alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Satellite Reconnaissance

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Open Systems will meet 
in closed session on November 18-19, 1997 at Strategic Analysis, Inc., 
4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia. In order for the Task Force 
to obtain time sensitive classified briefings, critical to the 
understanding of the issues, this meeting is scheduled on short notice.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will examine the benefits of, criteria for, and obstacles to the 
application of an open systems approach to weapon systems, and to make 
recommendations on revisions to DoD policy, practice, or investment 
strategies that are required to obtain maximum benefit from adopting 
open systems. The Task Force should examine application to new defense 
programs, to those that have already made substantial investments in a 
design, and to those that are already fielded, across the spectrum of 
weapon systems, not just those heavily dependent on advanced computers 
and electronics.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concern matters listed 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly this meeting will 
be closed to the public.

    Dated: November 10, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternative OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of 
Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-30046 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Number of Families

(thousands)

Amount of Credit

($millions)

Average Credit

($)

Alabama 144 242 1,685

Alaska 20 44 2,188

Arizona 181 289 1,598

Arkansas 53 75 1,431

California 1,210 1,872 1,547

Colorado 151 295 1,952

Connecticut 127 256 2,018

Delaware 35 63 1,817

District of Columbia 18 22 1,257

Florida 782 1,223 1,564

Georgia 372 611 1,641

Hawaii 44 77 1,749

Idaho 56 100 1,791

Illinois 425 794 1,867

Indiana 196 343 1,747

Iowa 95 182 1,926

Kansas 80 141 1,768

Kentucky 125 214 1,706

Louisiana 143 231 1,617

Maine 40 74 1,844

Maryland 187 344 1,841

Massachusetts 213 425 1,996

Michigan 335 612 1,829

Minnesota 201 377 1,874

Mississippi 82 127 1,547

Missouri 206 361 1,755

Montana 26 44 1,718

Nebraska 55 99 1,804

Nevada 67 112 1,670

New Hampshire 34 58 1,712

New Jersey 319 567 1,778

New Mexico 54 68 1,268

New York 677 1,256 1,854

North Carolina 265 444 1,676

North Dakota 17 25 1,465

Ohio 372 688 1,850

Oklahoma 79 126 1,609

Oregon 128 212 1,651

Pennsylvania 372 742 1,993

Rhode Island 36 68 1,921

South Carolina 119 203 1,698

South Dakota 24 45 1,882

Tennessee 188 309 1,646

Texas 851 1,368 1,608

Utah 119 198 1,666

Vermont 15 29 1,882

Virginia 245 450 1,836

Washington 208 347 1,665

West Virginia 30 48 1,599

Wisconsin 183 371 2,025

Wyoming 16 19 1,187

Other 22 30 1,396

All 10,039 17,319 1,725

Notes:

The sum of all families and all credits do not add to the total due to rounding.

Distribution of American Opportunity Tax Credit by State

Tax Year 2012

State

American Opportunity Tax Credit

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Tax Analysis

April 30, 2015
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 January 30, 2006 Before Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
No. 04-1996 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee , v. ERIC J. JOHNSON Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. No. 3:03 CR 83 Robert L. Miller , Jr. , Chief Judge

.

O R D E R Eric Johnson pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base. He raised only one issue on appeal before this court, which was whether his Sixth Amendment rights wereviolated when he was sentenced to 210 months in prison under the then-mandatorySentencing Guidelines. We directed a limited remand pursuant to the procedures set forth in United States v. Paladino , 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005). The district court ha s informed us that it would impose the same sentence under the now-advisory Guid elines. In so doing, the district court clearly and thoroughly evaluated all of the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 and determined that Johnson’s “stunning criminal record,” “the need for the sentence to UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53No. 04-1996 Page 2

reflect the seriousness of the offense and to provide just punishment and to promote respect for the law, [and] the need to protec t the public from Mr. Johnson” justify his sentence of 210 months, the bottom of the properly calculated sentencing range. Sentencing ranges properly calculatedunder the Guidelines are presumptively reasonable, see United States v. Mykytiuk , 415 F.3d 606 (7th Cir.2005). Both Johnson and the government had the opportunity to file memoranda about the reasonableness of Johnson’s sentence, in light of the dist rict court’s statement. The government took advantage of that invitation, arguing that the sentence is reasonable, particularly in light of Johnson’s criminal history and the amount of crack he possessed (87.53 grams). Johnson did not file a response and ther efore has not rebutted the presumption of reasonableness. Nor does our independen t review suggest that the sentence is unreasonable. The judgment is therefore A FFIRMED .
Exhibit 32.1 

**Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

     In connection with Coastal Caribbean Oils &  Minerals, Ltd.’s (“Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB  for the period ended June 30, 2003 (“Report”), I certify that:

| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of, and for the period ended, June 30, 2003. |

Date: August 13, 2003 

/s/ PHILLIP W. WARE**Phillip W. Ware  President, Chief Executive Officer & Treasurer**

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                       390
<INVENTORY>                                      5,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,233
<PP&E>                                           7,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,666
<BONDS>                                         15,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,098
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,799
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,935
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,681
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald Lynn Collins certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Collins Industries, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|Dated: | March 10, 2004 | /s/ Donald Lynn Collins       
|------ | -------------- | ------------------------------
|       |                | Donald Lynn Collins, President
|       |                | and Chief Executive Officer   





#
Exhibit 99.1

                Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors of Commonwealth Gas Company:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance sheet of Commonwealth Gas
Company as of September 30, 1999 and the related condensed statements of
income for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999 and
condensed cash flows for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999.  We
did not perform a review of the condensed statements of income for the three
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and cash flows for the nine-
month period ended September 30, 1998.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for accounting
and financial matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying financial statements in order for them to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


Hartford, Connecticut                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
November 15, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1865 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1865

 To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to provide for 
   grants in support of training and education to teachers and other 
  school employees, students, and the community about how to prevent, 
recognize, respond to, and report child sexual abuse among primary and 
                       secondary school students.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

 Ms. Wild (for herself, Mr. McCaul, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. 
Raskin, Ms. Scanlon, and Mr. Lamb) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to provide for 
   grants in support of training and education to teachers and other 
  school employees, students, and the community about how to prevent, 
recognize, respond to, and report child sexual abuse among primary and 
                       secondary school students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jenna Quinn Law''.

SEC. 2. CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AWARENESS FIELD INITIATED GRANTS.

    Section 105(a) of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 
U.S.C. 5106(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) Child sexual abuse awareness field initiated 
        grants.--The Secretary may award grants under this subsection 
        to entities, for periods of up to 5 years, in support of field-
        initiated innovation projects that advance, establish, or 
        implement comprehensive, innovative, evidence-based or 
        evidence-informed child sexual abuse awareness and prevention 
        programs by--
                    ``(A) improving student awareness of child sexual 
                abuse in an age-appropriate manner, including how to 
                recognize, prevent, and safely report child sexual 
                abuse;
                    ``(B) training teachers, school employees, and 
                other mandatory reporters and adults who work with 
                children in a professional or volunteer capacity, 
                including with respect to recognizing child sexual 
                abuse and safely reporting child sexual abuse; or
                    ``(C) providing information to parents and 
                guardians of students about child sexual abuse 
                awareness and prevention, including how to prevent, 
                recognize, respond to, and report child sexual abuse 
                and how to discuss child sexual abuse with a child.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1824 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1824

  To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to air cargo in 
                  Puerto Rico, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2021

 Miss Gonzalez-Colon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to air cargo in 
                  Puerto Rico, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Puerto Rico Air Cargo Industry 
Empowerment Act''.

SEC. 2. CARGO IN ALASKA OR PUERTO RICO.

    Section 41703(e) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading by inserting ``or Puerto 
        Rico'' after ``Alaska''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or Puerto Rico'' after ``Alaska'' each 
        place it appears.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1757 

To permit shuttered venue operators to receive shuttered venue operator 

grants and paycheck protection program loans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2021 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To permit shuttered venue operators to receive shuttered 

venue operator grants and paycheck protection program 

loans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boosting Revenue As5 sistance for Venue Operators Act’’ or the ‘‘BRAVO Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHUTTERED VENUE OPERATOR PAYCHECK PRO7 TECTION PROGRAM LOAN ELIGIBILITY. 

8 Section 324 of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small 

9 Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act (Public Law 116– 

10 260) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1757 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1)(A)(vi)— 

2 (A) by striking subclause (III); 

3 (B) by redesignating subclause (IV) as 

4 subclause (III); and 

5 (C) in subclause (III), as so redesignated, 

6 by striking ‘‘(I), (II), and (III)’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘(I) and (II)’’; 

8 (2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as 

9 subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and 

10 (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol11 lowing new subsection: 

12 ‘‘(e) NON-DUPLICATION.—A recipient of a loan guar13 anteed under paragraph (36) or (37) of section 7(a) of 

14 the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) may receive 

15 a grant under this section only if such grant is used for 

16 purposes other than paying payroll costs and other obliga17 tions described in section 7(a)(36)(F) of the Small Busi18 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(F)).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Checklist Item #21 Application for Approval of a Suspension of 

Benefits Under MPRA

Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund EIN: 51-0161467

Plan No.: 001

Does the application 

describe how the plan 

sponsor took into account - 

or did not take into account 

- in the determination that

all reasonable measures

have been taken to avoid

insolvency the impact of

• benefit and

contribution levels

on retaining active

participants and

bargaining groups

under the plan, and

• past and

anticipated

contribution

increases under the

plan on employer

attrition and

retention levels.

See section 5.03.

The Board of Trustees for the Iron Workers Local 

17 Pension Fund did consider the impact of 

making changes to the contribution rate and 

determined that this was not a reasonable

measure to take at this time to avoid insolvency. 

Specifically, the Board of Trustees determined that

the potential increase in contributions is 

detrimental to the continuing support of the active 

participants. These participants, if allowed to 

invest their current contribution in a defined 

contribution plan, would have $19,000 per year 

invested. Even in the unlikely event of a 50% loss 

in the market, they would end up with an $8,000 

contribution to their own accounts, not merely a 

$50.00 credit. While this argument does not reflect 

the long term value of the defined benefit plan over 

the defined contribution plan, it is one faced by the 

Board of Trustees in communicating with the 

participants and beneficiaries. 

The Trustees believe that the current contribution 

rates are even detrimental to attracting new active 

participants; however, if the Suspension Plan is 

approved, at least the participants and 

beneficiaries will have the ability to receive the 

benefits and not be subject to the reductions that 

will occur upon insolvency.

The Trustees believe that the current contribution 

rates are sustainable for the contributing 

employers; however, increases will continue to 

erode the employer base. In 2013, the Board of 

Trustees received notice from several employers 

that they were terminating their Collective 

Bargaining Agreement and obligation to contribute 

to the Pension Fund. Several of these employers 

are no longer performing iron work, but others 

have continued performing iron work under a new 

National Agreement entered into with the Iron 

IW17PF_248
Workers International Union. Others have 

reassigned the work to other trades with lower 

pension contributions. The increase of the 

contribution rate will only cause more employer to 

withdraw in 2018 upon the expiration of the current 

Collective Bargaining Agreement. It is the hope of 

the Trustees, that the implementation of the 

Suspension Plan will reassure the contributing 

employers so they continue to support this 

Pension Fund. 

IW17PF_249