Island Offshore System 
(HIOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective 
November 1, 1997:

Sub Fifth Revised Sheet No. 110
Sub First Revised Sheet No. 110A
Sub Second Revised Sheet No. 110B
Sub Original Sheet No. 110C

    HIOS asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's October 28, 1997, letter order in the captioned proceeding 
regarding Order No. 587-C. The above mentioned letter order indicated 
that a number of the standards did not reflect the correct version 
number set forth in section 204.10(b) of the regulations, with 
exception of the Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 308.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference 
Room.
Lois D. Cashell,


Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97-30077 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M