Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules 12995 

functional test (pogo check) on each of the 

six elevator PCA input rod assemblies, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767– 

27–0200, dated June 25, 2007 (for Model 

767–200, –300, and –300F series airplanes); 

or 767–27–0201, dated June 27, 2007 (for 

Model 767–400ER series airplanes). Repeat 

the pogo check thereafter at intervals not to 

exceed 12,000 flight hours. 

(i) Before the accumulation of 12,000 total 

flight hours. 

(ii) Within 12,000 flight hours after 

completion of the most recent pogo check. 

(iii) Within 6,000 flight hours after the 

effective date of this AD. 

(3) If any elevator PCA input rod assembly 

fails to meet any functional test requirement 

of this AD, before further flight, replace the 

elevator PCA input rod assembly with a new 

or serviceable assembly, or overhaul the 

elevator PCA input rod assembly, in 

accordance with the applicable service 

information identified in paragraphs (k)(3)(i) 

and (k)(3)(ii) of this AD, except as provided 

by paragraph (n) of this AD. 

(i) For replacing or overhauling the 

assembly on Model 767–200, –300, and 

–300F airplanes: Use Boeing Service Bulletin 

767–27–0186, dated June 25, 2007; or 767– 

27–0200, dated June 25, 2007; as applicable. 

(ii) For replacing or overhauling the 

assembly on Model 767–400ER airplanes: 

Use Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0187, 

dated June 25, 2007; or 767–27–0201, dated 

June 27, 2007; as applicable. 

(l) New Elevator PCA Check (Mis-Rig Check) 

(1) For airplanes having line numbers 1 

through 901 inclusive: Before further flight 

after doing the actions required by 

paragraphs (j) and (k) of this AD, do a check 

of the elevator PCA rigging, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0186, dated 

June 25, 2007 (for Model 767–200, –300, and 

–300F series airplanes); or 767–27–0187, 

dated June 25, 2007 (for Model 767–400ER 

series airplanes). 

(2) For all airplanes: At the latest of the 

times specified in paragraphs (l)(2)(i), 

(l)(2)(ii), and (l)(2)(iii) of this AD, do a check 

of the elevator PCA rigging, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0202, 

Revision 1, dated February 21, 2008 (for 

Model 767–200, –300, and –300F series 

airplanes); or 767–27–0203, Revision 1, dated 

February 21, 2008 (for Model 767–400ER 

series airplanes). Repeat the mis-rig check 

thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000 

flight hours. 

(i) Before the accumulation 6,000 total 

flight hours. 

(ii) Within 6,000 flight hours after the 

completion of the most recent mis-rig check, 

or after completion of the most recent 

bellcrank repetitive check, as specified in 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–27A0168. 

(iii) Within 6,000 flight hours after the 

effective date of this AD. 

(3) If a mis-rig condition is found, before 

further flight, adjust the PCA input rod 

assemblies and do a structural inspection for 

damage, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Service Bulletin 767–27–0202, Revision 1, 

dated February 21, 2008 (for Model 767–200, 

–300, and –300F airplanes); or 767–27–0203, 

Revision 1, dated February 21, 2008 (for 

Model 767–400ER airplanes). If any damage 

is found during any structural inspection, 

before further flight, repair in accordance 

with a method approved by the Manager, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 

FAA. For a repair method to be approved, the 

repair must meet the certification basis of the 

airplane, and the approval must specifically 

refer to this AD. 

(m) Terminating Action 

Accomplishment of the requirements of 

paragraphs (j), (k), and (l) of this AD 

terminates the requirements of paragraphs 

(g), (h), and (i) of this AD. 

(n) Service Bulletin Exception 

Where Boeing Service Bulletins 767–27– 

0186 and 767–27–0187, both dated June 25, 

2007, specify the use of grease BMS 3–24, 

this AD allows the alternate use of grease 

BMS 3–33. 

(o) Method of Compliance for Paragraph (k) 

of AD 2007–24–08, Amendment 39–15274 

(72 FR 67236, November 28, 2007) 

For airplanes identified in paragraphs 

(o)(1) and (o)(2) of this AD: Doing the actions 

required by paragraphs (j), (k), and (l) of this 

AD is acceptable for compliance with the 

actions required by paragraph (k) of AD 

2007–24–08, Amendment 39–15274 (72 FR 

67236, November 28, 2007). 

(1) Group 1, Configuration 2, airplanes 

identified in Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 767–27–0197, Revision 1, 

dated July 19, 2007. 

(2) Group 1, Configuration 1, airplanes 

identified in Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 767–27–0198, Revision 1, 

dated July 19, 2007. 

(p) Parts Installation Prohibition 

As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install a bellcrank assembly, 

P/N 252T2118–1, 252T2118–2, or 252T2118– 

3, on any airplane. 

(q) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions required by paragraph (l) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of this AD using Boeing Service 

Bulletin 767–27–0202 (for Model 767–200, 

–300, and –300F airplanes) or 767–27–0203, 

(for Model 767–400ER airplanes), both dated 

June 25, 2007. 

(r) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in the 

Related Information section of this AD. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) AMOCs approved previously in 

accordance with AD 2001–04–09, 

Amendment 39–12128 (66 FR 13227, March 

5, 2001), are approved as AMOCs for the 

corresponding requirements of this AD. 

(s) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, 

FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057– 

3356; phone: 425–917–6418; fax: (425) 917– 

6590; email: marie.hogestad@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 

13, 2013. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–04338 Filed 2–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0093; Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–109–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream 

Aerospace LP (Type Certificate 

Previously Held by Israel Aircraft 

Industries, Ltd.) Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an 

existing airworthiness directive (AD) 

that applies to all Gulfstream Aerospace 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
12996 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

LP (Type Certificate Previously Held by 

Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model 

Gulfstream 100 airplanes, and Model 

Astra SPX and 1125 Westwind Astra 

airplanes. The existing AD currently 

requires amending the airplane flight 

manuals (AFMs) to include additional 

procedures for verifying complete 

closure and locking of the main entry 

door (MED). The existing AD also 

currently requires modifying the 

warning and caution lights panel 

(WACLP), changing the WACLP and 

MED wiring, changing the wiring 

harness connecting the MED to the 

WACLP, and revising the log of 

modification of the AFM if necessary. 

Since we issued that AD, we have 

determined that the compliance time 

must be revised to ensure the unsafe 

condition is addressed on low 

utilization airplanes. We have also 

removed one airplane from the 

applicability. We are proposing this AD 

to prevent incomplete closure of the 

MED, which may result in the door 

opening in flight and possible 

separation of the door, causing damage 

to the airplane structure and left engine 

by flying debris and objects. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by April 12, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Gulfstream 

Aerospace Corporation, P.O. Box 2206, 

Mail Station D–25, Savannah, Georgia 

31402–2206; telephone 800–810–4853; 

fax 912–965–3520; email 

pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet http:// 

www.gulfstream.com/product_support/ 

technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–227–1622; fax: 

425–227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0093; Directorate Identifier 

2011–NM–109–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On May 7, 2010, we issued AD 2010– 

11–02, Amendment 39–16307 (75 FR 

28485, May 21, 2010), which 

superseded AD 2007–03–05, 

Amendment 39–14916 (72 FR 4414, 

January 31, 2007). That AD required 

actions intended to address an unsafe 

condition on the products listed above. 

Since we issued AD 2010–11–02, 

Amendment 39–16307 (75 FR 28485, 

May 21, 2010), we have determined that 

the compliance time must be revised to 

ensure the unsafe condition is 

addressed on low utilization airplanes. 

We have also removed one airplane 

from the applicability. The Civil 

Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI), 

which is the aviation authority for 

Israel, has issued Israeli Airworthiness 

Directive 31–06–11–05R1, dated May 

18, 2011 (referred to after this as ‘‘the 

MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition 

for the specified products. The MCAI 

states: 

To increase pilots’ awareness to the 

possibility of incomplete closure of the Main 

Entry Door (MED) by the following means: 

1. Splitting the common caution light 

CABIN DOOR signaling both MED Improper 

Closure and MED Inflatable Seal Failure into 

two separate lights: CABIN DOOR and 

CABIN DOOR SEAL. 

2. Converting the separated CABIN DOOR 

Caution light into a Warning light by 

changing its color to red. 

Note: Airplane Flight Manuals (AFM’S) refer 

to these changes as MOD G1–20052. 

Incomplete closure of the MED may be 

followed by in-flight opening and possible 

separation of the door. As a result, the MED, 

the adjacent fuselage structure and other 

parts of the aircraft may be damaged due to 

opening forces and landing impact. 

Damage to the aircraft structure and to the 

left engine by flying debris and objects may 

also occur. 

* * * * * 

This proposed AD retains the actions 

required by AD 2010–11–02. This 

proposed AD limits the existing 

compliance time by specifying ‘‘no later 

than 6 months after the effective date of 

this AD.’’ This proposed AD also 

removes the airplane having serial 

number (S/N) 158 from the applicability 

because the modification was done in 

production. You may obtain further 

information by examining the MCAI in 

the AD docket. 

Relevant Service Information 

Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type 

Certificate Previously Held by Israel 

Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) has issued 

Service Bulletin 100–31–284, Revision 

1, dated May 27, 2011. The actions 

described in this service information are 

intended to correct the unsafe condition 

identified in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Costs of Compliance 

The new requirements of this AD add 

no additional economic burden. The 

current costs for this AD are repeated for 

the convenience of affected operators, as 

follows: 

Based on the service information, we 

estimate that this proposed AD would 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules 12997 

affect about 160 products of U.S. 

registry. 

The actions that are required by AD 

2010–11–02, Amendment 39–16307 (75 

FR 28485, May 21, 2010) and retained 

in this proposed AD take about 60 workhours per product, at an average labor 

rate of $85 per work hour. Required 

parts cost about $600 per product. Based 

on these figures, the estimated cost of 

the currently required actions is $5,700 

per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing airworthiness directive (AD) 

2010–11–02, Amendment 39–16307 (75 

FR 28485, May 21, 2010), and adding 

the following new AD: 

Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate 

Previously Held by Israel Aircraft 

Industries, Ltd.): Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0093; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM– 

109–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by April 12, 

2013. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD supersedes AD 2010–11–02, 

Amendment 39–16307 (75 FR 28485, May 21, 

2010). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Gulfstream Aerospace 

LP (Type Certificate previously held by Israel 

Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model Gulfstream 

100 airplanes, and Model Astra SPX and 

1125 Westwind Astra airplanes; certificated 

in any category; all serial numbers except 

serial number 158. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 31: Indicating/Recording 

Systems. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by a report of a 

main entry door (MED) opening in flight on 

an unmodified airplane. We are issuing this 

AD to prevent incomplete closure of the main 

entry door, which may result in the door 

opening in flight and possible separation of 

the door, causing damage to the airplane 

structure and left engine by flying debris and 

objects. 

(f) Compliance 

You are responsible for having the actions 

required by this AD performed within the 

compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

(g) Retained Actions and Compliance 

This paragraph restates the requirements of 

paragraph (f) of AD 2010–11–02, Amendment 

39–16307 (75 FR 28485, May 21, 2010). 

Within 10 days after February 15, 2007 (the 

effective date of AD 2007–03–05, 

Amendment 39–14916 (72 FR 4414, January 

31, 2007)), amend Section IV, Normal 

Procedures, of the following Gulfstream 

airplane flight manuals (AFMs): Model 1125 

Astra, 25W–1001–1; Model Astra SPX, SPX– 

1001–1; and Model G100, G100–1001–1; as 

applicable; to include the following 

statement. Insertion of copies of this AD at 

the appropriate places of the AFMs is 

acceptable. The actions required by this 

paragraph may be accomplished by a holder 

of a Private Pilot’s License. 

1. BEFORE ENGINE START: 

(PRE and POST Mod 20052/Gulfstream 

Service Bulletin 100–31–284): 

CABIN DOOR—CLOSED (Physically verify 

door latch handle pin is fully engaged in 

the handle lock) 

2. BEFORE TAXIING: 

Change the CABIN DOOR procedure as 

follows (POST Mod 20052/Gulfstream 

Service Bulletin 100–31–284): 

Check CABIN DOOR light—OUT 

3. BEFORE TAKE-OFF: 

Insert between the POSITION lights switch 

and the THRUST LEVERS procedures: 

(PRE Mod 20052/Gulfstream Service Bulletin 

100–31–284): 

Check CABIN DOOR light—OUT (50% N1 

may be required) 

(POST Mod 20052/Gulfstream Service 

Bulletin 100–31–284): 

Check CABIN DOOR light—OUT 

CABIN DOOR SEAL light—OUT (50% N1 

may be required) 

Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Mod 

20052 is equivalent to Gulfstream Service 

Bulletin 100–31–284, dated August 17, 2006. 

(h) Retained Modification With Reduced 

Compliance Time 

This paragraph restates the requirements of 

paragraph (g) of AD 2010–11–02, 

Amendment 39–16307 (75 FR 28485, May 21, 

2010), with reduced compliance time and 

new service information. 

(1) Within 250 flight hours after June 25, 

2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–11–02, 

Amendment 39–16307 (75 FR 28485, May 21, 

2010)), but no later than within 6 months 

after the effective date of this AD: Modify the 

warning and caution lights panel (WACLP), 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the applicable service bulletin 

identified in table 1 of this AD. 

TABLE 1—MODIFICATION SERVICE

INFORMATION

Honeywell Service 

Bulletin— Dated— 

80–0548–31–0001 .............. April 1, 2006. 

80–0548–31–0002 .............. March 1, 2006. 

80–5090–31–0001 .............. March 1, 2006. 

(2) Within 250 flight hours after June 25, 

2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–11–02, 

Amendment 39–16307 (75 FR 28485, May 21, 

2010)), but no later than within 6 months 

after the effective date of this AD: Change the 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
12998 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

WACLP and MED wiring, in accordance with 

the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100–31–284, 

dated August 17, 2006; or Gulfstream Service 

Bulletin 100–31–284, Revision 1, dated May 

27, 2011. As of the effective date of this AD, 

Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100–31–284, 

Revision 1, dated May 27, 2011, must be used 

to accomplish the actions required by this 

paragraph. 

(3) Within 250 flight hours after June 25, 

2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–11–02, 

Amendment 39–16307 (75 FR 28485, May 21, 

2010)), but no later than within 6 months 

after the effective date of this AD: Change the 

wiring harness connecting the MED to the 

WACLP, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream 

Service Bulletin 100–31–284, dated August 

17, 2006; or Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100– 

31–284, Revision 1, dated May 27, 2011. As 

of the effective date of this AD, Gulfstream 

Service Bulletin 100–31–284, Revision 1, 

dated May 27, 2011, must be used to 

accomplish the actions required by this 

paragraph. 

(4) Within 250 flight hours after June 25, 

2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–11–02, 

Amendment 39–16307 (75 FR 28485, May 21, 

2010)), but no later than within 6 months 

after the effective date of this AD: Verify that 

the log of modification of the relevant AFM 

includes reference to MOD G1–20052, and, if 

no reference is found, revise the log of 

modification of the AFM to include reference 

to the modification. 

(5) Doing the modifications specified in 

paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(4) of 

this AD terminates the requirements of 

paragraph (g) of this AD, and after the 

modifications have been done, the AFM 

limitation required by paragraph (g) of this 

AD may be removed from the AFM. 

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Tom Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–227–1622; fax: 425–227–1149. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- 

AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. The AMOC approval letter 

must specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(j) Related Information 

Refer to MCAI Israeli Airworthiness 

Directive 31–06–11–05R1, dated May 18, 

2011; and the applicable service information 

identified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(5) of 

this AD; for related information. 

(1) Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100–31– 

284, Revision 1, dated May 27, 2011. 

(2) Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100–31– 

284, dated August 17, 2006. 

(3) Honeywell Service Bulletin 80–0548– 

31–0001, dated April 1, 2006. 

(4) Honeywell Service Bulletin 80–0548– 

31–0002, dated March 1, 2006. 

(5) Honeywell Service Bulletin 80–5090– 

31–0001, dated March 1, 2006. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 

11, 2013. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–04336 Filed 2–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

19 CFR Parts 142 and 143 

[USCBP–2013–0009] 

RIN 1515–AD96 

Establishment of Due Process 

Procedures on License-Like Processes 

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, Department of Homeland 

Security; Department of the Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: This document proposes to 

amend the U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) regulations to set forth 

due process procedures for CBP to 

follow before suspending or revoking 

assigned entry filer codes, immediate 

delivery privileges or remote location 

filing privileges. These proposed 

changes will codify in the regulations 

due process procedures consistent with 

the Administrative Procedure Act before 

CBP takes actions on these programs 

depriving an importer of these 

privileges. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 29, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by USCBP docket number, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments 

via docket number USCBP–2013–0009. 

• Mail: Trade and Commercial 

Regulations Branch, Regulations and 

Rulings, Office of International Trade, 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 90 

K Street NE. (10th Floor), Washington, 

DC 20229–1177. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

USCBP docket number for this 

rulemaking. All comments received will 

be posted without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. For 

detailed instructions on submitting 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Submitted 

comments may also be inspected during 

regular business days between the hours 

of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and 

Commercial Regulations Branch, 

Regulations and Rulings, Office of 

International Trade, Customs and 

Border Protection, 90 K St. NE., 10th 

Floor, Washington, DC. Arrangements to 

inspect submitted comments should be 

made in advance by calling Joseph Clark 

at (202) 325–0118. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

operational questions, Laurie Dempsey, 

Trade Policy and Programs, Office of 

International Trade, Tel. (202) 863– 

6509. For legal questions, Blake Harden, 

Trade and Finance, Office of Chief 

Counsel, Tel. (202) 344–2972. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation 

Interested persons are invited to 

participate in this rulemaking by 

submitting written data, views, or 

arguments on all aspects of the 

proposed rule. U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) also invites comments 

that relate to the economic, 

environmental, or federalism effects that 

might result from this proposed rule. If 

appropriate to a specific comment, the 

commenter should reference the specific 

portion of the proposed rule, explain the 

reason for any recommended change, 

and include data, information, or 

authority that support such 

recommended change. 

Background 

When an agency acts to deprive a 

person of a property interest, the 

Constitution of the United States 

requires procedures that appropriately 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS