alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4. The New Subsidiary hereby represents and warrants to the Administrative Agent and theLenders that:(a) The New Subsidiary’s exact legal name and state of formation are as set forth onthe signature pages hereto.(b) The New Subsidiary’s taxpayer identification number and organization number are setforth on Schedule 1 hereto.(c) Other than as set forth on Schedule 2 hereto, the New Subsidiary has notchanged its legal name, changed its state of formation, been party to a merger,consolidation or other change in structure in the five years preceding the date hereof.(d) Schedule 3 hereto includes all of the IP Rights registered or pendingregistration with the United States Copyright Office or the United States Patent andTrademark Office and owned by the New Subsidiary as of the date hereof. None of the IPRights of the New Subsidiary set forth in Schedule 3 hereto is subject to anylicensing agreement or similar arrangement, except as set forth on Schedule 3hereto.(e) Schedule 4 hereto includes all Commercial Tort Claims asserted in anyjudicial action before any Governmental Authority by or in favor of the New Subsidiary as ofthe date hereof.(f) Schedule 5 hereto lists all real property located in the United States thatis owned or leased by the New Subsidiary as of the date hereof.(g) Schedule 6 hereto lists each Subsidiary of the New Subsidiary, togetherwith (i) jurisdiction of formation, (ii) number of shares of each class of Equity Interestsoutstanding, (iii) the certificate number(s) of the certificates evidencing such EquityInterests and number and percentage of outstanding shares of each class owned by the NewSubsidiary (directly or indirectly) of such Equity Interests and (iv) number and effect, ifexercised, of all outstanding options, warrants, rights of conversion or purchase and allother similar rights with respect thereto.5. The address of the New Subsidiary for purposes of all notices and other communications isthe address designated for all Loan Parties on Schedule 11.02 to the Credit Agreement orsuch other address as the New Subsidiary may from time to time notify the Administrative Agent inwriting.6. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute anoriginal but all of which when taken together shall constitute one contract.7. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THELAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
 
 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the New Subsidiary has caused this Joinder Agreement to be duly executedby its authorized officer, and the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the holders of theObligations, has caused the same to be accepted by its authorized officer, as of the day and yearfirst above written.      IARCHIVES, INC.,
Exhibit 99.1
 Schedule I Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
 ARCHIPELAGO LEARNING, INC.
 BALANCE SHEET
 As ofDecember 31,2009(in thousands)AssetsCash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    48,655Receivable from subsidiary
    
    
    16Note receivable from subsidiary
    
    
    25,650Investment in subsidiaries
    
    
    13,184Total assets
    
    $
    87,505Liabilities and EquityTax payable
    
    $
    540Due to subsidiary
    
    
    3,955Total liabilities
    
    
    4,495Commitments and contingenciesStockholders Equity:Preferred stock ($0.001 par value,
10,000,000 shares authorized, none
issued and outstanding at December 31,
2009 and 2008)
    
    
    Common stock ($0.001 par value,
200,000,000 shares authorized,
25,110,255 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2009 and no
shares authorized, issued or
outstanding at December 31, 2008)
    
    
    25Additional paid-in capital
    
    
    76,072Retained earnings
    
    
    6,913Total stockholders equity
    
    
    83,010Total liabilities and equity
    
    $
    87,505




---



##### 



STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
 For the period from inception at August4, 2009 through December 31, 2009(in thousands)Interest income
    
    $
    25Loss on Investment in Subsidiaries
    
    
    (1,106
    )Net loss
    
    $
    (1,081
    )
 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 For the periodfrom inception atAugust 4, 2009through December31, 2009(in thousands)Cash flows from operating activitiesNet loss
    
    $
    (1,081
    )Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Investment in subsidiaries
    
    
    1,090Net cash provided by operating activities
    
    
    9Cash flows from investing activitiesNet cash used in investing activities
    
    
    Cash flows from financing activitiesContribution from member in Reorganization
    
    
    693Stock offering
    
    
    47,953Net cash provided by  financing activities
    
    
    48,646Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    48,655Beginning of period
    
    
    End of period
    
    $
    48,655
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS FILED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,705
<INVENTORY>                                    245,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               535,405
<PP&E>                                         285,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,064,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          269,284
<BONDS>                                        479,446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           534
<OTHER-SE>                                     248,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,064,741
<SALES>                                        927,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               931,412
<CGS>                                          678,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  678,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,917
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,087
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,741
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  The undersigned, Garrett Sullivan, the Treasurer of
  Cognitronics Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this
  certification in connection with the filing with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on
  Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005  (the "Report").
  The undersigned hereby certifies that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
      of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.



DATED this 15 day
of August, 2005


                                      /s/ Garrrett Sullivan
                                          Garrett Sullivan
                                        Treasurer


                                 A signed original of this written
                                 statement required by Section 906
                                 has been provided to the Company and
                                 will be retained by the Company and
                                 furnished to the Securities and
                                 Exchange Commission or its staff
                                 upon request.
**Exhibit 31.A**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Douglas L. Foshee, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of El Paso CGP Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisReport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: November 10, 2005         /s/Douglas L. Foshee   Douglas L. Foshee   President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)El Paso CGP Company
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7767** 

NORMAN L. MAYES , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States Distric t Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Benson Everett Legg , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00085

- BEL )

Submitted : April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Norman L . Mayes, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Norman Lindsey Mayes s eeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and his motion for reconsideration and the motion to alter or amend . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S . 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional rig ht. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mayes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSE D
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-373-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

November 6, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on November 19, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement 
of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Edith A. Gilmore at (202) 208-
2158 or Sandra J. Delude at (202) 208-0583.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29816 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the undersigned, David P. Hanlon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Empire
Resorts,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2005 of the Company
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

March 30, 2006

By:   /s/ David P. Hanlon
      ------------------------
      David P. Hanlon
      Chief Executive Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-153-008]


Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc., Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

November 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 3, 1997, Granite State Gas 
Transmission, Inc. (Granite State) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets 
listed below, to become effective November 1, 1997:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 215
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 289

    Grante State Asserts that the tariff sheets are in compliance with 
the Director letter order issued in this proceeding on October 30, 
1997. Further Granite State asserts that, it has submitted prior tariff 
filings with the Commission adopting and making effective as of 
November 1, 1997 certain Gas Industry Standard Board's (GISB) 
requirements related to Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) and 
Electronic Delivery Mechanism (EDM). Granite State asserts that 
complications and delays have occurred in establishing computer 
capability to implement the GISB EDI/EDM standards and requirements in 
Granite State's operations. Accordingly, Granite State further requests 
an extension until December 31, 1997 to comply with the EDI/EDM 
requirements and the foregoing tariff sheets remove from the tariff 
those requirements until Granite State has the capability to comply 
with them.
    Granite State states that copies of its filing were served on its 
firm and interruptible customers, the regulatory agencies of the states 
of Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, and the intervenor in Docket 
No. RP07-137-000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29810 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### CITY OF CLARKSDALE, Mississippi v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION of Mississippi and Mississippi Power & Light Company.

No. 45496.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 22, 1969.

*606Maynard, Fitzgerald, Maynard & Bradley, Clarksdale, Overstreet & Kuykendall, Jackson, for appellant.

Wise, Carter & Child, Jackson, Holcomb, Curtis & Connell, Clarksdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 306

EX PA R TE D A N I EL PA TR I C K H O W A R D , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US C A U SE N O . F - 0155310- I I N C R I M I N A L D I ST R I C T C O U R T N O . 2

FROM DALLAS CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Te x . Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of capital murde r and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appea ls a ffirme d h i s co n viction. Ho war d

v . S tat e , No. 05-02-01731- CR (Tex. App.–Dallas 2003, no pet.). Applicant conte nds that his appellate counsel re ndere d ineff ec t i v e assistanc e bec ause he fa i l ed t o t i m el y

n o t i fy Ap p l i ca n tt h at h i s co n v i ct i o n h ad b ee n af fi rm ed
. T h e t ri al co u rt m ad e f i n d i n gs of fa c t and c on c lud e d th a t th ro ug h n o f a ult of a pp e llate c ouns e l App lic a nt wa s d e nie d h is r ig ht t o f ile2

a pro se petition for discre tionary revie w. The tria l c ourt rec ommends that relief be g rante d. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discre tionary revie w of the judg ment of the Fifth Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 05-02-01731- CR that aff irmed h i s c o n v i c t i o n i n C a s e N o . F
- 0 1 5 5 3 1 0

- I f r o m C r i m i n a l D i s t r i c t C o u rt N o . 2 o f D a l l a s C o u n t y. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary revie w wit h the Fifth Court of Appea ls within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s other claims are dismiss ed. Ex parte Torres , 943 S.W .2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Deliver ed: Marc h 3, 2010 Do no t pu bli sh
Exhibit








Schedule A to Item 5.02


Changes to Mr. Khoury’s Employment Agreement dated September 18, 2014.


1.      Section 3 (a), Position with the Company: title: Executive Vice President-Administration.
2.      Section 4 (a), Base Salary: $300,000.
3.     Section 4 (b), Annual Performance Bonus: target bonus of 50% of base salary.
# BEMIDJI Regional Airport 3 <~4 , l ober g D NW S uite 1 01 ·: - -. . . err ' l i } l . Ml n ss cta 

### 56601 

### US Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis Essential Air Service Division 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 November 18'\ 2 0 13

...

. .. . ' .. 

### ~ (Attn : Mr . Kevin Adams ) Ref. ( Order 2013-10-2 EAS Proposal LIT, 

### SkyWest Airlines service to Bemidji ) Dear Mr. Adams The Bemidj i Regional Airp ort Authority has reviewed the proposal b y SkyWest Airline s described in y OU! 

### letter of October 24 ' h, 2013 and the actual details in the proposal submitted by the Airline and find it to be satisfactory . From our perspec tive the transition, as describ e d, should be a seamless. The Authority and the community as a whole are looking forward to continuing to work closely with SkyWest to ensure this critical service is successful and to grow thi s market with the goal of this market being self-sustaining and not require subsidy in the future . Thank y ou . Sincerely,



## C : w1 

### Bemidji Regional Airport Authority . ,. . " \ / . / ' . / 

# .-- :: 1 4 1 ; { ()IJJ;c '- - -- I 

### } ' . . John Chattin Manager 

# :#~~0L I
Harold M . Vao Leeuwen.Tr ~ Executive Director Bemidji Regional Airport Authority - I ,, :; / ' - /

/ /J " ' " 0 ' " '

I ~ , f" 

# r: // r ' 

## A ~ . · , 7 ,, ' ( 1 - .. , 1 . " 4 ' < "

_ . L -I -- ' ._ . .. t ,. ' ~ .. . . . . ~

/ t ' " 

### ' . 

# M s . Rita Albrecht May or 

### C ity of Bemidji

:; a . c o - c . H . V r l n : Lc . : e l ! " ' H E :. - ~ , Jr. 3 8 :" l ~ ~ ct: " , rg

Dr. .~ r1 su s c e : - :] ( I f' f l.ce (218) ~" 1 1 - 2 · 1 38 b : ~ ·.. :.:: i ' VB D l

_ ~ ~c tor

~ C : Jl., r- ti..nr> . u:~c: l3 . F ·- (218) ~ ;~ - ; ~ 73 ~ d :i . ?

_ : ~_ L ~ n a l. F-- =-- r : -ve- t r. J . : . ~c :: : . . rI ; ) 6 5 01 Cell (218) 209-9531



### - . . -- -- --