alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[FRL-5922-8]


Acid Rain Program; Notice of Public Workshop on an Emissions 
Trading Program for Oxides of Nitrogen (NO<INF>X</INF>)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public workshops on a NO<INF>X</INF> emissions 
trading program. The second workshop will be held on December 11, from 
9 a.m. to 5 p.m., at the Washington National Airport Hilton Hotel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA recently issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to reduce 
regional transport of ozone. As part of this rulemaking, EPA is 
developing a multi-state cap and trade program for large stationary 
sources. As a way to increase flexibility and maximize cost savings, 
EPA is offering to administer such a program. States are encouraged to 
participate in the trading program as a simple and cost-effective 
strategy for meeting their state-wide emission budget requirements. It 
is anticipated that a model trading rule will be included in a 
supplemental document of proposed rulemaking for the transport rule in 
early 1998 and will be finalized along with the transport rule in 
September 1998.
    In order to provide a forum for input on the framework of a model 
NO<INF>X</INF> cap and trade program, EPA decided to hold two public 
workshops. The first workshop was held in early November; a variety of 
comments from States and interested participants were received on the 
trading program framework. The second workshop will be held on December 
11, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., at the Washington National Airport Hilton 
Hotel located at 2399 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington Virginia. EPA 
will use input from these workshops in developing the model trading 
rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Benkovic in EPA's Acid Rain 
Division (6204J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20460 at (202) 233-9142.

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
Brian J. McLean,
Director, Acid Rain Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Office of 
Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 97-30245 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EX-10.38



 Exhibit 10.38 

WRITTEN CONSENT OF PREFERRED MAJORITY HOLDER 

_________, 2018 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS,
following its initial public offering, ADT Inc. (the “Company”) may seek to make a distribution to its holders of common equity (a “Distribution”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9(a)(i) of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series
A Preferred Securities of the Company (the “Series A Designation”), the Company is prohibited from making any Distribution without the prior written consent of Koch SV Investments, LLC (“Koch”), the Preferred
Majority Holder (as defined in the Series A Designation), in accordance with Section 10 of the Series A Designation; and 

WHEREAS, Koch desires to consent to a one-time distribution on or before June 30, 2018,
not to exceed $50,000,000. 
 WRITTEN CONSENT 

1.    Consent. In exchange for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged, Koch
hereby consents to one distribution on or before June 30, 2018, not to exceed $50,000,000 (the “Permitted Distribution”), in accordance with Section 10 of the Series A Designation and accordingly the Permitted Distribution
shall not result in, upon notice or passage of time or otherwise, in a default, breach or violation of the Series A Designation or any Related Agreement (as defined in the Series A Designation). 

2.    Effect of Consent. Except as expressly provided in Section 1, this Written
Consent of Preferred Majority Holder does not, by implication or otherwise, nor shall it be deemed to operate to, alter, modify, waive, amend or in any way affect any of the rights, remedies, powers, privileges or covenants contained in the Series A
Designation or in any Related Agreement. The consent set forth in Section 1 above will not be deemed to (a) be consent to any past, current or future amendment, waiver or modification of any other term or condition of
the Series A Designation or any Related Agreement or (b) otherwise prejudice any right or remedy which Koch may now have or may have in the future under or in connection with the Series A Designation or any Related Agreement. 

This Written Consent shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any
choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware. 

[Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Written Consent is executed as of the date first written above.

 PREFERRED MAJORITY HOLDER 

KOCH SV INVESTMENTS, LLC 

By:                   
                                         
          
 Name: 

Title: 
  

			
	 ACKNOWLEDGED:

	
	 ADT INC.



			
		
	 By:
	 	 


			
		
	 Name:
	 	 


			
		
	 Title:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5831-5832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3044]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may

[[Page 5832]]

express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that 
notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be 
received not later than February 21, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Eduardo Antonio Masferrer, Miami, Florida; to acquire an 
additional 8.51 percent, for a total of 15.2 percent, of the voting 
shares of Hamilton Bancorp, Inc., Miami, Florida, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Hamilton Bank, N.A., Miami, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 3, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-3044 Filed 2-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### Lydia MANDELL, Appellant, v. DREXEL PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-71.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 29, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30067]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC98-5-000]


American Ref-Fuel Company of Hempstead, Air Products Ref-Fuel of 
Hempstead, Inc., Duke/UAE Ref-Fuel LLC, and Duke/UAE of Hempstead LLC; 
Notice of Filing

November 10, 1997.
    Take notice that American Ref-Fuel Company of Hempstead, Air 
Products Ref-fuel of Hempstead, Inc., Duke/UAE Ref-Fuel LLC, and Duke/
UAE Hempstead LLC on November 5, 1997, tendered for filing, at the 
request of Commission staff, a Purchase Agreement reflecting the 
disposition for which Commission approval is sought in this docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 17, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30067 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48140-48141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19451]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9016-5]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 
564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 08/04/2014 Through 08/08/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140221, Draft EIS, USFS, ID, Pocatello, Midnight, and Michaud 
Allotment Management Plan Revisions, Comment Period Ends: 11/12/2014, 
Contact: Jeffery Hammes (208) 236-7500.
EIS No. 20140222, Draft EIS, NRC, TN, Generic-License Renewal of 
Nuclear Plants Regarding Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Comment 
Period Ends: 09/29/2014, Contact: David Drucker 301-415-6223.
EIS No. 20140223, Draft EIS, FERC, 00, Algonquin Incremental Market 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 09/29/2014, Contact: Magdalene Suter 202-
502-6463.
EIS No. 20140224, Draft EIS, FERC, PR, Aguirre Offshore GasPort 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 09/29/2014, Contact: Gertrude Johnson 
202-502-6692.
EIS No. 20140225, Final EIS, USFS, CA, Tule River Reservation 
Protection Project, Review Period Ends: 09/22/2014, Contact: Richard 
Stevens 559-539-2607.
EIS No. 20140226, Final EIS, USACE, NC, Bogue Banks Coastal Storm 
Damage Reduction, Review Period Ends: 09/15/2014, Contact: Eric K. 
Gasch 910-251-4553.
EIS No. 20140227, Final EIS, DOE, NY, Champlain Hudson Power Express 
Transmission Line Project (DOE/EIS-0447), Review Period Ends: 09/15/
2014, Contact: Brian Mills 202-586-6287.
EIS No. 20140228, Draft EIS, FTA, CA, Redlands Passenger Rail Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 09/29/2014, Contact: Dominique Paukowits 415-744-
2735.
EIS No. 20140229, Final EIS, DOE, LA, Adoption--Cameron Liquefaction 
Project, Contact: John Anderson 202-586-0521.

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has adopted the U.S. Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission's final EIS 20140133, filed with 
USEPA 04/30/2014. DOE was a cooperating agency and recirculation of the 
document is not necessary under Section 1306.3(c) of the CEQ 
Regulations.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20140217, Draft Supplement, NNSA, TN, Production of Tritium in 
a Commercial Light Water Reactor, Comment Period Ends: 09/22/2014, 
Contact: Curtis Chambellan 505-845-5073.

    Revision to the FR Notice Published on 08/08/2014; Comment Period 
End Date should read 09/22/2014.

[[Page 48141]]

    Dated: August 12, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-19451 Filed 8-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JIOVANI CERDE REYES, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 10-70969 Agency No. A087-756-191
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted September 11, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: WALLACE, SCHROEDER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Jiovani Cerde Reyes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) order dismissing his appeal. Cerde Reyes appealed to the Board from an immigration judge’s (IJ) removal order, which was based upon Cerde Reyes’s admissi ons and concessions before the IJ. 

# FILED
OCT 24 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S .C. § 1252; we review de novo, Perez-Mejia v. Holder , 663 F.3d 403, 409 (9th Cir. 2011); and we deny the petition. The Board did not err in dismissing Cerde Reyes’s appeal because Reyes admitted the factual allegations contained in his Notice to Appear and conceded he was removable on the basis of his Arizona conviction for possession of a forgery device, a crime which Cerde Reyes con ceded—and the IJ correctly determined, based on an independent review of th e statute—was categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. “[I]f at the . . . pleading stage an alien . . . makes admissions of fact or concedes remova bility, and the IJ accepts them, no further evidence concerning the issues of fact admitted or law conceded is necessary.” Id. at 414. And if “the immigration judge is satisfied that no issues of law or fact remain, the immigration judge may determ ine that removability as charged has been established by the admissions of the respondent.” Id. at 416 (citing 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(c)). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1289

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus RICHARD D. MEDLIN, Defendant - Appellant, DENISE M. SMITH, Respondent,
HEARTHSIDE BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, INCORPORATED; EASTLAND DEVELOPERS,INCORPORATED; GARDNER H. ALTMAN, JR.; MIDSOUTH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL T. MILLS; LANDFALL ASSOCIATES; LELAND PARTNERSHIP; THOMAS L. DOWNS, JR., d/b/a Pro’s Automotive and Sales; LAWYERS TITLE OF NORTH CAROLINA, INCORPORATED; THE DOOR CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH, INCORPORATED, Garnishees, and
CYLLENE M. MEDLIN; EDWARD H. MEDLIN, Individually; B ROOKSTONE DEVELOPERS, INCORPORATED; MCBETH & MOORE, INCORPORATED; SUNBELT DIVERSITIES CORPORATION; THE KEYS CORPORATION; EUGENE BOYCE, as Trustee of the Trust of Amanda Nicole Medlin under the trust agreement dated January 4, 1993; BUNCOMBE2 COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; LEADER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-104-7-BR) Submitted: October 8, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard D. Medlin, Appellant Pro Se. Louie Franklin Elmore, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville, South Carolina; Daniel Lee Brawley, Sr., WARD & SMITH, P.A., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).*Because Medlin is a prisoner, his notice of appeal is considered filed the day it is signed and delivered to prison authorities. Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
3 PER CURIAM: Richard D. Medlin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5) motion for relief from judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Medlin’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 10, 2002. Medlin’s notice of appeal was filed on February 19, 2002. *Because Medlin failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the4 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1861 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow schools 

that participate in the school lunch program under such Act to serve 

whole milk. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. DELGADO) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to allow schools that participate in the school lunch 

program under such Act to serve whole milk. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Whole Milk for 

5 Healthy Kids Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WHOLE MILK PERMISSIBLE. 

7 Section 9(a)(2)(A) of the Richard B. Russell National 

8 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(2)(A)) is amended 

9 to read as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1861 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Lunches served by 

2 schools participating in the school lunch pro3 gram under this chapter— 

4 ‘‘(i) shall offer students a variety of 

5 fluid milk; 

6 ‘‘(ii) may offer students flavored and 

7 unflavored whole, reduced-fat, low-fat and 

8 fat-free fluid milk and lactose-free fluid 

9 milk; and 

10 ‘‘(iii) shall provide a substitute for 

11 fluid milk for students whose disability re12 stricts their diet, on receipt of a written 

13 statement from a licensed physician that 

14 identifies the disability that restricts the 

15 student’s diet and that specifies the sub16 stitute for fluid milk.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28751]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ACE-15]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Aurora, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at Aurora, MO.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 62 FR 43275 is effective 0901 
UTC, October 31, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 
12th Street, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on August 13, 1997 
(62 FR 43275). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on October 31, 1997. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on September 18, 1997.
H. J. Lyons, Jr.,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 97-28751 Filed 10-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61858-61859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30359]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 27-1A, Certification of Normal Category 
Rotorcraft

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance and availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Advisory Circular (AC) 27-1A, Certification of Normal Category 
Rotorcraft, is a total revision of AC 27-1 dated August 29, 1985, with 
changes 1, 2, 3, and 4 dated September 16, 1987, April 24, 1989, 
September 12, 1991, and August 18, 1995, respectively, incorporated. In 
addition, new material plus changes to existing paragraphs have been 
incorporated to bring the AC up-to-date with various rule changes to 14 
CFR Part 27. As part of the FAA effort to achieve national 
standardization in rotorcraft certification, the AC serves as a ready 
reference for manufacturers, modifiers, FAA design evaluation 
engineers, flight test engineers, and engineering flight test pilots 
and has been harmonized with the Joint Aviation Authority (JAA) to 
establish common guidance for the U.S. and for JAA member nations. The 
AC material has no legally binding status and must be treated as 
advisory only.

DATES: AC 27-1A was issued by the Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service, on July 30, 1997.
    How to Order: A copy of AC 27-1A may be purchased from the 
Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, U.S. Government Printing 
Office, Washington, DC 20402, or from any of the Government Printing 
Offices located in major cities throughout the United States. Identify 
the publication as AC 27-1A, Certification of Normal Category 
Rotorcraft, Stock Number 050-007-01186-5. The cost is $57.00 per copy 
for orders mailed within the U.S. and $71.25 for orders mailed outside 
of

[[Page 61859]]

the U.S. Send a check or money order, made payable to Superintendent of 
Documents, with your request. Requests may also be made by calling the 
Government Printing Office at 202-512-1800. No c.o.d. orders are 
accepted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Kathy Jones, FAA, Rotorcraft Standards Staff, Rotorcraft 
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-
0110, telephone (817) 222-5359, fax (817) 222-5961.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 7, 1997.
Eric Bries,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 97-30359 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M