alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### R. W. COGLEY et ux. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 8270.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

March 15, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1971.

Writ Refused May 24, 1971.

Gordon White, Baton Rouge, for appellants.

James E. Moore, of Franklin, Moore, Beychok & Cooper, Baton Rouge, for ap-pellee.

Before LANDRY, SARTAIN, and ELLIS, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge:

This is a suit by R. W. Cogley and Lucille Cogley, his wife, for damages arising out of a fall suffered by Mrs. Cogley while riding a bicycle. Defendant is Allstate Insurance Company, the liability insurer of Lamar Russell Blount, on whose property the accident happened. Plaintiffs claim that the fall was due to a hazardous condition negligently allowed to exist by the Blounts in their yard. Allstate denies the negligence of its insured, and alternatively alleges the contributory negligence of Mrs. Cogley. From an adverse judgment, plaintiffs have appealed.

Mrs. Cogley was visiting in the Blount home one evening. As she was leaving, she asked and was granted permission to ride a bicycle which was on the front porch. After she had ridden twelve or thirteen feet, she hit a large irregularly shaped piece of concrete and fell, breaking *380her ankle. At the time of the accident, it was dark, but the front porch light was on, and Mrs. Cogley testified that she felt there was enough light for her to see what she was doing.

The piece of concrete had been placed in the yard by Mr. Blount some four years before the accident, and served as a stepping stone. Mrs. Cogley had visited the Blount home on a number of occasions during that period.

Plaintiffs contend that Mrs. Cogley enjoyed the status of an invitee, and that the Blounts therefore owed her the duty of warning her of the .existence of a dangerous condition on the premises. It is argued that the concrete stepping stone constituted such a condition.

We agree that Mrs. Cogley was an invitee, since she was on a combined business and social visit with the Blounts, who were long time friends. It is settled law that an owner or occupier of property owes a duty of reasonable care to an invitee, and has a duty to warn of the existence of hazardous conditions of which they know or should know. Alexander v. General Accident Fire & Life Assur. Corp., 98 So.2d 730 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1957).

We do not think that plaintiffs have established a breach of the duty owed by the Blounts to Mrs. Cogley. The presence of a stepping stone in one’s yard cannot be said to constitute a hazardous condition per se. Both the testimony and the photographs reveal it to be readily observable, and in close juxtaposition to the concrete walk leading up to the house.

In addition, Mrs. Cogley’s familiarity with the premises, her admission that there was enough light to see by, and the ready observability of the stepping stone are sufficient to render her contributorily negligent in failing to see and avoid it.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, at plaintiffs’ cost.

Affirmed.
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ William Pagano      |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                    |   |   |
|   |                    |   |   |
| Name:  | William Pagano          |   |   |
|   |                    |   |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|   | Date: May 13, 2009      |   |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29809]



[[Page 60897]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-146-006]


U-T Offshore System; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on November 3, 1997, U-T Offshore System (U-TOS), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective November 1, 
1997:

Sub Seventh Revised Sheet No. 73
Sub Second Revised Sheet No. 73A
Sub First Revised Sheet No. 73B

    U-TOS asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's October 24, 1997, letter order in the captioned proceeding 
regarding Order No. 587-C. The above mentioned letter order indicated 
that a number of the standards did not reflect the correct version 
number set forth in Section 284.10(b) of the regulations, with the 
exception of the Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference 
Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29809 Filed 11-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

1975, The Times Atlas of the World, Comprehensive Edition:
New York, Quadrangle, plate 40, scale 1:5,000,000.

Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources, 1977,
Geographic map of the Circum-Pacific Region, Northwest Quadrant:
Tulsa, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, scale
1:10,000,000.

42°-Nn

40°N

38°N | |

OPEN FILE REPORT 79-875

36°N
34°N
IS4ee
; 6
°
62°F ° ON ° Albers equal-area conic projection based
164°E I66°E 172°E on standard parallels 453°N and 295°N
I68°E \70°E
Contour interval 1000 meters (with 200 and 500 meter contours added)
Offshore sounding data not velocity corrected
Scale |: 2,500,000 Ticks show direction of slope
EQUAL-AREA BASE MAP OF THE
50 ie} 50 ifele) 150 200 250 Kilometers
a : . = U. S. Geological Survey
50 1°) 50 100 150 200 250 Statute Miles Open File Report
ao : - NORTHWE
50 ie} 50 100 150 200 250 Nautical Miles
f I — =| t = i= 7

This map is preliminary and has
not been edited or reviewed for

ALBERS EQUAL- AREA PROJECTION standards and nomenclature.
COMPILED BY MARYBETH GERIN AND ANDREW J. STEVENSON
l979
# Transactions Report - CPP

Page &P of &N

# CPP Footnotes

Page &P of &N

# CPP - Citi

Page &P of &N

# CDCI

Page &P of &N

# AIFP.ASSP

Page &P of &N

# TIP.AGP

Page &P of &N

# AIG

Page &P of &N

# CBLI

Page &P of &N

# SBA

Page &P of &N

# PPIP

Page &P of &N

# HAMP

Page &P of &N

# HAMP Incentive PMTs

Page &P of &N

# HHF

Page &P of &N

# FHA Short Refi

Page &P of &N
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT A ugus t 29, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]
I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 17161 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D
. C
. D o c k e tN o . 0 0
- 1 4 0 9 2
- C V
- K MM E R I C V . M A C K L I N , P la in tif f
- A p p e lle e , v ersu s E R I C K M U E C K , a .k .a . H o w a r d E ly , I N T E RN A T I O N A L L I B R A R Y O F P O E T R Y , N A T I O N A L L I B R A R Y O F P O E T R Y , A L E X H A N L E Y , P O E T R Y .C O M , D e f e n d a n ts - A p p e lla n ts .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe r n D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A u gu s t 29, 2006)2

B efo re A N D E R S O N , B IR C H an d W IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: T he defendant s, E ri ck M ueck, Int ernat i on al L i brary of P oetry , N at i on al L i brary of P oetry , A l ex H anl ey , and “ P oetry . com ” ( col l ec t i vel y, “ the defendant s” ), appeal a def

aul tj ud gm entfor $30 0, 00 0 i n st atut ory dam ages re nd er ed agai nstthem for i nfri ng i ng E ri c M ac kl i n’ s c op yr i gh tof tw o p oem s. T he defendant s c l ai m that the di stri ctcourterre d o r abu se d i t s di sc re t i on (1) by f i nd i ng thati thad subj ec t
m a t t e rj ur i s di c t i on, ( 2) by f i ndi ng tha tthe de f

e nda nt s w i l l f

ul l y i nf r i nge d tw o of M ac kl i n’ s w orks, (3) by denyi ng thei r post -ver di ctre qu es tfor a j ury tri al or an evi dent i ary hea ri ng t o d et er m i ne dam ages ; and (4) by fi nd i ng thatthey w er e prop er l y s er ved w i th fi l i ng s a nd m ot i on s. A ft ertho roug hl y c on si deri ng the bri ef s and t he re cord, w e f

i nd no re vers i bl e e rr or. AF F I RME D.
U.S . Department of T ransportation Federal Aviation Administration

Mr. Jeremy Taylor Regulatory Administration 747/767 Program Manager The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 .MC 03-56 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Dear Mr. Taylor: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S .W . Renton , Washington 98057-3356

We have received your petition letter no. RA-15-0 1262, dated March 24, 2015, on behalfof The Boeing Company, requesting an extension oflimitation for Exemption No. 11070. That exemption provides relieffrom the requirements of§ 25.939(a), at Amendment 25-40, and § 25.1305(c)(5), at Amendment 25-120, ofTitle 14, Code of Federal Regulations. This extension ofexemption, if granted , would permit extended time-limited relieffrom the regulations to allow time for Boeing to upgrade ice-crystal icing indicator software on Boeing Model 747-8 and -8F airplanes equipped with GEnx-2B engines. This request, which you submitted to the Department ofTransportation ' s Federal Docket Management System (FDMS), has been added to docket no. FAA-2014-0299. We are in the process ofreviewing your request and will contact you ifwe need additional information. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process , please contact Mike Dostert at 425-227-2132, or e-mail mike.dostert@ faa.gov. Sincerely,

Mark Forseth Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Jacob Elhadad   the Chief Executive Officer,  and Director of Medisafe 1 Technologies Corp  , certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A #2 of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K/A #2 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: June 13, 2011
Medisafe 1 Technologies CorpBy:
/s/ Jacob ElhadadName:  Jacob Elhadad

Title:    Chief Executive Officer, and Director




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Sharp Performance, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert J. Sharp, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  October 4, 2012     SHARP PERFORMANCE, INC.   By: /s/ Robert J. Sharp  Robert J. Sharp Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CDSI'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000022989
<NAME> COMPUTER DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         255,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,695,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,809,100
<PP&E>                                      30,936,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 781,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,226,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,056,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       574,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,536,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                88,226,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            59,873,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,154,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,690,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,439,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,251,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,251,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
Order filed November 16, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00710

- CV

____________ MATTHEW D. WIGGINS, JR. AND D.L. HAMMAKE R , Appellant

V.
AMELIA V. KELLY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11

- CV

- 0325



### ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter for the 122nd District Court informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s r ecord. On October 22, 2012, the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter = s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the rec ord. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply.Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal on or before

December 17 , 2012. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-43 |
|------------------------------------|--------|

 

DWS Investment Trust

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 09/30 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 09/30/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

----
#### Linda S. McWHORTER, Appellant, v. Marc S. McWHORTER, Appellee.

No. 77-432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 18, 1978.

Donald G. Procter, Jr., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

James A. Week of Week & Stone, P. A., Pompano Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We find inadequate support in the record for the modification of the child support provisions of the Final Judgment of Dissolution. Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to reinstate the child support provisions of the Final Judgment.

REVERSED AND REMANDED with directions.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-513 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Meat Products 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 

Signed May 13, 2009 

with 

Annex 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 

 Trade: Meat Products 

Memorandum of understanding signed 

 May 13, 2009; 

 Entered into force May 13, 2009. 

 With annex.
* Judge Hamilton did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1287
KERRY C. CHIDEBE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA96-3169-CCB) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 21, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, * Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kerry C. Chidebe, Appellant Pro Se. Emmett Francis McGee, Jr., Theresa M. Connolly, PIPER & MARBURY, Baltimore, Maryland; Harvey D. Rumeld, MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in her civil action alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601-2654 (West Supp. 1998), and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chidebe v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., No. CA-96-3169-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1606

JOHN C. JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-98-593)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 5, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ann Katherine Sullivan, Sheryl-Lynn C. Makela, CRENSHAW, WARE &

MARTIN, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Patricia K.

Epps, Michael P. Oates, Randolph Sullivan, HUNTON & WILLIAMS,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John C. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying

relief in his civil action against his employer. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Jones v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., No. CA-98-593 (E.D. Va.

Feb. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### AMERICAN SIGHTSEEING TOURS, INC., Appellant, v. FLORIDA LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC., Appellee.

No. 73-59.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Fredrich Pfeiffer, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7991

SAMUEL WHITEHEAD, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-01193-CMH-TCB)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 23, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. Alice T. Armstrong, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Whitehead seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Whitehead has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED