alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2992]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act; Meeting

Agency Meeting
    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
February 3, 1997.
    A closed meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 5, 1997, at 
10:00 a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a) 
(4), (8), (9)(i) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled 
matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Johnson, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
February 5, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., will be:

    Injunction and settlement of injunctive actions.
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.

    Commissioner Johnson, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: January 31, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2992 Filed 2-3-97; 2:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Alexander JOHNSON, III, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary Jane JOHNSON, Derry Brown Johnson, Charles Raminez, and Richard Joel Weaver, Appellees.

Nos. FF-487 and FF-488.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 25, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1978.

*903Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Terry N. Silverman, Robert Augustus Harper, Jr., Larry G. Turner, Gainesville, Jack T. Edmund, and John R. Howes, Bar-tow, for appellees.

McCORD, Chief Judge.

The state appeals an order granting ap-pellees’ motion to dismiss an amended information with prejudice. The trial court ruled that the state had failed to bring appellees to trial within the time allowed by the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191, even though appellees were continuously ready for trial during the period. We reverse.

Appellees were arrested on December 15, 1976, on charges of possession of cannabis. The arrest records show they were arrested for possession of more than five grams. On December 30, 1976, the state filed an information charging each of the appellees with possession of cannabis with intent to deliver on December 15. The charge did not specify whether the possession was of more or less than five grams. On March 16, 1976, the state filed two amended informations severing Alexander Johnson from the other appellees and adding allegations that each appellee’s possession was of over five grams and each delivery was for consideration. Appellees then each filed motions for discharge alleging that the speedy trial period had run without trial even though .they were continuously available. On April 7, 1976, leave of court to file the amended informations was granted, nunc pro tunc to March 16. Also, on April 7, 1976, the court granted appellees’ motion for discharge.

The original information only charged a misdemeanor since it did not specify that appellees were in possession of more than five grams of cannabis. *Patterson v. State,*313 So.2d 712 (Fla.1975); *Franklin v. State,*346 So.2d 137 (Fla. 1 DCA 1977). The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to try the case under the original information, but upon the filing by the state of the amended informations pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.140(j) charging felonies, the circuit court acquired full jurisdiction and the 180-day trial period from the time of arrest applicable to felonies became applicable. The trial court therefore erred in dismissing the amended informations.

REVERSED.

BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-21-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes In FERC Gas Tariff

October 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 29, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2, the 
tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing to become effective 
December 1, 1997.
    Texas Eastern asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Stipulation and Agreement filed by Texas Eastern in Docket 
Nos. RP88-67, et al. (Phase II/PCBs) and with Section 26 of Texas 
Eastern's FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1.
    Texas Eastern states that such tariff sheets reflect a small 
increase in the PCB-Related Cost component of Texas Eastern's currently 
effective rates. For example, the increase in the 100% load factor 
average cost of long-haul service under Rate Schedule FT-1 to Market 
Zone 3 is $0.0015/dth.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were served on firm 
customers of Texas Eastern and interested state commissions. Copies of 
this filing have also been mailed to all parties on the service list in 
Docket Nos. RP88-67, et al. (Phase II/PCBs) and to all current 
interruptible shippers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29325 Filed 11-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.5
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texas-New Mexico Power Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(each registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ W. Douglas HobbsW. Douglas HobbsPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
Texas-New Mexico Power Company
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 4:39 PM

To: 'mmckinnon@mckennalong.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA); Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha 

(FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information

February 11, 2015 

Mr. Mark E. McKinnon 

McKenna, Long, and Aldridge, LLP 

1676 International Drive, Penthouse 

McLean, VA 22102 

Dear Mr. McKinnon: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0962). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the size of the aircraft for the proposed UAS operation. 

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum. This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual. 

 Provide description of proximity to airports. 

 Your petition references a pre-flight inspection and/or checklist. Describe the process used to determine 

if the UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS. 

 Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft 

record. Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain 

its UAS and ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the 

petitioner has elected to maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and 

inspection recommendations. 

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the 

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials: 

o Erie Operations Manual 

o DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Flight and Maintenance Manual 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 
2

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by February 25, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRANDON WAYNE MOORE,

 Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00119-CR

Appeal from the

272nd District Court

of Brazos County, Texas

(TC# 14-01424-CRF-272)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brandon Wayne Moore has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. Rule 42.2(a) permits an 

appellate court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the appellant’s motion at any time before the 

court’s decision. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). Finding that Appellant has complied with the 

requirements of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

April 24, 2015

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3839 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3839

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 203 East 6th Street in Lexington, Nebraska, as the ``Bill Barrett 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2024

 Mr. Ricketts (for himself and Mrs. Fischer) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 203 East 6th Street in Lexington, Nebraska, as the ``Bill Barrett 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BILL BARRETT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 203 East 6th Street in Lexington, Nebraska, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Bill Barrett Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bill 
Barrett Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
----

**EXHIBIT      32.4**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred      |
|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Charles                N. Eldred          |
|                             |   | Senior                Vice President, and |
|                             |   | Chief                Financial Officer    |
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

** Certification**

** **I, W. Douglas Hobbs, certifythat:

1.         I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Texas-New Mexico Power Company;

2.         Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.        Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.         The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter (each registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

----

5.        The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  November 3, 2005 

/s/ W. Douglas HobbsW. Douglas Hobbs,Chairman, President andChief Executive OfficerTexas-New Mexico PowerCompany
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 52477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26867]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 52477]]


                Presidential Determination No. 97-39 of September 30, 
                1997

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 1322(c) of 
                the
                National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996
                (Public Law 104-106)

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

                By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and 
                laws of the United States of America, I hereby delegate 
                to the Secretary of Defense the duties and 
                responsibilities vested in the President by section 
                1322(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
                Fiscal Year 1996 (``the Act'') (Public Law 104-106, 110 
                Stat. 478-479 (1996)).

                The reporting requirement delegated by this memorandum 
                may be redelegated not lower than the Under Secretary 
                level. The Department of Defense shall obtain 
                concurrence on the report from the following agencies: 
                the Department of Commerce, the Department of State, 
                the Department of the Treasury, and the Director of 
                Central Intelligence on behalf of the intelligence 
                community prior to submission to the Congress.

                Any reference in this memorandum to the provisions of 
                any Act shall be deemed to be a reference to such Act 
                or its provisions as may be amended from time to time.

                The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 30, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-26867
Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
Billing code 5000-04-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1651 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1651

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-one

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the CARES Act to extend the sunset for the definition of a 
             small business debtor, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Bankruptcy Relief Extension 
Act of 2021''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSIONS.
    (a) In General.--Section 1113 of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) 
is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)(5) (11 U.S.C. 1182 note), by striking ``1 
    year'' and inserting ``2 years''; and
        (2) in subsection (b)(2)(B) (11 U.S.C. 101 note), by striking 
    ``1 year'' and inserting ``2 years''.
    (b) Modification of Plan After Confirmation.--
        (1) Section 1329(d)(1) of title 11, United States Code, is 
    amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
    ``this subsection'' and inserting ``the COVID-19 Bankruptcy Relief 
    Extension Act of 2021''.
        (2) Section 1113(b)(1)(D)(ii) of the CARES Act (11 U.S.C. 1329 
    note) is amended by striking ``this Act'' and inserting ``the 
    COVID-19 Bankruptcy Relief Extension Act of 2021''.
SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.
    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```