alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,457
<INVENTORY>                                     64,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,112
<PP&E>                                         239,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                 127,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 392,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,212
<BONDS>                                        102,367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,770
<COMMON>                                        14,551
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   392,228
<SALES>                                        259,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259,550
<CGS>                                          196,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   585
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,966
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,355
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61343-61344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30096]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Klamath Project Interim Operations Plan, Klamath Project, Oregon 
and California

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a draft environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Bureau of Reclamation 
(Reclamation) proposes to prepare a draft environmental impact 
statement (DEIS) on a plan for operations of the Klamath Project 
(Project) to cover an interim period, pending completion of a water 
rights adjudication, currently underway by the State of Oregon. The 
plan will be developed to define project operations in relation to 
Reclamation's responsibilities and obligations concerning the 
Endangered Species Act, senior water rights, tribal trust resources, 
Project water users' contractual rights, wildlife refuges, and other 
requirements mandated by law and within the authority of the Secretary 
of Interior.

ADDRESSES: Ms. Laura Allen, NEPA Team Leader, Klamath Basin Area 
Office, Bureau of Reclamation, 6600 Washburn Way, Klamath Falls, OR 
97603.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laura Allen at (541) 883-6935.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Drought conditions in the early 1990s 
demonstrated the need for Reclamation to develop an operations plan for 
the Project to assist those affected by Project operations to 
understand how Reclamation will manage the project, consistent with its 
responsibilities and obligations. Since 1995, Reclamation has operated 
the Project according to annual operations plans/advisories. During 
this time, Reclamation has received considerable information which will 
aid in the development of an interim operations plan for the Project.

[[Page 61344]]

When completed, the interim operations plan will supersede the annual 
operations plans/advisories and will guide Project operations until 
completion of the adjudication. At that time, the interim plan will be 
revised as necessary and additional NEPA documentation may be required.

    Dated: November 5, 1997.
John F. Davis,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 97-30096 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-P
## 1999 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

3-24-1999 

# U S A v . M or el li

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 96-5144,96-5389

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1999 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v . M or e l l i " (1999). 1999 D e cisio n s . P ape r 76. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999/76

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 96-5144 & 96-5389 In Re: USA vs. Morelli

The following modifications have been made to t he Court's opinion issued on March 9, 1999 in the above-entitl ed appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opi nion: 1. On page 12, line 11 of the second full para graph of the slip opinion, please add a space after the dash. 2. On page 13, line 2 of the third full paragr aph, delete one of the duplicate "the's".

/s/ P. Dou glas Sisk, Clerk

March 25, 1999
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PERIODIC REPORT**

 

I, Larry W. Sayre, Vice President-Finance and Chief FinancialOfficer of Collins Industries, Inc., certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended April 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

 
| Dated: | June 9, 2003 |                                      |
|--------|--------------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |         |                                      |
|   | By           |                                      |
|   |         | /s/ Larry  W. Sayre                       |
|   |         | Larry W. Sayre, Vice President of Finance |
|   |         | and Chief Financial Officer               |

 

[A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Collins Industries, Inc. and willbe retained by Collins Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
DAVID HENDERSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHRIS ESTRADA, 

U.S. Postal Inspector, 

Defendant. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

FEB 2 a 2009 

NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON CLERK 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT' 

09 U339 

This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiffs application to proceed in 

forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application, and will dismiss the 

complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Plaintiff alleges that defendant Estrada conspired with others to interfere with, delay or 

destroy plaintiff s mail. See Compl. at 1-2. This interference with the mail "is part of a massive 

conspiracy [a]rising from plaintiffs work as an intelligence officer with the U.S. State 

Department ... and service in a military reserve unit." Id. at 2. He demands $100 million plus 

punitive damages. Id. 

The elements of civil conspiracy are "(1) an agreement between two or more persons; (2) 

to participate in an unlawful act, or a lawful act in an unlawful manner; (3) an injury caused by 

an unlawful overt act performed by one of the parties to the agreement; (4) which overt act was 

done pursuant to and in furtherance of the common scheme." Halberstam v. Welch, 705 F.2d 

472,477 (D.C. Cir. 1983). Conclusory allegations of an agreement will not suffice. Brady v. 

Livingood, 360 F. Supp. 2d 94, 104 (D.D.C. 2004) (mere allegation that defendants "agreed 
among themselves" to subject plaintiff to discriminatory acts, without alleging facts suggesting 

that the defendants were acting in concert in furtherance of a shared goal of discriminating 

against him not sufficient) (footnote and citations omitted). Because plaintiff has not alleged 

facts to support his conspiracy claim, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim 

upon which relief can be granted. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued 

separately on this same date. 

['./[u,- cJ }jude 

United States District Judge
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6099

ETHARD SHERWAND WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID HARMON, Superintendent; WALTER REED MEDICAL CENTER, Director; JOHN DOE, Jail Physician, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-877-02) Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ethard Sherwand Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ethard Sherwand Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). Because Williams did not demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court’s dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. Because the dismissal was without prejudice, Williams may, of course, refile his action in the district court if he can demonstrate exhaustion of all available administrative remedies. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### James H. PRICE v. Voyle C. JOHNSON.

No. 39201.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 898.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United  States, Hawaii, Hawaiian Islands
SuDocs Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> [if !vml]>[endif]> C 55.418/7:19004/

Item Number:  [if !vml]>[endif]>0191-B-15 (online)
System Number: 000871771
[if !vml]>[endif]>
19004-4-1978.jpg
2012-05-23 10:50
30M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
19004-4-1978.pdf
2012-05-23 13:37
30M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
19004-5-1982.jpg
2012-05-23 10:51
27M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
19004-5-1982.pdf
2012-05-23 13:40
27M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
19004-6-1980.jpg
2012-05-23 10:51
25M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
19004-6-1980.pdf
2012-05-23 13:39
25M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
19004-11-1975.jpg
2012-05-23 10:50
24M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
19004-11-1975.pdf
2012-05-23 13:36
24M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Thumbs.db
2012-05-23 13:40
26K
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July29, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3048730-NOV-201108:43 AM
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59346-59347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 102897A]


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; 
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements; Public Workshop

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of workshop

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces a workshop to explain provisions of the 1998 
recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the Alaska groundfish 
fisheries, to introduce the proposed electronic reporting system, to 
provide detailed instructions on completion and submittal of the 
required forms and logsheets, and to answer questions on recordkeeping 
and reporting from members of the fishing industry and other interested 
parties.

DATES: Tuesday, December 16, 1997, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Alaska local 
time.

ADDRESSES: The workshop will be held in the Windsor Room at the 
Westmark Hotel located at 720 West Fifth Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska.


[[Page 59347]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patsy A. Bearden, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This workshop is scheduled by NMFS in 
response to requests by the affected fishing industry for a training 
workshop on the groundfish recordkeeping and reporting system.
Dated: October 28, 1997.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-29023 Filed 10-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1824 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to air cargo in Puerto 

Rico, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

air cargo in Puerto Rico, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto Rico Air Cargo 

5 Industry Empowerment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CARGO IN ALASKA OR PUERTO RICO. 

7 Section 41703(e) of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in the subsection heading by inserting ‘‘OR

10 PUERTO RICO’’ after ‘‘ALASKA’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1824 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘or Puerto Rico’’ after ‘‘Alas2 ka’’ each place it appears. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Southwest Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters’
Fringe Benefit Funds
Health Fund: P.O. Box 1257, Troy, MI 48099
Pension Fund: 33 Fitch Blvd., Austintown, OH 44515
Phone: 330-779-8862
Website: www.ochenefits.org

To Be Submitted: March 30, 2017

Electronic Submission to www.treasury.gov/mpra
The Honorable Steven T. Mnuchin

Secretary of the Treasury

Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20220

incil of Carpenters Pension Plan — Application for Suspension of
ension Relief Act of 2014

Re: Southwest Ohio Regional (
Benefits Under the Multiemployer

Dear Secretary Mnuchin:

The Board of Trustees for the Southwest Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Plan as the Plan
Sponsor, respectfully submit this application for approval of a proposed suspension of benefits pursuant
to the Internal Revenue Code §432(e)(9) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1976

§305(e)(9).

The Board of Trustees hereby designates its Secretary, Mr. Richard C, Fletcher, as its Authorized
Representative Trustee for purposes of executing all documents necessary for this application.

Respectfully Submitted By:

Redacted by the U.S. Department of the Treasu

Redacted by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury

ithe Treasury

Ra

Redacted by the U.S. Department of
ithe Treasury

SLK_TOL:#2790159v1
SWORCCPP-000001

YTOO
#### Alice S. PARISH and Mattie L. Parish v. Joseph O. STEVENS and Mildred Cooper Stevens.

No. 45481.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 10, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1969.

*608Prewitt, Bullard, Braddock & Vance, Vicksburg, for appellants.

Clements & Clements, Rolling Fork, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an adoption proceeding. The father and mother of Cynthia Ann Stevens and Joseph Richard Stevens were killed in an automobile accident. Their paternal grandparents sought to adopt these minor children by petition in the Chancery Court of Sharkey County, Mississippi. Their maternal grandmother had been previously appointed their guardian and she objected to the adoption proceedings. The case was tried and many witnesses testified. The chancellor entered an interlocutory decree permitting the paternal grandparents to adopt their grandchildren. The court, however, retained jurisdiction of the adoption proceedings. The paternal grandparents filed a motion at the following term of court requesting the court to enter a decree making the adoption proceedings final. The maternal grandmother filed a motion requesting the chancellor to reconsider his former holding and to reopen the case for further proof. The proposed evidence was shown by attached affidavits to the motion. The chancellor overruled the motion of the maternal grandmother and sustained the motion of the paternal grandparents to make final the adoption of the children to them. The court entered a final decree of adoption of Cynthia Ann Stevens and Joseph Richard Stevens by Joseph O. Stevens, Sr., and Mildred Cooper Stevens. The maternal grandmother has appealed to this Court. She feels that neither of the grandparents should be permitted to adopt the children.

We have examined this record carefully and we have reached the conclusion that the issue as to whether or not the paternal grandparents are suitable persons to rear their grandchildren and whether or not it is for the best interest of the minors are largely questions of fact for the determination of the chancellor. We cannot hold from the facts shown in the record that the chancellor was manifestly wrong. We find no reversible error in the record in this case and for that reason we affirm the judgment of the chancery court.

Affirmed.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., and RODGERS, BRADY, PATTERSON and SMITH, JJ„ concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 61331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-30102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 97-21]


Pyramids International, Inc. v. Stuart Roland and Container X-
Press, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment

    Notice is given that a complaint filed by Pyramids International, 
Inc., (``Complainant'') against Stuart Roland and Container X-Press, 
Inc. (``Respondents'') was served November 10, 1997. Complainant 
alleges that Respondents have violated sections 8(a), 10(d)(1), and 
23(a) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. app. Sections 1707(a), 
1709(d)(1), and 1721(a), by contracting to provide ocean transport for 
a shipment from New Orleans, Louisiana to Kotka, Finland and issuing a 
bill of lading without a proper tariff on file with the Federal 
Maritime Commission and subsequent to cancellation of Respondents' 
bond; booking the shipment with a third party entity without informing 
Complainant; accepting Complainant's check, while failing to pay the 
third party entity, thus delaying delivery and causing the third party 
to refuse to release Complainant's cargo until Complainant paid it 
ocean freight and one month's demurrage.
    This proceeding has been assigned to the office of Administrative 
Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence 
within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after 
consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer 
to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing 
shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of 
the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine 
issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn 
statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the 
nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-
examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record. 
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of 
the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by November 
10, 1998, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by 
March 10, 1999.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-30102 Filed 11-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSE D. BOND,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 74 EM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2022, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Request for Writ of Mandamus” is DENIED.
No. 9351.

#### W. J. O'Dell & Co. *v.*Rumbach et al.

(Decided October 23, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Belmont County.

*Messrs. Shay & Cogan; Mr. A. W. Kennon*and *Mr. N. K. Kennon.*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Tallman & Armstrong,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.