alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1713 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment and Adoption Reform 

Act of 1978 to require a study and report on adoption outcomes and 

the factors affecting those outcomes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. SMUCKER (for himself and Ms. UNDERWOOD) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment and 

Adoption Reform Act of 1978 to require a study and 

report on adoption outcomes and the factors affecting 

those outcomes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON SUCCESSFUL ADOP4 TIONS. 

5 Section 204 of the Child Abuse Prevention and 

6 Treatment and Adoption Reform Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 

7 5114) is amended to read as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1713 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 204. STUDY AND REPORT ON SUCCESSFUL ADOP2 TIONS. 

3 ‘‘(a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a study 

4 (directly or by grant to, or contract with, public or private 

5 nonprofit research agencies or organizations) on adoption 

6 outcomes and the factors (including parental substance 

7 use disorder) affecting those outcomes. 

8 ‘‘(b) REPORT.—Not later than the date that is 36 

9 months after the date of the enactment of the Stronger 

10 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act the Secretary 

11 shall submit a report to Congress that includes the results 

12 of the study required under subsection (a).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50870

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROGELIO F. VILLARREAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

(A-94-CR-136)

______________________________________________

May 22, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rogelio F. Villarreal appeals the denial of his motion to

vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255. Villarreal contends that his trial counsel was ineffective

for (1) agreeing to a total of 240 pounds of marijuana in the

guilty-plea agreement, when Villarreal was involved with only 140

pounds; (2) failing to call the government informant at sentencing,

thereby denying Villarreal the opportunity to confront his accuser;
2

(3) failing to call the informant to testify as to what benefits he

received as a government witness; (4) advising Villarreal to agree

to waive his right to appeal and to proceed in a § 2255 motion; (5)

not contesting the presentence report (PSR) and Villarreal's

ability to pay a fine; (6) failing to object to the two-point

enhancement for Villarreal's leadership role; (7) failing to object

to information in the PSR that the confidential informant's

statement that he had paid Villarreal $50,000 was corroborated by

a trace of money deposited in Villarreal's bank account. Finally,

he contends that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing

to file a direct appeal.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and

conclude Villarreal has failed to show either that counsel's

performance was deficient or that, but for counsel's alleged errors

he would have insisted upon going to trial. Mangum v. Hargett, 67

F.3d 80, 84 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 116 S.Ct.

957 (1996). Further, he has failed to show a reasonable

probability that, but counsel's alleged errors, the result of his

sentencing proceeding would have been different. Accordingly, we

affirm essentially for the reasons given by the district court.

United States v. Villarreal, No. A-95-CA-136 (W.D. Tex., Nov. 15,

1995).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 15.1

|HK office: 7th Floor, Nan Dao Commercial Building, 359-361 Queen’s
        Road Central, Hong Kong
        香港 皇后大道中三五九至三六一號
        南島商業大廈七樓
        Tel : (852) 2851 7954	Fax: (852) 2545 4086
        Kowloon office: Room 2105-06, 21/F., Office Tower, Langham Place,
        8 Argyle Street, Mongkok, Kowloon, Hong Kong
        九龍
        旺角 亞皆老街八號 朗豪坊辦公大樓2105-06室
        Tel: (852) 2780 0607	Fax: (852) 2780 0013
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To
the Board of Directors

China
Ceramics Co., Ltd.



We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement of China Ceramics Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form F-3 (File No. 333-206516)
of our report dated May 15, 2017, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and
2015 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016.







/s/ Centurion ZD CPA Limited



Centurion ZD CPA Limited

Hong Kong, China

May 15, 2017
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Ping
Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of Lianluo Smart Limited (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1. The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this statement this 10th day of February 2020.



| | /s/ Ping Chen                
| | -----------------------------
| | Ping Chen                    
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Lianluo Smart Limited and will be retained by Lianluo Smart Limited and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3167

SANDRA L. HOPKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; DIVISION OF MENTAL

HEALTH SERVICES, DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES, State of North

Carolina,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-334-5-F)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 23, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra L. Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Reed, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting the

employer's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Appellant's

claim filed pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42

U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12117 (West 1996). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Hopkins v. North Carolina, No. CA-95-334-5-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT
        32.01**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial
        Corp.
        (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
        Pagano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
        18
        U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 By:
              /s/
                  William PaganoName:
              William
                  PaganoChief
                  Executive OfficerDate:
              November
                  13, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-8-007]


Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

November 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, Granite State Gas 
Transmission, Inc. (Granite State) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 
136, to become effective November 1, 1997.
    According to Granite State, First Revised Sheet No. 136 removes 
from its tariff a provision that required Granite State to credit 90% 
of revenues for interruptible transportation services, less variable 
costs and surcharges, to its firm transportation customers. Granite 
State further states that the elimination of the crediting provision 
was agreed to in an uncontested settlement in Docket No. RP97-8-000 
approved by the Commission on October 20, 1997.
    Granite State further states that copies of its filing have been 
served on its firm and interruptible customers, on the regulatory 
agencies of the states of Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire and 
the intervenors in the proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests should be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29687 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 62036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30447]



[[Page 62036]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-177-007]


Steuben Gas Storage Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 7, 1997, Steuben Gas Storage Company 
(Steuben) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to 
be effective November 1, 1997.
    Steuben states that the tariff sheets are being filed in compliance 
with the Commission's Order issued on October 27, 1997 in the above 
Captioned docket.
    Steuben states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's Jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30447 Filed 11-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan

Item #33 

Required retiree representative information:

Name: Susan Mauren

Address: P.O. Box 15670, Minneapolis, MN 55415 

Phone: (855) 465-6747 

Email: CentralStatesRetireeRep@losgs.com

33.0
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O . A P
- 7 6 , 6 4 1

E X P A R T E B R I A N C A R L V E A Z I E , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O . 9 9 6 9 6 I N T H E 2 5 2 n d D I S T R I C T C O U R T

F R O M J E F F E R S O N C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O P I N I O N
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte
Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicte d o f aggravated assault and sentenc ed to seventy -five y ear s’ i mprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appeals aff irmed his conviction. Veazie v. State , No. 09-09-00418- CR (Tex. Crim. App.–B eaumont, delivere d April 28, 2010, no pet.). Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rende red ineff e c ti v e a s s is ta

n c e b e c a u s e counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been aff irmed

. We rema

nded this2

application to the trial c ourt for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law

. The trial court has obtained aff idavits from Texas Depa

rtment of Criminal J ustice mail-room officia ls. Ba sed on these aff idavits, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his c onviction ha d been aff irmed. The trial court rec ommends that relief be g rante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex

. C rim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Ninth Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 09-09-00418-
CR that aff

irmed his convic t i o n in Case No. 99696 from the 252nd J udicial District Court of
J eff erson County

. Applicant shall file hi s petition for discretionary revie w wit h this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: September

21, 2011 Do not publish
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (file numbers 333-163959 and 333-174471) of
Shanda Games Limited of our report dated March 19, 2012 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs Limited Company

Shanghai, the Peoples Republic of China

March 19, 2012





LOGO

PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs Limited Company, 11/F PricewaterhouseCoopers Center

2 Corporate Avenue, 202 Hu Bin Road, Luwan District, Shanghai 200021, PRC

T: +86 (21) 2323 8888, F: +86 (21) 2323 8800, www.pwccn.com
Page 3.0

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Checklist Item #3

Does the application include a penalties-of-perjury statement signed by an authorized trustee on 

behalf of the board of trustees?

See section 2.03.

Yes. The required statement is attached as Document No. 3.1.
DocumentNo. 3.1 

Section 2.03 Penalties ofPeljury Statement. 

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this request, including accompanying 

documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request contains all of the relevant facts 

relating to the request, and such facts are true, correct, and complete. 

Authorized Trustee on behalf of the 

Board ofTrustees of the Automotive 

Industries Pension Plan 

3.1.1 

Date 

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-2878-000]


Delmarva Power & Light Company and Pennsylvania Power & Light 
Company; Notice of Filing

November 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 31, 1997, Delmarva Power & Light 
Company and Pennsylvania Power & Light Company, now known as PP&L, 
Inc., tendered for filing an amendment in the above-captioned docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 21, 1997. 
Protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29948 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Instructions for Transferring 

Data from QL-PAY Version 5 to 6
Instructions for Transferring Data from QL-PAY Version 5 to 6 2

1. Importing/Exporting

Due to differences between QL-PAY Version 5 and 6, data must be transferred between the two 

versions using the importing and exporting process. The user must export the data using Version 5 

and then import the data using Version 6.

1.1. Export existing data from Version 5

A. Open QL-Pay Version 5 and select the following menu function: “File” → “Export 

Directory...” Note the location of the directory.

B. Select the exporting function by going to “Sample Sets” → “Export” → “Export all Projects.” 
Instructions for Transferring Data from QL-PAY Version 5 to 6 3

C. The data set(s) will be saved in a single file and sent to the export directory. Open the 

export directory and locate the file that was exported.

Note: Even if multiple sample sets are exported at one time, there will only be one file 

created. 

D. Rename the export file containing the data to be transferred to “Qlpay5_data.xml” and 

save the file to a location that will be remembered. The name must have the “.xml” suffix.

E. After all the data has been exported, the user can choose to uninstall QL-Pay Version 5 at 

their discretion.

1.2. Import existing data into Version 6

A. Install QL-Pay Version 6.

B. Find the location the imported files are being pulled from by looking in the “Imported Files 

Directory.” Note this directory location. A screen shot can be seen on the following page.
Instructions for Transferring Data from QL-PAY Version 5 to 6 4

C. Locate the previously saved file “Qlpay5_data.xml”, and drag the file into the QLPAY 

Version 6 Import directory.

D. Go to “Sample Sets” → “Import” → “Import Sample Sets.” A window will open showing the 

files available to be imported. A screen shot is shown on the following page.
Instructions for Transferring Data from QL-PAY Version 5 to 6 5

E. Select the “Qlpay5_data.xml” file to be imported and select “Open.” 

F. QL-PAY will analyze the existing and new lot(s) to be imported. This import process can be 

time consuming.
Instructions for Transferring Data from QL-PAY Version 5 to 6 6

Note: The program window may say “Not Responding” while the import process is 

occurring. Do not restart the program. Once the files have been imported, the program will 

allow user access again.

a. QL-PAY will prompt the user to Import or Skip each new lot in the file. If all new lots 

need to be imported, check the “Import All New Lots” (box 1 below). If the user 

does not want to import a specific lot, select “Skip this Lot” (box 3 below).