alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cadwalader *versus*Tindall.

Cattle received by a tenant to be pastured for hire are not liable to distress for rent due by him.

Error *to the*District Court, *Philadelphia.*

.This was an action of replevin by Tindall *v.*Cadwalader, for certain cattle belonging to the plaintiff, which had been distrained for rent.

Gregg, the tenant of Cadwalader, received cattle to pasture on the land demised, and the cattle of the plaintiff were there in the daytime and sent home in the evening. Whilst on the premises they were distrained for rent due by Gregg. The jury found for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the Court on the point, whether the cattle were in law subject to distress for rent. On the reserved point judgment was entered for Tindall, the plaintiff.

The entry of such judgment was assigned for error.

*Montgomery,*for plaintiff in error.

*D. C. Morris,*for defendant.

*April*8.

Per Curiam.

Where a tenant of land receives the cattle of third persons to be pastured at hire, are they subject to a distress for rent ? Certainly not; else the law of distress would be a mere trap to catch other people’s property. Where, in the course of the tenant’s business, he receives the property of third persons as a means of making a livelihood, it .is not subject to distress.

Judgment affirmed.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-305 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Signed at Seoul January 15, 2009 

and 

 

Agreement Relating to Agreement 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Seoul January 15, 2009 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Defense 

 Agreement signed at Seoul January 15, 2009; 

 Entered into force March 5, 2009. 

 And agreement relating to agreement. 

 Effected by exchange of notes 

 at Seoul January 15, 2009; 

 Entered into force March 5, 2009.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

LEELAND BARNHART,

Petitioner

v.

SUPERINTENDANT [SIC] WINGARD 

(S.C.I. SOMERSET): PENNSYLVANIA 

BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE: 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

(A.D.A. BRIANA VANATA),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 46 WM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See 

Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is 

improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3625 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3625

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide small businesses with 
additional time to file beneficial ownership information, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 18, 2024

 Mr. Scott of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide small businesses with 
additional time to file beneficial ownership information, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Small Business and Prevent 
Illicit Financial Activity Act''.

SEC. 2. BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REPORTING DEADLINES FOR SMALL 
              BUSINESSES.

    Section 5336(b)(1) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by inserting ``(but which may not adjust the 
                report submission deadline)'' after ``Treasury''; and
                    (B) by striking ``in a timely manner, and'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C)--
                    (A) by inserting ``(but which may not adjust the 
                report submission deadline)'' after ``Treasury''; and
                    (B) by striking ``at the time of'' and inserting 
                ``not later than 90 days after the date of such'';
            (3) in subparagraph (D)--
                    (A) by inserting ``(but which may not adjust the 
                report submission deadline)'' after ``Treasury''; and
                    (B) by striking ``in a timely manner, and not later 
                than 1 year'' and inserting ``not later than 90 days''; 
                and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(H) Unable to obtain.--FinCEN may not by rule, 
                guidance, or otherwise, permit a reporting company from 
                submitting a report relating to the inability of the 
                reporting company to obtain or identify information in 
                the alternative to submitting a report required under 
                this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   May  7, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Patricia K. Collawn                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |   | Patricia K. Collawn                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|                                          |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|                                          |   | PNM Resources, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|                                          |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

----
<PAGE>

                                     AMENDMENT TO
                                 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         FIRST AMENDMENT dated August 1, 1996 to Employment Agreement effective
as of January 1, 1996, by and between The Coleman Company, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") and Larry E. Sanford (the "Executive").

         WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement effective as
of January 1, 1996 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement as set
forth herein.

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1.   Section 9(c) is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced with
the following:

              9.(c)  During the time the Executive is employed by the
    Corporation and for a period of two years following the termination of
    such employment for any reason, the Executive will not serve as an
    officer, director or employee, or in any other way assist the efforts
    of, any Significant Competitor.  As used herein, the term "Significant
    Competitor" shall mean any corporation, partnership or entity (i) that
    competes directly against the Corporation in one or more product lines
    with such product lines representing at least 10% of the total sales
    of such competitor, and (ii) where such competing products offered by
    the Corporation constitute at least 10% of the total sales of any
    organization unit of the Corporation (e.g. division or corporate) that
    the Executive has been employed at during the previous 24 months. 
    Notwithstanding anything above, this section shall not prohibit the
    Executive from owning not more than 5% of any publicly traded company. 
    The restrictions on the Executive pursuant to this Section 9(c) shall
    lapse upon any material breach of this Agreement by the Corporation,
    including without limitation, the obligations of Corporation under
    Section 6 COMPENSATION UPON TERMINATION.

<PAGE>

    2.   Executive acknowledges that he has been furnished a copy of Colorado
Revised Statutes Section 8-23-113(2) and he acknowledges that his position is
within the class of "executive and management personnel and officers" which is
excluded from the statute.

    3.   The parties agree that as except as expressly amended hereby, the
Agreement shall be in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the
Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.

                             THE COLEMAN COMPANY, INC.



                             By: /s/ GEORGE E. MILEUSNIC
                                ------------------------------------
                                  Name:  George E. Mileusnic
                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer


                              /s/ LARRY E. SANFORD
                             ---------------------------------------
                                  Larry E. Sanford
#### Alice M. ROUNTREE et al. v. SPRINGER MOTOR CO. et al. ROUNTREE v. SPRINGER MOTOR CO.

No. 39144.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 702.
#### Miriam Ann PEMBERTON, Appellant, v. David S. PEMBERTON, Appellee.

No. 73-453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 1974.

David A. Maney of Gordon & Maney, Tampa, for appellant.

Richard N. Krinzman of Marx and Squitero, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Section 61.14, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; Schulman v. Schulman, Fla.App.3rd, 1973, 273 So.2d 403.

McNULTY, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00454

- CV

JAMARIO BERNARD PICK ETT APPELLANT

V.

AMBER LEE BURKE APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 322ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

----------

Appellant Jamario Bernard Pickett attempts to appeal from a protective

order signed by the trial court on October 8, 2013. Pickett did not file a timely

post

- judgment motion to extend the appellate deadline; therefore, the notice of

appeal was due Novembe r 7, 2013, but was not filed until December 3, 2013.

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). We informed Pickett of our concern that the notice

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

of appeal was untimely and requested that he file a response showing grounds

fo r continuing the appeal, but we have not r eceived a response. See Tex. R.

App. P. 44.3. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; AND GABRIEL, J.

D ELIVERED: February 27 , 2014
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136448 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136448 

 COA: 275656 

Wayne CC: 06-010957-01

GREGORY JOHN WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 59656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Minority Business Development Agency


Native American Business Development Center Applications: 
Cherokee

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; revised dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency is revising the 
announcement to solicit competitive applications to operate its 
Cherokee Native American Business Development Center program to change 
the closing and start dates. The solicitation was originally published 
in the Federal Register on Wednesday, October 1, 1997, 62 FR 51457.

DATES: The revised closing is December 31, 1997, and the revised start 
date is April 1, 1998.

PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: For the exact date, time and location 
contact the Atlanta Regional Office at (404) 730-3300.

ADDRESSES: Mail applications to the U.S. Department of Commerce, 
Minority Business Development Agency, MBDA Executive Secretariat, 14th 
& Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 5073, Washington, DC. 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Henderson at (404) 730-3300.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance: (11.801 Native American 
Program)

    Dated: October 28, 1997.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 97-29108 Filed 11-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61314-61315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-36-000]


Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

November 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 5, 1997, Kern River Gas Transmission 
Company (Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to 
become effective October 1, 1997:

First Revised Sheet No. 91, Original Sheet No. 91-A
First Revised Sheet No. 521, Original Sheet No. 521-A
First Revised Sheet No. 621, Original Sheet No. 621-A
First Revised Sheet No. 724, Original Sheet No. 724-A
Second Revised Sheet No. 810, Original Sheet No. 810-A

    Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order on Remand of Order No. 636-C issued February 27, 
1997 in Docket No. RM91-11-006, et al. Kern River states that it has 
revised its

[[Page 61315]]

right-of-first-refusal tariff provisions to reduce the term cap for 
matching a competitive bid from twenty years to five years in order to 
avoid pregranted abandonment of service.
    Kern River states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
Kern River's jurisdictional customers and upon interested state 
regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest this filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30080 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 Date: August 6, 2010
    /s/ James P. AllenJames P. AllenExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7303
DANIEL L. STALEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; RICKY HARRISON, Warden, in his official capacity; LIEUTENANT SEWARD, in his individual capacity; LIEUTENANT MILLER, in his individual capacity; LIEUTENANT JENKINS, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 04-7304
DANIEL L. STALEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOE SEWARD, Lieutenant in unofficial capacity; RICKY HARRISON, Warden in official capacity; KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendants - Appellees.- 2 - No. 04-7305
DANIEL L. STALEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; LIEUTENANT MILLER; RICKY HARRISON, Warden, in his official capacity; LIEUTENANT JENKINS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-3490-9-23; CA-03-3491-9-23; CA-03-3492-9-23) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005 Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel L. Staley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Penn Engen, MCCUTCHEN, BLANTON, JOHNSON & BARNETTE, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Daniel L. Staley appeals from the orders of the district court in these three actions, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). The district court referred these cases to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). In each case the magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), and advised Staley that failure to file specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based on the recommendation. Despite this warning, in each case Staley failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Staley has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Hondo Minerals Corporation 10-K/A




Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Hondo Minerals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending July 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William R. Miertschin, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ William R. MiertschinBy: William R. MiertschinChief Executive Officer




Dated: October 16, 2013




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.