alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022767
<NAME> TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER CO
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      921,200
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        214
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          15,231
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        29,716
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 966,361
<COMMON>                                           107
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      222,146
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             60,049
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 282,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,240
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           374,400
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  130,100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 176,319
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  966,361
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      124,575
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,804
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     102,995
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     105,799
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         18,776
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 102
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  18,878
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        13,559
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,319
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         38
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    5,281
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        10,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       12,498
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (5,445)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Seyed D. Tahaei (a.k.a., David Tahaei), Petitioner, 

v. 

Sherri L. Tahaei (f.k.a., Sherri L. Smith), Respondent. 

Appellate Case No. 2012-213623 

Lower Court Case No. 2005-DR-15-0316 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal From Colleton County 

The Honorable Frances P. Segars-Andrews, Family 

Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2014-MO-021 

Submitted June 24, 2014 – Filed July 2, 2014 

REVERSED 

Thomas James Rode, of Thurmond Kirchner Timbes & 

Yelverton, PA, of Charleston, for Petitioner. 

Sherri L. Tahaei, Pro Se Respondent, of Summerville. 
PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the Court of 

Appeals' decision in Tahaei v. Tahaei, 2012-UP-078 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Aug. 1, 

2012). We grant the petition, dispense with further briefing, and reverse the Court 

of Appeals' decision. 

The Court of Appeals erred in reviewing the trial court's decision de novo. An 

action to determine the existence of a common law marriage is an action at law, 

but the question of whether a common law marriage exists is one of fact. 

Campbell v. Christian, 235 S.C. 102, 104, 110 S.E.2d 1, 2 (1959). In an action at 

law, on appeal from a case tried without a jury, the findings of fact of the trial court 

will not be disturbed on appeal unless found to be without evidence which 

reasonably supports the trial court's findings. Townes Assoc., Ltd. v. City of 

Greenville, 266 S.C. 81, 86, 221 S.E.2d 773, 775 (1976). Under the proper "any 

evidence" standard of review, we find the record contains sufficient evidence to 

uphold the trial court's findings of fact, including the existence of a common-law 

marriage. The Court of Appeals erred by supporting its finding of the existence of 

a common law marriage with its own findings of fact from the record. 

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is hereby 

REVERSED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00369-CR

Jimmy ALDANA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR8138

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED December 5, 2018.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE





Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:





Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”)





Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).





Period:  Twelve months ended December 31, 2009 (the “Period”).





With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:




·
The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




·
The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




·
Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.








CITIBANK, N.A.
  By: /s/ Karen Montback
 Its:  Managing Director


Dated: February 26, 2010
#### Frank Armstrong BEAR, Appellant, v. Catherine Rowe BEAR, Appellee.

No. 70-679.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of Cosmos Holdings Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                      | **Cosmos Holdings Inc.** |                                                                                                             |
|----------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                     |                                                                                                             |  |
| Date: April 16, 2019 | By:                      | */s/ Grigorios Siokas*                                                                                 |  |
|                      |                          | Grigorios Siokas                                                                                            |  |
|                      |                          | Principal Executive Officer, 

Acting Principal Financial Officer 

and Acting Principal Accounting Officer |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cosmos Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Cosmos Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10.1

Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements, between Visteon
Corporation ("Visteon") and each of the persons named below, to the Revised
Change in Control Agreement constituting Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Visteon for the period ended December 31, 2002.



                                      Name
                                      ----
                                  Peter J. Pestillo

                                  Michael F. Johnston

                                  Daniel R. Coulson

                                  James C. Orchard

                                  Stacy L. Fox

                                  Robert H. Marcin
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial
  Commercial Corp. (the "Company") for the three months and nine months ended
  September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
  date hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of
  the Company, certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant
  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



  By: /S/ JAMES W. STEWART
     ---------------------------
  Name:  JAMES W. STEWART
         Chief Financial Officer


  February 19, 2004







<PAGE>
Exhibit 21.1

Colony Financial, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries



|                                   |  |                              
|---------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                               |  | State orJurisdiction ofEntity
|CFI DB Holding, LLC                |  | Delaware                     
|CFI MBS Investor, LLC              |  | Delaware                     
|CFI RE Holdco, LLC                 |  | Delaware                     
|ColFin DB Funding, LLC             |  | Delaware                     
|ColFin DB Guarantor, LLC           |  | Delaware                     
|ColFin J-11 Funding, LLC           |  | Delaware                     
|ColFin NW Funding, LLC             |  | Delaware                     
|ColFin WLH Funding, LLC            |  | Delaware                     
|ColFin WLH Land Acquisitions, LLC  |  | Delaware                     
|ColFin 666 Funding, LLC            |  | Delaware                     
|Colony CDCF-VIII-CFI Investor, LLC |  | Delaware                     
|Colony Financial Holdco, LLC       |  | Delaware                     
|Colony Financial TRS, LLC          |  | Delaware                     
|Matrix CDCF-CFI Advisors VI, LLC   |  | Delaware                     
|CFI MBS Holding, LLC               |  | Delaware
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-428 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

Aruba 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the NETHERLANDS 

Amending the Agreement of 

September 18, 1997 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington July 27 and November 27, 2007 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 NETHERLANDS 

 Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Aruba 

 Agreement amending the agreement 

 of September 18, 1997. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 July 27 and November 27, 2007; 

 Entered into force April 28, 2008.
**SCHEDULE
      TO EXHIBIT 10.23.2**














**AMENDMENTS
      TO WGI RETENTION AGREEMENTS**


**WITH
      NAMED EXECUTIVES**














**EACH
      DATED AS OF AUGUST 20, 2002**





Stephen
      M. Johnson


George
      H.
      Juetten


Thomas
      H.
      Zarges








NOTE:
      The
      Amendment to Mr. Johnson’s Retention Agreement is identical in all materials
      terms to those entered into with Messrs Juetten and Zarges, with the exception
      that his Retention Bonus is prorated to allow for the time during early 2001
      when he was not in the Company’s employ. Mr. Johnson returned to the employ of
      the Company on November 12, 2001.
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 319

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JOSE MACIAS , Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 214 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.



## O R D E R

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant ’ s motion to supplement the appellate

record with original exhibits admitted at trial, State’s Exhibits 16, 23, 24, 25, and 26, and

Defense Exhibit 12 in Cause No. 12

- CR

- 3963

- F

. The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant ’ s motion to supplement

the appellate record with original exhibits, is of the opinion that the motion should be2

granted. Appellant ’ s motion is hereby GRANTED. The clerk of the trial court is hereby

ORDERED to forward to this Court within fifteen days from the date of this order the

original exhibits admitted at trial in Cause No. 12

- CR

- 3963

- F , State’s Exhibits 16, 23, 24,

25, and 26, a nd Defense Exhibit 12, all of which are CDs containing images, v ide os and

the recording of the 911 call

.
PER CURIAM

Do not publish. Tex R. App. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 2 1 st day of August , 20 14

.
#### James Earl MASON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 45524.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 2, 1970.

Noble & Noble, Brookhaven, for appellant.

*483A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Guy N. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Wade H. Creekmore, Jr. and James H. Creekmore, Special Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### M. M. ROBERTS v. George E. MINTER, Mrs. Barbara Maxwell Minter, O. E. Hart, Sr., d/b/a O. E. Hart Realty Co.

No. 45400.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 22, 1969.

S. Wayne Easterling, Jack B. Weldy, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Sullivan & Sullivan, Hattiesburg, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
PO Box 51 

02/18/2016 

Tom Woodward 

Sky Aviation Corporation 

1444 Airport Rd 

Worland Wy, 82401 

Worland WY 82401 

United States of America Department Of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

To Whom It May Concern; 

(307}347-6138 Fax {307)347-6130 

On August 11, 2015, Sky Aviation was granted Exemption No. 12449. This exemption allows for training 

activities with our Restricted Category CH-46E helicopter with the tail number 461WY. Since that time, 

we have added another helicopter to our Type Certificate R0013DE. We would like to request a 

modification to our Exemption to add tail number 462WY which is on the Type Certificate. We do not 

wish any other changes to the exemption. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Tom Woodward 

President, Sky Aviation
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 

18, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00469-CV

IN RE Z.Q., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 86707

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Wednesday, July 5, 2023, relator Z.Q. filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Leah 

Shapiro, presiding judge of the 315th District Court of Harris County (1) to rule on 

a “motion for a merits ruling on an application for writ of habeas corpus”; and (2) 
2

to rule on a motion for a hearing “in order to fully develop the facts and arguments 

necessary to make a ruling on the constitutional claims.”

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson.
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Martin A. Roenigk, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CompuDyne Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I,  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's   auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  registrant's  board  of
directors;

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls over financial reporting.

         Date: July 30, 2004

                                           /s/ MARTIN ROENIGK
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Martin Roenigk
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                       33
##### 



Exhibit 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, of
El Paso CGP Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, D. Mark Leland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/
D. Mark LelandD. Mark LelandExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 15, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.