alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1762 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To direct the Federal Trade Commission to submit to Congress a report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices 

targeted at Indian Tribes or members of Indian Tribes, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1762 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Indian 

3 Tribes from Scams Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROTECTING INDIAN TRIBES FROM UNFAIR OR DE5 CEPTIVE ACTS OR PRACTICES. 

6 (a) FTC REPORT ON UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE ACTS

7 OR PRACTICES TARGETING INDIAN TRIBES.—Not later 

8 than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

9 and after consultation with Indian Tribes, the Commission 

10 shall make publicly available on the website of the Com11 mission and submit to the Committee on Energy and Com12 merce of the House of Representatives and the Committee 

13 on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate 

14 a report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices targeted 

15 at Indian Tribes or members of Indian Tribes, including— 

16 (1) a description of the types of unfair or de17 ceptive acts or practices identified by the Commis18 sion as being targeted at Indian Tribes or members 

19 of Indian Tribes; 

20 (2) a description of the consumer education ac21 tivities of the Commission with respect to such acts 

22 or practices; 

23 (3) a description of the efforts of the Commis24 sion to collaborate with Indian Tribes to prevent 

25 such acts or practices or to pursue persons using 

26 such acts or practices; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1762 RFS

1 (4) a summary of the enforcement actions 

2 taken by the Commission related to such acts or 

3 practices; and 

4 (5) any recommendations for legislation to pre5 vent such acts or practices. 

6 (b) INCREASING AWARENESS OF UNFAIR OR DECEP7 TIVE ACTS OR PRACTICES TARGETING INDIAN TRIBES.— 

8 Not later than 6 months after the date of the submission 

9 of the report required by subsection (a), the Commission 

10 shall update the website of the Commission to include in11 formation for consumers and businesses on identifying 

12 and avoiding unfair or deceptive acts or practices targeted 

13 at Indian Tribes or members of Indian Tribes. 

14 (c) COMMISSION DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

15 ‘‘Commission’’ means the Federal Trade Commission. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 15, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Outer Continental Shelfstatistical summary
 
SuDoc Number:I 72.12/3-3:

Item Number:0671-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000872638
 
2007 | 2008
 
April 1, 2020**
## S K Y K I N G A E R I AL V I S U A LS
205 Bulifants Blvd., Suite B | Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 | 757.229.0557 terence.haglund@skykingav.com

12 November 2015
US Department of Tra nsportation, Docket Operations 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE West Building Ground Floor, Room W12K140 Washington, DC 20590

RE:	Request	for Amendment under	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Modernization	and	Reform	Act and	 Part	 11	 of	 the	 Federal	Aviation	Regulations	 for	 additional	UASs ; Exempti on	# 11958, FAA	Docket	No.	FAA

- 2015

- 1197

Dear Sir or Madam:

Terence G. Haglund, doing business a s Sky King Aerial Visuals, LLC, ( “Petitioner” ) requests an amendment to his Section 333 Exemption
, No. 11958 , Docket FAA

- 2015

- 1197

.
In order to provide th e safest possible service, we consistently look to new and better technology. To meet that need, we would like to add the following UASs to our Section 333 exemption: DJI Phantom 3, DJI s900, DJI s1000, 3DR Solo, FreeFly Alta, and FreeFly CineStar.

Grant of this amendment would not set precedent; all of t hese UASs are standard production models and have been approved by the FAA in other exemptions:
DJI	Phantom	3

• Precedent	setting	exemptions#	11804A,	11728A,	12117,	11447B

• Manual: http://download.dji innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Profe ssional_Quick_Start_Guide_en_v1.2.	pdf

DJI s900

• Precedent setting exemptions# 12301, 12281, 12410, 11914, 11804A

• Manual: http:/ /download.dji

- i nnovations.com /downloads/s900/en/S900_ User_Manual _v1.2_en.pdfDJI s1000

• Precedent setting exemptions# 12301, 12281, 12410, 11184, 11160

• Manual: http://d ownload .dji

- innovations.com downloads/s1000/en/S1000/en/S1000 _User_Manual_v1.10 _en.pdf

3DR Solo

• Precedent setting exemptions #11309A, 11935, 12120, 11240A, 11274A

• Manual: http://3drobotics.com/wpKcontent/uploads/2015/08/v5_08_21_15.pdf
FreeFly Alta

• P recedent setting exemptions #11728A, 12103

• Manual: http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp

- content/uploads /2015/07/28175748 /ALTA

- Manual)RevB.pdf
FreeFly Cinestar

• Precedent setting exemptions # 11804A, 12092, 11253A, 11825

• Manual: http://d27w8s76bjlz9v .c loudfront.net/wpKcontent/uploads2014/07/cinestar8 Manual

- v4.pdf

The above listed UASs will be used in accordance with the conditions and limitations of

ex emption No. 11958 to conduct aerial data collection . The UASs require the same procedures as
the UAS that have already been approved for use , and their use shall be in compliance in all regards with the requ irements set forth in Exemption #11958

.

Peti ti oner thanks you for your time and prompt consideration of the requested amendment for Exemption No. 119 58

. Please do not hesitate to contact Petitioner should you have any questions or should you require any additional information to support the request.

Sincerely,

SKY KING AERIAL VISUALS LLC

Terence G. Haglund
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-225 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Seafood Products 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Signed January 27 and February 25, 2010 

with 

Appendix 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Trade: Seafood Products 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 January 27 and February 25, 2010; 

 Entered into force February 25, 2010. 

 With appendix.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61573-61574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard
[CGD08-97-044]


Houston/Galveston Navigation Safety Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of full committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Houston/Galveston Navigation Safety Advisory Committee 
(HOGANSAC) will hold a special meeting to discuss the proposal by the 
Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) to dredge the Houston Ship Channel 
through Galveston Bay along the east side only. As part of the 
approved, multi-year project to deepen and widen the Houston Ship 
Channel, this proposed east-side-only dredging will occur between 
Bolivar Roads and Five Mile Cut. The meeting will be open to the 
public.

DATES: The meeting of HOGANSAC will be held on Wednesday, November 19,

[[Page 61574]]

1997 at 9:00 a.m. Members of the public may present written or oral 
statements at the meeting.

ADDRESSES: The HOGANSAC meeting will be held in the conference room of 
the Houston Pilots Office, 8150 South Loop East, Houston, Texas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Captain Kevin Eldridge, Executive Director of HOGANSAC, telephone (713) 
671-5199, or Commander Paula Carroll, Executive Secretary of HOGANSAC, 
telephone (713) 671-5164.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given pursuant to 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2.

Agenda of the Meeting

    Houston/Galveston Navigation Safety Advisory Committee (HOGANSAC). 
The tentative agenda includes the following:
    (1) Opening remarks by the Executive Director (CAPT Eldridge) and 
chairman (Tim Leitzell).
    (2) Discussion on the ACOE proposal and comments from the floor.

Procedural

    All meetings are open to the public. Members of the public may make 
oral presentations during the meetings.

Information on Services for the Handicapped

    For information on facilities or services for the handicapped or to 
request special assistance at the meetings, contact the Executive 
Director as soon as possible.

    Dated: October 29, 1997.
T.W. Josiah,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 97-30366 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7110

EDDIE L. BARKSDALE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MS. BASSET, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-1401-1)

Submitted: December 10, 2004 Decided: December 23, 2004

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie L. Barksdale, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Louis Barksdale seeks to appeal the district

court’s order granting the Commonwealth’s motion to dismiss

Barksdale’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and denying his claims

as procedurally defaulted. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Barksdale has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny Barksdale’s motion for appointment

of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Anne MEISELMAN and Bruce Meiselman, Petitioners, v. Hyman WEBMAN and Sylvia Webman d/b/a Ben-Ro Apartments, Respondents.

No. 44230.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 727.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
Annex A

TITLE 204. JUDICIAL SYSTEM GENERAL P ROVISIONS

PART II. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

CHAPTER 29. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Subchapter K. COSTS, FINES AND FEES

§ 29.401a. Consumer Price Index

- costs and fines

.

Pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, and 42 Pa.C.S. § 1721, the

Supreme Court has authorized the Court Administrator of Pennsylvania to obtain and publish in the

Pennsylvania Bulletin on or before November 30 the percentage increase in the Consumer Price

Index for calendar year 20 2 1 as required by Act 96 of 2010 , 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 1725.1(f) and

3571(c)(4)(as amended). See, No. 5 78 Judicial Administrati on Docket.

The Court Administrator of Pennsylvania reports that the percentage increase in the Consumer

Price Index, A ll Urban Consumers, U.S. City Average, for calendar year 202 1 was 7

. 0 % percent.

( See , U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Series CUUROOOOSAO, January 2 4

, 202 2 .)
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350
                            (furnished but not filed)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViaVid Broadcasting Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian
Kathler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Brian Kathler
-----------------



Brian Kathler
Chief Financial Officer
June 24, 2005
#### Joe Lee ATKINS, Jr., alias Peit Black, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-921.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas-New Mexico Power Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott Forbes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Scott Forbes       
|Scott Forbes           
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 4, 2004
Exhibit 1: Page 1 of 2

WESTERN STATES OFFICE AND 

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND

SUSPENSION APPLICATION 

Exhibit 1
Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Redacted by the U.S. Department of the 

Treasury

Western States Office and Professional Employees Pension Fund 

Exhibit 1 

Penalty of Perjury Statement/Public Disclosure Statement 

Pursuant to Sections 2.03 and 2.04 of IRS Revenue Procedure 2016-27, the undersigned Trustees make 

the following two statements: 

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this request, including accompanying 

documents. and, to the best of my knowledge and belief. the request contains all the relevant facts 

relating to the request, and such facts are true, correct, and complete. 

I acknowledge that, pursuant to section 432(e)(9)(G)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code, the application for 

approval of the proposed suspension of benefits, and the application's supporting material, will be publicly 

disclosed through publication on the Treasury Department website. 

Michael Parmelee, Co-Chair 

Authorized Trustee on behalf of the Board of 

Trustees for the Western States Office and 

Professional Employees Pension Fund 

;z -/0 - i7 

Date Date 

Exhibit 1: Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ThinkEngine Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
G. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                  /s/ Michael G. Mitchell
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Michael G. Mitchell
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  May 13, 2008
#### Howard ROMERO v. Philip D. SUNSERI.

No. 62654.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Philip D. Sunseri, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 359 So.2d 305.

Writ denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60342

Summary Calendar

 

HATEM SULIEMAN NASER,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78 177 272

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hatem Naser petitions this court for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) decision finding him inadmissible

under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i), (ii) and, therefore,

statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status and removable. 

He has also moved to expedite our ruling on that petition. Naser

argues that his checking the “citizen or national” box on two I-9

Employment Eligibility Verification forms for the purpose of

securing private employment was an insufficient basis on which to

find him inadmissible. He further argues that the BIA’s decision
No. 04-60342

-2-

to utilize its summary affirmance procedures was inappropriate in

his case.

Substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s

determination that Naser had not borne his burden of showing that

he was “clearly and beyond doubt” not inadmissible under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii). See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194,

197 (5th Cir. 1996); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(2)(A). The issue

whether Naser is inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i)

is pretermitted in light of the determination that substantial

evidence supported the finding that he was inadmissible under

8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii). Finally, we reject Naser’s

argument that we must review the BIA’s use of its streamlined

review process. See Garcia-Melendez v. Ashcroft, 351 F.3d 657,

662 (5th Cir. 2003).

PETITION AND MOTION TO EXPEDITE DENIED.
#### JACKSONVILLE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY v. COMMODORE POINT TERMINAL CO.

No. 38145.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 795.
V 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1894 

For the relief of Stela Simeonova and Simeon Simeonov. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2021 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Stela Simeonova and Simeon Simeonov. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR STELA 

4 SIMEONOVA AND SIMEON SIMEONOV. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Stela Simeonova and Simeon Simeonov shall be eligi8 ble for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 

9 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma10 nent residence upon filing an application for issuance of 

11 an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for 

12 adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1894 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Stela Simeonova 

2 and Simeon Simeonov enter the United States before the 

3 filing deadline specified in subsection (c), they shall be 

4 considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 

5 shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of 

6 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation7 ality Act as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plications for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tions for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate 

12 fees, within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 

13 this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Stela Simeonova and Simeon Simeonov, the Sec17 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 

18 by one, during the current or next following fiscal year, 

19 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail20 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

21 section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 

22 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

23 made available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

24 under section 202(e) of such Act. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1894 IH

1 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

2 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

3 parents, brothers, and sisters of Stela Simeonova and 

4 Simeon Simeonov shall not, by virtue of such relationship, 

5 be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS