alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00454-CV

JAMARIO BERNARD PICKETT APPELLANT

V.

AMBER LEE BURKE APPELLEE 

----------

FROM THE 322ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Jamario Bernard Pickett attempts to appeal from a protective 

order signed by the trial court on October 8, 2013. Pickett did not file a timely 

post-judgment motion to extend the appellate deadline; therefore, the notice of 

appeal was due November 7, 2013, but was not filed until December 3, 2013. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). We informed Pickett of our concern that the notice 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

of appeal was untimely and requested that he file a response showing grounds 

for continuing the appeal, but we have not received a response. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 44.3. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; AND GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: February 27, 2014
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00175

- CR

Kyle Scott Huffman

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 9

o f Tarran t County (1276840 )

July 24, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgmen t. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Anne Gardner

__________ Justice Anne Gardner
**November 26,** **2013 No.** **04-13-00757-CV MICHAEL** **TATSCH, Appellant** **V. CHRYSLER** **GROUP, LLC** **AND INFINITY** **COUNTY MUTUAL** **INSURANCE COMPANY.** **Appellees From** **the 216th** **Judicial District** **Court, Gillespie** **County, Texas** **Trial Court** **No. 12977** **Honorable N.** **Keith Williams,** **Judge Presiding** 

### ORDER**After reviewing** **the parties'** **addendums to** **the Civil** **Docketing Statement** **in the** **above numbered** **and styled** **appeal, this** **court has** **determined that** **this dispute** **is appropriate** **for referral** **to an** **Alternative Dispute** **Resolution (ADR)** **procedure. See** **Tex. Civ.** **Prac. Rem.** **Codi 154.021** **(Vernon 2005).** **All further** **communications with** **this court** **by the** **parties regarding** **ADR shall** **be directed** **to the** **Clerk of** **the Court** **for any** **assistance in** **the mediation** **process.**

### All**parties are** **ORDERED to** **respond in** **writing by** **December 13,** **2013, stating:** **(1) the** **name, address,** **and fee** **schedule of** **the mediator** **of their** **choice; or** **(2) that** **they cannot** **agree on** **mediator, in** **which case** **the court** **will appoint** **one; or** **(3) any** **objection to** **mediation and** **the reasons** **for such** **objection. See** **id. 154.022** **(b). Provided** **the parties** **submit to** **mediation, this** **court will** **issue an** **order suspending** **all appellate** **deadlines for** **forty-five (45)** **days in** **order that** **the parties** **may concentrate** **on the** **scheduling and** **completion of** **the mediation** **process. Is** **it so** **ORDERED on** **November 26,** **2013. Sandee** **Bryan Marion,** **Justice**

## iwlEREOF,**have hereunto** **set my** **hand and** **affixed the** **seal of** **the said** **26] 20f** **3. ottle,** **Clerk"**
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-721.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

Prohibitions or Restrictions on the 

Use of Incendiary Weapons 

(Protocol III) 

 Protocol Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS to the 

Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the 

Use of Certain Conventional Weapons which may 

be deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to have 

Indiscriminate Effects of October 10, 1980 

Adopted at Geneva October 10, 1980 

 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 MULTILATERAL 

 Weapons: Prohibitions or Restrictions on the 

 Use of Incendiary Weapons (Protocol III) 

Protocol to the convention on prohibitions or restrictions on the use 

 of certain conventional weapons which may be deemed to be 

 excessively injurious or to have indiscriminate effects 

 of October 10, 1980. 

Adopted at Geneva October 10, 1980; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate January 7, 1997 (Treaty Doc. 105-1, 

 105th Congress, 1st Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-22, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 23, 2008; 

Ratification of the United States of America deposited January 21, 2009; 

Entered into force July 21, 2009.
#### James Herschel FOSTER and Aubrey Lee Foster, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. J-163.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 8, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 6, 1969.

*727Jackson Bryan, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Atty.Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst.Atty.Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Dunbar v. State, 220 So.2d 366 (Fla.1969).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit (j)

   CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the references to our firm under the caption "Financial
Highlights" in the DWS Alternative Asset Allocation Plus Fund Prospectuses and
"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and "Financial Statements" in
the DWS Alternative Asset Allocation Plus Fund Statements of Additional
Information and to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment
Number 33 to the Registration Statement (Form N-1A, No. 333-43815) of our report
dated May 26, 2009, on the financial statements and financial highlights
included in the DWS Alternative Asset Allocation Plus Fund Annual Report dated
March 31, 2009.

                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
July 27, 2009

<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit (j)

   CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the references to our firm under the caption "Financial
Highlights" in the DWS Disciplined Long/Short Growth Fund Prospectuses and
"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and "Financial Statements" in
the DWS Disciplined Long/Short Growth Fund Statements of Additional Information
and to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment Number 33 to
the Registration Statement (Form N-1A, No. 333-43815) of our report dated June
22, 2009, on the financial statements and financial highlights included in the
DWS Disciplined Long/Short Growth Fund Annual Report dated April 30, 2009.

                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
July 27, 2009
No. 9891.

#### Baker, Admx., *v.*The Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

(Decided October 16, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

*576*Mr. C. W.' Dille, Mr. E. J. Pinney*and *Mr. C. W. Noble,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs: Cook & McGowan,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: NCI Scholars Program.
    Date: November 18, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Ramada Inn--Rockville, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Gerald Lovinger, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 630C, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, Telephone: 301/496-7987.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review, discuss and evaluate grant 
applications.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: November 6, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-29852 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 354

- C R



### ____________________

JASON BLACKWELDER

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 410th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 13

- 09

- 10342 CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jason Blackwelder filed a notice of appeal but he did not make pay ment

arrangements for the clerk’ s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). The appellant

has been represented by retained counsel and he did not file an affidavit of

indigence . The appellant is not entitled to proceed without p ayment of costs. See

Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. On October 13, 2014, we notified the parties that t he appeal

would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No

response has been filed. There being no satisfactory explanation fo r the failure to2 file the clerk’ s record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.

App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISS ED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on December 9, 2014

Opinion Delivered December 10, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 58981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-28923]



[[Page 58981]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Availability of Plan of Operations and Environmental Assessment 
for Drilling and Production of 3 Gas Wells; Mesa Operating Company 
(Lake Meredith National Recreation Area), Hutchinson County, TX

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 9.52(b) of Title 
36 of the Code of Federal Regulations that the National Park Service 
has received from Mesa Operating Company a Plan of Operations for the 
Drilling and Production of 3 gas wells within Lake Meredith National 
Recreation Area, Potter County, TX.
    The Plan of Operation and Environmental Assessment are available 
for public review and comment for a period of 30 days from the 
publication date of this notice in the Office of the Superintendent, 
Lake Meredith National Recreation Area/Alibates Flint Quarries National 
Monument, 419 East Broadway, Fritch, TX. Copies are available from the 
Superintendent, Lake Meredith National Recreation Area/Alibates Flint 
Quarries National Monument, Post Office Box 1460, Fritch, TX 79036 and 
will be sent upon request, subject to a charge for copying.

    Dated: October 17, 1997.
John Benjamin,
Superintendent, Lake Meredith National Recreation Area/Alibates Flint 
Quarries National Monument.
[FR Doc. 97-28923 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
**EXHIBIT 35.1********SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**Re:    DCFS  USA  LLC  in  its  capacity  as  Servicer  under  the  Sale  and  Servicing  Agreement,  dated  as  of October  1,  2009,  among  Mercedes-Benz  Auto  Receivables  Trust  2009-1,  as  Issuer,  Daimler  Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and DCFS USA LLC, as Seller and Servicer (the "Servicing Agreement"), for the period from October 9, 2009 to December 31, 2009 (the "Reporting Period") I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: (a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision. (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under  the  Servicing  Agreement  in  all  material  respects  throughout  the  Reporting  Period,  except that:  With respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(xiv), certain delinquencies, charge-offs and uncollectible  accounts  were  not  recognized  and  recorded  in  accordance  with  the transaction agreements. DCFS USA LLC believes that distributions to the security holders were not materially impacted as a result of the material noncompliance noted above. Nevertheless, DCFS USA LLC is exploring procedural and policy changes to achieve full compliance with these requirements. Dated:  March 24, 2010 /s/ Brian T. Stevens Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KAREN SHOCKLEY,

Petitioner

v.

LANH NGUYEN AND THAO VU,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 106 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2019, the “Petition for Review for Application 

to Stay Transmission of Record” is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Gas Company for
the three months ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000022620
<NAME> COMMONWEALTH GAS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          261,875
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>              0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              95,780
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            25,636
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     383,291
<COMMON>                            71,425
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,739
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 30,579
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     129,743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               105,800
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                   9,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>        3,650
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     135,098
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      383,291
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          108,788
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 8,456
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          83,899
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          92,355
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             16,433
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     180
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      16,613
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             2,905
<NET-INCOME>                        13,708
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       13,708
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            2,186
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              32,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03506

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1693 

To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. ARMSTRONG, and Mr. 

BACON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating a Quan5 tifiably Unjust Application of the Law Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘EQUAL Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1693 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR CO2 CAINE OFFENSES WHERE THE COCAINE IN3 VOLVED IS COCAINE BASE. 

4 (a) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.—The following 

5 provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

6 801 et seq.) are repealed: 

7 (1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A) (21 

8 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A)). 

9 (2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B) (21 

10 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(B)). 

11 (b) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IMPORT AND EXPORT

12 ACT.—The following provisions of the Controlled Sub13 stances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.) 

14 are repealed: 

15 (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1) (21 

16 U.S.C. 960(b)(1)). 

17 (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2) (21 

18 U.S.C. 960(b)(2)). 

19 (c) APPLICABILITY TO PENDING AND PAST CASES.— 

20 (1) PENDING CASES.—This section, and the 

21 amendments made by this section, shall apply to any 

22 sentence imposed after the date of enactment of this 

23 Act, regardless of when the offense was committed. 

24 (2) PAST CASES.—In the case of a defendant 

25 who, before the date of enactment of this Act, was 

26 convicted or sentenced for a Federal offense involvVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:07 May 01, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1693.IH H1693

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1693 IH

1 ing cocaine base, the sentencing court may, on mo2 tion of the defendant, the Bureau of Prisons, the at3 torney for the Government, or on its own motion, 

4 impose a reduced sentence after considering the fac5 tors set forth in section 3553(a) of title 18, United 

6 States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Robert Eddie DISMUKES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-460.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1

 

SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs

*PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS*

www.sealebeers.com

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the use, in the statement onForm 10-K of EnzymeBioSystems, of our report dated October 14, 2013 on our audit of the financial statements of EnzymeBioSystemsas of June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the yearsthen ended and from inception on June 26, 2009 through June 30, 2013, and the reference to us under the caption “Experts”.

 

 

***/s/******Sealeand Beers, CPAs***

 

Seale and Beers, CPAs

Las Vegas, Nevada

October 15, 2013

 

 

**Seale and Beers, CPAs PCAOB &CPAB Registered Auditors**

**50 S. Jones Blvd Suite 202 LasVegas, NV 89107 Phone: (888)727-8251 Fax: (888)782-2351**
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q/A





Quarterly Report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





For Period ended March 31, 2010





Commission File Number 0-32201





BIO-MATRIX SCIENTIFIC GROUP, INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





DELAWARE
33-0824714(State of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)8885 Rehco Road, San Diego, California
92121(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)





(619) 398-3517


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)








Check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]   No [   ]





Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) (check one): Yes [   ]   No [X]





There were 69,202,111 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2010.





Pursuant to this Form 10-Q/A, the registrant amends "Item 6. Exhibits” and Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1, and 32.2 for the   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010














Item 6. EXHIBITS





31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer31.2
Certification of Acting Chief Financial Officer32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 dated.32.2
Certification of Acting Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 dated.





















































2


SIGNATURES





In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Company caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Bio- Matrix Scientific Group, Inc.a Delaware corporationBy:
/s/ David R. KoosDavid R. KoosChief Executive OfficerDate: July 12, 2010




























































3