alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hondo Minerals Corporation 10-K/A


Exhibit 32.01
  
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Hondo Minerals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending July 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William R. Miertschin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/ William R. Miertschin
 By: William R. Miertschin
 Chief Executive Officer
  Dated: August 20, 2013
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.13


 


FORM OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
TRANSFER AGENT SERVICING AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into
as of this [    ] day of [          ], 2018, by and between ETF MANAGERS GROUP COMMODITY TRUST I, a Delaware statutory trust (the
“Trust”), ETF MANAGERS CAPITAL LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust (the “Sponsor”), and U.S. BANCORP
FUND SERVICES, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company ("Fund Services”).


 


WHEREAS, the Trust is authorized to issue
shares of beneficial interest in separate series, with each such series representing interests in a separate portfolio of securities
and other assets;


 


WHEREAS, Fund Services is engaged in transfer
agent, dividend disbursing agent and other services to funds; and


 


WHEREAS, the Trust and Fund Services have
entered into an agreement dated January 2, 2015 (the "Agreement") whereby Fund Services has agreed to provide certain
services to each series of the Trust listed on Exhibit A (as amended from time to time) (each a “Fund” and collectively,
the “Funds”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend Exhibit
A of the Agreement to include a new separate series of the Trust, the Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
promises and mutual covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, do hereby agree as follows:


 


Exhibit A is hereby amended to include the
following fund: Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment
to be executed by a duly authorized officer on one or more counterparts as of the date first above written.


 


ETF MANAGERS GROUP COMMODITY


TRUST I





	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:	 	 	 


 






     


     


    

 


U.S. BANCORP FUND SERVICES, LLC





	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:	 	 	 


 


ETF MANAGERS CAPITAL LLC





	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29255]



[[Page 59859]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3056-000]


R. Hadler and Company, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

October 31, 1997.
    R. Hadler and Company, Inc. (Hadler) filed an application for 
authorization to engage in the wholesale sale and brokering of capacity 
and energy at market-based rates, and for certain waivers and 
authorizations. In particular, Hadler requested that the Commission 
grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of 
securities and assumptions of liabilities by Hadler. On October 17, 
1997, the Commission issued an Order Conditionally Accepting for Filing 
Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's October 17, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):
    (D) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by Hadler should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (E) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (D) above, Hadler is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations or liabilities as guarantor, 
endorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of Hadler, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (G) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of Hadler's 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities. * * *
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is November 17, 1997.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29255 Filed 11-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

CERTIFICATE OF DISSOLUTION 

OF 
 SORRENTO TECH, INC.

 Pursuant to Section 275(a) and (b) 

of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware 

Sorrento Tech, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY: 
 1. The name of the Corporation is Sorrento Tech, Inc. 

2. The date the dissolution was authorized was October 26, 2017. 

3. That the dissolution of the Corporation was duly authorized by the Board of Directors and the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance
with the provisions of Section 275(a) and (b) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 
 4. That the names and
addresses of the directors and officers of the Corporation are as follows: 
 DIRECTORS 

 

			
	James E. Barrett	  	 c/o Sorrento Tech, Inc., 20 Independence Boulevard

Warren, NJ 07059

		
	Mary Duseau	  	 c/o Sorrento Tech, Inc., 20 Independence Boulevard

Warren, NJ 07059

		
	Michael P. Doyle, Ph.D	  	 c/o Sorrento Tech, Inc., 20 Independence Boulevard

Warren, NJ 07059

		
	David W. J. McGirr	  	 c/o Sorrento Tech, Inc., 20 Independence Boulevard

Warren, NJ 07059

		
	Paul G. Thomas	  	 c/o Sorrento Tech, Inc., 20 Independence Boulevard

Warren, NJ 07059

		
	Nicholas J. Valeriani	  	 c/o Sorrento Tech, Inc., 20 Independence Boulevard

Warren, NJ 07059









 OFFICERS 

 

					
	Mary Duseau	  	President	  	 c/o Sorrento Tech, Inc., 20 Independence Boulevard

Warren, NJ 07059

			
	Lars Boesgaard	  	VP and CFO	  	 c/o Sorrento Tech, Inc., 20 Independence Boulevard

Warren, NJ 07059



 5. The date of filing of the Corporation’s original certificate of incorporation with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware is September 3, 2009. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be duly executed this 28th day
of December, 2017. 
  

			
	SORRENTO TECH, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mary Duseau

	Name:	 	Mary Duseau
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSRS

 

Investment Company Act file number  811-08599

 

DWS Equity Trust

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 04/30 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 10/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

----
#### Byron BAXLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-952.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 6, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1897 

To require a diagnostic test for COVID–19 for an inadmissible alien released 

from the custody of the United States Customs and Border Protection 

or the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS (for herself, Mr. KATKO, and Mr. NORMAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require a diagnostic test for COVID–19 for an inadmissible alien released from the custody of the United States 

Customs and Border Protection or the United States 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Requiring Every Alien 

5 Receive a COVID–19 Test Act’’ or the ‘‘REACT Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1897 IH

1 SEC. 2. COVID–19 TESTING FOR CERTAIN ALIENS. 

2 Beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

3 the Secretary of Homeland Security shall administer a di4 agnostic test, and receive a negative result, for COVID– 

5 19 to an inadmissible alien who has entered the United 

6 States and— 

7 (1) is released from the custody of the United 

8 States Customs and Border Protection or the United 

9 States Immigration and Customs Enforcement with10 in 30 days of entry into the United States; or 

11 (2) is placed in an alternative to detention pro12 gram within 30 days of entry into the United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Daniel Ernest GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-193.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 1974.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

McCORD, Judge.

A two count indictment was filed against appellant charging him in the first count with the crime of robbery and in the second count with the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony (robbery). Both crimes were part of the same transaction or act — the robbery of Gus Williams trading and doing business as Singleton’s Barbecue in Duval County. Appellant was found guilty of both counts and the trial court imposed a sentence of 25 years imprisonment on the first count, and a 10 year prison sentence on the second count, the two sentences to run concurrently. The sentence on the second count violates the single transaction rule and cannot stand. See Cone v. State, Fla., 285 So.2d 12 (1973). Appellant can be sentenced only for the highest offense charged of which he was convicted — robbery. This court can and does amend the sentence rendering it unnecessary to return the appellant to the trial court for resentencing. See Dawson v. State, 266 So.2d 116 (1 Fla.App., 1972). It is therefore ordered that the 10 year sentence for use of a firearm during the commission of a felony is vacated. The sentence of 25 years imprisonment for the crime of robbery is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON, J., concur.
Exhibit








 Exhibit 10.1
2018 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan


Eligible Employees:  All non-Section 16 officers (“Vice Presidents”) and senior executives (Section 16) officers (“Executive Officers”) of the Company are eligible for participation in the Company’s 2018 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan.  


Applicable Period:  The 2018 Cash Incentive Plan applies to performance during the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.  


 Components of the Plan and Criteria to Fund:  The 2018 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan consists of the following three components: (i) revenue targets; (ii) EBITDA targets, and (iii) integration targets (synergies and sale/leaseback).  Each component of the 2018 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan includes targets at minimum, plan, and maximum payout with the exception of the sale/leaseback transaction target. The minimum targets serve as the threshold upon which the incentive pool will begin to fund for that component.  Achievement of the components at plan/target will earn the target cash incentive opportunity.  Payout will be calculated along a linear continuum from minimum to plan/target and from plan/target to maximum with the maximum target serving as the point at which the management team will earn the highest possible cash incentive opportunity.


The minimum performance target must be met in order for a portion of the bonus to be paid relative to any one of the three components.  Each component will be measured separately.  Bonus payouts will be based forty percent (40%) on achievement of revenue targets, forty percent (40%) on achievement of EBITDA targets; fifteen percent (15%) on achievement of cost savings integration targets; and five percent (5%) on achievement of the sale/leaseback target.


The following table below represents the target bonus and maximum bonus for each of the Company’s Vice Presidents and above and as a percent of such employee’s annual base salary.  


	
				
	Executive Officer


	Target
	Maximum

	President and CEO
	125%
	175%

	Executive Officers (other than President and CEO)
	75%
	100%

	Vice Presidents
	50%
	70%
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, H.P. Jin, the chief executive officer of TeleNav, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/S/    H.P. JINH.P. JinPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: September 24, 2010
_________________________________________________________________________________________

1635 Prince Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314
- 2818 Telephon e: (703) 683
- 4646 Fax: (703) 683
- 4745

Dedicated to the advancement of the international helicopter community www.rotor.com November 13 , 2012 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M
- 30 West Building ground floor Room W12
- 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 Re: Petition for Extension of Exemption: Exemption No. 6002H , FAA Docket No. 2002

- 12804 Dear Sir or Madam: On December 16, 1994, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Exemption No. 6002 to Helicopter Association International (HAI) and the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) (hereinafter, the “Petitioners”). This exempt ion, from § 43.3(a) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR), was granted “to the extent necessary to allow pilots employed b y m ember operators of the petitioners, not permitted under § 43.3(g) to perform preventative maintenance, to remove and reinstall LO X [L iquid Oxygen Sy stem] containers in their aircraft, after receiving and documenting appropriate training in this task by a properl y certificated airframe mechanic,” subject to certain conditions and limitations stated therein. Since the first Exempt ion No. 6002 was granted, it has been extended every two years. The latest extension, Exemption No. 6002 H will expire, by its own terms, on January 31, 201 3
. The conditions and circumstances pursuant to which Exemption No. 6002 was originally granted rem ain unchanged. Experience with Exemption No. 6002 demonstrates that the public interest is served and a level of safet y equivalent to regulation is maintained when properly trained air medical service pilots are permitted to remove and reinstall L OX conta iners in their aircraft. Pursuant to FAR §11.87, good cause exists to waive publication of this petition for extension of exemption in the Federal Register, because the extension, if granted, would not set a precedent, and an y delay in acting on this peti tion would be a detriment to the Petitioners and the public. Exemption No. 6002 remains vital to the public interest despite the addition to the federal aviation regulations of subsection 14 CFR § 43.3(i), which authorizes properly trained pilots ofDedicated to the advancement of the international helicopter community.

certa in aircraft operated pursuant to 14 CFR part 135 to remove and reinstall “approved cabin
mounted medical ox ygen bottles” only “when no tools are required.” Exemption 6002 authorizes trained air medical aircraft pilots “to remove and reinstall LOX containe rs in their aircraft” using simple hand tools when “no special tools are required to perform the container exchange,” subject to the conditions stated therein. Therefore, HAI and AAMS petition the Administrator to extend Exemption No. 6002 for an additi onal two
- ye ar term, or for such longer term as the Administrator may deem appropriate. The Petitioners further ask the Administrator to find good cause exists to waive publication. Sincerel y,

Matthew S. Zuccaro President cc: M r . Rick Sherlock , CEO , AAMS
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC  20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

[ X ] 		**QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
			OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
For the quarterly period ended:  April 30, 2001**OR**
[    ] 		**TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
			OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
For the transition period from _________ to ___________

Commission file number     0-12619
                                                   Collins Industries, Inc.                                                       .
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                  Missouri               		                                               43-0985160                .
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)				    (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

               15 Compound Drive                   Hutchinson, Kansas                     67502-4349                        .
 (Address of principal executive offices)					   			(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number including area code	         620-663-5551                                          .
 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (orfor such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

 

					     Yes  X .	No .
 

 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Common Stock, $.10 par value						      7,338,255            .
     Class						                  Outstanding at May 21, 2001
**COLLINS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

April 30, 2001

INDEX**
Muldoon, Albert (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

KIM DEVORE <kim.devore@jpo-online.com> 

Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:59 AM 

EAS (OST); boonecountyairport@windstream.net 

Harrison 

't:e;r-CST- \~{7- ;)93~ 

:' ;" ·:. 

... :'' ... 

I SUPPORT BOUTIQUE AIR'S PROPOSAL BECAUSE THE MODERN PRESSURIZED PILATUS 

AIRCRAFT WILL SAVE ME TIME AND OFFER A MORE COMFORTABLE RIDE WHEN I GO TO SEE 

MY RELATIVES IN DALLAS. 

1
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period(s) covered in the  Report. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      July 24, 2008 |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/      Colleen A. Zuhl     |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | Colleen      A. Zuhl         |
|   |   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----

----
#### Eugene SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1051.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 17, 1973.

Gerald Piken, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the record and briefs of counsel in this cause, and we have con-eluded that reversible error has been made to appear and has been confessed to by the state. We are of the opinion that the confession of reversible error by the state is supported by the record and the law and that oral argument in this cause would serve no purpose. Therefore the judgment and sentence appealed from is hereby reversed.

Reversed.
Exhibit 99.3

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cenovus Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40F for
the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian C. Ferguson, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 11, 2016



|    |  |                                     |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Brian C. Ferguson               |  | 
|    |  | Brian C. Ferguson                   |  | 
|    |  | President & Chief Executive Officer |  |