alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of The European Equity Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSR; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| March 2, 2009 | /s/Michael G. Clark            |
|---------------|--------------------------------|
|          | Michael G. Clark               |
|          | President                      |
|          | The European Equity Fund, Inc. |

 

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of The European Equity Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSR; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| March 2, 2009 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|---------------|---------------------------------------|
|          | Paul Schubert                         |
|          | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|          | The European Equity Fund, Inc.        |
Exhibit 10.1







Information Concerning Executive Compensation







On January 3, 2018, the Compensation Committee of HomeFed Corporation (the “Company”) approved annual salary increases (effective January 1, 2018) and discretionary 2017 cash bonuses for each of the Company’s executive officers who were included as named executive officers in the Company’s 2017 proxy statement.







	
Name and Title

	 	
Base Salary in 2018

	 	 	
Bonus Award for 20171

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Paul J. Borden

	 	
$

	
398,585

	 	 	
$

	
308,895

	
2 


	
President and

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Chief Executive Officer

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
John Kent Aden, Jr.

	 	
$

	
326,101

	 	 	
$

	
259,591

	 
	
Vice President

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Christian E. Foulger

	 	
$

	
250,628

	 	 	
$

	
257,371

	 
	
Vice President

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Erin N. Ruhe

	 	
$

	
239,152

	 	 	
$

	
207,034

	 
	
Vice President,

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Treasurer and Controller

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 



 


____________________________


1 Includes a previously approved holiday bonus paid to each of the named executive officers based on a percentage of salary of $11,723 for Mr. Borden, $9,591 for Mr. Aden, $7,371 for Mr. Foulger and $7,034 for Ms. Ruhe.


2 Also includes a previously approved gross-up bonus of $47,172 for Mr. Borden as reimbursement for taxes payable on travel, commuting and lodging expenses.
<PAGE>
Form of Lock Up Agreement
Exhibit 10.7

                                December 31, 2002


Vital Living, Inc.
5080 N. 40th Street, Suite 105
Phoenix, Arizona 85018

Dear Sirs:

      Reference is made to that certain Confidential Private Placement
Memorandum (the "Memorandum") dated as of October 28, 2002 (as may be
supplemented from time to time) relating to the sale of securities by Vital
Living, Inc. (the "Company") through selected agents including Aegis Capital
Corp and HCFP Brenner Securities.

      This letter will confirm that I will not, without your prior written
consent, sell, transfer, , or otherwise assign, whether directly or indirectly
(other than with respect to a family member), the shares of common stock of the
Company owned by me, whether owned at this time or acquired at a subsequent date
through the exercise of any options or warrants, or acquired from the Company or
in open market transactions, for a period (the "Lock-up Period") expiring on the
earlier to occur of (a)120 days following the effective date of any registration
statement filed in respect of the securities sold pursuant to the Memorandum
(the "Effective Date", or (b) November 20, 2003. In addition, after the
expiration of the Lock-Up Period, and until the earlier to occur of the one year
anniversary of the Effective Date or February 20, 2004, I will not sell in
excess of 40,000 shares per month in any calendar month.

      Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Lock-up Period shall expire immediately
prior to the occurrence or consummation of any transaction involving the direct
or indirect sale or exchange by the shareholders of the Company of a majority of
the voting stock of the Company; a merger or consolidation of the Company with
or into another entity; the sale, exchange or transfer of all or substantially
all of the assets of the Company to any person other than a parent or subsidiary
of the Company; a liquidation or dissolution of the Company to any person other
than a parent or subsidiary of the Company; or any similar liquidity event
involving the Company or its shareholders.

                                Very truly yours,


                                [               ]
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT 99 (2)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils &
Minerals, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Daniel W. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date:  May 12, 2003                           By /s/ Daniel W. Sharp
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Daniel W. Sharp
                                              Treasurer and Chief Accounting and
                                              Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and will be retained by
Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.02
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial Corp.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Salek,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C.
1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   By:
              /s/ William SalekName:
              William
      SalekChief
      Financial OfficerDate: August 8, 2008
#### Judith Marie Burt QUINN v. Stanley Wayne QUINN.

Civ. 1222.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 9, 1977.

*926Alvin B. Foshee, Clanton, for appellant.

Scott Q. Kirkland, Montgomery, for ap-pellee.

HOLMES, Judge.

This is a child custody case.

The mother and father were divorced in 1976. The divorce was granted on answer and waiver and by agreement of the parties. Custody of the two year old female child was to be with the mother. Some few months after the divorce, the father petitioned the trial court for custody of the child. He alleged, among other things, that since the divorce the mother had been admitted and confined for a period of time in a state mental hospital.

After an *ore tenus*hearing, where numerous witnesses testified, the trial court modified the prior decree of divorce and awarded custody of the child to the father. The mother appeals, contending the trial court erred in its action in granting custody of the child to the father. We affirm.

We do not deem it necessary to set out in detail the facts as revealed by the record. Suffice it to say that viewing the evidence with the attendant presumption of correctness accorded the trial court’s decision, the following is revealed.

There was evidence that after the decree of divorce, the mother was a patient in a mental hospital. Furthermore, there was evidence that the mother drank intoxicating beverages, took drugs, and had sexual relations outside marriage. There was also evidence that the mother did not properly care for the child; specifically, that the child’s health was impaired as a result of the mother’s neglect. Furthermore, there was testimony that the mother had been charged with a felony.

Additionally, there was evidence that since the divorce the father had become an active church member; that he had remarried and had a small child as a result of the marriage. The father’s present wife specifically testified that she loved the minor child and would care for the child.

As noted earlier, we review judgments of this sort with a presumption of correctness. See *Wambles v. Coppage,*Ala.Civ.App., 333 So.2d 829 (1976); *Snellings v. Snellings,*272 Ala. 254, 130 So.2d 363 (1961). Furthermore, in this instance, the award of custody is a matter for the exercise of judicial discretion by the trial judge and this court will reverse only where the trial judge is plainly and palpably wrong. See *Parsons v. Parsons,*Ala.Civ.App., 337 So.2d 765 (1976).

Clearly, as indicated from the above, we can find no such error. In addition to the above, the mother argues that this court is required to reverse the trial court in that the trial court made no find*927ings of fact. We know of no mandatory requirement that the trial court make findings of fact in a case of this nature. Absent such a statute, the court renders findings in its discretion. See 2 *Lyons Alabama Practice,*§ 52.2 (1973).

The case is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WRIGHT, P. J., and BRADLEY, J., concur.
#### Lawrence BRIL, Appellant, v. Joyce Samantha Hudson BRIL, Appellee.

No. 73-1277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### NORTH-SOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. The CITY OF MIAMI SPRINGS, Appellee.

No. 73-529.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 12, 1974.

John P. Bond, Miami, for appellant.

Robert C. Lane, John G. Fletcher, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See City of Miami Beach v. Wiesen, Fla.1956, 86 So.2d 442.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Case No. 5D 21

- 2490 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 027018

- A DIDEROT S UFFRENA ,

Appellant ,
v. STATE O F F LORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed April 12, 20 22 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Brevard Cou nty , Tesha Ballou, J udge. Jeremiah D

. A llen, of

T he Law O ffice of Jer emiah D. A llen, P .A., O rlando, f or Appellant. Ashley Moody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahas see, an d Robin A. C ompton, Assis tant A ttorney General, Dayt ona Beac h, f or Appellee.

PER CUR IAM. A FFIRMED.

E VANDER , EDWARDS and SASSO , JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Dennis JOHNSON.

No. 60740.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: Dennis Johnson, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ not considered. Not timely filed.

TATE, J.,

concurs. The initial delay within which to file this application expired on September 1st. An extension was not granted until September 28th. Although I disagree with the interpretation we have held that the trial court does not have jurisdiction to grant an extension after one initial or properly extended delay has expired.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Coachmen Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph P. Tomczak, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
          and for the period(s) covered in the Report.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | By: /s/  Joseph P. Tomczak                          
| | Joseph P. Tomczak                                   
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 5, 2004
ffg_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1

 

Binding Director Term Sheet

 

Effective December 26, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) Harold Kestenbaum (the “Director”) and First Foods Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”), represented by the majority of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (collectively the “Parties”), enter into this Binding Term Sheet (the “Term Sheet”) as follows:

 

Responsibilities and Consideration:

 


	- 	The Director will continue to serve on the Board of Directors of the Corporation and be responsible for day to day duties for the benefit of the Corporation.
	
 
	
 

	- 	The Director’s compensation may consist of share-based and/or cash-based compensation.
	
 
	
 

	- 	The Director’s cash-based compensation for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 will be $10,000 per quarter paid on a date determined by the majority vote of the Board of Directors.
	
 
	
 

	- 	The Director’s share-based compensation for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 will be a one-time award of warrants (the “Warrants”); the terms of which will be detailed in a forthcoming Warrant Agreement (the “Warrant Agreement”). In principle, the Warrant Agreement will include the following terms:



 


	
 
	
o
	Number and Type – The Director is entitled to a one-time award of Warrants for 40,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) of the Corporation, as equal to five (5) shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock (the “Common Stock”), including liquidation preference over Common Stock.
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
o
	Duration – The Warrants entitle the Director to purchase the Preferred Stock from the Corporation, after January 1, 2018 (the “Original Issuance Date”) and before December 31, 2024.
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
o
	Purchase Price - The Purchase Price is $0.51 per share of Preferred Stock.
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
o
	Vesting - The Warrants are subject to a 12-month period whereby the Warrants vest in equal monthly increments from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Vesting period”).



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Term Sheet as of the Effective Date.

 


	
 
			
FIRST FOOD GROUP, INC. 
	
 

	
 
			
 
		
 

	
By: 
	
/s/ Harold Kestenbaum 
		
By:
	
/s/ Mark J. Keeley 
	
 

	
 
	
Harold Kestenbaum
	
 
	
 
	
Mark J. Keeley
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
   
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Abraham Rosenblum
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Abraham Rosenblum
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 20, 2022

No. 04-19-00244-CR

Christopher KINES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-07-153-CRW

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This court’s opinion in this appeal issued on April 15, 2020. After the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals refused appellant’s petition for discretionary review, this court’s mandate 

issued on December 28, 2020. Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting a copy of the 

reporter’s record for purposes of filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. This court has 

no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See TEX. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07; In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, 

orig. proceeding). Post-conviction writs of habeas corpus are to be filed in the trial court in 

which the conviction was obtained, and made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. See 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. In order to obtain a free copy of the record, appellant would 

need to file a motion in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained and demonstrate that 

his claim is not frivolous and that the record is needed to decide the issues presented. See United 

States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 326 (1976); Escobar v. State, 880 S.W.2d 782, 783 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no pet.). Appellant’s motion is DENIED without prejudice to 

seeking relief in the proper court.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of July, 2022.

FILE COPY
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.4








Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted


pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Accretive Health, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Peter Csapo, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 5, 2015


/s/ Peter Csapo


Peter Csapo


Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
OSWER/OSRTI 

Washington, DC 20460 

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL)

***Final Site*** March 2010 

CHEMETCO Madison County, Illinois 

 Site Location: 

Chemetco is located approximately two miles south of the Village of Hartford, Madison County, Illinois. 

 Site History: 

Chemetco was a former secondary copper smelter operation which operated from 1969 to 2001. The former smelter 

property occupied more than 230 acres of land, but operated on 41 acres located near the smelter operations. 

Chemetco’s major function was recycling or secondary processing of copper-bearing scrap and manufacturing 

residues. This process produced waste byproducts such as slag, zinc oxide (scrubber sludge), and spent refractory 

brick. On October 31, 2001, the facility was shut down, and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on November 13, 2001. 

On December 7, 2001 the Illinois EPA issued an order to seal Chemetco. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants: 

Approximately 452,254 cubic yards of waste slag material have been stockpiled on the northeast corner of the facility 

property. Approximately 62,204 cubic yards of zinc oxide (scrubber sludge) has been identified as being located in 

five separate areas on the Chemetco property, including a 2.5 acre concrete bunker located at the north end of the 

facility. Elevated levels of cadmium, copper and lead have been found in the waste slag material and the zinc oxide. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

Elevated levels of cadmium, copper and lead have been found in the sediments collected from the wetlands and Long 

Lake downstream of Chemetco. 

 Response Activities (to date): 

Chemetco fenced the 41 acres near the smelter operations to secure the site. 

 Need for NPL Listing: 

The State of Illinois referred the site to EPA because lead, cadmium and zinc have been detected in wetlands and Long 

Lake downstream of Chemetco. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at this 

time because Chemetco is bankrupt. EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.] 

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.