alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of WRASP 30, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      22, 2011
431
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **gnovcIIoLLLc8s** ***wo11(1[1**

**OrnrnAL ,:**  **.:**



### %l, Aot*mDhLo~ldmLI%I cident to or&rlrl8atioa

Ot 8 aridCounty,

out of ,rtatr **dirtriat** 

### radar **tornw JC**  **<**
rrtum, 488um.8 to 

### loo6Go&r01 Diarict 

### rlwiodCwpMral or 4 ~,rlod

of ten 

### (10) 1, following

tb l do;tion

### 432

Zt 18 ml1 oett1r4 ru l e, 8t *t u t e r ~fhtlvr drte .

### 433

805or~blr Bueu Oiler, Pa&* 3

### .434

### 43 doaer8bl.e &a008 Gilor,

### 4;

### 43:, 438
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas-New Mexico Power Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack V. Chambers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jack V. Chambers   
|Jack V. Chambers       
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 4, 2004
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20
- 0433 IN THE PARENTING OF: T.J.E., A Minor Child, RACHEL RENE ERICKSON,

Petit io ner and Appellant, and TRAVIS JOHN ERICKSON,

R espondent and Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Mary Sillstrop**  **Obermiller,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as me di ators f or D omest ic Relati ons appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to c onduct the mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURT HER ORDERED th at th e time peri ods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by c ounsel , on the date hereof. DATED thi s September 16, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court

. c: Rachel Rene Erickson, Travis John Erickson, Mary Sillstrop Obermiller 09/16/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0433
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-628 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY 

Effected by Exchange of Letters at 

Paris and Washington June 22 and 28, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY 

Space Cooperation 

 Agreement effected by exchange of letters at 

 Paris and Washington June 22 and 28, 2010; 

 Entered into force June 28, 2010.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: United  States--east coast, Georgia--Florida, Cumberland Sound, Fernardina  Harbor to Kings Bay
SuDocs Number:C 55.418/7:11503/
Item Number:0191-B-13  (online)
System  Number: 000871453
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11503-4-1983.jpg
2012-05-11 11:29
30M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11503-4-1983.pdf
2012-05-14 15:10
30M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11503-8-1985.jpg
2012-05-11 11:30
33M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11503-8-1985.pdf
2012-05-14 15:12
33M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11503-11-1989.jpg
2012-05-11 11:31
34M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11503-11-1989.pdf
2012-05-14 15:13
34M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11503-12-1990.jpg
2012-05-11 11:31
28M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
11503-12-1990.pdf
2012-05-14 15:15
28M
 
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Thumbs.db
2012-05-14 15:15
29K
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  July 6, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### NATIONAL DISTILLERS PRODUCTS COMPANY et al. v. CITY OF JACKSON.

No. 45757.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 27, 1969.

Stennett, Wilkinson, Ward & Tharpe, Jackson, for appellant.

*478John E. Stone, W. T. Neely, Val Surgís, Jackson, for appellants.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

RODGERS, Justice.

The City of Jackson has filed a Motion asking this Court to dismiss the appeal of the appellants for the reason the appeal was not taken within ninety (90) days after the rendition of the judgment appealed from in the circuit court.

It appears that the final judgment in the circuit court was rendered on May 29, 1969, and the appeal bond was filed September 9, 1969. Section 753, Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (1956) Requires that:

> “Appeals to the supreme court shall be taken within ninety (90) days next after the rendition of the judgment or decree complained of, and not after, saving to persons under a disability * * * ”

The Motion to Dismiss is, therefore, sustained and the appeal is dismissed at the cost of appellants.

The appellee, however, insists that inasmuch as this is an appeal from a tax assessment, this Court should grant judgment for the amount of taxes due and unpaid, plus statutory damages and interest.

We hold, however, that the appeal before us is not such an appeal from a monetary judgment so as to require assessment of damages. Inasmuch as there is nothing in the record to show whether or not the taxes have been paid, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice to the right of the City to collect any statutory damages and interest that may have accrued to the City because of the failure of the appellants to pay the tax assessment here involved.

Motion to Dismiss sustained without prejudice to the rights of the City as above shown.

All Judges concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to report 

on small business recovery and the impact of an hourly Federal minimum 

wage increase, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Ms. VAN DUYNE (for herself, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. FITZGERALD, Ms. 

SALAZAR, Mr. GARBARINO, and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to report on small business recovery and the 

impact of an hourly Federal minimum wage increase, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Economic 

5 Recovery Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1718 IH

1 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION REPORTS ON 

2 SMALL BUSINESS RECOVERY AND THE IM3 PACT OF AN HOURLY FEDERAL MINIMUM 

4 WAGE INCREASE. 

5 (a) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

7 of the Small Business Administration shall submit to the 

8 Committee on Small Business of the House of Representa9 tives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepre10 neurship of the Senate a report on the recovery of small 

11 business concerns (as defined under section 3 of the Small 

12 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) from the coronavirus pan13 demic, including the effects of an increase in the Federal 

14 minimum hourly wage to $15— 

15 (1) disaggregated by industry; and 

16 (2) on such concerns that have less than 500 

17 employees. 

18 (b) SUBSEQUENT REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 

19 after the date on which a law is enacted that proposes 

20 increasing the Federal minimum hourly wage to $15 or 

21 greater, the Administrator of the Small Business Adminis22 tration shall submit to the Committee on Small Business 

23 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

24 Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a 

25 study on the effect of such an increase on small business 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1718 IH

1 concerns as compared to small business concerns that pay 

2 the current minimum wage. Such report shall include— 

3 (1) an analysis of the net effect on prices, or 

4 costs of goods or services, provided by such con5 cerns, disaggregated by industry; 

6 (2) a description of the change in levels of em7 ployment and work hours, including any changes in 

8 the age of employees and in the number of part-time 

9 employees; 

10 (3) the total number of job losses associated 

11 with the increase to the Federal minimum hourly 

12 wage, as reported by such concerns; and 

13 (4) an analysis of any increase in automation 

14 associated with such increase. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Utah; Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-
Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 97-075. Applicant: University of Utah, Salt Lake 
City, UT 84112. Instrument: Mass Spectrometer, Model 215-50. 
Manufacturer: Mass Analyser Products, Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended 
Use: See notice at 62 FR 48811, September 17, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) A magnetic 
sector mass analyzer, (2) sensitivity for He of 2.0  x  10<SUP>-4</SUP> 
A/Torr at 200 <greek-m>A trap current and (3) background to 5.0  x  
10<SUP>-4</SUP> cc STP at M/e 36 and to 1.0  x  10<SUP>-15</SUP> cc STP 
at M/e 132. These capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's 
intended purposes and we know of no other instrument or apparatus of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being 
manufactured in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-29629 Filed 11-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59381-59382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29008]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week of October 
24, 1997

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

    Docket Number: OST-97-3027.
    Date Filed: October 20, 1997.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC31 N/C 0040 dated October 14, 1997 r1-6, PTC31 N/C 0041 
dated October 14, 1997 r7-8, PTC31 N/C 0042 dated October 14, 1997 r9, 
Expedited North & Central Pacific Resos, Intended effective date: as 
early as November 15, 1997.

    Docket Number: OST-97-3028.
    Date Filed: October 20, 1997.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC31 N/C 0039 dated October 14, 1997 r1 (015v), PTC31 N/C 
0043 dated October 14, 1997 r2 (002p), Expedited North & Central 
Pacific Reso, Intended effective date: as early as November 15, 1997.

    Docket Number: OST-97-3029.
    Date Filed: October 20, 1997.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC123 0007 dated October 17, 1997, North/Mid/South 
Atlantic Expedited Reso 002q, Intended effective date: January 1, 1997.

    Docket Number: OST-97-3030.
    Date Filed: October 20, 1997.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC23 EUR-WP 0014 dated October 17, 1997, Europe-Southwest 
Pacific Expedited Resos r1-002j r2-015v, Intended effective date: 
December 1, 1997.

    Docket Number: OST-97-3035.
    Date Filed: 10/22/97.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC23 Telex Mail Vote 895, Zimbabwe-South Pacific fare 
increase,

[[Page 59382]]

Intended effective date: November 10, 1997.
Paulette V. Twine,
Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-29008 Filed 10-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### Ida McDERMOTT, a widow, Appellant, v. Howard P. McCLAIN, and American Hospital Supply Corporation, an Illinois corporation, Appellees.

No. 68-269.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 8, 1970.

Albert, Weiner & Rubin, Horton & Schwartz, for appellant.

Dixon, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and W. S. Holland, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on March 4, 1969 (220 So.2d 394) reversing the summary judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed February 18, 1970 (232 So.2d 161) and mandate dated March 23, 1970, now lodged in this court, reversed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for reinstatement of the summary judgment;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued on April 10, 1969 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed March 4, 1969 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the summary 'judgment of the circuit court is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           2,355
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                       947
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,464
<PP&E>                                          10,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,876
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,475)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,356
<SALES>                                          8,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,038
<CGS>                                            8,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    47
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,769)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,768)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 20

- 3456

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

William Carr

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

____________

Submitted: October 18, 2021

Filed: November 30, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges

.

____________

PER CURIAM

.

William Carr received a 40

- month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty to illegally possessing a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(3), 924(a)(2). Although he challenges the sentence on both procedural and substantive grounds, we affirm.-2- We conclude that there was no procedural error , plain or otherwise. See
United States v. Becerra , 958 F.3d 725, 731 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing a sentencing challenge rais ed for the first time on appeal for plain error). The district court 1 considered each of the mitigating circumstances he presented, including his “mental and emotional health,” and simply decided that they did not justify a lower sentence.
See id. ; United States v. Kay

, 717 F.3d 659, 663 (8th Cir. 2013).

Moreover, the sentence itself was substantively reasonable. See United States
v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of discretion); see also United States v. Washingto n , 893 F.3d 1076, 1080

– 81 (8th Cir. 2018) (explaining that a sentence
within the advisory range is presumptively reasonable). The district court sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, including Carr’s dangerous
behavior while trying to evade the police, and did not re ly on an improper factor or
commit a clear error of judgment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) ; United States v. Larison

, 432 F.3d 921, 923

– 24 (8th Cir. 2006). In the end, his argument really comes down to a disagreement with how the district court weighed various factors, which “alone does not justify reversal.” United States v. Townsend , 617 F.3d 991, 994 (8th Cir. 2010); see also United States v. Nguyen , 829 F.3d 907, 925

– 26 (8th Cir. 2016) (acknowledging the “wide latitude” that district courts have to weigh the statutory sentencing factors).

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 15.2
 (CHINESE CHARACTER)
    
    31 Floor Tower B
Far East International Plaza
317 Xian Xia Rd. Shanghai
200051 China
(CHINESE CHARACTER)Tel (CHINESE CHARACTER):8621 6235-1488
Fax(CHINESE CHARACTER): 8621 6235-1477
www.jadefountain.com
 
  Subject: Consent of Jade & Fountain PRC Lawyers
   Jade & Fountain PRC Lawyers
 This document (including any attachment) is confidential and protected by legal privilege. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should not copy or use it or disclose its contents. We should
appreciate notification of incorrect transmission by reply e-mail. The original transmission
(including any attachments) should be deleted and any hard copy returned to us. Thank you!
EXHIBIT
32.02





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Colonial Commercial Corp.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
Salek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 18
U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






By:
                          /s/ William SalekName:
                          William
      SalekChief
      Financial OfficerDate: November 13,
  2008