alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460


## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

***Final Site*** March 2010 

### CHEMETCO Madison County, Illinois

 Site Location: Chemetco is located approximately two miles south of the Village of Hartford, Madison County, Illinois.

 Site History: Chemetco was a former secondary copper smelter operation which operated from 1969 to 2001. The former smelter property occupied more than 230 acres of land, but operated on 41 acres located near the smelter operations. Chemetco’s major function was recycling or secondary processing of copper-bearing scrap and manufacturing residues. This process produced waste byproducts such as slag, zinc oxide (scrubber sludge), and spent refractory brick. On October 31, 2001, the facility was shut down, and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on November 13, 2001. On December 7, 2001 the Illinois EPA issued an order to seal Chemetco.

 Site Contamination/Contaminants: Approximately 452,254 cubic yards of waste slag material have been stockpiled on the northeast corner of the facility property. Approximately 62,204 cubic yards of zinc oxide (s crubber sludge) has been identified as being located in five separate areas on the Chemetco property, including a 2.5 acre concrete bunker located at the north end of the facility. Elevated levels of cadmium, copper and lead have been found in the waste slag material and the zinc oxide.

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: Elevated levels of cadmium, copper and lead have been found in the sediments collected from the wetlands and Long Lake downstream of Chemetco.

 Response Activities (to date): Chemetco fenced the 41 acres near the smelter operations to secure the site.

 Need for NPL Listing: The State of Illinois referred the site to EPA because lead, cadmium and zinc have been detected in wetlands and Long Lake downstream of Chemetco. Other federal and state cl eanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at this time because Chemetco is bankrupt. EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information av ailable at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The d escription may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regardi ng the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FORM 10-K AS FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 20, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DOCUMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         109,853
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,670
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               674,249
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 1,149
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,092,236
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         630,216
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           609,394
<LOANS>                                      7,519,488
<ALLOWANCE>                                     39,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,712,377
<DEPOSITS>                                   5,147,945
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,322,672
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            410,217
<LONG-TERM>                                    115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           316
<OTHER-SE>                                     530,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              10,712,377
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                627,940
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              171,429
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                12,943
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               812,312
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             272,220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             584,778
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          227,534
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   16,469
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,002
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                253,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,836
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     118,935
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   118,935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.10
<LOANS-NON>                                     93,720
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                36,801
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   13,785
<RECOVERIES>                                       175
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               39,660
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            39,660
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-4120

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus DARIUS DANTONI TANZYMORE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR04-22-JFM) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth W. Ravenell, SCHULMAN, TREEM, KAMINKOW, GILDEN & RAVENELL, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Barbara S. Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).-2- PER CURIAM: Darius Tanzymore was indicted on one count of possession of a firearm while being a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Tanzymore pleaded not guilty. During trial, the district court rejected Tanzymore’s justification defense as a matter of law. Tanzymore argued that he possessed the firearm because he feared for his safety and that of his family. Tanzymore then entered a guilty plea during trial conditioned on his right to appeal the justification defense. The court accepted the conditional plea and sentenced Tanzymore to 188 months' imprisonment. This appeal followed. Disposition of this appeal is controlled by our decision in United States v. Bundy , 392 F.3d 641 (4th Cir. 2004). In Bundy, we held that a conditional guilty plea that attempts to preserve non-case-dispositive issues for appellate review is invalid. An issue is case-dispositive only if a ruling in the defendant's favor would require dismissal of the charges or suppression of essential evidence, or a ruling in the government's favor would require affirming the conviction. "In short, there should be no trial after the specified issues are resolved by the court of appeals." 392 F.3d at 648. In this case, Tanzymore’s conditional guilty plea attempted to preserve for appeal a non-case-dispositive issue. If we were to find that Tanzymore was entitled to present a-3- justification defense, the case would be returned to the district court and proceed to trial. As in Bundy , we conclude that "the presence of one non-case-dispositive issue in this conditional plea renders the entire plea invalid." Id . And as in Bundy , we therefore vacate the judgment of conviction and remand for further proceedings.

VACATED AND REMANDED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1610 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1610

   To direct the Federal Communications Commission to prioritize the 
   timely processing of certain long-form applications in the Rural 
               Digital Opportunity Fund Phase I auction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2021

 Mr. Bergman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Federal Communications Commission to prioritize the 
   timely processing of certain long-form applications in the Rural 
               Digital Opportunity Fund Phase I auction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Broadband Window of 
Opportunity Act''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to level the playing field for service 
providers participating in the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund that are 
disadvantaged by short construction seasons.

SEC. 3. APPLICATION PROCESSING PRIORITIZATION.

    With respect to the long-form applicants of the Rural Digital 
Opportunity Fund Phase I auction provided for in the Report and Order 
in the matter of Rural Digital Opportunity Fund and Connect America 
Fund adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (in this section 
referred to as the ``Commission'') on December 7, 2020 (FCC 20-5), the 
Commission shall prioritize the timely processing of long-form 
applications and any subsequent paperwork (in this section referred to 
as the ``applications'') submitted by the long-form applicants as 
follows: The Commission shall prioritize the timely processing of 
applications which are proposing to provide service in geographic areas 
which the Commission determines to have the shortest construction 
seasons (such as in areas characterized by long winters with heavy 
snowfall).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000022698
<NAME>                        COMSAT
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
<CURRENCY>                                      U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         7,995
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               332,693
<PP&E>                                         2,594,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,207,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,960,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,967
<BONDS>                                        458,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       414,630
<OTHER-SE>                                     226,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,960,346
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,717
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  65,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               59,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,519
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,669)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.07
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                   

<ARTICLE>                            5
<CIK>                                0000021239
<NAME>                               Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                         1
<CURRENCY>                           U.S. DOLLARS
                           
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                      1
<CASH>                               272,727
<SECURITIES>                         3,051,981
<RECEIVABLES>                        125,039
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     3,605,600
<PP&E>                               4,136,556
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       9,571,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                82,836
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             4,806,763
<OTHER-SE>                           4,682,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         9,571,907
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     82,458
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        362,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (280,495)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (280,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         (208,495)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.01)
                                  
                                  
                                  

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2




 




Promissory

Note




 




 




February 21, 2003




 




For

value received, I promise to pay to the order of MagStar Technologies, Inc. at

its banking house in 410 11th Avenue So, Hopkins, MN 55343 Five Hundred Ten

Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty One and 97/100 

dollars ($510,851.97)  with

interest at the rate of six percent (6.00%) per annum, from April 1, 2003 until

paid, interest payable at maturity.




 




Upon

any default in the payment of interest or installment, the note shall become

immediately due and payable at the option of the holder hereof.




 




The

makers, endorsers, sureties, and guarantors hereof hereby severally agree to

pay all costs of collection, or a reasonable attorney’s fee in case payment

shall not be made at maturity, and severally waive presentment for payment,

notice of non payment, protest and notice of protest, and diligence in

enforcing payment or bringing suit against any party hereto.  The endorsers, sureties, and guarantors

hereof, hereby severally consent that the time of payment may be extended or

this note renewed from time to time without notice to them and without

affecting their liability hereon.




 




Said

sum to be paid on demand.




 




 




	

   


  	

  By:


  	

  Hopkins Eleventh

  Avenue LLC


  
	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  /s/ Richard F.

  McNamara


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  Its CEO
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedCell Power Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Cameron King, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Cameron King



Cameron King

Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer

December 22, 2003
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Nicholas D. Gerber, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United States Brent Oil Fund, LP;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ Nicholas D. GerberName:
Nicholas D. GerberTitle:
President and Chief Executive OfficerUnited States Commodity Funds LLC,General Partner of United States Brent Oil Fund, LP
Exhibit 99.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas-New Mexico Power Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack V. Chambers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company











/s/ Jack V. Chambers








Jack V. Chambers


Chief Executive Officer


November 6, 2002
**COMPREHENSIVE CARECORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with thequarterly report of Comprehensive Care Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2010 (the “Report”),Giuseppe Crisafi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)         The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60313-60314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29484]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determinations

    Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C.

[[Page 60314]]

2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 13359, March 29, 
1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, 
July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in 
the exhibit, ``CHINA: 5000 YEARS'' (see list) \1\, imported from abroad 
for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to 
loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects at the Guggenheim 
Museum from on or about January 29, 1998, through on or about June 3, 
1998, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 3, 1997.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-29484 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M

----------
  \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Neila 
Sheahan, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 619-5030. The address is 
U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, 
D.C. 20547-0001.