alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

List of Subsidiaries at December 31, 2005:

NAME                                               STATE OF INCORPORATION/FORMATION
----                                               --------------------------------
Alpha Monticello, Inc.                             Delaware
Alpha Casino Management Inc.                       Delaware
Monticello Casino Management, LLC                  New York
Mohawk Management, LLC                             New York
Monticello Raceway Development Company, LLC        New York
Monticello Raceway Management, Inc.                New York
Alpha Gulf Coast, Inc.                             Delaware
Alpha St. Regis, Inc.                              Delaware
Alpha Missouri, Inc.                               Delaware
Alpha Rising Sun, Inc.                             Delaware
Alpha Greenville Hotel, Inc.                       Delaware
Alpha Entertainment, Inc.                          Delaware
Alpha Peach Tree Corporation                       Delaware
Alpha Florida Entertainment, L.L.C.                Florida
Jubilation Lakeshore, Inc.                         Mississippi
New York Gaming, LLC                               Georgia
Empire Resorts Holdings, Inc.                      Delaware
Empire Resorts Sub, Inc.                           Delaware
```
Application Receipt Letter

(Complete this Application Receipt Letter if you want notification 

 that your application has reached the Grants Office)

_____________________________ 

_____________________________ 

_____________________________ 

Dear __________________________ 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency=s Grants Operations Branch has received your 

application. The EPA identification number assigned to your project is 

__________________. 

______________________________ is the project=s Grants Specialist. If you have any 

questions, please contact your grants specialist at (202) 564 - ____________. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Rochon 

Grants and Interagency Agreement Management Division
Exhibit 31.2 

 

I, Theodore A. Babcock, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TNP Enterprises, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and as presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and; 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2003
1

BECKHAM, LISA

From: Eric C. Massey <Massey.Eric@azdeq.gov>

Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 5:57 PM

To: BECKHAM, LISA

Cc: Rios, Gerardo; McKaughan, Colleen; Steve Burr; Balaji Vaidyanathan

Subject: RE: Clarification of ADEQ's Comments on EPA's Proposed Action 

Ms. Beckham, 

Thank you so much for the e-mail and for the opportunity to clarify and confirm the comments that were submitted on 

April 17, 2015. 

1. I can confirm that your interpretation of the memorandum regarding the use of the term “proposed final 

permit” is accurate. Proposed final permits are enforceable at the time that the permits are issued. 

2. I can also confirm that your interpretation of our comments regarding ADEQ’s discretion under R18-2-334(E) as 

accurate. Specifically, R18-2-334 requires ADEQ to consider the air quality impacts of a project, using the criteria 

established in R18-2-334(E)(1) through (6), in each instance where the applicant has not submitted an AQIA 

under R18-2-334(C)(2). 

If there is anything more with which I can be of assistance, please let me know! 

Sincerely, 

Eric C. Massey, Director 

Air Quality Division 

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 

e-mail: ecm@azdeq.gov

phone: (602) 771-2288 

From: BECKHAM, LISA [mailto:BECKHAM.LISA@EPA.GOV] 

Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:20 PM 

To: Eric C. Massey 

Cc: Rios, Gerardo; McKaughan, Colleen; Steve Burr 

Subject: Clarification of ADEQ's Comments on EPA's Proposed Action 

Mr. Massey, 

On April 17, 2015, you submitted comments on EPA’s March 18, 2015 proposed action on ADEQ’s NSR SIP submittal. In 

reviewing your comments it would be helpful if you could provide a couple of clarifications. 

1. On pages 2-4 of your April 17 letter, you provided comments on EPA’s proposed limited disapprovals related to 

the use of the term “proposed final permit” in ADEQ’s rules. Your comments (and memo on the issue) specify 

that proposed final permits under ADEQ’s program are “final, appealable agency action.” We interpret this to 

mean that a proposed final permit is also enforceable at the time it is issued. Can you confirm that this is also 

your interpretation? 

2. On pages 4-8 of your April 17 letter, you provided comments on EPA’s proposed limited disapproval related to 

how sources are reviewed for impacts on the NAAQS under R18-2-334. As an example, your comments specify 
2

that ADEQ has an “obligation to require an AQIA if the objective condition specified in the rule is satisfied” and 

that “ADEQ’s discretion under R18-2-334(E) is minimal.” We interpret your comments as explaining that R18-2-

334 requires your to consider the air quality impacts of a project, using the criteria established in R18-2-

334(E)(1)-(6), in each instance where the applicant has not submitted an AQIA under R18-2-334(C)(2). Can you 

confirm that this is your interpretation? 

If you have any questions concerning these clarifications please feel free to contact me. Have a great weekend! 

Lisa Beckham 

Environmental Engineer 

Air Permits Office 

EPA Region 9 

(415) 972-3811
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate~** 

# (!Courtof**~peaI~** 

# fortbe jf

# eberaI <!Circuit
JAMES W. STANLEY, JR., Claimant-Appellant, 

### v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. 2012-7121 Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-4142, Judge William A. Moorman. 

### ON MOTION ORDER Eric K. Shinseki moves without opposition for a 14- day extension oftime, until December 3, 2012, to file his principal brief. Upon consideration thereof, Case: 12-7121 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 12/03/2012JAMES STANLEY, JR. V. SHINSEKI 

### ITIs ORDERED 

### THAT: The motion is granted.



### s27 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2 Case: 12-7121 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 12/03/2012
EX 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Du Kang Co., Ltd. Corporation (the "Company") on Form  10-K  for the period ending December 31, 2009 has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I,  Liu Su Ying,  Chief Financial Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and  result  of  operations  of the Company.





Name & Title
Date/s/  Liu Su YingChief Financial Officer (PrincipalFinancial Officer)
January 24, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-164-005]


Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 12, 1997.
    Take notice that November 6, 1997, Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc. (TOP), 
tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 78, with a proposed 
effective date of November 1, 1997.
    TOP states that this tariff sheet is being filed to comply with the 
Letter Order issued on October 27, 1997, by the Director of the Office 
of Pipeline Regulation (Director) in Docket No. RP97-164-004. In that 
Letter Order, the Director accepted tariffs sheets filed by TOP on 
October 2, 1997 in compliance with the Commission's June 30, 1997 
Letter Order, subject to TOP refiling sheet No. 78 to reflect certain 
minor modifications. TOP states that the proposed substitute tariff 
sheet incorporates the modifications as directed in the October 27, 
1997 Letter Order.
    TOP further states that copies of this filing have been served on 
TOP's jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file wit the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30186 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                 PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Torbay Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, William Thomas Large, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 16, 2005       /s/ William Thomas Large
                           --------------------------
                              William Thomas Large, President,
                              Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                              Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 accompanying this certification
and filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Martin Roenigk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 1, 2006

                               /S/ Martin Roenigk
                               -----------------------
                                   Martin Roenigk
                               Chief Executive Officer
##### 



COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Comprehensive Care Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 9, 2004 (the Report),
Mary Jane Johnson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/   Mary Jane JohnsonMary Jane Johnson
Chief Executive Officer
January 9, 2004


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Comprehensive Care
Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of the Board of Advisors to the President, Naval War 
College, Open Meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is given that the Board of Advisors to 
the President, Naval War College, will meet from 0830-1700 on November 
21, 1997 in Conolly Hall, Naval War College, 686 Cushing Road, Newport, 
Rhode Island. The meeting will be open to the public.
    The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the advice of the Board on 
educational, doctrinal and research policies and programs. The agenda 
will consist of presentations and discussions on the curriculum, 
programs and plans of the college since the last meeting of the Board 
on May 29 and 30, 1996. Naval War College.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Mary E. Estabrooks, Assistant to 
the Dean of Academics, Naval War College, 686 Cushing Road, Newport, RI 
02841-1207. Telephone number (401) 841-3589.

    Dated: October 21, 1997.
Darse E. Crandall,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-28868 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
### 3511 10 

# Chemical RECEIVED



# oPPrcalc 

# Products 2013JfaiJ 15 AM6~01 

# Corporation
January 9, 2013 102Old Mill Road SE P .O
. Box 2470 Cartersville, Georgia 30120-1692 Phone: 770-382-2144 Fax: 770386-6053 e-mail : jcookQcpo-us.com

IIIIII IIIII IIIII1IIIII

IIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Document Control Office (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 (Attention: TSCA section 4 test rule) Subject : Request for Time Extension submitted by Chemical

Products Corp
. and WEGO Chemical Corp
. 9,10 Anthracenedione, CAS # 84-65-1 TSCA Section 4 40 CFR 799.5089; Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531
Dear Madamor Sir; p. 1

Chemical Products Corporation and Wego Chemical Corporation request an extension of the time limit for submitting data [Toxicity to Plants (Algae) (C6)] for 9,10-Anthracenedione, CASRN 84-65-1, required by the final rule published in the January 7, 2011 Federal Register, Volume 76, Number 5, at pages 1067 through 1093 entitled "Testing of Certain High Production Volume
Page 1 of2 January 9, 2013 

### CONTAINS NOCBIChemical Products Corporation

Chemicals, Second Group of Chemicals", docketed under EPA docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531
. This request for additional time is necessitated by a number of difficulties encountered while attempting to conduct the required testing of this compound
. We have had numerous EPA reviews of analytical methods and consultations with EPA technical staff regarding the testing itself
. This has resulted in delays in finding a lab qualified to do this testing and the associated analytical chemistry and in scheduling the testing
. Our dialog with the EPA continues as of the date of this letter
. We request an extension of the date for submission of the results of testing until September 30, 2013
. This extension is requested for testing requirement Aquatic Toxicity, Test Symbol C6, Toxicity to Plants (Algae)
. If I can answer any questions concerning this letter, please telephone me at 770-382-2144 Ext
. 272 or 770-714-3806 (cell), or email me at icookecpc-us .com . Sincerely,
c~ a Jerry A
. Cook Technical Director

Page 2of2 January 9, 20131 0 2 E

'71JINn N~ -0 -~

z 0 Cie ca 0 rn CL Ln

r=i Ir Lr) r-I M WO C3 M C3 CL 13 :: . C3

Ln --i ZY,

m V ~ ..o c N O < x O W m f-
= o Vd L~ O_ L~ a a O u ,^ ~o cr : . 3 o z v a z o° " > `r Oa` ¢ * Q C w N O +~' l+ .tCp U 7 ! 0 u o ~ c Q

c o U c E ~ a r

Q t . U a 0 ~ C OOW

r3Q

®

eo m Ln a rv ul r9 O O O O .2- m

. O O ti {.)

Ei) 1,1 l~)
#### HOME MILK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION et al., Petitioners, v. Alex HARRIS et al., Respondents.

No. 40822.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 26, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
FILED: October 2, 2018 PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1173 (L) (LRH

- 2015

- 582

- GBR)

SIERRA CLUB; WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION; INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION; APPALACHIAN VOICES; CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK Petitioners

v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army; TODD T. SEMONITE, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and commanding Gen eral of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; PHILIP M. SECRIST, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District; MICHAEL E. HATTEN, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps o f Engineers, Huntington District Respondents MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Intervenor

O R D E R2 PER CURIAM: Petitioners ask this Court to set aside Respondent U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (the “Corps”) December 22, 2017, verification and July 3, 2018, reinstated verification that construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (the “Pipeline”) can proceed under the terms and conditions of Clean Water Act Nationwide Permit 12 (“NWP 12”), rather than an individual permit. Among other argu ments, Petitioners assert that, in issuing its verification, the Corps improperly imposed one condition

— requiring use of a “dry cut” method for constructing four river crossings

— “in lieu of” a special condition imposed by the State of West Virginia, J.A. 2 32

— that “[i]ndividual stream crossings must be completed in a continuous, progressive manner within 72 hours , ” J.A. 43

— as part of its certification of NWP 12. Construction of each of the four river crossings using the “dry cut” method is expected to take four

- to

- six weeks to complete. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 717r(d)(1), we conclude, for reasons to be more fully explained in a forthcoming opinion, that the Corps lacked authority to substitute the “dry cut” requirement “in lieu of” W est Virginia’s 72

- hour temporal restriction . Accordingly, we VACATE , in its entirety, the Corps’ verification of the Pipeline’s compliance with NWP 12

. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) ; 33 C.F.R. § 330.6(d) (explaining that if any part of a project requires an indi vidual permit, then “the NWP does not apply and all portions of the project must be evaluated as part of the individual permit3 process . ”). We reserve judgment on the parties’ remaining arguments until our forthcoming opinion



### .

FOR THE COURT /s/ Patricia S. Connor Cl erk
Southwest Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Plan 

Checklist Item #21 

Does the application describe how the plan sponsor took into account — or did not take into account — in 

the determination that all reasonable measures have been taken to avoid insolvency the impact of: 

• benefit and contribution levels on retaining active participants and bargaining groups under the 

plan; and 

• past and anticipated contribution increases under the plan on employer attrition and retention 

levels? 

See Section 5.03. 

Document 20.1 contains the description of how the Board of Trustees of the Southwest Ohio Regional 

Council of Carpenters Pension Plan took into account the impact of: 

• benefit and contribution levels on retaining active participants and bargaining groups under the 

plan; and 

■ past and anticipated contribution increases under the plan on employer attrition and retention 

levels 

in the determination that all reasonable measures have been taken to avoid insolvency. 

Document 21 

SWORCCPP-000160
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH HOLMES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 594 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.