alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 158 

To require the Federal Railroad Administration to provide appropriate congressional notice of comprehensive safety assessments conducted with 

respect to intercity or commuter rail passenger transportation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. SIRES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Railroad Administration to provide 

appropriate congressional notice of comprehensive safety 

assessments conducted with respect to intercity or commuter rail passenger transportation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rail Audit Trans5 parency Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 158 IH

1 SEC. 2. NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ASSESS2 MENTS. 

3 (a) INITIAL NOTICE.—Not later than 10 business 

4 days after the Federal Railroad Administration initiates 

5 a comprehensive safety assessment of an entity providing 

6 regularly scheduled intercity or commuter rail passenger 

7 transportation, the Federal Railroad Administration shall 

8 notify in electronic format the Committee on Transpor9 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 

10 and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transpor11 tation of the Senate, and each member of Congress rep12 resenting a State in which the service that is the subject 

13 of the assessment being conducted is located, of the initi14 ation of that assessment. 

15 (b) FINDINGS.—Not later than 90 days after comple16 tion of a comprehensive safety assessment described in 

17 subsection (a), the Federal Railroad Administration shall 

18 transmit in electronic format to the Committee on Trans19 portation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa20 tives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

21 Transportation of the Senate, and to each member of Con22 gress representing a State in which the service that is the 

23 subject of the assessment being conducted is located, its 

24 findings of that assessment, including identified defects 

25 and any recommendations. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 158 IH

1 (c) DEFINITION.—For purpose of this section, the 

2 term ‘‘comprehensive safety assessment’’ means a focused 

3 review of the safety-related processes and procedures, 

4 compliance with safety regulations and requirements, and 

5 overall safety culture of an entity providing regularly 

6 scheduled intercity or commuter rail passenger transpor7 tation. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.48 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Instrument Amending the Treaty of 

December 17, 2001 Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWEDEN 

Signed at Brussels December 16, 2004 

with 

Annex 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SWEDEN 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Instrument amending the treaty of December 17, 2001. 

Signed at Brussels December 16, 2004; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-13, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-13, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at Prague 

 April 28, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex. 





NOTE: The first sentence of Article 3 should be numbered "1".


NOTE: It is noted that the title for Article 7 differs from what is listed in the Table of Con























NOTE: It is noted that the title for "Artikel 7" differs from what is listed in the Table of Contents.
#### Lewis Edward JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-714.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate and set aside judgment and sentence.

Appellant had been found guilty of violation of the beverage laws under § 562.27 F.S.A. and was sentenced “ * * * to pay a fine of $2,500.00 and 4.00 court costs, and in default of the payment thereof, that you be confined in the State Prison of Florida, at hard labor for a term of three (3) years.” Appellant was unable to pay the fine and is now serving time at the state prison. Appellant is an indigent, having been adjudged insolvent in the trial court below. Therefore, in the light of Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395, 91 S.Ct. 668, 28 L.Ed.2d 130 (1971), the sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded for resen-tencing not inconsistent with this opinion.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
Public Service Company of New Mexico

Alvarado Square

Albuquerque, NM 87158

LOGO

EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, for Public Service Company of New Mexico
(Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2010 (Report), I, Charles N. Eldred, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles N.
Eldred               
|                     |  |     |  | Charles N. Eldred                   
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and        
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer             
|                     |  |     |  | Public Service Company of New Mexico
The State of T/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00455-CR

Abraham SANCHEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR7645

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court imposed sentence on April 15, 2015; Appellant had thirty days to file a 

motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1993). Because the clerk’s record in this appeal does not show Appellant timely 

filed a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on May 15, 2015. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the trial court on July 20, 

2015. 

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. 

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a timely motion for new trial, a 

defendant’s notice of appeal is timely filed if filed within thirty days after (1) the day sentence is 

imposed or suspended in open court, or (2) the day the trial court enters an appealable order. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. In this case, the appellate record does not show 

that Appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed.

A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeal’s 

jurisdiction if: 

(1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing; 

(2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen 

days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal; and 

(3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. 
Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991) (stating that an out-of-time appeal from a final felony conviction may be 

sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure). 

Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within FIFTEEN DAYS of 

the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo, 

918 S.W.2d at 522; Ater, 802 S.W.2d at 243.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Freida Hoffelman *et al.,*Respondents, *vs.*George Frank, Appellant.

1. *Practice, civil*— Bill *of exceptions*— Filing *after the proper time*— Supreme *Court.*— The Court will not notice a bill of exceptions filed after the proper time.

*Appeal from St. Louis Oireuit Court.*

*Thomas S. Espy,*for Appellant.

Appellant filed- an elaborate brief, but it is necessarily omitted here, because the Court does not pass upon the points discussed therein.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the Court at General Term dismissed the appeal taken from the judgment at Special Term, and the defendant has prosecuted his appeal to this Court. Upon looking into the record, we-find that there is no bill *of exceptions that*we can notice. The motion for a new trial was overruled on the 13th day of October, 1871, and time during the term was granted to file the bill of exceptions, and afterwards two extensions of time were given for filing the same; the first till December 30, 1871, and the second till January 1st, 1872. But the Bill was not filed till the 26th day of January 1872, being twenty-five days after the time stipulated. It was then filed without any authority whatever, and we cannot therefore notice it. Hence there is nothing in the record to review.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

The other Judges concur.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis 

MARIA E. RUSSO 

v. Record No. 2400-94-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

CAPITAL GARDENS, INC. T/A MAY 30, 1995 

 DENNIS' SPAGHETTI AND STEAK HOUSE 

AND 

AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (John H. Klein; Rutter & Montagna, on brief), 

 for appellant. 

 (Robert W. McFarland; Mark S. Davis; Kevin E. Mooney; 

 McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, on brief), for appellees. 

 The sole issue on this appeal is whether the Workers' 

Compensation Commission erred in finding that Maria E. Russo 

failed to prove that she sustained an injury by accident arising 

out of her employment. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs 

of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 

5A:27. 

 On appellate review, we construe the evidence in the light 

most favorable to the party prevailing below. R.G. Moore Bldg. 

Corp. v. Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 

(1990). To recover benefits, Russo must establish that she 

suffered an injury by accident "arising out of and in the course 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

of [her] employment." Code § 65.2-101. "The phrase arising 'out 

of' refers to the origin or cause of the injury." County of 

Chesterfield v. Johnson, 237 Va. 180, 183, 376 S.E.2d 73, 74 

(1989). 

 The evidence proved that Russo was employed as a waitress in 

employer's restaurant. While she was working, she bent down to 

pick up a napkin off of the floor and felt pain in her knee. At 

the hearing, Russo demonstrated that she bent over, with her left 

foot slightly off of the ground behind her, and she reached for 

the napkin with her left hand. Russo sustained a left knee 

injury as a result of this incident. 

 In denying Russo's application on the basis that her injury 

did not arise out of her employment, the commission made the 

following findings: 

 We agree with the Deputy Commissioner's 

determination . . . [that] a "critical link" 

must exist between the conditions and the 

injury in order for the injury to arise out 

of the employment. No such link has been 

proven. The claimant was performing a simple 

bending motion when her knee gave out. 

Excluded from coverage under the Act are 

workplace injuries that come from hazards to 

which the worker would have been equally 

exposed apart from the employment. 

 The commission's decision is supported by County of 

Chesterfield v. Johnson, 237 Va. 180, 186, 376 S.E.2d 73, 76 

(1989), and Plumb Rite Plumbing Serv. v. Barbour, 8 Va. App. 482, 

484, 382 S.E.2d 305, 306 (1989). Therefore, we affirm the 

commission's decision. 
 3 

Affirmed.
SUPPLEMENT TO THE CURRENTLY EFFECTIVE PROSPECTUSES

                                 -----------------

                        DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund

The following information replaces information about the portfolio management
team in the "Portfolio management" section of the fund's prospectuses:

The fund is managed by a team of investment professionals who collaborate to
implement the fund's investment strategy. Each portfolio manager on the team
has authority over all aspects of the fund's investment portfolio, including,
but not limited to, purchases and sales of individual securities, portfolio
construction techniques, portfolio risk assessment and the management of daily
cash flows in accordance with the portfolio holdings.

The following people handle the day-to-day management of the fund.

Thomas Gerhardt                           Rainer Vermehren
Managing Director of Deutsche Asset       Director of Deutsche Asset Management
Management and Lead Portfolio manager     and Portfolio Manager of the fund.
of the fund.                               o Joined Deutsche Asset Management
 o Joined Deutsche Asset Management in       in 1997 and the fund in 2009.
   1994 and the fund in 2009.              o Portfolio manager for emerging
 o Head of Emerging Markets Equity:          markets equity: Frankfurt.
   Frankfurt.                              o Joined Deutsche Asset Management
 o Previously worked as assistant            after three years as assistant to
   auditor at KPMG for one year prior        fund manager in Latin American
   to joining Deutsche Asset                 equities at Morgan Stanley, New
   Management.                               York.
 o Master's degree in business             o BA, Towson University; MBA,
   administration (Diplom-Kaufmann),         Fordham University.
   Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University,
   Frankfurt.

The fund's Statement of Additional Information provides additional information
about a portfolio manager's investments in the fund, a description of the
portfolio management compensation structure and information regarding the
accounts managed.


               Please Retain This Supplement for Future Reference





                                                          [DWS INVESTMENTS LOGO]
                                                           Deutsche Bank Group

July 31, 2009
DGINTF2-3600
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan

Item #29 

Does the application include the plan sponsor’s representation that, if it receives the Treasury 

Department’s final authorization to suspend and then choose to implement the suspension, it will 

also amend the plan

• to indicate that the suspension will cease upon the plan sponsor’s failure to 

determine that both all reasonable measures continue to be taken to avoid 

insolvency and that the plan is projected to become insolvent without a suspension, 

• to require that any future benefit improvements must satisfy § 432(e)(9)(E), and 

• to specify that the plan sponsor will not modify these amendments, notwithstanding 

any other provision of the plan document. 

See section 6.06. 

The required representation is attached as document number 29.1. 

29.0
29.1
<PAGE>
                 COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comprehensive Care
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2003 (the
"Report"), Mary Jane Johnson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                       /s/ Mary Jane Johnson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Mary Jane Johnson
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       April 11, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Comprehensive Care Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive
Care Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       23
**SCHEDULE TO EXHIBIT 10.22.1**

 

 

 

**WASHINGTON GROUP RETENTION AGREEMENTSWITH NAMED EXECUTIVES**

 

 

**EACH DATED AS OF MARCH 14, 2001**

 

George H. Juetten

Ambrose L. Schwallie

Thomas H. Zarges

 

 

**DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 16, 2001**

 

Stephen M. Johnson

 

NOTE:  Mr. Johnson’s Retention Agreement is identical in all materialsterms to those entered into with Messrs Juetten, Schwallie and Zarges, with theexception that his Retention Bonus is prorated to allow for the time duringearly 2001 when he was not in the Company’s employ.  Mr. Johnson returned to the employ of the Company on November 12,2001.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION








Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)







In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Zoom Telephonics, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert A. Crist, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:






(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date: March 31, 2010

/s/ Robert A. CristName: Robert A. CristTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Steven C. McNeal, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Texas Restoration Funding, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.





---




Date:  March 28, 2022








By /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer


of Entergy Texas, Inc., as Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the servicing


function)
### ~I 

# CC17 -oz_ RECEIVED IN 

# • r.r" lOT 01= CRIMINAL**fat'PEAI.~**