alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
                                                                                           EXHIBIT 11.1

                                          VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                       (Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)

<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended              Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,                   September 30,
                                                      1996            1995            1996            1995

<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER
 SHARE ASSUMING NO DILUTION:
   Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $   13,146      $   22,630      $   53,901      $   46,911 
   Less:  Preferred stock dividend requirements. .     (2,844)         (2,967)         (8,526)         (8,895)

   Net income applicable to common stock . . . . . $   10,302      $   19,663      $   45,375      $   38,016 
 
   Weighted average number of shares of
     common stock outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . 43,983,599      43,681,606      43,877,733      43,632,905 

   Earnings per share assuming no dilution . . . . $      .23      $      .45      $     1.03      $      .87 

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER
 SHARE ASSUMING FULL DILUTION:
   Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $   13,146      $   22,630      $   53,901      $   46,911 
   Less:  Preferred stock dividend requirements. .     (2,844)         (2,967)         (8,526)         (8,895)
   Add:  Reduction of preferred stock 
     dividends applicable to the assumed 
     conversion of Convertible Preferred Stock . .      2,695           2,695           8,086           8,086 

   Net income applicable to common stock 
     assuming full dilution  . . . . . . . . . . . $   12,997      $   22,358      $   53,461      $   46,102 

   Weighted average number of shares of
     common stock outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . 43,983,599      43,681,606      43,877,733      43,632,905 
   Weighted average common stock
     equivalents applicable to stock options . . .    229,801         401,255         407,319         371,228 
   Weighted average shares issuable upon
     conversion of Convertible Preferred Stock . .  6,381,798       6,381,798       6,381,798       6,381,798 

   Weighted average shares used for computation. . 50,595,198      50,464,659      50,666,850      50,385,931 

   Earnings per share assuming full dilution . . . $      .26<F1>  $      .44<F2>  $     1.06<F1>  $      .91<F1>

<FN>
<F1>  
This calculation is submitted in accordance with paragraph 601(b)(11) of Regulation S-K although it is 
contrary to APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces an antidilutive result.

<F2>
This calculation is submitted in accordance with paragraph 601(b)(11) of Regulation S-K although it is 
not required by APB Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
</FN>
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1787 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1787

   To prevent unnecessary delay in firearms transfers from licensed 
                firearms dealers to unlicensed persons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

Mr. Clyde (for himself, Mr. Harris, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Davidson, Mr. Good 
  of Virginia, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Perry, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. 
Carter of Georgia, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Allen, and 
 Ms. Tenney) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prevent unnecessary delay in firearms transfers from licensed 
                firearms dealers to unlicensed persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Second Amendment Freedoms 
are Executed Timely Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PROLONGED DELAY OF TRANSFER CAUSED BY THE 
              GOVERNMENT.

    Section 922(t)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code is amended by 
striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
            ``(ii) 3 calendar days have elapsed since the licensee 
        contacted the system, and the system has not notified the 
        licensee that the receipt of a firearm by such other person 
        would violate subsection (g) or (n) of this section; and''.
                                 <all>
```
IW17PF_554
IW17PF_555
IW17PF_556
IW17PF_557
IW17PF_558
IW17PF_559
IW17PF_560
IW17PF_561
IW17PF_562
IW17PF_563
IW17PF_564
IW17PF_565
IW17PF_566
IW17PF_567
IW17PF_568
IW17PF_569
IW17PF_570
IW17PF_571
IW17PF_572
IW17PF_573
IW17PF_574
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           3,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,046
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,573
<PP&E>                                          11,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,024
<BONDS>                                          2,705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,156
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,763)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,798
<SALES>                                         34,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,433
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (484)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    939
<INCOME-TAX>                                        53
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       824
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 21
- 00403
- CV

__________________ WAL
- MART STORES TEXAS, LLC , Appellant
V.
TONY PEAZLEY , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 163rd District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. B210209
- C

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER Wal

- Mart Stores Texas, LLC , appellant, filed an unopposed motion to stay the trial court proceedings pending completion of the appeal. On Dec ember 1 , 2021, the trial court signed an order denying a motion to stay litigation and compel
arbitration. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.01 6 . On Dec ember 20 , 2021, Wal

- Mart Stores Texas, LLC perfected an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order. See id

. ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b).2 When an accelerated appeal from an interlocutory order is perfected, we may make such orders as are necessary to preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. After reviewing the unopposed motion, we find that temporary orders are necessary to preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the appeal. It is ORDERED that all trial court proceedings are STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further order of this Court. See id

. ORDER ENTERED January12, 2022

. PER CURIAM Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
No. 00-619.

#### Regal Cinemas, Inc. *v.*City of Mayfield Heights et al.

Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.
March 25 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE ESTATE OF THO MAS ALFRED LERA, SR. , DECEASED

NO. 14

- 12

- 01071

- CV

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant’ s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on November 20 , 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of t his appeal be paid by appellant, Janice D. Loyd, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Thomas A. Lera. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below f or observance.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29775]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Concession Contract Negotiations: National Preserve; Correction

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Correction to public notice, proposal to award concession 
permits, Wrangell--St. Elias National Preserve.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a correction to the public notice that 
was published Friday, October 17, 1997 (62 FR 54127-54128). That notice 
advertised the National Park Service's proposal to award 17 concession 
permits authorizing the operation of sport hunting guide-outfitter 
services for the public at Wrangell St. Elias National Preserve.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent, Wrangell St. Elias National Park and Preserve, P.O. Box 
439,Copper Center, Alaska 99573.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    The Summary action of the notice published on Friday, October 17, 
1997 (62 FR 54127-54128) incorrectly stated that the existing permits 
expire by limitation of time on December 31, 1997 and that the term of 
the proposed new permits will be for ``a period of five years from 
January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2002.'' The Effective Date was 
stated ``December 16, 1997''.

Correction of Notice

    The existing permits expire by limitation of time on December 31, 
1998, and proposed new permits will have a term of five years from 
January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2003. The date applications are 
due has been extended from December 16, 1997 to January 15, 1998.
Paul Anderson,
Acting Regional Director, Alaska Region.
[FR Doc. 97-29775 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 23, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-399

Lower Tribunal No. 21-5946

________________

Vladimir Rolando Avalos,

Appellant,

vs.

Amaury Diaz Velarde,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark 

Blumstein, Judge.

Marrero, Chamizo, Marcer Law, LP, and David T. Valero, for appellant.

Green, Matzner & Kellner, P.A., and Jay B. Green (Boca Raton); 

Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Elizabeth K. Russo, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Brookie v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 213 So. 3d 1129, 

1131-32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ("Appellee[ ] did not violate any legal duty to 

Appellant, who observed the condition but was injured by failing to use due 

care for his own safety . . . . Appellee[ ] owed no duty to warn Appellant of 

the open and obvious condition, because Appellees' knowledge of the 

condition was not ‘superior’ to Appellant's.").
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Act, as amended 
(5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting 
of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute or Mental Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: December 2, 1997.
    Time: 4 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Shirley H. Maltz, Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; Telephone: 301-443-3936.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282).

    Dated: November 6, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29854 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Dividends

Page &P of &N

# Footnotes

Page &P of &N

# CPP Missed Payments

Page &P of &N

# CPP MP Footnotes

Page &P of &N

# CDCI Missed Payments

Page &P of &N
#### Margaret S. BUIE, Appellant, v. Jack Walter BUIE, Appellee.

No. 70-164.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 77D - DWS High Income Fund
(a series of DWS High Income Series)

At a meeting held May 4-5, 2009, the
Board of Trustees of DWS High Income
Fund (the "Fund"), approved a proposal
to change the portfolio maturity policy
of the Fund such that the dollar-
weighted effective average portfolio
maturity of the Fund will not exceed
ten years.

C:\Documents and Settings\e444940\
Local Settings\Temporary Internet
Files\OLK8B\Exhibit 77D High
Income Series.doc
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61498-61499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-162-005]


Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership; Notice of Tariff Filing

November 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 6, 1997, Cove Point LNG Limited 
Partnership (Cove Point) tendered for filing to become a part of Cove 
Point's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following 
revised tariff sheets to be effective November 1, 1997:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 99
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 136

    Cove Point states that these tariff sheets are being filed to 
comply with the Commission's Office of Pipeline Regulation's letter 
order of October 27, 1997, requiring: (1) GISB standards being 
incorporated by reference to reflect Version 1.1 of GISB's standards; 
and (2) Cove Point to incorporate GISB Standard 1.3.28 by reference or 
through verbatim incorporation of this standard into Cove Point's 
tariff, but not by both means.

[[Page 61499]]

    Cove Point states that copies of the filing were served upon Cove 
Point's customers and interested state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All protests filed with the Commission will be considered 
by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not 
serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30185 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 accompanying this  certification
and filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Geoffrey F. Feidelberg,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 9, 2005

                                            /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       39
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, Martin A. Roenigk, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CompuDyne Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I,  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's   auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  registrant's  board  of
directors:

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

     Date: August 13, 2007
                                                         /s/ Martin Roenigk
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Martin Roenigk
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                       39
#### LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALABAMA and George O. Howard, Jr., Appellants, v. Andrew M. PRUSINSKY, Appellee.

No. 70-428.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.4

 

**Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As AdoptedPursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CenovusEnergy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Ivor M. Ruste, Executive Vice-President & ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |

 

 
| By:    | /s/  Ivor M. Ruste                                           |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Ivor M. Ruste                                                |   |
|   | Executive  Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

February 18,2010

 

 

----
#### Donal G. GALLENTINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1090.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.