Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 1 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeG1 A 7 3 NA 5 12 GM PS Upper Midwest 924 NA NAG2 B 9 2 NA 9 2 GM PS Upper Midwest 924 NASilty GravellySandG3 C 10 7 NA 8 12 GM MSW Upper Midwest 816 NA NAG4 2 NA 0 5 180 NA GM HW Deepwater, NJ NA NA NAG5 3 NA 0 5 180 NA GM HW Deepwater, NJ NA NA NAG6 4 NA 20 50 90 NA GM HW Deepwater, NJ NA NA NAG7 CD-I 719.95 88.8 2580.6 5 NA GM NABroward County,FL NA NA NAG8 CD-II 841.5 302.9 1215.5 5 NA GM NABroward County,FL NA NA NAG9 CD-III 1187.45 203.8 3179 5 NA GM NABroward County,FL NA NA NAG10 BIC-1A 71.995 0 704.99 64 NA GM MSWBroward County,FL NA NA NAG11 BIC-1B 102.85 0 620.84 64 NA GM MSWBroward County,FL NA NA NAG12 BIC-3 267.41 110.3 767.635 16 NA GM MSWBroward County,FL NA NA NAG13 WL 14.025 0 363.715 33 NA GM NAColumbia County,FL NA NA NAG14 ME-1 4282.3 1245.4 6329.95 14 NA GM MSW Dade County, FL NA NA NAG15 ME-2 715.275 491.8 892.925 14 NA GM MSW Dade County, FL NA NA NAG16 ME-3 1060.29 545.1 1409.98 14 NA GM MSW Dade County, FL NA NA NAG17 TRL-A 20.57 0 43.945 15 NA GM MSW Duval County, FL NA NA NAG18 TRL-B 170.17 3.7 1217.37 15 NA GM MSW Duval County, FL NA NA NAG19 TRL-C 619.905 510.5 769.505 3 NA GM MSW Duval County, FL NA NA NASite ParametersTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 2 of 88LandfillCell IDG1G2G3G4G5G6G7G8G9G10G11G12G13G14G15G16G17G18G19Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?2.82 HDPE 1.5 - NA NA S Oct-90 Mar-92NA Yes2.49 HDPE 1.5 - NA 1 SFall 90 Nov-91 NA Yes1.74 HDPE 1.5 - NA NA S 1991 Feb-92 NA Yes2 CSPE 0.75 - NA 0.3 S 1978 NA NA NA2 CSPE 0.75 - NA 1 G/GN 1981 NA NA NA3.2 CSPE 1.1 - NA 2 G/GN 1988 NA NA NA1.82 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes2.43 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes2.26 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes4.55 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes4.55 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes4.65 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes2.95 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S after Aug-90 NA NA Yes0.97 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes1.90 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes2.51 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes8.09 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes7.28 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes7.28 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA YesLandfill Cell Construction/Operation InformationTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 3 of 88LandfillCell IDG1G2G3G4G5G6G7G8G9G10G11G12G13G14G15G16G17G18G19FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data Notes1 PVC NA GN 6.5 Maule et al. (1993)Initial peak volumes not included here; author attributes to sanddrainage and thawing of liner & collection system2 NA NA GN 6.5 Maule et al. (1993)Initial peak volumes not included here; author attributes to sanddrainage and thawing of liner & collection system1 NA NA GN 6.5 Maule et al. (1993)Initial peak volumes not included here; author attributes to sanddrainage and thawing of liner & collection system2 NA NA S 300Giardino andGuglielmetti (1997)Daily average LDS flows since monthly values not available. LDSflows reported here for times when infiltration water not impactingflows. Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS isincluded in LDS flow.2 NA NA S 100Giardino andGuglielmetti (1997)Daily average LDS flows since monthly values not available. LDSflows reported here for times when infiltration water not impactingflows. Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS isincluded in LDS flow.2 NA NA S 150Giardino andGuglielmetti (1997)Daily average LDS flows since monthly values not available. LDSflows reported here for times when infiltration water not impactingflows. Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS isincluded in LDS flow.NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA S/GN 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA S/GN 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA S/GN 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)Leak Detection System InformationTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 4 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG20 BL-IIIA 130.9 10.3 354.365 27 NA GMNA Marion County, FL NA NA NAG21 BL-IIIB 229.075 28.11058.42 27 NA GM NA Marion County, FL NA NA NAG22 S7L-AA 35.53 15.9 76.67 14 NA GM NAPalm BeachCounty, FL NA NA NAG23 S7L-AB 28.985 25.2 33.66 14 NA GM NAPalm BeachCounty, FL NA NA NAG24 S7L-AC 45.815 35.5 57.97 14 NA GM NAPalm BeachCounty, FL NA NA NAG25 S7L-AD 72.93 56.1 100.045 14 NA GM NAPalm BeachCounty, FL NA NA NAG26 S7L-AE 98.175 30.9 317.9 14 NA GM NAPalm BeachCounty, FL NA NA NAG27 WPL-A158.905 15.0 115.005 43 NA GM NA Pasco County, FL NA NA NAG28 WPL-SW153.295 19.6 103.785 43 NA GM NA Pasco County, FL NA NA NAG29 I 69 47 158 12 NA GM MSW Florida NA NA NAG30 VI 27 11 57 8 NA GM MSW Florida NA NA NAG31 A1-2 39 NA 12431 27 GMC&DWNortheast1120 NA Silt & SandG32 B1 517 NA 1426 34 19 GMC&DWNortheast1070 3 Coarse SandG33 B2 689 NA 1690 34 19 GM MSW Northeast 1070 3 Coarse SandG34 C1 70 NA 304 47 9 GM MSW Southeast 1120 2 Sand & ClayG35 C2 13 NA 125 33 12 GM MSW Southeast 1120 2 Sand & ClayG36 C3 17 NA 276 33 8 GM MSW Southeast 1120 2 Sand & ClayG37 C4 53 NA 147 31 4 GM MSW Southeast 1120 2 Sand & ClayG38 C5 28 NA 115 14 12 GM MSW Southeast 1120 2 Sand & ClayG39 D2 388 NA 2426 18 9 GM HW Southeast 1630 2 NAG40 D3 76 NA 341 16 12 GM HW Southeast 1630 2 NATable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 5 of 88LandfillCell IDG20G21G22G23G24G25G26G27G28G29G30G31G32G33G34G35G36G37G38G39G40Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information4.42 HDPE 2.5 - NA 2 S prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes6.26 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S after Aug-90 NA NA Yes4.20 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes3.92 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes3.96 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes3.75 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes3.29 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes4.05 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes4.05 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S prior to Aug-90 NA NA Yes15.78 (landfilltotal) NA NA - NA NA S NA Apr-93 NA NA15.78 (landfilltotal) NA NA - NA NA GN NA Apr-92 NA NA5.3 HDPE 1.5 & 2.0 - 79 4 S 1989-90 1989-90 - No6.4 CSPE 0.9 - 79 4 S Sep-92 Oct-92 - No3.3 CSPE 0.9 - 21 2 S May-84 May-84 Nov-88 No3.9 HDPE 2 - 25 2 S May-92 May-92 - No3.2 HDPE 2 - 24 2.5S Apr-90 May-90 - Yes3.7 HDPE 2 - 40 2.5 S Dec-90 Apr-91 - Yes3.6 HDPE 2 - 46 2.5S Mar-91 Aug-91 - Yes3.7 HDPE 2 - 46 2.5 S Dec-91 Feb-92 - Yes0.4 HDPE 2 - 7.9 2 SSep-85 Oct-85May-86 Yes0.3 HDPE 2 - 7.9 2 SSep-85 Jan-86 Mar-88 YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 6 of 88LandfillCell IDG20G21G22G23G24G25G26G27G28G29G30G31G32G33G34G35G36G37G38G39G40FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA S/GN 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA S/GN 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA S/GN 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA S/GN 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA S/GN 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA S 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA S 305 Tedder (1997)Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS is included inLDS flow.NA NA NA GN NAReddi and Scarlatos(1996)Calculated from LDS flow in m3/mo and cell area. Date of wasteplacement is date that monitoring began; exact date of wasteplacement not available. Possibly same as one of Tedder 1997landfills but for different monitoring periodNA NA NA GN NAReddi and Scarlatos(1996)Calculated from LDS flow in m3/mo and cell area. Date of wasteplacement is date that monitoring began; exact date of wasteplacement not available. Possibly same as one of Tedder 1997landfills but for different monitoring periodNA 17 150 PVC S 600 EPA (1998)Flows combined for cells A1 & A2. Cell A2 became operational inmonth 39.NA 38 150 PVC S 450 EPA (1998)5 38 150 PVC S 450 EPA (1998)2 91 100 PVC S 450 EPA (1998)2 91 100 PVC S 450 EPA (1998)2 91 100 PVC S 450 EPA (1998)2 91 100 PVC S 450 EPA (1998)2 91 100 PVC S 450 EPA (1998)6 37 100 HDPE S 300 EPA (1998) Near-liquid waste was disposed of in cell at several different times.6 37 100 HDPE S 300 EPA (1998)Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 7 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG41 E1 1107 NA 3069 33 7 GM MSW Northeast 1040 5 NAG42 E2 703 NA 2447 33 12 GM MSW Northeast 1040 5 NAG43 E3 1603 NA 1758 2 12 GM MSW Northeast 1040 5 NAG44 F1 66 NA 83 18 12 GM MSW Northeast 580 2 SandG45 G1 108 NA 384 55 12 GM MSW Northeast 910 2 NAG46 G2 41 NA 100 30 12 GM MSW Northeast 910 2 NAG47 H1 9 NA 65 42 13 GM HW Northeast 1020 0 NAG48 H2 31 NA 175 63 12 GM HW Northeast 1020 0 NAG49 H3 79 NA 415 47 11 GM HW Northeast 1020 0 NAG50 H4 78 NA 128 20 9 GM HW Northeast 1020 0 NAG51 H5 97 NA 149 13 7 GM HW Northeast 1020 0 NAG52 I1 16 NA 157 79 5 GM MSW Northeast 990 1 Silty ClayG53 I2 7 NA 37 69 7 GM MSW Northeast 990 1 Silty ClayG54 I3 9 NA 55 69 7 GM MSW Northeast 990 1 Silty ClayG55 J1 9 NA 13 29 3 GM MSW Northeast 760 NA SandG56 J2 8 NA 11 9 12 GM MSW Northeast 760 NA SandG57 J3 19 NA 28 8 7 GM MSW Northeast 760 NA SandG58 J4 32 NA 44 4 7 GM MSW Northeast 760 NA SandG59 J5 139 NA 149 4 7 GM MSW Northeast 760 NA SandG60 K1 271 NA 892 54 12 GM MSW Northeast 1120 NA SandG61 M1 53 NA 93 31 12 GM ASH(M) Southeast 1470 NA NAG62 N1 121 NA 354 63 12 GM MSW Southeast 1520 NA SandG63 N2 227 NA 1058 27 12 GM MSW Southeast 1520 NA SandG64 O1 1 NA 9 58 6 GM MSW Southeast 1500 NA SandG65 O2 2 NA 11 46 12 GM MSW Southeast 1500 NA SandG66 O3 112 NA 428 6 10 GM MSW Southeast 1500 NA SandG67 P1 716 NA 2585 5 12 GM ASH(M) Southeast 1500 NA NAG68 P2 832 NA 1220 5 12 GM ASH(M) Southeast 1500 NA NAG69 P3 1184 NA 3179 5 10 GM ASH(M) Southeast 1500 NA NATable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 8 of 88LandfillCell IDG41G42G43G44G45G46G47G48G49G50G51G52G53G54G55G56G57G58G59G60G61G62G63G64G65G66G67G68G69Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information0.4 CSPE 0.9 - 7.9 2 S Jun-87 Jan-89 - Yes2.4 CSPE 0.9 - 40 1.3 S Mar-88 Mar-88 - No2.4 CSPE 0.9 - 40 1.3 S Oct-87 Oct-87 - No1.2 HDPE 1.5 - 40 1.3 S Jul-90 Jul-90 - No1.8 HDPE 1.5 - NA 5 S Jul-92 Jul-92 - No3 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2S May-89 Jun-89- Yes1.7 PVC 0.8 - NA 2S Nov-92 Dec-92 - Yes0.5 PVC 0.8 - NA 3 S 1985 1985 1990 Yes1.1 PVC 0.8 - NA 3 S 1986 1986 - Yes0.9 PVC 0.8 - NA 3 S 1988 Jul-88 - Yes1.2 PVC 0.8 - NA 3 S 1990 Dec-90 - Yes1.3 HDPE 1.5 - NA 3 S 1992 Nov-92 - Yes3.2 LCRS;2.7 LDS HDPE 1.5 - 4.9 2 S Aug-87 Aug-87 Oct-94 Yes4.2 LCRS;2.3 LDS HDPE 1.5 - 7.9 2 S Oct-87 Oct-87 Oct-94 Yes4.7 PVC 1.5 - NA NA S Jul-92 Jul-92May-94 Yes1 PVC 1.5 - NA NA S Jul-90 Oct-90 Fall 93 Yes1 PVC 1.5 - NA NA S Sep-90 Apr-91 Fall 93 Yes1 PVC 1.5 - NA NA S Aug-91 Nov-91 Fall 93 Yes1 PVC 0.8 - NA NA S Aug-91 Jul-92 Fall 93 Yes1 HDPE 2 - NA NAS Nov-92 NA - Yes1.5 HDPE 1.5 - 7.6 2 S Oct-91 Feb-92 - Yes4 HDPE 2.5 - NA 2 S Late 90 Sep-91 - NA4.4 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S 1988 1988 - NA6.3 HDPE 2 - NA 2 G/S 1991 Jan-92 - Yes4.2 HDPE 2 - 7.9 3.2G/S Aug-88 Mar-88 - Yes4.9 HDPE 2 - 7.9 3.2G/S Feb-89 Mar-89 - Yes4.7 HDPE 1.5 - NA 3.2 S/GN Jan-94 Feb-94 - Yes1.8 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN 1991 1991 - Yes2.4 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S/GN 1992 Late 92-93 - YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 9 of 88LandfillCell IDG41G42G43G44G45G46G47G48G49G50G51G52G53G54G55G56G57G58G59G60G61G62G63G64G65G66G67G68G69FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System Information6 46 NA S 600 EPA (1998)6 46 NA S 600 EPA (1998)6 46 NA S 600 EPA (1998)6 37 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 100 HDPE S 300 EPA (1998)2,3 46 100 HDPE S 300 EPA (1998)2 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998) Cell partially closed after month 46.NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998) Cell partially closed after month 31.NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998) Cell partially closed during entire period of active operation.NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998) Cell partially closed during entire period of active operation.NA 30 NA S 450 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 30 months afterstart of waste placement in cell. Cell partially closed approximately53 months after start of waste placement in cell.1 30 NA S 450 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 28 months afterstart of waste placement in cell. Cell partially closed approximately53 months after start of waste placement in cell.1 30 NA S 450 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 22 months afterstart of waste placement in cell. Cell partially closed approximately53 months after start of waste placement in cell.NA NA PVC S NA EPA (1998)NA NA PVC S NA EPA (1998)NA NA PVC S NA EPA (1998)NA NA PVC S NA EPA (1998)NA NA PVC S NA EPA (1998)NA NA 150 HDPE S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA S 300 EPA (1998)NA - - GN 5 EPA (1998)NA - - GN 5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 10 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG70 Q1 12 NA 32 41 3 GM MSW Northeast 890 <2 Glacial TillG71 Q1-2 43 NA 112 14 NA GM MSW Northeast 890 <2 Glacial TillG72 S1 20 NA 68 35 10 GM MSW Northeast 1040 4 Fine SandG73 S2 5 NA 24 37 9 GM ASH(M) Northeast 1040 4 Fine SandG74 T1 17 NA 375 37 9 GM MSW Northeast 1300 20 Silt & Silty SandG75 T2 36 NA 414 26 12 GM MSW Northeast 1300 20 Silt & Silty SandG76 U1 171 NA 373 35 7 GM MSW Northeast 1070 1 NAG77 U2 36 NA 74 22 14 GM MSW Northeast 1070 1 NAG78 U3 147 NA 528 13 12 GM MSW Northeast 1070 1 NAG79 U4 1 NA 14 14 8 GM MSW Northeast 1070 1 NAG80 V1 40 NA 227 51 13 GM MSW Southeast 1730 NA NAG81 V2 41 NA 86 51 13 GM MSW Southeast 1730 NA NAG82 V3 76 NA 139 47 7 GM MSW Southeast 1730 NA NAG83 V4 79 NA 392 42 11 GM MSW Southeast 1730 NA NAG84 V5 64 NA 125 10 14 GM MSW Southeast 1730 NA NAG85 W1 27 NA 109 23 12 GM MSW Southeast 1500 NAFine Sand/ClayLayersG86 W2 358 NA 1826 27 8 GM MSW Southeast 1500 NAFine Sand/ClayLayersG87 X1 2 NA 45 26 7 GM MSW Southeast 1020 NA NAG88 VI B 350 35 900 11 0 GM/CCL HW Michigan NA NA NAG89 VI D 160 80 300 12 3 GM/CCL HW Michigan NA NA NAG90 1 90 0 550 60 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG91 2 30 0 50 60 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG92 3 310 0 3370 60 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 11 of 88LandfillCell IDG70G71G72G73G74G75G76G77G78G79G80G81G82G83G84G85G86G87G88G89G90G91G92Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information2.3 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S Late 93 Late 93 - Yes4.5 HDPE 1.5 - 30 2 S Mar-90 Mar-90 - Yes2 HDPE 2 - NA 3.5S/GN 1993 May-93 - No2 HDPE 2 - NA 0.5 S/GN Sep-90 Sep-90 - Yes1.6 HDPE 1.5 - NA 0.5 G/S Aug-90 Aug-90 - Yes3.8 HDPE 1.5 - 21 2G/S Jan-91May-91 - Yes3.8 HDPE 1.5 - 21 2 S Jan-92 Jan-92 - Yes1.9 HDPE 1.5 - 26 2.9 S Jul-86 Jul-86 Sep-88 Yes2.6 HDPE 1.5 - 26 3 S Jan-87 Jan-87 Sep-88 Yes1.5 HDPE 1.5 - 24 NA S Nov-87 Nov-87 Sep-88 Yes1.9 HDPE 1.5 - 23 NAS/GN Mar-88 Mar-88 Oct-88 Yes4.2 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN 1988 Jan-90 - Yes3.9 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN 1989 Jan-90 - Yes4 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN 1990 Nov-90 - Yes3.7 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4 S/GN 1990 Dec-90 - Yes3.3 HDPE 1.5 - NA 4S/GN 1993 May-93 - Yes15.4 HDPE 1.5 - 24 1S/GN May-92 May-92 - Yes3 HDPE 1.5 - NA 2 S 1992 Aug-92 - Yes2.48 HDPE NA >=1524 NA 2 SFall 88 Mar-89NA NA2.93 HDPE NA >=1524 NA 2 S Winter 91/92 Sep-91 NA NANA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 NA YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 12 of 88LandfillCell IDG70G71G72G73G74G75G76G77G78G79G80G81G82G83G84G85G86G87G88G89G90G91G92FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA 46 100 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 100 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)NA - - GN 13 EPA (1998)3 - - GN 13 EPA (1998)3 30 100 PVC GN 5 EPA (1998) Side slopes capped after 24 months.1,3 24 100 PVC GN 5 EPA (1998) Side slopes capped after 19 months.1,3 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998) Side slopes capped after 10 months.1,3 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998) Side slopes capped after 7 months.1,3 NA NA S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA S/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)NA - - GN 5 EPA (1998)NA - - GN 5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 7.5 Bergstrom et al. (1993)LDS flows are approximate, since numbers had to be determinedfrom a graph. Data reported here only for period of landfilling.NA NA NA GN 7.5 Bergstrom et al. (1993)LDS flows are approximate, since numbers had to be determinedfrom a graph. Data reported here only for period of landfilling; 3month initial operating period did not include landfilling.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 13 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG93 4 140 0 490 60 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG94 5 170 70 480 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG95 6 180 70 320 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG96 7 230 90 590 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG97 8 180 60 300 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG98 9 250 20 2990 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG99 10 220 40 500 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG100 11 90 30 500 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG101 12 90 30 390 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG102 13 60 0 250 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG103 14 60 10 620 29 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG104 15 10 10 30 6 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 14 of 88LandfillCell IDG93G94G95G96G97G98G99G100G101G102G103G104Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation InformationNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/88 Jan-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 8/90 Sep-90 NA YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 15 of 88LandfillCell IDG93G94G95G96G97G98G99G100G101G102G103G104FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 16 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG105 16 20 0 60 6 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG106 17 80 10 1120 45 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG107 18 190 30 1120 38 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG108 19 100 10 410 32 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG109 20 180 50 430 32 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG110 21 310 40 1220 23 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG111 22 110 20 360 23 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG112 23 80 10 360 9 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG113 24 40 20 110 9 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG114 25 50 0 610 55 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG115 26 70 0 1500 55 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG116 27 100 0 670 55 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 17 of 88LandfillCell IDG105G106G107G108G109G110G111G112G113G114G115G116Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation InformationNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 8/90 Sep-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 10/87 Nov-87 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 5/88 Jun-88 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 11/88 Dec-88 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 11/88 Dec-88 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 8/89 Sep-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 8/89 Sep-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 10/90 Nov-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Nov-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 Fall 88 YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 Fall 88 YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 18 of 88LandfillCell IDG105G106G107G108G109G110G111G112G113G114G115G116FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 19 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG117 28 90 0 1500 44 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG118 29 150 0 1400 44 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG119 30 200 0 1310 44 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG120 31 60 0 210 51 NA GM/CCL NA Arid Region NA NA NAG121 32 50 0 130 44 NA GM/CCL NA Arid Region NA NA NAG122 33 70 0 160 24 NA GM/CCL NA Arid Region NA NA NAG123 34 40 0 160 23 NA GM/CCL NA Arid Region NA NA NAG124 35 20 0 150 4 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG125 36 0 0 0 4 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG126 37 0 0 10 8 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG127 38 10 0 20 8 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG128 39 10 0 50 8 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 20 of 88LandfillCell IDG117G118G119G120G121G122G123G124G125G126G127G128Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation InformationNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 Fall 88 YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/86 Jan-87 Fall 88 YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 3/87 Jan-87 Fall 88 YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 10/87 Apr-87 Fall 88 YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 5/89 Nov-87NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 6/89 Jun-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 1/90 Jul-89 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 1/90 Feb-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/89 Feb-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/89 Jan-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/89 Jan-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/89 Jan-90 NA YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 21 of 88LandfillCell IDG117G118G119G120G121G122G123G124G125G126G127G128FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 22 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG129 40 10 0 40 8 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG130 41 0 0 10 8 NA GM/CCL NA Semi-Arid NA NA NAG131 44 430 0 3480 10 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG132 45 480 0 4700 10 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG133 46 310 0 3100 10 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG134 47 770 0 5210 10 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG135 48 810 0 6100 10 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG136 49 860 0 6880 10 NA GM/CCL NA NA NA NA NAG137 1 NA 0 1680 30 0GM/CCLnon-HW NA NA NA NAG138 2 190 0 530 5 0GM/CCLnon-HW NA NA NA NAG139 4 NA 0 310 23 0GM/CCLnon-HW NA NA NA NATable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 23 of 88LandfillCell IDG129G130G131G132G133G134G135G136G137G138G139Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation InformationNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/89 Jan-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 12/89 Jan-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 3/90 Apr-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 3/90 Apr-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 3/90 Apr-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 3/90 Apr-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 3/90 Apr-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 3/90 Apr-90 NA Yes4.29 HDPE 1.5 914 NA NA SPhase I - Winter89/90; Phase II -Summer 90Phase I - Mar-90;Phase II - Oct-90 NA NANA HDPE 1.5 914 NA NAS Fall 92Mar-93 NA NA4.54 HDPE 1.5 914 NA NAS Fall 90Mar-91 NA NATable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 24 of 88LandfillCell IDG129G130G131G132G133G134G135G136G137G138G139FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Weekly average LDS flows, since monthly data not available.Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only. Liner is damagedNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Weekly average LDS flows, since monthly data not available.Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only. Liner is damagedNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Weekly average LDS flows, since monthly data not available.Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only. Liner is damagedNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Weekly average LDS flows, since monthly data not available.Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only. Liner is damagedNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Weekly average LDS flows, since monthly data not available.Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only. Liner is damagedNA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Weekly average LDS flows, since monthly data not available.Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only. Liner is damagedNA NA NA GN NA Workman (1993)LDS flows provided on graphs, so average could not easily bedetermined and minimum and peak are approximated.NA NA NA GN NA Workman (1993)LDS flows are approximate, since data had to be determined fromgraph.NA NA NA GN NA Workman (1993)LDS flows provided on graphs, so average could not easily bedetermined and minimum and peak are approximated.Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 25 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG140 B3 135 NA 803 89 4 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 1070 3 Coarse sandG141 B4 34 NA 100 35 12 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 1070 3 Coarse sandG142 B5 9 NA 65 23 12 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 1070 3 Coarse sandG143 C6 3 NA 15 7 10 GM/CCL MSW Southeast 1120 2 Sand & ClayG144 G3 319 NA 384 13 12 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 910 2 NAG145 R1 105 NA 253 11 12 GM/CCLMSW Northeast 1040 3 Fine Sand & SiltG146 Y1 230 NA 1157 66 12 GM/CCL ASH(M) Northeast 1190 NA Glacial TillG147 Y2 153 NA 1993 44 10 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 1190 NA Glacial TillG148 Z1 78 NA 150 27 12 GM/CCL ASH(C) Northeast 1250 NA Silt & ClayG149 AA1 73 NA 794 43 8 GM/CCLMSW Northeast 1140 <2 Glacial TillG150 AA2 92 NA 133 5 15 GM/CCLMSW Northeast 1140 <2 Glacial TillG151 AA2-3 87 NA 251 34 20 GM/CCLMSW Northeast 1140 <2 Glacial TillG152 AB1 66 NA 337 82 5 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1700 NA ChalkG153 AB2 41 NA 142 65 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1700 NA ChalkG154 AB3 34 NA 232 62 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1700 NA ChalkG155 AB4 54 NA 107 50 13 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1700 NA ChalkG156 AC1 NA NA NA NA 13 GM/CCL HWWest 280 91Clay/SandstoneG157 AC2 43 NA 164 82 6 GM/CCL HWWest 280 91Clay/SandstoneG158 AC3 51 NA 159 61 12 GM/CCL HWWest 280 91Clay/SandstoneG159 AC4 47 NA 495 62 11 GM/CCL HWWest 280 91Clay/SandstoneG160 AC5 4 NA 44 21 13 GM/CCL HWWest 280 91Clay/SandstoneG161 AC6 12 NA 219 30 10 GM/CCL HWWest 280 91Clay/SandstoneG162 AC7 0 NA 0 6 12 GM/CCL HWWest 280 91Clay/SandstoneG163 AC8 2 NA 4 6 12 GM/CCL HWWest 280 91Clay/SandstoneG164 AD1 107 NA 603 12 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG165 AD2 258 NA 1517 10 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG166 AD3 231 NA 665 10 16 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG167 AD4 303 NA 1517 10 16 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 26 of 88LandfillCell IDG140G141G142G143G144G145G146G147G148G149G150G151G152G153G154G155G156G157G158G159G160G161G162G163G164G165G166G167Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information3.5 CSPE 0.9 600 21 2 S May-84 May-84 Nov-88 No6.4 HDPE 1.5 600 25 2 S Jul-87 Jul-87 - No2.9 HDPE 1.5 600 252 S Apr-91 May-91 - No2.6 HDPE 2 6 43 3 S Apr-92 Nov-92 - Yes1.6 HDPE 1.5 450 NA 2S/G May-89Jun-89 - Yes1.8 HDPE 1.5 450 302 G Dec-93 Mar-94 - Yes2.2 HDPE 2 450 NA 5.5 S Sep-88 Jan-89 - Yes3 HDPE 2 450 NA 5.5 S 1990 Jan-91 - Yes2.6 HDPE 1.5 450 23 3.2S Dec-91 Mar-92 - No1.8 HDPE 2 450 37 2 S Oct-90 Oct-90 - Yes2.6 HDPE 2 450 37 2 S Jul-90 Jul-90 - Yes3.4 HDPE 2 450 372 S Sep-91 Mar-92 - Yes3.8 HDPE 1.5 450 >90 3 G 1986 1987 - Yes4.1 HDPE 1.5 450 >90 3 G 1986 1987 - Yes5 HDPE 1.5 450 >90 3 G Oct-87 Feb-88 - Yes5.8 HDPE 1.5 450 >903 G Apr-89 May-89 - Yes4.6 HDPE 1.5 450 302 S Feb-87 Mar-87 - Yes4.2 HDPE 1.5 450 302 S Dec-87 Mar-88 - Yes4.6 HDPE 1.5 450 30 2 S Jun-89 Jun-89 - Yes3.8 HDPE 1.5 450 30 2 S Jul-89 Jul-89 - Yes6.9 HDPE 1.5 450 NA NAGN Mar-92 Mar-92 - Yes6.9 HDPE 1.5 450 NA NAGN Mar-92 Mar-92 - Yes4 HDPE 1.5 450 NA NA GN Dec-93 Jan-94 - Yes6.1 HDPE 1.5 450 NA NA GN Dec-93 Jan-94 - Yes0.6 HDPE 1.5 900 21 2.5S May-85 May-85Jul-88 Yes0.6 HDPE 1.5 900 21 2.5 S Jul-85 Jul-85 Jul-88 Yes0.6 HDPE 1.5 900 21 2.5S Nov-85 Nov-85 Jul-88 Yes0.6 HDPE 1.5 900 21 2.5S Nov-85 Nov-85 Jul-88 YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 27 of 88LandfillCell IDG140G141G142G143G144G145G146G147G148G149G150G151G152G153G154G155G156G157G158G159G160G161G162G163G164G165G166G167FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System Information5 30 150 PVC S 450 EPA (1998) 65% of cell closed after 65 months of start of waste placement.2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 91 150 PVC S 450 EPA (1998)2,3 23 100 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 HDPE GN 10 EPA (1998)1 30 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)1 30 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)1 NA NA S 300 EPA (1998)1 NA NA S 300 EPA (1998)1 NA NA S 300 EPA (1998)1 NA NA S 300 EPA (1998)2 NA NAG/GN (B);GN (S) 300/5 EPA (1998)2 NA NAG/GN (B);GN (S) 300/5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 56 months afterstart of waste placement.2 NA NAG/GN (B);GN (S) 300/5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 41 months afterstart of waste placement.2 NA NAG/GN (B);GN (S) 300/5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 40 months afterstart of waste placement.2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 30 (B) NA S (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)2 30 (B) NA S (B); GN (S) 300 EPA (1998)2 30 (B) NA S (B); GN (S) 300 EPA (1998)2 30 (B) NA S (B); GN (S) 300 EPA (1998)Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 28 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG168 AD5 547 NA 1417 10 9 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG169 AD6 763 NA 1295 10 9 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG170 AD7 56 NA 393 27 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG171 AD8 134 NA 1259 56 8 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG172 AD9 49 NA 297 49 9 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG173 AD10 111 NA 471 67 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG174 AD11 84 NA 214 64 5 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG175 AD12 121 NA 406 56 13 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG176 AD13 140 NA 490 43 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG177 AD14 133 NA 364 43 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG178 AD15 143 NA 270 26 13 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG179 AD16 196 NA 568 27 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG180 AD17 104 NA 119 4 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG181 AD18 83 NA 113 7 12 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1830 0 Sandy Silt/ClayG182 AE1 150 NA 1111 68 12 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 1210 3-7 Clay & SiltG183 AE2 174 NA 267 41 8 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 1210 3-7 Clay & SiltG184 AF1 38 NA 95 51 12 GM/CCL ASH(M) Northeast 1120 2 NAG185 AG1 1 NA 2 26 7 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 840 <2 ClayG186 AH1 64 NA 103 22 6GM/CCLMSW/ASH(M) Northeast 840 4 Silty SandG187 AH2 62 NA 89 23 5GM/CCLMSW/ASH(M) Northeast 840 4 Silty SandG188 AH3 36 NA 78 22 6GM/CCLMSW/ASH(M) Northeast 840 4 Silty SandG189 AH4 28 NA 83 16 12GM/CCLMSW/ASH(M) Northeast 840 4 Silty SandG190 AH5 31 NA 82 16 12GM/CCLMSW/ASH(M) Northeast 840 4 Silty SandG191 AJ1 24 NA 47 7 6 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 1250 NA Silt & ClayG192 AL1 164 NA 367 42 12 GM/CCLMSW Northeast 790 3 Sand & GravelTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 29 of 88LandfillCell IDG168G169G170G171G172G173G174G175G176G177G178G179G180G181G182G183G184G185G186G187G188G189G190G191G192Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information0.5 HDPE 1.5 900 21 2.5 S Jun-86 Jun-86 Jul-88 Yes0.9 HDPE 1.5 900 21 2.5 S Jun-86 Jun-86 Jul-88 Yes1.5 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Sep-87 Sep-87 Oct-93 Yes1.5 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Apr-88 Apr-88 Oct-93 Yes1.3 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Dec-88 Dec-88 Oct-93 Yes1.3 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Dec-88 Dec-88 - Yes1.1 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Aug-89 Aug-89 - Yes1.1 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Aug-89 Aug-89 - Yes1.1 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Oct-90 Oct-90 - Yes1.1 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Oct-90 Oct-90 - Yes1.1 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Apr-92 Apr-92 - Yes1.1 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Apr-92 Apr-92 - Yes1.7 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5S Mar-94 Mar-94 - Yes1.7 HDPE 1.5 900 24 2.5 S Nov-93 Nov-93 - Yes4.5 HDPE 2 600 352 S Apr-88 May-88 - Yes5.3 HDPE 2 600 352 S Nov-90 Dec-90 - Yes2.2 HDPE 1.5 450 26 2.2S Nov-89 Jan-90 - Yes8.1 HDPE 2 450 30 5G/S Mar-92 Apr-92 - Yes1.2 HDPE 2 450 NA 3 S Apr-91 Nov-91 - Yes1.1 HDPE 2 450 NA 3 S Apr-91 Nov-91 - Yes1.1 HDPE 2 450 NA 3 S Apr-91 Nov-91 - Yes1.1 HDPE 2 450 NA 3 S Apr-91 Nov-91 - Yes1 HDPE 2 450 NA 3 S Apr-91 Nov-91 - Yes3.6 HDPE 1.5 450 NA2 S Mar-94 Jun-94 - No14.9 HDPE 1.5 900 68 1 S 1988-89 1990 - YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 30 of 88LandfillCell IDG168G169G170G171G172G173G174G175G176G177G178G179G180G181G182G183G184G185G186G187G188G189G190G191G192FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System Information2 30 (B) NA S (B); GN (S) 300 EPA (1998)2 30 (B) NA S (B); GN (S) 300 EPA (1998)2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 12 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 12 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 12 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 41 months afterstart of waste placement. Half of cell closed approximately 59months after start of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 41 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 41 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 41 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 41 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 41 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 41 months afterstart of waste placement.2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 53 (B) NA GN 5 EPA (1998)NA 46 100 HDPE S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 100 HDPE S 300 EPA (1998)NA 61 150 S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)NA 46 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)2 30 150 PVC S 300 EPA (1998)3 ND 150 PVC GN 5 EPA (1998)Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 31 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG193 AM1 6 NA 64 72 9 GM/CCL MSWWest 430 14SiltG194 AM2 6 NA 42 72 9 GM/CCL MSWWest 430 14SiltG195 AN1-4 523 NA 580 3 - GM/CCL ASH(M) Northeast 1120 5 SandG196 AO1 119 NA 353 31 5GM/CCL MSW Northeast 830 3 Silty SandG197 AO2 70 NA 158 25 5GM/CCL MSW Northeast 830 3 Silty SandG198 AP1 26 NA 100 36 12 GM/CCL HWWest 380>1500 ShaleG199 AQ1 196 NA 1239 52 6 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG200 AQ2 267 NA 1550 46 12 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG201 AQ3 286 NA 1390 42 12 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG202 AQ4 160 NA 278 40 13 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG203 AQ5 109 NA 709 38 12 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG204 AQ6 222 NA 766 39 12 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG205 AQ7 97 NA 488 36 6 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG206 AQ8 111 NA 349 14 12 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG207 AQ9 126 NA 429 14 12 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG208 AQ10 42 NA 250 17 9 GM/CCL HW Northeast 970 0 NAG209 AS1 34 NA 110 24 3 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1420 1 NAG210 AT1 8 NA 15 3 5 GM/CCL HWWest 740 3ClayG211 AU1 42 NA 274 28 4 GM/CCL MSW Northeast 1020 3 Clay & SandG212 AV1 53 NA 660 92 12GM/CCL HW Northeast 790 3 Silty ClayG213 AV2 32 NA 319 79 12GM/CCL HW Northeast 790 3 Silty ClayG214 AV3 41 NA 188 61 13GM/CCL HW Northeast 790 3 Silty ClayG215 AV4 124 NA 372 61 5GM/CCL HW Northeast 790 3 Silty ClayG216 AV5 98 NA 205 28 12GM/CCL HW Northeast 790 3 Silty ClayG217 L1 148 NA 749 58 3GM/CCL (B);GM (S) HW Southeast 1140 6 ClayG218 L2 115 NA 869 52 7GM/CCL (B);GM (S) HW Southeast 1140 6 ClayG219 L3 31 NA 537 36 5GM/CCL (B);GM (S) HW Southeast 1140 6 ClayTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 32 of 88LandfillCell IDG193G194G195G196G197G198G199G200G201G202G203G204G205G206G207G208G209G210G211G212G213G214G215G216G217G218G219Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information3.2 LCRS;2.4 LDS HDPE 2 450 27 6 G/S Sep-90 Oct-90 - Yes4.8 LCRS;2.4 LDS HDPE 2 450 27 6 G/S Sep-90 Oct-90 - Yes0.2LMDPE &HDPE 2 450 52 0.8 S/GN Sep-93 Sep-93 - Yes1.8 HDPE 1.5 900 23 1 S Jan-92 Jan-92 - Yes1.8 HDPE 1.5 900 23 1 S Jul-92 Jul-92 - Yes1.9 HDPE 2900 (B); 1400(S) 13 2 S Dec-89 Jul-91 - Yes0.6 HDPE 2 450 21 2G/GN Mar-86 Mar-86 Early 90 Yes0.5 HDPE 2 450 21 2G/GN Mar-86 Mar-86 Early 90 Yes0.5 HDPE 2 450 21 2G/GN Mar-86Jul-86 Early 90 Yes0.6 HDPE 2 450 21 2G/GN Mar-86 Aug-86Early 90 Yes0.7 HDPE 2 450 21 2 G/GN Sep-86 Apr-87 Mid 91 Yes0.5 HDPE 2 450 21 2 G/GN Sep-86 Apr-87 Mid 91 Yes0.8 HDPE 2 450 21 2 G/GN Sep-86 Apr-87 Mid 91 Yes0.8 HDPE 2 450 21 2 G/GN Sep-86 Jan-89 Mid 91 Yes0.5 HDPE 2 450 21 2 G/GN Sep-86 Jan-89 Mid 91 Yes0.9 HDPE 2 450 21 2 G/GN Sep-86 Jan-89 Mid 91 Yes1 HDPE 2900 (B); 600(S) 9.8 3 GNMar-89 Jul-89Oct-91 Yes2.6 HDPE 1.5 450 11 1.5S Dec-87 Apr-88 Nov-88 Yes2.9 HDPE 1.5 900 23 1.5 G Sep-90 Jan-91 - Yes3.1 HDPE 2 1500 20 2 G Sep-86 Sep-86 - No2.4 HDPE 2 1500 20 2 S Oct-87 Oct-87 - No2.5 HDPE 2 1500 202 S Jun-88 Mar-89 - No2 HDPE 2 1500 20 2 S Oct-89 Nov-89 - Yes2.9 HDPE 2 1500 23 2 S Aug-91 Jan-92 - Yes2.7 HDPE 1.5 300 15 4.5 S Oct-89 Dec-89 - No1.5 HDPE 1.5 300 7.6 2 S Jun-90 Aug-90 - Yes1.5 HDPE 1.5 300 7.6 2 S Apr-93 Jan-94 - YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 33 of 88LandfillCell IDG193G194G195G196G197G198G199G200G201G202G203G204G205G206G207G208G209G210G211G212G213G214G215G216G217G218G219FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA - - GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 5 months after startof waste placement.NA - - GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 5 months after startof waste placement.NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 - - GN 5 EPA (1998)2 - - GN 5 EPA (1998)1,4 - - GN 5 EPA (1998)2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998) Cell final closure date approximate.2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998) Cell final closure date approximate.2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)2 61 NA G/GN 300/5 EPA (1998)NA - - GN 5 EPA (1998)NA 122 (B)1.2 x 0.3 G(B) GN 5 EPA (1998)NA - - GN 6 EPA (1998)NA 30 NA GN 10 EPA (1998)NA 30 NA GN 10 EPA (1998)NA 30 NA GN 10 EPA (1998)NA 30 NA GN 10 EPA (1998)NA 30 (B)25 x 610 GN(B) GN 8 EPA (1998)NA 20 NA S 300 EPA (1998) GM and CCL separated by a geotextile.NA 20 NA S 300 EPA (1998) GM and CCL separated by a geotextile.NA 20 NA S 300 EPA (1998) GM and CCL separated by a geotextile.Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 34 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG220 L4 76 NA 280 13 5GM/CCL (B);GM (S) HW Southeast 1140 6 ClayG221 AI1 82 NA 227 38 12GM/CCL (B);GM (S)C&DWNortheast1140 NA SandG222 AI2 66 NA 156 44 6GM/CCL (B);GM (S)C&DWNortheast1140 NA SandG223 AN1 13 NA 21 5 7GM/CCL (B);GM (S) ASH(M)West 430 14SiltG224 AN1-2 46 NA 136 5 -GM/CCL (B);GM (S) ASH(M) Northeast 1120 5 SandG225 AN1-3 137 NA 368 14 -GM/CCL (B);GM (S) ASH(M) Northeast 1120 5 SandG226 42 1410 100 4530 8 NA GM/CCL8 NA NA NA NA NAG227 43 1200 0 4390 23 NA GM/CCL8 NA NA NA NA NAG228 5.85 NA NA 96 0 GM/GCL MSW Mid-Atlantic NA NA NAG229 BRL-3 31.79 0 180.455 6 NA GM/GCL NAOkeechobeeCounty, FL NA NA NAG230 BRL-7 5.61 0 53.295 10 NA GM/GCL NAOkeechobeeCounty, FL NA NA NAG231 I4 26 NA 142 14 12 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 990 1 Silty ClayG232 I5 11 NA 54 9 12 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 990 1 Silty ClayG233 AX1 0 NA 0 31 2 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG234 AX2 2 NA 21 31 5 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG235 AX3 4 NA 47 51 5 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG236 AX4 1 NA 13 44 12 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 35 of 88LandfillCell IDG220G221G222G223G224G225G226G227G228G229G230G231G232G233G234G235G236Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information1.5 HDPE 1.5 300 7.62 S May-90 Jun-90- Yes3.5 HDPE 2 450 49 2.5 S Nov-90 Nov-90 - No2.8 HDPE 2 450 49 2.5 S Nov-90 Nov-90 - No1.2 LMDPE 2 450 52 2.5 S/GN Jun-91 Jun-91 - Yes0.5LMDPE &HDPE 2 450 52 NA S/GN Jun-92 Jun-92 - Yes0.5LMDPE &HDPE 2 450 52 NAS/GN Jun-92 Nov-92- YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 5/88 Jan-90 NA YesNA HDPE 1.5 460 See note 9 NA GNBetween 1985and 3/90 Jun-88 NA Yes51 HDPE 1.5 NA NA 2 G 1988 1989 NA Yes3.08 HDPE 1.5 NA NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes1.94 HDPE 1.5 NA NA 2 S/GN after Aug-90 NA NA Yes3.4 LCRS;1.8 LDS HDPE 1.5 6 7.9 2 TC/G Apr-88 Apr-88 Oct-94 Yes4.7 HDPE 1.5 6 NA NATC/G May-92 May-92 Jul-94 Yes2 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Jun-88 Jul-88 Feb-91 Yes2 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Jun-88 Jul-88 Feb-91 Yes1.7 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Aug-88 Sep-88 Apr-93 Yes1.7 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Aug-88 Sep-88 Apr-93 YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 36 of 88LandfillCell IDG220G221G222G223G224G225G226G227G228G229G230G231G232G233G234G235G236FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA 20 NA S 300 EPA (1998) GM and CCL separated by a geotextile.NA 15 (B) 150 PVC (B) S (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)NA 15 (B) 150 PVC (B) S (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998) HDPE on upper side slopes.NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. Liner is damaged.NA NA NA GN NAFeeney and Maxson(1993)Waste placement start date is date that monitoring began; exactdate of waste placement not provided. Liner is damaged.NA NA NA S 305Eith and Koerner(1997)Weekly average LDS flow, since monthly values not availalble.Flows from 2 LDSs added, since don't know the area collected byeach. Unknown whether intial drainage period of sand LDS isincluded in LDS flow.NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)NA NA NA GN NA Tedder (1997)1 NA NA GN 10 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)NA NA NA GN 10 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 34 months afterstart of waste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 34 months afterstart of waste placement in cell.Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 37 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG237 AX5 2 NA 37 69 11 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG238 AX6 0 NA 0 69 9 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG239 AX7 2 NA 9 66 10 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG240 AX8 0 NA 0 57 14 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG241 AX9 0 NA 0 57 9 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG242 AX10 0 NA 0 52 11 GM/GCLMSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG243 AX11 0 NA 0 48 14 GM/GCLMSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG244 AX12 0 NA 0 44 12 GM/GCLMSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG245 AX13 0 NA 0 46 7 GM/GCLMSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG246 AX14 0 NA 0 28 10 GM/GCLMSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG247 AX15 0 NA 0 25 12 GM/GCLMSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG248 AX16 0 NA 0 19 10 GM/GCLMSW Northeast 1040 1 Sand & GravelG249 AZ1 2 NA 22 19 12 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 760 2 SandG250 BB1 6 NA 25 41 6 GM/GCL MSW Southeast 1090 2 NAG251 BB2 0 NA 0 12 11 GM/GCL MSW Southeast 1090 2 NAG252 BB3 0 NA 1 12 11 GM/GCL MSW Southeast 1090 2 NAG253 AW1,324 NA 127 13 -GM/GCL &GM MSW Southeast 1120 2 Silty SandG254 AW2,433 NA 83 10 -GM/GCL &GM MSW Southeast 1120 2 Silty SandG255 AK1-2 492 NA 1424 5 10 GM/GCL/CCLMSW Northeast 760 NA Silt & ClayTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 38 of 88LandfillCell IDG237G238G239G240G241G242G243G244G245G246G247G248G249G250G251G252G253G254G255Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information2.8 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Sep-88 Oct-88 - Yes3.9 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Dec-88 Dec-88 - Yes2.6 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Jan-89 Feb-89 - Yes3.8 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Jul-89 Jul-89 - Yes3.3 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Dec-89 Dec-89 - Yes3.9 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Feb-90 Jul-90 - Yes3 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Feb-90 Feb-90 - Yes4 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Oct-90 Oct-90 - Yes3 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Jan-91 Jan-91 - Yes2.8 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Apr-92 Apr-92 - Yes2.8 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G May-92 May-92 - Yes4.5 HDPE 1.5 6 24 2 G Jan-93 Jan-93 - Yes3.8 HDPE 1.5 250 41 2 S Sep-92 Dec-92 - Yes4 HDPE 1.5 6 28 2 S Dec-90 Feb-91 - Yes2.4 HDPE 1.5 6 30 2 S Jan-93 Jan-93 - Yes2.8 HDPE 1.5 6 30 2 S Jan-93 Jan-93 - Yes2.4 HDPE 1.5 6 & - 21 2 S Jul-93 Aug-93 - Yes2.4 HDPE 1.5 6 & - 21 2 S Jun-94 Aug-94 - Yes1.6 HDPE 1.5 6/600 34 1 S/GN Oct-94 Oct-94 - YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 39 of 88LandfillCell IDG237G238G239G240G241G242G243G244G245G246G247G248G249G250G251G252G253G254G255FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System Information2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 33 months afterstart of waste placement in cell. Cell partially closed approximately55 months after start of waste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 30 months afterstart of waste placement in cell. Cell partially closed approximately53 months after start of waste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell was partially closed approximately 51 months after start ofwaste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell was partially closed approximately 46 months after start ofwaste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell was partially closed approximately 41 months after start ofwaste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell was partially closed approximately 34 months after start ofwaste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell was partially closed approximately 39 months after start ofwaste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell may have been partially closed approximately 31 months afterstart of waste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)Cell may have been partially closed approximately 28 months afterstart of waste placement in cell.2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)2 30 (B) 100 PVC (B) G (B); GN (S) 300 (B); 5 (S) EPA (1998)NA - - GN 5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 NA NA GN 5 EPA (1998)2 91 150 HDPE S 300 EPA (1998)2 91 150 HDPE GN 5 EPA (1998)2 61 200 HDPE GN 5 EPA (1998)Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 40 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersG256 AR1 167 NA 470 25 11 GM/GCL/CCL MSW Northeast 1140 <2 ClayG257 AR1-2 92 NA 217 4 - GM/GCL/CCL MSW Northeast 1140 <2 ClayG258 BA1 92 NA 316 28 14 GM/GCL/GMHW Northeast 860 14 Silty & Sandy ClayG259 BA2 12 NA 39 10 2 GM/GCL/GMHW Northeast 860 14 Silty & Sandy ClayTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 41 of 88LandfillCell IDG256G257G258G259Cell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation Information9.7 HDPE 1.5 6/300 11 2G/TC 1992 Mar-92 - Yes2 HDPE 1.5 6/300 11 2G/TC 1995 Mar-95 - Yes3 HDPE 2 6 27 4 S Jun-91 Oct-91 - Yes3.2 HDPE 2 6 27 4 S Nov-93 Apr-94 - YesTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 42 of 88LandfillCell IDG256G257G258G259FlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationNA 46 100 PVC GN 10 EPA (1998)Cell has four subareas. Waste placement started in months 1, 5,20, and 26 in subareas 1 through 4, respectively.NA 46 100 PVC GN 10 EPA (1998)NA NA 25 GN GN 5 EPA (1998)Cell received intermediate cover approximately 42 months afterstart of waste placement in cell.NA NA 25 GN GN 5 EPA (1998)Table 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 43 of 88LandfillCell IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo)Length ofInitialOperatingPeriod (mo) Liner Type2,3Type of Waste4LocationAverageAnnualRainfall(mm)Depth toGroundWater (mm)Subsurface SoilTypeSite ParametersNotes:1. The ID used in the literature source to identify the cell.2. GM = geomembrane; CCL = compacted clay liner; GCL = geosynthetic clay liner3. B = base; S = sides4. MSW = municipal solid waste; HW = hazardous waste; PS = paper sludge; ASH(M) = municipal ash; ASH( C) = coal ash; C&DW = construction and demolition waste5. HDPE = high density polyethylene; PVC = polyvinyl chloride; CSPE = chlorosulfonated polyethylene; LMDPE = linear medium density polyethylene6. G = gravel, S = sand, GN = geonet, TC = tire chips7. Codes for method of flow measurement:1 = Automatic pumping system, liquid volume recorded from accumulating flow meter.2 = Periodic pumping if liquid present in sump, volume recorded from accumulating flow meter.3 = Periodically measure time to fill a known volume.4 = Automatic pumping system from sump to a holding tank, volume transferred from holding tank measured.5 = Periodic pumping if liquid present in sump, volume estimated from change in liquid level.6 = Automatic pumping system, liquid volume estimated by multiplying pump capacity x time.8. A bentonite mat is used as the clay component.9. The average waste height varies from about 15 m to 45 m, and is typically 24 to 30 m.NA = not available- = not applicableTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 44 of 88LandfillCell IDCell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5GM LinerThickness(mm)GCL or CCLThickness(m)MaximumHeight ofWaste (m)AverageLiner BaseSlope (%)LCRSMaterial6EndConstructionDateWastePlacement StartDateFinalClosureDateFormal CQAProgram?Landfill Cell Construction/Operation InformationTable 3.1-2. LDS Flow Database for Landfill Cells with Geomembrane or Composite Liners.page 45 of 88LandfillCell IDFlowMeasurement Methodfor LDS7Pipe or SwaleSize &Material3(mmor m)Pipe orSwaleSpacing (m)Material ofDrainageLayer3,6Thickness ofDrainageLayer3(mm) Source of Data NotesLeak Detection System InformationTable 3.1-4. LDS Flow Database for Landfills with Geomembrane or Composite Liners During the Post-Closure Period.page 46 of 88Landfill CellID1Cell ID fromLiteratureSource2AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo) Liner Type3Type ofWaste4LocationCell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5FinalClosureDateMaterial ofDrainageLayer6,7G115-G120 26-31 50 15 85 34 GM/CCL NA NA 7.7 HDPE Fall 88 GNG32 B1 210 NA 1134 60 GMC&DWNortheast 6.4 CSPE - SG33 B2 189 NA 514 25 GMMSW Northeast 3.3CSPE Nov-88 SNA D1 41 NA 886 43 GMHW Southeast 0.4HDPE May-86 SG39 D2 6 NA 51 20 GM HW Southeast 0.4HDPE May-86 SG47 H1 1 NA 12 33 GM HW Northeast 1.7 PVC - SG52 I1 62 NA 119 9 GM MSW Northeast 1.3 HDPE - SG53 I2 2 NA 4 9 GM MSW Northeast3.2 LCRS;2.7 LDS HDPE Oct-94 SG54 I3 3 NA 12 9 GM MSW Northeast4.2 LCRS;2.3 LDS HDPE Oct-94 SG231 I4 59 NA 133 10 GM/GCL MSW Northeast3.4 LCRS;1.8 LDS HDPE Oct-94 GNG232 I5 2 NA 8 13 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 4.7 HDPE Jul-94 GNG164 AD1 21 NA 103 89GM/CCL HW Southeast 0.6 HDPE Jul-88S (B); GN(S)G165 AD2 21 NA 62 89GM/CCL HW Southeast 0.6 HDPE Jul-88S (B); GN(S)G166 AD3 52 NA 148 89GM/CCL HW Southeast 0.6 HDPE Jul-88S (B); GN(S)G167 AD4 27 NA 90 89GM/CCL HW Southeast 0.6 HDPE Jul-88S (B); GN(S)G168 AD5 106 NA 486 89GM/CCL HW Southeast 0.5 HDPE Jul-88S (B); GN(S)G169 AD6 39 NA 173 89GM/CCL HW Southeast 0.9 HDPE Jul-88S (B); GN(S)G170 AD7 83 NA 172 18 GM/CCLHW Southeast 1.5 HDPE Oct-93 GNG171 AD8 274 NA 564 20 GM/CCLHW Southeast 1.5 HDPE Oct-93 GNG172 AD9 22 NA 135 21 GM/CCLHW Southeast 1.3 HDPE Oct-93 GNG199 AQ1 115 NA 246 39 GM/CCLHW Northeast 0.6 HDPE Early 90 G/GNTable 3.1-4. LDS Flow Database for Landfills with Geomembrane or Composite Liners During the Post-Closure Period.page 47 of 88Landfill CellID1G115-G120G32G33NAG39G47G52G53G54G231G232G164G165G166G167G168G169G170G171G172G199ProtectiveSoilThickness(mm)DrainageLayer Type6,7DrainageLayerThickness7(mm)Type ofBarrierLayer3,7BarrierLayerMaterial6Barrier LayerThickness(mm)Barrier LayerSoilThickness(mm) Source of Data NotesNA GN/GT NA GM/CCL HDPE 1 600Feeney andMaxson (1993)LDS flow rates are for 6 combined cells and areapproximated from graph. CCL and LDS systempresent on base liner only.300 S450 (T); 150(S)GM (T);CCL (S) HDPE 1 300 EPA (1998)300 S450 (T); 150(S)GM (T);CCL (S) HDPE 1 300 EPA (1998)600 GN/S 5/150 CCL/GM HDPE 2 600 EPA (1998) Barrier layer is a CCL underlain by a GM600 GN/S 5/150 CCL/GM HDPE 2 600 EPA (1998)Near-liquid waste was disposed of in cell at severaldifferent times. Barrier layer is a CCL underlain by aGM.690 S (T); GT (S) 200 GM/CCL PVC 1 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM HDPE 1 - EPA (1998)Cell partially closed approximately 53 months after startof waste placement in cell.600 GN 5 GM HDPE 1 - EPA (1998)Cell partially closed approximately 53 months after startof waste placement in cell.600 GN 5 GM HDPE 1 - EPA (1998)Cell partially closed approximately 53 months after startof waste placement in cell.600 GN 5 GM HDPE 1 - EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM HDPE 1 - EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 GN 5 GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 600 EPA (1998)600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900EPA (1998) Cell final closure date approximate.Cover System DetailsTable 3.1-4. LDS Flow Database for Landfills with Geomembrane or Composite Liners During the Post-Closure Period.page 48 of 88Landfill CellID1Cell ID fromLiteratureSource2AverageMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)MinimumMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)PeakMonthlyLDS FlowRate (lphd)Period ofMeasurement (mo) Liner Type3Type ofWaste4LocationCell Area(ha)GM LinerMaterial5FinalClosureDateMaterial ofDrainageLayer6,7G200 AQ2 87 NA 287 39 GM/CCLHW Northeast 0.5 HDPE Early 90 G/GNG201 AQ3 129 NA 281 39 GM/CCLHW Northeast 0.5 HDPE Early 90 G/GNG202 AQ4 106 NA 204 39 GM/CCLHW Northeast 0.6 HDPE Early 90 G/GNG203 AQ5 60 NA 131 34 GM/CCL HW Northeast 0.7 HDPE Mid 91 G/GNG204 AQ6 134 NA 227 28 GM/CCL HW Northeast 0.5 HDPE Mid 91 G/GNG205 AQ7 48 NA 108 37 GM/CCL HW Northeast 0.8 HDPE Mid 91 G/GNG206 AQ8 39 NA 77 37 GM/CCL HW Northeast 0.8 HDPE Mid 91 G/GNG207 AQ9 81 NA 206 37 GM/CCL HW Northeast 0.5 HDPE Mid 91 G/GNG208 AQ10 24 NA 75 37 GM/CCL HW Northeast 0.9 HDPE Mid 91 G/GNG209 AS1 3 NA 35 44 GM/CCL HW Southeast 1 HDPE Oct-91 GNG210 AT1 0 NA 1 25 GM/CCL HWWest 2.6HDPE Nov-88 GNG233 AX1 0 NA 0 50 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 2 HDPE Feb-91G (B); GN(S)G234 AX2 0 NA 0 50 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 2 HDPE Feb-91G (B); GN(S)G235 AX3 1 NA 10 25 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1.7 HDPE Apr-93G (B); GN(S)G236 AX4 0 NA 0 25 GM/GCL MSW Northeast 1.7 HDPE Apr-93G (B); GN(S)Notes:1. The same cell ID is used in Table 3.1-2.2. The ID used in the literature source to identify the cell.3. GM = geomembrane; CCL = compacted clay liner; GCL = geosynthetic clay liner4. MSW = municipal solid waste; HW = hazardous waste; PS = paper sludge; ASH(M) = municipal ash; ASH( C) = coal ash; C&DW = construction and demolitionw5. HDPE = high density polyethylene; PVC = polyvinyl chloride; CSPE = chlorosulfonated polyethylene; LMDPE = linear medium density polyethylene6. G = gravel, S = sand, GN = geonet, TC = tire chips7. B = base; S = sides; T = topNA = not available- = not applicableTable 3.1-4. LDS Flow Database for Landfills with Geomembrane or Composite Liners During the Post-Closure Period.page 49 of 88Landfill CellID1G200G201G202G203G204G205G206G207G208G209G210G233G234G235G236ProtectiveSoilThickness(mm)DrainageLayer Type6,7DrainageLayerThickness7(mm)Type ofBarrierLayer3,7BarrierLayerMaterial6Barrier LayerThickness(mm)Barrier LayerSoilThickness(mm) Source of Data NotesCover System Details600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900EPA (1998) Cell final closure date approximate.600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)600 NA NA GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)450 - - GM/CCL HDPE 1.5 900 EPA (1998)300 S 200 GM/CCL HDPE 1 600 EPA (1998)600 GN (T); S (S) 5 (T); 150 (S)GM (T);CCL (S) HDPE 1 300 EPA (1998)600 GN (T); S (S) 5 (T); 150 (S)GM (T);CCL (S) HDPE 1 300 EPA (1998)600 GN (T); S (S) 5 (T); 150 (S)GM (T);CCL (S) HDPE 1 300 EPA (1998)600 GN (T); S (S) 5 (T); 150 (S)GM (T);CCL (S) HDPE 1 300 EPA (1998)wasteTable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 50 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L1 1 1995 18500 France domestic landfill HDPE 2 high high yesL2 2 1996 14926 France domestic landfill HDPE 2 high high yesL3 3 1994 13480 France HW landfill HDPE 2 high high yesL4 4 1995 11652 France HW landfill HDPE 2 high high yesL5 5 1997 8200 France HW landfill HDPE 2 high high yesL6 6 1998 9284 France HW landfill HDPE 2 high high yesL7 7 1995 67100 Canadawaste watertreatment pond PBGM 3 high low yesL8 8 1995 66150 Canadawaste watertreatment pond PBGM 3 high low yesL9 9 1997 11460 Canada black liqueur pond PP 1.14 high high yesL10 10 1998 18135 France domestic landfill HDPE 2 high high yesL11 11 1995 2021 Canada process water pond HDPE 2 fair high noL12 1 NA 195 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL13 2 NA 223 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL14 3 NA 232 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL15 4 NA 281 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL16 5 NA 290 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL17 6 NA 302 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL18 7 NA 302 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL19 8 NA 330 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL20 9 NA 358 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL21 10 NA 372 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL22 11 NA 393 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL23 12 NA 393 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL24 13 NA 393 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL25 14 NA 530 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 51 of 88Site IDL1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9L10L11L12L13L14L15L16L17L18L19L20L21L22L23L24L25HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes0 0 5 5 NA 2.7 Rollin et al. (1999)4 0 2 6 NA 4.02 Rollin et al. (1999)1 1 1 3 NA 2.23 Rollin et al. (1999)1 2 2 5 NA 4.29 Rollin et al. (1999)0 0 0 0 NA 0 Rollin et al. (1999)0 1 0 1 NA 1.08 Rollin et al. (1999)3 0 2 5 NA 0.75 Rollin et al. (1999)1 1 7 9 NA 1.36 Rollin et al. (1999)2 2 2 6 NA 5.24 Rollin et al. (1999)0 3 3 6 NA 3.31 Rollin et al. (1999)0 0 3 3 NA 14.84 Rollin et al. (1999)0 NA 0 0 NA 0 Laine and Darilek (1993)4 NA 2 6 NA 269.1 Laine and Darilek (1993)1 NA 1 2 NA 86.1 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 0 0 NA 0 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 1 1 NA 34.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)1 NA 6 7 NA 231.8 Laine and Darilek (1993)1 NA 1 2 NA 66.2 Laine and Darilek (1993)1 NA 3 4 NA 121.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 0 0 NA 0 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 1 1 NA 26.9 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 9 9 NA 229.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 1 1 NA 25.5 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 1 1 NA 25.5 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 8 8 NA 151.1 Laine and Darilek (1993)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 52 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L26 15 NA 530 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL27 16 NA 530 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL28 17 NA 530 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL29 18 NA 530 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL30 19 NA 697 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL31 20 NA 798 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL32 21 NA 1347 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL33 22 NA 1457 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL34 23 NA 1457 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL35 24 NA 1457 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL36 25 NA 1457 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL37 26 NA 1906 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL38 27 NA 1906 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL39 28 NA 2007 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL40 29 NA 2007 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL41 30 NA 3066 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL42 31 NA 3066 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL43 32 NA 3530 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL44 33 NA 4047 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL45 34 NA 4181 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL46 35 NA 4645 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 53 of 88Site IDL26L27L28L29L30L31L32L33L34L35L36L37L38L39L40L41L42L43L44L45L46HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes2 NA 2 4 NA 75.5 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 41 41 NA 774.2 Laine and Darilek (1993)1 NA 0 1 NA 18.9 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 4 4 NA 75.5 Laine and Darilek (1993)2 NA 2 4 NA 57.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)5 NA 10 15 NA 188 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 3 3 NA 22.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 18 18 NA 123.6 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 0 0 NA 0 Laine and Darilek (1993)4 NA 7 11 NA 75.5 Laine and Darilek (1993)2 NA 12 14 NA 96.1 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 4 4 NA 21 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 22 22 NA 115.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 24 24 NA 119.6 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 4 4 NA 19.9 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 43 43 NA 140.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 9 9 NA 29.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)5 NA 29 34 NA 96.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)2 NA 1 3 NA 7.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 19 19 NA 45.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 18 18 NA 38.8 Laine and Darilek (1993)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 54 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L47 36 NA 4645 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL48 37 NA 4645 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL49 38 NA 6000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL50 39 NA 6039 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL51 40 NA 6039 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL52 41 NA 6039 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL53 42 NA 6039 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL54 43 NA 6070 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL55 44 NA 6070 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL56 45 NA 7432 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL57 46 NA 7479 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL58 47 NA 8094 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL59 48 NA 8919 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL60 49 NA 8919 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL61 50 NA 8919 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL62 51 NA 12141 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL63 52 NA 14864 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL64 53 NA 22297 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL65 54 NA 28328 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL66 55 NA 28328 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL67 56 NA 28328 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 55 of 88Site IDL47L48L49L50L51L52L53L54L55L56L57L58L59L60L61L62L63L64L65L66L67HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes0 NA 3 3 NA 6.5 Laine and Darilek (1993)1 NA 30 31 NA 66.7 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 10 10 NA 16.7 Laine and Darilek (1993)3 NA 62 65 NA 107.6 Laine and Darilek (1993)3 NA 29 32 NA 53 Laine and Darilek (1993)2 NA 5 7 NA 11.6 Laine and Darilek (1993)2 NA 3 5 NA 8.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 2 2 NA 3.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 0 0 NA 0 Laine and Darilek (1993)2 NA 4 6 NA 8.1 Laine and Darilek (1993)7 NA 6 13 NA 17.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)6 NA 0 6 NA 7.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)2 NA 17 19 NA 21.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 25 25 NA 28 Laine and Darilek (1993)3 NA 9 12 NA 13.5 Laine and Darilek (1993)1 NA 3 4 NA 3.3 Laine and Darilek (1993)1 NA 5 6 NA 4 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 61 61 NA 27.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 37 37 NA 13.1 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 40 40 NA 14.1 Laine and Darilek (1993)0 NA 34 34 NA 12 Laine and Darilek (1993)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 56 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L68 57 NA 33751 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL69 58 NA 48562 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL70 - Jul-94 13295UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL71 - Mar-95 1500UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL72 - Jun-95 16100UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL73 - Jul-95 19534UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL74 - Aug-95 4660UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL75 - Aug-95 9280UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL76 - Sep-95 7524UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL77 - Oct-95 500UnitedKingdom NA lagoon HDPE NA NA NA NAL78 - Oct-95 6250UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL79 - Nov-95 22400UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL80 - Nov-95 8400UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL81 - Jan-96 2526UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL82 - Feb-96 1296UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL83 - Feb-96 1346UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL84 - Mar-96 1716UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL85 - Apr-96 1120UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL86 - Apr-96 9416UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL87 - Apr-96 8640UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL88 - May-96 4840UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 57 of 88Site IDL68L69L70L71L72L73L74L75L76L77L78L79L80L81L82L83L84L85L86L87L88HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes9 NA 12 21 NA 6.2 Laine and Darilek (1993)10 NA 31 41 NA 8.4 Laine and Darilek (1993)5 0 1 6 seam to 1000 4.5McQuade and Needham(1999)3 0 0 3 10-20 20McQuade and Needham(1999)0 1 0 1 50x20 0.6McQuade and Needham(1999)12 0 0 12 50-5000 6.1McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 1 1 - 1.3McQuade and Needham(1999)2 0 0 2 5 40McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 2 0 2 200-300 0.9McQuade and Needham(1999)1 1 0 2 100-400 2.4McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)2 0 0 2 200-650 15.4McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)1 1 0 2 10-20 17.9McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)4 2 0 6 1-10 6.9McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 10 2.1McQuade and Needham(1999)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 58 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L89 - May-96 2138UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL90 - May-96 17014UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL91 - Jun-96 1712UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL92 - Jul-96 264UnitedKingdom leachate tank HDPE NA NA NA NAL93 - Jul-96 5675UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL94 - Jul-96 2004UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL95 - Jul-96 6740UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL96 - Jul-96 11586UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL97 - Jul-96 4264UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL98 - Aug-96 9560UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL99 - Sep-96 960UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL100 - Sep-96 1054UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL101 - Sep-96 3006UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL102 - Oct-96 930UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL103 - Oct-96 4980UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL104 - Oct-96 270UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL105 - Nov-96 2900UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL106 - Dec-96 1180UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL107 - Dec-96 3340UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL108 - Dec-96 856UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL109 - Dec-96 2180UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 59 of 88Site IDL89L90L91L92L93L94L95L96L97L98L99L100L101L102L103L104L105L106L107L108L109HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)2 0 1 3 NA 1.8McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 50 5.8McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 50 1.8McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 2 3.3McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 1 1 - 4.6McQuade and Needham(1999)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 60 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L110 - Jan-97 11720UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL111 - Jan-97 1664UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL112 - Jan-97 3830UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL113 - Jan-97 1252UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL114 - Jan-97 7000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL115 - Feb-97 1360UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL116 - Feb-97 401UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL117 - Feb-97 5710UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL118 - Mar-97 1500UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL119 - Mar-97 2380UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL120 - Mar-97 1640UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL121 - Apr-97 2369UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL122 - Apr-97 6777UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL123 - Apr-97 10804UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL124 - May-97 2380UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL125 - Jun-97 1220UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL126 - Jun-97 1178UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL127 - Jul-97 5350UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL128 - Jul-97 1050UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL129 - Jul-97 11790UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL130 - Jul-97 850UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 61 of 88Site IDL110L111L112L113L114L115L116L117L118L119L120L121L122L123L124L125L126L127L128L129L130HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes0 2 1 3 - 2.6McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 500 6McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 20 2.6McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 3 1 4 - 5.7McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)2 0 0 2 50 49.9McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 pinhole 1.8McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 NA 4.2McQuade and Needham(1999)2 0 0 2 NA 3McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 3 3 - 5.6McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)8 1 2 11 pinhole-300 9.3McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 NA 11.8McQuade and Needham(1999)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 62 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L131 - Jul-97 2165UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL132 - Aug-97 318UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL133 - Sep-97 100UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL134 - Sep-97 1572UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL135 - Oct-97 9484UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL136 - Oct-97 13526UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL137 - Oct-97 1500UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL138 - Oct-97 2366UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL139 - Dec-97 776UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL140 - Dec-97 336UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL141 - Dec-97 6396UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL142 - Mar-98 3405UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL143 - Apr-98 880UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL144 - May-98 5608UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL145 - May-98 1030UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL146 - May-98 40500UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL147 - Jun-98 1784UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL148 - Jul-98 15040UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL149 - Jul-98 3869UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL150 - Jul-98 7060UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL151 - Jul-98 14096UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 63 of 88Site IDL131L132L133L134L135L136L137L138L139L140L141L142L143L144L145L146L147L148L149L150L151HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes3 0 0 3 NA 13.9McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 NA 31.4McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)2 1 0 3 pinhole-30 3.2McQuade and Needham(1999)0 1 0 1 30x50 0.7McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)1 1 0 2 5-100 3.1McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)3 1 0 4 2-50 1McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)yes yes 7 13 pinhole-30 8.6McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)4 0 1 5 NA 7.1McQuade and Needham(1999)8 2 0 10 pinhole-50 7.1McQuade and Needham(1999)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 64 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L152 - Aug-98 3742UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL153 - NA 20000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL154 - NA 60000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL155 - NA 2000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL156 - NA 14000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL157 - NA 5000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL158 - NA 4500UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL159 - NA 15000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL160 - NA 10000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL161 - NA 800UnitedKingdomwatercontainment pond HDPE NA NA NA NAL162 - NA 800UnitedKingdomwatercontainment pond HDPE NA NA NA NAL163 - NA 1000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL164 - NA 29400UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL165 - NA 11000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL166 - NA 9000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA noL167 - NA 7000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL168 - NA 20000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL169 - NA 1500UnitedKingdomwatercontainment pond HDPE NA NA NA NAL170 - NA 25400UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL171 - NA 40000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA NAL172 - NA 2000UnitedKingdom NA NA LLDPE NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 65 of 88Site IDL152L153L154L155L156L157L158L159L160L161L162L163L164L165L166L167L168L169L170L171L172HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)10 0 0 10 1-150 5McQuade and Needham(1999)34 1 0 35 1-2000 5.8McQuade and Needham(1999)3 0 0 3 1-150 15McQuade and Needham(1999)3 0 0 3 50-500 2.1McQuade and Needham(1999)3 0 0 3 50-150 6McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 100 2.2McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)4 0 0 4 pinholes 50McQuade and Needham(1999)2 0 0 2 pinholes 25McQuade and Needham(1999)2 0 0 2 100-150 20McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 pinhole 0.3McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)18 0 0 18 pinhole-75 20McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)7 0 0 7 pinhole-100 3.5McQuade and Needham(1999)15 0 0 15 pinholes 100McQuade and Needham(1999)8 0 0 8 pinhole-100 3.1McQuade and Needham(1999)18 0 0 18 pinhole-500 4.5McQuade and Needham(1999)9 0 0 9 10-750 45McQuade and Needham(1999)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 66 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L173 - NA 2000UnitedKingdomwatercontainment pond HDPE NA NA NA NAL174 - NA 2000UnitedKingdom NA NA LLDPE NA NA NA NAL175 - NA 12000UnitedKingdomwatercontainment pond HDPE NA NA NA NAL176 - May-98 13500UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL177 - Sep-96 15000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL178 - Apr-97 7500UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL179 - Sep-98 5000UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL180 - Sep-98 13200UnitedKingdom NA NA HDPE NA NA NA yesL181 A NA 48600 NAwaste watercontainment pond HDPE 1.5 NA NA yesL182 B NA 8000 NA HW landfill HDPE/CCL 2 NA NA yesL183 - 1993 NANorthernIreland NA landfill HDPE/GCL 2 NA NA NAL184 1 NA 89 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL185 2 NA 89 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL186 3 NA 89 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL187 4 NA 93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL188 5 NA 167 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL189 6 NA 244 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL190 7 NA 279 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL191 8 NA 279 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL192 9 NA 297 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL193 10 NA 460 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 67 of 88Site IDL173L174L175L176L177L178L179L180L181L182L183L184L185L186L187L188L189L190L191L192L193HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source Notes24 0 0 24 5-800 120McQuade and Needham(1999)12 0 0 12 pinhole-400 60McQuade and Needham(1999)35 0 0 35 NA 29.2McQuade and Needham(1999)1 0 0 1 NA 0.7McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 1 0 1 - 1.3McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)0 0 00 - 0McQuade and Needham(1999)NA NA NA 21 NA 4.3 Laine (1991)NA NA NA 10 NA 12.5 Laine (1991)1 2 7 10 NA NAMosley and Crozier(1995)NA NA 2 2 NA 225 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 3 3 NA 337 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 3 3 NA 337 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 3 4 NA 431 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 0 0 NA 0 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 6 6 NA 247 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 21 21 NA 754 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 4 4 NA 143 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 0 0 NA 0 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 0 0 NA 0 Laine and Miklas (1989)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 68 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L194 11 NA 460 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL195 12 NA 460 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL196 13 NA 481 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL197 14 NA 651 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL198 15 NA 1170 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL199 16 NA 1704 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL200 17 NA 2417 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL201 18 NA 2417 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL202 19 NA 2536 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL203 20 NA 3000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL204 21 NA 4046 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL205 22 NA 4212 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL206 23 NA 4645 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL207 24 NA 4682 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL208 25 NA 5249 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL209 26 NA 5112 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL210 27 NA 5471 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL211 28 NA 5806 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL212 29 NA 6000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL213 30 NA 6070 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL214 31 NA 6072 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 69 of 88Site IDL194L195L196L197L198L199L200L201L202L203L204L205L206L207L208L209L210L211L212L213L214HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source NotesNA NA 17 17 NA 369 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 2 2 NA 43 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 1 2 NA 42 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 4 4 NA 61 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 7 7 NA 60 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 35 50 NA 293 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 7 7 NA 29 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 4 4 NA 16 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 6 8 NA 31 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 25 25 NA 83 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 2 2 NA 5.4 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 4 4 NA 9.7 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 6 6 NA 13 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 188 193 NA 412 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 18 29 NA 57 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 12 12 NA 24 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 6 8 NA 15 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 19 21 NA 37 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 21 29 NA 48 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 55 56 NA 92 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 6 6 NA 9.7 Laine and Miklas (1989)Table 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 70 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L215 32 NA 6072 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL216 33 NA 6072 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL217 34 NA 6085 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL218 35 NA 6085 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL219 36 NA 6882 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL220 37 NA 7664 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL221 38 NA 8093 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL222 39 NA 8093 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL223 40 NA 9201 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL224 41 NA 12544 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL225 42 NA 14007 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL226 43 NA 14162 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL227 44 NA 14162 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL228 45 NA 14639 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL229 46 NA 15242 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL230 47 NA 33692 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL231 1 NA 894 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL232 2 NA 1165 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL233 3 NA 2229 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL234 4 NA 2255 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL235 5 NA 2322 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 71 of 88Site IDL215L216L217L218L219L220L221L222L223L224L225L226L227L228L229L230L231L232L233L234L235HolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source NotesNA NA 5 7 NA 12 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 3 5 NA 8.6 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 5 7 NA 12 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 3 5 NA 8.6 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 19 20 NA 29 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 15 18 NA 24 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 7 8 NA 9.7 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 17 17 NA 22 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 14 18 NA 19 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 16 17 NA 14 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 46 64 NA 45 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 2 2 NA 1.4 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 7 7 NA 5.4 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 10 12 NA 8.6 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 16 18 NA 12 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 37 51 NA 15 Laine and Miklas (1989)NA NA 14 16 NA 179 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 12 16 NA 138 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 33 40 NA 180 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 46 47 NA 209 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 15 22 NA 95 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeTable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 72 of 88Site IDCell ID fromLiteratureSource1Date Area (m2) Location Waste Type WMU typeType of GMLiner2Thickness ofGM (mm)Quality ofMaterialBeneath GMInstallerExperienceFormal CQAProgram?L236 6 NA 2322 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL237 7 NA 3278 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL238 8 NA 3904 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL239 9 NA 4645 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL240 10 NA 4738 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL241 11 NA 5806 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL242 12 NA 12139 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL243 13 NA 48557 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL244 14 NA 54325 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAL245 - NA 8100 NA NA landfill HDPE 1.5 NA NA NAL246 - NA 1500 NA NA landfill NA NA NA NA NAL247 - NA 1300 NA Industrial landfill HPDE 2 NA NA NANotes:1. The ID used in the literature source to identify the cell.2. HDPE = high density polyethylene; PBGM = pre-fabricated bituminous geomembrane; PP = polypropylene; LLDPE = linear low density polyethylene; CCL = compacted clay linerNA = not available- = not applicableTable 3.1-9. Leak Density Data for Geomembrane Liners.page 73 of 88Site IDL236L237L238L239L240L241L242L243L244L245L246L247Notes:1. The ID use2. HDPE = higNA = not avail- = not applicaHolesKnifeCuts/TearsSeam orWeldDefects Total LeaksRange of HoleSize (mm)Leak Density(leaks/ha) Source NotesNA NA 10 15 NA 65 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 33 42 NA 128 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 12 14 NA 36 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 3 4 NA 8.6 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 19 20 NA 42 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 44 50 NA 86 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 183 192 NA 158 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 31 41 NA 8.6 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslopeNA NA 61 79 NA 15 Laine and Miklas (1989)Includes bottom area and sideslope1 NA NA 3 0.25 cm 3.7 Laine and Darilek (1993) Covered with 60 cm soil cover0 1 2 3 40 mm tear 20 Darilek et al. (1989) Covered with 250 mm soil cover0 0 1 1 30 cm 7.7 Peggs (1993)r; GCL = geosynthetic clay linerTable 3.3-1. Infiltration Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 74 of 88Site IDSite ID inTable 3.3-2 DescriptionAverageInfiltrationRate (cm/s)Period ofMeasurement WMUTypeIn-Serviceor Test PadMeasurementMethod1Size of TestApparatus LocationConstructionDateC1 HC3 Keele Valley 4.52E-08 6 years Landfill In-Service Lysimeter 15 m x 15 m Ontario, Canada NAC2HC9Sauk County 1.11E-08 5 years Landfill In-Service Lysimeter NAWisconsin NAC3HC10Portage County 1.63E-0913 years Landfill In-Service Lysimeter NAWisconsin NAC4 HC142 Central Texas 1.29E-07 90 days PondIn-Service WaterBalance NATexas 1980C5 HC143 North Texas 3.08E-07 8 years PondIn-Service WaterBalance NATexas 1970C6 HC150 Experimental earthen liner 1.50E-0746 days -Test PadSDRI2.1 m diameter Illinois NAC7 HC151 Test Pad 1 9.00E-07 40 days- Test PadSDRI NA NA NAC8 HC153 Field-scale facility 1.20E-06 48 days -Test PadSDRI NA NA 1985C9 - Earthen liner experiment 6.40E-08 2 years -Test Pad Water Balance NA Illinois 1988Notes:1. SDRI = sealed double-ring infiltrometer2. Percent passing the no. 200 sieve3. Modified Proctor (MP), Standard Proctor (SP) or Reduced Proctor (RP)4. Percent of (w, gd) points lying on or above the line of optimumsNA = not available- = not applicableTable 3.3-1. Infiltration Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 75 of 88Site IDC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9LinerMaterialArea of Cell(m x m)LinerThickness(m)LiquidLimit (%)PlasticityIndex (%)PercentFines2Clay Fraction(% <2μm, fornatural liners)PercentBentoniteOptimumWaterContent, wopt(%)Maximum DryUnit Weight,γd,max(kN/m3)CompactiveEffort3Soil 30 x 30 1.2 25 10 85 22 - 12.3 19 SPSoil NA 1.5 55 31 NA 45 - 12.7 18.6 MPSoil NA 1.5 43 21 NA 29 - 16.6 18.7 MPSoil 90 x 90 0.3 39 19 NA NA - 20 15.9 SPSoil/Bentonite 318 x 318 NA NA NANA NA NA 13 17.0 SPSoil 3 x 9 0.9 21.1 7 NA NA - 10.4 20.4 SPSoil NA 0.6 NA 20 NA NA - 12.5 NA NASoil 9.1 x 22.9 0.3 35 12 86 48 - 18 17.3 SPSoil 10 x 17 1 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NALiner CharacteristicsTable 3.3-1. Infiltration Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 76 of 88Site IDC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9CompactorMass (kg)Passes perLiftLiftThickness(mm)Number ofLiftsFormal CQAProgram?WaterContent, w(%)Dry Density,γd(kN/m3)Po4(%)Frequency ofMoisture DensityTests (no./sq. ft.)Time lapsebetweencompletion of linerand filling withwater/waste Source30,000 4 150 8 Yes 13.8 19.4 98 NA NA King et al. (1993)NA NA 150 10 Yes 19.6 17.0 90 NA NA Gordon et al. (1989)NA NA 150 10 Yes 17.8 16.9 50 NA NA Huebner and Gordon (1995)NA NA NA 2 No 18 16.5 NA NA Several days Daniel (1984)NA NA NA NA No NA NA NA NA NA Daniel (1984)NA NA 230 6 NA 10.4 NA NA NA NA Albrecht and Cartwright (1989)NA NA 150 4 NA 12.5 NA NA NA NA Trautwein and Williams (1990)5,000 NA 150 3 Yes NA NA NA 1 per 63 sq. ft. NA Rogowski (1985)20,000 NA 230 7 NA 11.4 18.0 NA 1 per 230 sq. ft. NA Cartwright and Krapac (1990)QA/QC DataConstruction InformationTable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 77 of 88Site ID DescriptionHydraulicConductivity(cm/s)WMUTypeIn-Service orTest PadMeasurementMethod1Size of TestApparatus (m xm or m2) LocationConstructionDateMonitoringPeriod (yrs)HC1 NCL1 2.8E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 1.44IllinoisNA NAHC2 NCL2 1.5E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 1.82NANA NAHC3 NCL3 9.0E-09 LandfillIn-Service Lysimeter15 x 15Ontario, Canada1983 6HC4 NCL4 1.1E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33LouisianaNA NAHC5 NCL5 9.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 1.49NANA NAHC6 NCL6 2.7E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC7 NCL7 5.8E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33 Pennsylvania NA NAHC8 NCL8 1.2E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC9 NCL9 7.0E-09 Landfill In-Service Lysimeter NAWisconsin1982 5HC10 NCL10 3.0E-08 Landfill In-Service Lysimeter NAWisconsin1982 5HC11 NCL11 3.0E-09 Landfill In-Service Lysimeter NAWisconsin1980 6HC12 NCL12 2.0E-09 Landfill In-Service Lysimeter NAWisconsin1980 6HC13 NCL13 1.3E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33 Pennsylvania NA NAHC14 NCL14 2.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC15 NCL15 3.3E-09 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC16 NCL16 3.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC17 NCL17 6.0E-09 Landfill In-Service Lysimeter 0.37LouisianaNA NAHC18 NCL18 9.8E-09 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33LouisianaNA NAHC19 NCL19 4.4E-08 Landfill In-Service Lysimeter 8 x 8NANA NAHC20 NCL20 8.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC21 NCL21 2.5E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC22 NCL22 2.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC23 NCL23 1.4E-08 Landfill In-Service Lysimeter NAWisconsinNA NAHC24 NCL24 1.5E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC25 NCL25 8.0E-09 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC26 NCL26 2.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC27 NCL27 1.8E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC28 NCL28 9.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC29 NCL29 1.7E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 1.85MichiganNA NAHC30 NCL30 1.1E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC31 NCL31 6.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC32 NCL32 3.9E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC33 NCL33 3.9E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC34 NCL34 4.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC35 NCL35 3.7E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC36 NCL36 3.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC37 NCL37 1.3E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33IndianaNA NAHC38 NCL38 3.6E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 0.16IllinoisNA NAHC39 NCL39 3.5E-09 - Test Pad SDRI 1.76IllinoisNA NAHC40 NCL40 2.2E-08 - Test Pad SDRI NANANA NAHC41 NCL41 1.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC42 NCL42 8.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NATable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 78 of 88Site IDHC1HC2HC3HC4HC5HC6HC7HC8HC9HC10HC11HC12HC13HC14HC15HC16HC17HC18HC19HC20HC21HC22HC23HC24HC25HC26HC27HC28HC29HC30HC31HC32HC33HC34HC35HC36HC37HC38HC39HC40HC41HC42Liner MaterialArea of Cell(m x m orm2)LinerThickness(m)LiquidLimit (%)PlasticityIndex (%)PercentFines2ClayFraction (%<2μm, fornaturalliners)PercentBentoniteOptimumWaterContent,wopt(%)MaximumDry UnitWeight,γd,max(kN/m3)CompactiveEffort3Soil36 x 150.90 24 10 65 37 - 10.2 20.1 SPSoil32 x 14NA 58 29 NA NA - NA NA NASoil30 x 301.20 25 10 85 22 - 12.3 19 SPSoil15 x 300.60 50 34 95 47 - 17.9 16.8 SPSoilNA1.50 43 26 87 32 - 14.3 18.6 MPSoil29 x 120.90 32 19 88 35 - 13.5 19.5 MPSoil15 x 241.20 33 13 77 27 - 14.1 18.6 SPSoil24 x 180.90 35 22 75 45 - 14.5 18.8 MPSoilNA1.50 55 31 NA 45 - 12.7 18.6 MPSoilNA1.50 43 21 NA 29 - 16.6 18.7 MPSoilNA1.50 57 30 NA 39 - 21.7 17.3 MPSoilNA1.50 55 28 NA 33 - 23 16.6 MPSoil15 x 241.20 37 15 78 37 - 18 17 SPSoil9 x 141.02 40 20 70 25 - 16.2 16.7 SPSoil12 x 261.40 85 58 99 57 - 25.8 14.6 SPSoil9 x 90.85 41 22 77 38 - 15.8 17 SPSoil15 x 300.60 50 34 95 47 - 20.3 16.4 SPSoil30 x 120.75 30 18 52 16 - 13 18.7 SPSoilNA1.50 32 14 85 44 - 10.5 20.1 MPSoil45 x 200.90 49 23 94 43 - 18.5 17.2 SPSoil58 x 260.90 51 26 90 36 - 18 17 SPSoilNANA 63 42 96 NA - 20.5 16.3 SPSoilNA1.50 39 18 73 30 - 20 16.5 SPSoil31 x 150.75 67 46 94 53 - 21.5 16.3 SPSoil31 x 150.75 53 41 88 36 - 16.1 18 SPSoil27 x 170.90 33 19 85 37 - 17.5 17.7 SPSoil27 x 170.90 31 18 74 26 - 16.5 17.8 SPSoil27 x 170.90 35 19 89 41 - 16.6 17.5 SPSoil32 x 161.53 27 10 76 28 - 13 19.1 SPSoilNA0.90 32 19 NA NA - 14 18.6 MPSoil13 x 260.60 40 24 58 23 - 12.4 19.3 SPSoil15 x 401.20 45 27 99 42 - 11 19.9 MPSoil15 x 301.20 29 15 87 40 - 13.3 18.9 MPSoilNA0.45 44 16 96 NA - 17.3 17.1 SPSoilNA0.90 39 19 97 NA - 22.2 16.4 SPSoil15 x 300.90 36 17 74 30 - 13.2 18.3 SPSoilNA0.75 36 17 48 16 - 12.4 19 SPSoil3 x 90.90 21 7 60 NA - 10.3 20.4 SPSoil14.6 x 7.30.78 21 7 60 NA - 10.3 20.4 SPSoil8 x 260.90 101 71 98 49 - 31.6 13.4 SPSoil930.60 47 30 66 NA - 19.5 16.3 SPSoil30 x 150.60 69 45 79 49 - 23.4 15.1 SPLiner CharacteristicsTable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 79 of 88Site IDHC1HC2HC3HC4HC5HC6HC7HC8HC9HC10HC11HC12HC13HC14HC15HC16HC17HC18HC19HC20HC21HC22HC23HC24HC25HC26HC27HC28HC29HC30HC31HC32HC33HC34HC35HC36HC37HC38HC39HC40HC41HC42CompactorMass (kg)Passes perLiftLiftThickness(mm)Number ofLiftsFormal CQAProgram?WaterContent, w(%)Dry Density,γd(kN/m3)Po4(%)Frequency ofMoistureDensity Tests(no./sq. ft.)Time LapseBetweenCompletion ofLiner and FillingwithWater/WasteLaboratoryHydraulicConductivity5(cm/s) Source of Data32,400 6 150 6 Yes 10.3 19.8 44 NA NA 3.2E-09 EPA (1998)NA NA NA NA Yes NA NA NA NA NA NA EPA (1998)30,000 4 150 8 Yes 13.8 19.4 98 NA NA 8.0E-09 EPA (1998)19,800 NA 150 4 Yes 21.3 16 80 NA NA 5.0E-09 EPA (1998)36,000 6 150 10 Yes 17.3 17.3 95 NA NA 8.8E-09 EPA (1998)32,400 5 150 6 Yes 13.8 19 32 NA NA 2.4E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 4 150 8 Yes 17.2 17.7 88 NA NA 8.4E-08 EPA (1998)12,600 4 150 6 Yes 15.3 17.7 8 NA NA 9.0E-09 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 10 Yes 19.6 17 90 NA NA 1.0E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 10 Yes 17.8 16.9 50 NA NA 8.0E-09 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 10 Yes 25.4 16 75 NA NA 2.0E-09 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 10 Yes 26 16.1 78 NA NA 3.0E-09 EPA (1998)32,400 4 150 8 Yes 20.7 16.7 100 NA NA 1.3E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA 170 6 Yes 17 16.8 78 NA NA 4.8E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA 200 7 Yes 30.8 14.1 98 NA NA 4.4E-09 EPA (1998)39,000 NA 170 5 Yes 19.8 16.1 91 NA NA 3.7E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 6 150 4 Yes 23.3 15.7 100 NA NA 3.0E-09 EPA (1998)25,000 4 150 5 Yes 16.6 17.4 85 NA NA 1.5E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 5 150 10 Yes 13.6 19 81 NA NA 1.9E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 8 150 6 Yes 17.6 16.9 8 NA NA 3.0E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 6 150 6 Yes 19.5 16.9 80 NA NA 3.1E-07 EPA (1998)NA NA NA NA Yes NA NA NA NA NA 2.4E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 10 Yes 22 16.4 89 NA NA 1.5E-08 EPA (1998)18,900 NA 150 5 Yes 23.6 15.8 81 NA NA 9.0E-09 EPA (1998)18,900 NA 150 5 Yes 18.9 16.9 71 NA NA 2.3E-09 EPA (1998)18,900 NA 150 6 Yes 15.5 17.6 17 NA NA 2.9E-09 EPA (1998)18,900 NA 150 6 Yes 13.5 18 6 NA NA 3.0E-08 EPA (1998)18,900 NA 150 6 Yes 16.2 17.7 57 NA NA 1.9E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 6 170 9 Yes 13.9 18.8 84 NA NA 2.2E-08 EPA (1998)27,000 NA 150 6 Yes 16.2 18.6 65 NA NA 3.0E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA 300 2 Yes 13.1 19.1 75 NA NA 1.6E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 NA 150 8 Yes 13.9 19.2 92 NA NA 3.0E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 NA 150 8 Yes 13.4 18.7 80 NA NA 1.3E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 4 150 3 Yes 17.8 17.1 45 NA NA 1.5E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 6 150 6 Yes 20.7 16.8 78 NA NA 3.0E-08 EPA (1998)17,100 8 150 6 Yes 15.5 17.6 77 NA NA 9.1E-09 EPA (1998)NA 4 150 5 Yes 14.1 18.2 45 NA NA 4.9E-08 EPA (1998)NA 12 150 6 Yes 11.5 20.4 NA NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 12 130 6 Yes 11.6 17.9 10 NA NA 2.6E-08 EPA (1998)59 kg/lin.cm NA150 6Yes35.5 12.8 100NA NA3.5E-09EPA (1998)19,800 40 150 4 Yes 21.9 16 92 NA NA 5.5E-09 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 4 Yes 25 15.1 81 NA NA NA EPA (1998)Quality Assurance/Quality Control DataConstruction InformationTable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 80 of 88Site ID DescriptionHydraulicConductivity(cm/s)WMUTypeIn-Service orTest PadMeasurementMethod1Size of TestApparatus (m xm or m2) LocationConstructionDateMonitoringPeriod (yrs)HC43 NCL43 7.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC44 NCL44 2.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC45 NCL45 3.7E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC46 NCL46 2.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC47 NCL47 5.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC48 NCL48 4.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC49 NCL49 5.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC50 NCL50 2.6E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC51 NCL51 3.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC52 NCL52 1.1E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 7.2AlabamaNA NAHC53 NCL53 2.2E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC54 NCL54 7.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33MarylandNA NAHC55 NCL55 1.3E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC56 NCL56 2.4E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC57 NCL57 5.6E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC58 NCL58 5.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC59 NCL59 9.4E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC60 NCL60 1.2E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC61 NCL61 3.7E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC62 NCL62 3.1E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC63 NCL63 3.9E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33GeorgiaNA NAHC64 NCL64 2.3E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC65 NCL65 1.8E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC66 NCL66 1.2E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC67 NCL67 8.3E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC68 NCL68 2.3E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC69 NCL69 1.3E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC70 NCL70 4.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC71 NCL71 8.3E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC72 NCL72 2.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33South DakotaNA NAHC73 NCL73 8.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC74 NCL74 1.0E-09 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC75 NCL75 5.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33PennsylvaniaNA NAHC76 NCL76 2.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33NANA NAHC77 NCL77 2.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33PennsylvaniaNA NAHC78 NCL78 2.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33PennsylvaniaNA NAHC79 NCL79 4.5E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC80 NCL80 4.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33TexasNA NAHC81 NCL81 1.5E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33New YorkNA NAHC82 NCL82 3.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33PennsylvaniaNA NAHC83 NCL83 4.5E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33PennsylvaniaNA NAHC84 NCL84 1.3E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33CaliforniaNA NATable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 81 of 88Site IDHC43HC44HC45HC46HC47HC48HC49HC50HC51HC52HC53HC54HC55HC56HC57HC58HC59HC60HC61HC62HC63HC64HC65HC66HC67HC68HC69HC70HC71HC72HC73HC74HC75HC76HC77HC78HC79HC80HC81HC82HC83HC84Liner MaterialArea of Cell(m x m orm2)LinerThickness(m)LiquidLimit (%)PlasticityIndex (%)PercentFines2ClayFraction (%<2μm, fornaturalliners)PercentBentoniteOptimumWaterContent,wopt(%)MaximumDry UnitWeight,γd,max(kN/m3)CompactiveEffort3Liner CharacteristicsSoil37 x 90.75 62 42 86 NA - 22.4 15.4 SPSoil37 x 90.75 62 42 86 NA - 22.4 15.4 SPSoil2880.60 44 28 70 NA - 19.5 16.4 SPSoil15 x 301.13 35 16 98 22 - 23.3 15.4 SPSoil46 x 240.85 39 24 69 NA - 14.6 17.7 SPSoil46 x 150.60 41 23 86 NA - 18 16.7 SPSoil46 x 150.60 42 22 86 NA - 18 16.7 SPSoil46 x 150.60 43 24 86 NA - 18 16.7 SPSoil46 x 150.60 40 22 86 NA - 18 16.7 SPSoil150NA 37 18 73 38 - 19.9 16.5 SPSoilNANA 54 31 NA 40 - 19.9 16.4 SPSoilNA0.60 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NASoil4830.64 66 35 93 NA - 27.4 14.8 SPSoil4830.52 66 35 93 NA - 27.4 14.5 MPSoil4830.56 69 38 98 NA - 26.8 14.6 SPSoil4830.60 69 38 98 NA - 26.8 14.6 SPSoil4830.68 69 38 98 NA - 26.8 14.6 SPSoil4830.68 68 35 95 NA - 26.6 14.6 SPSoil4830.76 68 35 95 NA - 26.6 14.6 SPSoil4830.60 51 20 73 NA - 20.2 15.9 SPSoil4830.92 51 20 73 NA - 20.2 15.9 SPSoil930.60 47 30 66 NA - 19.5 16.3 SPSoil1860.60 47 31 66 NA - 13.5 19.2 MPSoil12 x 261.0 50 29 75 NA - 19 16.1 SPSoil12 x 261.1 49 27 62 NA - 19.3 16.1 SPSoil15 x 360.6 35 17 67 22 - 14.8 17.7 SPSoil15 x 360.6 22 9 50 16 - 10 19.9 SPSoil24 x 180.9 42 26 88 45 - 14.9 18.7 MPSoil24 x 180.9 29 19 83 34 - 12.2 19.6 MPSoil18 x 360.6 36 20 85 35 - 18 16.5 SPSoil12 x 230.7 76 53 NA NA - 21 15.5 SPSoil12 x 230.7 56 40 64 NA - 18 16.9 SPSoil15 x 300.6 NA NA NA NA - 21 15.6 SPSoil18 x 300.6 37 17 92 NA - 19.2 16.6 SPSoil15 x 300.9 32 13 NA 19 - 9.9 19.7 SPSoil15 x 300.9 32 16 NA 25 - 11.5 19.6 SPSoil4651.2 62 41 82 NA - 25 14.9 SPSoil4651.2 52 35 84 NA - 19.6 15.9 SPSoil4650.6 47 22 NA NA - 25 15.3 SPSoil2230.6 NA NA 84 54 - NA NA NASoil2230.6 39 16 81 48 - 18.2 17.6 SPSoilNA4.0 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NATable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 82 of 88Site IDHC43HC44HC45HC46HC47HC48HC49HC50HC51HC52HC53HC54HC55HC56HC57HC58HC59HC60HC61HC62HC63HC64HC65HC66HC67HC68HC69HC70HC71HC72HC73HC74HC75HC76HC77HC78HC79HC80HC81HC82HC83HC84CompactorMass (kg)Passes perLiftLiftThickness(mm)Number ofLiftsFormal CQAProgram?WaterContent, w(%)Dry Density,γd(kN/m3)Po4(%)Frequency ofMoistureDensity Tests(no./sq. ft.)Time LapseBetweenCompletion ofLiner and FillingwithWater/WasteLaboratoryHydraulicConductivity5(cm/s) Source of DataQuality Assurance/Quality Control DataConstruction Information7,200 16 150 5 Yes 23.4 15.4 63 NA NA 2.4E-09 EPA (1998)7,200 8 150 5 Yes 24.2 15 47 NA NA 2.4E-09 EPA (1998)19,800 42 150 4 Yes 19.8 16.3 71 NA NA 5.8E-09 EPA (1998)10,900 8 225 5 Yes 27.3 15.4 100 NA NA 1.5E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 NA 85 10 Yes 16.5 17.7 100 NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 NA 150 4 Yes 17.8 17 75 NA NA 1.1E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 3 150 4 Yes 18.9 16.7 86 NA NA 5.1E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 3 150 4 Yes 18.6 16.9 84 NA NA 7.4E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 NA 150 4 Yes 17.8 17 73 NA NA 4.1E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA NA NA Yes 21.2 16.1 67 NA NA NA EPA (1998)NA 4 NA 4 Yes 21.6 15.5 NA NA NA 1.7E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA 150 4 Yes NA NA NA NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 12 160 4 Yes 27 15 100 NA NA 8.1E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 10 130 4 Yes 30.6 14.2 100 NA NA 2.8E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 6 140 4 Yes 29.6 14 100 NA NA 3.4E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 12 150 4 Yes 30.7 14.3 100 NA NA 2.5E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 12 170 4 Yes 29.4 14.4 100 NA NA 2.7E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 12 170 4 Yes 26.8 15.1 100 NA NA 3.4E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 12 190 4 Yes 29.8 14.4 100 NA NA 4.3E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 12 150 4 Yes 24.6 15.4 100 NA NA 1.6E-07 EPA (1998)19,800 12 230 4 Yes 22.7 15.4 100 NA NA 1.7E-07 EPA (1998)19,800 40 150 4 Yes 21.6 16 88 NA NA 5.5E-09 EPA (1998)19,800 80 150 4 Yes 17.2 17.4 0 NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 2 100 10 Yes 21.7 17.2 95 NA NA 3.7E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 2 100 11 Yes 21.4 17.2 98 NA NA 3.0E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 6 150 4 Yes 17.6 18 100 NA NA 7.8E-09 EPA (1998)19,800 6 150 4 Yes 11.5 19.4 75 NA NA 2.1E-08 EPA (1998)NA 7 150 6 Yes 20.6 16.1 60 NA NA 2.0E-08 EPA (1998)NA 7 150 6 Yes 14.3 18 64 NA NA 2.0E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 8 150 4 Yes 23.7 15.5 100 NA NA 1.4E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 22 100 7 Yes 25.2 14.8 97 NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 22 100 7 Yes 19.6 16.1 47 NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 NA 150 4 Yes 25.4 15.2 100 NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 6 150 4 Yes 21.8 15.9 86 NA NA 4.7E-08 EPA (1998)10,200 10 100 9 Yes 11 19.2 37 NA NA NA EPA (1998)10,200 4 100 9 Yes 12.4 18.8 2 NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 8 150 8 Yes 28.2 16.2 NA NA NA 3.3E-09 EPA (1998)19,800 8 150 8 Yes 23.1 14.9 NA NA NA 1.8E-09 EPA (1998)16,200 4 150 4 Yes 28 14.2 NA NA NA 4.2E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 62 150 4 Yes 17.8 17.1 NA NA NA 1.5E-08 EPA (1998)32,400 62 150 4 Yes 19.3 17.3 NA NA NA 1.7E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 NA 200 20 Yes NA NA NA NA NA NA EPA (1998)Table 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 83 of 88Site ID DescriptionHydraulicConductivity(cm/s)WMUTypeIn-Service orTest PadMeasurementMethod1Size of TestApparatus (m xm or m2) LocationConstructionDateMonitoringPeriod (yrs)HC85 NCL85 2.8E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.33CaliforniaNA NAHC86 NCL86 1.5E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.25OhioNA NAHC87 NCL87 1.4E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.25OhioNA NAHC88 NCL88 2.3E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.25OhioNA NAHC89 NCL89 2.1E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.25OhioNA NAHC90SBL2 3.0E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 NebraskaNA NAHC91SBL3 1.0E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 NebraskaNA NAHC92SBL4 3.0E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 NebraskaNA NAHC93SBL5 2.0E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 NebraskaNA NAHC94SBL6 1.6E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 CaliforniaNA NAHC95SBL7 6.2E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 CaliforniaNA NAHC96SBL8 2.2E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 TexasNA NAHC97SBL9 1.0E-07- Test Pad SDRI2.33 TexasNA NAHC98SBL10 3.0E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 CaliforniaNA NAHC99SBL11 2.0E-09- Test Pad SDRI2.33 South DakotaNA NAHC100SBL12 2.0E-08- Test Pad SDRI2.33 ArizonaNA NAHC101 Liner 7(Test pad) 5.0E-07 - Test PadUnderdrain6NA NA NA NAHC102 Liner 8 (Cover) 8.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA NA NA NAHC103 Liner 9 (Confidential) 2.0E-06 NA NA Leak rate - NA NA NAHC104 Liner 11 (Site K) 1.0E-07 NANA Lysimeter NANA NA NAHC105 Liner 22(Test pad) 6.0E-09 - Test PadUnderdrain6NA NA NA NAHC106 Liner 28 (Celanese pad) 4.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC107 Liner 29 (Transwestern pad) 1.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC108 Liner 30 (Phillips pad 1) 2.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC109 Liner 31 (Phillips pad 2) 1.0E-07 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC110 Liner 32 (UC-onsite clay) 5.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC111 Liner 33 (UC-offsite clay) 2.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC112 Liner 34 (Dupont-gray clay) 3.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC113 Liner 35 (Dupont-tan clay) 3.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC114 Liner 36 (Shell pad) 3.0E-08 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC115 Liner 37 (BP pad) 1.0E-07 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC116 Liner 38 (Gulf Coast Authority) 1.0E-07 NA NA SDRI NA Texas NA NAHC117 Liner 39(Test pad) 4.0E-08 - Test PadInfiltrometer NA NA NA NAHC118 Liner 41 (Residual soil) 2.0E-07 NA NA Infiltrometer NA NA NA NAHC119 Liner 48 (Site A) 2.0E-07 NA NA SDRI NA NA NA NAHC120 Liner 49(Test pad A) 1.5E-07 - TestPad Infiltrometer NANA NA NAHC121 Liner 50(Test pad B) 1.5E-08 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC122 Liner 51(Test pad C) 6.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC123 Liner 52 (1978 cell) 1.0E-09 NANA Lysimeter NANA NA NAHC124 Liner 53 (1984 cell) 1.0E-07 NANA Lysimeter NANA NA NAHC125Soil A5.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC126Soil B2.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NATable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 84 of 88Site IDHC85HC86HC87HC88HC89HC90HC91HC92HC93HC94HC95HC96HC97HC98HC99HC100HC101HC102HC103HC104HC105HC106HC107HC108HC109HC110HC111HC112HC113HC114HC115HC116HC117HC118HC119HC120HC121HC122HC123HC124HC125HC126Liner MaterialArea of Cell(m x m orm2)LinerThickness(m)LiquidLimit (%)PlasticityIndex (%)PercentFines2ClayFraction (%<2μm, fornaturalliners)PercentBentoniteOptimumWaterContent,wopt(%)MaximumDry UnitWeight,γd,max(kN/m3)CompactiveEffort3Liner CharacteristicsSoilNA4.0 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NASoil13 x 150.9 43 24 84 37 - 17.7 17.1 SPSoil13 x 150.9 43 24 84 37 - 17.7 17.1 SPSoil13 x 150.9 25 14 70 29 - 11.6 19.1 SPSoil13 x 150.9 25 14 70 29 - 11.6 19.1 SPSoil/Bentonite31 x 110.9051 36 32NA9.015.0 17.1 SPSoil/Bentonite31 x 110.9051 36 32NA9.015.0 17.1 SPSoil/Bentonite31 x 110.9051 36 32NA9.015.0 17.1 SPSoil/Bentonite31 x 110.9051 36 32NA9.015.0 17.1 SPSoil/Bentonite43 x 151.05NA 29 81NANA23.8 15.4 SPSoil/Bentonite43 x 151.05NA 29 81NANA23.8 15.4 SPSoil/Bentonite13 x 280.9056 31 55NA7.818.6 16.9 SPSoil/Bentonite13 x 280.9065 39 63NA10.520.1 16.5 SPSoil/Bentonite15 x 150.9051 36 21NA10.09.0 19.9 MPSoil/Bentonite11 x 110.45 - 0.69NA NA NANA14.717.7 16.8 SPSoil/Bentonite36 x 180.9060 38 39NA4.013.5 18.5 SPSoil NA 0.3 NA 12 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.9 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.3 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.3 NA 49-69 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.6 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.6 NA 45-68 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.9 NA 11-20 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.9 NA 9-38 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.9 NA 9-38 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.6 NA 45-58 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.6 NA 36-47 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 1.05 NA 25-44 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 1.05 NA 34-36 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.75 NA 15-37 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.6 NA 19-32 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.6 NA 28-52 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.9 NA 10 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.6 NA 11-14 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.75 NA 10 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 1.1 NA 25 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 0.9 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 1.05 NA NA NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 1.2 NA 23 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA 1.2 NA 21 NA NA - NA NA NASoil NA NA 70 38 94 65 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 49 26 94 40 - NA NA NATable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 85 of 88Site IDHC85HC86HC87HC88HC89HC90HC91HC92HC93HC94HC95HC96HC97HC98HC99HC100HC101HC102HC103HC104HC105HC106HC107HC108HC109HC110HC111HC112HC113HC114HC115HC116HC117HC118HC119HC120HC121HC122HC123HC124HC125HC126CompactorMass (kg)Passes perLiftLiftThickness(mm)Number ofLiftsFormal CQAProgram?WaterContent, w(%)Dry Density,γd(kN/m3)Po4(%)Frequency ofMoistureDensity Tests(no./sq. ft.)Time LapseBetweenCompletion ofLiner and FillingwithWater/WasteLaboratoryHydraulicConductivity5(cm/s) Source of DataQuality Assurance/Quality Control DataConstruction Information19,800 NA 200 20 Yes NA NA NA NA NA NA EPA (1998)19,800 4 150 6 Yes 20.5 16.6 100 NA NA 2.2E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 7 150 6 Yes 20.4 16.6 95 NA NA 2.6E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 4 150 6 Yes 13.2 19.2 100 NA NA 3.9E-08 EPA (1998)19,800 6 150 6 Yes 13.2 19.1 100 NA NA 3.1E-08 EPA (1998)20,000 6 150 6Yes14.7 17.2NA NA NA 3.0E-08 EPA (1998)20,000 6 150 6Yes16.0 16.7NA NA NA 1.9E-08 EPA (1998)20,000 4 150 6Yes14.3 16.8NA NA NA 6.0E-08 EPA (1998)20,000 4 150 6Yes15.2 16.5NA NA NA 7.5E-08 EPA (1998)20,000 2 150 7Yes28.4 14.8 54NA NA 6.9E-09 EPA (1998)20,000 2 150 7Yes28.4 14.8 54NA NA 6.9E-09 EPA (1998)12,600 6 150 6Yes20.2 15.9NA NA NA NA EPA (1998)20,000 6 150 6Yes21.4 15.9NA NA NA NA EPA (1998)32,400 4 150 6Yes12.5 19.1 100NA NA 2.6E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA150 - 230 3Yes18.5 16.8 75NA NA NA EPA (1998)NA4 150 6Yes15.5 17.9NA NA NA 3.2E-08 EPA (1998)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Benson and Daniel (1994)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 60 NA NA 2.5E-08 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 80 NA NA 3.2E-07 Trast and Benson (1995)Table 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 86 of 88Site ID DescriptionHydraulicConductivity(cm/s)WMUTypeIn-Service orTest PadMeasurementMethod1Size of TestApparatus (m xm or m2) LocationConstructionDateMonitoringPeriod (yrs)HC127Soil C1.5E-08 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC128Soil D1.5E-07 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC129Soil E9.0E-09 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC130Soil F8.0E-09 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC131Soil G9.0E-09 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC132Soil H7.0E-08 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC133Soil I1.5E-07 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC134Soil J1.5E-07 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC135Soil K2.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC136 SDRI 3.0E-05 - Test Pad SDRI 1.5 x 1.5 NA NA NAHC137 Lysimeter 1.0E-04 - Test Pad Lysimeter4.9 x 4.9 NA NA NAHC138 Soil A 2.0E-08 - TestPad SDRI NA Colorado NA NAHC139 Soil B 8.0E-07 - TestPad SDRI NA Colorado NA NAHC140 Clay 1 9.0E-06 - Test PadWater Balance - Texas 1983 NAHC141 Clay 2 4.0E-06 - Test PadWater Balance - Texas 1983 NAHC142 Central Texas 3.2E-05 PondIn-Service Water Balance - Texas 1980 0.25HC143 North Texas 3.0E-06 PondIn-Service Water Balance - Texas 1970 8HC144 South Texas 1.5E-05 PondIn-Service Water Balance - Texas 1974 0.5HC145 Cooling pond in Mexico 2.0E-07 - Test Pad SDRI 2 x 2 Mexico NA NAHC146 Experimental earthen liner 3.6E-08 - Test Pad SDRI 2.1 m diameter Illinois NA NAHC147 Test Pad 1 6.0E-07 - TestPad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC148 Test Pad 2 5.0E-06 - TestPad SDRI NA NA NA NAHC149 Field-scale facility 1.6E-05 - Test Pad SDRI NA NA 1985 NANotes:1. SDRI = sealed double-ring infiltrometer2. Percent passing the no. 200 sieve3. Modified Proctor (MP), Standard Proctor (SP) or Reduced Proctor (RP)4. Percent of (w,γd) points lying on or above the line of optimums.5. Geometric mean reported here if multiple values were available.6. Underdrain and lysimeter reported separately in this document, with no explanation as to the difference between them.NA = not available- = not applicableTable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 87 of 88Site IDHC127HC128HC129HC130HC131HC132HC133HC134HC135HC136HC137HC138HC139HC140HC141HC142HC143HC144HC145HC146HC147HC148HC149Liner MaterialArea of Cell(m x m orm2)LinerThickness(m)LiquidLimit (%)PlasticityIndex (%)PercentFines2ClayFraction (%<2μm, fornaturalliners)PercentBentoniteOptimumWaterContent,wopt(%)MaximumDry UnitWeight,γd,max(kN/m3)CompactiveEffort3Liner CharacteristicsSoil NA NA 27 15 76 28 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 35 19 89 41 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 53 41 88 36 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 67 46 94 53 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 29 16 52 16 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 37 20 81 25 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 33 19 85 37 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 31 18 74 26 - NA NA NASoil NA NA 24 11 62 20 - NA NA NASoil 8.5 x 10.7 0.30 56 15 82 42 - 15.9 NA SPSoil 8.5 x 10.7 0.30 56 15 82 42 - 16.5 NA SPSoil 4.6 x 15.2 0.75 59 35 NA 50 - NA NA NASoil 4.6 x 15.2 0.75 41 22 NA 35 - NA NA NASoil 6.1 x 15.2 0.15 30 11 80 NA - NA NA NASoil 6.1 x 15.2 0.15 72 45 50 NA - NA NA NASoil 90 x 90 0.30 39 19 NA NA - 20 15.9 SPSoil/Bentonite 318 x 318 NA NA NA NA NA NA 13 17.0 SPSoil NA 0.61 64 39 NA NA - 22 15.1 SPSoil 5 x 5 0.61 38 19 NA NA - NA NA NASoil 3 x 9 0.91 21.1 7 NA NA - 10.4 20.4 SPSoil NA 0.61 NA 20 NA NA - 12.5 NA NASoil NA 0.30 NA 20 NA NA - 19.0 NA NASoil 9.1 x 22.9 0.30 35 12 86 48 - 18.0 17.3 SPTable 3.3-2. Hydraulic Conductivity Data for Compacted Clay Liners.page 88 of 88Site IDHC127HC128HC129HC130HC131HC132HC133HC134HC135HC136HC137HC138HC139HC140HC141HC142HC143HC144HC145HC146HC147HC148HC149CompactorMass (kg)Passes perLiftLiftThickness(mm)Number ofLiftsFormal CQAProgram?WaterContent, w(%)Dry Density,γd(kN/m3)Po4(%)Frequency ofMoistureDensity Tests(no./sq. ft.)Time LapseBetweenCompletion ofLiner and FillingwithWater/WasteLaboratoryHydraulicConductivity5(cm/s) Source of DataQuality Assurance/Quality Control DataConstruction InformationNA NA NA NA NA NA NA 84 NA NA 1.8E-08 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 57 NA NA 2.5E-08 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 71 NA NA 2.2E-09 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 81 NA NA 8.9E-09 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 95 NA NA 1.5E-08 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.0E-09 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 17 NA NA 1.5E-08 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6 NA NA 2.0E-08 Trast and Benson (1995)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 44 NA NA 2.9E-08 Trast and Benson (1995)7,235 8 150 2 NA 15.7 17.3 NA 1 per 68 sq. ft. NA 1.0E-08 Elsbury et al. (1990)7,235 4 150 2 NA 16.4 17.1 NA 1 per 50 sq. ft. NA 1.0E-08 Elsbury et al. (1990)32,000 3 230 4 Yes 18.3 16.3 NA NA NA 2.4E-08 Luettich et al. (1995)32,000 3 230 4 Yes 13.2 17.6 NA NA NA 1.5E-07 Luettich et al. (1995)NA 8 100 2 No 23.5 15.5 NA NA NA 1.0E-08 Day and Daniel (1985)NA 8 100 2 No 28.8 13.8 NA NA NA 3.0E-09 Day and Daniel (1985)NA NA NA 2 No 18 16.5 NA NA Several days 7.0E-08 Daniel (1984)NA NA NA NA No NA NA NA NA NA 3.2E-08 Daniel (1984)NA NA NA NA No 11 18.5 NA NA 2 years 2.5E-07 Daniel (1984)NA NA 150 NA No NA NA NA NA NA 4.5E-08 Daniel (1984)NA NA 230 6 NA 10.4 NA NA NA NA 5.2E-09 Albrecht and Cartwright (1989)NA NA 150 4 NA 12.5 NA NA NA NA 2.0E-08 Trautwein and Williams (1990)NA NA 150 2 No NA NA NA NA NA 2.0E-08 Trautwein and Williams (1990)5,000 NA 150 3 Yes NA NA NA 1 per 63 sq. ft NA 1.8E-08 Rogowski (1985)