alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Moran, Respondent, *vs.*D. A. January, Appellant.

1. *Practice, civil*— New *trials*— Motions.—The motion for a new trial must be made within four days after the trial, if the term shall so long continue, and if not, then before the end of the term.

*•Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.*

*Thos. Grace, and John Hallum,*for Respondent.

If a party against whom a verdict is found and judgment given fail to file his motion for a new trial within the four days prescribed by the statute, but- subsequently files his motion, which is overruled, no writ of error will lie from the judgment overruling the motion. *(W%*S., 1059, § 6; Richmond’s Adm’x vs. Wardlaw, 36 Mo., 313 ; Nordmanser vs. Hitchcock, 40 Mo., 178; Frederick vs. Rice, 46 Mo., 24; State vs. Marshall, 36 Mo., 400.)

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case a judgment was regularly rendered for the plaintiff, and twelve days after the rendition of the same, and without leave of court, a motion was filed for a new trial.

The motion was overruled. The statute provides that all motions for new trials or in arrest of judgment shall be made within four days after the trial, if the term shall so long con-tinue, and if not, then before the end of the term. (2 W. S. 1059, § 6.)

Under the above section the uniform course of decision has been, that unless the motion is filed within the four days prescribed, no writ of error or appeal will lie’from the judgment of the court overruling the same. (State vs. Marshall, 36 Mo., 400 ; Richmond vs. Wardlaw, 36 Mo., 313 ; Banks vs. Lades, 39 Mo., 406 ; Bishop vs. Ransom, 39 Mo., 416 ; Farmers Bank vs. Bayliss, 41 Mo., 274 ; Long vs. Towl, 41 Mo., 398 ; Morgner vs. Kister, 42 Mo., 466.)

It follows therefore, that the appeal must be dismissed.

The other Judges concur.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary S. Hirstein, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International FuelTechnology, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructionscontained in SEC Release 33-8760; 34-54942];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: May 7, 2007       By: /*s/ Gary S. Hirstein*       Gary S. Hirstein  Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
afom_ex1026.htm

EXHIBIT 10.26

 

 

 

 


	 
	1

	


	 



 

 


	 
	2

	


	 



 

 


	3
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Steven C. McNeal, Vice President and Treasurer of Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of November 6, 2009 between Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 22, 2018





By:  /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
20

21

19

18

18

19

21

20

20

21

19

18

20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2

20 18 16 14 12

20

19

21

40 32

30 28

38 36 34 30 28

40 38 36 34 32

0

10 8 6 4 2 0

26 24 22 20

26 24 22 20

meters

meters

West

East

TRENCH 07S SOUTH WALL

rk

07-S01

10

Tan very fine sandy clayey

silt with 1-15% fine gravel 

Black blocky silty clay u30s

u20s Interbedded coarse sands

and gravels, historical?

u40s

u10s

u40s

Plow zone/ historic A-horizon

Plow zone/ historic A-horizon Plow zone/ historic A-horizon

Plow zone/ historic A-horizon

u30s

u20s

u10s

u30s

u20s

u10s

u30s

u20s

u10s

u30s

u20s

u10s

ABBREVIATIONS

rk rock

EXPLANATION

Gray brown sandy silty 

clay(no gravel)

Contact––Dashed, approximate;

 dotted, inferred

Unit number, trench 07S only, 

not correlated to trench 07N

Radiocarbon sample location

u10s

07-S01

Inferred fault location based on apparent warp on u10s and 

velocity step in seismic refraction analysis of Kimball (2005)

2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 FEET

2 1 0 2 METER Manuscript approved for publication January 13, 2012

This map was printed on an electronic plotter directly from digital files. Dimensional calibration may vary between electronic plotters and

between X and Y directions on the same plotter, and paper may change size due to atmospheric conditions; therefore, scale and

proportions may not be true on plots of this map.

For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services, Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, 1-888-ASK-USGS

Available on World Wide Web at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1011/ 

Any use of trade, firm, or product names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.

Government

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey 

Open-File Report 2012-1011

Sheet 3 of 5

Pamphlet accompanies map

Logs and Data from Trenches Across and Near the Green Valley Fault 

 at the Mason Road Site, Fairfield, Solano County, California, 2006-2009

By

James J. Lienkaemper, Robert R. Sickler, Shannon A. Mahan, Johnathan Brown, Liam M. Reidy, and Mindy A. Kimball

2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000021828
<NAME>                                COLONIAL COMMERCIAL CORP.

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                  1,032,874
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                          16,330,506
<ALLOWANCES>                            1,030,549
<INVENTORY>                            10,820,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       28,287,155
<PP&E>                                  5,518,077
<DEPRECIATION>                           (745,133)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         40,018,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  27,381,422
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                74,800
<COMMON>                                   78,602
<OTHER-SE>                              9,793,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           40,018,858
<SALES>                                45,042,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       45,042,267
<CGS>                                  32,638,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          32,638,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          309,744
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,158,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (1,750,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                               61,588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (1,811,882)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           (1,811,882)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1.18)



</TABLE>
#### Willie Lee RAMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-5.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Joseph A. Scarlett, Special Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
No. 00-825.

#### MindGames, Inc. *v.*Western Publishing Co., Inc.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      5, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Charles N. Eldred                |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Charles      N. Eldred                    |
|                                   |   | Executive      Vice President and         |
|                                   |   | Chief      Financial Officer              |
|                                   |   | Public      Service Company of New Mexico |

----
#### The FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Edward B. JOHNSON, Jr., Respondent.

No. 40563.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 22, 1971.

Patrick A. Podsaid, Coral Gables, and Arnold Nevins, Miami Beach, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

*291Harold Peter Barkas, Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The referee on February 18, 1971, filed his report recommending certain disciplinary actions against the respondent, Edward B. Johnson, Jr., a member of The Florida Bar.

The accused lawyer has not sought review as permitted by Rule 11.09(3) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A. The recommendation of the referee is, therefore, approved and accordingly respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded and directed to show, instanter, to the satisfaction of the Bar that he has instituted an accounting system which will permit complete control of monies entrusted to him. Respondent is further ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $640.50.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, A. C. J., and CARLTON, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary R. Abramowicz, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of County Bancorp, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: March 28, 2016

 

|                         |                        |        |
|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                    | /s/ Gary R. Abramowicz |   |
| Gary R. Abramowicz      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
Checklist Item #24 Application for Approval of a Suspension of 

Benefits Under MPRA

Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund EIN: 51-0161467

Plan No.: 001

Does the application 

indicate whether the plan 

sponsor is requesting 

approval from the PBGC 

of a proposed partition 

under section 4233 of 

ERISA. 

See section 6.02.

The application filed on behalf of the Iron Workers 

Local 17 Pension Fund does not include a request 

for partition under ERISA Section 4233.

IW17PF_260
### ENCLOSURE 3 **PUBLIC PA RTICIPA** 

**TION RECORD** T he complete record of public participation activities is located at the Air Division of the Department of Environmental Quality. The d epartment contact to access this information is the Director, Air Division . The state did not receive testimony on this particular revision . TEMPLATES \SIP - REG \ REG03 - b2 SIP\ NONATTN PLANS \20 10 \ K08 - SIP - 3.DOC
#### SHOPPING CENTERS DEVELOPERS, INC., Appellant, v. Louis Joseph MOTTO d/b/a Dimensional Decor, Appellee.

No. 71-431.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 23, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Lamar Warren, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**Size and Weight Basic Parameters**  **Operating Temperature**

- 10°C ~ 50°C **Power Consumption** 3.12W **Take -**  **off Weight** <1200g **Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode)** Vertical: 0.8m Horizontal: 2.5m **Max Yaw Angular Velocity** 200°/s **Max Tilt Angle** 45° **Max Ascent / Descent Speed**  6m/s **Max Flight Velocity** 10m/s**Diagonal distance (m otor center to m**  **otor center)** 350mm **Phantom Prop Guard**  Weight(Single):18.7g Size(Single): Angle(155.0°) Radius(112.32mm) Whole Size with Four Prop Guards: 575.5mm

**ESC Sound Introduction Ready**  ♪123456 7 **Throttle stick is not at bottom** BBBBBB... **Input signal abnorm al**  B

—— –B

—— – B... **Input voltage abnorm al**  BB

—BB

— BB

— BB... **Charger & Battery Parameters**  **Charger AC Input**

100
- 240V **Charge Current** 1A/2A/3A**Current Drain for Balancing** 200mA **Power** 20W **Battery Type** LiPo

**TX Parameters**  **Working Frequency**

2.4GHz I SM **Control Channels** 7 Channels **Communication Distance** 1000m **Receiver Sensitivity** ( **1%PER** ) >
- 100dBm **Power Consumption of TX** < 20dBm **Working Current /Voltage**52 mA@6V **AA Battery** 4 Required
#### Succession of George H. SPINKS v. Tommie SMOTHERS.

No. 61966.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Tommie Smothers, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Iberville.

Writ denied.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, Ronald J. Radcliffe, Chief Financial Officer of Empire Resorts,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




March
      17, 2008By:
            /s/
      Ronald J. RadcliffeRonald
      J. RadcliffeChief
      Financial Officer
255 La. 478

#### Bud C. ALFORD v. KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION, et al.

No. 50364.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1970.

In re: Bud C. Alford applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Bernard. 229 So.2d 372.

Writ refused. 1 On the facts as found by the Court of Appeal, the judgment is correct.

FOURNET, C. J., and BARHAM, J.,

are of the opinion the writ should be granted. The Court of Appeal facts reveal that an accident occurred and that the injury ensuing was symptomatic, i. e., heart pain. They merely opine after this factual discussion that there was no accident. They have rejected Bertrand v. Coal Operators Cas. Co., 253 La. 1115, 221 So.2d 816 under a pretext that their issue is whether an accident occurred rather than whether there was causal connection between the accident and disabiliy.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

Petitioner

* Misc. Docket AG

v.

 * No. 32

EDWARD GONZALEZ

* September Term, 2019

Respondent

CORRECTED ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance 

Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Edward Gonzalez, to suspend the 

Respondent from the practice of law indefinitely for violating Rules 1.4(b), 1.16(d) and 

8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, and the record herein, it 

is this 27th day of September, 2019;

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Edward 

Gonzalez, be suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland indefinitely; and 

it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Edward Gonzalez

from the registry of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the trustees of the Client 

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State 

in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761. 

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

ELEANOR REGINELLI AND ORLANDO 

REGINELLI 

 v. 

MARCELLUS BOGGS, M.D., AND 

MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL, 

INC. AND UPMC EMERGENCY 

MEDICINE, INC., D/B/A EMERGENCY 

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. 

PETITION OF: MONONGAHELA VALLEY 

HOSPITAL, INC. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 39 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2016, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are 

GRANTED, limited to the following issues, as stated by petitioners: 

1. Whether the Superior Court erred by holding an outside medical provider’s 

peer review proceedings regarding its employees who staff a hospital’s 

Emergency Department under a contract with that hospital are not entitled 

to protection from disclosure under the Pennsylvania Peer Review 

Protection Act? 

2. Whether the sharing of peer review records by a third-party medical 

provider that operates a hospital’s Emergency Department with the 

administration of that hospital constitutes a waiver of peer review 

protection as to those records? 

3. Whether a hospital that contracts with a third-party medical provider to 

operate the hospital’s Emergency Department may claim protection under 

the Peer Review Protection Act for records of peer review proceedings 
[39 WAL 2016] - 2 

conducted by the medical provider regarding its employees who staff the 

hospital’s Emergency Department? 

These matters are to be listed for argument with the petitions granted at 40, 41 & 

42 WAL 2016.
*Ct»vdUWW) 1 ^^r^(^^F^^^PPBALS

'Xb'VVve-Mor^orAVW- \jiAa.e_ dX Sa?xcA(Loui«A: *r^

cA
My5^oY| A*£JX3&C(?A) ^JcOiCj^L^^'* ^

CvCwO

bOc^

in

ft£^

k

A^A* i^ApaA^MvA^Q^aAo\4& *-i>3.StA vV\ .\Ak)CXe>LCjni n .

__ _ %„ .._ _oo\^o^°A<^^TWjreyeir(f^lVp^

^
0\^C_iaC.Vs, Vc^ do€rCenM,£_4W2*J!^^O^o\-bOrAAr*\r, S^'Y^dL

ejoc^><

^7\r

U^A. ^ •• in \ x

£JLA~oto &/oA NAAoAa\^jv\ AiaA?caa\ OoVvCj^t^^^Xon^^c^eA^^

CLWYxo^^^CWjiA UAArs_2&eA\ 0\S\r\(APA^^KoX^rr^iALffixjiKAjt

Ci)
#### James Lee TOLBERT, Jr. v. Monroeby Tolbert HELMS.

No. 50323.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 14, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 26, 1978.

James Lee Tolbert, Jr., pro se.

S. H. Long, Tupelo, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

Affirmed.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-820 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Status of Forces 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CROATIA 

Signed at Washington April 3, 2008 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 CROATIA 

 Defense: Status of Forces 

 Agreement signed at Washington April 3, 2008; 

 Entered into force August 20, 2008.
#### Eddie Lee FULGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-483.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week of 
November 7, 1997

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

Docket Number: OST-97-3080
Date Filed: November 3, 1997
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    PTC23 EUR-JK 0017
    Europe--Japan/Korea Expedited Resos
    r-1--002s r-3--074i
    r-2--071ee r-4--250j
    Intended effective date: December 15, 1997

Docket Number: OST-97-3081
Date Filed: November 3, 1997
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    PTC12 Telex Mail Vote 897
    Portugal-Canada Fares r1-4
    r-1--044j r-3--070gg
    r-2--064j r-4--076kk
    Intended effective date: January 1, 1998.
Paulette V. Twine,
Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-30226 Filed 11-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P