alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30385]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 62 FR 60510, 
November 10, 1997.
    Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: 10:00 a.m. 
Wednesday, November 12, 1997.
    Change in the Meeting: The following topic was added to the open 
portion of the meeting:
    <bullet> Discussion of Federal Home Loan Banks Salary Caps for 1998
    The Board determined that agency business required its 
consideration of this matter on less than seven days notice to the 
public and that no earlier notice of this change in the subject matter 
of the meeting was possible.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.
William W. Ginsberg,
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 97-30385 Filed 11-14-97; 1:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
# BLIIIJE 

# CHROMA**·,vn~** S 10•**P~li:SO,..:.L** f.10u" i.J A ON,.**~A~** OM -n;:; • 

## MANUAL


# J

.... c.au. -
#### James Lester BIGGS, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Respondent.

No. 70-934.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 18, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2013

No. 04-13-00454-CV and 04-13-00455-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF S.S.,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013MH1871 and 2013MH1959

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On March 27, 2013, appellant filed a motion to consolidate appeal cause numbers 04-13-

00454-CV and 04-13-00455-CV. Appellant’s Certificate of Conference states appellant’s 

counsel attempted to confer with the State, but was informed no attorney in the Bexar County 

District Attorney’s Office has yet been assigned to the appeals. We have reviewed the cases, and 

agree the two cases are similar enough to treat them as one case. 

Therefore, the motion is GRANTED and it is ORDERED that the two cases shall be 

consolidated for briefing and argument purposes (if argument is requested and granted). The 

parties shall file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the two appeals were one case, but 

shall put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. The records, however, shall remain 

separated. If oral argument is requested and granted, both cases shall be argued together, as a 

single appeal, and the total time limit for each side at oral argument shall equal the ordinary time 

limit for a single appeal. The court will dispose of the entire case with the same judgment, 

opinion, and mandate. 

Maria E. Fattahi, who is the court reporter responsible for preparing, certifying, and filing 

the reporter’s record in both cases, is reminded that the records were due July 22, 2013.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of July, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE ANTHONY HERNANDEZ and SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY 

OF ILLINOIS a/k/a SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, 

INC.,

Appellants,

v.

REBECCA L. HEIKKA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-0905

[April 4, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carlos A. Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-09-

039965-14.

J. Pablo Cáceres and Hudson Jones of Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig 

LLP, Tampa, for appellant Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois a/k/a 

Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, Inc.

Kenneth D. Cooper, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois appeals from a final judgment 

awarding Rebecca Heikka $361,775 in attorney’s fees and costs pursuant 

to section 627.428, Florida Statutes (2017) and as a sanction under 

section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2017). Although we agree with Appellant 

that the trial court erred in awarding fees under section 627.428, the error 

was harmless because the trial court properly awarded fees under section 

57.105. We accordingly affirm without further comment.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., and MAY, J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan

Item #3 

Does the application include a penalties-of-perjury statement signed by an authorized trustee on 

behalf of the board of trustees. 

See section 2.03. 

The required statement is attached as document number 3.

3.0
3.1

Signature redacted by the US 

Department of the Treasury
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Sal Gilbertie, President and Principal Executive Officer of Teucrium Trading, LLC, the Sponsor of Teucrium Commodity Trust (the “Registrant”), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Registrant’s report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





By:
/s/Sal GilbertieSal GilbertiePresident/Principal Executive OfficerTeucrium Trading, LLC, Sponsor of Teucrium Commodity Trust





Date:  March 29, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project Nos. 459-088, 090 & 091]


Union Electric Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

November 5, 1997.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA analyzes the environmental impacts of approving three non-
project lands applications at the Osage Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 
459. The Osage Hydroelectric Project is on the Osage River in Benton 
and Camden Counties, Missouri. Its reservoir is the Lake of the Ozarks. 
The applications reviewed in the EA include: (1) A permit to dredge 
4,000 cubic yards (cy) of sediment and construct a new marina, (2) a 
permit to dredge 600 cy of sediment and construct a new boat ramp, and 
(3) a permit to dredge 4,500 cy of gravel to reduce flooding of 
adjacent properties and install 500 feet of riprap to protect an 
eroding streambank. These permits are for work in the Gravois Arm, mile 
78.7, and Indian Creek Arm of Lake of the Ozarks, respectively
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Commission staff conclude that 
approving the licensee's applications to grant the three permits would 
not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the 
quality of the human environment. Copies of the EA can be obtained by 
calling the Commission's Public Reference Room at (202) 208-1371.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29682 Filed 11-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-97, RM-9047]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mt. Juliet and Belle Meade, TN

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies a Petition for Reconsideration filed by 
the Cromwell Group, Inc. directed to the Report and Order in this 
proceeding which reallotted Channel 294A from Mt. Juliet to Belle 
Meade, Tennessee, and modified the Station WNPL construction permit to 
specify Belle Meade as the community of license. See 62 FR 40949, July 
31, 1997. With this action, the proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 19, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau (202) 
418-2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order adopted October 22, 1997, and released 
October 31, 1997. The full text of this decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC 
Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3805, 1231 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-30281 Filed 11-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### AAACON AUTO TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant, v. Mildred MEGNA, Appellee.

No. 73-302.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1973.

Albert S. Lefkowitz of Zola & Zola, New York City, and Steven Fine, Ft. Lau-derdale, for appellant.

E. Hugh Chappell, Jr., of Walsh, Dolan & Krupnick, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

OWEN, Chief Judge.

Appellant, an interstate motor carrier subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, Title 49, U.S.C., while entrusted with appellee’s automobile to transport it from Massachusetts to Florida, negligently damaged the vehicle. Appellee recovered judgment for the damage to the vehicle and for attorney’s fees.

Appellant assigned error to the award of attorney’s fees and the sole issue properly before us on this appeal is whether an interstate carrier who becomes liable under Section 20(11) of the Interstate Commerce Act for damage to property is thereby liable for attorney’s fees to the property owner under Section 8 of the Act.1 This question was decided many years ago by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Riverside Mills, 1911, 219 U.S. 186, at page 208, 31 S.Ct. 164, at page 171, 55 L.Ed. 167, wherein that court, referring to Section 8 of the Act stated:

> “But that section applies to cases where the cause of action is the doing of something made unlawful by some provision of the act, or the omission to do something required by the act, and there is a recovery ‘of damages sustained in consequence of any such violation of this act,’ etc. The cause of action in the present case is not for damages resulting from ‘any violation of the provisions of this act’ . . . But the cause of action was the loss of the plaintiff’s property which had been entrusted to it as a common carrier, and that loss is in no way *45traceable to the violation of any provision of the act to regulate commerce. Having sustained no damage which was a consequence of the violation of the act, this section has no application to this case.”

The final judgment is modified by deleting therefrom that portion awarding to the plaintiff attorney’s fees in the sum of $1,000.00, and as thus modified the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed, as modified.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

1

. “ § 8. Liability in damages to persons injured by violation of law.

> In ease any common carrier subject to the provisions of this chapter shall do, cause to be done, or permit to be done any act, *matter, or*tiling- in this chapter prohibited or declared to be unlawful, or shall omit to do any act, matter, or thing in this chapter required to be done, such common carrier shall be liable to the person or persons injured thereby for the full amount of damages sustained in consequence of any such violation of the provisions of this chapter, together with a reasonable counsel or attorney’s fee, to be fixed by the court in every case of recovery, which attorney’s fee shall be taxed and collected as part of the costs in the case.”
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 accompanying this  certification
and filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Martin Roenigk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 13, 2007

                                                         /s/ Martin Roenigk
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Martin Roenigk
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                       41
<PAGE>

                                AMENDMENT TO
                             EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         FIRST AMENDMENT dated August 1, 1996 to Employment Agreement effective
as of January 1, 1996, by and between The Coleman Company, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") and George Mileusnic (the "Executive").

         WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement effective as
of January 1, 1996 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement as set
forth herein.

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1.   Section 9(c) is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced with
the following:

              9.(c)  During the time the Executive is employed by the
    Corporation and for a period of two years following the termination of
    such employment for any reason, the Executive will not serve as an
    officer, director or employee, or in any other way assist the efforts
    of, any Significant Competitor.  As used herein, the term "Significant
    Competitor" shall mean any corporation, partnership or entity (i) that
    competes directly against the Corporation in one or more product lines
    with such product lines representing at least 10% of the total sales
    of such competitor, and (ii) where such competing products offered by
    the Corporation constitute at least 10% of the total sales of any
    organization unit of the Corporation (e.g. division or corporate) that
    the Executive has been employed at during the previous 24 months. 
    Notwithstanding anything above, this section shall not prohibit the
    Executive from owning not more than 5% of any publicly traded company. 
    The restrictions on the Executive pursuant to this Section 9(c) shall
    lapse upon any material breach of this Agreement by the Corporation,
    including without limitation, the obligations of Corporation under
    Section 6 COMPENSATION UPON TERMINATION.

<PAGE>

    2.   Executive acknowledges that he has been furnished a copy of Colorado
Revised Statutes Section 8-23-113(2) and he acknowledges that his position is
within the class of "executive and management personnel and officers" which is
excluded from the statute.

    3.   The parties agree that as except as expressly amended hereby, the
Agreement shall be in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the
Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.

                                       THE COLEMAN COMPANY, INC.



                                       By: /s/ Larry E. Sanford
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Name: Larry E. Sanford
                                           Title: EVP



                                           /s/ George Mileusnic
                                           -----------------------------------
                                               George Mileusnic
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Proteonomix, Inc.. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 26, 2010
#### Mary NASH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-331.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 22, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4031-000]


New York State Electric & Gas Corporation; Notice of Filing

November 7, 1997.
    Take notice that New York State Electric & Gas Corporation filed on 
October 30, 1997 the revised Summary of Quarterly Activity (the 
``Summary'') for the calendar year quarter ending June 30, 1997 
pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 824d 
(1985), and part 35 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 18 CFR part 35, and in accordance with Ordering Paragraph J 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's June 9, 1997 order (the 
``Order'') in Docket No. ER97-2518-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before November 21, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29950 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### DATA PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. MARY CARTER INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-60.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 17, 1972.

*25Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellant.

Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court which comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness is hereby affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2








Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted


pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Accretive Health, Inc (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”), the undersigned, John T. Staton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:








|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: February 29, 2012








/s/  John T. StatonJohn T. StatonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
  U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
              SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned, Brian J. Kelley, the Chief Executive
Officer of Cognitronics Corporation (the "Company"), has
executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2006  (the "Report").  The undersigned hereby certifies that:
	(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of
	Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
	of 1934; and
	(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly
	presents, in all material respects, the financial
	condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATED this 14th day of August, 2006


						/s/ Brian J. Kelley
						Brian J. Kelley
						Chief Executive Officer


                                           A signed original of this
                                           written statement required by
                                           Section 906 has been provided
                                           to the Company and will be
                                           retained by the Company and
                                           furnished to the Securities and
                                           Exchange Commission or its
                                           staff upon request.