Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 56655 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: San 

Joaquin County Department of Public 

Works has requested a temporary 

change to the operation of the Bacon 

Island Road Drawbridge, mile 8.6, over 

Middle River, between Bacon Island and 

Lower Jones Tract, CA. The drawbridge 

navigation span provides approximately 

8 feet vertical clearance above Mean 

High Water in the closed-to-navigation 

position. In accordance with 33 CFR 

117.171(a), the draw opens on signal 

from May 15 through September 15 

from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. From September 

16 through May 14, the draw opens on 

signal from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. from 

Thursday through Monday. At all other 

times, the draw shall open on signal if 

at least 12 hours notice is given to the 

San Joaquin County Department of 

Public Works at Stockton. Navigation on 

the waterway is commercial and 

recreational. 

The drawspan will be secured in the 

closed-to-navigation position from 9 

a.m. on September 8, 2014 to 5 p.m. on 

October 23, 2014, due to structural 

maintenance work in replacing the 

approach deck slabs. The work will 

require loss of power to the bridge 

electrical systems. This temporary 

deviation has been coordinated with the 

waterway users. No objections to the 

proposed temporary deviation were 

raised. 

Vessels able to pass through the 

bridge in the closed position may do so 

at any time. The bridge will not be able 

to open for emergencies. Old River can 

be used as an alternate route for vessels 

unable to pass through the bridge in the 

closed position. The Coast Guard will 

inform waterway users of this temporary 

deviation via our Local and Broadcast 

Notices to Mariners, to minimize 

resulting navigational impacts. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: September 4, 2014. 

D.H. Sulouff, 

District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard 

District. 

[FR Doc. 2014–22588 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2014–0829] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Willamette River, Portland, OR 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of deviation from 

drawbridge regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a 

temporary deviation from the operating 

schedule that governs the Burlington 

Northern Santa Fe Railway Bridge, also 

known as the St. Johns RR Bridge, 

across the Willamette River, mile 6.9, at 

Portland, OR. The deviation is necessary 

to facilitate installation of new rail 

joints. This deviation allows the bridge 

to remain in the closed position during 

maintenance activities. 

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

7 a.m. on September 23, 2014 to 5 p.m. 

on October 2, 2014, and will be enforced 

from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on September 23, 

2014; from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on 

September 25, 2014; from 7 a.m. to 5 

p.m. on September 30, 2014; and from 

7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on October 2, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this 

deviation, [USCG–2014–0829] is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Type the docket number in the 

‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ 

Click on Open Docket Folder on the line 

associated with this deviation. You may 

also visit the Docket Management 

Facility in Room W12–140 on the 

ground floor of the Department of 

Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this temporary 

deviation, call or email Mr. Steven 

Fischer, Bridge Administrator, Coast 

Guard Thirteenth District; telephone 

206–220–7282, email 

steven.m.fischer3@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing the docket, call 

Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Burlington 

Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway 

requested this deviation to facilitate the 

installation of new rail joints on the 

bridge. The bridge, also known as the St. 

Johns RR Bridge, crosses the Willamette 

River at mile 6.9 and provides 54 feet 

of vertical clearance above Columbia 

River Datum 0.0 while in the closed 

position. Under normal operations, this 

bridge opens on signal as required by 33 

CFR 117.5. The deviation period is from 

7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on September 23, 2014; 

from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on September 25, 

2014; from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on 

September 30, 2014; and from 7 a.m. to 

5 p.m. on October 2, 2014. This 

deviation allows the lift span of the 

BNSF Railway Bridge across the 

Willamette River, mile 6.9, to remain in 

the closed position and need not open 

for maritime traffic during the periods 

listed above The bridge shall operate in 

accordance to 33 CFR § 117.5 at all other 

times. BNSF will entertain requests 

from mariners to change the above listed 

schedule for emergent vessel arrivals or 

departures that are dependent on water 

level, given 72 hours advanced notice. 

The BNSF contact is Ron Berry, who 

can be reached at (913) 551–4164. 

Waterway usage on this stretch of the 

Willamette River includes vessels 

ranging from commercial tug and barge 

to small pleasure craft. 

Vessels able to pass through the 

bridge in the closed positions may do so 

at any time. Barring coordination with 

BNSF, the bridge will not be able to 

open for emergencies, and there is no 

immediate alternate route for vessels to 

pass. The Coast Guard will also inform 

the users of the waterways through our 

Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners 

of the change in operating schedule for 

the bridge so that vessels can arrange 

their transits to minimize any impact 

caused by the temporary deviation. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: September 9, 2014. 

Steven M. Fischer, 

Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard 

District. 

[FR Doc. 2014–22591 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0469; FRL–9912–67– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan; State Stationary 

Source Rules 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

56656 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the 

Arizona State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). These revisions include two State 

statutes and certain State rules that 

govern stationary sources under the 

jurisdiction of the Arizona Department 

of Environmental Quality and that 

establish definitions and other general 

provisions; ambient air quality 

standards and area designations; and 

emissions limitations and other 

requirements for certain types of 

stationary sources. Generally, approval 

of these revisions updates and replaces 

previously approved provisions in the 

Arizona SIP, but the EPA is also 

approving a few rules that are new to 

the Arizona SIP and a few rescissions 

that remove certain other rules from the 

Arizona SIP without replacement. The 

EPA is approving these revisions 

because they meet all applicable 

requirements of the Clean Air Act. 

DATES: This rule is effective on 

November 24, 2014 without further 

notice, unless EPA receives adverse 

comments by October 23, 2014. If we 

receive such comments, we will publish 

a timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register to notify the public that this 

direct final rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2014–0469, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or Deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX, 

(415) 947–4125, vineyard.christine@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What statutes and rules did the State 

submit? 

B. Are there previous versions of the 

statutes and rules in the Arizona SIP? 

C. What is the purpose of the submitted 

statutes and rules? 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the submitted 

provisions? 

B. Do the submitted provisions meet all 

applicable requirements? 

C. Public Comment and Final Action 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What statutes and rules did the State 

submit? 

On July 15, 1998, July 28, 2011, and 

October 29, 2012, the Arizona 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(ADEQ) submitted revisions to the 

Arizona State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). ADEQ supplemented the 1998 

and 2011 submittals on May 16, 2014, 

and supplemented the 2012 submittal 

on September 6, 2013. 

These revisions include certain 

statutes and rules regulating stationary 

sources under ADEQ’s jurisdiction. 

Under section 110(k)(3) of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’), EPA is obligated to 

approve, disapprove, or conditionally 

approve SIPs and SIP revisions. Table 1 

lists the statutes and rules that we are 

approving in today’s action with the 

corresponding effective dates and 

submittal dates. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 56657 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED ARIZONA STATUTES AND RULES APPROVED IN THIS ACTION

Arizona revised statutes (ARS) 

Section No. Title State effective date Submitted 

49–402 ..................................... State and county control .......................................................... Amended through Laws 2002, 

Ch. 110, § 1.

10/29/12 

49–426 (excluding paragraphs 

D, E.1, F, I, J, and M)1.

Permits; duties of director; exceptions; applications; objections; fees.Amended through Laws 1997, 

Ch. 178, § 5.

07/28/11 

Arizona Administrative Code 

(AAC) Rule No. 

Title Effective Date Submitted 

R18–2–101 [excluding definitions (2), (20), (32), (87), 

(109), and (122)] 2.

Definitions ................................................................................. Various .................................... 10/29/12 

R18–2–102 .............................. Incorporated Materials ............................................................. 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–201 .............................. Particulate Matter: PM10 and PM2.5 ......................................... 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–202 .............................. Sulfur Oxides (Sulfur Dioxide) ................................................. 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–203 .............................. Ozone: One-hour Standard and Eight-hour Averaged Standard.08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–204 .............................. Carbon monoxide ..................................................................... 09/26/90 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–205 .............................. Nitrogen Oxides (Nitrogen Dioxide) ......................................... 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–206 .............................. Lead ......................................................................................... 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–210 .............................. Attainment, Nonattainment, and Unclassifiable Area Designations.08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–215 .............................. Ambient air quality monitoring methods and procedures ........ 09/26/90 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–216 .............................. Interpretation of Ambient Air Quality Standards and Evaluation of Air Quality Data.03/07/09 .................................. 10/29/12 

R9–3–218 (rescission) ............ Violations .................................................................................. 08/07/12 (repeal) .................... 07/28/11 

R18–2–601 .............................. General ..................................................................................... 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–604 .............................. Open Areas, Dry Washes, or Riverbeds ................................. 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–605 .............................. Roadways and Streets ............................................................. 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–606 .............................. Material Handling ..................................................................... 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–607 .............................. Storage piles ............................................................................ 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–608 .............................. Mineral Tailings ........................................................................ 03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–614 .............................. Evaluation of nonpoint source emissions ................................ 08/07/12 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–701 .............................. Definitions ................................................................................. 08/07/12 .................................. 10/29/12 

R18–2–703 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Fossil-fuel Fired 

Steam Generators and General Fuel-burning Equipment.

03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–704 .............................. Standards of Performance for Incinerators .............................. 08/04/07 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–706 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Nitric Acid Plants ....... 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–707 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Sulfuric Acid Plants ... 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R9–3–509 (rescission) ............ Standards of Performance for Existing Petroleum Refineries Not yet repealed but no applicable sources.07/15/98 

R18–2–714 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Sewage Treatment 

Plants.

11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–715(F), (G) and (H) ..... Standards of Performance for Existing Primary Copper 

Smelters: Site-Specific Requirements.

03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11 

R9–3–518 (rescission) ............ Standards of Performance for Existing Kraft Pulp Mills .......... 08/04/07 (repeal) .................... 07/28/11 

R18–2–719 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Stationary Rotating 

Machinery.

03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–720 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Lime Manufacturing 

Plants.

03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–723 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Concrete Batch Plants 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–724 .............................. Standards of Performance for Fossil-fuel Fired Industrial and 

Commercial Equipment.

03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–726 .............................. Standards of Performance for Sandblasting Operations ......... 11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–728 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Ammonium Sulfide 

Manufacturing Plants.

11/15/93 .................................. 07/15/98 

R18–2–729 .............................. Standards of Performance for Cotton Gins ............................. 08/04/07 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–730 .............................. Standards of Performance for Unclassified Sources ............... 03/07/09 .................................. 07/28/11 

R18–2–732 .............................. Standards of Performance for Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators.08/04/07 .................................. 07/28/11 

Appendix 2 .............................. Test Methods and Protocols .................................................... 10/03/05 .................................. 07/28/11 

Appendix 10 (rescission) ......... Evaluation of Air Quality Data .................................................. 03/07/09 (repeal) .................... 07/28/11 

Appendix 11 (rescission) ......... Allowable Particulate Emissions Computations ....................... 03/07/09 (repeal) .................... 07/28/11 

Not applicable .......................... Arizona Testing Manual for Air Pollutant Emissions, Revision 

F, March 1992, Section 1.

March 1992 ............................. 07/28/11 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

56658 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

1The EPA will be taking action on ARS section 

49–426(F) in a separate rulemaking action that will 

relate to Arizona’s amended New Source Review 

program. ADEQ does not intend the other 

paragraphs that are listed (i.e., D, E.1, I, J, and M) 

to be part of the Arizona SIP. 2The EPA will be taking action on the following 

six definitions in R18–2–101 in a separate 

rulemaking action that will relate to Arizona’s 

amended New Source Review program: ‘‘actual 

emissions,’’ ‘‘begin actual construction,’’ 

‘‘construction,’’ ‘‘net emissions increase,’’ 

‘‘potential to emit,’’ and ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant.’’ 

B. Are there previous versions of the 

statutes and rules in the Arizona SIP? 

Most of the submitted statutes and 

rules will supersede or replace 

previously-approved versions in the 

Arizona SIP. See table 2 below for the 

statutes or rules that are superseded by 

approval of the statutes and rules 

covered in this action, and the dates on 

which the previous versions were 

approved by EPA. Table 2 also lists the 

existing SIP rules that are being deleted 

from the SIP without replacement along 

with the dates that they were approved 

by EPA. The following rules are new to 

the SIP: R18–2–102 (‘‘Incorporated 

Materials’’), R18–2–210 (‘‘Attainment, 

Nonattainment, and Unclassifiable Area 

Designations’’), and Appendix 2 (‘‘Test 

Methods and Protocols’’). 

TABLE 2—SIP STATUTES AND RULES SUPERSEDED OR DELETED FROM ARIZONA SIP IN THIS ACTION

Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) 

Section No. Title Existing SIP statute that is superseded by this action Previous approval 

49–402 ........................................... State and county control .............. 49–402 .......................................... 65 FR 36353 (June 8, 2000). 

49–426 (excluding paragraphs D, 

E.1, F, I, J, and M).

Permits; duties of director; exceptions; applications; objections; 

fees.

36–1707.01 ................................... 47 FR 26382 (June 18, 1982). 

Arizona Administrative Code (AAC) 

Rule No. Title 

Existing SIP Rule that is superseded (entirely or in part) or deleted by this action 

Previous approval 

R18–2–101 [excluding definitions 

(2), (20), (32), (87), (109), and 

(122)]3.

Definitions ..................................... R9–3–101; R9–3–102; R18–2– 

101.

43 FR 33245 (July 31, 1978); 47 

FR 17483 (April 23, 1982); 47 

FR 42572 (September 28, 

1982); 48 FR 19878 (May 3, 

1983); 69 FR 51952 (August 

24, 2004). 

R18–2–201 .................................... Particulate Matter: PM10 and 

PM2.5.

R3–3–201 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–202 .................................... Sulfur Oxides (Sulfur Dioxide) ...... R3–3–202 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–203 .................................... Ozone: One-hour Standard and 

Eight-hour Averaged Standard.

R3–3–204 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–204 .................................... Carbon monoxide ......................... R9–3–205 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–205 .................................... Nitrogen Oxides (Nitrogen Dioxide).R3–3–206 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–206 .................................... Lead .............................................. R3–3–207 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–215 .................................... Ambient air quality monitoring 

methods and procedures.

R9–3–215 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–216 .................................... Interpretation of Ambient Air Quality Standards and Evaluation of 

Air Quality Data.

R9–3–216 (paragraph A) .............. 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R9–3–218 (rescission) ................... Violations ...................................... R9–3–218 (deleted from SIP) ...... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–601 .................................... General ......................................... R9–3–401 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–604 .................................... Open Areas, Dry Washes, or Riverbeds.R9–3–404 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–605 .................................... Roadways and Streets ................. R9–3–405 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–606 .................................... Material Handling .......................... R9–3–406 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–607 .................................... Storage piles ................................. R9–3–407 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–608 .................................... Mineral Tailings ............................ R9–3–408 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–614 .................................... Evaluation of nonpoint source 

emissions.

R9–3–410 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–701 .................................... Definitions ..................................... R9–3–101; R18–2–101 ................ 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982); 47 

FR 42572 (September 28, 

1982); 48 FR 19878 (May 3, 

1983); 49 FR 41026 (October 

19, 1984); 69 FR 51952 (August 24, 2004). 

R18–2–703 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Fossil-fuel Fired Steam 

Generators and General Fuelburning Equipment.

R9–3–503 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–704 .................................... Standards of Performance for Incinerators.R9–3–504 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–706 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Nitric Acid Plants.R9–3–506 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–707 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Sulfuric Acid Plants.R9–3–507 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 56659 

3The EPA will be taking action on the following 

six definitions in R18–2–101 in a separate 

rulemaking action that will relate to Arizona’s 

amended New Source Review program: ‘‘actual 

emissions,’’ ‘‘begin actual construction,’’ 

‘‘construction,’’ ‘‘net emissions increase,’’ 

‘‘potential to emit,’’ and ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant.’’ 

Arizona Administrative Code (AAC) 

Rule No. Title 

Existing SIP Rule that is superseded (entirely or in part) or deleted by this action 

Previous approval 

R9–3–509 (rescission) ................... Standards of Performance for Existing Petroleum Refineries.R9–3–509 (deleted from SIP) ...... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–714 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Sewage Treatment Plants.R9–3–514 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–715(F), (G), (H) ................. Standards of Performance for Existing Primary Copper Smelters: 

Site-Specific Requirements.

R18–2–715(F), (G), (H) ................ 69 FR 63321 (November 1, 

2004). 

R9–3–518 (rescission) ................... Standards of Performance for Existing Kraft Pulp Mills.R9–3–518 (deleted from SIP) ...... 47 FR 42572 (September 28, 

1982); 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 

1982). 

R18–2–719 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Stationary Rotating Machinery.R9–3–519 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–720 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Lime Manufacturing 

Plants.

R9–3–520 ..................................... 47 FR 42572 (September 28, 

1982); 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 

1982). 

R18–2–723 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Concrete Batch Plants.R9–3–523 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–724 .................................... Standards of Performance for 

Fossil-fuel Fired Industrial and 

Commercial Equipment.

R9–3–524 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–726 .................................... Standards of Performance for 

Sandblasting Operations.

R9–3–526 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–728 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Ammonium Sulfide Manufacturing Plants.R9–3–528 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

R18–2–729 .................................... Standards of Performance for 

Cotton Gins.

R9–3–529 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–730 .................................... Standards of Performance for Unclassified Sources.R9–3–502 ..................................... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984). 

R18–2–732 .................................... Standards of Performance for Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators.R9–3–504 ..................................... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

Appendix 10 (rescission) ............... Evaluation of Air Quality Data ...... Appendix 10 (deleted from SIP) ... 47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

Appendix 11 (rescission) ............... Allowable Particulate Emissions 

Computations.

Appendix 11 (deleted from SIP) ... 49 FR 41026 (October 19, 1984); 

corrected at 69 FR 2509 (January 16, 2004). 

Not applicable ................................ Arizona Testing Manual for Air 

Pollutant Emissions, Revision 

F, March 1992, Section 1.

Arizona Testing Manual for Air 

Pollutant Emissions, Section 1.

47 FR 17483 (April 23, 1982). 

C. What is the purpose of the submitted 

statutes and rules? 

ADEQ submitted the statutes and 

rules to update the Arizona SIP and to 

delete rules that have been repealed or 

are otherwise unnecessary to retain in 

the SIP because the sources to which the 

requirements had applied no longer 

exist. The requirements set forth in the 

submitted statutes and rules include the 

types of requirements that are needed to 

comply with CAA section 110(a). EPA’s 

technical support document (TSD) has 

more information about these statutes 

and rules. 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the submitted 

provisions? 

Generally, SIP requirements must be 

enforceable (see section 110(a) of the 

Act) and must not modify the SIP 

inconsistent with sections 110(l) and 

193. 

B. Do the submitted provisions meet all 

applicable requirements? 

The statutes and rule revisions 

approved herein generally renumber 

and otherwise update statutes and rules 

that we approved previously in the 

Arizona SIP. The updated statutes and 

rules approved herein do not relax any 

existing emissions limits or standards 

and meet all applicable requirements. 

Our approval of them is consistent with 

the relevant policy and guidance 

regarding enforceability and SIP 

relaxations. The TSD has more 

information on our evaluation. 

C. Public Comment and Final Action 

As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of 

the Act, the EPA is approving the 

submitted statutes and rule revisions 

listed in table 1 because we believe they 

meet all relevant CAA requirements. We 

do not think anyone will object to this 

approval, so we are finalizing it without 

proposing it in advance. However, in 

the Proposed Rules section of this 

Federal Register, we are simultaneously 

proposing approval of the same 

submitted revisions. If we receive 

adverse comments by October 23, 2014, 

we will publish a timely withdrawal in 

the Federal Register to notify the public 

that the direct final approval will not 

take effect and we will address the 

comments in a subsequent final action 

based on the proposal. If we do not 

receive timely adverse comments, the 

direct final approval will be effective 

without further notice on November 24, 

2014. This will incorporate these 

statutes and rule revisions into the 

federally enforceable SIP. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

56660 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State statutes and rule 

revisions as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by November 24, 

2014. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the Proposed Rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: May 30, 2014. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Editorial Note: This document was 

received for publication by the Office of 

Federal Register on September 17, 2014. 

Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart D—Arizona 

■ 2. Section 52.120 is amended by: 

■ a. Adding paragraphs (c)(27)(i)(C), 

(c)(43)(i)(C), (c)(45)(i)(D), (c)(50)(i)(C), 

(c)(54)(i)(G), and (c)(56)(i)(C); 

■ b. Revising paragraph (c)(110) 

introductory text; and 

■ c. Adding paragraphs (c)(110)(i)(A)(3), 

(c)(161), and (c)(162) to read as follows: 

§ 52.120 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(27) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) Previously approved on April 23, 

1982, in paragraph (c)(27)(i)(B) of this 

section and now deleted without 

replacement: R9–3–518 (Paragraphs B 

and C) and Appendix 10 (Sections 

A10.1.3.3, A10.1.4 and A10.2.2 to 

A10.3.4). 

* * * * * 

(43) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) Previously approved on April 23, 

1982, in paragraph (c)(43)(i)(B) of this 

section and now deleted without 

replacement: R9–3–518 (Paragraph A.1 

to A.5). 

* * * * * 

(45) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(D) Previously approved on April 23, 

1982, in paragraph (c)(45)(i)(B) of this 

section and now deleted without 

replacement: R9–3–509 and Appendix 

10 (Sections A10.2 and A10.2.1). 

* * * * * 

(50) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) Previously approved on April 23, 

1982, in paragraph (c)(50)(i)(A) of this 

section and now deleted without 

replacement: Appendix 10 (Sections 

A10.1–A10.1.3.2). 

* * * * * 

(54) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(G) Previously approved on 

September 28, 1982, in paragraph 

(c)(54)(i)(C) of this section and now 

deleted without replacement: R9–3–518 

(paragraphs A to A.1 and A.2). 

* * * * * 

(56) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) Previously approved on October 

19, 1984, in paragraph (c)(56)(i)(A) of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 56661 

this section and now deleted without 

replacement: R9–3–218 and Appendix 

11. 

* * * * * 

(110) New and amended regulations 

were submitted on July 15, 1998, and 

supplemented on May 16, 2014, by the 

Governor’s designee. 

(i) * * * 

(A) * * * 

(3) Arizona Administrative Code, title 

18 (‘‘Environmental Quality’’), chapter 2 

(‘‘Department of Environmental 

Quality—Air Pollution Control’’), supp. 

12–2, June 30, 2012: R18–2–601 

(‘‘General’’); R18–2–604 (‘‘Open Areas, 

Dry Washes, or Riverbeds’’); R18–2–605 

(‘‘Roadways and Streets’’); R18–2–606 

(‘‘Material Handling’’); R18–2–607 

(‘‘Storage Piles’’); and R18–2–614 

(‘‘Evaluation of Nonpoint Source 

Emissions’’); R18–2–706 (‘‘Standards of 

Performance for Existing Nitric Acid 

Plants’’); R18–2–707 (‘‘Standards of 

Performance for Existing Sulfuric Acid 

Plants’’); R18–2–714 (‘‘Standards of 

Performance for Existing Sewage 

Treatment Plants’’); R18–2–723 

(‘‘Standards of Performance for Existing 

Concrete Batch Plants’’); R18–2–726 

(‘‘Standards of Performance for 

Sandblasting Operations’’); and R18–2– 

728 (‘‘Standards of Performance for 

Existing Ammonium Sulfide 

Manufacturing Plants’’). 

* * * * * 

(161) The following plan revision was 

submitted on July 28, 2011, and 

supplemented on May 16, 2014, by the 

Governor’s designee. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality. 

(1) West’s Arizona Revised Statutes, 

2012–2013 Compact Edition; title 49 

(‘‘Environment’’), chapter 3 (‘‘Air 

Quality’’), article 2 (‘‘State Air Pollution 

Control’’) section 49–426 (‘‘Permits; 

duties of director; exceptions; 

applications; objections; fees’’), 

excluding paragraphs (D), (E)(1), (F), (I), 

(J), and (M). 

(2) Arizona Administrative Code, title 

18 (‘‘Environmental Quality’’), chapter 2 

(‘‘Department of Environmental 

Quality—Air Pollution Control’’), supp. 

09–1, March 31, 2009: R18–2–608 

(‘‘Mineral Tailings’’); R18–2–703 

(‘‘Standards of Performance for Fossilfuel Fired Steam Generators and General 

Fuel-burning Equipment’’); R18–2–704 

(‘‘Standards of Performance for 

Incinerators’’); R18–2–715 (‘‘Standards 

of Performance for Existing Primary 

Copper Smelters; Site-Specific 

Requirements’’), excluding paragraphs 

(A) through (E); R18–2–720 (‘‘Standards 

of Performance for Existing Lime 

Manufacturing Plants’’); R18–2–724 

(‘‘Standards of Performance for Fossilfuel Fired Industrial and Commercial 

Equipment’’); R18–2–729 (‘‘Standards of 

Performance for Cotton Gins’’); and 

R18–2–730 (‘‘Standards of Performance 

for Unclassified Sources’’). 

(3) Arizona Administrative Code, title 

18 (‘‘Environmental Quality’’), chapter 2 

(‘‘Department of Environmental 

Quality—Air Pollution Control’’), supp. 

09–2, June 30, 2009: R18–2–732 

(‘‘Standards of Performance for Existing 

Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste 

Incinerators’’). 

(4) Arizona Administrative Code, title 

18 (‘‘Environmental Quality’’), chapter 2 

(‘‘Department of Environmental 

Quality—Air Pollution Control’’), supp. 

12–2, June 30, 2012: R18–2–204 

(‘‘Carbon Monoxide’’); R18–2–719 

(‘‘Standards of Performance for Existing 

Stationary Rotating Machinery’’); and 

Appendix 2 (‘‘Test Methods and 

Protocols’’). 

(5) Arizona Testing Manual for Air 

Pollutant Emissions, Revision F, March 

1992, excluding sections 2 through 7. 

(162) The following plan revision was 

submitted on October 29, 2012, and 

supplemented on September 6, 2013, by 

the Governor’s designee. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality 

(1) West’s Arizona Revised Statutes, 

2012–2013 Compact Edition; title 49 

(‘‘Environment’’), chapter 3 (‘‘Air 

Quality’’), section 49–402 (‘‘State and 

county control’’). 

(2) Arizona Administrative Code, title 

18 (‘‘Environmental Quality’’), chapter 2 

(‘‘Department of Environmental 

Quality—Air Pollution Control’’), supp. 

12–2, June 30, 2012: R18–2–101 

(‘‘Definitions’’), excluding definitions 

(2), (20), (32), (87), (109), and (122); 

R18–2–102 (‘‘Incorporated Materials’’); 

R18–2–201 (‘‘Particulate matter: PM10

and PM2.5’’); R18–2–202 (‘‘Sulfur Oxides 

(Sulfur Dioxide)’’); R18–2–203 (‘‘Ozone: 

One-hour Standard and Eight-hour 

Averaged Standard’’) R18–2–205 

(‘‘Nitrogen Oxides (Nitrogen Dioxide)’’); 

R18–2–206 (‘‘Lead’’); R18–2–210 

(‘‘Attainment, Nonattainment, and 

Unclassifiable Area Designations’’); 

R18–2–215 (‘‘Ambient air quality 

monitoring methods and procedures’’); 

R18–2–216 (‘‘Interpretation of Ambient 

Air Quality Standards and Evaluation of 

Air Quality Data’’); and R18–2–701 

(‘‘Definitions’’). 

[FR Doc. 2014–22480 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

48 CFR Parts 3002, 3007, 3009, 3016, 

3034, 3035, and 3052 

[Docket No. DHS–2009–0006] 

RIN 1601–AA49 

Homeland Security Acquisition 

Regulation; Lead System Integrators 

[HSAR Case 2009–003] 

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Procurement 

Officer, DHS 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This final rule implements 

statutory restrictions on contractors 

acting as lead system integrators in the 

acquisition of DHS major systems, if 

they have direct financial interests in 

the development or construction of the 

system. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective September 23, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nancy Harvey, Senior Procurement 

Analyst, at (202) 447–0956 for 

clarification of content. Please cite 

HSAR Case 2009–003. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

II. Discussion of Comments 

III. Discussion of Final Rule 

IV. Regulatory Analyses 

A. Executive Order 12866 Assessment 

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

C. Paperwork Reduction Act 

D. National Environmental Policy Act 

I. Background 

DHS published an interim rule at 75 

FR 41097 on July 15, 2010 to implement 

section 6405 of the U.S. Troop 

Readiness, Veterans’ Care, Katrina 

Recovery, and Iraq Accountability 

Appropriations Act, 2007, Public Law 

110–28, 121 Stat. 112, 176 (2007) 

(codified as 6 U.S.C. 396; hereinafter 

‘‘Section 396’’). Section 396 places 

limits on firms that can serve as lead 

system integrators on DHS acquisitions 

of major systems. Such contractors may 

have no direct financial interest in the 

development or construction of any 

individual system or element of any 

system of systems they would integrate, 

unless one of the exceptions stated in 

the rule has been satisfied. 

This final rule adopts the interim rule 

with minor changes to the authorities to 

conform to Public Law 111–350, the 

recodification of title 41 of the United 

States Code, and to remove references to 

DHS’s internal delegation of authorities 

that do not directly affect the HSAR. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES